UNUMPROVIDENT CORP - 10-Q Quarterly Report

Back to GetFilings.com

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D. C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

Quarterly report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2004.

Commission file number 1-11834

UnumProvident Corporation

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware

62-1598430

(State or other jurisdiction of

incorporation or organization)

(I.R.S. Employer

Identification No.)

1 FOUNTAIN SQUARE

CHATTANOOGA, TENNESSEE 37402

(Address of principal executive offices)

423.755.1011

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Not Applicable

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 12b-2). Yes x No ¨

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.


Class		Outstanding at June 30, 2004
Common stock, $0.10 par value		296,405,532

TABLE OF CONTENTS


			Page
	Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements		1

		PART I

1.	Financial Statements (Unaudited):

		Condensed Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition at June 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003	3

		Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003	5

		Condensed Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity for the six months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003	6

		Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the six months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003	7

		Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements	8

		Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm	29

2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations		30

3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk		79

4.	Controls and Procedures		79

	PART II

1.	Legal Proceedings		80

2.	Changes in Securities, Use of Proceeds, and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities		80

4.	Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders		80

6.	Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K		82

	Signatures		83

Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (the Act) provides a “safe-harbor” for forward-looking statements which are identified as such and are accompanied by the identification of important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from the forward-looking statements. For these statements, UnumProvident Corporation, together with its subsidiaries, unless the context implies otherwise (the Company), claims the protection afforded by the safe harbor in the Act. Certain information contained in this discussion, or in any other written or oral statements made by the Company, is or may be considered as forward-looking. Examples of disclosures that contain such information include, among others, sales estimates, income projections, and reserves and related assumptions. Forward-looking statements are those not based on historical information, but rather relate to future operations, strategies, financial results, or other developments and speak only as of the date made. These statements may be made directly in this document or may be made part of this document by reference to other documents filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission by the Company, which is known as “incorporation by reference.” You can find many of these statements by looking for words such as “may,” “should,” “believes,” “expects,” “anticipates,” “estimates,” “intends,” “projects,” “goals,” “objectives,” or similar expressions in this document or in documents incorporated herein.

These forward-looking statements are subject to numerous assumptions, risks, and uncertainties, many of which are beyond the Company’s control. Factors that may cause actual results to differ materially from those contemplated by the forward-looking statements include, among others, the following factors:

•

General economic or business conditions, both domestic and foreign, may be less favorable than expected, which may affect premium levels, claims experience, the level of pension benefit costs and funding, and investment results, including credit deterioration of investments.

•

Competitive pressures in the insurance industry may increase significantly through industry consolidation, competitor demutualization, or otherwise.

•

Events or consequences relating to terrorism and acts of war, both domestic and foreign, may adversely affect the Company’s business and results of operations in a period and may also affect the availability and cost of reinsurance.

•

Legislative, regulatory, or tax changes, both domestic and foreign, may adversely affect the businesses in which the Company is engaged.

•

Rating agency actions, state insurance department market conduct examinations, other governmental investigations, and negative media attention may adversely affect the Company’s business and results of operations in a period.

•

The level and results of litigation may vary from prior experience, rulings in the multidistrict litigation may not be favorable to the Company, and either may adversely affect the Company’s business and results of operations in a period.

•

Investment results, including, but not limited to, realized investment losses resulting from impairments, may differ from prior experience and may adversely affect the Company’s business and results of operations in a period.

•

Changes in the interest rate environment may adversely affect reserve and policy assumptions and ultimately profit margins and reserve levels.

•

Sales growth may be less than planned, which could affect revenue and profitability.

•

Effectiveness in supporting new product offerings and providing customer service may not meet expectations.

•

Actual experience in pricing, underwriting, and reserving may deviate from the Company’s assumptions.

•

Actual persistency may be lower than projected persistency, resulting in lower than expected revenue and higher than expected amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs.

•

Incidence and recovery rates may be influenced by, among other factors, the rate of unemployment and consumer confidence, the emergence of new diseases, new trends and developments in medical treatments, and the effectiveness of risk management programs.

•

Insurance reserve liabilities may fluctuate as a result of changes in numerous factors, and such fluctuations can have material positive or negative effects on net income.

•

Retained risks in the Company’s reinsurance operations are influenced primarily by the credit risk of the reinsurers and potential contract disputes. Any material changes in the reinsurers’ credit risk or willingness to pay according to the terms of the contract may adversely affect the Company’s business and results of operations in a period.

For further discussion of risks and uncertainties which could cause actual results to differ from those contained in the forward-looking statements, see “Risk Factors” contained in Part 1 of the Company’s Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003.

All subsequent written and oral forward-looking statements attributable to the Company or any person acting on its behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety by the cautionary statements contained or referred to in this section. The Company does not undertake any obligation to release publicly any revisions to such forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date of this document or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events.

PART I

ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION

UnumProvident Corporation and Subsidiaries


	June 30 2004		December 31 2003
	(in millions of dollars)
	(Unaudited)
Assets

Investments
Fixed Maturity Securities - at fair value
Available-for-Sale - Continuing Operations	$	29,829.4	$	30,084.2
Available-for-Sale - Discontinued Operations		—		1,102.4

Total Fixed Maturity Securities		29,829.4		31,186.6
Equity Securities		21.5		39.1
Mortgage Loans		441.7		474.7
Real Estate		26.3		25.9
Policy Loans		2,874.5		2,877.9
Other Long-term Investments		72.6		91.9
Short-term Investments		825.1		332.2

Total Investments		34,091.1		35,028.3

Other Assets
Cash and Bank Deposits		119.2		119.2
Accounts and Premiums Receivable		2,146.7		2,093.5
Reinsurance Receivable		6,827.0		6,242.6
Accrued Investment Income		551.1		543.6
Deferred Policy Acquisition Costs		2,833.3		3,051.9
Value of Business Acquired		108.8		463.5
Goodwill		269.9		476.7
Other Assets		1,524.6		1,336.3
Other Assets - Discontinued Operations		—		330.2
Separate Account Assets		32.0		32.5

Total Assets	$	48,503.7	$	49,718.3

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION - Continued

UnumProvident Corporation and Subsidiaries


	June 30 2004			December 31 2003
	(in millions of dollars)
	(Unaudited)
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity

Liabilities
Policy and Contract Benefits	$	2,122.9		$	1,928.4
Reserves for Future Policy and Contract Benefits and Unearned Premiums		32,067.0			31,431.1
Other Policyholders’ Funds		2,465.9			2,493.3
Current Income Tax		48.0			32.8
Deferred Income Tax		572.2			914.0
Long-term Debt		3,089.0			2,789.0
Other Liabilities		1,880.3			1,363.6
Other Liabilities - Discontinued Operations		—			1,462.6
Separate Account Liabilities		32.0			32.5

Total Liabilities		42,277.3			42,447.3

Commitments and Contingent Liabilities - Note 9

Stockholders’ Equity
Common Stock, $0.10 par Authorized: 725,000,000 shares Issued: 298,356,627 and 298,094,517 shares		29.8			29.8
Additional Paid-in Capital		1,586.0			1,609.1
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income		746.6			1,171.2
Retained Earnings		3,927.5			4,526.9
Treasury Stock - at cost: 1,951,095 shares		(54.2	)		(54.2	)
Deferred Compensation		(9.3	)		(11.8	)

Total Stockholders’ Equity		6,226.4			7,271.0

Total Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity	$	48,503.7		$	49,718.3

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (UNAUDITED)

UnumProvident Corporation and Subsidiaries


	Three Months Ended June 30						Six Months Ended June 30
	2004			2003			2004			2003
	(in millions of dollars, except share data)
Revenue
Premium Income	$	1,956.8		$	1,911.2		$	3,913.0		$	3,782.5
Net Investment Income		532.9			535.0			1,067.0			1,054.3
Net Realized Investment Loss		(86.5	)		(26.5	)		(61.1	)		(111.6	)
Other Income		106.1			109.5			214.1			198.8

Total Revenue		2,509.3			2,529.2			5,133.0			4,924.0

Benefits and Expenses
Benefits and Change in Reserves for Future Benefits		1,756.8			1,765.8			3,636.1			3,909.2
Commissions		212.4			214.1			433.7			435.3
Interest and Debt Expense		51.5			45.9			100.7			87.4
Deferral of Policy Acquisition Costs		(146.1	)		(173.0	)		(294.4	)		(345.7	)
Amortization of Deferred Policy Acquisition Costs		109.6			116.2			218.2			230.2
Amortization of Value of Business Acquired		5.2			10.7			9.1			20.5
Impairment of Intangible Assets		—			—			856.4			—
Compensation Expense		185.1			192.5			372.8			383.1
Other Operating Expenses		222.7			219.6			458.5			456.1

Total Benefits and Expenses		2,397.2			2,391.8			5,791.1			5,176.1

Income (Loss) from Continuing Operations Before Income Tax		112.1			137.4			(658.1	)		(252.1	)

Income Tax (Benefit)		37.1			43.3			(163.8	)		(97.2	)

Income (Loss) from Continuing Operations		75.0			94.1			(494.3	)		(154.9	)

Discontinued Operations - Note 2
Income (Loss) Before Income Tax		(108.2	)		6.7			(97.4	)		10.7
Income Tax (Benefit)		(40.4	)		2.3			(36.6	)		3.7

Income (Loss) from Discontinued Operations		(67.8	)		4.4			(60.8	)		7.0

Net Income (Loss)	$	7.2		$	98.5		$	(555.1	)	$	(147.9	)

Earnings Per Common Share
*Basic*
Income (Loss) from Continuing Operations	$	0.25		$	0.35		$	(1.67	)	$	(0.60	)
Net Income (Loss)	$	0.02		$	0.36		$	(1.88	)	$	(0.58	)
*Assuming Dilution*
Income (Loss) from Continuing Operations	$	0.25		$	0.34		$	(1.67	)	$	(0.60	)
Net Income (Loss)	$	0.02		$	0.36		$	(1.88	)	$	(0.58	)

Dividends Paid	$	0.0750		$	0.0750		$	0.1500		$	0.2225

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (UNAUDITED)

UnumProvident Corporation and Subsidiaries


	Common Stock		Additional Paid-in Capital			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income			Retained Earnings			Treasury Stock			Deferred Compensation			Total
	(in millions of dollars)
Balance at December 31, 2002	$	24.4	$	1,086.8		$	777.4		$	5,011.4		$	(54.2	)	$	(2.6	)	$	6,843.2

Comprehensive Income, Net of Tax
Net Loss										(147.9	)								(147.9	)
Change in Net Unrealized Gain on Securities							470.1												470.1
Change in Net Gain on Cash Flow Hedges							33.5												33.5
Change in Foreign Currency Translation Adjustment							61.6												61.6

Total Comprehensive Income																			417.3

Issuance of Equity Security Units				(37.4	)														(37.4	)
Common Stock Activity		5.4		557.2												(12.5	)		550.1
Dividends to Stockholders										(53.7	)								(53.7	)

Balance at June 30, 2003	$	29.8	$	1,606.6		$	1,342.6		$	4,809.8		$	(54.2	)	$	(15.1	)	$	7,719.5

Balance at December 31, 2003	$	29.8	$	1,609.1		$	1,171.2		$	4,526.9		$	(54.2	)	$	(11.8	)	$	7,271.0
Comprehensive Loss, Net of Tax
Net Loss										(555.1	)								(555.1	)
Change in Net Unrealized Gain on Securities							(408.7	)											(408.7	)
Change in Net Gain on Cash Flow Hedges							(21.5	)											(21.5	)
Change in Foreign Currency Translation Adjustment							5.6												5.6

Total Comprehensive Loss																			(979.7	)

Issuance of Equity Security Units				(27.6	)														(27.6	)
Common Stock Activity				4.5												2.5			7.0
Dividends to Stockholders										(44.3	)								(44.3	)

Balance at June 30, 2004	$	29.8	$	1,586.0		$	746.6		$	3,927.5		$	(54.2	)	$	(9.3	)	$	6,226.4

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (UNAUDITED)

UnumProvident Corporation and Subsidiaries


	Six Months Ended June 30
	2004			2003
	(in millions of dollars)
Cash Flows from Operating Activities
Net Loss	$	(555.1	)	$	(147.9	)
Adjustments to Reconcile Net Loss to Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities
Policy Acquisition Costs Capitalized		(308.0	)		(362.7	)
Amortization and Depreciation		262.6			287.0
Impairment of Intangible Assets		856.4			—
Net Realized Investment Loss		61.5			114.6
Insurance Reserves and Liabilities		944.3			1,258.0
Income Tax		(193.2	)		(62.9	)
Cash Transferred to Reinsurer on Amendment of Existing Contract from Coinsurance to Modified Coinsurance		—			(286.2	)
Other		(648.3	)		(347.6	)

Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities		420.2			452.3

Cash Flows from Investing Activities
Proceeds from Sales of Investments		887.1			1,670.4
Proceeds from Maturities of Investments		1,035.9			1,461.7
Purchase of Investments		(2,089.2	)		(3,628.8	)
Net Purchases of Short-term Investments		(487.8	)		(893.1	)
Acquisition of Business		—			110.0
Disposition of Business		18.8			—
Other		(24.5	)		(9.6	)

Net Cash Used by Investing Activities		(659.7	)		(1,289.4	)

Cash Flows from Financing Activities
Deposits to Policyholder Accounts		2.0			3.8
Maturities and Benefit Payments from Policyholder Accounts		(7.3	)		(11.6	)
Net Short-term Debt Repayments		—			(235.0	)
Issuance of Long-term Debt		300.0			575.0
Issuance of Common Stock		4.2			548.5
Dividends Paid to Stockholders		(44.3	)		(53.7	)
Other		(15.5	)		(16.5	)

Net Cash Provided by Financing Activities		239.1			810.5

Effect of Foreign Exchange Rate Changes on Cash		0.4			1.5


Net Increase (Decrease) in Cash and Bank Deposits		—			(25.1	)

Cash and Bank Deposits at Beginning of Year		119.2			142.2

Cash and Bank Deposits at End of Period	$	119.2		$	117.1

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

UnumProvident Corporation and Subsidiaries

June 30, 2004

Note 1 - Basis of Presentation

The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements of UnumProvident Corporation and subsidiaries (the Company) have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals, the impairment of intangible assets as discussed in Note 3, and the reserve strengthening as discussed in Note 4) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. Operating results for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2004, are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ended December 31, 2004. Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to current period presentation.

The sale of the Company’s Canadian branch closed during the second quarter of 2004. The Canadian branch was accounted for as an asset held for sale at December 31, 2003 and is reported as a discontinued operation in the condensed consolidated financial statements. Except where noted, the information presented in the notes to condensed consolidated financial statements excludes the Canadian branch. See Note 2.

For further information, refer to the consolidated financial statements and footnotes thereto included in the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003.

Note 2 - Discontinued Operations

During the fourth quarter of 2003, the Company entered into an agreement to sell its Canadian branch and began accounting for its Canadian branch as an asset held for sale. In conjunction with the classification of the Canadian branch as an asset held for sale, during the fourth quarter of 2003 the Company tested the goodwill related to the Canadian branch for impairment and determined that the balance of $190.9 million was impaired. The Company also recognized a loss of $9.3 million before tax and $6.0 million after tax to write down the value of bonds in the Canadian branch investment portfolio to market value. These two charges, which total $196.9 million after tax, were included in the fourth quarter of 2003 loss from discontinued operations. The Company recognized an additional loss of $0.6 million before tax and $0.4 million after tax in the first quarter of 2004 to write down the value of bonds in the Canadian branch investment portfolio to market value.

The transaction closed effective April 30, 2004, and in the second quarter of 2004, the Company reported a loss of $113.0 million before tax and $70.9 million after tax on the sale of the branch. Assets transferred to the buyer included available-for-sale fixed maturity securities with a fair value of $1,099.4 million and a book value of $957.7 million. Liabilities transferred included reserves of $1,254.8 million.

The Company retained a portion of the Canadian branch fixed maturity bond portfolio according to the terms of the transaction. The bonds retained had a fair value, at April 30, 2004, of $732.9 million and a yield of 7.14 percent. These investments will be redeployed to other lines of business.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) - Continued

UnumProvident Corporation and Subsidiaries

June 30, 2004

Note 2 - Discontinued Operations - Continued

Prior period operating results related to the Canadian branch, which previously were primarily reported in the Income Protection segment, have been reclassified to discontinued operations for all periods presented. Selected results for the Canadian branch are as follows:


	Three Months Ended June 30					Six Months Ended June 30
	2004			2003		2004			2003
	(in millions of dollars, except share data)
Premium Income	$	31.3		$	87.7	$	124.5		$	168.7

Total Revenue	$	36.9		$	105.3	$	146.2		$	198.7

Income Before Income Tax Excluding Loss on Sale	$	4.8		$	6.7	$	16.2		$	10.7
Loss on Sale		(113.0	)		—		(113.6	)		—

Income (Loss) Before Income Tax	$	(108.2	)	$	6.7	$	(97.4	)	$	10.7

Income Excluding Loss on Sale	$	3.1		$	4.4	$	10.5		$	7.0
Loss on Sale, After Income Tax		(70.9	)		—		(71.3	)		—

Income (Loss)	$	(67.8	)	$	4.4	$	(60.8	)	$	7.0

Income (Loss) Per Share
Basic	$	(0.23	)	$	0.01	$	(0.21	)	$	0.02
Assuming Dilution	$	(0.23	)	$	0.02	$	(0.21	)	$	0.02

Note 3 - Segment Information and Impairment of Intangible Assets

In the first quarter of 2004, the Company restructured its individual income protection – closed block business wherein three of its insurance subsidiaries entered into reinsurance agreements to reinsure approximately 66.7 percent of potential future losses that occur above a specified retention limit. The individual income protection – closed block reserves in these three subsidiaries comprise approximately 90 percent of the Company’s overall retained risk in the closed block of individual income protection. The reinsurance agreements effectively provide approximately 60 percent reinsurance coverage for the Company’s overall consolidated risk above the retention limit. The maximum risk limit for the reinsurer is approximately $783.0 million initially and grows to approximately $2.6 billion over time, after which any further losses will revert to the Company. These reinsurance transactions were effective as of April 1, 2004. The Company transferred cash equal to $521.6 million of reserves ceded in the Individual Income Protection – Closed Block segment plus an additional $185.8 million in cash for a before-tax prepaid cost of insurance which was deferred and will be amortized into earnings over the expected claim payment period covered under the Company’s retention limit. The Company retained the higher yielding investments historically associated with these reserves and redeployed these investments to other lines of business.

In conjunction with the restructuring of the individual income protection – closed block business, effective January 1, 2004, the Company modified its reporting segments to include a separate segment for this business. The reporting, monitoring, and management of the closed block of individual income protection business as a discrete segment is consistent with the Company’s financial restructuring and separation of this business from the lines of business which still actively market new products. In the past, this business had been reported in the Income

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) - Continued

UnumProvident Corporation and Subsidiaries

June 30, 2004

Note 3 - Segment Information and Impairment of Intangible Assets - Continued

Protection segment. Prior to 2004, detailed separate financial metrics and models were unavailable to appropriately manage this block of business separately from the recently issued individual income protection block of business.

The change in the Company’s reporting segments required the Company to perform, separately for the individual income protection – closed block business and individual income protection – recently issued business, impairment testing for goodwill and loss recognition testing for the recoverability of deferred policy acquisition costs and value of business acquired. As required under GAAP, prior to the change in reporting segments, these tests were performed for the individual income protection line of business on a combined basis. The testing indicated impairment of the individual income protection – closed block deferred policy acquisition costs, value of business acquired, and goodwill balances of $282.2 million, $367.1 million, and $207.1 million, respectively. These impairment charges, $856.4 million before tax and $629.1 million after tax, are included in the net loss reported for the six month period ended June 30, 2004. The Company also strengthened its claim reserves for the closed block of individual income protection business $110.6 million before tax to reflect the implementation of a lower claim reserve discount rate. The impairment charges and reserve strengthening, which total $967.0 million before tax, are all reported in the Individual Income Protection – Closed Block segment. See Note 4 for additional information concerning the claim reserve strengthening.

Due to the aforementioned restructuring, the Company’s reporting segments include the following six business segments: Income Protection, Life and Accident, Colonial, Individual Income Protection – Closed Block, Other, and Corporate. The segments remain unchanged from the prior year reporting other than the separation of the Individual Income Protection – Closed Block from the Income Protection segment. Prior year numbers have been reclassified to conform to the current segment reporting.

In the following segment financial data, “operating revenue” excludes net realized investment gains and losses. “Operating income” or “operating loss” excludes net realized investment gains and losses, income tax, and results of discontinued operations. These are considered non-GAAP financial measures. These non-GAAP financial measures of “operating revenue” and “operating income” or “operating loss” differ from revenue and income (loss) from continuing operations before income tax as presented in the Company’s condensed consolidated operating results reported herein and in income statements prepared in accordance with GAAP due to the exclusion of before tax realized investment gains and losses. The Company measures segment performance for purposes of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 131, Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information, excluding realized investment gains and losses because management believes that this performance measure is a better indicator of the ongoing businesses and the underlying trends in the businesses. The Company’s investment focus is on investment income to support its insurance liabilities as opposed to the generation of realized investment gains and losses, and a long-term focus is necessary to maintain profitability over the life of the business. Realized investment gains and losses are dependent on market conditions and not necessarily related to decisions regarding the underlying business of the Company’s segments.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) - Continued

UnumProvident Corporation and Subsidiaries

June 30, 2004

Note 3 - Segment Information and Impairment of Intangible Assets - Continued

Selected data by segment is as follows:


	Three Months Ended June 30				Six Months Ended June 30
	2004		2003		2004		2003
	(in millions of dollars, except share data)
Premium Income
Income Protection
Group Long-term Income Protection	$	630.5	$	603.2	$	1,260.3	$	1,180.3
Group Short-term Income Protection		155.9		159.0		313.0		313.5
Individual Income Protection – Recently Issued		128.9		124.3		258.7		249.2
Long-term Care		109.2		99.5		217.6		194.6

		1,024.5		986.0		2,049.6		1,937.6

Life and Accident
Group Life		394.9		383.3		783.7		754.4
Accidental Death & Dismemberment		45.5		51.9		92.6		102.5
Brokerage Voluntary Life and Other		55.8		50.3		110.0		99.1

		496.2		485.5		986.3		956.0

Colonial
Income Protection		120.7		115.5		239.7		230.4
Life		26.7		23.3		53.3		47.2
Other		36.6		32.9		72.1		64.7

		184.0		171.7		365.1		342.3

Individual Income Protection – Closed Block		249.2		260.4		500.5		529.0

Other		2.9		7.6		11.5		17.6

		1,956.8		1,911.2		3,913.0		3,782.5

Net Investment Income and Other Income
Income Protection		288.8		282.0		570.4		548.0
Life and Accident		49.7		50.8		99.1		100.9
Colonial		24.4		22.4		47.5		43.6
Individual Income Protection – Closed Block		210.1		234.3		450.9		452.1
Other		41.3		47.2		84.0		94.9
Corporate		24.7		7.8		29.2		13.6

		639.0		644.5		1,281.1		1,253.1

Operating Revenue (Excluding Net Realized Investment Gains and Losses)
Income Protection		1,313.3		1,268.0		2,620.0		2,485.6
Life and Accident		545.9		536.3		1,085.4		1,056.9
Colonial		208.4		194.1		412.6		385.9
Individual Income Protection – Closed Block		459.3		494.7		951.4		981.1
Other		44.2		54.8		95.5		112.5
Corporate		24.7		7.8		29.2		13.6

		2,595.8		2,555.7		5,194.1		5,035.6

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) - Continued

UnumProvident Corporation and Subsidiaries

June 30, 2004

Note 3 - Segment Information and Impairment of Intangible Assets - Continued


	Three Months Ended June 30						Six Months Ended June 30
	2004			2003			2004			2003
	(in millions of dollars, except share data)
Benefits and Expenses
Income Protection	$	1,222.5		$	1,169.5		$	2,454.9		$	2,762.6
Life and Accident		487.3			473.2			969.9			931.0
Colonial		169.0			158.7			336.6			315.3
Individual Income Protection – Closed Block		429.3			489.4			1,845.2			960.0
Other		33.7			48.0			77.9			94.0
Corporate		55.4			53.0			106.6			113.2

		2,397.2			2,391.8			5,791.1			5,176.1

Operating Income (Loss) Before Income Tax and Net Realized Investment Gain (Loss)
Income Protection		90.8			98.5			165.1			(277.0	)
Life and Accident		58.6			63.1			115.5			125.9
Colonial		39.4			35.4			76.0			70.6
Individual Income Protection – Closed Block		30.0			5.3			(893.8	)		21.1
Other		10.5			6.8			17.6			18.5
Corporate		(30.7	)		(45.2	)		(77.4	)		(99.6	)

	$	198.6		$	163.9		$	(597.0	)	$	(140.5	)

A reconciliation of total operating revenue and operating income (loss) by segment to revenue and net income (loss) as reported in the condensed consolidated statements of operations is as follows:


	Three Months Ended June 30						Six Months Ended June 30
	2004			2003			2004			2003
	(in millions of dollars)
Operating Revenue by Segment	$	2,595.8		$	2,555.7		$	5,194.1		$	5,035.6
Net Realized Investment Loss		(86.5	)		(26.5	)		(61.1	)		(111.6	)

Revenue	$	2,509.3		$	2,529.2		$	5,133.0		$	4,924.0

Operating Income (Loss) Before Income Tax and Net Realized Investment Loss	$	198.6		$	163.9		$	(597.0	)	$	(140.5	)
Net Realized Investment Loss		(86.5	)		(26.5	)		(61.1	)		(111.6	)
Income Tax (Benefit)		37.1			43.3			(163.8	)		(97.2	)
Income (Loss) from Discontinued Operations, Net of Income Tax		(67.8	)		4.4			(60.8	)		7.0

Net Income (Loss)	$	7.2		$	98.5		$	(555.1	)	$	(147.9	)

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) - Continued

UnumProvident Corporation and Subsidiaries

June 30, 2004

Note 3 - Segment Information and Impairment of Intangible Assets - Continued

Assets by segment are as follows:


	June 30 2004		December 31 2003
	(in millions of dollars)
Income Protection	$	16,935.8	$	16,625.9
Life and Accident		4,069.8		4,031.6
Colonial		2,040.4		2,023.0
Individual Income Protection – Closed Block		15,705.3		16,404.9
Other		8,812.0		9,270.9
Corporate		940.4		(70.6	)
Discontinued Operations		—		1,432.6

Total	$	48,503.7	$	49,718.3

Stockholders’ equity is allocated to the operating segments on the basis of an internal allocation formula that reflects the volume and risk components of each operating segment’s business and aligns allocated equity with the Company’s target capital levels for regulatory and rating agency purposes. The internal formula may result in a “negative” equity and “negative” asset amount remaining in the Corporate segment. This formula is modified periodically to recognize changes in the views of capital requirements.

Note 4 - Liability for Unpaid Claims and Claim Adjustment Expenses

The Company estimates the ultimate cost of settling claims in each reporting period based on the information available to management at that time. Claim reserves generally equal the Company’s estimate, at the end of the current reporting period, of the present value of the liability for future benefits and expenses to be paid on claims incurred as of that date. A claim reserve for a specific claim is based on assumptions derived from the Company’s actual historical experience. Consideration is given to current and historical trends in the Company’s experience and to expected deviations from historical experience.

Claim reserves are subject to revision as current claim experience and projections of future factors affecting claim experience change. In a reporting period, actual experience may deviate from the long-term assumptions used to determine the claim reserves. The Company reviews annually, or more frequently as appropriate, emerging experience to ensure that its claim reserves make adequate and reasonable provision for future benefits and expenses. This review includes the determination of a range of reasonable estimates within which the reserve must fall.

In April 2004, the Company completed an analysis of the assumptions related to its individual income protection – closed block claim reserves. The analysis was initiated based on the restructuring effective January 1, 2004, which reflected the individual income protection – closed block as a stand-alone segment. Previously these reserves were analyzed for the individual income protection line of business on a combined basis. Included in the analysis was a review of morbidity assumptions, primarily claim resolution rates, and claim reserve discount rate assumptions. Based upon this analysis, the Company lowered the claim reserve discount rate to reflect the segmentation of the investment portfolio between the individual income protection – recently issued business and the individual income protection – closed block business, the change in the Company’s investment portfolio yield rates during the first quarter of 2004, the Company’s expectation of future investment portfolio yield rates, and the Company’s desire to maintain the relationship between the claim reserve discount rate and the investment portfolio yield rate for the individual income protection – closed block at the Company’s long-term objective. The segmentation of the

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) - Continued

UnumProvident Corporation and Subsidiaries

June 30, 2004

Note 4 - Liability for Unpaid Claims and Claim Adjustment Expenses - Continued

investment portfolio was necessary to ensure appropriate matching of the duration of the assets and the related policy liabilities. Based on the April 2004 analysis, in the first quarter of 2004 the Company increased its individual income protection – closed block claim reserves by $110.6 million before tax, or $71.9 million after tax, to reflect its current estimate of future benefit obligations. The first quarter 2004 change represented a 1.2 percent increase in total net individual income protection – closed block reserves as of March 31, 2004, which for continuing operations equaled $9.530 billion prior to this increase.

In April 2003, the Company completed an analysis of the assumptions related to its group long-term income protection claim reserves. Included in the analysis was a review of active claim reserves, incurred but not reported (IBNR) reserves, and claim reopen reserves. An active claim reserve is established for future benefit payments when a claim is incurred and reported to the Company. IBNR reserves are established on claims which are estimated to have been incurred but not yet reported to the Company. Claim reopen reserves are established for those claimants who have previously recovered but who are anticipated to return to disabled status under the same disability and within a specified period of time, as contractually allowed by the disability policy. The analysis was initiated based on lower claim resolution rates observed during the first quarter of 2003. The claim resolution rate is the rate of probability that a disability claimant will recover, die, or reach maximum benefit limits and no longer receive benefit payments from the Company. Generally, claim resolution rates vary by the age of the claimant at the time of disability, duration or length of time since the disability initially occurred, and claim diagnosis. The claim resolution rates for group long-term income protection during the first quarter of 2003 were below levels anticipated for reserves and were lower than those experienced in the full years 2002, 2001, and 2000. The analysis indicated not only a decrease in overall claim resolution rates, but also a change in claim resolution rates by claim duration. The analysis of emerging claim resolution rates and the reasons driving the changes resulted in a reduction in the Company’s long-term expectations with respect to claim resolution rates. The Company’s long-term expectations applied to all claims incurred regardless of the date of incurral. In addition, the Company reviewed the reserve discount rate, which is the interest rate at which future cash flows for benefits and expenses to be paid are discounted to determine the current value of those cash flows. The Company concluded at that time that a change in its discount rate assumptions was not warranted. Based on the April 2003 analysis, in the first quarter of 2003 the Company increased its group long-term income protection claim reserves by $454.0 million before tax, or $295.1 million after tax, to reflect its current estimate of future benefit obligations. The active claim reserve for claims already reported to the Company and still in open claim status was increased by $516.0 million, the IBNR reserve was decreased by $23.0 million, and the reopen reserve was decreased by $39.0 million before tax. The first quarter 2003 change represented a 6.5 percent increase in total net group long-term income protection reserves as of March 31, 2003, which for continuing operations equaled $7.017 billion prior to this increase.

Note 5 - Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation

The Company has various stock-based employee compensation plans. Prior to 2003, the Company accounted for those plans under the recognition and measurement principles of Accounting Principles Board (APB) Opinion No. 25 (Opinion 25), Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, and related Interpretations. All options granted prior to 2003 under the stock-based employee compensation plans had an exercise price equal to the market value of the underlying common stock on the date of grant.

During the fourth quarter of 2003, the Company adopted the fair value recognition provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123 (SFAS 123), Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, and selected the prospective method of adoption allowed under the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 148 (SFAS 148), Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation – Transition and Disclosure. The recognition provisions are applied to all employee awards granted, modified, or settled after January 1, 2003. The adoption,

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) - Continued

UnumProvident Corporation and Subsidiaries

June 30, 2004

Note 5 - Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation - Continued

which was effective as of January 1, 2003, decreased after tax results for fourth quarter and full year 2003 approximately $0.6 million. The Company did not restate prior quarters of 2003 due to immateriality.

The expense recognized in the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2004 and 2003 for stock-based employee compensation was less than that which would have been recognized if the fair value method had been applied to all option awards granted after the original effective date of SFAS 123. Had the Company applied the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS 123 as of its original effective date, pro forma net income (loss) and net income (loss) per share would be as follows:


	Three Months Ended June 30						Six Months Ended June 30
	2004			2003			2004			2003
	(in millions of dollars, except share data)
Net Income (Loss), as Reported	$	7.2		$	98.5		$	(555.1	)	$	(147.9	)
Add: Stock-based Employee Compensation Expense Included in Net Income (Loss) as a Result of the Prospective Application Allowed under SFAS 148, Net of Tax		0.3			—			0.4			—
Deduct: Stock-based Employee Compensation Expense Determined under SFAS 123, Net of Tax		(1.1	)		(2.3	)		(2.3	)		(8.2	)

Pro Forma Net Income (Loss)	$	6.4		$	96.2		$	(557.0	)	$	(156.1	)

Net Income (Loss) Per Share:
Basic–as Reported	$	0.02		$	0.36		$	(1.88	)	$	(0.58	)
Basic–Pro Forma	$	0.02		$	0.35		$	(1.89	)	$	(0.61	)

Assuming Dilution–as Reported	$	0.02		$	0.36		$	(1.88	)	$	(0.58	)
Assuming Dilution–Pro Forma	$	0.02		$	0.35		$	(1.89	)	$	(0.61	)

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) - Continued

UnumProvident Corporation and Subsidiaries

June 30, 2004

Note 6 - Pensions and Other Postretirement Benefits

The components of net periodic benefit cost, including discontinued operations, related to the defined benefit pension and postretirement plans sponsored by the Company for its employees are as follows:


	U.S. Plans Pension Benefits						Non-U.S. Plans Pension Benefits						Postretirement Benefits
	Three Months Ended June 30
	2004			2003			2004			2003			2004			2003
	(in millions of dollars, except share data)
Service Cost	$	7.3		$	5.5		$	2.1		$	1.7		$	1.2		$	1.1
Interest Cost		9.3			8.4			1.4			1.2			2.8			3.6
Expected Return on Plan Assets		(8.9	)		(7.4	)		(1.1	)		(0.9	)		(0.1	)		(0.2	)
Amortization of Prior Service Cost		(0.7	)		(0.7	)		—			—			(0.9	)		(0.9	)
Amortization of Net Loss		4.0			4.5			0.6			0.5			—			0.5
Curtailment		—			—			0.7			—			(9.4	)		—

Net Periodic Benefit Cost (Credit)	$	11.0		$	10.3		$	3.7		$	2.5		$	(6.4	)	$	4.1


	U.S. Plans Pension Benefits						Non-U.S. Plans Pension Benefits						Postretirement Benefits
	Six Months Ended June 30
	2004			2003			2004			2003			2004			2003
	(in millions of dollars, except share data)
Service Cost	$	14.6		$	11.0		$	4.5		$	3.4		$	2.4		$	2.2
Interest Cost		18.6			16.9			3.0			2.4			5.6			7.2
Expected Return on Plan Assets		(17.8	)		(14.8	)		(2.4	)		(1.8	)		(0.3	)		(0.4	)
Amortization of Prior Service Cost		(1.4	)		(1.4	)		—			—			(1.8	)		(1.8	)
Amortization of Net Loss		8.0			9.0			1.2			0.9			—			1.0
Curtailment		—			—			0.7			—			(9.4	)		—

Net Periodic Benefit Cost (Credit)	$	22.0		$	20.7		$	7.0		$	4.9		$	(3.5	)	$	8.2

The Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement and Modernization Act of 2003 (the Medicare Act) was enacted in December 2003 to add a voluntary prescription drug benefit for Medicare-eligible retirees to be effective January 1, 2006. The Act allows an employer to choose whether or not to coordinate prescription drug benefits under a retiree medical plan with the Medicare prescription drug benefit or to keep the company plan design as it is and receive a subsidy from the federal government. The Company reviewed the options available as a result of Medicare reform and aligned the options, as appropriate, for each of its designated groups of retirees.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) - Continued

UnumProvident Corporation and Subsidiaries

June 30, 2004

Note 6 - Pensions and Other Postretirement Benefits - Continued

Based on a preliminary analysis of the Act, it appears that the Company’s retiree medical plans provided to certain current retirees qualify for a government subsidy under the Act without change to the plans. The Company has included the estimated impact of the subsidy in measuring the accumulated benefit obligation at June 30, 2004, resulting in a reduction of $6.5 million in the accumulated benefit obligation related to benefits attributed to past service. The effect of the subsidy had no impact on net periodic benefit cost in the second quarter of 2004, but is expected to reduce net periodic benefit cost approximately $0.4 million per year, beginning in the third quarter of 2004, due to a reduction in interest cost on the accumulated postretirement benefit obligation.

In June 2004, the Company amended its postretirement medical plan to coordinate with the Act so that Medicare is the primary payer of prescription drug benefits for current non-grandfathered retirees (those who do not qualify for the government subsidy) and active employees who meet certain age and service requirements. This plan change resulted in a reduction of $5.4 million in the accumulated benefit obligation. The effect of the subsidy had no impact on net periodic benefit cost in the second quarter of 2004, but is expected to reduce net periodic benefit cost approximately $0.8 million per year, beginning in the third quarter of 2004.

In June 2004, the Company also amended its postretirement medical plan to eliminate the premium subsidy for employees who had not reached a minimum age of 45 with minimum years of service on December 31, 2003. As a result of this amendment, the Company recorded a curtailment gain of $9.4 million before tax in the second quarter of 2004. The corresponding reduction to the accumulated benefit obligation was $3.4 million. Excluding the curtailment gain, the effect of the subsidy had no impact on net periodic benefit cost in the second quarter of 2004, but is expected to reduce net periodic benefit cost by approximately $1.2 million per year, beginning in the third quarter of 2004.

The effect of the Act and the plan changes described herein are considered a significant event, requiring liabilities for the postretirement benefit plan to be remeasured as of June 30, 2004. The weighted average assumption for the discount rate used in the measurement of the Company’s benefit obligations for the postretirement benefit plan changed from 6.10 percent as of December 31, 2003 to 6.40 percent as of June 30, 2004.

The Company also recorded a curtailment loss of $0.7 million during the second quarter of 2004 as a result of the termination of the Canadian defined benefit pension plan resulting from the sale of the Canadian branch.

Note 7 - Debt, Stockholders’ Equity, and Earnings Per Common Share

In May 2004, the Company issued 12,000,000 8.25% adjustable conversion-rate equity security units (units) in a private offering for $300.0 million. Each unit has a stated amount of $25 and will initially consist of (a) a contract pursuant to which the holder agrees to purchase, for $25, shares of the Company’s common stock on March 15, 2007 and (b) a 1/40 or 2.5% ownership interest in a senior note issued by the Company due May 15, 2009 with a principal amount of $1,000. Upon settlement of the common stock purchase contract and successful remarketing of the senior note element of the units, the Company will receive proceeds of approximately $300.0 million and will issue between 17.7 million and 20.4 million shares of common stock. The present value of the quarterly fee payments, which is included in other liabilities in the condensed consolidated statements of financial condition, and the related purchase contract issuance costs reduced additional paid-in capital by $27.6 million.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) - Continued

UnumProvident Corporation and Subsidiaries

June 30, 2004

Note 7 - Debt, Stockholders’ Equity, and Earnings Per Common Share - Continued

Net income (loss) per common share is determined as follows:


	Three Months Ended June 30				Six Months Ended June 30
	2004		2003		2004			2003
	( in millions of dollars, except share data)
Numerator
Net Income (Loss)	$	7.2	$	98.5	$	(555.1	)	$	(147.9	)

Denominator (000s)
Weighted Average Common Shares – Basic		295,161.3		272,564.1		295,092.3			257,184.7
Weighted Average Common Shares - Assuming Dilution		301,478.2		273,773.6		295,092.3			257,184.7

Net Income (Loss) Per Common Share
Basic	$	0.02	$	0.36	$	(1.88	)	$	(0.58	)
Assuming Dilution	$	0.02	$	0.36	$	(1.88	)	$	(0.58	)

In computing earnings per share assuming dilution, only potential common shares that are dilutive (those that reduce earnings per share) are included. Potential common shares are not used when computing earnings per share assuming dilution if the results would be antidilutive, such as when a net loss from continuing operations is reported or if options are out-of-the-money. In-the-money options to purchase approximately 2.4 million common shares for the six month period ended June 30, 2004 were not considered dilutive due to a net loss being reported for the period. In-the-money options for the six month period ended June 30, 2003 were immaterial. Options out-of-the-money approximated 14.7 million and 14.9 million for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2004, respectively, and 18.3 million and 17.2 million shares for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2003, respectively.

The Company accounts for the effect on the number of weighted average common shares, assuming dilution, using the treasury stock method. The purchase contract element of the Company’s adjustable conversion-rate equity security units issued in 2004 contributes to the number of weighted average common shares, assuming dilution, when the average market price of the Company’s common stock is above the threshold appreciation price of $16.95 per share. Because the average market price of the Company’s common stock during the period the units were outstanding was below this price, the shares issuable were excluded from the computation of net income (loss) per common share assuming dilution for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2004. The purchase contract element of the adjustable conversion-rate equity security units issued in 2003 contributes to the number of weighted average common shares, assuming dilution, when the average market price of the Company’s common stock is above the threshold appreciation price of $13.27 per share. Because the average market price of the Company’s common stock during the period was above this price, 5.0 million issuable shares would have been included in the computation of earnings per common share assuming dilution for the six month period ended June 30, 2004, had the Company not reported a net loss from continuing operations.

The Company has 25,000,000 shares of preferred stock authorized with a par value of $0.10 per share. No preferred stock has been issued to date.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) - Continued

UnumProvident Corporation and Subsidiaries

June 30, 2004

Note 8 - Comprehensive Income (Loss)

The components of accumulated other comprehensive income, net of deferred tax, are as follows:


	June 30 2004			December 31 2003
	(in millions of dollars)
Net Unrealized Gain on Securities	$	672.3		$	1,081.0
Net Gain on Cash Flow Hedges		136.3			157.8
Foreign Currency Translation Adjustment		63.3			57.7
Minimum Pension Liability Adjustment		(125.3	)		(125.3	)

Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income	$	746.6		$	1,171.2

The components of comprehensive income (loss) and the related deferred tax are as follows:


	Three Months Ended June 30						Six Months Ended June 30
	2004			2003			2004			2003
	(in millions of dollars)
Net Income (Loss)	$	7.2		$	98.5		$	(555.1	)	$	(147.9	)

Change in Net Unrealized Gain on Securities:
Change Before Reclassification Adjustment		(1,119.4	)		739.2			(539.5	)		635.9
Reclassification Adjustment for Net Realized
Investment Loss - Continuing Operations		86.5			26.5			61.1			111.6
Reclassification Adjustment for Net Realized
Investment Gain (Loss) - Discontinued Operations		(140.6	)		(0.1	)		(139.4	)		3.0
Change in Net Gain on Cash Flow Hedges		(136.7	)		52.2			(33.0	)		51.6
Change in Foreign Currency Translation Adjustment		(11.3	)		61.2			1.9			88.3

		(1,321.5	)		879.0			(648.9	)		890.4
Change in Deferred Tax		(452.6	)		296.9			(224.3	)		325.2

Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)		(868.9	)		582.1			(424.6	)		565.2

Comprehensive Income (Loss)	$	(861.7	)	$	680.6		$	(979.7	)	$	417.3

Note 9 - Commitments and Contingent Liabilities

Paul Revere Brokers, Career Agents, and Sales Managers Actions

In 1997 two alleged class action lawsuits were filed in Superior Court in Worcester, Massachusetts (Superior Court) against UnumProvident Corporation (UnumProvident) and several of its subsidiaries, The Paul Revere Corporation (Paul Revere), The Paul Revere Life Insurance Company, The Paul Revere Variable Annuity Insurance Company, and Provident Life and Accident Insurance Company. One purported to represent independent brokers who sold certain individual disability income policies with benefit riders that were issued by subsidiaries of Paul Revere and who claimed that their compensation had been reduced in breach of their broker contract and in violation of the Massachusetts Consumer Protection Act (the Massachusetts Act). A class was certified in February 2000. In April 2001, the jury returned a complete defense verdict on the breach of contract claim. Notwithstanding the jury verdict,

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) - Continued

UnumProvident Corporation and Subsidiaries

June 30, 2004

Note 9 - Commitments and Contingent Liabilities - Continued

the judge was obligated to rule separately on the claim that UnumProvident and its affiliates violated the Massachusetts Act. In September 2002, the judge ruled that Paul Revere violated the Massachusetts Act and awarded double damages plus attorneys’ fees. Complicating the matter was the unexpected death of the trial judge. In March 2003, a new judge was assigned to the case so the parties can proceed to conclude matters before the trial court. As to calculating damages, interest, and attorneys’ fees, as of July of 2004 almost all of these issues had been resolved, and the case should be perfected for appeal by the end of the third quarter. The Company feels strongly that the judge’s ruling that the Massachusetts Act was violated is contrary to both the law and the facts of the case and plans to appeal after the judgment is made final.

The career agent class action purports to represent all career agents of subsidiaries of Paul Revere whose employment relationships ended on June 30, 1997 and who were offered contracts to sell insurance policies as independent producers. The career agents claimed that the termination of their employment relationship was contrary, inter alia, to promises of lifetime employment. Class certification was denied for the career agents. The career agent plaintiffs have since re-filed their complaint seeking class action status by limiting the issues to compensation matters similar to those in the certified broker class action. A motion for certification of a class with respect to this narrower claim was filed, but has not been acted upon.

In addition, the same plaintiffs’ attorney who had initially filed the class action lawsuits filed approximately 50 (including the two individual career agents who brought the class action referenced above) individual lawsuits on behalf of current and former Paul Revere sales managers alleging various breach of contract claims. Of the 48 general manager cases, one was arbitrated and all the others have been settled. UnumProvident and its affiliates believe that they have strong defenses for the two individual career agent cases and plan to vigorously defend their position in the remaining cases. Management expects that the ultimate liability, if any, with respect to these suits, after consideration of the amount accrued, will not be material to the Company’s consolidated financial position or results of operations.

Putative Class Actions and Shareholder Derivative Actions

On May 22, 2003, UnumProvident, several of its subsidiaries, and some of their officers and directors filed a motion with the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation seeking to transfer more than twenty class actions and derivative suits now pending against them in various federal district courts to a single district for coordinated or consolidated pre-trial proceedings. Each of these actions, discussed below, contends, among other things, that the defendants engaged in improper claims handling practices in violation of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) or various state laws or failed to disclose the effects of those practices in violation of the federal securities laws. On September 2, 2003, the Judicial Panel on the Multidistrict Litigation entered an order transferring these cases, described below, to the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings. These lawsuits are in a very preliminary stage, the outcome is uncertain, and the Company is unable to estimate a range of reasonably possible losses. Reserves have not been established for these matters. An adverse outcome in one or more of these actions could, depending on the nature, scope, and amount of the ruling, materially adversely affect the Company’s consolidated results of operations in a period.

Shareholder Derivative Actions

On November 22, 2002, the first of five purported shareholder derivative actions, Ferrari, Derivatively on Behalf of Nominal Defendant UnumProvident Corporation v. Armstrong, et al., was filed in the State of Tennessee Chancery Court of Hamilton County. Between December 27, 2002 and March 11, 2003, four additional purported derivative actions were filed in Tennessee state court or the United District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee, styled

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) - Continued

UnumProvident Corporation and Subsidiaries

June 30, 2004

Note 9 - Commitments and Contingent Liabilities - Continued

Lerner v. Armstrong, et al., Friedman v. Chandler, et al., Levy v. Chandler, et al., and Patterson v. Chandler, et al. The defendants removed each of the actions that were filed in Tennessee state court to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee. On October 23, 2003, the district court denied motions filed by the plaintiffs to remand those actions back to Tennessee state court.

Each of these actions purport to be a shareholder’s derivative action brought for the benefit of nominal defendant UnumProvident Corporation against certain current and past members of its Board of Directors and certain executive officers seeking to remedy alleged breaches of fiduciary duties and other violations of claims paying law. Plaintiffs allege, among other things, that the individual defendants established and perpetuated an illegal and improper policy of denying legitimate disability claims, engaged in improper financial reporting, and for certain defendants, engaged in insider trading. Further, plaintiffs allege as a result of their responsibility for and knowledge of the Company’s policies and practices, the individual defendants knew that the Company was violating various state and federal laws, including the federal securities laws, thus exposing the Company to liability and damages. Plaintiff alleges these acts violated, among other things, their fiduciary duties of good faith and loyalty.

On October 17, 2003, the district court consolidated these actions under the caption In re UnumProvident Corporation Derivative Actions. On April 19, 2004, the plaintiffs filed a single consolidated amended complaint. The defendants have not yet answered or otherwise responded to the consolidated complaint. The defendants strongly deny the allegations in the complaints and will vigorously defend both the substantive and procedural aspects of the litigation.

Federal Securities Law Class Actions

On February 12, 2003, the first of five virtually identical alleged securities class action suits styled Knisley v. UnumProvident Corporation, et al., was filed in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee. On February 27, 2003, a sixth complaint entitled Martin v. UnumProvident Corporation, et al., was filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, and later was transferred to the Eastern District of Tennessee by agreement of the parties. In two orders dated May 21, 2003 and January 22, 2004, the district court consolidated these actions under the caption In re UnumProvident Corp. Securities Litigation. On November 6, 2003, the district court entered an order appointing a Lead Plaintiff in the consolidated action.

On January 9, 2004, the Lead Plaintiff filed its consolidated amended complaint. The Lead Plaintiff seeks to represent a putative class of purchasers of UnumProvident Corporation publicly traded securities between March 30, 2000 and April 24, 2003. The plaintiffs allege, among other things, that the Company issued misleading financial statements, improperly accounted for certain impaired investments, failed to properly estimate its disability claim reserves, and pursued certain improper claims handling practices. The complaint asserts claims under Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 thereunder. On March 19, 2004, the defendants filed a motion to dismiss the consolidated amended complaint, which has not as of yet been ruled upon by the court.

On May 7, 2003, Azzolini v. CorTs Trust II for Provident Financial Trust, et al., was filed in the Southern District of New York. This is a federal securities law class action brought by the plaintiff on behalf of himself and a purported Class consisting of all persons who purchased UnumProvident Corporate-Backed Trust Securities (CorTs) certificates pursuant to an initial public offering by an entity unaffiliated with the Company on or about April 18, 2001 through March 24, 2003. Plaintiff seeks to recover damages caused by UnumProvident’s and certain underwriter defendants’ alleged violations of the Securities Act of 1933 and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Plaintiff asserts that UnumProvident issued and/or failed to correct false and misleading financial statements and press releases concerning the Company’s publicly reported revenues and earnings directed to the investing public.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) - Continued

UnumProvident Corporation and Subsidiaries

June 30, 2004

Note 9 - Commitments and Contingent Liabilities - Continued

Three additional actions alleging similar claims and purporting to be class actions were filed, two in the Southern District of New York, Strahle v. CorTs Trust II for Provident Financing Trust I, et al., and Finke v. CorTs Trust II for Provident Financing Trust I, et al., filed on March 23, 2003 and May 15, 2003, respectively, and the third in the Eastern District of New York, Bernstein v. CorTs for Provident Financing Trust I, et al., filed on July 7, 2003. These actions all have been transferred to the Eastern District of Tennessee for coordinated pre-trial proceedings. On February 18, 2004, the court consolidated each of these actions other than the Bernstein action under the Azzolini caption. The Bernstein action makes identical allegations as the other actions, but with respect to a different series of CorTs securities.

On March 19, 2004, amended complaints were filed in both the Azzolini and Bernstein actions. The amended complaints assert claims under Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 thereunder against UnumProvident and one of its officers. The Azzolini plaintiff seeks to represent a putative class of purchasers of certain CorTs certificates between March 21, 2001 and March 24, 2003. The Bernstein plaintiff seeks to represent a putative class of purchasers of a different series of CorTs certificates between February 8, 2001 and March 10, 2003. On April 19, 2004, the defendants moved to dismiss the complaints in each of these actions. The court has not as of yet ruled on those motions.

Discovery is stayed in each of these actions pursuant to the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. The court entered a schedule providing for the completion of all pretrial proceedings in these actions by December 2005. The Company denies the allegations and will vigorously defend against the allegations raised by the complaints.

Policyholder Class Actions

On July 15, 2002, the case of Rombeiro v. Unum Life Insurance Company of America, et al., was filed in the Superior Court of Sonoma County, California. It was subsequently removed to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. On January 21, 2003, a First Amended Complaint was filed, purporting to be a class action. This complaint alleges that plaintiff individually was wrongfully denied disability benefits under a group long-term disability plan and alleges breach of state law fiduciary duties on behalf of himself and others covered by similar plans whose disability benefits have been denied or terminated after a claim was made. The complaint seeks, among other things, injunctive and declaratory relief and payment of benefits. On April 30, 2003, the court granted in part and denied in part the defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint. On May 14, 2003, the plaintiff filed a Second Amended Complaint seeking injunctive relief on behalf of a putative nationwide class of long-term disability insurance policyholders. The Company denies the allegations in the complaint and will vigorously defend the litigation and any attempt to certify the putative class. This action was transferred to the Eastern District of Tennessee as part of the multidistrict litigation transfer order.

On November 4, 2002, the case of Keir, et al. v. UnumProvident Corporation, et al., was filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. This case purports to be a class action on behalf of a putative class of group long-term disability participants insured under ERISA plans whose claims were denied or terminated on or after June 30, 1999. The amended complaint alleges that these claimants had their claims improperly challenged and allege that the Company and its insurance subsidiaries breached certain fiduciary duties owed to these participants in ERISA plans in which the Company is the claims adjudicator. The Company maintains that the allegations are false and that the claims, as framed, are not permissible under ERISA’s carefully structured avenues of relief. On April 29, 2003, the court denied the defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint. The Company denies the allegations in the complaint and will vigorously defend the litigation and any attempt to certify the putative class. This action was transferred to the Eastern District of Tennessee as part of the multidistrict litigation transfer order.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) - Continued

UnumProvident Corporation and Subsidiaries

June 30, 2004

Note 9 - Commitments and Contingent Liabilities - Continued

On February 11, 2003, the case of Harris, et al. v. UnumProvident Corporation, et al., was filed in the Circuit Court of St. Clair County, Illinois. This case purports to be a class action. The complaint alleges that individuals were wrongfully denied benefits and alleges causes of action under breach of contract, breach of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing, violation of the Illinois Consumer Fraud Act, common law fraud, intentional misrepresentation, and breach of fiduciary duty on behalf of a putative class of policyholders. Alternatively, the complaint alleges violations of ERISA. The complaint seeks injunctive and declaratory relief as well as restitution and punitive damages. On April 4, 2003, the case was removed to the United States District Court for the Southern District of Illinois. The Company denies the allegations in the complaint and will vigorously defend the litigation and any attempt to certify the putative class. This action was transferred to the Eastern District of Tennessee as part of the multidistrict litigation transfer order.

On February 25, 2003, the case of Davis, et al. v. UnumProvident Corporation, et al., was filed in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. The plaintiffs are seeking representative status as a class of disability participants insured under ERISA plans. The complaint alleges that these claimants had their claims improperly denied or terminated and that the Company breached certain fiduciary duties owed to these participants in ERISA plans. The complaint also alleges violations under the federal Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO). The complaint seeks reversal of claim denials or contract rescissions and re-determination by an independent person of claims of the named plaintiffs and others similarly situated, appointment of a master to oversee certain claim handling matters, and treble damages under RICO. The Company denies the allegations in the complaint and will vigorously defend the litigation and any attempt to certify the putative class. This action was transferred to the Eastern District of Tennessee as part of the multidistrict litigation transfer order.

On April 30, 2003, the case of Taylor v. UnumProvident Corporation, et al., was filed in the Circuit Court for Shelby County, Tennessee in the Thirteenth Judicial District at Memphis. The plaintiff seeks to represent all individuals who were insured by long-term disability policies issued by subsidiaries of UnumProvident and who did not obtain their coverage through employer sponsored plans and who had a claim denied, terminated, or suspended by a UnumProvident subsidiary after January 1, 1995. Plaintiff alleges that UnumProvident Corporation and its subsidiaries employed various unfair claim practices in assessing entitlement to benefits by class members during this period and, as a result, wrongfully denied legitimate claims. The plaintiff and the class seek contractual, equitable, and injunctive relief. On June 9, 2003, the defendants removed this action to the United States District Court for the Western District of Tennessee. The Company denies the allegations in the complaint and will vigorously defend the litigation and any attempt to certify the putative class. This action was transferred to the Eastern District of Tennessee as part of the multidistrict litigation transfer order.

On July 18, 2003, Contreras v. UnumProvident Corporation, et al., was filed in the Southern District of New York. Plaintiffs allege claims on behalf of a putative class of ERISA plan participants, beneficiaries, third-party beneficiaries, or assignees of group long-term disability insurance issued by the insuring subsidiaries of UnumProvident, who have had a disability claim denied, terminated, or suspended by UnumProvident on or after June 30, 1999. Plaintiffs assert bad faith claims practices by UnumProvident in violation of ERISA. Plaintiffs seek equitable and injunctive relief to require, among other things, that UnumProvident re-evaluate all previously denied, terminated, or suspended claims. The Company denies the allegations in the complaint and will vigorously defend the litigation and any attempt to certify the putative class. This action was transferred to the Eastern District of Tennessee as part of the multidistrict litigation transfer order.

On September 17, 2003, the case of Rudrud, et al. v. UnumProvident Corporation, et al., was filed in the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts. The plaintiffs assert claims on behalf of a putative class of disability participants insured under ERISA plans. The complaint alleges that these claimants had their claims improperly denied or terminated and that the Company breached certain fiduciary duties owed to these participants

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) - Continued

UnumProvident Corporation and Subsidiaries

June 30, 2004

Note 9 - Commitments and Contingent Liabilities - Continued

in ERISA plans. The complaint also alleges violations under RICO and Massachusetts state law. The complaint seeks payment of benefits, reversal of claim denials or contract rescissions and re-determination by an independent person of claims of the named plaintiffs and others similarly situated, appointment of a master to oversee certain claim handling matters, restitution and damages, and treble damages under RICO. The Company denies the allegations in the complaint and will vigorously defend the litigation and any attempt to certify the putative class. This action was transferred to the Eastern District of Tennessee as part of the multidistrict litigation order.

On November 13, 2003, the case of Dauphinee, et al. v. UnumProvident, et al., was filed in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee. This action is brought as a putative class action lawsuit on behalf of representative plaintiffs and all disabled individuals insured under a UnumProvident long-term disability plan. The complaint alleges that UnumProvident and its subsidiaries fraudulently and otherwise unlawfully denied and terminated long-term disability insurance benefits. Additionally, the complaint alleges misuse of authority as an ERISA claims fiduciary. The complaint seeks injunctive and declaratory relief to require, among other things, that UnumProvident re-evaluate all previously denied, terminated, or suspended claims. The Company denies the allegations in the complaint and will vigorously defend the litigation and any attempt to certify the putative class.

On December 22, 2003, the Tennessee Federal District Court entered an order consolidating all of the above actions other than the Taylor action for all pretrial purposes under the caption In re UnumProvident Corp. ERISA Benefit Denial Actions. Among other things, the court in that order appointed a lead counsel in the actions and directed lead counsel to file a consolidated amended complaint in the ERISA Benefit Denial Actions, which was filed on February 20, 2004. On March 26, 2004, the defendants answered the complaints in these actions, and simultaneously filed a motion for judgment on the pleadings in the ERISA Benefit Denial Actions. The court has not yet ruled upon that motion.

The parties have engaged in certain limited discovery in connection with a court-ordered mediation to take place later this year, as well as certain discovery on the merits of the claims asserted in the actions.

On April 9, 2004, the plaintiffs in Taylor and in the ERISA Benefit Denial Actions separately filed motions seeking certification of a plaintiff class. The defendants opposed each of those motions. The court has not yet ruled upon the motions.

The court entered a schedule providing for the completion of all pretrial proceedings in these actions by December 2005. The Company denies the allegations in the complaints and will vigorously defend the litigation and any attempt to certify the putative class.

Plan Beneficiary Class Actions

On April 29, 2003, the case of Gee v. UnumProvident Corporation, et al., was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee on behalf of a putative class of participants and beneficiaries of UnumProvident’s 401(k) Retirement Plan (“Plan”). Similar allegations were raised in Scanlon v. UnumProvident Corp., et al., filed May 16, 2003, in the Eastern District of Tennessee.

On October 2, 2003, the court issued an order consolidating these cases for all purposes. On January 9, 2004, plaintiffs filed their consolidated amended complaint against UnumProvident, several of its Officers and Directors, and several Plan fiduciaries, purportedly on behalf of a putative class of Plan participants and beneficiaries during the period since November 17, 1999. Plaintiffs allege that the named defendants violated the fiduciary provisions of ERISA by making direct and indirect communications to Plan participants that included material misrepresentations and omissions regarding investment in UnumProvident stock. Further, the plaintiffs allege the defendants failed to take action to protect participants from losses sustained from investment in the Plan’s UnumProvident Stock Fund.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) - Continued

UnumProvident Corporation and Subsidiaries

June 30, 2004

Note 9 - Commitments and Contingent Liabilities - Continued

On February 26, 2004, the defendants filed a motion to dismiss contending that the complaint failed to state a valid claim under ERISA. That motion has not as of yet been ruled upon by the court.

The parties have engaged in certain limited document discovery in this action on issues unique to this action that are not raised in the other action.

The court entered a schedule providing for the completion of all pretrial proceedings in these actions by December 2005. The defendants strongly deny the allegations in the complaints and will vigorously defend the litigation.

Claim Litigation

The Company and its insurance company subsidiaries, as part of their normal operations in managing disability claims, are engaged in claim litigation where disputes arise as a result of a denial or termination of benefits. Most typically those lawsuits are filed on behalf of a single claimant or policyholder, and in some of these individual actions punitive damages are sought, such as claims alleging bad faith in the handling of insurance claims. For claim litigation, the Company and its insurance company subsidiaries maintain reserves based on experience to satisfy judgments and settlements in the normal course. Management expects that the ultimate liability, if any, with respect to claim litigation, after consideration of the reserves maintained, will not be material to the consolidated financial condition of the Company. Nevertheless, given the inherent unpredictability of litigation, it is possible that an adverse outcome in certain claim litigation involving punitive damages could, from time to time, have a material adverse effect on the Company’s consolidated results of operations in a period. The Company is unable to estimate a range of reasonably possible punitive losses.

On January 23, 2003, a jury in California State Court in Marin County, in the case of Chapman v. UnumProvident Corporation, et al., returned a verdict of $31.6 million against UnumProvident and two of its subsidiaries, The Paul Revere Life Insurance Company and Provident Life and Accident Insurance Company. The largest portion of the verdict was $30.0 million in punitive damages. The Company strongly disagreed with the verdict because the evidence did not support it. The Company filed post-trial motions which challenged, among other things, the excessiveness of the punitive damage award. On March 25, 2003, the court entered an order reducing the punitive damage award to $5.0 million, thereby reducing the total award to $6.1 million. On April 8, 2003, the plaintiff in the Chapman case accepted the reduced award. The Company has now appealed the final verdict to the California Court of Appeals.

On April 2, 2003, a jury in Phoenix, Arizona Federal Court in the case of Ceimo v. General American Life Insurance Company, Provident Life and Accident Insurance Company, and The Paul Revere Life Insurance Company returned a verdict of $85.6 million against General American Life Insurance Company and two subsidiaries of UnumProvident, Provident Life and Accident Insurance Company and The Paul Revere Life Insurance Company. This verdict included an award of $79.0 million in punitive damages. The Company filed all of the required post-trial motions. On September 17, 2003, the trial court ordered a reduction of the punitive damage verdict from $79.0 million to $7.0 million in punitive damages. The court’s ruling as to the reduction in punitive damages was based on the United States Supreme Court’s decision in State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. Campbell. The remainder of the verdict was upheld, and the court awarded the plaintiff $0.6 million in attorneys’ fees. The Company has appealed the case to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. The plaintiff Joanne Ceimo filed a notice of cross-appeal on October 7, 2003 seeking to reinstate the full amount of punitive damages awarded by the jury. As of August 3, 2004, the briefing for the appeal in the Ninth Circuit was not yet complete.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) - Continued

UnumProvident Corporation and Subsidiaries

June 30, 2004

Note 9 - Commitments and Contingent Liabilities - Continued

On December 11, 2003, the case of Jewel, et al. v. UnumProvident Corporation, et al., was filed in the Worcester County Superior Court, Commonwealth of Massachusetts. The Company received service of this matter on March 8, 2004. Plaintiffs seek to represent all individual long-term disability policyholders and all participants in group long-term disability plans which are not covered by ERISA who (a) had coverage issued by an insuring subsidiary and (b) whose claims for long-term disability benefits were denied, or whose payments of long-term disability benefits were terminated or suspended, on or after July 1, 1999. Plaintiffs allege that the defendants employed various unfair claim practices and seek declaratory, contractual, and injunctive relief. On April 20, 2004, the defendants answered the complaint by denying generally the allegations and asserting various defenses. On July 15, 2004, plaintiffs filed a motion seeking to certify a plaintiff class. The defendants have not yet responded to that motion. The Company denies the allegations in the complaint and will vigorously defend the litigation and any attempt to certify the putative class.

On July 17, 2003, a qui tam action, The State of California ex rel. Linda Nee and John Metz v. UnumProvident Corporation, et al., was filed under seal in the Superior Court of the State of California, County of Los Angeles. On April 16, 2004, UnumProvident was notified that the Insurance Commissioner decided not to bring an action which permitted the case to go forward with private plaintiffs. The complaint alleges unlawful sales, marketing, and claims handling practices, including delaying or limiting payment for, denying, or terminating claims by California claimants and/or claims that are handled by UnumProvident’s Glendale or other claims centers. The complaint seeks civil penalties and assessments, attorneys fees and cost, interest and such other relief as the court deems proper for violation of California Insurance Code § 1871.7(b). In addition, the complaint seeks injunctive relief. The Company denies the allegations in the complaint and will vigorously defend the litigation.

From time to time class action allegations are pursued, as in Jewel, where the claimant or policyholder purports to represent a larger number of individuals who are similarly situated. Since each insurance claim is evaluated based on its own merits, there is rarely a single act or series of actions, which can properly be addressed by a class action. Nevertheless, the Company monitors these cases closely and defends itself appropriately where these allegations are made.

Other Claim Related Examinations and Investigations

The Company has experienced increased market conduct examinations by state insurance departments focused specifically on its disability claims handling policies and practices. On March 19, 2003, the Company consented to the entry of an order by the Georgia Insurance Commissioner that, among other things, ordered four of the Company’s insurance subsidiaries to each pay a monetary penalty of $250,000 and to adhere to certain claims handling practices. The order also placed these four companies on regulatory probation for two years, during which period certain Georgia claims and complaints will be reviewed on a quarterly basis by representatives of the Georgia Department of Insurance. The Georgia order did not cite any violations of Georgia law or regulations.

Because of the number of market conduct examinations initiated during 2002 and 2003, a coordinated market conduct examination of the Company’s disability claims handling policies and practices was organized during 2003 by Massachusetts, Maine, and Tennessee, the states of domicile for several of the Company’s insurance subsidiaries. Currently 44 states and the District of Columbia are participating in this coordinated examination in which the domiciliary states are attempting to address common state concerns and also eliminate or reduce the number of duplicative individual examinations by multiple states. California, Arizona, Minnesota, and New Mexico have chosen to continue pursuing their own examinations and investigations, although California and Minnesota have elected to participate in the multi-state examination as well. Additional state market conduct examinations may be commenced.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) - Continued

UnumProvident Corporation and Subsidiaries

June 30, 2004

Note 9 - Commitments and Contingent Liabilities - Continued

In addition, the Company received a letter in September 2003 from the office of the New York State Attorney General indicating that it is reviewing the disability claims-handling procedures of the Company and its insurance subsidiaries. In June 2004, the Company received a subpoena from the office of the New York State Attorney General requesting documents and information relating to compensation and commissions paid by the Company and its subsidiaries to insurance brokers. The Company is cooperating and is in the process of gathering and providing information in response to both requests.

In a letter dated March 25, 2004, the U.S. Department of Labor informed the Company that it was conducting an examination pursuant to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) of the benefit plans the Company provides to its employees and the products and services provided to third party plans. The Company is cooperating and is in the process of gathering and providing information in response.

These regulatory examinations and investigations could result in, among other things, changes in the Company’s claims handling and other business practices, increases in policy liabilities, reopening of closed or denied claims, changes in governance and other oversight procedures, fines, and other administrative action. Such results, singly or in combination, could injure the Company’s reputation, cause negative publicity, and impair the Company’s ability to sell or retain insurance policies, thereby adversely affecting the Company’s business, and potentially materially adversely affecting the consolidated results of operations in a period. Determination by regulatory authorities that the Company or its insurance subsidiaries have engaged in improper conduct could also adversely affect the Company’s defense of various lawsuits described herein.

Other Litigation

In certain reinsurance pools associated with the Company’s reinsurance businesses there are disputes among the pool members and reinsurance participants concerning the scope of their obligations and liabilities within the complex pool arrangements, including pools for which subsidiaries of the Company acted either as pool managers or underwriting agents, as pool members or as reinsurers. The Company or the Company’s subsidiaries either have been or may in the future be brought into disputes, arbitration proceedings, or litigation with other pool members or reinsurers of the pools in the process of resolving the various claims.

Various other lawsuits against the Company have arisen in the normal course of its business. Contingent liabilities that might arise from such other litigation incurred in the normal course of business are not deemed likely to materially adversely affect the consolidated financial position or results of operations of the Company.

Note 10 - Acquisitions and Dispositions

The Company sold its Canadian branch effective April 30, 2004, as more fully discussed in Note 2.

In June 2004, the Company acquired Integrated Benefits Management, a provider of case management services, at a price of $0.7 million. This acquisition will further broaden the relationship and distribution partnerships of the Company’s wholly-owned subsidiary, GENEX Services, Inc.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) - Continued

UnumProvident Corporation and Subsidiaries

June 30, 2004

Note 10 - Acquisitions and Dispositions - Continued

In January 2004, the Company sold its wholly-owned subsidiary Unum Japan Accident Insurance Co., Ltd. to Hitachi Capital Corporation (Hitachi) for $23.5 million. The Company received $18.8 million and recorded a receivable of $4.7 million due in January 2006, net of indemnification claims, if any. The Japanese operation was classified as an asset held for sale during the fourth quarter of 2003. At that time, the Company recognized an impairment loss of $1.2 million before tax and $0.8 million after tax. The Company also recognized a tax benefit of $6.8 million. In conjunction with the sale, the Company entered into an agreement with Hitachi to reinsure certain existing income protection business and intends to have a continuing presence in the operation for at least one year.

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

Board of Directors and Shareholders

UnumProvident Corporation

We have reviewed the condensed consolidated statement of financial condition of UnumProvident Corporation and subsidiaries as of June 30, 2004, and the related condensed consolidated statements of operations for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2004 and 2003, and the condensed statements of stockholders’ equity and cash flows for the six month periods ended June 30, 2004 and 2003. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management.

We conducted our reviews in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). A review of interim financial information consists principally of applying analytical procedures to financial data, and making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and accounting matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, which will be performed for the full year with the objective of expressing an opinion regarding the financial statements taken as a whole. Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.

Based on our reviews, we are not aware of any material modifications that should be made to the condensed consolidated financial statements referred to above for them to be in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

We have previously audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated statement of financial condition of UnumProvident Corporation as of December 31, 2003, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for the year then ended not presented herein, and in our report dated February 4, 2004, except for Note 15, for which the date is March 8, 2004, we expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements. In our opinion, the information set forth in the accompanying condensed consolidated statement of financial condition as of December 31, 2003, is fairly stated, in all material respects, in relation to the consolidated statement of financial condition from which it has been derived.

/s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Chattanooga, Tennessee

August 4, 2004

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Overview

UnumProvident Corporation (the Company) is the parent holding company for a group of insurance and non-insurance companies that collectively operate throughout North America and the United Kingdom. The Company’s principal operating subsidiaries in the United States are Unum Life Insurance Company of America, Provident Life and Accident Insurance Company, The Paul Revere Life Insurance Company, and Colonial Life & Accident Insurance Company, and in the United Kingdom, Unum Limited.

The Company is the largest provider of group and individual income protection insurance products and a leading provider of life, accident, and long-term care products in the United States and the United Kingdom. Through its U.S. brokerage operation, which in 2003 represented approximately 82 percent of total segment operating revenue, the Company markets a portfolio of group, individual, and voluntary benefit products and services to employers and their employees, as well as offering a limited number of products to individual customers. The Company believes that its product line, its commitment to high quality service, and its claims management approach position the organization well to compete in this highly competitive business. In addition to competition, portions of the Company’s business are sensitive to economic and financial market factors, including consumer confidence, employment levels, and the level of interest rates.

Highlights of Second Quarter 2004 Results

•

Although still performing below the Company’s long-term expectations, the Company believes that its U.S. group income protection business is showing improvement due to the actions taken over the past several quarters to increase the profitability in this business, as evidenced by the decline in the benefit ratio in the first and second quarters of 2004. The Company also believes that improvements in the economic environment, such as an increase in the U.S. Treasury note interest rate, improved consumer confidence, and an increase in new jobs, as well as the Company’s focus on a balanced mix of profitable business and a disciplined approach to pricing, renewals, and risk selection, will ultimately contribute to enhanced operating results.

•

The Company’s U.S. brokerage lines of business, the U.K. operation, and the Colonial segment all reported results generally in line with the Company’s expectations for the second quarter.

•

Consistent with the first quarter of 2004, the Company reported improved 2004 statutory results compared to the previous year. The Company’s insurance subsidiaries’ statutory combined net gain from operations was $326.7 million in the second quarter of 2004, and statutory combined net income, which includes realized net investment gains and losses, was $298.6 million. Included in the second quarter of 2004 was a one-time reinsurance premium of $123.0 million after tax for the reinsurance agreements for the individual income protection closed block business which was expensed for statutory reporting and a $250.6 million after tax statutory gain on the sale of the Canadian branch, comprised of a $270.8 million after tax gain included in net gain from operations and a realized after tax investment loss of $20.2 million. Excluding these one-time items, the second quarter of 2004 statutory net gain from operations was $178.9 million, compared to $57.0 million in last year’s second quarter, and statutory net income for the second quarter of 2004 was $171.0 million, compared to $49.6 million in the second quarter of 2003.

Challenges

There are several issues which have been a focus of investors. These include:

•

rating agency downgrades and the potential pressure on new sales and the persistency of the existing block;

•

the ultimate resolution of the multistate market conduct examination and the multidistrict litigation;

•

confidence in management’s ability to successfully execute the business plan;

•

general balance sheet concerns including the capitalization of the Company and the remaining intangible assets; and

•

the performance and potential risk associated with the closed block of individual income protection business, specifically concerns regarding reserves and overall profitability.

The Company believes it has made and continues to make progress in addressing these concerns. The Company is proactively meeting with customers and brokers to discuss recent rating agency actions and the Company’s improved financial position and performance. The Company believes that the improvement in statutory earnings is illustrative of management’s ability to successfully improve profitability in its U.S. brokerage business. Additionally, the Company has improved its risk-based capital position for its U.S. insurance subsidiaries and increased the Company’s overall balance sheet strength through the combined 2004 and 2003 equity and equity-related securities offerings of $1.450 billion, the strengthening of existing claim reserves for its group income protection business, the reduction in the Company’s holdings in below-investment-grade securities, the restructuring of the individual income protection closed block of business, and the sale or reinsurance of several non-core businesses and product lines.

The remaining sections of Item 2 discuss the significant transactions and events of the first six months of 2004 and 2003, critical accounting policies, segment operating results, discontinued operations, consolidated investments, liquidity and capital resources, current debt and financial strength ratings, and other pertinent information for the Company and its insurance subsidiaries. This discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the condensed consolidated financial statements and notes thereto in Part I, Item 1 contained herein and with the discussion, analysis, and consolidated financial statements and notes thereto in Part I, Item 1 and Part II, Items 6, 7, 7A, and 8 of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003.

2004 Significant Transactions and Events

Restructuring of Individual Income Protection – Closed Block Business

In the first quarter of 2004, the Company restructured its individual income protection – closed block business wherein three of its insurance subsidiaries entered into reinsurance agreements with National Indemnity Company, a subsidiary of Berkshire Hathaway, to reinsure approximately 66.7 percent of potential future losses that occur above a specified retention limit. The individual income protection – closed block reserves in these three subsidiaries comprise approximately 90 percent of the Company’s overall retained risk in the closed block of individual income protection. The reinsurance agreements effectively provide approximately 60 percent reinsurance coverage for the Company’s overall consolidated risk above the retention limit, which equals approximately $8.0 billion in existing statutory reserves. The maximum risk limit for the reinsurer is approximately $783.0 million initially and grows to approximately $2.6 billion over time, after which any further losses will revert to the Company. These reinsurance transactions were effective as of April 1, 2004. The Company transferred cash equal to $521.6 million of reserves ceded in the Individual Income Protection – Closed Block segment plus an additional $185.8 million in cash for a before-tax prepaid cost of insurance which was deferred and will be amortized into earnings over the expected claim payment period covered under the Company’s retention limit. The Company retained the higher yielding investments historically associated with these reserves and redeployed these investments to other lines of business.

In conjunction with the restructuring of the individual income protection – closed block business, effective January 1, 2004, the Company modified its reporting segments to include a separate segment for this business. The reporting, monitoring, and management of the closed block of individual income protection business as a discrete segment is consistent with the Company’s financial restructuring and separation of this business from the lines of business which actively market new products. In the past, this business had been reported in the Income Protection segment. Prior to 2004, detailed separate financial metrics and models were unavailable to appropriately manage this block of business separately from the recently issued individual income protection block of business.

performed for the individual income protection line of business on a combined basis. The testing indicated impairment of the individual income protection – closed block deferred policy acquisition costs, value of business acquired, and goodwill balances of $282.2 million, $367.1 million, and $207.1 million, respectively. These impairment charges, $856.4 million before tax and $629.1 million after tax, are included in the net loss reported for the first six months of 2004.

Also as part of the restructuring, the Company analyzed the reserve assumptions related to its individual income protection – closed block reserves as a stand-alone segment. Previously these reserves were analyzed for the individual income protection line of business on a combined basis. Included in the analysis was a review of morbidity assumptions, primarily claim resolution rates, and claim reserve discount rate assumptions. Based upon this analysis, the Company lowered the claim reserve discount rate to reflect the segmentation of assets between the individual income protection – recently issued business and the individual income protection – closed block business, the change in the Company’s investment portfolio yield rates during the first quarter of 2004, the Company’s expectation of future investment portfolio yield rates, and the Company’s desire to maintain the relationship between the claim reserve discount rate and the investment portfolio yield rate for the individual income protection – closed block at the Company’s long-term objective. The segmentation of the investment portfolio was necessary to ensure appropriate matching of the duration of the assets and the related policy liabilities. Based on this analysis, in the first quarter of 2004 the Company increased its individual income protection – closed block claim reserves by $110.6 million before tax, or $71.9 million after tax, to reflect its current estimate of future benefit obligations. The first quarter 2004 change represented a 1.2 percent increase in total net individual income protection – closed block reserves as of March 31, 2004, which for continuing operations equaled $9.530 billion prior to this increase.

The Company also chose as a part of this restructuring to raise in a non-public offering approximately $300 million of additional capital through the sale of adjustable conversion-rate equity security units to a group of private investors. This transaction closed during the second quarter of 2004. The Company has also filed a shelf registration statement to register the privately placed securities for resale by the private investors. In addition to restoring the Company’s insurance subsidiaries’ risk-based capital to the approximate overall level that existed prior to the reinsurance transaction, the Company will use the proceeds to retain additional liquidity at the holding company level and may also use a portion of the proceeds to reduce its outstanding debt.

Acquisitions and Dispositions

During 2003, the Company entered into an agreement to sell its Canadian branch to RBC Insurance, the insurance operation of Royal Bank of Canada. The transaction closed April 30, 2004, and in the second quarter of 2004, the Company reported a loss of $70.9 million after tax on the sale of the branch. On a statutory basis of reporting, Provident Life and Accident Insurance Company, the Company’s insurance subsidiary which included the Canadian branch business, reported a second quarter of 2004 gain of $250.6 million after tax on the sale of the branch. Additionally, the transaction resulted in an approximate 158 point improvement in the statutory risk-based capital (RBC) ratio of Provident Life and Accident Insurance Company and an approximate 29 point improvement in the Company’s RBC ratio for its U.S. insurance subsidiaries, calculated on a weighted average basis.

Assets transferred to the buyer included available-for-sale fixed maturity securities with a fair value of $1,099.4 million and a book value of $957.7 million. Liabilities transferred included reserves of $1,254.8 million. The Company retained a portion of the Canadian branch fixed maturity bond portfolio according to the terms of the transaction. The bonds retained had a fair value, at April 30, 2004, of $732.9 million and a yield of 7.14 percent. These investments, which will be redeployed to other lines of business during the remainder of the year, added approximately four basis points to the investment portfolio yield rate, at April 30, 2004, in the Company’s continuing operations.

Financial results for the Canadian branch are reported as discontinued operations in the condensed consolidated financial statements. See “Discontinued Operations” contained herein in Item 2 and Note 2 of the “Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements” contained herein in Item 1 for further discussion of the Company’s discontinued operations.

In January 2004, Unum Limited became responsible for the ongoing administration and management of the United Kingdom portion of the group income protection claims portfolio of Swiss Life (UK) plc (Swiss Life), and Swiss Life reinsured this portfolio to Unum Limited. Unum Limited also became a multi-national pooling partner for Swiss Life Insurance & Pension Company with respect to business written in the United Kingdom. In January 2004, the Company sold its Japanese operation, Unum Japan Accident Insurance Co., Ltd., to Hitachi Capital Corporation (Hitachi). The Company also entered into an agreement with Hitachi to reinsure certain existing income protection business and intends to have a continuing presence in these operations for at least one year. The Company expects to complete the restructuring of its Argentinean operation during the second half of 2004, which will reduce its ownership position in this operation to 40 percent. The Company wrote down the book value of both the Japan and Argentinean operations to the estimated fair value less cost to sell during the fourth quarter of 2003.

2003 Significant Transactions and Events

Reserve Strengthening

In April 2003, the Company completed an analysis of its assumptions related to its group long-term income protection claim reserves. Included in the analysis was a review of active claim reserves, incurred but not reported (IBNR) reserves, and claim reopen reserves. An active claim reserve is established for future benefit payments when a claim is incurred and reported to the Company. IBNR reserves are established on claims which are estimated to have been incurred but not yet reported to the Company. Claim reopen reserves are established for those claimants who have previously recovered but who are anticipated to return to disabled status under the same disability and within a specified period of time, as contractually allowed by the disability policy. The analysis was initiated based on lower claim resolution rates observed during the first quarter of 2003. The claim resolution rate is the rate of probability that a disability claimant will recover, die, or reach maximum benefit limits and no longer receive benefit payments from the Company. Generally, claim resolution rates vary by the age of the claimant at the time of disability, duration or length of time since the disability initially occurred, and claim diagnosis. The claim resolution rates for group long-term income protection during the first quarter of 2003 were below levels anticipated for reserves and were lower than those experienced in the full years 2002, 2001, and 2000. The analysis indicated not only a decrease in overall claim resolution rates, but also a change in claim resolution rates by claim duration. The analysis of emerging claim resolution rates and the reasons driving the changes resulted in a reduction in the Company’s long-term expectations with respect to claim resolution rates. The Company’s long-term expectations applied to all claims incurred regardless of the date of incurral. In addition, the Company reviewed the reserve discount rate, which is the interest rate at which future cash flows for benefits and expenses to be paid are discounted to determine the current value of those cash flows. The Company concluded at that time that a change in its discount rate assumptions was not warranted. Based on the April 2003 analysis, in the first quarter of 2003 the Company increased its group long-term income protection claim reserves by $454.0 million before tax, or $295.1 million after tax, to reflect its current estimate of future benefit obligations. The active claim reserve for claims already reported to the Company and still in open claim status was increased by $516.0 million, the IBNR reserve was decreased by $23.0 million, and the reopen reserve was decreased by $39.0 million before tax. The first quarter 2003 change represented a 6.5 percent increase in total net group long-term income protection reserves as of March 31, 2003, which for continuing operations equaled $7.017 billion prior to this increase and equaled $6.618 billion as of December 31, 2002.

Acquisitions

During the first quarter of 2003, Unum Limited acquired the United Kingdom group income protection business of Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada (UK) Ltd (Sun Life) together with the renewal rights to Sun Life’s group life business, at a price of approximately $37.2 million.

Critical Accounting Policies

Reserves for Policy and Contract Benefits

The two primary categories of liabilities for policy and contract benefits are policy reserves for claims not yet incurred and claim reserves for claims that have been incurred and have future benefits to be paid. Policy reserves equal the present value of the difference between future policy benefits and expenses and future premiums, allowing a margin for profit. These reserves are applicable for the majority of the Company’s business, which is traditional non interest-sensitive in nature. The claim payments are estimated using assumptions established when the policy was issued. Throughout the life of the policy, the reserve is based on the original assumptions used for the policy’s issue year. Ordinarily, generally accepted accounting principles require that these assumptions not be subsequently modified unless the policy reserves are determined to be inadequate.

A claim reserve is established when a claim is incurred or is estimated to have been incurred but not yet reported to the Company. Policy reserves for a particular policy continue to be maintained after a claim reserve has been established for as long as the policy remains in force. Claim reserves generally equal the Company’s estimate, at the current reporting period, of the present value of the liability for future benefits and expenses to be paid on claims incurred as of that date. A claim reserve for a specific claim is based on assumptions derived from the Company’s actual historical experience as to claim duration as well as the specific characteristics of the claimant such as benefits available under the policy, the covered benefit period, and the age and occupation of the claimant. Consideration is given to current and historical trends in the Company’s experience and to expected deviations from historical experience that result from changes in benefits available, changes in the Company’s risk management policies and procedures, and other economic, environmental, or societal factors. Reserves for claims that are estimated to have already been incurred but that have not yet been reported to the Company are based on factors such as historical claim reporting patterns, the average cost of claims, and the expected volumes of incurred claims.

Claim reserves, unlike policy reserves, are subject to revision as current claim experience and projections of future factors affecting claim experience change. In a reporting period, actual experience may deviate from the long-term assumptions used to determine the claim reserves. The Company reviews annually, or more frequently as appropriate, emerging experience to ensure that its claim reserves make adequate and reasonable provision for future benefits and expenses. The Company’s reserves for group and individual income protection products include a provision for future payments, other than legal expenses, on all claim-related lawsuits for which the cause of action has already occurred. This includes known lawsuits and those yet to be filed. The reserve amount is the Company’s estimate of the payments on all such lawsuits based on past payments and expected future payments.

Claim reserves on continuing operations, net of ceded reinsurance, were $20.4 billion at December 31, 2003. Claim reserves, in general, are an estimate of the current value of future, otherwise unfunded, benefit commitments or liabilities. The calculation of claim reserves involves numerous assumptions. In setting these assumptions, the Company depends upon industry information and experience, Company experience and analysis, and reasoned judgment. There can be no guarantee that these assumptions individually, or collectively, will be duplicated by actual experience over time. The primary assumptions related to claim reserves are the discount rate, the claim resolution rate, and the incidence rate for IBNR claims.

The discount rate is the interest rate at which future benefit cash flows are discounted to determine the current value of those cash flows. It is important since higher discount rates produce lower reserves. If the discount rate is higher than future investment returns, the Company’s reserves will not earn sufficient investment income to support future liabilities. In this case, the reserves will eventually be insufficient. Alternatively, if a discount rate is chosen that is too low relative to future investment results, the reserve, and thus the claim cost in the current period, will be overstated and profits will be accumulated in the reserves rather than released to current shareholders through earnings. The Company sets its discount rate assumptions in conjunction with the current and expected future investment income rate of the assets supporting the reserves. If the investment yield at which new investments are purchased is below or above the investment yield of the existing investment portfolio, it is likely that the discount rate on new claims will be established below or above the discount rate on existing claims. It is the Company’s intent to use a discount rate that provides some margin for adverse movement in the investment portfolio yield rate. Since policies may receive claim payments for a number of years, it is unlikely that the chosen discount rate

assumption will prove to be accurate for any one policy; rather, the discount rate is chosen to apply to many claims with various characteristics of length and severity. The Company uses its experience and analysis of its existing claims and investment performance to determine the appropriate discount rate assumption. Actual claim reserves incurred in the calendar quarter are sensitive to the choice of discount rate. For example, a 25 basis point increase or decrease in the group long-term income protection claim discount rate would have changed a quarter’s incurred claim cost in 2003 by approximately $5.0 million.

The claim resolution rate is the rate of probability that a disability claim will close or change due to maximum benefits being paid under the policy, the recovery or death of the insured, or a change in status in any given period. It is important because it is used to estimate how long benefits will be paid for a claim. Estimated resolution rates that are set too high will result in reserves that are lower than they need to be to pay the claim benefits over time. A claim closes due to maximum benefits being paid if all of the contractual benefits under the policy have been paid. A claim also closes if the policyholder recovers from his or her disability and is no longer receiving disability benefit payments or if the policyholder dies in the period. A claim may change status during the period. For example, a policyholder receiving disability benefits may return to part time work, and the claim benefit may be reduced to reflect the change to partial disability. Establishing claim resolution assumptions is complex and involves many factors, including the cause of disability, the policyholder’s age, the type of contractual benefits provided, etc. Claim resolution assumptions also vary by duration of disability and time since initially becoming disabled. The Company uses its extensive claim experience and analysis to develop its claim resolution assumptions. Claim resolution experience is studied over a number of years with more weight placed on the more recent experience. Claim resolution assumptions are established to represent the Company’s future resolution rate expectations. Due to the individual nature of each claim, it is unlikely that the claim resolution rate will be accurate for any particular claim. The Company establishes its claim resolution assumptions to apply as an average to its large base of active claims. In this manner, the assumed rates are much more accurate over the broad base of claims. Actual claim reserves incurred in the calendar quarter are sensitive to the choice of resolution rate. For example, a 100 basis point increase or decrease in the group long-term income protection claim resolution rate would have changed a quarter’s incurred claim cost in 2003 by approximately $3.0 million.

The Company has liability for claims that have been incurred but not reported to the Company and must establish a liability for these claims equal to the present value of the expected benefit payments. In addition to the discount rate and claim resolution rate, the incidence rate is also a primary assumption in the IBNR reserve. The incidence rate is the rate at which new claims per thousand insured lives are submitted to the Company. The incidence rate is affected by many factors including the age of the insured, the insured’s occupation or industry, the benefit plan design, and certain external factors such as consumer confidence and levels of unemployment. The Company establishes the incidence assumption using a historical review of actual incidence results along with an outlook of future incidence expectations. As the actual claims are reported and claim reserves are established, the accuracy of the IBNR emerges. While the Company expects its IBNR reserve to be appropriate over the long term, it will not always equal, in a particular reporting period, the actual reserve established for a reported claim. For example, a 10 basis point deviation in the actual incidence rate from that assumed in the IBNR reserve would have resulted in an increase or decrease of approximately $10.0 million in claim reserves established during a quarter in 2003, relative to the IBNR reserve previously established to cover those claims.

Presented as follows are reserves by each major line of business within each segment with discussion regarding material changes.


(in millions of dollars)

	June 30, 2004						December 31, 2003
	IBNR		All Other		Total		IBNR		All Other		Total
Group Income Protection	$	978.8	$	8,574.9	$	9,553.7	$	901.8	$	8,237.1	$	9,138.9
Individual Income Protection - Recently Issued		115.6		979.0		1,094.6		105.5		1,003.8		1,109.3
Long-term Care		28.1		1,414.8		1,442.9		26.8		1,252.8		1,279.6

Income Protection Segment		1,122.5		10,968.7		12,091.2		1,034.1		10,493.7		11,527.8
Life and Accident Segment		342.4		2,160.1		2,502.5		313.3		2,099.3		2,412.6
Colonial Segment		76.8		1,094.2		1,171.0		77.2		1,046.1		1,123.3
Individual Income Protection - Closed Block Segment		360.0		12,074.9		12,434.9		368.3		11,892.2		12,260.5
Other Segment		254.6		8,201.6		8,456.2		256.2		8,272.4		8,528.6

Consolidated from Continuing Operations	$	2,156.3	$	34,499.5	$	36,655.8	$	2,049.1	$	33,803.7	$	35,852.8

Notes:

(1)	IBNR for income protection includes “Reopen Reserves”. These two categories of reserves are developed and maintained in aggregate based on historical monitoring that has only been on a combined basis.

(2)	Total Consolidated equals the sum of “Policy and Contract Benefits”, “Reserves for Future Policy and Contract Benefits and Unearned Premiums”, and “Other Policyholders’ Funds” as reported in the statements of financial condition.

Total consolidated reserves as of June 30, 2004 increased 2.2 percent from December 31, 2003, with IBNR reserves increasing 5.2 percent and all other reserves increasing 2.1 percent. The IBNR increase is directly related to the underlying growth in the business within the Income Protection and Life and Accident segments. The rapid premium growth within the Company’s operations in the United Kingdom contributed to this IBNR growth along with premium growth within the long-term care and individual income protection - recently issued lines of business. The increase in all other reserves is driven by growth within the U.K. operations and the long-term care line of business along with the first quarter of 2004 reserve charge of $110.6 million in the Individual Income Protection - Closed Block segment.

Deferred Policy Acquisition Costs

The Company defers certain costs incurred in acquiring new business and amortizes (expenses) these costs over the life of the related policies. Deferred costs include certain commissions, other agency compensation, selection and policy issue expenses, and field expenses. Acquisition costs that do not vary with the production of new business, such as commissions on group products which are generally level throughout the life of the policy, are excluded from deferral. The Company uses its own historical experience and expectation of the future performance of its business in determining the expected life of the policies. Approximately 95 percent of the Company’s deferred policy acquisition costs relate to traditional non interest-sensitive products, for which the costs are amortized in proportion to the estimated premium income to be received over the life of the policies in accordance with the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 60, Accounting and Reporting by Insurance Enterprises. The estimated premium income in the early years of the amortization period is higher than in the later years due to higher anticipated policy persistency in the early years, which results in a greater proportion of the costs being amortized in the early years of the life of the policy. Amortization of deferred costs on traditional products is adjusted to reflect the actual policy persistency as compared to the anticipated experience. The Company will experience accelerated amortization if policies terminate earlier than projected.

Deferred costs related to group and individual income protection products are amortized over a twenty-year period, with approximately 75 percent and 90 percent of the original deferred costs related to group income protection products expected to be amortized by years ten and fifteen, respectively. For individual income protection policies, approximately 45 percent and 75 percent of the original deferred costs are expected to be amortized by years ten and fifteen, respectively. Deferred costs for group life products are amortized over a fifteen-year period, with approximately 85 percent of the cost expected to be amortized by year ten. Deferred costs for group and individual long-term care products are amortized over a twenty-year period, with approximately 50 percent and 75 percent of the original deferred costs expected to be amortized by years ten and fifteen, respectively. Due to the Company’s actual persistency experienced in recent years relative to what was expected when policies were issued, the Company lowered its premium persistency assumptions for costs deferred in 2002 and thereafter for certain of its products to reflect the Company’s current estimate of persistency. This accelerates the amortization of group income protection and group life acquisition costs deferred in those years into the early life of the policy.

Valuation of Fixed Maturity Securities

In determining when a decline in fair value below amortized cost of a fixed maturity security is other than temporary, the Company evaluates the following factors:

•	The probability of recovering principal and interest.

•	The Company’s ability and intent to retain the security for a sufficient period of time for it to recover.

•	Whether the security is current as to principal and interest payments.

•	The significance of the decline in value.

•	The time period during which there has been a significant decline in value.

•	Current and future business prospects and trends of earnings.

•	Relevant industry conditions and trends relative to their historical cycles.

•	Market conditions.

•	Rating agency actions.

•	Bid and offering prices and the level of trading activity.

•	Any other key measures for the related security.

The Company’s review procedures include, but are not limited to, biweekly meetings of certain members of the Company’s senior management personnel to review reports on the entire portfolio, identifying investments with changes in market value of five percent or more, investments with changes in rating either by external rating agencies or internal analysts, investments segmented by issuer, industry, and foreign exposure levels, and any other relevant investment information to help identify the Company’s exposure to possible credit losses.

Based on this review of the entire investment portfolio, individual investments may be added to or removed from the Company’s “watch list”, which is a list of securities subject to enhanced monitoring and a more intensive review. The Company also determines if its investment portfolio is overexposed to an issuer that is showing warning signs of deterioration and, if so, the Company makes no further purchases of that issuer’s securities and may seek opportunities to sell securities it holds from that issuer to reduce the Company’s exposure. The Company monitors below- investment-grade securities as to individual exposures and in comparison to the entire portfolio as an additional credit risk management strategy, looking specifically at the Company’s exposure to individual securities currently classified as below-investment-grade. In determining current and future business prospects and cash availability, the Company considers the parental support of an issuer in its analysis but does not rely heavily on this support.

If the Company determines that the decline in value of an investment is other than temporary, the investment is written down to fair value, and an impairment loss is recognized in the current period to the extent of the decline in value. If the decline is considered temporary, the security continues to be carefully monitored. These controls have been established to identify the Company’s exposure to possible credit losses and are intended to give the Company the ability to respond rapidly.

The Company has no held-to-maturity fixed maturity securities. All fixed maturity securities are classified as available-for-sale and are reported at fair value. Fair values are based on quoted market prices, where available.

Private placement fixed maturity securities had a fair value of approximately $3.6 billion, or 11.9 percent of total fixed maturity securities at June 30, 2004. Private placement fixed maturity securities do not have readily determinable market prices. For these securities, the Company uses internally prepared valuations combining matrix pricing with vendor purchased software programs, including valuations based on estimates of future profitability, to estimate the fair value. Additionally, the Company obtains prices from independent third-party brokers to establish valuations for certain of these securities. The Company’s ability to liquidate its positions in some of these securities could be impacted to a significant degree by the lack of an actively traded market, and the Company may not be able to dispose of these investments in a timely manner. Although the Company believes its estimates reasonably reflect the fair value of those securities, the key assumptions about the risk-free interest rates, risk premiums, performance of underlying collateral (if any), and other factors involve significant assumptions and may not reflect those of an active market. The Company believes that generally these private placement securities carry a credit quality comparable to companies rated Baa or BBB by major credit rating organizations.

As of June 30, 2004, the key assumptions used to estimate the fair value of private placement fixed maturity securities included the following:

•	Risk free interest rates of 3.77 percent for five-year maturities to 5.29 percent for 30-year maturities were derived from the current yield curve for U.S. Treasury Bonds with similar maturities.

•	Current Baa corporate bond spreads ranging from 0.62 percent to 1.40 percent plus an additional 30 basis points were added to the risk free rate to consider the lack of liquidity.

•	An additional five basis points were added to the risk free rates for foreign investments.

•	Additional basis points were added as deemed appropriate for certain industries and for individual securities in certain industries that are considered to be of greater risk.

Increasing the 30 basis points added to the risk free rate for lack of liquidity by 1.5 basis points, increasing the five basis points added to the risk free rates for foreign investments by one basis point, and increasing the additional basis points added to each industry considered to be of greater risk by one basis point would have decreased the June 30, 2004 net unrealized gain in the fixed maturity securities portfolio by approximately $2.6 million. Historically, the Company’s realized gains or losses on dispositions of its private placement fixed maturity securities have not varied significantly from amounts estimated under the valuation methodology described above.

Changes in the fair value of fixed maturity securities, other than declines that are determined to be other than temporary, are reported as a component of other comprehensive income in stockholders’ equity. If it is subsequently determined that any of these securities are other than temporarily impaired, the impairment loss is reported as a realized investment loss in the consolidated statements of operations. The recognition of the impairment loss does not affect total stockholders’ equity to the extent that the decline in value had been previously reflected in other comprehensive income.

There are a number of significant risks inherent in the process of monitoring the Company’s fixed maturity securities for impairments and determining when and if an impairment is other than temporary. These risks and uncertainties include the following possibilities:

•	The assessment of a borrower’s ability to meet its contractual obligations will change.

•	The economic outlook, either domestic or foreign, may be less favorable or may have a more significant impact on the borrower than anticipated, and as such, the security may not recover in value.

•	New information may become available concerning the security, such as disclosure of accounting irregularities, fraud, or corporate governance issues.

•	Significant changes in credit spreads may occur in the related industry.

•	Adverse rating agency actions may occur.

Reinsurance Receivable

Reinsurance is a contractual agreement whereby the Company’s reinsurance partners assume a defined portion of the risk for future benefits payable under reinsurance contracts. The reinsurance receivable reported as an asset in the Company’s consolidated statements of financial condition includes amounts due from the Company’s reinsurers on current claims and estimates of amounts that will be due on future claims. Policy reserves and claim reserves reported in the Company’s consolidated statements of financial condition are not reduced for reinsurance. The reinsurance receivable is generally equal to the policy reserves and claim reserves related to the risk being reinsured. The Company reduces the reinsurance receivable if recovery is not likely due to the financial position of the reinsurer or if there is disagreement between the Company and the reinsurer regarding the liability of the reinsurer.

Goodwill

Goodwill is the excess of the cost of an acquired entity over the net of the amounts assigned to assets acquired and liabilities assumed. Goodwill is not amortized, but the Company reviews on an annual basis the carrying amount of goodwill for indications of impairment, with consideration given to financial performance and other relevant factors. In accordance with accounting guidance, the Company tests for impairment at either the operating segment level or one level below. In addition, certain events including, but not limited to, a significant adverse change in legal factors or the business environment, an adverse action by a regulator or rating agency, or unanticipated competition would cause the Company to review goodwill for impairment more frequently than annually.

The goodwill reported as an asset in the Company’s condensed consolidated statements of financial condition at June 30, 2004 is attributable primarily to the acquisition of Paul Revere Life Insurance Company (individual income protection – recently issued business) and GENEX Services, Inc. (disability management services business). The impairment testing for goodwill involves estimating the fair value of the individual income protection block of recently issued business and the fair value of the disability management services business based upon the present value of future cash flows using assumptions such as future sales, morbidity experience, portfolio yield rate, and the rate of return at which the Company believes the market would price the businesses for purchase. Adverse changes in any of these factors could result in an impairment of goodwill for either or both of the blocks of business.

Income Taxes

The Company records a valuation allowance to reduce deferred tax assets to the amount that is more likely than not to be realized. The Company’s valuation allowance relates primarily to foreign net operating loss carryforwards. The Company has considered forecasted earnings, future taxable income, and prudent and feasible tax planning strategies in determining the need for a valuation allowance. In the event the Company determines that it might not be able to realize all or part of the net deferred tax assets in the future, an increase to the valuation allowance would be charged to earnings in the period such determination is made. Likewise, if it is later determined that it is more likely than not that the net deferred tax assets would be realized, the previously provided valuation allowance would be reversed.

The amount of income taxes paid by the Company is subject to ongoing audits in various jurisdictions, and a material assessment by a governing tax authority could affect profitability. Management believes that adequate accruals have been provided for all years; however, the amount ultimately paid upon resolution of issues raised could differ materially from the amount accrued.

Consolidated Operating Results


(in millions of dollars)

	Three Months Ended June 30								Six Months Ended June 30
	2004			% Change		2003			2004			% Change		2003
Revenue
Premium Income	$	1,956.8		2.4	%	$	1,911.2		$	3,913.0		3.5	%	$	3,782.5
Net Investment Income		532.9		(0.4	)		535.0			1,067.0		1.2			1,054.3
Net Realized Investment Loss		(86.5	)	N.M.			(26.5	)		(61.1	)	(45.3	)		(111.6	)
Other Income		106.1		(3.1	)		109.5			214.1		7.7			198.8

Total		2,509.3		(0.8	)		2,529.2			5,133.0		4.2			4,924.0

Benefits and Expenses
Benefits and Change in Reserves for Future Benefits		1,756.8		(0.5	)		1,765.8			3,636.1		(7.0	)		3,909.2
Commissions		212.4		(0.8	)		214.1			433.7		(0.4	)		435.3
Interest and Debt Expense		51.5		12.2			45.9			100.7		15.2			87.4
Deferral of Policy Acquisition Costs		(146.1	)	(15.5	)		(173.0	)		(294.4	)	(14.8	)		(345.7	)
Amortization of Deferred Policy Acquisition Costs		109.6		(5.7	)		116.2			218.2		(5.2	)		230.2
Amortization of Value of Business Acquired		5.2		(51.4	)		10.7			9.1		(55.6	)		20.5
Impairment of Intangible Assets		—		—			—			856.4		N.M.			—
Compensation Expense		185.1		(3.8	)		192.4			372.8		(2.7	)		383.0
Other Operating Expenses		222.7		1.4			219.7			458.5		0.5			456.2

Total		2,397.2		0.2			2,391.8			5,791.1		11.9			5,176.1

Income (Loss) from Continuing Operations Before Income Tax		112.1		(18.4	)		137.4			(658.1	)	N.M.			(252.1	)
Income Tax (Benefit)		37.1		(14.3	)		43.3			(163.8	)	68.5			(97.2	)

Income (Loss) from Continuing Operations		75.0		(20.3	)		94.1			(494.3	)	N.M.			(154.9	)

Income (Loss) from Discontinued Operations, Net of Income Tax		(67.8	)	N.M.			4.4			(60.8	)	N.M.			7.0

Net Income (Loss)	$	7.2		(92.7	)	$	98.5		$	(555.1	)	N.M.		$	(147.9	)

N.M. = not a meaningful percentage

Consolidated Sales Results


(in millions of dollars)

	Three Months Ended June 30						Six Months Ended June 30
	2004		% Change		2003		2004		% Change		2003
Income Protection Segment

Fully Insured Products
Group Long-term Income Protection	$	73.3	(32.1	)%	$	107.9	$	138.4	(20.3	)%	$	173.6
Group Short-term Income Protection		16.9	(35.2	)		26.1		42.6	(19.5	)		52.9
Individual Income Protection - Recently Issued		22.9	(17.0	)		27.6		52.3	(14.5	)		61.2
Group Long-term Care		4.5	(22.4	)		5.8		7.8	(23.5	)		10.2
Individual Long-term Care		6.0	(50.0	)		12.0		11.4	(56.7	)		26.3

Total Fully Insured Products		123.6	(31.1	)		179.4		252.5	(22.1	)		324.2

Administrative Services Only (ASO) Products
Group Long-term Income Protection		0.1	(92.3	)		1.3		0.3	(80.0	)		1.5
Group Short-term Income Protection		0.9	(59.1	)		2.2		2.5	(50.0	)		5.0

Total ASO Products		1.0	(71.4	)		3.5		2.8	(56.9	)		6.5

Income Protection Segment		124.6	(31.9	)		182.9		255.3	(22.8	)		330.7

Life and Accident Segment
Group Life		67.8	(9.5	)		74.9		107.4	(16.7	)		128.9
Accidental Death & Dismemberment		3.6	(32.1	)		5.3		6.1	(48.7	)		11.9
Brokerage Voluntary Life and Other		13.5	(5.6	)		14.3		49.1	(0.2	)		49.2

Life and Accident Segment		84.9	(10.2	)		94.5		162.6	(14.4	)		190.0

Colonial Segment		63.2	(3.7	)		65.6		124.9	(0.2	)		125.2

Individual Income Protection - Closed Block Segment		1.9	(42.4	)		3.3		3.9	(36.1	)		6.1

Total Sales from Continuing Operations		274.6	(20.7	)		346.3		546.7	(16.2	)		652.0

Discontinued Operations		2.6	(73.7	)		9.9		10.1	(42.6	)		17.6

Total	$	277.2	(22.2	)	$	356.2	$	556.8	(16.8	)	$	669.6

Sales results shown in the preceding chart generally represent the annualized premium or annualized fee income on new sales expected to be received and reported as premium income or fee income during the next twelve months following or commencing in the initial quarter in which the sale is reported, depending on the effective date of the new sale. Sales do not correspond to premium income or fee income reported as revenue under GAAP because new annualized premiums measure current sales performance, while premium income and fee income reflect renewals and persistency of in force policies written in prior years as well as current new sales.

Premiums for fully insured products are reported as premium income while the fees for administrative services only (ASO) products, wherein the risk and responsibility for funding claim payments remains with the customer, are included in other income. Sales, together with persistency of the existing block of business and the Company’s renewal program, are an indicator of growth in the Company’s premium and fee income. Trends in new sales, as well as existing market share, are also indicators of the Company’s potential for growth in its respective markets and the level of market acceptance of price changes and new product offerings. Sales may fluctuate significantly due to case size and timing of sales submissions. Negative media attention or downgrades in the financial strength ratings of the Company’s insurance subsidiaries may adversely affect the Company’s ability to grow sales and renew its existing business. The Company does not expect sales growth in 2004 for its group income protection and its group life and accidental death and dismemberment lines of business, particularly in the large-employer market, as the

Company continues with the strategy it implemented in 2003 to shift its business mix so as to increase its share of its mid- and small-employer markets. The Company intends to take a disciplined approach to pricing, renewals, and risk selection, with a focused effort on balancing growth and profitability. While managing its business mix in this disciplined manner, the Company expects to continue to be a leading provider in the large-employer market segment.

The Company has field sales personnel who specialize in (1) employer-provided plans for employees and (2) supplemental benefit plans that include multi-life income protection and long-term care product offerings and products sold to groups of employees through payroll deduction at the workplace. These field sales personnel partner with Company representatives from claims, customer service, and underwriting who work in conjunction with independent brokers and consultants to present coverage solutions to potential customers and to manage existing customer accounts. The Company utilizes a distribution model for the sale of individual income protection and individual long-term care insurance products whereby independent brokers and consultants are provided direct access to a sales support center centrally located in the Company’s corporate offices. The Company intends to maintain its focus on workplace customers and increased integration between individual multi-life and group offerings by continuing to provide highly focused field support. The Company also utilizes an agency field sales force to market the products offered by its Colonial segment.

Segment Operating Results

The Company’s reporting segments include the following six business segments: Income Protection, Life and Accident, Colonial, Individual Income Protection – Closed Block, Other, and Corporate. The segments remain unchanged from the prior year reporting other than the separation of the Individual Income Protection – Closed Block from the Income Protection segment. Prior year numbers have been reclassified to conform to the current segment reporting.

In the following segment financial data and discussions of segment operating results, “operating revenue” excludes net realized investment gains and losses. “Operating income” or “operating loss” excludes net realized investment gains and losses, income tax, and results of discontinued operations. These are considered non-GAAP financial measures. A non-GAAP financial measure is a numerical measure of a company’s performance, financial position, or cash flows that excludes or includes amounts that are not normally excluded or included in the most directly comparable measure calculated and presented in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (GAAP).

These non-GAAP financial measures of “operating revenue” and “operating income” or “operating loss” differ from revenue and income (loss) from continuing operations before income tax as presented in the Company’s consolidated operating results reported herein and in income statements prepared in accordance with GAAP due to the exclusion of before tax realized investment gains and losses. The Company measures segment performance for purposes of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 131, Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information, excluding realized investment gains and losses because management believes that this performance measure is a better indicator of the ongoing businesses and the underlying trends in the businesses. The Company’s investment focus is on investment income to support its insurance liabilities as opposed to the generation of realized investment gains and losses, and a long-term focus is necessary to maintain profitability over the life of the business. Realized investment gains and losses are dependent on market conditions and not necessarily related to decisions regarding the underlying business of the Company’s segments. However, income or loss excluding realized investment gains and losses does not replace net income or net loss as a measure of the Company’s overall profitability. The Company may experience realized investment losses, which will affect future earnings levels as the underlying business is long-term in nature and requires that the Company be able to earn the assumed interest rates in its liabilities.

A reconciliation of total operating revenue by segment to total consolidated revenue and total operating income (loss) by segment to consolidated net income (loss) is as follows.


(in millions of dollars)

	Three Months Ended June 30						Six Months Ended June 30
	2004			2003			2004			2003
Operating Revenue by Segment	$	2,595.8		$	2,555.7		$	5,194.1		$	5,035.6
Net Realized Investment Loss		(86.5	)		(26.5	)		(61.1	)		(111.6	)

Revenue	$	2,509.3		$	2,529.2		$	5,133.0		$	4,924.0

Operating Income (Loss) by Segment	$	198.6		$	163.9		$	(597.0	)	$	(140.5	)
Net Realized Investment Loss		(86.5	)		(26.5	)		(61.1	)		(111.6	)
Income Tax (Benefit)		37.1			43.3			(163.8	)		(97.2	)
Income (Loss) from Discontinued Operations, Net of Income Tax		(67.8	)		4.4			(60.8	)		7.0

Net Income (Loss)	$	7.2		$	98.5		$	(555.1	)	$	(147.9	)

Income Protection Segment Operating Results

The Income Protection segment includes the group long-term and short-term income protection insurance, recently issued individual income protection insurance, group and individual long-term care, and managed disability. Shown below are financial results for the income protection segment. In the sections following, financial results and key ratios are also presented for the major lines of business within the segment.


(in millions of dollars)

	Three Months Ended June 30								Six Months Ended June 30
	2004			% Change		2003			2004			% Change		2003
Operating Revenue
Premium Income	$	1,024.5		3.9	%	$	986.0		$	2,049.6		5.8	%	$	1,937.6
Net Investment Income		227.1		1.6			223.6			444.3		2.4			433.8
Other Income		61.7		5.7			58.4			126.1		10.4			114.2

Total		1,313.3		3.6			1,268.0			2,620.0		5.4			2,485.6

Benefits and Expenses
Benefits and Change in Reserves for Future Benefits		871.8		2.3			851.9			1,740.5		(18.1	)		2,124.0
Commissions		103.5		2.6			100.9			211.3		1.8			207.5
Deferral of Policy Acquisition Costs		(67.1	)	(20.9	)		(84.8	)		(136.4	)	(22.7	)		(176.4	)
Amortization of Deferred Policy Acquisition Costs		49.8		2.7			48.5			97.7		1.7			96.1
Amortization of Value of Business Acquired		4.3		N.M.			1.0			7.3		N.M.			1.7
Operating Expenses		260.2		3.3			252.0			534.5		4.9			509.7

Total		1,222.5		4.5			1,169.5			2,454.9		(11.1	)		2,762.6

Operating Income (Loss) Before Income Tax and Net Realized Investment Gains and Losses	$	90.8		(7.8	)	$	98.5		$	165.1		N.M.		$	(277.0	)

N.M. = not a meaningful percentage

Segment Sales

Group long-term income protection sales on a fully insured basis decreased during the second quarter and six months of 2004 compared to the same periods of 2003 due to declines in the Company’s U.S. brokerage business. The Company’s U.S. brokerage sales of group long-term income protection products declined 53.2 percent and 44.0 percent for the three and six months ended June 30, 2004 relative to the comparable periods of 2003 due primarily to a decline in sales in the large-employer market as the Company continued to shift its focus to the small- and mid-employer market to restore a more balanced mix of business between small, medium, and large employer customers. The decrease in the U.S. sales was partially offset by growth of 73.9 percent and 82.3 percent in the Company’s United Kingdom operations for the second quarter and first six months of 2004 compared to the same periods last year. Group short-term income protection sales on a fully insured basis also decreased in the second quarter and first six months of 2004 compared to the prior year due to the Company’s shift in its business strategy.

Sales for individual income protection – recently issued declined primarily due to a decrease in sales in the Company’s United Kingdom operations. The portion of the individual income protection sales attributable to multi-life business in the Company’s U.S. operations was approximately 79 percent for the first six months of 2004 and 77 percent for full year 2003 sales.

During 2003, the Company introduced a new distribution model for the sale of individual income protection and individual long-term care insurance products which will enable the Company to maintain its focus on workplace customers and increased integration between individual multi-life and group offerings. The Company also introduced changes in the individual long-term care product offering during 2003. These actions may slow the growth in sales of non multi-life individual income protection and individual long-term care insurance relative to historical trends.

The Company expects relatively weaker sales comparisons for both group and individual income protection products, primarily as a result of the competitive pricing environment but also due to the adverse publicity surrounding the Company. The Company intends to continue to emphasize profitable premium growth through a balance of new sales, renewal programs, and persistency of the existing block of business, but the Company is prepared to shrink its business in order to maintain appropriate profit margins.

Segment Persistency and Renewal of Existing Business

The Company monitors persistency of its existing business and reflects adverse changes in persistency in the current period’s amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs. One way in which the Company monitors persistency is at the overall block of business level (i.e., group long-term income protection, group short-term income protection, and group life). Persistency, at the overall block of business level, is the year-to-date rate at which existing business for all issue years in the block of business at the beginning of the period remains inforce at the end of the period. In determining whether additional amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs is required due to adverse persistency, the Company measures persistency by issue year (i.e., the rate at which existing business for that specific issue year at the beginning of the period remains inforce at the end of the period). The rate of persistency for an overall block of business may improve while individual issue years within the overall block of business may deteriorate and require additional amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs.

Persistency during the first six months of 2004 for the overall block of group long-term income protection on average declined from that experienced in full year 2003. Persistency for fully insured short-term income protection also declined, on average, over the prior year. These declines in persistency were expected due to the Company’s more disciplined approach to pricing, renewals, and risk selection. Approximately 35 percent of the Company’s group business has an effective renewal date of January 1. Because of competitive pricing and the adverse publicity surrounding the Company, the Company believes there may be a greater risk for a decline in persistency for the business to be renewed effective January 1, 2005 than would have otherwise existed. For the years 2002 and subsequent, the Company lowered its premium persistency assumptions for group income protection policy acquisition costs deferred in those years to reflect its current estimate of persistency. This accelerated the amortization of group long-term and short-term income protection acquisition costs deferred in those years into the early life of the policy by using lower premium persistency assumptions to determine the “scheduled” or expected amortization. Although persistency in the future may

be lower than historical levels, particularly in certain issue years due to the Company’s increased emphasis on retaining profitable business, the acceleration of “scheduled” amortization may eliminate the need for additional amortization related to the decline in actual persistency relative to “scheduled” or expected persistency. The persistency of individual income protection and long-term care continues to be within expected levels.

A critical part of the Company’s strategy for group income protection involves executing its renewal program and managing persistency in its existing block of business, both of which management expects will have a positive effect on future profitability. The Company is shifting emphasis from revenue growth to profit margin expansion, raising prices and remaining more disciplined in risk selection, and restoring a more balanced mix of business between small, medium, and large employer customers, since large employer customers are often more price sensitive and vulnerable to weak economic conditions. The Company’s renewal programs have generally been successful in retaining group income protection business that is relatively more profitable than business that terminated.

While it is expected that the additional premium and related profits associated with renewal activity will continue to emerge, the Company intends to maintain a disciplined approach in the re-pricing of renewal business, while balancing the need to maximize persistency and retain producer relationships.

Group Income Protection Operating Results

Shown below are financial results and key performance indicators for group income protection.


(in millions of dollars, except ratios)

	Three Months Ended June 30								Six Months Ended June 30
	2004			% Change		2003			2004			% Change		2003
Operating Revenue
Premium Income
Group Long-term Income Protection	$	630.5		4.5	%	$	603.2		$	1,260.3		6.8	%	$	1,180.3
Group Short-term Income Protection		155.9		(1.9	)		159.0			313.0		(0.2	)		313.5

Total Premium Income		786.4		3.2			762.2			1,573.3		5.3			1,493.8
Net Investment Income		181.2		3.7			174.8			352.4		2.3			344.4
Other Income		17.8		38.0			12.9			34.7		42.2			24.4

Total		985.4		3.7			949.9			1,960.4		5.3			1,862.6

Benefits and Expenses
Benefits and Change in Reserves for Future Benefits		702.9		1.6			691.5			1,406.0		(22.5	)		1,814.2
Commissions		59.5		1.2			58.8			119.5		0.3			119.1
Deferral of Policy Acquisition Costs		(24.5	)	(34.5	)		(37.4	)		(49.4	)	(35.3	)		(76.3	)
Amortization of Deferred Policy Acquisition Costs		26.3		3.5			25.4			51.8		0.8			51.4
Amortization of Value of Business Acquired		4.2		N.M.			0.9			7.2		N.M.			1.6
Operating Expenses		167.6		2.8			163.0			345.6		5.3			328.3

Total		936.0		3.7			902.2			1,880.7		(16.0	)		2,238.3

Operating Income (Loss) Before Income Tax and Net Realized Investment Gains and Losses	$	49.4		3.6		$	47.7		$	79.7		121.2		$	(375.7	)

Benefit Ratio (% of Premium Income) (1)		89.4	%				90.7	%		89.4	%				121.4	%
Operating Expense Ratio (% of Premium Income)		21.3	%				21.4	%		22.0	%				22.0	%
Operating Expense Ratio (% of Premium + Fee Income)		20.9	%				21.0	%		21.5	%				21.6	%
Before-tax Operating Income (Loss) Ratio (% of Premium Income) (1)		6.3	%				6.3	%		5.1	%				(25.2	)%
Persistency - U.S. Group Long-term Income Protection										84.9	%				87.4	%
Persistency - U.S. Group Short-term Income Protection										82.5	%				85.3	%

(1)	Included in these ratios is the first quarter 2003 before-tax reserve strengthening of $454.0 million. Excluding this charge, the benefit ratio and before-tax operating income ratio for the six months of 2003 would have been 91.1% and 5.2%, respectively.

N.M. = not a meaningful percentage

Quarter Ended June 30, 2004 Compared with Quarter Ended June 30, 2003

Operating revenue for group income protection improved primarily due to increases in premium income. Premium income for the U.S. brokerage business was fairly flat period to period. The growth in premium income occurred in the Company’s United Kingdom group long-term income protection business and was primarily attributable to the 2003 acquisition of the United Kingdom group income protection business of Sun Life, as previously discussed. Premium income in the United Kingdom group long-term income protection business increased 31.2 percent, or $29.4 million, in the second quarter of 2004 and $70.6 million in the first six months of 2004 relative to the same

periods of 2003. A portion of that reported growth also resulted from the favorable foreign currency exchange rate in 2004 relative to 2003. When measured in its local currency, the second quarter growth rate in premium income in the United Kingdom’s group long-term income protection line was approximately 17.5 percent year over year, and the six months growth rate was approximately 24.6 percent. Net investment income increased in 2004 compared with the second quarter and first six months of 2003 due to the growth in invested assets supporting this line of business, somewhat offset by lower investment portfolio yields. Included in other income are ASO fees of $14.3 million and $28.1 million for the second quarter and first six months of 2004, respectively, and $11.5 million and $21.7 million for the prior year comparable periods.

Contributing to the decrease in the second quarter 2004 benefit ratio relative to the prior year comparable period was a higher claim resolution rate for group long-term income protection. This reduced benefits and change in reserves approximately $10.0 million relative to the prior year second quarter. For the six month periods, the 2004 claim resolution rate was higher than 2003, while the submitted claim incidence in 2004 was relatively stable with the incidence rate experienced in the first six months of 2003. The impact on benefits and change in reserves was a decrease of approximately $20.0 million for the higher claim resolution rate. The Company believes the incidence levels are driven in part by economic trends, including consumer confidence. For group short-term income protection, paid claim incidence decreased for the second quarter and six months of 2004 compared to the prior year periods, which decreased second quarter and first six months of 2004 benefits and change in reserves approximately $2.5 million and $1.0 million, respectively, compared to the second quarter and first six months of 2003.

Costs capitalized during 2004 for group income protection were lower than in the prior year second quarter and first six months due to an updated analysis of costs associated with the acquisition of new business and due to the decrease in sales. The amortization of value of business acquired increased during 2004 due to the previously discussed United Kingdom transaction with Swiss Life.

As previously discussed, during the first quarter of 2003, the Company strengthened its group income protection claim reserves $454.0 million. Excluding this charge, group income protection would have reported operating income of $78.3 million for the first six months of 2003.

As discussed under “Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements,” certain risks and uncertainties are inherent in the Company’s group income protection business. Components of claims experience, including, but not limited to, incidence levels and claims duration, may be worse than expected. The Company, similar to all financial institutions, has some exposure in a severe and prolonged economic recession, but many of the Company’s products can be re-priced, which would allow the Company to reflect in its pricing any fundamental change which might occur in the risk associated with a particular industry or company within an industry. Although approximately 30 percent of the Company’s overall block of group income protection business is in the manufacturing and wholesale/retail industry segments, which tend to be economically sensitive, the Company believes it has a well-diversified book of insurance exposure, with no disproportionate concentrations of risk in any one industry.

The Company expects to price new business and re-price existing business, at contract renewal dates, in an attempt to mitigate the effect of incidence levels, claims duration, and other factors, including interest rates, on new claim liabilities. Given the competitive market conditions for the Company’s income protection products, it is uncertain whether pricing actions can entirely mitigate the effect.

Individual Income Protection - Recently Issued Operating Results

Shown below are financial results and key performance indicators for individual income protection – recently issued.


(in millions of dollars, except ratios)

	Three Months Ended June 30								Six Months Ended June 30
	2004			% Change		2003			2004			% Change		2003
Operating Revenue
Premium Income	$	128.9		3.7	%	$	124.3		$	258.7		3.8	%	$	249.2
Net Investment Income		21.1		(28.7	)		29.6			43.7		(18.2	)		53.4
Other Income		0.3		(85.7	)		2.1			2.2		(46.3	)		4.1

Total		150.3		(3.7	)		156.0			304.6		(0.7	)		306.7

Benefits and Expenses
Benefits and Change in Reserves for Future Benefits		73.9		(4.3	)		77.2			144.4		(1.8	)		147.1
Commissions		28.2		13.3			24.9			59.0		13.5			52.0
Deferral of Policy Acquisition Costs		(33.1	)	4.4			(31.7	)		(66.6	)	(0.4	)		(66.9	)
Amortization of Deferred Policy Acquisition Costs		17.9		4.7			17.1			34.7		7.1			32.4
Amortization of Value of Business Acquired		0.1		—			0.1			0.1		—			0.1
Operating Expenses		38.7		17.3			33.0			79.1		15.6			68.4

Total		125.7		4.2			120.6			250.7		7.6			233.1

Operating Income Before Income Tax and Net Realized Investment Gains and Losses	$	24.6		(30.5	)	$	35.4		$	53.9		(26.8	)	$	73.6

Benefit Ratio (% of Premium Income)		57.3	%				62.1	%		55.8	%				59.0	%
Interest Adjusted Loss Ratio		45.4	%				50.2	%		44.0	%				47.1	%
Operating Expense Ratio (% of Premium Income)		30.0	%				26.5	%		30.6	%				27.4	%
Before-tax Operating Income Ratio (% of Premium Income)		19.1	%				28.5	%		20.8	%				29.5	%
Persistency										89.9	%				89.7	%

The decline in net investment income in 2004 relative to the prior year resulted from a decline in the yield on the portfolio as well as the redistribution internally of invested assets. Part of this internal redistribution resulted in the exchange of fixed maturity securities for a corporate owned life insurance policy with an expected duration that provides an appropriate matching of the duration of the assets and the related policy liabilities for this line of business. The reported income on the corporate owned life insurance policy is included in other income rather than net investment income. This resulting increase in other income was more than offset by a decline in administration fees due to the termination of certain third party arrangements.

Decreases in the benefit ratio were primarily due to lower submitted claim incidence in the second quarter and first six months of 2004 relative to the prior year, which decreased second quarter and first six months of 2004 benefits and change in reserves approximately $15.0 million and $20.0 million, respectively, compared to the second quarter and first six months of 2003. Multi-life business, which constitutes approximately 58 percent of the individual income protection – recently issued block of business, has consistently had lower claim incidence rates than the non multi-life business. The net claim resolution rate decreased in the second quarter and first six months of 2004 relative to the prior year, which increased benefits and change in reserves approximately $9.0 million and $12.0 million compared to the second quarter and first six months of 2003, respectively.

Long-term Care Operating Results

Shown below are financial results and key performance indicators for long-term care.


(in millions of dollars, except ratios)
	Three Months Ended June 30								Six Months Ended June 30
	2004			% Change		2003			2004			% Change		2003
Operating Revenue
Premium Income
Group Long-term Care	$	34.5		14.2	%	$	30.2		$	69.4		16.8	%	$	59.4
Individual Long-term Care		74.7		7.8			69.3			148.2		9.6			135.2

Total Premium Income		109.2		9.7			99.5			217.6		11.8			194.6
Net Investment Income		24.8		29.2			19.2			48.2		33.9			36.0
Other Income		0.2		N.M.			(0.2	)		0.3		N.M.			(0.3	)

Total		134.2		13.2			118.5			266.1		15.5			230.3

Benefits and Expenses
Benefits and Change in Reserves for Future Benefits		95.0		14.2			83.2			190.1		16.8			162.7
Commissions		15.8		(8.1	)		17.2			32.8		(9.9	)		36.4
Deferral of Policy Acquisition Costs		(9.5	)	(39.5	)		(15.7	)		(20.4	)	(38.6	)		(33.2	)
Amortization of Deferred Policy Acquisition Costs		5.6		(6.7	)		6.0			11.2		(8.9	)		12.3
Operating Expenses		14.6		(15.1	)		17.2			28.7		(19.6	)		35.7

Total		121.5		12.6			107.9			242.4		13.3			213.9

Operating Income Before Income Tax and Net Realized Investment Gains and Losses	$	12.7		19.8		$	10.6		$	23.7		44.5		$	16.4

Benefit Ratio (% of Premium Income)		87.0	%				83.6	%		87.4	%				83.6	%
Operating Expense Ratio (% of Premium Income)		13.4	%				17.3	%		13.2	%				18.3	%
Before-tax Operating Income Ratio (% of Premium Income)		11.6	%				10.7	%		10.9	%				8.4	%

Persistency - U.S. Group Long-term Care										92.3	%				91.6	%
Persistency - U.S. Individual Long-term Care										96.5	%				96.2	%

Premium income increased compared to the second quarter and first six months of 2003 primarily due to new sales growth in previous periods. New annualized sales for long-term care were $10.5 million and $17.8 million for the second quarters of 2004 and 2003, respectively, and $70.9 million for full year 2003. Changes in the product offering during 2003 have decreased the growth in individual long-term care sales relative to historical trends. This is expected to continue and will result in a slower rate of growth in premium income. Net investment income increased due to the growth in invested assets supporting this line of business. Persistency in this line of business remains high and stable.

Submitted new claims for long-term care were higher in the second quarter and first six months of 2004 than in the comparable periods of 2003, resulting in second quarter and first six months of 2004 increases in benefits and change in reserves of approximately $6.0 million and $10.0 million, respectively. The net claim resolution rate for long-term care was stable compared to the second quarter and first six months of 2003. Results for long-term care continue to be volatile due to the relatively small size of this block of business.

Acquisition costs capitalized during 2004 were lower than in the prior year second quarter and first six months due to the reduction in sales. Operating expenses in 2004 also declined relative to the prior year due to lower selling expenses.

Disability Management Services Operating Results

Operating revenue from disability management services, which includes the Company’s wholly-owned subsidiaries GENEX Services, Inc. and Options and Choices, Inc., totaled $43.4 million and $88.9 million in the second quarter and first six months of 2004, respectively, compared to $43.6 million and $86.0 million in the comparable periods of 2003. Operating income totaled $4.1 million in the second quarter of 2004 compared to $4.8 million in the second quarter of 2003 and $7.8 million and $8.7 million for the first six months of 2004 and 2003, respectively.

Segment Outlook

The Company’s primary focus for the remainder of 2004 for Income Protection will continue to be profitability enhancement, with an emphasis on the core markets and a balanced mix of business. The Company expects relatively weaker sales comparisons for both group and individual income protection products, primarily as a result of the competitive pricing environment but also due to the adverse publicity surrounding the Company. The Company does not expect sales growth in the large-employer market as the Company continues with the strategy it implemented in 2003 to shift business mix from the large-employer market to the mid- and small-employer markets. The Company does, however, expect to continue to generate sales in the large-employer market, although below the growth levels experienced in the past, and to be a leading provider in this market segment.

The Company intends to continue its disciplined approach to pricing, renewals, and risk selection, with a more conscious effort to balance growth and profitability. Although this strategy may cause a somewhat lower persistency or market share, historically the profitability of business that terminates has generally been less than the profitability of retained business. The Company also expects that its income protection product results will benefit if there is an improvement in overall economic conditions and a higher interest rate environment, although the improvement in results may lag behind the improvements in the economy and interest rate environment.

Life and Accident Segment Operating Results

Shown below are financial results and key performance indicators for the life and accident segment.


(in millions of dollars, except ratios)

	Three Months Ended June 30								Six Months Ended June 30
	2004			% Change		2003			2004			% Change		2003
Operating Revenue
Premium Income
Group Life	$	394.9		3.0	%	$	383.3		$	783.7		3.9	%	$	754.4
Accidental Death & Dismemberment		45.5		(12.3	)		51.9			92.6		(9.7	)		102.5
Brokerage Voluntary Life and Other		55.8		10.9			50.3			110.0		11.0			99.1

Total Premium Income		496.2		2.2			485.5			986.3		3.2			956.0
Net Investment Income		45.5		(3.4	)		47.1			90.4		(3.9	)		94.1
Other Income		4.2		13.5			3.7			8.7		27.9			6.8

Total		545.9		1.8			536.3			1,085.4		2.7			1,056.9

Benefits and Expenses
Benefits and Change in Reserves for Future Benefits		383.0		1.6			377.1			758.0		2.8			737.6
Commissions		44.1		(2.2	)		45.1			89.6		(0.7	)		90.2
Deferral of Policy Acquisition Costs		(34.4	)	(20.6	)		(43.3	)		(68.6	)	(14.7	)		(80.4	)
Amortization of Deferred Policy Acquisition Costs		27.2		(0.4	)		27.3			55.3		3.2			53.6
Amortization of Value of Business Acquired		0.6		20.0			0.5			1.2		50.0			0.8
Operating Expenses		66.8		0.5			66.5			134.4		4.0			129.2

Total		487.3		3.0			473.2			969.9		4.2			931.0

Operating Income Before Income Tax and Net Realized Investment Gains and Losses	$	58.6		(7.1	)	$	63.1		$	115.5		(8.3	)	$	125.9

Benefit Ratio (% of Premium Income)		77.2	%				77.7	%		76.9	%				77.2	%
Operating Expense Ratio (% of Premium Income)		13.5	%				13.7	%		13.6	%				13.5	%
Before-tax Operating Income Ratio (% of Premium Income)		11.8	%				13.0	%		11.7	%				13.2	%

Persistency - U.S. Group Life										84.1	%				83.6	%
Persistency - U.S. Accidental Death & Dismemberment										80.8	%				86.0	%
Persistency - Brokerage Voluntary Life										83.6	%				83.9	%
Persistency - Brokerage Voluntary Other										75.5	%				77.4	%

The Life and Accident segment includes insurance for life, accidental death and dismemberment, cancer, and critical illness marketed primarily to employers and multi-life employee groups by the Company’s sales force through independent brokers and consultants.

Segment Sales

Sales for group life decreased in the second quarter and first six months of 2004 relative to the same periods in the prior year due to a 43.6 percent decrease in sales in the Company’s U.S. operations, partially offset by an increase in sales in the United Kingdom operations. The decline in U.S. group life sales is primarily attributable to a more competitive market and also due to lower large case sales resulting from the previously discussed business mix shift. The increase in the United Kingdom sales is partially due to the inclusion of additional sales generated as a result of the 2003 Sun Life acquisition. Sales for accidental death and dismemberment declined relative to sales in the second quarter and first six months of 2003 because of the impact of the Company’s stand-alone large-employer life strategy on the sales of the accidental death and dismemberment rider. Brokerage voluntary life and other sales

decreased slightly in the second quarter of 2004 relative to last year, but were level with 2003 for the first six months.

Operating Results

Premium growth in 2004 relative to 2003 was attributable primarily to strong group life sales results in the United Kingdom operations.

Submitted and paid claim incidence for group life were both higher in the second quarter and first six months of 2004 relative to the same periods of 2003. The average paid claim size for group life increased from the second quarter and first six months of 2003. Notwithstanding the higher incidence and average size of claim, the benefit ratios in the second quarter and first six months of 2004 decreased compared to the second quarter and first six months of 2003 due to the growth in premium income.

Acquisition costs capitalized during 2004 for the life and accident segment were lower than in the prior year second quarter and first six months due primarily to an updated analysis of costs associated with the acquisition of new business and due to the decrease in sales.

Segment Outlook

The Company considers the group life and accidental death and dismemberment products as being complementary to its group income protection products. Sales of group life and accidental death and dismemberment products are expected to be below 2003 levels and, like group income protection, will be primarily focused on a more balanced mix of sales between large, medium, and small employer markets. The Company intends to continue its disciplined approach to risk selection and pricing and focus on profitability. Since the group life and accidental death and dismemberment products are primarily sold in conjunction with group income protection, the more focused renewal effort in group income protection may reduce persistency somewhat in the group life line as well. The benefit ratio is expected to remain relatively flat with that in the prior year.

The Company will continue to concentrate on sales growth and increased profitability for its voluntary brokerage and other lines.

Colonial Segment Operating Results

Shown below are financial results and key performance indicators for the Colonial segment.

(in millions of dollars, except ratios)


	Three Months Ended June 30								Six Months Ended June 30
	2004			% Change		2003			2004			% Change		2003
Operating Revenue
Premium Income
Income Protection	$	120.7		4.5	%	$	115.5		$	239.7		4.0	%	$	230.4
Life		26.7		14.6			23.3			53.3		12.9			47.2
Other		36.6		11.2			32.9			72.1		11.4			64.7

Total Premium Income		184.0		7.2			171.7			365.1		6.7			342.3
Net Investment Income		23.7		12.3			21.1			46.5		11.0			41.9
Other Income		0.7		(46.2	)		1.3			1.0		(41.2	)		1.7

Total		208.4		7.4			194.1			412.6		6.9			385.9

Benefits and Expenses
Benefits and Change in Reserves for Future Benefits		101.6		4.1			97.6			202.1		4.3			193.7
Commissions		44.6		8.3			41.2			88.9		8.9			81.6
Deferral of Policy Acquisition Costs		(44.5	)	4.5			(42.6	)		(89.3	)	5.9			(84.3	)
Amortization of Deferred Policy Acquisition Costs		32.5		8.3			30.0			65.1		9.2			59.6
Amortization of Value of Business Acquired		0.3		—			0.3			0.6		(14.3	)		0.7
Operating Expenses		34.5		7.1			32.2			69.2		8.1			64.0

Total		169.0		6.5			158.7			336.6		6.8			315.3

Operating Income Before Income Tax and Net Realized Investment Gains and Losses	$	39.4		11.3		$	35.4		$	76.0		7.6		$	70.6

Benefit Ratio (% of Premium Income)		55.2	%				56.8	%		55.4	%				56.6	%
Operating Expense Ratio (% of Premium Income)		18.8	%				18.8	%		19.0	%				18.7	%
Before-tax Operating Income Ratio (% of Premium Income)		21.4	%				20.6	%		20.8	%				20.6	%

Persistency - Income Protection and Accident and Sickness										75.4	%				75.4	%
Persistency - Life										87.5	%				87.8	%
Persistency - Cancer and Critical Illness										84.3	%				83.7	%

The Colonial segment includes insurance for income protection, accident and sickness, life, cancer, and critical illness issued by the Company’s subsidiary Colonial Life & Accident Insurance Company and marketed to employees at the workplace through an agency field sales force and brokers.

Segment Sales

The sales decrease in the second quarter and first six months of 2004 relative to the same period of 2003 is primarily attributable to a decline of 8.6 percent and 7.4 percent, respectively, in sales of the individual short-term income protection product as well as the impact from discontinuing new sales of group long-term income protection. Partially offsetting this decrease is an increase in the cancer and life products sales of 6.3 and 2.3 percent, respectively, relative to the second quarter of 2003 and 11.5 and 3.9 percent, respectively, relative to the first six months of 2003. The Company’s expectation is that sales momentum will return to positive growth in the Colonial segment during the second half of the year.

Operating Results

Growth in premium income was attributable primarily to favorable persistency. The 2004 second quarter and six months benefit ratio for this segment was slightly lower than the comparable periods of 2003 due primarily to a lower benefit ratio for the income protection product line. This resulted in an improvement in benefits and change in reserves of approximately $2.8 million and $6.0 million for the second quarter and first six months of 2004 relative to what would have been reported had the benefit ratio equaled that of the prior year. The individual short-term income protection line reported a stable claim incidence rate for the second quarter of 2004 compared to the same period last year. Individual short-term income protection claim incidence decreased for the first six months of 2004 compared with the prior year first six months while the average claim duration for closed claims was slightly higher in both the second quarter and first six months of 2004 relative to the comparable periods of 2003. The average indemnity for individual short-term income protection was higher in the second quarter and six months of 2004 relative to the second quarter and first six months of 2003. For accident and sickness, the claim incidence rate decreased in the second quarter and first six months of 2004 relative to the prior year periods, but the average claim payment increased over that reported from the second quarter and first six months of 2003. The life line of business reported an increase in the number of paid claims relative to the second quarter and first six months of 2003 and an increase in the average claim payment.

Segment Outlook

The Company’s key areas of focus in 2004 for Colonial are sales growth, revenue growth, and increased profitability. Continuation of efforts in providing quality service will also be a focus for the Company. Past sales results have not grown at the rate the Company believes it can competitively and profitably achieve. In the remainder of 2004, the emphasis will be on achieving consistent, profitable sales growth by focusing on the recruitment and productivity of agents, improved business tools, enhanced marketing research and development, balanced sales compensation, and focused recognition and incentive programs.

Growth in revenue and profitability will be driven by increasing premium income through sales growth and stable persistency while maintaining a focus on high-quality business and the management of expenses. Service is used as a differentiator for the Colonial segment in the marketplace. The two key drivers for effective service delivery are trained service professionals and effective use of technology. These key drivers will be emphasized by seeking to increase innovation, productivity, and performance through leadership development and technological advances.

Individual Income Protection - Closed Block Segment Operating Results

Shown below are financial results and key performance indicators for the Individual Income Protection – Closed Block segment.


(in millions of dollars, except ratios)

	Three Months Ended June 30								Six Months Ended June 30
	2004			% Change		2003			2004			% Change		2003
Operating Revenue
Premium Income	$	249.2		(4.3	)%	$	260.4		$	500.5		(5.4	)%	$	529.0
Net Investment Income		189.9		(5.5	)		200.9			402.9		(0.6	)		405.2
Other Income		20.2		(39.5	)		33.4			48.0		2.3			46.9

Total		459.3		(7.2	)		494.7			951.4		(3.0	)		981.1

Benefits and Expenses
Benefits and Change in Reserves for Future Benefits		371.4		(6.5	)		397.3			869.9		12.6			772.8
Commissions		18.4		(19.3	)		22.8			38.5		(20.3	)		48.3
Deferral of Policy Acquisition Costs		—		—			(2.3	)		—		—			(4.6	)
Amortization of Deferred Policy Acquisition Costs		—		—			10.4			—		—			20.9
Amortization of Value of Business Acquired		—		—			8.9			—		—			17.3
Impairment of Intangible Assets		—		—			—			856.4		N.M.			—
Operating Expenses		39.5		(24.5	)		52.3			80.4		(23.6	)		105.3

Total		429.3		(12.3	)		489.4			1,845.2		92.2			960.0

Operating Income (Loss) Before Income Tax and Net Realized Investment Gains and Losses	$	30.0		N.M.		$	5.3		$	(893.8	)	N.M.		$	21.1

Benefit Ratio (% of Premium Income) (1)		149.0	%				152.6	%		173.8	%				146.1	%
Interest Adjusted Loss Ratio		85.6	%				84.6	%		86.1	%				79.5	%
Operating Expense Ratio (% of Premium Income)		15.9	%				20.1	%		16.1	%				19.9	%
Before-tax Operating Income (Loss) Ratio (% of Premium Income) (2)		12.0	%				2.0	%		(178.6	)%				4.0	%
Persistency										94.4	%				94.5	%

(1)	Included in this ratio is the first quarter 2004 before-tax reserve strengthening of $110.6 million. Excluding this charge, the benefit ratio for the six months of 2004 would have been 151.7%.

(2)	Included in this ratio is the first quarter 2004 before-tax reserve strengthening of $110.6 million and the $856.4 million before-tax impairment of intangible assets. Excluding these charges, the before-tax operating income ratio for the six months of 2004 would have been 14.6%.

N.M. = not a meaningful percentage

The Individual Income Protection – Closed Block segment generally consists of those policies in force prior to the Company’s substantial changes in product offerings, pricing, distribution, and underwriting. These changes generally occurred during the period 1994 through 1998. A minimal amount of new business continued to be sold subsequent to these changes, but the Company ceased selling new policies in this segment at the beginning of 2004 other than update features contractually allowable on existing policies.

As previously discussed, in the first quarter of 2004, the Company restructured its individual income protection – closed block business wherein three of its insurance subsidiaries entered into reinsurance agreements that effectively provide approximately 60 percent reinsurance coverage for the Company’s overall consolidated risk above a specified retention limit. If losses to the reinsurer exceed a specified aggregate limit, any further losses will revert to the Company.

These reinsurance transactions were effective as of April 1, 2004. The Company transferred cash equal to $521.6 million of ceded reserves plus an additional $185.8 million in cash for a before-tax prepaid cost of insurance which was deferred and will be amortized into earnings over the expected claim payment period covered under the Company’s retention limit. The expected amortization of the prepaid cost is approximately $3.8 million for 2004 and $5.0 million annually thereafter.

Operating Results

Premium income decreased relative to the prior year due to the expected decline in this closed block of business and also due to a 2003 reinsurance transaction wherein the Company reinsured a block of individual income protection policies previously sold through trade associations. The transaction, which closed during the fourth quarter of 2003 with an effective date of April 1, 2003, reduced second quarter and first six months 2004 premium income relative to the second quarter and first six months of 2003 by approximately $6.4 million and $15.1 million, respectively. Net investment income declined in the second quarter and first six months of 2004 relative to the prior year periods due to a decline in the portfolio yield rate. Net investment income was also negatively impacted due to the cash held in conjunction with the pending transfer of cash for the reinsurance agreements entered into as part of the restructuring of this block. Other income includes the underlying results of the block of business which was reinsured with Centre Life Reinsurance Limited in 1996. This block of business reported decreased operating results for the second quarter of 2004 relative to the prior year second quarter, but for the first six months, the 2004 results were consistent with the prior year.

The net claim resolution rate increased in the second quarter and first six months of 2004 relative to the prior year comparable periods, resulting in decreases in benefits and change in reserves of $10.0 million and $20.0 million for the second quarter and first six months of 2004, respectively, relative to the comparable periods of 2003. The commission ratio and operating expense ratio both decreased relative to the second quarter and first six months of 2003, due primarily to a reduction in selling and underwriting expenses. A minimal amount of new business was still being sold during 2003, primarily related to update features on existing policies.

Included in the loss for the first six months of 2004 were the previously discussed first quarter charges of $282.2 million, $367.1 million, and $207.1 million related to the write-down of deferred policy acquisition costs, value of business acquired, and goodwill, respectively, and $110.6 million for the claim reserve charge, for a total of $967.0 million. Due to the impairment of intangible assets as of January 1, 2004, no “scheduled” amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs or value of business acquired was included in operating results for this segment. The amount of “scheduled” amortization would have been approximately $17.4 million and $33.5 million, respectively, for the second quarter and first six months of 2004 had the asset impairment not occurred.

Segment Outlook

The Company believes that the restructuring for this closed block of business has strengthened the balance sheet for this segment and minimized the Company’s exposure to potential future adverse morbidity. The Company expects no change in the level of service provided to policyholders of this business as a result of the restructuring. Total revenue is expected to decline very slowly over time as the Company believes that persistency will remain in the mid-90 percent range. The Company believes that the benefit ratio will be fairly flat during 2004 relative to 2003 as incidence is expected to remain at current levels or slightly lower, and the claim resolution rate is estimated to be at a level consistent with the second half of 2003. The expense ratio is expected to remain fairly consistent throughout the year with that reported for the first six months. As discussed previously, 2004 operating earnings relative to 2003 will be positively impacted due to the lack of amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs and value of business acquired.

Other Segment Operating Results


(in millions of dollars)

	Three Months Ended June 30						Six Months Ended June 30
	2004		% Change		2003		2004		% Change		2003
Operating Revenue
Premium Income	$	2.9	(61.8	)%	$	7.6	$	11.5	(34.7	)%	$	17.6
Net Investment Income		32.2	(15.7	)		38.2		64.2	(13.9	)		74.6
Other Income		9.1	1.1			9.0		19.8	(2.5	)		20.3

Total		44.2	(19.3	)		54.8		95.5	(15.1	)		112.5

Benefits and Expenses
Benefits and Change in Reserves for Future Benefits		29.0	(30.8	)		41.9		65.6	(19.1	)		81.1
Other Expenses		4.7	(23.0	)		6.1		12.3	(4.7	)		12.9

Total		33.7	(29.8	)		48.0		77.9	(17.1	)		94.0

Operating Income Before Income Tax and Net Realized Investment Gains and Losses	$	10.5	54.4		$	6.8	$	17.6	(4.9	)	$	18.5

The Other operating segment includes results from products no longer actively marketed (with the exception of the individual income protection – closed block), including, but not limited to, individual life, corporate-owned life insurance, and reinsurance pools and management operations. It is expected that operating revenue and income in this segment will decline over time as these business lines wind down. Management expects to reinvest the capital supporting these lines of business in the future growth of the Income Protection, Life and Accident, and Colonial segments. The closed lines of business have been segregated for reporting and monitoring purposes.

Reinsurance Pools and Management

The Company’s reinsurance operations include the reinsurance management operations of Duncanson & Holt, Inc. (D&H) and the risk assumption, which includes reinsurance pool participation; direct reinsurance which includes accident and health (A&H), long-term care (LTC), and long-term disability coverages; and Lloyd’s of London (Lloyd’s) syndicate participations. During the years 1999 through 2001, the Company exited its reinsurance pools and management operations through a combination of a sale, reinsurance, and/or placement of certain components in run-off. During the second quarter of 2004 and 2003, the reinsurance pools and management operations reported operating losses of $1.5 million and $4.1 million, respectively. For the first six months of 2004 and 2003, the operating losses were $4.1 million and $6.5 million, respectively.

Individual Life and Corporate-Owned Life

During 2000 the Company reinsured substantially all of the individual life and corporate-owned life insurance blocks of business. The $388.2 million before-tax gain on the reinsurance transactions was deferred and is being amortized into income based upon expected future premium income on the traditional insurance policies ceded and estimated future gross profits on the interest-sensitive insurance policies ceded. The unamortized balance of the deferred gain was $283.1 million at December 31, 2003. Total operating revenue was $10.3 million and $9.9 million for the second quarter of 2004 and 2003, respectively. Operating income for the same periods was $9.2 million and $8.5 million. For the first six months of 2004 and 2003, operating revenue was $20.0 million and $20.8 million, respectively, and operating income was $18.4 million and $18.0 million.

Other

Other closed lines of business within the Other segment had operating revenue of $37.7 million and $42.5 million in the second quarter of 2004 and 2003 and operating income of $2.8 million and $2.4 million. For the first six months of 2004 and 2003, operating revenue was $75.9 million and $81.7 million, respectively, and operating income was $3.3 million and $7.0 million. Included in these amounts are the operating results for the Company’s Argentinean

operation, which produced operating revenue of $8.0 million and $6.1 million in the second quarter of 2004 and 2003, respectively, and an equal amount of benefits and expenses for both periods. For the first six months of 2004 and 2003, operating revenue for the Argentinean operation was $16.0 million and $11.1 million, respectively. The operating loss was $0.6 million in the first six months of 2004 and essentially zero for the same period of 2003.

Corporate Segment Operating Results

The Corporate segment includes investment income on corporate assets not specifically allocated to a line of business, corporate interest expense, and certain corporate expenses not allocated to a line of business.

Operating revenue in the Corporate segment was $24.7 million in the second quarter of 2004 compared to $7.8 million in the same period of 2003. For the first six months, operating revenue was $29.2 million in 2004 and $13.6 million in 2003. Included in the second quarter and first six months of 2004 revenue is a $9.4 million curtailment gain related to changes in the Company’s retiree medical plan. See Note 6 of the “Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements” contained herein in Item 1 for further discussion of the Company’s postretirement benefits.

Also contributing to the second quarter and first six months of 2004 revenue increase is an increase in net investment income. The bonds retained from the sale of the Canadian branch had a fair value, at April 30, 2004, of $732.9 million and a yield of 7.14 percent. These investments are currently held primarily in the Corporate segment, but will be redeployed to other lines of business during the remainder of the year. These investments added approximately four basis points to the Company’s continuing operations investment portfolio yield rate at April 30, 2004.

The Corporate segment reported operating losses of $30.7 million and $45.2 million in the second quarter of 2004 and 2003, respectively, and $77.4 million and $99.6 million for the first six months of 2004 and 2003. Interest and debt expense increased from $45.9 million in the second quarter of 2003 to $51.5 million in 2004 due to the impact of the offerings in 2004 and 2003, as discussed under “Liquidity and Capital Resources.” For the first six months, interest and debt expense was $100.7 million in 2004 and $87.4 million in 2003. Included in first quarter and six month operating expenses for 2003 is approximately $15.0 million in severance and pension benefit payouts related to the change of the Company’s president and chief executive officer.

Discontinued Operations

During the fourth quarter of 2003, the Company entered into an agreement to sell its Canadian branch. The Canadian branch was accounted for as an asset held for sale at December 31, 2003 and is reported as a discontinued operation in the condensed consolidated financial statements.

In conjunction with the classification of the Canadian branch as an asset held for sale during the fourth quarter of 2003, the Company tested the goodwill related to the Canadian branch for impairment and determined that the balance of $190.9 million was impaired. The Company also recognized a loss of $6.0 million after tax to write down the value of bonds in the Canadian branch investment portfolio to market value. These two charges, which total $196.9 million after tax, were included in the fourth quarter of 2003 loss from discontinued operations. The Company recognized an additional loss of $0.4 million after tax in the first quarter of 2004 to further write down the value of bonds in the Canadian branch investment portfolio to market value. The transaction closed April 30, 2004, and in the second quarter of 2004, the Company reported a loss of $70.9 million after tax on the sale of the branch.

In the second quarter and first six months of 2004, income from discontinued operations, excluding the 2004 reported loss on the transaction, was $3.1 million and $10.5 million, net of tax. For the second quarter and six months of 2003, income from discontinued operations was $4.4 million and $7.0 million, net of tax.

See Note 2 of the “Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements” contained herein in Item 1 for further discussion of the Company’s discontinued operations.

Investments

Overview

Investment activities are an integral part of the Company’s business, and profitability is significantly affected by investment results. Invested assets are segmented into portfolios that support the various product lines. Generally, the investment strategy for the portfolios is to match the effective asset cash flows and durations with related expected liability cash flows and durations to consistently meet the liability funding requirements of the Company’s business. The Company seeks to maximize investment income and total return and to assume credit risk in a prudent and selective manner, subject to constraints of quality, liquidity, diversification, and regulatory considerations. The Company’s overall investment philosophy is to invest in a portfolio of high quality assets that provide investment returns consistent with that assumed in the pricing of its insurance products. Assets are invested predominately in fixed maturity securities, and the portfolio is matched with liabilities so as to eliminate as much as possible the Company’s exposure to changes in the overall level of interest rates. The Company invests for the long term, with the weighted average duration of its liability portfolio approximately 8.27 years at June 30, 2004. The weighted average duration of the Company’s investment portfolio supporting those policyholder liabilities was 8.49 years at June 30, 2004, and the weighted average credit rating was A3.

The Company is able to hold to this investment philosophy throughout a credit cycle because of its capital position, the fixed nature of its liabilities, and the matching of those liabilities with assets and also because of the experience gained through many years of a consistent investment philosophy. It is the Company’s intent, and has been its practice, to hold investments to maturity to meet liability payments.

Below is a summary of the Company’s formal investment policy, including the overall quality and diversification objectives.

•

The majority of investments are in high quality publicly traded securities to ensure the desired liquidity and preserve the capital value of the Company’s portfolios.

•

The long-term nature of the Company’s insurance liabilities also allows it to invest in less liquid investments to obtain superior returns. A maximum of 10 percent of the total investment portfolio may be invested in below-investment-grade investments, two percent in equity type instruments, up to 35 percent in private placements, and five percent in commercial mortgage loans. The remaining assets can be held in publicly traded investment-grade corporate securities, mortgage-backed securities, asset-backed securities, and municipal securities. The Company does not currently intend to invest in additional real estate.

•

The Company intends to manage the risk of losses due to changes in interest rates by matching asset duration with liabilities to within a range of +/- 3 years.

•

The weighted average credit quality rating of the portfolio should be BBB or higher.

•

The maximum investment per issuer group is limited based on internal limits established by the Company’s board of directors and is more restrictive than the 5 percent limit generally allowed by the state insurance departments which regulate the type of investments the Company’s insurance subsidiaries are allowed to own. These internal limits are as follows:


Rating		Internal Limit
		($ in millions)
AAA/A		$150
BBB		100
BBB-		75
BB/BBB-		60
BB		50
B/BB		40
B		20

•

The portfolio is to be diversified across industry classification and geographic lines.

•

Derivative instruments may be used to hedge interest rate risk and match liability duration and cash flows consistent with the plan approved by the board of directors.

•

Asset mix guidelines and limits are established by the Company and approved by the board of directors.

•

The allocation of assets and the selection and timing of the acquisition and disposition of investments are subject to ratification by the investment subcommittee of the board of directors on a weekly basis. These actions are also reviewed and approved by the board of directors on a quarterly basis.

•

These investment policies and guidelines are reviewed and appropriately adjusted by the board of directors annually, or more frequently if deemed necessary.

As previously discussed, during 2003 the Company entered into an agreement to sell its Canadian branch. The transaction closed effective April 30, 2004. Historical information pertaining to the Canadian branch is reported as discontinued operations in the condensed consolidated financial statements and as such, the assets and liabilities are reported separately in the Company’s condensed consolidated statements of financial condition. The Company retained a portion of the Canadian branch fixed maturity bond portfolio according to the terms of the transaction. Because the specific investments to be transferred to the buyer had not been identified for reporting periods ended prior to the closing, the disclosures on the following pages for 2003 will in some instances necessarily include the total Canadian investment portfolio, including those transferred to the buyer at the close of the transaction, with an appropriate disclosure noting that the information includes fixed maturity securities reported separately as discontinued operations in the condensed consolidated statements of financial condition.

Investment Results

Net investment income decreased $2.1 million in the second quarter of 2004, or 0.4 percent, as compared to the previous year second quarter. For the six months ended June 30, net investment income increased $12.7 million in 2004 relative to 2003. The overall yield in the portfolio was 6.99 percent as of June 30, 2004. The overall yield in the portfolio, including fixed maturity securities reported as discontinued operations, was 7.40 percent as of June 30, 2003, and 7.15 percent at the end of 2003. In the current low interest rate market, the Company expects that the portfolio yield will continue to gradually decline, until the market rates increase above the level of the overall yield, due to lower yields on new purchases.

As of June 30, 2004, the Company’s exposure to below-investment-grade fixed maturity securities was approximately 6.6 percent of the carrying value of invested assets excluding ceded policy loans, compared to 7.8 percent at the end of 2003 and 10.4 percent at the end of 2002. This asset class had increased during 2002 primarily from downgrades of existing securities that were previously investment-grade rather than the purchase of additional below-investment-grade securities. During the first quarter of 2003, the Company initiated a program to reduce its below-investment-grade fixed maturity securities holdings to comply with its investment policy regarding diversification and to better position the investment portfolio in the current environment and reduce exposure to potential credit-related losses. The program was substantially complete at the end of the first quarter of 2003, with sales of approximately $760.9 million in market value and $758.6 million in book value. Gross gains of $23.1 million and gross losses of $20.8 million were recognized on the sale of these securities during the first quarter of 2003.

The Company reported before-tax realized investment gains and losses during the second quarter and first six months of 2004 and 2003 as shown in the following chart, which excludes an estimate of realized investment gains and losses in 2003 related to the fixed maturity securities reported as discontinued operations. Write-downs were recognized as a result of management’s determination that the value of certain fixed maturity and equity securities had other than temporarily declined during the applicable reporting period, as well as the result of further declines in the values of fixed maturity and equity securities that had initially been written down in a prior period. The value of the securities was determined to have other than temporarily declined or to have further declined from the initial impairment based on the factors discussed herein in “Critical Accounting Policies.” The Company anticipates additional investment losses may occur during 2004, although at a level below that experienced in 2003.

The Company adopted the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 133 Implementation Issue B36 (DIG Issue B36), Embedded Derivatives: Modified Coinsurance Arrangements and Debt Instruments That Incorporate Credit Risk Exposure That Are Unrelated or Only Partially Related to the Creditworthiness of the Obligor Under Those Instruments, effective October 1, 2003. The second quarter and six months of 2004 realized investment gains and losses include changes in fair values of the embedded derivatives, as shown in the following chart.


(in millions of dollars)

	Three Months Ended June 30						Six Months Ended June 30
	2004			2003			2004			2003
Gross Realized Investment Gain
Sales	$	22.8		$	56.3		$	52.2		$	108.5
Increase in Fair Value of DIG Issue B36 Derivatives		14.3			—			60.1			—

Total		37.1			56.3			112.3			108.5

Gross Realized Investment Loss
Write-downs		10.5			31.5			35.9			134.9
Sales		23.5			51.3			43.0			85.2
Decrease in Fair Value of DIG Issue B36 Derivatives		89.6			—			94.5			—

Total		123.6			82.8			173.4			220.1

Net Realized Investment Loss	$	(86.5	)	$	(26.5	)	$	(61.1	)	$	(111.6	)

The following discussion of write-downs includes those representing five percent or greater of the total write-downs for the respective periods presented, the circumstances that contributed to the write-downs, the length of time the security had been in a continual loss position, whether it was investment-grade or below-investment-grade at the time of initial purchase and at the time of the write-down, and how the circumstances of the write-down might cause impairments in other material investments held by the Company. Approximately 59 percent of the 2004 year-to-date write-downs in continuing operations occurred in the automotive and financial institutions industries, and approximately 46 percent of the 2003 full year write-downs in continuing operations occurred in the energy and utilities industries.

Realized Investment Losses during First Six Months of 2004 from Write-downs

•

$12.0 million loss during the first quarter of 2004 on senior notes issued by a United Kingdom based engineering and manufacturing company engaged in the bus and automotive industry. The company experienced a rapid deterioration in business prospects at its main operating unit in late 2003 and early 2004, followed by the discovery of bookkeeping fraud at one of its business units. Both of these issues were discovered and disclosed to the company’s banks and note holders by outside financial consultants during the first quarter of 2004. The company filed for U.K. administration on March 31, 2004. The securities were investment-grade at the time of purchase but were downgraded to below-investment-grade in the third quarter of 2003. At the time of the write-down, these securities had been in an unrealized loss position for a period of greater than 180 days but less than 270 days. The circumstances of this impaired investment have no impact on other investments.

•

$5.2 million loss during the second quarter of 2004 on securities issued by a U.S. based heavy construction company. The company has been struggling with a number of problem projects and is below plan in attaining new business. This continued financial stress culminated in the company’s failure to make its monthly interest payment for June 2004. These bonds are secured by a number of real estate properties. These securities were investment-grade at the time of purchase, but were downgraded to below-investment-grade in the third quarter of 2002. At the time of the write-down, these securities had been continuously in an unrealized loss position for a period of greater than two years but less than three years. The circumstances of this impaired investment have no impact on other investments.

•

$4.5 million aggregate loss during the first and second quarters of 2004 on structured securities issued by a trust and collateralized by a pool of high yield bonds. The Company performs a periodic review of the estimated cash flows associated with all of its securitized high yield securities. After the most recent review, it was determined that an adverse change in estimated cash flows had occurred for these securities. The investment was originally purchased as part of the Company’s below-investment-grade strategy. At the time of the initial write-down, these securities had been in an unrealized loss position for a period of greater than two years but less than three years. The circumstances of this impaired investment have no impact on other investments.

•

$3.9 million loss during the first quarter of 2004 on securities issued by a Brazilian electric generation company. This company experienced short-term liquidity problems, significant issues at affiliated companies, concerns regarding local utility regulation, and the weak Brazilian economy. Certain changes to the terms of these notes relative to the timing of principal and interest repayments were agreed upon by the note holders subsequent to negotiations finalized in the first quarter of 2004 and in conjunction with a comprehensive restructuring of the borrower’s parent company operations in Brazil. The securities were investment-grade at the time of purchase but were downgraded to below-investment-grade in the fourth quarter of 2002. At the time of the write-down, these securities had been in an unrealized loss position for a period of greater than one year but less than two years. The circumstances of this impaired investment have no impact on other investments.

•

$2.5 million loss during the first quarter of 2004 on securities issued by a trust and collateralized by commercial aircraft. These securities are secured by a second lien on commercial aircraft. The underlying aircraft were leased to a U.S. based cargo carrier that filed for bankruptcy in the first quarter of 2004. As part of the restructuring, the lease rates and payment schedule on the leased aircraft were amended. The securities were investment-grade at the time of purchase but were downgraded to below-investment-grade in the third quarter of 2002. At the time of the write-down, these securities had been in an unrealized loss position for a period of greater than two years but less than three years. The circumstances of this impaired investment have no impact on other investments.

•

$2.3 million loss during the first quarter of 2004 on private equity securities issued by a U.S. based insurance services company. The Company initially recognized an impairment loss on these securities in the first quarter of 2002 due to the negative revenue impact resulting from the company’s loss of a single large client. The Company closely monitored the financial performance of the company during 2002 and 2003. In 2004, following a review of the company’s capital condition, its revenue and earnings performance, and discussions with company management, it was determined that the investment was further impaired. The investment was originally purchased as part of the Company’s private equity investment program. At the time of the write-down in 2004, this investment had not previously been in an unrealized gain or loss position subsequent to the initial write-down in 2002. The circumstances of this impaired investment have no impact on other investments.

Realized Investment Losses during Full Year 2003 from Write-downs

•

$26.4 million loss during the first quarter of 2003 on securities issued by a related entity of a U.S. based energy company. The securities were issued by a utility company that services an industrial site in England and whose 98 percent parent filed for insolvency in December 2001. This issuer was excluded from the parent’s insolvency filing due to the financial separation from the parent and was operating as a going concern during 2002. Despite the financial separation, the issuer’s securities were downgraded to below-investment-grade in the fourth quarter of 2001. The Company initially recognized an impairment loss on these securities at the time of the parent’s insolvency filing in 2001. These bonds were secured by a second lien on the real estate holdings of the company. The Company closely monitored this security and the value of the collateral during 2002. Following extensive negotiations during 2002 and the first quarter of 2003 with the company’s two other lenders, financial advisors, and counsel, it was determined that the investment was further impaired. Prior to its write-down in 2003, the investment had been in an unrealized loss position for a period of greater than 270 days but less than one year. The circumstances of this impaired investment have no impact on other investments.

•

$18.1 million loss during the first quarter of 2003 on securities issued by a Norwegian based energy services company engaged in offshore seismic surveying and floating production. The write-down was taken after further analysis of available information indicated the company’s lack of near term liquidity and that overall industry conditions in the energy sector had negatively affected the operations more than previous analysis had indicated. The securities were investment-grade at the time of purchase but were downgraded to below-investment-grade in the third quarter of 2002. At the time of the write-down, these securities had been continuously in an unrealized loss position for a period of greater than three years. The circumstances of this impaired investment have no impact on other investments.

•

$14.4 million loss during the first quarter of 2003 on securities issued by a United Kingdom electrical generation subsidiary of a U.S. based company. Although this industry’s operating environment in the U.K. weakened over the past few years due to competitive pricing pressures, the company had benefited from a favorable, long-term power sales agreement with a large, investment-grade U.K. power customer. Depressed electricity prices in the merchant power market and operating problems at the company, as well as financial difficulties experienced by the company’s U.K. power customer, contributed to a weakened financial profile. In October 2002, the financial problems associated with the major U.K. customer resulted in the termination of the favorable power contract. The company made its December 2002 interest payments as scheduled. However, due to discussions that were initiated between the issuer and senior lenders in the first quarter of 2003 and the continued weakness in the U.K. power market, it was determined that this investment was other than temporarily impaired. The securities were investment-grade at the time of purchase but were downgraded to below-investment-grade in the fourth quarter of 2001. Prior to its write-down, the investment had been in an unrealized loss position for a period of greater than one year but less than two years. The Company also owns securities in the previously mentioned U.K. power customer of this issuer and previously recorded an impairment loss on those securities in the fourth quarter of 2002.

•

$11.3 million loss during the second quarter of 2003 on securities issued by a regulated natural gas pipeline company located in Argentina. The write-down was taken following continued delays by the Argentine government in implementing tariff reform and the company’s default on its interest payment due during the second quarter. These securities were investment-grade at the time of purchase but were downgraded to below-investment-grade in the second quarter of 2001. At the time of the write-down, these securities had been continuously in an unrealized loss position for a period of greater than two years but less than three years. The circumstances of this impaired investment have no impact on other investments.

•

$11.1 million loss during the fourth quarter of 2003 on securities issued by a leading producer of performance products for the automotive industry and nylon fibers for the carpet industry. The securities were investment-grade at the time of purchase but were downgraded to below-investment-grade in the first quarter of 2002. The issuer was current on its interest payments as of September 30, 2003, but filed for bankruptcy in December 2003, despite having implemented several successful measures which improved liquidity and reduced potential legal liabilities. At the time of the write-down, these securities had been continuously in an unrealized loss position for a period of greater than 1 year but less than two years. The circumstances of this impaired investment have no impact on other investments.

•

$11.0 million loss during the third quarter of 2003 on securities issued by a travel services company located in the United Kingdom. The write-down was taken following discussions between the issuer and its creditors regarding difficulties in the issuer’s businesses due to geopolitical unrest and persistent weakness in demand for leisure travel and requests for certain waivers and consents of debt covenants. These securities were investment-grade at the time of purchase but were downgraded to below-investment-grade in the first quarter of 2003. At the time of the write-down, these securities had been continuously in an unrealized loss position for a period of greater than 270 days but less than one year. The circumstances of this impaired investment have no impact on other investments.

Realized Investment Losses during First Six Months of 2004 from Sale of Fixed Maturity Securities

For the second quarter and first six months of 2004, the Company realized a loss of $22.7 million and $34.7 million, respectively, on the sale of fixed maturity securities in its continuing operations. The securities sold during the second quarter of 2004 had a book value of $188.0 million and a fair value of $165.3 million at the time of sale and represented 28 different issuers. For the first six months, the securities sold had a book value of $342.4 million and

a fair value of $307.7 million at the time of sale and represented 43 different issuers. Realized investment losses representing five percent or more of the total loss recognized during the first six months of 2004 are as follows:

•

$5.1 million aggregate loss during the first and second quarters of 2004 on the sale of securities issued by a leading builder of power plants and a provider of electricity generation in the U.S., Canada, and the United Kingdom. The company had suffered from an over supply of power generation in most of the markets in which it operates. In addition, the company had experienced weak cash flow and high debt ratios as a result of weak industry and economic fundamentals. These securities were originally purchased as part of the Company’s below-investment-grade strategy. At the time of the sale, these securities had been continuously in an unrealized loss position for a period of greater than two years but less than three years. The circumstances of this investment have no impact on other investments.

•

$4.3 million aggregate loss during the first and second quarters of 2004 on the sale of securities linked to the credit of a U.S. based supermarket chain. These securities are participation certificates in a trust, benefiting from first mortgage liens on a portfolio of strategically key real estate properties which are net leased on a non-cancelable basis to the supermarket chain. The supermarket chain has experienced deterioration in its market position and financial performance over the last several years and has had its credit rating lowered from investment-grade to below-investment grade in the first quarter of 2001. At the time of the sale, these securities had been continuously in an unrealized loss position for a period of greater than three years. The circumstances of this investment have no impact on other investments.

•

$4.0 million aggregate loss during the first and second quarters of 2004 on the sale of securities issued by a large domestic based airline. The company has been suffering from the aftermath of September 11^th, a higher cost structure, and industry overcapacity. The Company sold the securities to reduce its exposure to the airline. These securities had an investment-grade rating until being downgraded to below-investment-grade in the third quarter of 2001. At the time of the sale, these securities had been continuously in an unrealized loss position for a period of greater than two years but less than three years. The circumstances of this investment have no impact on other investments.

•

$2.4 million loss during the first quarter of 2004 on the sale of securities issued by a provider of phone, cable, and internet services. The company’s operations had been severely impacted by the decline in the telecommunication and internet markets. The securities were sold following the issuer’s decision not to pay a scheduled interest payment on another note even though the company stated that it had sufficient liquidity to make the payment. These securities were originally purchased as part of the Company’s below-investment-grade strategy. At the time of the sale, these securities had been continuously in an unrealized loss position for a period of greater than three years. The circumstances of this investment have no impact on other investments.

•

$2.1 million loss during the second quarter of 2004 on the sale of securities issued by a large domestic based airline. The company has been suffering from the aftermath of September 11^th and industry overcapacity. The Company sold the securities to reduce its exposure to the airline. These securities had an investment- grade rating until being downgraded to below-investment-grade in the first quarter of 2002. At the time of the sale, these securities had been continuously in an unrealized loss position for a period of greater than three years. The circumstances of this investment have no impact on other investments.

•

$2.1 million aggregate loss during the first and second quarters of 2004 on the sale of securities issued by a provider of local, long-distance, data, and wireless services. The company’s operations had been negatively impacted by the decline in the telecommunication and internet markets. These securities had an investment-grade rating until downgraded to below-investment-grade in the second quarter of 2002. At the time of the sale, this security had been continuously in an unrealized loss position for a period of greater than two years but less than three years. The circumstances of this investment have no impact on other investments.

Realized Investment Losses during First Six Months and Full Year 2003 from Sale of Fixed Maturity Securities

For the second quarter and first six months of 2003, the Company realized a loss of $44.3 million and $75.4 million, respectively, on the sale of fixed maturity securities in its continuing operations. The securities sold during the second quarter and first six months of 2003 had a book value of $265.5 million and $614.5 million, respectively, and a fair value of $221.2 million and $539.1 million, respectively at the time of sale. These sales for the second quarter and first six months of 2003 represented 34 and 82 different issuers, respectively. For the year ended December 31, 2003, the Company realized a loss of $143.6 million on the sale of fixed maturity securities in its continuing operations. The securities sold during the year had a book value of $821.0 million and a fair value of $677.4 million at the time of sale and represented 94 different issuers, of which approximately 59 percent were a part of the Company’s previously discussed program to reduce its below-investment-grade fixed maturity securities holdings. Realized investment losses representing five percent or more of the total loss recognized during 2003 are as follows:

•

$28.1 million aggregate loss during the third and fourth quarters of 2003 on securities issued by a leading producer of performance products for the automotive industry and nylon fibers for the carpet industry. The company’s operations had been severely impacted by the increased price of raw materials and energy as well as a weakening demand for its products. In addition, the company was involved in an environmental pollution lawsuit with a potentially large negative impact. These securities had an investment-grade rating until downgraded to below-investment-grade in the first quarter of 2002. At the time of sale, the investment had been continuously in an unrealized loss position for a period of greater than three years. The circumstances of this investment have no impact on other investments.

•

$25.2 million loss during the fourth quarter of 2003 on the sale of securities guaranteed by an Italian dairy company. The loss was incurred after it was revealed that the guarantor had engaged in massive fraud, ultimately leading to the company’s bankruptcy. The guarantor had been rated investment-grade until December 2003. At the time of the sale, the investment had been in an unrealized loss position for a period of less than 90 days. The Company also owns $22.5 million of fixed maturity securities of a wholly-owned Canadian subsidiary of the parent company. Although the financial and operating profiles of the subsidiary are separate from the parent and no other than temporary impairment was deemed to exist, in conjunction with the classification of the Canadian branch as an asset held for sale, the Company recognized a loss of $4.0 million to write down the value of these securities, which are held in the Canadian branch investment portfolio, to market value. This loss is included in the loss from discontinued operations.

•

$15.2 million aggregate loss during the first three quarters of 2003 on the sale of debt issued by a major domestic airline. The Company has systematically sold the securities during the first nine months of 2003 to substantially reduce its exposure to the airline. These securities had an investment-grade rating until the various issues were downgraded to below-investment-grade in the third quarter of 2001 and the first quarter of 2002. At the time of the initial sale, the investment had been in an unrealized loss position for a period of greater than one year but less than two years. The Company also took an other than temporary impairment charge of $0.3 million on the value of certain private, secured debt obligations of this issuer as part of a consensual restructuring proposal.

•

$11.1 million aggregate loss during the second and fourth quarters of 2003 on the sale of unsecured debt and private, secured debt obligations issued by a major domestic airline. The Company sold the securities to reduce its exposure to the airline. These securities had an investment-grade rating until downgraded in the third quarter of 2001. At the time of sale, the investment had been in an unrealized loss position for a period of greater than one year but less than two years. The circumstances of this investment have no impact on other investments.

•

$9.2 million aggregate loss during the second and fourth quarters of 2003 on the sale of securities issued by a provider of phone, cable, and internet services. This company’s operations were severely impacted by the decline in the telecommunications market and thus, the decision was made to reduce the exposure to this company. These securities were originally purchased as part of the Company’s below-investment-grade strategy. At the time of sale, this security had been continuously in an unrealized loss position for a period of greater than three years. The circumstances of this investment have no impact on other investments.

Asset Distribution

The following table provides the distribution of invested assets for the periods indicated, excluding the fixed maturity securities reported as discontinued operations at December 31, 2003. Ceded policy loans of $2.7 billion as of June 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003, which are reported on a gross basis in the condensed consolidated statements of financial condition contained herein in Item 1, are excluded from the table below. The investment income on these ceded policy loans is not included in income.

Distribution of Invested Assets


	June 30 2004		December 31 2003
Investment-Grade Fixed Maturity Securities	88.4	%	88.5	%
Below-Investment-Grade Fixed Maturity Securities	6.6		7.8
Equity Securities	0.1		0.1
Mortgage Loans	1.4		1.5
Real Estate	0.1		0.1
Short-term Investments	2.6		1.1
Other Invested Assets	0.8		0.9

Total	100.0	%	100.0	%

Fixed Maturity Securities

Fixed maturity securities at June 30, 2004, included $29.7 billion, or 99.7 percent, of bonds and $97.2 million, or 0.3 percent, of redeemable preferred stocks. The following table shows the fair value composition by internal industry classification of the fixed maturity bond portfolio and the associated unrealized gains and losses.

Fixed Maturity Bonds – By Industry Classification

As of June 30, 2004


(in millions of dollars)

Classification	Fair Value		Net Unrealized Gain (Loss)			Fair Value of Bonds with Gross Unrealized Loss		Gross Unrealized Loss			Fair Value of Bonds with Gross Unrealized Gain		Gross Unrealized Gain
Basic Industry	$	2,226.5	$	113.1		$	615.8	$	(40.9	)	$	1,610.7	$	154.0
Canadian		323.7		62.7								323.7		62.7
Capital Goods		2,154.4		162.0			475.1		(26.5	)		1,679.3		188.5
Communications		2,495.1		181.1			589.6		(46.6	)		1,905.5		227.7
Consumer Cyclical		1,317.3		56.4			298.8		(13.4	)		1,018.5		69.8
Consumer Non-Cyclical		3,319.4		169.9			1,184.1		(53.4	)		2,135.3		223.3
Derivative Instruments		175.7		143.1			5.4		(16.0	)		170.3		159.1
Energy (Oil & Gas)		2,558.0		234.7			317.1		(14.7	)		2,240.9		249.4
Financial Institutions		2,389.0		4.5			1,317.7		(108.6	)		1,071.3		113.1
Mortgage/Asset Backed		4,036.5		351.1			454.7		(8.6	)		3,581.8		359.7
Sovereigns		746.6		1.8			521.9		(18.1	)		224.7		19.9
Technology		288.1		9.1			104.4		(8.1	)		183.7		17.2
Transportation		1,021.7		51.8			219.1		(40.3	)		802.6		92.1
U.S. Government Agencies and Municipalities		1,858.9		(92.1	)		1,528.5		(194.3	)		330.4		102.2
Utilities		4,821.3		217.4			1,502.3		(103.4	)		3,319.0		320.8

Total	$	29,732.2	$	1,666.6		$	9,134.5	$	(692.9	)	$	20,597.7	$	2,359.5

As of June 30, 2004, $506.2 million or 73.1 percent of the unrealized losses in the fixed maturity bond portfolio were concentrated in communications, consumer non-cyclical, financial institutions, U.S. government agencies and municipalities, and utilities. The Company’s current view of risk factors relative to these industries is as follows:

Communications: This sector includes media, cable, telecommunications, and internet data companies. This sector encountered significant difficulties following the downturn of the technology and telecom industries in 2001. The last two years have been characterized by reductions in capital expenditures resulting in improved levels of cash flow that most companies used to reduce debt, strengthen the balance sheet, and improve financial flexibility. Competition within the industry is expected to remain intense. However, overall the industry is stable and some upgrades are expected as operating results continue to improve.

Consumer Non-Cyclical: This sector includes beverages, food, drug stores, supermarkets, healthcare, and pharmaceutical companies and represents companies whose earnings are historically less sensitive to economic cycles. While this sector is “non-cyclical,” the slowdown in the economy has still impacted these companies. The overall sector has seen a change in consumer spending habits during recent years. Consumers have been more inclined to be value conscious in their food purchases, and the healthcare sector has been impacted by the increase in uninsured patients. Over the last two quarters, these sectors have shown stronger results, but they still have challenging issues. The pharmaceutical companies continue to have litigation risk, the healthcare distribution companies are experiencing a decrease in profit margins, and the supermarkets and drug stores are in very competitive environments. The overall outlook for this sector is stable.

Financial Institutions: This sector entered the recent economic slowdown with record capital levels and strong profitability. Bank balance sheets withstood the increased loan write-offs through the recent economic cycle. Credit quality continues to improve in the financial services sector. Results for the second quarter of 2004 are expected to show moderate commercial and consumer loan growth. Profitability is expected to remain strong for the group. Mergers and acquisitions have increased recently, primarily because loan losses have been controlled and banks are in a position of relative excess capital and slower than desired organic growth. Some banks, brokers, and asset managers have been challenged by regulatory authorities regarding their trading practices. Although these are serious allegations, the outcome is not expected to materially change the positive momentum of the industry as a whole. Approximately $45.9 million of the unrealized losses in this industry sector can be attributed to certain principal protected equity linked notes held by the Company. See the following discussion of “Gross Unrealized Losses on Fixed Maturity Bonds $10 Million or Greater.”

U.S. Government Agencies and Municipalities: This sector includes the U.S. Government Treasury Department, government agencies, and government-sponsored enterprises. The sector has minimal credit risk and excellent liquidity, which enables the Company to maintain a higher limitation on investments in these subsectors.

Utilities: This sector, which includes regulated electric utilities, gas transmission and distribution companies, and independent power projects, has generally shown signs of improvement this year compared to the difficult environment that has existed over the past few years. Many companies have reduced their business risk by exiting or reducing their exposure to non-regulated operations such as merchant power and energy trading and are focusing instead on their core regulated businesses. Balance sheets have been strengthened through the sale of non-core assets and the repayment of debt. In addition, the improving economy has helped increase the industrial load. However, there are still industry challenges that exist including a continuing oversupply of generating capacity in several regions of the country. Those merchant generators exposed to natural gas as an input continue to see narrow margins due to the high cost of that commodity. State regulation has delayed or reduced anticipated rate increases in certain states. Some litigation remains as a result of improprieties during the western states power crisis in 2001 and 2002, and monetary damages are expected from a limited number of companies.

The following table is a distribution of the maturity dates for fixed maturity bonds in an unrealized loss position at June 30, 2004.

Fixed Maturity Bonds – By Maturity

As of June 30, 2004


(in millions of dollars)

	Fair Value of Bonds with Gross Unrealized Loss		Gross Unrealized Loss
Due after 1 year up to 5 years	$	436.8	$	(17.3	)
Due after 5 years up to 10 years		1,664.6		(97.4	)
Due after 10 years		6,578.4		(569.6	)

Subtotal		8,679.8		(684.3	)
Mortgage-Backed Securities		454.7		(8.6	)

Total	$	9,134.5	$	(692.9	)

Of the $692.9 million in gross unrealized losses at June 30, 2004, $557.0 million, or 80.4 percent, are related to investment-grade fixed maturity bonds. The following table shows the length of time the Company’s investment-grade fixed maturity bonds had been in a gross unrealized loss position as of June 30, 2004.

Unrealized Loss on Investment-Grade Fixed Maturity Bonds

Length of Time in Unrealized Loss Position

As of June 30, 2004


(in millions of dollars)

	Fair Value		Gross Unrealized Loss
<=90 days	$	4,848.4	$	(166.4	)
>90<=180 days		177.7		(8.1	)
>180<=270 days		199.3		(7.7	)
>270 days <=1 year		1,493.0		(110.2	)
>1 year<=2 years		1,160.1		(213.1	)
>2 years<=3 years		126.5		(11.2	)
>3 years		90.3		(40.3	)

Totals	$	8,095.3	$	(557.0	)

The following table shows the length of time the Company’s below-investment-grade fixed maturity bonds had been in a gross unrealized loss position as of June 30, 2004. The fair value and gross unrealized losses are categorized by the relationship of the current fair value to amortized cost for those securities on June 30, 2004. The fair value to amortized cost relationships are not necessarily indicative of the fair value to amortized cost relationships for the securities throughout the entire time that the securities have been in an unrealized loss position nor are they necessarily indicative of the relationships subsequent to June 30, 2004.

Unrealized Loss on Below-Investment-Grade Fixed Maturity Bonds

Length of Time in Unrealized Loss Position

As of June 30, 2004


(in millions of dollars)

	Fair Value		Gross Unrealized Loss
<=90 days
fair value <100% >= 70% of amortized cost	$	298.9	$	(9.5	)

>90<=180 days
fair value <100% >= 70% of amortized cost		65.0		(4.8	)

>180<=270 days
fair value <100% >= 70% of amortized cost		6.8		(2.2	)

>270 days <=1 year
fair value <100% >= 70% of amortized cost		14.6		(2.0	)

>1 year<=2 years
fair value <100% >= 70% of amortized cost		254.4		(30.6	)

>2 years<=3 years
fair value <100% >= 70% of amortized cost		237.6		(39.5	)
fair value < 70% >= 40% of amortized cost		30.3		(21.7	)

Subtotal		267.9		(61.2	)


>3 years
fair value <100% >= 70% of amortized cost		116.2		(17.1	)
fair value < 70% >= 40% of amortized cost		15.4		(8.5	)

Subtotal		131.6		(25.6	)

Totals	$	1,039.2	$	(135.9	)

As of June 30, 2004, the Company held securities with a gross unrealized loss of $10.0 million or greater, as shown in the chart below.

Gross Unrealized Losses on Fixed Maturity Bonds

$10 Million or Greater

As of June 30, 2004


(in millions of dollars)

Fixed Maturity Bonds	Fair Value		Gross Unrealized Loss			Length of Time in a Loss Position
Investment-Grade
U.S. Government Sponsored Mortgage Funding Company	$	276.6	$	(13.1	)	<=90 days
U.S. Government Sponsored Mortgage Funding Company		606.9		(148.4	)	>270 days<1 year
U.S. Government Sponsored Mortgage Funding Company		396.1		(20.0	)	>270 days<1 year
Principal Protected Equity Linked Note		39.3		(25.1	)	>3 years
Principal Protected Equity Linked Note		47.2		(15.1	)	>3 years

Total Investment-Grade	$	1,366.1	$	(221.7	)

Below-Investment-Grade
U.S. Telecommunications Company		65.8		(12.0	)	>2 years<=3 years
Notes Backed by Aircraft Leases to two U.S. Based Airlines		14.2		(10.3	)	>2 years<=3 years

Total Below-Investment-Grade	$	80.0	$	(22.3	)

Unrealized losses on investment-grade fixed maturity securities principally relate to changes in interest rates or changes in market or sector credit spreads which occurred subsequent to the acquisition of the securities. These changes are generally temporary and are not recognized as realized investment losses unless the securities are sold or become other than temporarily impaired. Generally, below-investment-grade fixed maturity securities are more likely to develop credit concerns. As previously discussed under “Critical Accounting Policies” contained herein, in determining whether a decline in fair value below amortized cost of a fixed maturity security is other than temporary, the Company utilizes a formal, well-defined, and disciplined process to monitor and evaluate its fixed income investment portfolio. It includes certain members of senior management in addition to the Company’s other investment and accounting professionals. The process results in a thorough evaluation of problem investments and write-downs on a timely basis of investments determined to have an other than temporary impairment.

For those fixed maturity securities with an unrealized loss and on which the Company has not recorded an impairment write-down, the Company believes that the decline in fair value below amortized cost is temporary. The Company has the ability to hold its securities to the earlier of recovery or maturity and intends to hold all of its fixed maturity investments until maturity to meet its liability obligations. If information becomes available that changes the Company’s assessment as to whether the Company will receive contractual payments related to a fixed maturity security and the security is also not projected to recover in value, the related security is generally sold. The Company may also in certain circumstances sell a security because of industry or environmental issues, to extend the duration of the investment portfolio, in response to mergers between issuers or other events which result in positions in excess of the Company’s investment guidelines, and to take advantage of tender offers.

For those securities with a gross unrealized loss of $10.0 million or greater, further discussed as follows are (a) the factors which the Company believes resulted in the impairment and (b) the information the Company considered, both positive and negative, in reaching the conclusion that the impairments were not other than temporary.

The fixed maturity bonds of the three U.S. government sponsored mortgage funding companies were issued from the Federal National Mortgage Association, the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation, and the Federal Home Loan Bank, respectively. The bonds were all rated AAA by Standard & Poor’s Corporation (S&P) as of June 30, 2004, with no negative outlook in analysts’ reports. The changes in the market values of these securities relate to changes in interest rates subsequent to the purchase of the bonds. The Company believes that the decline in fair value of these securities is temporary. The Company has the ability to hold these securities to the earlier of recovery or maturity and intends to hold its fixed maturity investments until maturity to meet its liability obligations.

The first principal protected equity linked note is a zero coupon bond, issued by a large, well capitalized Fortune 500 financial services company, the return of which is linked to a Vanguard S&P 500 index mutual fund. This bond matures on August 24, 2020 and carries the rating of the issuer which is rated AAA by S&P as of June 30, 2004. The second principal protected equity linked note is a trust certificate issued by a securitized asset trust and contains specific financial instruments that do not include the Company’s common stock or debt. The trust is holding a forward contract to purchase shares of a Vanguard S&P 500 index mutual fund. This trust certificate matures on March 1, 2021 and was rated AAA by Fitch, Inc. as of June 30, 2004. Each of these notes has a related derivative contract that substitutes highly rated bonds in place of the trust certificates in the event of a significant market decline to provide principal protection for the investments. The notes derive their value from the underlying S&P 500 index mutual fund. The reduction in the market value of these two notes was the result of the decline in the S&P 500 index subsequent to the purchase dates of the notes. The S&P 500 index had a 3.44 percent return during the six months ending June 30, 2004 and an 18.1 percent return for the twelve months ending June 30, 2004. Based on historical long-term returns of the S&P 500 index, the Company believes that the value of the underlying S&P 500 index mutual fund will equate to or exceed the par value of the securities at maturity. The Company therefore believes that the decline in fair value of the notes is temporary. The Company has the ability to hold these securities to the earlier of recovery or maturity and intends to hold its fixed maturity investments until maturity to meet its liability obligations.

The fixed maturity bonds of the U.S. telecommunications company are securities issued by a full service provider of communications services. The reduction in market value of these securities was primarily due to the company’s rapid debt financed growth that resulted in a highly leveraged company following its acquisition of another communications services provider. The company, along with the majority of firms in the telecommunications sector, has been negatively impacted by excess capacity that resulted from the Telecommunications Act of 1996. This company has begun to make progress both operationally and financially over the last few months. S&P upgraded the company’s debt ratings three rating categories during the second quarter of 2004. It is expected that Moody’s Investors Service will also upgrade the debt rating. The company has very good liquidity with approximately $1.9 billion of available cash at March 31, 2004, and has manageable debt maturities. The company continues to pay down debt, lower its leverage ratio, and increase its interest coverage. The Company believes that the decline in fair value of these securities is temporary. The Company has the ability to hold these securities to the earlier of recovery or maturity and intends to hold its fixed maturity investments until maturity to meet its liability obligations.

The notes backed by aircraft leases are trust certificates issued by an owner trust which leases the aircraft to a major aircraft manufacturer, who then subleases the aircraft to two North American airlines. The value of the trust certificates is derived from the value of the underlying aircraft and the income from the lease payments. The reduction in market value was caused in large part by the deterioration of the airline industry and the associated decline in aircraft valuations subsequent to the purchase by the Company of the trust certificates. One of the two North American airlines is in bankruptcy, and its leases were renegotiated with the major aircraft manufacturer. The other airline has gone through financial restructuring and has shown significant improvement in credit quality in recent quarters. The Company evaluated the projected income stream from the leases with both airlines and believes the income will provide for full payout of the trust certificates prior to final maturity. The structure of the trust also includes an unused bank letter of credit that provides liquidity to fund three semi-annual interest payments as of June 30, 2004. The Company believes that the decline in fair value of these securities is temporary. The Company has the ability to hold these securities to the earlier of recovery or maturity and intends to hold its fixed maturity investments until maturity to meet its liability obligations.

The Company’s investment in mortgage-backed and asset-backed securities was approximately $3.7 billion and $4.0 billion on an amortized cost basis at June 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003. At June 30, 2004, the mortgage-backed securities had an average life of 6.0 years and effective duration of 6.4 years. The mortgage-backed securities are valued on a monthly basis using valuations supplied by the brokerage firms that are dealers in these securities. The primary risk involved in investing in mortgage-backed securities is the uncertainty of the timing of cash flows from the underlying loans due to prepayment of principal with the possibility of reinvesting the funds in a lower interest rate environment. The Company uses models which incorporate economic variables and possible future interest rate scenarios to predict future prepayment rates. The Company has not invested in mortgage-backed derivatives, such as interest-only, principal-only or residuals, where market values can be highly volatile relative to changes in interest rates.

The Company’s exposure to below-investment-grade fixed maturity securities at June 30, 2004, was $2,082.5 million, representing 6.6 percent of the fair value of invested assets excluding ceded policy loans. Below-investment-grade bonds are inherently more risky than investment-grade bonds since the risk of default by the issuer, by definition and as exhibited by bond rating, is higher. Also, the secondary market for certain below-investment-grade issues can be highly illiquid. The Company expects that additional downgrades of investment grade securities may occur during 2004, but the Company does not anticipate any liquidity problem caused by its investments in below-investment-grade securities, nor does it expect these investments to adversely affect its ability to hold its other investments to maturity.

The Company has a significant interest in, but is not the primary beneficiary of, a special purpose entity which is a collateralized bond obligation asset trust in which the Company holds interests in several of the tranches and for which the Company acts as investment manager of the underlying securities. The Company’s investment in this entity was reported at fair value with fixed maturity securities in the condensed consolidated statements of financial condition. The fair value of this investment was derived from the fair value of the underlying assets. The fair value and amortized cost of this investment was $28.4 million and $25.8 million, respectively, at June 30, 2004, and $27.0 million and $26.1 million, respectively, at December 31, 2003.

Mortgage Loans and Real Estate

The Company’s mortgage loan portfolio was $441.7 million and $474.7 million at June 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003, respectively. The mortgage loan portfolio continues to be well diversified geographically and among property types. The incidence of problem mortgage loans and foreclosure activity remains low, and management expects the level of delinquencies and problem loans to remain low in the future.

The Company had no impaired mortgage loans at June 30, 2004 or December 31, 2003. Impaired mortgage loans are not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s liquidity, financial position, or results of operations. The Company had no restructured mortgage loans at June 30, 2004. Restructured mortgage loans totaled $7.5 million at December 31, 2003, and represented loans that had been refinanced with terms more favorable to the borrower. Interest lost on restructured loans was immaterial for 2003.

The Company expects that during the remainder of 2004 it will invest in additional commercial mortgage loans either through the secondary market or through loan originations. This will allow the Company to leverage its operational structure currently in place for its existing mortgage loan portfolio and to utilize an additional investment category in its portfolio strategies.

Real estate was $26.3 million and $25.9 million at June 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003, respectively. Investment real estate is carried at cost less accumulated depreciation. Real estate acquired through foreclosure is valued at fair value at the date of foreclosure and may be classified as investment real estate if it meets the Company’s investment criteria. If investment real estate is determined to be permanently impaired, the carrying amount of the asset is reduced to fair value. Occasionally, investment real estate is reclassified to real estate held for sale when it no longer meets the Company’s investment criteria. Real estate held for sale, which is valued net of a valuation allowance that reduces the carrying value to the lower of cost or fair value less estimated cost to sell, amounted to $4.9 million at June 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003.

The Company uses a comprehensive rating system to evaluate the investment and credit risk of each mortgage loan and to identify specific properties for inspection and reevaluation. The Company establishes an investment valuation allowance for mortgage loans based on a review of individual loans and the overall loan portfolio, considering the value of the underlying collateral. Investment valuation allowances for real estate held for sale are established based on a review of specific assets. If a decline in value of a mortgage loan or real estate investment is considered to be other than temporary or if the asset is deemed permanently impaired, the investment is reduced to estimated net realizable value, and the reduction is recognized as a realized investment loss. Management monitors the risk associated with these invested asset portfolios and regularly reviews and adjusts the investment valuation allowance. At June 30, 2004, the balance in the valuation allowances for real estate was $9.3 million. No valuation allowance was held for mortgage loans at June 30, 2004.

Derivatives

Historically, the Company has utilized interest rate futures contracts, current and forward interest rate swaps, interest rate forward contracts, and options on forward interest rate swaps, forward treasuries, or forward contracts on specific fixed income securities to manage duration and increase yield on cash flows expected from current holdings and future premium income. Positions under the Company’s hedging programs for derivative activity that were open during the first six months of 2004 involved current and forward interest rate swaps, forward contracts on credit spreads on specific fixed income securities, and options on forward interest rate swaps. The Company also uses derivatives to manage currency risk of certain foreign currency denominated fixed income securities and, in conjunction with the sale of the Canadian branch, to hedge the anticipated foreign currency proceeds from the transaction. Positions under these programs that were open during the first six months included current and forward currency swaps and currency forward contracts.

All derivatives transactions are hedging in nature and not speculative, except for the embedded derivatives in modified coinsurance contracts recognized under DIG Issue B36. The derivatives recognized under DIG Issue B36 are not designated as hedging instruments, and the change in fair value is recognized as a realized investment gain or loss during the period of change. The Company recognized $75.3 million and $34.4 million, respectively, in net realized investment losses during the second quarter and first six months of 2004 due to the change in value of the embedded derivatives recognized under DIG Issue B36.

During the second quarter of 2004, the Company began utilizing a new hedging strategy of locking in a reinvestment rate floor for the reinvestment of cash flows from renewals on policies with a one to two year minimum premium rate guarantee. Positions under this hedging program involved the purchase of options on forward starting interest rate swaps.

Almost all hedging transactions are associated with the individual and group long-term care and the individual and group income protection product portfolios. All other product portfolios are periodically reviewed to determine if hedging strategies would be appropriate for risk management purposes.

During the second quarter of 2004 and 2003, the Company recognized net gains of $14.0 million and $26.4 million, respectively, on the termination of cash flow hedges and reported $13.9 million and $26.4 million, respectively, in other comprehensive income (loss). During the first six months of 2004 and 2003, the Company recognized net gains of $19.6 million and $35.6 million, respectively, on the termination of cash flow hedges and reported $19.5 million and $35.1 million, respectively, in other comprehensive income (loss). During the second quarter of 2004, the Company reported net gains of $0.1 million on the termination of cash flow hedges as a component of realized investment gains and losses. There were no realized investment gains and losses on the termination of cash flow hedges reported for the second quarter of 2003. During the first six months of 2004 and 2003, the Company reported net gains of $0.1 million and $0.5 million, respectively, on the termination of cash flow hedges as a component of realized investment gains and losses. The Company amortized $5.3 million of net deferred gains into net investment income during the second quarter of 2004 and $4.5 million during the second quarter of 2003. The Company amortized $10.3 million and $7.2 million of net deferred gains into net investment income during the first six months of 2004 and 2003, respectively.

The Company’s current credit exposure on derivatives, which is limited to the value of those contracts in a net gain position, was $92.5 million at June 30, 2004. Additions and terminations, in notional amounts, to the Company’s hedging programs during the second quarter of 2004 were $1,174.0 million and $267.2 million, respectively. These

additions and terminations include roll activity, which is the closing out of an old contract and initiation of a new one when a contract is about to mature but the need for it still exists. The notional amount of derivatives outstanding under the hedge programs was $4,895.2 million at June 30, 2004 and $4,001.2 million at December 31, 2003.

As of June 30, 2004 the Company had $729.1 million notional amount of open forward currency swaps to hedge fixed income Canadian dollar denominated securities the Company retained after the sale of the Canadian branch.

During 2003, the Company took advantage of the rise in interest rates and the steepening of the yield curve to hedge future period cash flows in the Company’s individual long-term care and individual income protection product lines. Approximately $2.8 billion of forward starting interest rate swaps (receive fixed) were executed at average expected yields in excess of 7.00%. These transactions produced a margin of 50 to 80 basis points above the Company’s reserve discount rates and lengthened the duration of the Company’s investment portfolio by approximately 0.5 years.

Non-current Investments

The Company’s exposure to non-current investments totaled $166.6 million at June 30, 2004, or 0.5 percent of invested assets excluding ceded policy loans, compared to $235.9 million at December 31, 2003. Non-current investments are those investments for which principal and/or interest payments are more than thirty days past due. At June 30, 2004 these investments, which are subject to the same review and monitoring procedures in place for other investments in determining when a decline in fair value is other than temporary, consisted of fixed maturity securities for which before-tax impairment losses of approximately $223.5 million had been recorded life-to-date. The amortized cost of these securities was $152.7 million. Approximately $142.3 million of these securities, on a fair value basis, had principal and/or interest payments past due for a period greater than one year.

Other

The Company has an investment program wherein it simultaneously enters into repurchase agreement transactions and reverse repurchase agreement transactions with the same party. The Company nets the related receivables and payables in the condensed consolidated statements of financial condition as these transactions meet the requirements for the right of offset. As of June 30, 2004, the Company had $660.6 million face value of these agreements in an open position that were offset. The Company also uses the repurchase agreement market as a source of short-term financing. The Company had no contracts for this purpose outstanding at June 30, 2004.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

The Company’s liquidity requirements are met primarily by cash flows provided from operations, principally in its insurance subsidiaries. Premium and investment income, as well as maturities and sales of invested assets, provide the primary sources of cash. Debt and/or securities offerings provide an additional source of liquidity. Cash is applied to the payment of policy benefits, costs of acquiring new business (principally commissions), operating expenses, and taxes, as well as purchases of new investments. The Company has established an investment strategy that management believes will provide for adequate cash flows from operations.

The Company’s policy benefits are primarily in the form of claim payments, and the Company therefore has minimal exposure to the policy withdrawal risk associated with deposit products such as individual life policies or annuities. The Company’s cash flows from operations could be negatively impacted by a decrease in demand for the Company’s insurance products or an increase in the incidence of new claims or the duration of existing claims. Cash flow could also be negatively impacted by a deterioration in the credit market whereby the Company’s ability to liquidate its positions in certain of its fixed maturity securities would be impacted such that the Company might not be able to dispose of these investments in a timely manner. The Company believes its cash resources are sufficient to meet its liquidity requirements for the next twelve months.

Consolidated Cash Flows

Operating Cash Flows

Net cash provided by operating activities was $420.2 million for the six months ended June 30 2004, compared to $452.3 million for the comparable period of 2003. During the first quarter of 2003, by mutual consent the Company amended existing reinsurance contracts with one of its reinsurers to transform the contracts from coinsurance to modified coinsurance arrangements. In conjunction with those amendments, the Company, as the assuming reinsurer, transferred to the ceding reinsurer cash equal to the statutory disabled life reserves of approximately $286.2 million and established a corresponding receivable. The ceding reinsurer will retain the assets backing the statutory disabled life reserves and will credit interest at a 7.00 percent effective annual rate to the Company. This 2003 cash disbursement is included in cash flows from operations. Excluding this transfer, cash flows from operations were $738.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2003.

Operating cash flows are primarily attributable to the receipt of premium and investment income, offset by payments of claims, commissions, expenses, and income taxes. Premium income growth is attributable not only to new sales, but to renewals of existing business, renewal price increases, and stable persistency. Investment income growth is due to the growth in the underlying assets supporting the Company’s insurance reserves, somewhat offset by a decline in portfolio yield rates. The growth in commissions and operating expenses is attributable primarily to new sales growth and the first year acquisition expenses associated with new business. The increase in paid claims is due partially to the continued growth and aging of the block of business and also to the general economy, as previously discussed in the operating results by segment.

Investing Cash Flows

Investing cash inflows consist primarily of the proceeds from the sales and maturities of investments. Investing cash outflows consist primarily of payments for purchases of investments. Net cash used in investing activities was $663.5 million compared to $1,289.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003, respectively. The Company generated $425.8 million less in proceeds from maturities of available-for-sale securities in 2004 than in 2003, primarily due to a decrease in principal prepayments on mortgage-backed securities and bond calls. The Company received $783.3 million less in proceeds from sales of available-for-sale securities during 2004 compared to 2003. In 2003, the Company’s sales and subsequent purchases were primarily related to the reduction and restructuring of its below-investment-grade portfolio.

During the first six months of 2004, the Company had cash inflows of $18.8 million in conjunction with the sale of its Japanese operations. No cash was exchanged in the second quarter disposition of the Canadian branch, but the Company transferred fixed maturity securities with a fair value and book value of approximately $1,099.4 million and $957.7 million, respectively, in conjunction with that transaction. While no cash was exchanged in the previously discussed first quarter of 2004 Swiss Life transaction, the Company assumed reserves of approximately $279.6 million and received fixed maturity securities of approximately $259.0 million and other miscellaneous assets of approximately $5.2 million, for a net purchase price of $15.4 million. During the first six months of 2003, the Company had cash inflows of $110.0 million related to the acquisition of Sun Life. The Company also received fixed maturity securities of approximately $118.4 million and other miscellaneous assets and liabilities of approximately $20.3 million and assumed reserves of approximately $285.9 million relative to the Sun Life acquisition, for a net purchase price of $37.2 million.

Financing Cash Flows

Financing cash flows consist primarily of borrowings and repayments of debt, issuance or repurchase of common stock, and dividends paid to stockholders. Net cash provided by financing activities was $239.1 million for the first six months of 2004 compared to $810.5 million provided for the same period in 2003. During the first six months of 2003, the Company reduced short-term debt $235.0 million by repayment of reverse repurchase agreements. Proceeds of $300.0 million were provided from the Company’s May 2004 sale of adjustable conversion-rate equity security units to a group of private investors. The Company’s combined offering in May 2003 provided $575.0 million in proceeds from the issuance of long-term debt, less underwriting discounts of $17.2 million, and $547.7 million in net proceeds from the issuance of common stock. See “Debt” as follows for further information.

Cash Available from Subsidiaries

The Company is dependent upon payments from its subsidiaries to pay dividends to its stockholders, to pay its debt obligations, and to pay its expenses. These payments by the Company’s insurance and non-insurance subsidiaries may take the form of interest payments on amounts loaned to such subsidiaries by the Company, operating and investment management fees, and/or dividends.

Restrictions under applicable state insurance laws limit the amount of ordinary dividends that can be paid to the Company from its insurance subsidiaries in any 12-month period without prior approval by regulatory authorities. For life insurance companies domiciled in the United States, that limitation equals, depending on the state of domicile, either ten percent of an insurer’s statutory surplus with respect to policyholders as of the preceding year end or the statutory net gain from operations, excluding realized investment gains and losses, of the preceding year. Pursuant to the 1999 merger of Unum and Provident, the Company was required to obtain approval from the Maine Bureau of Insurance (Maine Bureau) regarding payment of ordinary dividends from the Company’s Maine domiciled insurance subsidiary until July of 2004, which requirement has now ended. At the request of the Tennessee Department of Insurance (Tennessee Department), the Company will obtain approval from the Tennessee Department regarding payment of ordinary dividends to the Company from its Tennessee domiciled insurance subsidiaries.

The payment of ordinary dividends to the Company from its insurance subsidiaries is further limited to the amount of statutory surplus as it relates to policyholders. Based on the restrictions under current law, during 2004, $384.8 million is available for the payment of ordinary dividends to the Company from its domestic insurance subsidiaries. Of this amount, $95.7 million is conditional upon approval from the Tennessee Department.

The Company also has the ability to draw a dividend from its United Kingdom-based affiliate, Unum Limited. Such dividends are limited in amount, based on insurance company law in the United Kingdom, which requires a minimum solvency margin. Approximately $135.0 million will be available for the payment of dividends from Unum Limited during 2004.

Debt

At June 30, 2004, the Company had long-term debt totaling $3,089.0 million. At June 30, 2004, the debt to total capital ratio was 36.3 percent compared to 31.6 percent at December 31, 2003. The debt to total capital ratio, when calculated allowing 50 percent equity credit for the Company’s junior subordinated debt securities and 80 percent equity credit for the Company’s adjustable conversion-rate equity security units, was 26.3 percent compared to 24.7 percent at December 31, 2003.

In May 2004, the Company issued 12,000,000 8.25% adjustable conversion-rate equity security units (units) in a private offering. Each unit has a stated amount of $25 and will initially consist of (a) a contract pursuant to which the holder agrees to purchase, for $25, shares of the Company’s common stock on March 15, 2007 and (b) a 1/40 or 2.5% ownership interest in a senior note issued by the Company due May 15, 2009 with a principal amount of $1,000. Upon settlement of the common stock purchase contract and successful remarketing of the senior note element of the units, the Company will receive proceeds of approximately $300.0 million and will issue between 17.7 million and 20.4 million shares of common stock.

In May 2003, the Company issued 23,000,000 8.25% adjustable conversion-rate equity security units (units) in a public offering. Each unit has a stated amount of $25 and will initially consist of (a) a contract pursuant to which the holder agrees to purchase, for $25, shares of the Company’s common stock on May 15, 2006 and (b) a 1/40, or 2.5%, ownership interest in a senior note issued by the Company due May 15, 2008 with a principal amount of $1,000. Upon settlement of the common stock purchase contract and successful remarketing of the senior note element of the units, the Company will receive proceeds of approximately $575.0 million and will issue between 43.3 million and 52.9 million shares of common stock.

In the first quarter of 2001, the Company completed a long-term debt offering, issuing $575.0 million of 7.625% senior notes due March 1, 2011. In the second quarter of 2002, the Company completed two long-term offerings, issuing $250.0 million of 7.375% senior debentures due June 15, 2032 and $150.0 million of 7.250% public income

notes due June 15, 2032. The public income notes are redeemable at the Company’s option, in whole or in part, on or after June 25, 2007. Proceeds from the offerings were used to refinance existing commercial paper borrowings.

In 1998, the Company completed public offerings of $200.0 million of 7.25% senior notes due March 15, 2028, $200.0 million of 6.375% senior notes due July 15, 2005, $200.0 million of 7.0% senior notes due July 15, 2018, and $250.0 million of 6.75% senior notes due December 15, 2028.

In 1998, Provident Financing Trust I issued $300.0 million of 7.405% capital securities in a public offering. These capital securities, which mature on March 15, 2038, are fully and unconditionally guaranteed by the Company, have a liquidation value of $1,000 per capital security, and have a mandatory redemption feature under certain circumstances. The Company issued $300.0 million of 7.405% junior subordinated deferrable interest debentures, which mature on March 15, 2038, to Provident Financing Trust I in connection with the capital securities offering. The sole assets of Provident Financing Trust I are the junior subordinated debt securities.

Commitments

Contractual debt, junior subordinated debt securities, adjustable conversion-rate equity security units, and estimated lease commitments are as follows (in millions of dollars):


	Payments Due
	Total		In 1 Year or Less		After 1 Year up to 3 Years		After 3 Years up to 5 Years		After 5 Years
Long-term Debt	$	1,914.0	$	—	$	227.0	$	—	$	1,687.0
Adjustable Conversion-rate
Equity Security Units		875.0		—		—		875.0		—
Junior Subordinated Debt Securities		300.0		—		—		—		300.0
Operating Leases		99.6		26.9		42.3		22.1		8.3

Total	$	3,188.6	$	26.9	$	269.3	$	897.1	$	1,995.3

The Company has an agreement with an outside party wherein the Company is provided computer data processing services and related functions. Under the terms of the contract, the contract will expire in 2013, but the Company may cancel the agreement effective January 2006 or later upon payment of applicable cancellation charges. The aggregate noncancelable contractual obligation remaining under this agreement was $115.2 million at January 1, 2004, with no annual payment expected to exceed $53.4 million.

At June 30, 2004 the Company had capital commitments of $32.9 million to fund certain of its private placement fixed maturity securities. The funds are due upon satisfaction of contractual notice from the trustee or issuer. These amounts may or may not be funded during the term of the security.

Ratings

Standard & Poor’s Corporation (S&P), Moody’s Investors Service (Moody’s), Fitch, Inc. (Fitch), and A.M. Best Company (AM Best) are among the third parties that provide the Company assessments of its overall financial position. Ratings from these agencies for financial strength are available for the individual U.S. domiciled insurance company subsidiaries. Financial strength ratings are based primarily on U.S. statutory financial information for the individual U.S. domiciled insurance companies. Debt ratings for the Company are based primarily on consolidated financial information prepared using generally accepted accounting principles. Both financial strength ratings and debt ratings incorporate qualitative analyses by rating agencies on an ongoing basis. The Company competes based in part on the financial strength ratings provided by rating agencies. A downgrade of the Company’s financial

strength ratings can be expected to adversely affect the Company. A downgrade of the financial strength ratings could, among other things, adversely affect the Company’s relationships with distributors of its products and service and retention of its sales force, negatively impact persistency and new sales, particularly large case group sales and individual sales, and generally adversely affect the Company’s ability to compete. Downgrades in the Company’s debt ratings can be expected to adversely affect the Company’s ability to raise capital or its cost of capital.

In the first quarter of 2004, the ratings from Moody’s and Fitch were placed under review for a possible downgrade due to concerns expressed about the Company’s fourth quarter of 2003 reserve strengthening for group income protection and the profitability for this line of business. Management met with each rating agency during March and April of 2004 to respond to these concerns and outline the Company’s financial and business plans for 2004. In May 2004, AM Best reaffirmed its ratings for the Company, and Fitch reaffirmed all of the Company’s ratings but kept the ratings under review pending Fitch’s completion of an analysis of the Company’s reserves.

In May 2004, S&P downgraded the Company’s counterparty credit rating and senior debt rating to BB+ from BBB- while at the same time lowering the counterparty credit and financial strength ratings on the Company’s insurance company subsidiaries to BBB+ from A-, all with a “stable” outlook, citing concerns about the consistency of risk controls and valuation practices, which S&P believes have led to reserve charges and asset impairments in the past several quarters and have also contributed to marginal operating performance in the Company’s U.S. group income protection business. The outlook reflects the effects of strengthened capital adequacy, improved investment risk, and corrective measures taken by the Company to limit the downside on the closed block of individual income protection business and to improve profitability on its U.S. group income protection insurance. The change in the senior debt rating to BB+ represents a below-investment-grade rating.

Also in May 2004, Moody’s downgraded the Company’s senior debt credit ratings to Ba1 from Baa3 and the financial strength ratings on the Company’s insurance company subsidiaries to Baa1 from A3. The ratings outlook is “negative”. This action concluded the ratings review Moody’s initiated in February 2004. Moody’s indicated that the primary driver in the rating action was concern about the execution risk associated with the Company’s strategic plans to restore profitability to its core U.S. group long-term income protection business. Moody’s also noted that the Company had made considerable progress in improving its capital position throughout 2003. The change in the senior debt rating to Ba1 represents a below-investment-grade rating.

The Company is considering various measures aimed at minimizing the adverse effects of the downgrades, and such measures may increase the Company’s expenses. There can be no assurance that further downgrades by these or other ratings agencies, particularly in light of the S&P and Moody’s downgrades, will not occur.

The table below reflects, as of the date of this filing, the debt ratings for the Company and the financial strength ratings for the U.S. domiciled insurance company subsidiaries.


	S&P	Moody’s	Fitch	AM Best
UnumProvident Corporation
Senior Debt	BB+	Ba1 (Speculative)	BBB-(Good)	bbb-
U.S. Insurance Subsidiaries
Provident Life & Accident	BBB+ (Good)	Baa1 (Adequate)	A- (Strong)	A- (Excellent)
Provident Life & Casualty	Not Rated	Not Rated	Not Rated	A- (Excellent)
Unum Life of America	BBB+ (Good)	Baa1 (Adequate)	A- (Strong)	A- (Excellent)
First Unum Life	BBB+ (Good)	Baa1 (Adequate)	A- (Strong)	A- (Excellent)
Colonial Life & Accident	BBB+ (Good)	Baa1 (Adequate)	A- (Strong)	A- (Excellent)
Paul Revere Life	BBB+ (Good)	Baa1 (Adequate)	A- (Strong)	A- (Excellent)
Paul Revere Variable	BBB+ (Good)	Baa1 (Adequate)	A- (Strong)	A- (Excellent)

These ratings are not directed toward the holders of the Company’s securities and are not recommendations to buy, sell, or hold such securities. Each rating is subject to revision or withdrawal at any time by the assigning rating organization, and each rating should be evaluated independently of any other rating.

See “Risk Factors – Debt and Financial Strength Ratings” in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003, for further discussion.

Other Information

Pension and Postretirement Benefit Plans

The Company maintains separate U.S. and foreign pension plans and a U.S. post-retirement benefit plan. The U.S. pension plans comprise the majority of the total benefit obligation and pension expense for the Company. The value of the benefit obligations is determined based on a set of economic and demographic assumptions that represent the Company’s best estimate of future expected experience. These assumptions are reviewed annually. Two of the economic assumptions, the discount rate and the long-term rate of return, are adjusted accordingly based on key external indices. The assumptions chosen for U.S. pension plans and the U.S. postretirement plan use consistent methodology but reflect the differences in the plan obligations. The Company follows Statements of Financial Accounting Standards No. 87, Employer’s Accounting for Pensions (SFAS 87), No. 106, Employers’ Accounting for Postretirement Benefits Other Than Pensions (SFAS 106), and No. 132, Employers’ Disclosures about Pensions and Other Postretirement Benefits (SFAS 132) in its financial reporting and accounting for its pension and post-retirement benefit plans. See the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003, and Note 6 of the “Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements” contained herein in Item 1 for further information.

ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

The Company is subject to various market risk exposures including interest rate risk and foreign exchange rate risk. With respect to the Company’s exposure to market risk, see the discussion under “Investments” in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” contained herein in Item 2 and in Part II, Item 7A of Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003. During the first six months of 2004, there was no substantive change to the Company’s market risk or the management of such risk.

ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Disclosure Controls and Procedures

As of June 30, 2004, an evaluation was performed under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended). Based on their evaluation, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of June 30, 2004.

Internal Control over Financial Reporting

There have been no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) during the quarter ended June 30, 2004 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

PART II

ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

Refer to Part I, Item 1, Note 9 of the “Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements” for information on legal proceedings.

ITEM 2. CHANGES IN SECURITIES, USE OF PROCEEDS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

On May 11, 2004 the Company sold 12,000,000 8.25% Adjustable Conversion-Rate Equity Security Units (the Units) with a $300 million aggregate stated amount in a private placement to “qualified institutional buyers”, as such term is defined in Rule 144A under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the Securities Act), pursuant to a Subscription Agreement, dated as of May 6, 2004, a copy of which was filed with the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on May 7, 2004. The Units were sold for cash at a purchase price per Unit of $25.00 resulting in an aggregate offering price of $300 million. In connection with the private placement the Company paid a placement agent fee of $9 million. The Units were sold directly in a transaction exempt from registration under the Securities Act pursuant to Section 4(2) thereunder. Each Unit will initially consist of (A) a stock purchase contract that (i) requires the holder of the Unit to purchase on March 15, 2007 a number of shares of the Company’s common stock for $25, and (ii) entitles the holder to contract adjustment payments of 3.165% per annum, payable quarterly, commencing August 15, 2004, and (B) a 1/40 or 2.5% ownership interest in the Company’s senior notes due May 15, 2009, with a principal amount of $1,000, on which the Company will pay interest at the initial annual rate of 5.085%, such interest payable quarterly commencing August 15, 2004. Under the terms of the stock purchase contract, the settlement rate, subject to customary adjustment provisions, will be as follows: if the applicable market value of the Company’s common stock is equal to or greater than $16.95 per share, the settlement rate will be 1.4748 shares of common stock per purchase contract; if the applicable market value of the Company’s common stock is less than $16.95 per share but greater than $14.74 per share, the settlement rate will be equal to $25 divided by the applicable market value of the Company’s common stock per purchase contract; or if the applicable market value of the Company’s common stock is less than or equal to $14.74 per share, the settlement rate will be 1.6961 shares of common stock per purchase contract.

ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS

The Company held its Annual Meeting of Stockholders on May 13, 2004. The stockholders of the Company voted on six items at the Annual Meeting as set forth below:

1.	The election of four directors each to serve for a term expiring at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders in 2007.


Nominee	For	Withheld
Ronald E. Goldsberry	223,523,209	34,761,310
Hugh O. Maclellan, Jr.	225,212,059	33,072,460
C. William Pollard	219,369,123	38,915,396
John W. Rowe	219,348,948	38,935,571

Other Directors whose terms of office continued after the meeting are as follows:

William L. Armstrong *

Jon S. Fossel

A.S. (Pat) MacMillan, Jr.

Lawrence R. Pugh

Thomas R. Watjen

2.	The approval of the Management Incentive Compensation Plan of 2004.


For: 243,368,744		Against: 12,961,583		Abstain: 1,954,192		Broker Non-Vote: 0

3.	The approval of the Amended and Restated Employee Stock Purchase Plan.


For: 215,778,974		Against: 7,510,209		Abstain: 1,978,757		Broker Non-Vote: 33,016,579

4.	The ratification of the selection of Ernst & Young LLP as the Company’s independent auditor.


For: 252,891,943		Against: 3,903,323		Abstain: 1,489,253		Broker Non-Vote: 0

5.	The consideration and action on a stockholder proposal regarding election of directors by a majority instead of plurality vote.


For: 23,713,931		Against: 199,428,280		Abstain: 3,125,740		Broker Non-Vote: 32,016,568

6.	The consideration and action on a stockholder proposal to establish an office of the Board of Directors to enable direct communications on corporate governance matters.


For: 66,515,595		Against: 157,479,385		Abstain: 2,272,969		Broker Non-Vote: 32,016,570

*	Mr. Armstrong retired from the Board of Directors of the Company in June 2004.

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K

(a)	Index to Exhibits


Exhibit 3.2		Amended and Restated Bylaws of UnumProvident Corporation.

Exhibit 4.1		Subscription Agreement for the 12,000,000 Adjustable Conversion-Rate Equity Security Units (“Units”) dated as of May 6, 2004 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of the Company’s Form S-3 Registration Statement filed May 14, 2004).

Exhibit 4.2		Registration Rights Agreement for the Units dated as of May 11, 2004 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 of the Company’s Form S-3 Registration Statement filed May 14, 2004).

Exhibit 4.3		Fifth Supplemental Indenture between the Company and JPMorgan Chase Bank, as Trustee, dated as of May 11, 2004 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4 of the Company’s Form S-3 Registration Statement filed May 14, 2004).

Exhibit 4.4		Purchase Contract Agreement between the Company and JPMorgan Chase Bank as Purchase Contract Agent, dated as of May 11, 2004 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.5 of the Company’s Form S-3 Registration Statement filed May 14, 2004).

Exhibit 4.5		Pledge Agreement between the Company and BNY Midwest Trust Company, as Collateral Agent, Custodial Agent, and Securities Intermediary and JPMorgan Chase Bank, as Purchase Contract Agent, dated as of May 11, 2004 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.6 of the Company’s Form S-3 Registration Statement filed May 14, 2004).

Exhibit 15		Letter Re: Unaudited Interim Financial Information.

Exhibit 31.1		Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

Exhibit 31.2		Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

Exhibit 32.1		Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

Exhibit 32.2		Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

(b)	Reports on Form 8-K

Form 8-K furnished on May 6, 2004 containing the Company’s first quarter 2004 earnings press release and statistical supplement relating to its first quarter financial results. As part of the press release, the Company included a paragraph announcing its expectation to raise approximately $300 million of additional capital through the sale of adjustable conversion-rate equity security units to institutional investors in a private placement. Only such paragraph was deemed filed.

Form 8-K filed on May 7, 2004, announcing the signing of a subscription agreement for the private placement of $300 million adjustable conversion-rate equity security units to the private investors named therein.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.


		UnumProvident Corporation
		(Registrant)

Date: August 5, 2004		/s/ Thomas R. Watjen
		Thomas R. Watjen
		President and Chief Executive Officer

Date: August 5, 2004		/s/ Robert C. Greving
		Robert C. Greving
		Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer