Back to GetFilings.com

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

QUARTERLY REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF

THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For Quarter Ended June 30, 2004

Commission file number 0-13580

SUFFOLK BANCORP

(exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code) (631) 727-5667

NOT APPLICABLE

(former name, former address and former fiscal year if changed since last report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12-b2 of the Exchange Act). Yes x No ¨

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.

10,866,219 SHARES OF COMMON STOCK OUTSTANDING AS OF JULY 30, 2004

This page left blank intentionally.

Page 2

SUFFOLK BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES

Page 3

SUFFOLK BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CONDITION

(in thousands of dollars except for share and per share data)

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

Page 4

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME

(unaudited, in thousands of dollars except for share and per share data)

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

Page 5

SUFFOLK BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME

(in thousands of dollars except for share and per share data)

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

Page 6

SUFFOLK BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(in thousands of dollars)

Page 7

SUFFOLK BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(1) Basis of Presentation

In the opinion of management, the accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements of Suffolk Bancorp (Suffolk) and its consolidated subsidiaries have been prepared to reflect all adjustments (consisting solely of normally recurring accruals) necessary for a fair presentation of the financial condition and results of operations for the periods presented. Certain information and footnotes normally included in consolidated financial statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) have been condensed or omitted. Notwithstanding, management believes that the disclosures are adequate to prevent the information from misleading the reader, particularly when the accompanying consolidated financial statements are read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, for the year ended December 31, 2003.

The results of operations for the three months ended June 30, 2004 are not necessarily indicative of the results of operations to be expected for the remainder of the year.

(2) Stock-based Compensation

At June 30, 2004, Suffolk had one stock-based employee compensation plan. Suffolk accounts for that plan under the recognition and measurement principles of APB 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees,” and related interpretations. No stock-based employee compensation costs are reflected in net income, as all options granted under the plan had an exercise price equal to the market value of the underlying common stock on the date of grant.

The following table provides the disclosures required by Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123 “Accounting for Stock Based Compensation” (“SFAS No. 123”) and illustrates the effect on net income and earnings per share if Suffolk had applied the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS No. 123 to stock-based employee compensation, and should be read in conjunction with “Capital Resources” on Page 12 in Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

On March 31, 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued a proposed Statement, Share-Based Payment an Amendment of FASB Statements No. 123 and APB No. 95, that addresses the accounting for share-based payment transactions in which an enterprise receives employee services in exchange for (a) equity instruments of the enterprise or (b) liabilities that are based on the fair value of the enterprise’s equity instruments or that may be settled by the issuance of such equity instruments. Under the FASB’s proposal, all forms of share-based payments to employees, including employee stock options, would be treated the same as other forms of compensation by recognizing the related cost in the income statement. The expense of the award would generally be measured at fair value at the grant date. Current accounting guidance requires that the expense relating to so-called fixed plan employee stock options only be disclosed in the footnotes to the financial statements. The proposed Statement would eliminate the ability to account for share-based compensation transactions using APB Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees. The Company is currently evaluating this proposed statement and its effects on its results of operations.

(3) Recent Accounting Pronouncements

Suffolk adopted FASB Interpretation 45 (“FIN 45”), “Guarantor’s Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, including Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others,” on January 1, 2003. FIN 45 requires a guarantor entity, at the inception of a guarantee covered by the measurement provisions of the interpretation, to record a liability for the fair value of

Page 8

the obligation undertaken in issuing the guarantee. Suffolk has financial and performance letters of credit. Financial letters of credit require Suffolk to make payment if the customer’s financial condition deteriorates, as defined in the agreements. Performance letters of credit require Suffolk to make payments if the customer fails to perform certain non-financial contractual obligations. Suffolk previously did not record a liability when guaranteeing obligations unless it became probable that Suffolk would have to perform under the guarantee. FIN 45 applies prospectively to guarantees Suffolk issues or modifies subsequent to December 31, 2003. The maximum potential undiscounted amount of future payments of these letters of credit as of June 30, 2004 is $5,804,000 and they expire as follows:

Amounts due under these letters of credit would be reduced by any proceeds that Suffolk would be able to obtain in liquidating the collateral for the loans, which varies depending on the customer. The valuation of the allowance for loan losses includes a provision of $9,000 for possible loan losses based on the letters of credit outstanding on June 30, 2004.

In January 2003, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation 46 (“FIN 46”), “Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities.” FIN 46 clarifies the application of Accounting Research Bulletin 51, “Consolidated Financial Statements,” for certain entities that do not have sufficient equity at risk for the entity to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support from other parties or in which equity investors do not have the characteristics of a controlling financial interest (“variable interest entities”). Variable interest entities within the scope of FIN 46 will be required to be consolidated by their primary beneficiary. The primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity is determined to be the party that absorbs a majority of the entity’s expected losses, receives a majority of its expected returns, or both. Subsequent to the issuance of FIN 46, the FASB issued a revised interpretation, FIN 46(R), the provisions of which must be applied to certain variable interest entities by March 31, 2004. Suffolk implemented FIN 46(R) on January 1, 2004. The adoption of the provisions of FIN 46 did not materially impact its financial condition or results of operations.

The SEC recently released Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 105, “Application of Accounting Principles to Loan Commitments” (“SAB 105”). SAB 105 provides guidance about the measurement of loan commitments recognized at fair value under FASB Statement No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities. SAB 105 also requires companies to disclose their accounting policy for those loan commitments including methods and assumptions used to estimate fair value and associated hedging strategies. SAB 105 is effective for all loan commitments accounted for as derivatives that are entered into after March 31, 2004. The adoption of SAB 105 did not have a material effect on Suffolk’s consolidated financial statements.

Page 9

Item 2.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION

AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

For the Three-Month Periods ended June 30, 2004 and 2003

Net Income

Net income was $5,033,000 for the quarter, down 1.9 percent from $5,131,000 posted during the same period last year. Earnings per share were $0.46 for the second quarter of 2004 and 2003.

Interest Income

Interest income was $16,879,000 for the second quarter of 2004, down 5.3 percent from $17,829,000 posted for the same quarter in 2003. Average net loans during the second quarter of 2004 totaled $827,163,000 compared to $809,908,000 for the same period of 2003. During the second quarter of 2004, the yield was 5.47 percent (taxable-equivalent) on average earning assets of $1,241,680 down from 6.02 percent on average earning assets of $1,188,514 during the second quarter of 2003. Decreases in interest income were attributable primarily to a decrease in interest income on loans and a decrease in interest income on mortgage-backed securities.

Interest Expense

Interest expense for the second quarter of 2004 was $1,815,000, down 31.7 percent from $2,659,000 for the same period of 2003. During the second quarter of 2004, the cost of funds was .88 percent on average interest-bearing liabilities of $824,810,000 down from 1.28 percent on average interest-bearing liabilities of $833,603,000 during the second quarter of 2003. Interest expense decreased primarily as a result of decreases in market rates of interest, and as average demand deposits comprised 32.9 percent of total average deposits.

Each of the Bank’s demand deposit accounts has a related non-interest-bearing sweep account. The sole purpose of the sweep accounts is to reduce the non-interest-bearing reserve balances that the Bank is required to maintain with the Federal Reserve Bank, and thereby increase funds available for investment. Although the sweep accounts are classified as savings accounts for regulatory purposes, they are included in demand deposits in the accompanying consolidated statements of condition.

Net Interest Income

Net interest income, before the provision for possible loan losses, is the largest component of Suffolk’s earnings. It was $15,064,000 for the second quarter of 2004, down .7 percent from $15,170,000 during the same period of 2003. The net interest margin for the quarter, on a fully taxable-equivalent basis, was 4.89 percent compared to 5.13 percent for the same period of 2003.

Page 10

The following table details the components of Suffolk’s net interest income on a taxable-equivalent basis: (in thousands of dollars)

Other Income

Other income increased to $3,774,000 for the three months compared to $2,748,000 the previous year. Service charges on deposits were down 4.6 percent. Service charges, including commissions and fees other than for deposits, increased by 5.9 percent. Trust revenue was up 8.8 percent. There was a repositioning of the securities portfolio to take advantage of a steeper yield curve. Suffolk sold securities of shorter remaining maturities and reinvested the proceeds in securities with longer maturities, resulting in a pre-tax net securities gain of $1,219,000. Other operating income decreased by 50.3 percent.

Page 11

Other Expense

Other expense for the second quarter of 2004 was $9,191,000, up .6 percent from $9,133,000 for the comparable period in 2003. Employee compensation remained flat, net occupancy expense increased 11.3 percent, equipment expense increased by 4.7 percent, and other operating expense decreased by 2.0 percent.

In accordance with the requirements of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards 132R (“SFAS 132R”), Suffolk presents information concerning net periodic defined benefit pension expense for the three months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003, including the following components:

A contribution of approximately $1,064,000 was made to the pension plan in June of 2004. Management is currently evaluating the impact of the Pension Funding Equity Act enacted in April 2004 on projected funding. There were no other contributions required to be made to the plan in the three months ended June 30, 2004.

Capital Resources

Stockholders’ equity totaled $99,638,000 on June 30, 2004, a decrease of .5 percent from $100,170,000 on December 31, 2003. The ratio of equity to assets was 7.0 percent at June 30, 2004 and 7.5 percent at December 31, 2003. The following table details amounts and ratios of Suffolk’s regulatory capital: (in thousands of dollars except ratios)

Credit Risk

Suffolk makes loans based on the best evaluation possible of the creditworthiness of the borrower. Even with careful underwriting, some loans may not be repaid as originally agreed. To provide for this possibility, Suffolk maintains an allowance for possible loan losses, based on an analysis of the performance of the loans in its portfolio. The analysis includes subjective factors based on management’s judgment as well as quantitative evaluation. Prudent, conservative estimates should produce an allowance that will provide for a range of losses. According to GAAP, a financial institution should record its best estimate. Appropriate factors contributing to the estimate may include changes in the composition of the institution’s assets, or potential economic slowdowns or downturns. Also important is the geographical or political environment in which the institution operates. Suffolk’s management considers all of these factors when determining the provision for possible loan losses.

Page 12

During the quarter, there was a provision for the allowance for possible loan and lease losses of $1,298,000 for the quarter in comparison to $270,000 in the same period last year. This provision was occasioned by the deterioration of a single credit, the circumstances of which are particular to that loan. Management does not believe that it is reflective of systemic weakness in Suffolk’s loan portfolio or of its underwriting standards and procedures

The following table presents information about the allowance for possible loan losses: (in thousands of dollars except for ratios)