Back to GetFilings.com

Table of Contents

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D. C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 2004

FOR THE TRANSITION PERIOD FROM                      to                     

COMMISSION FILE NUMBER: 000-50129

HUDSON HIGHLAND GROUP, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

622 Third Avenue, New York, New York 10017

(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip code)

(212) 351-7300

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

Yes x No. ¨

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s class of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.

Table of Contents

HUDSON HIGHLAND GROUP, INC.

INDEX

Table of Contents

PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION

HUDSON HIGHLAND GROUP, INC.

CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(in thousands, except per share amounts)

(unaudited)

See accompanying notes to consolidated condensed financial statements.

- 3 -

Table of Contents

HUDSON HIGHLAND GROUP, INC.

CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS

(in thousands, except per share amounts)

See accompanying notes to consolidated condensed financial statements.

- 4 -

Table of Contents

HUDSON HIGHLAND GROUP, INC.

CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(in thousands)

(unaudited)

See accompanying notes to consolidated condensed financial statements.

- 5 -

Table of Contents

HUDSON HIGHLAND GROUP, INC.

CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

(in thousands, except share amounts)

(unaudited)

See accompanying notes to consolidated condensed financial statements.

- 6 -

Table of Contents

HUDSON HIGHLAND GROUP, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(in thousands, except share and per share amounts)

(unaudited)

NOTE 1 - INTERIM CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED QUARTERLY FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

These interim consolidated condensed quarterly financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) and should be read in conjunction with the consolidated audited financial statements and related notes of Hudson Highland Group, Inc. (the “Company”) in its Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on March 10, 2004 (the “Form 10-K”). The consolidated results for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of results for the full year or any subsequent period. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for a fair presentation of financial position, results of operations and cash flows at the dates and for the periods presented have been included.

NOTE 2 – BASIS OF PRESENTATION AND DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS

Basis of Presentation

The Company was historically the combination of 67 acquisitions made between 1999 and 2002, which became the eResourcing and Executive Search divisions (“HH Group”) of Monster Worldwide, Inc. (“Monster”), formerly TMP Worldwide, Inc. Some of the Company’s constituent businesses have operated for more than 20 years. On March 31, 2003 (the “Distribution Date”), Monster distributed all of the outstanding shares of the newly named HH Group to its stockholders of record on March 14, 2003 on a basis of one share of HH Group common stock for each thirteen and one-third shares of Monster common stock so held. Since the Distribution Date, the Company has operated as an independent publicly held company, has added two small acquisitions, and reorganized a number of smaller business units after determining that those businesses were not viable profit centers.

For all periods through the Distribution Date, the consolidated financial statements have been derived from the financial statements and accounting records of Monster, using the historical results of operations and historical basis of the assets and liabilities of the Company’s business. In connection with the Distribution, the inter-company balances due to Monster were contributed by Monster to equity; accordingly, such balances are reflected as divisional equity for periods prior to the Distribution Date, at which time the amount was reclassified to common stock and additional paid-in capital. Earnings and losses are accumulated in retained earnings (deficit) starting April 1, 2003. The terms of the distribution agreement with Monster did not require repayment or distribution of any portion of the divisional equity back to Monster. HH Group’s costs and expenses in the accompanying consolidated condensed financial statements for periods prior to the Distribution Date include allocations from Monster for executive, legal, accounting, treasury, real estate, information technology and other Monster corporate services and infrastructure costs because specific identification of the expenses is not practicable. The total corporate services allocation to HH Group from Monster was $5,123 for the period ending the Distribution Date. The expense allocations were determined on the basis that Monster and HH Group considered to be reasonable reflections of the utilization of services provided or the benefit received by HH Group using ratios that are primarily based on the Company’s revenue, net of direct costs of temporary contractors, compared to Monster as a whole. Monster also allocated to HH Group’s corporate expense certain business reorganization expenses of $137 for the period ending March 31, 2003. The financial information included herein prior to the Distribution Date may not necessarily reflect the financial position and results of operations of the Company in the future or what these amounts would have been had the Company been a separate, stand-alone entity during the periods presented prior to the Distribution.

Income (Loss) Per Share

To determine the shares outstanding for the Company for the period prior to the Distribution, Monster’s weighted average number of shares is multiplied by the distribution ratio of one share of HH Group common stock for every thirteen and one-third shares of Monster common stock. Basic income (loss) per share is computed by dividing the Company’s income (loss) by the weighted average number of shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings (loss) per share reflect the potential dilution from the assumed exercise of all dilutive potential common shares, primarily stock options. The dilutive impact of stock options is determined by applying the “treasury stock” method. For the six-month period ended June 30, 2004, the effect of approximately 485,000 outstanding stock options and other common stock equivalents was excluded from the calculation of diluted loss per share because the effect was anti-dilutive. For the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2003, the effect of approximately 286,000 outstanding stock options and other common stock equivalents was excluded from the calculation of diluted loss per share because the effect was anti-dilutive.

- 7 -

Table of Contents

NOTE 2 – BASIS OF PRESENTATION AND DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS (Continued)

Description of Business Segments

The Company is one of the world’s largest specialized staffing and executive search firms. The Company provides professional staffing services on a permanent, contract and temporary basis, as well as executive search and a range of human capital services to businesses operating in a wide variety of industries. The Company is organized into two business segments, Hudson Global Resources (“Hudson”) and Highland Partners (“Highland”), which constituted approximately 87% and 13% of the Company’s gross margin, respectively, for the six months ended June 30, 2004.

Hudson. Hudson primarily provides temporary and contract personnel and permanent recruitment services to a wide range of clients. With respect to temporary and contract personnel, Hudson focuses on providing candidates with professional qualifications, including accounting and finance, legal and technology. The length of temporary assignment can vary widely, but assignments in the professional sectors tend to be longer than those in the general clerical or industrial sectors. With respect to permanent recruitment, Hudson focuses on mid-level professionals typically earning between $50,000 and $150,000 annually and possessing the professional skills and/or profile required by clients. Hudson provides permanent recruitment services on both a retained and contingent basis. In larger markets, Hudson’s sales strategy focuses on both clients operating in particular business segments, such as financial services, healthcare, or technology, and candidates possessing particular professional qualifications, such as accounting and finance, information technology and communications, legal and healthcare. Hudson uses both traditional and interactive methods to select potential candidates for its clients, employing a suite of products that assesses talent and helps predict whether a candidate will be successful in a given role.

Hudson also provides a variety of other services through its Human Capital Solutions and Hudson Inclusion Solutions units that encompass services including, among others, customized interactive recruiting and human resource solutions, executive assessment and coaching, diversity assessment and consulting, organizational effectiveness, and career transition. Through the Hudson Highland Center for High Performance, Hudson also offers leadership solutions designed to assist senior management in enhancing the operating performance of large organizations. These services enable Hudson to offer clients a comprehensive set of human capital management services, ranging from providing temporary workers, to assessment or coaching of permanent staff, to recruitment or search for permanent executives and professionals, to outplacement.

Hudson operates on a global basis in 21 countries and approximately 100 offices with its revenue generated approximately evenly among North America, Europe (including the United Kingdom), and the Asia Pacific region (primarily Australia and New Zealand).

Highland. Highland offers a comprehensive range of executive search services on a retained basis aimed at recruiting senior level executives or professionals. Highland also has an active practice in assisting clients desiring to augment their boards of directors.

Highland approaches the market through industry sectors, such as financial services, life sciences, retail and consumer products, industrial and technology. This industry sector sales approach is designed to enable Highland to better understand the market conditions and strategic management issues faced by clients within their specific business sectors. Highland also recruits candidates through functional specialist groups, including board of directors, chief financial officer, chief information officer, human resources and legal. These functional expertise groups are comprised of consultants who have extensive backgrounds in placing executives in certain specialist positions within a business.

Highland operates as a global boutique with 16 practice offices in five countries. For the six months ended June 30, 2004, approximately 69% of revenue in the Highland business was derived in North America.

Corporate expenses are reported separately from the two operating segments and consist primarily of compensation, marketing and lease expense, and professional fees.

Reclassifications

Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to the Company’s 2004 financial statement presentation; these reclassifications do not change total revenues, total expenses, net loss, total assets, total liabilities or stockholders’ equity.

- 8 -

Table of Contents

NOTE 3 – STOCK BASED COMPENSATION

The Company accounts for employee stock-based compensation in accordance with APB No. 25 “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees” (“APB No. 25”). Under APB No. 25, no compensation expense is recognized in connection with the awarding of stock option grants to employees provided that, as of the grant date, all terms associated with the award are fixed and the quoted market price of the stock is equal to or less than the amount an employee must pay to acquire the stock. Because the Company issues only fixed term stock option grants at or above the quoted market price on the date of the grant, there is no related compensation expense recognized in the accompanying financial statements. The Company adopted the disclosure only provisions of SFAS 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation” (“SFAS 123”) and SFAS 148 “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation – Transition and Disclosure” (“SFAS 148”), which require certain financial statement disclosures, including pro forma operating results as if the Company had prepared its consolidated financial statements in accordance with the fair value based method of accounting for stock-based compensation.

The Black-Scholes option-pricing model was developed for use in estimating the fair value of traded options that have no restrictions and are fully transferable and negotiable in a free trading market. Black-Scholes does not consider the employment, transfer or vesting restrictions that are inherent in the Company’s employee options. Use of an option valuation model, as required by SFAS 123, includes highly subjective assumptions based on long-term predictions, including the expected stock price volatility and average life of each option grant. Because the Company’s employee options have characteristics significantly different from those of freely traded options, and because changes in the subjective input assumptions can materially affect the Company’s estimate of the fair value of those options, in the Company’s opinion the existing valuation models, including Black-Scholes, are not reliable single measures and may misstate the fair value of the Company’s employee options.

As required under SFAS 123 and SFAS 148, the pro forma effects of stock-based compensation on the Company’s operating results and per share data have been estimated at the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model based on the following weighted average assumptions:

For purposes of pro forma disclosures, the options’ estimated fair value is assumed to be amortized to expense over the options’ vesting periods. The pro forma effects of stock-based compensation expense for the six months ended June 30, 2003 does not include expenses from the period prior to the Distribution Date, as no options related to the Company’s stock were outstanding during that period and no expense was required for Monster stock options granted to the Company’s employees prior to the Distribution Date. As a result of the Company’s inability to recognize current tax benefits on reported net losses, total stock-based compensation expense is shown without tax benefits for all periods presented. The pro forma effects of recognizing compensation expense under the fair value method on the Company’s operating results and per share data are as follows:

- 9 -

Table of Contents

NOTE 4 - REVENUES, DIRECT COSTS AND GROSS MARGIN

The Company’s revenue and direct costs, classified by temporary and permanent placement business, are as follows:

NOTE 5 - BUSINESS REORGANIZATION EXPENSES

In 2002, the Company, as part of Monster, announced reorganization initiatives to streamline operations, lower its cost structure, integrate businesses previously acquired and improve return on capital. These reorganization programs included a workforce reduction, consolidation of excess facilities, restructuring of certain business functions and other special charges, primarily for exiting activities that were no longer part of the Company’s strategic plan. The Company also initiated reorganization efforts related to its separation from Monster, which consisted primarily of workforce reduction, office consolidation costs and related write-offs, professional fees and other special charges.

In 2003, the Company recorded additional charges and credits, as a result of changes in estimates related to the prior actions, and as a result of further actions in 2003 to close offices and business units that did not have the size or market capacity to provide future income growth.

Amounts in the “Change in estimate” column of the following tables represent amounts charged to business reorganization expenses in the Company’s statement of operations for the six months ended June 30, 2004. Costs and (recoveries) under these plans are charged (credited) to expense as estimates are finalized and events become accruable and represent modifications to previously accrued amounts that were initially established under each plan. The “Utilization” caption of the following tables is primarily the cash payments associated with the plans.

A summary of activity of the business reorganization expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2004 is as follows:

A summary of plan activity related to business reorganization expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2004 is as follows:

- 10 -

Table of Contents

NOTE 6 - BUSINESS COMBINATIONS

Acquisitions Accounted for Using the Purchase Method

In June 2004, the Company purchased one business through the issuance of 183,587 shares of common stock, with a fair value of $5,248. The Company recorded the preliminary allocation of the purchase price to the estimated fair value of the net assets acquired ($964 in assets, $562 in liabilities and $317 as a reduction of equity, which relates to a receivable due from sellers) with the excess of $4,529 allocated to goodwill. The purchase agreement provides for contingent payouts to the sellers over the next three years, based upon future minimum annual and cumulative earnings thresholds. If and when such payments come due, the amounts will be added to the recorded value of goodwill. There were no acquisitions during the six months ended June 30, 2003.

Accrued Merger and Integration Expenses

Pursuant to the conclusions stated in EITF 94-3 and EITF Issue No. 95-3, Recognition of Liabilities in Connection with a Purchase Business Combination, and in connection with the acquisitions and mergers made in 2001 and 2000, the Company formulated plans to integrate the operations of such companies. These plans involve the closure of certain offices of the acquired and merged companies and the termination of certain management and employees. The objectives of the plans are to eliminate redundant facilities and personnel and to create a single brand in the related markets in which the Company operates.

In connection with plans relating to pooled entities, the Company recovered $37 and expensed $978 in the first six months of 2004 and 2003, respectively, relating to integration activities included as a component of merger and integration expenses. Amounts recorded relating to business combinations accounted for as purchases were charged to goodwill. The $37 in recoveries for the first six months of 2004 was entirely related to lease obligations on closed facilities.

Amounts reflected in the “Change in estimate” column represent modifications to plans subsequent to finalization and have been (recovered) expensed in the current period. The “Utilization” caption of the following tables is primarily the cash payments associated with the plans.

A summary of activity of the merger and integration expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2004 is as follows:

A summary of plan activity related to merger and integration expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2004 is as follows:

NOTE 7 - TAXES

The provision for income taxes for the six months ended June 30, 2004 was $721 on a pretax loss of $17,770, compared with a provision of $6,138 on a pretax loss of $52,963 for the same period of 2003. The higher tax provision in the first six months of 2003 relates primarily to the increase in valuation allowances on certain foreign tax losses, which may not be realizable. In each period, the effective tax rate differs from the U.S. Federal statutory rate of 35% due primarily to valuation allowances on deferred tax assets, net operating losses retained or utilized by Monster, certain non-deductible expenses such as amortization, business restructuring and spin off costs, merger costs from pooling of interests transactions, and variations from the U.S. tax rate in foreign jurisdictions. The Company records a valuation allowance against deferred tax assets to the extent that it is more likely than not that some portion, or all of, the deferred tax assets will not be realized.

- 11 -

Table of Contents

NOTE 8 – RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

Distribution Business Agreements

In connection with the Distribution, the Company and Monster entered into agreements covering employee benefit plans, real estate, transition services and tax separation.

The Company entered into a distribution agreement with Monster effective as of the Distribution Date, pursuant to which the Company, among other things, agreed to maintain independent employee benefit plans and programs (other than equity compensation) that are substantially similar to Monster’s existing employee benefit plans and programs. Following the Distribution, Monster generally ceased to have any liability to the Company’s current and former employees and their beneficiaries including liability under any of Monster’s benefit plans or programs.

The Company and Monster entered into various lease and sublease arrangements for the sharing of certain facilities for a transitional period on commercial terms. In the case of subleases or sub-subleases of property, the lease terms and conditions generally coincide with the remaining terms and conditions of the primary lease or sublease, respectively.

The Company entered into a transition services agreement with Monster effective as of the Distribution Date. Under the agreement, Monster provides to the Company, and the Company provides to Monster, certain insurance, tax, legal, facilities, human resources, information technology and other services that are required for a limited time (generally for one year following the Distribution Date, except as otherwise agreed).

After the Distribution Date, the Company was no longer included in Monster’s consolidated group for United States federal income tax purposes. The Company and Monster entered into a tax separation agreement to reflect the Company’s separation from Monster with respect to tax matters. The primary purpose of the tax separation agreement is to reflect each party’s rights and obligations relating to payments and refunds of taxes that are attributable to periods beginning before and including the date of the distribution and any taxes resulting from transactions effected in connection with the distribution.

Monster Funding of HH Group Obligations

Monster agreed at the Distribution Date to reimburse the Company for $13,530 of cash payments related to the Company’s accrued integration, restructuring and business reorganization obligations and other expenses during the first year following the spin-off. The Company received payments of $13,530 since the Distribution. Legal obligation for settlement of such liabilities will remain with the Company.

Other Commercial Arrangements

The Company and Monster have entered into a three-year commercial contract involving the utilization of Monster.com services for targeting, sourcing, screening and tracking prospective job candidates around the world. The Company and Monster may from time to time also negotiate and purchase other services from the other, pursuant to customary terms and conditions. There is no contractual commitment that requires the Company to use Monster services in preference to other competitors.

NOTE 9 - COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Risks and Uncertainties

The Company has a history of operating losses and has only operated as an independent company since the Distribution Date. Prior to the Distribution Date, the Company’s operations were historically financed by Monster as separate segments of Monster’s broader corporate organization rather than as a separate stand-alone company. Monster assisted the Company by providing financing, particularly for acquisitions, as well as providing corporate functions such as identifying and negotiating acquisitions, legal and tax functions. Following the Distribution, Monster has no obligation to provide assistance to the Company other than the interim and transitional services, that will be provided by Monster pursuant to the transition services agreement described in Note 8. Because the Company’s businesses have operated as an independent company only since the Distribution Date, the Company cannot provide assurance that it will be able to successfully implement the changes necessary to operate as a profitable stand-alone business, or to secure additional debt or equity financing on terms that are acceptable to the Company.

- 12 -

Table of Contents

NOTE 10 - FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

The Company received $27,919 in net proceeds from the issuance of 1,273,885 shares of its common stock in a registered public offering on March 23, 2004.

Credit Facility

The Company has a senior secured credit facility for $50,000 with Wells Fargo Foothill, Inc., as agent, and certain lenders (the “Foothill Credit Facility”). The maturity date of the Foothill Credit Facility is March 31, 2007. Outstanding loans will bear interest equal to the prime rate plus 0.25% or LIBOR plus 2.00%, at the Company’s option. The Foothill Credit Facility is secured by substantially all of the assets of the Company and extensions of credit will be based on a percentage of the accounts receivable of the Company. The Company expects to use such credit, if and when required, to support its ongoing working capital requirements, capital expenditures and other corporate purposes and to support letters of credit. As of June 30, 2004 the credit limit on the Foothill Credit Facility was $30,000, pending Wells Fargo Foothill’s syndication of a portion of the facility. Effective July 27, 2004, the Foothill Credit Facility was increased by $20,000 as a result of a successful syndication. During the six months ended June 30, 2004, the Company borrowed and repaid a total of $13,550 under this credit facility. As of June 30, 2004, no borrowings were outstanding and the Company had letters of credit issued and outstanding of $9,262, leaving $20,738 of the credit facility available for use.

The Foothill Credit Facility contains various restrictions and covenants, including (1) prohibitions on payments of dividends and repurchases of the Company’s stock; (2) requirements that the Company maintain its Adjusted EBITDA and capital expenditures within prescribed levels; (3) restrictions on the ability of the Company to make additional borrowings, or to consolidate, merge or otherwise fundamentally change the ownership of the Company; and (4) limitations on investments, dispositions of assets and guarantees of indebtedness. These restrictions and covenants could limit the Company’s ability to respond to market conditions, to provide for unanticipated capital investments, to raise additional debt or equity capital, to pay dividends or to take advantage of business opportunities, including future acquisitions. On July 27, 2004, the Company entered into an amendment to the Foothill Credit Facility that approved the Company’s updated plan for consolidation of certain of its subsidiaries, clarified the basis for establishing the Company’s Adjusted EBITDA covenant for the Company’s fiscal year 2005 and thereafter, joined certain subsidiaries of the Company as parties to the Foothill Credit Facility, and made certain other changes.

Derivatives Held for Purposes Other Than Trading

The Company periodically enters into forward contracts in order to reduce exposure to exchange rate risk related to short-term intercompany loans denominated in currencies other than the functional currency. The fair values for all derivatives are recorded in other assets or other liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets. The Company had no outstanding derivatives as of June 30, 2004.

NOTE 11 - COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

NOTE 12 - SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW INFORMATION

During the six month period ended June 30, 2004, the Company issued 183,587 shares of common stock, with a fair value of $5,248 to purchase a business in its Hudson segment. The Company also issued 46,083 shares of its common stock with a value of $1,058 to satisfy the 2003 contribution liability to the 401(k) Savings Plan. The Company entered into capital lease obligations for furniture and fixtures and telecommunications equipment with a fair value of $3,920, of which $3,767 was related to a renegotiation of an existing operating lease that upon initiation of the new lease was converted to a capital lease.

- 13 -

Table of Contents

NOTE 13 - SEGMENT AND GEOGRAPHIC DATA

The Company operates in two business segments: Hudson and Highland. The Company conducts operations in the following geographic regions: North America, the Asia/Pacific Region (primarily Australia), the United Kingdom and Continental Europe.

Segment information is presented in accordance with SFAS No. 131, Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information. This standard is based on a management approach that requires segmentation based upon the Company’s internal organization and disclosure of revenue and operating income based upon internal accounting methods. The Company’s financial reporting systems present various data for management to run the business, including internal profit and loss statements prepared on a basis not consistent with generally accepted accounting principles. Assets are not allocated to segments for internal reporting purposes.