Back to GetFilings.com

Table of Contents

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D. C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2004

or

For the transition period from             to             

Commission File Number: 1-11917

FBL Financial Group, Inc.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

(515) 225-5400

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.  x    Yes  ¨    No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).  x    Yes  ¨    No

APPLICABLE ONLY TO CORPORATE ISSUERS:

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date: 27,467,384 shares of Class A common stock and 1,192,990 shares of Class B common stock as of July 30, 2004.

Table of Contents

FBL FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.

FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 2004

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1

Table of Contents

ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

FBL FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (Unaudited)

(Dollars in thousands)

2

Table of Contents

FBL FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (Continued)

(Dollars in thousands)

See accompanying notes.

3

Table of Contents

FBL FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME (Unaudited)

(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)

See accompanying notes.

4

Table of Contents

FBL FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (Unaudited)

(Dollars in thousands)

Comprehensive income (loss) totaled ($91.9) million in the second quarter of 2004 and $63.8 million in the second quarter of 2003.

See accompanying notes.

5

Table of Contents

FBL FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (Unaudited)

(Dollars in thousands)

6

Table of Contents

FBL FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (Continued)

(Dollars in thousands)

See accompanying notes.

7

Table of Contents

FBL FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)

June 30, 2004

1. Significant Accounting Policies

Basis of Presentation

The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements of FBL Financial Group, Inc. (we or the Company) have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (GAAP) for interim financial information and the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and notes required by GAAP for complete financial statements. Our financial statements include all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) necessary for a fair presentation of our financial position and results of operations. Operating results for the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2004 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2004. We encourage you to refer to our consolidated financial statements and notes for the year ended December 31, 2003 included in our annual report on Form 10-K for a complete description of our material accounting policies. Also included in the Form 10-K is a description of areas of judgements and estimates and other information necessary to understand our financial position and results of operations.

Accounting Changes

Effective January 1, 2004, we adopted Statement of Position (SOP) 03-1, “Accounting and Reporting by Insurance Enterprises for Certain Nontraditional Long-Duration Contracts and for Separate Accounts,” issued by the Accounting Standards Executive Committee of the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. The SOP provides guidance on separate account presentation and valuation, the accounting for sales inducements (including premium bonuses and bonus interest) and the classification and valuation of long-duration contract liabilities. To comply with this SOP, we changed our method of computing reserves for guaranteed minimum death benefits (GMDB) and incremental death benefits (IDB) associated with our variable annuities and changed our presentation of deferred expenses relating to sales inducements.

Variable annuity and variable universal life contracts are the only contracts reported in our separate accounts. These contracts generally do not have any minimum guarantees other than minimum interest guarantees on funds deposited in our general account and GMDBs on our variable annuities. In addition, certain variable annuity contracts have an IDB rider that pays the contract holder a percentage of the gain on the contract. Information regarding our GMDBs and IDBs by type of guarantee and related separate account balance and net amount at risk (amount by which GMDB or IDB exceeds account value) is as follows:

The separate account assets are principally comprised of stock and bond mutual funds. The reserve for GMDBs and IDBs at June 30, 2004, determined using scenario-based modeling techniques and industry mortality assumptions, totaled $0.4 million and the reserve at December 31, 2003 totaled $0.8 million. The weighted average age of the contract holders with a GMDB or IDB rider was 56 years at June 30, 2004 and 55 years at December 31, 2003. Incurred benefits for GMDBs and IDBs for the second quarter totaled ($0.1) million for 2004 and less than $0.1 million for 2003 and for the six months ended June 30 totaled ($0.2) million for 2004, excluding the impact of the

8

Table of Contents

adoption of SOP 03-1, and less than $0.1 million for 2003. Paid benefits for GMDBs and IDBs totaled less than $0.1 million for the second quarter and the six-month periods of 2004 and $0.1 million for the second quarter and six-month periods of 2003. The adoption of SOP 03-1 provisions relating to GMDBs and IDBs resulted in no change to net income for the second quarter of 2004 and an increase to net income of less than $0.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2004 (less than $0.01 per common share – basic and diluted).

Certain of our annuity contracts contain either a premium bonus credited to the contract holder’s account balance or a bonus interest crediting rate which applies to the first contract year only. These sales inducements are deferred and amortized over the expected life of the contracts based on the emergence of gross profits. Sales inducements deferred in the second quarter totaled $15.7 million in 2004 and $5.5 million in 2003 and amounts amortized totaled $1.3 million in 2004 and $0.9 million in 2003. Sales inducements deferred in the six-month period totaled $19.6 million in 2004 and $9.6 million in 2003 and amounts amortized totaled $2.8 million in 2004 and $1.8 million in 2003. The unamortized sales inducement balance totaled $59.4 million at June 30, 2004 and $39.1 million at December 31, 2003. Beginning January 1, 2004, the deferred sales inducements are reported separately on the balance sheet and the amortization of deferred sales inducements is reported in interest sensitive and index product benefits on the consolidated statement of income. Amounts related to sales inducements in the 2003 consolidated financial statements, previously reported with deferred policy acquisition costs, have been reclassified to conform to the 2004 financial statement presentation. The adoption of SOP 03-1 provisions relating to sales inducements had no impact on net income for the second quarter or six-month periods ended June 30, 2004.

Effective July 1, 2003, we adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (Statement) No. 149, “Amendment of Statement 133 on Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities.” Statement No. 149 codifies several Derivatives Implementation Group (DIG) issues, including DIG Issue C18, “Scope Exceptions: Shortest Period Criterion for Applying the Regular-Way Security Trades Exception to When-Issued Securities or Other Securities That Do Not Yet Exist.” DIG Issue C18 clarifies the applicability of Statement No. 133 to when-issued securities by holding that the regular-way security trade exception may not be applied to securities which are not settled within the shortest period possible for that security. If settlement does not occur within the shortest period possible, there is deemed to be a forward contract for the purchase of that security which is subject to fair value accounting under Statement No. 133. We occasionally purchase asset-backed securities and agree to settle at a future date, even though the same security or an essentially similar security could be settled at an earlier date. For these securities, any changes in the market value of the security from the trade date through the settlement date are recorded as derivative income (loss) rather than as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss). The adoption of Statement No. 149 resulted in no change to net income for the second quarter of 2004 and an increase to net income of less than $0.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2004.

Effective July 1, 2003, we also adopted Statement No. 150, “Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Characteristics of both Liabilities and Equity.” This Statement establishes standards for classifying and measuring as liabilities certain financial instruments that embody obligations of the issuer and have characteristics of both liabilities and equity. Upon adoption of this Statement, our company-obligated mandatorily redeemable preferred stock of subsidiary trust and Series C redeemable preferred stock were reclassified to debt on our consolidated balance sheet. There were no adjustments to the carrying values of these instruments upon reclassification. Also, in accordance with Statement No. 150, amounts previously classified as dividends on these financial instruments ($1.8 million in the second quarter of 2004 and $3.5 million for the six month period of 2004) are recorded as interest expense. All changes in classifications made due to the adoption of Statement No. 150 were made on a prospective basis only as reclassification of prior period amounts was not permitted. The adoption of Statement No. 150 resulted in a $0.5 million decrease to net income for the second quarter of 2004 and a $1.1 million decrease to net income for the six months ended June 30, 2004. The adoption of Statement No. 150 did not impact net income applicable to common stock or earnings per common share.

Effective October 1, 2003, we adopted the DIG’s Statement 133 Implementation Issue No. B36, “Embedded Derivatives: Modified Coinsurance Arrangements and Debt Instruments that Incorporate Credit Risk Exposures that are Unrelated or Only Partially Related to the Creditworthiness of the Obligor under those Instruments” (DIG B36). DIG B36 addresses whether Statement No. 133 requires bifurcation of modified coinsurance arrangements and debt instruments into a debt host contract and an embedded derivative if the coinsurance agreement or debt instrument incorporates credit risk exposures that are unrelated or only partially related to the creditworthiness of the obligor of that agreement or instrument. Under DIG B36, a modified coinsurance agreement where interest on funds withheld is determined by reference to a pool of fixed maturity assets is an example of an arrangement containing embedded

9

Table of Contents

derivatives requiring bifurcation. Embedded derivatives in these contracts are to be recorded at fair value at each balance sheet date and changes in the fair values of the derivatives are recorded as income or expense. This guidance applies to general account investments supporting our variable alliance business. The fair value of the embedded derivatives pertaining to funds withheld on variable business assumed by us totaled $0.4 million at June 30, 2004 and $0.5 million at December 31, 2003, and the fair value of the embedded derivatives pertaining to funds withheld on variable business ceded by us was less than $0.1 million at June 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003. Net income decreased by ($0.1) million for the second quarter of 2004 and less than $0.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2004 as a result of adopting DIG B36.

In January 2003, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued FASB Interpretation No. 46, “Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities, an Interpretation of ARB No. 51.” Interpretation No. 46 establishes a variable interests model to follow when determining whether or not to consolidate an entity that is not evaluated for consolidation under the traditional voting interests model. This Interpretation generally requires that a company (investee) being evaluated under the variable interests model be consolidated if (a) the investor has decision making powers over the entity – that is, the ability to buy and sell assets or conduct operations or (b) the investor is exposed to the majority of the risks or rewards of the entity. In addition, the Interpretation requires that investments made by related parties be analyzed together in applying the variable interest model. The disclosure provisions of this Interpretation are effective for financial statements issued after January 31, 2003. The consolidation provisions are effective for new transactions entered into after January 31, 2003 and for pre-existing entities as of December 31, 2003.

Upon adoption of Interpretation No. 46, effective December 31, 2003, the subsidiary trust that issued the company-obligated mandatorily redeemable preferred stock was deconsolidated. The effect of this deconsolidation is to replace the obligations of the trust to the preferred security holders with our subordinated debt obligation to the trust and our equity investment in the trust. In addition, the dividends on the company-obligated mandatorily redeemable preferred stock of the trust are replaced in our consolidated statements of income with the interest expense on our subordinated debt obligation to the trust and the dividends we receive on our equity investment in the trust. We record our subordinated debt obligation to the trust and our equity investment in the trust, along with the related interest expense and dividend income, on a net basis due to the contractual right of setoff. The adoption of the Interpretation with respect to the subsidiary trust has no impact on net income or earnings per common share.

10

Table of Contents

Stock-Based Compensation

Under Statement No. 123, we use the prospective method for the expensing of stock options issued after January 1, 2003. The following table illustrates the effect on net income and earnings per share if the fair value based method had been applied to all outstanding and unvested awards in each period.

Income Taxes

The effective tax rate for the second quarter was 24.7% in 2004 and 32.9% in 2003 and for the six-month period was 29.8% in 2004 compared to 32.3% in 2003. The decrease in the effective tax rate is attributable to a $1.6 million tax benefit recorded in the second quarter of 2004 relating to the reversal of a tax accrual. During the second quarter of 2004, based on events and analysis performed during the quarter, we determined that a tax accrual was no longer necessary and a related benefit totaling $1.6 million was recorded.

Reclassifications

Certain amounts related to derivative instruments in the 2003 consolidated financial statements have been reclassified to conform to the 2004 financial statement presentation.

2. Credit Arrangements

In connection with the 2001 acquisition of Kansas Farm Bureau Life Insurance Company, we issued 3,411,000 shares of Series C cumulative voting mandatorily redeemable preferred stock with an estimated fair value of $80.0 million to the Kansas Farm Bureau Federation. Each share of Series C preferred stock has a par value of $26.8404 and voting rights identical to that of Class A common stock. Dividends on the Series C preferred stock are payable quarterly at a rate equal to the regular cash dividends per share of common stock, as defined, then payable. We redeemed 1,687,000 shares, or $45.3 million, of the Series C preferred stock on January 2, 2004, in accordance with the scheduled redemption dates under the agreement. The remaining balance is scheduled to be redeemed for cash at par value, or $46.3 million, on January 3, 2006. Should we, in our sole discretion, determine that we are unable to redeem the remaining balance for cash, the redemption would be funded with shares of Class A common stock. The number of shares of Class A common stock to be issued in exchange for one share of Series C preferred stock would be the cash redemption price divided by the average daily closing price per share of Class A common stock for the ten trading days preceding the redemption. In the event of a change in the control of the Company, at the option of the holder, each share of Series C preferred stock is convertible into one share of Class A common stock or

11

Table of Contents

redeemable for cash at par. Conversion of the Series C preferred stock is not assumed for purposes of calculating earnings per share – assuming dilution because the contingencies allowing the conversion have not been met. The Series C preferred stock was issued at an $11.6 million discount to par. This discount accretes to interest expense during the life of the securities using the effective interest method.

In December 2003, we entered into a $60.0 million revolving line of credit agreement with LaSalle Bank National Association and Bankers Trust Company, N.A. This agreement is effective through October 31, 2005 and interest on any borrowings accrues at a variable rate (2.16% at June 30, 2004). Under this agreement, we are required to maintain minimum capital and surplus levels at the Life Companies and meet certain other financial covenants. We are also prohibited from incurring additional indebtedness in excess of $10.0 million while this agreement is in effect. In January 2004, we borrowed $46.0 million on this line of credit to fund the partial redemption of our Series C preferred stock discussed above.

On April 12, 2004, we issued $75.0 million of 5.85% Senior Notes (Senior Notes) due April 15, 2014. Interest on the Senior Notes will be paid semi-annually beginning October 15, 2004. The Senior Notes are redeemable in whole or in part at any time at our option at a “make-whole” redemption price equal to the greater of 100% of their principal amount or the sum of the present values of the remaining scheduled payments of principal and interest on the Senior Notes, discounted to the redemption date on a semiannual basis at the treasury rate plus 25 basis points.

We entered into a treasury rate lock agreement (“rate lock”) on March 18, 2004 to hedge the interest rate on a portion of the Senior Notes. The rate lock had a $50.0 million notional amount and was based on the 10-year Treasury interest rate at the contract’s inception (3.797%). We formally documented this hedging relationship, including identification of the rate lock as the hedging instrument and the 20 semi-annual interest payments on $50.0 million of the Senior Notes as the hedged transactions. We also documented our risk management objectives and strategies for undertaking this transaction. The rate lock agreement is accounted for as a cash flow hedge. The rate lock was settled on April 6, 2004 and proceeds totaling $1.5 million were deferred and are being amortized over the term of the Senior Notes, along with underwriting fees, offering expenses and original issue discount of the Senior Notes, using the effective interest method. We received net proceeds of approximately $75.5 million from the issuance of the Senior Notes after underwriting fees, offering expenses, original issue discount and the impact of the rate lock.

The Senior Note offering would have caused us to violate the covenants of our revolving line of credit agreement with LaSalle Bank National Association and Bankers Trust Company, N.A. Therefore, on April 1, 2004, this agreement was amended to allow for the Senior Note offering without violating the financial covenants of that agreement.

3. Commitments and Contingencies

In the normal course of business, we may be involved in litigation where amounts are alleged that are substantially more than contractual policy benefits or those contained in certain other agreements. At June 30, 2004, management is not aware of any claims for which a material loss is reasonably possible.

We seek to limit our exposure to loss on any single insured or event and to recover a portion of benefits paid by ceding insurance to other insurance enterprises. Reinsurance contracts do not relieve us of our obligations to policyholders. To the extent that reinsuring companies are later unable to meet obligations under reinsurance agreements, our insurance subsidiaries would be liable for these obligations, and payment of these obligations could result in losses. To limit the possibility of such losses, we evaluate the financial condition of our reinsurers and monitor concentrations of credit risk. No allowance for uncollectible amounts has been established against our asset for reinsurance recoverable since none of our receivables are deemed to be uncollectible.

We participate in a reinsurance pool with various unaffiliated life insurance companies to mitigate the impact of a catastrophic event on our financial position and results of operations. Members of the pool share in the eligible catastrophic losses based on their size and contribution to the pool. Under the pool arrangement, we will be able to cede approximately 60% of catastrophic losses after other reinsurance and a deductible of $0.7 million. Pool losses are capped at $6.9 million per event and the maximum loss we could incur as a result of losses assumed from other pool members is $2.7 million per event. In April 2004, we purchased additional catastrophic coverage which provides $10.0 million of coverage in excess of the reinsurance pool limit of $6.9 million.

12

Table of Contents

We self-insure our employee health and dental claims; however, claims in excess of self-insurance levels are fully insured. We fund insurance claims through a self-insurance trust. Deposits to the trust are made at an amount equal to our best estimate of claims incurred during the period. Accordingly, no accruals are recorded on our financial statements for unpaid claims and claims incurred but not reported. Adjustments, if any, resulting in changes in the estimate of claims incurred will be reflected in operations in the periods in which such adjustments are known.

4. Earnings per Share

The following table sets forth the computation of earnings per common share and earnings per common share – assuming dilution.