Back to GetFilings.com

Table of Contents

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2004

OR

Commission File Number 0-29480

HERITAGE FINANCIAL CORPORATION

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

(360) 943-1500

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Not Applicable

(Former name, former address and former

fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the last practicable date:

As of July 13, 2004 there were 5,904,092 common shares outstanding, with no par value, of the registrant.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    Yes  x    No  ¨

Table of Contents

HERITAGE FINANCIAL CORPORATION

FORM 10-Q

INDEX

Page 2

Table of Contents

HERITAGE FINANCIAL CORPORATION

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME

(Dollars in thousands, except for per share data)

(Unaudited)

See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

Page 3

Table of Contents

HERITAGE FINANCIAL CORPORATION

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION

(Dollars in thousands)

(Unaudited)

See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

Page 4

Table of Contents

HERITAGE FINANCIAL CORPORATION

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY FOR THE SIX MONTHS

ENDED JUNE 30, 2004 AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME FOR THE THREE AND SIX MONTHS ENDED

JUNE 30, 2004 and 2003

(In Thousands)

(Unaudited)

See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

Page 5

Table of Contents

HERITAGE FINANCIAL CORPORATION

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

For the six months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003

(Dollars in thousands)

(Unaudited)

See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

Page 6

Table of Contents

HERITAGE FINANCIAL CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2004 and 2003

(Unaudited)

NOTE 1. Description of Business and Basis of Presentation

(a.) Description of Business

Heritage Financial Corporation is a bank holding company that was incorporated in the State of Washington in August 1997. We were organized for the purpose of acquiring all of the capital stock of Heritage Bank upon our reorganization from a mutual holding company form of organization to a stock holding company form of organization.

We are primarily engaged in the business of planning, directing, and coordinating the business activities of our wholly owned subsidiaries: Heritage Bank and Central Valley Bank, N.A. Heritage Bank is a Washington state-chartered savings bank whose deposits are insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) under the Savings Association Insurance Fund (SAIF). Effective April 29, 2004, Heritage announced it’s intent to convert Heritage Bank to a state commercial bank. Heritage Bank conducts business from its main office in Olympia, Washington and its eleven branch offices located in Thurston, Pierce, and Mason Counties. Central Valley Bank, N.A. is a national bank whose deposits are insured by the FDIC under the Bank Insurance Fund (BIF). Central Valley Bank, N.A. conducts business from its main office in Toppenish, Washington and its five branch offices located in Yakima and Kittitas Counties.

Our business consists primarily of lending and deposit relationships with small businesses and their owners in our market area, attracting deposits from the general public and originating for sale or investment purposes first mortgage loans on residential properties located in western and central Washington. We also make residential construction loans, income property loans, and consumer loans.

(b.) Basis of Presentation

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared, without audit, pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for complete financial statements. These consolidated financial statements should be read with our December 31, 2003 audited consolidated financial statements and its accompanying notes included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K. In our opinion, all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring adjustments) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. Operating results for the six months ended June 30, 2004 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ended December 31, 2004. In preparing the consolidated financial statements, we are required to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues, and expenses. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

(c). Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

In May 2003, the FASB issued FAS No. 150, Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Characteristics of both Liabilities and Equity. The provisions of this Statement are effective for financial instruments entered into or modified after May 31, 2003, and otherwise are effective at the beginning of the first interim period beginning after June 15, 2003. It is to be implemented by reporting the cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle for financial instruments created before May 15, 2003 and still existing at the beginning of the interim period of adoption. Restatement is not permitted. Application of this Interpretation did not have an effect on our financial statements.

In December 2003, the FASB amended FAS No. 132, Employers’ Disclosures about Pensions and Other Postretirement Benefits—an amendment of FASB Statements No. 87, 88, and 106. The provisions of this Statement are effective for

Page 7

Table of Contents

financial statements with fiscal years ending after December 15, 2003. The Statement revises employers’ disclosures about pension plans and other postretirement benefit plans. It does not change the measurement or recognition of those plans required by FASB Statements No. 87, Employers’ Accounting for Pensions, No. 88, Employers’ Accounting for Settlements and Curtailments of Defined Benefit Pension Plans and for Termination Benefits, and No. 106, Employers’ Accounting for Postretirement Benefits Other Than Pensions. This Statement retains the disclosure requirements contained in FASB Statement No. 132, Employers’ Disclosures about Pensions and Other Postretirement Benefits, which it replaces. It requires additional disclosures to those in the original Statement 132 about the assets, obligations, cash flows, and net periodic benefit cost of defined benefit pension plans and other defined benefit postretirement plans. The required information should be provided separately for pension plans and for other postretirement benefit plans. Application of this Interpretation did not have an effect on our financial statements.

The Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) Issue 03-1, “The Meaning of Other-Than-Temporary Impairment and Its Application to Certain Investments.” In connection with its discussion of EITF Issue No. 02-14, “Whether the Equity Method of Accounting Applies When an Investor Does Not Have an Investment in Voting Stock of an Investee but Exercises Significant Influence through Other Means,” at the November 21, 2002 meeting, the Task Force discussed the meaning of other-than-temporary impairment and its application to certain investments carried at cost. The Task Force requested that the FASB staff consider other impairment models within U.S. GAAP when developing its views. At the November 25, 2003 EITF meeting, the Board ratified a consensus that certain quantitative and qualitative disclosures for periods ending after December 15, 2003 should be required for securities accounted for under Statement 115 that are impaired at the balance sheet date but for which an other-than-temporary impairment has not been recognized. Application of this Interpretation did not have a material effect on our financial statements.

In December 2003, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation (FIN) No. 46 (revised December 2003), Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities, which addressed how a business enterprise should evaluate whether it has a controlling financial interest in an entity through means other than voting rights and accordingly should consolidate the entity. FIN 46R replaces FASB Interpretation No. 46, Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities, which was issued in January 2003. The Company will be required to apply FIN 46R to variable interests in variable interest entities (VIEs) created after December 31, 2003. For VIEs created before January 1, 2004, the Interpretation will be applied beginning on January 1, 2005. For any VIEs that must be consolidated under FIN 46R that were created before January 1, 2004, the assets, liabilities and noncontrolling interests of the VIE initially would be measured at their carrying amounts with any difference between the net amount added to the balance sheet and any previously recognized interest being recognized as the cumulative effect of an accounting change. If determining the carrying amounts is not practicable, fair value at the date FIN 46R first applies may be used to measure the assets, liabilities, and noncontrolling interests of the VIE. Application of this Interpretation did not have an effect on our financial statements.

Page 8

Table of Contents

NOTE 2. Stockholders’ Equity

(a.) Earnings per Share

The following table illustrates the reconciliation of weighted average shares used for earnings per share for the noted periods.

As of June 30, 2004, there were 276,030 anti-dilutive shares outstanding and as of June 30, 2003 there were no anti-dilutive shares outstanding related to options to acquire common stock.

(b.) Cash Dividend Declared

On June 17, 2004, we announced a quarterly cash dividend of 16 cents per share payable on July 29, 2004 to stockholders of record on July 15, 2004.

Page 9

Table of Contents

NOTE 3. Stock Based Compensation

The Company measures its employee stock-based compensation arrangements using the provisions outlined in Accounting Principles Board (APB) Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, which is an intrinsic value-based method of recognizing compensation costs. The Company has adopted the disclosure-only provisions of SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-based Compensation. As most of the Company’s stock options have no intrinsic value at grant date, compensation cost generally has not been recognized for its stock option plan activity. However, compensation expense was recognized during 2003 and 2004 resulting from restricted stock awards and certain incentive stock options. If the Company had elected to recognize compensation cost on the fair value at the grant dates for awards under its plans, consistent with the method prescribed by SFAS No. 123, net income and earnings per share would have been changed to the pro forma amounts for the following periods:

The compensation expense included in the pro forma net income is not likely representative of the effect on reported net income for future years because options vest over several years and additional awards generally are made each year.

The fair value of options granted during the six months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003 is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes options pricing model. The following assumptions were used to calculate the fair value of the options granted:

Page 10

Table of Contents

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION

AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following discussion is intended to assist in understanding the financial condition and results of the Company. The information contained in this section should be read with the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and its accompanying notes, and the December 31, 2003 audited consolidated financial statements and its accompanying notes included in our recent Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Statements concerning future performance, developments or events, expectations for growth and market forecasts, and any other guidance on future periods, constitute forward-looking statements and are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties, which might cause actual results to differ materially from stated expectations. Specific factors include, but are not limited to, the effect of interest rate changes, risks associated with acquisition of other banks and opening new branches, the ability to control costs and expenses, and general economic conditions. Additional information on these and other factors, which could affect our financial results, are included in our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Overview

Heritage Financial Corporation is a bank holding company, which primarily engages in the business activities of our wholly owned subsidiaries: Heritage Bank and Central Valley Bank. We provide financial services to our local communities with an ongoing strategic focus in expanding our commercial lending relationships, market expansion and a continual focus on asset quality. Effective January 8, 1998, our common stock began to trade on the NASDAQ National Market under the symbol “HFWA”.

Financial Condition Data

Total assets increased $24.6 million (3.8%) to $665.5 million as of June 30, 2004 from the December 31, 2003 balance of $640.9 million. Deposits increased $18.9 million (3.5%) to $560.7 million as of June 30, 2004 from the December 31, 2003 balance of $541.8 million. For the same period, net loans, which include loans held for sale but are net of the allowance for loan losses, increased $32.4 million (6.3%) to $546.1 million as of June 30, 2004 from the December 31, 2003 balance of $513.7 million. Commercial loans increased by $14.7 million to $281.0 million as of June 30, 2004 from the December 31, 2003 balance of $266.3 million. Commercial loans continue to be the largest segment of loans at 50.7% and 51.1% as a percentage of total loans as of June 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003, respectively.

The Company’s stock repurchase program continues to contribute to earnings per share. As of June 30, 2004, we have repurchased a total of 5,569,491 shares, or 51.3% of the total outstanding at March 1999, at an average price of $12.62 per share. During the quarter ended June 30, 2004, we repurchased 162,200 shares at an average price of $19.18. During the six months ended June 30, 2004, we repurchased 392,937 shares at an average price of $20.63. We began our most recent repurchase program on March 22, 2004 with the goal to repurchase approximately 5% of our outstanding shares over a period of eighteen months. We completed that program on June 28, 2004 having purchased 307,200 shares at an average price of $20.25 per share. We continually evaluate share repurchases and as long as our capital ratios remain strong and as long as we believe that repurchasing our shares returns value to our shareholders we will continue to do so.

Earnings Summary

Net income for the three months ended June 30, 2004 was $0.38 per diluted share compared to $0.32 per diluted share for the same period last year, an increase of 18.8%. Actual earnings for the three months ended June 30, 2004 were $2.290 million compared to $2.206 million for the same period in 2003, an increase of 3.8%. Net income for the six months ended June 30, 2004 was $0.73 per diluted share compared to $0.62 per diluted share for the same period last year, an increase of 17.7%. Actual earnings for the six months ended June 30, 2004 were $4.509 million compared to $4.267 million for the same period in 2003, an increase of 5.7%. The difference in performance on a per share basis versus actual dollar basis is the result of our stock repurchase program that has continued to be accretive to earnings per share.

Page 11

Table of Contents

For the quarter ended June 30, 2004, return on average equity improved to 15.36% from 12.46% for the quarter ended June 30, 2003 and increased from this year’s first quarter return of 14.13%. The Company’s capital position remains strong at 8.55% of total assets as of June 30, 2004, down from 11.01% at June 30, 2003. Average equity for the quarter ended June 30, 2004 declined to $59.6 million from $70.8 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2003. For the six months ended June 30, 2004, the Company’s return on average equity increased to 14.73% from 11.92% for the six months ended June 30, 2003. Average equity for the six months ended June 30, 2004 declined to $61.2 million from $71.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2003.

Net Interest Income

Net interest income before provision for loan losses for the three months ended June 30, 2004 increased 6.4% to $7.789 million from $7.323 million for the same quarter in 2003. Net interest income before provision for loan losses for the six months ended June 30, 2004 increased 6.1% to $15.497 million from $14.600 million for the same period in 2003. The net interest margin (net interest income divided by average interest earning assets) decreased to 5.14% for the current quarter from 5.43% for the same quarter last year. The net interest margin decreased to 5.15% for the six months ended June 30, 2004 from 5.39% for the same period in 2003.

Interest income increased $260,000, or 2.8%, as compared to the second quarter last year and interest expense declined $206,000, or 11.0%, during this same period. Interest income for the six months ended June 30, 2003 increased $358,000 as compared to the same period last year and interest expense declined $539,000, or 13.9%, during this same period. Loans averaged $535.0 million with an average yield of 6.69% for the three months ended June 30, 2004 compared to average loans of $474.1 million with an average yield of 7.35% for the same period in 2003. Loans averaged $528.2 million with an average yield of 6.73% for the six months ended June 30, 2004 compared to average loans of $465.9 million with an average yield of 7.45% for the same period in 2003. Interest bearing deposits averaged $486.8 million with an average cost of 1.29% for the three months ended June 30, 2004 compared to $446.2 million with an average cost of 1.65% for the same period in 2003. Interest bearing deposits averaged $480.6 million with an average cost of 1.31% for the six months ended June 30, 2004 compared to $448.2 million with an average cost of 1.71% for the same period in 2003.

Provision for Loan Losses

The provision for loan losses was $180,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2004, down from $330,000 for the second quarter of 2003. The provision for loan losses was $360,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2004 down from $825,000 for the same period in 2003. We believe that with an improved local economy and with our reduced level of non-performing and criticized assets the reduction in the provision this year is appropriate.

Noninterest Income

Noninterest income decreased 14.5% to $1.703 million for the second quarter of 2004 compared with $1.991 million for the same quarter in 2003. Noninterest income decreased 9.7% to $3.265 million for the six months ended June 30, 2004 from $3.617 million for same period in 2003. The decrease is the result of reduced mortgage banking income, which was down 65.9%, or $422,000 for the second quarter of 2004 compared to the same quarter last year and 52.8%, or $557,000, for the six months ended June 30, 2004 compared to the same period last year. We have taken steps to reduce our staffing levels related to mortgage banking related to sharply reduced levels of mortgage banking activity and lower income. As a result, we expect lower noninterest expense related to mortgage banking in the second half of the year. The mortgage banking income decline was offset by $73,000 in Other Real Estate Owned (OREO) gains during the three and six months ended June 30, 2004 compared with zero gains in the same periods in the prior year. Merchant Visa income provided a 21.7% increase, or $85,000, and 20.9%, or $150,000, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2004, respectively over the same periods last year.

Page 12

Table of Contents

Noninterest Expense

Noninterest expense increased 5.3% to $5.903 million during the second quarter of 2004 compared to $5.608 million for the second quarter of 2003. Noninterest expense increased 7.5% to $11.666 million for the six months ended June 30, 2004 from $10.857 million for the same period last year. The majority of the increase occurred in salaries and employee benefits which were up 5.6% to $3.111 million for the three months ended June 30, 2004 compared to the same period last year. Salaries and benefits increased 8.5% to $6.237 million for the six months ended June 30, 2004 from $5.750 million for the same period last year. Salaries were up over last year as a result of normal salary increases, increased full-time equivalents and lower FAS 91 salary deferrals.

The efficiency ratio for the quarter ended June 30, 2004 was 62.18% compared to 60.21% for the comparable quarter in 2003. The efficiency ratio for the six months ended June 30, 2004 was 62.18% compared to 59.60% for the same period last year. The efficiency ratio increases are related to increased noninterest expenses such as salaries, technology investments in our Central Valley Bank affiliate and benefit expenses related to health care costs.

Lending Activities

As indicated in the table below, total loans increased to $554.2 million at June 30, 2004 from $521.4 million at December 31, 2003.

Page 13

Table of Contents

Nonperforming Assets

The following table describes our nonperforming assets for the dates indicated.

Nonperforming assets decreased to $651,000, or 0.10% of total assets, at June 30, 2004 from $686,000, or 0.11% of total assets at December 31, 2003. We believe that we are adequately reserved for any potential losses.

Analysis of Allowance for Loan Losses

Management maintains an allowance for loan losses to absorb estimated credit losses associated with the loan and lease portfolio, including all binding commitments to lend. We determine an adequate allowance through our ongoing quarterly loan quality assessments.

We assess the estimated credit losses inherent in our non-classified loan portfolio by considering a number of elements including:

We calculate an adequate allowance for the non-classified portion of our loan portfolio based on an appropriate percentage risk factor that is calculated based on the above-noted elements and trends. We add specific provisions for each classified loan after a careful analysis of that loan’s credit and collateral factors. Our analysis of an adequate allowance combines the provisions made for both our non-classified loans and the specific provisions made for classified loans.

Page 14

Table of Contents

We determine our provision expense for the next quarter by applying the same percentage risk factor applied to the non-classified loan portfolio to our expected loan growth. We determine our monthly provision expense by dividing our estimate of provision expense for the quarter by three.

Our historical loan loss experience remains low, however, we believe that it is appropriate to maintain a higher allowance for estimated credit losses, particularly with respect to our commercial loan portfolio, than our historical loan loss experience indicates.

We have increased our allowance for loan losses over the past several years during periods of strong loan growth and changes in our loan portfolio composition. In recent years, our commercial loan portfolio has grown as a percentage of the total loan portfolio, while other less risky categories, such as the residential mortgage portfolio, have declined as a percentage of the total portfolio.

While we believe we use the best information available to determine the allowance for loan losses, net income could be significantly affected if circumstances differ substantially from the assumptions used in determining the allowance or unforeseen market conditions arise that cause adjustments to the allowance for loan losses.

The following table summarizes the changes in our allowance for loan losses:

While pursuing our growth strategy, we continue to employ prudent underwriting and sound monitoring procedures to maintain asset quality. The allowance for loan losses during the six months ended June 30, 2004 increased by $343,000 to $8.09 million from $7.75 million at December 31, 2003. The growth in the allowance was due to a $360,000 provision, which was partially offset by $17,000 in net charge offs during the period. While pleased with the low level of charge offs in the first six months of this year, we cannot predict with any certainty the future level of charge offs.