Back to GetFilings.com

Table of Contents

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 2004.

OR

FOR THE TRANSITION PERIOD FROM              TO             .

Commission file number: 1-10989

Ventas, Inc.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

(502) 357-9000

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.

Table of Contents

VENTAS, INC.

FORM 10-Q

INDEX

2

Table of Contents

PART I—FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

VENTAS, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(In thousands)

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements

3

Table of Contents

VENTAS, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME

(Unaudited)

(In thousands, except per share amounts)

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements

4

Table of Contents

VENTAS, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

(Unaudited)

(In thousands)

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements

5

Table of Contents

VENTAS, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(Unaudited)

(In thousands)

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements

6

Table of Contents

VENTAS, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

NOTE 1—REPORTING ENTITY

Ventas, Inc. (“Ventas” or the “Company”) is a Delaware corporation that elected to be taxed as a real estate investment trust (“REIT”) under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, beginning with the year ended December 31, 1999. Beginning with the 1999 tax year, the Company believes that it has satisfied the requirements to qualify as a REIT. The Company intends to continue to qualify as a REIT for the year ending December 31, 2004 and subsequent years. It is possible that economic, market, legal, tax or other considerations may cause the Company to fail, or elect not, to qualify as a REIT. The Company owns a geographically diverse portfolio of healthcare related facilities that consisted of 42 hospitals, 201 skilled nursing facilities, 27 senior housing facilities and 11 other facilities in 39 states as of June 30, 2004. Except for the leases on the Company’s two medical office buildings, the Company and its subsidiaries lease these facilities to healthcare operating companies under “triple-net” or “absolute net” leases. Kindred Healthcare, Inc. and its subsidiaries (collectively, “Kindred”) lease 186 of the Company’s nursing facilities and all but one of the Company’s hospitals as of June 30, 2004. The Company also has real estate loan investments relating to 25 healthcare and senior housing facilities. The Company conducts substantially all of its business through a direct wholly owned operating partnership, Ventas Realty, Limited Partnership (“Ventas Realty”), an indirect wholly owned limited liability company, Ventas Finance I, LLC (“Ventas Finance”) and an operating partnership, ElderTrust Operating Partnership (“ETOP”) in which the Company indirectly owns 99.6% of the partnership units. As of June 30, 2004, Ventas Realty owned 40 of the Company’s hospitals, 156 of the Company’s skilled nursing facilities and 20 of the Company’s senior housing and other healthcare facilities, Ventas Finance owned 39 of the Company’s skilled nursing facilities, and ETOP owned five of the Company’s skilled nursing facilities and ten of the Company’s senior housing facilities. The Company directly owned two hospitals.

NOTE 2—BASIS OF PRESENTATION

The accompanying unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”) for interim financial information and with instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by GAAP for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for a fair statement of results for the interim period have been included. Operating results for the six-month period ended June 30, 2004 are not necessarily an indication of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2004. The Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2003 has been derived from the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2003. These financial statements and related notes should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes thereto included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003. Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform to current year presentation.

The Company has one primary reportable segment, which consists of investments in real estate. The Company’s primary business consists of financing, owning and leasing healthcare-related and senior housing facilities. See “Note 3—Concentration of Credit Risk.” Except for the leases on the Company’s two medical office buildings, all of the Company’s leases are triple-net leases, which require the tenants to pay all property-related expenses. Except for the two medical office buildings, the Company does not operate its facilities nor does it allocate capital to maintain its properties. Substantially all depreciation and interest expense reflected in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income relates to the Company’s investment in real estate.

7

Table of Contents

VENTAS, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

(Unaudited)

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

In January 2003, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Interpretation No. 46, “Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities, an Interpretation of Accounting Research Bulletin No. 51” (“FIN No. 46”). FIN No. 46 provides a new consolidation model which determines consolidation based on potential variability in gains and losses of the entity being evaluated. FIN No. 46 became applicable in the first period ended after March 15, 2004 for all variable interest entities. The adoption of FIN No. 46 did not have any impact on the Company’s current presentation of its Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

In December 2002, FASB issued Statements of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 148, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation—Transition and Disclosure” (“SFAS No. 148”). SFAS No. 148 provides transition methods for entities that elect to adopt the fair value method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation. In addition, SFAS No. 148 requires disclosure of comparable information regarding the Company’s method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation for all interim periods. The Company has stock-based employee compensation plans which are described in “Note 7—Stockholders’ Equity and Stock Options.” The Company accounts for these plans under the intrinsic method of Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees” (“APB Opinion No. 25”), and related interpretations. No stock-based employee compensation cost for options is reflected in net income, as all options granted under the Company’s plans had an exercise price equal to the market value of the underlying common stock on the date of the grant. The Company intends to adopt the fair value method of accounting at such time FASB adopts final rules regarding the appropriate valuation methods. In addition, the Company grants shares of restricted stock to certain officers and directors. Shares of restricted stock vest cumulatively in two to four equal annual installments beginning either on the date of the grant or on the first anniversary of the date of the grant. In accordance with the provisions of APB Opinion No. 25, compensation expense is recognized for these restricted stock grants over these vesting periods.

NOTE 3—CONCENTRATION OF CREDIT RISK

As of June 30, 2004, approximately 58.0% of the Company’s properties, based on the original cost of such properties, were skilled nursing facilities. The Company’s remaining properties consist of hospitals, personal care facilities and other healthcare-related and senior housing facilities. The Company’s facilities are located in 39 states with rental revenues from operations in only one state accounting for more than ten percent (10%) of the Company’s total revenues during the year ended December 31, 2003 and the six months ended June 30, 2004.

As of June 30, 2004, approximately 71.2% of the Company’s properties, based on the original cost of such properties, were operated by Kindred. Approximately 84.4% of the Company’s total real estate revenue for the six months ended June 30, 2004 was derived from the four amended and restated master lease agreements dated as of April 20, 2001 between Ventas Realty and Kindred (as amended, the “Amended Master Leases”) and the master lease agreement dated as of December 12, 2001 between Ventas Finance and Kindred (as amended and, collectively with the Amended Master Leases, the “Kindred Master Leases”).

There can be no assurance that Kindred will have sufficient assets, income and access to financing to enable it to satisfy its obligations under the Kindred Master Leases or that Kindred will perform its obligations under the Kindred Master Leases. The failure of Kindred to make three consecutive monthly rental payments under any of the Kindred Master Leases will trigger an event of default under the Company’s Second Amended and Restated Security and Guaranty Agreement dated as of April 17, 2002 (the “2002 Credit Agreement”). The inability or unwillingness of Kindred to satisfy its obligations under the Kindred Master Leases would have a material adverse effect on the business, financial condition, results of operations and liquidity of the Company, on the

8

Table of Contents

VENTAS, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

(Unaudited)

Company’s ability to service its indebtedness and other obligations, and on the Company’s ability to make distributions to its stockholders as required to maintain its status as a REIT (a “Material Adverse Effect”).

Kindred is subject to the reporting requirements of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission”) and is required to file with the Commission annual reports containing audited financial information and quarterly reports containing unaudited financial information. The information related to Kindred provided in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q is derived from filings made with the Commission or other publicly available information, or has been provided to the Company by Kindred. The Company has not verified this information either through an independent investigation or by reviewing Kindred’s public filings. The Company has no reason to believe that such information is inaccurate in any material respect, but there can be no assurance that all such information is accurate. Kindred’s filings with the Commission can be found at the Commission’s website at www.sec.gov/edgar/. The Company is providing this data for informational purposes only, and the reader of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q is encouraged to obtain Kindred’s publicly available filings from the Commission.

Agreement of Indemnity—Third Party Leases

In connection with the Company’s spin off of Kindred in 1998 (the “1998 Spin Off”), the Company assigned its former third party lease obligations (i.e., leases under which an unrelated third party is the landlord) as a tenant or as a guarantor of tenant obligations to Kindred (the “Third Party Leases”). Under the terms of an indemnity agreement relating to the Third Party Leases, Kindred has agreed to indemnify and hold the Company harmless from and against all claims against the Company arising out of the Third Party Leases assigned by the Company to Kindred. Either prior to or following the 1998 Spin Off, the tenant’s rights under a subset of the Third Party Leases were assigned or sublet to third parties unrelated to Kindred. If Kindred or such third party subtenants are unable to or do not satisfy the obligations under any Third Party Lease assigned by the Company to Kindred, the lessors may claim that the Company remains liable under the Third Party Leases. The Company believes it may have valid legal defenses to any such claim. However, there can be no assurance the Company would prevail against a claim brought by a lessor under a Third Party Lease. In the event that a lessor should prevail in a claim against the Company, the Company may be entitled to receive revenues from those properties that would mitigate the costs incurred in connection with the satisfaction of such obligations. The Third Party Leases that relate to nursing facilities, hospitals, offices and warehouses have remaining terms (excluding renewal periods) of 1 to 10 years. The Third Party Leases that relate to ground leases have remaining terms from 1 to 80 years. Under Kindred’s April 2001 bankruptcy plan of reorganization (the “Final Plan”), Kindred assumed and has agreed to fulfill its obligations under the indemnity agreement relating to the Third Party Leases. There can be no assurance that Kindred will have sufficient assets, income and access to financing to enable it to satisfy, or that it will continue to honor, its obligations under the indemnity agreement relating to the Third Party Leases. Under the Final Plan, Kindred has agreed not to renew or extend any Third Party Lease unless it first obtains a release of the Company from liability under such Third Party Lease. As of June 30, 2004, the total aggregate remaining minimum rental payments under the Third Party Leases were $28.4 million.

Agreement of Indemnity—Third Party Contracts

In connection with the 1998 Spin Off, the Company assigned its former third party guaranty agreements to Kindred (the “Third Party Guarantees”). The Company may remain liable on the Third Party Guarantees assigned to Kindred. Under the terms of an indemnity agreement relating to the Third Party Guarantees, Kindred has agreed to indemnify and hold the Company harmless from and against all claims against the Company arising out of the Third Party Guarantees assigned by the Company to Kindred. Under the Final Plan, Kindred assumed and agreed to fulfill its obligations under the indemnity agreement relating to the Third Party

9

Table of Contents

VENTAS, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

(Unaudited)

Guarantees. There can be no assurance that Kindred will have sufficient assets, income and access to financing to enable it to satisfy, or that it will continue to honor, its obligations incurred in connection with the indemnity agreement relating to the Third Party Guarantees. If Kindred is unable to or does not satisfy the obligations under any Third Party Guarantee assigned by the Company to Kindred, then the Company may be liable for the payment and performance of the obligations under any such agreement, but the Company believes it may have valid legal defenses to any such claim under a Third Party Guarantee. As of June 30, 2004, the Third Party Guarantees related to $5.0 million in outstanding obligations.

NOTE 4—DISPOSITIONS

In accordance with SFAS No. 144, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long Lived Assets” (“SFAS No. 144”), effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2001, the results of operations and gain/(loss) on real estate properties sold or held for sale subsequent to December 31, 2001 are reflected in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income as “Discontinued Operations” for all periods presented. Interest expense allocated to Discontinued Operations has been estimated based on a proportional allocation of rental income among all of the Company’s facilities.

On June 30, 2003, the Company sold to Kindred 16 skilled nursing facilities, consisting of 15 properties in Florida and one property in Texas, which had previously been leased to Kindred under the Kindred Master Leases, for $59.7 million in gross cash proceeds. A loss of $5.3 million was recognized and included in Discontinued Operations for the quarter ended June 30, 2003. In addition, Kindred paid the Company a $4.1 million lease termination fee with respect to such properties. The Company used a portion of the net proceeds from the sale and the lease termination fee to repay in full all unpaid amounts under the Company’s settlement agreement with the United States Department of Justice. The remaining net proceeds were used to reduce the Company’s outstanding indebtedness.

During the third quarter ended September 30, 2003, the Company sold a non-operating skilled nursing facility and received a non-binding proposal to purchase another non-operating skilled nursing facility. As a result, the Company recognized a gain of $2.1 million on the sold facility and also recorded a $0.8 million impairment on the other facility.

On December 11, 2003, the Company completed the sale of ten additional under-performing facilities to Kindred, which leased and operated those facilities prior to the sale, for $77.8 million, net of transaction costs. A gain of $54.9 million was recognized and included in Discontinued Operations for the year ended December 31, 2003. The Company also received from Kindred a $6.0 million lease termination fee on the sold facilities. The Company used the net proceeds from the sale and the lease termination fee to pay breakage costs relating to the termination of $120.0 million notional amount of the Company’s interest rate swap, to fund a portion of the $101.0 million equity portion of the purchase price of the ElderTrust Transaction (defined below), to reduce debt, and to fund other general corporate obligations.

10

Table of Contents

VENTAS, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

(Unaudited)

During the six months ended June 30, 2004, the Company did not dispose of any assets or have any operating assets classified as held for sale, and therefore no amounts were reported in discontinued operations. Set forth below is a summary of the results of operations of the facilities that were sold and held for sale during the three months ended and six months ended June 30, 2003 (in thousands):

NOTE 5—RECENT DEVELOPMENTS

Recent Developments Regarding Liquidity

Equity Offering

On March 15, 2004, the Company completed the sale of two million shares of the Company’s common stock in an underwritten public offering (the “Equity Offering”) under the Company’s universal shelf registration statement which was declared effective by the Commission on July 8, 2002. The Company received $51.1 million in net proceeds from the sale. The Company used the net proceeds to repay indebtedness under the 2002 Credit Agreement and for general corporate purposes, including the funding of a portion of the Brookdale Transaction (defined below). As of June 30, 2004, $599.1 million of securities remained available for offering under the Company’s universal shelf registration statement.

Recent Developments Regarding Dividends

The Company declared its first quarterly dividend for 2004 of $0.325 per share on February 26, 2004, which was paid in cash on March 25, 2004 to stockholders of record on March 15, 2004. The Company declared its second quarterly dividend for 2004 of $0.325 per share on May 21, 2004, which was paid in cash on June 24, 2004 to stockholders of record on June 7, 2004. As a REIT, the Company is required to distribute to its stockholders 90% of its taxable income. Although the Company currently intends to distribute 100% or more of its taxable income for 2004 in quarterly installments, there can be no assurance that it will do so or as to when the remaining distributions will be made.

The Company’s estimate of its 2004 taxable income and the related quarterly dividends is based on a number of assumptions, including, but not limited to, the following: Kindred performs its obligations under the Kindred Master Leases and the various agreements (the “Spin Agreements”) entered into by the Company and Kindred at the time of the 1998 Spin Off, as such agreements may have been amended and restated in connection with Kindred’s emergence from bankruptcy on April 20, 2001; the Company’s other tenants perform their obligations under their leases with the Company; no capital transactions, acquisitions or divestitures occur; the

11

Table of Contents

VENTAS, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

(Unaudited)

Company’s tax and accounting positions do not change; and the number of issued and outstanding shares of the Company’s common stock remain relatively unchanged. These assumptions impacting the estimate of the Company’s 2004 taxable income are subject to change and many are outside the control of the Company. If actual results vary from these assumptions, the Company’s expectations regarding future dividends may change.

For purposes of the required REIT distributions, the Company’s taxable income may vary significantly from historical results and from current income determined in accordance with GAAP depending on the resolution of a variety of factors. Under certain circumstances, the Company may be required to make distributions in excess of funds from operations (“FFO”) (as defined by the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts) in order to meet such distribution requirements. In the event that timing differences or cash needs occur, the Company may find it necessary to borrow funds or to issue equity securities (there being no assurance that it will be able to do so) or, if possible, to pay taxable stock dividends, distribute other property or securities or engage in a transaction intended to enable it to meet the REIT distribution requirements. The Company’s ability to engage in certain of these transactions may be restricted in certain circumstances by the terms of the indentures (the “Indentures”) governing the 8 ³/4% Senior Notes due 2009 in the original aggregate principal amount of $175.0 million (the “2009 Senior Notes”) and 9% Senior Notes due 2012 in the original aggregate principal amount of $225.0 million (the “2012 Senior Notes” and, together with the 2009 Senior Notes, the “Senior Notes”) of Ventas Realty and Ventas Capital Corporation and the 2002 Credit Agreement. If so restricted, such transaction would likely require the consent of the “Required Lenders” under the 2002 Credit Agreement and/or the holders of a majority in principal amount of the outstanding Senior Notes under each Indenture and there can be no assurance that such consents would be obtained. In addition, the failure or inability of Kindred to make rental payments under the Kindred Master Leases would materially impair the ability of the Company to make distributions. Consequently, there can be no assurance that the Company will be able to make distributions at the required distribution rate or any other rate.

Although the Company intends to continue to qualify as a REIT for the year ending December 31, 2004 and subsequent years, it is possible that economic, market, legal, tax or other considerations may cause the Company to fail, or elect not, to continue to qualify as a REIT in any such year. If the Company were to fail, or elect not, to continue to qualify as a REIT in any such year, the Company would be subject to 35% federal income tax and to the applicable state and local income taxes for the affected years. Such tax obligations would have a Material Adverse Effect on the Company. Unless eligible for limited relief, if the Company failed, or revoked its election, to qualify as a REIT, the Company would not be eligible to elect again to be treated as a REIT before the fifth taxable year after the year of such termination or revocation.

Recent Developments Regarding Acquisitions

Acquisitions Closed During the Second Quarter of 2004

During the period from April 1, 2004 through June 30, 2004, the Company acquired two skilled nursing facilities in a single transaction and two senior housing facilities in two separate transactions (the “Second Quarter Transactions”). The Company paid an aggregate purchase price of $69.8 million in cash for the four facilities. The four acquired facilities are leased by the Company to three operators under triple-net leases providing for aggregated, annual cash base rent of approximately $6.7 million, subject to escalation as provided in the leases. The leases have initial terms ranging from 10 to 15 years. One facility acquired by the Company during the second quarter (the “Seasons”) for a purchase price of $41.8 million is being operated by an affiliate of Brookdale (defined below) and is part of the Brookdale Master Lease (defined below). The Company’s primary reason for the acquisition of these facilities was to invest in healthcare and senior housing properties with an expected yield on investment as well as to diversify facility operators of its properties and reduce its dependence on Kindred for rental revenues.

12

Table of Contents

VENTAS, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

(Unaudited)

ElderTrust Merger

On February 5, 2004, the Company consummated the acquisition of all outstanding common shares of ElderTrust (“ElderTrust”) in an all cash transaction valued at $184.0 million (the “ElderTrust Transaction”). At the close of the ElderTrust Transaction, ElderTrust had approximately $33.5 million in unrestricted and restricted cash. After transaction costs, the net investment of the ElderTrust Transaction was approximately $160.0 million. The Company’s primary reason for the acquisition of all outstanding common shares of ElderTrust was to invest in healthcare and senior housing properties with an expected yield on investment as well as to diversify facility operators of its properties and reduce its dependence on Kindred for rental revenues.

The ElderTrust Transaction adds nine assisted living facilities, one independent living facility, five skilled nursing facilities, two medical office buildings and a financial office building (the “ElderTrust Properties”) to the Company’s portfolio. The ElderTrust Properties are leased by the Company to various operators under leases providing for aggregated, annual cash base rent of approximately $16.4 million, subject to escalation as provided in the leases. The leases have remaining terms primarily ranging from four to 11 years. Concurrent with the consummation of the ElderTrust Transaction, the Company also purchased all of the limited partnership units in ETOP, ElderTrust’s majority owned operating partnership, then held by third parties directly from the unitholders at $12.50 per unit, other than 31,455 Class C Units in ETOP (which will remain outstanding). ETOP owns directly or indirectly all of the ElderTrust Properties.

The Company funded the $101.0 million equity portion of the purchase price with cash on ElderTrust’s balance sheet, a portion of the $85.0 million in proceeds from its December 2003 sale of ten facilities to Kindred and draws on the Company’s revolving credit facility under the 2002 Credit Agreement. The Company’s ownership of the ElderTrust Properties is subject to approximately $82.4 million of property level debt and other liabilities.

Transactions with Brookdale

On January 29, 2004, the Company entered into 14 definitive purchase agreements with certain affiliates of Brookdale Living Communities, Inc. (“Brookdale”) to purchase a total of 14 independent living or assisted living facilities (each, a “Brookdale Facility”). The Company completed the purchase of the Brookdale Facilities (the “Brookdale Transaction”) in stages during the first quarter of 2004. The Company paid an aggregate purchase price of $115.6 million for the 14 Brookdale Facilities, $20.3 million of which was funded by the assumption of non-recourse property level debt. The property level debt encumbers five of the Brookdale Facilities. The Company’s primary reason for the acquisition of these 14 senior housing facilities was to invest in healthcare and senior housing properties with an expected yield on investment as well as to diversify facility operators of its properties and reduce its dependence on Kindred for rental revenues.

The Brookdale Facilities are leased to and are being operated by affiliates of Brookdale pursuant to a master lease (the “Brookdale Master Lease”) containing nine properties (ten including the Seasons) and five separate single facility leases, all of which are triple-net leases. The Company, at its sole option, may combine each of the single facility leases into the master lease upon the repayment of the non-recourse property level debt encumbering the applicable Brookdale Facility. All of the Brookdale leases, have an initial term of 15 years, are guaranteed by Brookdale and provide for aggregated annual cash base rent of approximately $10.6 million ($14.5 million including the Seasons), escalating each year by the greater of (i) 1.5% or (ii) 75% of the annual increase in the consumer price index.

13

Table of Contents

VENTAS, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

(Unaudited)

Acquisitions

The Second Quarter Transactions, the ElderTrust Transaction and the Brookdale Transaction were accounted for under the purchase method. The following table summarizes the preliminary estimated fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the date of acquisition (in millions). Such estimates are subject to refinement as additional valuation information is received. The Company is in the process of computing fair values, thus, the allocation of the purchase price is subject to refinement.

The buildings are being depreciated over their estimated useful lives, which were determined to be 30 years for those acquired in the ElderTrust Transaction and 35 years for those acquired in each of the Brookdale and Second Quarter Transactions.

Pro Forma

The following table illustrates the effect on net income and earnings per share if the Company had consummated the Second Quarter Transactions, the ElderTrust Transaction, the Brookdale Transaction and the Equity Offering as of the beginning of the six and three month periods ended June 30, 2004 and 2003, respectively (in thousands, except per share amounts):

14

Table of Contents

VENTAS, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

(Unaudited)

NOTE 6—BORROWING ARRANGEMENTS

The following is a summary of the Company’s debt and certain interest rate and maturity information as of June 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003 (in thousands):

15

Table of Contents

VENTAS, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

(Unaudited)

ET Sub-Woodbridge, L.P., an indirect subsidiary of the Company acquired by the Company pursuant to the ElderTrust Transaction, is the obligor under the Woodbridge Bonds. An event of default has existed under the Woodbridge Bonds since 2002. The event of default is the result of the failure of ET Sub-Woodbridge, L.P. to maintain a debt service coverage ratio of at least 1.00 on the compliance date. The Company has not received a formal waiver from the Trustee with respect to such event of default. The Company believes that the bondholders of the Woodbridge Bonds (the “Bondholders”) have the right to call the Woodbridge Bonds at any time as a result of the event of default at 103% of par. However, the Bondholders have instructed the Trustee not to take action on the event of default at this time. The next compliance date with respect to the Woodbridge Bonds is December 31, 2004, and the Company expects to continue to be in default at that time. The Woodbridge Bonds have a current outstanding principal balance of $9.4 million. The Woodbridge Bonds are prepayable on August 1, 2005 at 103% of par.

16

Table of Contents

VENTAS, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

(Unaudited)

Scheduled Maturities of Borrowing Arrangements

As of June 30, 2004, the Company’s indebtedness has the following maturities (in thousands):

NOTE 7—STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY AND STOCK OPTIONS

The Company has five plans under which options to purchase its common stock have been, or may be, granted to officers, employees, and non-employee directors and one plan under which certain directors may receive common stock of the Company in lieu of director fees. The Company accounts for its stock-based employee compensation plans under the recognition and measurement principles of APB Opinion No. 25, and related interpretations. No stock-based employee compensation cost for stock options is reflected in net income, as all options granted under those plans had an exercise price equal to the market value of the underlying common stock on the date of grant. The following table illustrates the effect on net income and earnings per share if the Company had applied the fair value recognition provisions of FASB Statement No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation,” to all stock-based employee compensation (in thousands, except per share amounts):

17

Table of Contents

VENTAS, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

(Unaudited)

In determining the estimated fair value of the Company’s stock options as of the date of grant, a Black-Scholes option pricing model was used with the following assumptions:

The Black-Scholes options valuation model was developed for use in estimating the fair value of traded options which have no vesting restrictions and are fully transferable. In addition, option valuation models require the input of highly subjective assumptions, including the expected stock price volatility. Because the Company’s employee stock options have characteristics significantly different than those of traded options, and because changes in the subjective input assumptions can materially affect the fair value estimate, in management’s opinion, the existing models do not necessarily provide a reliable single measure of the fair value of its employee stock options. See “Note 2—Basis of Presentation—Recently Issued Accounting Standards.”

NOTE 8—LITIGATION

Legal Proceedings Presently Defended and Indemnified by Kindred Under the Spin Agreements

The following litigation and other matters arose from the Company’s operations prior to the time of the 1998 Spin Off or relate to assets or liabilities transferred to Kindred in connection with the 1998 Spin Off. Under the Spin Agreements, Kindred agreed to assume the defense, on behalf of the Company, of any claims that (a) were pending at the time of the 1998 Spin Off and which arose out of the ownership or operation of the healthcare operations or any of the assets or liabilities transferred to Kindred in connection with the 1998 Spin Off, or (b) were asserted after the 1998 Spin Off and which arose out of the ownership and operation of the healthcare operations or any of the assets or liabilities transferred to Kindred in connection with the 1998 Spin Off, and to indemnify the Company for any fees, costs, expenses and liabilities arising out of such operations (the “Indemnification”). Kindred is presently defending the Company in the matters described below, among others. Under the Final Plan, Kindred assumed and agreed to abide by the Indemnification and to defend the Company in these and other matters as required under the Spin Agreements. However, there can be no assurance that Kindred will continue to defend the Company in such matters or that Kindred will have sufficient assets, income and access to financing to enable it to satisfy such obligations or its obligations incurred in connection with the 1998 Spin Off. In addition, many of the following descriptions are based primarily on information included in Kindred’s public filings and information provided to the Company by Kindred. There can be no assurance that Kindred has included in its public filings and provided the Company complete and accurate information in all instances.

A stockholder derivative suit entitled Thomas G. White on behalf of Ventas, Inc. v. W. Bruce Lunsford, et al., Case No. 98 C103669 was filed in June 1998 in the Jefferson County, Kentucky, Circuit Court. The Complaint alleges, among other things, that certain former officers and directors damaged the Company by engaging in breaches of fiduciary duty, insider trading, fraud and securities fraud and damaging the reputation of the Company. The suit seeks unspecified damages, interest, punitive damages, reasonable attorneys’ fees, other costs, and any extraordinary equitable and/or injunctive relief permitted by law or equity to assure the plaintiff has an effective remedy. The Company believes the allegations in the Complaint are without merit. On October 4, 2002, Kindred

18

Table of Contents

VENTAS, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

(Unaudited)

filed with the Court a motion to dismiss this action as to all defendants, including the Company, for lack of prosecution by the plaintiffs. On October 14, 2002, the Court granted Kindred’s motion to dismiss with prejudice. On October 17, 2002, the plaintiffs filed with the Court a motion to vacate that order of dismissal in order to allow further briefing. In response to the plaintiffs October 17, 2002 motion to vacate the order of dismissal, on August 13, 2003, the Court issued an order declining to dismiss the suit. On September 17, 2003, Kindred filed a renewed motion to dismiss this action as to all defendants, including the Company. The Court has not ruled on this motion. On March 18, 2004, the presiding judge recused himself and this action was reassigned. Kindred has indicated that it intends to continue to defend this action vigorously on behalf of the Company. There were no material developments in this action during the quarter ended June 30, 2004. The Company is unable at this time to estimate the possible loss or range of loss for this action and, therefore, no provision for liability, if any, resulting from this litigation has been made in the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements as of June 30, 2004.

A class action lawsuit entitled Sally Pratt, et al. v. Ventas, Inc. et al. was filed on May 25, 2001 in the United States District Court for the Western District of Kentucky (Civil Action No. 3-01CV-317-H). The putative class action complaint alleges that the Company and certain current and former officers and employees of the Company engaged in a fraudulent scheme to conceal the true nature and substance of the 1998 Spin Off resulting in (a) a violation of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, (b) bankruptcy fraud, (c) common law fraud, and (d) a deprivation of plaintiffs’ civil rights. The plaintiffs allege that the defendants failed to act affirmatively to explain and disclose the fact that the Company was the entity that had been known as Vencor, Inc. prior to the 1998 Spin Off and that a new separate and distinct legal entity assumed the name of Vencor, Inc. after the 1998 Spin Off. The plaintiffs contend that the defendants filed misleading documents in the plaintiffs’ state court lawsuits that were pending at the time of the 1998 Spin Off and that the defendants deceptively used the Delaware bankruptcy proceedings of Vencor, Inc. (now Kindred) to stay lawsuits against the Company. As a result of these actions, the plaintiffs maintain that they and similarly situated individuals suffered and will continue to suffer severe financial harm. The suit seeks compensatory damages (trebled with interest), actual and punitive damages, reasonable attorneys’ fees, costs and expenses, declaratory and injunctive and any and all other relief to which the plaintiffs may be entitled. Before any class of plaintiffs was certified, this action was dismissed in its entirety on February 4, 2002 because it was deemed to be an impermissible collateral attack on the Delaware Bankruptcy Court’s confirmation order. The plaintiffs thereafter filed an appeal of the District Court’s dismissal to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit. However, on plaintiffs’ motion, the appeal was stayed after the plaintiffs separately filed a motion with the Delaware Bankruptcy Court seeking, among other things, to have the Delaware Bankruptcy Court set aside portions of the releases of the Company contained in the Final Plan, as such releases might apply to the plaintiffs. On September 19, 2002, the Delaware Bankruptcy Court denied the plaintiffs’ motion. On February 28, 2003, the plaintiffs resumed their Sixth Circuit appeal. On April 20, 2004, the Sixth Circuit affirmed the District Court’s dismissal of this action.

Kindred is a party to certain legal actions and regulatory investigations arising in the normal course of its business. The Company is a party to certain legal actions and regulatory investigations that arise from the normal course of its prior healthcare operations, which legal actions and regulatory investigations are being defended by Kindred under the Indemnification. Neither the Company nor Kindred is able to predict the ultimate outcome of pending litigation and regulatory investigations. In addition, there can be no assurance that the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services or other regulatory agencies will not initiate additional investigations related to Kindred’s business or the Company’s prior healthcare business in the future, nor can there be any assurance that the resolution of any litigation or investigations, either individually or in the aggregate, would not have a material adverse effect on Kindred’s liquidity, financial position or results of operations, which in turn could have a Material Adverse Effect on the Company.

19

Table of Contents

VENTAS, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

(Unaudited)

Other Litigation

The Company is a plaintiff in an action seeking a declaratory judgment and damages entitled Ventas Realty, Limited Partnership et al. v. Black Diamond CLO 1998-1 Ltd., et al., Case No. 99C107076, filed November 22, 1999 in the Circuit Court of Jefferson County, Kentucky. Two of the three defendants in that action, Black Diamond International Funding, Ltd. and BDC Finance, LLC (collectively “Black Diamond”), have asserted counterclaims against the Company under theories of breach of contract, tortious interference with contract and abuse of process. The Company disputes the material allegations contained in Black Diamond’s counterclaims and the Company intends to continue to pursue its claims and defend the counterclaims vigorously. There were no material developments in this action during the quarter ended June 30, 2004. The Company is unable at this time to estimate the possible loss or range of loss for the counterclaims in this action, and therefore, no provision for liability, if any, resulting from this litigation has been made in the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements as of June 30, 2004.

The Company is the plaintiff in an action entitled Ventas, Inc. v. Sullivan & Cromwell, Case No. 02-5232 filed by the Company June 27, 2002 in the Superior Court of the District of Columbia. The complaint alleges damages in excess of $180.0 million based on claims of legal malpractice and breach of fiduciary duty by Sullivan & Cromwell in connection with its legal representation of the Company in the 1998 Spin-Off. The Court has denied all of Sullivan & Cromwell’s motions to dismiss the action to date. This action is in the discovery phase, and the Company anticipates a 2005 trial date. Although the Company intends to pursue its claims in this action vigorously, there can be no assurances that the Company will prevail on any of the claims in this action, or, if the Company does prevail on one or more of the claims, the amount of the recovery that may be awarded to the Company for such claims.

The Company is party to various other lawsuits arising in the normal course of the Company’s business. It is the opinion of management that, except as set forth in this Note 8, the disposition of these lawsuits will not, individually or in the aggregate, have a Material Adverse Effect on the Company. If management’s assessment of the Company’s liability with respect to these actions is incorrect, such lawsuits could have a Material Adverse Effect on the Company.

20

Table of Contents

VENTAS, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

(Unaudited)

NOTE 9—EARNINGS PER SHARE

The following table shows the amounts used in computing basic and diluted earnings per share (in thousands, except per share amounts):