Back to GetFilings.com

Table of Contents

Index to Financial Statements

U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

(Mark One)

For the fiscal year ended September 30, 2003

OR

For the transition period from              to             

Commission file number: 1-9083

TREECON RESOURCES, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (936) 634-3365

Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  ¨    No  x

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Act of 1934, as amended).    Yes  ¨    No  x.

The aggregate market value of voting stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant, based on the closing price of such stock on the last business day of the registrant’s second fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2003, was approximately $201,000. For purposes of these computations, all executive officers, directors and 10% beneficial owners of the registrant are deemed to be affiliates. Such determination should not be deemed an admission that such executive officers, directors and 10% beneficial owners are affiliates. As of July 14, 2004, the registrant had issued and outstanding 18,615,464 shares of common stock, $.01 par value.

Table of Contents

Index to Financial Statements

TREECON RESOURCES, INC.

2003 FORM 10-K ANNUAL REPORT

TABLE OF CONTENTS

i

Table of Contents

Index to Financial Statements

PART I

The nature of the Company’s operations, and the environment in which we operate, subject us to changing economic, competitive, regulatory and technological conditions, risks and uncertainties. In connection with the “safe harbor” provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, we note the following factors, which among others could cause future results to differ materially from the forward-looking statements, expectations and assumptions expressed or implied herein. Forward-looking statements contained in this document include the amount of future capital expenditures and the possible uses of proceeds from any future borrowings under our currently effective credit facilities. Factors which could cause results to differ include, but are not limited to, changes in our business environment, including actions of competitors and changes in customer preferences; changes in governmental laws and regulations, including income taxes; market demand for new and existing products; and equipment manufacturers’ and timber pricing. See also “Forward Looking Statements” and “Risk Factors Related to Our Business and Industry.”

ITEM 1. Business.

General

TreeCon Resources, Inc., formerly Overhill Corporation and formerly Polyphase Corporation (the “Company”), incorporated in 1963 and now a Nevada corporation, is a holding company that, through our subsidiaries, currently operates in two industry segments: the equipment, parts and service segment, which distributes, leases and provides financing for industrial and logging equipment and the timber and wood products segment, which includes sawmill operations and the treatment and sale of lumber products.

Our food segment, which previously had been included as a separate operating segment is classified as a discontinued operation due to the spin-off of our subsidiary, Overhill Farms, Inc. (“Overhill Farms”), to our shareholders, which was completed, with lender consent, effective October 29, 2002. The results of operations of Overhill Farms for the one month we owned them during fiscal 2003 were not significant, and are included as a discontinued operation in these financial statements.

In June 1994, we acquired all of the outstanding capital stock of Texas Timberjack from Mr. Harold Estes, current President of TTI as well as a director and major shareholder of the Company. The capital stock of TTI was acquired from Mr. Estes for consideration of approximately $4.0 million in cash, a $10.0 million promissory note payable to the order of Mr. Estes, and 100,000 shares of the Company’s Series A Preferred Stock, which were subsequently converted into 2.0 million shares of common stock. Subsequent to June 1994, the Company and Mr. Estes have modified, renewed and extended the promissory note payable to Mr. Estes on several occasions. As of September 30, 2003, the promissory note had a balance of approximately $24.3 million (including accrued and unpaid interest), which matures in October 2003 and has been renewed through October 2004.

With the exception of our note payable and accrued interest payable to Mr. Estes described above, we believe that the funds available to us from operations and existing capital resources will be adequate for our operating and capital requirements for the next twelve months. Our note payable to Mr. Harold Estes matured on October 31, 2003. Subsequent to October 31, 2003, we agreed with Mr. Estes to a further extension of the maturity date to October 31, 2004, under substantially the same terms and conditions except for a reduction of the interest rate from 9% to 5%. Interest payable to Mr. Estes as of October 31, 2003, totaling approximately $2.1 million, will be added to the principal of the refinanced note. As the collateral pledged against the note payable to Mr. Estes represents all of our ownership of our only

1

Table of Contents

Index to Financial Statements

continuing operation, Mr. Estes’ foreclosure on such collateral upon maturity or thereafter would have a material adverse effect on our ability to continue as a going concern. In the future, we intend to seek further extension of our note payable to Mr. Estes, though no assurances can be made that such extension will be granted on favorable terms and conditions, if at all. If we are not successful in obtaining an extension of the maturity date of this note payable, we do not currently expect to otherwise have the resources necessary to satisfy this obligation. Accordingly, until there is a satisfactory resolution of this uncertainty, substantial doubt exists with respect to our ability to continue as a going concern. Such substantial doubt has also been reflected in the Reports of Independent Auditors related to the Company’s financial statements for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2003 (See Item 8. “Financial Statements” and Item 16. “Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules and Reports on Form 8-K”).

In fiscal 1998, TTI acquired a majority interest in a timber and sawmill operation. In fiscal 2000, TTI acquired a non-operating refinery and assumed a note payable to Mr. Estes. In February 2003, TTI exchanged its ownership in the refinery for the remaining minority ownership in the timber and sawmill operation.

To diversify our operations, TTI became a dealer in New Holland construction equipment during fiscal 2000. We opened a TTI/New Holland dealership in Houston, Texas during fiscal 2001. However, the New Holland construction line failed to meet our profitability expectations, and the Houston store was closed during the fourth quarter of 2003. The remaining New Holland equipment inventory was returned to the manufacturer during fiscal 2003.

Disposition

In August 2001, our Board of Directors approved a plan to spin off all of the Company’s shares of Overhill Farms to the holders of our common stock. Overhill Farms, which produces high quality entrees, plated meals, meal components, soups, sauces and poultry, meat and fish specialties, previously comprised the Company’s Food Group. The transaction to effect the spin-off, expected to be tax-free, was completed on October 29, 2002 and resulted in the issuance to our stockholders, of one share of Overhill Farms common stock for every two shares of our common stock owned as of the close of business on September 30, 2002. The assets, liabilities and operations of Overhill Farms have been reported as discontinued in our consolidated financial statements.

Business Strategy

We continue to operate in a difficult market. Although sales have improved in both our operating units, margins have not improved due mostly to competitive pressures. In an effort to offset declining profit margins in our equipment operations, we have continued our efforts to reduce expenses and reduce debt. We will continue to review long-term strategies and alternatives for TTI and our subsidiaries in order to maximize shareholder value.

To achieve future growth we have identified the following basic initiatives:

2

Table of Contents

Index to Financial Statements

Operating Segments

The following table sets forth business segment information with respect to the percentage of net sales and operating income contributed by each segment for the years ended September 30, 2003, 2002 and 2001.

Reference is made to Note 18 to the Company’s consolidated financial statements for revenues, operating profits or losses and identifiable assets attributable to each industry segment for each of the last three years.

Products and Services

We, through TTI and its majority-owned subsidiaries, are a distributor of industrial and logging equipment with investments in related timber and sawmill operations. TTI has four locations in eastern Texas. TTI’s headquarters are located in Lufkin, with smaller satellite stores and repair facilities located in Jasper, Cleveland, and Atlanta, Texas. Timberjack’s Houston store was closed during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2003 due to our decision to discontinue selling construction equipment. TTI carries several lines of industrial and logging equipment, including Timberjack (an unrelated manufacturer) and Blount. TTI is involved in the sale, leasing and financing of the equipment it distributes as well as the servicing of all major brands of related equipment. TTI’s operations are primarily concentrated in the forested areas of eastern Texas although its market extends into western Louisiana. TTI operates in a fragmented industry where its major competition is from distributors and dealers of Caterpillar and John Deere equipment. TTI estimates that in eastern Texas it currently holds approximately 68% of the market for shears (machines that cut timber), 52% of the market for skidders (machines that transport logs out of the forest to a loader) and over 75% of the market for loaders (machines that stack logs onto trucks).

TTI, through its subsidiary Southern Forest Products, LLC (“SFP”), produces pine decking lumber and timbers at its sawmill in Bon Wier, Texas. SFP also treats its decking and timbers, as well as other customers’ lumber, at its treating facility in Houston, Texas. SFP’s operations are primarily concentrated in Texas, although its market extends into the Midwest and Southeast United States. SFP estimates that in Texas, it currently holds approximately 70% of the market for larger, longer length timbers and a negligible share of the market for decking.

Sales and Marketing

Timberjack currently maintains sales and distribution offices in Lufkin, Jasper, Cleveland, and Atlanta, Texas primarily to serve eastern Texas and western Louisiana. Sales are generated through repeat customers, advertisements in various trade publications and direct marketing calls on companies located in the area. A general sales manager and several branch managers supply technical and operational

3

Table of Contents

Index to Financial Statements

support, while six salesmen have direct responsibility for customer relationships. TTI meets customers’ orders for new equipment and replacement parts out of existing inventory or through purchase orders placed with the manufacturers TTI currently represents.

SFP maintains sales offices in Bon Wier and Houston, Texas, primarily to serve Texas, as well as certain parts of the Midwest and Southeast United States. Sales are generated primarily through repeat customers and marketing calls on companies throughout SFP’s market. SFP has one salesperson in Bon Wier and one salesperson in Houston, each of who have direct responsibility for customer relationships.

Approximately 35% of TTI’s revenues during fiscal 2003 were from new equipment sold to companies involved in the forestry and construction industries. Additional equipment-related revenues are derived from sales of used equipment (13%), servicing of equipment (4%), sales of parts (15%) and financing equipment sales (1%). The remaining 32% of TTI’s revenues is derived from the sale of finished timber products through its timber and sawmill operations. No single customer accounts for more than 10% of TTI’s sales. Equipment sales financed by TTI are typically for periods ranging from 12 to 24 months at interest rates ranging from 8% to 18% per annum.

Approximately 89% of SFP’s revenues during fiscal 2003 were from lumber sales and related by-product sales. The remaining 11% of revenues were from treating sales.

Backlog

As a dealer, servicer and financier of forestry equipment, TTI does not maintain a backlog of orders. Equipment ordered that is not in inventory takes approximately ninety days to be shipped from the manufacturer or another distributor.

Typically, SFP does not maintain a significant backlog of orders. Decking or timbers that are not in inventory take approximately one to two weeks to be manufactured and shipped.

Product Development

TTI does not develop products for sale to the public. TTI relies primarily upon its suppliers (Timberjack, Blount and previously New Holland) for a majority of its new units and parts.

SFP does not develop new products for sale to the public.

Competition

Competition in the forestry industry is highly fragmented in the eastern Texas and western Louisiana areas where TTI principally operates. Because of its lengthy historical presence in these regions, TTI believes it has established a strong local identity in its field with a proven record of delivering equipment on a timely basis, providing satisfactory financing and strong customer support and service. TTI is one of only a few distributors of Timberjack and Blount forestry equipment in its operating areas. TTI has the added advantage of being a leading seller and financier of various makes and models of used logging equipment. Principal competitors include local John Deere and Caterpillar distributors.

SFP’s competition in the decking market is very strong, as several mills in Texas and the Southeastern United States produce this type of lumber. However, SFP’s mill produces a high quality premium grade decking which has helped it gain market share against its competition. SFP believes it has an advantage in the pine timber market because of the relatively few sawmills in the United States that produce the same size of pine timbers, up to 40 feet in length, that SFP can produce.

4

Table of Contents

Index to Financial Statements

Patents, Trademarks and Copyrights

We do not have patents or patent applications pending on any of our products, although we may file such patent applications in the future.

Regulation

We are required to comply with various governmental regulations and requirements concerning the discharge of materials into the environment or otherwise relating to the protection of the environment. Compliance with the current applicable federal, state and local environmental regulations has not had, and we do not believe that in the future such compliance will have, a material effect on our financial position, results of operations, expenditures or competitive position.

We take all reasonable precautions to ensure that our operations and facilities operate in a safe, sanitary and environmentally sound manner. However, events beyond our control, such as the adoption by the government of more stringent environmental regulations, could adversely affect our operations. We believe that we are in substantial compliance with all applicable laws and regulations relating to the operation of our facilities.

Employees

As of September 30, 2003, we had approximately 145 full time employees at TTI and SFP. The corporate office was closed in April 2003. TTI presently provides a group health plan for its employees and pays a portion of the costs associated with the plan. TTI also maintains a profit sharing plan for its employees.

ITEM 2. Properties.

Timberjack

TTI owns three buildings in Lufkin, Texas, two buildings in Jasper, Texas and a building in Cleveland, Texas and leases a building in Atlanta, Texas. TTI’s largest building in Lufkin has 38,500 square feet, which is used for TTI’s administrative offices, showroom, parts sales and service areas. The remaining buildings have 3,600 and 4,200 square feet, respectively. The Jasper, Cleveland, and Atlanta buildings have approximately 11,000, 6,700, and 7,500 square feet, respectively, which are used for sales offices, parts sales and shop areas.

Prior to September 30, 2002, TTI leased six buildings on 68 acres in Bon Wier, Texas for its sawmill operation. The sawmill was leased at a basic rent of $19,000 per month, which included certain equipment, with an option to purchase the land, buildings and equipment. Effective September 30, 2002, TTI exercised its option to purchase the sawmill for total consideration of $856,000, represented by a promissory note in that amount issued jointly by TTI and Mr. Estes. (See Notes 9 and 14 to the Company’s consolidated financial statements.)

As of September 30, 2002, SFP, through its subsidiary Quantum Fuel and Refining, Inc. (“Quantum”), owned a non-operating crude oil refining and blending facility, together with related buildings and administrative office space, situated on approximately 120 acres of land in Egan, Louisiana. Quantum was sold in February 2003 (See Note 3 to the Company’s consolidated financial statements).

5

Table of Contents

Index to Financial Statements

Corporate Headquarters

In prior years, we leased an approximately 4,000 square foot facility located in Addison, Texas that served as our corporate headquarters. Following the spin-off of Overhill Farms, we relocated our corporate headquarters to the Texas Timberjack facilities in Lufkin, Texas.

ITEM 3. Legal Proceedings.

During fiscal 1997, five substantially identical complaints were filed in the United States District Court for the District of Nevada against the Company and certain of its officers and directors. The lawsuits each sought certification as a class action and asserted liability based on alleged misrepresentations that the plaintiffs claimed resulted in the market price of the Company’s stock being artificially inflated. The defendants filed motions to dismiss in each of the lawsuits. Without certifying the cases as class actions, the District Court consolidated several of the cases into a single action.

In March 2000, the District Court dismissed the plaintiffs’ claims against one of the Company’s officers and directors and restricted the plaintiffs from pursuing a number of their claims against the other defendants. In November 2000, the District Court granted motions for summary judgment, disposing of all of the claims asserted by the plaintiffs. The plaintiffs appealed those decisions to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.

On June 5, 2002, the Ninth Circuit rendered a decision that affirmed several of the trial court’s rulings, but reversed other rulings and remanded portions of the case for further proceedings in the District Court. On remand, the case was set for trial to commence in March 2003. In the days immediately prior to the scheduled trial date, the defendants offered to settle all claims advanced in the litigation in consideration of an aggregate payment of $13,000. In June 2003, the defendants paid $13,000 to the plaintiffs collectively, and the lawsuit was dismissed with prejudice.

The Company and its subsidiaries are involved in certain legal actions and claims arising in the ordinary course of business. However, we believe (based, in part, on advice of legal counsel) that such litigation and claims will be resolved without material effect on the Company’s financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

ITEM 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.

No matters were submitted to a vote of security holders, through the solicitation of proxies or otherwise, during the quarter ended September 30, 2003.

6

Table of Contents

Index to Financial Statements

PART II

ITEM 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters.

Prior to October 30, 2002, our common stock was listed on the American Stock Exchange and traded under the symbol “OVH.” In connection with the spin-off of Overhill Farms, we changed our name to TreeCon Resources, Inc., and trading in our common stock on the American Stock Exchange was voluntarily suspended on October 29, 2002. As of October 30, 2002, our common stock began quotation on the OTC Bulletin Board under the trading symbol “TCRS.” The following table sets forth the range of high and low sales prices for the common stock on the American Stock Exchange or the OTC Bulletin Board for the periods indicated:

We have never paid cash dividends on its common stock and do not anticipate doing so in the foreseeable future. Rather, we intend to utilize any earnings for the payment of our obligations. Such policy is subject to change based on current industry and market conditions as well as other factors beyond our control. In addition, our ability to pay dividends is restricted by the Company’s and TTI’s arrangements with their creditors.

As of May 26, 2004, we had 199 stockholders of record.

As of September 30, 2003, we did not have any outstanding options to purchase our common stock. As of September 30, 2003, 775,000 shares were available for grant under our 1994 Employee Stock Option Plan (as amended), which had previously been approved by our stockholders. Our 1994 Employee Stock Option Plan (as amended) expired following the September 30, 2003 fiscal year end.

7

Table of Contents

Index to Financial Statements

ITEM 6. Selected Financial Data

The following table sets forth selected financial data for the Company for each of the fiscal years ended September 30, 2003, 2002, 2001, 2000 and 1999. This information should be read in conjunction with Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and the Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes included elsewhere herein.

8

Table of Contents

Index to Financial Statements

ITEM 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

Statements contained in this Form 10-K that are not historical facts, including, but not limited to, any projections contained herein, are forward-looking statements and involve a number of risks and uncertainties. The actual results of the future events described in such forward-looking statements in this Form 10-K could differ materially from those stated in such forward-looking statements. Among the factors that could cause actual results to differ materially are adverse economic conditions, industry competition and other competitive factors, government regulation and possible future litigation.

Fiscal Year Ended September 30, 2003 Compared to Fiscal Year Ended September 30, 2002

Net Revenues - For the year ended September 30, 2003, our revenues increased $2,647,000 (6.8%) to $41,347,000 as compared to $38,700,000 for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2002.

Our Equipment segment’s net revenues were $28,386,000 for fiscal 2003 as compared to $27,579,000 for fiscal 2002, an increase of $807,000 (2.9%). The increase in sales was a result of a $2,229,000 increase in unit sales, which was partially offset by slight declines in parts, service, and interest income from sales contracts. The increase in unit sales was due to an improvement in the overall timber market. As a result of the war with Iraq and an improvement in the US economy, the demand for timber products – plywood, dimension lumber, and Oriented Strand Board (OSB)increased.

Timber net revenues were $12,961,000 for fiscal 2003 as compared to $11,121,000 for fiscal 2002, an increase of $1,840,000 (16.5%). As a result of improvement in our targeted timber market, SFP increased its production to meet demand, resulting in a 16.5% increase in timber revenue.

Gross Profit - For the year ended September 30, 2003, our gross profit decreased $1,719,000 to $5,766,000 as compared to $7,485,000 for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2002. Gross profit as a percentage of net revenues for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2003 was 13.9% compared to 19.3% in the prior year. This decline is due to a decline at our Equipment unit, which was offset slightly by an increase in gross profit at our Timber unit. The Equipment unit’s gross profit margin declined $1,761,000 to $3,870,000 for fiscal 2003 from $5,632,000 for fiscal 2002. During fiscal 2003, we made a decision to wholesale most of our slower moving inventory, which contributed to the decline in the Equipment unit’s gross profit margins. Competitive pressures also contributed to the decline in the Equipment Unit’s gross profit. The Timber unit’s gross profit increased slightly $43,000 to $1,896,000 for fiscal 2003 from $1,853,000 for fiscal 2002 as a result of an improvement in production efficiencies.

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses - Selling general and administrative expenses, decreased $272,000 (3.6%) to $7,335,000 in 2003 from $7,607,000 in 2002. Due to a concerted effort to reduce personnel and operating expenses, SG&A declined approximately $90,000 in the operating units during the twelve month period, when compared with the same period in 2002. In addition, parent company SG&A decreased $183,000 from the same period in 2002. The parent company decrease is primarily due to savings experienced due to the closing of the corporate office in Addison, Texas and the assignment of the investor relation function to Texas Timberjack, Inc.’s existing personnel. These savings were partially offset by legal expenses incurred in connection with the defense of our class action lawsuit during the first quarter fiscal 2003. Also, in connection with the completion of the spin-off of Overhill Farms, we provided for a $48,000 collectibility reserve against the notes receivable from Messrs. Buck and Schrader, who were directors of the Company until March, 2004. Additionally, we established a $216,000 reserve against a note receivable from an attorney who performed services for the Company and Overhill Farms, Inc.

9

Table of Contents

Index to Financial Statements

Other Expenses/Income – Total other expenses/income improved $957,000 to $1,278,000 net expense in 2003 from $2,234,000 net expense in 2002. This improvement is primarily attributable to a decrease in recorded losses of $597,000 related to Timberjack’s 49.9% investment in a construction company accounted for on the equity method. The operations of this company were substantially reduced during the latter part of fiscal 2002. See “Item 13—Certain Relationships and Related Transactions.” In addition, TTI recognized a gain on sale of timber and land of $845,000 during the third quarter of 2003. TTI purchased approximately 27,000 acres of land and timber from Louisiana Pacific Corporation for approximately $19,415,000 and sold the same property to an unrelated party on the same day. After closing costs and other expenses, TTI recorded a gain of $845,000 on this transaction. This gain was partially offset by a $213,000 net decline in the sale of other certain real estate assets from 2002 to 2003. A significant reduction in borrowings together with lower interest rates resulted in decreased interest expense to unrelated parties of $340,000. An increase in principal on the due to refinancing on the note to Mr. Estes increased interest expense by $596,000.

Income Taxes – Income tax expense (benefit) was $0 in 2003 as compared to ($271,000) in 2002. The income tax benefit in 2002 was primarily recorded as a result of utilizing net operating loss carryforwards to reduce taxable income generated by discontinued operations. In 2003, discontinued operations had a small loss, resulting in no income tax expense or benefit.

Fiscal Year Ended September 30, 2002 Compared to Fiscal Year Ended September 30, 2001

Net Revenues - - For the year ended September 30, 2002, our revenues decreased $4,596,000 (10.6%) to $38,700,000 as compared to $43,296,000 for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2001. During the current fiscal year, net revenues from our equipment segment decreased $5,013,000 from 2001 due primarily to a continued softness in the East Texas timber market. Revenues from the timber segment increased $417,000 in 2002 due primarily to increased demand for our treated timber products and higher overall production at our sawmill operation as compared to the previous fiscal year.

Gross Profit - For the year ended September 30, 2002, our gross profit decreased $415,000 to $7,485,000 as compared to $7,900,000 for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2001. Gross profit as a percentage of net revenues for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2002 was 19.3% compared to 18.2% in the prior year. The gross profit in our Equipment segment increased to 25.6% of revenues in 2002 from 20.6% in 2001, due primarily to a change in the sales mix from the lower margin sales of major units to the higher margin sales of used equipment. The gross profit in our timber segment increased to 16.6% of revenues in 2002 from 12.2% in 2001, which is primarily attributable to efficiency and productivity increases in our timber segment.

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses - Selling general and administrative expenses for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2002 decreased $411,000 (5.1%) to $7,607,000 in 2002 from $8,018,000 in 2001. This decrease is primarily attributable to a decline in salaries and wages due to personnel reductions in our equipment segment and to the discontinuance of goodwill amortization during 2002 as compared to $283,000 of goodwill amortization in fiscal 2001.

Goodwill Impairment – We adopted the provisions of SFAS No. 142, “Goodwill and Intangible Assets” effective October 1, 2001 and, accordingly, ceased amortization of goodwill. In connection with the requirements of SFAS No. 142, we performed an annual goodwill impairment test as of September 30, 2002. Primarily due to the continued softness in the East Texas forestry equipment market and the impact of an overall depressed economy, we recorded an impairment charge of $3.6 million to write-off all remaining goodwill during the fourth quarter of the fiscal year ended September 30, 2002.

10

Table of Contents

Index to Financial Statements

Other Expenses - Other expenses increased $592,000 to $2,234,000 in 2002 from $1,642,000 in 2001. This increase is primarily attributable to recorded losses of $1,013,000 related to Timberjack’s 49.9% investment in a construction company accounted for on the equity method. The operations of this company were substantially reduced during the latter part of fiscal 2002. See “Item 13--Certain Relationships and Related Transactions.” This loss was partially offset by a $379,000 decrease in interest expense due to a significant reduction in borrowings together with lower interest rates.

Income Taxes – Income tax expense (benefit) was ($271,000) in 2002 as compared to $860,000 in 2001. The income tax benefit in 2002 was primarily recorded as a result of utilizing net operating loss carryforwards to reduce taxable income generated by discontinued operations. In 2001, taxable income generated by discontinued operations was significantly higher, resulting in an offsetting income tax benefit related to continuing operations being recorded of approximately $1.3 million. However, during the fourth quarter of 2001, in connection with the planned spin-off of its Overhill Farms, Inc. subsidiary, we also recorded an additional $2.1 million valuation allowance against its net deferred tax assets, resulting in total net 2001 income tax expense from continuing operations of $860,000.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Historically, our principal sources of liquidity are cash flow from operations, cash balances and additional financing capacity. Our cash and cash equivalents increased $235,000 to $2,563,000 at September 30, 2003, compared to $2,328,000 at September 30, 2002.

Our operating activities in 2003 resulted in cash provided of $4,338,000, as compared to of cash provided of $5,657,000 in 2002. The cash provided during the current year is substantially all due to reductions in receivables and inventories, occurring as a result of the management’s continued focus on receivable collections and inventory management initiatives.

Our investing activities for the year ended September 30, 2003 resulted in cash provided of $932,000, as compared to cash provided of $2,319,000 in 2002. The cash provided in 2003 resulted primarily from proceeds from asset sales and collections of notes and other receivables, all of which were reduced by capital expenditures.

Our financing activities for the current year resulted in a use of cash of $5,036,000 in 2003, as compared to use of cash of $6,334,000 in 2002. The current year results were due primarily to our continuing use of available cash from operating and investing activities to effect significant reductions in borrowings under our various credit facilities.

In June 1994, we acquired all of the outstanding capital stock of Texas Timberjack from Mr. Harold Estes, current President of TTI as well as a director and major shareholder of the Company. The capital stock of TTI was acquired from Mr. Estes for consideration of approximately $4.0 million in cash, a $10.0 million promissory note payable to the order of Mr. Estes, and 100,000 shares of the Company’s Series A Preferred Stock, which were subsequently converted into 2.0 million shares of common stock. Subsequent to June 1994, the Company and Mr. Estes have modified, renewed and extended the promissory note payable to Mr. Estes on several occasions. As of September 30, 2003, the promissory note had a balance of $24,337,000 (principal of $22,373,000 and accrued interest of $1,964,000) and had a maturity date, as amended in October 2002, of October 31, 2003. The Company and Mr. Estes, subsequent to September 30, 2003, agreed to a further extension of the maturity date to October 31, 2004. The interest rate was reduced to 5% from 9% per annum. Subsequent to year end, the Company paid $2.4 million on the note, all of which was applied to principal.

11

Table of Contents

Index to Financial Statements

TTI and Mr. Estes, jointly and severally, have a note payable to AgriLand, PCA for $660,895, which was issued in connection with the purchase of SFP’s sawmill property and buildings. This note is payable in monthly installments of $20,103 and bears interest at a rate of 6.0% per annum. This note matures on October 1, 2006 and is collateralized by the SFP’s sawmill property and equipment.

Quantum Fuel and Refining, Inc. (“Quantum”), when acquired by SFP, had a note payable to Mr. Estes. As of September 30, 2002, the note had a total unpaid balance of $1,596,264 (principal of $1,000,000 and accrued interest of $596,264), bearing interest at 12% per annum with a maturity date of October 31, 2002, and collateralized by the assets of Quantum. In February 2003, SFP exchanged all of its ownership in Quantum, including the debt to Harold Estes, to TTI’s minority partner in SFP for his approximately 25% minority position in SFP.

At September 30, 2003, TTI had an unused $5.0 million revolving line of credit with First Bank & Trust East Texas (“FB&T”), expiring in April 2004. Borrowings under this line would bear interest at prime and be collateralized by certain assets of TTI. TTI intends to renew this arrangement prior to its expiration.

During fiscal 2003, TTI had a floor plan arrangement with New Holland Credit Corporation to finance equipment purchases. The floor plan note was paid in full during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2003, due to the decision by TTI’s management to cease acting as a New Holland equipment dealer, due to thin margins and the highly competitive construction equipment environment.

At September 30, 2002, TTI had a $1.0 million and a $1.5 million term note payable to BancorpSouth due in monthly installments of $31,000 and $67,000, respectively, including interest at 5.975% and 6.275%, respectively. These loans were paid in full during fiscal 2003.

Contractual Obligations and Commitments

The following table summarizes our contractual obligations and commitments at September 30, 2003. For additional information related to these obligations, see the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

FUTURE DEBT MATURITIES AT SEPTEMBER 30, 2003:

TTI relies on two suppliers for the majority of its new units and parts. As of September 30, 2003, TTI had commitments to purchase inventory from these suppliers amounting to $3,804,000.

TTI guarantees on behalf of various customers certain lines of credit with banks and financial institutions. The portion of the credit lines guaranteed ranges from zero to 100% on a customer-by-customer

12

Table of Contents

Index to Financial Statements

basis. At September 30, 2003, TTI’s guarantees totaled approximately $1,305,000 on total customer indebtedness of approximately $8,945,000. TTI receives a fee, in the form of interest participation, on certain of the notes upon which it is contingently liable. This fee is recognized as interest income on the accrual basis and is usually held by the institution to meet reserve requirements. Funds held in escrow by the lenders amounting to approximately $537,000 at September 30, 2003, are included in the consolidated balance sheet as restricted cash and are fully offset by our reserve for credit guarantees.

With the exception of our $24.3 million note payable and accrued interest payable to Mr. Estes, we believe that the funds available to us from operations and existing capital resources will be adequate for our operating and capital requirements for the next twelve months. Further, we intend to seek further extension of our note payable to Mr. Estes, consistent with multiple extensions successfully received over the past decade, though no assurances can be made that such extension will be granted on favorable terms and conditions, if at all. If we are not successful in obtaining an extension of the maturity date of this note payable, we do not currently expect to otherwise have the resources necessary to satisfy this obligation. Accordingly, until there is a satisfactory resolution of this uncertainty, substantial doubt exists with respect to our ability to continue as a going concern.

Critical Accounting Policies

Management’s discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based upon our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. We base our estimates and judgments on historical experience and on various other factors that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.

We believe the following critical accounting policies affect our more significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements.

Revenue Recognition. We generally recognize revenue when products are shipped, which is when title and risk of loss pass to the buyer, or when services are performed, and provide for estimated returns and allowances at the time of sale. However, a portion of our business relates to the sale of equipment through installment sales contracts. Revenue is recognized on these accounts using the installment method due to frequent late payments, periodic repossessions and related uncertainty with respect to ultimate realization at the time of sale. Under the installment method, we record at the point of sale both a sale and a cost of sale for the total cost of the unit. Gross profit is initially recorded in a deferred profit account and is recognized as proceeds are received, based on the relative percentage of transaction profit to sales price. Given the uncertainty with respect to ultimate collection, interest on installment contracts is recognized on a cash basis.

Allowance for Doubtful Receivables. We account for bad debts on accounts receivable using the reserve method. Allowances are established based on a percentage of parts sales, past bad debt experience, the makeup of the current portfolio and current market conditions. Allowances for doubtful notes receivable are established if, at the date of valuation, we believe it is probable that a loss exists in the portfolio based on an evaluation of the individual notes included in the portfolio, payment history, and the expected credit risk based on subject collateral, if any. Bad debts on sales contracts receivable are

13

Table of Contents

Index to Financial Statements

accounted for using the reserve method. After reviewing economic conditions, as well as historical trends and collateral values, we evaluate our allowance for doubtful sales contracts based on our estimated loss exposure at any given time in the portfolio, which has historically not been significant in comparison to the total portfolio amount.

Historically, our estimates of bad debts related to our various receivables have generally been adequate to cover actual losses. Uncollectible accounts written off, net of recoveries, were $1,070,600, $738,200, and $460,252 for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively. Our estimates involve a significant amount of judgment, particularly with respect to notes receivable, which are subject to various forms of collateral for which fair value is often not objectively determinable. Actual results could differ adversely from management estimates resulting in additional losses on receivables over and above the reserves provided. However, we believe our allowances for doubtful receivables are fairly stated as of September 30, 2003.

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets. When long-lived asset impairment indicators are present, we evaluate impairment of long-lived assets in accordance with SFAS No. 144 by projecting undiscounted cash flows of the related assets over the remaining estimated useful lives of such assets. If undiscounted cash flow projections are insufficient to recover the carrying value of the long-lived assets under review, impairment is recorded, if any, for the amount by which the carrying value of such assets exceeds their fair values. Projections of undiscounted cash flows inherently involve management’s subjective estimates and assumptions regarding future expected operating results. Actual results could differ from our estimates. In 2002, we recorded an approximately $160,000 impairment related to assets of our Quantum Fuel & Refining, Inc. subsidiary, which were held for sale as of September 30, 2002. No other impairments of long-lived assets were recorded by us in fiscal 2003, 2002, or 2001. In 2002, we did record an impairment of goodwill recorded as an operating expense of $3.6 million (See Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements).

Income Taxes. Deferred income taxes recorded using the liability method reflect the net tax effects of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for income tax purposes. Valuation allowances, if any, are established against deferred tax assets based upon whether or we believe such assets are more likely than not to be recovered, which is a subjective determination based upon considerations of available positive and negative evidence. As of September 30, 2003, we have recorded a valuation allowance against all our net deferred tax assets that relate to our continuing operations as we believe such amount is not likely to be recoverable given our recent history of operating losses. In making this determination, in addition to recent negative evidence of historical cumulative losses, we also considered negative evidence of no carryback period being available and no significant available tax planning strategies that can be used to generate future taxable income sufficient for recovery of our deferred tax assets.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In May 2003, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued SFAS No.150, “Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Characteristics of Liabilities and Equity,” which is effective at the beginning of the first interim period beginning after June 15, 2003. However, certain aspects of SFAS 150 have been deferred. SFAS No. 150 establishes standards for our classification of liabilities in the financial statements that have characteristics of both liabilities and equity. We will continue to review SFAS No. 150; however, we do not expect SFAS 150 to have a material impact on our financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.

In January 2003, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 46, “Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities.”

14

Table of Contents

Index to Financial Statements

Under previous practices, certain entities were included in consolidated financial statements based upon controlling voting interests or in other special situations. Under Interpretation No. 46, certain previously unconsolidated entities will be required to be included in consolidated financial statements of the primary beneficiary, as defined. For variable interest entities, often referred to as special purpose entities, created after January 31, 2003, Interpretation No. 46 is effective immediately. The adoption of FASB Interpretation No. 46 did not have a material effect on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

In December 2002, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 45, “Guarantor’s Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others.” Interpretation No. 45 clarifies the requirement for recognition of a liability by a guarantor at the inception of the guarantee, based on the fair value of a non-contingent obligation to perform. Interpretation No. 45 must be applied prospectively to guarantees entered into or modified after December 31, 2002. The adoption of FASB Interpretation No. 45 did not have a material effect on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

On July 30, 2002, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued SFAS No. 146, “Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities”, which requires companies to recognize costs associated with exit or disposal activities when they are incurred rather than at the date of commitment to an exit or disposal plan. The provisions of SFAS No. 146 are effective for exit or disposal activities that are initiated after December 31, 2002. The adoption of SFAS No. 146 did not have a material effect on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

In November 2001, the FASB issued Statement No. 144, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets” (SFAS 144). These rules supersede FASB Statement No. 121, “Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to Be Disposed Of”, providing a single accounting model for long-lived assets to be disposed of. Although retaining many of the fundamental recognition and measurement provisions of Statement 121, the new rules significantly change the criteria that would have to be met to classify an asset as held-for-sale. Statement 144 also supersedes the provisions of APB Opinion 30 with regard to reporting the effects of a disposal of a segment of a business. The Statement is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2001 and interim periods within those fiscal years, although earlier application is encouraged. We adopted SFAS 144 as of October 1, 2001 and such adoption did not have a material impact on its financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

Forward-Looking Statements

This report contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These forward-looking statements are based on current expectations or beliefs, including, but not limited to, statements concerning our operations and financial performance and condition. For this purpose, statements of historical fact may be deemed to be forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements include statements which are predictive in nature, which depend upon or refer to future events or conditions, which include words such as “expects,” “anticipates,” “intends,” “plans,” “believes,” “estimates,” or similar expressions. In addition, any statements concerning future financial performance (including future revenues, earnings or growth rates), ongoing business strategies or prospects, and possible future company actions, which may be provided by management, are also forward-looking statements. We caution that these statements by their nature involve risks and uncertainties, and actual results may differ materially depending on a variety of important factors, including, among others:

15

Table of Contents

Index to Financial Statements

Risk Factors Related to Our Business and Industry

The Company is subject to various risks which could have a negative effect on the Company and its financial condition. These risks could cause actual operating results to differ from those expressed in certain “forward looking statements” contained in this Form 10-K as well as in other Company communications. Before you invest in our securities you should carefully consider these risk factors together with all other information included in our publicly filed documents.

Logging Equipment Industry. The demand for our logging equipment products is directly related to the strength of the logging industry in East Texas. If the demand for timber declines, we will experience a decrease in product demand. A decline in demand for timber can occur due to national economic factors such as decreased construction starts or increased mortgage interest rates. A decline can also occur due to regional or local factors, such as extended bad weather or the closing of paper or saw mills that drive the East Texas logging economy.

We are the authorized distributor of Timberjack and Blount logging equipment. For continued success, we must offer equipment that is technologically advanced and competitively priced when compared to our competition. If our competitors begin to offer equipment with better, more efficient operation, we may be unable to maintain our sales volumes. Also, we must be able to meet or improve upon our competitors’ price and financing offerings.

Timber and Wood Products Industry. Our ability to maintain profitability in the highly competitive timber and wood products industry is contingent upon continued strong demand for our lumber products. If lumber prices drop, we may not be able to sell our products at a profit. Lumber prices are influenced by factors that influence the strength of the construction industry, such as housing starts, interest rates, and overall economic conditions.

Our sawmill and wood treating plant have been in operation for many years, and more efficient equipment is now available. If our equipment must be replaced or upgraded, additional capital investment will increase our depreciation expense.

16

Table of Contents

Index to Financial Statements

Overall Business. Our overall business and our reported results are affected by general economic and political conditions in the United States. This includes wars and other international conflicts and the threat thereof; actions by the United States Federal Reserve Board and other central banks, actions by the United States Securities and Exchange Commission, actions by environmental regulatory agencies, including those related to engine emissions and the risk of global warming; actions by other regulatory bodies; actions by rating agencies, capital market disruptions, investor sentiment, inflation and deflation rates, interest rate levels, customer borrowing and repayment practices, and the number of customer loan delinquencies and defaults; actions of competitors, particularly price discounting; manufacturer production and technological difficulties, changes to accounting standards, the effects of terrorism and the response thereto; and legislation affecting the sectors in which we operate.

Note Payable to Related Party. We currently owe a related party (Mr. Harold Estes) $24,336,841 for a note payable that matured October 31, 2003 and was renewed and extended subsequent to year end to October 31, 2004. As the collateral pledged against the note payable to Mr. Estes represents all of our ownership of our only continuing operation, Mr. Estes’ foreclosure on this collateral would have an adverse effect on our ability to continue as a going concern.

ITEM 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk.

Interest Rate Risk – Obligations. We are not, as of September 30, 3003, subject to interest rate risk on any variable interest rate obligations. We are subject to interest rate risk on our fixed interest rate obligations. Based upon outstanding amounts of fixed rate obligations as of September 30, 2003, a hypothetical 10% decrease in average market interest rates would not significantly increase the fair value of outstanding fixed rate debt.

Interest Rate Risk – Assets. TTI periodically makes advances under promissory notes to certain unrelated individuals and corporations, and sells equipment to individuals under installment sales contracts with terms generally from 12 to 18 months. The Company’s notes and sales contracts receivable generally have fixed interest rates ranging from 8% to 18%, depending upon the nature of the collateral, if any, and the credit worthiness of the related customer. The value of these notes is subject to market risk due to changing interest rates, although such risk is partially mitigated generally by the shorter-term nature of these receivables. Based upon outstanding amounts of notes and sales contracts receivable as of September 30, 2003, a hypothetical 10% increase in average market interest rates would decrease the fair value of these outstanding receivables by an immaterial amount.

We do not own, nor do we have an interest in any other market risk sensitive instruments. See Item 1 “Description of Business.”

ITEM 8. Financial Statements.

See Index to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 15.

17

Table of Contents

Index to Financial Statements

ITEM 9. Changes In and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure.

Langley, Williams & Company, L.L.C. (“LWC”) whose offices are located in Lake Charles, Louisiana were engaged on September 25, 2003 as the auditors of TTI for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2003.

During the two most recent fiscal years and through September 25, 2003, neither TTI nor any one on behalf of the TTI has consulted with LWC regarding (i) the application of accounting principles to any transaction, either completed or proposed, or the type of audit opinion that might be rendered on the TTI’s financial statements; or (ii) any matter that was either the subject of a disagreement, as that term is defined in Item 304(a)(1)(iv) of Regulation S-K and the related instructions to Item 304 of Regulation S-K, or a reportable event, as that term is defined in Item 304(a)(1)(v) of Regulation S-K.

LWC was engaged as of March 31, 2004 as the Registrant’s auditors for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2003. They replace Ernst & Young, LLP who, on November 10, 2003, provided a letter to the Registrant confirming the termination of the client-auditor relationship between the Registrant and Ernst & Young. LWC audited the consolidated financial statements of the Registrant and its subsidiaries for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2003.

During the two most recent fiscal years and through March 31, 2004, neither we nor any one on our behalf consulted with LWC regarding (i) the application of accounting principles to any transaction, either completed or proposed, or the type of audit opinion that might be rendered on our financial statements; or (ii) any matter that was either the subject of a disagreement, as that term is defined in Item 304(a)(1)(iv) of Regulation S-K and the related instructions to Item 304 of Regulation S-K, or a reportable event, as that term is defined in Item 304(a)(1)(v) of Regulation S-K.

ITEM 9A. Controls and Procedures.

The Company was late in filing its Form 10-Q reports for the quarters ended December 31, 2002, March 31, 2003, and June 30, 2003, and its Form 10-K report for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2003. At the time such reports were due, the Company had a different Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer. The current Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer were appointed and elected in March, 2004.

The spin-off of Overhill Farms in October 2002 and the concurrent resignation of William Shatley, the Company’s Chief Financial Officer at the time, left the Company with only its Chief Executive Officer, who remained with the Company without pay to aid in transition, two additional Board Members and no paid employees. The CEO subsequently resigned in December 2003. This shortage of personnel and the resignation of the Company’s auditors in November 2003 prevented the Company from filing the reports in a timely manner. The Company was without outside auditors until March, 2004 when Langley, Williams and Company was engaged, and at which time the Company was able to gather the information necessary to complete and file the late reports.

The information gathered included a note dated November 1, 2002 from an attorney who had performed work for Overhill Farms, Inc. and the Company. The $262,350 note is secured by an unperfected lien on 86,000 shares of Overhill Farms Inc. stock, a former subsidiary of the Company that was spun off in October 2002. The Company has written down the note to the value of the stock. In

18

Table of Contents

Index to Financial Statements

evaluating the Company’s controls and procedures, management concluded that the controls and procedures that allowed the loan evidenced by the note to be made were not adequate. Since that time the Company has implemented enhanced control measures. These measures have included instituting Board approval procedures for loans and other significant actions and increasing controls on bank accounts.

The Company also conducted an evaluation of its disclosure controls and procedures taking into account matters covered by the letter to the Audit Committee included in the Report to the Board of Directors issued by Ernst & Young, L.L.P. in connection with the audit of the Company’s financial statements for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2002. The letter stated that none of the financial accounting personnel have extensive experience with the rules and regulations of the SEC, and none of them were devoted solely to the financial reporting function. In response to the letter from Ernst & Young, L.L.P. the Company has taken the following actions and is commencing initiatives to address these issues including:

The Company will continue to evaluate the effectiveness of its controls and procedures on an ongoing basis and will implement further actions as necessary in its continuing efforts to strengthen its control process.

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

The Company’s senior management, with the participation of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and principal financial officer, evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures, as of the date of this report. Based upon that evaluation, combined with a consideration of the additional procedures described above, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and principal financial officer concluded that as of the filing date of this report the information required to be disclosed in the reports that the Company files or submits under the Exchange Act has been recorded, processed, summarized and reported as required.

Changes to Internal Control over Financial Reporting

Other than as described above, there have been no significant changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting during the period covered by this report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

19

Table of Contents

Index to Financial Statements

PART III

ITEM 10. Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant.

The following table sets forth certain information regarding the directors and executive officers of the Company as of September 30, 2003.

James Rudis was elected to the Board of Directors (the “Board”) in December 1992, served as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, beginning February 1998, and President beginning July 1997. Mr. Rudis agreed to serve in his current capacity in the transition following the spin-off of Overhill Farms, Inc. and resigned in December 2003. He also served as Executive Vice President of the Company from March 1994 until July 1997. Prior to his employment with the Company, Mr. Rudis was President of Quorum Corporation, a private consulting firm involved in acquisitions and market development. From 1970 until 1984, he held various executive positions in CIT Financial Corporation, including Vice President and Regional Manager of that company’s Commercial Finance Division.

Michael F. Buck, for the last five years, has been President of Mimatian Co., an operations and materials consulting firm. From August 1990 to August 1994, Mr. Buck served as Vice President of Bath Iron Works, Inc., a company engaged in building Aegis Class cruisers and destroyers for the United States Navy. From August 1989 to August 1990, Mr. Buck was a Vice President of Sabreliner Corporation, a company engaged in building, maintaining and overhauling executive jet aircraft. From March 1986 to August 1989, Mr. Buck was Vice President and Director of Procurement for International Telephone and Telegraph. He became a director of the Company in December 1989 and resigned March 2004.

George R. Schrader was appointed as a director in March 1994 and resigned March 2004. For the last five years, he has been a named member of Schrader & Cline, LLC, a financial and governmental management consulting firm. From 1983 to 1993, he was a principal of Schrader Investment Company, whose activities paralleled those of Schrader & Cline, LLC. Mr. Schrader’s additional experience includes ten years as City Manager for the city of Dallas, Texas and a total of nine years experience as City Manager for the Texas cities of Mesquite and Ennis.

Mr. Don Wier, age 66, was appointed a director in March, 2004. Mr. Wier was a General Agent with General American Life from 1985 to 2002. Since 2002 he has been involved in real estate development in Austin and Katy, Texas, while continuing to work in life insurance with a specialization in business and estate planning.

Significant Employees

Mr. Harold Estes, although not an executive officer of the Company, is considered to be a key employee. Mr. Estes, age 64, is the President of Texas Timberjack, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company. Mr. Estes was appointed to the Board in March 2004. He was previously elected as a director

20

Table of Contents

Index to Financial Statements

in February 1996 and resigned in April 1997. TTI is a distributor of industrial and commercial timber and logging equipment and is also engaged in certain related timber and sawmill operations. Mr. Estes has been President of TTI since 1984, when he acquired that company from Eaton Corporation.

Mr. Mike Boatman is also considered to be a key employee of the Company. Mr. Boatman, age 52, is the Vice President and Controller of Texas Timberjack, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company. TTI is a distributor of industrial and commercial timber and logging equipment and is also engaged in certain related timber and sawmill operations. Mr. Boatman joined Texas Timberjack in 1986 and was elected to the Texas Timberjack, Inc. Board of Directors in 1992. Mr. Boatman has been a Certified Public Accountant since 1991. As Vice President and Controller of Texas Timberjack, Inc., the only operating subsidiary of TreeCon Resources, Inc., Mr. Boatman previously acted as the principal financial officer of the Company. Mr. Boatman was appointed to the Board in March 2004 and also named as President and CEO at that time.

Code of Ethics

Our employee handbook has for many years included various provisions designed to assure the honest and ethical conduct of our officers and employees. However, we do not consider our employee handbook to comprise a formal code of conduct and ethics as contemplated by the Securities and Exchange Commission. We have not yet had an opportunity to prepare such a code of conduct and ethics.

However, we intend to adopt as soon as practicable one or more codes of conduct and ethics that meet the Securities and Exchange Commission requirements. Once adopted, we will make our codes of conduct and ethics and information regarding waivers or amendments to the code publicly available as required by applicable rules and regulations and will provide a copy of the codes of conduct and ethics to any person without charge, upon written request to TreeCon Resources, Inc., Attention: Investor Relations, 6004 South U.S. Highway 59, Lufkin, Texas 75901.

Meetings of the Board of Directors and its Committees

The Board of Directors did not meet in fiscal 2003 and met one time during fiscal 2002. On several occasions during each fiscal year, the Board acted by the execution of unanimous written consents in lieu of meetings.

The Board has standing Compensation and Audit Committees. The Compensation Committee is comprised of Messrs. Buck and Schrader. The Compensation Committee did not meet during fiscal 2003 or fiscal 2002. The Compensation Committee is charged with the responsibility to (i) administer the Company’s employee stock option plans and approve the granting of stock options and (ii) approve compensation for officers.

The Audit Committee is comprised of Messrs. Buck and Schrader. The Audit Committee did not meet in fiscal 2003 and met one time during fiscal 2002. The Audit Committee operates pursuant to a Charter approved by the Company’s Board of Directors. Its functions are to (i) monitor the Company’s financial reporting process and internal control system; (ii) review and appraise the audit efforts of the Company’s independent accountants; and (iii) provide an avenue of communication among the Company’s independent accountants, financial and senior management and the Board of Directors.

21

Table of Contents

Index to Financial Statements

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (“Exchange Act”), and the regulations thereunder require the directors, executive officers and persons who beneficially own more than 10% of a registered class of our equity securities (“reporting persons”) to file with the Commission initial reports of ownership and reports of changes in ownership of our common stock and other equity securities, and to furnish us with copies of all reports that they file. The following reports were not timely filed: Harold Estes, who owns more than 10% of the Company’s common stock and who was appointed a director of the Company in March 2003, did not timely file two Form 4s reporting two sale transactions and one purchase of common stock by his wife.

ITEM 11. Executive Compensation.

The following table sets forth for fiscal 2003, 2002 and 2001 compensation awarded or paid to Mr. James Rudis, the Company’s Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and other significant employees Mr. Harold Estes, President of Texas Timberjack, Inc. and Mr. Mike Boatman, Vice President and Controller of Texas Timberjack, Inc. and acting as principal financial officer of TreeCon Resources, Inc. Other than as indicated in the table below, no executive officer of the Company or Texas Timberjack, Inc. received salary plus bonus in excess of $100,000 for the year ended September 30, 2003.

Summary Compensation Table

22

Table of Contents

Index to Financial Statements

Compensation Committee Report on Executive Compensation

The Board of Directors has established a Compensation Committee to review and approve the compensation levels of executive officers of our Company, evaluate the performance of the executive officers and consider senior management succession issues and any related matters our Company. The Compensation Committee is charged with reviewing with the Board of Directors in detail all aspects of cash compensation for the executive officers our Company. Stock option compensation for the executive officers is also considered by the Compensation Committee.

The philosophy of the Company’s compensation program is to employ, retain and reward executives capable of leading the Company in achieving its business objectives. These objectives include achieving a strong financial posture, increasing the assets of our Company, positioning our assets and business operations in geographic markets and industry segments offering long term growth opportunities, enhancing shareholder value and ensuring the survival of our Company. The accomplishment of these objectives is measured against conditions prevalent in the industries within which we operate. In recent years these conditions reflect a highly competitive market environment and rapidly changing regional, geographic and overall industry market conditions.

The available forms of executive compensation include base salary, cash bonus awards and incentive stock options. Performance of our Company is a key consideration (to the extent that such performance can fairly by attributed or related to such executive’s performance), as well as the nature of each executive’s responsibilities and capabilities. Our Company’s compensation policy recognizes, however, that stock price performance is only one measure of performance and, given industry business conditions and the long term strategic direction and goals of our Company, it may not necessarily be the best current measure of executive performance. Therefore, our Company’s compensation policy also gives consideration to our Company’s achievement of specified business objectives when determining executive officer compensation. Compensation paid to executive officers is based upon a Company-wide salary structure consistent for each position relative to its authority and responsibility compared to industry peers.

Due to the impending spin-off of Overhill Farms and the fact that all compensation for Mr. Rudis to be paid in 2003 was subject to review and approval by the Overhill Farms Board of Directors, the Compensation Committee took no action with respect to Mr. Rudis’ compensation for fiscal 2003.

23

Table of Contents

Index to Financial Statements

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

No member of the Compensation Committee was an officer or employee of the Company or any of its subsidiaries or had any relationship requiring disclosure pursuant to Item 404 of Commission Regulation S-K. No executive officer of the Company served as a member of a compensation committee of another corporation (or other board committee of such company performing similar functions or, in the absence of any such committee, the entire board of directors of such corporation), one of whose executive officers served on the Compensation Committee. No executive officer of the Company served as a director of another corporation, one of whose executive officers served on the Compensation Committee. No executive officer of the Company served as a member of a compensation committee of another corporation (or other board committee of such corporation performing similar functions or, in the absence of any such committee, the entire board of directors), one of whose executive officers served as a director of the Company.

Director Compensation

Directors who are also employees of the Company receive no additional compensation for services as directors. Nonemployee directors receive an annual fee of $8,500, with additional fees of $2,500 and $1,500 for service on the Audit Committee and Compensation Committee, respectively, plus additional fees of $500 to $750 per Board and Committee meeting attended. Directors are also reimbursed for all expenses incident to their service on the Board of Directors.

During March 1998, Mr. Michael F. Buck and Mr. George R. Schrader were granted options to purchase 30,000 and 50,000 shares, respectively, of Common Stock, exercisable at $0.75 per share (the fair market value at the date of grant) in whole or in part, expiring in March 2008. During the year ended September 30, 2001, the exercise price of options covering 60,000 shares (30,000 shares for Mr. Buck and 30,000 shares for Mr. Schrader), which had been granted in 1996, was reduced to $.75 per share from $2.00 per share.

Common Stock Performance Table

The following performance table compares the five-year cumulative return of the Common Stock with that of a Broad Market Index (American Stock Exchange) and a Published Industry Index (MG Industry Group 342 - Food and Beverage - Processed and Packaged Goods). Each index assumes $100 invested at September 30, 1998, and is calculated assuming quarterly reinvestment of dividends and quarterly weighting by market capitalization. For the periods following the spin-off of Overhill Farms, the Company will utilize a new Published Industry Index (MG Industry Group 752 – Industrial Equipment Wholesale) to reflect the Timberjack business.

Comparative Five-Year Total Returns

TreeCon Resources, Inc., Broad Market and Peer Group

(Performance Results Through 9/30/03)

24

Table of Contents

Index to Financial Statements

<Donnelly to add revised amounts for years indicated and open>.

<Need to add 2003 and delete 1997; 1998 should be new basis>

<MT says Donnelly can do this for us>

ITEM 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management.

The following table sets forth information regarding the beneficial ownership of Common Stock as of June 15, 2004 by each person or group who owned, to the Company’s knowledge, more than five percent of the Common Stock, each of the Company’s directors, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, certain significant employees and all of the Company’s directors and executive officers as a group.

ITEM 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions.

Notes Payable and Accrued Interest to Related Party

In connection with the acquisition of TTI in June 1994, we initially issued a note to the seller (Mr. Harold Estes, President of TTI) in the amount of $10.0 million, with interest at 8% due October 31, 1994 and collateralized by all the capital stock and certain assets of TTI. As of each maturity date thereafter, Mr. Estes has entered into subsequent agreements with us to modify and extend the term of the note. As of September 30, 2003, the note had a total unpaid balance of $24,337,000 (principal of $22,373,000 and

25

Table of Contents

Index to Financial Statements

accrued interest of $1,964,000), bearing interest at 9% per annum with a maturity date of October 31, 2003. The Company and Mr. Estes, subsequent to September 30, 2003, agreed to a further extension of the maturity date to October 31, 2004. The interest rate was reduced to 5% from 9% per annum.

Quantum Fuel and Refining, Inc. (“Quantum”), when acquired by SFP, had a note payable to Mr. Estes. As of September 30, 2002, the note had a total unpaid balance of $1,596,264 (principal of $1,000,000 and accrued interest of $596,264), bearing interest at 12% per annum with a maturity date of October 31, 2002, and collateralized by the assets of Quantum. In February 2003, SFP exchanged all of its ownership in Quantum to TTI’s minority partner in SFP for the approximate 25% minority position in SFP. Prior to the transaction, as of September 30, 2002, an impairment loss of $160,000 was recorded to reduce the carrying value of the assets held for sale.

Advances to Related Parties

In September 2000, SFP acquired all of the outstanding common stock of Quantum Fuel & Refining, Inc. (“Quantum”), a nonoperating refinery located in Egan, Louisiana, from a related party for $400,000 in timber products plus the assumption of certain liabilities. In February 2003, SFP sold all of its interest in Quantum, including debt to Harold Estes, back to the same related party and received as consideration the related party’s 24.95% minority interest ownership in SFP, which then became a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company.

The father of TTI’s former 25% minority partner in SFP is a former officer of SFP. As of September 30, 2003 and 2002, the Company had total receivables of $337,000 and $683,000, respectively, from this former officer of SFP or from companies owned or controlled by such former officer. The Company’s receivables from the former officer, as of September 30, 2003, consisted of an unsecured note receivable of $153,000 from the former officer and an unsecured note receivable of $184,000 from a company owned by the aforementioned former officer.

During the fiscal years ended September 30, 2003, 2002 and 2001, TTI recorded sales of approximately $0, $0 and $517,000, respectively, to Tony Currie Construction, LLC, a 49.9% owned limited liability company, which is accounted for under the equity method. Additionally, during the fiscal years ended September 30, 2003, 2002 and 2001, TTI recorded income from the sale of equipment to and interest income on receivables from Tony Currie Construction, LLC, of $0, $0 and $94,000, respectively.

The Company has an ownership interest in two unconsolidated real estate partnerships. In prior years the Company has guaranteed the debt of these partnerships, which was collateralized by assets of the partnerships. At September 30, 2003, no guarantees were in effect for these partnership debts.

In connection with the purchase of TTI, TTI acquired a note receivable from an officer of TTI. The note has been renewed and extended each year since issuance, is currently due in 2007 and is collateralized by marketable securities. As of September 30, 2003 and 2002, the balance outstanding was $338,000 and $374,533, respectively, and the note has been classified as a noncurrent related party receivable. Unsecured receivables from other employees totaled $125,800 and $77,900 at September 30, 2003 and 2002.

Other assets include an insurance premium receivable from Mr. Harold Estes representing insurance premiums paid by TTI on his behalf. As of September 30, 2003 and 2002, the insurance premium receivable was approximately $600,000.

TTI and Harold Estes, President of TTI and a significant stockholder of the Company, jointly and

26

Table of Contents

Index to Financial Statements

severally, have a note payable to AgriLand, PCA for $661,000 related to the purchase of the SFP sawmill property and buildings. The note is payable in monthly installments of $20,103, and bears interest at a rate of 6.0%. This note matures on October 1, 2006 and is collateralized by the SFP sawmill property.

During the year ended September 30, 2001, the exercise price of options granted in 1996 under the Company’s 1994 Employee Stock Option Plan (the “Plan”) to purchase an aggregate 290,000 shares of the Company’s common stock was reduced to $0.75 per share from $2.00 per share. Of these options,

No compensation expense was recorded in connection with these repricings, as the options were repriced above fair market value. All of these repriced options were exercised in September 2001.

In addition to the repriced options, Mr. Buck and Mr. Schrader also exercised options to purchase 30,000 and 50,000 shares of the Company’s common stock, respectively, granted under the Plan in 1998; and Mr. Rudis and Mr. Shatley each also exercised options to purchase 146,500 shares which were granted under individual option plans in 1993. These option exercises by each of Mr. Rudis, Mr. Buck, Mr. Schrader and Mr. Shatley in September 2001 were exercised with the issuances of 2-year promissory notes to the Company in an aggregate amount of $497,250, bearing interest at 3.82% and collateralized by the shares issued. The outstanding principal amounts of the notes were, at September 30, 2002:

In connection with the spin-off in October 2002, the Company assigned the notes receivable from Messrs. Rudis and Shatley, having an aggregate principal balance of $392,250, to Overhill Farms, Inc. Also related to the spin-off was a substantial decrease in the trading price of the Company’s common stock, the sole collateral on the notes receivable from Messrs. Buck and Schrader. As a result of management’s evaluation of the subject collateral and the recourse provisions of the subject notes, the Company provided a collectibility reserve against the remaining notes receivable from Messrs. Buck and Schrader in the aggregate principal amount of $105,000. (See Note 11 to the consolidated financial statements.)

27

Table of Contents

Index to Financial Statements

ITEM 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services

Audit and Non-Audit Fees

The following table presents billings for fees for professional audit services rendered by Ernst & Young LLP for the audits of our annual financial statements for fiscal year 2001 and 2002, and fees billed for other services rendered by Ernst & Young LLP:

Fees for audit services include fees associated with the annual audit and the reviews of our quarterly reports on Form 10-Q and annual report on Form 10-K. Audit-related fees principally included payments for services in connection with the registration statement for the Overhill Farms, Inc. spinoff. Tax fees included tax compliance, tax advice and tax planning.

28

Table of Contents

Index to Financial Statements

PART IV

ITEM 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules and Reports on Form 8-K.

(a) Financial Statements and Financial Statement Schedules.

All other schedules for which provision is made in the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission are not required under the related instructions or are inapplicable and therefore have been omitted.

29

Table of Contents

Index to Financial Statements

30

Table of Contents

Index to Financial Statements

(b) Reports on Form 8-K

No reports on Form 8-K were filed by the Registrant during the last quarter of the fiscal year ended September 30, 2003.

31

Table of Contents

Index to Financial Statements

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized in the City of Lufkin, the state of Texas, on July 22, 2004.

In accordance with the Exchange Act, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the date indicated.

32

Table of Contents

Index to Financial Statements

TREECON RESOURCES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

F-1

Table of Contents

Index to Financial Statements

Report of Independent Auditors

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of

TreeCon Resources, Inc.

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of TreeCon Resources, Inc. and subsidiaries as of September 30, 2003, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity and cash flows for year ended September 30, 2003. Our audit also includes the 2003 financial statement schedules listed in the Index at Item 15(a). These financial statements and schedules are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and schedules based on our audit. The 2002 and 2001 financial statements were audited by other auditors whose report dated June 20, 2003 on those statements included an explanatory paragraph describing conditions that raised substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of TreeCon Resources, Inc. and subsidiaries at September 30, 2003, and the consolidated results of their operations and their cash flows for the year ended September 30, 2003 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. Also, in our opinion, the related financial statement schedules, when considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole, present fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein.

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that TreeCon Resources, Inc. will continue as a going concern. As more fully described in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company has a note payable and accrued interest payable to a related party, which matures October 31, 2004, and may not have sufficient assets or access to capital necessary to satisfy such obligation. This condition raises substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. Management’s plans in regard to this matter are also described in Note 1. The financial statements do not include any adjustments to reflect the possible future effects on the recoverability and classification of assets or the amounts and classification of liabilities that may result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

As discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, in 2002 the Company changed its method of accounting for goodwill.

/s/ Langley, Williams & Co., L.L.C.

Lake Charles, Louisiana

May 12, 2004

F-2

Table of Contents

Index to Financial Statements

Report of Independent Auditors

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of

TreeCon Resources, Inc.

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of TreeCon Resources, Inc. and subsidiaries as of September 30, 2002, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the two years in the period ended September 30, 2002. Our audits also include the financial statement schedules as of and for the periods ended September 30, 2002 listed in the Index at Item 15(a). These financial statements and schedules are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and schedules based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of TreeCon Resources, Inc. and subsidiaries at September 30, 2002, and the consolidated results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the two years in the period ended September 30, 2002 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. Also, in our opinion, the related financial statement schedules as of and for the periods ended September 30, 2002, when considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole, present fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein.

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that TreeCon Resources, Inc. will continue as a going concern. As more fully described in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company has a note payable and accrued interest payable to a related party, which matures October 31, 2003, and may not have sufficient assets or access to capital necessary to satisfy such obligation. This condition raises substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. Management’s plans in regard to this matter are also described in Note 1. The financial statements do not include any adjustments to reflect the possible future effects on the recoverability and classification of assets or the amounts and classification of liabilities that may result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

As discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, in 2002 the Company changed its method of accounting for goodwill.

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

June 20, 2003

Dallas, Texas

F-3

Table of Contents

Index to Financial Statements

TREECON RESOURCES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

Assets

The accompanying notes are an integral part

of these consolidated financial statements.

F-4

Table of Contents

Index to Financial Statements

TREECON RESOURCES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity

The accompanying notes are an integral part

of these consolidated financial statements.

F-5

Table of Contents

Index to Financial Statements

TREECON RESOURCES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

The accompanying notes are an integral part

of these consolidated financial statements.

F-6

Table of Contents

Index to Financial Statements

TREECON RESOURCES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

The accompanying notes are an integral part

of these consolidated financial statements.

F-7

Table of Contents

Index to Financial Statements

TREECON RESOURCES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

FOR THE THREE YEARS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2003