UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
x | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended March 27, 2004
or
¨ | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission File Number: 0-18281
Hologic, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware | 04-2902449 | |
(State of incorporation) | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) | |
35 Crosby Drive, Bedford, Massachusetts | 01730 | |
(Address of principal executive offices) | (Zip Code) |
(781) 999-7300
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 12 b-2). Yes x No ¨
As of May 6, 2004, 20,390,953 shares of the registrants Common Stock, $.01 par value, were outstanding.
HOLOGIC, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
INDEX
Page | ||
PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION |
||
Item 1. Financial Statements |
||
Consolidated Balance Sheets March 27, 2004 (unaudited) and September 27, 2003 |
3 | |
4 | ||
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows Six Months Ended March 27, 2004 and March 29, 2003 (unaudited) |
5 | |
6 | ||
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
12 | |
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk |
19 | |
20 | ||
21 | ||
21 | ||
22 | ||
23 | ||
EXHIBITS |
2
HOLOGIC, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except per share data)
March 27, 2004 |
September 27, 2003 |
|||||||
ASSETS | ||||||||
CURRENT ASSETS: |
||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 56,133 | $ | 45,177 | ||||
Accounts receivable, less reserves of $2,968 and $3,477, respectively |
42,309 | 43,831 | ||||||
Inventories |
42,404 | 43,426 | ||||||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
10,041 | 9,554 | ||||||
Total current assets |
150,887 | 141,988 | ||||||
PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT, at cost: |
||||||||
Land |
1,500 | 1,500 | ||||||
Buildings and improvements |
13,621 | 13,607 | ||||||
Equipment |
35,165 | 33,505 | ||||||
Furniture and fixtures |
3,694 | 3,660 | ||||||
Leasehold improvements |
2,676 | 2,637 | ||||||
56,656 | 54,909 | |||||||
Less: Accumulated depreciation and amortization |
24,683 | 22,803 | ||||||
31,973 | 32,106 | |||||||
INTANGIBLE ASSETS: |
||||||||
Patented technology, net of accumulated amortization of $6,219 and $5,732, respectively |
1,262 | 1,702 | ||||||
Developed technology and know-how, net of accumulated amortization of $3,860 and $3,405, respectively |
5,882 | 6,338 | ||||||
Goodwill |
6,285 | 5,810 | ||||||
13,429 | 13,850 | |||||||
Other assets |
492 | 659 | ||||||
Total assets |
$ | 196,781 | $ | 188,603 | ||||
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY | ||||||||
March 27, 2004 |
September 27, 2003 |
|||||||
CURRENT LIABILITIES: |
||||||||
Current portion of note payable |
$ | 982 | $ | 480 | ||||
Accounts payable |
9,451 | 10,819 | ||||||
Accrued expenses |
18,113 | 17,387 | ||||||
Deferred revenue |
11,855 | 9,440 | ||||||
Total current liabilities |
40,401 | 38,126 | ||||||
Note payable, net of current portion |
708 | 1,550 | ||||||
Commitments and Contingencies (Notes 8 and 9) |
||||||||
STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY: |
||||||||
Preferred stock, $.01 par value - Authorized 1,623 shares Issued 0 shares |
| | ||||||
Common stock, $.01 par value Authorized - 30,000 shares Issued 20,359 and 19,966 shares, respectively |
204 | 200 | ||||||
Capital in excess of par value |
147,421 | 144,455 | ||||||
Retained earnings |
9,660 | 6,032 | ||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
(1,149 | ) | (1,296 | ) | ||||
Treasury stock, at cost - 45 shares |
(464 | ) | (464 | ) | ||||
Total stockholders equity |
155,672 | 148,927 | ||||||
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
$ | 196,781 | $ | 188,603 | ||||
See accompanying notes.
3
HOLOGIC, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except per share data)
Three Months Ended |
Six Months Ended |
|||||||||||||||
March 27, 2004 |
March 29, 2003 |
March 27, 2004 |
March 29, 2003 |
|||||||||||||
Revenues: |
||||||||||||||||
Product sales |
$ | 43,056 | $ | 39,155 | $ | 81,612 | $ | 76,928 | ||||||||
Service and other revenue |
12,592 | 11,142 | 23,919 | 22,371 | ||||||||||||
55,648 | 50,297 | 105,531 | 99,299 | |||||||||||||
Costs and Expenses: |
||||||||||||||||
Cost of product sales |
23,052 | 21,362 | 42,927 | 41,951 | ||||||||||||
Cost of service and other revenue |
12,005 | 10,623 | 22,590 | 21,241 | ||||||||||||
Research and development |
4,117 | 4,891 | 8,153 | 9,652 | ||||||||||||
Selling and marketing |
7,850 | 6,943 | 16,881 | 15,823 | ||||||||||||
General and administrative |
5,778 | 6,174 | 11,073 | 11,351 | ||||||||||||
52,802 | 49,993 | 101,624 | 100,018 | |||||||||||||
Income (loss) from operations |
2,846 | 304 | 3,907 | (719 | ) | |||||||||||
Interest income |
116 | 243 | 224 | 419 | ||||||||||||
Interest/other expense |
(267 | ) | (151 | ) | (358 | ) | (176 | ) | ||||||||
Income (loss) before provision for income taxes & cumulative effect of change in accounting principle |
2,695 | 396 | 3,773 | (476 | ) | |||||||||||
Provision for income taxes |
106 | 52 | 144 | 54 | ||||||||||||
Income (loss) before cumulative effect of change in accounting principle |
2,589 | 344 | 3,629 | (530 | ) | |||||||||||
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle |
| | | (207 | ) | |||||||||||
Net income (loss) |
$ | 2,589 | $ | 344 | $ | 3,629 | $ | (737 | ) | |||||||
Basic income (loss) per common and common equivalent share: |
||||||||||||||||
Income (loss) before cumulative effect of change in accounting principle |
$ | 0.13 | $ | 0.02 | $ | 0.18 | $ | (0.03 | ) | |||||||
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle |
| | | (0.01 | ) | |||||||||||
Net income (loss) |
$ | 0.13 | $ | 0.02 | $ | 0.18 | $ | (0.04 | ) | |||||||
Diluted income (loss) per common and common equivalent share: |
||||||||||||||||
Income (loss) before cumulative effect of change in account principle |
$ | 0.12 | $ | 0.02 | $ | 0.17 | $ | (0.03 | ) | |||||||
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle |
| | | (0.01 | ) | |||||||||||
Net income (loss) |
$ | 0.12 | $ | 0.02 | $ | 0.17 | $ | (0.04 | ) | |||||||
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding: |
||||||||||||||||
Basic |
20,211 | 19,580 | 20,095 | 19,528 | ||||||||||||
Diluted |
21,293 | 20,035 | 21,095 | 19,528 | ||||||||||||
See accompanying notes.
4
HOLOGIC, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
(In thousands)
Six Months Ended |
||||||||
March 27, 2004 |
March 29, 2003 |
|||||||
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES: |
||||||||
Net income (loss) |
$ | 3,629 | $ | (737 | ) | |||
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities- |
||||||||
Depreciation |
2,862 | 2,560 | ||||||
Amortization |
943 | 1,137 | ||||||
Non cash interest expense |
61 | 110 | ||||||
Changes in assets and liabilities- |
||||||||
Accounts receivable |
1,608 | (2,544 | ) | |||||
Inventories |
1,166 | (7,176 | ) | |||||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
(466 | ) | (671 | ) | ||||
Accounts payable |
(1,539 | ) | (76 | ) | ||||
Accrued expenses |
660 | (1,798 | ) | |||||
Deferred revenue |
2,372 | (814 | ) | |||||
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities |
11,296 | (10,009 | ) | |||||
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES: |
||||||||
Net cash paid for acquisition of distributor |
(341 | ) | | |||||
Purchases of property and equipment, net |
(2,692 | ) | (5,285 | ) | ||||
Decrease (increase) in other assets |
59 | (53 | ) | |||||
Net cash used in investing activities |
(2,974 | ) | (5,338 | ) | ||||
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES: |
||||||||
Repayment of note payable |
(340 | ) | (442 | ) | ||||
Net proceeds from sale of common stock |
3,002 | 1,219 | ||||||
Net cash provided by financing activities |
2,662 | 777 | ||||||
EFFECT OF EXCHANGE RATE CHANGES ON CASH |
(28 | ) | 155 | |||||
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS |
10,956 | (14,415 | ) | |||||
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, beginning of period |
45,177 | 45,836 | ||||||
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, end of period |
$ | 56,133 | $ | 31,421 | ||||
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION: |
||||||||
Cash paid during the period for income taxes |
$ | 95 | $ | 43 | ||||
Cash paid during the period for interest |
$ | 52 | $ | 85 | ||||
NET CASH PAID FOR ACQUISITION: |
||||||||
Fair value of assets acquired |
$ | | $ | | ||||
Costs in excess of net assets of distributor acquired |
475 | | ||||||
Liabilities assumed |
(134 | ) | | |||||
Cash paid for acquisition |
341 | | ||||||
Less: cash acquired |
| | ||||||
Net cash paid for acquisition |
$ | 341 | $ | | ||||
See accompanying notes.
5
HOLOGIC, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except per share data)
(1) Basis of Presentation
The consolidated financial statements of Hologic, Inc. (the Company) presented herein have been prepared pursuant to the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission for quarterly reports on Form 10-Q and do not include all of the information and note disclosures required by generally accepted accounting principles. These statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto for the year ended September 27, 2003, included in the Companys Form 10-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 23, 2003.
The consolidated balance sheet as of March 27, 2004, the consolidated statements of operations for the three months and six months ended March 27, 2004 and March 29, 2003 and the consolidated statements of cash flows for the six months ended March 27, 2004 and March 29, 2003, are unaudited but, in the opinion of management, include all adjustments (consisting of normal, recurring adjustments) necessary for a fair presentation of results for these interim periods.
The results of operations for the three months and six months ended March 27, 2004 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the entire fiscal year ending September 25, 2004. Certain prior-period amounts have been reclassified to conform with the current-period presentation.
(2) Inventories
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost (first-in, first-out) or market and consist of the following:
March 27, 2004 |
September 27, 2003 | |||||
Raw materials and work-in-process |
$ | 33,730 | $ | 33,596 | ||
Finished goods |
8,674 | 9,830 | ||||
$ | 42,404 | $ | 43,426 | |||
Work-in-process and finished goods inventories consist of material, labor and manufacturing overhead.
(3) Net Income (Loss) Per Share
A reconciliation of basic and diluted share amounts are as follows:
Three Months Ended |
Six Months Ended | |||||||
March 27, 2004 |
March 29, 2003 |
March 27, 2004 |
March 29, 2003 | |||||
Basic weighted average common shares outstanding |
20,211 | 19,580 | 20,095 | 19,528 | ||||
Weighted average common equivalent shares |
1,082 | 455 | 1,000 | | ||||
Diluted weighted average common shares outstanding |
21,293 | 20,035 | 21,095 | 19,528 | ||||
6
Diluted net loss per share for the six months ended March 29, 2003 is computed in the same way as basic, as all common equivalent shares are considered antidilutive due to the Companys net loss position. Diluted weighted average shares outstanding do not include options outstanding to purchase 673 and 692 common-equivalent shares for the three and six months ended March 27, 2004, respectively, and 1,691 and 3,503 common-equivalent shares for the three and six months ended March 29, 2003, respectively, as their effect would have been antidilutive.
(4) Stock Based Compensation
The Company applies the intrinsic value method per Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, and related interpretations, in accounting for its stock-based compensation plans. Accordingly, no compensation expense has been recognized for stock-based compensation plans other than for restricted stock. The Company has adopted the disclosure-only provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 148, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation-Transition and Disclosure, an amendment of Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Statement No. 123, therefore, no compensation expense was recognized for the Companys stock option plans. Had compensation expense for the Companys stock option plans been determined based on the fair value at the grant date for awards under these plans, consistent with the methodology prescribed under SFAS No.148 the Companys net income (loss) and net income (loss) per share would have approximated the pro forma amounts indicated below:
Three Months Ended |
Six Months Ended |
|||||||||||||||
March 27, 2004 |
March 29, 2003 |
March 27, 2004 |
March 29, 2003 |
|||||||||||||
Net income (loss), as reported |
$ | 2,589 | $ | 344 | $ | 3,629 | $ | (737 | ) | |||||||
Deduct: Total stock-based employee compensation expense determined under fair value - based method for all awards, net of related tax effects |
(855 | ) | (758 | ) | (1,617 | ) | $ | (1,711 | ) | |||||||
Pro forma net income (loss) |
$ | 1,734 | $ | (414 | ) | $ | 2,012 | $ | (2,448 | ) | ||||||
Net income (loss) per share: |
||||||||||||||||
Basic as reported |
$ | 0.13 | $ | 0.02 | $ | 0.18 | $ | (0.04 | ) | |||||||
Basic pro forma |
$ | 0.09 | $ | (0.02 | ) | $ | 0.10 | $ | (0.13 | ) | ||||||
Diluted as reported |
$ | 0.12 | $ | 0.02 | $ | 0.17 | $ | (0.04 | ) | |||||||
Diluted pro forma |
$ | 0.08 | $ | (0.02 | ) | $ | 0.10 | $ | (0.13 | ) | ||||||
7
The weighted average fair value of each stock option included in the preceding pro forma amounts was estimated using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model and is amortized over the vesting period of the underlying options. The assumptions used to calculate the SFAS No.123 pro forma disclosure and the weighted average information are as follows:
Three Months Ended |
Six Months Ended | |||||||
March 27, 2004 |
March 29, 2003 |
March 27, 2004 |
March 29, 2003 | |||||
Risk free interest rate |
2.57% | 2.49% | 2.66% | 2.57% | ||||
Expected dividend yield |
| | | | ||||
Expected lives |
4 years | 4 years | 4 years | 4 years | ||||
Expected volatility |
70% | 70% | 70% | 70% |
(5) Concentrations of Credit Risk
The Company historically utilized a distributor in the United States for certain product lines. In the first quarter of fiscal 2003, this distributor sold one of its wholly owned subsidiaries to another company creating a new distributor for the Companys mammography systems. On January 1, 2003, the Company terminated its relationship with this new distributor and commenced a direct sales effort in the U.S. for the product lines carried by this distributor. The Company had accounts receivable from the new distributor of approximately $415 and $937 as of March 27, 2004 and September 27, 2003, respectively, and accounts receivable from the historical distributor of approximately $2,454 and $3,118 as of March 27, 2004 and September 27, 2003, respectively. The new distributor accounted for 11% and 5% of revenues for the three months and six months ended March 29, 2003, respectively. The historical distributor accounted for 6% of product revenues for the three months ended March 27, 2004 and March 29, 2003 and 7% and 15% of revenues for the six months ended March 27, 2004 and March 29, 2003, respectively. There were no other customers with balances greater than 10% of accounts receivable as of March 27, 2004 or September 27, 2003 and no other customers with greater than 10% of the Companys revenues for the first six months of fiscal 2004 or fiscal 2003.
(6) Comprehensive Income (Loss)
SFAS No. 130, Reporting Comprehensive Income, established standards for reporting and display of comprehensive income and its components in the financial statements. The Companys only item of other comprehensive income (loss) relates to foreign currency translation adjustments, and is presented separately on the balance sheet as required.
A reconciliation of comprehensive income (loss) is as follows:
Three Months Ended |
Six Months Ended |
|||||||||||||
March 27, 2004 |
March 29, 2003 |
March 27, 2004 |
March 29, 2003 |
|||||||||||
Net income (loss), as reported |
$ | 2,589 | $ | 344 | $ | 3,629 | $ | (737 | ) | |||||
Foreign currency translation adjustment |
(139 | ) | 448 | 147 | 343 | |||||||||
Comprehensive income (loss) |
$ | 2,450 | $ | 792 | $ | 3,776 | $ | (394 | ) | |||||
(7) Business Segments and Geographic Information
As a result of the Companys decision to phase out its digital general radiography systems and to focus on supplying its digital detectors to other original equipment manufacturers, as well as the current trends in the markets in which the Company competes, the Company revised its segment reporting, effective as of the beginning of the
8
current fiscal year. The Companys businesses are now reported as four segments: osteoporosis assessment; mammography; digital detectors and other. Prior periods have been reclassified to conform to this presentation. Intersegment sales and transfers are not significant. Segment information for the three months and six months ended March 27, 2004 and March 29, 2003 is as follows:
Three Months Ended |
Six Months Ended |
|||||||||||||||
March 27, 2004 |
March 29, 2003 |
March 27, 2004 |
March 29, 2003 |
|||||||||||||
Total revenues |
||||||||||||||||
Osteoporosis Assessment |
$ | 16,550 | $ | 18,446 | $ | 33,105 | $ | 35,085 | ||||||||
Mammography |
27,861 | 19,843 | 50,349 | 41,642 | ||||||||||||
Digital Detectors |
2,984 | 2,235 | 4,702 | 3,404 | ||||||||||||
Other |
8,253 | 9,773 | 17,375 | 19,168 | ||||||||||||
$ | 55,648 | $ | 50,297 | $ | 105,531 | $ | 99,299 | |||||||||
Operating income (loss) |
||||||||||||||||
Osteoporosis Assessment |
$ | 1,883 | $ | 3,019 | $ | 3,474 | $ | 4,756 | ||||||||
Mammography |
2,026 | (97 | ) | 2,423 | 672 | |||||||||||
Digital Detectors |
(1,310 | ) | (1,122 | ) | (2,893 | ) | (3,140 | ) | ||||||||
Other |
247 | (1,496 | ) | 903 | (3,007 | ) | ||||||||||
$ | 2,846 | $ | 304 | $ | 3,907 | $ | (719 | ) | ||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
||||||||||||||||
Osteoporosis Assessment |
$ | 742 | $ | 858 | $ | 1,566 | $ | 1,490 | ||||||||
Mammography |
453 | 624 | 1,112 | 1,198 | ||||||||||||
Digital Detectors |
547 | 427 | 912 | 770 | ||||||||||||
Other |
103 | 119 | 215 | 239 | ||||||||||||
$ | 1,845 | $ | 2,028 | $ | 3,805 | $ | 3,697 | |||||||||
Capital expenditures |
||||||||||||||||
Osteoporosis Assessment |
$ | 662 | $ | 1,395 | $ | 1,645 | $ | 2,396 | ||||||||
Mammography |
167 | 527 | 447 | 1,187 | ||||||||||||
Digital Detectors |
445 | 938 | 600 | 1,702 | ||||||||||||
Other |
| | | | ||||||||||||
$ | 1,274 | $ | 2,860 | $ | 2,692 | $ | 5,285 | |||||||||
Three Months Ended | ||||||
March 27, 2004 |
September 27, 2003 | |||||
Identifiable assets |
||||||
Osteoporosis Assessment |
$ | 10,295 | $ | 9,939 | ||
Mammography |
16,007 | 16,810 | ||||
Digital Detectors |
5,238 | 4,991 | ||||
Other |
10,864 | 11,687 | ||||
Corporate |
154,377 | 145,176 | ||||
$ | 196,781 | $ | 188,603 | |||
Export sales from the United States to unaffiliated customers primarily in Europe, Asia and Latin America during the three months and six months ended March 27, 2004 totaled approximately $19,665 and $33,879 respectively, and for the three months and six months ended March 29, 2003 totaled approximately $15,616 and $24,499, respectively.
Transfers between the Company and its European subsidiaries are generally recorded at amounts similar to the prices paid by unaffiliated foreign dealers. All intercompany profit is eliminated in consolidation.
9
Export product sales as a percentage of total product sales are as follows:
Three Months Ended |
Six Months Ended |
|||||||||||
March 27, 2004 |
March 29, 2003 |
March 27, 2004 |
March 29, 2003 |
|||||||||
Europe |
19 | % | 20 | % | 19 | % | 17 | % | ||||
Asia |
13 | 17 | 11 | 12 | ||||||||
Latin America |
12 | 2 | 10 | 2 | ||||||||
All others |
2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||||||
46 | % | 40 | % | 41 | % | 32 | % | |||||
(8) Litigation
In the ordinary course of business, the Company is party to various types of litigation. In the Companys opinion, all litigation currently pending or threatened are not reasonably likely to have a material effect on the Companys financial position or results of operations.
(9) Product Warranties
The Company typically offers a one-year warranty for all of its products. The Company provides for the estimated cost of product warranties at the time product revenue is recognized. Factors that affect the Companys warranty reserves include the number of units sold, historical and anticipated rates of warranty repairs and the cost per repair. The Company periodically assesses the adequacy of the warranty reserve and adjusts the amount as necessary.
Product warranty activity for the six months ended March 27, 2004 is as follows (in thousands):
Balance at September 27, 2003 |
Accruals for warranties issued during the period |
Decrease to preexisting warranties |
Balance at March 27, 2004 | |||||||
$ 4,475 |
$ | 2,704 | $ | (2,967 | ) | $ | 4,212 |
(10) Receivable from Officer
In fiscal 2000 and 2001, the Company loaned an officer an aggregate of $500, which is required to be repaid quarterly through April 2006. In the event of a change in control, as defined, the amounts outstanding will be forgiven. The note is unsecured and bears interest at 7% per annum. In December 2002, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors approved a special bonus program to provide the officer with the funds necessary to pay the quarterly installments due under the loan. Under the special bonus program, for so long as the officer remains an officer of the Company and there are amounts remaining to be repaid under the loan, the Company will pay the officer a special quarterly bonus equal to the amount due under the loan, including interest due, plus an additional payment equal to the taxes due as a result of the special bonus and such additional payment, such that the net-after-tax special quarterly bonus to be received by the officer will equal the principal and interest then due under the loan. During the six months ended March 27, 2004 the Company recognized $157 in bonus expense under the special bonus program related to this note.
10
(11) Adoption of EITF 00-21 and Cumulative Effect of a Change in Accounting Principle
In the fourth quarter of 2003, the Company adopted EITF 00-21, Revenue Arrangements with Multiple Deliverables, as a cumulative effect adjustment of a change in accounting principle, accordingly, the revenue representing the fair value of services not performed at the time of product shipment such as installation and training are deferred and recognized as performed. Additionally, revenue related to installation and training activities have been classified as service and other revenue. All prior periods presented have been reclassified to conform with the current-period presentation.
(12) Acquisition of Belgian Distributor
In October 2003 the Company acquired the mammography distribution rights for Belgium and Luxembourg from the Companys Belgian distributor in exchange for $341,000 in cash and the assumption of certain service liabilities totaling $134,000. The Company also purchased spare parts and computers for an additional $79,000.
(13) Goodwill | and Intangible Assets |
Effective September 30, 2001, the Company early adopted the provisions of SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets. This statement affects the Companys treatment of goodwill and other intangible assets. The statement requires that goodwill existing at the date of adoption be reviewed for possible impairment and that impairment tests be periodically repeated, with impaired assets written down to fair value. Additionally, existing goodwill and intangible assets must be assessed and classified within the Statements criteria. Intangible assets with finite useful lives will continue to be amortized over those periods. Amortization of goodwill and intangible assets with indeterminable lives ceased.
Consistent with prior years, the Company conducted its annual impairment test of goodwill during the quarter ended March 27, 2004. The Company determined that it met all of the criteria under SFAS No. 142 to carry-forward the prior year determination of reporting unit fair value and based on the applicable valuation determined that no impairment exists.
Goodwill by reporting segment consists of the following:
Reporting Segment |
Balance as of March 27, 2004 |
Balance as of September 27, 2003 | ||||
Mammography |
$ | 6,285 | $ | 5,810 | ||
11
Intangible assets consist of the following:
As of March 27, 2004 |
As of September 27, 2003 | |||||||||||||||
Reporting Segment |
Description |
Estimated Useful Life |
Gross Carrying Value |
Accumulated Amortization |
Gross Carrying Value |
Accumulated Amortization | ||||||||||
Osteoporosis Assessment |
Patents | 1-20 years | $ | 4,953 | $ | 4,311 | $ | 4,952 | $ | 4,239 | ||||||
Mammography |
Developed Technology |
10 years | 9,743 | 3,861 | 9,743 | 3,405 | ||||||||||
Digital Detectors |
Patents | 5 years | 528 | 273 | 482 | 223 | ||||||||||
Other |
Patents | 4 years | 2,000 | 1,635 | 2,000 | 1,270 |
The estimated remaining amortization expense for each of the five succeeding fiscal years:
September 25, 2004 |
$ | 943 | |
September 30, 2005 |
1,132 | ||
September 29, 2006 |
1,108 | ||
September 28, 2007 |
1,075 | ||
September 26, 2008 |
1,019 |
(14) Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In March 2004, the FASB issued the Exposure Draft, Share-Based Payment. The proposed statement would require all equity-based awards to employees to be recognized in the income statement based on their fair value. The final standard is expected in late 2004. Based on the current proposed effective date, which is for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2004, the Company will be required to adopt this statement for fiscal 2006.
PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION (Continued)
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
HOLOGIC, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CAUTIONARY STATEMENT
This report contains forward-looking information that involves risks and uncertainties, including statements regarding our plans, objectives, expectations and intentions. Such statements include, without limitation, statements regarding various estimates we have made in preparing our financial statements, statements regarding our expectations relating to increased digital mammography sales and our geographical mix of sales, as well as statements regarding expected future trends relating to our results of operations and the sufficiency of our capital
12
resources. These forward-looking statements are subject to known and unknown risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those anticipated. Factors that could cause actual results to materially differ include, without limitation, manufacturing risks that may limit our ability to ramp-up commercial production of the Selenia and other of our digital products, including our reliance on a single source of supply for some key components of our products as well as the need to comply with especially high standards for those components and in the manufacture of digital X-ray products in general; uncertainties inherent in the development of new products and the enhancement of existing products, including technical and regulatory risks, cost overruns and delays; the risk that newly introduced products may contain undetected errors or defects or otherwise not perform as anticipated; our ability to predict accurately the demand for our products and to develop strategies to address our markets successfully; risks associated with, and additional funding that may be required to pursue, acquisitions or strategic transactions; the early stage of market development for digital X-ray products; our ability to expand our direct sales and service team for both the near and longer-term to effectively implement our direct sales strategy; risks relating to compliance with financial covenants under our working capital financing and leases; technical innovations that could render products marketed or under development by us obsolete; competition; and reimbursement policies for the use of our products. Other factors that could adversely affect our business and prospects are described in our filings with Securities and Exchange Commission. We caution readers not to place undue reliance upon any such forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date of this report. Except as otherwise required by law, we expressly disclaim any obligation or undertaking to release publicly any updates or revisions to any such statements to reflect any change in our expectations or any change in events, conditions or circumstances on which any such statement is based.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES
The discussion and analysis of our consolidated financial condition and results of operations are based upon our interim consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S. The preparation of these consolidated financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. On an on-going basis, we evaluate our estimates, including those related to customer programs and incentives, product returns, bad debts, inventories, investments, intangible assets, income taxes, warranty obligations, restructuring and contingencies and litigation. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources.
The critical accounting estimates used in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements that we believe affect our more significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements presented in this report are described in our Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 27, 2003. There have been no material changes to the critical accounting estimates.
Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. Any differences may have a material impact on our financial condition and results of operations. For a discussion of how these and other factors may affect our business, see the Cautionary Statement above and Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations Risk Factors in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 27, 2003.
OVERVIEW
We are engaged in the development, manufacture and distribution of proprietary X-ray, digital X-ray and other medical imaging systems. Our businesses are reported as four segments: osteoporosis assessment; mammography; digital detectors and other.
13
Our osteoporosis assessment products primarily consist of dual-energy X-ray bone densitometry systems and, to a lesser extent, an ultrasound-based osteoporosis assessment product. Bone densitometry is the precise measurement of bone density to assist in the diagnosis and monitoring of osteoporosis and other metabolic bone diseases that can lead to debilitating bone fractures. Our mammography products include a broad product line of breast imaging products, including film-based and digital mammography systems and breast biopsy systems. Our digital detector products are a digital component for original equipment manufacturers to incorporate into their own equipment. Our other business segment includes our mini C-arm, conventional general radiography service and digital general radiography systems businesses. Our mini C-arm products are low intensity, real-time mini C-arm X-ray systems used primarily for minimally invasive surgery on a patients extremities. In January 2002, we closed the manufacturing facility for the conventional general radiography products, however, we continue to service and support most of these product lines. We have decided to phase out our digital general radiography systems and to focus on supplying our digital detectors to other original equipment manufacturers.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Total Revenues. Total revenues for the second quarter of fiscal 2004 increased 11% to $55.6 million from $50.3 million for the second quarter of fiscal 2003. Total revenues for the current six-month period increased 6% to $105.5 million from $99.3 million for the first six months of fiscal 2003. These increases were primarily due to an increase in revenues of our digital mammography products (Selenia). Partially offsetting these increases was a decrease in our analog mammography, osteoporosis assessment and digital general radiography product sales. Total revenues for the second quarter of fiscal 2004 increased 12% from $49.9 million for the immediately preceding quarter which ended December 27, 2003. This increase was primarily due to increases in unit sales of our digital and analog mammography products.
Product Sales. Product sales increased 10% to $43.1 million for the second quarter of fiscal 2004 from $39.2 million for the second quarter of fiscal 2003. Total product sales for the current six month period increased 6% to $81.6 million from $76.9 million for the corresponding period in fiscal 2003.
Mammography product sales increased approximately 43% to $22.6 million in the second quarter of fiscal 2004 from $15.8 million for the corresponding period in fiscal 2003, and increased 22% to $40.8 million for the six months ended March 27, 2004 from $33.5 million for the corresponding period in fiscal 2003. These increases were primarily due to an increase in the number of digital mammography systems sold worldwide and, to a lesser extent, multicare stereotactic tables sold in the United States. Our digital mammography system was introduced in the first quarter of fiscal 2003 and since its introduction sales have steadily increased. These increases were partially offset by fewer analog mammography systems sold primarily in the United States. We expect that analog mammography sales as a percentage of total mammography product sales will continue to decline as sales of the higher priced digital mammography product continues to increase.
Osteoporosis assessment product sales decreased 8% to $12.5 million in the second quarter of fiscal 2004 from $13.6 million in the second quarter of fiscal 2003 and decreased by 3% to $24.9 million for the first six months of fiscal 2004 compared to $25.7 million for the corresponding period in fiscal 2003. These decreases were primarily due to a decrease in the number of systems sold in the United States which was partially offset by incremental sales of lower-end systems sold abroad.
Digital detector product sales increased 17% to $2.3 million in the second quarter of fiscal 2004 from $1.9 million for the corresponding period in fiscal 2003, and increased 30% to $3.8 million for the first six months of fiscal 2004 compared to $2.9 million for the corresponding period in fiscal 2003. This increase in the current quarter was primarily attributable to an increase in the number of digital detectors sold in Europe partially offset by a decrease in the number of detectors sold in Asia. The increase in the current six month period was primarily due to an increase in the number of digital detectors sold in Europe, and, to a lesser extent in the United States, partially offset by a decrease in the number of detectors sold in Asia.
14
Other product sales decreased 27% to $5.7 million in the second quarter of fiscal 2004 from $7.8 million in the second quarter of fiscal 2003 and decreased 18% to $12.2 million for the first six months of fiscal 2004 compared to $14.9 million for the corresponding period in fiscal 2003. These decreases were primarily due to a decrease in the number of digital general radiography systems sold worldwide. As a result of our decision to phase out our digital general radiography systems and to focus on supplying our digital detectors to other original equipment manufacturers, we expect our product sales for our digital general radiography systems to be negligible by the end of the fiscal year. In the current quarter and six months ended March 27, 2004, sales of digital general radiography systems accounted for $2.1 million and $5.3 million of other product revenues, respectively.
In the first six months of fiscal 2004, approximately 59% of product sales were generated in the United States, 19% in Europe, 11% in Asia, 10% in Latin America and 1% in other international markets. In the first six months of fiscal 2003, approximately 68% of product sales were generated in the United States, 17% in Europe, 12% in Asia, 2% in Latin America and 1% in other international markets. We believe the shift in sales to Europe and other international markets is primarily due to the timing of an increase in demand from those territories. The increase in sales in Latin America was primarily attributable to the fullfilment of a large order for our Selenia digital mammography systems to satisfy a tender. Absent this tender, we believe sales of Selenia would have shifted to other territories in the current period. We do not expect that sales to Latin America will remain at this level for the remainder of the year, but rather return to historical 2003 levels.
Service and Other Revenue. Service and other revenue is primarily comprised of revenue generated from our field service organization to provide ongoing service, installation and repair of our products. Service and other revenue increased 13% to $12.6 million in the second quarter of fiscal 2004 compared to $11.1 million in the second quarter of fiscal 2003. Service and other revenue for the current six month period increased 7% to $23.9 million from $22.4 million for the corresponding period in fiscal 2003. These increases in service and other revenue in fiscal 2004 were primarily due to an increase in service contract revenues, billable service repair activities and parts revenues compared to the same period in fiscal 2003.
Costs of Product Sales. The cost of product sales decreased as a percentage of product sales to 54% in the second quarter of fiscal 2004 from 55% in the second quarter of fiscal 2003. The cost of product sales decreased as a percentage of product sales to 53% in the current six month period from 55% in the first six months of fiscal 2003. These costs decreased as a percentage of product sales primarily due to increased revenues and improved gross margins recognized on the shift in mammography product sales to Selenia, our full field digital mammography system which has significantly higher selling prices more than offsetting the higher costs of the product when compared to analog mammography.
Costs of Service and Other Revenue. Cost of service and other revenue increased 13% to $12 million, 95% of service and other revenue, in the second quarter of fiscal 2004 from $10.6 million, 95% of service and other revenue in the second quarter of fiscal 2003. Cost of service and other revenue increased 6% to $22.6 million, 94% of service and other revenue, in the first six months of fiscal 2004 from $21.2 million, 95% of service and other revenue, in the first six months of fiscal 2003. These increases, in absolute dollars, are primarily related to additional personnel and other costs to expand our service capabilities, especially in the United States, as we continue to assume direct coverage of territories previously assigned to distributors and to support our growing installed base of products and increased warranty costs in our digital detector business. We expect our costs of service and other revenue to remain relatively high as a percentage of service and other revenue, reflecting our need to employ the required personnel for warranty, non-warranty and installation activities to service our growing installed base of products. We also expect an increase in customers entering into service agreements in connection with our transition to digital mammography and direct service coverage.
Research and Development Expenses. Research and development expenses decreased 16% to $4.1 million, 7% of total revenues, in the second quarter of fiscal 2004 from $4.9 million, 10% of total revenues, in the second quarter of fiscal 2003. Research and development expenses decreased 16% to $8.2 million, 8% of total revenues, in the first six months of fiscal 2004 from $9.7 million, 10% of total revenues, in the first six months of fiscal 2003.
15
These decreases were primarily due to a decrease in research and development spending and personnel primarily related to our phase-out of the digital general radiography systems product line announced in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2003.
Selling and Marketing Expenses. Selling and marketing expenses increased 13% to $7.9 million, 14% of total revenues, in the second quarter of fiscal 2004 from $6.9 million, 14% of total revenues, in the second quarter of fiscal 2003. For the current six month period, selling and marketing expenses increased 7% to $16.9 million, 16% of total revenues, from $15.8 million, 16% of total revenues, in the first six months of fiscal 2003. These increases were primarily due to higher international commissions related to the sale of Selenias to satisfy the tender in Latin America and, to a lesser extent, higher trade show expenses. Partially offsetting these increases were lower commissions in the United States as a result of our transition to direct sales of mammography products in the United States.
General and Administrative. General and administrative expenses decreased 6% to $5.8 million, 10% of total revenues, in the second quarter of fiscal 2004 compared to $6.2 million, 12% of total revenues, in the second quarter of fiscal 2003. During the first six months of fiscal 2004, general and administrative expenses decreased 2% to $11.1 million, 10% of total revenues, from $11.4 million, 11% of total revenues in the first six months of fiscal 2003. These decreases were primarily due to a decrease in the bad debt reserve as a result of strong cash collections and a decrease in legal expenses.
Interest Income. Interest income decreased to $116,000 in the current quarter from $243,000 in the second quarter of fiscal 2003 and decreased to $224,000 in the current six month period from $419,000 in the comparable period in fiscal 2003. These decreases were primarily due to a decrease in the interest rate earned in fiscal 2004 compared to last year, partially offset by higher investment balances.
Interest / Other Expense. In the second quarters of fiscal 2004 and 2003, we incurred interest and other expenses of approximately $267,000 and $151,000, respectively. For the first six months of fiscal 2004 and 2003, we incurred interest and other expenses of $358,000 and $176,000, respectively. In the current quarter and first six months of fiscal 2004, these costs were primarily due to foreign currency transaction losses and interest costs on the Wells Fargo Foothill, Inc. note payable. For the first six months of fiscal 2003, these expenses were primarily due to the interest costs on the Wells Fargo Foothill, Inc. note payable. To the extent that foreign currency exchange rates fluctuate in the future, we may be exposed to continued financial risk. Although we have established a borrowing line of credit denominated in the foreign currency, the euro, in which our subsidiaries currently conduct business to minimize this risk, we cannot assure that we will be successful or can fully hedge our outstanding exposure.
Provision for Income Taxes. We account for income taxes under SFAS No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes. This statement requires that we recognize a current tax liability or asset for current taxes payable or refundable and a deferred tax liability or asset for the estimated future tax effects of temporary differences and carryforwards to the extent they are realizable. We record a valuation allowance to reduce our deferred tax assets to the amount that is more likely than not to be realized. While we have considered future taxable income and ongoing prudent and feasible tax planning strategies in assessing the need for the valuation allowance, in the event we were to determine that we would be able to realize our deferred tax assets in the future in excess of the net recorded amount, an adjustment to the deferred tax asset would increase income in the period such determination was made. Likewise, should we determine that we would not be able to realize all or part of our net deferred tax asset in the future, an adjustment to the deferred tax asset would be charged to income in the period such determination was made. We have provided for a nominal effective tax rate for fiscal 2004 and certain minimum taxes where net operating losses cannot be used during the first six months of fiscal 2004 and 2003.
Cumulative Effect of Change in Accounting Principle. We recognize product revenue upon the completion of installation for shipments that require more than perfunctory obligations at the time of shipment, specifically our digital imaging systems. During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2003, we adopted EITF 00-21, Accounting for Revenue Arrangements with Multiple Deliverables, as a cumulative effect of a change in accounting
16
principle in accordance with APB 20, Accounting Changes, in fiscal 2003. In accordance with EITF 00-21 certain services including installation and training are deemed to be separate units of accounting requiring such services to be accounted for separately from product revenue. We have reviewed the terms and conditions of our revenue arrangements and determined that these services can be accounted for separately from the product element as our products have value to our customers on a standalone basis and we have objective and reliable evidence of the fair value of the services. In accordance with EITF 00-21, revenues for the product portion of multiple element sales arrangements will continue to be recorded upon shipment based on the relative fair value of the product on a standalone basis. In connection with the adoption of EITF 00-21, we recorded a cumulative effect adjustment of $207 in the first quarter of fiscal 2003 and reclassified $1.0 million and $2.1 million of product revenue to service revenue for the three months and six months ended March 29, 2003.
Segment Results of Operations
As a result of our decision to phase out our digital general radiography systems and to focus on supplying our digital detectors to other original equipment manufacturers, as well as the current trends in the markets in which we compete, we have revised our segment reporting. Our businesses are now reported as four segments: osteoporosis assessment; mammography; digital detectors and other. Prior periods have been restated to conform to this presentation. The accounting policies of the segments are the same as those described in the footnotes to the accompanying consolidated financial statements included in our 2003 Annual Report on Form 10-K. We measure segment performance based on total revenues and operating income or loss. Revenues from each of these segments are described above. The discussion that follows is a summary analysis of revenues and the primary changes in operating income or loss by segment.
Osteoporosis Assessment. Osteoporosis assessment revenues decreased 10% to $16.6 million for the second quarter of fiscal 2004, compared to $18.4 million for the same period in fiscal 2003 and decreased 6% to $33.1 million for the first six months of fiscal 2004 compared to $35.1 million for the comparable period in fiscal 2003. These decreases were primarily due to a decrease in service revenue, a decrease in revenues from a shift in sales of densitometers to international markets at a lower selling price than the U.S. market and a decrease in the number of Sahara ultrasound units sold. In the second quarter of fiscal 2004 we began selling our Explorer bone densitometer, our new lower priced system for international markets. Operating income for osteoporosis assessment was $1.9 million and $3.5 million for the three and six months ended March 27, 2004 compared to operating income of $3.0 million and $4.8 million for the same periods in fiscal 2003. The decrease in operating income for this business segment was primarily due to decreased gross margins from the decreases in product and service revenues, the lower selling prices on the shift to international sales and an increased allocation of operating expenses previously absorbed by the digital general radiography systems business, which is being phased out. Partially offsetting these decreases in operating income was reduced commissions expense related to the product revenue decrease.
Mammography. Mammography revenues increased 40% to $27.9 million for the second quarter of fiscal 2004 from $19.8 million for the same period in fiscal 2003 and increased 21% to $50.3 million for the first six months of fiscal 2004 compared to $41.6 million for the comparable period in fiscal 2003. These increases were primarily due to an increase in the number of digital mammography systems sold worldwide and to a lesser extent, multicare stereotactic tables sold in the United States and an increase in service revenues. These increases were partially offset by fewer analog mammography systems sold, primarily in the United States. Operating income for this business segment was $2.0 million in the second quarter of fiscal 2004 compared to an operating loss of $97,000 in the corresponding quarter of fiscal 2003. For the six months ended March 27, 2004, operating income was $2.4 million compared to $672,000 for the first six months of fiscal 2003. These increases in operating income were primarily due to the increased revenues and the additional gross margin from the shift in product revenues to our more profitable Selenia full field digital mammography systems from our analog mammography systems. Partially offsetting this increase was additional international commissions related to a multiple unit Selenia sale in Latin America in both of the first two quarters of fiscal 2004 and an increased allocation of operating expenses previously absorbed by the digital general radiography business.
17
Digital Detectors. Digital detector revenues increased 34% to $3.0 million for the second quarter of fiscal 2004 from $2.2 million for the same period in fiscal 2003 and increased 38% to $4.7 million for the first six months of fiscal 2004 compared to $3.4 million for the corresponding period in fiscal 2003. These increases were primarily attributable to the increased number of digital detectors sold. The digital detector business operating loss increased 17% to $1.3 million in the second quarter of fiscal 2004 from $1.1 million in the second quarter of fiscal 2003. For the six months ended March 27, 2004, the operating loss for this segment decreased 8% to $2.9 million from $3.1 million for the comparable period in fiscal 2003. The increase in the operating loss in the current quarter was primarily due to increased warranty expenses partially offset by improved gross profits from an increase in product sales. The decrease in the operating loss in the current six month period was primarily due to improved gross profits from an increase in product sales and, to a lesser extent, a decrease in research and development spending related to our digital detector development for Selenia partially offset by increased warranty expenses.
Other. Other revenues for this business segment, which includes the mini C-arm business, the digital general radiography business and the conventional general radiography service business decreased 16% to $8.3 million for the second quarter of fiscal 2004 from $9.8 million for the same period in fiscal 2003 and decreased 9% to $17.4 million for the first six months of fiscal 2004 compared to $19.2 million for the corresponding period in fiscal 2003. These decreases were primarily attributable to a decrease in the number of digital general radiography systems sold. Operating income was $247,000 in the second quarter of fiscal 2004 compared to an operating loss of $1.5 million in the second quarter of fiscal 2003. For the six months ended March 27, 2004, operating income was $902,000 compared to an operating loss of $3.0 million for the comparable period in fiscal 2003. These improvements in operating income were primarily due to lower operating expenses as a result of our decision to de-emphasize the digital general radiography systems business, which is being phased out and reallocate resources and costs in order to focus on the more profitable and faster growing digital mammography systems.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
At March 27, 2004 we had approximately $110.5 million of working capital. At that date our cash and cash equivalents totaled $56.1 million. Our cash and cash equivalents balance increased approximately $11.0 million during the first six months of fiscal 2004 primarily due to cash provided by operating activities and, to a lesser extent, financing activities partially offset by purchases of property and equipment.
In the first six months of fiscal 2004 operating activities provided us with $11.3 million of cash. Our cash provided by operating activities reflected net income of $3.6 million for the first six months of fiscal 2004 plus non-cash charges for depreciation and amortization of $3.8 million and an increase of $3.8 million from changes in our current assets and liabilities. Cash provided by operations due to changes in our current assets and liabilities included an increase in deferred revenue of $2.4 million, a decrease in accounts receivable of $1.6 million and a decrease in inventory of $1.2 million that were partially offset by a decrease in accounts payable of $1.5 million. The increase in deferred revenue was primarily due to an increase in the number of deferred service contracts and an increase in customer deposits. The decrease in accounts receivable was primarily due to the collection of a multiple unit Selenia sale during the second quarter of fiscal 2004. The decrease in inventory was primarily the result of improved supply chain management. The decrease in accounts payable was primarily due to timing of payments.
In the first six months of fiscal 2004, we used approximately $3.0 million of cash in investing activities. This use of cash was primarily attributable to purchases of property and equipment which consisted primarily of computer hardware, demonstration equipment and manufacturing equipment.
In the first six months of fiscal 2004, financing activities provided us with $2.7 million of cash. These cash flows included approximately $3.0 million from the sale of our Common Stock upon exercise of stock options, partially offset by $340,000 of repayments of our notes payable.
As of March 27, 2004 we had short term borrowings of $982,000 and long term notes payable totaling
18
$708,000. The short term borrowings represent the current portion of our long term note payable to Wells Fargo Foothill, Inc. of $480,000 and the $502,000 balance due on the note to Fleet in connection with the settlement of the Fleet litigation. The Fleet note bears interest at Fleets prime rate plus 1% with the full amount of principal to be paid on August 10, 2004. The long term note payable represents the long term portion of our term loan under our credit facility with Wells Fargo Foothill, Inc.
In September 2001 we obtained a secured loan from Wells Fargo Foothill, Inc. This loan agreement provides for a term loan of approximately $2.4 million, which we borrowed at signing, and a revolving line of credit facility. The maximum amount we can borrow under the loan agreement and amendments is $20.0 million. The loan agreement and amendments contain financial and other covenants and the actual amount which we can borrow under the line of credit at any time is based upon a formula tied to the amount of our qualifying accounts receivable. In July 2003 we amended this loan agreement primarily to simplify financial covenants and to reduce the fees related to this facility. The term loan accrues interest at prime plus 1.0% for five years. The line of credit advances accrue interest at a prime plus 0.25%. The line of credit expires in September 2005. We were in compliance with all covenants as of March 27, 2004.
We maintain an unsecured line of credit with a European bank for the equivalent of $3.0 million, which bears interest at the Europe Interbank Offered Rate (2.13% at September 27, 2003) plus 1.5%. The borrowings under this line are primarily used by our European subsidiaries to settle intercompany sales and are denominated in the respective local currencies of its European subsidiaries. The line of credit may be canceled by the bank with 30 days notice. At March 27, 2004 and September 27, 2003, there were no outstanding borrowings under this line.
In September 2002, we completed a sale/leaseback transaction for our headquarters and manufacturing facility located in Bedford, Massachusetts and our Lorad manufacturing facility in Danbury, Connecticut. The transaction resulted in net proceeds to us of $31.4 million. The new lease for these facilities, including the associated land, has a term of 20 years, with four five-year renewal terms, which we may exercise at our option. The basic rent for the facilities is $3.2 million per year, which is subject to adjustment for increases in the consumer price index. The aggregate total minimum lease payments during the initial 20-year term are $62.9 million. In addition, we are required to maintain the facilities during the term of the lease and to pay all taxes, insurance, utilities and other costs associated with those facilities. Under the lease, we make customary representations and warranties and agree to certain financial covenants and indemnities. In the event we default on the lease, the landlord may terminate the lease, accelerate payments and collect liquidated damages.
There were no material changes to our contractual obligations and commitments from September 27, 2003.
Except as set forth above, we do not have any other significant capital commitments. We believe that we have sufficient funds in order to fund our operations over the next twelve months.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure About Market Risk.
Financial Instruments, Other Financial Instruments, and Derivative Commodity Instruments. SFAS No. 107, Disclosure of Fair Value of Financial Instruments, requires disclosure about fair value of financial instruments. Financial instruments consist of cash equivalents, short and long-term investments, accounts receivable, accounts payable and debt obligations. The fair value of these financial instruments approximates their carrying amount.
Primary Market Risk Exposures. Our primary market risk exposures are in the areas of interest rate risk and foreign currency exchange rate risk. We incur interest expense on loans made under a loan and security agreement with Wells Fargo Foothill, Inc. (the Foothill Agreement) and a European line of credit. The Foothill Agreement term loan accrues interest at the prime rate plus 1.0% and the European Line of Credit accrues interest at the Europe Interbank Offered Rate plus 1.50%. At March 27, 2004, we had $1.2 million outstanding under the Foothill Agreement and there were no amounts outstanding under the line of credit.
19
Substantially all of our sales outside the United States are conducted in U.S. dollar denominated transactions. We operate two European subsidiaries which incur expenses denominated in local currencies. However, we believe that these operating expenses will not have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations or financial condition.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures.
We maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our Securities Exchange Act reports is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SECs rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, management recognized that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives, as ours are designed to do, and management necessarily was required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures.
As of March 27, 2004, we carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Based upon that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective in enabling us to record, process, summarize and report information required to be included in our periodic SEC filings within the required time period.
There have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by this report that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
20
HOLOGIC, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Item 1. Legal Proceedings.
No material developments.
Item 2. Changes in Securities.
None.
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities.
None.
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.
The Company held its Annual Meeting of Stockholders on March 1, 2004. At the meeting, a total of 16,872,111 shares or 84% of the Common Stock issued and outstanding as of the record date, were represented in person or by proxy. Set forth below is a brief description of each matter voted upon at the meetings and the voting results with respect to each matter.
1. | A proposal to elect the following seven persons to serve as members of the Companys Board of Directors for the ensuing year and until their successors are duly elected: |
Name |
For |
Withheld |
Abstain | |||
John W. Cumming |
16,531,509 | 340,602 | 0 | |||
Irwin Jacobs |
15,954,645 | 917,466 | 0 | |||
Glenn P. Muir |
16,497,499 | 374,612 | 0 | |||
William A. Peck |
15,955,296 | 916,815 | 0 | |||
Nancy L. Leaming |
15,955,796 | 916,315 | 0 | |||
Jay A. Stein |
16,532,186 | 339,925 | 0 | |||
David R. LaVance, Jr. |
15,955,296 | 916,815 | 0 |
2. | A proposal to amend the Companys Amended and Restated 1999 Equity Incentive Plan. |
For: 7,517,098 Against: 1,576,911 Abstain: 659,419 Broker Non-Votes: 7,118,683
Item 5. Other Information.
None.
21
Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K.
(a) | Exhibits furnished: |
Exhibit Number |
Reference | |||
3.03 Amended and Restated Bylaws |
filed herewith | |||
31.1 Certification of Hologics CEO pursuant to Item 601(b)(31) of Regulation S-K, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
filed herewith | |||
31.2 Certification of Hologics CFO pursuant to Item 601(b)(31) of Regulation S-K, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
filed herewith | |||
32.1 Certification of Hologics CEO pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
filed herewith | |||
32.2 Certification of Hologics CFO pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
filed herewith |
(b) | Reports on Form 8-K: |
The following Current Report on Form 8-K was furnished by the registrant during the period covered by this report: |
Current Report on Form 8-K furnished to the SEC on February 3, 2004 regarding the release of a press release announcing the Companys financial results for the first quarter ended December 27, 2003. |
22
HOLOGIC, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
Hologic, Inc. (Registrant) | ||
May 11, 2004 Date |
/s/ John W. Cumming | |
John W. Cumming | ||
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer | ||
May 11, 2004 Date |
/s/ Glenn P. Muir | |
Glenn P. Muir | ||
Executive Vice President, Finance and Treasurer | ||
(Principal Financial Officer) |
23