Back to GetFilings.com

Table of Contents

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

OR

Commission File Number: 1-14100

IMPAC MORTGAGE HOLDINGS, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

1401 Dove Street, Newport Beach, California 92660

(Address of principal executive offices)

(949) 475-3600

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 12b-2)    Yes  x    No  ¨

As of April 29, 2004 the aggregate market value of the voting stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant was approximately $1.2 billion, based on the closing sales price of common stock on the New York Stock Exchange on that date. For purposes of the calculation, only directors and executive officers of the registrant have been deemed affiliates.

There were 62,670,695 shares of common stock outstanding as of April 29, 2004.

Table of Contents

IMPAC MORTGAGE HOLDINGS, INC.

FORM 10-Q QUARTERLY REPORT

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Table of Contents

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

IMPAC MORTGAGE HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(dollars in thousands, except per share data)

(unaudited)

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

1

Table of Contents

IMPAC MORTGAGE HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE EARNINGS

(in thousands, except earnings per share data)

(unaudited)

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

2

Table of Contents

IMPAC MORTGAGE HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(in thousands)

(unaudited)

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

3

Table of Contents

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Note 1—Basis of Financial Statement Presentation

The accompanying consolidated financial statements of Impac Mortgage Holdings, Inc. (IMH) and our subsidiaries, IMH Assets Corp. (IMH Assets), Impac Warehouse Lending Group (IWLG), Impac Multifamily Capital Corp. (IMCC) and Impac Funding Corporation (IFC), together with its wholly-owned subsidiary Novelle Financial Services, Inc. (NFS), collectively, (the Company, we, us or our), have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP) for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Rule 10-01 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by GAAP for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring adjustments, considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. Operating results for the three-month period ended March 31, 2004 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2004. The accompanying consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and related notes included in the our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003.

The results of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2004 reflect the consolidation of IFC on July 1, 2003. On July 1, 2003, IMH entered into a stock purchase agreement with Joseph R. Tomkinson, our Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and a director, William S. Ashmore, our Chief Operating Officer, President and a director, and the Johnson Revocable Living Trust, of which Richard J. Johnson, our Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer is trustee, whereby IMH purchased all of the outstanding shares of voting common stock of IFC for aggregate consideration of $750,000. Each of Messer’s. Tomkinson and Ashmore and the Johnson Revocable Living Trust owned one-third of the outstanding common stock of IFC. Mr. Tomkinson elected to receive $125,000 worth of his consideration for the sale of his IFC shares of common stock in the form of 7,687 shares of IMH common stock. The fairness opinion related to the purchase price of IFC, as rendered by an independent financial advisor, and the subsequent transaction was approved by our board of directors. As a result of acquiring 100% of IFC’s common stock on July 1, 2003, IMH owns all of the common stock and preferred stock of IFC and began to consolidate IFC as of that date. As such, the consolidated financial statements for the three months ended March 31, 2004 (consolidation period) reflect the results of operations of IFC on a consolidated basis. The consolidated financial statements for the three months ended March 31, 2003 (non-consolidation period) include the results of operations of IFC as equity in net earnings of IFC.

We will not reclassify prior periods’ financial statements to conform to the consolidation of IFC. The consolidated financial statements are prepared on the accrual basis of accounting in accordance with GAAP. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make significant estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities and contingent liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results may differ materially from those estimates.

Note 2—Business Summary

We are a mortgage real estate investment trust (REIT). Together with our subsidiaries we are a nationwide acquirer and originator of primarily non-conforming Alt-A mortgage loans (Alt-A mortgages). Alt-A mortgages are primarily first lien mortgages made to borrowers whose credit is generally within typical Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac guidelines, but have loan characteristics that make them non-conforming under those guidelines.

We operate three core businesses:

The long-term investment operations, conducted by IMH, IMH Assets and IMCC, invest primarily in adjustable and fixed rate Alt-A mortgages that are acquired and originated by the mortgage operations and small balance, multi-family mortgages (multi-family mortgages) originated by IMCC. This business primarily generates net interest income from mortgages held for long-term investment. Investments in Alt-A mortgages and multi-family mortgages are financed with

4

Table of Contents

collateralized mortgage obligations (CMO) financing, warehouse facilities, proceeds from the sale of capital stock and cash.

The mortgage operations, conducted by IFC, acquire, originate, sell and securitize primarily adjustable and fixed rate Alt-A mortgages and, to a lesser extent, sub-prime mortgages (B/C mortgages). The mortgage operations generate income by securitizing and selling loans to permanent investors, including the long-term investment operations, and, to a lesser extent, interest income earned on mortgages held-for-sale and revenue from fees associated with mortgage acquisitions and originations, mortgage servicing rights and master servicing agreements. The mortgage operations use warehouse facilities provided by the warehouse lending operations, conducted by IWLG, to finance the acquisition and origination of mortgages.

The warehouse lending operations provide short-term financing to mortgage loan originators, including the mortgage operations, by funding mortgages from their closing date until they are sold to pre-approved investors. This business earns net interest income from the difference between its cost of borrowings and the interest earned on warehouse advances as well as fees from warehouse transactions.

Note 3—Earnings Per Share

The following table presents the computation of basic and diluted net earnings per share as if all stock options were outstanding for the periods indicated (in thousands, except net earnings per share):

The Company had none and 20,000 stock options during the three months ended March 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively, that were not considered in the calculation of diluted weighted average common and common equivalent shares as the exercise price of the stock options were greater than the average market price during the periods.

Note 4—Stock Options

Stock options and awards may be granted to directors, officers and key employees. The exercise price for any qualified incentive stock options (ISOs) or non-qualified stock options (NQSOs) granted under our stock option plans may not be less than 100% (or 110% in the case of ISOs granted to an employee who is deemed to own in excess of 10% of the outstanding common stock) of the fair market value of the shares of common stock at the time the NQSO or ISO is granted. Grants under stock option plans are made and administered by the board of directors. We currently have a 1995 Stock Option, Deferred Stock and Restricted Stock Plan (1995 plan) and during 2001 the board of directors and stockholders approved a new Stock Option, Deferred Stock and Restricted Stock Plan (2001 plan), collectively, (the stock plans). Each stock plan provides for the grant of ISOs, NQSOs, deferred stock, and restricted stock, and, in the case of the 2001 plan, dividend equivalent rights and, in the case of the 1995 plan, stock appreciation rights and limited stock appreciation rights awards (awards).

In December 2002, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued SFAS No. 148, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation—Transition and Disclosure” (SFAS 148), an amendment of FASB Statement No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation,” (SFAS 123). SFAS 148 amends SFAS 123 to provide alternative methods of transition for a voluntary change to the fair value method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation. In

5

Table of Contents

addition, SFAS 148 amends the disclosure requirements of SFAS 123 to require prominent disclosures in both annual and interim financial statements. On January 1, 2003, IMH adopted the disclosure requirements of SFAS 148. In November 1995, the FASB issued SFAS No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation” (SFAS 123). This statement establishes financial accounting standards for stock-based employee compensation plans. SFAS 123 permits management to choose either a new fair value based method or the current Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees,” (APB 25) intrinsic value based method of accounting for its stock-based compensation arrangements. SFAS 123 requires pro forma disclosures of net earnings (loss) computed as if the fair value based method had been applied in financial statements of companies that continue to follow current practice in accounting for such arrangements under APB 25. SFAS 123 applies to all stock-based employee compensation plans in which an employer grants shares of its stock or other equity instruments to employees except for employee stock ownership plans. SFAS 123 also applies to plans in which the employer incurs liabilities to employees in amounts based on the price of the employer’s stock, i.e., stock option plans, stock purchase plans, restricted stock plans and stock appreciation rights. The statement also specifies the accounting for transactions in which a company issues stock options or other equity instruments for services provided by non-employees or to acquire goods or services from outside suppliers or vendors.

As of March 31, 2004, we had stock-based compensation plans and we applied APB 25 in accounting for our plans. No compensation cost has been recognized for fixed stock option plans. If compensation cost for our stock-based compensation plans were recorded consistent with SFAS 123, our net earnings and earnings per share would have been the pro forma amounts indicated below (dollars in thousands, except per share amounts):

There were no stock options granted during the first quarter of 2004 and 2003, therefore, pro forma net earnings and net earnings per share reflect the amortization of previously granted stock options which are amortized as expense over the stock option life in determining the pro forma impact.

Note 5—Segment Reporting

We internally review and analyze our operating segments as follows:

6

Table of Contents

The following table presents business segments as of and for the three months ended March 31, 2004 (in thousands):

The following table presents business segments as of and for the three months ended March 31, 2003 (in thousands):

Note 6—Allowance for Loan Losses

An allowance is maintained for losses on mortgages held-for-investment, mortgages held as CMO collateral and finance receivables (loans provided for) at an amount that management believes provides for losses inherent in those loan portfolios. We have implemented a methodology designed to analyze the performance of various loan portfolios based upon the relatively homogeneous nature within these loan portfolios. The allowance for losses is also analyzed using the following factors:

7

Table of Contents

In evaluating the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses, management takes several items into consideration. For instance, a detailed analysis of historical loan performance data is accumulated and reviewed. This data is analyzed for loss performance and prepayment performance by product type, origination year and securitization issuance. As allowed under SFAS No. 114, “Accounting by Creditors for Impairment of a Loan” and as amended by SFAS No. 118, “Accounting by Creditors for Impairment of a Loan—Income Recognition and Disclosures,” (SFAS 114) we determine impairment collectively on loan pools as they are made up of smaller balance homogenous loans. These homogeneous loans are assessed for impairment by loan type. The largest mortgage loan pools by type consist of residential mortgages, however, multifamily and B/C mortgages are loan pools that are also assessed for impairment. The results of that analysis are then applied to our current loan portfolios and an estimate is created.

In addition, management provides an allowance for loan losses on Alt-A mortgages that are retained for long-term investment and which are not underwritten to our specific underwriting guidelines. These mortgages are acquired on a bulk basis by the mortgage operations from other mortgage originators that underwrite mortgages substantially similar, but not specific, to our mortgage underwriting guidelines (non-Impac mortgages). Management also recognizes that there are qualitative factors that must be taken into consideration when evaluating and measuring inherent loss in our loan portfolios. These items include, but are not limited to, economic indicators that may affect the borrower’s ability to pay, changes in value of collateral, political factors and industry statistics.

At the end of March of 2004, we discovered that one client of the warehouse lending operations and certain of its officers had perpetrated a fraud pursuant to which they defrauded the warehouse lending operations into making advances pursuant to a warehouse line of credit. As of the date the fraud was discovered, an aggregate of $12.6 million of fraudulent loan advances were outstanding. We immediately terminated the warehouse line of credit and have been cooperating with federal investigators in their ongoing investigation of the defrauding parties.

We retained an independent consultant to investigate the matter; the investigator reported that no principals of the warehouse lending operations had knowingly participated in the fraud. As a result of the fraud, during the first quarter of 2004 we established a specific allowance for loan losses in the amount of $6.0 million to provide for anticipated losses on the fraudulent warehouse advances as we have deemed this amount to be non-collectible. Based on available information, we believe we will be able to recover the remaining $6.6 million of related warehouse advances over time. To the extent that we believe that the actual losses will exceed the $6.0 million allowance, we will make an additional allowance for loan losses when, or if, we determine it is appropriate to do so as events and circumstances dictate. However, we believe that this specific allowance is adequate to provide for anticipated loan losses based on currently available information.

Activity for allowance for loan losses for the periods shown was as follows (in thousands):

8

Table of Contents

In the opinion of management and in accordance with the loan loss allowance methodology, the present allowance for loan losses is considered adequate to provide for losses inherent in the loan portfolios. Subsequent recoveries on loans previously charged to the allowance for loan losses are credited back to the allowance for loan losses.

Note 7—Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities

Our primary objective is to hedge exposure to the variability in future cash flows attributable to the variability of one-month LIBOR, which is the underlying index of our adjustable rate CMO borrowings. We also monitor on an ongoing basis the prepayment risks that arise in fluctuating interest rate environments. Our interest rate hedging program is formulated with the intent to offset the potential adverse effects of changing interest rates on cash flows on CMO borrowings resulting from the following:

To mitigate exposure to the effect of changing interest rates on cash flows on CMO borrowings, we purchase derivative instruments in the form of interest rate swap agreements (swaps), interest rate cap agreements (caps) and interest rate floor agreements (floors). A swap is generally a contractual agreement that obligates one party to receive or make cash payments based on an adjustable rate index and the other party to receive or make cash payments based on a fixed rate. Swaps have the effect of fixing borrowing costs on a similar amount of swaps and, as a result, can reduce the interest rate variability of borrowings. A cap or floor is a contractual agreement for which we pay or receive a fee. If prevailing interest rates reach levels specified in the cap or floor agreement, we may either receive or pay cash. Our objective is to lock in a reliable stream of cash flows when interest rates fall below or rise above certain levels. For instance, when interest rates rise, borrowing costs may increase at greater speeds than the underlying collateral supporting the borrowings. These derivative instruments hedge the variability of forecasted cash flows attributable to CMO borrowings and protect net interest income by providing cash flows at certain triggers during changing interest rate environments. In all interest-rate hedging transactions, counter-parties must be highly rated as determined by various credit rating agencies.

Caps and floors qualify as derivative instruments under provisions of SFAS 133. The derivative instrument is the specific LIBOR cap or floor that is hedging the LIBOR based CMO borrowings. The nature of the risk being hedged is the variability of the cash flows associated with the LIBOR borrowings. Prior to the adoption of DIG G20, management assessed the hedging effectiveness of its caps and floors utilizing only the intrinsic value of the caps. DIG G20 allows management to utilize the terminal value of the caps and floors to assess effectiveness. DIG G20 also allows for amortization of the initial fair value of the caps and floors over the life of the caps based on the maturity date of the individual caplets. Upon adoption of DIG G20, net income and accumulated other comprehensive income were adjusted by the amount needed to reflect the cumulative impact of adopting the provisions of DIG G20. Subsequent to the adoption of DIG G20, caps and floors are considered effective hedges and are marked to market each reporting period with the entire change in market value being recognized in accumulated other comprehensive earnings.

Under SFAS 133, an entity that elects to apply hedge accounting is required to establish at the inception of the hedge the method it will use for assessing the effectiveness of the derivative instrument and the measurement and approach for determining the ineffective aspect of the hedge. Those methods must be consistent with the entity’s approach to managing interest rate risk. This statement was effective for all fiscal quarters of fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2000. Effectiveness of derivative instruments is measured by the fact that the hedged item, CMO borrowings, and the derivative instrument are based on one-month LIBOR. As both instruments are tied to the same index, the hedge is expected to be highly effective both at inception and on an ongoing basis. We assess the effectiveness and ineffectiveness of the hedges at the inception of the hedge and at each reporting period. Based on the fact that, at inception, the critical terms of the hedges and forecasted CMO borrowings are the same, we have concluded that the changes in cash flows attributable to the risk being hedged are expected to be substantially offset by the derivative instrument, subject to subsequent assessments that the critical terms have not changed.

The mortgage operations enters into forward commitments and derivative transactions to mitigate changes in the value of its mortgage pipeline. The mortgage pipeline are mortgages that have not yet been acquired, however, the mortgage operations have committed to acquire the mortgages in the future at pre-determined rates through rate-lock commitments. Prior to the issuance of SAB 105, “Application of Accounting Principles to Loan Commitments,” (SAB 105), which clarifies the SEC’s position on the accounting for loan commitments, the mortgage operations recorded the fair value of its

9

Table of Contents

mortgage pipeline, excluding servicing value, as it qualifies as a derivative instrument under the provisions of SFAS 133, however, it does not qualify for hedging treatment. SAB 105 also addresses the issues of not recognizing cash flows associated with servicing prior to the sale or securitization of funded loans and certain other disclosure issues pertaining to loan commitments. SAB 105 also significantly limits a company’s ability to record an asset on its mortgage pipeline. We have adopted the new requirements within SAB 105, and as a result, we have not recorded an asset related to our outstanding mortgage pipeline as of March 31, 2004.

The following table presents certain information related to derivatives and the related component in the financial statements as of March 31, 2004 (dollars in thousands):

The following table presents certain information related to derivatives and the related component in the financial statements as of December 31, 2003 (dollars in thousands):

Note 8—Income Taxes

We operate so as to qualify as a REIT under the requirements of the Internal Revenue Code (the Code). Requirements for qualification as a REIT include various restrictions on ownership of IMH’s stock, requirements concerning distribution of taxable income and certain restrictions on the nature of assets and sources of income. A REIT must distribute at least

10

Table of Contents

90% of its taxable income to its stockholders of which 85% must be distributed within the taxable year in order to avoid the imposition of an excise tax. The remaining balance may extend until timely filing of our tax return in the subsequent taxable year. Qualifying distributions of taxable income are deductible by a REIT in computing taxable income. If in any tax year IMH should not qualify as a REIT, we would be taxed as a corporation and distributions to stockholders would not be deductible in computing taxable income. If IMH were to fail to qualify as a REIT in any tax year, we would not be permitted to qualify for that year and the succeeding four years. As of December 31, 2003, we had estimated federal and state net operating loss tax carry-forwards of $18.7 million that are available to offset future taxable income.

IFC is a taxable REIT subsidiary and is therefore subject to corporate income taxes. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax base. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date.

Note 9—Recent Accounting Pronouncements

FASB Interpretation 46 (revised December 2003), “Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities” (FIN 46R), requires a variable interest entity to be consolidated by a company if that company is subject to a majority of the risk of loss from the variable interest entity’s activities or is entitled to receive a majority of the entity’s residual returns or both. Prior to FIN 46R, a company included another entity in its consolidated financial statements only if it controlled the entity through voting interests. FIN 46R also requires disclosures about variable interest entities that the company is not required to consolidate but in which it has a significant variable interest. The consolidated requirements of FIN 46R apply to all variable interest entities (VIEs) by the end of the first reporting period that ends after December 15, 2003. The provisions of FIN 46R for interests held by public entities in VIEs that are not qualified special purpose entities are required to be applied by the first reporting period that ends after March 15, 2004. In connection with our CMO transactions, mortgages are transferred into trusts that are classified as VIEs and are consolidated with the financial results of IMH and its subsidiaries. After the purchase of IFC’s common stock by IMH on July 1, 2003, we began to consolidate IFC’s financial results as of that date.

SAB 105 clarifies the SEC’s position on the accounting for loan commitments. Consistent with SFAS 149, SAB 105 states that loan commitments are treated as derivative instruments. SAB 105 also addresses the issues of not recognizing cashflows associated with servicing prior to the sale or securitization of funded loans and certain other disclosure issues pertaining to loan commitments. SAB 105 also significantly limits a company’s ability to record an asset on its mortgage pipeline. We have adopted the new requirements within SAB 105 and as a result, we have not recorded an asset related to our outstanding mortgage pipeline as of March 31, 2004.

11

Table of Contents

Unless the context otherwise requires, the terms “Company,” “we,” “us,” and “our” refer to Impac Mortgage Holdings, Inc., or “IMH,” a Maryland corporation incorporated in August 1995, and our subsidiaries, IMH Assets Corp., or “IMH Assets,” Impac Warehouse Lending Group, Inc., or “IWLG,” Impac Multifamily Capital Corporation, or “IMCC,” and Impac Funding Corporation, or “IFC,” together with its wholly-owned subsidiary Novelle Financial Services, Inc., or “NFS.” References to IMH are made to differentiate IMH, the publicly traded company, as a separate entity from IMH Assets, IWLG, IMCC and IFC.

Forward-Looking Statements

This quarterly report on Form 10-Q contains certain forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Forward-looking statements, some of which are based on various assumptions and events that are beyond our control may be identified by reference to a future period or periods or by the use of forward-looking terminology, such as “may,” “will,” “believe,” “expect,” “plan,” “anticipate,” “continue,” or similar terms or variations on those terms or the negative of those terms. Actual results could differ materially from those set forth in forward-looking statements due to a number of factors, including, but not limited to, failure to achieve projected earnings levels, the ability to generate sufficient liquidity, the ability to access the capital markets, the size and frequency of our securitizations, the ability to generate taxable income and pay dividends, interest rate fluctuations on our assets that differ from those on our liabilities, increase in prepayment rates on our mortgage assets, changes in assumptions regarding estimated loan losses or fair value amounts, changes in expectations of future interest rates, the availability of financing and, if available, the terms of any financing, changes in origination and resale pricing of mortgages, changes in markets which we serve and changes in general market and economic conditions. For a discussion of the risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ from those contained in the forward-looking statements, see “Risk Factors” and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in this quarterly report. We do not undertake, and specifically disclaim any obligation, to publicly release the results of any revisions that may be made to any forward-looking statements to reflect the occurrence of anticipated or unanticipated events or circumstances after the date of such statements.

General and Business Operations

We are a mortgage real estate investment trust, or “REIT,” that is a nationwide acquirer, originator, seller and investor of primarily non-conforming Alt-A mortgages, or “Alt-A mortgages,” and to a lesser extent, small-balance, multi-family mortgages, or “multi-family mortgages” and sub-prime mortgages, or “B/C mortgages.” We also provide warehouse and repurchase financing to originators of mortgages.

We operate three core businesses:

The long-term investment operations primarily invest in adjustable and fixed rate Alt-A mortgages that are acquired and originated by our mortgage operations. Alt-A mortgages are primarily first lien mortgages made to borrowers whose credit is generally within typical Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac guidelines, but have loan characteristics that make them non-conforming under those guidelines. Some of the principal differences between mortgages purchased by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac and Alt-A mortgages are as follows:

For instance, Alt-A mortgages may not have certain documentation or verifications that are required by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac and, therefore, in making our credit decisions, we may be more reliant upon the borrower’s credit score

12

Table of Contents

and the adequacy of the underlying collateral. We believe that Alt-A mortgages provide an attractive net earnings profile by producing higher yields without commensurately higher credit losses than other types of mortgages.

The long-term investment operations also originate and invest in multi-family mortgages with initial fixed interest rate periods of three, five and seven years that subsequently adjust to adjustable rate mortgages with loan balances that generally range from $250,000 to $3.0 million. Multi-family mortgages have interest rate floors, which is the initial start rate, and prepayment penalty periods of three, five and seven years. Multi-family mortgages provide greater asset diversification on our balance sheet as borrowers of multi-family mortgages typically have higher credit scores and longer lives than Alt-A mortgages.

The long-term investment operations generate earnings primarily from net interest income earned on mortgages held for long-term investment, which consists of mortgages held as CMO collateral and mortgages held for investment on our balance sheet. Investment in Alt-A mortgages and multi-family mortgages are initially financed with short-term borrowings under reverse repurchase agreements which are subsequently converted to long-term financing in the form of collateralized mortgage obligations, or “CMO,” financing. Cash flow from the mortgage loan investment portfolio and proceeds from the sale of capital stock also finance new Alt-A and multi-family mortgage acquisitions and originations.

The mortgage operations acquire and originate primarily adjustable and fixed rate Alt-A mortgages and, to a lesser extent, B/C mortgages as follows:

The mortgage operations generate income by securitizing and selling mortgages to permanent investors, including the long-term investment operations. This business also earns revenue from interest income on mortgages held-for-sale and fees associated with mortgage acquisitions and originations, mortgage servicing rights and master servicing agreements. The mortgage operations use warehouse facilities provided by the warehouse lending operations to finance the acquisition and origination of mortgages.

The warehouse lending operations provide short-term financing to mortgage loan originators, including the mortgage operations, by funding mortgages from their closing date until sale to pre-approved investors. This business earns net interest income from the difference between its cost of borrowings and the interest earned on warehouse advances as well as fees from warehouse transactions.

Our goal is to generate consistent reliable income for distribution to our stockholders primarily from earnings generated by our core operating businesses.

Critical Accounting Policies

We define critical accounting policies as those that are important to the portrayal of our financial condition and results of operations and require estimates and assumptions based on our judgment of changing market conditions and the performance of our assets and liabilities at any given time. In determining which accounting policies meet this definition, we considered our policies with respect to the valuation of our assets and liabilities and estimates and assumptions used in determining those valuations. We believe the most critical accounting issues that require the most complex and difficult judgments and that are particularly susceptible to significant change to our financial condition and results of operations include the following:

Allowance for loan losses. We provide an allowance for loan losses for mortgages held as CMO collateral, finance receivables and mortgages held-for-investment, or “loans provided for.” In evaluating the adequacy of the allowance for

13

Table of Contents

loan losses, management takes several items into consideration. For instance, a detailed analysis of historical loan performance data is accumulated and reviewed. This data is analyzed for loss performance and prepayment performance by product type, origination year and securitization issuance. The results of that analysis are then applied to the current mortgage portfolio and an estimate is created. We believe that pooling of mortgages with similar characteristics is an appropriate methodology in which to evaluate the allowance for loan losses. In addition, management provides an allowance for loan losses for Alt-A mortgages that are retained for long-term investment and which are not underwritten to our specific underwriting guidelines. These mortgages are acquired on a bulk basis by the mortgage operations from other mortgage originators that underwrite mortgages substantially similar, but not specific, to our mortgage underwriting guidelines, or “non-Impac mortgages.” Management also recognizes that there are qualitative factors that must be taken into consideration when evaluating and measuring inherent loss in our loan portfolios. These items include, but are not limited to, economic indicators that may affect the borrower’s ability to pay, changes in value of collateral, political factors and industry statistics. For additional information regarding allowance for loan losses refer to “Results of Operations and Financial Condition—Impac Mortgage Holdings, Inc.”

Valuation of derivative instruments. The mortgage operations acquire derivative instruments to mitigate changes in the value of its mortgage pipeline. The mortgage pipeline consist of mortgages that have not yet been acquired, however, the mortgage operations has committed to acquire the mortgages in the future at pre-determined interest rates through rate-lock commitments. On March 9, 2004, the SEC issued Staff Accounting Bulletin 105, “Application of Accounting Principles to Loan Commitments,” or “SAB 105,” which clarifies the SEC’s position on the accounting for loan commitments. Consistent with SFAS No. 149, “Amendment of Statement 133 on Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities,” or “SFAS 149,” SAB 105 states that loan commitments are treated as derivative instruments. Prior to the issuance of SAB 105, the mortgage operations recorded the fair market value of its mortgage pipeline, excluding mortgage servicing value, as it qualifies as a derivative instrument under the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, or “SFAS 133,” however, it does not qualify for hedging treatment. Therefore, the mortgage pipeline and the related fair market value of derivative instruments were marked to market each reporting period along with a corresponding entry to non-interest expense. SAB 105 also addresses the issues of not recognizing cash flows associated with servicing prior to the sale or securitization of funded loans and certain other disclosure issues pertaining to loan commitments. SAB 105 also significantly limits a company’s ability to record an asset on its mortgage pipeline. We have adopted the new requirements within SAB 105, and as a result, we have not recorded an asset related to our outstanding mortgage pipeline as of March 31, 2004.

Financial Highlights for the First Quarter of 2004

14

Table of Contents

Results of Operations and Financial Condition—Impac Mortgage Holdings, Inc.

Consolidation of IFC

The results of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2004 reflect the consolidation of IFC on July 1, 2003. On July 1, 2003, IMH entered into a stock purchase agreement with Joseph R. Tomkinson, our Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and a director, William S. Ashmore, our Chief Operating Officer, President and a director, and the Johnson Revocable Living Trust, of which Richard J. Johnson, our Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer is trustee, whereby IMH purchased all of the outstanding shares of voting common stock of IFC for aggregate consideration of $750,000. Each of Messer’s. Tomkinson and Ashmore and the Johnson Revocable Living Trust owned one-third of the outstanding common stock of IFC. Mr. Tomkinson elected to receive $125,000 worth of his consideration for the sale of his IFC shares of common stock in the form of 7,687 shares of IMH common stock. The fairness opinion related to the purchase price of IFC, as rendered by an independent financial advisor, and the subsequent transaction was approved by our board of directors. As a result of acquiring 100% of IFC’s common stock on July 1, 2003, IMH owns all of the common stock and preferred stock of IFC and began to consolidate IFC as of that date. As such, the consolidated financial statements for the three months ended March 31, 2004, or “consolidation period,” reflect the results of operations of IFC on a consolidated basis. The consolidated financial statements for the three months ended March 31, 2003, or “non-consolidation period,” include the results of operations of IFC as equity in net earnings of IFC.

Results of Operations—

For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2004 compared to the Three Months Ended March 31, 2003

Net Earnings

Net earnings increased 80% to $46.0 million, or $0.76 per diluted share, for the first quarter of 2004 compared to $25.5 million, or $0.53 per diluted share, for the first quarter of 2003. The quarter-over-quarter increase in net earnings of $20.5 million was primarily due to the following:

Taxable Income

After adjusting for our estimates of the differences between net earnings and taxable income, estimated taxable income was $45.5 million, or $0.75 per diluted share, for the first quarter of 2004 as compared to $28.0 million, or $0.58 per diluted share, for the first quarter of 2003. When we file our annual tax returns there are certain adjustments that we make to net earnings and taxable income due to differences in the nature and extent that revenues and expenses are recognized under the two methods. For instance, to calculate taxable income we deduct actual loan losses as compared to the determination of net earnings that require a deduction of loan loss provisions which are determined based on estimated losses inherent in our loan portfolios. To maintain our REIT status, we are required to distribute a minimum of 90% of our annual taxable income to our stockholders. Because we pay dividends based on taxable income, dividends may be more or less than net earnings. As such, we believe that the disclosure of estimated taxable income, which is a non-generally accepted accounting principle, or “GAAP,” financial measurement, is useful information for our investors. Of estimated taxable income of $45.5 million, or $0.73 per outstanding share, we declared total regular cash dividends of $40.7 million or $0.65 per outstanding share during the first quarter of 2004. Upon the filing of our 2002 tax return, we had federal and state net operating tax loss carry-forwards of $18.7 million that may or may not be used to offset taxable income in

15

Table of Contents

subsequent years. The following table presents a reconciliation of net earnings to estimated taxable income for the periods indicated (dollars in thousands, except per share amounts):