Back to GetFilings.com

Table of Contents

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

Annual Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15 (d)

of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

RELIABILITY INCORPORATED

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

(281) 492-0550

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

Common Stock, no par value per share

(Title of class)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding twelve months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past ninety days. YES  x NO  ¨

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of the registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12(b)-2 of the Act). YES  ¨ NO  x

State the aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates; computed by reference to the price at which the common equity was last sold, or the average bid and asked price of such common equity, as of the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter $6,391,050.

as of March 8, 2004

Documents Incorporated by Reference

Listed hereunder are the documents incorporated by reference and the Part of the Form 10-K into which such documents are incorporated:

Table of Contents

RELIABILITY INCORPORATED

Form 10-K

TABLE OF CONTENTS

December 31, 2003

2

Table of Contents

PART I

Item 1.    Business

THE COMPANY

Reliability Incorporated is principally engaged in the design, manufacture, market and support of high performance equipment used to test and condition integrated circuits (“Test and Conditioning Products”). Reliability and its subsidiary (collectively referred to as “Reliability” or the “Company”) also designs, manufactures and markets a line of DC-DC power converters (“Power Sources”) and operates a service facility in Singapore that conditions and tests integrated circuits as a service for others (“Services”). In July 2003, the Company entered a new line of business (“Automotive”) by acquiring the rights to manufacture and market an aftermarket hydraulic lifting device that is installed in the bed of pickup trucks. The Company’s strategy for each of these business segments is to target customers and other prospects who are market leaders, to provide high-quality products and services, to develop long-term relationships with its customers by investing in specific research and development to meet their needs, and to continuously reduce both the customers’ and the Company’s cost and time to market.

The Company was incorporated under the laws of the State of Texas in 1953, but the principal business of the Company as described in this report started in 1971. The Company has one wholly owned subsidiary, Reliability Singapore, Pte Ltd. Reliability de Costa Rica, S.A. was shut down and dissolved in the third quarter of 2002, when its business was transferred to the parent company.

INDUSTRY OVERVIEW

Rapid technological advances resulting in evolving industry standards characterize the semiconductor industry. As the performance of semiconductors has increased and their physical size and cost per function have decreased, the demand for semiconductors has expanded not only in computer systems but also in telecommunications, automotive products, consumer goods and industrial automation and controls. The demand for smaller, faster, higher performance integrated circuits (“ICs”) continuously places new technical challenges and demands on semiconductor manufacturers and semiconductor equipment manufacturers to provide innovative new products and product enhancements to improve quality control and reduce manufacturing cost.

Under current semiconductor technology and manufacturing processes, manufacturers are unable to consistently produce batches of ICs that are completely free of defects that may cause the ICs to fail. An IC may be defective at the time it is produced or it may have a latent defect that eventually will cause it to fail. An IC with such a defect will almost always fail during the first 500-1000 hours of normal use. As a result, it has become customary to “condition” or “burn-in” ICs (i.e., to subject them, during a relatively short period of time, to controlled stresses which simulate the first several hundred hours of operation) to identify defects prior to delivery. Such conditioning subjects the ICs to maximum rated temperatures, voltages and electrical signals. Following burn-in, the ICs are tested to determine whether they function as designed.

PRODUCTS

During fiscal 2003, Reliability had four operating segments based on its product and service offerings: Test and Conditioning Products, Services, Power Sources and Automotive. See Note 4 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for financial information regarding segment reporting.

TEST AND CONDITIONING PRODUCTS

The Company has been providing leading technology capital equipment to IC manufacturers and users to burn-in ICs since 1975 and to functionally test ICs during burn-in since 1980. Reliability’s burn-in and testing products contain sophisticated hardware and software, most of which are designed and manufactured at the Company’s Houston, Texas facility.

3

Table of Contents

The Company was one of the first to design, manufacture and market systems that utilize burn-in and test technology within the same product. Historically, such equipment was used as a tool for engineering and quality assurance to qualify and evaluate new designs and diagnose defects and was not an integral part of the manufacturing process. Today, many IC manufacturers are implementing functional testing during burn-in as a part of the manufacturing process. Since 1992, the Company has focused its research and development on equipment and related software that perform functional testing during burn-in of memory devices (i.e., DRAM, SRAM, SDRAM) and micrologic devices (i.e., microprocessors). This focus has led to the development of three major product families: INTERSECT^™, CRITERIA^® 18, and CRITERIA 20.

INTERSECT memory test systems perform functional and long cycle tests on large quantities of memory devices in parallel during the conditioning (burn-in) process. This represents a difference in the way most memory devices have historically been tested. Traditionally, a significant amount of time was spent serially testing devices after they were conditioned using serial testers typically capable of testing 64 to 128 devices at a time. Because the INTERSECT systems can perform many of these same tests during the burn-in process in a massively parallel environment, and are less expensive than serial testers, IC manufacturers of DRAMs, SDRAMs and SRAMs can reduce final test cost by an estimated 30% to 60%. INTERSECT systems offer large test capacity, automated calibration, a fully algorithmic test generator, comprehensive software and networking via industry standard LAN.

CRITERIA 18 systems are designed for fine-line geometry micrologic devices (i.e., microprocessors) that dissipate large amounts of heat. The CRITERIA 18 offers total microprocessor control, solid state switching for low electrical noise, large system capacity with high current power buses, and the ability to dissipate up to 15,000 Watts of power in an economically sized system. The Company believes these features allow users to significantly reduce the amount of floor space required when performing burn-in or burn-in and test of low and medium power micrologic devices. The CRITERIA 18 systems offer a comprehensive software system and networking via industry standard LAN.

CRITERIA 20, introduced in July 2001, is the Company’s newest generation burn-in and test system for medium and high power micrologic devices. The Company believes the CRITERIA 20 offers its customers a step function increase in system performance at an economical price. CRITERIA 20 systems include: high speed test electronics, delivery and control of large amounts of current at very low voltages, thermal management techniques to tightly control temperature gradient and large variations in dissipation from device to device, dissipation options up to 57,600 Watts of power, extensive self test, calibration and diagnostics, a comprehensive software system and networking via industry standard LAN.

SERVICES

The Company has provided burn-in and other related services to its customers since 1971. The establishment or expansion of a service facility requires a large investment of capital. Although capital cost has historically been shared by the Company and its customers, the Company is primarily responsible for providing the building and equipment required, along with the personnel and management to operate the facility.

The Company operates a services facility in Singapore that uses CRITERIA and INTERSECT systems to provide burn-in and burn-in test services for DRAM, SDRAM, SRAM, and microprocessors. The Company also uses related equipment acquired from others to provide serial testing, laser-marking, and tape and reel services. Services are generally sold on a periodically adjusted per-unit-processed basis to large volume semiconductor manufacturers that prefer to focus on their core business and technologies and to deploy their capital accordingly.

4

Table of Contents

POWER SOURCES

The operating components of electronic equipment frequently have varying electrical requirements. Rather than provide power to each component separately, specialized power devices called DC-DC converters, or power sources, are used to convert direct current voltage into a higher or lower voltage. By using small DC-DC converters, electronic equipment can operate from a single output power supply yet provide different voltages to different operating components. These DC-DC converters allow designers of electronic equipment to localize power requirements, increase modularity in the product design, and expand equipment features without having to redefine power needs.

The Company introduced its initial power source in 1972. Today the Company offers a wide range of DC-DC converters from 1 to 30 Watts. The Company focuses on developing specialized DC-DC converters for targeted customers within the telecommunications, computer and other industries that are adopting lower voltage components that operate at different voltages within the same equipment. The Company designs and markets power sources at its Houston, Texas facility and then makes the products available through its substantial distribution and representative network in the U.S. and Europe.

AUTOMOTIVE

In July of 2003, the Company acquired the intellectual property rights and related assets to manufacture and market a unique hydraulic lifting system (“Ezy-Load” ^tm) that installs in the bed of pickup trucks without sacrificing valuable cargo space. Historically, cargo loading and unloading of pickup trucks has been a labor intensive, manual task requiring multiple people and involving risk of injury and damage to cargo when lifting, lowering, pushing and pulling large or heavy items into or out of the bed of the truck.

Ezy-Load lifting system is designed to fit most 1/2, 3/4 and 1 ton pickup trucks. The system operates from the vehicle’s 12-volt battery, which provides power to the crane winch and the hydraulic power unit. The hydraulics are completely self-contained with a DC motor, gear pump, reservoir and load hold check valves to prevent overloading. Flow from the pump, to a pair of double-acting cylinders, provides the lift and rotation necessary to extend and retract the lift arms via a hand-held remote control. Ezy-Load allows a single person to easily lift, position, load and unload heavy or bulky cargo, up to 1,000 lbs., while standing clear of the load. The Company believes the Ezy-Load lifting system provides customers a safer work environment and will quickly pay for itself in reduced hand and back injuries caused by lifting and sliding heavy cargo manually. The product will initially be marketed directly by the Company in the Harris County, Texas area.

RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT

The semiconductor industry’s and the electronic equipment industry’s demand for increasingly complex and sophisticated equipment requires innovation and accurate anticipation of changing needs and emerging technology trends. To avoid becoming technologically obsolete over time, the Company commits a significant portion of its resources to research and development programs for new products, services and enhancements to existing products. Research and development expenditures for the Company’s four operating segments were $1.3 million in fiscal 2003. These expenditures were $2.5 million in fiscal 2002 and $2.9 million in fiscal 2001. Total research and development was 64% of revenue in 2003, compared to 62% in 2002 and 24% in fiscal 2001.

Research and development programs for the Test and Conditioning Products segment account for a significant portion of these expenditures. The Company’s development activities are focused on solutions to meet the technical requirements created by continually shrinking geometries of the new generations of integrated circuits. The Company has developed new high speed test and interface electronics, methods to deliver large amounts of current at very low voltages, thermal management techniques to handle large variations in heat dissipation from device to device and methods to effectively manage higher power in a chamber operating at lower temperatures. Some of these features were introduced during fiscal 2000 and 2001 as retrofit enhancements

5

Table of Contents

to the Company’s CRITERIA 18 product line. The CRITERIA 20, which was introduced in July of 2001, incorporates many of these features and provides a step function increase in performance compared to the Company’s previous product offerings. The Company anticipates that it will continue to have significant research and development expenditures in the future to provide new products and enhancements to existing products, including the CRITERIA 20.

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY

The Company believes that rapidly changing technology in the electronics industry makes the Company’s future success dependent on the quality of its products and services, the technical skills of its personnel, and its ability to adapt to the changing technological requirements more than upon the protection of any proprietary rights. The Company holds several patents and has pending patent applications on certain components of its test and conditioning equipment, topology for regulated outputs of its DC-DC converters and lift arm linkage and positioning of its lifting systems.

Although the Company believes that its intellectual property has value and can provide it with a competitive advantage, no single patent is, in itself, critical to the Company as a whole or to any of its operating segments. While the Company attempts to protect its intellectual property through patents, copyrights, trade secrets, trademarks, and other means, there can be no assurance that these measures will be sufficient or provide significant competitive advantages.

RAW MATERIALS AND INVENTORY

The Company’s products contain certain parts that it manufactures and assembles as well as components and assemblies purchased from others. In most cases, the Company is not a significant purchaser of raw materials from its suppliers and therefore has little control over either the availability or pricing of component parts for test and conditioning products, power sources or lifting systems. The Company maintains an inventory of components and parts for its manufacturing activities. There are many sources for most of the raw materials needed for the Company’s manufacturing activities, although a few components come from sole sources. The Company has not experienced any significant inability to obtain components or parts, but does experience occasional delays and long lead times for certain items. The inability to acquire certain key components for an extended period of time could have a material adverse effect on the Company.

CUSTOMERS

The Company develops, markets and sells products for, and provides services to, semiconductor manufacturers and users of large quantities of ICs. Since development cost for products and the capital cost for services are high, the Company targets customers that it believes have the financial capacity to buy large enough quantities of products and services to provide the Company with a return on its investment. In addition, due to the fact that there are only a small number of companies that have a need to test and condition large batches of ICs, the potential customer base is limited. The Company’s ability to maintain or increase its sales in the future will depend, in part, on its ability to obtain orders from its existing and new customers as well as the financial condition and success of its existing customers.

In 2003, sales to the Company’s largest customers accounted for approximately 52% of its net sales, compared to 71% in fiscal 2002 and 78% in fiscal 2001. In 2003, Intel Corporation (“Intel”) and Alliance Semiconductor Corporation (“Alliance”) accounted for 28% and 24%, respectively, of the Company’s net sales. During fiscal 2002, Intel, Alliance and Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. (“AMD”) accounted for 49%, 11%, and 11% of the Company’s net sales, respectively. In fiscal 2001 Intel, AMD, and Alliance accounted for 46%, 18%, and 14% of the Company’s net sales, respectively. No other customer represented more than 10% of the Company’s net sales during these periods. See also Note 4 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

6

Table of Contents

The Company expects that sales of its products and services to a limited number of customers will continue to account for a high percentage of net sales in its traditional business lines. Additionally, sales to a particular customer may fluctuate significantly from quarter to quarter and year to year. The loss of a key customer or any substantial reduction or delay in orders from any one customer could have a material adverse effect on the Company.

COMPETITION

The markets for the Company’s products and services are subject to intense competition and are characterized by rapidly changing technology. The Company’s competitors can be expected to continue to improve the design and performance of their products and to introduce new products with competitive price performance characteristics. Competitive pressures often necessitate price reductions that can adversely affect operating results. Although the Company believes that it has certain technological and other advantages over its competitors, maintaining such advantages will require a continued high level of investment by the Company in research and development, marketing and service.

The Company’s primary competitors in the Test and Conditioning Products segment are other independent manufacturers of similar systems and manufacturers of ICs who design their own equipment. The primary methods of competition in this segment are product features, quality, service, delivery, and price. The Company believes that its service after the sale, including its ability to provide installation, maintenance service, and spare parts, enhances its competitiveness.

The primary areas of competition for the Company’s Services are price, service level and geographic location. The Singapore Services facility provides services to IC users and manufacturers in Singapore and Southeast Asia.

The world market for power sources is divided into the merchant and the captive markets. The Company estimates there are more than 1,000 competitors in the merchant market of the power sources manufacturing business, most of which target a particular application for their business. The Company believes there are approximately 20 to 30 significant competitors whose products compete directly with those of the Company in its U.S. and foreign markets. Competition in the power sources market is based primarily on the specific features of the power sources, price and quality.

The primary competitors for Ezy-Load are other independent manufacturers of lift gates and light duty cranes for pickup trucks. Price, quality and geographic location are the primary competitive factors for this segment. The Company believes that the ability to provide installation, maintenance service and spare parts are the key elements of enhanced competitiveness.

7

Table of Contents

BACKLOG

Backlog for sales of Test and Conditioning Products, Power Sources and Automotive represents orders for delivery within 12 months from the date on which backlog is reported. Backlog for Services represents orders for services where the ICs to be conditioned and/or tested have been delivered to the Company for processing. The Company’s believes its backlog as of December 31, 2003, is firm, although portions of the backlog are not subject to legally binding agreements.

The following table sets forth the Company’s backlog of its segments at the dates indicated:

EMPLOYEES

As of December 31, 2003, the Company had 88 employees worldwide, of which seven were contract or temporary employees. The Company’s success is in part dependent on its ability to attract and retain its technical staff and skilled employees. During recent years, the Company has experienced a low turnover rate among its U.S. employees. None of the Company’s employees are represented by a labor union. The Company has not experienced any work stoppages and considers its relations with its employees to be good.

INTERNATIONAL OPERATIONS

The Company is domiciled in the United States and operates a service facility in Singapore. It sells products to customers for delivery outside of the U.S. Consequently, the Company is subject to risk customarily found in international business operations, such as fluctuation of currency exchange rates, import and export controls, regulatory policies of foreign governments, longer receivable collection periods and greater difficulty in accounts receivable collections. The Company attempts to conduct its business and financial affairs so as to protect against political and economic risk, but there can be no assurance that the Company will be successful in protecting itself. See Note 4 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for financial information regarding segment reporting and geographic areas.

ENVIRONMENTAL MATTERS

The Company does not expect to be affected by zoning, environmental protection, or other similar laws or ordinances.

SEASONALITY

The Company’s business in not seasonal but is very cyclical, depending on the growth of the semiconductor and electronics equipment industries.

8

Table of Contents

GOVERNMENTAL BUSINESS

The Company does not have a material amount of business with any governmental agency.

Item 2.    Properties.

The Company’s headquarters and principal administrative, engineering and manufacturing facility is located in a 131,000 square foot facility on a seven acre tract of land in Park 10, an office and industrial park located on the west side of Houston, Texas. The Company leased this property until March 1995, when it purchased the property. All indebtedness related to the facility has been paid and all liens released. The Company occupies 96,000 square feet of the facility and leased the remaining 35,000 square feet to an unrelated party until August 2003. The Company is actively seeking a new tenant to occupy this vacant space. The Company’s Services subsidiary is located in a 33,600 square foot facility in Singapore under a lease that expires in 2006.

As of December 31, 2003, the Company also owned a 43,500 square foot facility on a seventeen and one- half acre tract of land in Durham, North Carolina. This facility is debt free and unencumbered. In January of 2003, the Company completed the sale of its San Jose, Costa Rica facility to an unrelated party. The Durham facility is actively being marketed for sale or lease and a portion of the facility is currently leased on a month-to-month basis to an unrelated party.

The Company considers its properties suitable and sufficient for its needs and has no current plans to expand or relocate. See Note 8 to the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements for information concerning leases and Note 11 for financial information on the sale of the Costa Rica facility.

Item 3.    Legal Proceedings.

Not applicable.

Item 4.    Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.

Not applicable.

9

Table of Contents

Item 4A.    Executive Officers of the Registrant.

Executive officers of the Company as of December 31, 2003 were as follows:

Mr. Edwards has been President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company since 1993 and became a Director and Chairman of the Board of Directors in 1995. Mr. Edwards has been employed by the Company in various capacities since 1977.

Mr. Harwell was appointed Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer in July 2003. Mr. Harwell is also responsible for the operations of the Company’s Power Sources and Automotive segments. From November 2002 until July 2003, he served as Executive Vice President and Acting Chief Financial Officer. He was Vice President, Operations from 1996 until 2002, Vice President, Site Services from 1993 until 1996 and the division manager of the automation equipment division of the Company from 1991 to 1993.

Mr. Nesrsta was appointed Vice President, Testing Products—Marketing and Engineering in November 2003. From 1996 until November 2003, he served as Vice President, Sales and Marketing. He was Vice President, Testing Products Marketing from 1993 until 1996 and was manager of the test systems division of the Company for more than five years prior to becoming a vice president in 1993.

Mr. Schmidt joined the Company in December 2002 as Director of Accounting and Finance and was appointed Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Treasurer in July 2003.

10

Table of Contents

PART II

Item 5.    Market for the Registrant’s Common Stock and Related Stockholder Matters.

The common stock of Reliability trades on The Nasdaq Stock Market under the stock symbol REAL. The high and low sale prices for 2003 and 2002, as reported by The Nasdaq Stock Market, are set forth below.

The Company paid no cash dividends in 2003 or 2002. The Company intends to retain earnings for use in its business and therefore does not anticipate paying dividends in the foreseeable future. See Note 3 to the accompanying financial statements, which describes restrictions on the Company’s subsidiary to pay dividends.

The Company has only one class of stock, which is common stock with full voting rights. In 2001, the Company sold and issued shares of common stock to its key employees, officers and directors who exercised stock options. All common stock shares issued under the stock option plan in 2001 were registered under Registration Statements on Form S-8.

Reliability had approximately 691 shareholders of record as of February 16, 2004. Management estimates there are approximately 3,000 beneficial owners of Reliability common stock.

The following table sets forth the number of shares of the Company’s common stock reserved for issuance under the Company’s equity compensation plan as of December 31, 2003:

Shares of Company stock are also used to fund the matching feature of the Employee Stock Savings Plan. See Note 7 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

11

Table of Contents

Item 6.    Selected Financial Data.

The following table sets forth certain selected financial data for the years indicated:

12

Table of Contents

Item 7.    Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

The following discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations of the Company should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements and other related notes that appear in this document.

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and other parts of this document contain forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties, as well as current expectations and assumptions. From time to time, the Company may publish forward-looking statements, including those that are contained in this report, relating to such matters as anticipated financial performance, business prospects, technological developments, new products, research and development activities and similar matters. The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 provides a safe harbor for forward-looking statements. In order to comply with the terms of the safe harbor, the Company notes that a variety of factors could cause the Company’s actual results and experience to differ materially from the anticipated results or other expectations expressed in the Company’s forward-looking statements. The risks and uncertainties that may affect the operations, performance, development and results of the Company’s business include, but are not limited to, adverse changes in the global economy, sudden decreases in the demand for electronic products and semiconductors, market acceptance of the Company’s products and services, the impact of competition, delays in product development schedules, delays due to technical difficulties related to developing and implementing technology, delays in delivery schedules, the ability to attract and maintain sufficient levels of people with specific technical talents, future results related to investments and acquisitions, changes in demand for the Company’s products and services and the Company’s customers’ products and services, the impact of entering a new line of business (Automotive) with different marketing strategies and channels and a different customer base from the Company’s historical business lines, and the ultimate acceptance by the market of this new product. The Company’s actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements, including those set forth elsewhere in this report. The Company assumes no obligation to update any such forward-looking statements.

REVIEW OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

In response to a guidance document that was recently issued by the Securities and Exchange Commission, the Company completed a review of its significant accounting policies, including those listed in Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. The results of the review indicated that the accounting policies that the Company has adopted are appropriate for the operations of the Company and that the Company has correctly applied the accounting policies.

Management’s discussion and analysis of its financial condition and results of operations is based on the Company’s consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. The preparation of these financial statements requires the Company to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses and the related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities, if any exist. The Company evaluates its estimates, on an on-going basis, including those related to inventories, investments, assets held for sale, intangible assets, income taxes, warranty obligations, bad debts, product returns, long-lived assets and contingencies, if any. The Company bases its estimates on historical experience and various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values and disclosure of amounts recorded or disclosed in the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Company.

Management believes the following critical accounting policies affect its more significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of its Consolidated Financial Statements. Policies related to items that are not considered to be material to the Consolidated Financial Statements are not discussed in detail here, but the policies applicable to these items are disclosed in Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

13

Table of Contents

Revenue Recognition

Generally, revenues from the sale of products and services are recognized when products are shipped or services are provided, and the collection of such amount is considered probable. If the Company has unfulfilled obligations under the purchase orders, such as acceptance by the customer, revenue is deferred until such obligations are satisfied, in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.

Inventory Obsolescence

Slow moving inventory is reviewed monthly and the Company writes off or establishes reserves for excess or obsolete inventories based on assumptions about future demand and market conditions and historical obsolescence data. If actual future market conditions are less favorable than those forecasted by management, additional inventory write-downs may be recorded.

Valuation Allowance for Deferred Tax Assets

The Company records a valuation allowance to reduce its deferred tax assets to the amounts that are more likely than not to be realized in the future. The Company and its subsidiary have carried back all eligible operating losses. At a time in the future when profits exceed cumulative losses, the Company will be able to realize tax benefits and the applicable reduction in the valuation allowance will be credited to income in the period that the tax benefit is realized.

Long-Lived Assets and Goodwill

The Company reviews the carrying values of its long-lived assets, including goodwill, whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that such carrying values may not be recoverable, and annually for goodwill as required by SFAS No. 142. An impairment charge is recorded in the event the net book value of such assets exceeds management’s estimate of the future undiscounted cash flows attributable to such assets. Such estimates are based on various assumptions and estimates regarding future operations and are highly judgmental. If such assets are considered impaired, the impairment to be recognized is measured by the amount by which the carrying amount of the assets exceeds the fair value of the assets.

Marketable Securities

The Company owns certain marketable equity securities and records a provision, as a separate component of stockholders equity, to adjust the values of such securities to the quoted market price at each balance sheet date. The Company records an investment impairment charge when it believes an investment has experienced a decline in value that is other than temporary.

Other

The Company establishes allowances or reserves for bad debts, warranty obligations, product returns, and foreign currency gains or losses, and the impact of these items is generally immaterial to the consolidated financial statements because the amounts of the reserves and allowances have been, in the past, and are currently estimated to be, immaterial as they relate to the applicable assets or liabilities and the consolidated financial position of the Company.

14

Table of Contents

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Overview

Reliability’s principal business is designing, manufacturing, and marketing high performance equipment used to condition and test integrated circuits and providing conditioning and test services to manufacturers and large users of integrated circuits. The Company’s business depends significantly on capital equipment expenditures of integrated circuit manufacturers and overall demand for products utilizing integrated circuits. The semiconductor industry is cyclical in nature and the Company is experiencing the lingering effects of a downturn which began in 2001. Conditions in the U.S. and global economy improved in 2003 and semiconductor industry revenues increased by approximately 18%, which made total revenues almost equal to their 2000 peak. Despite this increase in semiconductor revenues, semiconductor manufacturers have yet to resume capital expenditures to historical levels, though significant improvement is forecast for the semiconductor equipment industry in 2004. Semiconductor capital equipment revenues were approximately $30 billion in 2003 and are forecasted to increase by 30% to 50% in 2004. However, even if they increase by 50% in 2004, semiconductor equipment revenues will still be far below 2000 revenues of $61 billion.

Softening demand for the Company’s products and services caused by the 2001 – 2003 downturn has significantly contributed to decreases in revenues and earnings. Management continues to review expenses and take actions to control cost, principally reductions in staffing levels. Despite these challenging times, the Company continues to invest in its future via capital asset investments and research and development in order to position the Company for growth when its markets recover.

The Company entered the automotive aftermarket industry in July 2003 with the acquisition of the Ezy-Load product line. The Company completed development of the prototype in 2003 and conducted market research and analysis and limited sales activities. Revenues from this segment were negligible in 2003. Full-scale marketing activities for this product line will commence in the first quarter of 2004.

Net Revenues

Revenues in 2003 declined 49% from their 2002 levels. Despite this decline in revenues year-over-year, revenues increased sequentially in each of the final three quarters of 2003.

Revenues for the Test and Conditioning Products segment declined as a result of reduced demand for the Company’s CRITERIA and INTERSECT products. Reduced capital spending by the Company’s customers, DRAM overcapacity, reductions in burn-in times by a major customer of the Company’s CRITERIA products, and reduced demand for new CRITERIA systems have adversely affected this segment’s revenues.

Revenues in the Services segment declined during fiscal 2003, 2002, and 2001. The decrease in demand for the services provided by the Company’s Singapore subsidiary are largely the result of memory overcapacity due to the sharp industry downturn, competitive price pressures in an overcapacity market, the loss of a new customer that relocated its production from Singapore in 2001, and significant reductions in burn-in times and a move away from conventional burn-in by a major customer during 2002.

Revenues in the Power Sources segment, though up slightly from their 2002 level, remained at depressed levels due to decreased demand for products sold by the telecommunications industry and competitive price pressures in a challenging market. In many cases, research and development activities of the Company’s Power Sources segment have long lead times, as they relate to components of products that our customers will not place into commercial production for 12 – 24 months. In 2003, the Company began receiving orders for products that were being developed in 2001 and 2002.

15

Table of Contents

Gross Profit

Gross profit consists of net revenues less the cost of the materials, labor and operations overhead used in producing the products and providing the services supplied by the Company. Gross profit decreased $1.1 million in fiscal 2003 compared to fiscal 2002. A decline in the gross margin in the Company’s Testing Products segment of $1.2 million was offset by improvements in the Services and Power Sources segments of $100,000 each. The Power Sources operations operated at a breakeven margin level for the first time since 2000. Despite the Company’s continuing efforts in reducing its cost structure, revenue levels are insufficient to cover fixed and semi-fixed overhead costs and generate a positive gross margin. Additionally, changes in product mix and competitive price pressures, particularly in the Services and Power Sources segments, have unfavorably affected gross profit.

Marketing, General and Administrative

Marketing, general and administrative (“MG&A”) expenses primarily consist of employee salaries and payroll related costs, product promotion and customer support costs, employee and independent sales representative commissions, and legal, accounting and other professional services. MG&A decreased $.8 million or 19%, in fiscal 2003. Expense reductions are largely the result of cost controls and reductions in personnel, resulting in a decrease in payroll cost of $.6 million in fiscal 2003. For 2002, MG&A expenses decreased by $1 million or 19% compared to fiscal year 2001. Payroll costs accounted for $.5 million of this reduction and certain revenue related marketing costs such as warranty reserves, installation cost, and commissions decreased $.4 million as a result of lower revenues.

Research and Development

Research and development (“R&D”) consists primarily of salaries and payroll related costs of employees involved in ongoing product research, design and development activities, engineering supplies, and professional contract design services. The Company’s R&D expense was $1.3 million for fiscal 2003, compared to $2.5 million in 2002 and $2.9 million in 2001. R&D expenses declined in 2003 primarily as a result of staff reductions. R&D expenses declined during 2002 as a result of a $.3 million reduction in professional contract design expenses and a $.1 million reduction in payroll, resulting from reductions in personnel. A significant portion of the Company’s R&D expenditures in the years 2001-2003 is associated with the development activities in the Test and Conditioning Products segment, including the development of the CRITERIA 20, the Company’s next generation micrologic test during burn-in platform that was introduced in July of 2001, and incremental improvements to the existing CRITERIA 18 product line. R&D expenditures for development on new models of power sources decreased by 26% during 2003 after increasing by 13% in 2002. The Company anticipates that it will continue to have significant research and development expenditures in the future to provide new products and enhancements to existing products, including the CRITERIA 20.

Asset Impairments and Restructuring

In response to the continued decline in business activity in the Company’s historical lines of business, the Company reduced its Houston-based workforce by 38% in 2003, incurring severance costs of $488,000. The Company recorded an asset impairment charge of $335,000 in the fourth quarter of 2003 for real estate being held for sale in North Carolina, due to the continued lack of real estate activity in the area, In the same period, an impairment charge of $144,000 was recorded for a portion of work-in-process inventories which may not ultimately be recoverable. In fiscal 2002, management approved restructuring actions in response to the continuing global economic slowdown and to improve the Company’s cost structure through reductions in personnel across all operating segments, the consolidation of the Power Sources operations in Houston and the closure of its facility in Costa Rica. The Company recorded asset impairment and restructuring charges of $2,146,000 to reflect these actions. These charges consisted primarily of severance costs of $667,000, impairment costs of $750,000 on assets held for sale, a $500,000 write-off of a preferred stock investment in a

16

Table of Contents

start-up company, and other related costs. During fiscal 2001, the Company recorded asset impairment charges of $420,000 which consisted of asset impairment costs of $145,000, goodwill impairment costs of $221,000 related to a 1998 acquisition, and a $54,000 write down of a marketable security of a company in bankruptcy. See Note 10 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional financial information regarding impairments and restructuring.

Interest and Other Income

Interest income decreased in each of the years in the period from 2001-2003 due primarily to lower average rates of return on investments and lower cash and investment balances. Other income of $185,000 in 2003 includes a $155,000 gain on the sale of the Company’s former operating facility in Costa Rica and $30,000 from the gain on sales of marketable securities.

Provision for Income Taxes

The Company’s tax benefit rate was 2% in 2003, 42% in 2002 and 15% in 2001. The principal item affecting the Company’s tax rate in 2003 was the inability to record a benefit for the operating losses generated during the year. As of December 31, 2002, the Company had carried back all eligible losses; thus the Company cannot record income tax benefits related to operating losses until future profits are available to offset the losses. The benefit recorded in 2003 related to additional carryback benefits claimed upon filing its 2002 tax return and the elimination of certain deferred tax liabilities. The principal items affecting the Company’s tax rate in 2002 were benefits associated with the dissolution of the Company’s subsidiary in Costa Rica, additional carryback benefits realized as a result of tax legislation enacted in 2002, partially offset by the inability to deduct the losses of the Company’s foreign subsidiaries, and a provision to increase the Company’s valuation allowance on deferred tax assets. The principal items affecting the Company’s tax rate in 2001 were tax benefits not available to a foreign subsidiary due to net operating loss limitations and a lower effective benefit rate related to a loss at the Singapore subsidiary. In addition, the 2001 rate was affected by a valuation allowance related to a capital loss, the fact that a tax benefit was not available for a portion of the Singapore subsidiary’s loss, U.S. tax on a dividend from the Singapore subsidiary and non-deductible goodwill.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

During the past three years, the Company has sustained significant negative financial trends, including substantial decreases in revenues, net income, backlog, and cash flows from operating activities. Key customers have continued to delay or reduce expenditures for the Company’s products and services and such trends may continue in the near term. As discussed more fully in Note 10 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, management has taken steps to restructure the operations of the Company, including shutting down the Costa Rica facility in the third quarter of 2002 and downsizing the Houston and Singapore operations during 2003 and 2002. In addition, significant impairment charges have been recorded during 2003 and 2002 to reflect management’s best estimate of the fair value of certain real estate and other investments and work-in-process inventories.

Though the Company has continued to adjust its cost structure due to the prolonged downturn in its primary business lines, its operations continue to consume large amounts of the Company’s cash reserves. The Company has no debt and $10.2 million in tangible equity at December 31, 2003, $4.5 million of which is in the form of cash. Depending on the Company’s growth, profitability and other factors, including market conditions, the Company may require additional liquidity to sustain operations in 2004. Based on the Company’s current financial position, its outlook for 2004, and additional cash that may be generated through a combination of sale(s) or leases(s) of certain real estate holdings and sales of investment securities, management believes it has sufficient resources to fund its operations through 2004 and into 2005; however, there can be no assurances that such transactions can be consummated in a timely manner or in amounts sufficient to fund any continuing operating deficits.

17

Table of Contents

The Company’s future strategy is primarily dependent on its ability to sell its burn-in and test systems, including its newest generation of burn-in and test systems for medium and high power micrologic devices, the CRITERIA 20. As a result of the downturn of the semiconductor industry which began in 2001, target customers for the CRITERIA line have continued to delay capital expenditures for new capacity, and no sales have been made to date of the CRITERIA 20. Though the Company has seen an increase in customer inquiries regarding the CRITERIA line in the latter portion of 2003, no assurances can be made that such inquiries will result in firm orders in 2004. To a lesser extent, the Company’s future strategy is also dependent on the successful launch of the Ezy-Load product line. Product development, market research and development of a promotional campaign were completed in the fourth quarter of 2003. Advertisements will be placed with various media in the first quarter of 2004. No assurances can be made that the Ezy-Load product will gain market acceptance in commercially viable quantities, or at a commercially viable price.

The Company’s primary source of liquidity has been earnings accumulated prior to 2001. Additionally, in May 2003, the Company received an income tax refund of $3.7 million resulting from the carryback of its 2002 operating loss. As of December 31, 2003, the Company’s working capital was $4.9 million, of which $4.5 million was cash and short-term investments. Changes in the Company’s financial condition and liquidity during the three year period ended December 31, 2003 are generally attributable to (1) operating losses sustained in each of the years, including the effects of significant research and development expenditures while experiencing a decline in revenues during each year, (2) the acquisition of the Ezy-Load product line in 2003, (3) the repurchase of 274,000 shares of common stock during fiscal 2001, and (4) capital expenditures for property and equipment, primarily related to equipment purchases for the Company’s Singapore facility.

Net cash used by operating activities for the year ended December 31, 2003 was $1.8 million, compared to $5.6 million used by operations during 2002 and $.5 million provided by operations in 2001. In 2003, the principal items affecting operating cash flow were the net loss of $6.5 million, offset by the tax refund received of $3.7 million, depreciation expense of $.8 million and the non-cash portion of the provision for impairment, restructuring and severance costs of $.4 million. For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002, the principal items affecting operating cash flow were the net loss of $5.1 million, offset by depreciation expense of $1.1 million, the non-cash portion of the provision for impairment, restructuring and severance costs of $1.4 million and a decrease in accounts receivable of $0.4 million. Operating cash flow was also impacted by the increase in refundable income taxes of $3.3 million, which were not received until the second quarter of 2003.

Investing activities generated cash of $.1 million in 2003 and consumed cash of $.6 million in 2002 and $1.7 million in 2001. In 2003, the sale of the Company’s former operating facility in Costa Rica generated cash of $.8 million, which was offset by expenditures associated with the acquisition of the Ezy-Load product line of $.5 million and capital expenditures for property and equipment of $.3 million. Net cash used for fiscal 2002 was primarily capital expenditures for property and equipment of $.6 million, compared to $1.6 million in 2001.

In February 2000, the Company announced a plan to repurchase up to 1.5 million shares of its common stock. As of December 31, 2003, the Company has repurchased a total of 354,300 shares (274,600 in 2001 and 79,700 in 2000). The net cash used in this financing activity was $0.8 million in 2001 and $0.3 million in 2000. The number of shares purchased was affected by the Company limiting purchases to prices below certain per share amounts and certain regulatory requirements, including daily volume limitations. Although the Company did not repurchase additional shares during 2003 or 2002, it may do so from time to time in the future, if appropriate, subject to various factors, including market conditions and cash requirements to support operations.

The Company’s Singapore subsidiary maintains a $0.5 million line of credit facility to support the subsidiary’s credit commitments. As of December 31, 2003, $0.1 million of the commitment was being utilized under letter of credit commitments in lieu of a deposit on the leased building.

The Company, from time to time, evaluates potential acquisitions of businesses, products, and technologies that complement the Company’s business. Any such transactions, if consummated, may use a portion of the Company’s working capital or require the issuance of equity. The Company has no present commitments or agreements with respect to any acquisitions.

18

Table of Contents

CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS

Presented in the table below are the contractual obligations of the Company as of December 31, 2003:

The Company has a contingent liability to make future payments in connection with its purchase of the Ezy-Load product line. See Note 12 of the accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements.

Certain ratios and amounts monitored by management in evaluating the Company’s financial resources and performance are presented in the following table:

FACTORS THAT MAY AFFECT FUTURE RESULTS

Liquidity

The Company has sustained significant operating losses in each of the past three years. During this period, cash and equivalents have declined from $14.3 million to $4.5 million, and the Company has maintained its debt-free status. Management has taken several steps during this period to adjust the Company’s cost structure and align it with the level of business activity while continuing to fund key research and development activities. As previously discussed, the Company may generate additional liquidity in 2004 through a combination of sale(s) or lease(s) of certain idle real estate holdings and sales of investment securities. The inability to consummate the(se) real estate transaction(s) could limit the Company’s ability to fund the working capital and capital expenditure requirements of any significant increase in business activity and to fund research and development activities which are essential in developing new products.

Dependence on Key Customers

A significant portion of the Company’s net sales is attributable to a few customers. The Company’s ability to maintain or increase its sales in the future will depend in part upon its ability to obtain orders from existing and new customers as well as the financial success of its existing customers. There can be no assurances that the Company will be able to maintain or increase the level of its revenues in the future or that the Company will be

19

Table of Contents

able to retain existing customers or to attract new customers. Because the Company’s products and services have been extensively customized to different key customer requirements, the market for such products and services may be limited. In addition, since development costs for such products are high, the Company only develops products for, and provides services to, customers that it believes have the financial capacity to buy large enough quantities of products to provide the Company a return on its investment.

Cyclical Nature of the Semiconductor Industry

The Company’s revenues, gross margins and net income depend significantly on capital equipment expenditures of manufacturers of integrated circuits (“ICs”) and products utilizing ICs. The semiconductor industry is cyclical in nature and has experienced periodic downturns which can have a severe effect on the demand for capital equipment. The current and prior semiconductor industry downturns, oversupply, and excess production capacity have adversely affected demand for products and services sold by the Company. The need to continue investment in research and development and maintain customer service and support capability may limit the Company’s ability to reduce expenses.

Rapid Technological Changes and Product Development

Rapid technological advances resulting in changing customer requirements and evolving industry standards requiring frequent new product introductions and enhancements characterize the semiconductor industry. The Company’s future success will depend in large part on its ability to enhance its current products and to develop and introduce new products that keep pace with technological developments, achieve market acceptance and respond to constantly evolving customer requirements. The Company will need to continue to make substantial investments in research and product development in order to respond to rapid technological changes and to develop and introduce new products to meet customers’ expanding needs and evolving industry standards. Any failure by the Company to anticipate or respond adequately to technological developments and customer requirements or any significant delays in product development or introduction could result in a loss of competitiveness and could have a material adverse effect on the Company. There can be no assurance that the Company will successfully develop and manufacture new products or that any product enhancements or new products developed by the Company will gain market acceptance.

Competition

The markets in which the Company’s products and services are sold are subject to intense competition and are characterized by rapidly changing technology. The Company’s competitors can be expected to continue to improve the design and performance of their products and to introduce new products with competitive price and performance characteristics. Competitive pressures often necessitate price reductions that can adversely affect operating results. Although the Company believes that it has certain technological and other advantages over its competitors, maintaining such advantages will require a continued high level of investment by the Company in research and development, marketing and service. There can be no assurance that the Company will be able to compete successfully in the future.

Fluctuation of Operating Results

The Company’s operating results fluctuate on a quarterly and annual basis because of a number of factors. Not only does the cyclical nature of the semiconductor industry affect the Company’s operating results, but the status of world economic conditions and the timing of product shipments can also affect results. For example, because the Company’s test and conditioning products have relatively high unit prices, the acceleration or delay of a small number of shipments from one quarter to the next can significantly affect the Company’s operating results for that quarter or that year.

20

Table of Contents

Dependence on Skilled Employees

The Company is dependent, in part, on its ability to attract and retain highly skilled managerial, marketing and technical personnel, including skilled applications and sales engineers. There can be no assurance that the Company will continue to be successful in attracting and retaining the personnel it requires to design, manufacture, market and support new and enhanced products and services.

Limited Sources of Supplies

Although there is more than one potential supplier of all material component parts for the Company’s products, the Company currently relies on a single source of supply for several components. In most cases, the Company is not a significant purchaser of raw materials from its suppliers and therefore has little control over either the availability or pricing of component parts. Accordingly, the Company is vulnerable to delays in shipments caused by either a business interruption of a supplier or an undersupply of parts, and the Company could experience production delays while an alternate supplier is procured. Such delays, if encountered for an extended period, could have a material adverse effect on the Company.

Intellectual Property

The Company attempts to protect its intellectual property through patents, copyrights, trade secrets, trademarks, and other means The Company believes however, that its success will depend to a greater extent upon innovation, technological expertise, service after the sale and customer relationships. There can be no assurances that the Company will be able to protect its proprietary rights or that competitors will not be able to develop similar or superior technology independently. No assurance can be given that the claims allowed on any patents held by the Company will be sufficiently broad to protect the Company’s technology. No assurance can be given that any patents issued to the Company will not be challenged, invalidated or circumvented or that the rights granted thereunder will provide competitive advantages to the Company or that third parties’ patents will not adversely affect the Company.

International Operations

The Company operates a service facility in Singapore and has export sales from its Texas-based headquarters for delivery outside of the U.S. Consequently, the Company is subject to risk customarily found in international business operations, such as fluctuation of currency exchange rates, import and export controls, regulatory policies of foreign governments, longer receivable collection periods and greater difficulty in accounts receivable collections. The Company attempts to conduct its business and financial affairs so as to protect against political and economic risk, but there can be no assurance that the Company will be successful in protecting itself.

Success of Ezy-Load Product Launch

The Company is entering a new market (Automotive) through the launch of a new product (Ezy-Load) that, from a marketing standpoint, is dissimilar from its traditional lines of business. There can be no assurance that the Company will be able to market this product successfully to a new customer base or that the product will achieve market acceptance at sustainable prices.

Item 7A.    Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk.

The Company does not engage in speculative transactions and does not use derivative instruments or engage in hedging activities. See the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for a description of the Company’s accounting policies and other information related to these financial instruments.

21

Table of Contents

In the normal course of business the Company is exposed to market risks, including changes in interest rates, foreign currency exchange rates, and equity price changes that could impact the Company’s operating results. As of December 31, 2003, fluctuations in interest rates, exchange rates, and equity price changes would not have significant material effect on the Company’s financial position or operating results. The sensitivity analyses below do not consider the effects that such adverse changes may have on overall economic activity, nor do they consider additional actions management may take to mitigate the Company’s exposure to such changes.

Interest Rate Risk

The Company places its short-term investments, which generally have a term of less than 90 days, with high quality financial institutions, limits the amount of credit exposure to any one institution, and has investment guidelines relative to diversification and maturities designed to maintain safety and liquidity. As of December 31, 2003, the Company had short-term investments totaling $3.9 million. Due to the short-term nature of these instruments, the carrying value approximates market value. If, during 2004, average short-term interest rates decrease by 1.0% over 2003 average rates, the Company’s projected interest income from short-term investments would decrease by approximately $57,000, assuming a similar level of investments in 2004.

Equity Price Risk

As of December 31, 2003, the Company held marketable equity securities with aggregate fair market values of $231,000. In the event that the carrying value of the Company’s equity investment exceeds its fair market value, and the decline in value is determined to be other than temporary, the carrying value is reduced to its current fair market value. Had market prices of such securities declined 10% as of December 31, 2003, the market values of these instruments would have decreased $23,000.

Foreign Currency Risk

The Company has a subsidiary located in Singapore. The subsidiary’s functional currency and a significant portion of the assets, including cash investments, are denominated in U.S. dollars. During fiscal 2003, approximately 70% of its Singapore subsidiary’s revenues and 30% of its expenses were denominated in U.S. dollars. The balance of revenues and expenses were denominated in Singapore dollars. Historically, fluctuations in the Singapore dollar/U.S. dollar exchange rates have not had a material effect on the Company. The effects of foreign currency exchange rates were a gain of $3,000, a loss of $38,000, and a gain of $25,000 in fiscal 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively.

22

Table of Contents

Item 8.    Consolidated Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.

INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULE

All other schedules are omitted since the required information is not present, or is not present in amounts sufficient to require submission of the schedule, or because the information required is included in the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto.

F-1

Table of Contents

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

The Board of Directors and Stockholders

Reliability Incorporated

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Reliability Incorporated as of December 31, 2003 and 2002, and the related consolidated statements of operations, cash flows and stockholders’ equity for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2003. Our audits also included the financial statement schedule listed in the Index on page F-1. These financial statements and schedule are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and schedule based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Reliability Incorporated at December 31, 2003 and 2002, and the consolidated results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2003, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. Also, in our opinion, the related financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all material respects the information set forth therein.

Houston, Texas

January 26, 2004

F-2

Table of Contents

RELIABILITY INCORPORATED

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(In thousands, except share data)

See accompanying notes.

F-3

Table of Contents

RELIABILITY INCORPORATED

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(In thousands, except per share data)

See accompanying notes.

F-4

Table of Contents

RELIABILITY INCORPORATED

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(In thousands)

See accompanying notes.

F-5

Table of Contents

RELIABILITY INCORPORATED

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

Years Ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001

(In thousands)