Back to GetFilings.com

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003

Commission File Number 1-5869-1

SUPERIOR UNIFORM GROUP, INC.

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12 (b) of the Act:

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.    x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 12b-2).    Yes  ¨    No  x

As of March 1, 2004, 7,400,312 common shares were outstanding, and the aggregate market value of the registrant’s common shares held by non-affiliates was approximately $58 million (based on the closing sale price of the registrant’s common shares on the American Stock Exchange on the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter (June 30, 2003) ). Shares of common stock held by each executive officer and director have been excluded in that such persons may be deemed to be affiliates. The determination of affiliate status is not necessarily a conclusive determination for other purposes.

Documents Incorporated by Reference:

Portions of the Registrant’s Proxy Statement to be filed on or before March 30, 2004, for its Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held May 7, 2004, are incorporated by reference to furnish the information required by Items 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14 of Part III.

Exhibit index may be found on Page 32.

PART I

Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

References in this report to “the Company”, “Superior”, “we”, “our”, or “us” mean Superior Uniform Group, Inc. together with its subsidiary, except where the context otherwise requires. Certain matters discussed in this Form 10-K are “forward-looking statements” intended to qualify for the safe harbors from liability established by the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These forward-looking statements can generally be identified as such because the context of the statement will include words such as we “believe,” “anticipate”,” expect” or words of similar import. Similarly, statements that describe our future plans, objectives, strategies or goals are also forward-looking statements. Such forward-looking statements are subject to certain risks and uncertainties that may materially adversely affect the anticipated results. Such risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited, to the following: general economic conditions in the areas of the United States in which the Company’s customers are located; changes in the healthcare, resort and commercial industries where uniforms and service apparel are worn; the impact of competition; our ability to successfully integrate operations following consummation of acquisitions and the availability of manufacturing materials. Shareholders, potential investors and other readers are urged to consider these factors carefully in evaluating the forward-looking statements made herein and are cautioned not to place undue reliance on such forward-looking statements. The forward-looking statements made herein are only made as of the date of this Form 10-K and we disclaim any obligation to publicly update such forward-looking statements to reflect subsequent events or circumstances.

Item 1. Business

Superior Uniform Group, Inc. was organized in 1920 and was incorporated in 1922 as a New York company under the name Superior Surgical Mfg. Co., Inc. In 1998, the Company changed its name to Superior Uniform Group, Inc. and its state of incorporation to Florida. Superior’s business has not changed in any significant way during the past five years.

Although Superior operates for selling, promotional and other reasons through various divisions, nevertheless there are no significant distinct segments or lines of business; approximately 95% of its business consists of the sale of uniforms and service apparel, and miscellaneous products directly related thereto.

Products

Superior manufactures and sells a wide range of apparel and accessories for the medical and health fields as well as for the industrial, commercial, leisure, and public safety markets. Its principal products are:

Uniforms and service apparel account for 90-95% of total sales and revenues; no other single class of product listed above accounts for more than 10% of total sales and revenues.

2

Competition

Superior competes with national and regional manufacturers and also with local firms in most major metropolitan areas. Superior competes with more than three dozen firms including divisions of larger corporations. The nature and degree of competition varies with the customer and market where it occurs. Industry statistics are not available, but we believe that Superior is one of the leading suppliers of garments to hospitals and industrial clean rooms, hotels and motels, food service establishments and uniforms to linen suppliers. Superior experiences competition primarily in the areas of product development, styling and pricing.

Customers

Superior has a substantial number of customers, the largest of which accounted for no more than 5% of its 2003 sales.

Backlog

Although Superior at all times has a substantial backlog of orders, we do not consider this significant since our backlog of orders at any time consists primarily of recurrent firm orders being processed and filled.

Superior normally completes shipments of orders from stock between 1 and 2 weeks after their receipt. As of March 1, 2004, the backlog of all orders that we believe to be firm was approximately $5,038,000, compared to approximately $4,132,000 a year earlier.

Inventory

Superior markets itself to its customers as a “stock house”. Therefore, Superior at all times carries substantial inventories of raw materials (principally piece goods) and finished garments which requires substantial working capital. Superior’s principal raw materials are textile products, generally available from a number of sources.

Intellectual Property

While Superior owns and uses several trademarks, its mark “Fashion Seal Uniforms” (presently registered until August 7, 2007, subject to renewal) is important since more than 50% of Superior’s products are sold under that name.

Environmental Matters

In view of the nature of our business, compliance with federal, state, or local laws regulating the discharge of materials into the environment, or otherwise relating to the protection of the environment, has had no material effect upon our operations or earnings and we do not expect it to have a material impact in the future.

Employees

Superior employed 897 persons as of December 31, 2003.

Item 2. Properties

The Company has an ongoing program designed to maintain and improve its facilities. Generally, all properties are in satisfactory condition. The Company’s properties are currently fully utilized (except as otherwise noted), and have aggregate productive capacity to meet the Company’s present needs as well as those of the foreseeable future. The material manufacturing locales are rented for nominal amounts due to cities providing incentives for manufacturers to locate in their area - all such properties may be purchased for nominal amounts. As a result, it is believed that the subject lease expirations and renewal terms thereof are not material. Set forth below are the locations of our facilities:

3

Item 3. Legal Proceedings

None.

Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

PART II

Item 5. Market Price of and Dividends on Superior’s Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters.

The principal market on which Superior’s common shares are traded is the American Stock Exchange; said shares have also been admitted to unlisted trading on the Midwest Stock Exchange.

The table below presents, for our common shares, dividend information and the quarterly high and low sales prices as reported in the consolidated transaction reporting system of the American Stock Exchange.

Our long-term debt agreements include covenants that, among other things, restrict dividends payable by us. Under the most restrictive debt agreement, retained earnings of approximately $14,255,000 were available at December 31, 2003 for declaration of dividends. We have declared cash dividends of $.135 per share in each of the quarters for the fiscal years ending December 31, 2002 and 2003. We expect that, so long as earnings and business conditions warrant, we will continue to pay dividends and that the amount thereof, as such conditions permit, and as the Directors approve, will increase from time to time.

On March 1, 2004, registrant had 285 shareholders of record and the closing price for registrant’s common shares on the American Stock Exchange was $15.20 per share.

4

Equity Compensation Plan Information

The following table provides information about our common stock that may be issued upon the exercise of options, warrants, rights and restricted stock under all our existing equity compensation plans as of December 31, 2003, including the 1993 Incentive Stock Option Plan and the 2003 Incentive Stock and Awards Plan:

5

Item 6. Selected Financial Data

6

Item 7. Management’ s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

OPERATIONS: In 2003 net sales decreased 7.4% in comparison to 2002 and in 2002 net sales decreased 5.4% in comparison to 2001. These decreases were attributed to the continued economic slowdown as our customers postponed or cancelled orders in an effort to reduce the impact of the slowdown on their own operations.

As a percentage of sales, cost of goods sold were 64.2% in 2003, 65.7% in 2002 and in 2001. The decrease in 2003 was attributed to the continued transition of production to offshore sources.

As a percentage of sales, selling and administrative expenses were 28.8% in 2003, 28.2% in 2002, and 26.6% in 2001. The increase in this percentage in 2003 is attributed to the overall decline in sales volume more than offsetting the impact of staffing and other cost reductions on selling administrative expenses. The increase in this percentage in 2002 is attributed to the following factors: the overall decline in sales volume more than offset the impact of staff reductions on selling administrative expenses; selling and administrative expenses for 2002 included bad debt expense of approximately $1,165,000 versus $584,000 in the prior year due primarily to the write off of one large account in 2002; during 2002, the Company incurred approximately $360,000 in costs associated with the review of a potential acquisition that we are no longer pursuing; and finally, the 2001 selling and administrative expenses were reduced by a gain of $1,683,000 recorded as a result of the settlement of vendor matters.

Interest expense as a percentage of sales was 0.5% in 2003, 0.6% in 2002, and 1.1% in 2001. The decreases in 2003 and 2002 are due to lower average borrowings outstanding and lower interest rates.

The effective income tax rate in 2003 was 35.2%; in 2002 it was 36.2%; and in 2001 it was 36.6%. The decreases are primarily attributed to decreases in state income taxes.

In 2003, the Company reported earnings before cumulative effect of change in accounting principle of 4.3% of sales with a return of 6.9% on average shareholders’ equity. In 2002, the Company reported earnings before cumulative effect of change in accounting principle of 3.5% of sales with a return of 6.3% on average shareholders’ equity. In 2001, the Company reported earnings before cumulative effect of change in accounting principle of 4.2% of sales with a return of 7.9% on average shareholders’ equity.

The cumulative effect of change in accounting principle charge in the amount of $4,504,563, net of tax benefit of $2,560,000 was recognized in 2002 as a result of the Company’s adoption of FAS No. 142. The Company completed its transitional impairment testing of goodwill during 2002 and determined that its goodwill for certain reporting units was impaired.

In 2003, the Company reported net income of 4.3% of sales with a return of 6.9% on average shareholders’ equity. In 2002, the Company reported net income of 0.4% of sales with a return of 0.7% on average shareholders’ equity. In 2001, the Company reported net income of 4.2% of sales with a return of 7.9% on average shareholders’ equity.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES: The Company uses a number of standards for its own purposes in measuring its liquidity, such as: working capital, profitability ratios, long-term debt as a percentage of long-term debt and equity, and activity ratios. In its computations, as in this report, all inventory figures are on a FIFO basis.

The working capital of the Company at December 31, 2003 was approximately $66,213,000 and the working capital ratio, 6.7:1; for 2002, it was approximately $61,689,000 and the working capital ratio, 6.1:1. The Company has operated without hindrance or restraint with its present working capital, believing that income generated from operations and outside sources of credit, both trade and institutional, are more than adequate to fund the Company’s operations.

In 2003, the Company’s percentage of total debt to total debt and equity was 8.1% and in 2002 it was 9.6%. The decrease is attributed primarily to decreased borrowings under the Company’s borrowing agreements as a result of the reduced working capital requirements in 2003.

The Company has an on-going capital expenditure program designed to maintain and improve its facilities. Capital expenditures were approximately $2,051,000, $2,820,000, and $1,349,000, in the years 2003, 2002, and 2001, respectively. The Company at all times evaluates its capital expenditure programs in light of prevailing economic conditions. During 2004, the Company anticipates completing an upgrade of its central warehouse distribution system in Eudora, Arkansas. This project has an expected total cost of approximately $4,600,000 and is expected to be completed during the fourth quarter of 2004.

7

Management’ s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (con’t)

During the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2002, the Company paid cash dividends of approximately $3,895,000 and $3,818,000, respectively, on a quarterly dividend of $.135 per share. The Company reacquired and retired 35,000 and 16,000 of its common shares in the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively, with costs of $366,000 and $178,000, respectively. The Company anticipates that it will repurchase additional shares of its common stock in the future as financial conditions allow.

In 2003, cash and cash equivalents increased by $7,444,000. This increase is attributed to approximately $12,826,000 in cash provided from operations, offset by approximately $2,688,000 utilized in investing activities and approximately $2,693,000 utilized in financing activities.

In 2002, cash and cash equivalents increased by $4,256,000. This increase is attributed to approximately $18,816,000 in cash provided from operations, offset by approximately $3,855,000 utilized in investing activities and approximately $10,706,000 utilized in financing activities.

On March 26, 1999, the Company entered into a 3-year credit agreement with Wachovia Bank that made available to the Company up to $15,000,000 on a revolving credit basis. Interest is payable at LIBOR plus 0.60% based upon the one-month LIBOR rate for U.S. dollar based borrowings (1.72% at December 31, 2003). The Company pays an annual commitment fee of 0.15% on the average unused portion of the commitment. The available balance under the credit agreement is reduced by outstanding letters of credit. As of December 31, 2003, approximately $154,000 was outstanding under letters of credit. On March 27, 2001, the Company entered into an agreement with Wachovia Bank to extend the maturity of the revolving credit agreement. The revolving credit agreement matures on March 26, 2004. At the option of the Company, any outstanding balance on the agreement at that date will convert to a one-year term loan. The remaining terms of the original revolving credit agreement remain unchanged. The Company has received a verbal commitment from its lender to renew the revolving credit agreement for an additional 3-year period on terms substantially the same as the existing agreement. The Company also entered into a $12,000,000 10-year term loan on March 26, 1999 with the same bank. The term loan is an amortizing loan, with monthly payments of principal and interest, maturing on April 1, 2009. The term loan carries a variable interest rate of LIBOR plus 0.80% based upon the one-month LIBOR rate for U.S. dollar based borrowings. Concurrent with the execution of the term loan agreement, the Company entered into an interest rate swap with the bank under which the Company receives a variable rate of interest on a notional amount equal to the outstanding balance of the term loan from the bank and the Company pays a fixed rate of 6.75% on a notional amount equal to the outstanding balance of the term loan to the bank.

On October 16, 2000, the Company entered into a 5-year term loan with Wachovia Bank. The term loan was an amortizing loan, with monthly payments of principal in the amount of $83,333 plus interest, scheduled to mature on November 1, 2005. The term loan carried a variable interest rate of LIBOR plus 0.80% based upon the one-month LIBOR rate for U.S. dollar based borrowings. The proceeds of this term loan were utilized to reduce the outstanding balance on the Company’s revolving credit agreement. Concurrent with the execution of the new term loan agreement, Wachovia Bank and the Company amended the March 26, 1999 term loan and the revolving credit agreement to revise the net worth requirements. The net worth requirements included below reflect this amendment. This term loan was paid in full in June 2001.

The credit agreement and the term loans with Wachovia Bank contain restrictive provisions concerning debt to net worth ratios, other borrowings, capital expenditures, rental commitments, tangible net worth ($70,535,000 at December 31, 2003); working capital ratio (2.5:1), fixed charges coverage ratio (2.5:1), stock repurchases and payment of dividends. At December 31, 2003, under the most restrictive terms of the debt agreements, retained earnings of approximately $14,255,000 were available for declaration of dividends. The Company is in full compliance with all terms, conditions and covenants of the various credit agreements.

The Company prepaid the balance of its 6.65% note payable to MassMutual, including a prepayment penalty of approximately $285,000, on March 18, 2002 utilizing cash balances on hand as of December 31, 2001 and additional cash generated from operations in the first quarter of 2002. With funds from the credit agreement, anticipated cash flows generated from operations and other credit sources readily available, the Company believes that its liquidity is satisfactory, its working capital adequate and its capital resources sufficient for funding its ongoing capital expenditure program and its operations, including planned expansion for 2004.

8

Management’ s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (con’t)

The following table summarizes our fixed cash obligations as of December 31, 2003 for the fiscal years ending December 31:

The Company does not engage in any off-balance sheet financing arrangements. In particular, we do not have any interest in so-called limited purpose entities, which include special purpose entities and structured finance entities.

Critical Accounting Policies

Our significant accounting policies are described in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002. Our discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations are based upon our condensed consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for the preparation of interim financial statements. The preparation of the financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues, expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. On an on-going basis, we evaluate the estimates that we have made. These estimates are based upon our historical experience and on various other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances. Our actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. We believe the following critical accounting policies affect our more significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of our condensed consolidated financial statements.

Revenue Recognition and Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

The Company recognizes revenue in the period in which the product is shipped. Judgments and estimates are used in determining the collectability of accounts receivable. The Company analyzes specific accounts receivable and historical bad debt experience, customer credit worthiness, current economic trends and the age of outstanding balances when evaluating the adequacy of the allowance for doubtful accounts. Management judgments and estimates are used in connection with establishing the allowance in any accounting period. Changes in estimates are reflected in the period they become known. If the financial condition of the Company’s customers were to deteriorate, resulting in an impairment of their ability to make payments, additional allowances may be required. Material differences may result in the amount and timing of bad debt expense recognition for any given period if management makes different judgments or utilizes different estimates.

Inventories

Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market value. Judgments and estimates are used in determining the likelihood that new goods on hand can be sold to customers. Historical inventory usage and current revenue trends are considered in estimating both excess and obsolete inventories. If actual product demand and market conditions are less favorable than those projected by management, additional inventory write-downs may be required.

9

Management’ s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (con’t)

Insurance

The Company self-insures for certain obligations related to health and workers’ compensation programs. The Company also purchases stop-loss insurance policies to protect it from catastrophic losses. Judgments and estimates are used in determining the potential value associated with reported claims and for losses that have occurred, but have not been reported. The Company’s estimates consider historical claim experience and other factors. The Company’s liabilities are based on estimates, and, while the Company believes that the accrual for loss is adequate, the ultimate liability may be in excess of or less than the amounts recorded. Changes in claim experience, the Company’s ability to settle claims or other estimates and judgments used by management could have a material impact on the amount and timing of expense for any period.

RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS: In December 2002, the FASB issued FAS No. 148, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation — Transition and Disclosure. FAS No. 148 amends FAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, to provide alternative voluntary methods of transition to the fair value method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation. In addition, FAS No. 148 amends the disclosure provisions of FAS No. 123 to require disclosure in the summary of significant accounting policies of the effects of an entity’s accounting policy with respect to stock-based employee compensation on the reported net income and earnings per share in annual and interim financial statements. FAS No. 148 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 31, 2002. The Company elected not to change to the fair value based method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation. The Company adopted the disclosure provisions of FAS No. 148 for the quarter ending March 31, 2003. The adoption of FAS No. 148 has not had a material impact on the Company’s financial position and results of operations.

On January 17, 2003, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Interpretation No. 46, Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities (“FIN No. 46”). FIN No. 46 addresses consolidation of entities that are not controlled through voting interests or in which the equity investors do not bear the residual economic risks and rewards. These entities have been commonly referred to as special purpose entities. FIN No. 46 provides guidance related to identifying variable interest entities and determining whether such entities should be consolidated. It also provides guidance related to the initial and subsequent measurement of assets, liabilities and non-controlling interests in newly consolidated variable interest entities and requires disclosures for both the primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity and other beneficiaries of the entity. To date, the Company has not created any variable interest entities.

In April 2003, the FASB issued FAS No. 149, Amendment of Statement 133 on Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities , which amends and clarifies accounting for derivative instruments, including certain derivative instruments embedded in other contracts and for hedging activities under FAS No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities. FAS No. 149 is generally effective for derivative instruments, including derivative instruments embedded in certain contracts, entered into or modified after June 30, 2003 and for hedging relationships designated after June 30, 2003. The adoption of FAS No. 149 has not had a material impact on the Company’s financial position and results of operations.

In May 2003, the FASB issued FAS No. 150, Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Characteristics of both Liabilities and Equity. FAS No. 150 establishes standards for how to classify and measure certain financial instruments with characteristics of both liabilities and equity. FAS No. 150 is effective for financial instruments entered into or modified after May 31, 2003, and otherwise is effective at the beginning of the first interim period beginning after June 15, 2003. The adoption of FAS No. 150 has not had a material impact on the Company’s financial position and results of operations.

Item 7a. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risks

The Company is exposed to market risk from changes in interest rates, which may adversely affect its results of operations and financial condition. The Company seeks to minimize the risks from these interest rates when considered appropriate, through the limited use of derivative financial instruments. The Company’s policy is to not use financial instruments for trading or other speculative purposes and is not a party to any leveraged financial instruments. The Company has debt obligations with variable interest rates tied to LIBOR which are described in “Liquidity and Capital Resources” as well as Note 5 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. The Company estimates that a hypothetical increase in interest rates of 1% would have resulted in an insignificant increase in the Company’s interest expense for the year ended December 31, 2003.

10

Management’ s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (con’t)

The Company has one interest rate swap agreement to hedge against the potential impact on earnings from increases in market interest rates of a variable rate term loan. Under the interest rate swap agreement, the Company receives or makes payments on a monthly basis, based on the differential between a specified interest rate and one month LIBOR. A term loan of $7,445,068 is designated as a hedged item for interest rate swaps at December 31, 2003.

This interest rate swap is accounted for as a cash flow hedge in accordance with FAS 133 and FAS 138. As of the report date, the swap met the effectiveness test, and as such no gains or losses were included in net income during the year related to hedge ineffectiveness and there was no income adjustment related to any portion excluded from the assessment of hedge effectiveness. A gain of $256,000 associated with this interest rate swap agreement was included in other comprehensive income for the year ended December 31, 2003. A loss of $464,000 was included in other comprehensive loss for the year ended December 31, 2002. A loss of $440,000, which includes the transition adjustment of $48,000, was included in other comprehensive loss for the year ended December 31, 2001. The fair market values of the interest rate swap of $648,000 and $904,000 are included in accrued expenses in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively. The original term of the contract is ten years.

The Company is also exposed to changes in prevailing market interest rates affecting the return on its investments but does not consider this interest rate market risk exposure to be material to its financial condition or results of operations. The Company invests primarily in highly liquid debt instruments with strong credit ratings and short-term (less than three months) maturities.

11

Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

Superior Uniform Group, Inc. and Subsidiary

Consolidated Statements of Earnings

Years Ended December 31,

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

12

Superior Uniform Group, Inc. and Subsidiary

Consolidated Balance Sheets

December 31,

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

13

Superior Uniform Group, Inc. and Subsidiary

Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity

Years Ended December 31,

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

14

Superior Uniform Group, Inc. and Subsidiary

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

Years Ended December 31,