Back to GetFilings.com

Table of Contents

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

(Mark One)

or

Commission file number 0-25721

BUCA, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

1300 Nicollet Mall, Suite 5003

Minneapolis, Minnesota 55403

(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip code)

(612) 288-2382

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

None

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

common stock, par value $.01 per share.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.  Yes  x  No  ¨

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 12b-2).  Yes  x  No  ¨

The aggregate market value of the common stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant as of June 27, 2003 (the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter) was $89,883,236 based on the closing sale price for BUCA, Inc.’s common stock on that date. Shares of common stock held by each officer and director have been excluded from this computation in that such persons may be deemed to be affiliates. This number is provided only for the purpose of this report on Form 10-K and does not represent an admission by either the registrant or any such person as to the status of such person.

As of March 8, 2004 the registrant had 20,120,437 shares of common stock outstanding.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

Portions of the registrant’s definitive proxy statement for the annual meeting of shareholders to be held on May 4, 2004 are incorporated by reference in Part III.

Table of Contents

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

The information presented in this Annual Report on Form 10-K contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). These forward-looking statements have been made pursuant to the provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements are not historical facts, but rather are based on our current expectations, estimates and projections, and our beliefs and assumptions. We intend words such as “anticipates,” “expects,” “intends,” “plans,” “believes,” “seeks,” “estimates,” “will” and similar expressions to identify forward-looking statements. These statements are not guarantees of future performance and are subject to certain risks, uncertainties and other factors, some of which are beyond our control and are difficult to predict. These factors could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or forecasted in the forward-looking statements. These risks and uncertainties are described in the risk factors and elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. We caution you not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which reflect our management’s view only as of the date of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. We are not obligated to update these statements or publicly release the result of any revisions to them to reflect events or circumstances after the date of this Annual Report on Form 10-K or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events.

PART I

Overview

BUCA, Inc. owns and operates 105 full service restaurants under the names Buca di Beppo and Vinny T’s of Boston. Our Buca di Beppo restaurants offer high quality, immigrant Southern Italian cuisine served in small and large family-style portions meant for sharing in a fun and energetic atmosphere that parodies the decor and ambiance of post-War Italian/American restaurants. In prior years, our Buca di Beppo restaurants have been dinner only. In 2003, we began to serve lunch seven days per week at certain Buca di Beppo restaurants. Currently, 11 Buca di Beppo restaurants serve lunch. We expect to have approximately 25% of our Buca di Beppo restaurants serve lunch within the next 12 months.

Our Vinny T’s of Boston restaurants are based upon re-creations of the high quality neighborhood Italian eateries prominent in the neighborhoods of lower Manhattan, Brooklyn, north-end Boston and South Philadelphia in the 1940s. The menu includes both individual and family-sized portions.

We design each of our restaurants to be a fun, high-energy destination. Each Buca di Beppo and Vinny T’s of Boston restaurant in a market is unique, which reinforces our image as a collection of neighborhood restaurants. Our food, decor and family-style servings all promote a fun, celebratory and socially interactive dining experience that emulates a traditional Italian/American meal. We have pursued a rapid, but disciplined expansion strategy. In fiscal 2004, we have slowed down our restaurant development plans until we have developed appropriate strategies to improve our comparable restaurant sales. Our objective is to become the favorite Italian restaurant concept in each of our markets.

The majority of our revenues are generated from the sale of food and beverages. In fiscal 2002, we introduced our first Buca di Beppo cookbook, entitled “Into the Sauce, From our Cucina to Your Kitchen.” Cookbook sales were included in our revenues for fiscal 2002 and 2003.

Our Menu

We believe that the authenticity, quality and consistency of our food are the most important components of our long-term success. In contrast to the levity of our decor and ambiance, we take menu development and food preparation very seriously. Each of our Buca di Beppo and Vinny T’s of Boston menus is based on authentic family recipes enjoyed for generations in the villages of Southern Italy and then adapted to American ingredients. We make regular trips to Italy and Sicily to find new recipes for our menus that are then extensively tested and refined before introduction in our restaurants.

Some of Buca di Beppo restaurant’s most popular menu items include Garlic Bread with Mozzarella, Buca di Beppo 1893 Salad, Pizza Arrabiatta, Garlic Mashed Potatoes, Spaghetti with half-pound Meat Balls, Tortelloni, Chicken Marsala, Veal Parmigiana and Tiramisu. We also offer a Baked Specialties menu that includes Baked Ravioli, Cannelloni, Manicotti and Stuffed Shells. These high quality food items are served in small and large family-style portions. In family-style serving, each item is shared by the entire table, which encourages guests to interact and enjoy the meal together.

2

Table of Contents

We also offer Daily Specials centered on a genre of Southern Italian cooking called “cucina di povera,” which translates as “kitchen of the poor.” We believe that our Daily Specials play a vital role in keeping the menu fresh and allow us to test prospective menu items. Our foods, often seasoned with garlic and served with vine-ripened tomatoes, communicate the pure, powerful flavors of the immigrant Southern Italian kitchen.

In an effort to attract smaller parties and allow our guests to try a wider variety of our menu items, we introduced smaller portions sizes for a majority of entrees on our menu. We expect our Buca Small initiative to be implemented in all of our Buca di Beppo restaurants by April 2004.

Vinny T’s of Boston’s menu features a variety of appetizers, soups and salads, pastas, meats, seafood, parmigianas, pizzas, chicken and veal, and desserts. Menu items include Fried Mozzarella, Warm Tomato Salad, Homemade Lasagna, Grilled Pork Chops with Peppers, Linguini with Clam Sauce, Veal Parmigiana, Pepperoni Pizza, Chicken Piccata, and Cannoli. The menu features individual and family style portions.

All of our menu items can be enjoyed either in the restaurant or as take-out. In fiscal 2003, take-out sales represented approximately 7% of our total sales. We believe that take-out represents a continued opportunity to build our sales. However, we expect that as our take-out sales increase, our alcohol sales will likely decrease as a percentage of total sales as off site sales of liquor are generally not allowed at our restaurants.

Our menu pricing is consistent within a market, but may differ slightly market-to-market. The average check per Buca di Beppo guest in fiscal 2003 was approximately $21.00 (including beverages). In fiscal 2003, alcoholic beverages, primarily table wine, accounted for approximately 20% of sales at our Buca di Beppo restaurants.

At Vinny T’s of Boston, our average check was approximately $19.50 (including beverages). In fiscal 2003, alcoholic beverages, accounted for approximately 18% of restaurant sales at our Vinny T’s of Boston restaurants.

Operations

Restaurant Management. Our ability to effectively manage restaurants in a diverse geographic area will continue to be critical to our overall success. We currently have nine Divisional Vice Presidents of Operations overseeing our Buca di Beppo restaurant and one Vice President of Operations for our Vinny T’s of Boston restaurants. Each Divisional Vice President or Vice President of Operations is expected to effectively manage up to 14 restaurants. Our Divisional Vice Presidents or Vice President of Operations supervise each Paisano Partner within his or her territory with the goal of achieving an expected return on investment through the successful implementation and operation of our Buca di Beppo and Vinny T’s of Boston concepts. Our Buca di Beppo Divisional Vice Presidents report directly to a Senior Vice President of Operations. Our Vinny T’s of Boston Vice President of Operations reports to our Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. As we continue to grow and expand geographically, we expect to add additional Divisional Vice Presidents.

The typical Buca di Beppo restaurant management team consists of a Paisano Partner, a Kitchen Manager, an Assistant General Manager and an Assistant Kitchen Manager. The typical Vinny T’s of Boston restaurant consists of a Paisano Partner, a Kitchen Manager, two Assistant Kitchen Managers, and two Assistant General Managers.

A majority of the managers at Buca di Beppo and Vinny T’s of Boston restaurants participate in the Paisano Partner Program. Under the Paisano Partner Program, the restaurant management team receives a percentage of its restaurant’s cash flow before fixed occupancy costs such as rent, common area maintenance and property taxes. The Paisano Partner also receives stock options and is required to purchase $20,000 of Buca, Inc. stock at the time of employment in the position. Kitchen Managers also receive stock options in Buca, Inc. Each member of our restaurant management team is cross-trained in all operational areas.

Hours of Restaurant Operation. The majority of our Buca di Beppo restaurants are open seven days a week, typically opening at 5 p.m. during the week and noon on the weekends and closing at 10 p.m. on weekdays and 11 p.m. on weekends. Currently, 11 of our Buca di Beppo restaurants are open seven days a week starting at 11:30 a.m. Vinny T’s of Boston restaurants are open for lunch and dinner seven days a week from 11:30 a.m. to 10 p.m. on weekdays and 11:30 a.m. to 11 p.m. on weekends.

Recruiting and Training

We actively recruit and select individuals who share our passion for guest service. Testing and multiple interviews are used to aid in the selection of new employees at all levels. We have developed a competitive compensation plan for restaurant management that includes a base salary, competitive benefits package, including a 401(k) plan, and participation in a management incentive plan that rewards the restaurant management team for achieving performance objectives. All of our employees are entitled to

3

Table of Contents

discounted meals at our restaurants. It is our policy to promote from within, but we recognize the need to supplement this policy with outside recruiting at this stage of our growth and as new markets are opened.

We provide all new employees with extensive training to ensure they are provided with the tools to excel in their position. This training encompasses classroom instruction, on-the-job training programs for each position and testing of the new employee’s progress at pre-determined stages within the training schedule. Each new member of the restaurant management team participates in a six-week training program. All management employees receive kitchen training. All Buca di Beppo field management employees typically complete a minimum of one week of training at BUCA University (BUCA U). BUCA U is a training program held at our headquarters in Minneapolis. This program combines hands-on training conducted in the five restaurants in the Minneapolis market with classroom instruction led by management of each of the various corporate office departments. In addition to the formal training programs, we maintain detailed operating procedure manuals, standards, controls, food line management systems and a food culture book to complement the training received at all levels.

Marketing

Our marketing strategy is to communicate the BUCA, Inc., Buca di Beppo and Vinny T’s of Boston brands through both traditional and non-traditional avenues. We focus our efforts on getting people in the local community, particularly civic, business and media leaders, to talk about the Buca di Beppo and Vinny T’s of Boston experience. We expect to invest approximately 3% to 4% of our restaurant sales on marketing efforts in the future. We have run and expect to continue to run radio, print, direct mailers or billboard advertising in a majority of our mature markets. We have retained several new advertising agencies to assist us with our marketing efforts.

In connection with new restaurant openings, we contract with local public relations firms to assist us in establishing and sustaining the Buca di Beppo and Vinny T’s of Boston brands. By organizing events such as pre-opening parties and concierge dinners, these firms focus primarily on introducing Buca di Beppo and Vinny T’s of Boston restaurants to opinion leaders, such as civic and media personalities, and to hospitality industry leaders such as key hotel staff, meeting planners and convention and visitors bureau representatives.

We also sustain restaurant awareness through unpaid media exposure and word-of-mouth advertising, including grassroots neighborhood marketing efforts, primarily driven by the Paisano Partner. Buca di Beppo and Vinny T’s of Boston restaurants have achieved particular success by delivering a sample of menu items to drive-time radio personalities and morning television hosts, earning free media exposure, and often invitations for scheduled return engagements, while developing relationships with high-profile media personalities.

To reinforce our image as a collection of unique neighborhood restaurants, each Paisano Partner works diligently to establish a community presence. Through ongoing neighborhood marketing efforts, supported by our marketing department, each Paisano Partner establishes relationships with area businesses and residents, participates in high-profile events and festivals and takes advantage of opportunities to introduce area residents and workers to the restaurant. Because of their credibility as local business owners and community members, Paisano Partners play an integral role in establishing our restaurants in the neighborhood.

Purchasing

We strive to obtain high quality menu ingredients and other supplies and services for our operations from reliable sources at competitive prices. To this end, we continually research and evaluate various ingredients and products in an effort to maintain the highest quality and to be responsive to changing consumer tastes. Our centralized purchasing staff, under the direction of our Senior Vice President of Food & Beverage and Purchasing, specifies the products to be used at our restaurants and designates the vendors and provides suppliers with detailed ingredient specifications. To maximize purchasing efficiencies and to provide for the freshest ingredients for our menu items, each restaurant’s management team determines the quantity of food and supplies required. To obtain the lowest possible prices for the required high quality and consistent raw ingredients, each restaurant orders items primarily from our national food distributor, SYSCO Corporation, on terms negotiated by our centralized purchasing staff. We believe that all essential food and beverage products are available from several qualified suppliers at competitive prices should an alternative source be required.

New Restaurant Site Selection and Development

Our restaurants will continue to represent the majority of our growth in the near term and our expansion strategy will focus on existing markets in which we operate. We anticipate over the next several years that the majority of our new restaurants will be in existing markets. Opening restaurants in existing markets enables us to increase our operational, marketing and recruiting efficiencies.

4

Table of Contents

Our site selection process is critical to our success and we devote substantial effort to evaluating each potential site. Our real estate advisory committee, which consists of our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Senior Vice Presidents of Operations for the area involved, and two of our non-employee directors, reviews each location. The selection process includes identifying target markets that meet our demographic requirements and targeted minimum return on assets. Our leases are typically 10 years in length with four five-year option periods. We also look to receive tenant allowance from our landlords to offset our development costs. In the past, we have purchased land as we found suitable locations. In the future, we may refinance any purchases of land or buildings through sale-leaseback transactions. We cannot predict whether this financing will be available when needed or on terms acceptable to us.

We are flexible in the types of locations that we can develop a restaurant. We have locations in both urban and suburban locations, including regional shopping malls, in-line shopping centers, retail and entertainment centers, office buildings and freestanding buildings in commercial and residential neighborhoods. Our prototype location is approximately 8,500 to 10,000 square feet. Each new Buca di Beppo or Vinny T’s of Boston leased restaurant is expected to require, on average, a total cash investment of approximately $1.5 million, excluding pre-opening costs expected to be approximately $185,000 for a Buca di Beppo and $200,000 for a Vinny T’s of Boston restaurant. Our prototype designs, which include the cost of the building, are expected to be approximately $2.0 million in total cash investment per restaurant.

Information Technology

We utilize a centralized network to collect information, maintain technical controls and support all our restaurants. A call center located at our home office answers the telephone during the day for 94 Buca di Beppo restaurants. All of our restaurants use personal computer systems integrated with management systems to monitor restaurant sales, product costs and labor costs on a daily basis. Financial controls are maintained through a centralized accounting system, which includes a sophisticated theoretical food cost program and a labor scheduling and tracking program. Physical inventories of food and beverage items are taken on a weekly basis. Daily, weekly and monthly financial information is provided to management for analysis and comparison to our budget and to historical information. We closely monitor restaurant sales, cost of sales, labor and other restaurant trends on a daily, weekly and monthly basis.

Employees

As of December 28, 2003, we had approximately 6,600 employees, of which 133 served in administrative or executive capacities, 473 served as restaurant management personnel and the remainder were hourly restaurant personnel.

None of our employees are covered by collective bargaining agreements and we have never experienced an organized work stoppage or strike. We believe that our working conditions and compensation packages are competitive and consider relations with our employees to be very good.

Intellectual Property

We have registered with the United States Patent and Trademark Office the service marks “BUCA,” “BEPPO,” “BUCA DI BEPPO,” “BUCA DI BEPPO” (stylized), ”BUCA DI BEPPO” & design, “VINNY T’S OF BOSTON” & design, “VINNY T’S OF BOSTON,” “VINNY T’S OF BOSTON BAR RISTORANTE” & design, Mama BUCA I design, Mama BUCA II design, Pouring Chianti Bottle design, Cherubs and Bowl design, Curtain design, Smoking Cherub design and People Toasting With Wine design. In addition, we have trademark registrations for “BUCA” and “BUCA DI BEPPO” in the following countries: Benelux, Denmark, Germany, Iceland, Ireland, Norway, Sweden, and the United Kingdom. We also have pending trademark applications for “BUCA” and “BUCA DI BEPPO” in Canada, the European Union, the Federation Of Russia, and Finland. We believe that our trademarks, service marks, trade dress and other proprietary rights have significant value and are important to the marketing of our restaurant concepts. We have in the past protected our proprietary rights and expect to continue to vigorously protect those rights in the future. We cannot predict, however, whether steps taken by us to protect our proprietary rights will be adequate to prevent misappropriation and/or infringement of these rights or the use by others of restaurant features based upon, or otherwise similar to, our overall concepts. It may be difficult for us to prevent others from copying discrete elements of our concepts and any litigation to enforce our rights will likely be costly. In addition, other local restaurant operations may claim that our name is confusingly similar to their names and may try to prevent us from using our marks in those locales.

Our History

The Buca di Beppo concept was created in Minneapolis in 1993 and originally operated by a company owned by Philip A. Roberts, Don W. Hays and Peter J. Mihajlov. On December 31, 1994, Parasole Restaurant Holdings, Inc., a diversified restaurant company operating in the Minneapolis/St. Paul metropolitan area, acquired this company. Messrs. Roberts and Mihajlov are the principle shareholders of Parasole Restaurant Holdings, Inc. From January 1995 through September 1996, BUCA, Inc. operated as a wholly owned subsidiary of Parasole Restaurant Holdings, Inc. In June 1996, Joseph P. Micatrotto joined BUCA, Inc. as our President and Chief Executive Officer. On September 30, 1996, BUCA, Inc. was spun-off from Parasole Restaurant Holdings,

5

Table of Contents

Inc. through a share dividend of our common stock pro rata among the Parasole Restaurant Holdings, Inc. shareholders to create a better vehicle for obtaining financing for our expansion plans. In January 2002, BUCA, Inc. purchased the assets of the nine Vinny T’s of Boston restaurants, formerly known as Vinny Testa’s Italian-American restaurant. The Vinny T’s of Boston concept was established in Boston in 1993.

Competition

The restaurant industry is intensely competitive. We compete on the basis of taste, quality, price of food offered, guest service, location, ambiance and overall dining experience. We have many well-established competitors, both nationally and locally owned Italian and non-Italian concepts, with substantially greater financial resources and a longer history of operations than we do. Their resources and market presence may provide advantages in marketing, purchasing and negotiating leases. We compete with other restaurant and retail establishments for sites and finding management personnel. Changes in consumer tastes, economic conditions, demographic trends and the location and number of, and type of food served by, competing restaurants could adversely affect our business, as could the unavailability of experienced management and hourly employees.

Government Regulations

Our restaurants are subject to regulation by federal agencies and to licensing and regulation by state and local health, sanitation, building, zoning, safety, fire and other departments relating to the development and operation of restaurants. These regulations include matters relating to environmental, building, construction and zoning requirements and the preparation and sale of food and alcoholic beverages. Our facilities are licensed and subject to regulation under state and local fire, health and safety codes.

Each of our restaurants is required to obtain a license to sell alcoholic beverages on the premises from a state authority and, in certain locations, county and/or municipal authorities. Typically, licenses must be renewed annually and may be revoked or suspended for cause at any time. Alcoholic beverage control regulations relate to numerous aspects of the daily operations of each of our restaurants including: minimum age of patrons and employees; hours of operation; advertising; wholesale purchasing; inventory control and handling; and storage and dispensing of alcoholic beverages. The failure to receive or retain a liquor license in a particular location could adversely affect that restaurant and our ability to obtain such a license elsewhere.

We are subject to “dram-shop” statutes in the states in which our restaurants are located. These statutes generally provide a person injured by an intoxicated person the right to recover damages from an establishment that wrongfully served alcoholic beverages to the intoxicated individual. We carry liquor liability coverage as part of our existing comprehensive general liability insurance, which we believe is consistent with coverage carried by other entities in the restaurant industry. Although we are covered by insurance, a judgement against us under a dram-shop statute in excess of our liability coverage could have a material adverse effect on us.

Our operations are also subject to federal and state laws governing such matters as wages, working conditions, citizenship requirements and overtime. Some states have set minimum wage requirements higher than the federal level. Significant numbers of hourly personnel at our restaurants are paid at rates related to the federal minimum wage and, accordingly, increases in the minimum wage will increase labor costs. We are also subject to the Americans With Disability Act of 1990, which, among other things, may require certain renovations to our restaurants to meet federally mandated requirements. The cost of any such renovations is not expected to materially affect us.

Available Information

Our Internet website is: http://www.bucainc.com. We have made available, free of charge, through our Internet website, our annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, and amendments to those reports, as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file such materials with, or furnish them to, the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Risk Factors

Competition May Adversely Affect Our Operations and Financial Results

The restaurant business is highly competitive with respect to price, service, restaurant location and food quality, and is often affected by changes in consumer tastes, economic conditions, population, and traffic patterns. We compete within each market with locally owned restaurants as well as national and regional restaurant chains, some of which operate more restaurants and have greater financial resources and longer operating histories than we do. There is active competition for management personnel and for attractive commercial real estate sites suitable for restaurants. If we are unable to effectively compete within the

6

Table of Contents

restaurant industry, our operations and financial results could be adversely affected. See “Item 1. Competition” for a discussion of the competition we face.

We May Be Unable to Return to Profitability or Raise Additional Capital

We intend to expend significant financial and management resources on the development of additional restaurants. We cannot predict whether we will be able to achieve revenue growth, generate positive cash flow or return to profitability in the future. Our current credit facility limits our ability to build new restaurants, which has contributed to our decision to slow down our future development plans and develop a revised plan to improve our comparable restaurant sales. Failure to achieve these objectives may cause our stock price to decline and make it difficult to raise additional capital.

We May Be Unable to Reverse the Trend of Negative Comparable Restaurant Sales Results

If we are unable to reverse the decline in negative comparable restaurant sales, we may incur asset impairment charges for restaurants that have operating losses and/or negative cash flows and we may close those restaurants, which may result in significant exit costs, including lease termination costs.

Our Business Could Be Materially Adversely Affected if We Are Unable to Expand in a Timely and Profitable Manner

To continue to grow, we must open new Buca di Beppo and Vinny T’s of Boston restaurants on a timely and profitable basis. We have experienced delays in restaurant openings from time to time and may experience delays in the future. Delays or failures in opening new restaurants could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition, operating results or cash flows. We expanded from 11 restaurants at the end of fiscal 1997 to 105 restaurants at the end of fiscal 2003. We acquired nine Vinny T’s of Boston restaurants in January 2002. We expect to open a total of four restaurants (three Buca di Beppo restaurants and one Vinny T’s of Boston) during fiscal 2004. Our ability to expand successfully will depend on a number of factors, some of which are not entirely within our control, including the:

In addition, we contemplate entering new markets in which we have no operating experience. These new markets may have different demographic characteristics, competitive conditions, consumer tastes and discretionary spending patterns than our existing markets, which may cause our new restaurants to be less successful in these new markets than in our existing markets. Furthermore, a sustained history of significant operating losses at a restaurant could result in a charge for impairment of assets. See Note 1 to our consolidated financial statements for a discussion of the asset impairment criteria and Note 2 to our consolidated financial statements for discussion of the asset impairment charges that we have taken in fiscal 2001, 2002 and 2003.

7

Table of Contents

We May Not Be Able to Achieve and Manage Planned Expansion

We face many business risks associated with growing companies, including the risk that our existing management, information systems and financial controls will be inadequate to support our planned expansion. We cannot predict whether we will be able to respond on a timely basis to all of the changing demands that our planned expansion will impose on management and these systems and controls. If we fail to continue to improve management, information systems and financial controls or encounter unexpected difficulties during expansion, our business, financial condition, operating results or cash flows could be materially adversely affected.

Furthermore, we may seek to acquire other operations. To do so successfully, we would need to identify suitable acquisition candidates, obtain financing on acceptable terms and negotiate acceptable acquisition terms. Even if we are successful in completing acquisitions, they may have a material adverse effect on our operating results, particularly in the fiscal quarters immediately following the completion of an acquisition, while the acquisition is being integrated into our operations.

Fluctuations in Our Operating Results May Result in Decreases in Our Stock Price

Our operating results will fluctuate significantly because of several factors, including increases or decreases in comparable restaurant sales; the timing of new restaurant openings and related expenses; profitability of new restaurants; general economic conditions; seasonality of restaurant sales; consumer confidence in the economy; changes in consumer preferences; impairment of restaurant assets; changes in interest rates; competitive factors and weather conditions. As a result, our operating results may fall below the expectations of public market analysts and investors. In that event, the price of our common stock would likely decrease. See “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” for a discussion of our historical operating results.

Inflation Could Materially Adversely Affect Our Operating Results

The majority of our operating expenses have increased due to inflation. We have tried to offset these increases in operating expenses by increasing menu prices or by implementing other cost-reduction procedures that has limited the overall impact from inflation. Because we are in a competitive industry, we may be limited in the amount of menu prices we can increase. If we are unable to offset increases in operating expenses due to inflation, it could materially adversely affect or business, financial condition, operating results or cash flows.

Increased Energy Costs and Power Outages May Adversely Affect Our Profitability

Our success depends in part on our ability to absorb increases in utility costs. Various regions of the United States in which we operate multiple restaurants, particularly California, have experienced significant and temporary increases in utility prices. We have in the past closed restaurants on a temporary basis due to the inability to receive electrical power. If these increases should recur, it may adversely affect our profitability.

Increased Food Costs Could Materially Adversely Affect Our Operating Results

Our profitability also depends in part on our ability to anticipate and react to changes in food costs. We rely on SYSCO Corporation, a national food distributor, as the primary distributor of our food. Although we believe that alternative distribution sources are available, any increase in distribution prices or failure to perform by SYSCO could cause our food costs to increase. Further, various factors beyond our control, including adverse weather conditions and governmental regulation, may affect our food costs. We cannot predict whether we will be able to anticipate and react to changing food costs by adjusting our purchasing practices and menu prices, and a failure to do so could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition, operating results or cash flows.

Changes in Consumer Preferences or Discretionary Consumer Spending Could Negatively Impact Our Results

Our restaurants feature Italian cuisine served primarily in small and large family-style portions. Our continued success depends, in part, upon the popularity of this type of Italian cuisine and this style of informal dining. Shifts in consumer preferences away from our cuisine or dining style could materially adversely affect our future profitability. Also, our success depends to a significant extent on numerous factors affecting discretionary consumer spending, including economic conditions, disposable consumer income and consumer confidence. Adverse changes in these factors could reduce guest traffic or impose practical limits on pricing, either of which could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition, operating results or cash flows.

We Could Face Potential Labor Shortages

Our success depends in part upon our ability to attract, motivate and retain a sufficient number of qualified employees, including restaurant managers, kitchen staff and wait staff, necessary to keep pace with our expansion schedule. Qualified individuals

8

Table of Contents

needed to fill these positions are in short supply in certain areas, and the inability to recruit and retain such individuals may delay the planned openings of new restaurants or result in high employee turnover in existing restaurants, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, operating results or cash flows. Additionally, competition for qualified employees could require us to pay higher wages to attract sufficient employees, which could result in higher labor costs.

Our Operations Depend on Governmental Licenses and Complying with Government Regulations

Each of our restaurants is subject to licensing and regulation by alcoholic beverage control, health, sanitation, safety and fire agencies in the state, county and/or municipality in which the restaurant is located. There can be no assurance that we will not experience difficulties or failures in obtaining the required licenses or approvals. If we fail to hold all necessary licenses, we may be forced to delay or cancel new restaurant openings and close or reduce operations at existing locations.

We also are subject to federal and state environmental regulations and adverse changes in these regulations could have a material negative effect on our operations. For example, more stringent and varied requirements of local and state governmental bodies with respect to zoning, land use and environmental factors could delay or prevent development of new restaurants in particular locations.

We are subject to the Fair Labor Standards Act, which governs such matters as minimum wages, overtime and other working conditions, along with the Americans With Disabilities Act, various family leave mandates and a variety of other laws enacted, or rules and regulations promulgated, by federal, state and local governmental authorities that govern these and other employment matters. A material increase in the minimum wage and other statutory benefits could adversely affect our operating results and profitability.

We May Face Liability Under Dram Shop Statutes

Our sale of alcoholic beverages subjects us to “dram shop” statutes in most states. These statutes allow an injured person to recover damages from an establishment that served alcoholic beverages to an intoxicated person. If we receive a judgment substantially in excess of our insurance coverage, or if we fail to maintain our insurance coverage, our business, financial condition, operating results or cash flows could be materially and adversely affected. See “Item 1. Business—Government Regulation” for a discussion of the regulations we must comply with.

Complaints or Litigation and the Related Adverse Publicity From Guests May Materially Adversely Affect Us

We are from time to time the subject of complaints or litigation from guests alleging illness, injury or other food quality, health or operational concerns. These claims may divert our financial and management resources that would otherwise be used to benefit the future performance of our operations.

Multi-unit restaurant businesses can also be adversely affected by publicity resulting from poor food quality, food-born illness or other health concerns or operating issues stemming from one or a limited number of restaurants. In particular, since we depend heavily on the brands Buca di Beppo and Vinny T’s of Boston for all of our revenues, unfavorable publicity relating to one or more Buca di Beppo or Vinny T’s of Boston restaurants could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, and financial condition.

We May be Unable to Fund Our Significant Future Capital Needs and We May Need Additional Funding Sooner Than Anticipated

We may need substantial capital to finance our expansion plans, which require funds for capital expenditures, pre-opening costs and potential initial operating losses related to new restaurant openings. We may not be able to obtain additional financing on acceptable terms. If adequate funds are not available, we will have to curtail projected growth, which could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition, operating results or cash flows. Moreover, if we issue additional equity securities, the holdings of existing shareholders may be diluted.

Although we expect that borrowings under our credit facility, combined with other resources will be sufficient to fund our capital requirements at least through fiscal 2005, this may not be the case. Our credit facility limits our capital expenditures in future years, including a maximum of $13 million in fiscal 2004. We may be required to seek additional capital earlier than anticipated if:

9

Table of Contents

See “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Liquidity and Capital Resources” for a discussion of our historical and anticipated capital needs.

We May Suffer from Uninsured Losses that Could Have a Material Adverse Effect on Our Business

We have comprehensive insurance, including general liability, fire, extended coverage and employee practices liability coverage. However, there are certain types of losses that may be uninsurable or that we believe are not economically insurable, such as earthquakes, other natural disasters, and terrorist attacks. In view of the location of many of our existing and planned restaurants in California and other earthquake prone areas of the United States, our operations are susceptible to damage and disruption caused by earthquakes. In the event of an earthquake or other natural disaster affecting one or more geographic areas of our operations, we could suffer a loss of the capital invested in, as well as anticipated earnings from, the damaged or destroyed properties.

The terrorist attacks on the United States had a significant impact on the portion of our business that is celebratory in nature and adversely affected our restaurant sales and profitability. With the threats of additional terrorists attacks and continuing uncertainty created by the war on terrorism, there could be a potential downturn in the economy and a decrease in consumer spending. These factors, as well as the effects of adverse publicity to our business could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

We lease the land and building at 51 of our Buca di Beppo restaurant locations and all 10 of our Vinny T’s of Boston restaurant locations. Of our remaining restaurant locations, we lease the land and own the building at 34 restaurant locations and own the land and building at 10 locations. Current restaurant leases have expiration dates ranging from 2004 to 2023, excluding options to renew for additional periods of time.

We currently own and operate 95 Buca di Beppo restaurants and 10 Vinny T’s of Boston restaurants located in 43 markets in 30 states and the District of Columbia.

10

Table of Contents

We maintain our executive offices at 1300 Nicollet Mall, Suite 5003, Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55403. Subject to normal expansion, we believe that our facilities are adequate to meet our present needs and reasonably foreseeable needs.

From time to time, we are a defendant in litigation arising in the ordinary course of our business, including claims resulting from “slip and fall” accidents, claims under federal and state laws governing access to public accommodations, employment-related claims and claims from guests alleging illness, injury or other food quality, health or operational concerns. To date, none of this litigation, some of which is covered by insurance, has had a material effect on us. We are aware of a complaint filed by two of our former employees in California in March 2004 alleging that we have violated certain wage and labor codes. We believe that these allegations are without merit and intend to defend the company rigorously.

None.

Our executive officers are as follows:

None of the above executive officers is related to each other or to any of our other directors.

11

Table of Contents

Joseph P. Micatrotto joined BUCA, Inc. in 1996 as President, Chief Executive Officer and as a director. In July 1999, he became the Chairman of the Board. Mr. Micatrotto’s 30-year career in restaurant management includes tenure as CEO of Panda Management Company, Inc., where he led the company’s expansion, and as President and CEO of Chi-Chi’s Mexican Restaurante, Inc., where he was instrumental in its national growth. Mr. Micatrotto is active on various boards and industry groups including the National Restaurant Association.

Greg A. Gadel has been our Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer since 1997, our Secretary since 1998 and our Executive Vice President since 2001. Prior to joining BUCA, Inc., Mr. Gadel was CFO for the 32-unit restaurant chain, Leeann Chin. He also previously served as Vice President and Controller for the largest Chi-Chi’s Mexican Restaurante, Inc. franchisee, Consul Corporation. He has also worked for Marriott International, Inc., McDonald’s Corporation and the Deloitte & Touche LLP accounting firm. He has more than 21 years of experience in the restaurant industry. Mr. Gadel is a member of the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants.

Stephen B. Hickey joined BUCA, Inc. in January 2004 as our Chief Marketing Officer. Mr. Hickey brings over 35 years of marketing and consulting experience to BUCA, Inc. Mr. Hickey has held senior marketing executive positions with several major quick-service and full-service restaurant chains. He launched his career at McDonald’s, where he served in several capacities including Staff Director of National Marketing. He also held Vice President of Marketing positions with Hardee’s Food Systems, Applebee’s, and Wendy’s International, Inc. Prior to joining BUCA, Inc., Mr. Hickey served as Senior Vice President of Marketing for Creative Consumer Concepts, a kids and family marketing company serving the restaurant industry.

John J. Motschenbacher joined BUCA, Inc. as our Corporate Controller in 1998. He was promoted to Vice President of Finance and Purchasing in 1999, Senior Vice President of Information Technology in August 2003, and Chief Information Officer in March 2004. Mr. Motschenbacher oversees the information technology and guest services departments. His primary responsibilities are to manage the communication structure for the restaurants and corporate office. Previously, Mr. Motschenbacher was the Controller for Café Odyssey restaurant, Leann Chin Inc. and Bon Appetit Management Company. Mr. Motschenbacher has 16 years of experience in the restaurant industry.

Joseph J. Kohaut joined BUCA, Inc. in 1997 as a Divisional Vice President. Mr. Kohaut became Senior Vice President of Operations in 2001, Chief Operations Officer in 2002, and Senior Vice President of Food & Beverage and Purchasing in 2004. Mr. Kohaut has more than 25 years of restaurant industry experience, including management positions with Panda Management Company, Inc., Chi-Chi’s Mexican Restaurante, Inc. and the Ground Round, Inc. He is a member of the board of directors of the American Beverage Institute and Cheers Editorial Advisory Board.

PART II

Our common stock trades on the Nasdaq National Market System under the symbol “BUCA.” As of March 2, 2004, there were approximately 599 record holders of our common stock. The following table sets forth for the quarters indicated the high and low sales prices of our common stock, as reported by the Nasdaq Stock Market.

We have never declared or paid cash dividends on our common stock. We currently intend to retain all future earnings for the operation and expansion of our business and do not anticipate paying cash dividends on our common stock in the foreseeable future. Any payment of cash dividends in the future will be at the discretion of our board of directors and will depend upon our results of operations, earnings, capital requirements, contractual restrictions and other factors deemed relevant by our board. In addition, our current credit facility prohibits us from paying any cash dividends for as long as any loan, unpaid reimbursement obligation or letter of credit is outstanding under the credit facility or any of our lenders has any obligation to make any loans or to issue, extend or renew any letter of credit under the credit facility.

12

Table of Contents

On February 26, 2004, we completed the sale in a private placement of 3,300,000 shares of newly issued common stock to institutional investors. The purchase price was $5.50 per share and resulted in gross proceeds of $18,150,000. The sales were made in reliance upon exemptions from registration provided under Section 4(2) and Regulation D of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, for transactions not involving a public offering. We intend to file a registration statement on Form S-3 in connection with the resale of such shares.

SELECTED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA

(in thousands, except share, per share and operating data)

The following selected consolidated statements of operations and balance sheet data for the five fiscal years ended December 28, 2003 are derived from our audited consolidated financial statements. The consolidated financial statements and their notes for each of the three fiscal years ended December 28, 2003, and the independent auditors’ report on those years, are included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. This selected consolidated financial data should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and their notes, “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and other financial information included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

13

Table of Contents

Overview

At December 28, 2003, we owned and operated 95 Buca di Beppo and 10 Vinny T’s of Boston restaurants. Our Buca di Beppo restaurants are full service, primarily dinner only restaurants that offer high quality, immigrant Southern Italian cuisine served family-style in small and large family-sized portions in a fun and energetic atmosphere that parodies the decor and ambiance of post-War Italian/American restaurants. Our Vinny T’s of Boston restaurants serve individual and family-style portions for both lunch and dinner. The Vinny T’s of Boston restaurants are based upon recreations of the neighborhood Italian eateries prominent and the neighborhoods of lower Manhattan, Brooklyn and South Philadelphia in the 1940’s.

From 1996 to 2003, we had pursued a rapid but disciplined expansion strategy, opening two restaurants in 1996; five in 1997; eight in 1998; 15 in 1999; 17 in each of 2000 and 2001; and 14 in each of 2002 and 2003. In January 2002, we purchased the assets of nine Vinny T’s of Boston restaurants. In fiscal 2004, we have decided to slow down our development plans until we have developed appropriate strategies to improve our comparable restaurant sales trends. We intend to open three new Buca di Beppo restaurants and one new Vinny T’s of Boston restaurant in fiscal 2004. All have leases signed and two are under construction.

In an effort to attract smaller parties and allow our guests to try a wider variety of our menu items, we introduced smaller portion sizes for a majority of entrees on our menu. We expect our Buca Small initiative to be implemented in all of our Buca di Beppo restaurants by April 2004. We also expect to begin to publicize our Buca Small menu during the first half of fiscal 2004.

14

Table of Contents

The Buca Small menu initiative is a continuing step in our efforts to evolve our menu in order to attract a wider variety of guests into our restaurants. We are also in the process of implementing our lunch program in approximately 25% of our Buca di Beppo restaurants over the next 12 months. We believe that the Buca Small menu, lunch menu program, increased marketing campaign efforts and focused management efforts will assist in our ability to achieve our ultimate long-term goal of increasing our comparable restaurant sales through guest counts.

Our restaurant sales are primarily comprised of the sales of food and beverages. Our calculation of comparable restaurant sales includes restaurants open for 18 full calendar months. Product costs include the costs of food and beverages. Labor costs include direct hourly and management wages, bonuses, taxes and benefits for restaurant employees. Direct and occupancy costs include restaurant supplies, marketing costs, rent, utilities, real estate taxes, repairs and maintenance and other related costs. Depreciation and amortization principally include depreciation on capital expenditures for restaurants. General and administrative expenses are comprised of expenses associated with all corporate and administrative functions that support existing operations, management and staff salaries, employee benefits, travel, information systems and training and market research. Pre-opening costs consist of direct costs related to hiring and training the initial restaurant workforce and certain other direct costs associated with opening new restaurants. Loss on impairment of long-lived assets primarily relates to fixed and other long-term asset impairment charges on both open and unopened restaurants. Interest expense includes the cost of interest expense on debt and interest income includes the interest income on invested assets. The early extinguishment of debt is related to the write-off of deferred loan acquisition costs at the time at which we refinanced our credit facility. The provision for (benefit from) income taxes represents our estimate of all federal and state income taxes we will have to pay for that period.

Results of Operations

Our operating results for the 52-week periods ended December 30, 2001, December 29, 2002 and December 28, 2003 expressed as a percentage of sales were as follows:

15

Table of Contents

52 Week Fiscal Year Ended December 28, 2003 Compared to 52 Week Fiscal Year Ended December 29, 2002

Restaurant sales. Restaurant sales increased by $16.7 million, or 7.0%, to $257.0 million in fiscal 2003 from $240.3 million in fiscal 2002. The increase in restaurant sales was a result of 13 new Buca di Beppo restaurants and one Vinny T’s of Boston restaurant opened in fiscal 2003 and a full year of sales on 14 new Buca di Beppo restaurants opened in fiscal 2002. Our Buca di Beppo comparable restaurants sales decreased by 6.9% in fiscal 2003. Our Vinny T’s of Boston comparable restaurant sales decreased 7.8% in fiscal 2003. Our Buca di Beppo average weekly sales declined to $48,344 in fiscal 2003 from $52,186 in fiscal 2002. Our Vinny T’s of Boston average weekly sales declined to $60,429 in fiscal 2003 from $65,214 in fiscal 2002. Both of these reductions in comparable restaurant sales and average weekly sales were due to a reduction in guest counts. We increased prices approximately 1.5% at Buca di Beppo on the first day of fiscal 2003 and approximately 2.5% at Vinny T’s of Boston in March 2003. We expect to increase prices approximately 1% at Buca di Beppo with the introduction of our Buca Small menu program by April 2004. We have not taken a price increase at Vinny T’s of Boston in fiscal 2004.

Product. Product costs increased by $3.8 million to $62.6 million in fiscal 2003 from $58.8 million in fiscal 2002. Product costs decreased as a percentage of restaurant sales to 24.4% in fiscal 2003 from 24.5% in fiscal 2002. This reduction as a percentage of sales was primarily the result of stronger purchasing contracts for a number of key products, change in accounting for contributions from our product vendors for our paisano management conference, and a 1.5% price increase implemented at Buca di Beppo and a 2.5% price increase implemented at our Vinny T’s of Boston restaurants in fiscal 2003. We expect product costs to remain constant as a percentage of sales in fiscal 2004 from fiscal 2003.

Labor. Labor costs increased by $8.9 million to $86.6 million in fiscal 2003 from $77.7 million in fiscal 2002. Labor costs increased as a percentage of sales to 33.7% in fiscal 2003 as compared to 32.3% in fiscal 2002. The primary reason for the increase in labor costs as a percentage of sales in fiscal 2003 was the decline in average weekly sales at both Buca di Beppo and Vinny T’s of Boston. Our hourly labor increased 0.8%, management payroll increased 0.2%, and payroll taxes and benefits increased 0.4%, as a percentage of sales in fiscal 2003 as compared to fiscal 2002. We expect labor costs to remain constant as a percentage of sales in fiscal 2004 as compared to fiscal 2003

Direct and occupancy. Direct and occupancy costs increased by $12.3 million to $69.5 million in fiscal 2003 from $57.2 million in fiscal 2002. Direct and occupancy costs increased as a percentage of sales to 27.1% in fiscal 2003 from 23.8% in fiscal 2002. The increase in direct and occupancy costs, which are primarily fixed in nature, as a percentage of sales was directly related to the decline in average weekly sales and rising insurance, property tax and utility costs. We anticipate direct and occupancy costs to increase slightly as a percentage of sales in fiscal 2004 as compared with fiscal 2003. The expected increase in direct and occupancy costs as a percentage of sales is due to expected increases in our marketing expenses from 2.7% of sales in fiscal 2003 to approximately 3.5% in fiscal 2004.

Depreciation and Amortization. Depreciation and amortization expenses increased by $3.1 million to $16.5 million in fiscal 2003 from $13.4 million in fiscal 2002. This increase was primarily the result of depreciation recognized on capital expenditures for new restaurants. The $13.6 million loss on impairment of long-lived assets taken in fiscal 2003 for our restaurants currently in operation will decrease the amount of depreciation and amortization expense that we will need to incur for those restaurants in future years. We expect depreciation and amortization expenses to increase slightly in fiscal 2004 from fiscal 2003.

General and Administrative. General and administrative expenses increased by $2.2 million to $18.4 million in fiscal 2003 from $16.2 million in fiscal 2002. General and administrative expenses increased as a percentage of sales to 7.2% in fiscal 2003 from 6.7% in fiscal 2002. The increase in general and administrative costs as a percentage of sales was due to the decline in average weekly sales and a $1.1 million increase related to a change in our method of accounting for vendor contributions related to our annual paisano management conference. In years previous to fiscal 2003, we had recorded vendor contributions to our paisano management conference as a reduction in general and administrative costs. In fiscal 2003, we began to record these contributions as a reduction in the related product or direct and occupancy cost. The change was made in accordance with Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) No. 02-16, Accounting by a Customer for Certain Consideration Received from a Vendor. See Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements for a discussion of the method of accounting for vendor contributions. We expect general and administrative expenses to decrease as a percentage of sales from fiscal 2003 to fiscal 2004 primarily because of reductions related to our slow down in new restaurant development.

Pre-opening Costs. Pre-opening costs decreased $0.3 million to $2.3 million in fiscal 2003 from $2.6 million in fiscal 2002. Pre-opening costs decreased as a percentage of sales to 0.9% in fiscal 2003 from 1.1% in fiscal 2002. The decrease in pre-opening costs as a percentage of sales was due to management’s efforts to reduce these costs to our model of $185,000 per new restaurant opening and due to increased sales on a larger base of restaurants. We expect that pre-opening costs will decrease significantly as a percentage of sales as we expect to open 4 new restaurants in fiscal 2004 compared to 14 new restaurants opened in fiscal 2003.

Loss on impairment of long-lived assets. Loss on impairment of long-lived assets increased $14.9 million to $15.3 million in fiscal 2003 as compared to $0.4 million in fiscal 2002. The loss on impairment of long-lived assets in fiscal 2003 primarily related to a $13.6 million write down of nine Buca di Beppo restaurants currently in operation as well as a $1.5 million

16

Table of Contents

impairment taken on capitalized development costs for restaurants which we do not expect to open. The impairment of long-lived assets at restaurants in operation was required because management determined that the value of future undiscounted cash flows did not support the carrying value of assets. The impairment of assets for unopened restaurants was due to a reduction in our development plans. See Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements for further information regarding our losses on impairment of long-lived assets. The loss on impairment of long-lived assets in fiscal 2002 related to capitalized development costs for restaurants which we do not expect to open.

Interest income. Interest income decreased by $93,000 to $95,000 in fiscal 2003 from $188,000 in fiscal 2002. Interest income is related to the interest payments on loans we receive from our Paisano Partners in accordance with our Paisano Partner program. We expect that interest income in fiscal 2003 will increase slightly from fiscal 2002.

Interest expense. Interest expense increased $1.0 million to $2.2 million in fiscal 2003 from $1.2 million in fiscal 2002. The increase in interest expense related to increased borrowings and a higher interest rate on our term loan and line of credit facilities. We completed a private sale of shares of our common stock in February 2004 and used the net proceeds of approximately $17 million to pay down borrowings outstanding under our credit facility and for general corporate purposes. We expect interest expense to decrease in fiscal 2004 from fiscal 2003 due to decreased borrowings on our amended credit facility.

Early extinguishment of debt. There was no early extinguishment of debt charge in fiscal 2003. Early extinguishment of debt charges of $394,000 taken in fiscal 2002 related to deferred loan acquisition costs on our credit facility that was replaced in October 2002. We expect to take approximately $500,000 in early extinguishment of debt charges in the first quarter of fiscal 2004 due to the partial repayment of debt under our amended credit facility. See “Liquidity and Capital Resources” below for further information regarding the private placement of our common stock in February 2004 and amendments to our current credit facility.

(Provision for) benefit from income taxes. We recorded a $4.0 million benefit from income taxes in fiscal 2003. We incurred a provision for income taxes of $4.6 million in fiscal 2002. Because of the decline in our profitability in fiscal 2003, we recorded a $2.7 million tax valuation allowance against our long-term deferred tax assets in fiscal 2003. The benefit from income taxes in fiscal 2003 and provision for income taxes in fiscal 2002 both represented our best estimate of our ultimate income tax effects related to each fiscal year. We will continue to record a tax valuation allowance until it becomes more likely than not that we will be able to recover the value of our deferred tax assets.

52 Week Fiscal Year Ended December 29, 2002 Compared to 52 Week Fiscal Year Ended December 30, 2001

Restaurant sales. Restaurant sales increased by $64.7 million, or 36.8%, to $240.3 million in fiscal 2002 from $175.6 million in fiscal 2001. The increase in restaurant sales was a result of sales from new Buca di Beppo restaurants and the addition of nine Vinny T’s of Boston restaurants on January 14, 2002. Our Buca di Beppo comparable restaurants sales decreased by 2.1% in fiscal 2002. Our Vinny T’s of Boston comparable restaurant sales decreased 7.6% for the period from January 14, 2002 to the end of fiscal 2002. Both of these reductions in comparable restaurant sales were due to a reduction in guest counts.

Product. Product costs increased by $14.6 million to $58.8 million in fiscal 2002 from $44.2 million in fiscal 2001. Product costs decreased as a percentage of restaurant sales to 24.5% in fiscal 2002 from 25.2% in fiscal 2001. This reduction as a percentage of sales was primarily a result of stronger purchasing contracts for a number of key products, the increased sale of Baked Specialties and specials that have higher product margins and the price increase implemented at our Buca di Beppo restaurants in March 2002.

Labor. Labor costs increased by $22.1 million to $77.7 million in fiscal 2002 from $55.6 million in fiscal 2001. Labor costs increased as a percentage of sales to 32.3% in fiscal 2002 as compared to 31.7% in fiscal 2001. A 0.6% improvement in hourly labor as a percentage of sales was offset by the increase as a percentage of sales of primarily fixed management payroll and benefits costs. The increase in management payroll and benefit costs as a percentage of sales was due to the decline in average weekly sales and the addition of Vinny T’s of Boston. Vinny T’s of Boston’s labor costs as a percentage of sales are higher than those of Buca di Beppo because the Vinny T’s of Boston restaurants serve lunch, which has a lower margin than dinner.

Direct and occupancy. Direct and occupancy costs increased by $17.3 million to $57.2 million in fiscal 2002 from $39.9 million in fiscal 2001. Direct and occupancy costs increased as a percentage of sales to 23.8% in fiscal 2002 from 22.7% in fiscal 2001.

The increase in direct and occupancy costs, which are primarily fixed in nature, as a percentage of sales was directly related to the decline in average weekly sales and a 0.6% increase in marketing spending.

Depreciation and amortization. Depreciation and amortization expenses increased by $3.8 million to $13.4 million in fiscal 2002 from $9.6 million in fiscal 2001. This increase was primarily the result of depreciation recognized on capital expenditures for new restaurants.

17

Table of Contents

General and administrative. General and administrative expenses increased by $5.7 million to $16.2 million in fiscal 2002 from $10.5 million in fiscal 2001. General and administrative expenses increased as a percentage of sales to 6.7% in fiscal 2002 from 6.0% in fiscal 2001. The increase in general and administrative costs as a percentage of sales was due to the decline in average weekly sales and $840,000 in expenses related to the development of our Buca di Beppo cookbook.

Pre-opening costs. Pre-opening costs decreased by $865,000 to $2.6 million in fiscal 2002 from $3.5 million in fiscal 2001. Pre-opening costs decreased as a percentage of sales to 1.1% in fiscal 2002 from 2.0% in fiscal 2001. The decrease in pre-opening costs as a percentage of sales was due to management’s efforts to reduce these costs to our model of $185,000 per new restaurant opening and to increased sales on a larger base of restaurants.

Loss on impairment of long-lived assets. The loss on impairment of long-lived assets declined $1.8 million to $382,000 in fiscal 2002 as compared to $2.1 million in fiscal 2001. The loss on impairment of long-lived assets in fiscal 2002 related to the write off of capitalized development costs on restaurants which we do not expect to open because of a reduction in our development plans. The loss on impairment of long-lived assets in fiscal 2001 related primarily to a $1.8 million asset impairment charge taken at our lowest sales volume restaurant because the estimated future undiscounted cash flows did not support the value of fixed assets at that location.

Interest income. Interest income decreased by $457,000 to $188,000 in fiscal 2002 from $645,000 in fiscal 2001. The decrease in interest income is related to a lower amount of invested assets during the year and lower interest rates.

Interest expense. Interest expense increased $956,000 to $1,226,000 in fiscal 2002 from $270,000 in fiscal 2001. The increase in interest expense related to increased borrowings on our term loan and line of credit facilities.

Early extinguishment of debt. Early extinguishment of debt charges of $394,000 taken in fiscal 2002 related to deferred loan acquisition costs on our credit facility that was replaced in October 2002.

Provision for Income Taxes. The provision for income taxes of $4.6 million in fiscal 2002, which is 36.3% of pre-tax income, represents our estimated tax liability for the year. Our tax rate increased slightly from fiscal 2001 primarily due to increased state income taxes and the reduced impact of the income tax credit we receive for social security paid on reported tips.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Net cash provided by operating activities was $14.7 million in fiscal 2003, $27.8 million in fiscal 2002, and $22.6 million in fiscal 2001. Net cash provided by operating activities in fiscal 2003, 2002, and 2001 primarily related to net (loss) income plus the value of non-cash charges related to depreciation and amortization and the loss on impairment of long-lived assets. We expect to continue to generate cash from operating activities in future periods.

We use cash primarily to fund the development and construction of new restaurants. Net capital expenditures were $28.8 million in fiscal 2003, $44.5 million in fiscal 2002 and $49.6 million in fiscal 2001. We opened 13 Buca di Beppo restaurants and one Vinny T’s of Boston restaurant in fiscal 2003 as compared to 14 new Buca di Beppo restaurants in fiscal 2002 and 17 new Buca di Beppo restaurants in fiscal 2001. In January 2002, we purchased nine Vinny T’s of Boston restaurants for approximately $21 million. Each new Buca di Beppo or Vinny T’s of Boston leased restaurant is expected to require, on average, a total cash investment of between $1.0 million and $1.5 million, excluding pre-opening costs expected to be approximately $185,000 for a Buca di Beppo and $200,000 for a Vinny T’s of Boston restaurant. Since 1999, we have been building restaurants based upon our prototype designs. These designs are expected to require between $1.5 million to $2.0 million in total cash investment per restaurant. This investment represents an incremental $500,000 increase over the historical cash investment for remodeled restaurants.

In fiscal 2003, we received $3.6 million from the sale of property and equipment. The majority of these funds were related to the $3.3 million sale and leaseback of our St. Paul restaurant in June 2003. The net book value at the time of the sale was $1.2 million, thus creating a $2.1 million deferred gain on the sale and leaseback of the restaurant. This deferred gain will be recognized over the remainder of the 20-year initial operating lease term. We have and may continue to refinance any purchases of land or buildings through sale-leaseback transactions. Our current credit facility restricts our ability to complete certain types of sale-leaseback transactions. We cannot predict whether this financing will be available when needed or on terms acceptable to us.

On January 28, 2004, our board of directors and management reached a decision to cancel the development of a number of restaurant sites. At two of these sites, we had already executed operating lease agreements and have been making monthly lease payments of approximately $37,000. These leases were established during fiscal 2002 and 2003 and have initial non-cancelable terms of 10 to 20 years. During fiscal 2004, we expect to incur certain charges to exit such leases. The fair value of these charges will be estimated in accordance with the accounting standards as documented in Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 146 “Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Dispersal Activities.” This will require that we negotiate a settlement with the landlord or estimate the present value of the future minimum lease obligations offset by the estimated sublease rentals that could be reasonably obtained for the properties.

Net cash provided by financing activities was $9.7 million in fiscal 2003, $29.2 million in fiscal 2002 and $31.7 million in fiscal 2001. Financing activities in fiscal 2003 consisted primarily of borrowings on our line of credit and payments of our term loan. The net proceeds from our debt borrowings were primarily used to fund the development of 13 new Buca di Beppo and one new Vinny T’s of Boston restaurant. Financing activities in fiscal 2002 consisted of borrowings and payments on credit facilities completed in January and October of that year. The proceeds from those two credit facilities were primarily used to purchase

18

Table of Contents

Vinny T’s of Boston in January 2002 and fund the development of 14 new Buca di Beppo restaurants. Financing activities in fiscal 2001 consisted primarily of the sales of equity securities in a private investment in a public entity (PIPE), primarily to help fund the development of 17 new Buca di Beppo restaurants.

In October 2002, we closed on a credit facility comprised of a $25 million term loan and a $25 million line of credit facility with the option to borrow an additional $10 million under the line of credit provided we are not in default under the terms of the loan agreement at the time. The revolving credit facility expires on October 11, 2007. We were required to pay back $5 million annually in principal toward the term loan during fiscal 2003 through 2007. Principal payments are to be made on a quarterly basis. The revolving credit facility bore interest at the lower of our lenders’ reference rate plus 0.75% to 1.50% or Eurodollar rate plus 2.25% to 3.00%, dependent upon our meeting certain financial ratios. We are required to pay 0.50% on all unused line of credit funds. The credit agreement contains covenants that place restrictions on sales of properties, transactions with affiliates, creation of additional debt, limitations on capital expenditures and other customary covenants. Borrowings under the credit agreement are collateralized by substantially all of our assets.

In November 2003, we amended our credit agreement. Under this amendment, which waived certain financial covenant defaults, we paid a fee of approximately $100,000. The agreement also increased the interest rate to the lower of our lenders reference rate plus 0.75% to 2.25% or Eurodollar rate plus 2.25% to 3.75% (3.34% to 4.84% as of March 3, 2004). The amended credit agreement contains covenants that place restriction on sales of properties, transactions with affiliates, creation of additional debt, limitations on capital expenditures, maintenance of certain financial ratios, eliminates future sale-leaseback transactions and includes other customary covenants.

In February 2004, we further amended our credit facility. The amendment, which waived certain financial covenant defaults, required us to pay $8.5 million as a permanent reduction in our term loan facility and changed the maturity date of the term loan facility from October 11, 2007 to October 11, 2006. Of the $8.5 million in payments against the term loan, $5.0 million was applied to the required term loan payments in fiscal 2007. The remaining $3.5 million was applied evenly against the required term loan payments for fiscal years 2004 through 2006. Thus, our revised term loan requirement is to pay $3,833,333 annually for fiscal years 2004 through 2006. These payments are required to be made evenly over the four quarters of each fiscal year. The amendment changed certain financial covenants and eliminated our minimum interest coverage ratio requirement. Our annual capital expenditures are limited as follows: $13 million in fiscal 2004; $17 million in fiscal 2005; $19 million in fiscal 2006 and $21 million in fiscal 2007. Also, the amendment limits our ability to incur capital expenditures for new restaurants and sign leases for new restaurant locations. We were required to pay a waiver fee of $112,500. At March 3, 2004, we had $11.5 million outstanding on our term loan and $12.5 million outstanding on our line of credit.

On February 26, 2004, we completed the sale of 3.3 million shares of Buca, Inc. stock at a price of $5.50 per share for total gross proceeds of $18,150,000. After deducting equity transaction costs of approximately $1 million, we received net proceeds from the equity sale of approximately $17 million, $8.5 million of which was used to prepay our term loan facility and $7.5 million of which was used to pay down our line of credit borrowings.

Our capital requirements, including development costs related to the opening of additional restaurants, have been and will continue to be significant. We expect our capital requirements in fiscal 2004 to be approximately $13 million, which is the limit established under our credit facility. We have slowed down our development for fiscal 2004 until we have developed appropriate strategies to improve our comparable restaurant sales trends. We may need substantial capital to finance our expansion plans, which require funds for capital expenditures, pre-opening costs and initial operating losses related to new restaurant openings. The adequacy of available funds and our future capital requirements will depend on many factors, including the pace of expansion, the costs and capital expenditures for new restaurant development and the nature of contributions, loans and other arrangements negotiated with landlords. Although we can make no assurance, we believe that our available cash, cash flows from operations, and our available borrowings will be sufficient to fund our capital requirements through at least 2005. To fund future operations, we may need to raise additional capital through public or private equity or debt financing to continue our growth. In addition, we have and may continue to consider acquiring the operations of other companies. The sale of additional equity or debt securities could result in additional dilution to our shareholders. We cannot predict whether additional capital will be available on favorable terms, if at all.

Our capital expenditures in fiscal 2003 included development of a training facility in Sermenino, Italy. As of December 28, 2003, $279,000 had been invested in the land and other site development costs. We estimate the additional cost to complete construction of the facility to be approximately $700,000.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements.

19

Table of Contents

Contractual Obligations

The following table provides aggregate information about our contractual payment obligations and the periods in which payments are due (in thousands):

Purchase Obligations

We have entered into an agreement with Heinz North America for the purchase of tomato products. In exchange for a fixed price commitment, we are obligated to utilize Heinz North America for a minimum of 85% of our annual tomato products business. This contract expires on July 31, 2005.

We have entered into an agreement with ConAgra Foods for the purchase of tomato products in exchange for a fixed price commitment. We have no minimum purchase requirements. This contract expires on September 30, 2005.

We have entered into an agreement with Pepsi-Cola to be our exclusive provider of fountain beverages. This agreement expires upon the latter of October 5, 2009 or until such time as we have purchased a total of 2,400,000 gallons of fountain beverages from Pepsi-Cola. We have no minimum annual purchase requirements from this contract.

We utilize Sysco Corporation to be the primary distributor of food products to our restaurants. The agreement, which expires on February 28, 2006, requires us to utilize Sysco Corporation for the distribution of various products at all of our restaurants. In exchange for a fixed markup commitment, we are obligated to utilize Sysco for a minimum of 90% of our various product purchases.

We have entered into a contract with Edward Don for the purchase of certain restaurant equipment and supplies. In exchange for a fixed markup commitment, Edward Don will retain certain product inventory levels for distribution. We have no minimum purchase requirements. This agreement expires on September 30, 2004.

We have entered into an agreement with Solana Beach Baking Company for the purchase of bread products in exchange for a fixed price commitment. We have no minimum purchase requirements. This contract expires on December 1, 2006.

We have entered into two agreements with Cert-Fresh Foods, Inc. for the purchase of various food products. In exchange for a fixed price commitment, we are obligated to purchase a minimum quantity of shrimp. These contracts expire on February 28, 2005 and December 31, 2005.

We have entered into an agreement with Qwest Communication to provide certain telephone and communication services. The agreement expires on September 23, 2007. We are required to spend a pre-discount minimum of $50,000 per month for services provided by Qwest.

We have entered into an agreement with a third party credit card service provider to provide credit/debit card settlement services for a fixed fee per credit/debit transaction. The agreement expires on February 23, 2007.

We have entered into a consulting agreement with a real estate consultant to provide certain services related to the indentification and lease negotiation of new Buca di Beppo and Vinny T’s of Boston restaurant locations. Under the agreement, which expires on June 30, 2005, we are required to pay the consultant a brokerage fee ranging from $10,000 to $50,000 for each restaurant location that is approved by our real estate advisory committee.

We entered into an employment agreement with our Chief Executive Officer on July 22, 1996, which was subsequently amended and restated in February 1999, and further amended in September 2000, December 2002, and March 2003. The agreement as amended provides for paying certain salary, fringe benefits and bonus (subject to satisfaction of certain criteria determined by the compensation committee of the board of directors). The agreement also contains certain confidentiality, non-compete and termination payment provisions, including severance payments of 12 to 24 months. The agreement expires on December 31, 2005.

20

Table of Contents

We entered into employment agreements with both our Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer and Senior Vice President of Food & Beverage and Purchasing in December 2002. Each agreement provides for paying certain salary, fringe benefits and bonus (subject to satisfaction of certain criteria determined by the compensation committee of the board of directors). Each agreement also contains certain confidentiality, non-compete and termination payment provisions, including severance payments of 12 to 18 months. The agreements expire on December 31, 2005.

In January 2002, we established a Key Employee Stock Ownership Plan (KEYSOP) that enables certain employees the option to purchase mutual fund investments. Options awarded under the KEYSOP vest as determined by our board of directors (typically 5 years) and are exercisable after a 6-month waiting period but no later than 15 years from the grant date. Eligible employees are also allowed to allocate up to 100% of their bonus and/or base compensation into the KEYSOP. Eligible employees can exercise an option to purchase these mutual fund investments by paying 25% of the investment’s fair value at grant date. We adopted a hedging policy to purchase the full value of the option grant at the time of issuance. We had $1,854,000 at December 28, 2003 in invested assets to hedge current and future obligations under the KEYSOP.

Other than described above, we have on-going purchases of products and services that are primarily short term in nature.

For further discussion regarding our contractual obligations described above, see Notes 5, 6, 9, 10 and 11 to our Consolidated Financial Statements.

Application of Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

Our consolidated financial statements include accounts of BUCA, Inc and all of our wholly owned subsidiaries. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make judgments, assumptions and estimates that affect amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. Note 1 to our Consolidated Financial Statements describes our significant accounting policies and methods used in the preparation of the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Critical accounting policies are those we believe are both most important to the portrayal of our financial condition and operating results, and require our most difficult, subjective or complex judgments, often as a result of the need to make estimates about the effect of matters that are inherently uncertain. Judgments and uncertainties affecting the application of those policies may result in materially different amounts being reported under different conditions or using different assumptions. We consider the following policies to be most critical in understanding the judgments that are involved in preparing our consolidated financial statements.

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

We review our long-lived assets, such as fixed assets and intangible assets, for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying value amount of an asset or group of assets may not be recoverable. This analysis is done on annual basis or whenever events or changes in circumstances indicated that the carrying value may not be recoverable. We consider a history of operating losses to be a primary indicator of potential asset impairment. Assets are grouped and evaluated for impairment at the lowest level for which there are identifiable cash flows, primarily the individual restaurants. A restaurant is deemed to be impaired if a forecast of undiscounted future operating cash flows directly related to the restaurant is less than its carrying amount. If a restaurant is determined to be impaired, the loss is measured as the amount by which the carrying amount of the restaurant exceeds its fair value. Fair value is an estimate based on the best information available including estimated future cash flows, expected growth rates in comparable restaurant sales, remaining lease terms and other factors. In fiscal 2001, 2002 and 2003 we recorded asset impairment charges related to the write-down of restaurants in operation because the value of estimated future cash flows for those restaurants did not support the carrying value of their respective restaurant assets or because the capitalized developed costs became impaired for restaurants which we did not expect to open because of a reduction in our development plans.

Impairment of Goodwill

We assess the recoverability of goodwill that is related to our purchase of Vinny T’s of Boston on an annual basis and whenever events or changes in circumstance indicate the carrying value may not be recoverable. We test impairment at the concept level for this goodwill based upon the historical cash flow and other relevant facts and circumstances as the primary basis for our estimates of future cash flows. A concept is deemed to be impaired if a forecast of undiscounted future operating cash flows directly related to the concept is less than its carrying amount of fixed assets and goodwill. If goodwill is determined to be impaired, the loss is measured as the amount by which the carrying amount of the concept exceeds its fair value. Fair value is an estimate based on the best information available including estimated future cash flows, expected growth rates of comparable restaurant sales, remaining lease terms, fair value of other similar restaurant concepts and other factors. We have not taken an

21

Table of Contents

impairment of goodwill related to our purchase of Vinny T’s of Boston. If these assumptions change in the future, we may be required to take an asset impairment charge related to our goodwill.

Self-Insurance

We are self-insured for a portion of our current medical, dental, workers’ compensation and general liability insurance programs. In estimating our self-insurance reserves, we utilize estimates of future losses, based upon our historical loss trends and historical industry data. These reserves are monitored and adjusted when warranted by changing circumstances. Should a change in claims occur compared to what was estimated, our reserves could be either increased or decreased based upon that data. Any increases or decreases in insurance reserves would be offset by a corresponding increase or decrease in insurance expense.

Purchase Accounting

We account for our acquisitions under the purchase method of accounting and accordingly, the acquired assets and liabilities assumed are recorded at their respective fair values. The recorded values of assets and liabilities are based on management’s best judgments or estimates, with the assistance of third-party valuations when necessary. Our financial position and results from operations may be affected by changes in estimates and judgments. We recorded our purchase of Vinny T’s of Boston in January 2002 based upon the purchase method of accounting.

Provision for Income Taxes

We estimate certain components of our provision for income taxes. The estimates include effective state and local income tax rates, allowable tax credits for items such as FICA taxes paid on reported tip income and the work opportunity tax credit, the tax rate in which deferred taxes are recognized, and the likelihood that we will be able to utilize our deferred tax assets. Our estimates are based on the best available information at the time that we prepare the provision. All tax returns are subject to audit by federal and state governments, usually years after the tax returns are filed, and could be subject to different interpretations of the tax laws. The ultimate amount of income taxes that we pay may be higher or lower than our estimates. We record a tax valuation allowance when it is more likely than not that we will not be able to recover the value of our deferred tax assets. In fiscal 2003, we recorded a $2.7 million tax valuation allowance related to our deferred tax assets.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In May 2003, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 150, Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Characteristics of Both Liabilities and Equity. This Statement requires that certain instruments that were previously classified as equity on a company’s statement of financial position now be classified as liabilities. The Statement is effective for financial instruments entered into or modified after May 31, 2003, and to all other instruments that exist as of the beginning of the first interim financial reporting period beginning after June 15, 2003. We currently have no instruments impacted by the adoption of this Statement and therefore the adoption did not have an effect on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

In fiscal 2003 we adopted Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) No. 02-16, Accounting by a Customer for Certain Consideration Received from a Vendor. EITF No. 02-16 is effective for arrangements entered into after December 31, 2002. We receive contributions from trade vendors in varying amounts in support of our annual paisano management conference, which all of our paisano partners attend. In 2003, $970,000 in contributions received was recorded as a reduction in the related product cost, direct and occupancy cost, general and administrative cost, or fixed asset capital expenditure purchased from such vendors, in accordance with EITF 02-16. In previous years these contributions were recorded as a reduction of the cost of the event, which was recorded in general and administrative expenses.

In December 2003, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 46 (revised 2003), Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities (FIN 46 (revised)), which revised FASB Interpretation No. 46, Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities (FIN 46). FIN 46 (revised) clarifies the application of Accounting Research Bulletin No. 51, Consolidated Financial Statements, to certain entities in which equity investors do not have the characteristics of a controlling financial interest or do not have sufficient equity at risk for the entity to finance its activities without additional subordinated support. An enterprise shall consolidate a variable interest entity if that enterprise is the primary beneficiary. An enterprise is considered the primary beneficiary if it has a variable interest that will absorb a majority of the entity’s expected losses, receive a majority of the entity’s expected residual returns or both. We do not expect FIN 46 (revised) to have an impact on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

For further information on SFAS No.150, EITF No. 02-16 and FIN 46 (revised), see Note 1 to our Consolidated Financial Statements.

22

Table of Contents

Inflation

The primary inflationary factors affecting our operations are food, labor, property tax and utility costs. A large number of our restaurant personnel are paid at rates based on the applicable minimum wage and increases in the minimum wage directly affect our labor costs. To date, inflation has not had a material impact on our operating results.

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure about Market Risk

We are exposed to market risk from changes in interest rates on borrowings under our revolving line of credit that bears interest at the lower of our lender’s reference rate plus 0.75% to 2.25% or Eurodollar rate plus 2.25% to 3.75% (3.34% to 4.84% as of March 3, 2004). As of March 3, 2004, we had $24 million outstanding in debt borrowings under our credit facility. Thus, a 1% change in interest rates would cause annual interest expense to increase by $240,000.

We have no derivative financial instruments or derivative commodity instruments in our cash and cash equivalents.

Many of the food products purchased by us are affected by commodity pricing and are, therefore, subject to price volatility caused by weather, production problems, delivery difficulties and other factors that are outside our control. To control this risk in part, we have fixed price purchase commitments for food and supplies from vendors who supply our national food distributor. In addition, we believe that substantially all of our food and supplies are available from several sources, which helps to control food commodity risks. We believe we have the ability to increase menu prices, or vary the menu items offered, if needed, in response to a food product price increase. To compensate for a hypothetical price increase of 10% for food and beverages, we would need to increase menu prices by an average of 2.5%, which is only slightly more than our average price increases of approximately 1% in fiscal 2004, 2% in fiscal 2003, and 1% in fiscal 2002. Accordingly, we believe that a hypothetical 10% increase in food product costs would not have a material effect on our operating results.

See the Consolidated Financial Statements filed with this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

None.

As of the end of the period covered by this report, we conducted an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of the principal executive officer and principal financial officer, of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-14(c) and 15d-14(c) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”)). Based on this evaluation, the principal executive officer and principal financial officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in Securities and Exchange Commission rules and forms. There was no change in our internal control over financial reporting during our most recently completed fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

PART III

Incorporated by reference into this Annual Report on Form 10-K is the information appearing under the headings “Election of Directors” and “Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance” in our Proxy Statement for the annual meeting of shareholders to be held on May 4, 2004. Information relating to our executive officers is provided in Part I of this Annual Report on Form 10-K under the heading “Item X. Executive Officers of the Registrant.”

Our board of directors has determined that at least one member of our Audit Committee, John P. Whaley, is an “audit committee financial expert,” as that term is defined under Section 407 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and the rules promulgated by the

23

Table of Contents

SEC in furtherance of Section 407. Mr. Whaley is independent, as that term is defined under the National Association of Securities Dealers’ listing standards.

Code of Business Conduct and Ethics

We have adopted a code of business conduct and ethics applicable to all of our directors and employees, including our principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer, controller and other employees performing similar functions. A copy of this code of business conduct and ethics is available on our website at www.bucainc.com.

We intend to disclose any waiver of our code of business conduct and ethics for our directors or executive officers in future Form 8-K filings within five business days following the date of such waiver. We also intend to satisfy the disclosure requirement under Item 10 of Form 8-K regarding an amendment to, or waiver from, a provision of our code of business conduct and ethics by posting such information on our website at the address specified above.

Incorporated by reference into this Annual Report on Form 10-K is the information appearing under the headings “Executive Compensation” and “Director Compensation” in our Proxy Statement for the annual meeting of shareholders to be held on May 4, 2004.

Incorporated by reference into this Annual Report on Form 10-K is the information appearing under the headings “Stock Ownership of Directors, Officers and Principal Shareholders” and “Equity Compensation Plan Information” in our Proxy Statement for the annual meeting of shareholders to be held on May 4, 2004.

Incorporated by reference into this Annual Report on Form 10-K is the information appearing under the heading “Certain Transactions” in our Proxy Statement for the annual meeting of shareholders to be held on May 4, 2004.

Incorporated by reference into this Annual Report on Form 10-K is the information appearing under the headings “Independent Auditors’ Fees” and “Auditor Independence” in our proxy statement for the annual meeting of shareholders to be held on May 4, 2004.

PART IV

None.

24

Table of Contents

25

Table of Contents

We filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission a Current Report on Form 8-K on October 23, 2003 furnishing under “Item 7. Financial Statements and Exhibits” and “Item 12. Results of Operations and Financial Condition” a copy of the press release, dated October 22, 2003.

26

Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, on March 12, 2004.

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this Report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities indicated on March 12, 2004.

27

Table of Contents

BUCA, INC.

INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

F-1

Table of Contents

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS’ REPORT

Board of Directors

BUCA, Inc. and Subsidiaries

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of BUCA, Inc. and Subsidiaries (the Company) as of December 29, 2002 and December 28, 2003, and the related consolidated statements of operations, shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the three fiscal years in the period ended December 28, 2003. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall consolidated financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of BUCA, Inc. and Subsidiaries as of December 29, 2002 and December 28, 2003, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three fiscal years in the period ended December 28, 2003 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

As discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, effective January 1, 2003 the Company changed its method of accounting for contributions received from vendors in support of certain operating expenses.

March 8, 2004

F-2

Table of Contents

BUCA, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Balance Sheets

(in thousands, except share data)

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

F-3

Table of Contents

BUCA, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Statements of Operations

(in thousands, except share and per share data)