Back to GetFilings.com

Table of Contents

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003

COMMISSION FILE NUMBER: 001-13243

PAN PACIFIC RETAIL PROPERTIES, INC.

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (760) 727-1002

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

None

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨.

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of Registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. x

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes x No ¨.

The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates computed by reference to the price at which the common equity was last sold as of the last business day of the Registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter was approximately $1,574,600,000.

As of March 5, 2004, the number of shares of the Registrant’s common stock outstanding was 40,355,381.

Pan Pacific Retail Properties, Inc.’s Definitive Proxy Statement for the 2004 annual meeting of stockholders is incorporated by reference into Part III herein.

Table of Contents

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

Part III of this report on Form 10-K incorporates by reference information from our definitive proxy statement for our 2004 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission within 120 days of the close of our fiscal year.

PAN PACIFIC RETAIL PROPERTIES, INC.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Table of Contents

PART I

We are a self-administered and self-managed real estate investment trust, or REIT. Our portfolio consists principally of community and neighborhood shopping centers predominantly located in five key Western U.S. markets.

At December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001 our total assets were $1,863,348,000, $1,424,240,000 and $1,339,290,000, respectively. At December 31, 2003, we owned a portfolio comprised of 130 shopping center properties, of which 124 are located in the Western United States in our five key markets including 40 in Northern California, 37 in Southern California, 21 in Oregon, 14 in Washington and 12 in Nevada. The portfolio includes approximately 20.8 million square feet of retail space, which was 95.4% leased to a diverse mix of 3,199 tenants.

On November 13, 2000, we acquired Western Properties Trust, a California real estate investment trust. The transaction was a stock for stock exchange whereby Western common shares and units were exchanged for newly issued shares of our common stock and operating subsidiary units, based upon a fixed exchange ratio of 0.62. In connection with this transaction, we assumed Western’s obligations under its senior notes and the indentures under which they were issued. As a result, we issued 10,754,776 shares of our common stock to holders of Western common shares and were obligated to issue 911,934 shares of our common stock upon the exchange of operating subsidiary units held by limited partners of Pan Pacific (Kienows), L.P., formerly Western/Kienow, L.P., and Pan Pacific (Pinecreek), L.P., formerly Western/Pinecreek, L.P.

On January 17, 2003, we acquired Center Trust, Inc., a Maryland corporation. The transaction was a stock for stock exchange including assumption of debt whereby each share of Center Trust common stock was exchanged for 0.218 newly issued shares of our common stock. As a result, we issued 6,084,499 shares of our common stock to Center Trust stockholders and were obligated to issue up to 284,263 shares of our common stock to limited partners of CT Operating Partnership, L.P. upon the exchange of operating partnership units held by them.

We employed 135 people as of December 31, 2003, including eleven executive officers and senior personnel, in the areas of administration, accounting services, property management, maintenance, leasing, acquisitions and business development. Our executive offices are located at 1631-B South Melrose Drive, Vista, California 92081, and our telephone number is (760) 727-1002. In addition to personnel located at our executive offices, we operate regional offices in Las Vegas, Nevada; Kent, Washington; Portland, Oregon; and Sacramento, California. Each of our regional offices is responsible for property management, maintenance and leasing.

We have elected to be taxed as a REIT under Sections 856 through 860 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. We believe that we have been organized and have operated in such a manner so as to qualify for taxation as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code, and we intend to continue to operate in such a manner, but we cannot assure you that we will continue to operate in such a manner so as to qualify or remain qualified. Even if we qualify for taxation as a REIT, we may be subject to certain federal, state and local taxes on our revenue and properties.

You can access free of charge a copy of the periodic and current reports we file with the Securities and Exchange Commission at www.sec.gov. Additionally, our periodic and current reports, such as our Forms 10-K, 10-Q and 8-K as well as all amendments to those filings, are made available on our website at www.pprp.com as soon as reasonably practicable after these reports are filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. You can also access on our website our Code for Senior Officers, Policy for Reporting Complaints and Violations, Audit Committee Charter, Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee Charter and Compensation Committee Charter.

Business Strategies

Our business strategies involve three fundamental practices:

1

Table of Contents

Growth Strategies

Our principal growth strategy is to acquire shopping centers that provide an opportunity to expand in current markets or which allow us to establish a presence in targeted markets with favorable economic and demographic characteristics.

We also seek to maximize the cash flow from our properties by continuing to enhance the operating performance of each property through our in-house leasing and property management programs.

We pursue:

Financing Strategies

Our financing strategies are to maintain a strong and flexible financial position by maintaining a prudent level of leverage, maintaining a pool of unencumbered assets and managing our variable interest rate exposure. We intend to finance future acquisitions with the most advantageous source of capital available to us at the time of an acquisition, which may include the sale of common stock, preferred stock or debt securities through public offerings or private placements, the incurrence of additional indebtedness through secured or unsecured borrowings and the issuance of operating units of a subsidiary in exchange for contributed property.

During 1998, we formed Pan Pacific (Portland), LLC with us as sole managing member. In exchange for four properties which were contributed to Pan Pacific (Portland), 832,617 units were issued to certain non-managing members. During 2001, 400,000 units were redeemed for common stock. No units were redeemed in 2002. In 2003, 100,000 units were redeemed for common stock and 131,590 units were redeemed for cash of $5,540,000.

2

Table of Contents

During 1999, we completed a number of financing transactions. At the end of the second quarter, we closed a $35,000,000 financing transaction evidenced by notes, bearing interest at 7.2%, due in July 2006 and secured by deeds of trust on two properties, Rainbow Promenade and San Dimas Marketplace. At the beginning of the third quarter, we closed a second financing transaction for $56,300,000 evidenced by notes, bearing interest at 7.1%, due in August 2009 and secured by deeds of trust on four properties, Melrose Village Plaza, Monterey Plaza, Tustin Heights Shopping Center and Tanasbourne Village. The proceeds were used to pay down our unsecured credit facility.

In the third quarter of 1999, we formed Pan Pacific (Rancho Las Palmas), LLC and Pan Pacific (RLP), Inc. in connection with the acquisition of the Rancho Las Palmas shopping center. We and Pan Pacific (RLP) are co-managing members of Pan Pacific (Rancho Las Palmas). As part of this acquisition and in exchange for an interest in the asset contributed to Pan Pacific (Rancho Las Palmas) by an individual, 314,587 non-managing member units were issued to this individual. Distributions are made to this non-managing member at a rate equal to dividend distributions paid by us on a share of our common stock. The non-managing member can seek redemption of its units after the first anniversary. We, at our option, may redeem the units by either (i) issuing common stock at the rate of one share for each unit, or (ii) by paying cash for units based on a ten day average stock price. As of December 31, 2003, no units have been redeemed.

In December 1999, we extended our $200,000,000 revolving credit facility for an additional three years. In October 1999, we received an investment grade credit rating from Standard & Poor’s. Because of this rating, the borrowing rate on our revolving credit facility was reduced to LIBOR plus 1.15%. In November 2000, we also received an investment grade credit rating from Moody’s Investors Service.

In connection with our acquisition of Western in November 2000, we entered into new financing arrangements including a $300,000,000 revolving credit facility and a $100,000,000 term credit loan. The revolving credit facility was set to mature in January 2004 and was amended and restated in March 2003 as discussed in more detail below. The term credit loan was repaid in full in July 2001. Our borrowing rate under the revolving credit facility was LIBOR plus 1.10% while the borrowing rate under the term credit loan was LIBOR plus 1.20%.

In connection with our acquisition of Western, we assumed Western’s obligations including its Unsecured Senior Notes in an aggregate principal amount of $50,000,000 bearing interest at 7.875% due 2004, $25,000,000 bearing interest at 7.10% due 2006, $25,000,000 bearing interest at 7.20% due 2008 and $25,000,000 bearing interest at 7.30% due 2010, and the indentures under which these notes were issued. We also assumed a mortgage note bearing interest at 7.61% due May 2004 in the principal amount of $9,628,000, secured by a deed of trust on Lakewood Village.

In April 2001, we issued $150,000,000 in aggregate principal amount of 7.95% senior notes due April 2011. We sold these notes at 99.225% of the principal amount. We used the net proceeds from the offering to pay off our term credit loan and to repay borrowings under our revolving credit facility.

We were the managing member of a joint venture, created for the purpose of developing Olympia Place in Walnut Creek, California. The joint venture entered into a construction loan agreement in December 2001 to borrow up to $25,800,000 to fund the development. At our option, amounts borrowed under the construction loan bore interest at either LIBOR plus 1.95% or a reference rate. At December 31, 2002 and December 31, 2001, $15,601,000 and $0, respectively, had been drawn on the construction loan. The construction loan was repaid in full in September 2003. In June 2003 we acquired 100 % of the non-managing member’s interest in the joint venture resulting in this LLC becoming wholly-owned by us. We subsequently merged the joint venture entity into Pan Pacific Retail Properties, Inc. At December 31, 2003 the development was essentially complete and will be included in our operating properties beginning in the first quarter of 2004.

In June 2002, we issued $55,000,000 in aggregate principal amount of 5.75% senior notes due June 2007. We sold these notes at 99.458% of the principal amount and used the net proceeds from the offering to repay borrowings under our revolving credit facility. In December 2002, we issued $100,000,000 in aggregate principal amount of 6.125% senior notes due January 2013. We sold these notes at par value and used the net proceeds from the offering to repay borrowings under our revolving credit facility.

We are a general partner of a joint venture, which owns a medical office building in Encinitas, California. During the second quarter of 2002, the joint venture entered into a loan agreement for $18,000,000, bearing interest at 7%, to purchase the building on the property. At December 31, 2003 and 2002, the balance of the loan was $17,735,000 and $17,901,000, respectively. The loan is secured by the property and is not guaranteed by us. We

3

Table of Contents

account for this joint venture under the equity method. This unconsolidated debt is one of two off-balance-sheet financings to which we are a party.

On September 30, 2002, Plaza Escuela Holding Co., LLC completed a financing transaction with an initial funding of $38,087,000, bearing interest at 6.8%, through which we received a partial payoff of $36,754,000 on our note receivable of $44,349,000 on the Plaza Escuela property in Walnut Creek, California. The remaining balance of our note of $7,595,000 was converted to a 49% non-managing member interest in Plaza Escuela Holding Co., LLC, the entity that owns the property. In January 2003, we received a return of capital of $3,990,000. In May 2003, we received a return of capital of $800,000. In August 2003, we received a return of capital of $1,000,000. Our remaining equity position of $1,805,000 continues to earn a preferred return of 12%. In addition, we are entitled to receive 25% of the operating cash flows from the property through November 2008. Proceeds from the returns of capital and cash flow participation will be used primarily to repay borrowings under our revolving credit facility. At December 31, 2003, the balance of the Plaza Escuela Holding Co., LLC loan was $41,529,000. The loan is secured by the property and is not guaranteed by us. We account for this joint venture under the equity method. This unconsolidated debt is one of two off-balance-sheet financings to which we are a party.

On November 5, 2002, we entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger with Center Trust, Inc., a Maryland corporation. The transaction, which closed January 17, 2003, included interests in 27 shopping centers, two regional malls and two single tenant assets. The transaction was a stock for stock exchange, including assumption of $362,257,000 of debt, whereby each share of Center Trust common stock was exchanged for 0.218 newly issued shares of our common stock. As a result, we issued 6,084,499 shares of our common stock to Center Trust stockholders and 284,263 units were issued to limited partners of CT Operating Partnership, L.P. upon the exchange of operating partnership units held by them. Distributions are made to the limited partners at a rate equal to the dividend distribution paid by us on a share of our common stock. A limited partner can seek redemption of their units at any time. We may, at our option, upon receipt of a redemption notice, redeem the units by either (i) issuing common stock at the rate of one share for each unit, or (ii) by paying cash for units based on a ten day average stock price. In 2003, 33,964 units were redeemed for cash of $1,246,000.

In March 2003, we entered into an amended and restated unsecured $300,000,000 revolving credit facility which bears interest, at our option, at either LIBOR plus 0.70% or a reference rate. This credit facility expires in March 2006. At December 31, 2003 and 2002, the amount drawn on this line of credit was $48,250,000 and $66,000,000, respectively, and the interest rate was 1.86% and 2.97%, respectively. The credit facility requires us to pay a quarterly fee of 0.20% per annum on the total aggregate commitment. We at our sole option may increase the amount of the commitment up to $400,000,000 and extend the maturity date to March 2007, assuming satisfaction of certain conditions.

In June 2003, we issued $75,000,000 in aggregate principal amount of 4.70% senior notes due June 2013. We sold these notes at 99.755% of the principal amount and used the net proceeds from the offering to repay borrowings under its line of credit.

During 2003, nine non-strategic assets were sold, including two regional malls that were acquired as part of the Center Trust acquisition, which generated net cash proceeds of approximately $190,000,000 which were used primarily to repay borrowings under our revolving credit facility.

Dispositions

We dispose of non-strategic assets if we can obtain attractive terms on the sale and redeploy the proceeds into acquisitions in our core markets with growth opportunities.

During 1999, we disposed of three non-strategic assets. We took back a portion of the proceeds on one sale in the form of a note receivable secured by a deed of trust. The balance of the net proceeds, as well as the net proceeds from another sale, received in cash, were used to repay indebtedness under our revolving credit facility. The net proceeds from the other sale were placed with an exchange accommodator and used to acquire another strategic shopping center property in a like-kind exchange transaction pursuant to Section 1031 of the Internal Revenue Code.

In December 2000, we disposed of a single-tenant non-strategic asset located in Santa Cruz, California. The asset was a part of the Western portfolio and was sold for an amount equal to its net book value. We took back a portion of the proceeds as a note receivable secured by a deed of trust. The balance of the net proceeds, received in cash, was placed with an exchange accommodator and used to acquire a shopping center property in a like-kind exchange transaction pursuant to Section 1031 of the Internal Revenue Code.

4

Table of Contents

During 2001, we disposed of a non-strategic shopping center, five single tenant assets, a 30% interest we owned in a shopping center and four parcels of land. We took back a portion of the proceeds as a note receivable secured by a deed of trust on the sale of the non-strategic shopping center. The balance of the net proceeds on this sale, received in cash, was used to repay indebtedness under our revolving credit facility. The net proceeds on the sale of one of the single tenant assets was also received in cash and was used to repay indebtedness under our revolving credit facility. The net proceeds on the remaining sales were placed with an exchange accommodator and used to acquire other strategic shopping center properties in like-kind exchange transactions pursuant to Section 1031 of the Internal Revenue Code.

During 2002, we disposed of seven shopping centers, two single tenant assets and one parcel of land. We took back a portion of the proceeds on these sales in the form of three notes receivable secured by deeds of trust. The balance of the net proceeds on the sales, received in cash, were placed with an exchange accommodator and used to acquire other strategic shopping center properties in like-kind exchange transactions pursuant to Section 1031 of the Internal Revenue Code.

During 2003, we disposed of two regional malls acquired in the Center Trust merger, six shopping centers and an office building parcel. We took back a portion of the proceeds on these sales in the form of three notes receivable secured by deeds of trust, two of which were paid off by December 31, 2003. The balance of the net proceeds on the sales was received in cash. On four of the sales, the cash proceeds were placed with an exchange accommodator and used to acquire other strategic shopping center properties in like-kind exchange transactions pursuant to Section 1031 of the Internal Revenue Code.

We may dispose of certain non-strategic assets over the next year. However, if after taking into account the tax consequences of any disposition, including our continued ability to qualify as a REIT, we determine that a disposition would not be in our best interest, we will not dispose of such asset.

Competition

There are numerous other developers and real estate companies (both public and private), financial institutions and other investors engaged in the development, acquisition and operation of shopping centers and commercial property which compete with us in our trade areas. This results in competition for both acquisitions of existing income-producing properties and for tenants to occupy the space that we and our competitors develop, acquire and manage.

We believe that the principal competitive factors in attracting tenants in our market areas are location, price, anchor tenants and maintenance of properties. We also believe that our competitive advantages include the favorable locations of our properties, our ability to provide a retailer with multiple locations with anchor tenants and the practice of continuous maintenance and renovation of our properties as is appropriate.

No single competitor or group of competitors in any of our chosen markets is believed to be dominant in that market. However, their competition may:

Retailers at our properties also face increasing competition from outlet stores, discount shopping clubs, and other forms of marketing of goods, such as direct mail, internet marketing and telemarketing. This competition could contribute to lease defaults and insolvency of our tenants.

5

Table of Contents

Certain Cautionary Statements

There are Certain Risks Inherent to Investment in Real Estate. Real property investments are subject to varying degrees of risk. The yields available from equity investments in real estate depend in large part on the amount of income generated and expenses incurred. If our properties do not generate revenue sufficient to meet operating expenses, including debt service, tenant improvements, leasing commissions and other capital expenditures, we may have to borrow additional amounts to cover fixed costs. This would adversely affect our cash flow and ability to service our debt and make distributions to our stockholders.

Our revenue and the value of our properties may be adversely affected by a number of factors, including:

In addition, real estate values and income from properties are also affected by factors such as applicable laws, including tax laws, interest rate levels and the availability of financing.

We May be Unable to Retain Tenants and Relet Space. We will be subject to the risks that, upon expiration or termination, leases may not be renewed, the space may not be relet or the terms of renewal or reletting (including the cost of required renovations) may be less favorable than current lease terms. Leases covering a total of approximately 6.5% and 51.7% of the leased gross leasable area, or GLA, of our properties will expire through the end of 2004 and 2008, respectively. We budget for renovation and reletting expenses, which takes into consideration our view of both the current and expected market conditions in the geographic regions in which our properties are located, but budgeted amounts may be insufficient to cover these costs. Our cash flow and ability to make expected distributions to stockholders could be adversely affected, if:

We may not realize all of the anticipated benefits of the merger. The success of our acquisition of Center Trust will depend, in part, on our ability to realize the anticipated cost savings, operating efficiencies and other synergies from integrating the properties of Center Trust into our portfolio. Our success in realizing these benefits and the timing of this realization depend upon our ability to integrate the operations of Center Trust with our own in an efficient manner. The integration of two independent companies is a complex, costly and time-consuming process. Unforeseen difficulties in integrating these portfolios may cause disruption of, or a loss of momentum in, the activities of our business that could affect its ability to achieve expected cost savings, operating efficiencies and other synergies in a manner that could materially harm our financial performance.

6

Table of Contents

The difficulties of combining the operations of the companies include, among others:

We cannot guarantee that the integration of Center Trust will result in the realization of the full benefits we had anticipated.

Changes in the Economic or Other Market Conditions in Certain Geographic Regions Could Adversely Affect Our Results of Operations. As of December 31, 2003, we have 40 properties with total GLA of 5,665,000 square feet located in Northern California, 37 properties with total GLA of 6,322,000 square feet located in Southern California, 21 properties with total GLA of 3,386,000 square feet located in Oregon, 14 properties with total GLA of 2,356,000 square feet located in Washington and 12 properties with total GLA of 2,098,000 square feet located in Nevada. To the extent that general economic or other relevant conditions in these regions decline and result in a decrease in consumer demand in these regions, the results of our operations may be adversely affected.

We May Not be Able to Respond Quickly to Changing Market Conditions Due to the Illiquidity of Real Estate. Equity real estate investments are relatively illiquid. This illiquidity limits our ability to adjust our portfolio promptly in response to changes in economic or other conditions. In addition, the Internal Revenue Code limits a REIT’s ability to sell properties held for fewer than four years, which may limit our ability to sell our properties at optimal times and for the highest price.

Competition with Other Developers and Real Estate Companies Could Materially Affect Our Ability to Generate Net Income, Service Our Debt and Make Distributions to Our Stockholders. There are numerous commercial developers and real estate companies that compete with us in seeking tenants for properties, properties for acquisition and land for development. There are numerous shopping facilities that compete with our properties in attracting retailers to lease space. In addition, retailers at our properties face increasing competition from outlet stores, discount shopping clubs, and other forms of marketing of goods, such as direct mail, internet marketing and telemarketing. This competition may reduce properties available for acquisition or development, reduce percentage rents payable to us and may, through the introduction of competition, contribute to lease defaults or insolvency of tenants. Thus, competition could materially affect our ability to generate net income, service our debt and make distributions to our stockholders.

Compliance with Changes in Laws May Result in Significant Unexpected Expenditures. Because increases in income, service or transfer taxes are generally not passed through to tenants under leases, these increases may adversely affect our cash flow and our ability to service our debt and make distributions to stockholders. Our properties are also subject to various federal, state and local regulatory requirements, such as requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 and state and local fire and life safety requirements. Failure to comply with these requirements could result in the imposition of fines by governmental authorities or awards of damages to private litigants. In addition, these requirements may not be changed and new requirements may be imposed that would require significant unanticipated expenditures by us. Any of these events could adversely affect our cash flow and expected distributions.

We Rely on Certain Tenants and Anchors and the Closing of One or More Anchor-Occupied Store Could Adversely Affect that Property, Resulting in Lease Terminations and Reductions in Rent. Our income and funds from operations could be adversely affected in the event of the bankruptcy or insolvency, or a downturn in the business, of any anchor store, or if any anchor tenant does not renew its lease when it expires. If tenant sales at our properties were to decline, tenants might be unable to pay their rent or other occupancy costs. In the event of default by a tenant, delays and costs in enforcing our rights could be experienced. In addition, the closing of one or more anchor-occupied stores or lease termination by one or more anchor tenants of a shopping center, whose leases may

7

Table of Contents

permit termination, could adversely impact that property and result in lease terminations or reductions in rent by other tenants, whose leases may permit termination or rent reduction in those circumstances. This could adversely affect our ability to re-lease the space that is vacated. Each of these developments could adversely affect our funds from operations and our ability to service our debt and make expected distributions to stockholders. For the year ended December 31, 2003, our annualized base rent attributable to anchor tenants was 39.2% of our total annualized base rent.

There is a Lack of Operating History With Respect to Our Recent Acquisition and Development of Properties and We May Not Succeed in the Integration or Management of Additional Properties. At December 31, 2003, we owned and operated 130 properties, consisting of approximately 20.8 million square feet of space. Fifty-three of our properties were acquired during 2000, primarily through the acquisition of Western. These properties, together with other individual acquisitions and the 31 properties which we acquired in 2003 in connection with our acquisition of Center Trust, some of which have been sold, may have characteristics or deficiencies currently unknown to us that affect their value or revenue potential. It is also possible that the operating performance of these properties may decline under our management. As we acquire additional properties, we will be subject to risks associated with managing new properties, including lease-up and tenant retention. In addition, our ability to manage our growth effectively will require us to successfully integrate our new acquisitions into our existing management structure. We may not succeed with this integration or effectively manage additional properties. Also, newly acquired properties may not perform as expected.

Our Indebtedness Could Adversely Affect Our Financial Results. We are subject to risks normally associated with debt financing, including:

At December 31, 2003, we had outstanding indebtedness of approximately $897,035,000. Since we anticipate that only a small portion of the principal of the indebtedness will be repaid prior to maturity, and that we will not have funds on hand sufficient to repay the balance of the indebtedness in full at maturity, it will be necessary for us to refinance the debt either through additional borrowings or equity or debt offerings. If principal payments due at maturity cannot be refinanced, extended or paid with proceeds of other capital transactions, we expect that our cash flow will not be sufficient in all years to pay distributions at expected levels and to repay all of this maturing debt. Also, if prevailing interest rates or other factors at the time of refinancing (such as the reluctance of lenders to make commercial real estate loans) result in higher interest rates upon refinancing, the interest expense relating to refinanced indebtedness would increase. This could adversely affect our cash flow and our ability to make expected distributions to our stockholders. In addition, if we are unable to refinance the indebtedness on acceptable terms, we might dispose of properties upon disadvantageous terms, which might result in losses to us and might adversely affect funds available for distribution to stockholders.

Potential Defaults Under Mortgage Financing Could Negatively Impact Our Financial Success. At December 31, 2003, we had approximately $345,077,000 of mortgage financing and property level bonds. The payment and other obligations under certain of the mortgage financing is secured by cross-collateralized and cross-defaulted first mortgage liens in the aggregate amount of approximately $52,794,000 on four properties, $50,830,000 on four other properties, $49,954,000 on four other properties, $41,388,000 on three properties, $15,863,000 on three other properties and $32,401,000 on two properties. If we are unable to meet our obligations under the mortgage financing, the properties securing that debt could be foreclosed upon. This could have a material adverse effect on us and our ability to make expected distributions and could threaten our continued viability.

Rising Interest Rates on Our Variable-Rate Debt Could Negatively Impact our Financial Success. Advances under our revolving credit agreement bear interest at a variable-rate. In addition, we may incur other variable-rate indebtedness in the future. Increases in interest rates on that indebtedness would increase our interest expense, which could adversely affect our cash flow and our ability to service our debt and pay expected distributions to stockholders.

8

Table of Contents

Loss of Our Tax Status as a Real Estate Investment Trust Would Have Significant Adverse Consequence to Us and the Value of Our Securities. Commencing with our taxable year ended December 31, 1997, we believe that we have qualified as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code. Qualification as a REIT involves the satisfaction of numerous requirements (some on an annual and some on a quarterly basis) established under highly technical and complex Internal Revenue Code provisions for which there are only limited judicial and administrative interpretations. These requirements involve the determination of various facts and circumstances not entirely within our control. Legislation, new regulations, administrative interpretations or court decisions may adversely affect, possibly retroactively, our ability to qualify as a REIT or the federal income tax consequences of such qualification.

If we fail to qualify as a REIT in any taxable year, among other things:

As a result of these factors, our failure to qualify as a real estate investment trust also could impair our ability to expand our business and raise capital, could substantially reduce the funds available for distribution to our stockholders and could reduce the trading price of our common stock.

We are Subject to Certain Distribution Requirements Which Could Require Us to Borrow on a Short-Term Basis. To maintain our status as a REIT for federal income tax purposes, we generally are required to distribute to our stockholders at least 90% of our REIT taxable income determined without regard to the dividends paid deduction and by excluding net capital gains each year. We also are subject to tax at regular corporate rates to the extent that we distribute less than 100% of our REIT taxable income (including net capital gains) each year. In addition, we are subject to a 4% nondeductible excise tax on the amount, if any, by which certain distributions we pay, with respect to any calendar year, are less than the sum of 85% of our ordinary income for that calendar year, 95% of our capital gain net income for the calendar year, and any amount of that income that was not distributed in prior years.

We intend to continue to make distributions to our stockholders to comply with the distribution requirements of the Internal Revenue Code and to reduce exposure to federal income taxes and the nondeductible excise tax. Differences in timing between the receipt of income and the payment of expenses in arriving at taxable income and the effect of required debt amortization payments could require us to borrow funds to meet the distribution requirements that are necessary to achieve the tax benefits associated with qualifying as a REIT.

Acquisition and Development Investments May Not Perform as Expected. We intend to continue acquiring, developing and redeveloping shopping center properties. Acquisitions of retail properties entail risks that investments will fail to perform as expected. Estimates of development costs and costs of improvements, to bring an acquired property up to standards established for the market position intended for that property, may prove inaccurate.

We intend to expand or renovate our properties from time to time. Expansion and renovation projects generally require expenditure of capital as well as various government and other approvals, which we may not receive. While our policies with respect to expansion and renovation activities are intended to limit some of the risks otherwise associated with such activities, we will still incur certain risks, including expenditures of funds on, and devotion of management’s time to, projects that may not be completed. The Company intends to renovate properties only to the extent necessary to keep the properties in good working order. These renovations generally involve minor as-needed projects such as painting and landscaping.

9

Table of Contents

We anticipate that future acquisitions, development and renovations will be financed through a combination of advances under our revolving credit agreement and other forms of secured or unsecured financing. If new developments are financed through construction loans, there is a risk that, upon completion of construction, permanent financing for newly developed properties may not be available or may be available only on disadvantageous terms.

It is possible that we will expand our business to new geographic markets in the future. We will not initially possess the same level of familiarity with new markets outside of the geographic areas in which our properties are currently located. This could adversely affect our ability to acquire, develop, manage or lease properties in any new localities.

We also intend to develop and construct shopping centers in accordance with our business and growth strategies. Risks associated with our development and construction activities may include:

In addition, new development activities, regardless of whether they would ultimately be successful, typically require a substantial portion of management’s time and attention. Development activities would also be subject to risks relating to our inability to obtain, or delays in obtaining, all necessary zoning, land use, building, occupancy, and other required governmental permits and authorizations.

Our Properties May Be Subject to Unknown Environmental Liabilities. We are required to comply with federal, state and local laws, ordinances and regulations regarding health and safety and the protection of the environment. Under various federal, state and local environmental laws, ordinances and regulations, a current or previous owner or operator of real estate may be required to investigate and clean up hazardous or toxic substances or petroleum product releases at the property. A current or previous owner or operator may also be held liable to a governmental entity or to third parties for property damage and for investigation and clean-up costs incurred by these parties in connection with any such contamination. These laws typically impose clean-up responsibility and liability without regard to fault or whether the owner knew of or caused the presence of the contaminants. Liability under these laws may still be imposed even when the contaminants were associated with previous owners or operators and the liability under these laws has been interpreted to be joint and several, unless the harm is divisible and there is a reasonable basis for allocation of responsibility. The costs of investigation, remediation or removal of these substances may be substantial, and the presence of these substances, or the failure to properly remediate the contamination on the property, may adversely affect the owner’s ability to sell or rent the property or to borrow using the property as collateral. The presence of contamination at a property can impair the value of the property even if the contamination is migrating onto the property from an adjoining property.

A current or previous owner or operator who arranges for the disposal or treatment of hazardous or toxic substances at a disposal or treatment facility may be held liable for the costs of removal or remediation of a release of hazardous or toxic substances at the disposal or treatment facility if a leak or contamination is discovered at the disposal or treatment facility, whether or not the facility is owned or operated by them. In addition, some environmental laws create a lien on the contaminated site in favor of the government for damages and costs incurred in connection with the contamination. The remedy to remediate contamination may include deed restriction or institutional control which can restrict how the property may be used. Finally, the owner of a site may be subject to common law claims by third parties based on damages and costs resulting from environmental contamination stemming from the site, including toxic tort claims.

10

Table of Contents

Some federal, state and local laws, regulations and ordinances govern the removal, encapsulation or disturbance of asbestos containing materials, or ACMs, when these materials are in poor condition or in the event of construction, remodeling, renovation or demolition of a building. These laws may impose liability for release of ACMs and may allow third parties to seek recovery from owners or operators of real properties for personal injury associated with ACMs. In connection with our ownership and operation of our properties, we may be potentially liable for ACM related costs.

The presence of hazardous substances on or under a property may adversely affect our ability to sell that property and we may incur substantial remediation costs. Although our leases generally require our tenants to operate in compliance with all applicable federal, state and local laws, ordinance and regulations and to indemnify us against any environmental liabilities arising from the tenant’s activities on the property, we could nevertheless be subject to strict liability by virtue of our ownership interest, and there can be no assurance that our tenants would satisfy their indemnification obligations under the leases. The discovery of environmental liabilities attached to our properties could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations or financial condition or our ability to make distributions to stockholders.

Shopping centers may have businesses such as dry cleaners and auto repair or servicing businesses that handle, store and generate small quantities of hazardous wastes. The operation may result in spills or releases that may result in soil or groundwater contamination. Independent environmental consultants have conducted or updated Phase I Environmental Site Assessments at our properties in conformance with the scope and limitations of the American Society of Testing and Materials Practice E1527, Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments: Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Process. These Phase I Assessments have included, among other things, a visual inspection of our properties and the surrounding area and a review of relevant state, federal and historical documents. When recommended in the Phase I Assessments, we have conducted Phase II subsurface investigations in conformance with American Society of Testing and Materials Guide E1903, Standard Guide for Environmental Site Assessments: Phase II Environmental Site Assessment Process. The Phase I and Phase II investigations of our properties have not revealed any environmental liability that we believe would have a material adverse effect on our business, assets or results of operations taken as a whole, nor are we aware of any material environmental liability. It is still possible that our Phase I and Phase II investigations have not revealed all environmental liabilities or that there are material environmental liabilities of which we are unaware. Moreover, future laws, ordinances or regulations may impose material environmental liability and the current environmental condition of our properties may be affected by tenants, by the condition of land or operations in the vicinity of our properties, such as the presence of underground storage tanks, or by third parties unrelated to us. While we believe we are in substantial compliance with applicable federal, state and local laws, ordinances and regulations regarding health and safety and the protection of the environment, we cannot assure you that environmental matters will not rise in the future at properties where no problem is currently known to us.

No Limitation on Amount of Indebtedness We May Incur Which Could Increase the Risk of Default on Our Indebtedness. Our total market capitalization at December 31, 2003 was approximately $2,856,125,000, based on the market closing price of our common stock at December 31, 2003 of $47.65 per share (assuming the conversion of 820,782 operating subsidiary units to common stock) and our debt outstanding of approximately $897,035,000 (exclusive of accounts payable and accrued expenses). At December 31, 2003, our debt to total market capitalization ratio was approximately 31.4% (assuming the conversion of all operating subsidiary units). We currently have a board of directors approved policy of incurring debt only if upon incurrence the debt to total market capitalization ratio would be 50% or less. It should be noted, however, that our organizational documents do not contain any limitation on the amount of indebtedness we may incur. Accordingly, our board of directors could alter or eliminate this policy. If this policy were changed, we could become more highly leveraged, resulting in an increase in debt service that could adversely affect our cash flow and, consequently, reduce the amount available for distribution to stockholders. This could also increase the risk of default on our indebtedness.

Certain Types of Losses May Exceed Insurance Coverage. We carry comprehensive liability, public area liability, fire, earthquake, flood, boiler and machinery, extended coverage and rental loss insurance covering our properties, with policy specifications and insured limits that we believe are adequate and appropriate under the circumstances. There are, however, certain types of losses that are not generally insured because it is not economically feasible to insure against these losses. If an uninsured loss or a loss exceeding insured limits occurs, we could lose our capital invested in the property, as well as the anticipated future revenue from the property. In the case of debt which is with recourse to us, we would remain obligated for any mortgage debt or other financial obligations related to the property. In these circumstances, any loss would adversely affect us.

11

Table of Contents

We May be Subject to Tax Upon Disposition of Properties with Built-In Gain. In connection with our formation in 1997, certain entities taxable as “C” corporations were merged either into us or into our subsidiaries which qualified as “qualified REIT subsidiaries”. Certain of these entities held 13 properties with “built-in gain” at the time the entities were merged into us or into our subsidiaries. During 2002, Oregon Real Estate Services, Inc., a “C” corporation, was merged into us. At the time Oregon Real Estate Services, Inc. was merged into us, it held 10 properties and land with “built-in gain”. A property has “built-in gain” if (i) on the day it was acquired, the former owner’s tax basis in the property was less than the property’s fair market value, and (ii) it was acquired in a transaction in which our tax basis in the property was determined by reference to the former owner’s tax basis in the property. Under the applicable Treasury Regulations, if these properties are sold within 10 years of the date we acquired them, we may be required to pay taxes on the built-in gain that would have been realized if the merging “C” corporation had liquidated on the day before the date of the merger. Therefore, we may have less flexibility in determining whether or not to dispose of these properties. If we desire to dispose of these properties at some future date within the 10 year periods, we may be subject to tax on the built-in gain.

Future Acts of Terrorism or War or Risk of War May Have a Negative Impact on Our Business. The continued threat of terrorism and the potential for military action and heightened security measures in response to this threat may cause significant disruption to commerce. There can be no assurance that the armed hostilities will not escalate or that these terrorist attacks, or the United States’ responses to them, will not lead to further acts of terrorism and civil disturbances, which may further contribute to economic instability. Any armed conflict, civil unrest or additional terrorist activities, and the attendant political instability and societal disruption, may adversely affect our results of operations, financial condition, the ability to raise capital or our future growth.

Ownership of Partnership Interest Could Jeopardize Our Status as a REIT. We have direct or indirect control of certain partnerships in which we are a partner and intend to continue to operate them in a manner consistent with the requirements for qualification as a real estate investment trust. If a partnership in which we own an interest takes or expects to take actions which could jeopardize our status as a REIT or require us to pay tax, we may be forced to dispose of our interest in that entity. In addition, it is possible that a partnership could take an action which could cause us to fail a REIT income or asset test, and that we would not become aware of such action in a time frame which would allow us to dispose of our interest in the partnership or take other corrective action on a timely basis. In such a case, we could fail to qualify as a REIT.

General

As of December 31, 2003, we owned and operated 130 neighborhood and community shopping centers containing 20.8 million square feet of which 18.4 million square feet is owned by us with the balance owned by certain retailers. These properties are primarily situated in five key Western U.S. markets including Northern California, Southern California, Oregon, Washington and Nevada, each of which we believe has attractive economic and demographic characteristics. The largest concentration of properties, consisting of 30% of our owned gross leasable area, is located in Southern California. Another 28% of our owned gross leasable area is located in Northern California, 17% in Oregon, 11% in Nevada and 10% in Washington. In addition, properties consisting of the remaining 4% of our owned gross leasable area are located in Arizona, New Mexico, Tennessee and Kentucky. As of December 31, 2003, 95.4% of our total owned gross leasable area was leased by tenants under 3,199 leases.

These properties are regionally managed under active central control by our executive officers. Property management, leasing, capital expenditures, construction and acquisition decisions are centrally administered at our corporate office. We also employ property managers at each of our regional offices to oversee and direct the day-to-day operations of these properties, as well as on-site personnel. Property managers communicate daily with our corporate offices to implement our policies and procedures.

As a result of our in-house leasing program, these properties benefit from a diversified merchandising mix. At December 31, 2003, 61% of the total owned and occupied gross leasable area was leased to national tenants, 18% leased to regional tenants and 21% to local tenants. To promote stability and attract non-anchor tenants, we generally enter into long-term leases (typically 15 to 20 years) with major or anchor tenants, those with 15,000 square feet or more, which usually contain provisions permitting tenants to renew their leases at rates which often include fixed rent increases or consumer price index adjustments from the prior base rent. At December 31, 2003, anchor tenants leased 57% of the total owned gross leasable area, with 71% of anchor-leased gross leasable area (41% of the total owned gross leasable area) scheduled to expire within the next 10 years. To take advantage of improving market conditions and changing retail trends, we generally enter into shorter term leases (typically three to five years) with non-anchor tenants. Our leases are generally on a triple-net basis, which require the tenants to pay their pro rata share of all real property taxes, insurance and property operating expenses.

12

Table of Contents

The following tables provide information about our properties, our tenants and lease expirations.

13

Table of Contents

Property Summary

12/31/2003

14

Table of Contents

Property Summary

12/31/2003

15

Table of Contents

Property Summary

12/31/2003

16

Table of Contents

Property Summary

12/31/2003

17

Table of Contents

Property Summary

12/31/2003

18

Table of Contents

Property Summary

12/31/2003

19

Table of Contents

Property Summary

12/31/2003

20

Table of Contents

Property Summary

12/31/2003