Back to GetFilings.com

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

Form 10-K

(Fee Required)

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003

(No Fee Required)

For the transition period from              to             

Commission File No. 000-49789

HENRY COUNTY BANCSHARES, INC.

(Name of Issuer as Specified in Its Charter)

(770) 474-7293

Issuer’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None.

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

COMMON STOCK, $2.50 PAR VALUE

(Title of Class)

Check whether the issuer (1) filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the past 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for past 90 days.    Yes  x    No  ¨

Check if there is no disclosure of delinquent filers in response to Item 405 of Regulation S-K in this form, and no disclosure will be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.    x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 126-2 of the Act)    Yes  x    No  ¨

State the aggregate market value of the voting stock held by nonaffiliates computed by reference to the price at which the stock was sold, or the average bid and asked prices of such stock, as of June 30, 2003: $102,636,990 (based on the stock price of $16.50 as of that date).

State the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common equity, as of the latest practicable date:

7,160,992 shares of $2.50 par value common stock as of February 8, 2004.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

Portions of the information required by Part III of this Annual Report are incorporated by reference from the Registrant’s definitive Proxy Statement to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Regulation 14A not later than 120 days after the end of the fiscal year covered by this Annual Report.

Part I

Henry County Bancshares, Inc. (the “Company”), headquartered in Stockbridge, Georgia, is a Georgia business corporation which operates as a bank holding company. The Company was incorporated on June 22, 1982 for the purpose of reorganizing The First State Bank (the “Bank”) to operate within a holding company structure. The Bank is a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company.

The Company’s principal activities consist of owning and supervising the Bank, which engages in a full service commercial and consumer banking business, as well as a variety of deposit services provided to its customers. The Company also conducts mortgage lending operations through its wholly owned subsidiary, First Metro Mortgage Co., which provides the Company’s customers with a wide range of mortgage banking services and products.

The Company, through the Bank and First Metro Mortgage Co., derives substantially all of its income from the furnishing of banking and banking related services.

The Company directs the policies and coordinates the financial resources of the Bank and of First Metro Mortgage Co. The Company provides and performs various technical and advisory services for its subsidiaries, coordinates their general policies and activities, and participates in their major decisions.

The First State Bank

The Bank was chartered by the Georgia Department of Banking and Finance in 1964. The Bank operates through its main office at 4806 North Henry Boulevard, Stockbridge, Georgia, as well as five (5) full service branches located at Hudson Bridge Road in Stockbridge, East Atlanta Road in Ellenwood, John Frank Ward Boulevard in McDonough, Bill Gardner Parkway in Locust Grove and at Highway 155 in McDonough. The Bank owns two lots for the construction of future branches in Henry County at the intersection of Chambers Road and Jonesboro Road as well as Highway 81 in McDonough. The Bank owns an additional parcel of real estate adjacent to its main office location in Stockbridge, Georgia, upon which is situated a small house leased to an unaffiliated insurance company.

The Bank engages in a full service commercial and consumer banking business in its primary market area of Henry County and surrounding counties, as well as a variety of deposit services provided to its customers. The Bank offers on-line banking services to its customers. Checking, savings, money market accounts and other time deposits are the primary sources of the Bank’s funds for loans and investments. The Bank offers a full complement of lending activities, including commercial, consumer installment, real estate, home equity and second mortgage loans, with particular emphasis on short and medium term obligations. Commercial lending activities are

–2–

directed principally to businesses whose demands for funds fall within the Bank’s lending limits. Consumer lending is oriented primarily to the needs of the Bank’s customers. Real estate loans include short term acquisition and construction loans. The Bank focuses primarily on residential and commercial construction loans, commercial loans secured by machinery and equipment with a developed resale market, working capital loans on a secured short term basis to established businesses in the primary service area, home equity loans of up to 80% of the current market value of the underlying real estate, residential real estate loans of up to 90% of value with adjustable rates or balloon payments due within five (5) years, and loans secured by savings accounts, other time accounts, cash value of life insurance, readily marketable stocks and bonds, or general use machinery and equipment for which a resale market has developed. The Bank makes both secured and unsecured loans to persons and entities which meet criteria established by the Bank and the executive committee. Approximately 75% of the Bank’s loan portfolio is concentrated in loans secured by real estate, most of which is located in the Bank’s primary market area. The Bank, as a matter of policy, does not generally extend credit to any single borrower or group of related borrowers in excess of 25% of statutory capital, or approximately $8,000,000. The lending policies and procedures of the Bank are periodically reviewed and modified by the Board of Directors of the Bank in order to ensure risks are acceptable and to protect the Bank’s financial position in the market. Among other services offered are drive-up windows, night deposits, safe deposits, traveler’s checks, credit cards, cashier’s checks, notary public and other customary bank services. The Bank does not offer trust services.

The Bank maintains correspondent relationships with Wachovia Bank, Bank of America, The Bankers Bank, SunTrust Bank, Federal Home Loan Bank, and the Federal Reserve of Atlanta. These banks provide certain services to the Bank such as investing excess funds, wire transfer of funds, safekeeping of investment securities, loan participation and investment advice.

The banking business in and around Henry County, Georgia is highly competitive which includes certain major banks which have acquired formerly locally owned institutions. These banks have considerably greater resources and lending limits than the Bank. In addition to commercial banks and savings banks, the Bank competes with other financial institutions, such as credit unions, agricultural credit associations, and investment firms which provide services similar to checking accounts and commercial lending. The Bank competes with numerous institutions within the primary service areas, including local branches of Bank of America, SunTrust Bank, Wachovia, BB&T and South Trust Bank. As of December 31, 2003 the Bank held approximately 37% of the deposit accounts in the Henry County area. Neither the Company nor the Bank generates a material amount of revenue from foreign countries, nor does either have material long-lived assets, customer relationships, mortgages or servicing rights, deferred policy acquisition costs, or deferred tax assets in foreign countries. Thus, the Company has no significant risks attributable to foreign operations.

The Bank relies substantially on personal conduct of its officers, directors and shareholders, as well as a broad product line, competitive services, and an aggressive local advertising campaign and promotional activities to attract business and to acquaint potential customers with the Bank’s personal services. The Bank’s marketing approach emphasizes the advantages of dealing with an independent, locally owned and headquartered commercial bank attuned to the particular needs of small to medium size businesses, professionals and individuals in the community.

–3–

As of February 8, 2004 the Bank had 131 full time employees and 21 part time employees. None of the Bank’s employees are represented by a collective bargaining group. The Bank considers its relationships with its employees to be good.

A history of the Bank’s financial position for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2001, 2002 and 2003, is as follows:

First Metro Mortgage Co.

First Metro Mortgage Co. was formed in 1985 to provide mortgage loan origination services in the same primary market area as the Bank. Its offices are located at the Bank’s branch facility on Hudson Bridge Road in Stockbridge, Georgia. First Metro Mortgage Co. initiates long term mortgage loans but immediately sells those loans in the secondary market to investors pursuant to agreements between the investors and the company prior to funding. All loans are sold without recourse, and the Bank does not retain servicing rights or obligations with respect to those loans. First Metro Mortgage Co. realized net income of $317,435 for the 2003 fiscal year, $108,468 in the 2002 fiscal year, and $213,126 in 2001. In 2003, First Metro Mortgage Co. was merged into and became a subsidiary of The First State Bank, effective July 1, 2003.

–4–

SUPERVISION AND REGULATION

Bank Holding Company Regulations - Henry County Bancshares, Inc.

The Company is a registered holding company under the federal Bank Holding Company Act and the Georgia Bank Holding Company Act and is regulated under such act by the Board of Governors of Federal Reserve System (the “Federal Reserve”) and by the Georgia Department of Banking and Finance (the “Georgia Department”), respectively.

Reporting and Examination.

As a bank holding company, the Company is required to file annual reports with the Federal Reserve and the Georgia Department and provide such additional information as the applicable regulator may require pursuant to the federal and Georgia Bank Holding Company Acts. The Federal Reserve and the Georgia Department may also conduct examinations of the Company to determine whether the Company is in compliance with Bank Holding Company Acts and regulations promulgated thereunder.

Acquisitions.

The Federal Bank Holding Company Act requires every bank holding company to obtain the prior approval of the Federal Reserve before: (1) acquiring direct or indirect ownership or control of more than 5% of the voting shares of any bank; (2) acquiring all or substantially all of the assets of a bank; and (3) before merging or consolidating with another bank holding company. A bank holding company is also generally prohibited from engaging in, or acquiring, direct or indirect control of more than five percent (5%) of the voting shares of any company engaged in non-banking activities, unless the Federal Reserve has found those activities to be so closely related to banking or managing or controlling banks as to be a proper incident thereto. Some of the activities that the Federal Reserve has determined by regulation to be proper incidents to the business of a bank holding company including making or servicing loans and certain types of leases, engaging in certain insurance and discount brokerage activities, performing certain data processing services, acting in certain circumstances as a fiduciary or investment or financial advisor, owning savings associations, and making investments in certain corporations for projects designed primarily to promote community welfare.

The Georgia Department requires similar approval prior to the acquisition of any additional banks. A Georgia bank holding company is generally prohibited from acquiring ownership or control of 5% or more of the voting shares of a bank unless the bank being acquired is either a bank for purposes of the Federal Bank Holding Company Act, or a federal or state savings and loan association or savings bank or federal savings bank whose deposits are insured by the Federal Savings and Loan Insurance Corporation and such bank has been in existence and continuously operating as a bank for a period of five years or more prior to the date of application to the Department for approval of such acquisition.

–5–

Source of Strength to Subsidiary Banks.

The Federal Reserve (pursuant to regulation and published statements) has maintained that a bank holding company must serve as a source of financial strength to its subsidiary banks. In adhering to the Federal Reserve policy, the Company may be required to provide financial support to its subsidiary banks at a time when, absent such Federal Reserve policy, the Company may not deem it advisable to provide such assistance. Similarly, the Federal Reserve also monitors the financial performance and prospects of non-bank subsidiaries with an inspection process to ascertain whether such non-banking subsidiaries enhance or detract from the Company’s ability to serve as a source of strength for its subsidiary banks.

Capital Requirements.

The holding company is subject to regulatory capital requirements imposed by the Federal Reserve applied on a consolidated basis with banks owned by the holding company. Bank holding companies must have capital (as defined in the rules) equal to eight (8) percent of risk-weighted assets. The risk weights assigned to assets are based primarily on credit risk. For example, securities with an unconditional guarantee by the United States government are assigned the least risk category. A risk weight of 50% is assigned to loans secured by owner-occupied one-to-four family residential mortgages. The aggregate amount of assets assigned to each risk category is multiplied by the risk weight assigned to that category to determine the weighted values, which are added together to determine total risk-weighted assets.

The Federal Reserve also requires the maintenance of minimum capital leverage ratios to be used in tandem with the risk-based guidelines in assessing the overall capital adequacy of bank holding companies. The guidelines define capital as either Tier 1 (primarily shareholder equity) or Tier 2 (certain debt instruments and a portion of the allowance for loan losses). Tier 1 capital for banking organizations includes common equity, minority interests in the equity accounts of consolidated subsidiaries, qualifying noncumulative perpetual preferred stock and qualifying cumulative perpetual preferred stock. (Cumulative perpetual preferred stock is limited to 25 percent of Tier 1 capital.) Tier 1 capital excludes goodwill; amounts of mortgage servicing assets, nonmortgage servicing assets, and purchased credit card relationships that, in the aggregate, exceed 100 percent of Tier 1 capital; nonmortgage servicing assets and purchased credit card relationships that in the aggregate, exceed 25 percent of Tier 1 capital; all other identifiable intangible assets; and deferred tax assets that are dependent upon future taxable income, net of their valuation allowance, in excess of certain limitations.

Effective June 30, 1998, the Federal Reserve has established a minimum ratio of Tier 1 capital to total assets of 3.0 percent for strong bank holding companies (rated composite “1” under the BOPEC rating system of bank holding companies), and for bank holding companies that have implemented the Board’s risk-based capital measure for market risk. For all other bank holding companies, the minimum ratio of Tier 1 capital to total assets is 4.0 percent. Banking organizations with supervisory, financial, operational, or managerial weaknesses, as well as organizations that are

–6–

anticipating or experiencing significant growth, are expected to maintain capital ratios well above the minimum levels. Higher capital ratios may be required for any bank holding company if warranted by its particular circumstances or risk profile. Bank holding companies are required to hold capital commensurate with the level and nature of the risks, including the volume and severity of problem loans, to which they are exposed.

As of December 31, 2003 the Company maintained Tier 1 and Total Risk-Based Capital Ratios of 11.57% and 12.51% respectively. A more detailed analysis of the Company’s capital and comparison to regulatory requirements is included in Note 12 in the audited financial statements included herein.

The Riegle-Neal Interstate Banking and Branching Efficiency Act.

Prior to the enactment of the Interstate Banking and Branching Efficiency Act of 1994 (the “Riegle-Neal Act”), interstate expansion of bank holding companies was prohibited, unless such acquisition was specifically authorized by a statute of the state in which the target bank was located. Pursuant to the Riegle-Neal Act, effective September 29, 1995 an adequately capitalized and adequately managed holding company may acquire a bank across state lines, without regard to whether such acquisition is permissible under state law. A bank holding company is considered to be “adequately capitalized” if it meets all applicable federal regulatory capital standards.

While the Riegle-Neal Act precludes a state from entirely insulating its banks from acquisition by an out-of-state holding company, a state may still provide that a bank may not be acquired by an out-of-state company unless the bank has been in existence for a specified number of years, not to exceed five years. Additionally, the Federal Reserve is directed not to approve an application for the acquisition of a bank across state lines if: (i) the applicant bank holding company, including all affiliated insured depository institutions, controls or after the acquisition would control, more than ten (10) percent of the total amount of deposits of all insured depository institutions in the United States (the “ten percent concentration limit”) or (ii) the acquisition would result in the holding company controlling thirty (30) percent or more of the total deposits of insured depository institutions in any state in which the holding company controlled a bank or branch immediately prior to the acquisition (the “thirty percent concentration limit”). States may waive the thirty percent concentration limit, or may make the limits more or less restrictive, so long as they do no discriminate against out-of-state bank holding companies.

The Riegle-Neal Act also provides that, beginning on June 1, 1997, banks located in different states may merge and operate the resulting institution as a bank with interstate branches. However, a state may (i) prevent interstate branching through mergers by passing a law prior to June 1, 1997 that expressly prohibits mergers involving out-of-state banks, or (ii) permit such merger transactions prior to June 1, 1997. Under the Riegle-Neal Act, an interstate merger transaction may involve the acquisition of a branch of an insured bank without the acquisition of the bank itself, but only if the law of the state in which the branch is located permits this type of transaction.

–7–

Under the Riegle-Neal Act, a state may impose certain conditions on a branch of an out-of-state bank resulting from an interstate merger so long as such conditions do not have the effect of discriminating against out-of-state banks or bank holding companies, other than on the basis of a requirement of nationwide reciprocal treatment. The ten (10) percent concentration limit and the thirty (30) percent concentration limit described above, as well as the rights of the states to modify or waive the thirty (30) percent concentration limit, apply to interstate bank mergers in the same manner as they apply to the acquisition of out-of-state banks.

A bank resulting from an interstate merger transaction may retain and operate any office that any bank involved in the transaction was operating immediately before the transaction. After completion of the transaction, the resulting bank may establish or acquire additional branches at any location where any bank involved in the transaction could have established or acquired a branch. The Riegle-Neal Act also provides that the appropriate federal banking agency may approve an application by a bank to establish and operate an interstate branch in any state that has in effect a law that expressly permits all out-of-state banks to establish and operate such a branch.

In response to the Riegle-Neal Act, effective June 1, 1997, Georgia permitted interstate branching, although only through merger and acquisition. In addition, Georgia law provides that a bank may not be acquired by an out-of-state company unless the bank has been in existence for five years. Georgia has also adopted the thirty percent concentration limit, but permits state regulators to waive it on a case-by-case basis.

The Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act of 1999.

The Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (the “GLB Act”) dramatically increases the ability of eligible banking organizations to affiliate with insurance, securities, and other financial firms and insured depository institutions. The GLB Act permits eligible banking organizations to engage in activities and to affiliate with nonbank firms engaged in activities that are financial in nature or incidental to such financial activities, and also includes some additional activities that are complementary to such financial activities.

The definition of activities that are financial in nature or that are incidental to such financial activities is handled by the GLB Act in two ways. First, there is a laundry list of activities that are designated as financial in nature. Second, the authorization of new activities as financial in nature or incidental to a financial activity requires a consultative process between the Federal Reserve Board and the Secretary of the Treasury with each having the authority to veto proposals of the other. The Federal Reserve Board has the discretion to determine what activities are complementary to financial activities.

The precise scope of the authority to engage in these new financial activities, however, depends on the type of banking organization, whether it is a holding company, a subsidiary of a bank, or a bank. The GLB Act repealed two sections of the Glass-Stegall Act, Sections 20 and 32, which restricted affiliations between securities firms and banks. The GLB Act authorizes two types of

–8–

banking organizations to engage in expanded securities activities. The GLB Act authorizes a new type of bank holding company called a financial holding company to have a subsidiary company that engages in securities underwriting and dealing without limitation as to the types of securities involved. The GLB Act also permits a bank to control a financial subsidiary that can engage in many of the expanded securities activities permitted for financial holding companies. However, additional restrictions apply to bank financial subsidiaries.

Since the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, and its subsequent amendments, federal law has limited the types of activities that are permitted for a bank holding company, and it is has also limited the types of companies that a bank holding company can control. The GLB Act retains the bank holding company regulatory framework, but adds a new provision that authorizes enlarged authority for the new financial holding company form of organization to engage in any activity of a financial nature or incidental thereto. A new Section 4(k) of the Bank Holding Company Act provides that a financial holding company may engage in any activity, and may acquire and retain shares of any company engaged in any activity, that the Federal Reserve Board in coordination with the Secretary of the Treasury determines by regulation or order to be financial in nature or incidental to such financial activities, or is complementary to financial activities.

The GLB Act also amends the Bank Holding Company Act to prescribe eligibility criteria for financial holding companies, defines the scope of activities permitted for bank holding companies that do not become financial holding companies, and establishes consequences for financial holding companies that cease to maintain the status needed to qualify as a financial holding company.

There are three special criteria to qualify for the enlarged activities and affiliation. First, all the depository institutions in the bank holding company organization must be well-capitalized. Second, all of the depository institutions of the bank holding company must be well managed. Third, the bank holding company must have filed a declaration of intent with the Federal Reserve Board stating that it intends to exercise the expanded authority under the GLB Act and certify to the Federal Reserve Board that the bank holding company’s depository institutions meet the well-capitalized and well managed criteria. The GLB Act also requires the bank to achieve a rating of satisfactory or better in meeting community credit needs at the most recent examination of such institution under the Community Reinvestment Act.

Once a bank holding company has filed a declaration of its intent to be a financial holding company, as long as there is no action by the Federal Reserve Board giving notice that it is not eligible, the company may proceed to engage in the activities and enter into the affiliations under the large authority conferred by the GLB Act’s amendments to the Bank Holding Company Act. The holding company does not need prior approval from the Federal Reserve Board to engage in activities that the GLB Act identifies as financial in nature or that the Federal Reserve Board has determined to be financial in nature or incidental thereto by order or regulation.

The GLB Act retains the basic structure of the Bank Holding Company Act. Thus, a bank holding company that is not eligible for the expanded powers of a financial holding company is now

–9–

subject to the amended Section 4(c)(8) of the Bank Holding Company Act which freezes the activities that are authorized and defined as closely related to banking activities. Under this Section, a bank holding company is not eligible for the expanded activities permitted under new Section 4(k) and is limited to those specific activities previously approved by the Federal Reserve Board.

The GLB Act also addresses the consequences when a financial holding company that has exercised the expanded authority fails to maintain its eligibility to be a financial holding company. The Federal Reserve Board may impose such limitations on the conduct or activities of a noncompliant financial holding company or any affiliate of that company as the Board determines to be appropriate under the circumstances and consistent with the purposes of the Act.

The GLB Act is essentially a dramatic liberalization of the restrictions placed on banks, especially bank holding companies, regarding the areas of financial businesses in which they are allowed to compete.

Regulation of Subsidiary Banks.

As a state-chartered bank, The First State Bank is examined and regulated by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) and the Georgia Department. The major functions of the FDIC with respect to insured banks include paying depositors to the extent provided by law in the event an insured bank is closed without adequately providing for payment of the claim of depositors, acting as a receiver of state banks placed in receivership when so appointed by state authorities, and preventing the continuance or development of unsound and unsafe banking practices. In addition, the FDIC also approves conversions, mergers, consolidations, and assumption of deposit liability transactions between insured banks and noninsured banks or institutions to prevent capital or surplus diminution in such transactions where the resulting, continued or assumed bank is an insured nonmember state bank.

Subsidiary banks of a bank holding company are subject to certain restrictions imposed by the federal Bank Holding Company Act on any extension of credit to the bank holding company or any of its subsidiaries, on investment in the stock or other securities thereof and on the taking of such stock or securities as collateral for loans to any borrower. In addition, a bank holding company and its subsidiaries are prohibited from engaging in certain tie-in-arrangements in connection with any extension of credit or provision of any property or services.

The Georgia Department regulates all areas of the bank’s banking operations, including mergers, establishment of branches, loans, interest rates, and reserves. The Bank must have the approval of the Commissioner to pay cash dividends, unless at the time of such payment:

a. the total classified assets at the most recent examination of such bank do not exceed 80% of Tier 1 capital plus Allowance for Loan Losses as reflected at such examination;

–10–

b. the aggregate amount of dividends declared or anticipated to be declared in the calendar year does not exceed 50% of the net profits, after taxes but before dividends, for the pervious calendar year; and

c. the ratio of Tier 1 Capital to Adjusted Total Assets shall not be less than six (6) percent.

State chartered banks are also subject to State of Georgia banking and usury laws restricting the amount of interest which it may charge in making loans or other extensions of credit.

Expansion through Branching, Merger or Consolidation.

With respect to expansion, the banks were previously prohibited from establishing branch offices or facilities outside of the county in which their main office was located, except:

In addition, in the case of a merger or consolidation, the acquiring bank must have been in existence for at least 24 months prior to the merger. However, effective July 1, 1998, Georgia law permits, with required regulatory approval, the establishment of de novo branches in an unlimited number of counties within the State of Georgia by the subsidiary bank(s) of bank holding companies then engaged in the banking business in the State of Georgia. This law may result in increased competition in the market area of the Company’s subsidiary banks.

–11–

Capital Requirements.

The FDIC adopted risk-based capital guidelines that went into effect on December 31, 1990 for all FDIC insured state chartered banks that are not members of the Federal Reserve System. Beginning December 31, 1992, all banks were required to maintain a minimum ratio of total capital to risk weighted assets of eight (8) percent of which at least four (4) percent must consist of Tier 1 capital. Tier 1 capital of state chartered banks (as defined by the regulation) generally consists of: (i) common stockholders equity; (ii) qualifying noncumulative perpetual preferred stock and related surplus; and (iii) minority interests in the equity accounts of consolidated subsidiaries. In addition, the FDIC adopted a minimum ratio of Tier 1 capital to total assets of banks, referred to as the leverage capital ratio of three (3) percent if the FDIC determines that the institution is not anticipating or experiencing significant growth and has well-diversified risk, including no undue interest rate exposure, excellent asset quality, high liquidity, good earnings and, in general is considered a strong banking organization, rated Composite “1” under the Uniform Financial Institutions Rating System (the CAMEL rating system) established by the Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council. All other financial institutions are required to maintain leverage ratio of four (4) percent.

Effective October 1, 1998, the FDIC amended its risk-based and leverage capital rules as follows: (1) all servicing assets and purchase credit card relationships (“PCCRs”) that are included in capital are each subject to a ninety percent (90%) of fair value limitation (also known as a “ten percent (10%) haircut”); (2) the aggregate amount of all servicing assets and PCCRs included in capital cannot exceed 100% of Tier I capital; (3) the aggregate amount of nonmortgage servicing assets (“NMSAs”) and PCCRS included in capital cannot exceed 25% of Tier 1 capital; and (4) all other intangible assets (other than qualifying PCCRS) must be deducted from Tier 1 capital.

Amounts of servicing assets and PCCRs in excess of the amounts allowable must be deducted in determining Tier 1 capital. Interest-only Strips receivable, whether or not in security form, are not subject to any regulatory capital limitation under the amended rule.

FDIC Insurance Assessments.

The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Improvement Act of 1991 (“FDICIA”), enacted in December, 1991, provided for a number of reforms relating to the safety and soundness of the deposit insurance system, supervision of domestic and foreign depository institutions and improvement of accounting standards. One aspect of the act is the requirement that banks will have to meet certain safety and soundness standards. In order to comply with the act, the Federal Reserve and the FDIC implemented regulations defining operational and managerial standards relating to internal controls, loan documentation, credit underwriting, interest rate exposure, asset growth, director and officer compensation, fees and benefits, asset quality, earnings and stock valuation.

The regulations provide for a risk based premium system which requires higher assessment rates for banks which the FDIC determines pose greater risks to the Bank Insurance Fund (“BIF”). Under the regulations, banks pay an assessment depending upon risk classification.

–12–

To arrive at risk-based assessments, the FDIC places each bank in one of nine risk categories using a two step process based on capital ratios and on other relevant information. Each bank is assigned to one of three groups: (i) well capitalized, (ii) adequately capitalized, or (iii) under capitalized, based on its capital ratios. The FDIC also assigns each bank to one of three subgroups based upon an evaluation of the risk posed by the bank. The three subgroups include (i) banks that are financially sound with only a few minor weaknesses, (ii) banks with weaknesses which, if not corrected, could result in significant deterioration of the bank and increased risk to the BIF, and (iii) those banks that pose a substantial probability of loss to the BIF unless corrective action is taken. FDICIA imposes progressively more restrictive constraints on operations management and capital distributions depending on the category in which an institution is classified. As of December 31, 2003, The First State Bank met the definition of a well-capitalized institution.

Under FDICIA insurance of deposits may be terminated by the FDIC upon a finding that the institution has engaged in unsafe and unsound practices, is in an unsafe or unsound condition to continue operations, or has violated any applicable law, regulation, rule, order or condition imposed by the FDIC.

Community Reinvestment Act.

The Company and the Bank are subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act of 1977, as amended (the “CRA”) and the federal banking agencies’ regulations issued thereunder. Under the CRA, all banks and thrifts have a continuing and affirmative obligation, consistent with its safe and sound operation to help meet the credit needs for their entire communities, including low- and moderate-income neighborhoods. The CRA does not establish specific lending requirements or programs for financial institutions, nor does it limit an institution’s discretion to develop the types of products and services that it believes are best suited to its particular community, consistent with the CRA.

The CRA requires a depository institution’s primary federal regulator, in connection with its examination of the institution, to assess the institution’s record of assessing and meeting the credit needs of the community served by that institution, including low- and moderate-income neighborhoods. The regulatory agency’s assessment of the institution’s record is made available to the public. In the case of a bank holding company applying for approval to acquire a bank or other bank holding company, the Federal Reserve will assess the records of each subsidiary depository institution of the applicant bank holding company, and such records may be the basis for denying the application.

The evaluation system used to judge an institution’s CRA performance consists of three tests: (1) a lending test; (2) an investment test; and (3) a service test. Each of these tests will be applied by the institution’s primary federal regulator taking into account such factors as: (i) demographic data about the community; (ii) the institution’s capacity and constraints; (iii) the institution’s product offerings and business strategy; and (iv) data on the prior performance of the institution and similarly-situated lenders.

–13–

In addition, a financial institution will have the option of having its CRA performance evaluated based on a strategic plan of up to five years in length that it had developed in cooperation with local community groups. In order to be rated under a strategic plan, the institution will be required to obtain the prior approval of its federal regulator.

The interagency CRA regulations provide that an institution evaluated under a given test will receive one of five ratings for the test: (1) outstanding; (2) high satisfactory; (3) low satisfactory; (4) needs to improve; and (5) substantial noncompliance. An institution will receive a certain number of points for its rating on each test, and the points are combined to produce an overall composite rating. Evidence of discriminatory or other illegal credit practices would adversely affect an institution’s overall rating. The First State Bank received a satisfactory rating as a result of its most recent CRA examination.

The assets of the Company consist almost entirely of its equity ownership in The First State Bank and First Metro Mortgage Co. The assets of First Metro Mortgage Co. consist almost entirely of loans originated and the proceeds of those loans when sold to investors. The assets of the Bank consist primarily of loans and investment securities. However, it also owns the real estate and improvements thereon from which it conducts its banking operations. Those locations are more particularly described as follows:

4806 N. Henry Boulevard, Stockbridge, Georgia - This location houses the Bank’s main office, a two-story building containing 20,800 square feet constructed in 1965. It is a full service bank facility equipped with an ATM machine and four lane drive-up service.

4800 N. Henry Boulevard, Stockbridge, Georgia - This location houses the operations center for the Bank. It is a single story building constructed in 1999, consisting of 20,622 square feet.

295 Fairview Road, Ellenwood, Georgia - This is a full service banking location with ATM and drive-thru service. It is a single story building containing 3,520 square feet.

114 John Frank Ward Boulevard, McDonough, Georgia - This site contains a 4,000 square foot single story building with ATM and drive-thru service.

1810 Hudson Bridge Road, Stockbridge, Georgia - This location contains a two-story facility consisting of 4,787 square feet. The lower floor contains a full service banking location, with ATM and drive-thru service. The upper floor houses the operations of First Metro Mortgage Co.

4979 Bill Gardner Parkway, Locust Grove, Georgia - This location contains a one-story building consisting of 4,000 square feet, with ATM and drive-thru service.

–14–

2316 Highway 155, McDonough, Georgia - This full service banking location is a single-story facility consisting of approximately 5,500 square feet with ATM and drive-thru service.

The Bank also owns two additional parcels of land located in Henry County at the intersection of Chambers Road and Jonesboro Road and at Highway 81 in McDonough. The Bank divested of a one-acre tract of land during 2003 that was adjacent to our branch located in McDonough at Highway 155.

The Bank conducts its own data processing and owns the equipment used for that purpose. The Bank also owns the furniture, fixtures and equipment located on its premises and several automobiles.

The Bank is involved in various legal actions from normal business activities. Management believes that the liability, if any, arising from such actions will not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial statements. Neither the Bank nor the Company is a party to any proceeding to which any director, officer or affiliate of the issuer, or any owner of more than five percent (5%) of its voting stock is a party adverse to the Bank or the Company.

No matters were submitted to a vote of security holders during the fourth quarter of the fiscal year covered by this report.

–15–

Part II

General

There is no established public trading market for the Company’s common stock. It is not traded on an exchange or in the over-the-counter market. There is no assurance that an active market will develop for the Company’s common stock in the future. Therefore, management of the Company is furnished with only limited information concerning trades of the Company’s common stock. The following table sets forth for each quarter during the most two recent fiscal years the number of shares traded and the high and low per share sales price to the extent known to management. In 2003, the Company purchased no shares of treasury stock.

The Company has historically paid dividends on an annual basis. Any declaration and payment of dividends will be based on the Company’s earnings, economic conditions, and the evaluation by the Board of Directors of other relevant factors. The Company’s ability to pay dividends is dependent on cash dividends paid to it by the Bank and by First Metro Mortgage Co.

–16–

The ability of the Bank to pay dividends to the Company is restricted by applicable regulatory requirements. The following table sets forth cash dividends which have been declared and paid by the Company since January 1, 2001 (adjusted for the stock dividend declared and paid by the Company in 2001):

As of February 8, 2004, 7,160,992 shares of common stock were outstanding held of record by approximately 554 persons (not including the number of persons or entities holding stock in nominee or street name through various brokerage houses).

–17–

The holders of the Company’s common stock are entitled to receive dividends when, as and if declared by the Board of Directors out of funds legally available. Funds for the payment of dividends of the Company are primarily obtained from dividends paid by the Bank.

There are no shares of the Company’s common stock that are subject to outstanding options or warrants to purchase, or that are convertible into, common equity of the Company, and there were no sales of unregistered securities of the Company in 2003.

–18–

The following table presents selected historical consolidated financial information for us and our subsidiaries and is derived from the consolidated financial statements and related notes included in this annual report. This information is only a summary and should be read in conjunction with our historical financial statements and related notes.

–19–

QUARTERLY DATA

The following is a discussion of our financial condition and the financial condition of our bank subsidiary, The First State Bank and our mortgage subsidiary, First Metro Mortgage Co. at December 31, 2003 and 2002 and the results of operations for the three years in the period ended December 31, 2003. The purpose of this discussion is to focus on information about our financial condition and results of operations that are not otherwise apparent from our audited financial statements. Reference should be made to those statements and the selected financial data presented elsewhere in this report for an understanding of the following discussion and analysis.

A Warning About Forward-Looking Statements

We may from time to time make written or oral forward-looking statements, including statements contained in our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission and reports to stockholders. Statements made by us, other than those concerning historical information, should be considered forward-looking and subject to various risks and uncertainties. Forward-looking statements are made based upon management’s belief as well as assumptions made by, and information currently available to, management pursuant to “safe harbor” provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Our actual results may differ materially from the results anticipated in forward-looking statements due to a variety of factors, including governmental monetary and fiscal policies, deposit levels, loan demand, loan collateral values, securities portfolio values, interest rate risk management, the effects of competition in the banking business from other commercial banks, thrifts,

–20–

mortgage banking firms, consumer finance companies, credit unions, securities brokerage firms, insurance companies, money market funds and other financial institutions operating in our market area and elsewhere, including institutions operating through the Internet, changes in governmental regulation relating to the banking industry, including regulations relating to branching and acquisitions, failure of assumptions underlying the establishment of reserves for loan losses, including the value of collateral underlying delinquent loans and other factors. We caution that these factors are not exclusive. We do not undertake to update any forward-looking statement that may be made from time to time by us, or on our behalf.

Critical Accounting Policies

Our accounting and reporting policies are in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America as defined by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board and conform to general practices within the banking industry. Our significant accounting policies are described in the notes to the consolidated financial statements. Certain accounting policies require management to make significant estimates and assumptions, which have a material impact on the carrying value of certain assets and liabilities, and we consider these to be critical accounting policies. The estimates and assumptions used are based on historical experience and other factors that management believes to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results could differ significantly from these estimates and assumptions, which could have a material impact on the carrying value of assets and liabilities at the balance sheet dates and results of operations for the reporting periods.

We believe the following are critical accounting policies that require the most significant estimates and assumptions that are particularly susceptible to a significant change in the preparation of our financial statements.

Allowance for loan losses

A provision for loan losses is based on management’s opinion of an amount that is adequate to absorb losses inherent in the existing loan portfolio. The allowance for loan losses is established through a provision for loan losses based on management’s evaluation of current economic conditions, volume and composition of the loan portfolio, the fair market value or the estimated net realizable value of underlying collateral, historical charge off experience, the level of nonperforming and past due loans, and other indicators derived from reviewing the loan portfolio. The evaluation includes a review of all loans on which full collection may not be reasonably assumed. Should the factors that are considered in determining the allowance for loan losses change over time, or should management’s estimates prove incorrect, a different amount may be reported for the allowance and the associated provision for loan losses. For example, if economic conditions in our market area experience an unexpected and adverse change, we may need to increase our allowance for loan losses by taking a charge against earnings in the form of an additional provision for loan loss.

Overview

The year 2003 was highlighted by continued loan and core deposit growth as the Henry County area remains one of the fastest growing areas in the country. Our loan portfolio grew in excess of $68 million, while our core deposit growth exceeded $47 million. Our municipal deposits decreased by $40 million, resulting in net deposit growth in excess of $6 million. We continued to remain the market leader as measured by deposits in Henry County, representing 37% market share as of June 30, 2003. We reported net income of $7,735,900 in 2003 as compared to $7,333,838 in 2002 and $7,973,000 in 2001. Lower interest rates continued to have an impact on our net interest margins as evidenced by our net interest margin of 3.57% at year end 2003 as compared to 3.73% at year end 2002.

–21–

Our achievements in growth were a direct result of our commitment to quality customer service as evidenced by our receiving the 2003 Quality Service Award presented by the Community Bankers Association of Georgia. We believe that our continued branch expansion within the Henry County market, as well as our commitment to quality customer service, will allow us to take advantage of this continued growth.

–22–

Financial Condition at December 31, 2003 and 2002

The following is a summary of our balance sheets for the periods indicated:

As of December 31, 2003, we had total assets of $515 million, an increase of 5.31% over December 31, 2002. Total interest-earning assets were $479 million at December 31, 2003 or 93% of total assets as compared to $444 million at December 31, 2002 or 91% of total assets. Our primary interest-earning assets at December 31, 2003 were loans, which made up 87% of total interest-earning assets as compared to 79% at December 31, 2002. Our loan to deposit ratio increased to 98% at December 31, 2003 as compared to 83% at December 31, 2002. Increases of $6.9 million in deposit growth, coupled with increases in other borrowings of $14.5 million and decreases of $22.3 million in federal funds sold were primarily used to fund loan growth of $68 million. Additional funding of the loan portfolio was provided by decreases of $6.4 million in the securities portfolio, coupled with decreases in cash and due from banks of $10.3 million as well as increased shareholders’ equity. The Company made a strategic decision during 2003 to continue restructuring of our balance sheet through shifting of lower earning assets in the form of investment securities into higher yielding loans. The funding component of this change was accomplished through the continued emphasis on raising core deposits as well as using alternative funding sources such as Federal Home Loan Bank Advances and other short term borrowings.

The securities portfolio provides the Company with a source of liquidity and a relatively stable source of income. The Company’s investment policy focuses on the use of the securities portfolio to manage the interest rate risk created by the inherent mismatch of the loan and deposit portfolios. The Company’s asset/liability management committee meets periodically to review economic trends and makes recommendations as to the structure of the securities portfolio based upon this review and the Company’s projected funding needs. Due to the falling interest rate environment occurring in 2002 and continuing throughout 2003, the Company has continued to shorten the duration of the securities portfolio in an effort to take advantage of anticipated rising interest rates.

–23–

Our securities portfolio, consisting of U.S. Government and Agency, mortgage-backed, municipal and equity securities amounted to $58 million at December 31, 2003. Unrealized gains on securities available-for-sale were $429,698 at December 31, 2003 as compared to $881,692 at December 31, 2002. Unrealized gains on securities held-to-maturity were $25,333 at December 31, 2003 as compared to $39,115 at December 31, 2002. We have not specifically identified any securities for sale in future periods, which, if so designated, would require a charge to operations if the market value would not be reasonably expected to recover prior to the time of sale.

Since lending activities generate the primary source of revenue, the Company’s main objective is to adhere to sound lending practices. The Board of Directors has delegated loan policy decisions and loan approval authority to the Executive Committee of the Board of Directors. The Executive Committee is composed of five outside directors and the Chief Executive Officer. The Executive Committee establishes lending policies that include underwriting guidelines on the various types of loans made as well as guidance on loan terms. The Company employs a loan approval process in which individual loan officers are provided with independent approval authority based upon their experience and training. When prospective loans are analyzed, both interest rate and credit quality objectives are considered in determining whether to make a given loan. Parameters are set on the amount of credit that can be extended to one borrower. The largest amount that can generally be extended to any one borrower without obtaining approval from the Executive Committee of the Board of Directors is $150,000. The Executive Committee is authorized to extend credit to one borrower on an unsecured basis of up to 15% of statutory capital or approximately $4.8 million and on a secured basis of up to 25% of statutory capital or approximately $8 million.

The Bank offers a variety of loans to retail customers in the communities we serve.

Consumer Loans:

Consumer loans in general carry a moderate degree of risk compared to other loans. They are generally more risky than traditional residential real estate but less risky than commercial loans. Risk of default is generally determined by the well being of the national and local economies. During times of economic stress there is usually some level of job loss both nationally and locally, which directly affects the ability of the consumer to repay debt. Risk on consumer type loans is generally managed through policy limitations on debt levels consumer borrowers may carry and limitations on loan terms and amounts depending upon collateral type.

Various types of consumer loans include the following:

The various types of consumer loans all carry varying degrees of risk for the Bank. Loans secured by deposits carry little or no risk and in our experience have had a zero default rate. Home equity lines carry additional risk because of the increased difficulty of converting real estate to cash in the event of a default. However, underwriting policy provides mitigation to this risk in the form of a maximum loan to value ratio of 90% on a collateral type that has historically appreciated in value. The Bank also requires the customer to carry adequate insurance coverage to pay all mortgage debt in full if the collateral is destroyed. Vehicle financing carries

–24–

additional risks over loans secured by real estate in that the collateral is declining in value over the life of the loan and is mobile. Risks inherent in vehicle financing are managed by matching the loan term with the age and remaining useful life of the collateral to ensure the customer always has an equity position and is never “upside down.” Collateral is protected by requiring the customer to carry insurance showing the bank as loss payee. The Bank also has a blanket policy that covers the Bank in the event of a lapse in the borrower’s coverage and also provides assistance in locating collateral when necessary. Secured personal loans carry additional risks over the previous types in that they are generally smaller and made to borrowers with somewhat limited financial resources and credit histories. These loans are secured by a variety of collateral with varying degrees of marketability in the event of default. Risk on these types of loans is managed primarily at the underwriting level with guidelines for debt to income ratio limitations and conservative collateral valuations. Unsecured personal loans carry the greatest degree of risk in the consumer portfolio. Without collateral, the Bank is completely dependent on the commitment of the borrower to repay and the stability of the borrower’s income stream. Again, primary risk management occurs at the underwriting stage with guidelines for debt to income ratios, time in present job and in industry and policy guidelines relative to loan size as a percentage of net worth and liquid assets.

Commercial and Industrial Loans

The Bank makes loans to small and medium sized businesses in our primary trade area for purposes such as new or upgrades to plant and equipment, inventory acquisition and various working capital purposes. Commercial loans are granted to borrowers based on cash flow, ability to repay and degree of management expertise. This type loan may be subject to many different types of risk, which will differ depending on the particular industry the borrower is involved with. General risks to an industry, or segment of an industry, are monitored by senior management on an ongoing basis, when warranted. Individual borrowers who may be at risk due to an industry condition may be more closely analyzed and reviewed at a Loan Committee or Board of Directors level. On a regular basis, commercial and industrial borrowers are required to submit statements of financial condition relative to their business to the Bank for review. These statements are analyzed for trends and the loan is assigned a credit grade accordingly. Based on this grade the loan may receive an increased degree of scrutiny by management up to and including additional loss reserves being required.

This type loan is almost always collateralized. Generally, business assets are used and may consist of general intangibles, inventory, equipment or real estate. Collateral is subject to risk relative to conversion to a liquid asset if necessary as well as risks associated with degree of specialization, mobility and general collectibility in a default situation. To mitigate this risk to collateral, it is underwritten to strict standards including valuations and general acceptability based on the Bank’s ability to monitor its ongoing health and value.

Commercial Real Estate:

The Bank grants loans to borrowers secured by commercial real estate located in our market area. In underwriting these type loans we consider the historic and projected future cash flows of the real estate, we make an assessment of the physical condition and general location of the property and the effect these factors will have on its future desirability from a tenant standpoint. We will generally lend up to a maximum 75% loan to value ratio and require a minimum debt coverage ratio of 1.25% or other compensating factors.

Commercial real estate offers some risks not found in traditional residential real estate lending. Repayment is dependent upon successful management and marketing of properties and on the level of expense necessary to maintain the property. Repayment of these loans may be adversely affected by conditions in the real estate market or the general economy. Also commercial real estate loans typically involve relatively large loan balances to single borrowers. To mitigate these risks, we monitor our loan concentration and loans are audited

–25–

by a third party auditor. This type loan generally has a shorter maturity than other loan types giving the Bank an opportunity to reprice, restructure or decline to renew the credit. As with other loans, commercial real estate loans are graded depending upon strength of credit and performance. A lower grade will bring increased scrutiny by management and the Board of Directors.

Construction and Development Loans:

The Bank makes residential construction and development loans to customers in our market area. Loans are granted for both speculative projects and those being built with end buyers already secured. This type loan is subject primarily to market and general economic risk caused by inventory build-up in periods of economic prosperity. During times of economic stress this type loan has typically had a greater degree of risk than other loan types. To mitigate that risk, the Board of Directors and management reviews the entire portfolio on a monthly basis. The percentage of our portfolio being built on a speculative basis is tracked very closely. On a quarterly basis the portfolio is segmented by market area to allow analysis of exposure and a comparison to current inventory levels in these areas. To further mitigate risk, this type loan is accorded a larger percentage loan loss allowance than other loan types. Loan policy also provides for limits on speculative lending by borrower and by real estate project.

Loan Participations:

The Bank sells loan participations in the ordinary course of business when an originated loan exceeds its legal lending limit as defined by state banking laws. These loan participations are sold to other financial institutions without recourse. As of December 31, 2003 the Bank had no loan participations sold.

The Bank will also purchase loan participations from time to time from other banks in the ordinary course of business usually without recourse. Purchased loan participations are underwritten in accordance with the Ban’s loan policy and represent a source of loan growth to the Bank. Although the originating financial institution provides much of the initial underwriting documentation, management is responsible for the appropriate underwriting, approval and the on-going evaluation of the loan. One risk associated with purchasing loan participations is that the Bank often relies on information provided by the selling bank regarding collateral value and the borrower’s capacity to pay. To the extent this information is not accurate, the Bank may experience a loss on these participations. Otherwise, the Bank believes that the risk related to purchased loan participations is consistent with other similar type loans in the loan portfolio. If a purchased loan participation defaults, the Bank usually has no recourse against the selling bank but will take other commercially reasonable steps to minimize its loss. As of December 31, 2003, the Bank had purchased 65 loan participations. The total principal amount of these participations comprised 8.80% of our total portfolio on December 31, 2003.

Through the Company’s mortgage subsidiary, First Metro Mortgage Co., first mortgage loans are originated for immediate sale to investors. The loans are sold with servicing rights attached. These loans sold are sold at par, therefore no gain or loss is recognized on the sale of the loan. The fees received from the investor for the servicing rights along with other miscellaneous fees received from the borrower are included in mortgage banking income in the statements of income.

All loans originated by First Metro Mortgage Co. are classified as loans held for sale on the balance sheet because of the intention to immediately sell these loans. The balance of the loans held for sale represents individual mortgage loans that have been funded for which proceeds from, the investor have not yet been received. Loans held for sale are carried at the lower of aggregate cost or fair value. However, because the proceeds from the investors for the sale of these loans are usually received within fourteen days, the aggregate cost and fair value of these loans are the same.

–26–

For the year ended December 31, 2003, First Metro Mortgage Co. originated 473 loans totaling $68 million. These mortgage banking activities are performed exclusively by First Metro Mortgage Co. No similar activities are conducted at the Bank level. All loans originated by the Bank are classified as held for investment.

We have 83% of our loan portfolio collateralized by real estate located in our primary market area of Henry County, Georgia and surrounding counties. Our real estate mortgage portfolio consists of loans collateralized by one to four-family and multifamily residential properties (13%), construction loans to build one to four-family and multifamily residential properties (45%), and nonresidential properties consisting primarily of small business commercial properties (42%).

Liquidity and Capital Resources

The purpose of liquidity management is to ensure that there are sufficient cash flows to satisfy demands for credit, deposit withdrawals, and our other needs. Traditional sources of liquidity include asset maturities and growth in core deposits. A company may achieve its desired liquidity objectives from the management of assets and liabilities and through funds provided by operations. Funds invested in short-term marketable instruments and the continuous maturing of other earning assets are sources of liquidity from the asset perspective. The liability base provides sources of liquidity through deposit growth, the maturity structure of liabilities, and accessibility to market sources of funds.

Scheduled loan payments are a relatively stable source of funds, but loan payoffs and deposit flows fluctuate significantly, being influenced by interest rates and general economic conditions and competition. We attempt to price deposits to meet asset/liability objectives consistent with local market conditions.

Our liquidity and capital resources are monitored on a monthly basis by management and periodically by State and Federal regulatory authorities. As determined under guidelines established by regulatory authorities and internal policy, our liquidity ratio of 17% at December 31, 2003 was considered satisfactory.

At December 31, 2003, we had loan commitments outstanding of $80 million. Because these commitments generally have fixed expiration dates and many will expire without being drawn upon, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements. If needed, we have the ability on a short-term basis to borrow and purchase federal funds from other financial institutions. We had arrangements with two commercial banks for additional short-term advances of $19.8 million, of which $14.8 million had been drawn upon as of December 31, 2003. We also have the ability to borrow up to $78 million, subject to available collateral, from the Federal Home Loan Bank.

At December 31, 2003, our capital ratios were considered adequate based on regulatory minimum capital requirements. Stockholders’ equity increased in 2003 by $4.7 million as net income of $7.7 million was offset by a decrease in other comprehensive income related to our securities available-for-sale of $298,316 and by dividends paid of $2.7 million. For regulatory purposes, the net unrealized gains and losses on securities available-for-sale are excluded in the computation of the capital ratios.

In the future, the primary source of funds available to us will be the payment of dividends by the Bank. Banking regulations limit the amount of the dividends that may be paid without prior approval of the Bank’s regulatory agency. At December 31, 2003, the Bank could pay dividends of $3.7 million without regulatory approval.

–27–

The minimum capital requirements to be considered well capitalized under prompt corrective action provisions and the actual capital ratios for Henry County Bancshares, Inc. and the Bank as of December 31, 2003 are as follows:

These ratios may decline as asset growth continues, but are expected to exceed the regulatory minimum requirements to be considered well-capitalized. Anticipated future earnings will assist in keeping these ratios at satisfactory levels above the regulatory minimum requirement to be considered well-capitalized.

At December 31, 2003, we had approximately $356,000 of commitments for capital expenditures.

We believe that our liquidity and capital resources are adequate and will meet our foreseeable short and long-term needs. We anticipate that we will have sufficient funds available to meet current loan commitments and to fund or refinance, on a timely basis, our other material commitments and liabilities.

Contractual Obligations

Summarized below are our contractual obligations as of December 31, 2003.

Off-Balance-Sheet Financing

Our financial statements do not reflect various commitments and contingent liabilities that arise in the normal course of business. These off-balance-sheet financial instruments include commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit. These financial instruments are included in the financial statements when funds are distributed or the instruments become payable. We use the same credit policies in making commitments as we do for on-balance-sheet instruments. Our exposure to credit loss in the event of nonperformance by the other party to the financial instrument for commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit is represented by the contractual amount of those instruments. At December 31, 2003, we had outstanding commitments to extend credit through open lines of credit of approximately $75.3 million and outstanding standby letters of credit of approximately $4.5 million.

Management is not aware of any other known trends, events or uncertainties, other than those discussed above, that will have or that are reasonably likely to have a material effect on our liquidity, capital resources or operations. Management is also not aware of any current recommendations by the regulatory authorities that, if they were implemented, would have such an effect.

Effects of Inflation

The impact of inflation on banks differs from its impact on non-financial institutions. Banks, as financial intermediaries, have assets that are primarily monetary in nature and that tend to fluctuate in concert with inflation. A bank can reduce the impact of inflation if it can manage its rate sensitivity gap. This gap represents the difference between rate sensitive assets and rate sensitive liabilities. We, through our asset-liability committee, attempt to structure the assets and liabilities and manage the rate sensitivity gap, thereby seeking to minimize the potential effects of inflation. For information on the management of the Bank’s interest rate sensitive assets and liabilities, see the “Asset/Liability Management” section.

We do not engage in any transactions or have relationships or other arrangements with an unconsolidated entity. These include special purpose and similar entities or other off-balance sheet arrangements. We also do not trade in energy, weather or other commodity based contracts.

–28–

Results of Operations For The Years Ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001

The following is a summary of our operations for the years indicated.

Net Interest Income

Our results of operations are determined by our ability to manage interest income and expense effectively, to minimize loan and investment losses, to generate non-interest income, and to control operating expenses. Because interest rates are determined by market forces and economic conditions beyond our control, our ability to generate net interest income depends on our ability to obtain an adequate net interest spread between the rate we pay on interest-bearing liabilities and the rate we earn on interest-earning assets.

The net yield on average interest-earning assets decreased to 3.57% in 2003 from 3.73% in 2002. The average yield on interest-earning assets decreased to 5.63% in 2003 from 6.24 % in 2002. The average yield on interest-bearing liabilities decreased to 2.67% in 2003 from 3.13 % in 2002. By converting assets from investment assets to higher yielding loan assets, we were able to maintain our net interest income at levels comparable to 2002.

The net yield on average interest-earning assets decreased to 3.73% in 2002 from 3.79% in 2001. The average yield on interest-earning assets decreased to 6.24% in 2002 from 7.53% in 2001. The average yield on interest-earning liabilities decreased to 3.13% in 2002 from 4.59% in 2001. By selectively repricing deposit liabilities, as well as converting assets to higher yielding loan assets, we were able to substantially maintain our net yield during this period of falling interest rates.

Net interest income decreased by $2,000 in 2003 as compared to $396 thousand in 2002 and increased by $1.1 million in 2001 as compared to 2000. The decrease in 2003, though insignificant, was attributed to lower interest rates, offset by an overall increase in interest-earning assets, particularly higher earning assets such as loans versus a decline in lower earning assets such as securities and federal funds sold.

Provision for Loan Losses

The provision for loan losses decreased by $68,000 to $472,500 in 2003 and decreased by $9,500 to $540,500 in 2002. The amounts provided are due primarily to our assessment of the inherent risk in the loan portfolio. Please see the section titled “Allowance for Loan Losses” for a more detailed explanation of our assessment

–29–

criteria as it relates to providing for loan losses. We believe that the $4.2 million in the allowance for loan losses at December 31, 2003, or 1.00% of total net outstanding loans and the $3.8 million in the allowance for loan losses at December 31, 2002, or 1.09% of total net outstanding loans, are adequate at their respective dates to absorb known risks in the portfolio based upon our historical experience. Our net charge-offs were minimal in 2003, 2002 and 2001 as the ratio of charged-off loan to average loans outstanding was .03%, .03% and .02%, respectively. No assurance can be given, however, that increased loan volume, and adverse economic conditions or other circumstances will not result in increased losses in our loan portfolio.

Other Income

Other income consists of service charges on deposit accounts, mortgage origination fees, gains and losses on securities transactions, gains on sale of land and other miscellaneous revenues and fees. Other income was $5.5 million in 2003 as compared to $4.5 million in 2002. The net increase is due primarily to increased service charges on deposit accounts of $206,000, increased mortgage banking income earned by First Metro Mortgage Co. of $556,000, as well as the gain of $217,000 on the sale of land adjacent to our Crumbley Road branch.

The decrease in other income to $4.5 million in 2002 from $4.6 million in 2001 was due to decreased service charges on deposit accounts of $100,000 and decreased mortgage banking income of $296,000, offset by an increase in other service charges and fees of $119,000 and gains on security transactions of $80,000.

Other Expenses

Other expenses were $9.4 million in 2003 as compared to $9.1 million in 2002, an increase of $283,037. Gross salaries and employees benefits’ increased by $394,551 due to an increase in the number of full time equivalent employees to 144 at December 31, 2003 as compared to 135 at December 31, 2002, as well as increased mortgage commissions relating to increased mortgage banking income.. Salaries and employee benefits’, net of capitalized loan fees of $1.4 million, amounted to $5.8 million at December 31, 2003 as compared to $5.7 million at December 31, 2002. Equipment and occupancy expenses increased by $99,556 in 2003 as compared to 2002, primarily as a result of increased ATM and service contract expenses. Other operating expenses increased by only $100,573 as there was no significant increase or decrease in individual other operating expense accounts, other than the costs normally associated with continued growth.

The increase in other expenses to $9.1 million in 2002 from $8.8 million in 2001 was due to increased salary and employee benefits of $99,000, increased equipment and occupancy expense of $61,000 and increased other operating expenses of $192,000.

Income Tax

Income tax expense was $4.2 million in 2003 as compared to $3.9 million in 2002. The increase is due to higher pretax income, in addition to a lower volume of nontaxable securities held in the securities portfolio. Income tax expense as a percentage of pretax income was 35% at December 31, 2003 as compared to 34% at December 31, 2002.

The decrease in income tax expense to $3.9 million in 2002 from $4.1 million in 2001 was due to lower pretax income and to a lower volume of nontaxable securities. Income tax as a percentage of pretax income was 34% in 2002 and 2001.

–30–

SELECTED FINANCIAL INFORMATION AND STATISTICAL DATA

The tables and schedules on the following pages set forth certain financial information and statistical data with respect to: the distribution of assets, liabilities and stockholders’ equity; interest rates and interest differentials; interest rate sensitivity gap ratios; the securities portfolio; the loan portfolio; including types of loans, maturities and sensitivities to changes in interest rates and information on nonperforming loans; summary of the loan loss experience and allowance for loan losses; types of deposits; and the return on equity and assets.

The following table sets forth the amount of our interest income or interest expense for each category of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities and the average interest yield/rate for total interest-earning assets and total interest-bearing liabilities, net interest spread and net yield on average interest-earning assets.

–31–

Table 1 - Distribution of Assets, Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity

                 Interest Rates and Interest Differentials

Table 2 - Rate and Volume Analysis

The following table describes the extent to which changes in interest rates and changes in volume of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities have affected our interest income and expense during the years indicated. For each category of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, information is provided on changes attributable to (1) change in volume (change in volume multiplied by old rate); (2) change in rate (change in rate multiplied by old volume); and (3) a combination of change in rate and change in volume. The changes in interest income and interest expense attributable to both volume and rate have been allocated proportionately to the change due to volume and the change due to rate.

–32–