Back to GetFilings.com

Table of Contents

UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

Annual Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003

Commission File No.: 001-16753

AMN HEALTHCARE SERVICES, INC.

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)

Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code: (866) 871-8519

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: Common Stock, $0.01 par value

Name of each exchange on which registered: New York Stock Exchange

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

None.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No ¨

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. þ

Indicate by a check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934). Yes þ No ¨

As of June 30, 2003, the approximate aggregate market value of voting stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant was $253,456,237 based on a closing sale price of $12.70 per share. As of March 9, 2004, there were 28,120,340 shares of common stock, $0.01 par value, outstanding.

Documents Incorporated By Reference: Portions of the registrant’s definitive Proxy Statement for the annual meeting of shareholders to be held on May 18, 2004 have been incorporated by reference into part III of this Form 10-K.

Table of Contents

TABLE OF CONTENTS

i

Table of Contents

PART I

Item 1.    Business

Our Company

AMN Healthcare Services, Inc. is a leading temporary healthcare staffing company and the largest nationwide provider of travel nurse staffing services. We recruit nurses and allied health professionals, nationally and internationally, our “temporary healthcare professionals,” and place them on temporary assignments of variable lengths at acute care hospitals and healthcare facilities throughout the United States. Approximately 94% of our temporary healthcare professionals are nurses, while the remainder are technicians, therapists and technologists. We are actively working with a pre-screened pool of prospective temporary healthcare professionals, of whom an average of over 6,300 were on assignment during the fourth quarter of 2003.

Our services are marketed to two distinct customer bases: (1) temporary healthcare professionals and (2) hospital and healthcare facility clients. We use a multi-brand recruiting strategy to enhance our ability to successfully attract temporary healthcare professionals in the United States and internationally. Our seven separate recruitment brands, American Mobile Healthcare, Medical Express, NursesRx, Preferred Healthcare Staffing, HRMC, Thera Tech Staffing and O’Grady-Peyton International, have distinct geographic market strengths and brand reputations. Nurses and allied healthcare professionals join us for a variety of reasons that include: seeking flexible work opportunities, traveling to different areas of the country, building their clinical skills and resume by working at prestigious healthcare facilities, and escaping the demands and political environment of working as a permanent staff nurse. Our large number of hospital and healthcare facility clients allows us to offer traveling positions in all 50 states and in a variety of work environments. In addition, we provide our temporary healthcare professionals with an attractive benefits package, including free or subsidized housing, travel reimbursement, professional development opportunities, a 401(k) plan and health insurance. We believe that we attract temporary healthcare professionals due to our long-standing reputation for providing a high level of service, our numerous job opportunities, our benefit packages, our innovative marketing programs and, our most effective recruiting tool, word-of-mouth referrals from our thousands of current and former temporary healthcare professionals.

We market our services to hospitals and healthcare facilities under one brand, AMN Healthcare, as a single staffing provider with access to temporary healthcare professionals from seven recruitment brands. At the end of 2003, we had over 4,300 hospital and healthcare facility clients. Over 97% of our temporary healthcare professional assignments are at acute-care hospitals. Our clients include hospitals and healthcare systems such as Georgetown University Hospital, HCA, NYU Medical Center, Stanford Health Care, UCLA Medical Center and The University of Chicago Hospitals. We also provide services to sub-acute healthcare facilities, dialysis centers, clinics and schools. Our hospital and healthcare facility clients utilize our services to cost-effectively manage shortages in their staff due to a variety of circumstances, such as the Family Medical Leave Act (FMLA), new unit openings, seasonal patient census variations and other short and long-term staffing needs. In addition to providing continuity of care and quality patient care, we believe hospitals and healthcare facilities contract with us due to our high-quality temporary healthcare professionals, our ability to meet their specific staffing needs, our flexible staffing assignment lengths, our reliable and deep infrastructure, our superior customer service and our ability to offer a large national network of temporary healthcare professionals.

We believe that we have organized our operating model to deliver consistent, high-quality sales and service efforts to our two distinct client bases. Processes within our operating model have been developed and are in place with the intent to maximize the quantity and quality of assignment requests, or “orders,” from our hospital and healthcare facility clients and increase the expediency and probability of successfully placing our temporary healthcare professionals. The consistent quality of the benefit and support services which we provide to our temporary healthcare professionals is also critical to our success, since the majority of our temporary healthcare professionals stay with us for multiple assignments and we believe our largest source of new candidates is word-of-mouth referrals from satisfied current and former temporary healthcare professionals.

1

Table of Contents

Industry Overview

In 2003, total healthcare expenditures in the United States were estimated at $1.7 trillion, representing approximately 15% of the U.S. gross domestic product, and had grown approximately 8% over 2002 according to the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. Over the next decade, an aging U.S. population and advances in medical technology are expected to drive increases in hospital patient populations and the consumption of healthcare services. As a result, total healthcare expenditures are projected to increase to approximately $3.3 trillion during the next decade.

Within the healthcare staffing sector, temporary staffing has emerged over the last several years as a business practice to efficiently deliver healthcare services. In the mid-1990s, several factors prompted the increased usage of temporary staffing at hospitals. A principal factor was cost containment. Managed care, Medicare, Medicaid and competitive pressures created renewed emphasis on cost containment. Among other industry responses, this led acute-care hospitals to redesign their staffing models to reduce their levels of fixed staffing and to include a variable staffing component.

The temporary healthcare staffing industry accounted for approximately $10.4 billion in revenue in 2003 according to estimates by The Staffing Industry Report. Approximately 70% of the temporary healthcare staffing industry is comprised of nurse staffing and approximately 30% is comprised of allied health, physicians and other healthcare professionals. Temporary healthcare staffing has experienced strong historical growth from 1998 through estimated 2003, growing at a compound annual rate of 16.5%.

Demand and Supply Drivers

Since the mid-1990s, changes in the healthcare industry prompted a fundamental shift in staffing models that led to an increased usage of temporary staffing at hospitals and other healthcare facilities. The supply of professionals choosing travel healthcare as a short-term or long-term career option has also grown alongside increased demand for temporary healthcare professionals. We believe that this expanded demand and supply pattern will continue over the long-term, particularly in the travel nurse staffing sector, because of the following drivers:

Demand Drivers

2

Table of Contents

Supply Drivers

3

Table of Contents

Growth Strategy

Our goal is to expand our leadership position within the temporary healthcare staffing sector in the United States. The key components of our business strategy include:

4

Table of Contents

Recent Trends

From 1996 through 2000, the temporary healthcare staffing industry grew at a compound annual growth rate of approximately 13%, and this growth accelerated to a compound annual growth rate of approximately 21% from 2000 to 2002. Over the last year, the demand for temporary healthcare professionals has declined due to a number of factors. In particular, we believe hospitals have increased their nurse recruitment efforts, stretched the productivity of permanent staff and maximized the cost-effectiveness of outsourced staffing solutions. In addition, because of the recent economic conditions, we believe permanent staff at our hospital and healthcare facility clients have been more likely to work overtime and less likely to leave their positions, creating fewer vacancies and fewer opportunities for us to place our temporary healthcare professionals.

The number of temporary healthcare professionals on assignment for the year decreased 9% from an average of 7,783 in 2002 to an average of 7,113 in 2003. Additionally, during the fourth quarter of 2003, we had an average of 6,339 temporary healthcare professionals on assignment. As a result of this decline, revenue and net income decreased throughout 2003. Demand for our services stabilized from April 2003 through October 2003, and has increased since then, throughout many regions. We believe that this increase in the number of orders placed by our hospital and healthcare facility clients is a result of increased hospital admission growth and legislation impacting healthcare staffing throughout the United States, such as the California nurse staffing ratios that went into effect in January 2004. In addition, we believe signs of an improving economy and our increased focus on our hospital and healthcare facility clients have driven the recent increase in demand. We believe we will continue to experience a lag between when changes in demand occur and when our operations processes translate into changes in the number of temporary healthcare professionals on assignment and our financial results. Therefore, the changes in demand experienced in our industry could also result in continued changes in revenue and net income in subsequent quarters, and it is uncertain whether the recent increase in demand will drive increases in the average number of temporary healthcare professionals on assignment.

Business Overview

Services Provided

Hospitals and healthcare facilities generally obtain supplemental staffing from two sources, local temporary (per diem) agencies and national travel healthcare staffing companies. Per diem staffing, which has historically comprised the majority of the temporary healthcare staffing industry, involves the placement of locally-based healthcare professionals on daily (per diem) shift work, on an as needed basis. Hospitals and healthcare facilities often give only a few hours notice of their per diem assignments, and require a quick turnaround from their staffing agencies, generally less than 24 hours. Travel staffing, on the other hand, provides healthcare facilities with staffing solutions to address anticipated staffing requirements, typically for 8, 13 or 26 weeks. In contrast to per diem agencies, travel staffing companies select from a national (and in some cases international) skilled labor pool and provide pre-screened candidates to their hospital and healthcare facility clients, often at a lower cost. We focus on the travel segment of the temporary healthcare staffing industry, and provide both nurse and allied health temporary healthcare professionals to our hospital and healthcare facility clients.

Nurses.    We provide medical nurses, surgical nurses, specialty nurses, licensed practical or vocational nurses and advanced practice nurses in a wide range of specialties for travel assignments throughout the United States. We place our qualified nurse professionals with premier, nationally recognized hospitals and hospital

5

Table of Contents

systems. The majority of our assignments are in acute-care hospitals, including teaching institutions, trauma centers and community hospitals. Nurses comprise approximately 94% of the total temporary healthcare professionals currently working for us. We typically place the majority of our nurses on 13-week assignments, but offer a longer term, typically 18-month staffing solution with our international nurses that we recruit primarily from English speaking countries.

Allied Health Professionals.    We also provide allied health professionals to acute-care hospitals and other healthcare facilities such as skilled nursing facilities, rehabilitation clinics and schools. Allied health professionals include such disciplines as surgical technologists, respiratory therapists, medical and radiology technologists, dialysis technicians, speech pathologists and rehabilitation assistants. Allied health professionals comprise approximately 6% of the total temporary healthcare professionals currently working for us.

Multi-Brand Recruiting

In order to enhance our opportunities to expand our network of traveling professionals, we recruit temporary healthcare professionals in the United States and internationally under each of our seven recruitment brand names: American Mobile Healthcare, Medical Express, NursesRx, Preferred Healthcare Staffing, HRMC, Thera Tech Staffing and O’Grady-Peyton International. While all of our brands have the capability to place temporary healthcare professionals on assignments that we have throughout the United States using the same placement opportunities, our brands have distinct geographic market strengths and brand reputations, which enhance our recruitment opportunities.

It is common for temporary healthcare professionals to register with more than one brand in order to utilize more than one recruiter. Our multi-brand recruiting strategy provides us with a competitive advantage, as potential temporary healthcare professionals are able to work with more than one of our brand recruiters. Accordingly, we believe that our probability of successfully placing the temporary healthcare professional on assignment is enhanced.

To our hospital and healthcare facility clients, however, we market and administer our services under the single corporate brand of AMN Healthcare. Hospitals and healthcare facility clients, in turn, have the advantage of managing one contract with us, but receiving the benefit of seven nationally known brands that recruit temporary healthcare professionals for their open positions.

6

Table of Contents

The following chart depicts our single staffing provider and multi-brand recruiting model:

National Presence and Diversified Hospital and Healthcare Facility Client Base

We offer our temporary healthcare professionals nationwide placement opportunities and provide temporary staffing solutions to our hospital and healthcare facility clients that are located throughout the United States. We typically have open temporary healthcare professional requests, or “orders,” in all 50 states. The largest percentages of these open orders are typically concentrated in heavily populated states such as Arizona, California, Florida, New York and Texas.

The number of our hospital and healthcare facility clients that we serve has grown from approximately 600 in 1993 to over 3,600 and 4,300 at the end of 2002 and 2003, respectively. Over 97% of our temporary healthcare professional assignments are at acute-care hospitals. In addition to acute-care hospitals, we also provide services to sub-acute healthcare facilities, dialysis centers, clinics and schools. Our clients include hospitals and healthcare systems such as Georgetown University Hospital, HCA, NYU Medical Center, Scripps Health Systems, Stanford Health Care, Swedish Health Services, Texas Children’s Hospital, UCLA Medical Center and

7

Table of Contents

The University of Chicago Hospitals. As of December 31, 2003, no single client, including affiliated groups, comprised more than 10% of our temporary healthcare professionals on assignment and no single client facility comprised more than 3% of our temporary healthcare professionals on assignment.

Our Business Model

We have developed and continually refined our business model to achieve greater levels of productivity and efficiency. Our model is designed to optimize the communication with, and service to, both our temporary healthcare professionals and our hospital and healthcare facility clients.

The following graph illustrates the elements of our business model:

Marketing and Recruitment of New Temporary Healthcare Professionals

We believe that nursing and allied health professionals are attracted to us because of our customer service and relationship-oriented approach, our competitive compensation and benefits package, and our large and diverse offering of work assignments that provide the opportunity to travel to numerous attractive locations throughout the United States.

We believe that our multi-brand recruiting strategy makes us more effective at reaching a larger number of temporary healthcare professionals. Because it is common for these healthcare professionals to register with more than one brand in the industry, we believe that by offering seven distinct brands we increase our ability to recruit temporary healthcare professionals. Each brand has its own distinct identity to prospective temporary healthcare professionals, allowing us to segment the nursing population. We have conducted research to identify and categorize our temporary healthcare professionals into several categories, which allows us to market to specific nurses that meet the specific needs of our hospital clients. We tailor the marketing of each of our brands through a combination of websites, journal advertising, conferences and conventions, direct mail, printed marketing material and, most importantly, through personal word-of-mouth referrals from current and former temporary healthcare professionals. We also operate NurseZone.com and RN.com, two leading nurse community websites. NurseZone.com caters to the professional and personal lives of nurses, offering nursing news and updates, links to

8

Table of Contents

other Internet sites, discounted products and services, continuing education courses and career opportunities sponsored by our recruitment brands, including an online temporary healthcare professional application process. RN.com offers online education opportunities for nurses, other online nurse related services and an online temporary healthcare professional application process. In addition, we operate a variety of other websites, including Travelnursing.com and Nursingjobs.com. Our leading recruitment brands are featured on each website, and each website includes an easy and efficient online application process where temporary healthcare professionals can complete one application online and have it sent to each of the brands of their choice.

Screening and Quality Management

Through our quality management department, we screen all candidates prior to their placement, and we continue to evaluate our temporary healthcare professionals after they are placed to ensure adequate performance as well as to determine feasibility for future placements. Our internal processes are designed to ensure that our temporary healthcare professionals have the appropriate experience, credentials and skills for the assignments that they accept. Our experience has shown us that well-matched placements result in satisfied temporary healthcare professionals and healthcare facility clients. Our screening and quality management process includes three principal stages:

Initial screening.    Each new temporary healthcare professional candidate who submits an application with us must meet certain criteria, including appropriate prior work experience and proper educational and licensing credentials. We independently verify each applicant’s work history and references to reasonably ensure that our hospital and healthcare facility clients may depend on our temporary healthcare professionals for clinical competency and personal reliability. Our proprietary clinical skills checklists, developed for each healthcare specialty area, are used by our hospital and healthcare facility clients’ hiring managers as a basis for evaluating candidates and conducting interviews, and for facilitating the selection of a temporary healthcare professional who can meet the hospital or healthcare facility client’s specific needs.

Assignment specific screening.    Once an assignment is accepted by a temporary healthcare professional, our quality management department tracks the necessary documentation and license verification required for the temporary healthcare professional to meet the requirements set forth by us, the hospital or healthcare facility and, when required, the applicable state board of health or nursing. Additionally, where state and federal laws apply with regard to the employment of healthcare workers, we have in place the necessary procedures to ensure compliance with these requirements. These requirements may include obtaining copies of specific health records, drug screening, criminal background checks and certain certifications or continuing education courses.

Ongoing evaluation.    We continually evaluate our temporary healthcare professionals’ performance through a verbal and written evaluation process. We receive these evaluations directly from our hospital and healthcare facility clients, and use the feedback to determine appropriate future assignments for each temporary healthcare professional.

Sales, Marketing and Account Management

We market our services to hospitals and healthcare facilities under one corporate brand name, AMN Healthcare, a single staffing provider with seven recruitment sources of temporary healthcare professionals: American Mobile Healthcare, Medical Express, NursesRx, Preferred Healthcare Staffing, HRMC, Thera Tech Staffing and O’Grady-Peyton International. Furthermore, we utilize a team approach to servicing our hospital and healthcare facility clients. This team includes:

Regional Client Service Director.    Our team of regional client service directors markets our services to prospective hospital and healthcare facility clients, and supervises ongoing contract management and business development of existing clients in each of their territories.

Hospital Account Manager.    Once hospital and healthcare facility contracts are obtained by our regional client service directors, our hospital account managers are responsible for soliciting and receiving orders from

9

Table of Contents

these clients and working with our recruiters to fill those orders with qualified temporary healthcare professionals. An “order” is a request from a client hospital or healthcare facility for a temporary healthcare professional to fill an assignment. Depending upon their size and specific needs, one hospital or healthcare facility client may have from one to over 50 open orders at one time.

Because hospitals often list their orders with multiple service providers, open orders may also be listed with our competitors. An order will generally be filled by the company that provides a suitable candidate first, highlighting the need for a large network of temporary healthcare professionals and integrated operating and information systems to quickly and effectively match hospital and healthcare facility client needs with appropriate temporary healthcare professionals.

Clinical Liaison.    We liaison with our hospital and healthcare facility clients and temporary healthcare professionals on clinical issues. We continually evaluate our temporary healthcare professionals’ performance through a verbal and written evaluation process.

The number of our hospital and healthcare facility clients that we have contracts with has grown from approximately 600 in 1993 to over 3,600 and 4,300 clients at the end of 2002 and 2003, respectively. Over 97% of our temporary healthcare professional assignments are at acute-care hospitals. In addition to acute-care hospitals, we also provide services to sub-acute healthcare facilities, dialysis centers, clinics and schools.

Placement

Orders are entered into our information network and are available to the recruiters at all of our recruitment brands. Our recruiters electronically provide our hospital account managers with the personnel profiles of the temporary healthcare professionals who have expressed an interest in a particular assignment. The hospital account manager follows up to arrange a telephone interview between the temporary healthcare professional and the hospital, and confirms offers and placements with the hospital or healthcare facility.

Our recruiters seek to develop and maintain strong and lasting relationships with our temporary healthcare professionals. Each recruiter manages a group of pre-screened temporary healthcare professionals and works to understand the unique needs and desires of each healthcare professional. The recruiter will present open order assignments to a temporary healthcare professional, request that the personnel profile be submitted for placement consideration, arrange a telephone interview with assistance from the hospital account managers, make any special requests for housing and generally facilitate each placement.

In the case of our international temporary healthcare professionals, the recruiters and placement coordinators at our O’Grady-Peyton International brand, including those located in the United Kingdom, Australia and South Africa, assist candidates in preparing for the United States nursing examination and subsequently obtaining a U.S. nursing license. These recruiters also assist our international temporary healthcare professionals to obtain petitions to become lawful permanent residents or to obtain work visas prior to their arrival in the United States.

Throughout the typical 13-week assignment, the recruiters will work with the temporary healthcare professionals to review their progress and to determine whether the professionals would like to extend the length of the current assignment, or move to a new hospital or healthcare facility at the end of the assignment term. Our international temporary healthcare professionals are typically placed on longer-term, 18-month assignments as a result of our substantial investment in bringing them to work in the United States. Near completion of the 18-month assignment, our recruiters will work with these temporary healthcare professionals to explore their options for new assignments, including our more traditional 13-week arrangements.

We share orders among our various brands to increase placement opportunities for our temporary healthcare professionals. Our growth in placement volume has been driven by enabling our recruiters at all of our brands to offer more open assignment orders to their temporary healthcare professionals.

10

Table of Contents

Housing

We offer substantially all of our temporary healthcare professionals free or subsidized housing while on assignment. Our housing department is centralized and managed at our San Diego, California corporate headquarters and an internally developed software system is used to manage rental properties, furniture vendors and other housing services. Our housing department facilitates the leasing of all apartments and furniture, manages utilities and arranges all housing and roommate assignments for the thousands of temporary healthcare professionals that we place each year. We generally offer our temporary healthcare professionals a free two-bedroom apartment to share with another temporary healthcare professional. If a temporary healthcare professional desires to have a private, one-bedroom apartment, they typically pay a housing fee to us to cover the incremental costs. If a temporary healthcare professional chooses not to accept housing provided by us, they receive a monthly housing stipend in lieu of an apartment. Generally, our international temporary healthcare professionals are provided with increased travel reimbursements and assistance with immigration costs in lieu of free or subsidized housing. We currently lease over 3,000 apartments nationwide with a monthly housing expense of over $4.5 million.

Housing expenses are typically included in the hourly or weekly fees that we charge to our hospital and healthcare facility clients. Based on the contracted billing rate and gross profit for each hospital or healthcare facility client, we estimate a budget for our housing coordinators to utilize when locating apartments for each assignment. We carefully monitor performance of actual housing costs incurred to the housing costs budgeted for each placement. If housing costs rise in a particular city or region, our housing department tracks these trends and communicates with our regional client service directors to obtain increased billing rates to cover these costs. We also negotiate contracts with national property management and furniture rental companies to leverage our size and obtain more favorable pricing and terms.

Temporary Healthcare Professional Payroll

During 2003, approximately 94% of our working temporary healthcare professionals were on our payroll, while approximately 6% were paid directly by the hospital or healthcare facility client. Providing payroll services is a value-added and convenient service that hospitals and healthcare facilities increasingly expect from their supplemental staffing sources. To provide convenience and flexibility to our hospital and healthcare facility clients, we accommodate several different payroll cycles and allow the client to choose the cycle that most closely matches that of their permanent staff. This enables our hospital and healthcare facility clients to integrate management of temporary healthcare professional scheduling and overtime with their permanent staff.

Consistent accuracy and timeliness of making payroll payments is essential to the retention of our temporary healthcare professionals. Our internal payroll service group currently receives and processes timesheets for over 6,000 temporary healthcare professionals. Payroll is typically processed within 72 hours after the completion of each pay period, heightening the importance of having adequately trained and skilled payroll personnel and appropriate operating and information systems. In November 2003, we implemented an upgraded payroll and billing software system for our temporary healthcare professionals. We are now processing payroll in-house, but continuing to outsource the printing, tax deposit and reporting functions to a national payroll processing service. This system provides a platform that will enable us to add enhanced features to better service our healthcare professionals in the future.

Our payroll service group offers our temporary healthcare professionals several service benefits, including multi-account direct deposit, automatic 401(k) deductions, dependent care and flexible spending account deductions, health insurance co-pay deductions and housing co-pay deductions when the temporary healthcare professional chooses to upgrade their housing accommodation.

11

Table of Contents

Temporary Healthcare Professional Benefits

In our effort to attract and retain highly qualified traveling professionals, we offer a variety of benefits to our temporary healthcare professionals. These benefits include:

Hospital Billing

To accommodate the needs of our hospital clients, we offer two types of billing: payroll contracts and flat rate contracts. During 2003, we billed approximately 94% of working temporary healthcare professionals based on payroll contracts and approximately 6% based on flat rate contracts.

Payroll Contracts.    Under a payroll contract, the temporary healthcare professional is our employee for payroll and benefits purposes. Under this arrangement, we bill our hospital and healthcare facility clients at an hourly rate which effectively includes reimbursement for recruitment fees, wages and benefits for the temporary healthcare professional, employer taxes and housing expenses. Overtime, shift differential and holiday hours worked are typically billed at a premium rate. In turn, we pay the temporary healthcare professional’s wages, housing and travel costs and benefits. Providing payroll services is a value-added and convenient service that hospitals and healthcare facilities increasingly expect from their supplemental staffing sources. Providing these payroll services, which is cash flow intensive, also gives us a competitive edge over smaller staffing firms.

Flat Rate Contracts.    With flat rate billing, the temporary healthcare professional is placed on the hospital or healthcare facility client’s payroll. We bill the hospital a “flat” weekly rate that includes reimbursement for recruitment fees, temporary healthcare professional benefits and typically housing expenses.

Information Systems

Our primary management information and communications systems are centralized and controlled in our corporate headquarters and are utilized in each of our staffing offices. Our financial and payroll systems are

12

Table of Contents

primarily centralized at our corporate headquarters and our operational reporting is standardized at all of our offices. In November 2003, we implemented an upgraded payroll and billing software system for our temporary healthcare professionals. We are now processing payroll in-house, but continuing to outsource the printing, tax deposit and reporting functions to a national payroll processing service. This system provides a platform that will enable us to add enhanced features to better service our healthcare professionals in the future.

During the past few years, we have developed a proprietary information system called American Mobile Information Exchange, or “AMIE.” AMIE is a Windows-based, interactive system that is an important tool in maximizing our productivity and accommodating our multi-brand recruiting strategy. The system was custom-designed for our business model, including integrated processes for temporary healthcare professional and healthcare facility contract management, matching of temporary healthcare professionals to available assignments, temporary healthcare professional file submissions for placements, quality management tracking, controlling compensation packages and managing healthcare facility contract and billing terms. AMIE provides our staff with fast, detailed information regarding individual temporary healthcare professionals and hospital and healthcare facility clients. AMIE also provides a platform for interacting and transacting with temporary healthcare professionals and hospital and healthcare facility clients via the Internet.

Risk Management

We have developed an integrated risk management program that focuses on loss analysis, education and assessment in an effort to reduce our operational costs and risk exposure. We continually analyze our losses on professional liability claims and workers compensation claims to identify trends. This allows us to focus our resources on those areas that may have the greatest impact on us. We have also developed educational materials for distribution to our temporary healthcare professionals that are targeted to address specific work-injury risks and documentation of clinical events. In addition, we have compiled a universal safety manual that every temporary healthcare professional receives each year.

In addition to our proactive measures, we engage in a peer review process of any incidents involving our temporary healthcare professionals. Upon notification of a temporary healthcare professional’s involvement in an incident that may result in liability for us, a team of registered nurses reviews the temporary healthcare professional’s actions. Our peer review committee makes a prompt determination regarding whether the temporary healthcare professional will continue the assignment and whether we will place the temporary healthcare professional on future assignments.

Competition

The healthcare staffing industry is highly competitive. We compete with both national firms and local and regional firms. We compete with these firms to attract nurses and other healthcare professionals as temporary healthcare professionals and to attract hospital and healthcare facility clients. We compete for temporary healthcare professionals on the basis of customer service and expertise, the quantity, diversity and quality of assignments available, compensation packages, and the benefits that we provide to a temporary healthcare professional while they are on an assignment. We compete for hospital and healthcare facility clients on the basis of the quality of our temporary healthcare professionals, the timely availability of our professionals with requisite skills, the quality, scope and price of our services, our recruitment expertise and the geographic reach of our services.

We believe that larger, nationally established firms enjoy distinct competitive advantages over smaller, local and regional competitors in the travel healthcare staffing industry. Continuing nursing shortages and factors driving the demand for nurses over the past several years have made it increasingly difficult for hospitals to meet their staffing needs. More established firms have a large pool of available nursing candidates, substantial word-of-mouth referral networks and established brand names, enabling them to attract a consistent flow of new applicants. Larger firms generally have a deeper, more comprehensive infrastructure and can also more easily provide payroll services, which are cash flow intensive.

13

Table of Contents

Some of our larger competitors in the temporary healthcare staffing sector include Cross Country, InteliStaf/StarMed, Nursefinders, Medical Staffing Network and On Assignment.

Government Regulation

The healthcare industry is subject to extensive and complex federal and state laws and regulations related to professional licensure, conduct of operations, payment for services and payment for referrals. Our business, however, is not directly impacted by or subject to the extensive and complex laws and regulations that generally govern the healthcare industry. The laws and regulations that are applicable to our hospital and healthcare facility clients could indirectly impact our business to a certain extent, but because we provide services on a contract basis and are paid directly by our hospital and healthcare facility clients, we do not have any direct Medicare or managed care reimbursement risk.

Some states require state licensure for businesses that employ and/or assign healthcare personnel to provide healthcare services on-site at hospitals and other healthcare facilities. We are currently licensed in all twelve states that require such licenses.

Most of the temporary healthcare professionals that we employ are required to be individually licensed or certified under applicable state laws. We take prudent steps to ensure that our employees possess all necessary licenses and certifications in all material respects.

We recruit some temporary healthcare professionals from Canada for placement in the United States. Canadian healthcare professionals can come to the United States on TN Visas under the North American Free Trade Agreement. TN Visas are renewable, one-year temporary work visas, which generally allow entrance into the United States provided the healthcare professional presents at the border proof of waiting employment in the United States and evidence of the necessary healthcare practice licenses.

With respect to our recruitment of international temporary healthcare professionals through our O’Grady-Peyton International brand, we must comply with certain United States immigration law requirements, including the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996. We primarily bring temporary healthcare professionals to the United States as immigrants, or lawful permanent residents (commonly referred to as “green card” holders). We screen foreign temporary healthcare professionals and assist them in preparing for the national nursing examination and subsequently obtaining a U.S. nursing license. We file petitions with the Immigration and Naturalization Service for a temporary healthcare professional to become a permanent resident of the United States or obtain necessary work visas. Generally, such petitions are accompanied by proof that the temporary healthcare professional has either passed the Commission on Graduates of Foreign Nursing Schools Examination or holds a full and unrestricted state license to practice professional nursing, as well as a contract between us and the temporary healthcare professional demonstrating that there is a bona fide job offer.

Employees

As of December 31, 2003, we had 834 corporate employees. We believe that our employee relations are good. The following chart shows our number of corporate employees by department:

14

Table of Contents

During the fourth quarter of 2003, we had an average of over 6,300 temporary healthcare professionals working on assignment.

Additional Information

We maintain a corporate website at www.amnhealthcare.com/investors. Our Annual Reports on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K and amendments to these reports, are made available, free of charge, through this website as soon as reasonably practicable after being filed with or furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Item 2.    Properties

We believe that our properties are adequate for our current needs. In addition, we believe that adequate space can be obtained to meet our foreseeable business needs. We relocated and consolidated our San Diego, California headquarters during the second half of 2003. We currently occupy office space in ten locations, as identified in the chart below:

Item 3.    Legal Proceedings

We are subject to various claims and legal actions in the ordinary course of our business. Some of these matters include professional liability, payroll and employee-related matters and inquiries and investigations by governmental agencies regarding our employment practices. We are not aware of any pending or threatened litigation that we believe is reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial position or liquidity.

Our hospital and healthcare facility clients may also become subject to claims, governmental inquiries and investigations and legal actions to which we may become a party relating to services provided by our professionals. From time to time, and depending upon the particular facts and circumstances, we may be subject to indemnification obligations under our contracts with our hospital and healthcare facility clients relating to these matters. At this time, we are not aware of any such pending or threatened litigation that we believe is reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial position or liquidity.

Item 4.    Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

No matters were submitted to a vote of security holders during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2003.

15

Table of Contents

PART II

Item 5.    Market for Registrant’s Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters

Our common stock has traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol “AHS” since our initial public offering on November 13, 2001. Prior to that time, there was no public trading market for our common stock. The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, the high and low sales prices reported by the New York Stock Exchange.

As of March 9, 2004, there were 28,120,340 shares of our common stock issued and outstanding that were held by 15 stockholders of record. There were no sales of unregistered securities during the fourth quarter of 2003. On March 9, 2004, the last reported sale price of our common stock on the New York Stock Exchange was $17.68 per share.

We have not paid any dividends in the past and currently do not expect to pay cash dividends or make any other distributions in the future. We expect to retain our future earnings, if any, for use in the operation and expansion of our business. Any future determination to pay dividends will be at the discretion of our board of directors and will depend upon our financial condition, results of operations, capital requirements and such other factors as our board deems relevant. In addition, our ability to declare and pay dividends on our common stock is subject to covenants in our revolving credit facility. See “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Liquidity and Capital Resources.”

In November 2002, our board of directors approved a stock repurchase program authorizing us to repurchase up to $100 million of our common stock on the open market at prevailing market prices from time to time through December 2003. Stock repurchases are subject to prevailing market conditions and other considerations, including limitations under applicable securities laws. Under the terms of the program we repurchased 5,154,200 shares at an average purchase price of $14.29 per share, or an aggregate of $73.7 million, including 3,076,100 shares repurchased during 2003 at an average share price of $12.51 per share, or an aggregate of $38.5 million.

On October 16, 2003, we completed a tender offer for an aggregate of $180 million, or approximately 10 million shares of our common stock and certain employee stock options. In connection with the tender offer, we amended our current credit facility. The amended credit facility provides for, among other things, a $75 million secured revolving facility, letter of credit sub-facility and swing-line facility and a new $130 million secured term loan facility maturing in October 2008. The tender offer was financed with a new $130 million term loan under our amended credit facility, $15 million of borrowings from our amended revolving credit facility and $35 million of cash on hand. We also incurred approximately $4.4 million in transaction costs associated with the tender offer and the amendment of the credit facility, which were funded with cash on hand.

16

Table of Contents

Item 6.    Selected Consolidated Financial and Operating Data

The selected financial and operating data presented below should be read in conjunction with “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and “Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplemental Data” appearing elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Our statements of operations data for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001, and the balance sheet data at December 31, 2003 and 2002 are derived from, and are qualified by reference to, the audited financial statements included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. The statements of operations data for the years ended December 31, 2000 and 1999 and the balance sheet data at December 31, 2001, 2000 and 1999 are derived from our audited financial statements that do not appear herein. Our historical results are not necessarily indicative of our results of operations to be expected in the future.

17

Table of Contents

18

Table of Contents

Item 7.    Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The following discussion should be read in conjunction with, and is qualified in its entirety by, our consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto and other financial information included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Certain statements in this “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” are “forward-looking statements.” See “Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements” below.

Overview

We are a leading temporary healthcare staffing company and the largest nationwide provider of travel nurse staffing services. We recruit nurses and allied health professionals, our “temporary healthcare professionals,” nationally and internationally and place them on temporary assignments of variable lengths at acute care hospitals and healthcare facilities throughout the United States.

For the year ended December 31, 2003, we recorded revenue of $714.2 million, as compared to revenue of $775.7 million and $517.8 million for the years ended December 31, 2002 and 2001, respectively. The number of temporary healthcare professionals on assignment averaged 7,113, 7,783, and 5,964 in 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively. We recorded net income of $37.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2003, as compared to net income of $52.4 million and a net loss of ($4.4) million for the years ended December 31, 2002 and 2001, respectively. The increase in revenue and net income since 2001 is indicative of our expansion of our existing brands, improvements in contract terms with our hospital and healthcare facility clients, and our acquisitions of Healthcare Resource Management Corporation, “HRMC,” in April 2002 and O’Grady-Peyton International (USA), Inc., “OGP,” in May 2001. During 2003, however, we experienced changes in hospital staffing patterns, which led to a reduction in temporary healthcare professionals on assignment, revenue and net income. See additional discussion in “Results of Operations” below.

We derive substantially all of our revenue from fees paid directly by hospitals and healthcare facilities rather than from payments by government or other third parties. We enter into two types of contracts with our hospital and healthcare facility clients: flat rate contracts and payroll contracts. Under a flat rate contract, the temporary healthcare professional becomes an employee of the hospital or healthcare facility and is placed on their payroll. We bill the hospital or healthcare facility a “flat” weekly rate to compensate us for providing recruitment, housing and travel services. Alternatively, under a payroll contract, the temporary healthcare professional is our employee. We then bill our hospital or healthcare facility client at an hourly rate to compensate us for the temporary healthcare professional’s wages and benefits, as well as for recruitment, housing and travel services. Our clients generally prefer payroll contracts because this arrangement eliminates significant employee and payroll administrative burdens for them. Temporary healthcare professional wages and benefits billed under a payroll contract effectively represent a pass-through cost component for us and we are compensated by our clients for our value-added services. While payroll contracts generate more gross profit than flat rate contracts, the gross margin generated is lower due to the pass-through of the temporary healthcare professional’s compensation costs. Over the past five years, we, and the industry as a whole, have migrated towards a greater utilization of payroll contracts. During 2003, approximately 94% of our contracts with our hospital and healthcare facility clients were payroll contracts.

Since 1998 we have completed five strategic acquisitions. We acquired Medical Express, Inc. in November 1998, which strengthened our presence in the Pacific Northwest and Mountain states. During 2000, we completed the acquisitions of NursesRx, Inc. in June and Preferred Healthcare Staffing, Inc. in November, which strengthened our presence in the Eastern and Southern regions of the United States. We completed our acquisition of OGP in May 2001, the leading recruiter of registered nurses from English-speaking foreign countries for placement in the United States. We completed our fifth acquisition in April 2002, acquiring HRMC, to add to our presence in the Eastern and Southern regions of the United States. Each of these acquisitions has been accounted for by the purchase method of accounting. Therefore, the operating results of the acquired

19

Table of Contents

entities are included in our results of operations commencing on the date of acquisition of each entity. As a result, our results of operations following each acquisition may not be comparable with our prior results.

At the completion of our initial public offering in November 2001, options to purchase 5,182,000 shares of our common stock that we previously granted to members of our management immediately vested. These options had an average exercise price of $12.45, which was below the initial public offering price of $17.00 per share. As a result, we recorded approximately $18.8 million of non-cash stock-based compensation expense in the fourth quarter of 2001, of which $18.7 million was related to these options. In addition, we also recorded $13.1 million of non-cash stock-based compensation expense in the first three quarters of 2001 and $22.4 million for 2000. We also retired all of our indebtedness (approximately $145.2 million) with the proceeds from and upon the completion of our initial public offering. The retirement of debt resulted in a loss on extinguishment of debt of approximately $8.3 million, which was related to the write-off of the unamortized discount on our senior subordinated notes and unamortized deferred financing costs and loan fees.

On October 16, 2003, we completed a tender offer for an aggregate of $180 million, or approximately 10 million shares of our common stock and certain employee stock options. In connection with the tender offer, we amended our current credit facility. The amended credit facility provides for, among other things, a $75 million secured revolving facility, letter of credit sub-facility and swing-line facility and a new $130 million secured term loan facility maturing in October 2008. The tender offer was financed with a new $130 million term loan under our amended credit facility, $15 million of borrowings from our amended revolving credit facility and $35 million of cash on hand. We also incurred approximately $4.4 million in transaction costs associated with the tender offer and the amendment of the credit facility, which were funded with cash on hand.

Recent Trends

From 1996 through 2000, the temporary healthcare staffing industry grew at a compound annual growth rate of approximately 13%, and this growth accelerated to a compound annual growth rate of approximately 21% from 2000 to 2002. Over the last year, the demand for temporary healthcare professionals has declined due to a number of factors. In particular, we believe hospitals have increased their nurse recruitment efforts, stretched the productivity of permanent staff and maximized the cost-effectiveness of outsourced staffing solutions. In addition, because of the recent economic conditions, we believe permanent staff at our hospital and healthcare facility clients have been more likely to work overtime and less likely to leave their positions, creating fewer vacancies and fewer opportunities for us to place our temporary healthcare professionals.

The number of temporary healthcare professionals on assignment for the year decreased 9% from an average of 7,783 in 2002 to an average of 7,113 in 2003. Additionally, during the fourth quarter of 2003, we had an average of 6,339 temporary healthcare professionals on assignment. As a result of this decline, revenue and net income decreased throughout 2003. Demand for our services stabilized from April 2003 through October 2003, and has increased since then, throughout many regions. We believe that this increase in the number of orders placed by our hospital and healthcare facility clients is a result of increased hospital admissions growth and legislation impacting healthcare staffing throughout the United States, such as the California nurse staffing ratios that went into effect in January 2004. In addition, we believe signs of an improving economy and our increased focus on our hospital and healthcare facility clients have driven the recent increase in demand. We believe we will continue to experience a lag between when changes in demand occur and when our operations processes translate into changes in the number of temporary healthcare professionals on assignment and our financial results. Therefore, the changes in demand experienced in our industry could also result in continued changes in revenue and net income in subsequent quarters, and it is uncertain whether the recent increase in demand will drive increases in the average number of temporary healthcare professionals on assignment.

Critical Accounting Principles and Estimates

We have identified the following critical accounting policies that affect the more significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements. The preparation of our financial

20

Table of Contents

statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect our reported amounts of assets and liabilities, revenue and expenses, and related disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities. On an on-going basis, we evaluate our estimates, including those related to asset impairment, accruals for self-insurance and compensation and related benefits, allowance for doubtful accounts and contingencies and litigation. These estimates are based on the information that is currently available to us and on various other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results could vary from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.

We believe that the following critical accounting policies affect the more significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements:

21

Table of Contents

Results of Operations

The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, certain statements of operations data as a percentage of revenue. Our results of operations are reported as a single business segment.

Comparison of Results for the Year Ended December 31, 2003 to the Year Ended December 31, 2002

Revenue.    Revenue decreased 8%, from $775.7 million for 2002 to $714.2 million for 2003. This decrease is consistent with the decrease in the number of temporary healthcare professionals on assignment, which decreased 9% from an average of 7,783 for 2002 to an average of 7,113 for 2003. Of the $61.5 million decrease, approximately $66.9 million was attributable to the contraction in our existing brands through a decline in the average number of temporary healthcare professionals on assignment and a shift in the mix from payroll to flat rate contracts, offset by improvements in contract terms with our hospital and healthcare facility clients, representing an organic contraction of our recurring operations of 9%. The average number of temporary healthcare professionals on assignment in our existing brands declined 9% and contributed approximately $72.2 million to the decrease, and a shift in the mix from payroll to flat rate contracts contributed approximately $12.4 million. These decreases were partially offset by improvements in contract terms in our existing brands, which included increases in bill rates charged to hospital and healthcare facility clients, of approximately $17.8 million. The remainder of the offsetting increase in revenue, $5.4 million, was attributable to the results of HRMC, which we acquired in April 2002.

Cost of Revenue.    Cost of revenue decreased 6%, from $586.9 million for 2002 to $552.1 million for 2003. Of the $34.8 million decrease, approximately $39.0 million was attributable to the organic decline of our existing brands, offset by an approximately $4.2 million increase attributable to the operations of HRMC.

22

Table of Contents

Gross Profit.    Gross profit decreased 14%, from $188.8 million for 2002 to $162.2 million for 2003, representing gross margins of 24.3% and 22.7%, respectively. The decrease in the gross margin was primarily attributable to increased compensation, insurance and housing costs as a percentage of revenue.

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses.    Selling, general and administrative expenses decreased 5%, from $97.7 million for 2002 to $92.5 million for 2003. The $5.2 million decrease was primarily attributable to reductions in the allowance for doubtful accounts due to favorable collections, reductions in employee expenses related to the decline in the average number of temporary healthcare professionals on assignment and reductions in professional services. These decreases were partially offset by increased advertising and insurance expenses due to an increase in our professional liability reserve, increased expenses as a result of our acquisition of HRMC and a $1.2 million charge in the fourth quarter of 2003 related to vested stock options purchased in our October 2003 tender offer.

Non-Cash Stock-Based Compensation.    We recorded non-cash compensation charges of $0.9 million in each of 2002 and 2003 in connection with our stock option plans to reflect the difference between the fair market value at the measurement date and the exercise prices of previously issued stock options, which are amortized over their respective vesting periods.

Amortization and Depreciation Expense.    Amortization expense of $0.4 million was consistent for 2002 and 2003, as there were no significant changes in the carrying values of intangible assets subject to amortization. Depreciation expense increased from $3.5 million for 2002 to $4.4 million for 2003. The increase was primarily attributable to internally developed software placed into service in 2002, amortization of assets acquired under capital leases, and depreciation of leasehold improvements and assets acquired and placed in service in association with the consolidation of several San Diego, California locations into our new corporate headquarters during the second half of 2003.

Transaction Costs.    Transaction costs of $0.1 million for 2002 represent non-capitalized costs incurred in connection with the acquisition of HRMC.

Other Expense (Income), Net.    Interest expense (income), net, was income of $0.3 million for 2002 as compared to expense of $2.3 million for 2003, due primarily to the liquidation of investments held in 2002, interest charges related to the amendment of our revolving credit facility in October 2003, and the amortization of deferred financing costs associated with our debt issuance.

Income Tax Expense.    Income tax expense decreased from $34.3 million for 2002 to $23.9 million for 2003, reflecting effective income tax rates of 39.5% and 38.7% for these periods, respectively. The reduction in the effective income tax rate was primarily attributable to changes in the state tax provision.

Comparison of Results for the Year Ended December 31, 2002 to the Year Ended December 31, 2001

Revenue.    Revenue increased 50%, from $517.8 million for 2001 to $775.7 million for 2002. The number of temporary healthcare professionals on assignment increased 31% from an average of 5,964 for 2001 to an average of 7,783 for 2002. Of the $257.9 million increase, approximately $232.7 million was attributable to expansion of our existing brands through growth in the number of temporary healthcare professionals and improvements in contract terms with our hospital and healthcare facility clients, representing an organic growth rate for our recurring operations of 45%. The total number of temporary healthcare professionals on assignment in our existing brands grew 26% and contributed approximately $136.5 million to the increase. Improvements in contract terms included increases in bill rates charged to hospital and healthcare facility clients that accounted for approximately $79.2 million of this increase, and a shift in the mix of payroll versus flat rate temporary healthcare professional contracts that accounted for approximately $17.0 million of this increase. The remainder of the increase, $25.2 million, was attributable to the results of OGP and HRMC, which we acquired in May 2001 and April 2002, respectively.

23

Table of Contents

Cost of Revenue.    Cost of revenue increased 51%, from $388.3 million for 2001 to $586.9 million for 2002. Of the $198.6 million increase, approximately $180.8 million was attributable to the organic growth of our existing brands, and approximately $17.8 million was attributable to the operations of OGP and HRMC.

Gross Profit.    Gross profit increased 46%, from $129.5 million for 2001 to $188.8 million for 2002, representing gross margins of 25.0% and 24.3%, respectively. The decrease in the gross margin was primarily attributable to a larger pass-through of price increases in the form of benefits for our temporary healthcare professionals, as compared to 2001, and a shift in the mix of temporary healthcare professionals from flat rate contracts to payroll contracts.

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses.    Selling, general and administrative expenses increased 37%, from $71.5 million for 2001 to $97.7 million for 2002. Of the $26.2 million increase, approximately $5.1 million was attributable to increased expenses as a result of our acquisitions of OGP and HRMC. The remaining increase of $21.1 million was primarily attributable to increases in administrative and office expenses, marketing, information systems development, recruiting and nurse professional development in support of the growth in temporary healthcare professionals under contract from 2001 to 2002.

Non-Cash Stock-Based Compensation.    We recorded non-cash compensation charges of $31.9 million in 2001 and $0.9 million in 2002 in connection with our stock option plans to reflect the difference between the fair market value at the measurement date and the exercise price of previously issued stock options. The decrease was attributable to options to purchase 5,182,000 shares of our common stock that we previously granted to members of our management that immediately vested upon the completion of our initial public offering in 2001. These options had an average exercise price $12.45 per share below the initial public offering price of $17.00 per share and, as a result, we recorded approximately $31.8 million of non-cash stock-based compensation expense in 2001 related to these options. The 2002 expense amount related to the amortization of the intrinsic value of 2001 option grants to members of our management over their vesting period of four years.

Amortization and Depreciation Expense.    Amortization expense decreased from $5.6 million for 2001 to $0.4 million for 2002. This decrease was primarily attributable to the adoption of SFAS No. 142, effective January 1, 2002, under which goodwill amortization ceased. Depreciation expense increased from $2.2 million for 2001 to $3.5 million for 2002. The increase was primarily attributable to internally developed software placed into service in 2001 and furniture and equipment purchased to support our recent and anticipated growth.

Transaction Costs.    Transaction costs of $2.0 million for 2001 related to the termination of an advisory agreement in conjunction with our initial public offering. Transaction costs of $0.1 million for 2002 related to the non-capitalized costs incurred in connection with the acquisition of HRMC.

Other Expense (Income), Net.    Interest expense (income), net, was expense of $13.9 million for 2001 as compared to income of $0.3 million for 2002. Of the $14.2 million change, approximately $13.9 million was attributable to the retirement of all of our indebtedness (approximately $145.2 million) with the proceeds from and upon the completion of our initial public offering in November 2001. The $8.3 million loss on extinguishment of debt for 2001 was related to the write-off of unamortized discount on our senior subordinated notes and unamortized deferred financing costs and loan fees resulting from the early extinguishment of our existing indebtedness, and a prepayment premium resulting from the early extinguishment of the senior subordinated notes.

Income Tax (Expense) Benefit.    Income tax expense increased from a $1.3 million benefit for 2001 to a $34.3 million expense for 2002, reflecting effective income tax rates of 23.3% and 39.5% for these periods, respectively. The difference between the effective tax rate in 2001 and our expected effective tax rate for that year of 41% was primarily attributable to the effect of various permanent tax difference items, the impact of which is magnified by the reduction in pre-tax income created by the non-cash stock-based compensation charge.

24

Table of Contents

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Historically, our primary liquidity requirements have been for acquisitions, working capital requirements and debt service under our credit facility. We have funded these requirements through internally generated cash flow and funds borrowed under our existing credit facility. On October 2, 2003, we amended our credit agreement to provide for a new $130 million term loan to finance our tender offer and to extend the maturity date of the credit facility (including our new $75 million secured revolving credit facility) to October 2008. At December 31, 2003, $138.9 million was outstanding under this term loan and credit facility. We believe that cash generated from operations and available borrowings under our revolving credit facility will be sufficient to fund our operations for the next 12 months. We expect to be able to finance future acquisitions either with cash provided from operations, borrowings under our revolving credit facility, bank loans, debt or equity offerings, or some combination of the foregoing. The following discussion provides further details of our liquidity and capital resources.

Operating Activities:

Historically, our principal working capital need has been for accounts receivable. Our Days Sales Outstanding (“DSO”) have generally ranged between approximately 58 and 62 days. At December 31, 2002, our DSO was 61 days and at December 31, 2003, our DSO was 68 days. The increase in DSO compared to the prior year is primarily related to the temporary delay in client billings associated with the upgrade of our payroll and billing system in November 2003. Our principal sources of cash to fund our working capital needs are cash generated from operating activities and borrowings under our revolving credit facility. Net cash provided by operations increased $8.2 million from $56.9 million in 2002 to $65.1 million in 2003. This increase in net cash provided by operations was primarily related to a reduction in receivables due to the decrease in revenue for 2003 compared to 2002 offset by a decrease in net income.

Investing Activities:

We continue to have relatively low capital investment requirements, exclusive of costs associated with our new corporate headquarters occupied in August 2003 and our implementation of an upgraded payroll and billing software system in November 2003. Capital expenditures were $4.5 million, $4.3 million and $13.0 million in 2001, 2002 and 2003, respectively. In 2003, our capital expenditures were $6.3 million for purchased and internally developed software and $6.7 million for computers, furniture and equipment, leasehold improvements and other expenditures, including $5.8 million related to the consolidation of several San Diego, California locations into our new corporate headquarters. We expect our capital expenditure requirements to be similar in the future, other than costs related to our new corporate headquarters and our upgraded payroll and billing software system. See “Item 2. Properties.”

Our business acquisition expenditures were $13.0 million in 2001, $9.5 million in 2002, and $0 in 2003. During 2000, we completed the acquisitions of NursesRx and Preferred Healthcare Staffing and in May 2001, we acquired OGP. In April 2002, we completed the acquisition of HRMC. These acquisitions were financed through a combination of bank debt and equity investments, except for HRMC, which was financed with cash provided by operations. In connection with our acquisition of NursesRx, we made a $3.0 million payment to the former shareholders, consisting of two payments of $1.0 million each made prior to December 31, 2002 and a final installment of $1.0 million paid on June 30, 2003, in accordance with the terms of the agreement.

Financing Activities:

In November 2002, our board of directors approved a stock repurchase program authorizing us to repurchase up to $100 million of our common stock on the open market at prevailing market prices from time to time through December 2003. Stock repurchases are subject to prevailing market conditions and other considerations, including limitations under applicable securities laws. Under the terms of the program we repurchased 5,154,200 shares at an average purchase price of $14.29 per share, or an aggregate of $73.7 million,

25

Table of Contents

including 3,076,100 shares repurchased during 2003 at an average share price of $12.51 per share, or an aggregate of $38.5 million.

On October 16, 2003, we completed a tender offer for an aggregate of $180 million, or approximately 10 million shares of our common stock and certain employee stock options. In connection with the tender offer, we amended our current credit facility. The amended credit facility provides for, among other things, a $75 million secured revolving credit facility, letter of credit sub-facility and swing-line facility and a new $130 million secured term loan facility maturing in October 2008. The tender offer was financed with a new $130 million term loan under our amended credit facility, $15 million of borrowings from our amended revolving credit facility and $35 million of cash on hand. We also incurred approximately $4.4 million in transaction costs associated with the tender offer and the amendment of the credit facility, which were funded with cash on hand.

The revolving credit facility contains a letter of credit sub-facility and a swing-line loan sub-facility. The revolving credit facility carries an unused fee of 0.5% per annum, and there are no mandatory reductions in the revolving commitment under the revolving credit facility. Borrowings under this revolving credit facility bear interest at floating rates based upon either a LIBOR or a prime interest rate option selected by us, plus a spread, to be determined based on our leverage ratio. Amounts available under our revolving credit facility may be used for working capital, acquisitions and general corporate purposes, subject to various limitations.

The five year, $130 million term loan portion of our credit facility is subject to quarterly amortization of principal (in equal installments), with an amount equal to 1.15% of the initial aggregate principal amount of the facility payable quarterly beginning June 30, 2004 until 2008 with any remaining amounts payable in 2008. We are required to maintain interest rate protection on at least 50% of the term loan portion of our credit facility until January 1, 2006. On October 17, 2003 we entered into interest rate swap arrangements to minimize our exposure to interest rate fluctuations on $110 million of our outstanding variable rate debt under the new credit facility. We have formally documented the hedging relationships and account for these arrangements as cash flow hedges.

Our amended and restated credit agreement stipulates a minimum fixed charge coverage ratio, a maximum leverage ratio and other customary covenants.

Contractual Obligations.

The following table summarizes the effect that minimum debt, lease and other material non-cancelable commitments listed below are expected to have on our cash flow in the future periods set forth below (in thousands):

26

Table of Contents

Off-Balance Sheet and Other Financing Arrangements

At December 31, 2003 and 2002, we did not have any relationships with unconsolidated entities or financial partnerships, such as entities often referred to as structured finance, variable interest or special purpose, which would have been established for the purpose of facilitating off-balance-sheet arrangements or other contractually narrow or limited purposes. In addition, we do not engage in trading activities involving non-exchange traded contracts. As such, we are not materially exposed to any financing, liquidity, market or credit risk that could arise if we had engaged in such relationships. We do not have relationships or transactions with persons or entities that derive benefits from their non-independent relationship with us or our related parties other than what is disclosed in “Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data—Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—Note 11.”

Potential Fluctuations in Quarterly Results and Seasonality

Due to the regional and seasonal fluctuations in the hospital patient census of our hospital and healthcare facility clients and due to the seasonal preferences for destinations by our temporary healthcare professionals, the number of temporary healthcare professionals on assignment, revenue and earnings are subject to moderate seasonal fluctuations. Many of our hospital and healthcare facility clients are located in areas that experience seasonal fluctuations in population, such as Florida and Arizona, during the winter and summer months. These facilities adjust their staffing levels to accommodate the change in this seasonal demand and many of these facilities utilize temporary healthcare professionals to satisfy these seasonal staffing needs.

Historically, the number of temporary healthcare professionals on assignment has increased during January through March, followed by declines or minimal growth during April through August. During September through November, our temporary healthcare professional count has historically increased, followed by a decline in December. The historical seasonality of revenue and earnings may not continue due to the recent changes in the demand from our hospital and healthcare facility clients. As a result of all of these factors, results of any one quarter are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for any other quarter or for any year.

Inflation

Although inflation has abated during the last several years, the rate of inflation in healthcare related services continues to exceed the rate experienced by the economy as a whole. Our contracts typically provide for an annual increase in the fees paid to us by our clients based on increases in various inflation indices allowing us to pass on inflation costs to our clients. Historically, these increases have generally offset the increases in costs incurred by us.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In April 2002, the Financial Accounting Standards Board, or “FASB,” issued SFAS No. 145, Rescission of FASB Statements No. 4, 44 and 64, Amendment of FASB Statement No. 13, and Technical Corrections. SFAS No. 145 rescinds SFAS No. 4, which required all gains and losses from the extinguishment of debt to be aggregated and, if material, classified as an extraordinary item, net of the related income tax effect. The Company adopted SFAS No. 145 in 2003, and has reclassified an extraordinary loss recorded in 2001 on extinguishment of debt of $5,455,000, net of tax benefit of $2,810,000, accordingly. See “Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data—Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—Note 8.” Adoption of the provisions of SFAS No. 145 did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In April 2003, the FASB issued SFAS No. 149, Amendment of SFAS No. 133 on Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities. SFAS No. 149 amends and clarifies accounting for derivative instruments, including certain derivative instruments embedded in other contracts, and for hedging activities under SFAS No. 133. The amendments set forth in SFAS No. 149 change financial reporting by requiring that contracts with comparable

27

Table of Contents

characteristics be accounted for similarly. SFAS No. 149 is generally effective for contracts entered into or modified after June 30, 2003 (with a few exceptions) and for hedging relationships designated after June 30, 2003. The guidance is to be applied prospectively. In conjunction with the financing of the tender offer, on October 17, 2003 the Company entered into interest rate swap arrangements to minimize the Company’s exposure to fluctuations in interest rates on $110 million of its outstanding variable rate debt under the amended credit facility. The Company has formally documented the hedging relationships and accounts for these arrangements as cash flow hedges. Adoption of the provisions of SFAS No. 149 did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

This Annual Report on Form 10-K contains “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. We based these forward-looking statements on our current expectations and projections about future events. Our actual results could differ materially from those discussed in, or implied by, these forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are identified by words such as “believe,” “anticipate,” “expect,” “intend,” “plan,” “will,” “may” and other similar expressions. In addition, any statements that refer to expectations, projections or other characterizations of future events or circumstances are forward-looking statements. The following factors could cause our actual results to differ materially from those implied by the forward-looking statements in this Annual Report:

Other factors that could cause actual results to differ from those implied by the forward-looking statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K are more fully described in the “Risk Factors” section and elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. We undertake no obligation to update the forward-looking statements in this filing. References in this Annual Report on Form 10-K to “AMN Healthcare,” the “Company,” “we,” “us” and “our” refer to AMN Healthcare Services, Inc. and its wholly owned subsidiaries.

Risk Factors

The following risk factors should be read carefully in connection with evaluating us and the forward-looking statements contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Any of the following risks could materially adversely

28

Table of Contents

affect our company, operating results, financial condition and the actual outcome of matters as to which forward- looking statements are made in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Certain statements in “Risk Factors” constitute “forward-looking statements.” Our actual results could differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements as a result of certain factors and uncertainties set forth below and elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. See “Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements.”

If we are unable to attract qualified nurses and other allied healthcare professionals for our healthcare staffing business at reasonable costs, it could increase our operating costs and negatively impact our business.

We rely significantly on our ability to attract and retain nurses and other allied healthcare professionals who possess the skills, experience and licenses necessary to meet the requirements of our hospital and healthcare facility clients. We compete for healthcare staffing personnel with other temporary healthcare staffing companies and with hospitals and healthcare facilities. We must continually evaluate and expand our temporary healthcare professional network to keep pace with our hospital and healthcare facility clients’ needs. Currently, there is a shortage of qualified nurses in most areas of the United States, competition for nursing personnel is increasing, and salaries and benefits have risen. We may be unable to continue to increase the number of temporary healthcare professionals that we recruit, decreasing the potential for growth of our business. Our ability to attract and retain temporary healthcare professionals depends on several factors, including our ability to provide temporary healthcare professionals with assignments that they view as attractive and to provide them with competitive benefits and wages. We cannot assure you that we will be successful in any of these areas. The cost of attracting temporary healthcare professionals and providing them with attractive benefit packages may be higher than we anticipate and, as a result, if we are unable to pass these costs on to our hospital and healthcare facility clients, our profitability could decline. Moreover, if we are unable to attract and retain temporary healthcare professionals, the quality of our services to our hospital and healthcare facility clients may decline and, as a result, we could lose clients.

We operate in a highly competitive market and our success depends on our ability to remain competitive in obtaining and retaining hospital and healthcare facility clients and temporary healthcare professionals.

The temporary healthcare staffing business is highly competitive. We compete in national, regional and local markets with full-service staffing companies and with specialized temporary staffing agencies. Some of our larger competitors in the temporary nurse staffing sector include Cross Country, InteliStaf/StarMed, Nursefinders, Medical Staffing Network and On Assignment. In addition, we compete with staffing organizations owned by national healthcare facilities that provide staffing services to their member hospitals. Some of these companies may have greater marketing and financial resources. We believe that the primary competitive factors in obtaining and retaining hospital and healthcare facility clients are identifying qualified healthcare professionals for specific job requirements, providing qualified employees in a timely manner, pricing services competitively and effectively monitoring employees’ job performance. We compete for temporary healthcare professionals based on the quantity, diversity and quality of assignments offered, compensation packages and the benefits that we provide. Competition for hospital and healthcare facility clients and temporary healthcare professionals may increase in the future and, as a result, we may not be able to remain competitive. To the extent competitors seek to gain or retain market share by reducing prices or increasing marketing expenditures, we could lose revenue or hospital and healthcare facility clients and our margins could decline, which could seriously harm our operating results and cause the price of our stock to decline. In addition, the development of alternative recruitment channels could lead our hospital and healthcare facility clients to bypass our services, which would also cause revenue and margins to decline.

Our business depends upon our ability to secure and fill new orders from our hospital and healthcare facility clients because we do not have long-term agreements or exclusive contracts with them.

We generally do not have long-term agreements or exclusive guaranteed order contracts with our hospital and healthcare facility clients. The success of our business is dependent upon our ability to continually secure

29

Table of Contents

new orders from hospitals and other healthcare facilities and to fill those orders with our temporary healthcare professionals. Our hospital and healthcare facility clients are free to place orders with our competitors and choose to use temporary healthcare professionals that our competitors offer them. Therefore, we must maintain positive relationships with our hospital and healthcare facility clients. If we fail to maintain positive relationships with our hospital and healthcare facility clients or are unable to provide a cost-effective staffing solution, we may be unable to generate new temporary healthcare professional orders and our business may be adversely affected.

The demand for our services, and therefore the profitability of our business, may be adversely affected by changes in the staffing needs or staffing preferences of our healthcare facility clients, and by fluctuations in patient occupancy at our client healthcare facilities.

Demand for our temporary healthcare staffing services is significantly affected by the staffing needs and preferences of our healthcare facility clients, as well as by the general level of patient occupancy at our client healthcare facilities. Our healthcare facility clients may choose to use temporary staff, additional overtime from their permanent staff or add new permanent staff in order to address fluctuations in their staffing needs. As occupancy decreases, healthcare facility clients typically will reduce their use of temporary staff before reducing the workload or undertaking layoffs of their regular employees. In addition, we may experience more competitive pricing pressure during periods of occupancy downtown. Occupancy at our client healthcare facilities also fluctuates due to the seasonality of some elective procedures. We are unable to predict the level of patient occupancy or the staffing preferences of our clients at any particular time and their effect on revenue and earnings.

Healthcare reform could negatively impact our business opportunities, revenue and margins.

The federal government has undertaken efforts to control growing healthcare costs through legislation, regulation and voluntary agreements with medical care providers and drug companies. In the recent past, Congress has considered several comprehensive healthcare reform proposals. The proposals were generally intended to expand healthcare coverage for the uninsured and reduce the growth of total healthcare expenditures. While Congress did not adopt any comprehensive reform proposals, members of Congress may raise similar proposals in the future. If any of these proposals are approved, hospitals and other healthcare facilities may react by spending less on healthcare staffing, including nurses. If this were to occur, we would have fewer business opportunities, which could have a material adverse effect on our business.

State governments have also attempted to control the growth of healthcare costs. For example, Massachusetts has implemented a regulation that limits the hourly rate paid to temporary nursing agencies for registered nurses, licensed practical nurses and certified nurses aides. While we are exempt from this regulation, in part, if similar regulations were to be applied to our contracts in other states in which we operate, revenue and margins could decrease.

Furthermore, third party payors, such as health maintenance organizations, increasingly challenge the prices charged for medical care. Failure by hospitals and other healthcare facilities to obtain full reimbursement from those third party payors could reduce the demand or the price paid for our services.

We operate in a regulated industry and changes in regulations or violations of regulations may result in increased costs or sanctions that could reduce revenue and profitability.

The healthcare industry is subject to extensive and complex federal and state laws and regulations related to professional licensure, conduct of operations, payment for services and payment for referrals.

Our business is generally not subject to the extensive and complex laws that apply to our hospital and healthcare facility clients, including laws related to Medicare, Medicaid and other federal and state healthcare programs. However, these laws and regulations could indirectly affect the demand or the prices paid for our services. For example, our hospital and healthcare facility clients could suffer civil and/or criminal penalties and/ or be excluded from participating in Medicare, Medicaid and other healthcare programs if they fail to comply

30

Table of Contents

with the laws and regulations applicable to their businesses. In addition, our hospital and healthcare facility clients could receive reduced reimbursements, or be excluded from coverage, because of a change in the rates or conditions set by federal or state governments. In turn, violations of or changes to these laws and regulations that adversely affect our hospital and healthcare facility clients could also adversely affect the prices that these clients are willing or able to pay for our services.

We are subject to certain laws and regulations applicable to healthcare staffing agencies and general temporary staffing services. Like all employers, we must also comply with various regulations relating to pay practices, workers compensation and immigration; because of the nature of our business, the impact of a change in these regulations may have a more pronounced effect on our business. In addition, if we fail to comply with these laws and regulations, damages, civil and/or criminal penalties, injunctions and/or cease and desist orders may be imposed.

Significant legal actions could subject us to substantial liabilities.

In recent years, our hospital and healthcare facility clients have become subject to an increasing number of legal actions alleging malpractice or related legal theories. Because our temporary healthcare professionals provide medical care, claims may be brought against our temporary healthcare professionals and us relating to the quality of medical care provided by our temporary healthcare professionals while on assignment at our hospital and healthcare facility clients. We and our temporary healthcare professionals are at times named in these lawsuits regardless of our contractual obligations or the standard of care provided by our temporary healthcare professionals. In some instances, we are required to indemnify hospital and healthcare facility clients contractually against some or all of these potential legal actions. Also, because most of our temporary healthcare professionals are our employees, we may be subject to various employment claims and contractual disputes regarding the terms of a temporary healthcare professional’s employment.

We maintain insurance coverage through insurance carriers as well as self-insure for these claims through accruals for retention reserves. Our insurance coverage and reserve accruals may not be sufficient to cover all claims against us, and we may be exposed to substantial liabilities. We provide our healthcare professionals with individual professional liability policies with policy limits of $1 million per occurrence and $6 million in the aggregate. In addition, we have a general and professional liability policy with a $5 million retention and policy limits of $5 million and an excess policy of $5 million. We may experience increased insurance costs and reserve accruals and may not be able to pass on all or any portion of increased insurance costs to our hospital and healthcare facility clients.

We may be legally liable for damages resulting from our hospital and healthcare facility clients’ improper treatment of our traveling healthcare personnel.

Because we are in the business of placing our temporary healthcare professionals in the workplaces of other companies, we are subject to possible claims by our temporary healthcare professionals alleging discrimination, sexual harassment and other similar activities by our hospital and healthcare facility clients. We maintain a policy for employee practices coverage. However, the cost of defending such claims, even if groundless, could be substantial and the associated negative publicity could adversely affect our ability to attract and retain qualified individuals in the future.

We may not be able to successfully complete the integration of our acquisitions.

We continue to explore strategic acquisition opportunities. Acquisitions involve significant risks and uncertainties, including difficulties integrating acquired personnel and other corporate cultures into our business, the potential loss of key employees or customers of acquired companies, the assumption of liabilities and exposure to unforeseen liabilities of acquired companies and the diversion of management attention from existing operations. We may not be able to fully integrate the operations of the acquired businesses with our own in an efficient and cost-effective manner.

31

Table of Contents

Difficulties in maintaining our management information and communications systems may result in increased costs that reduce our profitability.

Our ability to deliver our staffing services to our hospital and healthcare facility clients and manage our internal systems depends to a large extent upon the performance of our management information and communications systems, including our implementation of an upgraded payroll and billing software system in November 2003. If these systems do not adequately support our operations, or if we are required to incur significant additional costs to maintain or expand these systems, our business and financial results could be materially adversely affected.

Our operations may deteriorate if we are unable to continue to attract, develop and retain our sales personnel.

Our success is dependent upon the performance of our sales personnel, especially regional client service directors, hospital account managers and recruiters. The number of individuals who meet our qualifications for these positions is limited and we may experience difficulty in attracting qualified candidates. In addition, we commit substantial resources to the training, development and support of these individuals. Competition for qualified sales personnel in the line of business in which we operate is strong and there is a risk that we may not be able to retain our sales personnel after we have expended the time and expense to recruit and train them.

The loss of key senior management personnel could adversely affect our ability to remain competitive.

We believe that the success of our business strategy and our ability to operate profitably depends on the continued employment of our senior management team. Other than Steven Francis, none of our senior management team has an employment contract with us. If members of our senior management team become unable or unwilling to continue in their present positions, our business and financial results could be materially adversely affected.

Our existing majority stockholder controls us.

HWH Capital Partners, L.P. and some of its affiliates, whom we refer to collectively as the “HWP stockholders,” beneficially currently own approximately 46.0% of the outstanding shares of our common stock. As a result, the HWP stockholders have significant influence in electing our directors and approving any action requiring the approval of shareholders, including any amendments to our certificate of incorporation, mergers or sales of all or substantially all of our assets. This concentration of ownership also may delay, defer or even prevent a change in control of our company, and make some transactions more difficult or impossible without the support of these stockholders. These transactions might include proxy contests, tender offers, mergers or other purchases of common stock that could give our stockholders the opportunity to realize a premium over the then-prevailing market price for shares of our common stock.

We have a substantial amount of goodwill on our balance sheet. Our level of goodwill may have the effect of decreasing our earnings or increasing our losses.

As of December 31, 2003, we had $135.5 million of unamortized goodwill on our balance sheet, which represents the excess of the total purchase price of our acquisitions over the fair value of the net assets acquired. At December 31, 2003, goodwill represented 44% of our total assets.

Through December 31, 2001, we amortized goodwill on a straight-line basis over the estimated period of future benefit of 25 years. In July 2001, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued SFAS No. 141, Business Combinations, and SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets. SFAS No. 141 requires that the purchase method of accounting be used for all business combinations initiated after June 30, 2001, as well as all purchase method business combinations completed after June 30, 2001. SFAS No. 142 requires that,

32

Table of Contents

subsequent to January 1, 2002, goodwill not be amortized but rather that it be reviewed annually for impairment. In the event impairment is identified, a charge to earnings would be recorded. We have adopted the provisions of SFAS No. 141 and SFAS No. 142. Although it does not affect our cash flow, an impairment charge to earnings has the effect of decreasing our earnings or increasing our losses, as the case may be. If we are required to record an impairment charge relating to goodwill, our stock price could be adversely affected.

Item 7A.    Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure about Market Risk

Market risk is the risk of loss arising from adverse changes in market rates and prices, such as interest rates, foreign currency exchange rates and commodity prices. We do not believe that we have any material market risk exposure with respect to derivative or other financial instruments.

During 2002, our primary exposure to market risk related to interest rates on short-term investments. A 1% change in the interest rates on short-term investments would have resulted in interest income fluctuating by approximately $102,000 in 2002.

During 2003, our primary exposure to market risk was interest rate risk associated with our debt instruments and short-term investments. See “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis—Liquidity and Capital Resources—Financing Activities” for further description of our debt instruments.” A 1% change in interest rates on variable rate debt would have resulted in interest expense fluctuating approximately $329,000 in 2003.

Our international operations create exposure to foreign currency exchange rate risks. We believe that our foreign currency risk is immaterial.

33

Table of Contents

Item 8.    Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

34

Table of Contents

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS’ REPORT

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of AMN Healthcare Services, Inc. and subsidiaries (the Company), as of December 31, 2003 and 2002, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity and comprehensive income, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2003. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of AMN Healthcare Services, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2003 and 2002, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2003, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

As discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company adopted the provisions of SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, and accordingly, changed its method of accounting for goodwill in 2002.

KPMG LLP

35

Table of Contents

AMN HEALTHCARE SERVICES, INC.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(in thousands, except par value)

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

36

Table of Contents

AMN HEALTHCARE SERVICES, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(in thousands, except per share amounts)