Back to GetFilings.com

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

(Mark One)

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003

OR

For the transition period from                  to                 .

Commission File Number: 0-19582

OLD DOMINION FREIGHT LINE, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

500 Old Dominion Way

Thomasville, NC 27360

(Address of principal executive offices)

(336) 889-5000

(Registrant’s Telephone Number)

www.odfl.com

(Registrant’s Web Site)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

Common Stock ($.10 par value)

(Title of class)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of the registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 12b-2). Yes x No ¨

The aggregate market value of voting stock held by nonaffiliates of the registrant as of June 30, 2003, was $187,479,940.

As of March 8, 2004, the registrant had 16,059,352 outstanding shares of Common Stock ($.10 par value).

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

Portions of the Company’s Proxy Statement for the 2004 Annual Meeting of Shareholders are incorporated by reference into Part III of this report.

PART I

General

We are a leading less-than-truckload (“LTL”) multi-regional motor carrier providing timely one to five day service among five regions in the United States and next-day and second-day service within these regions. Through our four branded product groups, OD-Domestic, OD-Expedited, OD-Global and OD-Technology, we offer an expanding array of innovative products and services. At year-end 2003, we provided full-state coverage to 27 of the 38 states that we serve directly within the Southeast, South Central, Northeast, Midwest and West regions of the country. Through marketing and carrier relationships, we also provide service to and from the remaining 12 states as well as international services around the globe. We plan to increase our direct coverage to 40 states and our full-state coverage to 28 states in the first half of 2004, as we continue to expand our markets. Old Dominion was founded in 1934, incorporated in Virginia in 1950 and begins its seventieth year of operations in 2004.

We have grown substantially over the last several years through strategic acquisitions and internal growth. Prior to 1995, we provided inter-regional service to major metropolitan areas from, and regional service within, the Southeast region of the United States. Since 1995, we have expanded our infrastructure to provide next-day and second-day service within four additional regions as well as expanded inter-regional service among those regions. During this period, we increased our number of service centers from 53 to 126 and our states directly served from 21 to 38. We believe that our present infrastructure will enable us to increase the volume of freight moving through our network, or freight density, and thereby improve our profitability.

We are committed to providing our customers with high quality service. We are continually upgrading our technological capabilities to improve our customer service, reduce our transit times and minimize our operating costs. In addition to our core less-than-truckload, or LTL, services, we provide premium expedited services, including guaranteed on-time delivery, time-specific delivery and airfreight services. We also offer container delivery service to and from nine port facilities as well as assembly and distribution services in which we either consolidate LTL shipments for full truckload transport by a truckload carrier or break down full truckload shipments from a truckload carrier into LTL shipments for our delivery.

We combine the rapid transit times of a regional carrier with the geographic coverage of an inter-regional carrier. We believe our transit times are generally faster than those of our principal national competitors, in part because of our more efficient service center network, use of team drivers and industry leading technology. In addition, our direct service to 38 states and five regions provides greater geographic coverage than most of our regional competitors. We believe our diversified mix and scope of regional and inter-regional services enable us to provide our customers a single source to meet their LTL shipping needs.

We provide consistent customer service from a single organization offering our customers information and pricing from one point of contact. Most of our multi-regional competitors that offer inter-regional service do so through independent companies with separate points of contact, which can result in inconsistent service and pricing, as well as poor shipment visibility. Our integrated structure allows us to offer our customers consistent and continuous service across all regions.

Our Industry

Trucks provide transportation services to virtually every industry operating in the United States and generally offer higher levels of reliability and faster transit times than other surface transportation options. The trucking industry is comprised principally of two types of motor carriers: truckload and LTL. Truckload carriers dedicate an entire trailer to one customer from origin to destination. LTL carriers pick up multiple shipments from multiple customers on a single truck and then route the goods through terminals, or service centers, where freight may be transferred to other trucks with similar destinations for delivery.

2

In contrast to truckload carriers, LTL carriers require expansive networks of local pickup and delivery service centers, as well as larger hub facilities. Significant capital is required of LTL motor carriers to create and maintain a network of service centers and a fleet of tractors and trailers. The substantial infrastructure spending needed for LTL carriers makes it difficult for new start-up or small operations to effectively compete with established companies.

Service Center Operations

At December 31, 2003, we conducted operations through 126 service center locations, of which we own 57 and lease 69. We operate major breakbulk, or hub, facilities in Atlanta, Georgia; Rialto, California; Des Plaines, Illinois; Indianapolis, Indiana; Greensboro, North Carolina; Harrisburg, Pennsylvania; Memphis, Tennessee; Morristown, Tennessee; and Dallas, Texas, while using some smaller service centers for limited breakbulk activity in order to serve next-day markets. Our service centers are strategically located in five regions of the country to provide the highest quality service and minimize freight rehandling costs.

Each of our service centers is responsible for the pickup and delivery of freight for its service area. All inbound freight received by the service center in the evening or during the night is scheduled for local delivery the next business day, unless a customer requests a different delivery schedule. Each service center loads the freight by destination the day it is picked up. Our management reviews the productivity and service performance of each service center on a daily basis in order to maximize quality service.

While we have established primary responsibility for customer service at the local service center level, our customers may access information through several different gateways such as our website, electronic data interchange, automated voice response systems, automated fax systems or through our customer service department located at our corporate office. Our systems offer direct access to information such as freight tracking, shipping documents, rate quotes, rate databases and account activity.

We plan to expand capacity at existing service centers as well as expand the number of service centers geographically as opportunities arise that provide for profitable growth and fit the needs of our customers.

Linehaul Transportation

Our Linehaul Transportation Department is responsible for directing the movement of freight among our service centers. Linehaul dispatchers control the movement of freight among service centers through real-time, integrated freight movement systems. We also utilize load-planning software to optimize efficiencies in our linehaul operations. Our senior management continuously monitors freight movements, transit times, load factors and other productivity measurements to ensure that we maintain our highest levels of service and efficiency.

We use scheduled dispatches, and additional dispatches as necessary, to meet our published service standards. In addition, we lower our cost structure by maintaining flexible work force rules and by using twin 28-foot trailers exclusively in our linehaul operations, which also reduces cargo claims expenses. Use of twin 28-foot trailers permits us to pick up freight directly from its point of origin to destination with minimal unloading and reloading, and twin trailers permit more freight to be hauled behind a tractor than could be hauled if we used one larger trailer.

Tractors, Trailers and Maintenance

At December 31, 2003, we operated 3,001 tractors. We generally use new tractors in linehaul operations for approximately three to five years and then transfer those tractors to pickup and delivery operations for the remainder of their useful lives. In a number of our service centers, tractors perform pickup and delivery functions during the day and linehaul functions at night to maximize tractor utilization.

At December 31, 2003, we operated a fleet of 11,443 trailers. As we have expanded and our needs for equipment have increased, we have purchased new trailers as well as trailers meeting our specifications from other trucking companies that have ceased operations. These purchases of pre-owned equipment, though providing an excellent value, have the effect of increasing the trailer fleet’s average age.

3

The table below reflects, as of December 31, 2003, the average age of our tractors and trailers:

We develop certain specifications for tractors and trailers, the production and purchase of which are negotiated with several manufacturers. These purchases are planned well in advance of anticipated delivery dates in order to accommodate manufacturers’ production schedules. We believe that there is sufficient capacity among suppliers to ensure an uninterrupted flow of equipment.

The table below sets forth our capital expenditures for tractors and trailers, excluding the acquisition of business assets in 2001, for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001:

We currently have major maintenance operations at our service centers in Los Angeles and Rialto, California; Atlanta, Georgia; Des Plaines, Illinois; Indianapolis, Indiana; Jersey City, New Jersey; Greensboro, North Carolina; Columbus, Ohio; Harrisburg, Pennsylvania; Morristown and Memphis, Tennessee; and Dallas, Texas. In addition, seven other service center locations are equipped to perform routine and preventive maintenance checks and repairs on our equipment.

We have an established scheduled maintenance policy and procedure. Linehaul tractors are routed to appropriate maintenance facilities at designated mileage or time intervals, depending upon how the equipment was utilized. Pickup and delivery tractors and trailers are scheduled for maintenance every 90 days.

Marketing and Customers

At December 31, 2003, we had a sales staff of 326 employees. We compensate our sales force, in part, based upon revenue generated, company and service center profitability and on-time service performance, which we believe helps to motivate our employees.

We utilize a computerized freight costing model to determine the price level at which a particular shipment of freight will be profitable. We can modify elements of this freight costing model, as necessary, to simulate the actual conditions under which the freight will be moved. We also compete for business by participating in bid solicitations. Customers generally solicit bids for relatively large numbers of shipments for a period of one to two years, and typically choose to enter into a contractual arrangement with a limited number of motor carriers based upon price and service.

Revenue is generated from many customers and locations across the United States and North America. We currently serve over 55,000 customers with 100% full-state coverage in 27 of the 38 states that we offer direct service. In addition, through marketing and carrier relationships, we provide service to the remaining 12 states, as well as international services around the globe. For the year ended December 31, 2003, our largest customer accounted for approximately 2.1% of revenue and our largest 20, 10 and 5 customers accounted for approximately 23.8%, 16.3% and 9.7% of our revenue, respectively. For each of the previous three years, less than 5% of our revenue was generated from international services. We believe the diversity of our revenue base helps protect our business from adverse developments in a single geographic region and the reduction or loss of business from a single customer.

4

Competition

The transportation industry is highly competitive on the basis of both price and service. We compete with regional, inter-regional and national LTL carriers and, to a lesser extent, with truckload carriers, small package carriers, airfreight carriers and railroads. We believe that we are able to compete effectively in our markets by providing high quality and timely service at competitive prices.

Seasonality

Our tonnage levels and revenue mix are subject to seasonal trends common in the motor carrier industry. Financial results in the first quarter are normally lower due to reduced shipments during the winter months. Harsh winter weather can also adversely impact our performance by reducing demand and increasing operating expenses. Freight volumes typically build to a peak in the third quarter and early fourth quarter, which generally result in improved operating margins.

Technology

We continually upgrade our technological capabilities. We provide access to our systems through multiple gateways that offer our customers maximum flexibility and immediate access to information. We also employ freight handling systems and logistics technology in an effort to reduce costs and transit times. Our principal technologies include:

5

Insurance

We carry significant insurance with third party insurance carriers and we self-insure a portion of this risk. We are self-insured for bodily injury and property damage claims up to $1,750,000 per occurrence. Cargo claims are self-insured up to $100,000. We also are self-insured for workers’ compensation in certain states and have first dollar or high deductible plans in the other states. The workers’ compensation retention levels for all states range from $250,000 to $1,000,000 depending on the plan year. Group health claims are self-insured up to $250,000 per occurrence and long-term disability claims are self-insured to a maximum per individual of $3,000 per month.

We believe that our policy of self-insuring up to set limits, together with our safety and loss prevention programs, is an effective means of managing insurance costs. We believe that our current insurance coverage is adequate to cover our liability risks.

Fuel Availability and Cost

Our industry depends heavily upon the availability of diesel fuel. We have not experienced difficulties in maintaining a consistent and ample supply of fuel. In periods of significant price increases, we have implemented a fuel surcharge to offset the additional cost of fuel, which is consistent with our competitors’ practices. However, from time to time, we experience shortages in the availability of fuel at certain locations and have been forced to incur additional expense to ensure adequate supply on a timely basis. Our management believes that our operations and financial condition are susceptible to the same fuel price increases or fuel shortages as those of our competitors. Fuel costs, including fuel taxes, averaged 8.2% of revenue in 2003. In response to fuel price fluctuations and to offset a portion of these additional costs, we implemented a fuel surcharge program in August 1999 that has remained in effect since that time.

Employees

As of December 31, 2003, we employed 7,513 individuals on a full-time basis in the following categories:

As of December 31, 2003, we employed 1,691 linehaul drivers and 2,145 pickup and delivery drivers. All of our drivers are selected based upon driving records and experience. Drivers are required to pass drug tests and have a current DOT physical and a valid commercial driver’s license prior to employment. Drivers are also required to take drug and alcohol tests periodically, by random selection.

To help fulfill driver needs, we offer qualified employees the opportunity to become drivers through the “Old Dominion Driver Training Program.” Since its inception in 1988, 1,396 individuals have graduated from this program, from which we have experienced an annual turnover rate of approximately 9%. In our management’s opinion, our driver training and qualification programs have been important factors in

6

improving our safety record. Drivers with safe driving records are rewarded with bonuses of up to $1,000 annually. Driver safety bonuses paid during 2003 were approximately $756,000.

Our management believes that relations with our employees are excellent and there are no employees represented under a collective bargaining agreement. We believe our non-union workforce gives us a significant advantage over unionized LTL carriers. Advantages of our workforce include flexible hours and the ability of our employees to perform multiple tasks, which we believe result in greater productivity, customer service, efficiency and cost savings. Management’s focus on communication and the continued education, development and motivation of our employees ensures that our relationship with our employees remains excellent.

Governmental Regulation

We are regulated by the Surface Transportation Board, an independent agency within the United States Department of Transportation, and by various state agencies. These regulatory authorities have broad powers, generally governing matters such as authority to engage in motor carrier operations, hours of service, certain mergers, consolidations and acquisitions, and periodic financial reporting. The trucking industry is subject to regulatory and legislative changes, such as increasingly stringent environmental and occupational safety and health regulations or limits on vehicle weight and size, ergonomics and hours of service. These changes may affect the economics of the industry by requiring changes in operating practices or by influencing the demand for, and the costs of providing services to, shippers.

The U.S. Department of Transportation issued new hours of service regulations for the transportation industry that became effective January 2, 2004. These new rules increased the number of hours our drivers can drive from 10 hours to a maximum of 11 hours and defined the maximum number of hours in a workday to 14 hours, measured from the driver’s initial start time. These regulations also increased the minimum required number of hours of rest between work periods from 8 hours to 10 hours. We believe this change will not have any material effect on our results of operations.

We believe that the cost of compliance with applicable laws and regulations neither has materially affected nor will materially affect our results of operations or financial condition.

Environmental Regulation

We are subject to various federal, state and local environmental laws and regulations that focus on, among other things, the emission and discharge of hazardous materials into the environment from our properties and vehicles, fuel storage tanks and the discharge or retention of storm water. Under specific environmental laws, we could also be held responsible for any costs relating to contamination at our past or present facilities and at third-party waste disposal sites. We do not believe that the cost of future compliance with environmental laws or regulations will have a material adverse effect on our operations or financial condition.

Risk Factors

In addition to the factors discussed elsewhere in this report, the following are some of the important factors that could cause our actual results to differ materially from those projected in any forward-looking statements:

We operate in a highly competitive industry, and our business will suffer if we are unable to adequately address potential downward pricing pressures and other factors that may adversely affect our operations and profitability.

Numerous competitive factors could impair our ability to maintain our current profitability. These factors include the following:

7

If our employees were to unionize, our operating costs would increase.

None of our employees are currently represented by a collective bargaining agreement. However, from time to time there have been efforts to organize our employees at various service centers. We have no assurance that our employees will not unionize in the future, which could increase our operating costs and force us to alter our operating methods. This could in turn have a material adverse effect on our operating results.

Difficulty in attracting drivers could affect our profitability.

Competition for drivers is intense within the trucking industry, and we periodically experience difficulties in attracting and retaining qualified drivers. Our operations may be affected by a shortage of qualified drivers in the future, which could cause us to temporarily under-utilize our truck fleet, face difficulty in meeting shipper demands and increase our compensation levels for drivers. If we encounter difficulty in attracting or retaining qualified drivers, our ability to service our customers and increase our revenue could be adversely affected.

Insurance and claims expenses could significantly reduce our profitability.

We are exposed to claims related to cargo loss and damage, property damage, personal injury, workers’ compensation, long-term disability and group health. We carry significant insurance with third party insurance carriers. The cost of such insurance has risen significantly. To offset, in part, the significant increases we have experienced, we have elected to increase our self-insured retention levels for most of our risk exposures. If the number or severity of claims for which we are self-insured increases, our operating results would be adversely affected. Insurance companies require us to obtain letters of credit to collateralize our self-insured retention. If these requirements increase, our borrowing capacity could be adversely affected.

Our business is subject to general economic factors that are largely out of our control.

Economic conditions may adversely affect our customers’ business levels, the amount of transportation services they need and their ability to pay for our services. Customers encountering adverse economic conditions represent a greater potential for loss, and we may be required to increase our reserve for bad-debt losses.

8

We have significant ongoing cash requirements that could limit our growth and affect our profitability if we are unable to obtain sufficient financing.

Our business is highly capital intensive. Our net capital expenditures in 2003 and 2002 were $98,441,000 and $69,105,000, respectively. We expect our capital expenditures for 2004 to be approximately $70,000,000 to $80,000,000. We depend on operating leases, lines of credit, secured equipment financing and cash flow from operations to finance the purchase of tractors, trailers and service centers. If we are unable in the future to raise sufficient capital or borrow sufficient funds to make these purchases, we will be forced to limit our growth and operate our trucks for longer periods of time, which could have a material adverse effect on our operating results.

In addition, our business has significant operating cash requirements. If our cash requirements are high or our cash flow from operations is low during particular periods, we may need to seek additional financing, which may be costly or difficult to obtain. We currently maintain an $80,000,000 unsecured line of credit with lenders consisting of Wachovia Bank, N.A.; Bank of America, N.A.; and Branch Banking and Trust Company that will expire in June 2006.

We may not realize additional revenues or profits from our infrastructure investments in a timely manner or at all.

We have invested, and expect to continue to invest, substantial amounts in building, expanding and upgrading service center facilities. If we are unsuccessful in our strategy for increasing our market share of LTL shipments, we may not realize additional revenues or profits from our infrastructure investments in a timely manner or at all.

We may be adversely impacted by fluctuations in the price and availability of fuel.

Fuel is a significant operating expense. We do not hedge against the risk of fuel price increases. Any increase in fuel taxes or fuel prices or any change in federal or state regulations that results in such an increase, to the extent not offset by freight rate increases or fuel surcharges to customers, or any interruption in the supply of fuel, could have a material adverse effect on our operating results. Historically, we have been able to offset significant increases in fuel prices through fuel surcharges to our customers, but we cannot be certain that we will be able to do so in the future. From time to time, we experience shortages in the availability of fuel at certain locations and have been forced to incur additional expense to ensure adequate supply on a timely basis.

Limited supply and increased prices for new equipment may adversely affect our earnings and cash flow.

Investment in new equipment is a significant part of our annual capital expenditures. We may face difficulty in purchasing new equipment due to decreased supply. The price of our equipment may be adversely affected in the future by regulations on newly manufactured tractors and diesel engines. See the discussion below: “We are subject to various environmental laws and regulations, and costs of compliance with, liabilities under, or violations of, existing or future environmental laws or regulations could adversely affect our business.”

We operate in a highly regulated industry, and increased costs of compliance with, or liability for violation of, existing or future regulations could have a material adverse effect on our business.

We are regulated by the Surface Transportation Board, an independent agency within the United States Department of Transportation, and by various state agencies. These regulatory authorities have broad powers, generally governing matters such as authority to engage in motor carrier operations, hours of service, certain mergers, consolidations and acquisitions, and periodic financial reporting. The trucking industry is subject to regulatory and legislative changes, such as increasingly stringent environmental and occupational safety and health regulations or limits on vehicle weight and size, ergonomics and hours of service. These changes may affect the economics of the industry by requiring changes in operating practices or by influencing the demand for, and the costs of providing services to, shippers.

9

We are subject to various environmental laws and regulations, and costs of compliance with, liabilities under, or violations of, existing or future environmental laws or regulations could adversely affect our business.

We are subject to various federal, state and local environmental laws and regulations regulating, among other things, the emission and discharge of hazardous materials into the environment from our properties and vehicles, fuel storage tanks and the discharge or retention of storm water. Under specific environmental laws, we could also be held responsible for any costs relating to contamination at our past or present facilities and at third-party waste disposal sites. Environmental laws have become and are expected to become increasingly more stringent over time, and there can be no assurance that our costs of complying with current or future environmental laws or liabilities arising under such laws will not have a material adverse effect on our business, operations or financial condition.

The Environmental Protection Agency has issued regulations that require progressive reductions in exhaust emissions from diesel engines through 2007. Beginning in October 2002, new diesel engines were required to meet these new emission limits. Some of the regulations require subsequent reductions in the sulfur content of diesel fuel beginning in June 2006 and the introduction of emissions after-treatment devices on newly-manufactured engines and vehicles beginning with model year 2007. These regulations could result in higher prices for tractors and diesel engines and increased fuel and maintenance costs. These adverse effects combined with the uncertainty as to the reliability of the vehicles equipped with the newly designed diesel engines and the residual values that will be realized from the disposition of these vehicles could increase our costs or otherwise adversely affect our business or operations.

Our results of operations may be affected by seasonal factors and harsh weather conditions.

Our operations are subject to seasonal trends common in the trucking industry. Our operating results in the first quarter are normally lower due to reduced demand during the winter months. Harsh weather can also adversely affect our performance by reducing demand and our ability to transport freight and increasing operating expenses.

If we are unable to retain our key employees, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be harmed.

The success of our business will continue to depend upon our executive officers, and we do not have employment agreements with any of them. The loss of the services of any of our key personnel could have a material adverse effect on us.

Our principal shareholders control a large portion of our outstanding common stock.

On March 9, 2004, Earl E. Congdon and John R. Congdon and members of their families and their affiliates beneficially owned 42.1% of the outstanding shares of our common stock. As long as the Congdon family controls a large portion of our voting stock, they will be able to significantly influence the election of the entire Board of Directors and the outcome of all matters involving a shareholder vote. The Congdon family’s interests may differ from yours.

We may not be able to continue to successfully execute our acquisition strategy, which could cause our business and future growth prospects to suffer.

Acquisitions have been and continue to be an important part of our growth strategy. However, suitable acquisition candidates may not be available on terms and conditions we find acceptable. In pursuing acquisitions, we compete with other companies, many of which have greater financial and other resources than we do to acquire attractive companies. Even if completed, the following are some of the risks associated with acquisitions that could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations:

10

Our business may be harmed by anti-terrorism measures.

In the aftermath of the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks on the United States, federal, state and municipal authorities have implemented and are continuing to implement various security measures, including checkpoints and travel restrictions on large trucks. If new security measures disrupt or impede the timing of our deliveries, we may fail to meet the needs of our customers or may incur increased expenses to do so. We cannot assure you that these measures will not have a material adverse effect on our operating results.

Our stock price may be volatile and could decline substantially.

Our common stock has experienced price and volume fluctuations. Many factors may cause the market price for our common stock to decline, including some of the risks enumerated above. In addition, if our operating results fail to meet the expectations of securities analysts or investors in any quarter or securities analysts revise their estimates downward, our stock price could decline.

In the past, companies that have experienced volatility in the market price of their stock have been the subject of securities class action litigation. If we become involved in a securities class action litigation in the future, it could result in substantial costs and diversion of management attention and resources, harming our business.

We own our general office located in Thomasville, North Carolina, consisting of a two-story office building of approximately 160,000 square feet on 23.6 acres of land. We also own service center facilities in Birmingham, Dothan and Huntsville, Alabama; Tucson, Arizona; Little Rock, Arkansas; Los Angeles and Rialto, California; South Windsor, Connecticut; Atlanta and Sylvester, Georgia; Jacksonville, Miami, Orlando and Tampa, Florida; Des Plaines and Rock Island, Illinois; Indianapolis, Indiana; Des Moines, Iowa; Kansas City, Kansas; Baltimore, Maryland; Boston, Massachusetts; Detroit, Michigan; Minneapolis, Minnesota; Tupelo, Mississippi; Syracuse, New York; Asheville, Charlotte, Fayetteville, Greensboro, Hickory, Wilmington and Wilson, North Carolina; Cincinnati and Columbus, Ohio; Oklahoma City, Oklahoma; Harrisburg and Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; Providence, Rhode Island; Charleston, Columbia and Greenville, South Carolina; Chattanooga, Memphis, Morristown and Nashville, Tennessee; Amarillo, Dallas, El Paso, Houston, Laredo, and Wichita Falls, Texas; Salt Lake City, Utah; Richmond, Manassas, Martinsville and Norfolk, Virginia; and Milwaukee, Wisconsin.

We also own non-operating properties in Jacksonville, Florida; Tupelo, Mississippi; St. Louis, Missouri; Fayetteville and Hickory, North Carolina; Memphis, Morristown, and Nashville, Tennessee; and two properties in Houston, Texas. All of these properties are held for lease. Currently, the St. Louis property is leased until February 2005; the Nashville property is leased until October 2004; the Tupelo property is leased until September 2004; the Hickory property is leased until June 2004; the Jacksonville property along with one of the two Houston properties is leased month-to-month; and the remaining Houston property along with the Fayetteville, Memphis, and Morristown properties are not under lease. In 2003, we purchased service center properties in Bakersfield, California; New Castle, Delaware; Sarasota, Florida; Lansing, Michigan; Minneapolis, Minnesota; Dayton and Youngstown, Ohio; La Crosse and

11

Wausau, Wisconsin. We plan to begin operations in these service centers during the first six months of 2004.

We lease 69 of our 126 service centers. These leased facilities are dispersed over the 38 states in which we operate in the Southeast, Northeast, Midwest, South Central and West regions of the country. The length of these leases ranges from month-to-month to a lease that expires in September 2009. We believe that as current leases expire, we will be able to renew them or find comparable facilities without incurring any material negative impact on service to customers or our operating results.

We believe that all of our properties are in good repair and are capable of providing the level of service required by current business levels and customer demands.

We are involved in various legal proceedings and claims that have arisen in the ordinary course of our business that have not been fully adjudicated. Many of these are covered in whole or in part by insurance. Our management does not believe that these actions, when finally concluded and determined, will have a significant adverse effect upon our financial position or results of operations.

None.

PART II

Common Stock and Dividend Information

Our common stock is traded on the Nasdaq National Market under the symbol ODFL. At January 30, 2004, there were approximately 2,600 holders of our common stock, including 131 shareholders of record. We did not pay any dividends on our common stock in fiscal year 2003 or 2002, and we have no current plans to declare or pay any dividends on our common stock in 2004. The information concerning restrictions on dividend payments required by Item 5 of Form 10-K appears in Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations under Item 7 of this report and Note 2 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Item 8 of this report.

On May 19, 2003, the Board of Directors approved a three-for-two common stock split for shareholders of record as of the close of business on June 4, 2003. On June 16, 2003, these shareholders received one additional share of common stock for every two shares owned.

The following table sets forth the high and low bid prices of our common stock for the periods indicated, adjusted where appropriate for the common stock split on June 16, 2003, as reported by the Nasdaq National Market:

12

SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

13

Overview

We are a leading less-than-truckload multi-regional motor carrier providing timely one to five day service among five regions in the United States and next-day and second-day service within these regions. Through our four branded product groups, OD-Domestic, OD-Expedited, OD-Global and OD-Technology, we offer an expanding array of innovative products and services. At year-end 2003, we provided full-state coverage to 27 of the 38 states that we serve directly within the Southeast, South Central, Northeast, Midwest and West regions of the country. Through marketing and carrier relationships, we also provide service to and from the remaining 12 states as well as international services around the globe. We plan to increase our direct coverage to 40 states and our full-state coverage to 28 states in the first half of 2004, as we continue to expand our markets.

Historically, over 90% of our revenue is derived from transporting LTL shipments for our customers, whose demand for our services is generally tied to the overall health of the U.S. domestic economy. We combine the rapid transit times of a regional carrier with the geographic coverage of an inter-regional carrier. We believe our transit times are generally faster than those of our principal national competitors and we are highly competitive with our principal regional competition.

In analyzing the components of our revenue, we monitor changes and trends in the following key metrics:

Our primary revenue focus is to increase shipment and tonnage growth within our existing infrastructure, generally referred to as increased density, thereby maximizing asset utilization and labor productivity. We measure density over many different functional areas of our operations including revenue per service center, linehaul load factor, pickup and delivery (“P&D”) stops per hour, P&D shipments per hour and platform pounds per hour. We believe continued improvement in density is a key component in our ability to sustain profitable growth.

The majority of direct costs associated with our business are driver and service center wages and benefits; operating supplies and expenses; and depreciation of our equipment fleet and service center facilities. We gauge our overall success in managing these costs by monitoring our operating ratio, a measure of profitability calculated by dividing total operating expenses by revenue, which also allows industry wide comparisons with our competition.

We continually upgrade our technological capabilities to improve our customer service and lower our operating costs. This technology provides our customers with visibility of their shipments throughout our systems, while providing key metrics from which we can monitor our processes.

14

We believe our non-union workforce gives us a significant advantage over our unionized LTL competition. Advantages of our workforce include flexible hours and the ability of our employees to perform multiple tasks, which we believe result in greater productivity, customer service, efficiency and cost savings. We focus on communication and the continued education, development and motivation of our employees to ensure that our relationships remain excellent.

Market fluctuations in the cost of key components of our cost structure, such as diesel fuel affect our profitability. Our tariffs and contracts generally provide for a fuel surcharge as diesel fuel prices increase above stated levels. We are also subject to market changes in insurance rates, and we continue to evaluate our balance of excess insurance coverage and self-insurance to minimize that cost.

Results of Operations

The following table sets forth, for the years indicated, expenses and other items as a percentage of revenue from operations:

2003 Compared to 2002

We produced a 17.8% increase in revenue in 2003 coupled with a 49.5% increase in net income for the year. Revenue increased to $667,531,000 from $566,459,000 in 2002, our second consecutive year of double-digit revenue growth and the eleventh in the thirteen years since our initial public offering in 1991. Our operating ratio decreased to 92.3% from 93.6% and net income for 2003 was $27,600,000 compared to $18,462,000 in 2002.

Most of our growth in 2003 can be attributed to market share gains in existing areas of our operations, which increased our density and resulted in lower incremental operating costs. Revenue per service center increased 13.7%, despite opening 9 additional service centers in 2003. These openings accounted for less that 4% of our increase in revenue in 2003, but enabled us to offer full-state coverage to all points in Arkansas, Louisiana and Missouri and increase our full-state coverage from 24 to 27 of the 38 states in which we provide direct service.

15

Our LTL shipments increased 12.9% over 2002 and LTL tonnage increased 12.1%, both indicators of increased market share and an improving domestic economy. We also continued to benefit from the September 2, 2002, bankruptcy of Consolidated Freightways, a major national LTL carrier and one of our competitors. Our average length of haul increased to 926 miles from 903 in 2002, which is consistent with the longer haul freight that became available after the closure of Consolidated Freightways.

LTL Revenue per LTL shipment increased to $148.59 from $141.04 in 2002, an increase of 5.4%. This was due to a combination of a 6.1% increase in LTL revenue per hundredweight, partially offset by a .8% decrease in weight per shipment. Approximately 48% of our revenue is generated from public tariffs, which are generally reviewed on an annual basis with the most recent general price increase occurring on July 3, 2003. The remaining revenue base is generated from contractual agreements, typically one to two years in length, which are renegotiated as they near expiration. While the average LTL weight per LTL shipment was lower in 2003, we have seen consecutive monthly increases in this measurement since April 2003 and we believe this is yet another indicator of an improving economic climate as our customers are moving larger shipments through our network.

Our tariffs and contracts generally provide for a fuel surcharge as diesel fuel prices increase above stated levels. This surcharge is recorded as additional revenue and is intended to offset significant fluctuations in the price of diesel fuel, which is one of the larger components of our operating supplies and expenses. Because of average higher fuel prices in 2003, the fuel surcharge increased to 4.4% of revenue from 3.1% in 2002.

The market share increases we experienced in 2003 generated operating efficiencies and productivity gains throughout our operations, which is reflected in a decrease in our operating ratio to 92.3% from 93.6% in 2002. The benefits of increased freight density was particularly evident in the reduction in salaries, wages and benefits, which decreased to 59.4% of revenue in 2003 from 60.2% in 2002.

P&D wages decreased to 11.9% of revenue from 12.4% in 2002. A portion of these savings resulted from the rollout of our driver hand-held computers, which was completed by year-end 2003. These handheld computers provide direct communication between our drivers, service center personnel and other Old Dominion systems, which results in more efficient routings of our P&D fleet and increased productivity. For the comparable years, P&D shipments handled per hour increased 3.1% and P&D wages per shipment decreased slightly, despite an average hourly wage increase of approximately 2.5%.

Platform wages decreased to 8.0% of revenue in 2003 from 8.2% for the prior year. This reduction was due to increased dock productivity partially due to the implementation of our Dock Yard Management system at most of our major facilities by year-end 2003. This system utilizes barcode technology to improve freight visibility throughout our systems and allow for faster and more efficient handling of freight. LTL weight per platform hour and LTL shipments per platform hour, both measures of dock productivity, increased 1.1% and 2.5%, respectively, in 2003 while platform wages per LTL hundredweight increased only 1.7% against an average hourly wage increase of 2.8%.

Reductions in P&D and platform wages were partially offset by an increase in linehaul wages to 12.1% of revenue from 12.0% in 2002. Linehaul miles increased 16.0%, due to increased business levels and a longer average length of haul, and average linehaul wages per mile increased 3.0%. Slight improvements in our linehaul load factor, the weight of shipments loaded onto trailers for each linehaul dispatch, was not sufficient to offset these additional costs.

Our fringe benefit costs increased to 27.0% of payroll in 2003 from 26.5% for the prior year due primarily to increases in workers’ compensation expenses. We self-insure workers’ compensation claims in a range between $250,000 and $1,000,000, depending upon the plan year and the state in which we are operating. We also carry excess coverage for claims in excess of these deductibles. In 2003, the combination of claims expense and insurance premiums was 3.9% of payroll compared to 3.2% in 2002, primarily due to anticipated settlement costs for our self-insured portion.

Diesel fuel costs, excluding fuel taxes, increased 41.7% over 2003 due to a 17.2% increase in consumption and increased costs per gallon. We currently do not use diesel fuel hedging instruments; therefore, we are subject to market price fluctuations. We believe that our fuel surcharges, which decrease or are eliminated as fuel prices approach base levels, have effectively offset the increases in diesel fuel prices in 2003.

16

Net capital expenditures in 2003 were $98,441,000, which included $45,456,000 for purchases of tractors and trailers in addition to $36,111,000 for purchases of service center facilities or capital improvements to existing service center facilities. These capital expenditures included the purchase of eleven service center facilities auctioned as a result of the September 2002 bankruptcy of Consolidated Freightways. As a result, depreciation and amortization expenses increased to 5.7% of revenue from 5.5% in 2002. As these properties replaced leased facilities, our building and office equipment rents decreased to 1.1% of revenue from 1.3% for the prior year.

Insurance and claims expense, primarily consisting of premiums and self-insured costs for auto liability and cargo claims, decreased to 2.6% of revenue in 2003 compared to 2.9% in 2002. Premiums for excess coverage above our self-insured retention levels generally increased over the prior year as a percentage of revenue. These additional costs were offset by favorable claims experience in our self-insured retention for both auto liability and cargo claims, resulting in a decline in our overall insurance costs in 2003.

Our revenue growth and density improvements in 2003 allowed us to successfully leverage other costs, including communication and utilities, general supplies and expenses, and miscellaneous expenses, which as a group declined to 5.5% of revenue from 6.5% in 2002. Expenses for uncollectible revenue, a component of miscellaneous expenses, decreased to .1% of revenue from .7% in 2002.

Interest expense for 2003, net of interest income, increased 6.5% to $6,111,000 from $5,736,000 in 2002. By year-end, we borrowed $14,000,000 on our line of credit and an additional $2,650,000 on other debt instruments; however, we made principal payments of $12,447,000 on outstanding debt during the year, resulting in net borrowings of $4,203,000 for 2003. Since average outstanding debt remained relatively constant for the comparable years, the increase in interest expense can be attributed to the decrease in the amount of interest that was capitalized in 2003, which was $178,000 compared to $699,000 in 2002.

Our effective tax rate for 2003 was 39.1% compared to 39.0% in 2002.

2002 Compared to 2001

In 2002, we achieved double-digit revenue growth, improved our operating efficiencies and increased our earnings at a faster rate than revenue growth. We achieved these objectives, even while the U.S. economy remained sluggish throughout the year, primarily by implementing our strategy of growing revenue in our existing areas of operation and improving asset utilization. Revenue for 2002 increased 12.8% to $566,459,000 compared to $502,239,000 in 2001. Our operating ratio improved to 93.6% from 95.1%, and net income improved to $18,462,000 for 2002, or 55.1% over net income for 2001 of $11,905,000.

Our revenue growth strategy was based upon increasing market share through improved service products, faster transit times and expanded coverage. Consistent with these objectives, we announced full-state coverage for the state of New Hampshire in June 2002, which increased the number of states that we provided 100% coverage to 24. While expansion plans are closely tied to the strength of the national economy, we seek to produce long-term profitable growth by positioning ourselves to expand significantly in stronger economic times and avoiding the risk of overextending ourselves in weaker economic cycles.

Revenue growth in 2002 was driven by an 11.8% increase in the number of shipments handled coupled with a .9% increase in revenue per shipment. The improvement in revenue per shipment resulted from a 2.2% increase in revenue per hundredweight, partially offset by a 1.3% decrease in weight per shipment. The improvement in revenue per hundredweight in 2002 was due more to a 3.0% increase in our average length of haul than to our ability to raise rates or maintain pricing, particularly in the first half of the year. Our average length of haul increased to 903 miles in 2002 from 877 miles in 2001.

A portion of our revenue growth in the second half of the year can be attributed to the increase in freight volume associated with the September 3, 2002 bankruptcy of Consolidated Freightways, a major national LTL carrier with annual revenues of $2.3 billion in 2001 and one of our competitors. While we experienced a 7.7% increase in shipments and a .4% decrease in revenue per shipment in the first half of the year, we gained a significant amount of momentum in the second half of the year as reflected by a 15.9% increase in shipments and a 2.0% improvement in revenue per shipment.

17

We also benefited from a full year of revenue and increased market share generated by the 13 additional service centers we opened in our South Central Area on February 10, 2001, when we acquired certain assets of Carter & Sons Freightways of Carrollton, Texas.

As a result of our market share improvements throughout our service center network, tonnage increased 10.3% in 2002 over 2001, enabling us to obtain certain economies of scale as we moved greater concentrations of shipments through our existing route structure and service center network. As a result, our incremental costs associated with this added volume were generally lower as reflected by the improvement in our operating ratio.

Salaries, wages and employee benefit expenses, the largest component of our cost structure, were 60.2% of revenue in 2002 compared to 61.0% in 2001. Most of these costs were incurred as variable driver and platform labor directly associated with the movement of shipments through our network. Our driver and platform wages, excluding benefit expenses, were 32.6% of revenue in 2002 compared to 33.0% for 2001.

The cost of providing group health benefits to our employees and their families decreased to 3.7% of revenue in 2002 from 4.3% in 2001. After experiencing a 24.5% increase in these costs in 2001, primarily due to significant increases in the cost of our prescription drug benefit, we identified cost savings opportunities that were implemented in January 2002. These changes were instrumental in reducing the rate of increase in our group health costs in 2002.

Purchased transportation expenses, which includes lease operator costs, purchased linehaul, local transportation services and equipment rentals, decreased to 3.3% of revenue in 2002 from 3.7% in 2001. When there are capacity restraints within our fleet or when it is economically beneficial, we purchase transportation services for our linehaul and local pickup and delivery operations from lease operators, other motor carriers and rail providers. In 2002, lease operator expenses decreased from 1.3% of revenue to 1.2%, purchased linehaul services increased to .4% of revenue from .2%, and purchased pickup and delivery services decreased to 1.5% from 1.9%. Equipment rentals decreased from .3% of revenue to .2% from the prior year. As we continue to expand our services and geographic coverage, we intend to decrease our use of purchased transportation and increase the utilization of our employees and equipment.

Fuel costs, including fuel taxes, decreased to 7.3% of revenue in 2002 from 7.8% in 2001. Our general tariffs and contracts generally include provisions for a fuel surcharge, recorded in net revenue, which have effectively offset significant diesel fuel price fluctuations. These surcharges decrease or are eliminated as fuel prices approach certain floor levels.

The adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, on January 1, 2002 resulted in a decrease in amortization expenses of $737,000 in 2002. In addition, we also increased our asset utilization as more tonnage moved through our service center network. As a result, depreciation and amortization expense dropped to 5.5% of revenue in 2002 from 6.0% for the prior year.

Insurance and claims expense increased to 2.9% of revenue in 2002 from 2.6% in 2001. On April 1, 2002, we renewed many of our major insurance policies at significantly higher renewal rates, even after substantially increasing our self-insured retention levels. These higher rates resulted from overall increases in insurance markets, which affect the entire transportation industry, rather than our specific loss experience.

Long-term debt, including current maturities, decreased 5.3% to $93,223,000 at December 31, 2002 compared to $98,422,000 at year-end 2001. While debt levels were higher throughout the first 11 months of 2002, we used $16,783,000 of the net $47,878,000 in proceeds from our underwritten public offering of stock completed in November 2002 to repay all indebtedness under our revolving line of credit and retire a senior note. Although our debt levels were higher in 2002, our weighted average interest rate on outstanding debt was lower, resulting in a decrease in interest expense to 1.0% of revenue from 1.2% in 2001. We capitalized $699,000 in interest charges in 2002 compared to $232,000 in 2001.

The effective tax rate for both 2002 and 2001 was 39.0%.

18

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Expansion in both the size and number of service center facilities, the planned tractor and trailer replacement cycle and revenue growth have required continued investment in real estate and equipment. In order to support these requirements, we incurred net capital expenditures of $98,441,000 during 2003. We funded these capital expenditures with $75,064,000 in cash generated from operating activities, $4,203,000 in net additional borrowings, $966,000 from stock issuances resulting from the exercise of stock options and $18,208,000 of our 2002 ending cash balance that remained from our November 2002 stock offering. At December 31, 2003, long-term debt including current maturities increased to $97,426,000 from $93,223,000 at December 31, 2002.

We estimate net capital expenditures to be approximately $70,000,000 to $80,000,000 for the year ending December 31, 2004. Of that, approximately $51,000,000 is allocated for the purchase of tractors and trailers; $15,000,000 is allocated for the purchase of service center facilities, construction of new service center facilities or expansion of existing service center facilities; $10,000,000 is allocated for investments in technology; and the balance is allocated for other assets. We plan to fund these capital expenditures primarily through cash flows from operations supplemented by additional borrowings.

The table below sets forth our net capital expenditures for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001:

On May 31, 2000, we entered into an uncollateralized committed credit facility with Wachovia Bank, N.A. (formerly First Union National Bank), which, as amended, consisted of a $20,000,000 line of credit and a $20,000,000 line to support standby letters of credit. This facility had a term of three years that expired on May 31, 2003, but was extended through July 1, 2003. Interest on this line of credit was charged at rates that varied based upon a certain financial performance ratio. The applicable interest rate for 2003 under this agreement was based upon LIBOR plus .60% to .70%. A fee ranging from .18% to .20% was charged on the unused portion of the line of credit, and fees ranging between .70% and .75% were charged on outstanding standby letters of credit.

We entered into an unsecured revolving credit agreement dated June 30, 2003 with lenders consisting of Wachovia Bank, N.A.; Bank of America, N.A.; and Branch Banking and Trust Company, with Wachovia as agent for the lenders. This three-year facility consists of $80,000,000 in line of credit commitments from the lenders, all of which are available for revolving loans. In addition, of that $80,000,000 line of credit, $30,000,000 may be used for letters of credit and $10,000,000 may be used for borrowings under Wachovia’s sweep program. The sweep program is a daily cash management tool that automatically initiates borrowings to cover overnight cash requirements up to an aggregate of $10,000,000 or initiates overnight investments for excess cash balances. Revolving loans under the facility will bear interest at either: (a) an applicable margin plus the higher of Wachovia’s prime rate or one-half of one percentage point over the federal funds rate (the “Adjusted Base Rate”); or (b) LIBOR plus an applicable margin (the “Adjusted LIBOR Rate”). The applicable margin will vary depending upon our ratio of adjusted debt to capital. In the case of the Adjusted Base Rate, the applicable margin will range from 0% to .25%. In the case of the Adjusted LIBOR Rate, the applicable margin will range from .75% to 1.25%. The applicable margin under this agreement for 2003 for the Adjusted Base Rate and the Adjusted LIBOR Rate was 0% and 1.0%, respectively. Revolving loans under the sweep program will bear interest at the aggregate rate applicable under the sweep program plus the Adjusted LIBOR Rate.

Quarterly fees ranging from .20% to .30% will be charged on the aggregate unused portion of the facility determined by our ratio of adjusted debt to capital. The applicable rate for the periods under this

19

agreement in 2003 was .25%. Quarterly fees will be charged on the aggregate undrawn portion of outstanding letters of credit at a rate ranging from .75% to 1.25%, which was 1.0% in 2003 as determined by our ratio of adjusted debt to capital. In addition, a quarterly facing fee at an annual rate of .125% was charged on the aggregate undrawn portion of outstanding letters of credit.

The new credit facility contains customary covenants, including financial covenants that require us to observe a maximum ratio of adjusted debt to capital, to maintain a minimum fixed charge coverage ratio and to maintain a minimum consolidated tangible net worth. Our wholly owned subsidiary guaranteed payment of all of our obligations under the facility. Future wholly owned subsidiaries would be required to guarantee payment of all of our obligations under the facility. At December 31, 2003, there was $14,000,000 outstanding on the line of credit facility and there was $19,403,000 outstanding on the standby letter of credit facility.

We have three senior note agreements outstanding totaling $70,821,000 at December 31, 2003. These notes call for periodic principal payments with maturities ranging from 2005 to 2008, of which $17,107,000 is due in 2004. Interest rates on these notes are fixed and range from 6.35% to 7.59%. Under the provisions of one of these notes, we may issue up to $15,000,000 of additional senior notes. The applicable interest rate and payment schedules for any new notes will be determined and mutually agreed upon at the time of issuance.

Our senior notes and credit agreement limit the amount of dividends that may be paid to shareholders pursuant to certain financial ratios. At December 31, 2003, our debt instruments limited the amount of dividends that could be paid to shareholders to $12,303,000. We did not declare or pay a dividend on our common stock in 2003, and we have no plans to declare or pay a dividend in 2004.

With the exception of the line of credit, interest rates are fixed on all of our debt instruments. Therefore, short-term exposure to fluctuations in interest rates is limited to our line of credit facility, which had an outstanding balance of $14,000,000 at December 31, 2003. We do not currently use interest rate derivative instruments to manage exposure to interest rate changes. Also, we do not use fuel hedging instruments, as our tariff provisions and contracts generally allow for fuel surcharges to be implemented in the event that fuel prices exceed stipulated levels.

A significant decrease in demand for our services could limit our ability to generate cash flow and affect profitability. Most of our debt agreements have covenants that require stated levels of financial performance, which if not achieved could cause acceleration of the payment schedules. We do not anticipate a significant decline in business levels or financial performance, and we believe the combination of our existing credit facilities along with our additional borrowing capacity will be sufficient to meet seasonal and long-term capital needs.

The following table summarizes our significant contractual obligations and commercial commitments as of December 31, 2003:

20

Critical Accounting Policies

In preparing our consolidated financial statements, we apply the following critical accounting policies that affect judgments and estimates of amounts recorded in certain assets, liabilities, revenue and expenses:

Revenue and Expense Recognition - Operating revenue is recognized on a percentage of completion method based on average transit time. Expenses associated with operating revenue are recognized when incurred.

Allowance for Uncollectible Accounts - We maintain an allowance for uncollectible accounts for estimated losses resulting from the inability of our customers to make required payments. If the financial condition of our customers were to deteriorate, resulting in an impairment of their ability to make payments, additional allowances may be required.

Claims and Insurance Accruals – Claims and insurance accruals reflect the estimated ultimate total cost of claims, including amounts for claims incurred but not reported, for cargo loss and damage, bodily injury and property damage, workers’ compensation, long-term disability and group health not covered by insurance. These costs are charged to insurance and claims expense except for workers’ compensation, long-term disability and group health, which are charged to employee benefits expense.

We are currently self-insured for bodily injury and property damage claims up to $1,750,000 per occurrence. Cargo loss and damage claims are self-insured up to $100,000. We are self-insured for workers’ compensation in certain states and have first dollar or high deductible plans in the remaining states with self-insured retention levels ranging from $250,000 to $1,000,000. Group health claims are self-insured up to $250,000 per occurrence and long-term disability claims are self-insured to a maximum per individual of $3,000 per month.

Insurers providing excess coverage above retention levels adjust their premiums to cover insured losses and for other market factors. As a result, we periodically evaluate our self-insured retention levels to determine the most cost efficient balance of self-insurance and excess coverage.

In establishing accruals for claims and insurance expenses, we evaluate and monitor each claim individually, and we use factors such as historical experience, known trends and third-party estimates to determine the appropriate reserves for potential liability. We believe the assumptions and methods used to estimate these liabilities are reasonable; however, changes in the severity of previously reported claims, significant changes in the medical costs and legislative changes affecting the administration of our plans could significantly impact the determination of appropriate reserves in future periods.

Goodwill - The excess cost over net assets acquired in connection with acquisitions, or goodwill, is recorded in “Other Assets”. We adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets (“SFAS 142”) on January 1, 2002 and completed the required analyses of the fair value of our single reporting unit compared to the carrying value as of January 1, 2002, October 1, 2002 and October 1, 2003. Based on those analyses, we concluded that there was no impairment of goodwill on those measurement dates. At December 31, 2003, goodwill totaled $10,648,000. Prior to the adoption of SFAS 142, these intangible assets were amortized using a straight-line method over their estimated useful lives of 3 to 25 years.

Property and Equipment – Property and equipment are recorded at cost and depreciated on a straight-line basis over their estimated economic lives. Management uses historical experience, certain assumptions and estimates in determining the economic life of each asset. Periodically, we review property and equipment for impairment to include changes in operational and market conditions, and we adjust the carrying value and economic life of any impaired asset as appropriate. Currently, estimated economic lives for structures are 5 to 30 years; revenue equipment is 2 to 12 years; other equipment is 2 to 10 years; and leasehold improvements are the lesser of 10 years or the life of the lease. The use of different assumptions, estimates or significant changes in the resale market for our equipment could result in material changes in the carrying value of our assets.

21

Inflation

Most of our expenses are affected by inflation, which generally results in increased operating costs. In response to fluctuations in the cost of petroleum products, particularly diesel fuel, we have implemented a fuel surcharge in our tariffs and contractual agreements. The fuel surcharge is designed to offset the cost of fuel above a base price and increases as fuel prices escalate over the base. For 2003, the net effect of inflation on our results of operations was minimal.

Related Party Transactions

Transactions with Old Dominion Truck Leasing, Inc.

Old Dominion Truck Leasing, Inc. (“Leasing”), a North Carolina corporation whose voting stock is owned by the Earl E. Congdon Intangibles Trust, David S. Congdon, Trustee, the John R. Congdon Revocable Trust and members of Earl E. Congdon’s and John R. Congdon’s families, is engaged in the business of purchasing and leasing tractors, trailers and other vehicles. John R. Congdon is Chairman of the Board of Leasing, and Earl E. Congdon is Vice Chairman of the Board of Leasing. Since 1986, we have combined our requirements with Leasing for the purchase of tractors, trailers, equipment, parts, tires and fuel. We believe that, by combining our requirements, we are often able to obtain pricing discounts because of the increased level of purchasing. While this is beneficial to us, our management believes that the termination of this relationship would not have a material adverse impact on our financial results.

For the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001, we charged Leasing $39,000, $14,000 and $11,000, respectively, for vehicle repair, maintenance and other services, which we provide to Leasing at cost plus a negotiated markup. In addition, we charged Leasing $12,000 annually in 2003, 2002 and 2001, for rental of a vehicle maintenance facility located in Chesapeake, Virginia. On March 15, 2003, we entered into an agreement to sublease a vehicle maintenance facility in South Bend, Indiana, to Leasing for which we charged $10,000 in 2003.

We purchased $266,000, $297,000 and $287,000 of maintenance and other services from Leasing in 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively. We believe that the prices we pay for such services are lower than would be charged by unaffiliated third parties for the same quality of work, and we intend to continue to purchase maintenance and other services from Leasing, provided that Leasing’s prices continue to be favorable to us. We did not lease any equipment from Leasing in 2003 and 2002, however, we paid Leasing $8,000 for short-term tractor rentals in 2001.

On January 4, 2002, we purchased 91 1997 model pickup and delivery trailers from Leasing for an aggregate purchase price of $774,000. We also purchased one trailer from Leasing on May 1, 2003 for a purchase price of $8,000.

Transactions with E & J Enterprises

On July 29, 2002, our Board of Directors approved the purchase of 163 trailers for $1,200 each, or a total of $195,600, from E & J Enterprises, a Virginia general partnership of which Earl E. Congdon, our Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of our Board of Directors, and John R. Congdon, Vice Chairman of our Board of Directors, are each 50% owners. These trailers had been leased to us by E & J Enterprises since 1988 pursuant to a term lease that converted to a month-to-month lease in 1999. At year-end 2002, we had completed the purchase of 50 of these trailers for a purchase price of $60,000. During the first quarter 2003, we continued to lease the remaining 113 trailers on a month-to-month basis until we completed the purchase of those trailers in March 2003 for a purchase price of $135,600. Also in March 2003, we purchased an additional 10 trailers from E & J Enterprises for $5,000 each for a total purchase price of $50,000.

On July 29, 2002, our Board of Directors also approved the leasing from E & J of 150 pickup and delivery trailers on a month-to-month basis for $204 per month for each trailer. On December 1, 2003, we purchased these 150 trailers for an aggregate purchase price of $907,000, thereby ending all lease activity with E & J Enterprises.

The total amount paid to E&J for all trailers under lease was $357,000, $387,000 and $401,000 for 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively.

22

In December 1988, we sold E & J certain tracts of unimproved land and a vacant service center facility in exchange for a receivable in the amount of $579,798. E & J has repaid the amount outstanding under the receivable as parcels of the property have been sold. In December 2003, E & J paid the remaining receivable balance of $195,677, which effectively ended this related party transaction.

Greensboro, NC Service Center Purchase

On October 15, 2002, we purchased a 116-door service center facility and shop located in Greensboro, N.C. for $6,000,000 from an irrevocable trust created for the benefit of the families of Earl E. Congdon, our Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of our Board of Directors, and John R. Congdon, Vice Chairman of our Board of Directors. Prior to October 15, 2002, this property was leased to us with payments totaling $285,000 and $380,000 in 2002 and 2001, respectively. The purchase of this property ended all related party transactions between this trust and the Company.

Disposition of Certain Split Dollar Life Insurance Policies

Prior to December 31, 2003, five split-dollar life insurance agreements to which we were a party terminated. Two of these agreements involved policies administered by Aurora Life Insurance Company. One policy insured the life of Earl E. Congdon and the second insured the life of John R. Congdon. Each policy was owned by the wife of the insured. The owners assigned their interests in the policies to us as payment in full for any obligations owed by them pursuant to the split dollar agreements. As a result of the assignments, we currently own both policies and currently hold them as key man life insurance on Earl. E. Congdon and John R. Congdon.

A third split-dollar agreement involved a policy administered by The Prudential Insurance Company of America insuring the joint lives of Earl E. Congdon and Kathryn Congdon. The policy was owned by Earl Congdon’s children. Under the Prudential split-dollar agreement, the owners had the right to terminate the split-dollar agreement upon payment to us of the total amount of premiums paid by us on the policy less any amounts previously reimbursed. In exercise of that right, the owners terminated the split-dollar agreement and paid to us $595,137. All of this amount represented premiums previously advanced on the insured’s behalf. We no longer own any interest in the Prudential policy.

The final two split-dollar agreements involved policies administered by American General Life of Houston, Texas. One policy insured the joint lives of Earl E. Congdon and Kathryn Congdon and the second insured the joint lives of Jack Congdon and Natalie Congdon. Each policy was owned by a family limited partnership. Under each American General split-dollar agreement, the owners had the right to terminate the split-dollar agreement upon payment to us of the total amount of premiums paid by us on the policy less any amounts previously reimbursed. In exercise of that right, the owner of the American General split-dollar agreement for Earl and Kathryn Congdon terminated that agreement and paid to us $1,367,678 and the owner of the American General split-dollar agreement for Jack and Natalie Congdon terminated that agreement and paid to us $1,373,626. All of these amounts represented premiums previously advanced on the insured’s behalf. We no longer own any interest in the American General policies.

Audit Committee Approval

The Audit Committee of our Board of Directors reviewed and approved all related party transactions.

Forward-Looking Information

Forward-looking statements in this report, including, without limitation, statements relating to future events or our future financial performance, appear in the preceding Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and in other written and oral statements made by or on behalf of us, including, without limitation, statements relating to our goals, strategies, expectations, competitive environment, regulation and availability of resources. Such forward-looking statements are made pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Investors are cautioned that such forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties that could cause actual events and results to be materially different from those expressed or implied herein, including, but not limited to, the risk factors detailed in this Annual Report.

23

The information required by Item 7A of Form 10-K appears in Item 7 of this report under the heading “Liquidity and Capital Resources”.

24

OLD DOMINION FREIGHT LINE, INC.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

25

OLD DOMINION FREIGHT LINE, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

26

OLD DOMINION FREIGHT LINE, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY