Back to GetFilings.com



Table of Contents

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

 


 

FORM 10-K

 

x    ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

For the Fiscal Year Ended September 30, 2003

 

¨    TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

    

For the Transition Period From                      to                     

 


 

Commission File Number 0-21484

 

TARANTELLA, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

CALIFORNIA   94-2549086

(State or other jurisdiction of

incorporation or organization)

 

(I.R.S. Employer

Identification No.)

 

425 Encinal Street, Santa Cruz, California   95060
(Address of principal executive offices)   (Zip Code)

 

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code (831) 427-7222

 

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None

 

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

Preferred Share Purchase Rights Common Stock, no par value

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes   ¨    No  x

 

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment.    ¨

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).    

Yes  ¨    No  x

 

The aggregate market value of the voting stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant, based upon the closing sale price of the Common Stock on December 31, 2003 was approximately $18,089,805. Shares of Common Stock held by each executive officer and director and by each person who owns 5% or more of the outstanding Common Stock have been excluded in that such persons may be deemed to be affiliates. This determination of affiliate status is not necessarily a conclusive determination for other purposes.

 

As of December 31, 2003, registrant had 15,279,271 shares of Common Stock outstanding.


 


Table of Contents

TARANTELLA, INC.

 

Form 10-K

For the Fiscal Year Ended September 30, 2003

Table of Contents

 

         Page
Number


Part I         
   

Item 1.       Business

   1
   

Item 2.       Properties

   8
   

Item 3.       Legal Proceedings

   8
   

Item 4.       Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

   8
Part II         
   

Item 5.       Market for Registrant’s Common Stock and Related Stockholder Matters

   9
   

Item 6.       Selected Financial Data

   10
   

Item 7.       Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of

                        Operations

   11
   

Item 7A.    Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

   26
   

Item 8.       Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

   28
   

Item 9.       Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial

                        Disclosures

   64
   

Item 9A.    Controls and Procedures

   64
Part III         
   

Item 10.     Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant

   65
   

Item 11.     Executive Compensation

   67
   

Item 12.     Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management

   73
   

Item 13.     Certain Relationships and Related Transactions

   74
   

Item 14.     Principal Accountant Fees and Services

   75
Part IV         
   

Signatures

   77
   

Item 15.     Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedule and Reports on Form 8-K

   78


Table of Contents

PART I

 

Item 1.    Business

 

Forward-Looking Statements

 

This report contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. The forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, statements concerning future liquidity and financing requirements, potential price erosion, plans to make acquisitions, dispositions or strategic investments, expectations of sales volume to customers, and plans to improve and enhance existing products and develop new products.

 

Certain information and statements contained in the “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and other sections of this report, including statements containing words such as “could”, “expects”, “may”, “anticipates”, “believes”, “estimates”, “plans”, and similar expressions, are forward-looking statements. The forward-looking statements of Tarantella, Inc. (also referred to as “Tarantella” or “The Company”) are subject to risks and uncertainties. Some of the factors that could cause future results to materially differ from the recent results or those projected in the forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, significant increases or decreases in demand for the Company’s products, increased competition, lower prices and margins, changes in customer buying patterns, failure to successfully develop and market new products and technologies, competitor introductions of superior products, continued industry consolidation, instability and currency fluctuations in international markets, product defects, failure to secure intellectual property rights, results of litigation, failure to retain and recruit key employees, adverse economic conditions, acts of war or global terrorism, and unexpected natural disasters.

 

Actual results could differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking report and those described in other reports under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Readers are referred to the “Sales and Distribution,” “Customer Support and Service”, “Product Development,” “Competition,” “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and sections contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, which identify some of the important factors or events that could cause actual results of performances to differ materially from those contained in the forward-looking statements.

 

The Company undertakes no obligation to update forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances occurring after the date of this Form 10-K.

 

Available Information

 

The Company’s website is http://www.tarantella.com. Through a link on the Investor Relations section of the website, the Company makes available the following filings as such reports become available on the Securities and Exchange Commission website: the Annual Report on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K, Section 16 filings (Form 4) and any amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The public may read and copy any materials filed with the SEC at the SEC’s Public Reference Room at 450 Fifth Street, N.W., Washington, D.C., 20549. The public may obtain information on the operation of the Public Reference Room by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. The SEC maintains an Internet site that contains reports, proxy and information statements and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC. The address of that site http://www.sec.gov. Information contained on the Company’s website is not part of this report.

 

Company Background

 

Tarantella is a leading provider of Internet infrastructure software that enables web-based access to enterprise applications from virtually any client device. Headquartered in Santa Cruz, California, Tarantella operates development centers in the United States, the United Kingdom and India with sales representatives in

 

1


Table of Contents

the U.S., U.K., Germany, Mexico, Canada, France, Spain and Italy. Tarantella products are sold through an integrated worldwide channel of Tarantella account executives, distributors, value-added resellers, systems integrators and computer and software manufacturers. Tarantella maintains exclusive distribution relationships in Japan as well as distribution and agent relationships in China, Northern and Southeast Asia. In total, Tarantella products are available through resellers in more than 30 countries.

 

The Company was incorporated in 1979 as a California Corporation under the name The Santa Cruz Operation (“SCO”), Inc. On May 4, 2001, SCO completed the sale of its Server Software and Professional Services Divisions to Caldera Systems, Inc., retaining the Tarantella Division. A new company, Caldera International, was formed which combined the assets acquired from SCO with the assets of Caldera Systems. Upon the completion of the sale, SCO changed its corporate name to Tarantella, Inc.

 

The company’s flagship product, Tarantella Enterprise 3, a UNIX/Linux-based application access suite, is installed in corporations and governmental agencies around the world. Tarantella Enterprise 3 was introduced to the marketplace in 2001. Earlier client integration products, which are part of the Vision2K Suite, were introduced in the late 1990s and are currently still available. In June 2003, Tarantella acquired New Moon Systems Inc, and added New Moon Canaveral iQ from Tarantella® to its product offering. Canaveral iQ is a Windows-based application access suite, intended for small to mid-sized business customers and departmental deployments with Windows-only infrastructure. In aggregate, Tarantella boasts over 12,000 customer sites including several of the most respected brands in the Forbes Magazine Global 2000.

 

Subsequent to the issuance of the Company’s consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2002, the three months ended December 31, 2002 and the three and six months ended March 31, 2003, the Company’s management determined that the accounting treatment initially afforded to certain transactions was not correct. As a result, the accompanying consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2002 have been restated.

 

The effects of the restatement are presented in note 2 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

Tarantella Mission and Vision: Managed, Secure, Adaptive Application Access

 

Tarantella’s vision is that application access will play an increasingly prominent role in a ubiquitously wired world. The Company believes server-based application hosting will be the most practical way of delivering applications to businesses, homes and mobile users regardless of time or location. Tarantella’s mission is to become the world’s leading provider of managed, secure and adaptive application access software for Global 2000 companies and government agencies.

 

Corporate Strategy

 

Tarantella’s strategy is to focus on the application access needs of Forbes Magazine Global 2000 firms and mobile service providers, and deliver purpose-built, non-invasive, non-disruptive infrastructure software solutions to meet the needs of new classes of users and applications, including new wireless applications, home information service providers and web services applications. From a sales perspective, Tarantella approaches its target market through its worldwide, integrated sales process, including direct sales, channel partners and strategic alliances.

 

Importance of Web-Based Application Access

 

Organizations today need secure, managed access to business-critical systems for employees, customers and partners. Mobile and remote worker numbers continue to grow and more companies are consolidating, often requiring diverse computer systems to work together immediately. Workers are dispersed, needing access to data from remote locations. Home workers and extended day workers require efficient, secure access to corporate data

 

2


Table of Contents

outside the office. The Internet offers a cost-effective and reliable way for businesses to gain access to their data. This method, however, brings with it an urgent need for high-level security and manageability.

 

Data Center disaster contingency plans must also allow for alternative user access modes when offices are no longer available. Valuable corporate information kept on desktops is at risk and companies need a centralized, managed business approach that is more cost-effective and secure.

 

Tarantella’s product offerings address global enterprises’ needs for remote and mobile access, flexible business continuance plans and provide ways to cut the high costs and risks of managing distributed desktop computers. Tarantella’s software suite is a powerful solution regardless of company size or platform environment.

 

Key Customer Benefits: Application Access and Server-Centric Computing

 

    Centralizes Information Technology (“IT”) systems for cost savings and ROI

 

    Facilitates distributed server consolidation

 

    Prolonges IT asset life—desktops, applications, servers, etc.

 

    Enables application access through leading web portal products

 

    Facilitates centralized management of intellectual property and data files

 

    Web-enables delivery of existing applications instantly without code rewrites

 

    Facilitates enhanced security and disaster recovery

 

    Delivers web-based application access and workforce mobility

 

Target Markets

 

Tarantella software products provide horizontal network infrastructure solutions, which are used across all types and sizes of companies. However, several target markets have emerged in which the Tarantella value proposition is particularly compelling, including large financial institutions, government agencies (federal, local, defense departments), utilities and telecommunications.

 

These enterprises generally employ heterogeneous or mixed information systems architectures, are often geographically dispersed with remote access requirements and are under operational pressures to reduce costs while optimizing a return on assets. Large companies with diverse application platforms and a widely distributed user base are an excellent fit for a Tarantella solution. The scalability and flexibility features of Tarantella’s software differentiate it from competitors who cannot scale to meet the demanding heterogeneous architectures of the largest enterprises.

 

Products Overview

 

Tarantella offers a comprehensive, server-centric computing product line serving a broad cross-section of customers. This is accomplished by market bifurcation and by addressing distinct customer segments with purpose-built software solutions: Tarantella Enterprise 3 and Canaveral iQ. As a result, Tarantella’s software solutions deliver the benefits of application access and server-centric computing to organizations with the simplest computing and network environments as well as to those with the largest and most complex.

 

Product Offerings

 

Tarantella’s product offerings include the flagship Tarantella Enterprise 3 software products, Canaveral iQ from Tarantella, as well as the established Vision2K Suite, as described below:

 

3


Table of Contents

Tarantella Enterprise 3

 

Tarantella Enterprise 3 is focused on organizations with large, heterogeneous and complex IT environments with overriding requirements for flexibility, scalability and application and data security. Tarantella Enterprise 3 customers generally have well-developed UNIX support infrastructure and capabilities. Tarantella’s patented technology was designed for the Internet and enterprise intranets. Tarantella’s Adaptive Internet Protocol (AIP) is designed to optimize the tradeoffs between bandwidth and application performance to give users the best possible experience over any speed connection.

 

The Tarantella architecture is based on a three-layer approach, whereby the Tarantella server sits in between the application layer (server) and the client layer (user). The non-intrusive nature of Tarantella Enterprise 3 allows installation in the network infrastructure without impacting existing applications or clients.

 

Tarantella Enterprise 3 software provides universal access to corporate applications, whether modern or legacy, including those that run on Microsoft® Windows®, UNIX®, Linux®, mainframe or midrange servers. With Tarantella Enterprise 3 software, users access applications remotely from a client device (anything from a thin client to a top-of-the-range PC). Users need only a web browser (such as a current version of Microsoft Internet Explorer or Netscape Navigator), with Java technology enabled. A native client version is also available to operate without a web browser. The centralized management capabilities of Tarantella Enterprise 3 scales to accommodate rapid corporate change, technological advancement and expanding remote access needs. The product can span global multi-site IT architectures, unifying and simplifying IT complexity and diversity, providing an enhanced level of business continuity via increased application availability.

 

Tarantella Enterprise 3’s elegant, three-tier “drop-in” architecture means there is no need to modify clients, networks, applications or the servers on which they run, making the software ideal for heterogeneous platform environments and large-scale deployment scenarios. Users access all applications through a single, unified and familiar web-based interface. Global resources are opened up without increasing vulnerability, change is managed rapidly and complex IT infrastructures can be simplified without major disruption, expensive development or costly administration.

 

Tarantella Enterprise 3 software enables users to access business applications over the network, without jeopardizing corporate security, affecting the end user, disrupting the existing infrastructure or requiring costly alternatives, such as a VPN. Tarantella Enterprise 3 software offers SSL security, encryption technology and firewall and proxy server traversal.

 

New Moon Canaveral iQ from Tarantella®

 

Canaveral iQ provides server-based computing for small to mid-sized companies and departments of larger companies that primarily use Microsoft Windows operating systems and platforms in their IT infrastructure. Canaveral iQ’s design focus is on simple installation and deployment, ease of administration and seamless integration with a Microsoft infrastructure. Canaveral iQ is a simple, intelligent and cost-effective application access solution for Microsoft based IT shops.

 

Canaveral iQ helps organizations fully leverage their investment in Microsoft infrastructure by extending the Windows Terminal Services capabilities available within Microsoft Windows Server 2000 and 2003. The software enhances Windows Terminal Services’ client experience by adding features like seamless windows, enhanced printing and file saving functionality, as well as application access through web-based browsers, Windows desktops or the Windows Start Menu. At the network level, Canaveral iQ enables Windows Terminal Services to more effectively scale to multiple servers and higher user counts by providing:

 

    Application-level load balancing

 

    Application, user and server provisioning

 

    Reporting and monitoring capabilities

 

4


Table of Contents

Canaveral iQ’s two-tier architecture easily integrates into existing Microsoft environments, providing an affordable solution to centralize the hosting of applications, both over a LAN or to remote users.

 

Vision2K UNIX Integration Products

 

Integrating the Windows and UNIX worlds, Tarantella’s established Vision2K software suite extends the power and dependability of UNIX servers to the Windows desktop environment and provides character-based and GUI access to UNIX applications.

 

The Vision2K Suite consists of:

 

    VisionFS—server based file and print sharing

 

    XVision Eclipse—fast access to X applications

 

    TermVision—terminal emulation for Windows and the Internet

 

    SuperVision—centralized management of users

 

    TermLite—lightweight terminal emulator

 

Competition

 

The Tarantella Enterprise 3 and Canaveral iQ software solutions face strong competition from a range of point products from companies that include Citrix Systems, Inc., Hummingbird Ltd., and Attachmate Corporation. For example, Citrix is the market leader in providing remote access to Windows applications, while Hummingbird and Attachmate are market leaders for UNIX and mainframes, respectively.

 

While each of these competitors is formidable in its own space, Tarantella offers an integrated approach, designed to meet enterprise requirements across the board. Tarantella software solutions address the various needs of specific customer segments, regardless of company size or IT sophistication. Additionally, Tarantella products often work alongside those of its competition as well.

 

The scalability and flexibility of the solution in heterogeneous and demanding architectures differentiates Tarantella Enterprise 3 from its competitors. Tarantella Enterprise 3 installs on all major UNIX and Linux platforms and delivers Windows, UNIX, Linux, Mainframe and web-based applications. Tarantella products can also be used in place of, or to augment, VPN or extranet products.

 

Canaveral iQ was designed expressly to satisfy the needs of small and medium-sized enterprises and departments of larger enterprises seeking a simple and cost-effective alternative to such products as Citrix’s Metaframe XP. Canaveral iQ seamlessly installs in an organization’s existing Microsoft infrastructure to host Windows-based client software on centralized Microsoft Windows servers.

 

Strategic Relationships

 

Strong industry partners augment the Tarantella enterprise value proposition. Sun Microsystems, Inc. and Microsoft Corporation are two of Tarantella’s most valued industry partners.

 

Tarantella Enterprise 3 software is Sun Tone Certified. Tarantella is a featured technology/development partner for Sun Ray, Java Desktop System, SPARC Solaris and the Java Enterprise Server. Sun Professional Services has a worldwide contract to resell Enterprise 3. Tarantella has a worldwide joint marketing agreement with Sun and has signed distribution agreements with some of the largest Sun distributors in the world including GE Access in the USA, Clarity in the UK and ICOS in Italy.

 

5


Table of Contents

Tarantella is a Microsoft Gold Certified ISV Partner and licensee of the RDP specification. Canaveral iQ from Tarantella is viewed as an important complement to Microsoft Windows Terminal Services. Canaveral iQ completes the Terminal Services experience for end users. Tarantella’s relationships with Microsoft span development and executive relationships in Redmond, Washington, to field sales and marketing relationships around the world.

 

Tarantella also has built strategic relationships with IBM, Oracle and Computer Associates. Additionally, Tarantella partners with a variety of thin client vendors as well as software and hardware vendors. The Technology Alliance Group, or TAG program, enforces the Company’s dedication to forging strong alliances with these vendors and a TAG certification ensures compatibility with either Enterprise 3 or Canaveral iQ. Members of the Tarantella TAG Program include: Aventail, Sun Microsystems, Neoware, Wyse, Fujitsu Siemens, CodeWeavers and Hewlett Packard. These strategic relationships, both new and ongoing, provide Tarantella additional credibility and leverage in selling to the enterprise market.

 

Sales and Distribution

 

Tarantella’s target customers comprise the Global 2000 and government agencies worldwide. With more than 12,000 current customers, Tarantella has developed an integrated, two-pronged sales and distribution strategy. Utilizing an extremely focused direct sales force, as well as enterprise distribution channels, its sales force effectively leverages value-added distributors and resellers, systems integrators, Original Equipment Manufacturers (OEMs) and independent software vendors (ISVs). Tarantella selects channel partners based on expertise, experience and access to the target markets. In most large opportunities, channel partners and Tarantella sales representatives work together on identifying, selling and closing these targeted accounts.

 

In addition to its enterprise sales process, Tarantella sells to small to medium businesses through the PartnerConnect program, with registered and associate partners primarily managed by value-added distributors. Tarantella’s sales network includes the support of over 500 resellers and channel partners globally.

 

Customer Support and Services

 

Tarantella’s products are used in business-critical environments that require customer support and services to be essential to the full product offering. Tarantella’s services are designed to support customers ranging from small businesses to large enterprises, both at the end user and reseller levels. The Company offers a variety of support programs and services through its worldwide customer support and services staff as well as its authorized third-party education staff, support and channel partners:

 

Technical Support—Online support through the web and varying levels of telephone support for corporate accounts;

 

Educational Services—Courseware and instruction guides provided to the worldwide Tarantella Learning Centers, which train and provide materials for both end users and resellers;

 

Developer Services—Technical advisory and support services, as well as access to early product releases, for application developers.

 

The Company sells support services to end users on an annual contract basis. Options are available for customers to tailor support solutions to meet their specific needs. Electronic access to support services is available via the Internet. Software updates, enhancements and bug fixes are also available electronically. Tarantella also supports end users via Authorized Tarantella Service Providers. In addition, the Company provides support services to distributors, Value Added Resellers, OEMs and integrators.

 

Product Development

 

Tarantella product development is comprised of one integrated organization with three sites located in Santa Cruz, California, Leeds, United Kingdom, and Pune, India. Tarantella has developed or acquired skills in complex Internet infrastructure areas including web-based technologies, communications, security, Java

 

6


Table of Contents

technology, virtual user interfaces, networking, adaptive protocols, as well as deep expertise in Microsoft platforms such as Windows Terminal Services, Active Directory, and Microsoft Windows Server 2000 and 2003, Microsoft SQL, COM, and DCOM. The combined product team has developed strong links with application server vendors, including Microsoft, IBM, Sun and Oracle, as well as with client vendors manufacturing a range of products from traditional desktop and complex workstation clients to thin clients and wireless handheld devices.

 

Tarantella holds five patents entitled “Method of Displaying an Application on a Variety of Client Devices in a Client/Server Network”, “Universal Application Server for Providing Applications on a Variety of Client Devices in a Client/Server Network”, “Network Traffic by Instruction Packet Size Reduction”, “Detection of Peripheral Input Activity and Dynamic System Response”, “System and Method for Virtualizing and Controlling I/O of Applications”. Tarantella also has a number of patent applications pending, including “Color Quality and Packet Shaping Features for Displaying an Application on a Variety of Client Devices”, “System and Method for Dynamic Allocation of Computing Tasks”, “System and Method for Dynamic Content Allocation”, “Improved Client Server Technique for Distributed Computing”, and “System and Method for Managing Access of Distributed Resources”.

 

Tarantella devotes resources to ongoing product testing and quality assurance to support product reliability. The Company believes its ability to integrate product technologies, to incorporate a wide variety of standards into its products and to continue to offer enhancements to its existing products is essential to maintaining a competitive advantage in the marketplace.

 

Employees

 

As of September 30, 2003, Tarantella had 90 full time equivalent employees, including 24 in product development, 35 in sales and marketing, 8 in customer support services and 23 in distribution services and administration. In addition, Tarantella employs 18 product development contractors in Pune, India.

 

Brief Company History

 

    1979 Doug Michels and Larry Michels co-found The Santa Cruz Operation, Inc.

 

    1986 Company expands into Europe—acquisition of a division of Logica, UK.

 

    1987 Agreement with Microsoft to license XENIX.

 

    1992 Launch of SCO OpenServer product.

 

    1993 Acquisition of IXI, Ltd. for client integration technology

 

    1993 Company goes public on Nasdaq Stock Market, trading as SCOC

 

    1994 Acquisition of Visionware, Ltd., for client emulation technology

 

    1995 Acquisition of UNIX technology from Novell

 

    1997 Launch of the Tarantella product.

 

    1998 Launch of UnixWare7 product.

 

    2001 Release of Tarantella Enterprise 3 software.

 

    2001 Sale of Server Operating System (“Server”) division and the Server Professional Services (“Professional Services”) division to Caldera Systems, Inc.

 

    2001 Company changes name to Tarantella, and changes trading symbol to TTLA

 

    2003 Acquisition of New Moon Systems, Inc. for Windows-based products expertise

 

    2003 Tarantella begins trading as TTLA.PK

 

 

7


Table of Contents

Geographic Information

 

Information about the geographies in which we operate can be found in Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements at Note 19, “Segment Information and Geographic Data.”

 

Item 2.    Properties

 

The Company occupies leased office space in the United States, the United Kingdom, Germany, Spain and Italy, consisting of an aggregate of approximately 32,000 square feet. The Company believes that these facilities are adequate for its needs in the foreseeable future.

 

Item 3.    Legal Proceedings

 

On August 28, 2003, a former Tarantella sales representative, filed an action against Tarantella, Inc. and Tarantella International, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Tarantella, (collectively, “Tarantella”) in the California Superior Court in Santa Clara County, California. The complaint purports to state claims for breach of contract, negligent and intentional misrepresentation, fraud, and deceit. The complaint alleges that the plaintiff is owed commissions on certain sales of Tarantella products, and seeks an unspecified amount of damages, correction of the purported contract, prejudgment interest, punitive damages and costs. On September 25, 2003, Tarantella filed a response denying the claims and asserting affirmative defenses. The case is presently in the discovery stage.

 

Tarantella believes the allegations contained in the complaint are without merit and intends to defend the action vigorously. Should the plaintiff’s claims succeed, however, Tarantella could be required to pay monetary damages, which could have a material adverse effect on Tarantella’s business, financial position and results.

 

No other material legal proceedings are pending to which the Company is a party.

 

Item 4.    Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

 

Not applicable.

 

8


Table of Contents

PART II

 

Item 5.    Market for Registrant’s Common Stock and Related Stockholder Matters

 

The following required information is filed as a part of the report:

 

The Company’s common stock is quoted on the Over-the-Counter (“OTC”) Pink Sheets, under the symbol “TTLA.PK”. The following table sets forth the range of high and low closing sale prices for the Common Stock for the periods indicated:

 

     Low Sale Price

   High Sale Price

Fiscal 2002:

             

First Quarter

   $ 1.25    $ 3.90

Second Quarter

   $ 1.55    $ 3.55

Third Quarter

   $ 1.80    $ 3.20

Fourth Quarter

   $ 1.00    $ 1.95

Fiscal 2003:

             

First Quarter

   $ 0.75    $ 1.45

Second Quarter

   $ 0.75    $ 1.05

Third Quarter

   $ 0.85    $ 2.65

Fourth Quarter

   $ 1.07    $ 2.20

 

On January 22, 2004, there were approximately 12,800 holders of record of the Company’s common stock, and 15,279,271 shares issued and outstanding.

 

The information required by this Item regarding equity compensation is incorporated by reference to the information set forth in Item 12 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

 

Dividend Policy

 

The Company has never declared or paid cash dividends on its capital stock. The Company currently expects to retain future earnings, if any, for use in the operation and expansion of its business and does not anticipate paying any cash dividends in the foreseeable future.

 

Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities

 

On September 30, 2003, the Company completed a private placement of common stock and warrants to Special Situations Technology Funds and Vertical Ventures resulting in gross proceeds to the Company of approximately $2,250,000 for which the Company will pay placement fees of $118,345. The Company issued 1,950,000 shares of common stock at a price of $1.156 and warrants to purchase 1,950,000 shares of common stock at $1.395 per share. Such shares of common stock and warrants were issued pursuant to an exemption from registration under Section 4(2) and/or Regulation D promulgated under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. See Note 11 to the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements. See Note 23 for details on private placements completed after September 30, 2003.

 

9


Table of Contents

Item 6.    Selected Financial Data

 

TARANTELLA, INC.

 

SELECTED FIVE YEAR FINANCIAL INFORMATION

 

     Fiscal Year Ended September 30,

     2003

   

2002

(As restated*)


    2001

    2000

    1999

     (In thousands, except per share data)

Net revenues

   $ 14,006     $ 14,220     $ 66,662     $ 148,923     $ 223,624

Cost of revenues

     1,555       1,499       17,315       41,796       49,778
    


 


 


 


 

Gross margin

     12,451       12,721       49,347       107,127       173,846

Operating expenses

     21,712       27,504       83,724       158,360       157,473
    


 


 


 


 

Operating income (loss)

     (9,261 )     (14,783 )     (34,377 )     (51,233 )     16,373

Other income (expense):

                                      

Gain (loss) on sale of divisions to Caldera

     —         (2,443 )     53,267       —         —  

Gain on sale of Caldera common stock

     —         4,491       —         —         —  

Loss and impairment of equity in investment in Caldera

     —         (4,010 )     (27,066 )     —         —  

Interest income, net

     46       518       1,118       1,679       1,942

Other income (expense), net

     (169 )     (1,040 )     253       819       1,939
    


 


 


 


 

Income (loss) before income taxes

     (9,384 )     (17,267 )     (6,805 )     (48,735 )     20,254

Income taxes (benefit)

     300       (1,076 )     (1,070 )     8,218       3,396
    


 


 


 


 

Net income (loss)

   $ (9,684 )   $ (16,191 )   $ (5,735 )   $ (56,953 )   $ 16,858
    


 


 


 


 

Comprehensive income (loss)

   $ (9,248 )   $ (15,907 )   $ (11,388 )   $ (51,875 )   $ 15,974
    


 


 


 


 

Earnings (loss) per share—basic

   $ (1.10 )   $ (2.00 )   $ (0.72 )   $ (7.97 )   $ 2.46
    


 


 


 


 

Earnings (loss) per share—diluted

   $ (1.10 )   $ (2.00 )   $ (0.72 )   $ (7.97 )   $ 2.32
    


 


 


 


 

Shares used in per share

    calculation—basic

     8,809       8,096       7,966       7,144       6,846
    


 


 


 


 

Shares used in per share

    calculation—diluted

     8,809       8,096       7,966       7,144       7,280
    


 


 


 


 

     September 30,

     2003

   

2002

(As restated*)


    2001

    2000

    1999

     (In thousands)

Cash, equivalents and short-term investments

   $ 3,151     $ 7,055     $ 14,100     $ 26,446     $ 62,844

Working capital

     (2,226 )     3,563       10,021       16,654       44,813

Total assets

     12,388       13,254       35,591       82,202       139,284

Long-term liabilities

     36       33       1,853       5,462       11,094

Shareholders’ equity

     2,468       5,811       20,793       31,202       70,338

The significant change in the above selected financial data in fiscal 2001 is due to the sale of the Server and Professional Services divisions to Caldera International in May 2001. See note 13 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

*   2002 financial results have been restated—See note 2 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

10


Table of Contents

Item 7.    Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

 

This Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations should be read in conjunction with the Company’s consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, as well as the Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Result of Operations included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2003. In addition to historical information contained herein, this Discussion and Analysis contains forward-looking statements. These statements involve risks and uncertainties and can be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology such as “estimates,” “projects,” “anticipates,” “plans,” “future,” “may,” “will,” “should,” “predicts,” “potential,” “continue,” “expects,” “intends,” “believes,” and similar expressions. Examples of forward-looking statements include those relating to financial risk management activities and the adequacy of financial resources for operations. These and other forward-looking statements are only estimates and predictions. While the Company (also referred to as “Tarantella”) believes that the expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements are reasonable, the Company’s actual results could differ materially. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which reflect management’s expectations only as of the date hereof.

 

Overview

 

Tarantella is a leading provider of Internet infrastructure software that enables web-based access to enterprise applications.

 

Tarantella products provide managed and secure web access to enterprise mainframe, Windows, AS/400, Linux, and UNIX applications. It leverages existing IT assets to provide cost savings, improved productivity, and the flexibility to accommodate the rapid changes in today’s organizations.

 

Restatement

 

Subsequent to the issuance of the Company’s consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2002, the three months ended December 31, 2002 and the three and six months ended March 31, 2003, the Company’s management determined that the accounting treatment initially afforded to certain transactions was not correct. As a result, the accompanying consolidated financial statements for the year ended September 30, 2002 have been restated.

 

The effects of the restatement are presented in note 2 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements and have been reflected in management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations.

 

Critical Accounting Policies

 

The preparation of financial statements and related disclosures in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make judgments, assumptions and estimates that affect the amounts reported in the Company’s consolidated financial statements and the accompanying notes. Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2003 describes the significant accounting policies and methods used in the preparation of the consolidated financial statements for the three fiscal years in the period ended September 30, 2003. The amounts of assets and liabilities reported on the balance sheets and the amounts of revenues and expenses reported for each of the fiscal periods are affected by estimates and assumptions which are used for, but not limited to, the accounting for revenue, product returns and a valuation allowance for deferred tax assets. Actual results could differ from these estimates. The following critical accounting policies are significantly affected by judgments, assumptions and estimates used in the preparation of the consolidated financial statements.

 

Revenue Recognition:    The Company’s net revenues are derived from software licenses and fees for services, which include custom engineering, maintenance, support and training. In accordance with Statement of Position 97-2 “Software Revenue Recognition”, revenue is recognized when the price is fixed and determinable,

 

11


Table of Contents

upon persuasive evidence of an arrangement, when fulfillment of the Company’s obligations under any such agreement is complete and when there is a determination that collection is probable. Payment arrangements with customers provide primarily 30-day terms and to a limited extent with certain customers 45, 60 or 90 day terms. In certain transactions, the Company does not have a reliable basis to estimate returns and allowances for certain customers or is unable to determine that collection of receivables is probable. In such circumstances, the Company defers revenues at the time of sale and recognizes revenues when collection of the related receivable becomes probable, which is generally upon receipt of cash, and when any potential returns can be reasonably estimated.

 

For multiple element contracts involving the sale of the Tarantella product the Company uses the residual value method to allocate revenue to each component. The fair value of services and post contract support is determined based upon separate sales and renewal rates set forth in the contract, respectively.

 

The Company recognizes revenue from maintenance fees for ongoing customer support and product updates ratably over the period of the maintenance contract. Payments for maintenance fees are generally made in advance and are non-refundable. For revenue allocated to education and consulting services or derived from the separate sale of such services, the Company recognizes revenue as the related services are performed.

 

The Company performs ongoing credit evaluations of its customers’ financial condition and does not require collateral. The Company maintains allowances for potential credit losses and such losses have been within management’s expectations.

 

Returns and Reserves:    The Company records a provision for product returns for related sales in the same period as the related revenues are recorded. These estimates are based on historical sales returns, analysis of credit memo data and other known factors. If the historical data the Company uses to calculate these estimates does not properly reflect future returns, revenue could be affected.

 

Allowance for doubtful accounts:    Payments from customers are continuously monitored and allowances are maintained for doubtful accounts for estimated losses resulting from the inability of customers to make required payments. When evaluating the adequacy of allowances for doubtful accounts, various factors are taken into account, including accounts receivable aging, customer credit-worthiness, historical bad debts, and geographic and political risk. If the financial condition of customers were to deteriorate, resulting in an impairment of their ability to make payments, additional allowances may be required. As of September 30, 2003, the Company’s net accounts receivable balance was $3.0 million.

 

Restructuring charges:    Over the last several years the Company has undertaken significant broad restructuring initiatives. These initiatives have required the recording of estimated provisions for severance and outplacement costs, lease cancellations, long-term asset write downs, and other restructuring costs. Given the significance and the timing of the execution of such activities, this process is complex and involves periodic reassessments of estimates made at the time the original decisions were made. The accounting for restructuring costs and asset impairments requires the recording of provisions and charges when actions are taken and/or appropriate approval for taking action is obtained, and when a liability is incurred. Company policies require continual evaluation of the adequacy of the remaining liabilities under restructuring initiatives. As management continues to evaluate the business, there may be additional charges for new restructuring activities as well as changes in estimates of amounts previously recorded.

 

Income Taxes:    Tarantella has operations in many countries other than the United States. Transfer prices for services provided between the United States and these countries has been documented by management based on consultation with appropriate outside service providers as reasonable, however, tax authorities could challenge these transfer prices and assess additional taxes on prior period transactions. Any such assessment could require the Company to record an additional tax provision in its statement of operations.

 

12


Table of Contents

Income tax assets and liabilities are determined by taxable jurisdiction. The Company evaluates net deferred tax assets in each tax jurisdiction by estimating the likelihood of the Company generating future profits to realize these assets. When necessary, a valuation allowance is recorded to reduce tax assets to an amount for which realization is more likely than not. The provision for income taxes represents taxes payable for the current period, plus the net change in deferred tax amounts.

 

Goodwill and intangible assets:    The Company reviews the value of long-lived assets, including goodwill, in accordance with the applicable accounting literature for impairment whenever events or changes in business circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the assets may not be fully recoverable or that the useful lives of these assets are no longer appropriate. As of September 30, 2003, the Company had $1.3 million of net intangible assets and $2.4 million of goodwill remaining on the balance sheet. The Company believes that the net intangible assets will be realizable based on the estimated future cash flows of the associated products and technology. At September 30, 2003, the Company does not believe that the goodwill is impaired. However, it is possible that the estimates and assumptions used, such as future sales and expense levels, in assessing the carrying value of these assets may need to be reevaluated in the case of continued market deterioration, which could result in impairment of these assets.

 

De-Listing Status

 

On October 20, 2003, the Company announced that it had received notification from the Nasdaq Listing Qualifications Panel that the Company’s stock would discontinue trading on the Nasdaq SmallCap Market effective with the open of business on Tuesday, October 21, 2003.

 

This action followed Tarantella’s appeal to Nasdaq for a listing extension after not meeting the stated time requirements to file SEC Form 10-Q for the Company’s third fiscal quarter. The Nasdaq Panel determination to delist the Company’s stock was based on the Company’s filing delinquency, public interest concerns, and the nature of the ongoing internal revenue investigation. On December 8, 2003, the Company filed an appeal to reverse that portion of the Nasdaq Panel’s decision relating to its public interest concerns. On February 27, 2004, the Nasdaq advised the Company that its appeal had been denied.

 

Tarantella’s common stock is not currently eligible to trade on the OTC Bulletin Board but is eligible for quotation on the OTC Pink Sheets. The Company’s trading symbol has changed to TTLA.PK.

 

Regaining SEC compliance may allow the Company’s shares to be eligible for trading on the OTC Bulletin Board. If the Company resumes compliance with the periodic reporting requirements of the 1934 Exchange Act, it will attempt to meet the listing requirements for the Nasdaq SmallCap Market, however some requirements such as minimum bid price and market capitalization are outside of the Company’s control.

 

Management Change

 

On December 11, 2003, the Company announced that its Board of Directors had appointed Francis E. Wilde as Chief Executive Officer (CEO), President and a Director of the Company. Mr. Wilde succeeds Douglas Michels, who became a strategic advisor to the Company, focusing initially on merger and acquisition opportunities. Mr. Michels will also continue as a Director of Tarantella.

 

The Board has also approved the request by several senior executives including Messrs. Wilde, Michels and Alok Mohan, the Company’s Chairman, to receive a substantial portion of their calendar year 2004 compensation in the form of restricted stock in lieu of cash.

 

On January 6, 2004, the Company announced the appointment of John M. Greeley as Chief Financial Officer (CFO), reporting directly to Mr. Wilde. Mr. Greeley assumed the CFO responsibilities from Mr. Mohan, who had been serving as acting CFO since September 8, 2003.

 

13


Table of Contents

Results of Operations

 

Net Revenues

 

The Company’s net revenues are derived from software licenses and fees for services, which include engineering services, consulting, custom engineering, support and training.

 

Net revenues were $14.0 million in fiscal 2003, a decrease of 2% from $14.2 million in fiscal 2002. In fiscal 2002, net revenues decreased by 79% from $66.7 million in fiscal 2001. Revenue declined slightly in fiscal 2003 due to a decrease in prepaid royalty transactions to OEM’s and ISV’s. In fiscal 2002, the Company had $3.2 million in revenue for prepaid royalties. In fiscal 2003, this number decreased to $1.7 million. The decrease of 47% in prepaid royalty transactions in fiscal 2003 was due to customers still consuming prepaid royalties purchased in fiscal 2002. The decline in revenue performance in fiscal 2002 was worldwide across all geographies and is attributable to the sale of a significant portion of the company’s business during fiscal 2001. The Company’s revenues were also impacted by the general reduction in information technology (“IT”) spending by companies for application server software and service initiatives. For the fiscal year ended September 30, 2003, Northrop Grumman Computing accounted for 13.7% of the Company’s net revenues and for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2002, Netilla Networks, Inc. accounted for 10.3% of the Company’s net revenues. For the fiscal years ended September 30, 2001, no single customer accounted for more than 10% of the Company’s net revenues.

 

International revenues continue to be a significant portion of net revenues, comprising 53% of the revenues for fiscal 2003 and 44% and 52% for 2002 and 2001, respectively.

 

License Revenues.    License revenues were $11.0 million in fiscal 2003 as compared to $11.4 million in fiscal 2002 and $55.8 million in fiscal 2001, representing a decrease of 3% in fiscal 2003 over 2002 and a decrease of 80% in fiscal 2002 over 2001. License revenues were 78% of total net revenues for fiscal 2003 and 80% and 84% of total net revenues for fiscal 2002 and 2001, respectively. The decline in license revenues in fiscal 2003 is due to a decrease in prepaid royalty transactions to OEMs and ISVs. In fiscal 2002, the Company had $3.2 million in revenue for prepaid royalties. In fiscal 2003, this number decreased to $1.7 million. The decrease of 47% in prepaid royalty transactions in fiscal 2003 was due to the fact that customers were still consuming prepaid royalties purchased in fiscal 2002. The decline in license revenues in fiscal 2002 is attributed to the sale of the server business to Caldera Systems, Inc. (“Caldera”).

 

Services Revenues. Services revenues were $3.0 million in fiscal 2003, an increase of 6% over the $2.9 million in fiscal 2002. Services revenues were $2.9 million in fiscal 2002, a decrease of 74% from the $10.8 million in fiscal 2001. Services revenues were 22% of the total revenue for fiscal 2003, compared to 20% in the prior year. The increase in services revenues in fiscal 2003 was primarily due to an increased percentage of customers purchasing service contracts. The decline in services revenues in fiscal 2002 was primarily in the Professional Services area and is the result of the sale of the Professional Services business to Caldera.

 

Cost of Revenues

 

The Company’s overall cost of revenues as a percentage of net revenues can be affected by changes in net revenue contribution between product families, geographic regions and channels of distribution, since both price and cost characteristics associated with these revenue streams can vary greatly. The Company can also experience fluctuations in gross margin as net revenues increase or decrease since certain costs of revenues including technology, services, and distribution act as fixed costs within certain volume ranges.

 

Cost of License Revenues.    Cost of license revenues includes royalties paid to certain software vendors, amortization of acquired technologies, product packaging, documentation and all costs associated with the acquisition of components and shipping. Cost of license revenues as a percentage of license revenues remained flat with fiscal 2002 at 3%. In fiscal 2001, cost of license revenues as a percentage of license revenues, was 15%.

 

14


Table of Contents

The 12% decrease from 2001 to 2002 was primarily due to the fact that fiscal 2001 cost of license revenues included server products, which had significantly higher royalty and technology rates than Tarantella products. The decrease to 3% in fiscal 2003 and fiscal 2002 is also due to the fact that technology related to the Company’s Vision Family products became fully amortized during fiscal 2001. Additionally, material costs continue to decline as a result of the increasing number of Internet orders. Also certain fixed costs such as technology and overhead declined.

 

Cost of Services Revenues.    Cost of services revenues includes documentation, consulting and personnel related expenses associated with providing such services. Costs of services revenues as a percentage of services revenues decreased to 40% in fiscal 2003 from 41% in fiscal 2002. In fiscal 2001, costs of services revenues as a percentage of services revenues was 83%. The cost of services improved dramatically in fiscal 2003 and fiscal 2002 primarily as a result of the sale of the Professional Services division to Caldera. The Professional Services division that was sold performed services primarily for server products. Services for server products had negative gross margins, unlike services for Tarantella products (non-server and non-Vision Family), which had positive gross margins. The improvement in cost of services revenues in fiscal 2003 and fiscal 2002 is also a result of reduced staffing levels in the support organization due to realignment of this organization.

 

Research and Development

 

The Company invests in research and development both for new products and to provide continuing enhancements to current products. Research and development expenses decreased 24% to $4.3 million in fiscal 2003 from $5.6 million in fiscal 2002, which was a decrease of 69% from fiscal 2001 spending of $18.4 million. Research and development expenses represented 31% of net revenues for fiscal 2003, 40% of net revenues for fiscal 2002, and 28% of net revenues for fiscal 2001. The decrease in research and development expenses in fiscal 2003 is due to lower labor costs, which decreased $0.5 million from fiscal 2002 to fiscal 2003. The lower labor costs were driven by lower headcount, which decreased by 41% as a result of several planned reductions in force. Labor costs were also lower because there was a 15% pay reduction for all employees in research and development. In addition to lower labor costs, there was a reduction of allocations for facilities and IT costs. Expenses allocated to research and development decreased by $0.6 million in fiscal 2003. The reason for the decrease in allocations is that there was lower headcount in the allocated departments and there was an elimination of redundant facilities. The decrease in research and development in fiscal 2002 was due to lower labor costs as a result of lower headcount and also the favorable impact of the sale of the Server Software and Professional Services divisions to Caldera. Research and development expense as a percentage of revenue increased in fiscal 2003 and fiscal 2002 over fiscal 2001 because fiscal 2001 costs included research and development for the Server business which were lower as a percentage of revenue since the products were more mature.

 

Selling, General and Administrative

 

Selling, general and administrative expenses decreased 22% to $15.2 million in fiscal 2003, compared with $19.6 million in fiscal 2002 and $64.3 million in fiscal 2001. Selling, general and administrative expenses represented 108% of net revenues in fiscal 2003, 138% in fiscal 2002 and 96% in fiscal 2001. The decrease in selling, general and administrative expenses in fiscal 2003 was mainly due to lower labor costs, which decreased by $2.1 million. The lower labor costs were driven by lower headcount, which decreased by 39% as a result of several planned reductions in force. Labor costs were also lower because there was a 15% pay reduction for all employees in marketing and general and administrative and a 7.5% pay reduction for all employees in sales. In addition to lower labor costs, there was a reduction of allocations for facilities and IT costs. Expenses allocated to selling, general and administrative decreased by $0.9 million in fiscal 2003. The reason for the decrease in allocations is that there was lower headcount in the allocated departments and there was an elimination of redundant facilities. The decrease in labor and allocation costs in selling, general and administrative expenses was partially offset by increased legal and audit fees, which resulted from the restatement audit. The Company incurred expenses of $0.7 million during fiscal 2003 for the internal revenue investigation and the related

 

15


Table of Contents

restatement audit. The decrease in selling, general and administrative expenses in fiscal 2002 was due to lower labor costs as a result of lower headcount and also the favorable impact of the sale of the Server Software and Professional Services divisions to Caldera. Selling, general and administrative expenses also decreased in fiscal 2002 because fiscal 2001 included executive retention bonuses of $2.1 million associated with the sale of a significant division to Caldera. Selling, general and administrative expense as a percentage of revenue increased in fiscal 2003 and fiscal 2002 over fiscal 2001 because fiscal 2001 costs included selling, general and administrative expenses for the Server business, which were lower as a percentage of revenue since the products were more mature. The significant increase in selling, general and administrative expense as a percentage of revenue in fiscal 2003 and fiscal 2002 is due to fixed costs spread over much lower revenue.

 

Allowance for doubtful accounts at the end of September 30, 2003 was $0.5 million, or 15% of gross accounts receivable. At the end of September 30, 2002, allowance for doubtful accounts was $0.3 million, or 11% of gross accounts receivable. The increase in allowance for doubtful accounts was due to an increase in bad debt reserves of $0.1 million due to reserves acquired from the New Moon acquisition. There was also a $0.1 million increase in reserves for returns authorized but not yet returned.

 

Restructuring Charges

 

Restructuring charges of $2.2 million were incurred in fiscal year 2003. This included $1.7 million relating to worldwide restructurings undertaken in the first, third and fourth quarters of fiscal 2003 and provision adjustments of $0.5 million made in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2003. The restructurings included a reduction in staffing of 62 employees, expenses associated with the closing of several foreign offices and the write-off of fixed assets. As of September 30, 2003, 61 employees had been terminated. These reductions were made to align spending with lower than expected Company revenues. The Company also made provision adjustments to prior restructurings because it has been unable to sublet space in the Santa Cruz, California office. The Company has now reserved for this space through the end of fiscal 2004, as it believes it will sublease the space within the next twelve months.

 

Restructuring charges of $2.3 million were incurred in fiscal year 2002 relating to a worldwide restructuring undertaken in the first quarter of fiscal 2002 and provision adjustments made in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2002. The restructuring included a reduction in staffing of 52 employees, a reserve for unused facilities at the Company’s corporate headquarters, and costs associated with closing several foreign offices. As of September 30, 2002, all 52 positions were eliminated, all severance was paid out and all of the foreign office closures included in this reserve were completed. Of the $2.3 million, all but $39,000 related to cash expenditures. These reductions were made to align spending with lower than expected Company revenues. The Company also made provision adjustments to prior restructurings because it has been unable to sublet space in the Santa Cruz, California office.

 

Restructuring charges of $1.0 million were incurred in fiscal year 2001 that related to worldwide restructurings undertaken in the second and fourth quarters of fiscal 2001. The restructurings included a reduction in personnel of approximately 38 employees and elimination of non-essential facilities. As of September 30, 2001, all 38 positions were eliminated, and all cash payments had been made. The entire $1.0 million charge related to cash expenditures. These reductions were made to align spending with lower than expected company revenues.

 

Other Income (Expense)

 

Other income and expense consists of interest income net of interest expense, foreign exchange gains and losses, and realized gains and losses on investments, as well as other miscellaneous income and expense items. Net interest income was $46,000 in fiscal 2003 compared to net interest income of $0.5 million in fiscal 2002 and $1.1 million in fiscal 2001. Net interest income decreased in fiscal 2003 due to the decrease in cash from $7.0 million at the end of fiscal 2002 to $3.2 million at the end of fiscal 2003. In order to keep cash balances

 

16


Table of Contents

needed for operations, the Company discontinued investing cash in short-term investments. In fiscal 2003 the Company had other expense of $0.2 million compared to other expense of $1.0 million in fiscal 2002 and other income of $0.3 million in fiscal 2001. The $0.2 million of other expense in fiscal 2003 was for charges related to the impairment of certain investments. The $1.0 million of other expense in fiscal 2002 was due mainly to the impairment of certain investments of $0.9 million. The other income in fiscal 2001 was due to funds received from a securities class action recovery.

 

In January 2001, the Company sold 3.2 million shares of its Rainmaker Systems (RMKR) stock for $1.00 per share, and received cash proceeds of $3.2 million. The cost basis of the sale was $1.1 million, and the Company realized a gain of $2.1 million from this sale.

 

In fiscal 2002, the Company’s other income/(expense) included equity losses of $4.0 million for its share of Caldera International losses; also a loss of $2.4 million was recorded against the gain on the sale of divisions to Caldera. This loss included expense of $3.0 million for the early redemption of a note receivable for Caldera. In fiscal 2001 there was a $53.3 million gain included in other income for the sale of the Server and Professional Services divisions to Caldera. This gain was partially offset by losses of $27.1 million for a partial impairment of the Caldera investment and equity losses from the investment. The charge taken for the impairment of the Caldera investment was $22.5 million. The loss from the equity investment in Caldera was $4.6 million.

 

Income Taxes

 

In fiscal 2003, 2002 and 2001, the Company’s effective income tax rates were (3%), 7%, and 16%. The fiscal 2003 tax of $0.3 million reflects foreign income taxes of $0.5 million less the resolution of foreign audit issues of $0.2 million. The fiscal 2002 tax benefit of $1.1 million reflects benefits of $0.3 million due to a change in US law and $1.3 million due to the resolution of foreign audit issues, less foreign income taxes of $0.5 million. The fiscal 2001 tax benefit reflects a benefit of $1.1 million due to the resolution of foreign audit issues and foreign income taxes of $0.5 million.

 

Net Income (Loss)

 

The Company reported a net loss of $9.7 million in fiscal 2003 compared to a net loss of $16.2 million in fiscal 2002, and a net loss of $5.7 million in fiscal 2001. Net losses were lower in fiscal 2003 than in fiscal 2002 because the Company implemented several cost reduction measures to reduce the Company’s breakeven point. Although net losses were higher in fiscal 2002 than fiscal 2001, operating losses in fiscal 2002 were lower than in fiscal 2001 because of the cost reduction measures. Net losses were higher in fiscal 2002 because fiscal 2002 included $6.5 million in losses from the sale of divisions to Caldera and fiscal 2001 included a net $26.2 million gain from the sale of divisions to Caldera.

 

Liquidity and Capital Resources

 

The Company has financed its operations through cash flow from operations, private offerings of the Company’s common stock and bank borrowings. As of September 30, 2003, the Company’s principal source of liquidity included cash and cash equivalents of $3.2 million, representing 25% of total assets and an available bank line of credit under which the Company had $0.3 million of outstanding borrowings. The credit agreement provides that the Company may borrow up to $1.5 million at 2.5% per month based on 75% of eligible accounts receivable. The line of credit has no financial covenants and is secured by the assets of the Company. See Note 8 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. The decrease in cash and short-term investments of $3.9 million in 2003 is due to operating losses of $9.3 million, partially offset by $3.3 million of cash received in the acquisition of New Moon Systems and $2.1 million in proceeds from a private placement.

 

17


Table of Contents

The Company’s operating activities used cash of $9.3 million during fiscal 2003, compared to $17.2 million used for operating activities for fiscal 2002. The decrease in the cash used for operating activities is due to a $5.5 million decrease in operating loss from fiscal 2002 to fiscal 2003. The operating loss was $9.3 million in fiscal 2003 compared to a loss of $14.8 million in fiscal 2002. Cash provided by investing activities was $3.0 million in fiscal 2003 compared to cash provided from investing activities of $12.4 million in fiscal 2002. The decrease in cash provided by investing activities was attributable primarily to the proceeds received from the early redemption of a note receivable related to the sale of divisions to Caldera, which were included in the fiscal 2002 results. Cash provided by financing activities was $2.4 million for fiscal 2003 compared with cash used in financing activities of $0.3 million for fiscal 2002.

 

The Company’s days sales outstanding (DSO) at the end of fiscal 2003 was 87, an increase of 16 days from 71 days at the end of fiscal 2002. DSO is calculated using revenues for the fourth quarter of each fiscal year, and net accounts receivable at September 30. There was an increase in DSO at the end of fiscal 2003 because there was one transaction totaling $0.6 million, for a large Italian customer, which was paid late. DSO is impacted about 1.4 days for every $50,000 that is uncollected, so this transaction added 15 days to the Company’s DSO.

 

On September 30, 2003, the Company completed a private placement of common stock and warrants to Special Situations Technology Funds and Vertical Ventures resulting in gross proceeds to the Company of approximately $2,254,200 for which the Company paid fees of $155,345. The Company issued 1,950,000 shares of common stock at a price of $1.156 and warrants to purchase 1,950,000 shares of common stock at $1.395 per share. The warrants have a value of $895,592, based on the relative fair value using a Black-Scholes calculation, using a volatility of 100%, an annual dividend of zero and a discount rate of 2.63%. The Company can require the warrant holders to exercise one-third of the warrants provided the shares issuable thereunder are registered with the SEC and the share price equals or exceeds $1.674 for a period of twenty consecutive trading days. In addition, the Company can redeem up to two-thirds of the warrants or all of the warrants for $0.01 per share should the closing bid price of the shares reach the target prices of $2.232 and $2.790, respectively. The warrant holders may exercise the warrants prior to redemption. The warrants expire on September 30, 2008. If the warrants are fully exercised, the Company would receive additional gross proceeds of approximately $2,700,000. The Company also has agreed to register the shares of common stock issued to the investors as well as the shares issuable upon exercise of the warrants for resale once the Company has complied with its reporting obligations under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. If the shares and warrants are not registered in a timely manner, the Company will be obligated to pay damages for the delay, in an amount equal to one-percent per month of the aggregate amount invested, until registered.

 

On December 26, 2003, the Company completed a private placement of common stock and warrants to the following investors: Special Situations Technology Funds (who are expanding on their previous investment), Starlight Digital Technologies, LLC, an investment group in which Mr. Wilde acts as Managing Director, and an additional private investor, resulting in gross proceeds to the Company of approximately $2,750,000. In connection with the financing, the Company paid placement fees in the amount of $232,303.

 

On February 23, 2004, the Company announced the completion of a private placement of common stock and warrants to various investors. In the private placement, the investors purchased 11,678,580 shares of Tarantella common stock at a price of $1.40 per share. The investors also acquired warrants to purchase up to an additional 2,335,714 shares at an exercise price of $1.70 per share for gross proceeds of $16,350,000. The warrants are exercisable for five years. If the warrants are fully exercised, the Company would receive additional gross proceeds of approximately $3,970,714. The Company also has agreed to register the shares of common stock issued to the investors as well as the shares issuable upon exercise of the warrants for resale once the Company has complied with its reporting obligations under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. In connection with the financing, the Company will pay fees in the amount of $1,074,000.

 

In the first quarter of fiscal 2004, the Company implemented a restructuring which reduced the existing workforce by two employees. The Company expects to record a charge of $0.2 million for this restructuring in the first quarter of fiscal 2004. All charges related to this restructuring will be cash charges.

 

18


Table of Contents

The Company has capital lease commitments of $32,000 in fiscal 2004. There are no capital lease commitments beyond fiscal 2004. The Company has operating lease commitments of $1.3 million in fiscal 2004. The Company’s various operating lease commitments extend to 2020. See note 10 of the consolidated financial statements for more information.

 

The following summarizes Tarantella’s contractual lease obligations at September 30, 2003, and the effects such obligations are expected to have on liquidity and cash flow in future periods:

 

     Total

   Less than
1 Year


   1-3 Years

   4-5 Years

  

Beyond

5 Years


     (In thousands)

Contractual obligations:

                                  

Capital lease obligations

   $ 32    $ 32    $ —      $ —      $ —  

Non-cancelable operating lease obligations

     10,337      1,316      1,929      808      6,284
    

  

  

  

  

Total contractual cash obligation

   $ 10,369    $ 1,348    $ 1,929    $ 808    $ 6,284
    

  

  

  

  

 

The Company has an obligation to pay New Moon shareholders a minimum cash earnout of approximately $1.7 million over a period from January 1, 2004 to December 31, 2006 based on a royalty of 30% of New Moon product revenues, net of direct costs. After the shareholders have been paid the minimum earnout, they are entitled to an additional royalty of 15% of New Moon product revenues, net of direct costs, during this period. In the event the minimum earnout is not achieved by the conclusion of the quarter ending December 31, 2006, Tarantella shall pay along with the final earnout payment an amount equal to the minimum earnout less all aggregate earnouts paid to date, less any off-sets and any escrow claim deficiencies.

 

The Company has incurred net losses from operations of approximately $9.3 million during fiscal 2003 and $14.8 million during fiscal 2002 and revenues have declined from $14.2 million in fiscal 2002 to $14.0 million in fiscal 2003. The Company has an accumulated deficit of $124.8 million as of September 30, 2003.

 

The Company’s management believes that, based on the Company’s current plans, its existing cash and cash equivalents, short-term investments, and funds generated from operations will be sufficient to meet its operating requirements through fiscal 2004. The Company’s financial plan assumes revenue growth and decreased spending. If the Company does not achieve the revenue growth it anticipates or if expenses do not decline as planned, the Company will need additional financing. Management cannot be assured that additional financing will be available when it is needed.

 

Factors that may affect future results

 

Set forth below and elsewhere in this filing and in other documents the Company files with the SEC are risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from the results contemplated by the forward-looking statements in this filing.

 

THE COMPANY’S OPERATING RESULTS MAY FLUCTUATE IN FUTURE PERIODS.

 

The results of operations for any quarter or fiscal year are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected in future periods. The Company’s operating results have in the past been, and will continue to be, subject to quarterly and annual fluctuations as a result of a number of factors, including but not limited to:

 

    Overall technology spending

 

    Changes in general economic conditions and specific market conditions in the Internet infrastructure industry

 

    Rapid technological changes that can adversely affect the demand for the Company’s products

 

19


Table of Contents
    Fluctuations in demand for the Company’s products and services

 

    The public’s perception of the Company and its products

 

    The long sales and implementation cycle for the Company’s products

 

    General industry trends and the potential effects of price and product competition in the Internet infrastructure industry

 

    The introduction and acceptance of new technologies and products

 

    Reductions in sales to, or loss of, significant customers

 

    The timing of orders, timing of shipments, and the ability to satisfy all contractual obligations in customer contracts

 

    The impact of acquired technologies and businesses

 

    The Company’s ability to control spending and achieve targeted cost reductions

 

    The ability of the Company to generate cash adequate to continue operations

 

    The potential loss of key employees

 

    The Company’s ability to attract and retain qualified personnel

 

    Adverse changes in the value of equity investments in third parties held by the Company

 

    The ability of the Company’s customers and suppliers to obtain financing or to fund capital expenditures

 

As a consequence, operating results for a particular future period are difficult to predict.

 

THE COMPANY IS EXPOSED TO GENERAL ECONOMIC AND MARKET CONDITIONS.

 

Any significant downturn in the Company’s customers’ markets, or domestic and global conditions, which result in a decline in demand for their software and services could harm the Company’s business. The state of the economy has had a negative impact on the software industry. This could result in customers continuing to delay or cancel orders for software. Any of these occurrences could have a significant impact on the Company’s operating results, revenues and costs and may cause the market price of the Company’s common stock to decline or become more volatile.

 

The Company’s future operating results may be affected by various uncertain trends and factors that are beyond the Company’s control. These include adverse changes in general economic conditions and rapid or unexpected changes in the technologies affecting the Company’s products. The process of developing new high technology products is complex and uncertain and requires accurate anticipation of customer needs and technological trends.

 

THE COMPANY DEPENDS ON THE DEVELOPMENT AND ACCEPTANCE OF NEW PRODUCTS IN A RAPIDLY CHANGING MARKET.

 

The market for the Company’s products is characterized by rapidly changing technology, evolution of new industry standards, and frequent introductions of new products and product enhancements. The Company’s success will depend upon its continued ability to enhance its existing products, to introduce new products on a timely and cost-effective basis to meet evolving customer requirements, to achieve market acceptance for new product offerings, and to respond to emerging industry standards and other technological changes. There can be no assurance that the Company will be successful in developing new products or enhancing its existing products or that such new or enhanced products will receive market acceptance. The Company’s success also depends

 

20


Table of Contents

upon its ability to license from third parties and to incorporate into its products new technologies that become industry standards. There can be no assurance that the Company will continue to obtain such licenses on favorable terms or that it will successfully incorporate such third-party technologies into its own products.

 

The Company anticipates new releases of products in the fiscal year ending September 30, 2004. There can be no assurance that such new releases will not be affected by technical problems or “bugs”, as is common in the software industry. Furthermore, there can be no assurance that these or other future product introductions will not be delayed. Delays in the availability, or a lack of market acceptance, of new or enhanced products could have an adverse effect on the Company’s business. There can be no assurance that product introductions in the future will not disrupt product revenues and adversely affect operating results.

 

THE COMPANY COMPETES IN THE HIGHLY COMPETITIVE INTERNET INFRASTRUCTURE MARKET.

 

The industry has become increasingly competitive and, accordingly, the Company’s results may also be adversely affected by the actions of existing or future competitors, including the development of new technologies, the introduction of new products, and the reduction of prices by such competitors to gain or retain market share. The Company’s results of operations could be adversely affected if it were required to lower its prices significantly.

 

OPERATING RESULTS FOR A PARTICULAR QUARTER ARE DIFFICULT TO PREDICT.

 

The Company participates in a highly dynamic industry and future results could be subject to significant volatility, particularly on a quarterly basis. The Company’s revenues and operating results may be unpredictable due to the Company’s shipment patterns. The Company operates with little backlog of orders because its products are generally shipped as orders are received. In general, a substantial portion of the Company’s revenues have been booked and shipped in the third month of the quarter, with a concentration of these revenues in the latter half of that third month. In addition, the timing of closing of large license contracts and the release of new products and product upgrades increase the risk of quarter to quarter fluctuations and the uncertainty of quarterly operating results. The Company’s staffing and operating expense levels are based on an operating plan and are relatively fixed throughout the quarter. As a result, if revenues are not realized in the quarter as expected, the Company’s expected operating results and cash balances could be adversely affected, and such effect could be substantial and could result in an operating loss and depletion of the Company’s cash balances.

 

IT MAY BE DIFFICULT TO RAISE NEEDED CAPITAL IN THE FUTURE.

 

The Company may require substantial additional capital to finance future growth and fund ongoing operations through the remainder of fiscal 2004 and beyond. Although the Company’s current business plan does not foresee the need for further financing activities to fund the Company’s operations for the foreseeable future, due to risks and uncertainties in the market place, the Company may need to raise additional capital. The Company may raise additional funds through public or private financing, strategic relationships or other arrangements. The Company cannot be certain that the funding, if needed, will be available on attractive terms, or at all. Furthermore, any additional equity financing may be dilutive to shareholders, and debt financing, if available, may involve restrictive covenants. Strategic arrangements, if necessary to raise additional funds, may require the Company to relinquish its rights to certain of its technologies or products. If the Company fails to raise capital when needed, the business will be negatively affected, which could cause the stock price to decline.

 

THE COMPANY’S REVENUES MAY BE AFFECTED BY THE SEASONALITY OF REVENUES IN THE EUROPEAN AND GOVERNMENT MARKETS.

 

The Company experiences seasonality of revenues for both the European and the U.S. federal government markets. European revenues during the quarter ending June 30 are historically lower or relatively flat compared to the prior quarter. This reflects a reduction of customer purchases in anticipation of reduced selling activity

 

21


Table of Contents

during the summer months. Sales to the U.S. federal government generally increase during the quarter ending September 30. This seasonal increase is primarily attributable to increased purchasing activity by the U.S. federal government prior to the close of its fiscal year. Additionally, net revenues for the first quarter of the fiscal year are typically lower or relatively flat compared to net revenues of the prior quarter.

 

COST OF REVENUES MAY BE AFFECTED BY CHANGES IN THE MIX OF PRODUCTS AND SERVICES.

 

The overall cost of revenues may be affected by changes in the mix of net revenue contribution between licenses and services, geographical regions and channels of distribution, as the costs associated with these revenues may have substantially different characteristics. The Company may also experience a change in margin as net revenues increase or decrease since technology costs and services costs are fixed within certain volume ranges.

 

THE COMPANY’S OPERATIONAL RESULTS COULD BE AFFECTED BY PRICE VARIATIONS.

 

The Company’s results of operations could be adversely affected if it were to lower its prices significantly. In the event the Company reduced its prices, the Company’s standard terms for selected distributors would be to provide credit for inventory ordered in the previous 180 days, such credits to be applied against future purchases. The Company, as a matter of policy, does not allow product returns for a refund. Product returns are generally allowances for stock balancing and are accompanied by compensating and offsetting orders. Revenues are net of a provision for estimated future stock balancing and excess quantities above levels the Company believes are appropriate in its distribution channels. The Company monitors the quantity and mix of its product sales.

 

THE COMPANY IS DEPENDENT UPON INFORMATION RECEIVED FROM THIRD PARTIES IN ORDER TO DETERMINE RESERVES FOR PRODUCT RETURNS.

 

The Company depends on information received from external sources in evaluating the inventory levels at distribution partners in the determination of reserves for the return of materials not sold, stock rotation and price protection. Significant effort has gone into developing systems and procedures for determining the appropriate reserve level. In the event information is not received timely or accurately, the Company’s ability to monitor the inventory levels will be affected and may negatively impact the Company’s business.

 

THE COMPANY’S BUSINESS DEPENDS UPON ITS PROPRIETARY RIGHTS AND THERE IS A RISK THAT SUCH RIGHTS WILL BE INFRINGED.

 

The Company attempts to protect its software with a combination of patent, copyright, trademark, and trade secret laws, employee and third party nondisclosure agreements, license agreements, and other methods of protection. Despite these precautions, it may be possible for unauthorized third parties to copy certain portions of the Company’s products or reverse engineer or obtain and use information the Company regards as proprietary. While the Company’s competitive position may be affected by its ability to protect its intellectual property rights, the Company believes that trademark and copyright protections are less significant to the Company’s success than other factors, such as the knowledge, ability, and experience of the Company’s personnel, name recognition, and ongoing product development and support. Further, certain provisions of the Company’s licenses, including provisions protecting against unauthorized use, copying, transfer, and disclosure of the licensed product, may be unenforceable under the laws of certain jurisdictions. In addition, the laws of some foreign countries do not protect the Company’s intellectual property rights to the same extent as do the laws of the U.S.

 

RISKS OF CLAIMS FROM THIRD PARTIES FOR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY INFRINGEMENT COULD ADVERSELY AFFECT THE BUSINESS.

 

As the number of software products in the industry increases and the functionality of these products further overlaps, the Company believes that software products will increasingly become subject to infringement claims. There can be no assurance that third parties will not assert infringement claims against the Company and/or

 

22


Table of Contents

against the Company’s suppliers of technology. In general, the Company’s suppliers have agreed to indemnify the Company in the event any such claim involves supplier-provided software or technology, but any such claim, whether or not involving a supplier, could require the Company to enter into royalty arrangements or result in costly litigation.

 

THE COMPANY’S BUSINESS MAY BE ADVERSELY AFFECTED BY EVENTS OUTSIDE THE COMPANY’S CONTROL.

 

While the Company has not been the target of software viruses specifically designed to impede the performance of the Company’s products, such viruses could be created and deployed against the Company’s products in the future. Similarly, experienced computer programmers or hackers could attempt to penetrate the Company’s network security or the security of the Company’s web sites. A hacker who penetrates the Company’s network or web sites could misappropriate proprietary information or cause interruptions of services. The Company might be required to expend significant capital and resources to protect against, or to alleviate, problems caused by virus creators and/or hackers. In addition, war, power shortage, natural disasters, acts of terror, and regional and global health risks could impact the Company’s ability to conduct business in certain regions. Any of these events could have an adverse effect on the Company’s business, results of operations, and financial condition.

 

THE COMPANY’S RESULTS OF OPERATIONS MAY BE AFFECTED BY FLUCTUATIONS IN FOREIGN CURRENCY EXCHANGE RATES.

 

Although the Company’s revenues are predominantly in U.S. dollars, substantial portions of the Company’s revenues are derived from sales to customers outside the United States. Trade sales to international customers represented 53%, 44% and 52% of total revenues for fiscal 2003, 2002 and 2001 respectively. The Company’s revenues can be affected by general economic conditions in the United States, Europe and other international markets. Also, portions of the Company’s operating expenses are transacted in foreign currencies. The Company’s operating strategy and pricing take into account changes in exchange rates over time. However, the Company’s results of operations may be significantly affected in the short term by fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates.

 

THE COMPANY’S RESULTS OF OPERATIONS MAY BE AFFECTED BY THE ASSESSMENT OF ADDITIONAL TAXES.

 

Tarantella has operations in many countries other than the United States. Transfer prices for services provided between the United States and these countries have been documented as reasonable, however, tax authorities could challenge these transfer prices and assess additional taxes on prior period transactions. Any such assessment could require the Company to record an additional tax provision in its statement of operations.

 

THE COMPANY’S SUCCESS LARGELY DEPENDS UPON ITS ABILITY TO RETAIN AND RECRUIT KEY PERSONNEL.

 

The Company’s continued success depends to a significant extent on senior management and other key employees. None of these individuals is subject to a long-term employment contract or a non-competition agreement. The loss of one or more key employees or the Company’s inability to attract and retain other key employees could have a material adverse effect on the Company.

 

THE COMPANY MAY NEVER ACHIEVE PROFITABILITY IN THE FUTURE.

 

Following the Company’s divestiture of its server software and professional services divisions in May 2001, the Company has not achieved profitability, and may never generate sufficient revenues to achieve profitability.

 

23


Table of Contents

THE OUTCOME OF SEC INQUIRY IS UNCERTAIN.

 

The Company is in contact with the Securities and Exchange Commission in connection with an informal inquiry related to the events leading up to the Company’s restatement. The Company cannot predict the outcome of this inquiry.

 

IF THE COMPANY IS UNABLE TO EFFECTIVELY INTEGRATE AND DEVELOP THE OPERATIONS OF NEW MOON SYSTEMS, INC. (“NEW MOON”), THE BUSINESS MAY SUFFER.

 

The Company acquired New Moon in June 2003. The Company intends to integrate the operations, certain employees, products and technology of New Moon into its own, and faces various risks as a result of this acquisition including, but not limited to:

 

    The ability to retain and motivate certain of New Moon’s employees;

 

    The ability to retain and develop New Moon’s customers;

 

    The failure to integrate the technology, operations and certain members of the workforce of New Moon with the Tarantella business;

 

    The failure to realize the potential financial or strategic benefits of the acquisition;

 

    The incurrence of substantial unanticipated integration costs;

 

    The diversion of significant management attention and financial resources in assimilating New Moon’s business;

 

    The disruption of the Company’s ongoing business.

 

If the Company is not able to successfully integrate and develop New Moon’s business, the Company’s business may be negatively affected in future periods, which may cause the stock price to decline. In addition, if the value of intangible assets and goodwill acquired becomes impaired, the Company will be required to write down the value of the assets, which would negatively affect financial results. The Company may incur liabilities from New Moon including liabilities for IP infringement or indemnification of New Moon’s customers for similar claims, which could materially and adversely affect the business.

 

THE COMPANY MAY MAKE FUTURE ACQUISITIONS THAT MAY RESULT IN ADDITIONAL RISKS.

 

The Company may continue to make investments in complementary companies, products or technologies. If the Company buys a company or a division of a company, they may experience difficulty integrating that company or division’s personnel and operations, which could negatively affect operating results. In addition:

 

    Key personnel of the acquired company may decide not to accept employment with the Company;

 

    The ongoing business may be disrupted or receive insufficient management attention;

 

    The Company may not be able to recognize the anticipated cost savings or other financial benefits;

 

In connection with future acquisitions, the Company may be required to assume the liabilities of the acquired companies. By assuming the liabilities, the Company may incur liabilities, including liabilities for IP infringement or indemnification of customers of acquired businesses for similar claims, which could materially and adversely affect the business. The Company may have to incur debt or issue equity securities to pay for any future acquisition, the issuance of which may involve restrictive covenants or be dilutive to existing shareholders.

 

24


Table of Contents

THE COMPANY’S STOCK IS SUBJECT TO SUBSTANTIAL PRICE AND VOLUME FLUCTUATIONS DUE TO A NUMBER OF FACTORS, MANY OF WHICH ARE BEYOND ITS CONTROL, AND THOSE FLUCTUATIONS MAY PREVENT SHAREHOLDERS FROM RESELLING THEIR COMMON STOCK AT A PROFIT.

 

The stock market in general, and the market for shares of technology companies in particular, has experienced extreme price and volume fluctuations, which have often been unrelated to the operating performance of the affected companies. Strategic factors such as new product introductions, acquisitions or restructurings by the Company or its competitors may have a significant impact on the market price of the Company’s common stock. Furthermore, quarter-to-quarter fluctuations in operating results may have a significant impact on the market price of the stock. These conditions, as well as factors that generally affect the market for stocks of high technology companies, could cause the price of the Company’s stock to fluctuate substantially over short periods.

 

THE COMPANY’S COMMON STOCK MAY BE DIFFICULT TO TRADE.

 

The Company’s stock was de-listed by the Nasdaq on October 21, 2003, and is now quoted on the Over-the-Counter (“OTC”) Pink Sheets. Trading the Company’s stock may be more difficult due to the limited trading activity on the OTC market. This could cause a further decline in the Company’s stock price. Declines in the market price of the Company’s stock could greatly impair the Company’s ability to raise capital through equity or debt financing.

 

FORMER NEW MOON SHAREHOLDERS WILL HAVE THE ABILITY TO SELL A LARGE NUMBER OF SHARES OF TARANTELLA COMMON STOCK, WHICH MAY CAUSE THE TRADING PRICE OF THE COMPANY’S COMMON STOCK TO DECLINE.

 

In connection with the acquisition of New Moon, the Company issued approximately 1,592,000 shares (calculated after the 1-for-5 reverse stock split which was implemented on June 6, 2003) of the Company’s common stock to former New Moon shareholders. During the one year period following the closing of the acquisition, the aggregate number of shares of common stock sold in any calendar quarter by each of the former New Moon shareholders shall not exceed 25% of the aggregate number of shares of common stock issued to such former New Moon shareholders pursuant to the acquisition; provided, however, that the percentage tradable in any calendar quarter shall be increased by an amount proportionate to the amount by which the trading volume of common stock exceeds 15,000,000 shares in the prior quarter. Furthermore, if the Company grants registration rights or issues shares of capital stock as part of a subsequent acquisition of the stock or assets of another company, and the sale of such stock is not subject to volume restrictions, then the 25% limitation described in the previous sentence will no longer be in effect. With the exception of the limitations set forth in this paragraph, the Company does not have any control over the timing of any sales by the former New Moon shareholders. As a result, the market price of the Company’s common stock may fall if a large portion of those shares is sold in the public market.

 

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

 

In June 2002, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (“SFAS”) No. 146, “Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities” (“SFAS 146”), which addresses financial accounting and reporting for costs associated with exit or disposal activities and nullifies Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) Issue No. 94-3, “Liability Recognition for Certain Employee Termination Benefits and Other Costs to Exit an Activity (including Certain Costs Incurred in a Restructuring)” (“EITF 94-3”). SFAS 146 requires that a liability for a cost associated with an exit or disposal activity be recognized when the liability is incurred. Under EITF 94-3, a liability for an exit cost, as defined in EITF 94-3, was recognized at the date of an entity’s commitment to an exit plan. SFAS 146 also establishes that the liability should initially be measured and recorded at fair value. The Company adopted the provisions of SFAS 146 for exit or disposal activities that are initiated after December 31, 2002. The adoption of SFAS 146 may affect the timing of recognizing future restructuring costs as well as the amounts recognized.

 

25


Table of Contents

In November 2002, FASB issued FASB Interpretation 45 (“FIN 45”), “Guarantor’s Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others”. The Interpretation elaborates on the existing disclosure requirements for most guarantees, including loan guarantees such as standby letters of credit. It also clarifies that at the time a company issues a guarantee, the company must recognize an initial liability for the fair value, or market value, of the obligations it assumes under the guarantee and must disclose that information in its interim and annual financial statements. The provisions related to recognizing a liability at inception of the guarantee for the fair value of the guarantor’s obligations do not apply to product warranties or to guarantees accounted for as derivatives. The initial recognition and initial measurement provisions apply on a prospective basis to guarantees issued or modified after December 31, 2002. The adoption of this statement did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial position or results of operations. The Company provides disclosures required by FIN 45 in Note 17.

 

In May 2003, the EITF reached a consensus on EITF Issue No. 00-21, “Revenue Arrangements with Multiple Deliverables”. This Issue addresses certain aspects of the accounting by a vendor for arrangements under which it will perform multiple revenue-generating activities. This Issue addresses when and how an arrangement involving multiple deliverables should be divided into separate units of accounting. The guidance in this Issue is effective for revenue arrangements entered into in fiscal periods beginning after June 15, 2003. The adoption of these provisions did not have a material effect on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.

 

In January 2003 the FASB issued FIN No. 46, “Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities” and a revised interpretation of FIN No. 46 (FIN No. 46-R”) in December 2003. FIN No. 46 requires certain variable interest entities to be consolidated by the primary beneficiary of the entity if the equity investors in the entity do not have the characteristics of a controlling financial interest or do not have sufficient equity at risk for the entity to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support from other parties. Should the Company form a variable interest entity, FIN No. 46-R will be effective at that time, but not later than the quarter ending March 31, 2004.

 

In May 2003, the FASB issued SFAS No. 150, “Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Characteristics of both Liabilities and Equity”. SFAS No. 150 establishes standards for how an issuer classifies and measures certain financial instruments with characteristics of both liabilities and equity. SFAS No. 150 is effective for financial instruments entered into or modified after May 31, 2003, and otherwise became effective for the Company July 1, 2003. The adoption of SFAS No. 150 did not have a material effect on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.

 

Item 7A.    Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

 

Market-Rate Sensitive Instruments and Risk Management

 

The Company is exposed to market risk related to changes in interest rates, foreign currency exchange rates, and equity security prices. It does not use derivative financial instruments for speculative or trading purposes.

 

Interest-Rate Risk

 

As of September 30, 2003 the Company had cash of $3.2 million, consisting of cash and highly liquid money market instruments with maturities of less than 90 days. Because of the short maturities of these instruments, a sudden change in market interest rates would not have a material impact on the fair value of the portfolio. The Company would not expect operating results or cash flows to be affected to any significant degree by the effect of a sudden change in market interest on its portfolio.

 

26


Table of Contents

Foreign Exchange Risks

 

Currently, the Company denominates sales to some European customers in Euro dollars and also incurs expenses related to its European operations in UK pounds and Euro dollars. Through May 2001, the Company used forward foreign exchange contracts to manage foreign exchange exposures associated with underlying assets, liabilities and anticipated transactions. Since the completion of the transaction in which the Company sold the Server Software and Professional Services divisions to Caldera International, the Company does not believe the foreign exchange risk is great enough to warrant the purchase of forward foreign exchange contracts.

 

Equity Security Price Risk

 

As of September 30, 2003 the Company has investments in Rainmaker Systems (Nasdaq: RMKR) and Netilla Networks (a privately-held company). The Company also has investments in other privately held companies, the carrying value of which is now zero. The Rainmaker investment is accounted for pursuant to FAS 115 in which equity gains and losses are recorded to a separate section of shareholders’ equity. The investment in Netilla has been impaired several times to the per share price of subsequent offerings. The Company does not hedge its investments in equity securities.

 

27


Table of Contents

Item 8.    Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

 

TARANTELLA, INC.

 

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

 

     Fiscal Years Ended September 30,

 
     2003

    

2002

(As restated,
see note 2)


     2001

 
     (In thousands, except per share data)  

Net revenues:

                          

Licenses

   $ 10,959      $ 11,354      $ 55,846  

Services

     3,047        2,866        10,816  
    


  


  


Total net revenues

     14,006        14,220        66,662  
    


  


  


Cost of revenues:

                          

Licenses

     324        327        8,346  

Services

     1,231        1,172        8,969  
    


  


  


Total cost of revenues

     1,555        1,499        17,315  
    


  


  


Gross margin

     12,451        12,721        49,347  
    


  


  


Operating expenses:

                          

Research and development

     4,280        5,641        18,439  

Selling, general and administrative

     15,186        19,564        64,266  

Restructuring charge

     2,246        2,299        1,019  
    


  


  


Total operating expenses

     21,712        27,504        83,724  
    


  


  


Operating loss

     (9,261 )      (14,783 )      (34,377 )
    


  


  


Other income (expense):

                          

Gain/(loss) on sale of divisions to Caldera

     —          (2,443 )      53,267  

Gain on sale of Caldera common stock

     —          4,491        —    

Loss and impairment of equity investment in Caldera

     —          (4,010 )      (27,066 )

Interest income, net

     46        518        1,118  

Other income/(expense), net

     (169 )      (1,040 )      253  
    


  


  


Total other income (expense)

     (123 )      (2,484 )      27,572  
    


  


  


Loss before income taxes

     (9,384 )      (17,267 )      (6,805 )
    


  


  


Provision for (benefit from) income taxes

     300        (1,076 )      (1,070 )
    


  


  


Net loss

     (9,684 )      (16,191 )      (5,735 )

Other comprehensive income (loss):

                          

Foreign currency translation adjustment

     27        163        33  
    


  


  


Unrealized gain (loss) on available for sale securities

     409        121        (3,567 )

Reclassification adjustment for gains included in net income

     —          —          (2,119 )
    


  


  


Net gain (loss) recognized in other comprehensive income

     409        121        (5,686 )
    


  


  


Total other comprehensive income (loss)

     436        284        (5,653 )
    


  


  


Comprehensive loss

   $ (9,248 )    $ (15,907 )    $ (11,388 )
    


  


  


Loss per share:

                          

Basic

   $ (1.10 )    $ (2.00 )    $ (0.72 )
    


  


  


Diluted

   $ (1.10 )    $ (2.00 )    $ (0.72 )
    


  


  


Shares used in loss per share calculation:

                          

Basic

     8,809        8,096        7,966  
    


  


  


Diluted

     8,809        8,096        7,966  
    


  


  


 

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

 

28


Table of Contents

TARANTELLA, INC.

 

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

 

     September 30,

 
     2003

   

2002

(As restated,

see note 2)


 
     (In thousands)  
ASSETS                 

Current assets:

                

Cash and cash equivalents

   $ 3,151     $ 7,055  

Trade receivables, net of allowances of $0.5 million and $0.3 million, respectively

     2,980       2,686  

Available-for-sale equity securities

     632       223  

Caldera and other receivables

     175       229  

Prepaids and other current assets

     720       780  
    


 


Total current assets

     7,658       10,973  
    


 


Property and equipment, net

     734       1,214  

Acquired intangible assets, net

     1,262       —    

Goodwill

     2,391       —    

Restricted cash

     —         500  

Other assets

     343       567  
    


 


Total assets

   $ 12,388     $ 13,254  
    


 


LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY                 

Current liabilities:

                

Trade payables

   $ 1,043     $ 448  

Line of credit

     319       —    

Royalties payable

     22       202  

Royalties payable—former New Moon shareholders

     1,725       —    

Income taxes payable

     549       581  

Other payables—Caldera

     —         400  

Accrued restructuring charges

     854       871  

Accrued expenses and other current liabilities

     3,615       3,963  

Deferred revenues

     1,757       945  
    


 


Total current liabilities

     9,884       7,410  
    


 


Long-term lease obligations

     —         —    

Long-term deferred revenues

     36       33  
    


 


Total long-term liabilities

     36       33  
    


 


Commitments and contingencies (note 10)

                

Shareholders’ equity:

                

Preferred stock, authorized 20,000 shares;
no shares issued and outstanding in 2003 and 2002

     —         —    

Common stock, no par value, authorized 100,000 shares;
issued and outstanding 11,959 and 8,206 shares at September 30, 2003 and September 30, 2002 respectively

     126,749       120,844  

Accumulated other comprehensive income

     553       117  

Accumulated deficit

     (124,834 )     (115,150 )
    


 


Total shareholders’ equity

     2,468       5,811  
    


 


Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity

   $ 12,388     $ 13,254  
    


 


 

 

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

 

29


Table of Contents

TARANTELLA, INC.

 

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

 

     Common Stock

    Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)


    Accumulated
Deficit


    Total
Shareholders’
Equity


 
     Shares

   Amount

       
     (In thousands)  

Balances, September 30, 2000

   7,887    $ 118,940     $ 5,486     $ (93,224 )   $ 31,202  
    
  


 


 


 


Common stock issuance under stock option and purchase plans

   136      1,176       —         —         1,176  

Unrealized loss on investment

   —        —         (5,686 )     —         (5,686 )

Stock compensation expense

   —        61       —         —         61  

Foreign currency translation

   —        —         33       —         33  

Warrants—Canopy Group

   —        969       —         —         969  

Warrants—Security Research

   —        (1,227 )     —         —         (1,227 )

Net loss

   —        —         —         (5,735 )     (5,735 )
    
  


 


 


 


Balances, September 30, 2001

   8,023    $ 119,919     $ (167 )   $ (98,959 )   $ 20,793  
    
  


 


 


 


Common stock issuance under stock option and purchase plans

   183      192       —         —         192  

Unrealized gain on investment

   —        —         121       —         121  

Stock compensation expense

   —        595       —         —         595  

Foreign currency translation

   —        —         163       —         163  

Warrants—Early Bird Capital

   —        138       —         —         138  

Net loss (As restated, see note 2)

   —        —         —         (16,191 )     (16,191 )
    
  


 


 


 


Balances, September 30, 2002
(As restated, see note 2)

   8,206    $ 120,844     $ 117     $ (115,150 )   $ 5,811  
    
  


 


 


 


Common stock issuance under stock option and purchase plans

   211      182       —         —         182  

Unrealized gain on investment

   —        —         409       —         409  

Stock compensation expense

   —        10       —         —         10  

Foreign currency translation

   —        —         27       —         27  

New Moon acquisition

   1,592      3,614                       3,614  

Private placement of common stock and warrants

   1,950      2,099                       2,099  

Net loss

   —        —         —         (9,684 )     (9,684 )
    
  


 


 


 


Balances, September 30, 2003

   11,959    $ 126,749     $ 553     $ (124,834 )   $ 2,468  
    
  


 


 


 


 

 

 

 

 

 

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

 

30


Table of Contents

TARANTELLA, INC.

 

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

 

     Fiscal Years Ended September 30,

 
     2003

   

2002

(As restated,

see note 2)


    2001

 
     (In thousands)  

Cash flows from operating activities:

                        

Net loss

   $ (9,684 )   $ (16,191 )   $ (5,735 )

Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used for operating activities—  

                        

Depreciation and amortization

     935       953       5,086  

Foreign currency exchange loss

     15       148       82  

Loss on disposal of property and equipment

     97       288       1,559  

(Gain) loss on sale of divisions to Caldera

     —         2,443       (53,267 )

Gain on sale of Caldera common stock

     —         (4,491 )     —    

Loss on equity investment in Caldera

     —         4,010       4,581  

Impairment of equity investment in Caldera

     —         —         22,485  

Gain on available-for-sale investments

     —         —         (2,118 )

Impairment of investments

     —         976       3,178  

Amortization of warrant and stock compensation expense

     10       733       (197 )

Changes in operating assets and liabilities—

                        

Trade receivables

     (193 )     1,017       11,475  

Other receivables

     54       7       —    

Other current assets

     151       (227 )     (579 )

Other assets

     724       (954 )     (279 )

Trade payables

     160       (378 )     (4,719 )

Royalties payable

     (180 )     (531 )     (1,139 )

Income taxes payable

     (32 )     207       (646 )

Accrued restructuring charges

     (17 )     527       (5,620 )

Accrued expenses and other current liabilities

     (1,610 )     (3,645 )     (164 )

Other payables—Caldera

     (400 )     —         —    

Deferred revenues

     703       (298 )     (5,096 )

Other long-term liabilities

     —         (1,760 )     (1,760 )
    


 


 


Net cash used for operating activities

     (9,267 )     (17,166 )     (32,873 )
    


 


 


Cash flows from investing activities:

                        

Purchases of short-term investments

     —         —         (33 )

Sales of short-term investments and marketable securities

     —         2,000       6,800  

Purchases of property and equipment

     (237 )     (200 )     (1,629 )

Purchases of software and technology licenses

     —         (9 )     (894 )

Acquisition of New Moon, net of cash acquired

     3,323       —         —    

Changes in New Moon royalty payable

     (102 )     —         —    

Sale of marketable securities

     —         1,531       215  

Proceeds from Caldera transaction

     —         9,042       20,493  
    


 


 


Net cash provided by investing activities

     2,984       12,364       24,952  
    


 


 


Cash flows from financing activities:

                        

Payments on capital lease obligations

     (230 )     (455 )     (1,891 )

Line of credit borrowings

     319       —         —    

Net proceeds from issuance of common stock

     182       192       1,176  

Proceeds from private placement of common stock and warrants

     2,099       —         —    
    


 


 


Net cash provided by (used for) financing activities

     2,370       (263 )     (715 )
    


 


 


Effects of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents

     9       20       (143 )
    


 


 


Decrease in cash and cash equivalents

     (3,904 )     (5,045 )     (8,779 )

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year

     7,055       12,100       20,879  
    


 


 


Cash and cash equivalents at end of year

   $ 3,151     $ 7,055     $ 12,100  
    


 


 


 

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

 

31


Table of Contents

TARANTELLA, INC.

 

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (continued)

 

    

Fiscal Years Ended September 30,


 
    

2003


  

2002

(As restated,

see note 2)


    2001

 
     (In thousands)  

Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:

                     

Cash paid—

                     

Income taxes

   $370    $ 565     $ 1,238  

Interest

   4      21       317  

Non-cash financing and investing activities—

                     

Warrants issued to Security Research

   —        —         (1,227 )

Warrants issued to Canopy

   —        —         969  

Warrants issued to Early Bird Capital

   —        138       —    

Stock compensation expense

   10      595       61  

Assets acquired under capital leases

   259      —         —    

Reconciliation of proceeds from Caldera transaction:

                     

Gain (loss) on sale of divisions to Caldera

   $ —      $ (2,443 )   $ 53,267  

Net assets sold

   —        —         3,494  

Discounted note receivable

   —        7,466       (6,828 )

Fair value of Caldera International common stock

   —        —         (29,440 )

Write off of tax reserve related to Caldera transaction

   —        (150 )     —    

Write off of royalty reserves related to Caldera transaction

   —        (345 )     —    

Write off of commission receivable related to Caldera transaction

   —        23       —    

Sale of Caldera International common stock

   —        4,491       —    
    
  


 


Cash proceeds from Caldera transaction

   $ —      $ 9,042     $ 20,493  
    
  


 


 

 

 

 

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

 

32


Table of Contents

TARANTELLA, INC.

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

Note 1—The Company

 

Tarantella, Inc. is a leading provider of Internet infrastructure software that enables web-based access to enterprise applications. The Tarantella Enterprise 3 solution instantly provides managed and secure web access to enterprise mainframe, Windows, AS/400, Linux, and UNIX applications. It leverages existing IT assets to provide cost savings, improved productivity, and the flexibility to accommodate the rapid changes in today’s organizations.

 

The Company was incorporated as The Santa Cruz Operation, Inc. (SCO) in California in 1979. On May 4, 2001, SCO completed the sale of its Server Software and Professional Services Divisions to Caldera Systems, Inc., retaining the Tarantella Division. A new company, Caldera International, was formed which combined the assets acquired from SCO with the assets of Caldera Systems. Upon the completion of the sale, SCO changed its corporate name to Tarantella, Inc.

 

Note 2—Restatement

 

Subsequent to the issuance of the Company’s consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2002, the three months ended December 31, 2002 and the three and six months ended March 31, 2003, the Company’s management determined that the accounting treatment initially afforded to certain transactions was not correct. As a result, the accompanying consolidated financial statements for the year ended September 30, 2002 have been restated as described below.

 

During the third quarter of fiscal 2003 the Company announced that it had become aware of business practices in the Company’s Northern European territory that required immediate changes in sales personnel within the region and certain internal controls. After conducting an internal review of certain transactions in the Northern European territory as well as other domestic and international transactions, the Company determined that it was necessary to restate revenues recorded in previous interim periods of fiscal 2003 and the fourth quarter of fiscal 2002. There were seven revenue transactions in Europe that did not sell out of the Company’s distributor, as the Company had believed. There were three revenue transactions totaling $0.2 million in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2002, two transactions totaling $0.2 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2003, and two transactions totaling $0.2 million in the second quarter of fiscal 2003. Since sales to distributors are recognized upon sell out by the distributor to resellers or end users, revenue for these transactions was reversed. Two of these transactions sold out of inventory in subsequent quarters and revenue was recognized and the products for five of these transactions have been returned to the Company.

 

There were also two additional transactions in the first quarter of fiscal 2003 in the United States totaling $0.2 million where the terms of the original transaction were amended. The amendment requires that the Company recognize such revenue no earlier than receipt of payment, which occurred in the third quarter of fiscal 2003 for both transactions.

 

In addition, as part of the internal revenue investigation, the Company determined that there was one revenue transaction in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2002 totaling $0.3 million, and two revenue transactions, one in the first quarter and one in the second quarter of fiscal 2003, totaling $0.2 million, for one customer, that should have been recorded when cash was received, as the customer’s ability to pay was not certain. One transaction was later paid through a barter transaction, however revenue was not recognized as the barter arrangement was determined to be a reciprocal arrangement. Two of these transactions remain unpaid and revenue will be recognized upon receipt of cash.

 

As a result of the reversal of these revenues in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2002, the first quarter of fiscal 2003 and the second quarter of fiscal 2003, there was also a reversal of the cost of goods sold, commission expense and cooperative (“COOP”) advertising expense associated with these revenues.

 

33


Table of Contents

TARANTELLA, INC.

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

Finally, the Company also determined that in the fourth quarter of 2002, it (i) had over accrued for commission and bonus expenses, (ii) it had underaccrued for miscellaneous expenses, and (iii) it had incorrectly recorded accelerated depreciation for an asset acquired. The depreciation error also impacted all of the quarters in fiscal 2003.

 

In addition, the Company has made certain reclassifications to the prior year financial statements. These reclassifications relate to the classification of customer credits issued and long-term deposits.

 

The balance sheet as of September 30, 2002, and the statements of operations and cash flows for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2002, and the quarterly reporting for the three months ended December 31, 2002 and March 31, 2003 have been restated in this Form 10-K.

 

The Company is in contact with the Securities & Exchange Commission in connection with an informal inquiry related to the events leading up to the Company’s restatement.

 

See note 21—Quarterly Reporting for further details of the effect of the re-statements on the quarterly results of operations.

 

A summary of the significant effects of the restatements on previously reported consolidated financial statements is as follows:

 

    

Fiscal Year Ended

September 30

2002


 
     As Previously
Reported*


   

As

Restated


 
    

(In thousands,

except per share data)

 

License revenues

   $ 11,850     $ 11,354  

Cost of license revenues

     337       327  

Research and development

     5,649       5,641  

Selling, general and administrative

     19,637       19,564  

Net loss

     (15,786 )     (16,191 )

Loss per share:

                

Basic and diluted

   $ (1.95 )   $ (2.00 )

 

    

September 30

2002


 
     As Previously
Reported*


   

As

Restated


 
     (In thousands)  

Trade receivables, net

   $ 3,045     $ 2,686  

Caldera and other receivables

     236       229  

Prepaids and other current assets

     823       780  

Total current assets

     11,382       10,973  

Property and equipment, net

     1,192       1,214  

Other assets

     524       567  

Total assets

     13,598       13,254  

Royalties payable

     212       202  

Accrued expenses and other current liabilities

     3,892       3,963  

Total current liabilities

     7,349       7,410  

Accumulated deficit

     (114,745 )     (115,150 )

Total shareholders’ equity

     6,216       5,811  

Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity

     13,598       13,254  

* Amounts as previously reported reflect reclassifications made to conform to current year presentation.

 

34


Table of Contents

TARANTELLA, INC.

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

Note 3—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

 

Principles of Consolidation.    The consolidated financial statements include the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries. All significant intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated on consolidation.

 

Use of Estimates.    The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“generally accepted accounting principles”) requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Such estimates include the allowances for bad debt, product returns and certain accrued expenses and liabilities, and a valuation allowance for deferred tax assets. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

 

Reclassifications.     Certain prior year reclassifications have been made for consistent presentation.

 

Cash Equivalents and Short-term Investments.    The Company considers all highly liquid investments with a maturity of 90 days or less at the date of acquisition to be cash equivalents. Short-term investments include instruments with lives ranging from 91 days to three years.

 

Investments.    The Company classifies its investments in certain equity securities in publicly traded companies as available-for-sale. Such investments are recorded at fair market value based on quoted market prices, and unrealized gains and losses are included in other comprehensive income. Unrealized gains on such investments were $409,000 as of September 30, 2003, and $121,000 as of September 30, 2002. As of September 30, 2001, unrealized losses were $5.7 million. The Company has investments in privately held companies that are classified as other assets. Realized gains and losses, which are calculated based on the specific identification method, are recorded in operations as incurred. Investments in privately held companies with less than 20% ownership are carried at the lower of cost or realizable value.

 

Credit Risk.    Financial instruments which potentially subject the Company to concentrations of credit risk consist primarily of cash equivalents, short-term investments and accounts receivable. Cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments consist primarily of cash accounts held at various banks, money market funds held at several financial institutions and a certificate of deposit. The Company sells its products to various organizations in different industries and geographies, and does not require collateral or other security to support accounts receivable. Credit risk is mitigated by the Company’s credit evaluation process and limited payment terms. In addition, the Company maintains an allowance for potential credit losses.

 

Property and Equipment.    Property and equipment are stated at cost and, except for assets recorded under capital lease and leasehold improvements, are depreciated using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets, ranging from three to five years. Leasehold improvements and assets recorded under capitalized leases are amortized using the straight-line method over the lesser of the remaining term of the lease or the estimated life of the asset, ranging from one to ten years.

 

Purchased Software and Technology Licenses.    Purchased software consists of core intellectual property rights owned by the Company. Technology licenses represent payments for the rights to use and integrate third party technology into the Company’s product offerings. Amounts capitalized are amortized on a straight-line basis over the estimated product life, ranging from three to ten years, or on the ratio of current revenues to total projected product revenues, whichever results in greater amortization.

 

35


Table of Contents

TARANTELLA, INC.

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

Accounting for Long-Lived Assets.    The Company reviews property, equipment, purchased software and technology licenses for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability is measured by comparison of its carrying amount to estimated future net cash flows the assets are expected to generate. If such assets are considered to be impaired, the impairment to be recognized is measured by the amount by which the carrying value of the asset exceeds the projected discounted future operating cash flows.

 

Goodwill and Intangible Assets.    As part of the New Moon Systems, Inc. (“New Moon “) acquisition in the third quarter of fiscal 2003, the Company allocated the purchase price to the tangible and intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their estimated fair values (see Note 15). A third-party appraisal firm assisted management in determining the fair values of the assets acquired and the liabilities assumed. Such valuations required management to make estimates and assumptions, especially with respect to intangible assets. Estimates associated with the accounting for the acquisition may change as additional acquisition cost information becomes available.

 

Critical estimates in valuing certain intangible assets include, but are not limited to: future expected cash flows from customer contracts, acquired developed technologies and patents; expected costs to develop the in-process research and development into commercially viable products and estimating cash flows from the projects when completed; and the trade name and the market position of the acquired products and assumptions about the period of time the trade name will continue to be used in the New Moon product portfolio. Management’s estimates of fair value are based upon assumptions believed to be reasonable.

 

In June 2001, the Financial Accounting Standard Board (“FASB”) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 141, Business Combinations, and SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets. SFAS No. 141 requires that all business combinations initiated after June 30, 2001 be accounted for under the purchase method and addresses the initial recognition and measurement of goodwill and other intangible assets acquired in a business combination. The provisions of SFAS No. 142 also require an annual goodwill impairment test. Management will perform the annual goodwill impairment test as of July 1, 2004 to determine if there is any goodwill impairment. Under SFAS 142, goodwill and intangible assets of a reporting unit shall be tested for impairment between annual tests if an event occurs or circumstances change that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of a reporting unit below its carrying amount. The Company believes that there has been no event as of September 30, 2003, that reduced the fair value of our reporting unit below the goodwill and intangible assets carrying amounts.

 

Software Development Costs.    SFAS No. 86 provides for the capitalization of certain software development costs once technological feasibility is established. Capitalized costs are then amortized on a straight-line basis over the estimated product life, or on the ratio of current revenues to total projected product revenues, whichever is greater. Through September 30, 2003, the Company believes its process for developing software was essentially completed concurrent with the establishment of technological feasibility, and accordingly, no software development costs have been capitalized to date.

 

At each balance sheet date the Company compares the unamortized balance of purchased software and technology with its net realizable value. Any amount by which the unamortized balance exceeds the net realizable value is written off. The net realizable value is calculated as the estimated future gross revenues from the product reduced by the estimated future costs of completing and disposing of that product, including the costs of performing the maintenance and customer support required to satisfy the Company’s responsibility set forth at the time of the sale.

 

Revenue Recognition.    The Company’s revenue is derived primarily from two sources, across many industries: (i) products license revenue, derived primarily from product sales to resellers and end users, including

 

36


Table of Contents

TARANTELLA, INC.

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

large scale enterprises and royalty revenue, derived primarily from initial license fees and ongoing royalties from product sales by source code OEMs; and (ii) services and support revenue, derived primarily from providing software updates, support, education and consulting services to end users.

 

The Company accounts for revenue under the provisions of AICPA Statement of Position (“SOP”) 97-2, Software Revenue Recognition, as amended. Product revenue is recognized upon shipment if evidence of an arrangement exists, the fee is fixed and determinable and collection of resulting receivables is probable. Sales to distributors are recognized upon sale by the distributor to resellers or end users. In certain instances when distributors waive their right to return product, revenue is recognized upon shipment if evidence of an arrangement exists, the fee is fixed and determinable and collection of resulting receivables is probable. Estimated product returns are recorded upon recognition of revenue from customers having rights of return, including exchange rights for unsold products and product upgrades.

 

Until May 2001, the Company sold two types of software products, UNIX-based operating system software, which was sold under the UnixWare and OpenServer names, and application broker software sold under the Tarantella name. In May 2001, the Company sold the UNIX-based business to Caldera Systems, Inc.

 

The Company sold UnixWare and OpenServer products separately and as a result, for contracts involving the sale of UnixWare and OpenServer that contained multiple obligations (e.g. delivered and undelivered products, maintenance and other services), the Company allocated revenue to each component of the contract based on objective evidence of its fair value, which is specific to the Company. The fair value of each element is based on the price as sold separately. The Company recognized revenue allocated to undelivered products when the criteria for product revenue set forth above was met.

 

For multiple element contracts involving the sale of the Tarantella product the Company uses the residual value method to allocate revenue to each component. The fair value of services and post contract support is determined based upon separate sales and renewal rates set forth in the contract, respectively.

 

The Company recognizes revenue from maintenance fees for ongoing customer support and product updates ratably over the period of the maintenance contract. Payments for maintenance fees are generally made in advance and are non-refundable. For revenue allocated to education and consulting services or derived from the separate sale of such services, the Company recognizes revenue as the related services are performed.

 

The Company recognizes product revenue from royalty payments upon receipt of quarterly royalty reports from OEMs (original equipment manufacturers) related to their product sales.

 

The Company performs ongoing credit evaluations of its customers’ financial condition and does not require collateral. The Company maintains allowances for potential credit losses and such losses have been within management’s expectations.

 

Advertising.    The Company expenses advertising costs as incurred. The majority of advertising expense relates to the Company reimbursing certain qualified customers for a portion of the advertising costs related to their promotion of the Company’s products. The Company’s maximum liability for reimbursement is accrued at the time revenue is recognized as a percentage of the qualified customer’s net revenue derived from the Company’s products. For 2003, 2002 and 2001, advertising expense totaled approximately $0.4 million, $0.2 million, and $2.1 million, respectively.

 

Income Taxes.    The Company records income taxes using an asset and liability approach that results in the recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of events that have been recognized in the Company’s consolidated financial statements or tax returns. In estimating future tax consequences, all expected future events other than enactment of changes in tax laws are considered. When

 

37


Table of Contents

TARANTELLA, INC.

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

necessary, a valuation allowance is recorded to reduce tax assets to an amount for which realization is more likely than not. The provision for income taxes represents taxes payable for the current period, plus the net change in deferred tax amounts.

 

Stock Based Compensation.    The Company accounts for stock-based compensation arrangements under the provisions of Accounting Principles Board (“APB”) Opinion No. 25 “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees” for its fixed stock option plan and employee stock purchase plan and accordingly, has not recognized compensation cost in the accompanying consolidated statement of operations for options issued at fair value. SFAS 123 permits the use of either a fair value based method or the intrinsic value method to measure the expense associated with stock-based compensation arrangements. For options granted below fair value, the Company recorded a stock compensation charge of $0.6 million. None of these charges were recorded in cost of goods sold.

 

In accordance with the disclosure provisions of SFAS 148, the pro forma effect on the Company’s net loss had compensation expense been recorded for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2003, September 30, 2002 and September 30, 2001, respectively, as determined under the fair value method, is shown below (in thousands, except per share amounts):

 

    

Fiscal Years Ended September 30,


 
     2003

    2002

    2001

 
     (In thousands, except per share)  

Net loss, as reported

   $ (9,684 )   $ (16,191 )   $ (5,735 )

Add: Stock-based employee compensation expense included in reported net loss

     10       595       61  

Less: Total stock-based employee compensation expense determined under fair value based method for all awards

     (5,238 )     (6,069 )     (7,269 )
    


 


 


Pro forma net loss

   $ (14,912 )   $ (21,665 )   $ (12,943 )
    


 


 


Basic and diluted net loss per share:

                        

As reported

   $ (1.10 )   $ (2.00 )   $ (0.72 )
    


 


 


Pro forma

   $ (1.69 )   $ (2.68 )   $ (1.62 )
    


 


 


 

The fair value of the options granted under the Option Plan and the Director Plan were estimated at the date of grant using a Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following weighted-average assumptions for 2003, 2002, and 2001: risk-free interest rate of 2.64% for fiscal 2003, 3.73% for 2002 and 4.91% for 2001; dividend yield of 0%; volatility factor of the expected market price of the Company’s common stock of 100% for 2003, 94% for 2002 and 87.5% for 2001; an average turnover rate of 15% and 0% and a four year and five year expected life for options granted to employees and executives, respectively.

 

The fair value for the Employee Stock Purchase Plan rights were also estimated at the date of grant using a Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following assumptions for 2003, 2002 and 2001: risk-free interest rates of 1.42%, 2.09% and 4.74%, respectively; dividend yield of 0%; volatility factor of 107% for 2003, 94% for 2002 and 87.5% for 2001; and six month expected life. The weighted average fair value of the ESPP rights granted in 2003, 2002, and 2001 was $0.37, $0.27 and $1.02 per share, respectively.

 

Computation of Earnings (Loss) Per Share.    Basic earnings (loss) per share is computed by dividing income available to common shareholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted earnings (loss) per share is computed by giving effect to all dilutive potential common shares that were outstanding during the period. For the Company, dilutive potential common shares consist of the

 

38


Table of Contents

TARANTELLA, INC.

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

incremental common shares issuable upon the exercise of stock options and warrants for all periods. All potentially dilutive securities have been excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per share as their affect is anti-dilutive on the loss from operations for all periods presented. The potentially dilutive securities are as follows:

 

     September 30,

     2003

   2002

   2001

     (In thousands)

Options and warrants outstanding not included in computation of diluted loss per share because the exercise price was greater than the average market price.

   4,033    1,823    1,796

Options and warrants outstanding not included in computation of diluted loss per share because their inclusion would have been anti-dilutive.

   1,203    737    482

 

Segment Information.    The Company operates and is managed internally as one operating segment in accordance with SFAS No. 131, “Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information.” Operating segments are defined as components of an enterprise about which separate financial information is available that is evaluated regularly by the chief operating decision maker, or decision making group, in deciding how to allocate resources and in assessing performance. The Company’s chief operating decision maker is the Chief Executive Officer of the Company.

 

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

 

In June 2002, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued “SFAS” No. 146, “Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities” (“SFAS 146”), which addresses financial accounting and reporting for costs associated with exit or disposal activities and nullifies Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) Issue No. 94-3, “Liability Recognition for Certain Employee Termination Benefits and Other Costs to Exit an Activity (including Certain Costs Incurred in a Restructuring)” (“EITF 94-3”). SFAS 146 requires that a liability for a cost associated with an exit or disposal activity be recognized when the liability is incurred. Under EITF 94-3, a liability for an exit cost, as defined in EITF 94-3, was recognized at the date of an entity’s commitment to an exit plan. SFAS 146 also establishes that the liability should initially be measured and recorded at fair value. The Company adopted the provisions of SFAS 146 for exit or disposal activities that are initiated after December 31, 2002. The adoption of SFAS 146 may affect the timing of recognizing future restructuring costs as well as the amounts recognized.

 

In November 2002, FASB issued FASB Interpretation 45 (“FIN 45”), “Guarantor’s Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others”. The Interpretation elaborates on the existing disclosure requirements for most guarantees, including loan guarantees such as standby letters of credit. It also clarifies that at the time a company issues a guarantee, the company must recognize an initial liability for the fair value, or market value, of the obligations it assumes under the guarantee and must disclose that information in its interim and annual financial statements. The provisions related to recognizing a liability at inception of the guarantee for the fair value of the guarantor’s obligations do not apply to product warranties or to guarantees accounted for as derivatives. The initial recognition and initial measurement provisions apply on a prospective basis to guarantees issued or modified after December 31, 2002. The adoption of this statement did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial position or results of operations. The Company provides disclosures required by FIN 45 in Note 17.

 

In May 2003, the EITF reached a consensus on EITF Issue No. 00-21, “Revenue Arrangements with Multiple Deliverables”. This Issue addresses certain aspects of the accounting by a vendor for arrangements under which it will perform multiple revenue-generating activities. This Issue addresses when and how an arrangement involving multiple deliverables should be divided into separate units of accounting. The guidance in

 

39


Table of Contents

TARANTELLA, INC.

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

this Issue is effective for revenue arrangements entered into in fiscal periods beginning after June 15, 2003. The adoption of these provisions did not have a material effect on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.

 

In January 2003 the FASB issued FIN No. 46, “Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities” and a revised interpretation of FIN No. 46 (FIN No. 46-R”) in December 2003. FIN No. 46 requires certain variable interest entities to be consolidated by the primary beneficiary of the entity if the equity investors in the entity do not have the characteristics of a controlling financial interest or do not have sufficient equity at risk for the entity to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support from other parties. Should the Company form a variable interest entity, FIN No. 46-R will be effective at that time, but not later than the quarter ending March 31, 2004.

 

In May 2003, the FASB issued SFAS No. 150, “Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Characteristics of both Liabilities and Equity”. SFAS No. 150 establishes standards for how an issuer classifies and measures certain financial instruments with characteristics of both liabilities and equity. SFAS No. 150 is effective for financial instruments entered into or modified after May 31, 2003, and otherwise became effective for the Company July 1, 2003. The adoption of SFAS No. 150 did not have a material effect on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.

 

Foreign Currency Translation.    The functional currency of the Company’s foreign subsidiaries is the local foreign currency. All assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are translated into U.S. dollars at the exchange rate prevailing on the balance sheet date. Revenues, costs and expenses are translated at average rates of exchange prevailing during the period. Translation adjustments resulting from translation of the subsidiaries’ accounts are accumulated as a separate component of shareholders’ equity. Gains and losses resulting from foreign currency transactions are included in the consolidated statements of operations and have not been significant.

 

Fair Value of Financial Instruments.    Carrying amounts of certain of the Company’s financial instruments, including cash and cash equivalents, receivables, accounts payable, accrued payroll and other accrued liabilities, approximate fair value because of their short maturities. The fair values of investments are determined using quoted market prices for those securities or similar financial instruments. The fair value of other long-term liabilities approximates the carrying value due to the market interest rates that these obligations bear.

 

Note 4—Cash and Cash Equivalents

 

     September 30,

     2003

   2002

     (In thousands)

Bank demand deposits

   $ 3,151    $ 1,538

Money market accounts

     —        5,517
    

  

     $ 3,151    $ 7,055
    

  

 

Note 5— Investments

 

In fiscal 2002 and 2001, the Company had realized gains from investments of $4.5 million and $2.1 million, respectively. There were no realized gains or losses from investments in fiscal 2003.

 

 

40


Table of Contents

TARANTELLA, INC.

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

In November 1996, the Company purchased $2.0 million of convertible debentures from a domestic distribution channel partner. In February 1999, the Company elected to convert, in its entirety, the debenture into shares of preferred stock. In January 2000 the Company redeemed 68,805 shares at their cost of $2.181 per share. After the redemption the Company had 848,259 shares of preferred stock at a cost of $1.85 million. On January 4, 2001 the channel distribution partner was purchased by Ebiz Enterprises, Inc., and the Company received 2,367,999 shares of Ebiz common stock.

 

In March 2000, the Company purchased $2.0 million of preferred stock in a private Linux distribution company. On October 5, 2000 this company was purchased by Ebiz Enterprises, Inc. The Company received 2,208,749 shares of Ebiz common stock and 787,878 warrants to purchase shares.

 

During the quarter ended June 30, 2001, the Company determined the decline in the fair value of its investment in Ebiz was other than temporary and thus required a permanent write-down of the investment by $1.5 million.

 

At September 30, 2002, the Company had written off all receivables related to Ebiz since they were no longer in business. At September 30, 2001, the Company had gross accounts receivable with Ebiz of $1.1 million. This amount was fully reserved as Ebiz declared bankruptcy on September 7, 2001, and did not have the ability to pay. There were no sales to this related party in fiscal 2003. Sales to this related party were $25,398 for fiscal 2002 and $2.0 million for fiscal 2001. Sales in fiscal 2001 included product and services sold to the Company’s channel distribution partner prior to its acquisition by Ebiz.

 

In January 1995, the Company purchased 10% of the preferred stock of Rainmaker Systems, Inc. (“Rainmaker”), another of the Company’s domestic distribution partners, in exchange for cash, product and equipment valued at $1.0 million. In addition, the Company loaned $1.0 million to Rainmaker in exchange for convertible debentures. In February 1999, the Company exchanged the preferred stock and debentures for shares of Series D Convertible Participating Preferred Stock (the “Series D Preferred”). During fiscal year 1999, the Company sold approximately 1,704,011 shares of Series D with a cost basis of $0.6 million, and received cash proceeds of $3.8 million. The Company’s interest of ownership of Rainmaker before and after the sale was 15.3% and 10.3% respectively. On November 17, 1999, Rainmaker completed an initial public offering of its common stock, at which time, the shares of Series D Preferred held by the Company automatically converted into shares of Rainmaker’s common stock on a one-for-one basis. At September 30, 2003 and September 30, 2002, the Company held 505,767 shares of Rainmaker’s common stock. The Company accounts for these shares as available-for-sale securities and records them at fair market value, based on quoted market prices with any unrealized gains or losses included as part of accumulated other comprehensive income. During fiscal 2003 and fiscal 2002, the Company did not sell any shares of Rainmaker stock. During fiscal 2001, the Company sold 3,200,000 shares of Rainmaker stock with a cost basis of $1.1 million, and received cash proceeds of $3.2 million.

 

The fair value of the Company’s investment in Rainmaker at September 30, 2003 was $632,000 and cost was $171,000 for an unrealized gain of $461,000. Rainmaker’s common stock is traded on the Nasdaq under the symbol “RMKR.” The Company no longer has the right to appoint a member to the Board of Directors.

 

At September 30, 2003 and September 30, 2002, the Company did not have any accounts receivable from Rainmaker. There were no sales to Rainmaker in fiscal 2003 and fiscal 2002. Sales to Rainmaker were $3.7 million for fiscal 2001.

 

41


Table of Contents

TARANTELLA, INC.

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

Note 6—Related Parties

 

     September 30,

     2003

   2002

   2001

     (In thousands)

Net Revenues:

                    

License, third parties

   $ 10,959    $ 10,808    $ 50,455

License, related parties

     —        546      5,391

Service, third parties

     3,047      2,556      9,058

Service, related parties

     —        310      1,758
    

  

  

Total net revenues

   $ 14,006    $ 14,220    $ 66,662
    

  

  

 

There were no related party revenues for fiscal 2003. Related party revenues for fiscal 2002 were sales to two companies in which the Company had significant investments. In fiscal 2001, related party revenues were sales to five companies in which the Company had significant investments. There were no related party receivables at September 30, 2003 or 2002.

 

There are three partners in Encinal Partnership No. 1 (“EP1”), the J3D Family Limited Partnership, the Lawrence Michels Family Limited Partnership and Wave Crest Development, Inc. EP1 leases certain office premises located in Santa Cruz, California to the Company. Doug Michels, who has been a director of the Company since 1979, and also served as the Chief Executive Officer of the Company from April 1998 to December 2003, is the general partner of both the J3D Family Limited Partnership and the Lawrence Michels Family Limited Partnership. From time to time, Mr. Michels also engages in real estate transactions with Wave Crest and its president. The current lease commenced on January 1, 1989 and had a ten-year term, with two options for the Company to renew for five-year periods. The lease has been renewed through June 30, 2005. The lease covers approximately 50,830 square feet of building space at a current cost of approximately $95,155 per month, subject to an annual adjustment upward based on the Consumer Price Index. Rents paid to these related parties were $1.0 million, $1.1 million and $1.4 million for the fiscal years 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively.

 

The Company believes that the transactions described above were on terms no less favorable to the Company than could have been obtained from unaffiliated third parties. All future transactions between the Company and any director or executive officer are subject to approval by a majority of the disinterested members of the Board of Directors.

 

Note 7—Property and Equipment

 

     September 30,

 
     2003

    2002

 
     (In thousands)  

Computer and office equipment

   $ 2,429     $ 2,645  

Furniture and fixtures

     760       835  

Leasehold improvements

     1,582       1,738  

Purchased software and technology licenses, at cost

     855       846  
    


 


       5,626       6,064  

Less accumulated depreciation and amortization

     (4,892 )     (4,850 )
    


 


     $ 734     $ 1,214  
    


 


 

42


Table of Contents

TARANTELLA, INC.

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

Depreciation and amortization expense was $0.9, $1.0 million and $5.1 million during fiscal 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively. During fiscal 2001, the Company sold net property and equipment of $8.4 million to Caldera as part of the sale of the Server and Professional Services divisions. During fiscal 2003, the Company purchased property and equipment of $0.1 million as part of the acquisition of New Moon. The majority of the assets purchased had useful lives of one year or less at the time of purchase.

 

Note 8—Line of Credit

 

At September 30, 2003, the Company had a $1.5 million bank line of credit, against which $0.3 million was outstanding. The credit agreement provides that the Company may borrow up to $1.5 million at 2.5% per month based on 75% of eligible accounts receivable. The line of credit has no financial covenants and is secured by the assets of the Company. As of September 30, 2002, there was no line of credit available.

 

Note 9—Accrued Express and Other Current Liabilities

 

     September 30,

     2003

   2002

     (In thousands)

Accrued wages, commissions, bonuses

   $ 1,176    $ 1,536

Accrued fringe benefits

     250      502

Accrued advertising

     467      247

Customer deposits

     353      388

Capital lease obligations

     31      2

Other accrued expenses

     1,338      1,288
    

  

     $ 3,615    $ 3,963
    

  

 

Note 10—Commitments and Contingencies

 

Lease Commitments.    Future minimum lease payments under non-cancelable operating leases, net of sublease rent to be received (with initial or remaining lease terms in excess of one year) and future minimum capital lease payments as of September 30, 2003 were as follows:

 

    

Capital

Leases


  

Operating

Leases


     (In thousands)

Year Ending September 30,

             

2004

   $ 32    $ 1,316

2005

     —        1,570

2006

     —        359

2007

     —        345

2008

     —        463

Later years, through 2020

     —        6,284
    

  

Total minimum lease payments

     32    $ 10,337
           

Less amount representing interest

     1       
    

      

Present value of net minimum capital lease payments—current

   $ 31       
    

      

 

The cost of assets recorded under capital leases was $64,754 and $19,820 at September 30, 2003 and 2002, respectively. Accumulated amortization on those dates was $38,152 and $17,618, respectively. Rent expense amounted to approximately $1.6 million, $2.0 million, and $4.9 million in fiscal 2003, 2002, and 2001, respectively.

 

43


Table of Contents

TARANTELLA, INC.

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

Included in the Company’s operating lease commitments are facilities leased from Encinal Partnership No. 1, a partnership which includes Doug Michels, the Company’s former President and Chief Executive Officer, and currently a director of the Company (see note 6). The remaining lease term of this facility is through June 2005. Rent expense for this facility amounted to approximately $1.0 million in fiscal 2003, $1.1 million in fiscal 2002, and $1.4 million in fiscal 2001.

 

Note 11—Shareholders’ Equity

 

Preferred Stock.    The Company is authorized to issue 20,000,000 shares of Preferred Stock. As of September 30, 2003, there were no shares of Preferred Series stock either issued or outstanding.

 

Employee Stock Purchase Plan.    The Company has an Employee Stock Purchase Plan (“ESPP”) for all eligible employees which is administered by the Board of Directors. Under the ESPP, shares of the Company’s common stock may be purchased at six-month intervals at 85% of the fair market value on the first or last day of each six-month period whichever is lower. Employees may purchase shares through payroll deductions of up to 10% of gross compensation during an offering period. During 2003, 2002 and 2001, employees purchased 81,972, 123,814 and 134,119 shares at an average per share price of $0.72, $1.34 and $8.60, respectively. The number of shares reserved for issuance under the ESPP was increased by 250,000 shares in February, 2002. The number of shares reserved for future issuance as of September 30, 2003 was 83,509.

 

2004 Incentive Stock Option Plan.    As of September 30, 2003, the Company had authorized 4,302,733 shares of Common Stock for issuance under the 2004 Incentive Stock Option Plan (the “Option Plan”). The Company’s Board of Directors administers the Option Plan and determines the terms of the options granted under the Option Plan, including the exercise price, number of shares subject to each option and the exercisability thereof. In addition, the stock option committee of the Company’s Board of Directors is authorized to grant up to 10,000 shares to an individual employee or consultant under the terms of the Option Plan during a one-year period. As of September 30, 2003 there were 314,008 shares available for issuance.

 

The exercise price of all incentive options granted under the Option Plan must be at least equal to the fair market value. Options granted under the Option Plan prior to January 31, 1996 generally become exercisable over a five-year period. Effective January 31, 1996, the vesting period for subsequent grants was changed to four years. The term of each option is ten years.

 

2003 Stock Plan.    On April 2, 2003, the Board of Directors adopted the 2003 Stock Plan and authorized 200,000 shares of Common Stock for issuance under the plan. The Company’s Board of Directors administers the Option Plan and determines the terms of the options granted under the Option Plan, including the exercise price, number of shares subject to each option and the exercisability thereof. As of September 30, 2003 there were 96,000 shares available for issuance.

 

Options granted under the 2003 Stock Plan generally become exercisable over a four-year period. The term of each option is ten years.

 

Director Option Plan.    The Company’s Director Option Plan (the “Director Plan”) provides for the granting of non-statutory stock options to non-employee directors of the Company and is administered by the Board of Directors. As of September 30, 2003 there were 197,000 shares available for issuance. Options granted under the Director Plan have a term of ten (10) years unless terminated sooner upon termination of the optionee’s status as a director or otherwise pursuant to the Director Plan. Such options are not transferable by the optionee other than by will or the laws of descent or distribution, and each option is exercisable during the lifetime of the director only by such director. The exercise price of each option granted under the Director Plan is equal to the fair market value of the Common Stock on the date of grant. Initial Grant options granted under the Director Plan vest over five years and annual Grant options vest over one year.

 

44


Table of Contents

TARANTELLA, INC.

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

In fiscal 2002 there were 4,470,880 options granted at below fair value. A summary of the status of the Company’s stock option plans as of September 30, 2003, 2002, and 2001, and changes during the years then ended is presented below:

 

The following table summarizes information about stock options outstanding at September 30, 2003:

 

     2003

   2002

   2001

Option and Director Plans


   Shares

   

Weighted-

Average

Exercise

Price


   Shares

   

Weighted-

Average

Exercise

Price


   Shares

   

Weighted-

Average

Exercise

Price


     (In thousands)

Outstanding at beginning of year

   2,294     $ 14.28    1,793     $ 110.50    2,373     $ 33.00

Granted

   998       1.19    910       1.20    786       9.50

Exercised

   (129 )     0.95    (58 )     0.45    (2 )     9.15

Cancelled

   (427 )     5.93    (351 )     22.70    (1,364 )     33.80
    

        

        

     

Outstanding at end of year

   2,736       10.90    2,294       14.28    1,793       22.10
    

        

        

     

Options exercisable at end of year

   2,058       12.96    1,449       16.60    855       27.20

Weighted-average fair value of options granted during the year, using black-scholes calculation

         $ 0.81          $ 1.40          $ 6.35

 

Range of Exercise Price


   Outstanding

  

Weighted-
Average

Remaining

Contractual Life


   

Weighted-
Average

Exercise Price


  

Exercisable


  

Weighted-
Average

Exercise Price


     (In thousands)

$    0.45 – 0.45

   341    7.7  years   $     0.45    341    $     0.45

      0.70 – 0.91

   258    9.1       0.89    53      0.88

      1.10 – 1.30

   462    7.9       1.11    417      1.11

      1.75 – 2.45

   455    7.9       1.95    207      1.82

      2.80 – 2.80

   1    8.1       2.80    1      2.80

      6.41 – 9.50

   327    6.8       8.38    213      8.38

    10.55 – 15.63

   215    6.0       13.82    177      13.84

    16.09 – 23.75

   184    4.4       20.87    170      21.03

    24.38 – 33.13

   336    3.6       27.50    336      27.50

    40.63 – 59.69

   102    5.9       47.05    95      47.19

    65.63 – 92.50

   54    5.4       82.45    48      82.45

  156.25 – 156.25

   1    6.3       156.25    —        156.25
    
               
      

$    0.45 – 156.25

   2,736    6.8  years   $   10.90    2,058    $   12.96
    
               
      

 

Common Stock Repurchases.    The Company repurchases its common stock on the open market, both systematically and non-systematically. Under the systematic stock repurchase plan, shares of common stock are repurchased to help negate the dilutive effects of the Incentive Stock Option Plan and the Employee Stock Purchase Plan. Under the non-systematic repurchase plan, the Company may repurchase up to 1,200,000 shares of its common stock. During the fiscal years ended September 30, 2003, 2002 and 2001, the Company did not repurchase any shares under either plan.

 

Shareholder Rights.    In September 1997, the Company adopted a Shareholder Rights Plan which provides existing shareholders with the right to purchase a partial share of preferred stock for each share of common stock

 

45


Table of Contents

TARANTELLA, INC.

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

owned by the shareholder in the event of certain changes in the Company’s ownership. These rights may serve as a deterrent to certain takeover attempts not approved by the Company’s Board of Directors. The rights expire in September 2007.

 

Warrants.    During fiscal 2001, in connection with a line of credit, the Company issued warrants to purchase 1,440,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $1.5625 per share. The warrants expired on January 8, 2003. The Company recorded a liability of $969,000 for this warrant, and amortized the related expense over one year, the vesting period of the warrant.

 

During fiscal 2002, in connection with financial consulting and investment banking advice, the Company issued warrants to purchase 400,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $0.44 per share. The warrants expire on April 22, 2006. The Company recorded a one-time charge of $138,000 in fiscal 2002 for this warrant.

 

Private Placement Financing.    On September 30, 2003, the Company completed a private placement of common stock and warrants to Special Situations Technology Funds and Vertical Ventures resulting in gross proceeds to the Company of approximately $2,254,200 for which the Company paid fees of $155,345. The Company issued 1,950,000 shares of common stock at a price of $1.156 and warrants to purchase 1,950,000 shares of common stock at $1.395 per share. The warrants have a value of $895,592, based on the relative fair value using a Black-Scholes calculation, using a volatility of 100%, an annual dividend of zero and a discount rate of 2.63%. The Company can require the warrant holders to exercise one-third of the warrants provided the shares issuable thereunder are registered with the SEC and the share price equals or exceeds $1.674 for a period of twenty consecutive trading days. In addition, the Company can redeem up to two-thirds of the warrants or all of the warrants for $0.01 per share should the closing bid price of the shares reach the target prices of $2.232 and $2.790, respectively. The warrant holders may exercise the warrants prior to redemption. The warrants expire on September 30, 2008. If the warrants are fully exercised, the Company would receive additional gross proceeds of approximately $2,700,000. The Company also has agreed to register the shares of common stock issued to the investors as well as the shares issuable upon exercise of the warrants for resale once the Company has complied with its reporting obligations under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. If the shares and warrants are not registered in a timely manner, the Company will be obligated to pay damages for the delay, in an amount equal to one-percent per month of the aggregate amount invested, until registered. See Note 23 for details on private placements completed after September 30, 2003.

 

Note 12—Income Taxes

 

Loss before income taxes for fiscal 2003, 2002 and 2001 includes foreign pretax profit of approximately $0.1 million, $0.1 million and $2.6 million respectively.

 

The components of income taxes are as follows:

 

    

Fiscal Year Ended September 30,


 
    

2003


     2002

     2001

 
     (In thousands)  

Current:

                        

Federal

   $ —        $ (259 )    $ —    

State

   —          —          —    

Foreign

   300        (817 )      (1,070 )
    
    


  


Total current

   300        (1,076 )      (1,070 )
    
    


  


Deferred

   —          —          —    
    
    


  


Total

   $300      $ (1,076 )    $ (1,070 )
    
    


  


 

46


Table of Contents

TARANTELLA, INC.

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

Income taxes differ from the amount computed by applying the statutory federal income tax rate to loss before income taxes as follows:

 

     Fiscal Year Ended September 30,

 
     2003

    2002

    2001

 
     (In thousands)  

Statutory federal income tax benefit at 34%

   $ (3,191 )   $ (5,871 )   $ (2,314 )

State income tax, net of federal effect

     —         —         —    

Foreign taxes less related tax benefit, if any

     317       (619 )     (1,530 )

Losses and expenses without tax benefit, including valuation allowances

     3,174       5,414       2,774  

Net deferred tax asset charge

     —         —         —    
    


 


 


     $ 300     $ (1,076 )   $ (1,070 )
    


 


 


 

The tax effect of temporary differences that give rise to significant portions of the deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities are as follows:

 

     September 30,

 
     2003

    2002

 
     (In thousands)  

Deferred tax assets:

                

Investment reserves

   $ 644     $ 586  

Accruals and reserve accounts

     1,587       1,455  

Property, equipment and software

     5,783       4,839  

Net operating loss carryforward

     42,924       40,591  

Capital loss carryforward

     24,496       24,496  

Research credit

     8,850       9,042  

Other credits

     669       1,829  
    


 


Total gross deferred tax assets

     84,953       82,838  

Less valuation allowance

     (84,953 )     (82,838 )
    


 


Net deferred tax assets

     —         —    
    


 


Deferred tax liabilities:

                

Total deferred tax liabilities

     —         —    
    


 


 

The net change in the total valuation allowance for fiscal years 2003, 2002 and 2001 was an increase of approximately $2.1 million, $5.0 million and $25.0 million, respectively. Subsequently recognized tax benefits relating to the valuation allowance for deferred tax assets at September 30, 2003 will be allocated to income tax benefit and additional paid in capital in the amounts of $83.4 million and $1.6 million respectively.

 

The Company’s management believes the uncertainty regarding the timing of the realization of net deferred tax assets requires a full valuation allowance.

 

At September 30, 2003, the Company has net operating loss carry forwards of approximately $125 million which expire in fiscal years 2012 through 2023, and research credit carry forwards of approximately $7.5 million, which primarily expire in fiscal years 2004 through 2020. Additionally, the Company has other tax credits of approximately $0.4 million that have no expiration date., The extent to which the loss and credit carry forwards can be used to reduce future income taxes may be limited or eliminated, depending on the extent of ownership changes within any three-year period.

 

47


Table of Contents

TARANTELLA, INC.

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

At September 30, 2003, the cumulative un-remitted foreign earnings of the Company were not material. The Company intends to reinvest these earnings indefinitely.

 

Note 13—Transactions with Caldera

 

On May 4, 2001, the Company consummated the sale of its Server Software and Professional Services divisions to Caldera Systems, Inc. Under the terms of the transaction, Caldera Systems, Inc. acquired the assets of the Server and Professional Services groups. A new company, Caldera International, Inc. (“Caldera International”), was formed which combined the assets acquired from the Company with the assets of Caldera Systems, Inc. Upon the completion of the sale, the Company continued to operate its Tarantella business, and accordingly, changed its corporate name to Tarantella, Inc. and its trading symbol to TTLA to reflect the new corporate name. Since the Company has subsequently been de-listed from Nasdaq (see Note 23), the trading symbol has changed to TTLA.PK.

 

As consideration for the transaction, the Company received 16 million common stock shares of Caldera International (representing approximately 28.2% of Caldera International), $23 million in cash (of which $7 million was received on January 26, 2001) and a non-interest bearing promissory note in the amount of $8 million that was originally to be received in quarterly installments of $2 million beginning in August 2002.

 

As part of the original transaction, if the OpenServer line of business of the Server and Professional Services groups generated revenues in excess of specified thresholds during the three-year period following the completion of the combination, the Company had earn-out rights entitling it to receive 45% of these excess revenues. The transaction was treated as a disposal of Server and Professional Services groups and a gain of $53,267,000 was recorded upon completion of the transaction.

 

For the fourth fiscal quarter of 2001, the Company’s operating results included 28.2% of the operating results of Caldera International, adjusted for amortization of 5 months of negative goodwill of approximately $0.7 million. The net amount of the losses included was $4.6 million. In the fourth fiscal quarter of 2001, the Company also recorded an impairment of the investment, net of the remaining negative goodwill of $7.8 million, in the amount of $22.5 million. The impairment was recorded as the share price of Caldera International was significantly below the fair market value of Tarantella’s and was deemed to be other than temporarily impaired.

 

During the first fiscal quarter of 2002, the Company’s net loss included equity losses of $4.0 million for its share of Caldera International losses. After recording this loss, the carrying value of the shares of Caldera International stock was reduced to zero, in accordance with APB opinion No. 18, “The Equity Method of Accounting for Investments in Common Stock.”

 

During the second quarter of fiscal 2002, the Company signed an agreement with Caldera International to redeem the $8 million note receivable held by the Company for $5 million. The note was originally payable in four quarterly installments of $2 million each, beginning in August 2002. A loss of $3,038,000 was recorded against the gain on the sale of divisions to Caldera for the redemption of the note receivable.

 

Additionally, Caldera International agreed to the buyout of certain licenses for products bundled in older releases of The Santa Cruz Operation, Inc.’s software, and the buyback of 500,000 post split shares of Caldera International stock held by the Company for $555,000. On March 7, 2002, Caldera International executed a 1 for 4 reverse stock split. Accordingly, the shares held by the Company were adjusted to reflect the stock split.

 

During the third quarter of fiscal 2002, Tarantella announced an agreement with Caldera International for Caldera International to repurchase the remaining 3,289,401 shares of Caldera International common stock held by Tarantella. Tarantella recorded other income of $3,059,250 from this transaction in the third fiscal quarter and

 

48


Table of Contents

TARANTELLA, INC.

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

subsequently received the cash in July 2002. For the fiscal year ended September 30, 2002, the Company sold 4,010,417 post split shares of Caldera International stock for total proceeds of $4,360,938. As of September 30, 2002, the Company did not own any securities in Caldera International. During the third quarter of fiscal 2002, Caldera International also bought out the remaining term of the OpenServer revenue sharing plan that was part of the original transaction, for $100,000, which was recorded as a gain on the sale of divisions to Caldera. In addition, royalty reserves of $345,000 related to the original transaction were written off and recorded as a gain on the sale of divisions to Caldera.

 

As part of the agreement between the Company and Caldera International, various building leases were assigned to Caldera International, however, the Company was a guarantor under such leases which expire in 2005. In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2002 the Company was released from its obligation as guarantor. There were also building leases, related to the agreement between the Company and Caldera International, that were assigned to the Company, for which Caldera International was a guarantor, and for which the Company had $0.5 million of restricted cash in escrow. During the third quarter of fiscal 2003 Caldera International was released from its obligation as guarantor and the $0.5 million restricted cash that was in escrow was returned to the Company.

 

Note 14 —Reverse Stock Split

 

On November 14, 2002, the Board of Directors unanimously adopted resolutions approving and recommending to the shareholders for their approval a series of amendments to the Company’s Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation to effect a reverse stock split of the Company’s Common Stock at a ratio to be determined by the Company’s Board of Directors. On February 27, 2003, the stockholders approved amendments to the Company’s Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation to effect a reverse stock split. On May 19, 2003, the Board of Directors unanimously approved the implementation of a reverse split with a ratio of one for five. On June 6, 2003, the Company implemented a one-for-five reverse split and the Company’s outstanding common shares were reduced from 49.7 million shares to approximately 9.9 million shares. The reverse stock split has been retroactively reflected in the accompanying consolidated financial statements and notes thereto for all periods presented.

 

Note 15—Business Combinations

 

Acquisition of New Moon Systems, Inc.

 

On June 5, 2003, Tarantella, completed the acquisition of New Moon Systems, Inc., a privately-held California corporation (“New Moon “) pursuant to an Agreement and Plan of Reorganization (the “Agreement”), dated May 29, 2003. New Moon, headquartered in San Jose, CA, develops software to simply and cost-effectively manage and deploy Windows-based applications to end-user desktops in small and medium-sized businesses, as well as enterprise departmental customers. New Moon Canaveral iQ from Tarantella® (“Canaveral iQ”) extends the capabilities of Microsoft’s Windows Terminal Services and answers the demand for a simple and intelligent means of centrally managing remote applications.

 

Pursuant to the Agreement, Tarantella issued a total of 1,592,000 shares of Tarantella common stock valued at $3.6 million in exchange for all of the outstanding shares of New Moon and to satisfy its obligations to the former employees of New Moon. The fair value of the Company’s common stock was determined based on the average closing price per share of the Company’s common stock over the five day period including the two days before and after the terms of the acquisition were agreed to and announced. The New Moon shareholders shall also receive a minimum cash earnout of approximately $1.7 million over a period from January 1, 2004 to December 31, 2006 based on a royalty of 30% of New Moon product revenues, net of direct costs. After the shareholders have been paid the minimum earnout, they would be entitled to an additional royalty of 15% of New Moon product revenues, net of direct costs, during this period. In the event the minimum earnout is not achieved

 

49


Table of Contents

TARANTELLA, INC.

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

by the conclusion of the quarter ending December 31, 2006, Tarantella shall pay along with the final earnout payment an amount equal to the minimum earnout less all aggregate earnouts paid to date, less any off-sets and any escrow claim deficiencies. The Company also incurred approximately $0.3 million of direct merger costs, for a total purchase price of approximately $5.7 million.

 

The results of operations of New Moon subsequent to June 5, 2003, have been included in the Company’s consolidated financial statements for the year ended September 30, 2003.

 

The pro forma financial information reflects a total purchase price for New Moon of $5.7 million as follows (in thousands):

 

Purchase price:

      

Fair Value of Tarantella common stock issued

   $ 3,614

Minimum cash earnout

     1,725

Acquisition costs

     327
    

Total consideration

   $ 5,666
    

 

Under the purchase method of accounting, the estimated total price is allocated to New Moon’s net tangible and intangible assets based upon their estimated fair market value as of the date of acquisition, June 5, 2003. The allocation of the purchase price to goodwill and intangibles is based upon an independent, third-party appraisal and management’s estimates as follows (in thousands):

 

Allocation of purchase price

 

Net tangible assets acquired

      

Assets

      

Cash and cash equivalents

   $ 3,323

Trade receivables, net

     110

Prepaids and other current assets

     91

Property and equipment, net

     145
    

Total assets

     3,669
    

Liabilities

      

Trade payables

     435

Accrued expenses and other current liabilities

     1,008

Deferred revenues

     112

Capital lease obligation, current portion

     259
    

Total liabilities

     1,814
    

Net tangible assets acquired

     1,855
    

Intangible assets acquired

      

Developed technology

     500

Patents/core technology

     700

Customer base

     20

Trade name/Trademark

     200
    

Total intangible assets acquired

     1,420
    

Goodwill

     2,391
    

Total purchase price

   $ 5,666
    

 

50


Table of Contents

TARANTELLA, INC.

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

Net tangible assets acquired as of June 5, 2003 of approximately $1.9 million represent the net tangible assets of New Moon. A portion of the purchase price has been allocated to identifiable intangible assets. The income approach, which includes an analysis of cash flows and risks associated with achieving such cash flows, was used to estimate the fair value of the Company’s existing technology and subscription/maintenance agreements. The royalty savings approach, which estimates the value of an asset by capitalizing the royalties saved because the Company owns the asset, was used to estimate the fair value of the Company’s patents/core technology and trade name/trademarks. The cost approach, which uses the concept of replacement cost as an indicator of fair value, was used to estimate the fair value of the Company’s value-added reseller (“VAR”) relationships. The Company is amortizing all identifiable intangible assets on a straight-line basis over an estimated useful life of three years.

 

The residual purchase price of $2.4 million was recorded as goodwill. Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of the net tangible and intangible assets acquired. In accordance with SFAS No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets”, goodwill relating to the New Moon acquisition is not being amortized and will be carried at cost and tested for impairment annually and whenever events indicate that an impairment may have occurred. As of September 30, 2003, the Company has incurred acquisition costs of $327,000.

 

New Moon had approximately 27 employees at the date of the acquisition. Prior to June 6, 2003, and in connection with the merger, the Company gave redundancy notices to 15 former New Moon employees, and accrued $0.3 million related to their severance benefits. The estimated cost of terminating the employees was accounted for as part of the purchase price. Of the total number of employees to be terminated, 7 were in research and development, 3 were in sales and marketing and 5 in general and administration. During the quarter ended June 30, 2003, 8 of the redundant employees left the Company and the remainder left at various dates through September 30, 2003. During the quarter ended June 30, 2003, $0.1 million was paid out as termination benefits and the remaining $0.2 million was paid out during the quarter ended September 30, 2003.

 

The following unaudited pro forma information shows the results of operations for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2003 and 2002, as if the New Moon acquisition had occurred at the beginning of the periods presented and at the purchase price established at the time of the acquisition (in thousands, except per share amounts):

 

UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED COMBINED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS

(In thousands, except per share data)

 

    

Fiscal Year Ended
September 30,


 
     2003

    2002

 
     (Unaudited)  

Net revenues

   $ 14,287     $ 14,620  

Net loss

   $ (16,250 )   $ (25,906 )

Loss per share

   $ (1.56 )   $ (2.67 )

 

The pro forma information is presented for illustrative purposes only and is not necessarily indicative of the operating results that would have occurred if the acquisition had been consummated at the beginning of the earliest period presented, nor is it necessarily indicative of future operating results.

 

51


Table of Contents

TARANTELLA, INC.

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

Note 16—Acquired Intangible Assets, Net

 

    September 30, 2003

    Gross Carrying
Amount


  Estimated
Useful
Lives


  Accumulated
Amortization


  Intangible
Assets, Net


    (In thousands)   (In years)        

Amortized intangible assets

                     

Technology

  $ 500   3   $ 56   $ 444

Patents

    700   3     78     622

Trademarks

    200   3     22     178

Other

    20   3     2     18
   

     

 

Total

  $ 1,420       $ 158   $ 1,262
   

     

 

Aggregate amortization expense:

                     

For year ended September 30, 2003

  $ 158                

Estimated amortization expense:

                     

For year ending September 30, 2004

    473                

For year ending September 30, 2005

    473                

For year ending September 30, 2006

    316                
   

               
    $ 1,262                
   

               

 

Note 17—Indemnification and Warranties

 

Indemnification.    The Company licenses its software and services pursuant to a software license agreement, in which the Company agrees to indemnify, hold harmless and defend the customer against damages arising out of claims filed by third parties that the Company’s products infringe any copyright or other intellectual property right. The term of the indemnification is generally perpetual, limited by applicable statutes of limitations. The license agreement generally limits the scope of the remedies for such indemnification obligation, including but not limited to certain product usage limitations and the right to replace an infringing product or modify it to make it non-infringing. If the Company cannot address the infringement by replacing or repairing the product, the Company is allowed to cancel the license and return the fees paid by the customer. The Company has never incurred expense under such indemnification provisions. The Company believes the estimated fair value of these indemnification agreements is minimal.

 

As permitted under California law, the Company has agreements whereby it indemnifies its officers and directors for certain events while the officer or director is, or was serving at the Company’s request in such capacity. The maximum potential amount of future payments the Company could be required to make under these indemnification agreements is unlimited; however, the Company has a Director’s and Officer’s insurance policy that limits the Company’s exposure and enables it to recover at least a portion of any future amounts paid. As a result of its insurance policy coverage, the Company believes the estimated fair value of these indemnification agreements is minimal.

 

Warranties.    The Company generally warrants for a period of 90 days that its software products will perform substantially in accordance with its published specifications, that the reproduction of the software on the media material provided by the Company is correct and that the documentation is correctly printed. In the event of any non-conformance, the Company agrees to repair, replace or accept return of the non-conforming product

 

52


Table of Contents

TARANTELLA, INC.

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

and refund any fees paid by the customer for said non-conforming product. The Company has never incurred significant expense under its product warranties. The Company believes the estimated fair value of these warranty agreements is immaterial.

 

As discussed in Note 13, as part of the agreement between the Company and Caldera International, various building leases were assigned to Caldera International. However, the Company was a guarantor under such leases which expire in 2005. In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2002 the Company was released from its obligation as guarantor. There were also building leases, related to the agreement between the Company and Caldera International, that were assigned to the Company, for which Caldera International was a guarantor, and for which the Company had $0.5 million of restricted cash in escrow. During the third quarter of fiscal 2003 Caldera International was released from its obligation as guarantor and the $0.5 million restricted cash that was in escrow was returned to the Company.

 

Note 18—Accrued Restructuring Charge

 

Fiscal 2004

 

In the first quarter of fiscal 2004, the Company implemented a restructuring which reduced the existing workforce by two employees. The Company expects to record a charge of $0.3 million for this restructuring in the first quarter of fiscal 2004.

 

Fiscal 2003

 

On July 24, 2003, the Company announced a restructuring plan, which resulted in a charge of $0.4 million. The Company reduced its spending levels to align its operating expenses with the Company’s lower than expected revenues. The restructuring included a reduction in staffing of 23 employees, and the disposal of fixed assets.

 

The expense included a severance charge of $0.4 million for the elimination of 12 positions in the United States and 11 positions in the United Kingdom. The reductions in force affected the product development, support, sales, marketing and general and administrative functions of the Company. There was also a charge of $6,508 for the disposal of fixed assets. As of September 30, 2003, 22 positions had been eliminated. The remaining 1 employee will be terminated during the 2nd quarter of fiscal 2004.

 

Fiscal 2003 Fourth Quarter Restructuring Accrual

 

     Reduction in
Force


    Disposal of
Fixed Assets


    Total

 
     (In thousands)  

Restructuring charge accrued

   $ 442     $ 6     $ 448  

Payments/utilization of the accrual

     (393 )     (6 )     (399 )
    


 


 


Accrual at September 30, 2003

     49       —         49  
    


 


 


 

On June 5, 2003, the Company announced a restructuring plan, which resulted in a charge of $0.2 million. Also, on June 5, 2003 the Company acquired New Moon. In order to keep spending levels flat with pre-acquisition levels, the Company assessed the overall resource requirements for the combined business and reduced infrastructure accordingly.

 

53


Table of Contents

TARANTELLA, INC.

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

The entire restructuring charge of $0.2 million was for severance, related to the elimination of 12 positions. The positions eliminated were 9 in the US, 2 in the UK and 1 in Germany. The reductions in work force affected the product development, sales, marketing and general and administrative functions of the Company. As of September 30, 2003, all 12 employees were terminated.

 

Fiscal 2003 Third Quarter Restructuring Accrual

 

    

Reduction

in Force


    Total

 
     (In thousands)  

Restructuring charge accrued

   $ 153     $ 153  

Payments/utilization of the accrual

     (57 )     (57 )
    


 


Accrual at June 30, 2003

     96       96  

Payments/utilization of the accrual

     (95 )     (95 )

Provision Adjustment

     (1 )     (1 )
    


 


Accrual at September 30, 2003

   $  —       $  —    
    


 


 

During the first quarter of fiscal 2003, the Company announced a restructuring plan, which resulted in a charge of $1.1 million. The Company reduced its spending levels to align its operating expenses with the Company’s continued lower than expected revenues.

 

A severance charge of $0.8 million included the elimination of 10 positions in the United States, 13 positions in the United Kingdom, and 2 positions in Italy. The reductions in work force affected the product development, sales, marketing and general and administrative functions of the Company. As of December 31, 2002, all 25 positions had been eliminated.

 

A facilities charge of $0.3 million was related to space the Company vacated at two locations in the U.K. This included a non-cash charge of $89,000 related to the write-off of leasehold improvements at the two vacated facilities.

 

The Company completed all of the cost reduction actions initiated in the first quarter of fiscal year 2003 during the fiscal year. Liabilities remain for lease obligation on the two facilities in the U.K.

 

Fiscal 2003 First Quarter Restructuring Accrual

 

    

Reduction

in Force


    Facilities

    Disposal of
Fixed Assets


    Total

 
     (In thousands)  

Restructuring charge accrued

   $ 820     $ 238     $ 89     $ 1,147  

Payments/utilization of the accrual

     (408 )     (24 )     (89 )     (521 )
    


 


 


 


Accrual at December 31, 2002

     412       214       —         626  

Payments/utilization of the accrual

     (240 )     (74 )     —         (314 )
    


 


 


 


Accrual at March 31, 2003

     172       140       —         312  

Payments/utilization of the accrual

     (113 )     (33 )     —         (146 )

Provision Adjustment

     (59 )     —         —         (59 )
    


 


 


 


Accrual at June 30, 2003

     —         107       —         107  

Payments/utilization of the accrual

     —         (34 )     —         (34 )
    


 


 


 


Accrual at September 30, 2003

   $ —       $ 73     $ —       $ 73  
    


 


 


 


 

54


Table of Contents

TARANTELLA, INC.

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

Fiscal 2002

 

During the first quarter of fiscal 2002, the Company announced a restructuring plan, which resulted in a charge of $1.6 million. The Company reduced its spending levels to align its operating expenses with the Company’s lower than expected revenues. The restructuring included a reduction in staffing of 52 employees, a reserve for unused facilities at the Company’s corporate headquarters, and costs associated with closing several foreign offices.

 

This included a severance charge of $0.9 million for the elimination of 19 positions in the United States, 23 positions in the United Kingdom, and 10 positions in Japan. The reductions in force affected the product development, support, sales, marketing and general and administrative functions of the Company. As of March 31, 2002, all 52 positions had been eliminated.

 

Also included was a facilities charge of $0.7 million related to space the Company vacated. The Company had anticipated that it would sub-lease the space by December 31, 2002. As of September 30, 2003, the Company had not secured a sub-lease tenant, so provision adjustments of $0.5 million and $0.6 million were made at the end of fiscal 2003 and fiscal 2002, respectively. The space is now reserved through September 2004. The Company believes it will be able to sub-lease by that date. The lease for this building expires on June 30, 2005. In addition, a charge was taken for expenses associated with office closures in Japan and Brazil. There was a non-cash charge of $39,000 related to fixed asset disposals at the Japan subsidiary.

 

The Company completed the cost reduction actions initiated in fiscal 2002, with the exception of sub-leasing excess space at the Company’s corporate headquarters in Santa Cruz, California.

 

Fiscal 2002 First Quarter Restructuring Accrual

 

    

Reduction

in Force


    Facilities

    Disposal of
Fixed Assets


    Total

 
     (In thousands)  

Restructuring charge accrued

   $ 856     $ 736     $ 44     $ 1,636  

Payments/utilization of the accrual

     (772 )     (31 )     —         (803 )
    


 


 


 


Accrual at December 31, 2001

     84       705       44       833  

Payments/utilization of the accrual

     (89 )     (211 )     (39 )     (339 )

Provision Adjustment

     5       —         (5 )     —    
    


 


 


 


Accrual at March 31, 2002

     —         494       —         494  

Payments/utilization of the accrual

     —         (156 )     —         (156 )
    


 


 


 


Accrual at June 30, 2002

     —         338       —         338  

Payments/utilization of the accrual

     —         (148 )     —         (148 )

Provision Adjustment

     —         560       —         560  
    


 


 


 


Accrual at September 30, 2002

     —         750       —         750  

Payments/utilization of the accrual

     —         (157 )     —         (157 )
    


 


 


 


Accrual at December 31, 2002

     —         593       —         593  

Payments/utilization of the accrual

     —         (140 )     —         (140 )
    


 


 


 


Accrual at March 31, 2003

     —         453       —         453  

Payments/utilization of the accrual

     —         (158 )     —         (158 )
    


 


 


 


Accrual at June 30, 2003

     —         295       —         295  

Payments/utilization of the accrual

     —         (135 )     —         (135 )

Provision Adjustment

     —         485       —         485  
    


 


 


 


Accrual at September 30, 2003

   $ —       $ 645     $  —        $ 645  
    


 


 


 


 

55


Table of Contents

TARANTELLA, INC.

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

Fiscal 2001

 

During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2001, the Company announced a restructuring plan, which resulted in a charge of $0.5 million. The restructuring charge included a reduction in personnel of 10 employees and a planned elimination of offices in Singapore and Australia. Total cash expenditures were $0.4 million.

 

The severance charge of $0.4 million included the elimination of 4 positions in the United States and 6 positions in the United Kingdom. The reductions in work force affected the sales, marketing and general and administrative functions of the Company. At September 30, 2001, all 10 positions had been eliminated. A provision adjustment of $64,000 was made to release excess restructuring reserve, which resulted from the fact that the Company had not anticipated that the Australian office would be sub-leased. The provision adjustment of $8,453 in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2003 was for the final costs associated with closing the Australian office.

 

Fiscal 2001 Fourth Quarter Restructuring Accrual

 

     Reduction
in Force


    Facilities

    Total

 
     (In thousands)  

Restructuring charge accrued

   $ 402     $ 102     $ 504  

Payments/utilization of the accrual

     (200 )     —         (200 )
    


 


 


Accrual at September 30, 2001

     202       102       304  

Payments/utilization of the accrual

     (202 )     (3 )     (205 )
    


 


 


Accrual at December 31, 2001

     —         99       99  

Payments/utilization of the accrual

     —         (6 )     (6 )
    


 


 


Accrual at March 31, 2002

     —         93       93  

Payments/utilization of the accrual

     —         —         —    
    


 


 


Accrual at June 30, 2002

     —         93       93  

Payments/utilization of the accrual

     —         (14 )     (14 )

Provision Adjustment

     —         (64 )     (64 )
    


 


 


Accrual at September 30, 2002

     —         15       15  

Payments/utilization of the accrual

     —         (1 )     (1 )
    


 


 


Accrual at December 31, 2002

     —         14       14  

Payments/utilization of the accrual

     —         (9 )     (9 )
    


 


 


Accrual at March 31, 2003

   $ —       $ 5     $ 5  

Payments/utilization of the accrual

     —         (3 )     (3 )
    


 


 


Accrual at June 30, 2003

   $ —       $ 2     $ 2  

Payments/utilization of the accrual

     —         (10 )     (10 )

Provision Adjustment

     —         8       8  
    


 


 


Accrual at September 30, 2003

   $ —       $  —       $ —    
    


 


 


 

56


Table of Contents

TARANTELLA, INC.

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

During the second quarter of fiscal 2001, the Company announced a restructuring plan which resulted in a charge of $1.6 million, which when taken with a provision adjustment to a previously established restructuring reserve for severance related to the sale of divisions to Caldera, resulted in net charge for the period of $1.1 million. The restructuring charge included a reduction in personnel of 28 employees and a reserve for unused facilities. Total cash expenditures were $1.6 million (see table below).

 

The $1.6 million restructuring charge included a severance charge of $1.5 million for the elimination of 16 positions in the United States, 4 positions in the United Kingdom, and 8 positions in various other geographies. The reduction in work force affected the sales, marketing and general and administrative functions of the Company. As of September 30, 2001, all 28 positions had been eliminated. The Company vacated additional space within its Santa Cruz, California office in the first quarter of fiscal 2002, and an additional charge of $81,000 was recorded for estimated payments on the lease for an additional 12 months. In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2002, an additional charge of $85,000 was recorded and in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2003, an additional charge of $64,000 was recorded because the facility was not yet sub-leased. The facility was not sub-leased as of September 30, 2003 and the restructuring reserve at the end of the fourth quarter of fiscal 2003 covers rents through September 30, 2004. The Company believes it will be able to sub-lease the space by that date. The lease for this building expires on June 30, 2005.

 

Fiscal 2001 Second Quarter Restructuring Accrual

 

     Reduction
in Force


    Facilities

    Total

 
     (In thousands)  

Restructuring charge accrued

   $ 1,499     $ 64     $ 1,563  

Payments/utilization of the accrual

     (885 )     —         (885 )
    


 


 


Accrual at March 31, 2001

     614       64       678  

Payments/utilization of the accrual

     (484 )     —         (484 )
    


 


 


Accrual at June 30, 2001

     130       64       194  

Payments/utilization of the accrual

     (91 )     (24 )     (115 )

Provision Adjustment

     (39 )     —         (39 )
    


 


 


Accrual at September 30, 2001

     —         40       40  

Payments/utilization of the accrual

     —         (40 )     (40 )

Provision Adjustment

     —         81       81  
    


 


 


Accrual at December 31, 2001

     —         81       81  

Payments/utilization of the accrual

     —         (20 )     (20 )
    


 


 


Accrual at March 31, 2002

     —         61       61  

Payments/utilization of the accrual

     —         (20 )     (20 )
    


 


 


Accrual at June 30, 2002

     —         41       41  

Payments/utilization of the accrual

     —         (20 )     (20 )

Provision Adjustment

             85       85  
    


 


 


Accrual at September 30, 2002

     —         106       106  

Payments/utilization of the accrual

     —         (22 )     (22 )
    


 


 


Accrual at December 31, 2002

     —         84       84  

Payments/utilization of the accrual

     —         (20 )     (20 )
    


 


 


Accrual at March 31, 2003

     —         64       64  

Payments/utilization of the accrual

     —         (22 )     (22 )
    


 


 


Accrual at June 30, 2003

     —         42       42  

Payments/utilization of the accrual

     —         (19 )     (19 )

Provision Adjustment

     —         64       64  
    


 


 


Accrual at September 30, 2003

   $ —       $ 87     $ 87  
    


 


 


 

57


Table of Contents

TARANTELLA, INC.

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

Note 19—Industry and Geographic Segment Information

 

Beginning on May 4, 2001, with the sale of the Server Software and Professional Services divisions, the Company discontinued managing the business by division or geographic segment. Prior to May 4, 2001, the Company reviewed performance on the basis of its three divisions—the Server Software Division, the Tarantella Division, and the Professional Services Division. Accordingly, the Company now operates in one reportable segment, Tarantella.

 

For the fiscal year ended September 30, 2003, one customer accounted for 13.72% of revenue. For the fiscal year ended September 30, 2002, one customer accounted for 10.3% of the Company’s net revenues. For the fiscal years ended September 30, 2001, no single customer accounted for more than 10% of the Company’s net revenues.

 

The following table presents information on revenue and long-lived assets by geography. Revenue is allocated based on the location from which the sale is satisfied and long-lived asset information is based on the physical location of the asset.

 

The significant reduction of revenues and long-lived assets from fiscal 2001 is due to the sale of the Server and Professional Services divisions to Caldera International in May 2001.

 

     Fiscal Year Ended September 30,

     2003

   2002

   2001

     (In thousands)

Net revenues:

                    

United States

   $ 6,544    $ 8,011    $ 31,920

Canada and Latin America

     821      769      4,034

EMEIA (1)

     5,012      4,044      24,930

Asia Pacific

     1,629      1,396      5,778
    

  

  

Total net revenues

   $ 14,006    $ 14,220    $ 66,662
    

  

  

Long-lived assets:

                    

United States

   $ 4,381    $ 1,810       

EMEIA (1)

     349      471       
    

  

      

Total long-lived assets

   $ 4,730    $ 2,281       
    

  

      

(1)   Europe, Middle East, India and Africa

 

Note 20—Employee Benefit Plan

 

The Company maintains an employee savings plan, which qualifies under section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code. Under the plan, participating U.S. employees may defer up to 50% of their pre-tax salary, up to certain statutory limits. Until December 31, 2002, the Company matched 50% of employee contributions up to the lower of 6% of the employee’s annual salary or $3,000. As of December 31, 2002, the Company no longer makes any contribution. For fiscal 2003, 2002, and 2001, the Company’s total contributions towards the 401(k) plan amounted to $14,000, $0.1 million and $0.6 million, respectively.

 

During fiscal 2003, there was a partial plan termination of the Company’s 401 (k) plan, which was triggered by the Company’s planned reductions in force. As a result, the participants that were terminated became fully vested, regardless of years of service. This did not result in any additional contribution from the Company. The eight employees that were impacted received additional funds from the plan of approximately $13,000.

 

58


Table of Contents

TARANTELLA, INC.

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

Note 21—Quarterly Reporting (unaudited)

 

The following tables present Tarantella’s condensed operating results for each of the eight fiscal quarters in the period ended September 30, 2003. The information for each of these quarters is unaudited and has been prepared on the same basis as the audited consolidated financial statements included in this Form 10-K. In the opinion of management, all necessary adjustments, which consist only of normal and recurring accruals, have been included to fairly present the unaudited quarterly results. In addition, the information includes the effect of the restatement described in Note 2. This data should be read together with Tarantella’s consolidated financial statements and the notes to those statements included in this Form 10-K.

 

QUARTERLY RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

(Unaudited)

 

    Fiscal Year Ended September 30, 2003

 
    Q4     Q3     Q2     Q2     Q1     Q1  
   
   
    (As previously
reported)


    (As restated,
see note 2)


    (As previously
reported)


    (As restated,
see note 2)


 
    (In thousands, except per share data)  

Net revenues

  $ 3,079     $ 3,752     $ 4,404     $ 4,230     $ 3,585     $ 2,945  

Cost of revenues

    577       291       376       373       327       314  
   


 


 


 


 


 


Gross margin

    2,502       3,461       4,028       3,857       3,258       2,631  

Operating expenses

    6,800       4,471       4,717       4,646       5,849       5,795  
   


 


 


 


 


 


Operating loss

    (4,298 )     (1,010 )     (689 )     (789 )     (2,591 )     (3,164 )

Other income (expense):

                                               

Gain (loss) on sale of divisions to Caldera

    —         —         —         —         —         —    

Gain on sale of Caldera common stock

    —         —         —         —         —         —    

Loss and impairment of equity investment in Caldera

    —         —         —         —         —         —    

Interest income/(expense), net

    (4 )     4       14       14       32       32  

Other income (expense), net

    (100 )     (118 )     63       63       (14 )     (14 )
   


 


 


 


 


 


Income (loss) before income taxes

    (4,402 )     (1,124 )     (612 )     (712 )     (2,573 )     (3,146 )

Income tax expense/(benefit)

    20       122       98       98       60       60  
   


 


 


 


 


 


Net income (loss)

  $ (4,422 )   $ (1,246 )   $ (710 )   $ (810 )   $ (2,633 )   $ (3,206 )
   


 


 


 


 


 


Comprehensive income (loss)

  $ (4,169 )   $ (1,147 )   $ (905 )   $ (1,005 )   $ (2,354 )   $ (2,927 )
   


 


 


 


 


 


Earnings (loss) per share-basic

  $ (0.44 )   $ (0.14 )   $ (0.09 )   $ (0.10 )   $ (0.32 )   $ (0.39 )

Earnings (loss) per share-diluted

  $ (0.44 )   $ (0.14 )   $ (0.09 )   $ (0.10 )   $ (0.32 )   $ (0.39 )
   


 


 


 


 


 


Shares used in per share calculation—basic

    10,014       8,764       8,240       8,240       8,206       8,206  
   


 


 


 


 


 


 

59


Table of Contents

TARANTELLA, INC.

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

QUARTERLY RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

(Unaudited)

 

     Fiscal Year Ended September 30, 2002

 
     Q4     Q4     Q3     Q2     Q1  
     (As previously
reported)


    (As restated,
see note 2)


   
   
   
 
     (In thousands, except per share data)  

Net revenues

   $ 3,902     $ 3,406     $ 3,650     $ 4,339     $ 2,825  

Cost of revenues

     286       276       487       418       318  
    


 


 


 


 


Gross margin

     3,616       3,130       3,163       3,921       2,507  

Operating expenses

     5,759       5,678       5,964       6,005       9,857  
    


 


 


 


 


Operating loss

     (2,143 )     (2,548 )     (2,801 )     (2,084 )     (7,350 )

Other income (expense):

                                        

Gain (loss) on sale of divisions to Caldera

     150       150       445       (3,038 )     —    

Gain on sale of Caldera common stock

     —         —         3,141       1,083       267  

Loss and impairment of equity investment in Caldera

     —         —         —         —         (4,010 )

Interest income/(expense), net

     41       41       36       208       233  

Other income (expense), net

     (146 )     (146 )     444       (538 )     (800 )
    


 


 


 


 


Income (loss) before income taxes

     (2,098 )     (2,503 )     1,265       (4,369 )     (11,660 )

Income tax expense/(benefit)

     (316 )     (316 )     0       (760 )     0  
    


 


 


 


 


Net income (loss)

   $ (1,782 )   $ (2,187 )   $ 1,265     $ (3,609 )   $ (11,660 )
    


 


 


 


 


Comprehensive income (loss)

   $ (1,593 )   $ (1,997 )   $ 1,278     $ (3,527 )   $ (11,661 )
    


 


 


 


 


Earnings (loss) per share-basic

   $ (0.22 )   $ (0.27 )   $ 0.16     $ (0.45 )   $ (1.45 )

Earnings (loss) per share-diluted

   $ (0.22 )   $ (0.27 )   $ 0.15     $ (0.45 )   $ (1.45 )
    


 


 


 


 


Shares used in per share calculation—basic

     8,177       8,177       8,114       8,070       8,024  
    


 


 


 


 


 

60


Table of Contents

TARANTELLA, INC.

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

Note 22—Valuation and Qualifying Accounts

 

SCHEDULE II/RULE 5-04

VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS

 

Years Ended September 30, 2003, 2002 and 2001

 

Description


  

Balance

at
Beginning
of Period


   Charged to
Revenues or
Expenses


    Deductions

   

Balance at

End of
Period


     (In thousands)

Year Ended September 30, 2003

                             

Allowance for returns

   $ 111    $ 907     $ 809     $ 209

Allowance for doubtful accounts

     229      (16 )     (110 )     323
    

  


 


 

Total allowance

   $ 340    $ 891     $ 699     $ 532
    

  


 


 

Year Ended September 30, 2002

                             

Allowance for returns

   $ 920    $ 27     $ 836     $ 111

Allowance for doubtful accounts

     1,415      371       1,557       229
    

  


 


 

Total allowance

   $ 2,335    $ 398     $ 2,393     $ 340
    

  


 


 

Year Ended September 30, 2001

                             

Allowance for returns

   $ 2,330    $ 2,408     $ 3,818     $ 920

Allowance for doubtful accounts

     862      950       397       1,415
    

  


 


 

Total allowance

   $ 3,192    $ 3,358     $ 4,215     $ 2,335
    

  


 


 

 

Note 23—Subsequent Events

 

Management Change

 

On December 11, 2003, the Company announced that its Board of Directors had appointed Francis E. Wilde as Chief Executive Officer (CEO), President and a Director of the Company. Mr. Wilde succeeds Douglas Michels, who became a strategic advisor to the Company, focusing initially on merger and acquisition opportunities. Mr. Michels will also continue as a Director of Tarantella.

 

The Board has also approved the request by several senior executives including Messrs. Wilde, Michels and Alok Mohan, the Company’s Chairman, to receive a substantial portion of their calendar year 2004 compensation in the form of restricted stock in lieu of cash.

 

On January 6, 2004, the Company announced the appointment of John M. Greeley as Chief Financial Officer (CFO), reporting directly to Mr. Wilde. Mr. Greeley assumed the CFO responsibilities from Mr. Mohan, who had been serving as acting CFO since September 8, 2003.

 

Private Placement

 

On December 26, 2003, the Company completed a private placement of common stock and warrants to the following investors: Special Situations Technology Funds (who are expanding their previous investment), Starlight Digital Technologies, LLC, an investment group in which Mr. Wilde acts as Managing Director, and an additional private investor, resulting in gross proceeds to the Company of approximately $2,750,000. In connection with the financing, the Company paid fees in the amount of $232,303.

 

61


Table of Contents

TARANTELLA, INC.

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

In the private placement, the investors purchased 2,750,000 shares of Tarantella common stock at a price of $1.00 per share. The investors also acquired warrants to purchase up to an additional 550,000 shares at an exercise price of $1.39 per share. The warrants are exercisable for five years. The Company also has agreed to register the shares of common stock issued to the investors as well as the shares issuable upon exercise of the warrants for resale once the Company has complied with its reporting obligations under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended and is permitted to register its securities under the securities laws.

 

In connection with the investment, the Company also amended its existing shareholder rights plan such that Special Situations shall be permitted to acquire up to 30% beneficial ownership of the outstanding stock of the Company without triggering the Company’s shareholder rights plan, provided that for purposes of determining Special Situations’ beneficial ownership, neither the warrants nor any future exercises of warrants will be considered.

 

On February 23, 2004, the Company announced the completion of a private placement of common stock and warrants to various investors. In the private placement, the investors purchased 11,678,580 shares of Tarantella common stock at a price of $1.40 per share. The investors also acquired warrants to purchase up to an additional 2,335,714 shares at an exercise price of $1.70 per share for gross proceeds of $16,350,000. The warrants are exercisable for five years. If the warrants are fully exercised, the Company would receive additional gross proceeds of approximately $3,970,714. The Company also has agreed to register the shares of common stock issued to the investors as well as the shares issuable upon exercise of the warrants for resale once the Company has complied with its reporting obligations under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. In connection with the financing, the Company will pay fees in the amount of $1,074,000.

 

Restructuring

 

In the first quarter of fiscal 2004, the Company implemented a restructuring which reduced the existing workforce by two employees. The Company expects to record a charge of $0.3 million for this restructuring in the first quarter of fiscal 2004.

 

De-Listing Status (unaudited)

 

On October 20, 2003, the Company announced that it had received notification from the Nasdaq Listing Qualifications Panel that the Company’s stock would discontinue trading on the Nasdaq SmallCap Market effective with the open of business on Tuesday, October 21, 2003.

 

This action followed Tarantella’s appeal to Nasdaq for a listing extension after not meeting the stated time requirements to file SEC Form 10-Q for the Company’s third fiscal quarter. The Nasdaq Panel determination to delist the Company’s stock was based on the Company’s filing delinquency, public interest concerns, and the ongoing nature of the internal revenue investigation. On December 8, 2003, the Company filed an appeal to reverse that portion of the Nasdaq Panel’s decision relating to its public interest concerns. On February 27, 2004, the Nasdaq advised the Company that its appeal had been denied.

 

Tarantella’s common stock is not currently eligible to trade on the OTC Bulletin Board but is eligible for quotation on the OTC Pink Sheets. The Company’s trading symbol has changed to TTLA.PK.

 

Regaining SEC compliance may allow the Company’s shares to be eligible for trading on the OTC Bulletin Board. If the Company resumes compliance with the periodic reporting requirements of the 1934 Exchange Act, it will attempt to meet the listing requirements for the Nasdaq SmallCap Market, however some requirements such as minimum bid price and market capitalization are outside of the Company’s control.

 

62


Table of Contents

 

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS’ REPORT

 

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of

Tarantella, Inc.

Santa Cruz, CA

 

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Tarantella, Inc. and its subsidiaries (the “Company”), as of September 30, 2003 and 2002, and the related consolidated statements of operations, shareholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended September 30, 2003. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

 

We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

 

In our opinion, such consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of the Company as of September 30, 2003 and 2002, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended September 30, 2003 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

 

As discussed in Note 2, the accompanying 2002 consolidated financial statements have been restated.

 

/S/    DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

 

DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

San Jose, California

March 5, 2004

 

63


Table of Contents

Item 9.    Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosures

 

There were no disagreements with the Company’s independent accountants during the fiscal years ended September 30, 2003, 2002 and 2001.

 

Item 9A.    Controls and Procedures

 

(a)   Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures.

 

The events cited in this report that are the subject of the restatement were the result of material weaknesses in the Company’s system of internal controls and operations. The Company has taken and intends to continue to take measures to cure these weaknesses, which include changes in senior management, strengthening the independence of the Board of Directors and tightening internal policies and procedures.

 

The Company has carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of its management, including the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act) as of the end of the period covered by this report. It should be noted that the design of any system of controls is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions, regardless of how remote. Based upon their evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer concluded that disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that material information required to be disclosed in the Company reports that are filed or submitted under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission rules and forms, except as noted below with respect to the restatement.

 

(b)   Changes in internal controls.

 

Due to the matters that caused the restatement of the audited consolidated financial statements and related notes for the three and twelve months ended September 30, 2002 and the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and related notes for the three months ended December 31, 2002 and three and six months ended March 31, 2003, the Company has taken a number of steps to improve the effectiveness of internal controls, including the following:

 

The Company now requires extensive sales certifications from all sales representatives and systems engineers to be provided to the Company’s finance department.

 

The Company requires proof of an end user purchase order when fulfilling transactions over $25,000.

 

The Company now requires all distributors to submit sales out reports and inventory reports prior to the closing of a financial period.

 

The Company drafted a revenue recognition handbook and distributed it to all sales personnel. Each person in sales has certified they have read and understand the handbook.

 

We believe that these efforts have addressed the material weaknesses and significant deficiencies that affected our internal controls in 2002 and 2003. The Company continues to improve and refine its internal controls. This process is ongoing, and the Company seeks to foster an exemplary internal control environment.

 

Other than as summarized above, there has been no change in the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting that occured during the most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected or is reasonably likely to materially affect the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting. The Company will continue to assess disclosure controls and procedures and will take any further actions that are deemed necessary.

 

64


Table of Contents

PART III

 

Item 10.    Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant

 

As of January 31, 2004, the names of the Company’s directors and executive officers and certain information about them are set forth below:

 

Name


   Age

  

Position with the Company


  

Director

Since


Alok Mohan(1)

   55    Chairman    1994

Douglas L. Michels(3)

   49    Director    1979

Robert M. McClure(2)(3)

   68    Director    1993

Gilbert P. Williamson(1)

   66    Director    1993

R. Duff Thompson(2)

   52    Director    1995

Ronald Lachman(1)

   47    Director    1996

Ninian Eadie(2)

   66    Director    1996

Francis E. Wilde

   53    President, Chief Executive Officer and Director    2003

John M. Greeley

   56    Vice President, Chief Financial Officer    2004

E. Joseph Vitetta Jr.

   46    Vice President, Corporate Development    2003

(1)   Member of the Compensation Committee
(2)   Member of the Audit Committee
(3)   Member of the Stock Option Committee

 

Mr. Mohan has been a director of the Company since 1994 and became Chairman of the Board in April 1998. From May to December of 1994 he served as Senior Vice President, Operations and Chief Financial Officer of the Company. In December 1994 he was elected a director and assumed the position of President and Chief Operating Officer. He served as the Company’s Chief Executive Officer from July 1995 until April 1998. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Mohan was employed with NCR Corporation for over 20 years. At NCR Corporation Mr. Mohan served as Vice President and General Manager of the Workstation Products Division, from January 1990 until July 1993. From July 1993 to May 1994 he served as Vice President of Strategic Planning and Controller, with responsibility for financial planning and analysis as well as worldwide reporting. Mr. Mohan serves as a director on the boards of Rainmaker Systems, Inc. and Crystal Graphics. Mr. Mohan is also a Venture partner with Blue Chip Venture Company.

 

Mr. Michels became a director of the Company in 1979. As a co-founder of the Company, Mr. Michels was the principal architect of the Company’s technology strategy. Mr. Michels served as President and Chief Executive Officer from April 1998 until December 2003. Mr. Michels also served as the Company’s Executive Vice President between January 1979 and April 1998 and was the Company’s Chief Technical Officer between January 1993 and April 1998. Mr. Michels serves as a director of FastNet Corporation and Arete Corporation.

 

Dr. McClure became a director of the Company in May 1993. From 1978 until 2001 he served as President of Unidot, Inc., which he founded to specialize in the design of sophisticated computer software and hardware for equipment manufacturers worldwide. Dr. McClure serves as a director of Arete Corporation.

 

Mr. Williamson became a director of the Company in May 1993. From September 1991 until May 1993, he served as Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of NCR Corporation, and also served as a member of the Board of Directors of AT&T. He retired from NCR and the AT&T board of directors in May 1993. From January 1989 until September 1991, he served as President of NCR and as a director, and prior to that time served as Executive Vice President for marketing at NCR for three years. Mr. Williamson is also a director of Fifth-Third Bank of Western Ohio (formerly Citizens Federal Bank, F.S.B.) headquartered in Dayton, Ohio. He also serves on the Board of Directors of two private companies: Dean Investments and French Oil Mill Machinery.

 

65


Table of Contents

Mr. Thompson was appointed as a director of the Company in December 1995. Mr. Thompson is Managing General Partner of EsNet, Ltd., an investment group that is active in both technology and real estate ventures. From June 1994 to January 1996, he served as Senior Vice President of the Corporate Development Group of Novell, Inc. Prior to that time, he served as Executive Vice President and General Counsel for WordPerfect Corporation, and before joining WordPerfect Corporation in 1986, he was a partner with the Salt Lake City law firm of Callister, Duncan & Nebeker. Mr. Thompson is a former Chairman of the Board of the Business Software Alliance, the principal software industry association dealing with software industry issues, including copyright protection and public policy. He also serves on the Board of The SCO Group, Inc.

 

Mr. Lachman became a director of the Company in February 1996. He is a partner of Lachman Goldman Ventures, a venture capital company that helps co-found and invest in Internet infrastructure technology ventures including Lachman Goldman Ventures, Connected Corporation, UltraDNS, Catbird Networks, DuoDesign, Centergate Research, Whitehat/ACG, Availl, and Crestview Funds. Mr. Lachman has helped co-found or sits on the board of several of these companies. He founded Lachman Associates in January 1975 and served as its President from January 1975 until June 1989. In January of 1993 he founded Lachman Technology, serving as its President from January 1993 until May 1994. Both Lachman companies developed networking software shipped with most UNIX servers. Mr. Lachman served as Executive Vice President of Interactive Systems, a Kodak Company, from June 1989 through the end of 1992.

 

Mr. Eadie became a director of the Company in April 1996. He retired from International Computers Limited (“ICL”) in April 1997. Mr. Eadie served as ICL’s Group Executive Director, Technology, from January 1994 until July 1996, where he was responsible for research, development, manufacturing and third party distribution of all ICL products. Prior to that he served as President of ICL Europe from January 1990 until January 1994 and from May 1988 until January 1990 he served as President, ICL International. Mr. Eadie served on ICL’s Board of Directors from 1984 until 1997, and was a member of ICL’s Executive Management Committee from 1988 until 1997. He was a member of the SCO (UK) Advisory Board from June 1994 until his appointment to the Company’s Board in April 1996.

 

Mr. Wilde was appointed President, Chief Executive Officer and Director of Tarantella, Inc. in December 2003. Mr. Prior to joining Tarantella, Inc. in 2003, Wilde served as Managing Director of Starlight Digital Technologies, LLC, from February 2003 to the present. Mr. Wilde served as Chairman of the Board of Digital Stream USA, Inc. from February 2002 until October 2003. Mr. Wilde served as President and CEO of Ravisent Technologies, Inc. from August 1997 until August 2001. Mr. Wilde was also a Director of Ravisent Technologies, Inc. from August 1997 until January 2002. Mr. Wilde has also held executive management positions at IBM, Dell Computer, Memorex Telex and Academic Systems.

 

Mr. Greeley was appointed Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Tarantella, Inc. in January 2003. Prior to joining Tarantella, Inc. in 2004, Mr. Greeley held the position of CFO at Phoenix Technologies, a public software company, from April 2000 until May 2003. Mr. Greeley was Chief Financial Officer and Chief Operating Officer at Leasing Solutions, Inc. from 1999 until 2000. Mr. Greeley held various senior positions at GE Capital Corporation between 1983 and 1999.

 

Mr. Vitetta was appointed Vice President, Corporate Development and Secretary of Tarantella, Inc. in December 2003. Prior to joining Tarantella, Inc. in 2003, Mr. Vitetta served as Executive Vice President, Corporate Development at Starlight Digital Technologies, LLC from February 2003 until December 2003. Mr Vitetta served as Vice President, Corporate Development at Axeda Systems, Inc. (formerly known as Ravisent Technologies, Inc. and Quadrant International), from September 1998 until February 2003.

 

There is no family relationship between any director or executive officer of the Company.

 

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

 

Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) requires the Company’s executive officers and directors, and persons who own more than ten percent (10%) of a registered class of the

 

66


Table of Contents

Company’s equity securities to file reports of ownership and changes in ownership with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) and the National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc. Executive officers, directors and greater than ten percent stockholders are required by SEC regulation to furnish the Company with copies of all Section 16(a) forms they file. Based solely on its review of the copies of such forms received by the Company, or written representations from certain reporting persons, the Company believes that all Section 16 filing requirements applicable to its officer, directors and ten percent (10%) shareholders during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2003 were fulfilled.

 

Code of Ethics

 

The Company has adopted a Code of Ethics that applies to the Chief Executive Officer, the Chief Financial Officer, Senior Financial Officers and employees with financial reporting responsibilities, a copy of which is filed as Exhibit 14.1 to this Form 10-K.

 

Financial Expert

 

The Board of Directors has determined that no member of the Audit Committee satisfies all of the criteria to be a “financial expert” as defined in Item 401(h) of Regulation S-K. However, each of the members of the Audit Committee is an “independent director” as defined under Rule 10A-3(b) of the Exchange Act. The Company did not have an Audit Committee financial expert during the most recent fiscal year. The Company’s principal focus during that time was on the New Moon acquisition, the internal review and regaining compliance with the Nasdaq Smallcap Market’s minimum bid level requirement and its reporting requirement under the Exchange Act. As a result of those efforts, the Company was unable to allocate the resources necessary to identify an individual with the expertise necessary to serve as a financial expert on the Audit Committee.

 

Item 11.    Executive Compensation

 

SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE

 

The following table sets forth the compensation paid by the Company during the last three fiscal years to (i) the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, and (ii) each of the three other most highly compensated executive officers (Named Executive Officers) of the Company, whose salary plus bonus exceeded $100,000 in fiscal year 2003:

 

          Annual Compensation

   

Long-Term

Compensation


      
            Awards

      

Name and Principal Position


   Year

   Salary($)(1)

   Bonus/
($)(2)


  

Other Annual

Compensation($)


   

Securities
Underlying

Options(#)


  

All Other
Compensation

($)(3)


 

Douglas L. Michels (11)

President, Chief Executive Officer

   2003
2002
2001
   $
 
 
308,011
364,014
345,680
   0
0
111,511
   2,148
2,148
300
(4)
(4)
(5)
  40,001
476,109
150,000
   $
 
 
2,007
3,000
593,967
(7)
 
 

Randall Bresee (8)

Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer

   2003
2002
2001
    
 
 
197,322
233,200
220,931
   17,490
0
70,786
   763
500
1,741
(5)
(5)
(5)
  25,000
292,053
125,000
    
 
 
2,777
0
331,270
(7)
 
 

Steven M. Sabbath (9)

Senior Vice President, Law and Corporate Affairs and Secretary

   2003
2002
2001
    
 
 
228,487
242,477
230,264
   18,213
0
73,813
   473
310
531
(5)
(5)
(5)
  25,001
263,490
75,000
    
 
 
82,762
3,000
347,595
(7)(10)
 
 

Edmundo Costa

Vice President, Sales

   2003      163,497    6,731    37,004 (6)   35,000      935 (3)(7)

(1)   Includes salary earned in the applicable fiscal year but paid or to be paid in the following fiscal year.
(2)   The Company pays bonuses to executive officers as determined by the Board of Directors. The bonuses for each executive officer are based on the officer’s base salary, the Company’s financial performance, and individual performance during the fiscal year. Includes bonuses earned in the applicable fiscal year but paid or to be paid in the following fiscal year.

 

67


Table of Contents
(3)   The dollar amounts in this column include 401(k) contributions for the following persons in the amount of $3,000 for 2002 and 2001 paid by the Company on behalf of Mr. Michels, and Mr. Sabbath and $312 paid by the Company on behalf of Mr. Costa in 2003. In addition, the dollar amounts in this column include “Change in Control” payments made in 2001 in the following amounts: Mr. Michels $590,967; Mr. Bresee $331,270; and Mr. Sabbath $344,595.
(4)   Represents taxable Company paid health insurance benefit.
(5)   Represents tax preparation and estate planning services.
(6)   Represents annual airline club membership fees of $350, commission of $31,254 and car allowance of $5,400.
(7)   Represents Company paid life insurance premium above $50,000. Following are the amounts included; $2,007 for Mr. Michels, $2,777 for Mr. Bresee, $2,997 for Mr. Sabbath and $623 for Mr. Costa.
(8)   Randall Bresee left the Company in April 1999, and prior to his departure he was not an Executive officer. Mr. Bresee was rehired in April 2000, as the Chief Financial Officer. Mr. Bresee left the Company in December 2003.
(9)   Mr. Sabbath left the Company in August 2003, returned to the Company in October 2003, then left in November 2003.
(10)   The amount represents money paid to Mr. Sabbath as severance but later re-classified as a discretionary bonus when Mr. Sabbath returned to work.
(11)   Mr. Michels resigned as CEO in December 2003 but remains a Director.

 

OPTION GRANTS IN FISCAL YEAR 2003

 

The following table sets forth each grant of stock options during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2003 to the Named Executive Officers:

 

     Individual Grants

         
     Number of
Option
Shares
Granted (1)


   Percentage of
Total Option
Shares
Granted to
Employees in
Fiscal Year (2)


    Exercise
Price
Per
Share


  

Expiration

Date


   Potential Realizable
Value of Assumed
Annual Rates of Stock
Price Appreciation for
Option Term (3)


Name


              5%

   10%

Doug Michels

   40,001    4.48 %   $ 0.90    11/14/12    $ 22,640    $ 57,376

Edmundo Costa

   35,000    3.92 %   $ 0.90    11/14/12    $ 19,810    $ 50,203

Steven M. Sabbath

   25,001    2.80 %   $ 0.90    11/14/12    $ 14,151    $ 35,860

Randall Bresee

   25,000    2.80 %   $ 0.90    11/14/12    $ 14,150    $ 35,859

(1)   All options were granted under the 2004 Incentive Stock Option Plan (the “Option Plan”). The option exercise price of all stock options granted under the Option Plan is generally equal to the fair market value of the shares of Common Stock on the day prior to the date of grant. The options have a term of 10 years and generally vest at the rate 25% of the shares subject to the option per year in which the optionee remains in continuous status as an employee or consultant.
(2)   The Company granted options to purchase an aggregate of 900,832 shares to employees in fiscal year 2003.
(3)   Potential realizable values are based on assumed annual rates of return specified by the Securities and Exchange Commission. The Company’s management cautions shareholders and option holders that such increases in values are based on speculative assumptions and should not be the basis for expectations of the future value of their holdings.

 

68


Table of Contents

The following table provides information on option exercises in fiscal year 2003 by the Named Executive Officers and the value of such officer’s unexercised options as of September 30, 2003:

 

    

Shares

Acquired on
Exercise


   Value
Realized


   Number of Unexercised
Option Shares On
September 30, 2003


   Value of Unexercised In-
the-Money Option Shares
On September 30, 2003 $ (1)


Name


         Exercisable

   Unexercisable

   Exercisable

   Unexercisable

Doug Michels

   0    $ 0    259,723    68,626    $ 62,407    $ 13,000

Edmundo Costa

   0    $ 0    70,645    45,674    $ 25,780    $ 11,375

Steven M. Sabbath

   0    $ 0    108,374    36,108    $ 36,500    $ 8,126

Randall Bresee

   0    $ 0    113,214    55,199    $ 35,176    $ 8,125

(1)   Based on the market price of $1.30 per share, which was the closing price per share of the Company’s Common Stock on the Over-the-Counter Market on September 30, 2003, less the exercise price payable for such shares.

 

Employment Contracts and Change-In-Control Arrangements

 

In March 1996, the Board of Directors approved a resolution providing that prior to or after a change in control, as defined in the Option Plan, any outstanding options held by corporate officers that were granted pursuant to the Option Plan that are not at such time exercisable and vested shall become fully exercisable and vested.

 

The Company has entered into change in control agreements with each of the Named Executive Officers. Pursuant to these agreements, each such officer is eligible to receive, in the event that his or her employment is involuntarily terminated within one year following a change in control of the Company, an amount equal to the product of twelve (12) times his or her total monthly compensation including targeted bonuses at 100% attainment, continuation of health benefits available to him or her prior to the involuntary termination of employment for twelve (12) months thereafter and accelerated vesting on all options held. Pursuant to the terms of these agreements, a change in control is as defined in the Company’s 1994 Incentive Stock Option Plan.

 

Compensation of Directors

 

During fiscal year 2003, the Company made payments to the Outside Directors in an aggregate amount of eighty-seven thousand two hundred and seventy dollars ($87,270) for attendance to Board meetings (including committee meetings) during the fiscal year. The following payments were made to each outside director: Ninian Eadie, twenty-three thousand, and twenty dollars ($23,020); Ronald Lachman, six thousand two hundred and fifty dollars ($6,250); Robert McClure, thirty-five thousand two hundred and fifty dollars ($35,250); R. Duff Thompson, fifteen thousand, seven hundred and fifty dollars ($15,750); and Gilbert Williamson, seven thousand dollars ($7,000). The Company has a consulting agreement with chairman Mohan, pursuant to which the Company shall pay for consulting services pertaining to the general business of the Company. The details of this agreement are attached in exhibit 10.36. In fiscal year 2003, the Company paid Mr. Mohan $76,500 for consulting services. Directors are reimbursed for certain expenses in connection with attendance at board and committee meetings.

 

Outside Directors (i.e., non-employee directors) receive compensation for their service on the Board pursuant to the Director Plan. This compensation is in the form of stock options, or in the case of the Annual Grant, which is automatically granted on the first day of each fiscal year, cash may be elected in lieu of stock options. All current outside directors elected stock options for fiscal year 2003 except Dr. McClure.

 

69


Table of Contents

The Company’s Director Plan, which provides for the grant in non-statutory stock options to non-employee directors of the Company, was adopted by the Board of Directors in March 1993 and approved by the shareholders in May 1993. The Company has reserved a total of 300,000 shares of Common Stock for issuance pursuant to the Director Plan. The Director Plan is currently administered by the Board of Directors. Under the Director Plan, each non-employee director automatically receives a non-statutory option to purchase 8,000 shares of the Company’s Common Stock on the date upon which such person first becomes a director (the “Initial Grant”). In addition, each non-employee director who remains in continuous status as a non-employee director is automatically granted a non-statutory option (the “Annual Grant”) to purchase 32,000 shares of Common Stock on the first day of each fiscal year, 1,200 shares of which are pursuant to the Director Option Plan and 800 of which are pursuant to the Incentive Stock Option Plan.

 

An Outside Director is paid an annual retainer valued at $25,000. For Fiscal 2004 the annual retainer is payable 25% in cash ($6,250) plus at the directors’ election, either 18,750 shares of Common Stock or a stock option grant of 18,750 shares that vests quarterly over one year.

 

An Outside Director may elect to receive cash compensation in lieu of an Annual Grant. Each Outside Director who makes such an election shall receive cash compensation each quarter payable at a rate determined by the Board. In addition to the annual election of either cash compensation or stock options grants, each Board member also received the following payments for meeting attendance in fiscal 2003: one thousand dollars ($1,000) per regularly scheduled Board meeting attended in person, seven hundred fifty dollars ($750) per special meeting, which may be attended telephonically, and seven hundred fifty dollars ($750) per committee meeting, which may be attended telephonically.

 

Options granted under the Director Plan have a term of ten (10) years unless terminated sooner upon termination of the optionee’s status as a director or otherwise pursuant to the Director Plan. Such options are not transferable by the optionee other than by will or the laws of descent or distribution, and each option is exercisable during the lifetime of the director only by such director. The exercise price of each option granted under the Director Plan is equal to the fair market value of the Common Stock on the date of grant. Initial Grant options granted under the Director Plan vest cumulatively at the rate of one-twentieth (1/20th) of the shares subject to the option for every three months after the date of grant. Annual Grant options vest at a rate of one-fourth (1/4th) of the shares subject to the option for every three months after the date of grant.

 

In the event of a merger of the Company with or into another corporation or a consolidation, acquisition of assets of like transaction involving the Company immediately prior to occurrence of a change in control, any outstanding option shall become fully exercisable and vested.

 

Unless terminated sooner, the Director Plan will terminate on November 14, 2012. The Board has authority to amend or terminate the Director Plan provided no such action may affect options already granted and such options shall remain in full force and effect. As of September 30, 2003, options to purchase 66,600 shares of Common Stock at a weighted average exercise price (per share) of approximately $27.139 per share were outstanding and 197,000 shares remained available for future option grants under the Director Plan.

 

Report of the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors

 

The Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors serves as an administrative arm of the Board to make decisions regarding executive compensation and to make recommendations to the Board on compensation matters generally. The following is the report of the Compensation Committee describing compensation policies and rationale applicable to the Company’s executive officers with respect to the compensation paid to such executive officers for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2003. The information contained in such report shall not be deemed to be “soliciting material” or to be “filed” with the Securities and Exchange Commission, nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the Securities Act or Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference into such filing.

 

70


Table of Contents

General

 

The Compensation Committee is a standing committee comprised of three nonemployee directors. After evaluating management’s performance, the Compensation Committee recommends compensation and pay levels to the full Board for approval. Employee directors do not vote on their own compensation. Stock option grants to executive officers are approved by the Compensation Committee.

 

Overview and Policies for 2003

 

The goals of the Compensation Committee are to attract, motivate, reward, and retain the key executive talent necessary to achieve the Company’s business objectives and contribute to the long-term success of the Company. The Compensation Committee currently uses salary, bonus, and stock options to meet these goals.

 

In fiscal year 2003, the Compensation Committee reviewed the compensation of the Company’s key executive officers by evaluating each executive’s scope of responsibility, prior experience, and salary history, and also took into account the salaries for similar positions at comparable high technology companies. In reviewing the compensation, the Compensation Committee focused on each executive’s prior performance with the Company and expected contribution to the Company’s future success.

 

The Company provides long-term incentives to executive officers through the Option Plan. The purposes of the Option Plan are to attract and retain the best employee talent available and to create a direct link between compensation and the long-term performance of the Company. In general, the Option Plan incorporates four-year vesting periods to encourage employees to remain with the Company. The size of each option grant is based on the recipient’s position and tenure with the Company, the recipient’s past performance, and the size of previous stock option grants, primarily weighted toward the recipient’s position. In fiscal year 2003, the Company continued its policy of granting stock options to new employees and granted additional stock options to employees, including executive officers, who had made and were expected to make significant contributions to the Company’s development. These stock option grants were based primarily on the scope of the executive officer’s responsibilities at the Company and the remuneration to be paid to such officer.

 

The compensation for Douglas L. Michels in fiscal year 2003 was approved by the Board of Directors. The Compensation Committee made its recommendation and the Board made its determination of the Chief Executive Officer’s compensation after considering the same factors used to determine the compensation of other executive officers.

 

Summary

 

The Compensation Committee believes that the Company’s compensation has been successful in attracting and retaining qualified employees and in linking compensation directly to corporate performance relative to the Company’s goals. The Company’s compensation policies will evolve over time as the Company moves to attain the near-term goals it has set for itself while maintaining its focus on building long-term shareholder value.

 

Members of the Compensation Committee:

Ronald Lachman

Alok Mohan

Gilbert P. Williamson

 

71


Table of Contents

Performance Graph

 

Set forth below is a line graph comparing the annual percentage change in the cumulative return to the shareholders of the Company’s Common Stock with the cumulative return of the Nasdaq National Market Index and the Nasdaq Computer and Data Processing Stocks Index for the period commencing September 30, 1998 and ending on September 30, 2003. The information contained in the performance graph shall not be deemed to be “soliciting material” or to be “filed” with the Securities and Exchange Commission, nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the Securities Act or Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference into such filing.

 

The graph assumes that $100 was invested on September 30, 1998 in the Company’s Common Stock and in each index, and that all dividends were reinvested. No dividends have been declared or paid on the Company’s Common Stock. Shareholder returns over the indicated period should not be considered indicative of future shareholder returns. The Company operates on a 52-week fiscal year which ended on September 30, 2003.

 

Comparison of Five-Year Cumulative Total Returns

Performance Graph for

TARANTELLA, INC.

 

Produced on 12/19/2003 including data to 09/30/2003

 

LOGO

 

12313

     Prepared by CRSP (www.crsp.uchicago.edu), Center for Research in Security Prices, Graduate School of Business,
The University of Chicago. Used with permission. All rights reserved.©Copyright 2003

 

72


Table of Contents

The information contained above under the captions “Report of the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors” and “Performance Graph” shall not be deemed to be soliciting material or to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, (the “Securities Act”) or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference into such filing.

 

Item 12.    Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management

 

The following table sets forth certain information regarding the beneficial ownership of Common Stock of the Company as of December 31, 2003 as to (i) each person who is known by the Company to own beneficially more than five percent (5%) of the outstanding shares of its Common Stock, (ii) each director and each nominee for director of the Company, (iii) each of the executive officers named in the Summary Compensation Table below and (iv) all directors and executive officers as a group. This table is based on information provided to us or filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission by our directors, executive officers and principal shareholders. Except as other wise indicated, the Company believes that the beneficial owners of the shares listed below have sole investment and voting power with respect to such shares, subject to community property laws. The Company does not know of any arrangements, including any pledge by any person of securities of the Company, the operation of which may at a subsequent date result in a change of control of the Company. The address for each shareholder on this table is c/o Tarantella, Inc. 425 Encinal Street, Santa Cruz, California 95061-1900.

 

Five percent shareholders, directors, and

certain executive officers as of December 31, 2003


   Common
stock
outstanding


   Options/
Warrants
exercisable
within
60 days


   Common
stock
beneficially
owned


   Approximate
percentage
owned


 

Special Situations LP II

   3,462,500    1,862,500    5,325,000    31.1 %

Doug L. Michels (1)

   703,068    276,013    979,081    6.3 %

Vertical Ventures

   390,000    390,000    780,000    5.0 %

Alok Mohan

   126,967    193,497    320,464    2.1 %

Francis Wilde (2)

   300,000    50,000    350,000    2.3 %

Edmundo Costa

   11,857    80,219    92,076    *  

Ronald Lachman

   33,150    46,637    79,787    *  

Gilbert P. Williamson

   —      52,537    52,537    *  

Ninian Eadie

   —      50,637    50,637    *  

Robert M. McClure

   667    48,562    49,229    *  

R. Duff Thompson

   —      34,737    34,737    *  
    
  
  
  

All five percent shareholders, directors, executive officers and former executive officers as a group

   5,028,209    3,085,339    8,113,548    44.2 %
    
  
  
  


Applicable percentage of ownership is based on shares of Common Stock outstanding as of December 31, 2003 together with applicable options held by such shareholder. Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission and includes voting and investment power with respect to shares. Shares of Common Stock subject to options currently exercisable or exercisable within sixty (60) days after December 31, 2003 are deemed outstanding for computing the percentage ownership of the person holding such options, but are not deemed outstanding for computing the percentage of any other person.

 

*   less than 1% of common stock outstanding
(1)   Includes 15,000 shares gifted to the J3D Family Limited Partnership, of which Douglas Michels is the general partner; Mr. Michels is also a general partner in the Lawrence Michels Family Limited Partnership, of which he disclaims any voting or dispositive power.
(2)   Includes 250,000 shares owned by Starlight LP, an investment group in which Mr. Wilde acts as general partner.

 

73


Table of Contents

Item 13.    Certain Relationships and Related Transactions

 

In April 1999, the Company entered into a consulting agreement with Mr. Mohan, pursuant to which Mr. Mohan became an external consultant to the Company and his status as an employee ceased. The term of the agreement was for one year, commencing April 21, 1999, and was renewable by mutual agreement of both parties with approval by the Compensation Committee. As compensation for Mr. Mohan’s consulting services to the Company he received a fee target of one hundred and twenty-six thousand dollars ($126,000) per year, paid as follows: ninety thousand dollars ($90,000) annually as a retainer; and thirty-six thousand dollars ($36,000) annually as a target incentive. Incentive payments were made solely based upon the Company’s performance against its Revenue and EPS measures, paid in accordance with the provisions of the Company’s Management Incentive Plan. The consulting agreement expired April 21, 2000, and the Company entered into a new consulting agreement, commencing on April 22, 2000 and continuing through the completion of the acquisition by Caldera Systems, Inc. of the Company’s Server and Professional Services business. As compensation for Mr. Mohan’s consulting services to the Company he received five thousand dollars ($5,000) per month, with no incentive bonus. With the approval of the Compensation Committee, the Company entered into amendments to Mr. Mohan’s consulting agreement pursuant to which, the consulting agreement continued through January 2004, upon the same terms and conditions. As compensation for Mr. Mohan’s consulting services to the Company, he received a fee targeted at one hundred and eighty thousand dollars ($180,000) per year paid as follows: ninety thousand dollars ($90,000) annually as a retainer (paid monthly at seven thousand five hundred dollars ($7,500); and ninety thousand dollars ($90,000) annually (paid quarterly) as a target incentive. Incentive payments were made solely based upon the Company’s performance against its Revenue and Operating Income measures, and paid in accordance with the provisions of the Company’s Management Incentive Plan. Mr. Mohan received seventy-six thousand five hundred dollars ($76,500) for incentive payments during fiscal year 2003. For any quarter that the Company implements a “voluntary hour reduction” Mr. Mohan’s monthly retainer was reduced accordingly. Beginning in January 2003, his retainer was six thousand, three hundred and seventy-five dollars ($6,375). On January 19, 2004, the Company entered into a new agreement which will remain in effect until December 31, 2004. Mr, Mohan will receive $22,500 annually (paid monthly) cash compensation, and he will receive 67,500 shares of restricted stock. The Shares are subject to a risk of forfeiture in the event of certain terminations of service relationship, which risk of forfeiture will lapse over time based on continued performance of services or earlier upon a change of control of Tarantella, Inc. Mr. Mohan will also receive $90,000 annually (paid annually) as a target incentive. Incentive payments shall be made solely based upon Tarantella’s performance against its Revenue and Operating Income measures paid in accordance with the provisions of the Tarantella Management Incentive Plan. Mr. Mohan’s stock options previously held continue to vest over the term of the agreement and convert to non-statutory options. He continues to be covered under the Company’s medical, dental, and vision plans. In addition, Mr. Mohan will forego any compensation normally accorded to members of the Company’s Board of Directors for participation on the Board or for attendance at committee meetings and/or board meetings and will not be entitled to additional stock options granted to board members on an annual basis.

 

The J3D Family Limited Partnership and the Lawrence Michels Family Limited Partnership (both of which Doug Michels is general partner) are partners in Encinal Partnership No. 1 (“EP1”), which leases to the Company certain office premises located in Santa Cruz, California under two leases. The first lease commenced on January 1, 1989 and had a ten-year term, with two options for the Company to renew for five-year periods. The lease has been renewed through June 30, 2005. The lease covers approximately 50,830 square feet of building space at a current cost of approximately $94,587 per month, subject to an annual adjustment upward based on the Consumer Price Index. The second lease commenced on July 1, 1991 and had a seven-year term, with two options to renew for five-year periods. The second lease has been renewed through June 30, 2005. The second lease covers approximately 26,055 square feet of building space at a current cost of approximately $31,268 per month, subject to an annual adjustment based on the Consumer Price Index. Effective May 7, 2001 the second lease was assumed by Caldera International, Inc.

 

The third partner in EP1 is Wave Crest Development, Inc. (“Wave Crest”). Wave Crest leases to the Company 61,500 square feet of office space in Santa Cruz, California. From time to time, Douglas Michels

 

74


Table of Contents

engages in real estate transactions with Wave Crest and its president. Effective May 7, 2001, the aforementioned Wave Crest leases of 61,500 square feet of office space in Santa Cruz have been transferred to Caldera International, Inc.

 

The Company believes that the transactions described above were on terms no less favorable to the Company than could have been obtained from unaffiliated third parties. All future transactions between the Company and any director or executive officer are subject to approval by a majority of the disinterested members of the Board of Directors.

 

On December 26, 2003, the Company completed a private placement of common stock and warrants to the following investors: Special Situations Technology Funds (who are expanding on their previous investment), Starlight Digital Technologies, LLC, an investment group in which Mr. Wilde, the Company’s President, Chief Executive Officer and Director, acts as Managing Director, and an additional private investor, resulting in gross proceeds to the Company of approximately $2,750,000. In connection with the financing, the Company will pay placement fees in the amount of $91,250.

 

The Company has entered into indemnification agreements with each of its directors and executive officers. Such agreements require the Company to indemnify such individuals to the fullest extent permitted by California law.

 

The Compensation Committee makes recommendations to the Board of Directors concerning salaries and incentive compensation for directors and officers of the Company. Mr. Michels, who served as President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company during fiscal year 2003, is not a member of the Compensation Committee and cannot vote on matters decided by the Committee. Mr. Michels has participated in the discussions and decisions regarding salaries and incentive compensation for all employees of and consultants to the Company, except that Mr. Michels has been excluded from discussions and decisions regarding his own salary and incentive compensation. No executive officer of the Company serves as a member of the board of directors or compensation committee of any entity that has one or more executive officer serving as a member of the Company’s Board of Directors or compensation committee (“Interlock”). There are no Interlocks between the Company’s Board of Directors or Compensation Committee and boards of directors or compensation committees of other companies.

 

Item 14.    Principal Accountant Fees and Services

 

Deloitte & Touche LLP served as the Company’s independent auditors for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2003. The following table lists the aggregate fees billed for professional services rendered by Deloitte & Touche LLP for all “Audit Fees,” “Audit-Related Fees,” “Tax Fees,” and “All Other Fees” for the last two fiscal years.

 

     Fiscal Year Ended

     September 30,
2003


   September 30,
2002


Audit Fees (a)

   $ 236,951    $ 207,680

Audit-Related Fees (b)

   $ 434,965    $ 18,617

Tax Fees

   $ —      $ —  

All Other Fees

   $ —      $ —  

Total Fees

   $ 671,916    $ 226,297

(a)   Fees for audit services billed in 2003 and 2002 consisted of:
    Audit of the Company’s annual financial statements
    Reviews of the Company’s quarterly financial statements
    Comfort letters, statutory and regulatory audits, consents and other services related to Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) matters

 

75


Table of Contents
(b)   Fees for audit-related services billed in 2003 and 2002 consisted of:
    Accounting consultation in connection with the internal revenue investigation
    Due diligence associated with mergers/acquisitions
    Financial accounting and reporting consultations
    Opening and closing balance sheet audits/reviews of acquisitions and dispositions
    Review of the Company’s S-8

 

There are estimates included in the above table for fiscal 2003 for fees incurred but not yet billed. Estimates for the unbilled fees were provided by Deloitte & Touche LLP.

 

Audit Committee Authorization of Audit and Non-Audit Services

 

The Audit Committee has the sole authority to authorize all audit and non-audit services to be provided by the independent audit firm engaged to conduct the annual audit of the Company’s consolidated financial statements. In addition, the Audit Committee has adopted pre-approval policies and procedures that are detailed as to each particular service to be provided by the independent auditors, and such policies and procedures do not permit the Audit Committee to delegate its responsibilities under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, to management. The Audit Committee pre-approved fees for all audit and non-audit services provided by the independent audit firm during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2003 as required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

 

The Audit Committee has considered whether the provision of the non-audit services is compatible with maintaining the independent auditors’ independence, and has advised the Company that, in its opinion, the activities performed by Deloitte & Touche LLP on the Company’s behalf are compatible with maintaining the independence of such auditors.

 

76


Table of Contents

PART IV

 

SIGNATURES

 

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this Annual Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

 

       

TARANTELLA, INC.

By:   /s/    JOHN M. GREELEY               By:   /s/    JENNY TWADDLE        
   
         
   

John M. Greeley

Vice President,

Chief Financial Officer

Date: March 5, 2004

         

Jenny Twaddle

Vice President,

Corporate Controller

Date: March 5, 2004

 

KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THEIR PRESENCE, that each person whose signature appears below constitutes and appoints Thomas P. Rhodes, his attorney-in-fact, with the power of substitution, for him in any and all capacities, to sign any amendments to this report on Form 10-K and to file the same, with exhibits thereto other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorney-in-fact, or his substitute or substitutes, may do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

 

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated:

 

/s/    FRANCIS WILDE        

     

/s/    ALOK MOHAN        


     

Francis E. Wilde

President, Chief Executive Officer and Director

Date: March 5, 2004

     

Alok Mohan

Chairman of the Board of Directors

Date: March 5, 2004

 

/s/    DOUGLAS L. MICHELS        

     

/s/    ROBERT M. MCCLURE        


     

Douglas L. Michels

Director

Date: March 5, 2004

     

Robert M. McClure

Director

Date: March 5, 2004

 

/s/    GILBERT P. WILLIAMSON        

     

/s/    R. DUFF THOMPSON        


     

Gilbert P. Williamson

Director

Date: March 5, 2004

     

R. Duff Thompson

Director

Date: March 5, 2004

 

/s/    RONALD LACHMAN         

     

/s/    NINIAN EADIE         


     

Ronald Lachman

Director

Date: March 5, 2004

     

Ninian Eadie

Director

Date: March 5, 2004

 

77


Table of Contents

Item 15.    Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedule and Reports on Form 8-K

 

(a)   The following documents are filed as part of this report:

 

  1.   Financial Statements.
  2.   Financial Statement Schedule:

There are no Financial Statement Schedules listed since they are either not required, not applicable, or the information is shown in the financial statements or notes thereto.

  3.   Exhibits:

 

Exhibit
Number


  

Description


2.1    Agreement and Plan of Reorganization by and among Tarantella, Inc., Tarantella Acquisition Corporation and New Moon Systems, Inc. (5)
3.1    Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of Registrant.
3.2    Bylaws of Registrant, as amended. (2)
4.1    Specimen Common Stock Certificate of Registrant. (1)
4.2    Purchase Agreement by and between Tarantella, Inc. and certain investors.
4.3    Registration Rights Agreement by and between Tarantella, Inc. and certain investors.
4.4    Warrants by and between Tarantella, Inc. and certain investors.
4.5    Purchase Agreement by and between Tarantella, Inc. and Hitschler Enterprises, LLC and by and between Tarantella, Inc. and Starlight Technology Ventures, LLC.
4.6    Registration Rights Agreement by and between Tarantella, Inc. and Hitschler Enterprises, LLC and by and between Tarantella, Inc. and Starlight Technology Ventures, LLC.
4.7    Warrants by and between Tarantella, Inc. and Starlight Technology Ventures, LLC.
4.8    Warrants by and between Tarantella, Inc. and Hitschler Enterprises, LLC.
4.9    Purchase Agreement by and between Tarantella, Inc. and Special Situations Technology Fund II, LP.
4.10    Registration Rights Agreement by and between Tarantella, Inc. and Special Situations Technology Fund II, LP.
4.11    Warrants by and between Tarantella, Inc. and Special Situations Technology Fund II, LP.
10.13    Lease with Encinal Partnership No. 1 commencing January 1, 1989 (425 Encinal Street). (1)
10.17    Indemnification Agreement. (1)
10.18    Master Registration Rights Agreement as amended. (6)
10.19    Employee Stock Purchase Plan. (7)
10.20    2004 Incentive Stock Option Plan and form of Incentive Stock Option Agreement. (7)
10.21    401(k) Plan, as amended. (1) (7)
10.24    2003 Director Stock Option Plan. (7)
10.34    Shareholders’ Rights Agreement. (3)
10.35    Change-in-control agreement between the Company and certain key management. (4) (7)
10.36    Revised Employment Agreement with Alok Mohan.
14.1    Form of Tarantella, Inc. Code of Ethics for Chief Executive Officer, Senior Financial Officers and Employees with Financial Reporting Responsibilities
21.1    Subsidiaries of Registrant.
23.1    Independent Auditors’ Consent.
31.1    Certification of Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
31.2    Certification of Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32.1    Certification of Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
32.2    Certification of Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

(1)   Incorporated by reference to Registration Statement 33-60548 on Form S-1.
(2)   Incorporated by reference to the Form 10-K filed on December 22, 1995.
(3)   Incorporated by reference to the Form 8-A12G filed on September 18, 1997.

 

78


Table of Contents
(4)   Incorporated by reference to the Form 10-K filed on December 23, 1998.
(5)   Incorporated by reference to the Form 8-K filed on June 9, 2003.
(6)   Incorporated by reference to the Form 8-K filed on December 12, 2003.
(7)   Designates management contracts or compensatory plans, contracts or arrangements.

 

(b)   Reports on Form 8-K

 

The Company filed the following Report on Form 8-K’s during the twelve months ended September 31, 2003.

 

On September 11, 2003, the Company filed a Report on Form 8-K for On September 8, 2003, to disclose that the Company was expanding the analysis and review of its revenue recognition practices and that the Company’s Audit Committee had directed that the inquiry be expanded to include fiscal year 2002. The Company further announced that for the duration of the Audit Committee’s review, Alok Mohan, the Chairman of the Board, would serve as acting Chief Financial Officer. In the interim, the Company’s current Chief Financial Officer would continue to serve as Senior Vice President Operations.

 

On August 20, 2003, the Company filed a Report on Form 8-K to cancel its announcement of financial results for the fiscal third quarter ended June 30, 2003 which was scheduled to be held on August 19, 2003. The Company also announced it was evaluating the extent to which any corrections to its financials statements will be required.

 

On August 13, 2003, the Company filed a Report on Form 8-K announcing it was rescheduling its earnings announcement for its fiscal third quarter ended June 30, 2003 to August 19, 2003 in order to resolve issues related to the discovery of isolated unauthorized business practices within the sales force.

 

On July 28, 2003, the Company filed a Report on Form 8-K regarding its preliminary financial results for its third fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2003 and expense reduction measures, including a reduction of approximately 30% of the Company’s worldwide workforce.

 

On June 9, 2003, the Company filed a Report on Form 8-K for the completion of the acquisition of New Moon Systems, Inc., a privately-held California corporation (“New Moon”), in a merger of a wholly owned subsidiary of Tarantella (“Merger Sub”) with and into New Moon, pursuant to an Agreement and Plan of Reorganization (the “Agreement”), dated May 29, 2003, by and among Tarantella, Merger Sub and New Moon. The acquisition was completed on June 5, 2003.

 

On June 9, 2003, the Company filed a Report on Form 8-K to provide an unaudited pro forma balance sheet as of April 30, 2003, reflecting the impact of the acquisition of New Moon Systems, Inc., completed on June 5, 2003, as if such transaction were completed on April 30, 2003 on the Company’s balance sheet as of such date, as required by Nasdaq pursuant to the decision of the Listing Qualifications Panel on May 16, 2003.

 

On May 29, 2003, the Company filed a Report on Form 8-K to disclose the issuance of a press release announcing the signing of a definitive agreement regarding its proposed acquisition of New Moon Systems, Inc. The press release also announced that Tarantella planed to execute a reverse stock split at a ratio of one share for every five shares.

 

On April 22, 2003, the Company filed a Report on Form 8-K to disclose that on April 22, 2003, Tarantella, Inc. issued a press release regarding its financial results for its second fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2003.

 

On October 11, 2002 the Company filed a Report on Form 8-K to disclose the Company’s plan for a reduction in workforce.

 

79