UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
(Mark one)
x | ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the year ended December 31, 2003.
OR
¨ | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission file number: 0-21918
FLIR Systems, Inc.
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
Oregon | 93-0708501 | |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) | |
16505 S.W. 72nd Avenue, Portland, Oregon 97224 | (503) 684-3731 | |
(Address of principal executive offices) | (Registrants telephone number, including area code) |
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
Title of each class of Stock
Common Stock, $0.01 par value
Preferred Stock Purchase Rights
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of Registrants knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or amendment to this Form 10-K ¨
As of January 31, 2004, the aggregate market value of the shares of voting stock of the Registrant held by non-affiliates was $1,181,453,934.
Indicate by checkmark whether the Registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes x No ¨
As of June 30, 2003, the aggregate market value of the shares of voting stock of the Registrant held by non-affiliates was $984,750,772.
As of January 31, 2004, there were 33,128,330 shares of the Registrants common stock, $0.01, par value, outstanding.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE:
The Registrant has incorporated by reference into Parts II and III of this Form 10-K, portions of its Proxy Statement for its 2004 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.
FORM 10-K
ANNUAL REPORT
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PART I | ||||
Item 1 |
1 | |||
Item 2 |
17 | |||
Item 3 |
18 | |||
Item 4 |
18 | |||
PART II | ||||
Item 5 |
Market for Registrants Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters |
18 | ||
Item 6 |
19 | |||
Item 7 |
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
20 | ||
Item 7A |
35 | |||
Item 8 |
35 | |||
Item 9 |
Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure |
59 | ||
Item 9A |
59 | |||
PART III | ||||
Item 10 |
59 | |||
Item 11 |
59 | |||
Item 12 |
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters |
60 | ||
Item 13 |
60 | |||
Item 14 |
60 | |||
PART IV | ||||
Item 15 |
Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules, and Reports on Form 8-K |
60 | ||
63 | ||||
64 |
i
Forward-Looking Statements
This Annual Report on Form 10-K (the Report), including Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in Item 7 contains forward-looking statements regarding future events and the future results of FLIR Systems, Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries (FLIR or the Company) that are based on current expectations, estimates and projections about the Companys business, managements beliefs, and assumptions made by FLIRs management. Words such as expects, anticipates, intends, plans, believes, sees, estimates and variations of such words and similar expressions are intended to identify such forward-looking statements. These statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve risks, uncertainties and assumptions that are difficult to predict. Therefore, actual outcomes and results may differ materially from what is expressed or forecasted in such forward-looking statements due to numerous factors, including, but not limited to, those discussed in the Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in Item 7, including the section entitled Risk Factors located therein, and elsewhere in this Report as well as those discussed from time to time in the Companys other Securities and Exchange Commission filings and reports. In addition, such statements could be affected by general industry and market conditions. Such forward-looking statements speak only as of the date on which they were made and FLIR does not undertake any obligation to update any forward-looking statement to reflect events or circumstances after the date of this Report. If the Company updates or corrects one or more forward-looking statements, investors and others should not conclude that the Company will make additional updates or corrections with respect to other forward-looking statements.
ITEM 1. | BUSINESS |
General
We are a world leader in the design, manufacture and marketing of thermal imaging systems and infrared camera systems. Our products are used in a wide variety of applications in the commercial, industrial and government markets, internationally as well as domestically. We offer a variety of system configurations to suit specific customer requirements. Our business is organized into two divisions, Thermography and Imaging.
Thermography products are generally targeted into commercial and industrial applications. Most of our higher performance cameras incorporate temperature measurement capability, enabling the user to perform a wide variety of diagnostic and analytic activities. Applications for these cameras include electrical and mechanical preventative maintenance, process control, test and measurement and scientific analysis. These cameras are typically priced between $30,000 and $50,000.
We recently introduced two new, lower priced camera lines, the E-Series (in 2002) and the A-Series (in 2003), which have increased the number of markets and applications served by our Thermography division. These cameras range in price from $10,000 to $30,000 and address newer markets such as commercial and residential moisture detection and low cost process control applications, as well as a more value conscious customer in our traditional markets. All of our Thermography products may be either hand-held or fixed mounted. Thermography products are designed in Danderyd, Sweden and are produced on a state-of-the-art robotic assisted assembly line at that factory.
Our Imaging division offers a wide array of products, all of which allow the user to see in total darkness, and through many types of obscurants such as smoke, haze and most types of fog. We offer hand-held imaging systems as well as fixed mounted products specially designed for ground, airborne and marine applications. Examples of our Imaging products include hand-held systems used for reconnaissance, surveillance and law enforcement, stabilized gimbal mounted systems for fixed and rotary wing aircraft applications, fixed mounted ground systems for security and surveillance applications, and maritime systems designed to withstand the rigors
1
of a saltwater environment. Imaging products are often customized for their specific application. For example, systems may be gimbal mounted for stabilization; ruggedized for long-term use in difficult field environments; or sealed for protection against water and salt spray. Our products frequently incorporate additional sensors, including visible light cameras, laser rangefinders, laser illuminators, laser designators, and image analysis software. Imaging products range in price from under $12,000 for the least sophisticated hand-held imagers to more than $1 million for our most advanced stabilized airborne systems. Our large gimbal mounted systems, generally used in airborne applications, are produced in our Portland, Oregon factory, while our smaller gimbaled systems, as well as fixed mount and most hand-held systems, are produced in our factory in North Billerica, Massachusetts. We also produce certain Imaging systems in Sweden.
Our products offer state-of-the-art thermal imaging technology, sophisticated optics, software and electronics, innovative packaging and competitive pricing. We compete on the basis of product performance, quality, features and functions, customer service and training, distribution capability and price.
Our products utilize two types of infrared detectors. Our high performance products, typically with Imaging applications, utilize infrared detectors that are cooled with a micro-cooler that reduces the temperature of the detector to near absolute zero. This technique offers high sensitivity and resolution for long-range applications or those requiring high measurement precision. Most of our Thermography products and some Imaging products utilize a detector technology that does not require a micro-cooler, and is thus lighter, uses less power and is less expensive to produce. The performance of such uncooled detectors has improved in recent years, and as production volumes have increased, prices have dropped, spurring market expansion.
On October 22, 2003, we announced the acquisition of Indigo Systems Corporation, based in Goleta, CA, for total consideration of approximately $190 million. Indigo is a leading producer of infrared detectors and infrared camera subsystems and cameras. With this acquisition, we will now have the ability to design and produce both cooled and uncooled infrared detectors ourselves. Indigo will also expand our presence in certain markets, including high-end scientific cameras, sales of camera assemblies to original equipment manufacturers, and certain military program markets. The Indigo acquisition closed on January 6, 2004.
We have built a worldwide distribution system that allows us to sell our products in a wide range of international and domestic markets. In 2003, 43% of our revenue was derived from international customers, while no single customer accounted for more than 10% of our sales. In 2003, Thermography sales accounted for 38% of our total, while Imaging contributed 62%. We use a combination of direct sales and distributors, depending on product type and geographic area.
FLIR, an Oregon corporation, was incorporated in 1978. The Companys headquarters are located at 16505 SW 72nd Avenue, Portland, Oregon 97224-7705, and the telephone number at this location is (503) 684-3731. Information about the Company is available on the internet at www.flir.com.
Industry Overview
Infrared is electro-magnetic radiation that is not visible because its wavelength is too long to be detected by the human eye. Unlike visible light, infrared radiation is emitted directly by all objects above absolute zero in temperature. Thermal imaging systems detect infrared radiation and convert it into an electronic signal, which is then processed and formatted into a video signal and displayed on a video screen. Thermal imaging systems are different than other types of low light vision systems such as visible light intensification because an infrared system enables an operator to see objects in total darkness and through obscurants such as smoke, haze and most types of fog. Also, unlike visible light intensification technology, infrared imaging systems are not adversely affected by the presence of visible light, so they can be used day or night. Advanced thermal imaging systems can also detect and measure minute temperature differences, a critical tool for a variety of industrial applications.
An infrared detector, which absorbs infrared radiation and converts it into an electronic signal, is the primary component of thermal imaging systems. There are two primary types of infrared detectors, often referred
2
to as cooled and uncooled. Cooled detectors, which generally offer higher performance, must be cooled to very low temperatures (-196°C) in order to operate. This results in a system that is heavier, more complex and uses more power than uncooled detectors. Today, many of our products, especially in our Thermography division, use uncooled detectors that operate at room temperature, which allows for less expensive, smaller, lighter, more energy efficient systems. Using this technology, we have successfully introduced less expensive infrared cameras that have begun to open new market segments, such as building construction and inspections, industrial security and moisture detection. We have an exclusive relationship for the supply of uncooled detectors in certain key markets that is expected to expire during 2004 for certain detectors and 2005 for others. We expect to replace the majority of the detectors supplied under this contract with detectors produced by Indigo Systems Corporation, which we acquired in January 2004. It is our intention to maintain secondary sources of supply for uncooled detectors as well. We believe the Indigo acquisition will allow us to continue to obtain high quality uncooled detectors, at lower cost, while providing better control over future detector design.
We use cooled detectors in many of our Imaging systems, and expect demand for such technology to continue, particularly in applications where longer range, greater sensitivity and better resolution is critical. Such applications include military, law enforcement, long range surveillance and security, search and rescue and scientific research and development. We have developed our own micro-cooler that efficiently cools these detectors under battery power in most any environment. We currently purchase cooled detectors from three major suppliers. In the future, we expect Indigo to provide the majority of our cooled detectors, but we also intend to maintain secondary sources of supply.
Markets
The Company is divided into two main business segments, according to the markets they serve. The Thermography division produces systems that provide precise temperature measurement capabilities and are used for a variety of commercial and industrial applications. The Imaging division produces a wide range of systems that are used in such applications as long range surveillance, reconnaissance, search and rescue, security, force protection, targeting and law enforcement. Financial information about geographic and segment operations appears in Note 15 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8.
Thermography Market. The Thermography market is comprised of a broad range of thermal imaging applications where both imaging and temperature measurement are required. This market ranges from simple heat sensing devices to sophisticated radiometric (temperature measuring) instruments that allow the user to perform extensive analysis and data collection. Advances in uncooled thermal imaging technology has improved the functionality of Thermography products, lowered the cost of equipment, and expanded the markets beyond the traditional industrial, predictive and preventive maintenance segments. We expect new markets to continue to develop in the future.
The Thermography market primarily consists of the following end-user market segments:
Predictive Maintenance |
Thermal imaging systems are used for monitoring the condition of mechanical and electrical equipment. Such monitoring allows for the detection of equipment faults (manifested as hot spots) so they can be repaired before they fail. This increases the equipments productivity and avoids catastrophic failures or major equipment damage, which reduces operating expenses by lowering repair costs and reducing downtime. Improved functionality of image analysis software, smaller size and weight, and simplicity of system operation are critical factors for this market segment. Specific predictive maintenance applications include locating and repairing defective power transmission components or electrical connections, predicting the end of life of bearings in rotating machinery, evaluating the integrity or amount of insulation in a building or container and locating roof leaks and related damage. |
3
Research & Development |
Because of its non-destructive analysis capability, Thermography systems are a useful tool in a wide variety of research and development applications. As industry is driven to make smaller, lighter and more powerful electronic products, the problem of dealing with self-generated heat is becoming increasingly difficult. Our systems provide the ability to view thermal distribution in real time for products ranging in size from small hybrid integrated circuits to jet engines. Common applications include product development of microelectronics, cell phones, laptop computers, telecommunications equipment, consumer appliances, automotive components and aircraft engines. Systems used in research and development applications typically require very high imaging performance and measurement precision, coupled with extensive analysis and reporting software. | |
Manufacturing Process Control |
The ability to determine whether a manufacturing process will produce acceptable results at the earliest point in the production cycle is critical to quality assurance and cost reduction. Thermal imaging and image analysis allow for the monitoring and control of heat, which is used in virtually all industrial processes. Similarly, thermal imaging systems can identify moisture and contaminants and help identify the thickness of material as well as the integrity of the bonding of composite materials. Many processes that cannot be monitored visually because of obscurance from smoke or steam are readily visible using infrared imaging. | |
Thermal imaging applications for manufacturing process control include monitoring the quality of metal, plastic and glass cast parts, which are highly dependent upon the temperature distribution in the mold; monitoring the quality of paper, which is dependent upon proper and even moisture distribution during the drying process; and monitoring the quality of products such as rubber gloves, which can be thermally examined to locate abnormally warm or cool spots, indicating non-uniform thickness that may result in a quality defect. | ||
Emerging Thermography |
The newly introduced E-Series and A-Series products have expanded our traditional markets and opened new markets for our products. For example, smaller manufacturing facilities, electrical cooperatives and electrical contractors that could not justify the cost of a high-end product have purchased E-Series cameras to replace paid consultancy services. A special version of our E-Series camera, known as the ThermaCam® Scout, has been adapted to meet the needs of the emerging security markets at state and local law enforcement agencies. We have also entered the building inspection market with these products, as the growing concern over mold and unhealthy building environments has created a demand for technologies that can quickly locate the presence of moisture in commercial and residential buildings. Our new low cost A-Series fixed infrared cameras are now deployed into manufacturing environments that have not been able to solve quality problems with visual technology. | |
We expect additional market segments for thermal imaging to develop due to the lower cost and enhanced performance characteristics of uncooled thermal imaging technology. As system prices decline, |
4
thermal imaging technology will offer solutions for a wide variety of new commercial applications. These may include monitoring of food distribution, storage and preparation, veterinary science, automotive care, aircraft inspection, building heat-loss evaluation, maritime vessel inspections and electrical inspections. |
Imaging Market. The Imaging market is comprised of a broad range of applications where an infrared image is needed, but where temperature measurement is not required. The primary focus of this segment is to provide enhanced vision capabilities to a wide variety of military, paramilitary, law enforcement, public safety and commercial broadcast customers. Our systems typically provide the capability to see and record an object over long distances, day or night, through adverse weather conditions, from a wide variety of vehicle, man portable and fixed installation platforms. Although the majority of our infrared imaging applications require the use of cooled technology to identify objects from long distances, uncooled thermal imaging systems are also being used increasingly for certain ground-based security and hand-held observation applications. Customers in the military and law enforcement markets demand affordable high performance systems that can be mounted on a variety of helicopters, airplanes, ships and poles. These systems must operate in demanding climatic conditions and perform a variety of automated tasks requiring high image quality and stabilization. Software capabilities within the systems typically address certain customer requirements such as aircraft avionic integration or motion detection for security applications.
The Imaging market primarily consists of the following end-user market segments:
Search and Rescue |
Thermal imaging systems are used in airborne and shipborne search and rescue missions to rescue individuals in danger or distress on boats or in vehicles, to provide offshore oil platform safety and to provide emergency or disaster response support for missing persons or accident victims. Such systems are in use today by the US Coast Guard, the US Marines, the US Air National Guard and the United Kingdom Ministry of Defense. | |
Federal Drug Interdiction |
Thermal imaging systems enable government agencies to expand their drug interdiction and support activities by allowing greater surveillance and detection capabilities. Our systems are in use by the US Customs Service, the DEA and the FBI, as well as by foreign governments. | |
Surveillance and Reconnaissance |
Thermal imaging systems are used in surveillance and reconnaissance applications for the precise positioning of objects or people from substantial distances and for enhanced situation awareness, particularly at night or in conditions of reduced or obscured visibility. Our systems are in use today by the US Army, the US Air Force, and many federal law enforcement agencies. | |
Navigation Safety |
Thermal imaging systems are used in navigation safety applications to improve missions by enabling crews piloting aircraft or ships to see terrain and objects and to detect and avoid obstacles at night and in conditions of limited visibility due to smoke, haze or fog. | |
Border and Maritime Patrol |
Thermal imaging systems are used in airborne, shipborne and fixed installation applications for border and maritime surveillance, particularly at night, to monitor borders and coastal waters, to monitor national fishing boundaries and to prevent smuggling. FLIR cameras are currently deployed along the US borders under the US Border Patrols ISIS program and are also used by the Royal Australian Air Force on their P3-C MPA aircraft. |
5
Environmental Monitoring |
Thermal imaging systems are used in environmental monitoring applications including forest fire detection and suppression, oil spill detection and monitoring and wildlife management. | |
Perimeter Security |
Thermal imaging systems are used for ground-based surveillance and perimeter security of government, military and industrial facilities, particularly at night. The US Air Force is currently using FLIR cameras extensively for force protection at its foreign airbase locations under its TASS program. | |
Electronic News Gathering |
The use of airborne observation and broadcast systems has become a standard tool for television stations and broadcast networks. News stations with this capability have the ability to provide close-up coverage of events, disasters or safety restricted areas to their viewing audiences. This market segment typically requires very high performance daylight cameras installed in highly stabilized gimbal turrets for mounting on news helicopters. Systems need to provide high-resolution, jitter-free video that can be downlinked to the production studio or command center on a real-time basis. | |
Law Enforcement |
We are a leader in the supply of stabilized airborne thermal imaging systems for federal, state and local law enforcement agencies. Agencies with this type of equipment have the ability to track suspects, locate lost people and provide situational awareness to officers on the ground. Systems designed for this market typically have both an infrared and a visible light camera installed in a smaller, lightweight gimbal. Systems must be reliable, easy to use and have good imaging and recording capabilities. Applications should increase as system size and weight continue to decline, enabling the use of systems on small and weight-restricted helicopters and fixed wing aircraft. In addition, law enforcement agencies have established thermal imaging as a primary support tool and should continue to take advantage of public support for this type of law enforcement. | |
Targeting |
The use of thermal imaging technology is becoming increasingly prevalent in the military community. FLIRs thermal imaging systems provide clear views of targets at long ranges through darkness or other environmental obscurants. These systems are frequently used together with conventional day sighting devices and offer a clip-on night operation capability to existing weapons. FLIR offers several products in this application ranging from a clip-on rifle scope device to a high precision stabilized airborne laser designator system. |
Technology
We use our expertise in systems design, infrared and other technologies, and manufacturing to develop and produce sophisticated thermal imaging systems. In order to produce cost-effective products and shorten the product development cycle, we integrate the following engineering disciplines and manufacturing processes:
System Design and Radiometry |
Our extensive experience in stabilization, packaging and systems integration allow us to effectively combine a wide variety of technologies to design and manufacture thermal imaging systems to suit |
6
our customers needs. We also possess the specialized system design knowledge required to produce thermal imaging systems that can accurately measure temperature, a critical tool for many commercial and industrial applications. | ||
Mechanical Engineering |
Our design and production of thermal imaging systems involves highly sophisticated mechanical engineering techniques. Such skills are critical for the design and assembly of the supporting structures for system components such as detector arrays, coolers, scanners and optics, which must meet high-precision mechanical tolerances. Similarly, the gyro-stabilized gimbal assembly for products such as the Star SAFIRE II, Star SAFIRE III, Ultra 8500, SeaFLIR II, and UltraMedia requires expertise in electro-mechanical control, gyroscopes and specialized stabilization controls. | |
Electronic Design |
We design signal processing circuits that interface directly with the detector arrays to convert detected infrared radiation into electronic signals. We also design the electronic image processing that is necessary to convert the electronic signals into standard video format. Our design expertise lies in the areas of reliability, low power consumption and extreme environmental survivability. | |
Software Development |
We believe that software development is important to the ongoing improvement in our products. In 2003, FLIR introduced a variety of software releases that have tuned our standard camera products to more effectively meet the needs of new and emerging markets. Our products utilize a combination of embedded and desktop software products. Currently, we possess the capability to develop and refine all types of software used in our systems. We also develop and deploy software that is used for testing and characterization of our systems. | |
Optical Design and Fabrication |
We currently design and manufacture many of the sophisticated optics that are required to produce a thermal imaging system. This capability allows us to significantly shorten the product development cycle and avoid costs and delays associated with a reliance on third-party optics suppliers. | |
Optical Coating |
Infrared optics require custom vapor deposited coatings to improve the transmission of the unique lens materials that are used in infrared systems. These coatings are essential to maximizing the performance and thermal sensitivity of the systems. FLIR has developed the in-house capability for high volume production coatings and for the development and testing of new coatings to lower costs and improve performance and field ruggedness of the infrared lenses. |
The acquisition of Indigo Systems will add significantly to our technology base and in-house expertise, particularly in the area of integrated circuit design, infrared detector technology, and software design.
Research and development expenses were $30.7 million in 2003, $26.9 million in 2002 and $27.2 million in 2001. We anticipate that we will continue to have significant research and development expenses in the future to provide a continuing flow of innovative and high quality products to maintain and enhance our competitive position in both of our business segments.
7
Products
Thermography Products. In the Thermography division, we manufacture products that are sold to a wide range of commercial customers, including electric utilities, manufacturing industries, building inspectors and machine vision customers. For industrial customers, we have developed infrared imaging systems that feature accurate temperature measurement, storage and analysis. These systems comprise two categories: hand-held cameras and fixed installation cameras. All systems use a common-core imaging system, and the majority uses uncooled infrared detector technology. Many of our hand-held cameras look and function much like a standard camcorder, utilizing off-the-shelf technologies for battery power, data recording and image display. The fixed installation cameras are housed in industrial enclosures and have connectivity capability with common factory automation systems. The products are evolved on an annual basis with new models being introduced to the market featuring enhancements in functionality and performance based on customer requests. This keeps the product line up to date, competitive and enables us to generate revenue from system upgrades.
Our strong market share position is enhanced and maintained with the offering of key post-processing software packages. Approximately 100 different accessories are available to customize the product to a wide range of imaging and measurement applications.
We offer training on the principles of thermography and the use of our products through the ITC®, our Infrared Training Center, which provides comprehensive training, certification and applications engineering from several FLIR locations or at the customers site. We have begun to license Infrared Training Centers to qualified third parties in certain countries. In 2003, over 3000 people received training at our Infrared Training Center.
During 2002, Thermography launched completely new products for its core and emerging markets. The new product families are called ThermaCAM® P-Series, ThermaCAM® S-Series, and ThermaCAM® E-Series. In 2003, Thermography launched the completely new ThermoVision® A-Series products to support fixed installation applications.
ThermaCAM® P-Series |
The P-Series line of hand-held thermal imaging and measurement systems, introduced in 2002, is a state-of-the-art, high performance hand-held thermal imaging and measurement system. Designed for the professional thermographer, the P-Series line of Thermography cameras provides for accurate temperature measurement of objects from 40°C to +2000°C. The system features numerous automated features, offering one-hand, point and shoot operation and offers significantly enhanced sensitivity, improved data connectivity, automatic report generation, auto focus and an innovative new product design that incorporates a detachable color LCD display. The ThermaCAM® series cameras have applications across all commercial thermography market segments, including predictive and preventive maintenance of electrical, mechanical and building HVAC systems, locating and repairing defective power transmission components or electrical connections, predicting the end of life of bearings in rotating machinery, preventing unscheduled downtime, evaluating the integrity or amount of insulation in a building and locating roof leaks and related damage. | |
ThermaCAM® E-Series |
The E-Series product line of Thermography cameras, introduced in March of 2002, pioneers a new market segment for the Thermography business. The cameras, which resemble a flashlight in appearance, weigh only 1.5 pounds and feature a built-in color display, long-life battery, temperature measurement and image storage capabilities. The new cameras also enable images to be downloaded to a computer |
8
through its USB port connection, the same connection used by consumer video cameras. The E-Series products are small enough to wear on a belt in the same way electricians now carry small voltage and amp meters. This new product line is ideal for applications such as building diagnostics, electrical inspection, and veterinary evaluations in addition to predictive maintenance and process control. | ||
ThermaCAM® S-Series |
The ThermaCAM® S-Series cameras are similar to the P-Series cameras except they typically incorporate high-definition cooled focal plane array sensors that offer an increased level of sensitivity, image quality and measurement precision. The S-Series cameras are designed primarily for high-end research and development applications. The SC1000 utilizes a cooled platinum silicide detector and is well suited for applications in the glass, plastics and petroleum refining industries. The S60 and S40 utilize an uncooled microbolometer detector and are well suited for general research and development applications such as product thermal testing or PC board inspections. These new products also feature firewire digital output for high speed image and data transfer. The SC3000 is the worlds first production quantum well infrared photodetector (QWIP) based camera and features extremely high sensitivity (0.03°C) and long-wave operation. This camera is well suited for product development applications and certain medical research applications. | |
ThermoVision® A-Series |
In 2003, we replaced the ThermoVision® 320 and 160 Series with a new line of uncooled thermal imaging cameras, known as the ThermoVision A-Series, for manufacturing process control and machine vision applications. The ThermoVision A40 offers high-resolution imaging and temperature measurement performance while the ThermoVision A20 offers strong performance in a small and affordable 160 x 120 package. Operating as a remote controlled smart sensor in supervised operation or integrated into a complete control system, the ThermoVision camera transmits data on a continuous real-time basis to factory automation equipment. Using built-in intelligence, the ThermoVision can process multiple areas of interest, trigger alarms or transmit control data. Examples of ThermoVision applications include monitoring and controlling the manufacture of metal, plastic or glass parts, where thermal properties are critical to the final product. ThermoVision sensors are used to provide the real-time feedback to reduce warranty claims and assure consistent product quality. | |
ThermaCAM® Reporter |
The ThermaCAM® Reporter Suite has been redesigned to work within with Microsoft® Word and the latest Microsoft® Office environment. This release has made infrared report generation faster and easier than before by embedding tools that analyze thermal images right inside the word processing environment our customers are most familiar with. This program saves a great deal of time by allowing our customers to simply drag and drop images from our cameras storage medium into prepared reports that automatically place thermal, visual and text information into the right location on a standard Microsoft® Word document. |
9
ThermaCAM® Researcher |
The ThermaCAM® Researcher is a suite of Windows®-based analysis software and interconnect hardware for the SC series cameras. First introduced in the first quarter of 2000, this software and hardware product allows design engineers to evaluate static or dynamic thermal events and data. Information is captured and stored on standard PC memory devices and can be analyzed in real time with this software package. The product is used in applications including product development, failure analysis, pilot production monitoring and thermal management. |
Imaging Products. In the Imaging division, we manufacture products that are sold to military, paramilitary, law enforcement, surveillance and security customers. Typically we provide vision enhancement capability to people who need to see in the dark, through adverse environments, or from mobile platforms. We address several key end-user segments, including airborne, ground, maritime, broadcast, industrial security, military targeting and fire service markets. For airborne applications, we have developed highly stabilized turrets (gimbals), which typically contain one or more of the following: an infrared imaging system, a visual camera, a laser rangefinder, a laser illuminator, a laser designator and a long-range visible light spotter scope. The systems typically have sophisticated embedded software providing tracking, GPS, moving maps and aircraft information. For ground applications, we manufacture three types of products: hand-held products, platform mounted products and targeting products. All ground systems have a high performance infrared camera coupled with an infrared lens system. Some units have visual cameras on board and an integrated pan and tilt capability. Platform mounted units are typically housed in a weather-tight enclosure and feature remote control capabilities and multi-sensor integration capability (CCTV, Laser Range Finder, Compass, GPS). Hand-held ground products typically look like militarized camcorders or electronic binoculars. They typically are very rugged and have optional lenses and target location capabilities. Targeting products are typically designed to attach to existing daylight sights to provide bore-sighted nighttime capabilities. Some targeting systems are hand-held or tripod-mounted, and provide detailed target location data through the use of other position sensing technologies. For maritime applications, we manufacture a mix of airborne and shipborne products. The products are similar to inverted airborne gimbals, but have a high level of customization for the marine environment. Enhancements include hermetic sealing, on-board heaters, wipers and corrosion resistant coatings. Maritime units typically incorporate infrared cameras, visual cameras and laser rangefinders.
In the broadcast market, we manufacture highly stabilized gimbals that house broadcast quality TV cameras. The product is typically mounted to an aircraft, usually a helicopter, and operated by the use of a remote hand controller, which directs the stabilized gimbal and controls the camera functions. The broadcast camera inside the gimbal provides the video output that is then either recorded on a video recorder or down-linked to a production studio for live broadcast. These systems are widely used by television news stations and law enforcement professionals.
In the law enforcement market, we manufacture a variety of stabilized gimbal systems that typically contain both infrared and visible light cameras. These systems provide high-resolution imagery, day or night, for covert surveillance, public safety and search and rescue applications. The systems are typically mounted to a helicopter and greatly enhance the capabilities of officers during night operations.
Star SAFIRE II |
Introduced in April of 1999, the Star SAFIRE II is an enhanced evolution on the Star SAFIRE. The system features improved performance through the use of a military qualified gyro-stabilized gimbal and a micro-scanned indium antimonide third generation focal plane array detector. Typical configurations contain multiple optical payloads in addition to the infrared imaging system, including a TV camera with a zoom lens for daylight operations, a long-range daylight spotter scope, laser rangefinder, laser illuminator or laser designator. |
10
Examples of Star SAFIRE II applications include search and rescue, maritime patrol, unmanned air vehicles (UAV), reconnaissance missions, border and coastal surveillance and target identification and designation. | ||
Star SAFIRE III |
Introduced in June of 2003, the Star SAFIRE III is an enhanced evolution on the Star SAFIRE II. The system features improved performance through the use of a 640 X 480 micro-scanned indium antimonide third generation focal plane array detector which offers four times the number of pixels compared to the Star SAFIRE II systems. As with the Star SAFIRE II, typical configurations contain multiple optical payloads in addition to the infrared imaging system, including a TV camera with a zoom lens for daylight operations, a long range daylight spotter scope, laser rangefinder, laser illuminator or laser designator. The Star SAFIRE III also offers a significantly improved long range TV spotter scope and an optional image intensified camera capability that can be mixed with the infrared or conventional TV image to enhance imaging performance. | |
Star-Q |
The Star-Q system, first introduced in the second quarter of 2001, is a digital airborne system with a high-performance long-wave focal plane array sensor, based on quantum well infrared photodetector (QWIP) technology. The unit represents the first long-wave Gen-III system on the market, and offers distinct advantages in certain cold weather and fire fighting applications. The units 4-axis gyro-stabilized gimbal typically contains a three field-of-view infrared QWIP imager, 3-CCD color TV camera and high power spotter scope. The Star-Q is a commercially developed, military qualified (CDMQ) product, which is available for commercial off-the-shelf (COTS) delivery into military and paramilitary programs. It has already been selected by the United Kingdom Ministry of Defense and the Swiss Air Force for specific programs. | |
ThermoVision®2000 |
The ground-based ThermoVision® 2000, first introduced in the second quarter of 2001, is a fixed- or tripod-mounted thermal imaging system that can detect small objects at 10 or more kilometers away under extreme environmental conditions, day or night. The system utilizes the QWIP-based thermal sensor from the Star-Q system and thus represents the first Gen-III long-wave focal plane array system to the market. The system features mission specific optical configurations and a highly ruggedized enclosure. Capable of remote operation, the system has on-board image processing capabilities, which enhance target detection and identification. Examples of ThermoVision 2000 applications include perimeter security of military bases and sensitive government installations or buildings. | |
ThermoVision® Sentry |
The ground-based ThermoVision® Sentry, first introduced in the fourth quarter of 1998, is the first fixed- or tripod-mounted thermal imaging system featuring uncooled detector technology. Using this technology, this system can operate unattended for very long periods of time without maintenance. The system incorporates a sophisticated, highly accurate pan and tilt mechanism, high speed pointing capability and automated scanning functions. Designed for automated perimeter or |
11
facility surveillance, the system has on-board image alarm functions and bi-directional remote communication capabilities. A lower cost version of this product was developed in the first quarter of 2001. This version, the Sentry POD, eliminates the pan and tilt mechanism and allows security system integrators to use their own pan and tilt systems and enclosures. The Sentry POD was selected by the US Border Patrol for the ISIS border surveillance program in 2001. Examples of ThermoVision Sentry applications include perimeter security of high value or high security environments, border patrol and coastal surveillance applications. | ||
SeaFLIR II |
The SeaFLIR II, which evolved from the US Navy MarFLIR contract and was introduced in the second quarter of 2003, is an inverted stabilized 9 gimbal infrared imaging system designed specifically for the marine environment. Able to withstand significant shock, vibration, and sea-spray, the SeaFLIR II is hermetically sealed and contains an on-board de-icing system. The system incorporates a high performance indium antimonide infrared focal plane array sensor with a 10x continuous zoom lens, a laser rangefinder and an auto-tracker. This system is designed to be mounted on a mast, wheelhouse or a weapons platform. Examples of SeaFLIR II applications include foul weather navigation, anti-piracy, search and rescue, mine detection and collision avoidance. | |
MilCAM Family |
The MilCAM system, introduced in 1997, is a high performance hand-held infrared imaging system designed for tactical use by military, paramilitary and law enforcement agencies engaged in long-range surveillance, target observation, artillery observation/fire correction, perimeter security and border surveillance. The system offers high-resolution imaging in total darkness, through smoke, haze and other obscurants. Small and lightweight, the system uses off-the-shelf batteries and weighs less than 5 pounds. Currently available in three models, the MilCAM LE (1997), XP (1999) and Recon (2001), the MilCAM line leads the market in small size, low power and long-range capabilities. The MilCAM LE features a cooled platinum silicide detector and is designed for law enforcement applications. The MilCAM XP features a high performance indium antimonide detector offering detection beyond 5 kilometers. The MilCAM Recon is the next generation of the MilCAM XP. Utilizing a larger detector, new electronics and new packaging, the Recon has improved range and definition as compared to prior models. Examples of MilCAM applications include perimeter security, coastal surveillance, special operations, police surveillance and search and rescue. | |
MilCAM SeeSpot III |
The MilCAM SeeSpot III, first introduced in the second half of 2001, is a hand-held dual-band infrared imaging system that allows military personnel to identify targets at long range and then also validate the location of laser designator spot locations on the targets. The SeeSpot III is the smallest and lightest product with this capability and eliminates the need to carry separate devices for infrared imaging and laser spot identification. The SeeSpot III is currently in use by several branches of the US Special Forces and certain foreign military organizations. |
12
Ranger II |
The Ranger II, introduced in the third quarter of 2003, is a high performance fixed mount infrared imaging system designed for tactical use by military, paramilitary and law enforcement agencies engaged in long-range surveillance, target observation, artillery observation/fire correction, perimeter security and border surveillance. The system offers high-resolution imaging in total darkness, through smoke, haze and other obscurants. Small and lightweight, the system can be rapidly deployed on a tripod or in a fixed installation. The system features remote control, integrated pan and tilt and very long-range performance. | |
UltraMedia III |
The UltraMedia III, introduced in the second quarter of 1999, is a high-resolution, high stabilization electronic news gathering system for airborne use. Utilizing the latest broadcast camera technology, the UltraMedia III offers industry leading magnification and stability. The hermetically sealed gimbal is small and lightweight and has been certified for use on most commercial helicopters. The UltraMedia series electronic news gathering products are the most widely used airborne camera systems in the world today. | |
UltraMedia LE |
The UltraMedia LE, introduced in the fourth quarter of 1999, is a compact digital low-light surveillance system that delivers similar performance to the UltraMedia III systems, but also adds extreme low-light imaging capability providing covert surveillance capabilities at night. The product was developed to meet the needs of federal, state and local law enforcement agencies desiring covert observation capabilities at extreme standoff distances. | |
FireFLIR®130 |
The FireFLIR® 130, introduced in the second quarter of 2001, is a lightweight, hand-held, thermal imaging system for fire fighting applications. Weighing about 5 pounds, the FireFLIR incorporates an uncooled microbolometer detector that delivers crisp, high-resolution monochrome and color images. The systems unique design allows it to be used as a crawling aid during attack and rescue missions. The system features automated capabilities for locating hot spots in walls and determining the temperature of objects in the scene. An optional microwave transmitter sends the video signal to a remote location for other crewmembers to view. | |
Ultra 8000 Ultra 8500 Ultra 8500FW |
The Ultra 8000, Ultra 8500 and Ultra 8500FW, first introduced in the second quarter of 2003, is a family of products that are an evolution of FLIRs successful Ultra 7500 airborne gimbal-mounted, dual imaging system. The three new products offer a range of performance and prices to suit a variety of law enforcement missions and budgets. The new systems incorporate a high-resolution, state-of-the-art indium antimonide infrared imaging detector and advanced all-digital imaging electronics. All of the systems have design elements that improve performance, ease of use and overall reliability. At 9 in diameter and 26 pounds, the Ultra 8000 series is the smallest and lightest high performance airborne law enforcement system available. Industry-leading features include a continuous zoom infrared lens, built-in auto-tracking capability, GPS annotation and easy to use hand controller. |
13
The system is designed primarily for law enforcement applications where the continuous zoom and auto-tracker aid in keeping suspects in the field of view. The systems small size and light weight make it attractive for use on smaller, less expensive helicopters which are typically used by US law enforcement agencies. The system is also available as the MicroSTAR II with a reduced size electronics set, remote control capabilities and optimized stabilization for use in unmanned aircraft applications. | ||
UltraForce II |
The UltraForce II, introduced in the fourth quarter of 2000, is a high performance multi-sensor gyro-stabilized gimbal system designed for law enforcement or paramilitary use. The system incorporates a high performance, cooled infrared imaging sensor, utilizing QWIP technology, together with a high-resolution 3-chip CCD TV camera capable of imaging in moderately low light conditions. This product represents the first long-wave focal plane array based gimbal in the commercial market. Features include triple infrared fields-of-view, 54X TV image magnification and high magnification spotter scope or laser rangefinder. Targeted at higher-end law enforcement agencies flying larger twin-engine helicopters, the UltraForce II is the premier law enforcement product available today. | |
ThermoVision® FTI |
The ThermoVision® FTI, first introduced in early 2002 is a third-generation thermal imager based on QWIP technology. The system is a militarized hand-held or tripod-mounted thermal imager designed for use by forward observer troops. The FTI is currently designed for integration with a Simrad LP 10 Target Locator to provide accurate target positioning but can also be used on its own as a hand-held thermal imager. FLIR is currently under contract (through Simrad Optronics) to supply the FTI system to the Swedish and Norwegian armed forces. | |
ThermoVision® BIRC |
The ThermoVision® BIRC, first introduced in late 2001, is a product that adds night capability to existing missile launching systems in use in Europe today. The BIRC system uses a cooled QWIP detector, operating in the long wave infrared band. Ideal for operation in cold climates, the BIRC system can be either troop or vehicle deployed. The BIRC can be adapted to a variety of missile systems in use today, including the Milan and TOW missiles. | |
SnipIR |
The SnipIR, first launched in early 2001, is a clip-on infrared device that adds night capability to a standard sniper day-scope. The system uses a cooled indium antimonide detector and provides precise targeting capability with a matched field of view seen through the day scope of the rifle. An innovative image fusion mode allows the operator to blend infrared and daylight images for maximum target discrimination. The SnipIR is currently used by US and foreign special forces. |
Customers
The primary customers for our products include domestic and foreign government agencies, including military, paramilitary and police forces, original equipment manufacturers, commercial manufacturers, research
14
and development facilities, universities, industrial companies, utility companies, news gathering agencies and numerous commercial enterprises. Our customers are located around the world and are serviced by a global distribution organization covering more than 60 countries.
A substantial portion of our revenue is derived from sales to US and foreign government agencies and our business will continue to be substantially dependent upon such sales. No sales to a single agency of the US Government accounted for more than 10% of our revenue in 2003, but aggregate sales to US Government agencies accounted for 26% of our revenue for 2003. Financial information about geographic operations and customers appears in Note 15 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8.
Sales and Distribution
We believe our sales and distribution organization is the largest in the industry and effectively covers the world with a combination of direct sales, independent representatives and distributors, application engineers, service and training centers. Our Thermography and Imaging products are highly technical and have distinct characteristics and functionality. Our sales personnel undergo a comprehensive training program on the technical aspects of the products, as well as to familiarize them with product applications. We also continuously update our training programs to incorporate technological and competitive shifts and changes.
We have distinct sales channels for industrial, surveillance, building diagnostics, airborne, ground, maritime, security, broadcast and fire service customers. We sell our Thermography products worldwide through a direct sales staff of more than 100 people and a network of over 150 distributors (many with multiple offices) and representatives. We sell our Imaging products through a direct sales staff of approximately 90 people and 50 independent representatives and distributors covering all major markets worldwide. Included in this total are technical and customer support staff in the United States and Europe who provide application development, technical training and operational assistance to direct and indirect sales personnel as well as to customers.
Marketing
With our expansion into the low cost segment of the commercial markets, our Thermography business has developed more focused competencies in market research, electronic marketing, marketing communications and business development. Our early success in promoting our products into newer commercial and security and surveillance markets can in a large part be attributed to our ability to identify new markets, tune our product solutions to meet unique market needs, quickly develop marketing communications that highlight these unique features, and leverage existing and new distribution channels to develop incremental business.
Our Imaging business focuses its product marketing activities on internet promotion, advertising, direct mail, press tours, technical articles for publications and participation in approximately 150 trade shows per year. These activities give us the opportunity to educate potential customers about the key features and attributes of our products and how they may be used to address specific customer needs.
Customer Service
We maintain service facilities at our factories in Portland, Oregon; North Billerica (Boston), Massachusetts; Danderyd (Stockholm), Sweden; and West Malling (London), United Kingdom; and at our locations in Antwerp, Belgium; Frankfurt, Germany; Toronto, Canada; Paris, France; Milan, Italy and Hong Kong. Each of our service facilities has the capability to perform the complex calibrations required to service commercial thermal imaging systems. We employ more than 50 people worldwide in our service organizations. We also maintain field service capabilities in five additional foreign locations under the direction of our independent representatives or distributors. Subsequent to the closing of the Indigo acquisition, we will also maintain service facilities at Goleta (Santa Barbara), California.
15
Backlog
At December 31, 2003 and 2002, we had an order backlog of $146 million and $92 million, respectively. Backlog is defined as orders received for products or services for which a sales agreement is in place and delivery is expected within twelve months. Backlog may not be indicative of revenue for any future periods because our sales to Thermography customers are generally made pursuant to purchase orders rather than long-term contracts and, accordingly, the Thermography backlog at any given time is for short-term shipments. In addition, the backlog for the Imaging business is heavily dependent upon the timing of receipt of government contracts that may have multiple year delivery schedules. Furthermore, delivery schedules are frequently revised to accommodate changes in customer needs. Although orders received by us are generally subject to cancellation, in the case of most orders included in backlog, the customer is generally obligated to pay certain costs and/or penalties for cancellation.
Manufacturing
We manufacture many of the critical components for our products, including gimbals, optics, micro-coolers and high-speed motors, which minimizes lead times, facilitates prompt delivery of our products, controls costs and ensures that these components satisfy our quality standards. We purchase other parts pre-assembled, including detectors, certain coolers and optics, circuit boards, cables and wiring harnesses. These components are then assembled into finished systems and tested at one of our production facilities.
We have invested in automated production equipment for our Thermography manufacturing facility in Sweden, to support the volume demands now generated by the new E-Series camera products. This automation includes robotic cell calibration facilities that have increased unit throughput.
The acquisition of Indigo Systems Corporation, which was completed on January 6, 2004, will enable us to design and manufacture our own infrared detectors.
We purchase certain key components from sole or limited source suppliers. Accordingly, we could experience late deliveries or a scarcity in the supply of some of these components.
Our manufacturing operations are, from time to time, audited by certain of our OEM customers, which include several major aircraft manufacturers, and have been certified as meeting their quality standards. Our facilities in Boston, Portland and London are ISO 9000:2000 certified. Our facility in Stockholm is ISO 9001:2000 certified. Indigo Systems Corporation is also ISO 9001:2000 certified.
Competition
Competition in the market for thermal imaging equipment is significant. We believe that the principal competitive factors in our market are performance, cost, customer service, product reputation and effective marketing and sales efforts. Our competitors are different in each market segment. In the Thermography market, principal competitors include Raytheon Company, Raytek, NEC San-Ei, Nippon Avionics Co., Ltd, and Mikron Instruments. In the Imaging market, our competitors include BAE Systems, Wescam (a unit of L-3 Communications), DRS Corporation, Lockheed Martin Corporation, The Boeing Company, El-Op, Sagem and Thales. Many of these competitors have substantially greater financial, technical and marketing resources than we do.
Proprietary Rights
Our ability to compete successfully and achieve future revenue growth will depend in part on our ability to protect our proprietary technology and operate without infringing the rights of others. We rely on a combination of patent, trademark and trade secret laws, confidentiality agreements and contractual provisions to protect our proprietary rights. However, we believe that our historical success has been primarily a function of other
16
competitive advantages such as the skill and experience of our employees, our worldwide, multi-channel sales, distribution and servicing network and our name recognition and quality products. Because intellectual property protection does not necessarily represent a barrier to entry into the thermal imaging industry, we cannot be certain or give any assurance that we can maintain this competitive advantage or that competitors will not develop similar or superior capabilities.
Employees
As of December 31, 2003, we had 565 employees in the United States and 320 employees outside of the United States. We have been generally successful in attracting highly skilled technical, marketing and management personnel to date. None of our employees in the United States are represented by a union or other bargaining group. Employees in Sweden are represented by unions whose contracts are subject to periodic renegotiations. We believe our relationships with our employees and unions are good.
Available Information
Our internet website address is www.flir.com. Our Annual Report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 are available through our internet website as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file such material with, or furnish it to, the Securities and Exchange Commission. Our internet website and the information contained therein or connected thereto are not intended to be incorporated into this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
ITEM 2. | PROPERTIES |
We lease facilities under various operating leases that expire in 2004 through 2009. The leases call for fixed monthly payments over their term. The following summarizes our primary leased facilities:
Location |
Lease Expiration Date |
Square Feet | ||
FLIR Systems, Inc.Portland, Oregon |
2005 | 74,546 | ||
FLIR Systems ABDanderyd, Sweden |
2004 | 75,783 | ||
FLIR Systems ABDanderyd, Sweden |
2007 | 39,812 | ||
FLIR Systems, Inc.North Billerica, Massachusetts |
2005 | 102,000 | ||
FLIR Systems International Ltd.West Malling, United Kingdom |
2006 | 14,500 | ||
FLIR Systems Ltd.Toronto, Canada |
2005 | 4,161 | ||
FLIR Systems S.A.R.L.Paris, France |
2005 | 3,497 | ||
FLIR Systems GmbHFrankfurt, Germany |
2006 | 4,315 | ||
FLIR Systems s.r.l.Milan, Italy |
2009 | 4,305 | ||
FLIR Systems ABAntwerp, Belgium |
2006 | 4,164 | ||
FLIR Systems ABHong Kong |
2004 | 2,316 |
In December 2003, we purchased a building in North Billerica, Massachusetts to be used as the main production facility for our Boston operations. As part of the purchase agreement, the seller will assume the existing facility lease beginning in 2004 through the end of the lease agreement.
The Portland facility is used by the Imaging business and for our corporate headquarters. The facilities in France, Germany, Italy, Belgium and Hong Kong are sales and service locations for the Thermography business. All other facilities are used jointly by both the Thermography and Imaging businesses.
17
ITEM 3. | LEGAL PROCEEDINGS |
The Company is subject to legal proceedings, claims and litigation arising in the ordinary course of business. In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 5 Accounting for Contingencies, the Company makes a provision for a liability when it is both probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of loss can be reasonably estimated. The Company believes it has recorded adequate provisions for any probable and estimable losses. While the outcome of such matters is currently not determinable, the Company does not expect that the ultimate costs to resolve these matters will have a material adverse effect on the Companys financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
ITEM 4. | SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS |
No matters were submitted to a vote of security holders during the quarter ended December 31, 2003.
ITEM 5. | MARKET FOR REGISTRANTS COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS |
The common stock of FLIR Systems, Inc. has been traded on the Nasdaq National Market System since June 22, 1993, under the symbol FLIR. The following table sets forth, for the quarters indicated, the high and low closing sales price for the Companys common stock as reported on the Nasdaq National Market System.
2003 |
2002 | |||||||||||
High |
Low |
High |
Low | |||||||||
First Quarter |
$ | 25.71 | $ | 20.85 | $ | 29.32 | $ | 18.95 | ||||
Second Quarter |
31.43 | 23.61 | 25.79 | 19.00 | ||||||||
Third Quarter |
31.94 | 25.30 | 21.40 | 17.50 | ||||||||
Fourth Quarter |
36.66 | 25.70 | 24.49 | 14.11 |
On May 29, 2003, the Company effected a two-for-one split for each share of common stock outstanding on May 12, 2003. The Company issued approximately 17.5 million shares of common stock as a result of the stock split. The closing sales prices in the table above have been restated to reflect the stock split for all periods presented.
At December 31, 2003, there were approximately 159 holders of record of our common stock and 32,862,591 shares outstanding. We have never paid cash dividends on our common stock. We intend to retain earnings for use in our business and, therefore, do not anticipate paying cash dividends in the foreseeable future.
Information with respect to equity compensation plans is included under Equity Compensation Plan Information in the Companys definitive proxy statement for its 2004 Annual Meeting of Shareholders and is incorporated herein by reference.
18
ITEM 6. | SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA |
The following selected financial data should be read in conjunction with Item 7. Management Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.
Year Ended December 31, |
|||||||||||||||||
2003 |
2002 |
2001 |
2000(1) |
1999(2) |
|||||||||||||
(in thousands, except per share amounts) | |||||||||||||||||
Statement of Operations Data: |
|||||||||||||||||
Revenue |
$ | 311,979 | $ | 261,080 | $ | 214,373 | $ | 186,357 | $ | 178,556 | |||||||
Cost of goods sold |
146,454 | 124,060 | 97,541 | 104,116 | 123,228 | ||||||||||||
Gross profit |
165,525 | 137,020 | 116,832 | 82,241 | 55,328 | ||||||||||||
Operating expenses: |
|||||||||||||||||
Research and development |
30,665 | 26,892 | 27,235 | 29,150 | 29,443 | ||||||||||||
Selling, general and administrative |
65,034 | 59,597 | 51,861 | 63,916 | 62,899 | ||||||||||||
Combination costs |
| | | | 9,301 | ||||||||||||
Total operating expenses |
95,699 | 86,489 | 79,096 | 93,066 | 101,643 | ||||||||||||
Earnings (loss) from operations |
69,826 | 50,531 | 37,736 | (10,825 | ) | (46,315 | ) | ||||||||||
Interest expense and other expense, net |
5,978 | 1,638 | 8,993 | 11,504 | 5,771 | ||||||||||||
Earnings (loss) before income taxes |
63,848 | 48,893 | 28,743 | (22,329 | ) | (52,086 | ) | ||||||||||
Income tax provision |
19,155 | 7,334 | 2,809 | 3,725 | 2,295 | ||||||||||||
Net earnings (loss) |
$ | 44,693 | $ | 41,559 | $ | 25,934 | $ | (26,054 | ) | $ | (54,381 | ) | |||||
Net earnings (loss) per share(3): |
|||||||||||||||||
Basic |
$ | 1.32 | $ | 1.23 | $ | 0.86 | $ | (0.90 | ) | $ | (1.91 | ) | |||||
Diluted |
$ | 1.27 | $ | 1.17 | $ | 0.81 | $ | (0.90 | ) | $ | (1.91 | ) | |||||
Balance Sheet Data: |
|||||||||||||||||
Working capital |
$ | 311,776 | $ | 121,479 | $ | 69,440 | $ | 68,419 | $ | 4,481 | |||||||
Total assets |
450,423 | 233,822 | 185,038 | 166,991 | 196,487 | ||||||||||||
Short-term debt |
| | 23,954 | 18,819 | 82,331 | ||||||||||||
Long-term debt, excluding current portion |
204,369 | | | 75,485 | 1,497 | ||||||||||||
Total shareholders equity |
164,842 | 172,327 | 104,848 | 29,025 | 56,219 |
(1) | During 2000, we recorded one-time pre-tax charges of $20.5 million primarily related to streamlining our manufacturing and corporate operations. The charges include $9.0 million related to eliminating older or lower margin products, $8.8 million related to cost accumulations and asset valuations that have been written off as a result of these operational changes and $2.2 million for workforce reductions and related costs. We also recorded a charge of $0.5 million related to the settlement of the class action lawsuit. These charges are reflected in cost of goods sold for $13.3 million, operating expenses for $7.0 million, and other expenses of $0.2 million. |
(2) | In connection with the merger with Inframetrics, Inc., which was effective on March 30, 1999, we recorded one-time pre-tax charges of $34.6 million. The charges consisted of $25.3 million of inventories, which is included in cost of goods sold, due to the elimination of duplicative product lines, and $9.3 million of transaction related costs, which are reported as combination costs. This merger was accounted for as a pooling of interests. |
(3) | On May 29, 2003, the Company effected a two-for-one split for each share of common stock outstanding on May 12, 2003. The Company issued approximately 17.5 million shares of common stock as a result of the stock split. The Companys per share amounts have been restated to reflect the stock split for all periods presented. |
19
ITEM 7. | MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS |
Overview
FLIR was founded in 1978, originally providing infrared imaging systems that were installed on vehicles for use in conducting energy audits of neighborhoods by helping to determine whether there was any abnormal leakage of heat coming from the doors, windows, walls and roofs of each house. As demand for that application declined, the Company began to focus on other applications and markets for its technology, in particular, designing and selling stabilized thermal imaging systems for aircraft used by law enforcement. Since then, the Company has continued to develop thermal imaging products for a growing number of applications and has now become one of the world leaders in the design, manufacture and marketing of thermal imaging and stabilized camera systems for a wide variety of applications in the commercial, industrial and government markets, internationally as well as domestically. Our business is now organized around two principal business segments, Thermography and Imaging.
The Thermography market primarily consists of the use of hand-held thermal imaging systems that can detect and measure minute temperature differences, which is useful for a wide variety of industrial and commercial applications. Uses for our Thermography products include predictive and preventative maintenance, process control, condition monitoring, moisture detection and scientific analysis. In 2002, we introduced a new inexpensive camera, known as the E-Series, that has increased the number of markets and applications that Thermography serves. Our Thermography products are produced at our facility in Sweden. A growing distribution network has enabled us to penetrate existing and developing markets and applications worldwide.
Our Imaging business offers a wide array of products, all of which allow the user to see in total darkness, and through many types of obscurants, such as smoke, haze and most types of fog. Product offerings include hand-held and fixed-mounted products for ground, airborne and maritime applications. Applications for our Imaging products include force protection, counter terrorism, search and rescue, perimeter security, navigation safety, law enforcement, narcotics detection, maritime and border patrol, electronic news gathering, anti-piracy and firefighting. Our Imaging products are primarily produced at our Portland, Boston and Sweden facilities. A substantial portion of our revenue in the Imaging business is derived from sales to government agencies and we are continuing to expand our military program business, both in the United States and internationally.
We continue to enhance our state-of-the-art products within both business segments, as well as develop products for new market applications that use advanced thermal imaging technologies. For example, uncooled detector technology used in our Thermography systems enable these systems to operate at room temperature, allowing for systems that are less expensive, smaller, lighter, and more energy efficient. For our Imaging products, we are continually improving the performance of our systems by utilizing our skills in system design, systems integration, and improving component performance, while also improving the stabilization of our airborne systems and offering additional imaging options, such as CCD TV cameras, laser rangefinders and laser designators.
On October 22, 2003, we announced the acquisition of Indigo Systems Corporation which is located in Goleta (Santa Barbara), California. Indigo is a leading producer of infrared detectors, infrared cameras, and camera subsystems. The acquisition of Indigo provides us with the ability to design and produce infrared detectors, both cooled and uncooled, for both our Imaging and Thermography business. Indigo will also allow us to expand our presence in certain markets, including high-end scientific cameras, OEMs and certain military program markets.
International revenue accounted for approximately 43.2%, 44.0% and 47.0% of our revenue in 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively. We anticipate that international sales will continue to account for a significant percentage of revenue. With the production and distribution of our Thermography products in Sweden contributing a large volume of sales denominated in foreign currencies, we have exposure to foreign exchange fluctuations and changing dynamics of foreign competitiveness based on variations in the value of the US dollar relative to other
20
currencies. During 2003, there were significant fluctuations in the values of the major currencies in which we conduct business, in particular, a weakening of the US dollar. The impact of those fluctuations is reflected throughout our consolidated financial statements, but in aggregate, did not have a material impact on our results of operations.
The Company typically experiences longer payment cycles on its international sales, which can have an adverse impact upon the Companys liquidity. In addition, substantial portions of the Companys operations are conducted outside the United States, including manufacturing in Sweden and sales operations worldwide. International sales and operations may be subject to risks such as the imposition of governmental controls, export license requirements, restrictions on the export of critical technology, political and economic instability, trade restrictions, labor union activities, changes in tariffs and taxes, difficulties in staffing and managing international operations, and general economic conditions.
The Company experiences fluctuations in orders and sales due to seasonal variations and customer sales cycles, such as the seasonal pattern of contracting by the US and certain foreign governments, the frequent requirement by international customers to take delivery of equipment prior to the end of December due to funding considerations, and the tendency of commercial enterprises to fully utilize annual capital budgets prior to expiration. Such events have resulted and could continue to result in certain fluctuations in quarterly results in the future. As a result of such quarterly fluctuations in operating results, the Company believes that quarter-to-quarter comparisons of its results of operations are not necessarily meaningful and should not be relied upon as indicators of future performance.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
This discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based upon our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. On an on-going basis, we evaluate our estimates, including those related to revenue recognition, bad debts, inventories, investments, goodwill impairment, warranty obligations, contingencies and income taxes. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying value of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. Senior management has discussed the development, selection and disclosure of these estimates with the Audit Committee of the Companys Board of Directors. We believe the following critical accounting policies and the related judgments and estimates affect the preparation of our consolidated financial statements.
Revenue recognition. Our policy is to recognize revenue upon delivery of the product to the customer at a fixed or determinable price and with a reasonable assurance of collection, passage of title to the customer as indicated by the shipping terms and fulfillment of all significant obligations, pursuant to guidance provided by Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 104, Revenue Recognition (SAB 104), issued by the Securities and Exchange Commission in December 2003. SAB 104 clarified existing guidance, principally those provided by SAB 101, Revenue Recognition in Financial Statements, regarding revenues for contracts that contain multiple elements.
We design, market and sell our products as commercial, off-the-shelf products. Many of our Imaging customers, particularly those who use our airborne systems, request different system configurations, based on standard options or accessories that we offer. In general, our revenue arrangements do not involve acceptance provisions based upon customer specified acceptance criteria. In those limited circumstances when customer specified acceptance criteria exist, revenue is deferred until customer acceptance if we cannot demonstrate the system meets those specifications prior to shipment. For any contracts with multiple elements (i.e., training, installation, additional parts), we recognize revenue only after we have determined that elements with stand alone
21
values have been delivered and any undelivered elements have objective and reliable evidence of fair value. Judgments are required in evaluating the credit worthiness of our customers. Credit is not extended to customers and revenue is not recognized until we have determined that the risk of uncollectibility is minimal.
Allowance for doubtful accounts. Our policy is to maintain allowances for estimated losses resulting from the inability of our customers to make required payments. Credit limits are established through a process of reviewing the financial history and stability of each customer. Where appropriate, we obtain credit rating reports and financial statements of the customer when determining or modifying their credit limits. We regularly evaluate the collectibility of our trade receivable balances based on a combination of factors. When a customers account balance becomes past due, we initiate dialogue with the customer to determine the cause. If it is determined that the customer will be unable to meet its financial obligation to us, such as in the case of a bankruptcy filing, deterioration in the customers operating results or financial position or other material events impacting their business, we record a specific allowance to reduce the related receivable to the amount we expect to recover given all information presently available.
We also record an allowance for all other customers based on certain other factors including the length of time the receivables are past due and historical collection experience with individual customers. As of December 31, 2003, our accounts receivable balance of $79.3 million is reported net of allowances for doubtful accounts of $1.3 million. We believe our reported allowances at December 31, 2003, are adequate. If the financial conditions of those customers were to deteriorate, however, resulting in their inability to make payments, we may need to record additional allowances that would result in additional selling, general and administrative expenses being recorded for the period in which such determination is made.
Inventory write downs. As a designer and manufacturer of high technology infrared systems, we are exposed to a number of economic and industry factors that could result in portions of our inventories becoming either obsolete or in excess of anticipated usage. These factors include, but are not limited to, technological changes in our markets, our ability to meet changing customer requirements, competitive pressures in products and prices, and the availability of key components from our suppliers. Our policy is to establish inventory write downs when conditions exist that suggest that our inventories may be in excess of anticipated demand or are obsolete based upon our assumptions about future demand for our products and market conditions. We regularly evaluate the ability to realize the value of our inventories based on a combination of factors including the following: historical usage rates, forecasted sales or usage, product end of life dates, estimated current and future market values and new product introductions. Purchasing requirements and alternative usage avenues are explored within these processes to mitigate inventory exposure. When recorded, our write downs are intended to reduce the carrying value of our inventories to their net realizable value. As of December 31, 2003, our inventories of $76.0 million are stated net of inventory write downs of $11.9 million. If actual demand for our products deteriorates or market conditions are less favorable than those that we project, additional inventory write downs may be required.
Cost-basis Investments. FLIR has invested in two third-party entities. The investments are accounted for on a cost basis since we do not have controlling interests in these entities nor do have we the ability to exercise significant influence on them. As of December 31, 2003, we have carrying values of these investments, including debt, of approximately $1.4 million. We periodically review the investments for impairment to determine if events or changes in the business conditions of those entities indicate the carrying value of our investments may not be recoverable. These reviews may be based upon factors that include, but are not limited to, hypothetical liquidations of the investees at book value and current or recent financings received by the investees. If future changes in business results or market conditions indicate that any impairment, other than temporary, exists on these investments, we may need to record reserves against those investments.
Goodwill impairment. The Company recorded goodwill in connection with our acquisition of AGEMA Infrared Systems AB in 1997. During the year ended December 31, 2002, we adopted the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets (SFAS 142). SFAS 142 changed the accounting for goodwill from an amortization method to an impairment-only approach.
22
We review goodwill in June of each year for impairment to determine if events or changes in business conditions indicate that the carrying value of the asset may not be recoverable. Such reviews assess the fair value of the assets based upon our estimates of the future cash flows we expect the assets to generate within the boundary of the overall market capitalization of the Company. Our current review indicates that no adjustments are necessary for the goodwill asset, which has a carrying value of $12.5 million as of December 31, 2003. In response to changes in industry and market conditions, we may be required to strategically realign our resources in the future which could result in an impairment of goodwill.
Product warranties. Our products are sold with warranty provisions that require us to remedy deficiencies in quality or performance of our products over a specified period of time, generally twelve months, at no cost to our customers. Our policy is to establish warranty reserves at levels that represent our estimate of the costs that will be incurred to fulfill those warranty requirements at the time that revenue is recognized. We believe that our recorded liability of $3.5 million at December 31, 2003, is adequate to cover our future cost of materials, labor and overhead for the servicing of our products sold through that date. If actual product failures or material or service delivery costs differ from our estimates, our warranty liability would need to be revised accordingly.
Contingencies. We are subject to the possibility of loss contingencies arising in the normal course of business. We consider the likelihood of loss or impairment of an asset or the incurrence of a liability, as well as our ability to reasonably estimate the amount of loss in determining loss contingencies. An estimated loss is accrued when it is probable that an asset has been impaired or a liability has been incurred and the amount can be reasonably estimated. We regularly evaluate current information available to us to determine whether such accruals should be adjusted.
Income taxes. We record our deferred tax assets at an amount that we determine is more likely than not to be realized in the future. Valuation allowances against deferred tax assets are recorded when a determination is made that the deferred tax assets are not likely to be realized in the future. In making that determination, we estimate our future taxable income based upon historical operating results and external market data. Future levels of taxable income are dependent upon, but not limited to, general economic conditions, competitive pressures, and other factors beyond our control. As of December 31, 2003, we have determined that no valuation allowance against our deferred tax assets of $30.0 million is required. If we should determine that we may be unable to realize our deferred tax assets to the extent reported, an adjustment to the deferred tax assets would be charged to income in the period such determination is made.
Results of Operations
The following table sets forth for the indicated periods certain items as a percentage of revenue.
Year Ended December 31, |
|||||||||
2003 |
2002 |
2001 |
|||||||
Revenue |
100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | |||
Cost of goods sold |
46.9 | 47.5 | 45.5 | ||||||
Gross profit |
53.1 | 52.5 | 54.5 | ||||||
Operating expenses: |
|||||||||
Research and development |
9.8 | 10.3 | 12.7 | ||||||
Selling, general and administrative |
20.8 | 22.8 | 24.2 | ||||||
Total operating expenses |
30.6 | 33.1 | 36.9 | ||||||
Earnings from operations |
22.5 | 19.4 | 17.6 | ||||||
Interest expense |
1.6 | 0.8 | 4.6 | ||||||
Interest income |
(0.8 | ) | (0.2 | ) | (0.2 | ) | |||
Other expense (income), net |
1.2 | 0.1 | (0.2 | ) | |||||
Earnings before income taxes |
20.5 | 18.7 | 13.4 | ||||||
Income tax provision |
6.2 | 2.8 | 1.3 | ||||||
Net earnings |
14.3 | % | 15.9 | % | 12.1 | % | |||
23
Years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001
Revenue. Revenue for 2003 totaled $312.0 million, an increase of 19.5% over the $261.1 million in revenue reported in 2002. Revenue from the Imaging business segment increased 15.5% from $167.2 million in 2002 to $193.1 million in 2003. Revenue from the Thermography business segment increased 26.7% from $93.8 million in 2002 to $118.8 million in 2003. The increase in Imaging revenue was primarily due to an increase in unit volumes, particularly in our maritime products, and a shift in the mix of shipments of our ground-based, law enforcement and broadcast products to higher priced systems. The Thermography revenue increase was primarily due to an increase in unit volumes, particularly the E-Series products and in the predictive maintenance market segments. The unit increases are due to increases in capital spending as worldwide economies have improved and also due to penetration into new markets and the identification of additional applications. Approximately one-fifth of the increase in total revenue, as well as the increase in both segments, was due to fluctuations in currency exchange rates during 2003.
Revenue for 2002 totaled $261.1 million, an increase of 21.8% over the $214.4 million in revenue reported in 2001. Revenue from the Imaging business segment increased 36.1% from $122.9 million in 2001 to $167.2 million in 2002, while the Thermography business segment reported a revenue increase of 2.6% from $91.5 million in 2001 to $93.8 million in 2002. The increase in Imaging revenue was primarily due to an increase in unit volumes, particularly in our ground-based products, and the mix of shipments within our airborne product offerings. The Thermography revenue increase was due to greater unit volume shipments, primarily due to the market acceptance of our new E-Series products, offset by the lower prices associated with the E-Series products and reductions in capital spending by our customer base which impacted our higher priced Thermography products.
International revenue in 2003 totaled $134.9 million, representing 43.2% of revenue. This compares to international revenue in 2002 which totaled $114.8 million, representing 44.0% of revenue, and $100.7 million, or 47.0% of revenue in 2001. While the sales mix between domestic and international sales may fluctuate slightly from year to year, we anticipate the mix to be approximately 55% domestic and 45% international on a long-term basis.
Gross profit. Gross profit in 2003 was 53.1% of revenue, compared to 52.5% in 2002. The increase in gross profit percentage was primarily due to the increase in the Thermography business over the Imaging business as a percentage of revenue. In 2003, the Thermography revenue was 38.1% of total revenue, compared to 35.9% of total revenue in 2002. We historically experience higher gross margins in our Thermography business than in our Imaging business. The increased use of distributors, whose commissions are reported as a reduction of revenue, in the Thermography business has partially offset the increase in gross profit percentage attributable to the change in the mix between the business segments.
As a percentage of revenue, gross profit in 2002 was 52.5% compared to 54.5% in 2001. The decrease in gross profit percentage was primarily due to the change in relative mix of revenue from our business segments. In 2002, Imaging revenue represented 64.1% of our total revenue compared to 57.3% of total revenue in 2001.
Research and development. Research and development expenses were $30.7 million, or 9.8% of revenue, in 2003 compared to $26.9 million, or 10.3% of revenue, in 2002. We believe that spending levels are sufficient to support the development of new products and the continued growth of the business. We expect research and development expenses to represent 8% to 10% of our revenue on a long-term basis.
Research and development expenses were $26.9 million during 2002 compared to $27.2 million in 2001. As a percentage of revenue, research and development expenses decreased from 12.7% in 2001 to 10.3% in 2002.
Selling, general and administrative expenses. Selling, general and administrative expenses were $65.0 million, or 20.8% of revenue in 2003 compared to $59.6 million, or 22.8% of revenue in 2002. The decrease in
24
expenses as a percentage of revenue was a result of the revenue increase during the year and the ability to manage spending growth at a lower level than the revenue growth. We anticipate selling, general and administrative expenses in the future to increase at a slower rate than revenue.
Selling, general and administrative expenses increased from $51.9 million, or 24.2% of revenue, in 2001 to $59.6 million, or 22.8% of revenue, in 2002. The increase in spending was primarily due to the increase in selling and marketing expenses arising from the general business and revenue growth during 2002, partially offset by a reduction of $1.1 million in expenses from 2001 to 2002 related to the discontinuance of the amortization of goodwill in 2002.
Interest expense. Interest expense totaled $4.9 million, $2.0 million and $9.8 million for the years ended 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively. The increase in interest from 2002 to 2003 is primarily due to the accrual of a partial year of interest on the convertible notes that were issued in June 2003. The decrease in interest from 2001 to 2002 was due primarily to the reduction in debt as the Company was able to use cash from operations and the proceeds from its December 2001 follow-on common stock offering to repay its outstanding debt. The Companys outstanding indebtedness under its primary credit agreement declined from $89.9 million at the beginning of 2001 to $19.9 million at the end of 2001 and was paid in full in February 2002. Interest expense for 2002 and 2001 also includes expenses associated with the Companys interest rate swap agreements in the amounts of $1.0 million and $2.2 million, respectively. The swap agreements were settled during 2002.
Interest income. Interest income was $2.4 million, $0.5 million and $0.4 million for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002, and 2001, respectively. The increase in interest income in 2003 was due to the invested cash for the second half of the year as a result of the June issuance of the convertible notes.
Other expense (income). The Company reported other expenses of $3.6 million for 2003, other expenses of $0.1 million for 2002 and other income of $0.4 million in 2001. The significant increase in other expense in 2003 was due to currency losses on transactions denominated in currencies in other than the functional currency of the Companys European operations as the European currencies strengthened significantly against the US dollar during 2003.
Income taxes. The Companys income tax provision was $19.2 million, $7.3 million and $2.8 million in 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively. The effective tax rates for 2003, 2002 and 2001 were 30.0%, 15.0% and 9.8%, respectively. The mix in taxable income between the Companys US and foreign operations impacted the income tax provisions in each of these years, but changes in the Companys valuation allowance on its deferred tax assets in 2002 and 2001 related to our assessment of the ability to realize the deferred tax assets generated by prior tax loss benefits had the result of keeping the effective tax rates in those years lower.
At December 31, 2003, the Company had US tax net operating loss carryforwards (NOLs) totaling $54.7 million which expire in the years 2019 through 2021. Additionally, the Company has various US tax credits available aggregating $6.4 million, which expire in the years 2007 through 2022. The Company has generated deductions for US tax purposes related to the exercise of stock options that have served to offset the reductions in its NOLs. The utilization of these stock option exercise deductions is accounted for as a direct increase in additional paid-in capital rather than as a reduction in the Companys tax provision.
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 109 Accounting for Income Taxes requires that the tax benefits described above be recorded as assets to the extent that management assesses the utilization of such assets to be more likely than not; otherwise, a valuation allowance is required to be recorded. Based on this guidance, management believes that the deferred tax assets of $30.0 million reflected on the December 31, 2003 consolidated balance sheet, is realizable based on future forecasts of taxable income over a relatively short time horizon and has not recorded a valuation allowance.
Future levels of taxable income are dependent upon general economic conditions, including but not limited to continued growth of the Thermography and Imaging markets, competitive pressures on sales and gross
25
margins, successful implementation of tax planning strategies, and other factors beyond the Companys control. No assurance can be given that sufficient taxable income will be generated for full utilization of the deferred tax assets. Accordingly, the Company may be required to record a valuation allowance against the deferred tax assets in future periods if its future forecasts of taxable income are not achieved.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
At December 31, 2003, the Company had $198.0 million in cash and cash equivalents compared to $46.6 million at December 31, 2002. The increase in cash and cash equivalents is primarily from the proceeds from the issuance of convertible notes in June 2003 and cash provided from operations, less the cash used for capital expenditures and to repurchase shares of the Companys common stock.
Cash provided by operating activities in 2003 totaled $27.2 million compared to $55.0 million in 2002. The decrease in cash provided from operating activities was primarily due to an increase in accounts receivable and inventories during 2003.
At December 31, 2003, the Company had accounts receivable in the amount of $79.3 million compared to $55.8 million at December 31, 2002. The increase of $23.5 million in the receivable balance is primarily due to an increase in revenue in the fourth quarter of 2003 compared to the fourth quarter of 2002. Approximately $5.0 million of the increase in receivables is attributable to the change in currency rates from the end of 2002.
At December 31, 2003, the Company had inventories of $76.0 million compared to $50.1 million at December 31, 2003. The increase in inventories is primarily due to the general growth of the business and the anticipation of production demands as evidenced by the December 31, 2003 order backlog of $146 million. The increase in work-in-progress inventories accounts for 50.3% of the total increase in inventories. Additionally, approximately $5.9 million of the total increase in inventories relates to the change in currency rates during the year.
At December 31, 2003, the Company had prepaid expenses and other current assets of $20.0 million compared to $12.7 million at December 31, 2002. The increase was primarily due to a net increase in the number of demonstration units and an increase in supplier advances.
The Companys investing activities for the year ended December 31, 2003 totaled $18.3 million. Capital expenditures during 2003 include the purchase of a new building for the Boston operations for $10.6 million. Investing activities for the year ended December 31, 2002 totaled $7.1 million, consisting primarily of expenditures for fixed assets, including the relocation of certain of the Companys operations in 2002.
At December 31, 2003, the Company had other long-term assets of $7.9 million compared to $4.4 million at December 31, 2002. The increase primarily relates to insurance investment contracts purchased during the year and a long-term portion of a customer receivable.
Accounts payable increased from $16.5 million at December 31, 2002 to $26.4 million at December 31, 2003. The increase relates to the increase in inventories and the general growth of the Companys business.
Other current liabilities at December 31, 2003 were $8.2 million, an increase of $1.9 million from the end of 2002. The increase was related to an increase in commissions payable to sales representatives and the accrual of interest on the convertible debt.
Pension and other long-term liabilities increased $2.0 million, from $8.9 million at December 31, 2002 to $10.9 million at December 31, 2003. The increase is primarily due to the increase in accrued expenses associated with the Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan.
26
The Company maintains a Credit Agreement with Bank of America, N.A., KeyBank, N.A., and Union Bank of California, N.A. The agreement, dated March 22, 2002 and amended June 5, 2003, provides for a $35 million, three-year revolving line of credit with an option for an additional $25 million until September 27, 2004. Under the Credit Agreement, borrowings will bear interest based upon the prime lending rate of the Bank of America or Eurodollar rates with a provision for a spread over such rates based upon the Companys leverage ratio. At December 31, 2003, the interest rate ranged from 2.60% to 4.00%. The Credit Agreement contains five financial covenants that require the maintenance of certain fixed charge and leverage ratios in addition to minimum levels of EBITDA and consolidated net worth and a maximum level of capital expenditures. The Credit Agreement is collateralized by substantially all assets of the Company. At December 31, 2003, the Company had no amounts outstanding under the Credit Agreement and was in compliance with all covenants.
The Company, through two of its subsidiaries, has a 50 million Swedish Kroner (approximately $6.8 million) line of credit at 3.7% and a $2 million line of credit at 5.25% at December 31, 2003. At December 31, 2003, the Company had no amounts outstanding on these lines. The 50 million Swedish Kroner line of credit is secured primarily by accounts receivable and inventories of the applicable subsidiary and is subject to automatic renewal on an annual basis. On July 10, 2003, the 50 million Swedish Kroner credit agreement replaced the old agreement of 60 million Swedish Kroner with the same terms. The $2 million line of credit is secured by substantially all assets of the applicable subsidiary and is subject to renegotiation annually.
In June 2003, the Company issued $210 million of 3.0% senior convertible notes due 2023 in a private offering pursuant to Rule 144A under the Securities Act of 1933. The issuance was made through an initial offering of $175 million made on June 11, 2003, and the subsequent exercise in full by the underwriters of their option to purchase an additional $35 million on June 17, 2003. The net proceeds from the issuance were approximately $203.9 million. Issuance costs are being amortized over a period of seven years. Interest is payable semiannually on June 1 and December 1 of each year beginning on December 1, 2003. The holders of the notes may convert all or some of their notes into shares of the Companys common stock at a conversion rate of 22.5306 shares per $1,000 principal amount of notes, subject to adjustments, prior to the maturity date in certain circumstances. These circumstances generally include (a) the market price of the Companys common stock exceeding 130% of the conversion price, (b) the Company calling the notes for redemption, (c) the occurrence of specified corporate transactions, or (d) if the notes become rated and such rating is lowered by two or more rating levels. The Company may redeem for cash all or part of the notes on or after June 8, 2010. Note holders have the right to require the Company to purchase their notes on or after June 1, 2010. The proceeds are being used for general corporate purposes, which include the acquisition of Indigo Systems Corporation and other working capital and capital expenditure needs.
During the year ended December 31, 2003, the Company used $75.5 million in cash to purchase 2.7 million shares of the Companys common stock.
On October 21, 2003, the Company and Indigo Systems Corporation (Indigo) entered into a Definitive Agreement and Plan of Merger pursuant to which the Company will acquire Indigo. Indigo security holders will receive cash consideration of approximately $165 million, and all outstanding Indigo stock options will be converted into options to purchase FLIR stock. The transaction is valued, excluding acquisition related costs, at approximately $190 million and was closed on January 6, 2004.
While the successful completion of the Indigo transaction consumed a significant portion of our cash as of December 31, 2003, we believe that our existing cash combined with the cash we anticipate to generate from operating activities, and our available credit facilities and financing available from other sources will be sufficient to meet our cash requirements for the foreseeable future. Except as described above, we do not have any significant capital commitments for the coming year.
27
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
As of December 31, 2003, we leased our non-owned facilities under operating lease agreements. We also leased certain operating machinery and equipment and office equipment under operating lease agreements. Except for these operating lease agreements, we do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are likely to have a material current or future effect on our financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources.
Contractual Obligations
As of December 31, 2003, the Companys contractual obligations were as follows (in thousands):
Payments Due by Period | |||||||||||||||
Contractual Obligations |
Total |
Less than 1 Year |
1 3 Years |
3 5 Years |
More than 5 Years | ||||||||||
Long-term debt |
$ | 210,000 | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | 210,000 | |||||
Operating leases |
11,993 | 5,121 | 5,068 | 1,747 | 57 | ||||||||||
Purchase obligations |
12,374 | 10,551 | 1,823 | | | ||||||||||
$ | 234,367 | $ | 15,672 | $ | 6,891 | $ | 1,747 | $ | 210,057 | ||||||
Risk Factors
In addition to the factors discussed in the Forward-Looking Statements section provided at the beginning of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, the following are important factors that could cause actual results or events to differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking statements made by or on behalf of the Company. In addition, you should know that the risks and uncertainties described below are not the only ones we face. Unforeseen risks could arise and problems or issues that we now view as minor could become more significant. If we were unable to adequately respond to any risks, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially adversely affected. Additionally, we cannot be certain or give any assurances that any actions taken to reduce known risks and uncertainties will work.
Fluctuations in our quarterly and annual operating results make it difficult to predict our future performance.
Our quarterly and annual operating results are likely to fluctuate in the future due to a variety of factors, some of which are beyond our control. Due to fluctuations in our quarterly operating results, we believe that quarter-to-quarter comparisons of our operating results are not necessarily meaningful and should not be relied upon as indicators of future performance. Factors that may affect our future operating results include:
| the timing, number and size of orders from, and shipments to, our customers, as well as the relative mix of those orders; |
| variations in the volume of orders for a particular product or product line in a particular quarter, which can be substantial, may result in variations in revenue and gross margins; |
| a significant portion of our sales are made in the last month of each quarter, with sales frequently concentrated in the last week or days of the quarter; |
| the timing and market acceptance of our or our competitors new products, product enhancements or technologies; |
| our ability to obtain sufficient supplies of critical components; |
| the timing of the release of government funds for procurement of our products; |
| changes in our or our competitors pricing policies; |
28
| the timing and amount of any inventory write-downs; |
| foreign currency fluctuations; |
| costs and risks associated with the acquisition and integration of other businesses, product lines or technologies; and |
| general economic conditions, both domestically and internationally. |
Seasonal fluctuations in our operating results, particularly the increase in sales we generally experience every year in the fourth quarter, result from:
| the seasonal pattern of contracting by the United States and certain foreign governments; |
| the frequent requirement of international customers to take delivery of equipment prior to January due to funding considerations; and |
| the tendency of commercial enterprises to fully utilize annual capital budgets prior to expiration. |
We have had difficulties managing our growth.
Our operations have become global, and our revenue has grown from $177 million in the year ended December 31, 1998 to $312 million in the year ended December 31, 2003. In the past, we experienced problems in developing and implementing a financial reporting and controls system commensurate with the substantial growth and increased complexity of our business. We have taken a number of steps to improve our controls and systems. However, if these and other measures we take are inadequate to address the growth we continue to experience, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected.
We may be unable to successfully integrate Indigo Systems, or any future acquisition or equity investment, into our operations, thereby disrupting our business and harming our financial condition and results of operations.
In January 2004, we completed the acquisition of Indigo Systems Corporation, which is located in Goleta (Santa Barbara), California. We intend to integrate Indigos cooled and uncooled infrared detectors into our Thermography and Imaging products, thereby lowering our product costs, and begin selling some of Indigos infrared camera cores and camera systems. This integration of businesses, personnel, product lines and technologies is typically difficult, time consuming and subject to a number of risks. For example, the integration of Indigo infrared detectors into our existing products requires extensive engineering and manufacturing effort that may take longer than anticipated or may not be successful. Further, the integration of products and product lines requires the coordination of research and development, manufacturing, sales, marketing and service efforts between the Company and Indigo or any future acquisitions. Because the Indigo acquisition occurred so recently, we have had limited experience managing their operations. Additionally, we could lose the key personnel from Indigo or any future companies that we acquire, incur unanticipated costs and assume new liabilities. Any of these difficulties could disrupt our ongoing business, distract our management and employees, increase our expenses and decrease our revenue. Furthermore, we might have to incur additional debt or issue additional equity securities to pay for any future acquisitions. The issuance of any additional equity securities could dilute our then existing shareholders ownership. While there are currently no such acquisitions planned or being negotiated, we frequently evaluate strategic opportunities available to us and may in the near or long term pursue acquisitions of complementary businesses, product lines or technologies. As a result, no assurance can be given that we will realize the anticipated benefits of our acquisition of Indigo, or any future acquisition or equity investment, or that any such acquisition or investment will not have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We are under a Cease and Desist Order from the SEC, a violation of which could harm our business.
On June 8, 2000, the SEC issued a formal order of investigation of us and certain officers, directors, employees and other individuals presently and formerly associated with us to determine whether any violations
29
of the federal securities laws occurred during 1998 and 1999. The investigation relates to our revenue recognition policies, accounting controls, financial reports and other public disclosures during that time period.
Pursuant to an offer of settlement submitted by us on September 30, 2002, the SEC instituted and simultaneously settled a proceeding against us under Section 8A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the Securities Act) and Section 21C of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act). Without admitting or denying the allegations of the SECs order, we agreed to the entry of an order requiring that we cease and desist from committing or causing any violations and any future violations of the antifraud provisions of the Securities Act and the antifraud, periodic reporting, record keeping and internal control provisions of the federal securities laws set forth in Section 17(a) of the Securities Act and Sections 10(b), 13(a), 13(b)(2)(A) and 13(b)(2)(B) of the Exchange Act and Rules 10b-5, 12b-20, 13a-1 and 13a-13 thereunder. We incurred no financial fine or penalty under the terms of settlement.
The SECs order stated that we materially overstated our earnings before income taxes for each of the quarters of 1998 and 1999 as well as for fiscal year 1998, and that our revenue recognition practices resulted in material misstatements and omissions in the financial statements contained in our Annual Report on Form 10-K as originally filed for the year ended December 31, 1998 and our Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q as originally filed for each of the first three quarters of both 1998 and 1999. In 2000 and 2001, we restated our financial statements for 1998 and 1999. No further restatements of our financial statements were required by the order, and the entry of the order did not have a material adverse impact on our financial condition or results of operations. Should we be found to have violated the terms of the SECs order in the future, we may be subject to further enforcement action, including legal action imposing injunctive relief and assessing fines or penalties, which could have a material impact on our business.
A reduction in government purchasing or our inability to act as a United States Government contractor could significantly decrease revenue.
The government procurement process is complex and highly competitive. A substantial portion of our revenue is derived from sales to United States and foreign government agencies, and our business will continue to be substantially dependent upon such sales. No sales to a single agency of the United States Government accounted for more than 10% of our revenue last year, but aggregate sales to United States Government agencies accounted for 25% and 26% of our revenue for the years ended December 31, 2002 and 2003, respectively. However, no one agency accounted for more than 10% of total sales in either period. Accordingly, our results of operations would be adversely impacted by governmental spending cuts and general budgetary constraints. Further, because most of our government sales are not made for defense applications, if the United States Government reduces its non-military spending as a result of increases in military spending due to instability in Iraq and elsewhere, or other developments, our revenues could be adversely affected. Conversely, a significant reduction in purchases of thermal imaging systems for defense applications could result in certain of our competitors committing more attention and resources to non-defense applications, thereby increasing competitive pressures in our primary markets. In addition, we are seeking to secure additional government contracts for the design and long-term supply of commercially developed military qualified thermal imaging devices. If we are not successful in winning such contracts, or do not perform our obligations on any such contracts we do secure, our future operating results may be adversely affected. Our ability to do business with the United States Government is conditioned upon our continuing eligibility to act as a federal contractor. A significant decline in our sales to United States or foreign governments or our disqualification from making such sales for any reason would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Our future success will depend on our ability to respond to the rapid technological change in the markets in which we compete.
The market for thermal imaging equipment is characterized by rapid technological developments and frequent new product introductions, enhancements and modifications. Our success will depend in large part on
30
our ability to develop new technologies that anticipate changing customer requirements. We may need to make substantial capital expenditures and incur significant research and development costs to develop and introduce new products and enhancements. If we fail to develop and introduce new technologies in a timely manner, our business, financial condition and results of operations would be adversely affected. From time to time, we or our competitors may announce new products, product enhancements or technological innovations that have the potential to replace or shorten the life cycles of our products and that may cause customers to defer purchasing our existing products, resulting in inventory obsolescence.
We must successfully introduce new or enhanced products and manage the costs associated with producing numerous product lines to be successful.
Our future success depends on our ability to continue to improve our existing products and to develop new products using the latest technology that can satisfy customer requirements. For example, our near-term success will depend on the continued acceptance of the Star SAFIRE Imaging product line and the ThermaCam® P-Series and E-Series Thermography product lines, sales of which we expect to generate a substantial amount of our revenue. We are also investing a significant amount of our financial resources in the enhancement of some of our other existing products. We cannot be certain that we will successfully complete these enhancements within the necessary time period or that customers will accept our new products, or any future products. In addition, the complexity associated with the production of multiple product lines may inhibit our ability to maintain or improve our gross margins. Our failure to complete the enhancement of these products, the failure of our current or future products to gain or maintain market acceptance or our failure to successfully manage our cost of production could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Competition in the markets for thermal imaging equipment is intense and our failure to compete effectively would adversely affect our business.
Competition in the markets for our products is intense. The speed with which companies can identify new applications for thermal imaging, develop products to meet those needs and supply commercial quantities at low prices to the market are important competitive factors. We believe the principal competitive factors in our markets are product features, reliability and price. Additionally, our products compete indirectly with numerous other products, such as image intensifiers and low-light cameras, for limited governmental and military funds. Finally, many of our competitors have greater financial, technical, research and development and marketing resources than we do. All of these factors result in greater challenges from our existing competitors as well as increasing competition from new competitors and require us to continue to invest in, and focus on, research and development and new product innovation. No assurance can be given that we will be able to compete effectively in the future, which would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Dependence on sole source and limited source suppliers of components for our products and our transition to manufacturing our own cooled and uncooled infrared detectors exposes us to risks that could result in delays in satisfying customer demand, increased costs and loss of revenue.
We currently rely on a number of sole source and limited source suppliers to provide certain key components for our products, particularly cooled and uncooled infrared detectors. We have recently completed the acquisition of Indigo Systems Corporation, which manufactures cooled and uncooled infrared detectors, and intend to use those detectors in our Thermography and Imaging products. Accordingly, during this transition to the use of Indigos infrared detectors, we could experience a shortage in the supply of some of our components including cooled and uncooled infrared detectors. In particular, we are winding up a contract with BAE Systems (BAE) for the supply of uncooled detectors for integration into our ThermaCAM® PM695, ThermaCAM® P-Series, ThermaCAM® E-Series, ThermoVision® A20, ThermoVision® A40, ThermoVision® Security, ThermoVision® Sentry and FireFLIR® product lines. BAE is currently one of three large producers of specialized uncooled detectors. Subject to certain exceptions, the contract gives us the exclusive right to purchase uncooled
31
detectors for use in the commercial market and a limited, non-exclusive right to purchase uncooled detectors for use in the government market. Under the contract, we have the corresponding obligation to purchase uncooled detectors solely from BAE for certain defined commercial applications. Currently, the ThermaCAM® PM695, ThermaCAM® P-Series, ThermaCAM® E-Series, ThermoVision® A20, ThermoVision® Security, ThermoVision® Sentry and FireFLIR® product lines use the BAE detectors. With the conclusion of this contract, BAE is no longer bound by this exclusivity requirement for the commercial market. After expiration of the contract, which we expect to occur in 2005, we may not be able to successfully transition to the use of uncooled detectors from Indigo Systems. Our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected in the event that (i) we are unable to acquire, or BAE is unable to supply, the requisite number of detectors to satisfy our needs during the remaining term of our contract with BAE, (ii) we are unable to transition to uncooled detectors manufactured by Indigo Systems within the expected time period, or (iii) the detectors we receive from BAE or manufacture at Indigo Systems are defective or do not otherwise meet our performance standards. Failure by us to transition to the use of cooled and uncooled detectors made by Indigo Systems, or identify another source of uncooled detectors in a timely manner, would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Based on past experience, we expect to occasionally receive late deliveries or to experience inadequate supplies of certain components. If the components provided by BAE or any other significant supplier become unavailable, our manufacturing operations would be disrupted. Unless we have sufficient lead-time and are otherwise able to identify and qualify acceptable replacement components or redesign our products with different components, we might not be able to obtain necessary components on a timely basis or at acceptable prices. Any extended interruption in the supply of sole or limited source components would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We may not be successful in maintaining and obtaining the necessary export licenses to conduct operations abroad, and the United States Congress may prevent proposed sales to foreign governments.
Export licenses are required from United States Government agencies under the Export Administration Act, the Trading with the Enemy Act of 1917 and the Arms Export Control Act of 1976 for export of many of our products. We can give no assurance that we will be successful in obtaining these licenses. Recently, heightened government scrutiny of export licenses for products in our market has resulted in lengthened review periods for our license applications. Failure to obtain or delays in obtaining these licenses would prevent or delay us from selling our products outside the United States and would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We may not be able to reduce our costs quickly enough if our sales decline.
Our expense levels are based, in part, on our expectations regarding future sales, and these expenses are largely fixed, particularly in the short term. In addition, to enable us to promptly fill orders, we maintain inventories of finished goods, components and raw materials. As a result, we commit to considerable costs in advance of anticipated sales. Accordingly, we may not be able to reduce our costs in a timely manner to compensate for any unexpected shortfall between forecasted and actual sales. Any significant shortfall of sales may result in us carrying higher levels of inventories of finished goods, components and raw materials thereby increasing our risk of inventory obsolescence and corresponding inventory write-downs and write-offs. We may not carry adequate reserves to offset such write-downs or write-offs.
Our future success depends in part on attracting and retaining key senior management and qualified technical and sales personnel.
Our future success depends in part on the efforts and continued services of our key executives and our ability to attract and retain qualified technical and sales personnel. Significant competition exists for such personnel and we cannot assure the retention of our key senior managerial, technical and sales personnel or our
32
ability to attract, integrate and retain other such personnel that may be required in the future. We also cannot assure that employees will not leave and subsequently compete against us. If we are unable to attract and retain key personnel, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be adversely affected.
We have significantly increased our indebtedness as a result of the sale of the convertible notes.
In June 2003, we issued $210 million of 3.0% senior convertible notes due 2023 in a private offering pursuant to Rule 144A under the Securities Act of 1933. As a result of this indebtedness, our principal and interest payment obligations have increased substantially. Increased debt could materially and adversely affect our ability to obtain financing for working capital, acquisitions or other purposes and could make us more vulnerable to industry downturns and competitive pressures. Our ability to meet our debt service obligations will be dependent upon our future performance, which will be subject to financial, business and other factors affecting our operations, many of which are beyond our control.
We face risks from international sales and currency fluctuations.
We market and sell our products worldwide and international sales have accounted for, and are expected to continue to account for, a significant portion of our revenue. For the years ended December 31, 2002 and 2003, international sales accounted for 44% and 43%, respectively, of our total revenue. Our international sales are subject to a number of risks, including:
| the imposition of governmental controls; |
| restrictions on the export of critical technology; |
| trade restrictions; |
| difficulty in collecting receivables; |
| inadequate protection of intellectual property; |
| labor union activities; |
| changes in tariffs and taxes; |
| difficulties in staffing and managing international operations; |
| political and economic instability; and |
| general economic conditions. |
Historically, currency fluctuations have affected our operating results. Changes in the value of foreign currencies in which our sales are denominated or costs incurred have in the past caused, and could in the future cause, fluctuations in our operating results. We seek to reduce our exposure to currency fluctuations by denominating, where possible, our international sales in United States dollars. With respect to international sales denominated in United States dollars, a decrease in the value of foreign currencies relative to the United States dollar could make our products less price competitive. No assurance can be given that these factors will not have a material adverse effect on our future international sales and operations and, consequently, on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Our products may suffer from defects or errors leading to substantial damage or warranty claims.
We include complex system designs and components in our products that may contain errors or defects, particularly when we incorporate new technology into our products or release new versions. While we have not yet had to recall a product, if any of our products are defective, we might be required to redesign or recall those products or pay substantial damages or warranty claims. Such an event could result in significant expenses, disrupt sales and affect our reputation and that of our products, which would have a material adverse effect on
33
our business, financial condition and results of operations. Furthermore, product defects could result in substantial product liability. We maintain product liability insurance but cannot be certain that it is adequate or will remain available on acceptable terms.
Our inability to protect our intellectual property and proprietary rights and avoid infringing the rights of others could harm our competitive position and our business.
Our ability to compete successfully and achieve future revenue growth depends, in part, on our ability to protect our proprietary technology and operate without infringing the rights of others. To accomplish this, we rely on a combination of patent, trademark and trade secret laws, confidentiality agreements and contractual provisions to protect our proprietary rights. Most of our proprietary rights are held in confidence as trade secrets and are not covered by patents, making them more difficult to protect. Although we currently hold United States patents covering certain aspects of our technologies and products, we cannot be certain that we will obtain additional patents or trademarks on our technology, products and trade names. Furthermore, we cannot be certain that our patents or trademarks will not be challenged or circumvented by competitors. Likewise, we cannot be certain that measures taken to protect our proprietary rights will adequately deter their misappropriation or disclosure. Any failure by us to meaningfully protect our intellectual property could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Moreover, because intellectual property does not necessarily represent a barrier to entry into the thermal imaging industry, there can be no assurance that we will be able to maintain our competitive advantage or that competitors will not develop capabilities equal or superior to ours.
Litigation over patents and other intellectual property is common in our industry. We cannot be sure that we will not be the subject of patent or other litigation in the future. Defending intellectual property lawsuits and related legal and administrative proceedings could result in substantial expense to us and significant diversion of effort of our personnel. An adverse determination in a patent suit or in any other proceeding to which we may be a party could subject us to significant liabilities. An adverse determination could require us to seek licenses from third parties. If licenses were not available on commercially reasonable terms or at all, our business could be harmed.
We would be harmed if we were unable to use one of our facilities.
We manufacture our products at facilities located in the Portland, Boston and Stockholm areas. Our inability to continue to manufacture our products at one or more of our facilities as a result of, for example, a prolonged power shortage, fire or other natural disaster, would prevent us from supplying products to our customers, and could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Oregon law and our charter documents contain provisions that could discourage or prevent a potential takeover, even if the transaction would benefit our shareholders.
Other companies may seek to acquire or merge with us. An acquisition or merger of our company could result in benefits to our shareholders, including an increase in the value of our common stock. Some provisions of our Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws, including our shareholder rights plan and our ability to issue preferred stock without further action by our shareholders, as well as provisions of Oregon law, may discourage, delay or prevent a merger or acquisition that a shareholder may consider favorable.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
See Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 for a discussion of recent accounting pronouncements.
34
ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE | AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK |
The Companys exposure to market risk for changes in interest rates relates primarily to its credit agreements. The credit agreements are at variable rates. A change in interest rates on the credit agreements impacts the interest incurred and cash flows. At December 31, 2003, no amounts were outstanding on any of the Companys credit agreements; consequently, no sensitivity analysis is presented.
The Companys convertible notes carry interest at a fixed rate of 3.0%. For fixed rate debt, interest rate changes impact the fair value of the notes but do not impact earnings or cash flows. The fair value of the notes at December 31, 2003, was approximately $231 million compared to a carrying value of $204.4 million.
The Company has assets, liabilities, and inventory purchase commitments outside the United States that are subject to fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates. Similarly, certain revenues from products sold in foreign countries are sold in foreign currencies. Assets and liabilities located outside the United States are primarily located in Sweden and the United Kingdom. The Companys investments in foreign subsidiaries with functional currencies other than the US dollar are generally considered long-term. The Company does not engage in forward currency exchange contracts to reduce its economic exposure to changes in exchange rates. Because the Company markets, sells and licenses our products throughout the world, it could be significantly affected by weak economic conditions in foreign markets that could reduce demand for its products.
Our net investment in foreign subsidiaries translated into US dollars using the period-end exchange rates at December 31, 2003, was approximately $86.6 million. The potential loss in fair value resulting from a hypothetical 10% adverse change in foreign exchange rates would be approximately $8.7 million at December 31, 2003. The Company has no plans of liquidating any of its foreign subsidiaries, and therefore, foreign exchange rate gains or losses on our foreign investments are reflected as a cumulative translation adjustment and do not reduce our reported net earnings.
ITEM 8. | FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA |
This item includes the following financial information:
35
The Board of Directors and
Shareholders of FLIR Systems, Inc.
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of FLIR Systems, Inc. (an Oregon corporation) and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2003 and 2002, and the related consolidated statements of operations, shareholders equity and cash flows for the years then ended. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Companys management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits. The 2001 consolidated financial statements were audited by other auditors who have ceased operations. Those auditors expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements, before the revision described in Note 5 to the consolidated financial statements, in their report dated February 8, 2002.
We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of FLIR Systems, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2003 and 2002, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
As discussed above, the 2001 consolidated financial statements of FLIR Systems, Inc. and subsidiaries were audited by other auditors who have ceased operations. As described in Note 5, these consolidated financial statements have been revised to include the transitional disclosures required by Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets (SFAS 142), which was adopted by the Company as of January 1, 2002. In our opinion, the SFAS 142 transitional disclosures for 2001 in Note 5 are appropriate. However, we were not engaged to audit, review, or apply any procedures to the 2001 consolidated financial statements of FLIR Systems, Inc. other than with respect to such disclosures and, accordingly, we do not express an opinion or any other form of assurance on the 2001 consolidated financial statements taken as a whole.
/s/ KPMG LLP
Portland, Oregon
February 2, 2004
36
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
To the Board of Directors and
Shareholders of FLIR Systems, Inc.
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of FLIR Systems, Inc. (an Oregon corporation) and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the related consolidated statements of operations, shareholders equity and cash flows for the two years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Companys management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of FLIR Systems, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for the two years then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.
/s/ ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP
Portland, Oregon
February 8, 2002
THIS IS A COPY OF THE REPORT PREVIOUSLY ISSUED BY ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP. THIS REPORT HAS NOT BEEN REISSUED BY ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP.
ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP WERE THE INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS FOR FLIR SYSTEMS INC. UNTIL MAY 20, 2002. REPRESENTATIVES OF ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP ARE NOT AVAILABLE TO PROVIDE THE CONSENT REQUIRED FOR THE INCORPORATION BY REFERENCE OF THEIR REPORT ON THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF FLIR SYSTEMS, INC. APPEARING IN THIS ANNUAL REPORT INTO REGISTRATION STATEMENTS FILED BY FLIR SYSTEMS, INC. WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION AND CURRENTLY EFFECTIVE UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933. BECAUSE ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP HAVE NOT CONSENTED TO THE INCORPORATION BY REFERENCE OF THEIR REPORT, INVESTORS WILL NOT BE ABLE TO RECOVER AGAINST ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP UNDER SECTION 11 OF THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933 FOR ANY UNTRUE STATEMENTS OF A MATERIAL FACT CONTAINED IN THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AUDITED BY ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP THAT ARE CONTAINED IN THIS REPORT OR ANY OMISSIONS TO STATE A MATERIAL FACT REQUIRED TO BE STATED THEREIN.
THE PRIOR PERIOD FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR 2001 AND 2000 HAVE BEEN REVISED TO INCLUDE THE TRANSITIONAL DISCLOSURES REQUIRED BY STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING STANDARDS NO. 142, GOODWILL AND OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS, WHICH WAS ADOPTED BY THE COMPANY ON JANUARY 1, 2002.
37
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
Year Ended December 31, |
||||||||||||
2003 |
2002 |
2001 |
||||||||||
Revenue |
$ | 311,979 | $ | 261,080 | $ | 214,373 | ||||||
Cost of goods sold |
146,454 | 124,060 | 97,541 | |||||||||
Gross profit |
165,525 | 137,020 | 116,832 | |||||||||
Operating expenses: |
||||||||||||
Research and development |
30,665 | 26,892 | 27,235 | |||||||||
Selling, general and administrative |
65,034 | 59,597 | 51,861 | |||||||||
Total operating expenses |
95,699 | 86,489 | 79,096 | |||||||||
Earnings from operations |
69,826 | 50,531 | 37,736 | |||||||||
Interest expense |
4,861 | 2,033 | 9,847 | |||||||||
Interest income |
(2,440 | ) | (508 | ) | (448 | ) | ||||||
Other expense (income), net |
3,557 | 113 | (406 | ) | ||||||||
Earnings before income taxes |
63,848 | 48,893 | 28,743 | |||||||||
Income tax provision |
19,155 | 7,334 | 2,809 | |||||||||
Net earnings |
$ | 44,693 | $ | 41,559 | $ | 25,934 | ||||||
Net earnings per share: |
||||||||||||
Basic |
$ | 1.32 | $ | 1.23 | $ | 0.86 | ||||||
Diluted |
$ | 1.27 | $ | 1.17 | $ | 0.81 | ||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
38
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(in thousands, except for par value)
December 31, |
|||||||
2003 |
2002 |
||||||
ASSETS | |||||||
Current assets: |
|||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 197,993 | $ | 46,606 | |||
Accounts receivable, net |
79,332 | 55,798 | |||||
Inventories, net |
75,959 | 50,141 | |||||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
19,997 | 12,673 | |||||
Deferred income taxes |
8,832 | 8,887 | |||||
Total current assets |
382,113 | 174,105 | |||||
Property and equipment, net |
22,758 | 12,678 | |||||
Deferred income taxes |
21,146 | 25,977 | |||||
Goodwill |
12,500 | 12,500 | |||||
Intangible assets, net |
4,036 | 4,147 | |||||
Other assets |
7,870 | 4,415 | |||||
$ | 450,423 | $ | 233,822 | ||||
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY | |||||||
Current liabilities: |
|||||||
Accounts payable |
$ | 26,427 | $ | 16,465 | |||
Deferred revenue |
4,540 | 4,770 | |||||
Accrued payroll and related liabilities |
12,778 | 11,030 | |||||
Accrued product warranties |
3,511 | 3,432 | |||||
Advance payments from customers |
12,112 | 8,030 | |||||
Other current liabilities |
8,227 | 6,341 | |||||
Accrued income taxes |
2,742 | 2,558 | |||||
Total current liabilities |
70,337 | 52,626 | |||||
Long-term debt |
204,369 | | |||||
Pension and other long-term liabilities |
10,875 | 8,869 | |||||
Commitments and contingencies (Notes 10 and 11) |
|||||||
Shareholders equity: |
|||||||
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value, 10,000 shares authorized; no shares issued at December 31, 2003 or 2002 |
| | |||||
Common stock, $0.01 par value, 100,000 shares authorized, 32,863 and 34,599 shares issued at December 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively, and additional paid-in capital |
156,154 | 218,052 | |||||
Retained earnings (accumulated deficit) |
1,388 | (43,305 | ) | ||||
Accumulated other comprehensive earnings (loss) |
7,300 | (2,420 | ) | ||||
Total shareholders equity |
164,842 | 172,327 | |||||
$ | 450,423 | $ | 233,822 | ||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
39
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
(in thousands)
Common Stock and Additional Paid-in Capital |
Retained Earnings (Accumulated Deficit) |
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Earnings (Loss) |
Total |
Annual Comprehensive Earnings |
|||||||||||||||||||
Shares |
Amount |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance, December 31, 2000 |
29,097 | $ | 144,263 | $ | (110,798 | ) | $ | (4,440 | ) | $ | 29,025 | ||||||||||||
Net earnings for the year |
| | 25,934 | | 25,934 | $ | 25,934 | ||||||||||||||||
Common stock issued pursuant to the secondary offering, net of costs |
2,000 | 41,447 | | | 41,447 | | |||||||||||||||||
Common stock issued pursuant to purchase of Optronics Division |
200 | 20 | | | 20 | | |||||||||||||||||
Common stock issued pursuant to stock compensation plan |
43 | 164 | | | 164 | | |||||||||||||||||
Common stock options exercised |
1,585 | 7,907 | | | 7,907 | | |||||||||||||||||
Common stock issued pursuant to Employee Stock Purchase Plan |
186 | 702 | | | 702 | | |||||||||||||||||
Translation adjustment |
| | | (351 | ) | (351 | ) | (351 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Balance, December 31, 2001 |
33,111 | 194,503 | (84,864 | ) | (4,791 | ) | 104,848 | ||||||||||||||||
Comprehensive earnings, year ended December 31, 2001 |
$ | 25,583 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Net earnings for the year |
| | 41,559 | | 41,559 | $ | 41,559 | ||||||||||||||||
Expiration of put option related to purchase of Optronics Division |
| 1,415 | | | 1,415 | | |||||||||||||||||
Income tax benefit of common stock options exercised |
| 13,229 | | | 13,229 | | |||||||||||||||||
Common stock issued pursuant to stock compensation plan |
8 | 152 | | | 152 | | |||||||||||||||||
Common stock options exercised |
1,420 | 7,741 | | | 7,741 | | |||||||||||||||||
Common stock issued pursuant to Employee Stock Purchase Plan |
60 | 1,012 | | | 1,012 | | |||||||||||||||||
Translation adjustment |
| | | 2,490 | 2,490 | 2,490 | |||||||||||||||||
Minimum liability adjustment for Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan |
| | | (119 | ) | (119 | ) | (119 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Balance, December 31, 2002 |
34,599 | 218,052 | (43,305 | ) | (2,420 | ) | 172,327 | ||||||||||||||||
Comprehensive earnings, year ended December 31, 2002 |
$ | 43,930 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Net earnings for the year |
| | 44,693 | | 44,693 | $ | 44,693 | ||||||||||||||||
Income tax benefit of common stock options exercised |
| 5,117 | | | 5,117 | | |||||||||||||||||
Repurchase of common stock |
(2,678 | ) | (75,451 | ) | | | (75,451 | ) | | ||||||||||||||
Common stock options exercised |
885 | 7,225 | | | 7,225 | | |||||||||||||||||
Common stock issued pursuant to Employee Stock Purchase Plan |
57 | 1,211 | | | 1,211 | | |||||||||||||||||
Unrealized loss on short-term investments |
| | | (779 | ) | (779 | ) | (779 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Translation adjustment |
| | | 10,380 | 10,380 | 10,380 | |||||||||||||||||
Minimum liability adjustment for Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan |
| | | 119 | 119 | 119 | |||||||||||||||||
Balance, December 31, 2003 |
32,863 | $ | 156,154 | $ | 1,388 | $ | 7,300 | $ | 164,842 | ||||||||||||||
Comprehensive earnings, year ended December 31, 2003 |
$ | 54,413 | |||||||||||||||||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements
40
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(in thousands)
Year Ended December 31, |
||||||||||||
2003 |
2002 |
2001 |
||||||||||
CASH PROVIDED BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES: |
||||||||||||
Net earnings |
$ | 44,693 | $ | 41,559 | $ | 25,934 | ||||||
Income charges not affecting cash: |
||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
6,262 | 6,201 | 7,500 | |||||||||
Disposal and write-offs of property and equipment |
78 | 73 | 1,225 | |||||||||
Fair value adjustment of swap agreements |
| (281 | ) | 1,026 | ||||||||
Deferred income taxes |
4,886 | (10,943 | ) | (207 | ) | |||||||
Income tax benefit of stock options |
5,117 | 13,229 | | |||||||||
Common stock issued pursuant to stock compensation plan |
| 152 | | |||||||||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: |
||||||||||||
(Increase) decrease in accounts receivable |
(19,295 | ) | 3,995 | (18,349 | ) | |||||||
(Increase) decrease in inventories |
(21,382 | ) | (1,856 | ) | 11,065 | |||||||
Increase in prepaid expenses and other current assets |
(5,875 | ) | (733 | ) | (4,507 | ) | ||||||
Increase in other assets |
(1,135 | ) | (2,207 | ) | (1,624 | ) | ||||||
Increase (decrease) in accounts payable |
8,757 | (2,737 | ) | 1,994 | ||||||||
(Decrease) increase in deferred revenue |
(419 | ) | (595 | ) | 3,700 | |||||||
Increase in accrued payroll and other liabilities |
4,582 | 4,720 | 993 | |||||||||
(Decrease) increase in accrued income taxes |
(475 | ) | 1,395 | (1,817 | ) | |||||||
Increase in pension and other long-term liabilities |
1,431 | 3,048 | 776 | |||||||||
Cash provided by operating activities |
27,225 | 55,020 | 27,709 | |||||||||
CASH USED BY INVESTING ACTIVITIES: |
||||||||||||
Additions to property and equipment |
(14,598 | ) | (6,599 | ) | (4,242 | ) | ||||||
Investment in insurance contracts |
(2,601 | ) | | | ||||||||
Cash received from acquisition of Optronics Division |
| | 249 | |||||||||
Other investments |
(1,051 | ) | (519 | ) | | |||||||
Cash used by investing activities |
(18,250 | ) | (7,118 | ) | (3,993 | ) | ||||||
CASH PROVIDED (USED) BY FINANCING ACTIVITIES: |
||||||||||||
Proceeds from issuance of convertible notes, net of issuance costs |
203,859 | | | |||||||||
Repayment of credit agreement including current portion |
| (19,900 | ) | (70,000 | ) | |||||||
Net (decrease) increase in international credit line and other short-term debt |
| (3,470 | ) | 759 | ||||||||
Repayments of capital leases and other long-term debt, including current portion |
| (530 | ) | (1,109 | ) | |||||||
Settlement of interest rate swap agreements |
| (2,082 | ) | | ||||||||
Payment of financing fees |
| (799 | ) | | ||||||||
Repurchase of common stock |
(75,451 | ) | | | ||||||||
Common stock issued pursuant to secondary offering, net of costs |
| | 41,447 | |||||||||
Proceeds from exercise of stock options |
7,225 | 7,741 | 7,907 | |||||||||
Proceeds from shares issued pursuant to employee stock purchase plan |
1,211 | 1,012 | 702 | |||||||||
Cash provided (used) by financing activities |
136,844 | (18,028 | ) | (20,294 | ) | |||||||
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash |
5,568 | 1,218 | 234 | |||||||||
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents |
151,387 | 31,092 | 3,656 | |||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year |
46,606 | 15,514 | 11,858 | |||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents, end of year |
$ | 197,993 | $ | 46,606 | $ | 15,514 | ||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements
41
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note 1. Nature of Business and Significant Accounting Policies
FLIR Systems, Inc. (the Company) designs, manufactures and markets thermal imaging and stabilized camera systems for a wide variety of applications in the commercial, industrial, and government markets. The Companys products are produced in a variety of configurations to suit specific customer needs. These include compact hand-held systems for a variety of commercial and government applications including surveillance, search and rescue, and industrial analysis and monitoring; sealed, autonomous systems for fixed security monitoring installations; and stabilized gimbaled systems for airborne and shipborne use. The Companys thermal imaging systems use advanced infrared technology that detects infrared radiation, or heat, enabling the operator to measure minute temperature differences and to see objects in total darkness and in all types of adverse conditions including through smoke, haze and most types of fog. Many of the Companys products also incorporate visible light cameras, laser rangefinders, laser illuminators, image analysis software and gyro-stabilized gimbal technology.
Principles of consolidation
The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly owned subsidiaries. All intercompany accounts and transactions were eliminated.
Stock Split
On May 29, 2003, the Company effected a two-for-one split for each share of common stock outstanding on May 12, 2003. The Company issued approximately 17.5 million shares of common stock as a result of the stock split. The Companys number of shares and per share amounts of common stock have been restated to reflect the stock split for all periods presented.
Foreign currency translation
The assets and liabilities of the Companys foreign subsidiaries are translated into US dollars at current exchange rates while revenues and expenses are translated at average exchange rates for the year. Resulting translation adjustments are reflected in accumulated other comprehensive earnings (loss) within shareholders equity. Transaction gains and losses that arise from exchange rate fluctuations on transactions denominated in currencies other than the functional currency are included in the consolidated statement of operations as incurred.
The cumulative translation adjustment, included in accumulated other comprehensive earnings is an $8,079,000 gain and a $2,301,000 loss at December 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively.
Revenue recognition
Revenue is recognized upon delivery of the product to the customer at a fixed or determinable price with a reasonable assurance of collection, passage of title to the customer as indicated by the shipping terms and fulfillment of all significant obligations, pursuant to guidance provided by Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 104, Revenue Recognition (SAB 104), issued by the Securities and Exchange Commission in December 2003. SAB 104 clarified existing guidance, principally those provided by SAB 101, Revenue Recognition in Financial Statements, regarding revenues for contracts that contain multiple elements.
The Company designs, markets and sells products as commercial, off-the-shelf products. Many of the Companys Imaging customers, particularly those who use its airborne systems, request different system configurations, based on standard options or accessories that the Company offers. In general, revenue
42
FLIR SYSTEMS, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
Note 1. Nature of Business and Significant Accounting Policies(Continued)
Revenue recognition(Continued)
arrangements do not involve acceptance provisions based upon customer specified acceptance criteria. In those limited circumstances when customer specified acceptance criteria exist, revenue is deferred until customer acceptance if the Company cannot demonstrate the system meets those specifications prior to shipment. For any contracts with multiple elements (i.e., training, installation, additional parts), the Company recognizes revenue only after it has determined that elements with stand alone values have been delivered and any undelivered elements have objective and reliable evidence of fair value. Credit is not extended to customers and revenue is not recognized until the Company has determined that the risk of uncollectibility is minimal.
The Companys products are sold with warranty provisions that require it to remedy deficiencies in quality or performance of the Companys products over a specified period of time, generally twelve months, at no cost to its customers. Warranty reserves are established at the time that revenue is recognized at levels that represent the Companys estimate of the costs that will be incurred to fulfill those warranty requirements.
Provisions for estimated losses on sales or related receivables are recorded when identified. Revenue is stated net of representative commissions. Service revenue is deferred and recognized over the contract period as is the case for extended warranty contracts, or as services are provided.
Research and development
Expenditures for research and development activities are expensed as incurred.
Cash and cash equivalents
The Company considers short-term investments that are highly liquid, readily convertible into cash and have original maturities of less than three months when purchased to be cash equivalents. At December 31, 2003, short-term investments are classified as available-for-sale and reported at fair market value with the related unrealized holding gains and losses excluded from earnings and included in accumulated other comprehensive earnings within shareholders equity.
Inventories
Inventories are generally stated at the lower of cost or market and include materials, labor, and manufacturing overhead. Cost is determined based on a currently adjusted standard basis that approximates actual cost on a first-in, first-out basis.
Inventory write downs are established when conditions exist that suggest that inventories may be in excess of anticipated demand or are obsolete based upon the Companys assumptions about future demand for its products and market conditions. The Company regularly evaluates its ability to realize the value of inventories based on a combination of factors including the following: historical usage rates, forecasted sales or usage, product end of life dates, estimated current and future market values and new product introductions. When recorded, write downs are intended to reduce the carrying value of the Companys inventories to their net realizable value and create a new cost-basis in the inventories.
Property and equipment
Property and equipment are stated at cost and are depreciated using a straight-line methodology over their estimated useful lives. Repairs and maintenance are charged to expense as incurred.
43
FLIR SYSTEMS, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
Note 1. Nature of Business and Significant Accounting Policies(Continued)
Long-lived assets
Long-lived assets are reviewed for impairment when circumstances indicate that the carrying amounts may not be recoverable. Impairment exists when the carrying value is greater than the expected undiscounted future cash flows expected to be provided by the asset. If impairment exists, the asset is written down to its fair value.
Advertising costs
Advertising costs, which are included in selling, general and administrative expenses, are expensed as incurred.
Earnings per share
Basic earnings per share is based on the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per share is computed similar to basic earnings per share except that the weighted shares outstanding are increased to include additional shares from the assumed exercise of stock options, if dilutive. The number of additional shares is calculated by assuming that outstanding stock options were exercised and that the proceeds from such exercises were used to acquire shares of common stock at the average market price during the reporting period. The following table sets forth the reconciliation of the denominator utilized in the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share (in thousands):
Year Ended December 31, | ||||||
2003 |
2002 |
2001 | ||||
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding |
33,731 | 33,709 | 29,984 | |||
Assumed exercise of stock options net of shares assumed reacquired under the treasury stock method |
1,427 | 1,961 | 2,087 | |||
Diluted shares outstanding |
35,158 | 35,670 | 32,071 | |||
The effect of stock options for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001 that aggregated 13,675, 540,072 and 1,611,400, respectively, have been excluded for purposes of diluted earnings per share since the effect would have been anti-dilutive. Shares issuable of 4,731,426 on conversion of the Companys convertible notes have been excluded for purposes of diluted earnings per share as the circumstances that allow for conversion have not been met.
Supplemental cash flow disclosure (in thousands)
Year Ended December 31, | |||||||||
2003 |
2002 |
2001 | |||||||
Cash paid for: |
|||||||||
Interest |
$ | 3,458 | $ | 1,909 | $ | 7,943 | |||
Taxes |
$ | 8,871 | $ | 4,091 | $ | 3,519 | |||
Significant non-cash transactions: |
|||||||||
Common stock issued for purchase of Optronics Division |
$ | | $ | | $ | 1,435 |
Fair value of financial instruments
For cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued payroll and related liabilities, the carrying amount approximates the fair value of the immediate or short-term nature of those instruments. The fair value of the long-term debt is estimated based on quoted market prices of the convertible notes. At December 31, 2003, the fair value of the notes was approximately $231 million.
44
FLIR SYSTEMS, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
Note 1. Nature of Business and Significant Accounting Policies(Continued)
Stock-based compensation
The Company has adopted the disclosure provisions of SFAS 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation. SFAS 123 allows companies to choose whether to account for stock-based compensation under the intrinsic value method prescribed in Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25 (APB 25) or use the fair value method described in SFAS 123. In December 2002, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued SFAS 148, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation Transition and Disclosure. SFAS 148 amends SFAS 123 for certain transition provisions for companies electing to adopt the fair value method, and amends SFAS 123 for certain financial statement disclosures.
The Company follows the provisions of APB 25 and related interpretations in accounting for its stock-based employee compensation plans, which are described more fully in Note 14. No significant stock-based employee compensation costs are reflected in net earnings, as all options granted under those plans had an exercise price equal to the market value of the underlying common stock on the date of grant. The following table illustrates the effect on net earnings and earnings per share if the Company had applied the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS 123 to stock-based employee compensation (in thousands, except per share amounts):
Year Ended December 31, |
||||||||||||
2003 |
2002 |
2001 |
||||||||||
Net earningsas reported |
$ | 44,693 | $ | 41,559 | $ | 25,934 | ||||||
Deduct: Total stock-based compensation expense determined under fair value method |
(6,328 | ) | (13,954 | ) | (5,478 | ) | ||||||
Net earningspro forma |
$ | 38,365 | $ | 27,605 | $ | 20,456 | ||||||
Earnings per share: |
||||||||||||
Basicas reported |
$ | 1.32 | $ | 1.23 | $ | 0.86 | ||||||
Dilutedas reported |
$ | 1.27 | $ | 1.17 | $ | 0.81 | ||||||
Earnings per share: |
||||||||||||
Basicpro forma |
$ | 1.14 | $ | 0.82 | $ | 0.68 | ||||||
Dilutedpro forma |
$ | 1.09 | $ | 0.77 | $ | 0.64 |
The fair value of the stock-based awards granted in 2003, 2002 and 2001 reported above was estimated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following weighted-average assumptions:
2003 |
2002 |
2001 |
|||||||
Employee Stock Option Plans: |
|||||||||
Risk-free interest rate |
2.1 | % | 2.9 | % | 3.8 | % | |||
Expected dividend yield |
0.0 | % | 0.0 | % | 0.0 | % | |||
Expected life |
3 years | 3 years | 3 years | ||||||
Expected volatility |
59.9 | % | 69.3 | % | 85.0 | % | |||
Employee Stock Purchase Plan: |
|||||||||
Risk-free interest rate |
1.2 | % | 1.9 | % | 5.5 | % | |||
Expected dividend yield |
0.0 | % | 0.0 | % | 0.0 | % | |||
Expected life |
6 months | 6 months | 6 months | ||||||
Expected volatility |
44.0 | % | 73.1 | % | 96.2 | % |
The Black-Scholes option pricing model was developed for use in estimating the fair value of traded options that have no vesting restrictions and are fully transferable. In addition, option pricing models require the input of
45
FLIR SYSTEMS, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
Note 1. Nature of Business and Significant Accounting Policies(Continued)
Stock-based compensation(Continued)
highly subjective assumptions, including the expected stock price volatility. Under the Black-Scholes option pricing model, the weighted-average estimated values of employee stock options granted during 2003, 2002 and 2001 was $10.80, $9.79 and $10.46, respectively. The weighted-average estimated values of shares granted under the Employee Stock Purchase Plan during 2003, 2002 and 2001 was $7.39, $7.58, $2.07, respectively.
Concentration of risk
Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to concentration of credit risk consist primarily of trade receivables. Concentration of credit risk with respect to trade receivables is limited because a relatively large number of geographically diverse customers make up the Companys customer base, thus diversifying the trade credit risk. The Company controls credit risk through credit approvals, credit limits and monitoring procedures. The Company performs credit evaluations for all new customers and requires letters of credit, bank guarantees and advanced payments, if deemed necessary.
A substantial portion of the Companys revenue is derived from sales to US and foreign government agencies (see Note 15). The Company also purchases certain key components from sole or limited source suppliers.
The Company maintains cash deposits with major banks that from time to time may exceed federally insured limits. The Company periodically assesses the financial condition of the institutions and believes that the risk of any loss is minimal.
Use of estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States requires management to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. Significant estimates and judgments made by management of the Company include matters such as collectibility of accounts receivable, realizability of inventories, realizability of investments, recoverability of deferred tax assets, impairment of goodwill, loss contingencies and adequacy of warranty accruals. Actual results could differ from those estimates. The Company believes that the estimates used are reasonable.
Accumulated other comprehensive earnings
Accumulated other comprehensive earnings includes cumulative translation adjustments, additional minimum liability adjustments on the Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan, and unrealized losses on short-term investments.
Reclassifications
Certain minor reclassifications have been made to prior years data to conform to the current years presentation. These reclassifications had no impact on previously reported results of operations or shareholders equity.
46
FLIR SYSTEMS, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
Note 1. Nature of Business and Significant Accounting Policies(Continued)
Recent accounting pronouncements
In November 2002, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued FASB Interpretation No. 45 (FIN 45), Guarantors Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others. FIN 45 requires that upon issuance of a guarantee, a guarantor must recognize a liability for the fair value of an obligation assumed under guarantee. FIN 45 also requires additional disclosures by a guarantor in its financial statements about the obligations associated with guarantees issued. The initial recognition and measurement provisions of FIN 45 are applicable on a prospective basis of guarantees issued or modified after December 31, 2002. The disclosure requirements of FIN 45 are effective for financial statements issued after December 15, 2002. Adoption of this interpretation did not have an impact on the Companys financial position or results of operations. Additionally, the Company has adopted the disclosure provisions herein.
Note 2. Accounts Receivable
Accounts receivable are net of an allowance for doubtful accounts of $1.3 million and $1.4 million at December 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively.
Note 3. Inventories
Inventories consist of the following (in thousands):
December 31, | ||||||
2003 |
2002 | |||||
Raw material and subassemblies |
$ | 41,190 | $ | 32,825 | ||
Work-in-progress |
25,682 | 12,700 | ||||
Finished goods |
9,087 | 4,616 | ||||
$ | 75,959 | $ | 50,141 | |||
Note 4. Property and Equipment
Property and equipment are summarized as follows (in thousands):
Estimated Useful Life |
December 31, |
|||||||||
2003 |
2002 |
|||||||||
Land |
| $ | 1,400 | $ | | |||||
Building |
30 years | 9,151 | | |||||||
Machinery and equipment |
3 to 7 years | 29,355 | 28,144 | |||||||
Office equipment and other |
3 to 10 years | 29,896 | 25,189 | |||||||
69,802 | 53,333 | |||||||||
Less accumulated depreciation |
(47,044 | ) | (40,655 | ) | ||||||
$ | 22,758 | $ | 12,678 | |||||||
Note 5. Goodwill
The Company recorded goodwill in connection with its acquisition of AGEMA Infrared Systems AB in 1997. During the year ended December 31, 2002, the Company adopted the provisions of SFAS 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets. SFAS 142 changed the accounting for goodwill from an amortization method to an impairment-only approach. The Companys goodwill has been assigned to its Thermography operating segment.
47
FLIR SYSTEMS, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
Note 5. Goodwill(Continued)
The Company reviews goodwill in June of each year for impairment to determine if events or changes in business conditions indicate that the carrying value of the asset may not be recoverable. Such reviews assess the fair value of the assets based upon the Companys estimates of the future cash flows the Company expects the assets to generate within the boundary of the overall market capitalization of the Company. As of December 31, 2003, the Company has determined that there is no impairment of its recorded goodwill.
SFAS 142 also requires disclosure of what reported net income would have been in all periods presented exclusive of amortization expense recognized in those periods related to goodwill that is no longer being amortized. The following table illustrates what the Companys net earnings and basic and diluted net earnings per share would have been during the year ended December 31, 2001, exclusive of the amortization expense related to goodwill (in thousands, except per share data):
Year Ended December 31, 2001 | |||
Reported net earnings |
$ | 25,934 | |
Add back: Goodwill amortization, net of tax |
1,031 | ||
Adjusted net earnings |
$ | 26,965 | |
Basic earnings per share: |
|||
Reported net earnings |
$ | 0.86 | |
Add back: Goodwill amortization, net of tax |
0.04 | ||
Adjusted net earnings |
$ | 0.90 | |
Diluted earnings per share: |
|||
Reported net earnings |
$ | 0.81 | |
Add back: Goodwill amortization, net of tax |
0.03 | ||
Adjusted net earnings |
$ | 0.84 | |
Note 6. Intangible Assets
Intangible assets are summarized as follows (in thousands):
Estimated Useful Life |
December 31, |
|||||||||
2003 |
2002 |
|||||||||
Patents |
17 years | 4,458 | 4,458 | |||||||
Cooperation agreement and other |
10 years | 2,565 | 2,204 | |||||||
7,023 | 6,662 | |||||||||
Less accumulated amortization |
(2,987 | ) | (2,515 | ) | ||||||
$ | 4,036 | $ | 4,147 | |||||||
The aggregate amortization expense recorded in 2003 was approximately $459,000. The future estimated aggregate amortization expenses are approximately $453,000 in 2004, $453,000 in 2005, $453,000 in 2006, $433,000 in 2007 and $431,000 in 2008.
48
FLIR SYSTEMS, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
Note 7. Credit Agreements
The Company maintains a Credit Agreement with Bank of America, N.A., KeyBank, N.A., and Union Bank of California, N.A. The agreement, dated March 22, 2002 and amended June 5, 2003, provides for a $35 million, three-year revolving line of credit with an option for an additional $25 million until September 27, 2004. Under the Credit Agreement, borrowings will bear interest based upon the prime lending rate of the Bank of America or Eurodollar rates with a provision for a spread over such rates based upon the Companys leverage ratio. At December 31, 2003, the interest rate ranged from 2.60% to 4.00%. The Credit Agreement contains five financial covenants that require the maintenance of certain fixed charge and leverage ratios in addition to minimum levels of EBITDA and consolidated net worth and a maximum level of capital expenditures. The Credit Agreement is collateralized by substantially all assets of the Company. At December 31, 2003, the Company had no amounts outstanding under the Credit Agreement and was in compliance with all covenants. The Company had $1.2 million of letters of credit outstanding at December 31, 2003.
The Company, through two of its subsidiaries, has a 50 million Swedish Kroner (approximately $6.8 million) line of credit at 3.7% and a $2 million line of credit at 5.25% at December 31, 2003. At December 31, 2003, the Company had no amounts outstanding on these lines. The 50 million Swedish Kroner line of credit is secured primarily by accounts receivable and inventories of the applicable subsidiary and is subject to automatic renewal on an annual basis. On July 10, 2003, the 50 million Swedish Kroner credit agreement replaced the old agreement of 60 million Swedish Kroner with the same terms. The $2 million line of credit is secured by substantially all assets of the applicable subsidiary and is subject to renegotiation annually.
Note 8. Accrued Product Warranties
The Company generally provides a one-year warranty on its products. A provision for the estimated future costs of warranty, based upon historical cost and product performance experience, is recorded when revenue is recognized. The following table summarizes the Companys warranty liability and activity for 2003 and 2002 (in thousands):
Year Ended December 31, |
||||||||
2003 |
2002 |
|||||||
Accrued product warranties, beginning of year |
$ | 3,432 | $ | 2,629 | ||||
Amounts paid for warranty services |
(3,825 | ) | (3,413 | ) | ||||
Warranty provisions for products sold |
3,904 | 4,216 | ||||||
Aggregate changes related to pre-existing warranties |
| | ||||||
Accrued product warranties, end of year |
$ | 3,511 | $ | 3,432 | ||||
Note 9. Long-Term Debt
In June 2003, the Company issued $210 million of 3.0% senior convertible notes due 2023 in a private offering pursuant to Rule 144A under the Securities Act of 1933. The issuance was made through an initial offering of $175 million made on June 11, 2003, and the subsequent exercise in full by the underwriters of their option to purchase an additional $35 million on June 17, 2003. The net proceeds from the issuance were approximately $203.9 million. Issuance costs are being amortized over a period of seven years. Interest is payable semiannually on June 1 and December 1 of each year beginning on December 1, 2003. The holders of the notes may convert all or some of their notes into shares of the Companys common stock at a conversion rate of 22.5306 shares per $1,000 principal amount of notes, subject to adjustments, prior to the maturity date in certain circumstances. These circumstances generally include (a) the market price of the Companys common stock exceeding 130% of the conversion price, (b) the Company calling the notes for redemption, (c) the
49
FLIR SYSTEMS, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
Note 9. Long-Term Debt(Continued)
occurrence of specified corporate transactions, or (d) if the notes become rated and such rating is lowered by two or more rating levels. The Company may redeem for cash all or part of the notes on or after June 8, 2010. Note holders have the right to require the Company to purchase their notes on or after June 1, 2010. The proceeds are being used for general corporate purposes, which include the acquisition of Indigo Systems Corporation and working capital and capital expenditure needs.
Note 10. Commitments
The Company leases its primary facilities under various operating leases that expire in 2004 through 2009. Total rent expense for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001 amounted to $5.0 million, $4.5 million and $4.5 million, respectively. In addition, the Company is party to long-term or minimum purchase agreements with suppliers and vendors. The future minimum obligations under operating leases and other commitments are as follows (in thousands):
Operating Leases |
Purchase Obligations | |||||
2004 |
$ | 5,121 | $ | 10,551 | ||
2005 |
3,205 | 1,823 | ||||
2006 |
1,863 | | ||||
2007 |
1,298 | | ||||
2008 |
449 | | ||||
Thereafter |
57 | | ||||
Total minimum payments |
$ | 11,993 | $ | 12,374 | ||
Note 11. Contingencies
The Company is subject to legal proceedings, claims and litigation arising in the ordinary course of business. In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 5 Accounting for Contingencies, the Company makes a provision for a liability when it is both probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of loss can be reasonably estimated. The Company believes it has recorded adequate provisions for any probable and estimable losses. While the outcome of these matters is currently not determinable, the Company does not expect that the ultimate costs to resolve such matters will have a material adverse effect on the Companys financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
Note 12. Income Taxes
SFAS 109, Accounting for Income Taxes, requires the Company to recognize deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of events and basis differences that have been recognized in the Companys financial statements and tax returns. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on the difference between the financial statement carrying amount and the tax basis of assets and liabilities using the enacted tax rates in effect in the years in which the differences are expected to reverse.
Pre-tax earnings by significant geographical locations are as follows (in thousands):
Year Ended December 31, | |||||||||
2003 |
2002 |
2001 | |||||||
United States |
$ | 22,984 | $ | 30,708 | $ | 13,250 | |||
Foreign |
40,864 | 18,185 | 15,493 | ||||||
$ | 63,848 | $ | 48,893 | $ | 28,743 | ||||
50
FLIR SYSTEMS, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
Note 12. Income Taxes(Continued)
The provisions for income taxes are as follows (in thousands):
Year Ended December 31, |
||||||||||||
2003 |
2002 |
2001 |
||||||||||
Current tax expense (benefit): |
||||||||||||
Federal |
$ | (88 | ) | $ | | $ | (694 | ) | ||||
State |
(468 | ) | 1,308 | 813 | ||||||||
Foreign |
9,708 | 3,740 | 2,896 | |||||||||
9,152 | 5,048 | 3,015 | ||||||||||
Deferred tax expense: |
||||||||||||
Federal |
1,906 | 5,553 | 8,825 | |||||||||
State |
218 | 476 | 508 | |||||||||
Foreign |
2,762 | 1,225 | 837 | |||||||||
4,886 | 7,254 | 10,170 | ||||||||||
Income tax effect of stock options exercised |
5,117 | 13,229 | | |||||||||
Decrease in valuation allowance |
| (18,197 | ) | (10,376 | ) | |||||||
Total provision |
$ | 19,155 | $ | 7,334 | $ | 2,809 | ||||||
Deferred tax assets (liabilities) are composed of the following components (in thousands):
December 31, |
||||||||
2003 |
2002 |
|||||||
Allowance for doubtful accounts |
$ | 206 | $ | 339 | ||||
Accrued product warranties |
745 | 1,017 | ||||||
Inventory basis differences |
5,712 | 4,220 | ||||||
Accrued liabilities |
1,046 | 2,052 | ||||||
Deferred revenue |
872 | 1,249 | ||||||
Other |
251 | 10 | ||||||
Net current deferred tax assets |
$ | 8,832 | $ | 8,887 | ||||
Net operating loss carryforwards |
$ | 21,323 | $ | 25,264 | ||||
Credit carryforwards |
6,398 | 4,265 | ||||||
Depreciation |
(530 | ) | (545 | ) | ||||
Foreign untaxed legal reserves |
(5,933 | ) | (3,039 | ) | ||||
Other |
(112 | ) | 32 | |||||
Gross long-term deferred tax asset |
21,146 | 25,977 | ||||||
Deferred tax asset valuation allowance |
| | ||||||
Net long-term deferred tax assets |
$ | 21,146 | $ | 25,977 | ||||
51
FLIR SYSTEMS, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
Note 12. Income Taxes(Continued)
The provision for income taxes differs from the amount of tax determined by applying the applicable US statutory federal income tax rate to pretax income as a result of the following differences:
Year Ended December 31, |
|||||||||
2003 |
2002 |
2001 |
|||||||
Statutory federal tax rate |
35.0 | % | 34.0 | % | 34.0 | % | |||
Increase (decrease) in rates resulting from: |
|||||||||
State taxes |
2.4 | 3.7 | 2.9 | ||||||
Federal and state income tax credits |
(1.7 | ) | | | |||||
Deemed dividend |
| 5.8 | | ||||||
Decrease in valuation allowance |
| (26.5 | ) | (36.1 | ) | ||||
Non-deductible expenses |
0.4 | | | ||||||
Foreign rate differential |
(5.7 | ) | (2.9 | ) | (3.3 | ) | |||
Net effect of unremitted foreign earnings |
| | 11.7 | ||||||
Other |
(0.4 | ) | 0.9 | 0.6 | |||||
Effective tax rate |
30.0 | % | 15.0 | % | 9.8 | % | |||
At December 31, 2003, the Company had US tax net operating loss carryforwards totaling approximately $54.7 million which expire in the years 2019 through 2021. Additionally, the Company has various US tax credits available aggregating $6.4 million, which expire in the years 2007 through 2022.
In 2001, the Company changed its policy of providing taxes on unremitted foreign earnings. Given the substantial increase in corporate liquidity, the potential negative US tax consequences of remitting foreign earnings, and the Companys strategic intent to permanently reinvest foreign earnings, the Company no longer provides taxes on unremitted foreign earnings.
SFAS 109 requires that the tax benefits described above be recorded as an asset to the extent that management assesses the utilization of such assets to be more likely than not; otherwise, a valuation allowance is required to be recorded. Based on this guidance, the Company believes that the deferred tax assets of $30.0 million reflected on the December 31, 2003 consolidated balance sheet, are realizable based on future forecasts of taxable income over a relatively short time horizon and has not recorded a valuation allowance. The Company may be required to record a valuation allowance against the deferred tax assets in future periods if its future forecasts of taxable income are not achieved.
Note 13. Capital Stock
On June 2, 1999, the Board of Directors approved a Shareholder Rights Plan that provides for the issuance of one right for each share of outstanding common stock. The Company has reserved 300,000 shares of its capital series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock under this plan. The rights will become exercisable only in the event that an acquiring party acquires beneficial ownership of 15% or more of the Companys outstanding common stock or announces a tender or exchange offer, the consummation of which would result in beneficial ownership by that party of 15% or more of the Companys outstanding common stock. Each right entitles the holder to purchase one one-hundredth of a share of the Companys A Junior Participating Preferred Stock with economic terms similar to that of one share of the Companys common stock at a purchase price of $65.00, subject to adjustment. The Company will generally be entitled to redeem the rights at $0.01 per right at any time on or prior to the tenth day after an acquiring person has acquired beneficial ownership of 15% or more of the Companys
52
FLIR SYSTEMS, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
Note 13. Capital Stock(Continued)
common stock. If an acquiring person or group acquires beneficial ownership of 15% or more of the Companys outstanding common stock and the Company does not redeem or exchange the rights, each right not beneficially owned by the acquiring person or group will entitle its holder to purchase, at the rights then current exercise price, that number of shares of common stock having a value equal to two times the exercise price. The rights expire on June 2, 2009 if not previously redeemed, exchanged or exercised.
Note 14. Employee Benefit Plans
Stock Option Plans
The Company has two stock incentive plans for employees and consultants: the FLIR Systems, Inc. 1992 Stock Incentive Plan (the 1992 Plan) and the FLIR Systems, Inc. 2002 Stock Incentive Plan (the 2002 Plan). Under these plans, incentive stock options and non-qualified stock options may be granted with an exercise price of not less than the fair market value of the stock on the date of the grant. The options generally become exercisable over a three-year period beginning one year after grant and expire ten years from the date of grant or up to three months following termination of employment, whichever occurs earlier. Options granted prior to the termination of the 1992 Plan in 2002 remain available until their expiration. No additional options may be granted under the 1992 Plan. The 2002 Plan terminates in 2012.
The FLIR Systems, Inc. 1993 Stock Option Plan for Non-Employee Directors (the 1993 Plan) provides for the automatic grant of stock options to non-employee directors on the date immediately following the Annual Meeting of Shareholders. Stock options are granted at the fair market value at the date of grant, are exercisable on date of grant, and expire ten years from the date of grant or termination as a director, whichever occurs earlier. The 1993 Plan may be terminated by action of the Board of Directors or the Companys shareholders.
Information with respect to activity under the stock options plans is as follows:
Shares |
Weighted Average Exercise Price | |||||
Outstanding at December 31, 2000 |
4,263,932 | $ | 5.06 | |||
Granted |
1,771,242 | 16.48 | ||||
Exercised |
(1,584,926 | ) | 4.99 | |||
Terminated |
(4,684 | ) | 6.41 | |||
Outstanding at December 31, 2001 |
4,445,564 | 9.54 | ||||
Granted |
1,531,890 | 20.46 | ||||
Exercised |
(1,424,294 | ) | 5.48 | |||
Terminated |
(42,798 | ) | 11.72 | |||
Outstanding at December 31, 2002 |
4,510,362 | 14.51 | ||||
Granted |
145,399 | 26.08 | ||||
Exercised |
(887,435 | ) | 8.20 | |||
Terminated |
(57,400 | ) | 15.96 | |||
Outstanding at December 31, 2003 |
3,710,926 | $ | 16.44 | |||
53
FLIR SYSTEMS, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
Note 14. Employee Benefit Plans(Continued)
Stock Option Plans(Continued)
The following table summarizes information about outstanding and exercisable options at December 31, 2003:
Options Outstanding |
Options Exercisable | |||||||||||
Exercise Price Range |
Number of Shares |
Weighted Average Exercise Price |
Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life |
Number of Shares |
Weighted Average Exercise Price | |||||||
$ 0.19 $ 6.25 | 564,934 | $ | 3.39 | 6.4 | 560,934 | $ | 3.39 | |||||
$ 6.75 $11.10 | 222,158 | 8.59 | 4.7 | 220,158 | 8.59 | |||||||
$14.11 $17.28 | 263,800 | 14.58 | 7.7 | 251,200 | 14.48 | |||||||
$18.35 $18.35 | 764,311 | 18.35 | 8.7 | 246,686 | 18.35 | |||||||
$18.50 $18.50 | 1,110,724 | 18.50 | 8.0 | 1,110,724 | 18.50 | |||||||
$18.95 $23.45 | 542,000 | 23.30 | 8.1 | 275,000 | 23.26 | |||||||
$23.63 $30.11 | 242,999 | 25.29 | 9.0 | 145,200 | 24.21 | |||||||
3,710,926 | $ | 16.44 | 7.8 | 2,809,902 | $ | 15.09 | ||||||
At December 31, 2002 and 2001, stock options exercisable were 2,476,072 and 2,283,164, respectively.
As of December 31, 2003, there are 5,431,237 shares of common stock reserved for future issuance under all of the stock option plans.
Employee Stock Purchase Plan
In 1999, the Company established an Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the ESPP) which allows employees to purchase the Companys common stock through payroll deductions. Under the ESPP, eligible employees, subject to certain restrictions, may purchase shares of the Companys common stock at 85% of fair market value at either the date of enrollment or the date of purchase, whichever is less. The ESPP expires in 2009 or by action of the Companys Board of Directors, whichever occurs earlier. The Company issued 56,612 shares in 2003, 60,218 shares in 2002 and 185,996 shares in 2001 under the ESPP. Of the 3,000,000 shares authorized to be issued under the ESPP, 2,498,784 shares remained available at December 31, 2003.
Employee 401(k) Plans
The Company has a 401(k) Savings and Retirement Plan (the Plan) to provide for voluntary salary deferral contributions on a pre-tax basis for employees within the United States in accordance with Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. The Plan allows for contributions by the Company. The Company made and expensed matching contributions of $1.2 million, $1.1 million and $1.0 million for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively. The Company also has a funded retirement obligation to a former executive officer that has been recorded at its present value and is reported in other long-term liabilities.
Pension Plans
The Company previously offered most of the employees outside the United States participation in a defined benefit pension plan that has been curtailed. In addition, beginning in 2001, the Company offers a Supplemental
54
FLIR SYSTEMS, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
Note 14. Employee Benefit Plans(Continued)
Pension Plans(Continued)
Executive Retirement Plan (the SERP) for certain US executive officers of the Company. A summary of the components of the net periodic pension expense for the benefit obligation and fund assets of the plans is as follows (in thousands):
Year Ended December 31, |
||||||||
2003 |
2002 |
|||||||
Change in benefit obligation: |
||||||||
Projected benefit obligation (PBO) at January 1 |
$ | 7,901 | $ | 4,061 | ||||
Service costs |
1,160 | 600 | ||||||
Interest costs |
539 | 317 | ||||||
Amendments |
| 1,740 | ||||||
Actuarial loss |
165 | 717 | ||||||
Benefits paid |
(139 | ) | (94 | ) | ||||
Foreign currency exchange changes |
747 | 560 | ||||||
Projected benefit obligation at December 31 |
$ | 10,373 | $ | 7,901 | ||||
Fair value of plan assets at January 1 |
$ | | $ | | ||||
Unfunded status |
10,373 | 7,901 | ||||||
Unrecognized net loss |
(969 | ) | (836 | ) | ||||
Unrecognized prior service cost |
(2,280 | ) | (2,467 | ) | ||||
Unrecognized transition obligation |
268 | 253 | ||||||
Pension liability recognized |
$ | 7,392 | $ | 4,851 | ||||
For the defined benefit pension plan for employees outside the United States, weighted average discount rates were assumed to be 5.5% and 5.5% for the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively.
For the SERP, the weighted average discount rate was assumed to be 6.0% and 6.0% and the rate of increase in compensation levels was assumed to be 4.0% and 3.0% for the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively. An additional minimum liability of $2.1 million has been recognized for the SERP representing the excess of the unfunded accumulated benefit obligation over the accrued pension costs. The measurement date used for the SERP is December 31, and at December 31, 2003, the accumulated benefit obligation is $3,890,000. Benefits expected to be paid under the SERP are approximately $270,000 in 2006, $342,000 in 2007, $461,000 in 2008, and an aggregate of $2,303,000 in the fives years thereafter.
Components of net periodic benefit cost are as follows (in thousands):
Year Ended December 31, | |||||||||
2003 |
2002 |
2001 | |||||||
Service costs |
$ | 1,160 | $ | 600 | $ | 283 | |||
Interest costs |
539 | 317 | 216 | ||||||
Net amortization and deferral |
216 | 34 | 40 | ||||||
Net periodic pension costs |
$ | 1,915 | $ | 951 | $ | 539 | |||
55
FLIR SYSTEMS, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
Note 15. Operating Segments and Related Information
Operating Segments
The Company has determined its operating segments to be the Thermography and Imaging market segments. The Thermography market is comprised of a broad range of commercial and industrial applications utilizing infrared cameras to provide precise temperature measurement. The Imaging market is comprised of a broad range of applications that is focused on providing enhanced vision capabilities where temperature measurement is not required, although differences in temperature are used to create an image. The Imaging market also includes high performance daylight imaging applications.
The accounting policies of the segments are the same as those described in Note 1. The Company has historically evaluated performance based upon net revenue for each segment. Beginning in 2002, the Company also began evaluating segment performance on earnings from operations. On a consolidated basis, this amount represents income before interest, other income (net) and taxes as represented in the Consolidated Statement of Operations. The Other segment consists of corporate expenses and certain other operating expenses not allocated to the operating segments for management reporting purposes. Segment earnings from operations in 2001 are not provided as organizational changes arising during these years make such reporting on a consistent basis with 2003 and 2002 impracticable.
Accounts receivable and inventories for operating segments are regularly reviewed by management and are reported below as segment assets. All remaining assets and liabilities, and capital expenditures and depreciation are managed on a Company-wide basis.
Operating segment information is as follows (in thousands):
Year Ended December 31, | |||||||||||
2003 |
2002 |
2001 | |||||||||
Revenue: |
|||||||||||
Imaging |
$ | 193,132 | $ | 167,246 | $ | 122,889 | |||||
Thermography |
118,847 | 93,834 | 91,484 | ||||||||
$ | 311,979 | $ | 261,080 | $ | 214,373 | ||||||
Earnings (loss) from operations: |
|||||||||||
Imaging |
$ | 47,481 | $ | 35,994 | |||||||
Thermography |
37,231 | 27,353 | |||||||||
Other |
(14,886 | ) | (12,816 | ) | |||||||
$ | 69,826 | $ | 50,531 | ||||||||
Segment assets (accounts receivable and inventories): |
|||||||||||
Imaging |
$ | 107,339 | $ | 65,336 | |||||||
Thermography |
47,952 | 40,603 | |||||||||
$ | 155,291 | $ | 105,939 | ||||||||
56
FLIR SYSTEMS, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
Note 15. Operating Segments and Related Information(Continued)
Revenue and Long-Lived Assets by Geographic Area
Information related to revenue by significant geographical location is as follows (in thousands):
Year Ended December 31, | |||||||||
2003 |
2002 |
2001 | |||||||
United States |
$ | 177,066 | $ | 146,247 | $ | 113,683 | |||
Europe |
93,657 | 75,205 | 57,206 | ||||||
Other foreign |
41,256 | 39,628 | 43,484 | ||||||
$ | 311,979 | $ | 261,080 | $ | 214,373 | ||||
Long-lived assets are primarily comprised of net property and equipment and net identifiable intangible assets and goodwill. Long-lived assets by significant geographic locations are as follows (in thousands):
December 31, | ||||||
2003 |
2002 | |||||
United States |
$ | 22,929 | $ | 9,485 | ||
Europe |
24,235 | 24,255 | ||||
$ | 47,164 | $ | 33,740 | |||
Major Customers
Revenue derived from major customers is as follows (in thousands):
Year Ended December 31, | |||||||||
2003 |
2002 |
2001 | |||||||
US government |
$ | 80,850 | $ | 64,436 | $ | 46,541 | |||
Note 16. Acquisition of Optronics Division
On July 13, 2001, the Company acquired certain net assets of the Optronics Division of Saabtech Electronics AB, effective as of July 1, 2001. In connection with the acquisition of Optronics, the Company issued 100,000 shares of its common stock to complete the acquisition. In addition to the net assets acquired, the Company received cash of $0.3 million. The purchase price of $1.4 million, representing the market value of the shares issued, was allocated to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their estimated values with the excess assigned to a cooperation agreement received in the acquisition. The cooperation agreement designates the Company as a preferred supplier to Saab Bofors Dynamics AB.
Note 17. Subsequent Events Acquisition of Indigo Systems Corporation
On October 21, 2003, the Company and Indigo Systems Corporation (Indigo) entered into a Definitive Agreement and Plan of Merger pursuant to which the Company will acquire Indigo. Indigo is a producer of infrared detectors and infrared camera subsystems and cameras. The transaction is valued, excluding acquisition related costs, at approximately $190 million and was closed on January 6, 2004 with Indigo security holders receiving cash consideration of approximately $165 million, and all outstanding Indigo stock options being converted into approximately 710,000 options to purchase FLIR stock. The Company is in process of determining the allocation of the purchase price and will include all impacts of such allocation in its reporting for its first quarter of 2004.
57
QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA (UNAUDITED)
FLIR SYSTEMS, INC.
(In thousands, except per share data)
Q1 |
Q2 |
Q3 |
Q4 | |||||||||
2003 |
||||||||||||
Revenue |
$ | 69,171 | $ | 75,162 | $ | 70,232 | $ | 97,414 | ||||
Gross profit |
36,043 | 39,121 | 38,991 | 51,370 | ||||||||
Net earnings |
$ | 9,150 | $ | 9,715 | $ | 10,865 | $ | 14,963 | ||||
Net earnings per share: |
||||||||||||
Basic |
$ | 0.26 | $ | 0.28 | $ | 0.33 | $ | 0.46 | ||||
Diluted |
$ | 0.25 | $ | 0.27 | $ | 0.32 | $ | 0.44 | ||||
Q1 |
Q2 |
Q3 |
Q4 | |||||||||
2002 |
||||||||||||
Revenue |
$ | 58,098 | $ | 63,595 | $ | 64,455 | $ | 74,932 | ||||
Gross profit |
31,299 | 32,818 | 33,823 | 39,080 | ||||||||
Net earnings |
$ | 8,668 | $ | 9,557 | $ | 10,650 | $ | 12,684 | ||||
Net earnings per share: |
||||||||||||
Basic |
$ | 0.26 | $ | 0.28 | $ | 0.32 | $ | 0.37 | ||||
Diluted |
$ | 0.24 | $ | 0.27 | $ | 0.30 | $ | 0.35 |
On May 29, 2003, the Company effected a two-for-one split for each share of common stock outstanding on May 12, 2003. The Company issued approximately 17.5 million shares of common stock as a result of the stock split. The Companys per share amounts of common stock have been restated to reflect the stock split for all periods presented.
The sum of the quarterly earnings per share does not always equal the annual earnings per share as a result of the computation of quarterly versus annual average shares outstanding.
58
ITEM 9. | CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE |
On May 20, 2002, FLIR Systems, Inc. (the Company) dismissed Arthur Andersen LLP (Andersen) as its independent auditors. This action was approved by the Board of Directors and the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors. The audit reports of Andersen on the consolidated financial statements of the Company and its subsidiaries as of and for the years ended December 31, 2000 and 2001 did not contain any adverse opinion, disclaimer of opinion or qualification as to uncertainty, audit scope or accounting principles. During the two years ended December 31, 2000 and 2001, and the subsequent interim period through May 20, 2002, there were no disagreements with Andersen on any matter of accounting principle or practice, financial statement disclosure or auditing scope or procedure, which disagreements, if not resolved to the satisfaction of Andersen, would have caused them to make a reference to the subject matter of the disagreement in connection with their reports; and there were no reportable events as defined in Item 304(a)(1)(v) of Regulation S-K.
On May 20, 2002, the Company engaged KPMG LLP (KPMG) as its new independent auditors. The decision to change accounting firms was approved by the Companys Board of Directors and the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors. During the years ended December 31, 2000 and 2001, and the subsequent interim period through May 20, 2002, the Company did not consult with KPMG regarding the application of accounting principles to any specified transaction, either completed or proposed, or the type of audit opinion that might be rendered on the Companys financial statements, or any other matters or reportable events as set forth in Items 304(a)(2)(i) and (ii) of Regulation S-K.
ITEM 9A. | CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES |
As of December 31, 2003, the Company carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of the Companys management, including the Companys Chief Executive Officer and the Companys Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures. Based on the evaluation, the Companys Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that the Companys disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports it files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in Securities and Exchange Commission rules and forms. There were no significant changes in the Companys internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect these controls including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses subsequent to the date the Company completed its evaluation.
ITEM 10. | DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT |
Information with respect to directors and executive officers of the Company is included under Election of Directors, Management and Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance in the Companys definitive proxy statement for its 2004 Annual Meeting of Shareholders and is incorporated herein by reference.
The Company has adopted a Code of Ethics that applies to the Companys Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Controller and persons performing similar duties. A copy of the Code of Ethics is attached as an Exhibit to this Report.
ITEM 11. | EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION |
Information with respect to executive compensation is included under Executive Compensation in the Companys definitive proxy statement for its 2004 Annual Meeting of Shareholders and is incorporated herein by reference.
59
ITEM 12. | SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS |
Information with respect to security ownership of certain beneficial owners and management is included under Stock Owned by Management and Principal Shareholders in the Companys definitive proxy statement for its 2004 Annual Meeting of Shareholders and is incorporated herein by reference. Information with respect to equity compensation plans is included under Equity Compensation Plan Information in the Companys definitive proxy statement for its 2004 Annual Meeting of Shareholders and is incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 13. | CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS |
Information with respect to certain relationships and related transactions is included under Certain Relationships and Related Transactions in the Companys definitive proxy statement for its 2004 Annual Meeting of Shareholders and is incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 14. | PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES |
Information with respect to principal accountant fees and services is included under Fees Paid to KPMG LLP in the Companys definitive proxy statement for its 2004 Annual Meeting of Shareholders and is incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 15. | EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K |
(a)(1) Financial Statements
The financial statements are included in Item 8 above.
(a)(2) Financial Statement Schedules
The following schedule is filed as part of this Report:
Schedule IIValuation and Qualifying Accounts
Report of Independent Auditors on Financial Statement Schedule
No other schedules are included because the required information is inapplicable, not required or are presented in the financial statements or the related notes thereto.
(a)(3) Exhibits
Number |
Description | |
2.1 | Merger Agreement dated as of March 19, 1999 by and among FLIR Systems, Inc., Inframetrics, Inc., Irabu Acquisition Corporation and the shareholders of Inframetrics, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 14, 1999). | |
2.2 | Agreement and Plan of Merger and Reorganization, dated as of October 21, 2003 by and among FLIR Systems, Inc., Indigo Systems Corporation, Fiji Sub, Inc., and William Parrish, as Shareholders Agent (incorporated by reference to Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 15, 2004). | |
3.1 | Second Restated Articles of Incorporation of the FLIR Systems, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 33-62582)). | |
3.2 | First Amendment to Second Restated Articles of Incorporation of FLIR Systems, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 1.1 to Registration Statement on Form 8-A filed on June 11, 1999). | |
3.3 | First Restated Bylaws of the FLIR Systems, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 33-62582)). | |
3.4 | Second Amendment to Second Restated Articles of Incorporation of FLIR Systems, Inc (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on August 8, 2003). |
60
Number |
Description | |
4.1 | Rights Agreement dated as of June 2, 1999 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 1.1 to the Registration Statement on Form 8-A filed on June 11, 1999). | |
4.2 | Indenture between FLIR Systems, Inc. and J.P. Morgan Trust Company N.A. dated June 11, 2003 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Quarterly Report filed on August 8, 2003). | |
4.3 | Amendment No. 1 to Rights Agreement between FLIR Systems, Inc. and Mellon Investor Services LLC dated June 5, 2003 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the Quarterly Report filed on August 8, 2003). | |
4.4 | Form of $175,000,000 3% Senior Convertible Notes Due 2023 dated June 11, 2003 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to the Quarterly Report filed on August 8, 2003). | |
4.5 | Form of $35,000,000 3% Senior Convertible Notes Due 2023 dated June 17, 2003 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4 to the Quarterly Report filed on August 8, 2003). | |
4.6 | Resale Registration Rights Agreement dated June 11, 2003 among FLIR Systems, Inc., J.P. Morgan Securities Inc., and Banc of America Securities LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.5 to the Quarterly Report filed on August 8, 2003). | |
10.1 | Form of Indemnity Agreement between the FLIR Systems, Inc. and each member of its Board of Directors (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 33-62582)).(1) | |
10.2 | 1992 Stock Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 33-62582)).(1) | |
10.3 | 1993 Stock Option Plan for Non-employee Directors (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 33-62582)).(1) | |
10.4 | Lease Dated February 11, 1985, as amended, by and among the FLIR Systems, Inc. and Pacific Realty Association, L.P. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 33-62582)). | |
10.5 | Combination Agreement, Dated October 6, 1997, Among FLIR Systems, Inc., Spectra-Physics AB, Spectra-Physics Holding S.A., Spectra-Physics Holdings GmbH, Spectra-Physics Holdings PLC, and Pharos Holdings, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.0 to Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 24, 1997). | |
10.6 | Registration Rights Agreement dated as of December 1, 1997 by and among FLIR Systems, Inc., Spectra-Physics AB, Spectra-Physics Holdings PLC and Pharos Holdings (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 15, 1997). | |
10.7 | Inframetrics, Inc. Shareholders Agreement dated as of March 19, 1999 by and among FLIR, Inframetrics and the shareholders of Inframetrics (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 14, 1999). | |
10.8 | Amendment to Inframetrics, Inc. Shareholders Agreement dated as of October 27, 1999 by and among FLIR, Inframetrics, and the former shareholders of Inframetrics (incorporated by reference to Exhibits to Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-90717)). | |
10.9 | FLIR Systems, Inc. 1999 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit A to the Companys Proxy Statement dated April 30, 1999).(1) | |
10.10 | Form of Change in Control Agreement dated as of May 8, 2001 (Earl R. Lewis, Arne Almerfors, Stephen M. Bailey, James A. Fitzhenry, Daniel L. Manitakos, William A. Sundermeier, Andrew C. Teich, and Detlev H. Suderow)(incorporated by reference to Exhibits to Form 10-K filed on March 12, 2002).(1) | |
10.11 | FLIR Systems, Inc. Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan)(incorporated by reference to Exhibits to Form 10-K filed on March 12, 2002).(1) | |
10.12 | Credit Agreement among FLIR Systems, Inc. and Bank of America N.A. and certain other financial institutions dated March 22, 2002 (incorporated by reference to Exhibits to Form 10-Q filed on April 24, 2002). |
61
Number |
Description | |
10.13 | FLIR Systems, Inc. 2002 Stock Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibits to Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-102992). | |
10.14 | Amended and Restated 1999 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, amended as of June 4, 2002 (incorporated by reference to Exhibits to Form 10-Q filed August 6, 2002).(1) | |
10.15 | Amendment dated December 19, 2000 to lease dated February 11, 1985 by and among FLIR Systems, Inc. and Pacific Realty Association, L.P. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.16 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on March 10, 2003). | |
10.16 | Contract for the Supply of Uncooled Imaging Modules, dated July 4, 2002. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.16 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on March 10, 2003).(2) | |
10.17 | Purchase Agreement among FLIR Systems, Inc. and J.P. Morgan Securities Inc. and Banc of America Securities LLC dated June 6, 2003 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on August 8, 2003). | |
10.18 | First Amendment to the Credit Agreement among FLIR Systems, Inc. and Bank of America N.A. and certain other financial institutions dated June 5, 2003 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on August 8, 2003). | |
10.19 | Letter of consent from Bank of America N.A. dated June 6, 2003 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on August 8, 2003). | |
10.20 | Executive Employment Agreement dated as of January 1, 2004 between FLIR Systems, Inc. and Earl R. Lewis.(1) | |
14.1 | Code of Ethics for Senior Financial Officers. | |
21.0 | Subsidiaries of FLIR Systems, Inc. | |
23.0 | Consent of KPMG LLP. | |
31.1 | Principal Executive Officer Certification Pursuant to Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, Section 302. | |
31.2 | Principal Financial Officer Certification Pursuant to Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, Section 302. | |
32.1 | Certification by the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | |
32.2 | Certification by the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
(1) | This exhibit constitutes a management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement. |
(2) | Portions of this Exhibit have been omitted pursuant to a request for confidential treatment under 17 C.F.R. (s) 240.24b 2. |
(b) During the quarter ended December 31, 2003, the Company filed the following reports on Form 8-K:
1. | The Company filed a current report on Form 8-K, dated October 22, 2003, reporting under Item 7 and Item 12 on the issuance of a press release announcing (i) its financial results for the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2003, and (ii) its expectations as to revenue and net income for the year ending December 31, 2003. |
2. | The Company filed a current report on Form 8-K, dated October 22, 2003, reporting under Item 5 and Item 7 on the issuance of a press release announcing that the Company had signed a definitive agreement to acquire Indigo Systems Corporation. |
3. | The Company filed a current report on Form 8-K, dated December 18, 2003, reporting under Item 5 and Item 7 on the issuance of a press release announcing that the Company had received clearance under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976, as amended, for the acquisition of Indigo Systems Corporation. |
62
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized on the 4th day of March 2004.
FLIR SYSTEMS, INC. | ||
(Registrant) | ||
By: |
/s/ STEPHEN M. BAILEY | |
Stephen M. Bailey | ||
Sr. Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Accounting and Financial Officer and Duly Authorized Officer) |
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities indicated on March 4, 2004.
Signature |
Title | |
/s/ EARL R. LEWIS Earl R. Lewis |
Chairman of the Board of Directors, President and | |
/s/ JOHN C. HART John C. Hart |
Director | |
/s/ ANGUS L. MACDONALD Angus L. Macdonald |
Director | |
/s/ MICHAEL T. SMITH Michael T. Smith |
Director | |
/s/ RONALD L. TURNER Ronald L. Turner |
Director | |
/s/ STEVEN E. WYNNE Steven E. Wynne |
Director | |
/s/ JOHN D. CARTER John D. Carter |
Director |
63
SCHEDULE II
FLIR SYSTEMS, INC.
VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
(in thousands)
Column A |
Column B |
Column C |
Column D |
Column E | ||||||||||||
Balance at Beginning of the Year |
Additions |
Deductions Described |
Balance at the End of the Year | |||||||||||||
Charges to Costs and Expenses |
Charged to Other Accounts Described |
|||||||||||||||
Year ended December 31, 2003 |
$ | 1,445 | $ | 5 | $ | 0 | $ | (132 | )(1) | $ | 1,318 | |||||
Year ended December 31, 2002 |
$ | 1,948 | $ | 54 | $ | 0 | $ | (557 | )(1) | $ | 1,445 | |||||
Year ended December 31, 2001 |
$ | 2,608 | $ | 385 | $ | 0 | $ | (1,045 | )(2) | $ | 1,948 | |||||
(1) | Deductions represent write-offs, net of recoveries. |
(2) | Deductions include write-offs, net of recoveries of $545 and $500 that have been applied to certain non-trade receivables. |
64
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS REPORT ON FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULE
To the Board of Directors of
FLIR Systems, Inc.:
Under date of February 2, 2004, we reported on the consolidated balance sheets of FLIR Systems, Inc. (an Oregon corporation) and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2003 and 2002, and the related consolidated statements of operations, shareholders equity, and cash flows for the years then ended, which is included in this Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003. In connection with our audits of the aforementioned consolidated financial statements, we also audited the related consolidated financial statement schedule in this Form 10-K for the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2002. This financial statement schedule is the responsibility of the Companys management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit.
In our opinion, such financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth herein.
Our report refers to our audit of the transitional disclosures required by Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets (SFAS 142), as more fully described in Note 5 to the consolidated financial statements. However, we were not engaged to audit, review or apply any procedures to the 2001 and 2002 consolidated financial statements other than with respect to such disclosures.
/s/ KPMG LLP
Portland, Oregon
February 2, 2004
65
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS ON
FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULE
To the Board of Directors of
FLIR Systems, Inc.:
We have audited in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards, the consolidated financial statements, as of and for the years ended December 31, 2001 and 2000 included in FLIR Systems, Inc. and subsidiaries Form 10-K, and have issued our report thereon dated February 8, 2002. Our audit was made for the purpose of forming an opinion on those statements taken as a whole. The Valuation and Qualifying Accounts Schedule is the responsibility of the Companys management and is presented for purposes of complying with the Securities and Exchange Commissions rules and is not part of the basic financial statements. The Valuation and Qualifying Accounts Schedule for the years ended December 31, 2001 and 2000 has been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audit of the basic financial statements and, in our opinion, fairly states in all material respects the financial data required to be set forth therein in relation to the basic financial statement taken as a whole.
/s/ ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP
Portland, Oregon
February 8, 2002
THIS IS A COPY OF THE REPORT PREVIOUSLY ISSUED BY ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP. THIS REPORT HAS NOT BEEN REISSUED BY ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP.
ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP WERE THE INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS FOR FLIR SYSTEMS INC. UNTIL MAY 20, 2002. REPRESENTATIVES OF ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP ARE NOT AVAILABLE TO PROVIDE THE CONSENT REQUIRED FOR THE INCORPORATION BY REFERENCE OF THEIR REPORT ON THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF FLIR SYSTEMS, INC. APPEARING IN THIS ANNUAL REPORT INTO REGISTRATION STATEMENTS FILED BY FLIR SYSTEMS, INC. WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION AND CURRENTLY EFFECTIVE UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933. BECAUSE ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP HAVE NOT CONSENTED TO THE INCORPORATION BY REFERENCE OF THEIR REPORT, INVESTORS WILL NOT BE ABLE TO RECOVER AGAINST ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP UNDER SECTION 11 OF THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933 FOR ANY UNTRUE STATEMENTS OF A MATERIAL FACT CONTAINED IN THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AUDITED BY ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP THAT ARE CONTAINED IN THIS REPORT OR ANY OMISSIONS TO STATE A MATERIAL FACT REQUIRED TO BE STATED THEREIN.
THE PRIOR PERIOD FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR 2001 AND 2000 HAVE BEEN REVISED TO INCLUDE THE TRANSITIONAL DISCLOSURES REQUIRED BY STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING STANDARDS NO. 142, GOODWILL AND OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS, WHICH WAS ADOPTED BY THE COMPANY ON JANUARY 1, 2002.
66