UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended December 31, 2003
Commission file number 001-16317
CONTANGO OIL & GAS COMPANY
(Exact name of small business issuer as specified in its charter)
DELAWARE | 95-4079863 | |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |
(IRS Employer Identification No.) |
3700 BUFFALO SPEEDWAY, SUITE 960
HOUSTON, TEXAS 77098
(Address of principal executive offices)
(713) 960-1901
(Issuers telephone number)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No x
The total number of shares of common stock, par value $0.04 per share, outstanding as of February 13, 2004 was 12,086,690.
CONTANGO OIL & GAS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q
FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2003
Page | ||||
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION | ||||
Item 1. |
Consolidated Financial Statements |
|||
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2003 and June 30, 2003 |
3 | |||
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three and six months ended December 31, 2003 and 2002 |
5 | |||
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the six months ended December 31, 2003 and 2002 |
6 | |||
Consolidated Statement of Shareholders Equity for the six months ended December 31, 2003 and 2002 |
7 | |||
8 | ||||
Item 2. |
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations | 16 | ||
Item 3. |
37 | |||
Item 4. |
37 | |||
PART II OTHER INFORMATION | ||||
Item 1. |
37 | |||
Item 2. |
37 | |||
Item 3. |
38 | |||
Item 4. |
38 | |||
Item 5. |
38 | |||
Item 6. |
38 |
All references in this Form 10-Q to the Company, Contango, we, us or our are to Contango Oil & Gas Company and Subsidiaries. Unless otherwise noted, all information in this Form 10-Q relating to natural gas and oil reserves and the estimated future net cash flows attributable to those reserves are based on estimates prepared by independent engineers and are net to our interest.
WEBSITE ACCESS TO REPORTS
General information about us can be found on our Website at www.mcfx.biz. Our annual reports on Form 10-KSB, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, Form 10-QSB and current reports on Form 8-K, as well as any amendments and exhibits to those reports, are available free of charge through our Website as soon as reasonably practicable after we file or furnish them to the Securities and Exchange Commission.
2
CONTANGO OIL & GAS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
ASSETS
December 31, 2003 |
June 30, 2003 |
|||||||
(Unaudited) | ||||||||
CURRENT ASSETS: |
||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 1,239,348 | $ | 219,242 | ||||
Accounts receivable, net |
4,076,806 | 6,039,779 | ||||||
Marketable equity securities |
| 676,500 | ||||||
Other |
110,734 | 96,115 | ||||||
Total current assets |
5,426,888 | 7,031,636 | ||||||
PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT: |
||||||||
Natural gas and oil properties, successful efforts method of accounting: |
||||||||
Proved properties |
53,139,452 | 55,125,109 | ||||||
Unproved properties, not being amortized |
3,277,667 | 3,065,188 | ||||||
Furniture and equipment |
130,524 | 126,388 | ||||||
Accumulated depreciation, depletion and amortization |
(24,702,499 | ) | (21,574,673 | ) | ||||
Total property, plant and equipment, net |
31,845,144 | 36,742,012 | ||||||
OTHER ASSETS: |
||||||||
Cash and other assets held by affiliates |
3,022,001 | 784,656 | ||||||
Investment in Freeport LNG Project |
1,450,000 | 850,000 | ||||||
Investment in partnership |
| 72,500 | ||||||
Deferred income tax asset |
1,478,270 | 568,024 | ||||||
Facility fee |
146,438 | 177,500 | ||||||
Other assets |
82,121 | 78,612 | ||||||
Total other assets |
6,178,830 | 2,531,292 | ||||||
TOTAL ASSETS |
$ | 43,450,862 | $ | 46,304,940 | ||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
3
CONTANGO OIL & GAS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
December 31, 2003 |
June 30, 2003 |
|||||||
(Unaudited) | ||||||||
CURRENT LIABILITIES: |
||||||||
Accounts payable |
$ | 582,243 | $ | 681,425 | ||||
Accrued exploration and development |
1,042,372 | 1,011,098 | ||||||
Income taxes payable |
2,719,897 | 734,312 | ||||||
Price hedge contracts |
| 58,171 | ||||||
Short term hedge payable |
| 102,486 | ||||||
Other accrued liabilities |
411,802 | 229,937 | ||||||
Current portion of long-term debt |
| 5,890,000 | ||||||
Total current liabilities |
4,756,314 | 8,707,429 | ||||||
LONG-TERM DEBT |
3,606,900 | 16,460,000 | ||||||
ASSET RETIREMENT OBLIGATION |
190,400 | 191,664 | ||||||
DEFERRED CREDITS |
| 208,333 | ||||||
SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY: |
||||||||
Convertible preferred stock, 8%, Series A, $0.04 par value, 5,000 shares authorized, 2,500 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2003 and June 30, 2003, liquidation preference of $1,000 per share |
100 | 100 | ||||||
Convertible preferred stock, 8%, Series B, $0.04 par value, 10,000 shares authorized, 5,000 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2003 and June 30, 2003, liquidation preference of $1,000 per share |
200 | 200 | ||||||
Convertible preferred stock, 6%, Series C, $0.04 par value, 4,000 shares authorized, 1,600 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2003, liquidation preference of $5,000 per share, and 0 shares issued and outstanding at June 30, 2003 |
64 | | ||||||
Common stock, $0.04 par value, 50,000,000 shares authorized, 12,013,509 shares issued and 9,438,509 outstanding at December 31, 2003, 11,871,076 shares issued and 9,296,076 outstanding at June 30, 2003 |
478,299 | 473,399 | ||||||
Additional paid-in capital |
28,937,627 | 21,803,090 | ||||||
Treasury stock at cost (2,575,000 shares) |
(6,180,000 | ) | (6,180,000 | ) | ||||
Retained earnings |
11,660,958 | 4,640,725 | ||||||
Total shareholders equity |
34,897,248 | 20,737,514 | ||||||
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY |
$ | 43,450,862 | $ | 46,304,940 | ||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
4
CONTANGO OIL & GAS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)
Three Months Ended December 31, |
Six Months Ended December 31, |
|||||||||||||||
2003 |
2002 |
2003 |
2002 |
|||||||||||||
REVENUES: |
||||||||||||||||
Natural gas and oil sales |
$ | 5,980,308 | $ | 7,714,265 | $ | 14,232,812 | $ | 14,731,758 | ||||||||
Gain (loss) from hedging activities |
(24,071 | ) | (192,970 | ) | 58,171 | (186,326 | ) | |||||||||
Total revenues |
5,956,237 | 7,521,295 | 14,290,983 | 14,545,432 | ||||||||||||
EXPENSES: |
||||||||||||||||
Operating expenses |
916,685 | 1,671,028 | 2,568,914 | 2,730,799 | ||||||||||||
Exploration expenses |
2,131,885 | 9,368,212 | 3,487,998 | 11,908,144 | ||||||||||||
Depreciation, depletion and amortization |
1,618,899 | 2,187,751 | 3,412,735 | 4,576,510 | ||||||||||||
Impairment of natural gas and oil properties |
42,995 | | 42,995 | | ||||||||||||
General and administrative expenses |
768,473 | 659,751 | 1,145,580 | 1,073,093 | ||||||||||||
Total expenses |
5,478,937 | 13,886,742 | 10,658,222 | 20,288,546 | ||||||||||||
INCOME (LOSS) FROM OPERATIONS |
477,300 | (6,365,447 | ) | 3,632,761 | (5,743,114 | ) | ||||||||||
Interest expense |
(115,235 | ) | (169,583 | ) | (279,645 | ) | (353,903 | ) | ||||||||
Interest income |
5,250 | 9,903 | 19,666 | 21,165 | ||||||||||||
Gain on sale of marketable securities |
65,023 | | 710,322 | | ||||||||||||
Gain on sale of assets and other |
6,061,805 | | 7,116,410 | 36,150 | ||||||||||||
INCOME (LOSS) BEFORE INCOME TAXES |
6,494,143 | (6,525,127 | ) | 11,199,514 | (6,039,702 | ) | ||||||||||
(Provision) benefit for income taxes |
(2,205,734 | ) | 2,230,807 | (3,852,614 | ) | 2,112,250 | ||||||||||
NET INCOME (LOSS) |
4,288,409 | (4,294,320 | ) | 7,346,900 | (3,927,452 | ) | ||||||||||
Preferred stock dividends |
176,667 | 150,000 | 326,667 | 300,000 | ||||||||||||
NET INCOME (LOSS) ATTRIBUTABLE TO COMMON STOCK |
$ | 4,111,742 | $ | (4,444,320 | ) | $ | 7,020,233 | $ | (4,227,452 | ) | ||||||
NET INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE: |
||||||||||||||||
Basic |
$ | 0.44 | $ | (0.49 | ) | $ | 0.75 | $ | (0.47 | ) | ||||||
Diluted |
$ | 0.33 | $ | (0.49 | ) | $ | 0.58 | $ | (0.47 | ) | ||||||
WEIGHTED AVERAGE COMMON SHARES OUTSTANDING: |
||||||||||||||||
Basic |
9,366,423 | 9,043,282 | 9,332,547 | 9,043,282 | ||||||||||||
Diluted |
12,936,563 | 9,043,282 | 12,641,092 | 9,043,282 | ||||||||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
5
CONTANGO OIL & GAS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
Six Months Ended December 31, |
||||||||
2003 |
2002 |
|||||||
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES: |
||||||||
Net (loss) income |
$ | 7,346,900 | $ | (3,927,452 | ) | |||
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities: |
||||||||
Depreciation, depletion and amortization |
3,412,735 | 4,576,510 | ||||||
Impairment of natural gas and oil properties |
42,995 | | ||||||
Exploration expenditures |
2,619,443 | 4,468,481 | ||||||
Increase in deferred income taxes |
(910,246 | ) | (3,895,281 | ) | ||||
Gain on sale of assets and other |
(7,826,732 | ) | (36,150 | ) | ||||
Unrealized hedging gain |
(58,171 | ) | (885,561 | ) | ||||
Stock-based compensation |
77,383 | 53,027 | ||||||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: |
||||||||
Decrease in accounts receivable and other |
1,962,973 | 453,956 | ||||||
Increase (decrease) in prepaid insurance |
(45,225 | ) | 164,912 | |||||
(Decrease) in accounts payable |
(410,001 | ) | (719,156 | ) | ||||
(Decrease) increase in other accrued liabilities |
425,364 | (825,622 | ) | |||||
(Decrease) increase in income taxes payable |
1,985,585 | (422,757 | ) | |||||
Other |
91,187 | (26,192 | ) | |||||
Net cash provided (used) by operating activities |
8,714,190 | (1,021,285 | ) | |||||
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES: |
||||||||
Natural gas and oil exploration and development expenditures |
(2,651,205 | ) | (226,640 | ) | ||||
(Increase) decrease in cash and other assets held by affiliates |
(1,358,785 | ) | 950,000 | |||||
Investment in Freeport LNG Project |
(600,000 | ) | | |||||
Additions to furniture and equipment |
(4,136 | ) | (16,238 | ) | ||||
(Increase) decrease in advances to operators |
(207,979 | ) | 597,294 | |||||
Purchase of proved producing reserves |
| (2,602,585 | ) | |||||
Purchase of marketable equity securities |
(375,000 | ) | | |||||
Proceeds from sales of marketable equity securities |
1,761,822 | | ||||||
Sales costs |
(5,281 | ) | | |||||
Proceeds from the sale of assets |
7,747,464 | | ||||||
Net cash (used) provided in investing activities |
4,306,900 | (1,298,169 | ) | |||||
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES: |
||||||||
Borrowings under credit facility |
9,582,000 | 10,625,000 | ||||||
Repayments under credit facility |
(28,325,100 | ) | (10,200,000 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from equity issuances |
7,799,614 | | ||||||
Preferred stock dividends |
(300,000 | ) | (300,000 | ) | ||||
Repurchase/cancellation of stock options and warrants |
(757,498 | ) | | |||||
Debt issue costs |
| (41,250 | ) | |||||
Net cash (used) provided in financing activities |
(12,000,984 | ) | 83,750 | |||||
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS |
1,020,106 | (2,235,704 | ) | |||||
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, BEGINNING OF PERIOD |
219,242 | 2,726,845 | ||||||
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, END OF PERIOD |
$ | 1,239,348 | $ | 491,141 | ||||
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION: |
||||||||
Cash paid for taxes |
$ | 2,471,184 | $ | 2,205,788 | ||||
Cash paid for interest |
$ | 269,093 | $ | 306,958 | ||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
6
CONTANGO OIL & GAS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
(Unaudited)
For the Three and Six Months Ended December 31, 2002 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Preferred Stock |
Common Stock |
Paid-in Capital |
Treasury Stock |
Retained Earnings |
Total Shareholders Equity |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Shares |
Amount |
Shares |
Amount |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at June 30, 2002 |
7,500 | $ | 300 | 9,043,282 | $ | 464,732 | $ | 21,236,701 | $ | (6,180,000 | ) | $ | 9,576,750 | $ | 25,098,483 | |||||||||||
Expense of stock options |
| | | | 21,083 | | | 21,083 | ||||||||||||||||||
Net income |
| | | | | | 366,868 | 366,868 | ||||||||||||||||||
Preferred stock dividends |
| | | | | | (150,000 | ) | (150,000 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Balance at September 30, 2002 |
7,500 | 300 | 9,043,282 | 464,732 | 21,257,784 | (6,180,000 | ) | 9,793,618 | 25,336,434 | |||||||||||||||||
Expense of stock options |
| | | | 31,944 | | | 31,944 | ||||||||||||||||||
Cashless exercise of stock options |
| | 9,595 | | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Net loss |
| | | | | | (4,294,320 | ) | (4,294,320 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Preferred stock dividends |
| | | | | | (150,000 | ) | (150,000 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Balance at December 31, 2002 |
7,500 | $ | 300 | 9,052,877 | $ | 464,732 | $ | 21,289,728 | $ | (6,180,000 | ) | $ | 5,349,298 | $ | 20,924,058 | |||||||||||
For the Three and Six Months Ended December 31, 2003 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Preferred Stock |
Common Stock |
Paid-in Capital |
Treasury Stock |
Retained Earnings |
Total Shareholders Equity |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Shares |
Amount |
Shares |
Amount |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at June 30, 2003 |
7,500 | $ | 300 | 9,296,076 | $ | 473,399 | $ | 21,803,090 | $ | (6,180,000 | ) | $ | 4,640,725 | $ | 20,737,514 | |||||||||||
Exercise of stock options |
| | 3,750 | 150 | 7,350 | | | 7,500 | ||||||||||||||||||
Tax benefit from exercise of stock options |
| | | | 3,373 | | | 3,373 | ||||||||||||||||||
Cashless exercise of stock options |
| | 1,866 | | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Expense of stock options |
| | | | 27,034 | | | 27,034 | ||||||||||||||||||
Repurchase/cancellation of stock options and warrants |
| | | | (757,498 | ) | | | (757,498 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Net income |
| | | | | | 3,058,491 | 3,058,491 | ||||||||||||||||||
Preferred stock dividends |
| | | | | | (150,000 | ) | (150,000 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Balance at September 30, 2003 |
7,500 | 300 | 9,301,692 | 473,549 | 21,083,349 | (6,180,000 | ) | 7,549,216 | 22,926,414 | |||||||||||||||||
Exercise of stock options |
| | 118,750 | 4,750 | 232,750 | | | 237,500 | ||||||||||||||||||
Tax benefit from exercise of stock options |
| | | | 16,629 | | | 16,629 | ||||||||||||||||||
Cashless exercise of stock options |
| | 18,067 | | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Issuance of Series C preferred stock |
1,600 | 64 | | | 7,554,550 | | | 7,554,614 | ||||||||||||||||||
Expense of stock options |
| | | | 50,349 | | | 50,349 | ||||||||||||||||||
Net income |
| | | | | | 4,288,409 | 4,288,409 | ||||||||||||||||||
Preferred stock dividends |
| | | | | | (176,667 | ) | (176,667 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Balance at December 31, 2003 |
9,100 | $ | 364 | 9,438,509 | $ | 478,299 | $ | 28,937,627 | $ | (6,180,000 | ) | $ | 11,660,958 | $ | 34,897,248 | |||||||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
7
CONTANGO OIL & GAS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States for interim financial information and pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Accordingly, they do not include all the information and footnotes required by generally accepted accounting principles for complete annual financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. All such adjustments are of a normal recurring nature. The financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited financial statements and notes included in Contango Oil & Gas Companys (Contango or the Company) Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2003. The results of operations for the three and six months ended December 31, 2003 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2004.
1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
The application of generally accepted accounting principles involves certain assumptions, judgments, choices and estimates that affect reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses. Thus, the application of these principles can result in varying results from company to company. Contangos critical accounting principles, which are described below, relate to the successful efforts method for costs related to natural gas and oil activities, consolidation principles, accounting for financial instruments and stock options.
Successful Efforts Method of Accounting. The Company follows the successful efforts method of accounting for its natural gas and oil activities. Under the successful efforts method, lease acquisition costs and all development costs are capitalized. Unproved properties are reviewed quarterly to determine if there has been impairment of the carrying value, and any such impairment is charged to expense in the period. Exploratory drilling costs are capitalized until the results are determined. If proved reserves are not discovered, the exploratory drilling costs are expensed. Other exploratory costs, such as seismic costs and other geological and geophysical expenses, are expensed as incurred. The provision for depreciation, depletion and amortization is based on the capitalized costs as determined above. Depreciation, depletion and amortization is on a cost center by cost center basis using the unit of production method, with lease acquisition costs amortized over total proved reserves and other costs amortized over proved developed reserves.
When circumstances indicate that proved properties may be impaired, the Company compares expected undiscounted future cash flows on a cost center basis to the unamortized capitalized cost of the asset. If the future undiscounted cash flows, based on the Companys estimate of future natural gas and oil prices and operating costs and anticipated production from proved reserves, are lower than the unamortized capitalized cost, then the capitalized cost is reduced to fair market value.
On July 1, 2003, the Company changed its accounting policy for amortizing and impairing the Companys natural gas and oil properties from a well-by-well cost center basis to a field-by-field cost center basis. Management believes the newly adopted policy is preferable in the circumstances to have greater comparability with other successful efforts natural gas and oil companies by conforming to predominant industry practice. In addition, the field level is consistent with the Companys operational and strategic assessment of its natural gas and oil investments. The Company determined that the cumulative effect of the change in accordance with APB Opinion No. 20 was immaterial to the consolidated financial statements.
8
CONTANGO OIL & GAS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Principles of Consolidation. The Companys consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Contango Oil & Gas Company and its subsidiaries and affiliates, after elimination of all intercompany balances and transactions. Wholly owned subsidiaries are fully consolidated. Subsidiaries not wholly owned, such as 33.3% owned Republic Exploration LLC (Republic Exploration), 50.0% owned Magnolia Offshore Exploration LLC (Magnolia Offshore Exploration) and 66.7% owned Contango Offshore Exploration LLC (Contango Offshore Exploration) are not controlled by the Company and are proportionately consolidated. By agreement, Republic Exploration, Magnolia Offshore Exploration and Contango Offshore Exploration have disproportionate allocations of their profits and losses among the owners. Accordingly, the Company determines its income or losses from the ventures based on a hypothetical liquidation determination of how increases or decreases in the book value of the ventures net assets will ultimately affect the cash payments to the Company in the event of dissolution.
During the quarter ended December 31, 2002, both Republic Exploration and Magnolia Offshore Exploration completed exploration activities to fully expend the Companys initial cash contributions to the ventures thereby triggering a change in profit and loss allocations. This triggering event earned the other partners in Republic Exploration and Magnolia Offshore Exploration the right to receive their proportionate share of the Companys initial investment in Republic Exploration and Magnolia Offshore Exploration. As such, the Company proportionately consolidated 33.3% of Republic Explorations and 50.0% of Magnolia Offshore Explorations net assets as of December 31, 2002, as opposed to 100% of each ventures net assets as of September 30, 2002. The reduction of the Companys ownership in the net assets of Republic Exploration and Magnolia Offshore Exploration resulted in a non-cash exploration expense of approximately $4.2 million and approximately $200,000, respectively. The Companys cash contributions to Contango Offshore Exploration during the quarter ended December 31, 2002 that were expended for geological and geophysical data resulted in an approximate $4.1 million exploration expense. The Companys proportionate share of the ventures cash balances is classified as other long-term assets since it is expected those funds will be expended for their intended purposes.
By agreement, since the Company was the only owner that contributed cash to Republic Exploration and Magnolia Offshore Exploration, the Company consolidated 100% of the ventures net assets and results of operations until the ventures expended all of the Companys initial cash contributions. Subsequent to that event, the owners share in the net assets of the ventures is based on their stated ownership percentages. By agreement, the owners in Contango Offshore Exploration immediately share in the net assets of Contango Offshore Exploration, including the initial Company cash contribution, based on their stated ownership percentages. The other owners of Republic Exploration, Magnolia Offshore Exploration and Contango Offshore Exploration contributed seismic data and related geological and geophysical services to the ventures.
Recently Issued Accounting Standards. The FASB has recently issued two new pronouncements, Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 149 Amendment of Statement 133 on Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities (SFAS 149); and Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 150, Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Characteristics of Both Liabilities and Equity (SFAS 150).
SFAS 149 amends and clarifies accounting for derivative instruments, including certain derivative instruments embedded in other contracts and hedging activities under SFAS 133. The amendments set forth in SFAS 149 require that contracts with comparable characteristics be accounted for similarly.
9
CONTANGO OIL & GAS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
SFAS 149 is generally effective for contracts entered into or modified after June 20, 2003 (with limited exceptions) and for hedging relationships designated after June 30, 2003. The guidance is to be applied prospectively only. The adoption of SFAS 149 has not had a material effect on the Companys financial statements.
SFAS 150 establishes standards for how an issuer classifies and measures certain financial instruments with characteristics of both liabilities and equity. It requires that an issuer classify a financial instrument that is within its scope as a liability (or an asset in some circumstances). Many of those instruments were previously classified as equity. SFAS 150 is effective for financial instruments entered into or modified after May 31, 2003, and otherwise was effective at the beginning of the first interim period beginning after June 15, 2003. It was to be implemented by reporting the cumulative effect of a change in an accounting principle for financial instruments created before the issuance date of SFAS 150 and still existing at the beginning of the interim period of adoption. Restatement is not permitted. The adoption of SFAS 150 did not have an impact on the Companys consolidated financial position or results of operations.
In December, 2003, the FASB issued FIN 46(R), Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities, An Interpretation of ARB 51. The primary objectives of FIN 46(R) are to provide guidance on how to identify entities for which control is achieved through means other than through voting rights (variable interest entities or VIEs) and how to determine when and which business enterprise should consolidate the VIE. Application of FIN 46(R) is required in the financial statements of public companies that have interests in VIEs or potential VIEs commonly referred to as special-purpose entities for periods ending after December 15, 2003. Application by public entities for all other types of entities is required in financial statements for periods ending after March 15, 2004. The Company does not anticipate the adoption of FIN 46(R) to have any effect on the Companys financial statements.
Stock-Based Compensation. Prior to the fiscal year-ended June 30, 2002, the Company accounted for employee stock-based compensation using the intrinsic value method prescribed in Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees. Under the intrinsic method, compensation cost for stock options is measured as the excess, if any, of the fair value of the Companys common stock at the date of the grant over the amount an employee must pay to acquire the common stock.
Effective July 1, 2001, the Company prospectively changed its method of accounting for employee stock-based compensation to the fair value based method prescribed in Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123, Accounting for Stock Based Compensation. Under the fair value based method, compensation cost is measured at the grant date based on the fair value of the award and is recognized over the award vesting period. The fair value of each award is estimated as of the date of grant using the Black-Scholes options-pricing model.
The Company has determined that the fair value method is preferable to the intrinsic value method previously applied. During the six months ended December 31, 2003 and 2002, the Company recorded a charge of $77,383 and $53,027 to general and administrative expense related to fiscal year 2003 and 2002 grants, respectively. Because compensation expense is recognized over a vesting period, the effect of applying the fair value method in the initial years of implementation may not be representative of the effects on net income (loss) that will be reported in future years.
10
CONTANGO OIL & GAS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities. Contango has periodically entered into commodity derivatives contracts and fixed-price physical contracts to manage its exposure to natural gas and oil price volatility. Commodity derivatives contracts, which are usually placed with investment grade companies that the Company believes is a minimal credit risk, may take the form of futures contracts, swaps or options. The natural gas and oil reference prices upon which these commodity derivatives contracts are based reflect various market indices that have a high degree of historical correlation with actual prices received by the Company.
In June 1998, the FASB issued SFAS 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities. SFAS 133 established accounting and reporting standards requiring that derivative instruments (including certain derivative instruments embedded in other contracts), as defined, be recorded in the balance sheet as either an asset or liability measured at fair value and requires that changes in fair value be recognized currently in earnings unless specific hedge accounting criteria are met.
Although the Companys hedging transactions generally are designed as economic hedges for a portion of future natural gas and oil production, the Company has elected not to designate the derivative instruments as hedges under SFAS 133. As a result, gains and losses, representing changes in these derivative instruments mark-to-market fair values, are recognized currently in the Companys earnings (see footnote 6 for more information on hedging activities).
2. Natural Gas and Oil Exploration Risk
The Companys future financial condition and results of operations will depend upon prices received for its natural gas and oil production and the cost of finding, acquiring, developing and producing reserves. Substantially all of its production is sold under various terms and arrangements at prevailing market prices. Prices for natural gas and oil are subject to fluctuations in response to changes in supply, market uncertainty and a variety of other factors beyond the Companys control. Other factors that have a direct bearing on the Companys prospects are uncertainties inherent in estimating natural gas and oil reserves and future hydrocarbon production and cash flows, particularly with respect to wells that have not been fully tested and with wells having limited production histories; access to additional capital; changes in the price of natural gas and oil; availability and cost of services and equipment; and the presence of competitors with greater financial resources and capacity.
3. Liquidity
Management believes that cash on hand, anticipated cash flow from operations and availability under the Companys bank credit facility (see footnote 4), will be adequate to satisfy planned capital expenditures to fund drilling activities and to satisfy general corporate needs over the next twelve months. The Company may continue to seek additional equity or other financing to fund the Companys exploration program and to take advantage of other opportunities that may become available. The availability of such funds will depend upon prevailing market conditions and other factors over which the Company has no control, as well as the Companys financial condition and results of operations. There can be no assurances that the Company will have sufficient funds available to finance its intended exploration and development programs or acquisitions. The Companys exploration drilling program could be adversely affected if sufficient funds are unavailable.
11
CONTANGO OIL & GAS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
4. Long-Term Debt
Contangos credit facility is a secured, reducing revolving line of credit with Guaranty Bank, FSB, secured by the Companys natural gas and oil reserves. On February 13, 2004, the borrowing base was redetermined to $25.0 million in two tranches. Tranche A provides for a borrowing base of $23.0 million and matures on June 29, 2006. This amount reduces by $520,000 per month the first day of each month beginning March 1, 2004. Borrowings under Tranche A bear interest, at the Companys option, at either (i) LIBOR plus two percent (2%) or (ii) the banks base rate plus one-fourth percent (1/4%) per annum. Additionally, the Company pays a quarterly commitment fee of three-eighths percent (3/8%) per annum on the average availability of Tranche A. Tranche B provides for a borrowing base of $2.0 million and matures on August 1, 2004. Borrowings under Tranche B will reduce by $520,000 per month the first day of each month following the date of borrowing, with the final reduction on August 1, 2004. Further, any amounts borrowed and repaid under Tranche B cannot be reborrowed. Borrowings under Tranche B bear interest, at the Companys option, at either (i) LIBOR plus three percent (3%) or (ii) the banks base rate plus three-quarters percent (3/4%) per annum. Additionally, the Company pays a quarterly commitment fee of one-half percent (1/2%) per annum on the average availability under Tranche B. As of December 31, 2003, the Companys long-term debt totaled $3,606,900, all of which was outstanding under Tranche A of the line of credit.
The hydrocarbon borrowing base is subject to semi-annual redetermination based primarily on the value of the Companys proved reserves. The credit facility requires the maintenance of certain ratios, including those related to working capital, funded debt to EBITDAX, and debt service coverage, as defined in the credit facility. Additionally, the credit facility contains certain negative covenants that, among other things, restrict or limit the Companys ability to incur indebtedness, sell assets, pay dividends and reacquire or otherwise acquire or redeem capital stock. Failure to maintain required financial ratios or comply with the credit facilitys covenants can result in a default and acceleration of all indebtedness under the credit facility.
As of December 31, 2003, the Company was in compliance with its financial covenants, ratios and other provisions of the credit facility. The average interest rate on the Companys long-term debt at December 31, 2003 was 3.13%.
12
CONTANGO OIL & GAS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
5. Net Income (Loss) Per Common Share
A reconciliation of the components of basic and diluted net income (loss) per share of common stock is presented in the tables below.
Three Months Ended December 31, 2003 |
Three Months Ended December 31, 2002 |
||||||||||||||||||
Income |
Weighted Average Shares |
Per Share |
(Loss) |
Weighted Average Shares |
Per Share |
||||||||||||||
Basic: |
|||||||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) attributable to common stock |
$ | 4,111,742 | 9,366,423 | $ | 0.44 | $ | (4,444,320 | ) | 9,043,282 | $ | (0.49 | ) | |||||||
Effect of Dilutive Securities: |
|||||||||||||||||||
Stock options and warrants |
| 1,153,778 | (a | ) | (a | ) | |||||||||||||
Series A preferred stock |
50,000 | 1,000,000 | (a | ) | (a | ) | |||||||||||||
Series B preferred stock |
100,000 | 1,136,363 | (a | ) | (a | ) | |||||||||||||
Series C preferred stock |
26,667 | 279,999 | | | |||||||||||||||
Diluted: |
|||||||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) attributable to common stock |
$ | 4,288,409 | 12,936,563 | $ | 0.33 | $ | (4,444,320 | ) | 9,043,282 | $ | (0.49 | ) | |||||||
(a) | Anti-dilutive. |
Six Months Ended December 31, 2003 |
Six Months Ended December 31, 2002 |
||||||||||||||||||
Income |
Weighted Average Shares |
Per Share |
(Loss) |
Weighted Average Shares |
Per Share |
||||||||||||||
Basic: |
|||||||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) attributable to common stock |
$ | 7,020,233 | 9,332,547 | $ | 0.75 | $ | (4,227,452 | ) | 9,043,282 | $ | (0.47 | ) | |||||||
Effect of Dilutive Securities: |
|||||||||||||||||||
Stock options and warrants |
| 1,038,849 | (a | ) | (a | ) | |||||||||||||
Series A preferred stock |
100,000 | 1,000,000 | (a | ) | (a | ) | |||||||||||||
Series B preferred stock |
200,000 | 1,136,363 | (a | ) | (a | ) | |||||||||||||
Series C preferred stock |
26,667 | 133,333 | | | |||||||||||||||
Diluted: |
|||||||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) attributable to common stock |
$ | 7,346,900 | 12,641,092 | $ | 0.58 | $ | (4,227,452 | ) | 9,043,282 | $ | (0.47 | ) | |||||||
(a) | Anti-dilutive. |
13
CONTANGO OIL & GAS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
6. Commodity Price Hedges
Contango periodically enters into commodity derivative contracts. These contracts, which are usually placed with large energy pipeline and trading companies, major petroleum companies or financial institutions that the Company believes are minimal credit risks, may take the form of futures contracts, swaps or options. In June 1998, the FASB issued SFAS 133. In June 2000, the FASB issued SFAS 138, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133. SFAS 133, as amended, establishes accounting and reporting standards requiring that every derivative instrument be recorded in the balance sheet as either an asset or liability measured at its fair value. The statement requires that changes in a derivatives fair value be recognized currently in earnings unless specific hedge criteria are met. The Company recognizes the changes in the derivatives fair value in its income statement under gain (loss) from hedging activities. The derivative contracts call for the Company to receive, or make, payments based upon the differential between a fixed and a variable commodity price as specified in the contract.
For the three months ended December 31, 2003, the Company reported a loss of $24,071 on hedging activities. For the six months ended December 31, 2003, the Company reported a gain of $58,171 on hedging activities. The Company had no open commodity derivative contracts as of December 31, 2003.
Due to the significant volatility in natural gas prices and the potential risk of significant hedging losses if NYMEX natural gas prices spike on the date options settle, the Companys current policy is to hedge only through the purchase of puts.
7. Gain on Sale of Marketable Securities
As part of the formation of Freeport LNG Development, L.P., Cheniere Energy, Inc. (Cheniere) granted Contango warrants to purchase 300,000 shares of Cheniere common stock. In June and September 2003, Contango exercised the warrants, purchasing 300,000 shares of Cheniere common stock. As of December 31, 2003, the Company had sold 300,000 shares of Cheniere common stock and reported a gain on the sale of marketable securities for the six months ended December 31, 2003 of $710,322 as follows:
Three Months Ended |
YTD Total December 31, 2003 |
|||||||||||
September 30, 2003 |
December 31, 2003 |
|||||||||||
Realized gain on sale of marketable securities sold |
$ | 591,049 | $ | 570,773 | $ | 1,161,822 | ||||||
Unrealized gain on marketable securities held as an investment |
505,750 | | | |||||||||
Reversal of previously recognized unrealized gain |
(451,500 | ) | (505,750 | ) | (451,500 | ) | ||||||
Total recognized gain |
$ | 645,299 | $ | 65,023 | $ | 710,322 | ||||||
8. Series C Convertible Preferred Stock
On December 12, 2003, Contango sold 1,600 shares of its Series C convertible cumulative preferred stock (the Series C Preferred Stock) to a group of private institutional investors for gross proceeds of $8.0 million. Series C Preferred Stock ranks prior to the Companys common stock (and any
14
CONTANGO OIL & GAS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
other junior stock) with respect to the payment of dividends or distributions and upon liquidation, dissolution, winding-up or otherwise and is junior to the Companys Series A senior convertible cumulative preferred stock and Series B senior convertible cumulative preferred stock. Holders of Series C Preferred Stock are entitled to receive quarterly dividends at a dividend rate equal to 6% per annum if paid in cash on a current quarterly basis or otherwise at a rate of 7.5% per annum if not paid on a current quarterly basis or if paid in shares of Series C Preferred Stock, in each case, computed on the basis of $5,000 per share. Holders of Series C Preferred Stock may, at their discretion, elect to convert such shares to shares of the Companys common stock at a conversion price of $6.00 per share. After June 12, 2005, upon the occurrence of certain events, the Company may elect to convert all of the outstanding shares of Series C Preferred Stock into Contango common stock. The Company has filed a shelf registration with the Securities and Exchange Commission, which has become effective, covering the 1,333,328 common shares issuable upon conversion of the Series C preferred stock.
9. Sale of Properties
In September 2003, The Company completed the sale of certain reserves in Brooks County, Texas for $5.0 million and recorded a gain of approximately $900,000 for the six months ended of December 31, 2003. Proved reserves were 1.5 Bcfe and accounted for approximately $5.0 million of the Companys discounted present value at 10% per annum as of June 30, 2003.
In December 2003, Contango and Republic Exploration sold their producing Gulf of Mexico leases for approximately $12.0 million. As a result of this sale, Contango recorded a gain of approximately $6.2 million as of December 31, 2003. Properties included in the sale were Eugene Island 110, Grand Isle 28 and High Island 25-L. Contango received approximately $3.7 million in cash proceeds for its portion of the sale. Republic Exploration received cash proceeds of approximately $8.3 million for its portion of the sale. Republic Exploration subsequently made distributions of $3.0 million to its members, including a $1.0 million distribution to Contango.
10. Subsequent Events
On February 2, 2004, the Company converted its Series A convertible cumulative preferred stock (the Series A Preferred Stock) and its Series B convertible cumulative preferred stock (the Series B Preferred Stock) to shares of common stock. The Series A Preferred Stock had a face value of $2.5 million, paid an 8.0% annual dividend and was converted into 1,000,000 shares of Contango common stock. The Series B Preferred Stock had a face value of $5.0 million, paid an 8.0% annual dividend and was converted into 1,136,364 shares of Contango common stock. As a result of the conversion of the Series A Preferred Stock and Series B Preferred Stock, together with the exercise of certain warrants and stock options, the number of the Companys outstanding shares of common stock increased to 12,086,690 as of February 13, 2004. The Company has agreed to file a shelf registration statement covering these 2,136,364 shares of common stock, plus an additional 1,851,852 shares of common stock owned by Trust Company of the West, the holder of the Series A Preferred Stock.
15
Item 2. | Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and the accompanying notes and other information included elsewhere in this Form 10-Q and in our Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2003, previously filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Uncertainty of Forward-Looking Statements and Information
Some of the statements made in this Form 10-Q may contain forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. The words and phrases should be, will be, believe, expect, anticipate, estimate, forecast, goal and similar expressions identify forward-looking statements and express our expectations about future events. These include such matters as:
| Our financial position |
| Business strategy and budgets |
| Anticipated capital expenditures |
| Drilling of wells |
| Natural gas and oil reserves |
| Timing and amount of future production of natural gas and oil |
| Operating costs and other expenses |
| Cash flow and anticipated liquidity |
| Prospect development |
| Property acquisitions and sales |
| Hedging results |
| Development of our LNG receiving terminal |
Although we believe the expectations reflected in such forward-looking statements are reasonable, we cannot assure you that such expectations will occur. These forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause our actual results, performance or achievements to be materially different from actual future results expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements. These factors include among others:
| The risks associated with exploration, including cost overruns and the drilling of non-economic wells or dry holes |
| Availability of capital and the ability to repay indebtedness when due |
| Ability to raise capital to fund capital expenditures |
| The ability to find, acquire, market, develop and produce new natural gas and oil properties |
| Natural gas and oil price volatility |
| Uncertainties in the estimation of proved reserves and in the projection of future rates of production and timing of development expenditures |
| Operating hazards attendant to the natural gas and oil business |
| Downhole drilling and completion risks that are generally not recoverable from third parties or insurance |
| Potential mechanical failure or under-performance of significant wells or pipeline mishaps |
| Climatic conditions |
| Availability and cost of material and equipment |
16
| Delays in anticipated start-up dates |
| Actions or inactions of third-party operators of our properties |
| Commodity price movements adversely affecting our hedge position |
| Ability to find and retain skilled personnel |
| Strength and financial resources of competitors |
| Federal and state regulatory developments and approvals |
| Environmental risks |
| Worldwide economic conditions |
| Ability of LNG to become a competitive energy supply in the United States |
| Operational and financial risks associated with foreign exploration and production |
You should not unduly rely on these forward-looking statements in this Form 10-Q, as they speak only as of the date of this Form 10-Q. Except as required by law, we undertake no obligation to publicly release any revisions to these forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances occurring after the date of this Form 10-Q or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events. See the information under the heading Risk Factors in our Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2003 for some of the important factors that could affect our financial performance or could cause actual results to differ materially from estimates contained in forward-looking statements.
Overview
We are an independent natural gas and oil company engaged in the exploration, production and acquisition of natural gas and oil in the United States. Our primary source of production is currently in south Texas. Our south Texas properties currently account for all of our production. We also own leases and conduct exploration activities offshore in the Gulf of Mexico and hold a 10% limited partnership interest in a proposed LNG terminal in Freeport, Texas.
Our Strategy
Our strategy is predicated upon two core beliefs: (1) that the only competitive advantage in the commodity-based natural gas and oil business is to be among the lowest cost producers and (2) that virtually all the exploration and production industrys value creation occurs through the drilling of successful exploratory wells. As a result, our business strategy includes the following elements:
Funding exploration prospects developed by our alliance partners. Because we only have four employees, we depend on alliance partners for exploration, development and production expertise. Our three alliance partners, Juneau Exploration Company, LP (JEX), Alta Resources, LLC and Coastline Exploration, Inc., perform all of our prospect generation and evaluation functions.
Negotiated acquisitions of proved properties. We continue to seek negotiated producing property acquisitions based on our view of the pricing cycles of natural gas and oil and available exploitation opportunities of probable and possible reserves. Since January 1, 2002, we have acquired approximately 14.0 Bcfe of proved developed producing reserves of natural gas and oil.
Sale of proved properties. From time-to-time as part of our business strategy, we may sell some or a substantial portion of our proved reserves to capture current value, using the sales proceeds to further our exploration activities. In July 2003, we sold producing properties consisting of 10 wells in
17
south Texas for $5.0 million, and in December 2003, Contango and its 33%-owned subsidiary, Republic Exploration LLC, sold all of their then producing Gulf of Mexico leases for approximately $12.0 million.
Controlling general and administrative and geological and geophysical costs. Our goal is to be among the highest in the industry in revenue and profit per employee and among the lowest in general and administrative costs. We plan to continue outsourcing our geological, geophysical, reservoir engineering and land functions, and partnering with cost efficient operators whenever possible. We have four employees.
Structuring transactions to minimize front-end investments. We seek to maximize returns on capital by minimizing our up-front investments in acreage, seismic data and prospect generation whenever possible. We want our key partners to share in both the risk and the rewards of our success.
Seeking new alliance ventures. While our core focus will remain the domestic exploration and production business, we will also continue to seek opportunities that may include foreign exploration prospects, such as our recent agreement with Texas Petroleum Investment Company (TPIC) to pursue an oil exploration prospect in the Aquitaine Basin in southwestern France. We may also make investments in downstream natural gas assets, such as our investment in our Freeport, Texas LNG gasification plant.
Structuring incentives to drive behavior. We believe that equity ownership aligns the interests of our partners, employees, and stockholders. Our directors and executive officers beneficially own approximately 20% of our common stock. In addition, our alliance partners co-invest in prospects that they recommend to us.
Exploration Alliances with JEX, Alta Resources and Coastline
Alliance with JEX. Under our agreement with JEX, JEX evaluates natural gas and oil prospects and recommends exploration prospect and proved property acquisition investment opportunities to us. In exchange, we have committed, within various parameters, to invest along with JEX up to 95% of the available working interest in the recommended prospects and property acquisitions. Under the JEX agreement, JEX brings onshore prospects directly to Contango. Offshore prospects are typically generated by our affiliated companies. See Offshore Exploration Joint Ventures below.
If JEX recommends any prospects to Contango, we pay the lease and seismic costs, and JEX generally pays the remaining costs of generating and preparing a prospect to drill ready status. When drilling begins on a prospect, we are obligated to assign to the JEX geoscientists an overriding royalty interest equal to 3 1/3% of our working interest in the prospect. In addition, when our revenues from prospects we invest in under the agreement during a calendar year, net of taxes, royalties and other expenses equals our capital expenditure related to the acquisition and development of the prospects on a well-by-well basis, JEX is entitled to an assignment or automatic reversion of 25% of our working interest in the well. With respect to reserve acquisitions, we have the right, but not the obligation, to purchase up to 95% of the interests available to JEX in proved natural gas and oil reserves.
We may terminate the agreement upon 30 days written notice, and JEX may terminate the agreement upon 180 days notice. If we are in default under the agreement, however, JEX may terminate the agreement upon 30 days written notice.
18
Alliance with Alta Resources. Alta Resources is a private company formed for the purpose of assembling domestic, onshore natural gas and oil prospects. In July 2003, Contango and Alta Resources entered into an agreement with Seitel Data Ltd. for a 3-D seismic shoot covering approximately 40 square miles in southern Duval County, Texas. The cost to Contango for this 3-D seismic shoot was approximately $1.7 million. The seismic shoot was completed in November 2003, and processing, evaluation and prospect identification is now underway. As part of the participation agreement between Contango and Alta Resources, Contango will receive a 42.5% working interest (an approximate 32% net revenue interest) in approximately 9,000 acres of natural gas and oil leases owned by Alta Resources in Duval County, Texas. These leases are directly on trend with nearby Queen City discoveries, including our Queen City production located to the south. We will have the right to participate in any wells drilled on identified prospects. On each prospect drilled, Alta Resources will receive an overriding royalty interest ranging from 1.0% to 3.0% of our working interest depending on the net revenue interest in the prospect. When drilling begins on a prospect, we will bear 50% of the drilling costs through first production and will have a 42.5% working interest (an approximate 32% net revenue interest) in producing wells.
Alliance with Coastline. Coastline is a private company engaged in domestic, onshore natural gas and oil exploration and production. In October 2003, Contango and Coastline entered into an exploration agreement to explore and develop prospects in south Texas over the next six months using existing 3-D seismic data in Kenedy County, Texas. Review, evaluation and acquisition of leases are progressing. We anticipate any drillable prospects will be identified by April 2004. Our investment in this exploration venture currently totals $75,000.
Domestic Onshore Exploration and Properties
JEX Activities
In 2003, we participated in a 3-D seismic shoot in Jim Hogg and Starr Counties, Texas, covering approximately 100 square miles at a net cost to us of approximately $2.7 million. The processing and evaluation of this data is now complete. We have drilled four shallow wells, three successful and one dry. We also drilled a Queen City exploratory well in November 2003 that is currently producing. Based on this well, we expect to drill an additional Queen City well, with an estimated net dry hole cost of approximately $400,000.
In August 2003, Contango, along with JEX, entered into a participation agreement with several other parties to identify and evaluate natural gas and oil exploration prospects in a prospect area covering approximately 32,000 acres in Dimmit and Zavala Counties, Texas. Our share of prospect identification is expected to cost approximately $1.0 million. We currently have advanced approximately $220,000 as our share of prospect identification costs.
During the three months ended December 31, 2003, we participated with an approximate 7.1% working interest in a 15,500-foot Wilcox test in Goliad County, Texas. Our cost to drill and complete this well is estimated at approximately $433,000. The well is still under evaluation.
Alta Resources Activities
We recently drilled a Queen City exploratory well with Alta Resources in Jim Hogg County, Texas (45% working interest) that resulted in a dry hole. Our cost to drill and complete this well was approximately $700,000.
19
In October 2003, Contango and Alta Resources completed a 3-D seismic shoot covering approximately 40 square miles in southern Duval County, Texas. The net cost to us was approximately $1.7 million. Two prospects have been identified, one shallow and a Queen City prospect. The estimated dry hole cost of these two wells is approximately $500,000, with drilling expected to start in the April 2004 timeframe. If this play develops, we would expect to drill another three to five development wells with drilling expenditures in the $2.1 to $3.5 million range.
We have recently agreed to participate with Alta Resources in a prospect located onshore in Matagorda County, Texas. The dry hole cost is estimated at approximately $1.4 million, of which our share will be approximately $700,000. After casing point, we will own an approximate 34% working interest in the well. Drilling is expected to commence in the April 2004 timeframe.
Coastline Activities
In October 2003, we agreed to participate with Coastline in any exploration prospects that may be generated in a prospect area in Kenedy County, Texas. If this play develops, we could drill three to five exploratory wells with a dry hole cost in the $1.0 to $2.0 million range.
International Onshore Exploration and Properties
Contango and TPIC have agreed to pursue an oil exploration prospect in the Aquitaine Basin in southwestern France. The initial well will be an oil test to be drilled to approximately 10,500 feet. The dry hole cost of this well is estimated at approximately $4.0 million. Contangos dry hole exposure is estimated at approximately $800,000. The assignment of our 20% interest in the exploration prospect and approval for the well are subject to French government approval, which is expected within the next 90 to 120 days. We will develop our future plans in France based on the results of this well.
Offshore Gulf of Mexico Exploration Joint Ventures
Contango. Contango directly and through affiliated companies conducts exploration activities in the Gulf of Mexico. Currently, Contango has an interest in three offshore leases. See Offshore Operations and Properties below for additional information on Contangos offshore properties.
Contango also owns an equity interest in Republic Exploration LLC, Magnolia Offshore Exploration LLC and Contango Offshore Exploration LLC, formed for the purpose of generating exploration opportunities in the Gulf of Mexico. These limited liability companies (LLCs) have collectively licensed approximately 4,000 blocks of 3-D seismic data and have focused on identifying prospects, acquiring leases at federal and state lease sales and then selling the prospects to third parties, subject to timed drilling obligations plus retained reversionary interests in favor of the LLCs. In the future, Contango may choose to take a direct working interest in some of these prospects under the same arms-length terms available to industry partners.
Republic Exploration LLC. Contangos original investment in Republic Exploration in August 2000 was approximately $6.7 million for a 33.3% ownership interest. The other members of Republic Exploration are JEX, its managing member, and a privately held company. Both have comprehensive offshore experience. Republic Exploration holds a non-exclusive license to approximately 1,700 blocks of 3-D seismic data in the shallow waters of the Gulf of Mexico. This data is used to identify, acquire and exploit natural gas and oil prospects. All leases owned by Republic Exploration are subject to a
20
3.3% overriding royalty interest in favor of the JEX exploration team. See Offshore Operations and Properties below for more information on Republic Explorations offshore properties.
Magnolia Offshore Exploration LLC. Contango purchased a 50% interest in Magnolia Offshore Exploration in October 2001. JEX is the only other member and acts as the managing member. In March 2002, Magnolia Offshore Exploration was the high bidder on three blocks offshore Louisiana in the Gulf of Mexico lease sale. In November 2002, the members of Magnolia Offshore Exploration made the decision to limit activities to its three existing leases; thus, no additional leases will be acquired. One lease block was drilled, resulting in a dry hole, and the other two lease blocks are available for farmout. Contangos current investment in Magnolia Offshore Exploration is approximately $763,000. See Offshore Operations and Properties below for additional information on Magnolia Offshore Explorations properties.
Contango Offshore Exploration LLC. Contango purchased a 66.7% interest in Contango Offshore Exploration in September 2002. JEX is the only other member and acts as the managing member. Contango Offshore Explorations activities will be focused on identifying and purchasing prospects in the Gulf of Mexico and selling them to third parties, retaining a reversionary interest. To date, Contango Offshore Exploration has invested approximately $8.5 million to acquire and reprocess 2,294 blocks of 3-D seismic data and to acquire leases in the Gulf of Mexico. Contango Offshore Exploration has acquired a total of eight leases, all of which are available for farmout. All leases will be subject to a 3.3% overriding royalty interest in favor of the JEX exploration team. See Offshore Operations and Properties below for additional information on Contango Offshore Explorations properties.
In December 2003, Contango and Republic Exploration sold their producing Gulf of Mexico leases for approximately $12.0 million. As a result of this sale, Contango recorded a gain of approximately $6.2 million as of December 31, 2003. Properties included in the sale were Eugene Island 110, Grand Isle 28 and High Island 25-L. Contango received approximately $3.7 million in cash proceeds for its portion of the sale. Republic Exploration received cash proceeds of approximately $8.3 million for its portion of the sale. Republic Exploration subsequently made distributions of $3.0 million to its members, including a $1.0 million distribution to Contango. After payment of these distributions and including cash already on hand, Republic Exploration has total cash of approximately $8.7 million available for future lease acquisitions and exploration drilling.
Current Activities. In August 2003, Contango Offshore Exploration and Republic Exploration participated in the Gulf of Mexico Lease Sale #187. Republic Exploration was high bidder on one lease block, and Contango Offshore Exploration was high bidder on four lease blocks. Three of Contango Offshore Explorations lease blocks are located in the East Breaks area and are in deep water (1,600 to 2,500 feet). These awards represent a new exploration region for Contango. As with our deep shelf exploration, our business plan is to farm-out these prospects and retain only a reversionary working interest or an overriding royalty interest. Contango expects that Republic Exploration and Contango Offshore Exploration will participate in the Central Gulf of Mexico lease sale to be held in March 2004.
Contango and Republic Exploration recently farmed out two deep shelf lease blocks, Vermilion 73 and Eugene Island 113B. A deep test on Vermilion 73 is currently drilling, with a shallower well expected to be drilled during 2004. Eugene Island 113B is expected to spud later this year. In addition, we anticipate that our West Cameron 174 Block and East Breaks Blocks 283, 369 and 370 will be farmed-out and drilled during 2004.
21
The Minerals Management Service (MMS) recently released a new rule on royalty relief for shallow water, deep natural gas production from certain Gulf of Mexico leases. Deep gas refers to natural gas produced from wells greater than 15,000 feet in waters of 200 meters or less. Royalty relief is available on the first 15 BCF of natural gas production if produced from an interval between 15,000 to less than 18,000 feet. Royalty relief is available on the first 25 BCF of natural gas production if produced from an interval between greater than 18,000 feet. This royalty relief is expected to have a positive impact on the economics of deep gas wells drilled on the shelf of the Gulf of Mexico.
Offshore Properties
The following table sets forth the interests owned by Contango and related entities in the Gulf of Mexico as of February 13, 2004:
Area/Block |
WI |
NRI |
Acquired |
Status | ||||||
Contango Oil & Gas Company: |
||||||||||
Eugene Island 28 |
(4) | (4 | ) | Mar-00 | Sold 01/2004 | |||||
Brazos 436 |
13.6 | % | 10.8 | % | Jul-00 | Shut in; pending abandonment | ||||
Grand Isle 28 |
(5) | (5) | Apr-01 | Sold 12/2003 | ||||||
East Cameron 107 |
33.8 | % | 27.0 | % | May-01 | Available for farm-out | ||||
Eugene Island 113B |
(2) | (2) | May-01 | Farmed out; expected to spud 2004 | ||||||
Eugene Island 110 |
(5) | (5) | Jul-01 | Sold 12/2003 | ||||||
Republic Exploration (1): |
||||||||||
High Island 25L, N/2NE |
(5) | (5) | Jan-01 | Sold 12/2003 | ||||||
Grand Isle 28 |
(5) | (5) | Apr-01 | Sold 12/2003 | ||||||
East Cameron 107 |
66.2 | % | 53.0 | % | May-01 | Available for farm-out | ||||
Eugene Island 113B |
(2) | (2) | May-01 | Farmed out; expected to spud 2004 | ||||||
Eugene Island 110 |
(5) | (5) | Jul-01 | Sold 12/2003 | ||||||
West Delta 36 |
100.0 | % | 80.0 | % | May-02 | Available for farm-out | ||||
Vermilion 73 |
(3) | (3) | Jul-02 | Deep prospect drilling; shallow test expected in 2004 | ||||||
West Cameron 174 |
100.0 | % | 80.0 | % | Jun-03 | Farm-out and drilling expected in 2004 | ||||
High Island 113 |
100.0 | % | 80.0 | % | Sep-03 | Available for farm-out | ||||
Magnolia Offshore Exploration (1): |
||||||||||
Ship Shoal 155 |
100.0 | % | 80.0 | % | May-02 | Available for farm-out | ||||
Viosca Knoll 75 |
100.0 | % | 80.0 | % | May-02 | Available for farm-out | ||||
Contango Offshore Exploration (1): |
||||||||||
Vermillion 231 |
100.0 | % | 80.0 | % | May-03 | Available for farm-out | ||||
Viosca Knoll 167 |
100.0 | % | 80.0 | % | May-03 | Available for farm-out | ||||
Eugene Island 209 |
100.0 | % | 80.0 | % | Jun-03 | Available for farm-out | ||||
Viosca Knoll 161 |
100.0 | % | 80.0 | % | Jun-03 | Available for farm-out | ||||
High Island A16 |
100.0 | % | 80.0 | % | Nov-03 | Available for farm-out | ||||
East Breaks 283 |
100.0 | % | 80.0 | % | Nov-03 | Farm-out and drilling expected in 2004 | ||||
East Breaks 369 |
100.0 | % | 80.0 | % | Nov-03 | Farm-out and drilling expected in 2004 | ||||
East Breaks 370 |
100.0 | % | 80.0 | % | Nov-03 | Farm-out and drilling expected in 2004 |
(1) | Contango has a 33.3% interest in Republic Exploration, 50% interest in Magnolia Offshore Exploration (subject to a third party net profits interest) and 66.7% interest in Contango Offshore Exploration. |
(2) | At project payout, Contango (33.75%) and Republic Exploration (66.25%) will collectively have the option to take a 25% |
22
working interest (8.44% WI/ 6.75% NRI and 16.56% WI/13.25% NRI, respectively) or a 10% overriding royalty interest (3.4% and 6.6%, respectively). |
(3) | At project payout, Republic Exploration will have the option to elect to receive a 25% working interest (20% net revenue interest) or a 10% ORRI; provided, however, Republics interest (after payout) in any wells drilled within the participating area, covering depth limited-portions of this block and three other contiguous third party-owned blocks, will either be a 4.625% WI (3.70% NRI) or a 1.85% ORRI (inasmuch as VR-73 comprises only 18.5% of the lands included in the four block participating area). |
(4) | Sold 01/2004. |
(5) | Sold 12/2003. |
Freeport LNG Development, L.P.
In March 2003, we exercised an option to purchase from Cheniere Energy, Inc. a 10% limited partnership interest in Freeport LNG Development, L.P. (Freeport LNG Project and Freeport LNG), a limited partnership formed to develop a LNG receiving terminal in Freeport, Texas. Our commitment is $2.3 million, $1,650,000 of which has been paid as of February 13, 2004. The balance of $683,333 is being paid in $100,000 monthly payments in March and April 2004, with an $83,333 payment due in May 2004 and a final payment of $400,000 due upon receipt of Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) approval for the project.
In March 2003, we announced that Freeport LNG had submitted a filing to FERC for the construction of the LNG receiving terminal. In August 2003, we announced that Freeport LNG had signed a contract with Technip USA, a subsidiary of Technip, for the Front End Engineering Design that will lead to the finalization of the engineering, procurement and construction contract for its proposed LNG receiving terminal.
In November 2003, we announced that FERC had concluded in a draft Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) that the approval of Freeport LNGs proposed liquefied natural gas receiving terminal, with the adoption of recommended mitigation measures, would have limited adverse environmental impact and would be an environmentally acceptable action. Freeport LNG expects to receive a final EIS and final FERC approval for its application to build a 1.5 Bcf per day LNG receiving terminal near Freeport, Texas in 2004. The EIS provided for a comment period, and FERC has conducted a public meeting that gave interested parties an opportunity to comment on the draft EIS. Assuming that FERC approval is received in 2004, the construction phase is expected to commence during 2004, with the first LNG shipment being received in the second half of 2007.
In December 2003, we announced the signing of an agreement between ConocoPhillips and Freeport LNG whereby ConocoPhillips will participate in Freeport LNGs project to build the receiving terminal. ConocoPhillips will acquire one billion cubic feet per day of capacity in the terminal for its use, obtain a 50% interest in the general partner of Freeport LNG, and provide construction funding presently estimated at $400-450 million. We continue to own a 10% limited partnership interest in the project.
The management of Freeport LNG will remain in place and be responsible for all commercial activities and customer interface for the remaining capacity in the facility. ConocoPhillips will be primarily responsible for the management of construction and operation of the facility. The transaction calls for ConocoPhillips, as a user of the facility, to pay its proportionate share of operating expenses and fuel costs, a throughput fee of $0.05 per Mcf, and all amounts necessary to amortize the construction funding. In addition, ConocoPhillips has paid a non-refundable capacity reservation fee of $10.0 million
23
to Freeport LNG. The transaction is expected to close in the spring of 2004, subject to completion of remaining documentation and satisfaction of closing conditions.
As part of the formation of Freeport LNG Development, L.P., Cheniere granted Contango warrants to purchase 300,000 shares of Cheniere common stock. In June and September 2003, Contango exercised the warrants, acquiring 300,000 shares of Cheniere common stock. As of December 31, 2003, we had sold the 300,000 shares, recognizing a gain of $710,322 for the six months ended December 31, 2003. See MD&A, Gain on Sale of Marketable Securities for additional information.
Critical Accounting Policies
The application of generally accepted accounting principles involves certain assumptions, judgments, choices and estimates that affect reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses. Thus, the application of these principles can result in varying results from company to company. Contangos critical accounting principles, which are described below, relate to the successful efforts method for costs related to natural gas and oil activities, consolidation principles, accounting for financial instruments and stock options.
Successful Efforts Method of Accounting. The Company follows the successful efforts method of accounting for its natural gas and oil activities. Under the successful efforts method, lease acquisition costs and all development costs are capitalized. Unproved properties are reviewed quarterly to determine if there has been impairment of the carrying value, and any such impairment is charged to expense in the period. Exploratory drilling costs are capitalized until the results are determined. If proved reserves are not discovered, the exploratory drilling costs are expensed. Other exploratory costs, such as seismic costs and other geological and geophysical expenses, are expensed as incurred. The provision for depreciation, depletion and amortization is based on the capitalized costs as determined above. Depreciation, depletion and amortization is on a cost center by cost center basis using the unit of production method, with lease acquisition costs amortized over total proved reserves and other costs amortized over proved developed reserves.
When circumstances indicate that proved properties may be impaired, the Company compares expected undiscounted future cash flows on a cost center basis to the unamortized capitalized cost of the asset. If the future undiscounted cash flows, based on the Companys estimate of future natural gas and oil prices and operating costs and anticipated production from proved reserves, are lower than the unamortized capitalized cost, then the capitalized cost is reduced to fair market value.
On July 1, 2003, the Company changed its accounting policy for amortizing and impairing the Companys natural gas and oil properties from a well-by-well cost center basis to a field-by-field cost center basis. Management believes the newly adopted policy is preferable in the circumstances to have greater comparability with other successful efforts natural gas and oil companies by conforming to predominant industry practice. In addition, the field level is consistent with the Companys operational and strategic assessment of its natural gas and oil investments. The Company determined that the cumulative effect of the change in accordance with APB Opinion No. 20 was immaterial to the consolidated financial statements.
Principles of Consolidation. The Companys consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Contango Oil & Gas Company and its subsidiaries and affiliates, after elimination of all intercompany balances and transactions. Wholly owned subsidiaries are fully consolidated. Subsidiaries not wholly owned, such as 33.3% owned Republic Exploration LLC (Republic Exploration), 50.0%
24
owned Magnolia Offshore Exploration LLC (Magnolia Offshore Exploration) and 66.7% owned Contango Offshore Exploration LLC (Contango Offshore Exploration) are not controlled by the Company and are proportionately consolidated. By agreement, Republic Exploration, Magnolia Offshore Exploration and Contango Offshore Exploration have disproportionate allocations of their profits and losses among the owners. Accordingly, the Company determines its income or losses from the ventures based on a hypothetical liquidation determination of how increases or decreases in the book value of the ventures net assets will ultimately affect the cash payments to the Company in the event of dissolution.
During the quarter ended December 31, 2002, both Republic Exploration and Magnolia Offshore Exploration completed exploration activities to fully expend the Companys initial cash contributions to the ventures thereby triggering a change in profit and loss allocations. This triggering event earned the other partners in Republic Exploration and Magnolia Offshore Exploration the right to receive their proportionate share of the Companys initial investment in Republic Exploration and Magnolia Offshore Exploration. As such, the Company proportionately consolidated 33.3% of Republic Explorations and 50.0% of Magnolia Offshore Explorations net assets as of December 31, 2002, as opposed to 100% of each ventures net assets as of September 30, 2002. The reduction of the Companys ownership in the net assets of Republic Exploration and Magnolia Offshore Exploration resulted in a non-cash exploration expense of approximately $4.2 million and approximately $200,000, respectively. The Companys cash contributions to Contango Offshore Exploration during the quarter ended December 31, 2002 that were expended for geological and geophysical data resulted in an approximate $4.1 million exploration expense. The Companys proportionate share of the ventures cash balances is classified as other long-term assets since it is expected those funds will be expended for their intended purposes.
By agreement, since the Company was the only owner that contributed cash to Republic Exploration and Magnolia Offshore Exploration, the Company consolidated 100% of the ventures net assets and results of operations until the ventures expended all of the Companys initial cash contributions. Subsequent to that event, the owners share in the net assets of the ventures is based on their stated ownership percentages. By agreement, the owners in Contango Offshore Exploration immediately share in the net assets of Contango Offshore Exploration, including the initial Company cash contribution, based on their stated ownership percentages. The other owners of Republic Exploration, Magnolia Offshore Exploration and Contango Offshore Exploration contributed seismic data and related geological and geophysical services to the ventures.
Recently Issued Accounting Standards. The FASB has recently issued two new pronouncements, Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 149 Amendment of Statement 133 on Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities (SFAS 149); and Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 150, Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Characteristics of Both Liabilities and Equity (SFAS 150).
SFAS 149 amends and clarifies accounting for derivative instruments, including certain derivative instruments embedded in other contracts and hedging activities under SFAS 133. The amendments set forth in SFAS 149 require that contracts with comparable characteristics be accounted for similarly. SFAS 149 is generally effective for contracts entered into or modified after June 20, 2003 (with limited exceptions) and for hedging relationships designated after June 30, 2003. The guidance is to be applied prospectively only. The adoption of SFAS 149 has not had a material effect on the Companys financial statements.
SFAS150 establishes standards for how an issuer classifies and measures certain financial instruments with characteristics of both liabilities and equity. It requires that an issuer classify a financial
25
instrument that is within its scope as a liability (or an asset in some circumstances). Many of those instruments were previously classified as equity. SFAS 150 is effective for financial instruments entered into or modified after May 31, 2003, and otherwise was effective at the beginning of the first interim period beginning after June 15, 2003. It was to be implemented by reporting the cumulative effect of a change in an accounting principle for financial instruments created before the issuance date of SFAS 150 and still existing at the beginning of the interim period of adoption. Restatement is not permitted. The adoption of SFAS 150 did not have an impact on the Companys consolidated financial position or results of operations.
In December, 2003, the FASB issued FIN 46(R), Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities, An Interpretation of ARB 51. The primary objectives of FIN 46(R) are to provide guidance on how to identify entities for which control is achieved through means other than through voting rights (variable interest entities or VIEs) and how to determine when and which business enterprise should consolidate the VIE. Application of FIN 46(R) is required in the financial statements of public companies that have interests in VIEs or potential VIEs commonly referred to as special-purpose entities for periods ending after December 15, 2003. Application by public entities for all other types of entities is required in financial statements for periods ending after March 15, 2004. The Company does not anticipate the adoption of FIN 46(R) to have any effect on the Companys financial statements.
Stock-Based Compensation. Prior to the fiscal year-ended June 30, 2002, the Company accounted for employee stock-based compensation using the intrinsic value method prescribed in Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees. Under the intrinsic method, compensation cost for stock options is measured as the excess, if any, of the fair value of the Companys common stock at the date of the grant over the amount an employee must pay to acquire the common stock.
Effective July 1, 2001, the Company prospectively changed its method of accounting for employee stock-based compensation to the fair value based method prescribed in Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123, Accounting for Stock Based Compensation. Under the fair value based method, compensation cost is measured at the grant date based on the fair value of the award and is recognized over the award vesting period. The fair value of each award is estimated as of the date of grant using the Black-Scholes options-pricing model.
The Company has determined that the fair value method is preferable to the intrinsic value method previously applied. During the six months ended December 31, 2003 and 2002, the Company recorded a charge of $77,383 and $53,027 to general and administrative expense related to fiscal year 2003 and 2002 grants, respectively. Because compensation expense is recognized over a vesting period, the effect of applying the fair value method in the initial years of implementation may not be representative of the effects on net income (loss) that will be reported in future years.
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities. Contango has periodically entered into commodity derivatives contracts and fixed-price physical contracts to manage its exposure to natural gas and oil price volatility. Commodity derivatives contracts, which are usually placed with investment grade companies that the Company believes is a minimal credit risk, may take the form of futures contracts, swaps or options. The natural gas and oil reference prices upon which these commodity derivatives contracts are based reflect various market indices that have a high degree of historical correlation with actual prices received by the Company.
26
In June 1998, the FASB issued SFAS 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities. SFAS 133 established accounting and reporting standards requiring that derivative instruments (including certain derivative instruments embedded in other contracts), as defined, be recorded in the balance sheet as either an asset or liability measured at fair value and requires that changes in fair value be recognized currently in earnings unless specific hedge accounting criteria are met.
Although the Companys hedging transactions generally are designed as economic hedges for a portion of future natural gas and oil production, the Company has elected not to designate the derivative instruments as hedges under SFAS 133. As a result, gains and losses, representing changes in these derivative instruments mark-to-market fair values, are recognized currently in the Companys earnings (see footnote 6 for more information on hedging activities).
MD&A Summary Data
The table below sets forth, for the periods indicated, summary information discussed below.
Three Months Ended December 31, |
Six Months Ended December 31, |
||||||||||||||||||||
2003 |
2002 |
Change |
2003 |
2002 |
Change |
||||||||||||||||
Natural gas and oil sales |
$ | 5,980,308 | $ | 7,714,265 | -22 | % | $ | 14,232,812 | $ | 14,731,758 | -3 | % | |||||||||
Gain (loss) from hedging activities |
$ | (24,071 | ) | $ | (192,970 | ) | * | $ | 58,171 | $ | (186,326 | ) | * | ||||||||
Production: |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Natural gas (thousand cubic feet per day) |
11,364 | 17,466 | -35 | % | 13,089 | 18,043 | -27 | % | |||||||||||||
Oil and condensate (barrels per day) |
241 | 417 | -42 | % | 314 | 417 | -25 | % | |||||||||||||
Average sales price: |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Natural gas (per thousand cubic feet) |
$ | 5.08 | $ | 4.21 | 21 | % | $ | 5.20 | $ | 3.84 | 35 | % | |||||||||
Oil and condensate (per barrel) |
$ | 30.10 | $ | 24.63 | 22 | % | $ | 29.57 | $ | 25.85 | 14 | % | |||||||||
Operating expenses |
$ | 916,685 | $ | 1,671,028 | -45 | % | $ | 2,568,914 | $ | 2,730,799 | -6 | % | |||||||||
Exploration expenses |
$ | 2,131,885 | $ | 9,368,212 | -77 | % | $ | 3,487,998 | $ | 11,908,144 | -71 | % | |||||||||
Depreciation, depletion and amortization |
$ | 1,618,899 | $ | 2,187,751 | -26 | % | $ | 3,412,735 | $ | 4,576,510 | -25 | % | |||||||||
Impairment of natural gas and oil properties |
$ | 42,995 | $ | | * | $ | 42,995 | $ | | * | |||||||||||
General and administrative expenses |
$ | 768,473 | $ | 659,751 | 16 | % | $ | 1,145,580 | $ | 1,073,093 | 7 | % | |||||||||
Interest expense |
$ | 115,235 | $ | 169,583 | -32 | % | $ | 279,645 | $ | 353,903 | -21 | % | |||||||||
Interest income |
$ | 5,250 | $ | 9,903 | * | $ | 19,666 | $ | 21,165 | * | |||||||||||
Gain on sale of marketable securities |
$ | 65,023 | $ | | * | $ | 710,322 | $ | | * | |||||||||||
Gain on sale of assets and other |
$ | 6,061,805 | $ | | * | $ | 7,116,410 | $ | 36,150 | * |
* | Not meaningful |
Three Months Ended December 31, 2003 Compared to Three Months Ended December 31, 2002
Natural Gas and Oil Sales. We reported natural gas and oil sales of approximately $6.0 million for the three months ended December 31, 2003, down from approximately $7.7 million reported for the three months ended December 31, 2002. This decrease was attributable to declines in natural gas and oil production. These production declines were partially offset by higher prices for natural gas and oil.
Natural Gas and Oil Production and Average Sales Prices. Our net natural gas production for the three months ended December 31, 2003 was approximately 11.4 million cubic feet of natural gas per
27
day, down from approximately 17.5 million cubic feet of natural gas per day for the three months ended December 31, 2002. Net oil production for the comparable periods decreased from 417 barrels of oil per day to 241 barrels of oil per day. This decrease was due to the natural decline in production from our south Texas properties. For the three months ended December 31, 2003, prices for natural gas and oil were $5.08 per Mcf and $30.10 per barrel, up from $4.21 per Mcf and $24.63 per barrel for the three months ended December 31, 2002.
Operating Expenses. Operating expenses, including severance taxes, for the three months ended December 31, 2003 were approximately $0.9 million, down from the $1.7 million reported for the three months ended December 31, 2002. Of the $0.9 million reported for the three months ended December 31, 2003, approximately $0.7 million was attributable to lease operating expense and ad valorem taxes and approximately $0.2 million was attributable to production and severance taxes. The Railroad Commission of Texas has extended the natural gas incentive allowing for severance tax reduction on tight sand gas wells. As a result, some of our south Texas Queen City formation properties are eligible for severance tax reduction. Operating expenses, including severance taxes, for the three months ended December 31, 2002 were approximately $1.7 million. Of the $1.7 million reported for the three months ended December 31, 2002, approximately $1.1 million was attributable to lease operating expense and ad valorem taxes, and approximately $0.6 million was attributable to production and severance taxes. The decrease in operating expenses for the three months ended December 31, 2003 was attributable to lower overall costs of operations resulting from lower production and lower severance taxes as a result of severance tax reductions.
Exploration Expense. We reported approximately $2.1 million of exploration expenses for the three months ended December 31, 2003. Of this amount, approximately $0.7 million was attributable to the cost to shoot, acquire and reprocess 3-D seismic data in south Texas, approximately $0.7 million was attributable to the cost to acquire and reprocess 3-D seismic data and leases offshore in the Gulf of Mexico and $0.7 million was related to an unsuccessful well drilled in south Texas during the period. We reported approximately $9.4 million of exploration expenses for the three months ended December 31, 2002. Of this amount, approximately $3.3 million was attributable to the cost to acquire 3-D seismic data offshore in the Gulf of Mexico, approximately $1.2 million was the cost to shoot 3-D seismic in south Texas and $0.5 million was the cost to acquire seismic data in south Texas. An additional $4.4 million was attributable to a reduction of our ownership in the net assets of Republic Exploration and Magnolia Offshore Exploration (see footnote 1 to Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements and see Critical Accounting Policies Principles of Consolidation under Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations).
Depreciation, Depletion and Amortization. Depreciation, depletion and amortization for the three months ended December 31, 2003 was approximately $1.6 million. For the three months ended December 31, 2002, we recorded approximately $2.2 million of depreciation, depletion and amortization. The decrease in depreciation, depletion and amortization was primarily the result of lower production from our south Texas Properties.
Impairment of Natural Gas and Oil Properties. For the six months ended December 31, 2003, we reported an impairment expense of approximately $43,000 resulting from a write down of one of our offshore Gulf of Mexico leases available for farm-out.
General and Administrative Expenses. General and administrative expenses for the three months ended December 31, 2003 were approximately $768,500, up from $659,800 for the three months ended December 31, 2002. Major components of general and administrative expenses for the three months
28
ended December 31, 2003 included approximately $362,500 in salaries and benefits (including $250,000 of bonus accrual), $39,300 in legal, accounting, engineering and other professional fees, $100,100 of office administration expenses, $89,500 of insurance costs, $50,300 related to the cost of expensing stock options and $126,600 of other expenses.
Components of general and administrative expense for the three months ended December 31, 2002 included approximately $128,000 in salaries and benefits, $381,700 in legal, accounting, engineering and other professional fees, $26,600 in insurance, $91,000 in office administration expenses and $32,500 in other expenses.
Interest Expense. We reported interest expense of approximately $0.1 million for the three months ended December 31, 2003, down from the approximate $0.2 million reported for the three months ended December 31, 2002. This decrease primarily was attributable to lower average levels of borrowings under our bank line of credit.
Gain on Sale of Marketable Securities. As part of the formation of Freeport LNG Development, L.P., Cheniere granted Contango warrants to purchase 300,000 shares of Cheniere common stock. In June and September 2003, Contango exercised the warrants, purchasing 300,000 shares of Cheniere common stock. As of December 31, 2003, the Company had sold the 300,000 shares of Cheniere common stock. For the three months ended December 31, 2003, we reported a gain on the sale of marketable securities of approximately $0.1 million (see footnote 7 to Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements).
Gain on Sale of Assets and Other. In December 2003, Contango and its 33.3%-owned subsidiary, Republic Exploration, sold their producing Gulf of Mexico leases for approximately $12.0 million. As a result of this sale, Contango recorded a gain of approximately $6.2 million as of December 31, 2003. Properties included in the sale were Eugene Island 110, Grand Isle 28 and High Island 25-L. Because the interests sold were unearned back-in working interests, Contango had no proved reserves attributable to the properties sold.
Six Months Ended December 31, 2003 Compared to Six Months Ended December 31, 2002
Natural Gas and Oil Sales. We reported natural gas and oil sales of approximately $14.2 million for the six months ended December 31, 2003, compared to approximately $14.7 million reported for the six months ended December 31, 2002. This decrease was attributable to declines in natural gas and oil production that were largely offset by higher prices for natural gas and oil.
Natural Gas and Oil Production and Average Sales Prices. Our net natural gas production for the six months ended December 31, 2003 was approximately 13.1 million cubic feet of natural gas per day, down from approximately 18.0 million cubic feet of natural gas per day for the six months ended December 31, 2002. Net oil production for the comparable periods decreased from 417 barrels of oil per day to 314 barrels of oil per day. This decrease was due to the natural decline in production from our south Texas properties. For the six months ended December 31, 2003, prices for natural gas and oil were $5.20 per Mcf and $29.57 per barrel, up from $3.84 per Mcf and $25.85 per barrel for the six months ended December 31, 2002.
Operating Expenses. Operating expenses, including severance taxes, for the six months ended December 31, 2003 were approximately $2.6 million, down from the $2.7 million reported for the six months ended December 31, 2002. Of the $2.6 million reported for the six months ended December 31,
29
2003, approximately $1.6 million was attributable to lease operating expense and ad valorem taxes, approximately $0.8 million was attributable to production and severance taxes and $0.2 million was attributable to workover costs. The Railroad Commission of Texas has extended the natural gas incentive allowing for severance tax reduction on tight sand gas wells. As a result, some of our south Texas Queen City formation properties are eligible for severance tax reduction.
Operating expenses, including severance taxes, for the six months ended December 31, 2002 were approximately $2.7 million. Of the $2.7 million reported for the six months ended December 31, 2002, approximately $1.7 million was attributable to lease operating expense and ad valorem taxes, and approximately $1.0 million was attributable to production and severance taxes. The decrease in operating expenses for the six months ended December 31, 2003 was attributable to lower overall costs of operations resulting from lower production and lower severance taxes as a result of severance tax reductions.
Exploration Expense. We reported approximately $3.5 million of exploration expenses for the six months ended December 31, 2003. Of this amount, approximately $1.7 million was attributable to the cost to shoot, acquire and reprocess 3-D seismic data in south Texas, approximately $1.0 million was attributable to the cost to acquire and reprocess 3-D seismic data offshore in the Gulf of Mexico and approximately $0.8 million was related to two unsuccessful wells drilled in south Texas during the period. For the six months ended December 31, 2002, we reported approximately $11.9 million of exploration expenses. Of this amount, approximately $4.2 million was attributable to the cost to acquire 3-D seismic data offshore in the Gulf of Mexico, approximately $2.2 million was the cost to shoot 3-D seismic in south Texas and approximately $0.7 million was the cost to acquire seismic data in south Texas. Of the remaining $4.8 million, approximately $4.4 million was attributable to a reduction of our ownership in the net assets of Republic Exploration and Magnolia Offshore Exploration and approximately $0.4 million was attributable to a dry hole drilled on our STEP properties (see footnote 1 to Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements and see Critical Accounting Policies Principles of Consolidation under Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations).
Depreciation, Depletion and Amortization. Depreciation, depletion and amortization for the six months ended December 31, 2003 was approximately $3.4 million. For the six months ended December 31, 2002, we recorded approximately $4.6 million of depreciation, depletion and amortization. The decrease in depreciation, depletion and amortization was primarily the result of lower production from our south Texas properties.
Impairment of Natural Gas and Oil Properties. For the six months ended December 31, 2003, we reported an impairment expense of approximately $43,000 resulting from a write down of one of our offshore Gulf of Mexico leases available for farm-out.
General and Administrative Expenses. General and administrative expenses for the six months ended December 31, 2003 were approximately $1.1 million, compared to approximately $1.1 million for the six months ended December 31, 2002. Major components of general and administrative expenses for the six months ended December 31, 2003 included approximately $471,400 in salaries and benefits (including $250,000 of bonus accrual), $95,500 in legal, accounting, engineering and other professional fees, $190,200 of office administration expenses, $113,100 of insurance costs, $77,400 related to the cost of expensing stock options and $197,900 of other expenses.
30
Components of general and administrative expense for the six months ended December 31, 2002 included approximately $252,100 in salaries and benefits, $488,100 in legal, accounting, engineering and other professional fees, $64,900 in insurance, $207,600 in office administration expenses and $60,400 in other expenses.
Interest Expense. We reported interest expense of approximately $0.3 million for the six months ended December 31, 2003, down from the $0.4 million reported for the six months ended December 31, 2002. This decrease primarily was attributable to lower average levels of borrowings under our bank line of credit.
Gain on Sale of Marketable Securities. As part of the formation of Freeport LNG Development, L.P., Cheniere granted Contango warrants to purchase 300,000 shares of Cheniere common stock. In June and September 2003, Contango exercised the warrants, purchasing 300,000 shares of Cheniere common stock. As of December 31, 2003, the Company had sold the 300,000 shares of Cheniere common stock. For the six months ended December 31, 2003, we reported a gain on the sale of marketable securities of approximately $0.7 million (see footnote 7 to Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements).
Gain on Sale of Assets and Other. For the six months ended December 31, 2003, we reported an approximate $7.1 million gain on the sale of assets from two transactions.
In September 2003, we sold properties within our south Texas exploration program consisting of 10 wells in Brooks County, Texas for $5.0 million, reporting a gain of approximately $0.9 million attributable to this producing property sale.
In December 2003, Contango and its 33.3%-owned subsidiary, Republic Exploration, sold their producing Gulf of Mexico leases for approximately $12.0 million. As a result of this sale, Contango recorded a gain of approximately $6.2 million as of December 31, 2003. Properties included in the sale were Eugene Island 110, Grand Isle 28 and High Island 25-L. Because the interests sold were unearned back-in working interests, Contango had no proved reserves attributable to the properties sold (see footnote 9 to Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements).
31
Production, Prices, Operating Expenses, EBITDAX and Other
The following table presents information regarding the production volumes, average sales prices received and average production costs associated with our sales of natural gas and oil for the periods indicated. Oil and condensate are compared with natural gas in terms of cubic feet of natural gas equivalents. One barrel of oil or condensate is the energy equivalent of six Mcf of natural gas.
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||
December 31, |
December 31, | |||||||||||
2003 |
2002 |
2003 |
2002 | |||||||||
Production: |
||||||||||||
Natural gas (thousand cubic feet) |
1,045,505 | 1,606,846 | 2,408,357 | 3,319,914 | ||||||||
Oil and condensate (barrel) |
22,160 | 38,398 | 57,766 | 76,645 | ||||||||
Total (thousand cubic feet equivalent) |
1,178,465 | 1,837,234 | 2,754,953 | 3,779,784 | ||||||||
Natural gas (thousand cubic feet per day) |
11,364 | 17,466 | 13,089 | 18,043 | ||||||||
Oil and condensate (barrels per day) |
241 | 417 | 314 | 417 | ||||||||
Total (thousand cubic feet equivalent per day) |
12,810 | 19,968 | 14,973 | 20,545 | ||||||||
Average sales price: |
||||||||||||
Natural gas (per thousand cubic feet) |
$ | 5.08 | $ | 4.21 | $ | 5.20 | $ | 3.84 | ||||
Oil and condensate (per barrel) |
$ | 30.10 | $ | 24.63 | $ | 29.57 | $ | 25.85 | ||||
Total (per thousand cubic feet equivalent) |
$ | 5.07 | $ | 4.20 | $ | 5.17 | $ | 3.90 | ||||
Selected data per Mcfe: |
||||||||||||
Production and severance taxes |
$ | 0.22 | $ | 0.31 | $ | 0.31 | $ | 0.27 | ||||
Lease operating expenses |
$ | 0.56 | $ | 0.60 | $ | 0.63 | $ | 0.45 | ||||
General and administrative expenses |
$ | 0.65 | $ | 0.36 | $ | 0.42 | $ | 0.28 | ||||
Depreciation, depletion and amortization of natural gas and oil properties |
$ | 1.35 | $ | 1.17 | $ | 1.22 | $ | 1.19 | ||||
EBITDAX (1) |
$ | 10,397,907 | $ | 5,190,516 | $ | 18,403,221 | $ | 10,777,690 |
(1) | EBITDAX represents earnings before interest, income taxes, depreciation, depletion and amortization, impairment expenses, exploration expenses, including gain (loss) from hedging activities and sale of assets. We have reported EBITDAX because we believe EBITDAX is a measure commonly reported and widely used by investors as an indicator of a companys operating performance and ability to incur and service debt. We believe EBITDAX assists investors in comparing a companys performance on a consistent basis without regard to depreciation, depletion and amortization, impairment of natural gas and oil properties and exploration expenses, which can vary significantly depending upon accounting methods. EBITDAX is not a calculation based on U.S. generally accepted accounting principles and should not be considered an alternative to net income (loss) in measuring our performance or used as an exclusive measure of cash flow because it does not consider the impact of working capital growth, capital expenditures, debt principal reductions and other sources and uses of cash, which are disclosed in our statements of cash flows. Investors should carefully consider the specific items included in our computation of EBITDAX. While we have disclosed our EBITDAX to permit a more complete comparative analysis of our operating performance and debt servicing ability relative to other companies, investors should be cautioned that EBITDAX as reported by us may not be comparable in all instances to EBITDAX as reported by other companies. EBITDAX amounts may not be fully available for managements discretionary use, due to requirements to conserve funds for capital expenditures, debt service, preferred stock dividends and other commitments. |
32
A reconciliation of EBITDAX to income (loss) from operations for the periods indicated is presented below.
Three Months Ended December 31, |
Six Months Ended December 31, |
|||||||||||||
2003 |
2002 |
2003 |
2002 |
|||||||||||
Income (loss) from operations |
$ | 477,300 | $ | (6,365,447 | ) | $ | 3,632,761 | $ | (5,743,114 | ) | ||||
Exploration expenses |
2,131,885 | 9,368,212 | 3,487,998 | 11,908,144 | ||||||||||
Depreciation, depletion and amortization |
1,618,899 | 2,187,751 | 3,412,735 | 4,576,510 | ||||||||||
Impairment of natural gas and oil properties |
42,995 | | 42,995 | | ||||||||||
Gain on sale of marketable securities |
65,023 | | 710,322 | | ||||||||||
Gain on sale of assets and other |
6,061,805 | | 7,116,410 | 36,150 | ||||||||||
EBITDAX |
$ | 10,397,907 | $ | 5,190,516 | $ | 18,403,221 | $ | 10,777,690 | ||||||
Capital Resources and Liquidity
Cash Inflows
During the six months ended December 31, 2003, we funded our activities with cash on hand, internally generated cash flow, borrowings under our bank line of credit, the sale of producing properties and the sale of our Series C preferred stock. We reported total revenues for the three and six months ended December 31, 2003 of approximately $6.0 million and $14.3 million, respectively. EBITDAX for the three and six months ended December 31, 2003 was approximately $10.4 million and $18.4 million, respectively. Between June 30, 2003 and December 31, 2003, accounts receivable decreased from approximately $6.0 million to $4.1 million. This decrease was attributable to the inclusion at June 30, 2003 of two months of accounts receivable from our Brooks County, Texas production, which was sold in September 2003, and to natural declines in natural gas and oil production.
In September 2003, we completed the sale of certain reserves in Brooks County, Texas for $5.0 million and recorded a gain of approximately $900,000 for the six months ended of December 31, 2003. Proved reserves were 1.5 Bcfe and accounted for approximately $5.0 million of the Companys discounted present value at 10% per annum as of June 30, 2003. Our current production rate following the sale of these properties is approximately 15,000 MMbtue per day. At anticipated production levels and current commodity price levels, we expect to have EBITDAX of approximately $1.5 to $ 2.0 million per month through June 2004.
In December 2003, Contango and Republic Exploration sold their producing Gulf of Mexico leases for approximately $12.0 million. As a result of this sale, Contango recorded a gain of approximately $6.2 million as of December 31, 2003. Properties included in the sale were Eugene Island 110, Grand Isle 28 and High Island 25-L. Contango received approximately $3.7 million in cash proceeds for its portion of the sale. Republic Exploration received cash proceeds of approximately $8.3 million for its portion of the sale. Republic Exploration subsequently made distributions of $3.0 million to its members, including a $1.0 million distribution to Contango. After payment of these distributions and including cash already on hand, Republic Exploration has total cash of approximately $8.7 million, available for future lease acquisitions and exploration drilling.
In December 2003, we sold $8.0 million of our Series C preferred stock to a group of private institutional investors. The Series C preferred stock is perpetual and is convertible at the holders election at any time into shares of Contango common stock at a price of $6.00 per share. The dividend
33
on the Series C Preferred Stock can be paid quarterly in cash at a rate of 6.0% per annum, or $480,000, or paid-in-kind at a rate of 7.5% per annum. We have filed a shelf registration with the Securities and Exchange Commission, which has become effective, covering the 1,333,328 shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of the Series C preferred stock, together with an additional 1,417,685 shares of common stock that are issuable upon the exercise of certain stock options and warrants or may be issuable as a result of payment of the Series C preferred stock dividends in kind.
In January 2004, we converted all of the outstanding shares of our Series A and Series B preferred stock into 2,136,364 shares of common stock. The Series A and Series B preferred stock paid an 8.0% annual dividend. The conversion of these shares into common stock will save us $600,000 annually in preferred dividends. We have agreed to file a shelf registration statement covering these 2,136,364 shares of common stock, plus an additional 1,851,852 shares of common stock owned by Trust Company of the West, the holder of the Series A Preferred Stock.
As part of the formation of Freeport LNG Development, L.P., Cheniere granted Contango a warrant to purchase 300,000 shares of Cheniere common stock. In June and September 2003, we exercised the warrant, purchasing 300,000 shares of Cheniere common stock. As of December 31, 2003, the 300,000 shares had been sold for a total realized gain of approximately $1.2 million.
Cash Outflows
In 2003, we participated in a 3-D seismic shoot in Jim Hogg and Starr Counties, Texas, covering approximately 100 square miles at a net cost to us of approximately $2.7 million. The processing and evaluation of this data is now complete. We have drilled four shallow wells, three successful and one dry. We also drilled a Queen City exploratory well in November 2003 that is currently producing. Based on this well, we expect to drill an additional Queen City well, with an estimated net dry hole cost of approximately $400,000.
In August 2003, Contango, along with JEX, entered into a participation agreement with several other parties to identify and evaluate natural gas and oil exploration prospects in a prospect area covering approximately 32,000 acres in Dimmit and Zavala Counties, Texas. Our share of prospect identification is expected to cost approximately $1.0 million. We currently have advanced approximately $220,000 as our share of prospect identification costs.
In August 2003, Contango Offshore Exploration and Republic Exploration participated in the Gulf of Mexico Lease Sale #187. Republic Exploration was high bidder on one lease block, and Contango Offshore Exploration was high bidder on four lease blocks, with winning bids totaling $1.5 million. Contango expects that Republic Exploration and Contango Offshore Exploration will participate in the Central Gulf of Mexico lease sale to be held in March 2004.
We recently drilled a Queen City exploratory well with Alta Resources in Jim Hogg County, Texas (45% working interest) that resulted in a dry hole. Our cost to drill and complete this well was approximately $700,000.
In October 2003, Contango and Alta Resources completed a 3-D seismic shoot covering approximately 40 square miles in southern Duval County, Texas. The net cost to us was approximately $1.7 million. Two prospects have been identified, one shallow and a Queen City prospect. The estimated dry hole cost of these two wells is approximately $500,000, with drilling expected to start in
34
the April 2004 timeframe. If this play develops, we would expect to drill another three to five development wells with drilling expenditures in the $2.1 to $3.5 million range.
We have recently agreed to participate with Alta Resources in a prospect located onshore in Matagorda County, Texas. The dry hole cost is estimated at approximately $1.4 million, of which our share will be approximately $700,000. After casing point, we will own an approximate 34% working interest in the well. Drilling is expected to commence in the April 2004 timeframe.
In October 2003, we agreed to participate with Coastline in any exploration prospects that may be generated in a prospect area in Kenedy County, Texas. If this play develops, we could drill three to five exploratory wells with a dry hole cost in the $1.0 to $2.0 million range.
Contango and TPIC have agreed to pursue an oil exploration prospect in the Aquitaine Basin in southwestern France. The initial well will be an oil test to be drilled to approximately 10,500 feet. The dry hole cost of this well is estimated at approximately $4.0 million. Contangos dry hole exposure is estimated at approximately $800,000. The assignment of our 20% interest in the exploration prospect and approval for the well are subject to French government approval, which is expected within the next 90 to 120 days. We will develop our future plans in France based on the results of this well.
In March 2003, we exercised an option to purchase from Cheniere Energy, Inc. a 10% limited partnership interest in Freeport LNG Development, L.P., a limited partnership formed to develop a LNG receiving terminal in Freeport, Texas. Our commitment is $2.3 million, $1,650,000 of which has been paid as of February 13, 2004. The balance of $683,333 is being paid in $100,000 monthly payments in March and April 2004, with an $83,333 payment due in May 2004 and a final payment of $400,000 due upon receipt of Federal Energy Regulatory Commission approval for the project.
We believe that our cash on hand, our anticipated cash flow from operations and funds available under our credit facility will be adequate to satisfy planned capital expenditures over the next 12 months. We may seek additional equity, sell assets or seek other financing to fund possible acquisitions and an expanded exploration program, and to take advantage of other opportunities that may become available. The availability of such funds will depend upon prevailing market conditions and other factors over which we have no control, as well as our financial condition and results of operations.
Credit Facility
Our credit facility is a secured, reducing revolving line of credit with Guaranty Bank, FSB, secured by our natural gas and oil reserves. On February 13, 2004, the borrowing base was redetermined to $25.0 million in two tranches. Tranche A provides for a borrowing base of $23.0 million and matures on June 29, 2006. This amount reduces by $520,000 per month the first day of each month beginning March 1, 2004. Borrowings under Tranche A bear interest, at our option, at either (i) LIBOR plus two percent (2%) or (ii) the banks base rate plus one-fourth percent (1/4%) per annum. Additionally, we pay a quarterly commitment fee of three-eighths percent (3/8%) per annum on the average availability of Tranche A. Tranche B provides for a borrowing base of $2.0 million and matures on August 1, 2004. Borrowings under Tranche B will reduce by $520,000 per month the first day of each month following the date of borrowing, with the final reduction on August 1, 2004. Further, any amounts borrowed and repaid under Tranche B cannot be reborrowed. Borrowings under Tranche B bear interest, at the Companys option, at either (i) LIBOR plus three percent (3%) or (ii) the banks base rate plus three-quarters percent (3/4%) per annum. Additionally, we pay a quarterly commitment fee of one-half percent (1/2%) per annum on the average availability under Tranche B. As of December 31, 2003, the
35
Companys long-term debt totaled $3,606,900, all of which was outstanding under Tranche A of the line of credit.
The hydrocarbon borrowing base is subject to semi-annual redetermination based primarily on the value of our proved reserves. The credit facility requires the maintenance of certain ratios, including those related to working capital, funded debt to EBITDAX, and debt service coverage, as defined in the credit facility. Additionally, the credit facility contains certain negative covenants that, among other things, restrict or limit our ability to incur indebtedness, sell assets, pay dividends and reacquire or otherwise acquire or redeem capital stock. Failure to maintain required financial ratios or comply with the credit facilitys covenants can result in a default and acceleration of all indebtedness under the credit facility.
As December 31, 2003, $3.6 million was outstanding under the credit facility, and we were in compliance with all financial covenants and ratios. On February 13, 2004, we had approximately $250,000 in cash on hand, no borrowing under our credit facility or any other long-term indebtedness and $25.0 million of unused bank borrowing capacity.
Natural Gas and Oil Reserves
The following table presents our estimated net proved, developed producing natural gas and oil reserves and the pre-tax net present value of our reserves at December 31, 2003, based on a reserve report generated by W.D. Von Gonten & Co. The pre-tax net present value is not intended to represent the current market value of the estimated natural gas and oil reserves we own.
The pre-tax net present value of future cash flows attributable to our proved developed producing reserves as of December 31, 2003 was determined by the December 31, 2003 prices of $5.76 per MMbtu for natural gas at the Houston Ship Channel and $32.52 per barrel of oil at West Texas Intermediate Posting, in each case before adjusting for basis and transportation costs. Our proved reserves are 91% natural gas.
Proved Reserves as of December 31, 2003 | |||
Natural gas (MMcf) |
19,516 | ||
Oil and condensate (MBbls) |
317 | ||
Total proved reserves (MMcfe) |
21,418 | ||
Pre-tax net present value (SEC guidelines) |
$ | 70,201,648 |
The process of estimating natural gas and oil reserves is complex. It requires various assumptions, including natural gas and oil prices, drilling and operating expenses, capital expenditures, taxes and availability of funds. Our third party engineers must project production rates and timing of development expenditures, as well as analyze available geological, geophysical, production and engineering data. The extent, quality and reliability of this data can vary. Therefore, estimates of natural gas and oil reserves are inherently imprecise. Actual future production, natural gas and oil prices, revenues, taxes, development expenditures, operating expenses and quantities of recoverable natural gas and oil reserves most likely will vary from estimates. Any significant variance could materially affect the estimated quantities and net present value of reserves. In addition, our third party engineers may adjust estimates of proved reserves to reflect production history, results of exploration and development,
36
prevailing natural gas and oil prices and other factors, many of which are beyond our control. Because most of our reserve estimates are not based on a lengthy production history and are calculated using volumetric analysis, these estimates are less reliable than estimates based on a lengthy production history.
It should not be assumed that the pre-tax net present value is the current market value of our estimated natural gas and oil reserves. In accordance with requirements of the Securities and Exchange Commission, we base the estimated discounted future net cash flows from proved reserves on prices and costs on the date of the estimate. Actual future prices and costs may differ materially from those used in the present value estimate.
Item 3. | Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk |
Commodity Risk. Our major commodity price risk exposure is to the prices received for our natural gas and oil production. Realized commodity prices received for our production are the spot prices applicable to natural gas and crude oil. Prices received for natural gas and oil are volatile, unpredictable and are beyond our control. For the six months ended December 31, 2003, a 10% fluctuation in the prices received for natural gas and oil production would have had an approximate $1.4 million impact on our revenues.
Item 4. | Controls and Procedures |
Kenneth R. Peak, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, has evaluated our disclosure controls and procedures as of December 31, 2003. These controls and procedures are designed to ensure that all of the information required to be disclosed by us in our periodic reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Commission) is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified by the Commission and that the information is communicated to the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer on a timely basis. Based on his evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were suitable and effective.
PART II - OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. | Legal Proceedings |
None.
Item 2. | Changes in Securities and Use of Proceeds |
On December 12, 2003, we sold $8.0 million of our Series C preferred stock to a group of private institutional investors. The sale of the Series C preferred stock was exempt from registration pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933 and Regulation D promulgated thereunder, as a transaction not involving a public offering. The Series C preferred stock is perpetual, is senior to our common stock and is convertible at any time into shares of our common stock at a price of $6.00 per share. The dividend on the Series C preferred stock can be paid quarterly in cash at a rate of 6.0% per annum or paid-in-kind at a rate of 7.5% per annum. We have filed a shelf registration with the Securities and Exchange Commission, which has become effective, covering the 1,333,328 shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of the Series C preferred stock, together with an additional 1,417,685 shares of
37
common stock that are issuable upon the exercise of certain stock options and warrants or may be issuable as a result of payment of the Series C preferred stock dividends in kind.
We used the net proceeds of this offering to repay indebtedness under our bank revolving credit facility. We intend to use the additional funds made available under our bank credit facility, together with cash flow from operations, to fund natural gas and oil exploration, development and production, to fund offshore lease acquisitions, to fund 3-D seismic shoots and acquisitions, to fund our investment in our proposed Freeport, Texas LNG receiving terminal and for general corporate purposes.
Item 3. | Defaults Upon Senior Securities |
None.
Item 4. | Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders |
None.
Item 5. | Other Information |
None.
Item 6. | Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K |
(a) | Exhibits: |
The following is a list of exhibits filed as part of this Form 10-Q. Where so indicated by footnote, exhibits, which were previously filed, are incorporated by reference.
Exhibit Number |
Description | |
3.1 | Certificate of Incorporation of Contango Oil & Gas Company, a Delaware corporation. (7) | |
3.2 | Bylaws of Contango Oil & Gas Company, a Delaware corporation. (7) | |
3.3 | Agreement of Plan of Merger of Contango Oil & Gas Company, a Delaware corporation, and Contango Oil & Gas Company, a Nevada corporation. (7) | |
3.4 | Amendment to the Certificate of Incorporation of Contango Oil & Gas Company, a Delaware corporation. (15) | |
4.1 | Facsimile of common stock certificate of the Company. (1) | |
4.2 | Certificate of Designations, Preferences and Relative Rights and Limitations for Series A Senior Convertible Cumulative Preferred Stock of Contango Oil & Gas Company, a Delaware corporation. (7) | |
4.3 | Certificate of Designations, Preferences and Relative Rights and Limitations for Series B Senior Convertible Cumulative Preferred Stock of Contango Oil & Gas Company, a Delaware corporation. (7) | |
4.4 | Certificate of Designations, Preferences and Relative Rights and Limitations for Series C Senior Convertible Cumulative Preferred Stock of Contango Oil & Gas Company, a Delaware corporation. (19) | |
10.1 | Agreement, dated effective as of September 1, 1999, between Contango Oil & Gas Company and Juneau Exploration, L.L.C. (2) | |
10.2 | Securities Purchase Agreement between Contango Oil & Gas Company and Trust Company |
38
of the West, dated December 29, 1999. (12) | ||
10.3 | Warrant to Purchase Common Stock between Contango Oil & Gas Company and Trust Company of the West, dated December 29, 1999. (3) | |
10.4 | Co-Sale Agreement among Kenneth R. Peak, Contango Oil & Gas Company and Trust Company of the West, dated December 29, 1999. (3) | |
10.5 | Securities Purchase Agreement dated August 24, 2000 by and between Contango Oil & Gas Company and Trust Company of the West. (4) | |
10.6 | Securities Purchase Agreement dated August 24, 2000 by and between Contango Oil & Gas Company and Fairfield Industries Incorporated. (4) | |
10.7 | Securities Purchase Agreement dated August 24, 2000 by and between Contango Oil & Gas Company and Juneau Exploration Company, L.L.C. (4) | |
10.8 | Amendment dated August 14, 2000 to agreement between Contango Oil & Gas Company and Juneau Exploration Company, LLC. dated effective as of September 1, 1999. (5) | |
10.9 | Securities Purchase Agreement dated September 27, 2000 by and between Contango Oil & Gas Company and Aquila Energy Capital Corporation. (6) | |
10.10 | Credit Agreement between Contango Oil & Gas Company and Guaranty Bank, FSB, dated June 29, 2001. (8) | |
10.11 | First Amendment dated as of January 8, 2002 to Credit Agreement between Contango Oil & Gas Company and Guaranty Bank, FSB, dated June 29, 2001. (9) | |
10.12 | Asset Purchase Agreement by and among Juneau Exploration, L.P. and Contango Oil & Gas Company dated January 4, 2002. (9) | |
10.13 | Asset Purchase Agreement by and among Mark A. Stephens, John Miller, The Hunter Revocable Trust, Linda G. Ferszt, Scott Archer and the Archer Revocable Trust and Contango Oil & Gas Company dated January 9, 2002. (10) | |
10.14 | Second Amendment dated as of February 13, 2002 to Credit Agreement between Contango Oil & Gas Company and Guaranty Bank, FSB, dated June 29, 2001. (11) | |
10.15 | Waiver dated as of March 25, 2002 to Credit Agreement between Contango Oil & Gas Company and Guaranty Bank, FSB, dated June 29, 2001. (11) | |
10.16 | Option Purchase Agreement between Contango Oil & Gas Company and Cheniere Energy, Inc. dated June 4, 2002. (13) | |
10.17 | Waiver and Third Amendment dated as of April 26, 2002 to Credit Agreement between Contango Oil & Gas Company and Guaranty Bank, FSB, dated June 29, 2001. (14) | |
10.18 | Fourth Amendment dated as of September 9, 2002 to Credit Agreement between Contango Oil & Gas Company and Guaranty Bank, FSB, dated June 29, 2001. (14) | |
10.19 | Fifth Amendment, effective June 1, 2003, to Credit Agreement between Contango Oil & Gas Company and Guaranty Bank, FSB, dated June 29, 2001. (16) | |
10.20 | Sixth Amendment, effective September 1, 2003, to Credit Agreement between Contango Oil & Gas Company and Guaranty Bank, FSB, dated June 29, 2001. (18) | |
10.21 | Seventh Amendment, effective September 1, 2003, to Credit Agreement between Contango Oil & Gas Company and Guaranty Bank, FSB, dated June 29, 2001. | |
10.22 | Securities Purchase Agreement dated December 12, 2003 by and between Contango Oil & Gas Company and the Purchasers Named Therein. (19) | |
10.23 | Freeport LNG Development, L.P. Amended and Restated Limited Partnership Agreement dated February 27, 2003. (20) | |
10.24 | Partnership Purchase Agreement among Contango Sundance, Inc., Contango Oil & Gas, Cheniere LNG, Inc. and Cheniere Energy, Inc. dated March 1, 2003. (20) | |
10.25 | First Amendment, dated December 19, 2003, to Freeport LNG Development, L.P. Amended and Restated Limited Partnership Agreement dated February 27, 2003. (20) |
39
14.1 | Code of Ethics. (17) | |
23.1 | Consent of W.D. Von Gonten & Co. | |
31.1 | Certification required by Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. | |
32.1 | Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
| Filed herewith. |
1. | Filed as an exhibit to the Companys Form 10-SB Registration Statement, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 16, 1998. |
2. | Filed as an exhibit to the Companys Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended December 31, 1999, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 11, 1999. |
3. | Filed as an exhibit to the Companys Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended December 31, 1999, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 14, 2000. |
4. | Filed as an exhibit to the Companys report on Form 8-K, dated August 24, 2000, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission of September 8, 2000. |
5. | Filed as an exhibit to the Companys annual report on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2000, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 27, 2000. |
6. | Filed as an exhibit to the Companys report on Form 8-K, dated September 27, 2000, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 3, 2000. |
7. | Filed as an exhibit to the Companys report on Form 8-K, dated December 1, 2000, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 15, 2000. |
8. | Filed as an exhibit to the Companys annual report on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2001, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 21, 2001. |
9. | Filed as an exhibit to the Companys report on Form 8-K, dated January 4, 2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 8, 2002. |
10. | Filed as an exhibit to the Companys Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 14, 2002. |
11. | Filed as an exhibit to the Companys report filed on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2002, dated May 2, 2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. |
12. | Filed as an exhibit to the Companys Form 10-QSB/A for the quarter ended December 31, 1999, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 4, 2002. |
13. | Filed as an exhibit to the Companys Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No. 333-89900) as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 14, 2002. |
14. | Filed as an exhibit to the Companys annual report on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 26, 2002. |
15. | Filed as an exhibit to the Companys report filed on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended December 31, 2002, dated November 14, 2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. |
16. | Filed as an exhibit to the Companys report on Form 8-K, dated June 17, 2003, 2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 18, 2003. |
17. | Filed as an exhibit to the Companys annual report on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 22, 2003. |
18. | Filed as an exhibit to the Companys report filed on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2003, dated November 12, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. |
19. | Filed as an exhibit to the Companys report on Form 8-K, dated December 12, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 17, 2003. |
20. | Filed as an exhibit to the Companys report on Form 8-K, dated December 19, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 23, 2003. |
40
(b) | Report on Form 8-K: |
Form 8-K, event date January 26, 2004 (Item 7), announcing the Companys election to convert the Series A and Series B preferred stock.
Form 8-K, event date December 19, 2003 (Items 5 and 7), reporting the signing of an agreement between ConocoPhillips and Freeport LNG Development, L.P., a partnership in which Contango has a 10% limited partnership interest.
Form 8-K, event date December 12, 2003 (Item 5 and 7), reporting the Companys sale of 1,600 shares of its Series C cumulative convertible preferred stock to a group of private investors for gross proceeds of $8,000,000.
Form 8-K, event date December 9, 2003 (Item 7), announcing that the Company and its 33.3%-owned subsidiary, Republic Exploration LLC, had entered into an agreement to sell all of their currently producing Gulf of Mexico leases to private interests for approximately $12.0 million.
Form 8-K, event date November 11, 2003 (Item 7), reporting the results for the quarter ended September 30, 2003.
Form 8-K, event date February 13, 2004 (Items 5, 7 and 12), reporting the results for the three and six months ended December 31, 2003.
41
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereto duly authorized.
CONTANGO OIL & GAS COMPANY | ||||||||
Date: February 13, 2003 | By: | /s/ KENNETH R. PEAK | ||||||
Kenneth R. Peak Chairman and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive and Financial Officer) | ||||||||
Date: February 13, 2003 | By: | /s/ LESIA BAUTINA | ||||||
Lesia Bautina Vice President and Controller (Principal Accounting Officer) |
42