Back to GetFilings.com



Table of Contents

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 


 

FORM 10-Q

 


 

x QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

For the Quarterly Period Ended December 31, 2003

 

or

 

¨ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

For the Transition Period From              to             

 

Commission File Number 0-14278

 


 

MICROSOFT CORPORATION

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 


 

Washington   91-1144442

(State or other jurisdiction of

incorporation or organization)

 

(I.R.S. Employer

Identification No.)

One Microsoft Way, Redmond, Washington   98052-6399
(Address of principal executive office)   (Zip Code)

 

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (425) 882-8080

 


 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  x    No  ¨

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    Yes  x    No  ¨

 

The number of shares outstanding of the registrant’s common stock as of January 31, 2004 was 10,794,392,603.

 



Table of Contents

MICROSOFT CORPORATION

 

FORM 10-Q

 

For the Quarter Ended December 31, 2003

 

INDEX

 

                   Page

Part I.

 

Financial Information

    
    Item 1.   

Financial Statements

    
         a)   

Income Statements for the Three and Six Months Ended December 31, 2002 and 2003

   1
         b)   

Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2003 and December 31, 2003

   2
         c)   

Cash Flows Statements for the Three and Six Months Ended December 31, 2002 and 2003

   3
         d)   

Stockholders’ Equity Statements for the Three and Six Months Ended December 31, 2002 and 2003

   4
         e)   

Notes to Financial Statements

   5
         f)   

Independent Accountants’ Report

   17
    Item 2.   

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

   18
    Item 3.   

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

   32
    Item 4.   

Controls and Procedures

   33

Part II

 

Other Information

    
    Item 1.   

Legal Proceedings

   34
    Item 4.   

Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

   34
    Item 6.   

Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K

   35

Signature

   36


Table of Contents

Part I. Financial Information

 

Item 1. Financial Statements

 

MICROSOFT CORPORATION

 

INCOME STATEMENTS

(In millions, except earnings per share)(Unaudited)

 

     Three Months Ended
Dec. 31


    Six Months Ended
Dec. 31


 
     2002(1)

    2003

    2002(1)

    2003

 

Revenue

   $ 8,541     $ 10,153     $ 16,287     $ 18,368  

Operating expenses:

                                

Cost of revenue

     2,137       2,344       3,481       3,824  

Research and development

     1,515       2,971       3,222       4,582  

Sales and marketing

     2,159       2,467       3,574       3,972  

General and administrative

     497       896       749       1,367  
    


 


 


 


Total operating expenses

     6,308       8,678       11,026       13,745  
    


 


 


 


Operating income

     2,233       1,475       5,261       4,623  

Losses on equity investees and other

     (12 )     (5 )     (34 )     (15 )

Investment income

     375       842       416       1,605  
    


 


 


 


Income before income taxes

     2,596       2,312       5,643       6,213  

Provision for income taxes

     731       763       1,737       2,050  
    


 


 


 


Net income

   $ 1,865     $ 1,549     $ 3,906     $ 4,163  
    


 


 


 


Earnings per share:

                                

Basic

   $ 0.17     $ 0.14     $ 0.36     $ 0.39  
    


 


 


 


Diluted

   $ 0.17     $ 0.14     $ 0.36     $ 0.38  
    


 


 


 


Weighted average shares outstanding:

                                

Basic

     10,703       10,810       10,711       10,800  
    


 


 


 


Diluted

     10,846       10,899       10,916       10,908  
    


 


 


 



(1) The three and six months ended December 31, 2002 results have been restated to reflect a two-for-one stock split in February 2003 and for retroactive adoption of the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS 123, Accounting for Stock Based Compensation, as discussed in Note 3.

 

 

See accompanying notes.

 

1


Table of Contents

MICROSOFT CORPORATION

 

BALANCE SHEETS

(In millions)(Unaudited)

 

    

June 30

2003(1)


  

Dec. 31

2003


Assets

             

Current assets:

             

Cash and equivalents

   $ 6,438    $ 6,149

Short-term investments

     42,610      46,628
    

  

Total cash and short-term investments

     49,048      52,777

Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $242 and $187

     5,196      5,608

Inventories

     640      621

Deferred income taxes

     2,506      2,068

Other

     1,583      1,326
    

  

Total current assets

     58,973      62,400

Property and equipment, net

     2,223      2,178

Equity and other investments

     13,692      14,901

Goodwill

     3,128      3,110

Intangible assets, net

     384      345

Deferred income taxes

     2,161      1,259

Other long-term assets

     1,171      1,744
    

  

Total assets

   $ 81,732    $ 85,937
    

  

Liabilities and stockholders’ equity

             

Current liabilities:

             

Accounts payable

   $ 1,573    $ 1,360

Accrued compensation

     1,416      1,143

Income taxes

     2,044      3,500

Short-term unearned revenue

     7,225      6,229

Other

     1,716      1,695
    

  

Total current liabilities

     13,974      13,927

Long-term unearned revenue

     1,790      1,623

Other long-term liabilities

     1,056      1,044

Commitments and contingencies

             

Stockholders’ equity:

             

Common stock and paid-in capital—shares authorized 24,000; outstanding 10,771 and 10,789

     49,234      52,676

Retained earnings, including accumulated other comprehensive income of $1,840 and $2,195

     15,678      16,667
    

  

Total stockholders’ equity

     64,912      69,343
    

  

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity

   $ 81,732    $ 85,937
    

  


(1) The June 30, 2003 balance sheet has been restated for retroactive adoption of the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS 123, Accounting for Stock Based Compensation, as discussed in Note 3.

 

See accompanying notes.

 

2


Table of Contents

MICROSOFT CORPORATION

 

CASH FLOWS STATEMENTS

(In millions)(Unaudited)

 

     Three Months Ended
Dec. 31


   

Six Months Ended

Dec. 31


 
     2002(1)

    2003

    2002(1)

    2003

 

Operations

                                

Net income

   $ 1,865     $ 1,549     $ 3,906     $ 4,163  

Depreciation, amortization, and other noncash items

     275       300       548       628  

Stock based compensation

     1,058       3,232       2,106       4,247  

Net recognized (gains)/losses on investments

     140       (321 )     615       (600 )

Stock option income tax benefits

     296       148       661       637  

Deferred income taxes

     (592 )     (985 )     (1,531 )     (979 )

Unearned revenue

     2,500       2,774       6,593       4,988  

Recognition of unearned revenue

     (2,795 )     (3,166 )     (5,538 )     (6,149 )

Accounts receivable

     (349 )     (1,004 )     402       (328 )

Other current assets

     404       607       367       293  

Other long-term assets

     (50 )     55       (22 )     41  

Other current liabilities

     (375 )     1,256       422       980  

Other long-term liabilities

     390       129       410       77  
    


 


 


 


Net cash from operations

     2,767       4,574       8,939       7,998  
    


 


 


 


Financing

                                

Common stock issued

     365       189       904       884  

Common stock repurchased

     (936 )     (730 )     (4,433 )     (1,775 )

Common stock dividend

     —         (1,729 )     —         (1,729 )
    


 


 


 


Net cash used for financing

     (571 )     (2,270 )     (3,529 )     (2,620 )
    


 


 


 


Investing

                                

Additions to property and equipment

     (276 )     (172 )     (436 )     (339 )

Acquisition of companies, net of cash acquired

     (9 )     —         (879 )     (4 )

Purchases of investments

     (19,406 )     (22,377 )     (46,091 )     (46,975 )

Maturities of investments

     3,302       825       6,532       3,475  

Sales of investments

     14,370       19,775       37,958       38,146  
    


 


 


 


Net cash used for investing

     (2,019 )     (1,949 )     (2,916 )     (5,697 )
    


 


 


 


Net change in cash and equivalents

     177       355       2,494       (319 )

Effect of exchange rates on cash and equivalents

     37       26       42       30  

Cash and equivalents, beginning of period

     5,338       5,768       3,016       6,438  
    


 


 


 


Cash and equivalents, end of period

   $ 5,552     $ 6,149     $ 5,552     $ 6,149  
    


 


 


 



(1) The three and six months ended December 31, 2002 cash flows statements have been restated for retroactive adoption of SFAS 123, Accounting for Stock Based Compensation, as discussed in Note 3.

 

 

See accompanying notes.

 

3


Table of Contents

MICROSOFT CORPORATION

 

STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY STATEMENTS

(In millions)(Unaudited)

 

    

Three Months Ended

Dec. 31


   

Six Months Ended

Dec. 31


 
     2002(1)

    2003

    2002(1)

    2003

 

Common stock and paid-in capital

                                

Balance, beginning of period

   $ 44,235     $ 51,298     $ 41,845     $ 49,234  

Common stock issued

     385       174       1,705       869  

Common stock repurchased

     (114 )     (90 )     (457 )     (225 )

Stock based compensation expense, net of income taxes

     1,354       1,294       2,767       2,798  
    


 


 


 


Balance, end of period

     45,860       52,676       45,860       52,676  
    


 


 


 


Retained earnings

                                

Balance, beginning of period

     12,282       15,382       12,997       15,678  
    


 


 


 


Net income

     1,865       1,549       3,906       4,163  

Other comprehensive income:

                                

Net gains/(losses) on derivative instruments

     (22 )     (4 )     46       13  

Net unrealized investments gains/(losses)

     24       403       (140 )     267  

Translation adjustments and other

     36       77       31       75  
    


 


 


 


Comprehensive income

     1,903       2,025       3,843       4,518  

Common stock dividend

     —         —         —         (1,729 )

Common stock repurchased

     (886 )     (740 )     (3,541 )     (1,800 )
    


 


 


 


Balance, end of period

     13,299       16,667       13,299       16,667  
    


 


 


 


Total stockholders’ equity

   $ 59,159     $ 69,343     $ 59,159     $ 69,343  
    


 


 


 



(1) The three and six months ended December 31, 2002 stockholders’ equity statements have been restated for retroactive adoption of SFAS 123, Accounting for Stock Based Compensation, as discussed in Note 3.

 

 

 

See accompanying notes.

 

4


Table of Contents

MICROSOFT CORPORATION

 

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

 

Note 1 – Accounting Policies

 

Basis of Presentation

 

In the opinion of management, the accompanying balance sheets and related interim statements of income, cash flows, and stockholders’ equity include all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring items, necessary for their fair presentation in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (U.S. GAAP). Preparing financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue, and expenses. Examples include estimates of loss contingencies and product life cycles, and assumptions such as the elements comprising a software arrangement, including the distinction between upgrades/enhancements and new products; when technological feasibility is achieved for the Company’s products; the potential outcome of future tax consequences of events that have been recognized in the Company’s financial statements or tax returns; and determining when investment impairments are other-than-temporary. Actual results and outcomes may differ from management’s estimates and assumptions.

 

Interim results are not necessarily indicative of results for a full year. The information included in this Form 10-Q should be read in conjunction with Management’s Discussion and Analysis and financial statements and notes thereto included in the Microsoft Corporation 2003 Form 10-K.

 

Certain reclassifications have been made to prior period amounts to conform with current period presentation.

 

Note 2 – Stock Split

 

In February 2003, outstanding shares of our common stock were split two-for-one. All prior share and per share amounts have been restated to reflect the stock split.

 

Note 3 – Accounting Changes

 

Effective July 1, 2003, we adopted the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, using the retroactive restatement method described in SFAS 148, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation—Transition and Disclosure. Under the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS 123, stock-based compensation cost is measured at the grant date based on the value of the award and is recognized as expense over the vesting period. The June 30, 2003 balance sheet has been restated for the retroactive adoption of the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS 123 which resulted in a $13.89 billion increase in common stock and paid-in capital, a $10.00 billion decrease in retained earnings, and a $3.89 billion increase in deferred income taxes.

 

Stock-based employee compensation expense was $1.06 billion ($709 million after-tax or $0.07 per diluted share) and $2.11 billion ($1.41 billion after-tax or $0.13 per diluted share) for the three and six months ended December 31, 2002, respectively, and $3.23 billion ($2.17 billion after-tax or $0.20 per diluted share) and $4.25 billion ($2.85 billion after-tax or $0.26 per diluted share) for the three and six months ended December 31, 2003, respectively. The amounts for the three and six months ended December 31, 2003 include $2.21 billion ($1.48 billion after-tax or $0.14 per diluted share) due to the completion of the employee stock option transfer program, which is described in the following footnote.

 

Note 4 – Stock-Based Compensation

 

In fiscal year 2004, we implemented changes in employee compensation designed to help us continue to attract and retain the best employees, and to better align employee interests with those of our shareholders.

 

5


Table of Contents

MICROSOFT CORPORATION

 

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

(Unaudited)

 

Employees are now granted stock awards instead of stock options. The stock award program offers employees the opportunity to earn shares of our stock over time, rather than options that give employees the right to purchase stock at a set price. We also completed an employee stock option transfer program in the second quarter of fiscal 2004 whereby employees could elect to transfer all of their vested and unvested stock options with a strike price of $33 or higher (“eligible options”) to JPMorgan Chase Bank (JPMorgan). The unvested eligible options that were transferred to JPMorgan became vested upon the transfer. The price paid by JPMorgan for the transferred options was determined by reference to the arithmetic average of the closing prices of Microsoft common stock during the period from November 14, 2003 to December 8, 2003, which was $25.5720.

 

A total of 18,503 (51%) of the 36,539 eligible Microsoft employees elected to participate in the stock option transfer program and 344.6 million (55%) of the 621.4 million eligible options were tendered. Under the terms of the program, JPMorgan paid Microsoft $382 million for the transferred options. Microsoft made an initial payment of $219 million to participating employees for the transferred options, with a remaining portion to be paid in one or more payments that are subject to participating employees’ continued employment over the next two or three years. The options that were transferred to JPMorgan resulted in stock-based compensation expense of $2.21 billion ($1.48 billion after-tax or $0.14 per diluted share). This expense consists of the unrecognized compensation costs of the options that were transferred, less the amounts payable applicable to those previously unvested options for which payment is contingent upon continued employment of participating employees. The contingent payments applicable to unvested eligible options that are subject to continued employment of participating employees will be recognized as compensation expense over the vesting period of the contingent payments.

 

The stock option transfer program also resulted in a decrease to our long term deferred tax assets due to the excess of recorded compensation expense for these options over the related tax deduction reported on our tax return. For the six months ended December 31, 2003, deferred tax assets were reduced by approximately $2.01 billion with an offsetting reduction in paid-in capital, reflecting the reduction of previously recorded deductions reported on our tax return in excess of stock based compensation expense. Following is a description of our stock plans.

 

We have stock plans for directors and for officers and employees. The plans provide for awards of stock options and stock awards. At December 31, 2003, an aggregate of 808 million shares were available for future grant under our stock plans. In addition, awards that expire or are cancelled without delivery of shares generally become available for issuance under the plans. The options transferred to JPMorgan have been removed from our plans; any options transferred to JPMorgan that expire without being exercised will not become available for grant under any of our plans.

 

Stock Awards

 

Stock Awards are grants that entitle the holder to shares of common stock as the award vests. A total of 29 million stock awards with a weighted-average fair value of $26.10 per share were granted during the first six months of fiscal 2004, generally vesting over a five year period.

 

Shared Performance Stock Awards

 

Shared Performance Stock Awards are a form of stock award in which the number of shares ultimately received depends on Microsoft’s performance against specified performance targets. Shared Performance Stock Awards for 30 million shares at target with a weighted-average fair value of $26.09 per share were made during the first six months of fiscal 2004 for the fiscal 2004-2006 performance period. At the end of the performance

 

6


Table of Contents

MICROSOFT CORPORATION

 

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

(Unaudited)

 

period, the number of shares of stock and stock awards issued will be determined by adjusting upward or downward from the target in a range between 33% and 150% (0% to 150% for certain executive officers). The final performance percentage on which the payout will be based, considering company performance metrics established for the performance period, will be determined by the board of directors or a committee of the board in its sole discretion. Shares of stock are issued at the end of the performance period and as the stock awards vest over the following two years.

 

Stock Options

 

Nonqualified stock options have been granted to our directors under the director stock plan. Nonqualified and incentive stock options have been granted to our officers and employees under the employee stock plan. Options granted before 1995 generally vest over four and one-half years and expire ten years from the date of grant. Options granted between 1995 and 2001 generally vest over four and one-half years and expire seven years from the date of grant, while certain options vest either over four and one-half years or over seven and one-half years and expire ten years from the date of grant. Options granted after 2001 vest over four and one-half years and expire ten years from the date of grant. At December 31, 2003, stock options for 580 million shares were vested.

 

Stock options outstanding under our stock-based compensation plans were as follows:

 

(In millions, except per share amounts)


               
           Price per Share

     Shares

    Range

   Weighted
Average


Balance, June 30, 2003

   1,549     0.40 – 59.56    29.30

Granted

   2     25.46 – 29.96    26.75

Exercised

   (91 )   0.51 – 29.38    9.01

Stock option transfer program

   (345 )   33.03 – 59.56    38.70

Canceled

   (36 )   2.31 – 58.28    33.27
    

        

Balance, December 31, 2003

   1,079     0.40 – 59.56    27.82
    

        

 

For various price ranges, weighted average characteristics of outstanding stock options under our stock-based compensation plans at December 31, 2003 were as follows:

 

(In millions, except per share amounts)


     Outstanding Options

   Exercisable Options

Range of Exercise Prices


   Shares

   Remaining
Life (Years)


   Weighted
Average Price


   Shares

  

Weighted

Average Price


$    0.40 – $15.00

   57    2.0    $ 6.97    51    $ 6.92

    15.01 –   25.00

   333    6.1      21.54    131      17.66

    25.01 –   33.00

   405    6.1      28.23    209      28.08

    33.01 –   41.00

   171    4.7      34.22    108      34.28

    41.01 –   59.56

   113    4.9      44.80    81      44.63

 

The information presented differs from the information presented in Microsoft’s 2003 10-K primarily due to the impact of the stock option transfer program as well as to correctly calculate the weighted average remaining life of outstanding options.

 

7


Table of Contents

MICROSOFT CORPORATION

 

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

(Unaudited)

 

Note 5 – Inventories

 

The components of inventories were as follows:

 

(In millions)


  

June 30

2003


  

Dec. 31

2003


Finished goods

   $ 393    $ 380

Raw materials and work in process

     247      241
    

  

Inventories

   $ 640    $ 621
    

  

 

Note 6 – Earnings Per Share

 

Basic earnings per share is computed on the basis of the weighted average number of common shares outstanding. Diluted earnings per share is computed on the basis of the weighted average number of common shares outstanding plus the effect of outstanding stock options, stock awards and shared performance stock awards using the “treasury stock” method.

 

The components of basic and diluted earnings per share were as follows:

 

Earnings Per Share

 

     Three Months Ended
Dec. 31


   Six Months Ended
Dec. 31


(In millions, except earnings per share)


   2002

   2003

   2002

   2003

Net income available for common shareholders (A)

   $ 1,865    $ 1,549    $ 3,906    $ 4,163

Weighted average outstanding shares of common stock (B)

     10,703      10,810      10,711      10,800

Dilutive effect of employee stock based compensation

     143      89      205      108
    

  

  

  

Common stock and common stock equivalents (C)

     10,846      10,899      10,916      10,908
    

  

  

  

Earnings per share:

                           

Basic (A/B)

   $ 0.17    $ 0.14    $ 0.36    $ 0.39
    

  

  

  

Diluted (A/C)

   $ 0.17    $ 0.14    $ 0.36    $ 0.38
    

  

  

  

 

For the three months ended December 31, 2002 and 2003, 1,056 million and 818 million shares attributable to outstanding stock options were excluded from the calculation of diluted earnings per share because the effect was antidilutive. For the six months ended December 31, 2002 and 2003, 1,096 million and 836 million shares attributable to outstanding stock options were excluded from the calculation of diluted earnings per share because the effect was antidilutive. For the six months ended December 31, 2003, 20 million shared performance stock awards, out of 30 million granted, have been excluded from the calculation of diluted earnings per share because the number of shares ultimately received will be determined by the board of directors or a committee of the board in its sole discretion, considering company performance against metrics established for the performance period, as discussed in Note 4.

 

Note 7 – Unearned Revenue

 

Unearned revenue from volume licensing programs represents customer billings, paid either upfront or annually at the beginning of each billing coverage period, which are accounted for as subscriptions with revenue recognized ratably over the billing coverage period. For certain licensing arrangements, revenue attributable to undelivered elements, including free post-delivery telephone support and the right to receive unspecified upgrades/enhancements of Microsoft Internet Explorer on a when-and-if-available basis, is based on the sales price of those elements when sold separately and is recognized ratably on a straight-line basis over the related product’s life cycle. The percentage of revenue recorded as unearned due to undelivered elements ranges from

 

8


Table of Contents

MICROSOFT CORPORATION

 

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

(Unaudited)

 

approximately 15% to 25% of the sales price for Windows XP Home, approximately 5% to 15% of the sales price for Windows XP Professional, and approximately 1% to 15% of the sales price for desktop applications, depending on the terms and conditions of the license and prices of the elements. Product life cycles are currently estimated at three and a half years for Windows operating systems and two years for desktop applications. Unearned revenue also includes payments for online advertising for which the advertisement has yet to be displayed and payments for post-delivery support services to be performed in the future.

 

The components of unearned revenue were as follows:

 

(In millions)


  

June 30

2003


  

Dec. 31

2003


Volume licensing programs

   $ 5,472    $ 4,579

Undelivered elements

     2,847      2,624

Other

     696      649
    

  

Unearned revenue

   $ 9,015    $ 7,852
    

  

 

Unearned revenue by segment was as follows:

 

(In millions)


  

June 30

2003


  

Dec. 31

2003


Client

   $ 3,165    $ 2,954

Server and Tools

     2,185      1,945

Information Worker

     3,305      2,635

Other segments

     360      318
    

  

Unearned revenue

   $ 9,015    $ 7,852
    

  

 

Of the $7.85 billion of unearned revenue at December 31, 2003, $2.56 billion is expected to be recognized in the third quarter of fiscal 2004, $1.94 billion in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2004, $1.08 billion in the first quarter of fiscal 2005, $647 million in the second quarter of fiscal 2005, and $1.62 billion thereafter.

 

The revenue earned from the Upgrade Advantage programs for the three months ended in fiscal years 2003 and 2004 was as follows (in millions):

 

September 30, 2002


 

December 31, 2002


 

March 31, 2003


 

June 30, 2003


 

September 30, 2003


 

December 31, 2003


$464

  $480   $450   $421   $379   $296

 

Note 8 – Stockholders’ Equity

 

As discussed in Note 4 – Stock-Based Compensation, 344.6 million options were transferred to JPMorgan under the stock option transfer program. The options transferred to JPMorgan were amended and restated upon transfer to contain terms and conditions typical of equity option transactions entered into between sophisticated financial counterparties at arm’s-length using standard terms and definitions for equity derivatives. The options have strike prices ranging from $33.03 to $59.56 per share and expire between February 2004 and December 2006.

 

We repurchase our common shares primarily to manage the dilutive effects of our stock-based compensation plans and other issuances of common shares. During the December quarter, we repurchased 30.5 million shares of common stock for $830 million, compared to 38.8 million shares for $999 million in the

 

9


Table of Contents

MICROSOFT CORPORATION

 

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

(Unaudited)

 

comparable quarter of the prior year. For the first six months of fiscal 2004, we repurchased 73.8 million shares of common stock for $2.0 billion, compared to 159.4 million shares of common stock for $4.0 billion in the comparable period of the prior year. In any period, cash used in financing activities related to common stock repurchased may differ from the comparable change in Stockholders’ Equity, reflecting timing differences between the recognition of share repurchase transactions and their settlement for cash.

 

Note 9 – Investment Income

 

The components of investment income are as follows:

 

    

Three Months

Ended

Dec. 31


  

Six Months

Ended

Dec. 31


(In millions)


   2002

    2003

   2002

    2003

Dividends and interest

   $ 515     $ 521    $ 1,031     $ 1,005

Net gains (losses) on investments

     (104 )     310      (232 )     555

Net gains (losses) on derivatives

     (36 )     11      (383 )     45
    


 

  


 

Investment income

   $ 375     $ 842    $ 416     $ 1,605
    


 

  


 

 

Net gains (losses) on investments includes other-than-temporary impairments of $43 million in the second quarter of fiscal 2004 compared to $421 million in the second quarter of the prior year, and $61 million for the six month period ended December 31 compared to $855 million in the six month period ended December 31, 2002.

 

Note 10 – Contingencies

 

We are a defendant in U.S. v. Microsoft and New York v. Microsoft, companion lawsuits filed by the Antitrust Division of the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) and a group of eighteen state Attorneys General alleging violations of the Sherman Act and various state antitrust laws. After the trial, the District Court entered Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law stating that we had violated Sections 1 and 2 of the Sherman Act and various state antitrust laws. A Judgment was entered on June 7, 2000 ordering, among other things, our breakup into two companies. On June 28, 2001, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit affirmed in part, reversed in part, and vacated the Judgment in its entirety and remanded the case to the District Court for a new trial on one Section 1 claim and for entry of a new judgment consistent with its ruling. In its ruling, the Court of Appeals substantially narrowed the bases of liability found by the District Court, but affirmed some of the District Court’s conclusions that we had violated Section 2. We entered into a settlement with the United States on November 2, 2001. Nine states (New York, Ohio, Illinois, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maryland, Michigan, North Carolina and Wisconsin) agreed to settle on substantially the same terms on November 6, 2001. On November 1, 2002, the Court approved the settlement as being in the public interest, conditioned upon the parties’ agreement to a modification to one provision related to the Court’s ongoing jurisdiction. Two trade groups unsuccessfully sought to intervene to challenge the approval of the settlement and have appealed. Nine states and the District of Columbia continued to litigate the remedies phase of New York v. Microsoft. On November 1, 2002, the Court entered a Final Judgment in this part of the litigation that largely mirrored the settlement between us, the DOJ and the settling states, with some modifications and a different regime for enforcing compliance. The Court declined to impose other and broader remedies sought by the non-settling states. Two states, Massachusetts and West Virginia, appealed from this decision. West Virginia dismissed its appeal as part of a settlement with us of several other cases. Oral argument on both appeals was heard by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit on November 4, 2003.

 

10


Table of Contents

MICROSOFT CORPORATION

 

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

(Unaudited)

 

The European Commission has instituted proceedings in which it alleges that we have failed to disclose information that our competitors claim they need to interoperate fully with Windows 2000 clients and servers and that we have engaged in discriminatory licensing of such technology and improper bundling of multimedia playback technology in the Windows operating system. The remedies sought, though not fully defined, include mandatory disclosure of our Windows operating system technology, either the removal of Windows Media technology from Windows or a “must carry” obligation requiring OEMs to install competitive media players with Windows, and imposition of fines in an amount that could be as large as 10% of our worldwide annual revenue. We deny the European Commission’s allegations and intend to contest the proceedings vigorously. An oral hearing was held on November 12-14, 2003. In other ongoing investigations, various foreign governments and several state Attorneys General have requested information from us concerning competition, privacy, and security issues.

 

A large number of antitrust and unfair competition class action lawsuits have been filed against us in various state and federal courts. The federal cases have been consolidated in the U.S. District Court for Maryland with the exception of one case which is currently pending in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas. These cases allege that we have competed unfairly and unlawfully monopolized alleged markets for operating systems and certain software applications, and they seek to recover on behalf of variously defined classes of direct and indirect purchasers overcharges we allegedly charged for these products. To date, courts have dismissed all claims for damages against us by indirect purchasers under federal law and in 16 states. Eight of those state court decisions have been affirmed on appeal. Claims on behalf of foreign purchasers have also been dismissed. Appeals of several of these rulings are still pending. No trials have been held concerning any liability issues. Courts in eleven states have ruled that these cases may proceed as class actions, while courts in two states have denied class certification status, and another court has ruled that no class action is available for antitrust claims in that state. The Maryland District Court has certified a class of direct purchasers of our operating system software that acquired the software from the shop.Microsoft.com web site or pursuant to a direct marketing campaign and otherwise denied certification of the proposed classes. Members of the certified class licensed fewer than 550,000 copies of at-issue operating system software from Microsoft. In September 2003, we reached an agreement with plaintiffs’ counsel to settle this action. The settlement has been preliminarily approved by the court but still requires final approval. In 2003, we reached an agreement with counsel for the California plaintiffs to settle all claims in 27 consolidated cases in that state. Under the proposed settlement, class members will be able to obtain vouchers on a claims made basis that entitle the class members to be reimbursed up to the face value of their vouchers for purchases of a wide variety of platform-neutral computer hardware and software. The total amount of vouchers issued will depend on the number of class members who claim and are issued vouchers. Two-thirds of the amount of vouchers unissued or unredeemed by class members will be made available to certain schools in California in the form of vouchers that also may be redeemed for cash against purchases of a wide variety of platform-neutral computer hardware, software and related services. The court in California preliminarily approved this proposed settlement, but it still requires final approval by the court. In 2003, we also reached similar agreements to settle all claims in Montana, Florida, West Virginia, North Carolina, the District of Columbia, North Dakota, Kansas, Tennessee and South Dakota. The proposed settlements in these states are structured similarly to the California settlement, except that, among other differences, one-half of the amounts of vouchers unissued to class members will be made available to certain schools in the relevant states. The maximum amount of vouchers to be issued in these settlements, including the California settlement, is $1.55 billion. The actual costs of these settlements will be less than that maximum amount, depending on the number of class members and schools who are issued and redeem vouchers. The settlements in Florida and Montana have received final approval by the relevant court. The proposed settlements in West Virginia, the District of Columbia, North Carolina, Tennessee, South Dakota and Kansas have received preliminary approval by the courts in those states, but still require final approval. We intend to continue

 

11


Table of Contents

MICROSOFT CORPORATION

 

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

(Unaudited)

 

vigorously defending the remaining lawsuits, with trial scheduled to begin in Minnesota on March 1, 2004. We estimate the total cost to resolve all of these cases will range between $935 million and $1.1 billion with the actual cost dependent upon many unknown factors such as the quantity and mix of products for which claims will be made, the number of eligible class members who ultimately use the vouchers, the nature of hardware and software that is acquired using the vouchers, and the cost of administering the claims process. In accordance with SFAS 5, Accounting for Contingencies, and FIN 14, Reasonable Estimation of the Amount of a Loss, we have recorded a contingent liability of $919 million, net of administrative expenses paid.

 

On March 8, 2002, Sun Microsystems, Inc. filed suit against us alleging violations of federal and state antitrust and unfair competition laws as well as claims under the Federal Copyright Act. Sun seeks injunctive relief and unspecified treble damages along with its fees and costs. We deny these allegations and will vigorously defend this action. The case has been transferred for pretrial purposes to the U.S. District Court in Baltimore, Maryland and is being coordinated with the antitrust and unfair competition class actions described above. On January 21, 2003, the Court granted Sun’s motion for a preliminary injunction and entered an injunction requiring us to distribute certain Sun Java software with Microsoft Windows XP and certain other products. The injunction also prohibits us from distributing our version of Java software in a variety of ways. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit granted our request for a stay of the preliminary injunction order. On June 26, 2003, a three judge panel of the Fourth Circuit issued a unanimous opinion vacating the preliminary injunction requiring us to distribute Sun Java software and upheld the preliminary injunction prohibiting us from distributing our version of Java software in certain ways.

 

On December 18, 2003, RealNetworks, Inc. filed suit against us alleging violations of federal and state antitrust and unfair competition laws, related to streaming media features of Windows and related technologies. RealNetworks seeks damages and injunctive relief, including a permanent injunction requiring Microsoft to offer a version of Windows products with no streaming media features. We deny the allegations and will vigorously defend the action. RealNetworks filed the case in federal court in San Jose, California but is seeking transfer for pretrial purposes to the U.S. District Court in Baltimore. We have filed a motion to transfer the case from San Jose to Seattle for trial.

 

We are the defendant in more than 30 patent infringement cases. In the case of Eolas Technologies, Inc. and University of California v. Microsoft, filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois on February 2, 1999, the plaintiffs accused the browser functionality of Windows of infringement. On August 11, 2003, the jury awarded the plaintiffs approximately $520 million in damages for infringement from the date the plaintiffs’ patent issued through September 2001. The plaintiffs are seeking an equitable accounting for damages from September 2001 to the present. On January 14, 2004, the trial court entered final judgment of $565 million, including post-trial interest of $45 million, and entered an injunction against distribution of any new products, but stayed execution of the judgment and the injunction pending our appeal which we intend to pursue in due course. On October 30, 2003, the U.S. Patent Office issued a letter stating that it has initiated a Director-ordered re-examination of the Eolas patent. We believe the total cost to resolve this case will not be material to our financial position or results of operations. The actual costs are dependent upon many unknown factors such as success on appeal and the events of a retrial of the case should the case be remanded to trial following appeal. The trial of InterTrust v. Microsoft, filed in the U.S. District Court for Northern California on April 26, 2001, is anticipated in 2005. The plaintiff in this case has accused a large number of products, including Windows and Office, of infringement. In InterTrust, injunctive relief also may be awarded that could adversely impact distribution of Windows or Office. In TVI v. Microsoft, filed in U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, plaintiff accuses the Autoplay feature of Windows of infringement. This case is scheduled for trial in July of 2004. Adverse outcomes in some or all of the pending cases may result in significant monetary damages or injunctive relief against us.

 

12


Table of Contents

MICROSOFT CORPORATION

 

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

(Unaudited)

 

We are also subject to a variety of other claims and suits that arise from time to time in the ordinary course of our business.

 

While management currently believes that resolving all of these matters, individually or in aggregate, will not have a material adverse impact on our financial position or our results of operations, the litigation and other claims noted above are subject to inherent uncertainties and management’s view of these matters may change in the future. Were an unfavorable final outcome to occur, there exists the possibility of a material adverse impact on our financial position and the results of operations for the period in which the effect becomes reasonably estimable.

 

Note 11 – Guarantees

 

We have unconditionally guaranteed the repayment of certain Japanese Yen denominated bank loans and related interest and fees of Jupiter Telecommunication, Ltd., a Japanese cable company (Jupiter). These guarantees arose on February 1, 2003 in conjunction with the expiration of prior financing arrangements, including previous guarantees by us. The financing arrangements were entered into by Jupiter as part of financing its operations. As part of Jupiter’s new financing agreement, we agreed to guarantee repayment by Jupiter of the loans of approximately $55 million. The estimated fair value and the carrying value of the guarantees was $10.5 million and did not result in a charge to operations. The guarantees are in effect until the earlier of repayment of the loans, including accrued interest and fees, or February 1, 2009. The maximum amount of the guarantees is limited to the sum of the total due and unpaid principal amounts, accrued and unpaid interest, and any other related expenses. Additionally, the maximum amount of the guarantees, denominated in Japanese yen, will vary based on fluctuations in foreign exchange rates. If we were required to make payments under the guarantees, we may recover all or a portion of those payments upon liquidation of Jupiter’s assets. The proceeds from such liquidation cannot be accurately estimated due to the multitude of factors that would affect the valuation and realization of the proceeds in the event of liquidation.

 

In connection with various operating leases, we issued residual value guarantees, which provide that if we do not purchase the leased property from the lessor at the end of the lease term, then we are liable to the lessor for an amount equal to the shortage (if any) between the proceeds from the sale of the property and an agreed value. As of December 31, 2003, the maximum amount of the residual value guarantees was approximately $271 million. We believe that proceeds from the sale of properties under operating leases would exceed the payment obligation and therefore no liability to us currently exists.

 

We provide indemnifications of varying scope and size to certain customers against claims of intellectual property infringement made by third parties arising from the use of our products. We evaluate estimated losses for such indemnifications under SFAS 5 as interpreted by FASB Interpretation 45, Guarantor’s Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others (FIN 45). We consider such factors as the degree of probability of an unfavorable outcome and the ability to make a reasonable estimate of the amount of loss. To date, we have not encountered material costs as a result of such obligations and have not accrued any liabilities related to such indemnifications in our financial statements.

 

Our product warranty accrual reflects management’s best estimate of probable liability under our product warranties (primarily relating to the Xbox console). We determine the warranty accrual based on known product failures (if any), historical experience, and other currently available evidence. Product warranty and changes to the accruals were not significant for any of the periods presented.

 

13


Table of Contents

MICROSOFT CORPORATION

 

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

(Unaudited)

 

Note 12 – Segment Information

 

(In millions)


            

Three Months Ended Dec. 31


   2002

    2003

 

Revenue

                

Client

   $ 2,421     $ 3,016  

Server and Tools

     1,672       1,949  

Information Worker

     2,382       2,856  

Microsoft Business Solutions

     151       177  

MSN

     578       596  

Mobile and Embedded Devices

     37       58  

Home and Entertainment

     1,283       1,201  

Reconciling Amounts

     17       300  
    


 


Consolidated

   $ 8,541     $ 10,153  
    


 


Operating Income/(Loss)

                

Client

   $ 1,948     $ 2,438  

Server and Tools

     465       544  

Information Worker

     1,924       2,130  

Microsoft Business Solutions

     (66 )     (42 )

MSN

     (153 )     112  

Mobile and Embedded Devices

     (38 )     (34 )

Home and Entertainment

     (341 )     (241 )

Reconciling Amounts

     (1,506 )     (3,432 )
    


 


Consolidated

   $ 2,233     $ 1,475  
    


 


(In millions)


            

Six Months Ended Dec. 31


   2002

    2003

 

Revenue

                

Client

   $ 5,302     $ 5,674  

Server and Tools

     3,258       3,727  

Information Worker

     4,729       5,270  

Microsoft Business Solutions

     272       314  

MSN

     1,114       1,200  

Mobile and Embedded Devices

     65       109  

Home and Entertainment

     1,788       1,833  

Reconciling Amounts

     (241 )     241  
    


 


Consolidated

   $ 16,287     $ 18,368  
    


 


Operating Income/(Loss)

                

Client

   $ 4,426     $ 4,640  

Server and Tools

     1,011       1,052  

Information Worker

     3,814       3,950  

Microsoft Business Solutions

     (105 )     (95 )

MSN

     (246 )     209  

Mobile and Embedded Devices

     (68 )     (48 )

Home and Entertainment

     (512 )     (417 )

Reconciling Amounts

     (3,059 )     (4,668 )
    


 


Consolidated

   $ 5,261     $ 4,623  
    


 


 

14


Table of Contents

MICROSOFT CORPORATION

 

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

(Unaudited)

 

Segment information is presented in accordance with SFAS 131, Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information. This standard is based on a management approach, which requires segmentation based upon our internal organization and reporting of revenue and operating income based upon internal accounting methods. Our financial reporting systems present various data for management to run the business, including internal profit and loss statements (P&Ls) prepared on a basis not consistent with U.S. GAAP. Assets are not allocated to segments for internal reporting presentations. A portion of amortization and depreciation is included with various other costs in an overhead allocation to each segment and it is impracticable for the Company to separately identify the amount of amortization and depreciation by segment that is included in the measure of segment profit or loss.

 

Our segments are designed to promote better alignment of strategies and objectives between development, sales, marketing, and services organizations; provide for more timely and rational allocation of development, sales, and marketing resources within businesses; and focus long-term planning efforts on key objectives and initiatives. Our seven segments are: Client; Server and Tools; Information Worker; Microsoft Business Solutions; MSN; Mobile and Embedded Devices; and Home and Entertainment.

 

The segments are used to allocate resources internally and provide a framework to determine management responsibility. Due to our integrated business structure, operating costs included in one segment may benefit other segments, and therefore the segments are not designed to measure operating income or loss directly related to the products included in each segment. Inter-segment sales cost commissions are estimated by management and used to compensate or charge each segment for such shared costs, and to incent shared efforts. Management will continually evaluate the alignment of development, sales organizations, and inter-segment commissions for segment reporting purposes, which may result in changes to segment allocations in future periods.

 

The Company retroactively adopted the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS 123 on July 1, 2003. For internal management reporting, the equity compensation expense for stock awards, shared performance-based stock awards, and the employee stock purchase plan have been allocated to the segments, using a non-GAAP accelerated amortization method in the case of stock awards and shared performance-based stock awards. For example, the compensation expense for stock award grants will be expensed in the fiscal year of grant and the compensation expense for performance-based stock award grants will be expensed over three years. Costs related to options granted in prior years, including the costs associated with the stock option transfer program discussed in Note 4, were not allocated to segments by management and therefore are not included in segment operating income and are included as reconciling items. Additionally, as the broad use of stock awards and performance-based awards began in the current year, there is no comparable expense included in the corresponding period of the prior year. The following table outlines the equity compensation expense included in segment operating income for the three and the six months period ended December 31, 2003.

 

(In millions)


         

Three Months Ended Dec. 31


   2002

   2003

Client

          $ 36

Server and Tools

            94

Information Worker

            44

Microsoft Business Solutions

            9

MSN

            21

Mobile and Embedded Devices

            8

Home and Entertainment

            18

Reconciling Amounts

     1,058      3,002
    

  

Consolidated

   $ 1,058    $ 3,232
    

  

 

15


Table of Contents

MICROSOFT CORPORATION

 

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

(Unaudited)

 

(In millions)


         

Six Months Ended Dec. 31


   2002

   2003

Client

          $ 70

Server and Tools

            181

Information Worker

            85

Microsoft Business Solutions

            18

MSN

            40

Mobile and Embedded Devices

            16

Home and Entertainment

            36

Reconciling Amounts

     2,106      3,800
    

  

Consolidated

   $ 2,106    $ 4,246
    

  

 

Client includes revenue and operating expenses associated with Windows XP Professional and Home, Windows 2000 Professional, and other standard Windows operating systems. Server and Tools consists of revenue and operating expenses associated with server software licenses and client access licenses (CALs) for Windows Server, SQL Server, Exchange Server, and other servers. It also includes developer tools, training, certification, Microsoft Press, Premier product support services, and Microsoft consulting services. Information Worker includes Microsoft Office, Microsoft Project, Microsoft Visio, SharePoint Portal Server CALs, other information worker products including LiveMeeting and OneNote, an allocation for CALs, and professional product support services. Microsoft Business Solutions includes Microsoft Great Plains, Microsoft Navision, Microsoft Axapta, Microsoft Solomon, Microsoft CRM, bCentral and other business applications and services. MSN includes MSN subscriptions and the MSN network of Internet products and services. Mobile and Embedded Devices includes Windows Mobile software, Windows Embedded device operating systems, MapPoint, and Windows Automotive. Home and Entertainment includes the Xbox video game system, PC games, consumer software and hardware, and TV platform.

 

Corporate and reconciling amounts include adjustments to state revenue and operating income in accordance with U.S. GAAP and corporate level expenses not specifically attributed to a segment. For revenue, reconciling items include certain undelivered elements of unearned revenue and allowances for certain sales returns and rebates. Corporate and reconciling items for operating income/(loss) for the second quarter include general and administrative expenses ($497 million in the second quarter of fiscal year 2003 and $896 million in 2004), broad-based research and development expenses ($59 million in the second quarter of fiscal year 2003 and $85 million in 2004), and certain corporate level sales and marketing costs ($159 million in the second quarter of fiscal year 2003 and $208 million in 2004), $2.21 billion in stock based compensation related to the employee stock option transfer program, and other reconciling items, including additional stock based compensation expense ($791 million in the second quarter of fiscal year 2003 and $35 million in 2004). Corporate and reconciling items for operating income/(loss) for the first six months include general and administrative expenses ($749 million in the first six months of fiscal 2003 and $1.37 billion in 2004), broad-based research and development expenses ($109 million in the first six months of fiscal 2003 and $163 million in 2004), and certain corporate level sales and marketing costs ($285 million in the first six months of fiscal 2003 and $408 million in 2004), $2.21 billion in stock based compensation related to the employee stock option transfer program, and other reconciling items, including additional stock based compensation expense ($1.91 billion in the first six months of fiscal 2003 and $509 million in 2004). The internal segment operating income or loss also includes non-GAAP accelerated methods of depreciation and amortization, and accelerated amortization of stock awards and performance-based stock awards. Additionally, losses on equity investees and minority interest are classified in operating income for internal reporting presentations.

 

16


Table of Contents

INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS’ REPORT

 

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of Microsoft Corporation

Redmond, Washington

 

We have reviewed the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of Microsoft Corporation and subsidiaries (the Company) as of December 31, 2003, and the related consolidated statements of income, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for the three-month and six-month periods ended December 31, 2003 and 2002. These interim financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management.

 

We conducted our reviews in accordance with standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. A review of interim financial information consists principally of applying analytical procedures and making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and accounting matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America, the objective of which is the expression of an opinion regarding the financial statements taken as a whole. Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.

 

Based on our reviews, we are not aware of any material modifications that should be made to such consolidated interim financial statements for them to be in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

 

We have previously audited, in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America, the consolidated balance sheet of Microsoft Corporation and subsidiaries as of June 30, 2003, and the related consolidated statements of income, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for the year then ended prior to restatement for the adoption of SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation (not presented herein); and in our report dated July 17, 2003 (September 3, 2003 as to certain information in Note 20), we expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements. We also audited the adjustments described in Note 3 that were applied to restate the June 30, 2003 consolidated balance sheet of Microsoft Corporation and subsidiaries (not presented herein). In our opinion, such adjustments are appropriate and have been properly applied and the information set forth in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet as of June 30, 2003 is fairly stated, in all material respects, in relation to the consolidated balance sheet from which it has been derived.

 

/s/    DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP        


Seattle, Washington
January 30, 2004

 

17


Table of Contents

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

 

Management’s Discussion and Analysis (MD&A) contains statements that are forward-looking. These statements are based on current expectations and assumptions that are subject to risks and uncertainties. Actual results could differ materially because of factors discussed in “Issues and Uncertainties” and elsewhere in this report. We undertake no duty to update any forward-looking statement to conform the statement to actual results or changes in our expectations.

 

Management Summary

 

Revenue for the second quarter of fiscal year 2004 was $10.15 billion, an increase of 19% over the second quarter of fiscal year 2003. The revenue growth was driven primarily by licensing of the recently launched Office 2003, increased licensing of Windows operating systems through OEMs and Server and Tools products, and 19% growth in MSN revenue.

 

During the second quarter, the continued strong PC shipment growth influenced our overall revenue growth. We estimate that total PC shipments grew 12% from the second quarter of the prior year reflecting strength in the consumer segment and notebook sales. We also observed an improvement in overall IT spending. We estimate that total server hardware shipments grew 13%, with Windows Server shipments growing faster than the overall sector at 19% in the second quarter of fiscal 2004. The net impact of foreign exchange rates on revenue was positive in the second quarter compared to a year ago, primarily due to a stronger Euro and Japanese yen versus the U.S. dollar. Had the rates from the prior year’s second quarter been in effect in the second quarter of fiscal 2004, translated international revenue earned in local currencies would have been approximately $312 million lower. Certain manufacturing, selling, distribution, and support costs are disbursed in local currencies, and a portion of international revenue is hedged, thus offsetting a portion of the translation exposure.

 

Revenue for the first six months of fiscal year 2004 was $18.37 billion, an increase of 13% over the first six months of fiscal year 2003. The revenue growth was driven by 13% growth in estimated PC shipments, reflecting strength primarily in the consumer segment and notebook sales. We estimate that total server hardware shipments grew 12%, with Windows Server shipments growing faster than the overall sector at 16% in the first six months of fiscal 2004. The revenue growth was also driven by revenue recognized from multi-year licensing that occurred prior to the Company’s transition to its new licensing program (Licensing 6.0) in the first quarter of fiscal 2003. Prior to the July 31, 2002 transition date to Licensing 6.0, the Company experienced a significant growth in multi-year licensing arrangements as customers enrolled in the Company’s maintenance programs, primarily Upgrade Advantage programs and Enterprise Agreements.

 

Unearned revenue as of December 31, 2003 decreased $1.16 billion from June 30, 2003. The decrease reflected a $223 million decrease in unearned revenue related to undelivered elements as deferral rates were lowered and product life cycles lengthened for the underlying products licensed in the first half of fiscal 2004 compared to fiscal 2003, resulting in a higher proportion of revenue earned. The decline also reflects a net decrease of $893 million in unearned revenue from volume licensing programs as $675 million of revenue was earned from previously deferred revenue from Upgrade Advantage programs.

 

The net impact of foreign exchange rates on revenue was positive in the first six months of fiscal 2004, primarily due to a stronger Euro and Japanese yen versus the U.S. dollar. Had the rates from the prior year’s first six months been in effect in the first six months of fiscal 2004, translated international revenue earned in local currencies would have been approximately $477 million lower. Certain manufacturing, selling, distribution, and support costs are disbursed in local currencies, and a portion of international revenue is hedged, thus offsetting a portion of the translation exposure.

 

For the full fiscal 2004, PC shipments are expected to grow at double digit rates. In the second half of the fiscal year, we expect PC market growth to be driven by both consumer and business demand for PCs. We believe the overall server hardware sector and IT spending outlook is improving. Our enterprise server products

 

18


Table of Contents

revenue results should be positively influenced by the continued shift to lower cost X86 server architecture. As a result, we expect overall server hardware shipment growth for fiscal 2004 to reach double digit growth with Windows Server operating systems licenses growing faster than the overall sector. We believe foreign exchange rates will stabilize during the second half of our fiscal year and we will continue to benefit from the U.S. dollar’s position relative to the Euro and Japanese yen in the second half of the fiscal year.

 

Consolidated operating income of $1.48 billion declined 34% for the second quarter of fiscal year 2004 due primarily to $2.21 billion in stock based compensation expenses related to our employee stock option transfer program completed in the second quarter of fiscal 2004. Increased marketing, legal costs, and employee-related costs associated with additional headcount also contributed to the increase in operating expenses.

 

Consolidated operating income of $4.62 billion declined 12% for the first six months of fiscal year 2004 due primarily to $2.21 billion in stock based compensation expenses related to our employee stock option transfer program completed in the second quarter of fiscal 2004. Increased legal costs and employee-related costs associated with additional headcount also contributed to the increase in operating expenses.

 

We adopted the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, on July 1, 2003 and restated prior periods to reflect compensation cost under the recognition provisions of SFAS 123 for all awards granted to employees after July 1, 1995. Headcount-related costs in operating expenses include stock-based compensation. Total stock-based compensation costs included in operating expenses for the second quarter of fiscal 2004 were $3.23 billion, compared to $1.06 billion in the prior year’s comparable quarter and $4.25 billion for the first six months of fiscal 2004, compared to $2.11 billion for the first six months of fiscal 2003.

 

SEGMENT PRODUCT REVENUE/OPERATING INCOME (LOSS)

 

Our seven segments are:

 

  Client

 

  Server and Tools

 

  Information Worker

 

  Microsoft Business Solutions

 

  MSN

 

  Mobile and Embedded Devices

 

  Home and Entertainment

 

The revenue and operating income/(loss) amounts in this MD&A are presented in accordance with U.S. GAAP. Segment Information appearing in Note 12 of the Notes to Financial Statements are presented in accordance with SFAS 131, Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information.

 

The following table presents our segment revenue and operating income, determined in accordance with U.S. GAAP:

 

(In millions)    Revenue

  

Operating

Income/(Loss)


 

Three Months Ended Dec. 31


   2002

   2003

   2002

    2003

 

Client

   $ 2,534    $ 3,059    $ 1,952     $ 2,072  

Server and Tools

     1,763      2,134      234       (204 )

Information Worker

     2,285      2,895      1,663       1,674  

Microsoft Business Solutions

     135      190      (87 )     (69 )

MSN

     459      546      (197 )     (79 )

Mobile and Embedded Devices

     38      63      (75 )     (112 )

Home and Entertainment

     1,327      1,266      (412 )     (394 )

Corporate and Other

     —        —        (845 )     (1,413 )

Consolidated

   $ 8,541    $ 10,153    $ 2,233     $ 1,475  

 

19


Table of Contents
(In millions)    Revenue

  

Operating

Income/(Loss)


 

Six Months Ended Dec. 31


   2002

   2003

   2002

    2003

 

Client

   $ 5,341    $ 5,868    $ 4,235     $ 4,336  

Server and Tools

     3,388      4,000      526       166  

Information Worker

     4,553      5,182      3,322       3,265  

Microsoft Business Solutions

     241      318      (181 )     (148 )

MSN

     886      1,037      (344 )     (21 )

Mobile and Embedded Devices

     66      116      (140 )     (144 )

Home and Entertainment

     1,812      1,847      (656 )     (667 )

Corporate and Other

     0      0      (1,501 )     (2,164 )

Consolidated

   $ 16,287    $ 18,368    $ 5,261     $ 4,623  

 

Client

 

Client revenue was $3.06 billion in the second quarter, growing 21% from the second quarter of the prior year. Client includes revenue from Windows XP Professional and Home, Windows 2000 Professional, and other standard Windows operating systems. Windows OEM license units grew 27%, driving a 26% growth in OEM revenue compared to the prior year. The mix of Windows units shipped with the Professional version remained steady at 55% of total Windows licenses compared to the prior year. In the first quarter of fiscal 2003, we completed our transition to new licensing terms under which OEMs are billed for products when Certificates of Authenticity (COAs) are acquired rather than upon PC shipment, which resulted in reported licenses in the second quarter of the prior year to be unusually low as some OEMs accumulated inventory at the end of the first quarter of fiscal 2003. Revenue from commercial and retail licensing grew 4% compared to the prior year’s second quarter. Client operating income for the second quarter of fiscal year 2004 grew 6% compared to the second quarter of the prior year as a result of 21% growth in revenue partially offset by 70% growth in operating expenses, primarily from $307 million of stock based compensation expense related to the employee stock option transfer program, other headcount-related costs, and a $60 million settlement charge in the second quarter of fiscal 2004.

 

Client revenue was $5.87 billion in the first six months of fiscal 2004, representing 10% growth from the first six months of the prior year. The six month revenue growth reflected Windows OEM license units growth of 13%, driving a 14% growth in OEM revenue compared to the prior year. The mix of Windows units shipped with the Professional version decreased to 58% from 59% of total Windows licenses in the first six months of the prior year as OEM shipments of consumer PCs grew at a faster rate than business PCs in the first six months of fiscal 2004. Revenue from commercial and retail licensing declined 5% compared to the prior year’s first six months. Client operating income for the first six months of fiscal year 2004 grew 2% compared to the first six months of the prior year due to 10% growth in revenue partially offset by 39% growth in operating expenses, primarily related to the stock based compensation expense from the employee stock option transfer program, headcount-related costs, and a settlement charge in the second quarter of fiscal 2004.

 

We anticipate that total PC shipments will grow at double digit rates for the rest of fiscal 2004, continuing to influence our growth in Client revenue. We do not expect a significant incremental shift toward our higher priced Windows Professional version.

 

Server and Tools

 

Server and Tools revenue grew 21% to $2.13 billion in the second quarter. Server and Tools consists of server software licenses and client access licenses (CALs) for Windows Server, SQL Server, Exchange Server, and other servers. It also includes developer tools, training, certification, Microsoft Press, Premier product support services, and Microsoft consulting services. Server revenue, including CALs, grew $290 million or 22% driven primarily by an estimated 19% increase in Windows-based server shipments driving 17% growth in new Windows Server license sales as well as growth in SQL Server and Exchange Server revenue. Consulting and Premier product support services increased $70 million or 29% compared to the prior year’s second quarter.

 

20


Table of Contents

Revenue from developer tools, training, certification, Microsoft Press and other services grew $11 million or 5%. Server and Tools reported an operating loss of $204 million in the second quarter of 2004, compared to operating income of $234 million in the second quarter of the prior year. While revenue increased 21%, Server and Tools reported an operating loss because of stock based compensation costs of $651 million related to the employee stock option transfer program, and a 10% increase in operating expenses including headcount related costs.

 

Server and Tools revenue grew 18% to $4.00 billion in the first six months of fiscal 2004. Server revenue, including CALs, grew $504 million or 20% driven primarily by an estimated 16% increase in Windows-based server shipments driving growth in new Windows Server license sales as well as growth in SQL Server and Exchange Server revenue. Consulting and Premier product support services increased $107 million or 23% compared to the prior year’s first six months. Revenue from developer tools, training, certification, Microsoft Press and other services was consistent with the prior year’s first six months. Server and Tools operating income for the first six months of fiscal 2004 decreased to $166 million compared to $526 million in the prior year primarily due to the stock based compensation costs from the employee stock option transfer program in the second quarter of fiscal 2004 and an 11% increase in operating expenses including headcount related costs.

 

Information Worker

 

Revenue from Information Worker was $2.90 billion in the second quarter of fiscal 2004, increasing 27% from the prior year’s second quarter. Information Worker includes revenue from Microsoft Office, Microsoft Project, Microsoft Visio, SharePoint Portal Server CALs, other information worker products including Microsoft LiveMeeting and OneNote, and professional product support services. Revenue for the quarter included $137 million of revenue deferred from the first quarter of fiscal 2004 for purchases of Office XP made in the first quarter that included rights to upgrade to Office 2003 when Office 2003 was released in the second quarter. Revenue from retail packaged product sales grew 36% from the second quarter of fiscal 2003 in part due to the release of the new Office 2003 during the second quarter. OEM licensing revenue from Office products and pre-installed versions of Office in Japan grew 22% from the second quarter of fiscal 2003. Contributing to the increase in revenue was a lower deferral rate for undelivered elements in the quarter ended December 31, 2003 as compared to the prior year’s comparable quarter, which resulted in a higher proportion of revenue earned. Information Worker operating income for the second quarter of fiscal year 2004 increased 1% due to the 27% growth in revenue from the prior year, which were mostly offset by an increase in operating expenses, primarily related to $351 million in stock-based compensation expense from the employee stock option transfer program, headcount related costs, and increased costs associated with Office 2003 launch.

 

Revenue from Information Worker was $5.18 billion in the first six months of fiscal 2003, increasing 14% from the prior year’s first six months. Revenue growth was driven by recognition of unearned revenue from a large increase in multi-year licenses signed prior to the transition to the Company’s Licensing 6.0 programs and 26% growth in retailed packaged product sales in part due to the release of the new Office 2003. OEM and pre-installed versions of Office in Japan grew 30% in the first six months of fiscal 2004. Information Worker operating income for the first six months of fiscal year 2004 declined 2% due to an increase in operating expenses, primarily related to the stock based compensation expense from the employee stock option transfer program and higher sales and marketing expenses, partially offset by the 14% growth in revenue from the prior year.

 

Microsoft Business Solutions

 

Microsoft Business Solutions revenue for the second quarter was $190 million, a 41% increase compared to $135 million in the prior year’s second quarter. Microsoft Business Solutions includes Microsoft Great Plains, Microsoft Navision, Microsoft Axapta, Microsoft Solomon, Microsoft CRM, bCentral and other business applications and services. The revenue increase of $55 million was primarily attributable to continued growth in licensing of Navision products and Business Contact Manager as well as the timing of licensing agreements. Microsoft Business Solutions operating loss for the second quarter of fiscal year 2004 declined 21% led by the 41% increase in revenue, partially offset by a 17% increase in operating expenses primarily related to stock based compensation expense from the employee stock option transfer program.

 

21


Table of Contents

Microsoft Business Solutions revenue for the first six months of fiscal 2004 was $318 million compared to $241 million in the prior year’s first six months. The additional sales attributable to the acquisition of Navision at the beginning of the fiscal year resulted in the majority of the revenue increase from the prior year. Microsoft Business Solutions operating loss for the first six months of fiscal 2004 declined 18% led by the 32% increase in revenue, partially offset by a 10% increase in operating expenses primarily related to stock based compensation expense from the employee stock option transfer program.

 

MSN

 

MSN revenue totaled $546 million in the second quarter growing 19% from the second quarter of the prior year. MSN includes MSN subscriptions and the MSN network of Internet products and services. MSN Network services revenue grew $93 million or 47% as a result of growth in paid search and growth in the overall Internet advertising market. MSN subscription revenue declined $6 million or 2% as the number of subscribers continued to decline as our narrowband subscriber base continues to migrate to competitively priced broadband or other ISPs. Subscription revenue may decline for the remainder of the fiscal year as the overall MSN subscriber base is expected to continue to decline. MSN incurred an operating loss of $79 million for the second quarter of fiscal 2004, compared to an operating loss of $197 million in the prior year’s second quarter. The operating loss in the second quarter included $144 million related to stock based compensation costs related to the employee stock option transfer program.

 

MSN revenue totaled $1.04 billion in the first six months of fiscal 2004 compared to $886 million in the prior year’s first six months. MSN Subscription revenue declined 4% or $23 million, reflecting a decrease in the overall subscriber base. MSN Network services grew 49% or $174 million as a result of Internet advertising revenue. MSN reported an operating loss of $21 million compared to a loss of $344 million in the first six months of the prior year. The improvement in operating results was driven primarily from lower operating expenses and a $48 million one-time refund of prior year taxes, partially offset by the costs related to the employee stock option transfer program which was recorded in the second quarter of fiscal 2004.

 

Mobile and Embedded Devices

 

Mobile and Embedded Devices second quarter revenue totaled $63 million, compared to $38 million in the prior year’s second quarter. Mobile and Embedded Devices includes Windows Mobile software, Windows Embedded device operating systems, MapPoint, and Windows Automotive. The increase in revenue was driven by growth in all businesses. The revenue growth realized by MapPoint is expected to ease in future quarters, as the year-over-year growth reflects the addition of revenue from the acquisition of Vicinity Corporation toward the end of the second quarter of the prior fiscal year. Mobile and Embedded Devices operating loss was 49% higher in the second quarter of fiscal 2004 compared to the prior year’s second quarter, primarily due to $58 million related to stock based compensation expense from the employee stock option transfer program, partially offset by 66% growth in revenue.

 

Fiscal 2004 revenue for the first six months totaled $116 million, compared to $66 million in the prior year’s first six months. The increase in revenue was driven by growth in all businesses. Mobile and Embedded Devices operating loss was 3% higher in the first six months of fiscal 2004 compared to the prior year’s first six months, primarily driven by stock based compensation expense from the employee stock option transfer program, partially offset by the 76% growth in revenue.

 

Home and Entertainment

 

Home and Entertainment revenue was $1.27 billion in the second quarter of fiscal 2004, declining 5% from $1.33 billion in the prior year’s second quarter. Home and Entertainment includes the Xbox video game system, PC games, consumer software and hardware, and TV platform. Xbox revenue increased $15 million or 2% from the prior year’s second quarter, with $175 million related to higher volumes of Xbox software, offset by a $37 million decline due to lower Xbox console volumes and a $123 million decrease related to price reductions of

 

22


Table of Contents

Xbox consoles and software. Xbox console volumes declined 6%. This decline primarily reflects a change in the timing of the introduction of our Xbox holiday offering, which in fiscal 2004 occurred in the first quarter and in fiscal 2003 occurred in the second quarter. Xbox’s life to date U.S. games attach rate according to NPD data was 6.4 games per console with over 400 games available. Revenue from consumer hardware and software and PC games declined $78 million or 18% compared to the second quarter of fiscal 2003 due to stronger sales of our PC games software titles in the prior year and a decline in revenue from PC gaming devices.

 

Home and Entertainment operating loss for the second quarter of fiscal year 2004 improved 4% from the second quarter of fiscal year 2003 driven by increasing margins from a shift in the product mix toward higher margin Xbox software for the Xbox console, lower product development costs and lower marketing costs, partially offset by stock based compensation associated with the employee stock option transfer program.

 

Home and Entertainment revenue was $1.85 billion in the first six months of fiscal 2004, increasing 2% from $1.81 billion in the prior year’s first six months. Xbox revenue increased $68 million or 6% from the prior year’s first six months, with $177 million related to higher volumes of Xbox software and $46 million increase due to higher Xbox console volumes and a $155 million decrease related to price reductions of Xbox consoles and software. Xbox console volumes increased 5%. Revenue from consumer hardware and software and PC games declined $35 million or 5% compared to the prior year’s first six months due to a decline in revenue from PC gaming devices.

 

Home and Entertainment operating loss for the first six months of fiscal year 2004 increased 2% from the first six months of fiscal year 2003 driven by 2% growth in operating expenses, including stock based compensation costs associated with the employee stock option transfer program.

 

Cost of revenue

 

Cost of revenue includes manufacturing and distribution costs for products and programs sold, operation costs related to product support service centers and product distribution centers, costs incurred to support and maintain Internet-based products and services, and costs associated with the delivery of consulting services. Cost of revenue was $2.34 billion, or 23.1% of revenue, in the second quarter, compared to $2.14 billion, or 25.0% of revenue, in the second quarter of the prior year. The increase in absolute dollars resulted primarily from $215 million in stock based compensation expense associated with the employee stock option transfer program. The increase in absolute dollars in cost of revenue was partially offset by a 12% decrease in Home & Entertainment costs, due to a decrease in Xbox console units sold and lower costs of producing the Xbox console and higher margined Xbox games sold. Cost of revenue was $3.82 billion, or 20.8% of revenue, in the first six months of fiscal 2004, compared to $3.48 billion, or 21.4% of revenue, in the first six months of the prior year. The cost of sales growth was primarily driven by stock based compensation expense from the employee stock option transfer program and an increase in product support and consulting services, partially offset by a decline in Xbox consoles product costs.

 

Research and development

 

Research and development expenses include payroll, employee benefits, equity compensation and other headcount-related costs associated with product development. Research and development expenses also include third-party development and programming costs, localization costs incurred to translate software for international markets, and the amortization of purchased software code and services content. Research and development expenses in the second quarter of fiscal 2004 were $2.97 billion, 29.3% of revenue, compared to $1.52 billion, 17.7% of revenue, in the second quarter of the prior year. The increase was primarily due to $1.31 billion in stock based compensation expense from the employee stock option transfer program and $167 million or 14% increase in headcount-related costs. Research and development expenses for the first six months of fiscal 2004 were $4.58 billion, 24.9% of revenue, an increase of 42% over the first six months of the prior year. The six month increase was primarily due to the stock based compensation expense from the employee stock option transfer program and $105 million or 4% increase in other headcount-related costs.

 

23


Table of Contents

Sales and marketing

 

Sales and marketing expenses include payroll, employee benefits, equity compensation and other headcount-related costs associated with sales and marketing personnel and advertising, promotions, tradeshows, seminars, and other programs. Sales and marketing expenses were $2.47 billion in the second quarter, or 24.3% of revenue, compared to $2.16 billion in the second quarter of the prior year, or 25.3% of revenue. Sales and marketing costs increased in absolute dollars due to stock based compensation expense associated with the employee stock option transfer program. Sales and marketing expenses were $3.97 billion for the first six months of fiscal 2004, or 21.6% of revenue, compared to $3.57 billion in the first six months of fiscal 2003, or 21.9% of revenue. The absolute dollar increase was due to the stock based compensation expense related to the employee stock option transfer program and $53 million or 3% increase in other headcount related costs.

 

General and administrative

 

General and administrative costs include payroll, employee benefits, equity compensation and other headcount-related costs associated with the finance, legal, facilities, certain human resources and other administrative headcount, and legal and other administrative fees. General and administrative costs were $896 million in the second quarter compared to $497 million in the comparable quarter of the prior year. General and administrative costs increased in the second quarter primarily from $280 million in stock based compensation expense and $19 million in fees and expenses associated with the employee stock option transfer program as well as higher legal costs including settlement costs and headcount-related expenses. For the first six months of fiscal 2004, general and administrative costs were $1.37 billion compared to $749 million in the first six months of the prior year. General and administrative costs in the second quarter of fiscal 2003 included a charge of approximately $210 million related to the settlement of class action lawsuits. The second quarter of fiscal 2004 included the expenses associated with the employee stock option transfer program and certain settlement costs.

 

NON-OPERATING ITEMS, INVESTMENT INCOME, AND INCOME TAXES

 

Losses on equity investees and other incorporates Microsoft’s share of income or loss from equity method investments and income or loss attributable to minority interests. Losses on equity investees and other declined to $5 million in the second quarter of fiscal 2004, compared to $12 million in the comparable quarter of fiscal 2003. Losses on equity investees and other declined to $15 million in the first six months of fiscal 2004, compared to $34 million in the comparable period of fiscal 2003. These decreases were a result of reduced losses and increased income generated by the equity investees for the period ended December 31, 2003, as well as a reduction in the number of equity investees through sale of investments in fiscal year 2003.

 

The components of investment income are as follows:

 

    

Three Months

Ended

Dec. 31


  

Six Months

Ended

Dec. 31


(In millions)


   2002

    2003

   2002

    2003

Dividends and interest

   $ 515     $ 521    $ 1,031     $ 1,005

Net gains (losses) on investments

     (104 )     310      (232 )     555

Net gains (losses) on derivatives

     (36 )     11      (383 )     45
    


 

  


 

Investment income

   $ 375     $ 842    $ 416     $ 1,605
    


 

  


 

 

Dividends and interest income was relatively consistent for both the comparable quarterly and six month periods even though the overall portfolio earning such income increased mainly due to the non-recurring dividends earned in the prior comparable periods related to the AT&T 5% convertible preferred debt holding. Net gains (losses) on investments includes other-than-temporary impairments of $43 million in the second quarter of fiscal 2004 compared to $421 million in the second quarter of the prior year, and $61 million for the six month period ended December 31, 2003 compared to $855 million in the prior year comparable period and were down mainly due to improved market conditions. Realized gains from investments increased to $353 million compared

 

24


Table of Contents

to $317 million in the second quarter of the prior year, and were $616 million compared to $623 million in the six month period of the prior year. Net losses on derivative instruments of $383 million for the six month period ended December 31, 2002 were driven mainly by the impact of decreasing interest rates on interest rate sensitive instruments noted during the first quarter of fiscal 2003.

 

Income Taxes

 

The effective tax rate for both the second quarter and first six months of fiscal 2004 is approximately 33%. The effective tax rate for fiscal 2003 was 32%, reflecting a benefit in the second quarter of $126 million from the reversal of previously accrued taxes.

 

STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION

 

Effective July 1, 2003, we adopted the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, using the retroactive restatement method described in SFAS 148, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation—Transition and Disclosure. Under the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS 123, stock-based compensation cost is measured at the grant date based on the value of the award and is recognized as expense over the vesting period. Stock-based employee compensation expense was $1.06 billion ($709 million after-tax or $0.07 per diluted share) and $2.11 billion ($1.41 billion after-tax or $0.13 per diluted share) for the three and six months ended December 31, 2002, respectively, and $3.23 billion ($2.17 billion after-tax or $0.20 per diluted share) and $4.25 billion ($2.85 billion after-tax or $0.26 per diluted share) for the three and six months ended December 31, 2003, respectively. The amounts for the three and six months ended December 31, 2003 include $2.21 billion ($1.48 billion after-tax or $0.14 per diluted share) due to the stock option transfer program, which is described below. The June 30, 2003 balance sheet has been restated for the retroactive adoption of the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS 123 which resulted in a $13.89 billion increase in common stock and paid-in capital, a $10.00 billion decrease in retained earnings, and a $3.89 billion increase in deferred income taxes.

 

In fiscal year 2004, we implemented changes in employee compensation designed to help us continue to attract and retain the best employees, and to better align employee interests with those of our shareholders. Employees are now granted stock awards instead of stock options. The stock award program offers employees the opportunity to earn shares of our stock over time, rather than options that give employees the right to purchase stock at a set price. We also completed an employee stock option transfer program in the second quarter of fiscal 2004 whereby employees could elect to transfer all of their vested and unvested stock options with a strike price of $33 or higher (“eligible options”) to JPMorgan. The unvested eligible options that were transferred to JPMorgan became vested upon the transfer. The price paid by JPMorgan for the transferred options was determined by reference to the arithmetic average of the closing prices of Microsoft common stock during the period from November 14, 2003 to December 8, 2003, which was $25.5720.

 

A total of 18,503 (51%) of the 36,539 eligible Microsoft employees elected to participate in the stock option transfer program and 344.6 million (55%) of the 621.4 million eligible options were tendered. Under the terms of the program, JPMorgan paid Microsoft $382 million for the transferred options. Microsoft made an initial payment of $219 million to participating employees for the transferred options, with a remaining portion to be paid in one or more payments that are subject to participating employees’ continued employment over the next two or three years. The options that were transferred to JPMorgan resulted in stock-based compensation expense of $2.21 billion ($1.48 billion after-tax or $0.14 per diluted share). This expense consists of the unrecognized compensation costs of the options that were transferred, less the amounts payable applicable to those previously unvested options for which payment is contingent upon continued employment of participating employees. The contingent payments applicable to unvested eligible options that are subject to continued employment of participating employees will be recognized as compensation expense over the vesting period of the contingent payments.

 

The stock option transfer program also resulted in a decrease to our long term deferred tax assets due to the excess of recorded compensation expense for these options over the related tax deduction reported on our tax

 

25


Table of Contents

return. For the six months ended December 31, 2003, deferred tax assets were reduced by approximately $2.01 billion with an offsetting reduction in paid-in capital, reflecting the reduction of previously recorded deductions reported on our tax return in excess of stock based compensation expense.

 

FINANCIAL CONDITION

 

Cash and short-term investments totaled $52.78 billion as of December 31, 2003 compared to $49.05 billion as of June 30, 2003. The portfolio consists primarily of fixed-income securities, diversified among industries and individual issuers. Our investments are generally liquid and investment grade securities. The portfolio is invested predominantly in U.S. dollar denominated securities, but also includes foreign currency positions, in order to diversify financial risk.

 

Unearned revenue as of December 31, 2003 decreased $395 million from September 30, 2003 reflecting a sequential decrease in unearned revenue associated with Upgrade Advantage contracts billed in prior periods and lower average deferral rates on Windows and Office partially offset by sequential growth in new and recurring multi-year licensing agreements.

 

Cash and short-term investments totaled $52.78 billion as of December 31, 2003. Cash flow from operations was $8.0 billion in the first six months of fiscal 2004, a decrease of $941 million from the first six months of the prior year. The decrease reflects an approximately $2.22 billion decline in cash flow from unearned revenue resulting from a decline in multi-year contract billings, build up in accounts receivable, and gains on our portfolio investments. Cash used for financing was $2.62 billion in the first six months of fiscal 2004, a decrease of $909 million from the first six months of the prior year, reflecting a decrease of approximately $2.66 billion in stock repurchases, partially offset by a cash dividend of $1.73 billion. During the first six months of fiscal 2004, we repurchased 73.8 million shares of common stock, compared to 159.4 million shares of common stock in the comparable period of the prior year. Cash used for investing was $5.70 billion in the first six months of fiscal 2004, an increase of approximately $2.78 billion from the first six months of the prior year.

 

We have no material long-term debt. Stockholders’ equity at December 31, 2003 was $69.34 billion. We will continue to invest in sales, marketing, product support infrastructure, and existing and advanced areas of technology. Additions to property and equipment will continue, including new facilities and computer systems for R&D, sales and marketing, support, and administrative staff. Commitments for constructing new buildings were $153 million on December 31, 2003. We have not engaged in any related party transactions or arrangements with unconsolidated entities or other persons that are reasonably likely to materially affect liquidity or the availability of or requirements for capital resources.

 

We believe existing cash and short-term investments together with funds generated from operations should be sufficient to meet operating requirements. Our philosophy regarding the maintenance of a balance sheet with a large component of cash and short-term investments, as well as equity and other investments, reflects our views on potential future capital requirements relating to research and development, creation and expansion of sales distribution channels, investments and acquisitions, share dilution management, legal risks, and challenges to our business model. We continuously assess our investment management approach in view of our current and potential future needs.

 

Off-balance sheet arrangements

 

We have unconditionally guaranteed the repayment of certain Japanese Yen denominated bank loans and related interest and fees of Jupiter Telecommunication, Ltd., a Japanese cable company (Jupiter). These guarantees arose on February 1, 2003 in conjunction with the expiration of prior financing arrangements, including previous guarantees by us. The financing arrangements were entered into by Jupiter as part of financing its operations. As part of Jupiter’s new financing agreement, we agreed to guarantee repayment by Jupiter of the loans of approximately $55 million. The estimated fair value and the carrying value of the guarantees was $10.5 million and did not result in a charge to operations. The guarantees are in effect until the earlier of repayment of

 

26


Table of Contents

the loans, including accrued interest and fees, or February 1, 2009. The maximum amount of the guarantees is limited to the sum of the total due and unpaid principal amounts, accrued and unpaid interest, and any other related expenses. Additionally, the maximum amount of the guarantees, denominated in Japanese yen, will vary based on fluctuations in foreign exchange rates. If we were required to make payments under the guarantees, we may recover all or a portion of those payments upon liquidation of Jupiter’s assets. The proceeds from such liquidation cannot be accurately estimated due to the multitude of factors that would affect the valuation and realization of the proceeds in the event of liquidation.

 

In connection with various operating leases, we issued residual value guarantees, which provide that if we do not purchase the leased property from the lessor at the end of the lease term, then we are liable to the lessor for an amount equal to the shortage (if any) between the proceeds from the sale of the property and an agreed value. As of December 31, 2003, the maximum amount of the residual value guarantees was approximately $271 million. We believe that proceeds from the sale of properties under operating leases would exceed the payment obligation and therefore no liability to us currently exists.

 

We provide indemnifications of varying scope and size to certain customers against claims of intellectual property infringement made by third parties arising from the use of our products. We evaluate estimated losses for such indemnifications under SFAS 5, Accounting for Contingencies, as interpreted by FASB Interpretation 45, Guarantor’s Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others (FIN 45). We consider such factors as the degree of probability of an unfavorable outcome and the ability to make a reasonable estimate of the amount of loss. To date, we have not encountered material costs as a result of such obligations and have not accrued any liabilities related to such indemnifications in our financial statements.

 

RECENTLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING STANDARDS

 

In December 2003, the FASB issued Interpretation 46R (FIN 46R), a revision to Interpretation 46 (FIN 46), Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities. FIN 46R clarifies some of the provisions of FIN 46 and exempts certain entities from its requirements. FIN 46R is effective at the end of the first interim period ending after March 15, 2004. Entities that have adopted FIN 46 prior to this effective date can continue to apply the provisions of FIN 46 until the effective date of FIN 46R. Microsoft adopted FIN 46 on July 1, 2003 and it did not have a material impact on our financial statements. The early adoption of FIN46R did not have a material impact on our financial statements.

 

APPLICATION OF CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES

 

Our financial statements and accompanying notes are prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP. Preparing financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue, and expenses. These estimates and assumptions are affected by management’s application of accounting policies. Critical accounting policies for us include revenue recognition, accounting for stock-based compensation, impairment of investment securities, impairment of goodwill, accounting for research and development costs, accounting for legal contingencies, and accounting for income taxes.

 

We account for the licensing of software in accordance with American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) Statement of Position (SOP) 97-2, Software Revenue Recognition. The application of SOP 97-2 requires judgment, including whether a software arrangement includes multiple elements, and if so, whether vendor-specific objective evidence (VSOE) of fair value exists for those elements. End users receive certain elements of our products over a period of time. These elements include free post-delivery telephone support and the right to receive unspecified upgrades/enhancements of Microsoft Internet Explorer on a when-and-if-available basis, the fair value of which is recognized over the product’s estimated life cycle. Changes to the elements in a software arrangement, the ability to identify VSOE for those elements, the fair value of the respective elements, and changes to a product’s estimated life cycle could materially impact the amount of

 

27


Table of Contents

earned and unearned revenue. Judgment is also required to assess whether future releases of certain software represent new products or upgrades and enhancements to existing products.

 

We account for stock-based compensation in accordance with the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS 123. The application of SFAS 123 requires judgment, including the expected life and stock price volatility for stock options and expected dividends and forfeitures for all stock-based awards. Changes in the expected or actual outcome of forfeitures due to service- and/or performance-related conditions could materially impact the amount of stock-based compensation expense recognized.

 

SFAS 115, Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities, and Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB) 59, Accounting for Noncurrent Marketable Equity Securities, provide guidance on determining when an investment is other-than-temporarily impaired. This determination requires significant judgment. In making this judgment, we evaluate, among other factors, the duration and extent to which the fair value of an investment is less than its cost; the financial health of and near-term business outlook for the investee, including factors such as industry and sector performance, changes in technology, and operational and financing cash flow; and our intent and ability to hold the investment.

 

SFAS 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, requires that goodwill be tested for impairment at the reporting unit level (operating segment or one level below an operating segment) on an annual basis (July 1st for Microsoft) and between annual tests in certain circumstances. Application of the goodwill impairment test requires judgment, including the identification of reporting units, assigning assets and liabilities to reporting units, assigning goodwill to reporting units, and determining the fair value of each reporting unit. Significant judgments required to estimate the fair value of reporting units include estimating future cash flows, determining appropriate discount rates and other assumptions. Changes in these estimates and assumptions could materially affect the determination of fair value and/or goodwill impairment for each reporting unit.

 

We account for research and development costs in accordance with several accounting pronouncements, including SFAS 2, Accounting for Research and Development Costs, and SFAS 86, Accounting for the Costs of Computer Software to be Sold, Leased, or Otherwise Marketed. SFAS 86 specifies that costs incurred internally in creating a computer software product should be charged to expense when incurred as research and development until technological feasibility has been established for the product. Once technological feasibility is established, all software costs should be capitalized until the product is available for general release to customers. Judgment is required in determining when technological feasibility of a product is established. We have determined that technological feasibility for our products is reached shortly before the products are released to manufacturing. Costs incurred after technological feasibility is established are not material, and accordingly, we expense all research and development costs when incurred.

 

We are subject to various legal proceedings and claims, the outcomes of which are subject to significant uncertainty. SFAS 5, Accounting for Contingencies, requires that an estimated loss from a loss contingency should be accrued by a charge to income if it is probable that an asset has been impaired or a liability has been incurred and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated. Disclosure of a contingency is required if there is at least a reasonable possibility that a loss has been incurred. We evaluate, among other factors, the degree of probability of an unfavorable outcome and the ability to make a reasonable estimate of the amount of loss. Changes in these factors could materially impact our financial position or our results of operations.

 

SFAS 109, Accounting for Income Taxes, establishes financial accounting and reporting standards for the effect of income taxes. The objectives of accounting for income taxes are to recognize the amount of taxes payable or refundable for the current year and deferred tax liabilities and assets for the future tax consequences of events that have been recognized in an entity’s financial statements or tax returns. Judgment is required in assessing the future tax consequences of events that have been recognized in our financial statements or tax returns. Fluctuations in the actual outcome of these future tax consequences could materially impact our financial position or our results of operations.

 

28


Table of Contents

ISSUES AND UNCERTAINTIES

 

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains statements that are forward-looking. These statements are based on current expectations and assumptions that are subject to risks and uncertainties. Actual results could differ materially because of issues and uncertainties such as those listed below and elsewhere in this report, which, among others, should be considered in evaluating our financial outlook.

 

Challenges to our Business Model

 

Since our inception, our business model has been based upon customers agreeing to pay a fee to license software developed and distributed by us. Under this commercial software model, software developers bear the costs of converting original ideas into software products through investments in research and development, offsetting these costs with the revenue received from the distribution of their products. We believe the commercial software model has had substantial benefits for users of software, allowing them to rely on our expertise and the expertise of other software developers that have powerful incentives to develop innovative software that is useful, reliable, and compatible with other software and hardware. In recent years, there has been a growing challenge to the commercial software model, often referred to as the Open Source model. Under the Open Source model, software is produced by loosely associated groups of unpaid programmers, and the resulting software and the intellectual property contained therein is licensed to end users at substantially no cost. The most notable example of Open Source software is the Linux operating system. While we believe that our products provide customers with significant advantages in security and productivity, and generally have a lower total cost of ownership than Open Source software, the popularization of the Open Source model continues to pose a significant challenge to our business model, including recent efforts by proponents of the Open Source model to convince governments worldwide to mandate the use of Open Source software in their purchase and deployment of software products. To the extent the Open Source model gains increasing market acceptance, sales of our products may decline, we may have to reduce the prices we charge for our products, and revenue and operating margins may consequently decline.

 

Intellectual Property Rights

 

We defend our intellectual property rights, but unlicensed copying and use of software and intellectual property rights represents a loss of revenue to us. While this adversely affects U.S. revenue, the impact on revenue from outside the United States is more significant, particularly in countries where laws are less protective of intellectual property rights. Throughout the world, we actively educate consumers about the benefits of licensing genuine products and educate lawmakers about the advantages of a business climate where intellectual property rights are protected. However, continued educational and enforcement efforts may not affect revenue positively and further deterioration in compliance with existing legal protections or reductions in the legal protection for intellectual property rights of software developers could adversely affect revenue.

 

From time to time we receive notices from others claiming we infringe their intellectual property rights. The number of these claims may grow. Responding to these claims may require us to enter into royalty and licensing agreements on unfavorable terms, require us to stop selling or to redesign affected products, or to pay damages or to satisfy indemnification commitments with our customers.

 

We have made and expect to continue making significant expenditures to acquire the use of technology and intellectual property rights, including via cross-licenses of broad patent portfolios.

 

New Products and Services

 

We have made significant investments in research, development and marketing for new products, services and technologies, including Longhorn, Microsoft .NET, Xbox, business applications, MSN, mobile and wireless technologies. Significant revenue from new product and service investments may not be achieved for a number of years, if at all. Moreover, some of these products and services may not be profitable, and even if they are profitable, operating margins for these businesses may not be as high as the margins we have historically experienced.

 

29


Table of Contents

Litigation

 

As discussed in Note 10 – Contingencies of the Notes to Financial Statements, we are subject to a variety of claims and lawsuits. Adverse outcomes in some or all of the pending cases may result in significant monetary damages or injunctive relief against us. We are also subject to a variety of other claims and suits that arise from time to time in the ordinary course of our business. While management currently believes that resolving all of these matters, individually or in the aggregate, will not have a material adverse impact on our financial position or results of operations, the litigation and other claims noted above are subject to inherent uncertainties and management’s view of these matters may change in the future. If an unfavorable final outcome occurs, there exists the possibility of a material adverse impact on our financial position and the results of operations for the period in which the effect becomes reasonably estimable.

 

Security

 

Maintaining the security of computers and computer networks is an issue of critical importance for Microsoft and our customers. There are individuals and groups who develop and deploy viruses, worms and other malicious software programs that attack our products. While this is an industry-wide phenomenon that affects computers across all platforms, Microsoft’s customers have been victims of such attacks and will likely continue to be so. We are devoting significant resources to addressing these critical issues. We are focusing our efforts on engineering more secure products, optimizing security and reliability options and settings when we deliver products, and providing guidance to help our customers make the best use of our products and services to protect against computer viruses and other attacks on their computing environment. In addition, we are working to improve the deployment of software patches to address security vulnerabilities discovered after our products are released. We are also investing in mitigation technologies that secure customers from attacks even when such software patches are not deployed. We are also advising customers on how to help protect themselves from security threats through the use of our online automated security tools, our published security guidance and the deployment of security software such as firewalls, antivirus and other security software. These steps could adversely affect our operating margins. Despite these efforts, actual or perceived security vulnerabilities in our products could lead some customers to seek to return products, to reduce or delay future purchases or to purchase competitive products. Customers may also increase their expenditures on protecting their computer systems from attack, which could delay adoption of new technologies. Any of these actions by customers could adversely affect our revenue.

 

Declines in Demand for Software

 

If overall market demand for PCs, servers and other computing devices declines significantly, or consumer or corporate spending for such products declines, our revenue will be adversely affected. Additionally, our revenue would be unfavorably impacted if customers reduce their purchases of new software products or upgrades to existing products because new product offerings are not perceived as adding significant new functionality or other value to prospective purchasers. A significant number of customers purchased license agreements providing upgrade rights to specific licensed products prior to the transition to Licensing 6.0 in July 2002. These agreements will expire in fiscal year 2004 and 2005 and the rate at which such customers renew these contracts could adversely affect future revenue. We are making significant investments in the next release of the Windows operating system, codenamed Longhorn. If this system is not perceived as offering significant new functionality or value to prospective purchasers, our revenue and operating margins could be adversely affected.

 

Product Development Schedule

 

The development of software products is a complex and time-consuming process. New products and enhancements to existing products can require long development and testing periods. Significant delays in new product releases or significant problems in creating new products, particularly any delays in the Longhorn operating system, could adversely affect our revenue.

 

30


Table of Contents

General Economic and Geo-Political Risks

 

Softness in corporate information technology spending or other changes in general economic conditions that affect demand for computer hardware or software could adversely affect our revenue. Terrorist activity and armed conflict pose the additional risk of general economic disruption and could require changes in our international operations and security arrangements, thus increasing our operating costs. These conditions lend additional uncertainty to the timing and budget for technology investment decisions by our customers.

 

Competition

 

We continue to experience intensive competition across all markets for our products and services. These competitive pressures may result in decreased sales volumes, price reductions, and/or increased operating costs, such as for marketing and sales incentives, resulting in lower revenue, gross margins and operating income.

 

Taxation of Extraterritorial Income

 

In August 2001, a World Trade Organization (“WTO”) dispute panel determined that the tax provisions of the FSC Repeal and Extraterritorial Income Exclusion Act of 2000 (“ETI”) constitute an export subsidy prohibited by the WTO Agreement on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures. The U.S. government appealed the panel’s decision and lost its appeal. On October 1, 2003 the Senate Finance Committee approved the Jumpstart our Business Strength (JOBS) Act that would repeal ETI, provide a three year phase-out of current ETI benefits, and would replace ETI with a phased in production activity exclusion that would not be fully effective until 2012. On October 28, 2003, the House Ways & Means Committee approved the American Jobs Creation Act of 2003 that would likewise repeal ETI, provide a three year phase-out of future ETI benefits, and would replace ETI with a phased-in tax rate reduction that would not be fully effective until 2007. Both bills carry over to the 2004 session of this Congress. While neither bill will fully replace our current ETI tax benefits, both bills must still pass their respective chambers and be reconciled in conference, so we remain unable to assess the ultimate form and financial impact of this legislation, if enacted. If the ETI provisions are repealed and financially comparable replacement tax legislation is not enacted, the loss of the ETI tax benefit to us could be significant.

 

Other Potential Tax Liabilities

 

We are subject to income taxes in both the United States and numerous foreign jurisdictions. Significant judgment is required in determining our worldwide provision for income taxes. In the ordinary course of our business, there are many transactions and calculations where the ultimate tax determination is uncertain. We are regularly under audit by tax authorities. Although we believe our tax estimates are reasonable, the final determination of tax audits and any related litigation could be materially different than that which is reflected in historical income tax provisions and accruals. Should additional taxes be assessed as a result of an audit or litigation, a material effect on our income tax provision and net income in the period or periods for which that determination is made could result.

 

Finite Insurance Programs

 

In addition to conventional third party insurance arrangements, we have entered into captive insurance arrangements for the purpose of protecting against possible catastrophic and other risks not covered by traditional insurance markets. As of December 31, 2003, potential coverage available under captive insurance arrangements was $2.0 billion, subject to deductibles, exclusions, and other restrictions. While we believe these arrangements are an effective way to insure against such risks, the potential liabilities associated with certain of the issues and uncertainties discussed herein or other events could exceed the coverage provided by such arrangements.

 

Business Disruptions in the Event of a Catastrophic Event

 

We are a highly automated business and a disruption or failure of our systems in the event of a major earthquake, cyber-attack, terrorist attack or other catastrophic event could cause delays in completing sales and

 

31


Table of Contents

providing services. Our corporate headquarters, a significant portion of our research and development activities and certain other critical business operations are located in the Seattle, Washington area, and we have other business operations in the Silicon Valley area of California, both of which are near major earthquake faults. A catastrophic event that results in the destruction or disruption of any of our critical business or information technology systems could severely affect our ability to conduct normal business operations and as a result our future operating results could be adversely affected.

 

Other

 

Other issues and uncertainties may include: warranty and other claims for hardware products such as Xbox; the effects of the Consent Decree in U.S. v. Microsoft and Final Judgment in State of New York v. Microsoft on the Windows operating system and server business, including those associated with protocol and other disclosures required by the Decree and Final Judgment and the ability of PC manufacturers to hide end user access to certain new Windows features; the continued availability of third party distribution channels for MSN service and other online services; factors associated with our international operations, and financial market volatility or other changes affecting the value of our investments, such as the Comcast Corporation securities held by us, that may result in a reduction in carrying value and recognition of losses including impairment charges.

 

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

 

We are exposed to foreign currency, interest rate, and fixed income and equity price risks. A portion of these risks is hedged, but fluctuations could impact our results of operations and financial position. We hedge a portion of anticipated revenue and accounts receivable exposure to foreign currency fluctuations, primarily with option contracts. We monitor our foreign currency exposures daily to maximize the overall effectiveness of our foreign currency hedge positions. Principal currencies hedged include the Euro, Japanese yen, British pound, and Canadian dollar. Fixed income securities are subject to interest rate risk. The portfolio is diversified and structured to minimize credit risk. Securities held in our equity and other investments portfolio are subject to price risk, and are generally not hedged. However, we use options to hedge our price risk on certain highly volatile equity securities that are held primarily for strategic purposes.

 

We use a value-at-risk (VAR) model to estimate and quantify our market risks. VAR is the expected loss, for a given confidence level, in fair value of our portfolio due to adverse market movements over a defined time horizon. The VAR model is not intended to represent actual losses in fair value, but is used as a risk estimation and management tool. The model used for currencies and equities is geometric Brownian motion, which allows incorporation of optionality with regard to these risk exposures. For interest rate risk, the mean reverting geometric Brownian motion is used to reflect the principle that fixed-income securities prices revert to maturity value over time.

 

Value-at-risk is calculated by, first, simulating 10,000 market price paths over 20 days for equities, interest rates and foreign exchange rates, taking into account historical correlations among the different rates and prices. Each resulting unique set of equities prices, interest rates, and foreign exchange rates is applied to substantially all individual holdings to re-price each holding. The 250th worst performance (out of 10,000) represents the value-at-risk over 20 days at the 97.5th percentile confidence level. Several risk factors are not captured in the model, including liquidity risk, operational risk, credit risk, and legal risk.

 

Certain securities in our equity portfolio are held for strategic purposes. We hedge the value of a portion of these securities through the use of derivative contracts such as put-call collars. In these arrangements, we hedge a security’s market risk below the purchased put strike and forgo most or all of the benefits of the security’s appreciation above the sold call strike, in exchange for premium received for the sold call. We also hold equity securities for general investment return purposes. We have incurred material impairment charges related to these securities in prior periods. The VAR amounts disclosed below are used as a risk management tool and reflect an estimate of potential reductions in fair value of our portfolio. Losses in fair value over a 20-day holding period

 

32


Table of Contents

can exceed the reported VAR by significant amounts and can also accumulate over a longer time horizon than the 20-day holding period used in the VAR analysis. VAR amounts are not necessarily reflective of potential accounting losses, including determinations of other-than-temporary losses in fair value in accordance with U.S. GAAP.

 

The VAR numbers are shown separately for interest rate, currency, and equity risks. These VAR numbers include the underlying portfolio positions and related hedges. We use historical data to estimate VAR. Given reliance on historical data, VAR is most effective in estimating risk exposures in markets in which there are no fundamental changes or shifts in market conditions. An inherent limitation in VAR is that the distribution of past changes in market risk factors may not produce accurate predictions of future market risk.

 

The following table sets forth the VAR calculations for substantially all of the Company’s positions:

 

(In millions)    June 30,
2003


   Dec. 31,
2003


   Three Months Ended Dec. 31, 2003

Risk Categories


             Average    

       High    

       Low    

Interest Rates

   $ 448    $ 767    $ 757    $ 817    $ 642

Currency Rates

     141      216      213      267      152

Equity Prices

     869      994      996      1,081      913

 

The total VAR for the combined risk categories is $987 million at June 30, 2003 and $1.33 billion at December 31, 2003. The total VAR is 32% less at June 30, 2003 and 33% less at December 31, 2003 than the sum of the separate risk categories for each of those years in the above table, due to the diversification benefit of the combination of risks. The change in VAR is due primarily to asset allocation shifts, increased foreign exchange volatility, and portfolio growth.

 

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

 

Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, we have evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(c) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that these disclosure controls and procedures are effective. There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended December 31, 2003 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal controls over financial reporting.

 

33


Table of Contents

Part II. Other Information

 

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

 

See notes to financial statements.

 

In the previously reported case of Imagexpo v. Microsoft, in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, the plaintiff accused the whiteboarding feature of the NetMeeting functionality in Windows of infringement. On November 14, 2003, the jury found Microsoft liable for willful infringement and awarded $62.3 million in damages. On December 30, 2003 we entered an agreement with the plaintiff pursuant to which we paid $60 million in exchange for dismissal of the case and a paid-up license to patents of ImageExpo and related companies.

 

Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

 

The Annual Meeting of Shareholders was held on November 11, 2003.

 

The following proposals were adopted by the margins indicated:

 

1. To elect a Board of Directors to hold office until the next annual meeting of shareholders and until their successors are elected and qualified.

 

     Number of Shares

     For

   Withheld

William H. Gates III

   9,091,941,264    262,764,184

Steven A. Ballmer

   9,091,832,976    262,872,472

James I. Cash, Jr.

   8,763,216,892    591,488,556

Raymond V. Gilmartin

   8,823,242,145    531,463,303

Ann McLaughlin Korologos

   8,815,461,873    539,243,575

David F. Marquardt

   9,091,568,427    263,137,021

Charles H. Noski

   9,089,298,739    265,406,709

Helmut Panke

   9,090,402,253    264,303,195

Wm. G. Reed, Jr.

   9,030,465,947    324,239,501

Jon A. Shirley

   7,013,929,267    2,340,776,181

 

2. To adopt amendments to the 2001 Stock Plan.

 

For

   5,961,061,877

Against

   1,289,253,004

Abstain

   88,502,310

Broker non-vote

   2,015,888,257

 

3. To adopt amendments to the 1999 Stock Option Plan for Non-Employee Directors.

 

For

   5,705,203,349

Against

   1,533,602,969

Abstain

   100,010,867

Broker non-vote

   2,015,888,263

 

The following proposal was not adopted by the margin indicated:

 

4. Shareholder proposal requesting that the Company refrain from making direct charitable contributions.

 

For

   130,783,517

Against

   6,591,845,929

Abstain

   616,189,337

Broker non-vote

   2,015,886,665

 

34


Table of Contents

Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K

 

(A) EXHIBITS

 

4    Call Option Transaction Confirmation dated December 11, 2003 between Microsoft Corporation and JPMorgan Chase Bank
10.1    Microsoft Corporation 2001 Stock Plan (as amended and restated September 11, 2003)
10.2    Microsoft Corporation 1999 Stock Plan for Non-Employee Directors (as amended and restated September 11, 2003)
15    Letter re unaudited interim financial information
31.1    Certifications of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
31.2    Certifications of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32    Certifications of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

 

(B) REPORTS ON FORM 8-K

 

We filed a report on Form 8-K on October 24, 2003 reporting that on October 23, 2003 we issued a press release announcing our financial results for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2003 and filed portions of the press release as an exhibit to that report. We furnished to the SEC reports on Form 8-K on October 23, 2003 and November 13, 2003. The October 23, 2003 Form 8-K was for the purpose of furnishing the press release announcing our financial results for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2003. The November 13, 2003 Form 8-K was for the purpose of furnishing our consolidated balance sheets as of June 30, 2003 and September 30, 2003, and the related consolidated statements of income, cash flows, and stockholders’ equity for the three months ended September 30, 2002 and 2003 formatted in XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting Language) 2.0 format.

 

Items 2, 3, and 5 are not applicable and have been omitted.

 

35


Table of Contents

SIGNATURE

 

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

 

       

Microsoft Corporation

Date: February 6, 2004

     

By:

 

/s/    JOHN G. CONNORS        


                John G. Connors
                Senior Vice President; Chief Financial Officer
               

(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer

and Duly Authorized Officer)

 

36