Back to GetFilings.com

Table of Contents

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, DC 20549

FORM 10-K

(Mark One)

For the fiscal year ended September 30, 2003

OR

For the transition period from              to             

Commission File Number: 33-98490

Commission File Number: 333-103873

STAR GAS PARTNERS, L.P.

STAR GAS FINANCE COMPANY

(Exact name of registrants as specified in its charters)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  x     No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).    Yes   x     No  ¨

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.  x

The aggregate market value of Star Gas Partners, L.P. Common Units held by non-affiliates of Star Gas Partners, L.P. on March 31, 2003 was approximately $558,527,834. As of December 8, 2003, the registrants had units and shares outstanding for each of the issuers classes of common stock as follows:

Documents Incorporated by Reference: None

Table of Contents

STAR GAS PARTNERS, L.P.

2003 FORM 10-K ANNUAL REPORT

TABLE OF CONTENTS

2

Table of Contents

PART I

ITEM 1. BUSINESS

Structure

Star Gas Partners, L.P. (“Star Gas” or the “Partnership”) is a diversified home energy distributor and services provider, specializing in heating oil, propane, natural gas and electricity. Star Gas is a master limited partnership, which at September 30, 2003 had outstanding 30.7 million common units (NYSE: “SGU” representing an 88.9% limited partner interest in Star Gas Partners) and 3.1 million senior subordinated units (NYSE: “SGH” representing a 9.1% limited partner interest in Star Gas Partners) outstanding. Additional Partnership interests include 0.3 million junior subordinated units (representing a 1.0% limited partner interest) and 0.3 million general partner units (representing a 1.0% general partner interest).

The Partnership is organized as follows:

The Partnership files annual, quarterly, current, other reports and other information with the SEC. These filings can be viewed and downloaded from the internet at the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov. In addition, these SEC filings are available at no cost as soon as reasonably practicable after the filing thereof on the Partnership’s website at www.star-gas.com/Edgar.cfm. These reports are also available to be read and copied at the SEC’s public reference room located at Judiciary Plaza, 450 5th Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20549. You may also obtain copies of these filings and other information at the offices of the New York Stock Exchange located at 11 Wall Street, New York, New York 10005.

3

Table of Contents

Seasonality

The Partnership’s fiscal year ends on September 30^th. All references in this document are to fiscal years unless otherwise noted. The seasonal nature of the Partnership’s business results in the sale of approximately 30% of its volume in the first quarter (October through December) and 45% of its volume in the second quarter (January through March) of each year, the peak heating season, because propane, heating oil and natural gas are primarily used for space heating in residential and commercial buildings. The Partnership generally realizes net income in both of these quarters and net losses during the quarters ending June and September. The Partnership typically has negative working capital at September 30, 2003 due to seasonality. In addition, sales volume typically fluctuates from year to year in response to variations in weather, wholesale energy prices and other factors. Gross profit is not only affected by weather patterns but also by changes in customer mix. For example, sales to residential customers ordinarily generate higher margins than sales to other customer groups, such as commercial or agricultural customers. In addition, gross profit margins vary by geographic region. Accordingly, gross profit margins could vary significantly from year to year in a period of identical sales volumes.

Propane

The propane segment is primarily engaged in the retail distribution of propane and related supplies and equipment to residential, commercial, industrial, agricultural and motor fuel customers. Customers are served from 123 branch locations and 126 satellite storage facilities in the Midwest, Northeast, Florida and Georgia. In addition to its retail business, the segment also serves wholesale customers. Based on sales dollars, approximately 92% of propane sales were to retail customers and approximately 8% were to wholesale customers. Retail sales have historically had a greater profit margin, more stable customer base and less price sensitivity as compared to the wholesale business.

Propane, also known as a liquid petroleum gas (lpg) ranks as the fourth most important source of residential heating in the United States, according to the U.S. Department of Energy - Energy Information Administration, 2001 Residential Energy Consumption Survey. Excluding propane gas grills, residential and commercial demand accounts for approximately 45% of all propane used in the United States. Of the 106.9 million households in the United States, 9.3 million households depend on propane for one use or another. Because 54% of these households rely on propane for their primary heating fuel, sales of propane are highly seasonal. Propane is most commonly used to provide energy to areas not serviced by the natural gas distribution system. Thus, it competes mainly with heating oil and electricity for space heating purposes. Residential customers are typically homeowners, while commercial customers include motels, restaurants, retail stores and laundromats. Industrial users, such as manufacturers, use propane as a heating and energy source in manufacturing and drying processes. In addition, propane is used to supply heat for drying crops and as a fuel source for certain vehicles.

Propane is extracted from natural gas at processing plants or separated from crude oil during the refining process. It is normally transported and stored in a liquid state under moderate pressure or refrigeration for ease of handling in shipping and distribution. When the pressure is released or the temperature is increased, propane is usable as a flammable gas. Propane is colorless and odorless; an odorant is added to allow its detection.

Home Heating Oil

Home heating oil customers are served from 35 branch/depot locations in the Northeast and Mid-Atlantic regions, from which the heating oil segment delivers heating oil and other petroleum products and installs and repairs heating equipment 24 hours a day, seven days a week, 52 weeks a year, generally within four hours of request. These services are an integral part of its basic heating oil business, and are designed to maximize customer satisfaction and loyalty. In 2003, the heating oil segment’s sales were derived of approximately 76% from sales of home heating oil; 15% from the installation and repair of heating and air conditioning equipment; and 9% from the sale of other petroleum products, including diesel fuel and gasoline, to commercial customers. In fiscal 2003, sales to residential customers represented 83% of the retail heating oil gallons sold and 91% of heating oil gross profits.

Heating oil can be used for residential and commercial heating purposes, and it is the predominant source of fuel used to heat business and residences in the New England and Mid Atlantic states. According to the U.S. Department of Energy - Energy Information Administration, 2001 Residential Energy Consumption Survey, these regions account for approximately 77% of the households in the United States where heating oil is the main space-heating fuel. Approximately 31% of the homes in the region use heating oil as its main space-heating fuel. In recent years, demand for home heating oil has been affected by conservation efforts and conversions to natural gas. In addition, as the number of new homes that use oil heat has not been significant, there has been virtually no increase in the customer base due to housing starts.

4

Table of Contents

Natural Gas and Electricity

The Partnership is an independent reseller of natural gas and electricity to households and small commercial customers in deregulated markets. In the markets in which TG&E operates, natural gas and electricity are available from wholesalers. Substantially all of TG&E’s natural gas purchases were from major wholesalers in fiscal 2003. Natural gas is transported to the local utility, through purchased or assigned capacity on pipelines. In fiscal 2003, all of TG&E’s electricity requirements were purchased at market from the New York Independent System Operator which delivers the electricity to the local utility company. The utility then delivers the gas and electricity to TG&E customers using their distribution system. The utility and TG&E coordinate delivery and billing, and also compete to sell natural gas and electricity to the ultimate consumer. Generally, TG&E pays the local utility a charge to provide certain customer related services like billing. Customers pay a separate delivery charge to the utility for bringing the natural gas or electricity from the customer’s chosen supplier. In the case of all but three of the utilities where TG&E currently sells energy, TG&E and the local utility charges are itemized on one customer energy bill generated by the utility. For the remaining utilities, TG&E bills its customers directly.

Industry Characteristics

The retail propane and home heating oil industries are both mature, with total demand expected to remain relatively flat or to decline slightly. The Partnership believes that these industries are relatively stable and predictable due to the largely non-discretionary nature of propane and home heating oil use. Accordingly, the demand for propane and home heating oil has historically been relatively unaffected by general economic conditions but has been a function of weather conditions. It is common practice in both the propane and home heating oil distribution industries to price products to customers based on a per gallon margin over wholesale costs. As a result, distributors generally seek to maintain their margins by passing wholesale costs through to customers, thus insulating themselves from the volatility in wholesale heating oil and propane prices. However, during periods of sharp price fluctuations in supply costs, distributors may be unable or unwilling to pass entire product cost increases or decreases through to customers. In these cases, significant increases or decreases in per gallon margins may result. In addition, the timing of cost pass-throughs can significantly affect margins. The propane and home heating oil distribution industries are highly fragmented, characterized by a large number of relatively small, independently owned and operated local distributors. Each year a significant number of these local distributors have sought to sell their business for reasons that include retirement and estate planning. In addition, the propane and heating oil distribution industries are becoming more complex due to increasing environmental regulations and escalating capital requirements needed to acquire advanced, customer oriented technologies. Primarily as a result of these factors, both industries are undergoing consolidation, and the propane segment and the heating oil segment have been active consolidators in each of their markets.

In regard to the Partnership’s natural gas and electricity reselling segment, historically the local utility provided its customers with all three aspects of electric and natural gas service: generation or production, transmission and distribution of natural gas and electricity. However, under deregulation, state Public Utility Commissions throughout the country are licensing energy service companies (“ESCOs”), such as TG&E, to be approved as alternative suppliers of the commodity portion to end-users. ESCOs will provide the “generation” function, supplying electricity to specific delivery points. ESCOs are essentially the “producers” of the electricity. ESCOs also act as natural gas distributors, as they bring natural gas to the local utility for redistribution on the utility system to the ultimate end-user, the customer. The local utility companies will continue to provide the “distribution” function, acting as the distributor of the electricity and natural gas. Restructuring (commonly called deregulation) means that consumers now have the option to select a new provider for the commodity portion of their bill - a new supplier of electricity or natural gas. ESCOs are often able to supply electricity or natural gas to end users at discounts when compared to what is paid to the current local utility.

Business Strategy

The Partnership’s primary objective is to increase cash flow on a per unit basis. The Partnership pursues this objective principally through (i) the pursuit of strategic acquisitions which capitalize on the Partnership’s acquisition expertise in the highly fragmented propane and home heating oil distribution industries, (ii) the realization of operating efficiencies in existing and acquired operations, (iii) a focus on retention and potential customer growth, (iv) the continued enhancement in public awareness of the Partnership’s quality brands and (v) the sale of rationally related products.

As a leading retail distributor of propane and heating oil in the United States, the Partnership is able to realize economies of scale in operating, marketing, information technology and other areas by spreading costs over a larger customer base. Additionally, the heating oil segment is using communication and computer technology that is generally not used by its competitors, hopefully will allow it to realize operating efficiencies.

Recent Acquisitions

In fiscal 2003, the Partnership completed the purchase of three retail heating oil dealers for $35.9 million and seven retail propane dealers for $48.5 million.

5

Table of Contents

Propane Segment

Operations

Retail propane operations are located in the following states:

In addition to selling propane, the segment also sells and installs propane equipment, including heating and cooking appliances. Several locations sell bottled water and sell or lease water conditioning equipment. Typical branch locations consist of an office, an appliance showroom and a warehouse and service facility, with one or more 12,000 to 30,000 gallon bulk storage tanks. Satellite facilities typically contain only storage tanks. The distribution of propane at the retail level for the most part involves large numbers of small deliveries averaging 100 to 150 gallons to each customer. Retail deliveries of propane are usually made to customers by means of the propane segment’s fleet of bobtail and rack trucks.

Currently the propane segment has 704 bobtail and rack trucks. Propane is pumped from a bobtail truck, which generally holds 2,000 to 3,000 gallons, into a storage tank at the customer’s premises. The capacity of these tanks ranges from approximately 24 gallons to approximately 1,000 gallons. The propane segment also delivers propane to retail customers in portable cylinders, which typically are picked up and replenished at distribution locations, then returned to the retail customer. To a limited extent, the propane segment also delivers propane to certain end-users of propane in larger trucks known as transports. These trucks have an average capacity of approximately 9,000 gallons. End-users receiving transport deliveries include industrial customers, large-scale heating accounts, such as local gas utilities that use propane as a supplemental fuel to meet peak demand requirements, and large agricultural accounts that use propane for crop drying and space heating.

6

Table of Contents

Customers

During the last fiscal year, the propane segment’s residential volume, excluding the impact of volume obtained through acquisitions, decreased 2.5% due to what the Partnership believes was a combination of attrition and consumer conservation. However, the propane segment has continued to grow through acquisitions and it completed seven acquisitions with approximately 55,000 customers and total annual volumes of 56 million gallons during fiscal 2003. Approximately 72% of the propane segment’s retail sales are made to residential customers and 28% of retail sales are made to commercial and agricultural customers. Sales to residential customers in 2003 accounted for approximately 77% of propane gross profit on propane sales, reflecting the higher-margins of this segment of the market. In excess of 95% of the residential propane customers lease their tanks from the propane segment. In most states, due to fire safety regulations, a leased tank may only be refilled by the propane distributor that owns that tank. The inconvenience associated with switching tanks greatly reduces a propane customer’s tendency to change distributors. Over half of the propane segment’s residential customers receive their propane supply under an automatic delivery system. The amount delivered is based on weather and historical consumption patterns. Thus, the automatic delivery system eliminates the customer’s need to make an affirmative purchase decision. The propane segment provides emergency service 24 hours a day, seven days a week, 52 weeks a year.

Competition

The propane industry is highly competitive; however, long-standing customer relationships are typical of the retail propane industry. The ability to compete effectively within the propane industry depends on the reliability of service, responsiveness to customers and the ability to maintain competitive prices. The propane segment believes that its superior service capabilities and customer responsiveness differentiates it from many of its competitors. Branch operations offer emergency service 24 hours a day, seven days a week, 52 weeks a year. Competition in the propane industry is highly fragmented and generally occurs on a local basis with other large full-service multi-state propane marketers, smaller local independent marketers and farm cooperatives. According to LP Gas Magazine – February 2002, the ten largest multi-state marketers, including the Partnership’s propane segment, account for approximately 37% of the total retail sales of propane in the United States, and no single marketer has a greater than 10% share of the total retail market in the United States. Most of the propane segment’s branches compete with five or more marketers or distributors. The principal factors influencing competition among propane marketers are price and service. Each branch operates in its own competitive environment. While retail marketers locate in close proximity to customers to lower the cost of providing delivery and service, the typical retail distribution outlet has an effective marketing radius of approximately 35 miles.

In addition, propane competes primarily with electricity, natural gas and fuel oil as an energy source on the basis of price, availability and portability. In certain parts of the country, propane is generally less expensive to use than electricity for space heating, water heating, clothes drying and cooking. Propane is generally more expensive than natural gas, but serves as an alternative to natural gas in rural and suburban areas where natural gas is unavailable or portability of product is required. The expansion of natural gas into traditional propane markets has historically been inhibited by the capital costs required to expand distribution and pipeline systems. Although the extension of natural gas pipelines tends to displace propane distribution in the areas affected, the Partnership believes that new opportunities for propane sales arise as more geographically remote areas are developed. Although propane is similar to fuel oil in space heating and water heating applications, as well as in market demand and price, propane and fuel oil have generally developed their own distinct geographic markets. Because furnaces that burn propane will not operate on fuel oil, a conversion from one fuel to the other requires the installation of new equipment.

7

Table of Contents

Home Heating Oil Segment

Operations

The Partnership’s heating oil segment serves over 535,000 customers in the Northeast and Mid-Atlantic states. In addition to selling home heating oil, the heating oil segment installs and repairs heating and air conditioning equipment. To a limited extent, it also markets other petroleum products. During the twelve months ended September 30, 2003, the total sales in the heating oil segment were comprised of approximately 76% from sales of home heating oil; 15% from the installation and repair of heating equipment; and 9% from the sale of other petroleum products. The heating oil segment provides home heating equipment repair service 24 hours a day, seven days a week, 52 weeks a year, generally within four hours of a request. It also regularly provides various service incentives to obtain and retain customers. The heating oil segment is consolidating its operations under two brand names, which it is building by employing an upgraded sales force, together with a professionally developed marketing campaign, including radio and print advertising media. The heating oil segment has a nationwide toll free telephone number, 1-800-OIL-HEAT, which it believes helps build customer awareness and brand identity.

The heating oil segment is seeking to take advantage of its large size and to utilize modern technology to increase the efficiency and quality of services provided to its customers. The segment is seeking to create a more customer oriented service approach to significantly differentiate itself from its competitors. A core business process redesign project began in fiscal 2002 with an exhaustive effort to identify customer expectations and document existing business processes. These findings led to a conclusion that improved processes, consolidation of operations, technology investments and selective outsourcing could have a meaningful impact on improving customer services while reducing annual operating costs.

The Partnership believes technology can improve the efficiency and quality of services provided to its heating oil customers. The heating oil segment has now deployed second generation hand-held devices for the automation of its service workforce. These wireless hand held data terminals allow service and installation professionals on demand access to customer repair history, data to provide instant part and repair quotations, and the ability to invoice at the completion of service.

Consolidation of certain heating oil operational activities have been undertaken to create operating efficiencies and cost savings. Service technicians are being dispatched from two consolidated locations rather than 27 local offices. Oil delivery is now being managed from 11 regional locations rather than 27 local offices. The organization continues to adjust to these significant operational changes.

A transition to outsourcing in the area of customer relationship management has been undertaken as both a customer satisfaction and a cost reduction strategy. The Partnership believes outsourcing customer inquiries can improve performance and leverage the technology to eliminate system redundancy available from third party service organizations. In addition, an outsourcing partner has greater flexibility to manage extreme seasonal volume. Significant challenges remain with this dramatic transition. The complexity of customer interactions combined with the Partnership’s goal for service excellence has led to protracted training efforts. The heating oil segment has begun introducing call based technology enhancements including capabilities for customer inquiries via automated interactive telephone response and the web. While the physical transition is largely complete, the Partnership anticipates that supplementary training and support will be required through the 2003 - 2004 heating season.

The heating oil segment operates and markets in the following states:

8

Table of Contents

Customers

During the twelve months ended September 30, 2003, approximately 86% of the heating oil segment’s heating oil sales were made to homeowners, with the remainder to industrial, commercial and institutional customers. Over the last three fiscal years, the heating oil segment experienced average annual attrition of 1.3%, excluding the impact of acquisitions. Customer losses are the result of various factors, including customer relocation, price, natural gas conversions and credit problems. Customer gains are a result of marketing and service programs. While the heating oil segment often loses customers when they move from their homes, it is able to retain a majority of these homes by obtaining the purchaser as a customer. Approximately 90% of the heating oil customers receive their home heating oil under an automatic delivery system without the customer having to make an affirmative purchase decision. These deliveries are scheduled by computer, based upon each customer’s historical consumption patterns and prevailing weather conditions. The heating oil segment delivers home heating oil approximately six times during the year to the average customer. The segment’s practice is to bill customers promptly after delivery. Approximately 34% of its customers are on a budget payment plan, whereby their estimated annual oil purchases and service contract are paid for in a series of equal monthly payments over a twelve month period.

On September 30, 2003, approximately 40% of the heating oil customers had agreements establishing a fixed or maximum price per gallon over a twelve month period, as compared to 17% on September 30, 2002. This percentage could increase or decrease during fiscal 2004 based upon market conditions. The fixed or maximum price at which home heating oil is sold to these price plan customers is generally renegotiated based on current market conditions at the beginning of each heating season. The segment currently enters into derivative instruments (futures, options, collars and swaps) covering a substantial majority of the heating oil it expects to sell to these price plan customers in advance and at a fixed cost. Should events occur after a price plan customer’s price is established that increases the cost of home heating oil above the amount anticipated, margins for the price plan customers whose heating oil was not purchased in advance would be lower than expected, while those customers whose heating oil was purchased in advance would be unaffected. Conversely, should events occur during this period that decrease the cost of heating oil below the amount anticipated, margins for the price plan customers whose heating oil was purchased in advance could be lower than expected, while those customers whose heating oil was not purchased in advance would be unaffected or higher than expected.

Competition

The heating oil segment competes with distributors offering a broad range of services and prices, from full service distributors, like itself, to those offering delivery only. Long-standing customer relationships are typical in the industry. Like most companies in the home heating oil business, the heating oil segment provides home heating equipment repair service on a 24-hour a day basis. This tends to build customer loyalty. As a result of these factors, it is difficult for the heating oil segment to acquire new retail customers, other than through acquisitions. In some instances homeowners have formed buying cooperatives that seek to purchase fuel oil from distributors at a price lower than individual customers are otherwise able to obtain. The heating oil segment also competes for retail customers with suppliers of alternative energy products, principally natural gas, propane, and electricity. The rate of conversion from the use of home heating oil to natural gas is primarily affected by the relative prices of the two products and the cost of replacing an oil fired heating system with one that uses natural gas. The heating oil segment believes that approximately 1% of its home heating oil customer base annually converts from home heating oil to natural gas.

9

Table of Contents

Natural Gas and Electricity

Operations

The Partnership’s natural gas and electricity segment serves over 64,000 residential customers in four states. In fiscal 2003, the sales were comprised of 85% from sales of approximately 89.0 million therms of natural gas and 15% from sales of approximately 135 million kilowatts of electricity.

The business strategy of TG&E is to expand its market share by concentrating on obtaining new natural gas customers in areas where it believes they will be profitable and stable.

Customers

TG&E currently sells energy in the following utility areas:

At September 30, 2003, approximately 95% of TG&E’s customers were residential households, and the remaining 5% were industrial and commercial customers. New accounts are obtained through the utilization of third party telemarketing firms on a commission basis. Approximately 45% of TG&E’s customers are on a budget plan, whereby their estimated purchases are paid for in a series of equal monthly payments over a twelve month period.

Competition

TG&E’s primary competition is with local utility companies. In most markets, however, the utility is indifferent as to whether a customer buys from an independent reseller in that the utility tariff structure is commodity neutral. The utility makes its money by transporting the commodity and not from the sale of the commodity. Other competitors fall into two distinct categories; national or local marketing companies. National marketing companies are generally pipeline, producer or utility subsidiaries. These companies have mainly focused their attention on large commercial and industrial customers. Local companies typically only service one or two utility markets.

10

Table of Contents

Suppliers and Supply Arrangements

Propane Segment

The propane segment obtains propane from over 30 sources, all of which are domestic or Canadian companies, including BP Canada Energy Marketing Corp., Dawson Oil Company LTD., Duke Energy NGL Services, LP, Dynegy Inc., Enterprise Products Partners, Kinetic Resources, U.S.A., Marathon Oil Company, Markwest Hydrocarbons, Transammonia Inc. and Vanguard Petroleum Corporation. Supplies from these sources have traditionally been readily available, although there is no assurance that supplies of propane will continue to be readily available.

The majority of the propane supply is purchased under annual or longer term supply contracts that generally provide for pricing in accordance with market prices at the time of delivery. Some of the contracts provide for minimum and maximum amounts of propane to be purchased. The product supplied for the contracts come from refineries, gas processing plants and bulk purchases at the Mont Belvieu trading and storage complex. The bulk purchases at Mont Belvieu are physically moved through the TEPPCO Partners, L.P. pipeline system, to both the Seymour underground storage facility, which the Partnership owns and leases to TEPPCO Partners, L.P. in southern Indiana, and north into the Pennsylvania and New York area to supplement purchases made by the segment in the Northeast area. This lease agreement provides the propane segment the ability to store at all times throughout the terms of this agreement 21 million gallons of product storage or approximately 8% of the propane segments annual supply requirements, along the TEPPCO Partners, L.P. pipeline system. The Seymour facility is located on the TEPPCO Partners, L.P. pipeline system. The pipeline is connected to the Mont Belvieu, Texas storage facilities and is one of the largest conduits of supply for the U.S. propane industry. The Partnership believes that its diversification of suppliers will enable it to purchase all of its supply needs at market prices if supplies are interrupted from any of these sources without a material disruption of its operations. The Partnership also believes that relations with its current suppliers are satisfactory.

The financial hedging instruments of Star Gas Propane are limited to major companies such as Kinetics Resources USA and Morgan Stanley Capital Group Inc. The propane segment is able to effectively hedge, when required, without incurring significant basis risk since the majority of the contracted price of product and the financial instruments the propane segment uses are tied to the Mont Belvieu index.

Heating Oil Segment

The heating oil segment obtains fuel oil in either barge, pipeline, or truckload quantities, and has contracts with over 80 terminals for the right to temporarily store heating oil at facilities it does not own. Purchases are made under supply contracts or on the spot market. The home heating oil segment has market price based contracts for a majority of its petroleum requirements with 12 different suppliers, the majority of which have significant domestic sources for their product, and many of which have been suppliers for over 10 years. The segment’s current suppliers are: Amerada Hess Corporation, BP North America Petroleum Corp., Cargill Inc. Petroleum Trading, Citgo Petroleum Corp., Exxon / Mobil Oil Corporation, George E. Warren Corp., Global Companies, LLC, Mieco, Inc., Morgan Stanley Capital Group, Inc., Northville Industries, Sprague Energy and Sun Oil Company. Supply contracts typically have terms of 12 months. All of the supply contracts provide for maximum and in some cases minimum quantities. In most cases the supply contracts do not establish in advance the price of fuel oil. This price, like the price to most of its home heating oil customers, is based upon market prices at the time of delivery. The Partnership believes that its policy of contracting for substantially all of its supply needs with diverse and reliable sources will enable it to obtain sufficient product should unforeseen shortages develop in worldwide supplies. The Partnership also believes that relations with its current suppliers are satisfactory.

Natural Gas and Electricity Reseller Segment

The TG&E segment purchases natural gas at either the well-head, the pipeline pooling point or delivered to the city gate. Purchases are at market based pricing. The segment’s current natural gas supplier is Sempra Energy Trading Corp. All of the segment’s electricity requirements are currently purchased at market from New York Independent System Operator.

11

Table of Contents

Employees

As of September 30, 2003, the propane segment had 1,209 full-time employees, of whom 56 were employed by the corporate office and 1,153 were located in branch offices. Of these 1,153 branch employees, 439 were managerial and administrative; 489 were engaged in transportation and storage and 225 were engaged in field servicing. Approximately 137 of the segment’s employees are represented by seven different local chapters of labor unions. Management believes that its relations with both its union and non-union employees are satisfactory.

As of September 30, 2003, the home heating oil segment had 3,127 employees, of whom 833 were office, clerical and customer service personnel; 1,146 were heating equipment repairmen; 439 were oil truck drivers and mechanics; 369 were management and staff and 340 were employed in sales. In addition, approximately 419 seasonal employees are rehired annually to support the requirements of the heating season. Included within the heating oil segment’s employees are approximately 955 employees, that are represented by 17 different local chapters of labor unions. Management believes that its relations with both its union and non-union employees are satisfactory.

As of September 30, 2003, the TG&E segment had 24 employees, of whom 14 were office, clerical and customer service personnel and 10 were management. Management believes that its relations with its employees is satisfactory.

Government Regulations

The Partnership is subject to various federal, state and local environmental, health and safety laws and regulations. Generally, these laws impose limitations on the discharge of pollutants and establish standards for the handling of solid and hazardous wastes. These laws include the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (“CERCLA”), the Clean Air Act, the Occupational Safety and Health Act, the Emergency Planning and Community Right to Know Act, the Clean Water Act and comparable state statutes. CERCLA, also known as the “Superfund” law, imposes joint and several liabilities without regard to fault or the legality of the original conduct on certain classes of persons that are considered to have contributed to the release or threatened release of a hazardous substance into the environment. Heating oils and certain automotive waste products generated by the Partnership’s fleet are hazardous substances within the meaning of CERCLA. These laws and regulations could result in civil or criminal penalties in cases of non-compliance or impose liability for remediation costs. The heating oil segment is currently a named “potentially responsible party” in two CERCLA civil enforcement actions. Star Gas has agreed to de minimus settlements in one of the two actions for approximately $0.1 million. The remaining action is in its early stages of litigation with preliminary discovery activities taking place. The Partnership believes that both of these actions will have no material impact on its financial condition or results of operations. Propane is not considered a hazardous substance within the meaning of CERCLA.

National Fire Protection Association Pamphlets No. 54 and 58, which establish rules and procedures governing the safe handling of propane, or comparable regulations, have been adopted as the industry standard in all of the states in which the Partnership operates. In some states these laws are administered by state agencies, and in others they are administered on a municipal level. With respect to the transportation of heating oils, gasoline and propane by truck, the Partnership is subject to regulations promulgated under the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Act. These regulations cover the transportation of hazardous materials and are administered by the United States Department of Transportation. The Partnership conducts ongoing training programs to help ensure that its operations are in compliance with applicable regulations. The Partnership maintains various permits that are necessary to operate some of its facilities, some of which may be material to its operations. The Partnership believes that the procedures currently in effect at all of its facilities for the handling, storage and distribution of propane are consistent with industry standards and are in compliance in all material respects with applicable laws and regulations.

For acquisitions that involve the purchase or leasing of real estate, the Partnership conducts a due diligence investigation to attempt to determine whether any regulated substance has been sold from or stored on, any of that real estate prior to its purchase. This due diligence includes questioning the seller, obtaining representations and warranties concerning the seller’s compliance with environmental laws and performing site assessments. During this due diligence the Partnership’s employees, and, in certain cases, independent environmental consulting firms review historical records and databases and conduct physical investigations of the property to look for evidence of hazardous substances, compliance violations and the existence of underground storage tanks.

12

Table of Contents

Future developments, such as stricter environmental, health or safety laws and regulations thereunder, could affect Partnership operations. It is not anticipated that the Partnership’s compliance with or liabilities under environmental, health and safety laws and regulations, including CERCLA, will have a material adverse effect on the Partnership. To the extent that there are any environmental liabilities unknown to the Partnership or environmental, health or safety laws or regulations are made more stringent, there can be no assurance that the Partnership’s results of operations will not be materially and adversely affected.

Total Gas & Electric is an authorized supplier of electric and/or gas in the states of New York, New Jersey, Maryland and Florida, which allow consumers to choose their electric and/or gas supplier. TG&E is either licensed and/or registered to serve as a supplier in each state. The incumbent utility continues to serve as the local distribution company, which delivers the commodity, and in most cases continues to send customers their monthly invoices for the energy delivered. However, TG&E offers an alternative to the commodity portion of the consumers bill. As an alternative supplier, TG&E is subject to oversight by state public utility commissions, including licensing or registration requirements, information regarding rates and conditions of service, and in some instances annual filing requirements regarding numbers of customers, numbers of complaints, energy portfolio components, and other information relative to the company’s conduct of operations. Total Gas & Electric has adopted a comprehensive sales compliance program to comply with applicable regulations.

13

Table of Contents

ITEM 2. PROPERTIES

Propane Segment

As of September 30, 2003, the propane segment owned 98 of its 123 branch locations and 92 of its 126 satellite storage facilities and leased the balance. In addition, it owns a facility in Seymour Indiana, in which it stores propane for itself and third parties. The propane segment leases its corporate headquarters in Stamford, Connecticut.

The transportation of propane requires specialized trucks which carry specialized steel tanks that maintain the propane in a liquefied state. As of September 30, 2003, Star Gas Propane had a fleet of 9 tractors, 35 transport trailers, 704 bobtail and rack trucks and 572 other service and pick-up trucks, the majority of which are owned.

As of September 30, 2003, the propane segment owned or leased 385 bulk storage tanks with typical capacities of 12,000 to 30,000 gallons the majority of which are owned; approximately 365,000 stationary customer storage tanks with typical capacities of 24 to 1,000 gallons; and 40,000 portable propane cylinders with typical capacities of 5 to 24 gallons. The propane segment’s obligations under its borrowings are secured by liens and mortgages on all of its real and personal property.

Heating Oil Segment

The heating oil segment provides services to its customers from 35 branches/depots and 38 satellites, 30 of which are owned and 43 of which are leased, in 32 marketing areas in the Northeast and Mid-Atlantic Regions of the United States. The heating oil segment leases its corporate headquarters in Stamford, Connecticut. As of September 30, 2003, the heating oil segment had a fleet of 1,737 truck and transport vehicles the majority of which are owned and 843 services vans the majority of which are leased. The heating oil segment’s obligations under its borrowings are secured by liens and mortgages on most of its real and personal property.

TG&E Segment

The natural gas and electric reseller segment provides services to its customers from its Matawan, New Jersey corporate headquarters which is leased. This segment does not have any vehicles.

The Partnership believes its existing facilities are maintained in good condition and are suitable and adequate for its present needs. In addition, there are numerous comparable facilities available at similar rentals in each of its marketing areas should they be required.

ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS - LITIGATION

Litigation

The Partnership’s operations are subject to all operating hazards and risks normally incidental to handling, storing and transporting and otherwise providing for use by consumers of combustible liquids such as propane and home heating oil. As a result, at any given time the Partnership is a defendant in various legal proceedings and litigation arising in the ordinary course of business. The Partnership maintains insurance policies with insurers in amounts and with coverages and deductibles as the general partner believes are reasonable and prudent. However, the Partnership cannot assure that this insurance will be adequate to protect it from all material expenses related to potential future claims for personal and property damage or that these levels of insurance will be available in the future at economical prices. In addition, the occurrence of an explosion may have an adverse effect on the public’s desire to use the Partnership’s products. In the opinion of management, the Partnership is not a party to any litigation, which individually or in the aggregate could reasonably be expected to have a material adverse effect on the Partnership’s results of operations, financial position or liquidity.

14

Table of Contents

ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS

The Partnership held a special meeting of the holders of its common units, senior subordinated units and junior subordinated units on July 25, 2003. The following matters were voted on and approved at the special meeting and received the votes set forth below, in each case representing a majority of the votes eligible to be cast:

Common Units (not held by the General Partner or its affiliates):

Senior Subordinated Units and Junior Subordinated Units (not held by the General Partner or its affiliates):

Common Units (not held by the General Partner or affiliates):

Senior Subordinated Units and Junior Subordinated Units (not held by the General Partner or its affiliates):

Common Units (not held by the General Partner or its affiliates):

Senior Subordinated Units and Junior Subordinated Units (not held by the General Partner or its affiliates):

15

Table of Contents

PART II

ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S UNITS AND RELATED MATTERS

The common units, representing common limited partner interests in the Partnership, are listed and traded on the New York Stock Exchange, Inc. (“NYSE”) under the symbol “SGU”. The common units began trading on the NYSE on May 29, 1998. Previously, the common units had traded on the NASDAQ National Market under the symbol “SGASZ.”

The Partnership’s senior subordinated units began trading on the NYSE on March 29, 1999 under the symbol “SGH.” The Senior Subordinated Units became eligible to receive distributions in February 2000, and the first distribution was made in August 2000. The following tables set forth the high and low closing price ranges for the common and senior subordinated units and the cash distribution declared on each unit for the fiscal 2002 and 2003 quarters indicated.

As of September 30, 2003, there were approximately 887 holders of record of common units, and approximately 124 holders of record of senior subordinated units.

There is no established public trading market for the Partnership’s 345,364 Junior Subordinated Units and 325,729 general partner units, and 100 common shares of Star Gas Finance Company.

In general, the Partnership distributes to its partners on a quarterly basis, all of its Available Cash in the manner described below. Available Cash is defined for any of the Partnership’s fiscal quarters, as all cash on hand at the end of that quarter, less the amount of cash reserves that are necessary or appropriate in the reasonable discretion of the general partner to (i) provide for the proper conduct of the business; (ii) comply with applicable law, any of its debt instruments or other agreements; or (iii) provide funds for distributions to the common unitholders and the senior subordinated unitholders during the next four quarters, in some circumstances.

The general partner may not establish cash reserves for distributions to the senior subordinated units unless the general partner has determined that the establishment of reserves will not prevent it from distributing the minimum quarterly distribution on any common unit arrearages and for the next four quarters. The full definition of Available Cash is set forth in the Agreement of Limited Partnership of the Partnership. The information concerning restrictions on distributions required in this section is incorporated herein by reference to the Partnership’s Consolidated Financial Statements, which begin on page F-1 of this Form 10-K.

16

Table of Contents

ITEM 6. SELECTED HISTORICAL FINANCIAL AND OPERATING DATA

The following table sets forth selected historical and other data of the Partnership and should be read in conjunction with the more detailed financial statements included elsewhere in this report. See Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

The Selected Financial Data is derived from the financial information of the Partnership and should be read in conjunction therewith.

17

Table of Contents

ITEM 6. SELECTED HISTORICAL FINANCIAL AND OPERATING DATA (Continued)

18

Table of Contents

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF

FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Disclosure

This Report includes “forward-looking statements” which represent the Partnership’s expectations or beliefs concerning future events that involve risks and uncertainties, including those associated with the effect of weather conditions on the Partnership’s financial performance, the price and supply of home heating oil, propane, natural gas and electricity, the ability of the Partnership to obtain new accounts and retain existing accounts and the realization of savings from the business process redesign. All statements other than statements of historical facts included in this Report including, without limitation, the statements under “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and “Business” and elsewhere herein, are forward-looking statements. Although the Partnership believes that the expectations reflected in such forward-looking statements are reasonable, it can give no assurance that such expectations will prove to have been correct. Important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from the Partnership’s expectations (“Cautionary Statements”) are disclosed in this Report, including without limitation and in conjunction with the forward-looking statements included in this Report. All subsequent written and oral forward-looking statements attributable to the Partnership or persons acting on its behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety by the Cautionary Statements.

Overview

In analyzing the financial results of the Partnership, the following matters should be considered.

The primary use of heating oil, propane and natural gas is for space heating in residential and commercial applications. As a result, weather conditions have a significant impact on financial performance and should be considered when analyzing changes in financial performance. In addition, gross margins vary according to customer mix. For example, sales to residential customers generate higher profit margins than sales to other customer groups, such as agricultural customers. Accordingly, a change in customer mix can affect gross margins without necessarily impacting total sales.

The following is a discussion of the historical condition and results of operations of Star Gas Partners, L.P. and its subsidiaries, and should be read in conjunction with the historical Financial and Operating Data and Notes thereto included elsewhere in this annual report on Form 10K.

19

Table of Contents

FISCAL YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2003

COMPARED TO FISCAL YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2002

Volume

For fiscal 2003, retail volume of home heating oil and propane increased 135.7 million gallons, or 22.7%, to 733.8 million gallons, as compared to 598.1 million gallons for fiscal 2002. This increase was due to a 109.3 million gallon increase in the heating oil segment and a 26.4 million gallon increase in the propane segment. The increase in volume primarily reflects the impact of significantly colder temperatures and the impact of an additional 21.2 million gallons provided by acquisitions. Customer attrition, largely in the home heating oil segment’s lower margin commercial business, partially offset these volume increases. The Partnership also believes that a planned shift in the delivery pattern at the heating oil segment, designed to increase efficiency, decreased volume for fiscal 2003 by an estimated 10.1 million gallons. Typical delivery patterns would have resulted in these gallons being delivered in fiscal 2003 but were actually delivered in the three months ended September 30, 2002. Temperatures in the Partnership’s areas of operations were an average of 29.8% colder than in the prior year’s comparable period and approximately 9.0% colder than normal as reported by the National Oceanic Atmospheric Administration (“NOAA”).

Sales

For fiscal 2003, sales increased $438.7 million, or 42.8%, to $1,463.7 million, as compared to $1,025.1 million for fiscal 2002. This increase was due to $312.6 million higher home heating oil sales, $83.8 million higher propane segment sales and a $42.3 million increase in TG&E sales. Sales increased largely due to the higher retail volume sold and as a result of higher selling prices. Selling prices increased versus the prior year’s comparable period in response to higher supply costs. Sales of rationally related products, including heating and air conditioning equipment installation and service and water softeners increased by $15.2 million in the heating oil segment and by $3.6 million in the propane segment from the prior year’s comparable period due to acquisitions, price increases and from colder temperatures.

Cost of Product

For fiscal 2003, cost of product increased $330.0 million, or 68.9%, to $809.2 million, as compared to $479.2 million for fiscal 2002. This increase was due to $230.1 million of higher cost of product at the home heating oil segment, $60.8 million higher cost of product at the propane segment and a $39.2 million increase in TG&E cost of product. Cost of product increased largely due to the higher retail volume sold and from higher supply cost. While selling prices and supply cost both increased on a per gallon basis, the increase in selling prices was equal to the increase in supply costs, which resulted in approximately the same per gallon margins.

Cost of Installations, Service and Appliances

For fiscal 2003, cost of installations, service and appliances increased $18.3 million, or 10.0%, to $201.2 million, as compared to $182.8 million for fiscal 2002. This increase was due to an additional $17.0 million in the heating oil segment and by $1.4 million in the propane segment from the prior year’s comparable period due to the increase in sales of these products and from additional cost of service expenses resulting from the colder temperatures.

Delivery and Branch Expenses

For fiscal 2003, delivery and branch expenses increased $57.8 million, or 24.5%, to $293.5 million, as compared to $235.7 million for fiscal 2002. This increase was due to an additional $43.2 million of delivery and branch expenses at the heating oil segment and a $14.6 million increase in delivery and branch expenses for the propane segment. The period to period comparison was impacted by the purchase of weather insurance that allowed the Partnership to record approximately $6.4 million of net weather insurance recoveries in the fiscal 2002 period versus a $3.6 million expense in the fiscal 2003 period for weather insurance premiums paid. The remaining increase in delivery and branch expenses of $47.8 million for fiscal 2003, was largely due to the additional operating cost associated with increased volumes delivered, higher marketing costs at the heating oil segment of $5.7 million, higher bad debt expense of $2.9 million at the heating oil segment, higher bad debt expense of $0.4 million at the propane segment and to the impact of operating expense and wage increases.

Depreciation and Amortization Expenses

For fiscal 2003, depreciation and amortization expenses decreased $5.9 million, or 10.0%, to $53.2 million, as compared to $59.0 million for fiscal 2002. During fiscal 2002, approximately $8.3 million of goodwill amortization was included in depreciation and amortization expense. As of October 1, 2002, goodwill is no longer amortized in accordance to SFAS No. 142. Depreciation and amortization expense related to acquisitions and fixed asset additions acquired after September 30, 2002, resulted in increases which partially offset the decrease attributable to goodwill amortization.

20

Table of Contents

General and Administrative Expenses

For fiscal 2003, general and administrative expenses increased $16.1 million, or 38.4%, to $58.1 million, as compared to $42.0 million for fiscal 2002. This increase was largely due to the inclusion of $7.4 million of incremental expense related to the business process redesign project in the heating oil segment, a $9.9 million increase in the accrual for compensation earned for unit appreciation rights and restricted stock awards previously granted and for other increases of $6.8 million, largely due to increased bonus compensation based upon results for fiscal 2003 ($1.9 million), higher legal and professional expenses at the Partnership level ($2.4 million) and for increased expenses at the propane segment ($2.0 million) for its increased size. The increase in legal and professional expenses at the Partnership level largely were incurred for Sarbanes compliance, acquisitions and financing related issues. The increase was partially offset by lower general and administrative expenses at TG&E of approximately $7.9 million, largely due to lower bad debt ($5.0 million) and collection expenses.

The heating oil segment continued to progress with its business reorganization project during fiscal 2003. The heating oil segment is seeking to take advantage of its large size to utilize technology to increase the efficiency and quality of services provided to its customers. The segment is seeking to create a more customer oriented service company to significantly differentiate itself from its competitive peers.

A core business process redesign project began in fiscal 2002 with an exhaustive effort to identify customer expectations and document existing business processes. These findings led to a conclusion that improved processes, consolidation of operations, technology investments and selective outsourcing would have a meaningful impact on improving customer services while reducing annual operating costs.

Consolidation of certain heating oil operational activities have been undertaken to create operating efficiencies and cost savings. Service technicians are being dispatched from two consolidated locations rather than 27 local offices. Oil delivery is now being managed from 11 regional locations rather than 27 local offices. The organization continues to adjust to these significant operational changes.

A transition to outsourcing in the area of customer relationship management has been undertaken as both a customer satisfaction and a cost reduction strategy. The Partnership believes outsourcing customer inquiries will improve performance and leverage technology to eliminate system redundancy available from third party service organizations. In addition, an outsourcing partner has greater flexibility to manage extreme seasonal volume. Significant challenges remain with this dramatic transition. The complexity of customer interactions combined with the Partnership’s goal for service excellence has led to protracted training efforts. The heating oil segment has begun introducing call based technology enhancements including capabilities for customer inquiries via automated interactive telephone response and the web. While the physical transition is largely complete, the Partnership anticipates that supplementary training and support will be required through the 2003 - 2004 heating season.

The $7.4 million incremental expense in fiscal 2003 ($9.4 million of actual fiscal 2003 expense) related to this redesign project largely consisted of consulting fees, employee termination benefits and separation cost and travel related expenditures. In connection with this plan, the Partnership reduced the size of its work force and recognized a liability of approximately $2.0 million related to certain employee termination benefits and separation costs.

By the completion of the program, total expenditures are estimated to be $28.1 million. Through September 30, 2003, total expenditures for the program were $26.5 million with the balance to be spent in fiscal 2004. It is anticipated that the program will improve operating income by approximately $15.0 million annually of which $8.4 million is expected to be realized in fiscal 2004, with the remainder in fiscal 2005 and fiscal 2006. While the Partnership believes that these levels of savings will be realized, there can be no assurance that these amounts will actually be forthcoming, or that other events will not offset the expected benefits.

Interest Expense

For fiscal 2003, interest expense increased $3.5 million, or 8.6%, to $44.4 million, as compared to $40.9 million for fiscal 2002. This increase was largely due to additional interest expense of $1.5 million for higher average outstanding working capital borrowings and due to additional interest related to the higher interest rate on the Partnership’s $200.0 million debt offering partially offset by interest expense related to the debt repaid with the offering.

Income Tax Expense

For fiscal 2003, income tax expense increased $3.0 million to $1.5 million, as compared to a tax benefit of $1.5 million for fiscal 2002. This increase was due to higher state income taxes based upon the higher pretax earnings achieved for fiscal 2003 and the absence in fiscal 2003 of the tax benefit from a federal tax loss carryback of $2.2 million recorded in fiscal 2002.

21

Table of Contents

Cumulative Effect of Change in Accounting Principle

For fiscal 2003, the Partnership recorded a $3.9 million decrease in net income arising from the adoption of SFAS No. 142 to reflect the impairment of its goodwill for its TG&E segment.

Net Income

For fiscal 2003, net income increased $11.4 million, or 101.9%, to $0.2 million, as compared to a loss of $11.2 million for fiscal 2002. The increase was due to a $17.1 million increase in net income at the heating oil segment, a $6.6 million increase in net income at the propane segment and by a $11.5 million decrease in the net loss at TG&E partially offset by a $23.8 million increase in the net loss at the Partnership level. The increase in net income was primarily due to the impact of colder weather and lower depreciation and amortization partially offset by the $3.9 million decrease in net income at the TG&E segment resulting from the adoption of SFAS No. 142.

FISCAL YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2002

COMPARED TO FISCAL YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2001

Volume

For fiscal 2002, retail volume of home heating oil and propane increased 33.9 million gallons, or 6.0%, to 598.1 million gallons, as compared to 564.2 million gallons for fiscal 2001. This increase was due to a 30.6 million gallon increase in the heating oil segment and a 3.3 million gallon increase in the propane segment. The increase in volume reflects the impact of an additional 135.4 million gallons provided by acquisitions, which was largely offset by the impact of significantly warmer temperatures and to a much lesser extent by customer attrition in the heating oil segment. The Partnership also believes that a shift in the delivery pattern at the heating oil segment increased volume in fiscal 2002 by an estimated 11.0 million gallons. Temperatures in the Partnership’s areas of operations were an average of 18.4% warmer than in the prior year’s comparable period and approximately 18% warmer than normal. The abnormally warm weather made the past heating season the warmest in over a hundred years with temperatures approximately 6% higher than the next warmest year in the century.

Sales

For fiscal 2002, sales decreased $60.9 million, or 5.6%, to approximately $1.0 billion, as compared to approximately $1.1 billion for fiscal 2001. This decrease was due to $30.8 million lower propane segment sales and $52.5 million lower TG&E sales partially offset by a $22.4 million increase in sales at the heating oil segment. Sales decreased largely as a result of lower selling prices which were only partially offset by sales from the higher retail volume in the heating oil and propane segments. Selling prices, in all segments, decreased versus the prior year’s comparable period in response to lower product commodity costs. Sales of rationally related products, including heating and air conditioning equipment installation and service and water softeners increased in the heating oil segment by $40.6 million and by $3.8 million in the propane segment from the prior year’s comparable period due to acquisitions. TG&E’s sales also decreased as a result of lower electricity sales from the segment’s strategic decision made during fiscal 2001 to redirect its resources toward the natural gas deregulated energy markets which TG&E believes offers greater potential for new opportunities and profitability.

Cost of Product

For fiscal 2002, cost of product decreased $149.0 million, or 23.7%, to $479.2 million, as compared to $628.2 million for fiscal 2001. This decrease was due to $55.2 million of lower cost of product at the heating oil segment, $43.1 million lower propane segment cost of product and a $50.7 million lower cost of product in TG&E. Cost of product decreased due to the impact of lower product commodity cost partially offset by the cost of product for the higher retail volume sales. TG&E cost of product also decreased due to the lower electricity sales. While selling prices and supply cost decreased on a per gallon basis, the decrease in selling prices was less than the decrease in supply costs, which resulted in an increase in per gallon margins.

Cost of Installations, Service and Appliances

For fiscal 2002, cost of installations, service and appliances increased $39.7 million or 27.7% to $182.8 million as compared to $143.1 million for fiscal 2001. This increase was due to an additional $37.9 million in the heating oil segment and by $1.8 million in the propane segment from the prior years comparable period due to the increase in sales of these products.

22

Table of Contents

Delivery and Branch Expenses

For fiscal 2002, delivery and branch expenses increased $35.6 million, or 17.8%, to $235.7 million, as compared to $200.1 million for fiscal 2001. This increase was due to an additional $31.1 million of delivery and branch expenses at the heating oil segment and a $4.6 million increase in delivery and branch expenses for the propane segment. Delivery and branch expenses increased both at the heating oil and propane segments largely due to additional operating costs associated with increased volumes delivered by acquired companies and due to the impact of price and wage increases. Due to the fixed component of the Partnership’s cost structure, the significant reduction in volume caused by the extremely warm weather conditions didn’t allow the Partnership to completely reduce operating expenses in direct proportion to the volume reduction. The heating oil segment’s delivery and branch expense also increased by approximately $2.8 million due to an increase in the estimate of the accrual required to cover certain insurance reserves. The increase in delivery and branch expenses was mitigated by the purchase of weather insurance that allowed the Partnership to record approximately $6.4 million of net weather insurance recoveries.

Depreciation and Amortization Expenses

For fiscal 2002, depreciation and amortization expenses increased $14.7 million, or 33.0%, to $59.0 million, as compared to $44.4 million for fiscal 2001. This increase was primarily due to additional depreciation and amortization on fixed assets and intangibles (other than goodwill) related to heating oil and propane acquisitions. Amortization expense would be approximately $3.4 million higher in fiscal 2002 if SFAS No. 141 was not implemented. See “Accounting Principles Not Yet Adopted” for a further discussion of the effects of SFAS No. 141.

General and Administrative Expenses

For fiscal 2002, general and administrative expenses increased $1.0 million, or 2.6%, to $42.0 million, as compared to $41.0 million for fiscal 2001. The increase was due to additional general and administration expenses for acquisitions of approximately $2.1 million, and for increased compensation expense of approximately $1.7 million for TG&E. The increase was partially offset by lower general and administrative expenses at the Partnership level of $5.0 million. The increased compensation for TG&E was incurred for professional staff additions, hiring of personnel for collection efforts and for severance paid to former employees in connection with the relocation of its corporate office to New Jersey. TG&E’s charge to bad debt expense was approximately $6 million in both periods. Based upon TG&E’s implementation of new information systems and more stringent credit policies, the Partnership believes that TG&E’s bad debt losses should approximate the experience of the Partnership’s other two operating segments going forward. General and administrative expenses were lower at the Partnership level due to a reduction in the accrual for compensation earned for unit appreciation rights previously granted as well as for a $2.9 million decrease in unit compensation expense. The decrease in unit compensation expense was due to a reduction in the accrual for units expected to be earned versus the prior year under the Partnership’s Unit Incentive Plan pursuant to which certain employees were granted senior subordinated units as an incentive for achieving specified objectives which were not achieved in fiscal 2002. The Partnership has determined that these contingent units will not vest for fiscal 2002.

General and administrative expenses also included approximately $2.0 million of incremental expense related to an on-going business process redesign project in the heating oil segment. The heating oil segment is seeking to take advantage of its large size and utilize modern technology to increase the efficiency and quality of services provided to its customers. The segment is seeking to create a more customer oriented service company to significantly differentiate itself from its competitive peers. A core business process redesign project began this past fiscal year with an exhaustive effort to identify customer expectations and document existing business processes. The customer remains the focal point for change, although significant improvement in operational efficiency is also a goal. While the critical analysis and redesign of existing business processes continues, the segment has already documented near term opportunities for productivity and cost improvement. Preliminary conclusions indicate that improved processes and related technology investments could have a meaningful impact on reducing the heating oil segment’s annual operating costs. The $2.0 million incremental expense in the 2002 fiscal year largely consisted of consulting fees and travel related expenditures. The expenses related to the on-going business process redesign project will continue into fiscal 2003.

23

Table of Contents

Interest Expense

For fiscal 2002, interest expense, increased $3.6 million, or 9.7%, to $40.9 million, as compared to $37.3 million for fiscal 2001. This increase was due to additional interest expense for the financing of propane and heating oil acquisitions partially offset by lower interest expense for working capital borrowings.

Income Tax Expense (benefit)

For fiscal 2002, income tax expense decreased $3.0 million, or 197.2%, to a tax benefit of $1.5 million, as compared to an expense of $1.5 million for fiscal 2001. This decrease was due to the availability of carrying back certain Federal tax losses resulting from a change in the tax laws enacted during fiscal year 2002 of approximately $2.2 million and due to lower state income taxes based upon the lower pretax earnings achieved for fiscal year 2002.

Cumulative Effect of Adoption of Accounting Principle

For fiscal 2001, the Partnership recorded a $1.5 million increase in net income arising from the adoption of SFAS No. 133.

Net Loss

For fiscal 2002, net loss increased $5.9 million, or 112.8%, to $11.2 million, as compared to $5.2 million for fiscal 2001. The increased net loss was due to a $9.7 million decrease in net income at the heating oil segment and a $3.0 million increase in the net loss at TG&E partially offset by a $0.3 million increase in net income at the propane segment and a $6.4 million reduction in the net loss at the Partnership level. The increase in the net loss was primarily due to decreased volume from the impact of the warmer weather, partially offset by a per gallon improvement in gross profit margins, net weather insurance recoveries, the tax benefit of the tax loss carryback and by net income generated from acquisitions.

24

Table of Contents

Liquidity and Capital Resources

The ability of Star Gas to satisfy its obligations will depend on its future performance, which will be subject to prevailing economic, financial, business, and weather conditions, and other factors, most of which are beyond its control. Capital requirements of Star Gas are expected to be provided by cash flows from operating activities and cash on hand at September 30, 2003. To the extent for fiscal 2004, capital requirements exceed cash flows from operating activities:

See also “Financing and Sources of Liquidity” below for a discussion of the Partnership’s outstanding debt amortization requirements.

Cash Flows

Operating Activities. Cash provided by operating activities for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2003 was $57.2 million as compared to cash provided by operating activities of $65.5 million for the fiscal year 2002. This decrease in cash provided by operating activities was largely due to an increase in operating assets and liabilities in fiscal 2003 from fiscal 2002, primarily due to a $27.6 million increase in accounts receivable largely due to the colder weather experienced in fiscal 2003. The net cash provided by operations of $57.2 million for fiscal 2003 consisted of net income of $0.2 million, adjusted for noncash charges of $70.8 million, primarily depreciation and amortization of $53.2 million, which were offset by an increase in operating assets and liabilities of $13.8 million largely due to an increase in receivables from the colder temperatures experienced in fiscal 2003.

Investing Activities. Star Gas completed ten acquisitions during fiscal 2003, investing $84.4 million. This expenditure for acquisitions is included in the cash used in investing activities of $101.2 million along with the $18.5 million invested for capital expenditures. The $18.5 million for capital expenditures is comprised of $7.1 million of capital additions needed to sustain operations at current levels and $11.4 million for capital expenditures incurred in connection with the heating oil segment’s business process redesign program and for customer tanks and other capital expenditures to support growth of operations. The capital expenditures made for the business process redesign program were largely for the purchase of modern technology to increase the efficiency and quality of services provided to its customers. Investing activities also includes proceeds from the sale of fixed assets of $1.7 million.

Financing Activities. During fiscal 2003, cash provided by financing activities, included $189.7 million of net proceeds from the Partnership’s $200 million 10.25% Senior Note offering in February 2003, $34.2 million from a common unit offering in August 2003 and $12.3 million from the net increase in acquisition borrowings. Cash distributions paid to Unitholders of $72.6 million, debt repayments of $155.5 million, decreased working capital borrowings of $14.2 million and other financing activities of $1.3 million resulted in net cash used in financing activities of $7.4 million.

As a result of the above activity, cash decreased by $51.4 million to $10.1 million as of September 30, 2003.

25

Table of Contents

Earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA)

For the fiscal year ended September 30, 2003, EBITDA increased $12.3 million, or 14.4% to $97.7 million as compared to $85.4 million for fiscal 2002. This increase was due to $13.8 million additional EBITDA generated by the heating oil segment, a $4.6 million additional EBITDA at the propane segment and a $7.2 million additional EBITDA at TG&E, partially offset by $13.3 million reduction in EBITDA at the Partnership level largely due to the increase in the accrual for compensation earned for unit appreciation rights and restricted stock awards previously granted. The increase in EBITDA was largely due to the impact of colder temperatures in our areas of operations as reported by NOAA. TG&E’s EBITDA was negatively impacted by the inclusion of a non-cash $3.9 million decrease in net income for the cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle arising from the adoption of SFAS No. 142 to reflect the impairment of its goodwill. EBITDA should not be considered as an alternative to net income (as an indicator of operating performance) or as an alternative to cash flow (as a measure of liquidity or ability to service debt obligations), but provides additional information for evaluating the Partnership’s ability to make the Minimum Quarterly Distribution. EBITDA is calculated for the fiscal years ended September 30 as follows:

Financing and Sources of Liquidity

The Partnership’s heating oil segment had a bank credit facility at September 30, 2003, which included a working capital facility, providing for up to $115.5 million of borrowings to be used for working capital purposes, an acquisition facility, providing for up to $50.0 million of borrowings to be used for acquisitions and for capital expenditures and a $27.5 million insurance letter of credit facility. The working capital facility and letter of credit facility were scheduled to expire on June 30, 2004. The acquisition facility was also scheduled to convert to a term loan for any outstanding borrowings on June 30, 2004, which balance will be payable in eight equal quarterly principal payments. At September 30, 2003, $6.0 million of working capital borrowings and $33.0 million of acquisition facility borrowings and $26.9 million of the insurance letters of credit were outstanding.

On December 22, 2003, the heating oil segment entered into a new credit agreement consisting of three facilities totaling $235.0 million having a maturity date of June 30, 2006. These facilities consist of a $150.0 million revolving credit facility, the proceeds of which are to be used for working capital purposes, a $35.0 million revolving credit facility, the proceeds of which are to be used for the issuance of standby letters of credit in connection with surety, worker’s compensation and other financial guarantees, and a $50.0 million revolving credit facility, the proceeds of which are to be used to finance or refinance certain acquisitions and capital expenditures, for the issuance of letters of credit in connection with acquisitions and, to the extent that there is insufficient availability under the working capital facility. These facilities will refinance and replace the existing credit agreements described in the preceding paragraph, which totaled $193.0 million.

The Partnership’s propane segment has a bank credit facility, which consists of a $25.0 million acquisition facility, a $25.0 million parity debt facility that can be used to fund maintenance and growth capital expenditures and a $24.0 million working capital facility. The working capital facility expires on September 30, 2006. Borrowings under the acquisition and parity debt facilities will revolve until September 30, 2006, after which time any outstanding loans thereunder, will amortize in quarterly principal payments with a final payment due on September 30, 2008. At September 30, 2003, $2.0 million of parity debt facility borrowings, $12.6 million of acquisition facility borrowings and $6.0 million of working capital borrowings were outstanding.

The Partnership’s bank credit facilities and debt agreements contain several financial tests and covenants restricting the various segments and Partnership’s ability to pay distributions, incur debt and engage in certain other business transactions. In general these tests are based upon achieving certain debt to cash flow ratios and cash flow to interest expense ratios. In addition, amounts borrowed under the working capital facilities are subject to a requirement to maintain a zero balance for at least forty-five consecutive days. Failure to comply with the various restrictive and affirmative covenants of the Partnership’s various bank and note facility agreements could negatively impact the Partnership’s ability to incur additional debt and/or pay distributions and could cause certain debt to become currently payable.

As of September 30, 2003, the Partnership was in compliance with all debt covenants.

26

Table of Contents

On February 6, 2003, the Partnership and its wholly owned subsidiary, Star Gas Finance Company, jointly issued $200.0 million face value Senior Notes due on February 15, 2013. These notes accrue interest at an annual rate of 10.25% and require semi-annual interest payments on February 15 and August 15 of each year commencing on August 15, 2003. These notes are redeemable at the option of the Partnership, in whole or in part, from time to time by payment of a premium as defined. These notes were priced at 98.466% for total gross proceeds of $196.9 million. The Partnership also incurred $7.2 million of fees and expenses in connection with the issuance of these notes resulting in net proceeds of $189.7 million. The Partnership used the proceeds to repay existing long-term debt and working capital facility borrowings in the amount of $169.0 million, $17.7 million for acquisitions and $3.0 million to finance capital expenditures.

The Partnership has $522.2 million of debt outstanding as of September 30, 2003 (amount does not include working capital borrowings of $12.0 million), with significant maturities occurring over the next five years. The following summarizes the Partnership’s long-term debt maturities during fiscal years ending September 30, exclusive of amounts that have been repaid through September 30, 2003:

The Partnership’s heating oil segment’s bank facilities allow for the refinancing of up to $20.0 million of existing senior debt and the Partnership’s propane segment’s bank facilities allow for the refinancing of up to $25.0 million of existing senior debt. The refinancing capabilities are subject to capacity and other restrictions. Funding for future year’s debt maturities other than what could be refinanced with bank facilities will largely be dependent upon new debt or equity issuances.

The Partnership continues to evaluate strategic alternatives for its TG&E business segment, including evaluating the possible sale of the business. An investment advisor, Bovaro Partners, LLC, has been hired to assist the Partnership in this endeavor. The Partnership has not made a decision to sell the TG&E business but is currently evaluating preliminary interest expressed by potential buyers as well as evaluating other alternatives for the business. A major consideration in the Partnership’s evaluation process is the significant improvement that TG&E demonstrated in fiscal 2003 in becoming a more profitable operation. The Partnership would not expect any potential sale to result in a significant gain or loss. In addition, the Partnership would also not expect that any potential sale would have a significant impact on liquidity on a going forward basis.

In general, the Partnership distributes to its partners on a quarterly basis, all of its Available Cash in the manner described in Note 3 (Quarterly Distribution of Available Cash) of the Consolidated Financial Statements. Available Cash is defined for any of the Partnership’s fiscal quarters, as all cash on hand at the end of that quarter, less the amount of cash reserves that are necessary or appropriate in the reasonable discretion of the general partner to (i) provide for the proper conduct of the business; (ii) comply with applicable law, any of its debt instruments or other agreements; or (iii) provide funds for distributions to the common unitholders and the senior subordinated unitholders during the next four quarters, in some circumstances.

The Partnership believes that the purchase of weather insurance could be an important element in the Partnership’s ability to maintain the stability of its cash flows. In August 2002, the Partnership purchased weather insurance that could have provided up to $20.0 million of coverage for the impact of warm weather on the Partnership’s operating results for the 2002 - 2003 heating season. No amounts were received under the policies during fiscal 2003 due to the colder than normal temperatures. In addition, the Partnership purchased a base of $12.5 million of weather insurance coverage for each year from 2004 – 2007 and purchased an additional $7.5 million of weather insurance coverage for fiscal 2004. The amount of insurance proceeds that could be realized under these policies is calculated by multiplying a fixed dollar amount by the degree day deviation from an agreed upon cumulative degree day strike price.

For fiscal 2004, the Partnership anticipates paying interest of approximately $44.8 million, and anticipates growth and maintenance capital additions of approximately $8.1 million. In addition, the Partnership plans to pay distributions on its units to the extent there is sufficient Available Cash in accordance with the partnership agreement. The Partnership plans to fund acquisitions made through a combination of debt and equity. Based on its current cash position, bank credit availability and anticipated net cash to be generated from operating activities, the Partnership expects to be able to meet all of its fiscal 2004 obligations.

27

Table of Contents

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles requires management to establish accounting policies and make estimates and assumptions that affect reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the Consolidated Financial Statements. Star Gas evaluates its policies and estimates on an on-going basis. The Partnership’s Consolidated Financial Statements may differ based upon different estimates and assumptions.

The Partnership’s significant accounting policies are discussed in Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. Star Gas believes the following are its critical accounting policies:

Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets

The FASB issued SFAS No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets” in June 2001. SFAS No. 142 requires that goodwill no longer be amortized, but instead be tested for impairment at least annually in accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 142. SFAS No. 142 also requires that intangible assets with definite useful lives, such as customer lists, continue to be amortized over their respective estimated useful lives.

The Partnership calculates amortization using the straight-line method over periods ranging from 5 to 15 years for intangible assets with definite useful lives. Star Gas uses amortization methods and determines asset values based on its best estimates using reasonable and supportable assumptions and projections. Star Gas assesses the useful lives of intangible assets based on the estimated period over which Star Gas will receive benefit from such intangible assets such as historical evidence regarding customer churn rate. In some cases, the estimated useful lives are based on contractual terms. At September 30, 2003, the Partnership had $201.8 million of net intangible assets subject to amortization. If circumstances required a change in estimated useful lives of the assets, it could have a material effect on results of operations. For example, if lives were shortened by one year, the Partnership estimates that amortization for these assets for fiscal 2003 would have increased by approximately $2.8 million.

SFAS No. 142 also requires the Partnership’s goodwill to be assessed annually for impairment. These assessments involve management’s estimates of future cash flows, market trends and other factors to determine the fair value of the reporting unit, which includes the goodwill to be assessed. If goodwill is determined to be impaired, a loss is recorded in accordance with SFAS No. 142. At September 30, 2003, the Partnership had $278.9 million of goodwill. Intangible assets with finite lives must be assessed for impairment whenever changes in circumstances indicate that the assets may be impaired. Similar to goodwill, the assessment for impairment requires estimates of future cash flows related to the intangible asset. To the extent the carrying value of the assets exceeds it future cash flows, an impairment loss is recorded based on the fair value of the asset.

Depreciation of Property, Plant and Equipment

Depreciation is calculated using the straight-line method based on the estimated useful lives of the assets ranging from 3 to 30 years. Net property, plant and equipment was $262.3 million for the Partnership at September 30, 2003. If circumstances required a change in estimated useful lives of the assets, it could have a material effect on results of operations. For example, if lives were shortened by one year, the Partnership estimates that depreciation for fiscal 2003 would have increased by approximately $2.8 million.

Assumptions Used in the Measurement of the Partnership’s Defined Benefit Obligations

SFAS No. 87, “Employers’ Accounting for Pensions” requires the Partnership to make assumptions as to the expected long-term rate of return that could be achieved on defined benefit plan assets and discount rates to determine the present value of the plans’ pension obligations. The Partnership evaluates these critical assumptions at least annually.

The discount rate enables the Partnership to state expected future cash flows at a present value on the measurement date. The rate is required to represent the market rate for high-quality fixed income investments. A lower discount rate increases the present value of benefit obligations and increases pension expense. A 25 basis point decrease in the discount rated used for fiscal 2003 would have increased pension expense by approximately $0.1 million and would have increased the minimum pension liability by another $1.8 million. The Partnership assumed a discount rate of 6.00% as of September 30, 2003.

28

Table of Contents

The Partnership considers the current and expected asset allocations, as well as historical and expected returns on various categories of plan assets to determine its expected long-term rate of return on pension plan assets. The expected long-term rate of return on assets is developed with input from the Partnership’s actuarial firm. The long-term rate of return assumption used for determining net periodic pension expense for fiscals 2002 and 2003 was 8.50 percent. As of September 30, 2003, this assumption was reduced to 8.25 percent for determining fiscal 2004 net periodic pension expense. A further 25 basis point decrease in the expected return on assets would have increased pension expense in fiscal 2003 by approximately $0.1 million.

Over the life of the plans, both gains and losses have been recognized by the plans in the calculation of annual pension expense. As of September 30, 2003, $17.2 million of unrecognized losses remain to be recognized by the plans. These losses may result in increases in future pension expense as they are recognized.

Insurance Reserves

The Partnership’s heating oil segment has in the past and is currently self-insuring a portion of workers’ compensation, auto and general liability claims. In February 2003, the propane segment also began self-insuring a portion of its workers’ compensation claims. The Partnership establishes reserves based upon expectations as to what its ultimate liability will be for these claims using developmental factors based upon historical claim experience. The Partnership continually evaluates the potential for changes in loss estimates with the support of qualified actuaries. As of September 30, 2003, the heating oil segment had approximately $29.4 million of insurance reserves and the propane segment had $1.1 million of insurance reserves. The ultimate settlement of these claims could differ materially from the assumptions used to calculate the reserves which could have a material effect on results of operations.

29

Table of Contents

ITEM 7A.

QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

The Partnership is exposed to interest rate risk primarily through its bank credit facilities. The Partnership utilizes these borrowings to meet its working capital needs and also to fund the short-term needs of its acquisition program.

At September 30, 2003, the Partnership had outstanding borrowings totaling $534.2 million, of which approximately $59.6 million is subject to variable interest rates under its Bank Credit Facilities. The Partnership also has interest rate swaps with a notional value of $55.0 million which swap fixed rate borrowings of 8.05% to variable rate borrowings based on the six month LIBOR interest rate plus 5.52%. In the event that interest rates associated with these facilities were to increase 100 basis points, the impact on future cash flows would be a decrease of approximately $1.1 million annually.

The Partnership also selectively uses derivative financial instruments to manage its exposure to market risk related to changes in the current and future market price of home heating oil, propane and natural gas. The value of market sensitive derivative instruments is subject to change as a result of movements in market prices. Consistent with the nature of hedging activity, associated unrealized gains and losses would be offset by corresponding decreases or increases in the purchase price the Partnership would pay for the home heating oil, propane or natural gas being hedged. Sensitivity analysis is a technique used to evaluate the impact of hypothetical market value changes. Based on a hypothetical ten percent increase in the cost of product at September 30, 2003, the potential impact on the Partnership’s hedging activity would be to increase the fair market value of these outstanding derivatives by $16.1 million to a fair market value of $26.1 million; and conversely a hypothetical ten percent decrease in the cost of product would decrease the fair market value of these outstanding derivatives by $8.9 million to a fair market value of $1.0 million.

ITEM 8.

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

SEE INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS PAGE F-1

ITEM 9.

CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON

ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

NONE

ITEM 9A.

CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

The General Partner’s principal executive officer and its principal financial officer evaluated the effectiveness of the Partnership’s disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on that evaluation, such principal executive officer and principal financial officer concluded that, the Partnership’s disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report have been designed and are functioning effectively to provide reasonable assurance that the information required to be disclosed by the Partnership in reports filed under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms. The General Partner and the Partnership believe that a controls system, no matter how well designed and operated, can not provide absolute assurance that the objectives of the controls system are met, and no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within a company have been detected.

No change in the Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting occurred during the Partnership’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect the Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting.

30

Table of Contents

PART III

ITEM 10.

DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT

Partnership Management

Star Gas LLC is the general partner of the Partnership. The membership interests in Star Gas LLC are owned by Audrey L. Sevin, Irik P. Sevin and Hanseatic Americas, Inc. The General Partner manages and operates the activities of the Partnership. Unitholders do not directly or indirectly participate in the management or operation of the Partnership. The General Partner owes a fiduciary duty to the Unitholders. However, the Partnership agreement contains provisions that allow the General Partner to take into account the interest of parties other than the Limited Partners in resolving conflict of interest, thereby limiting such fiduciary duty. Notwithstanding any limitation on obligations or duties, the General Partner will be liable, as the general partner of the Partnership, for all debts of the Partnership (to the extent not paid by the Partnership), except to the extent that indebtedness or other obligations incurred by the Partnership are made specifically non-recourse to the General Partner.

William P. Nicoletti, Paul Biddelman and Stephen Russell, who are neither officers nor employees of the General Partner nor directors, officers or employees of any affiliate of the General Partner, have been appointed to serve on the Audit Committee of the General Partner’s Board of Directors. The Partnership’s Board of Directors adopted an Audit Committee Charter during fiscal 2003. The Audit Committee has the authority to review, at the request of the General Partner, specific matters as to which the General Partner believes there may be a conflict of interest in order to determine if the resolution of such conflict proposed by the General Partner is fair and reasonable to the Partnership. Any matters approved by the Audit Committee will be conclusively deemed fair and reasonable to the Partnership, approved by all partners of the Partnership and not a breach by the General Partner of any duties it may owe the Partnership or the holders of Limited Partnership Units. In addition, the Audit Committee reviews the external financial reporting of the Partnership, selects and engages the Partnership’s independent accountants and approves all non audit engagements of the independent accountants. With respect to the additional matters, the Audit Committee may act on its own initiative to question the General Partner and, absent the delegation of specific authority by the entire Board of Directors, its recommendations will be advisory.

As is commonly the case with publicly traded limited partnerships, the Partnership does not directly employ any of the persons responsible for managing or operating the Partnership. The management and workforce of Star Gas Propane and certain employees of Petro manage and operate the Partnership’s business as officers of the General Partner and its Affiliates. See Item 1 - Business - Employees.

31

Table of Contents

Directors and Executive Officers of the General Partner

Directors are elected for one-year terms. The following table shows certain information for directors and executive officers of the general partner:

Irik P. Sevin has been the Chairman of the Board of Directors of Star Gas LLC since March 1999. From December 1993 to March 1999, Mr. Sevin served as Chairman of the Board of Directors of Star Gas Corporation, the predecessor general partner. Mr. Sevin has been a Director of Petro since its organization in October 1979, and Chairman of the Board of Petro since January 1993 and served as President of Petro from 1979 through January 1997. Mr. Sevin was an associate in the investment banking division of Kuhn Loeb & Co. and then Lehman Brothers Kuhn Loeb Incorporated from February 1975 to December 1978.

Joseph P. Cavanaugh has been Chief Executive Officer of the propane segment and member of the Office of the President of Star Gas LLC since March 1999. From December 1997 to March 1999 Mr. Cavanaugh served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Star Gas Corporation, the predecessor general partner. From October 1979 to December 1997, Mr. Cavanaugh held various financial and management positions with Petro. Prior to his current appointment Mr. Cavanaugh was also active in the Partnership’s management with the development of safety/compliance programs, assisting with acquisitions and their subsequent integration into the Partnership.

Angelo J. Catania has been Executive Vice President of the heating oil segment and member of the Office of the President of Star Gas LLC since April 2002. From March 1999 to April 2002, he served as Vice President and General Manager of the heating oil segment’s Mid-Atlantic region. From 1990 to 1999, Mr. Catania was employed by Petro where he served in various capacities, including Vice President of Acquisitions, General Manager, Regional Operations Manager and Co-Director of Acquisitions. From 1984 to 1990 he served as Chief Financial Officer and Vice President of Acme Oil Co., Inc.

Ami Trauber has been Chief Financial Officer of Star Gas LLC since November 2001. From 1996 to 2001, Mr. Trauber was the Chief Financial Officer of Syratech Corporation, a consumer goods company. From 1991 to 1995, Mr. Trauber was the President, Chief Operating Officer and part owner of Ed’s West, Inc., an apparel company. From 1978 to 1990, Mr. Trauber was Corporate Vice President – Finance and Controller of Harcourt General, Inc., a fortune 500 conglomerate.

32

Table of Contents

Richard F. Ambury has been Vice President and Treasurer of Star Gas LLC since March 1999. From February 1996 to March 1999, Mr. Ambury served as Vice President - Finance of Star Gas Corporation, the predecessor general partner. Mr. Ambury was employed by Petro from June 1983 through February 1996, where he served in various accounting/finance capacities. From 1979 to 1983, Mr. Ambury was employed by a predecessor firm of KPMG, a public accounting firm. Mr. Ambury has been a Certified Public Accountant since 1981.

James J. Bottiglieri has been Vice President of Star Gas LLC since March 1999, and has served as Controller of Petro since 1994. Mr. Bottiglieri was Assistant Controller of Petro from 1985 to 1994 and was elected Vice President in December 1992. From 1978 to 1984, Mr. Bottiglieri was employed by a predecessor firm of KPMG, a public accounting firm. Mr. Bottiglieri has been a Certified Public Accountant since 1980.

Audrey L. Sevin has been a Director of Star Gas LLC since March 1999 and was a Director of Star Gas Corporation, the predecessor general partner from December 1993 to March 1999. Mrs. Sevin served as the Secretary of Star Gas Corporation from June 1994 to March 1999. Mrs. Sevin had been a Director and Secretary of Petro since its organization in October 1979. Mrs. Sevin was a Director, executive officer and principal shareholder of A. W. Fuel Co., Inc. from 1952 until its purchase by Petro in May 1981.

Paul Biddelman has been a Director of Star Gas LLC since March 1999 and was a Director of Star Gas Corporation, the predecessor general partner from December 1993 to March 1999. Mr. Biddelman was a director of Petro from October 1994 until March 1999. Mr. Biddelman has been President of Hanseatic Corporation since December 1997. From April 1992 through December 1997, he was Treasurer of Hanseatic Corporation. Mr. Biddelman is a director of Celadon Group, Inc., Insituform Technologies, Inc., Six Flags, Inc. and System One Technologies, Inc.

Thomas J. Edelman has been a Director of Star Gas LLC since March 1999 and was a Director of Star Gas Corporation, the predecessor general partner from December 1993 to March 1999. Mr. Edelman was a Director of Petro from October 1983 until March 1999. Mr. Edelman has been Chairman of Patina Oil & Gas Corporation since its formation in May 1996. Mr. Edelman also serves as Chairman of Range Resources Corporation and Bear Cub Energy, LLC. He co-founded Snyder Oil Corporation and was its President and a Director from 1981 through February 1997. From 1975 to 1981, he was a Vice President of The First Boston Corporation.

I. Joseph Massoud has been a Director of Star Gas LLC since October 1999. Since 1998 he has been President of The Compass Group International LLC, a private equity investment firm based in Westport, CT. From 1995 to 1998, Mr. Massoud was employed by Petro as a Vice President. From 1993 to 1995, Mr. Massoud was a Vice President of Colony Capital, Inc., a Los Angeles based private equity firm specializing in acquiring distressed real estate and corporate assets. Mr. Massoud is also a director of CBS Personnel, CPM Acquisition Corp. and World Business Capital, Inc.

William P. Nicoletti has been a Director of Star Gas LLC since March 1999 and was a Director of Star Gas Corporation, the predecessor general partner from November 1995 until March 1999. He is Managing Director of Nicoletti & Company, Inc., a private investment banking firm. Mr. Nicoletti was formerly a senior officer and head of Energy Investment Banking for E. F. Hutton & Company, Inc., PaineWebber Incorporated and McDonald Investments, Inc. He is non-executive Chairman of the Board of Directors of Russell-Stanley Holdings, Inc. and is also a director of MarkWest Energy Partners, L.P. and Southwest Royalties, Inc.

Stephen Russell has been a Director of Star Gas LLC since October 1999 and was a director of Petro from July 1996 until March 1999. He has been Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of Celadon Group Inc., an international transportation company, since its inception in July 1986. Mr. Russell has been a member of the Board of Advisors of the Johnson Graduate School of Management, Cornell University since 1983.

Audrey Sevin is the mother of Irik P. Sevin. There are no other familial relationships between any of the directors and executive officers.

33

Table of Contents

Meetings and Compensation of Directors

During fiscal 2003, the Board of Directors met six times. All Directors attended each meeting except that Mr. Biddelman did not attend one meeting and Mr. Russell did not attend another meeting. Star Gas LLC pays each director including the chairman, an annual fee of $27,000. Effective July 1, 2003, the Chairman of the Audit Committee will also receive an annual retainer of $12,000 while the other Audit Committee members will receive $6,000 annual retainers. In addition, each member of the Audit Committee will receive $1,000 for every regular meeting attended and $500 for every telephonic meeting attended. Also effective July 1, 2003, the Chairman of the Compensation Committee and Distribution Committee will also receive an annual retainer of $6,000 while the other members of these committees will receive $3,000 annual retainers. The members of the Compensation and Distribution Committees will also receive $1,000 for every regular meeting attended and $500 for every telephonic meeting attended.

Messrs. Biddelman, Edelman, Massoud, Nicoletti and Russell each had 1,700 previously granted Restricted Senior Subordinated Units vest for fiscal 2003 under the Partnership’s Director and Employee Unit Incentive Plan. The value as of September 30, 2003 of these Senior Subordinated Units was $34,867 for each director. As of September 30, 2003, each director had 1,700 Restricted Senior Subordinated Units still outstanding that could vest under this plan if certain vesting targets are met in fiscal 2004.

Messrs. Biddelman, Edelman, Massoud, Nicoletti and Russell were each granted 2,709 Senior Subordinated Unit Appreciation Rights during fiscal 2003. Each of these directors forfeited $4,200 of director fees to obtain these rights. The Unit Appreciation Rights vest in three equal installments on October 1, 2002, October 1, 2003 and October 1, 2004. The grantee will be entitled to receive payment in cash for these UAR’s equal to the excess of the fair market value (as defined) of a Senior Subordinated Unit on October 1, 2005 (subject to deferral to a date no later than October 1, 2007) over the strike price of $10.70. These units were granted under the same program as units granted to the Chief Executive Officer and other certain named executives – see Item 11 – Executive Compensation.

Committees of the Board of Directors

Star Gas LLC’s Board of Directors has an Audit Committee, a Compensation Committee and a Distribution Committee. The members of each committee are appointed by the Board of Directors for a one-year term and until their respective successors are elected.

Audit Committee

The duties of the Audit Committee are described above under “Partnership Management.”

The current members of the Audit Committee are William P. Nicoletti, Paul Biddelman and Stephen Russell. During fiscal 2003, the audit committee met eight times. Members of the Audit Committee may not be employees of Star Gas LLC or its affiliated companies and must otherwise meet the New York Stock Exchange and SEC independence requirements for service on the Audit Committee. The Partnership’s Board of Director’s has determined that Mr. Nicoletti, the Chairman of the Audit Committee, meets the definition of an Audit Committee financial expert under applicable SEC and NYSE regulations and has also determined that all of the members of the Audit Committee, including Mr. Nicoletti meet the independence requirements of the NYSE and the SEC.

Compensation Committee

The current members of the Compensation Committee are Thomas J. Edelman and I. Joseph Massoud. The duties of the Compensation Committee are (i) to determine the annual salary, bonus and other benefits, direct and indirect, of any and all named executive officers (as defined under Regulation S-K promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission) and (ii) to review and recommend to the full Board any and all matters related to benefit plans covering the foregoing officers and any other employees. During fiscal 2003, the Compensation Committee met one time.

Distribution Committee

The current members of the Distribution Committee are Irik Sevin and Paul Biddelman. The duties of the Distribution Committee are to discuss and review the Partnership’s distributions. During fiscal 2003, the Distribution Committee met four times.

34

Table of Contents

Reimbursement of Expenses of the General Partner

The General Partner does not receive any management fee or other compensation for its management of Star Gas Partners. The General Partner is reimbursed at cost for all expenses incurred on the behalf of Star Gas Partners, including the cost of compensation, which is properly allocable to Star Gas Partners. The partnership agreement provides that the General Partner shall determine the expenses that are allocable to Star Gas Partners in any reasonable manner determined by the General Partner in its sole discretion. In addition, the General Partner and its affiliates may provide services to Star Gas Partners for which a reasonable fee would be charged as determined by the General Partner.

Adoption of Code of Ethics

The Partnership has adopted a written code of ethics that applied to the Partnership’s principal executive officer, principal financial officer, controller as well as for other key employees. The code of ethics is attached as an exhibit to this Form 10-K.

35

Table of Contents

ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

The following table sets forth the annual salary, bonuses and all other compensation awards and payouts to the Chief Executive Officer and to certain named executive officers for services rendered to Star Gas Partners and its subsidiaries during the fiscal years ended September 30, 2003, 2002 and 2001.