Back to GetFilings.com

Table of Contents

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)

OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT of 1934

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2003

Commission file number 0-24061

US LEC Corp.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Morrocroft III, 6801 Morrison Boulevard

Charlotte, North Carolina 28211

(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)

(704) 319-1000

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Not Applicable

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x  No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. Yes ¨  No x

As of August 7, 2003, there were 27,169,717 shares of Class A Common Stock outstanding.

Table of Contents

US LEC Corp.

Table of Contents

2

Table of Contents

PART 1.    FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1.    FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

US LEC Corp. and Subsidiaries

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations

(In Thousands, Except Per Share Data)

(Unaudited)

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements

3

Table of Contents

US LEC Corp. and Subsidiaries

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets

(In Thousands)

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements

4

Table of Contents

US LEC Corp. and Subsidiaries

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(In Thousands)

(Unaudited)

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements

5

Table of Contents

US LEC Corp. and Subsidiaries

Condensed Consolidated Statement of Stockholders’ Deficiency

For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2003

(In Thousands)

(Unaudited)

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements

6

Table of Contents

US LEC Corp. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(In Thousands, Except Per Share Data)

(Unaudited)

The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements of US LEC Corp. and its subsidiaries (“US LEC” or the “Company”) have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for interim financial information and the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X promulgated by the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and notes required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments considered necessary for a fair presentation for the periods indicated have been included. Operating results for the three and six months ended June 30, 2003 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2003. The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and related notes thereto included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002, which is on file with the SEC.

The Company has experienced net losses for the past three fiscal years, although quarterly losses have been decreasing. Recent quarterly results have also evidenced increasing revenue, particularly in end-customer revenue, growth in the number of customers and in other operating metrics. Management has focused the Company’s operating strategy on continuing to increase the number of end-customers, improving the efficiency of its network operations and in controlling administrative costs and capital expenditures. As of June 30, 2003, the Company had $35,999 in unrestricted cash and cash equivalents and experienced it’s second consecutive quarter of positive cash flow from operations. Management believes that these funds, together with cash flow expected to be generated from operations, will be sufficient to fund the Company’s operating, investing and financing activities for a period at least through June 30, 2004 and that the Company will be able to comply with the covenants in its senior secured credit facility during this period.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements — In May 2003, the FASB issued SFAS No. 150, “Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Characteristics of both Liabilities and Equity.” SFAS No. 150 establishes standards for classifying and measuring certain financial instruments with characteristics of both liabilities and equity. SFAS No. 150 requires an issuer to classify preferred stock as a liability at fair value when it becomes manditorily redeemable. All outstanding shares of the Series A Preferred Stock issued by the company in April 2000 are subject to mandatory redemption on April 11, 2010. Until the holders’ conversion option expires on April 10, 2010, redemption is conditional on the holder; accordingly, the stock does not become manditorily redeemable until that point in time. SFAS No. 150 is effective for financial instruments entered into or modified after May 31, 2003, and otherwise is effective at the beginning of the first interim period beginning after June 15, 2003.

Use of Estimates — The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Significant estimates relate to the allowance for doubtful accounts receivable, estimated end-customer contract life, accrual of network expenses payable to other telecommunications entities, income tax valuation allowance, and estimated useful

7

Table of Contents

lives of fixed assets. Any difference between the amounts recorded and amounts ultimately realized or paid will be adjusted prospectively as new facts become known.

There have been no changes to the Company’s significant accounting policies as set forth in Note 2 to the audited consolidated financial statements in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002.

Stock Based Compensation – The Company measures the compensation cost of its stock option plan under the provisions of Accounting Principles Board (APB) Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees”, as permitted under Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation”. Under the provisions of APB No. 25, compensation cost is measured based on the intrinsic value of the equity instrument awarded. Under the provisions of SFAS No. 123, compensation cost is measured based on the fair value of the equity instrument awarded.

Had compensation cost for the employee warrants and stock options been determined consistent with SFAS No. 123, the Company’s net loss and net loss per share would approximate the following proforma amounts:

The Company estimated the fair value for both the stock options and the warrants using the Black-Scholes model assuming no dividend yield for the quarter ending June 30, 2003 and 2002; volatility of 80% for 2003 and 2002, an average risk-free interest rate of 2.3% and 3.0% for the quarter ending June 30, 2003 and 2002, respectively, an expected life of 12 months for the warrants issued prior to 2002 and 5.2 and 4.8 years for the stock options for the quarter ending June 30, 2003 and 2002, respectively. The weighted average remaining contractual life of warrants and stock options outstanding at June 30, 2003 was 9.3 years and 7.9 years, respectively.

8

Table of Contents

The Company estimated the fair value of the Employee Stock Purchase Plan shares based upon the stock price at June 30, 2003 (the “issue date”). Compensation cost included in the proforma amounts above was estimated based upon the intrinsic value of the award at the issue date.

The restricted cash balance as of June 30, 2003 and December 31, 2002 currently serves as collateral for letters of credit related to certain office leases and for a portion of the insurance proceeds advanced for damages to certain property and equipment (see Note 4). Restricted cash is utilized to secure the Company’s performance of obligations such as letters of credit to support leases or deposits in restricted use accounts. The non-current portion of restricted cash in the amount of $940 is included in Other Assets on the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet.

During the quarter ended March 31, 2003, one of the Company’s telecommunications switch facilities experienced water damage. The Company is in the process of completing its insurance claim in regard to the incident. The Company estimates that property and equipment with a carrying value of approximately $1,600 was damaged and has been removed from the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet and charged to operations. During the quarter ended March 31, 2003, the Company received a preliminary advance of $1,000 of insurance proceeds and has recorded an insurance receivable in the amount of approximately $600 in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet. The recorded insurance recovery and the related receivable has been credited to operations and offsets the charge to operations.

On January 15, 2003, the Company acquired certain assets, primarily the internet service provider (“ISP”) customer contracts of Eagle Communications, Inc. (“Eagle”) in North Carolina, Georgia, Florida and Tennessee, and assumed certain operating liabilities. The price was $3,000 consisting of $1,250 paid in cash, and a $1,750 subordinated note with warrants to purchase 921 shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $1.90 per share. The purchase price was primarily allocated to the fair value of the customer contracts acquired. The $1,750 was allocated, based on the approximate relative fair values, $930 to the subordinated note and $820 to the warrants. The subordinated note is included in long-term debt and the warrants are included in additional paid-in-capital in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet as of June 30, 2003. The subordinated note bears interest at an annual rate of 11% payable monthly, has a five-year term and is subordinated to the senior credit facility. The warrants are exercisable immediately and expire upon the earlier of 10 years or five years from the repayment in full of the subordinated note.

The amendment of the Company’s senior secured credit facility on December 31, 2002 included revised covenants that commenced in 2003. The revised financial covenants were designed to conform to the business plan provided by the Company to its senior lenders in connection with the amendment. The covenants include: achievement of minimum levels of earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, amortization and credit restructuring costs; maintenance of a minimum specified gross margin percentage (as defined); limits on the amount of capital expenditures; maintenance of minimum levels of unrestricted cash; and beginning in March 2005, maintenance of specified total leverage, cash interest coverage and minimum fixed charge coverage ratios. Management believes that the Company will be in compliance with all financial covenants for a period at least through June 2004 based on projected operating results. The operating results reflected in the business plan are dependent on the Company meeting targets for new customers, customer retention, customer usage, billing rates, gross margins and selling, general, and administrative costs and as a result involve some degree of uncertainty. Should any of these assumptions not be achieved for a particular period, it is possible that one or more financial covenants will not be met for the period through June 2004. If a waiver of a financial covenant violation or an amendment of a financial covenant cannot be obtained, the lenders would have the right under the credit

9

Table of Contents

agreement to certain remedies, including acceleration of debt repayment. The amount outstanding under the Company’s senior secured credit facility at June 30, 2003 was $127,800.

The deregulation of the telecommunications industry, the implementation of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 (“Telecom Act”) and the distress of many carriers in the wake of the downturn in the telecommunications industry have involved numerous industry participants, including the Company, in lawsuits, proceedings and arbitrations before state and federal regulatory commissions, private arbitration organizations such as the American Arbitration Association, and courts over many issues important to the financial and operational success of the Company. These issues include the interpretation and enforcement of existing interconnection agreements, the terms of new interconnection agreements the Company may enter into, operating performance obligations, inter-carrier compensation, access rates applicable to different categories of traffic including traffic originating from or terminating to cellular or wireless users and the jurisdiction of traffic for compensation purposes. The Company anticipates that it will continue to be involved in various lawsuits, arbitrations and proceedings over these and other material issues. The Company anticipates also that further legislative and regulatory rulemaking will occur—on the federal and state level—as the industry deregulates and as the Company enters new markets or offers new products. Rulings adverse to the Company, adverse legislation, or changes in governmental policy on issues material to the Company could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition or results of its operations. Revenue recognized and amounts recorded as allowances for doubtful accounts in the accompanying financial statements have been determined considering the impact, if any, of the items described below. Except as noted below, items described herein did not impact the accompanying consolidated financial statements.

Reciprocal Compensation – On April 27, 2001, the Federal Communications Commission (“FCC”) released an Order on Remand and Report and Order (the “Remand Order”) addressing inter-carrier compensation for traffic terminated to ISPs. The interpretation and enforcement of the Remand Order will likely be the most important factor in the Company’s efforts to collect reciprocal compensation for ISP-bound traffic in the future. In the Remand Order, the FCC addressed a number of important issues, including the rules under which carriers are to compensate each other for traffic terminated to ISPs and the rates applicable for ISP-bound traffic as well as traffic bound to other customers.

While the Remand Order provides greater certainty about the Company’s right to bill for traffic terminated to ISPs, the effect of the Remand Order on the Company will depend on how it is interpreted and enforced. In particular, there are uncertainties as to whether the Remand Order has any effect on the Company’s pending proceedings seeking to collect compensation for traffic previously terminated to ISPs; whether certain provisions of the Remand Order will be applied state-by-state, market-by-market and/or carrier-by-carrier; whether the limitations on growth of ISP traffic in the Remand Order will survive legal challenge; and whether the incumbent carrier will efficiently trigger the rate reductions and other limitations set forth in the Remand Order.

On May 3, 2002, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia (the “D.C. Circuit”) rejected the FCC’s legal analysis in the Remand Order and remanded the order to the FCC for further review (the “Second Remand”), but the D.C. Circuit did not vacate the Remand Order. As such, the ISP compensation structure established by the FCC in the Remand Order remains in effect. Although several carriers petitioned the U.S. Supreme Court for certiorari over the issue of whether the Order can be remanded but not vacated, the Supreme Court denied that Petition. It is unclear at this time whether, how or when the FCC will respond to the Second Remand, how the Second Remand will affect pending disputes over reciprocal compensation for ISP traffic, how the Remand Order will be interpreted in light of the Second Remand or whether affected parties will undertake new challenges to the ISP compensation structure established by the Remand Order while the FCC still has the Second Remand under consideration.

10

Table of Contents

If the Remand Order or the Second Remand were to be interpreted in a manner adverse to the Company on all or any of the issues, or if the Remand Order is modified as a result of the Second Remand or other pending or new legal challenges, it could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s ability to collect reciprocal compensation for ISP-bound traffic in the future.

In September 2001, the Company filed a proceeding with the Virginia State Corporation Commission (“VSCC”) and the FCC seeking to collect reciprocal compensation from Verizon payable for traffic bound for ISPs as well as other customers. The VSCC declined jurisdiction over the dispute. In January 2002, the FCC accepted jurisdiction over the dispute. Prior to the Company’s filing a complaint against Verizon at the FCC, and in a separate, but related, case, the FCC held that the contract with Verizon (that the Company had adopted) did not obligate the parties to pay reciprocal compensation for traffic bound for ISPs. That decision was appealed to the U. S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit. In June 2002, Verizon filed a complaint against the Company in the U. S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia seeking a declaratory ruling that Verizon is not obligated to pay the Company reciprocal compensation for traffic bound for ISPs under the agreement adopted by the Company. The Company moved to dismiss Verizon’s complaint based on a number of factors; the Court took the Company’s motion under advisement and directed the Company to initiate a proceeding against Verizon at the FCC. On September 5, 2002, the Company filed a Formal Complaint with the FCC’s Enforcement Bureau seeking to collect reciprocal compensation from Verizon for traffic bound for ISPs. Verizon answered, denying liability. Pending the outcome of the appeal in the related case, the FCC converted the Company’s case against Verizon into an informal complaint and has placed it on an administrative hold. On July 18, 2003, the D.C. Circuit issued a decision in the related case and held that the FCC had erred when it concluded that the contract the Company had adopted did not obligate the parties to pay reciprocal compensation for traffic bound for ISPs and remanded the case to the FCC for further proceedings. In light of these developments, as well as the Second Remand, the Company cannot predict when this dispute will be resolved or whether the Company will ultimately be successful.

Disputed Access Revenues – Previously, a number of interexchange carriers (“IXCs”) had refused to pay access charges to competitive local exchange carriers (“CLECs”), including the Company, alleging that the access charges exceed the rates charged by the ILECs, as well as disputing the rates applicable to different categories of traffic and the jurisdiction of traffic for compensation purposes. Currently there are a number of court cases, regulatory proceedings at the FCC and legislative efforts involving such challenges. The Company cannot predict the outcome of these cases, regulatory proceedings and legislative efforts or their impact on access rates.

On April 27, 2001, the FCC released its Seventh Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (the “Access Order”) in which it established a benchmark rate at which a CLEC’s interstate access charges will be presumed to be reasonable and which CLECs may impose on IXCs by tariff. The Access Order addresses a number of issues important to how CLECs charge IXCs for originating and terminating interstate toll and toll free traffic.

The Access Order should provide certainty as to the Company’s right to bill IXCs for interstate access at rates at or below the FCC benchmark even though above those tariffed by the ILECs. Notwithstanding the apparent certainty created by the Access Order, its effect on the Company will depend on how the Access Order is interpreted and enforced and the outcome of appeals and requests for reconsideration currently pending. If the Access Order is interpreted or enforced in a manner adverse to the Company as it relates to periods prior to the effective date, such result could have a material adverse effect on the Company.

On May 30, 2001, the FCC issued a decision in AT&T Corp. v. Business Telecom Inc. (the “BTI Decision”), in which the FCC determined that the interstate access rates charged by Business Telecom, Inc. (“BTI”) were not just and reasonable. The FCC determined that just and reasonable rates for BTI were properly based upon the lowest band of rates charged by the National Exchange Carriers Association (“NECA”). The FCC based this holding on the limited evidence before it, tending to show that BTI’s operations were similar to

11

Table of Contents

those of small, urban ILECs, many of whom charge the lowest band NECA rates. Appeals of the BTI Decision were subsequently withdrawn. As with the Access Order described above, the BTI Decision’s effect on the Company will depend on how the order is interpreted. If the BTI Decision is interpreted in a manner adverse to the Company, such result could have a material adverse effect on the revenue previously booked by the Company as well as the ability of the Company to collect certain access charges from IXC’s in the future.

Due to the federal bankruptcy filing by WorldCom, during the quarter ended June 30, 2002, the Company established an additional provision of $9,500 for doubtful accounts for the remaining outstanding receivables owed to the Company by WorldCom which is included in Selling, General and Administrative expenses. The Company is pursuing its claim for the payment of all outstanding charges in the WorldCom bankruptcy proceeding, but is fully reserved for the amount due from WorldCom for all pre-petition amounts. During the quarter ended June 30, 2003, the Company reevaluated the classification of the receivables and reserves related to carriers that filed bankruptcy and determined, based on all available information that these balances are non-current. As a result, the receivable from bankrupt carriers (including WorldCom) and the related reserve have been included in Other Assets – non-current in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet at June 30, 2003.

On September 18, 2002, US LEC filed a Petition for Declaratory Ruling with the FCC requesting that the FCC reaffirm its prior positions that access charges can be collected by local exchange carriers in connection with calls originating or terminating on the networks of wireless carriers. A number of different carriers have filed comments in support of, and in opposition to, US LEC’s petition. In addition, in September 2002, ITC^DeltaCom Communications, Inc. (“ITC”) filed a lawsuit against the Company alleging that in an effort to collect access charges from ITC for originating wireless traffic destined for ITC’s toll-free customers, US LEC blocked certain signaling data for calls originated on the networks of US LEC’s wireless carrier customers that would allow the call to be identified as a wireless call. ITC’s lawsuit alleged claims based on a number of different legal theories. US LEC, through counsel, investigated ITC’s allegations, and discovered no evidence to support ITC’s claims. US LEC denied ITC’s allegations and asserted a counterclaim against ITC to recover outstanding access charges owed by ITC. Following the close of discovery, and notice from the Company to ITC and its counsel that the Company would seek sanctions against them for the frivolous allegations in the complaint, ITC sought leave of court to file an amended complaint. In the proposed amended complaint, ITC dropped the allegations that US LEC affirmatively blocked certain signaling data and altered its legal theories of recovery. The Company filed a dispositive motion, seeking early resolution of the case. In addition to the lawsuit filed in federal court, ITC also filed an informal complaint with the FCC challenging US LEC’s right to recover access charges on calls originating from wireless carriers. The informal complaint was closed without the FCC taking any action. In addition, it is possible that certain other carriers have sought to challenge the Company’s right to bill traffic from wireless customers. The Company also received a separate request for information from the Enforcement Bureau of the FCC concerning the Company’s billing for wireless traffic and its methods of billing. The Company is responding to the FCC’s request. Further, the Company is discussing with the FCC its belief that no additional proceedings are warranted by the agency beyond those already pending on the issue of terminating calls originating on the networks of wireless carriers, including the proceeding commenced by US LEC requesting guidance to the industry on the issue. If the FCC does not reaffirm its prior guidance, the inability of US LEC to recover access charges from IXCs for traffic originating on the networks of wireless carrier customers could have a material adverse impact on US LEC’s revenue.

In light of the general conditions prevailing in the telecommunications industry, there is a risk of further delinquencies, nonpayment or bankruptcies by other telecommunications carriers that owe outstanding amounts derived from access and facility revenues billed by the Company. Such events, in the aggregate, could have an adverse effect on the Company’s performance in future periods. The Company is unable to predict such events at this time.

Legislation – Periodically, legislation has been introduced in the U.S. House of Representatives or the U.S. Senate to alter or amend the Telecom Act. It is the Telecom Act which opened the local telephone markets for

12

Table of Contents

competition and outlines many of the ground rules pursuant to which the ILECs and the CLECs operate with respect to each other. The Company anticipates that additional efforts will be made to alter or amend the Telecom Act. The Company cannot predict whether any particular piece of legislation will become law and how the Telecom Act might be modified. The passage of legislation amending the Telecom Act could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s future operations and its future financial results.

Interconnection Agreements with ILECs – The Company has agreements for the interconnection of its networks with the networks of the ILECs covering each market in which US LEC has installed a switching platform. US LEC may be required to negotiate new interconnection agreements as it enters new markets in the future. In addition, as its existing interconnection agreements expire, it will be required to negotiate extension or replacement agreements. The Company recently concluded interconnection arbitrations with Verizon in order to obtain new interconnection agreements on terms acceptable to the Company and is awaiting results from those arbitrations from several Public Utility Commissions (“PUCs”). There can be no assurance that the Company will successfully negotiate, successfully arbitrate or otherwise obtain such additional agreements for interconnection with the ILECs or renewals of existing interconnection agreements on terms and conditions acceptable to the Company.

Interconnection with Other Carriers – The Company anticipates that as its interconnections with various carriers increase, the issue of seeking compensation for the termination or origination of traffic whether by reciprocal arrangements, access charges or other charges will become increasingly complex. The Company does not anticipate that it will be cost effective to negotiate agreements with every carrier with which the Company exchanges originating and/or terminating traffic. The Company will make a case-by-case analysis of the cost effectiveness of committing resources to these interconnection agreements or otherwise billing and paying such carriers.

Stock Options – The Company adopted the US LEC Corp. Omnibus Stock Plan (the “Plan”) in January 1998. The number of Class A Common Stock reserved for issuance under the Plan is 5,000 shares. In December 2002, the Company announced a voluntary option exchange offer for the holders of stock options issued under the Plan with an exercise price of $4.00 or more. Approximately 3,231 options were eligible for the exchange offer. Following the expiration of the exchange offer on January 29, 2003, the Company accepted for exchange eligible options tendered to it for 2,857 shares of Class A Common Stock and cancelled all of these options. The Company granted new options for 2,776 to the tendering option holders on August 1, 2003 at an exercise price of $4.06, the fair market value of the Class A Common Stock in accordance with the Plan. As of June 30, 2003, options to purchase 1,457 shares of Class A Common Stock were outstanding under the Plan.

Employee Stock Purchase Plan – The Company established an Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the “ESPP”) in September 2000. Under the ESPP, employees may elect to invest up to 10% of their compensation in order to purchase shares of the Company’s Class A Common Stock at a price equal to 85% of the market value at either the beginning or end of the offering period, whichever is less. The number of Class A Common Stock reserved for issuance under the ESPP is 2,000 shares. As of June 30, 2003, the Company had issued 1,434 shares under the ESPP.

13

Table of Contents

ITEM 2.    MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF                   OPERATIONS

Except for the historical information contained herein, this report contains forward-looking statements, subject to uncertainties and risks, including the demand for US LEC’s services, the ability of the Company to introduce additional products, the ability of the Company to successfully attract and retain personnel, competition in existing and potential additional markets, uncertainties as to the stability of other telecommunication carriers, uncertainties regarding its dealings with ILECs and other telecommunications carriers and facilities providers, regulatory uncertainties, and the possibility of adverse decisions related to reciprocal compensation and access charges owed to the Company by other carriers. These and other applicable risks are summarized in Notes 1 and 6 to the condensed consolidated financial statements appearing in this report and in the “Forward-Looking Statements and Risk Factors” section and elsewhere in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2002, and in other reports which are on file with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”).

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2003 Compared With The Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2002

Net revenue increased to $78.3 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2003 from $58.8 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2002. For the six months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002, revenue was $151.4 million and $112.7 million, respectively. Net revenue increased primarily due to net end-customer additions to a total of 12,345, an increase in data services sold to end-customers and increased minutes of use on the Company’s network for long distance and access traffic. Approximately 97% of the Company’s net revenue is currently derived from two sources – end-customers and carrier charges, which include access charges and reciprocal compensation. Less than 2% of the Company’s net revenue is derived from other sources, including wholesale customers, installation revenue, and other miscellaneous sources. Wholesale revenue is revenue charged to other telecommunications carriers for the termination of their telecommunications traffic, but does not include reciprocal compensation or access charges. The following table provides a breakdown of the two primary components of net revenue:

The increase in the percentage of revenue from end customers in the quarter and six months ended ended June 30, 2003 is the result of growth in the number of end customers and a reduction of intercarrier rates for reciprocal compensation. The Company also implemented the third step-down of interstate access rates as mandated by the FCC on June 20, 2003.

Network expenses are comprised primarily of leased transport (including facility installation) and usage charges and excludes all depreciation and amortization expense which is reported separately (see below). Network expenses increased to $36.7 million, or 47% of revenue, for the quarter ended June 30, 2003, from $28.9 million, or 49% of revenue, for the quarter ended June 30, 2002. For the six months ended June 30, 2003 and June 30, 2002, network expenses increased to $71.7 million, or 47% of revenue, from $56.1 million, or 50% of revenue. The decrease in network expenses as a percentage of revenue was primarily a result of cost reduction efforts completed by the Company to reduce recurring costs for a customer facility as well as a reduction in rates per minute charged to the Company and the increase in revenue.

14

Table of Contents

Selling, general and administrative expenses (“SG&A”) for the quarter ended June 30, 2003 increased to $31.3 million, or 40% of revenue, compared to $27.9 million, or 47% of revenue excluding an additional provision for doubtful accounts of $9.5 million due to the bankruptcy filing of WorldCom, Inc. (“WorldCom”), for the quarter ended June 30, 2002. For the six months ended June 30, 2003 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2002, SG&A decreased to $60.9 million, or 40% of revenue, from $53.8 million, or 48% of revenue excluding an additional provision for doubtful accounts of $9.5 million due to the bankruptcy filing of WorldCom. The increase in SG&A was primarily comprised of costs associated with developing and expanding the infrastructure of the Company as it expands into new markets and adds new products, and include expenses associated with personnel, sales and marketing, occupancy, bad debt, administration and billing, as well as legal fees associated with litigation. The decrease in SG&A as a percentage of revenue for both the three and six months ended June 30, 2003 was due to expense control, an improvement in back office efficiencies and growth in revenue.

Depreciation and amortization for the quarter ended June 30, 2003 increased to $12.4 million from $11.1 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2002. For the six months ended June 30, 2003 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2002 depreciation and amortization expense increased to $23.8 million from $21.6 million. The increase in depreciation and amortization is due to the addition of depreciable assets to accommodate the growth in the number of customers and services.

Interest income for the three and six months ended June 30, 2003 was $0.1 million and $0.2 million, respectively, compared to interest income of $0.2 million and $0.6 million, respectively, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2002. The decrease in interest income in 2003 was primarily due to a decline in cash available for investing and declining rates of return on invested funds.

Interest expense for the three and six months ended June 30, 2003 was $2.2 million and $4.2 million, respectively, compared to $2.2 million and $4.4 million for the comparable periods in 2002. Interest expense remained relatively flat due to a decrease in the amounts borrowed under the Company’s senior credit facility and declining interest rates offset by an increase in accrued additional interest related to the deferred portion of the Company’s senior secured credit facility term loan and additional interest paid to the subordinated debt holders.

For the three and six months June 30, 2003 and 2002, the Company did not record an income tax benefit. The Company has provided a full valuation allowance against deferred assets resulting from net operating losses, as management cannot conclude, based on the weight of available evidence, that it is more likely than not that such assets will be ultimately realized. During the quarter ended June 30, 2003, the Company reevaluated the classification of the receivables and reserves related to carriers that filed bankruptcy and determined, based on all available information that these balances are non-current. As a result, the deferred tax asset related to these receivables and the related reserves reflect this reclassification.

Net loss for the three and six months ended June 30, 2003 amounted to $4.1 million and $8.9 million, respectively. Dividends accrued on Series A Preferred Stock for the three and six months ended June 30, 2003 amounted to $3.6 million and $7.1 million, respectively. The accretion of preferred stock issuance cost for the three and six months ended June 30, 2003 amounted to $137,000 and $272,000, respectively.

As a result of the foregoing, net loss attributable to common stockholders for the three months ended June 30, 2003 amounted to $7.9 million, or ($0.29) per diluted share compared to net loss of $24.0 million, or ($0.91) per diluted share for the three months ended June 30, 2002. For the six months ended June 30, 2003 net loss attributable to common stockholders amounted to $16.3 million, or ($0.61) per diluted share compared to net loss of $39.1 million, or ($1.48) per diluted share for the six months ended June 30, 2002.

15

Table of Contents

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

The amount outstanding under the Company’s senior secured credit facility at June 30, 2003 was $127.8 million and the advances under the facility bear interest at an average annual rate of 5.32%. During the quarter ended June 30, 2003, the Company continued to focus its operating strategy on increasing end customer revenue, customer retention, improving the efficiency of its network operations and in controlling selling and administrative costs and capital expenditures. Recent quarterly results have shown increases in total net revenue, end customer revenue, the number of customers and other operating metrics. Although the magnitude of capital expenditures required has declined since the Company’s network build-out was completed, management expects that substantial investment will be required as new customers are added to the Company’s network. During the six months ended June 30, 2003, capital expenditures were $16.6 million. Management believes the Company’s expected cash flow from operating activities together with cash on hand at June 30, 2003 of $36.0 million, will be sufficient to meet the Company’s operating, investing and financing obligations as they come due for a period at least through June 30, 2004.

In amending its senior secured credit facility on December 31, 2002, the Company agreed to revised financial covenants designed to conform to the business plan provided by the Company to its senior lenders in connection with the amendment. The covenants include: achievement of minimum levels of earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, amortization and credit restructuring costs; maintenance of a minimum specified gross margin percentage (as defined), limits on the amount of capital expenditures; maintenance of minimum levels of unrestricted cash; and beginning in March 2005, maintenance of specified total leverage, cash interest coverage and minimum fixed charge coverage ratios. Measurements of the revised covenants commenced in 2003. The Company was in compliance with all financial covenants at June 30, 2003 and management believes the Company will continue to comply with all financial covenants at least through June 2004. The operating results reflected in the Company’s business plan are dependent on meeting targets for new customers, customer retention, customer usage, billing rates, gross margins and selling, general, and administrative costs and as a result involve some degree of uncertainty. Should any of these assumptions not be achieved for a particular period, it is possible that a financial covenant will not be met for the period through June 2004. If a waiver or amendment of the financial covenant cannot not be obtained, the lenders would have the right under the credit agreement to certain remedies including acceleration of debt repayment.

Cash provided from operating activities was $27.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2003 compared to $7.7 million of cash used in the six months ended June 30, 2002. The increase in cash provided in operating activities of $34.9 million was primarily the result of two factors. Cash provided from net income adjusted for non-cash items increased by approximately $25.5 million, and operating cash provided from changes in working capital items increased by approximately $10.6 million. The overall increase in cash provided in operating activities reflects both improvements in Company operations and the Company’s effort to aggressively pursue collections both from carriers and from end customers.

The Company generated EBITDA of $10.3 million, or 13% of revenue, for the quarter ended June 30, 2003, an increase of $17.7 million over the second quarter 2002. This increase in EBITDA is the result of the Company’s operating strategy as noted above. EBITDA is defined by the Company as net income (loss) before interest income and expense, income taxes, depreciation and amortization. While EBITDA should not be construed as a substitute for net income (loss) or as a better measure of liquidity than net cash provided by operating activities, which are determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States (“GAAP”), management believes, that EBITDA is a useful measure of the Company’s ability to generate cash to meet future debt service, capital expenditures and working capital requirements. Management believes EBITDA is also used by investors and analysts to evaluate companies in the telecommunications industry. Because EBITDA is not a measurement determined in accordance with GAAP, it may not be comparable to other similarly titled measures of other companies.

16

Table of Contents

Management believes net cash provided by (used in) operating activities is the financial measure calculated and presented in accordance with GAAP that is the most directly comparable to EBITDA. The following table reconciles EBITDA with net cash provided by (used in) operating activities derived directly from the condensed consolidated financial statements for the three and six months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002:

Cash used in investing activities decreased to $17.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2003 from $18.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2002. The investing activities are primarily related to purchases of switching and related telecommunications equipment, office equipment and leasehold improvements and include the acquisition of ISP contracts from Eagle during the six months ended June 30, 2003.

Cash provided by financing activities was $350,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2003 compared to cash used of $4.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2002. A small portion of the proceeds from the $5.0 million subordinated notes issued at December 31, 2002 were received in January 2003. These proceeds were offset by mandatory prepayments and loan fees paid in the six months ended June 30, 2003.

Restricted cash classified as current was $0.6 million and $1.1 million as of June 30, 2003 and December 31, 2002, respectively. At June 30, 2003, $0.9 million of restricted cash is non-current and is included in Other Assets on the condensed consolidated balance sheets. Restricted cash primarily serves as collateral for letters of credit related to certain office leases and for a portion of the insurance proceeds advanced for damages to certain property and equipment. Restricted cash is utilized to secure the Company’s performance of obligations such as letters of credit to support leases or deposits in restricted use accounts. At June 30, 2003, in accordance with the Company’s credit facility, an additional $500,000 was allocated to restricted cash for a portion of the insurance proceeds advanced for water damages to certain property and equipment. The Company is in the process of completing its insurance claim in regard to the incident. During the quarter ended March 31, 2003, the Company received a preliminary advance of $1.0 million of insurance proceeds.

The following table provides a summary of the Company’s contractual obligations and commercial commitments. Additional detail about these items is included in the notes to the consolidated financial statements.

(in millions)

17

Table of Contents

(1)    Interest on long-term bank debt is charged using a floating rate based, at the Company’s option, on a base rate (as defined in the loan agreement) or the London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”), plus a specified margin. The Company will also accrue additional interest on the deferred portion of the term loan amounts at an annual rate of 10%, payable upon the maturity of the loan in December 2006.

(2)    Interest is payable monthly on the $6.75 million face value of the subordinated notes at an annual rate of 11%. In addition, the discount on the subordinated notes, determined based upon the relative fair values of the notes and related warrants, totaled $3.1 million. This amount will be amortized to the statement of operations until the maturity date of the subordinated notes. The amount included here reflects the face value of the notes upon maturity.

Uncertainties and Contingencies

The Company’s receivables are subject to certain uncertainties and contingencies related to regulatory, judicial and legislative policies and actions as well as resolutions of disputes with carriers over reciprocal compensation and access revenue. For further discussion, See Note 6 to the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES

There have been no changes to the critical accounting policies and estimates as disclosed at Part II, Item 7 in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002.

ITEM 3.    QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

US LEC is exposed to various types of market risk in the normal course of business, including the impact of interest rate changes on its investments and debt. As of June 30, 2003, investments consisted primarily of institutional money market funds. A majority of the Company’s long-term debt consists of variable rate instruments with interest rates that are based on a floating rate which, at the Company’s option, is determined by either a base rate or LIBOR, plus, in each case, a specified margin. The Company has total variable rate bank debt of $127.8 million as of June 30, 2003. Currently, quarterly interest expense, net of interest income, is approximately $2.0 million. Although it is difficult to predict the impact of interest rate changes on the Company’s financial statements, each one percent increase or decrease in interest rates will have approximately a $1.3 million annual impact on the financial statements of the Company, depending somewhat on timing of the repayments, its maturity and other factors.

Although US LEC does not currently utilize any interest rate management tools, it continues to evaluate the use of derivatives such as, but not limited to, interest rate swap agreements to manage its interest rate risk. As the Company’s investments are all short-term in nature and a majority of its long-term debt is at variable short-term rates, management believes the carrying values of the Company’s financial instruments approximate fair values.

ITEM 4.    CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Our management, under the supervision and with the participation of our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures within 90 days of the filing date of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. Based on this evaluation, our principal executive officer and principal financial officer have concluded that the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures are effective. There were no significant changes in our internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect these controls subsequent to the date the evaluation was completed.

18

Table of Contents

PART II    OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.    Legal Proceedings

US LEC is not currently a party to any material legal proceeding, other than proceedings, arbitrations, and any appeals thereof, related to reciprocal compensation, intercarrier access and other amounts due from other carriers. For a description of these proceedings and developments that have occurred during the quarter ended June 30, 2003, see Note 6 to the condensed consolidated financial statements appearing elsewhere in this report.

Item 4.    Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

US LEC’s annual meeting of stockholders was held on May 22, 2003 to elect eight directors for a one-year term. Two directors were elected by the holders of the Company’s Series A Preferred Stock. Six directors were elected by the holders of the Company’s Class A Common Stock and the holders of the Series A Preferred Stock, voting together as a single class with the holders of the Series A Preferred Stock voting on an “as converted basis.” The name of each director elected at the meeting and the number of votes cast for or withheld with respect to, each director as set forth below.

19

Table of Contents

20

Table of Contents

Item 6.    Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K

(a)    Exhibits:

(b)    On April 29, 2003, the Company filed a Current Report on Form 8-K to furnish as an exhibit under Item 9 and Item 12 a press release announcing the Company’s results of operations for the quarter ended March 31, 2003.

21

Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

US LEC Corp.

By: /s/Michael K. Robinson

Michael K. Robinson

Executive Vice President and

Chief Financial Officer

August 8, 2003

22