Back to GetFilings.com

Table of Contents

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2003

OR

For the transition period from                                 to                                 

Commission file number 0-22039

WELLS REAL ESTATE FUND IX, L.P.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

(Former name, former address, and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes x    No ¨

Table of Contents

FORM 10-Q

WELLS REAL ESTATE FUND IX, L.P.

(A Georgia Public Limited Partnership)

TABLE OF CONTENTS

2

Table of Contents

WELLS REAL ESTATE FUND IX, L.P.

(A Georgia Public Limited Partnership)

BALANCE SHEETS

See accompanying notes

3

Table of Contents

WELLS REAL ESTATE FUND IX, L.P.

(A Georgia Public Limited Partnership)

STATEMENTS OF INCOME

See accompanying notes

4

Table of Contents

WELLS REAL ESTATE FUND IX, L.P.

(A Georgia Public Limited Partnership)

STATEMENTS OF PARTNERS’ CAPITAL

FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2002

AND THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2003 (UNAUDITED)

See accompanying notes

5

Table of Contents

WELLS REAL ESTATE FUND IX, L.P.

(A Georgia Public Limited Partnership)

STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

See accompanying notes

6

Table of Contents

WELLS REAL ESTATE FUND IX, L.P.

(A Georgia Public Limited Partnership)

CONDENSED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

JUNE 30, 2003 (UNAUDITED)

1.    SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

(a) Organization and Business

Wells Real Estate Fund IX, L.P. (the “Partnership”) is a Georgia public limited partnership with Leo F. Wells, III and Wells Partners, L.P. (“Wells Partners”), a Georgia nonpublic limited partnership, serving as the general partners (the “General Partners”). The Partnership was formed on August 15, 1994 for the purpose of acquiring, developing, constructing, owning, operating, improving, leasing, and managing income-producing commercial properties for investment purposes. Upon subscription, limited partners elect to have their units treat their units as Class A units or Class B units. Limited partners shall have the right to change their prior elections to have some or all of their units treated as Class A or Class B units one time during each quarterly accounting period. Limited partners may vote to, among other things, (a) amend the partnership agreement, subject to certain limitations, (b) change the business purpose or investment objectives of the Partnership, and (c) add or remove a General Partner. A majority vote on any of the above described matters will bind the Partnership without the concurrence of the General Partners. Each limited partnership unit has equal voting rights regardless of class.

On January 5, 1996, the Partnership commenced a public offering of up to $35,000,000 of limited partnership units pursuant to a Registration Statement filed on Form S-11 filed under the Securities Act of 1933. The Partnership commenced active operations on February 12, 1996 upon receiving and accepting subscriptions for 125,000 units and collecting aggregate gross offering proceeds of $2,500,000, thus allowing for the admission of New York and Pennsylvania investors in the Partnership. The offer terminated on December 30, 1996 at which time approximately 2,935,931 Class A units and 564,069 Class B units had been sold to 1,841 and 257 Class A and Class B Limited Partners, respectively, for total limited partner Capital Contributions of $35,000,000. As of June 30, 2003, the Partnership had paid a total of $1,400,000 in acquisition and advisory fees and acquisition expenses, and $5,254,700 in selling commissions and organization and offering expenses, and invested $13,289,359 in Fund VIII-IX Associates and invested $15,030,434 in Fund IX-X-XI-REIT Associates. The Partnership held net offering proceeds of $25,507 as of June 30, 2003, which is available for investment in properties.

The Partnership owns interests in all of its real estate assets through Joint Ventures with other Wells Real Estate Funds. As of June 30, 2003, the Partnership owned interests in the following 9 properties through the affiliated Joint Ventures (the “Joint Ventures) listed below:

7

Table of Contents

Each of the aforementioned properties was acquired on an all cash basis. For further information regarding the foregoing Joint Ventures and properties, refer to the report filed for the Partnership on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002.

(b) Basis of Presentation

The financial statements of the Partnership have been prepared in accordance with rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission, including the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X, and in accordance with such rules and regulations, do not include all of the information and footnotes required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”) for complete financial statements. The quarterly statements included herein have not been examined by independent auditors. However, in the opinion of the General Partners, the statements for the unaudited interim periods presented include all adjustments that are of a normal and recurring nature and necessary to fairly present the results for these periods. Results for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of full year results. For further information, refer to the financial statements and footnotes included in the Partnership’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002.

(c) Allocations of Net Income, Net Loss and Gain on Sale

For the purposes of determining allocations per the partnership agreement, net income is defined as net income recognized by the Partnership, excluding deductions for depreciation and amortization. Net income, as

8

Table of Contents

defined, of the Partnership will be allocated each year in the same proportions that net cash from operations is distributed to the limited partners holding Class A units and the General Partners. To the extent the Partnership’s net income in any year exceeds net cash from operations, it will be allocated 99% to the limited partners and 1% to the General Partners.

Net loss, depreciation, and amortization deductions for each fiscal year will be allocated as follows: (a) 99% to the limited partners holding Class B units and 1% to the General Partners until their capital accounts are reduced to zero, (b) then to any partner having a positive balance in his/her capital account in an amount not to exceed such positive balance, and (c) thereafter to the General Partners.

Gain on the sale or exchange of the Partnership’s properties will be allocated generally in the same manner that the net proceeds from such sale are distributed to partners after the following allocations are made, if applicable: (i) allocations made pursuant to the qualified income offset provisions of the partnership agreement, (ii) allocations to partners having negative capital accounts until all negative capital accounts have been restored to zero, and (iii) allocations to limited partners holding Class B units in amounts equal to the deductions for depreciation and amortization previously allocated to them with respect to the specific Partnership property sold, but not in excess of the amount of gain on sale recognized by the Partnership with respect to the sale of such property.

(d) Distributions of Net Cash From Operations

Cash available for distribution, as defined by the partnership agreement, is distributed to the limited partners quarterly. In accordance with the partnership agreement, such distributions are paid first to limited partners holding Class A units until they have received a 10% per annum return on their net Capital Contributions, as defined. Then, such distributions are paid to the General Partners until they have received 10% of the total amount distributed to date Any remaining cash available for distribution is split between the limited partners holding Class A units and the General Partners on a basis of 90% and 10%, respectively. No cash distributions will be made to the limited partners holding Class B units.

(e) Distribution of Sales Proceeds

Upon sales of properties, the net sales proceeds will be distributed in the following order:

9

Table of Contents

2.    INVESTMENT IN JOINT VENTURES

(a) Basis of Presentation

The Partnership owned interests in nine properties as of June 30, 2003 through its ownership in the Joint Ventures. The Partnership does not have control over the operations of the Joint Ventures; however, it does exercise significant influence. Accordingly, the Partnership’s investments in the Joint Ventures are recorded using the equity method of accounting, whereby original investments are recorded at cost and subsequently adjusted for contributions, distributions, and net income (loss) attributable to the Partnership. For further information regarding investments in Joint Ventures, see the report filed for the Partnership on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002.

(b) Summary of Operations

The following information summarizes the operations of the unconsolidated Joint Ventures in which the Partnership held ownership interests for the three months and six months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002:

10

Table of Contents

The following information summarizes the operations of the Fund VIII-IX-REIT Associates in which the Partnership held an interest through its interest in Fund VIII-Fund IX Associates for the three months and six months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002:

3.    RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

In January 2003, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Interpretation No. 46 (FIN 46), “Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities,” which clarifies the application of Accounting Research Bulletin (ARB) No. 51, “Consolidated Financial Statements,” relating to consolidation of certain entities. FIN 46 requires the identification of the Partnership’s participation in variable interest entities (“VIEs”), which are defined as entities with a level of invested equity that is not sufficient to fund future activities to permit them to operate on a stand-alone basis, or whose equity holders lack certain characteristics of a controlling financial interest. For entities identified as VIEs, FIN 46 sets forth a model to evaluate potential consolidation based on an assessment of which party to the VIE, if any, bears a majority of the exposure to its expected losses, or stands to gain from a majority of its expected returns. FIN 46 is effective for all new VIEs created or acquired after January 31, 2003. For VIEs created or acquired prior to February 1, 2003, the provisions of FIN 46 must be applied for the first interim or annual period beginning after June 15, 2003. FIN 46 also sets forth certain disclosures regarding interests in VIEs that are deemed significant, even if consolidation is not required. As the Joint Ventures do not fall under the definition of VIEs provided above, the Partnership does not believe that the adoption of FIN 46 will result in the consolidation of any previously unconsolidated entities.

In August 2001, SFAS No. 144, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets” (effective beginning January 1, 2002) was issued. SFAS No. 144 addresses financial accounting and reporting for the impairment of long-lived assets and for long-lived assets to be disposed of and supersedes SFAS No. 121, “Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to be Disposed of.” Among other factors, SFAS No. 144 establishes criteria beyond that previously specified in SFAS No. 121 to determine when a long-lived asset is to be considered held for sale. We believe that the adoption of SFAS No. 144 will not have a significant impact on the Partnership’s financial statements.

4.    RELATED-PARTY TRANSACTIONS

(a) Management and Leasing Fees

The Partnership entered into a property management and leasing agreement with Wells Management, Inc. (“Wells Management”), an affiliate of the General Partners. In consideration for supervising the management of

11

Table of Contents

properties, such properties will generally pay Wells Management management and leasing fees equal to (a) 3% of the gross revenues for management and 3% of the gross revenues for leasing (aggregate maximum of 6%) plus a separate fee for the one-time initial lease-up of newly constructed properties in an amount not to exceed the fee customarily charged in arm’s-length transactions by others rendering similar services in the same geographic area for similar properties or (b) in the case of commercial properties which are leased on a long-term net basis (ten or more years), 1% of the gross revenues, except for initial leasing fees equal to 3% of the gross revenues over the first five years of the lease term. The properties in which the Partnership owns interests paid management and leasing fees to Wells Management of $123,043 and $119,486 for the three months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002, respectively, and $236,611 and $236,218 for the six months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002, respectively.

(b) Administration Reimbursements

Wells Capital, Inc. performs certain administrative services for the Partnership, such as accounting, property management and other partnership administration, and incurs the related expenses. Such expenses are allocated among the various Wells Real Estate Funds based on time spent on each fund by individual administrative personnel. The Partnership reimbursed $14,504 and $10,176 for the three months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002, respectively, and $30,123 and $18,999 for the six months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002, respectively, to Wells Capital, Inc. and its affiliates for these services. The Joint Ventures reimbursed $44,856 and $34,607 for the three months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002, respectively, and $85,708 and $75,830 for the six months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002, respectively, to Wells Capital, Inc. and its affiliates for these services and expenses.

(c) Conflicts of Interest

The General Partners are also general partners of other Wells Real Estate Funds. As such, there may exist conflicts of interest where the General Partners in their capacity as general partners of other Wells Real Estate Funds may be in competition with the Partnership in connection with property acquisitions or for tenants in similar geographic markets.

ITEM 2.    MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITIONS AND

RESULTS OF OPERATION.

The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the accompanying financial statements and notes thereto.

(a) Forward-Looking Statements

This report contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, including discussion and analysis of the financial condition of the Partnership, anticipated capital expenditures required to complete certain projects, amounts of cash distributions anticipated to be distributed to limited partners in the future, and certain other matters. Readers of this Report should be aware that there are various factors that may cause actual results to differ materially from any forward-looking statements made in this report, including construction costs which may exceed estimates, construction delays, lease-up risks, inability to obtain new tenants upon the expiration of existing leases, and the potential need to fund tenant improvements or other capital expenditures out of operating cash flows.

(b) Results of Operations

Gross Revenues

Gross revenues of the Partnership decreased to $399,360 for the three months ended June 30, 2003 from $418,900 for the three months ended June 30, 2002, and $773,964 for the six months ended June 30, 2003 from $807,049 for the six months ended June 30, 2002, primarily due to the corresponding decrease in equity in income of Joint Ventures described below.

12

Table of Contents

Equity In Income of Joint Ventures

Gross Revenues of Joint Ventures

Gross revenues of the Joint Ventures declined in 2003, as compared to 2002. The decrease in such gross revenues is primarily the result of a 22% decline in occupancy of the 360 Interlocken Building; however, it is partially offset by adjustments to 2002 operating expense reimbursement billings to tenants of the US Cellular Building, which were recorded in the first quarter of 2003. Tenants are billed for operating expense reimbursements based on estimates, which are reconciled in the following calendar year based on actual costs incurred and the terms of the corresponding tenant leases.

The decline described above is partially offset by an increase in gross revenues recognized by Fund VIII-Fund IX Associates due to 2002 operating expense reimbursement billing adjustments for tenants of the US Cellular Building, which were recorded during the second quarter of 2003.

Expenses of Joint Ventures

The expenses of the Joint Ventures increased in 2003, as compared to 2002, primarily due to increases in: (i) HVAC and roof repair costs for the US Cellular Building and the Quest Building; (ii) property taxes for the Interlocken Building; (iii) a one-time increase in accounting fees incurred as a result of changing independent accountants in 2002; and (iv) administrative salaries.

Expenses

Expenses of the Partnership were $60,685 and $45,415 for the three months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002, respectively, and $90,883 and $68,525 for the six months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002, respectively. These increases resulted primarily from additional: (1) Tennessee partnership franchise and excise tax invoices received in the second quarter of 2003 in order to reconcile estimated to actual amounts due for 2002, and (2) an increase in administrative costs incurred partially in response to new regulatory requirements. We anticipate additional increases related to the implementation of the new reporting regulations during the second half of 2003.

Net Income

As a result, net income of the Partnership was $338,675 and $373,485 for the three months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002, respectively, and $683,081 and $738,524 for the six months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002, respectively.

(c) Liquidity and Capital Resources

Cash Flows From Operating Activities

Net cash flows from operating activities were $(90,173) for the six months ended June 30, 2003, as compared to $(69,727) for the six months ended June 30, 2002, primarily due to the increase in partnership administration costs described in the previous section.

Cash Flows From Investing Activities

Net cash flows from investing activities decreased to $1,351,957 for the six months ended June 30, 2003, as compared to $1,476,713 for the six months ended June 30, 2002. The 2003 decrease from 2002 is largely attributable to the decline in occupancy at the 360 Interlocken Building.

Cash Flows From Financing Activities

Net cash flows from financing activities were $(1,366,784) and $(1,451,388) for the six months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002, respectively. The 2003 decrease in financing cash flows used from 2002 is primarily attributable to the decline in distributions paid to partners holding Class A units as a result of receiving less distributions from Joint Ventures for the reasons described in the previous sections.

Distributions

The Partnership declared distributions to the limited partners holding Class A units of $0.20 per unit, $0.22 per unit for the quarters ended June 30, 2003 and 2002, respectively. Such distributions have been made from net cash from operations and distributions received from investments in Joint Ventures. Distributions accrued for the second quarter of 2003 to the limited partners holding Class A Units were paid in August 2003. No cash distributions were made to limited partners holding Class B Units.

13

Table of Contents

Capital Resources

The Partnership is an investment vehicle formed for the purpose of acquiring, owning, and operating income-producing real properties. Other than investor proceeds of $25,507, the Partnership has invested all of its funds available for investment in properties. Accordingly, the General Partners anticipate investing the remaining investor proceeds in capital projects for its existing property investments and do not intend to acquire interests in additional properties. Through the expiration of the lease term on November 30, 2007, Alstom Power has the right to request tenant improvements up to $245,000 to be funded by Fund IX-X-XI-REIT Associates. Fund IX-X-XI-REIT Associates has not received a request to utilize any such funds to date. Other than those aforementioned, the General Partners are unaware of any specific need requiring capital resources.

(d) Related-Party Transactions

The Partnership and its Joint Ventures have entered into agreements with Wells Capital, Inc., the General Partner of Wells Partners, L.P. and its affiliates, whereby the Partnership or its Joint Ventures pay certain fees or reimbursements to Wells Capital, Inc. or its affiliates (e.g., property management and leasing fees, administrative salary reimbursements, etc.). See Note 4 to the Partnership’s financial statements included in this report for a discussion of the various related party transactions, agreements, and fees.

(e) Inflation

The real estate market has not been affected significantly by inflation in the past three years due to the relatively low inflation rate. However, there are provisions in the majority of tenant leases, which would protect the Partnership from the impact of inflation. These provisions include reimbursement billings for operating expense pass-through charges, real estate tax and insurance reimbursements on a per-square-foot basis, or in some cases, annual reimbursement of operating expenses above a certain per-square-foot allowance. There is no assurance, however, that the Partnership would be able to replace existing leases with new leases at higher base rental rates.

(f) Application of Critical Accounting Policies

The Partnership’s accounting policies have been established to conform with GAAP. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to use judgment in the application of accounting policies, including making estimates and assumptions. These judgments affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the dates of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting periods. If management’s judgment or interpretation of the facts and circumstances relating to various transactions had been different, it is possible that different accounting policies would have been applied, thus, resulting in a different presentation of the financial statements. Additionally, other companies may utilize different estimates that may impact comparability of the Partnership’s results of operations to those of companies in similar businesses.

Below is a discussion of the accounting policies that management considers to be critical in that they may require complex judgment in their application or require estimates about matters that are inherently uncertain.

Investment in Real Estate Assets

Management is required to make subjective assessments as to the useful lives of its depreciable assets. Management considers the period of future benefit of the asset to determine the appropriate useful lives. These assessments have a direct impact on net income. The estimated useful lives of the Joint Venture’s assets by class are as follows:

14

Table of Contents

In the event that management uses inappropriate useful lives or methods for depreciation, the Partnership’s net income would be misstated.

Valuation of Real Estate Assets

Management continually monitors events and changes in circumstances that could indicate that the carrying amounts of the real estate assets in which the Partnership has an ownership interest, either directly or through investments in Joint Ventures, may not be recoverable. When indicators of potential impairment are present which indicate that the carrying amounts of real estate assets may not be recoverable, management assesses the recoverability of the real estate assets by determining whether the carrying value of the real estate assets will be recovered through the undiscounted future operating cash flows expected from the use of the asset and its eventual disposition. In the event that such expected undiscounted future cash flows do not exceed the carrying value, management adjusts the real estate assets to the fair value and recognizes an impairment loss. Management has determined that there has been no impairment in the carrying value of real estate assets held by the Partnership to date.

Projections of expected future cash flows requires management to estimate future market rental income amounts subsequent to the expiration of current lease agreements, property operating expenses, discount rates, the number of months it takes to re-lease the property, and the number of years the property is held for investment. The use of inappropriate assumptions in the future cash flow analysis would result in an incorrect assessment of the property’s future cash flows and fair value, and could result in the overstatement of the carrying value of real estate assets held by the Joint Ventures and net income of the Partnership.

ITEM 3.    QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISKS

Since the Partnership does not borrow any money, make any foreign investments or invest in any market risk-sensitive instruments, it is not subject to risks relating to interest rates, foreign current exchange rate fluctuations, or the other market risks contemplated by Item 305 of Regulation S-K.

ITEM 4.    CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

The Partnership carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of management of Wells Capital, Inc., the corporate general partner of one of the General Partners of the Partnership, including the Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Partnership’s disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Based upon that evaluation, the Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer concluded that the Partnership’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective.

There were no significant changes in the Partnership’s internal controls over financial reporting that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting.

15

Table of Contents

PART II.    OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 6.    EXHIBITS AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

16

Table of Contents

EXHIBIT INDEX

TO

SECOND QUARTER FORM 10-Q

OF

WELLS REAL ESTATE FUND IX, L.P.

17