UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark one)
x | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2003
Commission File Number 000-24051
UNITED PANAM FINANCIAL CORP.
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
California | 94-3211687 | |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |
(I.R.S. Employer Identification Number) |
3990 Westerly Place, Suite 200
Newport Beach, CA 92660
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
(949) 224-1917
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No x
The number of shares outstanding of the Registrants Common Stock as of July 31, 2003 was 15,886,332
UNITED PANAM FINANCIAL CORP.
FORM 10-Q
JUNE 30, 2003
Page | ||||
PART I. |
FINANCIAL INFORMATION |
|||
Item 1. |
Financial Statements (unaudited) |
|||
Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition as of June 30, 2003 and December 31, 2002 |
1 | |||
2 | ||||
3 | ||||
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the six months ended June 30, 2003 and June 30, 2002 |
4 | |||
6 | ||||
Item 2. |
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
10 | ||
Item 3. |
25 | |||
Item 4. |
25 | |||
PART II. |
OTHER INFORMATION |
|||
Item 1. |
26 | |||
Item 2. |
26 | |||
Item 3. |
26 | |||
Item 4. |
26 | |||
Item 5. |
26 | |||
Item 6. |
26 |
PART I. | FINANCIAL INFORMATION |
Item 1. | Financial Statements. |
United PanAm Financial Corp. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except share and per share data) | June 30, 2003 |
December 31, 2002 |
||||||
Assets |
||||||||
Cash and due from banks |
$ | 7,334 | $ | 9,964 | ||||
Short term investments |
24,768 | 3,590 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
32,102 | 13,554 | ||||||
Securities available for sale, at fair value |
916,054 | 603,268 | ||||||
Loans |
395,810 | 331,257 | ||||||
Less unearned discount |
(8,462 | ) | | |||||
Less allowance for loan losses |
(16,854 | ) | (23,179 | ) | ||||
Loans, net |
370,494 | 308,078 | ||||||
Premises and equipment, net |
2,807 | 2,700 | ||||||
Federal Home Loan Bank stock, at cost |
9,587 | 1,675 | ||||||
Accrued interest receivable |
1,606 | 1,880 | ||||||
Other assets |
16,772 | 20,131 | ||||||
Total assets |
$ | 1,349,422 | $ | 951,286 | ||||
Liabilities and Shareholders Equity |
||||||||
Deposits |
$ | 468,807 | $ | 468,458 | ||||
Repurchase agreements |
778,834 | 384,624 | ||||||
Accrued expenses and other liabilities |
4,385 | 8,545 | ||||||
Total liabilities |
1,252,026 | 861,627 | ||||||
Common stock (no par value): |
||||||||
Authorized, 30,000,000 shares Issued and outstanding, 15,881,306 shares at June 30, 2003 and 15,836,725 December 31, 2002 |
65,012 | 64,957 | ||||||
Retained earnings |
31,830 | 23,814 | ||||||
Unrealized gain on securities available for sale, net |
554 | 888 | ||||||
Total shareholders equity |
97,396 | 89,659 | ||||||
Total liabilities and shareholders equity |
$ | 1,349,422 | $ | 951,286 | ||||
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
1
United PanAm Financial Corp. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Operations
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except per share data) | Three Months Ended June 30, |
Six Months Ended June 30, | ||||||||||
2003 |
2002 |
2003 |
2002 | |||||||||
Interest Income |
||||||||||||
Loans |
$ | 19,973 | $ | 14,081 | $ | 36,776 | $ | 27,115 | ||||
Securities |
4,116 | 3,124 | 7,830 | 5,782 | ||||||||
Total interest income |
24,089 | 17,205 | 44,606 | 32,897 | ||||||||
Interest Expense |
||||||||||||
Deposits |
3,544 | 3,115 | 7,236 | 6,348 | ||||||||
Federal Home Loan Bank advances |
| 215 | | 784 | ||||||||
Repurchase agreements |
2,261 | 1,107 | 3,857 | 1,300 | ||||||||
Total interest expense |
5,805 | 4,437 | 11,093 | 8,432 | ||||||||
Net interest income |
18,284 | 12,768 | 33,513 | 24,465 | ||||||||
Provision for loan losses |
2,095 | 99 | 2,630 | 183 | ||||||||
Net interest income after provision for loan losses |
16,189 | 12,669 | 30,883 | 24,282 | ||||||||
Non-interest Income |
||||||||||||
Net gain on sale of securities |
315 | | 315 | 61 | ||||||||
Service charges and fees |
217 | 197 | 447 | 388 | ||||||||
Loan related charges and fees |
69 | 71 | 161 | 156 | ||||||||
Other income |
170 | 32 | 1,069 | 61 | ||||||||
Total non-interest income |
771 | 300 | 1,992 | 666 | ||||||||
Non-interest Expense |
||||||||||||
Compensation and benefits |
6,477 | 4,971 | 12,488 | 9,780 | ||||||||
Occupancy |
1,107 | 895 | 2,138 | 1,770 | ||||||||
Other |
2,512 | 2,126 | 4,792 | 4,322 | ||||||||
Total non-interest expense |
10,096 | 7,992 | 19,418 | 15,872 | ||||||||
Income before income taxes and cumulative effect of change in accounting principle |
6,864 | 4,977 | 13,457 | 9,076 | ||||||||
Income taxes |
2,758 | 1,953 | 5,441 | 3,492 | ||||||||
Income before cumulative effect of change in accounting principle |
4,106 | 3,024 | 8,016 | 5,584 | ||||||||
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle net of tax |
| | | 106 | ||||||||
Net income |
$ | 4,106 | $ | 3,024 | 8,016 | 5,690 | ||||||
Earnings per share-basic: |
||||||||||||
Income before cumulative effect of change in accounting principle |
$ | 0.26 | $ | 0.19 | $ | 0.51 | $ | 0.36 | ||||
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle |
$ | | $ | | $ | | $ | 0.01 | ||||
Net income |
$ | 0.26 | $ | 0.19 | $ | 0.51 | $ | 0.37 | ||||
Weighted average shares outstanding |
15,877 | 15,571 | 15,872 | 15,571 | ||||||||
Earnings per share-diluted: |
||||||||||||
Income before cumulative effect of change in accounting principle |
$ | 0.23 | $ | 0.17 | $ | 0.45 | $ | 0.32 | ||||
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle |
$ | | $ | | $ | | $ | 0.01 | ||||
Net income |
$ | 0.23 | $ | 0.17 | $ | 0.45 | $ | 0.33 | ||||
Weighted average shares outstanding |
18,148 | 17,626 | 17,887 | 17,500 | ||||||||
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements
2
United PanAm Financial Corp. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income
(Unaudited)
(Dollars in thousands) | Three Months Ended June 30, |
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|||||||||||||
2003 |
2002 |
2003 |
2002 |
||||||||||||
Net income |
$ | 4,106 | $ | 3,024 | $ | 8,016 | $ | 5,690 | |||||||
Other comprehensive income, net of tax: |
|||||||||||||||
Unrealized gain (loss) on securities available for sale |
(70 | ) | 254 | (334 | ) | (308 | ) | ||||||||
Comprehensive income |
$ | 4,036 | $ | 3,278 | $ | 7,682 | $ | 5,382 | |||||||
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements
3
United PanAm Financial Corp. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(Unaudited)
(Dollars in thousands) | Six Months Ended June 30, |
|||||||
2003 |
2002 |
|||||||
Cash Flows from Operating Activities |
||||||||
Net income |
$ | 8,016 | $ | 5,690 | ||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: |
||||||||
Gain on sale of securities |
(315 | ) | (61 | ) | ||||
Provision for loan losses |
2,630 | 183 | ||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
533 | 425 | ||||||
FHLB stock dividend |
| (81 | ) | |||||
Decrease (increase) in accrued interest receivable and other assets |
(1,106 | ) | 2,504 | |||||
Decrease in deferred tax asset |
4,961 | 4,994 | ||||||
Decrease in accrued expenses and other liabilities |
(4,159 | ) | (3,846 | ) | ||||
Amortization of premiums (discounts) on securities |
2,024 | 2,598 | ||||||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
12,584 | 12,406 | ||||||
Cash Flows from Investing Activities |
||||||||
Proceeds from maturities of investment securities |
374,579 | 188,844 | ||||||
Purchase of investment securities |
(700,261 | ) | (394,052 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from sales of securities |
10,630 | 30,007 | ||||||
Repayments of mortgage loans |
| 74 | ||||||
Originations and purchases, net of repayments, of non-mortgage loans |
(65,046 | ) | (39,546 | ) | ||||
Purchase of premises and equipment |
(640 | ) | (650 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from sale (purchase) of FHLB stock, net |
(7,912 | ) | 601 | |||||
Net cash used in investing activities |
(388,650 | ) | (214,722 | ) | ||||
Cash Flows from Financing Activities |
||||||||
Issuance of capital stock |
55 | | ||||||
Net (decrease) increase in deposits |
349 | (6,115 | ) | |||||
Repayment, net of proceeds, from FHLB advances |
| (100,000 | ) | |||||
Proceeds, net of repayments, from repurchase agreements |
394,210 | 212,113 | ||||||
Net cash provided by financing activities |
394,614 | 105,998 | ||||||
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents |
18,548 | (96,318 | ) | |||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
13,554 | 140,695 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
$ | 32,102 | $ | 44,377 | ||||
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements
4
United PanAm Financial Corp. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, Continued
(Unaudited)
(Dollars in thousands) | Six Months Ended June 30, | |||||
2003 |
2002 | |||||
Supplemental Disclosures of Cash Flow Information |
||||||
Cash paid for: |
||||||
Interest |
$ | 11,367 | $ | 8,682 | ||
Income Taxes |
$ | 5,200 | $ | 798 | ||
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements
5
United PanAm Financial Corp. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2003 and 2002
(Unaudited)
1. | Organization |
United PanAm Financial Corp. (the Company) was incorporated in California on April 9, 1998 for the purpose of reincorporating its business in California, through the merger of United PanAm Financial Corp., a Delaware corporation (the Predecessor), into the Company. Unless the context indicates otherwise, all references herein to the Company include the Predecessor. The Company was originally organized as a holding company for Pan American Financial, Inc. (PAFI) and Pan American Bank, FSB (the Bank) to purchase certain assets and assume certain liabilities of Pan American Federal Savings Bank from the Resolution Trust Corporation (the RTC) on April 29, 1994. The Company, PAFI and the Bank are considered to be Hispanic owned. PAFI is a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, and the Bank is a wholly owned subsidiary of PAFI.
2. | Basis of Presentation |
The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements include the accounts of United PanAm Financial Corp., Pan American Financial, Inc. and Pan American Bank, FSB. Substantially all of the Companys revenues are derived from the operations of the Bank and they represent substantially all of the Companys consolidated assets and liabilities as of June 30, 2003 and December 31, 2002. Significant inter-company accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
These consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP) for interim financial information and the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by GAAP for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for a fair presentation of the Companys financial condition and results of operations for the interim periods presented in this Form 10-Q have been included. Operating results for the interim periods are not necessarily indicative of financial results for the full year. These unaudited consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002.
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
6
3. | Earnings Per Share |
Basic EPS and diluted EPS are calculated as follows for the three and six months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002:
(In thousands, except per share amounts) | Three Months Ended June 30, |
Six Months Ended June 30, | ||||||||||
2003 |
2002 |
2003 |
2002 | |||||||||
Earnings per sharebasic: |
||||||||||||
Income before cumulative effect of change in accounting principle |
$ | 4,106 | $ | 3,024 | $ | 8,016 | $ | 5,584 | ||||
Net Income |
$ | 4,106 | $ | 3,024 | $ | 8,016 | $ | 5,690 | ||||
Average common shares outstanding |
15,877 | 15,571 | 15,872 | 15,571 | ||||||||
Per share before cumulative effect of change in accounting principle |
$ | 0.26 | $ | 0.19 | $ | 0.51 | $ | 0.36 | ||||
Earnings per share |
$ | 0.26 | $ | 0.19 | $ | 0.51 | $ | 0.37 | ||||
Earnings per sharediluted: |
||||||||||||
Income before cumulative effect of change in accounting principle |
$ | 4,106 | $ | 3,024 | $ | 8,016 | $ | 5,584 | ||||
Net Income |
$ | 4,106 | $ | 3,024 | $ | 8,016 | $ | 5.690 | ||||
Average common shares outstanding |
15,877 | 15.571 | 15,872 | 15,157 | ||||||||
Add: Stock options |
2,271 | 2,055 | 2,015 | 1,929 | ||||||||
Average common shares outstandingdiluted |
18,148 | 17,626 | 17,887 | 17,500 | ||||||||
Per share before cumulative effect of change in accounting principle |
$ | 0.23 | $ | 0.17 | $ | 0.45 | $ | 0.32 | ||||
Earnings per share |
$ | 0.23 | $ | 0.17 | $ | 0.45 | $ | 0.33 | ||||
4. | Stock-Based Compensation |
At June 30, 2003 and 2002, the Company has issued stock options to certain of its employees and directors. The Company accounts for these options under the recognition and measurement principles of APB Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock issued to Employees, and related Interpretations. No stock-based employee compensation cost is reflected in net income, as all options granted had an exercise price equal to or greater than the market value of the underlying common stock on the date of grant. Had compensation cost for the Companys stock option plan been determined based on the fair value consistent with the Provisions of SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, the Companys net income and income per share would have been reduced to the pro forma amounts indicated below for the three months and six months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002:
(In thousands, except per share amounts) | Three Months Ended June 30, |
Six Months Ended June 30, | ||||||||||
2003 |
2002 |
2003 |
2002 | |||||||||
Net Income as reported |
$ | 4,106 | $ | 3,024 | $ | 8,016 | $ | 5,690 | ||||
Deduct: Total stock based employee compensation expense determined under fair value based method for all awards |
$ | 277 | $ | 61 | $ | 537 | $ | 121 | ||||
Net Incomepro forma |
$ | 3,829 | $ | 2,963 | $ | 7,479 | $ | 5,569 | ||||
Net Income per share as reportedbasic |
$ | 0.26 | $ | 0.19 | $ | 0.51 | $ | 0.37 | ||||
Net Income per sharepro formabasic |
$ | 0.24 | $ | 0.19 | $ | 0.47 | $ | 0.36 | ||||
Net Income per share as reported fully diluted |
$ | 0.23 | $ | 0.17 | $ | 0.45 | $ | 0.33 | ||||
Net Income per sharepro formafully diluted |
$ | 0.21 | $ | 0.17 | $ | 0.42 | $ | 0.32 | ||||
5. | Allowance for Loan Losses |
Prior to January 1, 2003, the Companys allowance for loan losses was increased by its allocation of acquisition discounts and a purchase accounting adjustment to the allowance for loan losses. At December 31, 2002, the Company was allocating 11.5% of the net loan amount of all new auto loans to allowance for loan losses.
Effective January 1, 2003, after consultation with the OTS, the Bank has elected to allocate the purchase price entirely to auto contracts and unearned discount at the date of purchase. The unearned discount will be accreted as an adjustment to yield over the life of the contract. An allowance for loan losses will be established through provisions for losses recorded in income as necessary to provide for estimated contract losses (net of remaining unearned income) at each reporting date. Management expects that current and future results will reflect higher yields and provisions for loan losses being recorded from purchased auto contracts.
7
The total allowance for loan losses was $16.9 million at June 30, 2003 compared with $20.5 million at June 30, 2002, representing 4.26% of loans at June 30, 2003 and 6.91% at June 30, 2002. Additionally, unearned discounts on loans totaled $8.5 million at June 30, 2003 compared with zero at June 30, 2002, representing 2.14% of loans at June 30, 2003.
Effective January 1, 2003, an allowance for loan losses is established for all new loans based on losses incurred in the portfolio as of the statement date as opposed to estimated losses over the remaining life of the loan.
6. | Recent Accounting Developments |
Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities
In January 2003, the FASB issued Interpretation 46, Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities an interpretation of ARB No. 51 (FIN 46), which requires a variable interest entity to be consolidated by a company if that company is subject to a majority of the risk of loss from the variable interest entitys activities or is entitled to receive a majority of the entitys residual returns or both. Prior to FIN 46, a company included another entity in its consolidated financial statements only if it controlled the entity through voting interests. FIN 46 also requires disclosures about variable interest entities that the company is not required to consolidate but in which it has a significant variable interest. The consolidated requirements of FIN 46 apply immediately to variable interest entities created after January 31, 2003. The consolidated requirements apply to older entities in the first fiscal year or interim period after June 15, 2003. Certain disclosure requirements apply in all financial statements issued after January 31, 2003, regardless of when the variable interest entity was established. Management does not expect the adoption of FIN 46 to have a material impact on the Companys financial statements.
Amendment of FASB Statement 133
On April 30, 2003, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 149, Amendment of Statement 133 on Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities (FAS 149). The purpose of FAS 149 is to amend and clarify financial accounting and reporting for derivative instruments and hedging activities under Statement 133. FAS 149 amends Statement 133 for decisions made:
| As part of the Derivatives Implementation Group (DIG) process that require amendment to Statement 133, |
| In connection with other FASB projects dealing with financial instruments, and |
| In connection with the implementation issues raised related to the application of the definition of a derivative. |
These amendments clarify the definition of a derivative, expand the nature of exemptions from Statement 133, clarify the application of hedge accounting when using certain instruments, clarify the application of paragraph 13 of Statement 133 to embedded derivative instruments in which the underlying is an interest rate, and modify the cash flow presentation of derivative instruments that contain financing elements. Certain DIG issues, once approved, required amendment to Statement 133. These amendments are reflected in FAS 149. Certain other DIG issues have been amended by FAS 149. FAS 149 is effective for derivative transactions and hedging relationships entered into or modified after June 30, 2003. Management does not expect the adoption of FAS 149 to have a material impact on the Companys financial statements.
8
Financial Instruments with Characteristics of Liabilities and Equity
On May 15, 2003, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 150, Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Characteristics of Both Liabilities and Equity (FAS 150). FAS 150 requires issuers to classify as liabilities (or assets in some circumstances) three classes of freestanding financial instruments that embody obligations for the issue.
Generally, FAS 150 is effective for financial instruments entered into or modified after May 31, 2003 and is otherwise effective at the beginning of the first interim period beginning after June 15, 2003. The Company adopted the provisions of FAS 150 on July 1, 2003. The Company does not expect the adoption of FAS 150 to have a material impact on the Companys financial statements.
7. | Operating Segments |
The Company has three reportable segments: auto finance, insurance premium finance and banking. The auto finance segment acquires, holds for investment and services nonprime retail automobile installment sales contracts generated by franchised and independent dealers of used automobiles. The insurance premium finance segment, through a contractual agreement, underwrites and finances automobile and commercial insurance premiums in California. The banking segment operates a four-branch federal savings bank and is the principal funding source for the Companys auto and insurance premium finance segments.
The accounting policies of the segments are the same as those of the Companys except for funds provided by the banking segment to the other operating segments which are accounted for at a predetermined transfer price (including certain overhead costs).
The Companys reportable segments are strategic business units that offer different products and services. They are managed and reported upon separately within the Company.
At or For Three Months Ended June 30, 2003 | ||||||||||||
(In thousands) | Auto Finance |
Insurance Premium Finance |
Banking |
Total | ||||||||
Net interest income |
$ | 16,013 | $ | 598 | $ | 1,673 | $ | 18,284 | ||||
Provision for loan losses |
2,032 | 63 | | 2,095 | ||||||||
Non-interest income |
105 | 129 | 537 | 771 | ||||||||
Non-interest expense |
8,331 | 57 | 1,708 | 10,096 | ||||||||
Segment profit, pre-tax |
$ | 5,755 | $ | 607 | $ | 502 | $ | 6,864 | ||||
Total assets |
$ | 335,163 | $ | 39,716 | $ | 974,543 | $ | 1,349,422 | ||||
At or For Three Months Ended June 30, 2002 | ||||||||||||
(In thousands) | Auto Finance |
Insurance Premium Finance |
Banking |
Total | ||||||||
Net interest income |
$ | 9,579 | $ | 603 | $ | 2,586 | $ | 12,768 | ||||
Provision for loan losses |
| 99 | | 99 | ||||||||
Non-interest income |
88 | 139 | 73 | 300 | ||||||||
Non-interest expense |
6,381 | 55 | 1,556 | 7,992 | ||||||||
Segment profit (loss), pre-tax |
$ | 3,286 | $ | 588 | $ | 1,103 | $ | 4,977 | ||||
Total assets |
$ | 239,521 | $ | 41,906 | $ | 515,680 | $ | 797,107 | ||||
9
At or For Six Months Ended June 30, 2003 | |||||||||||||
(In thousands) | Auto Finance |
Insurance Premium Finance |
Banking |
Total | |||||||||
Net interest income |
$ | 29,265 | $ | 1,220 | $ | 3,028 | $ | 33,513 | |||||
Provision for loan losses |
2,769 | (139 | ) | | 2,630 | ||||||||
Non-interest income |
227 | 255 | 1,510 | 1,992 | |||||||||
Non-interest expense |
15,962 | 111 | 3,345 | 19,418 | |||||||||
Segment profit, pre-tax |
$ | 10,761 | $ | 1,503 | $ | 1,193 | $ | 13,457 | |||||
Total assets |
$ | 335,163 | $ | 39,716 | $ | 974,543 | $ | 1,349,422 | |||||
At or For Six Months Ended June 30, 2002 | |||||||||||||
(In thousands) | Auto Finance |
Insurance Premium Finance |
Banking |
Total | |||||||||
Net interest income |
$ | 18,510 | $ | 1,143 | $ | 4,812 | $ | 24,465 | |||||
Provision for loan losses |
| 183 | | 183 | |||||||||
Non-interest income |
183 | 271 | 212 | 666 | |||||||||
Non-interest expense |
12,316 | 105 | 3,451 | 15,872 | |||||||||
Segment profit (loss), pre-tax |
$ | 6,377 | $ | 1,126 | $ | 1,573 | $ | 9,076 | |||||
Total assets |
$ | 239,521 | $ | 41,906 | $ | 515,680 | $ | 797,107 | |||||
During 2002, funds provided to the Companys auto and insurance premium finance segments were charged utilizing a fixed 7.00% transfer rate. During 2003 the transfer rate was adjusted to 4.6% to reflect the expected cost of borrowings and operations at the banking segment. If the funds had been transferred in 2002 on this same basis, the transfer rate utilized would have been 5.5% and the segment reporting would have been as follows:
Proforma At or For Three Months Ended June 30, 2002 | ||||||||||||
Auto Finance |
Insurance Premium Finance |
Banking |
Total | |||||||||
Net interest income |
$ | 9,741 | $ | 642 | $ | 2,385 | $ | 12,768 | ||||
Provision for loan losses |
| 99 | | 99 | ||||||||
Non-interest income |
88 | 139 | 73 | 300 | ||||||||
Non-interest expense |
6,381 | 55 | 1,556 | 7,992 | ||||||||
Segment profit, pre-tax |
$ | 3,448 | $ | 627 | $ | 902 | $ | 4,977 | ||||
Total assets |
$ | 239,521 | $ | 41,906 | $ | 515,680 | $ | 797,107 | ||||
Proforma At or For Six Months Ended June 30, 2002 | ||||||||||||
Auto Finance |
Insurance Premium Finance |
Banking |
Total | |||||||||
Net interest income |
$ | 19,130 | $ | 1,296 | $ | 4,039 | $ | 24,465 | ||||
Provision for loan losses |
| 183 | | 183 | ||||||||
Non-interest income |
183 | 271 | 212 | 666 | ||||||||
Non-interest expense |
12,316 | 105 | 3,451 | 15,872 | ||||||||
Segment profit, pre-tax |
$ | 6,997 | $ | 1,279 | $ | 800 | $ | 9,076 | ||||
Total assets |
$ | 239,521 | $ | 41,906 | $ | 515,680 | $ | 797,107 | ||||
For the reportable segment information presented, substantially all expenses are recorded directly to each industry segment.
Item 2. | Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations. |
Certain statements in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, including statements regarding United PanAm Financial Corp.s (the Company) strategies, plans, objectives, expectations and intentions, may include forward-looking information within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. These forward-looking statements involve certain risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied in such forward-looking statements. Such risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to, the following factors: loans we made to credit-impaired borrowers; our need for additional sources of financing; concentration of the bank business in California; reliance on operational systems and controls
10
and key employees; competitive pressure we face in the banking industry; changes in the interest rate environment; rapid growth of our businesses; general economic conditions; the Banks continuing qualification as a qualified thrift lender; and other risks, some of which may be identified from time to time in our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC).
General
The Company
The Company is a specialty finance company engaged primarily in originating and acquiring retail automobile installment sales contracts and insurance premium finance contracts financed by retail bank deposits. The Company markets to customers who generally cannot obtain financing from traditional lenders. These customers usually pay higher interest rates than those charged by traditional lenders to gain access to consumer financing. The Company has funded its operations to date principally through retail deposits, brokered deposits, Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) advances, and commercial repurchase agreements. The Company is a holding company for Pan American Bank, FSB, a federally chartered savings association (the Bank).
The Company commenced operations in 1994 by purchasing from the Resolution Trust Corporation (RTC) certain assets and assuming certain liabilities of the Banks predecessor, Pan American Federal Savings Bank. The Company has used the Bank as a base for expansion into its current specialty finance businesses. In 1995, the Company commenced its insurance premium finance business through an agreement with BPN Corporation (BPN) and in 1996, the Company commenced its automobile finance business.
Automobile Finance
The Company entered the nonprime automobile finance business in February 1996 by establishing UACC as a subsidiary of the Bank. UACC purchases auto contracts primarily from dealers in used automobiles, approximately 75% from independent dealers and 25% from franchisees of automobile manufacturers. UACCs borrowers are classified as nonprime because they typically have limited credit histories or credit histories that preclude them from obtaining loans through traditional sources. UACCs business strategy includes controlled growth through a national retail branch network. As UACC provides all marketing, origination, underwriting and servicing activities for its loans, income is generated from a combination of spread and non-interest income and is used to cover all operating costs, including compensation, occupancy and systems expense.
Insurance Premium Finance
In May 1995, the Bank entered into an agreement with BPN under the name ClassicPlan (such business, IPF). Under this agreement, which commenced operations in September 1995, the Bank underwrites and finances private passenger automobile and small business insurance premiums in California and BPN markets the financing program and services the loans for the Bank. The Bank lends to individuals or small businesses for the purchase of single premium insurance policies and the Banks collateral is the unearned insurance premium held by the insurance company. The unearned portion of the insurance premium is refundable to IPF in the event the underlying insurance policy is canceled. The Company does not sell or have the risk of underwriting the underlying insurance policy.
As a result of BPN performing substantially all marketing and servicing activities, the Companys role is primarily that of an underwriter and funder of loans. Therefore, IPFs income is generated primarily on a spread basis, supplemented by non-interest income generated from late payment and returned check fees. The Bank uses this income to cover the costs of underwriting and loan administration, including compensation, occupancy and data processing expenses.
11
The Bank
The Bank is a federally chartered stock savings bank, which was formed in 1994. It is the largest Hispanic-controlled savings association in California with four retail branch offices in the state and $471.0 million in deposits at March 31, 2003. The Bank has been the principal funding source to date for our insurance premium and automobile finance businesses primarily through its retail and wholesale deposits and FHLB advances. The Bank has focused its branch marketing efforts on building a middle-income customer base, including some efforts targeted at local Hispanic communities. In addition to operating its retail banking business through its branches, the Bank provides, subject to appropriate cost sharing arrangements, compliance, risk management, executive, financial, facilities and human resources management to other business units of UPFC.
12
Average Balance Sheets
The following table sets forth information relating to the Company for the three and six-month periods ended June 30, 2003 and 2002. The yields and costs are derived by dividing income or expense by the average balance of assets or liabilities allocated to continuing operations, respectively, for the periods shown. The yields and costs include fees, which are considered adjustments to yields.
Three Months Ended June 30, |
||||||||||||||||||
2003 |
2002 |
|||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | Average Balance(1) |
Interest |
Average Yield/ Cost |
Average Balance(1) |
Interest |
Average Yield/ Cost |
||||||||||||
Assets |
||||||||||||||||||
Interest earning assets |
||||||||||||||||||
Securities |
$ | 876,248 | $ | 4,116 | 1.88 | % | $ | 427,289 | $ | 3,123 | 2.93 | % | ||||||
Mortgage loans, net(2) |
| | | 132 | | | ||||||||||||
IPF loans, net(3) |
37,027 | 1,050 | 11.37 | % | 41,170 | 1,433 | 13.97 | % | ||||||||||
Automobile installment contracts, net(4) |
314,933 | 18,923 | 24.10 | % | 224,656 | 12,649 | 22.58 | % | ||||||||||
Total interest earning assets |
1,228,208 | 24,089 | 7.87 | % | 693,247 | 17,205 | 9.96 | % | ||||||||||
Non-interest earning assets |
40,730 | 37,168 | ||||||||||||||||
Total assets |
$ | 1,268,938 | $ | 730,415 | ||||||||||||||
Liabilities and Equity |
||||||||||||||||||
Interest bearing liabilities |
||||||||||||||||||
Deposits |
$ | 469,659 | $ | 3,544 | 3.03 | % | $ | 363,164 | $ | 3,114 | 3.44 | % | ||||||
FHLB advances |
| | | % | 40,198 | 215 | 2.14 | % | ||||||||||
Repurchase Agreements |
698,170 | 2,261 | 1.30 | % | 235,279 | 1,108 | 1.89 | % | ||||||||||
Total interest bearing liabilities |
1,167,829 | 5,805 | 1.99 | % | 638,641 | 4,437 | 2.79 | % | ||||||||||
Non-interest bearing liabilities |
5,890 | 12,488 | ||||||||||||||||
Total liabilities |
1,173,719 | 651,129 | ||||||||||||||||
Equity |
95,219 | 79,286 | ||||||||||||||||
Total liabilities and equity |
$ | 1,268,938 | $ | 730,415 | ||||||||||||||
Net interest income before provision for loan losses |
$ | 18,284 | $ | 12,768 | ||||||||||||||
Net interest rate spread(5) |
5.88 | % | 7.17 | % | ||||||||||||||
Net interest margin(6) |
5.97 | % | 7.39 | % | ||||||||||||||
Ratio of interest earning assets to interest bearing liabilities |
105 | % | 109 | % |
(1) | Average balances are computed on a monthly basis. |
(2) | Net of allowance for loan losses; includes non-performing loans. |
(3) | Net of allowance for loan losses; includes non-performing loans. |
(4) | Net of unearned finance charges, unearned discounts and allowance for loan losses; includes non-performing loans. Yield includes accrued discount. |
(5) | Net interest rate spread represents the difference between the yield on interest earning assets and the cost of interest bearing liabilities. |
(6) | Net interest margin represents net interest income divided by average interest earning assets. |
13
Six Months Ended June 30, |
||||||||||||||||||
2003 |
2002 |
|||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | Average Balance(1) |
Interest |
Average Yield/ Cost |
Average Balance(1) |
Interest |
Average Yield/ Cost |
||||||||||||
Assets |
||||||||||||||||||
Interest earning assets |
||||||||||||||||||
Securities |
$ | 784,560 | $ | 7,830 | 2.01 | % | $ | 375,636 | $ | 5,782 | 3.10 | % | ||||||
Mortgage loans, net(2) |
| | | % | 147 | 3 | 3.55 | % | ||||||||||
IPF loans, net(3) |
35,738 | 2,091 | 11.80 | % | 40,243 | 2,762 | 13.86 | % | ||||||||||
Automobile installment contracts, net(4) |
299,980 | 34,685 | 23.32 | % | 215,051 | 24,350 | 22.83 | % | ||||||||||
Total interest earning assets |
1,120,278 | 44,606 | 8.03 | % | 631,077 | 32,897 | 10.51 | % | ||||||||||
Non-interest earning assets |
39,540 | 35,923 | ||||||||||||||||
Total assets |
$ | 1,159,818 | $ | 667,000 | ||||||||||||||
Liabilities and Equity |
||||||||||||||||||
Interest bearing liabilities |
||||||||||||||||||
Deposits |
$ | 470,277 | $ | 7,236 | 3.10 | % | $ | 364,445 | $ | 6,348 | 3.51 | % | ||||||
FHLB advances |
| | | % | 74,450 | 784 | 2.13 | % | ||||||||||
Repurchase agreements |
588,798 | 3,857 | 1.32 | % | 137,465 | 1,300 | 1.91 | % | ||||||||||
Total interest bearing liabilities |
1,059,075 | 11,093 | 2.11 | % | 576,360 | 8,432 | 2.95 | % | ||||||||||
Non-interest bearing liabilities |
7,348 | 12,568 | ||||||||||||||||
Total liabilities |
1,066,423 | 588,928 | ||||||||||||||||
Equity |
93,395 | 78,072 | ||||||||||||||||
Total liabilities and equity |
$ | 1,159,818 | $ | 667,000 | ||||||||||||||
Net interest income before provision for loan losses |
$ | 33,513 | $ | 24,465 | ||||||||||||||
Net interest rate spread(5) |
5.92 | % | 7.56 | % | ||||||||||||||
Net interest margin(6) |
6.03 | % | 7.82 | % | ||||||||||||||
Ratio of interest earning assets to interest bearing liabilities |
106 | % | 109 | % |
(1) | Average balances are computed on a monthly basis. |
(2) | Net of allowance for loan losses; includes non-performing loans. |
(3) | Net of allowance for loan losses; includes non-performing loans. |
(4) | Net of unearned finance charges unearned discounts and allowance for loan losses; includes non-performing loans. |
(5) | Net interest rate spread represents the difference between the yield on interest earning assets and the cost of interest bearing liabilities. |
(6) | Net interest margin represents net interest income divided by average interest earning assets. |
Comparison of Operating Results for the Three Months Ended June 30, 2003 and June 30, 2002
General
For the three months ended June 30, 2003, the Company reported income of $4.1 million or $0.23 per diluted share; an increase of $1.1 million from $3.0 million or $.17 per diluted share for the three months ended June 30, 2002.
The increase in net income was due primarily to a $5.5 million increase in net interest income to $18.3 million from $12.8 million in the second quarter of 2002, partially offset by a $2.0 million increase in the provision for loan losses and a $1.4 million increase in interest expense. Net interest income was favorably impacted by the continued expansion and growth of the Companys automobile finance business.
Auto contracts purchased, including unearned finance charges, increased $39.5 million to $116.7 million from $77.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2002, as a result of our planned growth in the auto finance business. Insurance premium finance originations increased $200,000 to $30.3 million from $30.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2002.
Interest Income
Interest income increased to $24.1 million from $17.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2002, due primarily to a $535 million increase in average interest earning assets, partially offset by a 2.09% decrease in yield on earning assets. The largest growth components in average interest earning assets were in
14
investment securities, which increased by $449 million and automobile installment contracts, which increased by $90 million. The increase in investment securities reflects the need to increase assets to meet the 30% qualified thrift lender requirement of the Office of Thrift Supervision (OTS) while the increase in auto contracts resulted from the purchase of additional dealer contracts in existing and new markets consistent with planned growth.
The decline in net interest margin was due primarily to an increased concentration of lower yielding securities in the three months ended June 30, 2003 compared to the three months ended June 30, 2002. The yield on the average balance of short-term investments and investment securities decreased to 1.88% from 2.93% for the 3-month periods ending June 30, 2003 and 2002, respectively.
Interest Expense
Interest expense increased to $5.8 million for the three months ended June 30, 2003 from $4.4 million for the three months ended June 30, 2002, due to a $529 million increase in average interest bearing liabilities partially offset by a general decline in market interest rates. The largest components of average interest bearing liabilities were deposits of $470 million and repurchase agreements of $698 million. Average repurchase agreements increased to $698 million from $235 million for the three months ended of June 30, 2002 as a result of a corresponding increase in investment securities. The average cost of liabilities decreased to 1.99% for the three months ended June 30, 2002 from 2.79% for the comparable period in 2002, generally as a result of a decrease in market interest rates.
Provision for Loan Losses
Provision for loan losses was $2.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2003 compared to $99,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2002. The provision for loan losses in 2002 reflects only estimated losses associated with the Companys insurance premium finance business. The provision for 2003 reflects a provision expense of $2.0 million in UACC and a provision expense of $63,000 in IPF.
In addition to its provision for losses in 2002, the Companys allowance for loan losses was increased by its allocation of acquisition discounts related to the purchase of automobile installment contracts. At December 31, 2002, the Company was allocating 11.5% of acquisition discounts to allowance for loan losses.
Effective January 1, 2003, after consultation with the OTS, the Bank has elected to allocate the purchase price entirely to auto contracts and unearned discount at the date of purchase. The unearned discount will be accreted as an adjustment to yield over the life of the contract. An allowance for loan losses will be established through provision for losses recorded in income as necessary to provide for estimated contract losses (net of remaining unearned income) at each reporting date. Management expects that current and future results will reflect higher yields and provisions for loan losses being recorded from purchased auto contracts.
The total allowance for loan losses was $16.9 million at June 30, 2003 compared with $20.5 million at June 30, 2002, representing 4.26% of loans at June 30, 2003 and 6.91% at June 30, 2002. Additionally, unearned discounts on loans totaled $8.5 million at June 30, 2003 compared with zero at June 30, 2002 representing 2.14% of loans at June 30, 2003.
Effective January 1, 2003, an allowance for loan losses is established for all new loans based on losses incurred in the portfolio as of the statement date as opposed to estimated losses over the remaining life of the loan.
Annualized net charge-offs to average loans were 5.0% for the three months ended June 30, 2003 compared with 5.5% for the three months ended June 30, 2002 and 5.8% for the three months ended March 31, 2003.
15
Non-interest Income
Non-interest income increased to $771,000 from $300,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2003 primarily as a result of a $315,000 gain on the sale of investment securities.
Non-interest Expense
Non-interest expense increased $2.1 to $10.1million from $8.0 million for the three months ended June 30, 2002. The increase in non-interest expense was driven primarily by an increase in salaries, employee benefit costs and occupancy expenses associated with the planned growth of the auto finance business segment. During the last year, the Company expanded its automobile finance operations, resulting in an increase to 417 employees in 62 offices, as of June 30, 2003 from 310 employees in 46 offices, as of June 30, 2002.
Income Taxes
Income taxes increased $805,000 to $2.8 million for the three months ended June 30, 2003 from $2.0 million for the three months ended June 30, 2002. This increase occurred as a result of a $1.9 million increase in income before income taxes between the two periods. The effective tax rate did not change appreciably.
Comparison of Operating Results for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2003 and June 30, 2002
General
For the six months ended June 30, 2003, the Company reported income of $8.0 million or $0.45 per diluted share. This compares with income of $5.7 million or $0.33 per diluted share, for the comparable period a year ago.
The increase in net income was due primarily to a $9.0 million increase in net interest income, which increased to $33.5 million in the first six months of 2003 from $24.5 million during the same period of 2002. Net interest income was favorably impacted by the continued expansion and growth of the Companys automobile finance business.
Auto contracts purchased, including unearned finance charges, increased $73.8 million to $222.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2003 from $149.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2002, as a result of our planned growth in the auto finance business, while insurance premium finance originations decreased $3.6 million to $54.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2003 from $58.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2003
Interest Income
Interest income increased to $44.6 million from $32.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2002, due primarily to a $489 million increase in average interest earning assets, partially offset by a 2.48% decrease in net interest margin. The largest growth components in average interest earning assets were in investment securities, which increased by $409 million and automobile installment contracts, which increased by $85 million. The increase in investment securities reflects the need to increase assets to meet the 30% qualified thrift lender requirement of the OTS, while the increase in auto contracts resulted from the purchase of additional dealer contracts in existing and new markets consistent with planned growth.
The decline in net interest margin was due primarily to an increased concentration of lower yielding securities in the six months ended June 30, 2003 compared to the six months end June 30, 2002. The yield on the average balance of short-term investments and investment securities decreased to 2.01% from 3.10% for the six-month periods ending June 30, 2003 and 2002, respectively.
16
Interest Expense
Interest expense increased to $11.1 million from $8.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2002 due to a $483 million increase in average interest bearing liabilities, partially offset by a 0.84% decline in average cost of liabilities. The largest components of average interest bearing liabilities are Bank deposits, which increased to $470.3 million from an average balance of $364.4 million during the six months ended June 30, 2002, and repurchase agreements, which increased to $588.8 million from $137.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2002 The average cost of liabilities decreased to 2.11% for the six months ended June 30, 2003 from 2.95% for the comparable period in 2003 generally as a result of a decrease in market interest rates.
Provision and Allowance for Loan Losses
Provision for loan losses was $2.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2003 compared to $183,000 for the six months ending June 30, 2002. The provision for loan losses in 2002 reflects only estimated losses associated with the Companys insurance premium finance business. The provision for 2003 reflects a provision expense of $2.7 million in UACC, partially offset by a $139,000 recovery of expense in IPF. The recovery of expense in IPF reflects a substantial reduction in loan losses in the first half of 2003 and in expected losses. This change in losses resulted from a change in loan mix in IPF from auto insurance premium loans to commercial insurance premium loans, which have lower expected losses.
In addition to its provision for loan losses in 2002, the Companys allowance for loan losses was increased by its allocation of acquisition discounts and a purchase accounting adjustment to allowance for loan losses. At December 31, 2002, the Company was allocating 11.5% of the net loan amount of all new auto loans to allowance for loan losses.
Effective January 1, 2003, after consultation with the OTS, the Bank has elected to allocate the purchase price entirely to auto contracts and unearned discount at the date of purchase. The unearned discount will be accreted as an adjustment to yield over the life of the contract. An allowance for loan losses will be established through provision for losses recorded in income as necessary to provide for estimated contract losses (net of remaining unearned income) at each reporting date. Management expects that current and future results will reflect higher yields and provisions for loan losses being recorded from purchased auto contracts.
The total allowance for loan losses was $16.9 million at June 30, 2003 compared with $20.5 million at June 30, 2002, representing 4.26% of loans at June 30, 2003 and 6.91% at June 30, 2002. Additionally, unearned discounts on loans totaled $8.5 million at June 30, 2003 compared with zero at June 30, 2002, representing 2.14% of loans at June 30, 2003.
Effective January 1, 2003, an allowance for loan losses is established for all new loans based on losses incurred in the portfolio as of the statement date as opposed to estimated losses over the remaining life of the loan.
Annualized net charge-offs to average loans were 5.38% for the six months ended June 30, 2003 compared with 6.15% for the six months ended June 30, 2002. The allowance for loan losses for 2003 was favorably impacted by the recovery of $520,000 from the State of California for refund of sales taxes on repossessed autos.
Non-interest Income
Non-interest income increased to $2.0 million from $666,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2002 as a result of a $716,000 gain on the sale of all remaining mortgage related assets and a $315,000 gain on the sale of investment securities.
17
Non-interest Expense
Non-interest expense increased $3.5 million to $19.4 million from $15.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2002. The increase in non-interest expense was driven primarily by an increase in salaries, employee benefit costs and occupancy expenses associated with the planned growth of the auto finance business. During the last year, the Company expanded its automobile finance operations, resulting in an increase to 417 employees in 62 offices, as of June 30, 2003, from 310 employees in 46 offices, as of June 30, 2002.
Income Taxes
Income taxes increased $1.9 million; to $5.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2003 from $3.5 million for the six-month period ended June 30, 2002. This increase occurred as a result of a $4.4 million increase in income before income taxes between the two periods. The effective tax rate did not change appreciably.
Comparison of Financial Condition at June 30, 2003 and December 31, 2002
Total assets increased $398.1 million to $1,349.4 million, from $951.3 million at December 31, 2002. This increase occurred primarily as a result of a $64.5 million increase in loans to $395.8 million from $331.3 million at December 31, 2002 and a $312.8 million increase in the securities to $916.1 million, from $603.3 million at December 31, 2002.
Deposits increased $300,000 to $468.8 million from $468.5 million at December 31, 2002. Retail deposits increased $19.7 million to $332.5 million from $312.8 million at December 31, 2002. Brokered deposits decreased $19.4 million to $136.3 million from $155.7 million at December 31, 2002.
Repurchase agreements increased $394.2 million to $778.8 million at June 30, 2003 from $384.6 million at December 31, 2002. The increase was in LIBOR based floating rate borrowings used to fund LIBOR based floating rate securities.
Shareholders equity increased to $97.4 million at June 30, 2003 from $89.7 million at December 31, 2002, primarily as a result of net income of $8.0 million during the six months ended June 30, 2002.
Management of Interest Rate Risk
The principal objective of the Companys interest rate risk management program is to evaluate the interest rate risk inherent in the Companys business activities, determine the level of appropriate risk given the Companys operating environment, capital and liquidity requirements and performance objectives and manage the risk consistent with guidelines approved by the Board of Directors. Through such management, the Company seeks to reduce the exposure of its operations to changes in interest rates. The Board of Directors reviews on a quarterly basis the asset/liability position of the Company, including simulation of the effect on capital of various interest rate scenarios.
The Companys profits depend, in part, on the difference, or spread, between the effective rate of interest received on the loans it originates and the interest rates paid on deposits and other financing facilities, which can be adversely affected by movements in interest rates.
The Banks interest rate sensitivity is monitored by the Board of Directors and management through the use of a model, which estimates the change in the Banks net portfolio value (NPV) over a range of interest rate scenarios. NPV is the present value of expected cash flows from assets and liabilities, and NPV Ratio is defined as the NPV in that scenario divided by the market value of assets in the same scenario. The Company utilizes a market value model based on the Banks quarterly financial information
At March 31, 2003, the most recent date for which the relevant NPV model is available, the Banks sensitivity measure resulting from a 200 basis point decrease in interest rates was 90 basis points and would
18
result in a $13.5 million increase in the NPV of the Bank, and from a 200 basis point increase in interest rates was -98 basis points and would result in a $14.0 million decrease in the NPV of the Bank.
Although the NPV measurement provides an indication of the Banks interest rate risk exposure at a particular point in time, such measurement is not intended to and does not provide a precise forecast of the effect of changes in market interest rates on the Banks net interest income and will differ from actual results. Management monitors the results of this modeling, which are presented to the Board of Directors on a quarterly basis.
The following table shows the NPV and projected change in the NPV of the Bank at March 31, 2003 assuming an instantaneous and sustained change in market interest rates of 100, 200 and 300 basis points (bp).
Interest Rate Sensitivity of Net Portfolio Value
Net Portfolio Value |
NPV as % of Portfolio Value of Assets | ||||||||||||||
Change in Rates |
$ Amount |
$ Change |
% Change |
NPV Ratio |
% Change | ||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | |||||||||||||||
+300 bp |
$ | 87,696 | $ | (21,246 | ) | -19.5 | % | 7.44 | % | -151 bp | |||||
+200 bp |
94,938 | (14,005 | ) | -12.9 | % | 7.97 | % | -98 bp | |||||||
+100 bp |
102,021 | (6,921 | ) | -6.4 | % | 8.47 | % | -48 bp | |||||||
0 bp |
108,942 | | | 8.95 | % | | |||||||||
-100 bp |
115,697 | 6,755 | 6.2 | % | 9.40 | % | 46 bp | ||||||||
-200 bp |
122,487 | 13,544 | 12.4 | % | 9.85 | % | 90bp | ||||||||
-300 bp |
130,660 | 21,718 | 19.9 | % | 10.40 | % | 145bp |
19
Liquidity and Capital Resources
General
The Companys primary sources of funds are deposits at the Bank, FHLB advances, commercial repurchase agreements, and, to a lesser extent, interest payments on short-term investments and proceeds from the maturation of securities. While maturities and scheduled amortization of loans are a predictable source of funds, deposit flows and loan prepayments are greatly influenced by general interest rates, economic conditions and competition. However, the Company has continued to maintain adequate levels of liquid assets to fund its operations. Management, through its Asset and Liability Committee, monitors rates and terms of competing sources of funds to use the most cost-effective source of funds wherever possible.
The major source of funds consists of deposits obtained through the Banks four retail branches in California. The Bank offers checking accounts, various money market accounts, regular passbook accounts, fixed interest rate certificates with varying maturities and retirement accounts. Deposit account terms vary by interest rate, minimum balance requirements and the duration of the account. Interest rates paid, maturity terms, service fees and withdrawal penalties are established by the Bank periodically based on liquidity and financing requirements, rates paid by competitors, growth goals and federal regulations. At June 30, 2003, retail deposits were $332.5 million or 71% of total deposits.
The Bank also uses broker-originated deposits to supplement its retail deposits and, at June 30, 2003, brokered deposits totaled $136.3 million or 29% of total deposits. Brokered deposits are originated through major dealers specializing in such products.
The following table sets forth the balances and rates paid on each category of deposits for the dates indicated.
June 30, 2003 |
December 31, |
|||||||||||||||||
2002 |
2001 |
|||||||||||||||||
Balance |
Weighted Average Rate |
Balance |
Weighted Average Rate |
Balance |
Weighted Rate |
|||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||
Passbook accounts |
$ | 62,557 | 1.56 | % | $ | 52,911 | 1.72 | % | $ | 47,931 | 2.31 | % | ||||||
Checking accounts |
17,403 | 0.77 | % | 16,854 | 1.00 | % | 13,795 | 1.06 | % | |||||||||
Certificates of deposit |
||||||||||||||||||
Under $100,000 |
294,006 | 3.30 | % | 314,130 | 3.63 | % | 212,981 | 4.43 | % | |||||||||
$100,000 and over |
94,841 | 2.65 | % | 84,563 | 3.13 | % | 82,643 | 4.33 | % | |||||||||
Total |
$ | 468,807 | 2.84 | % | $ | 468,458 | 3.23 | % | $ | 357,350 | 3.99 | % | ||||||
The following table sets forth the time remaining until maturity for all CDs at June 30, 2003, December 31, 2002 and 2001.
June 30, 2003 |
December 31, 2002 |
December 31, 2001 | |||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | |||||||||
Maturity within one year |
$ | 153,570 | $ | 185,295 | $ | 237,683 | |||
Maturity within two years |
74,623 | 58,852 | 46,170 | ||||||
Maturity within three years |
42,687 | 41,628 | 7,657 | ||||||
Maturity over three years |
117,967 | 112,918 | 4,114 | ||||||
Total certificates of deposit |
$ | 388,847 | $ | 398,693 | $ | 295,624 | |||
The Bank has made significant progress in extending maturities of its deposits. However, the Bank has a significant amount of deposits maturing in less than one year. The Company believes the Banks current pricing strategy will enable it to retain a significant portion of these accounts at maturity and that it will continue to have access to sufficient amounts of CDs which, together with other funding sources, will provide the necessary level of liquidity to finance its lending businesses. However, as a result of these shorter-term
20
deposits, the rates on these accounts may be more sensitive to movements in market interest rates, which may result in a higher cost of funds.
At June 30, 2003, the Bank exceeded all of its regulatory capital requirements with tangible capital of $86.7 million, or 6.43% of total adjusted assets, which is above the required level of $20.2 million, or 1.5%; core capital of $86.7 million, or 6.43% of total adjusted assets, which is above the required level of $40.5 million, or 3.0%; and risk-based capital of $94.2 million, or 16.48% of risk-weighted assets, which is above the required level of $48.2 million, or 8.0%.
As used herein, leverage ratio means the ratio of core capital to adjusted total assets, Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio means the ratio of core capital to risk-weighted assets, and total risk-based capital ratio means the ratio of total capital to risk-weighted assets, in each case as calculated in accordance with current OTS capital regulations. Under the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Act of 1991 (FDICIA), the Bank is deemed to be well capitalized as of June 30, 2003.
The Company has other sources of liquidity, including FHLB advances, repurchase agreements and its liquidity and securities portfolio. Through the Bank, the Company can obtain advances from the FHLB, collateralized by its securities and enter into repurchase agreements utilizing its securities. The FHLB functions as a central reserve bank providing credit for thrifts and certain other member financial institutions. Advances are made pursuant to several programs, each of which has its own interest rate and range of maturities. Limitations on the amount of advances are based generally on a fixed percentage of total assets or on the FHLBs assessment of an institutions credit-worthiness. As of June 30, 2003, the Banks total borrowing capacity under this credit facility was $404.0 million of which $191.5 million was utilized to fund repurchase agreements and $212.5 million was available.
The following table sets forth certain information regarding the Companys short-term borrowed funds (consisting of FHLB advances and reverse repurchase agreements) at or for the periods ended on the dates indicated.
Six Months ended June 30, 2003 |
December 31, |
|||||||||||
2002 |
2001 |
|||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||
FHLB advances |
||||||||||||
Maximum month-end balance |
$ | | $ | 130,000 | $ | 130,000 | ||||||
Balance at end of period |
| | 130,000 | |||||||||
Average balance for period |
| 38,974 | 38,830 | |||||||||
Weighted average interest rate on balance at end of period |
| % | | % | 1.97 | % | ||||||
Weighted average interest rate on average balance for period |
| % | 2.11 | % | 4.04 | % | ||||||
Repurchase agreements |
||||||||||||
Maximum month end balance |
$ | 778,834 | 410,234 | $ | 114,776 | |||||||
Balance at end of period |
778,834 | 388,624 | 114,776 | |||||||||
Average balance for period |
588,798 | 260,139 | 4,503 | |||||||||
Weighted average interest rate on balance at end of period |
1.11 | % | 1.40 | % | 2.37 | % | ||||||
Weighted average interest rate on average balance for period |
1.32 | % | 1.79 | % | 3.46 | % |
The Company had no material contractual obligations or commitments for capital expenditures at June 30, 2003.
Lending Activities
Summary of Loan Portfolio. At June 30, 2003, the Companys net loan portfolio constituted of $370.5 million, or 27.5% of the Companys total assets.
21
The following table sets forth the composition of the Companys loan portfolio at the dates indicated.
(Dollars in thousands) | June 31, 2003 |
December 31, 2002 |
December 31, 2001 |
|||||||||
Consumer Loans |
||||||||||||
Automobile installment contracts |
$ | 356,655 | $ | 298,345 | $ | 232,902 | ||||||
Insurance premium finance |
14,483 | 17,922 | 28,710 | |||||||||
Other consumer loans |
102 | 80 | 98 | |||||||||
Total consumer loans |
371,240 | 316,347 | 261,710 | |||||||||
Mortgage Loans |
||||||||||||
Subprime mortgage loans |
| | 352 | |||||||||
Total mortgage loans |
| 352 | ||||||||||
Commercial Loans |
||||||||||||
Insurance premium finance |
25,233 | 18,400 | 10,921 | |||||||||
Total commercial loans |
25,233 | 18,400 | 10,921 | |||||||||
Total loans |
396,473 | 334,747 | 272,983 | |||||||||
Unearned discounts |
(8,462 | ) | | | ||||||||
Unearned finance charges |
(663 | ) | (3.490 | ) | (18,881 | ) | ||||||
Allowance for loan losses |
(16,854 | ) | (23,179 | ) | (17,460 | ) | ||||||
Total loans, net |
$ | 370,494 | 308,078 | $ | 236,642 | |||||||
Loan Maturities. The following table sets forth the dollar amount of loans maturing in the Companys loan portfolio at June 30, 2003 based on final maturity. Loan balances are reflected before unearned discounts and premiums, unearned finance charges and allowance for loan losses.
One Year or Less |
More Than 1 Year to 3 Years |
More Than 3 Years to 5 Years |
More Than 5 Years to 10 Years |
Total Loans | |||||||||||
Commercial loans |
25,233 | | | | 25,233 | ||||||||||
Consumer loans |
23,338 | 123,939 | 222,896 | 1,067 | 371,240 | ||||||||||
Total |
$ | 48,571 | $ | 123,939 | $ | 222,896 | $ | 1,067 | $ | 396,473 | |||||
Classified Assets and Allowance for Loan Losses
The Companys policy is to maintain an allowance for loan losses to absorb inherent losses, which may be realized on its loan portfolio. These allowances are general valuation allowances for estimates for probable losses not specifically identified. In 2002, the Companys allowance for loan losses was increased by a percentage of each new auto loan, 11.5% of the net contract amount at December 31, 2002 through the allocation of purchase discount to allowance for loan losses. Effective January 1, 2003, after consultation with the OTS, the Bank has elected to allocate the purchase price entirely to auto contracts and unearned discount at the date of purchase. The unearned income will be accreted as an adjustment to yield over the life of the contract. An allowance for loan losses will be established through provision for losses recorded in the statement of operations as necessary to provide for estimated contract losses (net of remaining unearned discount) at each reporting date.
For IPF loans, management established a level of allowance for loan losses based on recent trends in delinquencies and historical charge offs, currently 0.65% of loans, that it feels adequate for the risk in the portfolio. Each month an amount necessary to reach that level is charged against current earnings and added to allowance for loan losses. The level of allowance for loan losses was reduced from 1.25% of loans at December 31, 2002 to the current 0.65% of loans at March 31, 2003 because of a substantial reduction in loan losses in the first quarter of 2003. This reduction in losses resulted primarily from a change in the loan mix
22
from automobile insurance premium loans to commercial insurance premium loans, which have lower expected losses.
Periodically, management reviews the level of allowance for loan losses to determine adequacy. The determination of the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses is based on a variety of factors including an assessment of the credit risk inherent in the portfolio, prior loss experience, the levels and trends of non-performing loans, current and prospective economic conditions and other factors.
The Companys management uses its best judgment in providing for possible loan losses and establishing allowances for loan losses. However, the allowance is an estimate, which is inherently uncertain and depends on the outcome of future events. In addition, regulatory agencies, as an integral part of their examination process, periodically review the Banks allowance for loan losses. Such agencies may require the Bank to increase the allowance based upon their judgment of the information available to them at the time of their examination. The Banks most recent examination by its regulatory agencies was completed in May 2002 and no adjustment to the Banks allowance for loan losses was required.
The following table sets forth the remaining balances of all loans that were more than 30 days delinquent at June 30, 2003, December 31, 2002 and 2001.
Loan |
June 30, 2003 |
% of Total Loans |
December 31, 2002 |
% of Total Loans |
December 31, 2001 |
% of Total Loans |
||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||
30 to 59 days |
$ | 1,780 | .4 | % | $ | 1,778 | 0.5 | % | $ | 1,368 | 0.6 | % | ||||||
60 to 89 days |
717 | .2 | % | 808 | 0.3 | % | 776 | 0.3 | % | |||||||||
90+ days |
451 | .1 | % | 480 | 0.1 | % | 942 | 0.4 | % | |||||||||
Total |
$ | 2,949 | .7 | % | $ | 3,066 | 0.9 | % | $ | 3,086 | 1.3 | % | ||||||
Nonaccrual and Past Due Loans. A non-mortgage loan is placed on nonaccrual status when it is delinquent for 120 days or more. When a loan is reclassified from accrual to nonaccrual status, all previously accrued interest is reversed. Interest income on nonaccrual loans is subsequently recognized only to the extent that cash payments are received or the borrowers ability to make periodic interest and principal payments is in accordance with the loan terms, at which time the loan is returned to accrual status. Accounts, which are deemed fully or partially uncollectible by management, are generally fully reserved or charged off for the amount that exceeds the estimated fair value (net of selling costs) of the underlying collateral.
The following table sets forth the aggregate amount of nonaccrual loans (net of unearned discounts, premiums and unearned finance charges) at June 30, 2003, December 31, 2002 and 2000.
June 30, 2003 |
December 31, |
|||||||||||
2002 |
2001 |
|||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||
Nonaccrual loans |
||||||||||||
Single-family residential |
$ | | $ | | $ | 352 | ||||||
Multi-family residential and commercial |
| | | |||||||||
Consumer and other loans |
113 | $ | 172 | 688 | ||||||||
Total |
$ | 113 | $ | 172 | $ | 1,040 | ||||||
Nonaccrual loans as a percentage of total loans |
0.05 | % | 0.05 | % | 0.44 | % | ||||||
Allowance for loan losses as a percentage of total loans |
4.26 | % | 7.00 | % | 7.38 | % |
23
Allowance for Loan Losses. The following is a summary of the changes in the consolidated allowance for loan losses of the Company for the period indicated. See page 15 for description of changes in allowance for loan losses.
At or For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2003 |
At or For the Year Ended December 31, |
|||||||||||
2002 |
2001 |
|||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||
Allowance for Loan Losses |
||||||||||||
Balance at beginning of period |
$ | 23,179 | $ | 17,460 | $ | 15,156 | ||||||
Provision for loan losses |
2,630 | 638 | 615 | |||||||||
Provision for loan lossesdiscontinued operations |
| | ||||||||||
Charge-offs |
| |||||||||||
Mortgage loans |
| | (1,713 | ) | ||||||||
Consumer loans |
(10,033 | ) | (18,411 | ) | (9,173 | ) | ||||||
(10,033 | ) | (18,411 | ) | (10,886 | ) | |||||||
Recoveries |
| |||||||||||
Mortgage loans |
| 140 | ||||||||||
Consumer loans |
1,078 | 1,079 | 266 | |||||||||
1,078 | (1,079 | ) | 406 | |||||||||
Net charge-offs |
(8,955 | ) | 17,332 | (10,480 | ) | |||||||
Acquisition discounts allocated to loss allowance |
| $ | 22,413 | 12,169 | ||||||||
Balance at end of period |
$ | 16,854 | $ | 23,179 | $ | 17,460 | ||||||
Annualized net charge-offs to average loans |
5.38 | % | 5.88 | % | 4.94 | % | ||||||
Ending allowance to period end loans |
4.26 | % | 7.00 | % | 7.38 | % |
Cash Equivalents and Securities Portfolio
The Companys cash equivalents and securities portfolios are used primarily for liquidity and investment income purposes. Cash equivalents and securities satisfy regulatory requirements for liquidity.
The following is a summary of the Companys short-term investments and securities portfolios as of the dates indicated.
June 30, 2003 |
December 31, |
|||||||||||
2002 |
2001 |
|||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||
Balance at end of period |
||||||||||||
Overnight deposits |
$ | 24,768 | $ | 3,590 | $ | 135,267 | ||||||
U.S. agency securities |
67,899 | 288,193 | 229,660 | |||||||||
U. S. mortgage backed securities |
848,155 | 315,075 | 35,015 | |||||||||
Mutual funds |
| | 20,162 | |||||||||
Total |
$ | 940,822 | $ | 606,858 | $ | 420,104 | ||||||
Weighted average yield at end of period |
||||||||||||
Overnight deposits |
1.13 | % | 0.69 | % | 1.23 | % | ||||||
U.S. agency securities |
1.89 | % | 2.10 | % | 3.35 | % | ||||||
U.S. mortgage backed securities |
1.61 | % | 2.43 | % | 6.60 | % | ||||||
Mutual funds (mortgage backed securities) |
| % | | % | 3.59 | % | ||||||
Weighted average maturity at end of period |
||||||||||||
Overnight deposits |
1 day | 1 day | 1 day | |||||||||
U.S. agency securities |
35 months | 55 months | 85 months | |||||||||
U.S. mortgage backed securities |
312 months | 286 months | 254 months | |||||||||
Mutual funds (mortgage backed securities) |
| | 1 day |
24
Item 3. | Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk |
See Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations-Management of Interest Rate Risk.
Item 4. | Controls and Procedures |
(a) | Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures |
As of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, the Company evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of its disclosure controls and procedures (Disclosure Controls) and its internal controls and procedures for financial reporting (Internal Controls). This evaluation (the Controls Evaluation) was done under the supervision and with the participation of management, including our Chief Executive Officer (CEO) and Chief Financial Officer (CFO). The effectiveness of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures, as determined by this evaluation, is disclosed in the Chief Executive Officers Certification of Report on Form 10-Q for the Quarter Ending March 31, 2003, filed as Exhibit 31.1 hereto, and the Chief Financial Officers Certification Report on Form 10-Q for the Quarter Ending March 31, 2003, filed as Exhibit 31.2 hereto, (together, Certifications).
Disclosure Controls are procedures that are designed with the objective of ensuring that information required to be disclosed in the Companys reports filed under the Exchange Act, such as this Quarterly Report is recorded, processed summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SECs rules and forms. Disclosure Controls are also designed with the objective of ensuring that such information is accumulated and communicated to management included the CEO and CFO, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Internal Controls are procedures which are designed with the objective of permitting the preparation of our financial statements in conformity with GAAP and of providing reasonable assurance that: (1) transactions are properly authorized; (2) assets are safeguarded against unauthorized or improper use; and (3) transactions are properly recorded and reported.
The Companys management, including the CEO and CFO, does not expect that the Companys Disclosure Controls or Internal Controls will prevent all errors and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the Company have been detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty, and that breakdowns can occur because of simple error or mistake. Additionally, controls can be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people, or by management override of the control. The design of any system of controls also is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions; over time, control may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. Because of the inherent limitations in a cost-effective control system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected.
The Companys Internal Controls are also evaluated on an ongoing basis by its finance and internal audit organization. The overall goals of these various evaluation activities are to monitor the Companys Disclosure Controls and Internal Controls and to make modifications as necessary. The Companys intent in this regard is that the Disclosure Controls and the Internal Controls will be maintained as dynamic systems that change (including with improvements and corrections) as conditions warrant.
Based upon the Controls Evaluation, The Companys CEO and CFO have concluded that, subject to the limitations noted above, The Companys Disclosure Controls are effective to ensure that material information relating to UPFC and its consolidated subsidiaries is made known to management, including the CEO and CFO, particularly during the period when periodic reports are being prepared, and that The
25
Companys Internal Controls are effective to provide reasonable assurance that its financial statements are fairly presented in conformity with GAAP.
(B) | Changes in Internal Controls |
In accord with SEC requirements, and as disclosed in the Certifications, the CEO and CFO note that, since the date of the Controls Evaluation to the date of this Quarterly Report, there have been no significant changes in Internal Controls or in other factors that could significantly affect Internal Controls, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.
PART II. | OTHER INFORMATION |
Item 1. | Legal Proceedings. |
Not applicable
Item 2. | Changes in Securities and Use of Proceeds. |
Not applicable
Item 3. | Defaults Upon Senior Securities. |
Not applicable
Item 4. | Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders. |
At the Annual Meeting of the Companys shareholders held on June 24, 2003 the shareholders considered the following proposals:
Proposal I. The election of three directors to serve terms of two years
Proposal II. The ratification of the selection of KPMG LLP as the Companys independent auditors for 2003
Proposal I Messrs. Guillermo Bron, Luis Maizel and Ray Thousand were elected as directors of the Company with terms expiring in 2005. These directors were elected with the following share voting: Guillermo Bron 16,657,331 authority given; 148,423 authority withheld, Luis Maizel 15,800,204 authority given, 5,530 authority withheld; Ray Thousand 15,657,331 authority given, 148,423 authority withheld. Other directors continuing on the Board with terms expiring in 2004, were Messrs. Ron Duncanson and Mitchell Lynn. There is currently a vacancy on the Board of Directors as Mr. Larry Grill resigned from the Board for personal reasons.
Proposal II Ratification of KPMG LLP as the Companys independent auditors was approved by shareholders with voting at 15,800,854 for, 4,700 against and 200 withheld.
Item 5. | Other Information. |
Not applicable
Item 6. | Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K. |
(a) | List of Exhibits |
Exhibit 31.1 Rule 13a-15(e) / 15d-15(e) Certification
Exhibit 31.2 Rule 13a-15(e) / 15d-15(e) Certification
26
Exhibit 32.1 Section 1350 Certification
Exhibit 32.2 Section 1350 Certification
(b) | Reports on Form 8-K |
Form 8-K filed July 25, 2003
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
United PanAm Financial Corp. | ||||||
Date: August 6, 2003 |
By:/s/Guillermo Bron | |||||
Guillermo Bron | ||||||
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) | ||||||
August 6, 2003 |
By: /s/Garland W. Koch | |||||
Garland W. Koch | ||||||
Sr. Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |
27