BURLINGTON NORTHERN SANTA FE CORP - 10-Q Quarterly Report

June 30,

2003

December 31,

2002

Short-term interest rate hedging asset

Long-term interest rate hedging asset

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes þ No ¨

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.

The Consolidated Financial Statements should be read in conjunction with the Burlington Northern Santa Fe Corporation Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002, including the financial statements and notes thereto. The Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts of Burlington Northern Santa Fe Corporation and its majority-owned subsidiaries, all of which are separate legal entities (collectively, BNSF or Company). The Company’s principal operating subsidiary is The Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Company (BNSF Railway). All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated. BNSF was incorporated in Delaware on December 16, 1994.

The results of operations for any interim period are not necessarily indicative of the results of operations to be expected for the entire year. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of only normal recurring adjustments, except as disclosed) necessary to present fairly BNSF’s consolidated financial position as of June 30, 2003 and the results of operations for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2003 and 2002 have been included.

Certain comparative prior year amounts in the Consolidated Financial Statements have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation.

The Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 143, Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations, on January 1, 2003. This statement requires BNSF to recognize a liability for legally obligated asset retirement costs associated with tangible long-lived assets. SFAS No. 143 also disallows the accrual of retirement costs that are not legal obligations. As a result, BNSF and other railroads were required to change their accounting policies for certain track structure assets to exclude removal costs as a component of depreciation expense where the inclusion of such costs would result in accumulated depreciation balances exceeding the historical basis of the assets. This change will result in lower Depreciation and amortization expense primarily offset by higher Compensation and benefits and Purchased services expenses in the period in which removal costs are incurred.

The net cumulative effect of adopting SFAS No. 143 for years prior to 2003 was an increase to Net income of $39 million, net of tax, or $0.11 per share (basic and diluted), for the six months ended June 30, 2003, which is reflected in the cumulative effect adjustment recorded in the first quarter of 2003. The net effect of adoption of SFAS No. 143 on the six month period ended June 30, 2003 is an increase to Income before cumulative effect of accounting change of $5 million, net of tax, or $0.01 per share (basic and diluted). The Company anticipates that the adoption of SFAS No. 143 will have an insignificant impact on full year 2003 Income before cumulative effect of accounting change. The Company’s liability for legally obligated asset retirement costs is $4 million at June 30, 2003.

The following table presents the pro forma net income and earnings per share if SFAS No. 143 would have been applied retroactively:

The Company applies Accounting Principles Board (APB) Opinion 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, and related interpretations in accounting for its stock based plans. In accordance with APB Opinion 25, the Company records the intrinsic value of stock-based compensation as expense. Accordingly, no compensation expense has been recognized for its fixed stock option plans as the exercise price equals the stock price on the date of grant. The table below illustrates the effect on net income and earnings per share if the Company had applied the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock Based Compensation, to stock-based employee compensation.

The Company currently uses derivatives to hedge against increases in diesel fuel prices and interest rates as well as to convert a portion of its fixed-rate long-term debt to floating-rate debt. The Company formally documents the relationship between the hedging instrument and the hedged item, as well as the risk management objective and strategy for the use of the hedging instrument. This documentation includes linking the derivatives that are designated as fair value or cash flow hedges to specific assets or liabilities on the balance sheets, commitments or forecasted transactions. The Company assesses at the time a derivative contract is entered into, and at least quarterly, whether the derivative item is effective in offsetting the changes in fair value or cash flows. Any change in fair value resulting from ineffectiveness, as defined by SFAS No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, as amended, is recognized in current period earnings. For derivative instruments that are designated and qualify as cash flow hedges, the effective portion of the gain or loss on the derivative instrument is recorded in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (AOCI) as a separate component of stockholders’ equity and reclassified into earnings in the period during which the hedge transaction affects earnings.

BNSF monitors its hedging positions and credit ratings of its counterparties and does not anticipate losses due to counterparty nonperformance.

Fuel costs represented 14 and 11 percent of total operating expenses during the six months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002, respectively. Due to the significance of diesel fuel expenses to the operations of BNSF and the historical volatility of fuel prices, the Company maintains a program to hedge against fluctuations in the price of its diesel fuel purchases. The intent of the program is to protect the Company’s operating margins and overall profitability from adverse fuel price changes by entering into fuel-hedge instruments based on management’s evaluation of current and expected diesel fuel price trends. However, to the extent the Company hedges portions of its fuel purchases, it may not realize the impact of decreases in fuel prices. Conversely, to the extent the Company does not hedge portions of its fuel purchases, it may be adversely affected by increases in fuel prices. Based on fuel consumption during the first six months of 2003 and excluding the impact of the hedging program, each one-cent increase in the price of fuel would result in approximately $12 million of additional fuel expense on an annual basis.

The fuel-hedging program includes the use of derivatives that are accounted for as cash flow hedges. As of June 30, 2003, the Company had entered into fuel swap and costless collar agreements utilizing West Texas Intermediate crude oil (WTI). The hedge prices do not include taxes, transportation costs, certain other fuel handling costs, and any differences which may occur between the prices of WTI and the purchase price of BNSF’s diesel fuel, including refining costs. The sum of all such costs typically ranges between 12 and 30 cents per gallon.

During the second quarter of 2003, the Company entered into fuel swap agreements utilizing WTI to hedge the equivalent of approximately 110 million gallons of fuel at an average price of approximately $23.88 per barrel. Also, during the second quarter of 2003, the Company entered into costless collar agreements utilizing WTI to hedge the equivalent of approximately 139 million gallons of fuel with an average cap price of $26.70 per barrel and an average floor price of $22.19 per barrel. The tables below provide fuel hedge data for all WTI fuel hedges outstanding at June 30, 2003.

In addition, BNSF entered into costless collar agreements utilizing NYMEX #2 heating oil (HO). The hedge prices do not include taxes, transportation costs, certain other fuel handling costs and any differences which may occur between the prices of HO and the purchase price of BNSF’s diesel fuel. The sum of all such costs typically ranges between 7 and 17 cents per gallon.

During the second quarter of 2003, the Company entered into costless collar agreements utilizing HO to hedge the equivalent of approximately 110 million gallons of fuel with an average cap price of $0.78 per gallon and an average floor price of $0.70 per gallon. In addition, the Company converted approximately 44 million gallons of WTI collars into HO collars. These converted HO collars have an average cap price of $0.74 per gallon and an average floor price of $0.67 per gallon. The tables below provide fuel hedge data for all HO fuel hedges outstanding at June 30, 2003.

As of June 30, 2003, BNSF’s total fuel-hedging program covered approximately 54 percent, 43 percent, 31 percent and 3 percent of estimated fuel purchases for the remainder of 2003, 2004, 2005 and 2006, respectively. Hedge positions are closely monitored to ensure that they will not exceed actual fuel requirements in any period.

The amounts recorded in the Consolidated Statements of Income for fuel hedge transactions were as follows (in millions):

During the second quarter of 2003, the Company recognized a gain of $2 million related to the ineffective portion of unexpired hedges. The ineffective portion of unexpired hedges for the same period in 2002 was de minimis. During the first six months of 2003, the ineffective portion of unexpired hedges was de minimus. For the same period in 2002, the Company recognized a gain of $1 million related to the ineffective portion of unexpired hedges.

The amounts recorded in AOCI in the Consolidated Balance Sheets for fuel hedge transactions were as follows (in millions):

Amounts recorded in AOCI represent the fair value less the ineffective portion of unexpired hedges.

BNSF measures the fair value of hedges from data provided by various external counterparties. To value a swap, the Company uses the forward commodity price for the period hedged. The fair values of costless collars are calculated and provided by the corresponding counterparties.

See Other Matters within Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations for information about fuel hedges entered into after June 30, 2003.

From time to time, the Company enters into various interest rate hedging transactions for the purpose of managing exposure to fluctuations in interest rates and establishing rates in anticipation of future debt issuances as well as to convert a portion of its fixed-rate long-term debt to floating-rate debt. The Company uses interest rate swaps and treasury locks as part of its interest rate risk management strategy.

The Company enters into interest rate swaps to convert fixed-rate debt to floating-rate debt. These swaps are accounted for as fair value hedges under SFAS No. 133. These fair value hedges qualify for the short cut method of recognition; therefore, no portion of these swaps is treated as ineffective. As of June 30, 2003, BNSF had entered into nine separate swaps on a notional amount of $900 million ($900 million at December 31, 2002) in which it pays an average floating rate, which fluctuates quarterly, based on LIBOR. The average floating rate to be paid by BNSF

as of June 30, 2003, was 3.13 percent and the average fixed rate BNSF is to receive is 7.07 percent. These swaps will expire between 2004 and 2009.

The amounts recorded in the Consolidated Statements of Income for interest rate fair value hedge transactions were as follows (in millions):

The amounts recorded in other assets with a corresponding increase to debt on the Consolidated Balance Sheets for interest rate fair value hedge transactions, which represent the fair value of unexpired hedges, were as follows (in millions):

The Company uses interest rate swaps to fix the LIBOR component of commercial paper. These swaps are accounted for as cash flow hedges under SFAS No. 133 and qualify for the short-cut method of recognition and, therefore, no portion of these swaps is treated as ineffective. All of these swaps had expired as of June 30, 2003 ($100 million were outstanding at December 31, 2002).

In anticipation of future debt issuances, BNSF entered into three treasury lock transactions in 2002 totaling $150 million to fix the treasury component on a future 10-year debt issuance. The average locked-in rate was 4.38 percent. These treasury locks were closed in May 2003 in connection with the issuance of $250 million of 4.30 percent notes due July 1, 2013. BNSF paid the counterparties $10 million on the closing date and this will be amortized over the life of the related notes.

The amounts recorded in the Consolidated Statements of Income for interest rate cash flow hedge transactions were as follows (in millions):

The amounts recorded in AOCI in the Consolidated Balance Sheets for interest rate cash flow hedge transactions, which represent the fair value of unexpired hedges, were as follows (in millions):

BNSF’s measurement of the fair value of interest rate swaps and treasury locks is based on estimates of the mid-market values for the transactions provided by the counterparties to these agreements.

BNSF’s comprehensive income includes Net income and changes related to derivatives, which qualify for cash flow hedge accounting.

BNSF Railway transfers most of its accounts receivable to Santa Fe Receivables Corporation (SFRC), a special purpose subsidiary. SFRC transfers an undivided interest in such receivables, with limited exceptions, to a master trust, and causes the trust to issue an undivided interest in the receivables to investors (the A/R sales program). The undivided interests in the master trust may be in the form of certificates or purchased interests.

SFRC renewed $350 million of its $700 million accounts receivable facility, effective June 2003, for an additional 364 days. In addition, SFRC entered into a separate $350 million accounts receivable facility with a five year term in June 2003. The Company’s total capacity to sell undivided interests to investors under the A/R sales program was $700 million at June 30, 2003. Outstanding undivided interests held by investors under the A/R sales program were $625 million at June 30, 2003, and $594 million, net of $8 million of excess cash held in the trust, at December 31, 2002. These receivables were derecognized by BNSF Railway in connection with the sale of undivided interests under the A/R sales program. The undivided interests were supported by $820 million and $771 million of receivables transferred by SFRC to the master trust at June 30, 2003 and December 31, 2002, respectively. When SFRC transfers these receivables to the master trust, it retains an undivided interest in the receivables sold. This retained interest is included in accounts receivable in the Company’s financial statements. SFRC’s retained interest in these receivables of $195 million and $177 million at June 30, 2003 and December 31, 2002, respectively, less an allowance for uncollectible accounts, reflected the total accounts receivables transferred by SFRC to the master trust less $625 million and $594 million, at June 30, 2003 and December 31, 2002, respectively, of outstanding undivided interests held by investors. Due to a relatively short collection cycle, the fair value of the undivided interest transferred to investors in the A/R sales program approximated book value and there was no gain or loss from the transaction.

The Company retains the collection responsibility with respect to the accounts receivable. No servicing asset or liability has been recorded since the fees the Company receives for servicing the receivables approximate the related costs. SFRC’s costs of the sale of receivables are included in Other expense, net and were $4 million and $7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002, respectively. These costs fluctuate monthly with changes in prevailing interest rates, and were based on weighted average interest rates of 1.3 percent and 2.0 percent in the six months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002, respectively. These costs include interest, discounts associated with transferring the receivables under the A/R sales program to SFRC, program fees paid to banks, incidental commercial paper issuing costs, and fees for unused commitment availability.

The amount of accounts receivable transferred by BNSF Railway to SFRC fluctuates based upon the availability of receivables and is directly affected by changing business volumes and credit risks, including dilution and delinquencies. BNSF Railway has historically experienced very low levels of default or dilution. If dilution or delinquency percentages were to increase one percentage point, the value of BNSF Railway’s retained interest would increase by approximately $8 million.

Receivables funded under the A/R sales program may not include amounts over 90 days past due or concentrations over certain limits with any one customer. At June 30, 2003 and December 31, 2002, $78 million and $77 million, respectively, of accounts receivable were greater than 90 days old. The Company maintains an allowance for bill adjustments and uncollectible accounts based upon the expected collectibility of accounts receivable, including receivables transferred to the master trust. Credit losses are based on specific identification of uncollectible accounts and application of historical collection percentages by aging category. At June 30, 2003 and December 31, 2002, $85 million and $82 million, respectively, of such allowances had been recorded.

The investors in the master trust have no recourse to BNSF Railway’s other assets except for customary warranty and indemnity claims. Creditors of BNSF Railway have no recourse to the assets of the master trust or SFRC unless and until all claims of their respective creditors have been paid. The A/R sales program includes provisions that, if triggered, allow the investors participating in this program, at their option, to cancel the program. At June 30, 2003, BNSF Railway was in compliance with these provisions.

In January 2003, the Company exercised an option to call $29 million of 2.63 percent mortgage bonds issued by a predecessor company and due January 1, 2010. Cash generated from operations was used to fund the call.

In May 2003, BNSF issued $250 million of 4.30 percent notes due July 1, 2013. The net proceeds of the debt issuance were used for general corporate purposes including the repayment of outstanding commercial paper.

As of June 30, 2003, the Company has $750 million of debt capacity available under its shelf registration.

BNSF issues commercial paper from time to time that is supported by bank revolving credit agreements. At June 30, 2003, there were no bank borrowings against the revolving credit agreements. Outstanding commercial paper balances are considered as reducing the amount of borrowings available under these agreements. As of June 30, 2003, the bank revolving credit agreements allow borrowings of up to $1.2 billion. In June 2003, the Company reduced its $750 million short-term facility to $700 million and extended its expiration date to June 2004. The Company has the ability to have any amounts then outstanding mature as late as June 2005. Also, in June 2003, the Company reduced its $750 million long-term facility to $500 million and extended its expiration date to June 2008. Annual facility fees are currently 0.100 percent and 0.150 percent for the short-term and long-term facilities, respectively. Both rates are subject to change based upon changes in BNSF’s senior unsecured debt ratings. Borrowing rates are based upon: (i) LIBOR plus a spread determined by BNSF’s senior unsecured debt ratings, (ii) money market rates offered at the option of the lenders, or (iii) an alternate base rate. The Company classifies commercial paper as long-term to the extent of its borrowing capacity under these facilities. BNSF must maintain compliance with certain financial covenants under its revolving credit agreements and, at June 30, 2003, the Company was in compliance.

The maturity value of commercial paper outstanding as of June 30, 2003 was $617 million, reducing the total capacity available under the revolving credit agreements to approximately $583 million. Included in the $617 million maturity value of commercial paper is $268 million issued to a consolidated subsidiary of BNSF that is eliminated upon consolidation.

Debt guaranteed by the Company as of June 30, 2003 is as follows (dollar amounts in millions):

(a) – Reflects the maximum amount the Company could recover from a third party other than the counterparty.

Santa Fe Pacific Pipelines, Inc (SFPP), an indirect, wholly-owned subsidiary of BNSF, has a guarantee in connection with its remaining special limited partnership interest in SFPP, L.P. All obligations with respect to the guarantee will cease upon termination of ownership rights which would occur upon a put notice issued by BNSF or the exercise of the call rights by the general partners of SFPP, L.P.

BNSF Railway and another major railroad jointly and severally guarantee $70 million of debt of Kansas City Terminal Intermodal Transportation Corporation, the proceeds of which were used to finance construction of a double track grade separation bridge in Kansas City, Missouri, which is operated and used by Kansas City Terminal Railway Company (KCTRC). BNSF has a 25 percent ownership in KCTRC and accounts for its interest using the equity method of accounting.

The Unified Government of Wyandotte County/Kansas City, Kansas and Westside Intermodal Transportation Corporation

Proceeds of guaranteed debt are being used to finance construction of a bridge that will connect BNSF Railway’s Argentine Yard in Kansas City, Kansas, with the KCTRC mainline tracks in Kansas City, Missouri. The bridge will be operated by KCTRC.

BNSF Railway has agreed to guarantee approximately $85 million of debt, of which $50 million was issued as of June 30, 2003. The proceeds from the debt are being used to construct and operate a 13-mile railroad, which will service several chemical and plastics manufacturing facilities in the Houston, Texas area. In addition, the San Jacinto Partnership used $22 million of the proceeds to repay all of the interim construction advances previously made by BNSF. As discussed in Note 10 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, the San Jacinto Partnership will be consolidated on July 1, 2003.

BNSF Railway guarantees $13 million of other debt and leases. BNSF Railway holds a performance bond and has the option to sub-lease property to recover up to $7 million of the $13 million of guarantees. These guarantees expire between 2008 and 2014.

Other than the performance bond discussed above, there is no collateral held by a third party which BNSF could obtain and liquidate to recover any amounts paid under the above guarantees.

Other than amounts recorded for capitalized obligations, none of the guarantees above are recorded in the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Company. BNSF does not expect performance under these guarantees to have a material effect on the Company in the foreseeable future.

In the ordinary course of business, BNSF enters into agreements with third parties that include indemnification clauses. In general, these clauses are customary for the types of agreements in which they are included. At times, these clauses may involve indemnification for the acts of the Company, its employees and/or agents, indemnification for another party’s acts, indemnification for future events, indemnification based upon a certain standard of performance, indemnification for liabilities arising out of the Company’s use of leased equipment or other property, or other types of indemnification. Due to the uncertainty of whether the events which would trigger the indemnification obligations will ever occur and, if they did, the extent of the liability which would thereby result, the exposure for future indemnification payments cannot be estimated with any amount of certainty. However, the Company does not believe, based on information available, that these indemnity agreements will have a material adverse effect on the Company’s results of operation, financial position or liquidity.

Personal injury claims, including work-related injuries to employees, are a significant expense for the railroad industry. Employees of BNSF are compensated for work-related injuries according to the provisions of the Federal Employers’ Liability Act (FELA). FELA’s system of requiring the finding of fault, coupled with unscheduled awards and reliance on the jury system, contributed to significant increases in expense in past years. BNSF has implemented a number of safety programs to reduce the number of personal injuries as well as the associated claims and personal injury expense.

The Company recognized personal injury expenses of $52 million and $53 million for the three months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002, respectively, and $100 million and $101 million for the six months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002, respectively. BNSF made payments for personal injuries of $98 million during the first six months of 2003. At June 30, 2003, the Company had recorded liabilities of $498 million related to both asserted and unasserted personal injury claims. Of this amount, $200 million is included in current liabilities. BNSF’s liabilities for both asserted and unasserted personal injury claims are undiscounted.

The Company’s operations, as well as those of its competitors, are subject to extensive federal, state and local environmental regulation. BNSF’s operating procedures include practices to protect the environment from the risks inherent in railroad operations, which frequently involve transporting chemicals and other hazardous materials. Additionally, many of BNSF’s land holdings are and have been used for industrial or transportation-related purposes or leased to commercial or industrial companies whose activities may have resulted in discharges onto the property. As a result, BNSF is subject to environmental cleanup and enforcement actions. In particular, the Federal Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act of 1980 (CERCLA), also known as the Superfund law, as well as similar state laws generally impose joint and several liability for cleanup and enforcement costs on current and former owners and operators of a site without regard to fault or the legality of the original conduct. BNSF has been notified that it is a potentially responsible party (PRP) for study and cleanup costs at approximately 30 Superfund sites for which investigation and remediation payments are or will be made or are yet to be determined (the Superfund sites) and, in many instances, is one of several PRPs. In addition, BNSF may be considered a PRP under certain other laws. Accordingly, under CERCLA and other federal and state statutes, BNSF may be held jointly and severally liable for all environmental costs associated with a particular site. If there are other PRPs, BNSF generally participates in the cleanup of these sites through cost-sharing agreements with terms that vary from site to site. Costs are typically allocated based on relative volumetric contribution of material, the amount of time the site was owned or operated, and/or the portion of the total site owned or operated by each PRP.

Environmental costs include initial site surveys and environmental studies of potentially contaminated sites as well as costs for remediation and restoration of sites determined to be contaminated. Liabilities for environmental cleanup costs are initially recorded when BNSF’s liability for environmental cleanup is both probable and a reasonable estimate of associated costs can be made. Adjustments to initial estimates are recorded as necessary based upon additional information developed in subsequent periods. BNSF conducts an ongoing environmental contingency analysis, which considers a combination of factors including independent consulting reports, site visits, legal reviews, analysis of the likelihood of participation in and the ability of other PRPs to pay for cleanup, and historical trend analyses.

BNSF is involved in a number of administrative and judicial proceedings and other mandatory cleanup efforts at approximately 420 sites, including the Superfund sites, at which it is participating in the study or cleanup, or both, of alleged environmental contamination. The Company recognized environmental expenses of $16 million and $9 million for the three months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002, respectively, and $31 million and $19 million for the six months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002, respectively. BNSF paid $32 million during the first six months of 2003 for mandatory and unasserted cleanup efforts, including amounts expended under federal and state voluntary cleanup

programs. BNSF has recorded liabilities for remediation and restoration of all known sites of $195 million at June 30, 2003. Of this amount, $48 million is included in current liabilities. BNSF’s environmental liabilities are not discounted. BNSF anticipates that the majority of the accrued costs at June 30, 2003, will be paid over the next five years and no individual site is considered to be material.

Liabilities recorded for environmental costs represent BNSF’s best estimates for remediation and restoration of these sites and include both asserted and unasserted claims. Unasserted claims are not considered to be a material component of the liability. Although recorded liabilities include BNSF’s best estimates of all costs, without reduction for anticipated recoveries from third parties, BNSF’s total cleanup costs at these sites cannot be predicted with certainty due to various factors such as the extent of corrective actions that may be required, evolving environmental laws and regulations, advances in environmental technology, the extent of other parties’ participation in cleanup efforts, developments in ongoing environmental analyses related to sites determined to be contaminated, and developments in environmental surveys and studies of potentially contaminated sites. As a result, future charges to income for environmental liabilities could have a significant effect on results of operations in a particular quarter or fiscal year as individual site studies and remediation and restoration efforts proceed or as new sites arise. However, management believes it is unlikely any identified matters, either individually or in the aggregate, will have a material adverse effect on BNSF’s results of operations, financial position or liquidity.

BNSF and its subsidiaries are parties to a number of legal actions and claims, various governmental proceedings and private civil suits arising in the ordinary course of business, including those related to environmental matters, Federal Employers’ Liability Act claims by BNSF Railway employees, other personal injury claims, and disputes and complaints involving certain transportation rates and charges (including complaints seeking refunds of prior charges paid for coal transportation and the prescription of future rates for such movements). Some of the legal proceedings include claims for punitive as well as compensatory damages, and a few proceedings purport to be class actions. While the final outcome of these matters cannot be predicted with certainty, considering among other things the meritorious legal defenses available and liabilities that have been recorded along with applicable insurance, it is the opinion of BNSF’s management that none of these items, when finally resolved, will have a material adverse effect on the results of operations, financial position or liquidity of BNSF, although an adverse resolution of a number of these items could have a material adverse effect on the results of operations in a particular quarter or fiscal year.

Employee merger and separation liabilities of $191 million are included in the Consolidated Balance Sheets at June 30, 2003, and principally represent: (i) deferred benefits payable upon separation or retirement to certain active conductors, trainmen and locomotive engineers; (ii) employee-related severance costs for the consolidation of clerical functions, material handlers in mechanical shops and trainmen on reserve boards; and (iii) certain non-union employee severance costs. Employee merger and separation expenses are recorded in Materials and other in the Consolidated Income Statements. At June 30, 2003, $35 million of the remaining liabilities are included in current liabilities for anticipated costs to be paid over the next twelve months.

Liabilities related to deferred benefits payable upon separation or retirement to certain active conductors, trainmen and locomotive engineers were $158 million at June 30, 2003. These costs were primarily incurred in connection with labor agreements reached prior to the consummation of the business combination of BNSF’s predecessor companies Burlington Northern Inc. and Santa Fe Pacific Corporation (the Merger) which, among other things, reduced train crew sizes and allowed for more flexible work rules. The remaining costs will be paid between 2003 and approximately 2024.

Liabilities related to the consolidation of clerical functions were $15 million at June 30, 2003, and primarily provide for severance costs associated with the clerical consolidation plan adopted in 1995 upon the Merger. The consolidation plan resulted in the elimination of approximately 1,500 permanent positions and was substantially completed during 1999. The liability also includes costs related to the reduction of approximately 40 and 140 material handlers in 2001 and 2000, respectively.

During the first six months of 2003, the Company recorded a $1 million reversal for certain liabilities associated with the consolidation of clerical functions. These reversals primarily reflect accrued payments related to workforce reductions for positions under collective bargaining agreements where the Company was able to place affected individuals in alternate positions. The remaining liability balance at June 30, 2003, represents benefits to be paid to affected employees who did not receive lump-sum payments, but instead will be paid over five to ten years or in some cases through retirement.

Liabilities principally related to certain remaining non-union employee severances resulting from the fourth quarter 2001 workforce reduction, the second quarter 1999 reorganization, and the Merger were $18 million at June 30, 2003. These costs will be paid over the next several years based on deferral elections made by the employees.

During the first six months of 2003, BNSF repurchased 5 million shares of its common stock at an average price of $26.29 per share under the Company’s share repurchase program amounting to a total cost of $123 million. Program-to-date repurchases through June 30, 2003, were 120 million shares at an average price of $25.98 per share, leaving 30 million shares available for repurchase out of the 150 million shares authorized.

Basic earnings per share is based on the weighted average number of common shares outstanding. Diluted earnings per share is based on basic earnings per share adjusted for the effect of potential common shares outstanding that were dilutive during the period, arising from employee stock awards and incremental shares calculated using the treasury stock method.

Weighted average stock options totaling 26.8 million and 31.1 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2003, respectively, and 25.5 million and 25.6 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2002, respectively, were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share because the options’ exercise price exceeded the average market price of the Company’s stock for those periods.

In 2001, the Company entered into a partnership (the Partnership) with subsidiaries of three chemical manufacturing companies that ship their products on the BNSF Railway to form San Jacinto Rail Ltd. The purpose of this Partnership is to construct and operate a 13-mile railroad, which will service several chemical and plastics manufacturing facilities in the Houston, Texas, area. BNSF owns a 48 percent limited partnership interest and a one percent general partnership interest in the Partnership and acts as the general partner and operator of this facility. The Company has determined that San Jacinto Rail Ltd., a previously unconsolidated subsidiary, will be required to be consolidated pursuant to Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Interpretation No. 46 (FIN 46), Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities on July 1, 2003. This consolidation will have a minimal impact to the Company’s financial statements due to the fact that the Company accounted for this investment prior to the adoption of FIN 46 under the equity method of accounting and recorded all losses incurred by the Partnership from inception to date as required by the partnership agreement. The Partnership qualifies as a variable interest entity and the Company is the primary beneficiary.

BNSF Railway has agreed to guarantee debt incurred by the Partnership, which is expected to be $85 million in connection with the construction of this rail line, of which $50 million was outstanding as of June 30, 2003. See Note 5 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for information about BNSF Railway’s guarantee of the Partnership’s debt.

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP’s review report is included in this quarterly report; however, they do not express an opinion on the unaudited financial information. Accordingly, such report is not a “report” or “part of a registration statement” within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of the Securities Act of 1933 and PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP is not subject to the liability provisions of Section 11 of such Act.

We have reviewed the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of Burlington Northern Santa Fe Corporation and its subsidiaries (“BNSF” or the “Company”) as of June 30, 2003, and the related consolidated statements of income for each of the three-month and six-month periods ended June 30, 2003 and 2002 and the consolidated statements of cash flows for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2003 and 2002. These interim financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management.

We conducted our review in accordance with standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. A review of interim financial information consists principally of applying analytical procedures and making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and accounting matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards, the objective of which is the expression of an opinion regarding the financial statements taken as a whole. Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.

Based on our review, we are not aware of any material modifications that should be made to the accompanying consolidated interim financial statements for them to be in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

We previously audited, in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America, the consolidated balance sheet of the Company as of December 31, 2002, and the related consolidated statements of income, cash flows, and changes in stockholders’ equity for the year then ended (not presented herein), and in our report dated February 6, 2003 we expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements. In our opinion, the information set forth in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of the Company as of June 30, 2003, is fairly stated in all material respects in relation to the consolidated balance sheet from which it has been derived.

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Management’s discussion and analysis relates to the financial condition and results of operations of Burlington Northern Santa Fe Corporation and its majority-owned subsidiaries (collectively BNSF, Registrant or Company). The principal operating subsidiary of BNSF is The Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Company (BNSF Railway). All earnings per share information is stated on a diluted basis.

Three Months Ended June 30, 2003 Compared with Three Months Ended June 30, 2002

BNSF recorded net income for the second quarter of 2003 of $200 million, or $0.54 per share compared with second quarter 2002 net income of $194 million, or $0.51 per share. Operating income of $412 million for the second quarter of 2003 was $9 million lower than the second quarter of 2002.

The following table presents BNSF’s revenue information by commodity group for the three months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002:

Freight revenues for the second quarter of 2003 were $2.3 billion, up 4 percent compared with the same 2002 period. Freight revenues in the second quarter of 2003 included increased fuel surcharges, including rate index increases, of $24 million compared with the prior year. Average revenue per car/unit decreased 1 percent in the second quarter of 2003 to $1,063 from $1,072 in the second quarter of 2002.

Consumer Products revenues of $911 million for the second quarter of 2003 were $63 million, or 7 percent, greater than the second quarter of 2002. The increase in Consumer Products revenue is primarily due to increased volumes in the international, truckload and perishables sectors driven by market share gains and growth in existing business. The reduction in average revenue per unit of 2 percent is primarily related to double-digit growth in the international sector, which has lower average revenue per unit.

Industrial Products revenues decreased $4 million, or 1 percent, to $531 million for the second quarter of 2003. Revenue gains in both the building products and construction products sectors were more than offset by weak demand in the petroleum products and chemical and plastics products sectors. Rate increases along with fuel surcharges contributed to a 5 percent increase in average revenue per car.

Coal revenues of $504 million for the second quarter of 2003 increased $16 million, or 3 percent, versus the same period a year ago. The increase is a result of slightly stronger utility demand and index-driven rate increases, which also helped increase the average revenue per car 2 percent.

Agricultural Products revenues of $317 million for the second quarter of 2003 were $5 million, or 2 percent, higher than revenues for the second quarter of 2002. Revenues were up largely due to increased ethanol shipments from plants in the Midwest to California and increased shipments of a by-product of ethanol processing. Average revenue per car is down 3 percent due to high volumes of new shorter haul corn business.

Total operating expenses for the second quarter of 2003 were $1,882 million, an increase of $96 million, or 5 percent, versus the same 2002 period primarily related to fuel expense, higher volumes handled and lower gains from property dispositions.

Fuel expenses of $263 million for the second quarter of 2003 were $56 million, or 27 percent, higher than the second quarter of 2002. The increase in fuel expense was primarily the result of a 16-cent ($46 million) increase in the average all-in cost per gallon of diesel fuel. The increase in the average all-in cost per gallon of diesel fuel includes a 16-cent increase ($46 million) in the average purchase price and a hedge benefit of 3-cents ($7 million). The hedge benefit for the same period in 2002 was 3-cents per gallon ($7 million). Consumption in the second quarter of 2003 was 297 million gallons, an increase of 5 percent compared with the same 2002 period.

Compensation and benefits expenses of $699 million were $1 million, or less than 1 percent, higher than the second quarter of 2002. This increase primarily reflects higher volumes and inflation substantially offset by lower headcount and incentive compensation accruals.

Purchased services of $312 million for the second quarter of 2003 were $30 million, or 11 percent, higher than the second quarter of 2002. This primarily reflects higher IT outsourcing costs as a result of the computing infrastructure outsourcing agreement entered into in 2002 and increased locomotive maintenance costs and logistics related services.

Depreciation and amortization expenses of $225 million for the second quarter of 2003 were $6 million, or 3 percent, lower than the same period in 2002, primarily due to the implementation of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 143 as well as new depreciation rates for locomotives partially offset by normal capital expenditure increases.

Equipment rents expenses for the second quarter of 2003 of $180 million were $3 million, or 2 percent, higher than the second quarter of 2002. The increase is primarily due to additional locomotives under lease.

Materials and other expenses of $203 million for the second quarter of 2003 were $12 million, or 6 percent, higher than the second quarter of 2002 principally due to lower gains from property dispositions partially offset by decreased locomotive material costs.

Interest expense of $106 million for the second quarter of 2003 was $1 million higher than the second quarter of 2002. This increase was primarily the result of higher average debt outstanding partially offset by lower average interest rates and a higher net interest rate hedge benefit.

The effective tax rate for the second quarter of 2003 was 34.0 percent compared to 37.5 percent for the prior year period. The decrease in the effective tax rate primarily reflects a tax settlement attributable to prior years that settled favorably in the second quarter of 2003.

BNSF recorded net income for the first six months of 2003 of $387 million, or $1.04 per share after the cumulative effect of an accounting change of $39 million, net of tax, or $0.10 per diluted share, compared with the first six months of 2002 net income of $366 million, or $0.95 per share. Operating income of $758 million for the first six months of 2003 was $43 million lower than the first six months of 2002.

The cumulative effect of an accounting change was the result of adopting SFAS No. 143, Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations. The $39 million, net of tax, represents the cumulative effect of adopting SFAS No. 143 for years prior to 2003. The Company anticipates that the adoption of SFAS No. 143 will have an insignificant impact on full year 2003 Income before cumulative effect of accounting change. See Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

The following table presents BNSF’s revenue information by commodity group for the six months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002:

Freight revenues for the first six months of 2003 were $4.5 billion, up 3 percent compared with the same 2002 period. Freight revenues in the first six months of 2003 included increased fuel surcharges, including rate index increases, of $43 million compared with the prior year. Average revenue per car/unit decreased 2 percent in the first six months of 2003 to $1,070 from $1,090 in the first six months of 2002.

Consumer Products revenues of $1,759 million for the first six months of 2003 were $133 million, or 8 percent, greater than the first six months of 2002. The increase in Consumer Products revenue is primarily due to increased volumes in the international, truckload and perishables sectors. The reduction in revenue per unit of 3 percent is primarily related to the double-digit growth in the international sector, which has lower average revenue per unit.

Industrial Products revenues increased $16 million, or 2 percent, to $1,042 million for the first six months of 2003. The revenue increase is primarily due to increased traffic in the construction products sector and increased military, lumber and paper traffic in the building products sector, which were somewhat offset by lower plastics traffic. Rate increases along with some fuel surcharges contributed to a 3 percent increase in average revenue per car.

Coal revenues of $989 million for the first six months of 2003 decreased $7 million, or less than 1 percent, versus the same period a year ago. The decrease is a result of lower volumes from the first quarter draw-down of utility stockpiles and plant shutdowns offset by slightly stronger second quarter demand. The increase in average revenue per car of 1 percent is primarily related to index-driven rate increases.

Agricultural Products revenues of $675 million for the first six months of 2003 were $2 million higher than revenues for the first six months of 2002. This increase is primarily due to increased ethanol and animal feeds shipments offset by lower overall corn and wheat exports to the Pacific Northwest and Gulf of Mexico. The decrease in revenue per unit of 2 percent is primarily due to an overall decrease in average length of haul also caused by the reduced exports.

Total operating expenses for the first six months of 2003 were $3,768 million, an increase of $199 million, or 6 percent, versus the same 2002 period primarily related to fuel expense, higher volumes handled and lower gains from property dispositions.

Fuel expenses of $537 million for the first six months of 2003 were $146 million, or 37 percent, higher than the first six months of 2002. The increase in fuel expense was primarily the result of a 22-cent ($130 million) increase in the average all-in cost per gallon of diesel fuel. The increase in the average all-in cost per gallon of diesel fuel includes a 27-cent increase ($158 million) in the average purchase price and a hedge benefit of 5-cents ($32 million). The hedge benefit for the same period in 2002 was less than 1-cent per gallon ($4 million). Consumption in the first six months of 2003 was 589 million gallons, an increase of 4 percent compared with the same 2002 period.

Compensation and benefits expenses of $1,416 million were flat as compared to the first six months of 2002. Higher volumes and inflation were offset by lower headcount and incentive compensation accruals.

Purchased services of $613 million for the first six months of 2003 were $56 million, or 10 percent, higher than the first six months of 2002. This primarily reflects higher IT outsourcing costs as a result of the computing infrastructure outsourcing agreement entered into in 2002 and increased locomotive maintenance costs and logistics related services.

Depreciation and amortization expenses of $451 million for the first six months of 2003 were $10 million, or 2 percent, lower than the same period in 2002, primarily due to the implementation of SFAS No. 143 as well as new depreciation rates for locomotives partially offset by normal capital expenditure increases.

Equipment rents expenses for the first six months of 2003 of $349 million were $3 million, or less than 1 percent, lower than the first six months of 2002. The decrease is primarily due to increased utilization of BNSF owned and leased equipment.

Materials and other expenses of $402 million for the first six months of 2003 were $10 million, or 3 percent, higher than the first six months of 2002 principally due to lower gains from property dispositions partially offset by decreased locomotive material costs.

Interest expense of $212 million for the first six months of 2003 was $2 million, or 1 percent, lower than the first six months of 2002. This decrease was primarily the result of lower average interest rates and a higher net interest rate hedge benefit partially offset by higher average debt outstanding.

The effective tax rate for the first six months of 2003 was 35.8 percent compared to 37.5 percent for the prior year period. The decrease in the effective tax rate primarily reflects a tax settlement attributable to prior years that settled favorably in the second quarter of 2003.

Cash generated from operations is BNSF’s principal source of liquidity. BNSF generally funds any additional liquidity requirements through debt issuance, including commercial paper, through leasing of assets and through the sale of a portion of accounts receivable.

Net cash provided by operating activities was $891 million for the six months ended June 30, 2003, compared with $882 million for the six months ended June 30, 2002. The increase was primarily the result of lower employee merger and separation costs paid and changes in working capital, partially offset by lower net income before the cumulative effect of adopting SFAS No. 143.

Net cash used for investing activities was $867 million for the six months ended June 30, 2003, compared with $739 million for the six months ended June 30, 2002. Investing activities for the six months ended June 30, 2003, include $835 million of capital expenditures, as discussed below, and $32 million of other investing activities. The decrease in the use of cash for other investing activities primarily reflects decreases in capitalized expenditures for retired track structure removal costs as a result of the implementation of SFAS No. 143.

A breakdown of cash capital expenditures for the six months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002, is set forth in the following table (in millions):

The increase in cash capital expenditures in the first six months of 2003 is primarily related to new locomotive acquisitions.

Planned capital expenditures for 2003 disclosed in BNSF’s Annual Report on Form 10-K were approximately $1.4 billion. The plan has been updated to slightly over $1.6 billion, primarily due to $156 million of locomotive acquisitions, which were originally planned to be leased, as well as an increase in planned expansion capital expenditures related to continuing strong growth and outlook in the Company’s intermodal sectors.

BNSF has agreed to acquire 915 locomotives by 2008. Through June 30, 2003, BNSF has acquired 201 of the 915 locomotives. The 201 acquired locomotives were financed through a combination of operating leases and cash from operations. The remaining locomotives under these agreements will be financed from one or a combination of sources including, but not limited to, cash from operations, capital or operating leases and debt issuances. The decision on the method used for particular acquisition financings will depend on market conditions and other factors.

Net cash used for financing activities during the first six months of 2003 was $9 million, primarily related to additional net borrowings of $188 million and proceeds from stock options exercised of $18 million, more than offset by common stock repurchases of $123 million and dividend payments of $89 million.

Aggregate debt due to mature within one year is $153 million. BNSF’s ratio of net debt to total capital (net debt is calculated as total debt less Cash and cash equivalents, and capitalization is calculated as the sum of net debt and Total stockholders’ equity) was 46.2 percent at June 30, 2003 compared to 46.1 at December 31, 2002.

As of June 30, 2003, the Company has $750 million of debt capacity available under its shelf registration.

In June 2002, BNSF issued $300 million of 5.90 percent notes due July 1, 2012. The net proceeds of the debt issuance were used for general corporate purposes including the repayment of outstanding commercial paper.

Common stock dividends declared for the six months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002, were $0.24 per share, respectively. Dividends paid on common stock during the first six months of 2003 and 2002 were $89 million and $92 million, respectively. On April 17, 2003, the Board of Directors (the Board) declared a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share on outstanding shares of common stock, $0.01 par value, payable July 1, 2003, to stockholders of record on June 10, 2003. On July 17, 2003, the Board approved a dividend increase and declared a quarterly common stock dividend of $0.15 per share on its outstanding shares of common stock, $0.01 par value, payable October 1, 2003 to shareholders of record on September 10, 2003.

In July 1997, the Board authorized the repurchase of up to 30 million shares of the Company’s common stock from time to time in the open market. In December 1999, April 2000, September 2000 and January 2003, the Board authorized extensions of the BNSF share repurchase program, adding 30 million shares at each date to the total shares previously authorized bringing BNSF’s share repurchase program to 150 million shares.

The Company’s business is capital intensive. BNSF has historically generated a significant amount of cash from operating activities which it uses to fund capital additions, service debt, repurchase shares and pay dividends. Additionally, the Company relies on access to the debt and leasing markets to finance a portion of capital additions on a long-term basis.

In the normal course of business, the Company enters into long-term contractual requirements for future goods and services needed for the operations of the business. Such commitments are not in excess of expected requirements and are not reasonably likely to result in performance penalties or payments that would have a material adverse effect on the Company’s liquidity.

BNSF issues commercial paper from time to time that is supported by bank revolving credit agreements. At June 30, 2003, there were no borrowings against the revolving credit agreements. Outstanding commercial paper balances are considered as reducing the amount of borrowings available under these agreements. As of June 30,

2003, the bank revolving credit agreements allow borrowings of up to $1.2 billion. In June 2003, the Company reduced its $750 million short-term facility to $700 million and extended its expiration date to June 2004. The Company has the ability to have any amounts then outstanding mature as late as June 2005. Also, in June 2003, the Company reduced its $750 million long-term facility to $500 million and extended its expiration date to June 2008. Annual facility fees are currently 0.100 percent and 0.150 percent for the short-term and long-term facilities, respectively. Both rates are subject to change based upon changes in BNSF’s senior unsecured debt ratings. Borrowing rates are based upon: (i) LIBOR plus a spread determined by BNSF’s senior unsecured debt ratings, (ii) money market rates offered at the option of the lenders, or (iii) an alternate base rate. The Company classifies commercial paper as long-term to the extent of its borrowing capacity under these facilities. BNSF must maintain compliance with certain financial covenants under its revolving credit agreements and, at June 30, 2003, the Company was in compliance.

The accounts receivable sales program of Santa Fe Receivables Corporation (SFRC), as described in Note 4 of the Consolidated Financial Statements, includes various provisions that, if triggered, would allow the investors participating in this program, at their option, to cancel the program. SFRC renewed $350 million of the $700 million accounts receivables facility, effective in June 2003, for an additional 364 days. In addition, SFRC entered into a separate $350 million receivables facility, effective in June 2003, with a five-year term. The commitment of the investors to purchase undivided interests under the A/R facilities is currently scheduled to expire in June 2004 and June 2008, respectively. At June 30, 2003, investor interests of $625 million were outstanding under the $700 million accounts receivable facilities.

From July 1, 2003 through July 25, 2003, the Company entered into additional swap and costless collar agreements utilizing NYMEX #2 Heating Oil (HO) and West Texas Intermediate (WTI) crude oil. The supporting tables below provide fuel hedge data for hedges entered into subsequent to the end of the second quarter period.

Approximately 87 percent of BNSF Railway’s employees are union-represented. BNSF Railway’s union employees work under collective bargaining agreements with 13 different labor organizations. The negotiating process for new, major collective bargaining agreements covering all of BNSF Railway’s union employees has been underway since the bargaining round was initiated November 1, 1999. Wages, health and welfare benefits, work rules, and other issues have traditionally been addressed through industry-wide negotiations. These negotiations have generally taken place over a number of months and have previously not resulted in any extended work stoppages. The existing agreements have remained in effect and will continue to remain in effect until new agreements are reached or the Railway Labor Act’s procedures (which include mediation, cooling-off periods, and the possibility of Presidential intervention) are exhausted. The current agreements provide for periodic wage increases until new agreements are reached.

In June 2003, the National Carriers’ Conference Committee (NCCC), BNSF’s multi-employer collective bargaining representative, reached a tentative agreement with the Brotherhood of Railroad Signalmen (BRS) resolving wage, work rule and benefit issues through 2004, incorporating terms similar to those in the Transportation Communications Union (TCU) settlement. The agreement is subject to ratification by the union’s members, a process likely to be concluded in September 2003. BRS represents BNSF’s signal system maintenance employees, approximately 5 percent of the unionized workforce.

In late 2002, the NCCC reached a procedural agreement with the TCU providing for final and binding arbitration of wage and benefit issues through 2004. This agreement averted the possibility of self help by the parties over bargaining round issues. The arbitrator conducted hearings in the case commencing January 20, 2003, and issued a final and binding decision on January 23, 2003. The arbitration result led to formal agreements signed by the parties in March 2003, which have settled wage, work rule and medical benefit issues between the participating railroads and TCU, through 2004. TCU represents BNSF’s clerks, carmen and patrolmen, who make up about 15 percent of BNSF’s unionized workforce.

In October 2002, the NCCC and International Brotherhood of Boilermakers and Blacksmiths (IBB) made a final agreement resolving wage and work rule issues through 2004, but leaving health and welfare benefit issues to be settled based on the outcome of the bargaining round process with other rail labor unions. IBB represents around 100 BNSF employees, less than 1 percent of the unionized workforce.

The NCCC reached a final agreement in August 2002, with the United Transportation Union (UTU) covering wage, work rule, and locomotive remote control issues through the year 2004 for conductors, brakemen, yardmen, yardmasters and firemen, which represent approximately 30 percent of BNSF’s unionized workforce. The agreement also creates a final and binding process for resolving health and welfare issues, mainly involving employees sharing in rising benefit costs. The agreement commits each side to participate in a study and negotiation period, during which the parties would examine alternative ways to control rising healthcare costs. The parties have met extensively on this issue in the first half of 2003, in an effort to reach a definitive agreement on the solution. Failing these efforts, BNSF and the other participating railroads will likely send unresolved health and welfare issues with UTU to final and binding arbitration.

In June 2001, the NCCC reached a tentative agreement with the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers (IBEW), which represents approximately 5 percent of BNSF’s unionized workforce, addressing wage and work rule issues through 2004, but leaving health and welfare benefit issues for settlement in separate talks with other railroad unions. IBEW members failed to ratify the tentative agreement.

In spring 2001, the NCCC and Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employees (BMWE) reached an agreement resolving wage, work rule and benefit issues through 2004, which was implemented in July 2001. BMWE represents BNSF’s track, bridge and building maintenance employees, or about one-fifth of BNSF’s unionized workforce.

To the extent that statements made by the Company relate to the Company’s future economic performance or business outlook, projections or expectations of financial or operational results, or refer to matters that are not historical facts, such statements are “forward-looking” statements within the meaning of the federal securities laws. Forward-looking statements involve a number of risks and uncertainties, and actual results may differ materially. Important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially include, but are not limited to, economic and industry conditions: material adverse changes in economic or industry conditions, both in the United States and globally, customer demand, effects of adverse economic conditions affecting shippers, adverse economic conditions in the industries and geographic areas that produce and consume freight, competition and consolidation within the transportation industry, the extent to which BNSF is successful in gaining new long-term relationships with customers or retaining existing ones, changes in fuel prices, changes in the securities and capital markets, and changes in labor costs and labor difficulties, including stoppages affecting either BNSF’s operations or our customers’ abilities to deliver goods to BNSF for shipment; legal and regulatory factors: developments and changes in laws and regulations and the ultimate outcome of shipper and rate claims subject to adjudication, environmental investigations or proceedings and other types of claims and litigation; and operating factors: technical difficulties, changes in operating conditions and costs, competition, and commodity concentrations, the Company’s ability to achieve its operational and financial initiatives and to contain costs, as well as natural events such as severe weather, floods and earthquakes or other disruptions of BNSF Railway’s operating systems, structures, or equipment.

The Company cautions against placing undue reliance on forward-looking statements, which reflect its current beliefs and are based on information currently available to it as of the date a forward-looking statement is made. The Company undertakes no obligation to revise forward-looking statements to reflect future events, changes in circumstances, or changes in beliefs. In the event the Company does update any forward-looking statement, no inference should be made that the Company will make additional updates with respect to that statement, related matters, or any other forward-looking statements. Any corrections or revisions may appear in the Company’s public filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, which are accessible at www.sec.gov and on the Company’s website at www.bnsf.com, and which investors are advised to consult.

In the ordinary course of business, BNSF utilizes various financial instruments that inherently have some degree of market risk. The qualitative and quantitative information presented in Notes 2 and 5 of the Consolidated Financial Statements describe significant aspects of BNSF’s financial instrument programs which have a material market risk.

BNSF has a program to hedge against fluctuations in the price of its diesel fuel purchases. Existing hedge transactions as of June 30, 2003, are based on the front month settlement prices of West Texas Intermediate crude oil (WTI) and NYMEX #2 heating oil (HO). For swaps, BNSF either pays or receives the difference between the hedge price and the actual average price of the hedge commodity during a specified determination period for a specified number of gallons. For costless collars, if the average hedge commodity price for a specified determination period is greater than the cap price, BNSF receives the difference for a specified number of gallons. If the average commodity price is less than the floor price, BNSF pays the difference for a specified number of gallons. If the commodity price is between the floor price and the cap price, BNSF neither makes nor receives a payment. Hedge

transactions are generally settled with the counterparty in cash. Based on historical information, BNSF believes there is a significant correlation between the market prices for diesel fuel, WTI, and HO. See Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for fuel hedging information.

The tables below provide information about BNSF’s diesel fuel hedging instruments that are sensitive to changes in diesel fuel prices, and present notional amounts in gallons and the weighted average contract prices by contractual maturity date. The prices included in the tables below do not include taxes, transportation costs, certain other fuel handling costs and any differences which may occur between the prices of commodities hedged and the purchase price of BNSF’s diesel fuel. In addition, WTI prices do not include refining costs.

At June 30, 2003, BNSF maintained fuel inventories for use in normal operations which were not material to BNSF’s overall financial position and, therefore, represent no significant market exposure.

The Company entered into fuel hedge transactions between July 1, 2003 and July 21, 2003. See Other Matters: Fuel Hedges in Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

From time to time, BNSF enters into various interest rate-hedging transactions for purposes of managing exposure to fluctuations in interest rates and establishing rates in anticipation of future debt issuances as well as to convert a portion of its fixed-rate long-term debt to floating-rate debt. BNSF’s measurement of fair value of interest rate swaps is based on estimates of the mid-market values for the transactions provided by the counterparties to these agreements.

As discussed in Note 2 in the Consolidated Financial Statements, the Company uses several types of interest rate swaps to minimize exposure to risk. These swaps are accounted for either as cash flow or fair value hedges as required under SFAS No. 133.

All swap transactions outstanding with an interest rate component are reflected in the table below.

At June 30, 2003, the Company had no outstanding interest rate cash flow hedges or treasury locks.

Based on their evaluation as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, BNSF’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer have concluded that BNSF’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) are effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by BNSF in the reports that it files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms.

See Index to Exhibits on page E-1 for a description of the exhibits filed as part of this report.

Registrant filed a report on Form 8-K on April 22, 2003, reporting under Item 12 a press release announcing first quarter operating results.

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

BURLINGTON NORTHERN SANTA FE CORPORATION (Registrant)

By:		/s/ Thomas N. Hund
		Thomas N. Hund Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (On behalf of the Registrant and as principal financial officer)

	June 30, 2003			December 31, 2002
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	43		$	28
Accounts receivable, net		148			141
Materials and supplies		229			226
Current portion of deferred income taxes		304			314
Other current assets		115			82

Total current assets		839			791

Property and equipment, net		24,541			24,022
Other assets		999			954

Total assets	$	26,379		$	25,767


LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable and other current liabilities	$	1,898		$	1,918
Long-term debt due within one year		153			173

Total current liabilities		2,051			2,091

Long-term debt and commercial paper		6,876			6,641
Deferred income taxes		7,180			6,975
Casualty and environmental liabilities		445			444
Minimum pension liability		368			368
Employee merger and separation costs		156			170
Other liabilities		1,154			1,146

Total liabilities		18,230			17,835

Commitments and contingencies (see Notes 2, 5, and 6)
Stockholders’ equity:
Common stock, $.01 par value, 600,000 shares authorized; 498,552 shares and 496,683 shares issued, respectively		5			5
Additional paid-in capital		5,707			5,664
Retained earnings		5,922			5,625
Treasury stock, at cost, 125,728 shares and 120,905 shares, respectively		(3,240	)		(3,114	)
Unearned compensation		(46	)		(39	)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss		(199	)		(209	)

Total stockholders’ equity		8,149			7,932

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	26,379		$	25,767

	Six Months Ended June 30,
	2003			2002
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net income	$	387		$	366
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization		451			461
Deferred income taxes		183			190
Employee merger and separation costs paid		(18	)		(31	)
Cumulative effect of accounting change, net of tax		(39	)		—
Other, net		(17	)		(33	)
Changes in current assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable, net		(7	)		(25	)
Materials and supplies		(3	)		(15	)
Other current assets		(17	)		(46	)
Accounts payable and other current liabilities		(29	)		15

Net cash provided by operating activities		891			882

INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Capital expenditures		(835	)		(641	)
Other, net		(32	)		(98	)

Net cash used for investing activities		(867	)		(739	)

FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Net increase in commercial paper and bank borrowings		29			41
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt		265			300
Payments on long-term debt		(106	)		(74	)
Dividends paid		(89	)		(92	)
Proceeds from stock options exercised		18			35
Purchase of BNSF common stock		(123	)		(199	)
Other, net		(3	)		(2	)

Net cash provided by (used for) financing activities		(9	)		9

Increase in cash and cash equivalents		15			152
Cash and cash equivalents:
Beginning of period		28			26

End of period	$	43		$	178

SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW INFORMATION
Interest paid, net of amounts capitalized	$	221		$	235
Income taxes paid (refunded), net	$	(6	)	$	40

	Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
	2003		2002		2003		2002
	(in millions)
Net income as reported	$	200	$	194	$	387	$	366
Pro forma net income	$	200	$	189	$	348	$	359


Earnings per share
Basic – as reported	$	0.54	$	0.51	$	1.05	$	0.96

Basic – pro forma	$	0.54	$	0.50	$	0.94	$	0.94


Diluted – as reported	$	0.54	$	0.51	$	1.04	$	0.95

Diluted – pro forma	$	0.54	$	0.49	$	0.93	$	0.94

	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2003			2002			2003			2002
	(in millions)
Net income, as reported	$	200		$	194		$	387		$	366

Stock-based employee compensation expense included in reported net income, net of related tax effects		3			3			4			4

Total stock-based compensation expense determined under fair value method for all awards, net of related tax effects		(10	)		(10	)		(16	)		(14	)

Pro forma net income	$	193		$	187		$	375		$	356


Earnings per share:
Basic – as reported	$	0.54		$	0.51		$	1.05		$	0.96

Basic – pro forma	$	0.52		$	0.49		$	1.01		$	0.93


Diluted – as reported	$	0.54		$	0.51		$	1.04		$	0.95

Diluted – pro forma	$	0.52		$	0.49		$	1.01		$	0.93

	Quarter Ended				Total
2003	September 30,		December 31,		Total
WTI Swaps
Barrels hedged (in thousands)		600		600		1,200
Equivalent gallons hedged (in millions)		25.20		25.20		50.40
Average swap price (per barrel)	$	20.59	$	20.67	$	20.63
Fair value (in millions)	$	5	$	5	$	10

WTI Collars
Barrels hedged (in thousands)		1,800		1,650		3,450
Equivalent gallons hedged (in millions)		75.60		69.30		144.90
Average cap price (per barrel)	$	26.52	$	25.92	$	26.24
Average floor price (per barrel)	$	22.14	$	21.52	$	21.84
Fair value (in millions)	$	6	$	5	$	11


	Quarter Ended								Annual
2004	March 31,		June 30,		September 30,		December 31,		Annual
WTI Swaps
Barrels hedged (in thousands)		525		525		525		675		2,250
Equivalent gallons hedged (in millions)		22.05		22.05		22.05		28.35		94.50
Average swap price (per barrel)	$	20.68	$	20.64	$	20.61	$	21.34	$	20.85
Fair value (in millions)	$	3	$	3	$	3	$	2	$	11

WTI Collars
Barrels hedged (in thousands)		1,500		2,700		2,550		2,400		9,150
Equivalent gallons hedged (in millions)		63.00		113.40		107.10		100.80		384.30
Average cap price (per barrel)	$	27.06	$	26.54	$	26.15	$	25.88	$	26.34
Average floor price (per barrel)	$	22.50	$	21.99	$	21.57	$	21.30	$	21.78
Fair value (in millions)	$	2	$	3	$	3	$	2	$	10


	Quarter Ended								Annual
2005	March 31,		June 30,		September 30,		December 31,		Annual
WTI Swaps
Barrels hedged (in thousands)		375		375		525		525		1,800
Equivalent gallons hedged (in millions)		15.75		15.75		22.05		22.05		75.60
Average swap price (per barrel)	$	23.93	$	23.82	$	23.97	$	23.89	$	23.91
Fair value (in millions)	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—

WTI Collars
Barrels hedged (in thousands)		2,475		2,325		1,650		975		7,425
Equivalent gallons hedged (in millions)		103.95		97.65		69.30		40.95		311.85
Average cap price (per barrel)	$	25.75	$	25.64	$	25.48	$	25.12	$	25.57
Average floor price (per barrel)	$	21.13	$	21.02	$	20.88	$	20.57	$	20.96
Fair value (in millions)	$	2	$	1	$	1	$	1	$	5

	Quarter Ended								Annual
2006	March 31,		June 30,		September 30,		December 31,		Annual
WTI Swaps
Barrels hedged (in thousands)		675		—		—		—		675
Equivalent gallons hedged (in millions)		28.35		—		—		—		28.35
Average swap price (per barrel)	$	23.79	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	23.79
Fair value (in millions)	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—

WTI Collars
Barrels hedged (in thousands)		150		—		—		—		150
Equivalent gallons hedged (in millions)		6.30		—		—		—		6.30
Average cap price (per barrel)	$	26.20	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	26.20
Average floor price (per barrel)	$	21.60	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	21.60
Fair value (in millions)	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—

	June 30, 2003		December 31, 2002
Fuel hedging asset	$	55	$	31
Tax effect		21		12

Amount included in AOCI, net of tax	$	34	$	19


Settled fuel hedging contracts receivable	$	6	$	29

	June 30, 2003		December 31, 2002
Interest hedging liability	$	—	$	(3	)
Tax effect		—		(1	)

Interest hedging liability included in AOCI, net of tax	$	—	$	(2	)

	BNSF Ownership Percentage		Guarantees
	BNSF Ownership Percentage		Principal Amount Guaranteed		Maximum Future Payments		Maximum Recourse Amount (a)		Remaining Term (in years)
Counterparty

Kinder Morgan Energy Partners LP	0.5	%	$	190	$	190	$	—	Termination of Ownership
Kansas City Terminal Intermodal Transportation Corporation	0.0	%	$	70	$	116	$	116	15
The Unified Government of Wyandotte County/Kansas City, Kansas	0.0	%	$	14	$	24	$	—	20
Westside Intermodal Transportation Corporation	0.0	%	$	45	$	77	$	—	20
San Jacinto Partnership	49.0	%	$	50	$	51	$	—	1
All other	0.0	%	$	13	$	16	$	7	Various

Six Months Ended June 30,	2003			2002
Beginning balance at January 1,	$	210		$	274
Payments		(18	)		(31	)
Other		(1	)		(5	)

Ending balance at June 30,	$	191		$	238

	Revenues				Cars / Units		Average Revenue Per Car / Unit
	2003		2002		2003	2002	2003		2002
	(in millions)				(in thousands)
Consumer Products	$	911	$	848	1,085	986	$	840	$	860
Industrial Products		531		535	354	373		1,500		1,434
Coal		504		488	504	500		1,000		976
Agricultural Products		317		312	186	177		1,704		1,763

Total Freight Revenues		2,263		2,183	2,129	2,036	$	1,063	$	1,072

Other Revenues		31		24

Total Operating Revenues	$	2,294	$	2,207

	June 30, 2003
	Maturity Date														Total			Fair Value
	2003	2004			2005			2006	2007			There- after			Total			Fair Value
Fair Value Hedges
Fixed to variable swaps (in millions)	—	$	100		$	300		—	$	300		$	200		$	900		$	93
Average fixed rate	—		8.63	%		6.38	%	—		7.88	%		6.13	%		7.07	%
Average floating rate	—		5.59	%		2.58	%	—		3.89	%		1.59	%		3.13	%


10.1		Burlington Northern Santa Fe Non-Employee Directors’ Stock Plan as amended and restated July 17, 2003

10.2		Termination Agreement dated May 22, 2003 between BNSF and Charles L. Schultz

10.3		Retirement Benefit Agreement dated May 22, 2003 between BNSF and Charles L. Schultz

10.4		Burlington Northern Santa Fe Achievement Award Program as amended and restated April 17, 2003

12.1		Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges

15.1		Independent Accountants’ Awareness Letter

31.1		Principal Executive Officer’s Certifications Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

31.2		Principal Financial Officer’s Certifications Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

32.1		Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 (Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)