TUT SYSTEMS INC - 10-Q Quarterly Report

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

As of July 28, 2003, 19,991,689 shares of the Registrant’s common stock, par value $0.001 per share, were issued and outstanding.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

Tut Systems, Inc. (the “Company”) was founded in 1983 and began operations in August 1991. The Company designs, develops, markets and sells video content processing systems optimized for the provisioning of public broadcast digital TV services across telephone company and cable company facilities, digital video trunking systems for applications across TV broadcast, government and education facilities, and broadband transmission systems for application over existing private campus or building facilities. Historically, most of the Company’s sales were derived from its broadband data transmission systems. With the Company’s November 2002 acquisition of VideoTele.com (“VTC”), formerly a subsidiary of Tektronix, Inc., the Company extended its product offerings to include video content processing and video trunking systems.

The Company has incurred substantial losses and negative cash flows from operations since inception. For the six months ended June 30, 2003, the Company incurred a net loss of $4,256, and negative cash flows from operating activities of $9,512, and has an accumulated deficit of $280,792 at June 30, 2003. To the extent the Company’s business continues to be affected by poor economic conditions impacting the telecommunications industry, the Company will continue to require cash to fund operations. The Company will seek additional funding for operations from alternative debt and equity sources if necessary to maintain reasonable operating levels. The Company cannot be assured that such funding efforts will be successful. Failure to generate positive cash flow in the future could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s ability to achieve its intended business objectives.

The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements as of June 30, 2003 and December 31, 2002 and for the three and six months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002 are unaudited. The unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared on the same basis as the annual financial statements and, in the opinion of management, reflect all adjustments, which include only normal recurring adjustments, necessary to present fairly the Company’s financial position as of June 30, 2003 and December 31, 2002, its results of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002 and its cash flows for the six months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002. These condensed consolidated financial statements and the accompanying notes are unaudited and should be read in conjunction with the Company’s audited financial statements included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 31, 2003. The balance sheet as of December 31, 2002, was derived from audited financial statements but does not include all disclosures required by generally accepted accounting principles. The results for the three and six months ended June 30, 2003, are not necessarily indicative of the expected results for any other interim period or the year ending December 31, 2003.

The Company generates revenue primarily from the sale of hardware products, including third-party products, through professional services, the licensing of its HomeRun technology and the sale of its software products. The Company sells products through direct sales channels and through distributors.

The Company recognizes product revenue when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, delivery has occurred or services have been provided, the fee is fixed or determinable, and collection is probable. Significant management judgments and estimates must be made in connection with the measurement of revenue in a given period. The Company follows specific and detailed guidelines for determining the timing of revenue recognition. At the time of the transaction, the Company assesses a number of factors, including specific contract and purchase order terms, completion and timing of delivery to the common carrier, past transaction history with the customer, the creditworthiness of the customer, evidence of sell-through to the end user, and current payment terms. Based on the results of the assessment, the Company may recognize revenue when the products are shipped or defer recognition until evidence of sell-through occurs and cash is received. Revenue from service obligations included in product revenues is deferred and recognized ratably over the period of the obligation. The Company also maintains accruals and allowances for all cooperative marketing and other programs. Estimated sales returns and warranty costs are based on historical experience and are recorded at the time revenue is recognized. The Company’s products generally carry a one-year warranty from the date of purchase. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2003, the Company made no adjustments to its warranty accrual. The warranty accrual was not material at June 30, 2003.

Revenue on turnkey video solution sales, which typically include the design, manufacture, test, integration and installation of the Company’s equipment to its customers’ specifications, or equipment acquired from third parties to be integrated with the Company’s products, is generally recognized using the percentage-of-completion method. Under the percentage-of-completion method, revenue recognized reflects the portion of the anticipated contract revenue that has been earned, equal to the ratio of labor costs expended to date to anticipated total labor costs, based on current estimates of labor costs to complete the project. If the estimated costs to complete a project exceed the total contract amount, indicating a loss, the entire anticipated loss is recognized immediately. Generally, the terms of turnkey video solution sales provide for billing for products at the time of delivery and for services at the time of substantial completion of the project.

The Company has entered into non-exclusive technology agreements with various licensees. These agreements provide the licensees the right to manufacture, or have manufactured, products which incorporate the Company’s proprietary technology and to receive customer support for specified periods and any changes or improvements to the technology over the term of the agreement.

Contract fees for the services provided under these licensing agreements are generally comprised of license fees and non-refundable prepaid royalties that are recognized when the proprietary technology is delivered if there are no significant vendor obligations. If the licensing agreements contain post-contract customer support, the Company recognizes the contract fees ratably over the period during which the post-contract customer support is expected to be provided. This period represents the estimated life of the technology. The Company begins to recognize revenue under the contract once it has delivered the implementation package that contains all information needed to use the Company’s proprietary technology in the licensee’s process. The remaining obligations are primarily to provide the licensee with any changes or improvements to the technology and technical advice on specifications, testing, debugging and enhancements.

The Company recognizes royalties upon notification of sale by its licensees. The terms of the royalty agreements generally require licensees to notify the Company and pay royalties within 60 days of the end of the quarter during which the sales occur.

Currently, the Company’s software revenue is derived from two separate sources, software license fees and post-contract maintenance and support fees. A software license typically grants a perpetual license to the customer. The Company generally recognizes revenue from the sale of the software license when all criteria for revenue recognition that are similarly applicable to the Company’s hardware product sales have been met. The revenue for post-contract maintenance and support fees is recognized ratably over the term of the separate support contract.

Revenue recognition in each period is dependent on the application of these accounting policies. If the Company believes that any of the conditions to recognize revenue have not been met, it will defer revenue recognition. For example, if collectiblitiy is not reasonably assured, the Company will defer revenue recognition until subsequent cash receipt. The Company’s application of percentage-of-completion accounting is subject to its estimates of labor cost to complete each turnkey solution project. In the event that actual results differ from these estimates or the Company adjusts these estimates in future periods, its operating results for a particular period could be adversely affected. Unearned revenue that has been billed but not collected at the end of the period is deferred as a reduction against the related accounts receivable balance. Unearned revenue deferred as a reduction against the related accounts receivable was $1,563 and $900 at June 30, 2003 and December 31, 2002, respectively.

Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market. Cost is computed using standard cost, which approximates actual cost on a first-in, first-out basis. The Company records provisions to write down its inventory and related purchase commitments for estimated obsolescence or unmarketable inventory equal to the difference between the cost of the inventory and the estimated market value based upon assumptions about the future demand and market conditions. If actual future demand or market conditions are less favorable than estimated, additional inventory provisions may be required.

The Company maintains an allowance for doubtful accounts for estimated losses resulting from the inability of its customers to make payments. These estimated allowances are periodically reviewed and take into account customers’ payment history and information regarding customers’ creditworthiness that is known to the Company. If the financial condition of any of its customers were to deteriorate, resulting in their inability to make payments, an additional allowance would be required.

The Company assesses the impairment of long-lived assets and related goodwill periodically. An impairment review is performed whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable. Factors considered important which could trigger an impairment review include, but are not limited to, significant underperformance relative to expected historical or projected future operating results, significant changes in the manner of use of the acquired assets or the strategy for the overall business, significant negative industry or economic trends, a significant decline in the stock price for a sustained period, and the market capitalization of the Company relative to its net book value.

When the Company determines that the carrying value may not be recoverable based upon the existence of one or more of the above indicators of impairment, any impairment is based on a projected discounted cash flow method using a discount rate commensurate with the risk inherent in the Company’s current business model.

During the three months ended June 30, 2003, the Company determined that certain of the technology acquired as part of the purchase of the ViaGate Technologies, Inc. assets in September 2001 had become impaired. As a result, the Company recorded a loss of $128 to write-off the technology.

Future events could cause the Company to conclude that impairment indicators exist. Any resulting impairment loss could have a material adverse impact on the Company’s financial condition and results of operations.

The Company is currently involved in certain legal proceedings as discussed in Note 6. Because of uncertainties related to both the potential amount and range of loss from the pending litigation, management is unable to make a reasonable estimate of the liability that could result if there were an unfavorable outcome in any of these legal proceedings. As additional information becomes available, the Company will re-assess the potential liability related to this pending litigation and revise its estimates accordingly. Revisions of the Company’s estimates of such potential liability could materially impact its results of operations, financial condition or cashflows.

The Company accounts for stock-based employee compensation arrangements in accordance with the provisions of Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25 (“APB No. 25”), “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees,” Financial Accounting Standard Board Interpretation No. 44 (“FIN 44”), “Accounting for Certain Transactions Involving Stock Compensation—an Interpretation of APB 25,” and complies with the disclosure provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 148 (“SFAS No. 148”), “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, Transition and Disclosure.” Under APB No. 25, compensation expense is based on the difference, if any, on the date of the grant, between the fair value of the Company’s stock and the exercise price. The Company accounts for stock issued to non-employees in accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 148 and the Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) Issue No. 96-18, “Accounting for Equity Instruments that are Issued to other than Employees for Acquiring, or in Conjunction with Selling Goods or Services.”

The Company amortizes stock-based compensation using the straight-line method over the remaining vesting periods of the related options, which is generally four years. Pro forma information regarding net loss and earnings per share is presented and has been determined as if the Company had accounted for employee stock options under the fair value method of SFAS No. 123, as amended by SFAS No. 148.

The following table illustrates the effect on net loss and earnings per share if the Company had applied the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS No. 123, as amended by SFAS No. 148, to stock-based employee compensation:

The fair value of options and shares issued pursuant to the option plans and at the grant date were estimated using the Black-Scholes model. The Black-Scholes option-pricing model was developed for use in estimating the fair value of traded options that have no vesting restrictions and are fully transferable. Option-pricing models require the input of highly subjective assumptions including the expected stock price volatility. The Company uses projected volatility rates, which are based upon historical volatility rates trended into future years. Because employee stock options have characteristics significantly different from those of traded options, and because changes in the subjective input assumptions can materially affect the fair value estimate, in management’s opinion, the existing models do not necessarily provide a reliable single measure of the fair value of options.

The effects of applying pro forma disclosures of net loss and net loss per share are not likely to be representative of the pro forma effects on net loss/income and earnings per share in the future years, as the number of future shares to be issued under these plans is not known and the assumptions used to determine the fair value can vary significantly.

Prior to the Company’s initial public offering, the fair value of each stock option was estimated using the minimum value method. Volatility and dividend yields were not factors in the Company’s minimum value calculation. Subsequent to the offering, the fair value of each stock option has been estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The Company has also estimated the fair value of the purchase rights issued from its employee stock purchase plan using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The Company first issued purchase rights from the 1998 Employee Stock Purchase Plan in fiscal 1999.

In April 2003, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued SFAS 149, “Amendment of Statement 133 on Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities.” SFAS 149 amends and clarifies financial accounting and reporting for derivative instruments, including certain derivative instruments embedded in other contracts (collectively referred to as derivatives) and for hedging activities under FASB Statement No. 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities.” This Statement is effective for contracts entered into or modified after June 30, 2003, for hedging relationships designated after June 30, 2003. The Company believes that the adoption of this standard will not have a material impact on its financial statements.

In May 2003, the FASB issued SFAS No. 150, “Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Characteristics of both Liabilities and Equity.” SFAS No. 150 establishes standards for how an issuer classifies and measures certain financial instruments with characteristics of both liabilities and equity. It requires that an issuer classify a financial instrument that is within its scope as a liability (or an asset in some circumstances). Many of those instruments were previously classified as equity. This Statement is effective for financial instruments entered into or modified after May 31, 2003, and otherwise is effective at the beginning of the first interim period beginning after June 15, 2003. It is to be implemented by reporting the cumulative effect of a change in an accounting principle for financial instruments created before the issuance date of the Statement and still existing at the beginning of the interim period of adoption. Restatement is not permitted. The Company believes that the adoption of this standard will not have a material impact on its financial statements.

Certain reclassifications have been made to prior period balances in order to conform to the current period presentation.

Basic and diluted net loss per share is computed using the weighted average number of common shares outstanding. Options were not included in the computation of diluted net loss per share because the effect would be antidilutive.

Comprehensive loss includes net loss, unrealized gains and losses on other assets, and foreign currency translation adjustments that have been previously excluded from net loss and reflected instead in stockholders’ equity. The following table sets forth the calculation of comprehensive loss:

The aggregate amortization expense for the three and six months ended June 30, 2003 was $459 and $918, respectively. The aggregate amortization expense for the three and six months ended June 30, 2002 was $299 and $599, respectively.

The Company leases office, assembly and warehouse space under noncancelable operating leases that expire in 2003 and 2005. In connection with the acquisition of VideoTele.com (“VTC”) in November 2002, the Company assumed an operating lease that expires in July 2005.

In August 2002, the Company entered into an agreement to terminate its lease for engineering facilities in Bridgewater Township, New Jersey for $257, which consisted of forfeiture of a $116 letter of credit and a cash payment of $141. As part of its November 2002 restructuring program, the Company entered into an agreement to terminate its lease for its headquarters facility in Pleasanton, California for $2,409, which consisted of forfeiture of a $1,350 letter of credit and a cash payment of $1,059. The Company also incurred $327 in legal costs and other professional fees related to this lease termination. These amounts were paid as of March 31, 2003. In December 2002, the Company entered into a lease agreement for a facility in Pleasanton, California that expires in December 2003.

Minimum future lease payments under operating leases at June 30, 2003 are as follows:

The Company had noncancellable commitments to purchase finished goods inventory totaling $333 and $421 in aggregate at June 30, 2003 and December 31, 2002, respectively.

Beginning July 12, 2001, six putative stockholder class action lawsuits were filed in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California against the Company and certain of its current and former officers and directors. The complaints were filed on behalf of a purported class of people who purchased the Company’s stock during the period between July 20, 2000 and January 31, 2001, seeking unspecified damages. The complaints allege that the Company and certain of its current and former officers and directors made false and misleading statements about the Company’s business during the putative class period. Specifically, the complaints allege violations of Section 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. The complaints have been consolidated under the name In re Tut Systems, Inc. Securities Litigation, Master File No. C-01-2659-CW (the “Securities Litigation Action”). Lead plaintiffs and lead counsel for plaintiffs have been appointed. Plaintiffs filed a consolidated class action complaint on February 4, 2002. Defendants filed a Motion to Dismiss on March 29, 2002. On August 15, 2002, the Court granted in part and denied in part the Motion to Dismiss. On September 23, 2002, plaintiffs filed an amended complaint. Defendants filed a motion to dismiss portions of the amended complaint. The Court has not ruled on that motion. The Company believes it has meritorious defenses to the allegations in the complaint and intends to defend the case vigorously. An unfavorable resolution of this litigation could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.

On March 19, 2003, Chesky Lefkowitz, a shareholder of the Company, filed a derivative complaint entitled Lefkowitz v. D’Auria, et al., No. RG03087467, in the Superior Court of the State of California, County of Alameda, against certain of the Company’s current and former officers and directors. The complaint alleges causes of action for breach of fiduciary duty, gross negligence, breach of contract, unjust enrichment and improper insider stock trading, based on the same factual allegations contained in the Securities Litigation Action. The complaint seeks unspecified damages against the individual defendants on behalf of the Company, equitable relief, and attorneys’ fees. On May 21, 2003, the Company and the individual defendants filed separate demurrers to the complaint. The demurrers have not yet been heard by the Court, and no trial date has been established.

On October 30, 2001, the Company and certain of its current and former officers and directors were named as defendants in Whalen v. Tut Systems, Inc. et al., Case No. 01-CV-9563, a purported securities class action lawsuit filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. An amended complaint was filed on December 5, 2001. A consolidated amended complaint was filed on April 19, 2002. The consolidated amended complaint asserts that the prospectuses from the Company’s January 29, 1999 initial public offering and its March 23, 2000 secondary offering failed to disclose certain alleged actions by the underwriters for the offerings. The complaint alleges claims against the Company and certain of its current and former officers and directors under Section 11 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, (the “1933 Act”) and under Section 10(b) and Rule 10b-5 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and alleges claims against certain of its current and former officers and directors under Sections 15 and 20(a) of the 1933 Act. The complaints also name as defendants the underwriters for the Company’s initial public offering and secondary offering. The Court has denied the Company’s motion to dismiss. A proposal has been made for the settlement and release of claims against the issuer defendants, including the Company. The settlement is subject to a number of conditions, including approval of the proposed settling parties and the Court. If the settlement does not occur, and the litigation against the Company continues, the Company believes it has meritorious defenses to the allegations in the complaint and intends to defend the case vigorously. An unfavorable resolution of this litigation could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.

The Company is subject to other legal proceedings, claims and litigation arising in the ordinary course of business. The Company’s management does not expect that the ultimate costs to resolve these matters will have a material adverse effect on the Company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.

The Company currently targets its sales and marketing efforts to both public and private service providers and users across two related markets. The Company currently operates in a single business segment as there is only one measurement of profitability for its operations. Revenues are attributed to the following countries based on the location of customers:

It is impracticable for the Company to compute product revenues by product type for the three and six months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002.

No individual customer accounted for greater than 10% of the Company’s revenue for the three and six months ended June 30, 2003. Two customers, COM21 and Ingram Micro accounted for 19% and 21%, respectively, of the Company’s revenue for the three months ended June 30, 2002. No customer accounted for greater than 10% of the Company’s revenue for the six months ended June 30, 2002.

In accordance with SFAS 141, the following unaudited pro forma information is provided. The total revenues include the consolidated revenues of the Company as reported and the net revenues of VTC as if it had been acquired as of January 1, 2002. The pro forma net loss and net loss per share have been adjusted to include the additional costs of amortization of intangibles and depreciation based on the actual purchase price of VTC. The unaudited pro forma information is not necessarily indicative of what actual results would have been had the acquisition been completed by the Company at the beginning of the period.

The section entitled “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” set forth below contains “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. These forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, statements about (1) our expectation that our U.S. sales will continue to represent most of our aggregate sales for the remainder of 2003 and that international sales will continue to represent a significant portion of our revenue, (2) our expectation that our foreign sales will continue to be denominated primarily in U.S. dollars, (3) our expectation that we will continue to make significant expenditures on research and development activities as a percentage of overall operating expenses, (4) our expectation that our research and development activities will represent a significant percentage of our overall operating expenses during the remainder of 2003, (5) our expectation that the amount of cash used to fund operations will decrease throughout the remainder of 2003, (6) our anticipation that our working capital expenditures on a period-to-period basis will decrease, (7) our expectation that our cash and cash equivalents will be sufficient to satisfy our cash requirements for the next 12 months, (8) our expectation that we will continue to evaluate product line expansion and new product opportunities, engage in research, development and engineering activities and focus on cost-effective design of our products, (9) our expectation that we will seek additional funding for operations from alternative debt and equity sources, if necessary, to maintain reasonable operation levels, (10) our expectation that we will continue to incur losses for the remainder of fiscal year 2003, (11) our anticipation that the average selling prices for our products will continue to decrease in the near future due to increased competitive price pressures in certain geographical regions, (12) our expectation that we will make acquisitions of, or significant investments in, other companies, (13) our expectation that competitors will continue to market and sell inexpensive competitive products in the marketplace, (14) our anticipation that, in the future, expansion in certain areas of our business may be required to expand our customer base and exploit market opportunities, (15) our expectation that demand for our products that are based on copper telephone lines will decline, and (16) our revenue sources, our cash flow and cash position, our expense trends, products and standards development, and our plans, objectives, expectations and intentions and other statements contained herein that are not historical facts. When used herein, the words “anticipates,” “believes,” “continue,” “could,” “estimates,” “expects,” “intends,” “may,” “plans,” “seeks,” “should,” “will” or the negative of these terms or similar expressions are generally intended to identify forward-looking statements. Because these forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties, there are important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date hereof. These forward-looking statements reflect current views of our management with respect to future events and are subject to these and other risks, uncertainties and assumptions. As a result, actual results may differ materially from the forward-looking statements contained herein. All subsequent written and oral forward-looking statements attributable to us or persons acting on our behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety by this paragraph.

We design, develop and sell video content processing systems optimized for the provisioning of public broadcast digital TV services across telephone company and cable company facilities, digital video trunking systems for applications across TV broadcast, government and education facilities, and broadband data transmission systems for application over existing private campus or building facilities.

Historically, most of our sales were derived from our broadband data transmission systems. With our November 2002 acquisition of Video Tele.com (“VTC”), formerly a subsidiary of Tektronix, Inc. (“Tektronix”), we extended our product offerings to include video content processing and video trunking systems. The acquisition of VTC has resulted in a significant change in the structure, organization and priorities of the Company, including: (1) changes in our organizational structure and employee staffing; (2) establishment of significant operations in Lake Oswego, Oregon, the prior headquarters location of VTC; (3) an expansion of our sales and marketing efforts to include VTC products; and (4) a reprioritization of our research and development budget to include the research and development of products acquired by us in our acquisition of VTC.

Sales to customers outside of the United States accounted for approximately 18.2% and 52.2% of revenue for the six months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002, respectively. With the inclusion of the products associated with the acquisition of VTC, the geographic distribution of our sales has shifted significantly towards the United States. We expect this trend to continue for the remainder of 2003. However, actual results, both geographically and in absolute dollars, may vary from quarter to quarter depending on the timing of orders placed by our customers. To date, all international sales have been primarily denominated in U.S. dollars.

We expect to continue to evaluate product line expansion and new product opportunities, engage in research, development and engineering activities and focus on cost-effective design of our products. Accordingly, we will continue to make significant expenditures on research and development activities as a percentage of overall operating expenses.

In February 2000, we acquired FreeGate Corporation (“FreeGate”) for approximately $25.5 million, consisting of 510,931 shares of our common stock, 19,707 options to acquire shares of our common stock, and acquisition related expenses consisting primarily of investment advisory, legal and other professional service fees and other assumed liabilities. This transaction was treated as a purchase for accounting purposes. FreeGate was located in Sunnyvale, California. FreeGate designed, developed and marketed Internet server appliances combining the functions of IP routing, firewall security, network address translation, secure remote access via VPN networking, and email and web servers on a compact, PC-based platform.

In April 2000, we acquired certain assets of OneWorld Systems, Inc. (“OneWorld”) for approximately $2.4 million in cash. This transaction was treated as a purchase for accounting purposes. The acquired assets consisted of $1.0 million for acquired workforce, $1.1 million for goodwill and $0.3 million for property and equipment.

In May 2000, we acquired Xstreamis Limited (“Xstreamis”), formerly Xstreamis, PLC, for $19.6 million, consisting of 439,137 shares of our common stock, 10,863 options to acquire shares of our common stock, $0.1 million in cash and $0.6 million in acquisition related expenses consisting primarily of legal and other professional fees. This transaction was treated as a purchase for accounting purposes. Xstreamis was located in the United Kingdom. Xstreamis provided policy-driven traffic management for high-performance, multimedia networking solutions including routing, switching and bridging functions.

In January 2001, we acquired ActiveTelco, Inc. (“ActiveTelco”) for approximately $4.9 million, consisting of 321,343 shares of our common stock, 18,657 options to acquire shares of our common stock, acquisition related expenses consisting primarily of legal and other professional fees, assumed ActiveTelco convertible notes in the amount of $0.7 million plus accrued interest and other assumed liabilities of approximately $1.1 million. This transaction was treated as a purchase for accounting purposes. ActiveTelco was located in Fremont, California. ActiveTelco provided an Internet telephony platform that enabled Internet and telecommunications service providers to integrate and deliver Web-based telephony applications such as unified messaging, long-distance service, voicemail and fax delivery, call forwarding, call conferencing and callback services.

In September 2001, we acquired certain assets, including some intellectual property rights, from ViaGate Technologies, Inc. (“ViaGate”) for approximately $0.6 million in cash. This transaction was treated as a purchase of assets for accounting purposes. The acquired patents and technology of ViaGate provide a highly scalable, carrier-class, full service gateway built on standards-based asynchronous transfer mode, or ATM, IP and VDSL technology.

In November 2002, we acquired VTC from Tektronix for approximately $7.2 million, consisting of 3.3 million shares of our common stock valued at $3.6 million, acquisition related expenses consisting primarily of legal and other professional fees of $0.3 million, and a note payable to Tektronix in the amount of $3.3 million. This transaction was treated as a purchase for accounting purposes. VTC was located in Lake Oswego, Oregon. VTC offers digital head-end solutions enabling home entertainment delivery via the broadband Internet.

In connection with our acquisition of VTC, we registered on a Form S-3 pursuant to Rule 415(a)(1)(i) under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, on a continuous or delayed, offering the 3.3 million shares of common stock issued to Tektronix, in order that Tektronix may sell such shares on or after December 1, 2003.

As of June 30, 2003, our net intangible assets remaining to be amortized were $4.4 million, related to the acquisitions of the ViaGate assets, Xstreamis and VTC.

The following table sets forth items from our statements of operations as a percentage of total revenues for the periods indicated:

Revenue. We generate revenue primarily from the sale of hardware products, which includes both our products and third-party products, professional services through the licensing of our HomeRun technology, and from the sale of software products. Following our acquisition of VTC in November 2002, we also generate revenues from turnkey video solutions, which are comprised of digital head-end and video trunking equipment. Our total product revenue increased to $7.7 million and $14.1 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2003, respectively, when compared to the same periods for 2002. The increase of $5.4 million or 213% and $9.6 million or 197% for the three and six months ended June 30, 2003, respectively, compared with the prior year is due to the additional revenue resulting from our sales of products acquired in our acquisition of VTC. The increase in product revenue attributable to products acquired with the VTC acquisition offset a decline in sales of our other products compared with the prior year reporting periods.

License and royalty revenue was $0.2 million and $0.4 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2003, respectively, compared to $0.2 million and $0.4 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2002, respectively. We did not enter into any new license or royalty agreements during the first six months of 2003 or 2002.

Cost of Goods Sold/Gross Margin. Cost of goods sold consists of costs related to raw materials, contract manufacturing, personnel costs, overhead, test and quality assurance products, and the cost of licensed technology included in our products. Excluding the reserves for excess and obsolete inventory included in cost of sales of $0.3 million and $4.9 million taken in the first and second quarters of 2002, respectively, our cost of goods sold increased to $4.0 million and $7.3 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2003, respectively, compared to $1.7 million and $2.9 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2002, respectively. The increase was primarily due to increased product sales and consequently, increased product costs related to the additional product sales resulting from our VTC acquisition. As a percentage of revenue, however, the VTC products have a lower cost of sales than our other products. We did not record any additions to the excess and obsolete inventory reserves in the first two quarters of 2003.

Gross margin as a percentage of revenue increased to 48.9% and 49.7% of revenue for the three and six months ended June 30, 2003, respectively, from 33.7% and 40.7% for the three and six months ended June 30, 2002, respectively, excluding the reserves for excess and obsolete inventory included in cost of goods sold. The increase in our aggregate gross margin is the result of the higher gross margins associated with the VTC product line and the benefit that the inclusion of these VTC sales volumes has had on our gross margins whereas these VTC products were not included in our 2002 financials.

Sales and Marketing. Sales and marketing expense primarily consists of personnel costs, including commissions and costs related to customer support facilities, travel, trade shows, promotions and outside services. Our sales and marketing expenses decreased to $1.9 million and $3.9 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2003, respectively, from $2.5 million and $4.8 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2002, respectively. The decrease for the three and six months ended June 30, 2003 when compared to the same periods in 2002 of $0.6 million, or 21.9%, and $0.9 million, or 19.4%, respectively, were primarily due to our restructuring efforts, which has allowed us to support increasing revenue with a lower cost structure.

Research and Development. Research and development expense primarily consists of personnel and facilities costs related to engineering and technical support, contract consultants, outside testing services, equipment and supplies associated with enhancing existing products and developing new products. Research and development costs are expensed as incurred. Our research and development expense decreased to $2.2 million and $4.3 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2003, respectively, from $3.5 million and $6.8 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2002, respectively. The decrease for the three and six months ended June 30, 2003, when compared with the same periods in 2002 of $1.3 million, or 35.8% and $2.5 million, or 36.1%, respectively, were primarily a result of our continued focus on cost saving measures and prior year restructurings, including the reduction, postponement or abandonment of research and development efforts on certain product lines. These cost savings resulted in year-over-year decreases of $1.2 million in personnel costs and $1.3 million in travel and other expenses. Even though our total research and development costs decreased in total for the first six months of 2003 compared with the first six months of 2002, we expect research and development activities to represent a significant percentage of our overall operating expenses during the remainder of 2003.

General and Administrative. General and administrative expense primarily consists of personnel costs for administrative officers and support personnel, legal, accounting, insurance and consulting fees. Our general and administrative expense decreased to $1.1 million and $2.3 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2003, respectively, from $1.2 million and $3.2 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2002, respectively. The decrease for the three and six months ended June 30, 2003 when compared with the same periods in 2002 of $0.1 million or 11.2% and $0.9 million or 28.0%, respectively, were primarily due to our continued focus on cost saving measures and our restructurings in 2002, which resulted in year-over-year decreases of $0.6 million in insurance and professional fees and $0.3 million in depreciation expense.

Impairment of Intangibles. The Company recognized a loss of $128,000 during the three and six months ended June 30, 2003 for the impairment of certain technology acquired as part of the acquisition of the assets of ViaGate. There were no such write-offs during the three and six months ended June 30, 2002.

Amortization of Intangibles. Amortization of intangibles is comprised of technology and patents related to acquisitions and is amortized over their estimated useful lives of five years. Amortization of intangibles increased to $0.5 million and $0.9 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2003, respectively, from $0.3 million and $0.6 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2002, respectively. The increase was primarily due to the intangibles acquired when we purchased VTC in November 2002. As of June 30, 2003, net intangible assets of $4.4 million, which consist primarily of completed technology and patents, which remain to be amortized.

Impairment of Certain Equity Investments. Impairment of certain equity investments for the three and six months ended June 30, 2002 consisted of the recognition of expense related to the write-off of $0.6 million invested in a privately-held company. The value of this investment was impaired due to uncertainty about the continued viability of the company. As of June 30, 2002, we had no remaining investments in privately held companies.

Interest and Other (Expense) Income, Net. Interest and other income, net consists primarily of interest income and expense and a foreign currency exchange gain. Our net interest income and other income became an expense for the three months ended June 30, 2003, as a result of interest expense on a note payable exceeding interest income. Interest income and other income net decreased to $0.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2003. This compares with income of $0.2 million and $0.4 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2002, respectively. The decreases for the three and six months ended June 30, 2003 were due to lower interest rates on lower average cash balances and to increased interest expense associated with the long-term note payable to Tektronix, Inc. related to the acquisition of VTC. These reductions in interest and other income, net were partially offset by a foreign currency exchange gain.

Historically, our principal source of liquidity has been through equity funding. From our inception through January 1999, we financed our operations primarily through the sale of preferred equity securities for an aggregate of $46.2 million, net of offering costs. In January 1999, we completed our initial public offering and issued 2,875,000 shares of our common stock at a price of $18.00 per share. From that January 1999 offering, we received approximately $46.9 million in cash, net of underwriting discounts, commissions and other offering costs. We also received approximately $6.7 million as a result of the exercise of a warrant to purchase 666,836 shares of Series G convertible preferred stock at a price of $10.00 per share. In March 2000, we completed our secondary offering and issued 2,500,000 shares of our common stock at a price of $60.00 per share, and we received approximately $141.7 million in cash, net of underwriting discounts, commissions and other offering costs. In the future, we cannot be certain that similar equity funding will be available to us. If we are unable to obtain additional equity financing on terms acceptable to us, our business, operating results and financial condition could be negatively impacted.

Cash and cash equivalents totaled $15.5 million at June 30, 2003, a decrease of $9.9 million, or 38.7%, from cash and cash equivalents of $25.6 million at December 31, 2002.

The net decrease in cash and cash equivalents of $9.9 million during the six months ended June 30, 2003 resulted primarily from our use of $9.5 million in cash for operating activities and purchase of property and equipment of $0.5 million. Included in cash used for operating activities was the payment of $3.7 million towards our remaining purchase commitments to a prior vendor for raw material components and an increase in accounts receivable of $2.9 million. Also included in cash used for operating activities during the six months ended June 30, 2003 were cash payments of $0.5 million associated with our restructuring activities that we had previously reserved for.

In future periods, we generally anticipate a decrease in working capital expenditures on a period-to-period basis primarily as a result of completing a substantial portion of payments for purchase commitments for inventory and decreases in our operational costs due to our restructuring and prior workforce reductions.

We have entered into certain contractual obligations and other purchase commitments that could result in cash outflows.

Our future minimum lease payments under operating leases at June 30, 2003 are as follows:

As part of our acquisition of VTC from Tektronix in November 2002, we issued a note payable to Tektronix for $3.2 million, with repayment in sixty months, or November 2007. The interest rate on this note is 8% and is compounded annually. Through January 31, 2006, the accrued interest is added to the principal balance of the note. Thereafter, we will pay accrued interest on this note commencing on January 31, 2006 and on each April 30, July 31 and October 31 thereafter until the principal balance is paid in full.

We have incurred substantial losses and negative cash flows from operating activities since inception. For the six months ended June 30, 2003, we incurred a net loss of $4.3 million, negative cash flows from operating activities of $9.5 million, and have an accumulated deficit of $280.8 million. Management believes that the cash and cash equivalents as of June 30, 2003 are sufficient to fund our operating activities and capital expenditure requirements for the next twelve months. Management expects the amount of cash used to fund operations to decrease throughout the remainder of 2003. However, to the extent our business continues to be affected by poor economic conditions impacting the telecommunications industry, we will continue to require cash to fund operations. We will seek additional funding for operations from alternative debt and equity sources, if necessary, to maintain reasonable operating levels. We cannot assure that such funding efforts will be successful. Failure to generate positive cash flow in the future could have a material adverse effect on our ability to achieve our intended business objectives.

The discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations is based upon our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The preparation of these financial statements requires management to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. On an on-going basis, we evaluate our estimates, including those related to revenue recognition, bad debts, investments, intangible assets and income taxes. Our estimates are based on historical experience and on various other assumptions we believe are reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results may differ from these estimates.

The accounting policies described below are those that most frequently require us to make estimates and judgments, and are therefore critical to understanding our results of operations.

We generate revenue primarily from the sale of hardware products, including third-party products, through professional services, the licensing of our HomeRun technology and the sale of our software products. We sell products through direct sales channels and through distributors.

We recognize product revenue when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, delivery has occurred or services have been provided, the fee is fixed or determinable, and collection is probable. Significant management judgments and estimates must be made in connection with the measurement of revenue in a given period. We follow specific and detailed guidelines for determining the timing of revenue recognition. At the time of the transaction, we assess a number of factors, including specific contract and purchase order terms, completion and timing of delivery to the common carrier, past transaction history with the customer, the creditworthiness of the customer, evidence of sell-through to the end user, and current payment terms. Based on the results of our assessment, we may recognize revenue when the products are shipped or defer recognition until evidence of sell-through occurs and cash is received. Revenue from service obligations included in product revenues is deferred and recognized ratably over the period of the obligation. We also maintain accruals and allowances for all cooperative marketing and other programs. Estimated sales returns and warranty costs are based on historical experience and are recorded at the time revenue is recognized. Our products generally carry a one-year warranty from the date of purchase. During the six months ended June 30, 2003 the Company made no adjustments to its warranty accrual.

Revenue on turnkey video solution sales, which typically include the design, manufacture, test, integration and installation of our equipment to our customers’ specifications, or equipment acquired from third parties to be integrated with our products, is generally recognized using the percentage-of-completion method. Under the percentage-of-completion method, revenue recognized reflects the portion of the anticipated contract revenue that has been earned, equal to the ratio of labor costs expended to date to anticipated total labor costs, based on current estimates of labor costs to complete the project. If the estimated costs to complete a project exceed the total contract amount, indicating a loss, the entire anticipated loss is recognized immediately. Generally, the terms of turnkey video solution sales provide for billing for products at the time of delivery and for services at the time of substantial completion of the project.

We have entered into non-exclusive technology agreements with various licensees. These agreements provide the licensees the right to manufacture, or have manufactured, products which incorporate the Company’s proprietary technology and to receive customer support for specified periods and any changes or improvement to the technology over the term of the agreement.

Contract fees for the services provided under these licensing agreements are generally comprised of license fees and non-refundable, prepaid royalties that are recognized when the proprietary technology is delivered if there are no significant vendor obligations. If the licensing agreements contain post-contract customer support, we recognize the contract fees ratably over the period during which the post-contract customer support is expected to be provided. This period represents the estimated life of the technology. We begin to recognize revenue under the contract once it has delivered the implementation package that contains all information needed to use our proprietary technology in the licensee’s process. The remaining obligations are primarily to provide the licensee with any changes or improvements to the technology and technical advice on specifications, testing, debugging and enhancements.

We recognize royalties upon notification of sale by our licensees. The terms of the royalty agreements generally require licensees to notify us and pay royalties within 60 days of the end of the quarter during which the sales occur.

Currently, our software revenue is derived from two separate sources, software license fees and post-contract maintenance and support fees. A software license typically grants a perpetual license to the customer. We generally recognize revenue from the sales of software licenses when all criteria for revenue recognition that are similarly applicable to our hardware product sales have been met. The revenue for post-contract maintenance and support fees is recognized ratably over the term of the separate support contract.

Revenue recognition in each period is dependant on our application of these accounting policies. If we believe that any of the conditions to recognize revenue have not been met, we will defer revenue recognition. For example, if collectiblitiy is not reasonably assured, we will defer revenue recognition until subsequent cash receipt. Our application of percentage-of-completion accounting is subject to our estimates of labor cost to complete each turnkey solution project. In the event that actual results differ from these estimates or we adjust these estimates in future periods, our operating results for a particular period could be adversely affected. Unearned revenue that has been billed but not collected at the end of the period is deferred as a reduction against the related accounts receivable balance. Unearned revenue deferred as a reduction against the related accounts receivable was $1.6 million and $0.9 million at June 30, 2003 and December 31, 2002, respectively.

Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market. Cost is computed using standard cost, which approximates actual cost on a first-in, first-out basis. We record provisions to write down our inventory and related purchase commitments for estimated obsolescence or unmarketable inventory equal to the difference between the cost of the inventory and the estimated market value based upon assumptions about the future demand and market conditions. If actual future demand or market conditions are less favorable than we estimate, additional inventory provisions may be required.

We maintain allowances for doubtful accounts for estimated losses resulting from the inability of our customers to make payments. These estimated allowances are periodically reviewed and take into account the customers’ payment history and information regarding the customers’ creditworthiness that is known to us. If the financial condition of any of our customers were to deteriorate, resulting in their inability to make payments, an additional allowance would be required.

We assess the impairment of long-lived assets and related goodwill periodically. An impairment review is performed whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable. Factors considered important which could trigger an impairment review include, but are not limited to, significant underperformance relative to expected historical or projected future operating results, significant changes in the manner of use of the acquired assets or the strategy for the overall business, significant negative industry or economic trends, a significant decline in the stock price for a sustained period, and the market capitalization relative to net book value.

When our management determines that the carrying value may not be recoverable based upon the existence of one or more of the above indicators of impairment, any impairment is based on a projected discounted cash flow method using a discount rate commensurate with the risk inherent in our current business model.

During the three months ended June 30, 2003, we determined that certain of the technology acquired as part of our purchase of the ViaGate assets in September 2001 had become impaired. As a result, we recorded a loss of $128,000 to write-off the technology.

Future events could cause us to conclude that impairment indicators exist. Any resulting impairment loss could have a material adverse impact on our financial condition and results of operations.

We are currently involved in certain legal proceedings as discussed in Note 6 of our consolidated financial statements. Because of uncertainties related to both the potential amount and range of loss from the pending litigation, management is unable to make a reasonable estimate of the liability that could result if there were an unfavorable outcome in any of these legal proceedings. As additional information becomes available, we will re-assess the potential liability related to this pending litigation and revise our estimates accordingly. Revisions of our estimates of such potential liability could materially impact our results of operations, financial condition or cashflows.

We account for stock-based employee compensation arrangements in accordance with the provisions of Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25 (“APB No. 25”), and “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees,” Financial Accounting Standard Board Interpretation No. 44 (“FIN 44”), “Accounting for Certain Transactions Involving Stock Compensation—an Interpretation of APB 25,” and complies with the disclosure provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 148 (“SFAS No. 148”), “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, Transition and Disclosure.” Under APB No. 25, compensation expense is based on the difference, if any, on the date of the grant, between the fair value of the Company’s stock and the exercise price. We account for stock issued to non-employees in accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 148 and the Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) Issue No. 96-18, “Accounting for Equity Instruments that are Issued to other than Employees for Acquiring, or in Conjunction with Selling Goods or Services.”

We amortize stock-based compensation using the straight-line method over the remaining vesting periods of the related options, which is generally four years. Pro forma information regarding net loss and earnings per share is required. This information is required to be determined as if we had accounted for employee stock options under the fair value method of SFAS No. 123, as amended by SFAS No. 148.

The following table illustrates the effect on net loss and earnings per share if we had applied the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS No. 123, as amended by SFAS No. 148, to stock-based employee compensation (unaudited, in thousands except per share amounts):

The fair value of options and shares issued pursuant to the option plans and at the grant date were estimated using the Black-Scholes model. The Black-Scholes option-pricing model was developed for use in estimating the fair value of traded options that have no vesting restrictions and are fully transferable. Option-pricing models require the input of highly subjective assumptions including the expected stock price volatility. We use projected volatility rates, which are based upon historical volatility rates trended into future years. Because employee stock options have characteristics significantly different from those of traded options, and because changes in the subjective input assumptions can materially affect the fair value estimate, in management’s opinion, the existing models do not necessarily provide a reliable single measure of the fair value of options.

The effects of applying pro forma disclosures of net loss and net loss per share are not likely to be representative of the pro forma effects on net loss and net loss per share in the future years, as the number of future shares to be issued under these plans is not known and the assumptions used to determine the fair value can vary significantly.

Prior to our initial public offering, the fair value of each stock option was estimated using the minimum value method. Volatility and dividend yields were not factors in the Company’s minimum value calculation. Subsequent to the offering, the fair value of each stock option has been estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. We have also estimated the fair value of the purchase rights issued from our employee stock purchase plan using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. We first issued purchase rights from the 1998 Employee Stock Purchase Plan in fiscal 1999.

In April 2003, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued SFAS 149, “Amendment of Statement 133 on Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities.” SFAS 149 amends and clarifies financial accounting and reporting for derivative instruments, including certain derivative instruments embedded in other contracts (collectively referred to as derivatives) and for hedging activities under FASB Statement No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities. This Statement is effective for contracts entered into or modified after June 30, 2003, and for hedging relationships designated after June 30, 2003. We believe that the adoption of this standard will not have a material impact on our financial statements.

In May 2003, the FASB issued SFAS No. 150, “Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Characteristics of both Liabilities and Equity.” SFAS No. 150 establishes standards for how an issuer classifies and measures certain financial instruments with characteristics of both liabilities and equity. It requires that an issuer classify a financial instrument that is within its scope as a liability (or an asset in some circumstances). Many of those instruments were previously classified as equity. This Statement is effective for financial instruments entered into or modified after May 31, 2003, and otherwise is effective at the beginning of the first interim period beginning after June 15, 2003. It is to be implemented by reporting the cumulative effect of a change in an accounting principle for financial instruments created before the issuance date of the Statement and still existing at the beginning of the interim period of adoption. Restatement is not permitted. We believe that the adoption of this standard will not have a material impact on our financial statements.

In accordance with Section 10(A)(i)(2) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as added by Section 202 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, we are required to disclose the non-audit services approved by our Audit Committee to be provided by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, our independent auditor. The Audit Committee has not approved the engagement of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP for any non-audit services.

ADDITIONAL RISK FACTORS THAT COULD AFFECT OUR OPERATING RESULTS AND THE MARKET PRICE OF OUR STOCK

We have a history of losses and expect to continue to incur losses in the future.

We have incurred substantial net losses and experienced negative cash flow for each quarter since our inception. We incurred a net loss of $4.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2003 and a net loss of $41.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2002. As of June 30, 2003, we had an accumulated deficit of $280.8 million. We expect that we will continue to incur losses for the remainder of fiscal year 2003.

We may never achieve profitability and, if we do so, we may not be able to maintain profitability. We have spent substantial amounts of money on the development of our Expresso products, HomeRun and LongRun technology, IntelliPOP products and software products. In November 2002, we acquired VideoTele.com (“VTC”) and certain products of VTC that are bringing us incremental revenue beyond our Expresso, Home Run, Long Run and IntelliPOP products and that we anticipate will continue to bring us such incremental value. During fiscal years 2001 and 2002, we significantly reduced our workforce in an effort to decrease certain of our operating expenditures, including our sales and marketing, research and development and general and administrative expenditures. However, we may not be able to generate a sufficient level of revenue (even with our VTC products) to offset our current level of expenditures. Additionally, we may be unable to adjust our spending in a timely manner to respond to any unanticipated decline in revenue due to the fact that our expenditures for sales and marketing, research and development, and general and administrative functions are relatively fixed in the short term. Our ability to achieve and maintain profitability in the future will primarily depend on our ability to do the following:

Our operating results may fluctuate significantly, which could cause our stock price to decline.

A number of factors could cause our quarterly and annual financial results to be worse than expected, which could result in a decline in our stock price. Our annual and quarterly operating results have fluctuated in the past and may fluctuate significantly in the future as a result of numerous factors, some of which are outside of our control. These factors include:

We anticipate that average selling prices for our products will continue to decrease in the near future due to increased competitive price pressures in certain geographical regions. In addition, we may also experience substantial period-to-period fluctuations in future operating results and declines in gross margins as a result of the erosion of average selling prices for our VTC products, high-speed data access products and services due to a number of factors, including increased competition and rapid technological change. Decreasing the average selling prices of our products could cause us to experience decreased revenue despite an increase in the number of units sold. We may be unable to sustain our gross margins, even at the anticipated reduced levels, improve our gross margins by offering new products or increased product functionality or offset future price declines with proportionate reductions in our cost structure.

As a result of these and other factors, our operating results for future periods may be below the expectations of securities analysts and investors. In that event, the price of our common stock would further decline.

We are and continue to be affected by poor general economic conditions that have resulted in significantly reduced sales levels and, if such adverse economic conditions continue or worsen, our business, operating results and financial condition will be further negatively impacted.

The continued poor economic conditions in the world economy, the continued industry-wide slowdown in the telecommunications market and events in the Middle East have materially and adversely affected, and continue to materially and adversely affect, our sales. As a result, we have experienced, and will likely continue to experience, a material adverse impact on our business, operating results and financial condition. Comparatively lower sales for each of our fiscal years from 2000 through 2002 have resulted in operating expenses increasing as a percentage of revenue for 2002 and 2001 compared to 2000. Although we took actions throughout 2001, 2002 and the first quarter of 2003 to create revenue opportunities and reduce operating expenses, including our acquisition of VTC, a prolonged continuation or worsening of sales trends that we faced in 2001 and 2002 would force us to take additional actions and charges in order to reduce our operating expenses further. If we are unable to reduce operating expenses at a rate and level consistent with anticipated future adverse sales trends or if we continue to incur significant special charges associated with such expense reductions that are disproportionate to our sales, our business, operating results and financial condition will be even further negatively impacted.

We depend on a limited number of large customers for a substantial portion of our revenue during any given period, and the loss of a key customer or loss or delay of a key order could substantially reduce our revenue in a given period.

We derive a significant portion of our revenue in each period from a limited number of customers. However, no individual customer accounted for more than 10% of our revenue for the six months ended June 30, 2003, and June 30, 2002. Many of our customers have limited or, in some cases, no access to capital and continue to experience significant financial difficulties, including bankruptcy. In order to meet our revenue targets, we must continue to acquire new customers and increase sales to our existing customers. In addition, our strategy of targeting larger, more established customers may result in longer sales cycles and delayed revenue. Sales to larger accounts could also result in increased competition from larger and more established competitors. If sales to our largest customers decrease materially below current levels or if we are unable to establish a new base of customers, such decreases or failures would materially and adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.

We have in the past and may in the future acquire other companies. If we fail to integrate successfully these acquisitions into our Company, our business, results of operations and financial condition could be materially harmed.

In fiscal years 2002, 2001 and 2000, we completed four acquisitions of other companies. As a part of our business strategy, we expect to make additional acquisitions of, or significant investments in, complementary companies, products or technologies. We may need to overcome significant issues in order to realize any benefits from our past transactions, and any future acquisitions would be accompanied by similar risks. These risks include, but are not limited to:

On November 7, 2002, we completed our acquisition of VTC, a leading provider of video content processing and video trunking, and we are in the process of integrating VTC into our company. We evaluate and enter into other acquisition and alliance transactions on an ongoing basis. The size and scope of the acquisition of VTC relative to our overall size increases both the scope and consequence of ongoing integration risks. We may not successfully address the integration challenges in a timely manner, or at all, and we may not fully realize all of the anticipated benefits or synergies of the VTC acquisition (which principally entail restructuring our organization through workforce reductions, identification of procurement synergies and other such operational efficiencies) or any other acquisition to the extent, or in the timeframe, anticipated. Moreover, the timeframe for achieving benefits of any such acquisition may depend partially on the actions of employees, suppliers or other third parties.

As a result of the foregoing, if we are unable to integrate successfully any completed, pending or future acquisitions, our business, operating results and financial condition could be materially harmed.

We are currently engaged in three securities lawsuits, two of which are class action lawsuits, any of which, if they were to result in an unfavorable resolution, could adversely affect our business, results of operations or financial condition.

On October 30, 2001, Tut Systems and certain of its current and former officers and directors were named as defendants in Whalen v. Tut Systems, Inc. et al., Case No. 01-CV-9563, a purported securities class action lawsuit filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. An amended complaint was filed on December 5, 2001. A consolidated amended complaint was filed on April 19, 2002. The consolidated amended complaint asserts that the prospectuses from Tut Systems’ January 29, 1999 initial public offering and its March 23, 2000 secondary offering failed to disclose certain alleged actions by the underwriters for the offerings. The complaint alleges claims against Tut Systems and certain of its current and former officers and directors under Section 11 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, (the “1933 Act”) and under Section 10(b) and Rule 10b-5 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and alleges claims against certain of its current and former officers and directors under Sections 15 and 20(a) of the 1933 Act. The complaints also name as defendants the underwriters for Tut Systems’ initial public offering and secondary offering. The Court has denied the Company’s motion to dismiss. A proposal has been made for the settlement and release of claims against the issuer defendants, including the Company. The settlement is subject to a number of conditions, including approval of the proposed settling parties, and the Court. If the settlement does not occur, and the litigation against the Company continues, the Company believes it has meritorious defenses to the allegations in the complaint and intends to defend the case vigorously. An unfavorable resolution of this litigation could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.

If we do not reduce our inventory, we may be forced to incur additional charges, which would further materially and adversely impact our business, results of operations and financial condition.

In fiscal years 2000 and 2001, we accumulated a substantial inventory of finished goods and components due to poor global economic conditions and the reduction in product demand due to capital funding decreases experienced by several key customers. Since that time, we have written off a significant portion of that inventory because we have been largely unsuccessful in monetizing this inventory by selling our existing finished goods inventory and the component inventory resulting from deliveries on already canceled purchase commitments. We expect that competitors will continue to market and sell inexpensive competitive products in the marketplace, thereby continuing to make it difficult for us to reduce our inventory levels further, which may eventually require that we write off our entire remaining $2.6 million inventory. If we are unable to sell a substantial amount of finished goods that we have not yet written off, our expected cash position throughout the remainder of 2003 will be even further materially and adversely impacted, which will harm our business, results of operations and financial condition.

If our Expresso and IntelliPOP products do not gain broader acceptance in the market, our business, financial condition and results of operations will be further harmed.

We launched our IntelliPOP 5000 product series in the first half of 2001 and have still not been successful in generating widespread customer interest in this product. Similarly, our sales of Expresso units have been below what we had anticipated. We must devote a substantial amount of human and capital resources in order to broaden commercial acceptance of our Expresso products and to gain commercial acceptance of our IntelliPOP products and expand our offerings of these products in the multi-dwelling unit, or MDU, and the multi-tenant commercial unit, or MCU, markets. However, to date, this commitment of resources to these product lines has not generated the commercial acceptance that we have sought for these products. Historically, the majority of our Expresso products have been sold into the MDU market. Our future success depends on our ability to continue to penetrate this market and to expand our penetration into the MCU market. Our success also depends on our ability to educate existing and potential customers and end-users about the benefits of our Fast Copper and Signature Switch technologies, our LongRun and IntelliPOP products, and about the development of new products to meet changing and expanding demands of service providers, MCU owners and corporate customers, including our new product offerings based on our acquisition of VTC. The future success of our Expresso and IntelliPOP products will also depend on the ability of our service provider customers to market and sell high-speed data services to end-users. If our IntelliPOP or Expresso products do not achieve broader commercial acceptance within the MDU market, MCU market, or in any other markets we may enter, our business, financial condition and results of operations will be further materially and adversely affected.

The market in which we operate is highly competitive, and we may not be able to compete effectively.

The market for video and broadband data systems is intensely competitive, and we expect that this market will continue to become more competitive in the future. Our immediate competitors include, or are expected to include, Cisco Systems, Inc., Harmonic Inc., Tandberg Television and a number of other public and private companies. Many of these competitors offer or may in the future offer technologies and services that directly compete with some or all of our high-speed access products and related software products. Also, many of these competitors continue to announce significant changes in their business plans and operations, some of which, such as major write downs of inventory, could result in lower priced products flooding the market, which would have a negative impact on our ability to sustain our current pricing and sell our inventory. In addition, the market in which we compete is characterized by increasing consolidation, and we cannot predict with certainty how industry consolidation will affect us or our competitors.

Our competitors and potential competitors may have substantially greater name recognition and technical, financial and marketing resources than we do, and we can give you no assurance that we will be able to compete effectively in our target markets. These competitors may be able to undertake more extensive marketing campaigns, adopt more aggressive pricing policies and devote substantially more resources to developing new products than we can. In addition, our HomeRun licensees may sell products based on our HomeRun technology to our competitors or potential competitors. This licensing may cause an erosion in the potential market for our Expresso products. We cannot assure you that we will have the financial resources, technical expertise or marketing, manufacturing, distribution and support capabilities to compete successfully. This competition could result in price reductions, reduced profit margins and loss of market share, which could harm our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Our copper-wire based solutions face severe competition from other technologies, and the commercial acceptance of any competing solutions could harm our ability to compete and thus materially and adversely impact our business, financial condition and results of operations.

The market for high-speed data access products and services is characterized by several competing technologies, including fiber optic cables, coaxial cables, satellites and other wireless facilities. These competing solutions provide fast access, high reliability and cost-effective solutions for some users. Many of our products are based on the use of copper telephone wire. Because there are physical limits to the speed and distance over which data can be transmitted over copper wire, our products may not be a viable solution for customers requiring service at performance levels beyond the current limits of copper telephone wire. To the extent that telecommunications service providers choose to install fiber optic cable or other transmission media in the last mile, or to the extent that homes and businesses install other transmission media within buildings, we expect that demand for our products that are based on copper telephone wires will decline. Commercial acceptance of any one of these competing solutions or any technological advancement or product introduction that provides faster access, greater reliability, increased cost-effectiveness or other advantages over technologies that utilize existing copper telephone wires could decrease the demand for our products and reduce average selling prices and gross margins associated with our products. The occurrence of any one or more of these events could harm our business, financial condition and results of operations.

If we fail to manage our operations in light of our changing revenue base, our ability to increase our revenues and improve our results of operations could be harmed.

Our operations have changed significantly due to volatility in our business. In the past, we rapidly and significantly expanded our operations. However, in fiscal years 2001 and 2002, we reduced our workforce significantly to control overall operating expenses in response to dramatic declines in, and the expectation of continued slowing of, our sales growth. We anticipate that, in the future, expansion in certain areas of our business may be required to expand our customer base and exploit market opportunities. In particular, we expect to face numerous challenges in the implementation of our business strategy to focus on selling our products to the larger, more established customers, such as ILECs and PTTs, in both domestic and international markets.

To exploit the market for our products, we must develop new and enhanced products while implementing and managing effective planning and operating processes. To manage our operations, we must, among other things, continue to implement and improve our operational, financial and management information systems, hire and train additional qualified personnel, continue to expand and upgrade core technologies and effectively manage multiple relationships with various customers, suppliers and other third parties. We cannot assure you that our systems, procedures or controls will be adequate to support our operations or that our management will be able to achieve the rapid execution necessary to exploit fully the market for our products or systems. If we are unable to manage our operations effectively, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be harmed.

We depend on international sales for a significant portion of our revenue, which subjects our business to a number of risks. If we are unable to generate significant international sales, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected.

Sales to customers outside of the United States accounted for approximately 18.2% and 52.2% of revenue for the six months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002, respectively. There are a number of risks arising from the operation of our international business, including, but not limited to:

We expect sales to customers outside of the United States to continue to represent a significant portion of our revenue. However, we cannot assure you that foreign markets for our products will develop at the rate or to the extent currently anticipated. If we fail to generate significant international sales, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected.

Our ability to attract and retain qualified personnel has been and may continue to be materially and adversely affected by our low stock price.

Our continued low stock price means that most of our outstanding employee stock options are “under water” or priced substantially above the current market price of our common stock. Our employees may have felt, and may continue to feel, that they are receiving inadequate compensation. Further, the continued adverse market conditions mean that our stock option offerings and our stock option plans may not offer current and potential future employees sufficient incentive to work for us. If adverse market conditions persist, our stock option offerings and employee stock plans will further diminish our ability to attract and/or retain qualified personnel, which will further materially and adversely impact our business, financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows.

Some of our customers have not been able to meet their financial obligations to us due to changes in the capital markets and these customers’ own precarious financial situations. If more of our customers experience similar financial difficulties, our revenue will decrease further, which would materially and adversely affect our business, operating results and financial condition.

Due to increased volatility in equity markets and tightening of lending in the credit markets, we are exposed to a significant risk that customers will not pay us the amounts that they owe us in order to conserve their capital. This would lead to increases in our outstanding accounts receivable as a percentage of revenue, extended payback periods and increased risk of customer default. For example, during the latter part of the fourth quarter of 2000, several key customers experienced a rapid deterioration in their ability to obtain additional capital to fund their businesses. As a result, these customers declared their inability to make timely payments on their accounts and were unable to demonstrate the ability to pay their existing account balances with us. During fiscal 2001, a significant number of these customers commenced bankruptcy proceedings. As of December 31, 2002, all of these bankruptcies were finalized, and we do not expect that we will collect any of the amounts owed to us by these customers.

We factor the increased risk of non-payment into our assessment of our customers’ ability to pay, and, in some instances, these considerations will result in longer revenue deferrals than we had anticipated at the time that we booked the sales to those customers. We also believe that certain of our customers will alter their plans to deploy products to meet the constraints imposed on them by changes in the capital markets. If we are not able to increase sales to other customers, or if our sales are otherwise delayed or revenue written off, our sales will continue to decline, which would further harm our business, operating results and financial condition.

If we inaccurately estimate customer demand, our business, results of operations and financial condition could be harmed.

We plan our expense levels in part based on our expectations about future revenue. These expense levels are relatively fixed in the short-term. However, the number of orders for our products may vary from quarter to quarter. In some circumstances, customers may delay purchasing our current products in favor of next-generation products. In addition, our new products are generally subject to technical evaluations by potential customers that typically last 60 to 90 days. In the case of InteliPOP and our turnkey video solutions, those evaluations may take up to several months or longer. If orders forecasted for a specific customer for a particular quarter are delayed or cancelled, our revenue for that quarter may be less than our forecast. Currently, we have minimal risk of loss associated with long-term customer commitments or penalties for delayed and/or cancelled orders. However, we may be unable to reduce our spending accordingly in the short-term if such a loss occurred, and any such revenue shortfall would have a direct and adverse impact on our results of operations for that quarter. Further, we outsource the manufacturing of our products based on forecasts of sales. If orders for our products exceed our forecasts, we may have difficulty meeting customers’ orders in a timely manner, which could damage our reputation or result in lost sales. Conversely, if our forecasts exceed the orders we actually receive and we are unable to cancel future purchase and manufacturing commitments in a timely manner, our inventory levels would increase. This could expose us to losses related to slow moving and obsolete inventory, which would have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results and financial condition.

We depend on contract manufacturers to manufacture all of our products and rely on them to deliver high-quality products in a timely manner. The failure of these manufacturers to continue to deliver quality products in a timely manner could have a materially adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

We do not manufacture our products. We rely on contract manufacturers to assemble, test and package our products. We cannot assure you that these contract manufacturers and suppliers will be able to meet our future requirements for manufactured products, components and subassemblies. In addition, we believe that current market conditions have placed additional financial strain on our contract manufacturers. Any interruption in the operations of one or more of these contract manufacturers would harm our ability to meet our scheduled product deliveries to customers. We also intend to introduce new products and product enhancements, which will require that we rapidly achieve volume production by coordinating our efforts with those of our suppliers and contract manufacturers. The inability of our contract manufacturers to provide us with adequate supplies of high-quality products or the loss of a current contract manufacturer would cause a delay in our ability to fulfill customer orders while we obtain a replacement manufacturer and would harm our business, operating results and financial condition. In addition, we have canceled certain finished goods and component orders, which may harm our relationship with certain contract manufacturers. Moreover, if we do not accurately forecast the actual demand for our products, we may face supply, manufacturing or testing capacity constraints. These constraints could result in delays in the delivery of our products or the loss of existing or potential customers, either of which could harm our business, operating results or financial condition.

Based on our building specifications, several key components are purchased from single or limited source suppliers, and if our contract manufacturers fail to obtain the raw materials and component products we require in a timely manner we could lose sales. If we lose sales, our business, financial condition and results of operations would be materially and adversely affected.

We currently purchase most of our raw materials and components used in our products through our contract manufacturers. In procuring components for our products, we and our contract manufacturers rely on some suppliers that are the sole source of those components, and we are dependent upon supplies from these sources to meet our needs. We also depend on various sole source offerings from Broadcom, Metalink US and Motorola for certain of our products. Components are purchased pursuant to purchase orders based on forecasts, but neither we nor our contract manufacturers have any guaranteed supply arrangements with these suppliers. The availability of many of these components depends in part on our ability to provide our contract manufacturers and their suppliers with accurate forecasts of our future needs. If we or our manufacturers are unable to obtain a sufficient supply of key components from current sources or if there is any interruption in the supply of any of the key components currently obtained from a single or limited source, we could experience difficulties in obtaining alternative sources at reasonable prices, if at all, or in altering product designs to use alternative components. Resulting delays and reductions in product shipments could damage customer relationships, disrupt our operations and harm our business, financial condition or results of operations. In addition, any increases in component costs that are passed on to our customers could reduce demand for our products.

We rely on third parties to test substantially all of our products. If, for any reason, these third parties were unable to or did not adequately assist us in controlling the quality of our products, this lack of quality control could harm our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Substantially all of our products are assembled and tested by our contract manufacturers. Although we perform random spot testing on manufactured products, we rely on our contract manufacturers for assembly and primary testing of our products. Any quality assurance problems could increase the cost of manufacturing, assembling or testing our products and could harm our business, financial condition and results of operation. Moreover, defects in products that are not discovered in the quality assurance process could damage customer relationships and result in product returns or product liability claims, each of which could harm our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Our business relies on the continued growth of the Internet; any slowdown in or reversal of the growth of Internet use could materially and adversely impact our business.

The market for high-speed data access products depends in large part on the continued use and popularity of the Internet. Issues concerning the use of the Internet, including security, lost or delayed packets, and quality of service may negatively affect the development of the market for our products, which could materially and adversely impact our business.

Our industry is characterized by rapid technological change. We must continually introduce new products that achieve broad market acceptance in order to address this change and remain competitive.

The markets for high-speed data access products are characterized by rapid technological developments, frequent enhancements to existing products and new product introductions, changes in end-user requirements and evolving industry standards. To remain competitive, we must continually improve the performance, features and reliability of our products, particularly in response to competitive product offerings. We must introduce products that incorporate or are compatible with these new technologies as they emerge and must do so in a timely manner. We cannot assure you that we will be able to respond quickly and effectively to technological change. We may have only limited time to penetrate certain markets, and we cannot assure you that we will be successful in achieving widespread acceptance of our products before competitors offer products and services similar or superior to our products. Any failure to introduce new products addressing technological changes or any delay in our product introductions could adversely affect our ability to compete and cause our operating results to be below our expectations or the expectations of public market analysts or investors. In addition, when we announce new products or product enhancements that have the potential to replace or shorten the life cycle of our existing products, customers may defer purchasing our existing products. These actions could harm our business, financial condition and operating results by unexpectedly decreasing sales, increasing our inventory levels of older products and exposing us to greater risk of product obsolescence.

Manufacturing or design defects in our products could harm our reputation and our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Any defect or deficiency in our products could reduce the functionality, effectiveness or marketability of our products. These defects or deficiencies could cause orders for our products to be canceled or delayed, reduce our revenue, or render our product designs obsolete. In that event, we would be required to devote substantial financial and other resources for a significant period of time to the development of new product designs. We cannot assure you that we would be successful in addressing any manufacturing or design defects in our products or in developing new product designs in a timely manner, if at all. Any of these events, individually or in the aggregate, could harm our business, financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows.

Changing industry standards may reduce the demand for our products, which would harm our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We will not be competitive unless we continually introduce new products and product enhancements that meet constantly changing industry standards. The emergence of new industry standards, whether through adoption by official standards committees or through widespread use of such standards by telephone companies or other service providers, could require that we redesign our products. If these standards become widespread and our products do not comply with these standards, our customers and potential customers may not purchase our products, which would harm our business, financial condition and results of operations. The rapid development of new standards increases the risk that competitors could develop products that make our products obsolete. Any failure by us to develop and introduce new products or enhancements directed at new industry standards could harm our business, financial condition and results of operations. In addition, selection of competing technologies as standards by standards setting bodies such as the HomePNA technology could negatively affect our reputation in the market, regardless of whether our products are standards-compliant or demand for our products does not decline. This selection could be interpreted by the press and others as having a negative impact on our business, which would negatively impact our stock price.

Further, the marketplace’s anticipation of an emerging standard, such as MPEG-4, Part 10 (H.264), could delay customers from making decisions to purchase or deploy existing products that we offer, which could adversely affect our sales.

A majority of our foreign sales are invoiced in U.S. dollars. As a result, fluctuations in currency exchange rates could cause our products to become relatively more expensive for international customers, thereby reducing demand for our products. We anticipate that foreign sales will generally continue to be invoiced in U.S. dollars. Accordingly, we do not currently engage in foreign currency hedging transactions. However, as we expand our current international operations, we may allow payment in foreign currencies and, as a result, our exposure to foreign currency transaction losses may increase. To reduce this exposure, we may purchase forward foreign exchange contracts or use other hedging strategies. However, we cannot assure you that any currency hedging strategy would be successful in avoiding exchange-related losses.

If we fail to protect our intellectual property or if others use our proprietary technology without our authorization, our competitive position may suffer.

Our future success and ability to compete depends in part on our proprietary technology. We rely on a combination of copyright, patent, trademark and trade secrets laws and nondisclosure agreements to establish and protect our proprietary technology. We currently hold 23 United States patents and have 43 United States patent applications pending. However, we cannot assure you that patents will be issued with respect to pending or future patent applications that we have filed or plan to file or that our patents will be upheld as valid or will prevent the development of competitive products or that any actions we have taken will adequately protect our intellectual property rights.

We generally enter into confidentiality agreements with our employees, consultants, resellers, customers and potential customers in which we strictly limit access to and distribution of our software and further limit the disclosure and use of our proprietary information. Despite our efforts to protect our proprietary rights, unauthorized parties may attempt to copy or otherwise obtain or use our products or technology. Our competitors may also independently develop technologies that are substantially equivalent or superior to our technology. In addition, the laws of some foreign countries do not protect our proprietary rights to the same extent as the laws of the United States.

We may be subject to intellectual property infringement claims that are costly to defend and could harm our business and ability to compete.

Our industry is characterized by vigorous protection and pursuit of intellectual property rights. We are subject to the risk of adverse claims and litigation alleging infringement of the intellectual property rights of others. From time to time, third parties may assert infringement claims with respect to our current or future products. Any such assertion, regardless of its merit, could require us to pay damages or settlement amounts and could require us to develop non-infringing technology or acquire licenses to the technology that is the subject of the asserted infringement. This litigation or potential litigation could result in product delays, increased costs or both. In addition, the cost of any litigation and the resulting distraction of our management resources to address such litigation could harm our business, results of operations or financial condition. We also cannot assure you that any licenses of technology necessary for our business will be available or that, if available, these licenses can be obtained on commercially reasonable terms. Our failure to obtain these licenses could harm our business, results of operations and financial condition.

If our products do not comply with complex government regulations, our products may not be sold, preventing us from increasing our revenue or achieving profitability.

We and our customers are subject to varying degrees of federal, state and local regulation. Our products must comply with various regulations and standards defined by the Federal Communications Commission, or FCC. The FCC has issued regulations that set installation and equipment standards for communications systems. Our products are also required to meet certain safety requirements. For example, certain of our products must be certified by Underwriters Laboratories in order to meet federal safety requirements relating to electrical appliances to be used inside the home. In addition, certain products must be Network Equipment Building Standard certified before they may be deployed by certain of our customers. Any delay in or failure to obtain these approvals could harm our business, financial condition or results of operations. Outside of the United States, our products are subject to the regulatory requirements of each country in which our products are manufactured or sold. These requirements are likely to vary widely. If we do not obtain timely domestic or foreign regulatory approvals or certificates, we would not be able to sell our products where these regulations apply, which may prevent us from sustaining our revenue or achieving profitability.

In addition, regulation of our customers may adversely impact our business, operating results and financial condition. For example, FCC regulatory policies affecting the availability of data and Internet services and other terms on which telecommunications companies conduct their business may impede our penetration of certain markets. In addition, the increasing demand for communications systems has exerted pressure on regulatory bodies worldwide to adopt new standards, generally following extensive investigation of competing technologies. The delays inherent in this governmental approval process may cause the cancellation, postponement or rescheduling of the installation of communications systems by our customers, which in turn may harm our sale of products to these customers.

If our customers do not receive adequate and timely customer support from us or our third-party providers, our relationships with our customers could be damaged, which would harm our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Our ability to achieve our planned sales growth and retain customers will depend in part on the quality of our customer support operations. Our customers generally require significant support and training with respect to our products, particularly in the initial deployment and implementation stage. As our systems and products become more complex, we believe our ability to provide adequate customer support will be increasingly important to our success. Moreover, we believe that our IntelliPOP products will add a significant layer of complexity to the demands placed on our customer support organizations. We have limited experience with widespread deployment of our products to a diverse customer base, and we cannot assure you that we will have adequate personnel to provide the levels of support that our customers may require during initial product deployment or on an ongoing basis. In addition, we rely on a third party for a substantial portion of our customer support functions, and therefore, we may have limited control over the level of support that is provided. Our failure to provide sufficient support to our customers could delay or prevent the successful deployment of our products. Failure to provide adequate support could also have an adverse impact on our reputation and relationship with our customers, could prevent us from gaining new customers and could harm our business, financial condition or results of operations.

If we lose key personnel or are unable to hire additional qualified personnel as necessary, we may not be able to manage our business successfully, which could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We depend on the performance of Salvatore D’Auria, our President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board, and on other senior management and technical personnel with experience in the data communications, telecommunications and high-speed data access industries. The loss of any one of them could harm our ability to execute our business strategy. Additionally, we do not have employment contracts with any of our executive officers. We believe that our future success will depend in large part on our continued ability to identify, hire, retain and motivate highly skilled employees who are in great demand. We cannot assure you that we will be able to do so.

Our stock price has fluctuated and is likely to continue to fluctuate, and you may not be able to resell your shares at or above their purchase price.

The price of our common stock has been and is likely to continue to be highly volatile. Our stock price could continue to fluctuate widely in response to many factors, including, but not limited to, the following:

In addition, in recent years, the stock market in general, and the Nasdaq National Market and the securities of Internet and technology companies in particular, have experienced extreme price and volume fluctuations with severe drops. These fluctuations have often been unrelated or disproportionate to the operating performance of these technology companies. These market and industry factors may harm our stock price, regardless of our operating results.

Nasdaq corporate governance rules require that all shares listed on the Nasdaq National Market maintain a minimum bid price at closing of $1.00 per share. Our failure to maintain such a minimum bid price for a period of thirty or more consecutive trading days could result in the Nasdaq governing board taking action to remove our shares from the Nasdaq National Market. In the second half of 2002, the minimum closing bid price of our common stock was consistently below $1.00 per share. On September 9, 2002, we received a Nasdaq delisting notice because our common stock had closed below $1.00 per share for 30 consecutive trading days. If the bid price of our common stock had not closed at $1.00 per share or more for a minimum of 10 consecutive trading days before December 9, 2002, our stock would have been delisted from the Nasdaq National Market. On November 15, 2002, we received a notice from the Nasdaq that our stock price had traded above $1.00 per share for the required 10 consecutive days. Since that time, our stock has not traded below the required minimum bid price at closing of $1.00 per share. However, based on the various risks noted elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10Q as well as the fact that our stock price has traded below $4.00 per share, we nevertheless continue to face the risk of a delisting from the Nasdaq National Market. The delisting of our common stock as well as the threat of delisting of our common stock may negatively impact the value of our shares because shares that trade on the over-the-counter market, rather than the Nasdaq National Market, are typically less liquid and, therefore, trade with larger variations between the bid and asking price.

Our charter, bylaws, retention and change of control plans and Delaware law contain provisions that could delay or prevent a change in control.

Certain provisions of our charter and bylaws and our retention and change of control plans, the “Plans,” may have the effect of making it more difficult for a third party to acquire, or of discouraging a third party from attempting to acquire, control of us. The provisions of the charter and bylaws and the Plans could limit the price that certain investors may be willing to pay in the future for shares of our common stock. Our charter and bylaws provide for a classified board of directors, eliminate cumulative voting in the election of directors, restrict our stockholders from acting by written consent and calling special meetings, and provide for procedures for advance notification of stockholder nominations and proposals. In addition, our board of directors has the authority to issue up to 5,000,000 shares of preferred stock and to determine the price, rights, preferences, privileges and restrictions, including voting rights, of those shares without any further vote or action by the stockholders. The issuance of preferred stock, while providing flexibility in connection with possible financings or acquisitions or other corporate purposes, could have the effect of making it more difficult for a third party to acquire a majority of our outstanding voting stock. The Plans provide for severance payments and accelerated stock option vesting in the event of termination of employment following a change of control. The provisions of the charter and bylaws, and the Plans, as well as Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law, to which we are subject, could discourage potential acquisition proposals, delay or prevent a change of control and prevent changes in our management.

Sales of a substantial number of shares of our common stock in the public market, or the appearance that these shares are available for sale, could harm the market price of our common stock. Also, we may from time to time need to register shares of our common stock for resale, which registration and resale may increase the number of our shares that are publicly-traded, thereby adversely impacting the per share price of our common stock. In connection with our acquisition of VTC, in May 2003 we registered on a Form S-3 pursuant to Rule 415(a)(1)(i) under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, on a continuous or delayed offering the 3.3 million shares of common stock issued to Tektronix, in order that Tektronix may sell such shares on or after December 1, 2003. These sales also may make it more difficult for us to sell equity securities or equity-related securities in the future at a time and price that we deem appropriate. As of June 30, 2003, we had 19,991,689 shares outstanding. Of these shares, 16,708,092 shares of our common stock are currently available for sale in the public market, some of which are subject to volume and other limitations under securities laws.

Our Pleasanton, California facility is located near known earthquake fault zones, and the occurrence of an earthquake or other natural disaster could cause damage to our facility and equipment, which could require us to curtail or cease operations.

Our Pleasanton, California facility is located in the San Francisco Bay Area near known earthquake fault zones and is vulnerable to damage from earthquakes. In October 1989, a major earthquake that caused significant property damage and a number of fatalities struck this area. We are also vulnerable to damage from other types of disasters, including fire, floods, power loss, communications failures and similar events. If any disaster were to occur, our ability to operate our business at our Pleasanton, California facility could be seriously, or completely, impaired. The insurance we maintain may not be adequate to cover our losses resulting from disasters or other business interruptions.

We rely on a continuous power supply to conduct our operations, and a statewide energy crisis could disrupt our operations and increase our expenses.

In the fourth quarter of 2000 and the first quarter of 2001, California suffered an energy crisis that could have disrupted our operations and increased our expenses. In the event of an acute power shortage which occurs when power reserves for the State of California fall below 1.5%, California has on some occasions implemented, and may in the future implement, rolling blackouts throughout the state. We currently do not have backup generators or alternate sources of power in the event of a blackout, and our current insurance does not provide coverage for any damages we or our customers may suffer as a result of any interruption in our power supply. If California were to suffer a similar energy crisis in the future and blackouts interrupt our power supply, we would be temporarily unable to continue operations at our Pleasanton, California facility. Any such interruption in our ability to continue operations at our facilities could damage our reputation, harm our ability to retain existing customers and to obtain new customers, and could result in lost revenue, any of which could substantially harm our business and results of operations.

We are exposed to changes in interest rates primarily from our investments in certain held-to-maturity securities. Under our current policies, we do not use interest rate derivative instruments to manage exposure to interest rate changes. A hypothetical 100 basis point adverse move in interest rates along the entire interest rate yield curve would not materially affect the fair value of our interest-sensitive financial instruments at June 30, 2003.

We have no investments, nor are any significant sales, expenses, or other financial items denominated in foreign country currencies. All of our international sales are denominated in U.S. dollars. An increase in the value of the U.S. dollar relative to foreign currencies could make our products more expensive and, therefore, reduce the demand for our products.

(a) ) Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures. The Company carried out an evaluation under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)), as of the end of the period covered by this report. There are inherent limitations to the effectiveness of any system of disclosure controls and procedures, including the possibility of human error and the circumvention or overriding of the controls and procedures. Accordingly, even effective disclosure controls and procedures can only provide reasonable assurance of achieving their control objectives. Notwithstanding these limitations, as of the end of the period covered by this report, based upon the Company’s evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the disclosure controls and procedures are effective in all material respects to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports the Company files and submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported as and when required.

(b) Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. There has not been any change in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Company’s last fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that was identified in connection with the Company’s evaluation of its internal control over financial reporting.

The Company’s Annual Meeting of Stockholders was held on June 4, 2003 (the “Annual Meeting”). At the Annual Meeting, stockholders voted on two matters: (i) the election of two Class II directors for a term of three years expiring in 2006, and (ii) the ratification of the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the Company’s independent auditors. The stockholders elected management’s nominees as the Class II directors in an uncontested election and ratified the appointment of the independent auditors by the following votes, respectively:

The Company’s Board of Directors is currently comprised of five members who are divided into three classes with overlapping three-year terms.

(ii) Ratification of appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as independent auditors:

The Company filed the following Current Report on Forms 8-K during the quarter ended June 30, 2003:

On April 30, 2003, the Company filed a Report on Form 8-K regarding the Company’s issuance of a press release stating its earnings for the quarter ended March 31, 2003 and announcing the appointment of a new chief financial officer.

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

TUT SYSTEMS, INC.

By:		/s/ RANDALL K. GAUSMAN
		Randall K. Gausman Vice-President, Finance and Administration, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer and Duly Authorized Officer)

Delaware		94-2958543
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

5200 Franklin Drive, Suite 100, Pleasanton, California		94588
(Address of principal executive offices)		(Zip Code)


PART I.	FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1.	Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited):

	Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2003 and December 31, 2002	3

	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2003 and June 30, 2002	4

	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the six months ended June 30, 2003 and June 30, 2002	5

	Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements	6

Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	16

Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk	38

Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	38

PART II.	OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	39

Item 2.	Changes in Securities and Use of Proceeds	40

Item 3.	Defaults Upon Senior Securities	40

Item 4.	Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders	40

Item 5.	Other Information	40

Item 6.	Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K	40

Signatures		42

	June 30, 2003			December 31, 2002
	(unaudited)
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	15,682		$	25,571
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $7 and $10 in 2003 and 2002, respectively		4,892			1,972
Inventories, net		2,596			3,888
Prepaid expenses and other		1,454			1,082

Total current assets		24,624			32,513
Property and equipment, net		1,658			1,630
Intangibles and other assets		4,542			5,586

Total assets	$	30,824		$	39,729

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable	$	1,086		$	1,272
Accrued liabilities		1,888			5,924
Deferred revenue		399			921

Total current liabilities		3,373			8,117
Note Payable		3,390			3,262
Deferred revenue, net of current portion		—			35
Other liabilities		75			84

Total liabilities		6,838			11,498

Commitments and contingencies (Note 6)
Stockholders’ equity:
Common stock, $0.001 par value, 100,000 shares authorized, 19,992 and 19,796 shares issued and outstanding in 2003 and 2002, respectively		20			20
Additional paid-in capital		304,899			304,888
Accumulated other comprehensive loss		(141	)		(141	)
Accumulated deficit		(280,792	)		(276,536	)

Total stockholders’ equity		23,986			28,231

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	30,824		$	39,729

	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2003			2002			2003			2002
Revenues:
Product	$	7,700		$	2,314		$	14,101		$	4,476
License and royalty		165			200			365			396

Total revenues		7,865			2,514			14,466			4,872

Cost of goods sold:
Product		4,015			6,568			7,274			8,091

Total cost of goods sold		4,015			6,568			7,274			8,091

Gross margin (loss)		3,850			(4,054	)		7,192			(3,219	)

Operating expenses:
Sales and marketing		1,927			2,466			3,854			4,782
Research and development		2,248			3,499			4,334			6,786
General and administrative		1,105			1,245			2,307			3,203
Impairment of intangible assets		128			—			128			—
Amortization of intangible assets		459			299			918			599

Total operating expenses		5,867			7,509			11,541			15,370

Loss from operations		(2,017	)		(11,563	)		(4,349	)		(18,589	)
Impairment of certain equity investments		—			(592	)		—			(592	)
Interest and other (expense) income, net		(8	)		183			93			428

Net loss	$	(2,025	)	$	(11,972	)	$	(4,256	)	$	(18,753	)

Net loss per share, basic and diluted (Note 3)	$	(0.10	)	$	(0.73	)		(0.21	)	$	(1.14	)

Shares used in computing net loss per share, basic and diluted (Note 3)		19,894			16,455			19,848			16,431

	Six Months Ended June 30,
	2003			2002
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net loss	$	(4,256	)	$	(18,753	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:
Depreciation and other		488			1,750
Provision (recovery) for doubtful accounts		3			(735	)
Provision for excess and obsolete inventory and abandoned products		15			5,124
Write off of certain equity investments		—			592
Impairment of intangibles		128			—
Amortization of intangibles		918			599
Change in operating assets and liabilities, net of businesses acquired:
Accounts receivable		(2,923	)		422
Inventories		1,277			1,615
Prepaid expenses and other assets		(372	)		(610	)
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities		(4,231	)		(1,594	)
Deferred revenue		(559	)		(513	)

Net cash used in operating activities		(9,512	)		(12,103	)

Cash flows from investing activities:
Purchase of property and equipment		(516	)		(296	)
Proceeds from maturities of short-term investments		—			3,105

Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities		(516	)		2,809

Cash flows from financing activities:
Proceeds from issuances of common stock, net		11			67
Deferred interest on note payable		128			—
Repayment of note receivable		—			33

Net cash provided by financing activities		139			100

Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents		(9,889	)		(9,194	)
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period		25,571			46,338

Cash and cash equivalents, end of period	$	15,682		$	37,144

	June 30, 2003			December 31, 2002
Inventories, net:
Finished goods	$	2,518		$	3,667
Raw materials		78			221

	$	2,596		$	3,888

Property and equipment:
Computers and software	$	1,148		$	932
Test equipment		1,801			1,501
Office equipment		33			33

		2,982			2,466
Less: accumulated depreciation		(1,324	)		(836	)

	$	1,658		$	1,630

Accrued liabilities:
Provision for loss on purchase commitments	$	—		$	3,700
Professional Services		196			612
Compensation		863			604
Restructuring accrual		—			473
Other		829			535

	$	1,888		$	5,924

	As of June 30, 2003
	Gross Carrying Amount		Accumulated Amortization			Net Intangibles
Amortized intangibles assets:
Completed technology and patents	$	8,127	$	(4,252	)	$	3,875
Contract backlog		247		(141	)		106
Customer lists		86		(8	)		78
Maintenance contract renewals		50		(7	)		43
Trademarks		315		(30	)		285

	$	8,825	$	(4,438	)	$	4,387

Other non-current assets							155

						$	4,542

	As of December 31, 2002
	Gross Carrying Amount		Accumulated Amortization		Net Intangibles
Amortized intangibles assets:
Completed technology and patents	$	8,253	(3,473	)	$	4,780
Contract backlog		247	(35	)		212
Customer lists		86	(2	)		84
Maintenance contract renewals		50	(2	)		48
Trademarks		315	(8	)		307

	$	8,951	(3,520	)		5,431

Other non-current assets						155

					$	5,586

Remainder of 2003	$	898
2004		1,584
2005		953
2006		483
2007		363
Thereafter		106

	$	4,387

	Three Months Ended June 30, 2002						Six Months Ended June 30, 2002
	Actual			Pro Forma			Actual			Pro Forma
Net Revenue	$	2,514		$	6,758		$	4,872		$	12,515
Net Loss	$	(11,972	)	$	(12,838	)	$	(18,753	)	$	(21,259	)
Net loss per share, basic and diluted	$	(0.73	)	$	(0.65	)	$	(1.14	)	$	(1.08	)
Shares used in computing net loss per share, basic and diluted		16,455			19,739			16,431			19,715

	Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
	2003		2002		2003		2002
Total revenues	100.0	%	100.0	%	100.0	%	100.0	%
Total cost of goods sold	51.1		261.3		50.3		166.1

Gross (loss) margin	48.9		(161.3	)	49.7		(66.1	)

Operating expenses:
Sales and marketing	24.5		98.1		26.6		98.2
Research and development	28.6		139.2		30.0		139.3
General administrative	14.1		49.5		16.0		65.7
Impairment of intangibles	1.6		—		0.9		—
Amortization of intangibles	5.8		11.9		6.3		12.3

Total operating expenses	74.6		298.7		79.8		315.5

Loss from operations	(25.7	)	(460.0	)	(30.1	)	(381.6	)
Impairment of certain equity investments			(23.5	)			(12.2	)
Interest and other income, net	(0.1	)	7.3		0.6		8.8

Net loss	(25.8	)%	(476.2	)%	(29.5	)%	(385.0	)%

Remainder of 2003	$	550,000
2004		806,000
2005		269,000
Thereafter		—

	$	1,625,000

	Votes For	Votes Against	Votes Abstained
Neil Douglas	14,931,221	104,774	0
George Middlemas	15,006,824	29,171	0

Exhibit Number		Description

2.1		Agreement and Plan of Reorganization dated as of October 15, 1999, by and among the Company, Vintel Acquisition Corp., and Vintel Communications, Inc.(4)

2.2		Agreement and Plan of Reorganization dated as of June 8, 1999, by and among the Company, Public Port Acquisition Corporation, and Public Port, Inc.(3)

2.3		Agreement and Plan of Reorganization dated as of November 16, 1999, as amended, by and among the Company, Fortress Acquisition Corporation and FreeGate Corporation.(5)

2.4		Asset Purchase Agreement by and between the Company and OneWorld Systems, Inc. dated as of February 3, 2000.(6)


2.5		Amendment No. 1 to Asset Purchase Agreement by and between the Company and OneWorld Systems, Inc. dated as of February 17, 2000.(6)

2.6		Agreement for the sale and purchase of the entire share capital of Xstreamis plc, by and among the Company, the shareholders of Xstreamis plc and Philip Corbishley.(8)

2.7		Agreement and Plan of Reorganization dated as of December 21, 2000, by and among the Company, ActiveTelco Incorporated, ActiveTelco Acquisition Corporation, and, with respect to Article VII only, Azeem Butt, as shareholder representative, and U.S. Bank Trust, as escrow agent.(10)

2.8		Agreement and Plan of Merger by and among Tut System, Inc., Tiger Acquisition Corporation, Textronix, Inc. and Video Tele.com, Inc. dated as of October 28, 2002.(12)

3.1		Second Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Company.(1)

3.2		Bylaws of the Company, as currently in effect.(1)

4.1		Specimen Common Stock Certificate.(1)

10.1		1992 Stock Plan, as amended, and form of Stock Option Agreement thereunder.(1)

10.2		1998 Stock Plan and forms of Stock Option Agreement and Stock Purchase Agreement thereunder.(1)

10.3		1998 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, as amended.(2)

10.4		1998 Stock Plan Inland Revenue Approved Rules for UK Employees.(6)

10.5		American Capital Marketing, Inc. 401(k) Plan.(1)

10.6		Fourth Amended and Restated Shareholders’ Rights Agreement, dated December 16, 1997, between the Company and certain stockholders.(1)

10.7		Lease by and between Pleasant Hill Industrial Park Associates, a California Limited Partnership, and the Company dated April 4, 1995, as amended.(1)

10.8		Office Building Lease between Petula Associates, Ltd., an Iowa corporation, and Principal Mutual Life Insurance Co., an Iowa corporation, doing business as RC Creekside Phase VI and the Company dated April 25, 1997.(1)

10.9		Licensing and Cooperative Marketing Agreement between Microsoft Corporation and the Company dated August 27, 1997, as modified and restated on July 30, 1998.(1)

10.10		Form of Indemnification Agreement entered into between the Company and each director and officer.(1)

10.11		Employment Agreement by and between the Company, FreeGate Corporation and Sandy Benett dated as of November 17, 1999.(6)

10.12		Non-competition Agreement by and between the Company, FreeGate Corporation and Sandy Benett dated as of November 17, 1999.(6)

10.13		Agreement and General Release between the Company and And Yet, Inc. dated July 31, 1998.(1)

10.14		Software License Agreement between RouterWare, Inc. and the Company dated December 16, 1997.(1)

10.15		Home Phoneline Promoters Agreement by and between the Company and IBM Corporation, Hewlett-Packard Company, Compaq Computer Corporation, Advanced Micro Devices, Inc., Intel Corporation, Epigram, Inc., AT&T Wireless Services Inc., 3Com Corporation, Rockwell Semiconductor Systems, Inc. and Lucent Technologies Inc. dated June 1, 1998.(1)

10.16		Master Agreement between the Company and Compaq Computer Corporation dated April 21, 1998 including supplements thereto.(1)

10.17		Loan Agreement, General Security Agreement, and Collateral Assignment and Patent Mortgage and Security Agreement with Imperial Bank, each dated August 16, 1997.(1)

10.18		Loan and Security Agreement, Streamlined Facility Agreement, Revolving Credit Note, Patent and Trademark Security Agreement, Security Agreement in Copyrighted Works and Stock Subscription Warrant between the Company and TransAmerica Business Credit Corporation, each dated December 18, 1998.(1)

10.19		Extension Agreement among the Company, And Yet, Inc. and Marty Graham dated December 21, 1998.(1)

10.20		Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of May 26, 2000, by and between the Company and Xstreamis Plc stockholders listed therein.(7)

10.21		Commercial Office Lease between Las Positas LLC and the Company, dated March 8, 2000.(7)

10.22		Executive Retention and Change of Control Plan.(9)

10.23		Non-Executive Retention and Change of Control Plan and Summary Plan Description.(9)

10.24		Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement issued to Mark Carpenter on March 3, 2000.(9)

10.25		Indemnification Agreement by and between the Company and Alida Rincon, effective as of March 3, 2000.(11)

10.26		Indemnification Agreement by and between the Company and Marilyn Lobel, effective as of April 17, 2001.(13)

10.27		Office Lease Agreeement between The Ricnard Oppenheimer Living Trust, The Maurice Oppenheimer Living Trust, The Helene Oppenheimer Living Trust and Tut Sytems, Inc. dated November 2002.(13)

11.1		Calculation of net loss per share (contained in Note 3 of Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements).

31.1		Certification of Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 240.13a-14 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

31.2		Certification of Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 240.13a-14 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32.1		Certification of Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32.2		Certification of Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

	Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
	2003		2002		2003		2002
United States	$	6,109	$	1,555	$	11,840	$	2,331
International:
Canada		589		96		708		160
Great Britain		191		230		197		481
Hong Kong		330		—		330		—
Ireland		291		208		545		208
Japan		72		251		236		912
Mexico		175		—		330		404
All other countries		108		174		280		376

	$	7,865	$	2,514	$	14,466	$	4,872

Exhibit Number		Description

2.1		Agreement and Plan of Reorganization dated as of October 15, 1999, by and among the Company, Vintel Acquisition Corp., and Vintel Communications, Inc.(4)

2.2		Agreement and Plan of Reorganization dated as of June 8, 1999, by and among the Company, Public Port Acquisition Corporation, and Public Port, Inc.(3)

2.3		Agreement and Plan of Reorganization dated as of November 16, 1999, as amended, by and among the Company, Fortress Acquisition Corporation and FreeGate Corporation.(5)

2.4		Asset Purchase Agreement by and between the Company and OneWorld Systems, Inc. dated as of February 3, 2000.(6)

2.5		Amendment No. 1 to Asset Purchase Agreement by and between the Company and OneWorld Systems, Inc. dated as of February 17, 2000.(6)

2.6		Agreement for the sale and purchase of the entire share capital of Xstreamis plc, by and among the Company, the shareholders of Xstreamis plc and Philip Corbishley.(8)

2.7		Agreement and Plan of Reorganization dated as of December 21, 2000, by and among the Company, ActiveTelco Incorporated, ActiveTelco Acquisition Corporation, and, with respect to Article VII only, Azeem Butt, as shareholder representative, and U.S. Bank Trust, as escrow agent. (10)

2.8		Agreement and Plan of Merger by and among Tut Systems, Inc., Tiger Acquisition Corporation, Tektronix, Inc. and VideoTele.com, Inc. dated as of October 28, 2002. (12)

3.1		Second Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Company. (1)

3.2		Bylaws of the Company, as currently in effect. (1)

4.1		Specimen Common Stock Certificate. (1)

10.1		1992 Stock Plan, as amended, and form of Stock Option Agreement thereunder. (1)

10.2		1998 Stock Plan and forms of Stock Option Agreement and Stock Purchase Agreement thereunder. (1)

10.3		1998 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, as amended. (2)

10.4		1998 Stock Plan Inland Revenue Approved Rules for UK Employees. (6)

10.5		American Capital Marketing, Inc. 401(k) Plan. (1)

10.6		Fourth Amended and Restated Shareholders’ Rights Agreement, dated December 16, 1997, between the Company and certain stockholders. (1)


10.25		1999 Non-Statutory Stock Option Plan.(11)

10.26		Office Lease Agreement between Kruse Way Office Associates Limited Partnership and Video Tele.com dated April 28, 2000.(13)

10.27		Office Lease Agreement between The Richard Oppenheimer Living Trust, The Maurice Oppenheimer Living Trust, The Helene Oppenheimer Living Trust, and Tut Systems Inc. dated November 2002. (13)

11.1		Calculation of earnings per share (contained in Note 3 of Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements).

31.1		Certification of Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 240.13a-14 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

31.2		Certification of Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 240.13a-14 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32.1		Certification of Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32.2		Certification of Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.