UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
x | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended: June 1, 2003
OR
¨ | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission file number 1-8738
SEALY CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware | 36-3284147 | |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) | |
Sealy Drive One Office Parkway Trinity, North Carolina |
27370 | |
(Address of principal executive offices)* | (Zip Code) |
(336) 861-3500
Registrants telephone number, including area code
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No x
The number of shares of the registrants common stock outstanding as of June 30, 2003 was 31,268,742.
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements
SEALY CORPORATION
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations
(In thousands, except per share data)
(Unaudited)
Quarter Ended June 1, 2003 |
Quarter Ended June 2, 2002 |
|||||||
Net salesNon-affiliates |
$ | 261,619 | $ | 260,134 | ||||
Net salesAffiliates |
8,157 | 39,621 | ||||||
Total net sales |
269,776 | 299,755 | ||||||
Costs and expenses: |
||||||||
Cost of goods soldNon-affiliates |
157,069 | 147,148 | ||||||
Cost of goods soldAffiliates |
4,881 | 23,114 | ||||||
Total cost of goods sold |
161,950 | 170,262 | ||||||
Gross profit |
107,826 | 129,493 | ||||||
Selling, general and administrative |
92,716 | 119,671 | ||||||
Stock based compensation |
450 | 654 | ||||||
Business closure charge (Note 4) |
| 5,802 | ||||||
Amortization of intangibles |
273 | 95 | ||||||
Royalty income, net |
(2,848 | ) | (3,111 | ) | ||||
Income from operations |
17,235 | 6,382 | ||||||
Interest expense |
16,875 | 18,236 | ||||||
Other expense, net (Note 6) |
1,797 | 2,370 | ||||||
Loss before income tax benefit |
(1,437 | ) | (14,224 | ) | ||||
Income tax benefit |
(419 | ) | (5,832 | ) | ||||
Net loss |
(1,018 | ) | (8,392 | ) | ||||
Liquidation preference for common L & M shares |
5,114 | 4,640 | ||||||
Net loss available to common shareholders |
$ | (6,132 | ) | $ | (13,032 | ) | ||
Earnings per sharebasic: |
||||||||
Net lossbasic |
$ | (0.03 | ) | $ | (0.27 | ) | ||
Liquidation preference for common L & M shares |
(0.16 | ) | (0.15 | ) | ||||
Net loss available to common shareholders |
$ | (0.19 | ) | $ | (0.42 | ) | ||
Earnings per sharediluted: |
||||||||
Net lossdiluted |
$ | (0.03 | ) | $ | (0.27 | ) | ||
Liquidation preference for common L & M shares |
(0.16 | ) | (0.15 | ) | ||||
Net loss available to common shareholders |
$ | (0.19 | ) | $ | (0.42 | ) | ||
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding: |
||||||||
Basic |
31,176 | 30,779 | ||||||
Diluted |
31,176 | 30,779 |
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
2
SEALY CORPORATION
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations
(In thousands, except per share data)
(Unaudited)
Six Months Ended June 1, 2003 |
Six Months Ended June 2, 2002 |
|||||||
Net salesNon-affiliates |
$ | 539,022 | $ | 513,318 | ||||
Net salesAffiliates |
19,065 | 78,210 | ||||||
Total net sales |
558,087 | 591,528 | ||||||
Costs and expenses: |
||||||||
Cost of goods soldNon-affiliates |
316,021 | 292,984 | ||||||
Cost of goods soldAffiliates |
11,284 | 42,288 | ||||||
Total cost of goods sold |
327,305 | 335,272 | ||||||
Gross profit |
230,782 | 256,256 | ||||||
Selling, general and administrative |
185,373 | 213,357 | ||||||
Stock based compensation |
990 | 1,228 | ||||||
Business closure charge (Note 4) |
| 5,802 | ||||||
Amortization of intangibles |
533 | 268 | ||||||
Royalty income, net |
(5,561 | ) | (5,598 | ) | ||||
Income from operations |
49,447 | 41,199 | ||||||
Interest expense |
33,952 | 37,492 | ||||||
Other expense, net (Note 6) |
1,501 | 3,586 | ||||||
Income before income tax expense |
13,994 | 121 | ||||||
Income tax expense |
5,919 | 67 | ||||||
Net income |
8,075 | 54 | ||||||
Liquidation preference for common L & M shares |
10,228 | 9,280 | ||||||
Net loss available to common shareholders |
$ | (2,153 | ) | $ | (9,226 | ) | ||
Earnings per sharebasic: |
||||||||
Net incomebasic |
$ | 0.26 | $ | | ||||
Liquidation preference for common L & M shares |
(0.33 | ) | (0.30 | ) | ||||
Net loss available to common shareholders |
$ | (0.07 | ) | $ | (0.30 | ) | ||
Earnings per sharediluted: |
||||||||
Net income-diluted |
$ | 0.26 | $ | | ||||
Liquidation preference for common L & M shares |
(0.33 | ) | (0.30 | ) | ||||
Net loss available to common shareholders |
$ | (0.07 | ) | $ | (0.30 | ) | ||
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding: |
||||||||
Basic |
31,216 | 30,825 | ||||||
Diluted |
31,216 | 30,825 |
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
3
SEALY CORPORATION
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
(In thousands)
(Unaudited)
June 1, 2003 |
December 1, 2002* |
|||||||
ASSETS |
||||||||
Current assets: |
||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 35,242 | $ | 27,443 | ||||
Accounts receivableNon-affiliates, net |
179,414 | 164,742 | ||||||
Accounts receivableAffiliates, net (Note 13) |
4,268 | 3,753 | ||||||
Inventories |
55,887 | 53,387 | ||||||
Prepaid expenses, deferred taxes and other current assets |
47,777 | 42,698 | ||||||
322,588 | 292,023 | |||||||
Property, plant and equipment, at cost |
294,064 | 280,626 | ||||||
Less: accumulated depreciation |
(118,265 | ) | (106,701 | ) | ||||
175,799 | 173,925 | |||||||
Other assets: |
||||||||
Goodwill |
381,813 | 374,946 | ||||||
Other intangibles, net |
5,182 | 5,078 | ||||||
Long-term notes receivable (Note 13) |
12,022 | 12,022 | ||||||
Investments in and advances to affiliates (Note 13). |
| 12,950 | ||||||
Debt issuance costs, net, and other assets |
32,327 | 34,004 | ||||||
431,344 | 439,000 | |||||||
$ | 929,731 | $ | 904,948 | |||||
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY (DEFICIT) |
||||||||
Current liabilities: |
||||||||
Current portion of long-term obligations |
$ | 5,412 | $ | 33,338 | ||||
Accounts payable |
78,504 | 69,090 | ||||||
Accrued interest |
23,124 | 14,263 | ||||||
Accrued incentives and advertising |
37,318 | 41,530 | ||||||
Accrued compensation |
17,020 | 24,482 | ||||||
Other accrued expenses |
43,039 | 43,497 | ||||||
204,417 | 226,200 | |||||||
Long-term obligations, net |
745,296 | 719,896 | ||||||
Other noncurrent liabilities |
47,604 | 46,805 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes |
22,650 | 27,787 | ||||||
Stockholders equity (deficit): |
||||||||
Common stock |
323 | 321 | ||||||
Additional paid-in capital |
146,225 | 146,140 | ||||||
Accumulated deficit |
(211,691 | ) | (219,766 | ) | ||||
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
(12,029 | ) | (29,371 | ) | ||||
Common stock held in treasury, at cost |
(13,064 | ) | (13,064 | ) | ||||
(90,236 | ) | (115,740 | ) | |||||
$ | 929,731 | $ | 904,948 | |||||
* | Condensed from audited financial statements. |
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
4
SEALY CORPORATION
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(In thousands)
(Unaudited)
Six Months Ended June 1, 2003 |
Six Months Ended June 2, 2002 |
|||||||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
$ | 9,161 | $ | 48,869 | ||||
Cash flows from investing activities: |
||||||||
Purchase of property, plant and equipment, net |
(5,909 | ) | (7,714 | ) | ||||
Cash received from (paid on) affiliate note and investment |
13,611 | (12,500 | ) | |||||
Other |
| (1,390 | ) | |||||
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities |
7,702 | (21,604 | ) | |||||
Cash flows from financing activities: |
||||||||
Treasury stock repurchase, including direct expenses |
| (801 | ) | |||||
Proceeds from issuance of long-term obligations |
51,500 | | ||||||
Prepayment of Tranche debt |
(49,000 | ) | | |||||
Repayments of long-term obligations, net |
(8,171 | ) | (1,383 | ) | ||||
Equity contributions |
87 | 428 | ||||||
Purchase of interest rate cap agreement |
| (625 | ) | |||||
Debt issuance costs |
(3,480 | ) | | |||||
Net cash used in financing activities |
(9,064 | ) | (2,381 | ) | ||||
Change in cash and cash equivalents |
7,799 | 24,884 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents: |
||||||||
Beginning of period |
27,443 | 12,010 | ||||||
End of period |
$ | 35,242 | $ | 36,894 | ||||
Supplemental disclosures: |
||||||||
Selected non-cash items: |
||||||||
Non-cash compensation |
$ | 990 | $ | 1,228 | ||||
Depreciation and amortization |
11,457 | 10,917 | ||||||
Business closure charge |
| 5,802 | ||||||
Write-off of deferred debts costs and dedesignated cash flow hedge associated with the early extinguishment of debt |
2,531 | | ||||||
Non-cash interest expense associated with: |
||||||||
Junior Subordinated Notes |
2,756 | 2,575 | ||||||
Debt issuance costs |
2,806 | 2,143 | ||||||
Discount on Senior Subordinated Notes, net |
390 | 6,034 | ||||||
Net interest (income) expense associated with interest rate swap and cap agreements |
(32 | ) | 489 |
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements
5
SEALY CORPORATION
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 1: Basis of Presentation
The condensed consolidated interim financial statements are unaudited, and certain information and footnote disclosures related thereto normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America have been omitted in accordance with Rule 10-01 of Regulation S-X. In the opinion of management, the accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements were prepared following the same policies and procedures used in the preparation of the audited financial statements and reflect all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring adjustments) necessary to present fairly the financial position of Sealy Corporation and its subsidiaries (the Company). The results of operations for the interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the results for the entire fiscal year. These consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 1, 2002.
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amount of assets and liabilities and disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities at the end of the quarter and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Certain reclassifications of previously reported financial information were made to conform to the current presentation.
Note 2: Inventories
The major components of inventories were as follows:
June 1, 2003 |
December 1, 2002 | |||||
(In thousands) | ||||||
Raw materials |
$ | 26,357 | $ | 26,512 | ||
Work in process |
20,864 | 18,208 | ||||
Finished goods |
8,666 | 8,667 | ||||
$ | 55,887 | $ | 53,387 | |||
Note 3: Warranty Costs
The Company has warranty obligations in connection with the sale of its product. The warranty period for Sealy Posturepedic, Stearns & Foster, Bassett and other Sealy branded products is a 10 year non-prorated warranty service period. The costs incurred to provide for these warranty obligations are estimated and recorded as an accrued liability at the time of sale. The Company estimates its warranty cost at the point of sale based on historical rates. The change in the Companys accrued warranty obligations for the six months ended June 1, 2003 are as follows:
June 1, 2003 |
||||
(In thousands) | ||||
Accrued warranty obligations at December 1, 2002 |
$ | 9,538 | ||
Warranty claims |
(5,543 | ) | ||
2003 warranty provisions |
5,838 | |||
Accrued warranty obligations at June 1, 2003 |
$ | 9,833 | ||
6
SEALY CORPORATION
Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements(Continued)
Note 4: Business Closure
During the first quarter of 2002, the Company took control of a retail mattress company in which it had previously made investments in the form of a supply agreement and additional equity. This investment provided the Company an opportunity to determine whether the entity would be a viable distribution source for the Companys products. It is not the Companys strategy to own or control retail operations. Based on managements assessment, evaluation and consideration of alternative business strategies of the Company, it was determined that the acquired entity did not represent a valid business strategy and ceased its operations in May 2002. The Company recorded a non-cash charge of $5.8 million associated with this shut-down of the business in the quarter ended June 2, 2002.
Note 5: Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
The Company performs an annual assessment of its indefinite-lived goodwill for impairment as of the beginning of the fiscal fourth quarter. The Company also assesses its indefinite-lived goodwill and other intangible assets for impairment when events or circumstances indicate that their carrying value may not be recoverable from future cash flows.
The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for the six months ended June 1, 2003, are as follows:
Balance as of December 1, 2002 |
$ | 374.9 | |
Increase due to foreign currency translation |
6.9 | ||
Balance as of June 1, 2003 |
$ | 381.8 | |
Total other intangibles of $5.2 million (net of accumulated amortization of $14.0 million) as of June 1, 2003 primarily consist of acquired licenses, which are amortized on the straight-line method over periods ranging from 5 to 15 years.
Note 6: Other (Income) Expense
The Company previously contributed cash and other assets to Mattress Holding International LLC (MHI), a company which was controlled by the Companys largest stockholder, Bain Capital LLC, in exchange for a non-voting interest. The equity ownership of MHI was transferred to the Company in November 2002. MHI acquired a minority interest in Malachi Mattress America, Inc. (Malachi), a domestic mattress retailer, in 1999. In October 2002, MHI acquired substantially all of the remaining interest in Malachi and sold 100% of its interest to an independent third party. The Malachi investment was accounted for by MHI under the equity method. Accordingly, the Company recorded equity in the losses of Malachi of $2.9 million and $5.3 million for the three and six months ended June 2, 2002, respectively. See also Note 13.
Additionally, Other expense, net includes interest income of $0.7 million and $1.0 million for the three and six months ended June 1, 2003 and $0.4 million and $1.5 million for the three and six months ended June 2, 2002, respectively.
Other expense, net in the three and six months ended June 1, 2003 also includes a $2.0 million write-off of previously deferred derivative losses recorded in accumulated other comprehensive loss and $0.5 million of deferred debt costs associated with the early extinguishment of debt in May 2003. See also Note 7.
7
SEALY CORPORATION
Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements(Continued)
Note 7: Long-Term Obligations
In May 2003, the Company completed a private placement of $50 million of 9.875% senior subordinated notes. These notes, which are due and payable on December 15, 2007 require semi-annual interest payments, commencing June 15, 2003. The proceeds from the placement were used to prepay all quarterly principal payments on the Senior AXELs Credit Facility due through March 2004. The Company will commence quarterly principal payments on June 15, 2004. Subsequent to the issuance, the Company registered the notes with the Securities and Exchange Commission to allow them to be exchanged for publicly traded bonds. The Company commenced an exchange offer for the notes in June and expects to have it completed in July.
Note 8: Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
The FASB issued FAS 149, Amendment of Statement No. 133 on Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities. The statement is effective for contracts entered into or modified after June 30, 2003 and for hedging relationships designated after June 30, 2003. This statement amends and clarifies financial accounting and reporting for derivative instruments, including certain derivative instruments embedded in other contacts and for hedging activities. This statement amends Statement 133 for decisions made as part of the Derivatives Implementation Group process that effectively required amendments to Statement 133, in connection with other Board projects dealing with financial instruments and in connection with implementation issues raised in relation to the application of the definition of a derivative. The adoption of this Statement is not expected to have a significant impact on the Companys consolidated financial statements.
The FASB issued FAS 150, Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Characteristics of both Liabilities and Equity. This statement is effective for financial instruments entered into or modified after May 31, 2003, and otherwise is effective at the beginning of the first interim period beginning after June 15, 2003, the Companys fourth quarter of fiscal 2003. This statement establishes standards for how an issuer classifies and measures certain financial instruments with characteristics of both liabilities and equity. It requires that an issuer classify a financial instrument that is within its scope as a liability. Many of those instruments were previously classified as equity. The Company does not believe that the adoption of this Statement will have a significant impact on the Companys consolidated financial statements.
The FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 46 (FIN 46), Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities. The primary objectives of FIN 46 are to provide guidance on the identification of entities for which control is achieved through means other than through voting rights (variable interest entities or VIEs) and how to determine when and which business enterprise should consolidate the VIE (the primary beneficiary). This new model for consolidation applies to an entity in which either (1) the equity investors (if any) do not have a controlling financial interest or (2) the equity investment at risk is insufficient to finance that entitys activities without receiving additional subordinated financial support from other parties. In addition, FIN 46 requires that both the primary beneficiary and all other enterprises with a significant variable interest in a VIE make additional disclosures. The Company adopted these provisions in its second quarter of 2003. The Company is not a primary beneficiary of a VIE and does not hold any significant interests or involvement in a VIE. The adoption had no effect on the consolidated financial statements.
The Emerging Issues Task Force of the FASB released Issue 01-09, Accounting for Consideration Given by a Vendor to a Customer or a Reseller of the Vendors Product to provide guidance primarily on income statement classification of consideration from a vendor to a purchaser of the vendors products, including both customers and consumers. Generally, cash consideration is to be classified as a reduction of revenue, unless specific criteria are met regarding goods or services that the vendor may receive in return for this consideration. The Company has historically classified certain costs such as volume rebates, promotional money and
8
SEALY CORPORATION
Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements(Continued)
amortization of supply agreements covered by the provisions of EITF 01-09 as marketing and selling expenses which are recorded in selling, general and administrative in the Statement of Operations. The Company adopted EITF 01-09 effective March 4, 2002, the first day of fiscal second quarter of 2002, and reclassified previous period amounts to comply with the consensus. As a result of the adoption, both net sales and selling, general and administrative expenses were reduced $10.9 million and $22.5 million for the three and six months ended June 1, 2003 and $13.5 million and $22.7 million for the three and six months ended June 2, 2002, respectively. These changes did not affect the Companys financial position or results of operations.
Note 9: Hedging Strategies
In 2001, the Company entered into an interest rate swap agreement that effectively converted $236 million of its floating-rate debt to a fixed-rate basis through December 2006, thereby hedging against the impact of interest rate changes on future interest expense (forecasted cash flows). Use of hedging contracts allows the Company to reduce its overall exposure to interest rate changes, since gains and losses on these contracts will offset losses and gains on the transactions being hedged. The Company formally documents all hedged transactions and hedging instruments, and assesses, both at inception of the contract and on an ongoing basis, whether the hedging instruments are effective in offsetting changes in cash flows of the hedged transaction. The fair values of the interest rate agreements are estimated by obtaining quotes from brokers and are the estimated amounts that the Company would receive or pay to terminate the agreements at the reporting date, taking into consideration current interest rates and the current creditworthiness of the counterparties. Effective June 3, 2002, the Company dedesignated the interest rate swap agreement for hedge accounting. As a result of the dedesignation, $12.9 million previously recorded in accumulated other comprehensive loss as of the date of dedesignation is being amortized into interest expense over the remaining life of the interest rate swap agreement. For the three and six months ended June 1, 2003, $1.0 million and $2.0 million was amortized into interest expense, respectively. Prior to June 3, 2002, the changes in the fair market value of the interest rate swap were recorded in accumulated other comprehensive loss. Subsequent to June 3, 2002, changes in the fair market value of the interest rate swap are recorded in interest expense. For the three and six months ended June 1, 2003, $2.8 million and $7.5 million, respectively, was recorded as interest expense as a result of the change in its fair market value. At June 1, 2003 and December 1, 2002, the fair value carrying amount of this instrument was $(22.4) million and $(20.2) million, respectively, which is recorded as follows:
June 1, 2003 |
December 1, 2002 | |||||
(in millions) | ||||||
Accrued interest |
$ | 2.9 | $ | 2.1 | ||
Other accrued expenses |
11.1 | 7.6 | ||||
Other noncurrent liabilities |
8.4 | 10.5 | ||||
$ | 22.4 | $ | 20.2 | |||
During the second quarter of 2002, the Company entered into another interest rate swap agreement that has the effect of reestablishing as floating rate debt the debt previously converted to fixed rate debt through December 2006. This interest rate swap agreement has not been designated for hedge accounting and, accordingly, any changes in the fair value are to be recorded in interest expense. As a result of the change in fair market value, $2.6 million and $7.2 million was recorded as a reduction of interest expense for the three and six months ended June 1, 2003, respectively, and $0.5 million was recorded as additional interest expense for the three and six months ended June 2, 2002. At June 1, 2003 and December 1, 2002, the fair value carrying amount of this instrument was $12.1 million and $7.8 million with $9.3 million and $5.1 million recorded in prepaid expense and other current assets and $2.8 million and $2.7 million recorded in noncurrent assets, respectively.
9
SEALY CORPORATION
Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements(Continued)
At June 1, 2003 and December 1, 2002, accumulated other comprehensive loss associated with the interest rate swaps was $(5.8) million and $(10.9) million, respectively. During the second quarter of 2003, the Company wrote off $2.0 million of previously deferred derivative losses recorded in accumulated other comprehensive loss associated with the early extinguishment of debt. See Notes 6 and 7.
To protect against the reduction in value of forecasted foreign currency cash flows resulting from purchases in a foreign currency, the Company has instituted a forecasted cash flow hedging program. The Company hedges portions of its purchases denominated in foreign currencies with forward and option contracts. At June 1, 2003, the Company had forward contracts to sell a total of 25.0 million Mexican pesos and 2.1 million Canadian dollars with expiration dates ranging from July 24, 2003 to November 26, 2003, respectively and option contracts to sell a total of 3.8 million Canadian dollars with expiration dates ranging from June 4, 2003 to July 23, 2003.
Note 10: Net Income Per Common Share
The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share (in thousands) for the three and six months ended June 1, 2003 and June 2, 2002:
Three months ended |
Six months ended |
|||||||||||||||
June 1, 2003 |
June 2, 2002 |
June 1, 2003 |
June 2, 2002 |
|||||||||||||
Numerator: |
||||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) |
$ | (1,018 | ) | $ | (8,392 | ) | $ | 8,075 | $ | 54 | ||||||
Liquidation preference for common L & M shares |
5,114 | 4,640 | 10,228 | 9,280 | ||||||||||||
Net loss available to common shareholders |
$ | (6,132 | ) | $ | (13,032 | ) | $ | (2,153 | ) | $ | (9,226 | ) | ||||
Denominator: |
||||||||||||||||
Denominator for basic earnings per shareweighted average shares |
31,176 | 30,779 | 31,216 | 30,825 | ||||||||||||
Effect of dilutive securities: |
||||||||||||||||
Stock options |
* | * | * | * | ||||||||||||
Denominator for diluted earnings per shareadjusted weighted-average shares and assumed conversions |
31,176 | 30,779 | 31,216 | 30,825 | ||||||||||||
* | The dilutive securities are antidilutive for the three and six months ended June 1, 2003 and June 2, 2002. |
10
SEALY CORPORATION
Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements(Continued)
Note 11: Comprehensive Income
Total comprehensive income (loss) for the three and six months ended June 1, 2003 was $12.4 million and $25.4 million and for the three and six months ended June 2, 2002 was $(7.7) million and $0.2 million, respectively.
Activity in Stockholders Equity (Deficit) is as follows (dollar amounts in thousands):
Comprehensive Income |
Common Stock |
Additional Paid-in Capital |
Accumulated Deficit |
Treasury Stock |
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss |
Total |
|||||||||||||||||||
Balances at December 1, 2002 |
$ | 321 | $ | 146,140 | $ | (219,766 | ) | $ | (13,064 | ) | $ | (29,371 | ) | $ | (115,740 | ) | |||||||||
Comprehensive income (loss): |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income for the six months ended June 1, 2003 |
$ | 8,075 | | | 8,075 | | | 8,075 | |||||||||||||||||
Exercise of stock options |
| 2 | 85 | | | | 87 | ||||||||||||||||||
Amortization of dedesignated cash flow hedge |
2,018 | | | | | 2,018 | 2,018 | ||||||||||||||||||
Write-off of dedesignated cash flow hedge associated with early extinguishment of debt |
2,010 | | | | | 2,010 | 2,010 | ||||||||||||||||||
Foreign currency translation adjustment |
13,314 | | | | | 13,314 | 13,314 | ||||||||||||||||||
Balances at June 1, 2003 |
$ | 25,417 | $ | 323 | $ | 146,225 | $ | (211,691 | ) | $ | (13,064 | ) | $ | (12,029 | ) | $ | (90,236 | ) | |||||||
Note 12: Contingencies
The Company is subject to legal proceedings, claims, and litigation arising in the ordinary course of business. While the outcome of these matters is currently not determinable, management does not expect that the ultimate costs to resolve these matters will have a material adverse effect on the Companys consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
The Company is currently conducting an environmental cleanup at a formerly owned facility in South Brunswick, New Jersey pursuant to the New Jersey Industrial Site Recovery Act. The Company and one of its subsidiaries are parties to an Administrative Consent Order issued by the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection. Pursuant to that order, the Company and its subsidiary agreed to conduct soil and groundwater remediation at the property. The Company does not believe that its manufacturing processes were the source of contamination. The Company sold the property in 1997. The Company and its subsidiary retained primary responsibility for the required remediation. The Company has completed essentially all soil remediation with the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection approval, and has concluded a pilot test of the groundwater remediation system. The Company is working with the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection to develop a remediation plan for the sediment in Oakeys Brook adjoining the site.
The Company is also remediating soil and groundwater contamination at an inactive facility located in Oakville, Connecticut. Although the Company is conducting the remediation voluntarily, it obtained Connecticut Department of Environmental Protection approval of the remediation plan. The Company has completed
11
SEALY CORPORATION
Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements(Continued)
essentially all soil remediation under the remediation plan and is currently monitoring groundwater at the site. The Company believes the contamination is attributable to the manufacturing operations of previous unaffiliated occupants of the facility.
The Company removed three underground storage tanks previously used for diesel, gasoline, and waste oil from its South Gate, California facility in March 1994 and remediated the soil in the area. Since August 1998, the Company has been working with the California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Los Angeles Region to monitor ground water at the site.
While the Company cannot predict the ultimate timing or costs of the South Brunswick, Oakville, and South Gate environmental matters, based on facts currently known, the Company believes that the accruals recorded are adequate and does not believe the resolution of these matters will have a material adverse effect on the financial position or future operations of the Company; however, in the event of an adverse decision, these matters could have a material adverse effect.
Note 13: Related Party Transactions
The Company previously contributed cash and other assets to Mattress Holdings International LLC (MHI), a company which was controlled by the Companys largest stockholder, Bain Capital LLC, in exchange for a non-voting interest. MHI was formed to invest in domestic and international loans, advances and investments in joint ventures, licensees and retailers. The equity ownership of MHI was transferred from Bain to the Company in November 2002. In 1999, MHI acquired a minority interest in Malachi Mattress America, Inc. (Malachi), a domestic mattress retailer, and indirectly through a Bain controlled holding company acquired a minority interest in Mattress Holdings Corporation (MHC). MHC owns an interest in Mattress Discounters Corporation, a domestic mattress retailer and sold all of its equity interest in an international bedding retailer, previously an affiliate of Sealy, on April 15, 2003.
In October 2002, Mattress Discounters Corporation filed a voluntary joint petition with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Maryland for reorganization under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code and was operating as a debtor in possession under the Bankruptcy Code. Effective March 14, 2003, Mattress Discounters emerged from bankruptcy. At the time Mattress Discounters filed for bankruptcy protection, the Company had recorded in its financial statements a $12.5 million participation in Mattress Discounters banking facility and $16.0 million in trade receivables. The Company had fully-reserved the trade receivables. As part of the approved bankruptcy settlement, the Company received a non-controlling minority interest in Mattress Discounters and a $12.9 million secured note, guaranteed by MHC. Other entities affiliated with Bain Capital LLC also received a minority interest in Mattress Discounters. During the bankruptcy period, Mattress Discounters exited four markets. The majority of the stores in the exited markets were acquired by other current Sealy customers. The Company and Mattress Discounters also amended the existing long-term supply agreement to remove a requirement for Sealy to be Mattress Discounters exclusive supplier. The Company does not believe that any sales reductions, as a result of the amended supply agreement or the markets exited, will have a material adverse effect on the Company. The Company had sales to Mattress Discounters of $6.9 million and $15.0 million for the three and six months ended June 1, 2003 and $20.9 million and $38.7 million for the three and six months ended June 2, 2002, respectively, which are shown in the statement of operations as sales to affiliates. Concurrent with the previously mentioned sale of the international bedding retailer by MHC, Sealy consummated the sale to MHC of the $12.9 million note and the equity interest that Sealy received in the Mattress Discounters bankruptcy, as well as MHIs equity interest in MHC for $13.6 million. As a result of these transactions, the Company no longer has any direct interest in Mattress Discounters other than trade receivables in the normal course of business.
12
SEALY CORPORATION
Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements(Continued)
In October 2002, MHI acquired substantially all of the remaining interest in Malachi. Concurrent with the acquisition, MHI sold 100% of its interest in Malachi to an independent third party, canceled $21.7 million in trade receivables, all of which were fully reserved, received a $17.5 million long-term note with an estimated fair value of $8.8 million, due and payable in 2009, and Malachis name was changed to Mattress Firm, Inc (MFI). MHI also loaned Mattress Firm, Inc. $3.3 million secured by all of its assets. Both the note and the loan are recorded in Long-term notes receivable in the balance sheet. The Companys net exposure (including trade receivables) at June 1, 2003 and December 1, 2002 was $20.9 million and $19.5 million, respectively. The Company believes that the operating performance of Mattress Firm, Inc. has improved in 2003 compared to 2002. In addition, the current owners, at the time of the transaction, made additional cash infusions in the business which improved its overall capital structure. The Company has been receiving timely payments on its outstanding receivables assumed by MFI. Based on this, the Company believes that it has adequate reserves against its current exposure. The Company will, however, continue to monitor this business to determine whether reserve levels are appropriate. Concurrent with the transactions, the Company entered into a new long-term, non-exclusive supply agreement with Mattress Firm, Inc. through November 1, 2008 which replaced an exclusive supply agreement. The Company does not expect that any sales reduction as a result of the amended supply agreement will have a material adverse effect on the Company. As a result of the transactions previously described, MFI is no longer an affiliate of Bain Capital LLC or Sealy and sales since the date of the transactions are shown in the statement of operations as sales to non-affiliates. The Company also had sales to Malachi of $16.2 million and $34.0 million for the three and six months ended June 2, 2002 which is included in the statement of operations as sales to affiliates.
As previously mentioned, MHC sold its interest in an international bedding retailer on April 15, 2003. Consequently, this retailer is no longer an affiliate of Sealy. Prior to the transaction, sales to this retailer were included in sales to affiliates in the statement of operations. Such affiliate sales were $1.3 million and $4.0 million for the three and six months ended June 1, 2003 and $2.5 million and $5.5 million for the three and six months ended June 2, 2002, respectively. Sales to this retailer after April 15, 2003 have been included in sales to non-affiliates in the statement of operations.
The Company believes that the terms on which mattresses were supplied to these affiliates were not materially more or less favorable than those that might reasonably be obtained in a comparable transaction on an arms length basis from a person that is not an affiliate or related party.
Note 14: Stock Option and Restricted Stock Plans
As permitted by FAS 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, the Company continues to account for its stock option and stock incentive plans in accordance with Accounting Principles Board (APB) Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, and makes no charges (except to the extent required by APB Opinion No. 25) against earnings with respect to options granted. FAS No. 148, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation-Transition and Disclosure an Amendment of FASB Statement No. 123 does however require interim disclosure of pro forma information regarding net income and earnings per share determined as if the Company had accounted for its stock options under the fair value method.
For purposes of this pro forma disclosure, the estimated fair value of the options is amortized as an expense over the options vesting period. The Company recognized no compensation expense for the three and six months ended June 1, 2003 and June 2, 2002 as all options were granted at or above the fair market value of the stock at the date of grant.
13
Three months ended |
Six months ended |
||||||||||||||
June 1, 2003 |
June 2, 2002 |
June 1, 2003 |
June 2, 2002 |
||||||||||||
(In thousands, except per share data) | |||||||||||||||
Net income (loss), as reported |
$ | (1,018 | ) | $ | (8,392 | ) | $ | 8,075 | $ | 54 | |||||
Deduct: Total stock-based employee compensation expense determined under fair value based method for all awards, net of tax |
145 | 149 | 290 | 298 | |||||||||||
Pro forma net income (loss) |
$ | (1,163 | ) | $ | (8,541 | ) | $ | 7,785 | $ | (244 | ) | ||||
Earnings per share: |
|||||||||||||||
Basicas reported |
$ | (0.03 | ) | $ | (0.27 | ) | $ | 0.26 | $ | | |||||
Basicpro forma |
(0.04 | ) | (0.28 | ) | 0.25 | (0.01 | ) | ||||||||
Dilutedas reported |
(0.03 | ) | (0.27 | ) | 0.26 | | |||||||||
Dilutedpro forma |
(0.04 | ) | (0.28 | ) | 0.25 | (0.01 | ) |
Note 15: Segment Information
The Company operates predominately in one industry segment, that being the manufacture and marketing of conventional bedding.
Note 16: Guarantor/Non-Guarantor Financial Information
The Parent and each of the Guarantor Subsidiaries has fully and unconditionally guaranteed, on a joint and several basis, the obligation to pay principal and interest with respect to the Senior Subordinated and Senior Subordinated Discount Notes (collectively, the Notes) of Sealy Mattress Company (the Issuer). Substantially all of the Issuers operating income and cash flow is generated by its subsidiaries. As a result, funds necessary to meet the Issuers debt service obligations are provided in part by distributions or advances from its subsidiaries. Under certain circumstances, contractual and legal restrictions, as well as the financial condition and operating requirements of the Issuers subsidiaries, could limit the Issuers ability to obtain cash from its subsidiaries for the purpose of meeting its debt service obligations, including the payment of principal and interest on the Notes. Although holders of the Notes will be direct creditors of the Issuers principal direct subsidiaries by virtue of the guarantees, the Issuer has subsidiaries (Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries) that are not included among the Guarantor Subsidiaries, and such subsidiaries will not be obligated with respect to the Notes. As a result, the claims of creditors of the Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries will effectively have priority with respect to the assets and earnings of such companies over the claims of creditors of the Issuer, including the holders of the Notes.
The following supplemental consolidating condensed financial statements present:
1. | Consolidating condensed balance sheets as of June 1, 2003 and December 1, 2002 and consolidating condensed statements of operations for the three months ended June 1, 2003 and June 2, 2002 and the consolidating condensed statements of operations and cash flows for the six months ended June 1, 2003 and June 2, 2002. |
2 | Sealy Corporation (the Parent and a guarantor), Sealy Mattress Company (the Issuer), combined Guarantor Subsidiaries and combined Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries with their investments in subsidiaries accounted for using the equity method. |
3. | Elimination entries necessary to consolidate the Parent and all of its subsidiaries. |
Separate financial statements of each of the Guarantor Subsidiaries are not presented because Management believes that these financial statements would not be material to investors.
14
SEALY CORPORATION
Supplemental Consolidating Condensed Balance Sheet
June 1, 2003
(in thousands)
Sealy Corporation |
Sealy Mattress Company |
Combined Guarantor Subsidiaries |
Combined Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries |
Eliminations |
Consolidated |
|||||||||||||||||||
ASSETS |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Current assets: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | | $ | 31 | $ | 31,594 | $ | 3,617 | $ | | $ | 35,242 | ||||||||||||
Accounts receivableNon-affiliates, net |
13 | (15 | ) | 124,598 | 54,818 | | 179,414 | |||||||||||||||||
Accounts receivableAffiliates, net |
| | 4,268 | | | 4,268 | ||||||||||||||||||
Inventories |
| 1,685 | 34,865 | 19,337 | | 55,887 | ||||||||||||||||||
Prepaid expenses, deferred taxes and other current assets |
(97 | ) | 9,769 | 26,501 | 11,604 | | 47,777 | |||||||||||||||||
(84 | ) | 11,470 | 221,826 | 89,376 | | 322,588 | ||||||||||||||||||
Property, plant and equipment, at cost |
| 6,264 | 227,367 | 60,433 | | 294,064 | ||||||||||||||||||
Less: accumulated depreciation |
| (3,183 | ) | (103,211 | ) | (11,871 | ) | | (118,265 | ) | ||||||||||||||
| 3,081 | 124,156 | 48,562 | | 175,799 | |||||||||||||||||||
Other assets: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Goodwill |
| 14,816 | 314,698 | 52,299 | | 381,813 | ||||||||||||||||||
Other intangibles, net |
| | 3,545 | 1,637 | | 5,182 | ||||||||||||||||||
Net investment in and advances to (from) subsidiaries |
(35,946 | ) | 603,272 | (353,044 | ) | (91,197 | ) | (123,085 | ) | | ||||||||||||||
Long-term notes receivable |
| | | 12,022 | | 12,022 | ||||||||||||||||||
Debt issuance costs, net and other assets |
107 | 21,579 | 8,176 | 2,465 | | 32,327 | ||||||||||||||||||
(35,839 | ) | 639,667 | (26,625 | ) | (22,774 | ) | (123,085 | ) | 431,344 | |||||||||||||||
Total assets |
$ | (35,923 | ) | $ | 654,218 | $ | 319,357 | $ | 115,164 | $ | (123,085 | ) | $ | 929,731 | ||||||||||
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY (DEFICIT) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Current liabilities: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Current portion of long-term obligations |
$ | | $ | | $ | 9 | $ | 5,403 | $ | | $ | 5,412 | ||||||||||||
Accounts payable |
| 555 | 44,054 | 33,895 | | 78,504 | ||||||||||||||||||
Accrued interest |
| 1,147 | 21,489 | 488 | | 23,124 | ||||||||||||||||||
Accrued incentives and advertising |
| 1,584 | 30,426 | 5,308 | | 37,318 | ||||||||||||||||||
Accrued compensation |
| 145 | 11,621 | 5,254 | | 17,020 | ||||||||||||||||||
Other accrued expenses |
111 | 12,492 | 23,822 | 6,614 | | 43,039 | ||||||||||||||||||
111 | 15,923 | 131,421 | 56,962 | | 204,417 | |||||||||||||||||||
Long-term obligations, net |
48,002 | 690,331 | 63 | 6,900 | | 745,296 | ||||||||||||||||||
Other noncurrent liabilities |
6,678 | 8,420 | 26,920 | 5,586 | | 47,604 | ||||||||||||||||||
Deferred income taxes |
(478 | ) | 679 | 13,575 | 8,874 | | 22,650 | |||||||||||||||||
Stockholders equity (deficit) |
(90,236 | ) | (61,135 | ) | 147,378 | 36,842 | (123,085 | ) | (90,236 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Total liabilities and stockholders equity (deficit) |
$ | (35,923 | ) | $ | 654,218 | $ | 319,357 | $ | 115,164 | $ | (123,085 | ) | $ | 929,731 | ||||||||||
15
SEALY CORPORATION
Supplemental Consolidating Condensed Balance Sheet
December 1, 2002
(in thousands)
Sealy Corporation |
Sealy Mattress Company |
Combined Guarantor Subsidiaries |
Consolidated Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries |
Eliminations |
Consolidated |
|||||||||||||||||||
ASSETS |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Current assets: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | | $ | 28 | $ | 21,881 | $ | 5,534 | $ | | $ | 27,443 | ||||||||||||
Accounts receivableNon-affiliates, net |
11 | 16 | 115,141 | 49,574 | | 164,742 | ||||||||||||||||||
Accounts receivableAffiliates, net |
| | 420 | 3,333 | | 3,753 | ||||||||||||||||||
Inventories |
| 1,501 | 36,377 | 15,509 | | 53,387 | ||||||||||||||||||
Prepaid expenses, deferred taxes and other current assets |
(97 | ) | 5,557 | 29,490 | 7,748 | | 42,698 | |||||||||||||||||
(86 | ) | 7,102 | 203,309 | 81,698 | | 292,023 | ||||||||||||||||||
Property, plant and equipment, at cost |
| 5,398 | 223,526 | 51,702 | | 280,626 | ||||||||||||||||||
Less accumulated depreciation |
| (2,517 | ) | (95,568 | ) | (8,616 | ) | | (106,701 | ) | ||||||||||||||
| 2,881 | 127,958 | 43,086 | | 173,925 | |||||||||||||||||||
Other assets: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Goodwill |
| 14,816 | 314,698 | 45,432 | | 374,946 | ||||||||||||||||||
Other intangibles, net |
| 3,689 | 1,389 | | 5,078 | |||||||||||||||||||
Net investment in and advances to (from) subsidiaries |
(65,254 | ) | 590,852 | (359,727 | ) | (110,986 | ) | (54,885 | ) | | ||||||||||||||
Investment in and advances to affiliates |
| | | 12,950 | | 12,950 | ||||||||||||||||||
Long-term notes receivable |
| | | 12,022 | | 12,022 | ||||||||||||||||||
Debt issuance costs, net and other assets |
106 | 22,318 | 8,954 | 2,626 | | 34,004 | ||||||||||||||||||
(65,148 | ) | 627,986 | (32,386 | ) | (36,567 | ) | (54,885 | ) | 439,000 | |||||||||||||||
Total assets |
$ | (65,234 | ) | $ | 637,969 | $ | 298,881 | $ | 88,217 | $ | (54,885 | ) | $ | 904,948 | ||||||||||
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS (DEFICIT) EQUITY |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Current liabilities: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Current portion of long-term obligations |
$ | | $ | 29,437 | $ | | $ | 3,901 | $ | | $ | 33,338 | ||||||||||||
Accounts payable |
| 229 | 38,481 | 30,380 | | 69,090 | ||||||||||||||||||
Accrued interest |
| 1,764 | 12,246 | 253 | | 14,263 | ||||||||||||||||||
Accrued incentives and advertising |
| 1,059 | 35,468 | 5,003 | | 41,530 | ||||||||||||||||||
Accrued compensation |
| 144 | 19,589 | 4,749 | | 24,482 | ||||||||||||||||||
Other accrued expenses |
51 | 10,224 | 25,238 | 7,984 | | 43,497 | ||||||||||||||||||
51 | 42,857 | 131,022 | 52,270 | | 226,200 | |||||||||||||||||||
Long-term obligations, net |
45,246 | 672,340 | 63 | 2,247 | | 719,896 | ||||||||||||||||||
Other noncurrent liabilities |
5,687 | 10,442 | 25,593 | 5,083 | | 46,805 | ||||||||||||||||||
Deferred income taxes |
(478 | ) | 679 | 19,582 | 8,004 | | 27,787 | |||||||||||||||||
Stockholders (deficit) equity |
(115,740 | ) | (88,349 | ) | 122,621 | 20,613 | (54,885 | ) | (115,740 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Total liabilities and stockholders (deficit) equity |
$ | (65,234 | ) | $ | 637,969 | $ | 298,881 | $ | 88,217 | $ | (54,885 | ) | $ | 904,948 | ||||||||||
16
SEALY CORPORATION
Supplemental Consolidated Condensed Statements of Operations
Three Months Ended June 1, 2003
(in thousands)
Sealy Corporation |
Sealy Mattress Company |
Combined Guarantor Subsidiaries |
Combined Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries |
Eliminations |
Consolidated |
|||||||||||||||||||
Net salesNon-affiliates |
$ | | $ | 11,985 | $ | 231,199 | $ | 53,477 | $ | (35,042 | ) | $ | 261,619 | |||||||||||
Net salesAffiliates |
| | 6,873 | 1,284 | | 8,157 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total net sales |
| 11,985 | 238,072 | 54,761 | (35,042 | ) | 269,776 | |||||||||||||||||
Costs and expenses: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cost of goods sold |
| 8,295 | 149,522 | 34,294 | (35,042 | ) | 157,069 | |||||||||||||||||
Cost of goods sold Affiliates |
| | 4,027 | 854 | | 4,881 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total cost of goods sold |
| 8,295 | 153,549 | 35,148 | (35,042 | ) | 161,950 | |||||||||||||||||
Gross profit |
| 3,690 | 84,523 | 19,613 | | 107,826 | ||||||||||||||||||
Selling, general and administrative |
37 | 3,538 | 72,676 | 16,465 | | 92,716 | ||||||||||||||||||
Stock based compensation |
450 | | | | | 450 | ||||||||||||||||||
Amortization of intangibles |
| 73 | 200 | | 273 | |||||||||||||||||||
Royalty income, net |
| | (3,092 | ) | 244 | | (2,848 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Income from operations |
(487 | ) | 152 | 14,866 | 2,704 | | 17,235 | |||||||||||||||||
Interest expense |
1,452 | 14,989 | (16 | ) | 450 | | 16,875 | |||||||||||||||||
Other (income) expense, net |
| 2,531 | (108 | ) | (626 | ) | | 1,797 | ||||||||||||||||
Loss (income) from equity investees |
761 | (1,490 | ) | | | 729 | | |||||||||||||||||
Loss (income) from nonguarantor equity investees |
| 412 | (1,553 | ) | | 1,141 | | |||||||||||||||||
Capital charge and intercompany interest allocation |
(1,489 | ) | (14,192 | ) | 14,787 | 894 | | | ||||||||||||||||
Income (loss) before income taxes |
(1,211 | ) | (2,098 | ) | 1,756 | 1,986 | (1,870 | ) | (1,437 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Income tax (benefit) expense |
(193 | ) | (1,337 | ) | 266 | 845 | | (419 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) |
$ | (1,018 | ) | $ | (761 | ) | $ | 1,490 | $ | 1,141 | $ | (1,870 | ) | $ | (1,018 | ) | ||||||||
17
SEALY CORPORATION
Supplemental Consolidated Condensed Statements of Operations Three Months Ended June 2, 2002
(in thousands)
Sealy Corporation |
Sealy Mattress Company |
Combined Guarantor Subsidiaries |
Combined Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries |
Eliminations |
Consolidated |
|||||||||||||||||||
Net salesNon-affiliates |
$ | | $ | 12,006 | $ | 203,857 | $ | 46,740 | $ | (2,469 | ) | $ | 260,134 | |||||||||||
Net salesAffiliates |
| | 37,133 | 2,488 | | 39,621 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total net sales |
| 12,006 | 240,990 | 49,228 | (2,469 | ) | 299,755 | |||||||||||||||||
Costs and expenses: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cost of goods sold |
| 8,040 | 111,897 | 29,680 | (2,469 | ) | 147,148 | |||||||||||||||||
Cost of goods sold Affiliates |
| | 21,471 | 1,643 | | 23,114 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total cost of goods sold |
| 8,040 | 133,368 | 31,323 | (2,469 | ) | 170,262 | |||||||||||||||||
Gross profit |
| 3,966 | 107,622 | 17,905 | | 129,493 | ||||||||||||||||||
Selling, general and administrative |
45 | 2,913 | 95,363 | 21,350 | | 119,671 | ||||||||||||||||||
Stock based compensation |
654 | | | | | 654 | ||||||||||||||||||
Business closure charge |
| | | 5,802 | | 5,802 | ||||||||||||||||||
Amortization of intangibles |
| 72 | 23 | | 95 | |||||||||||||||||||
Royalty income, net |
| | (3,330 | ) | 219 | | (3,111 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Income from operations |
(699 | ) | 1,053 | 15,517 | (9,489 | ) | | 6,382 | ||||||||||||||||
Interest expense |
1,430 | 16,109 | 285 | 412 | | 18,236 | ||||||||||||||||||
Other (income) expense |
(2 | ) | | (189 | ) | 2,561 | | 2,370 | ||||||||||||||||
Loss (income) from equity investees |
8,181 | 16,803 | | | (24,984 | ) | | |||||||||||||||||
Loss (income) from nonguarantor equity investees |
| (8,677 | ) | 14,632 | | (5,955 | ) | | ||||||||||||||||
Capital charge and intercompany interest allocation |
(1,473 | ) | (15,033 | ) | 15,574 | 932 | | | ||||||||||||||||
Income (loss) before income taxes |
(8,835 | ) | (8,149 | ) | (14,785 | ) | (13,394 | ) | 30,939 | (14,224 | ) | |||||||||||||
Income tax expense (benefit) |
(443 | ) | 32 | 2,018 | (7,439 | ) | | (5,832 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) |
$ | (8,392 | ) | $ | (8,181 | ) | $ | (16,803 | ) | $ | (5,955 | ) | $ | 30,939 | $ | (8,392 | ) | |||||||
18
SEALY CORPORATION
Supplemental Consolidating Condensed Statements of Operations Six Months Ended June 1, 2003
(in thousands)
Sealy Corporation |
Sealy Mattress Company |
Combined Guarantor Subsidiaries |
Combined Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries |
Eliminations |
Consolidated |
|||||||||||||||||||
Net salesNon-affiliates |
$ | | $ | 26,034 | $ | 481,234 | $ | 103,816 | $ | (72,062 | ) | $ | 539,022 | |||||||||||
Net salesAffiliates |
| | 15,021 | 4,044 | | 19,065 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total net sales |
| 26,034 | 496,255 | 107,860 | (72,062 | ) | 558,087 | |||||||||||||||||
Costs and expenses: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cost of goods sold |
| 18,047 | 304,408 | 65,628 | (72,062 | ) | 316,021 | |||||||||||||||||
Cost of goods sold Affiliates |
| | 8,622 | 2,662 | | 11,284 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total cost of goods sold |
| 18,047 | 313,030 | 68,290 | (72,062 | ) | 327,305 | |||||||||||||||||
Gross profit |
| 7,987 | 183,225 | 39,570 | | 230,782 | ||||||||||||||||||
Selling, general and administrative |
75 | 7,767 | 144,283 | 33,248 | | 185,373 | ||||||||||||||||||
Stock based compensation |
990 | | | | | 990 | ||||||||||||||||||
Amortization of intangibles |
| | 145 | 388 | | 533 | ||||||||||||||||||
Royalty income, net |
| | (6,026 | ) | 465 | | (5,561 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Income from operations |
(1,065 | ) | 220 | 44,823 | 5,469 | | 49,447 | |||||||||||||||||
Interest expense |
2,863 | 30,325 | 4 | 760 | | 33,952 | ||||||||||||||||||
Other (income) expense |
(1 | ) | 2,531 | (219 | ) | (810 | ) | | 1,501 | |||||||||||||||
Loss (income) from equity investees |
(8,650 | ) | (11,444 | ) | | | 20,094 | | ||||||||||||||||
Loss (income) from nonguarantor equity investees |
| 512 | (2,646 | ) | | 2,134 | | |||||||||||||||||
Capital charge and intercompany interest allocation |
(2,938 | ) | (28,711 | ) | 29,800 | 1,849 | | | ||||||||||||||||
Income (loss) before income taxes |
7,661 | 7,007 | 17,884 | 3,670 | (22,228 | ) | 13,994 | |||||||||||||||||
Income tax (benefit) expense |
(414 | ) | (1,643 | ) | 6,440 | 1,536 | | 5,919 | ||||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) |
$ | 8,075 | $ | 8,650 | $ | 11,444 | $ | 2,134 | $ | (22,228 | ) | $ | 8,075 | |||||||||||
19
SEALY CORPORATION
Supplemental Consolidating Condensed Statements of Operations Six Months Ended June 2, 2002
(in thousands)
Sealy Corporation |
Sealy Mattress Company |
Combined Guarantor Subsidiaries |
Combined Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries |
Eliminations |
Consolidated |
|||||||||||||||||||
Net salesNon-affiliates |
$ | | $ | 23,774 | $ | 401,226 | $ | 93,216 | $ | (4,898 | ) | $ | 513,318 | |||||||||||
Net salesAffiliates |
| | 72,658 | 5,552 | | 78,210 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total net sales |
| 23,774 | 473,884 | 98,768 | (4,898 | ) | 591,528 | |||||||||||||||||
Costs and expenses: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cost of goods sold |
| 15,664 | 223,088 | 59,130 | (4,898 | ) | 292,984 | |||||||||||||||||
Cost of goods sold Affiliates |
| | 38,481 | 3,807 | | 42,288 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total cost of goods sold |
| 15,664 | 261,569 | 62,937 | (4,898 | ) | 335,272 | |||||||||||||||||
Gross profit |
| 8,110 | 212,315 | 35,831 | | 256,256 | ||||||||||||||||||
Selling, general and administrative |
90 | 5,622 | 171,823 | 35,822 | | 213,357 | ||||||||||||||||||
Stock based compensation |
1,228 | | | | | 1,228 | ||||||||||||||||||
Business closure charge |
| | | 5,802 | | 5,802 | ||||||||||||||||||
Amortization of intangibles |
| | 144 | 124 | | 268 | ||||||||||||||||||
Royalty income, net |
| | (5,987 | ) | 389 | | (5,598 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Income from operations |
(1,318 | ) | 2,488 | 46,335 | (6,306 | ) | | 41,199 | ||||||||||||||||
Interest expense |
2,700 | 33,596 | 303 | 893 | | 37,492 | ||||||||||||||||||
Other (income) expense |
(2 | ) | | (990 | ) | 4,578 | | 3,586 | ||||||||||||||||
Loss (income) from equity investees |
(603 | ) | 9,141 | | | (8,538 | ) | | ||||||||||||||||
Loss (income) from nonguarantor equity investees |
| (9,616 | ) | 15,704 | | (6,088 | ) | | ||||||||||||||||
Capital charge and intercompany interest allocation |
(2,788 | ) | (31,395 | ) | 32,341 | 1,842 | | | ||||||||||||||||
Income (loss) before income taxes |
(625 | ) | 762 | (1,023 | ) | (13,619 | ) | 14,626 | 121 | |||||||||||||||
Income tax (benefit) expense |
(679 | ) | 159 | 8,118 | (7,531 | ) | | 67 | ||||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) |
$ | 54 | $ | 603 | $ | (9,141 | ) | $ | (6,088 | ) | $ | 14,626 | $ | 54 | ||||||||||
20
SEALY CORPORATION
Supplemental Consolidating Condensed Statements of Cash Flows Six Months Ended June 1, 2003
(in thousands)
Sealy Corporation |
Sealy Mattress Company |
Combined Guarantor Subsidiaries |
Combined Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries |
Eliminations |
Consolidated |
||||||||||||||||||
Net cash operating activities |
$ | | $ | 55 | $ | 8,379 | $ | 727 | $ | | $ | 9,161 | |||||||||||
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Purchase of property, plant and equipment, net |
| (171 | ) | (5,340 | ) | (398 | ) | | (5,909 | ) | |||||||||||||
Cash received from affiliate note and investment |
| | | 13,611 | | 13,611 | |||||||||||||||||
Net activity in investment in and advances to (from) subsidiaries |
(87 | ) | 15,435 | 6,665 | (22,013 | ) | | | |||||||||||||||
Net proceeds provided by (used in) investing activities |
(87 | ) | 15,264 | 1,325 | (8,800 | ) | | 7,702 | |||||||||||||||
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Proceeds from issuance of long-term obligations |
| 51,500 | | | | 51,500 | |||||||||||||||||
Prepayment of Tranche debt |
| (49,000 | ) | | | | (49,000 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Repayment of long-term obligations, net |
| (14,336 | ) | 9 | 6,156 | | (8,171 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Equity issuances |
87 | | | | | 87 | |||||||||||||||||
Debt issuance costs |
| (3,480 | ) | | | | (3,480 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Net cash (used in) financing activities |
87 | (15,316 | ) | 9 | 6,156 | | (9,064 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Change in cash and cash equivalents |
| 3 | 9,713 | (1,917 | ) | | 7,799 | ||||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents: |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Beginning of period |
| 28 | 21,881 | 5,534 | | 27,443 | |||||||||||||||||
End of period |
$ | | $ | 31 | $ | 31,594 | $ | 3,617 | $ | | $ | 35,242 | |||||||||||
21
SEALY CORPORATION
Supplemental Consolidating Condensed Statements of Cash Flows Six Months Ended June 2, 2002
(in thousands)
Sealy Corporation |
Sealy Mattress Company |
Combined Guarantor Subsidiaries |
Combined Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries |
Eliminations |
Consolidated |
||||||||||||||||||
Net cash operating activities |
$ | | $ | 1,046 | $ | 38,014 | $ | 9,809 | $ | | $ | 48,869 | |||||||||||
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Purchase of property, plant and equipment, net |
| (96 | ) | (6,875 | ) | (743 | ) | | (7,714 | ) | |||||||||||||
Purchase of businesses, net of cash acquired |
| | | (1,390 | ) | | (1,390 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Advances to affiliate |
| | | (12,500 | ) | | (12,500 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Net activity in investment in and advances to (from) subsidiaries |
373 | 408 | (4,896 | ) | 4,115 | | | ||||||||||||||||
Net proceeds provided by (used in) investing activities |
373 | 312 | (11,771 | ) | (10,518 | ) | | (21,604 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Treasury stock repurchase, including direct expenses |
(801 | ) | | | | | (801 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Repayment of long-term obligations, net |
| (758 | ) | (48 | ) | (577 | ) | | (1,383 | ) | |||||||||||||
Equity issuances |
428 | | | | | 428 | |||||||||||||||||
Purchase of interest rate cap |
| (625 | ) | | | | (625 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Net cash (used in) financing activities |
(373 | ) | (1,383 | ) | (48 | ) | (577 | ) | | (2,381 | ) | ||||||||||||
Change in cash and cash equivalents |
| (25 | ) | 26,195 | (1,286 | ) | | 24,884 | |||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents: |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Beginning of period |
| 55 | 6,442 | 5,513 | | 12,010 | |||||||||||||||||
End of period |
$ | | $ | 30 | $ | 32,637 | $ | 4,227 | $ | | $ | 36,894 | |||||||||||
22
SEALY CORPORATION
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Quarter Ended June 1, 2003 compared with Quarter Ended June 2, 2002
Net Sales. Net sales for the quarter ended June 1, 2003, were $269.8 million, a decrease of $30.0 million, or 10.0% from the quarter ended June 2, 2002. Total domestic sales were $213.8 million for the second quarter of 2003 compared to $248.4 million for the second quarter of 2002. Domestic sales decline of $34.6 million was attributable to a 14.0% decrease in volume. This unit volume decrease was primarily due to a $9.7 million decrease in floor sample shipments in 2003 as the Company was providing floor samples for the new Stearns & Foster roll-out in 2002, lower sales from affiliates and prior affiliates as they transition to multivendor retailers and general economic softness. For the quarter ended June 1, 2003, sales to affiliates included sales to one affiliate for the entire quarter and sales to a prior affiliate for approximately one half of the quarter. Affiliate sales for the quarter ended June 2, 2002 included sales to three affiliates. Total international sales were $56.0 million for the second quarter of 2003 compared to $51.4 for the second quarter of 2002. Growth of $5.0 million in the international operations was primarily attributable to sales growth in the European, Argentine and Brazilian markets.
Cost of Goods Sold. Cost of goods sold for the quarter, as a percentage of net sales, increased 3.2 percentage points to 60.0%. Cost of goods sold for the domestic business, as a percentage of net sales, increased 3.5 percentage points to 58.9%. This increase is primarily due to lower absorption of fixed costs due to lower unit sales, higher variable costs associated with increased workers compensation and health insurance costs, higher material costs and a lower mix of higher-end products that typically carry a higher margin than other products. Cost of goods sold for the international business, as a percentage of net sales, increased 0.6 percentage points to 64.5%. This increase is primarily due to higher labor and fringe benefit costs in the European operations and higher material costs in Brazil, partially offset by lower material costs in the Canadian and European businesses.
Selling, General, and Administrative. Selling, general, and administrative expenses decreased $27.0 million to $92.7 million, or 34.4% of net sales, compared to $119.7 million, or 39.9% of net sales. This decrease is primarily due to a $17.9 decrease in bad debt expense as the Company recorded specific bad debt charges in the second quarter of 2002 primarily associated with affiliated customers. The Company also had decreased promotional and advertising costs, partially offset by higher corporate overhead expenses.
Stock Based Compensation. The Company has an obligation to repurchase certain securities of the Company held by an officer at the greater of estimated fair market value or original cost. The Company recorded a $0.5 million and a $0.7 million charge during the quarters ended June 1, 2003 and June 2, 2002, respectively, to revalue this obligation to reflect an increase in the fair market value of the securities.
Interest Expense. Interest expense decreased $1.4 million primarily due to lower average debt levels and lower effective interest rates. In 2001, the Company entered into an interest rate swap agreement that effectively converted $236 million of its floating-rate debt to a fixed-rate basis through December 2006. In the second quarter of 2002, the Company entered into another interest rate swap agreement that has the effect of reestablishing as floating rate debt the debt previously converted to fixed rate debt through December 2006. The Company is required under its credit agreements to hedge at least 50% of its floating rate term debt.
Income Tax. The Companys effective income tax rates in 2003 and 2002 differ from the Federal statutory rate principally because of the effect of certain foreign tax rate differentials, state and local income taxes and operating losses in 2002 from a prior equity investee for which no tax benefit had been recorded. The Companys effective tax rate for the quarter ended June 1, 2003 is approximately (29.2)% compared to (41.0)% for quarter ended June 2, 2002. The Companys effective tax rate for the second quarter of 2003 was also impacted by a higher projected effective tax rate for the full fiscal year as compared to the end of the first quarter of 2003. This resulted in a lower tax benefit as compared to the effective rate for the six months ended June 1, 2003.
23
Six Months Ended June 1, 2003 compared with Six Months Ended June 2, 2002
Net Sales. Net sales for the six months ended June 1, 2003, were $558.1 million, a decrease of $33.4 million, or 5.7% from the six months ended June 2, 2002. Total domestic sales were $447.6 million for the six months of 2003 compared to $489.6 million for the six months of 2002. Domestic sales decline of $42.0 million was attributable to an 8.5% decrease in volume partially offset by a 0.9% increase in average unit selling price. This unit volume decrease was primarily due to a $9.2 million decrease in floor sample shipments in 2003 as the Company was providing floor samples for the new Stearns & Foster roll-out in 2002, lower sales from affiliates and prior affiliates as they transition to multivendor retailers and general economic softness. For the six months ended June 1, 2003, sales to affiliates included sales to one affiliate for the entire period and sales to a prior affiliate for the majority of the period. Affiliate sales for the six months ended June 2, 2002 included sales to three affiliates. Total international sales were $110.5 million for the six months ended June 1, 2003 compared to $101.8 for the six months ended June 2, 2002. Growth of $8.7 million in the international operations was primarily attributable to sales growth in the European, Argentine and Brazilian markets.
Cost of Goods Sold. Cost of goods sold for the six months ended June 1, 2003, as a percentage of net sales, increased 1.9 percentage points to 58.6%. Cost of goods sold for the domestic business, as a percentage of net sales, increased 2.3 percentage points to 57.5%. This increase is primarily due to lower absorption of fixed costs due to lower unit sales, higher variable costs associated with increased workers compensation and health insurance costs, a lower mix of higher-end products that typically carry a higher margin than other products and costs associated with the shutdown of the Taylor facility in December. Cost of goods sold for the international business, as a percentage of net sales, decreased 0.5 percentage points to 63.5%. This decrease is primarily due to lower material costs in the Canadian and European businesses, partially offset by increased labor and fringe benefit costs in the European operations.
Selling, General, and Administrative. Selling, general, and administrative expenses decreased $28.0 million to $185.4 million, or 33.2% of net sales, compared to $213.4 million or 36.1% of net sales. This decrease is primarily due to an $18.4 decrease in bad debt expense as the Company recorded specific bad debt charges in the second quarter of 2002 primarily associated with affiliated customers. The Company also had decreased promotional and advertising costs, partially offset by higher corporate overhead expenses.
Stock Based Compensation. The Company has an obligation to repurchase certain securities of the Company held by an officer at the greater of estimated fair market value or original cost. The Company recorded a $1.0 million and $1.2 million charge for the six months ended June 1, 2003 and June 2, 2002, respectively, to revalue this obligation to reflect an increase in the fair market value of the securities.
Interest Expense. Interest expense decreased $3.5 million due to lower average debt levels and lower effective interest rates. In 2001, the Company entered into an interest rate swap agreement that effectively converted $236 million of its floating-rate debt to a fixed-rate basis through December 2006. In the second quarter of 2002, the Company entered into another interest rate swap agreement that has the effect of reestablishing as floating rate debt the debt previously converted to fixed rate debt through December 2006. The Company is required under its credit agreements to hedge at least 50% of its floating rate term debt.
Income Tax. The Companys effective income tax rates in 2003 and 2002 differ from the Federal statutory rate principally because of the effect of certain foreign tax rate differentials, state and local income taxes and operating losses in 2002 from a prior equity investee for which no tax benefit had been recorded. The Companys effective tax rate for the six months ended June 1, 2003 is approximately 42.3% compared to 55.4% for the six months ended June 2, 2002.
New Sealy Product Launch
The Company annually invests significantly in research and development to improve its product offerings. In June 2003, the Company launched an entirely new line of mattresses and box springs for its Sealy Posturepedic brand. All Sealy Posturepedic brand mattresses will be manufactured with UniCased Construction utilizing new proprietary processes and materials incorporated into a single-sided design. The
24
Company expects to incur increased costs in the third quarter associated with the introduction of the new product and the training of plant personnel in the new manufacturing processes. The Company does not expect the increased costs to materially affect long-term operating trends. Such introduction costs were not significant in the second quarter of 2003.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
The Companys principal sources of funds are cash flows from operations and borrowings under its Revolving Credit Facility. The Companys principal use of funds consists of payments of principal and interest on its Senior Credit Agreements, capital expenditures and interest payments on its outstanding Notes. Capital expenditures totaled $5.9 million for the six months ended June 1, 2003. The Company expects 2003 capital expenditures to be approximately $22.3 million. Management believes that annual capital expenditure limitations in its current debt agreements will not significantly inhibit the Company from meeting its ongoing capital needs. At June 1, 2003, the Company had approximately $34.1 million available under its Revolving Credit Facility including Letters of Credit issued totaling approximately $15.9 million. The Companys net weighted average borrowing cost was 9.0% and 9.1% for the six months ended June 1, 2003 and June 2, 2002, respectively. The Companys average interest rate has been positively impacted by the Companys interest rate derivatives as the Companys interest rate derivatives have effectively offset each other to reestablish the floating rate debt during a period of declining interest rates.
The Companys cash flow from operations decreased $39.7 million from $48.9 million for the six months ended June 2, 2002 to $9.2 million for the six months ended June 1, 2003. This decrease in operating cash flows is primarily the result of slower cash collections on customer accounts receivable. The Company also made significant payments in the first quarter associated with incentive compensation that were not made in the first quarter of 2002. The Company has also experienced difficulties in an accounts receivable system conversion in the fourth quarter of 2002 that continues to negatively impact collection efforts through June 2003. These issues have resulted principally in delays of processing of certain transactions and the Company also experienced deterioration in the aging of trade receivables. As a result, the Company increased its allowance for doubtful accounts $6.1 million in the fourth quarter of 2002. In the second quarter of 2003, the Company reassessed the progress of its collection efforts and determined an incremental $2.0 million reserve was necessary. The Company has increased the resources committed to this issue and believes processes are in place to provide for more control and stability in the processing of receivable transactions and the cash collection process. While the Company does not believe any further provisions for doubtful accounts are necessary, the Company is continuing to monitor remedial actions to ensure that the allowance is adequate and to improve future cash collections. The Companys failure to adequately resolve these issues could result in a material adverse affect to its liquidity and cash flow and future charges to earnings.
In the first quarter of 2002, the Company advanced $12.5 million to Mattress Discounters Corporation, an affiliate of the Company. As part of Mattress Discounters bankruptcy settlement in March 2003, the Company received a non-controlling minority interest in Mattress Discounters and a $12.9 million secured note, guaranteed by Mattress Holdings Corporation (MHC), a company in which Sealy had a minority equity interest and was controlled by the Sealys principal owners. In April 2003, the Company sold to MHC the $12.9 million note and the equity interest Sealy received in the Mattress Discounters bankruptcy, as well as the Companys equity interest in MHC for $13.6 million.
In May 2003, the Company completed a private placement of $50 million of 9.875% senior subordinated notes. These notes, which are due and payable on December 15, 2007 require semi-annual interest payments, commencing June 15, 2003. The proceeds from the placement were used to prepay all quarterly principal payments on the Senior AXELs Credit Facility through March 2004. The Company will commence quarterly principal payments on June 15, 2004. Subsequent to the issuance, the Company registered the notes with the Securities and Exchange Commission to allow them to be exchanged for publicly traded bonds. The Company commenced an exchange offer in June and expects to have it completed by the end of the third quarter. In
25
connection with the note issuance, the Company incurred $2.5 million in debt financing costs, of which $2.3 was paid in the second quarter. The Company also paid $1.2 million during the first quarter for previously accrued debt issuance costs associated with the refinancing of the Revolving Credit Facility in November 2002.
The Companys ability to make scheduled payments of principal, or to pay the interest or liquidated damages, if any, on, or to refinance our indebtedness, or to fund planned capital expenditures will depend on the Companys future performance, which, to a certain extent, is subject to general economic, financial, competitive, legislative, regulatory and other factors that are beyond control. Based upon the current level of operations and certain anticipated improvements, the Company believes that cash flow from operations and available cash, together with available borrowings under the senior credit agreement, will be adequate to meet the future liquidity needs throughout 2003. The Companys long-term obligations contain various financial test and covenants. The Company was in compliance with such covenants as of the six months ended June 1, 2003. The most restrictive covenants relate to ratios of adjusted EBITDA to interest coverage and total debt to adjusted EBITDA all as defined in the agreements. Those ratios change under the agreement over time and are less restrictive in 2003 versus those at the end of 2002. The Company does not foresee an inability to meet such covenants in 2003. The Company will, however, need to refinance all or a portion of the principal of the notes on or prior to maturity. In 1997, under the terms of the Companys Senior Subordinated Note Agreement the Company issued $128.0 million at a substantial discount from their principal amount at maturity. From the date of issuance until December 15, 2002 no interest accrued or was paid. On December 16, 2002 the Company started accruing interest with payment to be made semi-annually in June and December. Cash interest payments will increase approximately $13.3 million during 2003. However, management believes that the Company will have the necessary liquidity through cash flow from operations, and availability under the Revolving Credit Facility through 2004 to fund its expected capital expenditures, obligations under its credit agreement and subordinated note indentures, environmental liabilities, and for other needs required to manage and operate its business. The Companys scheduled principal payments on its borrowings will increase by approximately $25.2 million from 2003 to 2004. There can be no assurance that the Company will generate sufficient cash flow from operations, that anticipated revenue growth and operating improvements will be realized or that future borrowings will be available under the senior credit agreements in an amount sufficient to enable the Company to service its indebtedness, including the notes, or to fund our other liquidity needs. In addition, there can be no assurance that the Company will be able to effect any such refinancing on commercially reasonable terms or at all.
The Companys customers include furniture stores, national mass merchandisers, specialty sleep shops, department stores, contract customers and other stores. In the future, these retailers may consolidate, undergo restructurings or reorganizations, or realign their affiliations, any of which could decrease the number of stores that carry our products. These retailers are also subject to changes in consumer spending and the overall state of the economy both domestically and internationally. Any of these factors could have a material adverse effect on business, financial condition or results of operations.
Forward Looking Statements
This document contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Report Act of 1995. Although the Company believes its plans are based upon reasonable assumptions as of the current date, it can give no assurances that such expectations can be attained. Factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from the Companys expectations include: general business and economic conditions, competitive factors, raw materials pricing, and fluctuations in demand.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Information relative to the Companys market risk sensitive instruments by major category at December 1, 2002 is presented under Item 7a of the registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 1, 2002.
26
Foreign Currency Exposures
The Companys earnings are affected by fluctuations in the value of its subsidiaries functional currency as compared to the currencies of its foreign denominated purchases. Foreign currency forward, swap and option contracts are used to hedge against the earnings effects of such fluctuations. The result of a uniform 10% change in the value of the U.S. dollar relative to currencies of countries in which the Company manufactures or sells its products would not be material to earnings or financial position. This calculation assumes that each exchange rate would change in the same direction relative to the U.S. dollar.
Interest Rate Risk
In 2001, the Company entered into an interest rate swap agreement that effectively converted $236 million of its floating-rate debt to a fixed-rate basis through December 2006, thereby hedging against the impact of interest rate changes on future interest expense (forecasted cash flows). Use of hedging contracts allows the Company to reduce its overall exposure to interest rate changes, since gains and losses on these contracts will offset losses and gains on the transactions being hedged. The Company formally documents all hedged transactions and hedging instruments, and assesses, both at inception of the contract and on an ongoing basis, whether the hedging instruments are effective in offsetting changes in cash flows of the hedged transaction. The fair values of the interest rate agreements are estimated by obtaining quotes from brokers and are the estimated amounts that the Company would receive or pay to terminate the agreements at the reporting date, taking into consideration current interest rates and the current creditworthiness of the counterparties.
Effective June 3, 2002, the Company dedesignated the interest rate swap agreement for hedge accounting. As a result of the dedesignation, $12.9 million previously recorded in accumulated other comprehensive loss as of the date of dedesignation is being amortized into interest expense over the remaining life of the interest rate swap agreement. For the three months and six months ended June 1, 2003, $1.0 million and $2.0 million and was amortized into interest expense, respectively. Prior to June 3, 2002, the changes in the fair market value of the interest rate swap were recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss). Subsequent to June 3, 2002, changes in the fair market value of the interest rate swap are recorded in interest expense. For the three and six months ended June 1, 2003, $2.8 million and $7.5 million, respectively, was recorded as interest expense as a result of the change in its fair market value. At June 1, 2003 and December 1, 2002, the fair value carrying amount of this instrument was $(22.4) million and $(20.2) million, respectively, which is recorded as follows:
June 1, 2003 |
December 1, 2002 | |||||
(in millions) | ||||||
Accrued interest |
$ | 2.9 | $ | 2.1 | ||
Other accrued expenses |
11.1 | 7.6 | ||||
Other noncurrent liabilities |
8.4 | 10.5 | ||||
$ | 22.4 | $ | 20.2 | |||
During the second quarter of 2002, the Company entered into another interest rate swap agreement that has the effect of reestablishing as floating rate debt the debt previously converted to fixed rate debt through December 2006. This interest rate swap agreement has not been designated for hedge accounting and, accordingly, any changes in the fair value are to be recorded in interest expense. As a result of the change in fair market value, $2.6 million and $7.2 million was recorded as a reduction of interest expense for the three and six months ended June 1, 2003, respectively, and $0.5 million was recorded as additional interest expense for the three and six months ended June 2, 2002. At March 1, 2003 and December 1, 2002, the fair value carrying amount of this instrument was $12.1 million and $7.8 million with $9.3 million and $5.1 million recorded in prepaid expense and other current assets and $2.8 million and $2.7 million recorded in noncurrent assets, respectively.
A 10% increase or decrease in market interest rates that effect the Companys interest rate derivative instruments would not have a material impact on earnings during the next fiscal year.
27
To protect against the reduction in value of forecasted foreign currency cash flows resulting from purchases in foreign currency, the Company has instituted a forecasted cash flow hedging program. The Company hedges portions of its purchases denominated in foreign currencies with forward and options contracts. See also Note 9 to the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
Item 4. Internal Control and Procedures
Within the 90 days prior to the date of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, the Company evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of its disclosure controls and procedures (Disclosure Controls), and its internal controls and procedures for financial reporting (Internal Controls). This evaluation was done under the supervision and with the participation of management, including the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) and Chief Financial Officer (CFO). Rules adopted by the SEC require that in this section of our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q we present the conclusions of the CEO and CFO about the effectiveness of our Disclosure Controls and Internal Controls.
Disclosure Controls are procedures that are designed with the objective of ensuring that information required to be disclosed in our reports filed under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, such as this Quarterly Report, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time period specified in the SEC rules and forms. Disclosure Controls are also designed with the objective of ensuring that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including the CEO and CFO, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Internal Controls are procedures which are designed with the objective of providing reasonable assurance that our transactions are properly authorized; our assets are safeguarded against unauthorized or improper use; and our transactions are properly recorded and reported, all to permit the preparation of our consolidated financial statements in conformity with United States generally accepted accounting principles.
The Companys management, including the CEO and CFO, does not expect that the Companys Disclosure Controls or its Internal Controls will prevent all errors and all fraud. Control systems, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the Company have been detected. These inherent limitations include factors such as judgments in decision-making that can be faulty, and that breakdowns can occur because of simple error or mistake. Additionally, controls can be circumvented by the individual acts, by collusion of others, or by override of the control by management. The design of any system of controls also is based in part upon assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions; controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. Accordingly, because of these inherent limitations in a cost-effective control system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected.
The CEO and CFO evaluation of our Disclosure Controls and Internal Controls included a review of the controls objectives and design, the controls implementation by the Company and the effect of the controls on the information generated for use in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. In the course of this evaluation, the CEO and CFO sought to identify data errors, controls problems or acts of fraud and to confirm that appropriate corrective action, including process improvements, were undertaken.
Based on this evaluation, the CEO and CFO concluded that the Companys Disclosure Controls require improvement as a result of findings from the evaluation. These findings, similar to those disclosed and discussed in the Companys Form 10-K filed March 3, 2003, included certain deficiencies (e.g. reportable conditions) related to the timely processing of customer transactions, the matching of customer transactions and the accuracy of the aging of certain accounts receivable. Management, together with the CEO and CFO attribute the conditions identified above to a data processing and information technology conversion undertaken during fiscal
28
2002. The Company has taken various corrective actions during and after the quarter ended June 1, 2003, including increasing resources devoted to resolving these issues and improving collections, that address the identified conditions. Certain of these conditions continue to exist and additional corrective actions may be required to address these issues.
Except as described above, there are no significant changes in the Companys internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date the Company carried out its evaluation.
29
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings.
See Note 12 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, Part I, Item 1 included herein.
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
None
Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K
(a) |
Exhibits: | |
31.1 Chief Executive Officer Certification of the Quarterly Financial Statements | ||
31.2 Chief Financial Officer Certification of the Quarterly Financial Statements | ||
32 Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 | ||
(b) |
Reports on Form 8-K: | |
Press release announcing first quarter 2003 financials filed April 17, 2003 |
30
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, Sealy Corporation has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
SEALY CORPORATION | ||
Signature |
Title | |
/S/ DAVID J. MCILQUHAM David J. McIlquham |
Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) | |
/S/ JAMES B. HIRSHORN James B. Hirshorn |
Corporate Vice PresidentAdministration and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Accounting Officer) |
Date: July 16, 2003
31