Back to GetFilings.com

UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND

EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

For the fiscal year ended March 31, 2003

For the transition period from                          to                         

Commission file number 000-07438

Acterna Corporation

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

12410 Milestone Center Drive

Germantown, MD 20876

(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (240) 404-1550

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

None

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share

(Title of class)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.  Yes  x  No  ¨

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K  ¨

Indicate by checkmark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 12b-2).  Yes  ¨  No  x

At September 30, 2002 and June 19, 2003, the aggregate market value of the Common Stock of the registrant held by non-affiliates was $10,627,386 and $1,859,793, respectively.

At June 19, 2003, there were 192,282,130 shares of Common Stock of the registrant outstanding.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

Portions of the proxy statement for the 2003 Annual Meeting of Stockholders are incorporated by reference in Part III.

General

Acterna Corporation (the “Company” or “Acterna”), formerly Dynatech Corporation, was formed in 1959 and is a global communications equipment company focused on network technology solutions. The Company’s operations are conducted by wholly owned subsidiaries located principally in the United States of America and Europe with other operations, primarily sales offices, located in Asia and Latin America.

The Company’s continuing operations are managed in three business segments: communications test, industrial computing and communications, and digital color enhancement systems. The Company also had another segment, Airshow, which was sold on August 9, 2002 (See Note S Discontinued Operations to the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements dated as of March 31, 2003 and March 31, 2002 and for each of the three years in the period ended March 31, 2003 “Consolidated Financial Statements”) and is therefore, excluded from results of continuing operations for all periods presented through the date of disposition.

The communications test segment develops, manufactures and markets instruments, systems, software and services to test, deploy, manage and optimize communications networks and equipment. The Company offers products that enable testing, installation and maintenance of optical, access, cable and wireless networks and equipment. Its products are used by Network Operators and equipment manufacturers to support voice, data and video services. Industrial computing and communications (“Itronix”) segment provides portable computer products to the ruggedized personal computer market. Digital color enhancement systems are provided by da Vinci Systems, Inc., (“da Vinci”), a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, and are used in the production of television commercials and programming. da Vinci’s products are sold to post-production and video production professionals and producers of content for the standard- and high-definition television markets.

The Company’s principal offices are located at 12410 Milestone Center Drive, Germantown, Maryland 20876. Unless the context otherwise requires, the “Company” or “Acterna” refers to Acterna Corporation and its subsidiaries. Clayton, Dubilier & Rice Fund V Limited Partnership (“CDR Fund V”) and Clayton, Dubilier & Rice Fund VI Limited Partnership (“CDR Fund VI”), each of which are investment partnerships managed by Clayton, Dubilier & Rice, Inc. (“CDR”), collectively held approximately 80.1% of the Company’s common stock at March 31, 2003.

CHAPTER 11 FILING

On May 6, 2003 (the “Filing Date”), Acterna Corporation and its seven United States subsidiaries and affiliates filed voluntary petitions for reorganization under Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code (“Chapter 11”) in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York (the “Filing”). The Chapter 11 cases were consolidated for the administrative purpose of joint administration and were assigned case number 03-12837 (BRL) through 03-12843 (BRL). The Company’s non-U.S. subsidiaries were not included in the Filing.

The Filing was made in response to an ongoing decline in the communications test marketplace which has resulted in significant operating losses and the inability of the Company to perform in accordance with its financial covenants under the Senior Secured Credit Facility, its Senior Subordinated Notes, the Convertible Notes and the Company’s other debt obligations.

Under Chapter 11, the Company is operating its businesses as debtor-in-possession under court protection from its creditors and claimants, and intends to use Chapter 11 to substantially reduce its debt obligations and implement a plan of reorganization. As a debtor-in-possession, the Company may not engage in any transactions outside the ordinary course of business without the approval of the Bankruptcy Court, after notice and an opportunity for a hearing.

The Company concluded that, after evaluating all of its alternatives, a federal court-supervised Chapter 11 filing provides the best forum available to restructure its debt obligations.

As a consequence of the Filing, pending litigation against the Company is generally stayed (subject to certain exceptions in the case of governmental authorities), and no party may take any action to realize its pre-petition claims except pursuant to order of the Bankruptcy Court, including all attempts to collect claims or enforce liens that arose prior to the commencement of the Company’s Filing. Also, the Company may assume or reject pre-petition executory contracts and

2

unexpired leases pursuant to section 365 of the Bankruptcy Code, and other parties to executory contracts or unexpired leases being rejected may assert rejection damage claims as permitted thereunder.

The Company intends to address its plan for continued operations and all other pre-petition claims in a plan of reorganization. Prior to the Filing Date, the Company negotiated the salient terms of a plan of reorganization with certain key lenders under the Senior Secured Credit Facility. The Company’s current proposal for the plan of reorganization reflects:

There can be no assurance, however, that the Company’s proposal will be implemented, or that the Company’s creditors will not propose substantial changes to the Company’s proposal.

The Debtors have entered into a debtor-in-possession credit facility (the “DIP” facility) with certain members of its pre-petition bank group, for loans of up to $30 million, which has been approved by the Bankruptcy Court. The DIP facility is a borrowing base facility that fluctuates based on the cash on hand, amount of eligible accounts receivable and inventory of the Debtors. Upon the successful sale of certain non-core assets of the Company, an additional amount under the DIP facility would become available to the Debtors as well. The DIP facility also provides a sub-facility for letters of credit.

The Company’s Filing is further discussed in Item 3 of this Report, and in Note B. Voluntary Bankruptcy Filing to the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Conditions and Results of Operations” in Appendix B to this Report.

In addition to general economic, business and market conditions discussed in detail in Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, the Company is also subject to other risks and uncertainties, including the following:

3

Communications Test Segment

The Company’s communications test segment develops, manufactures and markets a broad range of instruments, systems, software and services used by communications service providers, equipment manufacturers and service users to optimize the development, manufacture, and management of communications networks. The Company’s extensive knowledge of communications technologies, combined with the broad capabilities of its test and management products and services, enable the Company to provide solutions that enable Network Operators to accelerate deployment of new technologies and services, reduce capital expenditures, and reduce operating expenses.

The Company’s test and management systems currently support a wide array of transmission technologies, protocols and standards, including:

The Company markets to three primary groups of customers: communications service providers, communications equipment manufacturers and service users. Communications service providers rely on the Company’s products and services to test and manage network elements and the traffic that runs across them. Equipment manufacturers rely on these products to shorten the product development phase and verify the proper functioning of their products during final assembly and to monitor the performance of their products during installation and maintenance in their customers’ networks. Finally, service users rely on these products to ensure the proper functioning of their communications networks. The instruments, systems, software, and services described below offer solutions to these customer-specific needs.

Instruments. Instruments are devices that perform various communications test and monitoring functions. Designed to be mobile devices, these products assist technicians in assessing the performance of devices and network segments or verifying the integrity of the information being transmitted across the network. These instruments incorporate high levels of intelligence and have user interfaces that are designed to simplify the operation of these products and decrease the training required to use them. The Company currently markets more than 100 instruments, including products to address the performance of optical transmission equipment, broadband access technologies (xDSL and cable modems), data, voice, wireless and cable networks. The Company’s instruments are used by service providers, equipment manufacturers and service users.

Systems. The Company’s systems are test and management devices that reside in its customers’ communication networks. They can be accessed remotely using an intelligent terminal and allow multiple users to simultaneously perform specific communications test and management functions. Typically, these systems consist of hardware and software components that are derived from core instrument products. Using an integrated test and management system, the Company’s customers are able to analyze a variety of network elements, transmission technologies and protocols from a single console, thereby simplifying the process of deploying, provisioning and managing network equipment and services. From a centralized location, technicians in their network operations center can access the test systems within the network and perform simultaneous test and monitoring functions on one or more systems, either manually or in an automated fashion.

4

These capabilities decrease the need for technicians to make on-site service calls and allow service providers to respond to potential network faults proactively.

Software. The Company provides both software products and custom software development services. Software products address applications for network capacity management, test operations support systems and workflow solutions. Software services are provided to customize software applications and to interface Acterna software to customer systems.

Services. The Company offers a range of product support and professional services geared to comprehensively address its customers’ requirements. The Company provides repair, calibration and software support services for its products and also provides technical assistance on a global basis for a wide array of test equipment. In addition, the Company offers customers training services that are aimed at both product and technology areas. Project management services are an integral part of the professional service offerings. These professional services are provided in conjunction with system integration projects that include installation and implementation services. The Company provides both product and process consulting to its customers.

Industrial Computing and Communications Segment

Itronix, headquartered in Spokane, WA, is a global provider of mobile, wireless, ruggedized computing solutions, including laptop and handheld computing devices. Itronix also provides a wide range of support services including long-term maintenance contracts, implementation support, and product installation.

Itronix offers a broad product and service line, including computing devices in both semi-rugged and fully-rugged configurations. Itronix products and services are sold worldwide through its direct sales force as well as through resellers and manufacturers representatives.

Digital Color Enhancement Systems Segment

da Vinci, headquartered in Coral Springs, FL., manufactures and sells digital color correction systems used by video post-production and commercial production facilities to correct and enhance color saturation levels in the film post-production process. da Vinci systems are sold worldwide through its direct sales force in the United States, as well as in conjunction with manufacturers of related products.

Manufacturing

The Company manufactures a portion of its products and outsources to third parties a portion of its manufacturing activities, such as the assembly of printed circuit boards, fabrication of mechanical parts and final assembly and test. The Company operates six manufacturing and assembly facilities worldwide which have undergone quality certification processes per ISO 9001.

The components used to build the Company’s products are generally available from a number of suppliers; however, the Company relies on a number of limited-source suppliers for specific components and parts. Although the Company has entered into long-term purchasing contracts with some of these suppliers, the Company cannot assure that these suppliers will be able to meet the Company’s needs or that component shortages will not be experienced. If the Company were required to locate new suppliers or additional sources of supply, the Company could experience a disruption in its operations, an increase in its costs and experience a decline in revenue. Due to the long lead times and exclusive nature of some of the components purchased by its suppliers, the Company is often required to enter into long term commitments with certain of its suppliers.

As a result of the Filing, relationships with the Company’s suppliers may be disrupted which could have a negative impact on operations and the Company’s results of operations.

Competition

The markets for communications test products and services are rapidly evolving and highly competitive. The principal competitive factors affecting the business include:

5

The Company believes it competes favorably with respect to the above factors. Its principal competitors in the communications test and management markets include Agilent Technologies, Spirent, Sunrise Telecom, Inc., and Anritsu. The Company also competes with a number of other companies that offer products that address discrete portions of its markets, including EXFO Electro-Optical Engineering, Digital Lightwave, Fluke, NetTest and Trend Communications. Itronix’s competitors include Panasonic, LXE and Handheld Products. da Vinci’s competitors include Mathematical Technologies and Colorfront. Some of these competitors have greater sales, marketing, research and financial resources than the Company. In addition, new competitors with significant market presence and financial resources may enter markets in which the Company competes and reduce the Company’s market share. The Company’s Filing, and the underlying financial issues that led to the Filing, could also hamper its ability to compete.

Customers

The Company markets its communication test products to three primary groups of customers: communications service providers, equipment manufacturers and service users (see Note T. Segment Information and Geographic Areas in the notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for financial information on the segments).

Communications Service Providers

Communications service providers offer voice, data and video services to end users, enterprises or other service providers. Typically, communications service providers utilize a variety of network equipment and software to originate, transport and terminate communications sessions. Communications service providers rely on the Company’s products and services to test and manage network elements and the traffic that runs across these elements.

The Company’s products and services are sold to Network Operators around the world. This includes inter-exchange carriers, or IXCs; incumbent local exchange carriers, or ILECs; competitive local exchange carriers, or CLECs; internet service providers, or ISPs; integrated communications providers, or ICPs; wireless network operators; cable service providers; international post, telephone and telegraph companies, or PTTs; and other service providers.

Equipment Manufacturers

Communications equipment manufacturers design, develop, install and maintain voice, data and video communications equipment. These products include switches, routers, voice gateways, cellular base stations, cable head-ends, optical access and multiplexing devices and other types of communications systems. Network equipment manufacturers rely on the Company’s products to verify the proper functioning of their products during final assembly and testing. In addition, because communications service providers are choosing to outsource installation and maintenance functions to the equipment manufacturers themselves, equipment manufacturers are increasingly using the Company’s instruments and systems to assess the performance of their products during installation and maintenance of a customer’s network.

Service Users

The Company also sells test and management instruments, systems, and services to large corporate customers, government operators and educational institutions.

Itronix products and services are sold to customers with wireless mobile computing needs in the communication, home and business services, utility, insurance, emergency services, military, and field service markets.

da Vinci systems are sold to video post-production and commercial production facilities.

6

None of the Company’s customers represented more than 10 percent of its sales during fiscal 2003. The Company is not dependent upon any one customer, or group of customers, to the extent that the loss of such customers would have a material adverse effect on the Company.

Sales, Marketing and Customer Support

The Company’s communications test products and services are primarily sold through its direct sales force. In addition, the Company’s communications test products and services are sold through third party distributors and sales representatives in areas where direct sales efforts are less developed. Through distributors, sales representatives and its direct sales force, the Company has a presence in over 80 countries. In addition, the Company uses the Internet, advertisements in the trade press, direct mail, seminars, trade shows and quarterly newsletters to raise awareness of its products.

The Company’s communications test sales and marketing staff consists primarily of engineers and technical professionals. They undergo extensive training and ongoing professional development and education. The skill level of the sales and marketing staff has been instrumental in building longstanding customer relationships. In addition, the Company’s frequent dialogue with its customers provides it with valuable input on systems and features they desire in future products. The Company’s consultative sales approach and product and market knowledge differentiates its sales force from those of its primary competitors. The sales forces are highly knowledgeable of their respective markets, customer operations and strategies, and regulatory environments. In addition, the representatives’ familiarity with local languages and customs enables them to build close relationships with the Company’s customers.

The Company provides installation, repair and training services to enable its customers to improve performance of their networks. Service centers are located near many of the Company’s major customers. The Company also offers on-line support services to supplement its on-site application engineering support. Customers can also access many of the Company’s products remotely through its technical assistance center.

Seasonality; Backlog

As a result of purchasing patterns of the Company’s telecommunications customers, which tend to place large orders periodically, typically during the third quarter and at the end of the Company’s fourth fiscal quarter, the Company expects that its results of operations may vary on a quarterly basis, as they have in the past.

The Company estimates that its backlog of orders at March 31, 2003, and 2002 was approximately $137.0 million and $192.7 million, respectively. The decrease in backlog is primarily a result of the downturn in the communications test industry. The Company expects it will be able to fill the majority of the backlog during fiscal 2004.

Product Development

For the year ended March 31, 2003, the Company invested approximately $104.7 million in research and development activities of which approximately $89.9 million applied to the Company’s communications test segment.

The market for the Company’s products and services is characterized by rapidly changing technologies, new and evolving industry standards and protocols, and product and service introductions and enhancements that may render the Company’s existing offerings obsolete or unmarketable. Automation in the Company’s targeted markets for communications test equipment or a shift in customer emphasis from employee-operated communications test to automated test and monitoring systems could likewise render the Company’s existing product offerings obsolete or unmarketable, or reduce the size of one or more of its targeted markets. In particular, incorporation of self-testing functions in the equipment currently addressed by the Company’s communications test instruments could render some of the Company’s offerings redundant and unmarketable. The development of new, technologically advanced products is a complex and uncertain process requiring the accurate anticipation of technological and market trends and the incurrence of substantial research and development costs.

International

The Company maintains manufacturing facilities and sales subdivisions or branches for its communications test business in major countries in Europe, sales subdivisions in Latin America and Asia, and has distribution agreements in other countries where sales volume does not warrant a direct sales organization. The Company’s foreign sales (including exports from domestic facilities directly to foreign customers) were approximately 49%, 43%, and 40% of consolidated net sales in fiscal 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively. Accordingly, the Company’s domestic sales were 51%, 57% and 60% of consolidated net sales in fiscal 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively.

Because the Company sells its products worldwide, the Company’s business is subject to risks associated with doing business internationally. In addition, many of the Company’s manufacturing facilities and suppliers are located outside the

7

United States. Accordingly, the Company’s future results could be harmed by a variety of factors, including changes in foreign currency exchange rates, changes in a specific country or region’s political or economic conditions, particularly in emerging markets, trade protection measures, import or export licensing requirements, and potentially negative consequences from changes in tax and labor laws or other regulatory requirements.

Financial Information About Geographic Areas.

See Note T. Segment Information and Geographic Areas to the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements.

Patents and Proprietary Rights

The Company relies primarily on trade secrets, trademark laws, confidentiality procedures and contractual restrictions to establish and protect its proprietary rights. The Company owns a number of United States and foreign patents and patent applications that are collectively important to its business. The Company does not believe, however, that the expiration of any patent or group of patents would materially affect its business.

Government Regulation and Industry Standards and Protocols

The Company designs its products to comply with a significant number of industry standards and regulations, some of which are evolving as new technologies are deployed. In the United States, these products must comply with various regulations defined by the United States. Federal Communications Commission and Underwriters Laboratories as well as industry standards established by Telcordia Technologies, Inc., formerly Bellcore, and the American National Standards Institute. Internationally, these products must comply with standards established by the European Committee for Electrotechnical Standardization, the European Committee for Standardization, the European Telecommunications Standards Institute, telecommunications authorities in various countries, as well as with recommendations of the International Telecommunications Union. The failure of the Company’s products to comply, or delays in compliance, with the various existing and evolving standards could negatively impact the Company’s ability to sell its products.

Environmental Matters

Federal, state and local laws or regulations concerning the discharge of materials into the environment have not had, and, the Company, under present conditions, does not foresee that they will have, a material adverse effect on capital expenditures, earnings or the competitive position of the Company.

Employees

As of March 31, 2003, the Company employed approximately 2,840 persons. Some of the European employees are members of a workers’ council, principally due to applicable legal requirements in the jurisdictions in which they work. However, none of the Company’s other employees are represented by labor unions, and the Company believes its employee relations are good.

Available Information

The Company files its annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q and current reports on Form 8-K pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 with the SEC electronically. The public may read or copy any materials on file with the SEC at the SEC’s Public Reference Room at 450 Fifth Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20549. The public may obtain information on the operation of the Public Reference Room by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. The SEC maintains an Internet site that contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC. The address of that site is http://www.sec.gov. You may obtain a free copy of the Company’s annual reports on Form 10-K on our website on the World Wide Web at http://www.acterna.com.

The following table describes the Company’s largest design and manufacturing facilities as of March 31, 2003. The Company also has sales offices and facilities in Europe, South America and elsewhere.

8

The Company believes its facilities are in good operating condition.

On May 6, 2003, the Company and its seven domestic subsidiaries filed voluntary petitions for relief under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code in the Bankruptcy Court (Case Nos. 12837 (BRL) through 12843 (BRL)). The Company continues to operate its business and manage its property as a debtor-in-possession pursuant to sections 1107 and 1108 of the Bankruptcy Code. As a result of the Filing, attempts to collect, secure or enforce remedies with respect to pre-petition claims against the Company are subject to the automatic stay provisions of section 362(a) of the Bankruptcy Code. The Company’s Chapter 11 cases are discussed in greater detail in Note B. Voluntary Bankruptcy Filing to the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements and Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Voluntary Bankruptcy Filing.

On April 16, 2003, Sik-Lin Huang commenced class action litigation, in the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, against the Company and certain of its officers and directors alleging that the Company and certain of its officers and directors committed certain securities law violations.

The Company is a party to several pending legal proceedings and claims. Although the outcome of such proceeding and claims cannot be determined with certainty, the Company believes that the final outcome should not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, operations or financial position.

None.

The Company’s common stock is currently traded on the Over-the-Counter Market, (“OTC”) under the symbol “ACTRQ.OB”. From November 9, 2000 to February 2, 2003, the common stock traded on the NASDAQ National Market under the symbol “ACTR”. From February 3, 2003 to May 6, 2003, the common stock traded on the OTC under the symbol “ACTR.OB”. As a result of the Filing, the Company’s symbol changed to ACTRQ.OB. As of March 31, 2003, there were 599 registered holders of the common stock, and the price of the common stock on the OTC was $0.06.

The table below sets forth the high and low sales prices of the Company’s common stock on the OTC and the NASDAQ National Market for each quarterly period within the two most recent fiscal years.

9

Since April 1, 1995, the Company has not declared or paid cash dividends to the holders of common stock. As a result of the Filing, the Company does not expect to pay dividends to the holders of common stock. Additionally, the Company expects that holders of the common stock will not receive any recovery under the plan of reorganization.

The information requested by this Item is attached as Appendix A.

The information requested by this Item is attached as Appendix B.

The information requested by this Item is included in Appendix B.

The information requested by this Item is attached as Appendix C.

None.

Reference is made to the information responsive to Items 401 and 405 of Regulation S-K contained in the Company’s definitive Proxy Statement relating to its fiscal 2003 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, which will be filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission within 120 days after the close of the Company’s fiscal year ended March 31, 2003 pursuant to Rule 14a-6(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or if such Proxy Statement is not filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on or before 120 days after the end of the fiscal year covered by this Report, such information will be included in an amendment to this Report filed no later than the end of such 120-day period. Said information is incorporated herein by reference.

Reference is made to the information responsive to Item 402 of Regulation S-K contained in the Company’s definitive Proxy Statement relating to its fiscal 2003 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, which will be filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission within 120 days after the close of the Company’s fiscal year ended March 31, 2003 pursuant to Rule 14a-6(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or if such Proxy Statement is not filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on or before 120 days after the end of the fiscal year covered by this Report, such information will be included in an amendment to this Report filed no later than the end of such 120-day period. Said information is incorporated herein by reference.

Reference is made to the information responsive to Item 403 of Regulation S-K contained in the Company’s definitive Proxy Statement relating to its fiscal 2003 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, which will be filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission within 120 days after the close of the Company’s fiscal year ended March 31, 2003 pursuant to Rule 14a-6(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or if such Proxy Statement is not filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on or before 120 days after the end of the fiscal year covered by this Report, such information will be included in an amendment to this Report filed no later than the end of such 120-day period. Said information is incorporated herein by reference.

The following table sets forth information concerning compensation plans previously approved by security holders and not previously approved by security holders.

10

Equity Compensation Plan Information

Reference is made to the information responsive to Item 404 of Regulation S-K contained in the Company’s definitive Proxy Statement relating to its fiscal 2003 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, which will be filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission within 120 days after the close of the Company’s fiscal year ended March 31, 2003 pursuant to Rule 14a-6(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or if such Proxy Statement is not filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on or before 120 days after the end of the fiscal year covered by this Report, such information will be included in an amendment to this Report filed no later than the end of such 120-day period. Said information is incorporated herein by reference.

(a) Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures. The Company’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer, based on their evaluation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, have concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are adequate and effective for the purposes set forth in the definition in the Exchange Act rules.

(b) Changes in Internal Controls. There were no significant changes in the Company’s internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect the Company’s internal controls subsequent to the date of their evaluation.

Compliance with this item is not yet mandatory.

(a) (1) Financial statements

The following financial statements and schedules of the Company are included as Appendix C to this Report.

11

Schedules other than those listed above have been omitted because they are either not required or not applicable or because the required information has been included elsewhere in the financial statements or notes thereto.

(b) Reports on Form 8-K

(c) Exhibits

The exhibits that are filed with this report or that are incorporated herein by reference are set forth in Appendix D.

12

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

June 30, 2003

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

13

CERTIFICATIONS

I, John R. Peeler, certify that:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual report (the “Evaluation Date”); and

c) presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant’s auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls; and

Date: June 30, 2003

14

I, John D. Ratliff, certify that:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual report (the “Evaluation Date”); and

c) presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant’s auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls; and

Date: June 30, 2003

15

APPENDIX A

SELECTED HISTORICAL CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA

The following tables set forth selected historical consolidated financial data of the Company for the five fiscal years ended March 31, 2003 which have been derived from, and should be read in conjunction with, the audited Consolidated Financial Statements, and related notes thereto, of the Company contained elsewhere in this report

*The Results of Operations for fiscal 2001 include the results of operations of Wavetek Wandel Goltermann, Inc. since May 23, 2000, the date of its acquisition, and the results of operations of Cheetah Technologies since August 23, 2000, the date of its acquisition.

A-1

APPENDIX B

MANAGEMENT DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION

AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

OVERVIEW

The following discussion of the results of operations, analysis of financial condition and liquidity of the Company should be read in conjunction with the information contained in the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements and notes thereto included elsewhere in this Form 10-K. These statements have been prepared in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles and require management to make estimates and assumptions that affect amounts reported and disclosed in the financial statements and related notes. Actual results could differ from these estimates.

Unless otherwise noted, the information presented in this Appendix B reflects the business of the Company and its subsidiaries, including the results of acquired businesses. Wavetek Wandel Goltermann, Inc. (“WWG”)’s results of operations are included in the Statement of Operations since May 23, 2000; Cheetah Technologies (“Cheetah”)’s results of operations are included since August 23, 2000. The results of ICS Advent are included through October 31, 2001, the date it was sold by the Company. The results of Airshow Inc., (“Airshow”) have been segregated from continuing operations and reported within income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax, in the Statement of Operations through August 9, 2002, the date of its disposition. The statements contained in this report (other than the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements and other statements of historical fact) include forward-looking statements, as described below in greater detail under the heading “Forward-Looking Statements.”

VOLUNTARY-BANKRUPTCY FILING

On May 6, 2003, Acterna Corporation and its seven United States subsidiaries and affiliates (“the Debtors”) filed voluntary petitions for reorganization under Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code (“Chapter 11”) in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York (the “Filing”). The Debtors’ Chapter 11 cases were consolidated for the administrative purpose of joint administration and were assigned case number 03-12837 (BRL) through 03-12843 (BRL) the (“Chapter 11 Cases”). The Company’s non-U.S. subsidiaries were not included in the filing.

The Filing was made in response to an ongoing decline in the communications test marketplace, which has resulted in significant operating losses and the inability of the Company to perform in accordance with its financial covenants under the Senior Secured Credit Facility, the Senior Subordinated Notes, the Convertible Notes and its other debt obligations.

Under Chapter 11, the Company is operating its businesses as debtor-in-possession under court protection from its creditors and claimants and intends to use Chapter 11 to substantially reduce its debt obligations and implement a plan of reorganization. As a debtor-in-possession, the Company may not engage in any transactions outside the ordinary course of business without the approval of the Bankruptcy Court, after notice and an opportunity for a hearing.

The Company concluded, after exploring all of its alternatives, that a federal court-supervised Chapter 11 filing provides the best forum available to achieve a reduction in debt.

Consequence of Filing—As a consequence of the Filing, pending litigation against the Debtors for pre-petition matters is generally stayed (subject to certain exceptions in the case of governmental authorities), and no party may take action to realize its pre-petition claims except pursuant to an order of the Bankruptcy Court, including all attempts to collect claims or enforce liens that arose prior to the commencement of the Company’s Filing. Also, the debtor may assume or reject pre-petition executory contracts and unexpired leases pursuant to section 365 of the Bankruptcy Code and other parties to executory contracts or unexpired leases being rejected may assert rejection damage claims as permitted thereunder.

The Company intends to address its plan for continued operations and all other pre-petition claims in a plan of reorganization. Prior to the filing Date, the Company negotiated the salient terms of a plan of reorganization with certain key lenders under the Senior Secured Credit Facility. It is currently impossible to predict with any degree of certainty how pre-petition claims will be treated or if the plan of reorganization will be approved by the creditors. The Company intends to address its plan for continued operations and all other pre-petition claims in a plan of reorganization. Prior to the Filing Date, the Company negotiated the salient terms of a plan of reorganization with certain key lenders under the Senior Secured Credit Facility. The Company’s current proposal for the plan of reorganization reflects:

B-1

Acterna, subject to dilution in connection with the warrants described below and a management incentive plan;

There can be no assurance, however, that the Company’s proposal will be implemented, or that the Company’s creditors will not propose substantial changes to the Company’s proposal.

Status of Chapter 11 Proceedings—The Debtors have received approval from the Bankruptcy Court to pay or otherwise honor certain of its pre-petition obligations in the ordinary course of business, including employee wages and benefits, customer programs, shipping charges and a limited amount of claims of essential trade creditors.

As provided by the Bankruptcy Code, the Debtors have the exclusive right to propose a plan of reorganization during a 120-day period following the Filing Date. The Debtors have the right to file an extension of the exclusivity period during which to file a plan of reorganization but it is currently the Company’s intent to file within the 120 day period. On May 20, 2003, the office of the United States Trustee appointed a creditors’ committee to represent the interests of unsecured creditors. This committee will have the right to be heard on all matters that come before the Bankruptcy Court. The Debtors are required to bear certain of the committees’ costs and expenses, including those of their counsel and financial advisors.

On June 24, 2003 the Bankruptcy Court entered an order establishing a bar date of July 31, 2003 for claims of general unsecured creditors. At this time, it is not possible to estimate the value of the claims that will ultimately be allowed by the Bankruptcy Court, due to the uncertainties of the Chapter 11 process.

Impact on Debt Capital—Substantially all of the Debtors’ pre-petition debt is in default due to the failure to pay interest due on March 31, 2003 and as a result of the Filing. The accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets as of March 31, 2003 reflects the classification of the Debtors’ pre-petition debt as current because of this default. The Company has certain debt that is owed by foreign subsidiaries of the Company that are not part of the Filing. To the extent that this debt has a long term portion, it is shown as such.

The Debtors have entered into a debtor-in-possession credit facility (the “DIP facility”) with certain members of its pre-petition bank group, for loans of up to $30 million which has been approved by the Bankruptcy Court. The DIP facility is a borrowing base facility that fluctuates based on the cash on hand, amount of eligible accounts receivable and inventory of the Debtors. Upon the successful sale of certain non-core assets of the Company, an additional amount under the DIP facility would become available to the Debtors as well. The DIP facility also provides a sub-facility for letters of credit.

Accounting Impact—The accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements have not been prepared in accordance with Statement of Position No. 90-7 “Financial Reporting by Entities in Reorganization Under the Bankruptcy Code”, (“SOP 90-7”) promulgated by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, as the Filing Date occurred subsequent to the Company’s fiscal year end. Future statements will be prepared in accordance with SOP 90-7 which requires that financial statements of debtors-in-possession be prepared on a going-concern basis, which contemplates continuity of operations, realization of assets and liquidation of liabilities in the ordinary course of business. However, as a result of the Filing, the realization of certain Debtors’ assets and the liquidation of certain Debtors’ liabilities are subject to significant uncertainty. While operating as debtors-in-possession, the Debtors may sell or otherwise dispose of assets and liquidate or settle liabilities for amounts other than those reflected in the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements. Further, a plan of reorganization could materially change the amounts and classifications reported in the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements, which do not currently give effect of any adjustments to the carrying value or classification of assets or liabilities that might be necessary as a consequence of a plan of reorganization.

BUSINESS SEGMENTS

The Company reports its results of continuing operations in three business segments: communications test, industrial computing, and communications and digital color enhancement systems.

B-2

The communications test segment develops, manufactures and markets instruments, systems, software and services to test, deploy, manage and optimize communications networks, equipment and services.

The industrial computing and communications segment provides computer products to the ruggedized computer market. This segment was comprised of two subsidiaries: ICS Advent and Itronix. On October 31, 2001, the ICS Advent subsidiary was disposed through a sale (See Note E. Acquisitions and Divestitures to the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements). ICS Advent sold computer products and systems designed to withstand excessive temperatures, dust, moisture and vibration in harsh operating environments. Itronix sells ruggedized portable communications and computing devices used by field service workers.

Digital color enhancement systems are provided by da Vinci These systems are used in the production of television commercials and programming. da Vinci’s products are sold to post-production and video production professionals and producers of content for the standard and high-definition television markets.

The Company also had another segment, Airshow, which was sold in August 2002 and has been excluded from results of continuing operations for all periods presented through the date of disposition (see Note S. Discontinued Operations to the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements).

RELATED PARTY

The Company’s controlling stockholders are Clayton, Dubilier & Rice Fund V Limited Partnership (“CDR Fund V”) and Clayton, Dubilier & Rice Fund VI Limited Partnership (“CDR Fund VI”, collectively the “CDR Funds”). The CDR Funds are managed by Clayton, Dubilier & Rice, Inc. (“CDR”), an investment management firm. The CDR Funds held approximately 80.1% of the outstanding shares of common stock of the Company at March 31, 2003.

On June 24, 2002, Acterna LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, along with CD&R VI (Barbados), Ltd. (“CD&R Barbados”), commenced cash tender offers, as amended, for up to $155 million, on a combined basis, in principal amount of its outstanding 9.75% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2008. The tender offers provided for cash consideration of $220 in exchange for each $1,000 principal amount of notes tendered, and all accrued interest due thereon. These combined tender offers expired on August 12, 2002 and resulted in the purchase and retirement of notes having an aggregate principal value of $106.3 million by Acterna LLC and the purchase of notes having an aggregate principal value of $43 million by CD&R Barbados. In connection with these combined tender offers, Acterna LLC granted CD&R Barbados the right (which CD&R Barbados agreed to exercise only at the request of the administration agent under the Senior Secured Credit Facility) to invest all future cash interest received, on an after tax basis, on all the Senior Subordinated Notes held by CD&R Barbados in new Convertible Notes of Acterna LLC. The new notes that will be issued upon such reinvestment will have terms substantially similar to the 12% Convertible Notes due 2007 issued to CDR Fund VI in January 2002, except that the interest rate and conversion rate applicable to any series of new notes will be determined at the time of issuance. During December 2002 in connection with an interest payment on the senior subordinated notes by Acterna LLC, CD&R Barbados exercised this right to reinvest $2.8 million of its after tax interest proceeds in newly issued senior secured convertible notes of Acterna LLC due 2007. Interest on these notes is to be paid semi-annually, in arrears, at a rate of 12% per annum. These notes have a conversion rate of 2,273 shares of common stock per $1,000 of principal. CD&R Barbados is a Barbados company, and all of the capital stock of CD&R Barbados is owned by CDR Fund VI.

On January 15, 2002, Acterna LLC issued and sold at par $75 million aggregate principal amount of 12% Senior Secured Convertible Notes due 2007 (the “Convertible Notes”) to CDR Fund VI. Interest on the Convertible Notes is payable semi-annually in arrears on each March 31^st and September 30^th. Interest payments commenced on March 31, 2002. At the option of Acterna LLC, interest is payable in cash or in-kind by the issuance of additional convertible notes. During fiscal 2003, additional Convertible Notes for the principal amount of $9.6 million were issued for the accrued interest. The Company recorded these notes at their fair market value at the time of issuance which resulted in a cumulative discount of $6.0 million. The discount is shown as a reduction to interest expense and is being amortized over the life of the Convertible Note. The Convertible Notes are secured by a second lien on all of the assets of the Company and its subsidiaries that secure the Senior Secured Credit Facility and are guaranteed by the Company and its domestic subsidiaries.

The Company paid an annual management fee to CDR totaling $0.0 million, $1.6 million and $0.5 million in the three fiscal years ending March 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively. In return for the annual management fee, CDR provides management and financial consulting services to the Company and its subsidiaries. In fiscal 2002, the Company also paid CDR a $2.3 million financing fee in connection with the issuance of the Convertible Notes.

B-3

In connection with the merger between a subsidiary of the Company and WWG in May 2000 (the “WWG Merger”) and the concurrent establishment of the Company’s new Senior Secured Credit Facility, the Company paid CDR $6.0 million, of which $3.0 million has been allocated to deferred debt issuance costs and $3.0 million has been allocated to additional paid-in capital in connection with the rights offering to the Company’s other stockholders undertaken by the Company in June 2000.

On May 19, 1999, Mr. Ned C. Lautenbach, a principal of CDR, became the Company’s Chairman and Chief Executive Officer. Mr. Lautenbach did not receive direct compensation from the Company for these services. However, his compensation for any services was included in the above mentioned management and consulting arrangement. Mr. Lautenbach was succeeded as Chief Executive Officer on March 17, 2003 by the Company’s President, Mr. John R. Peeler. Mr. Lautenbach retained his position as Chairman of the Company’s Board of Directors.

ASSET IMPAIRMENT

As a result of increasingly unfavorable market conditions, the Company revised and reduced its long-term financial forecast. Based on this revision of the long-term outlook, the Company, assisted by independent valuation consultants, completed an assessment of the carrying value of goodwill in the communications test segment, as required by SFAS No. 142. The results of the impairment analysis, which were derived by utilizing, among other methods, a discounted cash flow analysis and an analysis of other market comparables, indicated that the carrying amount of goodwill within the communications test segment exceeded its estimated fair value. Accordingly, the Company recorded an impairment charge of $374.2 million on a before and after tax basis. This charge was recorded within the communications test segment and has been included in the impairment charge in the Statements of Operations, (Note H. Goodwill to the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements).

During fiscal 2003, the Company performed an annual review of the long lived assets. As a result of that review the Company recorded a $9.6 million charge associated with the impairment of owned real property that has experienced a non-temporary reduction in value. The Company also decided to discontinue the on-going implementation of its global enterprise resource planning (“ERP”) software system as well as other less significant projects. As a result of these decisions, the Company wrote off $14.2 million of assets, including $13.6 million of capitalized internal-use software costs. These assets were previously included in the machinery and equipment classification of property and equipment. The $14.2 and $9.6 million charges are included in the impairment charge in the Statements of Operations.

CASH AND DEBT SERVICE

During fiscal 2003, the Company took actions to reduce its operating costs by reducing its existing workforce and by disposing of its Airshow subsidiary, that was not considered to be part of the Company’s long-term core operations. The Company used the net proceeds from the sale of Airshow to repay $128.5 million of its outstanding debt under the Senior Secured Credit Facility. Concurrent with the sale of Airshow, the Company completed a tender offer resulting in the purchase and retirement of Senior Subordinated Notes having an aggregate principal of $106.3 million for $220 per $1,000 of principal. During fiscal 2003, the Company borrowed $87.0 million under its Revolving Credit Facility, which was available as a result of the use of the proceeds from the Convertible Notes issued to CDR Fund VI in January 2002. As of March 31, 2003, the Company had $57.6 million of cash and cash equivalents on hand. The Company failed to pay $6.7 million of required interest payments on the Senior Secured Credit Facility, which became due on March 31, 2003, resulting in a default on the Senior Secured Credit Facility and cross defaults on the Senior Subordinated Notes, the Convertible Notes and other debt obligations of the Company.

On May 6, 2003 (the “Filing Date”), the Company and its seven United States subsidiaries and affiliates filed voluntary Chapter 11 petitions in Federal Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York and is currently operating as a debtor-in-possession (See Note B. Voluntary Bankruptcy Filing to the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements). The Company has reached an agreement with certain members of its bank group to obtain a DIP facility of up to $30 million, which has been approved by the U. S. Bankruptcy Court. The DIP is a borrowing base facility that fluctuates based on, among other things, the Company’s cash, amount of eligible accounts receivable and inventory of the Debtors. Upon the successful sale of certain non-core assets of the Company, a portion of these proceeds would be available for borrowing by the Debtors as well. The DIP also provides a sub-facility for letters of credit.

The Company cannot provide any assurance that its available cash and financing will be adequate to fund on-going operations, nor can the Company provide any assurance that it will be successful in exiting the Chapter 11 process. The Debtors have the exclusive right to propose a plan of reorganization during a 120-day period following the Filing Date. The plan will address the continued operations and all other pre-petition obligations of the Debtors. It is currently impossible to predict with any degree of certainty how pre-petition claims will be treated or if the plan of reorganization will be approved

B-4

by the Company’s creditors. The Company intends to address its plan for continued operations and all other pre-petition claims in a plan of reorganization. Prior to the Filing Date, the Company negotiated the salient terms of a plan of reorganization with certain key lenders under the Senior Secured Credit Facility. The Company’s current proposal for the plan of reorganization reflects:

There can be no assurance, however, that the Company’s proposal will be implemented, or that the Company’s creditors will not propose substantial changes to the Company’s proposal.

RESTRUCTURING ACTIVITY

The Company continues to implement cost reduction programs aimed at aligning its ongoing operating costs with its expected revenues. At the end of fiscal 2003, the Company’s headcount was approximately 2,840 (down from 4,973 at the beginning of fiscal 2003). Based on current estimates of its revenues and operating profitability and losses, the Company plans to take additional and significant cost reduction actions.

Throughout fiscal 2003, the Company implemented restructuring plans and recorded $50.6 million of restructuring charges related to continued efforts to align costs with the reduced level of revenues, including $49.7 million in the Company’s communication test segment and $.9 million in the Company’s industrial computing and communications segment. In total, these cost reduction plans included: (1) the reduction of approximately 1,910 jobs worldwide; (2) the reduction of expenditures on outside contractors and consultants; (3) the closure of certain facilities resulting from consolidating certain manufacturing, sales and marketing offices; (4) the reduction of manufacturing costs through procurement programs to lower material costs; and (5) the reduction of other operating expenses.

During fiscal 2003, the Company paid approximately $53.4 million in severance, facilities and other related costs. At March 31, 2003, approximately $11.4 million was left to be paid for the restructuring programs which includes $11.2 million in the Company’s communications test segment and $.2 million in the Company’s industrial computing and communications segment. The Company anticipates that this balance will be paid primarily during the first half of fiscal 2004.

A summary of restructuring actions taken during fiscal 2003 and fiscal 2002 are outlined as follows:

B-5

DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS

In August 2002, the Company divested its Airshow subsidiary. The Company has accounted for this business as a discontinued operation in accordance with SFAS No. 144, and accordingly, the results of operations of this business have been segregated from continuing operations and reported within income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax in the Consolidated Statements of Operations for all periods presented (See Note S. Discontinued Operations to the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements).

In May 2000, the Board of Directors approved a plan to divest the industrial computing and communications business segment. This segment consisted of the Company’s ICS Advent and Itronix Corporation subsidiaries. In October 2001, the Company divested its ICS Advent subsidiary (See Note E. Acquisitions and Divestitures to the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements) but did not divest the Itronix business. As a result, the Company was required to make certain reclassifications to its Consolidated Statements of Operations to include the results of operations of ICS Advent and Itronix within continuing operations. The Consolidated Balance Sheets as of March 31, 2003 and 2002 includes the assets and liabilities of Itronix; however, they were not impacted by ICS Advent, which was disposed of during October 2001. The Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows was not reclassified as this statement was not previously presented on a discontinued basis.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Acterna’s significant accounting policies are presented within Note D.Summary of Significant Accounting Policies to the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements. While all the accounting policies impact the financial statements, certain policies may be viewed to be critical. These policies are those that are most important to the portrayal of the Company’s financial condition and results of operations and also require management’s most difficult, subjective or complex judgments and estimates. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Management believes the policies that fall within this category are the policies on revenue recognition, receivables, inventory, long-lived assets, income tax, pension plans and warranty.

Revenue Recognition

The Company derives revenue, principally, from the sale of products. The Company recognizes revenue when it is earned, which is determined to be when it has persuasive evidence of an arrangement; the product has been shipped or the services have been provided to the customer; title and the risk of loss have been transferred to the customer; the sales price is fixed or determinable; and collectability is reasonably assured.

Revenue on long-term contracts is recognized using the completed contract basis or the percentage of completion basis, as appropriate. Profit estimates on long-term contracts are revised periodically based on changes in estimates of costs to be incurred, and any losses on contracts are recognized in the period that such losses become known. Generally, the terms of long-term contracts provide for progress billing based upon the completion of defined phases of work.

Revenue from software sales is generally recognized upon delivery provided that a contract has been executed, there are no uncertainties regarding customer acceptance and that collection of the related receivable is probable. When significant post-delivery obligations exist, revenue is deferred until such obligations are fulfilled.

Revenue recognition involves judgment and assessments of expected returns, the likelihood of nonpayment and estimates of expected costs and profits on long-term contracts. The Company analyzes various factors, including a review of specific transactions, historical experience, credit-worthiness of customers and current market and economic conditions in determining when to recognize revenue.

Receivables

Accounts receivable and notes receivable are evaluated based upon the credit-worthiness of customers and the age of historical balances and historical experience. The Company maintains an allowance for doubtful accounts for estimated losses resulting from the inability of its customers to make required payments. The allowance was $5.4 million and $7.1 million as of March 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively.

Inventory

Inventory values are stated at the lower of cost or market. Cost is determined based on a currently adjusted standard basis, which approximates actual cost on a first-in, first-out basis. The Company’s inventory includes raw materials, work in process, finished goods and demonstration equipment. The Company periodically reviews its recorded inventory and estimates a reserve for obsolete or slow-moving items. The Company reserves the entire value of all obsolete items. The

B-6

Company determines excess inventory based upon current and forecasted usage, and a reserve is provided for the excess inventory. Such estimates are difficult to make under current economic conditions. If actual demand and market conditions are less favorable than those projected by management, additional reserves may be required. If actual market conditions are more favorable than anticipated, cost of sales will be lower than expected in that period.

Long-Lived Assets

Property, plant and equipment, goodwill, intangible assets, and other long-lived assets are evaluated based upon various factors, including the expected period during which the asset will be utilized, forecasted cash flows, changes in technology and customer demand. The Company assesses impairment of long-lived assets whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable. Factors the Company considers in assessing the impairment of long-lived assets include, but are not limited to, the following:

When the Company determines that the carrying value of long-lived assets may not be recoverable based upon the existence of one or more of the above indicators of impairment, the Company measures impairment based on one of two methods. For assets related to ongoing operations, the Company uses a projected cash flow method to determine if impairment exists and then measures impairment using discounted cash flows. For assets to be disposed of and goodwill, the Company assesses the fair value of the asset based on current market condition for similar assets. If the Company determines that any of the impairment indicators exist, and these assets are determined to be impaired, an adjustment to write down the long-lived assets is charged to income in the period in which the determination was made.

Income Tax

The Company is required to estimate its income taxes in each of the jurisdictions in which it operates. This process involves estimating the Company’s actual current tax obligations together with assessing differences resulting from the different treatment of items for tax and accounting purposes, which result in deferred tax assets and liabilities. The Company has deferred tax assets and liabilities included within its Consolidated Balance Sheets. The Company’s deferred tax assets are assessed for each reporting period as to whether it is more likely than not that they will be recovered from future taxable income. To the extent the Company believes that recovery is less than likely, the Company must establish a valuation allowance for assets not expected to be recovered. Changes to the valuation allowance are included as an expense or benefit within the tax provision in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. In the event that actual results differ from these estimates, the Company’s provision for income taxes could be materially impacted.

Pension Plans

Pension assets and liabilities are determined on an actuarial basis and are affected by the estimated market value of plan assets, estimates of the expected return on plan assets, discount rates and other assumptions relating to estimates of future salary costs and employee service lives, inherent in these valuations. The Company annually reviews the assumptions underlying the actuarial calculations and makes changes to these assumptions based on the current market conditions as necessary. Actual changes in the fair market value of plan assets and differences between the actual return on plan assets and the expected return on plan assets will affect the amount of pension income or expense ultimately recognized.

Warranty

The Company accrues for warranty costs at the time of shipment, based on estimates of expected rework rates and warranty costs to be incurred. While the Company engages in product quality programs and processes, the Company’s warranty obligation is affected by product failure rates, material usage and service delivery costs. Should actual product failure rates, material usage or service delivery costs differ from the Company’s estimates, the amount of actual warranty costs could differ from the Company’s estimates. The Company’s warranty period ranges from 90 days to three years.

B-7

SEASONALITY

As a result of purchasing patterns of the Company’s telecommunications customers, which tend to place large orders periodically, typically during the third quarter and at the end of the Company’s fourth fiscal quarter, the Company expects that its results of operations may vary on a quarterly basis, as they have in the past.

PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT

For the years ended March 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001, the Company invested approximately $104.7 million, $149.7 million and $157.8 million, respectively, in product development activities, respectively.

The market for the Company’s products and services is characterized by rapidly changing technologies such as new and evolving industry standards, protocols, product and service introductions, and enhancements that may render the Company’s existing offerings obsolete or unmarketable. Automation in addressed markets for communications test equipment or a shift in customer emphasis from employee-operated communications testing to automated testing and monitoring systems could likewise render the Company’s existing product offerings obsolete or unmarketable, or reduce the size of one or more of its addressed markets. In particular, incorporation of self-testing functions in the equipment currently addressed by the Company’s communications test instruments could render product offerings redundant and unmarketable. The development of new, technologically advanced products is a complex and uncertain process requiring the accurate anticipation of technological and market trends and the incurrence of substantial research and development costs.

FINANCIAL PARTNERSHIPS

The Company does not have any financial partnerships with unconsolidated entities, such as entities often referred to as structured finance or special purpose entities, which are often established for the purpose of facilitating off-balance sheet arrangements or other contractually narrow or limited purposes. Accordingly, the Company is not exposed to any financing, liquidity, market or credit risk that could arise if the Company had such relationships.

ACQUISITIONS AND DISPOSITIONS

Acquisitions During Fiscal 2001

Wavetek Wandel Goltermann, Inc.

On May 23, 2000, the Company merged one of its wholly owned subsidiaries with WWG for consideration of $402.0 million, which included $14.2 million of acquisition costs. In connection with the WWG Merger, the Company refinanced certain of its debt and entered into a new Senior Secured Credit Facility (See Note K. Note Payable and Debt to the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements). The WWG Merger was accounted for using the purchase method of accounting. As part of a fair value exercise, the Company increased the carrying value of acquired inventory by $35 million in order to record the inventory at its fair value, increased the carrying value of acquired land and buildings by $27 million to record them at fair value, and determined the fair value of acquired incomplete technology to be $51 million. This acquired incomplete technology had not reached technological feasibility, had no alternative future use and was written off in the Consolidated Statements of Operations during fiscal 2001. The WWG Merger generated approximately $488.9 million of excess purchase price which was allocated to other intangibles on a basis as follows: $162.2 million to core technology (which was being amortized over six years), $45.2 million to workforce (which was being amortized over five years prior to adoption of SFAS No. 142, as discussed below), and $6.8 million to backlog (which was amortized over 12 months). The unallocated excess purchase price, or goodwill, of $274.8 million was being amortized over six years. As of April 1, 2001, the Company adopted SFAS No. 142, and all amounts previously allocated to workforce have been reclassified to goodwill, and amortization of goodwill was ceased.

Superior Electronics Group, Inc., doing business as Cheetah Technologies

On August 23, 2000, the Company acquired Cheetah Technologies (“Cheetah”) for a purchase price of $171.5 million. The acquisition was accounted for using the purchase method of accounting. As part of a fair value exercise, the Company increased the carrying value of the acquired inventory by $0.8 million to reflect its fair value and determined the fair value of acquired incomplete technology to be $5.0 million. This acquired incomplete technology had not reached technological feasibility, had no alternative future use and was written off in the Consolidated Statements of Operations during the year. The acquisition generated approximately $143.9 million of excess purchase price, which was allocated to other intangibles as follows: $48.3 million to core technology (which was being amortized over six years), $3.9 million to workforce (which was being amortized over five years prior to adoption of SFAS No. 142, as discussed below), $3.3 million to backlog (which was

B-8

amortized over 12 months), and $0.7 million to trademarks (which are being amortized over 6 years). The unallocated excess purchase price or goodwill of $87.7 million was being amortized over six years. As of April 1, 2001, the Company adopted SFAS No. 142 and all amounts previous allocated to workforce have been reclassified to goodwill, and amortization of goodwill was ceased.

The Company funded the purchase price with borrowings of $100 million under its Senior Secured Credit Facility (See Note K. Notes Payable and Debt to the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements) and approximately $65.7 million from its existing cash balances.

In connection with the Cheetah acquisition, options to purchase shares of Cheetah were converted into options to purchase shares of Acterna common stock. The fair value as of the announcement date of the acquisition of all options converted was $5.8 million using an option-pricing model. A total of $6.7 million relates to the unearned intrinsic value of unvested options as of the closing date of the acquisition, and has been recorded as deferred compensation to be amortized over the remaining vesting period of the options. The weighted average vesting period is approximately three years.

Divestitures During Fiscal 2003

During fiscal 2003, the Company divested certain of its wireless communication test assets to Wiltek Communications GmbH (“Wiltek”) in exchange for total consideration of $12.4 million which was to be paid over a period of eighteen months. On March 31, 2003, the Company received a payment of $4.9 million in cash from a third party. The $4.9 million payment represented the remaining amount due the Company from Wiltek and settlement of accounts receivable. Wiltek was treated as a consolidated subsidiary of the communications test segment until August 2002, at which time the Company received the final installment of the initial consideration. The remaining amounts due from Wiltek were previously written off. As a result, the Company recorded a $2.8 million pre-tax gain on this transaction.

On March 20, 2003, as part of Acterna’s continuing efforts to reduce expenses, Acterna entered into a purchase and sale agreement with Noser Services AG (“Noser”) for the sale of certain of Acterna’s wireless assets. To induce Noser to assume liabilities and obligations to certain customers, Acterna paid Noser approximately $4.2 million, which is included in the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flow as an outflow from operating activities during fiscal 2003. Acterna retained certain customer contracts and accounts receivable which the Company will collect from the customers based on the ongoing performance of Noser. As a result of this divestiture, Acterna expects to achieve cost savings in fiscal 2004.

On February 13, 2003, the Company entered into a purchase and sale agreement with Tollgrade Communications, Inc., for certain assets of its communications test business (“Status Monitoring and Performance”) for a total purchase price of $14.3 million, plus an additional $2.4 million which is subject to a contingent payment obligation based upon the achievement of certain performance obligations. As a result, the Company recorded a pre-tax gain of $10.1 million during fiscal 2003.

On August 9, 2002, the Company consummated the sale of Airshow to Rockwell Collins, Inc., for $157.4 million in cash, net of fees and expenses of $2.6 million. The Company recorded a pre-tax gain on this transaction of $126 million, which reflects the proceeds received by the Company in excess of $28.5 million net assets disposed, a $2.0 million purchase price adjustment and a $0.9 million reimbursement of certain payables which were paid to Rockwell Collins during the third quarter of fiscal 2003. The Company used $153.5 million of the net proceeds to repay a portion of its outstanding debt, including (i) repayment of $128.5 million of Senior Secured Credit Facility term loan borrowings and (ii) transaction costs of $1.6 million and for other corporate purposes. Concurrently with the consummation of the sale of Airshow, the Company retired $106.3 million in principal amount of its 9.75% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2008 for cash consideration of $220 for each $1,000 principal amount of notes tendered, and all accrued interest due thereon. (See Note C. Related Party to the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements).

Divestitures During Fiscal 2002 and 2001

On October 31, 2001, the Company sold its ICS Advent subsidiary for $23 million in cash proceeds. (See Note E. Acquisitions and Divestitures to the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements). The Company wrote down the net assets of ICS Advent at September 30, 2001 to the cash to be received less expenses related to the sale, which resulted in an impairment charge of $15 million in the Statements of Operations during fiscal 2001.

In addition, the Company recorded a charge of $2.9 million relating to the disposition of a subsidiary of Itronix during the second quarter of fiscal 2002.

B-9

In June 2000, the Company sold the assets and liabilities of DataViews Corporation (“DataViews”), a subsidiary that manufactures software for graphical-user-interface applications, to GE Fanuc for $3.5 million. The sale generated a loss of approximately $0.1 million. Prior to the sale, the results of DataViews were included in the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements within “Corporate and Other Subsidiaries.”

Other Acquisitions and Divestitures

The Company has, in the normal course of business, entered into acquisitions and divestitures of small companies or businesses that, in the aggregate, do not have a material impact on the financial results of the Company.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Fiscal 2003 Compared to Fiscal 2002 on a Consolidated Basis

Net Sales. For the fiscal year ended March 31, 2003 net sales decreased $387.3 million or 36.3% to $680.3 million as compared to $1.07 billion for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2002. The decrease was primarily attributable to continued overall economic weakness and a severe downturn in the telecommunications industry, resulting in a significant decrease in network build-outs and capital spending. The Company experienced significant decreases in all three of its segments during fiscal 2003.

International net sales (defined as sales originating outside of the United States) were $332.5 million or 49% of consolidated net sales for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2003, as compared to $463.5 million or 43% of consolidated net sales for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2002. The decrease in international net sales was due to the economic weakness and the downturn described above.

Gross Profit. Consolidated gross profit decreased $254.7 million to $301.7 million or 44.4% of consolidated net sales for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2003, as compared to $556.4 million or 52.1% of net sales for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2002. The reduction in gross profit was primarily due to the reduction of net sales and the impact of $22.2 million of inventory charges. The decreased gross profit as a percentage of net sales is due to pricing pressures and a relative increase in lower margin Itronix product sales, as compared to the higher margin communication test products. The $22.2 million of inventory charges consist of $15.6 million associated with increased inventory reserves and $6.6 million of purchase commitment reserves.

Operating Expenses. Operating expenses consist of selling, general and administrative expense; product development expense; amortization of intangibles; restructuring expenses; impairment of other assets held for sale, goodwill and acquired intangible assets, recapitalization and other related costs; and purchased incomplete technology. Total operating expenses were $846.5 million or 124.4% of net sales for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2003, as compared to $825.5 million or 77.3% of net sales for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2002. Excluding the impact of $397.9 million of asset impairment charges, $50.6 million of restructuring charges, $14.4 million of stock compensation charges and $1.0 million of intangible amortization, adjusted operating expenses were $382.5 million or 56.2% of net sales for the year ended March 31, 2003. On a comparable basis, excluding the impact of $173.2 million of asset impairments charges, $32.0 million of restructuring charges, $17.5 million of stock compensation expense and $42.0 million of intangible amortization, adjusted operating expenses for fiscal 2002 were $560.8 million or 52.5% of net sales. On an adjusted basis, operating expenses decreased by 31.6% or $176.9 million in fiscal 2003, primarily as a result of the divestitures of ICS Advent and Airshow and cost reduction efforts to align selling general and administrative and product development costs to the reduced level of revenues. These cost savings were partially offset by increased corporate administrative costs that resulted from the increased costs of insurance and external consultation associated with the implementation and design of restructuring activities.

Amortization of unearned compensation relates to the issuance of non-qualified stock options to employees and non-employee directors at an exercise price less than the closing price in the public market on the date of issuance. In October 2000, the Company ceased granting options with a strike price less than the fair market value of the underlying stock. The amortization of unearned compensation expense during fiscal 2003 was $15.5 million and has been allocated to cost of sales ($1.1 million), product development expense ($3.8 million), and selling, general and administrative expense ($10.6 million). The $18.8 million amortization expense during fiscal 2002 was allocated to cost of sales ($1.3 million), product development expense ($3.9 million) and selling, general and administrative expense ($13.6 million).

Selling, General and Administrative Expense. Selling, general and administrative expense was $292.3 million or 43.0% of net sales for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2003, as compared to $428.5 million or 40.2% of net sales for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2002. The $136.2 million decrease is primarily a result of $9.0 million of reductions related to the fiscal 2002 divestitures of ICS Advent (See Note E. Acquisitions and Divestitures to the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements), $23.0 million related to non-recurring fiscal 2002 charges associated with the implementation of

B-10

enhanced systems and $104.2 million primarily associated with the benefits of several cost reduction programs. The cost reduction programs were partially offset by increased corporate administrative costs that resulted from the increased costs of insurance and external consultation associated with the implementation and design of restructuring activities.

Product Development Expense. Product development expense was $104.7 million or 15.4% of consolidated net sales for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2003 as compared to $149.7 million or 14.0% of consolidated net sales for the same period a year ago. The reduced product development expense results from the implementation of cost reduction efforts aimed at aligning costs with the reduced level of revenues, and $3.1 million of reductions related to the divestiture of ICS Advent.

Goodwill Impairment. During fiscal 2002, upon adoption of SFAS No. 142, the Company completed its transitional test of goodwill impairment, which resulted in no impairment charge. During fiscal 2003, the Company, as a result of increasingly unfavorable market conditions, revised its long-term financial forecast projections to reflect future declines in results of operations. Based on this revision of the long-term debt outlook, the Company, assisted by independent valuation consultants, completed an assessment of the carrying amount of goodwill in the communications test segment, as required by SFAS No. 142. The results of the impairment analysis, which were derived by utilizing, among other methods, a discounted cash flow analysis and an analysis of other market comparables, indicated that the carrying amount of goodwill within the communications test segment exceeded its estimated far value. Accordingly, the Company recorded an impairment charge of $374.2 million in the second quarter of fiscal 2003. This charge was recorded within the communications test segment and has been included in the impairment charge in the Statement of Operations. (See Note H. Goodwill to the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements.)

Asset Impairment. During fiscal 2002, as part of the annual impairment analysis, management performed an assessment of the carrying values of long-lived assets within the communications test segment. This assessment, based on estimated undiscounted future cash flows of the segment, indicated that long-lived assets were impaired. The Company discounted cash flows to determine the amount of the impairment, and, as a result, recorded a pre-tax charge of $151.3 million during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2002. (See Note G. Acquired Intangible Assets to the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements.)

Amortization of Intangibles. Amortization of intangibles was $1.0 million for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2003 as compared to $42.0 million for the same period a year ago. The decrease was primarily attributable to the write-off of $151.3 million of impaired intangible assets during fiscal 2002, which resulted in a reduced amount of amortizable assets during fiscal 2003.

Interest. Interest expense, net of interest income, was $72.5 million for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2003 as compared to $95.0 million for the same period a year ago. The decrease in net interest expense during fiscal 2003 as compared to fiscal 2002 is primarily a result of reduced debt, the fair value discount on the Convertible Notes and a lower weighted average interest rate.

Other Income (Expense), net. During fiscal 2003, the Company recorded other income, net of other expense, of $9.7 million principally related to gains associated with the divestiture of the Company’s Status Monitoring and Performance business (See Note E. Acquisitions and Divestitures to the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements), offset partially by losses from foreign currency changes during the year. Other expense of $7.6 million during fiscal 2002 was related principally to fluctuations in foreign currencies.

Taxes. The Company recorded an income tax benefit as part of continuing operations of $51.5 million and $0.2 million for fiscal 2003 and 2002, respectively. The Company was able to recognize an income tax benefit for its loss from continuing operations for fiscal 2003 due to income recognized from the disposition of Airshow and retirement of debt at a discount. (See Note M. Income Taxes to the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements).

The amount recorded for income taxes during both fiscal 2003 and 2002 differ significantly from the amounts that would have been recorded by applying the U.S. federal statutory rate to loss from operations before income taxes. During fiscal 2003, the principal reasons for the difference were: (1) the utilization of U.S. net operating losses in the amount of approximately $70 million for which a valuation allowance had been provided in fiscal 2002, (2) the impairment of non-deductible goodwill, and (3) the recording of a valuation allowance in the amount of approximately $168 million against fiscal 2003 U.S. and foreign net deferred tax assets. During fiscal 2002, the principal reasons for the difference were: (1) the recording of a valuation allowance against the Company’s U.S. net deferred tax assets in the amount of approximately $74 million (2) a provision for U.S. income taxes on unremitted foreign earnings of approximately $40 million, and (3) the carry back of fiscal 2002 U.S. losses for five years.

B-11

As a result of U.S. tax legislation enacted in March 2002, the law allowed increasing the period over which net operating losses may be carried back from two years to five, as such, the Company was able to file claims for refund of approximately $61 million for taxes paid in prior years. The entire refund was collected during the first quarter of fiscal 2003.

Fiscal 2002 Compared to Fiscal 2001 on a Consolidated Basis

Net Sales. For the fiscal year ended March 31, 2002, net sales decreased $219.7 million or 17.1% to $1.07 billion as compared to $1.29 billion for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2001. The decrease was primarily attributable to the global economic slowdown and a severe downturn in the telecommunications industry, resulting in a significant decrease in network build-outs and capital spending. As a result, the Company experienced a significant decrease in revenues from its communication test segment during fiscal 2002. The Company also experienced reduced revenues from its digital color enhancement systems, offset by increased revenues from its Itronix business.

International net sales (defined as sales originating outside of the United States) were $463.5 million or 43% of consolidated net sales for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2002, as compared to $514.6 million or 40.0% of consolidated net sales for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2001. The decrease in international net sales was due to the economic weakness and the downturn described above.

Gross Profit. Consolidated gross profit decreased $156.8 million to $556.4 million or 52.1% of net sales for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2002 as compared to $713.2 million or 55.4% of net sales for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2001. The decrease in gross profit is primarily attributable to the decline in demand within the communications test business coupled with $21.0 million of adjustments in fiscal 2002 related to inventory and supplier commitments, partially offset by a $35.7 million fiscal 2001 charge related to inventory step-up amortization resulting from the acquisitions of WWG and Cheetah. The majority of these adjustments relate to additional inventory charges resulting from reduced expectations of demand and usage.

Operating Expenses. Operating expenses consist of selling, general and administrative expense; product development expense; recapitalization and other related costs; purchased incomplete technology; restructuring charges; impairment of other assets held for sale, goodwill and acquired intangible assets, and amortization of intangibles. Total operating expenses were $825.5 million or 77.3% of net sales for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2002, as compared to $809.1 million or 62.9% of net sales for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2001. The increase during fiscal 2002 as compared to fiscal 2001 is principally due to the impairment of acquired intangibles and other assets of $151.3 million during fiscal 2002 and restructuring charges of $32.0 million, which were offset by non-recurring fiscal 2001 charges of $9.2 million for recapitalization and other charges as well as $56.0 million in write-offs of purchased incomplete technology in fiscal 2001. In addition, intangible amortization expense decreased by $77.2 million (amortization of goodwill ceased on April 1, 2001) during fiscal 2002 as a result of the implementation of SFAS No. 142.

Amortization of unearned compensation relates to the issuance of non-qualified stock options to employees and non-employee directors at an exercise price lower than the closing price in the public market on the date of issuance. In October 2000, the Company ceased granting options with a strike price less than the fair market value of the underlying stock. The amortization of unearned compensation expense during fiscal 2002 was $18.8 million and has been allocated to cost of sales ($1.3 million), product development expense ($3.9 million), and selling, general and administrative expense ($13.6 million). The amortization expense during fiscal 2001 of $19.3 million was allocated to cost of sales ($1.3 million), product development expense ($4.0 million) and selling, general and administrative expense ($14.0 million).

Selling, General and Administrative Expense. Selling, general and administrative expense was $428.5 million or 40.1% of net sales for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2002, as compared to $467.0 million or 36.3% of net sales for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2001. The $38.5 million decrease is primarily a result of the Company’s restructuring efforts in the second half of fiscal 2002 to reduce operating costs of the business as well as a reduction of $9.7 million due to the sale of ICS Advent. Included in these expenses is approximately $23.0 million during fiscal 2002 related to charges for the implementation of enhanced systems and $25.2 million during fiscal 2001 related to the product rebranding and additional consultants hired for the integration of WWG.

Product Development Expense. Product development expense was $149.7 million or 14.0% of net sales for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2002, as compared to $157.8 million or 12.3% of net sales for the same period a year ago.

During 2001, recapitalization and other related costs of $9.2 million related to an executive who left the Company during fiscal 2000. No such costs were incurred during 2002.

B-12

During fiscal 2002, as part of the annual impairment analysis, management performed an assessment of the carrying values of long-lived assets within the communications test segment. This assessment, based on estimated future cash flows of the segment, indicated that long-lived assets were impaired. The Company discounted cash flows to determine the amount of the impairment, and as a result, recorded a pre-tax charge of $151.3 million during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2002. (See Note G. Acquired Intangible Assets, to the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements.)

During fiscal 2002, upon adoption of SFAS No. 142, the Company completed its transitional test of goodwill impairment, which resulted in no impairment charge. (See Note G. Acquired Intangible Assets to the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements.)

Amortization of Intangibles. Amortization of intangibles was $42.0 million for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2002 as compared to $119.2 million for the same period a year ago. The decrease was primarily attributable to the Company’s early adoption of SFAS No, 142 in the first quarter of fiscal 2002, which eliminated the amortization of goodwill for the entire fiscal year.

Interest. Interest expense, net of interest income, was $95.0 million for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2002 as compared to $98.8 million for the same period a year ago. The decrease in net interest expense during fiscal 2002, as compared to fiscal 2001, is primarily a result of decreased interest rates offset partially by a decrease in interest income.

Other expense. During fiscal 2002, the Company incurred other expenses of $7.6 million principally related to losses in connection with changes in foreign currencies. Other expense of $4.5 million during fiscal 2001 was also related principally to changes in foreign currencies.

Taxes. The Company recorded an income tax benefit of $0.2 million and $18.4 million for fiscal 2002 and 2001, respectively. The amounts recorded for income taxes during both fiscal 2002 and 2001 differ significantly from the amounts that would have been expected by applying the U.S. federal statutory tax rate to loss from operations before income taxes. During fiscal 2002, the principal reasons for such differences were: (1) the recording of a valuation allowance against the Company’s U.S. net deferred tax assets in the amount of approximately $74 million; (2) a provision for U.S. income taxes on unremitted foreign earnings of approximately $40 million; and (3) the carryback of fiscal 2002 losses for five years. During fiscal 2001, the principal reasons for the difference between the expected tax rate and the effective tax rate were due to non-deductible goodwill amortization as a result of the WWG Merger and an increase in the amount of income earned in various countries with tax rates higher than the U.S. federal statutory tax rate, primarily Germany.

BUSINESS SEGMENTS

The Company measures the performance of its segments by their respective new orders received (“bookings”), net sales and earnings before interest, taxes, and amortization of intangibles and amortization of unearned compensation (“EBITA”), which excludes non-recurring and one-time charges (See Note T. Segment Information and Geographic Areas to the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements.)

Included in the segment’s EBITA is an allocation of corporate expenses. The information below includes bookings, net sales and EBITA for the Company’s communications test, industrial computing and communications and digital color enhancement systems segments:

B-13

Fiscal 2003 Compared to Fiscal 2002—Communications Test

Bookings for the communications test products decreased 32.1% to $446.4 million in the year ended March 31, 2003, as compared to $657.1 million for the same period a year ago. The decrease is primarily due to the continued economic downturn and capital spending cutbacks within the telecommunications industry.

Sales of communications test products decreased 39.5% to $516.8 million in the year ended March 31, 2003, as compared to $854.4 million for the same period a year ago. The decrease in sales is primarily a result of the downturn in the telecommunications industry and the significant decline in backlog at the end of fiscal 2002. The decline has affected all of the segments’ product lines; however, the most significant was within the optical transport products where decreases were primarily due to reduced capital spending by the Company’s customers. The decrease in net sales during fiscal 2003 was partially offset by approximately $18 million of sales from a previously booked order from one customer.

EBITA for the communications test products decreased to a loss of $70.2 million in the year ended March 31, 2003, as compared to a loss of $3.7 million for the same period a year ago. The significant decline in EBITA resulted from decreased sales, inventory charges, and erosion of gross profit margins, offset partially by the implementation of cost reduction strategies.

As a result of the declining financial performance and reduced expectations for future earnings, management performed an assessment of the carrying value of the long-lived assets within the communications test segment resulting in an impairment of goodwill. As a result, a charge of $374.2 million was recorded during fiscal 2003.

Fiscal 2003 Compared to Fiscal 2002—Industrial Computing and Communications

Bookings for the industrial computing and communications products increased 9.9% to $155.6 million in the year ended March 31, 2003, as compared to $141.5 million for the same period a year ago. Exclusive of ICS Advent, which was disposed of during October fiscal 2002, bookings in the Itronix business increased from $116.8 million in fiscal 2002 to $155.6 million in fiscal 2003. Increased bookings in the Itronix business were due to a competitively priced order from Sears for its Go Book durable notebook products during the second quarter of fiscal 2003.

Net sales of industrial computing and communications products decreased 25.2% to $140.8 million in the year ended March 31, 2003, as compared to $188.4 million for the same period a year ago. Of the $47.6 million decrease in net sales, $35.6 million was due to the disposition of ICS Advent, and $12.0 million was due primarily to a decrease in net sales from the Itronix business. The decrease in sales from the Itronix business is due to overall weakness in the current economy, and from the reduced backlog at the end of fiscal 2002. The decrease in overall Itronix revenues in fiscal 2003 was partially offset by the revenue from the large order with Sears.

EBITA for the industrial computing and communications segment decreased $1.4 million to $3.6 million for fiscal 2003 as compared to $5.0 million for the same period a year ago. The decrease in EBITA results primarily from a decrease in net sales and gross margins at Itronix, offset by $5.7 million of prior year losses from ICS Advent. Excluding the effect of

B-14

ICS Advent for fiscal 2002, EBITA in the Itronix business decreased by $7.1 million to $3.6 million in fiscal 2003, as compared to $10.7 million for the same period a year ago. The decrease in EBITA from the Itronix business is due to reduced sales, inventory charges and reduced gross margins as a result of competitive pricing pressures and the competitively priced order from Sears.

Fiscal 2003 Compared to Fiscal 2002—Digital Color Enhancement Systems

Bookings for da Vinci decreased 3.8% to $22.2 million for the year ended March 31, 2003, as compared to $23.0 million for the same period a year ago. The decrease reflects strong bookings in the first quarter of fiscal 2002, which occurred prior to the impact of the major budgetary cutbacks in the advertising industry, which resulted in reduced capital expenditures for post-production video businesses as the year progressed.

Net sales of da Vinci decreased 8.5% to $22.7 million for the year ended March 31, 2003, as compared to $24.8 million for the same period a year ago. The decrease in sales was most pronounced in Europe.

EBITA for da Vinci increased 17.2% to $7.0 million as compared to $6.0 million for the same period a year ago. The increase in EBITA primarily resulted from increased gross margins and reduced costs associated with cost reduction efforts, partially offset by a decrease in sales during the year. The increase in gross margin during fiscal 2003 was due primarily to inventory charges recorded during fiscal 2002.

Fiscal 2002 Compared to Fiscal 2001—Communications Test

Bookings for the communications test products decreased 47.4% to $657.1 million for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2002, as compared to $1.25 billion for the same period of fiscal 2001. The decrease is primarily due to a global downturn within the telecommunications industry.

Sales of communications test products decreased 18.8% to $854.4 million for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2002, as compared to $1.05 billion for the same period of fiscal 2001. The decrease in sales is primarily a result of the downturn in the telecommunications industry and has affected all of the segments’ product lines.

EBITA for the communications test products decreased to a loss of $3.7 million for fiscal 2002 as compared to income of $139.5 million for the same period of fiscal 2001. The decrease is primarily related to reduced sales and pricing pressures, which were partially offset by reduced operating expenses in the second half of fiscal 2002 as a result of the restructuring actions taken during the year.

As a result of the declining financial performance and reduced expectations for future earnings, management performed an assessment of the carrying value of the long-lived assets within the communications test segment resulting in an impairment of acquired intangible assets (principally core technology). As a result, a charge of $151.3 million was recorded during fiscal 2002.

Fiscal 2002 Compared to Fiscal 2001—Industrial Computing and Communications

Bookings for the industrial computing and communications products decreased $85.1 million or 37.5% to $141.5 million for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2002, as compared to $226.6 million for fiscal 2001. The decrease was primarily due to the disposition of ICS Advent, a division of industrial computing and communications, on October 31, 2001. Excluding the effect of ICS Advent for both fiscal 2002 and 2001, bookings decreased by 11.1% to $116.8 million for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2002, as compared to $131.4 million for the same period of fiscal 2001. The $14.6 million proforma decrease in bookings is primarily related to fewer orders during the first half of the fiscal year.

Net sales of industrial computing and communications products decreased 5.1% to $188.4 million for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2002, as compared to $198.4 million for fiscal 2001. The decrease in net sales was primarily due to the disposition of ICS Advent and was offset in part by an increase in net sales from the Itronix business. Excluding the effect of ICS Advent for both fiscal 2002 and 2001, net sales increased by 34.9% to $152.7 million for the year ended March 31, 2002, as compared to $113.2 million for the same period of fiscal 2001. The $39.5 million proforma increase in net sales is from the Itronix business and is primarily due to shipments of Itronix’ new rugged laptop PC product, Go Book.

EBITA for the industrial computing and communications segment increased $6.9 million to $5.0 million for fiscal 2002 as compared to a loss of $1.9 million for fiscal 2001. The increase in EBITA results primarily from an increase in net sales at Itronix, offset by increased losses at ICS Advent. Excluding the effect of ICS Advent for both fiscal 2002 and 2001, EBITA increased by $10.0 million to $10.7 million for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2002, as compared to $0.7 million for fiscal 2001.

B-15

Fiscal 2002 Compared to Fiscal 2001—Digital Color Enhancement Systems

Bookings for da Vinci decreased 31.6% to $23.0 million for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2002, as compared to $33.7 million for fiscal 2001. The decrease related primarily to the reduction of advertising budgets within the industry, which indirectly drives the capital expenditure for post-production video businesses. This decrease became more pronounced in the second half of the fiscal year with the general downturn in the economy.

Net sales of da Vinci decreased 29.7% to $24.8 million for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2002, as compared to $35.3 million for fiscal 2001. The decrease in sales was due to the factors described above causing a reduction in sales of da Vinci’s products.

EBITA for da Vinci decreased 45.3% to $6.0 million as compared to $10.9 million for fiscal 2001. The decrease in EBITA primarily resulted from the $10.5 million decrease in sales for fiscal 2002 as compared to fiscal 2001 and was offset by reduced operating expenses in fiscal 2002.

DEBT, CAPITAL RESOURCES AND LIQUIDITY

The Company’s liquidity needs arise primarily from debt service on the substantial indebtedness incurred in connection with the WWG Merger, Cheetah acquisition, the recent and significant operating losses recorded as well as funding the Company’s on-going operations. Due to the Company’s voluntary Chapter 11 bankruptcy filing on May 6, 2003, (the “Filing”) and the failure to pay accrued interest on March 31, 2003, the Company is in default on substantially all of its debt obligations. As of March 31, 2003, the Company had $958.2 million of indebtedness, primarily consisting of $168.7 million principal amount of 9.75% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2008 (the “Senior Subordinated Notes”), $672.8 million in borrowings under the Company’s Senior Secured Credit Facility, $83.2 million principal amount of 12% of Senior Secured Convertible Note due 2007 (the “Convertible Notes”) and $33.5 million of other debt obligations. The working capital balances of the Company at March 31, 2003 are expected to continue at similar levels for the foreseeable future.

During the second quarter of fiscal 2003, upon the consummation of the sale of Airshow, the Company used $153 million of the net proceeds to repay a portion of its outstanding debt and for other corporate purposes. Concurrent with the sale of Airshow the Company completed a tender offer resulting in the purchase and retirement of Senior Subordinated Notes having an aggregate principal of $106.3 million for $220 per $1,000 of principal.

During the fourth quarter of the fiscal year ended March 31, 2002, new U.S. tax legislation was enacted which increased the period over which net operating losses may be carried back from two years to five. Consistent with these new standards, the Company filed claims for a refund of approximately $61 million for taxes paid in prior years. The entire refund was collected during the first quarter of fiscal 2003.

The following table lists the future payments for debt, operating leases and purchase obligations: (In thousands)

While the Company has issued purchase orders to suppliers for deliveries in the future, due to the bankruptcy filing, certain of these purchase orders are governed by executory contracts which the Debtors may choose to reject. In addition, certain suppliers may require new purchase orders to be issued post Filing. Therefore, the Company elected to omit information on future purchase obligations as it would be misleading.

B-16

As of March 31, 2003 the Company had $57.6 million in cash. After March 31, 2003, the Company depends upon its ability to generate cash flows from operations and sell non-strategic assets to fund operations. The history of operating losses, the Company’s recent Filing and its impact on operations, the continued downturn in the communications test market, the costs of professionals in the Chapter 11 cases and the costs of restructuring, all raise substantial doubt about the Company liquidity. The Company has made significant cost reductions during fiscal 2003 and 2002 and has identified the need for further reductions in light of the continued downturn in the marketplace. However, the costs associated with the implementation of these reductions, combined with the costs of the Filing and ongoing operations are substantial. In the event that cash flow from operations or the sale of non-strategic assets is insufficient to fund these costs, the Company will have to access the DIP facility.

The DIP facility is a borrowing base facility that fluctuates based on the cash on hand, amount of eligible accounts receivable and inventory of the Debtors. Upon the successful sale of certain non-core assets of the Company, an additional amount under the DIP facility would become available to the Debtors as well. In the event the Company is not successful in selling certain non-core assets, the Debtors would not have full access to the $30 million facility. It is unlikely that the Company would have access to alternative financing sources, which could result in the Company being unable to fund ongoing operations. In such event, the Company could face liquidation. See “Factors That May Affect Future Results.”

Convertible Notes

On December 4, 2002, CDR Fund VI reinvested $2.8 million in interest, net of taxes, it received from the Company on the Senior Subordinates Notes. The reinvestment was in the form of a new Convertible Note with identical terms as the note issued in January 2002.

On January 15, 2002, Acterna LLC issued and sold at par $75 million aggregate principal amount of the Convertible Notes to CDR Fund VI. As of March 31, 2003, the Company was in default as a result of a cross default from its failure to pay interest on the Senior Secured Credit Facility as of March 31, 2003.

Interest on the Convertible Notes is payable semi-annually in arrears on each March 31^st and September 30^th. Interest payments commenced on March 31, 2002. At the option of Acterna LLC, interest is payable in cash or in-kind by the issuance of additional Convertible Notes. During fiscal 2003, additional Convertible Notes for the principal amount of $9.6 million were issued for the accrued interest. The Company recorded these notes at their fair market value at the time of issuance, which resulted in a cumulative discount of $6.0 million. The discount is shown as a reduction to interest expense and is being amortized over the life of the Convertible Notes. The Convertible Notes are secured by a second lien on all of the assets of the Company and its subsidiaries that secure the Senior Secured Credit Facility and are guaranteed by the Company and its domestic subsidiaries.

At the option of CDR Fund VI (or any subsequent holder of Convertible Notes), at any time prior to December 31, 2007, the maturity date of the Convertible Notes, the Convertible Notes may be converted into newly-issued shares of common stock of the Company at a conversion price of $3.00 per share, subject to customary anti-dilution adjustments. On the date of issuance, the conversion price of the Convertible Notes exceeded the public market price per share of common stock of the Company. If in the future, any Convertible Note is issued with a conversion price less than the public market price on January 15, 2002 (the date of original issuance) as a result of an anti-dilution adjustment of the conversion price, the Company would be required to record a charge to its results of operations to reflect the discount of the adjusted conversion price to the market price of the common stock on the date of original issuance.

Senior Secured Credit Facility and Amendment to Senior Secured Credit Facility

In connection with the WWG Merger, the Company refinanced a portion of its debt and entered into a Senior Secured Credit Facility with a syndicate of lenders (the “Senior Secured Credit Facility”) that provided for term loans and a revolving credit facility (the “Revolving Credit Facility”). As of March 31, 2003, the Company had $522.8 million in term loan borrowings, $150.0 million in revolving credit borrowings and $17 million of outstanding letters of credit under the Senior Secured Credit Facility. Prior to March 31, 2003, the Company was in compliance with the covenants under the Senior Secured Credit Facility; however, as a result of its failure to pay interest due on March 31, 2003 it was in default.

Interest on the loans outstanding under the Senior Secured Credit Facility is payable quarterly in arrears on each June 30, September 30, December 31 and March 31 through maturity. The loans under the Senior Secured Credit Facility bear interest at floating rates based upon the interest rate option elected by the Company. To fix interest charged on a portion of its debt, the Company entered into interest rate hedge agreements. After giving effect to these hedge agreements, $130 million of the Company’s debt was subject to an effective average annual fixed rate of 5.7% per annum until September

B-17

2002. Taking into account its interest rate swap agreement, the annual weighted-average interest rate on the loans under the Company’s Senior Secured Credit Facility was 5.8% and 6.7% for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively. Due to the recent reduction in interest rates, the Company’s 90-day LIBOR borrowing rate (plus the applicable margin) was 5.2% at March 31, 2003. The obligations of the Company under the Senior Secured Credit Facility are guaranteed by each direct and indirect U.S. subsidiary of the Company. The obligations under the Senior Secured Credit Facility are secured by a pledge of the equity interests in Acterna LLC, by substantially all of the assets of Acterna LLC and each direct or indirect U.S. subsidiary of Acterna LLC, by a pledge of the capital stock of each such direct or indirect U.S. subsidiary, and 65% of the capital stock of each subsidiary of the Company that acts as a holding company of the Company’s foreign subsidiaries.

The Company is also required to pay a commitment fee based on the unused amount of the Revolving Credit Facility. This rate is an annual rate, paid quarterly, and ranges from 0.30% to 0.50%, and it is based on the Company’s leverage ratio in effect at the beginning of each quarter. The Company paid $0.2 million and $0.2 million in fiscal 2003 and 2002, respectively, in commitment fees.

During July 2002, the Company reached an agreement with its lenders regarding amendments to its Senior Secured Credit Facility. Under the amendments, which became effective on August 7, 2002, the lenders, among other things, approved the sale of Airshow to Rockwell Collins and agreed to certain changes to financial covenants in the Revolving Credit Facility. As part of this agreement, the minimum liquidity requirement of $25 million at the end of each quarter will remain the same; however, the minimum cumulative EBITDA covenants (as defined in the Senior Secured Credit Facility) have been modified as follows: negative $40 million for the two quarters ended September 2002; negative $17 million for the three quarters ended December 2002; and $0 for the four quarters ending March 2003. In addition, the lenders permitted the Company to use up to $24 million to purchase a portion of its 9.75% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2008 pursuant to the combined tender offers. (See Note C. Related Party to the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements).

Senior Subordinated Notes

In connection with the 1998 recapitalization of the Company, the Company issued the Senior Subordinated Notes. Interest on the Senior Subordinated Notes accrues at the rate of 9.75% per annum and is payable semi-annually in arrears on each May 15^th and November 15^th through maturity in 2008. As of March 31, 2003, the Company was in default of the covenants under the Senior Subordinated Notes due to a cross-default caused by its failure to pay interest on the Senior Secured Credit Facility due on March 31, 2003.

On June 24, 2002, Acterna LLC, along with CD&R VI (Barbados) commenced cash tender offers, as amended, for up to $155 million, on a combined basis, in principal amount of its outstanding 9.75% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2008. The tender offers provided for cash consideration of $220 in exchange for each $1,000 principal amount of notes tendered, and all accrued interest due thereon. These combined tender offers expired on August 12, 2002 and resulted in the purchase and retirement of notes having an aggregate principal value of $106.3 million by Acterna LLC and the purchase of notes having an aggregate principal value of $43 million by CD&R Barbados. In connection with these combined tender offers, Acterna LLC granted CD&R Barbados the right (which CD&R Barbados agreed to exercise only at the request of the administration agent under the Senior Secured Credit Facility) to invest all future cash interest received, on an after tax basis, on all the Senior Subordinated Notes held by CD&R Barbados in new senior secured convertible notes of Acterna LLC. The new notes that will be issued upon such reinvestment will have terms substantially similar to the 12% Senior Secured Convertible Notes due 2007 issued to CDR Fund VI in January 2002 except that the interest rate and conversion rate applicable to any series of new notes will be determined at the time of issuance. During December 2002, in connection with an interest payment on the senior subordinated notes by Acterna, LLC, CD&R Barbados exercised this right to invest $2.8 million of its after-tax interest proceeds in newly issued senior secured convertible notes of Acterna LLC due 2007. Interest on these notes is to be paid semi-annually, in arrears, at a rate of 12% per annum. These notes have a conversion rate of 2,273 shares of common stock per $1,000 of principal. CD&R Barbados is a Barbados company, all of the capital stock of which is owned by CDR Fund VI. It is currently impossible to predict with any degree of certainty how pre-petition claims would be treated or if the plan of reorganization will be approved by the creditors. However, it is likely that the value of the Senior Subordinated Notes will be substantially impaired under the plan of reorganization.

Capital Resources

Cash Flows. The Company’s cash and cash equivalents increased $14.8 million to $57.6 million during the fiscal year ended March 31, 2003.

Working Capital. For the fiscal year ended March 31, 2003, the Company’s net working capital decreased as its operating assets and liabilities provided $64.6 million of cash. Accounts receivable decreased, creating a source of cash of

B-18

$38.2 million, primarily due to the decrease in sales during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2003 as compared to the same period in 2002 as well as reduction in days sales outstanding due to more effective collections. Inventory levels decreased by $30.2 million, due in part to the efforts to control costs and maintain inventory levels in line with expected sales. Other current assets decreased, creating a source of cash of $12.6 million, due primarily to a $61 million refund of previously paid income taxes. Accounts payable decreased $17.5 million as a result of a reduced level of purchases in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2003, as compared to the same period a year ago.

Investing activities. Investing activities produced $158.1 million of cash for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2003, due to $178.4 million of net proceeds from the divestitures of businesses and $2.9 million in proceeds from the sale of property and equipment offset by $23.2 million of capital expenditures.

Debt and equity. The Company’s financing activities used $80.9 million in cash during fiscal 2003, due to the pre-payment of $171.1 million of long-term debt and repayment of bank overdrafts, offset by $87.0 million of new borrowings under the Revolving Credit Facility. The Company also received $3.2 million associated with capital lease proceeds, net of capital lease payments, during fiscal 2003.

On May 6, 2003, the Company obtained a debtor-in-possession credit facility (the “DIP facility”) as part of the bankruptcy filing. The DIP facility provides the Company with up to $30 million in available borrowings. The available borrowing base is limited to the Company’s cash, eligible trade receivables, inventory and proceeds from asset sales. The Company has access to the DIP facility only in the event that its cash balance is below $30 million, and it is in compliance with EBITDA and capital expenditure covenants.

FUTURE FINANCING SOURCES AND CASH FLOWS

As of March 31, 2003, the Company was in default and cross default on substantially all of its existing debt obligations as a result of its failure to pay interest on the Senior Secured Credit Facility. As a result, the Company did not have access to any of the additional availability under its Revolving Credit Facility. There were $17 million in letters of credit outstanding and $150 million of borrowings on the Revolving Credit Facility as of March 31, 2003, among others, which had been approved. The Company has access to the DIP facility only in the event that its cash balance falls below $30 million and it is in compliance with the EBITDA and capital expenditures covenants, among others, which has been approved by the Bankruptcy Court.

NEW PRONOUNCEMENTS

In April 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 145, “Rescission of FASB Statements No. 4, 44 and 64, Amendment of FASB Statement No. 13, and Technical Corrections” (“SFAS No. 145”), which rescinds SFAS No. 4, “Reporting Gains and Losses from Extinguishment of Debt”. This statement amends Accounting Principal Board (“APB”) Opinion No. 30 (“APB No. 30”), which required all gains and losses from the extinguishment of debt to be aggregated and, if material, classified as an extraordinary item, net of related income tax effect. As a result, the criteria set forth by the amended APB No. 30 will now be used to classify those gains and losses. SFAS No. 145 also amends SFAS No. 13 to require that certain lease modifications that have economic effects similar to sale-leaseback transactions be accounted for in the same manner as sale-leaseback transactions. In addition, SFAS No. 145 also amends other existing authoritative pronouncements to make various technical corrections, clarify meanings or describe their applicability under changed conditions. The provisions of SFAS No. 145 are effective for fiscal years beginning after May 15, 2002, with early adoption encouraged. Upon adoption of the provisions of SFAS No.145, the Company reclassified the extraordinary items reported during fiscal 2003 into continuing operations.

In July 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 146, “Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities” (“SFAS No. 146”), SFAS No. 146 addresses accounting for costs associated with exit or disposal activities and nullifies Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) Issue No. 94-3 “Liability Recognition for Certain Employee Termination Benefits and Other Costs to Exit an Activity”. This statement is effective for exit or disposal activities that are initiated after December 31, 2002, with early adoption encouraged. The Company does not expect the application of SFAS 146 to have a material impact on its financial position or results of operations.

In November 2002, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 45, “Guarantor’s Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others” (“FIN 45”). FIN45 clarifies the requirements of SFAS No. 5, “Accounting for Contingencies”, relating to the guarantor’s accounting for, and disclosure of the issuance of certain types of guarantees The Company has adopted the disclosure requirements of FIN 45 as of December 31, 2002. (See Note J. Warranty to the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements). The initial recognition of measurement provisions of

B-19

FIN 45 are effective on a prospective basis for guarantees that are issued or modified after December 31, 2002. The Company does not expect the application of FIN 45 to have a material impact on its financial position or results of operation.

In December 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 148, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation Transition and Disclosure, an amendment of SFAS No. 123.” (“SFAS No. 148”) This statement provides alternative methods of transition for a voluntary change to the fair value based method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation. In addition, this statement modifies the disclosure requirements of SFAS No. 123, requiring among other things, increased disclosures within annual and interim financial reports. The provisions of this statement become effective for annual and interim financial reports covering periods beginning after December 15, 2002, with early adoption encouraged. The Company has adopted the disclosure requirements of SFAS No. 148 in the accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements. (See Note P. Stock Compensation Plans to the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements).

In January 2003, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 46, “Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities” (“FIN 46”). FIN 46 is an interpretation of Accounting Research Bulletin (“ARB”) No. 51 “Consolidated Financial Statements” (“ARB 51”). The primary objectives of FIN 46 are to provide guidance on the identification of entities for which control is achieved through means other than through voting rights and how to determine when and which business enterprise should consolidate the variable interest entities. The Company does not have any variable interest entities and therefore does not expect the application of FIN 46 to have an impact on its financial position and results of operations.

In April 2003, the FASB issued SFAS No. 149 “Amendment of Statement 133 on Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities” (“SFAS No. 149”). SFAS No. 149 amends and clarifies financial accounting and reporting for derivative instruments and hedging activities, primarily as a result of decisions made by the FASB Derivatives Implementation Group subsequent to the original issuance of SFAS No. 133 and in connection with other FASB projects. This standard is generally effective prospectively for contracts and hedging relationships entered into or modified after June 30, 2003. The company is currently evaluating the impact of SFAS No. 149.

In May, 2003, the FASB issued SFAS No. 150, “Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Characteristics of Both Liabilities and Equity” (“SFAS No. 150”). This standard improves the accounting for certain financial instruments that issuers previously accounted for as equity, requiring such instruments to be classified as liabilities in certain situations. SFAS No. 150 is effective for all financial instruments entered into or modified after May 31, 2003 and for interim periods beginning after June 15, 2003. The Company does not expect its adoption of SFAS No. 150 in fiscal 2004 to have a material impact on its financial position or results of operations.

QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

The Company sells its products in over 80 countries. The Company is subject to business risks inherent in non-U.S. activities, including political and economic uncertainty, import and export limitations, and market risk related to changes in interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates. The Company believes the political and economic risks related to its foreign operations are mitigated due to the stability of the countries in which its facilities are located. The Company’s principal currency exposures against the U.S. dollar are in the Euro, British Pound and Australian dollar. The Company uses foreign currency forward exchange contracts to mitigate fluctuations in currency. The Company’s market risk exposure to currency rate fluctuations is not material. The Company does not hold derivatives for trading purposes.

The Company uses derivative financial instruments consisting primarily of interest rate hedge agreements to manage exposures to interest rate changes. The Company’s objective in managing its exposure to changes in interest rates (on its variable rate debt) is to limit the impact of such changes on earnings and cash flow and to lower its overall borrowing costs. At March 31, 2003, the Company had a $2.8 million interest rate swap contract maturing on March 5, 2004. The swap was initiated to hedge floating debt that was denominated in the German mark. The interest expense impact for fiscal 2003 is not material. In addition, the Company had an interest rate swap contract, which expired during the second quarter of fiscal 2003. The swap contract that expired had fixed interest rates higher than the three-month LIBOR quoted by financial institutions. The Company therefore recognized an increase in interest expense (calculated as the difference between the interest rate in the swap contracts and the three-month LIBOR rates) for the first six months of fiscal 2003 of $2.5 million.

At March 31, 2003, the Company had $672.8 million of variable rate debt outstanding which represents approximately 70% of its total outstanding debt.

The Company performed a sensitivity analysis assuming a hypothetical 10% adverse movement in the floating interest rate on the interest rate sensitive instruments described above. The Company believes that such a movement is reasonably possible in the near term. As of March 31, 2003, the analysis demonstrated that such movement would cause the Company to

B-20

recognize additional interest expense of approximately $1.0 million, and accordingly, would cause a hypothetical loss in cash flows of approximately $1.0 million on an annual basis.

The Company has significant debt and resulting debt service obligations. A substantial portion of the debt is subject to variable rate interest expense. The weighted average interest rate for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2003 was 5.8%. Interest rates are at historically low rates and an increase in interest rates in the future could have a material impact on the results of operations and financial position of the Company. An increase of 1% in interest rates would increase interest expense by approximately $6.7 million on an annual basis.

SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

On May 6, 2003 (the “Filing Date”), Acterna Corporation and its seven United States subsidiaries and affiliates filed Chapter 11 in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District in New York (the “Bankruptcy Court”) (the “Filing”). The Chapter 11 cases were consolidated for the administrative purpose of joint administration and were assigned case number 03-12837 (BRL) through 03-12483 (BRL). The Company’s non-U.S. subsidiaries were excluded from the Filing.

The Filing was made in response to an on-going decline in the communications test marketplace which has resulted in significant operating losses and the inability of the Company to perform in accordance with its financial covenants under the Senior Secured Credit Facility, the Convertible Notes, the Senior Subordinated Notes and its other debt obligations.

Under Chapter 11, the Company is operating its businesses as debtor-in-possession under court protection from its creditors and claimants, and intends to use Chapter 11 to substantially reduce its debt obligations and implement a plan of reorganization.

The Company concluded after evaluating all its alternatives, that a federal court-supervised Chapter 11 filing provides the best forum available to achieve a reduction in debt.

As a consequence of the Filing, pending litigation against the Company is generally stayed (subject to certain exceptions in the case of government authorities), and no party may take any action to realize its pre-petition claims except pursuant to order of the Bankruptcy Court, including all attempts to collect claims or enforce liens that arose prior to the commencement of the Company’s Filing. Also, the debtor may assume or reject pre-petition executory contracts and unexpired leases pursuant to section 365 of the Bankruptcy Code and other parties to executory contracts or unexpired leases being rejected may assert rejection damage claims as permitted thereunder.

The Company intends to address its plan for continued operations and all other pre-petition claims in a plan of reorganization. Prior to the Filing Date, the Company negotiated the salient terms of a plan of reorganization with certain key lenders under the Senior Secured Credit Facility. The Company’s current proposal for the plan of reorganization reflects:

There can be no assurance, however, that the Company’s proposal will be implemented, or that the Company’s creditors will not propose substantial changes to the Company’s proposal

FACTORS THAT MAY AFFECT FUTURE RESULTS

Set forth below and elsewhere in this annual report and in the other documents the Company files with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) are risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from the results The Company’s business, operations and financial condition are subject to various risks. Some of these risks are described below, and should be carefully considered in evaluating the Company or any investment decision relating to securities of the Company. This section does not describe all risks applicable to the Company, its industry or its business. It is intended only as a summary of the principal risks.

Factors Related to the Company’s Proposed Reorganization

Significant Challenges in Connection with Company’s Bankruptcy Reorganization

On May 6, 2003 (the “Filing Date”), the Company and its seven domestic subsidiaries filed voluntary petitions for relief under chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code in the Bankruptcy Court (Case Nos. 12837 (BRL) through 12843 (BRL))

B-21

(the “Chapter 11 Cases”). The Chapter 11 Cases are being jointly administered for procedural purposes. Since the Filing Date, the Debtors have been operating their business as debtors-in-possession pursuant to the Bankruptcy Code. There can be no assurance that the Company will be successful in reorganizing under the Chapter 11 Cases. If the Company is not successful in reorganizing under the Chapter 11 Cases, it could face liquidation. If a liquidation or protracted reorganization were to occur, there is a substantial risk that the value of the Company’s enterprise would be substantially eroded to the detriment of all stakeholders.

Because of the Company’s recurring losses from operations, the Chapter 11 Cases and the circumstances leading to the filing thereof, there is substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a ‘going concern’. The report of our independent auditors is modified for this uncertainty. The ability of the Company to continue as a ‘going-concern’ is dependent upon, among other things, (i) the ability of the Company to successfully achieve required cost savings to complete its restructuring; (ii) the ability of the Company to maintain adequate cash on hand; (iii) the ability of the Company to generate cash from operations; (iv) the ability of the Company to confirm a plan of reorganization under the Bankruptcy Code and obtain emergence financing; and (v) the ability of the Company to achieve profitability. There can be no assurance that the Company will be able to successfully achieve any of these objectives. The Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements have been prepared on the basis that it will continue as ‘going concern’ but our Filing raises substantial doubt in this regard.

Based on current and anticipated levels of operations and assuming consummation of a plan or reorganization, management believes that the Company will continue as a ‘going concern’. Accordingly, the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements included herein have been prepared assuming the Company will continue as a ‘going concern’.

In addition, the amounts reported in the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K do not reflect all of the adjustments to the carrying value of assets or the amount and classification of liabilities that ultimately may be necessary as the result of the adoption of a plan of reorganization. Adjustments necessitated by the plan of reorganization could materially change the amounts reported in the Consolidated Financial Statements included herein.

Compliance with the DIP Facility and Liquidity

Under the terms of the DIP, the Company is required to comply with various terms and conditions. There can be no assurance that the Company will be able to comply with such terms and conditions. In the event that the Company defaults under the DIP and the DIP is terminated, there can be no assurance that sufficient alternative financing arrangements will be available. Furthermore, in the event that cash flows, together with available borrowings under the DIP Facility or alternative financing arrangements, are not sufficient to meet the Company’s cash requirements, the Company may be required to reduce planned capital expenditures, sell additional assets and seek other sources of capital. The Company can provide no assurance that such actions will be sufficient to cover any cash shortfalls.

Restrictions on the Company’s Conduct of Its Business

The Debtors are operating their businesses as debtors-in-possession pursuant to the Bankruptcy Code. Under applicable bankruptcy law, during the pendency of the Chapter 11 Cases, the Debtors are required to obtain the approval of the Bankruptcy Court prior to engaging in any transaction outside the ordinary course of business. In connection with any such approval, creditors and other parties of interest may raise objections to such approval and may appear and be heard at any hearing with respect to any such approval. Accordingly, although the Debtors may seek the approval of the Bankruptcy Court to sell assets and settle liabilities (including for amounts other than those reflected on the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements), there can be no assurance that the Bankruptcy Court will grant such approvals. The Bankruptcy Court also has the authority to oversee and exert control over the Debtors’ ordinary course operations.

As a result of the restrictions described above, the ability of the Company to respond to changing business and economic conditions may be significantly restricted, and the Company may be prevented from engaging in transactions that might otherwise be considered beneficial.

Disruption of Operations Due to the Filing of the Chapter 11 Cases

As part of the first day relief requested in the Chapter 11 Cases, the Bankruptcy Court entered orders allowing the Company to pay pre-petition employee obligations and certain pre-petition key vendor trade claims in the ordinary course of business. The Debtors, however, were not permitted to pay all of its vendors in full. As a result, while the Company has not yet experienced any significant disruption in its relationships with its suppliers or vendors, the Company may have difficulty

B-22

maintaining existing relationships, or creating new relationships with suppliers or vendors. The Company’s suppliers and vendors could stop providing supplies or services to the Company or provide such supplies or services only on terms such as ‘cash on delivery,’ ‘cash on order,’ or other terms that could have an adverse impact on the Company’s short-term cash flows. In addition, the filing of the Chapter 11 Cases may adversely affect the Company’s ability to retain existing customers, attract new customers and maintain contracts that are critical to its operations

The filing of the Chapter 11 Cases and the publicity attendant thereto might also adversely affect the businesses of the Company’s non-debtor subsidiaries. Because the Company’s business is closely related to the businesses of all of the Company’s subsidiaries, any downturn in the business of its subsidiaries could also affect its prospects. It remains uncertain whether the commencement of the Chapter 11 Cases will adversely affect the businesses of any of the Company’s subsidiaries. Furthermore, the Company’s non-debtor subsidiaries do not have the benefit of the automatic stay and other protections afforded by the Bankruptcy Code.

Attracting and Retaining Key Personnel

The Company believes that its future success will be dependent upon its ability to attract and retain skilled managers and other employees. Since the Filing Date, the Company has been able to retain many of its key employees. However, no assurance can be given that the Company will be able to continue to do so in the future. Any failure of the Company to retain its personnel, including senior management, could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition and results of operations.

Implementing the Restructuring Strategy Involves Substantial Risks

There are substantial risks in implementing the Company’s restructuring strategy. These risks include:

One or more of these factors, individually or combined, could adversely affect the Company’s ability to conduct our operations.

Risk to Pre-Petition Equity Holders and Creditors

The final reorganization plan, ultimately confirmed, if any, will likely affect the value of the Company’s various pre-petition liabilities, common stock and/or other equity securities. Until a plan of reorganization is confirmed by the Bankruptcy Court, the recoveries of pre-petition claim holders are subject to change. Accordingly, no assurance can be given as to what values, if any, will be ascribed in the bankruptcy proceedings to each of these constituencies. It is currently contemplated that any plan of reorganization will likely result in (i) the cancellation of the Company’s existing common stock and other equity securities with holders thereof receiving no distributions under the plan of reorganization and (ii) a substantial impairment of the value of the Company’s Senior Subordinated Notes and its Convertible Notes. In light of the foregoing, the Company considers the value of its common stock and other existing equity securities to be highly speculative and cautions equity holders that it is likely that the common stock will ultimately be determined to have no value. Accordingly, the Company urges that appropriate caution be exercised with respect to any investment in the Company’s common stock or other equity securities or any claims relating to its pre-petition liabilities.

The Company’s quarterly operating results have fluctuated in the past and are likely to fluctuate in the future.

The Company has experienced in the past and expects to experience in the future fluctuations in its quarterly results due to a number of factors beyond the Company’s control. Many factors could cause the Company’s operating results to fluctuate from quarter to quarter, including the following:

B-23

The Company’s operating results could be harmed if the markets into which the Company sells its products experience a downturn as a result of a reduction in previously planned capital expenditures for infrastructure expansion

Several significant markets into which the Company sells its products are cyclical. For example, the telecommunications industry in general, and the competitive local exchange carrier segment in particular, are now experiencing a downturn that has resulted in a reduction in previously planned capital expenditures for infrastructure expansion. These industry downturns have been characterized by diminished product demand, excess manufacturing capacity and the subsequent accelerated erosion of average selling prices. Any further downturn in the Company’s customers’ markets or in general economic conditions would likely result in a further reduction in demand for the Company’s products and services, which would harm its business results and operating and financial condition. The Company’s customers, have also been effected by the downturn in the telecommunication industry and may be unable to meet current and ongoing obligations.

The Company operates in highly competitive markets

The markets for the Company’s products are highly competitive. Some of the Company’s current and potential competitors have greater name recognition and greater financial, selling and marketing, technical, manufacturing and other resources than the Company. In addition, due to the rapid evolution of the markets in which the Company competes, additional competitors with significant market presence and financial resources, including large telecommunications equipment manufacturers, may enter the Company’s markets and further intensify competition.

Due to the Company’s voluntary Chapter 11 filing, the Company could be negatively impacted in the marketplace. The Chapter 11 filing also provides competitors with additional negative incentives to present to customers and potential customers in competitive bid situations, which could negatively impact future operations.

The Company may not be able to compete effectively with its existing competitors or with new competitors, and the Company’s competitors may succeed in adapting more rapidly and effectively to changes in technology, in the market or in developing or marketing products that will be more widely accepted.

The markets the Company serves are characterized by rapid change and innovation. The Company may not be able to develop and successfully market products that account for such changes and innovations.

The market for the Company’s products and services is characterized by rapidly changing technologies, new and evolving industry standards and protocols, and product and service introductions and enhancements that may render the Company’s existing offerings obsolete or unmarketable. A shift in customer emphasis from employee-operated communications testing to automated, remote testing and monitoring systems could likewise render some of the Company’s existing product offerings obsolete or unmarketable, or reduce the size of one or more of the Company’s addressed markets. In particular, incorporation of self-testing functions in the equipment currently addressed by the Company’s communications test instruments could render some of its offerings redundant and unmarketable. Failure to anticipate or to respond rapidly to advances in technology and to adapt its products appropriately could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition and results of operations.

The development of new, technologically advanced products is a complex and uncertain process requiring the accurate anticipation of technological and market trends and the incurrence of substantial research and development costs. The

B-24

Company may not successfully anticipate such trends or have sufficient free cash flow to continue to incur such costs. The Company provides no assurance that it will successfully identify new product opportunities, develop and bring new products to market in a timely manner and achieve market acceptance of its products or that products and technologies developed by others will not render the Company’s products or technologies obsolete or noncompetitive.

The Company’s manufacturing efforts could be interrupted due to component shortages, which could reduce the Company’s ability to build and sell its products

The Company uses a number of components to build its products and systems that are only available from a limited number of, or single-source, vendors. In addition, to obtain the components the Company requires to build its products and systems, the Company may be required to identify alternate sources of supply, which can be time consuming and result in higher procurement costs. The Company also cannot assure that it will be able to obtain suitable substitutes for components that become unavailable, which could potentially require the Company to perform costly and time consuming redesigns of its products. If the Company is unable to obtain sufficient quantities of required components, or if suppliers choose to reduce the amount of parts they make available to the Company, the Company may be unable to meet customer demand for its products, which would negatively affect its business and results of operations and could materially damage customer relationships.

The Company has the majority of its printed circuit boards (PCBs) manufactured by contract manufacturers who assemble the Company’s PCBs and ship them to Acterna for final assembly and test. In the event these contract manufacturers were to stop providing their services for Acterna, it would take substantial time and expense to find an alternative. This delay could have a materially adverse impact on the business and results of operations of the Company.

Economic, political and other risks associated with international sales and operations could adversely affect the Company’s net sales

Because the Company sells its products worldwide, the Company’s business is subject to risks associated with doing business internationally. The Company expects its net sales originating outside the United States to be approximately half of the Company’s communication test total net sales for its 2004 fiscal year. In addition, many of the Company’s manufacturing facilities and suppliers are located outside the United States. Accordingly, the Company’s future results could be harmed by a variety of factors, including:

Compliance with applicable regulations, standards and protocols may be time consuming and costly for the Company

Many of the Company’s products must comply with significant governmental and industry-based regulations, certifications, standards and protocols, some of which evolve as new technologies are deployed. Compliance with such regulations, certifications, standards and protocols may prove costly and time-consuming for the Company, and the Company cannot provide assurance that its products will continue to meet these standards in the future. In addition, regulatory compliance may present barriers to entry in particular markets or reduce the profitability of the Company’s product offerings. Such regulations, certifications, standards and protocols may also adversely affect the communications industry, limit the number of potential customers for the Company’s products and services or otherwise have a material adverse effect on its business, financial condition and results of operations. Failure to comply, or delays in compliance, with such regulations, standards and protocols or delays in receipt of such certifications could delay the introduction of new products or cause the Company’s existing products to become obsolete.

If service providers reduce their use of field technicians and successfully implement a self-service installation model, demand for the Company’s products could decrease

To ensure quality service, the Company’s major service provider customers typically send a technician into the field who uses its products to verify service for installations. However, some providers have recently announced plans to encourage their customers to install their own service and, by doing so, hope to reduce their expenses and expedite installation for their customers. To encourage self-installation, these companies offer financial incentives. If service providers successfully implement these plans or choose to send technicians into the field only after a problem has been

B-25

reported, or if alternative methods of verification become available, such as remote verification service, the need for field technicians and the need for some of the Company’s communications test instruments could decrease, which would negatively affect the Company’s business and results of operations.

Third parties may claim the Company is infringing on their intellectual property and, as a result of such claims, the Company may face significant litigation or incur licensing expenses or be prevented from selling its products.

Third parties may claim that the Company is infringing on their intellectual property rights, and the Company may be found to have infringed on those intellectual property rights. Any litigation regarding patents or other intellectual property rights could be costly and time consuming, and divert the attentions of the Company’s management and key personnel from its business operations. Claims of intellectual property infringement might also require the Company to enter into costly royalty or license agreements. However, the Company may not be able to obtain royalty or license agreements on terms acceptable to it, or at all. The Company also may be subject to significant damages or injunctions against development and sale of certain of its products.

Third parties may infringe on the Company’s intellectual property and, as a result, the Company may be required to expend significant resources enforcing its rights or suffer competitively.

The Company’s success depends in large part on its intellectual property. The Company relies on a combination of patents, copyrights, trademarks and trade secrets, confidentiality provisions and licensing arrangements to establish and protect its proprietary intellectual property. If the Company fails to protect or to enforce successfully its intellectual property rights, the Company’s competitive position could suffer, which could have a material adverse effect on its business, financial condition and results of operations.

The Company’s products are complex, and its failure to detect errors and defects may subject it to costly repairs, product returns under warranty and product liability litigation.

The Company’s products are complex and may contain undetected defects or errors when first introduced or as enhancements are released. The existence of these errors or defects could result in costly repairs and/or returns of products under warranty, diversion of development resources and, more generally, in delayed market acceptance of the product or damage to the Company’s reputation and business, any of which could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition and results of operations.

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This report contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. The Company has based these forward-looking statements on its current expectations and projections about future events. Although the Company believes that its assumptions made in connection with the forward-looking statements are reasonable, there can be no assurance that the Company’s assumptions and expectations will prove to have been correct. These forward-looking statements are subject to various risks, uncertainties and assumptions, including the risk factors described elsewhere in this report and the Company’s other Securities and Exchange Commission filings.

The Company undertakes no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. In light of these risks, uncertainties and assumptions, the forward-looking events discussed in this report might not occur, actual results may differ materially from the estimates or expectations reflected in the Company’s forward-looking statements, and undue reliance should not be placed upon the forward-looking events discussed in this report.

B-26

APPENDIX C

ACTERNA CORPORATION

INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

C-1

Report of Independent Auditors

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of Acterna Corporation:

In our opinion, the accompanying consolidated balance sheets and the related consolidated statements of operations, of changes in stockholders deficit, and of cash flows present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Acterna Corporation and its subsidiaries at March 31, 2003 and March 31, 2002, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended March 31, 2003 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management; our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits of these statements in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America, which require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note B to the consolidated financial statements on May 6, 2003, Acterna Corporation and its United States subsidiaries filed voluntary petitions for reorganization under Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code. As discussed in Note B to the consolidated financial statements, the Company has defaulted on its interest payments and debt covenants. These conditions raise substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. Management’s plans in regard to these matters are also described in Note B. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.