Back to GetFilings.com

Table Of Contents

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

Commission file number 1-6311

TIDEWATER INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its Charter)

Registrant’s Telephone Number, including area code (504) 568-1010

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to the filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes X    No

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes X    No

Table Of Contents

The aggregate market value of the voting common stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant as of September 30, 2002, was approximately $1,497,384,583 based upon the last sales price reported for such date. Excluded from the calculation of market value are 4,076,278 shares held by the Registrant’s grantor stock ownership trust.

56,639,777 shares of Tidewater Inc. common stock $0.10 par value per share were outstanding on April 11, 2003. Excluded from the calculation of shares outstanding at April 11, 2003 are 3,939,150 shares held by the Registrant’s grantor stock ownership trust. Registrant has no other class of common stock outstanding.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

Portions of the Proxy Statement for Registrant’s 2003 Annual Meeting of Stockholders are incorporated into Part III of this report.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Part I

2

Table Of Contents

Forward-looking Information and Cautionary Statement

In accordance with the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, the company notes that this Annual Report on Form 10-K and the information incorporated herein by reference contain certain forward-looking statements which reflect the company’s current view with respect to future events and financial performance. Any such forward-looking statements are subject to risks and uncertainties and the company’s future results of operations could differ materially from historical results or current expectations. Some of these risks are discussed in this report, and include, without limitation, fluctuations in oil and gas prices; level of fleet additions by competitors and vessel overcapacity; changes in capital spending by customers in the energy industry for exploration, development and production; changing customer demands for different vessel specifications; acts of terrorism; unsettled political conditions, war, civil unrest and governmental actions, especially in higher risk countries of operations; foreign currency fluctuations; and environmental and labor laws.

Forward-looking statements, which can generally be identified by the use of such terminology as “may,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “forecast,” “believe,” “think,” “could,” “will,” “continue,” “intend,” “seek,” “plan,” “should,” “would” and similar expressions contained in this report, are predictions and not guarantees of future performance or events. Any forward-looking statements are based on current industry, financial or economic information, which the company has assessed but which by its nature is dynamic and subject to rapid and possibly abrupt changes. The company’s actual results could differ materially from those stated or implied by such forward-looking statements due to risks and uncertainties associated with our business. The forward-looking statements should be considered in the context of the risk factors listed above and discussed elsewhere in this Form 10-K. Investors and prospective investors are cautioned not to place undue reliance on such forward-looking statements. Management disclaims any obligation to update or revise the forward-looking statements contained herein to reflect new information, future events or developments.

PART I

ITEMS 1 and 2. BUSINESS AND PROPERTIES

General

Tidewater Inc. (the “company”), a Delaware corporation, provides offshore supply vessels and marine support services to the offshore energy industry through the operation of the world’s largest fleet of offshore marine service vessels. The company’s worldwide headquarters and principal executive offices are located at 601 Poydras Street, New Orleans, Louisiana 70130, and its telephone number is (504) 568-1010. The company was incorporated in 1956. Unless otherwise required by the context, the term “company” as used herein refers to Tidewater Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries.

With a fleet of over 545 vessels, the company operates (either through its consolidated entities or joint-ventures in which it participates), and has a leading market share, in most of the world’s significant oil and gas exploration and production markets and provides services supporting all phases of offshore exploration, development and production, including: towing of and anchor handling of mobile drilling rigs and equipment; transporting supplies and personnel necessary to sustain drilling, workover and production activities; assisting in offshore construction activities; and a variety of specialized services including pipe laying, cable laying and 3-D seismic work.

Availability of Reports

The company’s Internet website address is http://www.tdw.com. The company makes available free of charge, on or through its website, its annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q and current reports on Form 8-K and any amendments to those reports, as soon as reasonably practicable after they are electronically filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Information appearing on the company’s website is not part of any report filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

3

Table Of Contents

Recent Developments

On April 1, 2003, the company paid $79 million in cash to ENSCO International Incorporated to purchase its 27-vessel Gulf of Mexico-based marine fleet. The cash sale was funded by a newly-placed $100 million term loan agreement with a group of banks that expires on July 31, 2004. The loan bears interest, at the company’s option, at prime or Federal Funds rates plus .5% or Eurodollar rates plus margin of .85%. The mix of vessels the company acquired consists of five anchor handling towing supply vessels, six stretched 220-foot platform supply vessels and 16 supply vessels. In conjunction with this acquisition, it was also agreed that, for a period of two years and subject to satisfactory performance, the company will provide to ENSCO all of its discretionary vessel requirements in the Gulf of Mexico. The day rates to be charged under the arrangement are based upon predetermined pricing criteria. The acquisition enhances the competitive posture of the company in providing anchor handling and towing-supply services in the Gulf of Mexico and better positions the company for an upturn in the domestic market.

For the past three fiscal years, the company has engaged in an aggressive deepwater new-build vessel construction and deepwater vessel acquisition program. These efforts have facilitated the company’s entrance into the deepwater markets of the world. During this three year period, the company committed $729 million for the purchase and construction of 33 large deepwater vessels, of which $662.5 million has been expended through March 31, 2003. Twenty-six of these vessels, of which 11 were acquired and 15 were newly-built, have been delivered, crewed and are working under contracts of varied terms. The company also initiated a fleet replacement program for its supply boats in tandem with its deepwater vessel program and committed $149.8 million, of which $99.4 million has been expended through March 31, 2003, for the construction of 13 supply vessels. The first three replacement fleet vessels were delivered to the market during fiscal 2003. Scheduled delivery of the remaining 10 replacement vessels will begin in April 2003 with the final vessel delivered in May 2004. The six stretched platform supply vessels acquired from ENSCO on April 1, 2003 discussed above helped accelerate the company’s domestic fleet replacement program.

The company is also engaged in a crewboat expansion program that began in fiscal 2002 by acquiring 11 existing crewboats and committing to the construction of 14 additional crewboats of which six have been delivered to the market through fiscal 2003. The company committed $102.3 million for the acquisition and construction of these vessels, of which $72.2 million has been expended through March 31, 2003. Scheduled delivery of the remaining eight vessels under construction is expected to run from April 2003 through October 2003. Eighteen of the vessels are large traditional crewboats while four are state-of-the-art, fast, crew/supply vessels. The remaining three vessels are smaller water jet craft. The acquisition of these vessels has allowed the company to meet its customers’ demand for crewboats - a fast-growing segment of the offshore marine service market, and expand the company’s market share in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico. Crewboats typically maintain higher utilization rates and have lower maintenance costs compared to supply vessels. In addition, the crewboat market has fewer competitors as compared to the supply vessel market.

All three expansion programs were initiated with the intent to replace the company’s core fleet with fewer, larger and more efficient vessels while strengthening the company’s leading presence in all major oil and gas producing regions of the world. In order to avoid potential overcapacity in our markets that could be created through the addition of the vessels discussed above, the company sold and/or scrapped 121 vessels between April 2000 and March 2003.

The company has been financing all of its vessel commitment programs from current cash balances, operating cash flow and its revolving credit facility. At March 31, 2003, the company had 25 vessels under construction with a total capital commitment of $360.8 million, of which the company has already expended $214.1 million. A full discussion of each event including capital commitments and scheduled delivery dates is disclosed in the “Vessel Acquisition and Construction Programs” and “Vessel Dispositions” section of Item 7 and Notes 8 and 10 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Areas of Operation

The company’s fleet is deployed in the major offshore oil and gas areas of the world. The principal areas of the company’s operations include the U.S. Gulf of Mexico, the North Sea, the Persian Gulf, and

4

Table Of Contents

areas offshore Australia, Brazil, Egypt, India, Indonesia, Malaysia, Mexico, Trinidad, Venezuela and West Africa. The company conducts its operations through wholly-owned subsidiaries and joint ventures. Information concerning revenues and operating profit derived from domestic and international marine operations and domestic and international marine identifiable assets for each of the fiscal years ended March 31 are summarized below:

Please refer to Item 7 of this report and Note 11 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion of revenues, operating profit and identifiable assets.

Marine Vessel Fleet

The company’s vessels regularly and routinely move from one operating area to another, often to and from offshore operating areas of different continents. Tables comparing the average size of the company’s marine fleet by class and geographic distribution for the last three fiscal years are included in Item 7 of this report. The company discloses its vessel statistical information, such as utilization and average day rates, by vessel class. Listed below are the company’s five vessel classes along with a description of the type of vessels categorized in each class and the services the respective vessels perform.

Deepwater Vessels.    The company’s newest class of vessel is its deepwater vessel class, often referred to as North Sea-type vessels. Included in this class are large platform supply vessels and large, high-horsepower (generally greater than 10,000 horsepower) anchor handling towing supply vessels. This vessel class is chartered to customers for use in transporting supplies and equipment from shore bases to deepwater and intermediate offshore drilling rigs, platforms and other installations. Platform supply vessels, which have large cargo handling capabilities, serve drilling and production facilities and support offshore construction and maintenance work. The anchor handling towing supply vessels are equipped for and are capable of towing drilling rigs and other marine equipment, as well as setting anchors for positioning and mooring drilling rigs.

Towing Supply and Supply Vessels.    This is the company’s largest fleet class by number of vessels. Included in this class are anchor handling towing supply vessels and supply vessels with average horsepower below 10,000 BHP, and platform supply vessels that are generally less than 220 feet. The respective vessels in this class perform the same functions and services as their deepwater vessel class counterparts except they are chartered to customers for use in the intermediate and shallow waters.

Crewboats and Utility Vessels.    Crewboats and utility vessels are chartered to customers for use in transporting personnel and small quantities of supplies from shore bases to offshore drilling rigs, platforms and other installations.

5

Table Of Contents

Offshore Tugs.    Offshore tugs tow floating drilling rigs; dock tankers; tow barges; assist pipe laying, cable laying and construction barges; and are used in a variety of other commercial towing operations, including towing barges carrying a variety of bulk cargoes and containerized cargo.

Other Vessels.    The company’s vessels also include inshore tugs; inshore barges; offshore barges; and production, line-handling and various other special purpose vessels. Inshore tugs, which are operated principally within inland waters, tow drilling rigs to and from their locations, and tow barges carrying equipment and materials for use principally in inland waters for drilling and production operations. Barges are either used in conjunction with company tugs or are chartered to others.

Revenue Contribution of Main Classes of Vessels

Revenues from vessel operations were derived from the main classes of vessels in the following percentages:

Shipyard Operations

Quality Shipyards, LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of the company, operates two shipyards in Houma, Louisiana, which construct, modify and repair vessels. While the shipyard performs some work for outside customers, the majority of its business relates to the construction, repair and modification of the company’s vessels. Quality Shipyards, LLC recently constructed four of the company’s deepwater platform supply vessels. Three of the vessels were delivered in calendar year 2002 and the final vessel was delivered in March 2003. Quality Shipyards, LLC is presently constructing for the company three 220-foot next generation supply vessels which are scheduled for delivery between April 2003 and December 2003.

Insurance

The operation of any marine vessel involves an inherent risk of catastrophic marine disaster, adverse weather conditions, mechanical failure, collisions, and property losses to the vessel and business interruption due to political action in countries other than the United States. Any such event may result in a reduction in revenues or increased costs. The company’s vessels are insured for their estimated market value against damage or loss, including war, terrorism acts, and pollution risks. The company also carries workers’ compensation, maritime employer’s liability, directors and officers liability, general liability (including third party pollution) and other insurance customary in the industry.

The continued threat of terrorist activity and other acts of war or hostility following the terrorist attacks on the United States on September 11, 2001, the United States-led military response to counter terrorism and the current United States military actions in Afghanistan and Iraq have significantly increased the risk of political, economic and social instability in some of the geographic areas in which the company operates. It is possible that further acts of terrorism may be directed against the United States domestically or abroad and such acts of terrorism could be directed against properties and personnel of U.S.-owned companies such as ours. The resulting economic, political and social uncertainties, including the potential for terrorist acts and war, have caused the premiums charged for our insurance coverage to increase. After the events of September 11, 2001, the company’s insurance underwriters imposed higher premiums for war risk coverage on the company’s vessels. The company currently maintains war risk coverage on its entire fleet. To date, the company has not experienced any property losses as a result of terrorism, political instability or war.

Management believes that the company’s insurance coverage is adequate. The company has not experienced a loss in excess of insurance policy limits; however, there is no assurance that the company’s

6

Table Of Contents

liability coverage will be adequate to cover all potential claims that may arise nor can the company claim that it will be able to maintain adequate insurance in the future at rates considered reasonable especially with the current level of uncertainty in the market.

Industry Conditions, Competition and Customers

The company’s operations are materially dependent upon the levels of activity in offshore oil and natural gas exploration, development and production throughout the world. Such activity levels are affected by the trends in worldwide crude oil and natural gas prices that are ultimately influenced by the supply and demand relationship for the natural resources. A discussion of current market conditions appears under “General Market Conditions and Results of Operations” in Item 7 of this report.

The principal competitive factors for the offshore vessel service industry are suitability and availability of equipment, price and quality of service. The company has numerous competitors in virtually all areas in which it operates and competition is intense. During the current downturn in the Gulf of Mexico market, the company has made a strategic decision to attempt to maintain high day rates at the expense of lower utilization. The lower utilization of our Gulf of Mexico supply vessel fleet has resulted in the company “cold stacking” approximately 70% of its domestic supply vessel fleet. The majority of the company’s competitors in the Gulf of Mexico have elected to charge lower day rates and maintain a much higher utilization level for their vessels. Certain customers of the company own and operate vessels to service certain of their offshore activities.

The company’s diverse, mobile asset base and geographic distribution allow it to respond to changes in market conditions and provide a broad range of vessel services to its customers throughout the world. Management believes that the company has a significant competitive advantage because of the size, diversity and geographic distribution of its vessel fleet, the company’s financial condition and economies of scale.

The company’s principal customers are major oil and natural gas exploration, development and production companies, foreign government-owned or controlled organizations and companies that explore and produce oil and natural gas, and companies that provide other services to the offshore energy industry. Over the last several years, consolidation of exploration, development and production companies has occurred which has, and will continue to have, an impact on the company’s global operations. Although one customer accounted for 13% and the five largest customers accounted for approximately 36% of its revenues during the year ended March 31, 2003, the company does not consider its operations dependent on any single customer.

Regulatory Matters

The company’s vessels are subject to various statutes and regulations governing their operation and maintenance. Under the citizenship provisions of the Merchant Marine Act of 1920 and the Shipping Act, 1916, the company could not engage in U.S. coastwise trade if more than 25% of the company’s outstanding stock was owned by non-U.S. citizens. The company has a dual stock certificate system to protect against non-U.S. citizens from owning more than 25% of its common stock. In addition, the company’s charter permits the company certain remedies with respect to any transfer or purported transfer of shares of the company’s common stock that would result in the ownership by non-U.S. citizens of more than 24% of its common stock. Based on information supplied to the company by its transfer agent, approximately 4.3% of the company’s outstanding common stock was owned by non-U.S. citizens as of March 31, 2003.

The company’s vessels are subject to various statutes and regulations governing their operation. The laws of the United States provide that once a vessel is registered under a flag other than the United States, it cannot thereafter engage in U.S. coastwise trade. Therefore, the company’s non-U.S. flag vessels must continue to be operated abroad, and if the company was not able to secure charters abroad for them, and work would otherwise have been available for them in the United States, its operations would be adversely affected. Of the total 545 vessels owned or operated by the company at March 31, 2003, 305 were registered under flags other than the United States and 240 were registered under the U.S. flag.

7

Table Of Contents

All of the company’s offshore vessels are subject to international safety and classification standards. U.S. flag towing supply and supply vessels are required to undergo periodic inspections and to be recertified under drydock examination at least twice every five years. Vessels registered under flags other than the United States are subject to similar regulations as governed by the laws of the applicable jurisdictions.

Seasonality

The company’s vessel fleet generally has its highest utilization rates in the warmer temperature months when the weather is more favorable for offshore exploration, development and construction work. However, business volume for the company is more dependent on oil and natural gas prices and the global supply and demand conditions for the company’s services than any seasonal variation.

Environmental Compliance

During the ordinary course of business the company’s operations are subject to a wide variety of environmental laws and regulations. The company attempts to comply in all material respects with these laws and regulations in order to avoid costly accidents and related environmental damage. Compliance with existing governmental regulations that have been enacted or adopted regulating the discharge of materials into the environment, or otherwise relating to the protection of the environment, has not had, nor is expected to have, a material effect on the company. The company is proactive in establishing policies and operating procedures for safeguarding the environment against any environmentally hazardous material aboard its vessels and at shore base locations. Whenever possible, hazardous materials are maintained or transferred in confined areas to ensure containment if accidents occur. In addition, the company has established operating policies that are intended to increase awareness of actions that may harm the environment.

Employees

As of March 31, 2003, the company had approximately 6,950 employees worldwide. The company considers relations with its employees to be satisfactory. The company is not a party to any union contract in the United States but through several subsidiaries is a party to union agreements covering local nationals in several countries other than the United States. For the past few years, the company has been the target of a union organizing campaign for the U.S. Gulf of Mexico employees by maritime labor unions. These union efforts are still ongoing; however, union organizing activity has recently abated. If the Gulf employees were to unionize, the company’s flexibility in managing industry changes in the domestic market could be adversely affected.

Business Risk Factors

The company operates in a business environment that has many risks. Listed below are some of the more critical risk factors that affect the company and the offshore marine service industry and should be considered when evaluating any forward-looking statement. The effect of any one risk factor or a combination of several risk factors could materially affect the company’s results of operations and financial condition and the accuracy of any forward-looking statement made in this Form 10-K.

Oil and Gas Prices Are Highly Volatile.    Commodity prices for crude oil and natural gas are highly volatile. Prices are extremely sensitive to the supply/demand relationship for the respective natural resources. High demand for crude oil and natural gas and/or low inventory levels for the resources as well as any perceptions about future supply interruptions can cause commodity prices for crude oil and natural gas to rise, while generally, low demand for natural resources and/or increases in crude oil and natural gas supplies cause commodity prices for the respective natural resources to decrease.

Factors that affect the supply of crude oil and natural gas include but are not limited to the following: the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries’ (OPEC) ability to control crude oil production levels and pricing, as well as, the level of production by non-OPEC countries; political and economic uncertainties; advances in exploration and development technology; worldwide demand for natural resources; and governmental restrictions placed on exploration and production of natural resources.

8

Table Of Contents

Changes in the Level of Capital Spending by Our Customers.    The company’s principal customers are major oil and natural gas exploration, development and production companies. The company’s results of operations are highly dependent on the level of capital spending by the energy industry. The energy industry’s level of capital spending is substantially related to the prevailing commodity price of natural gas and crude oil. During periods of low commodity prices, the company’s customers generally reduce their capital spending budgets for offshore drilling, exploration and development.

The Offshore Marine Service Industry is Highly Competitive.    The company operates in a highly competitive environment. Competitive factors include price and quality of service by vessel operators and the quality and availability of vessels. Decreases in the level of offshore drilling and development activity by the energy industry generally negatively affect the demand for the company’s vessels thereby exerting downward pressure on day rates. Extended periods of low vessel demand and/or low day rates will reduce the company’s revenues. Also, excess marine service capacity exerts downward pressure on day rates. Excess capacity can occur when newly constructed vessels enter the market and when vessels are mobilized between market areas. While the company has committed to the construction of several vessels, it has also sold and/or scrapped a significant number of vessels over the last few years. A discussion about the company’s new vessel construction programs appears in the “Vessel Acquisition and Construction Programs” section of Item 7.

Failure to Attract and Retain Key Management and Technical Personnel.    The company’s success depends upon the continued service of its executive officers and other key management and technical personnel, particularly the company’s area managers and fleet personnel, and our ability to attract, retain, and motivate highly qualified personnel. The loss of the services of a number of the company’s executive officers, area managers, fleet personnel or other key employees, or our ability to recruit replacements for such personnel or to otherwise attract, retain and motivate highly qualified personnel could harm the company. The company currently does not carry key employee life insurance payable to the company with respect to any of its management employees.

Risks Associated with Operating Internationally.    For the fiscal years ended March 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001, 82%, 70%, and 63%, respectively, of the company’s total revenues were generated by international operations. The company’s international marine vessel operations are vulnerable to the usual risks inherent in doing business in countries other than the United States. Such risks include political and economic instability, possible vessel seizures or nationalization of assets and other governmental actions, the ability to recruit and retain management of overseas operations, currency fluctuations and revaluations, and import/export restrictions; all of which are beyond the control of the company.

The continued threat of terrorist activity and other acts of war or hostility following the terrorist attacks on the United States on September 11, 2001, the United States-led military response to counter terrorism and the current United States military actions in Afghanistan and Iraq have significantly increased the risk of political, economic and social instability in some of the geographic areas in which the company operates. It is possible that further acts of terrorism may be directed against the United States domestically or abroad and such acts of terrorism could be directed against properties and personnel of U.S.-owned companies such as ours. To date, the company has not experienced any property losses or material adverse effects on its results of operations and financial condition as a result of terrorism, political instability or war.

In addition to the foregoing general risks inherent with operating internationally, the company currently bears specific risks associated with its offshore operations in the Middle East, Southeast Asia, Venezuela and Nigeria. The potential for economic, political and social instability has been exacerbated in the Middle East by the U.S. war with Iraq and the continuing military presence in Afghanistan. Although terrorism and war developments have not adversely affected the company’s operations in the Middle East, the company, like other American companies engaged in business in the region, could be subject to the interruption of its operations, or other adverse developments. At this time, it is not possible to assess at what time in the future political and social conditions in this region will return to normal.

Political and social unrest continues to be present in Indonesia. Much of this turmoil can be traced to separatist groups opposing Indonesian governmental rule and also to religious turmoil and regional reaction to the United States military and political response to the terrorist attacks on the United States on

9

Table Of Contents

September 11, 2001. Although this reaction has not been destabilizing to the company, there continues to be a higher than normal level of unrest throughout the region.

In early December 2002, oil production in Venezuela was interrupted by a general strike led by the workers of the government-owned oil company in Venezuela (PDVSA). The debilitating national strike lasted for two months and ended in early February 2003. The company’s vessel operations in Venezuela were impacted by the two-month long strike. In December 2002 the company had 11 vessels contracted with PDVSA. The majority of the vessels ceased operations during strike, but continued to earn revenue on a per day basis as stipulated in the charter hire agreements or as agreed to by PDVSA representatives.

Violence in Nigeria since mid-March 2003 has significantly and adversely affected Nigeria’s oil production. Several exploration and production company’s operational facilities near Warri, Nigeria have been evacuated and shut down as a result of the civil unrest. Nigerian militants have taken over and threaten to destroy installations of oil multinationals in reprisal for attacks by the Nigerian military. The political unrest mainly affects our inshore Nigerian operations where smaller vessels with low day rates are chartered to customers. The company’s vessels that operated in the Warri area have come off hire due to the unrest; but these same vessels were immediately chartered to other customers with work sites located in areas of Nigeria that are not affected by the civil unrest. To date, the company’s results of operations in Nigeria have not been adversely affected by the political unrest, but the situation in Nigeria continues to be unstable.

At present, the company believes the risks of operating internationally to be within acceptable limits and, in view of the mobile nature of the company’s principal revenue producing assets, does not consider them to constitute a factor materially adverse to the conduct of its international marine vessel operations as a whole.

ITEM 3.    LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

The company is not a party to any litigation that, in the opinion of management, is likely to have a material adverse effect on the company’s financial position or results of operations.

ITEM 4.    SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS

There were no matters submitted to a vote of security holders during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2003.

ITEM 4A.    EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT

10

Table Of Contents

There are no family relationships between the directors or executive officers of the company. The company’s officers are elected annually by the Board of Directors and serve for one-year terms or until their successors are elected.

PART II

ITEM 5.    MARKET FOR THE REGISTRANT’S COMMON STOCK AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

The company’s common stock is traded on the New York Stock Exchange and the Pacific Stock Exchange under the symbol TDW. At March 31, 2003, there were approximately 1,716 record holders of the company’s common stock, based upon the record holder list maintained by the company’s stock transfer agent. The following table sets forth the high and low closing sale prices of the company’s common stock as reported on the New York Stock Exchange Composite Tape and the amount of cash dividends per share declared on Tidewater common stock for the periods indicated.

For information regarding shares of common stock authorized for issuance under the company’s equity compensation plans see Item 12 Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management.

ITEM 6.    SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

The following table sets forth a summary of selected financial data for each of the last five fiscal years. This information should be read in conjunction with “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and the Consolidated Financial Statements of the company included in this report.

11

Table Of Contents

ITEM 7.    MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND  RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Overview

The company provides services and equipment to the global offshore energy industry through the operation of a diversified fleet of marine service vessels. Revenues, net earnings and cash flows from operations are dependent upon the activity level of the vessel fleet that is ultimately dependent upon oil and natural gas prices that, in turn, are determined by the supply/demand relationship for oil and natural gas. The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the Selected Financial Data and the Consolidated Financial Statements and related disclosures.

Forward-looking Information and Cautionary Statement

In accordance with the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, the company notes that this Annual Report on Form 10-K and the information incorporated herein by reference contain certain forward-looking statements which reflect the company’s current view with respect to future events and financial performance. Any such forward-looking statements are subject to risks and uncertainties and the company’s future results of operations could differ materially from historical results or current expectations. Some of these risks are discussed in this report, and include, without limitation, fluctuations in oil and gas prices; level of fleet additions by competitors and vessel overcapacity; changes in capital spending by customers in the energy industry for exploration, development and production; changing customer demands for different vessel specifications; acts of terrorism; unsettled political conditions, war, civil unrest and governmental actions, especially in higher risk countries of operations; foreign currency fluctuations; and environmental and labor laws.

Forward-looking statements, which can generally be identified by the use of such terminology as “may,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “forecast,” “believe,” “think,” “could,” “will,” “continue,” “intend,” “seek,” “plan,” “should,” “would” and similar expressions contained in this report, are predictions and not guarantees of future performance or events. Any forward-looking statements are based on current industry, financial or economic information, which the company has assessed but which by its nature is dynamic and subject to rapid and possibly abrupt changes. The company’s actual results could differ materially from those stated or implied by such forward-looking statements due to risks and uncertainties associated with our business. The forward-looking statements should be considered in the context of the risk factors listed above and discussed elsewhere in this Form 10-K. Investors and prospective investors are cautioned not to place undue reliance on such forward-looking statements. Management disclaims any obligation to update or revise the forward-looking statements contained herein to reflect new information, future events or developments.

Critical Accounting Policies

The preparation of financial statements in accordance with accounting standards generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect both the recorded values of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the revenues recognized and expenses incurred during the reporting period. The company’s estimates and assumptions affect its recognition of deferred expenses, bad debts, income taxes, the carrying value of its long-lived assets and goodwill, and its provision for certain contingencies. The company evaluates the reasonableness of these estimates and assumptions continually based on a combination of historical information and other information that comes to its attention that may vary its outlook for the future. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions.

Management suggests that the company’s Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, as described in Note 1 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, be read in conjunction with this Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations. The company believes the critical accounting policies that most impact the company’s consolidated financial statements are described below.

12

Table Of Contents

Revenue Recognition.    The company’s primary source of revenue is derived from time charter contracts of its vessels on a rate per day of service basis. These time charter contracts are generally either on a term basis (average three months to two years) or on a “spot” basis. The base rate of hire for a term contract is generally a fixed rate, provided, however, that term contracts often include escalation clauses to recover specific additional costs. A spot contract is a short-term agreement to provide offshore marine services to a customer for a specific short-term job. Spot contract terms generally range from one day to one week. Marine vessel revenues are recognized on a daily basis throughout the contract period.

Receivables.    In the normal course of business, the company extends credit to its customers on a short-term basis. The company’s principal customers are major oil and natural gas exploration, development and production companies. Although credit risks associated with our customers are considered minimal, the company routinely reviews its accounts receivable balances and makes adequate provisions for doubtful accounts.

The company self-insures potential hull damage and personal injury claims that may arise in the normal course of business. The company is exposed to insurance risks related to the company’s reinsurance contracts with various insurance entities. The reinsurance recoverable amount can vary depending on the size of a loss. The exact amount of the reinsurance recoverable is not known until all losses are settled. The company estimates the reinsurance recoverable amount it expects to receive and also estimates losses for claims that have occurred but have not been reported or not fully developed. The company also monitors its reinsurance recoverable balances regularly for possible reinsurance exposure and makes adequate provisions for doubtful reinsurance receivables. It is the company’s opinion that its accounts and reinsurance receivables have no impairment other than that for which provisions have been made.

Goodwill.    The company tests goodwill impairment annually at a reporting unit level, as required, using carrying amounts as of December 31. The company considers its reporting units to be its domestic and international operations. The implied fair value of the reporting unit is determined by discounting the projected future operating cash flows for the remaining average useful life of the assets within the reporting units by the company’s related cost of capital. Impairment is deemed to exist if the implied fair value of the reporting unit is less than the respective book value of the reporting unit, and in such case, an impairment loss would be recognized equal to the difference. There are many assumptions and estimates underlying the determination of the implied fair value of each reporting unit, such as, future expected utilization and average day rates for the vessels, vessel additions and attrition, operating expenses and tax rates. Although the company believes its assumptions and estimates are reasonable, deviations from the assumptions and estimates could produce a materially different result.

The company performed its annual impairment test as of December 31, 2002, and the test determined there was no goodwill impairment. At March 31, 2003, the company’s goodwill balance represented 18% of total assets and 24% of stockholders’ equity. Interim testing will be performed when events occur or circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of goodwill may be impaired. Examples of events or circumstances that might give rise to interim goodwill impairment testing include significant adverse industry or economic changes, significant business interruption due to political unrest or terrorism, unanticipated competition that has the potential to dramatically reduce the company’s earning potential, legal issues, or the loss of key personnel.

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets.    The company reviews long-lived assets for impairment whenever events occur or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of assets may not be recoverable. In such evaluation, the estimated future undiscounted cash flows generated by an asset, based upon the company’s reasonable estimate of the remaining useful life of the asset, are compared with the amount recorded for the asset to determine if a write-down may be required. The company estimates cash flow based upon historical data adjusted for the company’s best estimate of future market performance that is based on industry trends. If impairment exists, the carrying value of the long-lived asset is reduced to the estimated fair value of the asset, based upon its estimated future discounted cash flows. Although the company believes its assumptions and estimates are reasonable, deviations from the assumptions and estimates could produce a materially different result.

13

Table Of Contents

Income Taxes.    The company determines its effective tax rate by estimating its permanent differences resulting from differing treatment of items for tax and accounting purposes. The company is periodically audited by taxing authorities in the United States and by the respective tax agencies in the countries in which we operate internationally. The tax audits generally include questions regarding the calculation of taxable income. Audit adjustments affecting permanent differences could have an impact on the company’s effective tax rate.

The carrying value of the company’s net deferred tax assets assumes that the company will be able to generate sufficient future taxable income in certain tax jurisdictions to utilize such deferred tax assets, based on estimates and assumptions. If these estimates and related assumptions change in the future, the company may be required to record additional valuation allowances against its deferred tax assets resulting in additional income tax expense in the company’s consolidated statement of operations. Management evaluates the realizability of the deferred tax assets quarterly and assesses the need for additional valuation allowances quarterly. While the company has considered future taxable income and ongoing prudent and feasible tax planning strategies in assessing the need for the valuation allowance, in the event the company were to determine that it would be able to realize its deferred tax assets in the future in excess of its net recorded amount, an adjustment to the deferred tax asset would increase income in the period such determination was made. Should the company determine that it would not be able to realize all or part of its net deferred tax asset in the future, an adjustment to the deferred tax asset would be charged to income in the period such determination was made.

Drydocking Costs.    The company expenses maintenance and repair costs as incurred during the asset’s original estimated useful life (its original depreciable life). Major repair costs incurred after the original depreciable life that also has the effect of extending the useful life of the asset are capitalized and amortized over 30 months. Major vessel modifications are capitalized and amortized over the remaining life of the equipment. The company schedules vessel drydockings when it is anticipated that the work can be performed. The company’s net earnings can fluctuate quarter to quarter due to the timing of scheduled drydockings.

Vessel Acquisition and Construction Programs

On April 1, 2003, the company paid $79 million in cash to ENSCO International Incorporated to purchase its 27-vessel Gulf of Mexico-based marine fleet. The cash sale was funded by a newly-placed $100 million term loan agreement with a group of banks that expires on July 31, 2004. The loan bears interest, at the company’s option, at prime or Federal Funds rates plus .5% or Eurodollar rates plus margin of .85%. The mix of vessels the company acquired consists of five anchor handling towing supply vessels, six stretched 220-foot platform supply vessels and 16 supply vessels. In conjunction with this acquisition, it was also agreed that, for a period of two years and subject to satisfactory performance, the company will provide to ENSCO all of its discretionary vessel requirements in the Gulf of Mexico. The day rates to be charged under the arrangement are based upon predetermined pricing criteria. The acquisition enhances the competitive posture of the company in providing anchor handling and towing-supply services in the Gulf of Mexico and better positions the company for an upturn in the domestic market.

On January 10, 2001 the company entered into agreements with three shipyards for the construction of seven large platform supply and five large anchor handling towing supply vessels. All of which are capable of working in most deepwater markets of the world. The total estimated cost for the vessels is approximately $344.2 million, which includes shipyard commitments and other incidental costs such as spare parts, management and supervision, and outfitting costs. The new-build program was initiated in order to better serve the needs of the company’s customers in the deepwater markets of the world. Four of the platform supply vessels contracts were awarded to the company’s shipyard, Quality Shipyards, LLC, while the remaining eight vessels are being constructed at two shipyards in Far East Asia.

As of March 31, 2003, six of the seven large platform supply vessels have been delivered to the market for an approximate total cost of $145.7 million. Quality Shipyards, LLC delivered the first vessel to the market during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2002 and the remaining three throughout fiscal 2003. All four platform supply vessels constructed at Quality Shipyards, LLC were built to full Jones Act compliance. A shipyard in Singapore is still constructing one platform supply vessel. The Singapore

14

Table Of Contents

shipyard delivered two vessels during the third quarter of fiscal 2003 and is expected to deliver the last vessel in April 2003. As of March 31, 2003, $17 million has been expended on the remaining platform supply vessel of the total estimated $17.4 million cost.

The five large anchor handling towing supply vessels under contract at a shipyard in Far East Asia are still under construction. Scheduled deliveries for the five vessels have been delayed. The company expects the first vessel to be delivered to the market in late calendar year 2003 while the remaining four vessels are expected to be delivered throughout calendar year 2004. The company has fixed cost contracts supported by performance bonds with the shipyard and does not anticipate any cost overruns related to these vessels. As of March 31, 2003, $122.2 million has been expended on these five vessels of the total estimated $181.1 million of commitments.

The company is also committed to the construction of one large, North Sea-type platform supply vessel (which is being constructed in a Brazilian shipyard) and 10 next generation supply vessels, ranging in size from 205-foot to 220-foot, for approximately $130.2 million. The company’s shipyard, Quality Shipyard, LLC, will construct three of the next generation supply vessels and two other shipyards will construct the remaining seven vessels. The 10 vessels are intermediate in size and are technically capable of working in certain deepwater markets; however, these vessels are being constructed in order to replace older supply vessels. Scheduled delivery of the 11 vessels is expected to commence in April 2003 with final delivery in May 2004. As of March 31, 2003, $72.8 million has been expended on these vessels.

During fiscal 2002, the company announced that it was expanding its crewboat fleet. The company purchased 10 existing crewboats and assumed four new-build contracts from Crewboats, Inc., a privately held, leading independent provider of crewboat services in the Gulf of Mexico, for approximately $59.9 million. Two of the new-build vessels were delivered to the market during fiscal 2003 for an approximate total cost of $10.4 million. Scheduled delivery for the remaining two crewboats is expected to commence in June 2003 with final delivery in September 2003. No amounts have been expended on the remaining two crewboats of the total $10.4 million commitment cost, as the individual vessels’ purchase prices are due upon delivery of the respective vessels.

Also in fiscal 2002, the company committed $25.4 million to the construction of four, 175-foot, state-of-the-art, fast, crew/supply boats that blend the speed of a crewboat with the capabilities of a supply vessel. The first 175-foot crewboat was delivered to the market during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2003 for an approximate total cost of $6.4 million. The vessel was constructed at a U.S. shipyard that is currently constructing the remaining three vessels. Scheduled delivery for the three vessels is expected to commence in April 2003, with final delivery in September 2003. As of March 31, 2003, $1.4 million has been expended on the remaining three vessels.

During fiscal 2003, the company entered into an agreement with a shipyard in Holland to construct three water jet crewboats for an approximate cost of $2.7 million. Scheduled delivery for the three vessels is expected to begin in August 2003 with final delivery in October 2003. As of March 31, 2003, $.7 million has been expended on these vessels.

The table below summarizes the number of vessels that have been added to the company’s fleet during fiscal 2003 and 2002 by vessel class and vessel type:

15

Table Of Contents

The table below summarizes the various vessel commitments by vessel class and type as of March 31, 2003:

To date, the company has financed its vessel commitment programs from its current cash balances, its operating cash flow and its revolving credit facility. Of the total $360.8 million of capital commitments for vessels currently under construction the company has expended $214.1 million as of March 31, 2003.

While the company has not formally committed to any future new build vessel contracts at the present time, other than what has been discussed above, the company anticipates over the next several years continuing its vessel building program in order to replace its aging vessels. The majority of the company’s supply and towing supply vessels were constructed between 1976 and 1983. As such, most of this vessel class exceeds 20 years of age and will ultimately need to be replaced. In addition to age, market conditions will also help determine when a vessel is no longer economically viable. The company anticipates using future operating cash flows and borrowing capacities to fund significant capital expenditures over the next several years.

In addition to the vessel deliveries discussed above, during fiscal 2003, the company took delivery of two large deepwater platform supply vessels (one constructed in Brazil and the other in Norway) for approximately $36.8 million and took delivery of three 220-foot next generation platform supply vessels for approximately $36.6 million. The company also entered into an agreement to bareboat charter one large platform supply vessel.

In fiscal 2002, the company took delivery of three large platform supply vessels built in Norway for a total cost of $46.6 million. During the first quarter of fiscal 2002, the company finalized the cash purchase of two anchor handling towing supply vessels for $48 million. The three large platform supply vessels and two anchor handling towing supply vessels are specifically designed and equipped for deepwater work. Throughout fiscal 2002 the company constructed and took delivery of four large traditional crewboats that were built at U.S. shipyards for approximately $14.2 million.

During fiscal 2001, the company purchased eight vessels from The Sanko Steamship Co., Ltd. for $160 million in cash. Four of the vessels are large anchor handling towing supply vessels and four are large North Sea-type platform supply vessels. In addition, throughout fiscal 2001, the company purchased three large platform supply vessels for approximately $53.8 million.

Vessel Dispositions

During fiscal 2003, the company sold one deepwater platform supply vessel and one crewboat to one of its 49%-owned unconsolidated joint ventures for $18.8 million. The company financed the $16 million sale of the deepwater vessel, while the joint venture paid $2.8 million cash for the crewboat. The transactions resulted in a fiscal 2003 gain on sales of assets of $1.1 million and increased the investments in, at equity, and advances to unconsolidated companies’ account by $14.9 million.

During fiscal 2002, the company sold its 49% holding in its consolidated marine joint venture, Maritide Offshore Oil Services Company S.A.E., for approximately $3.5 million, resulting in a $1.6 million gain. As a result of the sale, the international towing-supply/supply vessel count decreased by five vessels.

16

Table Of Contents

During fiscal 2001, the company sold four vessels (two offshore tugs and two crewboats) to one of its 49%-owned unconsolidated joint ventures for $17 million, of which $9 million was financed by the company. The transaction resulted in a gain on asset sale of $1 million. Also during fiscal 2001, the company sold its 40% holding in its unconsolidated marine joint venture, National Marine Service (NMS), for approximately $31 million, resulting in a $16.8 million gain. The after-tax effect of the gain on the sale was $10.9 million, or $.19 per share. As a result of the sale, the joint venture vessel count decreased by 24 vessels.

During the same period the company was building new vessels, the company sold and/or scrapped 121 vessels between April 2000 and March 2003. The mix of vessels disposed of includes 58 towing-supply/supply vessels, 29 crew/utility vessels, 15 offshore tugs and 19 other vessels, primarily barges. Included in the vessel disposition count are the NMS and Maritide vessels discussed above.

Vessels Withdrawn from Service

The company withdraws from active service older, little-used vessels at which time the vessels are removed from the utilization statistics. Vessel utilization rates are a function of vessel days worked and vessel days available for active vessels only. The company did not withdraw any vessel from active service during fiscal 2003. During fiscal 2002, the company withdrew 20 vessels, primarily towing supply/supply vessels, from active service. Eight vessels were withdrawn from active service during fiscal 2001. Vessels that are withdrawn from active service are intended to be sold. The company continues to dispose of its older vessels out of the active fleet and the withdrawn fleet that are not marketable due to obsolescence or are economically prohibitive to operate due to high repair costs.

General Market Conditions and Results of Operations

Offshore service vessels provide a diverse range of services and equipment to the energy industry. Fleet size, utilization and vessel day rates primarily determine the amount of revenues and operating profit because operating costs and depreciation do not change proportionally when revenue changes. Operating costs primarily consist of crew costs; repair and maintenance; insurance; fuel, lube oil and supplies. Fleet size and utilization are the major factors that affect crew costs. The timing and amount of repair and maintenance costs are influenced by customer demands, vessel age and scheduled drydockings to satisfy safety and inspection requirements mandated by regulatory agencies. Whenever possible, vessel drydockings are done during seasonally slow periods to minimize any impact on vessel operations and are only done if economically justified, given the vessel’s age and physical condition. The following table compares revenues and operating expenses (excluding general and administrative expenses and depreciation expense) for the company’s vessel fleet for the years ended March 31. Vessel revenues and operating costs relate to vessels owned and operated by the company, while other marine services relate to third-party activities of the company’s shipyards, brokered vessels and other miscellaneous marine-related activities.

17

Table Of Contents

Marine operating profit and other components of earnings before income taxes for the years ended March 31 consists of the following:

As a result of the uncertainty of a certain customer to make payment of vessel charter hire, the company has deferred the recognition of approximately $5.6 million of billings as of March 31, 2003, $4.9 million of billings as of March 31, 2002 and $7.0 million of billings as of March 31, 2001 which would otherwise have been recognized as revenue. The company will recognize the amounts as revenue as cash is collected or at such time as the uncertainty has been reduced.

Comparison of Fiscal 2003 to Fiscal 2002

Fiscal 2003 results of operations decreased as compared to fiscal 2002 due to a weak natural gas market in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico. The company’s fiscal 2003 domestic results of operations were negatively affected by the retrenchment in development and capital expenditures in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico that began in fiscal 2002 and which is discussed in detail in the Comparison of Fiscal 2002 to Fiscal 2001 section below. Market conditions improved during fiscal 2003 as natural gas supplies declined due to a general reduction in drilling activity, drilling interruptions caused by Tropical Storm Isidore and Hurricane Lili in the Gulf of Mexico, and as a result of increased demand due to severe winter weather. All of these factors contributed to higher natural gas prices, but did not result in increased gas drilling in the Gulf of Mexico market. Although the reasons for the continuing low level of drilling and exploration activity are not fully known, the company believes that general uncertain economic conditions and concerns about the stability of natural gas prices are significant contributing factors. Nevertheless, current inventory levels for the resource continue to be tight and commodity prices continue to be at strong levels, which are positive indicators for increased drilling activity in the future. The company’s fiscal 2003 international results of operations benefited from attractive crude oil commodity prices and high consumer demand. Average day rates and utilization for the international vessel fleet remained relatively stable throughout fiscal 2003 although political unrest in Venezuela during the latter part of fiscal 2003 did have a slight negative impact on revenues. International vessel demand, which is primarily driven by crude oil production, is expected to remain steady as international exploration and production is expected to remain firm. The U.S. war with Iraq in the Middle East could obviously have an impact on future world oil supply and demand, but thus far has not had a significant impact on the company’s revenues.

Domestic-based vessel revenues decreased 49% as compared to fiscal 2002 due to lower utilization and average day rates. The company’s average day rates have not deteriorated to the low levels experienced during the last industry downturn due to management’s strategic decision to attempt to maintain high day rates at the expense of lower utilization. As a result of this decision, the vessel utilization rates in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico are the lowest the company has experienced in over a decade. Utilization and average day rates for the towing supply/supply vessels, the company’s major income producing vessel class in the domestic market, decreased approximately 58% and 14%, respectively as compared to fiscal 2002. At March 31, 2002, the towing-supply/supply vessels experienced approximately 16% utilization and average day rates of approximately $5,940.

International-based vessel revenues increased a modest 2% as compared to fiscal 2002 due to higher average day rates and an increase in the number of active vessels operating internationally. A two month long general strike that shut down oil production in Venezuela that began in early December 2002 and lasted through early February 2003 which was led by the workers of the Venezuelan government-

18

Table Of Contents

owned company PDVSA had a slight negative impact on international revenues. In December 2002, the company had 11 vessels contracted with PDVSA. The majority of the vessels ceased operations during the work stoppage, but continued to earn revenue on a per day basis as stipulated in the charter hire agreements or as agreed to by PDVSA representatives. Venezuelan operations resulted in approximately $3.5 million of revenue during the strike. Total accounts receivable from PDVSA at March 31, 2003 were approximately $5.7 million.

In November 2000, the company purchased seven deepwater vessels that are currently fulfilling bareboat contractual obligations that existed at the time the vessels were purchased. The bareboat charter agreements on six of the vessels will expire at various times over the next year, although in one of the agreements, the charter party has the option to extend the contract for an additional two years. The remaining vessel has a contractual obligation that expires within four years. In a bareboat charter agreement, the bareboat charterer leases a vessel for a pre-arranged fee and is able to market the vessel and is also responsible for providing the crew and all other operating costs related to the vessel. For the vessels that the company has under bareboat contracts, only revenue and depreciation expense are recorded related to the vessels’ activity. As the company incurs no operating costs related to the vessels, the related bareboat day rates are less than comparable vessels operating under normal charter hire arrangements. For fiscal year ended March 31, 2003, the seven bareboat chartered deepwater vessels experienced 100% utilization and average day rates of approximately $6,500. The international-based deepwater vessel fleet, excluding the bareboat chartered vessels discussed above, experienced approximately 83% utilization and average day rates of approximately $13,500 for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2003.

Operating profit for fiscal 2003 decreased 37% as compared to fiscal 2002 primarily as a result of decreases in domestic-based vessel revenues. Domestic operating profit decreased most dramatically due to a weak natural gas market in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico. Domestic-based operating costs decreased 26% during fiscal 2003 due to general cost cutting measures that were implemented which resulted in a reduction of domestic crew and a decrease in the number of vessel drydockings performed. In addition, the reduction in business activity reduced fuel, lube and supplies costs and other vessel operating cost. During fiscal 2003, international-based operating profit decreased 4% as compared to fiscal 2002 due to a slight decrease in utilization, the negative effects of the two month long work stoppage in Venezuelan operations, and also due to a slight increase in international operating costs, primarily crew costs and fuel, lube and supply costs. Fiscal 2003’s gain on sales of assets was lower as compared to fiscal 2002 due to fewer vessels sales. Fiscal 2002 gain on sales of assets included a $3.3 million writedown in the carrying value of certain vessels. The writedowns were a result of reviewing the recoverability of the carrying values of the vessels that were withdrawn from active service.

Comparison of Fiscal 2002 to Fiscal 2001

Fiscal 2002 results of operations surpassed those achieved in fiscal 2001 due to strengthened world crude oil commodity prices. Throughout fiscal 2002, OPEC adjusted crude oil production levels and successfully negotiated with several non-OPEC oil producing countries to adjust their respective production levels in order to help stabilize and maintain crude oil commodity prices at levels that would sustain growth. The higher crude oil prices resulted in international offshore drilling, exploration and production companies increasing their capital spending budgets. International vessel demand, which is primarily driven by crude oil production, increased throughout fiscal 2002 as a result of the improved international market conditions. Domestic vessel demand, which is primarily driven by natural gas production, declined steadily throughout fiscal 2002 as exploration and production companies operating in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico reduced their capital investments in the Gulf. The high offshore rig fleet utilization rates achieved during fiscal 2001 began to steadily decrease during the second quarter of fiscal 2002 and continued to decrease throughout the remainder of fiscal 2002 on the news that inventory levels for natural gas were increasing as a result of unseasonably moderate weather and economic slowdowns in the United States and globally. The company’s depressed vessel utilization rates in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico were the lowest the company has experienced in well over a decade.

During fiscal 2002, international-based vessel revenues increased 32% as compared to fiscal 2001 due to higher average day rates, utilization, and an increase in the number of active vessels in the international-based fleet. The number of active vessels in the international fleet increased as a result of an

19

Table Of Contents

aggressive deepwater vessel acquisition and construction program that began during fiscal 2001. Seventeen deepwater vessels have been added to the company’s fleet since the beginning of fiscal 2001, seven of which were fulfilling bareboat contractual obligations that existed at the time the vessels were purchased. For fiscal years ended March 31, 2002 and 2001 the seven bareboat chartered deepwater vessels experienced 100% utilization and average day rates of $6,150. The international-based deepwater vessel fleet, excluding the bareboat chartered vessels discussed above, experienced approximately 89% utilization and average day rates of approximately $13,300 for the year ended March 31, 2002.

Fiscal 2002 domestic-based vessel revenues increased slightly as compared to fiscal 2001 as a result of higher average day rates. Average day rates increased due to strong demand for the company’s vessels in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico during the first quarter of fiscal 2002 that continued from fiscal 2001. However, during the second quarter of fiscal 2002, vessel demand began to decrease and continued to decrease throughout the remainder of the fiscal year as offshore drilling and exploration in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico waned. The company was able to achieve solid average day rates throughout fiscal 2002, although it did experience deterioration in vessel utilization throughout fiscal 2002. At March 31, 2002, the towing-supply/supply vessels, the company’s largest major income producing asset in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico, experienced approximately 25% utilization and average day rates of approximately $6,500.

Operating profit for fiscal 2002 increased 74% as compared to fiscal 2001 as a result of increases in vessel revenues. Crew costs increased during fiscal 2002 as a result of better market conditions and additional vessels in the international areas of operations. Repair and maintenance costs decreased from the fiscal 2001 level as fiscal 2001 included an unusually high number of drydockings resulting from an intense drydocking program the company initiated in order to ready its equipment for an expected improvement in demand for its vessels. Included in fiscal 2002’s gain on sales of assets is a $1.6 million gain from the sale of the company’s 49% holding in its consolidated marine joint venture, Maritide Offshore Oil Services Company S.A.E., for approximately $3.5 million and a $3.3 million writedown in the carrying values of certain vessels that were withdrawn from active service and held for sale. The writedown is a result of reviewing the recoverability of the carrying values of the vessels that were withdrawn from active service. Fiscal year 2001’s gain on sales of assets included a $16.8 million gain on the sale of the company’s 40% holding in its unconsolidated marine joint venture, National Marine Service. Fiscal 2002 other income decreased as compared to fiscal 2001 because the company had less excess cash invested in short-term, interest-bearing securities than the previous fiscal year as a result of the use of the funds for vessel acquisition and new-build programs.

Vessel Class Statistics

Vessel utilization is determined primarily by market conditions and to a lesser extent by drydocking requirements. Vessel day rates are determined by the demand created through the level of offshore exploration, development and production spending by energy companies relative to the supply of offshore service vessels. Suitability of equipment and the degree of service provided also influence vessel day rates. The following tables compare day-based utilization percentages and average day rates by vessel class and in total for each of the quarters in the years ended March 31:

20

Table Of Contents

UTILIZATION:

21

Table Of Contents

AVERAGE DAY RATES: