Back to GetFilings.com





UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K
Annual Report for the Fiscal year ended December 31, 2002

TTR TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)


Delaware 0-22055 11-3223672
(State or Other Jurisdiction Commission File IRS Employer
of Incorporation) Number) Identification No.)

575 LEXINGTON AVENUE
NEW YORK, NEW YORK 10022
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)

212-527-7599
(Registrant's Telephone Number, including Area Code)

[Mark One]

|X| ANNUAL REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
ACT OF 1934 For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002

|_| TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934


SECURITIES REGISTERED UNDER SECTION 12(B) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT: None

SECURITIES REGISTERED UNDER SECTION 12(G) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT:
Common Stock, par value $0.001(Title of Class)


Check whether the issuer (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the past 12 months (or for such
shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2)
has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. |X| Yes |_|
No

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item
405 of Regulation S-K is not contained, and will not be contained, to the best
of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements
incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this
Form 10-K. |_|

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as
defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). | | Yes |X| No

As of March 31, 2003, the Registrant had outstanding 18,261,567 shares of
Common Stock, $0.001 par value per share. The aggregate market value of such
common stock held by non-affiliates of the Registrant at March 31, 2003 was
approximately $6.94 million. Such market value was calculated by using the
closing price of such common stock as of such date as reported on the OTC
Electronic Bulletin Board.



FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS


CERTAIN STATEMENTS MADE IN THIS ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10K ARE
"FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS" WITHIN THE MEANING OF THE PRIVATE SECURITIES
LITIGATION REFORM ACT OF 1995. FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS CAN BE IDENTIFIED BY
TERMINOLOGY SUCH AS "MAY", "WILL", "SHOULD", "EXPECTS", "INTENDS",
"ANTICIPATES", "BELIEVES", "ESTIMATES", "PREDICTS", OR "CONTINUE" OR THE
NEGATIVE OF THESE TERMS OR OTHER COMPARABLE TERMINOLOGY AND INCLUDE, WITHOUT
LIMITATION, STATEMENTS BELOW REGARDING: THE COMPANY'S EXPECTATIONS AS TO SOURCES
OF REVENUES; THE COMPANY'S INTENDED BUSINESS PLANS; THE COMPANY'S INTENTIONS TO
ACQUIRE OR DEVELOP OTHER TECHNOLOGIES; THE PROSPECTS FOR COMSIGN; BELIEF AS TO
THE SUFFICIENCY OF ITS CASH RESERVES; THE PROSPECTS FOR THE CLOSING OF THE SALE
OF THE COPY PROTECTION BUSINESS; AND THE COMPANY'S PROSPECTS FOR RAISING
ADDITIONAL CAPITAL. BECAUSE FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS INVOLVE RISKS AND
UNCERTAINTIES, THERE ARE IMPORTANT FACTORS THAT COULD CAUSE ACTUAL RESULTS TO
DIFFER MATERIALLY FROM THOSE EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED BY THESE FORWARD-LOOKING
STATEMENTS. THESE FACTORS INCLUDE, BUT ARE NOT LIMITED TO, THE COMPETITIVE
ENVIRONMENT GENERALLY, REASONS FOR THE SALE OF THE COPY PROTECTION BUSINESS,
COMPANY'S DIFFICULTY IN RAISING CAPITAL, POSSIBLE ACTIONS OF THE OFFICE OF CHIEF
SCIENTIST IN CONNECTION WITH THE SALE OF THE COPY PROTECTION BUSINESS,
PROSPECTIVE TAX TREATMENT UNDER U.S. AND OTHER LAW RELATING TO THE SALE OF THE
COPY PROTECTION BUSINESS, COMPANY'S NET OPERATING LOSS CARRYFORWARDS, PROSPECTS
AS TO THE MARKETING OF SAFEAUDIO AND PALLADIUMCD, POTENTIAL INDEMNIFICATION
PAYMENTS UNDER THE PURCHASE AGREEMENT WITH MACROVISION, EFFECTS OF THE SALE OF
THE COPY PROTECTION BUSINESS, REASONS FOR SALE OF THE COPY PROTECTION BUSINESS,
COMPANY'S FUTURE PLANS, SUFFICIENCY OF CASH RESERVES, POSSIBLE INELIGIBLITY TO
TRADE ON THE SUCCESSOR TO THE OTC BULLETIN BOARD OR ANY OTHER OVER-THE-COUNTER
LISTING SERVICE, INABILITY TO ENTER INTO A NEW LINE OF BUSINESS, INEXPERIENCE IN
OPERATING A NEW LINE OF BUSINESS, INSUFFICIENCY OF CAPITAL TO ACQUIRE OR OPERATE
A NEW LINE OF BUSINESS, POSSIBILITY OF INVESTMENT IN A NEW LINE OF BUSINESS
WITHOUT STOCKHOLDER APPROVAL, PERFORMANCE OF COMSIGN, THE AVAILABILITY OF AND
THE TERMS OF FINANCING, POSSIBLE REGULATION UNDER THE INVESTMENT COMPANY ACT,
DILUTION OF THE COMPANY'S STOCKHOLDERS, THE COMPANY'S PAST FINANCIAL HISTORY,
INFLATION, CHANGES IN COSTS AND AVAILABILITY OF GOODS AND SERVICES, ECONOMIC
CONDITIONS IN GENERAL AND IN THE COMPANY'S SPECIFIC MARKET AREAS, DEMOGRAPHIC
CHANGES, CHANGES IN FEDERAL, STATE AND /OR LOCAL GOVERNMENT LAW AND REGULATIONS;
CHANGES IN OPERATING STRATEGY OR DEVELOPMENT PLANS; THE ABILITY TO ATTRACT AND
RETAIN QUALIFIED PERSONNEL; AND CHANGES IN THE COMPANY'S ACQUISITIONS AND
CAPITAL EXPENDITURE PLANS. ALTHOUGH THE COMPANY BELIEVES THAT EXPECTATIONS
REFLECTED IN THE FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS ARE REASONABLE, IT CANNOT GUARANTEE
FUTURE RESULTS, PERFORMANCE OR ACHIEVEMENTS. MOREOVER, NEITHER THE COMPANY NOR
ANY OTHER PERSON ASSUMES RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE ACCURACY AND COMPLETENESS OF
THESE FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS. THE COMPANY IS UNDER NO DUTY TO UPDATE ANY
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS AFTER THE DATE OF THIS REPORT TO CONFORM SUCH
STATEMENTS TO ACTUAL RESULTS.

2


PART I

ITEM 1. BUSINESS.

OVERVIEW

From its inception in 1994 through the period immediately preceding the
date on which the Purchase Agreement discussed below was entered into, TTR
Technologies, Inc. (hereinafter, the "Company" or "TTR") was primarily engaged
in the business of designing and developing digital security technologies that
provide copy protection for electronic content distributed on optical media and
the internet (the "Copy Protection Business"). Optical media include compact
discs (CDs), digital versatile discs (DVDs) and DVDs that store software,
including games and reference material (DVD-ROMs). From inception through
December 31, 2002, the Company incurred net losses approximating $40 million and
generated revenues aggregating less than $150,000.

In November 1999, the Company entered into the Alliance Agreement with
Macrovision Corporation ("Macrovision"), as subsequently amended (the "Alliance
Agreement"), to jointly design and develop a copy protection product designed to
thwart the illegal copying of audio content on CDs. The new product was marketed
by Macrovision under the brand name "SAFEAUDIO". Under the Alliance Agreement,
the Company granted to Macrovision an exclusive world-wide royalty bearing
license, through December 2009, to the technologies underlying SAFEAUDIO, as
well as all other technologies and products jointly developed, that are designed
to prevent the illicit duplication of audio programs (including the audio
portion of music videos, movies and other video or audio content) distributed on
optical media (not limited to CDs and DVDs) and technologies for Internet
digital rights management for audio applications. Macrovision was responsible
for the marketing of SAFEAUDIO and determined, at its sole discretion, the
staffing and other resources to be allocated to the product's commercialization.

Under the Alliance Agreement, the Company is entitled to royalties of
thirty percent (30%) of the net revenues collected by Macrovision or its
affiliates from any products or components incorporating SAFEAUDIO or other
jointly developed music protection technology.

To date, no significant revenues have been generated by SAFEAUDIO.

Prior to the commencement of the joint development efforts with Macrovision
respecting the technology underlying SAFEAUDIO, the Company designed and
developed DISCGUARD, an anti-copying technology intended for software content
distributed on CDs, which became commercially available in 1999. The Company
recorded insignificant revenues from DISCGUARD in 1999. Pursuant to the Alliance
Agreement, the Company granted to Macrovision an exclusive license to develop
and market the technology underlying the Company's DISCGUARD product. The
DISCGUARD license was non-royalty bearing with respect to the CD and DVD
signatures and royalty bearing as to the other components only with respect to
revenues collected in the People's Republic of China through 2004. To date, the
Company has not received any royalties in respect of the DISCGUARD license.

In November 2001, the Company began to design and develop copy protection
solutions designed to allow consumers relative freedom and ease in utilizing
copy protected discs and music files downloaded from the Internet. These
solutions, tentatively referred to as the PALLADIUMCD product line, were in
various stages of design, development and testing at the time that the Purchase
Agreement was entered into.

AGREEMENT FOR SALE OF OPERATING BUSINESS

On November 4, 2002, the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiary TTR
Technologies, Ltd. ("TTR Ltd."), entered into an Asset Purchase Agreement dated
as of

3


November 4, 2002, (the "Purchase Agreement") with Macrovision, one of the
Company's largest stockholders and Macrovision Europe, Ltd., an affiliate of
Macrovision (collectively, the "Purchaser"), pursuant to which the Company
agreed to sell to the Purchaser all of the assets that were utilized in
operating the Copy Protection Business. The Copy Protection Business includes
the technologies underlying SAFEAUDIO and the tentatively named PALLADIUMCD
product line.

Under the terms of the Purchase Agreement, the Company is to receive at
closing an aggregate cash consideration of $5.25 million, with certain downward
adjustments to not exceed $400,000, as well as the endorsement and delivery to
the Company, for eventual cancellation and return to the Company's treasury, of
the stock certificate representing 1,880,937 shares of the Company's common
stock, par value $0.001 (the "Common Stock") that Macrovision purchased from the
Company in January 2000 in connection with its then concluded equity investment
in the Company of $4 million. Additionally, under the terms of the Purchase
Agreement, upon closing, the Alliance Agreement entered into by the Company and
Macrovision, pursuant to which the Company is entitled to a 30% royalty of the
net revenues collected by Macrovision or its affiliates from any product or
component incorporating the technologies underlying SAFEAUDIO, will terminate
and be of no continuing legal effect.

On December 10, 2002, the Company filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission ("SEC") a definitive proxy statement (the "Proxy Statement")
soliciting stockholder approval for the sale of the Copy Protection Business
pursuant to the terms of the Purchase Agreement. A special meeting of the
stockholders was scheduled for January 13, 2003, which was subsequently
adjourned to January 15, 2003 (the "Special Stockholders Meeting"), at which the
Company's stockholders approved the sale of the Copy Protection Business. At the
Special Stockholders Meeting, the stockholders also approved a resolution
granting to the Company's board of directors (the "Board") the authority to
effect a reverse stock split of the Company's Common Stock in the range of 1:6
to 1:10, as determined in the sole discretion of the Board, at any time on or
before the Company's 2003 annual meeting of the stockholders.

The Purchase Agreement contemplated that the specified conditions to
closing were to have occurred on or before March 15, 2003. One of the closing
conditions relates to the procurement of the consent and waiver by the Office of
the Chief Scientist of the Israeli Ministry of Trade and Commerce ("OCS") to the
transfer to the Purchaser of certain technologies included in the assets
designated under the agreement (the "Consent"). The OCS did not furnish the
required Consent on the basis of its contention, following examinations made by
it, that certain of the technologies to be transferred to the Purchaser may have
been developed with OCS funds advanced to TTR Ltd. in 1996-1997, a contention
with which the Company does not agree.

In order to facilitate the sale of the Copy Protection Business as
contemplated by the Purchase Agreement, an application prepared by the Company
and Macrovision was made to the OCS on March 9, 2003 to transfer to an Israeli
affiliate of Macrovision ("Macrovision Israel") certain of the technologies that
were developed with OCS funding (the "Subject Technologies"). As of the date of
the filing of this report, the OCS has not yet responded to the application.

As described in the Proxy Statement and in the special report on Form 8-K
filed with the SEC on March 14, 2003, certain rights to terminate the Purchase
Agreement arise if the transactions contemplated by that agreement are not
consummated by March 15, 2003. Since the transactions contemplated under the
Purchase Agreement were not consummated by such date, neither the Company nor
the Purchaser is contractually bound to consummate such transactions.

4


No assurance can be provided that the OCS will in fact agree to the
transfer of the Subject Technologies to Macrovision Israel or that the sale of
the Company's Copy Protection Business as contemplated under the Purchase
Agreement will in fact be consummated or otherwise be concluded.

For a more detailed discussion of the Purchase Agreement and the sale of
the Copy Protection Business, reference is made to the Proxy Statement.

CURRENT ACTIVITIES

The Company terminated active on-going operations in the copy protection
area following the execution of the Purchase Agreement.

If the sale of the Copy Protection Business contemplated under the Purchase
Agreement is not consummated within the second quarter of 2003, then management
anticipates that it will, initially, attempt to reach an agreement with
Macrovision as to the parties' rights respecting the jointly developed
technologies. In the absence of any such agreement, the Company anticipates that
it may commence legal process against Macrovision in order to defend the
Company's interests and assert its rights under the Alliance Agreement.
Additionally, management anticipates that it may attempt to resume its marketing
efforts with respect to its PALLADIUMCD product line.

However, in order to effectively defend the Company's interests and assert
its rights under the Alliance Agreement, management anticipates that it will
need to raise additional cash significantly in excess of the $653,885 in
available cash that the Company had as of December 31, 2002. Due primarily to
expenses incurred in connection with the continuing defense of on-going lawsuits
described in item 3 of this report, management believes that its available cash
resources as of the filing of this report to be significantly less than amount
reported for year end 2002. The Company has no present financing commitments.
While management is actively investigating several options to raise capital, no
assurance can be given that the Company will be able to raise any funds on
commercially reasonable basis. If the Company is unable to secure such financing
on commercially reasonable terms, it may not be able to continue its operations.
Management anticipates that any successful financing that it may be able to
obtain will result in significant dilution to present stockholders.

If the sale of the Copy Protection Business is in fact consummated as
contemplated under the Purchase Agreement, the Company's only significant asset
following such closing will be cash and cash equivalents. Management estimates
that the Company and its subsidiary TTR Ltd. has at December 31, 2002, a net
operating loss carryforward (NOL) of approximately $27 million that may be
available to offset future United States and Israeli taxable income, subject to
certain specified limitations under applicable law. If the sale of the Copy
Protection Business is concluded as contemplated under the Purchase Agreement,
the Company will no longer be engaged in the copy protection area.

The Company's board of directors (the "Board") has not yet determined the
Company's strategic direction following the consummation, if any, of the sale of
the Copy Protection Business and is considering several possible general
alternatives. Currently, the Company anticipates pursuing one of the following
three directions: liquidation and dissolution, retention of the proceeds and
acquisition, investment in, or development of new lines of business, or a
partial distribution of cash and acquisition, investment in, or development of
new lines of business. Among the alternatives currently being actively
considered is entering into new lines of business through specific strategic
acquisitions. While the Company has no current binding agreements with respect
to any acquisition, it is actively exploring acquisition transactions.

5


REASONS UNDERLYING THE PURCHASE AGREEMENT

As previously disclosed in the Company's Proxy Statement, the Board
considered several factors in arriving at its decision to recommend to the
Company's stockholders that the Copy Protection Business be sold to Macrovision
or its designees.

At the time that the Purchase Agreement was entered into, there was no
active market in the music industry for copy protection solutions. Despite
expectation to the contrary, recording studios and music publishers did not
widely adopt anti-copying solutions or technologies designed to protect the
proprietary rights of music publishers and artists. At the time of the sale of
the Copy Protection Business, no significant revenues were generated by
SAFEAUDIO and none were expected in the near term, based on the uncertain
prospects of the industry. At the time that the Purchase Agreement was entered
into, the Company had, based on the quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended September 30, 2002, approximately $1.5 million in cash and its
cash resources were rapidly diminishing, despite efforts to reduce operating
expenses.

As detailed in the Proxy Statement and as disclosed in previous public
filings, the Company's relationship with Macrovision was seriously hampered by
divergent views and expectations. Additionally, under the terms of the Alliance
Agreement, the terms of which governed the relationship between the Company and
Macrovision, the Company was not entitled to the 30% royalty with respect to any
Macrovision digital rights management (DRM) solution/product that is bundled
with the technology underlying SAFEAUDIO. Macrovision advised the Company's
management that, in furtherance of its marketing efforts, it intended to append
to SAFEAUDIO various other complementary and related products/components, which
initially would include primarily DRM products that were not the subject of
joint development. Concurrent with the entry into the Purchase Agreement,
Macrovision announced the acquisition of the assets of one of the Company's then
leading competitors in the Copy Protection Business, with a vast array of
technology/products/components related to music copy protection and DRM.
Consequently, the Company's management anticipated that the royalties payable in
respect of any anticipated SAFEAUDIO based 'music protection product package'
would progressively diminish as additional Macrovision complementary technology
(internally developed or further acquired) or related products/components that
were not the subject of joint development were bundled in. The anticipated
result was that the royalties payable in respect of any anticipated SAFEAUDIO
based product package would progressively diminish. Moreover, as previously
disclosed by the Company in the Proxy Statement and earlier filings with the
SEC, the relationship with Macrovision impaired the Company's attempts to raise
capital.

In May 2002, Daniel C. Stein, the Company's then newly hired Chief
Executive Officer and Sam Brill, the Company's Chief Operating Officer,
initiated discussions with senior Macrovision executives in an attempt to
resolve the parties' differences and coordinate their respective efforts toward
the rapid introduction and acceptance by the industry of SAFEAUDIO. As
previously disclosed in the Proxy Statement, the Company and Macrovision were
unable to resolve the issues between them in a mutually acceptable manner and,
accordingly, the focus of the discussions between the Company and Macrovision
focused on the terms relating to a satisfactory parting.

After considering the options available to the Company, the Company's newly
installed Board, following its election in August 2002, concluded that a sale of
the Copy Protection Business to Macrovision would be in the best interests of
the Company and its stockholders. The Board has approved the sale of the Copy
Protection Business primarily for the following reasons: (i) to avoid the then
continuing losses associated with its research and development associated with
continuing the Copy Protection Business; (ii) the uncertain prospects of
continuing in such business and for the copy protection market in general; (iii)
to obviate the need by the Company to undertake the risk of litigating its
rights under the Alliance Agreement with Macrovision, the outcome of which may
be unfavorable and costly; (iv)

6


difficulty in raising cash to continue the Copy Protection Business as then
conducted; and (v) to provide the Company with capital resources to consider and
assess other opportunities that the Board believes may afford a superior
opportunity for rapid growth and revenues compared to the Copy Protection
Business.

For a more detailed description of the reasons and events underlying and
surrounding the Sale of the Copy Protection Business, reference is made to the
Proxy Statement.

MANAGEMENT RESTRUCTURE

In the course of 2002, the Company's senior management was reorganized. The
Company's Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Daniel C. Stein, was hired in May 2002.
Prior to Mr. Stein's appointment, the chief executive position was held since
its inception in 1994 by Mr. Marc D. Tokayer, the Company's Chairman and one of
its founders. Upon Mr. Stein's appointment as Chief Executive Officer, Mr.
Tokayer became the Company President and general manager of TTR Ltd.

At the Company's 2002 annual meeting of the stockholders held in August
2002, the Company's stockholders installed a new Board comprised of Daniel C.
Stein, the Company's Chief Executive Officer and President, Sam Brill, the
Company's Chief Operating Officer, Mr. Marc D. Tokayer, Richard Gottehrer,
Michael Paolucci, Joel Schoenfeld and Neil Subin. Mr. Tokayer resigned from his
directorship in September 2002. Mr. Brill, who was elected to the Board in April
2002, served on the previous board of directors.

EMPLOYEES

The Company employs two full-time employees, its Chief Executive Officer
and the Chief Operating Officer, as well as one part-time employee.

As previously disclosed in the Company's quarterly report on Form 10-Q for
the quarter ended September 30, 2002, consistent with the Board's policy to
significantly reduce operating expenses, in September 2002 the Company began the
relocation to the United States of its research, development and design
activities and, in consequence thereof, terminated by October 2002 all such
activities formerly carried out at the TTR Ltd. facility (the "TTR Ltd.
Wind-down"). Following the execution of the Purchase Agreement, the Company
effectively ceased to be engaged in the Copy Protection Business.

As a consequence thereof, the number of personnel employed by the Company
has significantly declined. Immediately prior to the TTR Ltd. Wind-down, the
Company employed approximately 16 full time employees, most of whom were
research and development and design personnel working out of TTR Ltd.'s
facility.

MINORITY SUBSIDIARY

In July 2000, the Company purchased a 50% equity interest in ComSign Ltd.
"ComSign"), an Israeli based company which is the exclusive marketer in Israel
and in the territories controlled by the Palestinian Authority of VeriSign
Inc.'s digital authentication certificates and related services. The remaining
50% equity interest in ComSign continued to be held by a private company based
in Israel. VeriSign, Inc. is a leading provider of Internet based trust
services. The agreement between ComSign and VeriSign provides ComSign with the
rights to market these services in the designated territory for a period of six
years and a sharing of revenues derived from these activities.

The Company disclosed in its quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended June 30, 2002 that it wrote-off the goodwill portion of its investment in
ComSign, as the Company believed that there was a significant decrease in the
fair market value of its investment for reasons relating primarily to the
non-resolution of certain issues between the ComSign and VeriSign, including the

7


contract fees payable by ComSign under the terms of the license agreement, and
the general decrease in market demand, thereby impairing the value of the
investment. Consequently, during the year ended December 31, 2002, the Company
wrote-off the amount of $748,690, representing the remaining goodwill and the
balance of its investment in ComSign.

RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT

As noted elsewhere in this report, following the execution in November 2002
of the Purchase Agreement, the Company ceased all research and development
activities.

From the date of its inception through December 31, 2002, the Company
incurred approximately $5.7 million on research and development activities,
including approximately $700,000 for the year ended December 31, 2002 and
approximately $950,000 for the year ended December 31, 2001. The amounts
incurred in 2002 were used primarily for the enhancement of SAFEAUDIO,
developing and expanding DVD anti-copying protection and security technologies
relating to files downloaded from the Internet.

From its inception in 1994 through October 2002, all of the Company's
research and design activities were carried out in Israel through TTR Ltd. As
previously disclosed in the Company's quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended September 30, 2002, following the completion of the TTR Ltd.
Wind-down in October 2002, the Company terminated all such activities formerly
carried out at the TTR Ltd. facility.

COMPETITION

At the time that the Company was engaged in the Copy Protection Business,
there were, to management's knowledge, three other companies active in the field
of designing and developing technology designed to prevent the unauthorized
copying of compact discs. MidbarTech, a private Israeli company, had a solution
that has been, to management's knowledge, tested by the major labels in Europe
and the United States and was then marketed under the trade name "Cactus Data
Shield". In November 2002, the assets of MidbarTech were also sold to
Macrovision. Sony also had a product that it was marketing to the industry under
the trade name "Key2Audio". SunnComm, a U.S. based company whose securities are
traded on the over-the-counter market, publicly announced that its CD anti-copy
technology has been applied to various music CDs.

In the event that the sale of the Copy Protection Business under the
Purchase Agreement is not consummated and the Company decides to resume limited
operations in the copy protection area, then there can be no assurance that
these or other technologies will not become more widely accepted than the
technologies that the Company will be then marketing or that other companies
will not enter the market in the future. There can be no assurance that
companies with substantially greater financial, technological, marketing,
personnel and research and development resources than those available to the
Company will not develop and begin marketing a similar technology.

COMPANY HISTORY AND BACKGROUND

The Company was incorporated under Delaware law in July 1994. The principal
executive offices of the Company are located at 575 Lexington Avenue, Suite 400,
New York, New York, 10022.

RISK FACTORS

In addition to the other information contained in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K, investors should consider carefully the following risks. If any of
these risks occurs, our business, financial condition or operating results could
be adversely affected.

8


THE CONTEMPLATED SALE OF THE COPY PROTECTION BUSINESS UNDER THE PURCHASE
AGREEMENT WITH MACROVISION MAY NOT BE CONSUMMATED.

Under the terms of the Purchase Agreement, if the sale of the Copy
Protection Business was not consummated by March 15, 2003, either the Company or
Macrovision is entitled to terminate such agreement at any time.

If the sale of the Copy Protection Business is not in fact consummated as
contemplated under the Purchase Agreement, then such development will have a
material adverse effect on the Company's condition and prospects.

IF THE CONTEMPLATED SALE OF THE COPY PROTECTION BUSINESS IS NOT
CONSUMMATED, THE COMPANY WILL NEED TO IMMEDIATELY RAISE ADDITIONAL CAPITAL, WITH
THE LIKELIHOOD OF SIGNIFICANT DILUTION RESULTING TO STOCKHOLDERS.

As of December 31, 2002, the Company had $653,885 in cash available. Due
primarily to expenses incurred in connection with the continuing defense of
on-going lawsuits described in item 3 of this report, management believes that
the available cash as of the filing of this report to be significantly less than
amount reported for year-end December 2002. In the absence of a consummation of
the sale of the Copy Protection Business within the second quarter of 2003,
management anticipates that it will need to raise additional cash significantly
in excess of the amount it currently has in order to defend the Company's
interests and assert its rights under Alliance Agreement with Macrovision and to
take other necessary actions in the copy protection area. The Company has no
commitments for any funds and no assurance can be given that the Company will be
able to raise any funds on commercially reasonable basis. If the Company is
unable to secure such financing on commercially reasonable terms, it will not be
able to continue its operations. Any successful financing will have a
significant dilutive effect on current stockholders.

The inability to raise the necessary financing by the end of the second
quarter of 2003 may require management to initiate proceedings seeking
protection under pertinent reorganization or bankruptcy law. The inability to
raise the required funds will likely have a material adverse effect on the
Company's condition and prospects.

In the event that the Company were to successfully raise additional cash,
management believes that such financing will result in a significant dilution of
the present stockholders.

"GOING CONCERN" QUALIFICATION IN AUDITOR'S REPORT MAY MAKE IT DIFFICULT TO
RAISE NEW CAPITAL.

The report of the independent auditors on the Company's financial
statements for the year ended December 31, 2002 includes an explanatory
paragraph relating to the uncertainty of the Company's ability to continue as a
going concern. The Company anticipates that the "going concern" qualification
will make it more difficult for the Company to raise additional capital.

THE OUTCOME OF ANY ACTION TAKEN BY THE COMPANY TO DEFEND ITS INTERESTS
UNDER THE ALLIANCE AGREEMENT WITH MACROVISION IS UNCERTAIN.

In the event that the contemplated sale of the Copy Protection Business
does not close within the second quarter of 2003, management believes that it
may need to initiate proceedings of a legal nature against Macrovision in order
to adequately defend the Company's interests and assert its rights under the
Alliance Agreement with Macrovision. In addition, the Company will need to
consider the future course of its action within the Copy Protection Business
arena.

9


Management anticipates that the initiation of legal process against
Macrovision is likely to be costly, time consuming and the outcome of such
actions is uncertain.

IF THE SALE OF THE COPY PROTECTION BUSINESS UNDER THE PURCHASE AGREEMENT
WITH MACROVISION IS NOT CONSUMMATED, NO ASSURANCE CAN BE PROVIDED THAT OTHER
POTENTIAL ACQUIRORS WILL SEEK TO PURCHASE THE COPY PROTECTION BUSINESS.

If the sale of the Copy Protection Business is not consummated, it is
unlikely that the Company will be able to find another purchaser for the Copy
Protection Business. Under the Alliance Agreement with Macrovision, which
agreement is in effect until (and subject to) the consummation of the sale of
the Copy Protection Business, any such transaction cannot be effected without
the approval of Macrovision. Accordingly, it is unlikely that any company
currently engaged in this business would have any interest, or would be willing
to offer a reasonable purchase price for the Company's Copy Protection Business.

IF THE SALE OF THE COPY PROTECTION BUSINESS IS NOT CONSUMMATED, IT WILL BE
DIFFICULT FOR THE COMPANY TO RE-ENTER THE COPY PROTECTION FIELD.

As of the execution of the Purchase Agreement in November 2002, the Company
ceased active operations in the copy protection area. While management
anticipates that it may attempt to revive the previously abandoned limited
marketing efforts with respect to PALLADIUMCD, management anticipates that such
action will be difficult and may be hampered by claims that Macrovision may
raise with respect to claims and rights respecting the PALLADIUMCD product line.
The taking of any action by the Company to terminate the Alliance Agreement and
to market the technologies jointly developed with Macrovision is likely to
encounter significant resistance from Macrovision. Additionally, if the Company
does in fact re-enter the copy protection area, it will face significant
competition from companies with vastly greater resources. Management does not
believe that the Company currently has sufficient cash resources to undertake
any such significant marketing efforts and neither does the Company have any
significant financing commitments with respect thereto.

EVEN IF THE SALE OF THE COPY PROTECTION BUSINESS IS CONSUMMATED, THE
COMPANY WILL NOT, POST-CLOSING, ENGAGE IN ON-GOING BUSINESS OPERATIONS AND WILL
CONTINUE TO HAVE HAD A HISTORY OF NET OPERATING LOSSES.

Even if the sale of the Copy Protection Business is consummated, the
Company's ability to generate revenue and achieve profitability or positive cash
flow will depend upon its success in or acquiring or developing a new profitable
line of business. The Company may not have the capital necessary to develop or
invest in new lines of business. There can be no assurance that the Company will
ever generate revenues and, if it ever does, that the levels of revenues will
allow the Company to become profitable. Since TTR began operations in 1994, the
Company has lost money in every quarter and year. As of December 31, 2002, the
Company had an accumulated deficit of approximately $40 million. The Company had
no revenues in 2002. After terminating all research and development relating to
its Copy Protection Business, the Company has not been engaged in active
business operations.

Accordingly, the Company's prospects must be considered with regard to the
risks encountered by a company in the early stages of development.

If the Company cannot achieve and sustain operating profitability or
positive cash flow from operations, it could have a significant adverse effect
on the Company's condition and prospects.

EVEN IF THE SALE OF THE COPY PROTECTION BUSINESS IS CONSUMMATED, THE
COMPANY MAY NEED ADDITIONAL CAPITAL TO ACQUIRE OR DEVELOP A PROFITABLE NEW
BUSINESS.

10


Even if the sale of the Copy Protection Business is consummated as
contemplated under the Purchase Agreement, the Company may need substantial
capital to develop and expand a new business, fund operating losses and to
provide for working capital. The Company's ability to raise additional capital
will depend on, among other things, its financial condition at the time and
other factors, including market conditions that are beyond the Company's
control. There can be no assurance that the Company can complete such financing
or that the terms thereof would be favorable to the Company. Any such inability
to obtain additional funds on acceptable terms may have a material adverse
effect on the Company's financial condition.

IF THE SALE OF THE COPY PROTECTION IS CONSUMMATED, THE COMPANY MAY INVEST
IN A NEW BUSINESS WITHOUT FURTHER STOCKHOLDER ACTION.

Following the consummation, if any, of the sale of the Copy Protection
Business, the Company will not been engaged in on-going operations. The Company
anticipates that it will explore entering into new lines of business through
specific strategic acquisitions. While the Company has no current binding
agreements with respect to any acquisition, it is actively exploring acquisition
and/or investment transactions.

Under certain conditions, the Company's Board is not required to seek
stockholder approval respecting any decision to invest in another business.
Thus, the Company's board of directors may decide to invest in another business
without any further input from stockholders.

Additionally, the Company's only full-time employees, Mr. Daniel C. Stein,
the Company's Chief Executive Officer and President and Mr. Sam Brill, Chief
Operating Officer, may have limited experience and expertise running and
managing a business in the area or field in which any acquisition is made.

IF THE SALE OF THE COPY PROTECTION BUSINESS IS CONSUMMATED, THE COMPANY MAY
BE REQUIRED TO PAY SIGNIFICANT AMOUNTS TO MACROVISION WITH RESPECT TO
INDEMNITIES.

Under the Purchase Agreement respecting the sale of the Copy Protection
Business, the Company undertook to indemnify Macrovision for certain losses as
set forth in the Purchase Agreement. The Company's indemnification obligations
are limited by an overall cap of $5.25 million, except with respect to matters
relating to the OCS, violation of any bulk sales laws, fraudulent conveyance
laws, or certain pre-sale contractual liabilities. Thus, under the Purchase
Agreement, the Purchaser is entitled to seek reimbursement for any amounts paid
to the OCS in respect of obtaining the OCS's release to any claims or rights to
the Subject Technologies. The payment of any such indemnification obligations
may adversely impact the Company's cash resources and materially adversely
affect its business and prospects.

THE COMPANY'S COMMON STOCK WAS DELISTED FROM THE NASDAQ NATIONAL MARKET AND
IS SIGNIFICANTLY LESS LIQUID THAN BEFORE.

The Company's Common Stock was delisted from trading on the Nasdaq National
Market on January 8, 2003 due to the fact that the Company was unable to satisfy
the criteria for continued listing. The Company's request to transfer to The
Nasdaq SmallCap Market was denied. The Company's Common Stock currently trades
on the OTC Bulletin Board.

The OTC Bulletin Board is separate and distinct from The Nasdaq Stock
Market. Although the OTCBB is a regulated quotation service operated by The
Nasdaq Stock Market that displays real-time quotes, last sale prices, and volume
information in over-the-counter equity securities like the Company's Common
Stock, the Company is not required to meet or maintain any qualitative or
quantitative standards for its Common Stock to be traded on the OTCBB. The
Company's Common Stock does not presently meet the minimum listing standards for
listing on The Nasdaq Stock Market.

11


As a result of the delisting, the Company believes that the ability of
stockholders to buy and sell the shares of the Company's Common Stock has been
materially impaired, and is limited primarily to over-the-counter quotation
services that handle high-risk ventures.

THE COMPANY'S COMMON STOCK HAS EXPERIENCED IN THE PAST, AND IS EXPECTED TO
EXPERIENCE IN THE FUTURE, SIGNIFICANT PRICE AND VOLUME VOLATILITY, WHICH
SUBSTANTIALLY INCREASE THE RISK OF LOSS TO PERSONS OWNING THE COMPANY'S COMMON
STOCK.

Because of the limited trading market for the Company's Common Stock, and
because of the possible price volatility, a stockholder may not be able to
purchase or sell shares of the Company's Common Stock when he/she/it desires to
do so. The inability to sell shares in a rapidly declining market may
substantially increase an investor's risk of loss because of such illiquidity
and because the price for the Company's Common Stock may suffer greater declines
because of its price volatility.

THE COMPANY MAY NOT BE ALLOWED TO TRADE ON THE SUCCESSOR TO THE OTC
BULLETIN BOARD AND MAY BECOME SIGNIFICANTLY LESS LIQUID THAN BEFORE.

The Company may not qualify for a listing on the BBX (Bulletin Board
Exchange) which is, during 2003, slated to replace the OTC Bulletin Board. The
BBX, a new market owned and operated by the Nasdaq Stock Market, is scheduled to
have qualitative and quantitative listing standards that the Company may not be
able to satisfy.

In the event that the Company does not qualify to be listed on the BBX, the
Company believes that the ability of stockholders to buy and sell the shares of
the Company's Common Stock will be materially impaired, and will be limited
primarily to over-the-counter quotation services such as the Pink Sheets.

THERE MAY BE SIGNIFICANT LIMITATIONS TO THE UTILIZATION OF NET OPERATING
LOSSES TO OFFSET FUTURE TAXABLE INCOME.

Management estimates that the Company has a net operating loss
carry-forward (NOL) of approximately $16 million, which will be available to
offset future U.S. taxable income subject to limitations under Section 382 of
the Internal Revenue Code pertaining to changes in stock ownership. TTR Ltd.,
the Company's wholly owned Israeli subsidiary, has a net operating loss
carryforward of approximately $11 million available to offset future taxable
income in Israel.

No assurance can be provided that under prevailing law all, or even any
part, of the NOL will be available to offset future income.

THE COMPANY MAY BE SUBJECT TO LEGAL PROCEEDINGS BY THE OCS.

An application was filed with the OCS to consent to the transfer to an
Israeli affiliate of Macrovision of the Subject Technologies. As of the filing
of this report, no response has been received from the OCS. Although it is the
Company's position that none of the technologies included in the sale of the
Copy Protection Business that are to be transferred to Macrovision, or to a
non-Israeli affiliate thereof, were in fact funded by the OCS, the OCS may adopt
a contrary view that, upon the closing of the Purchase Agreement or thereafter,
could expose the Company to a damage suit by the OCS, which could result in a
material adverse effect to the Company's business and prospects.

IF THE SALE OF THE COPY PROTECTION BUSINESS IS CONSUMMATED, THE COMPANY MAY
THEN BE SUBJECT TO REGULATION UNDER THE INVESTMENT COMPANY ACT

If the sale of the Copy Protection Business is closed as contemplated under
the

12


Purchase Agreement with Macrovision, following such sale, the Company's only
significant asset will be cash and cash equivalents. Although the Company is
subject to regulation under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and the
Securities Act of 1934, as amended, management believes that, following a
closing, if any, of the sale of the Copy Protection Business, the Company will
not be subject to regulation under the Investment Act of 1940, as amended (the
"Investment Company Act") insofar as it is not anticipated that it will then be
engaged in the business of investing or trading in securities. In the event that
the Company engages in business combinations which result in its holding passive
investment interests in a number of entities or in the event that it unable to
commence operations in a new line of business for a substantial period of time,
it could be required to register as an investment company and be subject to
registration under the Investment Company Act. In such an event, the Company
could incur significant registration and compliance costs and would be subject
to extensive regulation.

IT MAY BE DIFFICULT FOR A THIRD PARTY TO ACQUIRE THE COMPANY.

Provisions of Delaware law could make it more difficult for a third party
to acquire the Company, even if it would be beneficial to the Company's
stockholders.

PENNY STOCK REGULATIONS ARE APPLICABLE TO INVESTMENT IN SHARES OF THE
COMPANY'S COMMON STOCK.

Broker-dealer practices in connection with transactions in "penny stocks"
are regulated by certain penny stock rules adopted by the Securities and
Exchange Commission. Penny stocks generally are equity securities with a price
of less than $5.00 (other than securities registered on certain national
securities exchanges or quoted on the Nasdaq system, provided that current
prices and volume information with respect to transactions in such securities
are provided by the exchange or system). The penny stock rules require a
broker-dealer, prior to a transaction in a penny stock not otherwise exempt from
the rules, to deliver a standardized risk disclosure document that provides
information about penny stocks and the risks in the penny stock market. The
broker-dealer also must provide the customer with current bid and offer
quotations for the penny stock, the compensation of the broker-dealer and its
salesperson in the transaction, and monthly account statements showing the
market value of each penny stock held in the customer's account. In addition,
the penny stock rules generally require that prior to a transaction in a penny
stock the broker-dealer make a special written determination that the penny
stock is a suitable investment for the purchaser and receive the purchaser's
written agreement to the transaction. These disclosure requirements may have the
effect of reducing the level of trading activity in the secondary market for a
stock that becomes subject to the penny stock rules. Many brokers will not deal
with penny stocks; this restricts the market.

ITEM 2. PROPERTIES.

The Company leases office space in midtown Manhattan, New York, for its
executive and administrative activities. The office lease expired in January
2003 and the Company is currently on a month-to-month lease. The Company pays
monthly rent payments of approximately $4,000. Management believes that the
Company will be able either to renew the present lease or obtain suitable
replacement facilities.

Until the TTR Ltd. Wind-down in October 2002, the Company utilized a 2,531
square foot facility used in its research and development and administrative
activities in Kfar Saba, Israel, where the lease commenced on April 1, 2002 and
by its terms expires on March 31, 2003. The Company paid out the entire term of
the lease. Under the lease, the Company paid monthly rent of approximately
$3,000.

ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS.

13


The Company is involved in the following legal proceedings.

On August 14, 2002, nine purported stockholders of the Company filed a
complaint against the Company, eight of its current or former officers and
several third parties in the United States District Court for the Southern
District of New York. The action, which is known as EILENBERG ET AL. V. KRONITZ
ET AL. (02 Civ. 6502), alleges, among other things, that the Company issued a
series of false and misleading statements, including press releases, that misled
the plaintiffs' into purchasing the Company's Common Stock. The complaint seeks
relief under federal securities laws and common law, and demands compensatory
damages of $10 million or more, and punitive damages of $50 million or more. The
Company believes it has meritorious defenses to this lawsuit. The Company and
most of its current or former officers have filed a motion based upon the
federal securities laws to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a claim
and to plead with particularity under Rule 9(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil
Procedure. After hearing arguments on November 26, 2002, the Court granted
defendants' motion to dismiss the complaint based on Rule 9(b). Plaintiffs filed
an amended complaint, and the Company's time to respond has been extended to
April 14, 2003. The litigation is thus in its preliminary stages and no
substantive discovery has been conducted in the case.

Counsel for the EILENBERG plaintiffs filed a second action against the
Company and several of its current or former officers in the same court on
August 21, 2002, this time on behalf of three additional purported stockholders
as plaintiffs. This action, which is known as STURM ET AL. V. TOKAYER ET AL.
(602 Civ. 6672), alleged, among other things, that the Company had violated the
federal securities laws by distributing false and misleading materials in
connection with the annual shareholder meeting scheduled for August 26, 2002,
and that several officers and directors had breached duties to the Company and
committed acts of waste and mismanagement by paying excessive salaries to
themselves and others. Plaintiffs promptly moved for a temporary restraining
order to enjoin the annual shareholder meeting from being conducted on August
26, 2002. The Court denied this motion. The Company believes it has meritorious
defenses to this lawsuit. The Company and the other defendants thereafter moved
to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a claim for relief. In response,
the plaintiffs filed an amended complaint, which deleted the prior claims
concerning violations of the federal securities laws, but continued to assert
derivative claims for waste and mismanagement. The Court denied defendants'
motion to dismiss the latter claims but directed that plaintiffs submit a more
detailed verification to the Amended Complaint and correct an allegation
concerning one of the defendants. Plaintiffs have served their Second verified
and Amended Complaint and the Company and the other defendants have until April
14, 2003 to answer or otherwise respond to the Second Amended Complaint. The
litigation is thus in its preliminary stages and no substantive discovery has
been conducted in the case.

On or about December 31, 2002, the same counsel "purporting to represent
"certain shareholders" wrote to Company counsel demanding, among other things,
that the salaries and benefits of the Company's Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Operating Officer be reduced or, in the alternative, they be terminated
for alleged cause. Plaintiffs' claims have been referred by the Company's board
of directors to a Special Litigation Committee of the board which is
investigating the matter and whose report is expected on or about May 31, 2003.

The Company has notified the insurer that issued a directors and officers
liability policy to the Company covering the period in which the filing of the
Eilenberg and Sturm actions occurred. The Company is seeking, among other
things, to recover its costs of defense to the extent provided in the policy and
has entered into an Interim Funding Agreement with the insurer pursuant to which
its costs are to be reimbursed under a full reservation of rights by the
insurer.

The Company's former attorneys commenced an action in the state court in
New York

14


in January 2003 seeking unpaid legal fees in the approximate amount of $300,000.
The Company's answer denies the complaint's material allegations and alleges as
defenses that it was over-billed in unreasonable amounts and otherwise damaged
by the law firm's failure to advise properly in the shareholder litigation
brought by Sturm et al. The case is in the discovery stage.

As of December 31, 2002, it is not possible to estimate the liability, if
any, in connection with these matters. Accordingly, no accruals for these
contingencies have been recorded.

From time to time the Company has been involved in other disputes and legal
actions arising in the ordinary course of business. In management's opinion,
none of these other disputes and legal actions is expected to have a material
impact on the Company's business or cash flow.

ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS.

On December 10, 2002, the Company filed with the SEC a definitive proxy
statement soliciting stockholder approval as to the following: (i) to approve
the sale to Macrovision and certain of its affiliates of the assets that relate
in any material respect to the Company's Copy Protection Business and (ii) to
approve an amendment to the Company's amended and restated certificate of
incorporation to effect a reverse stock split of the Company's Common Stock in
the range of 1:6 to 1:10, as determined in the sole discretion of the Board, at
any time on or before the Company's 2003 annual meeting of the stockholders (the
"Reverse Split").

The Company scheduled a special meeting (the "Special Meeting") of the
Company's stockholders for January 13, 2003. The Special Meeting was adjourned
to January 15, 2003. The voting results at the Special Meeting were as follows:

For Against Abstained
1. Asset Sale 9,334,235 158,200 2,315,392

2. Reverse Split 13,286,729 1,192,089 2,362,792

Each of the above proposals were approved at the Special Meeting.

PART II

ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS.

As of January 8, 2003, the Company's common stock, par value $0.001 per
share (the "Common Stock") began to be quoted on the OTC Electronic Bulletin
Board under the symbol "TTRE". From February 6, 2001 through January 7, 2003,
the Common Stock was quoted on the NASDAQ National Market. Prior to its
quotation of the NASDAQ National Market, the Company's Common Stock, commencing
October 23, 2000 through February 5, 2001, was quoted on the NASDAQ SmallCap
Market. Prior to the NASDAQ SmallCap listing, the Common Stock was quoted on the
OTC Electronic Bulletin Board.

The following table sets forth the range of high and low bid prices for the
Common Stock as reported on the relevant NASDAQ National Market System, the
NASDAQ SmallCap Market and the OTC Electronic Bulletin Board by the National
Association of Securities Dealers, Inc., Automated Quotations System for the
periods indicated.


15


Common Stock
Quarter Ended High Low
2002
December 31 $.29 $.12
September 30 $.57 $.10
June 30 $1.32 $.22
March 31 $1.84 $.81

2001
December 31 $2.29 $1.22
September 30 $6.24 $0.69
June 30 $6.33 $4.60
March 31 $6.88 $4.75

The foregoing represent inter-dealer prices, without retail mark-up,
mark-down or commission, and may not necessarily represent actual transactions.

As of March 31, 2003, there were approximately 128 record holders of the
Common Stock of the Company. The Company believes that there are a significant
number of shares of Common Stock held either in nominee name or street name
brokerage accounts and consequently, the Company is unable to determine the
number of beneficial owners of the Common Stock.

The Company has paid no dividends on its Common Stock and does not expect
to pay cash dividends in the foreseeable future. It is the present policy of the
Board to retain all earnings to provide funds for the growth of the Company. The
declaration and payment of dividends in the future will be determined by the
Board based upon the Company's earnings, financial condition, capital
requirements and such other factors as the Board may deem relevant. The Company
is not under any contractual restriction as to its present or future ability to
pay dividends.

RECENT SALES OF UNREGISTERED SECURITIES DURING 2002

Set forth below is a listing of all sales by the Company of unregistered
equity securities during 2002, excluding sales that were previously reported on
a Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. Unless otherwise indicated, such sales were
exempt from registration under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the
"Act"), pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Act, as they were transactions not
involving a public offering.

In November 2002, the Company issued 300,000 shares of the Company's Common
Stock in exchange for (and the cancellation of) warrants to purchase 350,000
shares of the Company's Common Stock originally issued to a financial consultant
in June 2000 that entitled the holder thereof, upon the consummation, if any, of
the sale of the Copy Protection Business, to acquire, pursuant to the cash-less
exercise provisions contained therein, additional shares of Common Stock equal
to approximately one third of the then Company's issued and outstanding Common
Stock.

ITEM 6. SELECTED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA.

The following table sets forth our consolidated financial data for the five
years ended December 31, 2002. The selected consolidated financial data for the
years ended December 31, 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001 and 2002 are derived from the
Company's consolidated financial statements for such years, which have been
audited by Brightman Almagor & Co., a member of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu,
independent auditors. The consolidated financial data set forth below should be
read in conjunction with the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements and
related Notes and "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations" included elsewhere in this report.

16




From inception
Year Ended December 31, (July 14,1994)
to December
Income Statement Data: 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 31, 2002

Revenues $54,922 $68,803 $1,999 $-- $-- $125,724
Total expenses $5,178,872 $7,944,252 $5,107,978 $5,153,724 $4,107,986 $32,793,688
Operating loss ($5,123,950) ($7,875,449) ($5,105,979) ($5,153,724) ($4,107,986) ($32,667,964)
Net loss ($5,578,540) ($13,072,237) ($4,796,693) ($5,498,637) ($5,244,751) ($40,370,429)

Net loss per share ($1.54) ($2.07) ($0.30) ($0.31) ($0.29)
Weighted average shares
Outstanding 3,615,908 6,321,719 16,006,403 17,560,013 17,827,893


Year Ended December 31,
1998 1999 2000 2001 2002
Balance Sheet Data:

Working capital
(deficiency) ($2,834,448) ($494,744) $8,122,456 $4,495,617 $193,308
Total assets $490,545 $467,867 $10,348,713 $6,550,947 $814,944
Total liabilities $3,588,712 $798,863 $351,756 $1,134,730 $558,909
Total stockholders'
equity (deficit) ($3,098,167) ($330,996) $9,996,957 $5,416,217 $256,035



ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS
OF OPERATION.

OVERVIEW

From its inception in 1994 through the period immediately preceding the
date on which the Purchase Agreement relating to the sale of the Company's Copy
Protection Business was entered into, TTR was primarily engaged in the business
of designing and developing digital security technologies that provide copy
protection for electronic content distributed on optical media and the internet.
In November 2002, the Company entered into the Purchase Agreement with the
Purchaser pursuant to which the Company agreed to sell to the Purchaser all of
the assets that were utilized in operating the Copy Protection Business. As of
the filing of this report, the sale has not been consummated as contemplated
because certain contingencies to the closing relating to the Consent of the OCS
have not been satisfied.

In order to facilitate the closing, an application has been filed with the
OCS to approve the transfer to an Israeli affiliate of Macrovision of certain
designated assets under the Purchase Agreement. As of the date of the filing of
this report, the response of the OCS has not been obtained. Certain rights to
terminate the Purchase Agreement arise if the transactions contemplated by that
agreement have not been consummated by March 15, 2003. Consequently, neither the
Company nor the Purchaser is contractually bound to close the transaction
contemplated by the Purchase Agreement. No assurance can be provided that the
OCS will in fact agree to the transfer of the Subject Technologies to
Macrovision Israel or that the sale of the Company's Copy Protection Business as
contemplated under the Purchase Agreement will in fact be consummated or
otherwise be concluded.

The Company has not had any significant revenues to date. As of December
31, 2002, the Company had an accumulated deficit of approximately $40 million.
The Company's expenses related primarily to expenditures on research and
development, marketing, recruiting and retention of personnel, costs of raising
capital and operating expenses incurred while it was engaged in the Copy
Protection Business.

As of the date of the execution of the Purchase Agreement in November 2002,
the Company has ceased to be engaged in the copy protection area, the only field
of business that it has been actively engaged in since it commenced operations
in 1994.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES

The Company's consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes have
been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America. The preperation of these financial statements requires
the Company's management to make estimates, judgements and assumptions that
affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses. The
Company continually evaluates the accounting policies and estimates it uses to
prepare the consolidated financial statements. The Company bases its estimates
on historical experience and assumptions believed to be reasonable under current
facts and circumstances. Actual amounts and results could differ from these
estimates made by management.

The Company does not participate in, nor has it created, any off-balance
sheet special purpose entities or other off-balance sheet financing. In
addition, the Company does not enter into any derivative financial instruments
for speculative purposes and uses derivative financial instruments primarily for
managing its exposure to changes in interest rates.

17


REVENUE SOURCE

Until the execution of the Purchase Agreement in November 2002, the Company
expected, for the near-term, that its primary source of revenue, if any, would
be royalties payable to it under the Alliance Agreement and, upon completion and
commercialization of the PALLADIUMCD product line, license fees therefrom. If
sale of the Copy Protection Business is consummated as contemplated by the
Purchase Agreement, the Company will no longer be entitled to the 30% royalty
payable under the Alliance Agreement and it is unlikely there will be any
significant revenue source, other than the anticipated net proceeds payable at
the closing.

If the closing of the sale of the Copy Protection Business contemplated
under the Purchase Agreement is not consummated , management anticipates that,
unless it reaches an agreement with Macrovision as to the parties' rights
respecting the jointly developed technologies under the Alliance Agreement, it
may commence legal process against Macrovision in order to defend the Company's
interests and assert its rights under the Alliance Agreement, as well as to
resume the previously abandoned limited marketing efforts respecting the
PALLADIUMCD product line. Under such circumstances, no assurance can be provided
that any royalties payable under the Alliance Agreement will be collected or
that the Company will be able to generate any proceeds from the PALLADIUMCD
product line.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2002 COMPARED TO YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2001

There were no revenues in 2002 or 2001.

Research and development costs in 2002 were $701,629 compared to $949,766
in 2001, which included the costs incurred in the development of SAFEAUDIO. The
decrease is primarily attributable to the Company's decision in October 2002 to
terminate all research and development activities at TTR Ltd. due to the
anticipated sale of the intellectual property related to its Copy Protection
Business. Research and development costs in 2002 and 2001 related primarily to
the enhancement of SAFEAUDIO features undertaken by both TTR and Macrovision,
the development and expansion of copy protection technology to CD-Rs and digital
rights management. Commencing June 2001 and continuing through May 2002, the
Company agreed to pay to Macrovision, on a monthly basis, $20,000 to partially
cover unanticipated expenses incurred in the development of SAFEAUDIO.

Sales and marketing expenses in 2002 were $159,486 as compared to $399,523
in 2001. The decrease is primarily due to Macrovision's assumption of a
significant portion of the sales and marketing expenses for SAFEAUDIO, as
provided for in the Alliance Agreement, and the Company's decision to terminate
all sales and marketing expenses in November 2002 based on the anticipated sale
of the Copy Protection Business.

General and administrative expenses in 2002 were $3,050,620 as compared to
$2,894,616 in 2001. The 2002 expenses, compared to those in 2001, include an
increase in officers' compensation costs and related benefits as a result of the
restructuring of senior management of the Company, professional fees incurred in
connection with the negotiation and execution of the Purchase Agreement, the
defense and prosecution of various litigation matters and, termination and
settlement costs associated with the TTR Ltd Wind-down, the Company's Israeli
subsidiary.

Stock-based compensation for the year ended 2002 was $35,251 as compared to
$909,819 for the year ended 2001. The decrease in stock-based compensation
expense is attributable to a reduction in remaining deferred compensation that
was incurred in previous

18


years. In addition, during 2002 the Company did not issue any significant stock
options that would have required the Company to recognize additional significant
deferred compensation.

During 2002, the Company recorded bad debt expense of $161,000 in
connection with the non-payment of a note receivable upon its maturity in July
2002 and certain uncollectable employee advances. Although management believes
collection of the full amount due under the promissory note is doubtful, it
intends to pursue recovery.

The Company's affiliate, ComSign Ltd., commenced operations in July 2000.
ComSign serves as VeriSign Inc.'s sole principal affiliate in Israel and the
Palestinian Authority and exclusive marketer of VeriSign's digital
authentication certificates and related services. Based on management's view
that the value of the investment has been impaired, the Company wrote-off,
during the year ended 2002, the amount of $748,690, representing the remaining
goodwill and the balance of its investment. The Company has no further
obligation or intention to fund any continuing losses incurred by ComSign Ltd.

Interest income for the year ended 2002 was $37,808 compared to $276,179
for the year ended 2001. The decrease is attributable to the lower cash and cash
equivalent balances, primarily resulting from the expenditure of cash to finance
Company operations and management restructuring as well as lower interest rates
on invested balances.

The Company reported a net loss for the year-ended 2002 of $(5,244,751) or
$(.29) per share on a basic and diluted basis as compared to a net loss of
$(5,498,637) or $(.31) per share on a basic and diluted basis, for the year
ended 2001.

YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2001 COMPARED TO YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2000

There were no revenues in 2001. Nominal revenues in 2000 were derived from
licensing fees of the Company's DiscGuard product, which has since been
discontinued.

Research and development costs in 2001 were $949,766 as compared to
$1,111,889 in 2000. The 2000 period included the costs incurred in the
development of SAFEAUDIO. Research and development costs in 2001 included the
enhancement of SAFEAUDIO, developing and expanding DVD anti-copying protection
and designing an effective anti-copying solution for application to files
downloaded from the Internet. Commencing June 2001 and continuing through May
2002, the Company agreed to pay to Macrovision, on a monthly basis, $20,000 to
partially cover unanticipated expenses incurred in the development of SAFEAUDIO.

Sales and marketing expenses in 2001 were $399,523 as compared to $579,006
in 2000. The decrease is primarily due to Macrovision's assumption (since 2000)
of most of the sales and marketing expenses for SAFEAUDIO, as provided for in
the Alliance Agreement. The 2000 period includes approximately $132,800 of
reimbursements to Macrovision of certain sales and marketing expenses as
required under the agreement.

General and administrative expenses in 2001 were $2,894,616 as compared to
$1,785,434 in 2000. The increase is primarily attributable to the adjustment of
senior management salaries, the hiring in June 2001 of a former Chief Financial
Officer and former Executive Vice President for Business Development, increased
filing fees associated with the commencement of the Company's NASDAQ listing and
increased expenditures in connection with public relations. Additionally, under
the employment agreement entered into by the Company and its former Chief
Operating Officer, the Company was obligated to pay the annual salary of such
former officer through September 2003. As of October 2001, such officer was no
longer employed by the Company. Accordingly, the Company accrued and charged
during 2001 approximately $437,000, representing the aggregate salary payments
through September 2003 to such former officer.

19


Stock-based compensation for the year ended 2001 was $909,819 as compared
to $1,631,649 for the year ended 2000. The 2000 period includes approximately
$656,000 from stock options granted to the Company's former CEO and former Chief
Technology Officer with exercise prices below the fair value of the underlying
common stock. At December 31, 2001, the Company had deferred compensation of
approximately $39,000, of which $31,000 was amortized in the first quarter of
2002.

The Company's affiliate, ComSign Ltd., commenced operations in July 2000.
ComSign serves as VeriSign Inc.'s sole principal affiliate in Israel and the
Palestinian Authority and exclusive marketer of VeriSign's digital
authentication certificates and related services. The Company's share of net
losses for the year ended 2001 and for the seven-month period ended December 31,
2000 was, respectively, $618,090 and $209,157. The losses are primarily
attributable to the amortization of intangible assets.

Interest income for the year ended 2001 was $276,179 as compared to
$524,253 for the year ended 2000. The decrease is attributable to the lower cash
and cash equivalent balances, primarily resulting from the expenditure of cash
to finance Company operations as well as lower interest rates on invested
balances.

The Company reported a net loss for the year ended 2001 of $(5,948,637) or
$(0.31) per share on a basic and diluted basis, as compared to a net loss of
$(4,796,693) or $(0.30) per share on a basic and diluted basis, for the year
ended 2000.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

At December 31, 2002, the Company had cash and cash equivalents of
$653,885, representing a decrease of approximately $4.3 million over December
31, 2001.

Cash used by operating activities during 2002 was $4.1 million compared to
$3.1 million during 2001. Cash used in 2002 was primarily attributable to
on-going company operations through November 2002, payments associated with the
Wind-down of TTR Ltd., the Israeli based subsidiary, and payments made in
connection with the restructure of the Company's management. Additionally, in
2002, the Company used $180,000 in investing activities of which $112,000 was
used for the purchase of property and equipment.

The Company has no long-term debt or any material debt commitments.

If the sale of the Company's Copy Protection Business is consummated as
contemplated under the Purchase Agreement, the net proceeds thereof are expected
to result in an increase in cash of approximately $5 million. No assurance
however, can be provided that the sale of the business will in fact be
consummated.

If the sale of the Copy Protection Business is not consummated, management
believes that it will need to raise additional cash in an amount significantly
exceeding its 2002 year-end cash resources in order to defend its interests,
including its rights under the Alliance Agreement with Macrovision, and to
resume operations in the copy protection field. Due primarily to expenses
incurred in connection with the continuing defense of on-going lawsuits
described in item 3 of this report, management believes that the available cash
as of the filing of this report to be significantly less than amount reported
for year-end December 2002. The financial statements accompanying this report
for the year ended December 31, 2002, include an explanatory paragraph relating
to the uncertainty of the Company's ability to continue as a going concern,
which may make it more difficult for the Company to raise additional capital. At
the present time, the Company has no commitments for any such financing, and
there can be no assurance that additional capital will be available to the
Company on commercially acceptable terms. If the Company is unable to raise such
financing on commercially reasonable terms, it may no longer be able to remain
in business. Furthermore, it is

20


anticipated that any successful financing will have a significant dilutive
effect on existing stockholders. The inability to obtain such financing will
have a material adverse effect on the Company, its condition and prospects.

RECENTLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

In June 2002, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (the "FASB") issued
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 146, ("SFAS 146"), Accounting
for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities. SFAS 146 requires that a
liability for a cost associated with an exit or disposal activity be recognized
when the liability is incurred. SFAS 146 requires that the initial measurement
of a liability be at fair value. SFAS 146 will be effective for exit or disposal
activities that are initiated after December 31, 2002. The Company has adopted
SFAS 146 effective January 1, 2003 and does not expect that the adoption will
have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

In December 2002, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 148 ("SFAS 148"), "Accounting for Stock-Based
Compensation-Transition and Disclosure." This statement amends and supersedes
FASB Statement No. 123 "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation." The Company
has adopted the disclosure provisions of SFAS 148 as of December 31, 2002 and
has included the required disclosures in Note 2 and 9 to its consolidated
financial statements.

ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK.

INTEREST RATE RISK

To date, the Company has not utilized derivative financial instruments or
derivative commodity instruments. The Company invests its cash primarily in
money market funds and certificates of deposit, which are subject to minimal
credit and market risk. The Company has no long-term debt.

FOREIGN CURRENCY RISK

The Company is exposed to foreign exchange rate fluctuations as they relate
to operating expenses as the financial results of foreign subsidiaries are
translated into U.S. dollars in consolidation. Most of the Company cash balances
are held in dollar-based accounts. As exchange rates vary, these results, when
translated, may vary from expectations and adversely impact overall expected
profitability. The effect of foreign exchange rate fluctuations on the Company
in 2002 was not material.

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATE.

The information called for by this Item 8 is included following the "Index
to Financial Statements" contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND
FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE.

None

PART III

ITEM 10. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT.

DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS

The Company's directors, officers and key employees are as follows:

21


Name Age Position
- ---- --- --------
Daniel C. Stein 33 CEO, President, Treasurer and Director

Sam Brill 29 Chief Operating Officer, Director

Richard Gottehrer 62 Director

Michael Paolucci 33 Director

Joel Schoenfeld 52 Director

Neil Subin 38 Director

DANIEL C. STEIN, has been the Chief Executive Officer of the Company since
May 6, 2002, a director since August 26, 2002 and President since November 2002.
From December 2001 through the time immediately prior to his appointment as
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, he worked as a private consultant
specializing in the acquisition and management of companies in the media and
technology industry. From December 2000 through December 2001, he worked as
President of Javu Technologies, Inc., a private company engaged in the licensing
of software and services to corporations that store, manage, deliver or
repurpose video assets. From March 1999 through November 2000, Mr. Stein was
President and Chief Operating Officer of The Wedding List Company, an internet
bridal registry company with retail outlets specializing in the wedding gift and
registry business (http://www.theweddinglist.com). The Wedding List was sold in
2001 to Martha Stewart/Omni Media. In 1993, Mr. Stein co-founded Burly Bear
Network, a Company providing cable programming and online services to college
students (http://www.burlybear.com). From July 1993 through March 1999, he was
the director and Chief Executive Officer of Burly Bear. Burly Bear served
approximately eight million households and was sold in 1997 to Lorne Michaels,
the owner of Broadway Video and creator and producer of the television show
Saturday Night Live. Mr. Stein received a BS in Finance in 1992 from Cornell
University.

SAM BRILL has been a director of the Company since February 2002 and the
Chief Operating Officer since April 15, 2002. From November 2001 to immediately
prior to his appointment as Chief Operating Officer, he served as the Company's
Vice-President, Corporate Strategy. Prior to joining the Company, from February
1998 through November 2001 Mr. Brill was employed by JDS Capital Management,
Inc., a New York based hedge fund and an affiliate of the Company's largest
stockholder, where he worked as a Senior Financial Analyst evaluating for market
viability and investment potential a diverse group of public and private
companies. Mr. Brill received a BS in Finance, cum laude, in January 1998 from
Touro College.

RICHARD GOTTEHRER co-founded in June 1998 The Orchard, a leading
distributor of independent music in America. The Orchard spun off a digital
media company, OWIE, Inc. (Orchard Wireless & Interactive Entertainment), of
which Mr. Gottehrer is currently Chief Executive Officer. OWIE is a one-stop
digital media company that acquires, provisions and delivers content to
authorized online music services. Prior to his association with The Orchard, Mr.
Gottehrer worked as an independent producer, providing services primarily to
major recording companies. Mr. Gottehrer co-founded in 1968 and presided over
through 1976, Sire Records, Inc., a private recording company whose roster of
artists included Madonna, Depeche Mode, the Pretenders, Talking Heads and
Ramones. Sire was ultimately acquired by Time Warner Company. Mr. Gottherer
possesses a wide range of experience and broad overview of the music industry
and has been a successful songwriter, producer and music industry executive. His
songwriting career included the classics "My Boyfriend's Back", "I want Candy",
"Sorrow" and "Nightime" and his creations have been recorded by,

22


among others, such artists as David Bowie, George Thorogood, Aaron Carter and
Jerry Lee Lewis. Mr. Gottehrer is also responsible for the production of
classics such as "Hang on Sloopy" and the recording of the artists Blondie, Joan
Armatrading and the Go Go's.

MICHAEL PAOLUCCI has since January 2001 been the President of Telescope
Society, Inc., a private company specializing in connecting telescopes to the
internet for amateur astronomers. Prior to his association with the Telescope
Society, from January 1999 through December 2000, Mr. Paolucci was engaged in
the start-up of video related internet companies, including Javu Technologies,
Inc., a private company engaged in the licensing of software and services to
corporations that store, manage, deliver or repurpose video assets of which the
Company's Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Daniel C. Stein, served as President from
December 2000 through December 2001. From January 1998 through December 1998,
Mr. Paolucci served as a director of 24/7 Media, an internet advertising agency
that was formed by the merger of Interactive Imaginations, one of the first
Internet-based advertising sites that Mr. Paolucci founded in June 1993 and two
other Internet based advertising organizations, and whose stock became quoted on
the Nasdaq National Market in August 1998. From the time of the founding of
Interactive Imaginations in June 1993 through December 1997, Mr. Paolucci served
as its Chief Executive Officer and Director and in 1998 as Director. Within
Interactive Imaginations, Mr. Paolucci created ContentZone, the first Internet -
based advertising network.

JOEL SCHOENFELD has been a private consultant engaged in the field of
business applications and international policy issues primarily impacting
e-commerce since April 2000. His clients include the United States Copyright
Office, Full Audio, BMG Music, MusicMatch, Touchtunes, Hed Arzi, Orange Wireless
(Israel) and Comverse. From October 1989 through March 2000, Mr. Schoenfeld
served as General Counsel and Senior Vice President of BMG Entertainment, the
entertainment division of Bertelsmann AG, with responsibility for all legal and
business affairs of BMG worldwide. At Bertelsman, Mr. Schoenfeld's duties
included negotiating and analyzing new and existing business ventures and
territorial expansion on a global level, international intellectual policy
issues, international antitrust and competition matters and privacy and database
protection compliance. Since 1989, Mr. Schoenfeld served as an officer or
director or both for more than eighty Bertelsmann-related companies in more than
thirty-five countries. Since 1998 he has served as a commissioner on the
Industry Advisory Commission to the World Intellectual Property Organization. He
has also served in various positions with IFPI, a private non-profit
organization representing the interest of the recording industry worldwide. He
was elected to IFPI's Board of Directors in 1991 and continued to serve until
his resignation in 2001. Since January 1999, he has served as chairman of the
IFPI Council.

NEIL SUBIN founded and has been the Managing Director and President of
Trendex Capital Management, a private hedge fund, since December 1991. Mr. Subin
currently is a member of the Board of Directors of Dynacore Holdings, a
developer of e-commerce and other Internet-related products, First Avenue
Networks, Inc. (formerly Advanced Radio Telecom Corp.), a wireless
communications company, Nucentrix Broadband Networks, Inc, a wireless
communications company and Komag Inc., a manufacturer of thin-film disks for use
in computer disk drives. Mr. Subin has been actively involved in the formation
of, and has served on, official and ad hoc committees of debt and equity
security holders in restructuring of companies including The Lionel Corporation,
The Zale Corporation, R.H. Macy & Co., Interco, Inc., Hillsborough Holdings
Corp./Jim Walter Corp., Morrison Knudsen Corp., Flagstar Cos., Anacomp, Inc.,
UDC Homes Inc., Trans World Airlines Inc., Buenos Aires Embotteladora S.A.,
Golden Books Family Entertainment, Inc., Boston Chicken, Inc., Iridium LLC,
Metricom, Inc. and The Federal Mogul Corporation.

All directors hold office until the next annual meeting of stockholders and
the election and qualification of their successors.

SECTION 16(A) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE

23


Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act, requires officers and directors of the
Company and persons who own more than ten percent of the Common Stock, to file
initial statements of beneficial ownership (Form 3), and statements of changes
in beneficial ownership (Forms 4 or 5), of Common Stock with the SEC. Officers,
directors and greater than 10% stockholders are required by SEC regulation to
furnish the Company with copies of all such forms they file.

Based solely on review of the copies of such forms received by the Company
with respect to 2002, the Company believes that all of the filing obligations of
officers, directors and 10% stockholders under Section 16(a) during 2002 have
been complied with, except that Dr. Sollish did not file a Form 4 with respect
to certain grants of options under the Company's 2002 Equity Incentive Plan.

ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION.

The following table sets forth all compensation earned by the Company's
Chief Executive Officer and President and the other executive officers of the
Company whose total annual salaries and bonuses exceeded $100,000 for the year
ended December 31, 2002 (the "Named Executive Officers"):



Annual Compensation Long-Term Compensation
------------------------------------------- ------------------------
Securities
Name and Other Annual Underlying All Other
Principal Position Year Salary($) Bonus($) Compensation($)(1) Options (#)(2) Compensation ($)
- ------------------ ---- --------- -------- ------------------ -------------- ----------------

Daniel C. Stein 2002 159,414 -- -- 550,000 34,224(4)
CEO and President (3) 2001 -- -- -- -- --
2000 -- -- -- -- --

Sam Brill 2002 157,226 -- -- -- --
Chief Operating 2001 14,423 -- -- 250,000 --
Officer (5) 2000 -- -- -- -- --


Marc D. Tokayer 2002 174,527 -- 63,543 -- 126,986(7)
Former CEO and 2001 250,922 -- 71,181 -- --
President (6) 2000 194,307 -- 42,968 970,700 --


Baruch Sollish 2002 159,537 -- 51,711 90,000 204,250(9)
Former Vice-President- 2001 213,000 -- 51,366 -- --
Research & 2000 158,324 75,092 28,608 382,050 --
Development (8)

Matthew L. Cohen 2002 76,154 -- -- -- 95,000 (11)
Former Chief Financial 2001 105,000 -- -- 100,000 (12) --
Officer (10) 2000 -- -- -- -- --


(1) Includes, for each of Marc D. Tokayer and Dr. Baruch Sollish, the Company's
former Chief Executive Officer and former Vice President of Research and
Development, respectively, primarily, some or all of the following: (i) Company
contributions to insurance (ii) taxable automobile related benefits and (iii)
tax-gross-ups for certain benefits.

(2) Represents shares of Common Stock issuable upon exercise of employee stock
options issued in the year indicated under the Company's 1996 Stock Option Plan
and 2000 Equity Incentive Plan.

(3) Daniel C. Stein commenced employment with the Company on May 6, 2002 as
Chief Executive Officer.

(4) Represents a three-year loan in the principal amount of $100,000 made by the
Company to

24


Mr. Stein in May 2002 in connection with his employment, with interest accruing
at the rate of 4% per annum. The Company agreed that, at the end of each
calendar year beginning December 31, 2002, it will forgive one-third of the loan
(and the related accrued interest thereon) as additional compensation, except
under certain conditions where the officer resigns or his employment is
terminated for cause.

(5) Sam Brill commenced employment with the Company on November 5, 2001 as Vice
President, Corporate Strategy. On April 15, 2002, he was appointed as the
Company's Chief Operating officer.

(6) Mr. Tokayer resigned from the position of Chief Executive Officer on May 6,
2002 and, on September 10, 2002 from all other positions held with the Company
and TTR Ltd. Pursuant to a consulting agreement entered into with the Company in
September 2002, Mr. Tokayer provided consulting services to the Company through
December 31, 2002.

(7) Comprised of (i) $83,000 under the consulting agreement entered into by Mr.
Tokayer and the Company in September 2002 and (ii) approximately $43,986 in
respect of accrued vacation pay.

(8) Dr. Sollish resigned from the Company's employment on October 1, 2002.
Pursuant to a consulting agreement entered into with the Company in October
2002, Dr. Sollish provided consulting services to the Company through December
31, 2002.

(9) Represents amounts paid to Dr. Sollish in connection with various consulting
agreements entered into by him and the Company in October 2002.

(10) Matthew L. Cohen commenced employment with the Company in June 2001. Mr.
Cohen's employment with the Company ended as of July 5, 2002.

(11) Represents lump sum amount paid to Mr. Cohen in July 2002 connection with
his resignation from the Company's employment.

(12) Represents shares of the Company's Common Stock issuable upon exercise of
options issued under the Company's 2000 Equity Incentive Plan, which options
have, as of December 31, 2002, been forfeited under the terms of such plan and
the option agreement.

OPTION GRANTS IN 2002

The following table sets forth certain information concerning the
individual option grants during the year ended December 31, 2002, to each of the
Named Executive Officers.




Number of % of Total
Securities Options Potential Realizable
Underlying Granted to Exercise Value at Assumed Annual
Options Employees Price Expiration Rates of Stock Price for
Name Granted (#) in 2002 ($/sh) date Option Term (1)
---- ----------- ------- ------ ---- ---------------
5% 10%

Daniel C. Stein(2) 550,000 (2) 79.14% 1.06 2012 $366,646 $929,152

Baruch Sollish (3) 40,000 (4) 5.76% 1.68 2012 $42,262 $107,099

Baruch Sollish (3) 50,000 (5) 7.19% 0.16 2012 $5,031 $12,750


(1) Potential realizable values are based on the fair market value per share on
the date of the grant and represent hypothetical gains that could be achieved
for the respective options if

25


exercised at the end of the option term. The dollar amounts set forth in these
columns are the result of calculations at the five percent and ten percent rates
set by the SEC, and are not intended to forecast possible future appreciation,
if any, of the Common Stock There can be no assurance that such potential
realizable values will not be more or less than that indicated in the table
above.

(2) Represents shares of Common Stock issuable upon exercise of options issued
in May 2002 under the Company's 2000 Equity Incentive Plan, of which options for
one-third of the shares vests in May 2003 and the remainder vest in eight
subsequent equal quarterly installments, PROVIDED, THAT, upon (and subject to)
the closing, if any, of the sale of the Company's Copy Protection Business as
contemplated under the Purchase Agreement, then the options vest and become
exercisable in their entirety.

(3) Dr. Sollish resigned from the Company's employment in October 2002.

(4) Represents shares of Common Stock issuable upon exercise of options issued
in January 2002 under the Company's 2000 Equity Incentive Plan and originally
intended to vest over 3 years. Upon the resignation of Dr. Sollish in October
2002, these options became vested in their entirety.

(5) Represents shares of Common Stock issuable upon exercise of options issued
in October 2002 under the Company's 2000 Equity Incentive Plan in connection
with the consulting agreement then entered into by the Company and Dr. Sollish.
The options are scheduled to vest in October 2003.

AGGREGATE OPTIONS EXERCISED IN 2002 AND 2002 YEAR END OPTION VALUES




Number of Securities Value of Unexercised
Underlying Unexercised In-the-Money Options
Shares Value Options at Fiscal Year At Fiscal Year End ($)
Acquired on Realized End (#) Exercisable/
Name Exercise (#) ($) Exercisable/Unexercisable Unexercisable (1)
- ---- ------------- --- ------------------------- -----------------

Daniel C. Stein -- -- 0/550,000 0/0

Sam Brill(2) -- -- 90,000/160,000 0/0

Marc D. Tokayer -- -- 970,700/0 0/0

Baruch Sollish -- -- 502,050/50,000 10,200/1,000


(1) Based upon the difference between the exercise price of such options and the
closing price of the Common Stock ($0.18) on December 31, 2002, as reported on
the NASDAQ National Market. As of January 8, 2003, the Company's Common Stock
was no longer quoted on the NASDAQ National Market and began to be quoted on the
OTC Bulletin Board.

(2) In connection with his employment by the Company in November 2001, initially
as its Vice President for Corporate Strategy, Mr. Brill was granted 250,000
options under the Company's 2000 Equity Incentive Plan, of which options for
90,000 shares vested on January 1, 2003 and 40,000 options vest every 7 months
thereafter through May 26, 2005 PROVIDED, THAT, upon (and subject to) the
closing, if any, of the sale of the Company's Copy Protection Business as
contemplated under the Purchase Agreement, then the options vest and become
exercisable in their entirety.

EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENTS

26


On May 2, 2002, the Company entered into a three-year employment agreement
with Daniel C. Stein as Chief Executive Officer. The agreement provides for an
annual base salary of $240,000 with increases of 10% per annum provided that the
previous year's gross revenues are greater than the base salary. If Mr. Stein is
terminated other than for cause (as defined in the employment agreement) or if
Mr. Stein terminates his employment for good reason (as defined in the
employment agreement), he will be entitled to receive the equivalent of base
salary and benefits through the remaining term of his agreement. Additionally,
upon (and subject to) the consummation of the sale of the Copy Protection
Business, then all oustanding stock options will vest and become exercisable.

In connection with Sam Brill's promotion in April 2002 to Chief Operating
Officer (from Vice President, Corporate Strategy), on May 27, 2002 the Company
and Mr. Brill entered into an amended and restated three-year employment
agreement which provides for an annual base salary of $170,000 with increases of
10% per annum. If Mr. Brill is terminated other than for cause (as defined in
the employment agreement) or if Mr. Brill terminates his employment for good
reason (as defined in the employment agreement), he will be entitled to receive
the equivalent of base salary and benefits through the remaining term of his
agreement. Additionally, upon (and subject to) the consummation of the sale of
the Copy Protection Business, then all outstanding stock options will vest and
become exercisable.

In May 2002, the Company and its Israeli subsidiary and Marc Tokayer
amended and restated Mr. Tokayer's employment agreement originally entered into
in August 1994 (and subsequently amended). Under the amended and restated
agreement, Mr. Tokayer served as President of the Company and General Manager of
the Company's Israeli subsidiary for a term ending in May 2007, which term was
renewable for additional one-year terms, unless either party elects on not less
than 60 days' prior notice to not renew the agreement. Mr. Tokayer was entitled
under the amended and restated agreement to an annual base salary of $250,000,
subject to increase upon review. If Mr. Tokayer is terminated other than for
cause (as defined in the employment agreement) or if Mr. Tokayer terminates his
employment for good reason (as defined in the employment agreement), he is
entitled to receive the equivalent of four years of salary then in effect. If
the agreement is not renewed upon scheduled expiration, Mr. Tokayer is entitled
to receive the equivalent of two years of salary then in effect. Mr. Tokayer
resigned from the position of Chief Executive Officer in May 2002 and, in
September 2002, from all other positions held with the Company and TTR Ltd.

The Company's Israeli subsidiary and Dr. Baruch Sollish signed an
employment agreement in December 1994 which was amended in July 1998 and in
February 2001, pursuant to which, Dr. Sollish served as Director of Product
Research and Development of the Israeli subsidiary. By its terms, the agreement
was renewable for terms of three years, subject to termination by either party
on not less than 60 days notice prior to the end of any term. The current term
expires on December 1, 2003. Dr. Sollish was entitled to an annual base salary
of $213,000 subject to increase and the grant of a performance bonus in the
board's discretion. If Dr. Sollish is terminated other than for engaging in
willful misconduct or acts of bad faith or conviction of a felony or in the
event of a change in control of the Company (as defined in the employment
agreement) and Dr. Sollish does not continue to be employed in a substantially
similar position, Dr. Sollish will be entitled to receive the greater of the
balance of the salary then due under the agreement through the scheduled
expiration date or the equivalent of 12 months' salary. Dr. Sollish resigned
from the Company's employment in October 2002.

The Company and Matthew L. Cohen entered into an employment agreement in
June 2001, pursuant to which Mr. Cohen was employed as the Company's Chief
Financial Officer. The initial term of the employment agreement was for two
years and, at the end of such initial term, the employment thereunder was
automatically renewable for an additional one year unless either party gives
notice of termination at least 60 days prior to the scheduled expiration date.
Mr. Cohen was entitled to an annual salary of $180,000, subject to increase and
the grant of a performance bonus in the Board's discretion. If Mr. Cohen is
terminated other than for engaging in willful misconduct or acts of bad faith or
conviction of a felony or, if there is a change in control of the Company (as
defined in the employment agreement) and Mr. Cohen does not continue as Chief
Financial Officer on terms and conditions substantially

27


similar to those contained in his agreement, he will be entitled to receive six
months' salary then due under the agreement. Mr. Cohen's employment with the
Company ended as of July 5, 2002.

Each of the executives with an agreement has agreed to certain customary
confidentiality and non-compete provisions that prohibit him from competing with
the Company for one year, or soliciting the Company's employees for one year,
following the termination of his employment.

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE INTERLOCKS AND INSIDER PARTICIPATION

The Compensation/Stock Option Committee was established in October 2000 and
is responsible for reviewing the compensation arrangements in effect for the
Company's executive officers and for administering the Company's 2000 Incentive
Plan. This committee is not currently staffed and the entire Board, except for
employee-directors, addresses compensation matters. Mr. Daniel C. Stein, the
Company's Chief Executive Officer and President and Mr. Sam Brill, the Company's
Chief Operating Officer, serve on the Board. None of the non-employee members of
the Board was employed by the Company or any of its subsidiaries or had any
other relationship requiring disclosure by the Company under any paragraph of
Item 404 of Regulation S-K.

COMPENSATION OF NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTORS

Each of the non-employee directors receives an annual cash payment of
$5,000 for serving on the Board. None of the employee-directors receive any cash
compensation for serving on the Board.

In addition, each of the non-employee directors received in August 2002
under the Company's 2002 Non-Employee Directors Stock Option Plan options to
purchase 45,000 shares of the Company's Common Stock, to vest over two years
from the date of grant, at a per share price of $0.25. In addition, each
non-employee director also receives options under such plan to purchase an
additional 10,000 shares of Common Stock for service on any committee, to vest
over the course of two years from the date of grant, in each case at a per share
exercise price equal to the market price of the stock at the date of grant.

ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND
RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS.

(i) The following table sets forth certain information, as of March 31,
2003 (except as otherwise disclosed in the footnotes to the table), concerning
the ownership of the Common Stock by (a) each person who, to the Company's
knowledge, beneficially owned on that date more than 5% of the outstanding
Common Stock, (b) each of the Company's directors and Named Executive Officers
(as defined above under "Executive Compensation") and (c) all current directors
and executive officers of the Company as a group.



Number of Shares Percent of
Name of Beneficial Owner (1) Beneficially Owned (2) Common Stock (2)
- ------------------------------ ---------------------- ----------------

Daniel C. Stein, Chief Executive Officer
and Director - (3) *

Sam Brill, Chief Operating Officer
and Director 90,000 (4) *

Richard Gottehrer, Director - (5) *


28





Michael Paolucci, Director - (6) *

Joel Schoenfeld, Director - (6) *

Neil Subin, Director - (6) *

Marc D. Tokayer, former President, Chief
Executive Officer and Director 1,565,247 (7) 8.57%

Baruch Sollish, former Chief Technology
Officer 578,830 (8) 3.17%

Matthew L. Cohen, former Chief Financial
Officer -(9) *

Macrovision Corporation (10) 1,880,937 (11) 10.30%

Joseph D. Samberg 3,045,800 (12) 16.68%

Yokim Asset Management Corp. 1,625,468 (13) 8.90%

Seth Rosenblatt 1,346,854 (14) 7.38%

All directors and executive officers as
a group (6 persons) (15) 90,000 (15) *

* Indicates less than 1%.

(1) Unless otherwise indicated, the address of each person listed is c/o TTR
Technologies, Inc., 575 Lexington Avenue, New York, New York 10022.

(2) Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with the rules of the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC") and generally includes voting or
investment power with respect to securities. In accordance with SEC rules,
shares of Common Stock issuable upon the exercise of options or warrants which
are currently exercisable or which become exercisable within 60 days following
the date of the information in this table are deemed to be beneficially owned
by, and outstanding with respect to, the holder of such options or warrants.
Except as indicated by footnote, and subject to community property laws where
applicable, to the knowledge of the Company, each person listed is believed to
have sole voting and investment power with respect to all shares of Common Stock
owned by such person.

In addition, under the Purchase Agreement entered into by the Company and
Macrovision, among other parties, with respect to the sale of all of the assets
of the Company that relate in any material respect to its Copy Protection
Business, upon and subject to such closing, Macrovision has undertaken to return
to the Company, for eventual cancellation and return to the Company's treasury,
the 1,880,937 shares of the Company's Common Stock that Macrovision purchased in
January 2000 in connection with its then equity investment in the Company. As of
the date of the filing of this report, the Company has 18,261,567 outstanding
shares of Common Stock. Following the return by Macrovision of the 1,880,937
shares of Common Stock held by it following closing, if any, of the sale of the
Company's Copy Protection Business as contemplated under the Purchase Agreement
and before giving effect to any subsequent issuance of Common Stock by the
Company (whether an original issuance or through an exercise of outstanding
warrants and options), the aggregate number of outstanding shares of the Company
Common Stock will be reduced to 16,380,630. Accordingly, based on the foregoing,
the holdings of each person reflected as a percentage of the aggregate
outstanding shares of Common Stock of the Company may need to be changed.

(3) Does not include options for 550,000 shares of Common Stock issuable upon
exercise of

29


options issued under the 2000 Equity Incentive Plan, of which options for
one-third of the shares are scheduled to vest and become first exercisable in
May 2003 and the remainder vest in eight subsequent equal quarterly
installments, PROVIDED, THAT, upon (and subject to) the closing, if any, of the
sale of the Company's Copy Protection Business as contemplated under the
Purchase Agreement, then the options vest and become exercisable in their
entirety.

(4) Represents currently exercisable options for 90,000 shares of Common Stock
issued upon exercise of options issued under the 2000 Equity Incentive Plan.
Does not include options for 160,000 shares of Common Stock scheduled to vest
over the succeeding two years; PROVIDED, THAT, upon (and subject to) the
closing, if any, of the sale of the Company's Copy Protection Business as
contemplated under the Purchase Agreement, then the options vest and become
exercisable in their entirety.

(5) Does not include options for 45,000 shares of Common Stock issuable upon
exercise of stock options issued under the Company's 2002 Non-Employee Directors
Stock Option Plan, of which options for 22,500 shares are scheduled to vest and
become first exercisable in August 2003 and options for the remaining 22,500
shares are scheduled to vest and become first exercisable in August 2004.

(6) Does not include options for 55,000 shares of Common Stock issuable upon the
exercise of stock options issued under the Company's 2002 Non-Employee Directors
Stock Option Plan, of which options for 27,500 shares are scheduled to vest and
become first exercisable in August 2003 and the options for the remaining 27,500
shares will vest and become first exercisable in August 2004.

(7) Comprised of (i) 270,273 shares of Common Stock, (ii) 970,700 shares of
Common Stock issuable upon the exercise of currently exercisable employee stock
options issued under the Company's 1996 Employee Stock Option Plan and 2000
Equity Incentive Plan and (iii) 324,274 shares of Common Stock held by The
Tokayer Family Trust (the "Trust"). Mr. Tokayer's wife is the trustee of the
Trust and Mr. Tokayer's children are its income beneficiaries. Mr. Tokayer
disclaims beneficial ownership of all shares held by the Trust.

(8) Comprised of (i) 502,050 shares of Common Stock issuable upon the exercise
of currently exercisable employee stock options issued under the Company's 1996
Employee Stock Option Plan and 2000 Equity Incentive Plan and (ii) 76,780 shares
of Common Stock. Does not include 50,000 shares of Common Stock issuable upon
the exercise of options issued under the Company's 2000 Equity Incentive Plan
and scheduled to vest in October 2003.

(9) Mr. Cohen's employment with the company ended as of July 5, 2002.

(10) The address of such person is 2830 De La Cruz Boulevard, Santa Clara,
California 95050. The foregoing is based on a Schedule 13D filed by the
stockholder in June 2000.

(11) Upon (and subject to) a closing, if any, of the sale of the Copy Protection
Business as contemplated under the Purchase Agreement, then under such agreement
Macrovision is to return these shares to the Company, for eventual cancellation
and return to the Company's treasury.

(12) Mr. Samberg is the managing member of JDS Capital Management, LLC, a
Delaware limited liability company ("JDSCM"). JDSCM is the general partner of
JDS Capital, LP ("JDS Capital"). These shares are held of record by JDS Capital.
As such, Mr. Samberg has shared voting and dispositive power over the shares of
Common Stock held by JDS Capital and each of Mr. Samberg and JDSCM may be deemed
a beneficial owner of those shares. The address of the principal business office
of JDSCM, JDS Capital and Mr. Samberg is 780 Third Avenue, 45th Floor, New York,
New York 10017. The foregoing disclosure is based on the Schedule 13D
(Amendment) filed by the stockholder on November 8, 2002 and a Form 4 filed on
November 13, 2002.

30


In order to allow open market purchases of Company stock by JDSCM and affiliated
entities, in July 2002 the Company's Board of Directors approved a resolution
providing that such entities would not, solely by virtue of such open market
transactions, be deemed to be subject to the restrictions imposed by Section 203
of the Delaware Corporation Law in connection with any subsequent transaction,
including a financing transaction, between the Company and these entities, so
long as following such open market purchases the aggregate holdings of all such
entities do not exceed 40% of the Company's outstanding Common Stock. Generally,
subject to certain exceptions and other provisions, Section 203 prohibits a
publicly-held Delaware corporation from engaging in a "business combination"
(generally, a merger, asset or stock sale, or another transaction of financial
benefit to an interested stockholder) with an "interested stockholder"
(generally, a person, who, together with affiliates and associates, owns (or
within three years prior did own) 15% or more of the corporation's voting stock)
for a period of three years after the date that the person became an interested
stockholder. Although the Company and JDSCM previously entered into a
non-binding agreement-in-principle pursuant to which JDSCM (or affiliated
entities) had agreed to provide financing to the Company, as reported in the
Company's Current Report on Form 8-K dated April 24, 2002, JDSCM subsequently
informed the Company that it did not intend to move forward on such transaction
at that time, as the Company reported in a Current Report on Form 8-K dated June
13, 2002. There currently are no plans or commitments for any such financing
transaction.

(13) Yokim Asset Management Corp ("Yokim") is a corporation organized under the
laws of the British Virgin Islands with a principal business office at Akara
Building, 24 De Castro Street, Wickhams Cay I, Road Town, Tortola, British
Virgin Islands. The foregoing disclosure is based on the schedule 13D filed by
the stockholder in January 2003, as amended in February 2003.

(14) Mr. Rosenblatt has sole voting and dispositive power over 57,100 shares of
Common Stock. Mr. Rosenblatt claims to have received unsolicited proxies to vote
1,289,754 shares of Common Stock from 22 of the Company's stockholders, with
such proxies as to an unspecified number of shares scheduled to expire on April
1, 2003. As such, Mr. Rosenblatt has shared voting and dispositive power over
the shares subject to the proxy may be deemed a beneficial owner of those
shares. The address of the principal business office of Mr. Rosenblatt is 455
Central Avenue, Cedarhurst, New York, 11516. The foregoing disclosure is based
on the Schedule 13D filed by the stockholder in February 2003.

(15) See Footnotes 3-6.

(ii) The following table sets forth certain required information relating
to the shares of Common Stock issuable on an aggregated basis under the
Company's 1996 Stock Option Plan, the 2000 Equity Incentive Plan, the 1998
Directors' Plan and the 2002 Non-Employee Directors' Stock Option Plan.



EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION



Plan Category Number of Weighted- Number of
securities to average securities
be issued exercise price of remaining
upon outstanding available for
exercise of options, future
outstanding warrants issuance.
options, and rights
warrants and
rights
(a) (b) (c)

Equity compensation plans approved by
security holders 3,106,875 $2.81 1,517,691

Equity compensation plans not approved
by security holders 600,000 $6.94 -
--------- ---------
Total 3,706,875 $3.48 1,517,691
========= =========


31


ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS.

In November 2002, the Company and Macrovision, one of the Company's largest
stockholders, entered into the Purchase Agreement pursuant to which the Company
agreed to sell to Macrovision, and certain of its affiliates, all of the
Company's assets that relate in any material respect to the Company's Copy
Protection Business. The Company's stockholders approved the sale of the Copy
Protection Business at a special meeting of the Company's stockholders held on
January 15, 2003. As of the date of the filing of this report, the sale of the
Copy Protection Business has not been consummated as contemplated under the
Purchase Agreement as the consent of the approval of the OCS to the transfer to
Macrovision of the Subject Technologies has not been obtained. An application
has been filed with the OCS with respect to the transfer of the Subject
Technologies from the Company to an Israeli affiliate of Macrovision. As of the
filing of this report, the response of the OCS has not been received. As the
sale of the Copy Protection Business was not consummated by March 15, 2003,
under the Purchase Agreement, neither the Company nor Macrovision is required to
consummate the transactions thereunder.

Since May 2002, the Company has retained the services of the law firm of
Budin & Partners, with which Steven Stein, Esq., the father of Mr. Daniel Stein,
the Company's Chief Executive Officer and President, was affiliated until March
2003. The Company paid to Budin & Partners during 2002 in the aggregate $70,305
in respect of services rendered. As of November 2002, the Company retained the
services of the law firm of ReedSmith LLP, to provide on-going legal services to
the Company and, in March 2003, Mr. Steven Stein agreed to serve as counsel to
ReedSmith LLP

The Company and Gershon Tokayer, its former Vice President, Marketing and
the brother of Marc D. Tokayer, the Company's former President, Chief Executive
Officer and a director and one of the larger stockholders of the Company,
entered into a consulting agreement in September 2002, following Mr. Gershon
Tokayer's resignation from the employment of the Company, pursuant to which Mr.
Tokayer was paid $82,000.

ITEM 14. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES.

The Company maintains disclosure controls and procedures that are designed
to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the Company's Exchange
Act reports is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time
periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission's rules and forms,
and that such information is accumulated and communicated to the Company's
management, including its Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial
Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required
disclosure. In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures,
management recognized that any controls and procedures, no matter how well
designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the
desired control objectives, and management necessarily was required to apply its
judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and
procedures.

Within the 90 days prior to the date of this report on Form 10-K, the
Company carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the
participation of the Company's Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial
Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company's
disclosure controls and procedures

32


(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14). Based upon that
evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer
concluded that the Company's disclosure controls and procedures are effective in
timely alerting them to material information relating to the Company (including
its consolidated subsidiary) required to be included in the Company's periodic
SEC filings. Subsequent to the date of that evaluation, there have been no
significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could
significantly affect internal controls.



PART IV

ITEM 15. EXHIBITS, REPORTS ON FORM 8-K AND FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
(a) Exhibits

3.1 Certificate of Incorporation of TTR dated July 14, 1994 and Certificate of Amendment to the Certificate of Incorporation of TTR
dated August 17, 1994(2)
3.2 Certificate of Amendment to the Certificate of Incorporation of TTR, dated January 30, 1999(3)
3.3 Certificate of Amendment to the Certificate of Incorporation of TTR, dated December 21, 1999(3)
3.4 Certificate of Amendment to the Certificate of Incorporation of TTR, dated July 15, 2000. (5)
3.4 By-Laws of TTR, as amended(2)
4.1 Specimen Common Stock Certificate(1)
4.2.3 Form of Class A Warrant between TTR and certain private investors(3)
4.2.4 Form of Agent Warrant between TTR and certain entities(3)
4.2.6 Warrant dated October 2, 2000 between TTR and Mantle International Investment Ltd(5)
4.2.7 Promissory Note made as of July 9, 2001 by Ripp Entertainment Group, Inc. in favor of TTR(6)
4.2.8 Promissory Note made as of May 2, 2002 by Daniel C. Stein in favor of TTR (9)
10.1 1996 Incentive and Non-Qualified Stock Option Plan, as amended (2)
10.2 Non-Executive Directors Stock Option Plan(2)
10.3 Employment Agreement between TTR Technologies Ltd. and Marc D. Tokayer (1)
10.4 Employment Agreement between TTR Technologies Ltd. and Baruch Sollish (1)
10.5 Alliance Agreement between TTR and Macrovision Corporation effective as of November 24, 1999(3)
10.6 Stock Purchase Agreement, effective as of January 10, 2000 between TTR and Macrovision Corporation (3)
10.7 Agreement between TTR and H.C. Wainwright & Co. Inc. dated February 8, 2000(3)
10.8 Form of Subscription Agreement dated February 18, 2000 between TTR and certain private investors and supplement thereto.(3)
10.9 Form of Registration Rights Agreement between TTR and certain private investors and supplement thereto(3)
10.10 Amendment to Employment Agreement between TTR and Baruch Sollish, dated July 22, 1998 (3)
10.11 Agreement between TTR and Comda (1985) Ltd. and ComSign Ltd. dated as of June 4, 2000(4)
10.12 Agreement between TTR and Bluestone Capital dated August 23 2000(4)
10.13 2000 Equity Incentive Plan(4)
10.14 Amendment to Employment Agreement between TTR and Marc Tokayer, dated February 1, 2001 +(5)
10.15 Amendment to Employment Agreement between TTR and Baruch Sollish, dated February 1, 2001 +(5)
10.16 Amendment No. 2, dated as of June 29, 2001, to the Alliance Agreement, dated as of November 24, 1999, between TTR and
Macrovision Corporation (6)
10.17 Agreement dated as of June 22, 2001 between TTR and Ripp Entertainment Group Inc. (6)
10.18 Pledge Agreement made July 9, 2001 by Ripp Entertainment Group Inc. in favor of TTR (6)
10.19 Employment Agreement between TTR and Matthew L. Cohen dated June 1 2001 +(6)
10.20 Employment Agreement between TTR and Sam Brill dated as of November 5, 2001 +(7)
10.21 Amended 2000 Equity Incentive Plan (7)
10.22 Amended Non-Executive Directors Stock Option Plan(7)
10.23 2002 Non-Employee Directors Stock Option Plan (8)
10.24 Employment Agreement between TTR and Daniel C. Stein dated as of May 2, 2002 +(9)
10.25 Amended and Restated Employment Agreement between TTR and Marc D. Tokayer dated as of May 6, 2002 +(9)
10.26 Amended and Restated Employment Agreement between TTR and Samuel Brill dated as of May 27, 2002 +(9)
10.27 Settlement Agreement between TTR and Emanuel Kronitz dated as of May 9, 2002 +(9)
10.28 Termination Agreement between TTR and Matthew L. Cohen dated as of April 17, 2002 +(9)
10.29 Amendment dated as of June 10, 2002 to Termination Agreement between TTR and Matthew L. Cohen dated as of April 17, 2002. +(9)


33




10.30 Termination and Settlement Agreement between TTR and Baruch Sollish as of October 1, 2002. +(11)
10.31 Consulting Agreement between TTR and Baruch Sollish as of October 9, 2002. +(10)
10.32 Letter Agreement among TTR and certain parties thereto dated as of October 17, 2002.(10)
10.33 Form of Security Exchange Agreement among TTR and certain parties thereto dated as of October 17, 2002.(10)
10.34 Asset Purchase Agreement among: TTR, TTR Technologies, Ltd. Macrovision Corporation and Macrovision Europe Ltd., dated as of
November 4, 2002. (11)
10.35 Termination and Settlement Agreement dated as of September 10, 2002 between TTR and Marc D. Tokayer +(12)
10.36 Termination and Settlement Agreement dated as of September 10, 2002 between TTR and Gershon Tokayer (12)
10.37 Consulting Agreement dated as of September 10, 2002 between TTR and Marc D. Tokayer +(12)
10.38 Consulting Agreement dated as of September 10, 2002 between TTR and Gershon Tokayer +(12)
21.1 Subsidiaries of TTR: TTR Technologies, Ltd., an Israeli corporation, wholly-owned by TTR.
23.1 Consent of Brightman Almagor & Co., a member of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu, certified public accountants. *
99.1 Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley act of 2002. *
99.2 Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. *


* Filed herewith.
+ Management Agreement.

(1) Filed as an Exhibit to the Registrant's Registration Statement on Form SB-2,
No. 333-11829, and incorporated herein by reference.

(2) Filed as an Exhibit to the Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-KSB filed
for the year ended December 31, 1998 and incorporated herein by reference.

(3) Filed as an Exhibit to TTR's Registration Statement on Form S-1, No.
33-32662 and incorporated herein by reference.

(4) Filed as an Exhibit to TTR's Report on Form 10-Q for the third quarter of
2000 and incorporated herein by reference.

(5) Filed as an Exhibit to TTR's Report on Form 10-K filed for the year ended
December 31, 2000 and incorporated herein by reference.

(6) Filed as an Exhibit to TTR's Report on Form 10-Q for the second quarter of
2001 and incorporated herein by reference.

(7) Filed as an Exhibit to TTR's Report on Form 10-K filed for the year ended
December 31, 2001 and incorporated herein by reference.

(8) Filed as an Exhibit to TTR's Revised Definitive Proxy Statement on Form
DEFRA 14-A for the 2002 Annual meeting of Stockholders, and incorpotrated herein
by reference.

(9) Filed as an Exhibit to TTR's Report on Form 10-Q for the second quarter of
2002 and incorporated herein by reference.

(10) Filed as an Exhibit to TTR's Report on Form 10-Q for the third quarter of
2002 and incorporated herein by reference.

(11) Filed as an Exhibit to the Registrant's Proxy Statement on Form 14-A, and
incorporated herein by reference.

(12) Filed as an Exhibit to TTR's special report on Form 8-K filed on September
10, 2002 and incorporated herein by reference.

34


(b) Reports on Form 8-K

(i) Report on Form 8-K, dated November 5, 2002

(ii) Report on Form 8-K, dated October 10, 2002

(iii) Report on Form 8-K, dated October 2, 2002

(iv) Report on Form 8-K, dated September 10, 2002

(v) Report on Form 8-K, dated September 9, 2002

(vi) Report on Form 8-K, dated June 27, 2002

(vii) Report on Form 8-K, dated June 13, 2002

(viii) Report on Form 8-K, dated April 24, 2002


35


SIGNATURES

In accordance with the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

TTR TECHNOLOGIES, INC.


BY: /s/ DANIEL C. STEIN
DANIEL C. STEIN,
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER,
PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER

Date: March 31, 2003

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this
Report has been signed below by the following person on behalf of the Company
and in the capacities so indicated.




Signature Title Date

/s/ Daniel C. Stein Chief Executive Officer,
Daniel C. Stein Principal Executive Officer March 31, 2003


/s/ Sam Brill Chief Operating Officer March 31, 2003
Sam Brill Principal Financial Officer


/s/ Richard Gottehrer Director March 31, 2003
Richard Gottehrer


/s/ Michael Paolucci Director March 31, 2003
Michael Paolucci


/s/ Joel Schoenfeld Director March 31, 2003
Joel Schoenfeld


/s/ Neil Subin Director March 31, 2003
Neil Subin



36


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-14 OR 15D-14 OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT
OF 1934, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Daniel C. Stein, Chief Executive Officer, of TTR Technologies, Inc., certify
that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of TTR Technologies, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the period presented in this annual report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I am responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiary,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this annual report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual
report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c) presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons fulfilling the equivalent function):

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which could adversely affect the Company's ability to record, process, summarize
and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any
material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have indicated in this annual
report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in
other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to
the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with
regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: March 31, 2003


/s/ DANIEL C. STEIN
DANIEL C. STEIN
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


37


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-14 OR 15D-14 OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT
OF 1934, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Sam Brill, Chief Operating Officer, of TTR Technologies, Inc., certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of TTR Technologies, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the period presented in this annual report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I am responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiary,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this annual report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual
report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c) presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
the registrant's board of directors (or persons fulfilling the equivalent
function):

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have indicated in this annual
report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in
other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to
the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with
regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: March 31, 2003

/s/ SAM BRILL
SAM BRILL
CHIEF OPERATING OFFICER
(PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER)


38


TTR TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS



Page

Report of Independent Auditors F-1

Consolidated Financial Statements

Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2002 and 2001 F-2

Statements of Operations for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2001
and 2000 and the period from July 14, 1994 (inception) to
December 31, 2002 F-3

Statements of Comprehensive Loss for the years ended December 31, 2002,
2001 and 2000 and the period from July 14, 1994 (inception) to
December 31, 2002 F-4

Statements of Stockholder's Equity (Deficiency) for the period from
July 14, 1994 (inception) to December 31, 2002 F-5

Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2001
and 2000 and the period from July 14, 1994 (inception) to
December 31, 2002 F-6

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements F-7


(i)



REPORT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

To the Shareholders of
TTR Technologies, Inc.

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of TTR
Technologies, Inc. ("the Company") (a development-stage company) and its
subsidiary at December 31, 2002 and 2001, and the related consolidated
statements of operations, comprehensive loss, stockholders' equity (deficit) and
cash flows for the three years ended December 31, 2002 and for the period from
December 5, 1994 (date of inception) to December 31, 2002. These consolidated
financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on
our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted
in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan and
perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial
statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a
test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial
statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and
significant estimates made by the Company's management, as well as evaluating
the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide
a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the aforementioned consolidated financial statements present
fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of the
Company and its subsidiary at December 31, 2002 and 2001, and the consolidated
results of their operations, comprehensive loss, stockholders' equity (deficit)
and their cash flows for the three years ended December 31, 2002 and for the
period from December 5, 1994 (date of inception) to December 31, 2002, in
conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America.

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that the
Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 1 to the
financial statements, the company's recurring losses from operations raise
substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. Management's
plans concerning these matters are also described in Note 1. The financial
statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of
this uncertainty.


Brightman Almagor & Co.
Certified Public Accountants (Israel)
A member of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu

Tel-Aviv, Israel
March 20, 2003

F-1




TTR TECHNOLOGIES INC. AND ITS SUBSIDIARY
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

December 31, December 31,
2002 2001
---- ----


ASSETS

Current assets
Cash and cash equivalents $ 653,885 $ 4,915,269
Note receivable, net of allowance for note loss - 130,000
Note receivable, officer 33,333 -
Prepaid expenses and other current assets 64,999 155,156
-------------- --------------

Total current assets 752,217 5,200,425

Property and equipment - net 23,093 201,453

Investment in ComSign, Ltd. - 1,145,519
Note receivable, officer 33,334 -
Other asset 6,300 3,550
-------------- --------------

Total assets $ 814,944 $ 6,550,947
============== ==============

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
LIABILITIES
Current liabilities
Accounts payable $ 497,898 $ 151,400
Accrued expenses 61,011 553,408
-------------- --------------

Total current liabilities 558,909 704,808

Accrued severance pay - 429,922
-------------- --------------

Total liabilities 558,909 1,134,730
-------------- --------------

STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Preferred stock, $.001 par value;
5,000,000 shares authorized; none issued and outstanding - -
Common stock, $.001 par value;
50,000,000 shares authorized; 18,261,567 and 17,593,896
issued and outstanding, respectively 18,262 17,594
Additional paid-in capital 40,533,593 40,526,583
Other accumulated comprehensive income 84,270 36,934
Deficit accumulated during the development stage (40,370,429) (35,125,678)
Less: deferred compensation (9,661) (39,216)
-------------- --------------

Total stockholders' equity 256,035 5,416,217
-------------- --------------

Total liabilities and stockholders' equity $ 814,944 $ 6,550,947
============== ==============

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
F-2






TTR TECHNOLOGIES INC. AND ITS SUBSIDIARY
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

From
Inception
Year (July 14,
Ended 1994) to
December 31, December 31,
2002 2001 2000 2002
---- ---- ---- ----


Revenue $ - $ - $ 1,999 $ 125,724
-------------- ------------- -------------- --------------

Expenses
Research and development (1) 701,629 949,766 1,111,889 5,704,131
Sales and marketing (1) 159,486 399,523 579,006 4,457,457
General and administrative (1) 3,050,620 2,894,616 1,785,434 11,071,440
Stock-based compensation 35,251 909,819 1,631,649 11,399,660
Bad debt expense 161,000 - - 161,000
-------------- ------------- -------------- --------------
Total expenses 4,107,986 5,153,724 5,107,978 32,793,688
-------------- ------------- -------------- --------------

Operating loss (4,107,986) (5,153,724) (5,105,979) (32,667,964)
-------------- ------------- -------------- --------------

Other (income) expense
Legal settlement - - - 232,500
Loss on investment - - - 17,000
Other income - - - (75,000)
Net losses of affiliate 369,409 618,090 209,157 1,196,656
Impairment loss on investment in
affiliate 748,690 - - 748,690
Amortization of deferred financing
costs - - - 4,516,775
Interest income (37,808) (276,179) (524,253) (900,235)
Interest expense 56,474 3,002 5,810 1,966,079
-------------- ------------- -------------- --------------

Total other (income) expenses 1,136,765 344,913 (309,286) 7,702,465
-------------- ------------- -------------- --------------

Net loss $ (5,244,751) $(5,498,637) $ (4,796,693) $(40,370,429)
============== ============= ============== ==============

Per share data:

Basic and diluted $ (0.29) $ (0.31) $ (0.30)
============== ============= ==============

Weighted average number
of common shares used in
basic and diluted loss per share 17,827,893 17,560,013 16,006,403
============== ============= ==============


(1) Excludes non-cash, stock-based compensation expense as follows:

Research and development $ - $ - $ 230,258 $ 456,239
Sales and marketing 30,587 261,463 78,732 5,336,558
General and administrative 4,664 648,356 1,322,659 5,606,863
-------------- ------------- -------------- --------------

$ 35,251 $ 909,819 $ 1,631,649 $ 11,399,660
============== ============= ============== ==============

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
F-3






TTR TECHNOLOGIES INC. AND ITS SUBSIDIARY
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE LOSS

From
Inception
Year (July 14,
Ended 1994) to
December 31, December 31,
2002 2001 2000 2002
---- ---- ---- ----


Net loss $ (5,244,751) $ (5,498,637) $ (4,796,693) $ (40,370,429)

Other comprehensive income (loss)
Foreign currency translation
adjustments 47,336 (9,312) (10,725) 84,270
-------------- ------------- -------------- --------------

Comprehensive loss $ (5,197,415) $ (5,507,949) $ (4,807,418) $ (40,286,159)
============== ============= ============== ==============

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
F-4






TTR TECHNOLOGIES INC. AND ITS SUBSIDIARY
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
From
Year Inception
Ended (July 14, 1994)
December 31, to December 31,
2002 2001 2000 2002
---- ---- ---- ----

INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net loss $ (5,244,751) $ (5,498,637) $ (4,796,693) $ (40,370,429)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss
to net cash used by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization 83,716 85,597 58,066 949,024
Forgiveness of note receivable, officer 33,333 - - 33,333
Loss from write-down of fixed assets 162,192 - - 162,192
Bad debt expense 161,000 - - 161,000
Amortization of note discount and finance costs - - - 4,666,225
Translation adjustment - - - (1,528)
Beneficial conversion feature of convertible debt - - - 572,505
Stock, warrants and options issued for services and legal
settlement 35,251 909,819 1,631,649 11,572,621
Payment of common stock issued with guaranteed selling price - - - (155,344)
Net losses of affiliate 369,409 618,090 209,157 1,196,656
Impairment loss on investment in affiliate 748,690 - - 748,690
Increase (decrease) in cash attributable
to changes in assets and liabilities
Accounts receivable 950 929 9,297 554
Prepaid expenses and other current assets 55,256 (57,063) (62,030) (94,723)
Other assets (2,750) (3,550) 3,700 (6,300)
Accounts payable (3,129) 105,120 (355,881) (49,294)
Accrued expenses (80,778) 596,054 (171,181) 1,148,009
Accrued severance pay (400,704) 122,141 97,962 (122,363)
Interest payable - - - 251,019
------------- -------------- -------------- ---------------

Net cash used by operating activities (4,082,315) (3,121,500) (3,375,954) (19,338,153)
------------- -------------- -------------- ---------------

CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Proceeds from sales of fixed assets 31,022 2,837 28,637 68,594
Purchases of property and equipment (111,665) (86,931) (105,354) (986,535)
Investment in ComSign, Ltd. - - (2,000,000) (2,000,000)
Increase in note receivable, officer (100,000) - - (100,000)
Increase in note receivable - (130,000) - (130,000)
Increase in organization costs - - - (7,680)
------------- -------------- -------------- ---------------

Net cash used by investing activities (180,643) (214,094) (2,076,717) (3,155,621)
------------- -------------- -------------- ---------------

CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Proceeds from issuance of common stock 1,982 17,250 13,493,722 21,177,354
Stock offering costs - - - (475,664)
Deferred financing costs - - - (682,312)
Proceeds from short-term borrowings - - - 1,356,155
Proceeds from long-term debt - - - 2,751,825
Proceeds from convertible debentures - - - 2,000,000
Repayment of short-term borrowings - - - (1,357,082)
Repayments of long-term debt - - (16,308) (1,615,825)
------------- -------------- -------------- ---------------

Net cash provided by financing activities 1,982 17,250 13,477,414 23,154,451
------------- -------------- -------------- ---------------

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash (408) (1,073) 363 (6,792)
------------- -------------- -------------- ---------------

INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS (4,261,384) (3,319,417) 8,025,106 653,885

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT BEGINNING OF PERIOD 4,915,269 8,234,686 209,580 -
------------- -------------- -------------- ---------------

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT END OF PERIOD $ 653,885 $ 4,915,269 $ 8,234,686 $ 653,885
============= ============== ============== ===============

SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF
CASH FLOW INFORMATION
Cash paid during the period for interest $ 882 $ 3,002 $ 869 $ 476,910
============= ============== ============== ===============

Noncash financing and investing activity
Conversion of debt and accrued interest to common stock $ - $ - $ - $ 3,379,696
============= ============== ============== ===============


See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
F-5






TTR TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND ITS SUBSIDIARY
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIT)


Common Stock Additional
Common Stock Subscribed Paid-in
Shares Amount Shares Amount Capital
-------------- ------------- -------------- -------------- --------------

Balances at July 14, 1994 (date of inception) - $ - - $ - $ -

Issuances of common stock, par value $.001
Services rendered 1,200,000 1,200
Cash 1,200,000 1,200 23,800

Net loss
-------------- ------------- -------------- -------------- --------------
Balances at December 31, 1994 2,400,000 2,400 - - 23,800

Common stock contributed (561,453) (561) 561
Issuances of common stock, par value $.001
Services rendered 361,453 361 17,712
Stock options and warrants granted 600
Foreign currency translation adjustment
Net loss
-------------- ------------- -------------- -------------- --------------

Balances at December 31, 1995 2,200,000 2,200 - - 42,673

Issuances of common stock, par value $.001
Cash, net of offering costs of $11,467 850,000 850 362,683
Foreign currency translation adjustment
Net loss
-------------- ------------- -------------- -------------- --------------
Balances at December 31, 1996 3,050,000 3,050 - - 405,356

Common stock contributed (135,000) (135) 135

Issuances of common stock, par value $.001
Cash, net of offering costs of $832,551 908,000 908 5,000,440
Services rendered 74,000 74 832,551
Exercise of options 374,548 375 3,370
Common stock subscriptions 16,000 100,000
Sale of Underwriters warrants 80
Stock options and warrants granted 1,875,343
Amortization of deferred compensation
Foreign currency translation adjustment
Net loss
-------------- ------------- -------------- -------------- --------------
Balances at December 31, 1997 4,271,548 4,272 16,000 100,000 8,117,275

Common stock subscriptions 16,000 16 (16,000) (100,000) 99,984
Common Stock forfeited (1,000,000) (1,000) 1,000
Transfer of temporary equity to permanent capital 15,000 15 77,141
Issuances of common stock, par value $.001
Cash 41,667 42 24,958
Services rendered 244,000 244 620,344
Stock options and warrants granted (cancelled) (255,992)
Discount relating to shares and warrants issued 156,111 156 486,307
Amortization of deferred compensation
Warrant exchange 432,000 432 (432)
Foreign currency translation adjustment
Net loss
-------------- ------------- -------------- -------------- --------------
- -
Balances at December 31, 1998 4,176,326 4,177 9,170,585

Issuances of common stock, par value $.001
Cash 314,774 315 225,140
Services rendered 1,227,000 1,227 1,669,548
Exercise of option 1,714,952 1,715 1,401,660
Stock options granted (cancelled) 4,449,015
Conversion of debt into common stock 3,220,508 3,221 3,376,748
Fair value of warrants associated with
financing agreement 3,845,400
Amortization of deferred compensation
Value assigned to beneficial conversion feature
of convertible notes 572,505
Foreign currency translation adjustment
Net loss
-------------- ------------- -------------- -------------- --------------
Balances at December 31, 1999 10,653,560 10,654 - - 24,710,602

Issuances of common stock, par value $.001
Cash, net of offering costs of $730,000 3,680,937 3,681 13,266,319
Services rendered 16,269 16 114,609
Exercise of options and warrants 3,005,574 3,006 220,716
Stock options granted 2,028,720
Amortization of deferred compensation
Foreign currency translation adjustment
Net loss
-------------- ------------- -------------- -------------- --------------
Balances at December 31, 2000 17,356,340 17,357 - - 40,340,966

Issuances of common stock, par value $.001
Exercise of options and warrants 237,556 238 17,012
Stock options granted 168,604
Amortization of deferred compensation
Foreign currency translation adjustment
Net loss
-------------- ------------- -------------- -------------- --------------
Balances at December 31, 2001 17,593,896 17,594 - - 40,526,583

Issuances of common stock, par value $.001
Exercise of options and warrants 667,671 668 1,314
Stock options granted 5,696
Amortization of deferred compensation
Foreign currency translation adjustment
Net loss
-------------- ------------- -------------- -------------- --------------
Balances at December 31, 2002 18,261,567 $ 18,262 - $ - $ 40,533,593
============== ============= ============== ============== ==============



(CONTINUED)

Deficit
Foreign Accumulated
Currency During
Translation Development Deferred
Adjustment Stage Compensation Total
--------------- ----------- ------------ ---------
Balances at July 14, 1994 (date of inception) $ - $ $ - $ -

Issuances of common stock, par value $.001
Services rendered 1,200
Cash 25,000

Net loss (42,085) (42,085)
--------------- ----------- ----------- ----------
Balances at December 31, 1994 - (42,085) - (15,885)

Common stock contributed
Issuances of common stock, par value $.001
Services rendered 18,073
Stock options and warrants granted 600
Foreign currency translation adjustment 22,652 22,652
Net loss (896,663) (896,663)
--------------- ----------- ----------- ----------

Balances at December 31, 1995 22,652 (938,748) - (871,223)

Issuances of common stock, par value $.001
Cash, net of offering costs of $11,467 363,533
Foreign currency translation adjustment 35,044 35,044
Net loss (1,121,211) (1,121,211)
--------------- ----------- ----------- ----------
Balances at December 31, 1996 57,696 (2,059,959) (1,593,857)

Common stock contributed

Issuances of common stock, par value $.001
Cash, net of offering costs of $832,551 5,001,348
Services rendered (500,000) 332,625
Exercise of options 3,745
Common stock subscriptions 100,000
Sale of Underwriters warrants 80
Stock options and warrants granted (1,875,343)
Amortization of deferred compensation 972,567 972,567
Foreign currency translation adjustment (19,667) (19,667)
Net loss (4,119,612) (4,119,612)
--------------- ----------- ----------- ----------
Balances at December 31, 1997 38,029 (6,179,571) (1,402,776) 677,229

Common stock subscriptions
Common Stock forfeited
Transfer of temporary equity to permanent capital 77,156
Issuances of common stock, par value $.001
Cash 25,000
Services rendered (620,588) -
Stock options and warrants granted (cancelled) 255,992 -
Discount relating to shares and warrants issued 486,463
Amortization of deferred compensation 1,173,139 1,173,139
Warrant exchange -
Foreign currency translation adjustment 41,386 41,386
Net loss (5,578,540) (5,578,540)
--------------- ----------- ----------- ----------

Balances at December 31, 1998 79,415 (11,758,111) (594,233) (3,098,160)

Issuances of common stock, par value $.001
Cash 225,457
Services rendered (445,725) 1,225,05
Exercise of option 1,403,37
Stock options granted (cancelled) (613,435) 3,835,58
Conversion of debt into common stock 3,379,96
Fair value of warrants associated with
financing agreement 3,845,40
Amortization of deferred compensation 1,374,518 1,374,51
Value assigned to beneficial conversion feature
of convertible notes 572,505
Foreign currency translation adjustment (22,444) (22,444)
Net loss (13,072,237) (13,072,237)
--------------- ------------ ----------- -----------
Balances at December 31, 1999 56,971 (24,830,348) (278,875) (330,996)

Issuances of common stock, par value $.001
Cash, net of offering costs of $730,000 13,270,000
Services rendered 114,625
Exercise of options and warrants 223,722
Stock options granted (2,028,720)
Amortization of deferred compensation 1,527,024 1,527,024
Foreign currency translation adjustment (10,725) (10,725)
Net loss (4,796,693) (4,796,693)
--------------- ----------- ----------- ---------
Balances at December 31, 2000 46,246 (29,627,041) (780,571) 9,996,957

Issuances of common stock, par value $.001
Exercise of options and warrants 17,250
Stock options granted (168,604)
Amortization of deferred compensation 909,959 909,959
Foreign currency translation adjustment (9,312) (9,312)
Net loss (5,498,637) (5,498,637)
--------------- ----------- ----------- ---------
Balances at December 31, 2001 36,934 (35,125,678) (39,216) 5,416,217

Issuances of common stock, par value $.001
Exercise of options and warrants 1,982
Stock options granted (5,696)
Amortization of deferred compensation 35,251 35,251
Foreign currency translation adjustment 47,336 47,336
Net loss (5,244,751) (5,244,751)
--------------- ----------- ----------- ---------
Balances at December 31, 2002 $ 84,270 $(40,370,429) (9,661) $ 256,035
=============== =========== =========== =========

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
F-6




TTR TECHNOLOGIES INC. AND ITS SUBSIDIARY
(A Development Stage Company)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 1 - DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS

TTR Inc. (the "Company") was incorporated on July 14, 1994 under the
laws of the State of Delaware. In December 1998 the Company amended its
certificate of incorporation to change its name to TTR Technologies, Inc.

TTR Technologies Ltd., ("TTR Ltd") was formed under the laws of the
State of Israel on December 5, 1994 as a wholly owned research and development
subsidiary of the Company.

From the date of its inception through the execution of the Asset
Purchase Agreement referred to below, the Company was principally engaged in the
design, development and commercialization of proprietary software security
products.

The Company is considered to be in the development stage and has earned
limited revenues to date. Business activities to date have focused on product
and marketing research, product development, and raising capital.

In November 1999, the Company and Macrovision Corporation
("Macrovision") entered into an Alliance Agreement, as subsequently amended (the
"Alliance Agreement") to jointly develop music copy protection technology for
optical based media. In connection with such agreement, the Company granted to
Macrovision an exclusive world-wide, royalty-bearing license to use the
Company's proprietary technology through December 31, 2009. Under the Alliance
Agreement, the Company is entitled to a 30% royalty based on the net revenues
collected by Macrovision or its affiliates from any products or components
incorporating these products. Also, under certain conditions, the exclusive
license may revert to a non-exclusive license as of the second anniversary of
the Commercial Launch, as defined in the Alliance Agreement.

In November 2002, the Company and Macrovision entered into an Asset
Purchase Agreement (the "Purchase Agreement") pursuant to which Macrovision,
together with certain of its affiliates (the "Purchaser") is to purchase all of
the intellectual property of the Company that relate to the copy protection
technology for $5.25 million in cash, subject to certain potential downward
adjustments not to exceed $400,000, payable at the closing of the asset sale. In
addition, at closing, Macrovision will return 1,880,937 shares of the Company's
common stock, par value $0.001 (the "Common Stock"), for eventual cancellation
and return to the Company's treasury, that Macrovision purchased from the
Company in January 2000 in connection with its then concluded equity investment
in the Company of $4 million. The closing of the asset sale is subject to
shareholder approval, which was obtained on January 15, 2003 and satisfaction of
certain conditions, including the procurement of certain consents from the
Office of the Chief Scientist of the Israeli Ministry of Trade and Commerce
("OCS").

Under the terms of the Purchase Agreement, if the transactions
contemplated by the Purchase Agreement do not close by March 15, 2003, either
party has the right to terminate such agreement at any time. The closing did not
occur, however, neither party has elected to terminate the Purchase Agreement
and, as of March 31, 2003 both the Company and Macrovision continue to work
toward a closing. Upon and, subject to, the closing of the asset sale under the
Purchase Agreement, the Company will cease to be engaged in the field the copy
protection which is the only business it has been actively engaged in since its
inception.

If the closing under the Purchase Agreement does not occur within the
second quarter of 2003, then the Company anticipates that it will need to raise
cash on an immediate basis in order to defend its interests and assert its
rights under the Alliance Agreement as well as resume certain of its activities
in the copy protection field. If the closing under the Purchase Agreement does
occur, then the Company anticipates exploring various alternatives, such as the
strategic acquisition of an existing business.

F-7


TTR TECHNOLOGIES INC. AND ITS SUBSIDIARY
(A Development Stage Company)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

During 2002, the Company relocated to the United States all of its
research and development and design activities and in consequence thereof,
terminated all such activity formerly carried out at the TTR Ltd. facility. All
related wind-down costs and expenses of TTR Ltd. have been recorded during the
year ended 2002.

GOING CONCERN

As fully described above, the Company's anticipated sale of its copy
protection technology to Macrovision and the related receipt of the net sales
proceeds therefrom, is contingent upon and, subject to, satisfying certain
conditions with the OCS. Those factors and the related contingency creates an
uncertainty about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern in the
event such transaction is not consummated. The Company is currently working with
Macrovision and the OSC to achieve a timely closing. The ability of the Company
to continue as a going concern is dependent upon the consummation of the
transaction. The consolidated financial statements do not include any
adjustments that might be necessary if the Company is unable to continue as a
going concern.

NOTE 2 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

PRINCIPLES OF CONSOLIDATION

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the
Company and its wholly owned subsidiary, TTR Ltd. All significant inter-company
accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. Certain
consolidated amounts have been reclassified for consistent presentation.

USE OF ESTIMATES

Management uses estimates and assumptions in preparing these financial
statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Those
estimates and assumptions affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities,
the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities and the reported revenues
and expenses. Actual results could vary from the estimates that were used.

CASH EQUIVALENTS

Cash equivalents consist of short-term, highly liquid debt investments
that are readily convertible into cash with original maturities when purchased
of three months or less.

FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

Substantially all of the Company's financial instruments, consisting
primarily of cash equivalents, current receivables, accounts payable and accrued
expenses, are carried at, or approximate, fair value because of their short-term
nature or because they carry market rates of interest.

REVENUE RECOGNITION

The Company recognizes licensing software revenue in accordance with
Statement of Position 97-2, "Software Revenue Recognition", and related
interpretations, when delivery has occurred, the fee for the software is fixed
or determinable, collectability is reasonably assured and a written software
license agreement has been signed by the Company and the customer.

F-8


TTR TECHNOLOGIES INC. AND ITS SUBSIDIARY
(A Development Stage Company)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

STOCK BASED COMPENSATION

The Company accounts for stock-based compensation in accordance with
APB Opinion No. 25, "Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees" and Financial
Accounting Standard Board ("FASB") Interpretation No. 44, "Accounting for
Certain Transactions Involving Stock Compensation". Pursuant to these accounting
standards, the Company records deferred compensation for share options granted
to employees at the date of grant based on the difference between the exercise
price of the options and the market value of the underlying shares at that date.
Deferred compensation is amortized to compensation expense over the vesting
period of the underlying options. No compensation expense is recorded for fixed
stock options that are granted to employees and directors at an exercise price
equal to the fair market value of the common stock at the time of the grant.

Stock options and warrants granted to non-employees are recorded at
their fair value, as determined in accordance with Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 123 ("SFAS 123") and Emerging Issues Task Force
Consensus No. 96-18, and recognized over the related service period. Deferred
charges for options granted to non-employees are periodically re-measured as the
options vest.

The Company has adopted the disclosure provisions required by SFAS No.
148 "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation-Transition and Disclosure" which
amends SFAS No. 123. Accordingly, see below and Note 9 for disclosures required
in accordance with SFAS No. 148.

Had compensation cost for all of the Company's stock-based compensation
grants been determined in a manner consistent with the fair value approach
described in SFAS No. 123 and amended by SFAS No. 148, the Company's net loss
and net loss per share as reported would have been increased to the pro forma
amounts indicated below:



Year ended
December 31,
2002 2001 2000
---- ---- ----

Net loss
As reported $(5,244,751) $(5,498,637) $(4,796,693)

Add: Stock-based employee compensation
expense included in reported
net loss, net of related tax effects 35,251 264,136 816,964

Deduct: Total stock-based employee
compensation expense determined
under fair value based method
for all awards, net of related
tax effects (494,124) (1,393,060) (4,138,513)
--------- --------- ---------
Pro forma $(5,703,624) $(6,627,561) $(8,118,242)
========= ========= =========

Net loss per share, basic and diluted
As reported $(0.29) $(0.31) $(0.30)
==== ==== ====
Pro forma $(0.32) $(0.38) $(0.51)
==== ==== ====

F-9


TTR TECHNOLOGIES INC. AND ITS SUBSIDIARY
(A Development Stage Company)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The fair value of each option granted in 2002, 2001 and 2000 is
estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with
the following weighted-average assumptions:


2002 2001 2000
---- ---- ----

Risk free interest rates 3.45% 3.97% 6.32%
Expected option lives 3.14 3.26 2.46
Expected volatilities 145.00% 106.00% 70.00%
Expected dividend yields None None None

FOREIGN CURRENCY TRANSLATIONS

The financial statements of TTR Ltd. have been translated into U.S.
dollars in accordance with Statement No. 52 of the Financial Accounting
Standards Board (FASB). Assets and liabilities have been translated at year-end
(period-end) exchange rates and statement of operations have been translated at
average rates prevailing during the year. The translation adjustments have been
recorded as a separate component in the consolidated statement of stockholders'
equity (deficit).

NET LOSS PER SHARE

Basic earnings (loss) per share, "EPS" is computed by dividing net
income (loss) applicable to common shares by the weighted-average of common
shares outstanding during the period.

Diluted earnings (loss) per share adjusts basic earnings (loss) per
share for the effects of convertible securities, stock options and other
potentially dilutive instruments, only in the periods in which such effect is
dilutive. The shares issuable upon exercise of stock options and warrants are
excluded from the calculation of net loss per share, as their effect would be
antidilituve.

DEPRECIATION AND AMORTIZATION

Furniture, equipment and vehicles are recorded at cost and depreciated
using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets,
which range from three to fourteen years. For leasehold improvements,
amortization is provided over the shorter of the estimated useful lives of the
assets or the lease term. During the year ended 2002, the majority of the
property (exclusive of intellectual property) and equipment related to TTR Ltd.
was either sold or written-off.

RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT COSTS

Research and development expenditures are charged to operations as
incurred. Software development costs are required to be capitalized when a
product's technological feasibility has been established by completion of a
working model of the product and ending when a product is available for general
release to customers. To date, completion of a working model of the Company's
products and general release have substantially coincided. As a result, the
Company has not capitalized any software development costs since such costs have
not been significant.

F-10


TTR TECHNOLOGIES INC. AND ITS SUBSIDIARY
(A Development Stage Company)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

INCOME TAXES

The Company uses the liability method to determine its income tax
expense. This method requires the establishment of a deferred tax asset or
liability for the recognition of future deductible or taxable amounts and
operating loss carry-forwards. Deferred tax expense or benefit is recognized as
a result of the changes in the assets and liabilities during the year. Valuation
allowances are established when necessary, to reduce deferred tax assets, if it
is more likely than not that all or a portion of it will not be realized.

CONCENTRATIONS

Cash and cash equivalents are, for the most part, maintained with major
financial institutions. Deposits held with these banks exceed the amount of
insurance provided on such deposits. Generally, these deposits may be redeemed
upon demand and therefore, bear minimal risk.

IMPAIRMENT OF LONG-LIVED ASSETS

The Company reviews its long-lived assets for impairment whenever
events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset
may not be recoverable from future undiscounted cash flows. Impairment losses
are recorded for the excess, if any, of the carrying value over the fair value
of the long-lived assets.

COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)

In January 1998, the Company adopted SFAS 130, "Reporting Comprehensive
Income," which establishes standards for reporting the components of
comprehensive income. The foreign currency translation adjustment is the
Company's only component of comprehensive income.

RECENTLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

In June 2002, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 146, ("SFAS 146") "Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or
Disposal Activities." SFAS 146 requires that a liability for a cost associated
with an exit or disposal activity be recognized when the liability is incurred.
SFAS 146 requires that the initial measurement of a liability be at fair value.
SFAS 146 will be effective for exit or disposal activities that are initiated
after December 31, 2002. The Company has adopted SFAS 146 effective January 1,
2003 and does not expect that the adoption will have a material impact on its
consolidated financial statements.

In December 2002, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 148 ("SFAS 148"), "Accounting for Stock-Based
Compensation-Transition and Disclosure." This statement amends and supersedes
FASB Statement No. 123 "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation." The Company
has adopted the disclosure provisions of SFAS 148 as of December 31, 2002 and
has included the required disclosures in Note 2 and 9 to its consolidated
financial statements.

F-11


TTR TECHNOLOGIES INC. AND ITS SUBSIDIARY
(A Development Stage Company)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 3 - NOTE RECEIVABLE

In July 2001, in connection with a consulting agreement, the Company
advanced a loan to a consultant in the amount of $130,000, evidenced by a
promissory note. The note bears interest at the rate of 8% per annum, and was
due on June 27, 2002. As collateral for the loan, the consultant pledged 150,000
Company shares of Common Stock issuable to him upon the exercise of 150,000
unexercised options. Pursuant to consulting agreements, the consultant was
granted 50,000 and 100,000 immediately vested options exercisable at $.35 and
$6.00 per share, respectively. During 2002, the Company recorded a bad debt
expense of $130,000 in connection with the non-payment of the note. Management
believes collection of the full amount due under the promissory note is
doubtful.

In May 2002, in accordance with the terms of an employment agreement
with an officer, the Company loaned the officer $100,000 for a three-year term
with interest at the rate of four percent per annum. At the end of each calendar
year beginning December 31, 2002, the Company has agreed to forgive one-third of
the loan and the related accrued interest thereon as additional compensation,
except under certain conditions where the officer resigns or his employment is
terminated by the Company for cause. Accordingly, at December 31, 2002 the
Company recorded $34,224 as compensation to the officer under the terms of the
employment agreement.

NOTE 4 - PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT

Property and equipment consist of the following:

December 31,
2002 2001
---- ----
Computer equipment $30,097 $315,361
Leasehold improvements -- 109,178
Office equipment 16,258 96,970
Vehicles 27,579 124,251
------- --------
73,934 645,760
Less: Accumulated depreciation (50,841) (444,307)
------- --------
Property and Equipment, net $23,093 $201,453
======= ========

Depreciation expense was $83,716, $85,597 and $58,066 for the years
ended December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000 respectively. During the year ended 2002,
the majority of the property (except for intellectual property) and equipment
related to the TTR Ltd. was either sold or written-off.

F-12


TTR TECHNOLOGIES INC. AND ITS SUBSIDIARY
(A Development Stage Company)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 5 - INVESTMENT IN COMSIGN, LTD.

In July 2000, the Company invested $2 million for a 50% equity interest
in ComSign Ltd. ("ComSign"), a newly established subsidiary of Comda Ltd.
("Comda"), a private Israeli company. ComSign is engaged in the distribution and
delivery of digital authentication certificates of VeriSign, Inc. ("VeriSign").
In June 2000, ComSign entered into an agreement with VeriSign to act as
VeriSign's sole principal affiliate in Israel and the territories administered
by the Palestinian Authority. Under the provisions of the agreement with Comda
60% of any dividends up to an accumulated amount of $2,000,000 will first be
distributed to TTR and 40% to Comda. Thereafter, 60% of dividends up to an
accumulated amount of $2,000,000 will first be distributed to Comda and 40% to
TTR. Subsequently, all dividends will be distributed 50% to each.

The Company applies the equity method of accounting for this
investment. At the time of the investment the carrying value of the investment
exceeded the Company's share of the underlying net assets of ComSign. The excess
is considered to be goodwill and was being amortized on a straight-line basis
over five years.



Based on information made available to the Company in 2002, management
believes that there has been a significant decrease in the fair market value of
the Company's investment in ComSign and, that as a consequence thereof, the
Company believes the investment to have been impaired. Accordingly, the Company
wrote-off during the year ended 2002 the amount of $748,690, representing the
remaining goodwill and the balance of its investment.

Condensed summarized financial data for ComSign, Ltd. as of and for the
year ended December 31, 2002 are as follows:


Condensed balance sheet data
Current assets $ 853,396
Noncurrent assets $1,215,282
Current liabilities $1,560,293
Noncurrent liabilities $ 495,000
Shareholders' equity $ 13,386

Condensed statement of operations data
Revenue $ 423,617
Net loss $ (738,808)

NOTE 6 - ACCRUED EXPENSES

Accrued expenses consist of the following:


December 31,
2002 2001
---- ----
Accrued payroll and related taxes $21,032 $250,591
Accrued severance, current portion -- 249,714
Other 39,979 53,103
------- -------
Total Accrued Expenses $61,011 $553,408
======= =======

F-13


TTR TECHNOLOGIES INC. AND ITS SUBSIDIARY
(A Development Stage Company)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 7- ACCRUED SEVERANCE PAY

Under Israeli law, TTR Ltd. is required to make severance payments to
dismissed employees, including officers, and to employees leaving employment
under certain other circumstances. This liability is calculated based on the
years of employment for each employee, in accordance with the "severance pay
laws." Paying into severance pay funds and the purchase of insurance policies
covers the Company's liabilities for required severance payments. Since the
Company terminated all activities in Israel during 2002, all required severance
payments were paid to eligible employees prior to December 31, 2002.

NOTE 8 - INCOME TAXES

At December 31, 2002, the Company had available approximately $16
million of net operating loss carryforwards for U.S. federal income tax purposes
which expire in the years 2014 through 2022, and approximately $11 million of
foreign net operating loss carryforwards with no expiration date. Due to the
uncertainty of their realization, no income tax benefit has been recorded by the
Company for these net operating loss carryforwards as valuation allowances have
been established for any such benefits. The use of the U.S. federal net
operating loss carryforwards is subject to limitations under Section 382 of the
Internal Revenue Code pertaining to changes in stock ownership.

Significant components of the Company's deferred tax assets for U.S.
federal and Israel income taxes are as follows:

December 31,
------------
2002 2001
---- ----
Net operating loss carryforwards $9,528,747 $7,992,108
Stock based compensation 833,763 821,778
Other 240,058 282,099
--------- ---------
Total deferred tax assets 10,602,568 9,095,985
Valuation allowance (10,602,568) (9,095,985)
---------- ---------
Net deferred tax assets $ -- $ --
========= ==========

F-14


TTR TECHNOLOGIES INC. AND ITS SUBSIDIARY
(A Development Stage Company)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 9 - STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY

STOCK OPTION PLANS

In July 1996, the Board of Directors adopted the Company's Incentive
and Non-qualified Stock Option Plan (the "Plan") and has reserved up to 450,000
shares of Common Stock for issuance thereunder. In December 1999, the Plan was
amended to increase the total number of shares available for grant to 1.5
million. As of December 31, 2002 a total of 774,566 options were outstanding
under the 1996 Plan and future grants have been discontinued.

In July 1998, the Board of Directors adopted the Non-Executive
Directors Stock Option Plan ("the Directors' Plan") and has reserved up to
25,000 shares of common stock for issuance thereunder. In May 2001, the Plan was
amended to increase the total number of shares available for grant to 75,000.
During 2002, the Company adopted the 2002 Non-Employee Directors' Plan (the
"2002 Directors' Plan") which provides for 275,000 shares available for grant.
Both plans provide for the grant of options to directors who are not otherwise
employed by the Company. As of December 31, 2002, outstanding options under the
Directors' Plan and the 2002 Directors' Plan totaled 210,000.

In July 2000, the Company adopted the 2000 Equity Incentive Plan (the
"2000 Incentive Plan") and has reserved a total of 1.5 million shares of common
stock for issuance thereunder. In May 2001, the Plan was amended to increase the
total number of shares available for grant to 3,500,000. The 2000 Incentive Plan
provides for the grant of incentive stock options, nonqualified stock options,
stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, bonus stock, awards in lieu of cash
obligations, other stock-based awards and performance units. The 2000 Incentive
Plan also permits cash payments under certain conditions. As of December 31,
2002, there were 2,122,309 options outstanding under the 2000 Incentive Plan.

The Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors is responsible for
determining the type of award, when and to whom awards are granted, the number
of shares and the terms of the awards and exercise prices. The options are
exercisable for a period not to exceed ten years from the date of grant. Vesting
periods range from immediately to five years.

F-15


TTR TECHNOLOGIES INC. AND ITS SUBSIDIARY
(A Development Stage Company)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

OTHER OPTION GRANTS

In addition to the options granted under the Stock Option Plans, the
Company has issued options outside of the plans, pursuant to various agreements.

Stock option activity for 2000, 2001 and 2002 is summarized as follows:



Weighted
Average
Options Exercise
Plan Non-plan Total Price
---- -------- -----

Options outstanding, January 1, 2000 749,400 196,000 945,400 $0.47
Granted 2,238,500 -- 2,238,500 3.86
Exercised (200,000) (146,000) (346,000) 0.23
Forfeited (2,275) -- (2,275) 5.19
--------- ------- ---------

Options outstanding, December 31, 2000 2,785,625 50,000 2,835,625 3.18
Granted 575,000 -- 575,000 3.53
Exercised (80,000) (50,000) (130,000) 0.01
Forfeited (4,000) -- (4,000) 6.03
--------- ------ ---------
Options outstanding, December 31, 2001 3,276,625 -- 3,276,625 3.36
Granted 905,000 -- 905,000 0.85
Exercised (332,150) -- (332,150) 0.01
Forfeited (742,600) -- (742,600) 4.11
--------- ------ ---------
Options outstanding, December 31, 2002 3,106,875 -- 3,106,875 $2.81
========= ====== =========




Shares of common stock available for
future grant under all plans 1,517,691
=========


F-16


TTR TECHNOLOGIES INC. AND ITS SUBSIDIARY
(A Development Stage Company)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The following table summarizes information about stock options outstanding at
December 31, 2002:



Options Exercisable
Weighted Average Weighted Average
Remaining
Number Contractual Exercise Number Exercise
Ranges of price Outstanding Life Price Exercisable Price
- --------------- ----------- ---- ----- ----------- -----

$0.01 60,000 6.98 $0.01 60,000 $0.01
$0.16 50,000 9.77 $0.16 -- $0.00
$0.25-0.35 260,000 9.23 $0.27 50,000 $0.35
$1.00 550,000 9.33 $1.00 -- $0.00
$1.53-1.68 355,000 8.88 $1.66 44,167 $1.67
$2.56-3.56 324,941 7.29 $3.25 302,024 $3.30
$3.91-5.32 1,398,934 7.52 $4.15 1,361,434 $4.11
$6.00-7.00 108,000 1.77 $6.07 108,000 $6.07
--------- ---------
$.01-$7.00 3,106,875 7.94 $2.81 1,925,625 $3.82
========= =========


Weighted-average grant date fair value of options granted in 2002, 2001
and 2000, under the Black-Scholes option pricing model, was $0.69, $2.18, and
$2.10 per option, respectively.

WARRANTS

In May 2000, the Company granted 250,000, three-year warrants to a
consultant pursuant to a one-year consulting agreement. The agreement was
subsequently amended to reduce the number of warrants to 100,000, which vested
immediately. The exercise prices of the warrants are $4.13 per share. Using the
Black-Scholes model for estimating the fair value of the warrants, the Company
recorded a charge to operations of $123,175 in connection with this grant.

In June 2000, the Company granted 350,000 five-year warrants to a
consultant pursuant to a one-year consulting agreement. The warrants become
exercisable when the average weighted-bid price of the Company's Common Stock
exceeds $10 per share for twenty consecutive trading days. The exercise prices
of the warrants are $6.50, $7.50 and $8.50 for 125,000, 125,000 and 100,000
respectively. These warrants were cancelled in November 2002 in exchange for
300,000 shares of the Company's common stock.

These warrants are accounted for in accordance with the provisions of
EITF 96-18, Accounting for Equity Instruments that are Issued to Other than
Employees for Acquiring or in Conjunction with Selling, Goods or Services. Due
to the uncertainty of reaching the performance measures stipulated, the Company
has not recorded any expense relating to the issuance of the unvested warrants.
Upon determination that the achievement of the vesting thresholds is probable
("measurement date"), the Company will value the warrant and expense it over the
remaining period until the performance criteria is met.

In August 2000, the Company granted 200,000 five-year warrants to a
consultant pursuant to a one-year consulting agreement. The agreement was
subsequently amended to reduce the number of warrants to 100,000 which, vested
immediately. The warrants are not exercisable during the first two years from
the date of grant unless the Company's Common Stock has traded at or above $10
per share for fifteen consecutive trading days. The exercise prices of the
warrants are $7.50 per share. Using the Black-Scholes model for estimating the
fair value of the warrants, the Company recorded a charge to deferred
compensation of $262,670 and amortized this amount over the service period.

F-17


TTR TECHNOLOGIES INC. AND ITS SUBSIDIARY
(A Development Stage Company)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

In October 2000, the Company granted 400,000 four-year warrants to a
consultant pursuant to a one-year consulting agreement. The warrants vest
immediately but are not exercisable until one year from date of grant, unless
there is a sale or merger involving a majority of the assets of the Company. The
exercise prices of the warrants are $6.50, $7.50 and $8.50 for 134,000, 133,000
and 133,000, respectively. Using the Black-Scholes model for estimating the fair
value of the warrants, the Company recorded a charge to deferred compensation of
$483,772 and amortized this amount over the service period. These warrants were
exercised in October 2001 by way of a cash-less exercise.

STOCK ISSUANCES

During the year ended December 31, 2000, the Company completed the
following common stock transactions:

In January 2000, pursuant to its licensing and investment agreement
with Macrovision, the Company issued 1,880,937 shares of its Common Stock for an
aggregate purchase price of $4 million.

In February 2000, the Company completed a private placement of
1,800,000 shares of Common Stock and 900,000 Class A Warrants for an aggregate
purchase price of $10,000,000. The Class A Warrants are exercisable for a period
of 60 months at an exercise price per share of $8.84. The Company may redeem the
Class A Warrants for $0.10 per warrant if the common shares have traded at or
above 200% of the exercise price for a period of twenty consecutive trading
days. Upon exercise of the Class A Warrants, the Company will issue Class B
Warrants for an additional 450,000 shares. The Class B Warrants are exercisable
for a period of 36 months from the date of issuance at an exercise price per
share of $21.22. The Class B Warrants may be redeemed by the Company if the
common shares have trade at $26 or above for a period of twenty consecutive
trading days. The Company paid a placement agent a fee of $500,000 and issued
180,000 warrants exercisable at $5.56 per share, 90,000 Class A Warrants
exercisable at $8.84 and upon exercise an additional 45,000 Class B Warrants
exercisable at $21.22. Also, in connection with the private placement, the
Company paid $200,000 and issued 200,000 warrants, exercisable at $2.75, as a
finder's fee.

In January 2000, the Company issued 15,000 shares of Common Stock to a
consultant. The value of the services totaling $104,625 was charged to
operations.

In January 2000, the Company issued 1,269 shares of Common Stock in
payment of an outstanding liability in the amount of $10,000.

During 2000, the Company issued 3,005,574 shares of Common Stock from
the exercise of various outstanding stock options and warrants.


During the year ended December 31, 2001, the Company completed the
following common stock transactions:

The Company issued 237,556 shares of Common Stock from the exercise of
various outstanding stock options and warrants

During the year ended December 31, 2002, the Company completed the
following common stock transactions:

The Company issued 667,671 shares of Common Stock from the exercise and
exchange of various outstanding stock options and warrants.

F-18


TTR TECHNOLOGIES INC. AND ITS SUBSIDIARY
(A Development Stage Company)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 10 - COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

ROYALTIES

TTR Ltd. is committed to pay royalties to the OCS on proceeds from
sales of products of which the OCS has participated by way of grants. The
royalties are payable for the years of product sales, at the rate of 3% to 4.5%,
up to a maximum of 100% of the grants received plus accrued interest. The total
amount of grants received, as of December 31, 2002 was $210,000.

Any research and development grants are presented in the statement of
operations as a reduction of research and development expenses.

The refund of the grant is contingent on future sales and the Company
has no obligation to refund these grants if the sales are not sufficient.

In addition, the OCS has indicated that TTR must satisfy certain
conditions required by the OCS including possible payment of additional monetary
amounts in order for the sale of TTR's intellectual property to Macrovision, as
contemplated under the Purchase Agreement, to be consummated. If the sale of the
Company's copy protection business under the Purchase Agreement closes, then the
Company anticipates that the royalty obligations to the OCS will be assumed by
the Purchaser.

LITIGATION

The Company is a defendant in two different stockholders' actions filed
against the Company and certain of its current or former directors and officers
in the United States Federal Court for the Southern District of New York. The
actions allege, among other things, violations of the federal securities laws.
The Company believes it has meritorious defenses to these actions and has
defended against them vigorously. In one of the cases, the applicable court has
granted the Company's motion to dismiss the complaint. Subsequently, the
plaintiffs in that case have filed an amended complaint and the Company has
until April 14, 2003 to answer or move against that pleading. In the second
case, the Company made a motion to dismiss to which the plaintiffs filed an
amended complaint which deleted the prior claims concerning violations of the
federal securities laws but continues to assert claims for waste and
mismanagement. Plaintiffs filed a second amended complaint and the Company has
until April 14, 2003 to answer or move against this pleading. The Company's
Board of Directors has referred the plaintiffs' claims in the second action to a
Special Litigation Committee of the Board which is currently investigating the
matter. The Company has notified its insurer that it is seeking to recover,
among other things, its cost of defense to the extent provided in the policy.

Further, the Company's former attorneys began an action in January 2003
seeking unpaid legal fees of approximately $300,000. The Company's answer denies
the complaint's material allegations and alleges as defenses that it was
over-billed in unreasonable amounts and otherwise damaged by the law firms
failure to advise properly in one of the stockholders litigation cases discussed
above. The case is in the discovery stage. The Company has recorded the total
amount billed by the former attorneys as of December 31, 2002.

The outcome of the first two litigation cases described above is
uncertain and no estimate is available as to the amount of losses if any, which
could exceed the Company's insurance policy. Accordingly, in accordance with
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 5, the amount of the loss, if
any, that may be ultimately realized has not been reflected in the accompanying
financial statements.

F-19


TTR TECHNOLOGIES INC. AND ITS SUBSIDIARY
(A Development Stage Company)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

EMPLOYMENT, CONSULTING AND, TERMINATION AND SETTLEMENT AGREEMENTS

The Company has entered into, and amended various employment,
consulting and, termination and settlement agreements during 2000, 2001 and 2002
with certain of its officers and employees. During 2002 this included consulting
services provided by its former Chairman and former Vice President in the amount
of $165,000. All amounts due under the consulting and, termination and
settlement agreements have been reported in the Company's statement of
operations for the year ended 2002.

The Company's aggregate annual commitments under the existing
employment agreements are approximately $410,000 and $410,000 during 2003 and
2004. In addition, each of the correct employment agreements provides for
payments through the term of the employment agreement under certain
circumstances.

LEASE COMMITMENTS

The Company has terminated the leases for its facility and certain
equipment in Israel. All amounts due under such leases have been reported in the
Company's statements of operations for the year ended 2002. There are no future
minimum lease payments at December 31, 2002, since the only remaining lease
obligation is a month-to-month rental agreement for its New York office.


NOTE 11 - GEOGRAPHIC DATA

U.S. % of Total Israel % of Total
For the year ended
December 31, 2002
Revenue $ -- 0.00% $ -- 0.00%
Operating loss $(2,969,015) 72.27% $(1,138,971) 27.73%
Identifiable assets $ 765,530 93.94% $ 49,414 6.06%

For the year ended
December 31, 2001
Revenue $ -- 0.00% $ -- 0.00%
Operating loss $(2,589,846) 50.25% $(2,563,878) 49.75%
Identifiable assets $ 5,163,161 78.82% $ 1,387,786 21.18%

For the year ended
December 31, 2000
Revenue $ -- 0.00% $ 1,999 100.00%
Operating loss $(3,027,245) 59.29% $(2,078,734) 40.71%
Identifiable assets $ 8,297,774 80.18% $ 2,050,939 19.82%

NOTE 12 - QUARTERLY RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (UNAUDITED)



1st Qtr. 2nd Qtr. 3rd Qtr. 4th Qtr. Total
-------- -------- -------- -------- -----

2002
Revenues $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $ --
Net loss $ (950,152) $(1,887,785) $(1,166,735) $(1,240,079) $(5,244,751)
Net loss per share -
basic and diluted $ (.05) $ (.11) $ (.07) $ (.06)

2001
Revenues $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $ --
Net loss $(1,291,867) $(1,276,115) $(1,355,739) $(1,574,916) $(5,498,637)
Net loss per share -
basic and diluted $ (.07) $ (.07) $ (.08) $ (.09)

2000
Revenues $ 1,999 $ -- $ -- $ -- $ 1,999
Net loss $(1,563,727) $(1,025,946) $(1,213,842) $ (993,178) $(4,796,693)
Net loss per share -
basic and diluted $ (.12) $ (.06) $ (.07) $ (.06)


F-20