Back to GetFilings.com
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
|X| QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2004
Commission File Number: 333-45862
JOHN HANCOCK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Exact name of registrant as specified in charter
MASSACHUSETTS 04-1414660
(State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
incorporation or organization)
John Hancock Place
Post Office Box 111
Boston, Massachusetts 02117
(Address of principal executive offices)
(617) 572-6000
(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports
required to be filed by Section 3 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such
filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes |X| No |_|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as
defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes |_| No |X|
As of May 3, 2004 there were outstanding 1,000 shares of common stock, $0.01 par
value, of the registrant, all of which were owned by
John Hancock Financial Services, Inc.
Reduced Disclosure Format
Registrant meets the conditions set forth in General Instruction H(1) (a) and
(b) of Form 10-Q and is therefore filing this Form with the
educed Disclosure Format.
PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
JOHN HANCOCK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
March 31,
2004 December 31,
(unaudited) 2003
------------------------
(in millions)
Assets
Investments
Fixed maturities:
Held-to-maturity--at amortized cost
(fair value: March 31--$1,470.5; December 31--$1,512.8) ... $ 1,447.5 $ 1,488.7
Available-for-sale--at fair value
(cost: March 31--$46,057.1; December 31--$43,907.7) ....... 49,394.3 46,482.1
Equity securities:
Available-for-sale--at fair value
(cost: March 31--$196.8; December 31--$249.9) ............. 264.7 333.1
Trading securities--at fair value
(cost: March 31--$0.1; December 31--$0.1) ................. 0.6 0.6
Mortgage loans on real estate .................................. 10,722.3 10,871.1
Real estate .................................................... 121.3 123.8
Policy loans ................................................... 2,014.2 2,019.2
Short-term investments ......................................... 7.7 31.5
Other invested assets .......................................... 3,179.6 2,912.2
--------- ---------
Total Investments ..................................... 67,152.2 64,262.3
Cash and cash equivalents ...................................... 2,427.9 2,626.9
Accrued investment income ...................................... 751.1 700.5
Premiums and accounts receivable ............................... 113.5 104.1
Deferred policy acquisition costs .............................. 3,386.7 3,420.7
Reinsurance recoverable ........................................ 2,802.6 2,677.3
Other assets ................................................... 3,142.8 3,169.7
Separate account assets ........................................ 18,875.1 19,369.6
--------- ---------
Total Assets .......................................... $98,651.9 $96,331.1
========= =========
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited consolidated
financial statements.
2
JOHN HANCOCK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS - (CONTINUED)
March 31,
2004 December 31,
(unaudited) 2003
------------------------
(in millions)
Liabilities and Shareholder's Equity
Liabilities
Future policy benefits ..................................................... $39,503.7 $38,451.0
Policyholders' funds ....................................................... 21,968.3 21,693.5
Consumer notes ............................................................. 1,825.1 1,550.4
Unearned revenue - Note 1 .................................................. 392.1 406.9
Unpaid claims and claim expense reserves ................................... 182.5 166.5
Dividends payable to policyholders ......................................... 426.9 440.0
Short-term debt ............................................................ 75.9 104.0
Long-term debt ............................................................. 619.5 609.4
Income taxes ............................................................... 1,820.2 1,534.1
Other liabilities .......................................................... 4,755.2 4,417.7
Separate account liabilities ............................................... 18,875.1 19,369.6
--------- ---------
Total liabilities ................................................. 90,444.5 88,743.1
Minority interest .......................................................... 5.1 5.1
Commitments and contingencies - Note 4
Shareholder's Equity
Common stock, $10,000 par value; 1,000 shares authorized and outstanding ... 10.0 10.0
Additional paid in capital ................................................. 4,763.2 4,763.2
Retained earnings .......................................................... 1,486.4 1,332.1
Accumulated other comprehensive income ..................................... 1,942.7 1,477.6
--------- ---------
Total Shareholder's Equity ........................................ 8,202.3 7,582.9
--------- ---------
Total Liabilities and Shareholder's Equity ........................ $98,651.9 $96,331.1
========= =========
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited consolidated
financial statements.
3
JOHN HANCOCK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
Three Months Ended
March 31,
2004 2003
----------------------
(in millions)
Revenues
Premiums .................................................................... $ 470.7 $ 472.3
Universal life and investment-type product fees ............................. 176.8 155.0
Net investment income ....................................................... 983.5 933.1
Net realized investment and other gains (losses), net of related
amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs, amounts credited to
participating pension contractholders and the policyholder dividend
obligation $(0.8) and $(49.8) for the three months ended
March 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively) ................................... (97.7) 105.4
Investment management revenues, commissions and other fees .................. 132.4 119.2
Other revenue ............................................................... 71.2 72.1
-------- --------
Total revenues ........................................................ 1,736.9 1,857.1
Benefits and Expenses
Benefits to policyholders, excluding amounts related to net realized
investment and other gains (losses) credited to participating pension
contractholders and the policyholder dividend obligation $17.2 and
$(41.3) for the three months ended
March 31, 2004 and 2003 respectively .................................... 935.3 949.3
Other operating costs and expenses .......................................... 374.6 318.7
Amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs, excluding
amounts related to net realized investment and other gains (losses)
($(18.0) and $(8.5) for the three months ended March 31,
2004 and 2003, respectively) .............................................. 102.9 69.8
Dividends to policyholders .................................................. 116.6 132.5
-------- --------
Total benefits and expenses ........................................... 1,529.4 1,470.3
Income before income taxes and cumulative effect of
accounting change ........................................................... 207.5 386.8
Income taxes ................................................................... 49.9 115.8
-------- --------
Income before cumulative effect of accounting change ........................... 157.6 271.0
Cumulative effect of accounting change, net of income tax - Note 1 ............. (3.3) --
-------- --------
Net income ..................................................................... $ 154.3 $ 271.0
======== ========
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited consolidated
financial statements.
4
JOHN HANCOCK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDER'S EQUITY
AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
Accumulated
Additional Other Total
Common Paid in Retained Comprehensive Shareholder's Outstanding
Stock Capital Earnings Income (Loss) Equity Shares
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
(in millions, except for outstanding share amounts)
Balance at January 1, 2003 ...................... $10.0 $4,763.2 $ 956.1 $ 442.2 $6,171.5 1,000
Comprehensive income:
Net income ................................. 271.0 271.0
Other comprehensive income, net of tax:
Net unrealized gains (losses) ............ 307.5 307.5
Net accumulated gains (losses) on cash
flow hedges ............................ 5.8 5.8
Foreign currency translation
adjustment ............................. (0.1) (0.1)
Minimum pension liability ................ 1.7 1.7
--------
Comprehensive income ............................ 585.9
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Balance at March 31, 2003 ....................... $10.0 $4,763.2 $1,227.1 $ 757.1 $6,757.4 1,000
=============================================================================
Balance at January 1, 2004 ...................... $10.0 $4,763.2 $1,332.1 $1,477.6 $7,582.9 1,000
Comprehensive income:
Net income ................................. 154.3 154.3
Other comprehensive income, net of tax:
Net unrealized gains (losses) ............ 350.9 350.9
Net accumulated gains (losses) on cash
flow hedges ............................ 113.7 113.7
Foreign currency translation
adjustment ............................. -- --
Minimum pension liability ................ 0.5 0.5
--------
Comprehensive income ............................ 619.4
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Balance at March 31, 2004 ...................... $10.0 $4,763.2 $1,486.4 $1,942.7 $8,202.3 1,000
=============================================================================
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited consolidated
financial statements.
5
JOHN HANCOCK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
Three Months Ended
March 31,
2004 2003
---------------------------
(in millions)
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income...................................................................... $154.3 $271.0
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Amortization of discount - fixed maturities................................... 11.4 (6.9)
Net realized investment and other (gains) losses.............................. 97.7 (105.4)
Cumulative effect of accounting change........................................ 3.3 --
Change in deferred policy acquisition costs................................... -- (74.1)
Depreciation and amortization................................................. 11.4 11.6
Decrease (increase) in accrued investment income.............................. (50.6) 23.5
Decrease (increase) in premiums and accounts receivable....................... (9.4) 10.8
Increase in other assets and other liabilities, net........................... (59.2) (58.3)
Increase in policy liabilities and accruals, net.............................. 356.4 366.9
Increase in income taxes...................................................... 21.3 127.4
------------- ------------
Net cash provided by operating activities.............................. 536.6 566.5
Cash flows from investing activities:
Sales of:
Fixed maturities available-for-sale......................................... 1,849.2 2,376.0
Equity securities available-for-sale........................................ 79.2 16.9
Short-term investments and other invested assets............................ 79.5 55.0
Real estate................................................................. 8.2 4.5
Home Office properties...................................................... -- 887.6
Maturities, prepayments and scheduled redemptions of:
Fixed maturities held-to-maturity........................................... 35.7 83.4
Fixed maturities available-for-sale......................................... 996.4 993.5
Short-term investments and other invested assets............................ 24.7 46.7
Mortgage loans on real estate............................................... 507.8 195.9
Purchases of:
Fixed maturities held-to-maturity........................................... -- (2.0)
Fixed maturities available-for-sale......................................... (3,620.8) (4,525.6)
Equity securities available-for-sale........................................ (38.6) (0.6)
Real estate................................................................. (2.4) (2.4)
Short-term investments and other invested assets............................ (291.8) (211.6)
Mortgage loans on real estate issued........................................ (309.2) (363.3)
Other, net.................................................................... (77.9) (31.3)
------------- -------------
Net cash used in investing activities..................................... $(760.0) $(477.3)
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited consolidated
financial statements.
6
JOHN HANCOCK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS - (CONTINUED)
Three Months Ended
March 31,
2004 2003
--------------------
(in millions)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Universal life and investment-type contract deposits .................... $1,766.4 $2,738.7
Universal life and investment-type contract maturities and withdrawals .. (1,978.1) (1,781.6)
Issuance of consumer notes .............................................. 274.7 201.8
Issuance of short-term debt ............................................. -- 70.4
Issuance of long-term debt .............................................. 0.2 --
Repayment of short-term debt ............................................ (37.9) (75.3)
Repayment of long-term debt ............................................. (0.9) (3.1)
-------- --------
Net cash provided by financing activities ........................... 24.4 1,150.9
-------- --------
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents ................ (199.0) 1,240.1
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year ...................... 2,626.9 897.0
-------- --------
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period .......................... $2,427.9 $2,137.1
======== ========
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited consolidated
financial statements.
7
JOHN HANCOCK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (CONTINUED)
Note 1 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Business
John Hancock Life Insurance Company, (the Company), is a diversified financial
services organization that provides a broad range of insurance and investment
products and investment management and advisory services. The Company is a
wholly owned subsidiary of John Hancock Financial Services (JHFS). On April 28,
2004, JHFS completed its merger agreement with Manulife Financial Corporation
(Manulife) and as of the close of business JHFS common stock stopped trading on
the New York Stock Exchange. In accordance with the agreement, each share of
JHFS common stock was converted into 1.1853 shares of Manulife stock. Commencing
on April 28, 2004, the Company now operates as a subsidiary of Manulife and the
John Hancock name is Manulife's primary U.S. brand.
Basis of Presentation
The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements of the Company have
been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States for interim financial information and with the instructions to
Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all
of the information and footnotes required by accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States for complete financial statements. In the opinion
of management, these unaudited consolidated financial statements contain all
adjustments, consisting of only normal and recurring adjustments, necessary for
a fair presentation of the Company's financial position and results of
operations. Operating results for the three month period ended March 31, 2004
are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year
ending December 31, 2004. These unaudited consolidated financial statements
should be read in conjunction with the Company's annual audited financial
statements as of December 31, 2003 included in the Company's Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2003 filed with the United States Securities and
Exchange Commission (hereafter referred to as the Company's 2003 Form 10-K). All
of the Company's United States Securities and Exchange Commission filings are
available on the internet at www.sec.gov, under the name Hancock John Life.
The balance sheet at December 31, 2003, presented herein, has been derived from
the audited financial statements at that date but does not include all of the
information and footnotes required by accounting principles generally accepted
in the United States for complete financial statements.
Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current year
presentation.
Recent Acquisition / Disposal Activity
The acquisition described under the table below was recorded under the purchase
method of accounting and, accordingly, the operating results of the acquired
business have been included in the Company's consolidated results of operations
from the date of acquisition. The purchase price was allocated to the assets
acquired and the liabilities assumed based on estimated fair values, with the
excess of the purchase price over the estimated fair values recorded as
goodwill. This acquisition was made by the Company in execution of its plan to
acquire businesses that have strategic value, meet its earnings requirements and
advance the growth of its current businesses.
The disposal described under the table below was conducted in order to execute
the Company's strategy to focus resources on businesses in which it can have a
leadership position. The table below presents actual and proforma data, for
comparative purposes, of revenue and net income for the periods indicated, to
demonstrate the proforma effect of the acquisition and of the disposal as if
they both occurred on January 1, 2003.
Three Months Ended March 31,
2004 2003
Proforma 2004 Proforma 2003
-----------------------------------------------
(in millions)
Revenue .................... $1,736.9 $1,736.9 $1,826.0 $1,857.1
Net income ................. $ 154.3 $ 154.3 $ 270.1 $ 271.0
8
JOHN HANCOCK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (CONTINUED)
Note 1 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies - (Continued)
Acquisition:
On December 31, 2003, the Company acquired the fixed universal life insurance
business of Allmerica Financial Corporation (Allmerica) through a reinsurance
agreement for approximately $104.3 million. There was no impact on the Company's
results of operations from the acquired insurance business during 2002.
Disposal:
On June 19, 2003, the Company agreed to sell its group life insurance business
through a reinsurance agreement with Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, Inc
(MetLife). The Company is ceding all activity after May 1, 2003 to MetLife. The
transaction was recorded as of May 1, 2003 and closed November 4, 2003. There
was no impact on the Company's results of operations from the disposed
operations during the first three months of 2003.
Stock-Based Compensation
For stock option grants made to employees prior to January 1, 2003, the Company
applied the recognition and measurement provisions of Accounting Principles
Board (APB) Opinion No. 25, "Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees," which
resulted in no compensation expense recognized for these stock option grants to
employees. Prior to January 1, 2003 the Company recognized compensation expense
at the time of the grant or over the vesting period for grants of non-vested
stock to employees and non-employee board members and grants of stock options to
non-employee general agents and has continued this practice. All options granted
under those plans had an exercise price equal to the market value of the
Company's common stock on the date of grant. Effective January 1, 2003, the
Company adopted the fair value provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards (SFAS) No. 123, "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation," the effect
of which is to record compensation expense for grants made subsequent to this
date. The following table illustrates the pro forma effect on net income and
earnings per share if the Company had applied the fair value recognition
provisions of SFAS No. 123 to all stock-based employee compensation.
Three Months Ended
March 31,
2004 2003
------------------
(in millions)
Net income, as reported ...................................... $154.3 $271.0
Add: Stock-based employee compensation expense included
in reported net income, net of related tax effects ........ 3.4 0.6
Deduct: Total stock-based employee compensation expense
determined under fair value method for all awards,
net of related tax effects ................................ 5.1 9.3
------ ------
Proforma net income .......................................... $152.6 $262.3
====== ======
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
FASB Interpretation No. 46 (revised December 2003) - Consolidation of Variable
Interest Entities, an Interpretation of ARB No. 51
In December, 2003, the FASB re-issued Interpretation 46, "Consolidation of
Variable Interest Entities, an Interpretation of ARB No. 51," (FIN 46R) which
clarifies the consolidation accounting guidance of Accounting Research Bulletin
No. 51, "Consolidated Financial Statements," (ARB No. 51) to certain entities
for which controlling financial interests are not measurable by reference to
ownership of the equity of the entity. Such entities are known as variable
interest entities (VIEs).
Controlling financial interests of a VIE are defined as exposure of a party to
the VIE to a majority of either the expected variable losses or expected
variable returns of the VIE, or both. Such party is the primary beneficiary of
the VIE and FIN 46R requires that the primary beneficiary of a VIE consolidate
the VIE. FIN 46R also requires certain disclosures for significant relationships
with VIEs, whether or not consolidation accounting is either used or
anticipated. The consolidation requirements of FIN 46R applied at December 31,
2003 for entities considered to be special purpose entities (SPEs), and applied
at March 31, 2004 for non-SPE entities.
9
JOHN HANCOCK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (CONTINUED)
Note 1 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies - (Continued)
The Company categorized its FIN 46R consolidation candidates into three
categories- 1) collateral debt obligation funds it manages (CDO funds or CDOs),
which are SPEs, 2) low-income housing properties (the Properties) which are not
SPEs, and 3) assorted other entities (Other Entities) which are not SPEs. The
Company has determined that it should not consolidate any of the CDO funds,
Properties or Other Entities, therefore the adoption of FIN 46R had no impact on
the Company's consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash
flows.
Additional liabilities recognized as a result of consolidating any VIEs with
which the Company is involved would not represent additional claims on the
general assets of the Company; rather, they would represent claims against
additional assets recognized by the Company as a result of consolidating the
VIEs. Conversely, additional assets recognized as a result of consolidating VIEs
would not represent additional assets which the Company could use to satisfy
claims against its general assets, rather they would be used only to settle
additional liabilities recognized as a result of consolidating the VIEs.
Refer to Note 3--Relationships with Variable Interest Entities for a more
complete discussion of the Company's significant relationships with VIEs, their
assets and liabilities, and the Company's maximum exposure to loss as a result
of its involvement with them.
Statement of Position 03-1 - Accounting and Reporting by Insurance Enterprises
for Certain Nontraditional Long Duration Contracts and for Separate Accounts
On July 7, 2003, the Accounting Standards Executive Committee (AcSEC) of the
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) issued Statement of
Position 03-1, "Accounting and Reporting by Insurance Enterprises for Certain
Nontraditional Long Duration Contracts and for Separate Accounts" (SOP 03-1).
SOP 03-1 provides guidance on a number of topics unique to insurance
enterprises, including separate account presentation, interest in separate
accounts, gains and losses on the transfer of assets from the general account to
a separate account, liability valuation, returns based on a contractually
referenced pool of assets or index, accounting for contracts that contain death
or other insurance benefit features, accounting for reinsurance and other
similar contracts, accounting for annuitization benefits, and sales inducements
to contractholders.
The Company adopted SOP 03-1 on January 1, 2004, which resulted in a decrease in
shareholders' equity of $1.5 million (net of tax of $0.8 million). The Company
recorded a reduction in net income of $3.3 million (net of tax of $1.8 million)
partially offset by an increase in other comprehensive income of $1.8 million
(net of tax of $1.0 million) which were recorded as the cumulative effects of an
accounting change, on January 1, 2004. In addition, in conjunction with the
adoption of SOP 03-1 the Company reclassified $933.8 million in separate account
assets and liabilities to the general account balance sheet accounts.
10
JOHN HANCOCK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (CONTINUED)
Note 2 - Segment Information
The Company operates in the following five business segments: two segments
primarily serve retail customers, two segments serve institutional customers and
our fifth segment is the Corporate and Other Segment, which includes our
international operations, the corporate account and several run-off businesses.
Our retail segments are the Protection Segment and the Asset Gathering Segment.
Our institutional segments are the Guaranteed and Structured Financial Products
Segment (G&SFP) and the Investment Management Segment. For additional
information about the Company's business segments please refer to the Company's
2003 Form 10-K.
The following table summarizes selected financial information by segment for the
periods and dates indicated, and reconcile segment revenues and segment
after-tax operating income to amounts reported in the unaudited consolidated
statements of income. Included in the Protection Segment for all periods
presented are the assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses of the closed
block. For additional information on the closed block, see Note 5 - Closed Block
in the notes to the unaudited consolidated financial statements and the related
footnote in the Company's 2003 Form 10-K.
Amounts reported as segment adjustments in the tables below primarily relate to:
(i) certain net realized investment and other gains (losses), net of
related amortization adjustment for deferred policy acquisition
costs, amounts credited to participating pension contractholder
accounts and policyholder dividend obligation (this adjustment for
net realized investment and other gains (losses) excludes gains and
losses from mortgage securitizations because management views these
gains and losses as an integral part of the core business of those
operations),
(ii) cumulative effect of accounting changes.
11
JOHN HANCOCK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (CONTINUED)
Note 2 - Segment Information - (Continued)
Asset Investment Corporate
Protection Gathering G&SFP Management and Other Consolidated
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(in millions)
As of or for the three months ended
March 31, 2004
Revenues:
Revenues from external
customers ........................... $ 524.3 $ 133.4 $ 15.6 $ 26.2 $ 154.3 $ 853.8
Net investment income ................. 365.3 177.9 401.8 1.6 36.9 983.5
Inter-segment revenues ................ -- 0.3 0.1 4.8 (5.2) --
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Segment revenues ...................... 889.6 311.6 417.5 32.6 186.0 1,837.3
Net realized investment and
other gains (losses), net ........... (1.8) (7.0) (116.6) -- 25.0 (100.4)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Revenues .............................. $ 887.8 $ 304.6 $ 300.9 $ 32.6 $ 211.0 $ 1,736.9
=================================================================================
Net Income:
Segment after-tax operating
income .............................. $ 85.6 $ 38.8 $ 68.8 $ 3.6 $ 25.8 $ 222.6
Net realized investment and
other gains (losses), net ........... (1.5) (4.5) (74.8) -- 15.8 (65.0)
Cumulative effect of accounting
change, net of tax .................. (0.9) (2.7) 0.3 -- -- (3.3)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net income ............................ $ 83.2 $ 31.6 $ (5.7) $ 3.6 $ 41.6 $ 154.3
=================================================================================
Supplemental Information:
Equity in net income of investees
accounted for by the equity method .. $ 8.6 $ 3.0 $ 9.9 $ 0.4 $ 40.8 $ 62.7
Carrying value of investments
accounted for by the equity
method ............................ 441.8 230.5 591.1 40.4 655.4 1,959.2
Amortization of deferred policy
acquisition costs, excluding
amounts related to net realized
investment and other gains
(losses) ............................ 61.4 41.1 0.5 -- (0.1) 102.9
Segment assets ........................ $38,376.0 $18,962.9 $36,520.2 $ 2,260.2 $ 2,532.6 $98,651.9
12
JOHN HANCOCK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (CONTINUED)
Note 2 - Segment Information - (Continued)
Asset Investment Corporate
Protection Gathering G&SFP Management and Other Consolidated
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(in millions)
As of or for the three months ended
March 31, 2003
Revenues:
Revenues from external customers ....... $ 482.9 $ 135.6 $ 18.1 $ 22.0 $ 161.5 $ 820.1
Net investment income .................. 343.6 166.0 427.3 4.2 (8.0) 933.1
Inter-segment revenues ................. -- 0.3 -- 6.4 (6.7) --
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Segment revenues ....................... 826.5 301.9 445.4 32.6 146.8 1,753.2
Net realized investment and other
gains (losses), net .................. (32.0) (37.7) (135.3) -- 308.9 103.9
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Revenues ............................... $ 794.5 $ 264.2 $ 310.1 $ 32.6 $ 455.7 $ 1,857.1
====================================================================================
Net Income:
Segment after-tax operating income ..... $ 83.1 $ 40.0 $ 76.9 $ 5.6 $ (1.8) $ 203.8
Net realized investment and other
gains (losses), net .................. (20.5) (24.1) (85.4) -- 197.2 67.2
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net income ............................. $ 62.6 $ 15.9 $ (8.5) $ 5.6 $ 195.4 $ 271.0
====================================================================================
Supplemental Information:
Equity in net income of investees
accounted for by the equity method ... $ 5.2 $ 2.1 $ 7.9 $ (0.1) $ 0.1 $ 15.2
Carrying amount of investments
accounted for under the equity
method ............................... 256.0 157.7 440.4 11.2 635.8 1,501.1
Amortization of deferred policy
acquisition costs, excluding
amounts related to net realized
investment and other gains (losses) .. 35.2 33.9 0.5 -- 0.2 69.8
Segment assets ......................... $32,910.8 $17,264.4 $35,644.5 $ 2,389.8 $ 2,894.7 $91,104.2
13
JOHN HANCOCK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (CONTINUED)
Note 3 - Relationships with Variable Interest Entities
The Company has relationships with various types of special purpose entities
(SPEs) and other entities, some of which are variable interest entities (VIEs),
in accordance with FIN 46R, as discussed in Note 1--Summary of Significant
Accounting Policies above. Presented below are discussions of the Company's
significant relationships with them, the Company's conclusions about whether the
Company should consolidate them, and certain summarized financial information
for them. As explained in Note 1--Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
above, additional liabilities recognized as a result of consolidating any VIEs
with which the Company is involved would not represent additional claims on the
general assets of the Company; rather, they would represent claims against
additional assets recognized by the Company as a result of consolidating the
VIEs. These additional liabilities would be non-recourse to the general assets
of the Company. Conversely, additional assets recognized as a result of
consolidating these VIEs would not represent additional assets which the Company
could use to satisfy claims against its general assets, rather they would be
used only to settle additional liabilities recognized as a result of
consolidating the VIEs.
Collateralized Debt Obligation Funds (CDOs). Since 1996, the Company has acted
as investment manager to certain asset backed investment vehicles, commonly
known as collateralized debt obligation funds (CDOs). The Company also invests
in the debt and/or equity of these CDOs, and in the debt and/or equity of CDOs
managed by others. CDOs raise capital by issuing debt and equity securities, and
use their capital to invest in portfolios of interest bearing securities. The
returns from a CDO's portfolio of investments are used by the CDO to finance its
operations including paying interest on its debt and paying advisory fees and
other expenses. Any net income or net loss is shared by the CDO's equity owners
and, in certain circumstances where the Company manages the CDO, positive
investment experience is shared by the Company through variable performance
management fees. Any net losses in excess of the CDO equity are borne by the
debt owners in ascending order of subordination. Owners of securities issued by
CDOs that are managed by the Company have no recourse to the Company's assets in
the event of default by the CDO. The Company's risk of loss from any CDO it
manages, or in which it invests, is limited to its investment in the CDO.
In accordance with previous consolidation accounting principles (now superceded
by FIN 46R), the Company formerly consolidated a CDO only if the Company owned a
majority of the CDO's equity. The Company is now required to consolidate a CDO
when, in accordance with FIN 46R, the CDO is deemed to be a VIE, and the Company
is deemed to be the primary beneficiary of the CDO. For those CDOs which are not
deemed to be VIEs, the Company determines its consolidation status by
considering the control relationships among the equity owners of the CDOs. The
Company has determined whether each CDO should be considered a VIE, and while
most are VIEs, some are not. The Company has determined that it is not the
primary beneficiary of any CDO which is a VIE, and for those that are not VIEs,
the Company also does not have controlling financial interests. Therefore, the
Company will not use consolidation accounting for any of the CDOs which it
manages.
The Company believes that its relationships with its managed CDOs are
collectively significant, and accordingly provides, in the tables below, summary
financial data for all these CDOs and data relating to the Company's maximum
exposure to loss as a result of its relationships with them. The Company has
determined that it is not the primary beneficiary of any CDO in which it invests
and does not manage and thus will not be required to consolidate any of them,
and considers that its relationships with them are not collectively significant,
therefore the Company has not disclosed data for them. Credit ratings are
provided by nationally recognized credit rating agencies, and relate to the debt
issued by the CDOs in which the Company has invested.
March 31, December 31,
2004 2003
------------------------
(in millions)
Total size of Company-Managed CDOs
Total assets ................................. $4,891.1 $4,922.2
======== ========
Total debt ................................... $4,188.4 $4,158.2
Total other liabilities ...................... 600.7 712.0
-------- --------
Total liabilities ............................ 4,789.1 4,870.2
Total equity ................................. 102.0 52.0
-------- --------
Total liabilities and equity ................. $4,891.1 $4,922.2
======== ========
14
JOHN HANCOCK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (CONTINUED)
Note 3 - Relationships with Variable Interest Entities - (Continued)
Maximum exposure of the Company to losses March 31, December 31,
From Company-Managed CDOs 2004 2003
-----------------------------------
(in millions, except percentages)
Investment in tranches of Company managed
CDOs, by credit rating (Moody's/Standard
& Poors):
Aaa/AAA ................................. $192.3 34.9% $201.0 35.6%
Aa1/AA+ ................................. 74.8 13.6 75.7 13.4
Baa2/BBB ................................ 217.9 39.6 218.0 38.8
B2 ...................................... 8.2 1.5 8.0 1.4
B3/B- ................................... 12.9 2.3 -- --
Caa1/CCC+ ............................... -- -- 13.2 2.3
Not rated (equity) ...................... 44.8 8.1 48.1 8.5
------ ------ ------ ------
Total Company exposure .................. $550.9 100.0% $564.0 100.0%
====== ====== ====== ======
Low-Income Housing Properties. Since 1995, the Company has generated income tax
benefits by investing in apartment properties (the Properties) that qualify for
low income housing and/or historic tax credits. The Company initially invested
in the Properties directly, but primarily invests indirectly via limited
partnership real estate investment funds (the Funds), which are consolidated
into the Company's financial statements. The Properties are organized as limited
partnerships or limited liability companies each having a managing general
partner or a managing member. The Company is usually the sole limited partner or
investor member in each Property; it is not the general partner or managing
member in any Property.
The Properties typically raise additional capital by qualifying for long-term
debt, which at times is guaranteed or otherwise subsidized by Federal or state
agencies, or by Fannie Mae. In certain cases, the Company invests in the
mortgages of the Properties. The Company's maximum loss in relation to the
Properties is limited to its equity investment in the Properties, future equity
commitments made, and where the Company is the mortgagor, the outstanding
balance of the mortgages originated for the Properties, and outstanding mortgage
commitments the Company has made to the Properties. The Company receives Federal
income tax credits in recognition of its investment in each of the Properties
for a period of ten years and in some cases, the Company receives distributions
from the Properties which are based on a portion of the Property cash flows.
The Company has determined that it is not the primary beneficiary of any
Property, so the Company will not use consolidation accounting for any of them.
The Company believes that its relationships with the Properties are significant,
and accordingly, the disclosures in the tables below are provided. The tables
below present summary financial data for the Properties, and data relating to
the Company's maximum exposure to loss as a result of its relationships with
them.
March 31, December 31,
2004 2003
------------------------
(in millions)
Total size of the Properties (1)
Total assets ..................................... $982.7 $982.7
====== ======
Total debt ....................................... 576.3 576.3
Total other liabilities .......................... 116.6 116.6
------ ------
Total liabilities ................................ 692.9 692.9
Total equity ..................................... 289.8 289.8
------ ------
Total liabilities and equity ..................... $982.7 $982.7
====== ======
(1) Property level data reported above is reported with six and three month
delays, respectively, due to the delayed availability of financial statements of
the Funds.
15
JOHN HANCOCK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (CONTINUED)
Note 3 - Relationships with Variable Interest Entities - (Continued)
March 31, December 31,
2004 2003
-------------------------
(in millions)
Maximum exposure of the Company to losses from the Properties
Equity investment in the Properties (1) ...................... $291.0 $291.0
Outstanding equity capital commitments to the Properties ..... 97.7 108.2
Carrying value of mortgages for the Properties ............... 65.0 62.8
Outstanding mortgage commitments to the Properties ........... 2.7 5.1
------ ------
Total Company exposure ....................................... $456.4 $467.1
====== ======
(1) Equity investment in the Properties above is reported with six and three
month delays, respectively, due to the delayed availability of financial
statements of the Funds.
Other Entities. The Company has investment relationships with a disparate group
of entities (Other Entities), which result from the Company's direct investment
in their debt and/or equity. This category includes energy investment
partnerships, investment funds organized as limited partnerships, and businesses
which have undergone debt restructurings and reorganizations and other. The
Company has determined that for each of these Other Entities which are VIEs, the
Company is not the primary beneficiary, and should not use consolidation
accounting for them. The Company believes that its relationships with the Other
Entities are not significant, and is accordingly no longer providing summary
financial data for them, or data relating to the Company's maximum exposure to
loss as a result of its relationships with them. These potential losses are
generally limited to amounts invested and are included in the Company's
consolidated balance sheets in appropriate investment categories.
16
JOHN HANCOCK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (CONTINUED)
Note 4 - Commitments and Contingencies
Reinsurance Recoverable
On February 28, 1997, the Company sold a major portion of its group insurance
business to UNICARE Life & Health Insurance Company (UNICARE), a wholly owned
subsidiary of WellPoint Health Networks, Inc. The business sold included the
Company's group accident and health business and related group life business and
Cost Care, Inc., Hancock Association Services Group and Tri-State, Inc., all of
which were indirect wholly-owned subsidiaries of the Company. The Company
retained its group long-term care operations. The insurance business sold was
transferred to UNICARE through a 100% coinsurance agreement. The Company remains
liable to its policyholders to the extent that UNICARE does not meet its
contractual obligations under the coinsurance agreement.
Through the Company's group health insurance operations, the Company entered
into a number of reinsurance arrangements in respect of personal accident
insurance and the occupational accident component of workers compensation
insurance, a portion of which was originated through a pool managed by Unicover
Managers, Inc. Under these arrangements, the Company both assumed risks as a
reinsurer, and also passed 95% of these risks on to other companies. This
business had originally been reinsured by a number of different companies, and
has become the subject of widespread disputes. The disputes concern the
placement of the business with reinsurers and recovery of the reinsurance. The
Company is engaged in certain disputes, including a number of related legal
proceedings, in respect of this business. The risk to the Company is that other
companies that reinsured the business from the Company may seek to avoid their
reinsurance obligations. However, the Company believes that it has a reasonable
legal position in this matter. During the fourth quarter of 1999 and early 2000,
the Company received additional information about its exposure to losses under
the various reinsurance programs. As a result of this additional information and
in connection with global settlement discussions initiated in late 1999 with
other parties involved in the reinsurance programs, during the fourth quarter of
1999 the Company recognized a charge for uncollectible reinsurance of $133.7
million, after tax, as its best estimate of its remaining loss exposure. The
Company believes that any exposure to loss from this issue, in addition to
amounts already provided for as of March 31, 2004, would not be material to the
Company's financial position, results of operation or liquidity.
Reinsurance ceded contracts do not relieve the Company from its obligations to
policyholders. The Company remains liable to its policyholders for the portion
reinsured to the extent that any reinsurer does not meet its obligations for
reinsurance ceded to it under the reinsurance agreements. Failure of the
reinsurers to honor their obligations could result in losses to the Company;
consequently, estimates are established for amounts deemed or estimated to be
uncollectible. To minimize its exposure to significant losses from reinsurance
insolvencies, the Company evaluates the financial condition of its reinsurers
and monitors concentration of credit risk arising from similar characteristics
of the reinsurers.
Other Matters
In the normal course of its business operations, the Company is involved with
litigation from time to time with claimants, beneficiaries and others, and a
number of litigation matters were pending as of March 31, 2004. It is the
opinion of management, after consultation with counsel, that the ultimate
liability with respect to these claims, if any, will not materially affect the
financial position, results of operations or liquidity of the Company.
17
JOHN HANCOCK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (CONTINUED)
Note 5 - Closed Block
In connection with the Company's plan of reorganization for its demutualization
and initial public offering, the Company created a closed block for the benefit
of policies included therein. Additional information regarding the creation of
the closed block and relevant accounting issues is contained in the notes to
consolidated financial statements of the Company's 2003 Form 10-K. The following
tables set forth certain summarized financial information relating to the closed
block as of the dates indicated.
March 31, December 31,
2004 2003
----------------------------
(in millions)
Liabilities
Future policy benefits ................................................. $10,703.6 $10,690.6
Policyholder dividend obligation ....................................... 524.8 400.0
Policyholders' funds ................................................... 1,510.9 1,511.9
Policyholder dividends payable ......................................... 413.5 413.1
Other closed block liabilities ......................................... 109.6 37.4
----------------------------
Total closed block liabilities ...................................... $13,262.4 $13,053.0
----------------------------
Assets
Investments:
Fixed maturities:
Held-to-maturity--at amortized cost
(fair value: March 31--$61.2; December 31--$69.6) ................. $ 61.2 $ 66.0
Available-for-sale--at fair value
(cost: March 31--$6,014.4; December 31--$5,847.6) ................. 6,554.7 6,271.1
Equity securities:
Available-for-sale--at fair value
(cost: March 31--$8.7 December 31--$9.1) .......................... 8.9 9.1
Mortgage loans on real estate .......................................... 1,556.3 1,577.9
Policy loans ........................................................... 1,549.7 1,554.0
Short term investments ................................................. -- 1.2
Other invested assets .................................................. 296.4 230.6
----------------------------
Total investments ................................................... 10,027.2 9,709.9
Cash and cash equivalents .............................................. 162.9 248.3
Accrued investment income .............................................. 148.3 145.1
Other closed block assets .............................................. 306.0 308.6
----------------------------
Total closed block assets ........................................... $10,644.4 $10,411.9
----------------------------
Excess of reported closed block liabilities over assets
designated to the closed block ...................................... $ 2,618.0 $ 2,641.1
----------------------------
Portion of above representing other comprehensive income:
Unrealized appreciation (depreciation), net of tax of ($189.0)
million and ($148.0) million at March 31 and December 31,
respectively ...................................................... 351.1 275.3
Allocated to the policyholder dividend obligation, net of tax of
$188.0 million and $148.1 million at March 31 and December 31,
respectively ...................................................... (349.1) (275.1)
----------------------------
Total ........................................................... 2.0 0.2
----------------------------
Maximum future earnings to be recognized from closed block
assets and liabilities .............................................. $ 2,620.0 $ 2,641.3
============================
18
JOHN HANCOCK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (CONTINUED)
Note 5 - Closed Block - (Continued)
March 31, December 31,
2004 2003
---------------------------
(in millions)
Changes in the policyholder dividend obligation:
Balance at beginning of period ................... $400.0 $288.9
Impact on net income before income taxes ....... 10.9 (57.9)
Unrealized investment gains (losses) ........... 113.9 169.0
---------------------------
Balance at end of period ......................... $524.8 $400.0
===========================
The following table sets forth certain summarized financial information relating
to the closed block for the periods indicated:
Three Months Ended March 31,
2004 2003
-------------------------------
(in millions)
Revenues
Premiums ................................................................ $209.3 $224.4
Net investment income ................................................... 157.9 164.6
Net realized investment and other gains (losses), net of amounts
credited to the policyholder dividend obligation of $14.9
million and $(35.0) million, respectively ............................. (1.1) (1.2)
Other closed block revenues ............................................. (0.3) --
-------------------------------
Total closed block revenues ........................................... 365.8 387.8
Benefits and Expenses
Benefits to policyholders ............................................... 232.0 245.6
Change in the policyholder dividend obligation .......................... (4.6) (5.5)
Other closed block operating costs and expenses ......................... 1.4 (2.5)
Dividends to policyholders .............................................. 104.8 117.0
-------------------------------
Total benefits and expenses ........................................... 333.6 354.6
-------------------------------
Closed block revenues, net of closed block benefits and expenses
and before income taxes ............................................... 32.2 33.2
Income taxes, net of amounts credited to the policyholder
dividend obligation of $0.6 million and $0.5 million, respectively .... 11.2 11.4
-------------------------------
Closed block revenues, net of closed block benefits and expenses
and income taxes ................................................... $ 21.0 $ 21.8
===============================
Note 6 - Severance
During the three month period ended March 31, 2004, the Company continued its
ongoing Competitive Position Project (the project). This project was initiated
in the first quarter of 1999 to reduce costs and increase future operating
efficiency by consolidating portions of the Company's operations and continued
through the first quarter of 2004. The project consists primarily of reducing
staff in the home office and terminating certain operations outside the home
office.
Since the inception of the project as well as from similar initiatives such as
our information technology outsourcing and the sale of the home office
properties, approximately 1,530 employees have been terminated. Benefits paid
since the inception of the project were $110.4 million through March 31, 2004.
As of March 31, 2004 and December 31, 2003, the liability for employee
termination costs, included in other liabilities was $9.0 million and $12.0
million, respectively. Employee termination costs, net of related pension
curtailment and other post employment benefit related gains, are included in
other operating costs and expenses and were $(0.8) million and $6.2 million for
the three months ended March 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively. The total employee
termination costs for the three month period ended March 31, 2003 consisted of
an estimated $6.2 million for planned terminations related to our information
technology outsourcing.
19
JOHN HANCOCK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (CONTINUED)
Note 7 - Related Party Transactions
Certain directors of the Company are members or directors of other entities that
periodically perform services for or have other transactions with the Company.
Such transactions are either subject to bidding procedures or are otherwise
entered into on terms comparable to those that would be available to unrelated
third parties and are not material to the Company's results of operations,
financial condition, or liquidity.
The Company provides JHFS, its parent, with personnel, property, and facilities
in carrying out certain of its corporate functions. The Company annually
determines a fee (the parent company service fee) for these services and
facilities based on a number of criteria, which are periodically revised to
reflect continuing changes in the Company's operations. The parent company
service fee is included in other operating costs and expenses within the
Company's income statements. The Company charged JHFS service fees of $5.2
million and $6.3 million for the three month periods ended March 31, 2004 and
2003, respectively. As of March 31, 2004, JHFS was current in its payments to
the Company related to these services.
The Company provides certain administrative and asset management services to its
employee benefit plans (the Plans). Fees paid to the Company by the Plans for
these services were $1.6 million and $1.4 million for the three month periods
ended March 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively.
During the three month periods ended March 31, 2004 and 2003, the Company paid
$19.0 million and $24.8 million in premiums to an affiliate, John Hancock
Insurance Company of Vermont (JHIC of Vermont) for certain insurance services.
All of these were in Trust Owned Health Insurance (TOHI) premiums, a funding
vehicle for postretirement medical benefit plans, which offers customers an
insured medical benefit-funding program in conjunction with a broad range of
investment options.
The Company has reinsured certain portions of its long term care insurance,
non-traditional life insurance and group pension businesses with John Hancock
Reassurance Company, Ltd. of Bermuda (JHReCo), an affiliate and a wholly owned
subsidiary of JHFS. The Company entered into these reinsurance contracts in
order to facilitate its capital management process. These reinsurance contracts
are primarily written on a funds withheld basis where the related financial
assets remain invested at the Company. As a result, the Company recorded a
liability for coinsurance amounts withheld from JHReCo of $1,515.6 million at
March 31, 2004 and $994.5 million at December 31, 2003, which are included with
other liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets and recorded reinsurance
recoverable from JHReCo of $1,107.5 million at March 31, 2004 and $1,421.1
million at December 31, 2003, respectively, which are included with other
reinsurance recoverables on the consolidated balance sheets. Premiums ceded to
JHReCo were $195.4 million and $117.3 million for the three month periods ended
March 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively.
During the year ended 2002, the Company began reinsuring certain portions of its
group pension businesses with JHIC of Vermont. The Company entered into these
reinsurance contracts in order to facilitate its capital management process.
These reinsurance contracts are primarily written on a funds withheld basis
where the related financial assets remain invested at the Company. As a result,
the Company recorded a liability for coinsurance amounts withheld from JHIC of
Vermont of $186.5 million at March 31, 2004 and $157.2 million at December 31,
2003, which is included with other liabilities in the consolidated balance
sheets. At March 31, 2004 and December 31, 2003, the Company had not recorded
any reinsurance recoverable from JHIC of Vermont. Reinsurance recoverable is
typically recorded with other reinsurance recoverables on the consolidated
balance sheet. Premiums ceded by the Company to JHIC of Vermont were $0.3
million and $0.2 million for the three month periods ended March 31, 2004 and
2003, respectively.
20
JOHN HANCOCK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (CONTINUED)
Note 8 - Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
The carrying values of the Company's goodwill and other purchased intangible
assets are presented in the table below as of the dates presented. These assets
are included in other assets in the unaudited consolidated balance sheets.
Additional information about the Company's purchased intangible assets is
provided in the Notes to the Company's 2003 Form 10-K.
March 31, December 31,
2004 2003
----------------------------
(in millions)
Goodwill .................................... $108.6 $108.6
Management contracts ........................ 6.2 6.3
Value of business acquired .................. 162.3 168.5
Note 9 - Pension and Other Postretirement Benefit Plans
The following table demonstrates the components of the Company's net periodic
benefit cost for the periods indicated:
Net Periodic Benefit Cost Three Months Ended March 31,
2004 2003 2004 2003
--------------------------------------------------
Other
Postretirement
Pension Benefits Benefits
--------------------------------------------------
(in millions)
Service cost .............................. $ 5.6 $ 6.5 $ 0.4 $ 0.4
Interest cost ............................. 32.4 32.7 9.2 8.8
Expected return on plan assets ............ (44.1) (39.0) (5.2) (4.4)
Amortization of prior service cost ........ 1.7 1.9 (1.9) (1.6)
Recognized actuarial gain ................. 6.2 7.5 3.1 1.7
------------------ -------------------
Net periodic benefit cost ................. $ 1.8 $ 9.6 $ 5.6 $ 4.9
================== ===================
Employer Contributions
The Company previously disclosed in its financial statements for the year ended
December 31, 2003, that it expected to contribute approximately $2 million to
its qualified pension plan in 2004 and approximately $25 million to its
non-qualified pension plans in 2004. As of March 31, 2004, no contributions have
been made to the qualified plans, and the Company still anticipates contributing
approximately $2 million for the year ended December 31, 2004. As of March 31,
2004, $11.4 million of the contributions have been made to the non-qualified
plans, and the Company anticipates contributing another $13.6 million to reach a
total of $25.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2004.
The Company's policy is to fund its other post retirement benefits in amounts at
or below the annual tax qualified limits. As of March 31, 2004, $12.5 million
was contributed to its other post retirement benefit plans. The Company expects
to contribute approximately $50 million to its other post retirement benefit
plans in 2004.
On December 8, 2003, President Bush signed into law a bill that expands
Medicare, primarily by adding a prescription drug benefit for Medicare-eligible
retirees starting in 2006. The company anticipates that the benefits it pays
after 2006 will be lower as a result of the new Medicare provisions; however,
the retiree medical obligations and costs reported do not reflect the impact of
this legislation. Deferring the recognition of the new Medicare provisions'
impact is permitted by Financial Accounting Standards Board Staff Position 106-1
due to open questions about some of the new Medicare provisions and a lack of
authoritative accounting guidance about certain matters. The final accounting
guidance could require changes to previously reported information.
21
JOHN HANCOCK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (CONTINUED)
Note 10 - Certain Separate Accounts
The Company issues variable annuity contracts through its separate accounts for
which investment income and investment gains and losses accrue directly to, and
investment risk is borne by, the contract holder (traditional variable
annuities). The Company also issues variable life insurance and variable annuity
contracts which contain certain guarantees (variable contracts with guarantees)
which are discussed more fully below.
During 2004 and 2003, there were no gains or losses on transfers of assets from
the general account to the separate account. The assets supporting the variable
portion of both traditional variable annuities and variable contracts with
guarantees are carried at fair value and reported as summary total separate
account assets with an equivalent summary total reported for liabilities.
Amounts assessed against the contractholders for mortality, administrative, and
other services are included in revenue and changes in liabilities for minimum
guarantees are included in policyholder benefits in the Statement of Operations.
Separate account net investment income, net investment gains and losses, and the
related liability changes are offset within the same line item in the Statement
of Operations.
The deposits related to the variable life insurance contracts are invested in
separate accounts and the company guarantees a specified death benefit if
certain specified premiums are paid by the policyholder, regardless of separate
account performance.
At March 31, 2004 and December 31, 2003, the Company had the following variable
life contracts with guarantees. For guarantees of amounts in the event of death,
the net amount at risk is defined as the excess of the initial sum insured over
the current sum insured for fixed premium variable life contracts, and, for
other variable life contracts, is equal to the sum insured when the account
value is zero and the policy is still in force.
March 31, December 31,
2004 2003
----------------------------
(in millions, except for age)
Life contracts with guaranteed benefits
In the event of death
Account values ................................ $6,480.1 $6,249.4
Net amount at risk related to deposits ........ $101.6 $106.2
Average attained age of contractholders ....... 46 46
The variable annuity contracts are issued through separate accounts and the
company contractually guarantees to the contract holder either (a) return of at
least no less than total deposits made to the contract less any partial
withdrawals, (b) total deposits made to the contract less any partial
withdrawals plus a minimum return, (c) the highest contract value on a specified
anniversary date minus any withdrawals following the contract anniversary or (d)
a combination benefit of (b) and (c) above. Most business issued after May 2003
has a proportional partial withdrawal benefit instead of a dollar-for-dollar
relationship. These variable annuity contract guarantees include benefits that
are payable in the event of death or annuitization, or at specified dates during
the accumulation period.
At March 31, 2004 and December 31, 2003, the Company had the following variable
contracts with guarantees. (Note that the company's variable annuity contracts
with guarantees may offer more than one type of guarantee in each contract;
therefore, the amounts listed are not mutually exclusive.) For guarantees of
amounts in the event of death, the net amount at risk is defined as the current
guaranteed minimum death benefit in excess of the current account balance at the
balance sheet date. For guarantees of amounts at annuitization, the net amount
at risk is defined as the present value of the minimum guaranteed annuity
payments available to the contract holder determined in accordance with the
terms of the contract in excess of the current account balance. For guarantees
of accumulation balances, the net amount at risk is defined as the guaranteed
minimum accumulation balance minus the current account balance.
22
JOHN HANCOCK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (CONTINUED)
Note 10 - Certain Separate Accounts - (Continued)
March 31, December 31,
2004 2003
-----------------------------
(in millions, except for age
and percents)
Return of net deposits
In the event of death
Account value ......................................................... $3,392.5 $3,406.4
Net amount at risk .................................................... $ 136.8 $ 153.8
Average attained age of contractholders ............................... 61 61
Return of net deposits plus a minimum return
In the event of death
Account value ......................................................... $1,034.2 $1,051.7
Net amount at risk .................................................... $ 221.6 $ 230.7
Average attained age of contractholders ............................... 63 63
Range of guaranteed minimum return rates .............................. 5% 5%
At annuitization
Account value ......................................................... $ 171.5 $ 169.4
Net amount at risk .................................................... -- --
Average attained age of contractholders ............................... 57 57
Range of guaranteed minimum return rates .............................. 4-5% 4-5%
Highest specified anniversary account value minus withdrawals post anniversary
In the event of death
Account value ......................................................... $1,228.6 $1,224.7
Net amount at risk .................................................... $ 196.1 $ 214.0
Average attained age of contractholders ............................... 58 58
Account balances of variable contracts with guarantees were invested in variable
separate accounts in 465 separate mutual funds at March 31, 2004 which included
foreign and domestic equities and bond as shown below:
March 31, December 31,
2004 2003
------------------------------------------------------
Number of Number of
Type of Fund Funds Amount funds Amount
- ------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------
(in millions, except for number of funds)
Domestic Equity - Growth Funds ............ 196 $ 2,885.6 173 $ 2,813.4
Domestic Bond Funds ....................... 68 2,381.1 62 2,423.5
Domestic Equity - Growth & Income Funds ... 13 2,373.7 12 2,341.2
Balanced Investment Funds ................. 10 2,219.1 10 2,167.4
Domestic Equity - Value Funds ............. 71 946.9 66 865.0
International Equity Funds ................ 90 674.7 84 621.1
International Bond Funds .................. 12 111.8 11 107.3
Hedge Funds ............................... 5 24.4 4 22.7
------------------------ ------------------------
Total .................................... 465 $11,617.3 422 $11,361.6
======================== ========================
23
JOHN HANCOCK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (CONTINUED)
Note 10 - Certain Separate Accounts - (Continued)
The following summarizes the liabilities for guarantees on variable contracts
reflected in the general account:
Guaranteed Guaranteed
Minimum Minimum
Death Income
Benefit Benefit
(GMDB) (GMIB) Totals
-----------------------------------------
(in millions)
Balance at January 1, 2004 ................... $30.8 $ 1.0 $31.8
Incurred guarantee benefits .................. 0.8 0.2 1.0
Paid guarantee benefits ...................... (1.9) -- (1.9)
---------------------- -----
Balance at March 31, 2004 .................... $29.7 $ 1.2 $30.9
====================== =====
The GMDB liability is determined each period end by estimating the expected
value of death benefits in excess of the projected account balance and
recognizing the excess ratably over the accumulation period based on total
expected assessments. The Company regularly evaluates estimates used and adjusts
the additional liability balance, with a related charge or credit to benefit
expense, if actual experience or other evidence suggests that earlier
assumptions should be revised. The following assumptions and methodology were
used to determine the GMDB liability at March 31, 2004.
* Data used included 1000 and 200 (for life and annuity contracts,
respectively) stochastically generated investment performance
scenarios.
* Volatility assumptions depended on mix of investments by contract
type and were 19% for annuity and 13.8% for life products.
* Life products used mortality, lapse, mean investment performance,
and discount rate assumptions included in the related deferred
acquisition cost (DAC) models which varied by issue year and product
* Mean investment performance assumptions for annuity contracts were
13% for 5 years followed by 8%
* Annuity mortality was assumed to be 100 percent of the Annuity 2000
table.
* Annuity lapse rates vary by contract type and duration and range
from 1 percent to 20 percent, with an average of approximately 15
percent.
* Annuity discount rate was 7.52%.
The guaranteed minimum income benefit (GMIB) liability is determined each period
end by estimating the expected value of the annuitization benefits in excess of
the projected account balance at the date of annuitization and recognizing the
excess ratably over the accumulation period based on total expected assessments.
The Company regularly evaluates estimates used and adjusts the additional
liability balance, with a related charge or credit to benefit expense, if actual
experience or other evidence suggests that earlier assumptions should be
revised.
Note 11 - Subsequent Events
Refer to Business section of Note 1 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
for a description of the completion of the merger with Manulife as of April 28,
2004.
In early April 2004, the Company received notice of a settlement arising out of
bankruptcy proceedings of Enron Corporation. The Company recorded the proceeds
of Enron settlements against previously impaired investments in Enron securities
resulting in a net realized investment and other gain of approximately $26.5
million, pre-tax, consisting of $9.0 million in cash and an unsecured claim
against Enron Corporation of $201.7 million, which is valued at $17.5 million.
In April 2004, the Company received notification from the Massachusetts Turnpike
Authority of approval of the assignment of the Company's parking garage air
rights lease to Beacon Capital. Approval of the transfer of this lease allowed
the Company to recognize a $74.0 million realized gain in April 2004 which had
previously been deferred.
24
JOHN HANCOCK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION and ANALYSIS of FINANCIAL CONDITION and RESULTS
of OPERATIONS
Management's discussion and analysis of financial conditions and results
of operations is presented in a condensed disclosure format pursuant to General
Instruction H(1)(a) and (b) of Form 10-Q. The management narrative for eh
Company that follows should be read in conjunction with the unaudited interim
financial statements and related footnotes to the unaudited interim condensed
financial statements included elsewhere herein, and with the Management's
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations section
included in the Company's 2003 Annual Report on Form 10-K. All of the Company's
United States Securities and Exchange Commission filings are available on the
internet at www.sec.gov, under the name Hancock John Life.
Statements, analyses, and other information contained in this report
relating to trends in the Company's operations and financial results, the
markets for the Company's products, the future development of the Company's
business, and the contingencies and uncertainties to which the Company may be
subject, as well as other statements including words such as "anticipate,"
"believe," "plan," "estimate," "intend," "will," "should," "may," and other
similar expressions, are "forward-looking statements" under the Private
Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such statements are made based upon
management's current expectations and beliefs concerning future events and their
potential effects on the Company. Future events and their effects on the Company
may not be these anticipated by management. The Company's actual results may
differ materially from the results anticipated in these forward-looking
statements. See "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations - Forward-Looking Statements" included herein for a
discussion of factors that could cause or contribute to such material
differences.
Merger with Manulife Financial Corporation
On April 28, 2004, JHFS, the parent of the Company, completed its merger
agreement with Manulife Financial Corporation (Manulife) and as of the close of
business JHFS common stock stopped trading on the New York Stock Exchange. In
accordance with the agreement, each share of JHFS common stock was converted
into 1.1853 shares of Manulife stock. Commencing on April 28, 2004, the Company
now operates as a subsidiary of Manulife and the John Hancock name is Manulife's
primary U.S. brand.
Critical Accounting Policies
General
We have identified the accounting policies below as critical to our
business operations and understanding of our results of operations. For a
detailed discussion of the application of these and other accounting policies,
see Note 1--Summary of Significant Accounting Policies in the notes to
consolidated financial statements in the Company's 2003 Form 10-K. Note that the
application of these accounting policies in the preparation of this report
requires management to use judgments involving assumptions and estimates
concerning future results or other developments including the likelihood, timing
or amount of one or more future transactions or events. There can be no
assurance that actual results will not differ from those estimates. These
judgments are reviewed frequently by senior management, and an understanding of
them may enhance the reader's understanding of the Company's financial
statements. We have discussed the identification, selection and disclosure of
critical accounting estimates and policies with the Audit Committee of the Board
of Directors.
Purchase Accounting (PGAAP)
In accordance with SFAS No. 141, "Business Combinations" the merger
transaction will be accounted for as a purchase of John Hancock by Manulife. The
purchase method requires that the acquired company adjust the cost basis of its
assets and liabilities to fair value on the acquisition date (the purchase
adjustments).
The determination of the purchase adjustments relating to investments will
reflect management's reliance on independent price quotes where available. Other
purchase adjustments will require significant management estimates and
assumptions. The purchase adjustments relating to intangible assets, including
brand name and VOBA, and liabilities, including policyholder reserves, will
require management to exercise significant judgment to assess the value of these
items.
The Company's purchase adjustments will result in a revalued balance sheet
which may result in future earnings trends which differ significantly from
historical trends. The Company does not anticipate any impact on its liquidity,
or ability to pay claims of policyholders, arising out of the purchase
accounting process related to the merger.
25
JOHN HANCOCK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Consolidation Accounting
In December 2003, the Financial Accounting Standards Board re-issued
Interpretation 46, "Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities, an
Interpretation of ARB No. 51," (FIN 46R) which clarifies the consolidation
accounting guidance of Accounting Research Bulletin No. 51, "Consolidated
Financial Statements," (ARB No. 51) to certain entities for which controlling
interests are not measurable by reference to ownership in the equity of the
entity. Such entities are known as variable interest entities (VIEs).
The Company has finalized its FIN 46R analysis for all of the entities
described below. The Company is not the primary beneficiary of any of them. For
many of these, the application of FIN 46R required estimation by the Company of
the future periodic cash flows and changes in fair values for each candidate,
starting as of the Company's original commitment to invest in and/or manage each
candidate, and extending out to the end of the full expected life of each. These
cash flows and fair values were then analyzed for variability, and this expected
variability was quantified and compared to total historical amounts invested in
each candidate's equity to help determine if each candidate is a VIE. The
Company also evaluated quantitative and non-quantitative aspects of control
relationships among the owners and decision makers of each candidate to help
determine if they are VIEs.
For each candidate determined to be a VIE, the expected variable losses
and returns were then theoretically allocated out to the various investors and
other participants in each candidate, in order to determine if any party had
exposure to the majority of the expected variable losses or returns, in which
case that party is the primary beneficiary of the VIE. The Company used
significant levels of judgment while performing these quantitative and
qualitative assessments. The paragraphs below describe the Company's
relationships with, and the general nature of each major category of entity
analyzed by the Company under FIN 46R.
The Investment Management Segment of the Company manages invested assets
for its customers under various fee-based arrangements using a variety of
entities to hold these assets under management, and since 1996, this has
included investment vehicles commonly known as collateralized debt obligations
funds (CDOs). Various business units of the Company sometimes invest in the debt
or equity securities issued by these and other CDOs to support their insurance
liabilities.
Since 1995, the Company generates income tax benefits by investing in
apartment properties (the Properties) that qualify for low income housing and/or
historic tax credits. The Company invests in the Properties directly, but
primarily invests indirectly via limited partnership real estate investment
funds (The Funds). The Funds are consolidated into the Company's financial
statements. The Properties are organized as limited partnerships or limited
liability companies each having a managing general partner or a managing member.
The Company is usually the sole limited partner or investor member in each
Property; it is not the general partner or managing member in any Property. The
Properties typically raise additional capital by qualifying for long-term debt,
which at times is guaranteed or otherwise subsidized by Federal or state
agencies or Fannie Mae. In certain cases, the Company invests in the mortgages
of the Properties.
The Company has a number of relationships with a disparate group of
entities (Other Entities), which result from the Company's direct investment in
their equity and/or debt. This group includes energy investment partnerships,
investment funds organized as limited partnerships, and manufacturing companies
in whose debt the Company invests, and which subsequently underwent corporate
reorganizations.
Additional liabilities recognized as a result of consolidating any of
these entities would not represent additional claims on the general assets of
the Company; rather, they would represent claims against additional assets
recognized by the Company as a result of these consolidations. Conversely,
additional assets recognized as a result of these consolidations would not
represent additional assets which the Company could use to satisfy claims
against its general assets, rather they would be used only to settle additional
liabilities recognized as a result of these consolidations.
The Company's maximum exposure to loss in relation to these entities is
limited to its investments in them, future debt and equity commitments made to
them, and where the Company is the mortgagor to the Properties, the outstanding
balance of the mortgages originated for them, and outstanding mortgage
commitments made to them. Therefore, the Company believes that the application
of FIN 46R will have no impact on the Company's liquidity and capital resources
beyond what is already presented in the consolidated financial statements and
notes thereto.
The Company discloses summary financial data and its maximum exposure to
losses for the CDOs and Properties in Note 3 - Relationships with Variable
Interest Entities in the notes to consolidated financial statements, but does
26
JOHN HANCOCK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
not do so anymore for the Other Entities because of the small size and disparate
nature of the group and because the Company does not believe these relationships
are collectively significant.
Amortization of Deferred Acquisition Costs (DAC) and Value of Business
Added (VOBA) Assets
Costs that vary with, and are related primarily to the production of new
business are deferred to the extent that they are deemed recoverable. Such costs
include commissions, certain costs of policy issue and underwriting, and certain
agency expenses. Similarly, any amounts assessed as initiation fees or front-end
loads are recorded as unearned revenue. The Company has also recorded intangible
assets representing the present value of estimated future profits of insurance
policies inforce related to business acquired. The Company tests the
recoverability of its DAC and VOBA assets quarterly with a model that uses data
such as market performance, lapse rates and expense levels. We amortize DAC and
VOBA on term life and long-term care insurance ratably with premiums. We
amortize DAC and VOBA on our annuity products and retail life insurance, other
than term life insurance policies, based on a percentage of the estimated gross
profits over the life of the policies, which are generally twenty years for
annuities and thirty years for life policies. Our estimated gross profits are
computed based on assumptions related to the underlying policies including
mortality, lapse, expenses, and asset growth rates. We amortize DAC, VOBA and
unearned revenue on these policies such that the percentage of gross profits to
the amount of DAC, VOBA and unearned revenue amortized is constant over the life
of the policies.
Estimated gross profits, including net realized investment and other gains
(losses), are adjusted periodically to take into consideration the actual
experience to date and assumed changes in the remaining gross profits. When
estimated gross profits are adjusted, we also adjust the amortization of DAC and
VOBA to maintain a constant amortization percentage over the life of the
policies. Our current estimated gross profits include certain judgments by our
actuaries concerning mortality, lapse and asset growth that are based on a
combination of actual Company experience and historical market experience of
equity and fixed income returns. Short-term variances of actual results from the
judgments made by management can impact quarter to quarter earnings. Our history
has shown us that the actual results over time for mortality, lapse and the
combination of investment returns and crediting rates (referred in the industry
as interest spread) for the life insurance and annuity products have reasonably
followed the long-term historical trends. As actual results for market
experience, or asset growth, fluctuate significantly from historical trends and
the long-term assumptions made in calculating expected gross profits, management
changes these assumptions periodically as necessary.
Benefits to Policyholders
The liability for future policy benefits is the largest liability included
in our consolidated balance sheets, equal to $39,503.7 million, or 43.7% of
total liabilities as of March 31, 2004. Changes in this liability are generally
reflected in the benefits to policyholders in our consolidated statements of
income. This liability is primarily comprised of the present value of estimated
future payments to holders of life insurance and annuity products based on
certain management judgments. Reserves for future policy benefits of certain
insurance products are calculated using management's judgments of mortality,
morbidity, lapse, investment performance and expense levels that are based
primarily on the Company's past experience and are therefore reflective of the
Company's proven underwriting and investing abilities. Once these assumptions
are made for a given policy or group of policies, they will not be changed over
the life of the policy unless the Company recognizes a loss on the entire line
of business. The Company periodically reviews its policies for loss recognition
and, based on management's judgment, the Company from time to time may recognize
a loss on certain lines of business. Short-term variances of actual results from
the judgments made by management are reflected in current period earnings and
can impact quarter to quarter earnings.
Investment in Debt and Equity Securities
Impairments on our investment portfolio are recorded as a charge to income
in the period when the impairment is judged by management to occur. See the
General Account Investments section of this document for a more detailed
discussion of the investment officers' professional judgments involved in
determining impairments and fair values.
Certain of our fixed income securities classified as held-to-maturity and
available-for-sale are not publicly traded, and quoted market prices are not
available from brokers or investment bankers on these securities. The change in
the fair value of the available-for-sale securities is recorded in other
comprehensive income as an unrealized gain or loss. We calculate the fair value
of these securities ourselves through the use of pricing models and discounted
cash flows calling for a substantial level of professional investment management
judgments. Our approach is based on currently available information, including
information obtained by reviewing similarly traded securities in the market, and
we believe it to be appropriate and fundamentally sound. However, different
pricing models or assumptions or changes in relevant current information could
27
JOHN HANCOCK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
produce different valuation results. The Company's pricing model takes into
account a number of factors based on current market conditions and trading
levels of similar securities. These include current market based factors related
to credit quality, country of issue, market sector and average investment life.
The resulting prices are then reviewed by the pricing analysts and members of
the Controller's Department. Our pricing analysts take appropriate action to
reduce valuation of securities where an event occurs which negatively impacts
the securities' value. Certain events that could impact the valuation of
securities include issuer credit ratings, business climate, management changes,
and litigation and government actions, among others.
As part of the valuation process we attempt to identify securities which
may have experienced an other than temporary decline in value, and thus require
the recognition of an impairment. To assist in identifying impairments, at the
end of each quarter our Investment Review Committee reviews all securities where
market value is less than ninety percent of amortized cost for three months or
more to determine whether impairments need to be taken. This committee includes
the head of workouts, the head of each industry team, the head of portfolio
management, the Chief Investment Officer, and the Corporate Chief Risk Officer
who reports to the Chief Financial Officer. The analysis focuses on each
company's or project's ability to service its debts in a timely fashion and the
length of time the security has been trading below cost. The results of this
analysis are reviewed by the Life Company's Committee of Finance, a subcommittee
of the Life Company's Board of Directors, quarterly. To supplement this process,
a quarterly review is made of the entire fixed maturity portfolio to assess
credit quality, including a review of all impairments with the Life Company's
Committee of Finance. See "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations--General
Account Investments" section of this document for a more detailed discussion of
this process and the judgments used therein.
Benefit Plans
The Company annually reviews its pension and other post-employment benefit
plan assumptions for the discount rate, the long-term rate of return on plan
assets, and the compensation increase rate. All assumptions are reviewed and
approved by the Chief Financial Officer and reviewed with the Audit Committee of
the Board of Directors.
The assumed discount rate is set in the range of (a) the rate from the
December daily weighted average of long-term corporate bond yields (as published
by Moody's Investor Services for rating categories A, Aa, Aaa, and Baa) less a
5% allowance for expenses and default and (b) the rate from the rounded average
of the prior year's discount rate and the rate in (a) above. In 2004 the Company
set the rate at 6.25%. A 0.25% increase in the discount rate would decrease
pension benefits Projected Benefit Obligation (PBO) and 2004 Net Periodic
Pension Cost (NPPC) by approximately $56.1 million and $3.7 million
respectively. A 0.25% increase in the discount rate would decrease other
post-employment benefits Accumulated Postretirement Benefit Obligation (APBO)
and 2004 Net Periodic Benefit Cost (NPBC) by approximately $14.3 million and
$1.0 million respectively.
The assumed long-term rate of return on plan assets is generally set at
the long-term rate expected to be earned (based on the Capital Asset Pricing
Model and similar tools) based on the long-term investment policy of the plans
and the various classes of the invested funds. For 2004 Net Periodic Pension
(and Benefit) cost, it is expected that an 8.75% long term rate of return
assumption will be used. A 0.25% increase in the long-term rate of return would
decrease 2004 NPPC by approximately $5.0 million and 2004 NPBC by approximately
$0.6 million. The expected return on plan assets is based on the fair market
value of the plan assets as of December 31, 2003.
The compensation rate increase assumption is generally set at a rate
consistent with current and expected long-term compensation and salary policy;
including inflation. A change in the compensation rate increase assumption can
be expected to move in the same direction as a change in the discount rate. A
0.25% increase in the salary scale would increase 2004 pension benefits PBO and
NPPC by approximately $5.6 million and $1.1 million, respectively. A 0.25%
decrease in the salary scale would decrease 2004 pension benefits PBO and NPPC
by approximately $5.6 million and $1.1 million respectively. Post employment
benefits are independent of compensation.
The Company uses a 5% corridor for the amortization of actuarial
gains/losses. Actuarial gains/losses are amortized over approximately 13 years
for pension costs and over approximately 13 years for benefit costs.
Prior service costs are amortized over approximately 9 years for pension
costs and over approximately 17 years for benefit costs.
Income Taxes
Our reported effective tax rate on net income was 24.0% and 29.9% for the
three month periods ended March 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively. Our effective
tax rate is based on expected income, statutory tax rates and tax planning
opportunities available to us. Significant judgment is required in determining
our effective tax rate and in evaluating our tax positions. We establish
28
JOHN HANCOCK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
reserves when, despite our belief that our tax return positions are fully
supportable, we believe that certain positions are likely to be challenged and
that we may not succeed. We adjust these reserves in light of changing facts and
circumstances, such as the progress of a tax audit. Our effective tax rate
includes the impact of reserve provisions and changes to reserves that we
consider appropriate, as well as related interest. This rate is then applied to
our year-to-date operating results.
Tax regulations require certain items to be included in the tax return at
different times than those items are reflected in the financial statements. As a
result, our effective tax rate reflected in our financial statements is
different than that reported in our tax return. Some of these differences are
permanent, such as affordable housing tax credits, and some are temporary
differences, such as depreciation expense. Temporary differences create deferred
tax assets and liabilities. Deferred tax assets generally represent items that
can be used as a tax deduction or credit in our tax return in future years for
which we have already recorded the tax benefit in our income statement. Our
policy is to establish valuation allowances for deferred tax assets when the
amount of expected future taxable income is not likely to support the use of the
deduction or credit. Deferred tax liabilities generally represent tax expense
recognized in our financial statements for which payment has been deferred or
expense for which we have already taken a deduction on our tax return, but have
not yet recognized as expense in our financial statements.
A number of years may elapse before a particular matter, for which we have
established a reserve, is audited and finally resolved. The Internal Revenue
Service is currently examining our tax returns for 1996 through 1998.
While it is often difficult to predict the final outcome or the timing of
resolution of any particular tax matter, we believe that our reserves reflect
the probable outcome of known tax contingencies. Our tax reserves are presented
in the balance sheet within other liabilities.
Reinsurance
We reinsure portions of the risks we assume for our protection insurance
products. The maximum amount of individual ordinary life insurance retained by
us on any life is $10 million under an individual policy and $20 million under a
second-to-die policy. As of January 1, 2001, we established additional
reinsurance programs, which limit our exposure to fluctuations in life insurance
claims for individuals for whom the net amount at risk is $3 million or more. As
of January 1, 2001, the Company entered into an agreement with two reinsurers
covering 50% of its closed block business. Effective December 31, 2003, the
Company entered into an agreement with a third reinsurer covering another 5% of
its closed block business. The treaties are structured so they will not affect
policyholder dividends or any other financial items reported within the closed
block, which was established at the time of the Life Company's demutualization
to protect the reasonable dividend expectations of certain participating life
insurance policyholders.
In addition, the Company has entered into reinsurance agreements to
specifically address insurance exposure to multiple life insurance claims as a
result of a catastrophic event. The Company has put into place, effective July
1, 2002, catastrophic reinsurance covering both individual and group life
insurance policies written by all of its U.S. life insurance subsidiaries.
Effective July 1, 2003, the deductible for individual and group coverages
combined was reduced from $25 million to $17.5 million per occurrence and the
limit of coverage is $40 million per occurrence. Both the deductible and the
limit apply to the combined U.S. insurance subsidiaries. Should catastrophic
reinsurance become unavailable to the Company in the future, the absence of, or
further limitations on, reinsurance coverage, could adversely affect the
Company's future net income and financial position.
By entering into reinsurance agreements with a diverse group of highly
rated reinsurers, we seek to control our exposure to losses. Our reinsurance,
however, does not discharge our legal obligations to pay policy claims on the
policies reinsured. As a result, we enter into reinsurance agreements only with
highly rated reinsurers. Nevertheless, there can be no assurance that all our
reinsurers will pay the claims we make against them. Failure of a reinsurer to
pay a claim could adversely affect our business, financial condition or results
of operations.
Our long-term care insurance business units reinsure with John Hancock
Reassurance Company, LTD (JHReCo), a wholly owned subsidiary of JHFS. In 2001,
Group Long Term Care ceded 50% of their inforce business prior to 1997 to JHReCo
(up from 40% in 2000 and 30% in 1999) and 50% of all new business effective in
1997 and later. Retail Long-Term Care cedes to JHReCo; 50% of all new business
effective 1997 and later and 50% of business assumed from the acquisition of the
Fortis long-term care insurance business in March of 2000. Fortis was
retro-ceded to JHReCo.
29
JOHN HANCOCK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Our non-traditional life insurance business reinsures with JHReCo 100% of
the risk associated with the no lapse guarantee benefit present in the
protection universal life insurance products. This reinsurance agreement was
effective in 2001 and includes policies issued in years 2001 and later. In
addition, the traditional life insurance business entered into a reinsurance
agreement with JHReCo to reinsure 50% of its retained level premium term
business written by the Company's subsidiary, John Hancock Variable Life
Insurance Company. The agreement was effective in 2002 and includes inforce
policies.
Economic Trends
Economic trends impact profitability and sales of the Company. The impact
of economic trends on the Company's profitability are similar to their impact on
the financial markets. The Company estimates that a full year increase
(decrease) in interest rates of 1.0% would increase (decrease) segment after tax
operating income by approximately $5 million, and that a full year increase
(decrease) in equity markets of 5% would increase (decrease) segment after tax
operating income by approximately $11 million.
Transactions Affecting Comparability of Results of Operations
The acquisition described under the table below was recorded under the
purchase method of accounting and, accordingly, the operating results have been
included in the Company's consolidated results of operations from the date of
acquisition. The purchase price was allocated to the assets acquired and the
liabilities assumed based on estimated fair values, with the excess of the
applicable purchase price over the estimated fair values recorded as goodwill.
This acquisition was made by the Company in execution of its plan to acquire
businesses that have strategic value, meet its earnings requirements and advance
the growth of its current businesses.
The disposal described under the table below was conducted in order to
execute the Company's strategy to focus resources on business in which it can
have a leadership position. The table below presents actual and proforma data,
for comparative purposes, of revenue, net income and earnings per share for the
periods indicated, to demonstrate the proforma effect of the acquisition and of
the disposal as if it occurred on January 1, 2003.
Three Months Ended March 31,
2004 2003
Proforma 2004 Proforma 2003
--------------------------------------------
(in millions)
Revenue..................... $1,736.9 $1,736.9 $1,826.0 $1,857.1
Net income.................. $154.3 $154.3 $270.1 $271.0
Acquisition:
On December 31, 2003, the Company acquired the fixed universal life
insurance business of Allmerica Financial Corporation (Allmerica) through a
reinsurance agreement for approximately $104.3 million.
Disposal:
On June 19, 2003, the Company agreed to sell its group life insurance
business through a reinsurance agreement with Metropolitan Life Insurance
Company, Inc (MetLife). The Company is ceding all activity after May 1, 2003 to
MetLife. The transaction was recorded as of May 1, 2003 and closed November 4,
2003. There was no impact on the Company's results of operations from the
disposed operations during the first three months of 2003.
Subsequent Events
Refer to Business section of Note 1 - Summary of Significant Accounting
Policies and the Merger with Manulife Financial Corporation section of this
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations for information regarding the completion of the Company's merger with
Manulife as of April 28, 2004.
In early April 2004, the Company received notice of a settlement arising
out of bankruptcy proceedings of Enron Corporation. The Company recorded the
proceeds of Enron settlements against previously impaired investments in Enron
30
JOHN HANCOCK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
securities resulting in a net realized investment and other gain of
approximately $26.5 million, pre-tax, consisting of $9.0 million in cash and an
unsecured claim against Enron Corporation of $201.7 million, which is valued at
$17.5 million.
In April 2004, the Company received notification from the Massachusetts
Turnpike Authority of approval of the assignment of the Company's parking garage
air rights lease to Beacon Capital. Approval of the transfer of this lease
allowed the Company to recognize a $74.0 million realized gain in April 2004
which had previously been deferred.
31
JOHN HANCOCK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Results of Operations
The table below presents the consolidated results of operations for the
periods presented.
Three Months Ended
March 31,
2004 2003
------------------------
(in millions)
Revenues
Premiums ............................................................ $ 470.7 $ 472.3
Universal life and investment-type product fees ..................... 176.8 155.0
Net investment income ............................................... 983.5 933.1
Net realized investment and other gains (losses), net of
related amortization of deferred policy acquisition
costs, amounts credited to participating pensions
contractholders and the policyholder dividend
obligation (1) ................................................ (97.7) 105.4
Investment management revenues, commissions, and other fees ......... 132.4 119.2
Other revenue ....................................................... 71.2 72.1
------------------------
Total revenues .................................... 1,736.9 1,857.1
Benefits and expenses
Benefits to policyholders, excluding amounts related to net
realized investment and other gains (losses) credited
to participating pension contractholders and the
policyholder dividend obligation (2) .......................... 935.3 949.3
Other operating costs and expenses .................................. 374.6 318.7
Amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs, excluding
amounts related to net realized investment and other
gains (losses) (3) ............................................ 102.9 69.8
Dividends to policyholders .......................................... 116.6 132.5
------------------------
Total benefits and expenses ........................ 1,529.4 1,470.3
Income before taxes and cumulative effect of
accounting change ............................................. 207.5 386.8
Income taxes ........................................................ 49.9 115.8
------------------------
Income before cumulative effect of accounting change ................ 157.6 271.0
Cumulative effect of accounting change .............................. (3.3) --
------------------------
Net income .......................................... $ 154.3 $ 271.0
========================
(1) Net of related amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs, amounts
credited to participating pension contractholders and the policyholder
dividend obligation of $(0.8) million and $(49.8) million for the three
months ended March 31, 2004 and 2003.
(2) Excluding amounts related to net realized investment and other gains
(losses) credited to participating pension contractholders and the
policyholder dividend obligation of $17.2 million and $(41.3) million for
the three months ended March 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively.
(3) Excluding amounts related to net realized investment and other gains
(losses) of $(18.0) million and $(8.5) million for the three months ended
March 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively.
32
JOHN HANCOCK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Three Months Ended March 31, 2004 Compared to Three Months Ended March 31, 2003
Consolidated income before income taxes decreased 46.4%, or $179.3
million, for the three month period ended March 31, 2004 from the prior year.
The decrease was driven by net realized investment and other gains in the prior
year for the sale of Home Office properties which did not recur in the current
period. The Company recognized a gain of $281.1 million (and a deferred profit
of $200.3 million) on the sale of the Company's Home Office properties in the
first quarter of 2003. Partially offsetting the decline in net realized
investment and other gains (losses) was growth in earnings in our variable
annuity business and mutual funds business driven by market appreciation and
deposits on account balances and assets under management. Also contributing to
earnings was growth in universal and variable life insurance business on higher
account balances driven by investment performance. Operating costs and expenses
grew 17.5%, or $55.9 million, with each business contributing to the increase.
The Company recorded a decrease to net income of $3.3 million (net of tax of
$1.8 million) resulting from the adoption of a new accounting pronouncement,
Statement of Position 03-1 - Accounting and Reporting by Insurance Enterprises
for Certain Untraditional Long Duration Contracts for Separate Accounts (SOP
03-1), refer to Note 1 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies for
additional information.
Premiums decreased 0.3%, or $1.6 million, from the prior year. The
decrease in premiums was due largely to a decrease in premiums of $30.1 million
in the group life business due to its sale. Group life was sold on June 19,
2003. Also contributing is a $14.1 million, or 89.9%, decrease in the annuity
business primarily from lower sales of single premium immediate annuities and a
decrease of $8.6 million, or 3.5%, in traditional life products. Offsetting
these decreases, premiums in the long-term care insurance business increased
$22.8 million, or 18.1%, primarily due to business growth resulting from higher
new sales and strong renewal premiums and lower lapses. In addition, the
premiums in the fee-based business increased $2.0 million.
Universal life and investment-type product fees increased 14.0%, or $21.8
million, over the prior year. The increase in product fees was driven by both
the variable life and universal life. Investment-type product fees increased
19.9%, or $16.6 million, in the variable life business due primarily to the
higher mortality and expense fees. Universal life products increased 37.3%, or
$10.8 million, due primarily to growth in the existing business and an increase
in amortization of deferred revenue. Partially offsetting these increases in
product fees was a decrease in fees in the retail annuities business.
Net investment income increased 5.4%, or $50.4 million, from the prior
year. Net investment income increased 28.9%, or $15.3 million, in the long-term
care business due to higher net invested assets in the current period. Net
investment income in the annuity business increased $11.9 million, or 7.2%, due
to growth in average invested assets of 16.7%, or $1,589.4 million, partially
offset by a 62 basis point decrease in average investment yield. In addition,
non-traditional life increased 14.0%, or $10.3 million. Offsetting the increase,
net investment income in the spread-based business decreased 6.8%, or $25.4
million, despite growth in the spread-based average invested assets. The average
yield on invested assets decreased to 5.48%, reflecting the lower interest rate
environment in the current period. Net investment income varies with market
interest rates as the return on approximately $11 billion of the weighted
average asset portfolio, floats with market rates. Matching the interest rate
exposure on our asset portfolio to the exposure on our liabilities is a central
feature of our asset/liability management process. For additional analysis of
net investment income and yields see the General Account Investments section of
this MD&A.
Net realized investment and other gains (losses) decreased 192.7%, or
$203.1 million, driven by the sale of the Home Office properties in the first
quarter of 2003. The Company recognized a gain of $281.1 million (and a deferred
profit of $200.3 million) on the sale of the Company's Home Office properties in
the first quarter of 2003. See detail of current period net realized investment
and other gains (losses) in table below. The change in net realized investment
and other losses is the result of impairments of fixed maturity securities of
$68.3 million and hedging adjustments of $51.9 million. The largest impairments
were $22.0 million on private placement securities related to secured lease
obligations of a regional retail food chain, $17.5 million relating to one of
the world's largest dairy companies, and $13.9 million relating to a
manufacturer of parcel delivery vans. The net realized investment and other loss
on other than temporary declines in value of fixed maturity securities was
offset by a gains on the sale of fixed maturity securities recovery on
previously written down securities (see footnote for details) and prepayment
gains of $33.4 million. Most of these gains resulted from managing our
portfolios for tax optimization and ongoing portfolio positioning.
33
JOHN HANCOCK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Gross Gain Gross Loss Hedging Net Realized Investment
For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2004 Impairment on Disposal on Disposal Adjustments and Other Gain/(Loss)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
(in millions)
Fixed maturity securities (1)(2) ........ $(68.3) $ 74.8 $ (5.4) $(51.9) $(50.8)
Equity securities (3) .................... (4.7) 69.1 (0.7) -- 63.7
Mortgage loans on real estate ............ -- 14.1 (3.7) (14.1) (3.7)
Real estate .............................. -- 3.7 (0.1) -- 3.6
Other invested assets .................... (7.4) 2.2 (6.1) -- (11.3)
Derivatives .............................. -- -- -- (100.0) (100.0)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal .................. $(80.4) $163.9 $(16.0) $(166.0) $(98.5)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Amortization adjustment for deferred policy acquisition costs................... $18.0
Amounts credited to participating pension contractholders....................... (2.0)
Amounts credited to the policyholder dividend obligation........................ (15.2)
----------------
Total...................................................................... $(97.7)
================
(1) Fixed maturities gain on disposals includes $5.4 million of gains from
previously impaired securities and prepayment gains of $33.4 million.
(2) Fixed maturities loss on disposals includes $0.6 million of credit related
losses.
(3) Equity securities gain on disposal includes $9.3 million of gains from
equity securities received as settlement compensation from an investee
whose securities had previously been impaired.
The hedging adjustments in the fixed maturities and mortgage loans asset
classes are non-cash adjustments representing the amortization or reversal of
prior fair value adjustments on assets in those classes that were or are
designated as hedged items in a fair value hedge. When an asset or liability is
so designated, its cost basis is adjusted in response to movement in interest
rates. These adjustments are non-cash and reverse with the passage of time as
the asset or liability and derivative mature. The hedging adjustments on the
derivatives represent non-cash adjustments on derivative instruments and on
assets and liabilities designated as hedged items reflecting the change in fair
value of those items.
Advisory fees increased 11.1%, or $13.2 million, from the prior year.
Advisory fees increased primarily in the mutual fund business where fees
increased 17.2%, or $11.3 million, over the prior year due to higher assets
under management on higher sales and market appreciation. Advisory fees in our
institutional asset management business increased 5.6% on stable assets under
management. The institutional asset management business generated a 93.8%
increase in deposits during the three months ended March 31, 2004 compared to
the same period in the prior year.
Other revenue decreased 1.2%, or $0.9 million, from the prior year. Other
revenue consists principally of the revenues generated by Signature Fruit, a
subsidiary of the Company since April 2, 2001, which acquired certain assets and
assumed liabilities out of Tri Valley Growers, Inc., a cooperative association
on that date. Signature Fruit generated $62.9 million in revenue for the three
months ended March 31, 2004. In addition, other revenue includes Federal
long-term care business fee revenue of $1.7 million for the three months ended
March 31, 2004. The sale of a run-off business generated $5.5 million in revenue
for the three months ended March 31, 2004.
Benefits to policyholders decreased 1.5%, or $14.0 million, from the prior
year. Benefits to policyholders on spread-based products decreased 9.5% or $22.3
million primarily due to a improved mortality and retirement experience and
lower interest credited on account balances. Spread-based interest credited
decreased 3.7%, or $8.8 million, due to a decline in the average interest
credited rate on account balances, approximately $11 billion of spread-based
liabilities have floating rates which reset. The average crediting rate on
spread-based products decreased to 4.07%. In addition, benefits to policyholders
decreased 13.4%, or $10.7 million, in the corporate and other segment due to the
sale of the group life business. Offsetting the decrease, benefits to
policyholders increased in the long-term care insurance business by $21.8
million, driven by growth in the business. Long-term care insurance premiums
increased $22.8 million which includes 18.1% increase in new premiums.
Operating costs and expenses increased 17.5%, or $55.9 million. Operating
costs and expenses increased $19.7 million in the long-term care business as a
result of its growth. Also contributing to the increase in operating costs and
expenses is an increase of $10.1 million in the corporate and other business and
an increase of $5.1 million, or 9.9%, in the mutual fund business due primarily
to employee compensation costs. In addition, operating costs and expenses
increased $7.2 million in the spread-based business and $3.5 million in the
34
JOHN HANCOCK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
investment management business. Partially offsetting these increases was a
decrease in Signature Fruit of $7.4 million to $62.9 million from the prior
year. Also included in other operating costs and expenses is $(0.8) million for
employee terminations net of other initiatives and curtailment and other post
employment benefit related gains compared to $6.2 million in the prior year. See
Note 7 - Severance included in the notes to the unaudited consolidated financial
statements.
Amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs increased 47.4%, or
$33.1 million, driven by a $24.3 million increase for the non-traditional life
insurance business driven by the unlocking of assumptions for higher future
expected death claims. Also, there was a $2.4 million increase in amortization
of deferred policy acquisition costs from the growth in the long-term care
insurance business where amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs
increased 38.7% from the prior year. In addition, amortization of deferred
policy acquisition costs also increased $7.2 million, or 21.3%, primarily driven
by the unlocking for changing assumptions for future expected death claims and
also higher expected gross margins from increased fund values in the annuity
business.
Dividends to policyholders decreased 12.0%, or $15.9 million from the
prior year. The decrease in dividends to policyholders was driven by traditional
life insurance products which decreased 10.4%, or $12.2 million, due to a cut in
the dividend scale and a $2.5 million decrease in dividends due to the sale of
the group life business. Group life was sold on June 19, 2003 and thus generated
policyholder dividends in the first quarter of 2003 and none after the sale of
the business.
Income taxes were $49.9 million in the first quarter of 2004, compared to
$115.8 million for the first quarter of 2003. Our effective tax rate was 24.1%
in the first quarter of 2004, compared to 29.9% in the first quarter of 2003.
The lower effective tax rate was primarily due to lower capital gains and
increased affordable housing tax credits.
Cumulative effect of accounting change, net of tax, was $(3.3) million.
During the quarter, the Company adopted SOP 03-1 which requires specialized
accounting for insurance companies related to separate accounts, transfers of
assets, liability valuations, returns based on a contractually reference pool of
assets or index, accounting for contracts that contain death or other insurance
benefit features, accounting for reinsurance and other similar contracts,
accounting for annuitization benefits and sales inducements to contractholders.
35
JOHN HANCOCK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
General Account Investments
We manage our general account assets in investment segments that support
specific classes of product liabilities. These investment segments permit us to
implement investment policies that both support the financial characteristics of
the underlying liabilities, and also provide returns on our invested capital.
The investment segments also enable us to gauge the performance and
profitability of our various businesses.
Asset/Liability Risk Management
Our primary investment objective is to maximize after-tax returns within
acceptable risk parameters. We are exposed to two primary types of investment
risk:
o Interest rate risk, meaning changes in the market value of fixed maturity
securities as interest rates change over time, and
o Credit risk, meaning uncertainties associated with the continued ability
of an obligor to make timely payments of principal and interest.
We use a variety of techniques to control interest rate risk in our
portfolio of assets and liabilities. In general, our risk management philosophy
is to limit the net impact of interest rate changes on our assets and
liabilities. Assets are invested predominantly in fixed income securities, and
the asset portfolio is matched with the liabilities so as to eliminate the
Company's exposure to changes in the overall level of interest rates. Each
investment segment holds bonds, mortgages, and other asset types that will
satisfy the projected cash needs of its underlying liabilities. Another
important aspect of our asset-liability management efforts is the use of
interest rate derivatives. We selectively apply derivative instruments, such as
interest rate swaps and futures, to reduce the interest rate risk inherent in
combined portfolios of assets and liabilities.
Management of credit risk is central to our business and we devote
considerable resources to the credit analysis underlying each investment
acquisition. Our corporate bond management group includes a staff of highly
specialized, experienced, and well-trained credit analysts. We rely on these
analysts' ability to analyze complex private financing transactions and to
acquire the investments needed to profitably fund our liability requirements. In
addition, when investing in private fixed maturity securities, we rely upon
broad access to proprietary management information, negotiated protective
covenants, call protection features and collateral protection.
Our bond portfolio is reviewed on a continuous basis to assess the
integrity of current quality ratings. As circumstances warrant, specific
investments are "re-rated" with the adjusted quality ratings reflected in our
investment system. All bonds are evaluated regularly against the following
criteria:
o material declines in the issuer's revenues or margins;
o significant management or organizational changes;
o significant uncertainty regarding the issuer's industry;
o debt service coverage or cash flow ratios that fall below
industry-specific thresholds;
o violation of financial covenants; and
o other business factors that relate to the issuer.
Insurance product prices are impacted by investment results as well as
other results (e.g. mortality, lapse). Accordingly, incorporated in insurance
products prices are assumptions of expected default losses over the long-term.
Actual losses therefore vary above and below this average, and the market value
of the portfolio as a whole also changes as market credit spreads move up and
down during an economic cycle.
John Hancock is able to hold to this investment strategy over the long
term, both because of its strong capital position, the fixed nature of its
liabilities and the matching of those liabilities with assets and because of the
experience gained through many decades of a consistent investment philosophy. We
generally intend to hold all of our fixed maturity investments to maturity to
meet liability payments, and to ride out any unrealized gains and losses over
the long term. However, we do sell bonds under certain circumstances, such as
when new information causes us to change our assessment of whether a bond will
recover or perform according to its contractual terms, in response to external
events (such as a merger or a downgrade) that result in investment guideline
violations (such as single issuer or overall portfolio credit quality limits),
in response to extreme catastrophic events (such as September 11, 2001) that
result in industry or market wide disruption, or to take advantage of tender
offers.
36
JOHN HANCOCK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Overall Composition of the General Account
Invested assets, excluding separate accounts totaled $69.6 billion and
$66.9 billion as of March 31, 2004 and December 31, 2003, respectively. Although
the portfolio composition has not significantly changed at March 31, 2004
compared to December 31, 2003, invested assets grew 4.0%. The adoption of the
new accounting pronouncement SOP 03-01, Accounting and Reporting by Insurance
Enterprises for Certain Non Traditional Long Duration Contracts and for Separate
Accounts, increased fixed maturity securities by $0.9 billion. The following
table shows the composition of investments in the general account portfolio.
As of March 31, As of December 31,
2004 2003
-------------------------------------------------------------
Carrying % of Carrying % of
Value Total Value Total
-------------------------------------------------------------
(in millions)
Fixed maturity securities (1) ............ $50,841.8 73.0% $47,970.8 71.7%
Mortgage loans (2) ....................... 10,722.3 15.4 10,871.1 16.3
Real estate .............................. 121.3 0.2 123.8 0.2
Policy loans (3) ......................... 2,014.2 2.9 2,019.2 3.0
Equity securities ........................ 265.3 0.4 333.7 0.5
Other invested assets (4) ................ 3,179.6 4.6 2,912.2 4.4
Short-term investments ................... 7.7 -- 31.5 --
Cash and cash equivalents (5) ............ 2,427.9 3.5 2,626.9 3.9
-------------------------------------------------------------
Total invested assets .................... $69,580.1 100.0% $66,889.2 100.0%
=============================================================
(1) In addition to bonds, the fixed maturity security portfolio contains
redeemable preferred stock with a carrying value of $920.7 million and
$600.3 million as of March 31, 2004 and December 31, 2003, respectively.
The total fair value of the fixed maturity security portfolio was
$50,864.8 million and $47,994.9 million, at March 31, 2004 and December
31, 2003, respectively.
(2) The fair value for the mortgage loan portfolio was $12,006.8 million and
$11,791.4 million as of March 31, 2004 and December 31, 2003,
respectively.
(3) Policy loans are secured by the cash value of the underlying life
insurance policies and do not mature in a conventional sense, but expire
in conjunction with the related policy liabilities.
(4) Cash and cash equivalents are included in total invested assets in the
table above for the purposes of calculating yields on the income producing
assets for the Company.
Consistent with the nature of the Company's product liabilities, assets
are heavily oriented toward fixed maturity securities. The Company determines
the allocation of assets primarily on the basis of cash flow and return
requirements of its products and by the level of investment risk.
Fixed Maturity Securities. The fixed maturity securities portfolio is
predominantly comprised of low risk, investment grade, publicly and privately
traded corporate bonds and senior tranches of asset-backed securities (ABS) and
mortgage-backed securities (MBS). The fixed maturity securities portfolio also
includes redeemable preferred stock. As of March 31, 2004, fixed maturity
securities represented 73.0% of general account invested assets with a carrying
value of $50.8 billion, comprised of 50.5% public securities and 49.5% private
securities. Each year, the Company directs the majority of net cash inflows into
investment grade fixed maturity securities. Typically, between 5% and 15% of
funds allocated to fixed maturity securities are invested in below investment
grade bonds while maintaining a policy to limit the overall level of these bonds
to no more than 9% of invested assets and the majority of that balance in the BB
category. The Company has established a long-term target of limiting investments
in below investment grade bonds to 8% of invested assets by 2005 for its U.S.
life insurance companies on a statutory accounting basis. Allocations are based
on an assessment of relative value and the likelihood of enhancing risk-adjusted
portfolio returns. While the Company has profited from the
below-investment-grade asset class in the past, care is taken to manage its
growth strategically by limiting its size relative to the Company's total
assets.
The Securities Valuation Office (SVO) of the National Association of
Insurance Commissioners evaluates all public and private bonds purchased as
investments by insurance companies. The SVO assigns one of six investment
categories to each security it reviews. Category 1 is the highest quality
rating, and Category 6 is the lowest. Categories 1 and 2 are the equivalent of
37
JOHN HANCOCK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
investment grade debt as defined by rating agencies such as S&P and Moody's
(i.e., BBB /Baa3 or higher), while Categories 3-6 are the equivalent of
below-investment grade securities. SVO ratings are reviewed and may be revised
at least once a year.
The following table shows the composition by credit quality of the fixed
maturity securities portfolio.
Fixed Maturity Securities -- By Credit Quality
------------------------------------------------------------
As of March 31, As of December 31,
2004 2003
------------------------------------------------------------
SVO S&P Equivalent Carrying % of Carrying % of
Rating (1) Designation (2) Value (3)(4)(5) Total Value (3)(4)(5) Total
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(in millions)
1 AAA/AA/A....................... $21,424.2 42.9% $19,612.6 41.4%
2 BBB............................ 22,251.8 44.6 21,645.6 45.7
3 BB............................. 3,185.9 6.4 2,953.2 6.2
4 B.............................. 1,888.0 3.8 1,919.4 4.1
5 CCC and lower.................. 912.0 1.8 841.3 1.8
6 In or near default............. 259.2 0.5 398.4 0.8
------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal................ 49,921.1 100.0% 47,370.5 100.0%
Redeemable preferred
stock..................... 920.7 600.3
------------------------------------------------------------
Total fixed maturities....... $50,841.8 $47,970.8
============================================================
(1) For securities that are awaiting an SVO rating, the Company has assigned a
rating based on an analysis that it believes is equivalent to that used by
the SVO.
(2) Comparisons between SVO and S&P ratings are published by the National
Association of Insurance Commissioners.
(3) Includes 118 securities that are awaiting an SVO rating, with a carrying
value of $2,045.4 million as of March 31, 2004 and 175 securities that are
awaiting an SVO rating, with a carrying value of $4,032.7 million at
December 31, 2003. Due to lags between the funding of an investment, the
processing of final legal documents, the filing with the SVO, and the
rating by the SVO, there will always be a number of unrated securities at
each statement date.
(4) Includes the effect of $150.0 million notional invested in the Company's
credit-linked note program, $130.0 million notional of written credit
default swaps on fixed maturity securities in the AAA/AA/A category and
$20.0 million notional of written credit default swaps on fixed maturity
securities in the BBB category. As of December 31, 2003 the Company had
$130.0 million notional invested in the Company's credit linked note
program, $110.0 million notional written credit default swaps on fixed
maturity securities in the AAA/AA/A category and $20.0 million notional
written credit default swaps on fixed maturity securities in the BBB
category.
(5) The Company entered into a credit enhancement agreement in the form of a
guaranty from an AAA rated financial guarantor in 1996. To reflect the
impact of this guaranty on the overall portfolio, the Company has
presented securities covered in aggregate by the guaranty at rating levels
provided by the SVO and Moody's that reflect the guaranty. As a result,
$23.5 million of SVO Rating 2, $339.8 million of SVO Rating 3, $141.3
million of SVO Rating 4, and $7.6 million of SVO Rating 5 underlying
securities are included as $291.7 million of SVO Rating 1, $165.4 million
of SVO Rating 2 and $55.1 million of SVO Rating 3 as of March 31, 2004 and
$421.0 million of SVO Rating 3, $185.2 million of SVO Rating 4, and $7.6
million of SVO Rating 5 underlying securities are included as $397.6
million of SVO Rating 1, $162.1 million of SVO Rating 2 and $54.1 million
of SVO Rating 3 as of December 31, 2003. The guaranty also contains a
provision that the guarantor can recover from the Company certain amounts
paid over the history of the program in the event a payment is required
under the guaranty. As of March 31, 2004 and December 31, 2003, the
maximum amount that can be recovered under this provision was $119.9
million and $112.8 million, respectively.
The table above sets forth the SVO ratings for the bond portfolio along
with an equivalent S&P rating agency designation. The majority of the rated
fixed maturity investments are investment grade, with 87.5% and 87.1% of fixed
maturity investments invested in Category 1 and 2 securities as of March 31,
2004 and December 31, 2003, respectively. Below investment grade bonds were
12.5% and 12.9% of the rated fixed maturity investments as of March 31, 2004 and
December 31, 2003, respectively, and 9.0% and 9.1% of total invested assets at
March 31, 2004 and December 31, 2003, respectively. This allocation reflects the
Company strategy of avoiding the unpredictability of interest rate risk in favor
of relying on the Company's bond analysts' ability to better predict credit or
default risk. The bond analysts operate in an industry-based, team-oriented
38
JOHN HANCOCK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
structure that permits the evaluation of a wide range of below investment grade
offerings in a variety of industries resulting in a well-diversified high yield
portfolio.
Valuation techniques for the bond portfolio vary by security type and the
availability of market data. Pricing models and their underlying assumptions
impact the amount and timing of unrealized gains and losses recognized, and the
use of different pricing models or assumptions could produce different financial
results. External pricing services are used where available, broker dealer
quotes are used for thinly traded securities, and a spread pricing matrix is
used when price quotes are not available, which typically is the case for our
private placement securities. The spread pricing matrix is based on credit
quality, country of issue, market sector and average investment life and is
created for these dimensions through brokers' estimates of public spreads
derived from their respective publications. When utilizing the spread pricing
matrix, securities are valued through a discounted cash flow method where each
bond is assigned a spread that is added to the current U.S. Treasury rates to
discount the cash flows of the security. The spread assigned to each security is
changed from month to month based on changes in the market. Certain market
events that could impact the valuation of securities include issuer credit
ratings, business climate, management changes, litigation, and government
actions among others. The resulting prices are then reviewed by the pricing
analysts and members of the Controller's Department. The Company's pricing
analysts take appropriate actions to reduce valuations of securities where such
an event occurs that negatively impacts the securities' value. Although the
Company believes its estimates reasonably reflect the fair value of those
securities, the key assumptions about risk premiums, performance of underlying
collateral (if any) and other factors involve significant assumptions and may
not reflect those of an active market. To the extent that bonds have longer
maturity dates, management's estimate of fair value may involve greater
subjectivity since they involve judgment about events well into the future.
Then, every quarter, there is a comprehensive review of all impaired securities
and problem loans by a group consisting of the Chief Investment Officer and the
Bond Investment Committee, including the Chief Risk Officer who reports to the
Chief Financial Officer. The valuation of impaired bonds for which there is no
quoted price is typically based on the present value of the future cash flows
expected to be received. If the company is likely to continue operations, the
estimate of future cash flows is typically based on the expected operating cash
flows of the company that are available to make payments on the bonds. If the
company is likely to liquidate, the estimate of future cash flows is based on an
estimate of the liquidation value of its net assets.
As of March 31, 2004 and December 31, 2003, 51.0% and 48.3% of our below
investment grade bonds are in Category 3, the highest quality below investment
grade. Category 6 bonds, those in or near default, represent securities that
were originally acquired as long-term investments, but subsequently became
distressed. The carrying value of bonds in or near default was $259.2 million
and $398.4 million as of March 31, 2004 and December 31, 2003, respectively. As
of March 31, 2004 and December 31, 2003, $1.2 million and $4.1 million,
respectively, of interest on bonds near default were included in accrued
investment income. Unless the Company reasonably expects to collect investment
income on bonds in or near default, the accrual will be ceased and any accrued
income reversed. Management judgment is used and the actual results could be
materially different.
In keeping with the investment philosophy of tightly managing interest
rate risk, the Company's MBS & ABS holdings are heavily concentrated in
commercial MBS where the underlying loans are largely call protected, which
means they are not pre-payable without penalty prior to maturity at the option
of the issuer. By investing in MBS and ABS securities with relatively
predictable repayments, the Company adds high quality, liquid assets to our
portfolios without incurring the risk of cash flow variability. The Company
believes the portion of its MBS/ABS portfolio subject to prepayment risk as of
March 31, 2004 and December 31, 2003 was limited to approximately 20.2% and
22.3%, respectively ,of our total MBS/ABS portfolio and 3.7% and 3.4%,
respectively, of our total fixed maturity securities holdings, at each period
end.
The following table shows the composition by our internal industry
classification of the fixed maturity securities portfolio and the unrealized
gains and losses contained therein.
39
JOHN HANCOCK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Fixed Maturity Securities -- By Industry Classification/Sector
Investment Grade as of March 31, 2004
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Carrying Value Carrying Value
of Securities of Securities
Net with Gross Gross with Gross Gross
Total Carrying Unrealized Unrealized Unrealized Unrealized Unrealized
Value Gain (Loss) Gains Gains Losses Losses
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(in millions)
Corporate securities:
Banking and finance ............. $ 6,551.5 $ 444.9 $ 5,982.1 $ 456.6 $ 569.4 $ (11.7)
Communications .................. 2,920.4 263.9 2,779.9 266.8 140.5 (2.9)
Government ...................... 3,215.6 172.3 2,137.8 179.3 1,077.8 (7.0)
Manufacturing ................... 6,278.7 473.3 5,603.4 486.8 675.3 (13.5)
Oil & gas ....................... 3,900.9 414.8 3,808.0 415.9 92.9 (1.1)
Services / trade ................ 2,588.8 204.7 2,534.3 205.8 54.5 (1.1)
Transportation .................. 2,299.3 138.2 1,845.9 182.1 453.4 (43.9)
Utilities ....................... 7,094.5 606.0 6,390.5 619.7 704.0 (13.7)
Other ........................... -- -- -- -- -- --
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total corporate securities ........ 34,849.7 2,718.1 31,081.9 2,813.0 3,767.8 (94.9)
Asset-backed and mortgage-
backed securities ................ 8,680.1 388.2 7,442.6 439.7 1,237.5 (51.5)
U.S. Treasury securities and
obligations of U.S. government
agencies ......................... 320.3 6.3 283.8 6.5 36.5 (0.2)
Debt securities issued by foreign
governments ...................... 201.3 17.4 200.0 17.4 1.3 --
Obligations of states and political
subdivisions ..................... 359.1 18.7 353.0 18.7 6.1 --
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total ........................... $44,410.5 $ 3,148.7 $39,361.3 $ 3,295.3 $ 5,049.2 $ (146.6)
===========================================================================================
40
JOHN HANCOCK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Fixed Maturity Securities -- By Industry Classification/Sector
Below Investment Grade as of March 31, 2004
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Carrying Value Carrying Value
of Securities of Securities
Net with Gross Gross with Gross Gross
Total Carrying Unrealized Unrealized Unrealized Unrealized Unrealized
Value Gain (Loss) Gains Gains Losses Losses
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(in millions)
Corporate securities:
Banking and finance .............. $ 27.8 $ 1.0 $ 23.2 $ 1.0 $ 4.6 --
Communications ................... 238.4 7.7 148.9 18.8 89.5 $ (11.1)
Government ....................... 11.5 -- 1.7 0.3 9.8 (0.3)
Manufacturing .................... 1,353.8 83.2 994.1 97.2 359.7 (14.0)
Oil & gas ........................ 721.9 (4.5) 432.6 30.2 289.3 (34.7)
Services/trade ................... 393.2 39.1 287.3 45.6 105.9 (6.5)
Transportation ................... 474.6 (13.8) 153.2 33.7 321.4 (47.5)
Utilities ........................ 2,593.7 122.3 1,872.7 171.9 721.0 (49.6)
Other ............................ -- -- -- -- -- --
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total corporate securities ......... 5,814.9 235.0 3,913.7 398.7 1,901.2 (163.7)
Asset-backed and mortgage-
backed securities ................. 605.5 (23.9) 299.6 13.8 305.9 (37.7)
U.S. Treasury securities and
obligations of U.S. government
agencies .......................... -- -- -- -- -- --
Debt securities issued by foreign
governments ....................... 10.9 0.4 8.2 0.5 2.7 (0.1)
Obligations of states and political
subdivisions ...................... -- -- -- -- -- --
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total ............................ $6,431.3 $ 211.5 $4,221.5 $ 413.0 $2,209.8 $ (201.5)
========================================================================================
41
JOHN HANCOCK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Fixed Maturity Securities -- By Industry Classification/Sector
Investment Grade as of December 31, 2003
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Carrying Value of Carrying Value of
Net Securities with Gross Securities with Gross
Total Carrying Unrealized Gross Unrealized Unrealized Gross Unrealized Unrealized
Value Gain (Loss) Gains Gains Losses Losses
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(in millions)
Corporate securities:
Banking and finance ........... $ 6,198.6 $ 359.1 $ 5,408.5 $ 370.3 $ 790.1 $ (11.2)
Communications ................ 2,795.5 230.8 2,390.1 239.8 405.4 (9.0)
Government .................... 3,151.1 132.7 2,112.2 140.0 1,038.9 (7.3)
Manufacturing ................. 6,199.1 381.3 5,194.4 411.9 1,004.7 (30.6)
Oil & gas ..................... 3,827.5 342.3 3,660.0 347.9 167.5 (5.6)
Services/trade ................ 2,351.1 170.4 2,222.8 174.3 128.3 (3.9)
Transportation ................ 2,252.9 104.8 1,713.1 138.9 539.8 (34.1)
Utilities ..................... 6,943.5 503.7 6,182.4 528.2 761.1 (24.5)
Other ......................... -- -- -- -- -- --
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total corporate securities ...... 33,719.3 2,225.1 28,883.5 2,351.3 4,835.8 (126.2)
Asset-backed and mortgage-
backed securities .............. 6,956.3 223.0 5,155.1 303.3 1,801.2 (80.3)
U.S. Treasury securities and
obligations of U.S. ............
government agencies ............ 289.3 2.7 111.1 4.1 178.2 (1.4)
Debt securities issued by
foreign governments ............ 244.9 20.2 147.0 21.4 97.9 (1.2)
Obligations of states and
political subdivisions ......... 429.0 16.0 337.1 17.2 91.9 (1.2)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total ......................... $41,638.8 $ 2,487.0 $34,633.8 $ 2,697.3 $ 7,005.0 $ (210.3)
=============================================================================================
Below Investment Grade as of December 31, 2003
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Carrying Value of Carrying Value of
Net Securities with Gross Securities with Gross
Total Carrying Unrealized Gross Unrealized Unrealized Gross Unrealized Unrealized
Value Gain (Loss) Gains Gains Losses Losses
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(in millions)
Corporate securities:
Banking and finance .......... $ 113.4 $ (3.7) $ 84.3 $ 2.6 $ 29.1 $ (6.3)
Communications ............... 203.3 8.2 104.9 17.4 98.4 (9.2)
Government ................... 11.0 (0.4) 1.5 0.2 9.5 (0.6)
Manufacturing ................ 1,414.6 61.8 992.5 93.0 422.1 (31.2)
Oil & gas .................... 673.0 (31.7) 413.9 21.4 259.1 (53.1)
Services/trade ............... 431.4 45.7 324.8 51.1 106.6 (5.4)
Transportation ............... 507.3 (14.4) 182.0 29.9 325.3 (44.3)
Utilities .................... 2,588.2 107.0 1,852.1 153.1 736.1 (46.1)
Other ........................ -- -- -- -- -- --
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total corporate securities ..... 5,942.2 172.5 3,956.0 368.7 1,986.2 (196.2)
Asset-backed and mortgage-
backed securities ............. 380.4 (61.3) 47.0 2.2 333.4 (63.5)
U.S. Treasury securities and
obligations of U.S.
government agencies ........... -- -- -- -- -- --
Debt securities issued by
foreign governments ........... 9.4 0.3 5.7 0.4 3.7 (0.1)
Obligations of states and
political subdivisions ........ -- -- -- -- -- --
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total ........................ $6,332.0 $ 111.5 $4,008.7 $ 371.3 $2,323.3 $ (259.8)
=============================================================================================
42
JOHN HANCOCK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
As of March 31, 2004 and December 31, 2003, there were gross unrealized
gains of $3,708.3 million and $3,068.6 million, and gross unrealized losses of
$348.1 million and $470.1 million on the fixed maturities portfolio. As of March
31, 2004 gross unrealized losses of $348.1 million included $307.2 million, or
88.3%, of gross unrealized losses concentrated in the utilities, manufacturing,
oil and gas, transportation, and asset-backed and mortgage-backed securities.
The tables above show gross unrealized losses before amounts that are allocated
to the closed block policyholders or participating pension contractholders. Of
the $348.1 million of gross unrealized losses in the portfolio at March 31,
2004, $39.3 million was in the closed block and $15.5 million has been allocated
to participating pension contractholders, leaving $293.3 million of gross
unrealized losses after such allocations. The 2003 gross unrealized losses of
$470.1 million included $413.3 million, or 87.9%, of gross unrealized losses
concentrated in the utilities, manufacturing, oil and gas, transportation, and
asset-backed and mortgage-backed securities. The tables above show gross
unrealized losses before amounts that were allocated to the closed block
policyholders or participating pension contractholders. Of the $470.1 million of
gross unrealized losses in the portfolio at December 31, 2003, $61.8 million was
in the closed block and $20.2 million was allocated to participating pension
contractholders, leaving $388.1 million of gross unrealized losses after such
allocations.
Unrealized losses can be created by rising interest rates or by rising
credit concerns and hence widening credit spreads. Credit concerns are apt to
play a larger role in the unrealized loss on below investment grade bonds and
hence the gross unrealized loss on the portfolio has been split between
investment grade and below investment grade bonds in the above tables. The gross
unrealized loss on below investment grade fixed maturity securities declined
from $259.8 million at December 31, 2003 to $201.5 million primarily due to the
easing of credit concerns and the resulting spread tightening.
We remain most concerned about the airline sector. We lend to this
industry almost exclusively on a secured basis (approximately 99% of our loans
are secured). These secured airline financings are of two types: Equipment Trust
Certificates (ETC's) and Enhanced Equipment Trust Certificates (EETC's). The
ETC's initially have an 80% loan-to-value ratio and the EETC senior tranches
initially have a 40-50% loan-to-value and include a provision for a third party
to pay interest for eighteen months from a default. For us to lose money on an
ETC, three things must happen: the airline must default; the airline must decide
it does not want to fly our aircraft, and the aircraft must be worth less than
our loan. When lending to this industry, we underwrite both the airline and the
aircraft. We've been lending to this industry in this fashion for 25 years
through several economic cycles and have seen values on our secured airline
bonds fall and recover through these cycles. EETC's are classified as
asset-backed securities and they account for $49.8 million and $58.6 million of
the $89.2 million and $143.8 million of gross unrealized loss in the
asset-backed and mortgage-backed securities category as of March 31, 2004 and
December 31, 2003, respectively. While the airline industry is making positive
strides in reducing its cost structure, a significant recovery in this sector
requires a growing economy and a pick up in business travel. In the most recent
quarter ending March 31, 2004, U.S. carriers have reported mixed results as
increased fuel prices have offset increases in traffic. We do expect the airline
sector to continue to improve barring any new terrorist events or a reversal of
the course of the U.S. economy. We do still expect that the senior secured
nature of our loans to this industry will protect our holdings through this
difficult time.
The following table shows the composition by credit quality of the
securities with gross unrealized losses in our fixed maturity securities
portfolio. The gross unrealized loss on investment grade bonds (those rated in
categories 1 and 2 by the SVO) declined by $53.3 million in the three months
ending March 31, 2004 to $146.6 million. The gross unrealized loss on below
investment grade bonds (those rated in categories 3, 4, 5, and 6 by the SVO)
declined even more over this period, dropping by $57.7 million to a total of
$201.5 million as of March 31, 2004.
43
JOHN HANCOCK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Unrealized Losses on Fixed Maturity Securities -- By Quality
As of March 31, 2004
---------------------------------------------------------------
Carrying Value of
Securities with
SVO S&P Equivalent Gross Unrealized % of Gross Unrealized
Rating (1) Designation (2) Losses (3) Total Losses (3) % of Total
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(in millions)
1 AAA/AA/A................. $3,500.2 49.9% $ (50.9) 14.6%
2 BBB...................... 1,333.5 19.0 (95.7) 27.5
3 BB....................... 552.2 7.9 (52.7) 15.1
4 B........................ 1,064.7 15.1 (95.3) 27.4
5 CCC and lower............ 525.9 7.5 (46.6) 13.4
6 In or near default....... 42.6 0.6 (6.9) 2.0
---------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal........... 7,019.1 100.0% (348.1) 100.0%
Redeemable preferred
Stock.............. 239.9 --
---------------------------------------------------------------
Total.................... $7,259.0 $(348.1)
===============================================================
(1) With respect to securities that are awaiting rating, the Company has
assigned a rating based on an analysis that it believes is equivalent to
that used by the SVO.
(2) Comparisons between SVO and S&P ratings are published by the National
Association of Insurance Commissioners.
(3) Includes 26 securities with gross unrealized losses that are awaiting an
SVO rating with a carrying value of $497.3 million and unrealized losses
of $11.6 million. Due to lags between the funding of an investment, the
processing of final legal documents, the filing with the SVO, and the
rating by the SVO, there will always be a number of unrated securities at
each statement date. Unrated securities comprised 6.9% and 3.3% of the
total carrying value and total gross unrealized losses of securities in a
loss position, including redeemable preferred stock, respectively.
Unrealized Losses on Fixed Maturity Securities -- By Quality
As of December 31, 2003
--------------------------------------------------------------
Carrying Value of
Securities with
SVO S&P Equivalent Gross Unrealized % of Gross Unrealized % of
Rating (1) Designation (2) Losses (3) Total Losses (3) Total
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(in millions)
1 AAA/AA/A......................... $4,631.6 50.8% $ (93.4) 20.3%
2 BBB.............................. 2,168.2 23.8 (106.5) 23.2
3 BB............................... 664.4 7.3 (74.4) 16.2
4 B................................ 1,068.3 11.7 (90.5) 19.7
5 CCC and lower.................... 441.5 4.8 (83.5) 18.2
6 In or near default............... 146.7 1.6 (10.8) 2.4
--------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal................... 9,120.7 100.0% (459.1) 100.0%
Redeemable preferred stock....... 207.6 (11.0)
--------------------------------------------------------------
Total............................ $9,328.3 $(470.1)
==============================================================
(1) With respect to securities that are awaiting rating, the Company has
assigned a rating based on an analysis that it believes is equivalent to
that used by the SVO.
(2) Comparisons between SVO and S&P ratings are published by the National
Association of Insurance Commissioners.
(3) Includes 58 securities with gross unrealized losses that are awaiting an
SVO rating with a carrying value of $1,763.4 million and unrealized losses
of $27.1 million. Due to lags between the funding of an investment, the
processing of final legal documents, the filing with the SVO, and the
rating by the SVO, there will always be a number of unrated securities at
each statement date. Unrated securities comprised 18.9% and 5.8% of the
total carrying value and total gross unrealized losses of securities in a
loss position, including redeemable preferred stock, respectively.
44
JOHN HANCOCK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Unrealized Losses on Fixed Maturity Securities --
By Investment Grade Category and Age
As of March 31, 2004
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Investment Grade Below Investment Grade
------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------
Carrying Value of Carrying Value of
Securities with Securities with
Gross Unrealized Hedging Market Gross Unrealized Hedging Market
Losses Adjustments Depreciation Losses Adjustments Depreciation
------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------
(in millions)
Three months or less ........................ $ 888.3 $ (6.9) $ (2.7) $ 152.2 $ (1.0) $ (1.1)
Greater than three months to six months .... 404.0 (6.4) (9.8) 100.1 (2.2) 0.8
Greater than six months to nine months ..... 596.3 (7.3) (1.4) 110.8 (1.8) (0.5)
Greater than nine months to twelve months .. 651.1 (1.7) (9.4) 89.6 (1.9) (5.8)
Greater than twelve months ................. 2,294.0 (56.2) (44.8) 1,732.7 (66.7) (121.3)
------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------
Subtotal ............................... 4,833.7 (78.5) (68.1) 2,185.4 (73.6) (127.9)
------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------
Redeemable preferred stock .................. 215.5 -- -- 24.4 -- --
------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------
Total .................................. $5,049.2 $ (78.5) $ (68.1) $2,209.8 $ (73.6) $ (127.9)
========================================== ==========================================
Unrealized Losses on Fixed Maturity Securities --
By Investment Grade Category and Age
As of December 31, 2003
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Investment Grade Below Investment Grade
------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------
Carrying Value of Carrying Value of
Securities with Securities with
Gross Unrealized Hedging Market Gross Unrealized Hedging Market
Losses Adjustments Depreciation Losses Adjustments Depreciation
------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------
(in millions)
Three months or less ........................ $ 1,793.1 $ (12.2) $ (15.6) $ 247.8 $ (3.8) $ (7.5)
Greater than three months to six
Months ................................. 1,385.2 (5.6) (27.0) 122.9 (1.8) (1.1)
Greater than six months to nine
Months ................................. 925.2 (1.0) (32.6) 122.1 (2.5) (10.8)
Greater than nine months to twelve
Months ................................. 207.4 (14.0) (7.7) 191.6 (1.2) (2.8)
Greater than twelve months ................. 2,488.9 (43.7) (40.5) 1,636.5 (60.1) (167.6)
------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------
Total .................................. 6,799.8 (76.5) (123.4) 2,320.9 (69.4) (189.8)
------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------
Redeemable Preferred Stock .................. 205.2 -- (10.4) 2.4 -- (0.6)
------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------
Total .................................. $ 7,005.0 $ (76.5) $ (133.8) $2,323.3 $ (69.4) $ (190.4)
========================================== =========================================
The tables above shows the Company's investment grade and below investment
grade securities that were in a loss position at March 31, 2004 and December 31,
2003 by the amount of time the security has been in a loss position. Gross
unrealized losses from hedging adjustments represent the amount of the
unrealized loss that results from the security being designated as a hedged item
in a fair value hedge. When a security is so designated, its cost basis is
adjusted in response to movements in interest rates. These adjustments, which
are non-cash and reverse with the passage of time as the asset and derivative
mature, impact the amount of unrealized loss on a security. The remaining
portion of the gross unrealized loss represents the impact of interest rates on
the non-hedged portion of the portfolio and unrealized losses due to
creditworthiness on the total fixed maturity portfolio.
As of March 31, 2004 and December 31, 2003, respectively, the fixed
maturity securities had a total gross unrealized loss of $196.0 million and
$324.2 million, excluding basis adjustments related to hedging relationships. Of
these totals, $181.3 million and $218.6 million, respectively, are due to
securities that have had various amounts of unrealized loss for more than nine
months. Of this, $54.2 million and $48.2 million, respectively comes from
securities rated investment grade. Unrealized losses on investment grade
securities principally relate to changes in interest rates or changes in credit
spreads since the securities were acquired. Credit rating agencies statistics
indicate that investment grade securities have been found to be less likely to
develop credit concerns.
45
JOHN HANCOCK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
As of March 31, 2004 and December 31, 2003, $127.1 million and $170.4
million, respectively, of the $196.0 million and $324.2 million resided in below
investment grade securities with various amounts of unrealized loss for over
nine months. At March 31, 2004, all of these securities are current as to the
payments of principal and interest. Of the total $127.1 million, $98.5 million
traded above 80% of amortized cost at March 31, 2004 and an additional $11.7
million traded above 80% of amortized cost within the last nine months, for a
total of $110.2 million. Of the total $110.2 million in this category, $60.6
million comes from airline related bonds, an industry that continues to
experience stress and hence has lagged the general recovery. While, as described
earlier, we expect the secured nature of our positions to protect our value, the
increased stress in this industry is of concern.
The Company's gross unrealized losses in investment grade and below
investment grade bonds trading at less than 80% of amortized cost for more than
one year amounted to $17.1 million in March 31, 2004 down $58.8 million, or
77.5%, from December 31, 2003.
The Company believes, however, that after its comprehensive review of each
borrower's ability to meet the obligations of the notes, and based on
information available at this time, these securities will continue to pay as
scheduled, and the Company has the ability and the intent to hold these
securities until they recover in value or matures. The scheduled maturity dates
for securities in an unrealized loss position at March 31, 2004 and December 31,
2003 is shown below.
Unrealized Losses on Fixed Maturity Securities -- By Maturity
March 31, 2004 December 31, 2003
----------------------------- -------------------------------
Carrying Value Carrying Value
of Securities Gross of Securities Gross
with Gross Unrealized with Gross Unrealized
Unrealized Loss Loss Unrealized Loss Loss
----------------------------- -------------------------------
(in millions)
Due in one year or less ..................... $ 306.4 $ (11.5) $ 385.1 $ (11.5)
Due after one year through five years ....... 1,127.4 (51.0) 1,487.0 (74.5)
Due after five years through ten years ...... 1,169.3 (71.3) 1,916.7 (101.8)
Due after ten years ......................... 3,112.5 (125.1) 3,404.8 (138.5)
----------------------------- -------------------------------
5,715.6 (258.9) 7,193.6 (326.3)
Asset-backed and mortgage-backed
Securities ................................ 1,543.4 (89.2) 2,134.7 (143.8)
----------------------------- -------------------------------
Total ....................................... $7,259.0 $ (348.1) $9,328.3 $ (470.1)
============================= ===============================
As of March 31, 2004, there were 22 securities representing 3 credits with
amortized cost of $408.8 million and total unrealized loss of $65.8 million that
had unrealized losses of $10 million or more. As of December 31, 2003, there
were 59 securities with an unrealized loss of $10 million or more with an
amortized cost of $1,048.3 million and unrealized loss of $136.3 million. The
area of most concern continues to be the airline sector and it represents 2 of
the 3 credits as of March 31, 2004.
Mortgage Loans. As of March 31, 2004 and December 31, 2003, the Company
held mortgage loans with a carrying value of $10.7 billion and $10.9 billion,
including $2.9 billion and $3.0 billion, respectively, of agricultural loans at
each period end and $7.8 billion and $7.9 billion, respectively, of commercial
loans. Impaired loans comprised 1.0% and 1.1% of the mortgage portfolio as of
March 31, 2004 and December 31, 2003, respectively.
The following table shows the Company's agricultural mortgage loan
portfolio by its three major sectors: agri-business, timber and production
agriculture.
46
JOHN HANCOCK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
As of March 31, 2004 As of December 31, 2003
------------------------------------------- -----------------------------------------
Amortized Carrying % of Total Amortized Carrying % of Total
Cost Value Carrying Value Cost Value Carrying Value
------------------------------------------- -----------------------------------------
(in millions)
Agri-business ........... $1,797.3 $1,796.6 61.3% $1,861.0 $1,860.6 61.5%
Timber .................. 1,146.4 1,118.0 38.1 1,172.4 1,144.2 37.9
Production agriculture .. 17.7 17.7 0.6 18.9 18.9 0.6
------------------------------------------- -----------------------------------------
Total ............... $2,961.4 $2,932.3 100.0% $3,052.3 $3,023.7 100.0%
=========================================== =========================================
The following table shows the distribution of our mortgage loan portfolio
by property type as of the dates indicated. Our commercial mortgage loan
portfolio consists primarily of non-recourse fixed-rate mortgages on fully, or
nearly fully, leased commercial properties.
Mortgage Loans - By Property Type
As of March 31, 2004 As of December 31, 2003
---------------------------------------------------------------
Carrying % of Carrying % of
Value Total Value Total
---------------------------------------------------------------
(in millions)
Apartment ......................... $ 1,422.2 13.3% $ 1,452.9 13.4%
Office Buildings .................. 2,307.3 21.5 2,448.4 22.5
Retail ............................ 2,140.4 20.0 2,083.6 19.2
Agricultural ...................... 2,932.3 27.3 3,023.7 27.8
Industrial ........................ 930.5 8.7 938.4 8.6
Hotels ............................ 434.5 4.0 435.9 4.0
Multi-Family ...................... 0.9 -- 0.9 --
Mixed Use ......................... 297.5 2.8 284.3 2.6
Other ............................. 256.7 2.4 203.0 1.9
---------------------------------------------------------------
Total ........................ $10,722.3 100.0% $10,871.1 100.0%
===============================================================
The following table shows the distribution of our mortgage loan portfolio
by geographical region, as defined by the American Council of Life Insurers
(ACLI).
Mortgage Loans -- By ACLI Region
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
As of March 31, 2004 As of December 31, 2003
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Number Carrying % of Carrying % of
Of Loans Value Total Value Total
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
(in millions)
East North Central ...... 140 $ 1,125.9 10.5% $ 1,117.8 10.3%
East South Central ...... 39 393.0 3.7 411.9 3.8
Middle Atlantic ......... 120 1,480.3 13.8 1,449.5 13.3
Mountain ................ 93 541.9 5.0 507.6 4.7
New England ............. 101 878.2 8.2 869.1 8.0
Pacific ................. 274 2,321.7 21.7 2,371.2 21.8
South Atlantic .......... 203 2,242.9 20.9 2,375.6 21.8
West North Central ...... 69 430.7 4.0 434.5 4.0
West South Central ...... 116 1,008.0 9.4 1,022.2 9.4
Canada .................. 10 299.7 2.8 311.7 2.9
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total .............. 1,165 $10,722.3 100.0% $10,871.1 100.0%
===========================================================================
The following table shows the carrying values of our mortgage loan
portfolio that are delinquent but not in foreclosure, delinquent and in
foreclosure, restructured and foreclosed. The table also shows the respective
ratios of these items to the total carrying value of our mortgage loan
portfolio. Mortgage loans are classified as delinquent when they are 60 days or
more past due as to the payment of interest or principal. Mortgage loans are
classified as restructured when they are in good standing, but the basic terms,
such as interest rate or maturity date, have been modified as a result of a
prior actual delinquency or an imminent delinquency. All foreclosure decisions
are based on a thorough assessment of the property's quality and location and
47
JOHN HANCOCK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
market conditions. The decision may also reflect a plan to invest additional
capital in a property to make tenant improvements or renovations to secure a
higher resale value at a later date. Following foreclosure, we rely on our real
estate investment group's ability to manage foreclosed real estate for eventual
return to investment real estate status or outright sale.
Mortgage Loan Comparisons
As of March 31, As of December 31,
2004 2003
--------------------------------------- -------------------------------------
Carrying % of Total Carrying % of Total
Value Mortgage Loans (1) Value Mortgage Loans (1)
--------------------------------------- -------------------------------------
(in millions)
Delinquent, not in foreclosure .............. -- -- $ 0.2 --
Delinquent, in foreclosure .................. $ 69.9 0.6% 92.7 0.8%
Restructured ................................ 83.5 0.8 87.8 0.8
Loans foreclosed during period .............. -- -- 23.9 0.2
Other loans with valuation allowance (2) .... -- -- 5.5 0.1
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total .................................... $153.4 1.4% $210.1 1.9%
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Valuation allowance ......................... $ 63.5 0.6% $ 65.9 0.6%
=============================================================================
(1) As of March 31, 2004 and December 31, 2003 the Company held mortgage loans
with a carrying value of $10.7 billion and $10.9 billion, respectively.
The valuation allowance is maintained at a level that is adequate enough
to absorb estimated probable credit losses. Management's periodic evaluation of
the adequacy of the allowance for losses is based on past experience, known and
inherent risks, adverse situations that may affect the borrower's ability to
repay (including the timing of future payments), the estimated value of the
underlying security, the general composition of the portfolio, current economic
conditions and other factors. This evaluation is inherently subjective and is
susceptible to significant changes and no assurance can be given that the
allowances taken will in fact be adequate to cover all losses or that additional
valuation allowances or asset write-downs will not be required in the future.
The valuation allowance for the mortgage loan portfolio was $63.5 million, or
0.6% of the carrying value of the portfolio as of March 31, 2004.
Investment Results
Net Investment Income. The following table summarizes the Company's investment
results for the periods indicated:
As of March 31,
2004 2003
--------------------------------------------
Yield Amount Yield Amount
--------------------------------------------
(in millions)
General account assets-excluding
Policy loans
Gross income...................... 6.13% $ 993.1 6.33% $ 954.4
Ending assets-excluding policy
loans (1)..................... 67,565.9 62,047.2
Policy loans
Gross income...................... 5.84% 29.4 6.13% 30.9
Ending assets..................... 2,014.2 2,018.7
Total gross income......... 6.12% 1,022.5 6.32% 985.3
Less: investment expenses.. (39.0) (52.2)
------------ -----------
Net investment income ..... 5.89% $ 983.5 5.99% $ 933.1
============ ===========
(1) Cash and cash equivalents are included in invested assets in the table
above for the purposes of calculating yields on income producing assets
for the Company.
48
JOHN HANCOCK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Net investment income increased $50.4 million from the comparable prior
year period. The increase was primarily the result of asset growth and lower
investment expenses. Overall, the yield for the three months ended March 31,
2004, net of investment expenses, on the general account portfolio decreased to
5.89% from 5.99% for the prior year. The lower portfolio yield was driven
primarily by the drop in short-term interest rates during the year, which
impacts floating rate investments, and lower yields on investment acquisitions.
In summary, the change in yields was driven by the following factors:
o As of March 31, 2004, the Company's asset portfolio had approximately $12
billion of floating-rate exposure (primarily LIBOR). This compares to the
same $12 billion level of exposure as of March 31, 2003. This exposure was
created mostly through interest rate swaps designed to match our
floating-rate liability portfolio. As of March 31, 2004, approximately 91%
of this floating rate exposure, excluding cash and short-term investments,
was directly offset by exposure to floating-rate liabilities. Most of the
remaining 9% of exposure is in floating rate assets acquired for their
relative value and is accounted for in the portfolio's interest rate risk
management plan. The impact was approximately 47 basis points this quarter
compared to 54 basis points a year ago.
o Certain of our tax-preferenced investments (lease residual management and
affordable housing limited partnerships) dilute the Company's net
portfolio yield on a pre-tax basis. For the three month period ended March
31, 2004, this dilutive effect was 9 basis points, compared to 8 basis
points in the comparable prior year period. However, adjusting for taxes,
these investments increased the Company's net income by $1.4 million for
the three month period ended March 31, 2004 compared to the three month
period ended March 31, 2003.
o The inflow of new cash for the three month period ending March 31, 2004
was invested at rates that were below the portfolio rate for the prior
year period. In addition, maturing assets rolling over into new
investments at rates less favorable than those available in 2003. These
two factors account for the majority of the remaining decline in portfolio
rates.
Partially offsetting the effects of these decreases to yields on
investments was an increase in invested assets and a reduction in investment
expenses. In the three month period ended March 31, 2004, average invested
assets increased $7,839.2 million, or 13.3%, from the prior year period. In
addition, investment expenses were reduced $13.2 million in the three month
period ended March 31, 2004 compared to the prior year. Included are reductions
in corporate complex expenses and in depreciation expenses associated with the
sale of the Company's home office real estate in the first quarter of 2003.
Net Realized Investment and Other Gain/(Loss)
The following table shows the Company's net realized investment and other
gains (losses) by asset class for the periods presented:
Gross Gain Gross Loss Hedging Net Realized Investment
For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2004 Impairment on Disposal on Disposal Adjustments and Other Gain/(Loss)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(in millions)
Fixed maturity securities (1) (2)....... $(68.3) $ 74.8 $ (5.4) $ (51.9) $ (50.8)
Equity securities (3)................... (4.7) 69.1 (0.7) -- 63.7
Mortgage loans on real estate........... -- 14.1 (3.7) (14.1) (3.7)
Real estate............................. -- 3.7 (0.1) -- 3.6
Other invested assets................... (7.4) 2.2 (6.1) -- (11.3)
Derivatives............................. -- -- -- (100.0) (100.0)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal................. $(80.4) $163.9 $(16.0) $(166.0) $ (98.5)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Amortization adjustment for deferred policy acquisition costs...................... $ 18.0
Amounts credited to participating pension contractholders.......................... (2.0)
Amounts credited to the policyholder dividend obligation........................... (15.2)
----------------------
Total......................................................................... $ (97.7)
======================
(1) Fixed maturities gain on disposals includes $5.4 million of gains from
previously impaired securities and prepayment gains of $33.4 million.
(2) Fixed maturities loss on disposals includes $0.6 million of credit related
losses.
(3) Equity securities gain on disposal includes $9.3 million of gains from
equity securities received as settlement compensation from an investee
whose securities had previously been impaired.
49
JOHN HANCOCK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
The hedging adjustments in the fixed maturities and mortgage loans asset
classes are non-cash adjustments representing the amortization or reversal of
prior fair value adjustments on assets in those classes that were or are
designated as hedged items in fair value hedge. When an asset or liability is so
designated, its cost basis is adjusted in response to movement in interest rate.
These adjustments are non-cash and reverse with the passage of time as the asset
or liability and derivative mature. The hedging adjustments on the derivatives
represent non-cash adjustments on derivative instruments and on assets and
liabilities designated as hedged items reflecting the change in fair value of
those items.
For the three months ended March 31, 2004 net realized investment and
other gains and losses was a loss of $97.7 million. For the same time periods,
gross losses on impairments and on disposal of investments - including bonds,
equities, real estate, mortgages and other invested assets was $96.4 million,
excluding hedging adjustments. This compares to net realized investment and
other gains of $105.4 million and gross losses on impairments and disposals of
$290.9 million in the year ago quarter.
For the three months ended March 31, 2004, we realized $74.8 million of
gains on disposal of fixed maturities excluding hedging adjustments. These gains
resulted from managing our portfolios for tax optimization and ongoing portfolio
positioning, as well as $33.4 million of prepayments and approximately $5.4
million from recoveries on sales of previously impaired securities.
For the three month ended March 31, 2004, we realized $5.4 million of
losses upon disposal of bonds excluding hedging adjustments. We generally intend
to hold securities in unrealized loss positions until they mature or recover.
However, we do sell bonds under certain circumstances such as when new
information causes us to change our assessment of whether a bond will recover or
perform according to its contractual terms, in response to external events (such
as a merger or a downgrade) that result in investment guideline violations (such
as single issuer or overall portfolio credit quality limits), in response to
extreme catastrophic events (such as September 11, 2001) that result in industry
or market wide disruption, or to take advantage of tender offers. Sales generate
both gains and losses.
The Company has a process in place to identify securities that could
potentially have an impairment that is other than temporary. This process
involves monitoring market events that could impact issuers' credit ratings,
business climate, management changes, litigation and government actions, and
other similar factors. This process also involves monitoring late payments,
downgrades by rating agencies, key financial ratios, financial statements,
revenue forecasts and cash flow projections as indicators of credit issues.
At the end of each quarter, our Investment Review Committee reviews all
securities where market value is less than ninety percent of amortized cost for
three months or more to determine whether impairments need to be taken. This
committee includes the head of workouts, the head of each industry team, the
head of portfolio management, the Chief Investment Officer and the Chief Risk
Officer who reports to the Chief Financial Officer. The analysis focuses on each
company's or project's ability to service its debts in a timely fashion and the
length of time the security has been trading below cost. The results of this
analysis are reviewed by the Life Company's Committee of Finance, a subcommittee
of the Life Company's Board of Directors, quarterly. This quarterly process
includes a fresh assessment of the credit quality of each investment in the
entire fixed maturities portfolio.
The Company considers relevant facts and circumstances in evaluating
whether the impairment of a security is other than temporary. Relevant facts and
circumstances considered include (1) the length of time the fair value has been
below cost; (2) the financial position of the issuer, including the current and
future impact of any specific events; and (3) the Company's ability and intent
to hold the security to maturity or until it recovers in value. To the extent
the Company determines that a security is deemed to be other than temporarily
impaired, the difference between amortized cost and fair value would be charged
to earnings.
There are a number of significant risks and uncertainties inherent in the
process of monitoring impairments and determining if an impairment is other than
temporary. These risks and uncertainties include (1) the risk that our
assessment of an issuer's ability to meet all of its contractual obligations
will change based on changes in the credit characteristics of that issuer, (2)
the risk that the economic outlook will be worse than expected or have more of
an impact on the issuer than anticipated, (3) fraudulent information could be
provided to our investment professionals who determine the fair value estimates
and other than temporary impairments, and (4) the risk that new information
obtained by us or changes in other facts and circumstances lead us to change our
intent to hold the security to maturity or until it recovers in value. Any of
these situations could result in a charge to earnings in a future period.
50
JOHN HANCOCK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
As disclosed in our discussion of the Results of Operations in this MD&A,
the Company recorded losses due to other than temporary impairments of fixed
maturity securities for three month period ended March 31, 2004 of $69.8 million
(including impairment losses of $68.3 million and $1.5 million of previously
recognized gains where the bond was part of a hedging relationship).
Of the $5.4 million of realized losses on sales of fixed maturity
securities for the three months ended March 31, 2004, there were no significant
credit losses. Most of the sales were related to general portfolio management,
largely due to redeploying high quality, liquid public bonds into more permanent
investments and the losses resulted from increasing interest rates during the
quarter. There were no sales with losses in excess of $1.0 million.
The Company recorded losses due to other than temporary impairments of CDO
equity and other invested assets of $7.4 million for three month period ended
March 31, 2004. Equity in these CDO's take the first loss risk in a pool of high
yield debt and hence under perform in a high yield default environment. We have
a total remaining carrying value of $57.4 million and $60.0 million of CDO
equity as of March 31, 2004 and December 31, 2003, which is currently supported
by expected cash flows.
The Company also recognized losses on other than temporary impairments of
common stock of $4.7 million for the three month period ended March 31, 2004, as
the result of market values falling below cost for more than six months.
The Company recorded a loss of $3.7 million on mortgage loans for the
three month period ended March 31, 2004 (of which $14.1 million was losses on
hedging adjustments). Included are losses of $1.2 million for the three months
ended March 31, 2004, which were associated with agriculture mortgages.
There were also gains of $69.1 million on the sale of equity securities as
part of our overall investment strategy of using equity gains to minimize credit
losses in the long term, gains of $2.2 million from the sale of other invested
assets, and gains of $3.7 million resulting from the sale of real estate for the
three month period ended March 31, 2004. Net derivative activity resulted in a
loss of $100.0 million for the three months ended March 31, 2004, resulting from
a slightly larger impact from interest rate changes on the Company's fair value
of hedged and non-hedged items in comparison to the changes in fair value of its
derivatives.
For the three month period ended March 31, 2003, net realized investment
and other gains and losses was a gain of $105.4 million. Gross losses on
impairments and on disposal of investments - including bonds, equities,
mortgages, real estate, and other invested assets was $290.9 million excluding
hedging adjustments.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Liquidity describes the ability of a company to generate sufficient cash
flows to meet the immediate capital needs to facilitate business operations. The
assets of the Company consist of a diversified investment portfolio and
investments in operating subsidiaries. The Company's cash flow consists
primarily of premiums, deposits, investment income, results of its operating
subsidiaries and proceeds from the Company's debt offerings offset by benefits
paid to contractholders, operating expenses, policyholder dividends to its
participating policyholders and shareholder dividends to it parent company. All
of the outstanding common stock of John Hancock Life Insurance Company is owned
by its Parent, an insurance holding company, John Hancock Financial Services,
Inc.
State insurance laws generally restrict the ability of insurance companies
to pay cash dividends in excess of prescribed limitations without prior
approval. The Company's limit is the greater of 10% of the statutory surplus at
prior year-end or the prior calendar year's statutory net gain from operations
of the Company. The ability of the Company to pay shareholder dividends is and
will continue to be subject to restrictions set forth in the insurance laws and
regulations of Massachusetts, its domiciliary state. The Massachusetts insurance
law limits how and when the Company can pay shareholder dividends. The Company,
in the future could also be viewed as being commercially domiciled in New York.
If so, dividend payments may also be subject to New York's holding company act
as well as Massachusetts' law. The Company currently does not expect such
regulatory requirements to impair its ability to meet its liquidity and capital
needs. During the first quarter of 2004, the Company paid no dividends to its
parent, JHFS.
Sources of cash for the Company include premiums, deposits and charges on
policies and contracts, investment income, maturing investments, and proceeds
from sales of investment assets. In addition to the need for cash flow to meet
operating expenses, our liquidity requirements relate principally to the
51
JOHN HANCOCK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
liabilities associated with various life insurance, annuity, and structured
investment products, and to the funding of investments in new products,
processes, and technologies. Product liabilities include the payment of benefits
under life insurance, annuity and structured investment products and the payment
of policy surrenders, withdrawals and policy loans. The Company periodically
adjusts its investment policy to respond to changes in short-term and long-term
cash requirements and provide adequate funds to pay benefits without forced
sales of investments.
On April 28, 2004, JHFS, the parent of the Company, completed its merger
agreement with Manulife Financial Corporation (Manulife) and as of the close of
business JHFS stock stopped trading on the New York Stock Exchange. In
accordance with the agreement, each share of JHFS common stock was converted
into 1.1853 shares of Manulife stock. Commencing on April 28, 2004, the Company
now operates as a subsidiary of Manulife and the John Hancock name is Manulife's
primary U.S. brand. Following the completion of the merger, Standard and Poor's,
Moody's, A.M. Best and Fitch affirmed all ratings. In addition, Standard &
Poor's upgraded the long-term counterparty credit and senior debt ratings on
John Hancock Financial Services, Inc. and the debt ratings John Hancock Canadian
Corp. to A+ from A. Dominion Bond Rating Service upgraded John Hancock Financial
Services' corporate rating to AA (low) from A (high).
The liquidity of our insurance operations is also related to the overall
quality of our investments. As of March 31, 2004, $43,676.0 million, or 87.5% of
the fixed maturity securities held by us and rated by Standard & Poor's Ratings
Services, (S&P) or the National Association of Insurance Commissioners were
rated investment grade (BBB- or higher by S&P, Baa3 or higher for Moody's, or 1
or 2 by the National Association of Insurance Commissioners). The remaining
$6,245.1 million, or 12.5%, of fixed maturity investments were rated
non-investment grade. For additional discussion of our investment portfolio see
the General Account Investments section of this Management's Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Segment Operations.
We employ an asset/liability management approach tailored to the specific
requirements of each of our product lines. Each product line has an investment
strategy based on the specific characteristics of the liabilities in the product
line. As part of this approach, we develop investment policies and operating
guidelines for each portfolio based upon the return objectives, risk tolerance,
liquidity, and tax and regulatory requirements of the underlying products and
business segments.
Analysis of Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows
Net cash provided by operating activities was $536.6 million and $566.5
million for the three month period ended March 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively.
Cash flows from operating activities are affected by the timing of premiums
received, fees received and investment income. The $29.9 million decrease in the
first quarter of 2004 as compared to the same period of 2003 is largely
attributable to lower premiums received and income taxes due, and higher
operating costs, partially offset by increased fee and other income and lower
policy expenditures.
Net cash used in investing activities was $760.0 million and $477.3
million for the three month periods ended March 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively.
Changes in the cash provided by investing activities primarily relate to the
management of the Company's investment portfolios and the investment of excess
capital generated by operating and financing activities. The $282.7 million
increase in cash used in the first quarter of 2004 as compared to the same
period in 2003 resulted primarily from an $887.6 million cash inflow from the
sale of Home Office properties in the first quarter of 2003, offset partially by
a $335.2 million reduction in net acquisitions of fixed maturities and a $336.0
million increase in net mortgage maturities, prepayments and scheduled
redemptions.
Net cash provided by financing activities was $24.4 million and $1,150.9
million for the three month periods ended March 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively.
Changes in cash provided by financing activities primarily relate to excess
deposits or withdrawals under investment type contracts, the issuance of debt
and borrowings or re-payments of the Company's debt. The $1,126.5 million
decrease in net cash provided by financing activities for the first quarter of
2004 as compared to the same period in 2003 was driven by a decrease in deposits
and an increase in cash payments made on withdrawals of universal life insurance
and investment-type contracts totaling $1,168.8 million. Withdrawals on such
universal life insurance and investment-type contracts exceeded deposits by
$211.7 million for the first quarter of 2004, while during the same period in
2003, deposits exceeded withdrawals by $957.1 million. The Company's ability to
generate customer deposits in excess of withdrawals is critical to our long-term
growth.
52
JOHN HANCOCK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Lines of Credit, Debt and Guarantees
Cash flow requirements are also supported by a committed line of credit of
$1.0 billion, through a syndication of banks including Fleet National Bank,
JPMorgan Chase, Citicorp USA, Inc., The Bank of New York, The Bank of Nova
Scotia, Fleet Securities, Inc. and JP Morgan Securities, Inc. The line of credit
agreement provides for two facilities: one for $500 million pursuant to a
364-day commitment (renewed effective July 25, 2003) and a second for $500
million (renewable in 2005). The line of credit is available for general
corporate purposes. The line of credit agreement contains various covenants,
among these being that statutory total capital and surplus plus asset valuation
reserve meet certain requirements. To date, we have not borrowed any amounts
under the line of credit.
As of March 31, 2004, we had $695.4 million of principal and interest
amounts of debt outstanding, consisting of $447.6 million of surplus notes and
$247.8 million of other notes payable, including current maturities and a fair
value adjustment for interest rate swaps. A new commercial paper program has
been established at JHFS that has replaced the commercial paper program that was
in place at the Company's indirect subsidiary, John Hancock Capital Corporation,
and there were no commercial paper borrowings outstanding at March 31, 2004.
The risk-based capital standards for life insurance companies, as
prescribed by the National Association of Insurance Commissioners, establish a
risk-based capital ratio comparing adjusted surplus to required surplus for each
of our United States domiciled insurance subsidiaries. If the risk-based capital
ratio falls outside of acceptable ranges, regulatory action may be taken ranging
from increased information requirements to mandatory control by the domiciliary
insurance department. The risk-based capital ratios are reported annually and
monitored continuously. The Company's risk-based capital ratios for all of our
insurance subsidiaries as of year end were significantly above the ranges that
would require regulatory action.
We maintain reinsurance programs designed to protect against large or
unusual losses. Based on our periodic review of our reinsurers' financial
statements, financial strength ratings and reputations in the reinsurance
marketplace, we believe that our reinsurers are financially sound, and,
therefore, that we have no significant exposure to uncollectible reinsurance in
excess of uncollectible amounts recognized in our consolidated financial
statements.
Off Balance Sheet Arrangements
The Company has relationships with a number of entities which are not
consolidated into the Company's consolidated financial statements. These
entities include qualified special purpose entities (QSPEs) and other special
purpose entities. In the course of some of its business the Company transfers
assets to, and in some cases, retains interests in QSPEs. The Company may also
purchase interests in QSPEs on the open market.
The Company's primary use of QSPEs arises in its commercial mortgage
banking subsidiary. The Company's commercial mortgage banking subsidiary
originates commercial mortgages and sells them to QSPEs which then issues
mortgage backed securities (MBS). The Company engages in this activity to earn
fees during the origination process, and to generate realized gains during the
securitization process. The Company may purchase MBS from the QSPEs created in
its commercial mortgage banking subsidiary to generate net investment income.
The majority of the Company's MBS portfolio was purchased from unrelated QSPEs.
Given the historical cash flow of our subsidiaries and current financial
results, management believes that the cash flow from the operating activities
over the next year will provide sufficient liquidity for our operations, as well
as to satisfy debt service obligations and to pay other operating expenses.
Although we anticipate that we will be able to meet our cash requirements, we
can give no assurances in this regard.
53
JOHN HANCOCK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Forward-Looking Statements
The statements, analyses, and other information contained in this
Management's Discussion and analysis (MD&A) and elsewhere in this Form 10-K, in
connection with the merger with John Hancock and Manulife Financial Corporation,
relating to trends in the John Hancock Life Insurance Company's (the Company's)
operations and financial results, the markets for the Company's products, the
future development of the Company's business, and the contingencies and
uncertainties to which the Company may be subject, as well as other statements
including words such as "anticipate," "believe," "plan," "estimate," "expect,"
"intend," "will," "should," "may," and other similar expressions, are
"forward-looking statements" under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act
of 1995. Such statements are made based upon management's current expectations
and beliefs concerning future events and their effects on the Company. Future
events and their effects on the Company may not be those anticipated by
management. The Company's actual results may differ materially from the results
anticipated in these forward-looking statements.
These forward-looking statements are subject to risks and uncertainties
including, but not limited to, the risks that (1) a significant downgrade in our
ratings for claims-paying ability and financial strength may lead to policy and
contract withdrawals and materially harm our ability to market our products; (2)
new laws and regulations, including the recently enacted Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, or changes to existing laws or regulations, (including, but not limited
to, those relating to the Federal Estate Tax Laws and the proposed Bush
Administration tax and savings initiatives), and the applications and
interpretations given to these laws and regulations, may adversely affect the
Company's sales of insurance and investment advisory products; (3) Massachusetts
insurance law may restrict the ability of John Hancock Variable Life Insurance
Company to pay dividends to us; (4) we face increasing competition in our retail
businesses from mutual fund companies, banks and investment management firms as
well as from other insurance companies; (5) declines or increased volatility in
the securities markets, and other economic factors, may adversely affect our
business, particularly our variable life insurance, mutual fund, variable
annuity and investment business; (6) due to acts of terrorism or other
hostilities, there could be business disruption, economic contraction, increased
mortality, morbidity and liability risks, generally, or investment losses that
could adversely affect our business; (7) our life insurance sales are highly
dependent on a third party distribution relationship; (8) customers may not be
responsive to new or existing products or distribution channels, (9) interest
rate volatility may adversely affect our profitability; (10) our net income and
revenues will suffer if customers surrender annuities and variable and universal
life insurance policies or redeem shares of our open-end mutual funds; (11) the
independent trustees of our variable series trusts and of our mutual funds could
reduce the compensation paid to us or could terminate our contracts to manage
the funds; (12) under our Plan of Reorganization, we were required to establish
the closed block, a special arrangement for the benefit of a group of our
policyholders. We may have to fund deficiencies in our closed block, and any
over-funding of the closed block will benefit only the holders of policies
included in the closed block, not our sole shareholder; (13) we face investment
and credit losses relating to our investment portfolio, including, without
limitation, the risk associated with the evaluation and determination by our
investment professionals of the fair values of investments as well as whether or
not any investments have been impaired on an other than temporary basis; (14) we
may experience volatility in net income due to changes in standards for
accounting for derivatives and other changes; (15) we are subject to risk-based
capital requirements and possible guaranty fund assessments; (16) we may be
unable to retain personnel who are key to our business; (17) we may incur losses
from assumed reinsurance business in respect of personal accident insurance and
the occupational accident component of workers compensation insurance; (18)
litigation and regulatory proceedings may result in financial losses, harm our
reputation and divert management resources; (19) we face unforeseen liabilities
arising from our acquisitions and dispositions of businesses; (20) we may incur
multiple life insurance claims as a result of a catastrophic event which,
because of higher deductibles and lower limits under our reinsurance
arrangements, could adversely affect the Company's future net income and
financial position, and (21) in connection with the merger between JHFS and
Manulife Financial Corporation: we may not achieve the revenue synergies, cost
savings and other synergies contemplated by the merger; we may experience
litigation related to the merger; John Hancock's and Manulife's distributors,
customers and policyholders may react negatively to the transaction; we may
encounter difficulties in promptly and effectively integrating the businesses of
John Hancock and Manulife; we may not be able to retain the professional and
management talent necessary to operate the business; the transaction may result
in diversion of management time on merger- and intergration-related issues; and
we may experience increased exposure to exchange rate fluctuations and other
unknown risks associated with the merger.
Readers are also directed to other risks and uncertainties discussed, as
well as to further discussion of the risks described above, in other documents
that may be filed by the Company with the United States Securities and Exchange
Commission from time to time. The Company specifically disclaims any obligation
to update or revise any forward-looking information, whether as a result of new
information, future developments, or otherwise.
54
JOHN HANCOCK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE and QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Omitted pursuant to General Instruction H(1)(a) and (b) of Form 10-Q.
ITEM 4. CONTROLS and PROCEDURES
An evaluation was carried out under the supervision and with the
participation of the Company's management, including its Chief Executive Officer
and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended). Based on that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer concluded that the disclosure controls and procedures were
effective as of the end of the period covered by this report.
No change in the Company's internal control over financial reporting (as
defined in Rule 14-15f) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended)
occurred during the period covered by this report that has materially affected,
or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company's internal control
over financial reporting.
PART II - OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS and REPORTS on FORM 8-K
a) Exhibits
Exhibit
Number Description
- ------ -----------
31.1 Chief Executive Officer Certification Pursuant to Rules 13a-14
and 15d-14 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 **
31.2 Chief Financial Officer Certification Pursuant to Rules 13a-14
and 15d-14 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 **
32.1 Chief Executive Officer certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 **
32.2 Chief Financial Officer certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 **
================================================================================
** Filed herewith.
55
JOHN HANCOCK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
b) Reports on Form 8-K.
During the First Quarter of 2004 the Company filed the following Current Reports
on Form 8-K:
On January 27, 2004 the Company filed a Current Report on Form 8-K, dated
January 26, 2004, filing under Item 5 thereof, certain exhibits in connection
with a Registration Statement on Form S-3 covering the Company's SignatureNotes
Medium Term Note Program.
On January 28, 2004 the Company filed an amended Current Report on Form 8-K/A,
dated January 26, 2004, filing under Item 5 thereof, certain exhibits in
connection with a Registration Statement on Form S-3 covering the Company's
SignatureNotes Medium Term Note Program
On February 3, 2004 the Company filed a Current Report on Form 8-K, dated
February 2, 2004, filing under Item 5 thereof, certain exhibits in connection
with a Registration Statement on Form S-3 covering the Company's SignatureNotes
Medium Term Note Program.
On February 6, 2004 the Company filed a Current Report on Form 8-K, dated
February 5, 2004, reporting under item 12 thereof the fourth quarter 2003
operating and financial results of its parent - John Hancock Financial Services,
Inc.
On February 10, 2004 the Company filed a Current Report on Form 8-K, dated
February 9, 2004, filing under Item 5 thereof, certain exhibits in connection
with a Registration Statement on Form S-3 covering the Company's SignatureNotes
Medium Term Note Program.
On March 16, 2004 the Company filed a Current Report on Form 8-K, dated March
15, 2004, filing under Item 5 thereof, certain exhibits in connection with a
Registration Statement on Form S-3 covering the Company's SignatureNotes Medium
Term Note Program.
On March 23, 2004 the Company filed a Current Report on Form 8-K, dated March
22, 2004, filing under Item 5 thereof, certain exhibits in connection with a
Registration Statement on Form S-3 covering the Company's SignatureNotes Medium
Term Note Program.
On March 30, 2004 the Company filed a Current Report on Form 8-K, dated March
29, 2004, filing under Item 5 thereof, certain exhibits in connection with a
Registration Statement on Form S-3 covering the Company's SignatureNotes Medium
Term Note Program.
56
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its
behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
JOHN HANCOCK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Date: May 6, 2004 By: /s/ THOMAS E. MOLONEY
----------------------
Thomas E. Moloney
Senior Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer