================================================================================
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
---------
FORM 10-K
|X| ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
ACT OF 1934
FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED
DECEMBER 31, 2003
COMMISSION FILE NO. 1-15607
-----------------
JOHN HANCOCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
-----------------
DELAWARE 04-3483032
(State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization) Identification No.)
John Hancock Place
Post Office Box 111
Boston, Massachusetts 02117
(617) 572-6000
(Address, including zip code, and telephone
number, including area code, of Registrant's principal executive offices)
SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(b) OF THE ACT:
Title of each class Name of each exchange on which registered
Common Stock, $0.01 par value New York Stock Exchange, Inc.
Series A Junior Preferred New York Stock Exchange, Inc.
Stock purchase rights
SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(g) OF THE ACT:
NONE
-----------------
(Title of class)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports
required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such
filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes |X| No |_|
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item
405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the
best of the registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information
statements incorporated by reference in Part III of the December 31, 2003 John
Hancock Financial Services, Inc. Form 10-K or any amendment to the December 31,
2003 John Hancock Financial Services, Inc. Form 10-K |X|.
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as
defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes |X| No |_|
The aggregate market value of the shares of the registrant's common equity
held by non-affiliates, computed by reference to the price at which the common
equity was last sold, as of the last business day of the registrant's most
recently completed second fiscal quarter, was $8,884,441,291
As of February 27, 2004, there were outstanding 293,315,942 shares of
Common Stock, $0.01 par value per share of the registrant.
Documents Incorporated by Reference
None
================================================================================
JOHN HANCOCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
CONTENTS
NON-GAAP FINANCIAL MEASURES............................................... 3
PART I ....................................................................... 3
ITEM 1. BUSINESS OF JOHN HANCOCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC................. 3
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES.......................................................40
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS................................................41
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS..............41
PART II.......................................................................42
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR JOHN HANCOCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC. COMMON
STOCK AND RELATED SHAREHOLDER MATTERS..........................42
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA..........................................42
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS......................................46
ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK......113
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA.....................117
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING
AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE......................................203
ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES.........................................203
PART III.....................................................................204
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF JOHN HANCOCK FINANCIAL
SERVICES, INC.................................................204
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION..........................................206
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT..216
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS..................218
ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES..........................218
PART IV .....................................................................219
ITEM 15. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, SCHEDULES AND REPORTS ON
FORM 8-K......................................................219
JOHN HANCOCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
Non-GAAP Financial Measures
A non-GAAP financial measure is a numerical measure of a company's
performance, financial position, or cash-flows that excludes (includes) amounts
that are not normally excluded (included) in the most directly comparable
measure calculated and presented in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles (GAAP) in the United States.
In this report we use a non-GAAP financial measure called "total segment
after tax operating income" in our discussion of Results of Operations by
Segment. Refer to see "Adjustments to GAAP Reported Net Income" in this report
or Note 14--Segment Information, for a description of total segment after tax
operating income and a reconciliation of that measure to net income.
We also use a variety of other measures in this report that we do not
consider non-GAAP financial measures because they do not have GAAP counterparts
and are operational measures rather than measures of performance, financial
position, or cash flows. Two examples of these measures are Sales and Assets
Under Management. Sales represent a measure, defined by the Life Insurance
Marketing Research Association (LIMRA), of the amount of new business we have
sold during the period rather than a measure of revenue. Assets Under Management
is an industry measure of a base upon which fee revenue is earned, which is
composed of both assets owned and assets managed for third parties.
PART I
Item 1. Business of John Hancock Financial Services, Inc.
John Hancock Financial Services, Inc. (John Hancock, JHFS or the Company)
is one of the nation's leading financial services companies, providing a broad
array of insurance and investment products and services to retail and
institutional customers, primarily in North America. Our principal executive
offices are located at John Hancock Place, Boston, Massachusetts 02117. Our
corporate internet address is www.jhancock.com.
The Board of Directors of John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance Company,
founded in 1862, unanimously adopted a Plan of Reorganization effective February
1, 2000 and John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance Company converted from a mutual
life insurance company to a stock life insurance company, John Hancock Life
Insurance Company (the Life Company), and became a wholly-owned subsidiary of
John Hancock Financial Services, Inc., a holding company. Also on February 1,
2000, John Hancock Financial Services, Inc. completed an initial public offering
of 102,000,000 shares of its common stock, par value $0.01 per share.
On September 28, 2003, the Company entered into a definitive merger
agreement with Manulife Financial Corporation (Manulife) which is expected to
close early in the second quarter of 2004. In accordance with the agreement,
each share of JHFS common stock will, at the time of the merger, be converted
into the right to receive 1.1853 shares of Manulife stock. It is estimated that
the shares of Manulife common stock to be issued to JHFS shareholders in the
merger will represent approximately 42.6% of the outstanding Manulife common
stock after the merger. The merger has been approved by the Company's
shareholders but the closing remains subject to certain conditions, including
the approval by certain U.S. and Canadian regulatory authorities. Until the
merger occurs, the Company will continue to operate independently of Manulife.
Thereafter, the Company will operate as a subsidiary of Manulife. The John
Hancock name will be Manulife's primary U.S. brand. This Annual Report on Form
10-K does not reflect or assume any changes to JHFS' business which may occur as
a result of the proposed merger with Manulife. For additional information, refer
to relevant John Hancock and other related public filings with the U.S. SEC
relating to the merger.
We operate our business in six segments. Two segments serve primarily
retail customers, two segments serve primarily institutional customers, and one
segment serves primarily Canadian retail and group customers. Our sixth segment
is the Corporate and Other Segment.
Our retail segments are the Protection Segment and the Asset Gathering
Segment. The Protection Segment offers variable life, universal life, whole
life, term life, individual and group long-term care insurance products and the
Federal long-term care insurance business. The Asset Gathering Segment offers
variable and fixed, deferred and immediate annuities, and mutual funds. Our
retail business also includes our retail distribution and customer service
operations.
Based on LIMRA sales data, which ranks participants within the United
States, as of September 30, 2003, John Hancock is the twelfth largest writer of
individual life insurance, the ninth largest writer of individual variable
universal life insurance and the tenth largest writer of individual universal
life insurance. John Hancock is the second largest writer of individual
long-term care insurance and the largest provider of long-term care insurance in
the employer sponsored group market based on inforce premium. John Hancock is
the twenty-first largest writer of individual annuity contracts.
3
JOHN HANCOCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
Our mutual fund subsidiary ranked 19th among non-proprietary broker-sold
U.S. asset managers in terms of total long-term, open-end assets under
management as of December 31, 2003.
Our institutional segments are the Guaranteed and Structured Financial
Products Segment and the Investment Management Segment. The Guaranteed and
Structured Financial Products Segment offers a wide variety of spread-based and
fee-based investment products and services. The spread-based products provide
the customer with some form of guaranteed return. The Investment Management
Segment consists of investment management services and products marketed to
institutions. This business is primarily fee-based and investment management
products generally do not offer guarantees.
In the first quarter of 2003, the Company implemented organizational
changes within the Corporate and Other Segment which resulted in the break-out
of the Maritime Life business as its own operating segment and the
reclassification of 2002 results for the Federal long-term care insurance
business to the Protection Segment. The Maritime Life Segment consists of our
consolidated Canadian operations, principally those of our Canadian life
insurance business, The Maritime Life Assurance Company (Maritime Life). The
discussion of segments set forth below presents the results of our segments on a
basis consistent with the new organization structure. The reclassifications
associated with the realignment of our operating segments had no impact in the
aggregate on segment after-tax operating income, or net income of the Maritime
Life, or Corporate and Other Segments, other than to display these businesses
separately. The reclassification associated with the Federal long-term care
insurance business has no impact on segment after-tax operating income, or net
income of the business. In addition, the organization transferred the operations
of First Signature Bank from the Asset Gathering Segment to the G&SFP Segment to
execute the brokered certificate of deposit business strategy.
Our Corporate and Other Segment consists of our remaining international
operations, primarily International Group Program, our corporate operations and
non-core businesses that are either in the process of winding down (i.e., are in
"run-off") or have been divested. During 2003, we sold our group life insurance
business effective May 1, 2003.
As of December 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively, our total assets under
management were $142.5 billion and $127.6 billion, which includes $29.3 billion
and $25.8 billion, respectively, of assets invested in the Company's retail
mutual funds. Total shareholders' equity, excluding net unrealized capital gains
on securities, was $6.6 billion and $5.8 billion as of December 31, 2003 and
2002, respectively. In addition, John Hancock generated $10.1 billion and $8.5
billion in revenues and $806.0 million and $499.5 million in net income in 2003
and 2002, respectively. The Company's net income represents a return on average
shareholders' equity, excluding net unrealized capital gains on securities, of
13.0% and 8.8% at December 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively. In 2003, the Company
adopted a new accounting pronouncement which resulted in a charge to earnings of
$166.2 million, refer to Note 1--Summary of Significant Accounting Policies for
a description of this cumulative effect of accounting change.
4
JOHN HANCOCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
Protection Segment
Overview
Through our Protection Segment, we offer a variety of non-traditional and
traditional life insurance products and individual and group long-term care
insurance products. Our non-traditional life insurance products include variable
life and universal life insurance. Our traditional life insurance products
include whole life insurance and term life insurance.
The Protection Segment has traditionally been our largest business
segment, contributing 38.6%, 40.2% and 36.2% of consolidated operating revenues
and 37.0%, 37.3% and 37.1% of consolidated segment after-tax operating income in
the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively. The Protection
Segment generated revenues of $3,882.7 million, $3,595.7 million and $3,385.1
million and segment after-tax operating income of $351.5 million, $308.5 million
and $298.7 million in 2003, 2002, and 2001, respectively. The Protection Segment
has achieved the following financial results for the periods indicated:
As of or for the Years
Ended December 31,
---------------------------------
2003 2002 2001
---- ---- ----
(in millions)
Sales (new premiums and deposits)(1):
Non-traditional life--excluding COLI and BOLI(2)
Variable life ............................ $ 53.0 $ 116.0 $ 124.5
Universal life ........................... 87.9 65.2 30.4
Traditional life--excluding COLI(2)
Whole life ............................... 7.9 5.8 6.1
Term life ................................ 36.4 39.3 33.0
COLI and BOLI
Variable life--COLI ...................... 38.3 66.6 90.5
Universal life--COLI ..................... 27.8 23.1 22.1
Universal life--BOLI ..................... 19.3 16.3 12.2
Individual long-term care ......................... 197.8 132.5 102.2
Group long-term care .............................. 18.3 16.6 16.8
Federal long-term care ............................ 83.3 52.8 --
---------------------------------
Total ............................ $ 570.0 $ 534.2 $ 437.8
=================================
Assets:
Non-traditional life .............................. $14,259.6 $12,158.0 $11,163.2
Traditional life .................................. 15,319.9 14,810.5 14,190.4
Individual long-term care ......................... 4,975.1 3,481.2 2,519.0
Group long-term care .............................. 950.3 776.9 580.8
Federal long-term care ............................ 172.1 30.3 --
Other ............................................. 56.6 44.9 51.6
---------------------------------
Total ............................ $35,733.6 $31,301.8 $28,505.0
=================================
- ----------
(1) Sales represent a measure, defined by LIMRA, of the amount of new business
we have sold during the period rather than a measure of revenue.
(2) Individual life insurance sales exclude (a) excess premiums, which are
premiums that build cash value but do not purchase face amounts of
insurance on variable life and universal life insurance products and (b)
premiums on corporate owned life insurance (COLI) and bank owned life
insurance (BOLI) policies covering more than 200 lives. Sales include 10%
of single premium payments on universal and whole life insurance products.
5
JOHN HANCOCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
Products and Markets
The attractive demographics of an aging population are a key growth driver
for our industry. The boomer generation is healthier, wealthier, and living
longer. They need products to manage wealth, provide a stream of income, provide
protection and manage longevity risk. John Hancock provides an array of life
insurance solutions to meet consumer's needs, from pure protection to
retirement, estate planning, and small business plans.
Our products are marketed through a variety of distribution channels. The
success of this product marketing is contingent upon the successful selling
efforts of career agents insurance brokers, financial consultants and other
distributors of our financial services. We refer to these individuals
collectively as "producers", since it is their ability to secure new life
insurance, annuity, and long-term care insurance contracts--as well as retain
existing contracts--that produces sales, continued revenue flows, and earnings
that sustain the continued profitability of our company. Providing outstanding
service to our producers is a primary focus. We continually develop tools and
processes to make it "easy to do business with John Hancock". We were the first
to introduce a web-based illustration and inforce management system, called
eHansel, that helps producers make new business proposals and manage their
current clients. At introduction, this system supported only life sales. Today,
we also support long-term care and annuity sales. We are constantly making
enhancements to this system, such as adding advanced online presentations that
instantly creates customized illustrations and sales presentations to facilitate
the sales process for producers. To support advanced sales in the life market,
we have an Estate and Business Planning Group that is a multidisciplinary team
made up of professionals with varied backgrounds in law, taxation, insurance,
finance and investments. This group provides differentiated support services to
John Hancock agents and independent brokers, and their clients' attorneys and
accountants.
The sales and other financial results of our retail business over the last
several years have been affected by general economic and industry trends. The
appreciation of equity markets in the 1990's resulted in variable life insurance
products accounting for the majority of increases in total life insurance
premiums and deposits for the insurance industry. This trend reversed in
2001-2003 due to declines in equity market performance through most of the three
year period and we have seen investors return to stable investment products.
Sales of variable life products have been declining while sales of universal
life insurance, term life insurance and corporate life insurance have increased.
However, we did see the beginning of a slight recovery in variable life product
sales towards the end of 2003. With respect to our long-term care insurance
products, premiums have increased due to the aging of the population and the
expected inability of government entitlement programs to meet retirement needs.
With a diversified and competitive portfolio of both fixed and variable
products, and comprehensive sales support tools for producers, we have been able
to serve our customers in all market conditions, and generate strong business
and earnings growth. The Company's sales of individual life insurance in 2003
consisted of 33.7% variable life, 49.9% universal life and 16.4% traditional
life. The Company's sales of individual life insurance (excluding COLI and BOLI)
in 2003 consisted of 28.6% variable life, 47.5% universal life and 23.9%
traditional life. Term life sales represented 82.2% of traditional life product
sales for the year ended December 31, 2003.
Individual Life Insurance
Variable Life Insurance. We were among the first insurance companies to
offer variable life insurance products, beginning in 1980. Variable universal
life insurance is our primary variable life insurance product, and we believe
the length of our experience in this market is a competitive strength. Variable
life provides life insurance coverage and an investment return linked to an
underlying portfolio of investments chosen by the policyholder.
Our core variable life products, Medallion EDGE and PLUS, offer an
attractive combination of insurance protection features and investment option
selections for clients who can accept a level of market risk, providing design
flexibility for both death benefit and investment objectives. Medallion Edge II,
our newest variable universal life product, continues our tradition of designing
and delivering enhanced variable life products, and provides competitive rates
for qualified applicants as well as expanded risk classes and disability rider
options.
In 2001, we introduced an optional benefit rider that adds a long-term
care insurance feature to variable life insurance policies. Called LifeCare
Benefit, this rider, when used with life insurance, helps clients meet not only
income protection and supplemental retirement funding needs, but long-term care
needs as well. Clients can use all, some, or none of their life insurance death
benefit to pay for long-term care - giving them cost effective, convenient,
long-term care protection. This rider is available on single life VL and UL
products, and is a distinguishing feature of our product line.
Our variable life insurance product portfolio includes joint
(second-to-die) and corporate owned life insurance products, as well as single
life policies. Second-to-die products are typically used for estate planning
purposes and insure two lives rather than
6
JOHN HANCOCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
one, with the policy proceeds paid after the death of both insured individuals.
Corporate owned life insurance products are sold to corporations for a variety
of reasons, including, to fund special deferred compensation plans and benefit
programs for key employees.
Universal Life Insurance. Our universal life insurance products meet a
range of needs, from providing pure, low cost life insurance coverage to
products with strong accumulation and income options. The life insurance
coverage and cash value that increases based on a credited interest rate which
is periodically reset. These policies generally permit policyholders to use any
increase in cash value to vary the amount of insurance coverage and the timing
and amount of premium payments. Ideal for the unstable market environment,
universal products offer clients insurance protection and cash accumulation
without exposure to market volatility. In 2003, we made major enhancements and
additions to our universal life insurance portfolio. We re-priced our core lapse
protection universal life product, called Protection UL, to make it very price
competitive and provide death benefit guarantee options. We also launched
Protection Survivorship UL, a survivorship product designed to offer both
flexibility and affordability in covering two clients, with competitive rates,
death benefit guarantee flexibility and more risk classes. Finally, we made
enhancements to our current assumption universal life product, called
Performance UL Core. This product performs exceptionally well in terms of
pricing and offers a choice of disability riders and the LifeCare benefit rider.
Our universal life insurance product portfolio also includes corporate
owned life insurance and bank owned life insurance products which are sold to
corporations including banks to fund post-retirement employee benefit plan
liabilities. We participate in both the corporate and bank owned life insurance
markets selectively, as profitable sales opportunities arise. In 2003, we
launched a new product called Performance Executive UL, a flexible premium
universal life solution for small businesses. This product offers features and
benefits for both multi-life and individual cases.
Traditional Life Insurance Products. Our traditional life insurance
products include single life and joint life (second-to-die) whole life
insurance, and term life insurance. Participating whole life insurance combines
a death benefit with a cash value that generally increases gradually in amount
over a period of years, and typically pays a policy dividend. Term life
insurance provides only a death benefit, does not build up cash value, and does
not pay a dividend.
Long-Term Care Insurance
We entered the individual long-term care (LTC) insurance market in 1987
and the group long-term care insurance market in 1988 and acquired the long-term
care insurance business of Fortis, Inc. (Fortis) in March 2000. Our long-term
care insurance products provide protection against the large and escalating
costs of home health care, assisted living, and nursing home care. With the
aging population, the expected inability of government entitlement programs to
meet retirement long-term care needs, and a growing public awareness of
long-term care insurance, we believe there is excellent growth potential for the
long-term care insurance market. Our long-term care insurance products are
reimbursement products, which provide benefits only for documented nursing home,
assisted living or home or health care expenses. These products are sold on a
guaranteed renewable basis, meaning that we are required to renew the policies
each year as long as the premium is paid. However, this also gives us the
ability to reset the price of the product prospectively, if needed.
o Individual Long-Term Care Insurance. Our individual long-term care
insurance products are sold mainly to pre-retired and retired
individuals and couples. The insured typically pays the premium for
this product. In 2002, we launched two new long-term care insurance
products, Essential Care and Custom Care. Custom Care was the first
long-term care insurance policy with a benefit that allows up to
four extended family members to be covered by the same policy. In
2003, building on the success of Custom Care and Essential Care, we
developed the second series of the Custom Care product line: Custom
Care II, Essential Care II and the FamilyCare II Benefit. Along with
many of the same features and options of the original series, Custom
Care II features two new built-in benefits designed for our younger
audiences: the Double Accident Benefit and the Return of Premium
Benefit. The Double Accident Benefit doubles coverage for people
under 65 who need long-term care due to an accident. The built-in
Return of Premium Benefit returns premiums (less claims) to those
policyholders who die before the age of 65. The Custom Care II
product also offers new inflation options and a new Extended Return
of Premium optional rider.
o Group Long-Term Care Insurance. Our group long-term care insurance
products are sold through employer-sponsored plans to employees and
retirees, and their eligible relatives. The insured, not the
employer, generally pays the premium for this insurance although
there is a growing trend among employers to purchase a "core" plan
on behalf of their employees, with the option for those employees to
"buy up" for additional amounts of coverage. Following selection of
one of our plans by an employer, we market our products directly to
the employee base. The principal market for our group long-term care
insurance products is companies with over 4,000 employees and
retirees. We also pursue smaller employers with 1,000 or more
employees and retirees in selected industries. In 2002, we
introduced a
7
JOHN HANCOCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
next-generation group long-term care insurance product, CareCHOICE,
with new features and enhanced benefits. This product provides
employers more choice in customizing a plan for their employees.
o Federal Long-Term Care Insurance. In 2002, we completed the rollout
of the new Federal Long-term Care Insurance Program (the program)
which John Hancock and MetLife were jointly awarded at the end of
2001. The program is expected to be the largest long-term care
insurance program in the country and the government's decision to
provide access to long-term care insurance to Federal government
employees is expected to increase awareness of the product among
consumers and employers. John Hancock and MetLife joined together to
form Long-Term Care Partners, LLC to administer the plan and support
a successful enrollment program. As of December 31, 2003, the
program generated approximately 217,000 policies after underwriting,
representing approximately $268 million in annualized premium. The
plan first became effective October 1, 2002.
The following table demonstrates total statutory premiums and deposits,
which is the premium we report on the annual statements we file with insurance
regulators, life insurance in force and GAAP reserves for our individual life
and long-term care insurance products. In addition to premium from sales of new
life and long-term care insurance policies, which we refer to as "sales,"
statutory premiums and deposits includes revenues from renewals of policies, 10%
of single premium payments, and premiums from reinsurance assumed by us. We
deduct from this measure the premiums that we cede to our reinsurers.
Selected Financial Data
Individual Life and Long-Term Care Insurance
As of or for the Years Ended December 31,
-----------------------------------------
2003 2002 2001
---- ---- ----
(in millions)
Total statutory premiums and deposits:
Variable life ........................... $ 789.0 $ 926.8 $ 948.5
Universal life(1)(2) .................... 530.4 1,130.9 456.1
Traditional life ........................ 968.7 1,035.9 997.3
Individual long-term care ............... 828.2 661.4 562.6
Group long-term care .................... 123.2 109.9 98.9
Federal long-term care .................. 122.9 15.1 --
-----------------------------------------
Total .......................... $ 3,362.4 $ 3,880.0 $ 3,063.4
=========================================
Life insurance in force:
Variable life ........................... 53,535.2 $ 57,331.8 $ 58,104.4
Universal life(2) ....................... 16,847.1 13,926.1 10,604.5
Traditional life ........................ 72,604.4 73,335.7 71,166.0
-----------------------------------------
Total .......................... $142,986.7 $144,593.6 $139,874.9
=========================================
GAAP reserves:
Variable life ........................... $ 7,005.5 $ 5,809.2 $ 6,479.9
Universal life(2) ....................... 4,531.0 3,949.6 2,758.1
Traditional life ........................ 12,790.9 12,421.7 10,632.2
Individual long-term care ............... 2,828.2 2,202.0 1,717.2
Group long-term care .................... 663.8 559.4 474.8
Federal long-term care .................. 114.3 9.5 --
-----------------------------------------
Total .......................... $ 27,933.7 $ 24,951.4 $ 22,062.2
=========================================
- ----------
(1) Includes bank owned life insurance premiums of $100.0 million and $200.0
million for the years ended December 31, 2002 and 2001 with an affiliated
party. No such transactions took place in 2003.
(2) Includes $639.7 million in deposits, $5,651.3 million in life insurance in
force (gross of reinsurance of $4,973.0 million) and $649.8 million in
GAAP reserves for the year ended December 31, 2002 related to the
acquisition of Allmerica's fixed universal life insurance business as of
December 31, 2002.
8
JOHN HANCOCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
Distribution
Protection products are distributed through multiple distribution channels
including Signator, M Financial Group, Essex, Banks, the Internet, and through
Group and private label relationships. Our strategy is to provide competitive
products and outstanding service through multiple distribution channels.
Signator. Signator, created in 1999, is a separate distribution
subsidiary. The Signator channel is comprised of Career Agents and Signator
Brokerage, Direct Brokerage and Broker/Dealers.
The Signator Career Agency system includes approximately 1,650 career
sales personnel. We have transitioned our Career Agents to financial advisors by
providing them with highly tailored financial planning tools and market support,
as well as an open architecture system which enables them to sell other
companies' products. This structure has enabled us to recruit, develop and
retain top producers.
Because we believe the biggest growth opportunity exists in the brokerage
arena, we have made significant strides to expand into this marketplace. The
brokerage channel distributes life and long-term care insurance products through
producer groups, brokerage general agencies, independent broker dealers, wire
houses and banks. The John Hancock Direct Brokerage unit has an external
wholesaling unit, internal wholesaling unit, account executive and marketing
team of its own that grows and manages relationships to drive sales. We focus on
relationships with firms that produce in excess of one million dollars in target
premium per year.
M Financial Group. M Financial Group is a national producer group founded
in 1978 comprised of approximately 105 life insurance producing firms with
approximately 425 individual producers operating exclusively in the upper end of
the wealth transfer and executive benefit markets. The life insurance companies
in the consolidated Company have been either the first or second largest
provider of life insurance products to the M Financial Group in each of the past
three years, although the member firms also sell the products of other prominent
U.S. life insurance companies.
We have jointly developed a proprietary life insurance product line with M
Financial Group to meet the distinct requirements of its producers. We also
offer four proprietary investment options of M Fund, Inc. on all variable life
insurance products sold by M Financial Group members, in addition to the
investment options supported by the variable series trust (VST). In 2000, we
became the first provider to roll out Magnastar, M Group's proprietary private
placement life insurance product, co-manufactured by M Life, John Hancock Life
Insurance Company and John Hancock Variable Life Insurance Company.
In addition to these proprietary products, we provide a number of
exclusive services to M Financial Group members, including a deferred
compensation plan, dedicated sales, underwriting and services teams and
participation in special marketing events, as well as M Financial Group
sponsored systems and technology initiatives. In addition, M Life Insurance
Company shares the insurance risk (including investment, lapse, mortality and
expense risk), through the use of reinsurance treaties, on 50% of most of our
policies that its members sell. These products and services and this reinsurance
arrangement serve to align M Financial Group producers' incentives with ours.
The business generated by M Financial Group producers has experienced
lower termination or non-renewal (referred to in the industry as "lapse") and
mortality rates than the industry average.
e-Business & Retail Partnerships. This unit, launched in 1996, complements
our traditional sales efforts. Through this unit, we sell term life insurance
through insurance aggregators that reach consumers over the Internet and via the
telephone.
Essex/Banks. We offer life and individual long-term care insurance
products through banks that have established an insurance sales force. Sales of
insurance products in this channel build on our well developed sales of fixed
and variable annuity and mutual fund product sales in the bank channel.
Group sales force. Group long-term care insurance products are marketed by
a dedicated sales force located in major cities around the country. The sales
force works closely with consultants, brokers, and other intermediaries to
generate sales and grow existing accounts.
The table below shows Protection Segment sales by distribution channel for
the periods indicated. Individual life insurance sales exclude excess premiums,
which are premiums that build cash value but do not purchase any additional face
amount of insurance, on variable life and universal life insurance products and
premiums on corporate owned life insurance and bank owned life insurance
policies covering more than 200 lives. Sales include 10% of single premium
payments on universal life and whole life insurance policies. Group long-term
care sales include (i) sales made to new employer groups initially effective in
the year, (ii) new enrollees in existing group accounts, (iii) sales
constituting increased coverage to existing insureds, (iv) and sales to
non-
9
JOHN HANCOCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
employer groups and new employees added to a group. COLI is sold only by
Signator, M Financial Group and through banks. BOLI is sold only by Signator and
M Financial Group.
Protection Segment Sales by Distribution Channel
For the Years Ended December 31,
--------------------------------
2003 2002 2001
---- ---- ----
(in millions)
Signator:(1)
Individual life--excluding COLI and BOLI .. $128.9 $151.4 $137.7
Individual life--COLI ..................... 24.6 57.7 74.2
Individual long-term care ................. 197.2 130.9 101.1
M Financial Group:
Individual life--excluding COLI ........... 48.8 60.9 45.9
Individual life--COLI ..................... 41.5 32.0 38.4
Individual long-term care ................. 0.5 0.6 0.2
e-Business & Retail Partnerships:
Individual life ........................... 7.5 14.0 10.4
Individual long-term care ................. 0.1 1.0 0.9
Dedicated Sales Force:
Group long-term care ...................... 18.3 16.6 16.8
BOLI ............................................... 19.3 16.3 12.2
Other:
Federal long-term care .................... 83.3 52.8 --
--------------------------------
Total:(2)
Individual life--excluding COLI and BOLI .. $185.2 $226.3 $194.0
Individual life--COLI and BOLI ............ 85.4 106.0 124.8
Individual long-term care ................. 197.8 132.5 102.2
Group long-term care ...................... 18.3 16.6 16.8
Federal long-term care .................... 83.3 52.8 --
================================
- ----------
(1) Signator includes sales by the Signator Financial Network as well as all
insurance brokerage sales, sales through broker/dealers, sales through
financial institutions, and sales related to Fortis.
(2) Sales represent a measure, defined by LIMRA, of the amount of new business
we have sold during the period rather than a measure of revenue.
Underwriting
Insurance underwriting involves a determination of the type and amount of
risk that an insurer is willing to accept and the premium to be charged.
Underwriting also determines the amount and type of reinsurance levels
appropriate for a particular type of risk. By utilizing reinsurance, we can
limit our risk and, at times, improve product pricing.
Our underwriting standards for life insurance are intended to result in
the issuance of policies that produce mortality experience consistent with the
assumptions used in product pricing. Our underwriting is based on our historical
mortality experience, as well as the experience of the insurance industry and of
the general population. We continually compare our underwriting standards
against the industry to mitigate our exposure to higher risk business and to
stay abreast of industry trends. For individual long-term care insurance
products, we use separate but similar underwriting criteria appropriate to the
morbidity risks insured. Our overall profitability depends to a large extent on
the degree to which our mortality and/or morbidity experience matches our
pricing assumptions. Our life and long-term care insurance underwriters evaluate
policy applications on the basis of the information provided by the applicant
and others. In our underwriting of long-term care insurance we use a Telephone
Interview Program, which permits eligible long-term care insurance clients to be
interviewed over the telephone by trained nurses, replacing the collection of a
physician's statement in 50% of the cases, leading to lower costs and faster
cycle times, without any loss of required underwriting information. In addition,
we use the STAR (System to Assess Risk) underwriting system to process business
in an automated environment which has resulted in a reduction of cycle times,
improved productivity and a reduction of total costs. As an organization we
continue to review our underwriting processes to further reduce our unit costs
by streamlining our underwriting tools and increasing policy taken rates.
Group long-term care insurance underwriting is conducted on both the
employer group level and the individual level. Our group long-term care
insurance corporate customers generally offer their employees the opportunity to
purchase coverage on a "guaranteed-issue" basis, meaning that all employees are
eligible for insurance coverage, and offer individually underwritten
10
JOHN HANCOCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
coverage to family members. We rely on our experience in underwriting large
groups in order to set prices that take into account the underwriting
arrangements, the general health conditions of the corporate customers'
employees, the specifics of the negotiated plan design, and other demographic
and morbidity trends. Group products are written on a guaranteed renewable
basis, which permits repricing if necessary.
Our corporate owned and bank owned life insurance policies covering
multiple lives are issued on a guaranteed issue basis, where the amount of
insurance issued per life on a guaranteed basis is related to the total number
of lives being covered and the particular need for which the product is being
purchased. Guaranteed issue underwriting applies to employees actively at work,
and product pricing reflects the additional guaranteed issue underwriting risk.
Reserves
We establish and report liabilities for future policy benefits on our
balance sheet to meet the obligations under our insurance policies and
contracts. Our liability for variable life insurance and universal life
insurance policies and contracts is equal to the cumulative account balances.
Cumulative account balances include deposits plus credited interest less expense
and mortality fees and withdrawals. Future policy benefits for our traditional
life, individual long-term care and group long-term care insurance policies are
calculated based on a set of actuarial assumptions that we establish and
maintain throughout the lives of the policies. Our assumptions include
investment yields, mortality, morbidity and expenses.
Competition
We face significant competition in all our retail protection businesses.
Our competitors include other large and highly rated insurance carriers as well
as certain banks, securities brokerage firms, investment advisors and other
financial intermediaries marketing annuities and mutual funds. Some of these
competitors have greater financial strength and resources and have penetrated
more markets. We believe that we distinguish ourselves from our competitors
through the combination of:
o our strong and reputable brand name;
o our strong financial ratings;
o our broad range of competitive and innovative products and our
ability to create unique product combinations for various
distribution channels;
o the depth of our experience as one of the first companies to offer
variable life insurance, individual long-term care insurance and
group long-term care insurance;
o our brand penetration within each channel of distribution; and
o our dedication to customer service.
Competition also exists for agents and other distributors of insurance
products. Much of this competition is based on the pricing of products and the
agent or distributor compensation structure. We believe that our competitive
strengths coupled with the advantages of our Signator network will enable us to
compete successfully to attract and retain top quality agents and distributors.
Reinsurance
We reinsure portions of the risks we assume for our protection products.
The maximum amount of individual ordinary life insurance retained by us on any
life is $10 million under an individual policy and $20 million under a
second-to-die policy. As of January 1, 2001, we established additional
reinsurance programs, which limit our exposure to fluctuations in life claims
for individuals for whom the net amount at risk is $3 million or more. As of
January 1, 2001, the Company entered into an agreement with two reinsurers
covering 50% of its closed block business. The treaties are structured so they
will not affect policyholder dividends or any other financial items reported
within the closed block, which was established at the time of the Life Company's
demutualization to protect the reasonable dividend expectations of certain
participating life insurance policyholders.
11
JOHN HANCOCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
In addition, the Company has entered into reinsurance agreements to
specifically address insurance exposure to multiple life insurance claims as a
result of a catastrophic event. The Company has put into place, catastrophic
reinsurance covering individual life insurance policies written by all of its
U.S. life insurance subsidiaries. Effective July 1, 2003, the deductible was
reduced from $25.0 million to $17.5 million per occurrence and the limit of
coverage is $40 million per occurrence. Both the deductible and the limit apply
to the combined U.S. insurance subsidiaries. Should catastrophic reinsurance
become unavailable to the Company in the future, the absence of, or further
limitations on, reinsurance coverage could adversely affect the Company's future
net income and financial position.
By entering into reinsurance agreements with a diverse group of highly
rated reinsurers, we seek to control our exposure to losses. Our reinsurance,
however, does not discharge our legal obligations to pay policy claims on the
policies reinsured. As a result, we enter into reinsurance agreements only with
highly rated reinsurers. Nevertheless, there can be no assurance that all our
reinsurers will pay the claims we make against them. Failure of a reinsurer to
pay a claim could adversely affect our business, financial condition or results
of operations.
For a further description of operating results, see Management's
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations--Protection Segment, included elsewhere in this Form 10-K.
12
JOHN HANCOCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
Asset Gathering Segment
Overview
Through our Asset Gathering Segment, we offer individual annuities, mutual
fund products and investment management services. Individual annuities include
variable and fixed annuities, both immediate and deferred. Mutual fund products
primarily consist of open-end mutual funds and closed-end funds. Our investment
management services include retirement services, and the management of
institutional accounts. In this segment, we also include the results of
Signator, John Hancock Signature Services, our limited-service banking
subsidiary, and Essex Corporation, one of the nation's largest intermediaries
between banks and product manufacturers for annuities.
The Asset Gathering Segment contributed 12.5%, 12.8% and 12.5% of
consolidated operating revenues and 20.5 %, 15.8% and 18.4% of consolidated
segment after-tax operating income in the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002
and 2001, respectively. The Asset Gathering Segment generated operating revenues
of $1,254.4 million, $1,147.8 million and $1,176.5 million and segment after-tax
operating income of $194.3 million, $130.7 million and $148.3 million in 2003,
2002 and 2001, respectively. The Asset Gathering Segment has achieved the
following financial results for the periods indicated:
As of or for the Years Ended December 31,
-----------------------------------------
2003 2002 2001
---- ---- ----
(in millions)
Sales:(1)
Variable annuities(2) ................... $ 405.1 $ 746.1 $ 639.6
Fixed annuities(2) ...................... 2,319.4 2,667.9 1,463.6
John Hancock Funds(3) ................... 4,596.7 4,737.6 5,001.4
------------------------------------------
Total .......................... $ 7,321.2 $ 8,151.6 $ 7,104.6
==========================================
Assets:
Variable annuities ...................... $ 6,205.5 $ 5,702.4 $ 6,750.0
Fixed annuities ......................... 12,216.8 9,935.8 7,428.2
John Hancock Funds ...................... 226.9 245.4 338.4
Other ................................... 72.3 169.2 223.9
------------------------------------------
Total .......................... $18,721.5 $16,052.8 $14,740.5
==========================================
Assets Under Management:
Variable annuities ...................... $ 5,779.3 $ 5,327.4 $ 6,357.1
Fixed annuities ......................... 11,608.0 9,226.2 6,876.6
John Hancock Funds(4) ................... 29,289.9 25,810.3 29,285.8
- ----------
(1) Sales represent a measure, defined by LIMRA, of the amount of new business
we have sold during the period rather than a measure of revenue.
(2) Represents statutory annual statement values. Statutory revenues include
premiums and deposits on variable and fixed annuities. Statutory premiums
and deposits differ from GAAP premiums because GAAP requires that variable
and certain fixed annuity products be accounted for using deposit
accounting. Deposit accounting excludes from revenue the premiums and
deposits received on these products. Variable annuity sales exclude safe
harbor internal exchanges of $92.0 million and $1,910.5 million,
respectively, in 2002 and 2001. No such exchanges took place in 2003.
Fixed annuity sales for 2002 and 2001 have been restated to exclude
supplemental contracts.
(3) Mutual fund and institutional asset sales are defined as new inflows of
funds from investors into our investment products. Sales of mutual fund
products are recorded on the trade date. Sales of institutional investment
products are recorded on the date a firm commitment is established.
(4) Includes $2.7 billion, $3.4 billion and $3.6 billion of our general
account assets and assets managed for certain John Hancock subsidiaries
and assets managed for variable annuities as of December 31, 2003, 2002
and 2001, respectively.
Products and Markets
Annuities
We offer variable and fixed annuities, both immediate and deferred, to a
broad range of consumers through multiple distribution channels. Annuities may
be deferred, where assets accumulate until the contract is surrendered, the
contractholder dies, or the contractholder begins receiving benefits under an
annuity payout option; or immediate, where payments begin within one year of
issue and continue for a fixed period of time or for life with or without a
period certain.
Variable annuities are separate account products, where the contractholder
bears the investment risk and has the right to allocate funds among various
separate investment subaccounts. Our major source of revenues from variable
annuities is mortality
13
JOHN HANCOCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
and expense fees charged to the contractholder, generally determined as a
percentage of the market value of the underlying variable assets under
management. Our Revolution series variable annuity product line, introduced in
the fourth quarter of 2000, was the first in the industry to offer assistance
with the cost of long-term care, with no underwriting. We introduced Revolution
II in May, 2003 and made many enhancements to the product line, including
offering options on length of surrender charges with in the product and
associated fees. Revolution is targeted to the needs of aging consumers who want
to accumulate funds for retirement and provide a hedge against the cost of
long-term care. Revolution sales comprised 94%, 94% and 88% of total variable
annuity sales for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001,
respectively.
Fixed annuities are general account products, where we bear the investment
risk as funds are invested in our general account and a stated interest rate is
credited to the contractholders' accounts. Our major source of income from fixed
annuities is the spread between the investment income earned on the underlying
general account assets and the interest credited to contractholders' accounts.
Despite a difficult interest rate environment, John Hancock continued to issue
products with guaranteed floor rates to attract the retail customer.
Investment management skills are critical to the growth and profitability
of our annuity business. The available investment options under our variable
annuity products include options that are funded through the John Hancock
Variable Series Trust I (VST). The VST contains subadvised funds managed by some
of the world's premier money managers, which John Hancock, as investment
adviser, is responsible for overseeing. As the VST's investment adviser, John
Hancock oversees the subadvisers and monitors their investment styles for
consistency. All our fixed annuity assets are managed internally.
The relative proportion of our total annuity sales represented by fixed
and variable annuities is generally driven by the relative performance of the
equity and fixed income markets. The Company's total annuity deposits were
comprised of 85.2% fixed annuity and 14.8% variable annuity for the year ended
December 31, 2003 and 78.2% fixed annuity and 21.8% variable annuity for the
year ended December 31, 2002. The following table presents certain information
regarding our annuity reserve activity for the periods indicated:
Annuity Reserve Activity
As of or for the Years Ended December 31,
-----------------------------------------
2003 2002 2001
---- ---- ----
(in millions)
Variable Annuities:
Reserves, beginning of year .............................. $ 5,302.5 $ 6,323.1 $ 7,182.8
Deposits and other policy credits ............... 408.5 747.9 641.3
Interest credited and investment performance .... 922.7 (778.4) (570.9)
Surrenders and benefits ......................... (808.7) (880.7) (814.8)
Product fees .................................... (102.5) (109.4) (115.3)
------------------------------------------
Reserves, end of year .................................... $ 5,722.5 $ 5,302.5 $ 6,323.1
==========================================
Fixed Annuities:
Reserves, beginning of year .............................. $ 8,761.8 $ 6,497.4 $ 5,365.8
Premiums, deposits and other policy credits ..... 2,352.0 2,690.6 1,478.0
Interest credited ............................... 437.3 394.1 344.7
Surrenders and benefits ......................... (857.9) (810.9) (680.7)
Product fees .................................... (14.3) (9.4) (10.4)
------------------------------------------
Reserves, end of year .................................... $10,678.9 $ 8,761.8 $ 6,497.4
==========================================
Total Annuities:
Reserves, beginning of year .............................. $14,064.3 $12,820.5 $12,548.6
Premiums, deposits and other policy credits(1) .. 2,760.5 3,438.5 2,119.3
Interest credited and investment performance .... 1,360.0 (384.3) (226.2)
Surrenders and benefits ......................... (1,666.6) (1,691.6) (1,495.5)
Product fees .................................... (116.8) (118.8) (125.7)
------------------------------------------
Reserves, end of year .................................... $16,401.4 $14,064.3 $12,820.5
==========================================
- ----------
(1) Variable annuity deposits exclude internal exchanges as part of the safe
harbor internal exchange program of $92.0 million and $1,910.5 million for
the years ending December 31, 2002 and 2001, respectively. There were no
such exchanges in 2003.
14
JOHN HANCOCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
John Hancock Funds
We offer a variety of mutual fund products and related investment
management services through John Hancock Funds. We employ a team style in the
management of our funds. These teams manage portfolios in accordance with a
variety of specified strategies, which we believe gives us a competitive
advantage over competitors, many of whom deploy only one style across a family
of funds. As of December 31, 2003, our fixed income and equity research staffs
included over 55 portfolio managers and analysts with an average of 18 years of
experience. We are recruiting additional investment professionals to enhance our
capabilities across both fundamental and quantitative analysis and investment
styles. This ongoing commitment to investment research further enables us to
develop new products intended to strengthen our fund offerings, across a broad
array of investment styles. In addition, our investment staff is supplemented by
subadvisory arrangements with third-parties and other John Hancock units. We
also actively pursue the acquisition of top performing mutual funds, which can
be sold through our distribution system. While the business includes primarily
assets managed for third-party retail clients, the investment professionals
providing these services also manage assets underlying our general account and
separate account products, as well as variable life, variable annuity products
and Maritime Life.
o Mutual Funds. John Hancock Funds offers a broad array of open-end
mutual funds and closed-end funds to a broad base of consumers
across varying income levels. Open-end mutual funds are subject to
redemption at any time by investors. After their initial public
offering, the shares of closed-end funds are not subject to
redemption and, accordingly, represent a more stable base of assets
than open-end funds. As of December 31, 2003, 59.1% of our mutual
fund assets under management were invested in open-end mutual funds.
Our product offerings cover both domestic and international equity
and fixed-income markets. In 2003, the Company added four new funds
to its domestic offerings. Three new open-end funds were offered;
Large Cap Select Fund, Mid Cap Equity Fund and Cash Investment
Trust. The Large Cap Select Fund was acquired from Shay Assets
Management, Inc. in August 2003. In addition, one new closed-end
fund was offered; John Hancock Preferred Income Fund III.
o Retirement Services. We offer traditional IRA programs and a
complete line of retirement products, including: 401(k) plans and
sole proprietor 401(k) plans of a third party, SIMPLE IRA and SIMPLE
401(k) plans for companies with no more than 100 eligible employees
and no other qualified plan; Simplified Employee Pensions for
companies of any size, including self-employed persons, partnerships
and corporations; and Roth IRA plans for individuals.
o Institutional Services. John Hancock Funds manages diversified
equity and fixed income strategies in multiple investment vehicles
on behalf of public pension plans, corporate pension plans,
endowments & foundations, insurance companies, and Taft-Hartley
pension plans.
The following tables present certain information regarding the assets
under management by John Hancock Funds for the periods indicated:
Total Assets Under Management By Asset Class
As of December 31,
------------------
2003 2002 2001
---- ---- ----
(in millions)
Assets Under Management:
Domestic equity and balanced ............... $17,633.9 $13,727.7 $17,898.4
International equity and balanced .......... 310.1 309.3 391.3
Domestic and international fixed income .... 11,345.9 11,773.3 10,996.1
---------------------------------
Total assets under management(1) .. $29,289.9 $25,810.3 $29,285.8
=================================
15
JOHN HANCOCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
Asset Flow Summary
For the Years Ended December 31,
--------------------------------
2003 2002 2001
---- ---- ----
(in millions)
Retail Mutual Funds:
Assets under management, beginning of year ... $19,233.0 $22,876.2 $26,541.4
Deposits and reinvestments .......... 4,244.9 4,056.6 3,958.7
Redemptions and withdrawals ......... (3,364.4) (3,817.2) (4,300.8)
Net money market funds .............. (157.4) (205.4) (205.5)
Market appreciation (depreciation) .. 3,096.1 (3,387.1) (2,770.2)
Fees ................................ (266.1) (290.1) (347.5)
-----------------------------------
Assets under management, end of year(1) ...... $22,786.1 $19,233.0 $22,876.1
===================================
Institutional Investment Management:
Assets under management, beginning of year ... $ 6,577.3 $ 6,409.6 $ 5,184.4
Deposits and reinvestments .......... 773.3 1,198.2 1,924.4
Redemptions and withdrawals ......... (1,743.4) (853.1) (822.3)
Market appreciation (depreciation) .. 913.4 (160.9) 137.2
Fees ................................ (16.8) (16.5) (14.0)
-----------------------------------
Assets under management, end of year ......... $ 6,503.8 $ 6,577.3 $ 6,409.7
===================================
Total:
Assets under management, beginning of year ... $25,810.3 $29,285.8 $31,725.8
Deposits and reinvestments .......... 5,018.2 5,254.8 5,883.1
Redemptions and withdrawals ......... (5,107.8) (4,670.3) (5,123.1)
Net money market funds .............. (157.4) (205.4) (205.5)
Market appreciation (depreciation) .. 4,009.5 (3,548.0) (2,633.0)
Fees ................................ (282.9) (306.6) (361.5)
-----------------------------------
Assets under management, end of year(1) ...... $29,289.9 $25,810.3 $29,285.8
===================================
- ----------
(1) Retail mutual fund assets under management includes $2.7 billion, $2.5
billion and $3.7 billion in retirement plan assets at December 31, 2003,
2002 and 2001, respectively.
Distribution
Asset Gathering products are distributed through Signator, Essex,
independent broker/dealers, banks, directly to state lottery commissions and
both directly and through consultants to institutions and retirement plan
sponsors.
Signator. Signator, a subsidiary of the Company, through its broker/dealer
and insurance agency subsidiaries, is a key distribution channel for our
variable annuities. We also sell fixed annuities, mutual funds, 401(k) programs
and other retirement programs through these entities.
Essex Corporation. Essex, a subsidiary of the Company, is one of the
nation's largest intermediaries between banks and product manufacturers for
annuities. Essex is the Company's primary distribution channel for selling
annuities through banks. Essex has historically focused on selling fixed
annuities and strives to grow variable annuity sales. Essex also serves as an
intermediary in the distribution of mutual funds. Essex's primary source of
income is commissions on sales of these products.
Broker/Dealers. Broker/dealers, which include regional and national
brokerage firms and financial planners, are the primary distribution channel for
our mutual funds. Broker/dealers also sell our fixed and variable annuities. We
support this distribution channel with a network of wholesalers, referred to as
"Business Development Consultants", for our mutual fund sales. These wholesalers
meet directly with broker/dealers and financial planners and are supported by an
extensive home office sales and marketing staff.
Pension Consultants. We market investment management services to pension
consultants nationwide who provide advisory services to plan sponsors. Marketing
efforts are supported by dedicated client relationship officers who keep clients
updated on portfolio performance information.
The table below shows Asset Gathering Segment sales by distribution
channel for the periods indicated. Sales is a non-GAAP measure. Sales refer to
premiums and deposits received by the Company and are not reflective of revenue
on the Company's income statement. GAAP refers to the application of accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States. A
16
JOHN HANCOCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
non-GAAP measure refers to a financial metric relevant to Company performance
but not appearing in the Company's GAAP financial statements.
Asset Gathering Segment Sales by Distribution Channel
For the Years Ended December 31,
--------------------------------
2003 2002 2001
---- ---- ----
(in millions)
Broker/Dealers(1):
Variable annuities(2) ................ $ 51.4 $ 133.9 $ 145.2
Fixed annuities ...................... 1,031.8 555.3 260.5
Mutual funds ......................... 3,948.1 3,504.4 2,816.6
Signator:
Variable annuities(2) ................ 243.5 305.8 414.0
Fixed annuities ...................... 232.6 243.1 131.9
Mutual funds ......................... 212.9 270.2 367.5
Pension Consultants:
Mutual funds ......................... 384.5 911.7 1,700.6
Financial Institutions:
Variable annuities ................... 100.4 277.9 60.0
Fixed annuities ...................... 967.2 1,704.1 1,049.0
Mutual funds ......................... 51.2 51.3 116.7
e-Business and Retail Partnerships ............ 7.5 30.1 19.2
Other(3) ...................................... 90.1 163.8 23.4
--------------------------------
Total ................................ $7,321.2 $8,151.6 $7,104.6
================================
- ----------
(1) The prior years have been restated to include Fidelity sales in the
Broker/Dealer channel and exclude them from the Financial Institutions
channel.
(2) Variable annuity deposits exclude internal exchanges as part of the safe
harbor internal exchange program of $92.0 million and $1,910.5 million,
respectively, for the years ending December 31, 2002 and 2001. There were
no such exchanges in 2003.
(3) Other includes single premium immediate annuities, including
lottery-related payout contracts.
Reserves
We establish and report liabilities for future policy benefits on our
balance sheet to meet the obligations under our annuity contracts. Our liability
for variable annuity contracts and deferred fixed annuity contracts is equal to
the cumulative account balances. Cumulative account balances include deposits
plus credited interest or change in investment value less expense and mortality
fees, as applicable, and withdrawals. Future policy benefits on our immediate
fixed annuity contracts are calculated based on a set of actuarial assumptions
that we establish and maintain throughout the lives of the contracts.
Competition
We face substantial competition in all aspects of our asset gathering
business. The annuity business is highly competitive. We compete with a large
number of insurance companies, investment management firms, mutual fund
companies, banks and others in the sale of annuities. We compete for mutual fund
business with hundreds of fund companies. Many of our competitors in the mutual
fund industry are larger, have been established for a longer period of time,
offer less expensive products, have deeper penetration in key distribution
channels and have more resources than us.
Competition in the asset gathering business is based on several factors.
These include investment performance and the ability to successfully penetrate
distribution channels, to offer effective service to intermediaries and
consumers, to develop products to meet the changing needs of various consumer
segments, to charge competitive fees and to control expenses.
We believe the Asset Gathering Segment is well positioned to increase
assets under management in the face of this competition. Our competitive
strengths include the ability to:
o deliver strong investment performance, and enhance this performance
by expanding the depth and breadth of fundamental research,
portfolio management teams, and investment professionals;
o develop new products and expand into new markets; and
17
JOHN HANCOCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
o provide excellent service to investors and distributors.
Service Organizations
Within the Asset Gathering Segment, we also include our servicing
subsidiary, John Hancock Signature Services.
John Hancock Signature Services combines and coordinates customer service
functions for life insurance, annuity and mutual fund customers. The services
provided by John Hancock Signature Services, Inc. include new business
processing underwriting, contract change services, claims processing, premium
collection and processing, billing, and preparation of annual and quarterly
statements. Through this subsidiary, we seek to provide an integrated and
comprehensive customer service function on a cost-effective basis. This system
permits a customer to have a single point of contact for most servicing needs.
For a further description of operating results, see Management's
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations--Asset
Gathering Segment, included elsewhere in this Form 10-K.
18
JOHN HANCOCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
Guaranteed and Structured Financial Products Segment
Overview
Through our Guaranteed and Structured Financial Products Segment (G&SFP),
we offer a variety of specialized products and services to qualified defined
benefit and defined contribution retirement plans, and other domestic and
international investors. Our products include non-guaranteed,
partially-guaranteed and fully-guaranteed general account and separate account
investment options. We distribute these products through home office and
regional sales representatives either directly to institutional buyers or
indirectly through financial intermediaries, consultants and brokers.
The G&SFP Segment contributed 22.1%, 23.2% and 29.9% of consolidated
operating revenues and 33.9%, 34.5% and 30.3% of consolidated segment after-tax
operating income in the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001,
respectively. The G&SFP Segment generated revenues of $2,221.4 million, $2,067.9
million and $2,793.1 million and segment after-tax operating income of $321.7
million, $285.4 million and $244.2 million in 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively.
G&SFP Segment financial information is summarized below:
As of December 31,
------------------
2003 2002 2001
---- ---- ----
(in millions)
Assets Under Management:
Spread-based products ............................................................. $27,581.2 $25,125.1 $22,469.0
Fee-based products ................................................................ 8,208.6 8,404.4 8,476.3
----------------------------------
Total .................................................................... $35,789.8 $33,529.5 $30,945.3
==================================
Spread-based Premiums and Deposits:
Fund-type products ................................................................ $ 2,524.6 $ 4,067.7 $ 4,718.8
Single premium annuities .......................................................... 468.4 292.7 893.6
SignatureNotes .................................................................... 1,260.1 290.2 --
Banking Products .................................................................. 245.2 -- --
----------------------------------
Total Spread-based Premiums and Deposits ................................. $ 4,498.3 $ 4,650.6 $ 5,612.4
==================================
Fee-based Premiums and Deposits:
General account participating pension fund-type products and annuity contracts .... $ 852.5 $ 529.3 $ 468.9
Structured separate accounts ...................................................... 54.5 483.9 77.4
Other separate account contracts .................................................. (46.2) 53.9 139.3
----------------------------------
Total Fee-based Premiums and Deposits .................................... $ 860.8 $ 1,067.1 $ 685.6
==================================
The premiums and deposits presented above are non-GAAP measures. Premiums
and deposits above differ from GAAP premiums because GAAP requires that deposits
on fund-type products be accounted for using deposit accounting which excludes
the contributions and deposits received from revenue and generally shows only
the fees and investment income earned from these products as revenues.
Products and Markets
The G&SFP Segment offers spread-based products and fee-based products in a
variety of markets. Spread-based products serve the larger and faster growing
segment of the market. Fee-based products are typically niche products that have
less overall growth potential. The general account Guaranteed Investment
Contract (GIC) has been our predominant product issued in the tax-qualified
defined contribution plan market. Single premium and separate account annuities
are primarily limited to qualified and non-qualified defined benefit plans.
Funding agreements are issued to non-qualified domestic and international
institutional investors. By working closely with our customers to develop
customized investment programs, we have built a leading market share in several
important markets, including general account GICs, funding agreements and single
premium annuities.
Spread-Based Products. Our spread-based products provide a guaranteed rate
of return to the customer. We derive earnings on these products primarily from
the difference between the investment returns on the supporting assets and the
guaranteed returns provided to customers. Our spread-based products include:
o Fund-type products. Our fund-type products consist of the following:
19
JOHN HANCOCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
General account GICs. GICs are annuity contracts that pay a
guaranteed rate of return. GICs are primarily marketed to sponsors
of tax-qualified retirement plans such as 401(k) plans. The
guaranteed rate of return on GICs can be a fixed rate or a floating
rate based on an external market index.
Funding agreements. Funding agreements are investment contracts that
pay a guaranteed rate of return. Funding agreements generally are
issued to corporations, mutual funds and other institutional
investors and, unlike GICs, are not typically used to fund
retirement plans. The guaranteed rate of return on funding
agreements can be a fixed rate or a floating rate based on an
external market index.
o Single premium annuities and structured settlements. Single premium
annuities are immediate or deferred annuity contracts, which provide
for payments of a guaranteed amount commencing at a specified time,
typically at retirement. These annuities are sold primarily to
defined benefit plan closeouts. The two most common types of
annuities are the straight life annuity, which makes payments for
the life of a retired annuitant, and the joint and survivor annuity,
which continues to make payments to a spouse after the death of the
annuitant. We also provide structured settlements, which provide a
tax-free stream of periodic payments to individuals who receive
awards or settlements in personal physical injury disputes. We have
broadened our offerings to include a structuring program for
attorney's fees, allowing counsel to defer legal fees as taxable
disbursements into the future.
o SignatureNotes. SignatureNotes are debt securities issued directly
by the Life Company to retail investors via a broker/dealer network.
These debt securities, available to investors in $1,000 increments,
are offered weekly under a $3 billion shelf registration with
varying terms and maturity dates, as permitted in the prospectus.
o Banking Products. Banking Products consist primarily of brokered
certificate of deposits issued by First Signature Bank & Trust via a
broker-dealer network to the retail investors. These CDs are offered
weekly with varying terms and maturity dates. Brokered certificates
of deposits are FDIC insured up to $100,000. First Signature Bank &
Trust is a limited-service bank. It accepts demand deposits but does
not make commercial loans. It provides consumer banking products and
services to our customers. First Signature Bank & Trust Company had
$354.8 million and $100.5 million in assets as of December 31, 2003
and 2002.
Fee-Based Products. Our fee-based products generally pass the investment
results of invested assets through to the contractholder with no, or minimal,
guarantees. We derive earnings on these products primarily from expense, risk,
and profit charges that are generally assessed based on assets under management.
Fee-based businesses provide relatively stable revenues and have lower capital
requirements than our spread-based businesses. Our fee-based products include:
o Participating general account fund-type products and annuity
contracts. These products are funding vehicles for pension plans
that pass investment results through to the contractholder, after
risk and profit charges. Annuity guarantees for these products are
supported by asset adequacy requirements under which assets must be
maintained at levels at least 5% above the annuity reserve. If the
level of assets held under the contract falls below this threshold,
we may liquidate assets equal to the annuity reserve and apply the
assets to purchase a fully guaranteed annuity.
o Structured Separate Accounts. These products pass the investment
results of a separate account through to the contractholder and
contain only minimal guarantees. Contractholders may select from
among flexible investment options provided by our various investment
managers. The structured separate account business leverages the
strong marketing relationships developed with our general account
GIC customers. These contracts, like the general account GICs, are
primarily marketed to sponsors of tax-qualified retirement plans
such as 401(k) plans.
o Participating separate account annuities. These products are funding
vehicles for pension plans which offer customers an insured
pension-funding program in conjunction with a broad range of
investment options, including both equity and fixed-income
investment classes. The risk associated with providing these
annuities is mitigated by excess collateral maintenance
requirements, which vary depending on the investment option
selected. If the collateral falls below the maintenance
requirements, we may liquidate assets equal to the annuity reserve
and apply the assets to purchase a fully guaranteed annuity.
o Separate investment accounts. These are non-guaranteed group annuity
contracts under which assets are held in a separate account. We
typically use affiliated investment advisors to manage these assets.
We may also use non-affiliated investment managers if the customer
so requires. Because these products do not provide guarantees, most
new sales of separate investment accounts are reported in the
Investment Management Segment. Existing agreements, however,
continue to be reported in and serviced by the Guaranteed and
Structured Financial Products Segment because of customer
relationships.
20
JOHN HANCOCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
Distribution
We distribute our guaranteed and structured financial products through a
variety of channels. General account GICs and structured separate accounts are
sold through our regional representatives to plan sponsors, or to GIC managers
who represent plan sponsors. Funding agreements are sold either directly,
through brokers, or through investment banks in the form of medium-term notes.
SignatureNotes and Banking Products are distributed through a retail brokerage
network. Annuities are sold through pension consultants who represent defined
benefit plan sponsors or through brokers who receive a commission for sales of
our products. Structured settlement annuities are offered through a group of
broker companies specializing in dispute resolution.
We have an experienced sales staff that develops and maintains
relationships with target customers, consultants, and other financial
intermediaries. We believe that our consistent market presence over the past two
decades has created strong and valuable relationships with a large segment of
the customer base.
Spread-Based Products Risk Management
Because of the significant guarantees provided as part of our spread-based
product offerings, risk management is particularly important in this line of
business. To facilitate risk management, we segregate and manage the assets
supporting our spread-based products separately from the rest of our general
account. Our risk management strategy incorporates a sophisticated
asset/liability matching system that is based on:
o Managing interest rate exposure by closely matching the relative
sensitivity of asset and liability values to interest rate changes,
i.e. controlling the "duration mismatch" of assets and liabilities.
o Using sophisticated systems and processes to project cash flows for
each asset and each liability and to measure with precision the
sensitivity of assets and liabilities to interest rate changes.
o Writing contracts that typically have a predictable maturity
structure and do not have premature surrender or redemption
provisions.
o Monitoring all contribution and withdrawal activity in each contract
to anticipate deviations from expected cash flows.
o Establishing working groups with representatives from our various
business units, to facilitate interaction among investment
management, sales management, risk management, financial management
and the pricing staff.
For additional information, see Quantitative and Qualitative Information
about Market Risk, included elsewhere in this Form 10-K.
Underwriting
Underwriting is most significant for the following products in this
segment:
o General Account GICs. In developing pricing proposals for new
contracts, our underwriters estimate both base-line cash flows and
also likely variance from the base line due to plan participants
reallocating assets from the "stable value" option of their defined
contribution plan. Our underwriters utilize customized pricing
models that generate plan-specific risk charges for each customer's
book value payment provision. If these pricing models project the
risk of losses exceeding customary thresholds, instead of rejecting
the business, our underwriters can modify the proposal by suggesting
the use of risk reduction techniques designed to shift some of the
risk of redemptions back to the plan or to a third party.
o Single Premium Annuities. We underwrite immediate annuities using
recent mortality experience and an assumption of continued
improvement in annuitant longevity. We underwrite deferred annuities
by analyzing mortality risk and the expected time to retirement.
Reserves
We establish and report liabilities for contractholders' funds and future
policy benefits to meet the obligations on our policies and contracts. Our
liability for fund-type products and fee-based products is equal to the
cumulative account balances for these products. Cumulative account balances
include deposits plus credited interest or investment earnings less expense
charges and withdrawals. Future policy benefits for our single premium annuity
contracts are calculated based on a set of actuarial assumptions that we
establish and maintain throughout the lives of the contracts. Our assumptions
include investment yields, mortality and the expected time to retirement.
21
JOHN HANCOCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
Competition
Our Guaranteed and Structured Financial Products Segment operates in a
variety of highly competitive institutional markets. Although a large number of
companies offer these products, the market is concentrated. Through the first
three quarters of 2003, five insurers, including the Life Company, issued
approximately 58% of total GICs and funding agreements issued by U.S. insurance
companies reporting to LIMRA; and nine insurers, including the Life Company,
issued more than 99% of total single premium annuities. Our competitors include
a variety of well-recognized insurance companies, domestic and foreign banks and
other institutional investment advisors.
With the introduction of SignatureNotes we became the first insurer to
enter the retail market to compete with other issuers of direct access notes,
including both financial and non-financial firms. There are a large number of
competitors but none with a substantial share of the market. We recently
developed Banking Products like the brokered certificate of deposit which
demonstrates our commitment to increase our product range to access new retail
markets. This new Banking Product has FDIC insurance which differentiates it
from our other products.
We believe that we are able to compete successfully in our markets as a
result of our strong financial ratings, brand name, investment management
expertise, national distribution, flexible product design and competitive
pricing. Competition in this market is restricted almost exclusively to
insurance companies with superior or excellent financial ratings. The
requirement for strong financial ratings reduces pressure on margins by limiting
the number of potential competitors and by lowering our cost of funds.
For a further description of operating results, see Management's
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations--Guaranteed and Structured Financial Products Segment included
elsewhere in this Form 10-K.
22
JOHN HANCOCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
Investment Management Segment
Overview
Through our Investment Management Segment, we provide investment
management services to domestic and international institutions. While this
segment includes primarily assets managed for third-party institutional clients,
the investment professionals providing these services also manage assets
underlying our general account and separate account products, as well as
variable life and annuity and mutual fund products. The Investment Management
Segment attracts funds from corporate and public pension plan sponsors, banks,
insurance companies, mutual funds, endowments, foundations and other domestic
and international institutions.
The Investment Management Segment represented 19.5%, 21.8% and 23.3% of
our total assets under management as of December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001, which
were $142.5 billion, $127.6 billion and $124.2 billion, respectively. The
Investment Management Segment contributed $145.0 million, $124.6 million and
$143.2 million of consolidated operating revenues and $29.8 million, $21.2
million and $29.8 million of consolidated segment after-tax operating income in
the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively.
Products and Markets
The Investment Management Segment is primarily a fee-based investment
advisory business in which we do not offer guarantees to our customers. We
provide a variety of investment structures, such as investment advisory client
portfolios, individually managed and pooled separate accounts, registered
investment company funds, bond and mortgage securitizations, and mutual fund
management capabilities.
Our investment management expertise covers a wide range of private and
publicly-traded asset classes and is based on fundamental research and
disciplined, quantitatively-based analysis and asset-liability management. Our
private fixed income, equity, commercial mortgage and alternative asset
operations have strong credit analysis capabilities and deal origination
expertise. These operations enjoy broad networks of relationships with
intermediaries giving them early access to new investment opportunities. During
2003, we sold our international fund operations, the effect of which was
immaterial.
The capabilities of the Investment Management Segment include:
Public Fixed Income and Equity Investments. Through Independence
Investment LLC, we provide active stock management to pension funds, endowments,
and other institutions. We provide core, value, growth, medium-cap, small-cap,
balanced and market neutral investment strategies. During 2003, we sold our
international fund operations.
Through Declaration Management & Research LLC we offer active,
quantitative investment management services in the high quality fixed income
markets, with a special emphasis on structuring and managing portfolios of
asset-backed securities and mortgage-backed securities combined, when
appropriate, with various derivative strategies. These portfolios are either
managed directly for investors or structured as collateralized debt obligations
(CDOs).
Private Fixed Income, Equity and Alternative Asset Class Investments. We
manage funds for external institutional clients investing in private
fixed-income and equity securities and alternative asset classes. Our strength
is in private placement corporate securities, structured and innovative
transactions and niche investment opportunities. Our completed offerings include
mezzanine funds investing primarily in subordinated debt with equity
participation features and collateralized bond obligation funds, which have been
marketed domestically and internationally to banks, insurance companies, brokers
and other clients outside of the pension market.
We are a leading domestic and international manager of equity timberland
for large tax-exempt institutional investors, and are among the largest managers
of equity farmland investments. This segment also originates, services and
securitizes commercial mortgages. In addition, we sponsor affordable housing
investments that qualify for Federal tax credits.
23
JOHN HANCOCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
The following tables present certain information regarding the assets
under management by the Investment Management Segment for the periods indicated:
Total Assets Under Management By Asset Class
As of December 31,
------------------
2003 2002 2001
---- ---- ----
(in millions)
Assets Under Management:
Domestic equity and balanced ...................... $10,818.5 $11,159.9 $14,952.7
International equity and balanced (1) ............. 160.2 1,417.0 1,512.6
Domestic and international fixed income ........... 13,596.8 11,758.0 9,385.7
Timber, farmland and independent power ............ 3,187.9 3,156.5 2,919.6
---------------------------------
Total assets under management(3)(4) ...... $27,763.4 $27,491.4 $28,770.6
=================================
Asset Flow Summary
As of December 31,
------------------
2003 2002 2001
---- ---- ----
(in millions)
Assets Under Management:
Assets under management, beginning of year(2)(5) .. $27,491.4 $28,770.6 $32,544.7
Sales and reinvestments ........................... 3,994.9 4,638.6 3,506.7
Redemptions and withdrawals ....................... (6,715.9) (2,804.6) (5,304.8)
Market (depreciation) appreciation ................ 2,993.0 (3,113.2) (1,976.0)
---------------------------------
Assets under management, end of year(3)(4) ........ $27,763.4 $27,491.4 $28,770.6
=================================
- ----------
(1) During 2003, our international fund operation was sold.
(2) Includes $1,612.0 million, $1,234.6 million and $1,120.1 million of assets
managed by subsidiaries for our general account as of January 1, 2003,
2002 and 2001, respectively.
(3) Does not include $79.5 million, $383.1 million and $151.3 million of
general account cash and invested assets as of December 31, 2003, 2002 and
2001, respectively.
(4) Includes $2,603.0 million, $1,612.0 million and $1,234.6 million of assets
managed by subsidiaries for our general account for the year ended
December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively.
(5) Does not include $383.1 million, $151.3 million and $106.9 million of
general account cash and invested assets as of January 1, 2003, 2002 and
2001, respectively.
Distribution
We sell our investment management products and services through multiple
distribution channels. Marketing to pension funds, endowments, foundations and
other institutional clients is conducted primarily by our experienced sales
professionals and dedicated marketing and client relationship staff. Products
are also offered through independent marketing specialists, consulting firms,
and investment banking firms.
Competition
The institutional asset management industry is highly competitive. We
compete with other investment management firms, insurance companies, banks and
mutual fund companies, many of whom are larger and have greater resources than
us. Consolidation activity in recent years has increased the concentration of
competitors within the industry.
We believe the fundamental elements of competitive success are investment
performance and customer service. Our competitive strategy focuses on attracting
assets through superior performance. Consistent with this strategy, we
continually evaluate opportunities to develop internally, acquire, or divest
investment management units and strive to improve our investment management
products and services. In addition, we believe our leading role in
non-traditional asset classes helps to create a distinct and competitively
advantageous profile in the institutional asset management marketplace.
24
JOHN HANCOCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
Maritime Life Segment
Overview
The Maritime Life Segment comprises our consolidated Canadian operations,
principally those of our Canadian life insurance business, The Maritime Life
Assurance Company (Maritime Life). Maritime Life is the 7th largest Canadian
life insurance company based on total domestic assets under management at the
most recently available ranking, December 31, 2002. Maritime Life had $12.3
billion, $8.8 billion and $8.6 billion in assets under management at December
31, 2003, 2002 and 2001. In the first quarter of 2003, the Company implemented
organizational changes within the Corporate and Other Segment that resulted in
reporting the Maritime Life business as its own operating segment for the first
time. The reclassifications associated with the realignment of the operating
segments had no impact on segment after-tax operating income, or net income of
the Maritime Life, or Corporate and Other Segments, other than to display these
businesses separately.
On March 12, 2003, Maritime Life announced the acquisition of the group
life, disability and health and individual health business of Liberty Health, a
Canadian branch of US-based Liberty Mutual Group. This transaction, valued at
approximately $97.5 million, was effective on July 1, 2003. This positions
Maritime Life as one of the top three providers of group life and health
benefits in Canada while the direct marketed individual health business is a new
business opportunity for Maritime Life.
Maritime Life offers a variety of personal life insurance, disability and
critical illness insurance, investment products, pension and retirement
solutions, and group life and health products and services. It operates through
four business divisions: the Retail Division, comprised of individual life,
disability and investment products, the Pension & Group Investments Division,
comprised of group immediate and deferred annuities and other institutional
products, the Group Division, comprised of group life, accident and sickness
benefits and the Specialty Markets Division, comprised of individual life and
health protection sold through direct marketing, associations and affinity
groups. For segmented reporting purposes, our business segments are now reported
as: Retail Protection, Asset Gathering, Group Life & Health and Corporate &
Other.
The businesses in the Maritime Life Segment have been aligned with the
Company's reporting segments as follows: Retail Protection includes all
individual life, disability, health and dental protection products; Asset
Gathering includes all individual investment, group immediate and deferred
annuities, structured settlements and other financial products aimed at
institutional investors; Group Life & Health includes all group life, accident
and sickness protection; and the Corporate & Other sub-segment.
The Maritime Life Segment contributed 15.5%, 13.7% and 11.5% of
consolidated operating revenue and 11.1%, 8.4% and 5.9% of consolidated
after-tax operating income in the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001,
respectively. The Maritime Life Segment generated operating revenue of $1,558.0
million, $1,222.7 million and $1,076.4 million and segment after-tax operating
income of $105.1 million, $69.0 million ad $47.9 million in 2003, 2002 and 2001
respectively. The Maritime Life Segment has achieved the following financial
results for the periods indicated:
25
JOHN HANCOCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
As of or for the Years Ended December 31,
-----------------------------------------
2003 2002 2001
---- ---- ----
(in millions)
Sales:(1)
Annualized premium from individual life and health insurance sales ... $ 54.3 $ 45.7 $ 48.3
Annualized premium from group insurance sales, including extensions .. 84.4 81.2 75.0
General fund deposits including group pensions ....................... 274.1 177.3 147.2
Segregated fund deposits ............................................. 339.4 377.4 418.1
Assets:
Retail Protection .................................................... $ 5,216.4 $ 3,791.3 $ 3,640.0
Asset Gathering ...................................................... 6,542.5 4,768.7 5,024.0
Group Life & Health .................................................. 1,875.3 1,417.3 1,369.7
Corporate & Other .................................................... 835.2 559.4 473.1
-----------------------------------------
Total ....................................................... $14,469.4 $10,536.7 $10,506.8
=========================================
Assets Under Management:
Retail Protection .................................................... $ 3,843.6 $ 2,755.4 $ 2,479.5
Asset Gathering ...................................................... 6,330.7 4,624.8 4,910.2
Group Life & Health .................................................. 1,553.6 1,028.3 972.0
Corporate & Other .................................................... 552.9 343.4 229.1
-----------------------------------------
Total ...................................................... $12,280.8 $ 8,751.9 $ 8,590.8
=========================================
- ----------
(1) Sales represent a measure, defined by LIMRA, of the amount of new business
sold during the period rather than a measure of revenue.
Products, Markets and Distribution
The following is a discussion of products and markets for the Maritime
Life Segment by Maritime Life's reporting segments.
Retail Protection Segment
In its Retail Protection segment, Maritime Life sells and/or administers a
range of individual insurance products including individual life insurance on
both a participating and non-participating basis. Maritime Life markets its
individual life and its individual investment products through a network of over
93 independent general agencies, National Accounts (a network of national
financial services providers) as well as through its affiliate, Equinox
Financial Group Inc. ("Equinox"). Maritime Life markets its individual life and
health products through the channels mentioned above as well as direct access
channels, association and affinity groups and through a direct call center.
Equinox is an independent marketing organization in the Canadian life
insurance market. Equinox sells insurance products supplied by various insurance
companies through its network of independent agents. Equinox also acts as a
third-party administrator for insurance carriers, providing value-added services
such as information technology, field management, compensation administration,
producer training, and sales/marketing support on a variable cost basis as an
alternative to the associated fixed costs which otherwise would have to be
incurred by its insurance carrier suppliers.
Life Insurance
Individual life insurance products include traditional whole life and term
life products, as well as universal life insurance. Whole life insurance plans
provide benefits at death and also build-up non-forfeiture values that may be
used as collateral for loans or as a source of income if protection needs have
diminished. Term insurance policies provide benefits at death within a specified
period. Unlike whole life insurance, term insurance generally does not build up
any cash value but the premiums are considerably lower.
A participating policy is a life insurance policy in which the
policyholder, by way of dividends, shares in the earnings attributable to the
participating business. A participating life insurance policy has higher premium
rates than a comparable non-
26
JOHN HANCOCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
participating policy under which no policyholder dividends are payable. Whole
life plans are offered on both a participating and a non-participating basis.
Term plans normally have been offered on a non-participating basis only.
Universal life (UL) products combine life insurance with an investment
accumulation option. Maritime Life has a variety of UL products from both
internal product design activities ("Intrepid" brand) and from its recent
acquisitions of Aetna Canada ("Architect" brand) and RSAF ("Champion" and "Life
Saver" brands). To combat customer confusion and simplify its product offerings,
Maritime Life introduced "Universal Solutions", a new product that combines the
best features of Maritime Life's existing UL products.
The target market for insurance products includes individuals and families
with household incomes in excess of $75,000. Based upon a LIMRA survey, at
December 31, 2002 Maritime Life ranked 8th in new sales in Canada for individual
insurance products.
Living Benefits
Maritime Life also sells individual critical illness and disability income
products in its Retail Protection segment. These products help individuals
protect their financial security against unexpected events or illnesses such as
heart attack and stroke. The critical illness product, "Critical Needs",
provides lump-sum benefits when policyholders have life-changing health events
to help offset medical expenses or provide extra funds in those times of severe
stress due to illness or accident. Maritime Life ranked 3rd in new sales in
Canada in each of its Living Benefits product offerings, according to LIMRA, at
December 31, 2002.
Individual Health
Maritime Life sells individual health products aimed at meeting the
emerging gap between government-funded health plans in Canada. Sales are through
agents, brokers and general agencies as well as direct to customer and through
affinity partners and professional associations.
Asset Gathering Segment
In its Asset Gathering segment, Maritime Life offers investment products
that include annuities, offered on both an immediate and deferred basis,
guaranteed savings, and segregated fund investments. According to a December 31,
2002 LIMRA survey, it ranked 5th in new sales in Canada of individual investment
products.
Investment Products
The payment of income commences at the time the policy is issued for
immediate annuities; on deferred annuities, deposits are accrued to produce
income at a later date.
Each deferred annuity policyholder has the option of placing funds in the
general funds of Maritime Life under which the principal and interest rates are
guaranteed, or in one or more of Maritime Life's segregated funds or in pooled
fund trusts, under the administration of Maritime Life, which contracts the
portfolio management to selected investment managers.
Segregated Funds
Segregated funds are investment products, offered only by insurance
companies, which provide the benefits of mutual funds with capital protection
opportunities, including probate bypass, creditor protection and guarantees at
death and maturity. As at December 31, 2003, Maritime Life managed 133
segregated funds in Canada, consisting of "pooled funds", where the assets of
the fund are held for a number of group and individual clients. Each pooled fund
is invested in a separate portfolio of short-term investments, bonds, stocks,
derivatives or a mixture of these assets. The investments of each of these funds
are segregated from the general fund assets of Maritime Life and are available
to meet only those liabilities under the policies for which the funds are
maintained.
Segregated funds are carried at market values. The clients of these funds
bear the full investment risks of, and receive all the benefits from, the assets
of the fund except to the extent of guarantees provided by Maritime Life.
Maritime Life's individual segregated fund products offer a guarantee of minimum
proceeds on the maturity date of the policy or on the earlier death of the
27
JOHN HANCOCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
annuitant, depending upon the risk profile of the segregated fund investment.
Maritime Life earns fees for its investment management of these funds and also
charges a fee for the maturity and death benefit guarantees offered. For the
year ended December 31, 2003, these fees totaled approximately $69.0 million.
The fees charged vary depending upon the size and nature of the fund.
Maritime Life has a strategic alliance with Talvest Fund Management Inc.
("Talvest"), a Canadian mutual fund management company. This alliance involves a
series of segregated funds marketed as the "Synchrony" family of funds through
the Talvest distribution channel. Each Synchrony fund is constructed by
combining units of Maritime Life and Talvest funds to create a fund (a
"fund-of-funds") with desired investment attributes covering five different
investor profiles. This mix combines Talvest's tactical asset allocation
expertise with Maritime Life's segregated fund experience and unique principal
deposit guarantees.
Maritime Life also has negotiated additional strategic alliances with
three other mutual fund companies: AGF Management Limited, AIM Funds Management
Limited and Fidelity Investments Canada Limited as well as another mutual fund
alliance with Talvest Fund Management. These alliances make available to
customers of Maritime Life a series of "Partnership funds" with all the benefits
of mutual funds combined with the unique benefits of segregated funds.
Pensions
Also included in its Asset Gathering sub-segment are pension plan products
sold to employers and association groups. The pension investment products
include: defined contribution pension plans; group retirement savings plans;
investment fund management for defined benefit plans and other investments.
Maritime Life also has a large block of single premium group annuities. Most of
Maritime Life's group annuity business is sold in Canada to corporate pension
plans registered as such under the Income Tax Act (Canada).
The defined contribution and group retirement savings plans accumulate
savings for employees of pension plan sponsors. The funding of these plans is
made by the employer or association and usually includes contributions from both
the employer and their employees. There is stability in this product line as
pensions are long-term savings by nature. For defined contribution plans, there
are legislative restrictions on withdrawing money from the plan, which affects
persistency for this block of business. The single premium group annuities are
both deferred and immediate annuities, the latter requiring regular payment,
usually monthly, to annuitants.
The investment options available for this business include a complete line
of segregated funds and a full line of guaranteed investment options through the
general funds of Maritime Life. Maritime Life earns fees for its management of
these pooled funds based upon the market values of the underlying funds.
Institutional Products
In 2002, Maritime Life expanded its annuity business by targeting the
needs of institutional investors. Incremental new sales of $143.0 million were
recorded in 2003 and $223.5 million was recorded for 2002. These sales have
resulted in increased provisions for future policy liabilities and accordingly
do not result in significant profits in the year of issue, but will provide
spread-based profit opportunity for future years. The maximum amount of such
annuities that Maritime Life may issue under its current institutional program
is $1.2 billion. The investment and U.S. GAAP accounting functions associated
with this program have been outsourced to the John Hancock Life Insurance
Company and accordingly the financial reporting for these annuities are not
reflected in the Maritime Life segment but rather are included in the G&SFP
segment.
Group Life & Health Segment
Maritime Life sells a wide range of group life, disability and health
plans, primarily to employer and association groups. These plans include group
term life, short term and long-term disability and medical and dental insurance.
Health premiums, and to a lesser extent life premiums, increase due to
salary levels and health care cost inflation, as well as changing health care
attitudes and availability of new, expensive pharmaceuticals. Life premiums
change in response to mortality experience and work force aging, while long-term
disability premiums are influenced by salary levels, claims experience and
general demographics. Most group coverages are issued under contracts that
provide for a periodic re-determination of premium levels, usually on an annual
basis. Businesses and associations with Maritime Life group coverage at December
31, 2003 totaled approximately 4,563 representing more than 1,956,000 employees.
28
JOHN HANCOCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
Recognizing the significant impact of inflation on the cost of healthcare,
Maritime Life examines healthcare inflationary trends and uses experience rating
for virtually all of its group health plans. Experience rating means that the
premium rate for a group is affected by its own claims experience. For refund
policies, this means that a customer shares in either the increased or reduced
claims experience. For non-refund policies, the historical claims experience
will influence future premium levels.
Group life, disability and health coverage is distributed primarily
through brokers and consultants to medium and large size Canadian employers.
Maritime Life's competitive positioning at December 31, 2002, prior to the
assumption of the Liberty Health group business, was 4th in Canada in terms of
new sales, including coverage extensions, according to an annual survey by the
Fraser Group.
The table below shows Maritime Life Segment sales by distribution channel
for the periods indicated. Sales is a non-GAAP measure. Sales refer to premiums
and deposits received by Maritime Life and are not reflective of revenue on
Maritime Life's income statement. GAAP refers to the application of accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States. A non-GAAP measure refers to
a financial metric relevant to Company performance but not appearing in Maritime
Life's GAAP financial statements.
Maritime Life Segment Sales by Distribution Channel
For the Years Ended December 31,
--------------------------------
2003 2002 2001
---- ---- ----
(in millions)
Independent General Agents (1)
Individual life ............................ $ 17.4 $ 18.2 $ 22.2
Individual health .......................... 9.5 6.2 4.3
Investment products ........................ 311.3 296.8 291.0
Equinox:
Individual life ............................ 8.9 8.8 9.4
Individual health .......................... 3.3 3.3 2.8
Investment products ........................ 114.5 109.5 124.0
National Accounts/financial institutions:
Individual life ............................ 8.6 8.6 9.2
Individual health .......................... 0.8 0.6 0.4
Investment products ........................ 54.0 59.8 16.1
Broker/TPA/Employers:
Group life and health ...................... 67.4 74.2 68.4
Group pensions ............................. 131.1 81.6 86.6
Other (3) ........................................... 25.4 14.0 54.2
--------------------------------
Total ...................................... $752.2 $681.6 $688.6
================================
- ----------
(1) Includes managing general agencies and independent general agents.
(2) Includes all sales through a wholly-owned subsidiary, Equinox Financial
Group Inc.
(3) Includes direct and call center sales for individual health,
administrative only services and affinity group sales for group customers
and mutual fund alliances for segregated fund products.
Reserves
Maritime Life establishes and reports liabilities for future policy
benefits on the balance sheet to meet its obligations under its insurance
policies and investment products. The liability for universal life insurance
products, variable annuity and deferred fixed annuity contracts is equal to the
cumulative account balances. Cumulative account balances include deposits plus
credited interest or change in investment value less expense and mortality fees,
as applicable, and withdrawals. Future policy benefits on the traditional term,
whole life, single premium and fixed immediate annuity contracts are calculated
based on a set of actuarial assumptions that are established and maintained
throughout the lives of the contracts. The assumptions include investment
yields, mortality, morbidity and expenses.
Pricing of Products
Premium rates for life, health and annuity products, both individual and
group, are based on assumptions of future mortality, morbidity, investment
returns, expenses and policy terminations, to which specific margins for profit
and risks are
29
JOHN HANCOCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
added. The profitability of the products is affected by the variation of actual
experience from the assumed experience, subject to any repricing flexibility
available for certain products.
Underwriting and Reinsurance
The risk sharing resulting from reinsurance is beneficial primarily in
that the exposure on any one claim is kept within acceptable limits. Maritime
Life has arrangements with various reinsurers that permit it to issue policies
that exceed its currently approved insurance retention limit of $2.3 million.
Although liable for the total policy benefits, Maritime Life is reimbursed for
the reinsured portion of the benefits by the reinsurer. At December 31, 2003,
Maritime Life has ceded approximately $65.3 billion of its total face amount of
life and health insurance policies then in force to non-affiliated companies.
On January 13, 2003, Maritime Life entered into an agreement to recapture
significant portions of its Group Life, Accidental Death and Dismemberment and
Long-Term Disability reinsurance. This agreement was settled on January 17, 2003
for total proceeds of $172.8 million, including the receipt of $115.3 million of
cash and invested assets and the concurrent settlement of a note payable
obligation of $57.4 million. This change in retention is in accordance with
Maritime Life's Board-approved retention policy.
Competition
Maritime Life faces substantial competition in all aspects of its
business. The Canadian financial services business is highly competitive.
Maritime Life competes with a large number of insurance companies, investment
management firms, mutual fund companies, banks and others in the sale of
annuities and for mutual fund business with hundreds of fund companies. Many of
its competitors in the mutual fund industry are larger, have been established
for a longer period of time, offer less expensive products, have deeper
penetration in key distribution channels and have more resources than Maritime
Life.
Competition in the Canadian financial services business is based on
several factors. These include investment performance and the ability to
successfully penetrate distribution channels, to offer effective service to
intermediaries and consumers, to develop products to meet the changing needs of
various consumer segments, to charge competitive fees and to control expenses.
Management believes the Maritime Life Segment will continue to use the
following competitive strategies:
o develop innovative new products aimed at meeting customers' changing
needs;
o expand into new markets;
o provide excellent service to investors and distributors; and
o deliver strong investment performance
Government Regulation
Maritime Life is governed by the Insurance Companies Act (Canada) (the
"ICA"). The ICA is administered, and companies governed by the ICA are
supervised, by the Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions
("OSFI"). The ICA permits insurance companies to offer, through subsidiaries and
networking arrangements, a broad range of financial services. The ICA and the
regulations thereunder contain restrictions on the purchase or other
acquisition, issue, transfer and voting of the shares of an insurance company.
The ICA requires the filing of annual and other reports on the financial
condition of Maritime Life, provides for periodic examinations of Maritime
Life's affairs, imposes restrictions on transactions with related parties, and
sets forth requirements governing reserves for actuarial liabilities and the
safekeeping of assets and other matters. Maritime Life deals with all issues
raised by OSFI in its periodic examinations, and Maritime Life believes it has
responded appropriately to past recommendations.
Provincial Insurance Regulation
Maritime Life is also subject to provincial regulation and supervision in
each of the provinces and territories of Canada in which it carries on
business. Provincial insurance regulation is concerned primarily with the form
of insurance contracts and the sale and marketing of insurance and annuity
products, including the licensing and supervision of insurance distributors.
Individual variable insurance and annuity products and the underlying segregated
funds (separate accounts) to which they relate are subject to guidelines adopted
by the Canadian Council of Insurance Regulators and incorporated by reference
into provincial insurance regulations. These guidelines govern a number of
matters relating to the sale of these products and the administration of the
underlying segregated funds.
30
JOHN HANCOCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
Provincial Securities Laws
The preferred shares of Maritime Life are listed and posted for trading on
The Toronto Stock Exchange. Maritime Life is subject to provincial securities
laws and to regulation by The Toronto Stock Exchange.
For a further description of operating results, see Management's
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations--Maritime Life Segment, included elsewhere in this Form 10-K.
31
JOHN HANCOCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
Corporate and Other Segment
Overview
Our Corporate and Other Segment consists primarily of our international
operations, corporate operations, including the holding company, John Hancock
Financial Services (JHFS), and non-core businesses that are either in the
process of winding down (i.e., are in "run-off") or have been divested. This
segment contributed approximately 9.8%, 8.7% and 8.6% of consolidated operating
revenues and (5.6)%, 1.4% and 4.6% of consolidated segment after-tax operating
income in the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively. The
Corporate and Other Segment generated revenues of $987.7 million, $775.0 million
and $808.5 million and segment after-tax operating income of $(53.3) million,
$11.4 million and $36.8 million in 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively.
The Corporate and Other Segment assets are summarized below:
For the Years Ended December 31,
--------------------------------
2003 2002 2001
---- ---- ----
(in millions)
Assets:
International operations ................ $ 974.2 $ 798.0 $ 614.7
Corporate operations .................... 8,349.5 7,940.0 7,010.7
Non-core businesses ..................... 1,280.7 1,060.6 1,004.0
Intra-segment eliminations .............. (7,308.1) (6,593.3) (4,923.4)
-----------------------------------
Total .......................... $ 3,296.3 $ 3,205.3 $ 3,706.0
===================================
International Operations
The Maritime Life Assurance Company (Maritime Life) is shown as a separate
segment for 2003. The prior year numbers shown here have been restated to
reflect this change. Our international operations also offer individual life and
group insurance and pension products through local affiliates doing business in
five Asian countries. In addition, we have formed a joint venture life insurance
company in China, which provide us an early foothold in this emerging economy
with its vast population. The joint venture company's license initially is
restricted to operations in the city of Shanghai, China. As of December 31,
2003, the Company's net investment in these Asian affiliates was $48.1 million.
Working with an international network of 52 insurers, we also coordinate
and/or reinsure group life, health, disability and pension coverage for foreign
and globally mobile employees of multinational companies in 51 countries and
territories.
Corporate Operations
Corporate operations consist principally of (1) revenues and expense of
the holding company, investment and treasury activities, and assets, investment
income, interest expense and other expenses not specifically allocated to
segments or the holding company level and (2) group life insurance operations
through May 1, 2003. The corporate operations investment activity is focused on
tax-preferenced investing which may generate lower pre-tax investments income
but yields higher returns on an after-tax basis. We sold our group life
insurance business effective May 1, 2003, it generated $39.2 million, $154.1
million and $225.8 million in premiums in the years ended December 31, 2003,
2002, and 2001 respectively. Also included in corporate operations are the
revenues and expenses of Signature Fruit, a subsidiary of the Company, which
purchased certain assets and assumed certain liabilities out of bankruptcy
proceedings of Tri Valley Growers, Inc., a cooperative association, for
approximately $53.0 million on April 1, 2001. Signature Fruit generated $254.4
million, $235.9 million and $177.8 million in revenues, $257.8 million, $240.7
million and $183.1 million in expenses, and $(2.2) million, $(3.1) million, and
$(2.4) million in after-tax operating losses for the years ended December 31,
2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively. Long-Term Care Partners, a new initiative
done in conjunction with the Federal Government's long-term care insurance
program in 2002, is now shown in the Protection Segment. The prior year numbers
shown here have been restated to reflect this change. In 2003 the after-tax
impact of currency fluctuations between U.S. and Canadian dollars related to the
operations of Maritime Life is being reported in corporate operations. Maritime
Life's currency fluctuations are included here in order to facilitate a better
understanding of the business drivers in the Maritime Life Segment discussion
and to reflect the corporate decision to manage foreign exchange in this manner.
The operations of the Maritime Life Segment have been reclassified to its own
operating segment.
32
JOHN HANCOCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
Non-Core Businesses
We have certain non-core businesses that have been divested or put in
run-off, reflecting a strategic decision to focus on our retail and investment
management businesses. Non-core businesses consist primarily of run-off property
and casualty insurance companies that were sold in 1999, a portion of our group
life and accident and health business and related subsidiaries that were sold in
1997, and other small subsidiaries in various stages of running-off their
operations.
For a further description of operating results, see Management's
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations--Corporate and Other Segment, included elsewhere in this Form 10-K.
33
JOHN HANCOCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
General Account Investments
General Account and Separate Accounts
Our investments include assets held in our general account and assets held
in numerous separate accounts. We manage our general account assets in
investment segments that support specific classes of product liabilities. These
investment segments permit us to implement investment policies that both support
the financial characteristics of the underlying liabilities and also provide
returns on our invested capital. The investment segments also enable us to gauge
the performance and profitability of our various business segments and product
lines.
Separate account assets are managed in accordance with specific investment
contracts. We generally do not bear any investment risk on assets held in
separate accounts, but rather receive investment management fees based on levels
of assets under management, measured at fair value, as well as mortality fees,
policy administration fees and surrender charges. Generally, assets held in
separate accounts are not available to satisfy general account obligations.
For a further description of our investments, see Management's Discussion
and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations--General Account
Investments, included elsewhere in this Form 10-K.
Ratings
Insurance companies are rated by rating agencies based upon factors
relevant to policyholders. Ratings provide both industry participants and
insurance consumers meaningful information on specific insurance companies.
Insurer financial strength (IFS) ratings are opinions of a company's ability to
pay obligations to policyholders and contractholders on a timely basis. IFS
ratings are based on many factors, both quantitative and qualitative, such as
evaluations of a company's balance sheet strength, operating performance,
business profile, liquidity, financial flexibility and management quality. As of
December 31, 2003, JHFS has been assigned an A+ (Strong) debt rating by Fitch,
an A (Strong) debt rating by Standard and Poor's, and an A3 (Good) debt rating
by Moody's. As of December 31, 2003, John Hancock Life Insurance Company and
John Hancock Variable Life Insurance Company are rated A++ (Superior, highest
rating) by A.M. Best, AA (Very Strong, third highest rating) by Fitch, AA (Very
Strong, third highest rating) by S&P, and Aa3 (Excellent, fourth highest rating)
by Moody's.
On September 28, 2003, JHFS entered into a definitive merger agreement
with Manulife. Until the closing of the transaction, the Company will continue
to operate independently and does not expect the proposed merger to have a
negative impact on financial condition, liquidity or sales. Following the
announcement of the proposed merger, Standard and Poor's, Moody's, A.M. Best and
Fitch affirmed all ratings. In addition, Standard & Poor's noted that "the `A'
long-term counterparty credit and senior debt ratings on John Hancock Financial
Services Inc., a holding company for its U.S. and Canadian operating insurance
companies, have been placed on CreditWatch with positive implications." Dominion
Bond Rating Service placed John Hancock Financial Services' corporate rating of
A (high) and Maritime Life's long-term ratings "Under Review - Positive." In
addition, Maritime Life's financial strength ratings were placed on "Credit
Watch Positive" by Moody's and A.M. Best.
We believe that our strong ratings are an important factor in marketing
our products to our distributors and customers, since ratings information is
broadly disseminated and generally used throughout the industry. Our ratings
reflect each rating agency's current opinion of our financial strength,
operating performance and ability to meet our obligations to policyholders, and
are not evaluations directed toward the protection of investors. Such ratings
are neither a rating of securities nor a recommendation to buy, hold or sell any
security, including our common stock.
34
JOHN HANCOCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
REGULATION
General
Our business is subject to extensive regulation at both the state and
Federal level, including regulation under state insurance and Federal and state
securities laws.
State Insurance Regulation
The Company and its insurance subsidiaries are subject to supervision and
regulation by the insurance authorities in each jurisdiction in which they
transact business. Currently, we are licensed to transact business in all fifty
states, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, the U.S. Virgin Islands, Guam,
the Northern Mariana Islands, 5 Canadian provinces, and several Asian countries,
including one city in the People's Republic of China and therefore are subject
to regulation in all these jurisdictions. Most states have laws and regulations
governing such issues as: what lines of business a company may engage in;
underwriting practices, including a company's ability to request results of
applicants' genetic tests; what premium rates may be charged in various lines of
business; what products a company may sell; mandating certain insurance benefits
and policy forms; minimum rates for accumulation of cash values and maximum
rates for policy loans; licensing of insurance companies and agents; advertising
and marketing practices; statutory accounting and reporting requirements;
reserve requirements and solvency standards; admitted statutory assets; the
appropriate mix of investments; dividend payments; transactions with affiliates;
and level of ownership regarding acquisitions of control. State insurance
departments periodically review the business and operations of an insurance
company by examining its financial condition and how its agents sell its
products. Our insurance subsidiaries are also required to file various reports
relating to their financial condition, including quarterly filings and detailed
annual financial statements. This is required in each jurisdiction where an
insurance business is licensed.
State insurance regulatory authorities and other state law enforcement
agencies and attorneys general from time to time make inquiries concerning
whether our insurance businesses are in compliance with the regulations covering
those businesses. We reasonably and promptly respond to such inquiries and take
corrective action if warranted.
In February 2004 the Massachusetts Division of Insurance completed its
routine regulatory statutory financial examination of John Hancock Life
Insurance Company and John Hancock Variable Life Insurance Company and issued
its report for the years 1998 through 2002. The findings of these examinations
did not have a material impact on our financial condition or results of
operations.
The Massachusetts, New York and Vermont insurance departments have ongoing
market conduct examinations involving John Hancock Life Insurance Company and
John Hancock Variable Life Insurance Company. These insurance departments and
others periodically conduct examinations of insurers that transact business in
their jurisdictions. The Company believes that it conducts its business in
accordance with all applicable state regulations and does not expect that the
outcome of these examinations will have a material impact on our business,
financial condition or results of operations. The Massachusetts Division of
Insurance has completed its Market Conduct Examination and issued its report in
February without any material findings.
State insurance regulators and the National Association of Insurance
Commissioners are continually re-examining existing laws and regulations. Among
other things, these laws and regulations may focus on insurance company
investments, financial reporting and solvency issues, risk-adjusted capital
guidelines, interpretations of existing laws, the development of new laws, the
implementation of non-statutory guidelines and the circumstances under which
dividends may be paid.
Regulation Governing Potential Acquisitions of Control
We are subject to regulation under the insurance holding company statutes
of the states in which our insurance subsidiaries are organized, principally
Massachusetts, which is the state of domicile for the Life Company. The
Massachusetts insurance law contains provisions which, in general, provide that
the acquisition or change of "control" of a domestic insurer or of any person
that controls a domestic insurer cannot be consummated without the prior
approval of the Massachusetts Commissioner of Insurance. In general, a
presumption of "control" arises from the ownership, control, possession with the
power to vote or possession of proxies with respect to, 10% or more of the
voting securities of an insurer or of a person that controls an insurer. A
person seeking to acquire control, directly or indirectly, of a Massachusetts
insurance company or of any person controlling a Massachusetts insurance company
must file an application for approval of the acquisition of control with the
Massachusetts Commissioner of Insurance and obtain the approval of the
Massachusetts Commissioner of Insurance before consummating the acquisition.
35
JOHN HANCOCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
The restrictions described above may deter, delay or prevent a future
acquisition of control, including transactions that could be perceived as
advantageous to our shareholders.
Regulation of Dividends and Other Payments from Insurance Subsidiaries
JHFS is a holding company and its primary assets are the outstanding
capital stock of John Hancock Life Insurance Company, along with Maritime Life
and several other international subsidiaries. As an insurance holding company,
JHFS depends primarily on dividends from John Hancock Life Insurance Company to
pay dividends to its shareholders, and pay operating expenses and implement its
capital management strategies. Any inability of John Hancock Life Insurance
Company to pay dividends to JHFS in the future in an amount sufficient for JHFS
to pay dividends to its shareholders, implement some of its capital management
plans or meet its cash obligations may materially adversely affect the market
price of its common stock and its business, financial condition or results of
operations.
The Massachusetts insurance law limits how and when John Hancock Life
Insurance Company can pay dividends to JHFS. Under the Massachusetts insurance
law, no insurer may pay any shareholder dividend from any source other than
statutory unassigned funds without the prior approval of the Massachusetts
Commissioner of Insurance. The Massachusetts insurance holding company act
requires that notification be given to the Massachusetts Commissioner of
Insurance no later than five days following declaration, and at least ten days'
prior to payment, of any dividend or distribution by a Massachusetts insurance
company. Further, this act provides that no extraordinary dividend may be paid
without thirty days' prior written notice to the Massachusetts Commissioner of
Insurance, and only if the Massachusetts Commissioner of Insurance has not
disapproved, or has approved, the payment within the thirty day notice period.
An extraordinary dividend is any dividend or distribution of cash or other
property whose fair market value, together with other dividends or distributions
made within the preceding twelve months, exceeds the greater of (1) 10% of an
insurance company's surplus as regards policyholders as of the preceding
December 31, or (2) a life insurance company's statutory net gain from
operations for the twelve months ending on the preceding December 31. Although
not currently viewed as such, John Hancock Life Insurance Company, in the
future, could also be viewed as being commercially domiciled in New York and, if
so, dividend payments may also be subject to New York's insurance holding
company act as well as Massachusetts law.
Surplus and Capital Requirements
Insurance regulators have the discretionary authority, in connection with
the ongoing licensing of our insurance businesses, to limit or prohibit the
ability to issue new policies if, in the regulators' judgment, the insurer is
not maintaining a minimum amount of surplus or is in hazardous financial
condition. Limits may also be established on the ability to issue new life
insurance policies and annuity contracts above an amount based upon the face
amount and premiums of policies of a similar type issued in the prior year.
Risk-Based Capital
The National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC) has established
risk-based capital (RBC) standards for life insurance companies as well as a
model act to apply such standards at the state level. The model act provides
that life insurance companies must submit an annual risk-based capital report to
state regulators reporting their risk-based capital based on five categories of
risk: asset risk-affiliates, asset risk-other, insurance risk, interest rate
risk and business risk. The formula is intended to be used by insurance
regulators as an early warning tool to identify possible weakly capitalized
companies for purposes of initiating further regulatory action.
In 2001, the NAIC changed the risked-based capital formula, which resulted
in lower RBC charges or a higher risk-based capital ratio. The most significant
change made by NAIC is to tax effect the RBC, which is similar to reducing the
risk factors being applied to the different risk categories. One other change
was the creation of a common stock asset risk category and its treatment in the
covariance calculation. This change also lowered RBC. John Hancock took certain
actions to improve the risk-based capital ratio. The two most significant
actions were the partial reinsurance of the closed block and the upstreaming of
some of the Life Company's foreign insurance affiliates to JHFS. John Hancock
Life Insurance Company exceeded the level of risk-based capital that would
require it to propose actions to correct a deficiency by 212 percent as of
December 31, 2003.
36
JOHN HANCOCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
Statutory Investment Valuation Reserves
Life insurance companies are required to establish an asset valuation
reserve (AVR) consisting of two components: (i) a "default component," which
provides for future credit-related losses on fixed maturity investments, and
(ii) an "equity component," which provides for losses on all types of equity
investments, including equity securities and real estate. Insurers also are
required to establish an interest maintenance reserve (IMR) for net realized
capital gains and losses on fixed maturity securities, net of tax, related to
changes in interest rates. The IMR is required to be amortized into statutory
earnings on a basis reflecting the remaining period to maturity of the fixed
maturity securities sold. These reserves are required by state insurance
regulatory authorities to be established as a liability on a life insurer's
statutory financial statements, but do not affect our financial statements
prepared in accordance with GAAP. Although future additions to AVR will reduce
the future statutory capital and surplus of John Hancock Life Insurance Company,
we do not believe that the impact under current regulations of such reserve
requirements will materially affect the ability of John Hancock Life Insurance
Company to increase its statutory capital and surplus and pay future dividends
to John Hancock Financial Services, Inc.
IRIS Ratios
The National Association of Insurance Commissioners has developed a set of
financial tests known as the Insurance Regulatory Information System (IRIS) for
early identification of companies which may require special attention by
insurance regulators. Insurance companies submit data on an annual basis to the
National Association of Insurance Commissioners. This data is used to calculate
ratios covering various categories of financial data, with defined "usual
ranges" for each category. IRIS consists of 13 key financial ratios for life
insurance companies. An insurance company may fall out of the usual range with
respect to one or more ratios because of specific transactions that are in
themselves immaterial or eliminated at the consolidated level. Departure from
the usual range on four or more of the ratios may lead to inquiries from
individual states' insurance departments. During the five-year period ended
December 31, 2003, John Hancock Life Insurance Company was outside the usual
range for Net Change in Capital Surplus ratio for the year 2000, and the Change
in Product Mix and Change in Reserving ratios in 2001. The Change in Capital
Surplus ratio fell outside the usual range in 2000 because of the
demutualization transaction. Specifically, under the applicable statutory
accounting rules, the Company was required to exclude the proceeds from the
stock offering from surplus while the demutualization consideration paid in cash
was deducted from surplus, thereby distorting the ratio. This adjustment did not
recur in the years 2003, 2002 and 2001. The unusual ratios in 2001 were the
result of the implementation of new statutory accounting rules and are not
expected to recur. During the same period, John Hancock Variable Life Insurance
Company and Investors Partner Life Insurance Company, which are wholly owned
direct and indirect subsidiaries of John Hancock Life Insurance Company,
respectively, had several ratios outside of the usual range. John Hancock
Variable Life Insurance Company had eight unusual ratios, all of which resulted
from growth in the business and the effect of reinsurance contracts with John
Hancock Life Insurance Company. Investors Partner Life Insurance Company had ten
unusual ratios due to the fact it writes no new business.
Regulation of Investments
Our insurance businesses are subject to state laws and regulations that
require diversification of their investment portfolios. Some of these laws and
regulations also limit the amount of investments in specified investment
categories, such as below investment grade fixed maturity securities, equity
real estate, other equity investments and derivatives. Failure to comply with
these laws and regulations would cause investments exceeding regulatory
limitations to be treated as nonadmitted assets for purposes of measuring
statutory surplus, in some instances, requiring divestiture. State regulatory
authorities from the domiciliary states of our insurance subsidiaries have not
indicated any non-compliance with any such regulations.
Valuation of Life Insurance Policies Model Regulation
The National Association of Insurance Commissioners has adopted a revision
to the Valuation of Life Insurance Policies Model Regulation (known as Revised
XXX). This model regulation established new minimum statutory reserve
requirements for certain individual life insurance policies written in the
future. Massachusetts adopted the Regulation effective January 1, 2001 and we
established increased reserves to be consistent with the new minimum standards
with respect to policies issued after the effective date of the regulation. In
addition, we revised our term life insurance products with guaranteed premium
periods and are in the process of revising and expanding our universal life
insurance products with no-lapse guarantees.
37
JOHN HANCOCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
Federal Insurance Initiatives and Legislation
Although the Federal government generally does not directly regulate the
insurance business, Federal initiatives often have an impact on our business.
Current and proposed measures that may significantly affect the insurance
business generally include limitations on anti-trust immunity, minimum solvency
requirements and health care reform.
On November 12, 1999, the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act of 1999 became law,
implementing fundamental changes in the regulation of the financial services
industry in the United States. The act permits the transformation of the already
converging banking, insurance and securities industries by permitting mergers
that combine commercial banks, insurers and securities firms under one holding
company. Under the act, national banks retain their existing ability to sell
insurance products in some circumstances. In addition, bank holding companies
that qualify and elect to be treated as "financial holding companies" may engage
in activities, and acquire companies engaged in activities, that are "financial"
in nature or "incidental" or "complementary" to such financial activities,
including acting as principal, agent or broker in selling life, property and
casualty and other forms of insurance, including annuities. A financial holding
company can own any kind of insurance company or insurance broker or agent, but
its bank subsidiary cannot own the insurance company. Under state law, the
financial holding company would need to apply to the insurance commissioner in
the insurer's state of domicile for prior approval of the acquisition of the
insurer, and the act provides that the commissioner, in considering the
application, may not discriminate against the financial holding company because
it is affiliated with a bank. Under the act, no state may prevent or interfere
with affiliations between banks and insurers, insurance agents or brokers, or
the licensing of a bank or affiliate as an insurer or agent or broker.
On October 26, 2001, the International Money Laundering Abatement and
Anti-Terrorist Financing Act of 2001 was enacted into law as part of the USA
PATRIOT Act. Among its many provisions the law requires that financial
institutions adopt anti-money laundering programs that include policies,
procedures and controls to detect and prevent money laundering, designate a
compliance officer to oversee the program and provide for employee training, and
periodic audits in accordance with regulations to be issued by the U.S. Treasury
Department. The Company has developed a program designed to fully comply with
the applicable provisions of the Act and the related Treasury Regulations.
Tax Legislation
Currently, under the Internal Revenue Code, holders of many life insurance
and annuity products, including both traditional and variable products, are
entitled to tax-favored treatment on these products. For example, income tax
payable by policyholders on investment earnings under traditional and variable
life insurance and annuity products which are owned by natural persons is
deferred during the product's accumulation period and is payable, if at all,
only when the insurance or annuity benefits are actually paid or to be paid.
Also, for example, interest on loans up to $50,000 secured by the cash value of
life insurance policies owned by businesses on key employees is eligible for
deduction even though investment earnings during the accumulation period are
tax-deferred.
In the past, legislation has been proposed that would have curtailed the
tax-favored treatment of some of our insurance and annuity products. If any such
proposals were enacted, market demand for such products would be adversely
affected. In addition, the Economic Growth and Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of
2001 (EGTRRA), enacted by Congress in 2001, provides for the gradual reduction
and eventual elimination of Federal estate taxes by the year 2010. But EGTRRA
also contains a sunset provision, which would reinstate Federal estate taxes in
the year 2011, based on the Internal Revenue Code in effect prior to the
enactment of EGTRRA. Many insurance products are designed and sold to help
policyholders reduce the effect of Federal estate taxation on their estates. The
enactment of EGTRRA has adversely affected sales of certain of our insurance and
investment advisory products, but this effect is mitigated somewhat by the
sunset provision. If the sunset provision of EGTRRA is eliminated in the future,
the adverse affect on the sales of these products could increase. In addition,
sales of split dollar life insurance products have been adversely affected by
proposed changes being considered by the Internal Revenue Service. Recently the
President of the United States of America has also put forth proposals that
would significantly increase tax-favored savings vehicles for individuals. These
proposals, if enacted in their current forms, could adversely affect the sale of
our tax-favored annuity products.
38
JOHN HANCOCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
Securities Laws
Certain of our investment advisory activities are subject to Federal and
state securities laws and regulations. Our mutual funds are registered under the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "Securities Act"), and the Investment
Company Act. All of our separate investment accounts that fund retail variable
annuity contracts and retail variable life insurance products issued by us,
other than those which fund private placement investment options that are exempt
from registration or support fixed rate investment options that are also exempt
from registration, are registered both under the Securities Act and the
Investment Company Act. Institutional products such as group annuity contracts,
guaranteed investment contracts and funding agreements are sold to tax qualified
pension plans or are sold to other sophisticated investors as "private
placements," and are exempt from registration under both acts. Some of our
subsidiaries are registered as broker/dealers under the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, as amended (the "Securities Exchange Act"), and with the National
Association of Securities Dealers, Inc., and a number are registered as
investment advisers under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940. One subsidiary is
registered as a commodity pool operator and as a commodity trading advisor under
the Commodity Exchange Act. Our insurance companies or other subsidiaries also
own or manage other investment vehicles that are exempt from registration under
the Securities Act and the Investment Company Act but may be subject to other
requirements of those laws, such as antifraud provisions and the terms of
applicable exemptions. We are also subject to similar laws and regulations in
the states and foreign countries in which we provide investment advisory
services, offer the products described above or non-variable life and annuity
products or conduct other securities and investment related activities.
Environmental Considerations
As owners and operators of real property, we are subject to extensive
Federal, state and local environmental laws and regulations. Inherent in such
ownership and operation is the risk that there may be potential environmental
liabilities and costs in connection with any required remediation of such
properties. When deemed appropriate, we routinely conduct environmental
assessments for real estate being acquired for investment and before taking
title to property acquired through foreclosure or deed in lieu of foreclosure.
Based on these environmental assessments and compliance with our internal
environmental procedures, we believe that any costs associated with compliance
with environmental laws and regulations or any remediation of such properties
would not be material to our consolidated financial position or results of
operations. Furthermore, although we hold equity positions in subsidiaries and
investments that could potentially be subject to environmental liabilities, we
believe, based on our assessment of the business and properties of these
companies and our level of involvement in the operation and management of such
companies, that we would not be subject to any environmental liabilities with
respect to these investments which would have a material adverse effect on our
business, financial position or results of operations.
ERISA Considerations
Certain of our lines of business, including our management of employee
benefit plan assets in our advisory capacity in separate accounts, are subject
to the requirements of ERISA. In addition, the Small Business Job Protection
Act, which we refer to as the SBJPA, offers insurers protection from potential
litigation exposure prompted by the 1993 U.S. Supreme Court decision in John
Hancock Mutual Life Insurance Company v. Harris Trust & Savings Bank, which we
refer to as the Harris Trust Decision, in which the Court held that, with
respect to a portion of the funds held under certain general account group
annuity contracts, an insurer is subject to the fiduciary requirements of ERISA.
The pertinent SBJPA provisions provide that insurers are protected from
liability for breaches of fiduciary duties under ERISA for past actions with
respect to their general account contracts. However, insurers remain subject to
Federal criminal law and liable for actions brought by the U.S. Secretary of
Labor alleging breaches of fiduciary duties that also constitute a violation of
Federal or state criminal law. The SBJPA also provides that contracts issued
from an insurer's general account on or before December 31, 1998, that are not
guaranteed benefit policies, will not be subject to ERISA's fiduciary
requirements if they meet the requirements of regulations issued by the United
States Department of Labor. The SBJPA further provides that contracts issued
from an insurer's general account after December 31, 1998 that are not
guaranteed benefit policies will be subject to ERISA. In January 2000, the
Department of Labor published a regulation pursuant to the SBJPA which provides,
among other things, that if an employee benefit plan acquired an insurance
policy (other than a guaranteed benefit policy) issued on or before December 31,
1998 that is supported by the assets of the insurer's general account, the
plan's assets for purposes of ERISA will not be deemed to include any of the
assets of the insurer's general account, provided that the requirements of the
regulation are met. Accordingly, if those requirements are met, the insurer is
not subject to the fiduciary obligations of ERISA in connection with such an
insurance policy. These requirements include detailed disclosures to be made to
the employee benefit plan and the requirement that the insurer must permit the
policyholder to terminate the policy on 90 days' notice and receive without
penalty, at the policyholder's option, either (1) the accumulated fund balance
(which may be subject to market value adjustment) or (2) a book value payment of
such amount in annual installments
39
JOHN HANCOCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
with interest. John Hancock Life Insurance Company has implemented procedures to
comply with the requirements set forth therein to secure the exemption provided
by the regulations from the fiduciary obligations of ERISA. However, John
Hancock Life Insurance Company's exposure to disintermediation risk could
increase due to the termination options that it would be required to provide to
policyholders. Any such increase, however, would not be material. Since the
Harris Trust case has been settled the broader underlying issues of
disintermediation risk created by compliance with the regulations remain
unresolved (described under "Item 3. Legal Proceedings" in this Form 10-K). With
respect to employee welfare benefit plans subject to ERISA, Congress
periodically has considered amendments to the law's Federal preemption
provision, which would expose John Hancock Life Insurance Company, and the
insurance industry generally, to state law causes of action, and accompanying
extra-contractual (e.g., punitive) damages in lawsuits involving, for example,
group long-term care insurance claims. To date, all such amendments to ERISA
have been defeated.
Employees
As of December 31, 2003, we employed approximately 7,974 people. We
believe our relations with our employees are satisfactory.
Available Information
We make available at our corporate internet website
(www.jhancock.com/investor), free of charge, copies of our Annual Reports on
Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, and Current Reports on Form 8-K as
soon as reasonably practicable after such documents are filed with, or furnished
to, the United States Securities and Exchange Commission.
Item 2. Properties
On March 14, 2003, the Company sold three of its Home Office complex
properties to Beacon Capital Partners for $910.0 million. As part of the
transaction, the Company also provided Beacon Capital Partners with a long-term
sub-lease of the Company's parking garage. JHFS entered into 5 - 15 year
market-based leases of the space it now occupies in those buildings, the Company
plans on continuing to use them as its corporate headquarters. In addition, we
lease office space throughout the United States as needed for our operations,
including for our sales force. We believe that our current facilities are
adequate for our current and expected needs. Refer to Note 8 - Sale/Leaseback
Transaction and Other Lease Obligations to our audited consolidated financial
statements for additional information.
40
JOHN HANCOCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
Item 3. Legal Proceedings
Sales Practice Class Action Settlement
During 1997, the Company entered into a court-approved settlement relating
to a class action lawsuit involving certain individual life insurance policies
sold from 1979 through 1996. In entering into the settlement, the Company
specifically denied any wrongdoing. The total reserve held in connection with
the settlement to provide for relief to class members and for legal and
administrative costs associated with the settlement amounted to $3.2 million and
$11.9 million at December 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively. The Company incurred
no costs related to the settlement in 2003 or 2002. Costs incurred related to
the settlement were $30.0 million in 2001. The estimated reserve is based on a
number of factors, including the estimated cost per claim and the estimated
costs to administer the claims.
Administration of the alternative dispute resolution (ADR) component of
the settlement is substantially complete. Although some uncertainty remains as
to the cost of the remaining claims in the final phase (i.e., arbitration) of
the ADR process, it is expected that the final cost of the settlement will not
differ materially from the amounts presently provided for by the Company.
Harris Trust Litigation
Harris Trust
Beginning in 1983, the Company became involved in complex litigation known
as Harris Trust and Savings Bank, as Trustee of Sperry Master Retirement Trust
No. 2 v. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance Company (S.D.N.Y. Civ. 83-5491).
After successive appeals to the Second Circuit and to the U.S. Supreme Court,
the case was remanded to the District Court and tried by a Federal District
Court judge in 1997. The judge issued an opinion in November 2000.
In that opinion the Court found against the Company and awarded the Trust
approximately $13.8 million in relation to this claim together with unspecified
additional pre-judgment interest on this amount from October 1988. The Court
also found against the Company on issues of liability valuation and ERISA law.
Damages in the amount of approximately $5.7 million, together with unspecified
pre-judgment interest from December 1996, were awarded on these issues. As part
of the relief, the judge ordered the removal of Hancock as a fiduciary to the
plan. On April 11, 2001, the Court entered a judgment against the Company for
approximately $84.9 million, which includes damages to the plaintiff,
pre-judgment interest, attorney's fees and other costs.
On May 14, 2001 the Company filed an appeal in this case. On August 20,
2002, the Second Circuit Court of Appeals issued a ruling, affirming in part,
reversing in part, and vacating in part the District Court's judgment in this
case. The Second Circuit Court of Appeals' opinion overturned substantial
portions of the District Court's opinion, representing the vast majority of the
lower court's award of damages and fees, and sent the matter back to the
District Court for further proceedings.
The action has been dismissed and the settlement consummated as of
December 11, 2003. The settlement costs were paid in 2003.
Other Legal and Regulatory Proceedings
We are regularly involved in other litigation, both as a defendant and as
a plaintiff. The litigation naming us as a defendant ordinarily involves our
activities as a provider of insurance protection products, as well as an
investment adviser, employer and taxpayer. In addition, state regulatory bodies,
the United States Securities and Exchange Commission, the National Association
of Securities Dealers, Inc. and other regulatory bodies regularly make inquiries
and, from time to time conduct examinations concerning our compliance with,
among other things, insurance laws, securities laws, and laws governing the
activities of broker/dealers. We do not believe at this time that the ultimate
resolution of any of these legal or regulatory matters that are currently
pending, either individually or in the aggregate, will have a material adverse
effect on our financial condition or results of operations.
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
At a special meeting of the stockholders of the Company held on February
24, 2004, the Company's stockholders voted to approve the adoption of the
Agreement and Plan of Merger dated as of September 28, 2003, among Manulife
Financial Corporation, John Hancock Financial Services, Inc. and Jupiter Merger
Corporation, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Manulife
41
JOHN HANCOCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
Financial Corporation, as amended by the First Amendment to Agreement and Plan
of Merger, dated as of December 29, 2003 (the "Merger Agreement").
204,411,843 shares (representing 70.5 percent of the outstanding shares of
the Company's common stock as of January 2, 2004 - the record date) voted 95%,
or 195,098,527 of the shares voting, were in favor of adopting the Merger
Agreement. 5,135,780 shares voted against the adoption of the Merger Agreement;
and 4,177,536 shares abstained.
PART II
Item 5. Market for John Hancock Financial Services, Inc. Common Stock and
Related Shareholder Matters
JHFS' common stock began trading on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE)
under the symbol "JHF" on January 27, 2000. Prior to such date, there was no
established public trading market for the common stock. As of February 27, 2004,
there were approximately 650,000 shareholders of record and 293.3 million shares
outstanding.
The following table presents the high and low prices for the common stock
of John Hancock on the NYSE for the periods indicated and the dividends declared
per share during such periods.
High Low Dividends
---- --- ---------
2003
First Quarter........... $30.62 $25.40 --
Second Quarter.......... 33.25 26.40 --
Third Quarter........... 35.03 29.80 --
Fourth Quarter.......... 37.69 33.25 $0.35
2002
First Quarter........... $42.30 $35.20 --
Second Quarter.......... 40.67 32.85 --
Third Quarter........... 35.25 26.55 --
Fourth Quarter.......... 32.30 25.84 $0.32
2001
First Quarter........... $40.00 $31.50 --
Second Quarter.......... 41.40 33.86 --
Third Quarter........... 41.70 33.15 --
Fourth Quarter.......... 41.93 33.34 $0.31
JHFS paid annual cash dividends of $0.35, $0.32 and $0.31 per common share
on December 11, 2003, December 11, 2002, and December 13, 2001 to shareholders
of record on the close of business on November 18, 2003, November 18, 2002 and
November 16, 2001, respectively. Future dividend decisions will be based on, and
affected by, a number of factors, including the operating results and financial
requirements of the Company and the impact of regulatory restrictions. See
Regulation and Management's Discussion and Analysis--Liquidity and Capital
Resources, included elsewhere in this Form 10-K.
Item 6. Selected Financial Data
The following table sets forth certain selected historical consolidated
financial data. The selected income statement data for each of the years in the
three year period ended December 31, 2003 and balance sheet data as of December
31, 2003 and 2002 have been derived from our consolidated financial statements
and related notes included elsewhere in this Form 10-K and should be read in
conjunction with those financial statements and Management's Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, also included
elsewhere in this Form 10-K. The following selected income statement data for
the years ended December 31, 2000 and 1999 and balance sheet data as of December
31, 2001, 2000, and 1999 have been derived from our consolidated financial
statements not included herein. The following selected consolidated financial
data has been prepared in accordance with U.S.GAAP, except the statutory data
presented below which was prepared in accordance with applicable statutory
accounting practices and was taken from our annual statements filed with
insurance regulatory authorities. Certain reclassifications to prior periods
have been made to conform to the current period presentations.
42
JOHN HANCOCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
For the Years Ended December 31,
--------------------------------
2003 2002 2001 2000 1999
---- ---- ---- ---- ----
(in millions)
Income Statement Data:(1)
Revenues
Premiums ..................................................... $ 4,147.7 $3,377.1 $3,851.3 $3,452.1 $2,717.5
Universal life and investment-type product fees .............. 838.9 815.2 772.5 749.3 703.5
Net investment income ........................................ 4,227.0 3,934.1 3,944.9 3,864.8 3,524.1
Net realized investment gains (losses), net of related
amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs,
amounts credited to participating pension
contractholders and amounts credited to policyholder
dividend obligation(2) ................................... 33.6 (454.7) (249.1) 88.7 175.1
Investment management revenues, commissions and other fees ... 532.4 550.7 624.4 785.9 700.4
Other revenue ................................................ 291.7 255.7 186.5 17.6 6.5
---------------------------------------------------------
Total revenues ....................................... 10,071.3 8,478.1 9,130.5 8,958.4 7,827.1
Total benefits and expenses(3)(4) .................... 8,722.4 7,841.9 8,304.4 7,800.1 7,564.9
---------------------------------------------------------
Income before income taxes and cumulative effect of accounting
changes .......................................................... 1,348.9 636.2 826.1 1,158.3 262.2
Income taxes .......................................................... 376.7 136.7 214.6 339.6 99.3
---------------------------------------------------------
Income before cumulative effect of accounting changes ................. 972.2 499.5 611.5 818.7 162.9
Cumulative effect of accounting changes (5) ........................... (166.2) -- 7.2 -- (9.7)
---------------------------------------------------------
Net income ........................................... $ 806.0 $ 499.5 $ 618.7 $ 818.7 $ 153.2
=========================================================
Basic earnings per common share(6)
Income before cumulative effect of accounting changes ........ $ 3.38 $ 1.71 $ 2.01 $ 2.60 $ 0.52
Cumulative effect of accounting changes(5) ................... (0.58) -- 0.02 -- (0.03)
---------------------------------------------------------
Net income ........................................... $ 2.80 $ 1.71 $ 2.03 $ 2.60 $ 0.49
=========================================================
Diluted earnings per common share(6)
Income before cumulative effect of accounting changes ........ $ 3.37 $ 1.70 $ 1.99 $ 2.59 $ 0.52
Cumulative effect of accounting changes (5) .................. (0.58) -- 0.02 -- (0.03)
---------------------------------------------------------
Net income ........................................... $ 2.79 $ 1.70 $ 2.01 $ 2.59 $ 0.49
=========================================================
Cash dividends paid per share ......................................... $ 0.35 $ 0.32 $ 0.31 $ 0.30 --
=========================================================
43
JOHN HANCOCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
As of or for the Years Ended December 31,
-----------------------------------------
2003 2002 2001 2000 1999
---- ---- ---- ---- ----
Balance Sheet Data: (in millions)
General account assets ........ $ 87,178.6 $ 77,036.8 $ 68,425.7 $ 60,940.1 $ 56,408.1
Separate account assets ....... 24,121.9 20,827.3 22,718.5 26,454.8 28,047.6
Total assets .................. 111,300.5 97,864.1 91,144.2 87,394.9 84,455.7
General account liabilities ... 77,392.5 69,212.7 61,036.3 54,557.1 50,986.6
Long-term debt ................ 1,410.0 1,450.3 1,402.1 534.0 536.9
Separate account liabilities .. 24,121.9 20,827.3 22,718.5 26,454.8 28,047.6
Total liabilities ............. 102,924.4 91,490.3 85,156.9 81,545.9 79,571.1
Minority interests ............ 160.4 162.7 122.3 93.5 93.5
Shareholders' equity(5)(7) .... 8,215.7 6,211.1 5,865.0 5,755.5 4,791.1
Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform to the
current year presentation. We evaluate segment performance and base management's
incentives on segment after-tax operating income. For a discussion of segment
after-tax operating income see Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations included elsewhere in this Form 10-K.
1) In December 2000, the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants
(AICPA) issued SOP 00-3, "Accounting by Insurance Enterprises for
Demutualizations and Formations of Mutual Insurance Holding Companies and
Certain Long-Duration Participating Contracts." The SOP, which was adopted
with respect to accounting for demutualization expenses by the Company on
December 31, 2000, requires that demutualization related expenses be
classified as a single line item within income from continuing operations
and should not be classified as an extraordinary item. On October 1, 2001,
the Company adopted the remaining provisions of SOP 00-3 which required
the reclassification of $9,710.0 million and $12,035.9 million of closed
block assets and liabilities, respectively at December 31, 2000, and
$1,467.7 million and $1,343.6 million of closed block revenues, and
benefits and expenses, respectively, for the period from February 1, 2000
(date of demutualization) to December 31, 2000, all of which were
reclassified to other existing asset, liability, revenue, and benefit and
expense accounts. The required implementation of SOP 00-3 also resulted in
a reduction of net income of $20.2 million (net of tax of $6.6 million) or
$0.06 diluted earnings per common share for the period from February 1,
2000 to December 31, 2000 and $3.4 million (net of tax of $1.8) or $0.01
diluted earnings per common share for the nine months ended September 30,
2001. Previously reported net income included higher than expected closed
block results primarily due to higher investment earning and better
mortality and lapse experience, which upon the adoption of SOP 00-3, were
excluded from net income and set up in the PDO liability. Finally,
adoption also resulted in the recognition of a policyholder dividend
obligation of $77.0 million at December 31, 2000, which represents
cumulative actual closed block earnings in excess of expected periodic
amounts calculated at the date of the demutualization. See Note 6 to the
consolidated financial statements for a summary description of the closed
block assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses.
2) Net realized investment and other gains (losses) have been reduced by: (1)
amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs to the extent that such
amortization results from net realized gains and losses, (2) the portion
of net realized investments and other gains and losses credited to
participating pension contractholder accounts, and (3) amounts credited to
the policyholder dividend obligation. We believe presenting net realized
investment and other gains and losses in this format provides information
useful in evaluating our operating performance. This presentation may not
be comparable to presentations made by other insurers. For a presentation
of net realized investment and other gains and related amounts see
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Segment Operations included elsewhere in this Form 10-K.
3) Total benefits and expenses includes benefits to policyholders of $6,084.3
million, $5,387.7 million, $5,904.7 million, $5,375.6 million, and
$5,368.5 million for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002, 2001, 2000
and 1999, respectively. Benefits to policyholders excludes amounts related
to net realized investment and other gains credited to participating
pension contractholders and policyholder dividend obligation of $(60.1)
million, $(35.2) million, $25.3 million, $21.0 million, and $35.3 million
for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002, 2001, 2000 and 1999,
respectively.
4) Total benefits and expenses includes amortization of deferred policy
acquisition costs of $315.5 million, $350.2 million, $306.8 million,
$242.0 million, and $166.8 million, for the years ended December 31, 2003,
2002, 2001, 2000, and 1999, respectively. Amortization of deferred policy
acquisition costs excludes amounts related to net realized investment and
other gains (losses) of $9.0 million, $(34.6) million, $(26.4) million,
$(9.3) million, and $50.5 million, for the years ended December 31, 2003,
2002, 2001, 2000, and 1999, respectively.
5) The Company adopted DIG B36 on October 1, 2003, which resulted in a
decrease in shareholders' equity of $66.3 million (net of tax of $35.7
million). The Company recorded a reduction in net income of $166.2 million
(net of tax of $89.5 million), or a reduction of $0.58 per share to the
basic and diluted earnings per common share calculations. This decrease
was partially offset by an increase in other comprehensive income of $99.9
million (net of tax of $53.8 million) which were
44
JOHN HANCOCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
recorded as the cumulative effect of an accounting change, on October 1,
2003. For additional discussion of DIG B-36, refer to Note 1--Summary of
Significant Accounting Policies in the notes to the financial statements.
6) This is unaudited pro forma information which gives effect to the
Reorganization and Initial Public Offering (IPO) of the Company referred
to in Note 1 to our consolidated financial statements. Because the Company
did not have outstanding common stock prior to its IPO on February 1,
2000, the 1999 per share balances represent earnings per common share on a
pro forma basis for the period January 1, 1999 through December 31, 1999
using 314.8 million outstanding common shares for the basic and diluted
calculations. The 2000 earnings per common share balances represent
earnings per common share on a pro forma basis for the period from January
1, 2000 through December 31, 2000 using 314.5 million and 316.2 million
outstanding shares for the basic and diluted earnings per share
calculations, respectively. Actual net income per common share for the
period from February 1, 2000 through December 31, 2000 was $2.46 and $2.45
for the basic and diluted calculations, respectively, after restatement
for implementation of SOP 00-3 (see note 1 above). No cumulative effect of
accounting change occurred in 2000. Pro forma earnings per share for the
periods prior to 1999 are not presented, as it would not be meaningful.
7) Balances prior to 2000 were formerly referred to as policyholders' equity.
45
JOHN HANCOCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results
of Operations
Management's discussion and analysis reviews our consolidated and segment
financial condition as of December 31, 2003 and 2002, the consolidated results
of operations for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001 and, where
appropriate, factors that may affect future financial performance. This
discussion should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial
statements and related notes, included elsewhere in this Form 10-K. All of the
Company's United States Securities and Exchange Commission filings are available
on the internet at www.sec.gov, under the name Hancock John Financial.
Forward-Looking Statements
The statements, analyses, and other information contained in this
Management's Discussion and Analysis (MD&A) and elsewhere in this Form 10-K, in
connection with the proposed merger with John Hancock and Manulife Financial
Corporation, relating to trends in John Hancock Financial Services, Inc.'s, (the
Company's) operations and financial results, the markets for the Company's
products, the future development of the Company's business, and the
contingencies and uncertainties to which the Company may be subject, as well as
other statements including words such as "anticipate," "believe," "plan,"
"estimate," "expect," "intend," "will," "should," "may," and other similar
expressions, are "forward-looking statements" under the Private Securities
Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such statements are made based upon management's
current expectations and beliefs concerning future events and their potential
effects on the Company. Future events and their effects on the Company may not
be those anticipated by management. The Company's actual results may differ
materially from the results anticipated in these forward-looking statements.
These forward-looking statements are subject to risks and uncertainties
including, but not limited to, the risks that (1) a significant downgrade in our
ratings for claims-paying ability and financial strength may lead to policy and
contract withdrawals and materially harm our ability to market our products; (2)
new laws and regulations, including the recently enacted Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, or changes to existing laws or regulations (including, but not limited to,
those relating to the Federal Estate Tax Laws and proposed Bush Administration
tax and savings initiatives), and the applications and interpretations given to
these laws and regulations, may adversely affect the Company's sales of
insurance and investment advisory products; (3) as a holding company, we depend
on dividends from our subsidiaries; Massachusetts insurance law and similar
Canadian laws may restrict the ability of John Hancock Life Insurance Company
(the Life Company) and The Maritime Life Assurance Company (Maritime Life) to
pay dividends within the consolidated group; (4) we face increasing competition
in our retail businesses from mutual fund companies, banks and investment
management firms as well as from other insurance companies; (5) a decline or
increased volatility in the securities markets, and other economic factors, may
adversely affect our business, particularly our variable life insurance, mutual
fund, variable annuity and investment business; (6) due to acts of terrorism or
other hostilities, there could be business disruption, economic contraction,
increased mortality, morbidity and liability risks, generally, or investment
losses that could adversely affect our business; (7) our life insurance sales
are highly dependent on a third party distribution relationship; (8) customers
may not be responsive to new or existing products or distribution channels, (9)
interest rate volatility may adversely affect our profitability; (10) our net
income and revenues will suffer if customers surrender annuities and variable
and universal life insurance policies or redeem shares of our open-end mutual
funds; (11) the independent directors of our variable series trusts and of our
mutual funds could reduce the compensation paid to us or could terminate our
contracts to manage the funds; (12) under our Plan of Reorganization, we were
required to establish the closed block, a special arrangement for the benefit of
a group of our policyholders. We may have to fund deficiencies in our closed
block, and any overfunding of the closed block will benefit only the holders of
policies included in the closed block, not our shareholders; (13) there are a
number of provisions in our Restated Certificate of Incorporation and by-laws,
laws applicable to us, agreements that we have entered into with our senior
management, and our shareholder rights plan, that will prevent or discourage
takeovers and business combinations that our shareholders might otherwise
consider to be in their best interests; (14) we will face losses if the claims
on our insurance products, or reductions in rates of mortality on our annuity
products, are greater than we projected; (15) we face investment and credit
losses relating to our investment portfolio including without limitation, the
risks associated with the evaluation and determination by our investment
professionals of the fair value of investments as well as whether or not any
investments have been impaired on an other than temporary basis; (16) we may
experience volatility in net income due to changes in standards for accounting
for derivatives and other changes; (17) our United States insurance companies
are subject to risk-based capital requirements and possible guaranty fund
assessments; (18) we may be unable to retain personnel who are key to our
business; (19) we may incur losses from assumed reinsurance business in respect
of personal accident insurance and the occupational accident component of
workers compensation insurance; (20) litigation and regulatory proceedings may
result in financial losses, harm our reputation and divert management resources,
(21) we may incur multiple life insurance claims as a result of a catastrophic
event which, because of higher deductibles and lower limits under our
reinsurance arrangements, could
46
JOHN HANCOCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
adversely affect the Company's future net income and financial position, and
(22) in connection with the proposed merger between the Company and Manulife
Financial Corporation: we may not achieve the revenue synergies, cost savings
and other synergies contemplated by the proposed merger; we may experience
litigation related to the merger; John Hancock's (including Maritime Life) and
Manulife's distributors, customers and policyholders may react negatively to the
transaction; we may encounter difficulties in promptly and effectively
integrating the businesses of John Hancock and Manulife; we may not be able to
retain the professional and management talent necessary to operate the business;
the transaction may result in diversion of management time on merger-related
issues; and after the merger, we may experience increased exposure to exchange
rate fluctuations and other unknown risks associated with the merger.
Readers are also directed to other risks and uncertainties discussed, as
well as to further discussion of the risks described above, in other documents
filed by the Company with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission.
The Company specifically disclaims any obligation to update or revise any
forward-looking information, whether as a result of new information, future
developments, or otherwise.
Non-GAAP Financial Measures
A non-GAAP financial measure is a numerical measure of a company's
performance, financial position, or cash flows that excludes (includes) amounts
that are not normally excluded (included) in the most directly comparable
measure calculated and presented in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles (GAAP) in the United States.
In this MD&A and elsewhere in this report we use a non-GAAP financial
measure called "total segment after tax operating income". Please see
"Adjustments to GAAP Reported Net Income" in this report or Note 14--Segment
Information in the notes to the consolidated financial statements, for a
description of total segment after-tax operating income and a reconciliation of
that measure to net income.
We also use a variety of other measures in this report that we do not
consider non-GAAP financial measures because they do not have GAAP counterparts
and are operational measures rather than measures of performance, financial
position, or cash flows in our financial statements. Two examples of these
measures are Sales and Assets Under Management. Sales represents a measure,
defined by the Life Insurance Marketing Research Association (LIMRA), of the
amount of new insurance business we have sold during the period rather than a
measure of revenue. Assets Under Management is an industry measure of a base
upon which fee revenue is earned, which is composed of both assets owned and
assets managed for third parties.
Executive Overview
John Hancock Financial Services (JHFS, or the Company) is a leading
financial services company providing a broad range of products and services in
three major businesses in six segments: (1) the retail business, which offers
insurance protection and asset gathering products and services primarily to
retail consumers; (2) the institutional business, which offers guaranteed and
structured financial products and investment management products and services
primarily to institutional customers; and (3), the Company services retail and
group Canadian customers through its Maritime Life Segment. Our retail business
is comprised of the Protection Segment and Asset Gathering Segment while our
institutional business is comprised of the Guaranteed and Structured Financial
Products Segment and the Investment Management Segment. Our Maritime Life
Segment consists primarily of the financial results of our Canadian operating
subsidiary, Maritime Life which offers protection, asset gathering, pension and
group insurance products. In addition, we have a Corporate and Other Segment.
The Company's primary operating subsidiaries are John Hancock Life Insurance
Company (the Life Company) and the Maritime Life Assurance Company (Maritime
Life).
Our financial reporting and this MD&A is organized in the same manner as
our business. We present a discussion of our consolidated statement of
operations in "Results of Operations" and then proceed to present the business
broken down into its operating segments discussed above, focusing the discussion
therein on the segments' operating income (see Key Performance Indicators for
definition of operating income). In addition to these discussions of segment
operating income we identify and discuss accounting policies critical to
understanding our business operations and understanding of our results of
operations in the Critical Accounting Policies section of this MD&A. We also
identify macro economic issues impacting the industry and the Company in the
Economic Trends section of this MD&A, while we identify significant transactions
affecting the comparability of operating results across reporting periods in the
section labeled Transactions Affecting the Comparability of the Results of
Operations.
Our revenues are derived principally from:
o premiums on individual life insurance, individual and group
long-term care insurance, annuities with life contingencies, single
premium annuity contracts and group life and health insurance at
Maritime Life:
47
JOHN HANCOCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
o fees from variable and universal life insurance products, annuities,
and insurance ASO business in our group business at Maritime Life;
o asset management fees from mutual fund and other investment
management products;
o sales charges and commissions derived from sales of investment and
insurance products and distribution fees; and
o net investment income and net realized investment and other gains
and (losses) on general account assets.
Our expenses consist principally of insurance benefits provided to
policyholders, which includes: changes in policyholder reserves; interest
credited on policyholders' general account balances; dividends to policyholders;
and other operating costs and expenses which include commissions and general
business expenses, net of expenses deferred, amortization of deferred policy
acquisition costs, and premium and income taxes.
Our profitability depends in large part upon: (1) the adequacy of our
product pricing, which is primarily a function of competitive conditions, our
ability to assess and manage trends in mortality and morbidity experience, our
ability to generate investment earnings and our ability to maintain expenses in
accordance with pricing assumptions; (2) the amount of assets under management;
and (3) the maintenance of our target spreads between the rate of earnings on
our investments and credited rates on policy or contract holders' general
account balances.
Key Performance Measures
Certain financial measures recur throughout our MD&A because they are
metrics used by management to run our various businesses. The primary key
performance measure is after-tax operating income; refer to the Results of
Operations by Segment. Secondary key performance measures include return on
equity, where income for the period is divided by average equity excluding
unrealized gains (losses); return on assets, where after-tax operating income
for the period is divided by average assets, which are both measures of the
efficiency with which we invest Company resources; and book value per share,
excluding unrealized gains (losses), which is a measure of growth for the
Company. A key performance measure used by agencies who rate the Company's
liquidity and its ability to repay its debts and execute on customer contracts
is the credit quality rating of our fixed maturity portfolio; refer to the
Investments section of this MD&A for presentation of the credit quality of the
Company's fixed maturity portfolio. Rating agency analysis is especially
important to an insurance company because its ratings drive its ability to price
and subsequently sell certain products. Performance measures based on National
Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC) statutory-based accounting
measures which are viewed as critical to the Company are: statutory premiums and
deposits, a measure of actual inflows from customers indicating growth in any
particular product line, and statutory reserves and capital, measures used by
rating general agencies and regulators of our ability to pay claims of our
customers. Please refer to the tabular presentation of Protection, Asset
Gathering, G&SFP and Maritime Life Segments results for a summary of key product
statutory premiums and deposits. Return on equity and return on assets are shown
below:
For the years ended December 31,
--------------------------------
2003 2002 2001
---- ----
(in millions)
Return on equity........................... 11.17% 8.27% 10.65%
Return on assets........................... 0.77% 0.53% 0.69%
Announced Merger with Manulife Financial Corporation
On September 28, 2003, the Company entered into a definitive merger
agreement with Manulife Financial Corporation (Manulife) which is expected to
close early in the second quarter of 2004. In accordance with the agreement,
each share of JHFS common stock will, at the time of the merger, be converted
into the right to receive 1.1853 shares of Manulife stock. It is estimated that
the shares of Manulife common stock to be issued to JHFS shareholders in the
merger will represent approximately 42.6% of the outstanding Manulife common
stock after the merger. The merger has been approved by the Company's
shareholders but the closing of the merger remains subject to certain
conditions, including the approval by certain U.S. and Canadian regulatory
authorities. Until the merger occurs, the Company will continue to operate
independently of Manulife. Thereafter, the Company will operate as a subsidiary
of Manulife. The John Hancock name will be Manulife's primary U.S. brand. This
Annual Report on Form 10-K does not reflect or assume any changes to JHFS'
48
JOHN HANCOCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
business which may occur as a result of the proposed merger with Manulife. For
additional information, refer to John Hancock and other related public filings
with the U.S. SEC relating to the merger.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
General. We have identified the accounting policies below as critical to
our business operations and understanding of our results of operations. For a
detailed discussion of the application of these and other accounting policies,
see Note 1--Summary of Significant Accounting Policies in the notes to
consolidated financial statements. Note that the application of these accounting
policies in the preparation of this report requires management to use judgments
involving assumptions and estimates concerning future results or other
developments including the likelihood, timing or amount of one or more future
transactions or events. There can be no assurance that actual results will not
differ from those estimates. These judgments are reviewed frequently by senior
management, and an understanding of them may enhance the reader's understanding
of the Company's financial statements. We have discussed the identification,
selection and disclosure of critical accounting estimates and policies with the
Audit Committee of the Board of Directors.
Consolidation Accounting. In December 2003, the Financial Accounting
Standards Board re-issued Interpretation 46, "Consolidation of Variable Interest
Entities, an Interpretation of ARB No. 51," (FIN 46R) which clarifies the
consolidation accounting guidance of Accounting Research Bulletin No. 51,
"Consolidated Financial Statements," (ARB No. 51) to certain entities for which
controlling interests are not measurable by reference to ownership in the equity
of the entity. Such entities are known as variable interest entities (VIEs).
The Company has finalized its FIN 46R analysis for some of the entities
described below. For each of these, the application of FIN 46R required
estimation by the Company of the future periodic cash flows and changes in fair
values for each candidate, starting as of the Company's original commitment to
invest in and/or manage each candidate, and extending out to the end of the full
expected life of each. These cash flows and fair values were then analyzed for
variability, and this expected variability was quantified and compared to total
historical amounts invested in each candidate's equity to help determine if each
candidate is a VIE. The Company also evaluated quantitative and non-quantitative
aspects of control relationships among the owners and decision makers of each
candidate to help determine if they are VIEs.
For each candidate determined to be a VIE, the expected variable losses
and returns were then theoretically allocated out to the various investors and
other participants in each candidate, in order to determine if any party had
exposure to the majority of the expected variable losses or returns, in which
case that party is the primary beneficiary of the VIE. If the Company were
determined to be primary beneficiary of any VIE the Company would use
consolidation accounting for its relationship with it.
The Company used significant levels of judgment while performing these
quantitative and qualitative assessments. The discussion below describes the
status and results of the Company's analysis of those entities which the Company
has identified as reasonably possible candidates for consolidation under FIN
46R.
The Investment Management Segment of the Company manages invested assets
for customers under various fee-based arrangements using a variety of special
purpose entities (SPEs) to hold assets under management for customers under
these arrangements, and since 1996, this has included investment vehicles
commonly known as collateralized debt obligations (CDOs). Various business units
of the Company sometimes invest in the debt or equity securities issued by the
CDOs to support their insurance liabilities. The Company has determined that it
is not the primary beneficiary of any of the CDOs and therefore does not
consolidate them.
The Company generates income tax benefits by investing in apartment
properties (the Properties) that qualify for low income housing and/or historic
tax credits. The Company invests in the Properties directly, and also invests
indirectly via limited partnership real estate investment funds. The limited
partnership real estate investment funds are consolidated into the Company's
financial statements. The Properties are organized as limited partnerships or
limited liability companies each having a managing general partner or a managing
member. The Company is usually the sole limited partner or investor member in
each Property; it is not the general partner or managing member in any Property.
The Properties typically raise additional capital by qualifying for long-term
debt, which at times is guaranteed or otherwise subsidized by Federal or state
agencies. In certain cases, the Company invests in the mortgages of the
Properties, which are non-recourse to the general assets of the Company. In the
event of default by a mortgagee of a Property, the mortgage is subject to
foreclosure. The Company has previously determined that each Property is a VIE,
but that the Company was not the primary beneficiary of any Property, under FIN
46, which was replaced by FIN 46R in December of 2003, as discussed above. The
Company is
49
JOHN HANCOCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
'
currently re-evaluating whether each of the Properties are VIEs, and if so, if
the Company is the primary beneficiary of each, in accordance with FIN 46R.
The Company has a number of relationships with a disparate group of
entities (Other Entities), which result from the Company's direct investment in
their equity and/or debt. This group includes energy investment partnerships,
investment funds organized as limited partnerships, and manufacturing companies
in whose debt the Company invests, and which subsequently underwent corporate
reorganizations. The Company has made no guarantees to any other parties
involved with these entities, and has no further equity or debt commitments to
them. The Company is currently evaluating whether each of these are VIEs, and if
so, if the Company is the primary beneficiary of each.
Additional liabilities recognized as a result of consolidating any of the
Properties or Other Entities (or similarly, the CDOs and Properties) would not
represent additional claims on the general assets of the Company; rather, they
would represent claims against additional assets recognized by the Company as a
result of these consolidations. Conversely, additional assets recognized as a
result of these consolidations would not represent additional assets which the
Company could use to satisfy claims against its general assets, rather they
would be used only to settle additional liabilities recognized as a result of
these consolidations.
The Company's maximum exposure to loss in relation to these entities is
limited to its investments in them, future debt and equity commitments made to
them, and where the Company is the mortgagor to the Properties, the outstanding
balance of the mortgages originated for them, and outstanding mortgage
commitments made to them. Therefore, the Company believes that the application
of FIN 46R will have no impact on the Company's liquidity and capital resources
beyond what is already presented in the consolidated financial statements and
notes thereto.
The Company discloses summary financial data and its maximum exposure to
losses for all these candidates in Note 3 - Relationships with Variable Interest
Entities in the notes to consolidated financial statements.
Amortization of Deferred Policy Acquisition Costs. Costs that vary with,
and are related primarily to, the production of new business have been deferred
to the extent that they are deemed recoverable. Such costs include commissions,
certain costs of policy issue and underwriting, and certain agency expenses.
Similarly, any amounts assessed as initiation fees or front-end loads are
recorded as unearned revenue. The Company tests the recoverability of its
deferred policy acquisition costs, or DAC, quarterly with a model that uses data
such as market performance, lapse rates and expense levels. We amortize DAC on
term life and long-term care insurance ratably with premiums. We amortize DAC on
our annuity products and retail life insurance, other than term life insurance
policies, based on a percentage of the estimated gross profits over the life of
the policies, which are generally twenty years for annuities and thirty years
for life policies. Our estimated gross profits are computed based on assumptions
related to the underlying policies including mortality, lapse, expenses, and
asset growth rates. We amortize DAC and unearned revenue on these policies such
that the percentage of gross profits to the amount of DAC and unearned revenue
amortized is constant over the life of the policies.
Estimated gross profits, including net realized investment and other gains
(losses), are adjusted periodically to take into consideration the actual
experience to date and assumed changes in the remaining gross profits. When
estimated gross profits are adjusted, we also adjust the amortization of DAC to
maintain a constant amortization percentage over the life of the policies. Our
current estimated gross profits include certain judgments by our actuaries
concerning mortality, lapse and asset growth that are based on a combination of
actual Company experience and historical market experience of equity and fixed
income returns. Short-term variances of actual results from the judgments made
by management can impact quarter to quarter earnings. Our history has shown us
that the actual results over time for mortality, lapse and the combination of
investment returns and crediting rates (referred in the industry as interest
spread) for the life insurance and annuity products have reasonably followed the
long-term historical trends. In recent years, actual results for market
experience, or asset growth, have fluctuated considerably from historical trends
and the long-term assumptions made in calculating expected gross profits. As a
result, we changed some of these long-term assumptions in the third quarter of
2002 (the Q3 2002 Unlocking), as further described below.
Q3 2002 Unlocking: As of September 30, 2002, the Company changed several
future assumptions with respect to the expected gross profits in its variable
life insurance business in the Protection Segment and its variable annuity
business in the Asset Gathering Segment. First, we lowered the long-term growth
rate assumption from 9% to 8% gross of fees (which are approximately 1% to 2%).
Second, we lowered the average rates for the next five years from the mid-teens
to 13% gross of fees. Finally, we increased certain fee rates on these policies
(the variable series trust (VST) fee increase). These three changes are referred
to collectively here and elsewhere in this document as the Q3 2002 Unlocking.
The performance of the major market indices for the past five quarters has
demonstrated the propriety of our changes in assumptions. The result of these
changes in assumptions was a net acceleration of amortization of DAC of $36.1
million in the variable annuity business in the Asset Gathering Segment and
$13.1 million (net of $12.3 million of unearned revenue and $2.5 million in
policy
50
JOHN HANCOCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
benefit reserves) in the variable life insurance business in the Protection
Segment. The impact on net income of the Q3 2002 Unlocking to Q3 2002 income was
a reduction of approximately $27.5 million, or $0.09 diluted earnings per share.
The accelerated amortization will reduce the total amortization of DAC in future
periods, but will accelerate the amortization in the short term.
Sensitivity of Deferred Policy Acquisition Costs Amortization. The level
of DAC amortization in 2004 will vary if separate account growth rates vary from
our current assumptions. The table below shows the estimated increased
(decreased) quarterly DAC amortization that will result if actual separate
account growth rates are different than the rates assumed in our DAC models.
Asset
Protection Gathering Total
---------- --------- -----
(in millions)
18%..................................... $ (1.2) $ (1.5) $ (2.7)
13%..................................... -- -- --
8%..................................... 1.3 1.8 3.1
Benefits to Policyholders. Reserves for future policy benefits of certain
insurance products are calculated using management's judgments of mortality,
morbidity, lapse, investment performance and expense levels that are based
primarily on the Company's past experience and are therefore reflective of the
Company's proven underwriting and investing abilities. Once these assumptions
are made for a given policy or group of policies, they will not be changed over
the life of the policy unless the Company recognizes a loss on the entire line
of business. The Company periodically reviews its policies for loss recognition
and based on management's judgment the Company from time to time may recognize a
loss on certain lines of business. Short-term variances of actual results from
the judgments made by management are reflected in current period earnings and
can impact quarter to quarter earnings.
Investment in Debt and Equity Securities. Impairments on our investment
portfolio are recorded as a charge to income in the period when the impairment
is judged by management to occur. See the General Account Investments section of
this document and "Quantitative and Qualitative Information About Market
Risk--Credit Risk" section of this document for a more detailed discussion of
the investment officers' professional judgments involved in determining
impairments and fair values.
Certain of our fixed income securities classified as held-to-maturity and
available-for-sale are not publicly traded, and quoted market prices are not
available from brokers or investment bankers on these securities. The change in
the fair value of the available-for-sale securities is recorded in other
comprehensive income as an unrealized gain or loss. We calculate the fair value
of these securities ourselves through the use of consistently applied pricing
models and discounted cash flows calling for a substantial level of professional
investment management judgment. Our approach is based on currently available
information, including information obtained by reviewing similarly traded
securities in the market, and we believe it to be appropriate and fundamentally
sound. However, different pricing models or assumptions or changes in relevant
current information could produce different valuation results. The Company's
pricing model takes into account a number of factors based on current market
conditions and trading levels of similar securities. These include current
market based factors related to credit quality, country of issue, market sector
and average investment life. The resulting prices are then reviewed by the
pricing analysts and members of the Controller's Department. Our pricing
analysts take appropriate action to reduce valuation of securities where an
event occurs which negatively impacts their value. Certain events that could
impact the valuation of securities include changes in issuer credit ratings,
changes in the business climate, actions of issuer management, litigation and
government actions, among many others.
As part of the valuation process we attempt to identify securities which
may have experienced an other than temporary decline in value, and thus require
the recognition of an impairment. To assist in identifying impairments, at the
end of each quarter our Investment Review Committee reviews all securities where
market value is less than ninety percent of amortized cost for three months or
more to determine whether impairments need to be taken. This committee includes
the head of workouts, the head of each industry team, the corporate Chief Risk
Officer who reports to the Chief Financial Officer, and the head of portfolio
management. The analysis focuses on each company's or project's ability to
service its debts in a timely fashion and the length of time the security has
been trading below cost. The results of this analysis are reviewed by the Life
Company's Committee of Finance, a subcommittee of the Life Company's Board of
Directors, quarterly. To supplement this process, a quarterly review is made of
the entire fixed maturity portfolio to assess credit quality, including a review
of all impairments with the Life Company's Committee of Finance. See
"Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations--General Account Investments"
section of this document for a more detailed discussion of this process and the
judgments used therein.
51
JOHN HANCOCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
Benefit Plans. The Company annually reviews its pension and other
post-employment benefit plan assumptions for the discount rate, the long-term
rate of return on plan assets, and the compensation increase rate. All
assumptions are reviewed and approved by the Chief Financial Officer and
reviewed with the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors.
The assumed discount rate is set in the range of (a) the rate from the
December daily weighted average of long-term corporate bond yields (as published
by Moody's Investor Services for rating categories A, Aa, Aaa, and Baa) less a
5% allowance for expenses and default and (b) the rate from the rounded average
of the prior year's discount rate and the rate in (a) above. In 2003 the Company
set the rate at 6.25%. A 0.25% increase in the discount rate would decrease
pension benefits Projected Benefit Obligation (PBO) and 2004 Net Periodic
Pension Cost (NPPC) by approximately $56.1 million and $3.7 million
respectively. A 0.25% increase in the discount rate would decrease other
post-employment benefits Accumulated Postretirement Benefit Obligation (APBO)
and 2004 Net Periodic Benefit Cost (NPBC) by approximately $14.3 million and
$1.0 million, respectively.
The assumed long-term rate of return on plan assets is generally set at
the long-term rate expected to be earned (based on the Capital Asset Pricing
Model and similar tools) based on the long-term investment policy of the plans
and the various classes of the invested funds. For 2004 Net Periodic Pension
(and Benefit) cost, it is expected that an 8.75% long-term rate of return
assumption will be used. A 0.25% increase in the long-term rate of return would
decrease 2004 NPPC by approximately $5.0 million and 2003 NPBC by approximately
$0.6 million. The expected return on plan assets is based on the fair market
value of the plan assets as of December 31, 2003.
The compensation rate increase assumption is generally set at a rate
consistent with current and expected long-term compensation and salary policy;
including inflation. A change in the compensation rate increase assumption can
be expected to move in the same direction as a change in the discount rate. A
0.25% decrease in the salary scale would decrease pension benefits PBO and NPPC
by approximately $5.6 million and $1.1 million, respectively. Post employment
benefits are independent of compensation.
The Company uses a 5% corridor for the amortization of actuarial
gains/losses. Actuarial gains/losses are amortized over approximately 13 years
for pension costs and over approximately 13 years for benefit costs.
Prior service costs are amortized over approximately 9 years for pension
costs and over approximately 17 years for benefit costs.
Income Taxes. We establish reserves for possible penalty and interest
payments to various taxing authorities with respect to the admissability and
timing of tax deductions. Management makes judgments concerning the eventual
outcome of these items and reviews those judgments on an ongoing basis.
Economic Trends
Economic trends impact profitability and sales of the Company. The impact
of economic trends on the Company's profitability are similar to their impact on
the financial markets. The Company estimates that a full year increase
(decrease) in interest rates of 1.0% would increase (decrease) segment after tax
operating income by approximately $6 million, and that a full year increase
(decrease) in equity markets of 5% would increase (decrease) segment after tax
operating income by approximately $10 million.
The sales and other financial results of our retail business over the last
several years have been affected by general economic and industry trends.
Variable products, including variable life insurance and variable annuities,
until 2001 had accounted for the majority of recent increases in total premiums
and deposits for the insurance industry as a result of the strong equity market
growth in recent years and the "baby boom" generation reaching its high-earnings
years and seeking tax-advantaged investments to prepare for retirement. This
trend has changed due to fluctuations in stock market performance and we have
seen investors return to fixed income products. Our diverse distribution network
and product offerings will assist in the maintenance of assets and provide for
sales growth. Although sales of traditional life insurance products have
experienced continued declines, sales of fixed annuity products and corporate
owned life insurance have increased. Universal life sales have also increased
for the Company and for the industry as a whole, due in part to the market's
demand for products of a fixed nature. With respect to our long-term care
insurance products, premiums have increased due to the aging of the population
and the expected inability of government entitlement programs to meet retirement
needs.
Premiums and deposits of our individual annuity products increased 20.2%
to $2,724.5 million in 2003 compared to 2002, driven by a 45.7% decrease in the
variable annuity business, and a 13.1% decrease in the fixed annuity business.
Our variable life insurance product deposits in 2003 decreased 15.3% to $789.0
million compared to 2002, while premiums and deposits on our long-term care
insurance increased 22.8%, to $967.2 million in 2003 due to persistency and
strong growth in
52
JOHN HANCOCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
business. The rebound in the equity markets in 2003 was the
primary driver of the increase in mutual fund assets under management of
$3,479.6 million, or 13.5% to $29,289.9 million at December 31, 2003. The
increase was due to $4,009.4 million of market appreciation in 2003. Our mutual
fund operations are impacted by general market trends, and any upturn or
downturn in the market may affect our future operating results. Changes in laws
or regulations related to the mutual fund industry may negatively impact our
future operating results.
In our institutional business, sales of fund-type products decreased
$997.9 million, or 25.9%, to $2,854.6 million in 2003. The decrease was driven
by decreasing demand for GICs and increased market competition. Partially
offsetting this decrease was an increase in sales of annuities, SignatureNotes,
and Brokered CDs. Sales of single premium annuities increased 61.4%, or $179.5
million to $472.0 million despite the continued competitive markets. Premiums
from the annuity contracts increased 61.7%, or $171.5 million, to $449.4 million
in 2003. Sales of SignatureNotes, which were launched in August 2002, continued
to be strong as they grew 324.1%, or $983.2 million, to $1,286.6 million.
SignatureNotes is designed to generate sales from the conservative retail
investor looking for stable returns. The introduction of our new product,
brokered certificates of deposits, in September 2003 generated sales of $245.2
million. Brokered CDs products are also offered to retail investors and are
attractive given the availability of FDIC insurance. The investment management
services we provide to domestic and international institutions include services
and products such as investment advisory client portfolios, individually managed
and pooled separate accounts, registered investment company funds, bond and
mortgage securitizations, collateralized bond obligation funds and mutual fund
management capabilities. Assets under management in our Investment Management
Segment increased to $27,763.4 million as of December 31, 2003 from $27,491.4
million as of December 31, 2002. This $0.3 billion increase in assets under
management was driven by $3.8 billion of deposits, $3.0 billion in market
appreciation and $0.2 billion in reinvested dividends partially offset by $6.7
billion of outflows.
The Canadian life insurance industry faces many of the same macro-economic
trends as the U.S. and is also operating within a mature, highly competitive
market. Product innovation, operational efficiencies, consolidations and global
expansion are the key business strategies used by Canadian insurers for business
growth. In responding to this mature market environment, one of Maritime Life's
key business strategies has been opportunistic acquisitions. This strategy
included the acquisition of the individual life and segregated fund business of
Confederation Life in 1995, Aetna Life Insurance of Canada in 1999, Royal & Sun
Alliance Financial (Canadian operations) in 2001 and most recently, the Canadian
individual health and group life and health businesses of Liberty Mutual Group.
These acquisitions have contributed to market share growth, higher profitability
through efficiencies of scale, and enhanced access to capital.
Sales in the retail protection business of Maritime Life, measured as new
annualized premium, increased 18.8% to $54.3 million in 2003 from the prior
year, primarily attributable to the contribution from the acquired Liberty
Health business. Individual life product sales decreased 1.9% to $35.0 million
from the prior year primarily due to universal life products, which experienced
a decrease in sales despite several new product enhancement initiatives, due to
the highly competitive environment. Within the living benefit product line,
individual disability (excluding acquired individual health) sales increased
12.0%, or $11.2 million, from the prior year, reflecting growing consumer
interest in these products. The acquired individual health business of Liberty
Health and reorganization of existing business into a specialty markets
department produced $7.2 million in new annualized premium in 2003.
At Maritime Life, total deposits of guaranteed products, segregated fund
products and group pensions increased 10.6%, or $58.8 million, from the prior
year. Segregated fund deposits fell by 10.0% as customers shied away from
volatile equity markets in the early part of the year in favor of "safe haven"
deposits with either Canadian chartered banks or with insurers' guaranteed
products. This result was offset however by 49.4% growth in year over year new
deposits on Maritime Life's guaranteed products from the prior year, primarily
due to customers' transfers from segregated fund investments. Group pension
deposits grew by 60.9% from the prior year due to increased marketing focus on
this product line.
New sales in Maritime Life's group life and health segment increased $3.2
million from the prior year. The incremental contribution from the acquisition
of the Liberty group life and health Canadian business helped to offset a
slowing of sales in the fourth quarter following the merger announcement. This
product line is highly competitive with only three large providers and is
susceptible to broad economic factors, such as the level of merger and
acquisition activity within the Canadian employer environment.
53
JOHN HANCOCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
Transactions Affecting Comparability of Results of Operations
The acquisitions described under the table below were recorded under the
purchase method of accounting and, accordingly, the operating results have been
included in the Company's consolidated results of operations from each date of
acquisition. Each purchase price was allocated to the assets acquired and the
liabilities assumed based on estimated fair values, with the excess, if any, of
the applicable purchase price over the estimated fair values of the acquired
assets and liabilities recorded as goodwill. These acquisitions were made by the
Company in execution of its plan to acquire businesses and products that have
strategic value, meet its earnings requirements and advance the growth of its
current businesses.
The disposal described under the table below was conducted in order to
execute the Company's strategy to focus resources on businesses in which it can
have a leadership position. The table below presents actual and proforma data
for comparative purposes for the periods indicated to demonstrate the proforma
effect of the acquisitions and disposal as if they occurred on January 1, 2001.
Years Ended December 31,
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
2003 2002 2001
Proforma 2003 Proforma 2002 Proforma 2001
----------- ------------ ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------
(unaudited (unaudited (unaudited
(in millions, except per-share data)
Revenue ...................... $ 10,104.7 $ 10,071.3 $ 8,645.0 $ 8,478.1 $ 9,347.6 $ 9,130.5
Net income ................... $ 807.7 $ 806.0 $ 516.1 $ 499.5 $ 643.5 $ 618.7
Earnings per share, diluted .. $ 2.80 $ 2.79 $ 1.76 $ 1.70 $ 2.09 $ 2.01
Acquisitions:
On July 8, 2003, Maritime Life completed its purchase of the insurance
business of Liberty Health, a Canadian division of U.S.-based Liberty Mutual
Insurance Company, through a reinsurance agreement for approximately $97.5
million. Through the agreement, Maritime Life assumed the entire business of
Liberty Health, including its group life, group disability and group health
divisions, as well as its individual health insurance business. There was no
impact on the Company's results of operations from the acquired insurance
business during 2002 or the first six months of 2003.
On December 31, 2002, the Company acquired the fixed universal life
insurance business of Allmerica Financial Corporation (Allmerica) through a
reinsurance agreement for approximately $104.3 million. There was no impact on
the Company's results of operations from the acquired insurance business during
2002.
On October 1, 2001, Maritime Life completed its purchase of all of the
shares of Royal & Sun Alliance Life Insurance Company of Canada (RSAF) for
approximately $149.9 million. RSAF's business includes life insurance,
guaranteed interest savings and retirement products. The net income relating to
the acquired operations included in the Company's results from the date of
acquisition through December 31, 2001 was $2.4 million.
On April 2, 2001, a subsidiary of the Company, Signature Fruit Company,
LLC (Signature Fruit), purchased certain assets and assumed certain liabilities
out of bankruptcy proceedings of Tri Valley Growers, Inc., a cooperative
association, for approximately $53.0 million. The net losses related to the
acquired operations included in the Company's results from the date of
acquisition through December 31, 2001 were $3.4 million.
Disposal:
On June 19, 2003, the Company agreed to sell its group life insurance
business through a reinsurance agreement with Metropolitan Life Insurance
Company, Inc (MetLife). The Company is ceding all activity after May 1, 2003 to
MetLife. The transaction was recorded as of May 1, 2003, and closed November 4,
2003.
54
JOHN HANCOCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
Results of Operations
The table below presents our consolidated results of operations and
consolidated financial information for the periods indicated.
For the Years Ended December 31,
-----------------------------------
2003 2002 2001
-----------------------------------
(in millions)
Revenues
Premiums ........................................................................... $ 4,147.7 $ 3,377.1 $ 3,851.3
Universal life and investment-type product fees .................................... 838.9 815.2 772.5
Net investment income .............................................................. 4,227.0 3,934.1 3,944.9
Net realized investment and other gains (losses), net of related amortization of
deferred policy acquisition costs, amounts credited to participating pension
contractholders and the policyholder dividend obligation(1) ..................... 33.6 (454.7) (249.1)
Investment management revenues, commissions, and other fees ........................ 532.4 550.7 624.4
Other revenue (expense) ............................................................ 291.7 255.7 186.5
-----------------------------------
Total revenues ............................................................... 10,071.3 8,478.1 9,130.5
-----------------------------------
Benefits and expenses
Benefits to policyholders, excluding amounts related to net realized investment
and other gains (losses) credited to participating pension contractholders and
the policyholder dividend obligation(2) ......................................... 6,084.3 5,387.7 5,904.7
Other operating costs and expenses ................................................. 1,755.7 1,518.6 1,521.6
Amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs, excluding amounts related to
net realized investment and other gains (losses)(3) ............................. 315.5 350.2 306.8
Dividends to policyholders ......................................................... 566.9 585.4 571.3
-----------------------------------
Total benefits and expenses .................................................. 8,722.4 7,841.9 8,304.4
-----------------------------------
Income before income taxes and cumulative effect of accounting changes ............. 1,348.9 636.2 826.1
Income taxes ....................................................................... 376.7 136.7 214.6
-----------------------------------
Income before cumulative effect of accounting changes .............................. 972.2 499.5 611.5
Cumulative effect of accounting changes, net of taxes(4) ........................... (166.2) -- 7.2
-----------------------------------
Net income ................................................................... $ 806.0 $ 499.5 $ 618.7
===================================
(1) Net of related amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs, amounts
credited to participating pension contractholders and the policyholder
dividend obligation of $(51.1) million, $(69.8) million, and $(1.1)
million, for the years ended 2003, 2002, and 2001, respectively.
(2) Excluding amounts related to net realized investment and other gains
(losses) credited to participating pension contractholders and the
policyholder dividend obligation of $(60.1) million, $(35.2) million, and
$25.3 million, for the years ended 2003, 2002, and 2001, respectively.
(3) Excluding amounts related to net realized investment and other gains
(losses) of $9.0 million, $(34.6) million and $(26.4) million, for the
years ended 2003, 2002, and 2001 respectively.
(4) Cumulative effect of accounting changes is shown net of taxes of $89.5
million and $(4.2) million for 2003 and 2001, respectively. There was no
cumulative effect of accounting changes in 2002. The cumulative effect of
accounting change in 2003 relates to the Company's adoption of DIG B36
effective October 1, 2003. For additional discussion of DIG B-36, refer to
Note 1--Summary of Significant Accounting Policies in the notes to the
consolidated financial statements.
55
JOHN HANCOCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
Year Ended December 31, 2003 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2002
Consolidated income before income taxes and cumulative effect of
accounting changes increased 112.0%, or $712.7 million, from the prior year. The
increase was driven by growth in income before taxes of $266.9 million in the
Corporate and Other Segment, $146.9 million in the Guaranteed and Structured
Financial Products, $121.2 million in the Protection Segment, $97.0 million in
the Asset Gathering Segment, $66.6 million in the Maritime Life Segment, and
$14.1 million in the Investment Management Segment.
Net realized investment and other gains increased 107.4%, or $488.3
million, from prior year. See detail of current year net realized investment and
other gains in the table below. The change in net realized investment gains is
the results of gross gains on disposal of; fixed maturity securities of $490.9
million including about $90.8 million of previously written down securities and
prepayment penalties of $62.0 million, real estate of $255.0 million driven by
the sale of the Home Office properties, equity securities of $106.2 million and
mortgage loans on real estate of $76.1 million primarily from prepayment
penalties. These gains are partially offset by impairments on fixed maturity
securities of $521.4 million and associated hedging adjustments during the
period. The improvement of $488.3 million in net realized investment and other
losses in 2003 is net of $1.6 million in net realized investment and other
losses allocated to the participating pension contractholders and $58.5 million
in net realized investment and other losses allocated to the policyholder
dividend obligation.
The impairments in the current period were driven by losses recognized on
other than temporary declines in value of fixed maturity securities of $546.1
million, including impairment losses of $521.4 million and $24.7 million of
previously recognized gains where the bond was part of a hedging relationship.
The largest impairments were; write-downs on $115.3 million on public & private
fixed maturity securities (including an impairment loss of $114.8 million and
$0.5 million in previously recognized gains where the bonds were part of a
hedging relationship) on an international dairy company headquartered in Italy,
$37.7 million (including an impairment loss of $37.3 million and $0.4 million in
previously recognized gains where the bonds were part of a hedging relationship)
on public fixed maturity securities relating to a large, national farmer-owned
dairy co-operative, $36.8 million on private fixed maturity securities
(including an impairment loss of $31.7 million and $5.1 million in previously
recognized gains where the bond was part of a hedging relationship) on a toll
road in Texas, $36.1 million on private and public fixed maturity securities
(including an impairment loss of $34.6 million and $1.5 million in previously
recognized gains where the bond was part of a hedging relationship) secured by
aircraft leased by a large U.S. airline and $29.8 million on private fixed
maturity securities relating to an Australian mining company. Additional losses
were recorded for other than temporary declines in the equity in collateralized
bond obligations of $29.8 million and other equity securities of $28.1 million
during 2003. See General Accounts Investments in this MD&A for a more
comprehensive discussion of impairments.
Gross Gain Gross Loss Hedging Net Realized Investment
For the Year Ended December 31, 2003 Impairment on Disposal on Disposal Adjustments and Other Gain/(Loss)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
(in millions)
Fixed maturity securities............... $ (521.4) $ 490.9 $ (99.6) $ (248.9) $ (379.0)
Equity securities....................... (28.1) 106.2 (7.0) -- 71.1
Mortgage loans on real estate........... -- 76.1 (41.0) (63.7) (28.6)
Real estate............................. -- 255.0 (19.2) -- 235.8
Other invested assets................... (29.8) 26.0 (30.7) -- (34.5)
Derivatives............................. -- -- -- 117.7 117.7
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal................. $ (579.3) $ 954.2 $(197.5) $ (194.9) $ (17.5)
=============================================================================
Amortization adjustment for deferred policy acquisition costs...................... $ (9.0)
Amounts credited to participating pension contractholders.......................... 1.6
Amounts credited to the policyholder dividend obligation........................... 58.5
--------------------------
Total......................................................................... $ 33.6
==========================
In addition to impairment losses, the Company incurred losses on disposal
of fixed maturity securities of $99.6 million, losses on the disposal of
mortgage loans on real estate investments of $41.0 million, losses on the
disposal of other invested assets of $30.7 million, losses on the disposal of
real estate of $19.2 million and losses on disposal of equity securities of $7.0
million
The increase in income before income taxes and the cumulative effect of an
accounting change in the Corporate and Other Segment was driven by growth in net
realized investment and other gains of $335.7 million due to a gain of $233.8
million (and a deferred profit of $247.7 million) on the sale of the Company's
Home Office properties during the first quarter
56
JOHN HANCOCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
of 2003. See Note 8 - Sale/Leaseback Transaction and other Lease Obligations in
the notes to the consolidated financial statements. The increase in the G&SFP
Segment was primarily due to a $98.2 million improvement in net realized
investment and other losses. The increase in the Protection Segment was driven
by a $107.8 million increase in net investment income, a $35.8 million increase
in net realized investment and other losses, and a $35.3 million increase in
universal life product fees. The increase in the Asset Gathering Segment was
driven by growth in net investment income, partially offset by a decrease of
$34.4 million in management advisory fees due to lower assets under management,
partially offset by a decrease in operating expenses. The Maritime Life Segment
experienced a $66.6 million increase in income before income taxes and
cumulative effect of accounting changes primarily driven by an increase of $26.1
million in net investment income, an increase of $13.6 million in realized
investment and other gains, and an increase of $8.9 million in management
advisory fees. In addition, Maritime Life experienced a decrease in amortization
of deferred policy acquisition costs of $31.7 million. The Investment Management
Segment's income before income taxes and cumulative effect of accounting changes
increased due to an increase of $9.0 million in net realized investment and
other gains and a $7.0 million increase in management advisory fees.
Premium revenues increased 22.8%, or $770.6 million, from the prior year.
The increase was primarily due to a $330.5 million increase in premiums in the
Maritime Life Segment, driven by a growth in the group life & health business
following the recapture of significant portions of its group life, accidental
death and dismemberment and long-term disability reinsurance and the acquisition
of the group business from Liberty Life Insurance Company. Also driving growth
in premiums was the G&SFP Segment where premiums improved $170.4 million driven
by the single premium annuity business and the structured settlements business.
We continue to look for opportunistic sales in the single premium annuity market
where our pricing standards are met. Premiums also increased in the Protection
Segment by $137.5 million driven primarily by long-term care insurance premiums,
which increased 22.8%, or $179.4 million, partially offset by a decline in
traditional life insurance premiums of 4.0%, or $42.0 million.
Universal life and investment-type product fees increased 2.9%, or $23.7
million, from the prior year. These product fees consist primarily of cost of
insurance fees on our variable life insurance and universal life insurance
products and mortality and expense fees on our variable annuity products. The
increase was primarily due to an increase of $35.3 million in the Protection
Segment driven by growth in average account values in universal life insurance
products driven by the acquisition of the Allmerica block of fixed universal
life insurance business as of December 31, 2002 and growth in the existing
business. Partially offsetting the growth in the Protection Segment was a
decline of $34.3 million in product fees in the Maritime Life Segment which
declined on lower assets under management due to increased segregated fund
lapses.
Net investment income increased $292.9 million from the prior year. The
increase was primarily the result of asset growth and lower investment expenses.
Overall, the 2003 yield, net of investment expenses, on the general account
portfolio decreased to 5.90% from 6.24% in the prior year. The lower portfolio
yield was driven primarily by the drop in short-term interest rates during the
year, which impacts floating rate investments, and lower yields on investment
acquisitions. In summary, the change in yields was driven by the following
factors:
o As of December 31, 2003, the Company's asset portfolio had
approximately $13 billion of floating-rate exposure (primarily
LIBOR). This compares to approximately $12 billion of exposure as of
December 31, 2002. This exposure was created mostly through interest
rate swaps designed to match our floating-rate liability portfolio.
As of December 31, 2003, approximately 87% of this exposure,
excluding cash and short-term investments, was directly offset by
exposure to floating-rate liabilities. Most of the remaining 13% of
exposure is in floating rate assets acquired for their relative
value and is accounted for in the portfolio's interest rate risk
management plan. As a result of the drop in short term rates over
the year, as well as the increase in exposure, this floating-rate
exposure reduced the portfolio yield by 9 basis points in 2003
compared to the prior year.
o Certain of our tax-preferenced investments (lease residual
management and affordable housing limited partnerships) dilute the
Company's net portfolio yield on a pre-tax basis. In 2003, this
dilutive effect was 8 basis points, compared to 10 basis points in
2002. However, adjusting for taxes, these investments increased the
Company's net income by $7.6 million in 2003 relative to 2002.
o The inflow of new cash for the twelve-month period ending December
31, 2003 was invested at rates that were below the portfolio rate.
In addition, maturing assets have rolled over into new investments
at rates less favorable than those available in 2002. These two
factors account for the majority of the remaining decline in
portfolio rates.
Partially offsetting the effects of these decreases to yields on
investments was an increase in invested assets and a reduction in investment
expenses. In 2003, weighted-average invested assets grew $8,589.9 million, or
13.6%, from the prior year. In addition, investment expenses were reduced $34.9
million in 2003 compared to the prior year. Included are
57
JOHN HANCOCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
reductions in corporate complex expenses and in depreciation expenses associated
with the sale of the Company's Home Office properties of $44.9 million.
Investment management revenues, commissions, and other fees decreased
3.3%, or $18.3 million, from the prior year. The decrease in fee revenue was
driven by the Asset Gathering Segment where fees decline $34.4 million driven by
the mutual funds business where distribution and advisory fees declined due to a
shift in the product mix. The decline in fee rates was primarily due to a
decrease in contingent deferred sales charges on a decline in open-end mutual
fund class B share redemptions. Rule 12b-1 fee revenue also declined due to
lower eligible assets under management. Average mutual fund assets under
management were $27,159.7 million, an increase of $356.4 million, or 1.3% from
the prior year. Partially offsetting the decline in the Asset Gathering
management fees was growth in the Maritime Life Segment of $8.9 million driven
by growth in the administrative services only business and an acquired business,
while the increase in the Investment Management Segment of $7.0 million was
driven by success with the new vertical integration strategy in the Hancock
Natural Resource Group.
Other revenue increased 14.1%, or $36.0 million, from the prior year. The
increase in other revenue is due to Signature Fruit, a subsidiary of the Company
since April 2, 2001, which acquired certain assets and assumed certain
liabilities out of bankruptcy proceedings of Tri Valley Growers, Inc., a
co-operative association on that date. The revenues and expenses of Signature
Fruit are included in the Company's income statement in other revenue and other
operating costs and expenses, respectively, in the Corporate and Other Segment.
Signature Fruit generated revenue of $254.5 million in 2003, an increase of
$18.6 million from the prior year. Also included in other revenue is the fee
revenue generated in the Federal long-term care insurance business, its primary
operating revenue. The Federal long-term care insurance business is a fee
business where the Company administers and supports employee long-term care
insurance benefits offered by the Federal Government to its employees. Federal
long-term care insurance fee revenue increased $7.2 million from the prior year,
its start-up year.
Benefits to policyholders increased 12.9%, or $696.6 million, from the
prior year. The increase in benefits to policyholders was driven by an increase
in the Maritime Life Segment of 28.4%, or $238.4 million. Maritime Life's group
life & health business accounted for $193.1 million of this increase, primarily
due to the reinsurance recapture discussed previously. Retail protection
products increased $37.3 million, driven by increased provisions for future
policy benefits on traditional life products and the impact of reinsurance
recapture on claims, and $16.9 million of acquired individual health business.
Benefits to policyholders in the Protection Segment increased 10.0%, or $208.9
million, from the prior year, due to growth in long-term care insurance benefits
to policyholders of 26.6%, or $189.1 million, primarily due to additions to
reserves for premium growth and higher claim volume on growth of the business
during the period. In addition, in the Protection Segment the non-traditional
life insurance business experienced increased benefits to policyholders of 9.4%,
or $27.4 million, primarily due to an increase in interest credited on higher
current year account balances, partially offset by a $17.9 million decrease in
reserves for lower reserves on term conversions and a decrease in death claims,
net of reserves released. Benefits to policyholders in the Corporate and Other
Segment increased 21.7%, or $104.8 million, driven by growth in the
International Group Program while the decrease in benefits to policyholders from
the sale of the Group Life business effective May 1, 2003 was offset by the
increase in benefits to policyholders from Maritime Life Segment foreign
currency fluctuation. In addition, benefits to policyholders in the G&SFP
Segment increased 5.9%, or $90.4 million, on higher sales of single premium
annuities, partially offset by lower interest credited on account balances.
Interest credited decreased 5.5%, or $59.7 million, from the prior year. The
decrease in interest credited was due to a decline in the average interest
credited rate on account balances for spread-based products, due to the reset of
approximately $11 billion of liabilities with floating rates and new business
added at current market rates. The average crediting rate fell to 4.32% from
4.93% in the prior year.
Other operating costs and expenses increased $237.1 million from the prior
year, driven by an increase of $147.5 million in the Corporate and Other Segment
driven by increases in net periodic pension costs of $32.0 million, deficiency
interest of $22.4 million, $12.3 million in compensation costs, $3.3 million in
pension curtailment losses and administrative service contracts of $4.6 million.
In addition, Signature Fruit operating expenses increased $16.5 million.
Signature Fruit other operating costs and expenses were $257.8 million in 2003
and $241.3 million in the prior year. The Maritime Life Segment other operating
costs and expenses increased $75.6 million driven by the addition of costs in
the acquired businesses and lower reinsurance allowances partially offset by
lower general operating expenses in the group life and health business. The
Protection Segment other operating costs and expenses increased $8.1 million
driven by general insurance expenses and amortization of intangibles related to
the Allmerica acquisition. G&SFP Segment other operating costs and expenses
increased $21.5 million on higher advertising, compensation and commission
costs. Asset Gathering Segment other operating costs and expenses decreased
$19.7 million driven by lower commission expenses in the mutual fund business.
Amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs decreased 9.9%, or $34.7
million, from the prior year. The decrease in amortization of deferred policy
acquisition costs was primarily due to the $64.0 million Q3 2002 Unlocking of
the
58
JOHN HANCOCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
Company's deferred policy acquisition costs (DAC) asset, which increased
amortization of the DAC asset in 2002. The Q3 2002 Unlocking of the DAC asset
occurred based on changes in the future investment return assumptions and our
lowering of the long-term growth rate assumption from 9% to 8%, gross of fees
(which are approximately 1% to 2%). In addition, we lowered the average rates
for the next five years from the mid-teens to 13%, gross of fees. The Q3 2002
Unlocking impacted the Asset Gathering and Protection Segments. See Note
1--Summary of Significant Accounting Policies in the notes to consolidated
financial statements and Critical Accounting Policies in this MD&A for further
discussion. The decrease in amortization of DAC due to Q3 2002 Unlocking of the
DAC asset was partially offset by a $26.0 million increase in amortization in
the Protection Segment for growth in the long-term care insurance business and
adjusting gross profit margins for term conversions in the non-traditional life
insurance business.
Dividends to policyholders decreased 3.2%, or $18.5 million from the prior
year. The decrease in dividends to policyholders was driven by the Protection
Segment, which decreased 8.1%, or $41.5 million. This decrease was due to the
full year impact of lowering of the dividend scale on traditional life insurance
products in the prior year. Partially offsetting the decrease in the dividend
scale was growth in the traditional life insurance products average reserves,
which increased approximately 3.3% from the prior period. Offsetting the decline
in dividends in the Protection Segment was a $29.4 million increase in the
Corporate and Other Segment. The increase in dividends in the Corporate and
Other Segment was due to the sale of the group life business effective May 1,
2003.
Income taxes were $376.7 million in 2003, compared to $136.7 million for
2002. Our effective tax rate was 27.9% in 2003, compared to 21.5% in 2002. The
higher effective tax rate was primarily due to increased pre-tax income driven
by improved net realized investment and other gains/losses, partially offset by
increased affordable housing tax credits.
Year Ended December 31, 2002 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2001
The following discussion reflects the adoption of Statement of Position
(SOP) 00-3, "Accounting by Insurance Enterprises for Demutualizations and
Formation of Mutual Insurance Holding Companies and Certain Long-Duration
Participating Contracts" for all periods subsequent to the adoption of the
closed block on February 1, 2000. In addition, the following discussion includes
gains and losses, both realized and unrealized, on equity securities classified
as trading in benefits to policyholders, a reclassification from net investment
income as part of investment returns related to equity indexed universal life
insurance policies sold at Maritime Life, otherwise these gains and losses are
included in net realized investment and other gains (losses). In addition, the
discussion below reflects the Company's organizational changes within the
Corporate and Other Segment that resulted in reporting the Maritime Life
business as its own operating segment for the first time. The reclassifications
associated with the realignment of the operating segments had no impact on
segment after-tax operating income, or net income of the Maritime Life, or
Corporate and Other Segments, other than to display these businesses separately.
Consolidated income before income taxes and cumulative effect of
accounting changes decreased 23.0%, or $189.9 million, from the prior year. The
decrease in consolidated income before income taxes was driven by $454.7 million
in net realized investment and other losses for the year ended December 31,
2002, compared to $249.1 million in net realized investment and other losses in
the prior year. The $454.7 million in net realized investment and other losses
in 2002 are net of $23.3 million in net realized investment and other losses
allocated to the participating pension contractholders and $11.9 million in net
realized investment and other losses allocated to the policyholder dividend
obligation in 2002. Net realized investment and other losses in the current
period were driven by losses recognized on other than temporary declines in
value of fixed maturity securities of $620.7 million (including impairment
losses of $582.5 million and $38.2 million of previously recognized gains where
the bond was part of a hedging relationship). The largest impairments were
write-downs on United Airlines of approximately $99 million, US Airways of
approximately $42 million, NRG Energy of approximately $46 million, PG&E
National Energy Group of approximately $32 million, Wilton Trust of
approximately $32 million, Petroleum Geo-Services of approximately $28 million,
Power Facilities of approximately $19 million, Corporate Durango of
approximately $17 million, WorldCom of approximately $12 million, Autopistas Del
Sol of approximately $12 million and Aguas Argentina of approximately $10
million. Additional losses were recorded for other than temporary declines in
the equity in collateralized bond obligations of $61.9 million and other equity
securities of $30.8 million during 2002 (See General Account Investments in
this MD&A).
The Company incurred losses on disposal of fixed maturity securities of
$119.2 million, losses on the disposal of real estate investments of $39.0
million, losses on the disposal of equity securities of $28.9 million, losses on
the disposal of other invested assets of $13.0 million and losses on disposal of
mortgage loans on real estate of $1.2 million. Gains were realized on the
disposal of fixed maturity securities of $191.4 million, gains on disposal of
equity securities of $153.9 million, gains on the sale of interest rate floors
of $63.8 million, gains on disposal of mortgage loans on real estate of $55.8
million, gains on disposal of real estate of $13.0 million and gains on disposal
of other invested assets of $10.7 million.
59
JOHN HANCOCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
The decrease in income before income taxes and cumulative effect of
accounting changes was primarily attributable to decreases of $135.1 million in
the Guaranteed and Structured Financial Products (G&SFP) Segment, a decrease of
$116.8 million in the Corporate and Other Segment, and a decrease of $12.0
million in the Investment Management Segment. These decreases in income before
income taxes and cumulative effect of accounting changes were partially offset
by an increase of $45.7 million in the Maritime Life Segment, $18.0 million in
the Protection Segment, and a $10.3 million increase in the Asset Gathering
Segment. The decrease in the G&SFP Segment was primarily due to net realized
investment and other losses, which increased $196.6 million, and lower net
investment income, which decreased $120.5 million driven by floating interest
rates. These decreases in income were partially offset by lower reserves. The
decrease in the Corporate and Other Segment was primarily due to a $54.4 million
increase in net realized investment and other losses and a $46.7 million
decrease in net investment income. The decrease in the Investment Management
Segment is driven by a $13.5 million decrease in net investment income and a
$3.1 million decrease in management advisory fees due to lower assets under
management, partially offset by a decrease in operating expenses driven by lower
interest expense. The Protection Segment experienced an increase in income
before income taxes and cumulative effect of accounting changes primarily driven
by an increase of $17.9 million in universal life product fees, primarily due to
growth in non-traditional life insurance products. In addition, the Asset
Gathering Segment's income before income taxes and cumulative effect of
accounting changes increased due to a decrease in operating costs and expenses,
driven by cost savings in the mutual fund business and company wide cost
reduction programs.
Premium revenue decreased 12.3%, or $474.2 million, from the prior year.
The decrease was primarily due to a $603.9 million decrease in premiums in the
G&SFP Segment, driven by a decrease in the single premium annuity business with
a corresponding decrease in benefits to policyholders. Premiums decreased on
lower sales of single premium annuities, which fell 92.7%, or $750.7 million,
from the prior year due to the sale of three large single premium annuity
contracts totaling $794.1 million in 2001 which did not recur in 2002. We
continue to look for opportunistic sales in the single premium annuity market
where our pricing standards are met. The decrease in premiums in the G&SFP
Segment was partially offset by premium growth in the Protection Segment of
$137.9 million driven primarily by long-term care insurance premiums, which
increased 16.1%, or $109.0 million, and traditional life insurance premiums
which increased 2.9%, or $29.0 million.
Universal life and investment-type product fees increased 5.5%, or $42.7
million, from the prior year. These product fees consist primarily of cost of
insurance fees on our variable life insurance and universal life insurance
products and mortality and expense fees on our variable annuity products. The
increase was primarily due to growth in average account values in universal life
insurance products and variable life insurance product fee increases.
Net investment income decreased $10.8 million from the prior year. The
decrease was primarily the result of lower yields, partially offset by asset
growth and lower investment expenses. Overall, the 2002 yield, net of investment
expenses, on the general account portfolio decreased to 6.24% from 7.09% in the
prior year. The lower portfolio yield was driven primarily by the sharp drop in
short-term interest rates during the year, which impacts floating rate
investments, and lowers yields on investment acquisitions. The change in yields
were impacted by the following drivers:
o As of December 31, 2002, the Company's asset portfolio had
approximately $12 billion of floating-rate exposure (primarily
LIBOR). This exposure was created mostly through interest rate swaps
designed to match our floating-rate liability portfolio. As of
December 31, 2002, approximately 90% of this exposure, excluding
cash and short-term investments, was directly offset by exposure to
floating-rate liabilities. Most of the remaining 10% of exposure is
in floating-rate assets acquired for their relative value and is
accounted for in the portfolio's interest rate risk management plan.
As a result of the drop in short term rates over the year, as well
as the increase in exposure, this floating-rate exposure reduced the
portfolio yield by 60 basis points in 2002 compared to the prior
year.
o Certain of our tax-preferenced investments (lease residual
management and affordable housing limited partnerships) dilute the
Company's net portfolio yield on a pre-tax basis. In 2002, this
dilutive effect was 10 basis points, compared to 8 basis points in
2001. However, adjusting for taxes, these investments increased the
Company's after-tax earnings by $7.9 million in 2002 relative to
2001.
o Due to the late timing of the transaction, the previously described
acquisition of the Allmerica fixed universal life insurance business
in December 2002, resulted in an increase of $0.5 billion in
invested assets, which reduced 2002 net investment income yields by
3 basis points. The assets related to the transaction were recorded
on the last day of the year. Consequently, the Company earned no
investment income on these assets in 2002.
60
JOHN HANCOCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
o The inflow of new cash for the year ending December 31, 2002 was
invested at market rates that were below the portfolio rate. In
addition, maturing assets rolling over into new investments at
market rates less favorable than those available in 2001 also
contributed to the decline in yields.
Partially offsetting the effects of these decreases to yields on
investments was an increase in invested assets and a reduction in investment
expenses. In 2002, weighted-average invested assets grew $7,453.2 million, or
13.4%, from the prior year. In addition, investment expenses were reduced $14.4
million in 2002 compared to the prior year. Also included are reductions in
corporate operating expenses and in depreciation expenses associated with the
planned sale of the Company's Home Office real estate.
Net realized investment and other losses increased 82.5%, or $205.6
million, from the prior year. The increase was driven by other than temporary
declines in value of fixed maturity securities of $620.7 million (including
impairment losses of $582.5 million and $38.2 million of previously recognized
gains where the bond was part of a hedging relationship), the largest of which
were on securities issued by United Airlines, US Airways, Enron and affiliates,
NRG Energy Group, among others; additional detail is provided previously and in
General Account Investments in this MD&A. The Company also incurred losses on
the other than temporary declines in value of the equity in collateralized bond
obligations of $61.9 million and other equity securities of $30.8 million. For
additional analysis regarding net realized investment and other losses, see
General Account Investments in this MD&A.
Investment management revenues, commissions, and other fees decreased
11.8%, or $73.7 million, from the prior year. The decrease in fee revenue was
the result of lower average assets under management. Average assets under
management decreased 4.9%, or $2,094.7 million, compared to the prior year.
Underwriting and distribution fees decreased 12.0%, or $27.8 million, primarily
due to the decrease in front-end load mutual fund sales, and accordingly,
commission revenue and distribution fees. Mutual fund advisory fees declined
14.2%, or $25.3 million, in 2002 primarily due to lower average assets under
management.
Other revenue increased 37.1%, or $69.2 million, from the prior year. The
increase in other revenue is due to the Signature Fruit transaction in 2001, and
is offset by Signature Fruit's expenses in other operating costs and expenses.
The increase in revenues is due to the inclusion of the results of Signature
Fruit for the nine months subsequent to the transaction in 2001. Signature Fruit
is included in other revenue for all of 2002. Signature Fruit, a subsidiary of
the Company as of April 2, 2001, acquired certain assets and assumed certain
liabilities out of bankruptcy proceedings of Tri Valley Growers, Inc., a
cooperative association. The revenues and expenses of Signature Fruit are
included in the Company's income statement in other revenue and other operating
costs and expenses, respectively. Signature Fruit generated $235.9 million and
$177.8 million in revenue in the years ended December 31, 2002 and 2001,
respectively.
Benefits to policyholders decreased 8.8%, or $517.0 million, from the
prior year. The decrease in benefits to policyholders was driven by a decrease
in the G&SFP Segment of 34.4%, or $800.9 million. Benefits to policyholders in
G&SFP Segment spread-based products decreased 36.5%, or $773.3 million, from the
prior year, due to lower sales of single premium annuity contracts, combined
with lower interest credited on account balances. Interest credited decreased
12.8%, or $158.7 million, from the prior year. The decrease in interest credited
was due to a decline in the average interest credited rate on account balances
for spread-based products, due to the reset of approximately $10 billion of
liabilities with floating rates and new business added at current market rates.
The average crediting rate fell to 4.93% from 6.35% in the prior year. Partially
offsetting the decrease in benefits to policyholders in the G&SFP Segment was an
increase in the Protection Segment of 11.1%, or $208.8 million, primarily due to
growth in the long-term care insurance business where the Company increased
reserves for premium growth and higher claim volume. In addition, benefits to
policyholders increased in the non-traditional life insurance business due to
growth in the in-force. The non-traditional life insurance business had an
increase in benefits to policyholders of 23.1%, or $55.8 million, primarily due
to a $33.5 million increase in interest credited on higher current year account
balances, and also driven by a $15.3 million increase in death claims, net of
reserves released.
Other operating costs and expenses decreased $3.0 million from the prior
year, despite an increase of $58.2 million in other operating costs and expenses
related to Signature Fruit and an increase of $28.3 million in interest expense
on debt, both of which were included in only part of the prior year's results.
The decrease in expenses was primarily due to cost containment measures. The
Asset Gathering Segment other operating costs and expenses decreased $75.6
million driven by lower salary and commission expense in the mutual fund
business. In addition, other operating costs and expenses decreased $5.9 million
in the Investment Management Segment driven by lower interest expense from lower
average levels of warehoused commercial mortgages held for sale and lower
average interest rates during 2002. Included in other operating costs and
expenses was $241.3 million in operating costs of Signature Fruit in 2002. The
increase in Signature Fruit other operating costs and expenses is due to their
inclusion in the 2002 results for the full year while included only for nine
months in 2001 after its formation.
61
JOHN HANCOCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
Amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs increased 14.1%, or
$43.4 million, from the prior year. The increase in amortization of deferred
policy acquisition costs was primarily due to the $64.0 million Q3 2002
Unlocking of the Company's deferred policy acquisition costs (DAC) asset, which
increased amortization of the DAC asset. Amortization of deferred policy
acquisition costs increased due to the Q3 2002 Unlocking of the DAC asset based
on changes in the future investment return assumptions and lowering the
long-term growth rate assumption from 9% to 8%, gross of fees (which are
approximately 1% to 2%). In addition, we lowered the average rates for the next
five years from the mid-teens to 13%, gross of fees. We also increased certain
fee rates on these policies (the VST fee increase). These changes in assumptions
resulted in the Q3 2002 Unlocking of the DAC asset, which impacted the Asset
Gathering and Protection Segments (See Note 1--Summary of Significant Accounting
Policies in the notes to consolidated financial statements and Critical
Accounting Policies in this MD&A).
Dividends to policyholders increased 2.5%, or $14.1 million from the prior
year. The increase in dividends to policyholders was driven by the Protection
Segment, which increased 2.3%, or $11.6 million. This increase was due to the
lowering of the dividend scale during the year partially offset by growth in
reserves and aging of the in-force business on traditional life insurance
products. Traditional life insurance products average reserves increased
approximately 4.2% from the prior period.
Income taxes were $136.7 million in 2002, compared to $214.6 million for
2001. Our effective tax rate was 21.5% in 2002, compared to 26.0% in 2001. The
lower effective tax rate was primarily due to beneficial impact of additional
option contracts under the lease residual management strategy, a decrease in the
provision for prior year Federal income tax audit issues, and increased
affordable housing tax credits.
62
JOHN HANCOCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
Results of Operations by Segment
We evaluate segment performance and base management's incentives on
segment after-tax operating income, which excludes the effect of net realized
investment and other gains and losses and unusual or non-recurring events and
transactions. In addition, we believe most investors and analysts that follow
our industry also measure results on the same basis. Total segment after-tax
operating income is a non-GAAP measure which is determined by adjusting GAAP net
income for net realized investment and other gains and losses, and certain other
items which we believe are not indicative of overall operating trends. While
these items may be significant components in understanding and assessing our
consolidated financial performance, we believe that the presentation of total
segment after-tax operating income enhances the understanding of our results of
operations by highlighting net income attributable to the normal, recurring
operations of the business. However, total segment after-tax operating income is
not a substitute for net income determined in accordance with GAAP.
A discussion of the adjustments to GAAP reported income, many of which
affect each operating segment, follows. A reconciliation of segment after-tax
operating income, as adjusted, to GAAP reported net income precedes each segment
discussion.
For the Years Ended December 31,
--------------------------------
2003 2002 2001
--------------------------------
(in millions)
Segment Data:(1)
Segment after-tax operating income (loss):
Protection Segment ...................................... $ 351.5 $ 308.5 $ 298.7
Asset Gathering Segment ................................. 194.3 130.7 148.3
--------------------------------
Total Retail Segments ............................. 545.8 439.2 447.0
================================
Guaranteed and Structured Financial Products Segment .... 321.7 285.4 244.2
Investment Management Segment ........................... 29.8 21.2 29.8
--------------------------------
Total Institutional Segments ...................... 351.5 306.6 274.0
================================
Maritime Life Segment ................................... 105.1 69.0 47.9
Corporate and Other Segment ............................. (53.3) 11.4 36.8
--------------------------------
Total segment after-tax operating income .......... 949.1 826.2 805.7
================================
After-tax adjustments:(1)
Net realized investment and other gains (losses), net (1) 23.1 (296.7) (160.7)
Class action lawsuit .................................... -- (19.5) (19.5)
Restructuring charges ................................... -- (10.5) (27.4)
Surplus tax ............................................. -- -- 13.4
--------------------------------
Total after-tax adjustments ....................... 23.1 (326.7) (194.2)
================================
GAAP Reported:
Income before cumulative effect of accounting changes ... 972.2 499.5 611.5
Cumulative effect of accounting changes, net of tax ..... (166.2) -- 7.2
--------------------------------
Net income ........................................ $ 806.0 $ 499.5 $ 618.7
================================
(1) See "Adjustments to GAAP Reported Net Income" included in this
Management's Discussion and Analysis.
63
JOHN HANCOCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
Adjustments to GAAP Reported Net Income
Our GAAP reported net income was significantly affected by net realized
investment and other gains and losses and unusual or non-recurring events and
transactions presented above as after-tax adjustments. A description of these
adjustments follows.
In all periods, net realized investment and other gains (losses), except
for gains and losses from mortgage securitizations have been excluded from
segment after-tax operating income because such data are often excluded by
analysts and investors when evaluating the overall financial performance of
insurers. Net realized investment and other gains and losses from mortgage
securitizations were not excluded from segment after-tax operating income
because we view the related gains and losses as an integral part of the core
business of those operations.
Net realized investment and other gains have been reduced by: (1)
amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs to the extent that such
amortization results from net realized investment and other gains (losses), (2)
the portion of net realized investment and other gains (losses) credited to
certain participating contractholder accounts and (3) the portion of net
realized investment and other gains (losses) credited to the policyholder
dividend obligation. We believe presenting net realized investment and other
gains (losses) in this format provides information useful in evaluating our
operating performance. This presentation may not be comparable to presentations
made by other insurers. Summarized below is a reconciliation of (a) net realized
investment and other gains (losses) per the consolidated financial statements
and (b) the adjustment made for net realized investment and other gains (losses)
to calculate segment after-tax operating income for the years presented.
For the Years Ended December 31,
----------------------------------
2003 2002 2001
----------------------------------
(in millions)
Net realized investment and other gains (losses) ................................ $ (17.5) $ (524.5) $ (250.2)
Add amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs related to net realized
investment and other gains (losses) .......................................... (9.0) 34.6 26.4
Add amounts credited to participating pension contractholder accounts ........... 1.6 23.3 (42.3)
Add amounts credited to the closed block policyholder dividend obligation ....... 58.5 11.9 17.0
----------------------------------
Net realized investment and other gains (losses), net of related amortization of
deferred policy acquisition costs, amounts credited to participating pension
contractholders and amounts credited to the closed block policyholder dividend
obligation per consolidated financial statements ............................. 33.6 (454.7) (249.1)
Less net realized investment and other (gains) attributable to mortgage
securitizations .............................................................. (11.5) (0.9) (3.2)
----------------------------------
Net realized investment and other gains (losses), net--pre-tax adjustment to
calculate segment operating income ........................................... 22.1 (455.6) (252.3)
Less income tax effect .......................................................... 1.0 158.9 91.6
----------------------------------
Net realized investment and other gains (losses), net--after-tax adjustment to
calculate segment operating income ........................................... $ 23.1 $ (296.7) $ (160.7)
==================================
In 2002, the Company incurred a $19.5 million after-tax charge related to
the settlement of the Modal Premium class action lawsuit. The settlement
agreement involves policyholders who paid premiums on a monthly, quarterly, or
semi-annual basis rather than annually. The settlement costs are intended to
provide for relief to class members and for legal and administrative costs
associated with the settlement. In entering into the settlement, the Company
specifically denied any wrongdoing.
64
JOHN HANCOCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
During 1997, the Company entered into a court-approved settlement relating
to a class action lawsuit involving certain individual life insurance policies
sold from 1979 through 1996. In entering into the settlement, the Company
specifically denied any wrongdoing. The total reserve held in connection with
the settlement to provide for relief to class members and for legal and
administrative costs associated with the settlement amounted to $3.2 million and
$11.9 million at December 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively. Costs incurred
related to the settlement were $19.5 million, after-tax, in 2001. No such costs
were incurred in 2003, or 2002. The estimated reserve is based on a number of
factors, including the estimated cost per claim and the estimated costs to
administer the claims.
During 2002 and 2001, we incurred restructuring charges as part of a plan
to reduce costs and increase future operating efficiency by consolidating
portions of our operations. The plan consists primarily of reducing staff in the
Home Office.
We had been subject to the surplus tax imposed on mutual life insurance
companies which disallows a portion of mutual life insurance company's
policyholder dividends as a deduction from taxable income. Since then, as a
stock company, we are no longer subject to the surplus tax and have excluded it
from segment after-tax operating income in all periods.
Amortization of Goodwill
The excess of cost over the fair value of the net assets of businesses
acquired was $345.0 million and $254.6 million and at December 31, 2003 and
2002, respectively. Prior to 2002, goodwill was amortized, (with the exception
of Royal & Sun Alliance Financial which was acquired on October 1, 2001),
pursuant to Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 142 "Goodwill
and Other Intangible Assets" (SFAS No. 142), on a systematic basis over periods
not exceeding 40 years, which periods corresponded with the benefits estimated
to be derived from the acquisitions. Accumulated amortization and other changes
was $79.5 million and $79.5 million at December 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively
Amortization expense included in other operating costs and expenses was $16.4
million, in 2001. No amortization of goodwill occurred in 2003 or 2002 pursuant
to current accounting guidance. Annually, the Company evaluates goodwill for
impairment using valuations of reporting units annually, or whenever significant
events or changes indicate an impairment may exist. If the fair value analysis
did not support the goodwill recorded, an impairment would be recognized
resulting in a charge to current operations to reduce the carrying value of the
goodwill to its fair value.
The following table shows the amount of goodwill amortization by applicable
segment:
For the Years Ended December 31,
----------------------------------
2003 2002 2001
----------------------------------
(in millions)
Amortization of Goodwill:
Protection Segment.................................................................. -- -- $ 4.0
Asset Gathering Segment............................................................. -- -- 6.8
----------------------------------
Total Retail Segments......................................................... -- -- 10.8
Guaranteed and Structured Financial Products Segment................................ -- -- --
Investment Management Segment....................................................... -- -- 0.5
----------------------------------
Total Institutional Segments.............................................. -- -- 0.5
Maritime Life Segment............................................................... -- -- 5.0
Corporate and Other Segment......................................................... -- -- 0.1
----------------------------------
Total goodwill amortization expense........................................... -- -- $ 16.4
==================================
Goodwill was not amortized for acquisitions completed subsequent to June
30, 2001, pursuant to the adoption of SFAS No. 141, "Business Combinations." See
Note 1--Summary of Significant Accounting Policies and Note 17--Goodwill and
Other Intangible Assets to the consolidated financial statements.
Segment Allocations
We allocate surplus to the segments in amounts sufficient to support the
associated liabilities of each segment and to maintain capital levels consistent
with the overall business segment and corporate strategies. Allocations of net
investment income are based on the assets owned by each segment. Other costs and
operating expenses are allocated to each segment based on a review of the nature
of such costs, cost allocation utilizing time studies, and other allocation
methodologies.
65
JOHN HANCOCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
Protection Segment. The following table presents certain summary financial data
relating to the Protection Segment for the periods indicated.
For the Years Ended December 31,
------------------------------------
2003 2002 2001
------------------------------------
(in millions)
Operating Results:
Revenues
Premiums ................................................................... $ 1,963.5 $ 1,826.0 $ 1,688.1
Universal life and investment-type product fees ............................ 477.1 441.8 423.9
Net investment income ...................................................... 1,434.4 1,326.6 1,264.7
Other revenue .............................................................. 7.7 1.3 8.4
------------------------------------
Total revenues ................................................... 3,882.7 3,595.7 3,385.1
Benefits and expenses
Benefits to policyholders .................................................. 2,299.9 2,076.8 1,882.2
Other operating costs and expenses ......................................... 375.1 343.6 357.6
Amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs, excluding amounts related
to net realized investment and other gains (losses) ..................... 211.7 185.7 182.2
Dividends to policyholders ................................................. 470.0 511.5 499.9
------------------------------------
Total benefits and expenses ...................................... 3,356.7 3,117.6 2,921.9
------------------------------------
Segment pre-tax operating income(1) .............................................. 526.0 478.1 463.2
Income taxes ..................................................................... 174.5 169.6 164.5
------------------------------------
Segment after-tax operating income(1) ............................................ 351.5 308.5 298.7
After-tax adjustments:(1)
Net realized investment and other (losses) gains, net ...................... (18.5) (41.5) (62.2)
Class action lawsuit ....................................................... -- (18.7) --
Restructuring charges ...................................................... -- (5.7) (4.4)
Surplus tax ................................................................ -- -- 9.6
------------------------------------
Total after-tax adjustments ...................................... (18.5) (65.9) (57.0)
------------------------------------
GAAP Reported:
Income before cumulative effect of accounting changes ............................ 333.0 242.6 241.7
Cumulative effect of accounting changes, net of tax ........................ (6.2) -- 11.7
------------------------------------
Net income ....................................................................... $ 326.8 $ 242.6 $ 253.4
====================================
Amortization of goodwill, net of tax ....................................... -- -- 2.7
------------------------------------
Net income before amortization of goodwill ....................................... $ 326.8 $ 242.6 $ 256.1
====================================
Other Data:
Segment after-tax operating income (loss)
Non-traditional life (variable life and universal life) .................... $ 152.9 $ 120.5 $ 121.0
Traditional life ........................................................... 104.7 110.7 107.8
Long-term care ............................................................. 83.9 80.7 73.0
Federal long-term care(2) .................................................. 6.0 0.9 --
Other ...................................................................... 4.0 (4.3) (3.1)
Statutory premiums(3)
Variable life .............................................................. 788.9 926.8 948.5
Universal life ............................................................. 530.5 1,130.9 456.1
Traditional life ........................................................... 968.8 1,035.9 997.3
Long-term care ............................................................. 1,074.3 786.4 661.5
- -----------
(1) See "Adjustments to GAAP Reported Net Income" included in this
Management's Discussion and Analysis.
(2) In 2002, during its start-up phase, the Federal long-term care insurance
business was reported in the Corporate and Other Segment. Effective
January 1, 2003, the business and its prior year results were reclassified
from the Corporate and Other Segment to the Protection Segment.
(3) Statutory data has been derived from the annual statements of John Hancock
Life Insurance Company (formerly John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance
Company), John Hancock Variable Life Insurance Company, Investors Partner
Life Insurance Company (formerly John Hancock Life Insurance Company of
America), and John Hancock Reassurance Company Ltd. as filed with
insurance regulatory authorities and prepared in accordance with statutory
accounting practices. Universal life statutory premiums include a $639.7
million deposit related to the acquisition of Allmerica's
66
JOHN HANCOCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
fixed universal life insurance business in 2002. Long-term care premiums
include $15.1 million in Federal long-term care premiums previously
reported in the Company's Corporate and Other Segment in 2002.
Year Ended December 31, 2003 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2002
Segment after-tax operating income increased 13.9%, or $43.0 million, from
the prior year. Non-traditional life insurance business after-tax operating
income increased 26.9%, or $32.4 million, primarily due to increased universal
life and product-type fee income and increased net investment income partially
offset by increased benefits to policyholders. Long-term care insurance business
after-tax operating income increased 4.0%, or $3.2 million, resulting from
increased premiums, and higher net investment income, partially offset by higher
benefits and expenses and higher amortization of deferred policy acquisition
costs. Traditional life insurance business after-tax operating income decreased
5.4%, or $6.0 million, primarily due to run-off of the closed block. Federal
long-term care insurance business after-tax operating income increased $5.1
million from the prior year, which was its start up year.
Revenues increased 8.0%, or $287.0 million. Premiums increased 7.5%, or
$137.5 million, primarily due to long-term care insurance premiums, which
increased 22.8%, or $179.4 million, driven by business growth from higher sales
and continued lower lapses. This increase was partially offset by a 4.0%, or
$42.0 million decrease in premiums in the traditional life insurance business
due to the run-off of the closed block. Universal life and investment-type
product fees increased 8.0%, or $35.3 million, primarily due to a $38.3 million
increase in the cost of insurance fees resulting from growth in the existing
business and from the addition of Allmerica block of business assumed as of
December 31, 2002. Segment net investment income increased 8.1%, or $107.8
million, primarily due to a 14.6% increase in average asset balances, partially
offset by a 42 basis point decrease in yields.
Benefits and expenses increased 7.7%, or $239.1 million. Benefits to
policyholders increased 10.7%, or $223.1 million, primarily due to growth in
both the long-term care insurance business and non-traditional life insurance
business in force. Long-term care insurance benefits to policyholders increased
26.6%, or $189.1 million, primarily due to additions to reserves for premium
growth and higher claim volume on growth of the business during the period. The
long-term care insurance business claims are being incurred at an aggregate rate
lower than assumed in calculating the reserves of the business. Long-term care
insurance business policies have increased to 706.2 thousand from 604.2 thousand
in the prior year. The non-traditional life insurance business had an increase
in benefits to policyholders of 9.4%, or $27.4 million, primarily due to a $53.0
million increase in interest credited on higher current year account balances.
This increase was partially offset by a $17.9 million decrease in reserves due
primarily to lower reserves on term conversions and a $7.7 million decrease in
death claims, net of reserves released. Other operating costs and expenses
increased 9.2%, or $31.5 million, primarily due to increases in general
insurance expenses, primarily compensation-related, and higher amortization of
the intangibles related to the acquisition of the Allmerica business as of
December 31, 2002. Amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs increased
14.0%, or $26.0 million, primarily due to a $23.8 million increase from growth
in the long-term care insurance business, and an $8.8 million increase in the
non-traditional life business. The non-traditional increase of $8.8 million is
$19.2 million higher due to adjusting gross profit margins for term conversions
and $17.5 million higher due to normal amortization and true-ups primarily for
lower lapse and higher separate account performance in the current year, and is
offset by $27.9 million lower DAC amortization because of the prior period's
unlocking of the DAC asset (See Critical Accounting Policies in this MD&A).
These increases were partially offset by a $6.7 million decrease in the
traditional life insurance business amortization of deferred policy acquisition
costs due to lower contributions from the closed block. Dividends to
policyholders decreased 8.1%, or $41.5 million, primarily due to a dividend
scale cut on traditional life insurance products. The Segment's effective tax
rate on operating income was 33.2% compared to 35.5% for the prior year. The
decrease was primarily due to an increase in affordable housing tax credits, a
decrease in the deficiency charge, and a net change in permanent differences.
Year Ended December 31, 2002 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2001
Segment after-tax operating income increased 3.2%, or $9.8 million, from
the prior year. Traditional life insurance business after-tax operating income
increased 2.6%, or $2.9 million, primarily due to increased premiums and lower
amortization of deferred acquisition costs offset by increased benefits to
policyholders and lower net investment income. Long-term care insurance business
after-tax operating income increased 10.5%, or $7.7 million, resulting from
growth in the business and improved unit expenses. Non-traditional life
insurance business after-tax operating income decreased 0.4%, or $0.5 million,
primarily due to higher amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs driven
by the Q3 2002 Unlocking of the deferred policy acquisition costs (DAC) asset
and higher benefits to policyholders, partially offset by increased universal
life and product-type fee income and lower operating costs and expenses.
Increased net investment income more than offset increased interest credited,
resulting in higher universal life spread on the growing block of business.
67
JOHN HANCOCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
Revenues increased 6.2%, or $210.6 million. Premiums increased 8.2%, or
$137.9 million, primarily due to long-term care insurance premiums, which
increased 16.1%, or $109.0 million, driven by continued growth in the business.
In addition, traditional life insurance premiums increased 2.9%, or $29.0
million, primarily due to the return of renewal premiums in the prior year of
$34.4 million as part of the resolution of the class action lawsuit, offset by a
corresponding change in the benefit reserves. Universal life and investment-type
product fees increased 4.2%, or $17.9 million due primarily to increased expense
charges of $11.8 million. Segment net investment income increased 4.9%, or $61.9
million, primarily due to a 10.8% increase in average account balances,
partially offset by a 41 basis point decrease in yields.
Benefits and expenses increased 6.7%, or $195.7 million. Benefits to
policyholders increased 10.3%, or $194.6 million, primarily due to growth in the
long-term care insurance business and non-traditional life insurance business in
force. Long-term care insurance benefits and expenses increased 19.1%, or $137.2
million, primarily due to additions to reserves for premium growth and higher
claim volume driven by business growth. Long-term care insurance business
average policies have increased to 604.2 thousand from 538.7 thousand in the
prior year and open claims increased to 5,449 from 4,483 in the prior year. The
non-traditional life insurance business had an increase in benefits to
policyholders of 21.4%, or $51.7 million, primarily due to a $33.5 million
increase in interest credited on higher current year account balances, and also
driven by a $15.3 million increase in death claims, net of reserves released.
Other operating costs and expenses decreased 3.9%, or $14.0 million primarily
due to a decrease of $8.3 million in operating expenses primarily due to expense
reductions. Amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs increased 1.9%, or
$3.5 million, primarily due to the non-traditional life insurance business
driven by the $27.9 million Q3 2002 Unlocking of DAC asset (See Note 1--Summary
of Significant Accounting Policies in the notes to the unaudited financial
statements and the Critical Accounting Policies in this MD&A). This was offset
by a decrease in amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs in the
traditional life insurance business of $19.7 million, due to improved
persistency of term insurance, and lower margins. Dividends to policyholders
increased 2.3%, or $11.6 million, due to a higher dividend scale and aging of
the in-force business on traditional life insurance products. The Segment's
effective tax rate on operating income was 35.5% for both 2002 and 2001.
68
JOHN HANCOCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
Asset Gathering Segment
The following table presents certain summary financial data relating to
the Asset Gathering Segment for the periods indicated.
For the Years Ended December 31,
2003 2002 2001
-----------------------------------
(in millions)
Operating Results:
Revenues
Premiums ..................................................... $ 35.3 $ 29.2 $ 74.8
Investment-type product fees ................................. 116.8 118.6 125.6
Net investment income ........................................ 710.1 575.7 498.5
Investment management revenues, commissions, and other fees .. 388.8 423.2 477.9
Other revenue (expense) ...................................... 3.4 1.1 (0.3)
-------- -------- ---------
Total revenues ........................................... 1,254.4 1,147.8 1,176.5
Benefits and expenses
Benefits to policyholders .................................... 500.7 446.7 441.6
Other operating costs and expenses ........................... 356.8 366.5 445.9
Amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs, net ....... 111.4 140.5 75.0
Dividends to policyholders ................................... 0.1 0.1 0.1
-------- -------- ---------
Total benefits and expenses .............................. 969.0 953.8 962.6
-------- -------- ---------
Segment pre-tax operating income (1) .............................. 285.4 194.0 213.9
Income taxes ...................................................... 91.1 63.3 65.6
-------- -------- ---------
Segment after-tax operating income (1) ............................ 194.3 130.7 148.3
After-tax adjustments (1):
Net realized investment and other (losses) gains, net ........ (30.2) (25.7) (34.7)
Restructuring charges ........................................ -- (6.1) (17.6)
Surplus tax .................................................. -- -- 0.2
-------- -------- ---------
Total after-tax adjustments .............................. (30.2) (31.8) (52.1)
-------- -------- ---------
GAAP Reported:
Income before cumulative effect of accounting changes ............. 164.1 98.9 96.2
Cumulative effect of accounting changes, net of tax .......... (4.5) -- (0.5)
-------- -------- ---------
Net income ........................................................ $ 159.6 $ 98.9 $ 95.7
======== ======== =========
Amortization of goodwill, net of tax ......................... -- -- 4.5
-------- -------- ---------
Net income before amortization of goodwill ........................ $ 159.6 $ 98.9 $ 100.2
======== ======== =========
69
JOHN HANCOCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
For the Years Ended December 31,
2003 2002 2001
-------------------------------------
(in millions)
Other Data:
Segment after-tax operating income
Annuity ...................................... $ 140.3 $ 73.4 $ 90.3
Mutual funds ................................. 50.3 52.1 55.5
Other ........................................ 3.7 5.1 2.5
Annuity premiums and deposits (2)
Fixed ........................................ 2,319.4 2,668.0 1,463.5
Variable (3) ................................. 405.1 746.1 639.6
Mutual fund assets under management, end of year .. 29,289.9 25,810.3 29,285.8
(1) See "Adjustments to GAAP Reported Net Income" included in this
Management's Discussion and Analysis.
(2) Statutory data have been derived from the annual statements of John
Hancock Life Insurance Company and John Hancock Variable Life Insurance
Company, as filed with insurance regulatory authorities and prepared in
accordance with statutory accounting practices.
(3) Variable annuity deposits exclude internal exchanges as part of the safe
harbor internal exchange program of $92.0 million and $1,910.5 million,
respectively, for the years ending December 31, 2002 and 2001. No such
exchanges took place in 2003.
Year Ended December 31, 2003 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2002
Segment after-tax operating income increased 48.7%, or $63.6 million, from
the prior year. The increase in segment after-tax operating income was driven by
a $34.6 million increase in the variable annuity business. The growth in the
variable annuity business was driven by improved separate account performance in
the current period. Separate accounts experienced a 19.9% return in 2003
compared to a negative return of 14.6% in 2002. The poor separate account
performance in 2002 resulted in a one time unlocking of the deferred policy
acquisition cost asset of $36.1 million in the prior year. Partially offsetting
the decrease in the amortization of the deferred policy acquisition costs was a
$10.5 million increase in operating expenses and a decrease of $6.9 million in
universal life and investment product fees. The increase in segment after-tax
operating income was also driven by a $32.3 million increase in the fixed
annuity business, as net investment income increased 22.9%, or $129.0 million,
on higher assets under management, and was partially offset by an increase in
benefits to policyholders of $57.9 million driven by interest credited on higher
average account values. Mutual fund business after-tax operating income was
$50.3 million, declining 3.5%, or $1.8 million, primarily due to a 7.8%, or
$23.8 million, decrease in management advisory fees, offset by a 28.0%, or $24.6
million, decrease in commissions. After-tax operating income for Essex, a
distribution subsidiary primarily serving the financial institution channel,
decreased $0.3 million. Signature Services after-tax operating income decreased
$0.3 million and Signator Investors after-tax operating income decreased $0.2
million.
Revenues increased 9.3%, or $106.6 million, from the prior year. The
increase in revenue was due to a $134.4 million increase in net investment
income, driven by the annuity business, offset by a $34.4 million decrease in
investment management revenues and other fees. The increase in net investment
income was primarily due to increases in invested assets backing fixed annuity
products, partially offset by lower earned yields in the portfolio. Average
invested assets backing fixed annuity products increased 31.6% to $10,157.5
million while the average investment yield decreased 61 basis points.
Investment-type product fees decreased 1.6%, or $1.9 million, including a $6.9
million decrease in the variable annuity business, mostly due to a decline in
the average fund values of 5.2%, or $300.3 million, to $5,512.5 million from the
prior year. Fixed annuity investment-type product fees increased $5.0 million
generally due to higher average account values. For variable annuities the
mortality and expense fees as a percentage of average account balances was 1.29%
for the current and prior year periods.
Investment management revenues, commissions, and other fees decreased
8.1%, or $34.4 million from the prior year due to a shift in the product mix.
Average mutual fund assets under management were $27,159.7 million, an increase
of $356.4 million, or 1.3% from the prior year. The increase in average mutual
fund assets under management is primarily due to market appreciation of $4,009.4
million since December 31, 2002. The mutual fund business experienced net
redemptions of $246.9 million during 2003, compared to net deposits of $379.1
million in the prior year, a decline of $626.0 million. This change was due to a
decrease in deposits and reinvestments of $236.6 million and an increase in
redemptions and withdrawals of $437.4 million. The decrease in deposits and
reinvestments was driven by a decline in institutional advisory account sales of
$527.2 million, partially offset by increases in retail open-end funds of $95.8
million, closed-end funds of $197.6 million and private managed account sales of
$102.2 million. The increase in redemptions and withdrawals was
70
JOHN HANCOCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
caused by an increase in institutional advisory account redemptions of $916.7
million, partially offset by a decrease in open-end retail mutual fund
redemptions of $490.5 million. Investment advisory fees decreased 1.9%, or $2.8
million, to $149.4 million, from the prior period and were 0.55% and 0.57% of
average mutual fund assets under management for the years ended December 31,
2003 and 2002. Underwriting and distribution fees decreased 11.3%, or $23.3
million, to $181.4 million compared to the prior period, primarily due to a
decrease in contingent deferred sales charges on a decline in open-end mutual
fund class B share redemptions. Rule 12b-1 fee revenue also declined due to
lower eligible assets under management. The decrease also included a $7.9
million decrease in distribution and other fees. Shareholder service and other
fees were $58.0 million compared to $66.3 million in the prior year.
Benefits and expenses increased 1.6%, or $15.2 million from the prior
year. Driving the increase in benefits and expenses was an increase of 12.1%, or
$54.0 million, in benefits to policyholders. Benefits to policyholders increased
$57.9 million in the fixed annuity business primarily due to a $40.3 million
increase in interest credited on fixed annuity account balances due to higher
average account balances and $9.5 million in higher reserve provisions for
life-contingent immediate fixed annuity fund values on higher sales of these
contract types. Offsetting the increase in benefits and expenses was a decline
of $29.1 million in amortization of deferred policy costs primarily due to the
variable annuity business. Amortization of deferred policy costs decreased $54.3
million from the prior year in the variable annuity business due in part to the
prior year DAC unlocking of $36.1 million. In 2002, the variable annuity
business experienced significant declines in the equity markets, leading to an
increase in the amortization of deferred policy costs, resulting in the Q3 2002
Unlocking (See Note 1 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies in the notes
to the consolidated financial statements and Critical Accounting Policies in
this MD&A). Amortization of deferred policy costs also decreased $26.9 million
due in part to higher variable annuity future profit margins associated with
improved separate account performance in the current year, and increased $25.3
million due to higher fixed annuity deferred policy cost asset balances. Other
operating costs and expenses decreased 2.6%, or $9.7 million, from the prior
year, primarily due to the decrease in commission expense in the mutual funds
business. The Segment's effective tax rate on operating income was 31.9%
compared to 32.6% for the prior year. The decrease in the rate is due to an
increase in affordable housing tax credits and lower dividends received
deductions in the current period.
Year Ended December 31, 2002 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2001
Segment after-tax operating income decreased 11.9%, or $17.6 million from
the prior year. The decrease in segment after-tax operating income was driven by
a $31.1 million decrease in the variable annuity business. The variable annuity
business suffered due to significant declines in the equity markets leading to
increased amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs driven by the Q3
Unlocking (See Note 1 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies in the notes
to the consolidated financial statements and Critical Accounting Policies in
this MD&A). Partially offsetting the losses in the variable annuity business was
growth of 20.7%, or $14.3 million, in after-tax operating income in the fixed
annuity business driven by higher net investment income, partially offset by
higher interest credited on account balance growth. Mutual fund segment
after-tax operating income was $52.1 million, declining 6.1% or $3.4 million
primarily due to a 15.2%, or $55.1 million decrease in management advisory fees,
partially offset by an 18.0%, or $50.2 million decrease in operating expenses.
After-tax operating income for Essex, a distribution subsidiary primarily
serving the financial institution channel, decreased $2.3 million from $2.6
million, during the same period in 2001. First Signature Bank after-tax
operating income decreased $0.6 million. Signature Services after-tax operating
income increased $1.7 million, driven by an increase in management advisory fees
from the same period in 2001 and continued expense management. Signator
Investors after-tax operating income increased $3.8 million.
Revenues decreased 2.4%, or $28.7 million, from the prior year. The
decrease in revenue was due to a $54.7 million decline in investment management
revenues driven by the mutual fund business, a $45.5 million decline in premiums
in the fixed annuity business on lower life-contingent fixed annuity sales and a
$6.9 million decrease in investment-type product fees, primarily in the variable
annuity business on lower average fund values. These declines in revenue were
partially offset by an increase of 15.5%, or $77.2 million in net investment
income. The increase in net investment income was primarily due to increases in
invested assets backing fixed annuity products, partially offset by lower earned
yields in the portfolio. Average invested assets backing fixed annuity products
increased 29.1% to $7,719.2 million while the average investment yield decreased
77 basis points. Investment-type product fees decreased 5.5%, or $6.9 million,
mostly due to a decline in the average variable annuity fund values of 13.9%, or
$940.2 million, to $5,812.8 million from the prior year. Both market
depreciation of $778.4 million and net outflows of $242.2 drove this decrease in
average variable annuity fund values for the current year. For variable
annuities the mortality and expense fees as a percentage of average account
balances were 1.29% and 1.22% for the current and prior year periods.
Investment management revenues, commissions, and other fees decreased
11.4%, or $54.7 million from the prior year. Average mutual fund assets under
management were $26,803.3, a decrease of $2,757.9 million, or 9.3% from the
prior year. The decrease in average mutual fund assets under management is
primarily due to market depreciation of $3,548.0 million since December 31,
2001. The mutual fund business experienced net deposits of $379.1 million during
2002, compared to net
71
JOHN HANCOCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
deposits of $554.5 million in the prior year, a decline of $175.4 million. This
change was primarily due to a decrease in deposits of $628.3 million driven by a
decrease in retail open-end funds sales and institutional advisory account
deposits in the current year compared to the prior year. The decrease was
partially offset by $1,391.1 million in sales of the John Hancock Preferred
Income series of closed-end funds, the acquisition of the U.S. Global Leaders
Growth Fund, which had $238.5 million in sales and a $62.7 million increase in
private managed account sales. In addition, the sale of the full service
retirement plan business during 2001 contributed to the decrease in deposits in
the current period. Investment advisory fees decreased 14.3%, or $25.4 million,
to $152.3 million, from the prior period and were 0.57% and 0.60% of average
mutual fund assets under management for the years ended December 31, 2002 and
2001. Underwriting and distribution fees decreased 12.0%, or $27.8 million, to
$204.7 million compared to the prior period, primarily due to a decrease in
front end load mutual fund sales, resulting in a decrease of $23.3 million in
fees and accordingly, commission revenue. The decrease also included a $4.5
million decrease in distribution and other fees. Shareholder service and other
fees were $66.3 million compared to $46.4 million in the prior year.
Benefits and expenses decreased 0.9%, or $8.8 million from the prior year.
Driving the decrease was a decline in other operating costs and expenses of
17.8%, or $79.4 million, from the prior year, primarily due to cost savings in
the mutual fund business as well as company wide cost reduction programs, which
drove the decline in expenses in the other Asset Gathering segment businesses.
Benefits to policyholders increased 1.2%, or $5.1 million, primarily due to a
$50.4 million increase in interest credited on fixed annuity account balances
due to higher average account balances and $5.2 million in higher guaranteed
minimum death benefit claims, partially offset by $49.6 million lower reserve
provisions for life-contingent immediate fixed annuity fund values on lower
sales of these contract types. Amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs
increased 87.3%, or $65.5 million, primarily due to the variable annuity
business driven by the $36.1 million Q3 Unlocking of the DAC asset mentioned
previously. The Segment's effective tax rate on operating income was 32.6%
compared to 30.6% for the prior year. The increase in the rate is due to lower
dividends received deductions in the current period associated with lower
dividends received on stocks in the variable annuity separate account investment
funds.
72
JOHN HANCOCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
Guaranteed and Structured Financial Products Segment. The following table
presents certain summary financial data relating to the Guaranteed and
Structured Financial Products Segment for the periods indicated.
For the Years Ended
December 31,
--------------------------------
2003 2002 2001
---- ---- ----
( in millions)
Operating Results:
Revenues
Premiums ............................................................ $ 466.3 $ 295.9 $ 899.9
Investment-type product fees ........................................ 58.3 56.0 57.3
Net investment income ............................................... 1,695.4 1,715.1 1,835.6
Other revenue ....................................................... 1.4 0.9 0.3
--------------------------------
Total revenues ................................................. 2,221.4 2,067.9 2,793.1
--------------------------------
Benefits and expenses:
Benefits to policyholders, .......................................... 1,618.1 1,527.7 2,328.7
Other operating costs and expenses .................................. 86.5 65.0 60.1
Amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs ................... 2.3 2.2 2.4
Dividends to policyholders .......................................... 40.2 46.5 36.1
--------------------------------
Total benefits and expenses .................................... 1,747.1 1,641.4 2,427.3
--------------------------------
Segment pre-tax operating income(1) ....................................... 474.3 426.5 365.8
Income taxes .............................................................. 152.6 141.1 121.6
--------------------------------
Segment after-tax operating income(1) ..................................... 321.7 285.4 244.2
After-tax adjustments:(1)
Net realized investment and other gains (losses), net ............... (135.9) (202.0) (76.9)
Restructuring charges ............................................... -- (0.6) (1.2)
Surplus tax ......................................................... -- -- 2.6
--------------------------------
Total after-tax adjustments .................................... (135.9) (202.6) (75.5)
--------------------------------
GAAP Reported:
Income before cumulative effect of accounting changes ..................... $ 185.8 82.8 168.7
Cumulative effect of accounting changes, net of tax ................. (155.5) -- (1.2)
--------------------------------
Net income ................................................................ $ 30.3 $ 82.8 $ 167.5
================================
Amortization of goodwill, net of tax ................................ -- -- --
--------------------------------
Net income before amortization of goodwill ................................ $ 30.3 $ 82.8 $ 167.5
================================
Other Data:
Segment after-tax operating income
Spread-based products
GIC's and funding agreements ................................... $ 209.1 $ 190.7 $ 163.7
Single premium annuities ....................................... 84.7 72.6 57.0
SignatureNotes ................................................. 11.5 (0.7) --
Fee-based products .................................................. 16.4 22.8 23.5
Premiums and deposits
Spread-based products
Fund-type products ............................................. 2,524.6 4,067.7 4,718.8
Single premium annuities ....................................... 468.4 292.7 893.6
SignatureNotes ................................................. 1,260.1 290.2 --
Banking Products ............................................... 245.2 -- --
Fee-based products
Participating contracts and conversion annuity contracts .. 852.5 529.3 468.9
Structured Separate Accounts .............................. 54.5 483.9 77.4
Other separate account contracts .......................... (46.2) 53.9 139.3
- -----------
(1) See "Adjustments to GAAP Reported Net Income" included in this
Management's Discussion and Analysis.
73
JOHN HANCOCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
Year Ended December 31, 2003 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2002
Segment after-tax operating income increased 12.7%, or $36.3 million from
the prior year. Spread-based products' 'after-tax operating income increased
16.3%, or $42.7 million from the prior year. The increase in the spread-based
business is primarily due to the increase in investment spread of 13.7%, or
$55.1 million from the prior year. The increase in investment spread was a
result of a higher average invested asset base, which increased 9.2%, or $2.1
billion from the prior year, combined with a 5 basis point increase in the
interest rate margin. The increase in interest rate margin is primarily from
increased partnership income. GICs and funding agreements accounted for 65.0% of
segment after-tax operating income compared to 66.8% in the prior year. On a
total company basis, GICs and funding agreements accounted for 22.0% of
after-tax operating income compared to 23.1% in the prior year. Fee-based
products after-tax operating income decreased 28.1%, or $6.4 million from the
prior year, primarily due to lower separate account risk charges and lower risk
based capital.
Revenues increased 7.4%, or $153.5 million from the prior year, largely
due to an increase in premiums of 57.6%, or $170.4 million, driven by a 60.0%,
or $175.7 million, increase in single premium annuities from the prior year. Net
investment income decreased 1.1%, or $19.7 million from the prior year, despite
growth of 9.2%, or $2.1 billion in the spread-based average invested assets. Net
investment income declined due to a lower average investment yield, which fell
to 5.85% from the prior year, reflecting the lower interest rate environment in
the current period. Net investment income varies with market interest rates
because the return on approximately $11 billion, or 43.9% of the asset
portfolio, floats with market rates. In addition, new sales generate cash flows,
which are invested at the current market interest rates, which have decreased
from the prior year. Matching the interest rate exposure on our asset portfolio
to the exposure on our liabilities is a central feature of our asset/liability
management process. Investment-type product fees increased 4.1%, or $2.3 million
from the prior year due to increased sale of structured settlement contracts
partially offset by lower asset-based fees on separate accounts.
Benefits and expenses increased 6.4%, or $105.7 from the prior year. The
increase was primarily due to higher benefits to policyholders as a result of
higher sales of single premium annuities. Benefits to policyholders for
spread-based products increased 7.5%, or $100.8 million from the prior year, due
to higher sales of single premium annuity contracts, partially offset by lower
interest credited on account balances. Interest credited decreased 5.5%, or
$59.7 million, from the prior year. The decrease in interest credited was due to
a decline in the average interest credited rate on account balances for
spread-based products, due to the reset of approximately $11 billion of
liabilities with floating rates and new business added at current market rates.
The average crediting rate fell to 4.32% from 4.93% in the prior year. Other
operating costs and expenses increased 33.1%, or $21.5 million from the prior
year. This increase was driven by higher advertising costs, compensation costs
and commissions on structured settlement sales, partially offset by lower state
taxes, licenses, and fees. Dividends to policyholders decreased 13.5%, or $6.3
million from the prior year. The segment's effective tax rate on operating
income was 32.2% compared to 33.1% in the prior year.
Year Ended December 31, 2002 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2001
Segment after-tax operating income increased 16.9%, or $41.2 million from
the prior year. Spread-based products after-tax operating income increased
19.0%, or $41.9 million from the prior year. The increase in the spread-based
business is primarily due to the increase in investment spreads of 17.2%, or
$59.1 million from the prior year. The increase in investment spreads was a
result of a higher average invested asset base, which increased 13.3%, or $2.7
billion from the prior year, combined with an 8 basis point increase in the
interest rate margin. The increase in interest rate margin is a result of income
earned on limited partnership and mortgage investments in the current period.
GICs and funding agreements accounted for 66.8% of segment after-tax operating
income compared to 67.0% in the prior year. On a total company basis, GICs and
funding agreements accounted for 23.1% of after-tax operating income compared to
20.3% in the prior year. Fee-based products after-tax operating income decreased
$0.7 million from the prior year, primarily due to lower risk based capital and
lower separate account risk charges.
Revenues decreased 26.0%, or $725.2 million from the prior year, largely
due to a decrease in premiums of 67.1%, or $604.0 million, driven by a $743.4
million decrease in single premium annuities premiums from the prior year.
Premiums decreased on lower sales of single premium annuities, which fell 92.7%,
or $750.7 million, from the prior year. We continue to look for opportunistic
sales in the single premium annuity market where our pricing standards are met.
Partially offsetting the decrease in premiums on single premium annuities was an
increase of 221.5%, or $138.0 million in premiums on structured settlement
products from the prior year. Net investment income decreased 6.6%, or $120.5
million from the prior year, despite growth of 13.3%, or $2.7 billion in the
spread-based average invested assets. Net investment income declined due to a
lower average investment yield, which fell to 6.41% from the prior year,
reflecting the lower interest rate environment in the current period. Net
investment income varies with market interest rates because the return on
approximately $10 billion, or 43.5% of the asset portfolio, floats with market
rates. In addition, new sales generate cash flows, which are invested at the
current market interest rates, which have decreased from the prior year.
Matching the interest
74
JOHN HANCOCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
rate exposure on our asset portfolio to the exposure on our liabilities is a
central feature of our asset/liability management process. Investment-type
product fees decreased $1.3 million from the prior year due to lower asset-based
fees on separate accounts, which was partially offset by higher fees on
structured settlement contracts.
Benefits and expenses decreased 32.4%, or $785.9 from the prior year. The
decrease was primarily due to lower benefits to policyholders as a result of
lower sales of single premium annuities. Benefits to policyholders for
spread-based products decreased 36.5%, or $773.3 million from the prior year,
due to lower sales of single premium annuity contracts, combined with lower
interest credited on account balances. Interest credited decreased 12.8%, or
$158.7 million, from the prior year. The decrease in interest credited was due
to a decline in the average interest credited rate on account balances for
spread-based products, due to the reset of approximately $10 billion of
liabilities with floating rates and new business added at current market rates.
The average crediting rate fell to 4.93% from 6.35% in the prior year. Other
operating costs and expenses increased 8.2%, or $4.9 million from the prior
year. This increase was driven by higher product development costs, commissions
on structured settlement sales, state taxes, licenses, and fees, and corporate
communications costs. Dividends to policyholders increased 28.8%, or $10.4
million from the prior year. The segment's effective tax rate on operating
income was 33.1% compared to 33.3% in the prior year.
75
JOHN HANCOCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
Investment Management Segment. The following table presents certain summary
financial data relating to the Investment Management Segment for the periods
indicated.
For the Years Ended December 31,
--------------------------------
2003 2002 2001
---- ---- ----
(in millions)
Operating Results:
Revenues
Net investment income ........................................ $ 17.1 $ 15.1 $ 28.7
Net realized investment and other gains (losses), net (1) .... 11.5 1.2 3.2
Investment management revenues, commissions, and other fees .. 115.2 108.2 111.3
Other revenue ................................................ 1.2 0.1 --
------------------------------------
Total revenues ......................................... 145.0 124.6 143.2
------------------------------------
Benefits and expenses
Other operating costs and expenses ........................... 97.0 90.9 96.4
------------------------------------
Total benefits and expenses ............................ 97.0 90.9 96.4
------------------------------------
Segment pre-tax operating income (1) ................... 48.0 33.7 46.8
Income taxes ....................................................... 18.2 12.5 17.0
------------------------------------
Segment after-tax operating income (1) ................. 29.8 21.2 29.8
After-tax adjustments: (1)
Net realized investment and other gains (losses) ............. (0.5) 0.4 (0.2)
Restructuring charges ........................................ -- (0.8) (0.9)
Surplus tax .................................................. -- -- 0.1
------------------------------------
Total after-tax adjustments ............................ (0.5) (0.4) (1.0)
GAAP Reported:
Income before cumulative effect of accounting changes .............. 29.3 20.8 28.8
Cumulative effect of accounting changes, net of tax .......... -- -- (0.2)
------------------------------------
Net income ......................................................... $ 29.3 $ 20.8 $ 28.6
====================================
Amortization of goodwill, net of tax ......................... -- -- 0.5
------------------------------------
Net income before amortization of goodwill ......................... $ 29.3 $ 20.8 $ 29.1
------------------------------------
Other Data:
Assets under management, end of year (2) ........................... $27,856.8 $27,874.7 $28,921.8
- -----------
(1) See "Results of operations by Segment and Adjustments to GAAP Reported Net
Income" included in this Management's Discussion and Analysis.
(2) Includes general account cash and invested assets of $79.5 million, $383.1
million and $151.3 million, as of December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001,
respectively.
76
JOHN HANCOCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
Year Ended December 31, 2003 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2002
Segment after-tax operating income increased $8.6 million, or 40.6%, from
the prior year. The increase was primarily due to an increase of $10.3 million
in net realized investment and other gains and an increase of $7.0 million in
investment management revenues, commission and other fees and partially offset
by an increase of $6.1 million in benefits and expenses. The increase in net
realized investment and other gains resulted primarily from mortgage
securitizations which are part of the operating revenues of our real estate
finance business. The increase in investment management revenues, commission and
other fees was primarily from timber property management fees and from private
equity funds. Benefits and expenses increased primarily on higher operating
expenses from timber property management activity.
Total revenues increased $20.4 million, or 16.4%, from the prior year. Net
investment income increased $2.0 million, or 13.2%, to $17.1 million, primarily
from increases in equity method income of $3.8 on limited partnership energy
investments at John Hancock Energy Resources Management due to the required
adoption of fair value accounting at the limited partnerships offset by a
decrease of $1.3 million at John Hancock Real Estate Finance due to a lower
average level of warehoused commercial mortgages. Investment management
revenues, commissions, and other fees increased $7.0 million, or 6.5%, from the
prior year. Advisory fees at the Hancock Natural Resource Group increased $8.2
million, or 35.0%, primarily from property management revenue at the new
northwest property management division, which was established in December of
2002. One of the Hancock Natural Resource Group's strategies is to vertically
integrate its operations in the timber business and the establishment of the
northwest property management division is one of the steps taken to implement
that strategy. Mortgage origination and servicing fees at John Hancock Real
Estate Finance increased $1.4 million, or 21.2 %, from 2002 mostly from a higher
volume of loans generated for the Company's General Account and from higher
securitized assets under management. Advisory fees at the Company's Bond and
Corporate Finance Group increased by $1.1 million, or 7.7%, from increases of
$2.6 million from its general partnership investment in private equity funds and
a $1.0 million increase in fees on third party pension assets offset by $2.5
million in lower fees from CDO funds. Offsetting these increases, advisory fees
at the Company's institutional investment advisor, the Independence group of
companies (Independence), were down $3.3 million, or 6.0%. This decrease
reflects lower fees on lower average assets under management of $0.6 billion and
a shift from equity to fixed income assets which have lower fee rates and from
the closure of the managed accounts business. John Hancock Realty Advisors' fees
decreased $0.5 million, or 5.4%, reflecting lower acquisition fees based on
lower acquisition activity offset by higher management fees on higher assets
under management. Investment management revenues, commissions and other fees
were 0.41% and 0.39% of average advisory assets under management in 2003 and
2002, respectively, for the segment. Net realized investment and other gains
increased $10.3 million mainly from an improvement in net realized gains of $9.6
million at John Hancock Real Estate Finance, primarily due to higher
profitability on a higher volume of commercial mortgage securitizations.
Other operating costs and expenses increased $6.1 million, or 6.7%, from
the prior year. Operating expenses were up $8.2 million at Hancock Natural
Resource Group, reflecting $4.3 million in increased expenses for the northwest
property management division and from an increase of $3.8 million in incentive
compensation expenses. Operating expenses at Independence increased $0.1
million, mostly from $1.6 million of higher personnel severance expenses and
$0.9 million in higher fixed income commission expenses offset by expense
savings primarily from ongoing expense management in 2003. John Hancock Real
Estate Finance had $0.4 million, or 4.3%, of lower operating expenses in 2003 on
lower interest expenses from lower average levels of borrowings on a lower
average level of warehoused commercial mortgages and from lower prevailing
interest rates. Operating expenses at John Hancock Realty Advisors declined $0.4
million, or 10.3%, reflecting lower acquisition activity. The segment's
effective tax rate on operating income was 37.9% compared to 37.1% in the prior
year. The effective tax rate for the Investment Management Segment remains
higher than for our other U.S. based business operating segments due to state
taxes on certain investment management subsidiaries, and reduced tax benefits
from portfolio holdings in this segment.
Year Ended December 31, 2002 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2001
Segment after-tax operating income decreased $8.6 million, or 28.9%, from
the prior year. The decline was primarily due to a drop of $13.6 million, or
47.4%, in net investment income, offset by a decrease of $5.5 million, or 5.7%,
in benefits and expenses. The decrease in net investment income resulted
primarily from non-recurring prior year income on the sale of investments at
John Hancock Energy Resource Management and from a lower level of commercial
mortgages held for sale this year at John Hancock Real Estate Finance. The
decrease in expenses was primarily due to lower interest expense at John Hancock
Real Estate Finance and operating expense savings at Hancock Natural Resource
Group, offset by increased operating expenses at Independence Investments LLC
due to higher compensation this year.
77
JOHN HANCOCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
Total revenues decreased $18.6 million, or 13.0%, from the prior year. Net
investment income declined $13.6 million, or 47.4%, to $15.1 million. Net
investment income was down $6.6 million, or 95.7%, at John Hancock Energy
Resources Management due to prior year income recognized from investment
partnerships on the liquidation of underlying investments and down $5.4 million,
or 37.8%, at John Hancock Real Estate Finance due to a lower average level of
warehoused commercial mortgages. Investment management revenues, commissions,
and other fees decreased $3.1 million, or 2.8% from the prior year. Advisory
fees at Independence Investment LLC were down $8.6 million, or 13.6% based on
declines in average assets under management which resulted from market
depreciation of $3.0 billion offset by $1.1 billion of net sales. John Hancock
Realty Advisors saw an increase of $3.5 million, or 61.4%, in higher portfolio
acquisition fees based on higher acquisition activity compared to the prior
year. Hancock Natural Resource Group saw an increase of $2.4 million, or 11.4%
over the prior year, primarily based on higher management fees earned from
higher assets under management. Mortgage origination and servicing fees at John
Hancock Real Estate Finance were $6.6 million for both 2002 and 2001. Investment
management revenues, commissions and other fees were 0.39% and 0.38% of average
advisory assets under management in 2002 and 2001, respectively, for the
segment. Net realized gains were down $2.0 million, or 62.5% at John Hancock
Real Estate Finance, primarily due to a lower level of commercial mortgage
securitizations.
Other operating costs and expenses declined $5.5 million, or 5.7% from the
prior year. John Hancock Real Estate Finance had $5.7 million of lower interest
expense compared to 2001, based on lower average levels of borrowings to support
lower average levels of warehoused commercial mortgages, and lower prevailing
interest rates. Operating expenses were down $4.9 million at Hancock Natural
Resource Group based on ongoing cost reduction efforts partially offset by
higher incentive compensation expense this year. Independence Investment LLC
operating expenses were up $5.2 million due to compensation increases over the
prior year. The segment's effective tax rate on operating income was 37.1%
compared to 36.2% in the prior year. The effective tax rate for the Investment
Management Segment remains higher than for our other U.S.-based business
operating segments due to state taxes on certain investment management
subsidiaries, and reduced tax benefits from portfolio holdings in this segment.
78
JOHN HANCOCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
Maritime Life Segment
In the first quarter of 2003, the Company implemented organizational
changes within the Corporate and Other Segment that resulted in reporting the
Maritime Life business as its own operating segment for the first time. The
Maritime Life Segment consists of our consolidated Canadian operations,
principally those of our Canadian life insurance business, The Maritime Life
Assurance Company (Maritime Life). The reclassifications associated with the
realignment of our operating segments had no impact on segment after-tax
operating income, or net income of the Maritime Life, or Corporate and Other
Segments, other than to display these segments separately. The following table
presents certain summary financial data relating to the Maritime Life Segment
for the periods indicated.
For the Years Ended December 31,
---------------------------------
2003 2002 2001
---------------------------------
(in millions)
Operating Results:
Revenue
Premiums ........................................................ $1,011.8 $ 681.3 $ 618.3
Universal life and investment-type product fees ................. 159.0 193.3 160.9
Net investment income ........................................... 339.1 313.0 282.1
Investment management revenues, commissions and other fees ...... 30.5 21.6 19.6
Other revenue ................................................... 17.6 13.5 (4.5)
---------------------------------
Total revenues ............................................ 1,558.0 1,222.7 1,076.4
Benefits and expenses
Benefits to policyholders ....................................... 1,078.7 840.3 709.7
Other operating costs and expenses .............................. 315.4 239.2 244.2
Amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs, excluding
amounts related to net realized investment and other gains
(losses) .................................................... (14.2) 17.5 43.9
Dividends to policyholders ...................................... 16.1 16.1 11.8
---------------------------------
Total benefits and expenses ................................ 1,396.0 1,113.1 1,009.6
---------------------------------
Segment pre-tax operating income (1) .................................. 162.0 109.6 66.8
Income taxes .......................................................... 56.9 40.6 18.9
---------------------------------
Segment after-tax operating income .................................... 105.1 69.0 47.9
After-tax adjustments: (1)
Net realized investment and other gains (losses), net ........... 14.4 (8.8) (3.1)
Restructuring charges ........................................... -- (0.3) (2.0)
---------------------------------
Total after-tax adjustments ................................ 14.4 (9.1) (5.1)
GAAP Reported:
Net Income ............................................................ $ 119.5 $ 59.9 $ 42.8
=================================
Amortization of goodwill, net of tax ............................ -- -- 5.0
---------------------------------
Net income before amortization of goodwill ............................ $ 119.5 $ 59.9 $ 47.8
---------------------------------
Other Data:
Segment after-tax operating income: (1)
Canadian protection ............................................. $ 46.4 $ 35.4 $ 40.0
Canadian asset gathering ........................................ 35.0 17.3 7.5
Canadian group life & health .................................... 24.6 21.3 20.1
Canadian corporate & other ...................................... (0.9) (5.0) (19.7)
- -----------
(1) See "Adjustments to GAAP Reported Net Income" included in this
Management's Discussion and Analysis.
Year Ended December 31, 2003 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2002
Segment after-tax operating income increased 52.3%, or $36.1 million, from
the prior year. Underlying this improvement was the impact of the Liberty Health
operations as a result of its acquisition as of July 1, 2003, which contributed
$7.6 million for the six-month period from date of acquisition. The asset
gathering business' after-tax operating income grew 102.3%, or $17.7 million,
from the prior year. DAC unlocking recorded in the prior year resulted in $10.9
million lower
79
JOHN HANCOCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
amortization in 2003. In addition, improving equity market returns further
lowered amortization $4.2 million through reduced VOBA and DAC amortization, net
of lower segregated fund fees. Other experience factors in the asset gathering
business contributed $6.9 million, including a $2.2 million improvement in net
investment income on capital allocated to this business. The retail protection
business after-tax operating income increased 31.1%, or $11.0 million, from the
prior year, including a $4.6 million increase in earnings from the acquired
Liberty Health individual health business, $0.8 million in natural growth and
$5.0 million positive experience in both the existing individual health and life
businesses. The group life & health operations increased 15.5%, or $3.3 million,
including $3.0 million from the acquired business, $4.3 million from prior year
pricing increases and in-force growth and $2.8 million of positive experience
factors, partially offset by $7.6 million of prior year favorable changes in
expected future claims levels for long-term disability reserves not repeated in
the current year. The corporate & other business had an after-tax loss of $0.9
million, a $4.1 million improvement from last year due primarily to income in a
subsidiary from a commission contract renegotiation of $3.4 million that is
offset by a higher commission expense in the retail protection business.
Total revenue increased 27.4%, or $335.3 million. Premiums increased
$330.5 million, driven by an increase of $223.0 million in the group life &
health business following a recapture of significant portions of its group life,
accidental death and dismemberment and long-term disability reinsurance and
including $100.8 million from the acquired group business. Premiums in the
retail protection business increased $72.7 million, including $32.7 million of
acquired individual health business. Asset gathering premiums increased $34.8
million, or 158.2%, due to sales of structured settlements and other immediate
annuities. Net investment income increased $26.1 million driven by higher assets
under management. Investment management revenues, commissions and other fees
increased 41.2%, or $8.9 million, from increased administrative services only
(ASO) business, including $6.1 million contributed by the acquired business.
Total benefits and expenses increased 25.4%, or $282.9 million, from the
prior year. Benefits to policyholders increased $238.4 million. The group life &
health business accounted for $193.1 million of this increase, primarily due to
the reinsurance recapture discussed above and the impact of the acquired
business of $85.6 million. Retail protection products increased $37.3 million,
driven by increased provisions for future policy benefits on traditional life
products and the impact of reinsurance recapture on claims, and $16.9 million of
acquired individual health business. The asset gathering business had an $8.0
million increase in benefits paid and accrued, due to business growth in the
structured settlement and immediate annuities products. Operating costs and
expenses increased 29.4%, or $59.4 million. Operating costs of the acquired
business account for $25.3 million of the year over year change. Increased group
life and health operating costs, excluding the acquired business, were $24.2
million higher than the previous year primarily reflecting lower reinsurance
allowances, and increased general expenses. The retail protection business had
$13.8 million of higher expenses, primarily higher employment-related expenses.
Commission costs of $121.7 million were $2.8 million higher than the prior year.
The increase reflects $4.4 million from the acquired operations, while
commission fell by $0.9 million in the group business and $2.1 million in asset
gathering due to lower sales in 2003. Deferred acquisition costs were $67.9
million in the current year, $14.0 million less than in 2002 due to lower sales
and deferrable costs. DAC amortization decreased by $31.7 million driven by
unlocking of $36.5 million to reflect continued refinement of US GAAP models,
stronger market returns and improved experience in expenses, investment margins
and lapses, offset by higher amortization of $4.8 million. The effective tax
rate fell to 35.1% in 2003 from 37.0% in 2002, as income taxes on higher taxable
income levels do not impact the level of fixed, capital taxes incurred. The
impact of foreign currency translation for the Maritime Life Segment is reported
in the Corporate and Other Segment.
Year Ended December 31, 2002 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2001
Segment after-tax operating income increased $21.1 million, or 44.1%, from
the prior year. The acquisition of Royal & Sun Alliance Life Insurance Company
of Canada (RSAF), concluded late in 2001, contributed $3.1 million to the
increase. The retail protection business decreased by $1.2 million from the
prior year, after a contribution of $1.6 million from RSAF. An accounting
provision for $3.2 million due to a decision to delay repricing of a critical
illnesses product following a change in reinsurance terms and refined allocation
of corporate overhead of $4.9 million were partially offset by refinements to
estimated gross profits for investment and expense experience for universal life
products that resulted in a DAC unlocking and revisions to reserves of $3.2
million and positive mortality, surrenders and expense experience of $2.0
million. The asset gathering business after-tax income increased $11.3 million
over the prior year, including $1.8 million from RSAF, favorable margin
increases of $2.6 million and refined allocation of corporate overhead of $3.3
million. In addition, a review of the valuation of DAC on segregated funds
products (separate accounts) was completed, resulting in a $5.9 million
reduction of DAC amortization. In the group business, changes in the expected
future claim levels for long-term disability products contributed $8.9 million,
partially offset by recognition of $1.3 million for uncollectible receivables
and higher interdivisional charges of $4.3 million. In corporate and other, the
impact of no longer amortizing goodwill due to adoption of SFAS No. 142 in 2001
improved current year's earnings by $5.0 million, lower integration costs
contributed $1.9 million, and a special research and development tax recovery of
$0.9 million, and refined allocation of corporate overhead of $11.6 million were
offset by increased interest expense of $5.9 million on debt used in part to
finance the RSAF acquisition.
80
JOHN HANCOCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
Total revenue increased by $146.3 million. Premiums increased by $63.0
million of which $39.8 million relates to the RSAF business included for the
full year in 2002, $16.6 million due to higher group renewal rates and new sales
and $6.5 million pertains to currency fluctuation between the Canadian and US
dollar. Universal life and investment product fees increased by $32.4 million,
primarily due to $28.7 million from RSAF and $1.8 million from foreign currency
translation. Net investment income increased $30.9 million with $26.3 million
due to the higher asset base after the RSAF acquisition and $3.0 million due to
foreign currency translation. Other income increased by $18.0 million, primarily
from gains in the traditional participating business not affecting shareholder
income of $16.3 million and a research and development tax recovery of $1.4
million.
Total benefits and expenses increased $103.5 million from the prior year.
Benefits to policyholders increased $130.6 million with $75.5 million in the
retail protection business, including $70.5 million from RSAF business and a
$5.0 million contingent liability for estimated losses on critical needs
products following a decision to delay re-pricing following a change of
reinsurance terms, $45.7 million in increased group life & health claims and
$14.3 million in changes to expected future claim levels for long-term
disability products. Other operating costs and expenses decreased $5.0 million.
A review of DAC and amortization methodologies in both the retail protection
businesses and the asset gathering businesses resulted in a year over year $22.0
million increase in DAC. In addition, commissions decreased by $6.3 million
primarily due to lower asset based compensation reflecting equity market
decreases, and a decrease in sales from prior year levels. Also, no longer
amortizing goodwill reduced expenses by $5.0 million, however this was offset by
growth in operating expenses of $12.7 million including $4.6 million due to a
full year of RSAF operations, and other acquisition-related items including $5.9
million of increased interest expense, and $2.2 million higher VOBA
amortization. The DAC review also resulted in lower DAC amortization of $26.4
million. Policyholder dividends increased $4.3 million, primarily related to the
additional participating business from RSAF. The effective tax rate on operating
income increased to 37.0% in 2002 compared to 28.3% in the prior year related to
changes in Canadian tax laws that reduced rates in future years and thus reduced
the future tax liability in 2001. On a "same tax rate" basis, operating income
would have increased by about $28.6 million, rather than the year over year
increase of $21.1 million.
81
JOHN HANCOCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
Corporate and Other Segment. The following table presents certain summary
financial data relating to the Corporate and Other Segment for the periods
indicated.
For the Years
Ended December 31,
---------------------------
2003 2002 2001
---------------------------
(in millions)
Operating Results:
Segment after-tax operating income(1)
International operations ............................... $ 9.8 $ 6.1 $ 3.9
Corporate operations ................................... (66.5) 1.6 23.7
Non-core businesses .................................... 3.4 3.7 9.2
---------------------------
Total ............................................ (53.3) 11.4 36.8
After-tax adjustments(1):
Net realized investment and other gains (losses), net .. 193.8 (19.1) 16.4
Class action lawsuit ................................... -- (0.8) (19.5)
Restructuring charges .................................. -- 3.0 (1.3)
Surplus tax ............................................ -- -- 0.9
---------------------------
Total after-tax adjustments ...................... 193.8 (16.9) (3.5)
---------------------------
GAAP Reported:
Income before cumulative effect of accounting changes .. 140.5 (5.5) 33.3
Cumulative effect of accounting changes, net of tax .... -- -- (2.6)
---------------------------
Net income ....................................... $140.5 $ (5.5) $ 30.7
===========================
Amortization of goodwill, net of tax ................... -- -- 0.1
---------------------------
Net income before amortization of goodwill ............. $140.5 $ (5.5) $ 30.8
---------------------------
- -----------
(1) See "Adjustments to GAAP Reported Net Income" included in this
Management's Discussion and Analysis.
(2) In 2002, during its start-up phase, the Federal long-term care insurance
business was reported in the Corporate and Other Segment. Effective
January 1, 2003, the program and its prior year results were reclassified
from the Corporate and Other Segment to the Protection Segment.
Year Ended December 31, 2003 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2002
After-tax operating income from international operations increased $3.7
million, or 60.7%, from the prior year. The increase was due to a $2.2 million
or 28.9% improvement in the earnings of our International Group Program due to
growth, higher earned retention income and currency gains. Results from our
Direct Foreign Operations, which consist of operations in Southeast Asia and
China, were a $0.1 million loss, which is a $1.5 million improvement due to
improved operating results in Singapore, Malaysia and the Philippines and also
due to reduced costs in China.
After-tax operating loss from corporate operations was $66.5 million
compared to income of $1.6 million in the prior year. Investment income on
corporate surplus was $46.1 million lower due to increased surplus requirements
from growth in several of our capital intense businesses. Group Life after-tax
operating income was $7.8 million lower reflecting a sale of the Group Life
business to MetLife effective May 1, 2003. Other expense increases in our
corporate account were driven by a $32.0 million increase for net periodic
pension costs, $6.7 million reduction in rent reimbursements due to the sale of
the Home Office, and merger related expenses in our holding company and
corporate account of $4.1 million and $2.5 million respectively. This was
partially offset by our corporate owned life insurance program that increased
$15.8 million due to an increase in the asset base and to improved performance
of the separate account assets supporting some of the program. The impact of
currency fluctuations for Maritime Life are included in corporate operations,
after-tax gains of $13.1 million resulted in 2003. Other subsidiaries with
after-tax improvement include JH Leasing with $1.1 million increase in profit
and Signature Fruit Company with a $0.9 million reduction in loss.
After-tax operating income from non-core businesses decreased $0.3
million, or 8.1% from the prior year. We continue with the orderly run-off of
business in this segment.
82
JOHN HANCOCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
Year Ended December 31, 2002 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2001
After-tax operating income from international operations increased $2.2
million or 56.4% from the prior year. The increase was due to a $3.0 million or
65.2% improvement in the earnings of our International Group Program. Earnings
from our Direct Foreign Operations decreased about $0.8 million.
After-tax operating income from corporate operations decreased $22.1
million, or 93.2% from the prior year. The decrease was due to a decrease in net
periodic pension credits of $21.1 million, a decrease in other post-employment
benefit credits of $1.7 million, and increased interest expense of $16.1 million
as a result of senior notes issued by our holding company in the fourth quarter
of 2001. Partially offsetting these decreases was the impact of our
corporate-owned life insurance program. The corporate-owned life insurance
program's results were $20.8 million favorable due to an increase in the asset
base and improved performance of the underlying assets.
After-tax operating income from non-core businesses decreased $5.5
million, or 59.8% from the prior year. We continue with the orderly run-off of
business in this segment.
83
JOHN HANCOCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
General Account Investments
We manage our general account assets in investment segments that support
specific classes of product liabilities. These investment segments permit us to
implement investment policies that both support the financial characteristics of
the underlying liabilities, and also provide returns on our invested capital.
The investment segments also enable us to gauge the performance and
profitability of our various businesses.
Asset/Liability Risk Management
Our primary investment objective is to maximize after-tax returns within
acceptable risk parameters. We are exposed to two primary types of investment
risk:
o Interest rate risk, meaning changes in the market value of fixed maturity
securities as interest rates change over time, and
o Credit risk, meaning uncertainties associated with the continued ability
of an obligor to make timely payments of principal and interest
We use a variety of techniques to control interest rate risk in our
portfolio of assets and liabilities. In general, our risk management philosophy
is to limit the net impact of interest rate changes on our assets and
liabilities. Assets are invested predominantly in fixed income securities, and
the asset portfolio is matched with the liabilities so as to eliminate the
Company's exposure to changes in the overall level of interest rates. Each
investment segment holds bonds, mortgages, and other asset types that will
satisfy the projected cash needs of its underlying liabilities. Another
important aspect of our asset-liability management efforts is the use of
interest rate derivatives. We selectively apply derivative instruments, such as
interest rate swaps and futures, to reduce the interest rate risk inherent in
combined portfolios of assets and liabilities. For a more complete discussion of
our interest rate risk management practices, please see the Interest Rate Risk
section in the Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
section of this document.
Management of credit risk is central to our business and we devote
considerable resources to the credit analysis underlying each investment
acquisition. Our corporate bond management group employs a staff of highly
specialized, experienced, and well-trained credit analysts. We rely on these
analysts' ability to analyze complex private financing transactions and to
acquire the investments needed to profitably fund our liability requirements. In
addition, when investing in private fixed maturity securities, we rely upon
broad access to proprietary management information, negotiated protective
covenants, call protection features and collateral protection.
Our bond portfolio is reviewed on a continuous basis to assess the
integrity of current quality ratings. As circumstances warrant, specific
investments are "re-rated" with the adjusted quality ratings reflected in our
investment system. All bonds are evaluated regularly against the following
criteria:
o material declines in the issuer's revenues or margins;
o significant management or organizational changes;
o significant uncertainty regarding the issuer's industry;
o debt service coverage or cash flow ratios that fall below
industry-specific thresholds;
o violation of financial covenants; and
o other business factors that relate to the issuer.
Insurance product prices are impacted by investment results. Accordingly,
incorporated into insurance product prices is assumptions of expected default
losses over the long term. Actual losses may therefore vary above and below this
average, and the market value of the portfolio as a whole also changes as market
credit spreads move up and down during an economic cycle.
84
JOHN HANCOCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
John Hancock is able to hold to this investment strategy over the long term,
both because of its strong capital position, the fixed nature of its liabilities
and the matching of those liabilities with assets, and because of the experience
gained through many decades of a consistent investment philosophy. We generally
intend to hold all of our fixed maturity investments to maturity to meet
liability payments, and to ride out any unrealized gains and losses over the
long term. However, we do sell bonds under certain circumstances, such as when
new information causes us to change our assessment of whether a bond will
recover or perform according to its contractual terms, in response to external
events (such as a merger or a downgrade) that result in investment guideline
violations (such as single issuer or overall portfolio credit quality limits),
in response to extreme catastrophic events (such as September 11, 2001) that
result in industry or market wide disruption, or to take advantage of tender
offers.
Overall Composition of the General Account. Invested assets, excluding separate
accounts, totaled $76.2 billion and $67.1 billion as of December 31, 2003 and
December 31, 2002, respectively. Invested assets have grown 13.5% over the year.
Included in this growth are $5.8 billion of fixed income securities and $1.9
billion of cash and cash equivalents. The following table shows the composition
of investments in the general account portfolio.
As of December 31,
----------------------------------------------
2003 2002
----------------------- ----------------------
Carrying % of Carrying % of
Value Total Value Total
----------------------- ----------------------
Fixed maturity securities(1) .. $53,427.8 70.1% $47,598.4 70.9%
Mortgage loans(2) ............. 12,936.0 17.0 11,805.7 17.6
Real estate ................... 195.0 0.3 318.6 0.5
Policy loans(3) ............... 2,117.9 2.8 2,097.2 3.1
Equity securities ............. 1,243.5 1.6 968.6 1.4
Other invested assets (4) ..... 3,011.3 4.0 2,937.8 4.4
Short-term investments ........ 121.6 0.2 211.2 0.3
Cash and cash equivalents(5) .. 3,121.6 4.0 1,190.6 1.8
----------------------------------------------
Total invested assets ......... $76,174.7 100.0% $67,128.1 100.0%
======================= ======================
(1) In addition to bonds, the fixed maturity security portfolio contains
redeemable preferred stock with a carrying value of $606.3 million and
$593.3 million as of December 31, 2003 and December 31, 2002,
respectively. The total fair value of the fixed maturity security
portfolio was $53,452.2 million and $47,648.0 million, at December 31,
2003 and December 31, 2002, respectively.
(2) The fair value for the mortgage loan portfolio was $13,979.5 million and
$12,726.1 million as of December 31, 2003 and December 31, 2002,
respectively.
(3) Policy loans are secured by the cash value of the underlying life
insurance policies and do not mature in a conventional sense, but expire
in conjunction with the related policy liabilities.
(4) Other invested assets as of December 31, 2002 contains a receivable of
$471.1 million from Allmerica Financial Corporation pursuant to the
Company's agreement to reinsure Allmerica's fixed universal life insurance
business. At December 31, 2003, the acquisition accounting was finalized
and these assets are reflected in the applicable line items in the
portfolio detail above.
(5) Cash and cash equivalents are included in total invested assets in the
table above for the purposes of calculating yields on the income producing
assets for the Company.
Consistent with the nature of the liabilities associated with the Company's
products, assets are heavily oriented toward fixed maturity securities. The
Company determines the allocation of assets primarily on the basis of cash flow
and return requirements of its products and by the level of investment risk.
Fixed Maturity Securities. The fixed maturity securities portfolio is
predominantly comprised of low risk, investment grade, publicly and privately
traded corporate bonds and senior tranches of asset-backed securities (ABS) and
mortgage-backed securities (MBS). The fixed maturity securities portfolio also
includes redeemable preferred stock. As of
85
JOHN HANCOCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
December 31, 2003, fixed maturity securities represented 70.1% of general
account invested assets with a carrying value of $53.4 billion, comprised of
51.9% public securities and 48.1% private securities. Each year, the Company
directs the majority of net cash inflows into investment grade fixed maturity
securities. Typically, between 5% and 15% of funds allocated to fixed maturity
securities are invested in below-investment-grade bonds while maintaining a
policy to target the overall level of these bonds to no more than 9.5% of
invested assets and to target the majority of that balance in the BB category.
The Company has established a two year target of limiting investments in below
investment grade bonds to 9% and 8% of invested assets by year end 2004 and
2005, respectively, for its U.S. life insurance companies on a statutory
accounting basis. As of December 31, 2003 below investment grade bonds were 8.1%
of invested assets, and 11.6% of total fixed maturities on a total Company U.S.
GAAP basis. As of December 31, 2003 below investment grade bonds were 9.2% of
statutory invested assets. Allocations are based on an assessment of relative
value and the likelihood of enhancing risk-adjusted portfolio returns. While the
Company has profited from the below-investment-grade asset class in the past,
care is taken to manage its growth strategically by limiting its size relative
to the Company's total assets.
The Securities Valuation Office (SVO) of the National Association of Insurance
Commissioners evaluates all public and private bonds purchased as investments by
insurance companies. The SVO assigns one of six investment categories to each
security it reviews. Category 1 is the highest quality rating, and Category 6 is
the lowest. Categories 1 and 2 are the equivalent of investment grade debt as
defined by rating agencies such as S&P and Moody's (i.e., BBB-/Baa3 or higher),
while Categories 3-6 are the equivalent of below-investment grade securities.
SVO ratings are reviewed and may be revised at least once a year.
The following table shows the composition by credit quality of the fixed
maturity securities portfolio,
Fixed Maturity Securities - By Credit Quality
As of December 31,
---------------------------------------------------------
2003 2002
---------------------------------------------------------
SVO S&P Equivalent Carrying % of Carrying % of
Rating(1) Designation (2) Value (3)(4) Total Value (3)(4)(5) Total
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(in millions) (in millions)
1 AAA/AA/A......................................... $24,132.3 45.7% $20,635.7 43.9%
2 BBB.............................................. 22,503.1 42.6 21,107.5 44.9
3 BB............................................... 2,999.3 5.7 2,626.7 5.6
4 B................................................ 1,922.4 3.6 1,223.5 2.6
5 CCC and lower.................................... 853.5 1.6 776.4 1.7
6 In or near default............................... 410.9 0.8 635.3 1.3
--------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal......................................... $52,821.5 100.0% 47,005.1 100.0%
Redeemable preferred stock....................... 606.3 593.3
--------------------------------------------------------
Total fixed maturities........................... $53,427.8 $47,598.4
========================================================
(1) For securities that are awaiting an SVO rating, the Company has assigned a
rating based on an analysis that it believes is equivalent to that used by
the SVO.
(2) Comparisons between SVO and S&P ratings are published by the National
Association of Insurance Commissioners.
(3) Includes 175 securities that are awaiting an SVO rating, with a carrying
value of $4,066.9 million as of December 31, 2003. Due to lags between the
funding of an investment, the processing of final legal documents, the
filing with the SVO, and the rating by the SVO, there will always be a
number of unrated securities at each statement date.
(4) Includes the effect of $130.0 million notional invested in the company's
credit-linked note program; $110.0 million notional of written credit
default swaps on fixed maturity securities in the AAA/AA/A category and
$20.0 million notional of written credit default swaps on fixed maturity
securities in the BBB category. As of December 31, 2002 the company had
$55.0 million notional invested in the credit-linked note program; $10.0
million notional written credit default swaps on fixed maturity securities
in the AAA/AA/A category and $45.0 million notional of written credit
default swaps on fixed maturity securities in the BBB category.
(5) The Company entered into a credit enhancement agreement in the form of a
guaranty from an AAA rated financial guarantor in 1996. To reflect the
impact of this guaranty on the overall portfolio, the Company has
presented securities covered in aggregate by the guaranty at rating levels
provided by the SVO and Moody's that reflect the guaranty. As a result,
$421.0 million of SVO Rating 3, $185.2 million of SVO Rating 4, and $7.6
million of SVO Rating 5 underlying securities are included as $397.6
million of SVO Rating 1, $162.1 million of SVO Rating 2, and $54.1 million
of SVO Rating 3 as of December 31, 2003 and $94.0 million of SVO Rating 2,
$718.0 million of SVO
86
JOHN HANCOCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
Rating 3, and $141.3 million of SVO Rating 4 underlying securities are
included as $753.2 million of SVO Rating 1, $150.1 million of SVO Rating 2
and $50.0 million of SVO Rating 3 as of December 31, 2002. The guaranty
also contains a provision that the guarantor can recover from the Company
certain amounts paid over the history of the program in the event a
payment is required under the guaranty. As of December 31, 2003 and
December 31, 2002, the maximum amount that can be recovered under this
provision was $112.8 million and $82.3 million, respectively.
The table above sets forth the SVO ratings for the bond portfolio along
with an equivalent S&P rating agency designation. The majority of the fixed
maturity investments rated by the SVO are investment grade, with 88.3% and 88.8%
of fixed maturity investments invested in Category 1 and 2 securities as of
December 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively. Below investment grade bonds were
11.7% and 11.2% of fixed maturity investments rated by the SVO and 8.1% and 7.8%
of total invested assets as of December 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively. This
allocation reflects the Company strategy of avoiding the unpredictability of
interest rate risk in favor of relying on the Company's bond analysts' ability
to better predict credit or default risk. The bond analysts operate in an
industry-based, team-oriented structure that permits the evaluation of a wide
range of below investment grade offerings in a variety of industries resulting
in a well-diversified high yield portfolio.
Valuation techniques for the bond portfolio vary by security type and the
availability of market data. Pricing models and their underlying assumptions
impact the amount and timing of unrealized gains and losses recognized, and the
use of different pricing models or assumptions could produce different financial
results. External pricing services are used where available, and broker dealer
quotes are used for thinly traded securities. A spread pricing matrix is used
when price quotes are not available, which typically is the case for our private
placement securities. The spread pricing matrix is based on credit quality,
country of issue, market sector and average investment life and is created for
these dimensions through brokers' estimates of public spreads derived from their
respective publications. When utilizing the spread pricing matrix, securities
are valued through a discounted cash flow method where each bond is assigned a
spread, which is added to the current U.S. Treasury rates to discount the cash
flows of the security. The spread assigned to each security is changed from
month to month based on changes in the market. Certain market events that could
impact the valuation of securities include issuer credit ratings, business
climate, management changes, litigation, and government actions among others.
The resulting prices are then reviewed by the pricing analysts and members of
the Controller's Department. The Company's pricing analysts take appropriate
actions to reduce valuations of securities where such an event occurs which
negatively impacts the securities' value. Although the Company believes its
estimates reasonably reflect the fair value of those securities, the key
assumptions about risk premiums, performance of underlying collateral (if any)
and other factors involve significant assumptions and may not reflect those of
an active market. To the extent that bonds have longer maturity dates,
management's estimate of fair value may involve greater subjectivity since they
involve judgment about events well into the future. Then, every quarter, there
is a comprehensive review of all impaired securities and problem loans by a
group consisting of the Chief Investment Officer, Chief Risk Officer who reports
to the Chief Financial Officer and the Bond Investment Committee. The valuation
of impaired bonds for which there is no quoted price is typically based on the
present value of the future cash flows expected to be received. If the issuer is
likely to continue operations, the estimate of future cash flows is typically
based on the expected operating cash flows of the issuer that are available to
make payments on the bonds. If the issuer is likely to liquidate, the estimate
of future cash flows is based on an estimate of the liquidation value of its net
assets.
As of December 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively, 48.5% and 49.9% of our
below investment grade bonds are in Category 3, the highest quality below
investment grade. Category 6 bonds, those in or near default, represent
securities that were originally acquired as long-term investments, but
subsequently became distressed. The carrying value of bonds in or near default
was $410.9 million and $635.3 million as of December 31, 2003 and 2002,
respectively. For the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2002, $4.1 million and
$10.7 million of interest on bonds near default were included in accrued
investment income. Unless the Company reasonably expects to collect investment
income on bonds in or near default, the accrual will be ceased and any accrued
income reversed. Management judgment is used and the actual results could be
materially different.
In keeping with the investment philosophy of tightly managing interest
rate risk, the Company's MBS & ABS holdings are heavily concentrated in
commercial MBS where the underlying loans are largely call protected, which
means they are not pre-payable without penalty prior to maturity at the option
of the issuer. By investing in MBS and ABS securities with relatively
predictable repayments, the Company adds high quality, liquid assets to its
portfolios without incurring the risk of cash flow variability. The Company
believes the portion of its MBS/ABS portfolio subject to prepayment risk as of
December 31, 2003 and December 31, 2002 was limited to 23.3% and 12.9% of our
total MBS/ABS portfolio and 3.5% and 2.1% of our total fixed maturity securities
holdings, respectively.
87
JOHN HANCOCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
The following table shows the composition by our internal industry
classification of the fixed maturity securities portfolio and the unrealized
gains and losses contained therein.
Fixed Maturity Securities - By Industry Classification/Sector
Investment Grade as of December 31, 2003
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Carrying
Value of Carrying Value
Securities of Securities
Net with Gross Gross with Gross Gross
Total Carrying Unrealized Unrealized Unrealized Unrealized Unrealized
Value Gain (Loss) Gains Gains Losses Losses
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(in millions)
Corporate securities:
Banking and finance ............. $ 6,949.0 $ 393.6 $ 6,083.4 $ 406.6 $ 865.6 $ (13.0)
Communications .................. 2,917.7 236.8 2,504.3 245.9 413.4 (9.1)
Government ...................... 3,180.5 133.6 2,134.8 140.9 1,045.7 (7.3)
Manufacturing ................... 6,405.7 394.6 5,382.6 426.1 1,023.1 (31.5)
Oil & gas ....................... 3,975.1 349.4 3,804.6 355.0 170.5 (5.6)
Services / trade ................ 2,511.4 186.1 2,352.3 190.7 159.1 (4.6)
Transportation .................. 2,457.1 118.8 1,899.3 153.3 557.8 (34.5)
Utilities ....................... 7,733.4 577.9 6,939.4 603.2 794.0 (25.3)
Other ........................... 217.1 17.7 197.3 18.0 19.8 (0.3)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total corporate securities ........ 36,347.0 2,408.5 31,298.0 2,539.7 5,049.0 (131.2)
Asset-backed and mortgage-
backed securities ................ 7,746.9 231.4 5,868.0 312.8 1,878.9 (81.4)
U.S. Treasury securities and
obligations of U.S. government
agencies ......................... 300.4 3.4 120.9 4.9 179.5 (1.5)
Debt securities issued by foreign
governments (1) .................. 2,183.8 240.6 2,049.2 242.8 134.6 (2.2)
Obligations of states and political
subdivisions ..................... 446.0 16.5 349.6 17.8 96.4 (1.3)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total ........................... $47,024.1 $ 2,900.4 $39,685.7 $ 3,118.0 $ 7,338.4 $ (217.6)
====================================================================================
- -----------
(1) Includes $1,905.2 million in debt securities held in Maritime Life, our
Canadian insurance subsidiary, and issued and fully supported by various
Canadian Federal, provincial or municipal governments.
88
JOHN HANCOCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
Below Investment Grade as of December 31, 2003
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Carrying
Value of Carrying Value
Securities of Securities
Net with Gross Gross with Gross Gross
Total Carrying Unrealized Unrealized Unrealized Unrealized Unrealized
Value Gain(Loss) Gains Gains Losses Losses
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(in millions)
Corporate securities:
Banking and finance ............. $ 113.4 $ (3.6) $ 84.3 $ 2.7 $ 29.1 $ (6.3)
Communications .................. 209.3 8.4 110.9 17.7 98.4 (9.3)
Government ...................... 11.0 (0.4) 1.5 0.2 9.5 (0.6)
Manufacturing ................... 1,433.7 62.7 1,008.0 94.0 425.7 (31.3)
Oil & gas ....................... 674.8 (31.5) 415.3 21.5 259.5 (53.0)
Services / trade ................ 438.7 45.9 331.8 51.4 106.9 (5.5)
Transportation .................. 508.6 (14.3) 183.3 30.0 325.3 (44.3)
Utilities ....................... 2,615.7 107.2 1,846.0 154.4 769.7 (47.2)
Other ........................... 4.4 0.4 4.4 0.4 -- --
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total corporate securities ........ 6,009.6 174.8 3,985.5 372.3 2,024.1 (197.5)
Asset-backed and mortgage-
backed securities ................ 381.1 (61.2) 47.7 2.3 333.4 (63.5)
U.S. Treasury securities and
obligations of U.S. government
agencies ......................... -- -- -- -- -- --
Debt securities issued by foreign
governments ...................... 13.0 0.6 8.9 0.7 4.1 (0.1)
Obligations of states and political
subdivisions ..................... -- -- -- -- -- --
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total ........................... $6,403.7 $ 114.2 $4,042.1 $ 375.3 $2,361.6 $ (261.1)
================================================================================
As of December 31, 2003, there were $3,493.3 million of gross unrealized
gains and $478.7 million of gross unrealized losses on the fixed maturities
portfolio. The 2003 gross unrealized losses of $478.7 million include $417.6
million, or 87.2%, of unrealized losses concentrated in the utilities,
manufacturing, oil and gas, transportation and asset-backed and mortgage-backed
securities. The tables above show gross losses before amounts that are allocated
to the closed block policyholders or participating pension contractholders. Of
the $478.7 million of gross unrealized losses in the portfolio at December 31,
2003, $61.8 million is in the closed block and $20.2 million has been allocated
to participating pension contractholders, leaving $396.7 million of unrealized
losses after such allocations.
89
JOHN HANCOCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
Fixed Maturity Securities - By Industry Classification/Sector
Investment Grade as of December 31, 2002
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Carrying
Value of Carrying Value
Securities of Securities
Net with Gross Gross with Gross Gross
Total Carrying Unrealized Unrealized Unrealized Unrealized Unrealized
Value Gain (Loss) Gains Gains Losses Losses
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(in millions)
Corporate securities:
Banking and finance ............. $ 5,993.4 $ 254.0 $ 4,861.0 $ 286.3 $ 1,132.4 $ (32.3)
Communications .................. 2,128.6 128.7 1,833.6 139.9 295.0 (11.2)
Government ...................... 2,585.0 122.1 1,823.3 140.1 761.7 (18.0)
Manufacturing ................... 6,262.7 319.6 5,183.0 360.9 1,079.7 (41.3)
Oil & gas ....................... 3,838.7 201.3 3,149.6 269.9 689.1 (68.6)
Services / trade ................ 2,218.9 117.2 1,942.7 130.2 276.2 (13.0)
Transportation .................. 2,445.7 119.9 2,003.0 149.5 442.7 (29.6)
Utilities ....................... 6,924.9 190.8 5,248.1 361.4 1,676.8 (170.6)
Other ........................... 153.5 10.5 145.2 11.2 8.3 (0.7)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total corporate securities ........ 32,551.4 1,464.1 26,189.5 1,849.4 6,361.9 (385.3)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Asset-backed and mortgage-
backed securities ................ 7,601.0 251.9 6,084.9 421.1 1,516.1 (169.2)
U.S. Treasury securities and
obligations of U.S. government
agencies ......................... 221.7 10.7 205.9 10.9 15.8 (0.2)
Debt securities issued by foreign
governments (1) .................. 1,651.5 177.6 1,639.3 177.9 12.2 (0.3)
Obligations of states and political
subdivisions ..................... 318.6 23.6 315.2 23.7 3.4 (0.1)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total ........................... $42,344.2 $ 1,927.9 $34,434.8 $ 2,483.0 $ 7,909.4 $ (555.1)
====================================================================================
- -----------
(1) Includes $1,298.1 million in debt securities held in Maritime Life, our
Canadian insurance subsidiary, and issued and fully supported by various
Canadian Federal, provincial or municipal governments.
90
JOHN HANCOCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
Fixed Maturity Securities - By Industry Classification/Sector
Below Investment Grade as of December 31, 2002
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Carrying
Value of Carrying Value
Securities of Securities
Net with Gross Gross with Gross Gross
Total Carrying Unrealized Unrealized Unrealized Unrealized Unrealized
Value Gain (Loss) Gains Gains Losses Losses
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(in millions)
Corporate securities:
Banking and finance ............. $ 43.2 $ (19.2) $ 11.9 $ 0.5 $ 31.3 $ (19.7)
Communications .................. 188.9 (41.0) 33.7 0.1 155.2 (41.1)
Government ...................... 11.5 (0.8) 2.4 0.2 9.1 (1.0)
Manufacturing ................... 1,147.6 (110.4) 489.5 35.8 658.1 (146.2)
Oil & gas ....................... 618.6 (110.9) 267.3 10.6 351.3 (121.5)
Services / trade ................ 334.1 15.0 254.1 19.0 80.0 (4.0)
Transportation .................. 455.2 (82.1) 191.0 18.2 264.2 (100.3)
Utilities ....................... 2,162.6 (328.3) 689.4 39.4 1,473.2 (367.7)
Other ........................... 5.2 (0.7) 3.3 -- 1.9 (0.7)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total corporate securities ........ 4,966.9 (678.4) 1,942.6 123.8 3,024.3 (802.2)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Asset-backed and mortgage-
backed securities ................ 252.8 (106.3) 48.2 3.0 204.6 (109.3)
U.S. Treasury securities and
obligations of U.S. government
agencies ......................... -- -- -- -- -- --
Debt securities issued by foreign
governments ...................... 11.9 (2.1) 3.7 0.5 8.2 (2.6)
Obligations of states and political
subdivisions ..................... 22.6 0.8 22.6 0.8 -- --
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total ........................... $ 5,254.2 $ (786.0) $ 2,017.1 $ 128.1 $ 3,237.1 $ (914.1)
=================================================================================
As of December 31, 2002, there were $2,611.1 million of gross unrealized
gains and $1,469.2 million of gross unrealized losses on the fixed maturities
portfolio. The 2002 gross unrealized losses of $1,469.2 million include $1,324.3
million, or 90.1%, of unrealized losses concentrated in the utilities,
manufacturing, oil and gas, transportation, asset-backed and mortgage-backed
securities. Only the utilities sector had net unrealized losses. The tables
above show gross losses before amounts that are allocated to the closed block
policyholders or participating pension contractholders. Of the $1,469.2 million
of gross unrealized losses in the portfolio at December 31, 2002, $191.0 is in
the closed block and $62.6 million has been allocated to participating pension
contractholders, leaving $1,215.6 of unrealized losses after such allocations.
Unrealized losses can be created by rising interest rates or by rising
credit concerns and hence widening credit spreads. Credit concerns are apt to
play a larger role in the unrealized loss on below investment grade bonds and
hence the gross unrealized loss on the portfolio has been split between
investment grade and below investment grade bonds in the above tables. The gross
unrealized loss on below investment grade fixed maturity securities declined
from $914.1 million at December 31, 2002 to $261.1 million at December 31, 2003
primarily due to the easing of credit concerns and the resulting spread
tightening.
All sectors within the below investment grade portfolio saw a dramatic
drop in gross unrealized losses. Most notable was the drop in the gross
unrealized loss on the utility portfolio, from $367.7 million as of December 31,
2002 to $47.2 million as of December 31, 2003. While the excess capacity in this
sector will continue to pressure certain power regions and certain companies for
several years, the industry is in much better shape after a year of sharply
curtailed capital expenditures and general balance sheet strengthening.
91
JOHN HANCOCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
We remain most concerned about the airline sector. We lend to this
industry almost exclusively on a secured basis (approximately 99% of our loans
are secured). These secured airline financings are of two types: Equipment Trust
Certificates (ETC's) and Enhanced Equipment Trust Certificates (EETC's). The
ETC's initially have an 80% loan-to-value ratio and the EETC senior tranches
initially have a 40-50% loan-to-value and include a provision for a third party
to pay interest for eighteen months from a default. For us to lose money on an
ETC, three things must happen: the airline must default, the airline must decide
it does not want to fly our aircraft, and the aircraft must be worth less than
our loan. When lending to this industry, we underwrite both the airline and the
aircraft. We've been lending to this industry in this fashion for 25 years
through several economic cycles and have seen values on our secured airline
bonds fall and recover thorough these cycles. EETC's are classified as
asset-backed securities and they account for $58.6 million and $181.1 million of
the $144.9 million and $278.5 million of gross unrealized loss in the
asset-backed and mortgage-backed securities category as of December 31, 2003 and
December 31, 2002, respectively. While the airline industry is making positive
strides in reducing its cost structure, a significant recovery in this sector
requires a growing economy and a pick up in business travel. In the most recent
quarter ending December 31, 2003, most of the major carriers have reported
improved financial results. This trend is encouraging and we expect it to
continue barring any new terrorist events or a reversal of the course of the
U.S. economy. We do still expect that the senior secured nature of our loans to
this industry will protect our holdings through this difficult time.
The following table shows the composition by credit quality of the
securities with gross unrealized losses in our fixed maturity securities
portfolio. The gross unrealized loss on investment grade bonds (those rated in
categories 1 and 2 by the SVO) declined by $336.5 million for the year to $207.1
million. The gross unrealized loss on below investment grade bonds (those rated
in categories, 3, 4, 5 and 6 by the SVO) declined even more over this period,
dropping by $653.6 million to a total of $260.5 million at December 31, 2003.
Unrealized Losses on Fixed Maturity Securities - By Quality
As of December 31, 2003
----------------------------------------------------------
Carrying Value of
Securities with
SVO S&P Equivalent Gross Unrealized % of Gross Unrealized % of
Rating(1) Designation (2) Losses (3) Total Losses (3) Total
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(in millions) (in millions)
1 AAA/AA/A.......................... $ 4,860.6 51.3% $ (99.2) 21.2%
2 BBB............................... 2,247.6 23.7 (107.9) 23.1
3 BB................................ 673.2 7.1 (74.2) 15.9
4 B................................. 1,069.7 11.3 (90.6) 19.4
5 CCC and lower..................... 465.0 4.9 (84.8) 18.1
6 In or near default................ 151.3 1.7 (10.9) 2.3
----------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal................... 9,467.4 100.0% (467.6) 100.0%
Redeemable preferred stock........ 232.6 (11.1)
----------------------------------------------------------
Total...................... $ 9,700.0 $ (478.7)
==========================================================
(1) With respect to securities that are awaiting an SVO rating, the Company
has assigned a rating based on an analysis that it believes is equivalent
to that used by the SVO. Recent experience has shown that our ratings are
generally comparable to those of the SVO.
(2) Comparisons between SVO and S&P ratings are published by the National
Association of Insurance Commissioners.
(3) Includes 59 securities that are awaiting an SVO rating with a carrying
value of $1,798.1 million and unrealized losses of $27.4 million. Due to
lags between the funding of an investment, the processing of final legal
documents, the filing with the SVO, and the rating by the SVO, there will
always be a number of unrated securities at each statement date. Unrated
securities comprised 18.5% and 5.7% of the total carrying value and total
gross unrealized losses of securities in a loss position, including
redeemable preferred stock, respectively.
92
JOHN HANCOCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
Unrealized Losses on Fixed Maturity Securities -- By Quality
As of December 31, 2002
---------------------------------------------------------
Carrying Value of
Securities with
SVO S&P Equivalent Gross Unrealized % of Gross Unrealized % of
Rating (1) Designation (2) Losses (3) Total Losses (3) Total
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(in millions) (in millions)
1 AAA/AA/A....................... $ 3,375.3 31.0% $ (156.3) 10.7%
2 BBB............................ 4,267.9 39.2 (387.3) 26.6
3 BB............................. 1,634.5 15.0 (414.4) 28.4
4 B.............................. 691.5 6.4 (222.6) 15.3
5 CCC and lower.................. 541.8 5.0 (195.0) 13.4
6 In or near default............. 369.3 3.4 (82.1) 5.6
---------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal.................. 10,880.3 100.0% (1,457.7) 100.0%
Redeemable preferred stock..... 266.2 (11.5)
---------------------------------------------------------
Total.................... $ 11,146.5 $(1,469.2)
=========================================================
(1) With respect to securities that are awaiting an SVO rating, the Company
has assigned a rating based on an analysis that it believes is equivalent
to that used by the SVO.
(2) Comparisons between SVO and S&P ratings are published by the National
Association of Insurance Commissioners.
(3) Includes 71 securities that are awaiting an SVO rating with a carrying
value of $1,677.0 million and unrealized losses of $63.4 million. Due to
lags between the funding of an investment, the processing of final legal
documents, the filing with the SVO, and the rating by the SVO, there will
always be a number of unrated securities at each statement date. Unrated
securities comprised 15.0% and 4.3% of the total carrying value and total
gross unrealized losses of securities in a loss position, including
redeemable preferred stock, respectively.
93
JOHN HANCOCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
Unrealized Losses on Fixed Maturity Securities - By Investment Grade and Age
As of December 31, 2003
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Investment Grade Below Investment Grade
--------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------
Carrying Carrying
Value of Value of
Securities Securities
with Gross with Gross
Unrealized Hedging Market Unrealized Hedging Market
Losses Adjustments Depreciation Losses Adjustments Depreciation
--------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------
(in millions) (in millions)
Three months or less ....................... $2,006.9 $ (12.3) $ (19.2) $ 248.4 $ (3.8) $ (7.5)
Greater than three months to six months .... 1,422.8 (5.6) (28.3) 123.2 (1.8) (1.1)
Greater than six months to nine months ..... 947.3 (1.0) (33.2) 125.2 (2.5) (10.9)
Greater than nine months to twelve months .. 208.3 (14.0) (7.8) 196.2 (1.2) (2.8)
Greater than twelve months ................. 2,522.9 (43.7) (42.0) 1,666.2 (61.7) (167.2)
--------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------
Subtotal ........................... 7,108.2 (76.6) (130.5) 2,359.2 (71.0) (189.5)
--------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------
Redeemable preferred stock ................. 230.2 (0.1) (10.4) 2.4 -- (0.6)
--------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------
Total .............................. $7,338.4 $ (76.7) $ (140.9) $2,361.6 $ (71.0) $ (190.1)
======================================= =======================================
As of December 31, 2002
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Investment Grade Below Investment Grade
---------------------------------------- -------------------------------------
Carrying Carrying
Value of Value of
Securities Securities
with Gross with Gross
Unrealized Hedging Market Unrealized Hedging Market
Losses Adjustments Depreciation Losses Adjustments Depreciation
---------------------------------------- -------------------------------------
(in millions) (in millions)
Three months or less ........................ $2,255.2 $ (19.2) $ (48.7) $ 276.3 $ (2.2) $ (13.0)
Greater than three months to six months ..... 952.4 (16.0) (34.1) 406.2 (7.6) (113.8)
Greater than six months to nine months ...... 909.1 (35.0) (24.8) 566.4 (14.4) (78.1)
Greater than nine months to twelve months. .. 423.9 (12.6) (27.7) 393.4 (5.3) (61.4)
Greater than twelve months .................. 3,102.6 (70.1) (255.4) 1,594.8 (74.9) (543.4)
----------------------------------------- -------------------------------------
Subtotal ............................... 7,643.2 (152.9) (390.7) 3,237.1 (104.4) (809.7)
Redeemable preferred stock .................. 266.2 -- (11.5) -- -- --
---------------------------------------- -------------------------------------
Total .................................. $7,909.4 $ (152.9) $ (402.2) $3,237.1 $ (104.4) $ (809.7)
======================================== =====================================
The tables above show the Company's investment grade and below investment
grade securities that were in a loss position at December 31, 2003 and December
31, 2002 by the amount of time the security has been in a loss position. Gross
unrealized losses from hedging adjustments represent the amount of the
unrealized loss that results from the security being designated as a hedged item
in a fair value hedge. When a security is so designated, its cost basis is
adjusted in response to movements in interest rates. These adjustments, which
are non-cash and reverse over time as the asset and derivative mature, impact
the amount of unrealized loss on a security. The remaining portion of the gross
unrealized loss represents the impact of interest rates on the non-hedged
portion of the portfolio and unrealized losses due to creditworthiness on the
total fixed maturity portfolio.
At December 31, 2003 and December 31, 2002, respectively, the fixed
maturity securities had a total gross unrealized loss of $331.0 million and
$1,211.9 million, excluding basis adjustments related to hedging relationships.
Of these totals, $219.8 million and $887.9 million, respectively, are due to
securities that have had various amounts of unrealized loss for more than nine
months. Of this, $49.8 million and $283.1 million, respectively comes from
securities rated investment grade. Unrealized losses on investment grade
securities principally relate to changes in interest rates or changes in credit
spreads since the securities were acquired. Credit rating agencies' statistics
indicate that investment grade securities have been found to be less likely to
develop credit concerns.
94
JOHN HANCOCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
As of December 31, 2003 and December 31, 2002, $170.0 million and $604.8
million, respectively, of the $331.0 million and $1,211.9 million of gross
unrealized losses resides in below investment grade securities with various
amounts of unrealized loss for over nine months. At December 31, 2003, all of
these securities are current as to the payments of principal and interest with
the exception of 2 securities with a carrying value of $16.8 million and an
unrealized loss of $18.3 million. Of the total $170.0 million, $87.6 million
traded above 80% of amortized cost at December 31, 2003 and an additional $11.3
million traded above 80% of amortized cost within the last nine months, for a
total of $98.9 million. Of the total $98.9 million in this category, $58.1
million comes from airline related bonds, an industry that continues to
experience stress and hence has lagged the general recovery. While, as described
earlier, we expect the secured nature of our positions to protect our value, the
increased stress in this industry is of concern.
The remaining portion of the unrealized loss, $71.1 million, arises from
below investment grade securities that have traded below 80 percent of amortized
cost for over nine months. All of these bonds, with the exception of the 2
securities mentioned above, are current on payments of principal and interest
and we believe, based on currently available information that it is probable
that these securities will continue to pay based on their original terms. On the
2 securities on which interest is overdue, this interest was actually paid to
the trustee, but the investors chose to use these payments for expenses related
to protecting the collateral underlying the bonds rather than distribute them.
We carefully track these investments to ensure our continued belief that their
prices will recover. More detail on the most significant securities is contained
below:
o $28.2 million from a structured investment based on oil and gas
payments to an Argentine province. This transaction benefits from
(1) rights to 80% of the royalty payments received by the province,
(2) a six month debt service reserve located in the U.S., and (3) a
political risk insurance policy from a major reinsurer that will
take over payments in the event the government imposes transfer or
currency conversion limitations. Currently, the major risk is that
the local oil and gas companies are making payments to the province
based on a fixed exchange rate rather than the market exchange rate.
While the province is working to correct this, if it does not
change, the coverages on the bond will suffer and should oil and gas
prices drop, we may need to restructure our rights to royalty
payments to extend beyond the maturity of our bond, so a
restructuring would likely extend the term of our bond with
interest.
o $26.6 million on secured airline bonds: $17.6 million on senior
tranche, EETC's, $9.0 million on ETC's. The EETC's are backed by
planes of an airline currently in bankruptcy. These EETC's however,
are all current due to the 18 month liquidity facility with which to
make interest payments and in all three positions, the total loan
balance of the senior tranche is still less than the current
appraised value of the underlying aircraft. Accordingly, we expect
the market prices of these bonds to recover. The ETC's and the
subordinated EETC are backed by planes of major US airline that we
do not expect to file for bankruptcy and accordingly, we expect the
bond to recover.
o $9.4 million on a fertilizer plant that sources its natural gas from
PDVSA, the Venezuelan oil company. While the cost of the natural gas
in very inexpensive, there are concerns about the reliability of the
supply. Also, the plant experienced some start up operational
difficulties that now appear to have been fixed. Additionally, its
equity sponsors have supported the project with additional
contributions of equity and based on our review of this credit we
expect their continued support. Hence, we expect the price to
continue to recover.
o $5.2 million on the bond of a major telecommunications company. A
major portion of the value of this company is derived from its local
exchange business. The company has taken steps to de-leverage and is
expected to be in a positive cash flow position this year. As the
company continues to reduce leverage through cost cutting and asset
dispositions, we expect these securities to continue to recover in
value.
o $1.2 million markdown of an asset backed security resulting from a
bond being downgraded. The bankruptcy filing of the issuer/servicer
of the bond has caused significant performance deterioration on the
underlying collateral during December 2002 to June 2003. However,
performance has improved gradually since the service reorganization
which took place in June 2003.
The Company's investment grade and below investment grade bonds trading at
less than 80% of amortized cost for more than one year amounted to $76.1 million
as of December 31, 2003.
The Company believes that after its comprehensive review of each
borrower's ability to meet the obligations of the notes, and based on
information available at this time, these securities will continue to pay as
scheduled, and the Company has the ability and the intent to hold these
securities until they recover in value or mature. The scheduled maturity dates
for securities in an unrealized loss position at December 31, 2003 and 2002 are
shown below.
95
JOHN HANCOCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
Unrealized Losses on Fixed Maturity Securities - By Maturity
December 31, 2003 December 31, 2002
----------------- -----------------
Carrying Value of Gross Carrying Value of Gross
Securities with Gross Unrealized Securities with Gross Unrealized
Unrealized Loss Loss Unrealized Loss Loss
--------------- ---- --------------- ----
(in millions)
Due in one year or less.................................. $ 403.3 $ (11.8) $ 586.8 $ (37.9)
Due after one year through five years.................... 1,538.5 (75.5) 2,574.9 (273.2)
Due after five years through ten years................... 2,042.9 (105.0) 2,573.1 (429.9)
Due after ten years...................................... 3,503.0 (141.5) 3,691.0 (449.7)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
7,487.7 (333.8) 9,425.8 (1,190.7)
Asset-backed and mortgage-backed securities.............. 2,212.3 (144.9) 1,720.7 (278.5)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Total.............................................. $9,700.0 $(478.7) $11,146.5 $(1,469.2)
=======================================================================
As of December 31, 2003 we had 59 securities representing 9 credit
exposures that had unrealized losses of near $10 million or more. They include:
Amortized Unrealized Loss
Description of Issuer Cost
---------------------------------------
(in millions)
Argentinean trust holding rights to oil and gas royalty.................... $ 43.4 (28.2)
Notes secured by leases on a pool of aircraft.............................. 35.1 (18.3)
Securitized investment of aircraft......................................... 224.8 (17.8)
Secured financings to a large U.S. airline................................. 110.8 (15.6)
Venezuelan oil company with U.S. dollar based flows........................ 152.4 (15.2)
Major U.S airline.......................................................... 151.1 (10.6)
Major U.S. airline......................................................... 73.9 (10.5)
Finance subsidiary of U.S. paper/wood products manufacturer................ 215.6 (10.3)
Joint venture with a Venezuelan oil company................................ 41.2 (9.8)
---------------------------------------
Total............................................................ $1,048.3 $(136.3)
=======================================
Unrealized losses improved during the year ending December 31, 2003. As of
December 31, 2002, there were 86 securities, representing 40 credit exposures,
with an unrealized loss of $10 million or more with an amortized cost of
$2,660.0 million and unrealized loss of $825.7 million. The area of most concern
continues to be the airline sector and it represents 5 names on this list. All
of the above securities have undergone thorough analysis by our investment
professionals, and at this time we believe that the borrowers have the financial
capacity to make all required contractual payments on the notes when due, and we
intend to hold these securities until they either mature or recover in value.
Mortgage Loans. As of December 31, 2003 and 2002, the Company held
mortgage loans with carrying values of $12.9 billion and $11.8 billion,
including $3.0 billion and $2.6 billion respectively, of agricultural loans at
each period end and $9.9 billion and $9.2 billion, respectively, of commercial
loans. Impaired loans comprised 1.0% of the mortgage portfolio at December 31,
2003. The Company's average historical impaired loan percentage during the
period from 1998 through 2003 is 1.1%. This historical percentage is higher than
the current 1.0% because the historical percentage includes some remaining
problem assets of the 1990's real estate downturn, some of which are still held.
Maritime Life managed $2.0 billion and $1.5 billion of mortgage loans,
respectively, of which $1.1 billion and $0.7 billion, respectively, were
government-insured by the Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation.
96
JOHN HANCOCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
The following table shows the Company's agricultural mortgage loan portfolio by
its three major sectors: agri-business, timber and production agriculture.
As of December 31,
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2003 2002
---------------------------------------- -----------------------------------------
Amortized Carrying % of Total Amortized Carrying % of Total
Cost Value Carrying Value Cost Value Carrying Value
---------------------------------------- -----------------------------------------
(in millions) (in millions)
Agri-business............... $1,864.4 $1,864.0 61.5% $1,528.0 $1,522.0 57.8%
Timber...................... 1,174.6 1,146.5 37.8 1,091.5 1,087.8 41.3
Production agriculture...... 19.0 19.0 0.7 25.3 25.2 0.9
---------------------------------------- -----------------------------------------
Total................... $3,058.0 $3,029.5 100.0% $2,644.8 $2,635.0 100.0%
======================================== =========================================
The following table shows the distribution of our mortgage loan portfolio
by property type as of the dates indicated. Our commercial mortgage loan
portfolio consists primarily of non-recourse fixed-rate mortgages on existing,
well-leased commercial properties.
As of December 31,
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
2003 2002
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Carrying % of Carrying % of
Value Total Value Total
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
(in millions) (in millions)
Apartment.......................... $ 2,365.1 18.3% $ 2,063.4 17.5%
Office Buildings................... 2,711.5 21.0 2,974.6 25.2
Retail............................. 2,329.6 18.0 1,986.1 16.8
Agricultural....................... 3,029.4 23.4 2,635.0 22.3
Industrial......................... 1,180.4 9.1 1,085.8 9.2
Hotels............................. 473.2 3.7 481.1 4.1
Multi-Family....................... 27.2 0.2 40.4 0.3
Mixed Use.......................... 284.9 2.2 155.2 1.3
Other.............................. 534.7 4.1 384.1 3.3
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Total......................... $12,936.0 100.0% $ 11,805.7 100.0%
=======================================================================
97
JOHN HANCOCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
The following table shows the distribution of our mortgage loan portfolio
by geographical region, as defined by the American Council of Life Insurers
(ACLI).
Mortgage Loans - By ACLI Region
As of December 31,
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2003 2002
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Number Carrying % of Carrying % of
Of Loans Value Total Value Total
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(in millions) (in millions)
East North Central....... 142 $ 1,118.4 8.6% $ 1,102.0 9.3%
East South Central....... 39 412.2 3.2 430.9 3.6
Middle Atlantic.......... 120 1,449.5 11.2 1,447.4 12.3
Mountain................. 91 511.3 4.0 492.2 4.2
New England.............. 103 869.6 6.7 795.2 6.7
Pacific.................. 274 2,378.2 18.4 2,139.2 18.1
South Atlantic........... 202 2,378.3 18.4 2,230.2 18.9
West North Central....... 69 434.5 3.4 450.5 3.8
West South Central....... 120 1,024.1 7.9 954.3 8.1
Canada................... 12 2,359.9 18.2 1,763.8 15.0
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total............... 1,172 $12,936.0 100.0% $11,805.7 100.0%
===================================================================================
Mortgage Loan Comparisons
As of December 31,
---------------------------------------------------------------------
2003 2002
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Carrying % of Total Carrying % of Total
Value Mortgage Loans (1) Value Mortgage Loans (1)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
(in millions) (in millions)
Delinquent, not in foreclosure................ $ 2.6 0.0% $ 8.1 0.1%
Delinquent, in foreclosure (2)................ 92.7 0.7 44.4 0.4
Restructured.................................. 87.8 0.7 54.8 0.5
Loans foreclosed during period................ 23.9 0.2 26.0 0.2
--------------------------------- ----------------------------------
Subtotal................................... 207.0 1.6 133.3 1.2
All other loans with valuation
allowance.................................. 8.4 0.1 8.9 0.1
--------------------------------- ----------------------------------
Total..................................... $215.4 1.7% $142.2 1.3%
================================= ==================================
Valuation allowance........................... $ 66.2 $ 62.0
============== ===============
(1) As of December 31, 2003 and December 31, 2002 the Company held mortgage
loans with carrying values of $12.9 billion and $11.8 billion,
respectively.
(2) Increase as of December 31, 2003 is from a U.S. based forest products
company that filed for bankruptcy during 2003.
The valuation allowance is maintained at a level that is sufficient to
absorb estimated probable credit losses. Management's periodic evaluation of the
adequacy of the allowance for losses is based on past experience, known and
inherent risks, adverse situations that may affect the borrower's ability to
repay (including the timing of future payments), the estimated value of the
underlying security, the general composition of the portfolio, current economic
conditions and other factors. This evaluation is inherently subjective and is
susceptible to significant changes and no assurance can be given that the
allowances taken will in fact be adequate to cover all losses or that additional
valuation allowances or asset write-downs will not be required in the future.
The valuation allowance for the mortgage loan portfolio was $66.2 million, or
0.5 % of the carrying value of the portfolio as of December 31, 2003.
98
JOHN HANCOCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
Investment Results.
Net Investment Income. The following table summarizes the Company's
investment results for the periods indicated:
For the Years ended December 31,
--------------------------------------------------------------------
2003 2002 2001
Yield Amount Yield Amount Yield Amount
--------------------------------------------------------------------
(in millions) (in millions) (in millions)
General account assets-excluding policy
loans
Gross income.......................... 6.18% $ 4,297.2 6.63% $ 4,043.0 7.60% $ 4,069.4
Ending invested assets (1)-excluding
policy loans....................... 74,056.8 65,030.9 56,986.6
Policy loans
Gross income.......................... 6.12% 128.9 6.09% 125.1 6.23% 123.9
Ending assets......................... 2,117.9 2,097.2 2,008.2
--------- --------- ----------
Total gross income.................... 6.18% 4,426.1 6.61% 4,168.1 7.55% 4,193.3
Less: investment expenses............. (199.1) (234.0) (248.4)
Net investment income............... 5.90% $ 4,227.0 6.24% $ 3,934.1 7.09% $ 3,944.9
========= ========= ==========
(1) Cash and cash equivalents are included in invested assets in the table
above for the purposes of calculating yields on income producing assets
for the Company.
Year Ended December 31, 2003 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2002
Net investment income increased $292.9 million from the prior year. The
increase was primarily the result of asset growth and lower investment expenses.
Overall, the 2003 yield, net of investment expenses, on the general account
portfolio decreased to 5.90% from 6.24% in the prior year. The lower portfolio
yield was driven primarily by the drop in short-term interest rates during the
year, which impacts floating rate investments, and lower yields on investment
acquisitions. In summary, the change in yields was driven by the following
factors:
o As of December 31, 2003, the Company's asset portfolio had
approximately $13 billion of floating-rate exposure (primarily
LIBOR). This compares to $12 billion of exposure as of December 31,
2002. This exposure was created mostly through interest rate swaps
designed to match our floating-rate liability portfolio. As of
December 31, 2003, approximately 87% of this exposure, excluding
cash and short-term investments, was directly offset by exposure to
floating-rate liabilities. Most of the remaining 13% of exposure is
in floating rate assets acquired for their relative value and is
accounted for in the portfolio's interest rate risk management plan.
As a result of the drop in short term rates over the year, as well
as the increase in exposure, this floating-rate exposure reduced the
portfolio yield by 9 basis points in 2003 compared to the prior
year.
o Certain of our tax-preferenced investments (lease residual
management and affordable housing limited partnerships) dilute the
Company's net portfolio yield on a pre-tax basis. In 2003, this
dilutive effect was 8 basis points, compared to 10 basis points in
2002. However, adjusting for taxes, these investments increased the
Company's net income by $7.6 million in 2003 relative to 2002.
o The inflow of new cash for the twelve-month period ending December
31, 2003 was invested at rates that were below the portfolio rate.
In addition, maturing assets rolling over into new investments at
rates less favorable than those available in 2002. These two factors
account for the majority of the remaining decline in portfolio
rates.
Partially offsetting the effects of these decreases to yields on
investments was an increase in invested assets and a reduction in investment
expenses. In 2003, weighted-average invested assets grew $8,589.9 million, or
13.6%, from the prior year. In addition, investment expenses were reduced $34.9
million in 2003 compared to the prior year. Included are reductions in corporate
complex expenses and in depreciation expenses associated with the sale of the
Company's Home Office real estate of $44.9 million.
99
JOHN HANCOCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
Year Ended December 31, 2002 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2001
Net investment income decreased $10.8 million from 2001 to 2002. The
decrease was primarily the result of lower yields, partially offset by asset
growth and lower investment expenses. Overall, the 2002 yield, net of investment
expenses, on the general account portfolio decreased to 6.24 % from 7.09% in the
prior year. The lower portfolio yield was driven primarily by the sharp drop in
short-term interest rates during the year, which impacts floating rate
investments, and lower yields on investment acquisitions. The change in yields
was impacted by the following drivers:
o As of December 31, 2002, the Company's asset portfolio had
approximately $12 billion of floating-rate exposure (primarily
LIBOR). This exposure was created mostly through interest rate swaps
designed to match our floating-rate liability portfolio. As of
December 31, 2002, approximately 90% of this exposure, excluding
cash and short-term investments, was directly offset by exposure to
floating-rate liabilities. Most of the remaining 10% of exposure is
in floating rate assets acquired for their relative value and is
accounted for in the portfolio's interest rate risk management plan.
As a result of the drop in short term rates over the year, as well
as the increase in exposure, this floating-rate exposure reduced the
portfolio yield by 60 basis points in 2002 compared to the prior
year.
o Certain of our tax-preferenced investments (lease residual
management and affordable housing limited partnerships) dilute the
Company's net portfolio yield on a pre-tax basis. In 2002, this
dilutive effect was 10 basis points, compared to 8 basis points in
2001. However, adjusting for taxes, these investments increased the
Company's net income by $7.9 million in 2002 relative to 2001.
o Due to the late timing of the transaction, the previously described
acquisition of the Allmerica fixed universal life insurance business
in December 2002, resulted in a $0.5 billion invested asset
increase, which reduced 2002 net investment income yields by 3 basis
points. The assets related to the transaction were recorded on the
last day of the year. Consequently, no investment income was earned
by the Company in 2002 on these assets.
o The inflow of new cash for the twelve-month period ending December
31, 2002 was invested at rates that were below the portfolio rate.
In addition, maturing assets rolling over into new investments at
rates less favorable than those available in 2001 also contributed
to the decline in yields.
Partially offsetting the effects of these decreases to yields on
investments was an increase in invested assets and a reduction in investment
expenses. In 2002, weighted-average invested assets grew $7,453.2 million, or
13.4%, from the prior year. In addition, investment expenses were reduced $14.4
million in 2002 compared to the prior year. Also included are reductions in
corporate complex expenses and in depreciation expenses associated with the
planned sale of the Company's Home Office real estate.
100
JOHN HANCOCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
Net Realized Investment and Other Gain/(Loss). The following table shows
the Company's net realized investment and other gains (losses) by asset class
for the periods presented:
Net Realized
Investment
Gross Gain Gross Loss Hedging and Other
For the Year Ended December 31, 2002 Impairment on Disposal on Disposal Adjustments Gain/(Loss)
--------------------------------------------------------------------
(in millions)
Fixed maturity securities ...... $(521.4) $490.9 $(99.6) $ (248.9) $(379.0)
Equity securities .............. (28.1) 106.2 (7.0) -- 71.1
Mortgage loans on real estate .. -- 76.1 (41.0) (63.7) (28.6)
Real estate .................... -- 255.0 (19.2) -- 235.8
Other invested assets .......... (29.8) 26.0 (30.7) -- (34.5)
Derivatives .................... -- -- -- 117.7 117.7
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal ........ $(579.3) $954.2 $(197.5) $ (194.9) $ (17.5)
====================================================================
Amortization adjustment for deferred policy acquisition costs...................... (9.0)
Amounts credited to participating pension contractholders.......................... 1.6
Amounts credited to the policyholder dividend obligation........................... 58.5
------------
Total......................................................................... $ 33.6
============
(1) Fixed maturities gain on disposals includes $90.8 million of gains from
previously impaired securities.
(2) Fixed maturities loss on disposals includes $28.8 million of credit
related losses.
Net Realized
Investment
Gross Gain Gross Loss Hedging and Other
For the Year Ended December 31, 2002 Impairment on Disposal on Disposal Adjustments Gain/(Loss)
--------------------------------------------------------------------
(in millions)
Fixed maturity securities ...... $(582.5) $191.4 $(119.2) $(142.6) $(652.9)
Equity securities .............. (30.8) 153.9 (28.9) -- 94.2
Mortgage loans on real estate .. -- 55.8 (1.2) (35.9) 18.7
Real estate .................... -- 13.0 (39.0) -- (26.0)
Other invested assets .......... (61.9) 10.7 (13.0) -- (64.2)
Derivatives .................... -- 63.8 -- 41.9 105.7
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal ........ $(675.2) $488.6 $(201.3) $(136.6) $(524.5)
====================================================================
Amortization adjustment for deferred policy acquisition costs...................... 34.6
Amounts credited to participating pension contractholders.......................... 23.3
Amounts credited to the policyholder dividend obligation........................... 11.9
------------
Total......................................................................... $(454.7)
============
The hedging adjustments in the fixed maturities and mortgage loans asset
classes are non-cash adjustments representing the amortization or reversal of
prior fair value adjustments on assets in those classes that were or are
designated as hedged items in fair value hedge. When an asset or liability is so
designated, its cost basis is adjusted in response to movement in interest rate.
These adjustments are non-cash and reverse with the passage of time as the asset
or liability and derivative mature. The hedging adjustments on the derivatives
represent non-cash adjustments on derivative instruments and on assets and
liabilities designated as hedged items reflecting the change in fair value of
those items.
In 2003, net realized investment and other gains was a gain of $33.6
million compared to $454.7 million loss in 2002 and gross losses on impairments
and on disposal of investments - including bonds, equities, real estate,
mortgages and other invested assets was $776.8 million, excluding hedging
adjustments compared to $876.5 million in prior year.
In 2003, we realized $490.9 million of gains on disposal of fixed
maturities excluding hedging adjustments. These gains resulted from managing our
portfolios for tax optimization and ongoing portfolio management regarding our
targeted below investment grade assets, and included $62.0 million of
prepayments and approximately $90.8 million from recoveries on sales of
previously impaired securities.
In 2003, we realized $99.6 million of losses upon disposal of bonds
excluding hedging adjustments. We generally intend to hold securities in
unrealized loss positions until they mature or recover. However, we do sell
bonds under certain
101
JOHN HANCOCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
circumstances such as when new information causes us to
change our assessment of whether a bond will recover or perform according to its
contractual terms, in response to external events (such as a merger or a
downgrade) that result in investment guideline violations (such as single issuer
or overall portfolio credit quality limits), in response to extreme catastrophic
events (such as September 11, 2001) that result in industry or market wide
disruption, or to take advantage of tender offers. Sales generate both gains and
losses.
The Company has a process in place to identify securities that could
potentially have an impairment that is other than temporary. This process
involves monitoring market events that could impact issuers' credit ratings,
business climate, management changes, litigation and government actions, and
other similar factors. This process also involves monitoring late payments,
downgrades by rating agencies, key financial ratios, financial statements,
revenue forecasts and cash flow projections as indicators of credit issues.
At the end of each quarter, our Investment Review Committee reviews all
securities where market value is less than ninety percent of amortized cost for
three months or more to determine whether impairments need to be taken. This
committee includes the head of workouts, the head of each industry team, the
head of portfolio management, the Chief Investment Officer and the Corporate
Risk Officer who reports to the Chief Financial Officer. The analysis focuses on
each company's or project's ability to service its debts in a timely fashion and
the length of time the security has been trading below cost. The results of this
analysis are audited by our external auditors and reviewed by the Life Company's
Committee of Finance, a subcommittee of the Life Company's Board of Directors,
quarterly. This quarterly process includes a fresh assessment of the credit
quality of each investment in the entire fixed maturities portfolio.
The Company considers relevant facts and circumstances in evaluating
whether the impairment of a security is other than temporary. Relevant facts and
circumstances considered include (1) the length of time the fair value has been
below cost; (2) the financial position of the issuer, including the current and
future impact of any specific events; and (3) the Company's ability and intent
to hold the security to maturity or until it recovers in value. To the extent
the Company determines that a security is deemed to be other than temporarily
impaired, the difference between amortized cost and fair value would be charged
to earnings.
There are a number of significant risks and uncertainties inherent in the
process of monitoring impairments and determining if an impairment is other than
temporary. These risks and uncertainties include (1) the risk that our
assessment of an issuer's ability to meet all of its contractual obligations
will change based on changes in the credit characteristics of that issuer, (2)
the risk that the economic outlook will be worse than expected or have more of
an impact on the issuer than anticipated, (3) information, or fraudulent
financial statements, could be provided to our investment professionals who
determine the fair value estimates and other than temporary impairments, and (4)
the risk that new information obtained by us or changes in other facts and
circumstances lead us to change our intent to hold the security to maturity or
until it recovers in value. Any of these situations could result in a charge to
earnings in a future period.
As disclosed in our discussion of the Results of Operations in this MD&A,
the Company recorded losses due to other than temporary impairments of fixed
maturity securities for the year 2003 of $546.1 million (including impairment
losses of $521.4 million, and $24.7 million of previously recognized gains where
the bond was part of a hedging relationship). The following list shows the
largest losses recognized year to date, the related circumstances giving rise to
the loss and a discussion of how those circumstances impacted other material
investments held. Unless noted otherwise, all of the items shown are impairments
of securities held at December 31, 2003, including hedging adjustments.
o $115.3 million on public and private fixed maturity securities
(including an impairment loss of $114.8 million and $0.5 million in
previously recognized gains where the bonds were part of a hedging
relationship) on an international dairy company headquartered in
Italy. The company filed for bankruptcy in December 2003 after 4
billion euros of liquid investments was declared non-existent by a
major U.S. financial institution. The current carrying value of the
securities is $25.3 million with most of our holdings written down
to a year-end quoted value of 15 cents on the dollar. A $6.2 million
position is at an operating subsidiary with substantial assets and
hence was written down to 63 cents on the dollar. We are not aware
of any other investments that will be affected by this bankruptcy.
o $37.7 million (including an impairment loss of $37.3 million and
$0.4 million in previously recognized gains where the bonds were
part of a hedging relationship) on public fixed maturity securities
relating to a large, national farmer-owned dairy co-operative.
Margins have been squeezed due to a supply/demand imbalance, high
input costs and high leverage, due in part to a recent acquisition.
Despite a large favorable outcome on a lawsuit, depressed commodity
prices in this environment have continued to put pressure on the
company to rationalize their operations as was evident in their
recently released annual financial statements. Given our
subordinated position in the capital
102
JOHN HANCOCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
structure, and unlikely improvement near term, we have impaired the
security to the market level. We have no other loans to dairy
companies that are impacted by this same combination of factors. We
have recovered $10.7 million on subsequent sales of this security.
o $36.8 million on private fixed maturity securities (including an
impairment loss of $31.7 million and $5.1 million in previously
recognized gains where the bond was part of a hedging relationship)
on a toll road where a new competing road has decreased the traffic
on the toll road and hence the project has been unable to service
its debt. We have no other holdings affected by this situation.
o $36.1 million on private and public fixed maturity securities
(including an impairment loss of $34.6 million and $1.5 million in
previously recognized gains where the bond was part of a hedging
relationship) secured by aircraft leased by a large U.S. airline.
This airline is seeking to reduce its lease rates as a small part of
its larger efforts to reduce costs and emerge from bankruptcy. These
impairments are based on public quoted prices for the public
securities and the appraised values of the aircraft in conjunction
with the expected restructured lease rates on the private
securities. While we hold other investments in the aircraft
industry, these circumstances are unique to this issuer.
o $29.8 million on private fixed maturity securities relating to an
Australian mining company. The company filed the equivalent of
Chapter 11 due to weaker commodity prices, operational difficulties,
and losses on currency transactions. Attempts to sell assets at
prices sufficient to pay our debt have not been successful. As a
result, the investment has been written off entirely. While lower
commodity prices affect a broad range of credits, the unique
circumstances of this company are not present in our other
investments.
o $27.3 million on public fixed maturity securities relating to a
large North American transportation provider to a variety of
industries that has struggled to emerge from bankruptcy due to
litigation with a subsidiary, tax claims by the U.S. Internal
Revenue Service, and most recently, a claim by a regulatory agency.
We had further impaired the security and the reorganization out of
bankruptcy has occurred. These circumstances are unique to this
issuer. We have recovered $26.4 million on subsequent sales of this
security.
o $26.3 million (including an impairment loss of $23.2 million and
$3.1 million in previously recognized gains where the bonds were
part of a hedging relationship) on public fixed maturity securities
relating to a special purpose company created to sublease aircraft
to two major U.S. airlines. This investment is the subordinated
tranche in a multi-tier structure of an Enhanced Equipment Trust
Certificate (EETC). One of the airlines has recently indicated that
it will not honor the original lease rates on the aircraft in this
investment. Hence, with the loan exceeding the current value of the
securities, we have impaired the security to the market level. While
we do have an investment in the senior tranche of this EETC, the
senior tranche exposure is still less than the current market value
of the underlying planes and the senior tranche enjoys an 18 month
liquidity facility. Accordingly, we do not anticipate a loss on the
senior tranche.
o $25.2 million on private fixed maturities of a holding company
structure created to develop three natural gas fired power projects
in the southwestern United States that were initiated to respond to
the California power crisis. The subsequent drop in power demand and
prices made this company's business plan uneconomic. Negotiations
with the company to restructure the debt and create a stronger
entity have lead to further impairments in our security. We have one
other $50 million loan to a power company that similarly began
construction on a new plant to sell power into California. It has
successfully redeployed its turbines elsewhere and we do not expect
a loss on that position.
o $21.6 million (including an impairment loss of $19.2 million and
$2.4 million in previously recognized gains where the bond was part
of a hedging relationship) on public fixed maturity securities
relating to an asset backed pool of franchise loans primarily
focused in the gas/convenience store sector. The sector has
continued to be hit hard by higher delinquencies and lower
recoveries on the underlying loans. Modeling under EITF 99-20 with
higher delinquencies and lower recovery values has led to further
impairments on these securities. We have $134.8 million of other
exposure to franchise loan ABS, all of which are senior tranches.
o $14.2 million on public fixed maturity securities relating to a
subordinated holding company structure comprised of ownership
interests in three power generation facilities in the western U.S.
Due to the severe overcapacity in the power markets and the lack of
an off take provider for the potential power generated from the
plants, this subordinated interest in the facilities was not
refinanced and we wrote off the investment completely. The
overcapacity in the power markets has put stress on all power
producers as we discuss in our sector commentary.
103
JOHN HANCOCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
o $11.1 million on private fixed maturity securities on a Chilean
based conglomerate. Attempts to renegotiate the agreement have not
materialized and the likelihood of receiving any recovery is remote.
We have completely written off the investment. The circumstances
surrounding this investment are unique as the borrower has
demonstrated a lack of willingness to repay the debt on this
investment.
o $11.0 million on public fixed maturity securities (including an
impairment loss of $9.2 million and $1.8 million in previously
recognized gains where the bond was part of a hedging relationship)
of a utility brought into the bankruptcy of its parent that suffered
from a significant amount of merchant energy exposure. Our bonds are
secured by a pump storage facility. We have $55.2 million carrying
value of bonds at the parent that were already impaired in a prior
quarter.
o $11.0 million on private fixed maturity securities secured by
aircraft leased by a large U.S. airline. This airline is seeking to
reduce its lease rates as a small part of its larger efforts to
reduce costs to avoid bankruptcy. This impairment is based on the
expected reduction in the lease rates. We have $72.5 million of
other ETC's backed by leases to this airline. The airline has not
requested a change in the lease rates on the aircraft backing these
investments. While we hold other investments in the airline industry
and the industry has been under extreme pressure as discussed above,
these issues are unique to this borrower.
o $9.7 million on public fixed maturity securities relating to a
manufacturer of composite and building materials. This company has
struggled to emerge from bankruptcy due to numerous lawsuits and a
disagreement between the banks and noteholders. Accordingly, the
price of these securities has declined and we are further impairing
them down to current market levels. These circumstances are unique
to this issuer.
o $9.6 million on public fixed maturity securities relating to an
unregulated power and pipeline energy company that became insolvent
due to a fall in profitability in its merchant energy business
downgrades from the rating agencies and a lack of liquidity due to
the call on cash collateral requirements after the downgrades. We
have impaired the security to market levels. The overcapacity in the
power markets have put stress on all power producers as discussed
above.
o $9.4 million on public fixed maturity securities relating to a
special purpose financing company which owns an interest in a gas
fired power plant in the UK with long-term fixed price contracts
that are significantly above market in today's depressed pricing
environment. In early 2003, the banks decided to pursue a fire sale
of the power plant. We have impaired this loan to the discounted
value of our likely recovery from such a sale. We have two other
loans with a total carrying value of $103.8 million to companies
participating in the UK power market. $63.9 million is backed by a
UK pump storage facility investment where debt service coverage has
been reduced by the weak environment for power in the U.K., but we
continue to anticipate positive debt service coverage for this
investment. $39.9 million is a loan to the owner of a UK regional
electric company. Regional electric companies have monopolies to
distribute and supply power to their regions and, as a result, are
less affected by the over supply of power.
Of the $99.6 million of realized losses on sales of fixed maturity
securities for the year 2003, $28.8 million was credit related and $50.3 million
arose from the sale of 16 securities with $1.0 million or more of realized loss.
The only significant realized losses for 2003 were $16.7 million on the sale of
the bonds of a major healthcare service provider (late in the first quarter, the
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission announced that they had discovered
massive accounting fraud at that company and thus its bond and stock prices
plummeted; due to this significant event and the uncertainty over the future of
the company due to the ongoing U.S. SEC investigation, we sold our position in
the first quarter of 2003), and $4.9 million on the sale of bonds of a power
provider with a large exposure to the merchant energy markets. As we became more
concerned that the banks would not renew their bank lines to this company, we
sold most of our position and impaired the remaining position that was
subsequently sold in early July. These were the only sales of significance that
we consider credit losses, (i.e. sold at less than 80% of amortized cost). All
other sales were related to general portfolio management, including the sale of
a number of below investment grade bonds to maintain our exposure below 10% of
invested assets on a statutory basis. The following are the losses on sales over
$1.0 million:
o $16.7 million credit loss on the sale of public bonds of a major
healthcare service provider as referred to above.
o $5.5 million on the sale of public bonds of a utility holding
company where our position exceeded our single credit limits due to
a downgrade of the company. This sale brought our holdings of this
company in compliance within our limits.
104
JOHN HANCOCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
o $4.9 million credit loss on the sale of public bonds of a power
provider referred to above.
o $3.1 million on the sale of public bonds of an oil and gas company's
bonds. This position was sold to reduce its below investment grade
exposure.
o $2.9 million credit loss on the sale of public bonds of a merchant
energy producer. When this company announced it had broken off talks
with its banks on a line coming due in the next month, we sold these
bonds.
o $2.3 million on the sale of the senior tranche of a commercial
mortgage backed security. The loss is due to a rise in interest
rates since the time of purchase.
o $2.2 million on the sale of public bonds of an oil and gas pipeline
company in order to maintain our below investment grade holdings
below 10% of invested assets on a statutory basis.
o $2.1 million on the sale of public bonds of an unregulated power
generating company. This bond was sold after a downgrade created a
credit limit violation.
o $2.1 million on the sale of public bonds of a large U.S. based bank.
The loss was entirely due to a rise in Treasury rates since the time
of purchase.
o $1.8 million on the sale of public bonds of an oil and gas
exploration and production company. The loss is due to a rise in
interest rates since the time of purchase.
o $1.4 million credit loss on the sale of MBS/CMO of an aircraft lease
trust. This loss was due to a downgrade by the rating agencies,
which led to a supply/demand imbalance. .
o $1.2 million on the sale of bonds of a public power provider with
merchant exposure due to our concern over whether the banks would
renew their lines.
o $1.1 million on the sale of public bonds of a gas pipeline company.
The loss is due to a rise in interest rates since the time of
purchase.
o $1.0 million on the sale of public bonds of another power provider
with a significant exposure to the merchant energy markets and our
concern over their ability to renew their bank lines.
o $1.0 million on the sale of public bonds of a large, European
telecom company. The loss is due to a rise in interest rates since
the time of purchase.
o $1.0 million on the sale of public bonds of a large, domestic
telecom company. The loss is due to a rise in interest rates since
the time of purchase.
There were no other sales with losses more than $1 million and no other
sales of bonds at less than 80% of amortized cost, which we would consider as
credit losses. These sales helped reduce our below investment grade holdings and
accomplished other portfolio objectives.
The Company recorded losses due to other than temporary impairments of CDO
equity and other invested assets of $29.8 million for the year 2003. Equity in
these CDO's take the first loss risk in a pool of high yield debt and hence
under perform in a high yield default environment. These impairments were
recognized using the guidance in EITF 99-20. We have a total remaining carrying
value of $60.0 million and $48.7 million of CDO equity as of December 31, 2003
and December 31, 2002, respectively, which is currently supported by expected
cash flows.
The Company also recognized losses on other than temporary impairments of
common stock of $28.1 million for the year 2003, as the result of market values
falling below cost by greater than 15% for more than six months.
105
JOHN HANCOCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
The Company recorded a net loss of $28.6 million on mortgage loans for the
year 2003 (of which $63.7 million were losses on hedging adjustments). Included
are losses of $29.7 million for the year 2003, associated with losses on
agriculture mortgages.
There were also gains of $106.2 million on the sale of equity securities
as part of our overall investment strategy of using equity gains to minimize
credit losses in the long term, gains of $26.0 million from the sale of other
invested assets, and gains of $255.0 million resulting from the sale of real
estate for the year 2003. Net derivative activity resulted in a gain of $117.7
million on $39.6 billion of derivative notional for the year 2003 as interest
rates increase approximately 45 basis points on swap curve. Because of the
fundamental strategy of the Company's derivative usage is designed to
neutralized interest rate risk, certain components of the derivative's fair
value change are not offset in earnings. For the year 2002, net realized
investment and other losses were $454.7 million. Gross losses on impairments and
on disposal of investments - including bonds, equities, mortgages, real estate,
and other invested assets were $876.5 million, excluding hedging adjustments.
The Company recorded losses due to other than temporary impairments of
fixed maturities of $582.5 million for the year 2002, excluding hedging
adjustments. The primary other than temporary impairments on fixed maturities
for the year ended December 31, 2002 were:
o $113.2 million on fixed maturity securities relating to a national
airline that faced heavy operating losses due to the economic
downturn, a high cost structure, and competition from low-cost
carriers.
o $56.1 million on a large energy company that filed for bankruptcy in
late 2001.
o $48.0 million on secured financings backed by an airline, or its
subsidiaries, that filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection during
the third quarter of 2002.
o $45.5 million on securities issued by the holding company of a large
domestic power producer that was downgraded to below investment
grade status in July 2002 due to liquidity concerns.
o $35.3 million on issuers affiliated with the Argentina government
and other investments in that country
o $33.8 million on securities issued by a large telecommunications
company that filed for bankruptcy in July, 2002.
o $33.5 million on fixed maturity securities for an unregulated power
and pipeline energy company.
o $31.6 million of fixed maturity investments of U.K. based projects
providing power and other essential services to an industrial
complex.
o $28.3 million on fixed maturity securities relating to an oil field
service company.
o $24.8 million on a redeemable preferred stock of a large domestic
farm cooperative due to the cyclical nature of the business and a
heavy debt load.
o $19.2 million on redeemable preferred stock of a technology based
manufacturer of engineering products with a tight liquidity
position.
o $19.0 million on securities of an Australian power project that
failed to produce benefits expected from the deregulation of that
country's power industry.
o $16.9 million on securities issued by a Mexican producer of
corrugated boxes and newsprint.
o $13.6 million on securities of a diversified producer of single-use,
specialty medical products.
o $9.9 million on subordinated private placement securities funding a
toll road between the U.S. and Mexico.
Write-downs of CBO/CDO fixed maturity investments and other invested assets were
$61.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2002.
106
JOHN HANCOCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Liquidity describes the ability of a company to generate sufficient cash
flows to meet the immediate needs to facilitate business operations. John
Hancock Financial Services, Inc. (the Company) is an insurance holding company.
The assets of the Company consist primarily of the outstanding capital stock of
the Life Company, John Hancock Canadian Holdings Limited (Maritime Life's
parent) and investments in other subsidiaries both domestic and international.
The Company's cash flow primarily consists of dividends from its operating
subsidiaries and proceeds from the Company's debt offerings (see Note 7--Debt
and Line of Credit) offset by expenses, shareholder dividends and stock
repurchases. As a holding company, the Company's ability to meet its cash
requirements, including, but not limited to, paying interest on any debt, paying
expenses related to its affairs, paying dividends on its common stock and
repurchasing the Company's common stock pursuant to the board of director's
approved plan, substantially depends upon dividends from its operating
subsidiaries.
Primary Operating Subsidiaries
The Company's primary insurance operations are those of the Life Company
and Maritime Life. State insurance laws generally restrict the ability of
insurance companies to pay cash dividends in excess of prescribed limitations
without prior approval. The Life Company's limit is the greater of 10% of the
statutory surplus or the prior calendar year's statutory net gain from
operations of the Life Company. The ability of the Life Company, JHFS' primary
operating subsidiary, to pay shareholder dividends is and will continue to be
subject to restrictions set forth in the insurance laws and regulations of
Massachusetts, its domiciliary state. The Massachusetts insurance law limits how
and when the Life Company can pay shareholder dividends. The Life Company, in
the future, could also be viewed as being commercially domiciled in New York. If
so, dividend payments may also be subject to New York's holding company act as
well as Massachusetts law. JHFS currently does not expect such regulatory
requirements to impair its ability to meet its liquidity and capital needs.
However, JHFS can give no assurance it will declare or pay dividends on a
regular basis.
In May, August and December of 2003, the Commissioner of Insurance for the
Commonwealth of Massachusetts approved dividends to JHFS in the amount of $100.0
million, $14.5 million and $100.0 million, respectively. None of these dividends
was classified as extraordinary by state regulators. The Life Company paid
$100.0 million in cash in 2003, transferred property worth $14.5 million in
August 2003 and the final $100.0 million in cash in January 2004. Funds from the
dividends, together with the net proceeds from operations of the Company were
principally used to pay $101.3 million in dividends to JHFS common shareholders.
JHFS paid a dividend on its common stock of $0.35 per share on December 11, 2003
to shareholders of record as of November 18, 2003.
Canadian insurance laws generally restrict the ability of insurance
companies to pay cash dividends in excess of prescribed limitations without
prior approval. Maritime Life, our Canadian life insurance subsidiary, is
subject to restrictions on dividend payments to its holding company, John
Hancock Canadian Holdings, Ltd, by Canadian regulators. Maritime Life may not
make dividend payments which would make its minimum continuing capital and
surplus ratio fall below 150%, as required by the Office of the Superintendent
of Financial Institutions. Maritime Life's minimum continuing capital and
surplus ratio is measured annually, and was 185% as of December 31, 2003. The
Company did not request any dividend payment from Maritime Life in 2003, nor did
Maritime Life make any dividend payments to JHFS or its operating subsidiaries
in 2003.
Sources of cash for the Company's insurance subsidiaries are from
premiums, deposits and charges on policies and contracts, investment income,
maturing investments, and proceeds from sales of investment assets. Our
liquidity requirements relate principally to the liabilities associated with
various insurance, annuity, and structured investment products, and to the
funding of investments in new products, processes, and technology and general
operating expenses. Product liabilities include the payment of benefits under
insurance, annuity and structured investment products and the payment of policy
surrenders, withdrawals and policy loans. The Company periodically adjusts its
investment policy to respond to changes in short-term and long-term cash
requirements and provide adequate funds to pay benefits without forced sales of
investments.
As noted above, on September 28, 2003, JHFS entered into a definitive
merger agreement with Manulife. Until the closing of the transaction, the
Company will continue to operate independently and does not expect the proposed
merger to have a negative impact on financial condition, liquidity or sales.
Following the announcement of the proposed merger, Standard and Poor's, Moody's,
A.M. Best and Fitch affirmed all ratings. In addition, Standard & Poor's noted
that "the `A' long-term counterparty credit and senior debt ratings on John
Hancock Financial Services Inc., a holding company for its U.S. and Canadian
operating insurance companies, have been placed on CreditWatch with positive
implications." Dominion Bond Rating Service placed John Hancock Financial
Services' corporate rating of A (high) and Maritime Life's long-term
107
JOHN HANCOCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
ratings "Under Review - Positive" and Maritime Life's financial strength ratings
were placed on "Credit Watch Positive" by Moody's and A.M. Best.
The liquidity of our insurance operations is also related to the overall
quality of our investments. As of December 31, 2003, $46,635.4 million, or 88.3%
of the consolidated fixed maturity securities held by us and rated by Standard &
Poor's Ratings Services, a division of the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. (S&P) or
the National Association of Insurance Commissioners were rated investment grade
(BBB- or higher by S&P, Baa3 or higher for Moody's, or 1 or 2 by the National
Association of Insurance Commissioners). The remaining $6,186.1 million, or
11.7% of fixed maturity investments, were rated non-investment grade. $41,258.2
million, or 87.1% of the Life Company fixed maturity securities held by us and
rated by Standard & Poor's Ratings Services (S&P) or the National Association of
Insurance Commissioners were rated investment grade (BBB- or higher by S&P, Baa3
or higher for Moody's, or 1 or 2 by the National Association of Insurance
Commissioners). The remaining $6,112.3 million, or 12.9% of the Life Company
fixed maturity investments, were rated non-investment grade. And $4,472.9
million, or 99.3% of the Maritime Life fixed maturity securities held by us and
rated by Standard & Poor's Ratings Services, a division of the McGraw-Hill
Companies, Inc. (S&P) or the National Association of Insurance Commissioners
were rated investment grade (BBB- or higher by S&P, Baa3 or higher for Moody's,
or 1 or 2 by the National Association of Insurance Commissioners). The remaining
$30.9 million, or 0.7% of the Maritime Life fixed maturity investments, were
rated non-investment grade. For additional discussion of our investment
portfolio see the General Account Investments section of this Management's
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Segment
Operations.
We employ an asset/liability management approach tailored to the specific
requirements of each of our product lines. Each product line has an investment
strategy based on the specific characteristics of the liabilities in the product
line. As part of this approach, we develop investment policies and operating
guidelines for each portfolio based upon the return objectives, risk tolerance,
liquidity, and tax and regulatory requirements of the underlying products and
business segments.
Insurance Company Customer Accounts
A primary liquidity concern with respect to life insurance and annuity
products is the risk of early policyholder and contractholder withdrawal. The
following table summarizes our annuity policy reserves and deposit fund
liabilities for the contractholder's ability to withdraw funds for the indicated
periods:
As of December 31,
------------------------------------------------
2003 2002
------------------------------------------------
Amount % Amount %
------------------------------------------------
(in millions)
Not subject to discretionary withdrawal provisions....................... $ 28,961.0 55.2% $ 29,409.0 58.8%
Subject to discretionary withdrawal adjustment:
With market value adjustment............................................. 2,109.7 4.0 1,409.6 2.8
At contract value........................................................ 2,926.6 5.6 2,542.1 5.1
At fair value/ market value.............................................. 11,195.0 21.4 10,972.4 21.9
Subject to discretionary withdrawal at contract value
less surrender charge.............................................. 7,219.3 13.8 5,726.2 11.4
------------------------------------------------
Total annuity reserves and deposit funds liability....................... $ 52,411.6 100.0 $ 50,059.3 100.0%
================================================
Individual life insurance policies are less susceptible to withdrawal than
are individual annuity contracts because policyholders may incur surrender
charges and undergo a new underwriting process in order to obtain a new
insurance policy. Annuity benefits under group annuity contracts are generally
not subject to early withdrawal. As indicated in the table above, there are a
substantial percentage of annuity reserves and deposit fund liabilities that are
not subject to withdrawal. As a matter of policy, we seek to include provisions
limiting withdrawal rights from general account institutional structured
investment products. These include GICs and funding agreements sold to plan
sponsors where the contract prohibits the contractholder from making any
withdrawals, whether at book value or at market value, other than on a scheduled
maturity date. In addition, none of these obligations can be accelerated based
on any change in the Company's credit rating. The Company does not sell
contracts with put provisions.
Individual life insurance policies (other than term life insurance)
increase in cash value over their lives. Policyholders have the right to borrow
from us an amount generally up to the cash value of their policy at any time. As
of December 31, 2003, we had approximately $22.6 billion in cash values in which
policyholders have rights to policy loans. The majority of cash values eligible
for policy loans are at variable interest rates, which are reset annually on the
policy anniversary. Moreover, a portion of our fixed interest rate policy loans
have features that provide for reduced
108
JOHN HANCOCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
crediting rates on the portion of cash values loaned. The amount of policy loans
has remained consistent over the past three years, at approximately $2.1
billion, $1.6 billion of which are in the closed block at December 31, 2003.
The Company's primary operating subsidiary is John Hancock Life Insurance
Company. The risk-based capital standards for life insurance companies, as
prescribed by the National Association of Insurance Commissioners, establish a
risk-based capital ratio comparing adjusted surplus to required surplus for each
of our United States domiciled insurance subsidiaries. If the risk-based capital
ratio falls outside of acceptable ranges, regulatory action may be taken ranging
from increased information requirements to mandatory control by the domiciliary
insurance department. The risk-based capital ratios of all our insurance
subsidiaries as of December 31, 2003, were above the ranges that would require
regulatory action.
We maintain reinsurance programs designed to protect against large or
unusual losses. Based on our periodic review of our reinsurers' financial
statements, financial strength ratings and reputations in the reinsurance
marketplace, we believe that our reinsurers are financially sound, and,
therefore, that we have no significant exposure to uncollectible reinsurance in
excess of uncollectible amounts recognized in our consolidated financial
statements.
Analysis of Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
Net cash provided by operating activities was $3,052.7 million, $2,561.1
million and $2,633.8 million, for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and
2001, respectively. Cash flows from operating activities are affected by the
timing of premiums received, fees received and investment income. The $491.6
million increase in 2003 compared to 2002 resulted primarily a $677.4 million
increase in premiums received, and a $239.4 million increase in net investment
income received offset by a $281.8 million increase in expenses and a $329.8
million increase in income taxes paid. The $72.7 million decrease in 2002
compared to 2001 resulted primarily from a $422.5 million decrease in premiums
received and a $130.5 million increase in expenses, offset by a $153.5 million
decrease in benefits paid, a $143.3 million increase in net investment income
received.
Certain operating payments:
o The Company made certain payments which related to the rent of its
Home Office properties since the sale of these properties effective
March 14, 2003. The Company has signed several market-based leases
for use of the Home Office properties ranging from 5 to 15 years.
o The Company's defined-benefit retiree pension plan has not required
funding since 1991, related post retirement benefits plans received
funding of $32.3 million, $21.6 million and $20.6 million for each
years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001 respectively. Prior to
2002, pension benefits under the non-Maritime Life defined benefit
plans were also based on years of service and final average
compensation (generally during the three years prior to retirement).
In 2001, the defined benefit pension plans were amended to a cash
balance basis under which benefits are based on career average
compensation. Under grandfathering rules, employees within 5 years
of early retirement eligibility or employees over age 40 and with at
least 10 years of service will receive pension benefits based on the
greater of the benefit from the cash balance basis or the prior
final average salary basis. This amendment became effective on
January 1, 2002.
o For the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002, and 2001 the Company
paid $11.5 million, $15.1 million and $12.1 million to fund its
commitments under its cash balance pension plans and 401K employee
savings plans.
o The Company has paid $96.2 million, $89.6 million, and $65.3 million
for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001 for interest on
its debt.
o The Company has paid $177.2 million, $65.2 million, and $1.7 million
for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001 for income
taxes.
Net cash used in investing activities was $3,649.6 million, $6,714.1
million and $6,782.9 million for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and
2001 respectively. Changes in the cash provided by investing activities
primarily relate to the management of the Company's investment portfolios and
the investment of excess cash generated by operating and financing activities.
Cash flows from investing activities include those from the purchase or sales of
product lines and asset management such as the sale of the Home Office
properties in 2003. In addition to a comprehensive asset-liability management
program that seeks to align the financial and risk attributes of the Company's
investment portfolio (including cash and short term investments) with those of
its liability contracts, we also maintain a minimum cash balance and monitors
available liquidity against estimated liability needs under stressed market
conditions. All of this leads to a liquidity policy we think is prudent and is
expected to amply support liability needs even in these most stressed
environments. The $3,064.5 million decrease in cash used in 2003 as compared to
2002 resulted primarily from an $887.6 million cash inflow from the sale of Home
Office properties in the first quarter of 2003 and a $2,204.9 million reduction
in net acquisitions of fixed maturities during the year ended December 31, 2003
as compared to prior year. The decrease in net cash used in 2002 as compared to
2001 resulted from a $12.8 billion decrease in acquisitions of fixed maturities
109
JOHN HANCOCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
offset by an $11.4 billion decrease in sales, maturities and redemptions of
fixed maturity securities in 2002 compared to the prior year. The decrease was
offset by increased net purchases of mortgages and short-term investment over
prior year.
Net cash provided by financing activities was $2,527.9 million, $4,029.9
million and $2,182.8 million for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and
2001, respectively. Changes in cash provided by financing activities primarily
relate to the execution of transactions with our customers demonstrated by
deposits and withdrawals under investment-type contracts and the payment of the
Company's annual dividend to shareholders. In addition, where advantageous or
otherwise necessary, the Company may issue equity securities or debt, borrowing
or re-pay corporate debt, acquire our stock on the market, or pay dividends to
shareholders. The $1,502.0 million decrease in the 2003 as compared to 2002
resulted from a $1,453.0 million decrease in deposits and a $1,492.2 million
increase in cash payments made on withdrawals of universal life insurance and
investment-type contracts offset somewhat by $970.0 million in funds from the
Consumer Notes program initiated in the second half of 2002, and a $373.2
million decline in treasury stock acquired due to the suspension of activity
under the stock repurchase program. Deposits on universal life insurance and
investment-type contracts exceeded withdrawals by $969.5 million and $3,914.7
million for the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively. The
Company's ability to generate customer deposits in excess of withdrawals is
critical to our long-term growth. The increase in 2002 as compared to 2001
resulted from a $1,589.9 million increase in deposits net of cash payments made
on withdrawals of universal life insurance and investment-type contracts.
Deposits on such universal life insurance and investment-type contracts exceeded
withdrawals by $3,914.7 million and $2,324.8 million for the years ended
December 31, 2002 and December 31, 2001, respectively. The Company's
acquisitions of treasury stock decreased to $385.0 million in 2002 as compared
to $580.4 million in 2001.
On October 26, 2000, the Company announced that its Board of Directors
authorized a stock repurchase program, with no termination date, under which the
Company was authorized to purchase up to $500 million of its outstanding common
stock. On August 6, 2001, the Company's board of directors authorized a $500
million increase to the stock repurchase program. On June 21, 2002, the
Company's board of directors authorized a second increase of $500 million to the
stock repurchase program, bringing the total amount authorized to be used to
repurchase Company stock to $1.5 billion. Under the stock repurchase program,
purchases have been and will be, made from time to time, depending on market
conditions, business opportunities and other factors, in the open market or
through privately negotiated transactions. Through December 31, 2003, the
Company has repurchased 30.0 million shares with a total cost of $1,057.2
million, of which 0.5 million shares were repurchased in 2003 at a cost of $11.8
million. The 2003 repurchase activity consisted primarily of the acquisition of
certain restricted stock from key executives of the Company. The proceeds from
some of these purchases were used by the executives to repay loans under a
discontinued stock ownership and loan program and taxes. The outstanding loans
under that program, which were grandfathered under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, have been repaid in full at the request of the Company's Board of
Directors. At December 31, 2003, the Company was not actively repurchasing its
common stock but will continue to assess when it might resume repurchases of its
common stock under the stock repurchase program.
Lines of Credit, Debt and Guarantees
Cash flow requirements are also supported by a committed line of credit of
$1.0 billion, through a syndication of banks including Fleet National Bank,
JPMorgan Chase, Citicorp USA, Inc., The Bank of New York, The Bank of Nova
Scotia, Fleet Securities, Inc. and JPMorgan Securities, Inc., and an effective
shelf registration statement which initially provided for the issuance, from
time to time, of up to $1 billion of the Company's debt and equity securities.
The line of credit agreement provides for two facilities: one for $500 million
pursuant to a 364-day commitment (renewed effective July 25, 2003) and a second
multi-year facility for $500 million (renewable in 2005). The line of credit is
available for general corporate purposes. The line of credit agreement has no
material adverse change clause, and includes, among others, the following
covenants: minimum requirements for JHFS shareholder's equity, maximum limit on
the capitalization ratio and a negative pledge clause (with exceptions) as well
as limitations on subsidiary debt. The line of credit also contains
cross-acceleration provisions. The fee structure is determined by the rating
levels of JHFS or the Life Company such that a downgrade would result in higher
fees. To date, we have not borrowed any amounts under the line of credit. On
November 29, 2001, JHFS sold, under the $1.0 billion shelf registration
statement, $500.0 million in 7-year senior unsecured notes at a coupon of 5.625%
with the proceeds used for general corporate purposes. Covenants contained in
this issue include, among others, limitations on the disposition of and liens on
the stock of the Life Company. This issue also contains cross-acceleration
provisions. The remaining capacity of the shelf registration is currently $500.0
million.
As of December 31, 2003, we had $1,895.3 million of principal and interest
amounts of debt outstanding consisting of $499.0 million of medium-term bonds,
$447.6 million of surplus notes, $304.7 million of Canadian debt, $46.8 million
of other notes payable (excluding $121.3 million in non-recourse debt for
Signature Fruit and a Signature Funding CDO) and $381.3 million in commercial
paper. Also not included here is the $94.5 million SFAS No. 133 fair value
adjustment to interest rate swaps held for the Surplus Notes. During 2003, the
Company issued in aggregate $2.3 billion in commercial
110
JOHN HANCOCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
paper, of which $381.3 million was outstanding at December 31, 2003. The
commercial paper program established at the Company has replaced the commercial
paper program at its indirect subsidiary, John Hancock Capital Corporation. In
addition, the Company has outstanding $1,550.4 million of consumer notes which
are redeemable upon the death of the holder, subject to an annual overall
program redemption limitation of 1% of the aggregate securities outstanding, or
an individual redemption limitation of $200,000 of aggregate principal, and
mature at a various dates in the future. Covenants in this program include,
among others, limitations on liens.
$150 million in letters of credit for JH Reassurance Company, guaranteed
by the Company, are subject to rating triggers that require the posting of
deposits (within three business days) as additional collateral if the ratings of
JHFS or the Life Company fall below designated rating levels. Currently, JHFS
and the Life Company's ratings are several levels away from a triggering event
for the guaranteed letters of credit. Failure to make such deposit under one or
more of the guaranteed letters of credit could trigger the cross-acceleration
provisions in other financing agreements, including the line of credit
referenced above. Certain of these guaranteed letters of credit incorporate the
financial covenants from the line of credit as well as contain cross-default and
cross-acceleration provisions.
The Life Company guarantees certain mortgage securitizations transactions
the Company entered into with FNMA and FHLMC. This guarantee will persist until
the pool of mortgages is paid off in full by the mortgagees. The Life Company
must perform under this guarantee where the mortgagees fail to repay their
mortgages. The maximum amount of future payments the Life Company may be
required to make pursuant to the guarantee is up to 12.25% of the total
principal and interest for the FNMA securitization, or $13.2 million, and up to
10.50% of total principal and interest for the FHLMC securitization, or $14.6
million, at December 31, 2003.
The Company has the following additional guarantees outstanding with
affiliates, related to market value annuity products in the Life Company and it
subsidiary John Hancock Variable Life Insurance Company (see Note 18-Information
Provided in Connection with Market Value Annuity of John Hancock Variable Life
Insurance Company) covering contracts with account values of $406.4 million, and
$304.7 million in senior unsecured notes payable issued by John Hancock Canadian
Corporation, guaranteed by the Company.
Off Balance Sheet Arrangements
The Company has relationships with a number of entities which are not
consolidated into the Company's consolidated financial statements. These
entities include qualified special purpose entities (QSPEs) and other special
purpose entities. In the course of some of its business the Company transfers
assets to, and in some cases, retains interests in QSPEs. The Company may also
purchase interests in QSPEs on the open market.
The Company's primary use of QSPEs arises in its commercial mortgage
banking subsidiary. The Company's commercial mortgage banking subsidiary
originates commercial mortgages and sells them to QSPEs which then issues
mortgage backed securities (MBS). The Company engages in this activity to earn
fees during the origination process, and to generate realized gains during the
securitization process. The Company may purchase MBS from the QSPEs created in
its commercial mortgage banking subsidiary to generate net investment income.
The majority of the Company's MBS portfolio was purchased from unrelated QSPEs.
These QSPEs and other special purpose entities also include CDO funds we
manage and may also invest in, which are considered variable interest entities
and are discussed in detail in Note 3 - Relationships with Variable Interest
Entities to our consolidated financial statements. The Company generates fee
income from the CDO funds we manage, and generates net investment income from
CDOs we invest in, whether we manage them or not.
The Company receives Federal income tax benefits from certain investments
made through variable interest entities.
These arrangements also include credit and collateral support agreements
with FNMA and FHMLC, through which the Company securitized some of its mortgage
investments, which provided a potential source of liquidity to the Company.
These agreements are described in detail in Note 12 - Commitments, Guarantees
and Contingencies to our consolidated financial statements.
The Company's risk of loss from these entities is limited to its
investment in them. Consolidation of unconsolidated accounts from these entities
would inflate the Company's balance sheet but would not be reflective of
additional risk in these entities. In each, there are no potential liabilities
which might arise in the future as a result of these relationships that would
not be completely satisfied by the assets of that entity.
111
JOHN HANCOCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
Contractual Obligations
The following table summarizes the Company's information about contractual
obligations by due date and expiration date as of December 31, 2003. Contractual
obligations of the Company are those obligations fixed by agreement as to dollar
amount and date of payment. These obligations are inputs into the Company's
asset liability management system described elsewhere in this document.
Contractual Obligations as of December 31, 2003
Less than
Payments due under contractual obligations by period Total 1 year 1-3 years 4-5 years After 5 years
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(in millions)
Debt ........................................ $ 1,800.8 $ 485.3 $ 45.2 $ 510.6 $ 759.7
Consumer notes .............................. 2,833.0 82.7 457.9 242.2 2,050.2
GIC's ....................................... 6,464.6 1,905.7 2,496.5 871.2 1,191.2
Funding agreements .......................... 14,055.8 2,266.5 6,634.5 3,192.7 1,962.1
Institutional structured settlements ........ 2,248.8 19.7 48.7 53.2 2,127.2
Annuity certain contracts ................... 1,696.3 154.4 588.9 375.6 577.4
Investment commitments ...................... 2,437.7 2,437.7 -- -- --
Other insurance liabilities ................. 46.6 46.6 -- -- --
Operating lease obligations ................. 923.3 114.4 214.5 168.4 426.0
Other long-term obligations ................. 350.5 57.0 197.1 77.6 18.8
------------------------------------------------------------------
Total payments due under contractual
obligations--by period ............. $32,857.4 $ 7,570.0 $10,683.3 $ 5,491.5 $ 9,112.6
==================================================================
Given the historical cash flow of our subsidiaries and current financial
results, management believes that the cash flow from the operating activities
over the next year will provide sufficient liquidity for our operations, as well
as to satisfy debt service obligations and to pay other operating expenses.
Although we anticipate that we will be able to meet our cash requirements, we
can give no assurances in this regard.
112
JOHN HANCOCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Capital Markets Risk Management. The Company maintains a disciplined,
comprehensive approach to managing capital market risks inherent in its business
and investment operations.
To mitigate capital market risks, and effectively support Company
objectives, investment operations are organized and staffed to focus investment
management expertise on specific classes of investments, with particular
emphasis placed on private placement markets. In addition, a dedicated unit of
asset/liability risk management (ALM) professionals centralizes the Life
Insurance Company's and its U.S. Life Insurance subsidiaries' implementation of
the interest rate risk management program. As an integral component of its ALM
program, derivative instruments are used in accordance with risk reduction
techniques established through Company policy and with formal approval granted
from the New York Insurance Department. The Company's use of derivative
instruments is monitored on a regular basis by the Company's Investment
Compliance Department and reviewed quarterly with senior management and the
Committee of Finance of the Company's wholly-owned subsidiary, John Hancock Life
Insurance Company, (the Company's Committee of Finance).
The Company's principal capital market exposures are credit and interest
rate risk, which includes the impact of inflation, although we have certain
exposures to changes in equity prices and foreign currency exchange rates.
Credit risk pertains to the uncertainty associated with the ability of an
obligor or counterparty to continue to make timely and complete payments of
contractual principal and interest. Interest rate risk pertains to the change in
fair value that occurs within fixed maturity securities or liabilities as market
interest rates move. Equity and foreign currency risk pertain to price
fluctuations, associated with the Company's ownership of equity investments or
non-US dollar denominated investments and liabilities, driven by dynamic market
environments.
Credit Risk. The Company manages the credit risk inherent in its fixed
maturity securities by applying strict credit and underwriting standards, with
specific limits regarding the proportion of permissible below-investment-grade
holdings. We also diversify our fixed maturity securities with respect to
investment quality, issuer, industry, geographical, and property-type
concentrations. Where possible, consideration of external measures of
creditworthiness, such as ratings assigned by nationally recognized rating
agencies such as Moody's and Standard & Poor's, supplement our internal credit
analysis. The Company uses simulation models to examine the probability
distribution of credit losses to ensure that it can readily withstand feasible
adverse scenarios. In addition, the Company periodically examines, on various
levels of aggregation, its actual default loss experience on significant asset
classes to determine if the losses are consistent with the (1) levels assumed in
product pricing, and (2) rating agencies' quality-specific cohort default data.
These tests have generally found the Company's aggregate experience to be
favorable relative to the external benchmarks and consistent with
priced-for-levels.
The Company has a process in place that attempts to identify securities
that could potentially have an impairment that is other than temporary. This
process involves monitoring market events that could impact issuers' credit
ratings, business climate, management changes, acquisition, litigation and
government actions, and other similar factors. This process also involves
monitoring late payments, downgrades by rating agencies, key financial ratios,
financial statements, revenue forecasts and cash flow projections as indicators
of credit issues.
At the end of each quarter, our Investment Review Committee reviews all
securities where market value is less than ninety percent of amortized cost for
three months or more to determine whether impairments need to be taken. This
committee includes the head of workouts, the head of each industry team, and the
head of portfolio management. The analysis focuses on each company's or
project's ability to service its debts in a timely fashion and the length of
time the security has been trading below cost. The results of the analysis are
reviewed by the Life Company's Committee of Finance, a subcommittee of the Life
Company's Board of Directors, quarterly. To supplement this process, a bi-annual
review is made of the entire fixed maturity portfolio to assess credit quality,
including a review of all impairments with the Life Company's Committee of
Finance.
The Company considers and documents relevant facts and circumstances in
evaluating whether the impairment of a security is other than temporary.
Relevant facts and circumstances considered include (1) the length of time the
fair value has been below cost; (2) the financial position of the issuer,
including the current and future impact of any specific events; and (3) the
Company's ability and intent to hold the security to maturity or until it
recovers in value. To the extent the Company determines that a security is
deemed to be other than temporarily impaired, the difference between amortized
cost and fair value would be charged to earnings.
There are a number of significant risks and uncertainties inherent in the
process of monitoring impairments and determining if an impairment is other than
temporary. These risks and uncertainties include (1) the risk that our
assessment of an issuer's ability to meet all of its contractual obligations
will change based on changes in the credit characteristics of that issuer, (2)
the risk that the economic outlook will be worse than expected or have more of
an impact on the issuer than
113
JOHN HANCOCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
anticipated, (3) information, or fraudulent financial statements, could be
provided to our investment professionals who determine the fair value estimates
and other than temporary impairments and (4) the risk that new information
obtained by us or changes in other facts and circumstances lead us to change our
intent to hold the security to maturity or until it recovers in value.
Any of these situations could result in a charge to earnings in a future
period to the extent of the impairment charge recorded. Because the majority of
our portfolio is classified as available-for-sale and held at fair value with
the related unrealized gains (losses) recorded in shareholders' equity, the
charge to earnings should not have a significant impact on shareholders' equity.
As of December 31, 2003 and 2002, the Company's fixed maturity portfolio
was comprised of 88.3% and 88.8% investment grade securities and 11.7% and 11.2%
below-investment-grade securities, respectively. These percentages are
consistent with recent experience and indicative of the Company's long-standing
investment philosophy of pursuing moderate amounts of credit risk in return for
higher expected returns. We believe that credit risk can be successfully managed
given our proprietary credit evaluation models and experienced personnel.
Interest Rate Risk. The Company maintains a tightly controlled approach to
managing its potential interest rate risk. Interest rate risk arises from many
of our primary activities, as we invest substantial funds in interest-sensitive
assets to support the issuance of our various interest-sensitive liabilities,
primarily within our Protection, Asset Gathering and Guaranteed and Structured
Financial Products Segments.
We manage interest rate sensitive segments of our business, and their
supporting investments, under one of two broadly defined risk management methods
designed to provide an appropriate matching of assets and liabilities. For
guaranteed rate products, where contractual liability cash flows are highly
predictable (e.g., GICs or immediate annuities) we apply sophisticated
duration-matching techniques to manage the segment's exposure to both parallel
and non-parallel yield curve movements. Typically this approach involves a
targeted duration mismatch of zero, with an operational tolerance of less than
+/- 18 days, with other techniques used for limiting exposure to non-parallel
risk. Duration measures the sensitivity of the fair value of assets and
liabilities to changes in interest rates. For example, should interest rates
increase by 100 basis points, the fair value of an asset with a 5-year duration
is expected to decrease in value by approximately 5.0%. For non-guaranteed rate
products we apply scenario-modeling techniques to develop investment policies
with what we believe to be the optimal risk/return tradeoff given our risk
constraints. Each scenario is based on near term reasonably possible
hypothetical changes in interest rates that illustrate the potential impact of
such events.
We project asset and liability cash flows on guaranteed rate products and
then discount them against credit-specific interest rate curves to attain fair
values. Duration is then calculated by re-pricing these cash flows against a
modified or "shocked" interest rate curve and evaluating the change in fair
value versus the base case. As of December 31, 2003 and 2002, the fair value of
fixed maturity securities and mortgage loans supporting duration managed
liabilities was approximately $39,636.8 million and $36,143.0 million,
respectively. Based on the information and assumptions we use in our duration
calculations in effect as of December 31, 2003, we estimate that a 100 basis
point immediate, parallel increase in interest rates ("rate shock") would have
no effect on the net fair value, or surplus, of our duration managed assets and
liabilities based on our targeted mismatch of zero, but could be -/+ $19.8
million based on our operational tolerance of 18 days.
The risk management method for non-guaranteed rate products, such as whole
life insurance or single premium deferred annuities, is less formulaic, but more
complex, due to the less predictable nature of the liability cash flows. For
these products, we manage interest rate risk based on scenario-based portfolio
modeling that seeks to identify the most appropriate investment strategy given
probable policyholder behavior and liability crediting needs under a wide range
of interest rate environments. As of December 31, 2003 and 2002, the fair value
of fixed maturity securities and mortgage loans supporting liabilities managed
under this modeling was approximately $37,096.1 million and $32,982.6 million,
respectively. A rate shock (as defined above) as of December 31, 2003 would
decrease the fair value of these assets by $1,405.0 million, which we estimate
would be offset by a comparable change in the fair value of the associated
liabilities, thus minimizing the impact on surplus.
Derivative Instruments
The Company uses a variety of derivative financial instruments, including
swaps, caps, floors, and exchange traded futures contracts, in accordance with
Company investment policy. Permissible derivative applications include the
reduction of economic risk (i.e., hedging) related to changes in yields, prices,
cash flows, and currency exchange rates. In addition, certain limited
applications of income generation are allowed. Examples of this type of use
include the purchase of call options to offset the sale of embedded options in
Company liability issuance or the purchase of swaptions to offset the
114
JOHN HANCOCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
purchase of embedded put options in certain investments. The Company does not
make a market or trade derivatives for speculative purposes.
As of January 1, 2001, SFAS No. 133 became effective for all companies
reporting under GAAP in the United States. Briefly stated, SFAS No. 133 requires
that all derivative instruments must be recorded as either assets or liabilities
on the Company's balance sheet, with quarterly recognition thereafter of changes
in derivative fair values through its income statement. The income effect of
derivatives that meet all requirements of a "qualified hedge" under SFAS No. 133
guidance may be offset, in part or in its entirety, by recognition of changes in
fair value on specifically identified underlying hedged-items. These
hedged-items must be identified at the inception of the hedge and may consist of
assets, liabilities, firm commitments or forecasted transactions. Depending upon
the designated form of the hedge (i.e., fair value or cash flow), changes in
fair value must either be recorded immediately through income or through
shareholders' equity (other comprehensive income) for subsequent amortization
into income.
The Company's Investment Compliance Unit monitors all derivatives activity
for consistency with internal policies and guidelines. All derivatives trading
activity is reported monthly to the Company's Committee of Finance for review,
with a comprehensive governance report provided jointly each quarter by the
Company's Derivatives Supervisory Officer and Chief Investment Compliance
Officer. The table below reflects the Company's derivative positions hedging
interest rate risk as of December 31, 2003. The notional amounts in the table
represent the basis on which pay or receive amounts are calculated and are not
reflective of credit risk. These fair value exposures represent only a point in
time and will be subject to change as a result of ongoing portfolio and risk
management activities.
Fair Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Weighted- -100 Basis +100 Basis
Notional Average Term Point As of Point
Amount (Years) Change (2) 12/31/03 Change (2)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
As of December 31, 2003 (in millions, except for Weighted-Average Term)
- -----------------------
Interest rate swaps......................... $32,181.0 11.8 $(87.4) $(497.0) $(769.0)
CMT swaps................................... 33.4 0.9 0.8 0.8 0.8
Futures contracts (1)....................... 173.8 7.9 9.3 (0.1) (10.3)
Interest rate caps.......................... 1,074.7 4.9 12.9 28.2 50.1
Interest rate floors........................ 4,593.0 6.4 145.2 76.0 37.6
Swaptions................................... 30.0 21.4 (5.6) (2.6) (0.9)
-------------- -----------------------------------------
Totals................................. $38,085.9 10.9 $ 75.2 $(394.7) $(691.7)
============== =========================================
- -----------
(1) Represents the notional value of open contracts as of December 31, 2003.
(2) The selection of a 100 basis point immediate change in interest rates
should not be construed as a prediction by us of future market events but
rather as an illustration of the potential impact of such an event.
Our non-exchange-traded derivatives are exposed to the possibility of loss
from a counterparty failing to perform its obligations under terms of the
derivative contract. We believe the risk of incurring losses due to
nonperformance by our counterparties is remote. To manage this risk, Company
procedures include (a) the on-going evaluation of each counterparty's credit
ratings, (b) the application of credit limits and monitoring procedures based on
an internally developed, scenario-based risk assessment system, (c) quarterly
reporting of each counterparty's "potential exposure", (d) master netting
agreements, and (e) the use of collateral agreements. Futures contracts trade on
organized exchanges and have effectively no credit risk.
Equity Risk
Equity risk is the possibility that we will incur economic losses due to
adverse changes in a particular common stock or warrant that we hold in our
portfolio. In order to reduce our exposure to market fluctuations on some of our
common stock portfolio, we use equity collar agreements. These equity collar
agreements limit the market value fluctuations on their underlying equity
securities. Our equity collars are comprised of an equal number of purchased put
options and written call options, each with strike rates equidistant from the
stock price at the time the contract is established. As of December 31, 2003,
the fair value of our equity securities portfolio was $79.2 million. The fair
value of our equity collar agreements as of December 31, 2003 was $1.95 million.
A hypothetical 15% decline in the December 31, 2003 value of the equity
securities would result in an unrealized loss of approximately $9.37 million.
The selection of a 15% immediate change in the value of equity securities should
not be construed as a prediction by us of future market events but rather as an
illustration of the potential impact of such an event. The fair value of any
unhedged common stock holdings will rise or fall with equity market
115
JOHN HANCOCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
and company-specific trends. In certain cases the Company classifies its equity
holdings as trading securities. Gains and losses, both realized and unrealized,
on equity securities classified as trading, are part of investment returns
related to equity indexed universal life insurance policies sold at Maritime
Life and are included in benefits to policyholders. These holdings are
marked-to-market through the income statement, creating investment income
volatility that is effectively neutralized by changes in corresponding liability
reserves.
Foreign Currency Risk
Foreign currency risk is the possibility that we will incur economic
losses due to adverse changes in foreign currency exchange rates. This risk
arises in part from our international operations and the issuance of certain
foreign currency-denominated funding agreements sold to non-qualified
institutional investors in the international market. We apply currency swap
agreements to hedge the exchange risk inherent in our funding agreements
denominated in foreign currencies. We also own fixed maturity securities that
are denominated in foreign currencies. We use derivatives to hedge the foreign
currency risk of these securities (both interest and principal payments). At
December 31, 2003, the fair value of our foreign currency denominated fixed
maturity securities was approximately $958.0 million. The fair value of our
currency swap agreements at December 31, 2003 supporting foreign denominated
bonds was $(228.2) million.
We estimate that as of December 31, 2003, a modeled 10% immediate change
in each of the foreign currency exchange rates to which we are exposed,
including the currency swap agreements, would result in no material change to
the net fair value of our foreign currency-denominated instruments identified
above. The selection of a 10% immediate change in all currency exchange rates
should not be construed as a prediction by us of future market events but rather
as an illustration of the potential impact of such an event. Our largest
individual currency exposure is to the Canadian dollar.
The modeling technique we use to calculate our exposure does not take into
account correlation among foreign currency exchange rates or correlation among
various markets. Our actual experience may differ from the results noted above
due to the correlation assumptions utilized or if events occur that were not
included in the methodology, such as significant illiquidity or other market
events.
Effects of Inflation
Inflation has not been a material factor in our operations during the past
decade in terms of our investment performance, expenses, or product sales.
116
JOHN HANCOCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
ITEM 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
INDEX TO AUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Report of Independent Auditors...............................................118
Audited Consolidated Financial Statements:
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2003 and 2002.................119
Consolidated Statements of Income for the Years Ended December 31, 2003,
2002 and 2001..........................................................121
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholder's Equity and Comprehensive
Income for the Years Ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001............123
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31, 2003,
2002 and 2001..........................................................124
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements...................................126
117
JOHN HANCOCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
The Board of Directors
John Hancock Financial Services, Inc.
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of John
Hancock Financial Services, Inc. as of December 31, 2003 and 2002, and the
related consolidated statements of income, changes in shareholders' equity and
comprehensive income, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period
ended December 31, 2003. Our audits also included the financial statement
schedules listed in the Index at Item 15(a). These financial statements and
schedules are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility
is to express an opinion on these financial statements and schedules based on
our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally
accepted in the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform
the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements
are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis,
evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An
audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant
estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial
statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis
for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly,
in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of John Hancock
Financial Services, Inc. at December 31, 2003 and 2002, and the consolidated
results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in
the period ended December 31, 2003, in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States. Also, in our opinion, the related
financial statement schedules, when considered in relation to the basic
financial statements taken as a whole, present fairly in all material respects
the information set forth therein.
As discussed in Note 1 to the financial statements, in 2003 the Company
changed its method of accounting for stock-based compensation, participating
pension contracts and modified coinsurance contracts. In 2002 the Company
changed its method of accounting for goodwill and other intangible assets and in
2001 the Company changed its method of accounting for its employee pension plan
and postretirement health and welfare plans and for derivatives.
/s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP
Boston, Massachusetts
February 25, 2004
118
JOHN HANCOCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
December 31,
-------------------------
2003 2002
-------------------------
(in millions)
Assets
Investments--Notes 2 and 4
Fixed maturities:
Held-to-maturity--at amortized cost (fair value: 2003--$1,523.0; 2002--$1,781.8) .................. $ 1,498.6 $ 1,732.2
Available-for-sale--at fair value (cost: 2003--$48,896.8; 2002--$44,755.0) ....................... 51,887.0 45,847.3
Trading securities--at fair value (cost: 2003--$40.7; 2002--$18.9 ) .............................. 42.2 18.9
Equity securities:
Available-for-sale--at fair value (cost: 2003--$665.8; 2002--$624.7 ) ............................. 795.1 672.3
Trading securities--at fair value (cost: 2003--$435.3; 2002--$287.5) .............................. 448.4 296.3
Mortgage loans on real estate ........................................................................ 12,936.0 11,805.7
Real estate .......................................................................................... 195.0 318.6
Policy loans ......................................................................................... 2,117.9 2,097.2
Short-term investments ............................................................................... 121.6 211.2
Other invested assets ................................................................................ 3,011.3 2,937.8
---------- ----------
Total Investments .............................................................................. 73,053.1 65,937.5
========== ==========
Cash and cash equivalents ............................................................................ 3,121.6 1,190.6
Accrued investment income ............................................................................ 756.0 785.9
Premiums and accounts receivable ..................................................................... 273.6 217.1
Deferred policy acquisition costs .................................................................... 4,301.0 3,996.3
Reinsurance recoverable--Note 10 ..................................................................... 2,095.5 1,777.2
Other assets ......................................................................................... 3,577.8 3,132.2
Separate account assets .............................................................................. 24,121.9 20,827.3
----------
---------- ----------
Total Assets ............................................................................... $111,300.5 $ 97,864.1
========== ==========
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial
statements.
119
JOHN HANCOCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS - (CONTINUED)
December 31,
---------------------------
2003 2002
---------------------------
(in millions)
Liabilities and Shareholders' Equity
Liabilities
Future policy benefits ............................................................................. $ 45,609.6 $ 39,657.0
Policyholders' funds ............................................................................... 22,728.1 23,054.4
Consumer notes--Note 7 ............................................................................. 1,550.4 290.2
Unearned revenue ................................................................................... 1,140.4 895.8
Unpaid claims and claim expense reserves ........................................................... 346.2 205.6
Dividends payable to policyholders ................................................................. 600.6 585.7
Short-term debt--Note 7 ............................................................................ 485.3 348.9
Long-term debt--Note 7 ............................................................................. 1,410.0 1,450.3
Income taxes--Note 5 ............................................................................... 1,813.4 1,096.8
Other liabilities .................................................................................. 3,118.5 3,078.3
Separate account liabilities ....................................................................... 24,121.9 20,827.3
---------- ----------
Total Liabilities ............................................................................ 102,924.4 91,490.3
========== ==========
Minority interests--Note 9 ......................................................................... 160.4 162.7
Commitments, guarantees and contingencies--Note 12
Shareholders' Equity--Note 13
Common stock, $.01 par value; 2.0 billion shares authorized;
319.8 million and 317.5 shares issued, respectively .............................................. 3.2 3.2
Additional paid in capital ......................................................................... 5,174.0 5,127.9
Retained earnings .................................................................................. 2,318.7 1,614.0
Accumulated other comprehensive income ............................................................. 1,788.8 523.2
Treasury stock, at cost (30.0 million and 29.5 million shares, respectively) ....................... (1,069.0) (1,057.2)
---------- ----------
Total Shareholders' Equity ................................................................... 8,215.7 6,211.1
---------- ----------
Total Liabilities and Shareholders' Equity ................................................... $111,300.5 $ 97,864.1
========== ==========
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial
statements.
120
JOHN HANCOCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
Years Ended December 31,
-----------------------------------
2003 2002 2001
-----------------------------------
(in millions)
Revenues
Premiums .............................................................................. $ 4,147.7 $ 3,377.1 $ 3,851.3
Universal life and investment-type product charges .................................... 838.9 815.2 772.5
Net investment income--Note 2 ......................................................... 4,227.0 3,934.1 3,944.9
Net realized investment and other gains (losses), net of related
amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs, amounts credited
to participating pension contractholders
and the policyholder dividend obligation ($(51.1), $(69.8)
and $(1.1), respectively)--Notes 1, 2 and 14 ....................................... 33.6 (454.7) (249.1)
Investment management revenues, commissions and other fees ............................ 532.4 550.7 624.4
Other revenue ......................................................................... 291.7 255.7 186.5
--------- --------- ---------
Total revenues .................................................................. 10,071.3 8,478.1 9,130.5
========= ========= =========
Benefits and expenses
Benefits to policyholders, excluding amounts related to net realized
investment and other gains (losses) credited to participating pension
contractholders and policyholder dividend obligation ($(60.1),
$(35.2)and $25.3, respectively)--Notes 1, 2 and 14 ................................. 6,084.3 5,387.7 5,904.7
Other operating costs and expenses .................................................... 1,755.7 1,518.6 1,521.6
Amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs, excluding amounts
related to net realized investment and other gains
(losses) ($9.0, $(34.6) and $(26.4) respectively)--
Notes 1, 2 and 14 .................................................................. 315.5 350.2 306.8
Dividends to policyholders ............................................................ 566.9 585.4 571.3
--------- --------- ---------
Total benefits and expenses ..................................................... 8,722.4 7,841.9 8,304.4
Income before income taxes and cumulative effect of accounting changes ...................... 1,348.9 636.2 826.1
Income taxes--Note 5 ........................................................................ 376.7 136.7 214.6
--------- --------- ---------
Income before cumulative effect of accounting changes ....................................... 972.2 499.5 611.5
Cumulative effect of accounting changes, net of tax--Note 1 ................................. (166.2) -- 7.2
--------- --------- ---------
Net income .................................................................................. $ 806.0 $ 499.5 $ 618.7
========= ========= =========
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial
statements.
121
JOHN HANCOCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME - (CONTINUED)
Year Ended December 31,
------------------------------------
2003 2002 2001
------------------------------------
(in millions, except per share data)
Basic earnings per common share:
Income before cumulative effect of accounting changes .................... $ 3.38 $ 1.71 $ 2.01
Cumulative effect of accounting changes .................................. (0.58) -- 0.02
------- ------- -------
Net income ............................................................... $ 2.80 $ 1.71 $ 2.03
======= ======= =======
Diluted earnings per common share:
Income before cumulative effect of accounting changes .................... $ 3.37 $ 1.70 $ 1.99
Cumulative effect of accounting changes .................................. (0.58) -- 0.02
------- ------- -------
Net income ............................................................... $ 2.79 $ 1.70 $ 2.01
======= ======= =======
Weighted-average shares used in basic earnings per common share
calculations ................................................................ 287.5 291.6 304.6
Dilutive securities
Stock options ............................................................ 1.0 1.6 2.7
Non-vested stock ......................................................... 0.3 0.3 0.3
------- ------- -------
Weighted-average shares used in diluted earnings per common share
calculations ................................................................ 288.8 293.5 307.6
------- ------- -------
Cash dividends paid per common share ........................................... $ 0.35 $ 0.32 $ 0.31
======= ======= =======
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial
statements.
122
JOHN HANCOCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
Accumulated
Additional Other Total
Common Paid In Retained Comprehensive Treasury Shareholder's Outstanding
Stock Capital Earnings Income (Loss) Stock Equity Shares
----- ------- -------- ------------- ----- ------ ------
(in millions, except outstanding share data in thousands)
Balance at January 1, 2001 $3.2 $5,086.4 $ 680.4 $ 77.3 $ (91.8) $5,755.5 311,988.9
Restricted stock issued.................. 2.8 2.8 81.4
Options exercised........................ 12.2 12.2 868.3
Forfeitures of restricted stock.......... (2.1) (2.1) (64.4)
Comprehensive income:
Net income............................ 618.7 618.7
Other comprehensive income, net of tax:
Net unrealized gains (losses)....... (59.9) (59.9)
Foreign currency translation
adjustment (28.4) (28.4)
Minimum pension liability........... 15.2 15.2
Net accumulated gains (losses) on
cash flow hedges.................. (3.8) (3.8)
--------- ---------
Comprehensive income..................... 541.8
Treasury stock acquired.................. (580.4) (580.4) (15,444.1)
Dividends paid to shareholders........... (92.4) (92.4)
Change in accounting principles.......... 227.6 227.6
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Balance at December 31, 2001................ $3.2 $5,099.3 $1,206.7 $ 228.0 $(672.2) $5,865.0 297,430.1
===================================================================================
Restricted stock issued.................. 4.7 4.7 646.4
Options exercised........................ 13.9 13.9 938.4
Forfeitures of restricted stock.......... (0.3) (0.3) (11.4)
Restricted stock amortization............ 5.0 5.0
Issuance of shares for
board compensation 0.3 0.3 7.5
Comprehensive income:
Tax benefit on option exercises.......... 5.0 5.0
Net income............................ 499.5 499.5
Other comprehensive income, net of tax:
Net unrealized gains (losses)....... 130.9 130.9
Foreign currency translation
adjustment 13.2 13.2
Minimum pension liability........... (24.3) (24.3)
Net accumulated gains (losses) on
cash flow hedges.................. 175.4 175.4
--------- ---------
Comprehensive income..................... 794.7
Treasury stock acquired.................. (385.0) (385.0) (11,032.4)
Dividends paid to shareholders........... (92.2) (92.2)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Balance at December 31, 2002................ $3.2 $5,127.9 $1,614.0 $ 523.2 $(1,057.2) 6,211.1 287,978.6
===================================================================================
Restricted stock issued..................... 19.3 19.3 1,177.4
Options exercised........................... 19.1 19.1 951.0
Forfeitures of restricted stock............. (0.1) (0.1) (4.9)
Issuance of shares for board compensation... 0.9 0.9 32.8
Sale of stock to employees.................. 2.6 2.6 68.4
Tax benefit on option exercises............. 4.3 4.3
Comprehensive income:
Net income............................ 806.0 806.0
Other comprehensive income, net of tax:
Net unrealized gains (losses)....... 1,020.9 1,020.9
Foreign currency translation
adjustment 137.9 137.9
Minimum pension liability........... (21.9) (21.9)
Net accumulated gains (losses) on
cash flow hedges.................. 28.8 28.8
--------- ---------
Comprehensive income........................ 1,971.7
Treasury stock acquired..................... (11.8) (11.8) (414.9)
Dividends paid to shareholders.............. (101.3) (101.3)
Change in accounting principle.............. 99.9 99.9
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Balance at December 31, 2003................ $3.2 $5,174.0 $2,318.7 $1,788.8 $(1,069.0) $8,215.7 289,788.4
===================================================================================
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial
statements.
123
JOHN HANCOCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
Years Ended December 31,
---------------------------------------
2003 2002 2001
---------------------------------------
(in millions)
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income ................................................................ $ 806.0 $ 499.5 $ 618.7
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash
provided by operating activities:
Amortization of discount - fixed maturities ...................... (23.0) (116.6) (160.9)
Net realized investment and other (gains) losses ................. (33.6) 454.7 249.1
Change in accounting principles .................................. 166.2 -- (7.2)
Change in deferred policy acquisition costs ...................... (418.1) (344.5) (274.1)
Depreciation and amortization .................................... 54.1 59.9 79.6
Net cash flows from trading securities ........................... (175.4) 5.4 (69.4)
Decrease (increase) in accrued investment income ................. 29.9 (3.8) (38.8)
(Increase) decrease in premiums and accounts receivable .......... (56.5) 36.7 (15.0)
Increase in other assets and other liabilities, net .............. (316.8) (216.7) (453.7)
Increase in policy liabilities and accruals, net ................. 3,045.4 2,122.7 2,472.1
Increase (decrease) in income taxes .............................. (25.5) 63.8 233.4
--------- --------- ---------
Net cash provided by operating activities .................... 3,052.7 2,561.1 2,633.8
Cash flows used in investing activities:
Sales of:
Fixed maturities available-for-sale ................................... 12,101.7 5,838.0 16,929.5
Equity securities available-for-sale .................................. 431.3 370.2 616.5
Real estate ........................................................... 175.3 129.9 57.3
Short-term investments and other invested assets ...................... 523.2 460.1 153.3
Home office properties ................................................ 887.6 -- --
Maturities, prepayments and scheduled redemptions of:
Fixed maturities held-to-maturity ..................................... 227.5 216.6 243.8
Fixed maturities available-for-sale ................................... 3,618.9 2,901.2 3,211.9
Short-term investments and other invested assets ...................... 817.3 331.9 214.0
Mortgage loans on real estate ......................................... 1,512.3 1,668.5 1,575.7
Purchases of:
Fixed maturities held-to-maturity ..................................... (69.5) (27.6) (66.7)
Fixed maturities available-for-sale ................................... (19,182.4) (14,436.9) (27,149.8)
Equity securities available-for-sale .................................. (284.9) (170.8) (367.3)
Real estate ........................................................... (40.9) (14.1) (53.5)
Short-term investments and other invested assets ...................... (1,833.4) (1,557.0) (537.2)
Mortgage loans on real estate issued .................................. (2,407.3) (2,348.6) (1,577.9)
Net cash paid related to acquisition/sale
of businesses ......................................................... (24.0) -- (132.5)
Other, net ................................................................ (102.3) (75.5) 100.0
--------- --------- ---------
Net cash used in investing activities ............................ (3,649.6) (6,714.1) (6,782.9)
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial
statements.
124
JOHN HANCOCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS - (CONTINUED)
Years Ended December 31,
-----------------------------------------
2003 2002 2001
-----------------------------------------
(in millions)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Acquisition of treasury stock ............................................. $ (11.8) $ (385.0) $ (580.4)
Dividends paid on common stock ............................................ (101.3) (92.2) (92.4)
Universal life and investment-type contract deposits ...................... 8,188.1 9,641.0 10,755.4
Universal life and investment-type contract maturities and
withdrawals ........................................................... (7,218.5) (5,726.3) (8,430.6)
Issuance of preferred stock ............................................... -- 61.9 --
Issuance of consumer notes ................................................ 1,260.2 290.2 --
Increase in bank deposits ................................................. 293.9 -- --
Issuance of short-term debt ............................................... 148.9 92.8 56.9
Issuance of long-term debt ................................................ -- 20.0 744.2
Repayment of short-tem debt ............................................... (158.0) (67.0) (18.3)
Repayment of long-term debt ............................................... (5.5) (54.9) (29.7)
Net increase (decrease) in commercial paper ............................... 131.9 249.4 (222.3)
--------- --------- ---------
Net cash provided by financing activities ................................. 2,527.9 4,029.9 2,182.8
--------- --------- ---------
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents ...................... 1,931.0 (123.1) (1,966.3)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year ................................. 1,190.6 1,313.7 3,280.0
--------- --------- ---------
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year ....................................... $ 3,121.6 $ 1,190.6 $ 1,313.7
========= ========= =========
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial
statements.
125
JOHN HANCOCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note 1--Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Business. John Hancock Financial Services, Inc. (the Company) is a
diversified financial services organization that provides a broad range of
insurance and investment products and investment management and advisory
services.
On September 28, 2003, the Company entered into a definitive merger
agreement with Manulife Financial Corporation (Manulife) which is expected to
close early in the second quarter of 2004. In accordance with the agreement,
each share of JHFS common stock will, at the time of the merger, be converted
into the right to receive 1.1853 shares of Manulife stock. It is estimated that
the shares of Manulife common stock to be issued to JHFS shareholders in the
merger will represent approximately 42.6% of the outstanding Manulife common
stock after the merger. The merger has been approved by the Company's
shareholders but the closing of the merger remains subject to certain
conditions, including the approval by certain U.S. and Canadian regulatory
authorities. Until the merger occurs, the Company will continue to operate
independently of Manulife. Thereafter, the Company will operate as a subsidiary
of Manulife. The John Hancock name will be Manulife's primary U.S. brand. This
Form 10-K does not reflect or assume any changes to JHFS' business which may
occur as a result of the proposed merger with Manulife. For additional
information, refer to John Hancock and other related public filings with the
U.S. SEC relating to the merger.
Basis of Presentation. The preparation of financial statements in
conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States
requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts
reported in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual
results could differ from those estimates. All of the Company's United States
Securities and Exchange Commission filings are available on the internet at
www.sec.gov, under the name Hancock John Financial.
- -----------
Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform to the
current year presentation.
The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of
the Company and its majority-owned and or controlled subsidiaries. All
significant intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated.
Partnerships, joint venture interests and other equity investments in
which the Company does not have a controlling financial interest, but has
significant influence, are recorded using the equity method of accounting and
are included in other invested assets. Other entities in which the Company has a
less than controlling financial interest, whether variable interest entities
(VIEs) or not, are accounted for under guidance appropriate to each
relationship, whether the Company invests in their debt or equity securities,
issues funding agreements to them, manages them as investment advisor, or
performs other transactions with them or provides services to them. Please refer
to the Recent Accounting Pronouncements section below for a discussion of new
accounting guidance relative to VIEs.
Recent Acquisition/Disposal Activity. The acquisitions described under the
table below were recorded under the purchase method of accounting and,
accordingly, the operating results have been included in the Company's
consolidated results of operations from each date of acquisition. Each purchase
price was allocated to the assets acquired and the liabilities assumed based on
estimated fair values, with the excess, if any, of the applicable purchase price
over the estimated fair values of the acquired assets and liabilities recorded
as goodwill. These acquisitions were made by the Company in execution of its
plan to acquire businesses and products that have strategic value, meet its
earnings requirements and advance the growth of its current businesses.
The disposal described under the table below was conducted in order to
execute the Company's strategy to focus resources on businesses in which it can
have a leadership position. The table below presents actual and proforma data
for comparative purposes for the periods indicated to demonstrate the proforma
effect of the acquisitions and disposal as if they occurred on January 1, 2001.
126
JOHN HANCOCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (CONTINUED)
Note 1--Summary of Significant Accounting Policies - (continued)
Years Ended December 31,
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2003 2002 2001
Proforma 2003 Proforma 2002 Proforma 2001
------------ ------------ ------------ ----------- ----------- -----------
(unaudited) (unaudited) (unaudited)
(in millions, except per-share data)
Revenue...................................... $10,104.7 $10,071.3 $8,645.0 $8,478.1 $9,347.6 $9,130.5
Net income................................... $807.7 $806.0 $516.1 $499.5 $643.5 $618.7
Earnings per share, diluted.................. $2.80 $2.79 $1.76 $1.70 $2.09 $2.01
Acquisitions:
On July 8, 2003, the Maritime Life Insurance Company (Maritime Life), a
majority owned Canadian subsidiary of the Company, completed its purchase of the
insurance business of Liberty Health, a Canadian division of U.S.-based Liberty
Mutual Insurance Company, through a reinsurance agreement for approximately
$97.5 million. Through the agreement, Maritime Life assumed the entire business
of Liberty Health, including its group life, group disability and group health
divisions, as well as its individual health insurance business. There was no
impact on the Company's results of operations from the acquired insurance
business during 2002 or the first six months of 2003.
On December 31, 2002, the Company acquired the fixed universal life
insurance business of Allmerica Financial Corporation (Allmerica) through a
reinsurance agreement for approximately $104.3 million. There was no impact on
the Company's results of operations from the acquired insurance business during
2002.
On October 1, 2001, Maritime Life completed its purchase of all of the
shares of Royal & Sun Alliance Life Insurance Company of Canada (RSAF) for
approximately $149.9 million. RSAF's business includes life insurance,
guaranteed interest savings and retirement products. The net income relating to
the acquired operations included in the Company's results from the date of
acquisition through December 31, 2001 was $2.4 million.
On April 2, 2001, a subsidiary of the Company, Signature Fruit Company,
LLC (Signature Fruit), purchased certain assets and assumed certain liabilities
out of bankruptcy proceedings of Tri Valley Growers, Inc., a cooperative
association, for approximately $53.0 million. The net losses related to the
acquired operations included in the Company's results from the date of
acquisition through December 31, 2001 were $3.4 million.
Disposal:
On June 19, 2003, the Company agreed to sell its group life insurance
business through a reinsurance agreement with Metropolitan Life Insurance
Company, Inc (MetLife). The Company is ceding all activity after May 1, 2003 to
MetLife. The transaction was recorded as of May 1, 2003, and closed November 4,
2003.
127
JOHN HANCOCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (CONTINUED)
Note 1--Summary of Significant Accounting Policies - (continued)
Investments. The Company classifies its debt and equity investment
securities into one of three categories: held-to-maturity, available-for-sale or
trading. The Company determines the appropriate classification of debt
securities at the time of purchase and re-evaluates such designation as of each
balance sheet date. Fixed maturity investments include bonds, mortgage-backed
securities, and mandatorily redeemable preferred stock and are classified as
held-to-maturity, available-for-sale, or trading. Those bonds and
mortgage-backed securities that the Company has the positive intent and ability
to hold to maturity are classified as held-to-maturity and carried at amortized
cost. Fixed maturity investments not classified as held-to-maturity are
classified as available-for-sale or trading and are carried at fair value.
Unrealized gains and losses related to available-for-sale securities are
reflected in shareholders' equity, net of related amortization of deferred
policy acquisition costs, amounts credited to participating pension
contractholders, amounts credited to the policyholder dividend obligation, and
applicable taxes. Interest income is generally recognized on the accrual basis.
The amortized cost of debt securities is adjusted for amortization of premiums
and accretion of discounts to maturity. Such amortization is included in
investment income. The amortized cost of fixed maturity investments is adjusted
for impairments in value deemed to be other than temporary, and such adjustments
are reported as a component of net realized investment and other gains (losses).
Gains and losses, both realized and unrealized, on fixed maturity securities
classified as trading are included in benefits to policyholders as part of
investment returns related to equity indexed universal life insurance policies
sold at Maritime Life.
For the mortgage-backed bond portion of the fixed maturity investment
portfolio, the Company recognizes income using a constant effective yield based
on anticipated prepayments and the estimated economic life of the securities.
When actual prepayments differ significantly from anticipated prepayments, the
effective yield is recalculated to reflect actual payments to date plus
anticipated future payments, and any resulting adjustment is included in net
investment income.
Equity securities include common stock and non-mandatorily redeemable
preferred stock. Equity securities that have readily determinable fair values
are carried at fair value. For equity securities that the Company classifies as
available-for-sale, unrealized gains and losses are reflected in shareholders'
equity, as described above for fixed maturity securities. Impairments in value
deemed to be other than temporary are reported as a component of net realized
investment and other gains (losses). Gains and losses, both realized and
unrealized, on equity securities classified as trading, are part of investment
returns related to equity indexed universal life insurance policies sold at
Maritime Life and are included in benefits to policyholders.
Mortgage loans on real estate are carried at unpaid principal balances
adjusted for amortization of premium or discount, less allowance for probable
losses. When it is probable that the Company will be unable to collect all
amounts of principal and interest due according to the contractual terms of the
mortgage loan agreement, the loan is deemed to be impaired and a valuation
allowance for probable losses is established. The valuation allowance is based
on the present value of the expected future cash flows, discounted at the loan's
original effective interest rate, or is based on the collateral value of the
loan if the loan is collateral dependent. The Company estimates this level to be
adequate to absorb estimated probable credit losses that exist at the balance
sheet date. Any change to the valuation allowance for mortgage loans on real
estate is reported as a component of net realized investment and other gains
(losses). Interest received on impaired mortgage loans on real estate is
included in interest income in the period received. If foreclosure becomes
probable, the measurement method used is based on the collateral value.
Foreclosed real estate is recorded at the collateral's fair value at the date of
foreclosure, which establishes a new cost basis.
128
JOHN HANCOCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (CONTINUED)
Note 1--Summary of Significant Accounting Policies - (continued)
Investment real estate, which the Company has the intent to hold for the
production of income, is carried at depreciated cost, using the straight-line
method of depreciation, less adjustments for impairments in value. In those
cases where it is determined that the carrying amount of investment real estate
is not recoverable, an impairment loss is recognized based on the difference
between the depreciated cost and fair value of the asset. The Company reports
impairment losses as part of net realized investment and other gains (losses).
Real estate to be disposed of is carried at the lower of cost or fair
value less costs to sell. Any change to the valuation allowance for real estate
to be disposed of is reported as a component of net realized investment and
other gains (losses). The Company does not depreciate real estate to be
disposed. The carrying value of real estate to be disposed of was $28.5 million
and $143.8 million at December 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively and is reported
in real estate in the investment section of the consolidated balance sheets. On
March 14, 2003, the Company sold three of its Home Office properties to Beacon
Capital Partners for $910.0 million. See Note 8 - Sale/Leaseback Transaction and
Other Lease Obligations.
Policy loans are carried at unpaid principal balances, which approximate
fair value.
Short-term investments are carried at amortized cost, which approximates
fair value.
Net realized investment and other gains (losses), other than those related
to separate accounts for which the Company does not bear the investment risk,
are determined on the basis of specific identification and are reported net of
related amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs, amounts credited to
participating pension contractholder accounts, and amounts credited to the
policyholder dividend obligation.
Derivative Financial Instruments. The Company uses various derivative
instruments to hedge and manage its exposure to changes in interest rate levels,
foreign exchange rates and equity market prices, and also to manage the duration
of assets and liabilities. All derivative instruments are carried on the
consolidated balance sheets at fair value.
In certain cases, the Company uses hedge accounting as allowed by the
Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards (SFAS) No. 133, "Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging
Activities," as amended, by designating derivative instruments as either fair
value hedges or cash flow hedges. For derivative instruments that are designated
and qualify as fair value hedges, any changes in fair value of the derivative
instruments as well as the offsetting changes in fair value of the hedged items
are recorded in net realized investment and other gains (losses). For fair value
hedges, when the derivative has been terminated, a final fair value change is
recorded in net realized investment and other gains (losses), as well as the
offsetting changes in fair value for the hedged item. At maturity, expiration or
sale of the hedged item, a final fair value change for the hedged item is
recorded in net realized investment and other gains (losses), as well as
offsetting changes in fair value for the derivative. Basis adjustments are
amortized into income through net realized investment and other gains (losses).
For derivative instruments that are designated and qualify as cash flow
hedges, the effective portion of the change in fair value of the derivative
instrument is recorded in other comprehensive income, and then reclassified into
income when the hedged item affects income. When a cash flow hedge is
terminated, the effective portion of the accumulated derivative gain or loss
continues to be reported in other comprehensive income and then is reclassified
into income when the hedged item affects income. If it is determined that the
forecasted transaction is not probable of occurring, the accumulated other
comprehensive income is immediately recognized in earnings.
Hedge effectiveness is assessed quarterly using a variety of techniques
including regression analysis and cumulative dollar offset. When it is
determined that a derivative is not effective as a hedge, the Company
discontinues hedge accounting. In certain cases, there is no hedge
ineffectiveness because the derivative instrument was constructed such that all
the terms of the derivative exactly match the hedged risk in the hedged item.
In cases where the Company receives or pays a premium as consideration for
entering into a derivative instrument (i.e., interest rate caps and floors,
swaptions, and equity collars), the premium is amortized into investment income
over the term of the derivative instrument. The change in fair value of such
premiums (i.e., the inherent ineffectiveness of the derivative) is excluded from
the assessment of hedge effectiveness and is included in net realized investment
and other gains (losses). Changes in fair value of derivatives that are not
hedges are included in net realized investment and other gains (losses).
129
JOHN HANCOCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (CONTINUED)
Note 1--Summary of Significant Accounting Policies - (continued)
Cash and Cash Equivalents. Cash and cash equivalents include cash and all
highly liquid debt investments with a remaining maturity of three months or less
when purchased.
Deferred Policy Acquisition Costs. Deferred policy acquisition costs (DAC)
are costs that vary with, and are related primarily to, the production of new
insurance business and have been deferred to the extent that they are deemed
recoverable. Such costs include sales commissions, certain costs of policy
issuance and underwriting, and certain agency expenses. The Company tests the
recoverability of its DAC quarterly with a model that uses data such as market
performance, lapse rates and expense levels. As of December 31, 2003, the
Company's DAC was deemed recoverable. Similarly, any amounts assessed as
initiation fees, or front-end loads, are recorded as unearned revenue. For
non-participating term life and long-term care insurance products, such costs
are amortized over the premium-paying period of the related policies using
assumptions consistent with those used in computing policy benefit reserves. For
participating traditional life insurance policies, such costs are amortized over
the life of the policies at a constant rate based on the present value of the
estimated gross margin amounts expected to be realized over the lives of the
policies. Estimated gross margin amounts include anticipated premiums and
investment results less claims and administrative expenses, changes in the net
level premium reserve and expected annual policyholder dividends. For universal
life insurance policies and investment-type products, such costs and unearned
revenues are being amortized generally in proportion to the change in present
value of expected gross profits arising principally from surrender charges,
investment results and mortality and expense margins.
In the development of expected gross profits, the Company is required to
estimate the growth in the policyholder account balances upon which certain
asset based fees are charged. In doing so, the Company assumes that, over the
long term, account balances will grow from investment performance. The rate of
growth takes into account the current fixed income/equity mix of account
balances as well as historical fixed income and equity investment returns. The
Company also assumes that historical variances from the long-term rate of
investment return will reverse over the next five year period. The resulting
rates for the next five years are reviewed for reasonableness, and they are
raised or lowered if they produce an annual growth rate that the Company
believes to be unreasonable.
The effects on the amortization of DAC and unearned revenues of revisions
to estimated gross margins and profits are reflected in earnings in the period
such revisions are made. Expected gross profits or expected gross margins are
discounted at periodically revised interest rates and are applied to the
remaining benefit period. At December 31, 2003, the average discount rate was
8.4% for participating traditional life insurance products and 6.0% for
universal life products. The total amortization period was 30 years for both
participating traditional life insurance products and universal life products.
As of September 30, 2002, the Company changed future assumptions with
respect to the expected gross profits in its variable life and variable annuity
businesses. First, we lowered the long-term growth rate assumption from 9%, to
8%, gross of fees. Second, we lowered the average growth rates for the next five
years from the mid-teens to 13%. Finally, we increased certain fee rates on
these policies (the variable series trust (VST) fee increase). Total
amortization of DAC, including the acceleration of amortization of DAC from the
assumption changes mentioned above, was $315.5 million, $350.2 million and
$306.8 million for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002, and 2001,
respectively.
Amortization of DAC is allocated to: (1) net realized investment and other
gains (losses) for those products in which such gains (losses) have a direct
impact on the amortization of DAC; (2) unrealized investment gains and losses,
net of tax, to provide for the effect on the DAC asset that would result from
the realization of unrealized gains and losses on assets backing participating
traditional life insurance and universal life and investment-type contracts; and
(3) a separate component of benefits and expenses to reflect amortization
related to the gross margins or profits, excluding realized gains and losses,
relating to policies and contracts in force.
130
JOHN HANCOCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (CONTINUED)
Note 1--Summary of Significant Accounting Policies - (continued)
Net realized investment and other gains (losses) related to certain
products have a direct impact on the amortization of DAC as such gains and
losses affect the amount and timing of profit emergence. Accordingly, to the
extent that such amortization results from net realized investment and other
gains (losses), management believes that presenting realized investment gains
and losses net of related amortization of DAC provides information useful in
evaluating the operating performance of the Company. This presentation may not
be comparable to presentations made by other insurers.
Reinsurance. The Company utilizes reinsurance agreements to provide for
greater diversification of business, allowing management to control exposure to
potential losses arising from large risks and provide additional capacity for
growth.
Assets and liabilities related to reinsurance ceded contracts are reported
on a gross basis. The accompanying statements of income reflect premiums,
benefits and settlement expenses net of reinsurance ceded. Reinsurance premiums,
commissions, expense reimbursements, benefits and reserves related to reinsured
business are accounted for on bases consistent with those used in accounting for
the original policies issued and the terms of the reinsurance contracts. The
Company remains liable to its policyholders to the extent that counterparties to
reinsurance ceded contracts do not meet their contractual obligations. Refer to
Note 10-Reinsurance for additional disclosures regarding this topic.
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets. The excess of cost over the fair
value of net assets of businesses acquired in business combinations (goodwill)
is recognized as indefinite-lived intangible assets which are included in other
assets in the consolidated balance sheets. Starting in 2002, goodwill is no
longer amortized, rather it is reviewed for impairment annually using valuation
models based on earnings and book value multiples referencing similar multiples
of publicly traded peers. Goodwill is also reviewed whenever significant events
or changing circumstances indicate that an impairment issue may exist. Prior to
2002, goodwill relating to acquisitions completed before July 1, 2001 was
amortized on a systematic basis over periods not exceeding 40 years.
The Company records intangible assets representing the present value of
estimated future profits of insurance policies inforce related to businesses
acquired. These assets are recorded as the value of business acquired (VOBA),
and are included in other assets in the consolidated balance sheets. VOBA is
amortized over the related policy periods, up to 30 years. VOBA amortization
expense is recognized each period in proportion to the change in the present
value of expected gross profits, or in proportion to the recognition of premiums
related to the policies acquired, depending on the nature of the policies
acquired.
The cost of mutual fund investment management contracts acquired is
recorded as indefinite-lived intangible assets and are included in other assets
in the consolidated balance sheets. These management contract intangible assets
are not amortized; instead they are reviewed for impairment using a testing
regimen similar to that used for goodwill. Refer to Note 17 - Goodwill and Other
Intangible Assets for presentation of summarized financial information regarding
all of these intangible assets.
Separate Accounts. Separate account assets and liabilities reported in the
accompanying consolidated balance sheets represent funds that are administered
and invested by the Company to meet specific investment objectives of the
contractholders. Net investment income and net realized investment and other
gains (losses) generally accrue directly to such contractholders who bear the
investment risk, subject, in some cases, to principal guarantees and minimum
guaranteed rates of income. The assets of each separate account are legally
segregated and are not subject to claims that arise out of any other business of
the Company. Separate account assets are reported at fair value. Deposits, net
investment income and net realized investment and other gains (losses) of
separate accounts are not included in the revenues of the Company. Fees charged
to contractholders, principally mortality, policy administration and surrender
charges, are included in universal life and investment-type product charges.
Future Policy Benefits and Policyholders' Funds. Future policy benefits
for participating traditional life insurance policies are based on the net level
premium method. This net level premium reserve is calculated using the
guaranteed mortality and dividend fund interest rates, which range from 2.5% to
6.3%. The liability for annual dividends represents the accrual of annual
dividends earned. Settlement dividends are accrued in proportion to gross
margins over the life of the policies.
For non-participating traditional life insurance policies, future policy
benefits are estimated using a net level premium method on the basis of
actuarial assumptions as to mortality, persistency, interest and expenses
established at policy issue. Assumptions established at policy issue as to
mortality and persistency are based on the Company's experience, which, together
with interest and expense assumptions, include a margin for adverse deviation.
Benefit liabilities for annuities during the accumulation period are equal to
accumulated contractholders' fund balances and after annuitization are equal to
the present value of expected future payments. Interest rates used in
establishing such liabilities range from 2.5% to 9.5% for life insurance
liabilities, from 2.0% to 14.0% for individual annuity liabilities and from 1.1%
to 13.8% for group annuity liabilities.
131
JOHN HANCOCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (CONTINUED)
Note 1--Summary of Significant Accounting Policies - (continued)
Future policy benefits for long-term care insurance policies are based on
the net level premium method. Assumptions established at policy issue as to
mortality, morbidity, persistency, interest and expenses, which include a margin
for adverse deviation, are based on estimates developed by management. Interest
rates used in establishing such liabilities range from 6.0% to 8.5%.
Liabilities for unpaid claims and claim expenses include estimates of
payments to be made on reported individual and group life, long-term care, and
group accident and health insurance claims and estimates of incurred but not
reported claims based on historical claims development patterns.
Estimates of future policy benefit reserves, claim reserves and expenses
are reviewed continually and adjusted as necessary; such adjustments are
reflected in current earnings. Although considerable variability is inherent in
such estimates, management believes that future policy benefit reserves and
unpaid claims and claims expense reserves are adequate.
Policyholders' funds for universal life and investment-type products,
including guaranteed investment contracts and funding agreements, are equal to
the policyholder account values before surrender charges. Policy benefits that
are charged to expense include benefit claims incurred in the period in excess
of related policy account balances and interest credited to policyholders'
account balances. Interest crediting rates range from 3.0% to 8.0% for universal
life insurance products and from 1.1% to 13.8% for investment-type products.
Major components of policyholders' funds in the consolidated statements of
financial position, are summarized as follows:
December 31,
------------------------
2003 2002
--------- ---------
(in millions)
Liabilities for policyholders' funds
Guaranteed investment contracts .......................................... $ 4,770.2 $ 5,952.4
U.S. funding agreements .................................................. 144.3 143.4
Global funding agreements and Canadian institutional
annuities backing medium-term notes ................................... 12,679.8 12,495.9
Other investment-type contracts .......................................... 2,641.0 2,274.3
--------- ---------
Total liabilities for investment-type contracts .................... 20,235.3 20,866.0
Liabilities for individual annuities ........................................... 60.5 54.8
Universal life and other reserves .............................................. 2,432.3 2,133.6
--------- ---------
Total liabilities for policyholders' funds ..................................... $22,728.1 $23,054.4
========= =========
Global Funding Agreements and Canadian Institutional Annuities. The
Company's insurance subsidiaries have two distribution programs for global
funding agreements that back medium-term notes sold worldwide, and have a third
distribution program for Canadian institutional annuities that back medium-term
notes sold in Canada. Under these programs, global funding agreements and
annuities are purchased by special purpose entities (SPEs) that fund their
purchases of the global funding agreements and annuities with the proceeds from
their issuance of medium-term notes to investors. These SPEs pledge the global
funding agreements and annuities as security for the repayment of their
medium-term notes, but the notes are non-recourse to the Company and its
subsidiaries. Under the three distribution programs, as of December 31, 2003 and
2002, the Company had $12.9 billion and $12.5 billion, respectively, of global
funding agreements and annuities outstanding. These global funding agreements
and annuities are investment products that pay a stated rate of interest on the
principal amount and repay the principal at maturity. The global funding
agreements may not be terminated or surrendered prior to maturity. Claims for
principal and interest under these global funding agreements (which are issued
by the Life Company) are afforded equal priority to claims of life insurance and
annuity policyholders under the insolvency provisions of the Massachusetts
Insurance Laws. Claims under these institutional annuities (which are issued by
Maritime Life) are afforded equal priority to the claims of policyholders under
the provisions of Canada's Winding-Up and Restructuring Act. If a medium-term
note sold world-wide under the first two programs is denominated in a currency
different from the currency of the related global funding agreement or annuity,
the Company's U.S. insurance subsidiary also enters into a currency swap with
the SPE, and a third party, to match currencies. Similarly, the Company's U.S.
insurance subsidiary may enter into an interest rate swap with the SPE to match
the interest rate characteristics of the global funding agreement to those of
the related medium-term note. All medium-term notes issued under third program
in Canada are denominated in Canadian dollars, as are the institutional
annuities. The Company's Canadian insurance subsidiary enters into currency
swaps with third parties to hedge currency risk of the annuity payments.
132
JOHN HANCOCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (CONTINUED)
Note 1--Summary of Significant Accounting Policies - (continued)
Under the first program, established in May 1998 for $2.5 billion,
expanded to $7.5 billion in 1999, an SPE issued medium-term notes in Europe,
Asia and Australia. As of December 31, 2003 and 2002, there was $3.8 billion and
$3.8 billion, respectively, outstanding under this program. This SPE is
consolidated in the Company's financial statements. The medium-term notes issued
by this SPE are reported with global funding agreements in the Company's
consolidated balance sheets.
Under the second program, established in June 2000, for $5.0 billion,
expanded to $7.5 billion in 2001 and expanded again to $10.0 billion in 2002,
and expanded again to $12.5 billion in June 2003, an SPE issued medium-term
notes in Europe, Asia, and to institutional investors in the United States. As
of December 31, 2003 and 2002, there was $8.7 billion and $8.2 billion,
respectively, outstanding under this program. This SPE is a qualified special
purpose entity (QSPE) in accordance with SFAS No. 140 "Accounting for Transfers
and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities," and is
therefore not consolidated in the Company's financial statements. The funding
agreements backing the related medium-term notes are included in policyholders'
funds in the Company's consolidated balance sheets.
Under the third program, established in December 2001, for $1.0 billion
(Cdn $1.5 billion), an SPE issued medium-term notes to investors in Canada. As
of December 31, 2003 and 2002, there were $0.4 billion (Cdn $0.5 billion) and
$0.2 billion (Cdn $0.3 billion), respectively, outstanding under this program.
This SPE is also a QSPE and is therefore not consolidated in the Company's
financial statements. The annuity contracts backing the related medium-term
notes are included in policyholders' funds in the Company's consolidated balance
sheets.
At December 31, 2003, the annual contractual maturities of global funding
agreements and annuities backing medium term notes issued under these programs
were as follows: 2004--$2,198.6 million; 2005--$2,547.0 million; 2006--$2,884.5
million; 2007--$787.4 million; 2008--$1,640.0 million and thereafter--$2,860.6
million.
Participating Insurance. Participating business represents approximately
80.9%, 81.6%, and 76.6%, of the Company's life insurance in force, 96.2%, 96.3%,
and 98.1%, of the number of life insurance policies in force, and 94.3%, 92.5%
and 92.1%, of life insurance premiums in 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively.
The portion of earnings allocated to participating pension contractholders
and closed block policyholders that cannot be expected to inure to the Company
is excluded from net income and shareholders' equity.
The amount of policyholders' dividends to be paid is approved annually by
the Life Company's Board of Directors and separately for Maritime Life products
by the Maritime Life Board of Directors.
The determination of the amount of policyholders' dividends is complex and
varies by policy type. In general, the aggregate amount of policyholders'
dividends is related to actual interest, mortality, morbidity, persistency and
expense experience for the year, and is based on management's judgment as to the
appropriate level of statutory surplus to be retained by the Life Company. For
policies included in the closed block, expense experience is not included in
determining policyholders' dividends.
Revenue Recognition. Premiums from participating and non-participating
traditional life insurance and annuity policies with life contingencies are
recognized as income when due.
Premiums from universal life and investment-type contracts are reported as
deposits to policyholders' account balances. Revenues from these contracts
consist of amounts assessed during the period against policyholders' account
balances for mortality charges, policy administration charges and surrender
charges.
Premiums for contracts with a single premium or a limited number of
premium payments, due over a significantly shorter period than the total period
over which benefits are provided, are recorded in income when due. The portion
of such premium that is not required to provide for all benefits and expenses is
deferred and recognized in income in a constant relationship to insurance in
force or, for annuities, the amount of expected future benefit payments.
Premiums from long-term care insurance contracts are recognized as income
when due. Premiums from group life and health insurance contracts are recognized
as income over the period to which the premiums relate in proportion to the
amount of insurance protection provided.
133
JOHN HANCOCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (CONTINUED)
Note 1--Summary of Significant Accounting Policies - (continued)
Investment advisory, transfer agent, distribution and service fees are
recognized as revenues when services are performed. Commissions related to
security transactions and related expenses are recognized as income on the trade
date. Contingent deferred selling charge commissions are recognized as income in
the year received. Selling commissions paid to the selling broker/dealer for
sales of mutual funds that do not have a front-end sales charge are deferred and
amortized on a straight-line basis over periods not exceeding six years. This is
the approximate period of time expected to be benefited and during which fees
earned pursuant to Rule 12b-1 distribution plans are received from the funds and
contingent deferred sales charges are received from shareholders of the funds.
Stock-Based Compensation. The Company applied the recognition and
measurement provisions of Accounting Principles Board (APB) Opinion No. 25,
"Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees," and related interpretations in
accounting for stock-based compensation grants made prior to January 1, 2003.
Prior to January 1, 2003 the Company recognized compensation expense at the time
of the grant or over the vesting period for grants of non-vested stock to
employees and non-employee board members and grants of stock options to
non-employee general agents and has continued this practice. All options granted
under those plans had an exercise price equal to the market value of the
Company's common stock on the date of grant. Effective January 1, 2003, the
Company adopted the fair value provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards (SFAS) No. 123, "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation," and is
utilizing the transition provisions described in SFAS No. 148, on a prospective
basis to awards granted after December 31, 2002. The following table illustrates
the pro forma effect on net income and earnings per share if the Company had
applied the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS No. 123, to all
stock-based employee compensation.
Years Ended December 31,
------------------------------
2003 2002 2001
------------------------------
(in millions, except per share data)
Net income, as reported ....................................... $ 806.0 $ 499.5 $ 618.7
Add: Stock-based employee compensation expense included in
reported net income, net of related tax effects ............ 14.4 3.5 1.0
Deduct: Total stock-based employee compensation expense
determined under fair value method for all awards, net of
related tax effects (unaudited) ............................ 42.3 60.2 36.4
-------- -------- --------
Pro forma net income (unaudited) .............................. $ 778.1 $ 442.8 $ 583.3
======== ======== ========
Earnings per share
Basic:
As reported ............................................. $ 2.80 $ 1.71 $ 2.03
Pro forma (unaudited) ................................... 2.71 1.52 1.92
Diluted:
As reported ............................................. 2.79 1.70 2.01
Pro forma (unaudited) ................................... 2.69 1.51 1.90
Federal Income Taxes. The provision for Federal income taxes includes
amounts currently payable or recoverable and deferred income taxes, computed
under the liability method, resulting from temporary differences between the tax
basis and book basis of assets and liabilities. A valuation allowance is
established for deferred tax assets when it is more likely than not that an
amount will not be realized. Foreign subsidiaries and U.S. subsidiaries
operating outside of the United States are taxed under applicable foreign
statutory rates. Refer to Note 5-- Income Taxes for additional disclosures on
this topic.
Foreign Currency Translation. The assets and liabilities of operations in
foreign currencies are translated into United States dollars at current exchange
rates. Revenues and expenses are translated at average rates during the year.
The resulting net translation adjustments for each year are accumulated and
included in shareholders' equity. Gains or losses on foreign currency
transactions are reflected in earnings.
Severance. During 2003, the Company continued its ongoing Competitive
Position Project (the project). This project was initiated in the first quarter
of 1999 to reduce costs and increase future operating efficiency by
consolidating portions of the Company's operations and continued through early
2004. The project consists primarily of reducing staff in the home office and
terminating certain operations outside the Home Office.
Since the inception of the project as well as from similar initiatives
such as our information technology outsourcing and the sale of the home office
real estate, approximately 1,590 employees have been terminated or identified
for termination. Benefits paid since the inception of the project were $110.7
134
JOHN HANCOCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (CONTINUED)
Note 1--Summary of Significant Accounting Policies - (continued)
million through December 31, 2003. As of December 31, 2003 and 2002, the
liability for employee termination costs included in other liabilities was $12.0
million and $12.4 million, respectively. Employee termination costs, net of
related pension curtailment and other post employment benefit related gains, are
included in other operating costs and expenses and were $13.0 million, $19.2
million and $42.7 million for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001,
respectively. The total employee termination costs for year ended December 31,
2003 included an estimated $5.0 million for planned terminations related to our
information technology outsourcing.
Earnings per Share. Basic earnings per share is computed by dividing
income available to common shareholders by the weighted-average number of common
shares outstanding for the period excluding the dilutive effects of options, or
non-vested stock. Diluted earnings per share reflects the potential dilution
that could occur if dilutive securities, such as options and non-vested stock
grants, were exercised or converted into common stock or resulted in the
issuance of common stock that then shared in the earnings of the Company.
Cumulative Effect of Accounting Changes
FASB Derivatives Implementation Group Issue No. B36--Embedded Derivatives:
Modified Coinsurance Arrangements and Debt Instruments That Incorporate Credit
Risk Exposures That Are Unrelated or Only Partially Related to the
Creditworthiness of the Obligor under Those Instruments (DIG B36)
The Company adopted DIG B36 on October 1, 2003, which resulted in a
decrease in shareholders' equity of $66.3 million (net of tax of $35.7 million).
The Company recorded a reduction in net income of $166.2 million (net of tax of
$89.5 million) partially offset by an increase in other comprehensive income of
$99.9 million (net of tax of $53.8 million) which were recorded as the
cumulative effects of an accounting change, on October 1, 2003. For additional
discussion of DIG B-36, refer to the Recent Accounting Pronouncements section
below.
SFAS No. 87 - Employers' Accounting for Pensions
During the first quarter of 2001, the Company changed the method of
accounting for the recognition of deferred gains and losses considered in the
calculation of the annual expense for its employee pension plan under SFAS No.
87, "Employers' Accounting for Pensions," and for its postretirement health and
welfare plans under SFAS No. 106, "Employers' Accounting for Postretirement
Benefits Other Than Pensions." The Company changed the method of recognizing
gains and losses from deferral within a 10% corridor and amortization of gains
outside this corridor over the future working careers of the participants to
deferral within a 5% corridor and amortization of gains and losses outside this
corridor over the future working careers of the participants. The new method is
preferable because in the Company's situation, it produces results that respond
more quickly to changes in the market value of the plan assets while providing
some measure to mitigate the impact of extreme short term swings in those market
values. As a result, on January 1, 2001, the Company recorded a credit of $18.6
million (net of tax of $9.9 million), related to its employee benefit pension
plans, and a credit of $4.7 million (net of tax of $2.6 million) related to its
postretirement health and welfare plans. The total credit recorded as a
cumulative effect of an accounting change was $23.3 million (net of tax of $12.5
million), or $0.07 of diluted earnings per share for the year ended December 31,
2001. This change in accounting increased net income for the year ended December
31, 2001 by $4.4 million. The unaudited pro forma results for the years ended
December 31, 2001, assuming this change in accounting had taken place as of the
beginning of 2001, would not be materially different from the reported results.
SFAS No. 133 - Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging
Activities, as amended by SFAS No. 138, "Accounting for Certain Derivative
Instruments and Certain Hedging Activities", an amendment of FASB Statement No.
133
On January 1, 2001, the Company adopted SFAS No. 133, as amended by SFAS No.
138, "Accounting for Certain Derivative Instruments and Certain Hedging
Activities, an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133." The adoption of SFAS No.
133, as amended, resulted in a charge to operations accounted for as a
cumulative effect of accounting change of $16.1 million (net of tax of $8.3
million) as of January 1, 2001. In addition, as of January 1, 2001, a $227.6
million (net of tax of $122.6 million) cumulative effect of accounting change
was recorded in other comprehensive income for (1) the transition adjustment in
the adoption of SFAS No. 133, as amended, an increase of $40.5 million (net of
tax of $21.8 million), and (2) the reclassification of $12.1 billion in
securities from the held-to-maturity category to the available-for-sale
category, an increase of $187.1 million (net of tax of $100.8 million).
135
JOHN HANCOCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (CONTINUED)
Note 1--Summary of Significant Accounting Policies - (continued)
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
FASB Interpretation No. 46 (revised December 2003)--Consolidation of
Variable Interest Entities, an Interpretation of ARB No. 51
In December, 2003, the FASB re-issued Interpretation 46, "Consolidation of
Variable Interest Entities, an Interpretation of ARB No. 51," (FIN 46R) which
clarifies the consolidation accounting guidance of Accounting Research Bulletin
No. 51, "Consolidated Financial Statements," (ARB No. 51) to certain entities
for which controlling financial interests are not measurable by reference to
ownership of the equity of the entity. Such entities are known as variable
interest entities (VIEs).
Controlling financial interests of a VIE are defined as exposure of a
party to the VIE to a majority of either the expected variable losses or
expected variable returns of the VIE, or both. Such party is the primary
beneficiary of the VIE and FIN 46R requires that the primary beneficiary of a
VIE consolidate the VIE. FIN 46R also requires certain disclosures for
significant relationships with VIEs, whether or not consolidation accounting is
either used or anticipated. The consolidation requirements of FIN 46R apply as
of December 31, 2003 for entities considered to be special purpose entities
(SPEs), and otherwise will be applicable at March 31, 2004,
The Company has categorized its FIN 46R consolidation candidates into
three categories- 1) Collateral Debt Obligation funds we manage (CDO funds or
CDOs), which are SPEs, 2) low-income housing properties (the Properties) which
are not SPEs, and 3) assorted other entities (Other Entities) which are not
SPEs. The Company has determined that it should not consolidate any of the CDO
funds, therefore the adoption of FIN46R for the CDO funds had no impact on the
Company's consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
The Company is re-evaluating whether it should consolidate any of the Properties
based on FIN 46R, and is still evaluating the Other Entities, and is also
evaluating the future potential impact of consolidating any of them.
Additional liabilities recognized as a result of consolidating VIEs with
which the Company is involved would not represent additional claims on the
general assets of the Company; rather, they would represent claims against
additional assets recognized by the Company as a result of consolidating the
VIEs. Conversely, additional assets recognized as a result of consolidating
these VIEs would not represent additional assets which the Company could use to
satisfy claims against its general assets, rather they would be used only to
settle additional liabilities recognized as a result of consolidating the VIEs.
Refer to Note 3--Relationships with Variable Interest Entities for a more
complete discussion of the Company's relationships with VIEs, their assets and
liabilities, and the Company's maximum exposure to loss as a result of its
involvement with them.
Statement of Position 03-1 - Accounting and Reporting by Insurance
Enterprises for Certain Nontraditional Long Duration Contracts and for Separate
Accounts
On July 7, 2003, the Accounting Standards Executive Committee (AcSEC) of
the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) issued Statement
of Position 03-1, "Accounting and Reporting by Insurance Enterprises for Certain
Nontraditional Long Duration Contracts and for Separate Accounts" (SOP 03-1).
SOP 03-1 provides guidance on a number of topics unique to insurance
enterprises, including separate account presentation, interest in separate
accounts, gains and losses on the transfer of assets from the general account to
a separate account, liability valuation, returns based on a contractually
referenced pool of assets or index, accounting for contracts that contain death
or other insurance benefit features, accounting for reinsurance and other
similar contracts, accounting for annuitization benefits, and sales inducements
to contract holders.
SOP 03-1 will be effective for the Company's financial statements on
January 1, 2004. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of adopting SOP
03-1 on its consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash
flows.
SFAS No. 150 - Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with
Characteristics of Both Liabilities and Equity
In May 2003, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 150, "Accounting for Certain
Financial Instruments with Characteristics of Both Liabilities and Equity" (SFAS
No. 150). SFAS No. 150 changes the accounting for certain financial instruments
that, under previous guidance, issuers could account for as equity. It requires
that certain financial instruments be classified as liabilities on issuer
balance sheets, including those instruments that are issued in shares and are
mandatorily redeemable, those instruments that are not issued in shares but give
the issuer an obligation to repurchase previously issued equity shares, and
certain financial instruments that give the issuer the option of settling an
obligation by issuing more equity shares. The adoption of SFAS No. 150 had no
impact on the Company's consolidated financial position, results of operations
or cash flows.
136
JOHN HANCOCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (CONTINUED)
Note 1--Summary of Significant Accounting Policies - (continued)
SFAS No. 149 - Amendment of Statement No. 133 on Derivative Instruments
and Hedging Activities
In April 2003, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
No. 149, "Amendment of Statement No. 133 on Derivative Instruments and Hedging
Activities" (SFAS No. 149). SFAS No. 149 amends and clarifies financial
accounting and reporting for derivative instruments, including certain
derivative instruments embedded in other contracts, and for hedging activities
under Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 133, "Accounting for
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities" (SFAS No. 133). In particular,
SFAS No. 149 clarifies under what circumstances a contract with an initial net
investment meets the characteristic of a derivative, clarifies when a derivative
contains a financing component, amends the definition of an underlying to
conform it to language used in FASB Interpretation No. 45--"Guarantor's
Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, Including Indirect
Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others" and amends certain other existing
pronouncements. SFAS No. 149 was effective for contracts entered into or
modified after June 30, 2003 and for hedging relationships designated after June
30, 2003. The adoption of SFAS No. 149 had no impact on the Company's
consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
FASB Derivatives Implementation Group Issue No. B36--Embedded Derivatives:
Modified Coinsurance Arrangements and Debt Instruments That Incorporate Credit
Risk Exposures That Are Unrelated or Only Partially Related to the
Creditworthiness of the Obligor under Those Instruments
In April 2003, the FASB's Derivatives Implementation Group (DIG) released
SFAS No. 133 Implementation Issue No. B36, "Embedded Derivatives: Modified
Coinsurance Arrangements and Debt Instruments That Incorporate Credit Risk
Exposures That Are Unrelated or Only Partially Related to the Creditworthiness
of the Obligor under Those Instruments" (DIG B36). DIG B36 addresses whether
SFAS No. 133 requires bifurcation of a debt instrument into a debt host contract
and an embedded derivative if the debt instrument incorporates both interest
rate risk and credit risk exposures that are unrelated or only partially related
to the creditworthiness of the issuer of that instrument. Under DIG B36,
modified coinsurance and coinsurance with funds withheld reinsurance agreements
as well as other types of receivables and payables where interest and/or other
investment results are determined by reference to a specific pool of assets or a
total return debt index are examples of arrangements containing embedded
derivatives requiring bifurcation under SFAS No. 133. Under SFAS No. 133,
bifurcation requires that the embedded derivative be held at fair value and that
changes in fair value be charged or credited to income. The effective date of
DIG B36 was October 1, 2003.
On October 1, 2003, the Company adopted DIG B36 and determined that
certain of its reinsurance contracts and participating pension contracts contain
embedded derivatives. In accordance with DIG B36, the Company bifurcated each of
the contracts into its debt host and embedded derivative (total return swap) and
recorded the embedded derivative at fair value on the balance sheet with changes
in fair value recorded in income. In the case of the Company, DIG B36 results in
the establishment of derivative liabilities based on the fair value of all the
underlying assets of the respective contracts, including both the assets
recorded at amortized cost and the assets recorded at fair value on the balance
sheet. With respect to the underlying assets held at amortized cost, current
guidance does not permit adjustments to record the fair value of all of these
assets. However, the Company's implementation of DIG B36 required embedded
derivatives based on the fair value of those assets to be recorded in income.
The Company recorded derivative liabilities aggregating $255.7 million based on
the fair value of the assets underlying these contracts. Of this total
liability, $95.1 million related to assets held at amortized cost without any
adjustment recorded to recognize the change in the fair value of the asset.
Prior to the adoption of DIG B36, the Company had established, through other
comprehensive income, a reserve for its participating pension contracts to
recognize the impact on contractholder liabilities of the realization of
unrealized gains on assets backing those contracts. With the adoption of DIG
B36, this reserve is no longer required and is replaced by the recognition of
the fair value of the embedded derivative in income. The adoption of DIG B36
resulted in a decrease in shareholders' equity of $66.3 million (net of tax of
$35.7 million). The Company recorded a reduction in net income of $166.2 million
(net of tax of $89.5 million) partially offset by an increase in other
comprehensive income of $99.9 million (net of tax of $53.8 million) that were
recorded as the cumulative effects of an accounting change.
137
JOHN HANCOCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (CONTINUED)
Note 1--Summary of Significant Accounting Policies - (continued)
SFAS No. 148--Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation--Transition and
Disclosure, an amendment of FASB Statement No. 123
In December 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 148, "Accounting for
Stock-Based Compensation - Transition and Disclosure, an amendment of FASB
Statement No. 123." SFAS No. 148 provides alternative methods of transition for
a voluntary change to the fair value method of accounting for stock-based
employee compensation which is an optional alternative method of accounting
presented in SFAS No. 123, "Accounting for Stock Based Compensation." In
addition, SFAS No. 148 amends the disclosure requirements of SFAS No. 123 to
require more prominent disclosures in both annual and interim financial
statements about the method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation
and the effect of the method used on reported results. SFAS No. 148's amendment
of the transition and annual disclosure provisions of SFAS No. 123 is effective
for fiscal years ending after December 2002. The Company adopted the fair value
provisions of SFAS No. 123 on January 1, 2003 and utilized the transition
provisions described in SFAS No. 148, on a prospective basis to awards granted
after December 31, 2002. In 2003 the Company granted 638,000 stock options to
senior management and recorded $1.2 million, net of tax of $0.6 million, of
related compensation expense. The Company has adopted the disclosure provisions
of SFAS No. 148, see Note 1--Summary of Significant Accounting Policies,
Stock-Based Compensation above.
For the periods prior to January 1, 2003, Accounting Principles Board
Opinion (APB) No. 25, "Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees" was applied.
APB No. 25 provides guidance on how to account for the issuance of stock and
stock options to employees. Compensation cost for stock options, if any, is
measured as the excess of the quoted market price of the Company's stock at the
date of grant over the amount an employee must pay to acquire the stock. Under
APB No. 25, compensation cost is recognized over the requisite vesting periods
based on market value on the date of grant. APB No. 25 was amended by SFAS No.
123 to require pro forma disclosures of net income and earnings per share as if
a "fair value" based method was used.
FASB Interpretation No. 45--Guarantor's Accounting and Disclosure
Requirements for Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of
Others
In November 2002, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 45, "Guarantor's
Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, Including Indirect
Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others" (FIN 45). FIN 45 requires certain types of
guarantees to be recorded by the guarantor as liabilities, at fair value. This
differs from previous practice, which generally required recognition of a
liability only when a potential loss was deemed to be probable and was
reasonably estimable in amount. FIN 45 does not apply to guarantees that are
accounted for under existing insurance accounting principles. FIN 45 requires
more extensive disclosures of certain other types of guarantees, including
certain categories of guarantees which are already accounted for under
specialized accounting principles, such as SFAS No. 133, even when the
likelihood of making any payments under the guarantee is remote.
FIN 45's disclosure requirements are effective for financial statements of
interim or annual periods ending after December 31, 2002. Refer to Note
12--Commitments, Guarantees and Contingencies. Initial recognition and initial
measurement provisions are applicable on a prospective basis to guarantees
issued or modified after December 31, 2002. The adoption of FIN 45 had no impact
on the Company's consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash
flows.
SFAS No. 146--Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal
Activities
In June 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 146, "Accounting for Costs
Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities." SFAS No. 146 requires recognition
of a liability for exit or disposal costs, including restructuring costs, when
the liability is incurred rather than at the date of an entity's commitment to a
formal plan of action. SFAS No. 146 applies to one-time termination benefits
provided to current employees that are involuntarily terminated under the terms
of a one-time benefit arrangement. An ongoing benefit arrangement is presumed to
exist if a company has a past practice of providing similar benefits. SFAS No.
146 is effective for exit or disposal activities that are initiated after
December 31, 2002. The adoption of SFAS No. 146 had no impact on the Company's
consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
SFAS No. 142--Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
In January 2002, the Company adopted SFAS No. 142, "Goodwill and Other
Intangible Assets." SFAS No. 142 requires that goodwill and other intangible
assets deemed to have indefinite lives no longer be amortized against earnings,
but instead be reviewed at least annually for impairment. Intangible assets with
definite lives will continue to be amortized over their useful lives. The
Company has performed the required impairment tests of goodwill and management
contracts as of September 30, 2003, based on the guidance in SFAS No. 142. The
Company evaluated the goodwill and indefinite lived management contracts of each
138
JOHN HANCOCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (CONTINUED)
Note 1--Summary of Significant Accounting Policies - (continued)
reporting unit for impairment using valuations of reporting units based on
earnings and book value multiples and by reference to similar multiples of
publicly traded peers. No goodwill or management contract impairments resulted
from these required impairment tests.
EITF Issue 01-10--Accounting for the Impact of the Terrorist Attacks of
September 11, 2001
In September 2001, the FASB's Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) reached a
consensus on Issue 01-10, "Accounting for the Impact of the Terrorist Attacks of
September 11, 2001." Issue 01-10 presents guidance relative to accounting for
and financial reporting of the events of September 11, 2001 (the Events),
including both how and when to measure, record and report losses and any
resulting liabilities, which are directly attributable to the Events. Based on a
comprehensive review of the Company's operations, the Company believes that the
Events had no material financial impact on the Company's consolidated financial
position, results of operations or cash flows.
SFAS No. 141--Business Combinations
In June 2001, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141, "Business Combinations." SFAS
No. 141 requires that all business combinations be accounted for under a single
method, the purchase method. Use of the pooling-of-interests method is no longer
permitted. SFAS No. 141 also clarifies the criteria to recognize intangible
assets separately from goodwill, and prohibits the amortization of goodwill
relating to acquisitions completed after July 1, 2001. SFAS No. 141 is effective
for business combinations initiated after June 30, 2001. Adoption of SFAS No.
141 had no impact on the Company's consolidated financial position, results of
operations or cash flows.
EITF Issue No. 99-20--Recognition of Interest Income and Impairment on
Purchased and Retained Beneficial Interests in Securitized Financial Assets
In January 2001, the FASB's Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) reached a
consensus on Issue No. 99-20, "Recognition of Interest Income and Impairment on
Purchased and Retained Beneficial Interests in Securitized Financial Assets."
Issue 99-20 requires investors in certain asset-backed securities to record
changes in their estimated yield on a prospective basis and specifies evaluation
methods with which to evaluate these securities for an other-than-temporary
decline in value. The adoption of EITF 99-20 did not have a material financial
impact on the Company's consolidated financial position, results of operations
or cash flows.
Codification. In March 1998, the National Association of Insurance
Commissioners (NAIC) adopted codified statutory accounting principles
(Codification) effective January 1, 2001. Codification changes prescribed
statutory accounting practices and resulted in changes to the accounting
practices that the Company and its domestic life insurance subsidiaries use to
prepare their statutory-basis financial statements. The states of domicile of
the Company and its domestic life insurance subsidiaries have adopted
Codification as the prescribed basis of accounting on which domestic insurers
must report their statutory-basis results effective January 1, 2001. The
cumulative effect of changes in accounting principles adopted to conform to the
requirements of Codification is reported as an adjustment to surplus in the
statutory-basis financial statements as of January 1, 2001. Implementation of
Codification did not have a material impact on the Company's domestic life
insurance subsidiaries' statutory-basis capital and surplus, and these companies
remain in compliance with all regulatory and contractual obligations.
Related Party Transactions. Certain directors of the Company are members
or officers of other entities that periodically perform services for or have
other transactions with the Company. Such transactions are subject to bidding
procedures or are otherwise entered into on terms comparable to those that would
be available to unrelated third parties and are not material to the Company's
consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
The Company provides certain administrative and asset management services
to its pension plans and employee welfare trust (the Plans). Fees paid to the
Company for these services were $6.6 million, $7.7 million and $9.3 million
during the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively.
139
JOHN HANCOCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (CONTINUED)
Note 2--Investments
The following information summarizes the components of net investment
income and net realized investment and other gains (losses):
Years Ended December 31,
--------------------------------
2003 2002 2001
--------------------------------
(in millions)
Net investment income
Fixed maturities ......................................................... $3,492.9 $3,235.8 $2,890.8
Equity securities ........................................................ 43.7 30.7 49.1
Mortgage loans on real estate ............................................ 894.6 876.9 869.8
Real estate .............................................................. 69.2 82.3 76.4
Policy loans ............................................................. 128.9 125.1 123.9
Short-term investments ................................................... 4.3 10.5 72.6
Other .................................................................... (207.5) (193.2) 110.7
-------- -------- --------
Gross investment income .................................................. 4,426.1 4,168.1 4,193.3
Less investment expenses ................................................. 199.1 234.0 248.4
-------- -------- --------
Net investment income .............................................. $4,227.0 $3,934.1 $3,944.9
======== ======== ========
Years Ended December 31,
--------------------------------
2003 2002 2001
--------------------------------
(in millions)
Net realized investment and other gains (losses), net of related
amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs, amounts credited
to the policyholder dividend obligation and amounts credited to
participating pension contractholders
Fixed maturities ............................................................ $ (379.0) $ (652.9) $ (393.6)
Equity securities ........................................................... 71.1 94.2 164.6
Mortgage loans on real estate and real estate to be disposed of ............. 207.2 (7.3) (70.5)
Derivatives and other invested assets ....................................... 83.2 41.5 49.3
Amortization adjustment for deferred policy acquisition costs ............... (9.0) 34.6 26.4
Amounts credited to participating pension contractholders ................... 1.6 23.3 (42.3)
Amounts credited to the policyholder dividend obligation .................... 58.5 11.9 17.0
-------- -------- --------
Net realized investment and other gains (losses), net of related amortization
of deferred policy acquisition costs, amounts credited to the policyholder
dividend obligation and amounts credited to participating pension
contractholders .......................................................... $ 33.6 $ (454.7) $ (249.1)
======== ======== ========
Gross gains were realized on the sale of available-for-sale securities of
$638.7 million in 2003, $352.3 million in 2002 and $463.6 million in 2001, and
gross losses were realized on the sale of available-for-sale securities of
$243.6 million in 2003, $185.7 million in 2002, and $182.9 million in 2001.
140
JOHN HANCOCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (CONTINUED)
Note 2--Investments - (continued)
The Company's investments in held-to-maturity securities and
available-for-sale securities are summarized below for the years indicated:
December 31, 2003
-----------------------------------------------------
Gross Gross
Unrealized Unrealized
Amortized Cost Gains Losses Fair Value
-----------------------------------------------------
(in millions)
Held-to-Maturity:
Corporate securities .............................. $ 1,148.4 $ 21.4 $ 18.3 $ 1,151.5
Mortgage-backed securities ........................ 346.7 21.6 0.4 367.9
Obligations of states and political subdivisions .. 3.5 0.1 -- 3.6
---------------------------------------------------
Fixed maturities held-to-maturity total ........... $ 1,498.6 $ 43.1 $ 18.7 $ 1,523.0
===================================================
Available-for-Sale:
Corporate securities .............................. $38,640.2 $ 2,891.4 $ 310.2 $41,221.4
Mortgage-backed securities ........................ 7,578.0 292.6 144.6 7,726.0
Obligations of states and political subdivisions .. 426.0 17.8 1.4 442.4
Debt securities issued by foreign governments ..... 1,955.6 243.5 2.3 2,196.8
U.S. Treasury securities and obligations of U.S.
government corporations and agencies ........... 297.0 4.9 1.5 300.4
---------------------------------------------------
Fixed maturities available-for-sale total ......... 48,896.8 3,450.2 460.0 51,887.0
Equity securities ................................. 665.8 133.9 4.6 795.1
---------------------------------------------------
Total fixed maturities and equity securities
available-for-sale ............................. $49,562.6 $ 3,584.1 $ 464.6 $52,682.1
===================================================
December 31, 2002
-----------------------------------------------------
Gross Gross
Unrealized Unrealized
Amortized Cost Gains Losses Fair Value
-----------------------------------------------------
(in millions)
Held-to-Maturity:
Corporate securities .............................. $ 1,194.8 $ 32.3 $ 5.2 $ 1,221.9
Mortgage-backed securities ........................ 533.3 30.0 7.6 555.7
Obligations of states and political subdivisions .. 4.1 0.1 -- 4.2
---------------------------------------------------
Fixed maturities held-to-maturity total ........... $ 1,732.2 $ 62.4 $ 12.8 $ 1,781.8
===================================================
Available-for-Sale:
Corporate securities .............................. $35,564.9 $ 1,941.1 $ 1,182.3 $36,323.7
Mortgage-backed securities ........................ 7,178.4 394.1 271.0 7,301.5
Obligations of states and political subdivisions .. 312.8 24.2 -- 337.0
Debt securities issued by foreign governments ..... 1,487.9 178.4 2.9 1,663.4
U.S. Treasury securities and obligations of U.S.
government corporations and agencies ........... 211.0 10.9 0.2 221.7
---------------------------------------------------
Fixed maturities available-for-sale total ......... 44,755.0 2,548.7 1,456.4 45,847.3
Equity securities ................................. 624.7 85.1 37.5 672.3
---------------------------------------------------
Total fixed maturities and equity securities
available-for-sale ............................. $45,379.7 $ 2,633.8 $ 1,493.9 $46,519.6
===================================================
141
JOHN HANCOCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (CONTINUED)
Note 2--Investments - (continued)
The amortized cost and fair value of fixed maturities at December 31,
2003, by contractual maturity, are shown below:
Amortized Cost Fair Value
----------------------------
(in millions)
Held-to-Maturity:
Due in one year or less ........................ $ 3.9 $ 4.3
Due after one year through five years .......... 34.5 42.4
Due after five years through ten years ......... 252.9 259.7
Due after ten years ............................ 860.6 848.6
Mortgage-backed securities ..................... 346.7 368.0
--------- ---------
Total .................................... $ 1,498.6 $ 1,523.0
========= =========
Available-for-Sale:
Due in one year or less ........................ $ 2,201.2 $ 2,265.7
Due after one year through five years .......... 11,417.7 12,013.0
Due after five years through ten years ......... 14,852.1 15,981.6
Due after ten years ............................ 12,847.8 13,900.6
Mortgage-backed securities ..................... 7,578.0 7,726.1
--------- ---------
Total .................................... $48,896.8 $51,887.0
========= =========
Expected maturities may differ from contractual maturities because
eligible borrowers may exercise their right to call or prepay obligations with
or without call or prepayment penalties.
The change in net unrealized gains (losses) on trading securities that has
been included in earnings during 2003, 2002 and 2001 amounted to $5.8 million,
$(5.9) million, and $ (23.4) million, respectively.
The Company participates in a security lending program for the purpose of
enhancing income on securities held. At December 31, 2003 and 2002, $426.9
million and $625.5 million, respectively, of the Company's securities, at market
value, were on loan to various brokers/dealers, and were fully collateralized by
cash and highly liquid securities. The market value of the loaned securities is
monitored on a daily basis, and the collateral is maintained at a level of at
least 102% of the loaned securities' market value.
For 2003, 2002 and 2001, net investment income passed through to
participating pension contractholders as interest credited to policyholders'
account balances amounted to $161.7 million, $168.3 million, and $170.5 million,
respectively.
Depreciation expense on investment real estate was $3.1 million, $4.4
million, and $6.0 million in 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively. Accumulated
depreciation was $45.3 million and $56.6 million at December 31, 2003 and 2002,
respectively.
Analysis of unrealized losses on fixed maturity securities
The Company has a process in place to identify securities that could
potentially have an impairment that is other than temporary. This process
involves monitoring market events that could impact issuers' credit ratings,
business climate, management changes, litigation and government actions, and
other similar factors. This process also involves monitoring late payments,
downgrades by rating agencies, key financial ratios, financial statements,
revenue forecasts and cash flow projections as indicators of credit issues.
At the end of each quarter, our Investment Review Committee reviews all
securities where market value is less than ninety percent of amortized cost for
three months or more to determine whether impairments need to be taken. This
committee includes the head of workouts, the head of each industry team, the
head of portfolio management, the Chief Investment Officer and the Corporate
Risk Officer who reports to the Chief Financial Officer. The analysis focuses on
each company's or project's ability to service its debts in a timely fashion and
the length of time the security has been trading below cost. The results of this
analysis are reviewed by the Life Company's Committee of Finance, a subcommittee
of the Life Company's Board of Directors, quarterly. This quarterly process
includes a fresh assessment of the credit quality of each investment in the
entire fixed maturities portfolio.
142
JOHN HANCOCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (CONTINUED)
Note 2--Investments - (continued)
The Company considers relevant facts and circumstances in evaluating
whether the impairment of a security is other than temporary. Relevant facts and
circumstances considered include (1) the length of time the fair value has been
below cost; (2) the financial position of the issuer, including the current and
future impact of any specific events; and (3) the Company's ability and intent
to hold the security to maturity or until it recovers in value. To the extent
the Company determines that a security is deemed to be other than temporarily
impaired, the difference between amortized cost and fair value would be charged
to earnings.
There are a number of significant risks and uncertainties inherent in the
process of monitoring impairments and determining if an impairment is other than
temporary. These risks and uncertainties include (1) the risk that our
assessment of an issuer's ability to meet all of its contractual obligations
will change based on changes in the credit characteristics of that issuer, (2)
the risk that the economic outlook will be worse than expected or have more of
an impact on the issuer than anticipated, (3) the risk that fraudulent
information could be provided to our investment professionals who determine the
fair value estimates and other than temporary impairments, and (4) the risk that
new information obtained by us or changes in other facts and circumstances lead
us to change our intent to hold the security to maturity or until it recovers in
value. Any of these situations could result in a charge to earnings in a future
period.
As of December 31, 2003
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Less than 12 months 12 months or more Total
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Carrying Carrying Carrying
Value of Value of Value of
Securities Securities Securities
with with with
Unrealized Unrealized Unrealized Unrealized Unrealized Unrealized
Description of Securities: Loss Losses Loss Losses Loss Losses
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
US Treasury obligations and direct
obligations of U.S. government
agencies ............................. $ 274.4 $ (2.8) $ 1.5 -- $ 275.9 $ (2.8)
Federal agency mortgage backed
securities ........................... 1,220.6 (38.8) 991.7 $ (106.1) 2,212.3 (144.9)
Debt securities issued by foreign
governments .......................... 138.7 (2.3) -- -- 138.7 (2.3)
Corporate bonds ......................... 3,699.8 (111.4) 3,373.3 (217.3) 7,073.1 (328.7)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total debt securities ................... 5,333.5 (155.3) 4,366.5 (323.4) 9,700.0 (478.7)
Common stocks ........................... 83.3 (4.3) 7.7 (0.3) 91.0 (4.6)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total .............................. $5,416.8 $ (159.6) $4,374.2 $ (323.7) $9,791.0 $ (483.3)
===================================================================================
Gross unrealized losses from hedging adjustments represent the amount of
the unrealized loss that results from the security being designated as a hedged
item in a fair value hedge. When a security is so designated, its cost basis is
adjusted in response to movements in interest rates. These adjustments, which
are non-cash and reverse over time as the asset and derivative mature, impact
the amount of unrealized loss on a security. The remaining portion of the gross
unrealized loss represents the impact of interest rates on the non-hedged
portion of the portfolio and unrealized losses due to creditworthiness on the
total fixed maturity portfolio.
At December 31, 2003 the fixed maturity securities had a total gross
unrealized loss of $331.0 million excluding basis adjustments related to hedging
relationships. Of the total, $219.8 million is due to securities that have had
various amounts of unrealized loss for more than nine months. Of this, $49.8
million comes from securities rated investment grade. Unrealized losses on
investment grade securities principally relate to changes in interest rates or
changes in credit spreads since the securities were acquired. Credit rating
agencies' statistics indicate that investment grade securities have been found
to be less likely to develop credit concerns.
143
JOHN HANCOCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (CONTINUED)
Note 2--Investments - (continued)
As of December 31, 2003, $170.0 million of the $331.0 million gross
unrealized loss resides in below investment grade securities with various
amounts of unrealized loss for over nine months. All of these securities are
current as to the payments of principal and interest with the exception of 2
securities with a carrying value of $16.8 million and an unrealized loss of
$18.3 million. Of the total $170.0 million, $87.6 million traded above 80% of
amortized cost at December 31, 2003 and an additional $11.3 million traded above
80% of amortized cost within the last nine months, for a total of $98.9 million.
Of the total $98.9 million in this category, $58.1 million comes from airline
related bonds, an industry that continues to experience stress and hence has
lagged the general recovery. While we expect the secured nature of our positions
to protect our value, the increased stress in this industry is of concern.
The remaining portion of the unrealized loss, $71.1 million, arises from
below investment grade securities that have traded below 80 percent of amortized
cost for over nine months. All of these bonds are current on payments of
principal and interest and we believe, based on currently available information
that it is probable that these securities will continue to pay based on their
original terms. We carefully track these investments to ensure our continued
belief that their prices will recover.
Unrealized losses can be created by rising interest rates or by rising
credit concerns and hence widening credit spreads. Credit concerns are apt to
play a larger role in the unrealized loss on below investment grade bonds and
hence the gross unrealized loss on the portfolio has been split between
investment grade and below investment grade bonds in the above tables. The gross
unrealized loss on below investment grade bonds declined to $261.1 million at
December 31, 2003 primarily due to the easing of credit concerns and the
resulting spread tightening.
All sectors within the below investment grade portfolio saw a dramatic
drop in gross unrealized losses. Most notable was the drop in the gross
unrealized loss on the utility portfolio to $47.2 million as of December 31,
2003. While the overbuild in this sector will continue to pressure certain power
regions and certain companies for several years, the industry is in much better
shape after a year of sharply curtailed capital expenditures and general balance
sheet strengthening.
We remain most concerned about the airline sector. We lend to this
industry almost exclusively on a secured basis (approximately 99% of our loans
are secured). These secured airline financings are of two types: Equipment Trust
Certificates (ETC's) and Enhanced Equipment Trust Certificates (EETC's). The
ETC's initially have an 80% loan-to-value ratio and the EETC senior tranches
initially have a 40-50% loan-to-value and include a provision for a third party
to pay interest for eighteen months from a default. For us to lose money on an
ETC, three things must happen: the airline must default, the airline must decide
it does not want to fly our aircraft, and the aircraft must be worth less than
our loan. When lending to this industry, we underwrite both the airline and the
aircraft. We've been lending to this industry in this fashion for 25 years
through several economic cycles and have seen values on our secured airline
bonds fall and recover thorough these cycles. EETC's are classified as
asset-backed securities and they account for $58.6 million and $181.1 million of
the $144.9 million and $278.5 million of gross unrealized loss in the
asset-backed and mortgage-backed securities category as of December 31, 2003 and
December 31, 2002, respectively. While the airline industry is making positive
strides in reducing its cost structure, a significant recovery in this sector
requires a growing economy and a pick up in business travel. In the most recent
quarter ending December 31, 2003, most of the major carriers have reported
improved financial results. This trend is encouraging and we expect it to
continue barring any new terrorist events or a reversal of the course of the
U.S. economy. We do still expect that the senior secured nature of our loans to
this industry will protect our holdings through this difficult time.
Mortgage loans on real estate
Mortgage loans on real estate are evaluated periodically as part of the
Company's loan review procedures and are considered impaired when, based on
current information and events, it is probable that the Company will be unable
to collect all amounts of principal and interest due according to the
contractual terms of the loan agreement. The valuation allowance is based on the
present value of the expected future cash flows, discounted at the loan's
original effective interest rate, or is based on the collateral value of the
loan if the loan is collateral dependent. This level is believed adequate by
management to absorb estimated probable credit losses that exist at the balance
sheet date. Management's periodic evaluation of the adequacy of the allowance
for losses is based on the Company's past loan loss experience, known and
inherent risks in the portfolio, adverse situations that may affect the
borrower's ability to repay (including the timing of future payments), the
estimated value of the underlying collateral, composition of the loan portfolio,
current economic conditions and other relevant factors. This evaluation is
inherently subjective as it requires estimating the amounts and timing of future
cash flows expected to be received on impaired loans that may be susceptible to
significant change. Any change to the valuation allowance for mortgage loans on
real estate is reported as a
144
JOHN HANCOCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (CONTINUED)
Note 2--Investments - (continued)
component of net realized investment and other gains (losses). Interest received
on impaired mortgage loans on real estate is included in interest income in the
period received. If foreclosure becomes probable, the measurement method used is
based on the collateral value. Foreclosed real estate is recorded at the fair
value of the collateral at the date of foreclosure, which establishes a new cost
basis.
Changes in the allowance for probable losses on mortgage loans on real
estate and real estate to be disposed of are summarized below.
Balance at Balance at
Beginning of Year Additions Deductions End of Year
---------------------------------------------------------
Year ended December 31, 2003
Mortgage loans on real estate ... $ 62.0 $ 56.6 $ 52.4 $ 66.2
Real estate to be disposed of ... 2.8 0.6 3.4 --
--------------------------------------------------
Total ..................... $ 64.8 $ 57.2 $ 55.8 $ 66.2
==================================================
Year ended December 31, 2002
Mortgage loans on real estate ... $113.7 $ 7.8 $ 59.5 $ 62.0
Real estate to be disposed of ... 83.6 32.4 113.2 2.8
--------------------------------------------------
Total ..................... $197.3 $ 40.2 $172.7 $ 64.8
==================================================
Year ended December 31, 2001
Mortgage loans on real estate ... $ 83.6 $ 37.8 $ 7.7 $113.7
Real estate to be disposed of ... 43.5 46.0 5.9 83.6
--------------------------------------------------
Total ..................... $127.1 $ 83.8 $ 13.6 $197.3
==================================================
At December 31, 2003 and 2002, the total recorded investment in mortgage
loans that are considered to be impaired under SFAS No. 114, "Accounting by
Creditors for Impairment of a Loan," along with the related provision for losses
were as follows:
December 31, 2003
-------------------
2003 2002
-------------------
(in millions)
Impaired mortgage loans on real estate with provision for losses ..... $127.6 $ 61.0
Provision for losses ................................................. (37.5) (17.5)
-------------------
Net impaired mortgage loans on real estate ........................... $ 90.1 $ 43.5
===================
The average recorded investment in impaired loans and the interest income
recognized on impaired loans were as follows:
Years Ended December 31,
---------------------------
2003 2002 2001
---------------------------
(in millions)
Average recorded investment in impaired loans....... $ 94.3 $83.2 $81.5
Interest income recognized on impaired loans........ 3.4 5.0 8.4
The payment terms of mortgage loans on real estate may be restructured or
modified from time to time. Generally, the terms of the restructured mortgage
loans call for the Company to receive some form or combination of an equity
participation in the underlying collateral, excess cash flows or an effective
yield at the maturity of the loans sufficient to meet the original terms of the
loans.
145
JOHN HANCOCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (CONTINUED)
Note 2--Investments - (continued)
Restructured mortgage loans aggregated $87.8 million and $54.8 million as
of December 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively. The expected gross interest income
that would have been recorded had the loans been current in accordance with the
original loan agreements and the actual interest income recorded were as
follows:
Years Ended December 31,
--------------------------------
2003 2002 2001
--------------------------------
(in millions)
Expected................................... $ 7.6 $4.8 $ 24.3
Actual..................................... 7.2 4.7 23.0
At December 31, 2003, the mortgage portfolio was diversified by geographic
region and specific collateral property type as displayed below:
Geographic
Property Type Carrying Amount Concentration Carrying Amount
- ------------- --------------- ------------- ---------------
(in millions) (in millions)
Apartments.............................. $ 2,377.2 East North Central..................... $ 1,124.1
Hotels.................................. 475.6 East South Central..................... 414.3
Industrial.............................. 1,186.4 Middle Atlantic........................ 1,456.9
Office buildings........................ 2,725.3 Mountain............................... 513.9
Retail.................................. 2,341.6 New England............................ 874.0
Multi-Family............................ 27.3 Pacific................................ 2,390.4
Mixed Use............................... 286.4 South Atlantic......................... 2,390.5
Agricultural............................ 3,044.9 West North Central..................... 436.8
Other................................... 537.5 West South Central..................... 1,029.4
Canada/Other........................... 2,371.9
Allowance for losses.................... (66.2) Allowance for losses................... (66.2)
--------- ---------
Total............................. $12,936.0 Total............................ $12,936.0
========= =========
Mortgage loans with outstanding principal balances of $61.8 million, bonds
with amortized cost of $260.6 million and real estate with a carrying value of
$0.5 million were non-income producing for the year ended December 31, 2003.
Securitization activity
The Company originates commercial mortgages and sells them to Commercial
Mortgage Backed Securities Trusts (Trusts), and in certain cases, retains
servicing rights to the mortgages sold. These Trusts are QSPEs in accordance
with SFAS No. 140 and therefore, as transferor of financial assets to these
Trusts, the Company is prohibited from using consolidation accounting for its
relationships with them. During 2003, 2002 and 2001, the Company sold $529.8
million, $343.5 million, and $592.1 million of commercial mortgage loans in
securitization transactions, respectively, for which it received net proceeds of
$541.4 million, $345.2 million, and $596.0 million, respectively, from which it
recognized pre-tax gains of $12.0 million, $1.9 million, and $5.4 million,
respectively, and from which it retained servicing assets of $0.4 million, $0.3
million, and $1.5 million, respectively. The Company's mortgage servicing assets
were valued, in the aggregate, at $4.7 million and $5.1 million at December 31,
2003 and 2002, respectively.
During December, 2003, the Company securitized $277.6 million of corporate
bonds, most of which were below investment grade issues. All of the assets,
which were previously owned by the Company, were transferred to a trust,
Signature QSPE, Limited (the Trust), which the Company sponsored. The Trust is a
QSPE in accordance with SFAS No. 140, and as transferor of assets to the Trust,
the Company is prohibited from consolidating the Trust. The Company retained
$140.0 million of notes issued by the Trust which were rated A1, and which are
recorded as fixed maturities: available for sale on the consolidated balance
sheets, and the Company retained $12.7 million of equity issued by the QSPE,
which is unrated, and which is recorded in other invested assets on the
consolidated balance sheets. The Company received net proceeds of $124.9
million, representing the proceeds from sales of notes issued by the Trust to
unrelated parties, and the Company recorded a realized gain of $10.8 million on
these proceeds. The Company recognized no servicing assets as a result of this
securitization. All of the assets transferred from the Company to the trust were
performing assets; none of the transferred assets were delinquent or in default.
The Company values retained security interests in securitizations, at time
of issue and subsequently, using the same pricing methods as it uses for its
existing investment portfolio. Fair value prices are obtained from an
independent pricing service
146
JOHN HANCOCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (CONTINUED)
Note 2--Investments - (continued)
when available, and if not available are estimated by the Company by discounting
expected future cash flows using a current market rate applicable to the yield,
credit quality and maturity of the investments. Refer to Note 15 - Fair Value of
Financial Instruments below for further discussion of the Company's fair value
methodologies. The Company values servicing rights by estimating future cash
flows from the servicing assets using discount rates that approximate market
rates.
Equity method investments
Investments in other assets, which include unconsolidated joint ventures,
partnerships, and limited liability corporations, accounted for using the equity
method of accounting totaled $2,003.9 million and $1,444.4 million at December
31, 2003 and 2002, respectively. Total combined assets of such investments were
$15,800.4 million and $14,873.3 million (consisting primarily of investments),
and total combined liabilities were $2,146.6 million and $2,271.0 million
(including $1,216.3 million and $1,171.5 million of debt) at December 31, 2003
and 2002, respectively. Total combined revenues and expenses of these
investments in 2003 were $1,305.1 million and $1,054.3 million, respectively,
resulting in $250.8 million of total combined income from operations. Total
combined revenues and expenses in 2002 were $1,002.9 million and $1,212.3
million, respectively, resulting in $209.3 million of total combined loss from
operations. Total combined revenues and expenses in 2001 were $942.5 million and
$645.2 million, respectively, resulting in $297.3 million of total combined
income from operations. Depending on the timing of receipt of audited financial
statements of these other assets, the above financial data may be up to one year
in arrears. Net investment income on investments accounted for on the equity
method totaled $140.9 million, $66.8 million and $58.7 million in 2003, 2002,
and 2001, respectively.
Note 3--Relationships with Variable Interest Entities
The Company has relationships with various types of special purpose
entities (SPEs) and other entities, some of which are variable interest entities
(VIEs), in accordance with FIN 46R, as discussed in Note 1--Summary of
Significant Accounting Policies above. Presented below are discussions of the
Company's significant relationships with them, the Company's conclusions about
whether the Company should consolidate them, and certain summarized financial
information for these entities.
As explained in Note 1--Summary of Significant Accounting Policies above,
additional liabilities recognized as a result of consolidating VIEs in which the
Company is involved would not represent additional claims on the general assets
of the Company; rather, they would represent claims against additional assets
recognized by the Company as a result of consolidating the VIEs. These
additional liabilities are non-recourse to the general assets of the Company.
Conversely, additional assets recognized as a result of consolidating these VIEs
would not represent additional assets which the Company could use to satisfy
claims against its general assets, rather they would be used only to settle
additional liabilities recognized as a result of consolidating the VIEs.
Collateralized Debt Obligations (CDOs). Since 1996, the Company has acted
as investment manager to certain asset backed investment vehicles, commonly
known as collateralized debt obligations (CDOs). The Company also invests in the
debt and/or equity of these CDOs, and in the debt and/or equity of CDOs managed
by others. CDOs raise capital by issuing debt and equity securities, and use
their capital to invest in portfolios of interest bearing securities. The
returns from a CDO's portfolio of investments are used by the CDO to finance its
operations including paying interest on its debt and paying advisory fees and
other expenses. Any net income or net loss is shared by the CDO's equity owners
and, in certain circumstances where the Company manages the CDO, positive
investment experience is shared by the Company through variable performance
management fees. Any net losses are borne first by the equity owners to the
extent of their investments, and then by debt owners in ascending order of
subordination. Owners of securities issued by CDOs that are managed by the
Company have no recourse to the Company's assets in the event of default by the
CDO. The Company's risk of loss from any CDO it manages, or in which it invests,
is limited to its investment in the CDO.
In accordance with previous consolidation accounting principles (now
superceded by FIN 46R), the Company formerly consolidated a CDO only when the
Company owned a majority of the CDO's equity. The Company is now required to
consolidate a CDO when, in accordance with FIN 46R, the CDO is deemed to be a
VIE, and the Company is deemed to be the primary beneficiary of the CDO. For
those CDOs which are not deemed to be VIEs, the Company determines its
consolidation
147
JOHN HANCOCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (CONTINUED)
Note 3--Relationships with Variable Interest Entities - (continued)
status by considering the control aspects of the equity classes of the CDOs. The
Company has determined whether each CDO should be considered a VIE, and while
most are VIEs, some are not. The Company has determined that it is not the
primary beneficiary of any CDO which is a VIE, and for those that are not VIEs,
the Company does not have controlling financial interests. Therefore, the
Company will not use consolidation accounting for any of the CDOs which it
manages.
The Company believes that its relationships with its managed CDOs are
collectively significant, and accordingly provides, in the tables below, summary
financial data for the CDOs and data relating to the Company's maximum exposure
to loss as a result of its relationships with those entities. The Company has
determined that it is not the primary beneficiary of any CDO in which it invests
but does not manage and thus will not be required to consolidate any of those
entities, and considers that its relationships with them are not collectively
significant, therefore the Company has not disclosed data for them below. Credit
ratings are provided by credit rating agencies, and relate to the debt issued by
the CDOs in which the Company has invested.
December 31,
------------------------
2003 2002
------------------------
(in millions)
Total size of Company-Managed CDOs
Total assets ................................... $4,922.2 $6,220.9
======== ========
Total debt ..................................... 4,158.2 3,564.4
Total other liabilities ........................ 712.0 2,429.7
-------- --------
Total liabilities .............................. 4,870.2 5,994.1
Total equity ................................... 52.0 226.8
-------- --------
Total liabilities and equity ................... $4,922.2 $6,220.9
======== ========
December 31,
-------------------------------------------
2003 2002
-------------------------------------------
(in millions, except percents)
Maximum exposure of the Company to losses from
Company-Managed CDOs
Investments in tranches of Company-managed CDOs, by credit rating
(Moody's/Standard & Poor's):
Aaa/AAA ......................................................... $201.0 35.6% $380.2 53.8%
Aa1/AA+ ......................................................... 75.7 13.4 -- --
A3/A- ........................................................... -- -- 14.5 2.1
Baa2/BBB ........................................................ 218.0 38.8 218.0 31.0
Ba2/BB .......................................................... -- -- 7.0 1.0
B2 .............................................................. 8.0 1.4 -- --
B3/B- ........................................................... -- -- 6.0 0.8
Caa1/CCC+ ....................................................... 13.2 2.3 -- --
Not rated (equity) .............................................. 48.1 8.5 79.8 11.3
-------------------------------------------
Total Company exposure .......................................... $564.0 100.0% $705.5 100.0%
===========================================
Low-Income Housing Properties. The Company generates income tax benefits
by investing in apartment properties (the Properties) that qualify for low
income housing and/or historic tax credits. The Company invests in the
Properties directly, and also invests indirectly via limited partnership real
estate investment funds (the Funds), which are consolidated into the Company's
financial statements. The Properties are organized as limited partnerships or
limited liability companies each having a managing general partner or a managing
member. The Company is usually the sole limited partner or investor member in
each Property; it is not the general partner or managing member in any Property.
The Properties typically raise additional capital by qualifying for
long-term debt, which at times is guaranteed or otherwise subsidized by Federal
or state agencies, or by Fannie Mae. In certain cases, the Company invests in
the mortgages of the Properties, which are non-recourse to the general assets of
the Company. In the event of default by a mortgagee of a Property, the mortgage
is subject to foreclosure. Conversely, the assets of the Properties are not
available to satisfy claims against the general assets of the Company. No
Property in which the Company has been involved has undergone foreclosure. The
Company's
148
JOHN HANCOCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (CONTINUED)
Note 3--Relationships with Variable Interest Entities - (continued)
maximum loss in relation to the Properties is limited to its equity investment
in the Properties, future equity commitments made, and where the Company is the
mortgagor, the outstanding balance of the mortgages originated for the
Properties, and outstanding mortgage commitments the Company has made to the
Properties. The Company receives Federal income tax credits in recognition of
its investments in each of the Properties for a period of ten years and in some
cases, the Company receives distributions from the Properties which are based on
a portion of the actual cash flows.
The Company had previously determined that the Properties are VIEs in
accordance with FIN 46, as it was previously issued by the FASB, and that the
Company is not the primary beneficiary of any of them, so the Company did not
consolidate any of the Properties in the third fiscal quarter of 2003. However,
the Company is currently re-evaluating whether the Properties are VIEs, and
whether the Company is the primary beneficiary of any of them, in accordance
with FIN 46R. The Company believes that it is reasonably possible that it may be
required to consolidate one or more of the Properties. Accordingly the
disclosures in the tables below are provided. The table below presents summary
financial data for the Properties, and data relating to the Company's maximum
exposure to loss as a result of its relationships with them.
December 31,
--------------------
2003 2002
--------------------
(in millions)
Total size of the Properties(1)
Total assets ....................................... $982.7 $682.2
====================
Total debt ......................................... 576.3 396.4
Total other liabilities ............................ 116.6 101.8
--------------------
Total liabilities .................................. 692.9 498.2
Total equity ....................................... 289.8 184.0
--------------------
Total liabilities and equity ....................... $982.7 $682.2
====================
- ----------
(1) Certain data is reported with a one-year delay, due to the delayed
availability of financial statements of the properties.
December 31,
------------------
2003 2002
------------------
(in millions)
Maximum exposure of the Company to losses from the Properties
Equity investment in the Properties(1) ...................... $291.0 $177.0
Outstanding equity capital commitments to the Properties .... 108.2 139.4
Carrying value of mortgages for the Properties .............. 62.8 65.2
Outstanding mortgage commitments to the Properties .......... 5.1 5.1
------ ------
Total Company exposure ...................................... $467.1 $386.7
====== ======
- ----------
(1) Property level data as presented as of December 31, 2003 and 2002 is
reported with three and twelve month delays, respectively, due to the
delayed availability of financial statements of the Funds.
Other. The Company has investment relationships with a disparate group of
entities (Other Entities), which result from the Company's direct investment in
their debt and/or equity. This category includes energy investment partnerships,
investment funds organized as limited partnerships, and businesses which have
undergone debt restructurings and reorganizations. The Company is evaluating
whether each is a VIE, and considers it reasonably possible that it may
consolidate one or more of the entities or be required to disclose information
about them, as a result of adopting FIN 46R. The Company has made no guarantees
to any other parties involved with them, and has no further equity or debt
commitments to them. The Company's maximum exposure to loss as a result of its
relationships with the Other Entities is limited to its investment in them.
149
JOHN HANCOCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (CONTINUED)
Note 3--Relationships with Variable Interest Entities - (continued)
The table below presents summary financial data for the Other Entities,
and data relating to the Company's maximum exposure to loss as a result of its
relationships with them.
December 31,
-----------------------
2003 2002
-----------------------
(in millions)
Total size of the Other Entities (1)
Total assets ................................. $284.8 $281.8
====== ======
Total debt ................................... 301.7 309.3
Total other liabilities ...................... 65.3 62.1
------ ------
Total liabilities ............................ 367.0 371.4
Total equity(2) .............................. (82.2) (89.6)
------ ------
Total liabilities and equity ................. $284.8 $281.8
====== ======
- ----------
(1) Certain data is reported with up to a one-year delay, due to the delayed
availability of financial statements of the Other Entities.
(2) The negative equity results from the inclusion in the table of one of the
businesses mentioned above in the table. The business has an accumulated
deficit from operations predating the Company's equity investment in it,
but it is current on its debt service and is cash flow positive. The total
equity shown above has not been adjusted to remove the portion
attributable to other shareholders.
December 31,
------------------
2003 2002
------------------
(in millions)
Maximum exposure of the Company to losses from Other Entities (1)
Equity investment in Other Entities ............................. $ 53.1 $ 52.3
Outstanding equity capital commitments to the Other Entities .... 9.0 16.5
Debt investment in Other Entities ............................... 129.1 110.8
------ ------
Total Company exposure .......................................... $191.2 $179.6
====== ======
- ----------
(1) The Company's maximum exposure to loss is limited to its investments of
equity and debt securities of these entities, which are carried on the
Company's financial statements using the equity method of accounting, or
at amortized cost, and commitments to provide future equity and debt
capital.
Note 4--Derivatives and Hedging Instruments
The fair values of derivative instruments classified as assets at December
31, 2003 and 2002 were $815.9 million and $343.5 million, respectively, and
appear on the consolidated balance sheet in other assets. The fair values of
derivative instruments classified as liabilities at December 31, 2003 and 2002
were $1,277.3 million and $1,185.9 million, respectively, and appear on the
consolidated balance sheet in other liabilities. In addition, as a result of the
Company's adoption of SFAS No. 133 issue B36, "Embedded Derivatives: Modified
Coinsurance Arrangements and Debt Instruments That Incorporate Credit Risk
Exposures That Are Unrelated or Only Partially Related to the Creditworthiness
of the Obligor under Those Instruments" (DIG B36), the Company has recorded as
derivatives amounts aggregating $225.6 million as of December 31, 2003 related
to participating pension contracts which appears on the consolidated balance
sheet in policyholders' funds.
Fair Value Hedges. The Company uses interest rate futures contracts and
interest rate swap agreements as part of its overall strategies of managing the
duration of assets and liabilities or the average life of certain asset
portfolios to specified targets. Interest rate swap agreements are contracts
with a counterparty to exchange interest rate payments of a differing character
(e.g., fixed-rate payments exchanged for variable-rate payments) based on an
underlying principal balance (notional principal). The net differential to be
paid or received on interest rate swap agreements is accrued and recognized as a
component of net investment income.
The Company also manages interest rate exposure by using interest rate
swap agreements to modify certain liabilities, such as fixed rate debt and
Constant Maturity Treasuries (CMT) indexed liabilities, by converting them to a
LIBOR-based floating rate.
150
JOHN HANCOCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (CONTINUED)
Note 4--Derivatives and Hedging Instruments - (continued)
The Company enters into purchased interest rate cap agreements, cancelable
interest rate swap agreements, and written swaptions to manage the interest rate
exposure of options that are embedded in certain assets and liabilities. A
written swaption obligates the Company to enter into an interest rate agreement
on the expiration date contingent on future interest rates. Purchased interest
rate cap and floor agreements are contracts with a counterparty which require
the payment of a premium for the right to receive payments for the difference
between the cap or floor interest rate and a market interest rate on specified
future dates based on an underlying principal balance (notional principal).
Amounts earned on interest rate cap and floor agreements and swaptions are
recorded as an adjustment to net investment income.
The Company uses equity collar agreements to reduce its equity market
exposure with respect to certain common stock investments that the Company
holds. A collar consists of a written call option that limits the Company's
potential for gain from appreciation in the stock price as well as a purchased
put option that limits the Company's potential for loss from a decline in the
stock price.
Currency rate swap agreements are used to manage the Company's exposure to
foreign exchange rate fluctuations. Currency rate swap agreements are contracts
to exchange the currencies of two different countries at the same rate of
exchange at specified future dates. The net differential to be paid or received
on currency rate swap agreements is accrued and recognized as a component of net
investment income.
For the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2002, the Company recognized net
losses of $5.8 million and $19.5 million, respectively, related to the
ineffective portion of its fair value hedges, and net losses of $1.5 million and
$6.4 million, respectively, related to the portion of the hedging instruments
that were excluded from the assessment of hedge effectiveness. Both of these
amounts are recorded in net realized investment and other gains and losses.
Cash Flow Hedges. The Company uses forward starting interest rate swap
agreements to hedge the variable cash flows associated with future fixed income
asset acquisitions, which will support the Company's long-term care and life
insurance businesses. These agreements will reduce the impact of future interest
rate changes on the cost of acquiring adequate assets to support the investment
income assumptions used in pricing these products. During the periods in the
future when the acquired assets are held by the Company, the accumulated gain or
loss will be amortized into investment income as a yield adjustment on the
assets.
The Company also uses forward starting interest rate swap agreements to
hedge the variable cash flows associated with payments that it will make on
certain funding agreements issued by the company. Amounts are reclassified from
other comprehensive income as a yield adjustment when the payments are made.
For the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2002, the Company recognized
gains of $1.8 million and $7.2 million, respectively, related to the ineffective
portion of its cash flow hedges. These amounts are recorded in net realized
investment and other gains and losses. For the year ended December 31, 2003, all
of the Company's hedged forecast transactions qualified as cash flow hedges.
For the year ended December 31, 2003, a net gain of $2.7 million was
reclassified from other accumulated comprehensive income to earnings. It is
anticipated that approximately $5.2 million will be reclassified from other
accumulated comprehensive income to earnings within the next twelve months. The
maximum length for which variable cash flows are hedged is 24 years.
For the year ended December 31, 2003, none of the Company's cash flow
hedges were discontinued because it was probable that the original forecasted
transactions would not occur by the end of the originally specified time period
documented at inception of the hedging relationship.
The transition adjustment for the adoption of SFAS No. 133, as amended,
resulted in an increase in other comprehensive income of $23.0 million (net of
tax of $12.3 million) representing the accumulation in other comprehensive
income of the effective portion of the Company's cash flow hedges as of January
1, 2001. For the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2002, gains of $28.7 million
(net of tax of $15.5 million) and $175.4 million (net of tax of $94.5 million)
representing the effective portion of the change in fair value of derivative
instruments designated as cash flow hedges were added to accumulated other
comprehensive income, resulting in a balances of $223.3 million (net of tax of
$120.3 million) and $194.5 million (net of tax of $104.8 million), respectively.
Derivatives Not Designated as Hedging Instruments. The Company enters into
interest rate swap agreements, cancelable interest rate swap agreements, total
return swaps, interest rate futures contracts, credit default swaps and interest
rate cap and floor agreements to manage exposure to interest rates as described
above under Fair Value Hedges, without designating the derivatives as hedging
instruments.
151
JOHN HANCOCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (CONTINUED)
Note 4--Derivatives and Hedging Instruments - (continued)
In addition the Company used interest rate floor agreements to hedge the
interest rate risk associated with minimum interest rate guarantees in certain
of its life insurance and annuity businesses, without designating the
derivatives as hedging instruments.
The Company enters into equity indexed futures contracts and equity
indexed option contracts and equity swaps to generate investment return related
to equity indexed universal life insurance policies. For the years ended
December 31, 2003 and 2002 $3.0 million and $6.1 million, respectively, of
losses on these derivatives are included in benefits to policyholders and are
offset by crediting similar amounts to policyholders' accounts.
Note 5--Income Taxes
The Company files a life/non-life insurance company consolidated Federal
income tax return. The life insurance company sub-group includes three domestic
life insurance companies (John Hancock Life Insurance Company, (the Life
Company), John Hancock Variable Life Insurance Company and Investors Partner
Life Insurance Company) and a Bermuda life insurance company (John Hancock
Reassurance Company, Ltd.) that is treated as a U.S. company for Federal income
tax purposes. The non-life insurance company subgroup consists of John Hancock
Financial Services, Inc., John Hancock Subsidiaries, LLC and John Hancock
International Holdings, Inc.
In addition to taxes on operations, mutual life insurance companies are
charged an equity base tax (the surplus tax). The Life Company was a mutual life
insurance company for the entire year 1999, therefore it was subject to the
re-computation of its 1999 equity base tax liability in its 2000 tax return. The
surplus tax is determined by application of an industry-based earnings rate to
the Mutual Company's average equity base, as defined by the Internal Revenue
Code. The industry earnings rate is determined by the Internal Revenue Service
(IRS) and is not finalized until the subsequent year. As such, the financial
statements for the year ended December 31, 2001 include the impact of final tax
return adjustments related to the 1999 equity base tax.
Income before income taxes and cumulative effect of accounting changes
includes the following:
Years Ended December 31,
------------------------------
2003 2002 2001
------------------------------
(in millions)
Domestic ..................................... $1,161.5 $ 521.5 $ 760.2
Foreign ...................................... 187.4 114.7 65.9
-------- -------- --------
Income before income taxes and cumulative
effect of accounting changes .............. $1,348.9 $ 636.2 $ 826.1
======== ======== ========
The components of income taxes were as follows:
Years Ended December 31,
------------------------------
2003 2002 2001
------------------------------
(in millions)
Current taxes:
Federal ...................................... $ 154.0 $ 46.4 $ (38.6)
Foreign ...................................... 22.5 37.2 8.6
State ........................................ 4.6 4.6 4.6
-------- -------- --------
181.1 88.2 (25.4)
======== ======== ========
Deferred taxes:
Federal ...................................... 167.0 42.8 235.9
Foreign ...................................... 35.3 12.4 10.8
State ........................................ (6.7) (6.7) (6.7)
-------- -------- --------
195.6 48.5 240.0
-------- -------- --------
Total income taxes ........................... $ 376.7 $ 136.7 $ 214.6
======== ======== ========
152
JOHN HANCOCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (CONTINUED)
Note 5--Income Taxes - (continued)
A reconciliation of income taxes computed by applying the Federal income
tax rate to income before income taxes and the consolidated income tax expense
charged to operations follows:
Years Ended December 31,
---------------------------------
2003 2002 2001
---------------------------------
(in millions)
Tax at 35% .............................. $ 472.1 $ 222.7 $ 289.1
Add (deduct):
Surplus tax ............................ -- -- (13.4)
Prior year taxes ........................ 4.7 (6.6) 11.4
Tax credits ............................. (50.2) (36.4) (28.1)
Foreign taxes ........................... 1.4 2.0 1.3
Tax exempt investment income ............ (20.7) (35.6) (32.4)
Lease income ............................ (9.7) (25.5) (15.6)
Other ................................... (20.9) 16.1 2.3
------- ------- -------
Total income taxes ................ $ 376.7 $ 136.7 $ 214.6
======= ======= =======
The significant components of the Company's deferred tax assets and
liabilities were as follows:
December 31,
---------------------
2003 2002
---------------------
(in millions)
Deferred tax assets:
Policy reserve adjustments ........................... $ 562.9 $ 607.9
Dividends payable to policyholders ................... 99.6 135.2
Interest ............................................. 40.2 32.5
Other employee benefits .............................. 174.9 154.5
GAAP basis in excess of tax basis of investments ..... 217.7 233.4
Unearned premium ..................................... 275.8 182.8
Other ................................................ 241.0 --
-------- --------
Total deferred tax assets ...................... $1,612.1 $1,346.3
Deferred tax liabilities:
Deferred policy acquisition costs .................... 1,237.2 1,087.6
Pension plan expense ................................. 49.1 76.0
Depreciation ......................................... 68.5 19.4
Basis in partnerships ................................ 72.6 65.1
Market discount on bonds ............................. 20.0 18.9
Lease income ......................................... 1,041.4 772.7
Goodwill ............................................. 34.5 80.3
Unrealized gains ..................................... 826.7 226.1
Capitalized charges related to mutual funds .......... 3.0 12.7
Other ................................................ -- 19.1
-------- --------
Total deferred tax liabilities ................. 3,353.0 2,377.9
-------- --------
Net deferred tax liabilities ................... $1,740.9 $1,031.6
======== ========
The Company made income tax payments of $177.2 million, $65.2 million and
$1.7 million in 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively.
153
JOHN HANCOCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (CONTINUED)
Note 6--Closed Block
As of February 1, 2000, the Company established a closed block for the
benefit of certain classes of individual or joint traditional participating
whole life insurance policies for which the Company had a dividend scale payable
in 1999 and individual term life insurance policies that were in force on
February 1, 2000. Assets were allocated to the closed block in an amount that,
together with anticipated revenues from policies included in the closed block,
was reasonably expected to be sufficient to support such business, including
provision for payment of benefits, direct asset acquisition and disposition
costs, and taxes, and for continuation of dividend scales payable in 1999,
assuming experience underlying such dividend scales continues. Assets allocated
to the closed block inure solely to the benefit of the holders of the policies
included in the closed block and will not revert to the benefit of the
shareholders of the Company. No reallocation, transfer, borrowing, or lending of
assets can be made between the closed block and other portions of the Company's
general account, any of its separate accounts, or any affiliate of the Company
without prior approval of the Massachusetts Division of Insurance.
If, over time, the aggregate performance of the closed block assets and
policies is better than was assumed in funding the closed block, dividends to
policyholders will be increased. If, over time, the aggregate performance of the
closed block assets and policies is less favorable than was assumed in the
funding, dividends to policyholders could be reduced.
The assets and liabilities allocated to the closed block are recorded in
the Company's financial statements on the same basis as other similar assets and
liabilities. The carrying amount of closed block liabilities in excess of the
carrying amount of closed block assets at the date of demutualization (adjusted
to eliminate the impact of related amounts in accumulated other comprehensive
income) represents the maximum future earnings from the assets and liabilities
designated to the closed block that can be recognized in income over the period
the policies in the closed block remain in force. The Company has developed an
actuarial calculation of the timing of such maximum future shareholder earnings,
and this is the basis of the policyholder dividend obligation.
If actual cumulative earnings are greater than expected cumulative
earnings, only expected earnings will be recognized in income. Actual cumulative
earnings in excess of expected cumulative earnings represents undistributed
accumulated earnings attributable to policyholders, which are recorded as a
policyholder dividend obligation because the excess will be paid to closed block
policyholders as an additional policyholder dividend unless otherwise offset by
future performance of the closed block that is less favorable than originally
expected. If actual cumulative performance is less favorable than expected, only
actual earnings will be recognized in income.
The principal cash flow items that affect the amount of closed block
assets and liabilities are premiums, net investment income, purchases and sales
of investments, policyholders' benefits, policyholder dividends, premium taxes,
guaranty fund assessments, and income taxes. The principal income and expense
items excluded from the closed block are management and maintenance expenses,
commissions and net investment income and realized investment gains and losses
of investment assets outside the closed block that support the closed block
business, all of which enter into the determination of total gross margins of
closed block policies for the purpose of the amortization of deferred
acquisition costs. The amounts shown in the following tables for assets,
liabilities, revenues and expenses of the closed block are those that enter into
the determination of amounts that are to be paid to policyholders.
154
JOHN HANCOCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (CONTINUED)
Note 6--Closed Block - (continued)
The following tables set forth certain summarized financial information
relating to the closed block as of the dates indicated:
December 31,
----------------------
2003 2002
----------------------
(in millions)
Liabilities
Future policy benefits ................................................................... $10,690.6 $10,509.0
Policyholder dividend obligation ......................................................... 400.0 288.9
Policyholders' funds ..................................................................... 1,511.9 1,504.0
Policyholder dividends payable ........................................................... 413.1 432.3
Other closed block liabilities ........................................................... 37.4 111.7
--------- ---------
Total closed block liabilities ................................................... $13,053.0 $12,845.9
========= =========
Assets
Investments
Fixed maturities:
Held-to-maturity--at amortized cost (fair value: 2003--$69.6; 2002--$97.1) ........... $ 66.0 $ 86.0
Available-for-sale--at fair value (cost: 2003--$5,847.6; 2002--$5,580.2) .............. 6,271.1 5,823.2
Equity securities:
Available-for-sale--at fair value (cost: 2003--$9.1; 2002--$10.5) ..................... 9.1 12.4
Mortgage loans on real estate ............................................................ 1,577.9 1,665.8
Policy loans ............................................................................. 1,554.0 1,555.1
Short-term investments ................................................................... 1.2 25.2
Other invested assets .................................................................... 230.6 212.4
--------- ---------
Total investments ................................................................ 9,709.9 9,380.1
========= =========
Cash and cash equivalents ................................................................ 248.3 244.0
Accrued investment income ................................................................ 145.1 156.3
Other closed block assets ................................................................ 308.6 327.6
--------- ---------
Total closed block assets ........................................................ $10,411.9 $10,108.0
========= =========
Excess of reported closed block liabilities over assets designated to the closed block ... $ 2,641.1 $ 2,737.9
Portion of above representing other comprehensive income:
Unrealized appreciation (depreciation), net of tax of $(148.0) million
and $(84.0) million at 2003 and 2002, respectively ............................... 275.3 155.9
Allocated to the policyholder dividend obligation, net of tax
$148.1 million and $88.8 million at 2003 and 2002, respectively .................. (275.1) (164.9)
--------- ---------
Total ............................................................................ 0.2 (9.0)
--------- ---------
Maximum future earnings to be recognized from closed
block assets and liabilities .................................................. $ 2,641.3 $ 2,728.9
========= =========
Change in the policyholder dividend obligation:
Balance at beginning of period ........................................................ $ 288.9 $ 251.2
Impact on net income before income taxes ................................................. (57.9) (70.8)
Unrealized investment gains (losses) ..................................................... 169.0 108.5
--------- ---------
Balance at end of period ......................................................... $ 400.0 $ 288.9
========= =========
155
JOHN HANCOCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (CONTINUED)
Note 6--Closed Block - (continued)
Year Ended December 31,
---------------------------------
2003 2002 2001
---------------------------------
(in millions)
Revenues
Premiums ................................................................. $ 915.7 $ 969.9 $ 940.0
Net investment income .................................................... 648.2 663.9 667.5
Net realized investment and other gains (losses), net of amounts
credited to the policyholder dividend obligation of $(58.2) million,
$(11.9) million and $(17.0) million, respectively ..................... (4.5) (5.2) (3.6)
Other closed block revenues .............................................. (0.1) 0.1 0.6
-------- -------- --------
Total closed block revenues ........................................ 1,559.3 1,628.7 1,604.5
======== ======== ========
Benefits and Expenses
Benefits to policyholders ................................................ 982.0 1,057.6 924.4
Change in the policyholder dividend obligation ........................... (2.4) (60.2) 54.9
Other closed block operating costs and expenses .......................... (3.0) (5.2) (6.3)
Dividends to policyholders ............................................... 449.5 489.7 474.9
-------- -------- --------
Total benefits and expenses .............................................. 1,426.1 1,481.9 1,447.9
======== ======== ========
Closed block revenues, net of closed block benefits and expenses,
before income taxes and cumulative effect
of accounting change ............................................. 133.2 146.8 156.6
Income taxes, net of amounts credited to the policyholder dividend
obligation of $2.1 million, $1.3 million and $4.6
million, respectively ............................................ 45.6 50.0 53.0
-------- -------- --------
Closed block revenues, net of closed block benefits and expenses
and income taxes, before cumulative effect of accounting
change ........................................................... 87.6 96.8 103.6
Cumulative effect of accounting change, net of tax ....................... -- -- (1.4)
-------- -------- --------
Closed block revenues, net of closed block benefits and expenses,
income taxes and the cumulative effect of accounting change ...... $ 87.6 $ 96.8 $ 102.2
======== ======== ========
Maximum future earnings from closed block assets and liabilities:
Years Ended December 31,
------------------------
2003 2002
---- ----
(in millions)
Beginning of period .................... $2,728.9 $2,825.7
End of period .......................... 2,641.3 2,728.9
-------- --------
Change during period ................... $ (87.6) $ (96.8)
======== ========
156
JOHN HANCOCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (CONTINUED)
Note 7--Debt and Line of Credit
Short-term and long-term debt consists of the following:
December 31,
--------------------
2003 2002
--------------------
(in millions)
Short-term debt:
Commercial paper ....................................................... $ 381.3 $ 249.4
Current maturities of long-term debt ................................... 104.0 99.5
-------- --------
Total short-term debt ............................................ 485.3 348.9
-------- --------
Long-term debt:
Surplus Notes, 7.38%, maturing in 2024 ................................. 447.6 447.4
Bonds payable, 5.625%, maturing in 2008 ................................ 499.0 498.8
Notes payable, interest ranging from 6.496% to 12.0%, due in varying
amounts to 2011 ..................................................... 472.9 489.8
-------- --------
Total long-term debt ............................................. 1,419.5 1,436.0
Less current maturities ................................................... (104.0) (99.5)
-------- --------
Long-term debt ............................................................ 1,315.5 1,336.5
-------- --------
Total long and short-term debt before fair value adjustments .............. 1,800.8 1,685.4
Fair value adjustments related to interest rate swaps(1) .................. 94.5 113.8
-------- --------
Total long and short-term debt after fair value adjustments ............... $1,895.3 $1,799.2
======== ========
Consumer notes:
Notes payable, interest ranging from 1.75% to 6.25%, due in varying
amounts to 2032 ..................................................... $1,550.4 $ 290.2
======== ========
- ----------
(1) As part of its interest rate management, the Company uses interest rate
swaps to convert the interest expense on the Surplus Notes from fixed to
variable. Under SFAS No. 133, these swaps are designated as fair value
hedges, which results in the carrying value of the notes being adjusted
for changes in fair value.
The Company issues commercial paper primarily to meet working capital
needs. The Company had commercial paper with a book value of $381.3 million and
a face value of $382.0 million outstanding at December 31, 2003. The
weighted-average interest rate for outstanding commercial paper at December 31,
2003 was 1.18%. The weighted-average life for outstanding commercial paper at
December 31, 2003 was approximately 33 days. Commercial paper borrowing
arrangements are supported by a syndicated line of credit. The Company had
commercial paper with a book value of $249.4 million and a face value of $250.0
million outstanding at December 31, 2002. The weighted-average interest rate for
outstanding commercial paper at December 31, 2002 was 1.52%. The
weighted-average life for outstanding commercial paper at December 31, 2002 was
approximately 29 days.
The issuance of Surplus Notes by the Life Company was approved by the
Massachusetts Commissioner of Insurance, and any payment of interest or
principal on the Surplus Notes requires the prior approval of the Massachusetts
Commissioner of Insurance. The bonds payable consist of 7-year senior unsecured
registered notes at a coupon of 5.625% issued by the parent insurance holding
company, JHFS, with the proceeds used for general corporate purposes. The
issuance of bonds payable was made pursuant to a $1.0 billion effective shelf
registration statement. The notes payable consists of debt issued by various
operating subsidiaries of the Company of which $304.7 million was outstanding at
December 31, 2003 at John Hancock Canadian Corporation, a subsidiary of the
Company, and is fully guaranteed by the Company.
At December 31, 2003, the Company had a committed line of credit through a
group of banks including Fleet National Bank, JPMorgan Chase, Citicorp USA,
Inc., The Bank of New York, The Bank of Nova Scotia, Fleet Securities, Inc. and
JPMorgan Securities, Inc., totaling $1.0 billion, $500.0 million pursuant to a
364-day commitment (renewed effective July 25, 2003), and $500.0 million
pursuant to a multi-year facility (renewable in 2005). The banks will commit,
when requested, to loan funds at prevailing interest rates as determined in
accordance with the line of credit agreement. Under the terms of the agreement,
the Company is required to maintain certain minimum levels of net worth and
comply with certain other covenants, which were met at December 31, 2003. At
December 31, 2003, the Company had no outstanding borrowings under the
agreement.
Aggregate maturities of long-term debt are as follows: 2004--$104.0
million; 2005--$28.5 million; 2006--$16.8 million; 2007--$9.6 million; 2008--
$500.9 million; and thereafter--$759.7 million.
157
JOHN HANCOCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (CONTINUED)
Note 7--Debt and Line of Credit - (continued)
Interest expense on debt, included in other operating costs and expenses,
was $99.4 million, $98.6 million and $70.3 million in 2003, 2002 and 2001,
respectively. Interest paid amounted to $96.2 million in 2003, $89.6 million in
2002, and $65.3 million in 2001.
Consumer Notes. The Life Company issues consumer notes through its
SignatureNotes program. SignatureNotes is an investment product sold through a
broker-dealer network to retail customers in the form of publicly traded fixed
and/or floating rate securities. SignatureNotes are issued weekly with a variety
of maturities, interest rates, and call provisions. SignatureNotes may be
redeemed upon the death of the holder, subject to an annual overall program
redemption limitation of 1% of the aggregate securities outstanding, or
$1,000,000, or an individual redemption limitation of $200,000 of aggregate
principal.
Aggregate maturities of consumer notes, gross of unamortized dealer fees,
are as follows: 2005--$22.1 million; 2006--$63.5 million; 2007--$99.0 million;
2008--$68.4 million; and thereafter--$1,327.7 million. As of December 31, 2003,
there are no scheduled maturities of consumer notes in 2004.
Interest expense on consumer notes, included in benefits to policyholders,
was $39.0 million in 2003 and $2.5 million in 2002. No interest expense was
incurred in 2001. Interest paid amounted to $29.8 million in 2003 and $1.4
million in 2002. No interest was paid in 2001.
Note 8 -- Sale/Leaseback Transaction and Other Lease Obligations
On March 14, 2003, the Company sold three of its Home Office complex
properties to Beacon Capital Partners for $910.0 million. As part of the
transaction, the Company entered into a long-term lease of the space it now
occupies in those buildings and plans on continuing to use them as its corporate
headquarters. As a result of the sale-leaseback transaction, the Company
recognized a current realized gain of $233.8 million and a deferred profit of
$247.7 million. A capital lease obligation of $90.0 million was recorded for one
of the properties, which has a 15 year market-based lease term. The other two
properties have operating market-based leases which range from 5 to 12 years.
The Company also provided Beacon Capital Partners with a long-term sublease on
the Company's parking garage.
The future minimum lease payments by year and in the aggregate, under
the capital lease and under non-cancelable operating leases and future sublease
rental income on the garage are presented below:
Non-cancelable Sublease
Capital Operating Rental
Lease Leases Income
--------------------------------------
(in millions)
2004 ............................................... $ 8.8 $ 42.1 $ 1.3
2005 ............................................... 8.8 42.0 1.3
2006 ............................................... 8.8 42.0 1.3
2007 ............................................... 8.8 37.1 1.3
2008 ............................................... 8.8 34.1 1.3
Thereafter ......................................... 88.6 154.6 77.2
------ ------ ------
Total minimum lease payments ....................... 132.6 $351.9 $ 83.7
====== ======
Amounts representing interest ...................... (46.3)
------
Present value of net minimum lease payments ........ 86.3
Current portion of capital lease obligation ........ (8.8)
------
Total .............................................. $ 77.5
======
158
JOHN HANCOCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (CONTINUED)
Note 9--Minority Interests
Minority interests consist of preferred stock issued by Maritime Life and
an outside equity interest in a consolidated investment partnership. The assets,
liabilities, revenues, expenses and earnings of Maritime Life and the investment
partnership are consolidated in the Company's financial statements.
In 1986, Maritime Life issued $25.3 million of Series A Cumulative
Redeemable Preferred Stock (Preferred Stock). Dividends on the Preferred Stock
are payable quarterly at 18% of the average of two prime rates of two specified
Canadian banks. The Preferred Stock is nonvoting and redeemable at Maritime
Life's sole option at a price of Cdn. $25 per preferred share.
On November 19, 1999, Maritime Life issued $68.2 million of Non-Cumulative
Redeemable Second Preferred Shares, Series 1 (Series 1 Preferred Shares) at a
price of Cdn. $25 per preferred share. Dividends on the Series 1 Preferred
Shares are payable quarterly, through December 31, 2004, at a rate of Cdn.
$0.38125 per preferred share. Commencing on January 1, 2005, the Series 1
Preferred Shares dividends will be calculated by applying Cdn. $25 to the
greater of 90% of the prime rate and 5.85% per annum, calculated quarterly. The
Series 1 Preferred Shares are nonvoting and redeemable at Maritime Life's sole
option any time after December 31, 2004 at a price of Cdn. $25.50 plus all
declared and unpaid dividends. In addition, shareholders as of December 31, 2004
have the option to convert their Series 1 Preferred Shares to Non-Cumulative
Redeemable Second Preferred Shares, Series 2 (Series 2 Preferred Shares). The
Series 2 Preferred Shares will have a dividend rate of not less than 95% of the
yield of certain bonds of the Government of Canada.
On December 13, 2002, Maritime Life issued $61.8 million of Non-Cumulative
Redeemable Second Preferred Shares, Series 3 (Series 3 Preferred Shares) at a
price of Cdn. $25 per share. Dividends on the Series 3 Preferred Shares are
payable quarterly, through December 31, 2007, at a rate of Cdn. $0.38125 per
preferred share, or 6.1% per annum. The Series 3 Preferred Shares are nonvoting
and redeemable at Maritime Life's sole option any time on or after December 31,
2007 at Cdn. $26 per preferred share, on or after December 31, 2008 at Cdn.
$25.75 per preferred share, on or after December 31, 2009 at Cdn. $25.50 per
preferred share, on or after December 31, 2010 at Cdn. $25.25 per preferred
share and on or after December 31, 2011 at Cdn. $25.00 per preferred share.
The minority interest in the equity of the consolidated investment
partnership reflects the original equity investment by minority investors in the
consolidated investment partnership, along with their proportional share of the
results of operations of the partnership.
159
JOHN HANCOCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (CONTINUED)
Note 10--Reinsurance
The effect of reinsurance on life, health and annuity premiums written and
earned was as follows:
2003 Premiums 2002 Premiums 2001 Premiums
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Written Earned Written Earned Written Earned
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(in millions)
Direct................................. $4,274.4 $4,271.6 $3,625.1 $3,620.7 $4,086.5 $4,090.4
Assumed................................ 693.0 693.0 471.2 471.2 429.9 429.9
Ceded.................................. (816.9) (816.9) (714.8) (714.8) (669.0) (669.0)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net life, health and annuity premiums........ $4,150.5 $4,147.7 $3,381.5 $3,377.1 $3,847.4 $3,851.3
=====================================================================================
For the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001, benefits to
policyholders under life, health and annuity ceded reinsurance contracts were
$541.6 million, $755.5 million and $527.0 million, respectively.
On February 28, 1997, the Company sold a major portion of its group
insurance business to UNICARE Life & Health Insurance Company (UNICARE), a
wholly owned subsidiary of WellPoint Health Networks, Inc. The business sold
included the Company's group accident and health business and related group life
business and Cost Care, Inc., Hancock Association Services Group and Tri-State,
Inc., all of which were indirect wholly-owned subsidiaries of the Company. The
Company retained its group long-term care operations. The insurance business
sold was transferred to UNICARE through a 100% coinsurance agreement. The
Company remains liable to its policyholders to the extent that UNICARE does not
meet its contractual obligations under the coinsurance agreement.
Through the Company's group health insurance operations, the Company
entered into a number of reinsurance arrangements in respect of personal
accident insurance and the occupational accident component of workers
compensation insurance, a portion of which was originated through a pool managed
by Unicover Managers, Inc. Under these arrangements, the Company both assumed
risks as a reinsurer, and also passed 95% of these risks on to other companies.
This business had originally been reinsured by a number of different companies,
and has become the subject of widespread disputes. The disputes concern the
placement of the business with reinsurers and recovery of the reinsurance. The
Company is engaged in disputes, including a number of legal proceedings, in
respect of this business. The risk to the Company is that other companies that
reinsured the business from the Company may seek to avoid their reinsurance
obligations. However, the Company believes that it has a reasonable legal
position in this matter. During the fourth quarter of 1999 and early 2000, the
Company received additional information about its exposure to losses under the
various reinsurance programs. As a result of this additional information and in
connection with global settlement discussions initiated in late 1999 with other
parties involved in the reinsurance programs, during the fourth quarter of 1999
the Company recognized a charge for uncollectible reinsurance of $133.7 million,
after tax, as its best estimate of its remaining loss exposure. The Company
believes that any exposure to loss from this issue, in addition to amounts
already provided for as of December 31, 2003, would not be material.
Reinsurance ceded contracts do not relieve the Company from its
obligations to policyholders. The Company remains liable to its policyholders
for the portion reinsured to the extent that any reinsurer does not meet its
obligations for reinsurance ceded to it under the reinsurance agreements.
Failure of the reinsurers to honor their obligations could result in losses to
the Company; consequently, estimates are established for amounts deemed or
estimated to be uncollectible. To minimize its exposure to significant losses
from reinsurance insolvencies, the Company evaluates the financial condition of
its reinsurers and monitors concentration of credit risk arising from similar
characteristics of the reinsurers.
160
JOHN HANCOCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (CONTINUED)
Note 11--Pension Benefit Plans and Other Postretirement Benefit Plans
The Company provides pension benefits to substantially all employees and
general agency personnel. These benefits are provided through both funded
qualified and unfunded non-qualified defined benefit and qualified defined
contribution pension plans. Through the non-qualified defined benefit plans, the
Company provides supplemental pension benefits to employees with salaries and/or
pension benefits in excess of the qualified plan limits under applicable law.
The Maritime Life qualified plans provide pension benefits based on years of
service and final average salary (generally during the 5 years prior to
retirement). The Maritime Life non-qualified plans provide supplemental pension
benefits to employees with salaries in excess of the qualified limit under
Canadian law and to two former executives. Prior to 2002, pension benefits under
the non-Maritime Life defined benefit plans were also based on years of service
and final average compensation (generally during the three years prior to
retirement). In 2001, the defined benefit pension plans were amended to a cash
balance basis under which benefits are based on career average compensation.
Under grandfathering rules, employees within 5 years of early retirement
eligibility or employees over age 40 and with at least 10 years of service will
receive pension benefits based on the greater of the benefit from the cash
balance basis or the prior final average salary basis. This amendment became
effective on January 1, 2002.
Benefits related to the defined benefit pension plans paid to employees
and retirees were $171.5 million in 2003, $164.3 million in 2002 and $129.8
million in 2001.
The Company uses a December 31 measurement date.
Defined contribution plans include the Investment Incentive Plan and the
Savings and Investment Plan. The expense for defined contribution plans was
$14.2 million, $13.4 million, and $13.2 million in 2003, 2002 and 2001,
respectively.
In addition to the Company defined benefit pension plans, the Company has
employee welfare plans for medical and life insurance covering most of its
retired employees and general agency personnel. Substantially all employees may
become eligible for these benefits if they reach certain age and service
requirements while employed by the Company. The postretirement health care
coverages are contributory based for post January 1, 1992 non-union retirees. A
small portion of pre-January 1, 1992 non-union retirees also contribute. The
applicable contributions are based on the number of years of service. Dental
insurance is provided to eligible pre- January 1, 1992 retired employees.
On December 8, 2003, President Bush signed into law a bill that expands
Medicare, primarily by adding a prescription drug benefit for Medicare-eligible
retirees starting in 2006. The company anticipates that the benefits it pays
after 2006 will be lower as a result of the new Medicare provisions; however,
the retiree medical obligations and costs reported do not reflect the impact of
this legislation. Deferring the recognition of the new Medicare provisions'
impact is permitted by Financial Accounting Standards Board Staff Position 106-1
due to open questions about some of the new Medicare provisions and a lack of
authoritative accounting guidance about certain matters. The final accounting
guidance could require changes to previously reported information.
161
JOHN HANCOCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (CONTINUED)
Note 11--Pension Benefit Plans and Other Postretirement Benefit Plans -
(continued)
Obligations and Funded Status:
Years Ended December 31,
-----------------------------------------------
Other Postretirement
Pension Benefits Benefits
-----------------------------------------------
2003 2002 2003 2002
-----------------------------------------------
(in millions)
Change in benefit obligation:
Benefit obligation at beginning of year ................... $2,097.6 $2,009.7 $ 591.6 $ 448.7
Service cost .............................................. 28.2 30.3 1.6 4.0
Interest cost ............................................. 136.3 138.6 35.7 33.8
Amendments ................................................ -- 9.9 (54.3) --
Actuarial loss ............................................ 169.1 93.5 97.0 143.8
Translation loss ......................................... 17.2 2.8 1.6 0.1
Benefits paid ............................................. (171.5) (164.3) (44.2) (37.6)
Curtailment ............................................... -- (22.9) (0.8) (1.2)
Acquisition/settlement .................................... 16.5 -- (3.2) --
-----------------------------------------------
Benefit obligation at end of year ......................... 2,293.4 2,097.6 625.0 591.6
===============================================
Change in plan assets:
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year ............ 1,938.4 2,292.8 204.2 245.7
Actual return on plan assets .............................. 391.1 (201.8) 44.8 (25.5)
Employer contribution ..................................... 15.3 27.2 32.3 21.6
Employee contribution ..................................... -- -- 4.2 3.9
Benefits paid ............................................. (171.5) (164.3) (48.5) (41.5)
Curtailment ............................................... -- (16.6) -- --
Translation gain .......................................... 18.2 1.1 -- --
Acquisition/settlement .................................... 26.6 -- -- --
-----------------------------------------------
Fair value of plan assets at end of year .................. 2,218.1 1,938.4 237.0 204.2
===============================================
Funded status ............................................. (75.3) (159.2) (388.0) (387.4)
Unrecognized actuarial loss .............................. 421.7 519.8 157.5 98.7
Unrecognized prior service cost ........................... 55.0 67.9 (81.2) (42.3)
Unrecognized net transition asset ......................... (5.1) (4.8) -- --
-----------------------------------------------
Prepaid (accrued) benefit cost ............................ $ 396.3 $ 423.7 $ (311.7) $ (331.0)
===============================================
Amounts recognized in the consolidated balance sheets:
Prepaid benefit cost ...................................... $ 586.7 $ 596.7
Accrued benefit liability including minimum liability ..... (330.0) (277.6)
Intangible asset .......................................... 0.1 0.1
Accumulated other comprehensive income .................... 139.5 104.5
---------------------
Net amount recognized ..................................... $ 396.3 $ 423.7
=====================
The accumulated benefit obligations for all defined benefit pension plans was
$2,181.3 million and $1,967.5 million at December 31, 2003 and 2002,
respectively.
162
JOHN HANCOCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (CONTINUED)
Note 11--Pension Benefit Plans and Other Postretirement Benefit Plans -
(continued)
Information for pension plans with accumulated benefit obligations in excess of
plan assets:
Years Ended December 31,
------------------------
2003 2002
------------------------
(in millions)
Projected benefit obligation....................... $391.2 $301.9
Accumulated benefit obligation..................... 367.5 280.2
Fair value of plan assets.......................... 38.3 5.1
Components of Net Periodic Benefit cost:
Years Ended December 31,
-------------------------------------
Other
Postretirement
Pension Benefits Benefits
-------------------------------------
2003 2002 2003 2002
-------------------------------------
(in millions)
Service cost .......................... $ 28.2 $ 30.3 $ 1.6 $ 4.0
Interest cost ......................... 136.3 138.6 35.7 33.8
Expected return on plan assets ........ (162.6) (207.6) (17.4) (22.8)
Amortization of transition asset ...... (1.0) (0.5) -- --
Amortization of prior service cost .... 7.4 7.0 (6.6) (3.2)
Recognized actuarial gain (loss) ...... 31.5 8.4 3.7 (2.0)
Other ................................. 0.5 -- -- --
----------------- ----------------
Net periodic benefit (credit) cost .... $ 40.3 $ (23.8) $ 17.0 $ 9.8
================= ================
Additional Information:
Years Ended December 31,
----------------------------------
Other
Postretirement
Pension Benefits Benefits
----------------------------------
2003 2002 2003 2002
----------------------------------
(in millions)
Increase in minimum liabilities included
in other comprehensive income............. $34.9 $41.2 N/A N/A
163
JOHN HANCOCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (CONTINUED)
Note 11--Pension Benefit Plans and Other Postretirement Benefit Plans -
(continued)
Assumptions:
Weighted-average assumptions used to determine benefit obligation:
Years Ended December 31,
----------------------------------
Other
Postretirement
Pension Benefits Benefits
----------------------------------
2003 2002 2003 2002
----------------------------------
Discount rate............................... 6.25% 6.75% 6.25% 6.75%
Rate of compensation increase............... 3.00% 3.50% N/A N/A
Health care trend rate for following year... 11.00% 10.00%
Ultimate trend rate......................... 5.25% 5.25%
Year ultimate rate reached.................. 2010 2008
Weighted-average assumptions used to determine net periodic benefit cost:
Years Ended December 31,
----------------------------------
Other
Postretirement
Pension Benefits Benefits
----------------------------------
2003 2002 2003 2002
----------------------------------
Discount rate............................... 6.75% 7.25% 6.75% 7.25%
Expected long-term return on plan assets.... 8.75% 9.50% 8.75% 9.50%
Rate of compensation increase............... 3.50% 4.25% N/A N/A
Health care trend rate for following year... 10.00% 8.00%
Ultimate trend rate......................... 5.25% 5.25%
Year ultimate rate reached.................. 2008 2006
The Company generally determines the assumed long-term rate of return on
plan assets based on the rate expected to be earned for plan assets. The asset
mix based on the long-term investment policy and range of target allocation
percentages of the plans and the Capital Asset Pricing Model are used as part of
that determination. Current conditions and published commentary/guidance from
SEC staff suggestions are also considered.
164
JOHN HANCOCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (CONTINUED)
Note 11--Pension Benefit Plans and Other Postretirement Benefit Plans -
(continued)
Assumed health care cost trend rates have a significant effect on the
amounts reported for the healthcare plans. A one-percentage point change in
assumed health care cost trend rates would have the following effects:
1-Percentage 1-Percentage
Point Increase Point Decrease
-------------- --------------
(in millions)
Effect on total service and interest costs in 2003............................. $ 3.2 $ (2.9)
Effect on postretirement benefit obligations as of December 31, 2003............ 46.2 (43.1)
Plan Assets
The Company's weighted-average asset allocations for its US plans at
December 31, 2003 and 2002, by asset category are as follows:
Pension
Plan Assets
at December 31,
--------------------
2003 2002
--------------------
Asset Category
- --------------
Equity securities...................................... 69% 64%
Fixed maturity securities............................. 24% 27%
Real estate............................................ 2% 4%
Other.................................................. 5% 5%
------ ------
Total......................................... 100% 100%
====== ======
The target allocations for assets of the Company's US pension plans is
summarized below for major asset categories.
Asset Category
- --------------
Equity securities............................................... 50% - 80%
Fixed maturity securities...................................... 25% - 35%
Real estate..................................................... 1% - 5%
Other........................................................... --% - 18%
The plans do not own any of the Company's common stock at December 31,
2003 and 2002.
Other postretirement benefit plan weighted-average asset allocations at
December 31, 2003, and 2002, by asset category are as follows:
Other Postretirement Benefits
Plan Assets
at December 31,
-----------------------------
2003 2002
-----------------------------
Asset Category
- --------------
Equity securities............................... 61% 58%
Fixed maturity securities....................... 38% 41%
Real estate..................................... --% --%
Other........................................... 1% 1%
----- -----
Total.................................. 100% 100%
===== =====
165
JOHN HANCOCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (CONTINUED)
Note 11--Pension Benefit Plans and Other Postretirement Benefit Plans -
(continued)
Plan assets for other post retirement benefits for non-union employees are
comprised of an irrevocable health insurance contract and a 401(h) account under
the pension plan. The plan assets for other postretirement benefits for other
employees are held in a 401(h) account under the pension plan. The plan assets
underlying the insurance contract have target allocations of approximately 60%
equity securities and 40% fixed maturity securities. The plan assets in the
401(h) account of the pension have target allocations identified to the target
allocations shown above for assets in the pension benefits account.
Cash Flows
Contributions. The Company's funding policy for its US qualified defined
benefit plans is to contribute annually an amount at least equal to the minimum
annual contribution required under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act
(ERISA) and other applicable laws, and, generally, not greater than the maximum
amount that can be deducted for Federal income tax purposes. In 2003 and 2002,
$0.0 million and $3.6 million respectively, were contributed to these qualified
plans. Of the $3.6 million contributed in 2002, $3.0 million was contributed to
only one plan to ensure that the plan's assets continued to exceed the plan's
Accumulated Benefit Obligation. This contribution is not deductible for 2002 but
was deductible in 2003. The funding policy for its US non-qualified defined
benefit plans is to contribute the amount of the benefit payments made during
the year. In 2003 and 2002, $14.5 million and $23.5 million, respectively, were
contributed to three non-qualified plans. The Company expects to contribute
approximately $2 million to its non-Maritime Life qualified pension plans in
2004 and approximately $25 million to its non-Maritime Life non-qualified
pension plans in 2004.
The Company's funding policy for its non-US qualified pension plans is to
contribute an amount at least equal to the minimum annual contribution required
under Canadian law. The funding policy for its non-US non-qualified pension
plans is to contribute the amount of the benefit payments made during the year.
The Company's policy is to fund its US other post retirement benefits in
amounts at or below the annual tax qualified limits.
The Company expects to contribute approximately $50 million to its US
other post retirement benefit plans in 2004.
166
JOHN HANCOCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (CONTINUED)
Note 11--Pension Benefit Plans and Other Postretirement Benefit Plans -
(continued)
The information that follows shows supplemental information for the
Company's defined benefit pension plans. Certain key summary data is shown
separately for qualified plans and non-qualified plans.
Obligations and Funded Status:
Years Ended December 31,
----------------------------------------------------------------------
2003 2002
----------------------------------------------------------------------
(in millions)
Qualified Nonqualified Qualified Nonqualified
Plans Plans Total Plans Plans Total
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Benefit obligation at the end of year ............. $1,945.3 $ 348.1 $2,293.4 $1,795.7 $ 301.9 $2,097.6
Fair value of plan assets at end of year .......... 2,212.0 6.1 2,218.1 1,933.2 5.2 1,938.4
Funded status (assets less obligations) ........... 266.7 (342.0) (75.3) 137.5 (296.7) (159.2)
Unrecognized net actuarial loss ................... 256.8 164.9 421.7 382.9 136.9 519.8
Unrecognized prior service cost ................... 65.9 (10.9) 55.0 78.6 (10.7) 67.9
Unrecognized transition (asset) liability ......... (5.1) -- (5.1) (4.9) 0.1 (4.8)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Prepaid (accrued) benefit cost .................... $ 584.3 $ (188.0) $ 396.3 $ 594.1 $ (170.4) $ 423.7
=======================================================================
Amounts recognized in the consolidated
balance sheets:
Prepaid benefit cost .............................. $ 586.7 $ -- $ 586.7 $ 596.7 $ -- $ 596.7
Accrued benefit liability including
minimum liability ............................... (9.0) (321.0) (330.0) (2.6) (275.0) (277.6)
Intangible asset .................................. -- 0.1 0.1 -- 0.1 0.1
Accumulated other comprehensive income ............ 6.6 132.9 139.5 -- 104.5 104.5
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Net amount recognized ............................. $ 584.3 $ (188.0) $ 396.3 $ 594.1 $ (170.4) $ 423.7
=======================================================================
Components of net periodic benefit cost:
Service cost ...................................... $ 26.2 $ 2.0 $ 28.2 $ 28.6 $ 1.7 $ 30.3
Interest cost ..................................... 116.3 20.0 136.3 120.6 18.0 138.6
Expected return on plan assets .................... (162.1) (0.5) (162.6) (207.4) (0.2) (207.6)
Amortization of transition asset .................. (1.0) -- (1.0) (0.6) 0.1 (0.5)
Amortization of prior service cost ................ 7.5 (0.1) 7.4 6.5 0.5 7.0
Recognized actuarial gain ......................... 21.4 10.1 31.5 2.3 6.1 8.4
Settlement and curtailments ....................... 0.5 -- 0.5 -- -- --
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Net periodic benefit (credit) cost ................ $ 8.8 $ 31.5 $ 40.3 $ (50.0) $ 26.2 $ (23.8)
=======================================================================
167
JOHN HANCOCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (CONTINUED)
Note 12--Commitments, Guarantees and Contingencies
Commitments. The Company has extended commitments to purchase fixed
maturity investments, preferred and common stock, and other invested assets and
to issue mortgage loans on real estate totaling $581.9 million, $182.0 million,
$802.8 million and $871.0 million, respectively, at December 31, 2003. If
funded, loans related to real estate mortgages would be fully collateralized by
the mortgaged properties. The Company monitors the creditworthiness of borrowers
under long-term bond commitments and requires collateral as deemed necessary.
The estimated fair values of the commitments described above aggregate $2.5
billion at December 31, 2003. The majority of these commitments expire in 2004.
Guarantees. In the course of business the Company enters into guarantees
which vary in nature and purpose and which are accounted for and disclosed under
accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S, specific to the insurance
industry. The following guarantee falls outside the scope of insurance
accounting and is disclosed pursuant to FASB Interpretation No. 45, "Guarantor's
Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, Including Indirect
Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others".
o The Life Company guarantees certain mortgage securitizations
transactions the Company entered into with FNMA and FHLMC. These
guarantees will persist until the pools of mortgages are paid off in
full by the mortgagees. The Life Company must perform under these
guarantees where the mortgagees fail to repay their mortgages. The
maximum amount of future payments the Life Company may be required
to make pursuant to these guarantees is up to 12.25% of the total
principal and interest for the FNMA securitization, or $13.2
million, and up to 10.50% of total principal and interest for the
FHLMC securitization, or $14.6 million, at December 31, 2003.
Contingencies
Class Action. During 1997, the Company entered into a court-approved
settlement relating to a class action lawsuit involving certain individual life
insurance policies sold from 1979 through 1996. In entering into the settlement,
the Company specifically denied any wrongdoing. The total reserve held in
connection with the settlement to provide for relief to class members and for
legal and administrative costs associated with the settlement amounted to $3.2
million and $11.9 million at December 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively. The
Company incurred no costs related to the settlement in 2003 or 2002. Costs
incurred related to the settlement were $30.0 million in 2001. The estimated
reserve is based on a number of factors, including the estimated cost per claim
and the estimated costs to administer the claims.
Administration of the ADR component of the settlement is substantially
complete. Although some uncertainty remains as to the cost of the remaining
claims in the final phase (i.e., arbitration) of the ADR process, it is expected
that the final cost of the settlement will not differ materially from the
amounts presently provided for by the Company.
Harris Trust. Beginning in 1983, the Company became involved in complex
litigation known as Harris Trust and Savings Bank, as Trustee of Sperry Master
Retirement Trust No. 2 v. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance Company (S.D.N.Y.
Civ. 83-5491). After successive appeals to the Second Circuit and to the U.S.
Supreme Court, the case was remanded to the District Court and tried by a
Federal District Court judge in 1997. The judge issued an opinion in November
2000.
In that opinion the Court found against the Company and awarded the
Trust approximately $13.8 million in relation to this claim together with
unspecified additional pre-judgment interest on this amount from October 1988.
The Court also found against the Company on issues of liability valuation and
ERISA law. Damages in the amount of approximately $5.7 million, together with
unspecified pre-judgment interest from December 1996, were awarded on these
issues. As part of the relief, the judge ordered the removal of Hancock as a
fiduciary to the plan. On April 11, 2001, the Court entered a judgment against
the Company for approximately $84.9 million, which includes damages to the
plaintiff, pre-judgment interest, attorney's fees and other costs.
On May 14, 2001 the Company filed an appeal in this case. On August 20,
2002, the Second Circuit Court of Appeals issued a ruling, affirming in part,
reversing in part, and vacating in part the District Court's judgment in this
case. The Second Circuit Court of Appeals' opinion overturned substantial
portions of the District Court's opinion, representing the vast majority of the
lower court's award of damages and fees, and sent the matter back to the
District Court for further proceedings.
The action has been dismissed and the settlement consummated as of
December 11, 2003. The settlement costs were paid in 2003.
168
JOHN HANCOCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (CONTINUED)
Note 12--Commitments, Guarantees and Contingencies - (continued)
Other. In the normal course of its business operations, the Company is
involved with litigation from time to time with claimants, beneficiaries and
others, and a number of litigation matters were pending as of December 31, 2003.
It is the opinion of management, after consultation with counsel, that the
ultimate liability with respect to these claims, if any, will not materially
affect the financial position or results of operations of the Company.
Note 13--Shareholders' Equity
(a) Common Stock. The Company has one class of common stock with $.01 par
value and 2.0 billion shares are authorized. At December 31, 2003, approximately
14.3 million shares of common stock were reserved for issuance related to the
issuance of stock under both the 1999 Long-term Stock Incentive Plan (as
amended, the Long-Term Stock Incentive Plan) and the Non-Employee Directors'
Long-Term Stock Incentive Plan.
The Company's Board of Directors has adopted a Shareholder Rights Plan,
pursuant to which one Right (as defined below) accompanies each outstanding
share of Common Stock issued. Each right (a "Right") entitles the holder to
purchase from the Company one one-thousandth of a share of the Company's Series
A Junior Participating Preferred Stock ("Series A Preferred") at a price of $170
(the "Purchase Price"). Under certain circumstances set forth in the Rights
Plan, in lieu of purchasing shares of Series A Preferred, the holders of Rights
(other than a person who has acquired 10% or more of the Company's Common Stock)
will be entitled to purchase additional shares of Common Stock of the Company or
its successor in the event of a merger or business combination, at a per share
price equal to half of the market price of such shares. The Rights will expire
at the close of business on January 26, 2010, unless earlier redeemed or
exchanged by the Company. Until the Right is exercised, the holder of a Right,
as such, does not have any rights as a shareholder with respect to the Rights.
As of December 31, 2003 no Rights were exercised, thus no Series A preferred
stock was issued.
On October 26, 2000, the Company announced that its Board of Directors
approved a share repurchase program beginning in the fourth quarter of 2000,
with no termination date, under which the Company was authorized to purchase up
to $500 million of its outstanding common stock. On August 6, 2001 the Board of
Directors approved an additional $500 million to be used to repurchase stock in
the repurchase program and in June 2002, the Board authorized an additional $500
million increase to the stock repurchase program, bringing the total amount
approved to be used to repurchase Company stock to $1.5 billion. The stock
repurchase program was implemented as a mechanism for the Company to deploy
excess capital and increase shareholder value, and to offset the dilutive effect
of JHFS' stock incentive plans. Stock repurchased under the program is accounted
for as treasury stock, carried at cost and reflected as a reduction to
shareholders' equity. Under the repurchase program, purchases have been and will
be made from time to time, depending on market conditions, business
opportunities and other factors, in the open market or through privately
negotiated transactions. As of December 31, 2003 and 2002, the Company had
repurchased approximately 30.0 million and 29.5 million shares of its common
stock at a total cost of $1,069.0 million and $1,057.2 million, respectively,
under this repurchase authorization
On June 8, 2001, the Company, using a "shelf registration," registered
$1.0 billion in debt securities, preferred stock, common stock, warrants, stock
purchase contracts and stock purchase units. On November 29, 2001 the Company
sold, under the $1.0 billion shelf, $500.0 million in 7-year senior unsecured
notes at a coupon of 5.625% with the proceeds used for general corporate
purposes.
169
JOHN HANCOCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (CONTINUED)
Note 13--Shareholders' Equity - (continued)
(b) Other Comprehensive Income. The components of accumulated other
comprehensive income are as follows:
Net Net Accumulated Foreign Currency Minimum Accumulated Other
Unrealized Gains (losses) on Translation Pension Comprehensive
Gains (Losses) Cash Flow Hedges Adjustment Liability Income
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(in millions)
Balance at December 31, 2000 ..................... $ 182.6 -- $ (52.3) $ (53.0) $ 77.3
Gross unrealized gains (losses) (net of
deferred income tax benefit of $67.2 million) .. (64.4) -- -- -- (64.4)
Reclassification adjustment for gains (losses),
realized in net income (net of tax expense of
$80.3 million) ................................. 149.1 -- -- -- 149.1
Adjustment for participating group annuity
contracts (net of deferred income tax
benefit of $5.1 million) ....................... (9.5) -- -- -- (9.5)
Adjustment for deferred policy acquisition
costs and present value of future profits
(net of deferred income tax benefit of
$26.8 million) ................................. (49.5) -- -- -- (49.5)
Adjustment for policyholder dividend obligation
(net of income tax benefit of $46.1 million) ... (85.6) -- -- -- (85.6)
Change in accounting principles (net of income
tax expense of $122.6 million) ................. 204.7 $ 22.9 -- -- 227.6
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net unrealized gains (losses) .................... 144.8 22.9 -- -- 167.7
Net accumulated gains (losses) on cash flow
hedges (net of income tax benefit of
$2.1 million) .................................. -- (3.8) -- -- (3.8)
Foreign currency translation adjustment .......... -- -- (28.4) -- (28.4)
Minimum pension liability (net of deferred
income tax expense of $8.2 million) ............ -- -- -- 15.2 15.2
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Balance at December 31, 2001 ..................... $ 327.4 $ 19.1 $ (80.7) $ (37.8) $ 228.0
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gross unrealized gains (losses) (net of
deferred income tax of $76.1 million) .......... 168.1 -- -- -- 168.1
Reclassification adjustment for gains (losses),
realized in net income (net of deferred income
tax of $63.7 million) .......................... 118.4 -- -- -- 118.4
Adjustment for participating group annuity
contracts (net of deferred income tax benefit
of $14.6 million) .............................. (27.2) -- -- -- (27.2)
Adjustment for deferred policy acquisition
costs and present value of future profits
(net of deferred income tax benefit of
$31.1 million) ................................. (57.7) -- -- -- (57.7)
Adjustment for policyholder dividend obligation
(net of income tax benefit of $38.0 million) ... (70.7) -- -- -- (70.7)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net unrealized gains (losses) .................... 130.9 -- -- -- 130.9
Net accumulated gains (losses) on cash flow
hedges (net of income tax expense of
$94.5 million) ................................. -- 175.4 -- -- 175.4
Foreign currency translation adjustment .......... -- -- 13.2 -- 13.2
Minimum pension liability (net of deferred
income tax benefit of $13.2 million) ........... -- -- -- (24.3) (24.3)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Balance at December 31, 2002 ..................... $ 458.3 $ 194.5 $ (67.5) $ (62.1) $ 523.2
------------------------------------------------------------------------
170
JOHN HANCOCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (CONTINUED)
Note 13--Shareholders' Equity - (continued)
Net Net Accumulated Foreign Currency Minimum Accumulated Other
Unrealized Gains (losses) on Translation Pension Comprehensive
Gains (Losses) Cash Flow Hedges Adjustment Liability Income
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(in millions)
Gross unrealized gains (losses) (net of
deferred income tax of $571.4 million) ........ $1,067.0 -- -- -- $1,067.0
Reclassification adjustment for gains (losses),
realized in net income (net of deferred
income tax of $138.3 million) .................. 256.8 -- -- -- 256.8
Adjustment for participating group annuity
contracts (net of deferred income tax
benefit of $22.0 million) ...................... (40.9) -- -- -- (40.9)
Adjustment for deferred policy acquisition
costs and present value of future profits
(net of deferred income tax benefit of
$81.7 million) ................................. (152.2) -- -- -- (152.2)
Adjustment for policyholder dividend
obligation (net of income tax benefit of
$59.2 million) ................................. (109.8) -- -- -- (109.8)
Change in accounting principle (net of income
tax expense of $53.8 million) .................. 99.9 -- -- -- 99.9
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net unrealized gains (losses) .................... 1,120.8 -- -- -- 1,120.8
Net accumulated gains (losses) on cash flow
hedges (net of income tax expense of
$15.5 million) ................................. -- 28.8 -- -- 28.8
Foreign currency translation adjustment .......... -- 137.9 -- 137.9
Minimum pension liability (net of deferred
income tax benefit of $11.6 million) .......... -- -- -- (21.9) (21.9)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Balance at December 31, 2003 ..................... $1,579.1 $ 223.3 $ 70.4 $ (84.0) $1,788.8
========================================================================
Net unrealized investment gains (losses), included in the consolidated
balance sheets as a component of shareholders' equity, are summarized as
follows:
December 31,
--------------------------------
2003 2002 2001
--------------------------------
(in millions)
Balance, end of year comprised of:
Unrealized investment gains (losses) on:
Fixed maturities .............................................................. $2,990.2 $1,092.3 $ 418.3
Equity investments ............................................................ 129.3 47.5 134.5
Derivatives and other ......................................................... 90.0 36.2 196.9
--------------------------------
Total ..................................................................................... 3,209.5 1,176.0 749.7
--------------------------------
Amounts of unrealized investment (gains) losses attributable to:
Participating group annuity contracts ......................................... -- (90.8) (49.0)
Deferred policy acquisition cost and present value of future profits .......... (380.8) (146.9) (58.1)
Policyholder dividend obligation .............................................. (422.9) (253.9) (145.2)
Deferred Federal income taxes ................................................. (826.7) (226.1) (170.0)
--------------------------------
Total ..................................................................................... (1,630.4) (717.7) (422.3)
--------------------------------
Net unrealized investment gains ........................................................... $1,579.1 $ 458.3 $ 327.4
--------------------------------
(c) Statutory Results. The Company adopted the new codified statutory
accounting principles (Codification) effective January 1, 2001. Codification
changes prescribe statutory accounting practices and results in changes to the
accounting practices that the Company and its domestic life insurance
subsidiaries use to prepare their statutory-basis financial statements.
The Life Company and its domestic insurance subsidiaries prepare their
statutory-basis financial statements in accordance with accounting practices
prescribed or permitted by the state of domicile. For the Life Company, the
Commonwealth of Massachusetts only recognizes statutory accounting practices
prescribed or permitted by Massachusetts insurance regulations and laws. The
National Association of Insurance Commissioners' "Accounting Practices and
Procedures" manual (NAIC SAP) has been adopted as a component of prescribed or
permitted practices by Massachusetts. The Commissioner of Insurance has the
right to permit other specific practices that deviate from prescribed practices,
otherwise known as permitted practices.
171
JOHN HANCOCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (CONTINUED)
Note 13--Shareholders' Equity - (continued)
From time to time the Company has requested permission from the
Commonwealth of Massachusetts Division of Insurance (the Division) for a
permitted accounting practice. The Company currently has four permitted
practices which relate to 1) an admitted asset for the pension plan prepaid
expense, 2) an admitted asset for the start-up and launch costs due from the
experience fund of the Federal Long-Term Care Program, 3) an admitted asset for
an after-tax ceding commission in the acquisition of the fixed universal life
insurance business of Allmerica Financial and 4) the Company is allowed to carry
the administrative rating symbol of Z for a selected group of securities.
Prior to 2001, the Division had provided the Company approval to recognize
as an admitted asset the prepaid pension expense in respect to the Company's
pension plan. Beginning in 2001, the Division has provided the Company with
approval to phase-in over a three-year period the impact of implementing the
material provisions of SSAP No. 8, Pensions. As a result of this permitted
practice, the Company's reported capital and surplus for the 2003 and 2002
reporting period was increased by $0 and $159.7 million, respectively.
During 2002, the Company received permission from the Division to record
an admitted asset for the Federal Long-Term Care Program start-up and launch
costs due from its experience fund of $19.3 million at December 31, 2002. As a
result of this permitted practice, the Company's reported capital and surplus
for the 2002 reporting period was increased by $19.3 million. There was no
permitted practice for this item in 2003 thus no admitted asset for start-up and
launch costs in 2003.
On December 31, 2002, the Company entered into indemnity coinsurance
agreements, under which it assumed 100% of the liabilities for the fixed
universal life insurance blocks of Allmerica Financial Life Insurance and
Annuity Company and First Allmerica Financial Life Insurance Company. The
Division provided the Company approval to record the after-tax ceding commission
of $51.1 million and $60.5 million on the purchase as goodwill at December 31,
2003 and 2002, respectively. This amount will be amortized over a ten year
period. The impact on statutory net income was an amortization expense of $9.3
million in 2003. There was no amortization expense in 2002. As a result of this
permitted practice, the Company's reported capital and surplus for the 2003 and
2002 reporting periods was increased by $51.1 million and $60.5 million,
respectively.
The Company received permission from the Division to continue carrying the
administrative rating symbol of Z for a selected group of securities as of
December 31, 2003. As of March 4, 2004 89% of the outstanding principle balance
of these securities have been rated by the Securities Valuation Office (SVO)
and, the remaining securities have a high probability of being rated in the
first quarter of 2004. As a result of this permitted practice, the Company's
reported statutory capital and surplus was increased by less than 2%.
There are no other material permitted practices.
Statutory net income and surplus in the table below include the accounts
of the John Hancock Life Company.
2003 2002 2001
-----------------------------
(in millions)
Statutory net income........................... $ 441.7 $ 210.4 $ 631.4
Statutory capital and surplus.................. 3,789.9 3,524.1 3,513.6
Massachusetts has enacted laws governing the payment of dividends by
insurers. Under Massachusetts insurance law, no insurer may pay any shareholder
dividends from any source other than statutory unassigned funds without the
prior approval of the Massachusetts Division of Insurance. Massachusetts law
also limits the dividends an insurer may pay in any twelve month period, without
the prior permission of the Massachusetts Division of Insurance, to the greater
of (i) 10% of its statutory policyholders' surplus as of the preceding December
31 or (ii) the individual company's statutory net gain from operations for the
preceding calendar year, if such insurer is a life company.
172
JOHN HANCOCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (CONTINUED)
Note 14--Segment Information
The Company's reportable segments are strategic business units offering
different products and services. The reportable segments are managed separately,
as they focus on different products, markets or distribution channels.
Protection Segment. Offers a variety of individual life insurance and
individual and group long-term care insurance products, including participating
whole life, term life, universal life, variable life, and individual and group
long-term care insurance. Products are distributed through multiple distribution
channels, including insurance agents and brokers and alternative distribution
channels that include banks, financial planners, direct marketing and the
Internet.
Asset Gathering Segment. Offers individual annuities and mutual fund
products and services. Individual annuities consist of fixed deferred annuities,
fixed immediate annuities, single premium immediate annuities, and variable
annuities. Mutual fund products and services primarily consist of open-end
mutual funds closed-end funds, institutional advisory accounts and privately
managed accounts. This segment distributes its products through distribution
channels including insurance agents and brokers affiliated with the Company,
securities brokerage firms, financial planners, pension plan sponsors, pension
plan consultants and banks.
Guaranteed and Structured Financial Products (G&SFP) Segment. Offers a
variety of retirement products to qualified defined benefit plans, defined
contribution plans and non-qualified buyers. The Company's products include
guaranteed investment contracts, funding agreements, single premium annuities,
and general account participating annuities and fund type products. These
contracts provide non-guaranteed, partially guaranteed, and fully guaranteed
investment options through general and separate account products. The segment
distributes its products through a combination of dedicated regional
representatives, pension consultants and investment professionals. The segment's
consumer notes program distributes primarily through brokers affiliated with the
Company and securities brokerage firms. The segment's new banking products
distribute primarily through the broker-dealer network to the retail investors.
Investment Management Segment. Offers a wide range of investment
management products and services to investors covering a variety of private and
publicly traded asset classes including fixed income, equity, mortgage loans,
and real estate. This segment distributes its products through a combination of
dedicated sales and marketing professionals, independent marketing specialists,
and investment professionals.
Maritime Life Segment. Offers a variety of individual life insurance and
living benefits investment products, pensions, group life and health products
and services in the Canadian markets. In the first quarter of 2003, the Company
implemented organizational changes within the Corporate and Other Segment that
resulted in reporting the Maritime Life business as its own operating segment
for the first time. The reclassifications associated with the realignment of the
operating segments had no impact on segment after-tax operating income, or net
income of the Maritime Life, or Corporate and Other Segments, other than to
display these businesses separately.
Corporate and Other Segment. Primarily consists of the Company's
international insurance operations, certain corporate operations, the impact of
foreign exchange fluctuations on Maritime Life's operating results, and
businesses that are either disposed or in run-off. Corporate operations
primarily include certain financing activities, income on capital not
specifically allocated to the reporting segments and certain non-recurring
expenses not allocated to the segments. The disposed businesses primarily
consist of group health insurance and related group life insurance, property and
casualty insurance and selected broker/dealer operations.
The accounting policies of the segments are the same as those described in
Note 1 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies. Allocations of net
investment income are based on the amount of assets allocated to each segment.
Other costs and operating expenses are allocated to each segment based on a
review of the nature of such costs, cost allocations utilizing time studies, and
other relevant allocation methodologies.
173
JOHN HANCOCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (CONTINUED)
Note 14--Segment Information - (continued)
Management of the Company evaluates performance based on segment after-tax
operating income, which excludes the effect of net realized investment and other
gains (losses) and unusual or non-recurring events and transactions. Segment
after-tax operating income is determined by adjusting GAAP net income for net
realized investment and other gains (losses), including gains and losses on
disposals of businesses and certain other items which management believes are
not indicative of overall operating trends. While these items may be significant
components in understanding and assessing the Company's financial performance,
management believes that the presentation of after-tax operating income enhances
its understanding of the Company's results of operations by highlighting net
income attributable to the normal, recurring operations of the business.
Amounts reported as after-tax adjustments to segment net income in the
tables below primarily relate to:
(i) certain net realized investment and other gains (losses), net of
related amortization adjustment for deferred policy acquisition
costs, amounts credited to participating pension contractholder
accounts and policyholder dividend obligation (the adjustment for
net realized investment and other gains (losses) excludes gains and
losses from mortgage securitizations because management views the
related gains and losses as an integral part of the core business of
those operations);
(ii) a 2002 charge to benefits to policyholders and expenses incurred
relating to the settlement of a class action lawsuit against the
Company involving a dispute regarding disclosure of costs on various
modes of life insurance policy premium payment and a 2001 charge to
benefits to policyholders and expenses incurred relating to the
settlement of a class action lawsuit against the Company involving
certain individual life insurance policies sold from 1979 through
1996;
(iii) 2002 and 2001 restructuring costs related to reducing staff in the
home office and terminating certain operations outside the home
office;
(iv) the 2001 surplus tax applicable to mutual life insurance companies
which are no longer applicable to the Company;
(v) cumulative effect of accounting changes.
174
JOHN HANCOCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (CONTINUED)
Note 14--Segment Information - (continued)
The following table summarizes selected financial information by segment
for the year ended or as of December 31 and reconciles segment revenues and
segment after-tax operating income to amounts reported in the consolidated
statements of income (in millions):
Asset Investment Maritime Corporate
Protection Gathering G&SFP Management Life and Other Consolidated
---------- --------- ----- ---------- ---- --------- ------------
2003
- ----
Revenues:
Revenues from external customers ......... $ 2,448.3 $ 543.1 $ 525.3 $ 102.8 $ 1,218.9 $ 983.8 $ 5,822.2
Net investment income .................... 1,434.4 710.1 1,695.4 17.1 339.1 30.9 4,227.0
Inter-segment revenues ................... -- 1.2 0.7 25.1 -- (27.0) --
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Segment revenues ......................... 3,882.7 1,254.4 2,221.4 145.0 1,558.0 987.7 10,049.2
Net realized investment and other
gains (losses) ......................... (28.3) (47.0) (219.4) (0.9) 11.3 306.4 22.1
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Revenues ................................. $ 3,854.4 $ 1,207.4 $ 2,002.0 $ 144.1 $ 1,569.3 $ 1,294.1 $ 10,071.3
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net Income:
Segment after-tax operating income ....... $ 351.5 $ 194.3 $ 321.7 $ 29.8 $ 105.1 $ (53.3) $ 949.1
Net realized investment and other
gains (losses) ......................... (18.5) (30.2) (135.9) (0.5) 14.4 193.8 23.1
Cumulative effect of accounting
change, net of tax ..................... (6.2) (4.5) (155.5) -- -- -- (166.2)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net income ............................... $ 326.8 $ 159.6 $ 30.3 $ 29.3 $ 119.5 $ 140.5 $ 806.0
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Supplemental Information:
Equity in net income of investees
accounted for by the equity method ..... $ 31.0 $ 16.9 $ 57.9 $ 4.4 -- $ 30.7 $ 140.9
Carrying amount of investments
accounted for under the equity
method ................................. 410.2 249.2 586.1 13.1 -- 745.3 2,003.9
Amortization of deferred policy
acquisition costs ...................... 211.7 111.4 2.3 -- $ (14.2) 4.3 315.5
Interest expense ......................... 0.2 -- -- 6.1 17.2 75.9 99.4
Income tax expense ....................... 164.6 74.4 69.1 17.8 53.8 (3.0) 376.7
Segment assets ........................... 35,733.6 18,721.5 36,791.9 2,287.8 14,469.4 3,296.3 111,300.5
Net Realized Investment and Other
Gains (Losses) Data:
Net realized investment and other
gains losses) .......................... $ (94.1) $ (33.5) $ (222.8) $ 10.6 $ 15.4 $ 306.9 $ (17.5)
Plus amortization of deferred
policy acquisition costs related
to net realized investment and
other gains (losses) ................... 7.3 (13.5) -- -- (2.5) (0.3) (9.0)
Less amounts credited to
participating pension
contractholder accounts ................ -- -- 3.4 -- (1.6) (0.2) 1.6
Add amounts credited to the
policyholder dividend obligation ....... 58.5 -- -- -- -- -- 58.5
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net realized investment and other
gains (losses), net of related
amortization of deferred policy
acquisition costs, amounts
credited to participating pension
contractholders and amounts
credited to the policyholder
dividend obligation--per
consolidated financial statements ...... (28.3) (47.0) (219.4) 10.6 11.3 306.4 33.6
Less net realized investment and
other gains (losses) attributable
to mortgage securitizations ............ -- -- -- (11.5) -- -- (11.5)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net realized investment and other
gains (losses), net-pre-tax
adjustment made to calculate
segment operating income ............... (28.3) (47.0) (219.4) (0.9) 11.3 306.4 22.1
Less income tax effect ................... 9.8 16.8 83.5 0.4 3.1 (112.6) 1.0
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net realized investment and other
gains (losses), net-after-tax
adjustment made to calculate
segment operating income ............... $ (18.5) $ (30.2) $ (135.9) $ (0.5) $ 14.4 $ 193.8 $ 23.1
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
175
JOHN HANCOCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (CONTINUED)
Note 14--Segment Information - (continued)
Asset Investment Maritime Corporate
Protection Gathering G&SFP Management Life and Other Consolidated
---------- --------- ----- ---------- ---- --------- ------------
2002
- ----
Revenues:
Revenues from external customers .......... $ 2,269.1 $ 571.0 $ 352.8 $ 76.0 $ 909.7 $ 821.0 $ 4,999.6
Net investment income ..................... 1,326.6 575.7 1,715.1 15.1 313.0 (11.4) 3,934.1
Inter-segment revenues .................... -- 1.1 -- 33.5 -- (34.6) --
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Segment revenues .......................... 3,595.7 1,147.8 2,067.9 124.6 1,222.7 775.0 8,933.7
Net realized investment and other
gains (losses) .......................... (64.1) (42.5) (317.6) 0.4 (2.2) (29.6) (455.6)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Revenues .................................. $ 3,531.6 $ 1,105.3 $ 1,750.3 $ 125.0 $ 1,220.5 $ 745.4 $ 8,478.1
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net Income:
Segment after-tax operating income ........ $ 308.5 $ 130.7 $ 285.4 $ 21.2 69.0 11.4 $ 826.2
Net realized investment and other
gains (losses) .......................... (41.5) (25.7) (202.0) 0.4 (8.8) (19.1) (296.7)
Class action lawsuit ...................... (18.7) -- -- -- -- (0.8) (19.5)
Restructuring charges ..................... (5.7) (6.1) (0.6) (0.8) (0.3) 3.0 (10.5)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net income ................................ $ 242.6 $ 98.9 $ 82.8 $ 20.8 $ 59.9 $ (5.5) $ 499.5
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Supplemental Information:
Equity in net income of investees
accounted for by the equity method ...... $ 17.9 $ 8.7 $ 34.5 $ 0.3 -- $ 5.4 $ 66.8
Carrying amount of investments
accounted for under the equity
method .................................. 213.0 137.5 387.3 11.4 -- 695.2 1,444.4
Amortization of deferred policy
acquisition costs ....................... 185.7 140.5 2.2 -- $ 17.5 4.3 350.2
Interest expense .......................... 0.5 0.5 -- 6.7 17.6 73.3 98.6
Income tax expense ........................ 133.6 42.5 25.2 12.2 46.9 (123.7) 136.7
Segment assets ............................ 31,301.8 16,052.8 34,396.7 2,370.8 10,536.7 3,205.3 97,864.1
Net Realized Investment and Other
Gains (Losses) Data:
Net realized investment and other
gains (losses) .......................... $ (85.8) $ (70.9) $ (340.9) $ 1.6 $ 1.1 $ (29.6) $ (524.5)
Plus amortization of deferred
policy acquisition costs related
to net realized investment and
other gains (losses) .................... 9.8 28.1 -- -- (3.3) -- 34.6
Less amounts credited to
participating pension
contractholder accounts ................. -- -- 23.3 -- -- -- 23.3
Add amounts credited to the
policyholder dividend obligation ........ 11.9 -- -- -- -- -- 11.9
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net realized investment and other
gains (losses), net of related
amortization of deferred policy
acquisition costs, amounts
credited to participating pension
contractholders and amounts
credited to the policyholder
dividend obligation--per
consolidated financial statements ....... (64.1) (42.8) (317.6) 1.6 (2.2) (29.6) (454.7)
Less net realized investment and
other gains (losses) attributable
to mortgage securitizations ............. -- 0.3 -- (1.2) -- -- (0.9)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net realized investment and other
gains (losses), net-pre-tax
adjustment made to calculate
segment operating income ................ (64.1) (42.5) (317.6) 0.4 (2.2) (29.6) (455.6)
Less income tax effect .................... 22.6 16.8 115.6 -- (6.6) 10.5 158.9
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net realized investment and other
gains (losses), net-after-tax
adjustment made to calculate
segment operating income ................ $ (41.5) $ (25.7) $ (202.0) $ 0.4 $ (8.8) $ (19.1) $ (296.7)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
176
JOHN HANCOCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (CONTINUED)
Note 14--Segment Information - (continued)
Asset Investment Maritime Corporate
Protection Gathering G&SFP Management Life and Other Consolidated
---------- --------- ----- ---------- ---- --------- ------------
2001
- ----
Revenues:
Revenues from external customers .......... $ 2,120.4 $ 678.0 $ 957.5 $ 86.5 $ 794.3 $ 801.2 $ 5,437.9
Net investment income ..................... 1,264.7 498.5 1,835.6 28.7 282.1 35.3 3,944.9
Inter-segment revenues .................... -- -- -- 28.0 -- (28.0) --
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Segment revenues .......................... 3,385.1 1,176.5 2,793.1 143.2 1,076.4 808.5 9,382.8
Net realized investment and other
gains (losses) .......................... (98.1) (54.8) (121.0) (0.2) (3.2) 25.0 (252.3)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Revenues .................................. $ 3,287.0 1,121.7 $ 2,672.1 $ 143.0 $ 1,073.2 $ 833.5 $ 9,130.5
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net Income:
Segment after-tax operating income ........ $ 298.7 $ 148.3 $ 244.2 $ 29.8 $ 47.9 $ 36.8 $ 805.7
Net realized investment and other
gains (losses) .......................... (62.2) (34.7) (76.9) (0.2) (3.1) 16.4 (160.7)
Class action lawsuit ...................... -- -- -- -- -- (19.5) (19.5)
Restructuring charges ..................... (4.4) (17.6) (1.2) (0.9) (2.0) (1.3) (27.4)
Surplus tax ............................... 9.6 0.2 2.6 0.1 -- 0.9 13.4
Cumulative effect of accounting
changes, net of tax ..................... 11.7 (0.5) (1.2) (0.2) -- (2.6) 7.2
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net income ................................ $ 253.4 $ 95.7 $ 167.5 $ 28.6 $ 42.8 $ 30.7 $ 618.7
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Supplemental Information:
Equity in net income of investees
accounted for by the equity method ...... $ 12.9 $ 7.0 $ 24.8 $ 6.9 -- 7.0 $ 58.6
Carrying amount of investments
accounted for under the equity
method .................................. 121.5 87.7 212.0 11.2 -- 693.2 1,125.6
Amortization of deferred policy
acquisition costs ....................... 182.2 75.0 2.4 -- $ 43.9 3.3 306.8
Interest expense .......................... 0.9 1.9 -- 12.4 11.8 43.3 70.3
Income tax expense ........................ 116.6 35.0 74.3 16.2 18.2 (45.7) 214.6
Segment assets ............................ 28,505.0 14,740.5 31,636.1 2,049.8 10,506.8 3,706.0 91,144.2
Net Realized Investment and Other
Gains (Losses) Data:
Net realized investment and other
gains losses) ........................... $ (122.9) $ (76.4) $ (78.7) $ 3.0 $ (0.2) $ 25.0 $ (250.2)
Plus amortization of deferred
policy acquisition costs related
to net realized investment and
other gains (losses) .................... 7.8 21.6 -- -- (3.0) -- 26.4
Less amounts credited to
participating pension
contractholder accounts ................. -- -- (42.3) -- -- -- (42.3)
Add amounts credited to the
policyholder dividend obligation ........ 17.0 -- -- -- -- -- 17.0
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net realized investment and other
gains (losses), net of related
amortization of deferred policy
acquisition costs, amounts
credited to participating pension
contractholders and amounts
credited to the policyholder
dividend obligation--per
consolidated financial statements ....... (98.1) (54.8) (121.0) 3.0 (3.2) 25.0 (249.1)
Less net realized investment and
other gains (losses) attributable
to mortgage securitizations ............. -- -- -- (3.2) -- -- (3.2)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net realized investment and other
gains (losses), net-pre-tax
adjustment made to calculate
segment operating income ................ (98.1) (54.8) (121.0) (0.2) (3.2) 25.0 (252.3)
Less income tax effect .................... 35.9 20.1 44.1 -- 0.1 (8.6) 91.6
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net realized investment and other
gains (losses), net-after-tax
adjustment made to calculate
segment operating income ................ $ (62.2) $ (34.7) $ (76.9) $ (0.2) $ (3.1) $ 16.4 $ (160.7)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
177
JOHN HANCOCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (CONTINUED)
Note 14--Segment Information - (continued)
The Company operates primarily in the United States, Canada and the
Pacific Rim (including China, Indonesia, Malaysia, the Philippines, Singapore,
and Thailand). The following table summarizes selected financial information by
geographic location for the year ended or at December 31:
Income Before
Income Taxes and
Long-lived Cumulative Effect of
Location Revenues Assets Assets Accounting Changes
- -------- ---------------------------------------------------------
2003
United States ...... $ 7,759.4 $ 284.4 $ 95,404.5 $1,140.0
Canada ............. 1,777.7 86.4 14,921.8 194.8
Foreign--other ..... 534.2 3.6 974.2 14.1
---------------------------------------------------------
$ 10,071.3 $ 374.4 $111,300.5 $1,348.9
=========================================================
2002
United States ...... $ 6,840.0 $ 184.2 $ 86,018.5 $ 523.0
Canada ............. 1,227.7 58.1 11,047.6 105.2
Foreign--other ..... 410.4 3.9 798.0 8.0
---------------------------------------------------------
$ 8,478.1 $ 246.2 $ 97,864.1 $ 636.2
=========================================================
2001
United States ...... $ 7,688.1 $ 541.0 $ 80,022.8 $ 760.2
Canada ............. 1,076.4 48.0 10,506.8 61.0
Foreign--other ..... 366.0 3.6 614.6 4.9
---------------------------------------------------------
$ 9,130.5 $ 592.6 $ 91,144.2 $ 826.1
=========================================================
The Company has no reportable major customers and revenues are attributed
to countries based on the location of customers.
178
JOHN HANCOCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (CONTINUED)
Note 15--Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The following discussion outlines the methodologies and assumptions used
to determine the fair value of the Company's financial instruments. The
aggregate fair value amounts presented below do not represent the underlying
value of the Company and, accordingly, care should be exercised in drawing
conclusions about the Company's business or financial condition based on the
fair value information presented below.
The following methods and assumptions were used by the Company to
determine the fair values of financial instruments:
Fair values for publicly traded fixed maturities (including redeemable
preferred stocks). Quarterly a review is made of the entire fixed maturity
portfolio to assess credit quality, including a review of all impairments
with the Life Company's Committee of Finance, a sub-committee to the Board
of Directors. At the end of each quarter our Investment Review Committee
reviews all securities trading below ninety cents on the dollar to
determine whether other than temporary impairments need to be recorded.
The results of this quarterly analysis are reviewed by the Life Company's
Committee of Finance. The fair value for equity securities is based on
quoted market prices.
The fair value for mortgage loans on real estate is estimated using
discounted cash flow analyses using interest rates adjusted to reflect the
credit characteristics of the loans. Mortgage loans with similar
characteristics and credit risks are aggregated into qualitative
categories for purposes of the fair value calculations. Fair values for
impaired mortgage loans are measured based either on the present value of
expected future cash flows discounted at the loan's effective interest
rate or the fair value of the underlying collateral for loans that are
collateral dependent.
The carrying value for policy loans, short-term investments and cash and
cash equivalents approximates their respective fair values.
The fair value of the Company's long-term debt is estimated using
discounted cash flows based on the Company's incremental borrowing rates
for similar types of borrowing arrangements. Carrying values for
commercial paper and short-term borrowings approximate fair value.
Fair values for the Company's guaranteed investment contracts, consumer
notes, and funding agreements are estimated using discounted cash flow
calculations based on interest rates currently being offered for similar
contracts with maturities consistent with those remaining for the
contracts being valued. The fair value for fixed-rate deferred annuities
is the account value adjusted for current market interest rates. Fair
values for immediate annuities without life contingencies and
supplementary contracts without life contingencies are estimated based on
discounted cash flow calculations using current market rates.
The Company's derivatives include futures contracts, interest rate swap,
cap and floor agreements, swaptions, currency rate swap agreements and
equity collar agreements. Fair values for these contracts are based on
current settlement values. These values are based on quoted market prices
for the financial futures contracts and brokerage quotes that utilize
pricing models or formulas using current assumptions for all swaps and
other agreements.
The fair value for commitments approximates the amount of the outstanding
commitment.
179
JOHN HANCOCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (CONTINUED)
Note 15--Fair Value of Financial Instruments - (continued)
The following table presents the carrying value and fair values of the
Company's financial instruments:
December 31,
------------------------------------------------------
2003 2002
Carrying Carrying
Value Fair Value Value Fair Value
------------------------------------------------------
(in millions)
Assets:
Fixed maturities:
Held-to-maturity.......................................... $ 1,498.6 $ 1,523.0 $ 1,732.2 $ 1,781.8
Available-for-sale........................................ 51,887.0 51,887.0 45,847.3 45,847.3
Trading securities........................................ 42.2 42.2 18.9 18.9
Equity securities:
Available-for-sale........................................ 795.1 795.1 672.3 672.3
Trading securities........................................ 448.4 448.4 296.3 296.3
Mortgage loans on real estate................................... 12,936.0 13,979.5 11,805.7 12,726.1
Policy loans.................................................... 2,117.9 2,117.9 2,097.2 2,097.2
Short-term investments.......................................... 121.6 121.6 211.2 211.2
Cash and cash equivalents....................................... 3,121.6 3,121.6 1,190.6 1,190.6
Derivatives:
Futures contracts, net.................................... 0.5 0.5 0.3 0.3
Interest rate swap agreements............................. 190.5 190.5 162.0 162.0
Interest rate swap CMT.................................... 0.7 0.7 1.7 1.7
Interest rate cap agreements.............................. 28.2 28.2 15.9 15.9
Interest rate floor agreements............................ 76.0 76.0 93.2 93.2
Currency rate swap agreements............................. 790.3 790.3 281.7 281.7
Foreign exchange forward.................................. 4.4 4.4 -- --
Credit default swaps...................................... 1.9 1.9 -- --
Equity collar agreements.................................. 2.0 2.0 12.8 12.8
Equity options............................................ 1.2 1.2 0.6 0.6
Equity swaps.............................................. 0.1 0.1 -- --
Liabilities:
Consumer notes.................................................. 1,550.4 1,473.0 290.2 272.9
Debt............................................................ 1,895.3 2,025.8 1,799.2 1,897.6
Guaranteed investment contracts and funding agreements.......... 17,540.9 17,550.5 18,192.5 18,253.4
Fixed rate deferred and immediate annuities..................... 10,336.0 10,602.9 8,466.9 8,775.9
Supplementary contracts without life contingencies.............. 56.6 61.6 52.8 59.1
Derivatives:
Futures contracts, net.................................... 0.2 0.2 0.5 0.5
Interest rate swap agreements............................. 842.2 842.2 1,240.6 1,240.6
Interest rate swaption agreements......................... 2.6 2.6 3.2 3.2
Currency rate swap agreements............................. 677.1 677.1 166.3 166.3
Credit default swaps...................................... 1.4 1.4 -- --
Equity collar agreements.................................. -- -- -- --
Equity swaps.............................................. -- -- -- --
Commitments..................................................... -- 2,494.0 -- 1,985.9
180
JOHN HANCOCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (CONTINUED)
Note 16--Stock Compensation Plans
On January 5, 2000, the Life Company, as sole shareholder of John Hancock
Financial Services, Inc., approved and adopted the 1999 Long-Term Stock
Incentive Plan (the Incentive Plan), which originally had been approved by the
Board of Directors (the Board) of the Company on August 31, 1999. Under the
Incentive Plan, which became effective on February 1, 2000, the effective date
of the Plan of Reorganization of the Life Company, options granted may be either
non-qualified stock options or incentive stock options qualifying under Section
422 of the Internal Revenue Code. The Incentive Plan objectives include
attracting and retaining the best personnel, providing for additional
performance incentives, and promoting the success of the Company by providing
employees the opportunity to acquire the Company's common stock. In 2001, the
Board adopted and the stockholders approved the amended and restated 1999
Long-Term Stock Incentive Plan (as amended the Long-Term Stock Incentive Plan)
and the Non-Employee Directors' Long-Term Stock Incentive Plan (the Directors'
Plan, collectively, the Incentive Plans).
The maximum number of shares of common stock available under the Long-Term
Incentive Plan is 40,741,403. In addition, no more than 8,148,281 of these
shares shall be available for stock awards. The maximum number of shares that
may be granted as incentive stock options is 32,593,122 shares. The aggregate
number of shares that may be covered by awards for any one participant over the
period that the Long-Term Stock Incentive Plan is in effect shall not exceed
8,148,281 shares. Subject to these overall limits, there is no annual limit on
the number of stock options or stock awards that may be granted in any one year.
The maximum number of shares available in the Non-Employee Directors'
Long-Term Stock Incentive Plan is 1,000,000 shares of common stock. Pursuant to
the Non-Employee Directors' Long-Term Stock Incentive Plan, each director
receives 50% of the annual retainer paid to eligible directors in the form of
stock awards. Where a director elects to have the remaining 50% of their
retainer invested in shares of the Company's common stock through open market
purchases the Company grants a partial matching stock award, which is
forfeitable. Commencing on April 1, 2002, the matching stock award is
transferred from the Non-Employee Directors' Long-Term Stock Incentive Plan. In
addition, on stockholder approval of the Non-Employee Directors' Long-Term Stock
Incentive Plan, each non-employee director received a non-qualified stock option
award of 15,000 shares. Through December 31, 2002, as any new non-employee
director is appointed that person will receive an initial option award of 15,000
shares and annually thereafter, at the date of the Company's annual meeting,
each will receive non-qualified stock option awards for 5,000 shares. As of
January 1, 2003, in lieu of stock option grants made in prior year, the Board of
Directors receives an annual retainer paid in common stock transferred from the
Non Employee Director Long-Term Stock Incentive Plan. The stock compensation
granted under the Incentive Plans contain various vesting provisions described
in more detail below. All outstanding stock compensation grants made prior to
September 28, 2003 vest upon the change of control with Manulife, should that
transaction be approved by the shareholders and regulatory authorities. Pursuant
to the definitive merger agreement with Manulife, no stock compensation grants
made under the Incentive Plans subsequent to September 28, 2003 (except for
restricted stock and restricted deferred stock units issued to non-employee
directors on or before December 31, 2003) vest on the potential change in
control with Manulife.
The following data is presented as of December 31, 2003:
Number of shares
remaining available
Number of shares for future issuance
to be issued Weighted-average under equity
upon exercise of exercise price of compensation plans
outstanding outstanding (excluding shares
options, warrants options, warrants reflected in column
Plan Category and rights and rights (a))
- ------------- ----------------- ----------------- --------------------
(a) (b) (c)
(in thousands) (in thousands)
Equity compensation plans approved by stockholders.......... 22,570.9 $ 34.59 14,258.9
Equity compensation plans not approved by stockholders...... -- -- --
-------- ------- --------
Total....................................................... 22,570.9 $ 34.59 14,258.9
======== ======= ========
The Incentive Plans have options exercisable at the dates listed in the
table below. The Company granted 1.1 million options during the year ended
December 31, 2003. Options outstanding under the Long-Term Stock Incentive Plan
were granted at a price equal to the market value of the stock on the date of
grant, vest over a two- year period, and expire five years after the grant date.
Options outstanding under the Non-Employee Directors' Plan were granted at a
price equal to the market value of the stock on the date of grant, vest
immediately, and expire five years after grant date. There were no options
granted under the Non Employee Director Long-Term Stock Incentive Plan in 2003.
181
JOHN HANCOCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (CONTINUED)
Note 16--Stock Compensation Plans - (continued)
The status of stock options awards under the Incentive Plans are
summarized below as of December 31:
Shares subject Weighted-
Number of Weighted- to exercisable average
shares average options exercise
(in thousands) exercise price (in thousands) price per share
-------------- -------------- -------------- ---------------
Outstanding at December 31, 2000................. 4,306.6 $ 14.07
Granted.................................... 11,185.2 35.96
Exercised.................................. 885.5 14.05
Canceled................................... 1,017.4 29.61
---------
Outstanding at December 31, 2001................. 13,588.9 $ 30.92 2,521.5 $ 24.83
Granted.................................... 11,153.1 36.94
Exercised.................................. 971.6 14.74
Canceled................................... 400.1 35.38
---------
Outstanding at December 31, 2002................. 23,370.3 $ 34.39 9,252.3 30.25
Granted.................................... 1,020.1 27.78
Exercised.................................. 931.0 20.52
Canceled................................... 888.5 36.00
---------
Outstanding at December 31, 2003................. 22,570.9 $ 34.59 17,028.9 34.19
--------- ------- -------- ------
Through December 31, 2002, the Company accounted for stock-based
compensation using the intrinsic value method prescribed by APB Opinion No. 25,
under which no compensation cost for stock options is recognized for stock
option awards granted at or above fair market value, with the exception of the
Signator Stock Option Program. Had compensation expense for the remaining
Company's stock-based compensation plan been determined based upon fair values
at the grant dates for awards under the plan in accordance with SFAS No. 123,
the Company's net income and earnings per share would have been reduced to the
pro forma amounts indicated below. Stock option awards granted after December
31, 2002 are accounted for using the fair value method prescribed by SFAS No.
123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation.
The estimated weighted-average fair value per option using the
Black-Scholes option valuation model was $5.79, $7.70 and $9.35, for the years
ending December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively, using the following
assumptions:
2003 2002 2001
-------------------------------
Expected term............................. 3 years 3 years 3-5 years
Risk free rate(1)......................... 2.51% 2.51% 4.6%-6.0%
Dividend yield............................ 1.05% 1.05% 1.0%
Expected volatility....................... 28.8% 28.8% 32.0%
- ----------
(1) Dependent on grant date.
182
JOHN HANCOCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (CONTINUED)
Note 16--Stock Compensation Plans - (continued)
For the purposes of pro forma disclosures, the estimated fair value of the
options is amortized to expense over the options' vesting period. The Company's
pro forma information follows:
Years Ended December 31,
---------------------------------------
2003 2002 2001
---------------------------------------
(in millions, except per share data)
Net income, as reported ...................................... $ 806.0 $ 499.5 $ 618.7
Add: Stock-based employee compensation expense
included in reported net income, net of related tax effects .. 14.4 3.5 1.0
Deduct: Total stock-based employee compensation expense
determined under fair value method for all awards, net of
related tax effects (unaudited) .............................. 42.3 60.2 36.4
---------------------------------------
Pro forma net income (unaudited) ............................. $ 778.1 $ 442.8 $ 583.3
=======================================
Earnings per share
Basic:
As reported ............................................ $ 2.80 $ 1.71 $ 2.03
Pro forma (unaudited) .................................. 2.71 1.52 1.92
Diluted:
As reported ............................................ 2.79 1.70 2.01
Pro forma (unaudited) .................................. 2.69 1.51 1.90
The following table summarizes information about stock options outstanding
at December 31, 2003:
Weighted-
average
exercise
Number of Weighted-average Number of price
options remaining exercisable of
outstanding contractual life Weighted-average options exercisable
Range of exercise price at 12/31/03 (years) exercise price at 12/31/03 options
- ----------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(in thousands) (in thousands)
$12.49--$16.65................... 1,548.0 1.2 $13.94 1,548.0 $13.94
$20.81--$24.97................... 31.8 1.6 23.58 31.8 23.58
$24.97--$29.13................... 3,345.9 4.0 28.60 1,164.9 28.94
$29.13--$33.30................... 1,141.2 3.8 30.44 1,008.2 30.52
$33.30--$37.46................... 8,842.4 2.2 35.51 8,744.9 35.53
$37.46--$41.62................... 7,661.6 2.9 40.99 4,531.1 40.78
-------- --------
22,570.9 2.7 $34.59 17,028.9 $34.19
======== ====== ====== ======== =======
Under the Signator Stock Option Program, pursuant to the Long-Term Stock
Incentive Plan, which was implemented in 2001, the Company granted 382,983 stock
options during February 2003 at a grant price of $26.89 per share. The Company
granted 270,270 stock options during February 2002 at a grant price of $37.57
per share and 20,000 stock options at a grant price of $40.50 per share during
March 2002. During February 2001, the Company granted 343,739 stock options at a
grant price of $35.53 per share. All stock option awards under the Signator
Stock Option Program were granted to non-employee general agents at a price
equal to the market value of the stock on the date of grant. The stock options
vest over a two-year period, subject to continued participation in the John
Hancock sales program and attainment of established, individual sales goals.
After one year of vesting, an agent is allowed to exercise 50% of the stock
options granted. The Company amortizes compensation expense for Signator Stock
Option Program grants over a 24-month period commencing on grant date at a fair
value of $5.60, $7.83, $8.44 and $9.24 per option determined by the
Black-Scholes Option valuation model for the February 2003, February 2002, March
2002 and February 2001 grants, respectively. In accordance with EITF No. 96-18
"Accounting for Equity Instruments That Are Issued to Other Than Employees for
Acquiring, or in Conjunction with Selling Goods or Services." The expense
related to option grants under the Signator Stock Option Program is adjusted to
a current fair value at each reporting period. Total amortization expense
recognized for the year ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001 was $2.0 million,
$1.4 million and $1.3 million respectively. The total grant date fair value of
the stock options granted under the program from January 1, 2003 through
December 31, 2003, is $2.1 million, the total grant date fair value of the stock
options granted under the program from January 1, 2002 through December 31,
2002, is $2.3 million and from January 1, 2001 through December 31, 2001, is
$3.1 million. During 2003, 2002 and 2001, 94,555, 67,457 and 4,737 stock options
were forfeited with a total grant date price of $3.3 million, $0.5 million and
$0.01 million, respectively. The outstanding option balance for the 2003, 2002
and 2001 grants under the Signator Stock Options Grant Program are 367,764,
238,002, and 177,224, respectively, at December 31, 2003.
183
JOHN HANCOCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (CONTINUED)
Note 16--Stock Compensation Plans - (continued)
In 2003, the Company anticipates a $7.2 million tax deduction on its tax
return for employee stock option compensation. The Company plans to file its
2003 tax return by September 15, 2004. In 2002 and 2001, the Company deducted
$12.3 million and $12.4 million, respectively, on its tax return for employee
stock option compensation.
Stock Grants to Non-Executives
During February and March 2001, the Company granted 268,293 total shares
of non-vested stock to key personnel. The program was funded with cash and the
shares were purchased on the open market at the weighted-average grant price of
$37.22 per share. These grants of non-vested stock are forfeitable and, at the
time of the grant, vested at three years of service with the Company. The total
grant-date exercise price of the non-vested stock granted from January 1, 2001
through December 31, 2001 is $10.0 million. During 2003, 2002 and 2001, 1,939,
4,051 and 16,768 shares of non-vested stock were forfeited with a total
grant-date exercise price of $0.1 million $0.2 million and $0.6 million,
respectively. During 2003, 163,642 shares were vested. The outstanding share
balance in the 2001 plan is 81,893 at December 31, 2003.
During February 2002, the Company granted 154,643 total shares of
non-vested stock to key personnel. The program was funded with cash and the
shares were purchased on the open market at the weighted-average grant price of
$38.22 per share. These grants of non-vested stock are forfeitable and, at the
time of the grant, vested at three years of service with the Company. The total
grant-date exercise price of the non-vested stock granted from January 1, 2002
through December 31, 2002 is $5.9 million. During 2003 and 2002 1,507 and 66
shares of non-vested stock were forfeited with a total grant-date price of $0.1
million and $0.01 million, respectively. During 2003, 51,307 shares were vested.
The outstanding share balance in the 2002 plan is 101,763 at December 31, 2003.
During February 2003, the Company granted 23,076 total shares of
non-vested stock to key personnel. The program was funded with cash and the
shares were purchased on the open market at the weighted-average grant price of
$27.53 per share. The grants of non-vested stock are forfeitable and, at the
time of the grant, vested at three years of service with the Company. The total
grant-date exercise price of the non-vested stock granted from January 1, 2003
through December 31, 2003 is $0.6 million. During 2003, 1,412 shares of
non-vested stock were forfeited with a total-grant date price of $0.03 million.
The outstanding share balance in the 2003 plan is 21,664 at December 31, 2003.
On February 24, 2003, the Company received 149,100 shares at a weighted
average price of $27.88 per share as consideration for the payment of payroll
taxes on the vesting of the non-vested stock grants to key personnel. On this
date, the vesting characteristics of the non-executive stock grants changed from
three year cliff vesting to ratable vesting over three years, one-third per
year.
Stock Grants to Executives
During 2001, the Company granted 75,749 shares of non-vested stock to
executive officers at a weighted-average grant price per share of $35.72. These
grants of non-vested stock are forfeitable and vest at three or five years of
service with the Company. The Company amortizes compensation expense for the
grant over the vesting period. Total amortization for the period ending December
31, 2003, 2002 and 2001, was $0.5 million, $0.5 million and $0.3 million,
respectively. The total grant-date price of the non-vested stock granted from
January 1, 2001 through December 31, 2001, is $2.7 million. During 2001, 14,000
shares of non-vested stock were forfeited with a total grant-date price of $0.5
million. There were no forfeitures in 2003 or 2002. The total outstanding share
balance of these grants is 61,749 at December 31, 2003.
During January 2002, the Company granted 550,000 shares of non-vested
stock to the Company's policy committee at a weighted-average grant price per
share of $41.62. These grants of non-vested stock are forfeitable and vest at
five years of service with the Company. The Company amortizes compensation
expense for the grant over the vesting period. Total amortization for the
periods ending December 31, 2003 and December 31, 2002 was $4.6 million and $4.6
million. The total grant-date price of the non-vested stock granted from January
1, 2002 through December 31, 2002, is $22.9 million. There were no forfeitures
of this grant during 2003 or 2002. The outstanding share balance of this grant
is 550,000 at December 31, 2003.
During February 2002, the Company granted 87,401 shares of non-vested
stock to executive officers at a weighted-average grant price per share of
$38.22. These grants of non-vested stock are forfeitable and vest at three years
of service with the Company. The total grant-date exercise price of the
non-vested stock granted from January 1, 2002 through December 31, 2002, is $3.3
million. There were no forfeitures of this grant during 2003 or 2002. The
outstanding share balance of this grant is 87,401 at December 31, 2003.
184
JOHN HANCOCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (CONTINUED)
Note 16--Stock Compensation Plans - (continued)
During January 2003, the Company granted 1,150,000 shares of non-vested
stock to the Company's policy committee at a weighted average grant price per
share of $28.65. These grants of non-vested stock are forfeitable and vest at
five years of service with the Company. The Company amortizes compensation
expense for the grant over the vesting period. Total amortization for the period
ending December 31, 2003 is $12.2 million. The total grant-date exercise price
of the non-vested stock granted from January 1, 2003 through December 31, 2003
is $32.9 million. During 2003, 245,646 shares of the January 2003 grant were
vested and exchanged to payoff loans under the Stock Ownership and Loan Program
and related income tax. The outstanding share balance of this grant is 904,354
at December 31, 2003.
During February 2003, the Company granted 27,305 total shares of
non-vested stock to the Company's policy committee. The program was funded with
cash and the shares were purchased from the Company at the weighted-average
grant price of $27.53 per share. The grants of non-vested stock are forfeitable
and vest at three years of service with the Company. The total grant-date
exercise price of the non-vested stock granted from January 1, 2003 through
December 31, 2003 is $0.8 million. There were no forfeitures of this grant
during 2003. The outstanding share balance in the 2003 plan is 27,305 at
December 31, 2003.
During February 2003, the Company's executives purchased 68,382 shares
from the Company at a weighted average price of $27.53. This purchase was not
made pursuant to the Long-Term Stock Incentive Plan and was not charged to the
remaining equity available under the plan. The transaction was executed at
market price to facilitate executives reaching required ownership levels.
Stock Grants to Board Members
During 2003 and 2002, the Company issued 11,158 and 7,504 shares to
Non-Employee Directors as payment of 25% and 50% of their quarterly retainer,
respectively. These shares are not forfeitable and vest immediately. The total
grant-date exercise price of this stock issued to non-employee directors from
January 1, 2003 through December 31, 2003 is $0.3 million, from January 1, 2002
through December 31, 2002 is $0.3 million and from January 1, 2001 through
December 31, 2001 is $0.1 million. In addition, in July 2001, the Company
implemented a plan that would allow directors, at their discretion, to invest
the second half of their quarterly retainer in the Company's common stock in
lieu of receiving cash. As of July 1, 2003 the Company will match any investment
at a rate of 25%. Prior to July 1, 2003 the Company matched investments at a
rate of 50%. The restricted stock given as matching shares is forfeitable and
vests over three years. For the period from July 1, 2001 through March 31, 2002,
the restricted stock given as matching shares was purchased on the open market.
As of April 1, 2002, the restricted stock given as matching shares is granted
from the Non-Employee Long-Term Stock Incentive Plan. At December 31, 2003 and
2002, 506 and 484 shares were matched under the program at a weighted-average
grant price per share of $29.53 and $36.22, respectively. Of 484 shares matched
in 2002, 120 were purchased on the open market and 364 were transferred from the
Non-Employee Directors' Long-Term Stock Incentive Plan. Total expense recognized
for the period ending December 31, 2003 and 2002 was $0.03 million and $0.04
million, respectively.
During May 2003, the Company issued 21,696 shares to the Board of
Directors as payment of their annual retainer. These grants of non-vested stock
are forfeitable and vest at five years of service with the Company. The Company
amortizes compensation expense for the grant over the vesting period. Total
amortization for the period ending December 31, 2003 was $0.1 million. There
were no forfeitures through December 31, 2003.
Stock Ownership and Loan Program. In January 2000, the Company adopted a
loan program whereby the Company may extend credit to key executives to purchase
stock in order for them to meet mandatory stock ownership requirements. These
full recourse loans bear interest at variable rates and principal and interest
are payable no later than the death of the executive, termination of employment
or five years. All loans under the stock ownership and loan program were paid
off as of March 4, 2003 through the acceleration of certain stock grants
described above. Pursuant to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, this program is no
longer actively lending on existing loans and the Company has ceased any further
lending under the program. As of December 31, 2002, these loans receivable
totaled $3.8 million and was recorded in other assets.
Stock Compensation Activity Subsequent to Year End
During February 2004, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors
approved stock and stock option grants to the Policy Committee and certain key
employees of the Company. The equity grants were made in compliance with the
terms of the Long-Term Stock Incentive Plan. A total of 312,500 shares of
non-vested stock was granted, with a total grant date
185
JOHN HANCOCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (CONTINUED)
Note 16--Stock Compensation Plans - (continued)
price of $12.9 million. A total of 3.2 million options were granted, with a
grant date fair value of $8.59 per option as determined by the Black-Scholes
option valuation model. Pursuant to the definitive merger agreement with
Manulife, no stock compensation grants made under the Incentive Plans subsequent
to September 28, 2003 (except for restricted stock and restricted deferred stock
units issued to non-employee directors on or before December 31, 2003) vest on
the potential change in control with Manulife. Accordingly, these stock
compensation grants will not vest as part of any change in control with
Manulife.
Note 17--Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
The Company recognizes purchased intangible assets which result from
business combinations; goodwill, the value of business acquired (VOBA), and
mutual fund investment management contracts acquired (management contracts). The
excess of the cost over the fair value of identifiable assets acquired in
business combinations is recorded as goodwill. The present value of estimated
future profits of insurance policies in force related to businesses acquired is
recorded as VOBA.
The management contract assets relate to the Company's mutual fund
subsidiary, John Hancock Funds (JH Funds) which purchased mutual fund investment
contracts as part of its plan to grow its mutual fund management business. These
contracts are identifiable intangible assets which are deemed to be indefinitely
renewable by the Company, and are therefore indefinite lived intangible assets
in accordance with SFAS No. 142.
The following tables set forth certain summarized financial information
relating to the Company's purchased intangible assets as of the dates and
periods indicated.
Accumulated
Gross Amortization Net
Carrying And Other Carrying
Amount Changes Amount
----------------------------------
(in millions)
December 31, 2003
Unamortizable intangible assets:
Goodwill............................ $424.5 $ (79.5) $ 345.0
Management contracts................ 13.3 (7.0) 6.3
Amortizable intangible assets:
VOBA................................ 585.1 (34.6) 550.5
December 31, 2002
Unamortizable intangible assets:
Goodwill............................ $ 334.1 $ (79.5) $ 254.6
Management contracts................ 12.2 (7.0) 5.2
Amortizable intangible assets:
VOBA................................ 499.8 (18.1) 481.7
For the Years Ended
December 31,
----------------------------------
2003 2002 2001
----------------------------------
(in millions)
Aggregate amortization expense
Goodwill amortization, net of tax of $--million, $--million and $3.6 million,
respectively.................................................................... -- -- $ 12.8
Management contract amortization, net of tax of $--million, $--million,
and $0.3 million, respectively.................................................. -- -- 0.7
VOBA amortization, net of tax of $1.4 million, $0.4 million and $(0.7) million,
respectively.................................................................... $ 3.0 $ 0.9 (2.2)
----------------------------------
Aggregate amortization expense, net of tax of $1.4 million, $0.4 million and
$3.2 million, respectively...................................................... $ 3.0 $ 0.9 $ 11.3
==================================
186
JOHN HANCOCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (CONTINUED)
Note 17--Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets - (continued)
Tax Effect Net Expense
---------- -----------
(in millions)
Estimated future aggregate amortization expense for the years ended December 31,
2004................................................................................. $ 5.2 $ 9.6
2005................................................................................. 5.1 9.5
2006................................................................................. 5.1 9.5
2007................................................................................. 4.7 8.7
2008................................................................................. 4.4 8.1
The changes in the carrying value of goodwill, presented for each business
segment, for the periods indicated, are as follows:
Asset Investment Maritime Corporate
Protection Gathering G&SFP Management Life and Other Consolidated
---------- --------- ----- ---------- ---- --------- ------------
(in millions)
Goodwill balance at January 1, 2003........ $ 66.1 $ 42.1 -- $ 0.4 $ 146.0 -- $ 254.6
Changes to goodwill during 2003:
Amortization......................... -- -- -- -- -- -- --
Goodwill acquired(1)................. -- -- -- -- 57.1 -- 57.1
Foreign currency translation
adjustment(2)..................... -- -- -- -- 33.3 -- 33.3
Other adjustments.................... -- -- -- -- -- -- --
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Goodwill balance at December 31, 2003...... $ 66.1 $ 42.1 -- $ 0.4 $ 236.4 -- $ 345.0
=====================================================================================
(1) Goodwill related to Maritime Life's acquisition of Liberty Health.
(2) Goodwill related to Maritime Life is subject to fluctuations in the value
of the Canadian Dollar relative to the US Dollar.
Asset Investment Maritime Corporate
Protection Gathering G&SFP Management Life and Other Consolidated
---------- --------- ----- ---------- ---- --------- ------------
(in millions)
Goodwill balance at January 1, 2002........ $ 73.5 $ 42.1 -- $ 0.4 $ 164.0 -- $ 280.0
Changes to goodwill during 2002:
Amortization......................... -- -- -- -- -- -- --
Goodwill acquired.................... -- -- -- -- -- -- --
Foreign currency translation
adjustment(1) .................... -- -- -- -- 1.9 -- 1.9
Other adjustments(2)(3) ............. (7.4) -- -- -- (19.9) -- (27.3)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Goodwill balance at December 31, 2002...... $ 66.1 $ 42.1 -- $ 0.4 $ 146.0 -- $ 254.6
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(1) Goodwill related to Maritime Life is subject to fluctuations in the value
of the Canadian Dollar relative to the US Dollar.
(2) Purchase price negotiations with Fortis, Inc. were concluded during the
first quarter of 2002, resulting in an adjustment of $(7.3) million to the
goodwill related to the Company's 1999 acquisition of Fortis' long-term
care insurance business. Legal fees associated with these negotiations
were finalized in the second quarter of 2002, resulting in a further
adjustment to goodwill of $(0.1) million.
(3) An adjustment of $(19.9) million was made to previously recorded goodwill
relating to RSAF, to reflect refinements in methods and assumptions
implemented upon finalization of transition to Maritime Life valuation
systems.
187
JOHN HANCOCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (CONTINUED)
Note 17--Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets - (continued)
The changes in the carrying value of VOBA, presented for each business
segment, for the periods indicated, are as follows:
Asset Investment Maritime Corporate
Protection Gathering G&SFP Management Life and Other Consolidated
---------- --------- ----- ---------- ---- --------- ------------
(in millions)
VOBA balance at January 1, 2003............ $ 244.1 -- -- -- $ 237.6 -- $ 481.7
Amortization and other changes
during 2003:
Amortization......................... (12.7) -- -- -- 8.3 -- (4.4)
VOBA acquired (1).................... -- -- -- -- 25.4 -- 25.4
Adjustment to unrealized gains on
securities available for sale...... (2.8) -- -- -- (9.3) -- (12.1)
Foreign currency translation
adjustment (2)..................... -- 55.7 55.7
Other adjustments(3)................. 4.2 -- -- -- -- -- 4.2
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
VOBA balance at December 31, 2003.......... $ 232.8 -- -- -- $ 317.7 -- $ 550.5
=======================================================================================
(1) VOBA related to Maritime Life's acquisition of Liberty Health.
(2) VOBA related to Maritime Life is subject to fluctuations in the value of
the Canadian Dollar relative to the US Dollar.
(3) An adjustment of $4.2 million was made to previously recorded VOBA
relating to Allmerica, to reflect refinements in methods and assumptions
implemented upon finalization of transition.
Asset Investment Maritime Corporate
Protection Gathering G&SFP Management Life and Other Consolidated
---------- --------- ----- ---------- ---- --------- ------------
(in millions)
VOBA balance at January 1, 2002............ $ 145.1 -- -- -- $ 245.6 -- $ 390.7
Amortization and other changes
during 2002:
Amortization......................... (5.1) -- -- -- 3.8 -- (1.3)
VOBA acquired (1).................... 104.3 -- -- -- -- -- 104.3
Adjustment to unrealized gains on
securities available for sale..... (0.2) -- -- -- (9.4) -- (9.6)
Foreign currency translation
adjustment (2)..................... -- -- -- -- 3.1 -- 3.1
Other adjustments(3)................. -- -- -- -- (5.5) -- (5.5)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
VOBA balance at December 31, 2002.......... $ 244.1 -- -- -- $ 237.6 -- $ 481.7
======================================================================================
- ----------
(1) VOBA related to the acquisition of Allmerica Financial Corporation.
(2) VOBA related to Maritime Life is subject to fluctuations in the value of
the Canadian Dollar relative to the US Dollar.
(3) An adjustment of $(5.5) million was made to previously recorded VOBA
relating to RSAF, to reflect refinements in methods and assumptions
implemented upon finalization of transition to Maritime Life valuation
systems.
188
JOHN HANCOCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (CONTINUED)
Note 17--Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets - (continued)
The changes in the carrying value of management contracts, presented for
each business segment, for the periods indicated, are as follows:
Asset Investment Maritime Corporate
Protection Gathering G&SFP Management Life and Other Consolidated
---------- --------- ----- ---------- ---- --------- ------------
(in millions)
Management contracts balance at
January 1, 2003 .......................... -- $5.2 -- -- -- -- $5.2
Amortization and other changes
during 2003:
Amortization.......................... -- -- -- -- -- -- --
Management contracts acquired(1)...... -- 1.1 -- -- -- -- 1.1
Other adjustments..................... -- -- -- -- -- -- --
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Management contracts balance at
December 31, 2003.......................... -- $6.3 -- -- -- -- $6.3
===================================================================================
(1) This increase results from JH Fund's purchases of the management contracts
for the US Global Leaders Fund, Classic Value Fund, and Large Cap Select
Fund in 2003.
Asset Investment Maritime Corporate
Protection Gathering G&SFP Management Life and Other Consolidated
---------- --------- ----- ---------- ---- --------- ------------
(in millions)
Management contracts balance at
January 1, 2002........................... -- $2.0 -- -- -- -- $2.0
Amortization and other changes
during 2002:
Amortization.......................... -- -- -- -- -- -- --
Management contracts acquired(1)...... -- 3.2 -- -- -- -- 3.2
Other adjustments..................... -- -- -- -- -- -- --
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Management contracts balance at
December 31, 2002........................... -- $5.2 -- -- -- -- $5.2
====================================================================================
(1) This increase results from JH Fund's purchases of the management contracts
for the U.S. Global Leaders Growth Funds and the Classic Value Fund in
2002.
189
JOHN HANCOCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (CONTINUED)
Note 17--Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets - (continued)
The net income of the Company, if the Company had not amortized goodwill
and management contracts prior to the adoption of SFAS No. 142, would have been
as follows:
Years Ended December 31,
-----------------------------------
2003 2002 2001
-----------------------------------
(in millions, except per-share data)
Net income:
As reported........................................... $ 806.0 $ 499.5 $ 618.7
Goodwill amortization, net of tax..................... -- -- 12.8
Management contract amortization, net of tax.......... -- -- 0.7
-----------------------------------
Proforma (unaudited).................................. $ 806.0 $ 499.5 $ 632.2
-----------------------------------
Basic earnings per common share:
As reported........................................... $ 2.80 $ 1.71 $ 2.03
Goodwill amortization, net of tax..................... -- -- 0.04
Management contract amortization, net of tax.......... -- -- 0.01
-----------------------------------
Proforma (unaudited).................................. $ 2.80 $ 1.71 $ 2.08
-----------------------------------
Diluted earnings per common share:
As reported........................................... $ 2.79 $ 1.70 $ 2.01
Goodwill amortization, net of tax..................... -- -- 0.04
Management contract amortization, net of tax(1)....... -- -- 0.00
-----------------------------------
Proforma (unaudited).................................. $ 2.79 $ 1.70 $ 2.05
-----------------------------------
- ----------
(1) Rounds to $0.00 in 2001
Note 18--Information Provided in Connection with Market Value Annuity of John
Hancock Variable Life Insurance Company
The following condensed consolidating financial statements are provided in
compliance with Regulation S-X of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
"Commission") and in accordance with Rule 12h-5 of the Commission.
John Hancock Variable Life Insurance Company (the Variable Company) is a
wholly-owned subsidiary of JHFS. The Variable Company sells deferred annuity
contracts, which are registered products with the Commission and which feature a
market value adjustment. As of December 31, 2003, JHFS provides a full and
unconditional guarantee of the Variable Company's obligation to pay amounts due
to contractholders on surrender, withdrawal or annuitization of the Variable
Company's deferred annuity contracts' market value adjustment interest. In
addition, JHFS guarantees all Variable Company's future issues of deferred
annuity contracts with market value adjustments.
JHFS is an insurance holding company. The assets of JHFS consist primarily
of the outstanding capital stock of the Life Company, John Hancock Canadian
Holding Company and investments in other international subsidiaries. JHFS' cash
flow primarily consists of dividends from its operating subsidiaries and
proceeds from debt offerings (see Note 7--Debt and Line of Credit) offset by
expenses, shareholder dividends and stock repurchases. As a holding company, the
Company's ability to meet its cash requirements, including, but not limited to,
paying interest on any debt, paying expenses related to its affairs, paying
dividends on its common stock and any board of directors approved repurchase of
its common stock pursuant to the board of director's approved plan,
substantially depends upon dividends from its operating subsidiaries.
State insurance laws generally restrict the ability of insurance companies
to pay cash dividends in excess of prescribed limitations without prior
approval. The Life Company, which pays dividends to JHFS, is limited to the
greatest of 10% of its statutory surplus or its prior calendar year's statutory
net gain from operations. The ability of the Life Company, JHFS' primary
operating subsidiary, to pay shareholder dividends is and will continue to be
subject to restrictions set forth in the insurance laws and regulations of
Massachusetts, its domiciliary state. The Massachusetts insurance law limits how
and when the Life Company can pay shareholder dividends. The Life Company, in
the future, might also be commercially domiciled in New York. If so, dividend
payments would be subject to New York's holding company act as well as
Massachusetts law. JHFS currently does not expect such regulatory requirements
to impair its ability to meet its liquidity and capital needs. However, JHFS can
give no assurance it will declare or pay dividends on a regular basis.
190
JOHN HANCOCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (CONTINUED)
Note 18--Information Provided in Connection with Market Value Annuity of John
Hancock Variable Life Insurance Company - (continued)
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING BALANCE SHEETS
December 31, 2003
----------------------------------------------------------------------
John Hancock
John Variable Consolidated
Hancock Life John
Financial Insurance Hancock
Services Company Other Financial
(Guarantor) (Issuer) Subsidiaries Eliminations Services, Inc.
----------- -------- ------------ ------------ --------------
(in millions)
Assets:
Invested assets ............................................. $ 5.0 $ 4,810.2 $67,704.9 $ 533.0 $ 73,053.1
Cash and cash equivalents ................................... 17.6 49.4 3,036.3 18.3 3,121.6
Investment in unconsolidated subsidiaries ................... 9,045.1 124.6 -- (9,169.7) --
Other assets ................................................ 161.5 1,581.7 9,469.9 (209.2) 11,003.9
Separate account assets ..................................... -- 6,881.9 17,240.0 -- 24,121.9
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Assets ............................................. $9,229.2 $13,447.8 $97,451.1 $(8,827.6) $111,300.5
=====================================================================
Liabilities:
Insurance liabilities and Consumer Notes .................... -- $ 4,715.0 $66,822.2 $ 438.1 71,975.3
Debt ........................................................ $ 975.3 -- 1,015.0 (95.0) 1,895.3
Other liabilities ........................................... 38.2 598.1 4,421.2 (125.6) 4,931.9
Separate account liabilities ................................ -- 6,881.9 17,240.0 -- 24,121.9
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Liabilities ........................................ 1,013.5 12,195.0 89,498.4 217.5 102,924.4
Preferred shareholders' equity in subsidiary companies ...... -- -- 160.4 -- 160.4
Shareholders' equity(1) ..................................... 8,215.7 1,252.8 7,792.3 (9,045.1) 8,215.7
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Liabilities, Preferred Shareholders' Equity in
Subsidiary Companies and Shareholders' Equity(1) ...... $9,229.2 $13,447.8 $97,451.1 $(8,827.6) $111,300.5
=====================================================================
(1) Shareholders' equity includes common stock of JHFS at $0.01 par value per
share, 2.0 billion shares authorized, 319.8 million and 317.5 million
shares issued as of December 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively, and JHFS
treasury stock at a cost of $1,069.0 million or 30.0 million shares, and
$1,057.2 million or 29.5 million shares as of December 31, 2003 and 2002,
respectively.
191
JOHN HANCOCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (CONTINUED)
Note 18--Information Provided in Connection with Market Value Annuity of John
Hancock Variable Life Insurance Company - (continued)
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING BALANCE SHEETS - (CONTINUED)
December 31, 2002
----------------------------------------------------------------------
John Hancock
John Variable Consolidated
Hancock Life John
Financial Insurance Hancock
Services Company Other Financial
(Guarantor) (Issuer) Subsidiaries Eliminations Services, Inc.
----------- -------- ------------ ------------ --------------
(in millions)
Assets:
Invested assets ............................................ -- $ 3,703.0 $61,693.4 $ 541.1 $65,937.5
Cash and cash equivalents .................................. $ 14.6 200.7 973.1 2.2 1,190.6
Investment in unconsolidated subsidiaries .................. 7,003.7 112.2 -- (7,115.9) --
Other assets ............................................... 25.7 1,485.9 8,444.0 (46.9) 9,908.7
Separate account assets .................................... -- 5,883.7 14,943.6 -- 20,827.3
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Assets ............................................ $7,044.0 $11,385.5 $86,054.1 $(6,619.5) $97,864.1
====================================================================
Liabilities:
Insurance liabilities and Consumer Notes ................... -- $ 3,888.8 $60,348.1 $ 451.8 $64,688.7
Debt ....................................................... $ 813.2 -- 1,051.0 (65.0) 1,799.2
Other liabilities .......................................... 19.7 524.1 3,633.9 (2.6) 4,175.1
Separate account liabilities ............................... -- 5,883.7 14,943.6 -- 20,827.3
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Liabilities ....................................... 832.9 10,296.6 79,976.6 384.2 91,490.3
Preferred shareholders' equity in subsidiary companies ..... -- -- 162.7 -- 162.7
Shareholders' equity(1) .................................... 6,211.1 1,088.9 5,914.8 (7,003.7) 6,211.1
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Liabilities, Preferred Shareholders' Equity in
Subsidiary Companies and Shareholders' Equity(1) ..... $7,044.0 $11,385.5 $86,054.1 $(6,619.5) $97,864.1
====================================================================
192
JOHN HANCOCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (CONTINUED)
Note 18--Information Provided in Connection with Market Value Annuity of John
Hancock Variable Life Insurance Company - (continued)
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENTS OF INCOME
For the Year Ended December 31, 2003
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
John Hancock
John Hancock Variable Life Consolidated
Financial Insurance John Hancock
Services Company Other Financial
(Guarantor) (Issuer) Subsidiaries Eliminations Services, Inc.
----------- -------- ------------ ------------ --------------
(in millions)
Revenues
Premiums ................................ -- $ 66.6 $ 4,080.5 $ 0.6 $ 4,147.7
Universal life and investment-type
product charges ...................... -- 366.9 471.2 0.8 838.9
Net investment income ................... $ 0.2 281.8 3,910.5 34.5 4,227.0
Net realized investment and other
gains (losses), net .................. -- (21.4) 58.4 (3.4) 33.6
Investment management revenues,
commissions and other fees ........... -- -- 532.4 -- 532.4
Other revenue ........................... -- 0.2 291.5 -- 291.7
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total revenues .......................... 0.2 694.1 9,344.5 32.5 10,071.3
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benefits and expenses
Benefits to policyholders ............... -- 316.8 5,746.4 21.1 6,084.3
Other operating costs and expenses ...... 49.7 94.7 1,609.6 1.7 1,755.7
Amortization of deferred policy
acquisition costs .................... -- 104.7 210.7 0.1 315.5
Dividends to policyholders .............. -- 17.5 549.4 -- 566.9
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total benefits and expenses ............. 49.7 533.7 8,116.1 22.9 8,722.4
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Income (loss) before income taxes ............. (49.5) 160.4 1,228.4 9.6 1,348.9
Income taxes .................................. (24.0) 52.6 344.9 3.2 376.7
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net income (loss) after taxes ........... (25.5) 107.8 883.5 6.4 972.2
Cumulative effect of accounting changes,
net of income tax .......................... -- (6.5) (159.7) -- (166.2)
Equity in the net income of unconsolidated
subsidiaries ............................... 831.5 6.4 -- (837.9) --
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net income .................................... $806.0 $107.7 $ 723.8 $(831.5) $ 806.0
==========================================================================
193
JOHN HANCOCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (CONTINUED)
Note 18--Information Provided in Connection with Market Value Annuity of John
Hancock Variable Life Insurance Company - (continued)
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENTS OF INCOME - (CONTINUED)
For the Year Ended December 31, 2002
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
John Hancock
John Hancock Variable Life Consolidated
Financial Insurance John Hancock
Services Company Other Financial
(Guarantor) (Issuer) Subsidiaries Eliminations Services, Inc.
----------- -------- ------------ ------------ --------------
(in millions)
Revenues
Premiums .................................. -- $ 58.0 $3,318.6 $ 0.5 $3,377.1
Universal life and investment-type
product charges ........................ -- 355.2 459.2 0.8 815.2
Net investment income ..................... $ 0.8 234.3 3,663.2 35.8 3,934.1
Net realized investment and other gains
(losses), net .......................... -- (26.5) (433.9) 5.7 (454.7)
Investment management revenues,
commissions and other fees ............. -- -- 550.7 -- 550.7
Other revenue ............................. 0.1 1.2 254.3 0.1 255.7
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total revenues ............................ 0.9 622.2 7,812.1 42.9 8,478.1
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benefits and expenses
Benefits to policyholders ................. -- 320.5 5,043.6 23.6 5,387.7
Other operating costs and expenses ........ 57.5 67.5 1,392.1 1.5 1,518.6
Amortization of deferred policy
acquisition costs ...................... -- 59.9 290.2 0.1 350.2
Dividends to policyholders ................ -- 18.8 566.6 -- 585.4
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total benefits and expenses ............... 57.5 466.7 7,292.5 25.2 7,841.9
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Income (loss) before income taxes ............... (56.6) 155.5 519.6 17.7 636.2
Income taxes .................................... (25.6) 52.3 103.9 6.1 136.7
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net income (loss) after taxes ............. (31.0) 103.2 415.7 11.6 499.5
Equity in the net income of
unconsolidated subsidiaries .................. 530.5 11.6 -- (542.1) --
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net income ...................................... $499.5 $114.8 $ 415.7 $(530.5) $ 499.5
=========================================================================
194
JOHN HANCOCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (CONTINUED)
Note 18--Information Provided in Connection with Market Value Annuity of John
Hancock Variable Life Insurance Company - (continued)
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENTS OF INCOME - (CONTINUED)
For the Year Ended December 31, 2001
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
John Hancock
John Hancock Variable Life Consolidated
Financial Insurance John Hancock
Services Company Other Financial
(Guarantor) (Issuer) Subsidiaries Eliminations Services, Inc.
----------- -------- ------------ ------------ --------------
(in millions)
Revenues
Premiums .............................. -- $ 59.0 $3,791.2 $ 1.1 $3,851.3
Universal life and investment-type
product charges .................... -- 364.6 407.1 0.8 772.5
Net investment income ................. $ 5.4 189.4 3,712.5 37.6 3,944.9
Net realized investment and other
gains (losses), net ................ -- (5.5) (240.1) (3.5) (249.1)
Investment management revenues,
commissions and other fees ......... -- -- 624.4 -- 624.4
Other revenue ......................... 0.1 24.0 162.4 -- 186.5
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total revenues ........................ 5.5 631.5 8,457.5 36.0 9,130.5
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benefits and expenses
Benefits to policyholders ............. -- 270.1 5,610.6 24.0 5,904.7
Other operating costs and expenses .... 38.8 74.0 1,406.6 2.2 1,521.6
Amortization of deferred policy
acquisition costs .................. -- 66.9 239.7 0.2 306.8
Dividends to policyholders ............ -- 21.4 549.9 -- 571.3
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total benefits and expenses ........... 38.8 432.4 7,806.8 26.4 8,304.4
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Income (loss) before income taxes ........... (33.3) 199.1 650.7 9.6 826.1
Income taxes ................................ (14.4) 60.2 166.8 2.0 214.6
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net income (loss) before cumulative
effect of accounting changes ....... (18.9) 138.9 483.9 7.6 611.5
Cumulative effect of accounting changes,
net of income tax ........................ -- (1.6) 8.8 -- 7.2
Equity in the net income of unconsolidated
subsidiaries ............................. 637.6 7.6 -- (645.2) --
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net income .................................. $618.7 $ 144.9 $ 492.7 $(637.6) $ 618.7
============================================================================
195
JOHN HANCOCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (CONTINUED)
Note 18--Information Provided in Connection with Market Value Annuity of John
Hancock Variable Life Insurance Company - (continued)
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For the Year Ended December 31, 2003
--------------------------------------------------------------------
John Hancock Consolidated
John Hancock Variable Life John Hancock
Financial Insurance Financial
Services Company Other Services,
(Guarantor) (Issuer) Subsidiaries Eliminations Inc.
----------- -------- ------------ ------------ ---------
(in millions)
Net income ................................................. $ 806.0 $ 107.7 $ 723.8 $ (831.5) $ 806.0
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided
by operating activities:
Amortization of discount-fixed maturities ............ -- (10.7) (12.3) -- (23.0)
Equity in net income of unconsolidated subsidiaries .. (831.5) (6.4) -- 837.9 --
Net realized investment and other losses (gains) ..... -- 21.4 (58.4) 3.4 (33.6)
Change in accounting principle ....................... -- -- 166.2 -- 166.2
Change in deferred policy acquisition costs .......... -- (49.7) (368.5) 0.1 (418.1)
Depreciation and amortization ........................ 1.6 1.8 50.7 -- 54.1
Net cash flows from trading securities ............... -- -- (175.4) -- (175.4)
(Increase)decrease in accrued investment income ...... -- (1.1) 30.0 1.0 29.9
Decrease (increase) in premiums and accounts
receivable ......................................... 3.8 (1.0) (59.6) 0.3 (56.5)
Decrease (increase) in other assets and other
liabilities, net ................................... 59.9 (64.1) (314.8) 2.2 (316.8)
Increase in policy liabilities and accruals, net ..... -- 198.1 2,828.8 18.5 3,045.4
(Decrease)increase in income taxes ................... (36.3) 36.0 (24.3) (0.9) (25.5)
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Net cash provided by operating activities .................. 3.5 232.0 2,786.2 31.0 3,052.7
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Cash flows from investing activities:
Sales of:
Fixed maturities available-for-sale .................. -- 660.3 11,411.6 29.8 12,101.7
Equity securities available-for-sale ................. -- 35.3 393.0 3.0 431.3
Real estate .......................................... -- 5.8 169.5 -- 175.3
Short term investments and other invested assets ..... -- 31.6 491.6 -- 523.2
Home office properties ............................... -- -- 887.6 -- 887.6
Maturities, prepayments, and scheduled redemptions of:
Fixed maturities held-to-maturity .................... -- 3.1 223.4 1.0 227.5
Fixed maturities available-for-sale .................. -- 196.3 3,377.8 44.8 3,618.9
Short term investments and other invested assets ..... -- 0.1 817.2 -- 817.3
Mortgage loans on real estate ........................ -- 86.7 1,409.4 16.2 1,512.3
Purchases of:
Fixed maturities held-to-maturity .................... -- (1.1) (68.4) -- (69.5)
Fixed maturities available-for-sale .................. -- (1,568.7) (17,557.4) (56.3) (19,182.4)
Equity securities available-for-sale ................. -- (60.4) (224.5) -- (284.9)
Real estate .......................................... -- (0.2) (40.7) -- (40.9)
Short term investments and other invested assets ..... (5.0) (91.0) (1,734.5) (2.9) (1,833.4)
Mortgage loans on real estate issued ................. -- (305.3) (2,085.9) (16.1) (2,407.3)
Net cash paid related to acquisition/ sale of
businesses ......................................... -- -- (24.0) -- (24.0)
Other, net ........................................... -- (8.9) (91.3) (2.1) (102.3)
Capital contributed to unconsolidated subsidiaries ... (114.3) -- -- 114.3 --
Dividends received from unconsolidated subsidiaries .. 100.0 -- -- (100.0) --
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Net cash used in investing activities ...................... (19.3) (1,016.4) (2,645.6) 31.7 (3,649.6)
--------------------------------------------------------------------
196
JOHN HANCOCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (CONTINUED)
Note 18--Information Provided in Connection with Market Value Annuity of John
Hancock Variable Life Insurance Company - (continued)
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS - (CONTINUED)
For the Year Ended December 31, 2003
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
John Hancock Consolidated
John Hancock Variable Life John Hancock
Financial Insurance Financial
Services Company Other Services,
(Guarantor) (Issuer) Subsidiaries Eliminations Inc.
----------- -------- ------------ ------------ ----
(in millions)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Capital contributions paid by parent ......... -- -- $ 114.3 $ (114.3) --
Acquisition of treasury stock ................ $ (11.8) -- -- -- $ (11.8)
Dividends paid on common stock ............... (101.3) -- -- -- (101.3)
Dividends paid to parent ..................... -- -- (100.0) 100.0 --
Universal life and investment-type contract
deposits ................................... -- $ 1,097.2 7,090.9 -- 8,188.1
Universal life and investment-type contract
maturities and withdrawals ................. -- (464.1) (6,722.1) (32.3) (7,218.5)
Issuance of consumer notes ................... -- -- 1,260.2 -- 1,260.2
Increase in bank deposits .................... -- -- 293.9 -- 293.9
Issuance of short-term debt .................. -- 196.6 148.9 (196.6) 148.9
Repayment of short-term debt ................. -- (196.6) (158.0) 196.6 (158.0)
Repayment of long-term debt .................. -- -- (5.5) -- (5.5)
Net increase in commercial paper ............. 131.9 -- -- -- 131.9
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net cash provided by financing activities .......... 18.8 633.1 1,922.6 (46.6) 2,527.9
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash
equivalents ................................ 3.0 (151.3) 2,063.2 16.1 1,931.0
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year ..... 14.6 200.7 973.1 2.2 1,190.6
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year ........... $ 17.6 $ 49.4 $ 3,036.3 $ 18.3 $ 3,121.6
=========================================================================
197
JOHN HANCOCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (CONTINUED)
Note 18--Information Provided in Connection with Market Value Annuity of John
Hancock Variable Life Insurance Company - (continued)
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS - (CONTINUED)
For the Year Ended December 31, 2002
---------------------------------------------------------------------
John Hancock Consolidated
John Hancock Variable Life John Hancock
Financial Insurance Financial
Services Company Other Services,
(Guarantor) (Issuer) Subsidiaries Eliminations Inc.
----------- -------- ------------ ------------ ----
(in millions)
Net income ................................................. $ 499.5 $ 114.8 $ 415.7 $ (530.5) $ 499.5
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash
provided by (used in) operating activities:
Amortization of discount-fixed maturities ............ -- 0.3 (116.3) (0.6) (116.6)
Equity in net income of unconsolidated subsidiaries .. (530.5) (11.6) -- 542.1 --
Net realized investment and other (gains) losses ..... -- 26.5 433.9 (5.7) 454.7
Change in deferred policy acquisition costs .......... -- (124.7) (219.9) 0.1 (344.5)
Depreciation and amortization ........................ 0.7 0.2 57.9 1.1 59.9
Net cash flows from trading securities ............... -- -- 5.4 -- 5.4
(Increase) decrease in accrued investment income ..... -- (9.0) 5.5 (0.3) (3.8)
Decrease in premiums and accounts receivable ......... -- 8.3 28.0 0.4 36.7
Decrease (increase) in other assets and other
liabilities, net ................................... 63.4 (23.1) (317.1) 60.1 (216.7)
(Decrease) increase in policy liabilities and
accruals, net ...................................... -- (77.1) 2,176.0 23.8 2,122.7
Increase in income taxes ............................. 15.4 33.9 14.9 (0.4) 63.8
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities ........ 48.5 (61.5) 2,484.0 90.1 2,561.1
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Cash flows from investing activities:
Sales of:
Fixed maturities available-for-sale .................. -- 432.0 5,377.8 28.2 5,838.0
Equity securities available-for-sale ................. -- 6.2 362.8 1.2 370.2
Real estate .......................................... -- 0.3 129.6 -- 129.9
Short term investments and other invested assets ..... -- -- 460.1 -- 460.1
Maturities, prepayments, and scheduled redemptions of:
Fixed maturities held-to-maturity .................... -- 2.3 213.4 0.9 216.6
Fixed maturities available-for-sale .................. -- 126.5 2,745.5 29.2 2,901.2
Short term investments and other invested assets ..... -- 22.1 307.0 2.8 331.9
Mortgage loans on real estate ........................ -- 59.6 1,577.8 31.1 1,668.5
Purchases of:
Fixed maturities held-to-maturity .................... -- (3.0) (24.5) (0.1) (27.6)
Fixed maturities available-for-sale .................. -- (1,098.9) (13,262.4) (75.6) (14,436.9)
Equity securities available-for-sale ................. -- (3.5) (166.9) (0.4) (170.8)
Real estate .......................................... -- (0.1) (14.0) -- (14.1)
Short term investments and other invested assets ..... -- (65.3) (1,483.7) (8.0) (1,557.0)
Mortgage loans on real estate issued ................. -- (150.5) (2,178.2) (19.9) (2,348.6)
Other, net ........................................... -- (23.3) (65.4) 13.2 (75.5)
Capital contributed to unconsolidated subsidiaries ... (91.5) -- -- 91.5 --
Dividends received from unconsolidated subsidiaries .. 111.0 -- -- (111.0) --
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities ........ 19.5 (695.6) (6,021.1) (16.9) (6,714.1)
--------------------------------------------------------------------
198
JOHN HANCOCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (CONTINUED)
Note 18--Information Provided in Connection with Market Value Annuity of John
Hancock Variable Life Insurance Company - (continued)
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS - (CONTINUED)
For the Year Ended December 31, 2002
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
John Hancock Consolidated
John Hancock Variable Life John Hancock
Financial Insurance Financial
Services Company Other Services,
(Guarantor) (Issuer) Subsidiaries Eliminations Inc.
----------- -------- ------------ ------------ ---------
(in millions)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Capital contributions paid by parent .............. -- -- $ 91.5 $ (91.5) --
Acquisition of treasury stock ..................... $ (385.0) -- -- -- $ (385.0)
Dividends paid on common stock .................... (92.2) -- (111.0) 111.0 (92.2)
Universal life and investment-type
contract deposits ............................... -- $ 1,232.1 8,408.9 -- 9,641.0
Universal life and investment-type contract
maturities and withdrawals ...................... -- (382.7) (5,311.1) (32.5) (5,726.3)
Issuance of preferred stock ....................... -- -- 61.9 -- 61.9
Issuance of consumer notes ........................ -- -- 290.2 -- 290.2
Issuance of long-term debt ........................ 65.0 -- 20.0 (65.0) 20.0
Issuance of short-term debt ....................... -- -- 92.8 -- 92.8
Repayment of short-term debt ...................... -- -- (67.0) -- (67.0)
Repayment of long-term debt ....................... -- -- (54.9) -- (54.9)
Net increase in commercial paper .................. 249.4 -- -- -- 249.4
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities ..... (162.8) 849.4 3,421.3 (78.0) 4,029.9
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash
equivalents ..................................... (94.8) 92.3 (115.8) (4.8) (123.1)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year .......... 109.4 108.4 1,088.9 7.0 1,313.7
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year ................ $ 14.6 $ 200.7 $ 973.1 $ 2.2 $ 1,190.6
=======================================================================
199
JOHN HANCOCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (CONTINUED)
Note 18--Information Provided in Connection with Market Value Annuity of John
Hancock Variable Life Insurance Company - (continued)
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS - (CONTINUED)
For the Year Ended December 31, 2001
-----------------------------------------------------------------
John Hancock Consolidated
John Hancock Variable Life John Hancock
Financial Insurance Financial
Services Company Other Services,
(Guarantor) (Issuer) Subsidiaries Eliminations Inc.
----------- -------- ------------ ------------ ---------
(in millions)
Net income .................................................... $ 618.7 $ 144.9 $ 492.7 $ (637.6) $ 618.7
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash (used in)
provided by operating activities:
Amortization of discount-fixed maturities ............... -- 0.7 (160.5) (1.1) (160.9)
Equity in net income of unconsolidated subsidiaries ..... (637.6) (7.6) -- 645.2 --
Net realized investment and other losses ................ -- 5.5 240.1 3.5 249.1
Change in accounting principle .......................... -- -- (7.2) -- (7.2)
Change in deferred policy acquisition costs ............. -- (74.2) (200.0) 0.1 (274.1)
Depreciation and amortization ........................... 0.3 (1.3) 79.0 1.6 79.6
Net cash flows from trading securities .................. -- -- (69.4) -- (69.4)
Increase in accrued investment income ................... -- (8.3) (30.2) (0.3) (38.8)
Increase in premiums and accounts receivable ............ -- (4.7) (9.5) (0.8) (15.0)
Increase in other assets and other liabilities, net ..... (34.1) (159.1) (304.0) 43.5 (453.7)
Increase in policy liabilities and accruals, net ........ -- 265.3 2,183.0 23.8 2,472.1
(Decrease) increase in income taxes ..................... (10.6) 116.8 125.3 1.9 233.4
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities .......... (63.3) 278.0 2,339.3 79.8 2,633.8
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Cash flows from investing activities:
Sales of:
Fixed maturities available-for-sale ..................... -- 162.6 16,744.9 22.0 16,929.5
Equity securities available-for-sale .................... -- 3.3 610.5 2.7 616.5
Real estate ............................................. -- 3.3 54.0 -- 57.3
Short term investments and other invested assets ........ -- -- 153.3 -- 153.3
Maturities, prepayments, and scheduled redemptions of:
Fixed maturities held-to-maturity ....................... -- 2.4 239.3 2.1 243.8
Fixed maturities available-for-sale ..................... -- 139.8 3,031.5 40.6 3,211.9
Short term investments and other invested assets ........ -- 46.1 167.5 0.4 214.0
Mortgage loans on real estate ........................... -- 42.0 1,509.3 24.4 1,575.7
Purchases of:
Fixed maturities held-to-maturity ....................... -- (5.0) (61.6) (0.1) (66.7)
Fixed maturities available-for-sale ..................... -- (1,012.5) (26,037.5) (99.8) (27,149.8)
Equity securities available-for-sale .................... -- (4.1) (361.2) (2.0) (367.3)
Real estate ............................................. -- (0.6) (52.9) -- (53.5)
Short term investments and other invested assets ........ -- (37.5) (497.6) (2.1) (537.2)
Mortgage loans on real estate issued .................... -- (80.4) (1,492.9) (4.6) (1,577.9)
Net cash paid related to acquisition of business ........ -- -- (132.5) -- (132.5)
Other, net .............................................. -- (25.1) 125.6 (0.5) 100.0
Capital contributed to unconsolidated subsidiaries ...... (6.8) -- -- 6.8 --
Dividends received from unconsolidated subsidiaries ..... 250.0 -- -- (250.0) --
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities ........... 243.2 (765.7) (6,000.3) (260.1) (6,782.9)
-----------------------------------------------------------------
200
JOHN HANCOCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (CONTINUED)
Note 18--Information Provided in Connection with Market Value Annuity of John
Hancock Variable Life Insurance Company - (continued)
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS - (CONTINUED)
For the Year Ended December 31, 2001
------------------------------------------------------------------------
John Hancock Consolidated
John Hancock Variable Life John Hancock
Financial Insurance Financial
Services Company Other Services,
(Guarantor) (Issuer) Subsidiaries Eliminations Inc.
----------- -------- ------------ ------------ ---------
(in millions)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Capital contributions paid by parent ............ -- -- $ 6.8 $ (6.8) --
Acquisition of treasury stock ................... $ (580.4) -- -- -- $ (580.4)
Dividends paid on common stock .................. (92.4) -- (250.0) 250.0 (92.4)
Universal life and investment-type contract
deposits ...................................... -- $ 1,220.5 9,534.7 0.2 10,755.4
Universal life and investment-type contract
maturities and withdrawals .................... -- (877.1) (7,516.4) (37.1) (8,430.6)
Issuance of short-term debt ..................... -- -- 56.9 -- 56.9
Repayment of short-term debt .................... -- -- (18.3) -- (18.3)
Issuance of long-term debt ...................... 495.8 -- 292.0 (43.6) 744.2
Repayment of long-term debt ..................... -- -- (29.7) -- (29.7)
Net decrease in commercial paper ................ -- -- (222.3) -- (222.3)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities ... (177.0) 343.4 1,853.7 162.7 2,182.8
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash
equivalents ................................... 2.9 (144.3) (1,807.3) (17.6) (1,966.3)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year ........ 106.5 252.7 2,896.2 24.6 3,280.0
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year .............. $ 109.4 $ 108.4 $ 1,088.9 $ 7.0 $ 1,313.7
========================================================================
201
JOHN HANCOCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (CONTINUED)
Note 19--Quarterly Results of Operations (unaudited)
The following is a summary of unaudited quarterly results of operations
for 2003 and 2002:
2003 2002
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
March June September December March June September December
(in millions, except per share data)
Premiums and other considerations(a) .. $ 958.8 $1,043.4 $1,173.2 $1,504.7 $ 890.2 $1,106.2 $ 936.0 $ 995.4
Net investment income ................. 1,029.3 1,049.3 1,038.5 1,109.9 969.9 979.1 968.6 1,016.5
Net realized investment and other
gains (losses), net of related
amortization of deferred policy
acquisition costs, amounts
credited to participating
pension contractholders, and the
policyholder dividend obligation .... 62.6 89.8 (58.3) (60.5) (85.7) (139.0) (30.7) (199.3)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total revenues ........................ 2,326.3 2,447.8 2,430.1 2,867.1 2,045.8 2,202.4 2,142.9 2,087.0
Benefits and expenses(a) .............. 1,968.4 2,033.7 2,187.9 2,532.4 1,847.5 2,078.1 1,931.4 1,984.9
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Income before income taxes and
cumulative effect of accounting
change .............................. 357.9 414.1 242.2 334.7 198.3 124.3 211.5 102.1
Cumulative effect of accounting
change, net ......................... -- -- -- (166.2) -- -- -- --
Net income(a) ......................... 253.2 289.9 190.8 72.1 146.5 98.3 158.1 96.6
Net income before cumulative
effect of accounting change
per common share
Basic ........................... $ 0.88 $ 1.01 $ 0.66 $ 0.83 $ 0.49 $ 0.34 $ 0.55 $ 0.33
Diluted ......................... 0.88 1.00 0.66 $ 0.82 0.49 0.33 0.54 0.33
Net income per common share
Basic ........................... $ 0.88 $ 1.01 $ 0.66 $ 0.25 $ 0.49 $ 0.34 $ 0.55 $ 0.33
Diluted ......................... 0.88 1.00 0.66 0.25 0.49 0.33 0.54 0.33
Market price per common share
High ............................ $ 30.62 $ 33.25 $ 35.03 $ 37.69 $ 42.30 $ 40.67 $ 35.25 $ 32.30
Low ............................. 25.40 26.40 29.80 33.25 35.20 32.85 26.55 25.84
Close ........................... 27.78 30.73 33.80 37.50 38.19 35.20 27.80 27.90
- ----------
(a) Prior year balances have been restated to reflect the reclassification of
JHSS expense reimbursement from other operating costs and expenses to
investment management revenues, commission and other fees.
Reclassification was $6.5 million for the three months ended March 31,
2002, $3.4 million for the three months ended June 30, 2002, $4.5 million
for the three months ended September 30, 2002 and $8.6 million for the
three months ended December 31, 2002.
202
JOHN HANCOCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and
Financial Disclosure
None.
Item 9A. Controls and Procedures
An evaluation was carried out under the supervision and with the
participation of the Company's management, including its Chief Executive Officer
and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended). Based on that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer concluded that the disclosure controls and procedures were
effective as of the end of the period covered by this report.
No change in the Company's internal control over financial reporting (as
defined in Rule 13a-15(f) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended)
occurred during the period covered by this report that has materially affected,
or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company's internal control
over financial reporting.
203
JOHN HANCOCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
PART III
Item 10. Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant.
The names of the directors and executive officers of John Hancock
Financial Services, Inc. and their respective ages (as of February 29, 2004) and
positions:
Age Position
David F. D'Alessandro 53 Chairman, President, Chief Executive
Officer and Director
John M. Connors, Jr. 61 Director
Robert J. Davis 47 Director
Richard B. DeWolfe 59 Director
Robert E. Fast 68 Director
Thomas P. Glynn 57 Director
Michael C. Hawley 66 Director
Edward H. Linde 62 Director
Judith A. McHale 57 Director
R. Robert Popeo 65 Director
Richard F. Syron 60 Director
Robert J. Tarr, Jr. 60 Director
Michael A. Bell 48 Senior Executive Vice President
James M. Benson 57 Senior Executive Vice President
Wayne A. Budd 62 Executive Vice President, General
Counsel and Director
Derek Chilvers 64 Executive Vice President
John M. DeCiccio 55 Executive Vice President and Chief
Investment Officer
Maureen R. Ford Goldfarb 48 Executive Vice President
Deborah H. McAneny 44 Executive Vice President
Thomas E. Moloney 60 Senior Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
Robert F. Walters 54 Executive Vice President and Chief
Information Officer
David F. D'Alessandro has been the Chairman of John Hancock Financial
Services, Inc. and John Hancock Life Insurance Company since 2001, and the
President and Chief Executive Officer and a director of the Company since 2000.
He had been President and Chief Operations Officer of John Hancock Life
Insurance Company since 1998 and a John Hancock Life Insurance Company director
since 1990. From 1988 to 1997 he was Senior Executive Vice President of John
Hancock Life Insurance Company. He is Chairman of the Executive Committee of the
board of directors of John Hancock Financial Services, Inc., Chairman of John
Hancock Subsidiaries, LLC and a director of The Berkeley Financial Group, LLC.
John M. Connors, Jr. has been a director of the Company since 2000 and has
been a John Hancock Life Insurance Company director since 1991. Mr. Connors has
been the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Hill, Holliday, Connors,
Cosmopulos, Inc., a full-service advertising agency and wholly-owned subsidiary
of The Interpublic Group of Companies, Inc., since 1987. He is a director of
Geerlings & Wade, Inc., a direct marketer of premium wines. Mr. Connors is also
the Chairman of the board of directors of Partners HealthCare System, Inc.
Robert J. Davis has been a director of the Company and of John Hancock
Life Insurance Company since 2002. Mr. Davis is a Venture Partner of Highland
Capital Partners, a venture capital firm. He was the Chief Executive Officer of
Terra Lycos, a global media company, from 2000 to 2001. From 1995 to 2000, Mr.
Davis was the Chief Executive Officer of Lycos, Inc.
Richard B. DeWolfe has been a director of the Company and of John Hancock
Life Insurance Company since 2002. Mr. DeWolfe is Managing Partner of DeWolfe &
Company, an investment, management consulting and management services firm. From
1974 to 2002, Mr. DeWolfe was Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of The
DeWolfe Companies, a major real estate services, mortgage banking and insurance
organization.
204
JOHN HANCOCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
Robert E. Fast has been a director of the Company since 2000 and has been
a John Hancock Life Insurance Company director since 1989. Mr. Fast is Of
Counsel to the law firm of Hale and Dorr LLP, from which he retired as senior
partner in 2002 and at which he has been an attorney since 1962.
Thomas P. Glynn has been a director of the Company and of John Hancock
Life Insurance Company since 2001. Since 1996, Mr. Glynn has been Chief
Operating Officer of Partners HealthCare System, Inc., a health care system
including Massachusetts General Hospital and Brigham and Women's Hospital.
Michael C. Hawley has been a director of the Company since 2000 and has
been a John Hancock Life Insurance Company director since 1995. Mr. Hawley was
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of The Gillette Company from 1999 until his
retirement in 2000. Previously, he had been President, Chief Operating Officer
and a director of The Gillette Company from 1995 to 1999.
Edward H. Linde has been a director of the Company since 2000 and has been
a John Hancock Life Insurance Company director since 1999. Mr. Linde has been
President and Chief Executive Officer of Boston Properties, Inc., an owner and
developer of office properties, since it became publicly held in 1997.
Judith A. McHale has been a director of the Company since 2000 and has
been a John Hancock Life Insurance Company director since 1999. She has been
President and Chief Operating Officer of Discovery Communications, Inc., parent
company of cable television's Discovery Channel, since 1995. She is a director
of Pepco Holdings, Inc., an electric company, Host Marriott Corporation, an
owner of hotels, and Polo Ralph Lauren Corporation, a provider of clothing and
other lifestyle products.
R. Robert Popeo has been a director of the Company and of John Hancock
Life Insurance Company since 2000. Mr. Popeo is Chairman of the law firm of
Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C., where he has been an
attorney since 1968.
Richard F. Syron has been a director of the Company since 2000 and has
been a John Hancock Life Insurance Company director since 1995. Mr. Syron has
served as a Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Federal Home Mortgage
Corporation (Freddie Mac) since December 2003. Mr. Syron served as Executive
Chairman of Thermo Electron Corporation, a manufacturer of a broad range of
scientific instrumentation and other products, a full-time position he held from
November 2002 to December 2003. He served as Chairman of the Board of Thermo
Electron from January 2000 to November 2002. He served as Chief Executive
Officer from 1999 to November 2002. He also served as president of Thermo
Electron from 1999 to 2000. From 1994 until 1999, Mr. Syron was the Chairman and
Chief Executive Officer of the American Stock Exchange, Inc. He is a director of
the McKesson Corporation, a healthcare services and technology company.
Robert J. Tarr, Jr. has been a director of the Company since 2000 and has
been a John Hancock Life Insurance Company director since 1996. Mr. Tarr has
served as a special partner to Chartwell Investments LLC, a private equity firm,
since 2002. From 1999 to 2001, Mr. Tarr was Chairman, President and Chief
Executive Officer of HomeRuns.com, an Internet-based food retailer. He is a
director of Barney's New York, Inc., a retailer of men's and women's apparel and
accessories, and Wesco International, Inc., a distributor of electrical
products.
Michael A. Bell has been a Senior Executive Vice President of John Hancock
and John Hancock Life Insurance Company since 2001. He has been Chairman and
Chief Executive Officer of John Hancock Variable Life Insurance Company since
2002. From 1983 to 2001, Mr. Bell was a Managing Director of Monitor Company.
From 1997 to the present, he has been a Managing Director of Monitor Clipper
Partners, Inc. He is a director of John Hancock Subsidiaries, LLC.
James M. Benson was elected a Senior Executive Vice President of John
Hancock and John Hancock Life Insurance Company in late 2002. He is a director
of John Hancock Subsidiaries, LLC. From 1999 to 2002, he was the President of
Individual Business for MetLife, Inc. In 1997, he joined New England Financial,
and served as President and Chief Operating Officer. From 1998 to 2002, he
served as Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of New England
Financial and during 2002 also served as Chairman, President and Chief Executive
Officer of Gen America Financial Corporation. New England Financial and Gen
America Financial Corporation are affiliates of MetLife, Inc.
Wayne A. Budd has been the Executive Vice President and General Counsel of
John Hancock and of John Hancock Life Insurance Company since 2000. He has been
a director of John Hancock since 2000 and a John Hancock Life Insurance Company
director since 1998. He is a director of John Hancock Subsidiaries, LLC. From
1996 to 2000, Mr. Budd was Group President--New England for the Bell Atlantic
Corporation (now Verizon Communications, Inc.). He is a director of Premcor,
Inc., a petroleum refiner and supplier of petroleum products, and the McKesson
Corporation.
205
JOHN HANCOCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
Derek Chilvers has been an Executive Vice President of John Hancock and
John Hancock Life Insurance Company since 2001. He was Senior Vice President of
John Hancock Life Insurance Company from 1986 to 2001. He also has been Chairman
and Chief Executive Officer of John Hancock International Holdings, Inc. since
1999 and Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of John Hancock International,
Inc. since 2000. He has been a director of John Hancock Subsidiaries, LLC since
2001.
John M. DeCiccio has been the Executive Vice President and Chief
Investment Officer of John Hancock and of John Hancock Life Insurance Company
since 2000. From 1997 through 2000, he led the demutualization project for John
Hancock Mutual Life Insurance Company. From 1994 through 2000, he was Senior
Vice President, Investment and Pension Sector, of John Hancock Mutual Life
Insurance Company. He is a director of Hancock Natural Resource Group, John
Hancock Life Insurance Company, John Hancock Subsidiaries, LLC, Independence
Investment, LLC, and The Berkeley Financial Group, LLC.
Maureen R. Ford Goldfarb has been an Executive Vice President of John
Hancock and of John Hancock Life Insurance Company since 2001. She has also been
a director of John Hancock Subsidiaries, LLC since 2001. She has been Chairman
and Chief Executive Officer of The Berkeley Financial Services Group, LLC (the
John Hancock Funds' complex) since 2001. She was Vice Chairman and Chief
Executive Officer of John Hancock Funds, LLC from 1999 to 2001. From 1996 to
1999, she served as a senior vice president of Massachusetts Mutual Life
Insurance Company.
Deborah H. McAneny has been an Executive Vice President of John Hancock
and of John Hancock Life Insurance Company, since 2002. She was Senior Vice
President of John Hancock Financial Services, Inc. and John Hancock Life
Insurance Company from 2000 through 2002 and Vice President of John Hancock Life
Insurance Company from 1998 through 2000. She is a director and Chief Executive
Officer of the Hancock Natural Resource Group. Ms. McAneny has been a director
of John Hancock Subsidiaries, LLC since 2002.
Thomas E. Moloney has been a Senior Executive Vice President of John
Hancock since 2001. He has also been Chief Financial Officer of John Hancock
since 1999 and of John Hancock Life Insurance Company since 1992. He is the
Chairman and a director of John Hancock Management Company and John Hancock
Reassurance Co., Ltd. He is Chairman of John Hancock Signature Services. He has
been Chief Financial Officer of John Hancock Subsidiaries, LLC since 1992 and is
a director. He is a director of The Berkeley Financial Group, LLC, John Hancock
Realty Services Corp., The Maritime Life Assurance Company and John Hancock
Canadian Holdings Limited. He is Chairman and a director of The Children's
Museum.
Robert F. Walters has been the Executive Vice President and Chief
Information Officer of John Hancock and Executive Vice President of John Hancock
Life Insurance Company since 2001. He was Senior Vice President and Chief
Information Officer of John Hancock Life Insurance Company from 1995 to 2001. He
is a director of Essex Corporation and John Hancock Subsidiaries, LLC.
Audit Committee Financial Expert
The Board of Directors has determined that Robert J. Tarr, Jr. meets the
SEC criteria for an "audit committee financial expert" and that Mr. Tarr is
independent under the applicable listing standards of the New York Stock
Exchange.
Code of Ethics
The Company has a Code of Ethics for Senior Financial Officers, which
applies to the Company's chief executive officer, the chief financial officer
and controller, and which meets the SEC criteria for a "code of ethics." The
Code of Ethics is available on the Company's Investor Relations website
(www.jhancock.com/investor). Please note, however, that the information
contained on the website is not incorporated by reference in, or considered to
be a part of, this document.
Item 11. Executive Compensation
2004 Executive Compensation Summary
If the pending merger between the Company and Manulife Financial
Corporation is consummated in 2004 as currently anticipated, the Company will be
a wholly-owned subsidiary of Manulife and as such will not prepare and
distribute a proxy statement to public stockholders in connection with meetings
of stockholders. The Company therefore believes it is appropriate in this report
to provide stockholders with the executive officer compensation decisions of the
Compensation Committee for the 2004 calendar year to date, which were made in
February 2004 in the normal course of its compensation decisions. These
206
JOHN HANCOCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
decisions otherwise would not be required to be made available to stockholders
until the filing of the Company's proxy statement for its 2005 stockholders'
meeting, which, as described above, will not occur if the Manulife merger is
consummated as currently anticipated.
The table below sets forth the principal elements of the compensation paid
or possibly payable to the Company's Chief Executive Officer and the Company's
other most highly compensated executive officers for the current 2004 calendar
year to date. Amounts shown under the column entitled "Salary" represent the
aggregate amount of salary that would be paid to the executive if the executive
is employed by the Company for the entire year. Amounts shown under the column
entitled "Target Cash Bonus" represent the target cash award that would be paid
to the executive if the performance targets are achieved and the executive is
employed by the Company for the entire year. Actual amounts payable may be
higher or lower or denied entirely for performance or any other reason. Please
see "Incentive Compensation Plan for Certain Senior Executives" below.
The table below does not include an "All Other Compensation" column, as
these amounts cannot be determined at this time. As previously disclosed, with
the introduction of stock-based awards in 2001 for executive officers, the last
cycle under the Company's Long-Term Incentive Plan ("LTIP") commenced on January
1, 2000 and ended on December 31, 2002. Since that time the Company has not
made, and in 2004 will not make, awards under the LTIP.
2004 Executive Compensation Summary Table
Number of Shares
Number of Shares Comprising
Target Underlying Restricted Grant Date Value of
Name Salary Cash Bonus Stock Options(1) Stock Awards(2) Restricted Stock Awards(3)
- ---- ------ ---------- ---------------- --------------- --------------------------
D.F. D'Alessandro $1,000,000 $1,000,000 225,000 75,000 $3,145,500
T.E. Moloney $ 700,000 $ 490,000 131,250 43,750 $1,834,875
M.A. Bell $ 600,000 $ 420,000 112,500 37,500 $1,572,750
M.R. Ford Goldfarb $ 500,000 $ 350,000 56,250 18,750 $ 786,375
J.M. Benson $ 600,000 $ 420,000 75,000 25,000 $1,048,500
- ----------
(1) Shares of JHFS common stock subject to all such options becoming
exercisable at the rate of 50% on each of the first and second
anniversaries of the date of grant subject to continued employment with
the Company (unless employment earlier terminates due to death, disability
or retirement) at an exercise price of $41.94 per share. The vesting of
such options does not accelerate upon the contemplated merger with
Manulife but would accelerate upon any subsequent change of control.
(2) Such shares of common stock are subject to forfeiture in the event of
termination of employment (other than due to death, disability or
retirement) within five years from the date of grant. The vesting of such
shares does not accelerate upon the contemplated merger with Manulife but
forfeiture provisions would lapse upon any subsequent change of control.
(3) Based on the closing price of the common stock of $41.94 on February 9,
2004, the grant date.
Summary Compensation Table
The following table describes the compensation paid to the Company's Chief
Executive Officer and the Company's four other most highly compensated executive
officers in 2003 for services rendered as executive officers of the Company
during the fiscal years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001 (the "Named
Executive Officers").
207
JOHN HANCOCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
Long-Term Compensation
----------------------------------------
Annual Compensation Awards Payouts
---------------------- --------------------------- -----------
Number of
Restricted Shares All Other
Stock Underlying LTIP Compensation
Name and Position Year Salary Bonus (1) Awards (2)(3) Options (3) Payouts (4) (5)
----------------- ---- ------ --------- ------------- ----------- ----------- ------------
D.F. D'Alessandro .... 2003 $1,000,000 $2,840,000 $13,012,085 -- -- $ 13,118
Chairman, President 2002 1,000,000 1,100,000 11,695,101 750,000 $7,865,143 84,412
and Chief Executive 2001 1,000,000 1,600,000 1,852,549 1,300,000 3,575,011 221,366
Officer
T.E. Moloney ......... 2003 700,000 1,641,000 5,163,647 -- -- 13,287
Senior Executive Vice 2002 607,693 539,000 4,586,102 250,000 1,969,476 62,108
President and Chief 2001 516,346 672,000 900,038 450,000 1,131,430 95,897
Financial Officer
M.A. Bell ............ 2003 600,000 1,192,801 4,349,272 -- -- 13,118
Senior Executive Vice 2002 600,000 462,000 4,396,217 250,000 755,211(6) 72,126
President 2001 115,385 1,422,000(7) 600,284 500,000 272,009(6) 76,981
M.R. Ford Goldfarb ... 2003 500,000 994,001 1,172,441 112,500 -- 12,698
Executive Vice 2002 500,000 385,000 194,208 275,000 410,982 12,753
President 2001 500,000 560,000 195,924 290,855 992,250 63,984
J.M. Benson (8) ...... 2003 600,000 2,192,801(9) -- -- -- 11,852
Senior Executive Vice 2002 -- -- -- 300,000 -- --
President
(1) The amounts in this column report annual Incentive Compensation Plan
awards paid in 2004, 2003 and 2002 for the prior performance years of
2003, 2002 and 2001 and, as noted below, certain sign-on bonuses.
(2) The amounts in this column report the aggregate dollar value of restricted
stock awards calculated by multiplying the closing market price of the
common stock on the date of each respective grant by the number of shares
granted.
In 2003, the following number of shares were granted to the Named
Executive Officers indicated subject to forfeiture prior to a change of
control of the Company in the event of termination of employment (other
than due to death, disability or retirement) within five years from the
date of grant: Mr. D'Alessandro: 450,000 shares; Mr. Moloney: 175,000
shares; Mr. Bell: 150,000 shares; and Ms. Ford Goldfarb: 37,500 shares.
Subsequent to such grants, in 2003 the Compensation Committee removed
forfeiture restrictions as to the following number of such shares held by
the indicated executives: Mr. D'Alessandro: 144,837 shares; and Mr.
Moloney: 81,197 shares, all in connection with the repayment of loans
under the Company's Stock Ownership Loan Program. Also, in 2003, the
following number of shares were granted to the Named Executive Officers
indicated as matching restricted stock awards under the 1999 Long-Term
Stock Incentive Plan in accordance with the Long-Term Incentive Plan or
the annual Incentive Compensation Plan, subject to forfeiture prior to a
change of control of the Company if within three years the executive
terminates employment (other than due to death, disability or retirement)
or sells any of the purchased shares with respect to which the matching
restricted stock award was made (provided that such restrictions lapse as
to one-third of the shares subject to each grant on each of the three
deemed anniversary dates of the grant): Mr. D'Alessandro: 4,994 shares;
Mr. Moloney: 5,695 shares; Mr. Bell: 2,097 shares; and Ms. Ford Goldfarb:
3,614 shares.
In 2002, the following number of shares were granted to the Named
Executive Officers indicated subject to forfeiture prior to a change of
control of the Company in the event of termination of employment (other
than due to death, disability or retirement) within five years from the
date of grant: Mr. D'Alessandro: 250,000 shares; Mr. Moloney: 100,000
shares; and Mr. Bell: 100,000 shares; and the following number of shares
were granted to the Named Executive Officers indicated as matching
restricted stock awards under the 1999 Long-Term Stock Incentive Plan in
accordance with the Long-Term Incentive Plan or the annual Incentive
Compensation Plan, subject to forfeiture prior to a change of control of
the Company if within three years the executive terminates employment
(other than due to death, disability or retirement) or sells any of the
purchased shares with respect to which the matching restricted stock award
was made (provided that such restrictions lapse as to one-third of the
shares subject to each grant on each of the three deemed anniversary dates
of the grant): Mr. D'Alessandro: 33,850 shares; Mr. Moloney: 11,137
shares; Mr. Bell: 6,174 shares; and Ms. Ford Goldfarb: 5,076 shares.
208
JOHN HANCOCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
In 2001, the following number of shares were granted to the Named
Executive Officers indicated subject to forfeiture prior to a change of
control of the Company in the event of termination of employment (other
than due to death, disability or retirement) within five years from the
date of grant: Mr. D'Alessandro: 28,000 shares; Mr. Moloney: 14,000
shares; and Mr. Bell: 16,749 shares; and the following number of shares
were granted to the Named Executive Officers indicated as matching
restricted stock awards under the 1999 Long-Term Stock Incentive Plan in
accordance with the Long-Term Incentive Plan or the annual Incentive
Compensation Plan, subject to forfeiture prior to a change of control of
the Company if within three years the executive terminates employment
(other than due to death, disability or retirement) or sells any of the
purchased shares with respect to which the matching restricted stock award
was made (provided that such restrictions lapse as to one-third of the
shares subject to each grant on each of the three deemed anniversary dates
of the grant): Mr. D'Alessandro: 24,255 shares; Mr. Moloney: 11,393
shares; Ms. Ford Goldfarb: 5,485 shares.
The aggregate number of restricted shares held by the Named Executive
Officers and the respective aggregate values thereof as of December 31,
2003, based on the closing market price on such date of the common stock
of $37.50 per share, were as follows: Mr. D'Alessandro: 628,366 shares
with a value of $23,563,725; Mr. Moloney: 228,370 shares with a value of
$8,563,875; Mr. Bell: 277,014 shares with a value of $10,388,025; and Ms.
Ford Goldfarb: 46,840 shares with a value of $1,756,500. Dividends paid on
restricted shares of common stock are reinvested in additional restricted
shares that are subject to the same terms of forfeiture as the restricted
shares on which the dividends are paid.
(3) All outstanding stock compensation grants made to employees prior to
September 28, 2003, vest upon the change of control that would occur upon
the closing of the contemplated merger with Manulife. Pursuant to the
definitive merger agreement with Manulife, no stock compensation grants
made to employees under the Incentive Plans subsequent to September 28,
2003 vest on that contemplated change in control.
(4) The amounts in this column report Long-Term Incentive Plan payouts earned
for each of the three-year performance cycles ended December 31, 2002 and
2001; and for Mr. D'Alessandro, for 2002, $3,506,243 paid as a retention
award in 2003 pursuant to a program established in 1998 under which Mr.
D'Alessandro was required to remain in the Company's employ for five years
in order to receive an award of $2,000,000, adjusted for certain operating
results of the Company during the five year period.
(5) The amounts shown in this column for 2003 include the value of premiums
paid by the company on behalf of the Named Executive Officers for term
life insurance under the Company's Executive Life Insurance Program for
Senior Officers. The amounts in this column also include Company match
contributions under "401(k)" plans qualified under Section 401(a) of the
Internal Revenue Code. Total Company match contributions for 2003 were
$12,000, in all cases shown except Mr. Benson's match contribution was
$11,077.
(6) Upon becoming an executive officer, Mr. Bell participated (on an
approximately pro rata basis as to the number of equity rights granted) in
the three-year performance cycles ended December 31, 2002 and 2001 based
on his starting salary and retroactive to January 1, 1999.
(7) Includes a $750,000 sign-on bonus paid to Mr. Bell upon his becoming an
executive officer in October 2001. Mr. Bell also participated in the
Incentive Compensation Plan upon becoming an executive officer based on
his starting salary and retroactive to January 1, 2001.
(8) Mr. Benson became a Senior Executive Vice President of the Company on
December 30, 2002.
(9) Includes a $1,000,000 sign-on bonus paid to Mr. Benson.
209
JOHN HANCOCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
Option Grants in Last Fiscal Year
The following table provides information as to options granted to the
Named Executive Officers during 2003.
Individual Grants
---------------------------------------------------- Potential Realizable Value at Assumed Annual Rates of
Number of Appreciation for Option Term (2)
Shares Percent of Total --------------------------------------------------------
Underlying Options Granted 5% 10%
Options to Employees in Exercise Expiration --------------------------- -------------------------
Name Granted (1) Fiscal Year Price ($) Date Stock Price ($) Gains ($) Stock Price ($) Gains ($)
- ---- ----------- ---------------- --------- ---------- --------------- --------- --------------- ---------
M.R. Ford Goldfarb 112,500 11.02% $28.65 01/03/08 $36.57 $891,000 $46.14 $1,967,625
- ----------
(1) Shares subject to all such options become exercisable at the rate of 50%
on each of the first and second anniversaries of the date of grant subject
to continued employment with the Company (unless employment earlier
terminates due to death, disability or retirement) or immediately upon a
change of control of the Company. The vesting of such options accelerates
in full upon the closing of the contemplated merger with Manulife.
(2) The Company selected potential realizable values at assumed 5% and 10%
rates as provided in rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission. The
values shown, therefore, are not intended as a forecast of the common
stock price.
Fiscal Year-End Option Values
The following table provides information as to options held by the Named
Executive Officers at December 31, 2003. None of the Named Executive Officers
exercised any options in 2003.
Value of Unexercised
Number of Shares Underlying In-the-Money Options at
Unexercised Options at Fiscal Year-End Fiscal Year-End (1)
-------------------------------------- -------------------------------
Name Exercisable Unexercisable Exercisable Unexercisable
- ---- ----------- ------------- ----------- -------------
D.F. D'Alessandro ....... 1,675,000 375,000 $ 2,561,000 $ 0
T.E. Moloney ............ 575,000 125,000 886,500 0
M.A. Bell ............... 625,000 125,000 837,500 0
M.R. Ford Goldfarb ...... 515,101 250,000 2,339,236 995,625
J.M. Benson ............. 150,000 150,000 1,438,500 1,438,500
- ----------
(1) Option values are based upon the difference between the exercise price of
options held and the December 31, 2003 closing price for the common stock
of $37.50 per share.
Incentive Compensation Plan for Certain Senior Executives
Under the Incentive Compensation Plan for Certain Senior Executives (the
"ICP"), cash awards are payable to eligible employees, including the Company
executive officers, upon the achievement of corporate performance objectives
established by the Compensation Committee of the Board. Target cash awards are
stated as a percentage of the base salary payable to each eligible employee,
with the range of targets for executive officers above the level of senior vice
president being from 60% to 100% of the officer's base salary. Actual amounts
payable may be higher or lower than the target or denied entirely for
performance or any other reason. Payments, if any, under the ICP are made during
the first quarter of the fiscal year immediately following the performance year.
In order to assist senior officers in meeting common stock ownership
guidelines established by the Compensation Committee, senior officers were
permitted from 2000 to 2003 (including executive officers commencing in 2001) to
apply a portion of their cash award (either 25% or 50%) to purchase common stock
either on the open market or from the Company at the fair market value as
determined by the Compensation Committee. The number of shares purchased in this
manner were matched by a restricted stock award of a number of shares equal to
50% of the shares purchased in 2000 and 2001 and 25% of the shares purchased in
2002 and 2003 (for executive officers, 50% in 2001 and 2002 and 25% in 2003). In
addition, executive officers were permitted to apply shares of common stock that
they previously purchased in the open market and still held against the amount
of common stock required to be purchased in order to receive the matching
shares. Matching stock grants are subject to forfeiture, prior to a change of
control of the Company if, within three years the individual's employment with
the Company or an affiliate is terminated (other than by retirement, death or
disability) or if the individual sells any of the purchased shares, provided
that such restrictions lapse as to one-third of the shares subject to each grant
on each of the three deemed anniversary
210
JOHN HANCOCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
dates of the grant. All matches of restricted shares of common stock were made
under the Company's 1999 Long-Term Stock Incentive Plan. Provisions for the
purchase of stock and the match are not in effect for 2004 or subsequent years.
If a senior officer elected to defer a portion of an ICP award, as
provided in the Company's Deferred Compensation Plan for Executives, the 25% or
50% election to purchase common stock referred to above related to the total
award, including any amount deferred. Any deferred amount subject to the 25% or
50% election was applied to an investment in deferred stock units, or DSUs,
rather than being used to purchase common stock. The recipients of the DSUs
received a matching grant of restricted DSUs pursuant to the same terms and
conditions that would have applied to the purchase of common stock under the
ICP. Such matching grant of DSUs is subject to forfeiture on the same bases that
would have been applicable to the matching grant of common stock under the ICP.
The characteristics of DSUs are described in the section below entitled
"Compensation of Directors."
With respect to awards paid in 2003, executive officers of the Company
received 75% of ICP awards paid in cash (prior to any application of the award
to the purchase of common stock as described above) and were permitted to elect
to receive the balance of the award as a grant of a non-qualified stock option
under the 1999 Long-Term Stock Incentive Plan for a number of shares such that
the option has a value equal to 28.75% of the ICP award as determined by the
Compensation Committee using appropriate methodologies. Other terms and
conditions of the options are determined by the Compensation Committee. If this
election were made, the number of matching restricted common stock shares or
matching restricted deferred stock units would have been the same as if the
entire ICP award had been made in the form of cash.
Long-Term Incentive Plan
The Long-Term Incentive Plan for Senior Executives (the "LTIP") operated
during successive three-year periods, or performance cycles, with the last
performance cycle under the LTIP having ended December 31, 2002. No equity
rights were granted to any of the Named Executive Officers in 2003 or 2002. At
the beginning of each performance cycle, each participant was awarded a number
of "equity rights" determined by dividing his or her target award by 100. The
target awards were based on a percentage of salary with the range of target
awards for executive officers having been set between 70% to approximately 350%.
If corporate performance objectives established by the Compensation Committee
were achieved during the performance cycle, each of the equity rights was worth
$100, or the value may have been adjusted up (to a maximum of $300 per equity
right) or down depending on whether the goals were exceeded or not met. In 2000,
the LTIP was amended to provide that effective as of January 1, 2001, all awards
under the plan, including under prior performance cycles, would vest in full,
rather than in three annual installments, at the end of each performance cycle.
Cash payments equal to the value of the equity rights were paid during the first
quarter of the year immediately following the end of each performance cycle.
Under the LTIP, participants were permitted to use a portion of their cash
awards (50% for executive officers) to purchase common stock either in the open
market or from the Company at the fair market value as determined by the
Compensation Committee. Upon such purchase, the Company granted the participants
a partial matching stock grant subject to the same restrictions that apply to
the matching shares of common stock granted under the ICP as described in the
preceding section entitled "Incentive Compensation Plan for Certain Senior
Executives." For executive officers, the match equaled 50% of the shares
purchased through 2002 and 25% of the shares purchased in 2003. Executive
officers were permitted to apply any common stock that they previously purchased
in the open market and still held against the amount of common stock required to
be purchased in order to receive matching shares. Under the LTIP, participants
were permitted to elect to defer a portion of their cash awards. A portion of
the amount deferred is allocated as DSUs (entitling the executive to restricted
DSUs) on the same terms and conditions as apply to deferred cash awards under
the ICP as described in the preceding section.
1999 Long-Term Stock Incentive Plan
Under the Company's 1999 Long-Term Stock Incentive Plan, (as amended, the
"Long-Term Stock Incentive Plan") a committee of not less than two non-employee
members of the Board responsible for administering the Long-Term Stock Incentive
Plan (the "Committee"), which is currently the Compensation Committee, may from
time to time grant eligible employees or non-employee directors of the Company
and its subsidiaries qualified or nonqualified stock options, and may grant
eligible agents and other producers nonqualified stock options, to purchase
shares of common stock having an exercise price at least equal to the fair
market value of a share of common stock on the effective date of the grant of
such stock option. The Committee may also award eligible participants the right
to receive shares, a cash equivalent payment, or a combination of both which may
be subject to forfeitability contingencies based on continued employment with
the Company or on meeting performance criteria or both (the "Stock Awards").
The maximum number of shares of common stock that may be issued under the
Long-Term Stock Incentive Plan is 40,741,403 shares, provided that any shares of
common stock underlying awards which are forfeited, canceled, reacquired by us,
satisfied without the issuance of common stock or otherwise terminated (other
than by exercise) shall be added back to the shares of common stock available
for issuance under the Long-Term Stock Incentive Plan. The maximum number of
shares that may be
211
JOHN HANCOCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
granted as Stock Awards is 8,148,281 shares and the maximum number of shares
available for use as incentive stock options is 32,593,122 shares. Additionally,
the maximum number of shares that may be awarded to any participant is 8,148,281
shares. If there is a stock split, stock dividend, recapitalization or other
relevant change affecting the outstanding shares of common stock, appropriate
adjustments as determined by the Committee will be made in the number and kind
of shares available for award under the Long-Term Stock Incentive Plan in the
future and the number and kind of shares as to which outstanding shares shall be
exercisable. The plan provides that the Committee may further amend the
Long-Term Stock Incentive Plan, except that no amendment without the approval of
our stockholders shall be made which would increase the number of shares
available for issuance under the Long-Term Stock Incentive Plan or cause the
Long-Term Stock Incentive Plan not to comply with Rule 16b-3 of the Exchange Act
or Section 162(m) of the Code. No awards may be made under the Long-Term Stock
Incentive Plan after ten years from the date of approval or earlier termination
of the Long-Term Stock Incentive Plan by the board. In the event of a change of
control, the Committee may provide for the acceleration of any time period
relating to the exercise or realization of the award, provide for the purchase
of the award upon the participant's request for an amount of cash or other
property that could have been received upon the exercise or realization of the
award had the award been currently exercisable or payable, adjust the terms of
the award, cause the award to be assumed, or new rights substituted therefore,
by another entity, or make such other provisions as the Committee may consider
to be equitable and in our best interests. Stock awards granted by the Committee
in early 2004 do not accelerate upon the contemplated merger with Manulife
Financial.
Each stock option granted under the Long-Term Stock Incentive Plan is
evidenced by a written agreement or other documentation that specifies the
number of shares of common stock subject to the stock option and the other terms
and conditions of the stock option, consistent with the requirements of the
Long-Term Stock Incentive Plan. The exercise price per share must equal at least
the fair market value of a share of common stock on the date of grant of the
stock option; provided that the exercise price of an incentive stock option
granted to a participant who at the time of grant owns (or is deemed to own) at
least 10% of the total combined voting power of all classes of the Company's
(including its affiliates) stock must equal at least 110% of the fair market
value of a share of common stock on the date of grant. For any date, fair market
value means the mean of the reported high and low sale prices of the shares of
common stock on the principal exchange on which the common stock is traded on
such date, or if no common stock is traded on such date, on the most recent date
on which common stock was traded, as reflected on such principal exchange.
Additionally, an incentive stock option must expire within 10 years from its
date of grant; provided that an incentive stock option granted to a participant
who at the time of grant owns (or is deemed to own) at least 10% of the total
combined voting power of all classes of the Company's (including its affiliates)
stock must expire within five years from its date of grant. The Committee
specifies when stock options granted under the Long-Term Stock Incentive Plan
will become exercisable and other restrictions.
Employment Arrangements
Executive Employment Agreements. The Company has jointly with John Hancock
Life Insurance Company entered into agreements with the Named Executive Officers
that provide for, among other things, a defined period of employment,
post-termination benefits, and indemnification for the executives, and
non-competition, non-solicitation and confidentiality agreements by the
executives. The prescribed period of employment, subject to annual one year
extensions, is four years for Mr. D'Alessandro and three years for each of the
other Named Executive Officers with such agreements. The agreements further
provide for a statement of title, duties and reporting line of authority, the
executive's base salary, participation in existing compensation programs and
severance benefits as further described below. Post-termination benefits vary
depending upon the classification of the termination, which include death,
retirement, disability, with or without cause (as defined), voluntary
termination, or for good reason (as defined). If a termination event occurs
after a change of control, compensation and benefits shall be determined
exclusively in accordance with the employment continuation agreements described
in the section below entitled "Employment Continuation Agreements".
Upon a termination due to the death, retirement or disability of an
executive, the executive will be entitled to receive: (i) the executive's salary
through the end of the month during which the death, retirement or disability
occurs; (ii) a pro-rata amount of the executive's annual cash incentive award;
(iii) equity rights and retirement benefits in accordance with existing
arrangements; and (iv) in the case of a disability, disability benefits in
accordance with existing long-term disability plans. In the event that an
executive's termination is for cause or a voluntary termination by the
executive, the executive will be entitled to the executive's base salary and
accrued vacation through the termination date, and equity rights and retirement
benefits in accordance with existing plans. A termination of the executive by
the Company without cause or by the executive for good reason will entitle the
executive, for the balance of the employment term, to receive: (i) the
executive's base salary through the end of the month during which the
termination date occurs; (ii) a pro-rata amount of the executive's annual cash
incentive award; (iii) a "Termination Payment Amount" (as further described
below); (iv) medical and dental benefits for the executive and the executive's
family until the executive is eligible to receive comparable benefits; (v) such
retirement benefits as are set forth in the executive's employment continuation
agreement; and (vi) equity rights in accordance with existing plans. The
executive may receive such benefits in a lump sum settlement. "Good reason"
includes, among other things, a reduction in the executive's base salary, a
failure of the Company to obtain in writing the assumption of the executive's
employment continuation agreement prior to a change of control,
212
JOHN HANCOCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
and in the case of Mr. D'Alessandro, a material diminution in duties. A
"Termination Payment Amount" for an executive will equal the sum of: (i) the
executive's base salary multiplied by the number of years remaining in the term
of the agreement, plus a pro-rata amount of the executive's base salary for the
remainder of the year during which the termination date occurs; (ii) the average
of the annual incentive bonus award for the three years preceding the
termination date or such time as the executive had been employed by the Company
if less than three years multiplied by the number of full years remaining in the
agreement; and (iii) an amount equal to the long-term incentive award granted to
the executive in the calendar year 2000 (or equivalent) multiplied by the number
of full years remaining in the agreement, reduced by the grant value of the
five-year restricted stock that has or would have vested in accordance with the
original vesting schedule.
Employment Continuation Agreements. The Company has entered into
agreements with each of the Named Executive Officers that provide for each
executive's continued employment with the Company or, if applicable, John
Hancock Life Insurance Company, for a period of three years following the
occurrence of a change of control (as defined) of the Company. Under these
agreements, each eligible executive's terms and conditions of employment,
including rate of base salary, annual bonus opportunity, participation in
long-term incentive compensation programs and benefit plans and title, position,
duties and responsibilities, are not to be modified in a manner adverse to the
executive following the change of control. If an eligible executive's employment
is terminated by the Company within three years of a change of control without
cause (as defined), or is terminated by the executive for good reason (as
defined), the Company will provide the executive with certain benefits, among
other things, severance in an amount equal to three times the sum of the
executive's annual base salary, target annual bonus amount and long-term
incentive award granted to the executive with respect to the performance period
commencing in 2000 (with Mr. Bell and Mr. Benson each being entitled to a
long-term incentive award equivalent to two times annual base salary). For
Messrs. D'Alessandro, Moloney, Bell and Budd, good reason includes any
termination by the executive during brief specified periods for one year
following a change of control as described below. The severance amounts will
also be payable if an executive's employment is terminated without cause (as
defined) after the occurrence of certain specified events that are a prelude to
a change of control, such as the commencement of a tender offer or a proxy
contest or the signing of a merger agreement, and a change of control occurs
within two years thereafter.
The agreements also provide that an executive who receives severance
benefits will also receive various benefits and payments otherwise earned by or
owing to the executive for prior service. Such an executive will receive a
pro-rated target bonus for the then current year, pro-rated long-term incentive
amounts in respect of performance periods then in effect, continued
participation in health, welfare and life benefit plans for up to three years
from the termination date, other than for Mr. Benson, and premium payments on
split-dollar policies from the date of termination. Except as noted below for
Messrs. D'Alessandro, Budd, Bell and Benson, each such executive's retirement
benefits will be calculated based on the service the executive would have
attained or completed had the executive continued in the employ of the Company
until the earlier of (1) the date the executive attains age 65 or (2) the third
anniversary of termination. In the event that Mr. D'Alessandro becomes entitled
to receive severance benefits under the agreement or if his employment
terminates more than three years after a change of control, but under
circumstances under which he would have been entitled to severance were the
agreement then still in effect, his retirement benefits will be based on his
highest compensation during a specified thirty-six month period and he will be
deemed to have worked until the earliest age at which he could retire and
immediately commence receipt of his retirement benefits without actuarial
reduction for early commencement. He will also be entitled to receive the
benefits customarily provided by John Hancock to its retired Chief Executive
Officers. If Mr. Budd's employment terminates after a change of control for any
reason other than for cause or due to his death, he will be given fifteen years
service credit for purposes of his retiree medical and retiree life insurance
benefits and, for purposes of the cash balance formula of the Company's pension
plan, service credit of fifteen years less the number of years he is employed by
the Company. Mr. Budd has the option to elect to receive in lieu of the amounts
thus determined under the cash balance formula of the pension plan, the pension
benefits payable for a grandfathered participant who qualifies for actuarially
unreduced benefits under the pension plan. Prior to the amendment to Mr. Bell's
agreement in connection with the proposed merger between the Company and
Manulife (discussed below), Mr. Bell's agreement provided that if his employment
terminated after a change of control for any reason, he would receive certain
retiree medical benefits and monthly payments equal to $33,333 for life (half
for the life of his surviving spouse), reduced by amounts expected to be paid
out under his cash balance pension account. In connection with the proposed
merger between the Company and Manulife, Mr. Bell agreed to forego these
additional benefits to which he otherwise would have been entitled. Under Mr.
Benson's agreement, as amended, he would be entitled to receive a $200,000
annual annuity benefit without regard to his age on the date of termination for
the remainder of his lifetime, with this benefit guaranteed for a twenty-year
period. The Company will also make additional payments to any eligible executive
who incurs any excise taxes in respect of the benefits and other payments
provided under the agreement or otherwise on account of the change of control
(the "Covered Payments"). The additional payments will be in an amount such
that, after taking into account such excise taxes and any Federal, state and
local taxes, and additional excise taxes applicable to such additional payments,
the executive is able to retain, before deduction of any Federal, state or local
tax withheld on such Covered Payments, the amount of the Covered Payments.
213
JOHN HANCOCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
In connection with entering into the merger agreement relating to the
proposed merger between the Company and Manulife, the employment continuation
agreements of Messrs. D'Alessandro, Moloney, Budd, Bell and Benson were each
amended. These amendments (i) define the positions to be held by Messrs.
D'Alessandro, Moloney, Budd and Benson with Manulife, John Hancock and John
Hancock Life Insurance Company following the merger; (ii) further define certain
events that would constitute "good reason" for each of the executives to
terminate his employment; (iii) delay (until the first anniversary of the
merger) the commencement of a 180-day period during which Messrs. D'Alessandro,
Moloney, Bell and Budd may terminate their respective employment for any reason
and have it deemed to be a good reason termination; (iv) eliminate the
additional pension benefits to which Mr. Bell would otherwise have been entitled
under his agreement; and (v) provide that Mr. Benson's annual annuity benefit is
guaranteed for a 20-year period. These amendments automatically terminate if the
merger agreement is terminated prior to the completion of the merger.
Pension Plan Table
The Company provides retirement benefits to its employees under a defined
benefit pension plan intended to qualify for favorable tax benefits under
Section 401(a) of the Internal Revenue Code. The Company also maintains
non-qualified pension plans to provide retirement benefits that are attributable
to the limitations on compensation or benefits imposed on its qualified pension
plan by the Internal Revenue Code or the Federal Employee Retirement Income
Security Act ("ERISA"). The amounts set forth in the table below represent the
benefits that the Named Executive Officers could receive from the qualified and
non-qualified pension plans based on years of plan participation and final
average pay.
Years of Plan Participation
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Final Average
Compensation 15 20 25 30 35 40 45
------------ -- -- -- -- -- -- --
$ 500,000 $ 132,431 $ 176,574 $ 220,718 $ 264,862 $ 278,105 $ 291,348 $ 304,591
750,000 199,931 266,574 333,218 399,862 419,855 439,848 459,841
1,000,000 267,431 356,574 445,718 534,862 561,605 588,348 615,091
1,250,000 334,931 446,574 558,218 669,862 703,355 736,848 770,341
1,500,000 402,431 536,574 670,718 804,862 845,105 885,348 925,591
1,750,000 469,931 626,574 783,218 939,862 986,855 1,033,848 1,080,841
2,000,000 537,431 716,574 895,718 1,074,862 1,128,605 1,182,348 1,236,091
2,250,000 604,931 806,574 1,008,218 1,209,862 1,270,355 1,330,848 1,391,341
2,500,000 672,431 896,574 1,120,718 1,344,862 1,412,105 1,479,348 1,546,591
2,750,000 739,931 986,574 1,233,218 1,479,862 1,553,855 1,627,848 1,701,841
3,000,000 807,431 1,076,574 1,345,718 1,614,862 1,695,605 1,776,348 1,857,091
3,250,000 874,931 1,166,574 1,458,218 1,749,862 1,837,355 1,924,848 2,012,341
3,500,000 942,431 1,256,574 1,570,718 1,884,862 1,979,105 2,073,348 2,167,591
3,750,000 1,009,931 1,346,574 1,683,218 2,019,862 2,120,855 2,221,848 2,322,841
4,000,000 1,077,431 1,436,574 1,795,718 2,154,862 2,262,605 2,370,348 2,478,091
4,250,000 1,144,931 1,526,574 1,908,218 2,289,862 2,404,355 2,518,848 2,633,341
4,500,000 1,212,431 1,616,574 2,020,718 2,424,862 2,546,105 2,667,348 2,788,591
4,750,000 1,279,931 1,706,574 2,133,218 2,559,862 2,687,855 2,815,848 2,943,841
The illustrated benefits are payable in the form of a single life annuity
beginning at the executive's normal retirement age (65). Actual payments from
the plan are available in other annuity forms or as a lump sum payment after
making required actuarial adjustments under the pension plan. Benefits payable
under the plan are not subject to offset for Social Security benefits. For
pension purposes, eligible compensation includes salary and ICP bonus as such
items are indicated for the Named Executive Officers in the Summary Compensation
Table. For this pension calculation, final average compensation (referenced in
the table above) is based on the higher of the executive's average compensation
paid in the 36 months immediately prior to retirement or termination, or the
executive's average compensation paid in the highest 3 consecutive calendar
years in the last 10 calendar years prior to retirement or termination.
214
JOHN HANCOCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
As of January 2002, the Company's pension plan converted from a final
average pay defined-benefit formula as reflected above to a cash balance format.
Under the cash balance plan, employees have an account balance, which is
credited with quarterly pay credits (equal to 4%, for amounts up to the social
security wage base, or 8%, for greater amounts, of eligible compensation) and
daily interest credits. The plan interest rate is reset annually based on the
yields on 10-year Treasury bonds. Benefits payable at normal retirement age (65)
are determined by the value of the employee's cash balance account at their
pension commencement date. Under provisions related to the conversion of the
pension plan to a cash balance format that were applicable to all participating
employees generally, Messrs. D'Alessandro and Moloney are eligible to receive
benefits under the plan's prior final average pay formula and retirement
provisions. These executives and other such "grandfathered" eligible employees
will receive the larger of the benefit generated by the cash balance formula or
by the prior final average pay defined benefit plan provisions at the time of
retirement or termination. Since the final average pay benefit is likely to be
higher at retirement than the benefit generated by their cash balance account,
the table above shows the estimated annual pension benefits that would be
payable to such a participant at normal retirement age, based on the prior final
average pay formula. The annual benefit under the cash balance formula payable
as a single life annuity beginning at age 65 for Messrs. Bell and Benson and Ms.
Ford Goldfarb based on service to the Company through December 31, 2003 is
$39,765, $4,553 and $75,183 respectively. The estimated annual benefits under
the cash balance formula payable as a single life annuity beginning at age 65
for Messrs. Bell and Benson and Ms. Ford Goldfarb based on service to the
Company from January 1, 2004 through age 65, assuming that these executives
continue in the Company's employ to age 65 based on current compensation is
$313,169, $116,421 and $292,219, respectively. In the case of Mr. Benson, in
addition to amounts to which he would be entitled under the plan's cash balance
format, he would also be entitled to an annual annuity benefit of $200,000 per
year if he retires on or after age 62.
As of February 29, 2004, the following executives had approximately the
number of years of credited service indicated: Mr. D'Alessandro, 19; Mr. Bell,
2; Ms. Ford Goldfarb, 4; Mr. Moloney, 38; and Mr. Benson, 1.
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation
All members of the Compensation Committee - Messrs. Syron and Hawley and
Ms. McHale - are independent, non-employee directors. No member of the
Compensation Committee or executive officer of the Company has a relationship
that would constitute an interlocking relationship with executive officers or
directors of another entity.
Ms. McHale is the Chief Operating Officer and President of Discovery
Communications, Inc. ("Discovery"). Discovery is the obligor on $50 million of a
series of 8.37% senior unsecured notes (part of a total issuance of notes in
2001 by Discovery of $700 million) held in the ordinary course of business by
John Hancock Life Insurance Company, for itself and for its affiliates and
managed accounts. As of February 29, 2004, the total amount outstanding under
such notes held by John Hancock Life Insurance Company was $43,669,815. The
largest amount outstanding under such notes from January 1, 2003 to February 29,
2004 was $46,872,788.
Since December 31, 2003, Mr. Syron has been the Chairman and Chief
Executive Officer of The Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (Freddie Mac).
From time to time, the Company and various of its affiliates, for themselves and
for managed accounts, buy and sell in the ordinary course of business equity and
debt securities of various companies including Freddie Mac. Such securities are
held for investment purposes.
Compensation of Directors
Retainer and Other Fees. The compensation for directors of the Company who
are not officers or employees of the Company currently consists of a $50,000
annual retainer fee (half of which is paid in shares of common stock as
described in the following paragraph) plus a $2,000 attendance fee for each
Board or committee meeting attended. Committee chairpersons who are not officers
or employees are also paid an additional $10,000 per year, other than the
chairperson of the Audit Committee who receives an additional fee of $20,000.
Members of the Audit Committee who are not the chairperson are also paid an
additional $5,000 annual retainer. In years prior to 2001, a deferral account
for each director was credited annually with an amount equal to one-half the
annual retainer fee that was adjusted annually based on results of John Hancock
Life Insurance Company for that year. In 2001 all account balances were invested
in deferred stock units established by the Company. Deferred stock units, or
DSUs, are obligations of the Company to pay deferred compensation in the future
with a return on the amount of compensation deferred equal to the return that
would occur if the deferred amount were used to purchase shares of common stock,
including the reinvestment of cash dividends when paid into shares of common
stock. DSUs are not convertible into another security of the Company and cannot
be settled in or surrendered for shares of stock. The balance in the DSU account
generally will be paid shortly following the end of the director's service on
the Board subject to certain options available to the director.
Non-Employee Directors' Long-Term Stock Incentive Plan. Under the
Company's Non-Employee Directors' Long-Term Stock Incentive Plan, prior to 2003
each of the non-employee directors of the Company received annual stock option
grants to
215
JOHN HANCOCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
purchase 5,000 shares of common stock on the date of each annual stockholders
meeting; provided that the Company granted each new non-employee director an
option to purchase 15,000 shares of common stock upon election to the Board and
such person was not eligible for an annual stock option grant during the same
calendar year. All such options are exercisable for five years at a price per
share equal to the fair market value of the common stock on the date of grant.
Commencing in 2003, each of the non-employee directors of the Company instead
receives an annual stock option or common stock award as determined by the
Board. For 2003, each non-employee director received restricted stock on the
date of the annual meeting of stockholders having a fair market value of $50,000
on the date of grant. Such shares were granted subject to forfeiture, prior to a
change of control of the Company if, within five years of the date of grant, the
director's service with the Company is terminated (other than by retirement,
death or disability). The non-employee directors also receive half of each
quarterly installment of the annual retainer amount established by the Board in
shares of common stock rather than cash, and are entitled to receive matching
grants of restricted shares of common stock (or restricted DSUs, if the director
has elected to defer cash compensation) if they use all or a portion of the cash
portion of their retainer for the purchase of common stock (or DSUs, if
applicable) either in the open market or from the Company at the fair market
value of the common stock as determined by the Compensation Committee. The
number of matching shares is a percentage of the shares purchased as determined
by the Board from time to time (50% for the first two quarters of 2003 and 25%
thereafter). Matching shares are granted subject to forfeiture, prior to a
change of control of the Company if, within three years of the date of grant the
director's service with the Company is terminated (other than by retirement,
death or disability) or if the director sells any of the purchased shares,
subject to any incremental lapse of such restrictions over the three-year period
that may in the future be provided for by the Board.
The Company also pays premiums for long-term care insurance provided to
certain of its non-employee directors and their families. In 2003, the amounts
of the premiums paid for directors receiving this benefit were as follows: Mr.
Davis: $762; Mr. DeWolfe: $2,415; Mr. Fast: $1,423; Mr. Glynn: $2,087; Mr.
Popeo: $1,688; Mr. Syron: $1,525; and Mr. Tarr: $1,773.
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and
Related Stockholder Matters.
The following table shows as of February 29, 2004 beneficial ownership of
shares of common stock by (i) each director, (ii) each executive officer named
in the Summary Compensation Table above, and (iii) all current directors and
executive officers as a group. Except as otherwise indicated below, each of the
persons named in the table has sole voting and investment power with respect to
the shares beneficially owned by such person as set forth opposite that person's
name. To the knowledge of the Company, no stockholder beneficially owned more
than 5% of the common stock as of February 29, 2004.
Shares Beneficially
Name Owned (1) Percentage
- ----- ------------------- ----------
David F. D'Alessandro .................................................. 2,909,712 (2) *
Wayne A. Budd .......................................................... 667,108 (3) *
John M. Connors, Jr .................................................... 287,978 (4) *
Robert J. Davis ........................................................ 17,944 (5) *
Richard B. DeWolfe ..................................................... 19,126 (6) *
Robert E. Fast, Esq .................................................... 23,682 (6) *
Thomas P. Glynn ........................................................ 25,956 (7) *
Michael C. Hawley ...................................................... 25,595 (6) *
Edward H. Linde ........................................................ 43,736 (6) *
Judith A. McHale ....................................................... 23,595 (6) *
R. Robert Popeo, Esq ................................................... 33,595 (6) *
Richard F. Syron ....................................................... 26,251 (8) *
Robert J. Tarr, Jr ..................................................... 33,626 (6) *
Michael A. Bell ........................................................ 1,087,897 (9) *
James M. Benson ........................................................ 175,121 (10) *
Maureen R. Ford Goldfarb ............................................... 848,547 (11) *
Thomas E. Moloney ...................................................... 1,064,259 (12) *
All current directors and executive officers as a group (21 persons) ... 9,853,895 (13) 3.3%
* Represents less than 1% of the outstanding shares of common stock.
(1) Includes, where applicable, shares held in Company "401(k)" plans
qualified under Section 401(a) of the Internal Revenue Code.
216
JOHN HANCOCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
(2) Mr. D'Alessandro disclaims beneficial ownership of 3,938 such shares held
in trust. Includes 2,050,000 shares subject to options exercisable within
60 days of February 29, 2004 and 703,366 shares of restricted stock as to
which Mr. D'Alessandro currently has no dispositive power.
(3) Mr. Budd disclaims beneficial ownership of 425 such shares held in trust.
Includes 34 shares owned by Mr. Budd's spouse, 425,000 shares subject to
options exercisable within 60 days of February 29, 2004 and 183,607 shares
of restricted stock as to which Mr. Budd currently has no dispositive
power.
(4) Mr. Connors disclaims beneficial ownership of 989 such shares held in
trust. Includes 8,252 shares owned by Mr. Connors' spouse, 20,000 shares
subject to options exercisable within 60 days of February 29, 2004 and
1,825 shares of restricted stock as to which Mr. Connors currently has no
dispositive power.
(5) Includes 15,000 shares subject to options exercisable within 60 days of
February 29, 2004 and 1,825 shares of restricted stock as to which Mr.
Davis currently has no dispositive power.
(6) Includes 20,000 shares subject to options exercisable within 60 days of
February 29, 2004 and 1,825 shares of restricted stock as to which the
named director currently has no dispositive power.
(7) Includes 20,000 shares subject to options exercisable within 60 days of
February 29, 2004 and 2,546 shares of restricted stock as to which Mr.
Glynn currently has no dispositive power.
(8) Mr. Syron disclaims beneficial ownership of 1,622 such shares owned by Mr.
Syron's spouse. Includes 20,000 shares subject to options exercisable
within 60 days of February 29, 2004 and 1,825 shares of restricted stock
as to which Mr. Syron currently has no dispositive power.
(9) Includes 1,400 shares held in a custodial account for the benefit of Mr.
Bell's minor children, 17 shares held in trust, 750,000 shares subject to
options exercisable within 60 days of February 29, 2004 and 314,514 shares
of restricted stock as to which Mr. Bell currently has no dispositive
power.
(10) Includes 150,000 shares subject to options exercisable within 60 days of
February 29, 2004, and 25,000 shares of restricted stock as to which Mr.
Benson currently has no dispositive power.
(11) Ms. Ford Goldfarb disclaims beneficial ownership of 2,250 such shares held
by her spouse. Includes 708,851 shares subject to options exercisable
within 60 days of February 29, 2004 and 65,590 shares of restricted stock
as to which Ms. Ford Goldfarb currently has no dispositive power.
(12) Mr. Moloney disclaims beneficial ownership of 6,783 such shares held in
trust. Includes 1,047 shares owned by Mr. Moloney's spouse, 700,000 shares
subject to options exercisable within 60 days of February 29, 2004 and
272,120 shares of restricted stock as to which Mr. Moloney currently has
no dispositive power.
(13) Includes (i) an aggregate of 6,918,858 shares subject to options
exercisable within 60 days of February 29, 2004; (ii) an aggregate of
1,976,781 shares with respect to which the holders currently have no
dispositive power; and (iii) an aggregate of 48,532 shares of restricted
stock as to which beneficial ownership is disclaimed by certain executive
officers and directors.
The information required by Item 12 regarding equity compensation plans is
set forth below.
Equity Compensation Plan Information
Number of shares
Number of shares to remaining available for
be issued upon future issuance under equity
exercise of Weighted-average exercise compensation plans
outstanding options, price of outstanding (excluding shares reflected
Plan Category warrants and rights options, warrants and rights in column (a))
------------- -------------------- ---------------------------- ----------------------------
(a) (b) (c)
(in thousands) (in thousands)
Equity compensation plans
approved by shareholders 22,570.9 $ 34.59 14,258.9
Equity compensation plans not
approved by shareholders -- -- --
-------------------- ---------------------------- -----------------------------
Total 22,570.9 $ 34.59 14,258.9
==================== ============================ =============================
All outstanding stock compensation grants made prior to September 28, 2003
(and restricted stock and restricted deferred stock units granted to
non-employee directors of the Company on or before December 31, 2003) vest upon
the change of control that would occur upon the closing of the contemplated
merger with Manulife. Pursuant to the definitive merger agreement with
217
JOHN HANCOCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
Manulife, no stock compensation grants made under the Incentive Plans subsequent
to September 28, 2003 (other than restricted stock and restricted deferred stock
units granted to non-employee directors of the Company on or before December 31,
2003) vest on that contemplated change in control.
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions
The Company uses, among other law firms, Hale and Dorr LLP ("Hale and
Dorr") and Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, PC ("Mintz Levin"),
for legal services. Mr. Popeo, a director, is a member and Chairman of Mintz
Levin. Mr. Fast, a director, is Of Counsel to Hale and Dorr, but retired from
the firm as a Senior Partner in 2002, and no longer participates as such in the
firm's profits or management.
Prior to enactment of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 on July 30, 2002, the
Company maintained a program under which the Company made loans available to
members of the Policy Committee in connection with a stock ownership program
pursuant to which such executives were to own a specified number of shares of
common stock. The maximum principal amount a member of the Policy Committee was
entitled to borrow under the loan program was two times his or her base salary
less the aggregate of all unpaid principal loan amounts outstanding owed by such
Policy Committee member. Interest on the principal amount of such loans was
equal to the greater of the London Interbank Offer Rate plus 1.25%, reset every
30 days, or the applicable rate of interest established from time to time
pursuant to Section 1274(d) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986. All loans made
to Policy Committee members under this program were repaid in full on March 4,
2003. The largest amount of total indebtedness outstanding under the loan
program owed by the Named Executive Officers after January 1, 2003 was: Mr.
D'Alessandro: $2,227,354; and Mr. Moloney: $1,248,683. The largest aggregate
amount of total indebtedness outstanding under this loan program owed by Policy
Committee members other than the Named Executive Officers after January 1, 2003
was $301,549.
Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services
Ernst & Young LLP has been selected by the Board to audit the consolidated
financial statements of the Company for fiscal year 2004.
The following table sets forth the approximate aggregate fees billed by
the Company's independent auditors for professional services in 2003 and 2002:
2003 2002
----------- ----------
Audit Fees (1) $10,378,348 $7,144,461
Audit-Related Fees (2) 1,982,891 1,182,077
Tax Fees (3) 417,800 1,754,400
All Other Fees (4) 15,000 --
- ----------
(1) The fees in this category were for professional services rendered in
connection with (i) the audit of the Company's annual financial statements
set forth in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K, (ii) the review of
the Company's quarterly financial statements set forth in the Company's
Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, (iii) audits of the Company's subsidiaries
and separate accounts that are required by statute or regulation, and (iv)
services that generally only the Company's independent auditors reasonably
can provide, such as comfort letters, consents and agreed upon procedures
reports.
(2) The fees in this category were for professional services rendered in
connection with (i) consultations concerning financial accounting and
reporting standards, (ii) internal control reviews, (iii) assistance
provided in evaluating the Company's exposure to certain reinsurance
arrangements, and (iv) assistance provided in the review of other
auditors' work papers in connection with merger due diligence.
(3) The fees in this category were for professional services rendered in
connection with tax strategy assistance and tax compliance services.
(4) The fees in this category were for professional services rendered in
connection with assistance provided related to an actuarial model and
process.
The Audit Committee's Policy regarding Pre-Approval of Audit and Non-Audit
Services requires that all services provided by the Company's Independent
Auditor be pre-approved by the Committee. Pursuant to that Policy, the Chair of
the Audit Committee is authorized to act on behalf of the Committee with respect
to requests for pre-approval of services to be provided by the
218
JOHN HANCOCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
Independent Auditor other than the annual audit engagement services. The Chair
is to report on any such approvals at the next regularly-scheduled Committee
meeting.
PART IV
Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules and Reports on Form 8-K
(a) Documents filed as part of this report.
1. Financial Statements (See Item 8. Financial Statements and
Supplementary Data)
Report of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Auditors
Consolidated Financial Statements
Balance Sheets
Statements of Income
Statements of Changes in Shareholders' Equity and
Comprehensive Income
Statements of Cash Flows
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
2. Financial Statement Schedules
Schedule I--Summary of Investments--Other Than Investments in
Related Parties
Schedule II--Condensed Financial Information of Registrant (Parent
Only)
Schedule III--Supplementary Insurance Information
Schedule IV--Reinsurance
Note: All other financial statement schedules are omitted because they are
inapplicable.
3. Exhibits.
Exhibit
Number Description
- ------ -----------
2.1 Plan of Reorganization (1)
2.1.1 Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of September 28, 2003, by
and among Manulife Financial Corporation, John Hancock Financial
Services, Inc. and Jupiter Merger Corporation, a Delaware
corporation and a direct wholly-owned subsidiary of Manulife
("Merger Co.") (2)
2.2 Purchase and Sale Agreement between John Hancock Life Insurance
Company, as seller, and Beacon Capital Strategic Partners, as
purchaser, for the sale of certain John Hancock home office
properties. (3).
3.1 Restated Certificate of Incorporation of John Hancock Financial
Services, Inc. (1)
3.2 Amended and Restated By-Laws of John Hancock Financial Services,
Inc. (As Adopted on February 11, 2002) (4)
10.1 Third Amendment dated as of July 25, 2003 to the $1,000,000,000
Credit Agreement dated as of August 3, 2000, as amended, among John
Hancock Financial Services, Inc., John Hancock Life Insurance
Company, The Banks listed therein, Fleet National Bank, as
Co-Administrative Agent, JPMorgan Chase Bank, as Co-Administrative
Agent, Citicorp USA, Inc., as Syndication Agent, The Bank of New
York, as Documentation Agent (364-Day Revolver) and Wachovia Bank,
National Association as Documentation Agent (364-Day Revolver),
Fleet Securities, Inc., and J.P. Morgan Securities, Inc., as Joint
Bookrunners and Joint Lead Arrangers (5)
10.1.1 Employment Continuation Agreement between John Hancock Life
Insurance Company, John Hancock Financial Services, Inc. and James
M. Benson dated April 1, 2003 (11) +
10.1.2 Amendment No. 1, dated September 28, 2003, to the Employment
Continuation Agreement dated April 1, 2003 by and among John
Hancock Life Insurance Company, John Hancock Financial Services,
Inc., James M. Benson and Manulife Financial Corporation. (12) +
219
JOHN HANCOCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
Exhibit
Number Description
- ------ -----------
10.2 Amendment No. 1, dated September 28, 2003, to the Employment
Continuation Agreement dated October 15, 2001 by and among John
Hancock Life Insurance Company, John Hancock Financial Services,
Inc., Michael A. Bell and Manulife Financial Corporation. (6) +
10.2.1 Employment Continuation Agreement between John Hancock Life
Insurance Company, John Hancock Financial Services, Inc. and
Michael A. Bell. (7) +
10.2.2 Second Amended and Restated Employment Continuation Agreement
between John Hancock Life Insurance Company, John Hancock
Financial Services, Inc. and Thomas E. Moloney. (7) +
10.2.2.1 Executive Employment Agreement between John Hancock Life Insurance
Company, John Hancock Financial Services, Inc. and Thomas E.
Moloney. (3) +
10.2.2.2 Amendment No. 1, dated September 28, 2003, to the Second Amended
and Restated Employment Continuation Agreement dated October 15,
2001 by and among John Hancock Life Insurance Company, John Hancock
Financial Services, Inc., Thomas E. Moloney and Manulife Financial
Corporation. (15) +
10.2.3 Second Amended and Restated Employment Continuation Agreement
between John Hancock Life Insurance Company, John Hancock
Financial Services, Inc. and David F. D'Alessandro. (7) +
10.2.3.1 Executive Employment Agreement between John Hancock Life Insurance
Company, John Hancock Financial Services, Inc. and David F.
D'Alessandro. (8) +
10.2.3.2 Amendment No. 1, dated September 28, 2003, to the Second Amended
and Restated Employment Continuation Agreement dated October 15,
2001 by and among John Hancock Life Insurance Company, John Hancock
Financial Services, Inc., David F. D'Alessandro and Manulife
Financial Corporation. (14) +
10.2.4 Second Amended and Restated Employment Continuation Agreement
between John Hancock Life Insurance Company, John Hancock
Financial Services, Inc. and Derek Chilvers. (7) +
10.2.5 Second Amended and Restated Employment Continuation Agreement
between John Hancock Life Insurance Company, John Hancock Financial
Services, Inc. and Maureen Ford (4)+
10.2.6 Second Amended and Restated Employment Continuation Agreement
between John Hancock Life Insurance Company, John Hancock Financial
Services, Inc. and Robert Walters (4)+
10.2.7 Amended and Restated Employment Continuation Agreement between John
Hancock Life Insurance Company, John Hancock Financial Services,
Inc. and John M. DeCiccio(4)+
10.2.7.1 Executive Employment Agreement between John Hancock Life Insurance
Company, John Hancock Financial Services, Inc. and John M. DeCiccio
(8)+
10.2.8 Amended and Restated Employment Continuation Agreement between John
Hancock Life Insurance Company, John Hancock Financial Services,
Inc. and Wayne A. Budd, dated January 1, 2003 (8)+
10.2.9 Amended and Restated Employment Continuation Agreement between John
Hancock Life Insurance Company, John Hancock Financial Services,
Inc. and Deborah H. McAneny (8)+
220
JOHN HANCOCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
Exhibit
Number Description
- ------ -----------
10.3 Fiscal Agency Agreement, dated as of February 25, 1994 by and
between John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance Company, as Issuer, and
First National Bank of Boston, as Fiscal Agent(1)
10.4 Reinsurance Agreement, dated as of July 30, 1992 by and between John
Hancock Mutual Life Insurance Company and Provident Life and
Accident Insurance Company (1)
10.5 Reinsurance Agreement, dated as of July 30, 1992 by and between John
Hancock Mutual Life Insurance Company and Provident Life and
Accident Insurance Company (1)
10.6 Coinsurance Agreement, dated as of March 1, 1997 by and between John
Hancock Mutual Life Insurance Company and UNICARE Life & Health
Insurance Company (1)
10.7 Letter of Credit Agreement, dated as of January 2, 1997 by and among
John Hancock Mutual LifeInsurance Company, Banks named therein and
Morgan Guaranty Trust Company of New York as Issuing Bank and Agent
(1)
10.8 Long-Term Incentive Plan for Senior Executives (as Amended and
Restated Effective February 6, 2003) (8)+
10.9 Incentive Compensation Plan for Certain Senior Executives (as
Amended and Restated Effective February 6, 2003) (8)+
10.10 Form of Shareholder Rights Agreement (1)
10.10.1 Amendment No. 1 to the Rights Agreement (As Adopted on March 4,
2002) (4)
10.11 1999 Long-Term Stock Incentive Plan (As Amended and Restated as of
May 14, 2001) (9)+
10.13 Deferred Compensation Plan for Non-Employee Directors (8)+
10.14 Non-Employee Directors' Long-Term Stock Incentive Plan (8)+
10.15 Deferred Compensation Plan for Executives (8)+
10.16 Deferred Equity Rights Program for Non-Employee Directors (8) +
21.1 Subsidiaries of the Registrant. (10)
23.1 Consent of Ernst & Young LLP (10)
31.1 Chief Executive Officer Certification Pursuant to Rules 13a-14 and
15d-14 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. (10)
31.2 Chief Financial Officer Certification Pursuant to Rules 13a-14 and
15d-14 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. (10)
32.1 Chief Executive Officer certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
350, as adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
(10)
32.2 Chief Financial Officer certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
(10)
- -------------------------------------------------------------
The principal amount of debt outstanding under each instrument (excepting those
listed above) defining the rights of holders of our long-term debt does not
exceed ten percent (10%) of our total assets on a consolidated basis. The
Company agrees to furnish the SEC, upon request, a copy of each instrument
defining the rights of holders of our long-term debt.
221
JOHN HANCOCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
Any exhibit not included with this Form 10-K when furnished to any shareholder
of record will be furnished to such shareholder upon written request and payment
of up to $.25 per page plus postage (except no payment will be required for the
financial statements and schedules included in Exhibit 13 if not included). Such
requests should be directed to John Hancock Financial Services, Inc., Investor
Relations, John Hancock Place, Post Office Box 111, Boston, Massachusetts 02117.
- ----------
(1) Previously filed as an exhibit to John Hancock Financial Services, Inc.'s
S-1 Registration Statement (file no. 333-87271), and incorporated by
reference herein.
(2) Previously filed as an exhibit to John Hancock Financial Services, Inc.'s
current report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on October 1, 2003, and incorporated by reference herein.
(3) Previously filed as an exhibit to John Hancock Financial Services, Inc.'s
quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2003, and
incorporated by reference herein
(4) Previously filed as an exhibit to John Hancock Financial Services, Inc.'s
annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001, and
incorporated by reference herein.
(5) Previously filed as an exhibit to John Hancock Financial Services, Inc.'s
quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2003, and
incorporated by reference herein.
(6) Previously filed as an exhibit to John Hancock Financial Services, Inc.'s
quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2003,
and incorporated by reference herein.
(7) Previously filed as an exhibit to John Hancock Financial Services, Inc.'s
quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2001,
and incorporated by reference herein.
(8) Previously filed as an exhibit to John Hancock Financial Services, Inc.'s
annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002, and
incorporated by reference herein.
(9) Previously filed with John Hancock Financial Services, Inc. definitive
proxy statement for the 2001 annual meeting of shareholders, and
incorporated by reference herein.
(10) Filed herewith.
(11) Previously filed as exhibit 10.2 to John Hancock Financial Services,
Inc.'s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2003,
and incorporated by reference herein.
(12) Previously filed as exhibit 10.3 to John Hancock Financial Services,
Inc.'s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30,
2003, and incorporated by reference herein.
(13) Previously filed as exhibit 10.4 to John Hancock Financial Services,
Inc.'s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30,
2003, and incorporated by reference herein.
(14) Previously filed as exhibit 10.5 to John Hancock Financial Services,
Inc.'s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30,
2003, and incorporated by reference herein.
(15) Previously filed as exhibit 10.6 to John Hancock Financial Services,
Inc.'s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30,
2003, and incorporated by reference herein.
+ Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.
(b) Reports on Form 8-K.
During the Fourth Quarter of 2003 the Company filed the following Current
Reports on Form 8-K:
On October 1, 2003, the Company filed a Current Report on Form 8-K dated
September 28, 2003, reporting under Item 5 thereof the Company entered into and
Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of September 28, 2003, by and among
Manulife Financial Corporation, John Hancock and Jupiter Merger Corporation, a
subsidiary of Manulife.
On October 31, 2003, the Company filed a Current Report on Form 8-K, dated
October 30, 2003, reporting under Item 12 thereof the Company's operating and
financial results for the third quarter of 2003.
(c) See Item 15 (a) 3.
(d) See Item 15 (a) 2.
222
JOHN HANCOCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
SCHEDULE I -- SUMMARY OF INVESTMENTS --
OTHER THAN INVESTMENTS IN RELATED PARTIES
As of December 31, 2003
Column A Column B Column C Column D
- --------- -------- -------- --------
Amount at Which
Shown in the
Consolidated
Type of Investment Cost(2) Value Balance Sheet
- ------------------ ------- ----- -------------
(in millions)
Fixed maturity securities, available-for-sale:
Bonds:
United States government and government agencies and authorities .. $ 297.0 $ 300.5 $ 300.5
States, municipalities and political subdivisions ................. 491.3 505.2 505.2
Foreign governments ............................................... 1,955.6 2,196.8 2,196.8
Public utilities .................................................. 4,791.3 5,160.6 5,160.6
Convertibles and bonds with warrants attached ..................... 336.7 413.9 413.9
All other corporate bonds ......................................... 40,455.7 42,703.7 42,703.7
Certificates of deposits .......................................... -- -- --
Redeemable preferred stock ........................................ 569.2 606.3 606.3
---------------------------------------
Total fixed maturity securities, available-for-sale ............... 48,896.8 51,887.0 51,887.0
=======================================
Equity securities, available-for-sale:
Common stocks:
Public utilities .................................................. 12.8 17.2 17.2
Banks, trust and insurance companies .............................. 18.5 23.3 23.3
Industrial, miscellaneous and all other ........................... 335.0 415.1 415.1
Non-redeemable preferred stock .................................... 299.5 339.5 339.5
---------------------------------------
Total equity securities, available-for-sale ....................... 665.8 795.1 795.1
=======================================
Fixed maturity securities, held-to-maturity:
Bonds
United States government and government agencies and authorities .. 3.5 3.6 3.5
States, municipalities and political subdivisions ................. 257.8 272.4 257.8
Foreign governments ............................................... -- -- --
Public utilities .................................................. 142.0 142.0 142.0
Convertibles and bonds with warrants attached ..................... -- -- --
All other corporate bonds ......................................... 1,095.3 1,105.0 1,095.3
Certificates of deposits .......................................... -- -- --
Redeemable preferred stock ........................................ -- -- --
---------------------------------------
Total fixed maturity securities, held-to-maturity ................. $ 1,498.6 $ 1,523.0 $ 1,498.6
=======================================
The condensed financial information should be read in conjunction with the
audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto.
223
JOHN HANCOCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
SCHEDULE I -- SUMMARY OF INVESTMENTS --
OTHER THAN INVESTMENTS IN RELATED PARTIES -- (CONTINUED)
As of December 31, 2003
Column A Column B Column C Column D
- -------- -------- -------- --------
Amount at Which
Shown in the
Consolidated
Type of Investment Cost(2) Value Balance Sheet
- ------------------ ------- ----- -------------
(in millions)
Fixed maturity securities, trading:
Bonds:
All other corporate bonds ................. $ 40.7 $ 42.2 $ 42.2
---------------------------------------------------
Total fixed maturity securities, trading .. 40.7 42.2 42.2
---------------------------------------------------
Equity securities, trading:
Common stocks:
Public utilities .......................... 1.0 1.2 1.2
Banks, trust and insurance companies ...... 5.4 7.2 7.2
Industrial, miscellaneous and all other ... 428.9 440.0 440.0
Non-redeemable preferred stock ............ -- -- --
---------------------------------------------------
Total equity securities, trading .......... 435.3 448.4 448.4
---------------------------------------------------
Mortgage loans on real estate, net(1) ..... 13,002.2 XXXX 12,936.0
Real estate, net:
Investment properties(1) .................. 238.3 XXXX 193.1
Acquired in satisfaction of debt(1) ....... 1.9 XXXX 1.9
Policy loans .............................. 2,117.9 XXXX 2,117.9
Other long-term investments ............... 3,011.3 XXXX 3,011.3
Short-term investments .................... 121.6 XXXX 121.6
---------------------------------------------------
Total investments ......................... $70,030.4 $54,695.7 $73,053.1
===================================================
- ----------
(1) Difference between Column B and Column D is primarily due to valuation
allowances and accumulated depreciation of real estate. See notes to the
consolidated financial statements.
(2) Difference between Column B and Column C is primarily due to operating
gains (losses) of investments in limited partnerships.
The condensed financial information should be read in conjunction with the
audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto.
224
JOHN HANCOCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
SCHEDULE II -- CONDENSED FINANCIAL INFORMATION
OF REGISTRANT (Parent Only)
BALANCE SHEET
December 31,
------------
2003 2002
---- ----
(in millions)
Assets
Investments:
Short-term investments ................................................. $ 5.0 --
Investment in unconsolidated subsidiaries .............................. 9,045.1 $ 7,003.7
------------------------
Total Investments ............................................. 9,050.1 7,003.7
Cash and cash equivalents .............................................. 17.6 14.6
Accounts receivable .................................................... 3.0 6.8
Dividend receivable from unconsolidated subsidiary ..................... 100.0 --
Income taxes receivable ................................................ 35.1 --
Other assets ........................................................... 23.4 18.9
------------------------
Total Assets .................................................. $ 9,229.2 $ 7,044.0
========================
Liabilities and Shareholders' Equity
Liabilities:
Interest payable ....................................................... 2.5 2.7
Income taxes payable ................................................... -- 1.2
Dividends payable to shareholders ...................................... 19.0 15.8
Other liabilities ...................................................... 16.7 --
Short-term debt ........................................................ 381.3 249.4
Long-term debt ......................................................... 594.0 563.8
------------------------
Total Liabilities ............................................. 1,013.5 832.9
Shareholders' Equity:
Common stock, $.01 par value; 2.0 billion shares authorized;
319.8 million and 317.5 million shares issued, respectively ......... 3.2 3.2
Additional paid in capital ............................................. 5,174.0 5,127.9
Retained earnings ...................................................... 2,318.7 1,614.0
Accumulated other comprehensive income ................................. 1,788.8 523.2
Treasury stock, at cost (30.0 million shares and 29.5 million shares,
respectively) ........................................................ (1,069.0) (1,057.2)
------------------------
Total Shareholders' Equity .................................... 8,215.7 6,211.1
------------------------
Total Liabilities and Shareholders' Equity .................... $ 9,229.2 $ 7,044.0
========================
The condensed financial information should be read in conjunction with the
audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto.
225
JOHN HANCOCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
SCHEDULE II -- CONDENSED FINANCIAL INFORMATION
OF REGISTRANT (Parent Only)
STATEMENT OF INCOME
Year Ended
December 31,
------------
2003 2002
---- ----
(in millions)
Revenues
Net investment income ........................... $ 0.2 $ 0.8
Other revenue ................................... -- 0.1
----------------------
Total revenues .......................... 0.2 0.9
Benefits and expenses
Other operating costs and expenses .............. 49.7 57.5
----------------------
Total benefits and expenses ............. 49.7 57.5
Loss before income taxes ................................. (49.5) (56.6)
Income taxes ............................................. (24.0) (25.6)
----------------------
Net loss after taxes ..................................... (25.5) (31.0)
Equity in the net income of unconsolidated subsidiaries .. 831.5 530.5
----------------------
Net income ............................................... $806.0 $499.5
======================
The condensed financial information should be read in conjunction with the
audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto.
226
JOHN HANCOCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
SCHEDULE II -- CONDENSED FINANCIAL INFORMATION
OF REGISTRANT (Parent Only)
STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
Year Ended
December 31,
------------
2003 2002
---- ----
(in millions)
Net income ............................................................................... $ 806.0 $ 499.5
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization ....................................................... 1.6 0.7
Equity in the undistributed net income of unconsolidated subsidiaries ............... (831.5) (530.5)
Amounts received from unconsolidated subsidiaries related to stock option plans ..... 46.1 28.6
Decrease in accounts receivable .................................................... 3.8 40.1
Increase (decrease) in other assets and liabilities, net ............................ 10.8 (6.1)
Increase (decrease) in interest payable ............................................. (0.2) 0.8
Increase in dividends payable to shareholders ....................................... 3.2 --
(Increase) decrease in income taxes receivable ...................................... (36.3) 15.4
--------------------
Net cash provided by operating activities ................................. 3.5 48.5
Cash flows from investing activities:
Capital contributed to unconsolidated subsidiaries ..................................... (114.3) (91.5)
Dividends received from unconsolidated subsidiaries .................................... 100.0 111.0
Purchase of short-term investments ..................................................... (5.0) --
--------------------
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities ....................... (19.3) 19.5
Cash flows from financing activities:
Acquisition of treasury stock .......................................................... (11.8) (385.0)
Dividends paid on common stock ......................................................... (101.3) (92.2)
Net increase in commercial paper ....................................................... 131.9 249.4
Issuance of long-term debt ............................................................. -- 65.0
--------------------
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities ....................... 18.8 (162.8)
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents ...................... 3.0 (94.8)
--------------------
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year ........................................... 14.6 109.4
--------------------
Cash and cash equivalents at the end of year ............................................. $ 17.6 $ 14.6
====================
The condensed financial information should be read in conjunction with the
audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto.
227
JOHN HANCOCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
SCHEDULE III -- SUPPLEMENTARY INSURANCE INFORMATION
As of December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001 and for each of the years then ended
(in millions)
Future Policy Other Policy
Benefits, Losses, Claims
Deferred Policy Claims and Unearned and Benefits Premium
Segment Acquisition Costs Loss Expenses Premiums(1) Payable(1) Revenue
- ------- ----------------- ------------- ----------- ---------- -------
2003:
Protection ......................... $ 3,118.5 $23,079.1 $ 333.3 $ 129.1 $ 1,963.5
Asset Gathering .................... 634.7 10,850.8 -- 0.1 35.3
Guaranteed & Structured Financial
Products ....................... 7.8 28,343.0 73.6 2.7 466.3
Investment Management .............. -- -- -- -- --
Maritime Life ...................... 456.9 6,900.5 725.5 178.7 1,011.8
Corporate & Other .................. 83.1 1,315.3 8.0 35.6 670.8
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total ...................... $ 4,301.0 $70,488.7 $ 1,140.4 $ 346.2 $ 4,147.7
=================================================================================
2002:
Protection ......................... $ 2,917.2 $20,813.8 $ 300.3 $ 108.2 $ 1,826.0
Asset Gathering .................... 681.2 8,952.8 -- 0.1 29.3
Guaranteed & Structured Financial
Products ....................... 8.6 27,076.6 68.6 2.9 295.9
Investment Management .............. -- 225.0 -- -- --
Maritime Life ...................... 317.4 5,261.9 521.8 43.6 681.3
Corporate & Other .................. 71.9 1,257.2 5.1 50.8 544.6
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total ...................... $ 3,996.3 $63,587.3 $ 895.8 $ 205.6 $ 3,377.1
=================================================================================
2001:
Protection ......................... $ 2,743.2 $18,369.0 $ 280.4 $ 102.0 $ 1,688.1
Asset Gathering .................... 616.1 6,689.4 -- 0.1 74.8
Guaranteed & Structured Financial
Products ....................... 8.8 24,401.7 65.7 4.9 899.8
Investment Management .............. -- -- -- -- --
Maritime Life ...................... 292.7 5,211.7 459.5 57.7 618.4
Corporate & Other .................. 56.6 1,607.8 3.7 98.0 570.2
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total ...................... $ 3,717.4 $56,279.6 $ 809.3 $ 262.7 $ 3,851.3
=================================================================================
- ----------
(1) Unearned premiums and other policy claims and benefits payable are
included in these amounts.
The condensed financial information should be read in conjunction with the
audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto.
228
JOHN HANCOCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
SCHEDULE III -- SUPPLEMENTARY INSURANCE INFORMATION -- (CONTINUED)
As of December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001 and for each of the years then ended
(in millions)
Amortization of
Deferred Policy
Benefits, Acquisition Costs,
Claims, Excluding Amounts
Losses, and Related to Net Realized Other
Net Investment Settlement Investment and Other Operating
Segment Income(2) Expenses Gains (Losses) Expenses(2)
- ------- --------- -------- -------------- -----------
2003:
Protection .................................. $ 1,434.4 $ 2,299.9 $ 211.7 $ 375.1
Asset Gathering ............................. 710.1 500.7 111.4 356.8
Guaranteed & Structured Financial Products .. 1,695.4 1,618.1 2.3 86.5
Investment Management ....................... 17.1 -- -- 97.0
Maritime Life ............................... 339.1 1,078.7 (14.2) 315.4
Corporate & Other ........................... 30.9 586.9 4.3 524.9
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Total ............................... $ 4,227.0 $ 6,084.3 $ 315.5 $ 1,755.7
=====================================================================
2002:
Protection .................................. $ 1,326.6 $ 2,091.0 $ 185.7 $ 367.0
Asset Gathering ............................. 575.7 446.7 140.5 376.5
Guaranteed & Structured Financial Products .. 1,715.1 1,527.8 2.2 65.9
Investment Management ....................... 15.1 -- -- 92.1
Maritime Life ............................... 313.0 840.2 17.5 239.8
Corporate & Other ........................... (11.4) 482.0 4.3 377.3
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Total ............................... $ 3,934.1 $ 5,387.7 $ 350.2 $ 1,518.6
=====================================================================
2001:
Protection .................................. $ 1,264.7 $ 1,882.2 $ 182.2 $ 364.3
Asset Gathering ............................. 498.5 441.6 75.0 473.8
Guaranteed & Structured Financial Products .. 1,835.6 2,328.7 2.4 61.9
Investment Management ....................... 28.7 -- -- 97.9
Maritime Life ............................... 282.1 709.8 43.9 246.9
Corporate & Other ........................... 35.3 542.4 3.3 276.8
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Total ............................... $ 3,944.9 $ 5,904.7 $ 306.8 $ 1,521.6
=====================================================================
- ----------
(2) Allocations of net investment income and certain operating expenses are
based on a number of assumptions and estimates, and reported operating
results would change by segment if different methods were applied.
The condensed financial information should be read in conjunction with the
audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto.
229
JOHN HANCOCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
SCHEDULE IV -- REINSURANCE
As of December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001 and for each of the years then ended
(in millions)
Percentage of
Gross Ceded to Other Assumed from Net Amount
Amount Companies Other Companies Amount Assumed to Net
------ --------- --------------- ------ --------------
2003:
Life insurance in force ........ $460,501.6 $287,432.4 75,965.3 249,034.5 30.5%
===========================================================
Premiums:
Life insurance ................. 3,494.4 808.9 494.2 3,179.7 15.5%
Accident and health insurance .. 777.2 8.0 198.8 968.0 20.5%
-----------------------------------------------------------
Total .................. 4,271.6 816.9 693.0 4,147.7 16.7%
===========================================================
2002:
Life insurance in force ........ $437,358.5 $231,138.6 $ 34,544.8 $240,764.7 14.3%
===========================================================
Premiums:
Life insurance ................. $ 3,000.3 $ 718.9 $ 307.3 $ 2,588.7 11.9%
Accident and health insurance .. 620.4 (4.1) 163.9 788.4 20.8%
-----------------------------------------------------------
Total .................. $ 3,620.7 $ 714.8 $ 471.2 $ 3,377.1 14.0%
===========================================================
2001:
Life insurance in force ........ $397,486.1 $161,341.5 $ 27,940.6 $264,085.2 10.6%
===========================================================
Premiums:
Life insurance ................. $ 3,560.7 $ 624.2 $ 235.4 $ 3,171.9 7.4%
Accident and health insurance .. 529.7 44.8 194.5 679.4 28.6%
-----------------------------------------------------------
Total .................. $ 4,090.4 $ 669.0 $ 429.9 $ 3,851.3 11.2%
===========================================================
Note: The life insurance caption represents principally premiums from
traditional life insurance and life-contingent immediate annuities and excludes
deposits on investment products and the universal life insurance products.
The condensed financial information should be read in conjunction with the
audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto.
230
JOHN HANCOCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on
its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
JOHN HANCOCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
By: /s/ Thomas E. Moloney
--------------------------------------
Thomas E. Moloney
Senior Executive Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer
Date: March 5, 2004
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this
report has been signed by the following persons in the capacities and on the
dates indicated.
Signature Title Date
--------- ----- ----
/s/ DAVID F. D'ALESSANDRO Chairman, President, Chief Executive Officer March 5, 2004
- ------------------------- and Director (Principal Executive Officer)
David F. D'Alessandro
/s/ THOMAS E. MOLONEY Senior Executive Vice President and Chief March 5, 2004
- --------------------- Financial Officer (Principal Financial
Thomas E. Moloney and Accounting Officer)
/s/ WAYNE A. BUDD Executive Vice President, General Counsel March 5, 2004
- ----------------- and Director
Wayne A. Budd
/s/ JOHN M. CONNORS, JR. Director March 5, 2004
- ------------------------
John M. Connors, Jr.
/s/ ROBERT E. FAST Director March 5, 2004
- ------------------
Robert E. Fast
/s/ RICHARD B. DEWOLFE Director March 5, 2004
- ----------------------
Richard B. DeWolfe
/s/ THOMAS P. GLYNN Director March 5, 2004
- -------------------
Thomas P. Glynn
/s/ MICHAEL C. HAWLEY Director March 5, 2004
- ---------------------
Michael C. Hawley
/s/ EDWARD H. LINDE Director March 5, 2004
- -------------------
Edward H. Linde
/s/ JUDITH A. MCHALE Director March 5, 2004
- --------------------
Judith A. McHale
/s/ R. Robert Popeo Director March 5, 2004
- -------------------
R. Robert Popeo
/s/ Richard F. Syron Director March 5, 2004
- --------------------
Richard F. Syron
/s/ Robert J. Tarr, Jr. Director March 5, 2004
- -----------------------
Robert J. Tarr, Jr.
/s/ Robert J. Davis Director March 5, 2004
- -------------------
Robert J. Davis
231