United States
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-Q
(Mark One)
|X| |
Quarterly report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2004 |
or
|_| |
Transition report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 for the transaction period from____________to ___________. |
Commission file number 1-11983
FPIC Insurance Group, Inc.
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)
Florida |
|
59-3359111 |
(State or Other Jurisdiction of |
|
(IRS Employer |
225 Water Street, Suite 1400, Jacksonville,
Florida 32202
(Address of Principal Executive Offices) (Zip Code)
(904) 354-2482
(Registrants Telephone Number, Including Area Code)
www.fpic.com
(Registrants Internet Address)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes |X| No |_|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934). Yes |X| No |_|
As of May 6, 2004, there were 9,975,534 shares of the registrants common stock outstanding.
FPIC Insurance Group, Inc.
Index to Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
Part I |
Financial Information |
|
Page |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 1. |
Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements of FPIC Insurance Group, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and |
|
16 |
|
|
32 |
||
|
32 |
||
|
|
|
|
Part II |
Other Information |
|
Page |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32 |
||
|
32 |
||
|
32 |
||
|
32 |
||
|
32 |
||
|
33 |
||
|
|
|
|
|
33 |
Condensed
Consolidated Statements of Financial Position
As of March 31, 2004 and December 31, 2003
(in thousands, except common share data)
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
Mar 31, |
|
Dec 31, |
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Cash and cash
equivalents |
|
$ |
84,670 |
|
|
85,064 |
|
||
|
Bonds and U.S.
Government securities, available for sale |
|
|
538,993 |
|
|
528,647 |
|
||
|
Equity
securities, available for sale |
|
|
10 |
|
|
9 |
|
||
|
Other invested
assets ((Includes related party amounts of $788 and $788) Note 11) |
|
|
4,732 |
|
|
4,774 |
|
||
|
Real estate, net |
|
|
4,099 |
|
|
4,207 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Total cash and
investments |
|
|
632,504 |
|
|
622,701 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Premiums
receivable, net ((Includes related party amounts of $7,994 and $8,608) Note 11) |
|
|
113,718 |
|
|
101,262 |
|
||
|
Accrued
investment income |
|
|
5,981 |
|
|
6,153 |
|
||
|
Reinsurance
recoverable on paid losses (Note 11) |
|
|
28,827 |
|
|
15,950 |
|
||
|
Due from
reinsurers on unpaid losses and advance premiums ((Includes related party amounts of $90,153 and $82,474) Note 11) |
|
|
294,362 |
|
|
275,766 |
|
||
|
Ceded unearned premiums
((Includes related party amounts of $13,285 and $16,486) Note 11) |
|
|
77,666 |
|
|
71,435 |
|
||
|
Property and
equipment, net |
|
|
5,058 |
|
|
5,248 |
|
||
|
Deferred policy
acquisition costs ((Includes related party amounts of $3,271 and $3,500) Note 11) |
|
|
7,167 |
|
|
6,209 |
|
||
|
Deferred income
taxes |
|
|
33,089 |
|
|
34,819 |
|
||
|
Prepaid expenses |
|
|
5,807 |
|
|
5,363 |
|
||
|
Goodwill |
|
|
18,870 |
|
|
18,870 |
|
||
|
Intangible assets |
|
|
727 |
|
|
782 |
|
||
|
Federal income
tax receivable |
|
|
|
|
|
2,179 |
|
||
|
Other assets
(Note 11) |
|
|
20,453 |
|
|
16,393 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
1,244,229 |
|
|
1,183,130 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Liabilities
and Shareholders Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Losses and loss
adjustment expenses ((Includes related party amounts of $21,500 and $20,555) Note 11) |
|
$ |
588,933 |
|
|
574,529 |
|
||
|
Unearned premiums
((Includes related party amounts of $45,492 and $47,240) Note 11) |
|
|
192,258 |
|
|
177,435 |
|
||
|
Reinsurance
payable ((Includes related party amounts of $12,894 and $11,761) Note 11) |
|
|
155,246 |
|
|
138,082 |
|
||
|
Paid in advance
and unprocessed premiums |
|
|
5,103 |
|
|
11,766 |
|
||
|
Long term debt |
|
|
46,083 |
|
|
46,083 |
|
||
|
Deferred credit
((Related party) Note 11) |
|
|
7,493 |
|
|
7,729 |
|
||
|
Deferred ceding
commission |
|
|
4,651 |
|
|
3,126 |
|
||
|
Federal income
tax payable |
|
|
1,284 |
|
|
|
|
||
|
Accrued expenses
and other liabilities (Note 11) |
|
|
45,090 |
|
|
37,723 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
1,046,141 |
|
|
996,473 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Commitments and
contingencies (Note 7) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Common stock,
$0.10 par value, 50,000,000 shares authorized; 9,960,534 and 9,770,843 shares issued and outstanding at March 31, 2004 and December 31, 2003, respectively |
|
|
996 |
|
|
977 |
|
||
|
Additional
paid-in capital |
|
|
45,527 |
|
|
43,705 |
|
||
|
Accumulated other
comprehensive income, net of deferred income taxes |
|
|
6,856 |
|
|
4,276 |
|
||
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
144,709 |
|
|
137,699 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Total shareholders
equity |
|
|
198,088 |
|
|
186,657 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Total liabilities
and shareholders equity |
|
$ |
1,244,229 |
|
|
1,183,130 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
See accompanying notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements.
3
Condensed
Consolidated Statements of Income and Comprehensive Income
For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2004 and 2003
(in thousands, except per common share data)
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
||||||||
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|
||||||||
|
|
Mar 31, |
|
Mar 31, |
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
Net premiums
earned (Note 11) |
|
$ |
35,012 |
|
|
28,909 |
|
|||
|
Claims
administration and management fees (Note 11) |
|
|
12,084 |
|
|
8,665 |
|
|||
|
Net investment
income |
|
|
5,621 |
|
|
4,503 |
|
|||
|
Commission income |
|
|
1,843 |
|
|
1,584 |
|
|||
|
Net realized
investment gains (Note 2) |
|
|
2,806 |
|
|
238 |
|
|||
|
Finance charges
and other income (Note 11) |
|
|
197 |
|
|
231 |
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
Total revenues |
|
|
57,563 |
|
|
44,130 |
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
Net losses and
loss adjustment expenses (Note 11) |
|
|
29,374 |
|
|
26,634 |
|
|||
|
Other
underwriting expenses (Note 11) |
|
|
3,503 |
|
|
2,504 |
|
|||
|
Claims
administration and management expenses |
|
|
10,513 |
|
|
8,342 |
|
|||
|
Interest expense
on debt |
|
|
590 |
|
|
1,163 |
|
|||
|
Other expenses
(Note 11) |
|
|
1,841 |
|
|
1,311 |
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
Total expenses |
|
|
45,821 |
|
|
39,954 |
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Income from operations
before income taxes |
|
|
11,742 |
|
|
4,176 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
Less: Income tax expense |
|
|
4,732 |
|
|
1,416 |
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Net income |
|
$ |
7,010 |
|
|
2,760 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Basic earnings per common
share |
|
$ |
0.71 |
|
|
0.29 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Diluted earnings per
common share |
|
$ |
0.68 |
|
|
0.29 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Basic weighted average
common shares outstanding |
|
|
9,878 |
|
|
9,409 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Diluted weighted average
common shares outstanding |
|
|
10,331 |
|
|
9,416 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Comprehensive
Income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
Net income |
|
$ |
7,010 |
|
|
2,760 |
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
Other
comprehensive income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Unrealized
holding gains (losses) on debt and equity securities |
|
|
4,856 |
|
|
(344 |
) |
|||
|
Unrealized
holding (losses) gains and amortization on derivative financial instruments |
|
|
(657 |
) |
|
435 |
|
|||
|
Income tax
expense related to unrealized gains and losses |
|
|
(1,619 |
) |
|
(12 |
) |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
Other
comprehensive income |
|
|
2,580 |
|
|
79 |
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
Comprehensive
income |
|
$ |
9,590 |
|
|
2,839 |
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
See accompanying notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements.
4
Condensed
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders Equity
For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2004 and the Year Ended December 31, 2003
|
|
Common |
|
Additional |
|
Accumulated |
|
Retained |
|
Total |
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Balances at December 31,
2002 |
|
$ |
939 |
|
|
38,322 |
|
|
5,525 |
|
|
121,127 |
|
|
165,913 |
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,572 |
|
|
16,572 |
|
|
Minimum pension
liability adjustment, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(140 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(140 |
) |
|
Unrealized loss
on debt and equity securities, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,835 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(2,835 |
) |
|
Unrealized gain
on derivative financial instruments, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
486 |
|
|
|
|
|
486 |
|
|
Settlement
of derivative financial instrument, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,532 |
|
|
|
|
|
1,532 |
|
|
Amortization of
unrealized loss on derivative financial instruments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(292 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(292 |
) |
|
Issuance of
shares |
|
|
38 |
|
|
4,385 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,423 |
|
|
Income tax
reductions relating to exercise of stock options |
|
|
|
|
|
998 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
998 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balances at December 31,
2003 |
|
|
977 |
|
|
43,705 |
|
|
4,276 |
|
|
137,699 |
|
|
186,657 |
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,010 |
|
|
7,010 |
|
|
Unrealized gain
on debt and equity securities, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,983 |
|
|
|
|
|
2,983 |
|
|
Unrealized loss
on derivative financial instruments, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(403 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(403 |
) |
|
Issuance of
shares |
|
|
19 |
|
|
1,822 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,841 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balances at March 31, 2004
(unaudited) |
|
$ |
996 |
|
|
45,527 |
|
|
6,856 |
|
|
144,709 |
|
|
198,088 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements.
5
FPIC Insurance Group, Inc.
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2004 and 2003
(in thousands)
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
||||||||
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|
||||||||
|
|
Mar 31, |
|
Mar 31, |
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Cash flows from operating
activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
Net income |
|
$ |
7,010 |
|
|
2,760 |
|
|||
|
Adjustments to
reconcile net income to cash provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Depreciation,
amortization and accretion |
|
|
2,557 |
|
|
(1,910 |
) |
|||
|
Realized gains on
investments |
|
|
(2,806 |
) |
|
(238 |
) |
|||
|
Net losses from
other invested assets |
|
|
118 |
|
|
60 |
|
|||
|
Bad debt expense |
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|||
|
Deferred income
tax expense |
|
|
111 |
|
|
532 |
|
|||
|
Other changes in
assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Premiums
receivable, net |
|
|
(12,456 |
) |
|
(6,349 |
) |
|||
|
Accrued
investment income |
|
|
172 |
|
|
253 |
|
|||
|
Reinsurance
recoverable on paid losses |
|
|
(12,877 |
) |
|
809 |
|
|||
|
Due from
reinsurers on unpaid losses |
|
|
(18,596 |
) |
|
(29,408 |
) |
|||
|
Ceded unearned
premiums |
|
|
(6,231 |
) |
|
(8,623 |
) |
|||
|
Deferred policy
acquisition costs |
|
|
(2,350 |
) |
|
852 |
|
|||
|
Prepaid expenses |
|
|
(444 |
) |
|
152 |
|
|||
|
Federal income
taxes |
|
|
3,464 |
|
|
(2,226 |
) |
|||
|
Other assets |
|
|
(3,353 |
) |
|
137 |
|
|||
|
Losses and loss
adjustment expenses |
|
|
14,404 |
|
|
33,038 |
|
|||
|
Unearned premiums |
|
|
14,823 |
|
|
18,705 |
|
|||
|
Reinsurance
payable |
|
|
17,164 |
|
|
10,901 |
|
|||
|
Paid in advance
and unprocessed premiums |
|
|
(6,663 |
) |
|
(7,994 |
) |
|||
|
Deferred ceding
commission |
|
|
2,271 |
|
|
3,099 |
|
|||
|
Accrued expenses
and other liabilities |
|
|
974 |
|
|
8,734 |
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
Net cash (used
in) provided by operating activities |
|
|
(2,708 |
) |
|
23,287 |
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Cash flows from investing
activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
Proceeds from
sale or maturity of bonds and U.S. Government securities |
|
|
199,098 |
|
|
136,110 |
|
|||
|
Purchase of bonds
and U.S. Government securities |
|
|
(198,313 |
) |
|
(156,001 |
) |
|||
|
Proceeds from
sale of other invested assets |
|
|
62 |
|
|
306 |
|
|||
|
Proceeds from
sale of real estate investments |
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Purchase of real
estate investments |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
|
|||
|
Purchase of
property and equipment |
|
|
(412 |
) |
|
(1,580 |
) |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
Net cash provided
by (used in) investing activities |
|
|
473 |
|
|
(21,165 |
) |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Cash flows from financing
activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
Payment of term
loan |
|
|
|
|
|
(1,458 |
) |
|||
|
Issuance of
common stock |
|
|
1,841 |
|
|
145 |
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
Net cash provided
by (used in) financing activities |
|
|
1,841 |
|
|
(1,313 |
) |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Net (decrease) increase in
cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(394 |
) |
|
809 |
|
||||
Cash and cash equivalents
at beginning of period |
|
|
85,064 |
|
|
86,589 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Cash and cash equivalents
at end of period |
|
$ |
84,670 |
|
|
87,398 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Supplemental disclosure of
cash flow information: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
Interest paid on
long term debt |
|
$ |
617 |
|
|
1,106 |
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
Federal income
taxes paid |
|
$ |
500 |
|
|
3,300 |
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
Federal income
tax refunds received |
|
$ |
|
|
|
346 |
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Supplemental disclosure of
noncash investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
Due (to) from
broker on unsettled investment trades, net |
|
$ |
(5,039 |
) |
|
12,976 |
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
See accompanying notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements.
6
FPIC Insurance Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(In Thousands, Except as Noted)
1. |
Organization and
Basis of Presentation |
|
|
|
The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements represent the consolidation of FPIC Insurance Group, Inc. (FPIC) and all majority owned and controlled subsidiaries. The statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP). All significant transactions between the parent and consolidated subsidiaries have been eliminated. Reference is made to our most recently filed Form 10-K, which includes information necessary for understanding our businesses and financial statement presentations. In particular, our significant accounting policies are presented in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements included in that report. |
|
|
|
The condensed consolidated quarterly financial statements are unaudited. These statements include all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring accruals, that are, in the opinion of management, necessary for the fair presentation of results for interim periods. Certain prior period data has been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation. The results reported in these condensed consolidated quarterly financial statements should not be regarded as necessarily indicative of results that may be expected for the entire year. For example, the timing and magnitude of claim losses incurred by our insurance subsidiaries due to the estimation process inherent in determining the liability for losses and loss adjustment expenses (LAE) can be relatively more significant to results of interim periods than to results for a full year. Also, variations in the amount and timing of realized investment gains and losses could cause significant variations in periodic net income. |
|
|
|
Certain prior period amounts presented in the condensed consolidated financial statements for the three months ended March 31, 2003 have been reclassified to conform with the current presentation. |
|
|
|
Stock-Based Compensation |
|
|
|
FPIC has elected to adopt Financial Accounting Standard No. (FAS) 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation on a disclosure basis only and measure stock-based compensation in accordance with Accounting Principles Board No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, using intrinsic values with appropriate disclosures under the fair value based method as required by FAS 123 and FAS 148, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, Transition and Disclosure. Generally, the exercise price for stock options granted to an employee equals the fair market value of FPIC common stock at the date of grant, thereby resulting in no recognition of compensation expense. |
7
FPIC Insurance Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(In Thousands, Except as Noted)
|
Had compensation cost for FPICs stock option plans been determined based on the fair value method set forth in FAS 123, FPICs net income and basic and diluted earnings per common share would have been impacted as follows: |
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
Mar 31, |
|
Mar 31, |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Pro forma net income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income, as reported |
|
$ |
7,010 |
|
|
2,760 |
|
|
Stock-based compensation expense determined
under fair value based method, net of income taxes |
|
|
(299 |
) |
|
(470 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma net income |
|
$ |
6,711 |
|
|
2,290 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per common share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income, as reported |
|
$ |
0.71 |
|
|
0.29 |
|
|
Stock-based compensation expense determined
under fair value based method, net of income taxes |
|
|
(0.03 |
) |
|
(0.05 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma net income |
|
$ |
0.68 |
|
|
0.24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per common share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income, as reported |
|
$ |
0.68 |
|
|
0.29 |
|
|
Stock-based compensation expense determined
under fair value based method, net of income taxes |
|
|
(0.03 |
) |
|
(0.05 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma net income |
|
$ |
0.65 |
|
|
0.24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.
|
Investments
|
|
|
|
Realized investment gains and losses are determined on the basis of specific identification. Declines in the fair value of securities considered to be other than temporary, if any, are recorded as realized losses in the condensed consolidated statements of income. |
|
|
|
Data with respect to bonds and U.S. Government and equity securities, available for sale, are presented in the table below. |
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Proceeds |
|
Gross |
|
Gross |
|
|
|
Amortized
cost of |
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
March 31, 2004 |
|
$ |
199,098 |
|
|
3,398 |
|
|
(596) |
|
As of March 31, 2004 |
|
|
$ |
527,788 |
|
|
|
March 31, 2003 |
|
$ |
136,110 |
|
|
1,056 |
|
|
(1,019) |
|
As of Dec 31, 2003 |
|
|
$ |
522,159 |
|
|
|
Net realized investment gains on all investments for the three months ended March 31, 2004 and 2003 totaled $2,806 and $238, respectively. Included in net realized investment gains for the three months ended March 31, 2004 and 2003 are gains of $4 and $201, respectively on the sale of real estate. |
8
FPIC Insurance Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(In Thousands, Except as Noted)
3. |
Goodwill |
|
|
|
As required by FAS 142 Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, we completed annual impairment testing of our remaining goodwill as of December 31, 2003 and 2002 during the first quarters of 2004 and 2003, respectively, including obtaining updated reports from independent valuation consultants. Based on the results of such testing, we determined that the fair value of our goodwill exceeded its carrying value and, accordingly, no impairment was recognized. |
|
|
|
Reference is made to Notes 2 and 9 to the consolidated financial statements included in our most recently filed Form 10-K, which includes additional information about our accounting for goodwill. |
|
|
4. |
Reinsurance |
|
|
|
The effects of ceded reinsurance on premiums written and earned for the three months ended March 31, 2004 and 2003 are presented in the table below. |
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
|
Mar 31, |
|
Mar 31, |
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
|
|
|
Written |
|
Earned |
|
Written |
|
Earned |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
Direct and
assumed premiums |
|
$ |
98,603 |
|
|
83,780 |
|
|
104,535 |
|
|
85,825 |
|
|
Ceded premiums |
|
|
(54,999 |
) |
|
(48,768 |
) |
|
(65,539 |
) |
|
(56,916 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net premiums |
|
$ |
43,604 |
|
|
35,012 |
|
|
38,996 |
|
|
28,909 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The effects of ceded reinsurance on losses and LAE incurred for the three months ended March 31, 2004 and 2003 are presented in the table below. |
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
Mar 31, |
|
Mar 31, |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Losses and LAE
incurred |
|
$ |
70,630 |
|
|
69,586 |
|
|
Reinsurance
recoverable |
|
|
(41,256 |
) |
|
(42,952 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net losses and
LAE incurred |
|
$ |
29,374 |
|
|
26,634 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We have renewed our excess of loss reinsurance program, effective January 1, 2004. The structure and coverage of such agreements are generally similar to those of our 2003 excess of loss reinsurance program as reported in our most recently filed Form 10-K. Based on analysis of our exposure to extra-contractual obligations and claims in excess of policy limits (ECO/XPL), we have elected not to renew the supplemental awards made ECO/XPL reinsurance that we have carried in addition to the ECO/XPL coverage already included as part of our primary excess of loss reinsurance program. Therefore, this additional layer of excess reinsurance will no longer be in effect after April 1, 2004 and we will self insure this excess risk in the future. |
|
|
|
Reference is made to Note 22 to the consolidated financial statements included in our most recently filed Form 10-K, which includes additional information regarding reinsurance involving related parties. |
9
FPIC Insurance Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(In Thousands, Except as Noted)
5. |
Long Term Debt |
|
|
|
FPICs long term debt includes junior subordinated debentures and senior notes, which are uncollateralized and bear floating interest rates equal to the three-month LIBOR plus spreads ranging from 3.85% to 4.2% (the interest rates ranged from 4.97% to 5.32% as of March 31, 2004). The floating interest rates are adjustable quarterly with changes in the three-month LIBOR, and in the case of the first two offerings, the maximum rate that may be charged under the securities within the first five years is 12.5%. We have also purchased hedging instruments designed to maintain the ultimate floating rate interest cost on all of these securities within a stated range for five years from closing. For additional information on FPICs hedging instruments and interest costs, see the discussion below under Note 6, Derivative Financial Instruments. |
|
|
|
Indenture agreements relating to FPICs junior subordinated debentures and trust preferred securities contain limitations, under certain circumstances, as to (i) the declaration or payment of dividends, or distributions thereon, or the redemption, purchase, acquisition or liquidation with respect to any capital stock of FPIC or its affiliates; (ii) the payment, in certain circumstances, of principal of, premium or interest on, or the repayment, repurchase or redemption of debt securities of FPIC or its affiliates that rank in equal standing with or are junior in interest to the debentures; or (iii) the payment, in certain circumstances, under any guarantees of FPIC or its affiliates that rank equal in standing with, or junior in interest to capital securities guarantees relating to the issuance of the debentures. Circumstances that would result in such limitations include a continuing event of default, as defined by the indenture agreements, a default with respect to payment of any obligations under capital securities guarantees, or a continuing interest deferral election by FPIC. |
|
|
|
Reference is made to Note 13, Long Term Debt, Revolving Credit Facility and Term Loan, to the consolidated financial statements included in our most recently filed Form 10-K, which includes additional information regarding our long term debt. |
|
|
6. |
Derivative Financial Instruments |
|
|
|
As of March 31, 2004, FPIC had four interest rate collars. The collars are designed to maintain FPICs ultimate floating rate interest costs on its junior subordinated debentures and senior notes to within specified interest ranges for five years from the closing date of those liabilities. The initial costs of the hedging instruments acquired for this purpose of $1,134, in aggregate, have been capitalized and will be amortized over their respective five year maturity periods. Reference is made to Note 14, Derivative Financial Instruments, to the consolidated financial statements included in our most recently filed Form 10-K, which includes additional information regarding our interest risk management strategy and the effect of this strategy on FPICs consolidated financial statements. |
|
|
|
The interest rate collars and terms as of March 31, 2004 are presented below with their corresponding effects on the floating rate interest costs associated with the junior subordinated debentures and senior notes. |
|
Notional |
|
Maturity Date |
|
LIBOR |
|
LIBOR |
|
Floor Rate |
|
Cap Rate |
|
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
$ |
15,000 |
|
|
5/15/2008 |
|
|
1.20 |
% |
|
|
4.40 |
% |
|
|
5.30 |
% |
|
|
8.50 |
% |
|
|
$ |
5,000 |
|
|
5/23/2008 |
|
|
1.20 |
% |
|
|
4.40 |
% |
|
|
5.40 |
% |
|
|
8.60 |
% |
|
|
$ |
10,000 |
|
|
5/23/2008 |
|
|
1.20 |
% |
|
|
4.40 |
% |
|
|
5.40 |
% |
|
|
8.60 |
% |
|
|
$ |
15,000 |
|
|
10/29/2008 |
|
|
1.00 |
% |
|
|
4.65 |
% |
|
|
4.85 |
% |
|
|
8.50 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
FPIC Insurance Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(In Thousands, Except as Noted)
7. |
Commitments and Contingencies |
|
|
|
FPICs insurance subsidiaries from time to time become subject to claims for extra-contractual obligations or risks in excess of policy limits in connection with their insurance claims. These claims are sometimes referred to as bad faith actions as it is alleged that the insurance company acted in bad faith in the administration of a claim against an insured. Bad faith actions are infrequent and generally occur in instances where a jury verdict exceeds the insureds policy limits. Under such circumstances, it is routinely alleged that the insurance company failed to negotiate a settlement of a claim in good faith within the insureds policy limit. FPIC has evaluated such exposures as of March 31, 2004, and believes its positions and defenses are meritorious. However, there can be no absolute assurance as to the outcome of such exposures. FPIC currently maintains insurance for such occurrences in the form of a component of its ceded reinsurance, which serves to mitigate exposure to such claims. Such coverage would not apply to future bad faith actions, if any, arising from medical professional liability claims reported prior to 2000. In one current bad faith action arising in 1993, no such coverage is available and an estimate of possible loss above the amount currently reserved cannot be made. In addition, multiple claims for extra contractual obligations or one or more large claims in a single year could result in potential exposure materially in excess of insurance coverage or in increased costs of such insurance coverage. |
|
|
|
FPIC may also become involved in legal actions not involving claims under its insurance policies from time to time. FPIC has evaluated such exposures as of March 31, 2004, and in all cases believes its positions and defenses are meritorious. However, there can be no absolute assurance as to the outcome of such exposures. |
|
|
|
FPICs insurance subsidiaries are subject to assessment by the financial guaranty associations in the states in which they conduct business for the provision of funds necessary for the settlement of covered claims under certain policies of insolvent insurers. Generally, these associations can assess member insurers on the basis of written premiums in their particular states. While management has evaluated the incidents and circumstances surrounding the above-mentioned asserted or unasserted legal claims and assessments of which it is aware and believes that these will not have materially adverse effects on FPIC beyond amounts already recognized and accrued, there can be no absolute assurance as to their ultimate outcomes. |
|
|
|
Management Agreement Between Administrators for the Professions (AFP) and Physicians Reciprocal Insurers (PRI) |
|
|
|
The management agreement between our subsidiary AFP and PRI, the New York insurance reciprocal managed by AFP, was amended to remove the sharing by AFP of 10% of PRIs statutory net income or loss, effective January 1, 2002. With regard to profit sharing amounts already earned and collected, AFP has agreed to hold the years 1999, 2000 and 2001 open for re-determination and possible adjustment for a period of five years each (expiring 2004, 2005 and 2006, respectively.) Such adjustments would be based primarily on development of and related adjustments, if any, to loss and LAE reserves for those years. AFP has earned and collected profit sharing amounts under the original agreement totaling $3,584 for the three years ended December 31, 2001. As of March 31, 2004, and based on PRIs operating results, no amounts were payable under this provision of the amended management agreement. Reference is made to Note 22, Related Party Transactions, to the consolidated financial statements included in our most recently filed Form 10-K for additional information regarding the management agreement with PRI. Also, FPIC has issued an irrevocable letter of credit in the amount of $500,000 as collateral under the operating lease for the building occupied by AFP and PRI in Manhasset, New York. |
11
FPIC Insurance Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(In Thousands, Except as Noted)
8. |
Reconciliation of Basic and Diluted Earnings Per Common Share |
|
|
|
Data with
respect to FPICs basic and diluted earnings per common share are shown
below. |
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
Mar 31, |
|
Mar 31, |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Net income |
|
$ |
7,010 |
|
|
2,760 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
earnings per common share |
|
$ |
0.71 |
|
|
0.29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
earnings per common share |
|
$ |
0.68 |
|
|
0.29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic weighted
average shares outstanding |
|
|
9,878 |
|
|
9,409 |
|
|
Common stock
equivalents |
|
|
453 |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted weighted
average shares outstanding |
|
|
10,331 |
|
|
9,416 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9.
|
Employee Benefit Plans
|
|
|
|
The components of the actuarially computed net periodic pension cost for our two defined benefit plans and supplemental executive retirement plan for the three months ended March 31, 2004 and 2003 are summarized in the table below. |
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
Mar 31, |
|
Mar 31, |
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service cost of
benefits earned during the period |
|
$ |
541 |
|
|
367 |
|
|
|
Interest cost on
projected benefit obligation |
|
|
356 |
|
|
259 |
|
|
|
Expected return
on plan assets |
|
|
(232 |
) |
|
(166 |
) |
|
|
Recognized net
actuarial loss |
|
|
19 |
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
Net amortization
and deferral |
|
|
254 |
|
|
169 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic pension cost |
|
$ |
938 |
|
|
641 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FPIC and its subsidiaries have made contributions totaling $1,728 to its employee post-retirement plans as of March 31, 2004. We currently anticipate contributing an additional $2,303 to our employee post-retirement plans during the remainder of 2004 for total contributions during 2004 of $4,031. |
|
|
|
Reference is made to Note 19, Employee Benefit Plans, to the consolidated financial statements included in our most recently filed Form 10-K, which includes additional information regarding our employee benefit plans. |
12
FPIC Insurance Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(In Thousands, Except as Noted)
10. |
Segment Information |
|
|
|
The accounting policies of FPICs segments are the same as those described in the summary of significant accounting policies found in Note 2, Significant Accounting Policies, to the consolidated financial statements included in our most recently filed Form 10-K. We evaluate a segments performance based on net income or loss and account for intersegment sales and transfers, which are eliminated in the condensed consolidated financial statements, as if the sales or transfers were to a third party. Holding company operations are included within the insurance segment due to its size and prominence and the substantial attention devoted to the segment. Management believes that intersegment revenues associated with transactions between the segments would be reasonably approximate with similar products or services that may have been obtained from or provided to unrelated third parties. All segments are managed separately because each respective business is distinct in terms of markets served, products and services, technology, and required business resources and strategies. |
|
|
|
Selected financial information by segment is summarized in the tables below. |
|
|
|
As of |
|
As of |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
Identifiable Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
Insurance |
|
$ |
1,201,764 |
|
|
1,139,653 |
|
|
|
|
Reciprocal management |
|
|
39,604 |
|
|
39,634 |
|
|
|
|
Third party administration |
|
|
5,812 |
|
|
5,995 |
|
|
|
|
Intersegment eliminations |
|
|
(2,951 |
) |
|
(2,152 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
1,244,229 |
|
|
1,183,130 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
Mar 31, |
|
Mar 31, |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
Total Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
Insurance |
|
$ |
44,285 |
|
|
34,240 |
|
|
|
|
Reciprocal management |
|
|
11,019 |
|
|
7,132 |
|
|
|
|
Third party administration |
|
|
3,980 |
|
|
4,008 |
|
|
|
|
Intersegment eliminations |
|
|
(1,721 |
) |
|
(1,250 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
Total revenues |
|
$ |
57,563 |
|
|
44,130 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Net Income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
Insurance |
|
$ |
4,551 |
|
|
1,291 |
|
|
|
|
Reciprocal management |
|
|
2,443 |
|
|
1,338 |
|
|
|
|
Third party administration |
|
|
16 |
|
|
131 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
7,010 |
|
|
2,760 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
13
FPIC Insurance Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(In Thousands, Except as Noted)
11. |
Related Party Transactions |
|
|
|
Following is a summary of the related party transactions of FPIC and its consolidated subsidiaries included in the condensed consolidated statements of financial position as of March 31, 2004 and December 31, 2003, and the condensed consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income for the three months ended March 31, 2004 and 2003. Credit balances are presented parenthetically. Reference is made to Note 22, Related Party Transactions, to the consolidated financial statements included in our most recently filed Form 10-K, which includes additional information regarding our related party transactions. |
|
Statements of
Financial Position: |
|
As of |
|
As of |
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Other invested assets |
|
$ |
788 |
|
|
788 |
|
|
|
Premiums receivable |
|
$ |
7,994 |
|
|
8,608 |
|
|
|
Reinsurance recoverable on paid losses |
|
$ |
3,678 |
|
|
2,738 |
|
|
|
Reinsurance recoverable on unpaid losses and advance premiums |
|
$ |
12,557 |
|
|
12,012 |
|
|
|
Reinsurance
recoverable on unpaid losses and advance premiums,
fronting arrangements (1) |
|
$ |
77,596 |
|
|
70,462 |
|
|
|
Ceded unearned premiums |
|
$ |
1,679 |
|
|
3,638 |
|
|
|
Ceded unearned premiums, fronting arrangements (2) |
|
$ |
11,606 |
|
|
12,848 |
|
|
|
Deferred policy acquisition costs |
|
$ |
3,448 |
|
|
4,035 |
|
|
|
Deferred policy acquisition costs, fronting arrangements |
|
$ |
(177 |
) |
|
(535 |
) |
|
|
Other assets |
|
$ |
2,699 |
|
|
4,171 |
|
|
|
Liability for losses and LAE |
|
$ |
(21,500 |
) |
|
(20,555 |
) |
|
|
Unearned premiums |
|
$ |
(45,492 |
) |
|
(47,240 |
) |
|
|
Reinsurance payable |
|
$ |
920 |
|
|
(23 |
) |
|
|
Reinsurance payable, fronting arrangements |
|
$ |
(13,814 |
) |
|
(11,738 |
) |
|
|
Deferred credit |
|
$ |
(7,493 |
) |
|
(7,729 |
) |
|
|
Accrued expenses and other liabilities |
|
$ |
(920 |
) |
|
(1,030 |
) |
|
(1) |
Corresponding direct liability for losses and LAE to unrelated parties under fronting arrangements were ($78,801) and ($71,620) as of March 31, 2004 and December 31, 2003, respectively. |
|
|
|
|
(2) |
Corresponding direct unearned premiums from unrelated parties under fronting arrangements were ($11,606) and ($12,848) as of March 31, 2004 and December 31, 2003, respectively. |
14
FPIC Insurance Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(In Thousands, Except as Noted)
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
Mar 31, |
|
Mar 31, |
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Statements of Income and
Comphrehensive Income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net premiums earned |
|
$ |
(583 |
) |
|
(542 |
) |
|
|
Net premiums earned, fronting arrangements (1) |
|
$ |
10,504 |
|
|
12,256 |
|
|
|
Claims administration and management fees |
|
$ |
(8,465 |
) |
|
(4,988 |
) |
|
|
Finance charge and other income |
|
$ |
|
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
Net losses and LAE |
|
$ |
(540 |
) |
|
(249 |
) |
|
|
Net losses and LAE, fronting arrangements (2) |
|
$ |
(11,745 |
) |
|
(9,272 |
) |
|
|
Other underwriting expenses |
|
$ |
82 |
|
|
1,032 |
|
|
|
Other underwriting expenses, fronting arrangements |
|
$ |
(1,665 |
) |
|
(1,661 |
) |
|
|
Other expenses |
|
$ |
53 |
|
|
53 |
|
|
(1) |
Corresponding direct premiums earned from unrelated parties under fronting arrangements were ($10,500) and ($12,253) for the three months ended March 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively. |
|
|
|
|
(2) |
Corresponding direct losses and LAE incurred to unrelated parties under fronting arrangements were $11,865 and $9,272 for the three months ended March 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively. |
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2003, the management agreement with APA Management, Inc. and the Consulting Group of APA, Inc. consulting agreement had expired. Included in our 2003 results are expenses incurred with regard to these agreements that did not occur during the three months ended March 31, 2004. |
|
|
|
|
|
During October 2003 we sold our 20% investment in APS Insurance Services, Inc. (APS) to the majority shareholder. APS serves as the exclusive management company for American Physicians Insurance Exchange (APIE), a Texas medical professional liability insurance exchange, with which we had also engaged in a fronting program. The fronting program with APIE expired December 31, 2002, at which time we ceased writing business for APIE on our policy forms and placed the existing business in run-off. |
|
|
|
|
12. |
New Accounting Pronouncements |
|
|
|
|
|
FAS 132 (revised 2003), Employers Disclosures about Pensions and Other Postretirement Benefits an amendment of FASB Statements No. 87, 88, and 106 revises employers disclosures about pension plans and other postretirement benefit plans. The statement does not change the measurement or recognition of those plans required by FAS 87, Employers Accounting for Pensions, FAS 88, Employers Accounting for Settlements and Curtailments of Defined Benefit Pension Plans and for Termination Benefits, and FAS 106, Employers Accounting for Postretirement Benefits Other Than Pensions. FAS 132 (revised 2003) retains the disclosure requirements contained in FAS 132, Employers Disclosures about Pensions and Other Postretirement Benefits, which it replaces. It requires additional disclosures to those in the original FAS 132 about the assets, obligations, cash flows, and net periodic benefit cost of defined benefit pension plans and other defined benefit postretirement plans. The required information should be provided separately for pension plans and for other postretirement benefit plans. The interim-period disclosures required by FAS 132 (revised 2003) are effective for interim periods beginning after December 15, 2003. |
15
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis (MD&A) of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
For purposes of this management discussion and analysis, the term FPIC refers to FPIC Insurance Group, Inc. and subsidiaries. The following discussion and analysis of financial condition, results of operations, liquidity and capital resources and other matters should be read in conjunction with the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements for the three months ended March 31, 2004, included in Part I, Item 1, as well as the audited, consolidated financial statements and notes included in FPICs Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003, which was filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) on March 15, 2004.
Safe Harbor Disclosure
The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 provides a safe harbor for forward-looking statements. Any written or oral statements made by or on behalf of FPIC may include forward-looking statements, which reflect our current views with respect to future events and financial performance. These forward-looking statements are subject to certain uncertainties and other factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from such statements. These uncertainties and other factors include, but are not limited to:
i) |
Risks factors, including the effect on reserves and underwriting results, associated with changing market conditions that result from fluctuating cyclical patterns of property and casualty insurance business; |
|
|
ii) |
The uncertainties of the loss reserving process; |
|
|
iii) |
The occurrence of insured or reinsured events with a frequency or severity exceeding our estimates; |
|
|
iv) |
The impact of surplus constraints on growth; |
|
|
v) |
The competitive environment in which FPIC operates, including reliance on independent agents to place insurance, physicians electing to practice without insurance coverage, related trends and associated pricing pressures and developments; |
|
|
vi) |
The actual amount of new and renewal business; |
|
|
vii) |
Business risks that result from FPICs size and geographic concentration; |
|
|
viii) |
Developments in reinsurance markets that could affect our reinsurance programs; |
|
|
ix) |
The ability to collect reinsurance recoverables; |
|
|
x) |
The dependence of our reciprocal management segment upon a single major customer, Physicians Reciprocal Insurers (PRI), for the preponderance of its revenue and consequently, the effect of rates and claims experience on PRIs ability to maintain or grow its premium base; |
|
|
xi) |
Developments in global financial markets that could affect our investment portfolio and financing plans; |
|
|
xii) |
Risk factors associated with the impact of rising interest rates on the market value of FPICs investments; |
|
|
xiii) |
Risks factors associated with the impact of rising interest rates on FPICs interest costs associated with its long term debt; |
|
|
xiv) |
Adverse changes in securities markets; |
|
|
xv) |
Rates, including rates on excess policies, being subject to or mandated by legal requirements and regulatory approval, which could affect our business or reinsurance arrangements; |
|
|
xvi) |
Uncertainties relating to government and regulatory policies (such as subjecting FPIC to insurance regulation or taxation in additional jurisdictions or amending, revoking or enacting any laws, regulations or treaties affecting our current operations); |
|
|
xvii) |
Legal developments, including claims for extra-contractual obligations or in excess of policy limits in connection with the administration of insurance claims; |
16
xviii) |
Business and financial risks associated with the unpredictability of court decisions; |
|
|
xix) |
The loss of the services of any of our executive officers; |
|
|
xx) |
Risks of impairment of assets, generally, including the risk of impairment or inability to continue to recognize deferred acquisition costs, deferred tax assets, goodwill and other deferred or intangible assets; |
|
|
xxi) |
General economic conditions, either nationally or in our market areas, that are worse than expected; |
|
|
xxii) |
Changes in our financial ratings resulting from one or more of these uncertainties or other factors and the potential impact on our agents ability to place insurance business on behalf of FPIC; and |
|
|
|
other risk factors discussed elsewhere in FPICs Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003, filed with the SEC on March 15, 2004. |
The words believe, anticipate, foresee, estimate, project, plan, expect, intend, hope, should, will, will likely result or will continue and variations thereof or similar expressions identify forward-looking statements. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of their dates. FPIC undertakes no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as required by law.
Critical Accounting Policies
Our discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations are based upon the condensed consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP). The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues, expenses and related disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities. On an on-going basis, we evaluate our estimates, including those related to income taxes, loss and loss adjustment expense (LAE) reserves and related reinsurance assets, contingencies and litigation, and the carrying amount of certain assets for which estimates of their values are required. We generally base our estimates on historical experience or other appropriate assumptions that we believe are reasonable and relevant under the circumstances. Of necessity, such evaluations may be less in scope for purposes of preparing interim financial statements; for example, we do not perform a complete reserve study every quarter, and instead, rely on other analytical procedures. The results of these estimation processes form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.
We believe the following critical accounting policies, which are described more fully below and in the corresponding MD&A section and Note 2, Significant Accounting Policies, to the consolidated financial statements included in our most recently filed annual report on Form 10-K, affect our more significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of the condensed consolidated financial statements. In addition to these critical accounting policies that may affect our estimates, the following matters regarding our management and other agreements with PRI and its status as a major client of ours are also pertinent risk considerations when reviewing these interim condensed consolidated financial statements.
17
Liability for Losses and LAE
Our liability for losses and LAE (also referred to as our loss and LAE reserves) is the largest liability of FPIC and the most sensitive financial statement item to estimation and judgment. Medical professional liability (MPL) insurance, including business written directly and reinsurance assumed, is our primary line of business and accounted for $562.7 million and $549.8 million, or 96%, of our total consolidated liability for losses and LAE as of March 31, 2004 and December 31, 2003, respectively. The remainder of our reserves represent other smaller lines and products.
The primary factors affecting our estimates of how much we will pay and therefore reserve for insurance claims, defense costs and other related costs are:
|
|
Frequency and severity trends (numbers of claims and how much we will pay for each claim on average for one or more periods); |
|
|
|
|
|
Frequency of claims closed with indemnity payments (the percentage of claims received that ultimately result in a loss payment versus those that are settled and closed without a loss payment); |
|
|
|
|
|
The timing or pattern of future payments; |
|
|
|
|
|
The amount of defense cost we will pay for each claim or group of claims; and |
|
|
|
|
|
Inflationary trends that are expected to bear on future loss and LAE payments. |
These factors, in turn, can be affected by the judicial environment and tort-related trends over time. It is also important to note that one or more of the actuarial methods used by us do not rely on specific assumptions for these factors; rather, these assumptions are developed as a by-product of the application of the methods, which may then be monitored and factored into the final judgmental considerations of the selection of the point estimate and range of reasonable values around the point estimate from among the methods. All of the above-mentioned factors individually can and will generally vary from one period to the next over time but are estimated to approximate their ultimate values in setting reserve estimates.
In addition, due to the relatively small number of claims and the average cost per claim, any change in the trends assumed in the ultimate values for these factors may be expected to result in a significant change in the reserve estimates. Because our aggregate loss and LAE reserves are so large, this also means that virtually any change in the level of our carried reserves will be material to results of operations and may be material to our financial position. As an example, a 1% increase or decrease in carried reserves, net of reinsurance, as of March 31, 2004, would result in an after-tax addition or reduction in reported net income of $1.8 million, or 26% of our consolidated net income for the three months ended March 31, 2004. A typical range of reasonable values for MPL reserve estimates is considered to be as wide as 15%; thus, our results of operations and financial position are very sensitive to our reserve estimates and judgments, in addition to the performance of the business itself.
Reinsurance
Reinsurance does not relieve us from our primary obligations to policyholders. Therefore, the failure of reinsurers to honor their obligations could result in losses to us. The amounts recoverable from reinsurers on our unpaid losses and LAE are calculated by applying the terms of the respective ceded reinsurance contracts to our estimates of the underlying loss and LAE reserves that are subject to reinsurance. Thus, to the extent that our reinsured reserves change or are adjusted, so will the related reinsurance recoverable amounts and our exposure.
18
We evaluate the financial condition of our reinsurers and monitor concentrations of credit risk with respect to the individual reinsurers that participate in our ceded programs to minimize our exposure to significant losses from reinsurer insolvencies. We hold collateral in the form of letters of credit or trust accounts for amounts recoverable from reinsurers that are not designated as authorized reinsurers by the applicable departments of insurance of the states that have jurisdiction over the underlying business.
Income Taxes
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are estimated and recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to temporary differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases and operating loss and tax credit carry forwards.
A valuation allowance against deferred tax assets is estimated and recorded if it is more likely than not that all or some portion of the benefits related to the deferred tax assets will not be realized. Valuation allowances are based on estimates of taxable income and the period over which deferred tax assets will be recoverable. We estimate and believe it is more likely than not that our deferred tax assets will be fully realized. In the event that actual results differ from our estimates, or those estimates are adjusted in future periods, we may need to establish a valuation allowance, which would impact our financial position and results of operations.
Goodwill and Intangible Assets
Effective January 1, 2002, we adopted Financial Accounting Standard No. (FAS) 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets. Under FAS 142, goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets are no longer amortized through charges to income, but continue to be subject to annual (or under certain circumstances more frequent) impairment testing based on estimated fair values.
We have obtained independent appraisals annually since the adoption of FAS 142, the most recent of which was performed as of December 31, 2003, which indicates that our goodwill and other intangible assets are fully recoverable. Our remaining goodwill and intangible assets of $19.6 million will continue to be subject to impairment testing through independent appraisal or otherwise at least annually, and potentially more often should a triggering event occur. A triggering event under FAS 142 might include such things as a significant adverse change in legal factors or business climate, an adverse action or assessment by a regulator, unanticipated competition, or a loss of key personnel.
Investments
Our invested assets comprise our largest single asset class and consist mostly of investment securities in the form of fixed income investments in bonds and notes. Our fixed income investment securities are carried at their market values and accounted for $539.0 million and $528.6 million or 85% of our total cash and invested assets, and 43% and 45% of our total assets, respectively as of March 31, 2004 and December 31, 2003, respectively. Unrealized gains or losses in their market values are recorded directly in shareholders equity, net of tax effects, as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income.
There is an exception to the treatment noted above if and when an investment security considered to be available for sale is deemed to be other-than-temporarily impaired. An other than temporary impairment may occur when the market value of a security falls below its cost by a material amount for an extended period of time (generally one year but can be less under certain circumstances) or when other creditworthiness issues arise with regard to an issuer. If and when a security is deemed to be other than temporarily impaired it is written down to its estimated market value with a corresponding realized investment loss recognized in net income.
19
Commitments and Contingencies
Liabilities for loss contingencies arising from claims, assessments, litigation, fines and penalties and other sources are recorded when it is probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of the assessment and/or remediation can be reasonably estimated.
Our insurance subsidiaries are also subject to assessment by the financial guaranty associations in the states in which they conduct business for the provision of funds necessary for the settlement of covered claims under certain policies of insolvent insurers. Generally, these associations can assess member insurers on the basis of written premiums in their particular states. In addition to standard assessments, the Florida and Missouri legislatures may also levy special assessments to settle claims caused by certain catastrophic losses, such as a hurricane. We would be assessed on the basis of premiums written. No special assessments have been made in 2004 or 2003.
Revenue Recognition
Premium income, which is our main source of revenue, is generally recognized pro-rata over the respective period of each policy. Premium receivables are recorded net of an estimated allowance for uncollectible amounts.
See the following MD&A section for additional considerations regarding our reciprocal management segment and business with PRI.
Business with PRI
Reciprocal Management Agreement
Administrators for the Professions, Inc. (AFP) has a 10-year management agreement with PRI, under which it receives a management fee annually equal to 13% of PRIs direct premiums written. The current term of the management agreement runs through December 31, 2008. Under the terms of the management agreement, AFP receives this fee in exchange for performing services necessary to conduct and manage the entire operation of PRI. Such services include all or substantially all marketing, underwriting, policy issuance, policy administration, investment management, claims handling and general and administrative functions, including human resources, accounting, financial reporting, and others, on an on-going basis over the life of the agreement. AFP is also reimbursed by PRI for certain expenses paid on PRIs behalf. The expenses reimbursed by PRI are principally salaries and related payroll expenses, and overhead costs associated with claims, legal and risk management course personnel employed by AFP who work on PRI business.
The management fees are estimated, billed and collected on a monthly basis. Our entitlement to such fees is ultimately based upon the provision of all of the services necessary to manage PRI over the term of the contract. Revenues are estimated and recognized as earned ratably over the year, which generally corresponds with when they are billed as this accounting treatment reasonably approximates and accomplishes a recognition pattern that corresponds with the provision of the required services during the quarters and the year. The fees estimated and billed, which are recognized in income, are reduced by an estimated provision for return premiums.
See the MD&A section, Contractual Obligations, Commitments and Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements included in our most recently filed annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003 for a discussion and analysis of an additional commitment and related contingent liability assumed by AFP as a result of an amendment to its management agreement with PRI, effective January 1, 2002.
20
AFP also has two subsidiaries, FPIC Intermediaries, Inc. (FPIC Intermediaries) and Group Data Corporation (Group Data). FPIC Intermediaries acts as a reinsurance co-broker and intermediary for PRI and our insurance subsidiaries. Group Data acts as a co-agent and co-broker for our internal insurance needs and for the purchase of structured settlements from time to time for settled MPL claims for PRI. The reciprocal management segment also includes FPICs 80% owned subsidiary Professional Medical Administrators, LLC (PMA), which acts as co-broker, intermediary and manager of reinsurance programs for PRIs program business in Pennsylvania, whereby PRI assumes the premiums and risks insured. PRI also owns 10% of PMA and until August 2003, our subsidiary, First Professionals Insurance Company, Inc. (First Professionals) acted as the fronting carrier for PRI for the program business managed on its behalf by PMA. Since then, PRI has used an outside carrier to act as its fronting carrier.
The financial results for these business arrangements make up our reciprocal management segment and are presented and discussed in the following applicable section of this MD&A. Additional financial information and disclosures about our reciprocal management segment and business can be found in Note 1, Organization and Nature of Operations, Note 16, Commitments and Contingencies, Note 20, Segment Information, and Note 22, Related Party Transactions, to our consolidated financial statements included in our most recently filed annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003.
Reinsurance with PRI
Our insurance subsidiary, First Professionals, assumes reinsurance from PRI. As discussed above, program business assumed by PRI in Pennsylvania was written on First Professionals policy forms, as fronting carrier, through July 31, 2003. Effective August 1, 2003, PRI engaged an unrelated fronting carrier for this business and, with the exception of tail coverage, no new or renewal business is being written on First Professionals policy forms.
The assumed reinsurance and fronting fees on PRI business of First Professionals are included in the Insurance Segment and are also discussed further in the applicable sections of the MD&A and in Note 22, Related Party Transactions, to our consolidated financial statements included in our most recently filed annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003.
PRI is a Major Client of Ours
In addition to their contributions to our results of operations, our agreements and business arrangements with PRI as a major client of ours also means that our revenues and results of operations are financially sensitive to its revenues and financial condition. We do not own PRI, or have a controlling financial interest in PRI, nor is PRI considered a variable interest entity under FASB Interpretation No. 46R, Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities (as Revised), and so PRIs financial statements are not consolidated or included in ours. Instead, PRI is similar to a mutual insurer and the risks and rewards of ownership vest with the policyholders of PRI.
PRI and our subsidiary, AFP, are regulated by the New York State Insurance Department (the NYSID). PRI files its annual and quarterly statements with the NYSID containing its statutory-basis financial statements and other data. AFP and PRI are required to file audits of their financial statements annually with the NYSID obtained from the same qualified independent auditing firm.
21
PRI, as an MPL insurer, is subject to many of the same types of risks as those of our insurance subsidiaries and MPL companies generally. These risks include, but are not limited to, rate adequacy, adverse loss experience, and the effects of changes in market interest rates that it can earn on invested assets. PRI files information with regard to its rates annually with the NYSID. PRI implemented an 8.5% rate increase effective July 1, 2003 following several years of level rates. Growth at PRI is also subject to surplus constraints; however, as a reciprocal, PRI is able to operate with lower surplus and at higher leverage ratios than non-reciprocals such as our insurance subsidiaries. PRIs policyholders surplus exceeds the minimum amount required under New York insurance laws and regulations. New York insurance laws and regulations do not impose risk-adjusted capital requirements on PRI. Further, as allowed under New York insurance laws, PRI has requested and received permission from the NYSID to follow the permitted practice of discounting its loss and LAE reserves.
The NYSID mandates the insurance rates PRI and other New York MPL carriers are allowed to charge their policyholders. These include the rates charged for policies in excess of $1.3 million and for covered extended reporting endorsements for death, disability and retirement, which have been reinsured to First Professionals. Under New York insurance statutes, the NYSID is also authorized to surcharge PRIs policyholders in the event it is determined that PRIs rates were deficient in one or more prior years as a result of adverse loss development. The amount of the surcharge may be up to 8% of PRIs policyholders premiums annually until such deficiency is recovered.
Despite the unique aspects of the business and regulatory environments in which PRI operates, as an MPL insurer, it is still subject to many of the same types of risks as those of other MPL and property-casualty insurers, including similar risks to many of those described under Safe Harbor Disclosure.
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Results of Operations: Three Months Ended March 31, 2004 Compared to Three Months Ended March 31, 2003
Overview
Net income for the three months ended March 31, 2004 was $7.0 million, or $0.68 per diluted share, an increase of 154% and 134%, respectively, when compared with net income of $2.8 million, or $0.29 per diluted share, for the three months ended March 31, 2003. Our insurance and reciprocal management segments both reported higher net income when compared with the same period in the prior year.
Total revenues for the three months ended March 31, 2004 increased $13.5 million to $57.6 million from $44.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2003. The increase in total revenues is the result of higher premiums earned and higher claims administration and management fees. Net investment income increased as our fixed income securities portfolio has grown significantly in 2003 and in recent years with the growth in our insurance business. Net realized investment gains also increased.
Total expenses for the three months ended March 31, 2004 increased $5.8 million to $45.8 million from $40.0 million for the three months ended March 31, 2003. However, increases in expenses were lower than increases in revenues primarily resulting from improved underwriting and operating results in the insurance segment. Our GAAP underwriting (combined) ratio improved from 101% for the three months ended March 31, 2003 to 94% for the three months ended March 31, 2004. Claims administration and management expenses at our reciprocal management segment increased as a result of growth in business at that segment. Interest expense declined due to lower total borrowing costs (interest plus the costs of related hedging instruments) on our long term debt. Income tax expense was higher due to higher taxable income and, to a smaller extent, a provision made in the first quarter of 2004 for possible income tax contingencies.
22
Insurance Segment
The insurance segment is made up of our four insurance subsidiaries, First
Professionals, Anesthesiologists Professional Assurance Company (APAC) and The Tenere Group, Inc. companies of Intermed Insurance
Company (Intermed) and Interlex Insurance Company (Interlex). Holding company operations are also included
in the insurance segment due to its size and prominence and the substantial
attention devoted to the segment. Unaudited financial and selected other data for our insurance segment for the three
months ended March 31, 2004 and 2003 is summarized in the table below. Dollar amounts are in thousands.
Insurance Segment Results and Selected Other Information
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
|
Mar 31, |
|
Percentage |
|
Mar 31, |
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Direct and assumed
premiums written
|
|
$ |
98,603 |
|
-6 |
% |
|
$ |
104,535 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Net premiums written |
|
$ |
43,604 |
|
12 |
% |
|
$ |
38,996 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Net premiums earned |
|
$ |
35,012 |
|
21 |
% |
|
$ |
28,909 |
|
||
Net investment income |
|
|
5,586 |
|
25 |
% |
|
|
4,466 |
|
||
Net realized investment
gains |
|
|
2,806 |
|
1079 |
% |
|
|
238 |
|
||
Finance charges and other
income |
|
|
170 |
|
-19 |
% |
|
|
209 |
|
||
Intersegment revenues |
|
|
711 |
|
70 |
% |
|
|
418 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Total revenues |
|
|
44,285 |
|
29 |
% |
|
|
34,240 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Net losses and LAE |
|
|
29,374 |
|
10 |
% |
|
|
26,634 |
|
||
Other underwriting expense |
|
|
3,503 |
|
40 |
% |
|
|
2,504 |
|
||
Interest expense |
|
|
590 |
|
-49 |
% |
|
|
1,163 |
|
||
Other expenses |
|
|
1,787 |
|
42 |
% |
|
|
1,258 |
|
||
Intersegment expenses |
|
|
998 |
|
22 |
% |
|
|
820 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Total expenses |
|
|
36,252 |
|
12 |
% |
|
|
32,379 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Income from operations before
income taxes |
|
|
8,033 |
|
332 |
% |
|
|
1,861 |
|
||
|
Less: Income tax expense |
|
|
3,482 |
|
511 |
% |
|
|
570 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Net income |
|
$ |
4,551 |
|
253 |
% |
|
$ |
1,291 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Selected Direct
Professional Liability Claims Information |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Net paid losses and LAE on
professional liability claims |
|
$ |
31,939 |
|
35 |
% |
|
$ |
23,611 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Average net paid loss per
professional liability claim with indemnity payment |
|
$ |
217 |
|
34 |
% |
|
$ |
162 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Total professional
liability claims and incidents reported during the period |
|
|
543 |
|
-34 |
% |
|
|
827 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Total professional
liability claims with indemnity payment |
|
|
101 |
|
46 |
% |
|
|
69 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Total professional
liability claims and incidents closed without indemnity payment |
|
|
492 |
|
43 |
% |
|
|
343 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Selected Policyholder
Counts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Professional liability policyholders (Excludes policyholders under professional liability fronting arrangements of 847 and 3,887, respectively) |
|
|
13,742 |
|
-14 |
% |
|
|
15,969 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Insurance segment net income increased significantly during the quarter ended March 31, 2004, primarily due to an increase in net premiums earned and net investment income and lower interest expense on long term debt. Net realized investment gains were also higher in the quarter ended March 31, 2004.
23
Our insurance segment results include the effects of our net account quota share agreement with the Hannover Re companies. As a result of this agreement, net premiums earned, net losses and LAE incurred and other underwriting expenses were reduced by amounts ceded under the agreement of $21.4 million, $16.8 million and $5.9 million, respectively, for the quarter ended March 31, 2004. For the quarter ended March 31, 2003, net premiums earned, net losses and LAE incurred and other underwriting expenses were reduced by $24.6 million, $19.9 million and $6.5 million, respectively, as a result of the agreement. Before the amounts ceded under the Hannover Re agreement, net premiums earned, net losses and LAE incurred and other underwriting expenses were $56.4 million, $46.2 million and $9.4 million, respectively, for the quarter ended March 31, 2004 and $53.5 million, $46.5 million and $9.0 million, respectively, for the quarter ended March 31, 2003.
As a result of the Hannover Re agreement, our net underwriting margin (defined as net premiums earned less net losses and LAE and other underwriting expenses) improved by $1.3 million and $1.8 million for the quarters ended March 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively. Insurance segment net income as a result of the Hannover Re agreement decreased by $0.2 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2004 and increased by $0.6 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2003. The effects of the Hannover Re agreement to the insurance segments net income included finance charges associated with funds withheld under the agreement of $1.6 million and $0.8 million for the quarters ended March 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively. These finance charges are included in other expenses.
Net premiums earned before the Hannover Re agreement increased $2.9 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2004 when compared with the same period in 2003. The increase is primarily the result of pricing improvements. First Professionals, APAC and Intermed have implemented significant rate increases during each of the previous three years. The increases resulting from pricing improvements were offset to some degree by decreases in the number of policyholders in non-core states and in Missouri as insurance capacity is freed up for First Professionals core MPL business in Florida. The policyholder reduction in Missouri was expected as a result of a very large rate increase implemented in 2003.
Our investment revenues, net investment income and net realized investment gains, all increased for the quarter ended March 31, 2004. Net investment income increased primarily as a result of the increase in our fixed income investment portfolio, which continues to grow with the corresponding increases in our insurance business. Net realized investment gains increased as we took advantage of market and economic conditions and liquidated securities with investment gains with a view toward re-positioning our portfolio in accordance with our overall investment objectives and strategy. Unrealized investment gains and losses were $12,797 and $1,582, respectively, as of March 31, 2004.
Net losses and LAE incurred before the Hannover Re agreement decreased $0.3 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2004 when compared with the same period in 2003. Our net loss ratio (defined as the ratio of net losses and LAE incurred to net premiums earned) before the Hannover Re agreement for the quarters ended March 31, 2004 and 2003 were 82% and 87%, respectively. The decrease in our net losses and LAE and corresponding loss ratio reflects the pricing improvements in our insurance business, taking into consideration the inherent lag between the time premiums are written and when they are subsequently earned and the related losses are incurred, and including appropriately conservative assumptions for expected loss trends.
24
The increases in net paid losses and LAE, average net paid losses and LAE, and professional liability claims closed with indemnity payments are all generally consistent and expected as a result of recent growth in our insurance business, considering the inherent time lag until the related claims are settled and closed. The average net paid loss amount for the three months ended March 31, 2004 was significantly higher than the comparable average for the three months ended March 31, 2003; however the average net paid loss amount for the first quarter of 2003 was also relatively low in comparison with other recent quarters. The average net paid loss amount for the first quarter of 2004 was lower than the amount reported for the fourth quarter of 2003. Newly reported claims and incidents were down significantly in the first quarter of 2004 when compared with the first quarter of 2003. This was expected following a speed up in claims reporting as plaintiffs attorneys accelerated case filings to precede the effective date of tort reform legislation passed in Florida last fall. In addition, we have reduced our total policy counts as a result of confining our growth in policyholders to Florida while reducing our exposure in or exiting certain other states. Overall, our claims experience in the first quarter of 2004 was consistent and in line with the assumptions currently reflected in our loss and LAE reserve estimates.
25
Reciprocal
Management Segment
Our reciprocal management segment is made up of AFP, our New York subsidiary,
and its two wholly owned subsidiaries, FPIC Intermediaries and Group Data. AFP acts as administrator
and attorney-in-fact for PRI, the second largest medical professional liability
insurer for physicians in the state of New York. FPIC Intermediaries acts as a reinsurance broker and intermediary
in the placement of reinsurance for PRI and FPIC. Group Data acts as a broker in the placement of
annuities for structured settlements.
The segment also includes the business of PMA, an 80% owned
subsidiary. PMA provides brokerage and
administration services to PRI for professional liability insurance
programs. Unaudited financial
and selected other data for the reciprocal management segment for the three
months ended March 31, 2004 and 2003 is summarized in the table below. Dollar amounts are in thousands.
Reciprocal Management Segment Results and Selected Other Information
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
|
Mar 31, |
|
Percentage |
|
Mar 31, |
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Claims administration and
management fees |
|
$ |
8,465 |
|
70 |
% |
|
$ |
4,988 |
|
||
Net investment income |
|
|
28 |
|
-15 |
% |
|
|
33 |
|
||
Commission income |
|
|
1,489 |
|
18 |
% |
|
|
1,267 |
|
||
Other income |
|
|
27 |
|
29 |
% |
|
|
21 |
|
||
Intersegment revenues |
|
|
1,010 |
|
23 |
% |
|
|
823 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Total revenues |
|
|
11,019 |
|
55 |
% |
|
|
7,132 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Claims administration and
management expenses |
|
|
6,716 |
|
45 |
% |
|
|
4,625 |
|
||
Other expenses |
|
|
54 |
|
2 |
% |
|
|
53 |
|
||
Intersegment expenses |
|
|
571 |
|
62 |
% |
|
|
352 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Total expenses |
|
|
7,341 |
|
46 |
% |
|
|
5,030 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Income from operations
before income taxes |
|
|
3,678 |
|
75 |
% |
|
|
2,102 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Less: Income taxes |
|
|
1,235 |
|
62 |
% |
|
|
764 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Net income |
|
$ |
2,443 |
|
83 |
% |
|
$ |
1,338 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Selected Information
Regarding Management of PRI |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Reciprocal premiums
written under management |
|
$ |
83,599 |
|
173 |
% |
|
$ |
30,646 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
As of |
|
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
|
Mar 31, |
|
Percentage |
|
Mar 31, |
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Reciprocal statutory
assets under management |
|
$ |
921,338 |
|
13 |
% |
|
$ |
815,404 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Professional liability
policyholders under management |
|
|
11,237 |
|
6 |
% |
|
|
10,642 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reciprocal management net income increased during the quarter ended March 31, 2004, primarily due to higher management fees and commission income. The growth in these revenues was the result of growth in premiums written at PRI due to a newly acquired institutional client and higher insurance premiums placed by PMA under a PRI professional liability insurance program.
26
Claims administration and management fees earned by AFP are comprised entirely of management fees from PRI. In accordance with the management agreement between AFP and PRI, AFP receives a management fee equal to 13% of PRIs direct premiums written, with an adjustment for expected return premiums. As such, increases in the direct premiums written by PRI result in a corresponding increase in management fees earned by AFP. The addition of a new institutional client is expected to add approximately $49.5 million to PRI s 2004 annual written premiums resulting in an increase in the management fees earned for the first quarter and also increasing the fees that will be earned in subsequent quarters of 2004 as services are provided.
Commission income earned by the reciprocal management segment increased for the quarter ended March 31, 2004 primarily as a result of an increase in insurance premiums placed by PMA under a PRI professional liability insurance program, where commissions are received based on the amount of insurance premium placed. This increase in commission income was slightly offset by lower brokerage commissions earned by Intermediaries from third party reinsurers as a result of the decrease in the placement of reinsurance premiums for our insurance.
The increase in claims administration and management expenses for the quarter ended March 31, 2004 when compared with the same quarter in 2003 is due to the combination of an increase in operating expenses at AFP and commission expenses at PMA. The increase in operating expenses at AFP is the result of corresponding growth of PRI. The increase in commission expenses at PMA was associated with an increase in premiums written and placed under a PRI professional liability insurance program.
27
Third Party
Administration (TPA) Segment
Our TPA segment represents the business of our subsidiary, Employers Mutual,
Inc. (EMI). Unaudited financial and selected other data for our TPA
segment for the three months ended March 31, 2004 and 2003 is summarized in the
table below. Dollar amounts are in
thousands.
TPA Segment Results and Selected Other Information
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|
||||||||
|
|
Mar 31, |
|
Percentage |
|
Mar 31, |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Claims administration and
management fees
|
|
$ |
3,619 |
|
-2 |
% |
|
$ |
3,677 |
|
|
Net investment income |
|
|
7 |
|
75 |
% |
|
|
4 |
|
|
Commission income |
|
|
354 |
|
12 |
% |
|
|
317 |
|
|
Other income |
|
|
|
|
-100 |
% |
|
|
1 |
|
|
Intersegment revenues |
|
|
|
|
-100 |
% |
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
3,980 |
|
-1 |
% |
|
|
4,008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Claims administration and
management expenses |
|
|
3,797 |
|
2 |
% |
|
|
3,717 |
|
|
Intersegment expenses |
|
|
152 |
|
95 |
% |
|
|
78 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expenses |
|
|
3,949 |
|
4 |
% |
|
|
3,795 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations
before income taxes |
|
|
31 |
|
-85 |
% |
|
|
213 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Income tax expense |
|
|
15 |
|
-82 |
% |
|
|
82 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
16 |
|
-88 |
% |
|
$ |
131 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of |
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|
||||||||
|
|
Mar 31, |
|
Percentage |
|
Mar 31, |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Selected TPA Segment
Customer Data |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Covered lives under
employee benefit programs |
|
|
99,665 |
|
-10 |
% |
|
|
111,301 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Covered lives under
workers compensation programs |
|
|
42,400 |
|
11 |
% |
|
|
38,100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TPA net income decreased during the quarter ended March 31, 2004 primarily due to small decreases in claims administration and management fee revenue, related margins and higher intersegment expenses when compared with the same period in 2003. Operating margins decreased somewhat during the first three months of 2004, when compared with the first three months of 2003, as a result of higher operating expenses associated with a strategic growth initiative. The net decline in revenues for the three months ended March 31, 2004 as compared to the first quarter of 2003 was due to a reduction in covered lives associated with employee benefit programs under management.
28
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Position: March 31, 2004 Compared to December 31, 2003
Cash and invested assets increased $9.8 million to $632.5 million as of March 31, 2004 from $622.7 million as of December 31, 2003. The increase in cash and invested assets is primarily due to an increase in the aggregate market value of our fixed income investments, growth in premiums at our insurance segment and growth in claims administration and management fees and commission income at our reciprocal management segment. Also contributing to the increase was cash received from the exercise of stock options and resulting issuance of our common stock. Offsetting these increases were higher paid claims in the quarter, including some for which corresponding reinsurance recoveries have not yet been received as of March 31, 2004.
Insurance assets, including premiums receivable and reinsurance recoverables and related assets, all increased as of March 31, 2004 primarily as the result of growth experienced in our insurance premiums. Recoverables on paid losses increased due to an increase in paid losses for which the corresponding recoveries were not yet received as of March 31, 2004. Approximately $12.8 million of the increase due from reinsurers on unpaid losses is attributable to loss and LAE reserves ceded under the Hannover Re agreement during the first three months of 2004.
The increases in our insurance liabilities as of March 31, 2004, including the liability for losses and LAE, unearned premiums and reinsurance payable, are attributable to recent growth in our core MPL insurance business. Reinsurance payable increased $18.2 million as a result of business ceded under the Hannover Re agreement, which was partially offset by the payment of premiums due under FPICs primary reinsurance agreement.
As more fully discussed in the preceding MD&A section on Critical Accounting Policies, Liability for Losses and LAE, multiple methods and assumptions are made in the actuarial testing of loss and LAE reserves. FPICs only significant line of business is medical professional liability insurance, which insures physicians, dentists and other health care providers against professional liability claims associated with the practice of medicine. The number of claims are relatively few in number and the number that actually result in an indemnity (loss) payment are fewer and tend to be significant in amount (as opposed to a large number of small claims, relatively speaking), as they comprise compensation and damages to injured patients.
The primary factors affecting FPICs MPL loss and LAE reserves can be summarized in terms of frequency and severity trends, including the frequency of indemnity payments (the percentage of claims received that ultimately result in a loss payment versus those that are settled and closed without a loss payment), the timing or pattern of future payments, the average cost of indemnity (loss cost) per claim, and defense cost trends. These factors, in turn, can be affected by the future judicial environment and tort-related trends. It is also important to note that all the actuarial methods used do not rely on specific assumptions for these factors; rather, these assumptions are developed as a by-product of the application of the methods, which may then be monitored and factored into the final judgmental considerations of the selection of the point estimate and range of reasonable values around the point estimate from among the methods.
All of these factors individually can and will vary from one period to the next over time but are estimated to approximate their ultimate assumed or average per claim values in setting reserve estimates. In addition, due to the relatively small number of claims and the average cost per claim, any change in trend determined with regard to any of the ultimate values assumed for these factors may be expected to result in a significant change in the reserve estimates. Also, given the size of our loss and LAE reserves, virtually any change in the level of carried reserves will be material to results of operations and may be material to our financial position. For example, a 1% increase or decrease in carried reserves, net of reinsurance, as of March 31, 2004, would result in an after-tax addition or reduction in reported income of approximately $1.8 million ($2.9 million before income taxes), which would comprise 26% of FPICs consolidated net income for the quarter ended March 31, 2004.
29
The decrease in premiums paid in advance and unprocessed premiums reflects the number of policy renewals that fall on January 1. As a result of this renewal period, paid in advance premiums are typically higher as of December 31 of each year.
The significant increases in other assets and accrued expenses and other liabilities of approximately $4.1 million and $7.4 million, respectively as of March 31, 2004, are primarily attributable to purchase and sale transactions involving investment securities, which were entered into prior to March 31, 2004, but for which settlements occurred in April 2004.
Stock Repurchase Plans
Under our stock repurchase program, we may repurchase shares at such times, and in such amounts, as management deems appropriate. We did not repurchase any shares during the first quarter of 2004 and a total of 365,500 shares remain available to be repurchased under the program. Under certain circumstances, limitations may be placed on FPICs ability to purchase its capital stock by the terms of agreements relating to its junior subordinated debentures. For information regarding these limitations, refer to Note 5, Long Term Debt to the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements, or Note 13, Long Term Debt, Revolving Credit Facility and Term Loan, to the consolidated financial statements in our most recently filed Form 10-K. For additional information, see also the discussion of Liquidity and Capital Resources, below.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
The payment of losses and LAE, insurance operating expenses (including reinsurance costs), claims administration and management expenses, non-insurance operating expenses, interest expense and income taxes in the ordinary course of business are the principal needs for our liquid funds. The principal sources of cash from our operations to meet our on-going liquidity requirements are the premiums collected for the insurance sold by our insurance subsidiaries, income on the investment of those funds, and claims administration and management fees and reinsurance brokerage and other commission income earned by our non-insurance subsidiaries.
Net Cash (Used In) Provided By Operating Activities
As reported in the condensed
consolidated statement of cash flows, net cash used in operating activities was
$2.7 million for three months ended March 31, 2004 compared with net cash
provided by operating activities of
$23.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2003. The net use of cash for operating
activities for the three months ended March 31, 2004 can be attributed to an
increase in paid losses and LAE for the quarter relative to amounts paid in the
first quarter of 2003. Paid losses and
LAE in the first quarter of 2004 were proportionately higher relative to
premiums written and collected primarily as the result of significant growth in
the business during 2001 and 2002, and taking into account the inherent time
lag between that growth and subsequent development and settlements of the
related claims. Also adding to higher
paid losses and LAE were several reinsured claims that were settled in the
first quarter of 2004, but for which the related reinsurance recoveries had not
yet been received as of March 31, 2004.
At March 31, 2004, we had cash
and invested assets of $632.5 million and held fixed maturity debt securities
with a fair value of approximately $8.2 million with scheduled maturities
during the next twelve months. We
believe that our cash and invested assets as of March 31, 2004, combined with
expected cash flows from operating activities for the remainder of the year and
the scheduled maturities of investments in 2004, will be sufficient to meet our
cash needs for operating purposes for at least the next twelve months.
30
A number of factors could cause unexpected changes in liquidity and capital resources available, including but not limited to the following:
1. |
Unexpected changes in premium revenue due to higher or lower than expected new business or retention of insurance policies in force; |
|
|
2. |
Unexpected changes in the amounts needed to defend and settle claims; |
|
|
3. |
Unexpected changes in operating costs, including new or increased taxes; |
|
|
4. |
Failure of one or more of our reinsurers leading to uncollectible reinsurance recoverables; |
|
|
5. |
Possible impairments of our long term investments; and |
|
|
6. |
Unexpected changes in liquidity provided by our reciprocal management and TPA segments. |
Furthermore, liquidity and capital risks can come about as the result of the broader business and financial risks facing us including the uncertainties and factors disclosed in the Safe Harbor Disclosure. Many, if not most of these types of uncertainties, could have a corresponding and materially negative effect on our liquidity and capital resources, as well as our financial condition and results of operations. In order to compensate for such risk, we:
1. |
Maintain what management considers to be adequate capital and reinsurance; |
|
|
2. |
Monitor our reserves and regularly perform actuarial reviews of loss and LAE reserves; and |
|
|
3. |
Attempt to maintain adequate asset diversification and liquidity (by managing our cash flow from operations coupled with the maturities from our fixed income portfolio investments). |
Long Term Debt
Our junior subordinated debentures and senior notes are uncollateralized and
mature in 2033 unless we exercise our option to call them earlier, which is
generally 5 years from the date of issue.
No principal payments are due in the interim. These securities bear floating interest rates equal to the
three-month LIBOR plus spreads ranging from 3.85% to 4.2% (the interest rates
ranged from 4.97% to 5.32% as of March 31, 2004). The floating interest rates are adjustable quarterly with changes
in the three-month LIBOR, and in the case of the first two offerings, the
maximum rate that may be charged under the securities within the first five
years is 12.5%. We have also purchased
hedging instruments, as described below, designed to maintain the ultimate
floating rate interest cost on all of these securities within a stated range
for five years from closing.
Indenture agreements relating to FPICs junior subordinated debentures and trust preferred securities contain limitations, under certain circumstances, as to (i) the declaration or payment of dividends, or distributions thereon, or the redemption, purchase, acquisition or liquidation with respect to any capital stock of FPIC or its affiliates; (ii) the payment, in certain circumstances, of principal of, premium or interest on, or the repayment, repurchase or redemption of, debt securities of FPIC or its affiliates that rank in equal standing with or are junior in interest to the debentures; or (iii) the payment, in certain circumstances, under any guarantees of FPIC or its affiliates that rank equal in standing with or junior in interest to capital securities guarantees relating to the issuance of the debentures. Circumstances that would result in such limitations include a continuing event of default, as defined by the indenture agreements, a default with respect to payment of any obligations under capital securities guarantees, or a continuing interest deferral election by FPIC.
31
Issuance costs for all three offerings in the aggregate amount of approximately $1.4 million were capitalized and will be amortized over their respective stated maturity periods of thirty years. In addition, hedge agreements were purchased that effectively place floors and caps on the three-month LIBOR floating interest of approximately 1.0% to 1.20% and 4.40% to 4.65%, respectively, on notional principal corresponding with the principal amounts of each offering, for 5 years from issuance. These instruments will effectively serve to hedge our total floating interest rate borrowing costs under the securities to within a range of 4.85% to 8.60% for five years and until such time that we have the right to call the securities. The initial costs of the hedge instruments acquired for this purpose of $1.1 million, in aggregate, have been capitalized and will be amortized over their respective five year maturity periods.
Contractual
Obligations, Commitments and Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
There have been no material changes in contractual obligations, commitments and
off-balance sheet arrangements described in the applicable section of the
MD&A included in our most recently filed annual report on Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2003.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
There have been no material changes in the reported market risks, as described in our 2003 annual report on Form 10-K, since the end of the most recent fiscal year.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
(a) |
An evaluation of FPICs controls and procedures (as defined by Rule 13a-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Act)), was completed as of March 31, 2004 by FPICs Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer. Based on such evaluation, FPICs disclosure controls and procedures were found to be effective in ensuring that material information, relating to FPIC and its consolidated subsidiaries, as required to be disclosed by FPIC in its periodic reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, is accumulated and made known to the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, and other management, as appropriate, to allow for timely decisions regarding required disclosure. |
|
|
(b) |
There have been no significant changes in FPICs internal controls over financial reporting identified in connection with the evaluation referred to in paragraph (a) above that occurred during the last quarter and that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, FPICs internal controls over financial reporting. |
Item 1. Legal Proceedings None
Item 2. Changes in Securities and Use of Proceeds
For information on our issuer repurchase program, see the MD&A section, Stock Repurchase Plans on page 30.
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities None
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders None
In accordance with the requirements of the Federal Securities Laws, FPIC recognizes blackout periods during which directors, officers and certain employees with an awareness of material, nonpublic information are prohibited from transacting in FPICs stock. FPIC will maintain a blackout period for such persons until 48 hours after the filing of this Form 10-Q with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
32
Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K
Exhibits:
31.1 |
Certification of John R. Byers, President and Chief Executive Officer, pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
31.2 |
Certification of Kim D. Thorpe, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
|
32 |
Certification of John R. Byers, President and Chief Executive Officer, and Kim D. Thorpe, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
Reports on Form 8-K:
On February 25, 2004, FPIC furnished a Form 8-K notifying the SEC that FPIC issued an earnings press release announcing selected financial data concerning fourth quarter 2003 unaudited consolidated results of operations and financial condition presented in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
May 10, 2004 |
FPIC Insurance Group, Inc. |
|
|
/s/ Kim D. Thorpe |
|
|
|
|
|
Kim D. Thorpe, Executive Vice |
33