UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
|X| QUARTERLY REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT
OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2002
or
|_| TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from _____________ to ___________
Commission file number 000-26422
DISCOVERY LABORATORIES, INC.
(Exact name of small business issuer as specified in its charter)
Delaware 94-3171943
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation (I.R.S. Employer Identification
or organization) No.)
350 South Main Street, Suite 307
Doylestown, Pennsylvania 18901
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
(215) 340-4699
(Registrants' telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required
to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during
the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was
required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past 90 days. Yes |X| No |_|
As of November 6, 2002, 32,849,683 shares of Common Stock, par value $.001 per
share, were outstanding.
Transitional Small Business Disclosure Format: |_| Yes |X| No
DISCOVERY LABORATORIES, INC., AND SUBSIDIARY
(a development stage company)
Table of Contents
Page
----
PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS --
As of September 30, 2002 (unaudited) and
December 31, 2001 ...................................... Page 4
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(unaudited) --
For the Three Months Ended September 30, 2002 and 2001;
for the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2002 and 2001;
and for the Period from May 18, 1993 (Inception) through
September 30, 2002 ...................................... Page 5
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(unaudited) --
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2002 and 2001;
and for the Period from May 18, 1993 (Inception)
through September 30, 2002 ............................. Page 6
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
- September 30, 2002 (unaudited) ....................... Page 7
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations ....................... Page 8
Item 3. Disclosures about Market Risk ............................. Page 21
Item 4. Controls and Procedures ................................... Page 21
PART II - OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings ......................................... Page 24
Item 2. Changes in Securities ..................................... Page 24
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities ........................... Page 24
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security
Holders ................................................... Page 24
Item 5. Other Information ......................................... Page 24
Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K .......................... Page 24
Signatures ......................................................... Page 26
Page 2
Unless the context otherwise requires, all references to "we," "us," "our," and
the "Company" include Discovery Laboratories, Inc. ("Discovery"), and its
wholly-owned, presently inactive subsidiary, Acute Therapeutics, Inc.
Safe Harbor Statement Under the Private Securities Litigation Act of 1996
Certain statements set forth in this report and any that are incorporated by
reference herein which are not historical, including, without limitation,
statements concerning our research and development programs and clinical trials,
the possibility of submitting regulatory filings for our products under
development, the seeking of collaboration arrangements with pharmaceutical
companies or others to develop, manufacture and market products, the research
and development of particular compounds and technologies and the period of time
for which our existing resources will enable the Company to fund its operations,
constitute "Forward Looking Statements" within the meaning of Section 27A of the
Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
We intend that all forward-looking statements be subject to the safe-harbor
provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These
forward-looking statements are only predictions and reflect our views as of the
date they are made with respect to future events and financial performance.
Forward-looking statements are subject to many risks and uncertainties which
could cause our actual results to differ materially from any future results
expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements.
Examples of the risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to, the
inherent risks and uncertainties in developing products of the type we are
developing; possible changes in our financial condition; the progress of our
research and development (including the risk that our lead product candidate,
Surfaxin(R), will not prove to be safe or useful for the treatment of certain
indications); the impact of development of competing therapies and/or
technologies by other companies; our ability to obtain additional required
financing to fund our research programs; our ability to enter into agreements
with collaborators and the failure of collaborators to perform under their
agreements with us; the results of clinical trials being conducted by us; the
progress of the FDA approvals in connection with the conduct of our clinical
trials and the marketing of our products; the additional cost and delays which
may result from requirements imposed by the FDA in connection with obtaining the
required approvals; and the other risks and certainties detailed in Item 2:
"Management's Discussion and Analysis" and in any documents incorporated by
reference in this report.
Except to the extent required by applicable laws or rules, we do not undertake
to update any forward-looking statements or to publicly announce revisions to
any of the forward-looking statements.
Page 3
PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DISCOVERY LABORATORIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
(a development stage company)
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
Sept 30, December 31,
2002 2001
------------ ------------
(Unaudited)
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents $ 3,402,000 $ 3,758,000
Available-for-sale marketable securities 7,572,000 12,938,000
Note receivable - current 2,000 2,000
Prepaid expenses and other current assets 753,000 1,580,000
------------ ------------
Total current assets 11,729,000 18,278,000
Property and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation 1,122,000 822,000
Note receivable 195,000 197,000
Other assets 122,000 768,000
------------ ------------
Total assets $ 13,168,000 $ 20,065,000
============ ============
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable and accrued expenses $ 2,000,000 $ 1,750,000
Capitalized lease - current 114,000 44,000
------------ ------------
Total current liabilities 2,114,000 1,794,000
Deferred revenue 1,641,000 615,000
Credit facility with corporate partner 1,257,000 --
Capitalized lease 69,000 33,000
------------ ------------
Total liabilities 5,081,000 2,442,000
Stockholders' Equity:
Common stock, $.001 par value; 60,000,000 authorized; 26,452,166 and
25,546,293 shares issued and outstanding at Sept 30, 2002
and December 31, 2001, respectively 26,000 26,000
Additional paid-in capital 75,528,000 73,163,000
Unearned portion of compensatory stock options (95,000) (264,000)
Deficit accumulated during the development stage (67,321,000) (55,135,000)
Treasury stock (at cost; 38,243 shares of common stock) (239,000) (239,000)
Accumulated other comprehensive income 188,000 72,000
------------ ------------
Total stockholders' equity 8,087,000 17,623,000
------------ ------------
$ 13,168,000 $ 20,065,000
============ ============
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements
Page 4
DISCOVERY LABORATORIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
(a development stage company)
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations
(Unaudited)
May 18, 1993
(inception)
Three Months Ended Nine Months Ended through
Sept 30, Sept 30, Sept 30,
---------------------------- ---------------------------- ------------
2002 2001 2002 2001 2002
------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------
Revenues:
Research and development
collaborative contracts $ 368,000 $ 197,000 $ 1,388,000 $ 915,000 $ 3,446,000
------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------
Expenses:
Write-off of acquired in-process
research and development
and supplies -- -- -- -- 13,508,000
Research and development 3,475,000 1,921,000 9,801,000 5,732,000 38,171,000
General and administrative 1,633,000 733,000 4,303,000 2,772,000 22,270,000
------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------
Total expenses 5,108,000 2,654,000 14,104,000 8,504,000 73,949,000
------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------
Operating loss (4,740,000) (2,457,000) (12,716,000) (7,589,000) (70,503,000)
Other income and expense:
Interest income, dividends, realized
gains, and other income 256,000 (61,000) 607,000 658,000 3,959,000
Minority interest in net loss of subsidiary -- -- -- -- 26,000
Interest expense (45,000) (1,000) (77,000) (3,000) (121,000)
------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------
Net loss $ (4,529,000) $ (2,519,000) $(12,186,000) $ (6,934,000) $(66,639,000)
============ ============ ============ ============ ============
Net loss per common share -
basic and diluted $ (0.17) $ (0.12) $ (0.46) $ (0.33)
Weighted average number of common
shares outstanding - 26,440,880 21,188,000 26,222,925 21,045,000
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements
Page 5
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(Unaudited)
May 18, 1993
(inception)
Nine Months Ended through
Sept 30, September 30,
--------------------------- -------------
2002 2001 2002
------------ ----------- -------------
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net loss $(12,186,000) $(6,934,000) $(66,639,000)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in
operating activities:
Write-off of acquired in-process research
and development and supplies -- -- 13,508,000
Write-off of licenses -- -- 683,000
Depreciation and amortization 209,000 135,000 753,000
Compensatory stock options 169,000 329,000 3,343,000
Expenses paid using treasury stock and common stock 26,000 35,000 230,000
Loss on sale of property -- -- 4,000
Changes in:
Prepaid expenses, inventory and other current assets 827,000 (1,000) 408,000
Accounts payable and accrued expenses 250,000 (1,546,000) 1,867,000
Other assets 1,000 (18,000) (20,000)
Proceeds from research and development
collaborative agreements 1,833,000 -- 3,474,000
Amortization of deferred revenue (807,000) (593,000) (2,388,000)
Expenses paid on behalf of company -- -- 18,000
Employee stock compensation -- -- 42,000
Reduction of research and development supplies -- -- (161,000)
------------ ----------- ------------
Net cash used in operating activities (9,678,000) (8,593,000) (44,878,000)
------------ ----------- ------------
Cash flows from investing activities:
Purchase of property and equipment (332,000) (109,000) (2,083,000)
Proceeds from sale of property and equipment -- -- 575,000
Loan to related party -- (200,000) (200,000)
Related party loan payments received 2,000 -- 3,000
Acquisition of licenses -- -- (711,000)
Purchase of marketable securities (5,481,000) (5,583,000) (49,416,000)
Proceeds from sale or maturity of marketable securities 10,963,000 9,379,000 42,437,000
Net cash payments on merger -- -- (1,670,000)
------------ ----------- ------------
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities 5,152,000 3,487,000 (11,065,000)
------------ ----------- ------------
Cash flows from financing activities:
Proceeds from issuance of securities, net of expenses 2,956,000 1,000,000 58,300,000
Proceeds from credit facility 1,257,000 -- 1,257,000
Purchase of treasury stock -- (26,000) (121,000)
Principal payments under capital lease obligation (43,000) (13,000) (91,000)
------------ ----------- ------------
Net cash provided by financing activities 4,170,000 961,000 59,345,000
------------ ----------- ------------
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents (356,000) (4,145,000) 3,402,000
Cash and cash equivalents - beginning of period 3,758,000 7,281,000 --
------------ ----------- ------------
Cash and cash equivalents - end of period $ 3,402,000 $ 3,136,000 $ 3,402,000
============ =========== ============
Supplementary disclosure of cash flows information:
Interest Paid: $ (37,000) $ 3,000 $ 7,000
Noncash transactions:
Class H warrants issued/revalued $ (617,000) $ -- $ 151,000
Accrued dividends on Series C preferred stock -- -- 682,000
Series C preferred stock dividends paid using common stock -- -- 204,000
Preferred Stock issued for inventory -- -- 575,000
Equipment acquired through capitalized lease 149,000 -- 274,000
Unrealized gain (loss) on marketable securities 116,000 199,000 188,000
Page 6
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)
NOTE 1 - THE COMPANY AND BASIS OF PRESENTATION
The Company
Discovery Laboratories, Inc. ("we" or the "Company"), is a development stage
specialty pharmaceutical company leveraging its platform technology in humanized
lung surfactants to develop novel respiratory therapies and pulmonary drug
delivery products. Surfactants are produced naturally in the lungs and are
essential to the lungs' ability to absorb oxygen.
The Company's humanized surfactant technology is being developed initially for
critical care patients with life-threatening respiratory disorders where there
are few, if any, approved therapies. These severe respiratory disorders
generally are associated with a lack of functional surfactant. The Company's
lead product, Surfaxin(R), is an engineered humanized surfactant and is
currently in two Phase 3 clinical trials for Respiratory Distress Syndrome in
premature infants (RDS), a Phase 3 clinical trial for Meconium Aspiration
Syndrome in full-term infants (MAS), and a Phase 2 clinical trial for Acute
Respiratory Distress Syndrome in adults (ARDS).
The Company is also performing research and development of aerosolized
formulations of its humanized surfactant technology to treat respiratory
conditions such as asthma and as a novel pulmonary drug delivery vehicle to
render drugs more effective when delivered to or via the respiratory tract.
Basis of Presentation
The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been
prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States for interim financial information in accordance with the
instructions to Form 10-Q. Accordingly, they do not include all of the
information and footnotes required by accounting principles generally accepted
in the United States for complete financial statements. In the opinion of
management, all adjustments (consisting of normally recurring accruals)
considered for fair presentation have been included. Operating results for the
nine-month period ended September 30, 2002, are not necessarily indicative of
the results that may be expected for the year ended December 31, 2002. For
further information, refer to the consolidated financial statements and
footnotes thereto included in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the
year ended December 31, 2001.
The Company is a development stage company and has incurred substantial losses
since inception. To date, the Company has funded its operations primarily
through the issuance of equity. The Company expects to continue to expend
substantial amounts for continued product research, development, and initial
commercialization activities for the foreseeable future. Management's plans with
respect to funding these development and commercialization activities are to use
its secured revolving credit facility with Quintiles Transnational Corp., secure
additional capital through the issuance of equity, if possible, and to secure
collaborative arrangements that will provide available cash funding for
operations. Continuation of the Company is dependent on its ability to obtain
additional financing and, ultimately, on its ability to achieve profitable
operations. There is no assurance, however, that such financing will be
available or that the Company's efforts ultimately will be successful.
All of the Company's current products under development are subject to license
agreements that will require the payment of future royalties.
Certain prior year balances have been reclassified to conform with the current
presentation. The reclassification had no effect on net income.
NOTE 2 - NET LOSS PER SHARE
Net loss per share is computed based on the weighted average number of common
shares outstanding for the periods. Common shares issuable upon the exercise of
options and warrants and the conversion of convertible securities are not
included in the calculation of the net loss per share as their effect would be
antidilutive.
NOTE 3 - COMPREHENSIVE LOSS
Total comprehensive loss was approximately $4,424,000 and $12,070,000 for the
three and nine months ended September 30, 2002, and approximately $2,095,000 and
$6,735,000 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2001, respectively.
Page 7
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS
OF OPERATIONS
Overview
We are a specialty pharmaceutical company applying our technology in humanized
lung surfactants to develop potential novel respiratory therapies and pulmonary
drug delivery products. Surfaxin, our lead product, is currently in two Phase 3
clinical trials for Respiratory Distress Syndrome in premature infants, a Phase
3 clinical trial for Meconium Aspiration Syndrome in full-term infants and a
Phase 2 clinical trial for Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome in adults. We are
also developing aerosolized formulations of our humanized surfactant to treat
respiratory conditions such as asthma and as a novel pulmonary drug delivery
vehicle to render drugs more effective when delivered to or via the respiratory
tract.
We are presently developing a dedicated sales and marketing capability through a
collaboration with Quintiles Transnational Corp. to commercialize Surfaxin for
Respiratory Distress Syndrome and Meconium Aspiration Syndrome in the United
States. We expanded our relationship with Laboratorios del Dr. Esteve, S.A., by
entering into a strategic alliance with Esteve to commercialize Surfaxin in
Europe, Central and South America, and Mexico. In the non-critical care,
ambulatory markets, we plan to establish strategic alliances for the development
and commercialization of our products.
Since our inception, we have incurred significant losses and, as of September
30, 2002, had a deficit accumulated during the development stage of
approximately $66.6 million (including historical results of predecessor
companies). Most of our expenditures to date have been for research and
development activities and general and administrative expenses. Research and
development expenses represent costs incurred for clinical trials, regulatory
filings and manufacturing efforts (including raw material costs). We expense our
research and development costs as they are incurred. General and administrative
expenses consist primarily of salaries and related expenses, rents and general
corporate activities.
On November 5, 2002, we raised approximately $12.8 million in gross proceeds in
a private offering of units consisting of an aggregate of approximately 6.4
million shares of common stock and warrants to purchase an aggregate of
approximately 2.9 million shares of common stock. We discuss this financing
further in "Liquidity and Capital Resources," below.
Plan of Operations
We expect to continue to incur increasing operating losses for the foreseeable
future, primarily due to our continued research and development activities
attributable to new and existing products, manufacturing, initial
commercialization, and general and administrative activities.
We anticipate that during the next 12 to 24 months we will:
(i) significantly increase our research, development and regulatory
activities. It is anticipated that the primary focus of our research and
development activities will be the several clinical trials for Surfaxin
indications and related regulatory filings. In the fall of 2001, we
initiated two pivotal, landmark multinational Phase 3 trials for
Respiratory Distress Syndrome in premature infants: a 1,500 patient trial
and a 500 patient supporting trial. The majority of our development
resources are focused on these trials and we currently anticipate
completing the trials, announcing data and filing a New Drug Application
in the second quarter of 2003. For Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome in
adults, we currently are conducting a Phase 2 dose-ranging safety and
efficacy study of up to 110 patients in the United States. In July 2002,
we completed the dose escalation safety and tolerability part of the study
and are currently enrolling patients in the final part of the trial. We
currently expect data from the Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome trial
to be available in the first quarter of 2003. For Meconium Aspiration
Syndrome in full-term infants, we currently are conducting a Phase 3
clinical trial of up to 200 patients in the United States. Enrollment is
ongoing but has been slower than expected and completion is currently
anticipated for late 2003. Given our belief in the importance of the
pivotal Phase 3 trial for Respiratory Distress Syndrome in premature
infants to our present development
Page 8
plan, resources have been and may continue to be reallocated from other
programs to the Respiratory Distress Syndrome program, as needed.
The research and development, clinical trial and regulatory process is
lengthy, expensive and uncertain and subject to numerous risks including,
without limitation, the risks discussed below in "Risks Related to Our
Business-The clinical trial and regulatory approval process for our
products will be expensive and time consuming, and the outcome is
uncertain."
(ii) conduct research and development of aerosolized formulations of our
humanized surfactant in order to develop new products intended to treat
respiratory conditions such as asthma, COPD, and Acute Lung Injury/Acute
Respiratory Distress Syndrome and as a novel pulmonary drug delivery
vehicle to deliver drugs via the respiratory tract. See the risks
discussed below in "Risks Related to Our Business-The clinical trial and
regulatory approval process for our products will be expensive and time
consuming, and the outcome is uncertain."
(iii) invest in additional manufacturing capability in anticipation of
optimizing the production process for Surfaxin and to allow scale up of
the manufacturing process to meet our clinical and commercial needs as
they expand.
(iv) invest in additional general and administrative resources primarily to
support our business development initiatives, financial systems and
controls and management information technologies.
(v) invest in marketing and commercialization management infrastructure to
manage the strategic relationships with our collaborative partners for the
launch of Surfaxin, if approved, and the execution of our
"Discovery/Surfaxin" worldwide marketing strategy.
On December 10, 2001, we entered into a collaboration arrangement with
Quintiles, and its affiliate, PharmaBio Development Inc., to provide certain
commercialization services in the United States for Surfaxin for the treatment
of Respiratory Distress Syndrome in premature infants and Meconium Aspiration
Syndrome in full-term infants. Quintiles will hire and train a dedicated United
States sales force that will be branded in the market as ours. Quintiles made a
financial commitment to us that included a $3 million equity investment, a
secured, revolving credit facility of up to $8.5 to $10 million to fund Surfaxin
pre-launch activities and up to $70 million in post-launch funding to cover the
first seven years of U.S. sales and marketing costs. In return, Quintiles will
receive a commission on net sales of Surfaxin over a ten-year period. We may
also receive milestone payments from PharmaBio that would be used to offset
amounts owed under the credit facility. The Quintiles arrangement allows us to
retain product ownership and have sales and marketing expertise in place for the
commercialization of Surfaxin in the U.S., if approved. Additionally, the
arrangement allows for the specialty sales force to become ours at the end of
the seven-year term, with an option to acquire it sooner.
In March 2002, we expanded our existing alliance with Esteve to develop, market
and sell Surfaxin throughout Europe, Central and South America, and Mexico. In
connection with this new Esteve collaboration, Esteve purchased $4 million of
common stock (at a 50% premium over the average closing price for the 30 days
prior to the closing date) and paid us a non-refundable licensing fee of
$500,000. Esteve agreed to provide certain commercialization services for
Surfaxin for the treatment of Respiratory Distress Syndrome in premature
infants, Meconium Aspiration Syndrome in full-term infants and Acute Lung
Injury/Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome in adult patients. We have agreed to
an exclusive supply agreement which provides that Esteve will purchase from us
all of its Surfaxin drug product requirements at an established transfer price
based on sales of Surfaxin by Esteve and/or its sublicensee(s). Esteve has also
agreed to sponsor certain clinical trial costs related to obtaining regulatory
approval in Europe for Acute Lung Injury/Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
indications. Esteve also agreed to make certain milestone payments to us upon
the attainment of European marketing regulatory approval of Surfaxin. The
license fees (including the premium paid for common stock) has been accounted
for as deferred revenue and will be recognized as revenue using a straight line
method through the anticipated date of FDA approval for the first Surfaxin
neonatal indication.
We will need to generate significant revenues from product sales and or related
royalties and transfer prices to achieve and maintain profitability. Through
September 30, 2002, we have yet to generate any revenues from product sales, and
have not achieved profitability on a quarterly or annual basis. Our ability to
achieve profitability depends upon, among other things, our ability to develop
products, obtain regulatory approval for products under development and enter
into agreements for product development, manufacturing and commercialization. In
Page 9
addition, our results are dependent upon the performance of our strategic
partners and third party suppliers. Moreover, we may never achieve significant
revenues or profitable operations from the sale of any of our products or
technologies. See the risks discussed below in "Risks Related to Our Business-If
we cannot raise additional capital, we may need to discontinue our research and
development activities. In addition, any additional financing could result in
equity dilution."
Through September 30, 2002, we had not generated taxable income. At December 31,
2001, net operating losses available to offset future taxable income for Federal
tax purposes were approximately $47.5 million. The future utilization of such
loss carryforwards may be limited pursuant to regulations promulgated under
Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code. In addition, as of December 31, 2001,
we had a research and development tax credit carryforward of $846,000. The
Federal net operating loss and research and development tax credit carryforwards
expire beginning in 2008 and continuing through 2021.
Results of Operations
Net loss for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2002 were $4,529,000
($0.17 per common share) and $12,186,000 ($0.46 per common share), respectively.
Net loss for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2001 were $2,519,000
($0.12 per common share) and $6,934,000 ($0.33 per common share), respectively.
Included in the net loss for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2002
were non-cash charges of $857,000 and $1,257,000 for pre-launch marketing
activities for Surfaxin for which funding is provided by a secured revolving
credit facility pursuant to the Company's collaboration arrangement with
Quintiles Transnational Corp., $848,000 and $827,000 for net changes in prepaid
balances, and $7,000 and $353,000 for non-cash compensation charges,
respectively.
Revenues from research and development collaborative contracts for the three and
nine months ended September 30, 2002 were $368,000 and $1,388,000, respectively.
Revenues from research and development collaborative contracts for the three and
nine months ended September 30, 2001 were $197,000 and $915,000, respectively.
Such revenues are related to research and development funding associated with
our strategic alliance with Esteve, our Small Business Innovative Research
"SBIR" grant to develop Surfaxin for Acute Lung Injury/Acute Respiratory
Distress Syndrome in adults and our Orphan Products Development grant to develop
Surfaxin for Meconium Aspiration Syndrome in full-term infants.
Research and development expenses for the three and nine months ended September
30, 2002 were $3,475,000 and $9,801,000, respectively. Research and development
expenses for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2001 were $1,921,000
and $5,732,000, respectively. This increase primarily reflects clinical trial
costs incurred for the Company's lead product, Surfaxin, currently in three
Phase 3 trials and one Phase 2 trial, and research and development activities
related to our development of aerosolized formulations of our humanized
surfactant to treat respiratory conditions and as a pulmonary drug delivery
vehicle.
General and administrative expenses for the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2002 were $1,645,000 and $4,315,000, respectively. General and
administrative expenses for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2001
were $733,000 and $2,772,000, respectively. General and administrative expenses
consist primarily of the costs of executive management, financial and
accounting, business and commercial development, legal, facility and other
administrative costs. Included in general and administrative costs for the first
three quarters of 2002 is approximately $1,257,000 for pre-launch
commercialization activities (market research and analysis) for Surfaxin
conducted in connection with a collaboration arrangement with Quintiles (for
which funding is provided by the secured revolving credit facility with
PharmaBio discussed below in "Liquidity and Capital Resources"); and a non-cash
compensation charge of approximately $353,000 related primarily to options
granted to non-employee directors under the Automatic Option Grant Program of
the Company's Amended and Restated 1998 Stock Option Plan and to modifications
of the terms of certain options previously granted under such Automatic Option
Grant Program and held by three departing members of the Board of the Directors
of the Company. Such modifications extend the exercisability of such options to
their respective stated expiration dates, notwithstanding their original terms.
Interest income for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2002 was
$256,000 and $607,000, respectively. Interest income (loss) for the three and
nine months ended September 30, 2001 was ($61,000) and $658,000, respectively.
Interest income increased during the three months ended September 30, 2002 as
compared to the same period of 2001 due to $131,000 of realized gains this
period compared to ($232,000) of realized losses in the same period of 2001.
Interest income decreased during the nine months ended September
Page 10
30, 2002 as compared to the same period of 2001 due to declines in interest
rates and the average balance of marketable securities.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
As of September 30, 2002, we had working capital of approximately $9.6 million
as compared to the working capital of approximately $13.5 million we had as of
June 30, 2002 and approximately $16.5 million we had as of December 31, 2001.
The decrease in working capital is due to funds used in our clinical trial and
research and development activities offset by funds received in connection with
the expansion, in March 2002, of our existing alliance with Esteve and the use
of the PharmaBio credit facility.
On November 5, 2002, we received approximately $11.9 million in net proceeds in
a private financing. In the financing, we issued 6,397,517 shares of common
stock and 2,878,883 Class I warrants to purchase shares of common stock at an
exercise price of $2.425 per share. The Class I warrants are first exercisable
beginning February 5, 2003, and have a five-year term expiring November 5, 2007.
We anticipate using the net proceeds from the financing for working capital and
for other general corporate purposes, primarily the continuing research and
development of our products. We believe our current working capital is
sufficient to meet our planned research and development activities into the
second quarter of 2004. We will need additional financing from investors or
collaborators to complete research and development and commercialization of our
current product candidates under development.
In December 2001, we entered into a secured revolving credit facility of up to
$8.5 million to $10 million with PharmaBio to fund pre-marketing activities for
a Surfaxin launch in the United States. The credit facility is available for use
until December 10, 2004, and monies become available in three tranches upon
satisfying certain conditions. In the third quarter of 2002, the first tranch
became available and upon completion of the November 2002 financing, the second
tranch is now available. The total funds available under the credit facility is
approximately $5.7 million, of which $1,257,000 was outstanding at September 30,
2002. In connection with the credit facility, we issued to PharmaBio Class H
warrants to purchase 320,000 shares of common stock. The Class H warrants are
exercisable at $3.03 per share (subject to adjustment) and are exercisable
proportionately only upon availability of the credit facility. To the extent the
credit facility availability is increased to greater than $8.5 million, for each
$1 million increase, the amount of shares of common stock issuable pursuant to
the Class H warrants shall be increased by approximately 38,000 shares.
Interest on amounts advanced under the credit facility will be payable quarterly
in arrears. We may repay principal amounts owed by us under the credit facility
from proceeds of milestone payments to be paid to us by PharmaBio upon the
achievement of certain corporate milestones. As of September 30, 2002,
$1,257,000 was outstanding under the credit facility. We are obligated to use a
significant portion of the funds borrowed under the credit facility for
pre-launch marketing services to be provided by Quintiles. As of September 30,
2002, the outstanding balance under the credit facility was used to fund
pre-launch marketing costs incurred in the first three quarters of 2002.
Our working capital requirements will depend upon numerous factors, including,
without limitation, the progress of our research and development programs,
clinical trials, timing and cost of obtaining regulatory approvals, timing and
cost of pre-launch marketing activities, levels of resources that we devote to
the development of manufacturing and marketing capabilities, levels of resources
that our collaboration partners devote to the development of sales and marketing
capabilities, technological advances, status of competitors, our ability to
establish collaborative arrangements with other organizations, the ability to
defend and enforce our intellectual property rights and the establishment of
additional strategic or licensing arrangements with other companies or
acquisitions.
Historically, the Company's working capital has been provided from the proceeds
of private financings:
Pursuant to the collaboration arrangement we entered into with Esteve on March
6, 2002, we issued 821,862 shares of common stock to Esteve at a purchase price
equal to $4.867 per share and received a licensing fee of $500,000, for
approximate aggregate proceeds of $4.5 million.
Pursuant to the collaboration arrangement we entered into with Quintiles and
PharmaBio on December 10, 2001, we issued to PharmaBio, for approximate net
aggregate proceeds of $2.7 million: (i) 791,905 shares of common
Page 11
stock at a price equal to $3.79 per share; and (ii) Class G warrants to purchase
357,143 shares of common stock at an exercise price equal to $3.485 per share.
The Class G warrants have a ten-year term.
On October 1, 2001, we received approximately $7.3 million in net proceeds from
a private financing. In the financing, we issued 3,562,759 shares of common
stock and 712,553 Class F warrants to purchase shares of common stock at an
exercise price of $2.365 per share. The Class F warrants have a five-year term.
On April 27, 2001, we received approximately $1 million in gross proceeds in a
private offering of 296,560 shares of common stock at a per share price equal to
$3.37.
In March 2000, we received approximately $17,500,000 in net proceeds from the
sale of 37.74 units from a private placement offering. Each unit consisted of
76,923 shares of common stock and Class E warrants to purchase an additional
15,385 shares of common stock for $7.38 per share. The Class E warrants issued
in the offering aggregate approximately 581,000 shares and are exercisable
through March 2005.
In October 1999, in connection with our strategic alliance with Esteve, we
issued to Esteve in a private placement 317,164 shares of common stock at a
purchase price of $2.68 per share.
In July 1999, we raised approximately $2,231,000 in net proceeds in a private
placement offering of an aggregate of 2,024,792 shares of common stock and
2,024,792 Class D warrants to purchase common stock. All of the Class D warrants
have been exercised.
During March and April 1999, we raised $1.0 million in a private placement
offering of 826,447 shares of common stock and 569,026 Class C warrants to
purchase common stock at an exercise price of $2.15 per share. The Class C
warrants are exercisable through April 2006.
We will require substantial additional funding to conduct our business,
including our expanded research and product development activities. Based on our
current operating plan, we believe that our currently available resources will
be adequate to satisfy our capital needs into the second quarter of 2004. Our
future capital requirements will depend on the results of our research and
development activities, clinical studies and trials, competitive and
technological advances and the regulatory process. Our operations will not
become profitable before we exhaust our current resources; therefore, we will
need to raise substantial additional funds through additional debt or equity
financings or through collaborative ventures with potential corporate partners.
We may in some cases elect to develop products on our own instead of entering
into collaboration arrangements and this would increase our cash requirements.
We have not entered into any additional arrangements to obtain any additional
financing. The sale of additional equity and debt securities may result in
additional dilution to our stockholders, and we cannot be certain that
additional financing will be available in amounts or on terms acceptable to us,
if at all. If we fail to enter into collaborative ventures or to receive
additional funding, we may have to reduce significantly the scope of or
discontinue our planned research, development and commercialization activities,
which could significantly harm our financial condition and operating results.
Furthermore, we could cease to qualify for listing of our common stock on the
NASDAQ SmallCap Market if the market price of our common stock declines as a
result of the dilutive aspects of such potential financings. See "Risks Related
to Our Business."
Risks Related to Our Business
The following risks, among others, could cause our actual results, performance,
achievements or industry results to differ materially from those expressed in
our forward-looking statements contained herein and presented elsewhere by
management from time to time.
Because we are a development stage company, we may not successfully develop and
market our products, and even if we do, we may not generate enough revenue or
become profitable.
We are a development stage company. Therefore, you must evaluate us in light of
the uncertainties and complexities present in a development stage biotechnology
company. We are conducting research and development on our product candidates.
As a result, we have not begun to market or generate revenues from the
commercialization of any of these products. To date, we have only generated
revenues from investments, research grants and collaborative research and
development agreements. We will need to engage in significant, time-consuming
and costly research, development, pre-clinical studies, clinical testing and
regulatory approval for
Page 12
our products under development prior to their commercialization. In addition,
pre-clinical or clinical studies may show that our products are not effective or
safe for one or more of their intended uses. We may fail in the development and
commercialization of our products. As of September 30, 2002, we have incurred a
deficit accumulated during the development stage of approximately $66.6 million,
and we expect to continue to incur significant increasing operating losses over
the next several years. If we succeed in the development of our products, we
still may not generate sufficient or sustainable revenues or we may not be
profitable.
If we cannot raise additional capital, we may need to discontinue our research
and development activities. In addition, any additional financing could result
in equity dilution.
We may need substantial additional funding to conduct our research and product
development activities. Based on our current operating plan, we believe that our
currently available resources will be adequate to satisfy our capital needs into
the second quarter of 2003. Our future capital requirements will depend on the
results of our research and development activities, clinical studies and trials,
competitive and technological advances and the regulatory process. If our
operations do not become profitable before we exhaust our resources, we will
likely need to raise substantial additional funds through collaborative ventures
with potential corporate partners and through additional debt or equity
financings. We may in some cases elect to develop products on our own instead of
entering into collaboration arrangements. This would increase our cash
requirements for research and development.
However, we have not entered into arrangements to obtain any additional
financing, except for the credit facility with PharmaBio Development Inc., a
subsidiary of Quintiles. Any additional financing could include unattractive
terms or result in significant dilution of stockholders' interests and share
prices may decline. If we fail to enter into collaborative ventures or to
receive additional funding, we may have to delay, scale back or discontinue our
research and development operations, and consider licensing the development and
commercialization of products that we consider valuable and which we otherwise
would have developed ourselves. Furthermore, we could cease to qualify for
listing of our securities on the NASDAQ SmallCap Market if the market price of
our common stock declines as a result of the dilutive aspects of such potential
financings. See "Risks Related to Our Business-The market price of our stock may
be adversely affected by market volatility."
The clinical trial and regulatory approval process for our products will be
expensive and time consuming, and the outcome is uncertain.
In order to sell our products that are under development, we must receive
regulatory approvals for each product. The FDA and comparable agencies in
foreign countries extensively and rigorously regulate the testing, manufacture,
distribution, advertising, pricing and marketing of drug products like our
products. This approval process includes preclinical studies and clinical trials
of each pharmaceutical compound to establish its safety and effectiveness and
confirmation by the FDA and comparable agencies in foreign countries that the
manufacturer maintains good laboratory and manufacturing practices (GMPs) during
testing and manufacturing. The process is lengthy, expensive and uncertain. It
is also possible that the FDA or comparable foreign regulatory authorities could
interrupt, delay or halt our clinical trials. If we, or any regulatory
authorities, believe that trial participants face unacceptable health risks, the
trials could be suspended or terminated. We also may not reach agreement with
the FDA and/or comparable foreign agencies on the design of clinical studies
necessary for approval. In addition, conditions imposed by the FDA and
comparable agencies in foreign countries on our clinical trials could
significantly increase the time required for completion of our clinical trials
and the costs of conducting the clinical trials.
To succeed, clinical trials require adequate supplies of drug substance and drug
product, which may be difficult or uneconomical to procure or manufacture, and
sufficient patient enrollment. Patient enrollment is a function of several
factors, including the size of the patient population, the nature of the
protocol, the proximity of the patients to the trial sites and the eligibility
criteria for the clinical trials. Delays in patient enrollment can result in
greater costs and longer trial timeframes. Patients may also suffer adverse
medical events or side effects that are common to this class of drug such as a
decrease in the oxygen level of the blood upon administration.
Clinical trials generally take two to five years or more to complete, and,
accordingly, our first product is not expected to be commercially available in
the United States until at least 2004, and our other product candidates will
take longer. The FDA has notified us that two of our intended indications for
Surfaxin, Meconium Aspiration Syndrome in full-term infants and Acute
Respiratory Distress Syndrome in adults, have been granted designation as "fast
track" products under provisions of the Food and Drug Administration
Modernization Act of 1997, and the
Page 13
FDA has awarded us an Orphan Products Development Grant to support our
development of Surfaxin for the treatment of Meconium Aspiration Syndrome. Fast
Track Status does not accelerate the clinical trials nor does it mean that the
regulatory requirements are less stringent. The Fast Track Status provisions are
designed to shorten the waiting period between the time the New Drug Application
is filed and the FDA's review of such application for new drugs intended to
treat serious or life-threatening conditions. The FDA generally will review the
New Drug Application for a drug granted Fast Track Status within six months
instead of the typical one to three years. Our products may not, however,
continue to qualify for expedited review and our other drug candidates may fail
to qualify for fast track development or expedited review. Even though some of
our drug candidates have qualified for expedited review, the FDA may not approve
them at all or any sooner than other drug candidates that do not qualify for
expedited review.
The FDA and comparable foreign agencies could withdraw any approvals we obtain.
Further, if there is a later discovery of unknown problems or if we fail to
comply with other applicable regulatory requirements at any stage in the
regulatory process, the FDA may restrict or delay our marketing of a product or
force us to make product recalls. In addition, the FDA could impose other
sanctions such as fines, injunctions, civil penalties or criminal prosecutions.
To market our products outside the United States, we also need to comply with
foreign regulatory requirements governing human clinical trials and marketing
approval for pharmaceutical products. The FDA and foreign regulators have not
yet approved any of our products under development for marketing in the United
States or elsewhere. If the FDA and other regulators do not approve our
products, we will not be able to market our products.
Our strategy, in many cases, is to enter into collaboration agreements with
third parties with respect to our products and we may require additional
collaboration agreements. If we fail to enter into these agreements or if we or
the third parties do not perform under such agreements, it could impair our
ability to commercialize our products.
Our strategy for the completion of the required development and clinical testing
of our products and for the manufacturing, marketing and commercialization of
our products, in many cases, depends upon entering into collaboration
arrangements with pharmaceutical companies to market, commercialize and
distribute our products. On March 6, 2002, we expanded our relationship with
Laboratorios Del Dr. Esteve, S.A., by entering into a collaboration arrangement
with Esteve for Surfaxin covering all of Europe, Central America and South
America, and Mexico. Esteve will be responsible for the marketing of Surfaxin
for the treatment of Respiratory Distress Syndrome in premature infants,
Meconium Aspiration Syndrome in full-term infants, and Acute Lung Injury/Acute
Respiratory Distress Syndrome in adults. Esteve will also be responsible for the
sponsorship of certain clinical trial costs related to obtaining European
Medicines Evaluation Agency approval for the commercialization of Surfaxin in
Europe for the Acute Lung Injury/Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
indications. We will be responsible for the remainder of the regulatory
activities relating to Surfaxin, including with respect to European Medicines
Evaluation Agency filings.
On December 10, 2001, we entered into an exclusive collaboration arrangement in
the United States with Quintiles, and its affiliate, PharmaBio, to
commercialize, sell and market Surfaxin in the United States for indications of
Respiratory Distress Syndrome in premature infants and Meconium Aspiration
Syndrome in full-term infants. As part of our collaboration with Quintiles,
Quintiles will build a sales force solely dedicated to the sale of Surfaxin upon
the approval of a New Drug Application for either of the two indications. If
Quintiles and we fail to devote appropriate resources to commercialize, sell and
market Surfaxin, sales of Surfaxin could be reduced. As part of the
collaboration, PharmaBio is obligated to provide us with certain financial
assistance in connection with the commercialization of Surfaxin, including, but
not limited to, a secured, revolving credit facility for at least $8.5 million
which may be increased to $10 million. A failure by us to repay amounts
outstanding under the credit facility would have a material adverse effect on
us. To obtain the benefits of such financing, we are obligated to meet certain
development and performance milestones. The failure by us to meet the
milestones, our failure to meet other terms and conditions of the financing
leading to PharmaBio's termination thereof or the failure of PharmaBio to
fulfill its obligation to partially fund the commercialization of Surfaxin, may
affect our ability to successfully market Surfaxin.
If Esteve, Quintiles or we breach or terminate the agreements that make up such
collaboration arrangements or Esteve or Quintiles otherwise fail to conduct
their Surfaxin-related activities in a timely manner or if there is a dispute
about their respective obligations, we may need to seek other partners or we may
have to develop our own internal sales and marketing capability for the
indications of Surfaxin which Esteve and/or Quintiles have agreed to assist in
commercializing. Accordingly, we may need to enter into additional collaboration
agreements
Page 14
and our success, particularly outside of the United States, may depend upon
obtaining additional collaboration partners. In addition, we may depend on our
partners' expertise and dedication of sufficient resources to develop and
commercialize our proposed products. We may, in the future, grant to
collaboration partners rights to license and commercialize pharmaceutical
products developed under collaboration agreements. Under these arrangements, our
collaboration partners may control key decisions relating to the development of
the products. The rights of our collaboration partners would limit our
flexibility in considering alternatives for the commercialization of our
products. If we fail to successfully develop these relationships or if our
collaboration partners fail to successfully develop or commercialize any of our
products, it may delay or prevent us from developing or commercializing our
products in a competitive and timely manner and would have a material adverse
effect on the commercialization of Surfaxin. See "Risks Related to Our
Business-Our lack of marketing and sales experience could limit our ability to
generate revenues from future product sales."
If we cannot protect our intellectual property, other companies could use our
technology in competitive products. If we infringe the intellectual property
rights of others, other companies could prevent us from developing or marketing
our products.
We seek patent protection for our drug candidates so as to prevent others from
commercializing equivalent products in substantially less time and at
substantially lower expense. The pharmaceutical industry places considerable
importance on obtaining patent and trade secret protection for new technologies,
products and processes. Our success will depend in part on our ability and that
of parties from whom we license technology to:
- --defend our patents and otherwise prevent others from infringing on our
proprietary rights;
- --protect trade secrets; and
- --operate without infringing upon the proprietary rights of others, both in the
United States and in other countries.
The patent position of firms relying upon biotechnology is highly uncertain and
involves complex legal and factual questions for which important legal
principles are unresolved. To date, the United States Patent and Trademark
Office has not adopted a consistent policy regarding the breadth of claims that
the United States Patent and Trademark Office allows in biotechnology patents or
the degree of protection that these types of patents afford. As a result, there
are risks that we may not develop or obtain rights to products or processes that
are or may seem to be patentable.
Even if we obtain patents to protect our products, those patents may not be
sufficiently broad and others could compete with us.
We, or the parties licensing technologies to us, have filed various United
States and foreign patent applications with respect to the products and
technologies under our development, and the United States Patent and Trademark
Office and foreign patent offices have issued patents with respect to our
products and technologies. These patent applications include international
applications filed under the Patent Cooperation Treaty. Our pending patent
applications, those we may file in the future or those we may license from third
parties may not result in the United States Patent and Trademark Office or
foreign patent office issuing patents. Also, if patent rights covering our
products are not sufficiently broad, they may not provide us with sufficient
proprietary protection or competitive advantages against competitors with
similar products and technologies. Furthermore, if the United States Patent and
Trademark Office or foreign patent offices issue patents to us or our licensors,
others may challenge the patents or circumvent the patents, or the patent office
or the courts may invalidate the patents. Thus, any patents we own or license
from or to third parties may not provide any protection against competitors.
Furthermore, the life of our patents is limited. We have licensed a series of
patents from Johnson & Johnson, Inc., and Ortho Pharmaceutical Corporation which
are important, either individually or collectively, to our strategy of
commercializing our surfactant technology. Such patents, which include relevant
European patents, expire on various dates beginning in 2009 and ending in 2019.
We have filed, and when possible and appropriate, will file, other patent
applications with respect to our products and processes in the United States and
in foreign countries. We may not be able to develop additional products or
processes that will be patentable or additional patents may not be issued to us.
See also "Risks Related to Our Business-If we cannot meet requirements under our
license agreements, we could lose the rights to our products."
Page 15
Intellectual property rights of third parties could limit our ability to market
our products.
Our commercial success also significantly depends on our ability to operate
without infringing the patents or violating the proprietary rights of others.
The United States Patent and Trademark Office keeps United States patent
applications confidential while the applications are pending. As a result, we
cannot determine which inventions third parties claim in pending patent
applications that they have filed. We may need to engage in litigation to defend
or enforce our patent and license rights or to determine the scope and validity
of the proprietary rights of others. It will be expensive and time consuming to
defend and enforce patent claims. Thus, even in those instances in which the
outcome is favorable to us, the proceedings can result in the diversion of
substantial resources from our other activities. An adverse determination may
subject us to significant liabilities or require us to seek licenses that third
parties may not grant to us or may only grant at rates that diminish or deplete
the profitability of the products to us. An adverse determination could also
require us to alter our products or processes or cease altogether any related
research and development activities or product sales.
If we cannot meet requirements under our license agreements, we could lose the
rights to our products.
We depend on licensing arrangements with third parties to maintain the
intellectual property rights to our products under development. Presently, we
have licensed rights from Johnson & Johnson and Ortho Pharmaceutical, and the
Charlotte-Mecklenberg Hospital Authority. These agreements require us to make
payments and satisfy performance obligations in order to maintain our rights
under these licensing arrangements. All of these agreements last either
throughout the life of the patents, or with respect to other licensed
technology, for a number of years after the first commercial sale of the
relevant product.
In addition, we are responsible for the cost of filing and prosecuting certain
patent applications and maintaining certain issued patents licensed to us. If we
do not meet our obligations under our license agreements in a timely manner, we
could lose the rights to our proprietary technology.
In addition, we may be required to obtain licenses to patents or other
proprietary rights of third parties in connection with the development and use
of our products and technologies. Licenses required under any such patents or
proprietary rights might not be made available on terms acceptable to us, if at
all.
We rely on confidentiality agreements that could be breached and may be
difficult to enforce.
Although we believe that we take reasonable steps to protect our intellectual
property, including the use of agreements relating to the non-disclosure of
confidential information to third parties, as well as agreements that purport to
require the disclosure and assignment to us of the rights to the ideas,
developments, discoveries and inventions of our employees and consultants while
we employ them, the agreements can be difficult and costly to enforce. Although
we seek to obtain these types of agreements from our consultants, advisors and
research collaborators, to the extent that they apply or independently develop
intellectual property in connection with any of our projects, disputes may arise
as to the proprietary rights to this type of information. If a dispute arises, a
court may determine that the right belongs to a third party, and enforcement of
our rights can be costly and unpredictable. In addition, we will rely on trade
secrets and proprietary know-how that we will seek to protect in part by
confidentiality agreements with our employees, consultants, advisors or others.
Despite the protective measures we employ, we still face the risk that:
- --they will breach these agreements;
- --any agreements we obtain will not provide adequate remedies for this type of
breach or that our trade secrets or proprietary know-how will otherwise
become known or competitors will independently develop similar technology;
and
- --our competitors will independently discover our proprietary information
and trade secrets.
If the parties we depend on for manufacturing our pharmaceutical products do not
timely supply these products, it may delay or impair our ability to develop and
market our products.
We rely on outside manufacturers for our drug substance and other active
ingredients for Surfaxin and to produce material that meets appropriate
standards for use in clinical studies for our products. We have validated only a
single clinical manufacturing facility for our drug substance. We will also rely
on outside manufacturers for production of our products after marketing
approval. We may also enter into arrangements with other manufacturers for the
manufacture of materials for use in clinical testing and after marketing
approval.
Page 16
Our outside manufacturers may not perform as they have agreed or may not remain
in the contract manufacturing business for a sufficient time to successfully
produce and market our product candidates. If we do not maintain important
manufacturing relationships, we may fail to find a replacement manufacturer or
to develop our own manufacturing capabilities. If we cannot do so, it could
delay or impair our ability to obtain regulatory approval for our products and
substantially increase our costs or deplete any profit margins. If we do find
replacement manufacturers, we may not be able to enter into agreements with them
on terms and conditions favorable to us and, there could be a substantial delay
before a new facility could be qualified and registered with the FDA and foreign
regulatory authorities.
We may in the future elect to manufacture some of our products on our own.
Although we own certain specialized manufacturing equipment, are considering an
investment in additional manufacturing equipment and employ certain
manufacturing managerial personnel, we do not presently maintain a complete
manufacturing facility or manufacturing department and we do not anticipate
manufacturing on our own any of our products during the next 12 months. If we
decide to manufacture products on our own and do not successfully develop
manufacturing capabilities, it will adversely affect sales of our products.
The FDA and foreign regulatory authorities require manufacturers to register
manufacturing facilities. The FDA and corresponding foreign regulators also
inspect these facilities to confirm compliance with good manufacturing practices
(GMPs) or similar requirements that the FDA or corresponding foreign regulators
establish. Manufacturing or quality control problems could occur at the contract
manufacturers causing product production and shipment delays or a situation
where the contractor may not be able to maintain compliance with the FDA's
current GMP requirements necessary to continue manufacturing our drug substance.
If our third-party foreign or domestic suppliers or manufacturers of our
products or, if we decide to manufacture our products on our own, we, fail to
comply with GMP requirements or other FDA and comparable foreign regulatory
requirements, it could adversely affect our clinical research activities and our
ability to market and develop our products.
Our lack of marketing and sales experience could limit our ability to generate
revenues from future product sales.
We do not have marketing, sales or distribution experience or marketing or sales
personnel. As a result, we will depend on our collaboration with Quintiles for
the marketing and sales of Surfaxin for indications of Respiratory Distress
Syndrome in premature infants and Meconium Aspiration Syndrome in full-term
infants in the United States and with Esteve for the marketing and sales of
Surfaxin for the treatment of Respiratory Distress Syndrome in premature
infants, Meconium Aspiration Syndrome in full-term infants and Acute Lung
Injury/Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome in adult patients in all of Europe,
Central America and South America, and Mexico. See "Risks Related to Our
Business-Our strategy, in many cases, is to enter into collaboration agreements
with third parties with respect to our products and we may require additional
collaboration agreements. If we fail to enter into these agreements or if we or
the third parties do not perform under such agreements, it could impair our
ability to commercialize our products." If we do not develop a marketing and
sales force of our own, then we will depend on arrangements with corporate
partners or other entities for the marketing and sale of our remaining products.
The sales and marketing of Surfaxin for indications of Respiratory Distress
Syndrome in premature infants, Meconium Aspiration Syndrome in full-term
infants, and Acute Lung Injury/Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome in adult
patients in the relevant territories depends, in part, on Quintiles' and
Esteve's performance of their contractual obligations. The failure of either
party to do so would have a material adverse effect on the sales and marketing
of Surfaxin. We may not succeed in entering into any satisfactory third party
arrangements for the marketing and sale of our remaining products. In addition,
we may not succeed in developing marketing and sales capabilities, our
commercial launch of certain products may be delayed until we establish
marketing and sales capabilities or we may not have sufficient resources to do
so. If we fail to establish marketing and sales capabilities or fail to enter
into arrangements with third parties, in a timely manner, it will adversely
affect sales of our products.
Page 17
We depend upon key employees and consultants in a competitive market for skilled
personnel. If we are unable to attract and retain key personnel, it could
adversely affect our ability to develop and market our products.
We are highly dependent upon the principal members of our management team,
especially our Chief Executive Officer, Dr. Capetola, and our directors, as well
as our scientific advisory board members, consultants and collaborating
scientists. Many of these people have been involved in our formation or have
otherwise been involved with us for many years, have played integral roles in
our progress and we believe that they will continue to provide value to us. A
loss of any of these personnel may have a material adverse effect on aspects of
our business and clinical development and regulatory programs. We have an
employment agreement with Dr. Capetola that expires on December 31, 2005. We
also have employment agreements with other key personnel with termination dates
in 2003 and 2004. Although these employment agreements generally provide for
severance payments that are contingent upon the applicable employee's refraining
from competition with us, the loss of any of these persons' services would
adversely affect our ability to develop and market our products and obtain
necessary regulatory approvals, and the applicable noncompete provisions can be
difficult and costly to monitor and enforce. Further, we do not maintain key-man
life insurance.
Our future success also will depend in part on the continued service of our key
scientific and management personnel and our ability to identify, hire and retain
additional personnel, including marketing and sales staff. We experience intense
competition for qualified personnel, and the existence of non-competition
agreements between prospective employees and their former employers may prevent
us from hiring those individuals or subject us to suit from their former
employers.
While we attempt to provide competitive compensation packages to attract and
retain key personnel, some of our competitors are likely to have greater
resources and more experience than we have, making it difficult for us to
compete successfully for key personnel.
Our industry is highly competitive and we have less capital and resources than
many of our competitors, which may give them an advantage in developing and
marketing products similar to ours or make our products obsolete.
Our industry is highly competitive and subject to rapid technological innovation
and evolving industry standards. We compete with numerous existing companies
intensely in many ways. We intend to market our products under development for
the treatment of diseases for which other technologies and treatments are
rapidly developing and, consequently, we expect new companies to enter our
industry and that competition in the industry will increase. Many of these
companies have substantially greater research and development, manufacturing,
marketing, financial, technological, personnel and managerial resources than we
have. In addition, many of these competitors, either alone or with their
collaborative partners, have significantly greater experience than we do in:
- --developing products;
- --undertaking preclinical testing and human clinical trials;
- --obtaining FDA and other regulatory approvals or products; and
- --manufacturing and marketing products.
Accordingly, our competitors may succeed in obtaining patent protection,
receiving FDA or comparable foreign approval or commercializing products before
us. If we commence commercial product sales, we will compete against companies
with greater marketing and manufacturing capabilities who may successfully
develop and commercialize products that are more effective or less expensive
than ours. These are areas in which, as yet, we have limited or no experience.
In addition, developments by our competitors may render our product candidates
obsolete or noncompetitive.
Presently, there are no approved drugs that are specifically indicated for
Meconium Aspiration Syndrome in full-term infants or Acute Lung Injury/Acute
Respiratory Distress Syndrome in adults. Current therapy consists of general
supportive care and mechanical ventilation. Four products are specifically
approved for the treatment of Respiratory Distress Syndrome in premature
infants. Curosurf(TM) is a porcine lung extract that is marketed in Europe by
Chiesi Farmaceutici S.p.A., and in the United States by Dey Laboratories, Inc.
Exosurf(TM) is marketed by GlaxoSmithKline, plc, outside the United States and
contains only phospholipids (the fats normally present in the lungs) and
synthetic organic detergents and no stabilizing protein or peptides.
Survanta(TM), marketed by the Ross division of Abbot Laboratories, Inc., is an
extract of bovine lung that contains the cow version of surfactant
Page 18
protein B. Forrest Laboratories, Inc., markets its calf lung surfactant,
Infasurf(TM) in the United States for the treatment of Respiratory Distress
Syndrome in premature infants. Although none of the four approved surfactants
for Respiratory Distress Syndrome in premature infants is approved for Acute
Lung Injury or Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome in adults, which are
significantly larger markets, there are a significant number of other potential
therapies in development for the treatment of Acute Lung Injury/Acute
Respiratory Distress Syndrome that are not surfactant-related. Any of these
various drugs or devices could significantly impact the commercial opportunity
for Surfaxin. We believe that engineered humanized surfactants such as Surfaxin
will be far less expensive to produce than the animal-derived products approved
for the treatment of Respiratory Distress Syndrome in premature infants and will
have no capability of transmitting the brain-wasting bovine spongiform
encephalopathy (commonly called "mad-cow disease") or causing adverse
immunological responses in young and older adults.
We also face, and will continue to face, competition from colleges,
universities, governmental agencies and other public and private research
organizations. These competitors are becoming more active in seeking patent
protection and licensing arrangements to collect royalties for use of technology
that they have developed. Some of these technologies may compete directly with
the technologies that we are developing. These institutions will also compete
with us in recruiting highly qualified scientific personnel. We expect that
therapeutic developments in the areas in which we are active may occur at a
rapid rate and that competition will intensify as advances in this field are
made. As a result, we need to continue to devote substantial resources and
efforts to research and development activities.
If product liability claims are brought against us, it may result in reduced
demand for our products or damages that exceed our insurance coverage.
The clinical testing of, marketing and use of our products exposes us to product
liability claims in the event that the use or misuse of those products causes
injury, disease or results in adverse effects. Use of our products in clinical
trials, as well as commercial sale, could result in product liability claims. In
addition, sales of our products through third party arrangements could also
subject us to product liability claims. We presently carry product liability
insurance with coverages of up to $10,000,000 per occurrence and $10,000,000 in
the aggregate, an amount we consider reasonable and customary relating to our
clinical trials of Surfaxin. However, this insurance coverage includes various
deductibles, limitations and exclusions from coverage, and in any event might
not fully cover any potential claims. We may need to obtain additional product
liability insurance coverage prior to initiating other clinical trials. We
expect to obtain product liability insurance coverage before commercialization
of our proposed products; however, the insurance is expensive and insurance
companies may not issue this type of insurance when we need it. We may not be
able to obtain adequate insurance in the future at an acceptable cost. Any
product liability claim, even one that was not in excess of our insurance
coverage or one that is meritless and/or unsuccessful, could adversely affect
our cash available for other purposes, such as research and development. In
addition, the existence of a product liability claim could affect the market
price of our common stock.
We expect to face uncertainty over reimbursement and healthcare reform.
In both the United States and other countries, sales of our products will depend
in part upon the availability of reimbursement from third party payors, which
include government health administration authorities, managed care providers and
private health insurers. Third party payors are increasingly challenging the
price and examining the cost effectiveness of medical products and services. In
addition, significant uncertainty exists as to the reimbursement status of newly
approved health care products. Our products may not be considered cost
effective. Adequate third party reimbursement may not be available to enable us
to maintain price levels sufficient to realize an appropriate return on our
investment in the research and development of our products.
The United States and other countries continue to propose and pass legislation
designed to reduce the cost of healthcare. Accordingly, legislation and
regulations affecting the pricing of our products may change before the products
are approved for marketing to the public. Adoption of new legislation and
regulations could further limit reimbursement for our products. If third party
payors fail to provide adequate coverage and reimbursement rates for our
products, the market acceptance of the products may be adversely affected. In
that case, our business and financial condition will suffer.
Page 19
Directors, executive officers, principal stockholders and affiliated entities
own a significant percentage of our capital stock, and they may make decisions
that you do not consider to be in your best interest.
As of September 30, 2002, our directors, executive officers, principal
stockholders and affiliated entities beneficially owned, in the aggregate,
approximately 29% of our outstanding voting securities. As a result, if some or
all of them acted together, they would have the ability to exert substantial
influence over the election of our Board of Directors and the outcome of issues
requiring approval by our stockholders. This concentration of ownership may have
the effect of delaying or preventing a change in control of the Company that may
be favored by other stockholders. This could prevent transactions in which
stockholders might otherwise recover a premium for their shares over current
market prices.
The market price of our stock may be adversely affected by market volatility.
The market price of our common stock, like that of many other development stage
pharmaceutical or biotechnology companies, has been and is likely to be
volatile. In addition to general economic, political and market conditions, the
price and trading volume of our stock could fluctuate widely in response to many
factors, including:
- --announcements of the results of clinical trials by us or our competitors;
- --adverse reactions to products;
- --governmental approvals, delays in expected governmental approvals or
withdrawals of any prior governmental approvals or public or regulatory
agency concerns regarding the safety or effectiveness of our products;
- --changes in U.S. or foreign regulatory policy during the period of product
development;
- --developments in patent or other proprietary rights, including any third party
challenges of our intellectual property rights;
- --announcements of technological innovations by us or our competitors;
- --announcements of new products or new contracts by us or our competitors;
- --actual or anticipated variations in our operating results due to the level of
development expenses and other factors;
- --changes in financial estimates by securities analysts and whether our earnings
meet or exceed the estimates;
- --conditions and trends in the pharmaceutical and other industries;
- --new accounting standards; and
- --the occurrence of any of the risks described in these "Management's Discussion
and Analysis-Risks Related to Our Business."
Our common stock is listed for quotation on the NASDAQ SmallCap Market. For the
three-month period ended September 30, 2002, the price of our common stock has
ranged from $1.97 to $0.90. For the nine-month period ended September 30, 2002,
the price of our common stock has ranged from $4.19 to $0.90. We expect the
price of our common stock to remain volatile. The average daily trading volume
in our common stock varies significantly. For the three-month period ending
September 30, 2002, the average daily trading volume in our common stock was
40,427 shares and the average number of transactions per day was approximately
44. For the nine-month period ending September 30, 2002, the average daily
trading volume in our common stock was 46,633 shares and the average number of
transactions per day was approximately 49. Our relatively low average volume and
low average number of transactions per day may affect the ability of our
stockholders to sell their shares in the public market at prevailing prices and
a more active market may never develop.
In addition, we may not be able to continue to adhere to the strict listing
criteria of the SmallCap Market. If our common stock were no longer listed on
the SmallCap Market, investors might only be able to trade in the
over-the-counter market in the Pink Sheets(R) (a quotation medium operated by
the National Quotation Bureau, LLC) or on the OTC Bulletin Board(R) of the
National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc. This would impair the liquidity
of our securities not only in the number of shares that could be bought and sold
at a given price, which might be depressed by the relative illiquidity, but also
through delays in the timing of transactions and reduction in media coverage.
In the past, following periods of volatility in the market price of the
securities of companies in our industry, securities class action litigation has
often been instituted against companies in our industry. If we face securities
litigation in the future, even if meritless or unsuccessful, it would result in
substantial costs and a diversion of management attention and resources, which
would negatively impact our business.
Page 20
A substantial number of our securities are eligible for future sale and this
could affect the market price for our stock and our ability to raise capital.
The market price of our common stock could drop due to sales of a large number
of shares of our common stock or the perception that these sales could occur. As
of September 30, 2002, we had 26,452,166 shares of common stock outstanding. In
addition, as of September 30, 2002, up to approximately 8,138,600 shares of our
common stock were issuable on exercise of outstanding options and warrants.
Holders of our stock options and warrants are likely to exercise them, if ever,
at a time when we otherwise could obtain a price for the sale of our securities
that is higher than the exercise price per security of the options or warrants.
This exercise, or the possibility of this exercise, may impede our efforts to
obtain additional financing through the sale of additional securities or make
this financing more costly, and may reduce the price of our common stock.
Provisions of our Certificate of Incorporation and Delaware law could defer a
change of our management which could discourage or delay offers to acquire us.
Provisions of our Certificate of Incorporation and Delaware law may make it more
difficult for someone to acquire control of us or for our stockholders to remove
existing management, and might discourage a third party from offering to acquire
us, even if a change in control or in management would be beneficial to our
stockholders. For example, our Certificate of Incorporation allows us to issue
shares of preferred stock without any vote or further action by our
stockholders. Our Board of Directors has the authority to fix and determine the
relative rights and preferences of preferred stock. Our Board of Directors also
has the authority to issue preferred stock without further stockholder approval.
As a result, our Board of Directors could authorize the issuance of a series of
preferred stock that would grant to holders the preferred right to our assets
upon liquidation, the right to receive dividend payments before dividends are
distributed to the holders of common stock and the right to the redemption of
the shares, together with a premium, prior to the redemption of our common
stock. In addition, our Board of Directors, without further stockholder
approval, could issue large blocks of preferred stock.
Item 3. DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Our exposure to market risk is confined to our cash, cash equivalents and
available for sale securities. We place our investments with high quality
issuers and, by policy, limit the amount of credit exposure to any one issuer.
We currently do not hedge interest rate or currency exchange exposure. We
classify highly liquid investments purchased with a maturity of three months or
less as "cash equivalents" and commercial paper and fixed income mutual funds as
"available for sale securities." Fixed income securities may have their fair
market value adversely affected due to a rise in interest rates and we may
suffer losses in principal if forced to sell securities that have declined in
market value due to a change in interest rates.
Item 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Evaluation of the Company's Controls and Procedures. Within the 90 days prior to
the date of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, the Company evaluated the
effectiveness of the design and operation of its disclosure controls and
procedures (Disclosure Controls), and its internal controls and procedures for
financial reporting (Internal Controls). This evaluation (the Controls
Evaluation) was done under the supervision and with the participation of
management, including our Chief Executive Officer (CEO) and Chief Financial
Officer (CFO). Rules adopted by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)
require that the Company present in this section of the Quarterly Report the
conclusions of the CEO and the CFO about the effectiveness of the Company's
Disclosure Controls and Internal Controls based on and as of the date of the
Controls Evaluation.
Disclosure Controls and Internal Controls. Disclosure Controls are procedures
that are designed with the objective of ensuring that information required to be
disclosed in the Company's reports filed under the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 (Exchange Act), such as this Quarterly Report, is recorded, processed,
summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC's rules and
forms. Disclosure Controls are also designed with the objective of ensuring that
such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including
the CEO and CFO, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required
disclosure. Internal Controls are procedures which are designed with the
objective of providing reasonable assurance that the Company's (1) transactions
are properly authorized; (2) assets are safeguarded against unauthorized or
improper
Page 21
use; and (3) transactions are properly recorded and reported, all to permit the
preparation of our financial statements in conformity with generally accepted
accounting principles.
Limitations on the Effectiveness of Controls. The Company's management,
including, without limitation, the CEO and CFO, does not expect that our
Disclosure Controls or our Internal Controls will prevent all error and all
fraud. A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide
only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control
system are met. The design of the Company's control system reflects the fact
that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of such controls were
considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all
control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that
all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the company have been
detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in
decision-making can be faulty, and that breakdowns can occur because of simple
error or mistake. Additionally, controls can be circumvented by the individual
acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people, or by management
override of the control. The design of any system of controls also is based in
part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there
can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals
under all potential future conditions; over time, control may become inadequate
because of changes in conditions, or the degree of compliance with the policies
or procedures may deteriorate. Because of the inherent limitations in a
cost-effective control system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and
not be detected.
Scope of the Controls Evaluation. The CEO/CFO evaluation of our Disclosure
Controls and our Internal Controls included a review of the overall system's
objectives and design, the controls' implementation by the Company and the
effect of the controls on the information generated for use in this Quarterly
Report. In the course of the Controls Evaluation, the Company sought to identify
data errors, controls problems or acts of fraud and to confirm that appropriate
corrective action, including process improvements, were being undertaken. This
type of evaluation will be done on a periodic basis so that the conclusions
concerning controls effectiveness can be reported in the Company's Quarterly
Reports on Form 10-Q and Annual Report on Form 10-K. Our Internal Controls are
also evaluated on an ongoing basis by the personnel in our finance and
accounting organization and by our independent auditors in connection with their
audit and review activities. The overall goals of these various evaluation
activities are to monitor our Disclosure Controls and our Internal Controls and
to make modifications as necessary; our intent in this regard is that the
Disclosure Controls and the Internal Controls will be maintained as dynamic
systems that change (including with improvements and corrections) as conditions
warrant.
Among other matters, we sought in our evaluation to determine whether there were
any significant deficiencies or material weaknesses in the Company's Internal
Controls, or whether the Company had identified any acts of fraud involving
personnel who have a significant role in the Company's Internal Controls. This
information was important both for the Controls Evaluation generally and because
items 5 and 6 in the Section 302 Certifications as defined below require that
the CEO and CFO disclose that information to the Company's Audit Committee of
its Board of Directors and to its independent auditors and to report on related
matters in this section of the Quarterly Report. In the professional auditing
literature, significant deficiencies are referred to as reportable conditions;
these are control issues that could have a significant adverse effect on the
ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data in the financial
statements. A material weakness is defined in the auditing literature as a
particularly serious reportable condition where the internal control does not
reduce to a relatively low level the risk that misstatements caused by error or
fraud may occur in amounts that would be material in relation to the financial
statements and not be detected within a timely period by employees in the normal
course of performing their assigned functions. The Company also sought to deal
with other controls matters in the Controls Evaluation, and in each case if a
problem was identified, The Company considered what revision, improvement and/or
correction to make in accord with our on-going procedures.
In accord with SEC requirements, the CEO and CFO note that, since the date of
the Controls Evaluation to the date of this Quarterly Report, there have been no
significant changes in Internal Controls or in other factors that could
significantly affect Internal Controls, including any corrective actions with
regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.
CEO and CFO Certifications. Appearing immediately following the Signatures
section of this Quarterly Report there are two separate forms of Certifications
of the CEO and the CFO. The first form of Certification is required in accord
with Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (the Section 302
Certification). This section of the Quarterly Report which you are currently
reading is the information concerning the Controls Evaluation referred to in the
Section 302 Certifications and this information should be read in conjunction
with the Section 302 Certifications for a more complete understanding of the
topics presented.
Page 22
Conclusions. Based upon the Controls Evaluation, the Company's CEO and CFO have
concluded that, subject to the limitations noted above, the Disclosure Controls
are effective to ensure that material information relating to the Company is
made known to management, including the CEO and CFO, particularly during the
period when our periodic reports are being prepared, and that our Internal
Controls are effective to provide reasonable assurance that our financial
statements are fairly presented in conformity with generally accepted accounting
principles.
Page 23
PART II - OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS.
None.
ITEM 2. CHANGE IN SECURITIES.
In November 2002, the Company sold to certain institutional and accredited
investors shares of Common Stock and a newly created class of warrants of the
Company (the "Class I Warrants") for an aggregate purchase price of
approximately $12.8 million (the "November 2002 Financing"). After payment of
fees and associated expenses, the Company intends to use the net proceeds of
approximately $11.9 million for working capital and general corporate purposes,
including further development of Surfaxin and its platform technology, based on
humanized lung surfactants. The issuance of the securities received by investors
in the November 2002 Financing was deemed to be exempt from registration under
the Act in reliance on Section 4(2) thereof and Regulation D promulgated
thereunder because such issuance did not involve a public offering. Investors in
the November 2002 Financing represented their intention to acquire the
securities for investment only and not with a view to or for sale in connection
with any distribution thereof and appropriate legends were affixed to the
securities certificates issued in such transactions. The investors in the
November 2002 Financing had adequate access to information about the Company.
Moreover, such investors represented to the Company, and the Company believed,
that they were experienced in financial matters.
ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES.
None.
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS.
None.
ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION.
None.
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K.
(a) Exhibits:
99.1 Section 302 Certification of Chief Executive Officer
99.2 Section 302 Certification of Chief Financial Officer
99.3 Section 906 Certification of Chief Executive Officer
99.4 Section 906 Certification of Chief Financial Officer
(b) Reports on Form 8-K:
None.
Signatures, and Certifications of the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief
Financial Officer of the Company.
The following pages include the Signatures page for this Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q, and two separate Certifications of the Chief Executive Officer and
the Chief Financial Officer of the Company.
The first form of Certification is required by Rule 13a-14 under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act) in accord with Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (the Section 302 Certification). The Section 302
Certification includes references to an evaluation of the effectiveness of the
design and operation of the company's "disclosure controls and procedures" and
its "internal controls and procedures for financial reporting". Item 4 of Part I
of this Quarterly Report presents the conclusions of the CEO and the CFO about
the effectiveness of such controls based on and as of the date of such
evaluation (relating to Item 4 of the Section 302 Certification), and contains
additional information concerning disclosures to the Company's Audit Committee
Page 24
and independent auditors with regard to deficiencies in internal controls and
fraud (Item 5 of the Section 302 Certification) and related matters (Item 6 of
the Section 302 Certification).
The second form of Certification is required by section 1350 of chapter 63 of
title 18 of the United States Code.
Page 25
SIGNATURES
In accordance with the requirements of the Exchange Act, the Registrant has
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly
authorized.
Discovery Laboratories, Inc.
(Registrant)
Date: November 14, 2002 /s/ Robert J. Capetola
------------------------------------
Robert J. Capetola, Ph.D.
President/Chief Executive Officer
Date: November 14, 2002 /s/ John G. Cooper
------------------------------------
John G. Cooper
Sr. Vice President, Chief
Financial Officer (Principal
Financial Officer)
Page 26