Back to GetFilings.com
UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON,
D.C. 20549
FORM
10-Q
[X] |
QUARTERLY
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934 |
For the
quarterly period ended March 27, 2005
OR
[ ] |
TRANSITION
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934 |
For
the transition period from ____________ to
____________
Commission
File No. 001-31299 |
MEDICAL
STAFFING NETWORK HOLDINGS, INC.
(Exact
Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)
Delaware |
|
65-0865171 |
(State
or other jurisdiction
of
incorporation or organization) |
|
(I.R.S.
Employer Identification No.) |
901
Yamato Road
Suite
110
Boca
Raton, Florida 33431
(Address
of principal executive offices)
(Zip
Code)
(561)
322-1300
(Registrant’s
telephone number, including area code)
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be
filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the
preceding 12 months, and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for
the past 90 days. Yes [ X ] No [ ]
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule
12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes [X] No [ ]
Indicate
the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common
stock, as of the latest practicable date. 30,232,751
shares of common stock, par value $0.01 per
share, were outstanding as of May 3, 2005.
MEDICAL
STAFFING NETWORK HOLDINGS, INC.
INDEX
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
|
|
March
27, |
|
December
26, |
|
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
(in
thousands, except per share amounts) |
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
501 |
|
$ |
345 |
|
Accounts
receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $1,044
and $1,064 at March
27, 2005
and December 26, 2004, respectively |
|
|
57,648 |
|
|
57,478 |
|
Prepaid
expenses |
|
|
6,810 |
|
|
6,406 |
|
Other
current assets |
|
|
5,081 |
|
|
4,758 |
|
Total
current assets |
|
|
70,040 |
|
|
68,987 |
|
Furniture
and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation of $19,869
and $18,650 at March
27, 2005
and December 26, 2004, respectively |
|
|
8,317 |
|
|
8,481 |
|
Goodwill,
net of accumulated amortization of $8,545 at
both March
27, 2005
and December 26, 2004 |
|
|
129,474 |
|
|
129,474 |
|
Intangible
assets, net of accumulated amortization of $1,817
and $1,663 at March
27, 2005
and December 26, 2004, respectively |
|
|
2,284 |
|
|
2,438 |
|
Other
assets |
|
|
1,461 |
|
|
1,523 |
|
Total
assets |
|
$ |
211,576 |
|
$ |
210,903 |
|
LIABILITIES
AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts
payable and accrued expenses |
|
$ |
12,342 |
|
$ |
12,072 |
|
Accrued
payroll and related liabilities |
|
|
8,164 |
|
|
6,597 |
|
Current
portion of capital lease obligations |
|
|
224 |
|
|
385 |
|
Total
current liabilities |
|
|
20,730 |
|
|
19,054 |
|
Long-term
debt |
|
|
30,967 |
|
|
31,760 |
|
Deferred
income taxes |
|
|
10,605 |
|
|
9,808 |
|
Capital
lease obligations, net of current portion |
|
|
10 |
|
|
33 |
|
Other
liabilities |
|
|
225 |
|
|
222 |
|
Total
liabilities |
|
|
62,537 |
|
|
60,877 |
|
Commitments
and contingencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders’
equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common
stock, $0.01 par value, 75,000 shares authorized: 30,232
and 30,231 shares issued and outstanding at March
27, 2005
and December 26, 2004, respectively |
|
|
302 |
|
|
302 |
|
Additional
paid-in capital |
|
|
284,414 |
|
|
284,411 |
|
Accumulated
deficit |
|
|
(135,677 |
) |
|
(134,687 |
) |
Total
stockholders’ equity |
|
|
149,039 |
|
|
150,026 |
|
Total
liabilities and stockholders’ equity |
|
$ |
211,576 |
|
$ |
210,903 |
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated
financial statements.
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)
|
|
Three
Months Ended |
|
|
March
27, |
|
March
28, |
|
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
(in
thousands, except per share amounts) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service
revenues |
|
$ |
100,576 |
|
$ |
106,393 |
|
Cost
of services rendered |
|
|
79,132 |
|
|
84,224 |
|
Gross
profit |
|
|
21,444 |
|
|
22,169 |
|
Operating
expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling,
general and administrative |
|
|
17,082 |
|
|
17,262 |
|
Corporate
and administrative |
|
|
3,775 |
|
|
3,278 |
|
Depreciation
and amortization |
|
|
1,468 |
|
|
1,647 |
|
Loss
from operations |
|
|
(881 |
) |
|
(18 |
) |
Interest
expense, net |
|
|
797 |
|
|
960 |
|
Loss
before benefit from income taxes |
|
|
(1,678 |
) |
|
(978 |
) |
Benefit
from income taxes |
|
|
(688 |
) |
|
(381 |
) |
Net
loss |
|
$ |
(990 |
) |
$ |
(597 |
) |
Basic
and diluted net loss per share |
|
$ |
(0.03 |
) |
$ |
(0.02 |
) |
Weighted
average number of common shares outstanding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
and diluted |
|
|
30,231 |
|
|
30,221 |
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated
financial statements.
MEDICAL
STAFFING NETWORK HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
(Unaudited)
|
|
Three
Months Ended |
(in
thousands) |
|
March
27, 2005 |
|
March
28, 2004 |
|
Operating
activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
loss |
|
$ |
(990 |
) |
$ |
(597 |
) |
Adjustments
to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by operating
activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation
and amortization |
|
|
1,468 |
|
|
1,647 |
|
Amortization
of debt issuance cost |
|
|
176 |
|
|
160 |
|
Deferred
income taxes |
|
|
245 |
|
|
768 |
|
Provision
for doubtful accounts |
|
|
151 |
|
|
397 |
|
Changes
in operating assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts
receivable |
|
|
(321 |
) |
|
3,892 |
|
Prepaid
expenses and other current assets |
|
|
(177 |
) |
|
(1,431 |
) |
Other
assets |
|
|
(95 |
) |
|
58 |
|
Accounts
payable and accrued expenses |
|
|
252 |
|
|
1,445 |
|
Accrued
payroll and related liabilities |
|
|
1,567 |
|
|
1,880 |
|
Other
liabilities |
|
|
3 |
|
|
(6 |
) |
Cash
provided by operating activities |
|
|
2,279 |
|
|
8,213 |
|
Investing
activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases
of furniture and equipment |
|
|
(631 |
) |
|
(375 |
) |
Capitalized
internal software costs |
|
|
(518 |
) |
|
(293 |
) |
Cash
used in investing activities |
|
|
(1,149 |
) |
|
(668 |
) |
Financing
activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
repayments under revolving credit facility |
|
|
(793 |
) |
|
(7,344 |
) |
Principal
payments under capital lease obligations |
|
|
(184 |
) |
|
(284 |
) |
Proceeds
from exercise of stock options |
|
|
3 |
|
|
47 |
|
Cash
used in financing activities |
|
|
(974 |
) |
|
(7,581 |
) |
Net
increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
156 |
|
|
(36 |
) |
Cash
and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
|
|
345 |
|
|
825 |
|
Cash
and cash equivalents at end of period |
|
$ |
501 |
|
$ |
789 |
|
Supplemental
disclosures of cash flow information: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
paid |
|
$ |
6 |
|
$ |
23 |
|
Income
taxes paid, net |
|
$ |
52 |
|
$ |
44 |
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated
financial statements.
NOTES
TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
1.
ORGANIZATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING
POLICIES
Organization
Medical
Staffing Network Holdings, Inc. (the Company), a Delaware corporation, is a
provider of temporary staffing services in the United States. The Company's per
diem healthcare staffing assignments place professionals, predominately nurses,
at hospitals and other healthcare facilities to solve temporary staffing needs.
The Company also provides staffing of allied health professionals such as
specialized radiology and diagnostic imaging specialists and clinical laboratory
technicians. During 2004, the Company expanded its services to provide temporary
general staffing. The Company’s general staffing assignments place
individuals in a variety of areas including clerical, janitorial and food
services. The Company's temporary healthcare staffing client base includes
profit and non-profit hospitals, teaching hospitals, and regional healthcare
providers. Pursuant to the provisions of the Financial Accounting Standards
Board (FASB) Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 131,
Disclosures
about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information, the
Company considers the different services described above to aggregate into one
segment. Temporary staffing services represent 100% of the Company's
consolidated revenue for the three months ended March 27, 2005 and
March 28, 2004.
Basis
of Presentation
The
accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements of the
Company have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States for interim financial information and with the
instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do
not include all of the information and footnotes required by accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States for complete financial
statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal
recurring accruals) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been
included. Operating results for the three months ended March 27, 2005 are not
necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending
December 25, 2005.
The
condensed consolidated balance sheet as of December 26, 2004 has been derived
from the audited financial statements as of that date but does not include all
of the information and footnotes required by accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States for complete financial statements.
The
Company is currently evaluating its determination of operating segments, which
could change the reporting unit level at which it tests for goodwill impairment.
Any change in the reporting unit level would occur in the future when the
Company completes the evaluation and could result in a noncash impairment charge
to earnings, based on the results of the testing performed. If the Company is
required to record an impairment charge in the future, it would have an adverse
impact on results of operations.
Certain
reclassifications have been made to the 2004 condensed consolidated financial
statements to conform to the 2005 presentation.
For
further information, refer to the consolidated financial statements and
footnotes thereto included in the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended
December 26, 2004 (File No. 001-31299).
2.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
Stock-Based
Compensation
In
December 2004, FASB issued SFAS No. 123 (revised 2004), Share-Based Payment,
(SFAS No. 123(R)) which is a revision of SFAS No. 123, Accounting for
Stock-Based Compensation (SFAS No. 123). SFAS No. 123(R) supersedes Accounting
Principles Board (APB) Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees,
(APB No. 25). SFAS No. 123(R) requires all share-based payments to employees,
including grants of employee stock options, to be recognized in the income
statement based on their fair values. Pro forma disclosure is no longer an
alternative. Additionally, SFAS No. 123(R) amends the presentation of the
statement of cash flows and requires additional annual disclosures. SFAS No.
123(R) is effective for public companies beginning with the first interim period
that begins after June 15, 2005. In April 2005, the Securities and Exchange
Commission adopted a new rule that postponed the effective date for SFAS No.
123(R) to the fiscal year beginning after June 15, 2005. The Company expects to
adopt SFAS No. 123(R) on December 26, 2005, but has not yet determined if it
will use the modified prospective method or one of the modified-retrospective
methods. As permitted by SFAS No. 123, the Company currently accounts for
share-based payments to employees using the intrinsic value method in accordance
with the recognition and measurement principles of APB No. 25, and, as such,
generally recognizes no compensation cost for employee stock options, as options
granted under the Company’s plans have an exercise price equal to or greater
than the fair value of the underlying common stock on the date of grant. The
impact of adoption of SFAS No. 123(R), which may be material, cannot be
predicted at this time because it will depend on levels of share-based
compensation granted in the future. However, had the Company adopted SFAS No.
123(R) in prior periods, its impact would have approximated the impact of SFAS
No. 123 as described in the disclosure of pro forma net income and earnings per
share in Stock-Based Compensation Plans (see Note 3).
3.
STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION PLANS
The
Company grants stock options for a fixed number of common shares to employees
and directors from time to time. The Company accounts for employee stock options
using the intrinsic value method as prescribed by Accounting Principles Board
Opinion No. 25, Accounting
for Stock Issued to Employees, and,
accordingly, recognizes no compensation expense for stock option grants when the
exercise price of the options equals, or is greater than, the market value of
the underlying stock on the date of grant. Accordingly, the Company did not
recognize any compensation cost during the three months ended March 27, 2005 and
March 28, 2004 for stock-based employee compensation awards.
Application
of the fair value method prescribed by FASB SFAS No. 123,
Accounting
for Stock-Based Compensation (SFAS
No. 123), to the
Company’s options would require the Company to record the following pro forma
net loss and net loss per share amounts (in thousands, except per share
amounts):
|
|
Three
Months Ended |
|
|
March
27, |
|
March
28, |
|
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
Net
loss as reported |
|
$ |
(990 |
) |
$ |
(597 |
) |
Fair
value method of stock based compensation, net of tax |
|
|
(155 |
) |
|
(354 |
) |
Pro
forma net loss |
|
$ |
(1,145 |
) |
$ |
(951 |
) |
As
reported: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
and diluted loss per share |
|
$ |
(0.03 |
) |
$ |
(0.02 |
) |
Pro
forma: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
and diluted loss per share |
|
$ |
(0.04 |
) |
$ |
(0.03 |
) |
Pro forma
information regarding net income or loss is required by SFAS No. 123 and
has been determined as if the Company had accounted for its employee stock
options under the fair value method of that statement. The fair value of options
granted was estimated at the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option
pricing model with the following assumptions:
|
|
Three
Months Ended |
|
|
March
27, |
|
March
28, |
|
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
Expected
life |
|
|
3
- 8 |
|
|
3 -
8 |
|
Risk-free
interest rate |
|
|
4.05% |
|
|
3.25%
- 4.19% |
|
Volatility |
|
|
63% |
|
|
70% |
|
Dividend
yield |
|
|
0% |
|
|
0% |
|
4.
LONG-TERM DEBT
On
December 22, 2003, the Company entered into a senior credit facility (the
Senior Credit Facility) which replaced the previous facility. The
Senior
Credit Facility provided
a $65.0 million revolving credit facility (the Revolver) which expires in
December 2006 and a $17.0 million term loan (the Term Loan) which was due in
December 2005.
On June
25, 2004, the Company amended the Senior Credit Facility to reduce the Revolver
capacity from $65.0 million to $60.0 million. The amendment also favorably
modified certain financial covenants while increasing the applicable margin on
the Revolver by 0.5% and on the Term Note by 1.0%. In conjunction with the
amendment, on July 1, 2004, the Company repaid $5.0 million of borrowings under
the Term Loan. The $5.0 million can not be re-borrowed under the terms of the
Term Loan.
The amount
that can be borrowed at any given time under the Revolver is based on a formula
that takes into account, among other things, eligible accounts receivable and a
$7.0 million availability reserve, which can result in borrowing availability of
less than the full capacity of the Revolver.
On
February 24, 2005, the Company amended the terms of the Senior Credit Facility
whereby the Term Loan was reduced to $6.0 million, the applicable margin for the
Term Loan was reduced, the maturity of the Term Loan was extended to December
2006, the availability reserve was reduced to $5.0 million and certain financial
covenants were amended. The $6.0 million Term Loan repayment was funded with
borrowings under the Revolver.
The
amount that can be borrowed at any given time under the Revolver is based on a
formula that takes into account, among other things, eligible accounts
receivable and an availability reserve, which can result in borrowing
availability of less than the full capacity of the Revolver. The Revolver bears
interest at either prime rate or LIBOR plus an applicable margin (5.5% at March
27, 2005) with interest payable monthly or as interest rate contracts expire.
The Term Loan bears interest at LIBOR plus an applicable margin (7.5% at March
27, 2005) with interest payable as interest rate contracts expire. Unused
capacity under the Revolver bears interest at 0.5% and is payable monthly. The
Senior Credit Facility is secured by substantially all of the Company’s assets
and contains certain covenants that, among other things, limit the payment of
dividends, restrict additional indebtedness and obligations, and require
maintenance of certain financial ratios. As of March 27, 2005, the Company was
in compliance with all covenants.
As of
March 27, 2005, $6.0 million was outstanding on the Term Loan and $25.0 million
was outstanding under the Revolver and an additional $17.7 million was
immediately available for borrowing under the Revolver.
5.
COMPREHENSIVE LOSS
SFAS
No. 130, Comprehensive
Income,
requires that an enterprise (a) classify items of other comprehensive
income by their nature in the financial statements, and (b) display the
accumulated balance of other comprehensive income separately from retained
earnings and additional paid-in capital in the equity section of the balance
sheet. The items of other comprehensive income that are typically required to be
displayed are foreign currency items, minimum pension liability adjustments,
unrealized gains and losses on certain investments in debt and equity securities
and the effective portion of certain derivative instruments. The Company’s
results of operations were the sole component of comprehensive loss for the
three months ended March 27, 2005 and March 28, 2004.
6.
LOSS PER SHARE
|
|
Three
Months Ended |
|
|
March
27, |
|
March
28, |
|
(in
thousands, except per share amounts) |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
Numerator: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Numerator
for basic and diluted loss per share |
|
$ |
(990 |
) |
$ |
(597 |
) |
Denominator: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator
for basic and diluted loss per share |
|
|
30,231 |
|
|
30,221 |
|
Effect
of dilutive shares: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee
stock options |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
Denominator
for diluted loss per share-adjusted weighted
average shares and assumed conversions |
|
|
30,231 |
|
|
30,221 |
|
Basic
and diluted loss per share |
|
$ |
(0.03 |
) |
$ |
(0.02 |
) |
For the
three months ended March 27, 2005 and March 28, 2004, 2.0 million and 1.9
million options, respectively, were excluded in the calculation of diluted
shares as the impact of their conversion was anti-dilutive due to the net
losses.
7.
RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
The
Company provides staffing services to a healthcare system of which one of the
Company’s directors, Philip A. Incarnati, is the President and Chief Executive
Officer. During each of the three months ended March 27, 2005 and March 28,
2004, the Company billed approximately $0.8 million for its services. The
Company had a receivable balance from the healthcare system of approximately
$0.3 million at both March 27, 2005 and December 26, 2004.
The
Company provides staffing services to a healthcare system of which one of the
Company’s directors, David Wester, is the President. During each of the three
months ended March 27, 2005 and March 28, 2004, the Company billed approximately
$0.1 million for its services. The Company had a receivable balance from the
healthcare system of approximately $0.1 million at both March 27, 2005 and
December 26, 2004.
The
Company paid less than $0.1 million during each of the three months ended March
27, 2005 and March 28, 2004, to Florida Atlantic University (FAU) in connection
with a continuing education program for the Company’s nurses. One of the
Company’s directors, Dr. Anne Boykin, is the Dean of the College of Nursing at
FAU, a university located in Boca Raton, Florida.
8.
SUBSEQUENT EVENT
On March
31, 2005, the Company acquired certain assets of Quality Medical Professionals
(QMP), a temporary healthcare staffing company, for approximately $1.0 million
in cash. The
primary reason for the acquisition was to expand service offerings within the
temporary healthcare industry. QMP’s
results of operations will be included in the condensed consolidated statement
of operations beginning April 1, 2005, the date when the Company assumed
control.
9.
CONTINGENCIES
On
February 20, 2004, Joseph and Patricia Marrari, and on April 16, 2004, Tommie
Williams, filed class action lawsuits against the Company in the United States
District Court for the Southern District of Florida, on behalf of themselves and
purchasers of the Company’s common stock pursuant to or traceable to the
Company’s initial public offering in April 2002. These lawsuits also named as
defendants certain of the Company’s directors and executive officers
(collectively with the Company, the Defendants). The complaints allege that
certain disclosures in the Registration Statement/Prospectus filed in connection
with the Company’s initial public offering on April 17, 2002 were materially
false and misleading in violation of the Securities Act of 1933 (the Securities
Act). The complaints seek compensatory damages as well as costs and attorney
fees.
On March
29, 2004, a third class action lawsuit brought on behalf of the same class of
the Company’s stockholders, making claims under the Securities Act similar to
those in the lawsuits filed by Plaintiffs Joseph and Patricia Marrari and Tommie
Williams, was commenced by Plaintiff Haddon Zia in the Florida Circuit Court of
the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit in and for Palm Beach County, Florida. Defendants
removed this case to the United States District Court for the Southern District
of Florida and Plaintiff moved to remand the case back to the Florida Circuit
Court of the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, which motion Defendants opposed. On
September 16, 2004 the federal district court entered an order granting
Plaintiff’s motion to remand. On January 6, 2005, the state court stayed the
state court proceedings until further order of the court. The Zia complaint
seeks rescission or damages as well as certain equitable relief and costs and
attorney fees.
On March
2, 2004, another class action complaint was filed against the Company and
certain of its directors and executive officers in the United States District
Court for the Southern District of Florida by Jerome Gould, individually and on
behalf of a class of the Company's stockholders who purchased stock during the
period from April 18, 2002 through June 16, 2003. The complaint alleges that
certain of the Company’s public disclosures during the class period were
materially false and misleading in violation of Section 10(b) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act), and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder.
The complaint seeks compensatory damages, costs and attorney fees.
On July
2, 2004, the Marrari, Gould, Williams and Zia actions were consolidated,
although, as noted above, the Zia action was subsequently remanded to state
court. Plaintiff Thomas Greene was appointed Lead Plaintiff of the consolidated
action and the law firm of Cauley Geller Bowman & Rudman LLP was appointed
Lead Counsel for Plaintiffs. On September 1, 2004, Lead Plaintiff filed his
consolidated amended class action complaint (the Complaint). The Complaint makes
allegations on behalf of a class consisting of purchasers of the Company’s
common stock pursuant to or traceable to the Company’s initial public offering
in April 2002, for purposes of the Securities Act claims, and on behalf of the
Company’s stockholders who purchased stock during the period from April 18, 2002
through June 16, 2003, for purposes of the Exchange Act claims. The Complaint
alleges that certain of the Company’s public disclosures during the class period
were materially false and misleading in violation of Section 11 of the
Securities Act and Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act. The Complaint seeks
compensatory damages as well as costs and attorney fees. Defendants have a
motion to dismiss the Complaint.
The
Company believes that these lawsuits are without merit and it intends to defend
itself against them vigorously. Due to their preliminary status, the Company is
unable to predict the outcome of these lawsuits or reasonably estimate a range
of possible loss.
From time
to time, the Company is subject to lawsuits and claims that arise out of its
operations in the normal course of business. The Company is a plaintiff or a
defendant in various litigation matters in the ordinary course of business, some
of which involve claims for damages that are substantial in amount. The Company
believes that the disposition of any claims that arise out of operations in the
normal course of business will not have a material adverse effect on the
Company’s financial position or results of operations.
Introduction
Management’s
discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations is
provided as a supplement to our condensed consolidated financial statements and
accompanying notes to help provide an understanding of our financial condition,
changes in financial condition and results of operations. The discussion and
analysis is organized as follows:
· |
Overview.
This section provides a general description of our business, trends in our
industry, as well as significant transactions that have occurred that we
believe are important in understanding our financial condition and results
of operations. |
· |
Recent
accounting pronouncements. This
section provides an analysis of relevant recent accounting pronouncements
issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) and the effect
of those pronouncements. |
· |
Results
of operations.
This section provides an analysis of our results of operations for the
three months ended March 27, 2005 relative to the three months ended March
28, 2004 presented in the accompanying condensed consolidated statements
of operations. |
· |
Liquidity
and capital resources.
This section provides an analysis of our cash flows, capital resources,
off-balance sheet arrangements and our outstanding debt and commitments as
of March 27, 2005. |
· |
Critical
accounting policies.
This section discusses those accounting policies that are both considered
important to our financial condition and results of operations, and
require significant judgment and estimates on the part of management in
their application. |
· |
Caution
concerning forward-looking statements.
This section discusses how certain forward-looking statements made by us
throughout this discussion and analysis are based on management’s present
expectations about future events and are inherently susceptible to
uncertainty and changes in circumstance. |
Overview
Business
Description
We are a
leading temporary healthcare staffing company and the largest provider of per
diem nurse staffing services in the United States as measured by revenues. More
than two-thirds of our clients are acute care hospitals, clinics and surgical
and ambulatory care centers. We serve both for-profit and not-for-profit
organizations that range in scope from one facility to national chains with over
100 facilities. Our clients pay us directly. We do not receive a material
portion of our revenues from Medicare or Medicaid reimbursements or similar
state reimbursement programs.
Our per
diem nurse staffing division currently operates in an integrated network of
branches that are organized into several geographic regions. These branches
serve as our direct contact with our healthcare professionals and clients. The
cost structure of a typical branch is substantially fixed, consisting of limited
personnel, office space rent, information systems infrastructure and office
supplies. We have been able to develop a highly efficient branch management
model that is easily scalable. During 2004, we expanded our services to provide
temporary general staffing. Our general staffing assignments place individuals
in a variety of areas including clerical, janitorial and food services. We
believe that general staffing compliments our temporary healthcare staffing and
makes us a full service provider to our existing clients.
Industry
Trends
Service
revenues and gross profit margins have been under pressure as demand for
temporary nurses is currently going through a period of contraction. Due to the
current difficult economic times, the unemployment rate, while slightly improved
over the past year, remains high. We believe this has resulted in nurses in many
households becoming a primary wage earner, which is causing such nurses to seek
more traditional full-time employment, further adding to the already challenging
task of recruitment. Additionally, hospitals are experiencing sluggish
admissions trends and continue to place greater reliance on
existing full-time staff, resulting in increased overtime and nurse-patient
loads.
We cannot
predict when conditions will reverse, but we are confident in the long-term
growth of the industry. In a January 13, 2000 report, the U.S. Census Bureau,
Population Projections Bureau, projected that the number of Americans over 65
years of age is expected to grow from 34.5 million in 2000 to 53.7 million in
2020. In a July 2002 report, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
stated that the national supply of full-time equivalent registered nurses was
approximately 1.9 million while demand was approximately 2.0 million. This gap
between supply and demand for nurses is expected to grow from 0.1 million in
2000 to 0.8 million by 2020. Additionally, there is a growing trend to restrict
mandatory healthcare worker overtime requirements by employers and to establish
nurse-patient ratios. Several states have enacted legislation prohibiting
mandatory overtime and other states have similar legislation pending. In
conjunction with the aforementioned factors, as the economy rebounds, the
prospects for the healthcare staffing industry should improve as hospitals
experience higher census levels and increasing shortages of healthcare workers.
Service
Revenues
Our
temporary staffing services represent 100% of our consolidated revenue for the
three months ended March 27, 2005 and March 28, 2004. Approximately
75% of our revenues for the three months ended March 27, 2005 was derived from
per diem nurse staffing. Allied healthcare professional staffing, which includes
various non-nursing specialties such as, radiology and diagnostic imaging
specialists and clinical laboratory technicians, represented approximately 18%
of our revenues for the three months ended March 27, 2005. Travel nurse staffing
(assignments lasting no more than thirteen weeks) represented approximately 6%
of our revenues for the three months ended March 27, 2005. General staffing
represented approximately 1% of our revenues for three months ended March 27,
2005.
Recent
Accounting Pronouncements
Stock-Based
Compensation
In
December 2004, FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (SFAS) No.
123 (revised 2004), Share-Based Payment, (SFAS No. 123(R)) which is a revision
of SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation (SFAS No. 123).
Statement 123(R) supersedes Accounting Principles Board (APB) Opinion No. 25,
Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, (APB No. 25). SFAS No. 123(R) requires
all share-based payments to employees, including grants of employee stock
options, to be recognized in the income statement based on their fair values.
Pro forma disclosure is no longer an alternative. Additionally, SFAS No. 123(R)
amends the presentation of the statement of cash flows and requires additional
annual disclosures. SFAS No. 123(R) is effective for public companies beginning
with the first interim period that begins after June 15, 2005. In April 2005,
the Securities and Exchange Commission adopted a new rule that postponed the
effective date for SFAS No. 123(R) to the fiscal year beginning after June 15,
2005. We expect to adopt SFAS No. 123(R) on December 26, 2005, but have not yet
determined if we will use the modified prospective method or one of the
modified-retrospective methods. As permitted by SFAS No. 123, we currently
account for share-based payments to employees using the intrinsic value method
in accordance with the recognition and measurement principles of APB No. 25,
and, as such, generally recognize no compensation cost for employee stock
options, as options granted under our plans have an exercise price equal to or
greater than the fair value of the underlying common stock on the date of grant.
The impact of adoption of SFAS No. 123(R), which may be material, cannot be
predicted at this time because it will depend on levels of share-based
compensation granted in the future. However, had we adopted SFAS No. 123(R) in
prior periods, its impact would have approximated the impact of SFAS No. 123 as
described in the disclosure of pro forma net income and earnings per share in
Stock-Based Compensation Plans (see Note 3 to the condensed consolidated
financial statements).
Results of Operations
The
following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, certain selected
financial data expressed as a percentage of service revenues:
|
|
Three
Months Ended |
|
|
March
27, |
|
March
28, |
|
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
Service
revenues |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
100.0 |
% |
Cost
of services rendered |
|
|
78.7 |
|
|
79.2 |
|
Gross
profit |
|
|
21.3 |
|
|
20.8 |
|
Selling,
general and administrative |
|
|
17.0 |
|
|
16.2 |
|
Corporate
and administrative |
|
|
3.8 |
|
|
3.1 |
|
Depreciation
and amortization |
|
|
1.4 |
|
|
1.5 |
|
Loss
from operations |
|
|
(0.9 |
) |
|
(0.0 |
) |
Interest
expense, net |
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
0.9 |
|
Loss
before benefit from income taxes |
|
|
(1.7 |
) |
|
(0.9 |
) |
Benefit
from income taxes |
|
|
(0.7 |
) |
|
(0.3 |
) |
Net
loss |
|
|
(1.0 |
) |
|
(0.6 |
) |
Comparison
of Three Months Ended March 27, 2005 to Three Months Ended March 28,
2004
Service
Revenues. Service
revenues decreased $5.8 million, or 5.5%, to $100.6 million for the
three months ended March 27, 2005 as compared to $106.4 million for the
comparable prior year period. The decrease was due to a lower number of hours
worked by professionals caused by unfulfilled open orders resulting from the
current supply constrained environment. Average hourly billing rates remained
relatively consistent with those in the comparable prior year period.
Per diem
nurse staffing revenues decreased $5.1 million, or 6.4%, to $74.8 million
for the three months ended March 27, 2005 as compared to $79.9 million for
the comparable prior year period. The decrease was primarily due to a decrease
in the number of hours worked by professionals.
Revenues
from other than per diem nurse staffing collectively decreased
$0.7 million, or 2.6%, to $25.8 million for the three months ended
March 27, 2005 as compared to $26.5 million for the comparable prior year
period. The decrease was the result of a lower number of hours worked by
professionals, partially offset by revenues from general staffing which we did
not offer our clients in the first quarter of 2004.
Cost
of Services Rendered. Cost of
services rendered decreased $5.0 million, or 6.0%, to $79.2 million
for the three months ended March 27, 2005 as compared to $84.2 million for
the comparable prior year period. The decrease was primarily due to a lower
number of hours worked by professionals.
Gross
Profit. Gross
profit decreased $0.8 million, or 3.3%, to $21.4 million for the three
months ended March 27, 2005 as compared to $22.2 million for the comparable
prior year period. The decrease was primarily due to the reduction in service
revenues, partially offset by an increase in gross margin. Gross margin for the
three months ended March 27, 2005 was 21.3% as compared with 20.8% for the
comparable prior year period. The
increase was primarily due to more
favorable workers compensation and professional liability claims
experience.
Selling,
General and Administrative. Selling,
general and administrative expenses decreased to $17.1 million, or 17.0% of
revenues for the three months ended March 27, 2005, as compared to
$17.3 million, or 16.2% of revenues for the comparable prior year period.
The decrease was primarily due to the elimination of expenses associated with
cost reduction programs implemented during 2004.
Corporate
and Administrative.
Corporate and administrative expenses increased to $3.8 million, or 3.8% of
revenues for the three months ended March 27, 2005, as compared to
$3.3 million, or 3.1% of revenues for the comparable prior year period. The
increase was primarily due to increased professional fees.
Depreciation
and Amortization.
Depreciation and amortization for the three months ended March 27, 2005 was $1.5
million, as compared to $1.6 million for the comparable prior year period.
Interest
Expense, Net. Interest
expense, net, decreased to $0.8 million for the three months ended March
27, 2005, as compared to $1.0 million for the comparable prior year
quarter. The decrease was primarily due to lower average outstanding borrowings.
Benefit
from Income Taxes. Our
effective income tax benefit rate for the three months ended March 27, 2005 was
41.0% as compared to 39.0% in the comparable prior year period. The
increase in the effective tax benefit rate is due to nondeductible items having
a larger percentage impact on the rate than on the actual tax dollar
amount.
Net
Loss. As a
result of the above, net loss increased to $1.0 million for the three
months ended March 27, 2005 as
compared to net loss of $0.6 million for the comparable
prior year period.
Seasonality
Due to
the regional and seasonal fluctuations in the hospital patient census of our
hospital and healthcare facility clients and due to the seasonal preferences for
destinations by our temporary healthcare professionals, the number of healthcare
professionals on assignment, revenue and earnings are subject to moderate
seasonal fluctuations. Many of our hospital and healthcare facility clients are
located in areas, particularly Florida, that experience seasonal fluctuations in
population during the winter and summer months. These facilities adjust their
staffing levels to accommodate the change in this seasonal demand and many of
these facilities utilize temporary healthcare professionals to satisfy these
seasonal staffing needs.
Historically,
the number of temporary healthcare professionals on assignment has increased
from December through March followed by declines or minimal growth from April
through November. This trend may or may not continue in the future. As a result
of all of these factors, results of any one quarter are not necessarily
indicative of the results to be expected for any other quarter or for any year.
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
Discussion
on Liquidity and Capital Resources
Our
historical capital resource requirements have been the funding of working
capital, debt service, capital expenditures and acquisitions. We have
historically funded these requirements from a combination of cash flow from
operations, equity issuances and borrowings under our credit
facilities.
Cash flow
from operations was $2.3 million for the three months ended March 27, 2005
as compared to $8.2 million for the three months ended March 28, 2004. During
the three months ended March 27, 2005, we used cash generated from operations to
repay $1.0 million of borrowings under our senior credit facility and capital
lease obligations and $1.1 million to fund capital expenditures.
As of
March 27, 2005, we had net working capital of $49.3 million as compared to
$49.9 million as of December 26, 2004.
Available
borrowings under our senior credit facility is an important component of our
liquidity. On December 22, 2003, we entered into a new senior credit
facility (the Senior Credit Facility) which replaced the previous facility. The
Senior Credit Facility provided a $65.0 million revolving credit facility (the
Revolver) which expires in December 2006 and a $17.0 million term loan (the Term
Loan) which was due in December 2005.
On June
25, 2004, we amended the Senior Credit Facility to reduce the Revolver capacity
from $65.0 million to $60.0 million. The amendment also favorably modified
certain financial covenants while increasing the applicable margin on the
Revolver by 0.5% and on the Term Loan by 1.0%. In conjunction with the
amendment, on July 1, 2004, we repaid $5.0 million of borrowings under the Term
Loan. The $5.0 million can not be re-borrowed under the terms of the Term Loan.
The impact of repaying the higher average interest rate borrowings under the
Term Loan, offset partially by the marginally higher interest rates, will reduce
the overall cost of capital under the Senior Credit Facility going
forward.
On
February 24, 2005, we amended the terms of the Senior Credit Facility whereby
the Term Loan was reduced to $6.0 million, the applicable margin for the Term
Loan was reduced, the maturity of the Term Loan was extended to December 2006,
the availability reserve was reduced to $5.0 million and certain financial
covenants were amended. The $6.0 million Term Loan repayment was funded with
borrowings under the Revolver.
The
amount that can be borrowed at any given time under the Revolver is based on a
formula that takes into account, among other things, eligible accounts
receivable and an availability reserve, which can result in borrowing
availability of less than the full capacity of the
Revolver.
The Revolver bears interest at either prime rate or LIBOR plus an applicable
margin (5.5% at March 27, 2005) with interest payable monthly or as interest
rate contracts expire. The Term Loan bears interest at LIBOR plus an applicable
margin (7.5% at March 27, 2005) with interest payable as interest rate contacts
expire. Unused capacity under the Revolver bears interest at 0.5% and is payable
monthly. The Senior Credit Facility is secured by substantially all of our
assets and contains certain covenants that, among other things, limit the
payment of dividends, restrict additional indebtedness and obligations, and
require maintenance of certain financial ratios. As of March 27, 2005, we were
in compliance with all covenants.
As the
borrower under the Senior Credit Facility, our subsidiary, Medical Staffing
Network, Inc., may only pay dividends or make other distributions to us in the
amount of $500,000 in any fiscal year to pay our operating expenses. This
limitation on our subsidiary’s ability to distribute cash to us will limit our
ability to obtain and service any additional debt at the holding company level.
In addition, our subsidiary is subject to restrictions under the Senior Credit
Facility against incurring additional indebtedness.
For the
three months ended March 27, 2005, the weighted average interest rate for the
loans under the Senior Credit Facility was 7.2%. As of March 27, 2005, the
blended rate for loans outstanding under the Senior Credit Facility was
5.9%.
As of
March 27, 2005, $6.0 million was outstanding on the Term Loan and $25.0 million
was outstanding under the Revolver. As of March 27, 2005, an additional $17.7
million was immediately available for borrowing under the Revolver and we had
cash and cash equivalents of $0.5 million.
Capital
expenditures were $1.1 million for the three months ended March 27, 2005 and
$0.7 million for the comparable prior year period. The expenditures primarily
relate to the upgrade or replacement of various computer systems including
hardware, and purchased and internally developed software. We expect a similar
rate and type of capital expenditures on a going forward basis.
Because
we rely on cash flow from operations as a source of liquidity, we are subject to
the risk that a decrease in the demand for our staffing services could have an
adverse impact on our liquidity. Decreased demand for our staffing services
could result from an inability to attract qualified healthcare professionals,
fluctuations in patient occupancy at our hospital and healthcare facility
clients and changes in state and federal regulations relating to our business.
We
believe that our current cash balances, together with borrowing capacity under
the Senior Credit Facility and other available sources of liquidity, will be
sufficient for us to meet our current and future financial obligations, as well
as to provide us with funds for working capital, anticipated capital
expenditures and other needs for at least the next twelve months. No assurance
can be given, however, that this will be the case. In the longer term, we may
require additional equity and debt financing to meet our working capital needs,
or to fund our acquisition activities, if any. There can be no assurance that
additional financing will be available when required or, if available, will be
available on satisfactory terms.
Off-Balance
Sheet Arrangements
We have
no off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a
current or future effect on our financial condition, changes in financial
condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital
expenditures or capital resources that is material to our
investors.
Contractual
Obligations
The
following table reflects our significant contractual obligations and other
commitments as of December 26, 2004 (in thousands):
|
|
Payments
due by period |
|
|
|
|
|
Less
than |
|
2-3 |
|
4-5 |
|
After |
|
|
|
Total |
|
1
year |
|
years |
|
years |
|
5
years |
|
Long-term
debt obligations |
|
$ |
31,760 |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
31,760 |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
- |
|
Operating
leases |
|
|
17,377 |
|
|
4,753 |
|
|
5,432 |
|
|
2,591 |
|
|
4,601 |
|
Capital
lease obligations |
|
|
418 |
|
|
385 |
|
|
33 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
Total |
|
$ |
49,555 |
|
$ |
5,138 |
|
$ |
37,225 |
|
$ |
2,591 |
|
$ |
4,601 |
|
Long-term
debt obligations have decreased to $31.0 million as of March 27, 2005 since we
repaid $0.8 million during the first three months of 2005. No material changes
have occurred with regards to operating leases and capital lease obligations
since December 26, 2004.
Critical
Accounting Policies
In
response to the Security and Exchange Commission (SEC) Release Number 33-8040
“Cautionary Advice Regarding Disclosure About Critical Accounting Policies” and
SEC Release Number 33-8056, “Commission Statement about Management’s Discussion
and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” we have
identified the following critical accounting policies that affect the more
significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of the consolidated
financial statements. The preparation of the consolidated financial statements
in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States
requires that we make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts
of assets and liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosures of
contingent assets and liabilities. On an on-going basis, we will evaluate our
estimates, including those related to asset impairment, accruals for
self-insurance and compensation and related benefits, allowance for doubtful
accounts, and contingencies and litigation. These estimates are based on the
information that is currently available to us and on various other assumptions
that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results could
vary from those estimates under different assumptions or conditions. For a
summary of all our significant accounting policies, including the critical
accounting policies discussed below, see Note 1 to the consolidated financial
statements included in the Form 10-K for the year ended December 26,
2004.
We
believe that the following critical accounting policies affect the more
significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of our condensed
consolidated financial statements:
· |
We
maintain an allowance for doubtful accounts for estimated losses resulting
from the inability of our customers to make required payments, which
results in a provision for bad debt expense. The adequacy of this
allowance is determined by continually evaluating customer receivables,
considering the customers’ financial condition, credit history and current
economic conditions. If the financial condition of our customers were to
deteriorate, resulting in an impairment of their ability to make payments,
additional allowances would be required. |
· |
We
have recorded goodwill and other intangibles resulting from our
acquisitions through December 26, 2004. Through December 30, 2001,
goodwill and other intangibles were amortized on a straight-line basis
over their lives of 6 to 20 years. Pursuant to the provisions of SFAS No.
142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, which we adopted in 2002,
goodwill and intangible assets deemed to have an indefinite life are no
longer amortized. We evaluate the recovery of the carrying amount of costs
in excess of net tangible assets acquired by determining if an impairment
has occurred. This evaluation is done annually or more frequently if
indicators of an impairment arise. Indicators of an impairment include
duplication of resources resulting from acquisitions, instances in which
the estimated undiscounted cash flows of the entity are less than the
remaining unamortized balance of the underlying intangible assets and
other factors. At such time that impairment is determined, the intangible
assets are written off during that period. We are currently evaluating our
determination of operating segments, which could change the reporting unit
level at which we test for goodwill impairment. Any change in the
reporting unit level would occur in the future when we complete the
evaluation and could result in a noncash impairment charge to earnings,
based on the results of the testing performed. If we are required to
record an impairment charge in the future, it would have an adverse impact
on results of operations. |
· |
We
maintain an accrual for our health, workers compensation and professional
liability that are either self-insured or partially self-insured and are
classified in accounts payable and accrued expenses. The adequacy of these
accruals is determined by periodically evaluating our historical
experience and trends related to health, workers compensation, and
professional liability claims and payments, based on company-specific
actuarial computations and industry experience and trends. If such
information indicates that the accruals are overstated or understated, we
will adjust the assumptions utilized in the methodologies and reduce or
provide for additional accruals as
appropriate. |
· |
We
are subject to various claims and legal actions in the ordinary course of
our business. Some of these matters include professional liability and
employee-related matters. Hospital and healthcare facility clients may
also become subject to claims, governmental inquiries and investigations
and legal actions to which we may become a party relating to services
provided by our professionals. From time to time, and depending upon the
particular facts and circumstances, we may be subject to indemnification
obligations under our contracts with hospital and healthcare facility
clients relating to these matters. Although we are currently not aware of
any such pending or threatened litigation that we believe is reasonably
likely to have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or
results of operations, if we become aware of such claims against us, we
will evaluate the probability of an adverse outcome and provide accruals
for such contingencies as necessary. |
Caution
Concerning Forward-Looking Statements
The SEC
encourages companies to disclose forward-looking information so that investors
can better understand a company’s future prospects and make informed investment
decisions. This document contains such “forward-looking statements” within the
meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, particularly
statements anticipating future growth in revenues, operating income and cash
flow. Statements that are predictive in nature, that depend upon or refer to
future events or conditions or that include words such as “expects,”
“anticipates,” “intends,” “plans,” “believes,” “estimates,” and similar
expressions are forward-looking statements. These statements involve known and
unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause our actual results
and performance to be materially different from any future results or
performance expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements. These
factors include the following:
· |
Our
ability to attract and retain qualified nurses and other healthcare
personnel; |
· |
The
overall level of demand for services provided by temporary
nurses; |
· |
Our
ability to enter into contracts with hospital and healthcare facility
clients on terms attractive to us; |
· |
The
willingness of hospital and healthcare facility clients to utilize
temporary healthcare staffing services; |
· |
The
general level of patient occupancy at hospital and healthcare facility
clients; |
· |
The
functioning of our information systems; |
· |
The
effect of existing or future government regulation and federal and state
legislative and enforcement initiatives on our
business; |
· |
Our
clients’ ability to pay for services; |
· |
Our
ability to successfully implement our acquisition and integration
strategies; |
· |
The
effect of liabilities and other claims asserted against
us; |
· |
The
effect of competition in the markets we serve;
and |
· |
Our
ability to carry out our business strategy. |
Although
we believe that these statements are based upon reasonable assumptions, we
cannot guarantee future results. Given these uncertainties, the forward-looking
statements discussed herein might not occur.
Interest
Rate Risk
Our
exposure to interest rate risk arises principally from the variable rates
associated with our senior credit facility. On March 27, 2005, we had borrowings
of $31.0 million under our credit facility that were subject to variable rates,
with a blended rate of 5.9%. As of March 27, 2005, an adverse change of 1.0% in
the interest rate of all such borrowings outstanding would have caused us to
incur an increase in interest expense of approximately $0.3 million on an
annualized basis.
Foreign
Currency Risk
We have
no foreign currency risk as we have no revenue outside the United States and all
of our revenues are in U.S. dollars.
Inflation
We do not
believe that inflation has had a material effect on our results of operations in
recent years and periods. There can be no assurance, however, that we will not
be adversely affected by inflation in the future.
We
carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of
our management, including the Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief
Executive Officer, Robert J. Adamson, and Chief Financial Officer, N. Larry
McPherson, of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures, as
defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended. Based on that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures, as
of the end of the period covered by this report on Form 10-Q, were effective to
ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in reports that we file
or submit under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, is recorded,
processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the
Securities and Exchange Commission's rules and forms.
There
were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting or in other
factors that occurred during the last fiscal quarter that have materially
affected, or that are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal
control over financial reporting.
On
February 20, 2004, Joseph and Patricia Marrari, and on April 16, 2004, Tommie
Williams, filed class action lawsuits against Medical Staffing Network in the
United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida, on behalf of
themselves and purchasers of our common stock pursuant to or traceable to our
initial public offering in April 2002. These lawsuits also named as defendants
certain of our directors and executive officers (collectively with Medical
Staffing Network, the Defendants). The complaints allege that certain
disclosures in the Registration Statement/Prospectus filed in connection with
our initial public offering on April 17, 2002 were materially false and
misleading in violation of the Securities Act of 1933 (the Securities Act). The
complaints seek compensatory damages as well as costs and attorney fees.
On March
29, 2004, a third class action lawsuit brought on behalf of the same class of
our stockholders, making claims under the Securities Act similar to those in the
lawsuits filed by Plaintiffs Joseph and Patricia Marrari and Tommie Williams,
was commenced by Plaintiff Haddon Zia in the Florida Circuit Court of the
Fifteenth Judicial Circuit in and for Palm Beach County, Florida. Defendants
removed this case to the United States District Court for the Southern District
of Florida and Plaintiff moved to remand the case back to the Florida Circuit
Court of the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, which motion Defendants opposed. On
September 16, 2004 the federal district court entered an order granting
Plaintiff’s motion to remand. On January 6, 2005, the state court stayed the
state court proceedings until further order of the court. The Zia complaint
seeks rescission or damages as well as certain equitable relief and costs and
attorney fees.
On March
2, 2004, another class action complaint was filed against Medical Staffing
Network and certain of our directors and executive officers in the United States
District Court for the Southern District of Florida by Jerome Gould,
individually and on behalf of a class of Medical Staffing Network's stockholders
who purchased stock during the period from April 18, 2002 through June 16, 2003.
The complaint alleges that certain of our public disclosures during the class
period were materially false and misleading in violation of Section 10(b) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act), and Rule 10b-5 promulgated
thereunder. The complaint seeks compensatory damages, costs and attorney
fees.
On July
2, 2004, the Marrari, Gould, Williams and Zia actions were consolidated,
although, as noted above, the Zia action was subsequently remanded to state
court. Plaintiff Thomas Greene was appointed Lead Plaintiff of the consolidated
action and the law firm of Cauley Geller Bowman & Rudman LLP was appointed
Lead Counsel for Plaintiffs. On September 1, 2004, Lead Plaintiff filed his
consolidated amended class action complaint (the Complaint). The Complaint makes
allegations on behalf of a class consisting of purchasers of our common stock
pursuant to or traceable to our initial public offering in April 2002, for
purposes of the Securities Act claims, and on behalf of Medical Staffing
Network’s stockholders who purchased stock during the period from April 18, 2002
through June 16, 2003, for purposes of the Exchange Act claims. The Complaint
alleges that certain of our public disclosures during
the class
period were materially false and misleading in violation of Section 11 of the
Securities Act and Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act. The Complaint seeks
compensatory damages as well as costs and attorney fees. Defendants have filed a
motion to dismiss the Complaint.
We
believe that these lawsuits are without merit and we intend to defend ourselves
against them vigorously. Due to their preliminary status, we are unable to
predict the outcome of these lawsuits or reasonably estimate a range of possible
loss.
From time
to time, we are subject to lawsuits and claims that arise out of our operations
in the normal course of business. We are plaintiffs or defendants in various
litigation matters in the ordinary course of business, some of which involve
claims for damages that are substantial in amount. We believe that the
disposition of any claims that arise out of operations in the normal course of
business will not have a material adverse effect on our financial position or
results of operations.
The
following exhibits are included herewith:
31.1 |
Certification
of Robert J. Adamson, Chief Executive Officer of Medical Staffing Network
Holdings, Inc., as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002. |
31.2 |
Certification
of Larry McPherson, Chief Financial Officer of Medical Staffing Network
Holdings, Inc., as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002. |
32.1
|
Certification
of Robert J. Adamson, Chief Executive Officer of Medical Staffing Network
Holdings, Inc., pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
32.2
|
Certification
of Larry McPherson, Chief Financial Officer of Medical Staffing Network
Holdings, Inc., pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002. |
Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
MEDICAL
STAFFING NETWORK HOLDINGS, INC. |
Dated:
May 5, 2005 |
By:/s/
Robert J. Adamson |
|
Robert
J. Adamson |
|
Chairman
of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive
Officer |
Dated:
May 5, 2005 |
By:/s/
N. Larry McPherson |
|
N.
Larry McPherson |
|
Chief
Financial Officer |
Exhibit
No. |
Description |
31.1 |
Certification
of Robert J. Adamson, Chief Executive Officer of Medical Staffing Network
Holdings, Inc., as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002. |
31.2 |
Certification
of N. Larry McPherson, Chief Financial Officer of Medical Staffing Network
Holdings, Inc., as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002. |
32.1
|
Certification
of Robert J. Adamson, Chief Executive Officer of Medical Staffing Network
Holdings, Inc., pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
32.2 |
Certification
of N. Larry McPherson, Chief Financial Officer of Medical Staffing Network
Holdings, Inc., pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002. |