beyond our control, including general economic
conditions, availability of raw materials, energy costs, import duties, other trade restrictions and currency exchange rates.
We also rely on certain suppliers of coating
materials, lining materials and certain custom fabricated items. We have at least two suppliers for most of our raw materials. We believe our
relationships with our suppliers are positive and have no indication that we will experience shortages of raw materials or components essential to our
production processes or that we will be forced to seek alternative sources of supply. Any shortages of raw materials may result in production delays
and costs, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Employees
As of December 31, 2004, we had 1,091 full-time
employees. Approximately 25% were salaried and approximately 75% were employed on an hourly basis. A union represents all of the hourly employees at
our Monterrey, Mexico facility. All other employees are non-union. We consider our relations with our employees to be good.
Available Information
Our internet website address is www.nwpipe.com. Our
Annual Report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 are available through our internet website as soon as reasonably practical after we
electronically file such material with, or furnish it to, the Securities and Exchange Commission. Our internet website and the information contained
therein or connected thereto are not intended to be incorporated into this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Additionally, the public may read and copy any
materials the Company files with the SEC at the SEC’s Public Reference Room at 450 Fifth Street, N.W., Washington D.C. 20549. The public may
obtain information on the operation of the Public Reference Room by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. The SEC also maintains an Internet site that
contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC at
www.sec.gov.
Portland, Oregon The
Portland, Oregon facilities consist of approximately 300,000 square feet of covered manufacturing space located on approximately 25 acres. This
facility has the capability to manufacture water transmission and tubular products.
Atchison, Kansas The
Atchison, Kansas facility consists of approximately 60,000 square feet of covered manufacturing space located on approximately 40 acres. This facility
has the capability to manufacture tubular products.
Adelanto and Riverside,
California The Adelanto, California facility consists of approximately 85,000 square feet of covered manufacturing space
located on approximately 100 acres. This facility has the capability to manufacture water transmission products. The Riverside, California facility
consists of approximately 65 acres with approximately 46,100 square feet of covered manufacturing space and has the capability to manufacture water
transmission and tubular products. We are currently in the process of consolidating our Riverside facility with our Adelanto facility.
Denver, Colorado The
Denver, Colorado facility consists of approximately 157,000 square feet of covered manufacturing space located on approximately 40 acres. This facility
has the capability to manufacture water transmission products.
Bossier City,
Louisiana The Bossier City facility consists of approximately 138,500 square feet of covered manufacturing space located on
approximately 21 acres. This facility has the capability to manufacture tubular products.
Houston, Texas The
Houston, Texas facility consists of approximately 185,000 square feet of covered manufacturing space located on approximately 15 acres. This facility
has the capability to manufacture tubular products.
4
Parkersburg, West
Virginia The Parkersburg, West Virginia facility consists of approximately 134,000 square feet of covered manufacturing
space, located on approximately 93 acres. This facility has the capability to manufacture water transmission products.
Saginaw, Texas The
Saginaw, Texas facility consists of approximately 170,000 square feet of covered manufacturing space, located on approximately 26 acres at two
facilities. This facility has the capability to manufacture water transmission products.
Monterrey, Mexico The
Monterrey, Mexico facility consists of approximately 25,000 square feet of covered manufacturing space located on approximately five acres. We produce
propane tanks at this facility.
As of December 31, 2004, we owned all of our
facilities, except for one of our Saginaw, Texas facilities, which is under a long-term lease through 2008 and 2019, if all extensions are
exercised.
We have available manufacturing capacity from time
to time at each of our facilities. To take advantage of market opportunities, we may identify capital projects that will allow us to expand our
manufacturing facilities to meet expected growth opportunities.
| Item 3. |
|
Legal Proceedings |
We were a defendant in a suit brought by
Foothill/DeAnza Community College in U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California in July 2000. Two companies that we acquired in 1998
and subsequently merged into us were also named as defendants. DeAnza represented a class of plaintiffs who purchased small diameter, thin walled fire
sprinkler pipe sold as the “Poz-Lok” system that plaintiffs alleged was defectively manufactured and sold by the defendants between the early
1990s and early 2000. DeAnza alleged that the pipe leaked necessitating replacement of the fire sprinkler system and further alleged that the leaks
caused damage to other property as well as loss of use. We answered the complaint, denied liability and specifically denied that class certification
was appropriate. On July 1, 2002, the Court certified a class of facility owners in six states (California, Washington, Arizona, Oregon, Idaho and
Nevada), on claims of breach of express warranty, fraud and unfair trade practices. The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals denied our petition for review.
We filed a Declaratory Relief action against our insurers seeking defense and indemnification. We also filed an action against the former owner of the
two companies we acquired in 1998, seeking damages for fees and indemnification. We have settled with the plaintiffs, the insurance companies, and the
former owner. Following a hearing on June 7, 2004, the Court entered a final order and judgment, which approved a nationwide opt-out class. The 30-day
appeal period expired on July 7, 2004, and no one appealed. Pursuant to the settlement, we are obligated to pay only those class members who had an
actual qualifying leak in their Poz-Lok systems, supported by documentation of the leak and those who have a qualifying leak in the future, again,
supported by documentation, as well as an inspection report verifying the existence of the leak and lack of alternative cause, such as misuse, improper
installation, or microbiologically influenced corrosion (“MIC”). Class members may make a claim during a fifteen year period measured from
the final effective date of the settlement (July 7, 2004), but any compensation for the leak, between $10 and $30 per foot of necessary pipe to
effectuate repair and any consequential damages, would be reduced on a proportionate basis measured from the date such system was installed.
Alternatively, the class member could receive $500 and receive no further compensation. Our insurance carriers have paid $5.0 million to cover the
initial costs of settlement administration, class notice costs and plaintiff’s attorney fees, with an estimated $2.4 million remaining to pay
claims. Our payment obligations do not begin until the insurance funds are exhausted. During the second year and years four through fifteen, we would
be obligated only to pay qualifying claims and administrative costs up to a limit of $500,000 per year. We have no payment obligations in years one and
three. We also would have no payment obligation in any other year in which there are no qualifying claims. In the event any qualifying claims remain
unpaid after fifteen years, we would have to pay such claims as follows: (1) if the excess claims are between $0 and $1.5 million, we would pay the
amount of the claims; (2) if the excess claims are between $1.5 million and $6.0 million, we would pay $1.5 million; and (3) if the excess claims
exceed $6.0 million, we would pay $1.5 million plus 25 percent of the amount over $6.0 million, up to a cap of $3.0 million; provided, that in no event
would we be obligated to pay any more than $1.0 million in any of years sixteen, seventeen or eighteen. To date, we are aware of seven claims, one of
which has been denied and six of which are pending. Of the six pending claims, one seeks an inspection to determine the extent of any leaks, and the
remaining claims have a total maximum exposure of less than $100,000.
Our manufacturing facilities are subject to many
federal, state, local and foreign laws and regulations related to the protection of the environment. Some of our operations require environmental
permits to control and reduce
5
air and water discharges or manage other
environmental matters, which are subject to modification, renewal and revocation by government authorities. We believe that we are in material
compliance with all environmental laws, regulations and permits, and we do not anticipate any material expenditures to meet current or pending
environmental requirements. However, we could incur operating costs or capital expenditures in complying with future or more stringent environmental
requirements or with current requirements if they are applied to our facilities in a way we do not anticipate.
In November 1999, the Oregon Department of
Environmental Quality (DEQ) requested that we perform a preliminary assessment of our plant located at 12005 N. Burgard in Portland, Oregon. The
primary purpose of the assessment is to determine whether the plant has contributed to sediment contamination in the Willamette River. We entered into
a voluntary letter agreement with the department in mid-August 2000. In 2001, groundwater containing elevated volatile organic compounds (VOCs) was
identified in one localized area of the property furthest from the river. Assessment work in 2002 and 2003 to further characterize the groundwater is
consistent with the initial conclusion that the source of the VOCs is located off site. There is no evidence at this time showing a connection between
detected VOCs in groundwater and Willamette River sediments. Also, there is no evidence to date that stormwater from the plant has adversely impacted
Willamette River sediments. However, DEQ is recommending a remedial investigation and feasibility study for further evaluation of both groundwater and
stormwater at the plant. Assessment work is ongoing.
In December 2000, a six-mile section of the lower
Willamette River known as the Portland Harbor was included on the National Priorities List at the request of the EPA. The EPA currently describes the
site as the areal extent of contamination, and all suitable areas in proximity to the contamination necessary for the implementation of the response
action, at, from and to the Portland Harbor Superfund Site Assessment Area from approximately River Mile 3.5 to River Mile 9.2, including uplands
portions of the site that contain sources of contamination to the sediments. Our plant is not located on the Willamette River; it lies in what may be
the upland portion of the site. However, a final determination of the areal extent of the site will not be determined until EPA issues a record of
decision describing the remedial action necessary to address Willamette River sediments. EPA and the Oregon Department of Environmental Quality have
agreed to share responsibility for investigation and cleanup of the site. The Oregon Department of Environmental Quality has the lead responsibility
for conducting the upland work, and EPA is the Support Agency for that work. EPA has the lead responsibility for conducting in-water work, and the
Oregon Department of Environmental Quality is the Support Agency for that work.
Also, in December 2000, EPA notified us and 68 other
parties by general notice letter of potential liability under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act and the Resource
Conservation and Recovery Act with respect to the Portland Harbor Superfund Site. In its letter, EPA inquired whether parties receiving the letter were
interested in volunteering to enter negotiations to perform a remedial investigation and feasibility study at the site. No action was required by EPA
of recipients of the general notice letter. In the last week of December 2000, we responded to EPA’s inquiry stating that we were working with the
Oregon Department of Environmental Quality to determine whether our plant had any impact on Willamette River sediments or was a current source of
releases to the Willamette River sediments. Therefore, until our work with the Oregon Department of Environmental Quality is completed, it would be
premature for us to enter into any negotiations with EPA.
We operate under numerous governmental permits and
licenses relating to air emissions, stormwater run-off, and other matters. We are not aware of any current material violations or citations relating to
any of these permits or licenses. We have a policy of reducing consumption of hazardous materials in our operations by substituting non-hazardous
materials when possible. Our operations are also governed by many other laws and regulations, including those relating to workplace safety and worker
health, principally the Occupational Safety and Health Act and regulations thereunder which, among other requirements, establish noise and dust
standards. We believe that we are in material compliance with these laws and regulations and do not believe that future compliance with such laws and
regulations will have a material adverse effect on our results of operations or financial condition.
From time to time, we are involved in litigation
relating to claims arising out of our operations in the normal course of our business. We maintain insurance coverage against potential claims in
amounts that we believe to be adequate. Management believes that we are not presently a party to any other litigation, the outcome of which would have
a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.
| Item 4. |
|
Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security
Holders |
No matters were submitted to a vote of our
shareholders during the quarter ended December 31, 2004.
6
PART II
| Item 5. |
|
Market for the Registrant’s Common Equity, Related
Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities |
Our common stock is quoted on the Nasdaq National
Market System under the symbol “NWPX.” The high and low sales prices as reported on the Nasdaq National Market System for each quarter in the
years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003 were as follows.
|
|
|
|
Low
|
|
High
|
2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First
Quarter |
|
|
|
$ |
13.55 |
|
|
$ |
15.19 |
|
Second
Quarter |
|
|
|
|
13.81 |
|
|
|
17.98 |
|
Third
Quarter |
|
|
|
|
16.54 |
|
|
|
18.00 |
|
Fourth
Quarter |
|
|
|
|
16.52 |
|
|
|
24.95 |
|
|
2003
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First
Quarter |
|
|
|
$ |
11.66 |
|
|
$ |
17.50 |
|
Second
Quarter |
|
|
|
|
8.26 |
|
|
|
14.52 |
|
Third
Quarter |
|
|
|
|
12.75 |
|
|
|
16.55 |
|
Fourth
Quarter |
|
|
|
|
11.85 |
|
|
|
15.03 |
|
There were 83 shareholders of record and
approximately 1,350 beneficial shareholders at March 2, 2005. There were no cash dividends declared or paid in fiscal years 2004 or 2003. We do not
anticipate paying cash dividends in the foreseeable future.
Information with respect to equity compensation
plans is included under the caption “Equity Compensation Plan Information” in Northwest Pipe’s definitive proxy statement for its 2005
Annual Meeting of Shareholders and is incorporated by reference herein.
| Item 6. |
|
Selected Financial Data |
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004
|
|
2003
|
|
2002
|
|
2001
|
|
2000
|
|
|
|
|
In thousands, except per share amount
|
|
Consolidated Statement of Income Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
sales |
|
|
|
$ |
291,910 |
|
|
$ |
244,987 |
|
|
$ |
266,101 |
|
|
$ |
276,473 |
|
|
$ |
281,409 |
|
Gross
profit |
|
|
|
|
49,296 |
|
|
|
33,228 |
|
|
|
43,929 |
|
|
|
51,402 |
|
|
|
49,217 |
|
Net
income |
|
|
|
|
12,377 |
|
|
|
3,531 |
|
|
|
9,259 |
|
|
|
11,111 |
|
|
|
10,691 |
|
Basic
earnings per share |
|
|
|
|
1.87 |
|
|
|
0.54 |
|
|
|
1.42 |
|
|
|
1.71 |
|
|
|
1.65 |
|
Diluted
earnings per share |
|
|
|
|
1.83 |
|
|
|
0.53 |
|
|
|
1.37 |
|
|
|
1.67 |
|
|
|
1.62 |
|
|
Consolidated Balance Sheet Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Working
capital |
|
|
|
$ |
97,932 |
|
|
$ |
71,023 |
|
|
$ |
117,879 |
|
|
$ |
118,273 |
|
|
$ |
75,760 |
|
Total
assets |
|
|
|
|
335,403 |
|
|
|
280,010 |
|
|
|
286,732 |
|
|
|
266,582 |
|
|
|
283,157 |
|
Long-term
debt, less current portion |
|
|
|
|
59,689 |
|
|
|
35,914 |
|
|
|
75,664 |
|
|
|
59,009 |
|
|
|
70,841 |
|
Stockholders’ equity |
|
|
|
|
144,152 |
|
|
|
131,651 |
|
|
|
127,152 |
|
|
|
118,245 |
|
|
|
107,849 |
|
7
| Item 7. |
|
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations |
Forward-Looking Statements
This Management’s Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations and other sections of this Report contain forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Securities
Litigation Reform Act of 1995 that are based on current expectations, estimates and projections about our business, management’s beliefs, and
assumptions made by management. Words such as “expects,” “anticipates,” “intends,” “plans,”
“believes,” “seeks,” “estimates,” “should,” and variations of such words and similar expressions are intended
to identify such forward-looking statements. These statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve risks and uncertainties that are
difficult to predict. Therefore, actual outcomes and results may differ materially from what is expressed or forecasted in such forward-looking
statements due to numerous factors including changes in demand for our products, product mix, bidding activity, the timing of customer orders and
deliveries, the price and availability of raw materials, excess or shortage of production capacity, international trade policy and regulations and
other risks discussed below under the caption “risk factors” and from time to time in our other Securities and Exchange Commission filings
and reports. In addition, such statements could be affected by general industry and market conditions and growth rates, and general domestic and
international economic conditions. Such forward-looking statements speak only as of the date on which they are made and we do not undertake any
obligation to update any forward-looking statement to reflect events or circumstances after the date of this Report. If we do update or correct one or
more forward-looking statements, investors and others should not conclude that we will make additional updates or corrections with respect thereto or
with respect to other forward-looking statements.
Overview
Our water transmission products are manufactured in
our Portland, Oregon; Denver, Colorado; Adelanto and Riverside, California; Parkersburg, West Virginia; and Saginaw, Texas facilities. Tubular products
are manufactured in our Portland, Oregon; Atchison, Kansas; Houston, Texas; Bossier City, Louisiana; and Monterrey, Mexico facilities.
We believe that the Tubular Products business, in
conjunction with the Water Transmission business, provide a significant degree of market diversification, because the principal factors affecting
demand for Water Transmission products are different from those affecting demand for Tubular Products. Demand for water transmission products is
generally based on population growth and movement, changing water sources and replacement of aging infrastructure. Demand can vary dramatically within
our market area since each population center determines its own waterworks requirements. Demand for tubular products is influenced by construction
activity and general economic conditions.
Critical Accounting Policies
The discussion and analysis of our financial
condition and results of operations are based upon our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States.
Management Estimates:
The preparation of our financial statements requires
us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent
assets and liabilities. On an on-going basis, we evaluate all of our estimates, including those related to revenue recognition and allowance for
doubtful accounts. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the
circumstances. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. We believe the following critical accounting
policies and related judgments and estimates affect the preparation of our consolidated financial statements.
Revenue Recognition:
Revenue from construction contracts in our water
transmission segment is recognized on the percentage-of-completion method, measured by the percentage of total costs incurred to date to the estimated
total costs of each contract. Estimated total costs of each contract are reviewed on a monthly basis by project management and
8
operations personnel for all projects that are
fifty percent or more complete except that major projects, usually over $5.0 million, are reviewed earlier if sufficient production has been completed
to provide enough information to revise the original estimated total cost of the project. All cost revisions that result in the gross profit as a
percent of sales increasing or decreasing by greater than one percent are reviewed by senior management personnel. Contract costs include all direct
material and labor costs and those indirect costs related to contract performance, such as indirect labor, supplies, tools, repairs and depreciation.
Selling, general and administrative costs are charged to expense as incurred. Provisions for losses on uncompleted contracts are made in the period
such losses are known. Changes in job performance, job conditions and estimated profitability, including those arising from contract penalty provisions
and final contract settlements may result in revisions to costs and income and are recognized in the period in which the revisions are determined.
Historically, actual results have been within management’s estimates. Management has discussed the development and selection of this critical
accounting estimate with the audit committee of our board of directors.
Revenue from our tubular products segment is
recognized when all four of the following criteria have been satisfied: persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists; delivery has occurred; the price
is fixed or determinable; and collectibility is reasonably assured.
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts:
We maintain allowances for estimated losses
resulting from the inability of our customers to make required payments and from contract disputes. The extension and revision of credit is established
by obtaining credit rating reports or financial information of a potential customer. Trade receivable balances are evaluated at least monthly. If it is
determined that the customer will be unable to meet its financial obligation to us as a result of a bankruptcy filing, deterioration in the
customer’s financial position, contract dispute, product claim or other similar events, a specific allowance is recorded to reduce the related
receivable to the expected recovery amount given all information presently available. A general allowance is recorded for all other customers based on
certain other factors including the length of time the receivables are past due and historical collection experience with individual customers. As of
December 31, 2004, the accounts receivable balance of $53.9 million is reported net of allowances for doubtful accounts of $1.2 million. We believe the
reported allowances at December 31, 2004, are adequate. If the customers’ financial conditions were to deteriorate resulting in their inability to
make payments, additional allowances may need to be recorded, which would result in additional selling, general and administrative expenses being
recorded for the period in which such determination was made. Historically, actual results have been within management’s estimates. Management has
discussed the development and selection of this critical accounting estimate with the audit committee of our board of directors.
Long-Lived Assets:
Property and equipment are reviewed for impairment
in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (“SFAS”) No. 144, “Accounting for the Disposal of Long-Lived Assets.”
We assess impairment of property and equipment whenever changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying values of the assets may not be
recoverable.
Goodwill represents the excess of cost over the
assigned value of the net assets in connection with all acquisitions. Goodwill is reviewed for impairment in accordance with SFAS No. 142
“Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets.” SFAS 142 requires that goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite lives are no longer amortized
but are reviewed for impairment annually, or more frequently if impairment indicators arise. As required under SFAS 142, we performed our annual
assessment for impairment of the goodwill as of December 31, 2004; based on our analysis, we believe no impairment of goodwill exists.
If we determine that the carrying value of the
property and equipment or goodwill will not be recoverable, we calculate and record impairment losses using future undiscounted cash flows. We estimate
future undiscounted cash flows using assumptions about the expected future operating performance of the Company. Our estimates of undiscounted cash
flows may differ from actual cash flow due to, among other things, technological changes, economic conditions, or changes to our business
operations.
Inventories:
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or
market. Finished goods are stated at standard cost, which approximates the first-in, first-out method of accounting. Raw material inventories of steel
coil are stated at cost on a specific identification basis or at standard cost. Raw material inventories of coating and lining materials, as well as
materials and supplies, are stated on an average cost basis.
9
Income Taxes:
We record deferred income tax assets and liabilities
based upon the difference between the financial statement and income tax bases of assets and liabilities using enacted income tax rates. Valuation
allowances are established when necessary to reduce deferred income tax assets to the amount expected to be realized. Income tax expense is the tax
payable for the period and the change during the period in net deferred income tax assets and liabilities.
Self Insurance:
We are self-insured for health claims for certain
employees. In addition, we are self-insured for a portion of losses and liabilities associated with workers compensation claims. Losses are accrued
based upon our estimates of the aggregate liability for claims incurred using historical experience and, for workers compensation, certain actuarial
assumptions followed in the insurance industry. The Company has purchased stop-loss coverage in order to limit, to the extent feasible, the aggregate
exposure to claims. There is no assurance that such coverage will adequately protect the Company against liability from all potential
consequences.
Pension Benefits:
We have two defined benefit pension plans that are
frozen. We fund these plans to cover current plan costs plus amortization of the unfunded plan liabilities. To record these obligations, management
uses estimates relating to assumed inflation, investment returns, mortality, employee turnover, and discount rates. Management, along with third-party
actuaries, reviews all of these assumptions on an ongoing basis.
Results of Operations
The following table sets forth, for the periods
indicated, certain financial information regarding costs and expenses expressed as a percentage of total net sales and net sales of our business
segments.
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004
|
|
2003
|
|
2002
|
Net
sales:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Water
transmission |
|
|
|
|
60.9 |
% |
|
|
59.7 |
% |
|
|
65.6 |
% |
Tubular
products |
|
|
|
|
39.1 |
|
|
|
40.3 |
|
|
|
34.4 |
|
Total net
sales |
|
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
Cost of
sales |
|
|
|
|
83.1 |
|
|
|
86.4 |
|
|
|
83.5 |
|
Gross
profit |
|
|
|
|
16.9 |
|
|
|
13.6 |
|
|
|
16.5 |
|
Selling,
general and administrative expenses |
|
|
|
|
7.9 |
|
|
|
9.1 |
|
|
|
8.7 |
|
Operating
income |
|
|
|
|
9.0 |
|
|
|
4.5 |
|
|
|
7.8 |
|
Interest
expense, net |
|
|
|
|
2.2 |
|
|
|
2.2 |
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
Income before
income taxes |
|
|
|
|
6.8 |
|
|
|
2.3 |
|
|
|
5.7 |
|
Provision for
income taxes |
|
|
|
|
2.6 |
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
2.2 |
|
Net
income |
|
|
|
|
4.2 |
% |
|
|
1.4 |
% |
|
|
3.5 |
% |
|
Segment
gross profit as a percentage of net sales:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Water
transmission |
|
|
|
|
19.0 |
% |
|
|
22.0 |
% |
|
|
22.0 |
% |
Tubular
products |
|
|
|
|
13.5 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
6.1 |
|
Year Ended December 31, 2004 Compared to Year Ended December 31,
2003
Net sales. Net
sales increased to $291.9 million in 2004 from $245.0 million in 2003. No single customer accounted for 10% or more of total net sales in 2004 or
2003.
Water Transmission sales increased 21.5% to $177.8
million in 2004 from $146.3 million in 2003. Net sales increased over the same period last year as a result of increased volume, which is attributable
to stronger demand. Our Water Transmission business is impacted by infrastructure improvements; as municipal water agencies initiate improvements, we
generally experience an increase in demand for our products. In addition to increased sales, the stronger demand resulted in an improved backlog at
December 31, 2004 of $128.9, as compared to the backlog
10
of $73.8 million at the beginning of 2004.
Bidding activity, backlog and sales resulting from the award of new projects, or the production of current projects, may vary significantly from period
to period.
Tubular Products sales increased 15.7% to $114.1
million in 2004 from $98.7 million in 2003. The increase in net sales over the same period last year resulted primarily from our ability to pass on
steel price increases to our customers. During 2004, we raised prices on our Tubular Products in order to pass along to our customers the steel
surcharges and base price increases our steel vendors have included on steel purchased by us. These price increases are designed to absorb the increase
in the cost of steel, our principal raw material. The timing and the extent to which our future prices may be adjusted because of fluctuations in the
steel marketplace are uncertain; therefore, no assurance can be given that we will succeed in maintaining similar growth in 2005.
Gross
profit. Gross profit increased to $49.3 million (16.9% of total net sales) in 2004 from $33.2 million (13.6% of total
net sales) in 2003.
Water Transmission gross profit increased 5.3% to
$33.9 million (19.0% of segment net sales) in 2004 from $32.2 million (22.0% of segment net sales) in 2003. Our Water Transmission projects are
obtained primarily through competitive bidding, which often occurs three to six months in advance of production of the projects. At the time of the
bidding, we attempt to accurately estimate the future price of steel that will be purchased for the project and include that in our bid. Our Water
Transmission gross margin percentage decreased from the same period last year primarily because we experienced significant increases in the price per
ton and the surcharges on steel, which comprises the majority of our cost of goods sold. As this significant component of our cost of sales increases,
our gross margin percentage is necessarily driven down, even if all steel cost increases are passed along to our customers. To some extent, our Water
Transmission gross profit also decreased because we did not fully anticipate nor include in our project bidding the full amount of the increase in the
cost of steel early in the year. Gross profit, however, as a percent of segment net sales is expected to improve in the first part of 2005 as our
production continues to be strong and we are able to take advantage of higher plant utilization, which will drive down our remaining costs of goods
sold.
Gross profit from Tubular Products increased
significantly to $15.4 million (13.5% of segment net sales) in 2004 from $1.1 million (1.1% of segment net sales) in 2003. Tubular Products gross
profit increased over the same period last year primarily as a result of the elimination of sales of low margin products and the sale of generally
lower costing inventory at higher selling prices charged by the Company in response to increasing steel costs. As steel price increases begin to
moderate, our margins should stabilize in the low double digit range.
Selling, general and administrative
expenses. Selling, general and administrative expenses increased 3.7% to $23.1 million (7.9% of total net sales) in 2004
from $22.3 million (9.1% of total net sales) in 2003. The increase was primarily the result of an increase in incentive compensation and professional
fees incurred to meet Sarbanes-Oxley compliance requirements.
Interest
expense. Interest expense increased to $6.3 million in 2004 from $5.2 million in 2003. The increase in interest expense
resulted from an increase in both our outstanding borrowings and the rates on those borrowings.
Income
taxes. Our effective tax rate was approximately 37.6% in 2004 and 38.3% in 2003.
Year Ended December 31, 2003 Compared to Year Ended December 31,
2002
Net sales. Net
sales decreased to $245.0 million in 2003 from $266.1 million in 2002. No single customer accounted for 10% or more of total net sales in 2003 or
2002.
Water Transmission sales decreased 16.2% to $146.3
million in 2003 from $174.5 million in 2002. The decrease was primarily a result of lower production levels that resulted from the combination of a low
backlog at the beginning of the year, limited bidding activity through the majority of the first half of the year, and delays in obtaining approval
from customers to produce projects in our backlog.
Tubular Products sales increased 7.8% to $98.7
million in 2003 from $91.6 million in 2002. The increase was primarily the result of improvements in the energy market.
Gross
profit. Gross profit decreased to $33.2 million (13.6% of total net sales) in 2003 from $43.9 million (16.5% of total
net sales) in 2002.
11
Water Transmission gross profit decreased 16.1% to
$32.2 million (22.0% of segment net sales) in 2003 from $38.4 million (22.0% of segment net sales) in 2002. Water Transmission gross profit decreased
as a result of lower volume. Increased competition lowered the overall margins on jobs booked in 2003 and the low production utilization resulted in
higher production costs in the first half of 2003. Even though overall bidding activity improved in the second half of the year and our bookings
increased, the continued unevenness of the bidding activity in the second half of 2003 resulted in less than optimal utilization of plant
capacity.
Gross profit from Tubular Products decreased
significantly to $1.1 million (1.1% of segment net sales) in 2003 from $5.5 million (6.1% of segment net sales) in 2002. Tubular Products gross profit
decreased in 2003 as a result of the inability to fully pass on steel price increases to our customers during the year. Import pricing pressures and
relatively low demand in our key markets kept prices of our products at lower levels than we had historically seen in relation to steel
costs.
Selling, general and administrative
expenses. Selling, general and administrative expenses decreased 3.7% to $22.3 million (9.1% of total net sales) in 2003
from $23.1 million (8.7% of total net sales) in 2002. The decrease was primarily the result of reduction in wages.
Interest
expense. Interest expense decreased to $5.2 million in 2003 from $5.5 million in 2002. The decrease in interest expense
resulted from a lower aggregate interest rate.
Income
taxes. Our effective tax rate was approximately 38.3% in 2003 and 39.2% in 2002.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
We generally finance our operations through cash
flows from operations and available borrowings. At December 31, 2004, we had cash and cash equivalents of $89,000 and available borrowings of $10.1
million.
Net cash used in operating activities in 2004 was
$10.3 million. This was primarily the result of an increase in cost and estimated earnings in excess of billings on uncompleted contracts, inventories,
and trade and other receivables, net of $28.4, $17.0 and $5.3 million, respectively; offset in part by our net income of $12.4 million, an increase in
accounts payable of $20.1 million, and non-cash adjustments for depreciation and amortization of $6.3 million. The increase in cost and estimated
earnings in excess of billings on uncompleted contracts, inventories and trade receivables resulted primarily from the increased production in the
Water Transmission segment of our business and the high cost of steel. The increase in accounts payable can also be attributed to the increased
production, which required additional receipts of steel and other raw materials.
Net cash used in investing activities in 2004 was
$12.0 million, which primarily related to additions of property and equipment. Capital expenditures are expected to be between $9.0 and $11.0 million
in 2005.
Net cash provided by financing activities in 2004
was $22.2 million, which primarily resulted from net new borrowings under our long-term debt agreement.
We had the following significant components of debt
at December 31, 2004: a $38.5 million credit agreement, under which $28.4 million was outstanding; $1.4 million of Series A Senior Notes; $17.1 million
of Series B Senior Notes; $15.0 million of Senior Notes; $15.0 million of Series A Term Note, $10.5 million of Series B Term Notes, $10.0 million of
Series C Term Notes, an Industrial Development Bond of $1.5 million; and capital lease obligations of $905,000.
The credit agreement expires on December 31, 2006.
The balance outstanding under the credit agreement bears interest at rates related to LIBOR plus 2.25% to 3.50% (5.75% at December 31, 2004), or at
prime minus 0.25% to prime plus 1.00% (6.00% at December 31, 2004). We had $28.4 million outstanding under the line of credit, with $10.3 million
bearing interest at 6.00% and $20.0 million bearing interest at 5.625%, partially offset by $1.9 million in cash receipts that had not been applied to
the loan balance. At December 31, 2004 we had an additional net borrowing capacity under the line of credit of $10.1 million.
The Series A Term Note in the principal amount of
$15.0 million matures on February 25, 2014 and requires annual payments in the amount of $2.1 million that begin February 25, 2008 plus interest of
8.75% paid quarterly on February 25, May 25, August 25 and November 25. The Series B Term Notes in the principal amount of $10.5 million mature on June
21, 2014 and require annual payments in the amount of $1.5 million that begin June 21,
12
2008 plus interest of 8.47% paid quarterly on
March 21, June 21, September 21 and December 21. The Series C Term Notes in the principal amount of $10.0 million mature on October 26, 2014 and
require annual payments of $1.4 million that begin October 26, 2008 plus interest of 7.36% paid quarterly on January 26, April 26, July 26 and October
26. The Series A Senior Notes in the principal amount of $1.4 million mature on April 1, 2005 and require annual payments in the amount of $1.4 million
that began April 1, 1999 plus interest at 6.63% paid quarterly on January 1, April 1, July 1 and October 1. The Series B Senior Notes in the principal
amount of $17.1 million mature on April 1, 2008 and require annual payments of $4.3 million that began April 1, 2003 plus interest at 6.91% paid
quarterly on January 1, April 1, July 1 and October 1. The Senior Notes in the principal amount of $15.0 million mature on November 15, 2007 and
require annual payments in the amount of $5.0 million that began November 15, 2001 plus interest of 6.87% paid quarterly on February 15, May 15, August
15, and November 15. The Senior Notes, Series A Senior Notes and Series B Senior Notes (together, the “Notes”) also include supplemental
interest from 0.0% to 1.5% (0.75% at December 31, 2004), based on our total minimum net earnings before tax plus interest expense (net of capitalized
interest expense), depreciation expense and amortization expense (“EBITDA”) to total debt leverage ratio, which is paid with the required
quarterly interest payments. The Notes, the Series A Term Note, the Series B Term Notes, and Series C Term Notes (together, the “Term Notes”)
and the credit agreement are collateralized by all accounts receivable, inventory and certain equipment.
The Industrial Development Bond matures on April 15,
2010 and requires annual principal payments of $250,000 and monthly interest payments. The interest rate on the Industrial Development Bond is
variable. It was 2.15% as of December 31, 2004 as compared to 1.35% on December 31, 2003. The Bond is collateralized by property and equipment and
guaranteed by an irrevocable letter of credit.
We lease certain hardware and software related to a
company-wide enterprise resource planning system and other equipment. The aggregated interest rate on the capital leases is 7.7%.
We have operating leases with respect to certain
manufacturing equipment that require us to pay property taxes, insurance and maintenance. Under the terms of certain operating leases, we sold
equipment to an unrelated third party (the “lessor”) who then leased the equipment to us. These leases, along with other debt instruments
already in place, and our credit agreement, best met our near term financing and operating capital requirements compared to other available options at
the time they were entered into.
Certain of our operating lease agreements include
renewals and/or purchase options set to expire at various dates. In addition, certain of our operating lease agreements, primarily manufacturing
equipment leases, with terms of 3 years, contain provisions related to residual value guarantees, which provide that if we do not purchase the leased
equipment from the lessor at the end of the lease term, then we are liable to the lessor for an amount equal to the shortage (if any) between the
proceeds from the sale of the equipment and an agreed value. The maximum potential liability to us under such guarantees is $20.5 million at December
31, 2004 if the proceeds from the sale of terminating equipment leases are zero. Consistent with past experience, management does not expect any
significant payments will be required pursuant to these guarantees, and no amounts have been accrued at December 31, 2004.
The following table sets forth our commitments under
the terms of our debt obligations and operating leases:
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
2005
|
|
2006/2007
|
|
2008/2009
|
|
Thereafter
|
Credit
Agreement (1) |
|
|
|
$ |
28,412 |
|
|
$ |
28,412 |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
The
Notes |
|
|
|
|
33,571 |
|
|
|
10,714 |
|
|
|
18,572 |
|
|
|
4,285 |
|
|
|
— |
|
The Term
Notes |
|
|
|
|
35,500 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
10,142 |
|
|
|
25,358 |
|
Industrial
Development Bond |
|
|
|
|
1,500 |
|
|
|
250 |
|
|
|
500 |
|
|
|
500 |
|
|
|
250 |
|
Capital
Leases |
|
|
|
|
905 |
|
|
|
823 |
|
|
|
82 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
Operating
Leases |
|
|
|
|
21,886 |
|
|
|
7,929 |
|
|
|
11,115 |
|
|
|
2,554 |
|
|
|
288 |
|
Total
Obligations |
|
|
|
$ |
121,774 |
|
|
$ |
48,128 |
|
|
$ |
30,269 |
|
|
$ |
17,481 |
|
|
$ |
25,896 |
|
| (1) |
|
Although the Credit Agreement expires on December 31, 2006, we
have included the amount as current due to the subjective acceleration clause included in the Agreement. |
13
We also have entered into stand-by letters of credit
that total approximately $5.3 million as of December 31, 2004. The stand-by letters of credit relate to workers’ compensation, general liability
insurance, and our Industrial Revenue Bond. Due to the nature of these arrangements and our historical experience, we do not expect to make any
significant payments under these arrangements. Therefore, they have been excluded from our aggregate commitments identified above.
The credit agreement, the Notes, the Term Notes and
operating leases all require compliance with the following financial covenants: minimum consolidated tangible net worth; maximum consolidated total
debt to consolidated EBITDA; minimum consolidated fixed charge coverage test and a limitation on credit agreement borrowings based on a borrowing base
formula that includes a certain portion of our accounts receivable, inventory and property and equipment. These and other covenants included in our
financing agreements impose certain requirements with respect to our financial condition and results of operations, and place restrictions on, among
other things, our ability to incur certain additional indebtedness, to create liens or other encumbrances on assets and capital expenditures. A failure
by us to comply with the requirements of these covenants, if not waived or cured, could permit acceleration of the related indebtedness and
acceleration of indebtedness under other instruments that include cross-acceleration or cross-default provisions. At December 31, 2004, we were not in
violation of any of the covenants in our debt agreements.
We expect to continue to rely on cash generated from
operations and other sources of available funds to make required principal payments under the Notes during 2005. We anticipate that our existing cash
and cash equivalents, cash flows expected to be generated by operations and amounts available under our credit agreement will be adequate to fund our
working capital and capital requirements for at least the next twelve months. To the extent necessary, we may also satisfy capital requirements through
additional bank borrowings, senior notes, term notes and capital and operating leases, if such resources are available on satisfactory terms. We have
from time to time evaluated and continue to evaluate opportunities for acquisitions and expansion. Any such transactions, if consummated, may use a
portion of our working capital or necessitate additional bank borrowings.
Related Party Transactions.
We have ongoing business relationships with certain
affiliates of Wells Fargo & Company (“Wells Fargo”). Wells Fargo, together with certain of its affiliates, is our largest shareholder.
During the year ended December 31, 2004, we made the following payments to affiliates of Wells Fargo: (i) capital and operating lease payments pursuant
to which the Company leases certain equipment from such affiliates, (ii) payments of interest and fees pursuant to letters of credit originated by such
affiliates, (iii) payments of principal and interest on an industrial development bond, and (iv) payments of principal, interest and related fees in
connection with loan agreements between the Company and such affiliates. Payments made by us to Wells Fargo and its affiliates amounted to $3.5
million, $3.9 million and $2.0 million for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively. Balances due to Wells Fargo and its
affiliates were $30.9 million and $33.1 million at December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements.
In November 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 151,
“Inventory Costs—An Amendment of ARB No. 43, Chapter 4” (“SFAS 151”). SFAS 151 amends the guidance in ARB No. 43, Chapter 4,
“Inventory Pricing,” to clarify the accounting for abnormal amounts of idle facility expense, freight, handling costs, and wasted material
(spoilage). Among other provisions, the new rule requires that items such as idle facility expense, excessive spoilage, double freight, and rehandling
costs be recognized as current-period charges regardless of whether they meet the criterion of “so abnormal” as stated in ARB No. 43.
Additionally, SFAS 151 requires that the allocation of fixed production overhead to the costs of conversion be based on the normal capacity of the
production facilities. SFAS 151 is effective for fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2005. We are currently evaluating the effect that the adoption
of SFAS 151 will have on our results of operations or financial position, but do not expect SFAS 151 to have a material effect.
In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 153,
“Exchanges of Nonmonetary Assets—An Amendment of APB Opinion No. 29, Accounting for Nonmonetary Transactions” (“SFAS 153”).
SFAS 153 eliminates the exception from fair value measurement for nonmonetary exchanges of similar productive assets in paragraph 2l(b) of APB Opinion
No. 29, “Accounting for Nonmonetary Transactions,” and replaces it with an exception for
14
exchanges that do not have commercial substance. SFAS 153
specifies that a nonmonetary exchange has commercial substance if the future cash flows of the entity are expected to change significantly as a result
of the exchange. SFAS 153 is effective for the fiscal periods beginning after June 15, 2005. The adoption of SFAS 153 is not expected to have a
material effect on our results of operations or financial position.
In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 123(R),
“Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation” (“SFAS No. 123(R)”). SFAS No. 123(R) establishes standards for the accounting for
transactions in which an entity exchanges its equity instruments for goods or services. This Statement focuses primarily on accounting for transactions
in which an entity obtains employee services in share-based payment transactions. SFAS No. 123(R) requires that the fair value of such equity
instruments be recognized as an expense in the historical financial statements as services are performed. Prior to SFAS No. 123(R), only certain pro
forma disclosures of fair value were required. The provisions of this Statement are effective for the first interim reporting period that begins after
June 15, 2005. Accordingly, we will adopt SFAS No. 123(R) commencing with the quarter ending September 30, 2005. We estimate the impact of adoption of
SFAS No. 123(R) will approximate the impact of the adjustments made to determine pro forma net income and pro forma earnings per share under Statement
No. 123, as disclosed in Note 1 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
Risk Factors
Following are the key risk factors that have
affected our net sales and net income in the past and could materially impact our future net sales and net income:
Any decline in demand for public water
transmission projects could adversely affect our business. Our water transmission business accounted for approximately
61% of our net sales in 2004. Our water transmission revenue is derived from sales related to public water transmission projects. As a result, our
sales could be adversely impacted by a change in the number of projects planned by public water agencies or by delays in obtaining environmental
approvals and right-of-way permits. Additionally, adjustments in governmental capital spending, budgetary constraints related to capital projects, or
the inability of governmental entities to issue debt to finance projects could adversely affect our water transmission sales.
Project delays in public water transmission
projects could adversely affect our business. The public water agencies constructing water transmission projects
generally announce the projects well in advance of the bidding and construction process. It is not unusual for projects to be delayed and rescheduled.
Projects are delayed and rescheduled for a number of reasons, including changes in project priorities, difficulties in complying with environmental and
other government regulations and additional time required to acquire rights-of-way or property rights. Delays in public water transmission projects may
occur with too little notice to allow us to replace those projects in our manufacturing schedules. As a result, our business may be adversely affected
by unplanned downtime.
We have a significant amount of outstanding
debt. We have financed our operations through cash flow from operations, available borrowings and other financing
arrangements. The debt we have incurred could adversely affect us because:
• |
|
our ability to obtain additional financing for working capital
or other purposes in the future may be limited; |
• |
|
a portion of our cash flow from operations and funds available
under our credit agreement is dedicated to the payment of the principal and interest on our debt, which reduces funds available for operations;
and |
• |
|
certain of our borrowings are at variable rates of interest,
which cause us to be vulnerable to increases in interest rates. |
Our ability to make scheduled payments on our debt
will depend on our future operating performance and cash flow, which are subject to prevailing economic conditions, prevailing interest rate levels and
other financial, competitive and business factors, many of which are beyond our control. Our outstanding debt includes financial covenants that impose
certain requirements with respect to our financial condition and results of operations. These covenants place restrictions on, among other things, our
ability to incur certain additional indebtedness and to create liens or other encumbrances on assets. A failure to comply with the requirements of
these covenants, if not waived or cured, could permit acceleration of the related indebtedness and acceleration of indebtedness under other instruments
that include cross-acceleration or cross-default provisions.
15
We may be subject to claims for damages for
defective products, which could adversely affect our results of operations. We warrant our products to be free of
certain defects. Losses may result or be alleged to result from defects in our products, which could subject us to claims for damages, including
consequential damages. Any claims relating to defective products that result in liability exceeding our insurance coverage could have an adverse effect
on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Fluctuations in steel prices may affect our
future operating results. Purchased steel represents a substantial portion of our cost of sales, particularly in our
tubular products business. The steel industry is highly cyclical in nature, and, at times, pricing can be highly volatile due to a number of factors
beyond our control, including general economic conditions, import duties, other trade restrictions and currency exchange rates. This volatility can
significantly affect our gross profit. Although we seek to recover increases in steel prices through price increases in our products, we have not
always been completely successful. Any increase in steel prices that is not offset by increases in our prices could have an adverse effect on our
business, financial condition and results of operations.
Our business is very competitive and increased
competition could reduce our gross margins and net income. We face significant competition. Orders in the water
transmission business are competitively bid, and price competition can be vigorous. There are many competitors in the tubular products business, and
price is often a prime consideration for purchase of our products. Price competition may reduce our gross margins, which may adversely affect our net
income. Some of our competitors have greater financial, technical and marketing resources than we do. Our business could also be impeded if existing
competitors expand, or if they or new competitors establish new facilities within our market areas.
Our tubular products business faces intense
competition from imports. The level of imports of tubular products affects the domestic tubular products market. High
levels of imports may reduce the volume of tubular products sold by domestic producers and depress selling prices of tubular products. We believe that
import levels are affected by, among other things, overall worldwide demand for tubular products, the trade practices of foreign governments,
government subsidies to foreign producers and governmentally imposed trade restrictions in the United States. Increased imports of tubular products in
the United States, Canada, and Mexico could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Our water transmission business faces
competition from concrete and ductile iron pipe manufacturers. Water transmission pipe is manufactured generally from
steel, concrete or ductile iron. Each pipe material has advantages and disadvantages. Steel and concrete are more common materials for larger diameter
water transmission pipelines because ductile iron pipe generally is limited in diameter due to its manufacturing process. The public agencies and
engineers who determine the specifications for water transmission projects analyze these pipe materials for suitability for each project. Individual
project circumstances normally dictate the preferred material. If we experience cost increases in raw material, labor and overhead specific to our
industry or the location of our facilities, while competing products or companies do not experience similar changes, we could experience a change in
the demand, price and profitability of our products.
Our quarterly operating results are subject to
significant fluctuation. Our net sales and net income may fluctuate significantly from quarter to quarter due to the
schedule of production of water transmission orders, the seasonal variation in demand for tubular products, fluctuations in the cost of steel and other
raw materials, and competitive pressures. Results of operations in any period are not indicative of results for any future period, and comparisons
between any two periods may not be meaningful.
We depend on our senior management team, and
the loss of any member could adversely affect our operations. Our success depends on the management and leadership
skills of our senior management team. The loss of any of these individuals, particularly Brian W. Dunham, our president and chief executive officer, or
our inability to attract, retain and maintain additional personnel, could prevent us from fully implementing our business strategy. We cannot assure
you that we will be able to retain our existing senior management personnel or to attract additional qualified personnel when needed. We have not
entered into employment agreements with any of our senior management personnel.
The success of our business is affected by
general economic conditions, and our business may be adversely affected by economic slowdown or recession. Periods of
economic slowdown or recession in the United States, or the public perception that one may occur, could decrease the demand for our products, affect
the price of our
16
products and adversely impact our business. We
have been impacted by the general slowing of the economy and any worsening of the economic slowdown could have further negative impacts on our
business.
Our stock’s relatively low trading volume
may limit your ability to sell your shares. Although our shares of common stock are listed on the Nasdaq National
Market, our average daily trading volume over the twelve months ended December 31, 2004 is approximately 11,988 shares. As a result, holders of our
shares may have difficulty selling a large number of shares of our common stock in the manner or at a price that might otherwise be attainable if our
shares were more actively traded.
The market price of our common stock is
subject to significant fluctuations. The market price of our common stock could be subject to significant fluctuations.
Among the factors that could affect our stock price are:
• |
|
our operating and financial performance and
prospects; |
• |
|
quarterly variations in the rate of growth of our financial
indicators, such as earnings per share, net income and revenues; |
• |
|
changes in revenue or earnings estimates or publication of
research reports by analysts; |
• |
|
loss of any member of our senior management team; |
• |
|
speculation in the press or investment community; |
• |
|
strategic actions by us or our competitors, such as acquisitions
or restructuring; |
• |
|
sales of our common stock by shareholders; |
• |
|
general market conditions; and |
• |
|
domestic and international economic, legal and regulatory
factors unrelated to our performance. |
The stock markets in general have experienced broad
fluctuations that have often been unrelated to the operating performance of particular companies. These broad market fluctuations may adversely affect
the trading price of our common stock.
We are subject to various environmental laws,
which may require us to incur substantial costs, thereby reducing our profits. Failure to comply with environmental
laws, regulations and permits, or changes in such laws, including the imposition of more stringent standards for discharges into the environment, could
result in substantial operating costs and capital expenditures in order to maintain compliance and could also include fines and civil or criminal
sanctions, third party claims for property damage or personal injury, cleanup costs or temporary or permanent discontinuance of operations. Certain of
our facilities have been in operation for many years and, over time, we and other predecessor operators of these facilities may have generated, used,
handled and disposed of hazardous and other regulated wastes. Environmental liabilities could exist, including cleanup obligations at these or at other
locations where materials from our operations were disposed of, which could result in future expenditures that cannot be currently quantified and which
could reduce our profits. We have been notified by the Environmental Protection Agency that we may be subject to potential liability in connection with
a Superfund Assessment Site in Portland, Oregon. We cannot predict if it will be determined that we have liability with respect to this site, but any
such determination could have a material adverse affect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Certain provisions of our governing documents
and Oregon law could discourage potential acquisition proposals. Our articles of incorporation contain provisions
that:
• |
|
classify the board of directors into three classes, each of
which serves for a three-year term with one class elected each year; |
• |
|
provide that directors may be removed by shareholders only for
cause and only upon the affirmative vote of 75% of the outstanding shares of common stock; and |
• |
|
permit the board of directors to issue preferred stock in one or
more series and to fix the number of shares constituting any such series, the voting powers and all other rights and preferences of any such series,
without any further vote or action by our shareholders. |
17
In addition, we are subject to the Oregon Business
Combination Act, which imposes certain restrictions on business combination transactions and may encourage parties interested in acquiring us to
negotiate in advance with our board of directors. We also have a shareholder rights plan that acts to discourage any person or group from making a
tender offer for, or acquiring, more than 15% of our common stock without the approval of our board of directors. Any of these provisions could
discourage potential acquisition proposals, could deter, delay or prevent a change in control that our shareholders consider favorable and could
depress the market value of our common stock.
We face risks in connection with potential
acquisitions. Acquiring businesses that complement or expand our operations has been an important element of our
business strategy in the past. Although we have not completed an acquisition since 1999, we continue to evaluate potential acquisitions that may expand
and complement our business. We may not be able to successfully identify attractive acquisition candidates or negotiate favorable terms in the future.
Furthermore, our ability to effectively integrate any future acquisitions will depend on, among other things, the adequacy of our implementation plans,
the ability of our management to oversee and operate effectively the combined operations and our ability to achieve desired operational efficiencies.
If we are unable to successfully integrate the operations of any businesses that we may acquire in the future, our earnings and profitability could be
adversely affected.
| Item 7A. |
|
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure About Market
Risk |
We use derivative financial instruments from time to
time to reduce exposure associated with potential foreign currency rate changes occurring between the contract date and when the payments are received.
These instruments are not used for trading or for speculative purposes. The Company has entered into Foreign Exchange Agreements
(“Agreements”) for $3.4 million. The Agreements guarantee that the exchange rate is unchanged between the rate used in the contract bid
amount and the amount ultimately collected. As of December 31, 2004, $3.4 million was still open and the Agreements are expected to be completed by
July 2005. We believe risk exposure resulting from exchange rate movements to be immaterial.
We are exposed to cash flow and fair value risk due
to changes in interest rates with respect to certain portions of our debt. The debt subject to changes in interest rates are our $38.5 million
revolving credit line ($28.4 million outstanding as of December 31, 2004) and an Industrial Revenue Bond ($1.5 million outstanding as of December 31,
2004). Management believes our current risk exposure to interest rate movements to be immaterial.
Additional information required by this item is set
forth in “Item 2—Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Liquidity and Capital
Resources.”
| Item 8. |
|
Financial Statements and Supplementary Financial
Data |
The Consolidated Financial Statements required by
this item are included on pages F-1 to F-24. The financial statement schedule required by this item is included on page S-1. The quarterly information
required by this item is included under the caption Quarterly Data, in Note 16 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements as listed in
Item 15 of Part IV of this Report.
| Item 9. |
|
Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting
and Financial Disclosure |
None.
| Item 9A. |
|
Controls and Procedures |
Conclusion Regarding the Effectiveness of Disclosure Controls and
Procedures
As of December 31, 2004, an evaluation was carried
out under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s management, including the Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) and
Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”), of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures. Based on that evaluation, the CEO and CFO
have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in reports that we
file or submit under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in
Securities and Exchange Commission rules and forms. Subsequent to the date of their evaluation, there were no significant changes in our internal
controls or in other
18
| factors that could significantly affect those controls,
including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses. |
Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial
Reporting
Our management is responsible for establishing and
maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f). Under the supervision and with
the participation of our management, including our CEO and CFO, we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial
reporting based on the framework in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the
Treadway Commission. Based on our evaluation under the framework in Internal Control—Integrated Framework, our management concluded that
our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2004.
Our management’s assessment of the
effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004 has been audited by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent
registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report which is included herein.
| Item 9B. |
|
Other Information |
None.
19
PART III
| Item 10. |
|
Directors and Executive Officers of the
Registrant |
The information required by this item is included
under the captions Elections of Directors, Management and Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance in Northwest
Pipe’s Proxy Statement for its 2005 Annual Meeting of Shareholders and is incorporated herein by reference. Management has adopted a Code of
Ethics that applies to our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Corporate Controller and Operations Controller. A copy of the Code of
Ethics can be found on our website at www.nwpipe.com. None of the material on our website is part of this Form 10-K. If there is any waiver from any
provision from the code of ethics for our Executive Officers, we will disclose the nature of such waiver on our website or in a current report on Form
8-K.
| Item 11. |
|
Executive Compensation |
The information required by this item is included
under the caption Executive Compensation and Stock Performance Graph in Northwest Pipe’s Proxy Statement for its 2005 Annual Meeting
of Shareholders and is incorporated herein by reference.
| Item 12. |
|
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management
and Related Stockholder Matters |
The information required by this item is included
under the caption Stock Owned by Management and Principal Shareholders in Northwest Pipe’s Proxy Statement for its 2005 Annual Meeting of
Shareholders and is incorporated herein by reference. Information with respect to equity compensation plans is included under the caption Equity
Compensation Plan Information in Northwest Pipe’s Proxy Statement for its 2005 Annual Meeting of Shareholders and is incorporated herein by
reference.
| Item 13. |
|
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions |
The information required by this item is included
under the caption Certain Relationships and Related Transactions in Northwest Pipe’s Proxy Statement for its 2005 Annual Meeting of
Shareholders and is incorporated herein by reference.
| Item 14. |
|
Principal Accountant Fees and Services |
The information required by this item is included
under the caption Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm in Northwest Pipe’s Proxy Statement for its 2005 Annual Meeting of
Shareholders and is incorporated herein by reference.
20
PART IV
| Item 15. |
|
Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedule |
(a)(1) Financial Statements
The Financial Statements, together with the report thereon of
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP are included on the pages indicated below.
|
|
|
|
Page
|
Report of
Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm |
|
|
|
|
F-1 |
|
Consolidated
Statements of Income for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002 |
|
|
|
|
F-3 |
|
Consolidated
Statements of Comprehensive Income for the years ended December 31, 2004,
2003 and 2002 |
|
|
|
|
F-3 |
|
Consolidated
Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2004 and 2003 |
|
|
|
|
F-4 |
|
Consolidated
Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002 |
|
|
|
|
F-5 |
|
Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002 |
|
|
|
|
F-6 |
|
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements |
|
|
|
|
F-7 |
|
(a)(2) Financial Statement Schedule
The following schedule is filed herewith:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
Schedule
II |
|
|
|
Valuation and Qualifying Accounts |
|
|
S-1 |
|
Schedules not listed above have been omitted because the information required to be
set forth therein is not applicable or is included in the Consolidated Financial Statements or notes thereto.
21
(a)(3) Exhibits included herein:
Exhibit
Number
|
|
|
|
Description
|
3.1 |
|
|
|
Second Restated Articles of Incorporation, incorporated by reference to Exhibits to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1, as
amended, effective November 30, 1995, Commission Registration No. 33-97308 (“the S-1”) |
3.2 |
|
|
|
Second Amended and Restated Bylaws, incorporated by reference to Exhibits to the S-1 |
4.1 |
|
|
|
Form
of Rights Agreement dated as of June 28, 1999 between the Company and ChaseMellon Shareholder Services, L.L.C. as Rights Agent, incorporated by
reference to Exhibits 1.1 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form 8-A as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 1,
1999 |
10.1 |
|
|
|
First Amendment to Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated October 21, 2004 by and between Northwest Pipe Company and Wells Fargo Bank,
National Association, incorporated by reference to Exhibits to the Company’s Report on Form 8-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on October 26, 2004 |
10.2 |
|
|
|
1986
Incentive Stock Option Plan, incorporated by reference to Exhibits to the S-1* |
10.3 |
|
|
|
1995
Stock Option Plan for Nonemployee Directors, incorporated by reference to Exhibits to the S-1* |
10.4 |
|
|
|
Loan
Agreement dated May 1, 1990 between the Company and California Statewide Communities Development Authority, incorporated by reference to Exhibits to
the S-1 |
10.5 |
|
|
|
Note
Purchase Agreement dated November 1, 1997, incorporated by reference to Exhibits to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 1997 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 27, 1998 |
10.6 |
|
|
|
Stock Purchase Agreement dated March 6, 1998 by and among Northwest Pipe Company, Southwestern Pipe, Inc., P&H Tube Corporation, Lewis
Family Investments Partnership, Ltd., Philip C. Lewis, Hosea E. Henderson, Don S. Brzowski, William H. Cottle, Barry J. Debroeck, Horace M. Jordan and
William B. Stuessy (the “Stock Purchase Agreement”), incorporated by reference to Exhibits to the Company’s Report on Form 8-K as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 20, 1998 |
10.7 |
|
|
|
Note
Purchase Agreement dated April 1, 1998 (certain schedules to the Agreement have been omitted), incorporated by reference to Exhibits to the
Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 1998 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 15,
1998 |
10.8 |
|
|
|
1999
Employee Stock Purchase Plan, incorporated by reference to Exhibit A to the Company’s Proxy Statement for its 1999 Annual Meeting of Shareholders
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 9, 1999* |
10.9 |
|
|
|
Form
of Change in Control Agreement, dated July 28, 1999, between Northwest Pipe Company and William R. Tagmyer and Brian W. Dunham, incorporated by
reference to Exhibits to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1999 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on March 30, 2000* |
10.10 |
|
|
|
Form
of Change in Control Agreement, dated July 28, 1999, between Northwest Pipe Company and Charles L. Koenig, Robert L. Mahoney, Terrence R. Mitchell,
John D. Murakami and Gary A. Stokes, incorporated by reference to Exhibits to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December
31, 1999 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 30, 2000* |
22
Exhibit
Number
|
|
|
|
Description
|
10.11 |
|
|
|
Amended 1995 Stock Incentive Plan, incorporated by reference to Exhibit A to the Company’s Proxy Statement for its 2000 Annual meeting of
Shareholders, incorporated by reference to Exhibits to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2000, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 4, 2000 |
10.12 |
|
|
|
Office Lease Agreement dated January 7, 2000, between Northwest Pipe Company and 200 Market Associates Limited Partnership, incorporated by
reference to Exhibits to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2000 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on May 4, 2000 |
10.13 |
|
|
|
Northwest Pipe NQ Retirement Savings Plan, dated July 1, 1999, incorporated by reference to Exhibits to the Company’s Quarterly Report
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2000, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 11, 2000 |
10.14 |
|
|
|
General Electric Capital Corporation Master Lease Agreement, dated September 26, 2000, incorporated by reference to Exhibits to the
Company’s Quarterly Report Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2000 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 13,
2000 |
10.15 |
|
|
|
Agreement between Northwest Pipe Company and William R. Tagmyer dated November 14, 2000, incorporated by reference to Exhibits to the
Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2000 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 28,
2001* |
10.16 |
|
|
|
Amendment to change control agreement between Northwest Pipe Company and William R. Tagmyer dated November 14, 2000, incorporated by reference
to Exhibits to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2000 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on March 28, 2001 |
10.18 |
|
|
|
General Electric Capital Corporation Master Lease Agreement, dated May 30, 2001, incorporated by reference to Exhibits to the Company’s
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2001 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 14,
2001 |
10.22 |
|
|
|
Amended and Restated Credit Agreement between Northwest Pipe Company with Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, dated February 25, 2004,
incorporated by reference to Exhibits to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on April 30, 2004 |
10.23 |
|
|
|
Note
Purchase and Private Shelf Agreement between Northwest Pipe Company and Prudential Investment Management dated February 25, 2004, incorporated by
reference to Exhibits to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on April 30, 2004 |
10.24 |
|
|
|
Amendment dated February 25, 2004 to Note Purchase Agreements dated as of November 15, 1997 and dated as of April 1, 1998 between Northwest
Pipe Company and the Purchasers named in the schedules to such Agreements, incorporated by reference to Exhibits to the Company’s Quarterly Report
on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 30, 2004 |
10.25 |
|
|
|
Intercreditor and Collateral Agency Agreement between Northwest Pipe Company and Prudential Investment Management, Inc. and the Prudential
Noteholders, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association as the Sole Credit Agreement Lender, The 1997 Noteholders, The 1998 Noteholders and Wells Fargo
bank, National Association, as Collateral Agent, incorporated by reference to Exhibits to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 30, 2004 |
23
Exhibit
Number
|
|
|
|
Description
|
14.1 |
|
|
|
Code
of Ethics for Senior Financial Officers, incorporated by reference to Exhibits to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 12, 2004 |
21 |
|
|
|
Subsidiaries of the Registrant, filed herewith |
23 |
|
|
|
Consent of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, filed herewith |
31.1 |
|
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
31.2 |
|
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
32.1 |
|
|
|
Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
32.2 |
|
|
|
Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
| * |
|
This exhibit constitutes a management contract or compensatory
plan or arrangement. |
24
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Board of Directors and
Shareholders of Northwest Pipe
Company:
We have completed an integrated audit of Northwest
Pipe Company’s 2004 consolidated financial statements and of its internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004 and audits of
its 2003 and 2002 consolidated financial statements in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States).
Our opinions, based on our audits, are presented below.
Consolidated financial statements and financial statement
schedule
In our opinion, the consolidated financial
statements listed in the index appearing under Item 15(a)(1), present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Northwest Pipe
Company and its subsidiaries at December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the
period ended December 31, 2004 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. In addition, in our
opinion, the financial statement schedule listed in the index appearing under Item 15(a)(2) presents fairly, in all material respects, the information
set forth therein when read in conjunction with the related consolidated financial statements. These financial statements and financial statement
schedule are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and
financial statement schedule based on our audits. We conducted our audits of these statements in accordance with the standards of the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the
financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit of financial statements includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the
amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and
evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Internal control over financial reporting
Also, in our opinion, management’s assessment,
included in Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting appearing under Item 9A, that the Company maintained effective
internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004 based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework
issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO), is fairly stated, in all material respects, based on those
criteria. Furthermore, in our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of
December 31, 2004, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the COSO. The Company’s management
is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over
financial reporting. Our responsibility is to express opinions on management’s assessment and on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal
control over financial reporting based on our audit. We conducted our audit of internal control over financial reporting in accordance with the
standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. An audit of internal
control over financial reporting includes obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, evaluating management’s
assessment, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control, and performing such other procedures as we consider
necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinions.
A company’s internal control over financial
reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial
statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial
reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly
reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary
to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the
company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (iii) provide reasonable
F-1
| assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of
unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements. |
Because of its inherent limitations, internal
control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are
subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or
procedures may deteriorate.
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Portland, Oregon
March 11, 2005
F-2
NORTHWEST PIPE COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF
INCOME
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004
|
|
2003
|
|
2002
|
Net
sales |
|
|
|
$ |
291,910 |
|
|
$ |
244,987 |
|
|
$ |
266,101 |
|
Cost of
sales |
|
|
|
|
242,614 |
|
|
|
211,759 |
|
|
|
222,172 |
|
Gross
profit |
|
|
|
|
49,296 |
|
|
|
33,228 |
|
|
|
43,929 |
|
Selling,
general and administrative expense |
|
|
|
|
23,126 |
|
|
|
22,293 |
|
|
|
23,140 |
|
Operating
income |
|
|
|
|
26,170 |
|
|
|
10,935 |
|
|
|
20,789 |
|
Interest
expense, net |
|
|
|
|
6,346 |
|
|
|
5,210 |
|
|
|
5,549 |
|
Income before
income taxes |
|
|
|
|
19,824 |
|
|
|
5,725 |
|
|
|
15,240 |
|
Provision for
income taxes |
|
|
|
|
7,447 |
|
|
|
2,194 |
|
|
|
5,981 |
|
Net
income |
|
|
|
$ |
12,377 |
|
|
$ |
3,531 |
|
|
$ |
9,259 |
|
Basic
earnings per share |
|
|
|
$ |
1.87 |
|
|
$ |
0.54 |
|
|
$ |
1.42 |
|
Diluted
earnings per share |
|
|
|
$ |
1.83 |
|
|
$ |
0.53 |
|
|
$ |
1.37 |
|
Shares used
in per share calculations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
|
|
6,618 |
|
|
|
6,553 |
|
|
|
6,543 |
|
Diluted |
|
|
|
|
6,768 |
|
|
|
6,660 |
|
|
|
6,756 |
|
NORTHWEST PIPE COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004
|
|
2003
|
|
2002
|
Net
income |
|
|
|
$ |
12,377 |
|
|
$ |
3,531 |
|
|
$ |
9,259 |
|
Other
comprehensive income (loss):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minimum
pension liability adjustment |
|
|
|
|
(1,117 |
) |
|
|
872 |
|
|
|
(551 |
) |
Tax
effect |
|
|
|
|
420 |
|
|
|
(334 |
) |
|
|
216 |
|
Comprehensive
income |
|
|
|
$ |
11,680 |
|
|
$ |
4,069 |
|
|
$ |
8,924 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial
statements.
F-3
NORTHWEST PIPE COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004
|
|
2003
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash
equivalents |
|
|
|
$ |
89 |
|
|
$ |
128 |
|
Trade and
other receivables, less allowance for doubtful accounts of $1,221 and $831 |
|
|
|
|
53,882 |
|
|
|
48,577 |
|
Costs and
estimated earnings in excess of billings on uncompleted contracts |
|
|
|
|
71,205 |
|
|
|
42,774 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
|
|
60,696 |
|
|
|
43,655 |
|
Refundable
income taxes |
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
2,654 |
|
Deferred
income taxes |
|
|
|
|
2,619 |
|
|
|
1,611 |
|
Prepaid
expenses and other |
|
|
|
|
1,499 |
|
|
|
2,356 |
|
Total current
assets |
|
|
|
|
189,990 |
|
|
|
141,755 |
|
Property and
equipment, net |
|
|
|
|
116,716 |
|
|
|
110,965 |
|
Goodwill,
net |
|
|
|
|
21,451 |
|
|
|
21,451 |
|
Restricted
assets |
|
|
|
|
2,300 |
|
|
|
2,300 |
|
Other
assets |
|
|
|
|
4,946 |
|
|
|
3,539 |
|
Total
assets |
|
|
|
$ |
335,403 |
|
|
$ |
280,010 |
|
|
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note payable
to financial institution |
|
|
|
$ |
28,412 |
|
|
$ |
29,441 |
|
Current
portion of long-term debt |
|
|
|
|
10,964 |
|
|
|
10,964 |
|
Current
portion of capital lease obligations |
|
|
|
|
823 |
|
|
|
1,072 |
|
Accounts
payable |
|
|
|
|
44,535 |
|
|
|
24,387 |
|
Accrued
liabilities |
|
|
|
|
7,324 |
|
|
|
4,868 |
|
Total current
liabilities |
|
|
|
|
92,058 |
|
|
|
70,732 |
|
Long-term
debt, less current portion |
|
|
|
|
59,607 |
|
|
|
35,072 |
|
Capital lease
obligations, less current portion |
|
|
|
|
82 |
|
|
|
842 |
|
Deferred
income taxes |
|
|
|
|
23,052 |
|
|
|
20,382 |
|
Deferred gain
on sale of equipment |
|
|
|
|
13,152 |
|
|
|
19,503 |
|
Pension and
other benefits |
|
|
|
|
3,300 |
|
|
|
1,828 |
|
Total
liabilities |
|
|
|
|
191,251 |
|
|
|
148,359 |
|
Commitments
and contingencies (Notes 8 and 12)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders’ equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred
stock, $.01 par value, 10,000,000 shares authorized, none
issued or outstanding |
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
Common stock,
$.01 par value, 15,000,000 shares authorized, 6,686,196 and 6,560,385 shares issued and outstanding |
|
|
|
|
67 |
|
|
|
66 |
|
Additional
paid-in-capital |
|
|
|
|
40,907 |
|
|
|
39,667 |
|
Retained
earnings |
|
|
|
|
105,112 |
|
|
|
92,735 |
|
Accumulated
other comprehensive loss:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minimum
pension liability |
|
|
|
|
(1,934 |
) |
|
|
(817 |
) |
Total
stockholders’ equity |
|
|
|
|
144,152 |
|
|
|
131,651 |
|
Total
liabilities and stockholders’ equity |
|
|
|
$ |
335,403 |
|
|
$ |
280,010 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial
statements.
F-4
NORTHWEST PIPE COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES
IN STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
|
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
Amount
|
|
Additional
Paid-in
Capital
|
|
Retained
Earnings
|
|
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Loss
|
|
Total
Stockholders’
Equity
|
Balances,
December 31, 2001 |
|
|
|
|
6,517,997 |
|
|
$ |
65 |
|
|
$ |
39,373 |
|
|
$ |
79,945 |
|
|
$ |
(1,138 |
) |
|
$ |
118,245 |
|
Net
income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,259 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,259 |
|
Issuance of
common stock under stock option plans |
|
|
|
|
24,967 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
93 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
93 |
|
Issuance of
common stock under employee stock purchase plan |
|
|
|
|
5,915 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
71 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
71 |
|
Minimum
pension liability
adjustment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(551 |
) |
|
|
(551 |
) |
Tax benefit
of stock options
exercised |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35 |
|
Balances,
December 31, 2002 |
|
|
|
|
6,548,879 |
|
|
|
65 |
|
|
|
39,572 |
|
|
|
89,204 |
|
|
|
(1,689 |
) |
|
|
127,152 |
|
Net
income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,531 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,531 |
|
Issuance of
common stock under
stock option plans |
|
|
|
|
11,506 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37 |
|
Minimum
pension liability
adjustment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
872 |
|
|
|
872 |
|
Tax benefit
of stock options
exercised |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
59 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
59 |
|
Balances,
December 31, 2003 |
|
|
|
|
6,560,385 |
|
|
|
66 |
|
|
|
39,667 |
|
|
|
92,735 |
|
|
|
(817 |
) |
|
|
131,651 |
|
Net
income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,377 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,377 |
|
Issuance of
common stock under stock option plans |
|
|
|
|
125,811 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
927 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
928 |
|
Minimum
pension liability
adjustment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,117 |
) |
|
|
(1,117 |
) |
Tax benefit
of stock options
exercised |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
313 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
313 |
|
Balances,
December 31, 2004 |
|
|
|
|
6,686,196 |
|
|
$ |
67 |
|
|
$ |
40,907 |
|
|
$ |
105,112 |
|
|
$ |
(1,934 |
) |
|
$ |
144,152 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial
statements.
F-5
NORTHWEST PIPE COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH
FLOWS
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004
|
|
2003
|
|
2002
|
Cash Flows
From Operating Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
income |
|
|
|
$ |
12,377 |
|
|
$ |
3,531 |
|
|
$ |
9,259 |
|
Adjustments
to reconcile net income to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation
and amortization of property and equipment |
|
|
|
|
6,203 |
|
|
|
4,694 |
|
|
|
3,793 |
|
Amortization
of debt issuance costs |
|
|
|
|
135 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
Deferred
income taxes |
|
|
|
|
1,662 |
|
|
|
3,446 |
|
|
|
1,851 |
|
Deferred gain
on sale-leaseback of equipment |
|
|
|
|
(6,351 |
) |
|
|
(6,581 |
) |
|
|
(2,748 |
) |
Loss on sale
of equipment |
|
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
82 |
|
Tax benefit
of nonqualified stock options exercised |
|
|
|
|
313 |
|
|
|
59 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
Changes in
current assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade and
other receivables, net |
|
|
|
|
(5,305 |
) |
|
|
4,814 |
|
|
|
1,729 |
|
Costs and
estimated earnings in excess of billings on uncompleted contracts |
|
|
|
|
(28,431 |
) |
|
|
6,619 |
|
|
|
6,842 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
|
|
(17,041 |
) |
|
|
3,878 |
|
|
|
1,913 |
|
Refundable
income taxes |
|
|
|
|
2,654 |
|
|
|
(2,654 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
Prepaid
expenses and other |
|
|
|
|
496 |
|
|
|
(228 |
) |
|
|
(1,964 |
) |
Accounts
payable |
|
|
|
|
20,148 |
|
|
|
(6,711 |
) |
|
|
2,977 |
|
Accrued and
other liabilities |
|
|
|
|
2,811 |
|
|
|
(520 |
) |
|
|
(240 |
) |
Net cash
provided by (used in) operating activities |
|
|
|
|
(10,301 |
) |
|
|
10,380 |
|
|
|
23,529 |
|
Cash Flows
From Investing Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additions to
property and equipment |
|
|
|
|
(11,995 |
) |
|
|
(11,115 |
) |
|
|
(28,823 |
) |
Proceeds from
sale of property and equipment |
|
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
75 |
|
Net cash used
in investing activities |
|
|
|
|
(11,983 |
) |
|
|
(11,089 |
) |
|
|
(28,748 |
) |
Cash Flows
From Financing Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from
sale of common stock |
|
|
|
|
928 |
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
164 |
|
Borrowings on
long-term debt |
|
|
|
|
35,500 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
Payments on
long-term debt |
|
|
|
|
(10,965 |
) |
|
|
(10,964 |
) |
|
|
(10,964 |
) |
Net
borrowings (proceeds) under notes payable to
financial institutions |
|
|
|
|
(1,029 |
) |
|
|
12,104 |
|
|
|
15,296 |
|
Payments of
debt issuance costs |
|
|
|
|
(1,180 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
Proceeds of
sale-leaseback |
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
1,275 |
|
Borrowings
from capital lease obligations |
|
|
|
|
79 |
|
|
|
387 |
|
|
|
416 |
|
Payments on
capital lease obligations |
|
|
|
|
(1,088 |
) |
|
|
(888 |
) |
|
|
(878 |
) |
Net cash
provided by financing activities |
|
|
|
|
22,245 |
|
|
|
676 |
|
|
|
5,309 |
|
Net increase
(decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
|
|
(39 |
) |
|
|
(33 |
) |
|
|
90 |
|
Cash and cash
equivalents, beginning of period |
|
|
|
|
128 |
|
|
|
161 |
|
|
|
71 |
|
Cash and cash
equivalents, end of period |
|
|
|
$ |
89 |
|
|
$ |
128 |
|
|
$ |
161 |
|
Supplemental
Disclosure of Cash Flow Information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid
during the period for interest, net of amounts capitalized |
|
|
|
$ |
6,122 |
|
|
$ |
5,527 |
|
|
$ |
5,432 |
|
Cash paid
during the period for income taxes (net of tax refunds of $4,101, $2,781, and $5) |
|
|
|
|
2,772 |
|
|
|
1,062 |
|
|
|
4,896 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial
statements.
F-6
NORTHWEST PIPE COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
(Dollar amounts in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
| 1. |
|
SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES: |
The consolidated financial statements include the
accounts of Northwest Pipe Company and its wholly owned subsidiaries (the “Company”). All significant inter-company balances have been
eliminated. The Company manufactures water transmission products in its Portland, Oregon; Denver, Colorado; Adelanto and Riverside, California;
Parkersburg, West Virginia; and Saginaw, Texas facilities. Tubular products are manufactured in the Company’s Portland, Oregon; Atchison, Kansas;
Houston, Texas; Bossier City, Louisiana; and Monterrey, Mexico facilities.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents consist of cash and short
term highly liquid investments with remaining maturities of three months or less when purchased.
Inventories
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or
market. Finished goods are stated at standard cost, which approximates the first-in, first-out method of accounting. Raw material inventories of steel
coil are stated at cost on a specific identification basis or at standard cost. Raw material inventories of coating and lining materials, as well as
materials and supplies, are stated on an average cost basis.
Property and Equipment
Property and equipment, including land, buildings
and equipment under capital leases, are stated at cost. Maintenance and repairs are expensed as incurred and costs of improvements and renewals,
including interest, are capitalized. Depreciation and amortization are determined by the straight-line method based on the estimated useful lives of
the related assets. Upon disposal, costs and related accumulated depreciation of the assets are removed from the accounts and resulting gains or losses
are reflected in operations. The Company leases equipment under long-term capital leases, which are being amortized on a straight-line basis over the
shorter of the lease terms or the estimated useful lives of the assets.
Estimated useful lives by major classes of property
and equipment are as follows:
Land
improvements |
|
|
|
|
20 – 30 |
years |
Buildings |
|
|
|
|
20 – 40 |
years |
Equipment |
|
|
|
|
5 – 18 |
years |
Goodwill
The Company has classified as goodwill the cost in
excess of fair value of the net assets of companies acquired in purchase transactions. Net goodwill was $21.5 million at December 31, 2004 and 2003.
With the adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (“SFAS”) No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets,” goodwill
is no longer amortized. Based on its most recent analysis, the Company believes that no impairment of goodwill exists at December 31,
2004.
Revenue Recognition
Revenue from construction contracts in the
Company’s water transmission segment is recognized on the percentage-of-completion method, measured by the percentage of total costs incurred to
date to the estimated total costs of each contract. Estimated total costs are reviewed monthly and updated by project management and operations
personnel for all projects that are fifty percent or more complete, except that major projects, usually over $5.0 million, are reviewed earlier if
sufficient production has been completed to provide enough information to revise the original estimated total cost of the project. All cost revisions
that result in the gross profit as a percent
F-7
NORTHWEST PIPE COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollar amounts in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES:
(Continued)
of sales increasing or decreasing by greater
than one percent are reviewed by senior management personnel. Contract costs include all direct material and labor costs and those indirect costs
related to contract performance, such as indirect labor, supplies, tools, repairs and depreciation. Selling, general and administrative costs are
charged to expense as incurred. Provisions for estimated losses on uncompleted contracts are made in the period such estimated losses are known.
Changes in job performance, job conditions and estimated profitability, including those arising from contract penalty provisions, and final contract
settlements may result in revisions to costs and income and are recognized in the period in which the revisions are determined.
Revenue from the Company’s tubular products
segment is recognized when all four of the following criteria have been satisfied: persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists; delivery has occurred;
the price is fixed or determinable; and collectibility is reasonably assured.
Income Taxes
The Company records deferred income tax assets and
liabilities based upon the difference between the financial statement and income tax bases of assets and liabilities using enacted income tax rates.
Valuation allowances are established when necessary to reduce deferred income tax assets to the amount expected to be realized. Income tax expense is
the tax payable for the period and the change during the period in net deferred income tax assets and liabilities.
Earnings per Share
Basic earnings per share is computed using the
weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per share is computed using the weighted average
number of shares of common stock and dilutive common equivalent shares outstanding during the period. Incremental shares of 150,271, 107,067 and
213,359 for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003, 2002, respectively, were used in the calculations of diluted earnings per share. Options to
purchase 304,686 shares of common stock at prices of $17.125 to $22.875 per share, options to purchase 821,698 shares of common stock at prices of
$13.563 to $22.875 per share, and options to purchase 288,357 shares of common stock at prices of $17.125 to $22.875 per share were outstanding during
2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively, but were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share because the exercise price of the options was
greater than the average market price of the underlying common stock.
Concentrations of Credit Risk
Financial instruments, which potentially subject the
Company to concentrations of credit risk, consist principally of trade receivables. Trade receivables are with a large number of customers, including
municipalities, manufacturers, distributors and contractors, dispersed across a wide geographic base. No accounts receivable balance accounted for 10%
or more of total accounts receivable at December 31, 2004 and 2003.
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
The Company maintains allowances for estimated
losses resulting from the inability of our customers to make required payments and contract disputes. At least monthly, the Company reviews past due
balances to identify the reasons for non-payment. If the past due amount results from a specific water transmission project, a specific allowance is
recorded to reduce the related receivable to the expected recovery amount given all information presently available. A general allowance is recorded
for all other customers based on certain other factors including the length of time the receivables are past due and historical collection experience
with individual customers. The Company will write off a receivable account once the account is deemed uncollectible. The Company believes the reported
allowances at December 31, 2004 and 2003 are adequate. If the customers’ financial conditions were to
F-8
NORTHWEST PIPE COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollar amounts in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES:
(Continued)
deteriorate resulting in their inability to make
payments, additional allowances may need to be recorded, which would result in additional expenses being recorded for the period in which such
determination was made.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The fair values of financial instruments are the
amounts at which the instrument could be exchanged in a current transaction between willing parties, other than in a forced or liquidation sale. The
carrying amounts reflected in the consolidated balance sheets for cash and cash equivalents, trade receivables, other current assets and current
liabilities approximate fair value because of the short maturity for these instruments. The fair value approximates the carrying value of the
Company’s borrowings under its long-term arrangements based upon interest rates available for the same or similar loans.
Long-Lived Assets
Property and equipment are reviewed for impairment
in accordance with SFAS No. 144, “Accounting for the Disposal of Long-Lived Assets.” The Company assesses impairment of property and
equipment whenever changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying values of the assets may not be recoverable.
Goodwill represents the excess of cost over the
assigned value of the net assets in connection with all acquisitions. Goodwill is reviewed for impairment in accordance with SFAS No. 142
“Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets.” SFAS 142 requires that goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite lives are no longer amortized
but are reviewed annually, or more frequently if impairment indicators arise, for impairment.
If the Company determines that the carrying value of
the property and equipment or goodwill will not be recoverable, the Company calculates and records impairment losses using future undiscounted cash
flows. The Company estimates future undiscounted cash flows using assumptions about the expected future operating performance of the Company. The
Company’s estimates of undiscounted cash flows may differ from actual cash flow due to, among other things, technological changes, economic
conditions, or changes to its business operations.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in
conformity with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the
reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported
amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. The Company bases its estimates on historical experience and on various assumptions that
are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances at that time. On an on-going basis, the Company evaluates all of its estimates, including those
related to revenue recognition and doubtful account allowances. Actual results could differ from those estimates under different assumptions or
conditions.
Self Insurance
The Company is self-insured for health claims for
certain employees. In addition, the Company is self-insured for a portion of losses and liabilities associated with workers compensation claims. Losses
are accrued based upon the Company’s estimates of the aggregate liability for claims incurred using historical experience and, for workers
compensation, certain actuarial assumptions followed in the insurance industry. The Company has purchased stop-loss coverage in order to limit, to the
extent feasible, the aggregate exposure to claims. There is no assurance that such coverage will adequately protect the Company against liability from
all potential consequences.
Pension Benefits
The Company has two defined benefit pension plans
that are frozen. The Company funds these plans to cover current plan costs plus amortization of the unfunded plan liabilities. To record these
obligations, management uses estimates relating to assumed inflation, investment returns, mortality, and discount rates. Management, along with
third-party actuaries, reviews all of these assumptions on an ongoing basis.
F-9
NORTHWEST PIPE COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollar amounts in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES:
(Continued)
Stock-based Compensation
The Company accounts for stock-based employee
compensation arrangements in accordance with the provisions of Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to
Employees” (“APB No. 25”) and complies with the disclosure provisions of SFAS No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based
Compensation.” Under APB No. 25, compensation expense is based on the difference, if any, on the date of grant, between the fair value of the
Company’s stock and the exercise price of the option. The Company accounts for stock, stock options and warrants issued to non-employees in
accordance with the provisions of Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) Issue No. 96-18, “Accounting for Equity Instruments that are
Issued to Other than Employees for Acquiring or in Conjunction with Selling, Goods or Services.” Compensation and services expenses are recognized
over the vesting period of the options or warrants or the periods the related services are rendered, as appropriate.
At December 31, 2004, the Company has two
stock-based compensation plans, which are described more fully in Note 10. No stock-based employee compensation cost is reflected in net income, as all
options granted under those plans had an exercise price equal to the market value of the underlying common stock on the date of grant. The following
table illustrates the effect on net income and earnings per share as if the Company had applied the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS 123 to
stock-based employee compensation.
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004
|
|
2003
|
|
2002
|
Net income,
as reported |
|
|
|
$ |
12,377 |
|
|
$ |
3,531 |
|
|
$ |
9,259 |
|
Deduct: Total
stock-based employee compensation expense determined under fair value based method for all awards, net of related tax effects |
|
|
|
|
322 |
|
|
|
459 |
|
|
|
389 |
|
Pro forma net
income |
|
|
|
$ |
12,055 |
|
|
$ |
3,072 |
|
|
$ |
8,870 |
|
Earnings per
share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic—as
reported |
|
|
|
$ |
1.87 |
|
|
$ |
0.54 |
|
|
$ |
1.42 |
|
Basic—pro forma |
|
|
|
$ |
1.82 |
|
|
$ |
0.47 |
|
|
$ |
1.36 |
|
|
Diluted—as reported |
|
|
|
$ |
1.83 |
|
|
$ |
0.53 |
|
|
$ |
1.37 |
|
Diluted—pro forma |
|
|
|
$ |
1.78 |
|
|
$ |
0.46 |
|
|
$ |
1.31 |
|
Reclassification
Certain amounts in 2003 and 2002 have been
reclassified to conform with the 2004 presentation. Net income was not affected by these reclassifications.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In November 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 151,
“Inventory Costs—An Amendment of ARB No. 43, Chapter 4” (“SFAS 151”). SFAS 151 amends the guidance in ARB No. 43, Chapter 4,
“Inventory Pricing,” to clarify the accounting for abnormal amounts of idle facility expense, freight, handling costs, and wasted material
(spoilage). Among other provisions, the new rule requires that items such as idle facility expense, excessive spoilage, double freight, and rehandling
costs be recognized as current-period charges regardless of whether they meet the criterion of “so abnormal” as stated in ARB No. 43.
Additionally, SFAS 151 requires that the allocation of fixed production overhead to the costs of conversion be based on the normal capacity of the
production facilities. SFAS 151 is effective for fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2005. The Company is currently evaluating the effect that the
adoption of SFAS 151 will have on the results of operations or financial position, but does not expect SFAS 151 to have a material
effect.
In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 153,
“Exchanges of Nonmonetary Assets—An Amendment of APB Opinion No. 29, Accounting for Nonmonetary Transactions” (“SFAS 153”).
SFAS 153 eliminates the
F-10
NORTHWEST PIPE COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollar amounts in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES:
(Continued)
exception from fair value measurement for
nonmonetary exchanges of similar productive assets in paragraph 2l(b) of APB Opinion No. 29, “Accounting for Nonmonetary Transactions,” and
replaces it with an exception for exchanges that do not have commercial substance. SFAS 153 specifies that a nonmonetary exchange has commercial
substance if the future cash flows of the entity are expected to change significantly as a result of the exchange. SFAS 153 is effective for the fiscal
periods beginning after June 15, 2005. The adoption of SFAS 153 is not expected to have a material effect on the Company’s results of operations
or financial position.
In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 123(R),
“Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation” (“SFAS No. 123(R)”). SFAS No. 123(R) establishes standards for the accounting for
transactions in which an entity exchanges its equity instruments for goods or services. This Statement focuses primarily on accounting for transactions
in which an entity obtains employee services in share-based payment transactions. SFAS No. 123(R) requires that the fair value of such equity
instruments be recognized as an expense in the historical financial statements as services are performed. Prior to SFAS No. 123(R), only certain pro
forma disclosures of fair value were required. The provisions of this Statement are effective for the first interim reporting period that begins after
June 15, 2005. Accordingly, the Company will adopt SFAS No. 123(R) commencing with the quarter ending September 30, 2005. The Company estimates the
impact of adoption of SFAS No. 123(R) will approximate the impact of the adjustments made to determine pro forma net income and pro forma earnings per
share under Statement No. 123.
| 2. |
|
COSTS AND ESTIMATED EARNINGS IN EXCESS OF BILLINGS ON
UNCOMPLETED
CONTRACTS: |
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004
|
|
2003
|
Costs
incurred on uncompleted contracts |
|
|
|
$ |
177,389 |
|
|
$ |
143,993 |
|
Estimated
earnings |
|
|
|
|
50,173 |
|
|
|
38,820 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
227,562 |
|
|
|
182,813 |
|
Less billings
to date |
|
|
|
|
(156,357 |
) |
|
|
(140,039 |
) |
|
|
|
|
$ |
71,205 |
|
|
$ |
42,774 |
|
Costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings
on uncompleted contracts represents revenue earned under the percentage of completion method but not billable based on the terms of the contracts.
These amounts are billed based on the terms of the contracts, which include achievement of milestones, partial shipments or completion of the
contracts.
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004
|
|
2003
|
Finished
goods |
|
|
|
$ |
24,989 |
|
|
$ |
21,536 |
|
Raw
materials |
|
|
|
|
33,655 |
|
|
|
20,100 |
|
Materials and
supplies |
|
|
|
|
2,052 |
|
|
|
2,019 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
60,696 |
|
|
$ |
43,655 |
|
F-11
NORTHWEST PIPE COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollar amounts in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
| 4. |
|
PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT: |
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004
|
|
2003
|
Land and
improvements |
|
|
|
$ |
16,906 |
|
|
$ |
16,383 |
|
Buildings |
|
|
|
|
30,774 |
|
|
|
30,244 |
|
Equipment |
|
|
|
|
95,513 |
|
|
|
74,040 |
|
Equipment
under capital leases |
|
|
|
|
5,365 |
|
|
|
5,274 |
|
Construction
in progress |
|
|
|
|
2,571 |
|
|
|
13,323 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
151,129 |
|
|
|
139,264 |
|
Less
accumulated depreciation and
amortization |
|
|
|
|
(34,413 |
) |
|
|
(28,299 |
) |
Property and
equipment, net |
|
|
|
$ |
116,716 |
|
|
$ |
110,965 |
|
Depreciation expense was $6,203, $4,694 and $3,793
for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively. Accumulated amortization associated with property and equipment under capital
leases was $1,580 and $1,190 at December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively.
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004
|
|
2003
|
Goodwill |
|
|
|
$ |
23,717 |
|
|
$ |
23,717 |
|
Less
accumulated amortization |
|
|
|
|
(2,266 |
) |
|
|
(2,266 |
) |
Goodwill,
net |
|
|
|
$ |
21,451 |
|
|
$ |
21,451 |
|
| 6. |
|
NOTE PAYABLE TO FINANCIAL INSTITUTION: |
At December 31, 2004, the Company had a $38.5
million line of credit agreement, under which $28.4 million was outstanding. This resulted from $10.3 million bearing interest at 6.00% and $20.0
million bearing interest at 5.625%, partially offset by $1.9 million of cash receipts that had not been applied to the line of credit. At December 31,
2004, the Company had additional net borrowing capacity under the line of credit of $10.1 million. The line of credit expires on December 31, 2006, and
bears interest at rates related to LIBOR plus 2.25% to 3.50% (5.625% at December 31, 2004), or at prime minus 0.25% to prime plus 1.00% (6.0%
at December 31, 2004). The line of credit agreement contains the following covenants; minimum consolidated tangible net worth, maximum consolidated
total debt to consolidated EBITDA, minimum consolidated fixed charge coverage, and a limitation on credit agreement borrowings based on a borrowing
base formula that includes a certain portion of the Company’s accounts receivable, inventory and property and equipment. At December 31, 2004, the
Company was in compliance with all covenants specified in the line of credit agreement.
F-12
NORTHWEST PIPE COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollar amounts in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004
|
|
2003
|
Industrial
Development Bond, maturing on April 15, 2010, issued in accordance with Internal Revenue Code Section 144(a), variable interest (2.15% at December 31,
2004 and 1.35% at December 31, 2003) payable monthly; annual principal payments of $250, collateralized by property and equipment and guaranteed by an
irrevocable letter of credit from a bank |
|
|
|
$ |
1,500 |
|
|
$ |
1,750 |
|
Senior Notes,
maturing on November 15, 2007, due in annual payments of $5.0 million that began November 15, 2001, plus interest at 6.87% paid semi-annually, on May
15 and November 15, collateralized by all accounts receivable, inventory and certain equipment |
|
|
|
|
15,000 |
|
|
|
20,000 |
|
Series A
Senior Notes, maturing on April 1, 2005, due in annual payments of $1.4 million that began April 1, 1999, plus interest at 6.63% paid semi-annually, on
April 1 and October 1, collateralized by all accounts receivable, inventory and certain equipment |
|
|
|
|
1,428 |
|
|
|
2,857 |
|
Series B
Senior Notes, maturing on April 1, 2008, due in annual payments of $4.3 million that began April 1, 2002, plus interest at 6.91% paid semi-annually, on
April 1 and October 1, collateralized by all accounts receivable, inventory and certain equipment |
|
|
|
|
17,143 |
|
|
|
21,429 |
|
Series A Term
Note, maturing on February 25, 2014, due in annual payments of $2.1 million that begin February 25, 2008, plus interest at 8.75% paid quarterly, on
February 25, May 25, August 25, and November 25, collateralized by all accounts receivable, inventory and certain equipment |
|
|
|
|
15,000 |
|
|
|
— |
|
Series B Term
Notes, maturing on June 21, 2014, due in annual payments of $1.5 million that begin June 21, 2008, plus interest at 8.47% paid quarterly, on March 21,
June 21, September 21 and December 21, collateralized by all accounts receivable, inventory and certain equipment |
|
|
|
|
10,500 |
|
|
|
— |
|
Series C Term
Notes, maturing on October 26, 2014, due in annual payments of $1.4 million that begin October 26, 2008, plus interest at 7.36% paid quarterly, on
January 26, April 26, July 26 and October 26, collateralized by all accounts receivable, inventory and certain equipment |
|
|
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
|
— |
|
Total
long-term debt |
|
|
|
$ |
70,571 |
|
|
$ |
46,036 |
|
Amounts are
displayed on the consolidated balance sheet as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
portion of long-term debt |
|
|
|
$ |
10,964 |
|
|
$ |
10,964 |
|
Long-term
debt, less current portion |
|
|
|
|
59,607 |
|
|
|
35,072 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
70,571 |
|
|
$ |
46,036 |
|
The Company is required to maintain certain
financial ratios under its long-term debt agreements, including the following covenants; minimum consolidated tangible net worth, maximum consolidated
total debt to consolidated EBITDA, a minimum consolidated fixed charge coverage test and a limitation on credit agreement borrowings based on a
borrowing base formula that includes a certain portion of our accounts receivable, inventory and property and equipment. At December 31, 2004, the
Company was in compliance with all covenants specified in its long-term debt agreements.
F-13
NORTHWEST PIPE COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollar amounts in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
7. LONG-TERM DEBT: (Continued)
Future principal payments are as
follows:
2005 |
|
|
|
$ |
10,964 |
|
2006 |
|
|
|
|
9,536 |
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
9,536 |
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
9,606 |
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
5,321 |
|
Thereafter |
|
|
|
|
25,608 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
70,571 |
|
Interest expense was $6,346 in 2004. Interest
expense was $5,210, net of amounts capitalized of $89 in 2003, and interest expense was $5,549 in 2002.
Capital Leases
The Company leases certain hardware and software
related to a company-wide enterprise resource planning system and other equipment. The future minimum lease payments under these capital leases and the
present value of the minimum lease payments as of December 31, 2004 are as follows:
2005 |
|
|
|
$ |
859 |
|
2006 |
|
|
|
|
78 |
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
7 |
|
Total minimum
lease payments |
|
|
|
|
944 |
|
Less—Amount representing interest |
|
|
|
|
39 |
|
Present value
of minimum lease payments with interest rates of 7.7% |
|
|
|
|
905 |
|
Current
portion of capital lease |
|
|
|
|
823 |
|
Capital lease
obligation, less current portion |
|
|
|
$ |
82 |
|
Operating Leases
The Company has entered into various equipment
leases with terms of six years or less. Total rental expense for 2004, 2003 and 2002 was $14,478, $14,145 and $11,773, respectively. Future minimum
payments as of December 31, 2004 for operating leases with initial or remaining terms in excess of one year are:
2005 |
|
|
|
$ |
7,929 |
|
2006 |
|
|
|
|
7,269 |
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
3,846 |
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
1,536 |
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
1,018 |
|
Thereafter |
|
|
|
|
288 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
21,886 |
|
In the third quarter of 2002, the Company completed
sales-leasebacks of certain manufacturing equipment for $3.5 million. The lengths of the leases are from thirty-six to eighty-four months. On December
15, 2002, the Company repurchased certain manufacturing equipment that was included in a June 29, 2001 sale-leaseback transactions. Also, on December
15, 2002 the Company completed a new sale-leaseback transaction for $24.9 million that included a portion of the repurchased manufacturing equipment.
The length of the new sale-leaseback is forty-eight months and includes options beginning after the basic lease term of twenty-four months to
terminate, purchase or continue to rent through the term length. The Company recognized an additional net deferred gain of
F-14
NORTHWEST PIPE COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollar amounts in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
8. LEASES: (Continued)
$5.6 million as a result of the new sale-leaseback. The deferred gain that will be amortized over the basic lease term of twenty-four months is limited
by the maximum guaranteed residual amount.
Certain of the Company’s operating lease
agreements include renewals and/or purchase options set to expire at various dates. In addition, certain manufacturing equipment leases, with terms of
3 years, contain provisions related to residual value guarantees, which provide that if the Company does not purchase the leased equipment from the
lessor at the end of the lease term, then the Company is liable to the lessor for an amount equal to the shortage (if any) between the proceeds from
the sale of the equipment and an agreed value. The maximum potential liability to the Company under such guarantees is $20.5 million at December 31,
2004 if the proceeds from the sale of terminating equipment leases are zero. Consistent with past experience, management does not expect any
significant payments will be required pursuant to these guarantees, and no amounts have been accrued at December 31, 2004.
The Company has a defined contribution retirement
plan that covers substantially all of its employees and provides for Company matches of up to 50% of employee contributions to the plan, subject to
certain limitations. The defined contribution retirement plan offers ten investment options and does not include provisions to invest in or have the
Company match in Company stock.
The Company has a non-qualified retirement savings
plan that covers the officers and selected highly compensated employees. The non-qualified plan matches up to 50% of employee contributions to the
plan, subject to certain limitations. It also provides a Company funded component for the officers with a retirement target fund. The retirement target
fund amount is an actuarially estimated amount necessary to provide 35% of final base pay after a 35-year career with the Company or 1% of final base
pay per year of service. The actual benefit, however, assumes an investment growth at 8% per year. Should the investment growth be greater than 8%, the
benefit will be more, but if it is less than 8%, the amount will be less and the Company does not make up any deficiency.
The Company also has two noncontributory defined
benefit plans, a union and a salaried benefit plan. Both plans are frozen, and participants are fully vested in their accrued benefits as of the date
each plan was frozen. No additional participants can be added to the plans and no additional service can be earned by participants subsequent to date
the plans were frozen. Benefits under the union pension plan are based upon a flat benefit formula, while benefits under the salaried benefit plan are
based upon a final pay formula. The funding policy for each noncontributory defined benefit plan is based on current plan costs plus amortization of
the unfunded plan liability. All current employees covered by these plans are now covered by the defined contribution retirement plan. As of December
31, 2004 and 2003, the Company has recorded, in accordance with the actuarial valuation, a prepaid asset of $1,204 and $1,071, respectively, and an
accrued pension liability of $1,934 and $817, respectively. Additionally, as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, the accumulated benefit obligation was
$4,781 and $3,912, respectively, and the fair value of plan assets was $4,052 and $3,767, respectively.
Total expense for all retirement plans in 2004, 2003
and 2002 was $951, $894 and $983, respectively.
| 10. |
|
STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION PLANS: |
Employee Stock Purchase Plan
The Company had an Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the
“ESPP”), which allowed employees of the Company to purchase shares of the Company’s common stock through accumulated payroll deductions.
The ESPP was discontinued after the May 1, 2002 offering period. Participating employees could have elected to contribute up to 10% of their eligible
compensation, subject to certain limitations, during each pay period to the ESPP. The ESPP provided for two semi-annual offering periods beginning May
1 and November 1 of each year. Participant funds
F-15
NORTHWEST PIPE COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollar amounts in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
10. STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION PLANS:
(Continued)
were accumulated during the offering period and
used to automatically purchase shares of the Company’s common stock at 85% of the lower of the fair market value of such stock at the beginning of
the offering period or the fair market value at the purchase date. The Company had made 300,000 shares of common stock available for sale under the
ESPP and had issued 47,662 shares as of December 31, 2002.
Stock Option Plans
The Company has two stock option plans for employees
and directors. The Amended 1995 Stock Incentive Plan provides for the grant of incentive options at an exercise price, which is 100 percent of the fair
value of the Company’s stock on the date of grant. The 1995 Stock Option Plan for Nonemployee Directors provides for the grant of nonqualified
options at an exercise price, which is not less than 100 percent of the fair value on the grant date. The plans provide that options become exercisable
according to vesting schedules, which range from immediate for nonemployee directors to ratably over a 60-month period for all other options. Options
terminate 10 years from the date of grant. Although there were 893,576, 1,019,387 and 1,030,893 shares of common stock reserved for issuance under the
Company’s stock compensation plans at December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002 respectively, the Company no longer intends to grant options to employees
going forward, and will be granting a limited number of options to directors each year for services performed.
A summary of status of the Company’s stock
options as of December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002 and changes during the year ended on those dates is presented below:
|
|
|
|
Options
Outstanding
|
|
Weighted Average
Exercise Price
Per Share
|
Balance,
December 31, 2001 |
|
|
|
|
962,977 |
|
|
$ |
13.62 |
|
Options
granted |
|
|
|
|
66,357 |
|
|
|
17.90 |
|
Options
exercised |
|
|
|
|
(24,967 |
) |
|
|
3.74 |
|
Options
canceled |
|
|
|
|
(7,397 |
) |
|
|
15.50 |
|
Balance,
December 31, 2002 |
|
|
|
|
996,970 |
|
|
|
14.13 |
|
Options
granted |
|
|
|
|
15,000 |
|
|
|
10.31 |
|
Options
exercised |
|
|
|
|
(11,506 |
) |
|
|
3.04 |
|
Options
canceled |
|
|
|
|
(17,607 |
) |
|
|
16.33 |
|
Balance,
December 31, 2003 |
|
|
|
|
982,857 |
|
|
|
14.17 |
|
Options
granted |
|
|
|
|
8,000 |
|
|
|
14.00 |
|
Options
exercised |
|
|
|
|
(125,811 |
) |
|
|
7.38 |
|
Options
canceled |
|
|
|
|
(5,581 |
) |
|
|
16.74 |
|
Balance,
December 31, 2004 |
|
|
|
|
859,465 |
|
|
$ |
15.14 |
|
F-16
NORTHWEST PIPE COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollar amounts in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
10. STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION PLANS:
(Continued)
The following table summarizes information about
stock options outstanding at December 31, 2004:
Options Outstanding
|
|
Options Exercisable
|
Range of
Exercise Prices
Per Share
|
|
|
|
Number of
Options
|
|
Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Life (years)
|
|
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
Per Share
|
|
Number of
Options
|
|
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
Per Share
|
$ 4.78 – $10.31 |
|
|
|
|
80,926 |
|
|
|
1.94 |
|
|
$ |
5.81 |
|
|
|
80,926 |
|
|
$ |
5.81 |
|
$10.63 – $13.56 |
|
|
|
|
166,484 |
|
|
|
5.28 |
|
|
|
13.46 |
|
|
|
152,997 |
|
|
|
13.45 |
|
$14.00 – $14.56 |
|
|
|
|
159,103 |
|
|
|
6.44 |
|
|
|
14.02 |
|
|
|
115,959 |
|
|
|
14.03 |
|
$14.75 – $17.13 |
|
|
|
|
156,162 |
|
|
|
3.98 |
|
|
|
14.88 |
|
|
|
156,162 |
|
|
|
14.88 |
|
$17.90 – $18.75 |
|
|
|
|
195,601 |
|
|
|
3.74 |
|
|
|
18.49 |
|
|
|
170,405 |
|
|
|
18.58 |
|
$18.88 – $22.88 |
|
|
|
|
101,189 |
|
|
|
3.13 |
|
|
|
21.07 |
|
|
|
101,189 |
|
|
|
21.07 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
859,465 |
|
|
|
4.34 |
|
|
$ |
15.14 |
|
|
|
777,638 |
|
|
$ |
15.14 |
|
The following are the options exercisable at the
corresponding weighted average exercise price at December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively: 777,638 at $15.14, 817,446 at $14.04 and
718,075 at $14.13.
In accordance with SFAS 123, “Accounting for
Stock Based Compensation”, pro forma disclosures as if the Company adopted the cost recognition requirements under SFAS 123 are presented in Note
1. The fair value of options granted in 2004, 2003 and 2002 was estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the
following assumptions:
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004
|
|
2003
|
|
2002
|
Risk-free
interest rate |
|
|
|
|
4.50 |
% |
|
|
3.06 |
% |
|
|
4.76 |
% |
Expected
dividend yield |
|
|
|
|
0 |
% |
|
|
0 |
% |
|
|
0 |
% |
Expected
volatility |
|
|
|
|
45.92 |
% |
|
|
47.52 |
% |
|
|
47.93 |
% |
Expected
lives (years) |
|
|
|
|
7.83 |
|
|
|
6.79 |
|
|
|
6.49 |
|
The weighted average grant date fair value of
options granted during 2004, 2003 and 2002 was $8.98, $5.35 and $9.66, respectively. No ESPP shares were issued in 2004 or 2003, and the weighted
average purchase price and weighted average fair value of shares issued under the ESPP in 2002 were $11.94 and $14.05, respectively.
| 11. |
|
SHAREHOLDER RIGHTS PLAN: |
In June 1999, the Board of Directors adopted a
Shareholder Rights Plan (the “Plan”) designed to ensure fair and equal treatment for all shareholders in the event of a proposed acquisition
of the Company by enhancing the ability of the Board of Directors to negotiate more effectively with a prospective acquirer, and reserved 150,000
shares of Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock (“Preferred Stock”) for purposes of the Plan. In connection with the adoption of the
Plan, the Board of Directors declared a dividend distribution of one preferred stock purchase right (a “Right”) per share of common stock,
payable to shareholders of record on July 9, 2000. Each right represents the right to purchase one one-hundredth of a share of Preferred Stock at a
price of $83.00, subject to adjustment. The Rights will be exercisable only if a person or group acquires, or commences a tender offer to acquire, 15%
or more of the Company’s outstanding shares of common stock. Subject to the terms of the Plan and upon the occurrence of certain events, each
Right would entitle the holder to purchase common stock of the Company, or of an acquiring company in certain circumstances, having a market value
equal to two times the exercise price of the Right. The Company may redeem the Rights at a price of $0.01 per Right under certain
circumstances.
F-17
NORTHWEST PIPE COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollar amounts in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
| 12. |
|
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES: |
Litigation
The Company was a defendant in a suit brought by
Foothill/DeAnza Community College in U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California in July 2000. Two companies that the Company acquired
in 1998 and subsequently merged into it were also named as defendants. DeAnza represented a class of plaintiffs who purchased small diameter, thin
walled fire sprinkler pipe sold as the “Poz-Lok” system that plaintiffs alleged was defectively manufactured and sold by the defendants
between the early 1990s and early 2000. DeAnza alleged that the pipe leaked necessitating replacement of the fire sprinkler system and further alleged
that the leaks caused damage to other property as well as loss of use. The Company answered the complaint, denied liability and specifically denied
that class certification was appropriate. On July 1, 2002, the Court certified a class of facility owners in six states (California, Washington,
Arizona, Oregon, Idaho and Nevada), on claims of breach of express warranty, fraud and unfair trade practices. The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals
denied the Company’s petition for review. The Company filed a Declaratory Relief action against its insurers seeking defense and indemnification.
The Company also filed an action against the former owner of the two companies it acquired in 1998, seeking damages for fees and indemnification. The
Company settled with the plaintiffs, the insurance companies, and the former owner. Following a hearing on June 7, 2004, the Court entered a final
order and judgment, which approved a nationwide opt-out class. The 30-day appeal period expired on July 7, 2004, and no one appealed. Pursuant to the
settlement, the Company is obligated to pay only those class members who had an actual qualifying leak in their Poz-Lok systems, supported by
documentation of the leak and those who have a qualifying leak in the future, again, supported by documentation, as well as an inspection report
verifying the existence of the leak and lack of alternative cause, such as misuse, improper installation, or microbiologically influenced corrosion
(“MIC”). Class members may make a claim during a fifteen year period measured from the final effective date of the settlement (July 7, 2004),
but any compensation for the leak, between $10 and $30 per foot of necessary pipe to effectuate repair and any consequential damages, would be reduced
on a proportionate basis measured from the date such system was installed. Alternatively, the class member could receive $500 and receive no further
compensation. The Company’s insurance carriers have paid $5.0 million to cover the initial costs of settlement administration, class notice costs
and plaintiff’s attorney fees, with an estimated $2.4 million remaining to pay claims. The Company’s payment obligations do not begin until
the insurance funds are exhausted. During the second year and years four through fifteen, the Company would be obligated only to pay qualifying claims
and administrative costs up to a limit of $500,000 per year. The Company has no payment obligations in years one and three. The Company also would have
no payment obligation in any other year in which there are no qualifying claims. In the event any qualifying claims remain unpaid after fifteen years,
the Company would have to pay such claims as follows: (1) if the excess claims are between $0 and $1.5 million, the Company would pay the amount of the
claims; (2) if the excess claims are between $1.5 million and $6.0 million, the Company would pay $1.5 million; and (3) if the excess claims exceed
$6.0 million, the Company would pay $1.5 million plus 25 percent of the amount over $6.0 million, up to a cap of $3.0 million; provided, that in no
event would the Company be obligated to pay any more than $1.0 million in any of years sixteen, seventeen or eighteen. To date, the Company is aware of
seven claims, one of which has been denied and six of which are pending. Of the six pending claims, one seeks an inspection to determine the extent of
any leaks, and the remaining claims have a total maximum exposure of less than $100,000.
The Company’s manufacturing facilities are
subject to many federal, state, local and foreign laws and regulations related to the protection of the environment. Some of the Company’s
operations require environmental permits to control and reduce air and water discharges or manage other environmental matters, which are subject to
modification, renewal and revocation by government authorities. The Company believes that it is in material compliance with all environmental laws,
regulations and permits, and it does not anticipate any material expenditures to meet current or pending environmental requirements. However, it could
incur operating costs or capital expenditures in complying with future or more stringent environmental requirements or with current requirements if it
is applied to its facilities in a way it does not anticipate.
F-18
NORTHWEST PIPE COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollar amounts in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
12. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES:
(Continued)
In November 1999, the Oregon Department of
Environmental Quality (DEQ) requested that the Company perform a preliminary assessment of its plant located at 12005 N. Burgard in Portland, Oregon.
The primary purpose of the assessment is to determine whether the plant has contributed to sediment contamination in the Willamette River. The Company
entered into a voluntary letter agreement with the department in mid-August 2000. In 2001, groundwater containing elevated volatile organic compounds
(VOCs) was identified in one localized area of the property furthest from the river. Assessment work in 2002 and 2003 to further characterize the
groundwater is consistent with the initial conclusion that the source of the VOCs is located off site. There is no evidence at this time showing a
connection between detected VOCs in groundwater and Willamette River sediments. Also, there is no evidence to date that stormwater from the plant has
adversely impacted Willamette River sediments. However, DEQ is recommending a remedial investigation and feasibility study for further evaluation of
both groundwater and stormwater at the plant. Assessment work is ongoing.
In December 2000, a six-mile section of the lower
Willamette River known as the Portland Harbor was included on the National Priorities List at the request of the EPA. The EPA currently describes the
site as the areal extent of contamination, and all suitable areas in proximity to the contamination necessary for the implementation of the response
action, at, from and to the Portland Harbor Superfund Site Assessment Area from approximately River Mile 3.5 to River Mile 9.2, including uplands
portions of the site that contain sources of contamination to the sediments. The Company’s plant is not located on the Willamette River; it lies
in what may be the upland portion of the site. However, a final determination of the areal extent of the site will not be determined until EPA issues a
record of decision describing the remedial action necessary to address Willamette River sediments. EPA and the Oregon Department of Environmental
Quality have agreed to share responsibility for investigation and cleanup of the site. The Oregon Department of Environmental Quality has the lead
responsibility for conducting the upland work, and EPA is the Support Agency for that work. EPA has the lead responsibility for conducting in-water
work, and the Oregon Department of Environmental Quality is the Support Agency for that work.
Also, in December 2000, EPA notified the Company and
68 other parties by general notice letter of potential liability under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act and the
Resource Conservation and Recovery Act with respect to the Portland Harbor Superfund Site. In its letter, EPA inquired whether parties receiving the
letter were interested in volunteering to enter negotiations to perform a remedial investigation and feasibility study at the site. No action was
required by EPA of recipients of the general notice letter. In the last week of December 2000, the Company responded to EPA’s inquiry stating that
it was working with the Oregon Department of Environmental Quality to determine whether its plant had any impact on Willamette River sediments or was a
current source of releases to the Willamette River sediments. Therefore, until the Company’s work with the Oregon Department of Environmental
Quality is completed, it would be premature for the Company to enter into any negotiations with EPA.
The Company operates under numerous governmental
permits and licenses relating to air emissions, stormwater run-off, and other matters. The Company is not aware of any current material violations or
citations relating to any of these permits or licenses. It has a policy of reducing consumption of hazardous materials in its operations by
substituting non-hazardous materials when possible. The Company’s operations are also governed by many other laws and regulations, including those
relating to workplace safety and worker health, principally the Occupational Safety and Health Act and regulations thereunder which, among other
requirements, establish noise and dust standards. The Company believes that it is in material compliance with these laws and regulations and does not
believe that future compliance with such laws and regulations will have a material adverse effect on its results of operations or financial
condition.
From time to time, the Company is involved in
litigation relating to claims arising out of its operations in the normal course of its business. The Company maintains insurance coverage against
potential claims in amounts that it believes to be adequate. Management believes that it is not presently a party to any other litigation, the outcome
of which would have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition, results of operations or cash
flows.
F-19
NORTHWEST PIPE COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollar amounts in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
12. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES:
(Continued)
Commitments
As of December 31, 2004, the Company had outstanding
raw material purchase commitments of approximately $14.9 million.
Guarantees
The Company has entered into certain stand-by
letters of credit that total $5.3 million. The stand-by letters of credit relate to workers’ compensation, general liability insurance, and the
Industrial Revenue Bond.
The components of the provision for income taxes are
as follows:
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004
|
|
2003
|
|
2002
|
Current:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal |
|
|
|
$ |
5,927 |
|
|
$ |
(1,121 |
) |
|
$ |
3,430 |
|
State |
|
|
|
|
(142 |
) |
|
|
(131 |
) |
|
|
700 |
|
Deferred:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal |
|
|
|
|
876 |
|
|
|
2,750 |
|
|
|
1,661 |
|
State |
|
|
|
|
786 |
|
|
|
696 |
|
|
|
190 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
7,447 |
|
|
$ |
2,194 |
|
|
$ |
5,981 |
|
The difference between the effective income tax rate
and the statutory U.S. Federal income tax rate is explained as follows:
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004
|
|
2003
|
|
2002
|
Provision at
statutory rate |
|
|
|
$ |
6,938 |
|
|
$ |
2,004 |
|
|
$ |
5,334 |
|
State
provision, net of federal benefit |
|
|
|
|
846 |
|
|
|
372 |
|
|
|
478 |
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
(337 |
) |
|
|
(182 |
) |
|
|
169 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
7,447 |
|
|
$ |
2,194 |
|
|
$ |
5,981 |
|
F-20
NORTHWEST PIPE COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollar amounts in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
13. INCOME TAXES: (Continued)
The tax effect of temporary differences that give
rise to significant portions of deferred tax assets and liabilities are presented below:
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004
|
|
2003
|
Current
deferred tax assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventories |
|
|
|
$ |
1,537 |
|
|
$ |
799 |
|
Accrued
employee benefits |
|
|
|
|
1,143 |
|
|
|
538 |
|
Trade
receivables, net |
|
|
|
|
482 |
|
|
|
321 |
|
Net operating
loss carryforwards |
|
|
|
|
132 |
|
|
|
365 |
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,294 |
|
|
|
2,032 |
|
Current
deferred tax liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prepaid
expenses |
|
|
|
|
(246 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
(429 |
) |
|
|
(421 |
) |
Current
deferred tax assets, net |
|
|
|
$ |
2,619 |
|
|
$ |
1,611 |
|
Noncurrent
deferred tax assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net operating
loss carryforwards |
|
|
|
$ |
1,006 |
|
|
$ |
880 |
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
128 |
|
|
|
129 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,134 |
|
|
|
1,009 |
|
Valuation
allowance |
|
|
|
|
(478 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
|
|
656 |
|
|
|
1,009 |
|
Noncurrent
deferred tax liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and
equipment |
|
|
|
|
(23,708 |
) |
|
|
(21,391 |
) |
Noncurrent
deferred tax liabilities, net |
|
|
|
$ |
(23,052 |
) |
|
$ |
(20,382 |
) |
Net deferred
tax liabilities |
|
|
|
$ |
(20,433 |
) |
|
$ |
(18,771 |
) |
As of December 31, 2004, the Company had
approximately $2.1 million of federal net operating loss carryforwards and $6.8 million of state net operating loss carryforwards as a result of the
acquisition of Thompson Pipe and Steel, which are limited in their use to approximately $348 per year during the 15 year carryforward period which
expires in 2010. During the year ended December 31, 2004, the Company recorded a $478 valuation allowance related to the state net operating loss
carryforwards. As it was considered more likely than not the benefits would not be realized, the valuation allowance was recorded based upon current
and anticipated future taxable income, state tax rates, and state apportionment.
On October 22, 2004, the President signed the
American Jobs Creation Act of 2004 (the “Act”). The Act provides a deduction for income from qualified domestic production activities, which
will be phased in from 2005 through 2010. In return, the Act also provides for a two-year phase-out of the existing extra-territorial income exclusion
(ETI) for foreign sales that was viewed to be inconsistent with international trade protocols by the European Union. The Company expects the net effect
of the phase out of the ETI and the phase in of this new deduction to result in a decrease in the effective tax rate, based on current earnings
levels.
Under the guidance in FASB Staff Position No. FAS
109-1, “Application of FASB Statement No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes, to the Tax Deduction on Qualified Production Activities Provided by
the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004,” the deduction will be treated as a “special deduction” as described in FASB Statement No. 109.
As such, the special deduction has no effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities existing at the enactment date. Rather, the impact of this
deduction will be reported in the period in which the deduction is claimed on the Company’s tax return.
F-21
NORTHWEST PIPE COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollar amounts in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
The Company has adopted SFAS No. 131,
“Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information” which requires disclosure of financial and descriptive information
about the Company’s reportable operating segments. The operating segments reported below are based on the nature of the products sold by the
Company and are the segments of the Company for which separate financial information is available and for which operating results are regularly
evaluated by executive management to make decisions about resources to be allocated to the segment and assess its performance. Management evaluates
segment performance based on segment gross profit. There were no material transfers between segments in the periods presented.
The Company’s water transmission segment
manufactures and markets large diameter, high-pressure steel pipe used primarily for water transmission. Water Transmission products are custom
manufactured in accordance with project specifications and are used primarily for high-pressure water transmission pipelines in the United States,
Canada, and Mexico. Water Transmission products are manufactured in Portland, Oregon; Denver, Colorado; Adelanto and Riverside, California;
Parkersburg, West Virginia and Saginaw, Texas facilities and are sold primarily to public water agencies either directly or through an installation
contractor.
The Company’s tubular products segment
manufactures and markets smaller diameter, electric resistance welded steel pipe for use in a wide range of construction, agricultural, energy and
industrial applications. Tubular Products are manufactured in the Company’s Portland, Oregon; Atchison, Kansas; Houston, Texas; Bossier City,
Louisiana; and Monterrey, Mexico facilities. Tubular Products are marketed through a network of direct sales force personnel and independent
distributors throughout the United States and Canada.
Based on the location of the customer, the Company
sold products in the United States, Canada and Mexico. As of December 31, 2004, all material long-lived assets are located in the United
States.
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004
|
|
2003
|
|
2002
|
Net
sales:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Water
transmission |
|
|
|
$ |
177,765 |
|
|
$ |
146,317 |
|
|
$ |
174,549 |
|
Tubular
products |
|
|
|
|
114,145 |
|
|
|
98,670 |
|
|
|
91,552 |
|
Total |
|
|
|
$ |
291,910 |
|
|
$ |
244,987 |
|
|
$ |
266,101 |
|
Gross
profit:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Water
transmission |
|
|
|
$ |
33,863 |
|
|
$ |
32,173 |
|
|
$ |
38,367 |
|
Tubular
products |
|
|
|
|
15,433 |
|
|
|
1,055 |
|
|
|
5,562 |
|
Total |
|
|
|
$ |
49,296 |
|
|
$ |
33,228 |
|
|
$ |
43,929 |
|
Interest
expense, net:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Water
transmission |
|
|
|
$ |
3,547 |
|
|
$ |
3,447 |
|
|
$ |
4,147 |
|
Tubular
products |
|
|
|
|
2,799 |
|
|
|
1,763 |
|
|
|
1,402 |
|
Total |
|
|
|
$ |
6,346 |
|
|
$ |
5,210 |
|
|
$ |
5,549 |
|
Depreciation
and amortization of property
and equipment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Water
transmission |
|
|
|
$ |
2,380 |
|
|
$ |
2,033 |
|
|
$ |
1,885 |
|
Tubular
products |
|
|
|
|
2,847 |
|
|
|
1,766 |
|
|
|
1,129 |
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
5,227 |
|
|
|
3,799 |
|
|
|
3,014 |
|
Corporate |
|
|
|
|
976 |
|
|
|
895 |
|
|
|
779 |
|
Total |
|
|
|
$ |
6,203 |
|
|
$ |
4,694 |
|
|
$ |
3,793 |
|
F-22
NORTHWEST PIPE COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollar amounts in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
14. SEGMENT INFORMATION: (Continued)
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004
|
|
2003
|
|
2002
|
Capital
expenditures:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Water
transmission |
|
|
|
$ |
6,977 |
|
|
$ |
2,983 |
|
|
$ |
10,257 |
|
Tubular
products |
|
|
|
|
4,813 |
|
|
|
7,959 |
|
|
|
17,754 |
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
11,790 |
|
|
|
10,942 |
|
|
|
28,011 |
|
Corporate |
|
|
|
|
205 |
|
|
|
173 |
|
|
|
812 |
|
Total |
|
|
|
$ |
11,995 |
|
|
$ |
11,115 |
|
|
$ |
28,823 |
|
Net sales by
geographic area:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United
States |
|
|
|
$ |
275,445 |
|
|
$ |
234,603 |
|
|
$ |
260,724 |
|
Canada and
Other |
|
|
|
|
16,465 |
|
|
|
10,384 |
|
|
|
5,377 |
|
Total |
|
|
|
$ |
291,910 |
|
|
$ |
244,987 |
|
|
$ |
266,101 |
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004
|
|
2003
|
Total
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Water
transmission |
|
|
|
$ |
192,222 |
|
|
$ |
149,200 |
|
Tubular
products |
|
|
|
|
127,598 |
|
|
|
114,959 |
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
319,820 |
|
|
|
264,159 |
|
Corporate |
|
|
|
|
15,583 |
|
|
|
15,851 |
|
Total |
|
|
|
$ |
335,403 |
|
|
$ |
280,010 |
|
No one customer represented more than 10% of total
sales in 2004, 2003 or 2002.
| 15. |
|
RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS: |
The Company has ongoing business relationships with
certain affiliates of Wells Fargo & Company (“Wells Fargo”). Wells Fargo, together with certain of its affiliates, is the Company’s
largest shareholder. During the year ended December 31, 2004, the Company has made the following payments to affiliates of Wells Fargo: (i) capital and
operating lease payments pursuant to which the Company leases certain equipment from such affiliates, (ii) payments of interest and fees pursuant to
letters of credit originated by such affiliates, (iii) payments of principal and interest on an industrial development bond, and (iv) payments of
principal, interest and related fees in connection with loan agreements between the Company and such affiliates. Payments made by the Company to Wells
Fargo and its affiliates amounted to $3.5 million, $3.9 million and $2.0 million for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively.
Balances due to Wells Fargo and its affiliates were $30.9 million and $33.1 million at December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively.
F-23
NORTHWEST PIPE COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollar amounts in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
| 16. |
|
QUARTERLY DATA (UNAUDITED): |
Summarized quarterly financial data for 2004 and
2003 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
First
Quarter
|
|
Second
Quarter
|
|
Third
Quarter
|
|
Fourth
Quarter
|
2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
sales:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Water
transmission |
|
|
|
$ |
36,297 |
|
|
$ |
37,615 |
|
|
$ |
46,242 |
|
|
$ |
57,611 |
|
Tubular
products |
|
|
|
|
30,425 |
|
|
|
32,020 |
|
|
|
29,022 |
|
|
|
22,678 |
|
Total net
sales |
|
|
|
$ |
66,722 |
|
|
$ |
69,635 |
|
|
$ |
75,264 |
|
|
$ |
80,289 |
|
|
Gross
profit:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Water
transmission |
|
|
|
$ |
6,642 |
|
|
$ |
7,227 |
|
|
$ |
8,920 |
|
|
$ |
11,074 |
|
Tubular
products |
|
|
|
|
1,786 |
|
|
|
4,645 |
|
|
|
5,152 |
|
|
|
3,850 |
|
Total gross
profit |
|
|
|
$ |
8,428 |
|
|
$ |
11,872 |
|
|
$ |
14,072 |
|
|
$ |
14,924 |
|
|
Net
income |
|
|
|
$ |
1,147 |
|
|
$ |
3,046 |
|
|
$ |
3,938 |
|
|
$ |
4,246 |
|
|
Earnings per
share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
|
$ |
0.17 |
|
|
$ |
0.46 |
|
|
$ |
0.59 |
|
|
$ |
0.64 |
|
Diluted |
|
|
|
$ |
0.17 |
|
|
$ |
0.45 |
|
|
$ |
0.58 |
|
|
$ |
0.62 |
|
|
2003
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
sales:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Water
transmission |
|
|
|
$ |
35,258 |
|
|
$ |
36,713 |
|
|
$ |
39,705 |
|
|
$ |
34,641 |
|
Tubular
products |
|
|
|
|
22,402 |
|
|
|
24,816 |
|
|
|
27,018 |
|
|
|
24,434 |
|
Total net
sales |
|
|
|
$ |
57,660 |
|
|
$ |
61,529 |
|
|
$ |
66,723 |
|
|
$ |
59,075 |
|
|
Gross profit
(loss):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Water
transmission |
|
|
|
$ |
7,466 |
|
|
$ |
7,437 |
|
|
$ |
9,333 |
|
|
$ |
7,937 |
|
Tubular
products |
|
|
|
|
(932 |
) |
|
|
383 |
|
|
|
857 |
|
|
|
747 |
|
Total gross
profit |
|
|
|
$ |
6,534 |
|
|
$ |
7,820 |
|
|
$ |
10,190 |
|
|
$ |
8,684 |
|
|
Net income
(loss) |
|
|
|
$ |
(318 |
) |
|
$ |
437 |
|
|
$ |
2,055 |
|
|
$ |
1,357 |
|
|
Earnings
(loss) per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
|
$ |
(0.05 |
) |
|
$ |
0.07 |
|
|
$ |
0.31 |
|
|
$ |
0.21 |
|
Diluted |
|
|
|
$ |
(0.05 |
) |
|
$ |
0.06 |
|
|
$ |
0.31 |
|
|
$ |
0.20 |
|
F-24
Schedule II
NORTHWEST PIPE COMPANY
VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
(Dollars in
thousands)
|
|
|
|
Balance at
Beginning of
Period
|
|
Charged to
Profit and
Loss
|
|
Deduction
from Reserves
|
|
Balance at
Close of
Period
|
Year ended
December 31, 2004:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for
doubtful accounts |
|
|
|
$ |
831 |
|
|
$ |
1,274 |
|
|
$ |
884 |
|
|
$ |
1,221 |
|
Year ended
December 31, 2003:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for
doubtful accounts |
|
|
|
$ |
1,100 |
|
|
$ |
1,040 |
|
|
$ |
1,309 |
|
|
$ |
831 |
|
Year ended
December 31, 2002:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for
doubtful accounts |
|
|
|
$ |
573 |
|
|
$ |
1,270 |
|
|
$ |
743 |
|
|
$ |
1,100 |
|
S-1
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly
authorized, on the 11th day of March 2005.
NORTHWEST PIPE COMPANY
By |
|
/s/ BRIAN W. DUNHAM
Brian W.
Dunham
Chief Executive Officer |
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant in the capacities indicated, on the 11th
day of March 2005.
Signature
|
|
|
|
Title
|
/s/ WILLIAM R.
TAGMYER
William R. Tagmyer |
|
|
|
Director and Chairman of the Board |
/s/ BRIAN W.
DUNHAM
Brian W. Dunham |
|
|
|
Director, President and Chief Executive Officer |
/s/ JOHN D.
MURAKAMI
John D. Murakami |
|
|
|
Vice
President and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer) |
/s/ WAYNE B.
KINGSLEY
Wayne B. Kingsley |
|
|
|
Director |
/s/ NEIL R.
THORNTON
Neil R. Thornton |
|
|
|
Director |
/s/ MICHAEL C.
FRANSON
Michael C. Franson |
|
|
|
Director |
/s/ RICHARD A.
ROMAN
Richard A. Roman |
|
|
|
Director |