Back to GetFilings.com
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, DC 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
|X| QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934.
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2005
OR
|_| TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934.
For the transition period from __________ to __________
Commission file number 000-25277
PACIFIC MAGTRON INTERNATIONAL CORP.
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
Nevada 88-0353141
(State or Other Jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer
Incorporation or Organization) Identification No.)
1600 California Circle, Milpitas, California 95035
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
(408) 956-8888
(Registrant's Telephone Number, Including Area Code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports
required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such
filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes |X| No |_|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as
defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes |_| No |X|
Common Stock, $0.001 par value per share:
10,485,100 shares issued and outstanding at May 4, 2005
Part I. - Condensed Financial Information
Item 1. - Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
Condensed consolidated balance sheets as of
March 31, 2005 (Unaudited) and December 31, 2004 1
Condensed consolidated statements of operations for
the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004 (Unaudited) 2
Condensed consolidated statements of cash flows for
the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004
(Unaudited) 3
Notes to condensed consolidated financial statements
(Unaudited) 4-13
Item 2. - Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations 14-25
Item 3. - Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About
Market Risk 25
Item 4. - Controls and Procedures 25
Part II - Other Information
Item 1. - Legal Proceedings 26
Item 6. - Exhibits 26
Signature 27
PACIFIC MAGTRON INTERNATIONAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
March 31, December 31,
2005 2004
(Unaudited)
--------------- ---------------
ASSETS
Current Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents $ 1,115,900 $ 543,800
Restricted cash -- 255,000
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for
doubtful accounts of $335,700 and
$310,700 in 2005 and 2004, respectively 2,252,600 3,661,100
Inventories 343,300 2,488,900
Prepaid expenses and other current
assets 147,500 146,800
Assets from discontinued operations 196,100 435,900
--------------- ---------------
Total Current Assets 4,055,400 7,531,500
Property and equipment, net 3,749,200 3,906,700
Restricted cash 238,400 250,000
Other assets 12,800 16,200
Assets from discontinued operations 15,800 36,300
--------------- ---------------
$ 8,071,600 $ 11,740,700
=============== ===============
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIENCY)
Current Liabilities:
Accounts payable $ 3,858,200 $ 5,569,700
Floor plan inventory loans 1,069,800 2,243,100
Accrued expenses and other liabilities 228,700 133,800
Notes payable 3,086,300 71,900
Contingent settlement of Common Stock Warrants 1,200 2,300
Liabilities from discontinued operations 198,300 52,900
--------------- ---------------
Total Current Liabilities 8,442,500 8,073,700
--------------- ---------------
Notes Payable, less current portion -- 3,031,500
--------------- ---------------
Shareholders' Equity (Deficiency):
4% Series A Convertible Preferred Stock;
600 shares designated, issued and outstanding
(liquidation value of $400,000) 238,200 234,100
Common stock, $0.001 par value; 25,000,000
shares authorized; 10,485,062 shares issued
and outstanding 10,500 10,500
Additional paid-in capital 2,036,400 2,036,400
Accumulated deficit (2,656,000) (1,645,500)
--------------- ---------------
Total Shareholders' Equity (Deficiency) (370,900) 635,500
--------------- ---------------
$ 8,071,600 $ 11,740,700
=============== ===============
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements and
footnote 1 regarding subsequent bankruptcy filing.
1
PACIFIC MAGTRON INTERNATIONAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)
Three Months Ended
March 31,
--------------------------------
2005 2004
-------------- --------------
(Unaudited) (Unaudited)
Sales $ 9,369,700 $ 20,300,700
Cost of sales 8,991,300 19,273,400
-------------- --------------
Gross profit 378,400 1,027,300
Selling, general and
administrative expenses 1,094,800 1,279,400
-------------- --------------
Loss from continuing operations before
other income (expense) (716,400) (252,100)
-------------- --------------
Other income (expense):
Interest income 600 500
Interest expense (51,400) (40,400)
Change in fair value of warrants issued 1,100 31,300
Loss on asset impairment (112,400) --
Other expense, net 27,000 (6,900)
-------------- --------------
Total other expense (135,100) (15,500)
-------------- --------------
Loss from continuing operations (851,500) (267,600)
Loss from discontinued operations of
Pacific Magtron (GA), Inc. (154,900) (42,000)
Accretion of deemed
dividend related to Series A
Convertible Preferred Stock (4,100) (6,400)
Accretion of redemption value of Series A
Convertible Preferred Stock -- (3,200)
-------------- --------------
Net Loss applicable to
common shareholders $ (1,010,500) $ (319,200)
============== ==============
Basic and diluted loss per share applicable
To shareholders:
Loss from continuing operations $ (0.08) $ (0.03)
Loss from discontinued operations (0.01) --
-------------- --------------
Net loss applicable to common
shareholders $ (0.09) $ (0.03)
============== ==============
Shares used in basic and diluted
per share calculation 10,485,062 10,485,062
============== ==============
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements and
footnote 1 regarding subsequent bankruptcy filing.
2
PACIFIC MAGTRON INTERNATIONAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31,
2005 2004
------------ ------------
(Unaudited) (Unaudited)
CASH FLOWS (USED IN) PROVIDED BY
OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net loss $ (1,010,500) $ (319,200)
Less: Accretion of dividend related to Series
A Convertible Preferred Stock 4,100 6,400
Accretion of redemption value of Series
A Convertible Preferred Stock -- 3,200
Loss from discontinued operation 154,900 42,000
------------ ------------
Net loss from continuing operations (851,500) (267,600)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash
provided by (used in) operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization 60,500 102,400
Loss on asset impairment 112,400 --
Provision for doubtful accounts 24,900 22,000
Change in fair value of warrants (1,100) (31,300)
Changes in operating assets and
liabilities:
Accounts receivable 1,383,600 (338,700)
Other receivables -- 122,400
Inventories 2,145,600 (514,300)
Prepaid expenses and other
assets (12,700) 35,200
Accounts payable (1,711,500) 65,300
Accrued expenses and other liabilities 94,900 275,500
------------ ------------
NET CASH PROVIDED BY (USED IN) CONTINUING
OPERATIONS 1,245,100 (529,100)
NET CASH PROVIDED BY DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS 250,800 46,100
------------ ------------
NET CASH PROVIDED BY (USED IN) OPERATING
ACTIVITIES 1,495,900 (483,000)
------------ ------------
CASH FLOWS (USED IN) PROVIDED BY FINANCING
ACTIVITIES:
Net decrease in floor plan inventory loans (1,173,300) 816,500
Decrease in restricted cash 266,600 77,200
Principal payments on notes payable (17,100) (15,700)
------------ ------------
NET CASH (USED IN) PROVIDED BY FINANCING ACTIVITIES (923,800) 878,000
------------ ------------
NET INCREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS 572,100 395,000
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS:
Beginning of period 543,800 1,491,700
------------ ------------
End of period $ 1,115,900 $ 1,886,700
============ ============
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements and
footnote 1 regarding subsequent bankruptcy filing.
3
PACIFIC MAGTRON INTERNATIONAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
1. VOLUNTARY REORGANIZATION UNDER CHAPTER 11
The consolidated financial statements of Pacific Magtron International Corp.
(the "Company" or "PMIC") include its subsidiaries, Pacific Magtron, Inc. (PMI),
Pacific Magtron (GA) Inc. (PMIGA) and LiveWarehouse, Inc. (LW). PMI and PMIGA's
principal activity consists of the importation and wholesale distribution of
electronics products, computer components, and computer peripheral equipment
throughout the United States. LW distributes certain computer and electronics
products and sells consumer computer products on the internet.
Bankruptcy Proceedings
- ----------------------
On May 11, 2005 (the "Petition Date"), PMIC, PMI, PMIGA and LW filed voluntary
petitions to reorganize their businesses under Chapter 11 of the United States
Bankruptcy Code in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District
of Nevada, (the "Bankruptcy Court"). The Bankruptcy Court is jointly
administering these cases as "In re: Pacific Magtron International Corporation,
Inc., et al., Case No.BK-S-05-14325 LBR."
As required by the Bankruptcy Code, the United States Trustee will soon appoint
an official committee of unsecured creditors (the "Creditors' Committee"). The
Creditors' Committee and its legal representatives will have a right to be heard
on all matters that come before the Bankruptcy Court concerning PMIC's
reorganization. There can be no assurance that the Creditors' Committee will
support PMIC's positions or PMIC's plan of reorganization, and any disagreements
between the Creditors' Committee and PMIC could protract the Chapter 11 process,
hinder its ability to operate during the Chapter 11 process, and delay its
emergence from Chapter 11.
PMIC expects to continue to operate its business as "debtor-in-possession" under
the jurisdiction of the Bankruptcy Court and in accordance with the applicable
provisions of the Bankruptcy Code, the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure and
applicable court orders. In general, as debtor-in-possession, PMIC is authorized
under Chapter 11 to continue to operate as an ongoing business, but may not
engage in transactions outside the ordinary course of business without the prior
approval of the Bankruptcy Court. At hearings held on May 16, 2005, the
Bankruptcy Court granted the Debtors first day interim motions for various
relief designed to stabilize operations and business relationships with
customers, vendors, suppliers, employees and others and entered into orders
granting the Debtors to, among other things: (a) pay pre-petition and
post-petition employee wages, salaries, benefits and other employee obligations;
(b) pay normal and reasonable operating expenses of the Debtors where the sum of
(a) and (b) is not to exceed $100,000 in the aggregate plus $21,000 of
pre-petition employee wages, salaries and other benefits; and (c) enter into the
proposed Interim Management Agreement with General Procurement, Inc. to manage
and operate the business and to provide inventory to PMI on a secured basis, to
fulfill customer orders and generate new sales. The first day interim motions
approved by the Bankruptcy Court expire on June 2, 2005 at which time the
Debtors will attend another hearing before the Bankruptcy Court to seek
extension of these orders and approval of the Joint Venture Agreement.
All vendors will be paid for all goods furnished and services provided after the
Petition Date in the ordinary course of business. However, under Section 362 of
the Bankruptcy Code, actions to collect most of our pre-petition liabilities are
automatically stayed (except that liabilities under leases or subject to a
security interest may require PMIC to make "adequate protection" payments).
Absent an order of the Bankruptcy Court, substantially all pre-petition
liabilities are subject to settlement under a plan of reorganization to be
approved by the Bankruptcy court.
4
Under Section 365 of the Bankruptcy Code, PMIC may assume, assume and assign, or
reject certain executory contracts and unexpired leases, including leases of
real property, subject to the approval of the Bankruptcy Court and certain other
conditions. PMIC's Section 365 rights expire on the earlier of the date of
termination of PMIC's exclusive period to file a plan of reorganization
(currently, September 8, 2005) or the date of the conclusion of a disclosure
statement hearing in connection with a proposed plan of reorganization.
In general, if PMIC rejects an executory contract, or unexpired lease, it is
treated as a pre-petition breach of the lease or contract in question and,
subject to certain exceptions, relieves PMIC's of performing any future
obligations but entitles the lessor or contract counterparty to a pre-petition
general unsecured claim for damages caused by such deemed breach and
accordingly, the counterparty may file a claim against PMIC for such damages. As
a result, liabilities subject to compromise may increase in the future, as a
result of damage claims created by PMIC's rejection of various, executory
contracts and unexpired leases. Generally, if PMIC assumes an agreement,
executory contract or unexpired lease it is required to cure most existing
defaults under such contract or lease.
To successfully exit Chapter 11, PMIC must obtain confirmation by the Bankruptcy
Court of a plan of reorganization. A plan of reorganization would, among other
things, resolve PMIC's pre-petition obligations and other liabilities subject to
compromise and establish PMIC's corporate governance subsequent to exit from
bankruptcy. The plan of reorganization would also address the terms and
conditions of exit financing, if any. The rights and claims of various creditors
and security holders will also be determined by the plan. At this time, it is
not possible to predict accurately the effect of the Chapter 11 reorganization
process on PMIC's business, nor can PMIC make any predictions concerning how
certain claims will be valued in it's bankruptcy case.
PMIC is currently operating under an "exclusive period" which expires September
8, 2005, during which PMIC is the only party permitted to file a plan of
reorganization. The decision as to when PMIC will file a plan of reorganization
depends on the timing and outcome of numerous ongoing matters in the Chapter 11
process. PMIC expects to file a plan of reorganization that provides for PMIC's
emergence from bankruptcy, but there can be no assurance that the Bankruptcy
Court will confirm a plan of reorganization or that any such plan will be
implemented successfully.
Proposed Joint Venture
- ----------------------
In connection with PMIC's Chapter 11 case, PMIC is negotiating a proposed
binding agreement to enter into a joint venture with a company in a similar line
of business, to allow PMIC to carry on its business, subject to approval by the
Bankruptcy Court ("JV"). The proposed JV, if agreed upon with the other party
and approved by the Bankruptcy Court, will assume PMIC's customer list,
trademarks, goodwill and other intangible assets, and will continue the
historical business of PMIC. PMIC will also contribute certain employees,
temporary use of its offices and warehouse in Milpitas, CA, and related
utilities, etc. Among other things, the JV partner will manage the day-to-day
operations of the business and use its supplier and other credit lines to
provide for product flow and inventory. The proposed JV will entitle PMIC to
receive 50% of the profits of the JV for a period of 24 months following its
5
effectiveness. For all other purposes, PMIC will be a minority shareholder in
the proposed JV. PMIC's interest in the JV would terminate at the end of the 24
month period. The JV will also use reasonable efforts to sell PMIC's remaining
inventory and collect its outstanding receivables. Revenue from these activities
will belong to PMIC. Profits generated by the proposed JV and distributed to
PMIC will first be used to repay the creditors of PMI and PMIC. In addition, the
operating agreement for the JV will contain a two-year non-compete provision to
ensure that the neither the JV partner nor any person or affiliate of the JV
partner will engage in any competitive activities involving the customers of PMI
and its employees.
Proposed Interim Management Agreement
- -------------------------------------
Simultaneously with the negotiation of the proposed JV, PMIC has been
negotiating a proposed interim management agreement with the JV partner
("Interim Agreement"). The Interim Agreement will provide for the payment of a
management fee to the JV partner in return for managing the business for the 60
day period of time that PMIC expects the Bankruptcy Court will need to approve
the proposed JV. The management fee will be equal to 10% of the gross margin
resulting from sales made by PMIC with inventory supplied by the JV partner. The
Interim Agreement will be post-petition, and provides security to the JV partner
for any inventory provided by it during the operating period. In addition, the
operating agreement contains a two-year non-compete provision to ensure that the
neither the JV partner nor any person or affiliate of the JV partner will engage
in any competitive activities involving the customers of PMI and its employees.
There can be no assurance that PMIC will enter into the proposed Interim
Agreement or proposed JV, that the Bankruptcy Court will approve the proposed
Interim Agreement or the proposed JV, nor can there be any assurance that future
profits from the JV will be sufficient to repay, in full or part, the creditors
of PMI, PMIC, PMIGA and LW.
Financial Statement Presentation
- --------------------------------
As of March 31, 2005, the accompanying financial statements have been prepared
on the historical basis of accounting. Going forward, the Company will prepare
its consolidated financial statements in accordance with American Institute of
Certified Public Accountants' Statement of Position 90-7 ("SOP 90-7"),
"Financial Reporting by Entities in Reorganization Under the Bankruptcy Code,"
and on a going-concern basis, which assumes continuity of operations,
realization of assets and satisfaction of liabilities in the ordinary course of
business.
SOP 90-7 requires that the financial statements separate transactions and events
that are directly associated with the restructuring from the ongoing operations
of the business. Accordingly, all transactions (including, but not limited to,
all professional fees, realized gains and losses, and provisions for losses)
directly related to the reorganization and restructuring of the business are
reported separately in the financial statements. The Statements of Consolidated
Financial Position distinguishes pre-petition liabilities subject to compromise
both from those that are not subject to compromise as well as from all
post-petition liabilities. Liabilities subject to compromise are reported at the
amounts expected to be allowed by the Bankruptcy Court, even if they may be
settled for lesser amounts. At March 31, 2005 all recorded liabilities not paid
by May 11, 2005 will be pre-petition liabilities. Pre-petition liabilities from
March 31, 2005 total $8,442,500. There were no directly associated costs related
to the bankruptcy proceeding incurred by March 31, 2005.
6
In addition, as a result of PMIC's Chapter 11 case, the realization of assets
and the satisfaction of liabilities (without substantial adjustments and/or
changes in ownership) are subject to uncertainty. While operating as
debtors-in-possession under the protection of Chapter 11 and subject to approval
of the Bankruptcy Court, or otherwise as permitted in the ordinary course of
business, we may sell or dispose of assets and liquidate or settle liabilities
for some amounts other than those reflected in the consolidated financial
statements. Further, our plan of reorganization could materially change the
amounts and classifications in the historical consolidated financial statements.
Pursuant to the Bankruptcy Code, we will file schedules with the Bankruptcy
Court identifying our assets and liabilities as of the Petition Date, while our
creditors will now be able to file proofs of claim with the Bankruptcy Court.
The total amount of claims to be filed with the Bankruptcy Court may vary from
our own. Any differences in amount between claims filed by creditors and
liabilities shown in our records will be investigated and resolved in connection
with our claims resolution process. That process has not commenced and will take
time to complete. For this reason, the ultimate number and allowed amounts of
such claims cannot yet be determined.
2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
In December 2004, certain stockholders (the "Stockholders") holding a collective
majority interest in the Company entered into a Stock Purchase Agreement with
Advanced Communications Technologies, Inc., a Florida corporation ("ACT"),
pursuant to which ACT agreed to purchase from the Stockholders, and the
Stockholders agreed to sell to ACT, an aggregate of 6,454,300 shares of the
common stock of the Company (the "PMIC Shares") for the aggregate purchase price
of $500,000. On December 30, 2004, the Stockholders and ACT closed on the sale
of the PMIC Shares (the "Closing"). The PMIC Shares represent 61.56% of the
currently issued and outstanding common stock of the Company.
The Company incurred a net loss applicable to common shareholders of $1,010,500
for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and $319,200 for the three months
ended March 31, 2004. As of March 31, 2005, the Company also had a working
capital deficiency of $4,387,100, including the classification of notes payable
in default as a current liability, and an accumulated deficit of $2,656,000 and
a shareholders' deficiency of $370,900. As of March 31, 2005, the Company was in
violation of certain of its debt covenants with Textron Financial Corporation
(Textron) and Wells Fargo Bank (Wells Fargo). The Company's inventory flooring
line with Textron can be terminated and loan payments on its inventory flooring
line with Textron and mortgage loan with Wells Fargo can be accelerated. The
Company relies on credit terms from its suppliers to fund inventory purchases.
Certain vendors have progressively imposed more restrictive credit terms, such
that, beginning in March 2005, the Company has been unable to fund purchases.
Currently, the Company's business is limited to selling its existing inventory
with no ability to obtain credit to replenish or purchase other items our
customers may need. As of March 31, 2005, the Company had $343,300 of
inventories compared to $2,488,900 at December 31, 2004. The Company does not
have the ability to fund the shortfall caused by the elimination of terms by
vendors. The number of Company staff decreased to 24 employees on April 30, 2005
from 58 employees on December 31, 2004. Because of the reduced sales caused by
the lack of new inventory, the Company has not been able to pay its obligations
on a timely basis. The Company has been sued by one supplier for approximately
$680,000 in unpaid invoices and by another for approximately $80,000 which are
7
included in accounts payable at March 31, 2005. Other creditors have threatened
suit. On May 11, 2005, the Company filed voluntary petitions to reorganize the
business under Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code in the United
States Bankruptcy Court. These conditions raise substantial doubt about the
Company's ability to continue as a going concern. The accompanying condensed
consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might
result from the outcome of this uncertainty.
The financial information included herein is unaudited. The interim consolidated
financial statements have been prepared on the same basis as the annual
financial statements and, in the opinion of management, reflect all adjustments,
which include only normal recurring adjustments, necessary for a fair
presentation of the Company's consolidated financial position and results of
operations for the periods presented. Certain information and footnote
disclosures normally included in the financial statements prepared in accordance
with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America
have been omitted. These consolidated financial statements should be read in
conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and accompanying
notes presented in the Company's Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004.
Interim operating results are not necessarily indicative of operating results
expected for the entire year.
The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements include the
accounts of PMIC and its wholly-owned subsidiaries, PMI, PMIGA, and LW.
Inter-company accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
PMIGA ceased its operation as of April 30, 2005. The activities, assets and
liabilities of PMIGA were reclassified for reporting purposes as discontinued
operations for all periods shown in the accompanying condensed consolidated
financial statements.
STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION
The Company applies the intrinsic-value-based method of accounting prescribed by
Accounting Principles Board (APB) Opinion No. 25, "Accounting for Stock Issued
to Employees," and related interpretations including FASB Interpretation No. 44,
"Accounting for Certain Transactions involving Stock Compensation," an
interpretation of APB Opinion No. 25, to account for its fixed-plan stock
options. Under this method, compensation expense is recorded on the date of
grant only if the current market price of the underlying stock exceeded the
exercise price. FASB Statement No. 123, "Accounting for Stock-Based
Compensation," FASB Statement No. 148, "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation
- - Transition and Disclosure" and FASB Statement No. 123R, "Amendments of FASB
Statement No. 123," established accounting and disclosure requirements using a
fair-value-based method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation
plans. The requirements of FASB Statement No 123, as amended, are effective for
fiscal periods beginning after June 15, 2005.
The following table illustrates the effect on net loss if the fair-value-based
method had been applied to all outstanding and unvested awards in each period.
The Company estimates the fair value and stock options at the grant date by
using the Black-Scholes option pricing model.
There were no options granted for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and
2004. During the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, no options were
exercised and options to purchase 2,000 shares of the Company's common stock in
2004 were cancelled due to employee terminations. There were no options
cancelled or forfeited during the three months ended March 31, 2005.
8
Had the Company adopted the fair value method of accounting for stock options
provided by FASB Statement No. 123, the Company's net loss would have increased
as follows:
Three Months Ended
March 31,
--------------------------------
2005 2004
----------- -----------
Net loss applicable to common
shareholders:
As reported $(1,010,500) $ (319,200)
Add: total stock based employee
compensation expense determined
using the fair value method
for all awards -- (4,200)
----------- -----------
Pro forma $(1.010,500) $ (323,400)
----------- -----------
Basic and diluted loss per share:
As reported $ (0.09) $ (0.03)
Pro forma $ (0.09) $ (0.03)
PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT AND OTHER LONG-LIVED ASSETS
Property and equipment are stated at cost. Depreciation is provided using the
straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets, as follows:
Building and improvements 39 years
Furniture and fixtures 5 to 7 years
Computers and equipment 3 to 5 years
Automobiles 5 years
Software 3 years
The Company periodically reviews its long-lived assets for impairment. When
events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset
may not be recoverable, the Company adjusts the asset to its estimated fair
value. The fair value of an asset is determined by the Company as the amount at
which that asset could be bought or sold in a current transaction between
willing parties or the present value of the estimated future cash flows from the
asset. The asset value recoverability test is performed by the Company on an
on-going basis. During the quarter ended March 31, 2005, the Company recorded an
impairment loss of $112,400. The write-down of the property and equipment was
based on projected future utilization of the property and equipment.
LOSS PER SHARE
Basic loss per share is computed by dividing loss applicable to common
stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the
period. Diluted earnings per share reflect the potential dilution of securities,
using the treasury stock method, that could share in the earnings of an entity.
During the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, options and warrants to
purchase shares of the Company's common stock and shares of common stock
issuable upon conversion of Series A Preferred Stock were excluded from the
calculation of diluted loss per share as their effect would be anti-dilutive.
The following is the computation of the Company's basic and diluted loss per
share:
9
Three Months Ended
March 31,
------------------------------
2005 2004
------------ ------------
Loss from continuing operations $ (851,500) $ (267,600)
Accretion of deemed dividend related to
Series A Convertible Preferred Stock (4,100) (6,400)
Accretion of redemption value of
Series A Convertible Preferred Stock -- (3,200)
------------ ------------
Loss from continuing operations
applicable to common shareholders $ (855,600) $ (277,200)
============ ============
Basic and diluted loss per share -
Loss from continuing operations $ (0.08) $ (0.03)
============ ============
Shares used in basic and diluted
per share calculation 10,485,062 10,485,062
============ ============
3. DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS
On April 30, 2005, the Company ceased its operations in PMIGA. The operating
results of PMIGA for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004 were as
follows: Three Months Ended
March 31,
----------------------------------
2005 2004
----------- -----------
Net sales $ 988,900 $ 1,664,200
Net loss $ (154,900) $ (42,000)
4. STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
Cash was paid during the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004 for:
2005 2004
--------- ---------
State income taxes $ 3,500 --
========= =========
Interest $ 51,400 $ 40,400
========= =========
The following are the non-cash financing activities for the three months ended
March 31, 2005 and 2004:
2005 2004
--------- --------
Accretion of preferred stock dividend $ 4,100 $ 6,400
========= ========
Accretion of redemption value of
Series A Redeemable Convertible
Preferred Stock -- $ 3,200
========= ========
10
On June 30, 2003, the Company entered into an agreement to sell certain assets
of Lea. In addition to $5,000 in cash consideration, the Company received an
electronic commerce support service contract from the purchaser for two years
valued at $48,000. The service contract is being amortized using a straight-line
method over the term of the contract.
5. FLOOR PLAN INVENTORY LOANS AND LETTER OF CREDIT
In May 2003, PMI obtained a $3,500,000 inventory financing facility, which
includes a $1 million letter of credit facility used as security for inventory
purchased on terms from vendors in Taiwan, from Textron. The credit facility is
guaranteed by PMIC, PMIGA, LW, two shareholders/officers of the Company, FNC and
Lea, and may be discontinued by Textron at any time at its sole discretion.
Borrowings under the inventory line are subject to 30 days repayment, at which
time interest accrues at the prime rate plus 6% (11.75% at March 31, 2005). The
Company is required to maintain collateral coverage equal to 120% of the
outstanding balance. A prepayment is required when the outstanding balance
exceeds the sum of 70% of the Company's eligible accounts receivable, and 90% of
the Textron-financed inventory and 100% of any cash assigned or pledged to
Textron. The Company was also required to maintain $250,000 in a restricted
account as a pledge to Textron. This amount was reflected as restricted cash as
of December 31, 2004 in the accompanying condensed consolidated financial
statements. During March 2005, Textron applied the $250,000 restricted cash
against the amounts owed Textron. As of March 31, 2005, there was no amount in
the restricted account. PMI and PMIC are required to meet certain financial
ratio covenants, including a minimum current ratio, a maximum leverage ratio, a
minimum tangible capital fund and required levels of profitability. As of March
31, 2005, the Company was out of compliance with those covenants and a waiver
has not been obtained from Textron. This gives Textron the option to terminate
the credit facility and accelerate the loan payments. Upon termination, the
Company would have no other facility to finance its inventory purchases. As of
May 20, 2005, Textron has not terminated this agreement.
As of March 31, 2005, the outstanding balance of this loan was $1,069,800 and is
classified as a current liability on the accompanying condensed consolidated
balance sheet.
6. NOTES PAYABLE
The Company's wholly owned subsidiary, PMI, obtained financing of $3,498,000 for
the purchase of its office and warehouse facility. Of the amount financed,
$2,500,000 was in the form of a 10-year bank loan utilizing a 30-year
amortization period. This loan bears interest at the bank's 90-day LIBOR rate
(2.75% as of March 31, 2005) plus 2.5%, and is secured by a deed of trust on the
property. The balance of the financing was obtained through a $998,000 Small
Business Administration ("SBA") loan due in monthly installments through April
2017. The SBA loan bears interest at 7.569%, and is secured by the underlying
property.
Under the bank loan, PMI is required, among other things, to maintain a minimum
debt service coverage, a maximum debt to tangible net worth ratio, and to have
no more than two consecutive quarterly losses. In addition, PMI is required to
achieve a net income on an annual basis. PMI was in violation of the annual
income covenants and the minimum EBITA coverage ratio as of December 31, 2004.
These covenant violations constituted an event of default under the loan
agreement and gave the bank the right to call the loan. A waiver of the loan
covenant violations was obtained from the bank through December 31, 2005. As a
condition for the waiver, the Company maintains a restricted account as a
reserve for the debt service. As of March 31, 2005, the balance of the
restricted account was $238,400 which is included in Restricted Cash in
non-current assets in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet.
11
The Company has not received a waiver of the loan covenant violations beyond
December 31, 2005. On May 10, 2005, the Company filed voluntary petitions to
reorganize the business under Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code in
the United States Bankruptcy Court. Consequently, the Company is required to
classify the Wells Fargo bank loan and the SBA loan as a current liability in
the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet as of March 31, 2005.
7. SEGMENT INFORMATION
The Company has two reportable segments: PMI and LW.
PMI imports and distributes electronic products, computer components, and
computer peripheral equipment to various distributors and retailers throughout
the United States. LW sells similar products to end-users and resellers through
a website. PMIGA ceased its business as of April 30, 2005. The activities of
PMIGA for all periods were reclassified for reporting purposes as discontinued
operations.
The accounting policies of the segments are the same as those described in the
summary of significant accounting policies presented in the Company's Form 10-K.
The Company evaluates performance based on income or loss before income taxes,
not including nonrecurring gains or losses. Inter-segment transfers between
reportable segments have been insignificant. The Company's reportable segments
are separate strategic business units. They are managed separately because each
business requires different technology and/or marketing strategies. Sales to
foreign countries were approximately $1,800,000 for the three months ended March
31, 2005 and were insignificant for the three months ended March 31, 2004.
The following table presents information about reported continuing segment
profit or loss for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004:
2005 2004
------------ ------------
Revenues from external
customers:
PMI $ 9,322,000 $ 18,164,700
LW 47,700 2,136,000
------------ ------------
Total $ 9,369,700 $ 20,300,700
============ ============
Segment loss before
income taxes:
PMI $ (759,600) $ (263,800)
LW (91,000) (27,100)
------------ ------------
Loss before income
taxes for reportable segments (850,600) (290,900)
Change in fair value of
warrants issued 1,100 31,300
Amortization of warrant
issuance costs (2,000) (8,000)
------------ ------------
Consolidated loss from
continuing operations $ (851,500) $ (267,600)
============ ============
12
8. ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE AGREEMENTS
On April 1, 2003, the Company purchased a credit insurance policy from American
Credit Indemnity covering certain accounts receivable up to $2,000,000 of
losses. This policy expired on March 31, 2005. The Company also entered into an
insurance agreement with ENX, Inc. ("ENX") for its accounts receivable. The ENX
agreement also expired on March 31, 2005. Under this agreement, the Company sold
its past-due accounts receivable from pre-approved customers with pre-approved
credit limits under certain conditions. The commission was 0.5% of the approved
invoice amounts with a minimum annual commission of $50,000. These accounts
receivable agreements were not renewed after their expiration dates and no other
agreements were entered into after March 31, 2005.
9. CAPITAL STOCK
In April 2003, Nasdaq notified the Company that its common stock was delisted
from the Nasdaq SmallCap Market, effective April 30, 2003. The Company's common
stock is being traded on the Over the Counter Bulletin Board ("OCTBB"). The
delisting of the Company's common stock enabled the holder of the Company's
Series A Preferred Stock to request the repurchase of such shares. The Company
had increased the carrying value of the Series A Preferred Stock to its
redemption value and had recorded an increase in loss applicable to common
shareholders for the three months ended March 31, 2004 in the accompanying
consolidated statement of operations. The Company included its Series A
Preferred Stock in current liabilities as of March 31, 2004.
In December 2004, the Company entered into an agreement (the Series A Agreement)
with the Investor for restructuring certain terms of the Series A Preferred
Stock. In connection with the closing of the transactions under the Series A
Agreement, the Company amended and restated its Certificate of Designation of
Preferences, Rights and Limitations of the Series A Preferred Stock on December
31, 2004. Among the terms amended are (1) the number of shares designated as
Series A Preferred Stock were decreased from 1,000 to 600 shares; (2) the Stated
Value of each share of Series A Preferred Stock was reduced from $1,000 to
$666.67; (3) the holders of the Series A Preferred Stock no longer have the
right to require the Company to redeem each share of Series A Preferred Stock,
which rights were triggered upon the occurrence of certain events; (4) the
redemption amount payable by the Company upon exercise of its redemption right
was reduced from 150% of Stated Value to 100% of Stated Value; (5) there is a
181-day waiting period from the date of filing the Amended and Restated
Certificate of Designation before the holder may exercise conversion (unless the
Company initiates a redemption prior to the end of the 181-day period); (6) the
conversion price of the Series A Preferred Stock was changed to a fixed price of
$0.50 per share, subject to customary and anti-dilution adjustments; and (7) the
Company has five trading days, instead of three, to comply with conversion
procedures. As part of the Series A Agreement, the Investor forfeited a stock
purchase warrant, exercisable for 300,000 shares of the Company's common stock
that was issued in connection with the original issuance of the Company's Series
A Preferred Stock. The Company accounted for these transactions in accordance
with SFAS 15, "Accounting by Debtors and Creditors for Troubled Debt
Restructurings." As of March 31, 2005, the carrying amount of the Series A
Preferred Stock was classified as shareholders' equity in the balance sheet.
10. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
In December 2004, two stockholders/executives (the "Stockholders") holding a
collective majority interest in the Company entered into a Stock Purchase
Agreement with Advanced Communications Technologies, Inc., a Florida corporation
("ACT"), pursuant to which ACT agreed to purchase from the Stockholders, and the
Stockholders agreed to sell to ACT, an aggregate of 6,454,300 shares of the
13
common stock of the Company (the "PMIC Shares") for the aggregate purchase price
of $500,000. On December 30, 2004, the Stockholders and ACT closed on the sale
of the PMIC Shares (the "Closing"). In connection with the sale, the
Stockholders entered into employment agreements with the Company and ACT. The
Employment Agreements, dated December 30, 2004 provide for a cash bonus of
$225,000 each to be paid within 30 days of the Closing and other bonus and
earn-out provisions that may be paid in cash or in shares of common stock of
ACT. Under the earn-out provisions, the Stockholders may earn the right to
receive in aggregate up to 99,999,999 shares of ACT's common stock. In the event
the Company terminates the Employment Agreements without cause upon 30 days
prior written notice, the Stockholders are entitled to 6 months severance pay.
On May 10, 2005, the Company terminated the Employment Agreements for "cause"
pursuant to the terms of the Employment Agreements. No part of the bonuses have
been paid. On May 11, 2005, ACT filed a complaint in the United States District
Court for the Southern District of New York against the former officers and
principal shareholders of PMIC, for the recovery of damages and costs for
securities fraud, breach of contract and other counts in connection with the
Stock Purchase Agreement.
14
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS
OF OPERATIONS
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
The accompanying discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results
of operations is based on the condensed consolidated financial statements, which
are included elsewhere in this quarterly report. The following discussion and
analysis should be read in conjunction with the accompanying financial
statements and related notes thereto. This discussion contains forward-looking
statements within the meaning of Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended. Our actual results could differ materially from those set
forth in the forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements, by their
very nature, include risks and uncertainties. Accordingly, our actual results
could differ materially from those projected in this report. A wide variety of
factors could adversely impact revenues, profitability, cash flows and capital
needs. Such factors, many of which are beyond our control, include, but are not
limited to, those identified in the Company's Form 10-K for the fiscal year
ended December 31, 2004 and included herein under the heading "Cautionary
Factors That May Affect Future Results."
RECENT DEVELOPMENT
Bankruptcy Proceedings
- ----------------------
On May 11, 2005 (the "Petition Date"), PMIC, PMI, PMIGA and LW filed voluntary
petitions to reorganize their businesses under Chapter 11 of the United States
Bankruptcy Code in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District
of Nevada, (the "Bankruptcy Court"). The Bankruptcy Court is jointly
administering these cases as "In re: Pacific Magtron International Corporation,
Inc., et al., Case No.BK-S-05-14325 LBR."
As required by the Bankruptcy Code, the United States Trustee will soon appoint
an official committee of unsecured creditors (the "Creditors' Committee"). The
Creditors' Committee and its legal representatives will have a right to be heard
on all matters that come before the Bankruptcy Court concerning PMIC's
reorganization. There can be no assurance that the Creditors' Committee will
support PMIC's positions or PMIC's plan of reorganization, and any disagreements
between the Creditors' Committee and PMIC could protract the Chapter 11 process,
hinder its ability to operate during the Chapter 11 process, and delay its
emergence from Chapter 11.
PMIC expects to continue to operate its business as "debtor-in-possession" under
the jurisdiction of the Bankruptcy Court and in accordance with the applicable
provisions of the Bankruptcy Code, the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure and
applicable court orders. In general, as debtor-in-possession, PMIC is authorized
under Chapter 11 to continue to operate as an ongoing business, but may not
engage in transactions outside the ordinary course of business without the prior
approval of the Bankruptcy Court. At hearings held on May 16, 2005, the
Bankruptcy Court granted the Debtors first day interim motions for various
relief designed to stabilize operations and business relationships with
customers, vendors, suppliers, employees and others and entered into orders
granting the Debtors to, among other things: (a) pay pre-petition and
post-petition employee wages, salaries, benefits and other employee obligations;
(b) pay normal and reasonable operating expenses of the Debtors where the sum of
(a) and (b) is not to exceed $100,000 in the aggregate plus $21,000 of
pre-petition employee wages, salaries and other benefits; and (c) enter into the
proposed Interim Management Agreement with General Procurement, Inc. to manage
and operate the business and to provide inventory to PMI on a secured basis, to
fulfill customer orders and generate new sales. The first day interim motions
approved by the Bankruptcy Court expire on June 2, 2005 at which time the
Debtors will attend another hearing before the Bankruptcy Court to seek
extension of these orders and approval of the Joint Venture Agreement.
15
All vendors will be paid for all goods furnished and services provided after the
Petition Date in the ordinary course of business. However, under Section 362 of
the Bankruptcy Code, actions to collect most of our pre-petition liabilities are
automatically stayed (except that liabilities under leases or subject to a
security interest may require PMIC to make "adequate protection" payments).
Absent an order of the Bankruptcy Court, substantially all pre-petition
liabilities are subject to settlement under a plan of reorganization to be
approved by the Bankruptcy court.
Under Section 365 of the Bankruptcy Code, PMIC may assume, assume and assign, or
reject certain executory contracts and unexpired leases, including leases of
real property, subject to the approval of the Bankruptcy Court and certain other
conditions. PMIC's Section 365 rights expire on the earlier of the date of
termination of PMIC's exclusive period to file a plan of reorganization
(currently, September 8, 2005) or the date of the conclusion of a disclosure
statement hearing in connection with a proposed plan of reorganization.
In general, if PMIC rejects an executory contract, or unexpired lease, it is
treated as a pre-petition breach of the lease or contract in question and,
subject to certain exceptions, relieves PMIC's of performing any future
obligations but entitles the lessor or contract counterparty to a pre-petition
general unsecured claim for damages caused by such deemed breach and
accordingly, the counterparty may file a claim against PMIC for such damages. As
a result, liabilities subject to compromise may increase in the future, as a
result of damage claims created by PMIC's rejection of various, executory
contracts and unexpired leases. Generally, if PMIC assumes an agreement,
executory contract or unexpired lease it is required to cure most existing
defaults under such contract or lease.
To successfully exit Chapter 11, PMIC must obtain confirmation by the Bankruptcy
Court of a plan of reorganization. A plan of reorganization would, among other
things, resolve PMIC's pre-petition obligations and other liabilities subject to
compromise and establish PMIC's corporate governance subsequent to exit from
bankruptcy. The plan of reorganization would also address the terms and
conditions of exit financing, if any. The rights and claims of various creditors
and security holders will also be determined by the plan. At this time, it is
not possible to predict accurately the effect of the Chapter 11 reorganization
process on PMIC's business, nor can PMIC make any predictions concerning how
certain claims will be valued in it's bankruptcy case.
PMIC is currently operating under an "exclusive period" which expires September
8, 2005, during which PMIC is the only party permitted to file a plan of
reorganization. The decision as to when PMIC will file a plan of reorganization
depends on the timing and outcome of numerous ongoing matters in the Chapter 11
process. PMIC expects to file a plan of reorganization that provides for PMIC's
emergence from bankruptcy, but there can be no assurance that the Bankruptcy
Court will confirm a plan of reorganization or that any such plan will be
implemented successfully.
Proposed Joint Venture
- ----------------------
In connection with PMIC's Chapter 11 case, PMIC is negotiating a proposed
binding agreement to enter into a joint venture with a company in a similar line
of business, to allow PMIC to carry on its business, subject to approval by the
Bankruptcy Court ("JV"). The proposed JV, if agreed upon with the other party
and approved by the Bankruptcy Court, will assume PMIC's customer list,
trademarks, goodwill and other intangible assets, and will continue the
historical business of PMIC. PMIC will also contribute certain employees,
16
temporary use of its offices and warehouse in Milpitas, CA, and related
utilities, etc. Among other things, the JV partner will manage the day-to-day
operations of the business and use its supplier and other credit lines to
provide for product flow and inventory. The proposed JV will entitle PMIC to
receive 50% of the profits of the JV for a period of 24 months following its
effectiveness. For all other purposes, PMIC will be a minority shareholder in
the proposed JV. PMIC's interest in the JV would terminate at the end of the 24
month period. The JV will also use reasonable efforts to sell PMIC's remaining
inventory and collect its outstanding receivables. Revenue from these activities
will belong to PMIC. Profits generated by the proposed JV and distributed to
PMIC will first be used to repay the creditors of PMI and PMIC. In addition, the
operating agreement for the JV will contain a two-year non-compete provision to
ensure that the neither the JV partner nor any person or affiliate of the JV
partner will engage in any competitive activities involving the customers of PMI
and its employees.
Proposed Interim Management Agreement
- -------------------------------------
Simultaneously with the negotiation of the proposed JV, PMIC has been
negotiating a proposed interim management agreement with the JV partner
("Interim Agreement"). The Interim Agreement will provide for the payment of a
management fee to the JV partner in return for managing the business for the 60
day period of time that PMIC expects the Bankruptcy Court will need to approve
the proposed JV. The management fee will be equal to 10% of the gross margin
resulting from sales made by PMIC with inventory supplied by the JV partner. The
Interim Agreement will be post-petition, and provides security to the JV partner
for any inventory provided by it during the operating period. In addition, the
operating agreement contains a two-year non-compete provision to ensure that the
neither the JV partner nor any person or affiliate of the JV partner will engage
in any competitive activities involving the customers of PMI and its employees.
There can be no assurance that PMIC will enter into the proposed Interim
Agreement or proposed JV, that the Bankruptcy Court will approve the proposed
Interim Agreement or the proposed JV, nor can there be any assurance that future
profits from the JV will be sufficient to repay, in full or part, the creditors
of PMI, PMIC, PMIGA and LW.
Financial Statement Presentation
- --------------------------------
As of March 31, 2005, the accompanying financial statements have been prepared
on the historical basis of accounting. Going forward, the Company will prepare
its accompanying consolidated financial statements in accordance with American
Institute of Certified Public Accountants' Statement of Position 90-7 ("SOP
90-7"), "Financial Reporting by Entities in Reorganization Under the Bankruptcy
Code," and on a going-concern basis, which assumes continuity of operations,
realization of assets and satisfaction of liabilities in the ordinary course of
business.
SOP 90-7 requires that the financial statements separate transactions and events
that are directly associated with the restructuring from the ongoing operations
of the business. Accordingly, all transactions (including, but not limited to,
all professional fees, realized gains and losses, and provisions for losses)
directly related to the reorganization and restructuring of the business are
reported separately in the financial statements. The Statements of Consolidated
Financial Position distinguishes pre-petition liabilities subject to compromise
both from those that are not subject to compromise as well as from all
post-petition liabilities. Liabilities subject to compromise are reported at the
amounts expected to be allowed by the Bankruptcy Court, even if they may be
settled for lesser amounts. At March 31, 2005 all recorded liabilities not paid
by May 11, 2005 will be pre-petition. There were no directly associated costs
related to the bankruptcy proceeding incurred by March 31, 2005.
17
In addition, as a result of PMIC's Chapter 11 case, the realization of assets
and the satisfaction of liabilities (without substantial adjustments and/or
changes in ownership) are subject to uncertainty. While operating as
debtors-in-possession under the protection of Chapter 11 and subject to approval
of the Bankruptcy Court, or otherwise as permitted in the ordinary course of
business, we may sell or dispose of assets and liquidate or settle liabilities
for some amounts other than those reflected in the consolidated financial
statements. Further, our plan of reorganization could materially change the
amounts and classifications in the historical consolidated financial statements.
Pursuant to the Bankruptcy Code, we will file schedules with the Bankruptcy
Court identifying our assets and liabilities as of the Petition Date, while our
creditors will now be able to file proofs of claim with the Bankruptcy Court.
The total amount of claims to be filed with the Bankruptcy Court may vary from
our own. Any differences in amount between claims filed by creditors and
liabilities shown in our records will be investigated and resolved in connection
with our claims resolution process. That process has not commenced and will take
time to complete. For this reason, the ultimate number and allowed amounts of
such claims cannot yet be determined.
LINES OF BUSINESS
As used herein and unless otherwise indicated, the terms "Company," "we," and
"our" refer to Pacific Magtron International Corp. and each of our subsidiaries.
We provide solutions to customers in several segments of the computer industry.
Our business is organized into two divisions: PMI and LW. PMI, a subsidiary,
provides for the wholesale distribution of computer multimedia and storage
peripheral products and provide value-added packaged solutions to a wide range
of resellers, vendors, OEMs and systems integrators. LW, a subsidiary, provides
consumers a convenient way to purchase computer products via the internet. LW
also distributes certain computer related products to resellers. As part of the
overall strategy of re-focusing our core business in wholesale distribution, the
resources allocated to the LW business segment were reduced beginning in the
third quarter of 2004. As of April 30, 2005, PMIGA, a subsidiary, ceased its
operations. PMIGA distributed PMI's products in the southeastern United States
market. The activities of PMIGA for all periods have been reclassified for
reporting purposes as discontinued operations.
OVERVIEW
The Company relies on credit terms from its suppliers to fund inventory
purchases. Vendors have progressively imposed more restrictive credit terms,
such that, beginning in March 2005, the Company has been unable to fund
purchases. Currently, the Company's business is limited to selling existing
inventory with no ability to obtain credit to replenish or purchase other items
our customers may need. As of March 31, 2005, inventories were approximately
$343,300, compared to $2,488,900 at December 31, 2004. The Company does not have
the ability to fund the inventory purchases caused by the elimination of terms
by vendors. The number of staff decreased from 58 employees on December 31, 2004
18
to 44 employees on March 31, 2005 and 24 employees on April 30, 2005. Our
consolidated sales were $9,369,700 for the quarter ended March 31, 2005 as
compared to $20,300,700 for the quarter ended March 31, 2004. We also had a
consolidated net loss of $1,010,500 for the three months ended March 31, 2005 as
compared to $319,200 for the same period in 2004. We closed our operations in
PMIGA as of April 30, 2005 and reported a loss of $154,900 for the three months
ended March 31, 2005 as discontinued operations for reporting purposes. Because
of the reduced sales caused by the lack of new inventory, the Company has not
been able to pay its obligations on a timely basis.
As of March 31, 2005, we had cash and cash equivalents of $1,115,900 and a
working capital deficiency of $4,387,100 and a shareholders' deficiency of
$370,900. We were in violation of certain loan covenants under our inventory
financing facility with Textron as of March 31, 2005 and a waiver for the
violation has not been obtained. This gives Textron the option to terminate the
credit facility and accelerate the loan payments. If Textron exercised its
option to terminate the credit facility, it is uncertain that the Company would
be able to obtain alternative financing.
During 2004, the Company was in violation of certain covenants under our real
estate mortgage loan agreement with Wells Fargo. A waiver of the default was
obtained from Wells Fargo through December 31, 2005. As a condition for the
waiver, the Company transferred $250,000 to a restricted account as a reserve
for the debt service. As of March 31, 2005, a reserve of $238,400 remained in
the restricted account, which is included in Restricted Cash in non-current
assets in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet. The Company has
not received a waiver of the loan covenant violations beyond December 31, 2005.
Consequently, the Company is required to classify the bank loan as a current
liability in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet as of March
31, 2005.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Our significant accounting policies are described in Note 1 to the consolidated
financial statements included as Part II Item 8 to the Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2004. The following are our critical accounting
policies:
REVENUE RECOGNITION
The Company recognizes sales of computer and related products upon delivery of
goods to the customer (generally upon shipment) and the customer takes ownership
and assumes risk of loss, provided no significant obligations remain and
collectibility is probable. A provision for estimated product returns is
established at the time of sale based upon historical return rates, which have
typically been insignificant, adjusted for current economic conditions. The
Company generally does not provide volume discounts or rebates to its resale
customers.
LONG-LIVED ASSETS
The Company periodically reviews its long-lived assets for impairment. When
events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset
group may not be recoverable, the Company adjusts the asset group to its
estimated fair value. The fair value of an asset group is determined by the
Company as the amount at which that asset group could be bought or sold in a
current transaction between willing parties or the present value of the
estimated future cash flows from the asset. The asset value recoverability test
is performed by the Company on an on-going basis.
19
During the quarter ended March 31, 2005, the Company recorded an impairment loss
of $112,400. The write-down of the property and equipment was based on projected
future utilization of those property and equipment.
ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE AND ALLOWANCE FOR DOUBTFUL ACCOUNTS
The Company grants credit to its customers only after undertaking an
investigation of credit risk for all significant amounts. An allowance for
doubtful accounts is provided for estimated credit losses at a level deemed
appropriate to adequately provide for known and inherent risks related to such
amounts. The allowance is based on reviews of loss, adjustment history, current
economic conditions, level of credit insurance and other factors that deserve
recognition in estimating potential losses. Generally, our allowance for
doubtful accounts includes receivables past due over 90 days, returned checks
and an estimated percentage of the receivables currently due. While management
uses the best information available in making its determination, the ultimate
recovery of recorded accounts receivable is also dependent upon future economic
and other conditions that may be beyond management's control. Our credit
insurance policies expired on March 31, 2005 and have not been renewed. We are
unable to project the future trend of our bad debt expense.
INVENTORY VALUATION
Our inventories, consisting primarily of finished goods, are stated at the lower
of cost (moving weighted average method) or market. We regularly review
inventory turnover and quantities on hand for excess, slow moving and obsolete
inventory based primarily on our estimated forecast of product demand. Excess,
obsolete and slow-moving inventory items, including items that have no purchase
and sales activities for more than one year, are written down to their net
realizable values. Due to a relatively high inventory turnover rate and the
inclusion of provisions in the vendor agreements common to industry practice
that provide us price protection or credits for declines in inventory value and
the right to return certain unsold inventory, we believe that our risk for a
decrease in inventory value is minimized. No assurance can be given, however,
that we can continue to turn over our inventory as quickly in the future or that
we can negotiate such provisions in each of our vendor contracts or that such
industry practice will continue.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, certain selected
financial data of the continuing operations as a percentage of sales:
Three Months Ended
March 31,
-----------------------
2005 2004
--------- ---------
Sales 100.0% 100.0%
Cost of sales 96.0 94.9
--------- ---------
Gross profit 4.0 5.1
Operating expenses 11.7 6.4
--------- ---------
Loss from operations (7.7) (1.3)
Other expense, net (1.4) (0.1)
--------- ---------
Loss from continuing operations (9.1) (1.4)
Loss from discontinued operations (1.7) (0.2)
Accretion and deemed dividend
relating to Series A Convertible
and Redeemable Preferred Stock (0.0) (0.0)
--------- ---------
Net loss applicable to Common Shareholders (10.8)% (1.6)%
========= =========
20
SALES
- -----
The Company relies on credit terms from its suppliers to fund inventory
purchases. Certain vendors have progressively imposed more restrictive credit
terms, such that, beginning in March 2005, the Company has been unable to fund
purchases. Currently, the Company's business is limited to selling its existing
inventory with no ability to obtain credit to replenish or purchase other items
our customers may need. Our consolidated sales decreased to $9,369,700 for the
quarter ended March 31, 2005 from $20,300,700 for the quarter ended March 31,
2004. Our consolidated gross profit also decreased to $378,400 for the quarter
ended March 31, 2005 from $1,027,300 for the quarter ended March 31, 2004. Our
sales will continue to decrease if we cannot fund the purchases and replenish
our inventories.
PMI
PMI's sales decreased from $18,164,700 for the quarter ended March 31, 2004 to
$9,322,000 in the same quarter of 2005, a decrease of 48.7%. PMI's gross profit
for the quarter ended March 31, 2005 was $372,700, or 4.0% of sales, compared to
$809,300, or 4.5% of sales, for the same period in 2004. The decrease in gross
profit was the result of not having the similar mix of products for sales in the
quarter ended March 31, 2005 as compared to 2004.
LW
LW competes with a vast number of e-store websites on the internet. Most of them
are relatively small, but a number of larger e-stores, such as Amazon.com and
Buy.com, dominate in the e-commerce market. Competition is based on having the
products available and shipping expediently and correctly at competitive prices.
Beginning in the third quarter 2004, we have reduced our resources allocated to
our LW's business-to-consumers business segment. As a result, LW's sales
declined from $2,136,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2004 to $47,700
for the comparable period in 2005.
LW's gross profit also decreased from $218,000 for the three months ended March
31, 2004 to $5,700 for the three months ended March 31, 2005.
EXPENSES
- --------
Consolidated selling, general and administrative expenses decreased from
$1,279,400 for the quarter ended March 31, 2004 to $1,094,800 for the quarter
ended March 31, 2005. We continued our overhead reduction effort in 2005. We
reduced our employee count from 52 employees as of March 31, 2004 to 44
employees as of March 31, 2005 and to 24 employees as of April 30, 2005.
Consolidated payroll expenses decreased by $15,800 for the three months ended
March 31, 2005 compared to the same period in 2004. Consolidated professional
service expenses also decreased by $94,900 for the three months ended March 31,
2005 compared to the same period in 2004. The reduction in the sales activities
in LW resulted in a decrease in bank charges of approximately $52,000 for the
quarter ended March 31, 2005 compared to the same period in 2004. We anticipate
a continuing decrease in the number of employees and amounts of expenses if we
are unable to replenish our inventories and increase our sales.
OTHER EXPENSE
- -------------
An asset value recoverability test is performed by the Company on an on-going
basis for our long-lived assets. During the quarter ended March 31, 2005, the
Company recorded an impairment loss of $112,400. The write-down of the property
and equipment was based on projected future utilization of those property and
equipment.
21
LOSS FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS
- -------------------------------
Consolidated loss from continuing operations for the three months ended March
31, 2005 was $851,500 as compared to $267,600 for the three months ended March
31, 2004. The increase in the consolidated loss for the three months ended March
31, 2005 was primarily a result of our inability to fund our purchases and
replenish our inventories during the first quarter of 2005.
DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS
- -----------------------
PMIGA ceased its operations as of April 30, 2005. For financial statement
reporting purposes, the operating results of PMIGA have been reclassified as
discontinued operations. PMIGA's sales were $988,900 for the three months ended
March 31, 2005 as compared to $1,664,200 for the same period in 2004. Net loss
for PMIGA was $154,900 for the three months ended March 31, 2005 as compared to
$42,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2004. The decrease in sales and
increase in losses were the result of the winding down of activities in the
quarter ended March 31, 2005.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
As of March 31, 2005, we had cash and cash equivalents of $1,115,900 and a
working capital deficiency of $4,387,100 and a shareholders' deficiency of
$370,900.
The Company relies on credit terms from its suppliers to fund inventory
purchases. Vendors have progressively imposed more restrictive credit terms,
such that, beginning in March 2005, the Company has been unable to fund
purchases. Currently, the Company's business is limited to selling existing
inventory with no ability to obtain credit to replenish or purchase other items
our customers may need. As of March 31, 2005, inventories were approximately
$343,300, compared to $2,488,900 at December 31, 2004. The Company does not have
the ability to fund the inventory purchases caused by the elimination of terms
by vendors. Because of the reduced sales caused by the lack of new inventory,
the Company has not been able to pay its obligations on a timely basis. The
Company has been sued by one supplier for approximately $680,000 in unpaid
invoices and by another for approximately $80,000. Other creditors have
threatened suit. Unless the Company obtains credit and finds another profitable
method of operating, the Company will be forced to cease operations.
We had a consolidated net loss of $1,010,500 for the three months ended March
31, 2005 as compared to $319,200 for the same period in 2004. We closed our
operations in PMIGA as of April 30, 2005 and reported a loss of $154,900 for the
three months ended March 31, 2005 as discontinued operations for reporting
purposes. We continue to reduce our expenses. The number of Company's staff
decreased from 58 employees on December 31, 2004 to 44 employees on March 31,
2005 and 24 employees on April 30, 2005.
We were in violation of certain loan covenants under our inventory financing
facility with Textron as of March 31, 2005 and a waiver for the violation has
not been obtained. This gives Textron the option to terminate the credit
facility and accelerate the loan payments. If Textron exercised its option to
terminate the credit facility, it is uncertain whether the Company would be able
to obtain alternative financing.
During 2004, the Company was in violation of certain covenants under our real
estate mortgage loan agreement with Wells Fargo. A waiver of the default was
obtained from Wells Fargo through December 31, 2005. As a condition for the
waiver, the Company transferred $250,000 to a restricted account as a reserve
for the debt service. As of March 31, 2005, a reserve of $238,200 remained in
the restricted account which is included in Restricted Cash in non-current
assets in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet. The Company has
not received a waiver of the loan covenant violations beyond December 31, 2005.
On May 10, 2005, the Company filed voluntary petitions to reorganize the
business under Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code in the United
States Bankruptcy Court. Consequently, the Company is required to classify the
Wells Fargo bank loan and the SBA loan as a current liability in the
accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet as of March 31, 2005.
22
Our net cash provided by operating activities for the three months ended March
31, 2005 was $1,495,900, which principally reflected the decreases in accounts
receivable of $1,383,600 and inventories of $2,145,600, which were partly offset
by a decrease in accounts payable of $1,711,500 and the net loss from continuing
operations of $851,500. Our net cash used in financing activities was $923,800
for the three months ended March 31, 2005 primarily resulting from a decrease in
our inventory financing facility loan of $1,173,300, which was partly offset by
a decrease in restricted cash of $266,600.
CAUTIONARY FACTORS THAT MAY AFFECT FUTURE RESULTS
WE MAY NOT EMERGE FROM CHAPTER 11 BANKRUPTCY WITH VALUE FOR OUR SHAREHOLDERS
We cannot be sure that the Bankruptcy Court will approve any plan of
reorganization that we propose. If we are not able to have a plan of
reorganization approved, we may be required to liquidate and cease operations.
Alternatively, we may only be able to achieve a reorganization that eliminates
the equity held by our current stockholders or provides creditors with equity
greatly diluting current stockholders. Consequently, an investment in our stock
at this time must be considered extremely speculative.
WE HAVE EXPERIENCED SEVERE CREDIT RESTRICTIONS FROM OUR VENDORS, AND ARE NOT
CONDUCTING BUSINESS CONSISTENT WITH HISTORICAL PRACTICE
WE FILED FOR BANKRUPTCY PROTECTION ON MAY 10, 2005 THE OUTCOME IS UNCERTAIN
Our vendors have severely reduced the credit they extend to the Company. The
loss of credit terms from vendors has eliminated our ability to purchase
inventory and, therefore, our sales have decreased. Consequently, we have
recently had difficulty paying our obligations on a timely basis. On May 11,
2005 (the "Petition Date"), the Company filed voluntary petitions to reorganize
the businesses under Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code in the
United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Nevada. If we are
unable to correct this situation, find alternative financing or alternative
methods of operations which do not require credit, we will be required to cease
operations.
WE DEPEND ON CREDIT TERMS FROM OUR SUPPLIERS
We depend on the credit and payment terms extended by our suppliers. A reduction
of those credits and shortening those payment terms by our suppliers would
unfavorably affect our cash flows and our ability to maintain certain inventory
levels and sales.
OUR INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT CONTAINS A GOING CONCERN OPINION
We have received a going concern opinion from our auditors. The opinion raises
substantial doubts our ability to continue as a going concern.
23
We incurred a net loss of $1,010,500 for the three months ended March 31, 2005
and a net loss of $1,172,700 for the year ended December 31, 2004 and we most
likely will continue to incur losses. It is uncertain that we can achieve
profitability for our operations and be able to operate our business as a going
concern.
WE CAN PROVIDE NO ASSURANCE THAT WE WILL BE ABLE TO SECURE ADDITIONAL CAPITAL
REQUIRED BY OUR BUSINESS
Currently we are seeking additional capital to satisfy our financing needs for
the next twelve months. If we fail to achieve a profitable level of operations
and raise additional working capital, we will be unable to pursue our business
plan. There is no assurance that we will be able to obtain additional capital,
if available, and that such capital will be available at terms acceptable to us.
POTENTIAL SALES OF ADDITIONAL COMMON STOCK AND SECURITIES CONVERTIBLE INTO OUR
COMMON STOCK MAY DILUTE THE VOTING POWER OF CURRENT HOLDERS.
We may issue equity securities in the future whose terms and rights are superior
to those of our common stock. Our Articles of Incorporation authorize the
issuance of up to 5,000,000 shares of preferred stock. These are "blank check"
preferred shares, meaning our board of directors is authorized to designate and
issue the shares from time to time without shareholder consent. As of December
31, 2004 we had 600 shares of Series A Preferred outstanding. The Series A
Preferred shares are convertible into 800,000 shares of common stock. Any
additional shares of preferred stock that may be issued in the future could be
given voting and conversion rights that could dilute the voting power and equity
of existing holders of shares of common stock, and have preferences over shares
of common stock with respect to dividends and liquidation rights.
WE HAVE VIOLATED CERTAIN FINANCIAL COVENANTS CONTAINED IN OUR LOANS AND MAY DO
SO AGAIN IN THE FUTURE
Pacific Magtron, Inc. (PMI) has a mortgage on our offices with SBA and Wells
Fargo Bank, under which PMI must maintain the following financial covenants:
1) Total liabilities must not be more than twice our tangible net
worth;
2) Net income after taxes must not be less than one dollar on an annual
basis and for no more than two consecutive quarters; and
3) Annual EBITDA of one and one half times the debt must be maintained.
We were in violation of covenants (2) and (3) as of December 31, 2004. We
received a waiver for such violation through December 31, 2005. We cannot assure
you that we will be able to meet all these financial covenants in the future. On
May 10, 2005, the Company filed voluntary petitions to reorganize the business
under Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code in the United States
Bankruptcy Court. Consequently, Wells Fargo and SBA may declare us in default
and accelerate the loan payments.
In May 2003 we obtained a $3,500,000 inventory financing facility of which a $1
million letter of credit facility is used as security for inventory purchased on
terms from vendors in Taiwan from Textron Financial Corporation (Textron). Under
this financing facility, we are required to meet the following financial
covenants:
24
1) Minimum current ratio of 1.0 to 1.0;
2) Maximum leverage of 5.0 for PMI and 6.0 for PMIC;
3) Positive EBITDA on a year-to-date basis for PMI; and
4) Minimum tangible capital funds of $2,500,000.
As of March 31, 2005, we were in violation of the above covenants and a waiver
for such violations has not been obtained. This gives Textron the option to
terminate the credit facility and accelerate the loan payments. It is uncertain
as to the Company's ability to obtain alternative financing in the event Textron
terminated the loan facility and accelerated payments or Wells Fargo or SBA
elected to call the loan.
WE DEPEND ON KEY SUPPLIERS FOR A LARGE PORTION OF OUR INVENTORY. LOSS OF THOSE
SUPPLIERS COULD HARM OUR BUSINESS
One supplier, Sunnyview/Real Wisdom ("Sunnyview"), accounted for approximately
15% of our total purchases for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and for the
year ended December 31, 2004. We do not have a supply contract with Sunnyview or
other vendors, but rather purchase products from them through individual
purchase orders. We have recently had difficulty paying our obligations to our
suppliers on a timely basis and we could not obtain the products that Sunnyview
supplies from other sources. This caused a loss of sales that had a material
adverse effect on our business, financial condition and operating results
beginning in the first quarter of 2005.
OUR COMMON STOCK IS NOT ACTIVELY TRADED
The Company's common stock has been traded on the Over the Counter Bulletin
Board (OCTBB) and our stock has not been actively traded.
IF WE ARE UNABLE TO SECURE PRICE PROTECTION PROVISIONS IN OUR VENDOR AGREEMENTS,
THE VALUE OF OUR INVENTORY WOULD QUICKLY DIMINISH
As a distributor, we incur the risk that the value of our inventory will be
adversely affected by industry wide forces. Rapid technology change is
commonplace in the industry and can quickly diminish the marketability of
certain items, whose functionality and demand decline with the appearance of new
products. These changes and price reductions by vendors may cause rapid
obsolescence of inventory and corresponding valuation reductions in that
inventory. We currently seek provisions in the vendor agreements common to
industry practice that provide price protections or credits for declines in
inventory value and the right to return unsold inventory. No assurance can be
given, however, that we can negotiate such provisions in each of our contracts
or that such industry practice will continue.
EXCESSIVE CLAIMS AGAINST WARRANTIES THAT WE PROVIDE COULD ADVERSELY EFFECT OUR
BUSINESS
Our suppliers generally warrant the products that we distribute and allow us to
return defective products, including those that have been returned to us by
customers. We do not independently warrant the products that we distribute. If
excessive claims are made against these warranties our results of operations
would suffer.
WE MAY NOT BE ABLE TO SUCCESSFULLY COMPETE WITH SOME OF OUR COMPETITORS
25
All aspects of our business are highly competitive. Competition within the
computer products distribution industry is based on product availability, credit
availability, price, speed and accuracy of delivery, effectiveness of sales and
marketing programs, and quality and breadth of product lines. We also compete
with manufacturers that sell directly to resellers and end users. Most of our
competitors are substantially larger and have greater financial and other
resources than we do.
FAILURE TO RECRUIT AND RETAIN QUALIFIED PERSONNEL WILL HARM OUR BUSINESS
We depend upon our ability to attract, hire and retain highly qualified
personnel who possess the skills and experience necessary to meet our personnel
needs. Competition for individuals with proven highly qualifying skills is
intense, and the computer industry in general experiences a high rate of
attrition of such personnel. We compete for such individuals with other
companies as well as temporary personnel agencies. Failure to attract and retain
sufficient qualifying personnel would have a material adverse effect on our
business, operating results and financial condition.
WE ARE DEPENDENT ON KEY PERSONNEL
We depend upon our senior management, including Theodore Li, Chief Financial
Officer and Hui "Cynthia" Lee, head of sales operations. On May 10,2005, the
employment for Mr. Li and Ms. Lee were terminated. The loss of the services of
Mr. Li or Ms. Lee, or one or more other key employees, could have a material
adverse effect on our business, financial condition or operating results.
WE ARE SUBJECT TO RISKS BEYOND OUR CONTROL SUCH AS ECONOMIC AND GENERAL RISKS OF
OUR BUSINESS
We depend upon factors that may be beyond our control and cannot clearly be
predicted at this time. Such factors include general economic conditions, both
nationally and internationally, changes in tax laws, changes in governmental
regulations, including regulations imposed under federal, state or local
environmental laws, labor laws, and trade laws and other trade barriers.
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Our exposure to market risk for changes in interest rates relates primarily to
one of our bank loans with a $2,324,300 balance at March 31, 2005 which bears
fluctuating interest based on the bank's 90-day LIBOR rate. We believe that
fluctuations in interest rates in the near term would not materially affect our
consolidated operating results, financial position or cash flow. We are not
exposed to material risk based on exchange rate fluctuation or commodity price
fluctuation.
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
(a) Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures.
Our management, with the participation of our principal executive officer and
principal financial officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of the design and
effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended)
as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report. Based on this
evaluation, our principal executive officer and principal financial officer
concluded, as of the end of such period, that these disclosure controls and
procedures are effective and designed to ensure that the information required to
be disclosed in our reports filed or submitted under the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the requisite
time periods.
26
(b) Changes in Internal Controls.
There was no change in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined
in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended) identified in connection with the evaluation of our internal control
performed during our last fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial
reporting.
27
PART II
ITEM 1. - LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
On May 10, 2005 (the "Petition Date"), PMIC, PMI and 3 direct and indirect
wholly owned subsidiaries filed voluntary petitions to reorganize their
businesses under Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code in the United
States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Nevada, [ ] Division (the
"Bankruptcy Court"). The Bankruptcy Court is jointly administering these cases
as "In re: Pacific Magtron International Corporation, Inc., et al., Case No.
BK-S-05-14325 LBR."
During the quarter ended March 31, 2005, the Company has been sued by AG Neovo
Technology Corporation and Micro Technology Concepts, Inc. for unpaid invoices
for approximately $81,000 and $680,000, respectively.
ITEM 3. - DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES.
Defaults under our inventory financing facility with Textron, our mortgage loan
withy Wells Fargo Bank and our Small Business Administration Loan are discussed
above in Note 6 to our Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements and under
"Liquidity and Capital Resources" on page 21. In addition, all of our loan
agreements contain provide that the filing of a voluntary petition in bankruptcy
is a default under the loans. However, under bankruptcy law, those provisions
are unenforceable.
ITEM 6. - EXHIBITS
(a) Exhibits
Exhibit Description Reference
- ------- ----------- ---------
3.1 Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation (1)
3.2 Amended and Restated Bylaws (1)
31.1 Certificate of Chief Executive Officer
pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 *
31.2 Certificate of Chief Financial Officer
pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 *
32.1 Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 *
(1) Incorporated by reference from the Company's registration statement on Form
10SB-12G filed January 20, 1999.
* Filed herewith
28
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
PACIFIC MAGTRON INTERNATIONAL
CORP.,
a Nevada corporation
Date: May 23, 2005 By: /s/ Martin Nielson
-------------------------
Martin Nielson
President and Chief Executive
Officer
29