UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington,
DC 20549
Form
10-Q
(Mark
one)
ý |
|
QUARTERLY
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE ACT
OF 1934 |
For
the quarterly period ended March 31, 2005
OR
o |
|
TRANSITION
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934 |
For
the transition period from
to
Commission
file
number 0-24230
FIBERSTARS,
INC.
(Exact
name of registrant as specified in its charter)
California |
|
94-3021850 |
(State
or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |
|
(I.R.S.
Employer Identification No.) |
|
|
|
44259
Nobel Drive, Fremont, CA
(Address
of principal executive offices) |
|
|
|
94538
(Zip
Code) |
(Registrant’s
telephone number, including area code): (510)
490-0719 |
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be
filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required
to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for
the past 90 days. Yes ý No
o
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule
12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No
ý
The
number of outstanding shares of the registrants’ Common Stock, $0.0001 par
value, as of April 30, 2005 was 7,422,073
TABLE
OF CONTENTS
Part
I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION |
|
|
|
|
Item
1 |
Financial
Statements: |
|
a. |
Condensed
Consolidated Balance Sheets at March 31, 2005 (unaudited) and December 31,
2004 |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
b. |
Condensed
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Three Months Ended March 31,
2005 and 2004 (unaudited)
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
c. |
Condensed
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Operations for the Three Months
Ended March 31, 2005 and 2004 (unaudited)
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
d. |
Condensed
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the three months Ended March 31,
2005 and 2004 (unaudited)
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
e. |
Notes
to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)
|
7 |
Item
2 |
Management’s
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
|
10 |
|
|
|
Item
3 |
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
|
20 |
|
|
|
Item
4 |
Controls
and Procedures
|
20 |
|
|
|
Part
II - OTHER INFORMATION |
|
|
|
Item
1 |
Legal
Proceedings
|
21 |
|
|
|
Item
6 |
Exhibits
|
21 |
|
|
|
|
Signatures
|
22 |
Item
1. Financial
Statements
FIBERSTARS,
INC.
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEETS
(amounts
in thousands)
|
|
March
31,
2005 |
|
December
31,
2004 |
|
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
|
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
829 |
|
$ |
3,609 |
|
Accounts
receivable, net |
|
|
8,121 |
|
|
7,224 |
|
Notes
and other accounts receivable |
|
|
57 |
|
|
152 |
|
Inventories,
net |
|
|
8,339 |
|
|
8,433 |
|
Prepaids
and other current assets |
|
|
463 |
|
|
455 |
|
Total
current assets |
|
|
17,809 |
|
|
19,873 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed
assets, net |
|
|
2,660 |
|
|
2,604 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
4,208 |
|
|
4,279 |
|
Intangibles,
net |
|
|
137 |
|
|
150 |
|
Other
assets |
|
|
114 |
|
|
112 |
|
Total
assets |
|
$ |
24,928 |
|
$ |
27,018 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts
payable |
|
$ |
2,128 |
|
$ |
2,920 |
|
Tax
payable |
|
|
11 |
|
|
- |
|
Accrued
liabilities |
|
|
1,886 |
|
|
2,374 |
|
Short-term
bank borrowings |
|
|
37 |
|
|
38 |
|
Total
current liabilities |
|
|
4,062 |
|
|
5,332 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term
bank borrowings |
|
|
447 |
|
|
484 |
|
Total
liabilities |
|
|
4,509 |
|
|
5,816 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments
and contingencies (Note 9) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SHAREHOLDERS’
EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common
stock |
|
|
1 |
|
|
1 |
|
Additional
paid-in capital |
|
|
27,824 |
|
|
27,520 |
|
Unearned
stock-based compensation |
|
|
(422 |
) |
|
(490 |
) |
Accumulated
other comprehensive income |
|
|
557 |
|
|
661 |
|
Accumulated
deficit |
|
|
(7,541 |
) |
|
(6,490 |
) |
Total
shareholders’ equity |
|
|
20,419 |
|
|
21,202 |
|
Total
liabilities and shareholders’ equity |
|
$ |
24,928 |
|
$ |
27,018 |
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements
FIBERSTARS,
INC.
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(amounts
in thousands except per share amounts)
(unaudited)
|
|
Three
months
ended
March 31, |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
Net
sales |
|
$ |
6,820 |
|
$ |
6,008 |
|
Cost
of sales |
|
|
4,277 |
|
|
3,907 |
|
Gross
profit |
|
|
2,543 |
|
|
2,101 |
|
Operating
expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research
and development |
|
|
477 |
|
|
270 |
|
Sales
and marketing |
|
|
2,320 |
|
|
1,977 |
|
General
and administrative |
|
|
811 |
|
|
623 |
|
Total
operating expenses |
|
|
3,608 |
|
|
2,870 |
|
Loss
from operations |
|
|
(1,065 |
) |
|
(769 |
) |
Other
income (expense): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
income |
|
|
3 |
|
|
15 |
|
Interest
expense, net |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss
before income taxes |
|
|
(1,066 |
) |
|
(763 |
) |
Benefit
from (provision for) income taxes |
|
|
15 |
|
|
(1 |
) |
Net
loss |
|
$ |
(1,051 |
) |
$ |
(764 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
loss per share - basic and diluted |
|
$ |
(0.14 |
) |
$ |
(0.11 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
used in computing net income per share - basic and diluted |
|
|
7,550 |
|
|
7,052 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial
statements
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE OPERATIONS
(amounts
in thousands)
(unaudited)
|
|
Three
Months Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
Net
loss |
|
$ |
(1,051 |
) |
$ |
(764 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
comprehensive income (loss), net of tax: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign
currency translation adjustments |
|
|
(142 |
) |
|
34 |
|
Benefit
(provision) for income taxes |
|
|
38 |
|
|
(12 |
) |
Comprehensive
loss |
|
$ |
(1,155 |
) |
$ |
(742 |
) |
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial
statements
FIBERSTARS,
INC.
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(amounts
in thousands)
(unaudited)
|
|
Three
months Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
Cash
flows from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
Net
loss |
|
$ |
(1,051 |
) |
$ |
(764 |
) |
Adjustments
to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating
activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation
and amortization |
|
|
270 |
|
|
233 |
|
Stock-based
compensation |
|
|
33 |
|
|
— |
|
Provision
for doubtful accounts receivables |
|
|
— |
|
|
15 |
|
Accounts
receivable |
|
|
(926 |
) |
|
2,161 |
|
Notes
and other receivables |
|
|
26 |
|
|
43 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
37 |
|
|
(193 |
) |
Prepaids
and other current assets |
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
(400 |
) |
Other
assets |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
19 |
|
Accounts
payable |
|
|
(785 |
) |
|
150
|
|
Accrued
and other current liabilities |
|
|
(343 |
) |
|
(663 |
) |
Total
adjustments |
|
|
(1,700 |
) |
|
(2,995 |
) |
Net
cash used in operating activities |
|
|
(2,751 |
) |
|
(3,759 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
flows from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition
of fixed assets |
|
|
(325 |
) |
|
(163 |
) |
Net
cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(325 |
) |
|
(163 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
flows from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
proceeds from exercise of stock options |
|
|
339 |
|
|
1,000
|
|
Proceeds
from short-term bank borrowings and bank overdraft, net |
|
|
— |
|
|
88 |
|
Collection
of loan made to shareholder |
|
|
— |
|
|
224 |
|
Repayment
of other long-term liabilities |
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
— |
|
Net
cash provided by financing activities |
|
|
328 |
|
|
1,312 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect
of exchange rate changes on cash |
|
|
(32 |
) |
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
decrease in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(2,780 |
) |
|
(2,606 |
) |
Cash
and cash equivalents, beginning of period |
|
|
3,609 |
|
|
4,254 |
|
Cash
and cash equivalents, end of period |
|
$ |
829 |
|
$ |
1,648 |
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial
statements
FIBERSTARS,
INC.
NOTES
TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
March
31, 2005
(Unaudited)
1.
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Interim
Financial Statements (unaudited)
Although
unaudited, the interim financial statements in this report reflect all
adjustments, consisting of all normal recurring adjustments, which are, in the
opinion of management, necessary for a fair statement of financial position,
results of operations and cash flows for the interim periods covered and of the
financial condition of Fiberstars, Inc. (the “Company”) at the interim balance
sheet dates. The results of operations for the interim periods presented are not
necessarily indicative of the results expected for the entire year.
Year-end
Balance Sheet
The
year-end balance sheet information was derived from audited financial statements
but does not include all disclosures required by accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America (“US GAAP”). These financial statements
should be read in conjunction with the Company’s audited financial statements
and notes thereto for the year ended December 31, 2004, contained in the
Company’s 2004 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Foreign
Currency Translation
The
Company’s international subsidiaries use their local currency as their
functional currency. For those subsidiaries, assets and liabilities are
translated at exchange rates in effect at the balance sheet date and income and
expense accounts at average exchange rates during the year. Resulting
translation adjustments are recorded to a separate component of shareholders’
equity.
Earnings
Per Share
Basic
earnings per share (“EPS”) is computed by dividing income available to
shareholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the
period. Diluted EPS is computed by giving effect to all dilutive potential
common shares that were outstanding during the period. Dilutive potential common
shares consist of incremental shares upon exercise of stock options and
warrants.
A
reconciliation of the numerator and denominator of basic and diluted EPS is
provided as follows (in thousands, except per share amounts):
|
|
Three
months ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
Numerator
- Basic and Diluted EPS |
|
|
|
|
|
Net
loss |
|
$ |
(1,051 |
) |
$ |
(764 |
) |
Denominator
- Basic and Diluted EPS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
average shares outstanding |
|
|
7,550 |
|
|
7,052 |
|
Basic
and Diluted net loss per share |
|
$ |
(0.14 |
) |
$ |
(0.11 |
) |
For all
periods presented the shares outstanding used for calculating basic and diluted
EPS include 114,625 shares of common stock issuable for no cash consideration
upon exercise of certain exchange provisions of warrants held by Advanced
Lighting Technologies, Inc. ("ADLT").
At March
31, 2005, options and warrants to purchase 2,076,000 shares of common stock were
outstanding, but were not included in the calculation of diluted EPS because
their inclusion would have been antidilutive. Options and warrants to purchase
1,661,000 shares of common stock were outstanding at March 31, 2004, but were
not included in the calculation of diluted EPS because their inclusion would
have been antidilutive.
Stock-Based
Compensation
The
Company accounts for stock-based compensation plans under the recognition and
measurement principles of APB Opinion No. 25, Accounting
for Stock Issued to Employees, and
related Interpretations. The following table illustrates the effect on net
income (loss) and earnings per share if the Company had applied the fair value
recognition provisions of FASB Statement No. 123, Accounting
for Stock-Based Compensation, to
stock-based employee compensation (in
thousands, except per share amounts):
|
|
Three
months ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
Net
loss, as reported |
|
$ |
(1,051 |
) |
$ |
(764 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Add:
Stock-based employee compensation expense included in reported net income
(loss), net of related tax effects |
|
|
5 |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deduct:
Total stock-based employee compensation expense determined under fair
value based method for all awards, net of related tax
effects |
|
|
(116 |
) |
|
(40 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
loss, Pro forma |
|
$ |
(1,162 |
) |
$ |
(804 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
and Diluted net loss per share—As reported |
|
$ |
(
0.14 |
) |
$ |
(0.11 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
and Diluted net loss per share—Pro forma |
|
$ |
(0.15 |
) |
$ |
(0.11 |
) |
Product
Warranties:
The
Company warrants finished goods against defects in material and workmanship
under normal use and service for periods of one to three years for illuminators
and fiber. A liability for the estimated future costs under product warranties
is maintained for products outstanding under warranty (in thousands):
|
|
Three
months ended
March
31, |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
Balance
at the beginning of the period |
|
$ |
430 |
|
$ |
330 |
|
Accruals
for warranties issued during the period |
|
|
82 |
|
|
142 |
|
Settlements
made during the period (in cash or in kind) |
|
|
(119 |
) |
|
(107 |
) |
Balance
at the end of the period |
|
$ |
393 |
|
$ |
345 |
|
2.
Inventories
Inventories
are stated at the lower of standard cost (which approximates actual cost
determined using the first-in, first-out cost method) or market and consist of
the following (in thousands):
|
|
March
31,
2005 |
|
December
31,
2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Raw
materials |
|
$ |
6,268 |
|
$ |
6,441 |
|
Inventory
Reserve |
|
|
(573 |
) |
|
(513 |
) |
Finished
goods |
|
|
2,644 |
|
|
2,505 |
|
|
|
$ |
8,339 |
|
$ |
8,433 |
|
3.
Bank Borrowings
The
Company has a $5,000,000 Loan and Security Agreement (Accounts Receivable and
Inventory) dated December 7, 2001, with Comerica Bank bearing interest equal to
prime plus 0.25% per annum computed daily or a fixed rate term option of LIBOR
plus 3%. Borrowings under this Loan and Security Agreement are collateralized by
the Company’s assets and intellectual property. Specific borrowings are tied to
accounts receivable and inventory balances, and the Company must comply with
covenants with respect to, among other items, effective net worth and financial
ratios. The Company had no borrowings against this facility as of March 31, 2005
and December 31, 2004, respectively. The Company was not in conformity with
certain of its bank covenants as of March 31, 2005. Effective April 27, 2005,
the Company and Comerica Bank amended the Loan and Security Agreement revising
certain of the covenants thereby bringing the Company into compliance with all
aspects of this credit facility as of the date of the amendment. As amended,
this credit facility expires September 1, 2005.
Through
its U.K. subsidiary, the Company maintains a bank overdraft facility of $472,000
(in UK pounds sterling, based on the exchange rate at March 31, 2005) under an
agreement with Lloyds Bank Plc. The Company had no borrowings against this
facility as of March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004, respectively. This facility
is subject to annual renewal on January 1 and bears interest equal to 7% per
annum.
Through
its German subsidiary, the Company maintains a credit facility under an
agreement with Sparkasse Neumarkt Bank. This credit facility is in place to
finance, and is secured by, the Company’s offices in Berching, Germany, owned
and occupied by the Company’s German subsidiary. As of
March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004 the Company had total borrowings against
this credit facility of $447,000 and $477,000, respectively (in
Euros, based on the exchange rate at March 31, 2005 and at December 31, 2004,
respectively). This credit facility comes due in 2008. In
addition, the Company’s German subsidiary has a revolving line of credit of
$262,000 (in Euros, based on the exchange rate at March 31, 2005) with Sparkasse
Neumarkt Bank. As of March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004, there was no
borrowing against this facility. The revolving facility is subject to annual
renewal on January 1 and bears interest equal to 8.75% per annum.
4.
Comprehensive Operations
Comprehensive
income (loss) is defined as net income (loss) plus sales, expenses, gains and
losses that, under US GAAP, are included in comprehensive income (loss) but
excluded from net income (loss). A separate statement of comprehensive
operations has been presented with this report.
5.
Segments and Geographic Information
The
Company operates in a single industry segment that manufactures, markets and
sells fiber optic lighting products. The Company has two primary product lines:
the pool and spa lighting product line and the commercial lighting product line,
each of which markets and sells fiber optic lighting products. The Company
markets its products for worldwide distribution primarily through independent
sales representatives, distributors and swimming pool builders in North America,
Europe and the Far East.
A summary
of sales by geographic area is as follows (in thousands):
|
|
Three
months ended
March
31, |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United
States |
|
$ |
4,887 |
|
$ |
4,012 |
|
United
Kingdom |
|
|
1,040 |
|
|
1,000 |
|
Germany |
|
|
709 |
|
|
842 |
|
Other
Countries |
|
|
184 |
|
|
154 |
|
|
|
$ |
6,820 |
|
$ |
6,008 |
|
Geographic
sales are categorized based on the location of the customer to whom the sales
are made.
A summary
of sales by product line is as follows (in thousands):
|
|
Three
months ended
March
31, |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pool
and Spa Lighting |
|
$ |
3,688 |
|
$ |
3,058 |
|
Commercial
Lighting |
|
|
3,132 |
|
|
2,950 |
|
|
|
$ |
6,820 |
|
$ |
6,008 |
|
A summary
of geographic fixed assets is as follows (in thousands):
|
|
March
31,
2005 |
|
December
31,
2004 |
|
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
|
|
United
States |
|
$ |
1,766 |
|
$ |
1,624 |
|
Germany |
|
|
762 |
|
|
843 |
|
Other
Countries |
|
|
132 |
|
|
137 |
|
|
|
$ |
2,660 |
|
$ |
2,604 |
|
6.
Recent pronouncements
In
December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 123 (revised 2004) (“SFAS 123R”),
“Share-Based Payments.” SFAS 123R requires all entities to recognize
compensation expense in an amount equal to the fair value of share-based
payments, such as stock options granted to employees. The Company
will apply SFAS 123R on a modified prospective method. Under this method,
the Company will be required to record compensation expense as previous awards
continue to vest, for the unvested portion of previously granted awards that
remain outstanding at the date of adoption. In addition, the Company may elect
to adopt SFAS 123R on a retrospective method by restating previously issued
financial statements, basing the amounts on the expense previously calculated
and reported in their pro forma disclosures that had been required by SFAS 123.
SFAS 123R is effective for the first fiscal year beginning after December 15,
2005, and as such will be adopted from the first quarter of 2006. The adoption
of SFAS 123R will increase stock-based compensation expense and reduce earnings,
with no or little impact on our overall financial position.
In
December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No.151, “Inventory Costs,” which
amends part of ARB 43, “Inventory Pricing,” concerning the treatment of certain
types of inventory costs. The provisions of ARB No.
43 provided
that certain
inventory-related costs, such as double freight, re-handling, might be “so
abnormal” that they should be charged against current earnings rather than be
included in the cost of inventory. As amended by SFAS No.
151, the
“so-abnormal” criterion has been eliminated. Thus, all such (abnormal) costs are
required to be treated as current-period charges under all circumstances. In
addition, fixed production overhead should be allocated based on the normal
capacity of the production facilities, with unallocated overhead charged to
expense when incurred. SFAS 151 is required to be adopted for fiscal years
beginning after June 15, 2005. The Company is assessing the impact of adopting
SFAS No.151, but does not believe its adoption will have a material impact on
overall financial position.
7.
Goodwill and Acquired Intangibles
In
accordance with SFAS 142, goodwill is subject to an annual impairment test and
earlier upon certain conditions. The Company performs the test in the fourth
quarter of every year. The tests showed no impairment of the Company’s goodwill
asset as of the quarter ended December 31, 2004.
In
February 2000, the Company purchased certain assets of Unison Fiber Optic
Systems, Inc. and accounted for the acquisition as a purchase. Acquired
intangible assets consisting of patents, trademarks, workforce and customer
lists, are being amortized using the straight-line method over the estimated
useful life of the assets, ranging from 3 to 7 years.
8.
Income Taxes
A full
valuation allowance is recorded against the Company’s U.S. deferred tax assets
as management cannot conclude, based on available objective evidence, when the
gross value of its deferred tax assets, consisting of will be realized. The
Company accrues foreign tax expenses or benefits as these are incurred.
9.
Subsequent Event
The
Company is currently involved in a lawsuit brought by one of our competitors in
the swimming pool and spa market, Pentair Water Pool and Spa, Inc. In a lawsuit
filed against the Company on April 5, 2005 in the United States District Court,
Northern District of California, Pentair alleges that the manufacture, use and
sale of the Company’s FX Pool Light infringes three United States patents which
Pentair claims to own relevant to certain synchronized light technology, U.S.
Patent No. 6,379,025 B1, No. 6,002,216 and No. 6,811,286. In the lawsuit,
Pentair is attempting to stop the Company from selling certain of its
synchronized pool light products and to obtain compensatory and treble damages.
The Company’s initial response to these allegations has not as yet been filed.
If the Company does not prevail, we may be ordered to pay damages for past sales
and an ongoing royalty for future sales of products found to infringe. The
Company could also be ordered to stop selling the challenged FX Pool Light
product. If found liable, the Company may or may not be able to redesign
its products to avoid future infringement. Any public announcement
concerning the litigation that is unfavorable to the Company may result in a
decline in our stock price.
Item
2. Management’s
Discussion and Analysis of Results of Operations and Financial
Condition
The
following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of
operations should be read in conjunction with the Condensed Consolidated
Financial Statements and related notes included elsewhere in this report and the
section entitled “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2004. [AJP to update next rev]
When
used in this discussion, the words "expects," "anticipates," "estimates,"
”plan,” and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking
statements. These statements, which include statements as to our future
operating results, net sales growth, gross profit margin improvement, sources of
revenues, expected operating expenses and capital expenditure levels, expected
increase in accounting and legal fees, expenses associated with complying with
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, expected decrease in credits for government
contracts under DARPA, our reliance on a limited number of customers, our
expected cash flows, our inventories, the adequacy of capital resources and
necessity to raise additional funds, our critical accounting policies, future
growth in fiber optic lighting, anticipated demand for our products, expected
benefits of outsourcing manufacturing expansion of our manufacturing
capabilities our future products, statements regarding claims involving our
intellectual property, and our dependency on certain employees and our ability
to attract qualified personnel are subject to risks and uncertainties that could
cause actual results to differ materially from those projected. These risks and
uncertainties include, but are not limited to, those risks discussed below, as
well as our ability to retain and obtain customer and distributor relationships,
our ability to maintain relationships with strategic partners and ADLT, our
ability to manage expenses and inventory levels, our ability to reduce
manufacturing overhead and general and administrative expenses as a percentage
of sales, our ability to increase cash balances in future quarters, the cost of
enforcing or defending intellectual property, risks relating to developing and
marketing new products, the ability of our lighting products to meet customer
expectations, manufacturing difficulties, unforeseen adverse competitive,
economic or other factors that may impact our cash position, risks associated
with raising additional funds, loss or failure to attract qualified personnel,
possible delays in the release of products, risks associated with the evolution
and growth of the fiber optic lighting market, trends in price performance and
adoption rates of fiber optic lighting products in Europe and the United States,
our dependence on a limited number of suppliers for components and distributors
for sales, and the impact of technological advances and competitive products;
and the matters discussed in "Factors That May Affect Results." These
forward-looking statements speak only as of the date hereof. We expressly
disclaim any obligation or undertaking to release publicly any updates or
revisions to any forward-looking statements contained herein to reflect any
change in our expectations with regard thereto or any change in events,
conditions or circumstances on which any such statement is
based.]
RESULTS
OF OPERATIONS
In the
first quarter of 2005 the Company experienced an improved market for its
products, particularly increased demand for pool lighting products as it
introduced several new feature lights. Commercial lighting sales also
experienced increased demand for its EFO™ products. We believe customers of
commercial lighting products are placing an increased importance upon energy
efficiency which tends to improve the competitive position of our EFO® products.
We believe that our future success depends upon a stable market for fiber optic
lighting products along with our ability to penetrate the mainstream lighting
markets based on the improved energy efficiency of our EFO® products and
technology.
Net sales
increased 14% to $6,820,000 for the quarter ended March 31, 2005 as
compared to $6,008,000 for the quarter ended March 31, 2004. This increase
resulted primarily from a 21% increase in pool lighting sales attributable
largely to increased in-ground fiber product sales which increased by $1.1
million, largely a result of the introduction of the Company’s new Lighted
Laminar Flow product, and was partially offset by spa product sales which
decreased by $0.5 million. Commercial lighting sales increased by 6% for the
three months ended March 31, 2005 as compared to the three months ended March
31, 2004 , an increase attributable to increased sales of our EFOTM
systems
in commercial lighting markets. EFO™ sales for the quarter were $310,000
compared to sales of $132,000 for the first quarter in 2004. We expect
net sales to increase in 2005 due to an anticipated increase in demand for
EFOTM systems
in commercial lighting markets and expected continued growth in demand of our
pool products. However, the market for our products is highly dependent upon
general economic conditions.
Gross
profit of $2,543,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2005 increased 21%
compared to $2,101,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2004. Gross profit
as a percentage of sales increased to 37% for the quarter ended March 31, 2005
as compared to 35 % for the quarter ended March 31, 2004. This increase in gross
profit margin was attributable to improved gross profit margin for the pool
lighting business, up 5% from the first quarter of 2004, and by an increase
in gross profit margin in our commercial lighting business of 1%. We expect
gross profit margin to be approximately the same as in 2005 as compared to 2004,
depending upon general economic conditions.
Research
and development expenses were $477,000 in the first quarter of fiscal 2005, an
increase of $207,000 compared with the first quarter of fiscal 2004. We
increased spending on personnel and on project costs related to government
contract work and improvements for existing products. Net research and
development expenses also increased as a result of lower credits received in the
first quarter of 2005 for achieving milestones under a development contract with
the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, or DARPA, as compared to the
first quarter of 2004. We expect research and development expenses to increase
in 2005 due to a reduction in credits scheduled to take place under existing
DARPA contracts. The gross research and development spending along with credits
from government contracts is shown in the table:
|
|
Three
months ended
March
31,
(in
thousands) |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
Gross
expenses for research and development |
|
$ |
938 |
|
$ |
857 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deduct:
credits from DARPA & DOE |
|
|
(461 |
) |
|
(587 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
research and development expense |
|
$ |
477 |
|
$ |
270 |
|
Sales and
marketing expenses increased by 17% to $2,320,000 for the quarter ended March
31, 2005 as compared to $1,977,000 for the quarter ended March 31, 2004. This
increase was largely due to an increase in marketing expenses for our EFO™
products in the U.S. and Europe of $166,000 combined with increased sales
commission expenses of $110,000 as a result of higher commission overage
charges. We expect sales and marketing expenses to increase in absolute dollars
in 2005 compared to 2004.
General
and administrative costs were $811,000 in the three months ended March 31, 2005,
a 30% increase compared to $624,00 for the three months ended March 31, 2004.
This change resulted primarily from increased accounting fees. We currently do
not qualify for accelerated filing status with the SEC as a result of measuring
our market capitalization as of June 30, 2004. Our market capitalization will be
re-measured on June 30, 2005. On that date, if the value of our shares held by
non-affiliates is at or above $75 million, we will be required to comply with
Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Estimates of costs required in
order to comply with Section 404 for a company of our size range in the order of
$500,000 or higher, independent of additional audit fees. Such additional
expenses would be incurred in the fiscal year 2005. Even if we are not required
to adopt Section 404 this year, we expect general and administrative expenses to
increase in 2005 as compared to 2004 due to anticipated higher accounting fees
and expenses associated with the impact of the Sarbanes- Oxley Act of 2002 and
anticipated increased legal fees and costs associated with certain ongoing
litigation.
We have a
full valuation allowance against our deferred tax assets. There was no operating
statement tax expense or benefit for our United States operations in the first
quarter of 2005 as any expected benefit was offset by an increase in our
valuation allowance. The $15,000 tax benefit shown for the first quarter of 2005
is a result of deferred tax for our German operations which experienced a loss
in the quarter. We took a non-cash charge of $2,405,000 in 2002 to record an
initial valuation allowance against our deferred tax asset in accordance with
FASB 109.
We
recorded a net operating loss of $1,065,000 in the three months ended March 31,
2005 as compared to a net operating loss of $769,000 for the three months ended
March 31, 2004. The increase in our operating loss was due primarily due to our
increased operating expenses in the quarter ended March 31, 2005 compared to
operating expenses in the quarter ended March 31, 2004.
LIQUIDITY
AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Cash
and cash equivalents
At March
31, 2005, our cash and cash equivalents were $829,000 as compared to $3,609,000
at December 31, 2004, a net cash decrease of $2,780,000 during the first three
months of 2005. This compares to a net cash decrease of $2,606,000 for the same
period in 2004, and an ending cash balance of $1,648,000 as of March 31,
2004.
Due to
seasonality in the sales of our pool lighting products, our cash balances tend
to decrease in the first half of the year and increase in the second half of the
year. While we expect to see this same pattern this year, the market for our
products is highly dependent upon general economic conditions.
We had no
borrowings against our U.S. line of credit at March 31, 2005 and at December 31,
2004.
Cash from
operations decreased during the first three months of 2005 primarily due to a
net loss of $1,051,000, an increase in trade receivables of $926,000, offset by
a decrease in accounts payable and accrued liabilities of $785,000 and
$343,000, respectively. These uses of cash from operations were partially offset
by depreciation and amortization of $270,000. After adjustments for these and
other non-cash items, our total net cash used in operating activities in the
first quarter of 2005 was $2,751,000 compared to cash used in operating
activities of $3,759,000 in the first quarter of 2004.
Cash
Used in Investing Activities
Investing
activities used cash of $325,000 during the first three months of 2005, compared
to $163,000 for the first three months of 2004. During both periods, cash was
used for the acquisition of fixed assets.
Cash
Provided by Financing Activities
Financing
activities contributed $328,000 to cash during the quarter ended March 31, 2005.
This net contribution was due primarily to the proceeds from the exercise of
employee stock options. For the same period in 2004, financing activities from
the exercise of employee stock options of $1,000,000, bank borrowings of $88,000
and $224,000 in cash from collection of a loan, contributed $1,312,000 to
cash.
We have a
$5,000,000 Loan and Security Agreement (Accounts Receivable and Inventory) dated
December 7, 2001, with Comerica Bank bearing interest equal to prime plus 0.25%
per annum computed daily or a fixed rate term option of LIBOR plus 3%.
Borrowings under this Loan and Security Agreement are collateralized by our
assets and intellectual property. Specific borrowings are tied to accounts
receivable and inventory balances, and we must comply with certain covenants
with respect to, among other items, effective net worth and financial ratios. We
had no borrowings against this facility as of March 31, 2005 and December 31,
2004. We were not in conformity with certain of its bank covenants as of March
31, 2005. Effective April 27, 2005, Fiberstars and Comerica Bank amended the
Loan and Security Agreement revising certain of the covenants thereby bringing
the us into compliance with all aspects of this credit facility as of the
amendment. As amended, this credit facility expires September 1,
2005.
.
Through
our U.K. subsidiary, we maintain a bank overdraft facility of $472,000 (in UK
pounds sterling based on the exchange rate at March 31, 2005) under an agreement
with Lloyds Bank Plc. We had no borrowings against this facility as of March 31,
2005 and December 31, 2004. This facility is subject to annual renewal on
January 1 each year and bears an interest rate equal to 7% per
annum.
Through
our German subsidiary, we maintain a credit facility under an agreement with
Sparkasse Neumarkt Bank. This credit facility is in place to finance, and is
secured by, our offices in Berching, Germany, owned and occupied by our German
subsidiary. As of
March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004, we had total borrowings against this
credit facility of $447,000 and $477,000, respectively (in
Euros, based on the exchange rate at March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004,
respectively). This
credit facility comes due in 2008. In addition, our German subsidiary maintains
a revolving line of credit of $262,000 (in Euros, based on the exchange rate at
March 31, 2005) with Sparkasse Neumarkt Bank. As of March 31, 2005 and December
31, 2004, there was no borrowing against this facility. The revolving facility
is subject to annual renewal on January 1 and bears an interest rate equal to
8.75% per annum.
We
believe that our existing cash balances and funds available to us through our
bank lines of credit together with funds that we anticipate generating from our
operations, will be sufficient to finance our currently anticipated working
capital requirements and capital expenditure requirements for the next twelve
months. However, a sudden increase in product demand requiring a
significant increase in manufacturing capability, or unforeseen adverse
competitive, economic or other factors may impact our cash position, and thereby
affect operations. From time to time we may be required to raise
additional funds through public or private financing, strategic relationships or
other arrangements. There can be no assurance that such funding, if
needed, will be available on terms acceptable to us, or at all.
Furthermore, any additional equity financing may be dilutive to shareholders,
and debt financing, if available, may involve restrictive covenants. Strategic
arrangements, if necessary to raise additional funds, may require that we
relinquish rights to certain of our technologies or products. Failure to
generate sufficient revenues or to raise capital when needed could have an
adverse impact on our business, operating results and financial condition, as
well as our ability to achieve intended business objectives.
Recently
Issued Accounting Pronouncements
In
December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 123 (revised 2004) or SFAS 123R,
“Share-Based Payments.” SFAS 123R requires all entities to recognize
compensation expense in an amount equal to the fair value of share-based
payments, such as stock options granted to employees. We will apply SFAS 123R on
a modified prospective method. Under this method, we are required to record
compensation expense (as previous awards continue to vest) for the unvested
portion of previously granted awards that remain outstanding at the date of
adoption. In addition, we may elect to adopt SFAS 123R on a retrospective method
by restating previously issued financial statements, basing the amounts on the
expense previously calculated and reported in their pro forma disclosures that
had been required by SFAS 123. SFAS 123R is effective for the first fiscal year
beginning after December 15, 2005. We have not completed our evaluation of the
effect that SFAS 123R will have, but we believe that when adopted it will
increase stock-based compensation expense and reduce earnings, with no or little
impact on our overall financial position.
In
December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No.151, “Inventory Costs,” which
amends part of ARB 43, “Inventory Pricing,” concerning the treatment of certain
types of inventory costs. The provisions of ARB No.
43 provided
that certain
inventory-related costs, such as double freight, re-handling, might be “so
abnormal” that they should be charged against current earnings rather than be
included in the cost of inventory. As amended by SFAS No.
151, the
“so-abnormal” criterion has been eliminated. Thus, all such (abnormal) costs are
required to be treated as current-period charges under all circumstances. In
addition, fixed production overhead should be allocated based on the normal
capacity of the production facilities, with unallocated overhead charged to
expense when incurred. SFAS 151 is required to be adopted for fiscal years
beginning after June 15, 2005. We are assessing the impact of adopting SFAS
No.151, but do not believe its adoption will have a material impact on our
overall financial position.
Factors
that May Affect Results
Our
operating results are subject to fluctuations caused by many factors that could
result in decreased revenues and a drop in the price of our common
stock.
Our
quarterly operating results can vary significantly depending upon a number of
factors. It is difficult to predict the lighting market's acceptance of and
demand for our products on a quarterly basis, and the level and timing of orders
received can fluctuate substantially. Our sales volumes fluctuate, as does the
relative volume of sales of our various products with significantly different
product margins. Historically we have shipped a substantial portion of our
quarterly sales in the last month of each of the second and fourth quarters of
the year. Our product development and marketing expenditures may vary
significantly from quarter to quarter and are made well in advance of potential
resulting revenue. If we are not able to meet certain milestones in our DARPA
contracts, research and development funding may be lost or delayed resulting in
higher expenses. Significant portions of our expenses are relatively fixed in
advance based upon our forecasts of future sales. If sales fall below our
expectations in any given quarter, we will not be able to make any significant
adjustment in our operating expenses, and our operating results will be
adversely affected.
Our
sales are dependent upon new construction levels and are subject to seasonal and
general economic trends.
Sales of
our pool and spa lighting products, which currently are available only with
newly constructed pools and spas, depend substantially upon the level of new
construction of pools. Sales of commercial lighting products also depend
significantly upon the level of new building construction and renovation.
Construction levels are affected by housing market trends, interest rates and
the weather. Because of the seasonality of construction, our sales of swimming
pool and commercial lighting products, and thus our overall revenues and income,
have tended to be significantly lower in the first and the third quarter of each
year. Various economic and other trends may alter these seasonal trends from
year to year, and we cannot predict the extent to which these seasonal trends
will continue.
We
are subject to global economic or political conditions which may disrupt the
general economy, reducing demand for our products.
On-going
terrorist threats and actual terrorist attacks have increased the uncertainty in
both the United States and European economy, which are primary markets for our
products, and may negatively impact general economic conditions in those
markets. Economic conditions may also be negatively affected by social unrest,
health epidemics or natural disasters. Because the markets for our products tend
to be highly dependent upon general economic conditions, a decline in general
economic conditions would likely harm our operating results.
If we
are not able to timely and successfully develop, manufacture, market and sell
our new products, our operating results will decline.
We expect
to introduce additional new products in each year in the pool and spa lighting
and/or commercial Lighting markets. Delivery of these products may cause us to
incur additional unexpected research and development expenses. We could have
difficulties manufacturing these new products as a result of our inexperience
with them or the
costs could be higher than expected. Any delays in the introduction of these new
products could result in lost sales, loss of customer confidence and loss of
market share. Also, it
is difficult to predict whether the market will accept these new products. If
any of these new products fails to meet expectations, our operating results will
be adversely affected.
We
operate in markets that are intensely and increasingly
competitive.
Competition
is increasing in a number of our markets. A number of companies offer directly
competitive products, including compact metal halide products for downlighting
and color halogen lighting for swimming pools. We are
also experiencing competition from light emitting diode, or LED, products in
water lighting and in neon and other lighted signs. Our
competitors include some very large and well-established companies such as
Philips, Schott, 3M, Bridgestone, Pentair, Mitsubishi and Osram/Siemens. All of
these companies have substantially greater financial, technical and marketing
resources than we do. We may not be able to adequately respond to fluctuations
in competitive pricing. We anticipate that any future growth in fiber optic
lighting will be accompanied by continuing increases in competition, which could
adversely affect our operating results if we cannot compete
effectively.
We
are involved in what may be costly intellectual property litigation with Pentair
that could harm our competitive position in the swimming pool and spa market and
may prevent us from selling our FX Pool Light product.
We are
currently involved in a lawsuit brought by a larger publi company competitor,
Pentair Water Pool and Spa, Inc., which alleges that the manufacture, use and
sale of our FX Pool Light product infringes three patents that it claims to own.
In the lawsuit, Pentair is attempting to stop us from selling certain of our
synchronized pool light products and to obtain compensatory and treble damages.
This litigation is in its very early stages and we have not as yet filed our
initial responsive pleading. Although we believe we may well have defenses that
are meritorious, litigation is unpredictable and the outcome of this matter
cannot be determined at this time. If we do not prevail, we may be ordered to
pay damages for past sales and an ongoing royalty for future sales of products
found to infringe. Wecould also be ordered to stop selling the challenged FX
Pool Light product. If found liable, we may or may not be able to redesign our
products to avoid future infringement. Any public announcement concerning the
litigation that is unfavorable to us may result in a decline in our stock price.
Additionally, this type of litigation tends to be expensive and protracted, and
our intellectual property position may be weakened as a result of an adverse
ruling. Whether or not we are successful in this lawsuit, this litigation may
consume substantial amounts of our financial resources and divert management’s
attention away from our core business.
We
rely on intellectual property and other proprietary information that may not be
protected and that may be expensive to protect.
We
currently hold 41 patents. There can be no assurance, however, that our
issued patents are valid or that any patents applied for will be issued. We have
a policy of seeking to protect our intellectual property through, among other
things, the prosecution of patents with respect to certain of our technologies.
There are many issued patents and pending patent applications in the field of
fiber optic technology, and certain of our competitors hold and have applied for
patents related to fiber optic and non-fiber optic lighting. As with Pentair, we
have in the past received communications from third parties asserting rights in
our patents or that our technology infringes intellectual property rights held
by such third parties. Based on information currently available to us, we do not
believe that any such claims involving our technology or patents are
meritorious. However, litigation to determine the validity of any third party
claims or claims by us against such third party, whether or not determined in
our favor, could result in significant expense and divert the efforts of our
technical and management personnel, regardless of the outcome of such
litigation. In addition, we do not know whether our competitors will in the
future apply for and obtain patents that will prevent, limit or interfere with
our ability to make, use, sell or import our products. Although we may seek to
resolve any potential future claims or actions, we may not be able to do so on
reasonable terms, or at all. If, following a successful third-party action for
infringement, we cannot obtain a license or redesign our products, we may have
to stop manufacturing and marketing our products, and our business would suffer
as a result.
We
rely on distributors for a significant portion of our sales and terms and
conditions of sales are subject to change with very little
notice.
Most of
our products are sold through distributors, and we do not have long-term
contracts with our distributors. Some of these distributors are quite large,
particularly in the pool products market. If these distributors significantly
change their terms with us or change their historical pattern of ordering
products from us, there could be a significant impact on our net sales and
operating results.
The
loss of a key sales representative could have a negative impact on our net sales
and operating results.
We rely
on key sales representatives and outside sales agents for a significant portion
of our sales. These sales representatives and outside sales agents have unique
relationships with our customers and would be difficult to replace. The loss of
a key sales representative or outside sales agent could interfere with our
ability to maintain customer relationships and result in declines in our net
sales and operating results.
We
depend on key employees in a competitive market for skilled personnel, and the
loss of the services of any of our key employees could materially affect our
business.
Our
future success will depend to a large extent on the continued contributions of
certain employees, many of whom would be difficult to replace. Our future
success will also depend on our ability to attract and retain qualified
technical, sales, marketing and management personnel, for whom competition is
intense. The loss of or failure to attract and retain any such persons could
delay product development cycles, disrupt our operations or otherwise harm our
business or results of operations.
We
depend on a limited number of suppliers from whom we do not have a guarantee to
adequate supplies, increasing the risk that loss of or problems with a single
supplier could result in impaired margins, reduced production volumes, strained
customer relations and loss of business.
Mitsubishi
is the sole supplier of our stranded fiber, which is used extensively in our
fiber pool and spa lighting products. We also rely on a sole source for certain
lamps, reflectors, remote control devices and power supplies. The loss of one or
more of our suppliers could result in delays in the shipment of products,
additional expense associated with redesigning products, impaired margins,
reduced production volumes, strained customer relations and loss of business or
could otherwise harm our results of operations.
We
depend on Advanced Lighting Technologies, Inc., or ADLT, for a number of
components for our products and for certain of our manufacturing
facilities.
ADLT
supplies us with certain lamps, power supplies, reflectors and coatings. We have
identified alternative suppliers for these components, but there could be an
interruption of supply and increased costs if a transition to a new supplier
were required. We could
lose current or prospective customers as a result of supply interruptions.
Increased costs would negatively impact our gross profit margin and results of
operations. We also
lease our facility in Solon, Ohio from ADLT. In the event the ADLT lease is not
renewed in a timely manner, we may experience some disruption of our large core
fiber production while new facilities are found and prepared to support fiber
manufacturing.
We
are becoming increasingly dependent on foreign sources of supply for many of our
components and in some cases complete assemblies, which due to distance or
political events may result in a lack of timely deliveries.
In order
to control costs, we are continually seeking offshore supply of components and
assemblies. This results in longer lead times for deliveries which can mean less
responsiveness to sudden changes in market demand for the products involved.
Some of the countries where components are sourced may be less stable
politically than the United States or may be subject to natural disasters or
diseases, and this could lead to an interruption of the delivery of key
components. Delays in the delivery of key components could result in delays in
product shipments, additional expenses associated with locating alternative
component sources or redesigning products, impaired margins, reduced production
volumes, strained customer relations and loss of customers, any of which could
harm our results of operations.
We
are subject to manufacturing risks, including fluctuations in the costs of
purchased components and raw materials due to market demand, shortages and other
factors.
We depend
on various components and raw materials for use in the manufacturing of our
products. We may not be able to successfully manage price fluctuations due to
market demand or shortages. In addition to risks associated with sole and
foreign suppliers, significant increases in the costs of or sustained
interruptions in our receipt of adequate amounts of necessary components and raw
materials could harm our margins, result in manufacturing halts, harm our
reputation and relationship with our customers and negatively impact our results
of operations.
Our
future success is highly dependent on the successful adoption of Efficient Fiber
Optics, or EFO, products by the lighting market.
EFO is a
new type of lighting that may not achieve acceptance by lighting designers or
other customers of lighting products. EFO products include components that are
difficult to manufacture and/or procure in large quantities in the short term.
These components include lamps and optical and electronic components. While we
plan to increase our manufacturing capabilities to meet an increase in demand,
if the increase is greater than expected or larger quantities are needed in a
shorter time frame than anticipated, we may not be able to meet customers’
requirements and our ability to market the product may be adversely
affected.
We
use plants in Mexico and India to manufacture and assemble many of our products.
The supply of these finished goods may be impacted by local political or social
conditions as well as the financial strength of the companies with which we do
business.
As we
attempt to reduce manufacturing expenses, we are becoming increasingly dependent
upon offshore companies for the manufacturing and final assembly of many of our
products. To do so, we must advance certain raw materials, inventory and
production costs to these off-shore manufacturers. The supply of finished goods
from these companies, and the raw materials, inventory and funds which we
advance to them may be at risk depending upon the varying degrees of stability
of the local political, economic and social environments in which they operate,
and the financial strength of the manufacturing companies
themselves.
Because
we depend on a limited number of significant customers for our net sales, the
loss of a significant customer, reduction in order size, or the effects of
volume discounts granted to significant customers from time to time could harm
our operating results.
Our
business is currently dependent on a limited number of significant customers,
and we anticipate that we will continue to rely on a limited number of
customers. The loss of any significant customer would harm our net sales and
operating results. Customer purchase deferrals, cancellations, reduced order
volumes or non-renewals from any particular customer could cause our quarterly
operating results to fluctuate or decline and harm our business. In addition,
volume discounts granted to significant customers from time to time could lead
to reduced profit margins, and negatively impact our operating
results.
Our
components and products could have design, defects or compatibility issues,
which could be costly to correct and could result in the rejection of our
products and damage to our reputation, as well as lost sales, diverted
development resources and increased warranty reserves and manufacturing
costs.
We cannot
be assured that we will not experience defects or compatibility issues in
components or products in the future. Errors or defects in our products may
arise in the future, and, if significant or perceived to be significant, could
result in rejection of our products, product returns or recalls, damage to our
reputation, lost revenues, diverted development resources and increased customer
service and support costs and warranty claims. Errors or defects in our products
could also result in product liability claims. We estimate warranty and other
returns and accrue reserves for such costs at the time of sale. Any estimates,
reserves or accruals may be insufficient to cover sharp increases in product
returns, and such returns may harm our operating results. In addition, customers
may require design changes in our products in order to suit their needs. Losses,
delays or damage to our reputation due to design or defect issues would likely
harm our business, financial condition and results of operations.
If we
are unable to predict market demand for our products and focus our inventories
and development efforts to meet market demand, we could lose sales opportunities
and experience a decline in sales.
In order
to arrange for the manufacture of sufficient quantities of products and avoid
excess inventory we need to accurately predict market demand for each of our
products. Significant unanticipated fluctuations in demand could cause problems
in our operations. We may not be able to accurately predict market demand in
order to properly allocate our manufacturing and distribution resources among
our products. As a result we may experience declines in sales and lose, or fail
to gain, market share. Conversely, if we overbuild inventories we run a risk of
having inventory write-offs due to obsolescence.
We
depend on collaboration with third parties, who are not subject to material
contractual commitments, to augment our research and development
efforts.
Our
research and development efforts include collaboration with third parties. Many
of these third parties are not bound by any material contractual commitment
leaving them free to end their collaborative efforts at will. Loss of these
collaborative efforts would adversely affect our research and development
efforts and could have a negative effect on our competitive position in the
market. In addition, arrangements for joint development efforts may require us
to make royalty payments on sales of resultant products or enter into licensing
agreements for the technology developed, which could increase our costs and
negatively impact our results of operations.
We
have experienced negative cash flow from operations and may continue to do so in
the future. We may need to raise additional capital in the near future, but our
ability to do so may be limited.
While we
have historically been able to fund cash needs from operations, from bank lines
of credit or from capital markets, due to competitive, economic or other factors
there can be no assurance that we will continue to be able to do so. If our
capital resources are insufficient to satisfy our liquidity requirements and
overall business objectives we may seek to sell additional equity securities or
obtain debt financing. Adverse business conditions due to a weak economic
environment or a weak market for our products have led to and may lead to
continued negative cash flow from operations, which may require us to raise
additional financing, including equity financing. Any equity financing may be
dilutive to shareholders, and debt financing, if available, will increase
expenses and may involve restrictive covenants. We may be required to raise
additional capital, at times and in amounts, which are uncertain, especially
under the current capital market conditions. Under these circumstances, if we
are unable to acquire additional capital or are required to raise it on terms
that are less satisfactory than desired, it may have a material adverse effect
on our financial condition, which could require us to curtail our operations
significantly, sell significant assets, seek arrangements with strategic
partners or other parties that may require us to relinquish significant rights
to products, technologies or markets, or explore other strategic alternatives
including a merger or sale of our company.
Compliance
with changing regulation of corporate governance and public disclosure may
result in additional costs.
Changes
in the laws and regulations affecting public companies, including the provisions
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and new rules and regulations of the
Securities and Exchange Commission and the Nasdaq National Market are creating
new duties and requirements for us and our executives, directors, attorneys and
independent accountants. In order to comply with these new rules, we expect to
continue to incur additional costs for personnel and use additional outside
legal, accounting and advisory services, which we expect will increase our
operating expenses. Management time associated with these compliance efforts
necessarily reduces time available for other operating activities, which could
adversely affect operating results. Estimates of our costs, independent of
additional audit fees, required to comply with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 are in the range of $500,000 or higher. While we expect these costs
to increase our operating expenses significantly, we cannot predict or estimate
the amount of future additional costs we may incur or the timing of such
costs.
We
are exposed to risks from recent legislation requiring companies to evaluate
their internal controls.
Section
404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 will require our management to report on,
and our independent auditors to attest to, the effectiveness of our internal
control structure and procedures for financial reporting. We have an ongoing
program to perform the system and process evaluation and testing necessary to
comply with these requirements. This legislation is relatively new and neither
companies nor accounting firms have significant experience in complying with its
requirements. As a result, we expect to incur increased expense and to devote
additional management resources to Section 404 compliance. In the event that our
chief executive officer, chief financial officer or independent registered
public accounting firm determine that our internal controls over financial
reporting are not effective as defined under Section 404, investor perceptions
of our company may be adversely affected and could cause a decline in the market
price of our stock.
Changes
to financial accounting standards may affect our results of operations and cause
us to change our business practices.
We
prepare our financial statements to conform with generally accepted accounting
principles, or GAAP, in the United States. These accounting principles are
subject to interpretation by the American Institute of Certified Public
Accountants, the Securities and Exchange Commission and various bodies formed to
interpret and create appropriate accounting policies. A change in those policies
can have a significant effect on our reported results and may affect our
reporting of transactions completed before a change is announced. Changes to
those rules or the questioning of current practices may adversely affect our
reported financial results or the way we conduct our business. For example,
accounting policies affecting many aspects of our business, including rules
relating to employee stock option grants, have recently been revised or are
under review. The Financial Accounting Standards Board and other agencies have
finalized changes to U.S. generally accepted accounting principles that will
require us, starting in our third quarter of 2005, to record a charge to
earnings for employee stock option grants and other equity incentives. We may
have significant and ongoing accounting charges resulting from option grant and
other equity incentive expensing that could reduce our overall net income. In
addition, since we historically have used equity-related compensation as a
component of our total employee compensation program, the accounting change
could make the use of equity-related compensation less attractive to us and
therefore make it more difficult to attract and retain employees.
Our
stock price has been and will likely continue to be volatile and you may be
unable to resell your shares at or above the price you paid.
Our stock
price has been and is likely to be highly volatile, particularly due to our
relatively limited trading volume. Our stock price could fluctuate significantly
due to a number of factors, including:
|
• |
variations
in our anticipated or actual operating
results; |
|
• |
sales
of substantial amounts of our stock; |
|
• |
dilution
as a result of additional equity financing by
us; |
|
• |
announcements
about us or about our competitors, including technological innovation or
new products or services; |
|
• |
conditions
in the fiber optic lighting industry; |
|
• |
governmental
regulation and legislation; and |
|
• |
changes
in securities analysts’ estimates of our performance, or our failure to
meet analysts’ expectations. |
Many of
these factors are beyond our control.
In
addition, the stock markets in general, and the Nasdaq National Market and the
market for fiber optic lighting and technology companies in particular, have
experienced extreme price and volume fluctuations recently. These fluctuations
often have been unrelated or disproportionate to the operating performance of
these companies. These broad market and industry factors may adversely affect
the market price of our common stock, regardless of our actual operating
performance.
In the
past, companies that have experienced volatility in the market prices of their
stock have been the object of securities class action litigation. If we were the
object of securities class action litigation, it could result in substantial
costs and a diversion of management’s attention and resources.
Item
3. Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
As of
March 31, 2005, we had $530,000 in cash held in foreign currencies based on the
exchange rates at March 31, 2005. The balances for cash held overseas in foreign
currencies are subject to exchange rate risk. We have a policy of maintaining
cash balances in local currencies unless an amount of cash is occasionally
transferred in order to repay inter-company debts.
As of
March 31, 2005, we had a total borrowing of $447,000 (in Euros, based on the
exchange rate at March 31, 2005) against a credit facility secured by real
property owned by our German subsidiary. As of December 31, 2004, we had
$477,000 (in Euros, based on the exchange rate at December 31, 2004) borrowed
against this credit facility.
Item
4. Controls
and Procedures
(a) Evaluation
of disclosure controls and procedures.
We
maintain “disclosure controls and procedures,” as such term is defined in Rule
13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”), that
are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in
reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed,
summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in Securities and
Exchange Commission rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated
and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding
required disclosure. In designing and evaluating our disclosure controls and
procedures, management recognized that disclosure controls and procedures, no
matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not
absolute, assurance that the objectives of the disclosure controls and
procedures are met. Our disclosure controls and procedures have been designed to
meet, and management believes that they meet, reasonable assurance standards,
subject to the deficiencies and weaknesses identified and discussed under the
sub-heading “Changes in internal controls over financial reporting” at Item 4(b)
below. Additionally, in designing disclosure controls and procedures, our
management necessarily was required to apply its judgment in evaluating the
cost-benefit relationship of possible disclosure controls and procedures. The
design of any disclosure controls and procedures also is based in part upon
certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no
assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all
potential future conditions.
Based on
their evaluation as of the end of the period covered by this Interim Report on
Form 10-Q, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have
concluded that, subject to the limitations noted above and the material weakness
in our internal controls discussed in this Item 4(b) below, our disclosure
controls and procedures were not fully effective to ensure that material
information relating to us, including our consolidated subsidiaries, is made
known to them by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this Interim Report on Form 10-Q was being prepared.
(b) Changes
in internal control over financial reporting.
After
completion of our fourth fiscal quarter for the year ended December 31, 2004 and
in connection with the audit of our consolidated financial statements for that
year, Grant Thornton LLP, our independent registered public accounting firm,
identified and reported to management and the Audit Committee of our Board of
Directors two items it considered in its judgment to be significant deficiencies
in internal controls which aggregate to a material weakness under standards
established by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, or PCAOB.
A control
deficiency exists when the design or operation of a control does not allow
management or employees, in the normal course of performing their assigned
functions, to prevent or detect misstatements on a timely basis. A
significant deficiency is a control deficiency, or combination of control
deficiencies, that adversely affects a company’s ability to initiate, authorize,
record, process, or report external financial data reliably in accordance with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States such that there is
more than a remote likelihood that a misstatement of the entity’s annual or
interim financial statements that is more than inconsequential will not be
prevented or detected. A material weakness is a significant deficiency, or
combination of significant deficiencies, that results in more than a remote
likelihood that a material misstatement of the annual or interim financial
statements will not be prevented or detected.
Grant
Thornton has informed us that they believe that the following two significant
deficiencies constitute a material weakness in our internal controls under
available standards established by the standards of the PCAOB:
1)
|
We
have inadequate segregation of duties in our financial reporting process
and in our information technology governance controls. This means there is
limited opportunity for the exercise of review and monitoring controls
over key reporting and disclosure preparation procedures.
|
2)
|
We
also recorded a number of adjustments to our financial statements during
the course of the audit of the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004, at
least one of which was individually material.
|
These
findings and adjustments constitute significant deficiencies that aggregate to
form a material weakness in our internal controls.
We have
taken and are taking steps to add personnel to augment our financial reporting
processes and to cross-train our existing personnel in order to increase the
segregation of duties. We expect that by adding personnel we will be better able
to record adjustments to our financials on a more timely basis. We also intend
to take measures to acquire additional internal and outside technical accounting
expertise.
We intend
to continue to evaluate these significant deficiencies and to take appropriate
action to correct the internal control deficiencies identified. We further
intend to develop and enhance our internal control policies, procedures, systems
an staff to better allow us to mitigate the risk that material accounting errors
might go undetected and be included in our consolidated financial statements. We
are continuing to review our internal controls as part of our preparation for
the complete phase-in of compliance standards under Section 404 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Any further deficiencies by this review will be
reported to the Audit Committee.
.The
certification of our principal executive officer and principal financial officer
required in accordance with Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 are
attached as exhibits to the Interim Report on Form 10-Q. The disclosure set
forth in this Item 4 contain information concerning (i) the evaluation of our
disclosure controls and procedures, and changes in internal control over
financial reporting, referred to in paragraph 4 of the certifications, and (ii)
material weaknesses in the design or operation of our internal control over
financial reporting, referred to in paragraph 5 of the certifications..
Those
certifications should be read in conjunction with this Item 4 for a more
complete understanding of the matters covered by the
certifications.
PART
II - OTHER INFORMATION
Item
1. Legal
Proceedings
We are a
third-party .defendant
in a lawsuit pending in the Court of Common Pleas, Cuyahoga County, Ohio filed
September 21, 2004. In that matter Sherwin-Williams Company, plaintiff, brought
suit against defendant and third-party plaintiff, Wagner Electric Sign Company,
or Wagner, for alleged breach of warranty and breach of contract in connection
with an allegedly defective sign manufactured and sold by Wagner. The complaint
alleges $141,739.06 in compensatory damages. Third-party plaintiff, Wagner, has
cross-claimed against us requesting unspecified damages alleging that the signs’
failure, if any, arises from defective fiber optic lighting components,
instructions and/or services purportedly supplied to it by us. We deny these
allegations in our responsive pleadings and discovery proceeds on all claims.
While we cannot predict as to the ultimate outcome of the litigation, we do not
currently believe its outcome will have a material impact on our financial
condition.
We are
currently involved in a lawsuit brought by one of our competitors in the
swimming pool and spa market, Pentair Water Pool and Spa, Inc. In a lawsuit
filed against us on April 5, 2005 in the United States District Court, Northern
District of California, Pentair alleges that the manufacture, use and sale of
our FX Pool Light infringes three United States patents that Pentair claims to
own relevant to certain synchronized light technology, U.S. Patent No. 6,379,025
B1, No. 6,002,216 and No. 6,811,286. In the lawsuit, Pentair is attempting to
stop us from selling certain of our synchronized pool light products and to
obtain compensatory and treble damages. Our initial response to these
allegations has not as yet been filed. Although we believe we may well have
defenses that are meritorious, litigation is unpredictable and the outcome of
this matter cannot be determined at this time. If we do not prevail, we may be
ordered to pay damages for past sales and an ongoing royalty for future sales of
products found to infringe. We could also be ordered to stop selling the
challenged FX Pool Light product. If found liable, we may or may not be able to
redesign our products to avoid future infringement. Any public announcement
concerning the litigation that is unfavorable to us may result in a decline in
our stock price.
As the
Pentair litigation is in its very early stages we also do not know how expensive
or protracted it will be. We believe, however, that this type of litigation
often tends to be expensive and protracted. We also believe that our
intellectual property position with regard to synchronized swimming pool and spa
lights may be weakened were the litigation to result in an adverse ruling.
Additionally, whether or not we are successful in this lawsuit, this litigation
could consume substantial amounts of our financial resources and divert
management’s attention away from our core business.
Item
6. Exhibits
and Reports on Form 8-K
|
(a) |
Exhibits |
|
|
|
Exhibit
Number |
|
Description
of Documents |
3.2 |
|
Bylaws
of the Registrant as amended effective April 22, 2005 (composite
copy) |
31.1 |
|
Rule
13a-14(a) Certification of Chief Executive Officer. |
31.2 |
|
Rule
13a-14(a) Certification of Chief Financial Officer. |
32.1** |
|
Statement
of Chief Executive Officer under Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2003 (18 U.S.C. §1350). |
32.2** |
|
Statement
of Chief Financial Officer under Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2003 (18 U.S.C. §1350). |
** In
accordance with item 601(b)(32)(ii) of Regulation S-K and SEC Release Nos.
33-8238 and 34-47986, Final Rule: Management’s Reports on Internal Control Over
Financial Reporting and Certification of Disclosure in Exchange Act Periodic
Reports, the certifications furnished in Exhibits 32.1 and 32.2 hereto are
deemed to accompany this Form 10-Q and will not be deemed "filed" for purposes
of Section 18 of the Exchange Act. Such certifications will not be deemed to be
incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the
Exchange Act, except to the extent that the registrant specifically incorporates
it by reference.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has
duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto
duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
FIBERSTARS,
INC. |
|
|
|
Date:
May 16, 2005 |
By: |
/s/ David
N. Ruckert |
|
David N. Ruckert |
|
Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
|
By: |
/s/ Robert A.
Connors |
|
Robert A. Connors |
|
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial and Accounting
Officer) |
Exhibit
Index
Exhibit
Number |
|
Description
of Documents |
3.2 |
|
Bylaws
of the Registrant as amended effective April 22, 2005 (composite
copy) |
|
|
|
31.1 |
|
Rule
13a-14(a) Certification of Chief Executive Officer. |
|
|
|
31.2 |
|
Rule
13a-14(a) Certification of Chief Financial Officer. |
|
|
|
32.1** |
|
Statement
of Chief Executive Officer under Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2003 (18 U.S.C. §1350). |
|
|
|
32.2** |
|
Statement
of Chief Financial Officer under Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2003 (18 U.S.C. §1350). |
** In
accordance with item 601(b)(32)(ii) of Regulation S-K and SEC Release Nos.
33-8238 and 34-47986, Final Rule: Management’s Reports on Internal Control Over
Financial Reporting and Certification of Disclosure in Exchange Act Periodic
Reports, the certifications furnished in Exhibits 32.1 and 32.2 hereto are
deemed to accompany this Form 10-Q and will not be deemed "filed" for purposes
of Section 18 of the Exchange Act. Such certifications will not be deemed to be
incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the
Exchange Act, except to the extent that the registrant specifically incorporates
it by reference.