Back to GetFilings.com
UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON,
D.C. 20549
FORM
10 Q
x QUARTERLY REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15 (D)
OF
THE
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934.
For the
period ended March 31, 2005
or
o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (D)
OF
THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934.
For the
transition period from __________ to ____________
COMMISSION
FILE NUMBER: 0-18049
StarInvest
Group, Inc.
(Exact
name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Nevada |
|
91-1317131 |
(State
of other jurisdiction of| incorporation or
organization) |
|
(IRS
Employer Identification |
122 East
42nd Street
Suite 2715 New York, NY 10168
(Address
of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
Issuer's
Telephone Number: 212-514-6600
Check
whether the issuer (1) filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 of
15 (d) of the Exchange Act during the past 12 months (or for such shorter period
that the registrant was required to file such report(s), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days YES x NO o.
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule
12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No x.
State the
number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer's classes of common equity,
as the latest practicable date: There were 13,295,957 shares of the Registrant's
common stock issued and outstanding as of May 10, 2005.
StarInvest
Group, Inc.
FORM
10-Q
QUARTERLY
PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 2005
INDEX
Page
PART
I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION |
|
|
|
|
|
Item
1 - Financial Statements |
|
|
|
|
|
Balance
Sheet March 31, 2005 (Unaudited) and December 31, 2004 |
3 |
|
|
|
|
Statements
of Operations (Unaudited) For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2005 and
2004 |
4 |
|
|
|
|
Statements
of Cash Flows (Unaudited) For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2005 and
2004 |
5 |
|
|
|
|
Statement
of Investments (Unaudited) March 31, 2005 |
6 |
|
|
|
|
Notes
to Financial Statements |
7 |
|
|
|
|
Item
2 - Management's Discussion and Analysis or Plan of
Operation |
11 |
|
|
|
|
Item
3 - Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market
Risk |
16 |
|
|
|
|
Item
4 - Controls and Procedures |
17 |
|
|
|
PART
II - OTHER INFORMATION |
|
|
|
|
|
Item
1 - Legal Proceedings |
17 |
|
|
|
|
Item
2 - Changes in Securities and Use of Proceeds |
18 |
|
|
|
|
Item
3 - Default upon Senior Securities |
19 |
|
|
|
|
Item
4 - Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders |
19 |
|
|
|
|
Item
5 - Other Information |
19 |
|
|
|
|
Item
6 - Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K |
20 |
|
|
|
|
Signatures |
21 |
STARINVEST
GROUP, INC. (FORMERLY EXUS GLOBAL, INC.) |
BALANCE
SHEET |
AS
OF MARCH 31, 2005 & DECEMBER 31, 2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
ASSETS |
|
(unaudited) |
|
(audited) |
|
Current
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
Cash |
|
$ |
568,249 |
|
$ |
2,151 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
current assets |
|
|
568,249
|
|
|
2,151
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans
and investments (cost of $1,704,852 & $677,468) |
|
|
1,938,853
|
|
|
911,469
|
|
Other
Assets |
|
|
500
|
|
|
500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
assets |
|
$ |
2,507,602 |
|
$ |
914,120 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES
AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts
payable and accrued expenses |
|
$ |
216,047 |
|
$ |
280,781 |
|
Due
to officer |
|
|
-
|
|
|
175,967
|
|
Loans
payable |
|
|
430,572
|
|
|
492,263
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
current liabilities |
|
|
646,619
|
|
|
949,011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Obligation
to repurchase shares |
|
|
63,000
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders'
equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Series
A preferred stock, no par value; 10,000,000 shares authorized;
10,000 and no shares issued and outstanding |
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Series
B preferred stock, $.001 par value; 10,000,000 shares authorized;
10,000,000 shares issued and outstanding |
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
Common
stock, $.001 par value, 900,000,000 shares authorized; 13,295,958
and 729,290 shares issued and
outstanding, respectively |
|
|
13,296
|
|
|
729
|
|
Additional
paid-in-capital |
|
|
11,912,350
|
|
|
9,674,354
|
|
Stock
subscription receivable |
|
|
(287,500 |
) |
|
-
|
|
Accumulated
deficit |
|
|
(9,850,163 |
) |
|
(9,719,974 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
stockholders' equity (deficit) |
|
|
1,797,983
|
|
|
(34,891 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
liabilities and stockholders' equity |
|
$ |
2,507,602 |
|
$ |
914,120 |
|
Net
asset value per share |
|
$ |
0.08 |
|
$ |
(0.00 |
) |
STARINVEST
GROUP, INC. (FORMERLY EXUS GLOBAL, INC.) |
STATEMENT
OF OPERATIONS |
FOR
THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
(unaudited) |
|
Sales
and service revenues |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost
of sales |
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
profit |
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General
and administrative |
|
|
130,190
|
|
|
183,269
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
expenses |
|
|
130,190
|
|
|
183,269
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss
before other income (expenses) |
|
|
(130,190 |
) |
|
(183,269 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
income (expenses): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
income |
|
|
-
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
Interest
expense, net |
|
|
-
|
|
|
(248,708 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
other income (expenses) |
|
|
-
|
|
|
(228,708 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
loss |
|
$ |
(130,190 |
) |
$ |
(411,977 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss
per common share - basic and fully diluted |
|
$ |
(0.01 |
) |
$ |
(16.02 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
average common shares outstanding basic and fully
diluted |
|
|
14,616,026 |
|
|
25,712
|
|
STARINVEST
GROUP, INC. (FORMERLY EXUS GLOBAL, INC.) |
STATEMENTS
OF CASH FLOWS |
FOR
THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
flows from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
Net
Loss |
|
(130,190) |
|
$
(189,677) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustments
to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating
activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
Net
unrealized (gain) loss in investments |
|
|
-
|
|
|
(222,300 |
) |
Stock
issued for services |
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
Beneficial
conversion |
|
|
-
|
|
|
241,667
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes
in assets and liabilites: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Increase)
decrease in assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
assets |
|
|
-
|
|
|
12,850
|
|
Increase
(decrease) in liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts
payable and accrued expenses |
|
|
(64,734 |
) |
|
(72,828 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
adjustments |
|
|
(64,734 |
) |
|
(40,611 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
cash used in operating activities |
|
|
(194,924 |
) |
|
(230,288 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
flows used by investing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
paid for investments |
|
|
(1,065,474 |
) |
|
(123,420 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
flows from financing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds
from convertible and portfolio loans |
|
|
38,090
|
|
|
325,000
|
|
Proceeds
from (repayments of) notes payable |
|
|
(61,691 |
) |
|
-
|
|
Proceeds
from subscription receivable |
|
|
-
|
|
|
14,750
|
|
Proceeds
from (repayments of) officer loan |
|
|
(175,967 |
) |
|
14,598
|
|
Obligation
to repurchase shares |
|
|
105,000
|
|
|
-
|
|
Proceeds
from issuance of common stock |
|
|
1,921,064
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
cash provided by financing activities |
|
|
1,826,496
|
|
|
354,348
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
increase (decrease) in cash |
|
|
566,098
|
|
|
640
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash,
beginning of period |
|
|
2,151
|
|
|
812
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash,
end of period |
|
|
568,249
|
|
|
1,452
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental
disclosure of cash flow information: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
15,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income
taxes |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NON-CASH
INVESTING AND FINANCING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common
stock issued for future services |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common
stock issued for debts |
|
$ |
79,814 |
|
$ |
118,295 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred
stock issued for debt |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
- |
|
StarInvest
Group, Inc |
Schedule
of Investments |
|
March
31, 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Company |
|
Cost |
|
Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AGI
Partners, Ltd |
Private |
200,000 |
|
200,000 |
|
Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New
Life Scientific Inc |
Public
NWLF |
105,000 |
|
339,000 |
Note
1 |
Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maxplanet
Corp |
Public
MXNT |
206,750 |
|
206,750 |
|
Equity
& Loan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
E
Education Network, Inc |
Private |
50,000 |
|
50,000 |
|
Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Food
products, Inc |
Private |
10,814 |
|
10,814 |
|
Loan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GoIP
Global, Inc |
Private |
52,288 |
|
52,288 |
|
Loan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amazon
Biotech Inc |
Public
AMZB |
15,000 |
|
15,000 |
|
Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wireless
Ink, LLC |
Private |
50,000 |
|
50,000 |
|
Loan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Magnetech,
Corp. |
Private |
800,000 |
|
800,000 |
|
Loan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SecureX
LLC |
Private |
115,000 |
|
115,000 |
|
Equity
& Loan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asia
payment System |
Public
APYM |
100,000 |
|
100,000 |
|
Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$1,704,852 |
|
$1,938,852 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note
1: Publicly traded security - Price based on 161,429 shares at 2.75 per
share less 20% due to
restricted shares. |
Notes to
the Financial Statements
March 31,
2005
NOTE
1 - ORGANIZATION AND BASIS OF PRESENTATION
The
accompanying financial statements have been prepared by the Company without
audit. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (which include only normal
recurring adjustments) necessary to present fairly the financial position as of
March 31, 2005, and the results of operations and cash flows for all periods
presented have been made.
Certain
information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements
prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America have been condensed or omitted. These financial
statements should be read in conjunction with the audited financial statements
and related notes and schedules included in the Company's 2004 Annual Report
filed on Form 10-K dated December 31, 2004. The results of operations for the
periods ended March 31, 2005 and 2004 are not necessarily indicative of the
operating results for the full years.
StarInvest
Group, Inc. (“STIV” or the “Company”) is a specialty investment company
principally providing capital to small- and medium-sized technology companies.
The Company intends to focus its portfolio in the following technology sectors:
software, Internet, IT services, media, telecommunications, semiconductors,
hardware and technology-enabled services. As of March 31, 2005, we have
invested approximately $1.9 million in 11 portfolio companies. Our investment
objective is to maximize the portfolio's total return by investing in the debt
and/or equity securities of technology-related companies. We also seek to
provide our stockholders with current income on investments in debt securities
and long-term capital growth through the appreciation in the value of warrants
or other equity instruments that we may receive when we make debt or equity
investments.
NOTE
2 - INVESTMENTS
During
the period from our initial election in March 2004 through March 31, 2005, the
Company has made eleven investments in target companies that total approximately
$1.9 million in funded capital. We have completed the following
transactions since our election to be a Business Development Company:
Portfolio
Company |
|
Date |
|
Investment |
|
Cost |
E
Education Network, Inc. |
|
January
2004 |
|
Common
stock |
|
50,000 |
AGI
Partners, Ltd. |
|
January
2004 |
|
Common
stock |
|
200,000 |
MaxPlanet
Corp. |
|
March
2004 |
|
Common
stock
Senior
secured note |
|
200,000
6,750 |
Food
Products, Inc. |
|
September
2004 |
|
Senior
secured note |
|
10,814 |
Wireless
Ink LLC |
|
June
2004 |
|
Senior
secured note |
|
50,000 |
Amazon
Biotech Inc. |
|
October
2004 |
|
Common
stock |
|
15,000 |
GoIP
Global Inc. |
|
December
2004 |
|
Senior
secured note |
|
52,288 |
Magnetech
Inc. |
|
March
2005 |
|
Senior
secured note |
|
800,000 |
Secure
X LLC |
|
March
2005 |
|
Senior
secured note
Membership
Interest |
|
25,000
90,000 |
New
Life Scientific Inc |
|
September
2004 |
|
Common
stock |
|
339,000 |
Asia
Payment Systems, Inc. |
|
March
2005 |
|
Common
stock |
|
100,000 |
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
1,938,852 |
We
currently have evaluating several companies in which we may decide to invest.
However, there can be no assurance or certainty when or if these transactions
will close.
As
required by ASR 118, the investment committee of the company is required to
assign a fair value to all investments. To comply with Section 2(a) (41) of the
Investment Company Act and Rule 2a-4 under the Investment Company Act, it is
incumbent upon the board of directors to satisfy themselves that all appropriate
factors relevant to the value of securities for which market quotations are not
readily available have been considered and to determine the method of arriving
at the fair value of each such security. To the extent considered necessary, the
board may appoint persons to assist them in the determination of such value, and
to make the actual calculations pursuant to the board's direction. The board
must also, consistent with this responsibility, continuously review the
appropriateness of the method used in valuing each issue of security in the
company's portfolio. The directors must recognize their responsibilities in this
matter and whenever technical assistance is requested from individuals who are
not directors, the findings of such intervals must be carefully reviewed by the
directors in order to satisfy themselves that the resulting valuations are fair.
No single
standard for determining "fair value...in good faith" can be laid down, since
fair value depends upon the circumstances of each individual case. As a general
principle, the current "fair value" of an issue of securities being valued by
the board of directors would appear to be the amount which the owner might
reasonably expect to receive for them upon their current sale. Methods which are
in accord with this principle may, for example, be based on a multiple of
earnings, or a discount from market of a similar freely traded security, or
yield to maturity with respect to debt issues, or a combination of these and
other methods. Some of the general factors which the directors should consider
in determining a valuation method for an individual issue of securities include:
1) the
fundamental analytical data relating to the investment,
2) the
nature and duration of restrictions on disposition of the securities, and
3) an
evaluation of the forces which influence the market in which these securities
are purchased and sold. Among the more specific factors which are to be
considered are: type of security, financial statements, cost at date of
purchase, size of holding, discount from market value of unrestricted securities
of the same class at time of purchase, special reports prepared by analysis,
information as to any transactions or offers with respect to the security,
existence of merger proposals or tender offers affecting the securities, price
and extent of public trading in similar securities of the issuer or comparable
companies, and other relevant matters.
The board
has arrived at the following valuation method for its investments. Where there
is not a readily available source for determining the market value of any
investment, either because the investment is not publicly traded, or is thinly
traded, and in absence of a recent appraisal, the value of the investment shall
be based on the following criteria:
1. Total
amount of the Company's actual investment ("AI"). This amount shall include all
loans, purchase price of securities, and fair value of securities given at the
time of exchange.
2. Total
revenues for the preceding twelve months ("R").
3.
Earnings before interest, taxes and depreciation ("EBITD")
4.
Estimate of likely sale price of investment ("ESP")
5. Net
assets of investment ("NA")
6.
Likelihood of investment generating positive returns (going concern).
The
estimated value of each investment shall be determined as follows:
o Where
no or limited revenues or earnings are present, then the value shall be the
greater of the investment's a) net assets, b) estimated sales price, or c) total
amount of actual investment.
o Where
revenues and/or earnings are present, then the value shall be the greater of one
time (1x) revenues or three times (3x) earnings, plus the greater of the net
assets of the investment or the total amount of the actual investment.
o Under
both scenarios, the value of the investment shall be adjusted down if there is a
reasonable expectation that the Company will not be able to recoup the
investment or if
The
Company has not retained independent appraisers to assist in the valuation of
the portfolio investments because the cost was determined to be prohibitive for
the current levels of investments.
NOTE
3 - EQUITY TRANSACTIONS
In
January 2005, the Company effected a 1 for 200 reverse stock split. All share
and per share amounts have been retroactively adjusted to reflect the effect of
the above splits.
In
January 2005 the Company sold 100,000 shares of the Company’s Common stock as
per their REG E Offering Circular for $15,000. In addition issued 100,000 shares
of the Company’s Common stock, which was sold for $15,000 and was paid for in
December 2004.
In
February 2005, the Company sold 2,000,000 shares of the Company’s Common stock
as per their REG E Offering Circular for $300,000.
In March
2005, the Company sold 10,156,668 shares of the Company’s Common stock as per
their REG E Offering Circular for $1,918,750.
In March
2005, the Company issued 210,000 shares of the Company’s Common stock as per
their REG E offering Circular to 2 debt holders canceling $26,000 in
debt.
NOTE
4 - LOANS PAYABLE
Naum
Melamed |
|
$ |
65,000 |
|
|
Paid
in April 2005 |
|
Kentan
Ltd (2) |
|
|
104,125 |
|
|
$25,000
Paid in April 2005 |
|
Oyen(1) |
|
|
58,947 |
|
|
Due
June 2005 |
|
New
Canaan Partners, Ltd (3) |
|
|
202,500 |
|
|
Due
March 31, 2005 |
|
Total |
|
$ |
430,572 |
|
|
|
|
(1) A
note in the principal amount of $50,000 was due in September 2001. The note
bears interest at 24% per annum and is currently in default. Interest and
Penalties have been accrued. In September, the Company defaulted on an
agreed monthly repayment plan. Based on the settlement agreement, the Creditor
has the right to file a Confession of Judgment against the company and Isaac
Sutton its CEO. In March 2005 the Company paid $10,000 and received a 90 day
moratorium on the judgment.
(2)The
Company has agreed to a repayment schedule for an outstanding note to Kentan
Ltd. Original notes were for $125,000. $25,000 was paid in April 2005 with
the balance paid in equal quarterly payments.
(3) Notes
in the principal amount of $500,000 were due to New Canaan Partners, Ltd a
company which is controlled by certain shareholders of StarInvest Group, Inc.
The notes were due on various dates through July 2003, and bore interest at 15%
per annum. The notes were collateralized by all of the assets of the Company. On
December 31, 2002, the Company issued 238,095 restricted common shares to the
note holders in consideration of converting debt in the amount of $325,540 and
accrued interest through December 31, 2002 of $52,996. The shares issued have
been valued at their fair market value of $.01 on the date of issuance. The
remaining balance of $187,500 is payable on December 31, 2004 with interest of
8% per annum payable each December 31. At December 31, 2004, accrued interest
related to this note amounted to $15,000 and is included in the loan payable
amount. This note has been extended and is payable March 31, 2005.
NOTE
5 - SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
On April
7, 2005, Larry O’ Donnell was engaged as the new principal independent auditors
for StarInvest Group, Inc.
ITEM
2. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF RESULTS OF OPERATIONS AND FINANCIAL
CONDITION
GENERAL
The
statements contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q that are not
historical facts may contain forward-looking statements that involve a number of
known and unknown risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to
differ materially from those discussed or anticipated by management. Potential
risks and uncertainties include, among other factors, general business
conditions, government regulations, manufacturing practices, competitive market
conditions, success of the Company's business strategy, delay of orders, changes
in the mix of products sold, availability of suppliers, concentration of sales
in markets and to certain customers, changes in manufacturing efficiencies,
development and introduction of new products, fluctuations in margins, timing of
significant orders, and other risks and uncertainties currently unknown to
management.
CRITICAL
ACCOUNTING POLICIES
The
Company's financial statements and related public financial information are
based on the application of accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America ("GAAP"). GAAP requires the use of estimates;
assumptions, judgments and subjective interpretations of accounting principles
that have an impact on the assets, liabilities, revenue and expense amounts
reported. These estimates can also affect supplemental information contained in
the external disclosures of the Company including information regarding
contingencies, risk and financial condition. We believe our use of estimates and
underlying accounting assumptions adhere to GAAP and are consistently and
conservatively applied. Valuations based on estimates are reviewed by us for
reasonableness and conservatism on a consistent basis throughout the Company.
Primary areas where financial information of the Company is subject to the use
of estimates, assumptions and the application of judgment include acquisitions,
valuation of investments, and the realizability of deferred tax assets. We base
our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that we
believe to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results may differ
materially from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.
VALUATION
OF LONG-LIVED AND INTANGIBLE ASSETS
The
recoverability of long-lived assets requires considerable judgment and is
evaluated on an annual basis or more frequently if events or circumstances
indicate that the assets may be impaired. As it relates to definite life
intangible assets, we apply the impairment rules as required by SFAS No. 121,
"Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and Assets to Be Disposed
Of" as amended by SFAS No. 144, which also requires significant judgment and
assumptions related to the expected future cash flows attributable to the
intangible asset. The impact of modifying any of these assumptions can have a
significant impact on the estimate of fair value and, thus, the recoverability
of the asset.
INCOME
TAXES
We
recognize deferred tax assets and liabilities based on the differences between
the financial statement carrying amounts and the tax bases of assets and
liabilities. We regularly review our deferred tax assets for recoverability and
establish a valuation allowance based upon historical losses, projected future
taxable income and the expected timing of the reversals of existing temporary
differences. As of March 31, 2005, we estimated the allowance on net deferred
tax assets to be one hundred percent of the net deferred tax assets.
VALUATION
OF INVESTMENTS
As
required by ASR 118, the investment committee of the company is required to
assign a fair value to all investments. To comply with Section 2(a) (41) of the
Investment Company Act and Rule 2a-4 under the Investment Company Act, it is
incumbent upon the board of directors to satisfy themselves that all appropriate
factors relevant to the value of securities for which market quotations are not
readily available have been considered and to determine the method of arriving
at the fair value of each such security. To the extent considered necessary, the
board may appoint persons to assist them in the determination of such value, and
to make the actual calculations pursuant to the board's direction. The board
must also, consistent with this responsibility, continuously review the
appropriateness of the method used in valuing each issue of security in the
company's portfolio. The directors must recognize their responsibilities in this
matter and whenever technical assistance is requested from individuals who are
not directors, the findings of such intervals must be carefully reviewed by the
directors in order to satisfy themselves that the resulting valuations are fair.
No single
standard for determining "fair value...in good faith" can be laid down, since
fair value depends upon the circumstances of each individual case. As a general
principle, the current "fair value" of an issue of securities being valued by
the board of directors would appear to be the amount which the owner might
reasonably expect to receive for them upon their current sale. Methods which are
in accord with this principle may, for example, be based on a multiple of
earnings, or a discount from market of a similar freely traded security, or
yield to maturity with respect to debt issues, or a combination of these and
other methods. Some of the general factors which the directors should consider
in determining a valuation method for an individual issue of securities include:
1) the
fundamental analytical data relating to the investment, 2) the nature and
duration of restrictions on disposition of the securities, and 3) an evaluation
of the forces which influence the market in which these securities are purchased
and sold. Among the more specific factors which are to be considered are: type
of security, financial statements, cost at date of purchase, size of holding,
discount from market value of unrestricted securities of the same class at time
of purchase, special reports prepared by analysis, information as to any
transactions or offers with respect to the security, existence of merger
proposals or tender offers affecting the securities, price and extent of public
trading in similar securities of the issuer or comparable companies, and other
relevant matters.
The board
has arrived at the following valuation method for its investments. Where there
is not a readily available source for determining the market value of any
investment, either because the investment is not publicly traded, or is thinly
traded, and in absence of a recent appraisal, the value of the investment shall
be based on the following criteria:
1. Total
amount of the Company's actual investment ("AI"). This amount shall include all
loans, purchase price of securities, and fair value of securities given at the
time of exchange.
2. Total
revenues for the preceding twelve months ("R").
3.
Earnings before interest, taxes and depreciation ("EBITD")
4.
Estimate of likely sale price of investment ("ESP")
5. Net
assets of investment ("NA")
6.
Likelihood of investment generating positive returns (going concern).
The
estimated value of each investment shall be determined as follows:
o Where
no or limited revenues or earnings are present, then the value shall be the
greater of the investment's a) net assets, b) estimated sales price, or c) total
amount of actual investment.
o Where
revenues and/or earnings are present, then the value shall be the greater of one
time (1x) revenues or three times (3x) earnings, plus the greater of the net
assets of the investment or the total amount of the actual investment.
o Under
both scenarios, the value of the investment shall be adjusted down if there is a
reasonable expectation that the Company will not be able to recoup the
investment or if there is reasonable doubt about the investments ability to
continue as a going concern.
The
Company has not retained independent appraises to assist in the valuation of the
portfolio investments because the cost was determined to be prohibitive for the
current levels of investments.
COMPANY
STRATEGY
StarInvest
Group, Inc. (“STIV” or the “Company”) is a specialty investment company
principally providing capital to small- and medium-sized technology companies.
The Company intends to focus its portfolio in the following technology sectors:
software, Internet, IT services, media, telecommunications, semiconductors,
hardware and technology-enabled services. As of December 31, 2004 and
March 31, 2005, we had invested approximately $911,000 in 8 portfolio companies,
and approximately $1.9 million in 11 portfolio companies, respectively. Our
investment objective is to maximize our portfolio's total return by investing in
the debt and/or equity securities of technology-related companies. We also seek
to provide our stockholders with current income on investments in debt
securities and long-term capital growth through the appreciation in the value of
warrants or other equity instruments that we may receive when we make debt
investments or equity investments.
Our
capital is generally invested into our portfolio companies where it is used to
finance organic growth, acquisitions, recapitalizations and working capital. Our
investment decisions are based on analysis of potential portfolio companies'
business operations supported by an in-depth understanding of the quality of
their recurring revenues and cash flow, variability of costs and the inherent
value of their assets, including proprietary intangible assets and intellectual
property.
We were
founded in September 1985 as Gemini Energy Corporation under the laws of the
State of Nevada. On January 28, 1994, the Company's name was changed to Nerox
Energy Corporation. On April 24, 1998 the Company's name was changed to Nerox
Holding Corporation. On December 15, 1998 the Company's name was changed to
E*twoMedia.com. As of August 31, 1999, we acquired all of the issued and
outstanding shares of common stock of Free Publishing Services Limited.
Operations ceased in the fourth quarter of 2000, and we became inactive pursuant
to a share purchase agreement with Mintcanyon Business Ltd., entered into on
December 29, 2000. We sold all our shares in Free Publishing Services Ltd. in
exchange for the assumption of specified assets and liabilities. On December 19,
2000 our name was changed to Exus Networks, Inc. Pursuant to an Agreement and
Plan of Reorganization (the "Exchange Agreement") dated January 15, 2001 between
the Company and the shareholders of Exus Networks, Inc., a New York corporation
("Exus"), Isaac H. Sutton became the majority stockholder and our sole director.
Upon consummation of the Exchange Agreement, the Company acquired all of Exus'
common stock and the shareholders of Exus received 20,000,000 shares of the
Company's common stock. On April 10, 2003 the Company's name was changed to Exus
Global, Inc. During 2003 Exus Global was in the process of a complete
reorganization, changing its core business from mobile satellite communication
to that of a holding company. On March 9, 2004, we filed Form N-54A to elect to
be regulated as a business development company under the Investment Company Act
of 1940. The Company's status as a business development company can only be
changed by a vote of the Company's shareholders.
We are a
Nevada corporation and a closed-end, non-diversified management investment
company that has elected to be regulated as a business development company under
the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”). As a business
development company, we are required to meet regulatory tests, including the
requirement to invest at least 70% of our total assets in eligible portfolio
companies. In addition, we have elected to be treated for federal income tax
purposes as a regulated investment company, or RIC, under the Internal Revenue
Code of 1986 (the “Code”).
While we
intend to concentrate our investments in technology-related sectors, we may seek
other investment opportunities outside these sectors and may also have up to 30%
of our assets invested in non-eligible investments. Our headquarters are
at 122 East 42nd Street
Suite 2715 New York, New York 10168 and our telephone number is (212) 514-6600.
RESULTS
OF OPERATIONS
QUARTER
ENDED MARCH 31, 2005 COMPARED TO QUARTER ENDED MARCH 31, 2004
During
the quarter ended March 31, 2005, the Company had $130,190 in net loss from
operations, compared to $189,677 loss in operations during the same quarter of
2004. The net decrease in net assets in 2005 resulted from operating expenses
required to run the company.
Operating
expenses were $130,190 and $183,269 for the quarters ended March 31, 2005 and
2004, respectively.
Operating
expenses in the quarter ended March 31, 2005 included approximately $31,800 in
"Professional Fees" which included accounting, legal and consulting fees.
Additionally, interest expense for the quarter ended March 31, 2005 was $0
compared to $248,708 for the quarter ended March 31, 2004. The decrease is
attributed to the recording of interest in 2004 related to the beneficial
conversion feature of the convertible debentures versus no interest expense in
2005.
LIQUIDITY
AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
The
accompanying financial statements have been prepared in conformity with
principles of accounting applicable to a going concern, which contemplates the
realization of assets and the satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course
of business. The Company had a net decrease in net assets from operations of
$(130,190) and has incurred operating losses from inception and has an
accumulated deficit of $(9,850,163). The Company requires additional capital to
meet its operating requirements. Management plans to increase cash flows through
the sale of securities (see following paragraph below) and, through it's on
going profitable operations. There are no assurances that such plans will be
successful. No adjustments have been made to the accompanying financial
statements as a result of this uncertainty.
For the
three months ended March 31, 2005, the Company used cash in operating activities
of $194,924 compared to $230,288 for the three months ended March 31, 2004.
For the
three months ended March 31, 2005, we used cash for the purpose of investing in
our portfolio companies of $1,065,474.
For the
three months ended March 31, 2005, net cash provided by financing activities was
$1,826,496 as compared to net cash provided by financing activities of $354,348
for the three months ended March 31, 2004. During the three months ended March
31, 2005, we received proceeds from the issuance of stock totaling $1,921,064.
On March
9, 2004, the Company filed a notification with the Commission of its intent to
raise capital through the issuance of securities exempt from registration under
Regulation E of the Securities Act of 1933. This exemption allows the Company to
sell up to $5,000,000 of securities exempt from registration. Through the end of
March 2005, the Company raised $3,134,326 through the sale of 12,827,194 shares
of common stock through the use of the Regulation E exemption.
There is
no assurance that the Company will be able to raise any additional funds through
the issuance of the remaining convertible debentures or that any funds made
available will be adequate for the Company to continue as a going concern.
Further, if the Company is not able to generate positive cash flow from
operations, or is unable to secure adequate funding under acceptable terms,
there is substantial doubt that the company can continue as a going concern.
ITEM
3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
We have
invested in small and medium-sized companies, and our investments are considered
speculative in nature. Our investments often include securities that are subject
to legal or contractual restrictions on resale that adversely affect the
liquidity and marketability of such securities. As a result, we are subject to
risk of loss which may prevent our stockholders from achieving price
appreciation and dividend distributions. The portion of our portfolio consisting
of investments in private companies is also subject to valuation risk. We value
our privately held investments based on a determination of their fair value made
in good faith by our board of directors on a quarterly basis in accordance with
our established guidelines. In the absence of a readily ascertainable market
value, the estimated values of our investments may differ significantly from the
values that would exist if a ready market for these securities existed. Any
changes in valuation are recorded in our statements of operations as "Net
unrealized gain (loss) on investments."
We
consider the management of equity price risk essential to conducting our
business and maintaining our profitability. Our portfolio consists of
investments in private companies. We anticipate no impact on these investments
from modest changes in public market equity prices. However, should significant
changes in market prices occur, there could be a long-term effect on valuations
of private companies, which could affect the carrying value and the amount and
timing of gains realized on these investments. This could also affect our
ability to generate cash through the sale of private equity investments, since
there may not be realistic initial public offering opportunities.
ITEM
4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
(a) As of
the end of the period covered by this quarterly report on Form 10-Q, the
Company's chief executive officer and chief financial officer conducted an
evaluation of the Company's disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Rules 13a-15 and 15d-15 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934). Based upon this
evaluation, the Company's chief executive officer and chief financial officer
concluded that the Company's disclosure controls and procedures are effective in
timely alerting them of any material information relating to the Company that is
required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports it files or submits under
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. (b) There have not been any significant
changes in the Company's internal control over financial reporting that occurred
during our most recently completed fiscal quarter that have materially affected,
or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company's internal control
over financial reporting.
PART
II. OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM
1. Legal Proceedings
Farsedakis
vs. the Company has received a default judgment by an ex consultant for services
performed for $71,414.55. The default judgment was based upon a breach of
contract claim between the Plaintiff and the Company. The Company is
moving to reopen the case and plans on defending the action. The judgment has
been accrued in the financial statements.
In
October 2004, the Company and its Directors were served with documents naming
the Company as defendants with a $40,000 default judgment for not answering an
information subpoena, regarding Isaac Sutton its CEO. The Company intends to
take the appropriate legal action to dismiss the judgment and provide the
information requested if it is available.
On
February 18, 2004, William Oyen and Carolyn Oyen filed a lawsuit entitled
"William Oyen and Carolyn Oyen v. Exus Global Networks f/k/a Exus Networks, Inc.
and Isaac Sutton". United States District Court Southern District of New York
case no. 04-CV-01327, against the Company and Isaac Sutton, for failure to pay a
promissory note of $50,000, personally guaranteed by Isaac Sutton. A settlement
was reached whereby the Company enter into a monthly payment plan and issued a
confession of Judgment in the event of default, In September 2004, the Company
defaulted on an agreed monthly repayment of a $53,000 note. Based on the prior
settlement agreement the Creditor has the right to file a Confession of Judgment
against the Company and Isaac Sutton its CEO. In March 2005 the Company paid
$10,000 and received a 90 day moratorium on the judgment.
Kentan
Limited Corporation, a holder of a convertible note for $125,000 began
litigation for payment, the case was settled on April 5, 2005 in the Southern
District of New York, whereby the company agreed to a confession of judgment and
is required to pay $25,000 quarterly until the debit is paid. In April 2005 the
company paid $25,000. All conversion rights have been cancelled. The stipulation
settling the action contains the usual and customary clauses such as notice and
cure provisions, default provisions and the issuance of releases upon
satisfactory fulfillment of the terms of the stipulation of
settlement.
The
Company knows of no material legal proceedings pending or threatened, or
judgments entered against any of its Directors or Officers in their capacity as
such.
ITEM
2. Changes in Securities
On
January 3, 2005, our Board of Directors voted to authorize and recommend that
our shareholders approve the Amendment to effect the Reverse Stock Split and
change our name. Also on January 3, 2005, shareholders representing a majority
of the shares of our Common Stock outstanding consented in writing to the
Amendment.
The terms
of the Reverse Stock Split provide for each two hundred (200) of the outstanding
shares of our Common Stock on the date of the Reverse Stock Split (the "Old
Shares") will be automatically converted into one (1) share of our Common Stock
(the "New Shares"), thereby reducing the number of shares of our Common Stock
issued and outstanding.
The
Amendment does not change the par value designation of our Common Stock, or the
number of shares of our Common Stock authorized for issuance.
In
January 2005 the Company sold 100,000 shares of the Company’s Common stock as
per their REG E Offering Circular for $15,000. In addition issued 100,000 shares
of the Company’s Common stock, which was sold for $15,000 and was paid for in
December 2004.
In
February 2005, the Company sold 2,000,000 shares of the Company’s Common stock
as per their REG E Offering Circular for $300,000.
In March
2005, the Company sold 10,156,668 shares of the Company’s Common stock as per
their REG E Offering Circular for $1,918,750.
In March
2005, the Company issued 210,000 shares of the Company’s Common stock as per
their REG E offering Circular to 2 debit holders canceling $26,000 in
debit.
ITEM
3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities
None
ITEM
4. Submission of Matters to Vote of Security Holders
This
Information Statement was mailed or otherwise furnished to shareholders of EXUS
GLOBAL, INC., a Nevada corporation (the "Company"), on or about January 25,
2005, in connection with a certain shareholder action taken by written consent
of the holders of a majority of our outstanding shares of Common Stock to
approve an amendment to our Articles of Incorporation, as amended (the
"Amendment"). The purpose of the Amendment is to (i) effect a reverse split (the
"Reverse Stock Split") of our issued and outstanding Common Stock, $.001 par
value per share (the "Common Stock") pursuant to which each two hundred (200)
shares of our issued and outstanding Common Stock as of the record date of the
Reverse Stock Split was combined and consolidated into one (1) share of Common
Stock immediately following the Reverse Stock Split; and (ii) change the name of
our Company from Exus Global, Inc. to "StarInvest Group, Inc."
ITEM
5. Other Information
On April
7, 2005, Larry O Donnell was engaged as the new principal independent
accountants for StarInvest Group, Inc.
ITEM
6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K
|
(a)
Exhibits |
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
No. |
Description |
|
|
|
|
31.1 |
Certification
by Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 |
|
|
|
|
31.2 |
Certification
by Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 |
|
|
|
|
32.1 |
Certification
by Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 906 |
|
|
|
|
32.2 |
Certification
by Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 906 |
|
|
(b)
Reports on Form 8-K |
An
Amended 8K was filed in April 2005, as an amendment to the initial filing of
this Form 8-K that was filed by StarInvest Group, Inc. (the “Company”) on
December 30, 2004. The initial filing disclosed that HJ & Associates, LLC
informed the Company that it would resign as the Company’s independent
registered public accounting firm. The purpose of this amendment is to update
the disclosures contained in Item 4.01 regarding the appointment of a new
independent accountant. Effective December 30, 2004, the firm of HJ and
Associates, LLC ("HJ"), our independent accountant during the period from May
24, 2004 to December 30, 2004, resigned. On April 7, 2005, the Company engaged
Larry O’Donnell, Certified Public Accountant, ("O’Donnell") as our new
independent accountant for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004.
SIGNATURE
PAGE
In
accordance with the requirements of the Exchange Act, the registrant caused this
report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
Date: May 10, 2005 |
By: |
/s/ Isaac H
Sutton |
|
Isaac H Sutton |
|
Chief Executive
Officer |