Back to GetFilings.com








SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549


FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

X Quarterly Report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2005; or
__ Transition report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 for the transition period from _______ to _______.

Commission File Number 0-18754
-------

BLACK WARRIOR WIRELINE CORP.
------------------------------------------------------
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

DELAWARE 11-2904094
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. employer
incorporation of organization) identification no.)

100 ROSECREST LANE, COLUMBUS, MISSISSIPPI 39701
-----------------------------------------------
(Address of principal executive offices, zip code)

(662) 329-1047
------------------------------------------------
(Issuer's Telephone Number, Including Area Code)


Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports
required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the issuer
was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past 90 days.

YES X NO
------------- -------------

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer
(as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes |_| No |X|

APPLICABLE ONLY TO CORPORATE ISSUERS:

As of May 5, 2005, 12,499,528 shares of the Registrant's Common Stock,
$.0005 par value, were outstanding.










BLACK WARRIOR WIRELINE CORP.

QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q

INDEX


PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Page
------

Item 1. Financial Statements

Condensed Balance Sheets - March 31, 2005 (unaudited)
and December 31, 2004 3

Condensed Statements of Operations -
Three Months Ended March 31, 2005 (unaudited) and
March 31, 2004 (unaudited) 4

Condensed Statements of Cash Flows -
Three Months Ended March 31, 2005 (unaudited) and
March 31, 2004 (unaudited) 5

Notes to Condensed Financial Statements -
Three Months ended March 31, 2005 (unaudited) and
March 31, 2004 (unaudited) 6

Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations 13

Item 3. Qualitative and Quantitative Disclosures About Market Risk 21

Item 4. Controls and Procedures 22


PART II - OTHER INFORMATION


Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K 23



2




PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

BLACK WARRIOR WIRELINE CORP.
CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS


MARCH 31, DECEMBER 31,
2005 2004
(UNAUDITED)
ASSETS

Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents $ 1,620,827 $ 2,647,980
Restricted cash 934,144 --
Accounts receivable, less allowance of $468,528 and $475,449, respectively 9,087,356 8,330,618
Other receivables 326,860 216,195
Prepaid expenses 2,374,613 3,030,040
Other current assets 1,601,649 1,440,483
------------ ------------

Total current assets 15,945,449 15,665,316

Property, plant and equipment, less accumulated depreciation 13,740,744 12,978,670
Other assets 378,171 227,828
Goodwill 1,237,416 1,237,416
------------ ------------


Total assets $ 31,301,780 $ 30,109,230
------------ ------------

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT

Current liabilities:
Accounts payable $ 2,211,855 $ 2,056,832
Accrued salaries and vacation 1,280,431 840,537
Other accrued expenses 687,521 1,683,541
Accrued interest payable 8,253 51,789
Current maturities of long-term debt 4,675,281 4,156,770
------------ ------------

Total current liabilities 8,863,341 8,789,469

Long-term debt, less current maturities 6,003,066 6,393,281
Non current accrued interest payable to related parties 17,995,328 17,132,739
Notes payable to related parties 23,002,375 23,002,375
------------ ------------

Total liabilities 55,864,110 55,317,864
------------ ------------

Stockholders' deficit:
Preferred stock, $.0005 par value, 2,500,000 shares authorized,
none issued at March 31, 2005 or December 31, 2004 -- --
Common stock, $.0005 par value, 175,000,000 shares authorized,
12,504,148 shares issued and outstanding 6,252 6,252
Additional paid-in capital 20,275,963 20,275,963
Accumulated deficit (44,261,152) (44,907,456)
Treasury stock, at cost, 4,620 shares (583,393) (583,393)
------------ ------------

Total stockholders' deficit (24,562,330) (25,208,634)
------------ ------------


Total liabilities and stockholders' deficit $ 31,301,780 $ 30,109,230
------------ ------------


See accompanying notes to the condensed financial statements.


3





Black Warrior Wireline Corp.
CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
For the three months ended March 31, 2005 and March 31, 2004


MARCH 31, 2005 MARCH 31, 2004
(UNAUDITED) (UNAUDITED)


Revenues $ 14,447,772 $ 10,539,320

Operating costs 9,407,401 7,614,350

Selling, general and administrative expenses 2,159,380 2,111,883

Depreciation and amortization 1,283,656 1,199,134

------------ ------------
Income (loss) from continuing operations 1,597,335 (386,047)

Interest expense and amortization of debt discount (961,583) (1,350,266)

Net gain on sale of fixed assets -- 56,347

Other income 10,552 4,344
------------ ------------

Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes 646,304 (1,675,622)

Provision for income taxes -- --
------------ ------------

Income (loss) before discontinued operations 646,304 (1,675,622)

Discontinued operations (Note 5)

Loss from operations of discontinued directional
drilling segment (including estimated loss on
disposal of $1,374,939) -- (1,336,457)

------------ ------------
Net income (loss) $ 646,304 $ (3,012,079)
============ ============

Net income (loss) per share - basic and diluted:

Income (loss) before discontinued operations $ .05 $ (.13)
Discontinued operations -- (.11)
------------ ------------

Net income (loss) per share - basic and diluted $ .05 $ (.24)
============ ============


See accompanying notes to the condensed financial statements.


4




Black Warrior Wireline Corp.
CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For the three months ended March 31, 2005 and March 31, 2004


MARCH 31, 2005 MARCH 31, 2004
(Unaudited) (Unaudited)


Cash flows from operating activities: $ 1,824,080 $(2,008,557)
----------- -----------

Cash flows from investing activities:
Acquisitions of property, plant and equipment (2,045,385) (1,895,798)
(Increase) decrease in restricted cash (934,144) 174,734
Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment -- 319,682
----------- -----------
Cash used in investing activities (2,979,529) (1,401,382)
----------- -----------
Cash flows from financing activities:
Proceeds from bank and other borrowings 99,711 2,438,971
Principal payments on long-term debt, notes payable and
capital lease obligations (1,271,415) (1,818,177)
Proceeds from (payments on) working revolver, net 1,300,000 (1,245,692)
----------- -----------
Cash provided by (used in) financing activities 128,296 (624,898)
----------- -----------

Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents (1,027,153) (4,034,837)
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period 2,647,980 4,661,030
----------- -----------
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period $ 1,620,827 $ 626,193
----------- -----------

Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
Cash paid during the period for:
Interest $ 142,530 $ 332,982
----------- -----------
Income taxes $ -- $ --
----------- -----------


See accompanying notes to the condensed financial statements.


5





BLACK WARRIOR WIRELINE CORP.
NOTES TO CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

1. GENERAL

The accompanying condensed financial statements reflect all adjustments
that, in the opinion of management, are necessary for a fair presentation of the
financial position of Black Warrior Wireline Corp. (the "Company"). Such
adjustments are of a normal recurring nature. The results of operations for the
interim period are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for
the full year. The Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year
ended December 31, 2004 should be read in conjunction with this document.

Business of the Company. The Company is an oil and natural gas service
company currently providing various services to oil and natural gas well
operators primarily in the continental United States and in the Gulf of Mexico.
Through August 6, 2004, the Company's principal lines of business included (a)
wireline services, and (b) directional oil and natural gas well drilling and
downhole surveying services. As discussed in Note 5, on August 6, 2004 the
Company sold its directional drilling division to Multi-Shot, LLC, a newly
formed Texas limited liability company and such business is treated as a
discontinued operation for the three-month period ended March 31, 2004.

Liquidity. The Company reported net income (loss) for the three months
ended March 31, 2005 of approximately $646,000 and for the years ended December
31, 2004, December 31, 2003, and December 31, 2002, of approximately
($1,800,000), ($5,500,000) and ($7,600,000), respectively. Cash flows provided
by operations were approximately $1,800,000 for the three months ended March 31,
2005 and $3,600,000, $10,600,000, and $5,400,000, for the years ended December
31, 2004, 2003, and 2002, respectively. The Company is highly leveraged. The
Company's outstanding indebtedness includes primarily senior indebtedness
aggregating approximately $8.8 million at March 31, 2005, other indebtedness of
approximately $1.9 million and approximately $41.0 million (including
approximately $18.0 million of accrued interest) owing to St. James Merchant
Bankers, L.P. ("SJMB") and St. James Capital Partners, L.P. ("SJCP") and others
who participated with SJMB in the purchase of promissory notes and warrants of
the Company (collectively "the St. James Partnerships") and directors, who are
related parties. The Company's debt and accrued interest owed to related parties
is convertible into common stock and is subordinate to its Senior Credit
Facility with General Electric Capital Corporation ("GECC"). In addition, no
repayments of the related party debt or accrued interest can be made until the
Senior Credit Facility is completely extinguished.

On November 14, 2004, the Company entered into a Restated Credit
Agreement with GECC providing for the extension of revolving and term credit
facilities to the Company aggregating up to $18.0 million. The Restated Credit
Agreement amends, restates and modifies an Original Credit Agreement entered
into as of September 14, 2001, including the amendments thereto. The Restated
Credit Agreement includes a revolving loan of up to $10.0 million, but not
exceeding 85% of eligible accounts receivable and a term loan of $8.0 million.
Eligible accounts are defined to exclude, among other items and subject to
certain exceptions, accounts outstanding of debtors that are more than 60 days
overdue or 90 days following the original invoice date and of debtors that have
suspended business or commenced various insolvency proceedings and accounts with
reserves established against them to the extent of such reserves as GECC may set
from time to time in its reasonable credit judgment. The interest rate on
borrowings under the revolving loan is 1.75% above a base rate and on borrowings
under the term loan is 2.5% above the base rate. The base rate is the higher of
(i) the rate publicly quoted from time to time by the Wall Street Journal as the
base rate on corporate loans posted by at least 75% of the nation's thirty
largest banks, or (ii) the average of the rates on overnight Federal funds
transactions by members of the Federal Reserve System, plus 0.5%. Subject to the
absence of an event of default and fulfillment of certain other conditions, the
Company can elect to borrow or convert any loan and pay interest at the LIBOR
rate plus applicable margins of 3.25% on the revolving loan and 4.0% on the term
loan. If an event of default has occurred, the interest rate is increased by 2%.
Advances under the Restated Credit Agreement are collateralized by a senior lien
against substantially all of the Company's assets. The Restated Credit Agreement
expires on November 14, 2007.

6


Initial borrowings under the Restated Credit Agreement advanced on
November 14, 2004 were $8.0 million borrowed under the term loan. No borrowings
were made under the revolving loan at that time. Proceeds of the initial
borrowings were used to repay indebtedness outstanding under a capex loan under
the Original Credit Agreement in the amount of approximately $4.3 million,
approximately $1.8 million was placed in escrow for the possible repayment of
principal and accrued interest on subordinated secured indebtedness and
approximately $1.9 million was borrowed to be used by the Company for general
corporate purposes. Any funds placed in escrow not used for the repayment of
subordinated secured indebtedness were returned to the Company. Borrowings under
the revolving loan are able to be repaid and re-borrowed from time to time for
working capital and general corporate needs, subject to the Company's continuing
compliance with the terms of the agreement, with the outstanding balance of the
revolving loan to be paid in full at the expiration of the Restated Credit
Agreement on November 14, 2007. The term loan is to be repaid in 35 equal
monthly installments of $133,333 with a final installment of $3,333,345 due and
payable on November 14, 2007.

Note Extensions. In connection with entering into the GECC refinancing
in November 2004, the Company agreed with the holders to extend the maturity
date of the Company's outstanding subordinated secured promissory notes from
December 31, 2004 to February 13 and February 14, 2008 on $23.0 million of the
total $23.9 million principal amount of the notes. The remainder of the
outstanding principal was repaid. The notes bear interest at 15% per annum and
are convertible into shares of the Company's common stock at a conversion price
of $0.75 per share, subject to an anti-dilution adjustment for certain issuances
of securities by the Company at prices per share of common stock less than the
conversion price then in effect, in which event the conversion price is reduced
to the lower price at which the shares were issued. As a condition to extend the
maturity date, the Company extended the expiration date of 66.1 million
outstanding common stock purchase warrants to December 31, 2009.

Strong and stable market conditions and the Company's ability to meet
intense competitive pressures are essential to the Company's maintaining a
positive liquidity position and meeting debt covenant requirements. Decreases in
market conditions or failure to mitigate competitive pressures could result in
non-compliance with its debt covenants and the triggering of the prepayment
clauses of the Company's debt. The Company believes that if market conditions
remain stable during 2005, the Company will be able to generate sufficient cash
flow to meet its working capital needs and comply with its debt covenants
throughout the year 2005. If market conditions decline significantly, the
Company may be required to obtain additional amendments to its Senior Credit
Facility, or obtain capital through equity contributions or financing, including
a possible merger or sale of assets, or other business combination.


7


2. STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION

The Company applies principles from SFAS 123 in accounting for its
stock option plan. In accordance with SFAS 123, the Company has elected not to
report the impact of the fair value of its stock options in the statements of
operations but, instead, to disclose the pro forma effect and to continue to
apply APB Opinion No. 25 and related interpretations in accounting for its stock
options. Accordingly, no compensation expense has been recognized for stock
options issued to employees with an exercise price at fair market value or
above. Compensation expense for options issued to non-employees of the Company
is excluded from the pro forma effect below, as compensation expense has been
recognized in the accompanying financial statements. Had compensation cost for
all of the Company's stock options issued been determined based on the fair
value at the grant dates for awards consistent with the methods prescribed in
SFAS 123 and later in SFAS 148, the Company's net income or loss and income or
loss per share would have been decreased or increased to the pro forma amounts
indicated as follows:



THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31,
----------------------------------------------
2005 2004
---- ----

Net income (loss), as reported $ 646,304 $(3,012,079)
Add (deduct): Total stock-based employee
compensation expense determined under fair
value based method for all awards, net of related
tax effects 51,800 (3,000)
----------- -----------
Pro forma net income (loss) $ 698,104 $(3,015,079)
=========== ===========
Earnings (loss) per share:
Basic and diluted - as reported $ .05 $ (.24)
=========== ===========
Basic and diluted - pro forma $ .06 $ (.24)
=========== ===========


3. EARNINGS PER SHARE

The calculation of basic and diluted earning per share ("EPS") is as
follows:


FOR THE THEE MONTHS ENDED,
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
MARCH 31, 2005 MARCH 31, 2004
------------ ---------------- ---------- ------------- ---------------- ----------
Income Shares Per Share Income Shares Per Share
(Numerator) (Denominator) Amount (Numerator) (Denominator) Amount
------------ ---------------- ---------- ------------- ---------------- ----------


NET INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE - BASIC AND
DILUTED
Income (loss) before discontinued
operations available to common
stockholders $ 646,304 12,499,528 $ .05 $(1,675,622) 12,499,528 $ (.13)


Discontinued operations -- 12,499,528 -- (1,336,457) 12,499,528 (.11)
----------- ------- ----------- -------
Net income (loss) per share - basic and
diluted $ 646,304 12,499,528 $ .05 $(3,012,079) 12,499,528 $ (.24)
----------- ------- ----------- -------



8


Options and warrants to purchase 79,143,983 and 98,794,169 shares of
common stock at prices ranging from $0.75 to $6.63 were outstanding during the
three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively, but were not included
in the computation of diluted EPS because the effect would be anti-dilutive (see
Note 7).

Convertible debt instruments, including convertible interest, which
would result in the issuance of 54,298,629 and 53,003,690 shares of common
stock, if the conversion features were exercised, were outstanding during the
three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively, but were not included
in the computation of the diluted EPS because the effect would be anti-dilutive.
The conversion price of these instruments is $0.75 per share as of March 31,
2005 (see Note 7).

4. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

The Company is a defendant in various legal actions in the ordinary
course of business. Management does not believe the ultimate outcome of these
actions will have a materially adverse effect on the financial position, results
of operations or cash flows of the Company.

5. DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS

On August 6, 2004, the Company completed the sale of its assets
associated with its directional drilling business, (referred to as the
"Multi-Shot Business") pursuant to an Asset Purchase Agreement entered into on
June 3, 2004. The buyer of the Multi-Shot Business was a newly-organized Texas
limited liability company, with the name Multi-Shot, LLC, which included among
its members Allen Neel, formerly the Executive Vice President of the Company, as
well as two of the Company's other former employees employed in the Multi-Shot
Business. These persons are referred to as the Key Multi-Shot Employees. The
Company has been advised that as of August 6, 2004, these persons held less than
a 10% equity interest in the buyer.

The transaction included the sale of all the Company's assets used in
the Multi-Shot Business, including certain real property located in Odessa,
Texas, improvements and fixtures located on the property; machinery and
equipment, receivables, inventories, tangible and intangible assets and all
books, records and files.

The purchase price was $11.0 million consisting of $10.4 million in
cash and approximately $628,000 payable by assignment and release by the three
Key Multi-Shot Employees of their claims under their employment agreements with
the Company to change of control payments that may be due in the aggregate of
that amount. The purchase price was subject to adjustment at and as of the
closing of the sale for increases and decreases in the Multi-Shot Business' net
working capital of $270,000 as of November 30, 2003 and increases and decreases
in its inventory of approximately $5,207,000 as of December 31, 2003. On the
basis of an initial closing date balance sheet prepared by the Company and
delivered at the closing of the sale on August 6, 2004, the purchase price was
reduced by a net adjustment of approximately $22,000. This net adjustment
reflected a decrease in net working capital subsequent to November 30, 2003
through the closing of approximately $552,000, and an increase in inventory
value subsequent to December 31, 2003 through the closing of approximately
$530,000.



9


The Asset Purchase Agreement provided that within 45 days after the
closing, the buyer was to prepare and deliver a proposed final closing date
balance sheet to include the buyer's calculation of the final adjustment amounts
for increases and decreases as of the closing date in net working capital of
$270,000 as of November 30, 2003 and increases and decreases as of the closing
date in inventory of approximately $5,207,000 as of December 31, 2003, which
adjustments, when determined, would result in establishing the final purchase
price.

Out of the net cash proceeds from the sale of the Multi-Shot Business,
approximately $9.6 million was applied to the reduction of indebtedness owing to
the Company's senior secured creditor.

In February 2005, the Company entered into a Compromise Agreement with
the buyer resolving certain matters that had arisen under the Asset Purchase
Agreement subsequent to the closing. Among the matters resolved was the
determination of the final purchase price adjustment under the asset purchase
agreement and resolution of the capital expenditure note issued by the buyer at
the closing. Pursuant to the Compromise Agreement, the Company paid to the buyer
$940,000, and the principal amount of the buyer's capital expenditure note,
which was increased to approximately $168,000, was deemed paid. Among other
things, the Company's payment reflected a compromise with respect to any and all
claims of the buyer with respect to accounts receivable and also reflected a
compromise with respect to the final purchase price adjustment. In addition, the
Company's representations warranties and covenants in the Asset Purchase
Agreement as to the Multi-Shot Business relating to inventory, net working
capital, purchase price adjustments, financial statements, accounts receivable,
condition of assets (other than real property and leased real property) were
agreed not to survive the execution of the Compromise Agreement. Otherwise, the
representations warranties and covenants of the Asset Purchase Agreement
continue in effect.

6. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

The Company has executed notes payable to SJMB and SJCP. The chairman
and an employee of SJMB, L.L.C., the general partner of SJMB, both serve on the
Company's Board of Directors. At March 31, 2005 and 2004, notes due to SJMB,
SJCP, and related parties totaled $23.0 million and $24.6 million, respectively.
The notes bear interest at 15% and permit conversion to equity, which would
result in substantial dilutions to existing shareholders.

7. ISSUANCE OF COMMON STOCK

The Company has outstanding at March 31, 2005 common stock purchase
warrants, options and convertible debt securities entitled to purchase or to be
converted into an aggregate 133,442,612 shares of the Company's common stock at
exercise and conversion prices ranging from $0.75 to $2.63. Accordingly, if all
such securities were exercised or converted, the 12,499,528 shares of Common
Stock issued and outstanding on March 31, 2005, would represent 8.6% of the
shares outstanding on a fully diluted basis.


10


8. INCOME TAXES

The difference between the statutory rate and the effective rate
relates to federal tax net operating loss carryforwards (NOL's) that unless
utilized, expire at various dates beginning 2010 through 2022. The Company's
utilization of NOL's is subject to a number of uncertainties including the
ability to generate future taxable income. Accordingly, full valuation
allowances have been provided for NOL's generated in each period with no
benefits recognized.

9. RECENTLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

In December 2003, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB)
issued Interpretation No. 46 (revised December 2003) ("FIN 46(R)"),
Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities, an interpretation of ARB 51. The
primary objectives of FIN 46(R) are to provide guidance on the identification of
entities for which control is achieved through means other than through voting
rights ("variable interest entities" or "VIEs") and how to determine if a
business enterprise should consolidate the VIEs. This new model for
consolidation applies to an entity for which either: the equity investors (if
any) do not have a controlling financial interest; or the equity investment at
risk is insufficient to finance the entity's activities without receiving
additional subordinated financial support from other parties. In addition, FIN
46(R) requires that all enterprises with a significant variable interest in a
VIE make additional disclosures regarding their relationship with the VIE. The
interpretation requires public entities to apply FIN 46(R) to all entities that
are considered Special Purpose Entities in practice and under the FASB
literature that was applied before the issuance of FIN 46(R). The adoption of
FIN 46(R) had no effect on the Company's financial statements.

On December 21, 2004, FASB Staff Position (FSP) FAS 109-1, "Application
of FASB Statement No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes, to the Tax Deduction on
Qualified Production Activities Provided by the American Jobs Creation Act of
2004, was issued. FSP FAS 109-1 clarifies that this tax deduction should be
accounted for as a special deduction in accordance with Statement 109. As such,
the special deduction has no effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities
existing at the date of enactment. Rather, the impact of this deduction will be
reported in the period in which the deduction is claimed on the Company's tax
return beginning in 2005. As regulations are still pending, the Company has not
been able to quantify the impact.

EITF Issue 03-13, "Applying the Conditions in Paragraph 42 of FASB
Statement No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived
Assets, in Determining Whether to Report Discontinued Operations," provides
guidance regarding the application of paragraph 42 of Statement 144 (AC Section
I14) in determining whether to report discontinued operations and is effective
for components classified as held for sale or disposed of in fiscal periods
beginning after December 15, 2004. The adoption of EITF Issue 03-13 had no
effect on the Company's financial statements.

In December 2004, the FASB issued Statement 123 (revised 2004),
Share-Based Payments (SFAS 123(R)). This Statement requires that the costs of
employee share-based payments be measured at fair value on the awards' grant
date using an option-pricing model and recognized in the financial statements
over the requisite service period. This Statement does not change the accounting
for stock ownership plans, which are subject to American Institute of Certified
Public Accountants SOP 93-6, Employer's Accounting for Employee Stock Ownership
Plans. SFAS 123(R) supersedes Opinion 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to
Employees and its related interpretations, and eliminates the alternative to use
Opinion 25's intrinsic value method of accounting, which the Company is
currently using. Certain stock awards may be considered liabilities instead of
equity components under SFAS 123(R).



11


SFAS 123(R) allows for two alternative transition methods. The first
method is the modified prospective application whereby compensation cost for the
portion of awards for which the requisite service has not yet been rendered that
are outstanding as of the adoption date will be recognized over the remaining
service period. The compensation cost for that portion of awards will be based
on the grant-date fair value of those awards as calculated for pro forma
disclosures under SFAS 123, as originally issued. All new awards and awards that
are modified, repurchased, or cancelled after the adoption date will be
accounted for under the provisions of SFAS 123(R). The second method is the
modified retrospective application, which requires that the Company restate
prior period financial statements. The modified retrospective application may be
applied either to all prior periods or only to prior interim periods in the year
of adoption of this statement. The Company is currently determining which
transition method it will adopt and is evaluating the impact SFAS 123(R) will
have on its financial position, results of operations, EPS and cash flows when
the Statement is adopted.

On March 29, 2005, the SEC issued Staff Accounting Bulletin "SAB" No.
107 regarding the interaction between SFAS 123(R) which was revised in December
2004 and certain SEC rules and regulations and provides the SEC's staff views
regarding the valuation of share-based payment arrangements for public
companies. The Company is evaluating the impact this guidance will have on its
financial condition, results of operations, EPS and cash flows.

On April 14, 2005, the SEC issued a press release that revised the
required date of adoption under SFAS 123(R). The new rule allows for companies
to adopt the provisions of SFAS 123(R) beginning on the first annual period
beginning after June 15, 2005. Based on the new required adoption date, the
Company plans to adopt SFAS 123(R) as of the beginning of the first quarter of
2006. The Company is evaluating the impact this guidance will have on its
financial condition, results of operations, EPS and cash flows.

10. SUBSEQUENT EVENT

On April 28, 2005, the Company announced that it has entered into a
Letter of Intent with affiliates of Centre Partners Management LLC and Centre
Southwest Partners LLC (collectively "Centre") for the acquisition of the
Company by an affiliate of Centre. The transaction is subject to, among other
things, the preparation and execution of definitive legal documentation and the
approval of the stockholders of the Company. If completed, the transaction will
result in payment of merger consideration to each Company stockholder of $0.75
per share. The transaction would result in the repayment or assumption at
closing by the acquirer of substantially all of the outstanding liabilities and
indebtedness of the Company. The Company cannot make any assurance that the
transaction will be completed or, if completed, that it will be completed on the
terms announced.


12


ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

GENERAL

The Company's results of operations are affected primarily by the
extent of utilization and rates paid for its wireline services and equipment.
The energy services sector is completely dependent upon the upstream spending by
the oil and natural gas exploration and production side of the industry. A
decline in oil and natural gas commodity prices can be expected to result in a
decline in the demand for the Company's services and equipment. The Company
believes that information regarding the count of active drilling rigs in use in
the continental United States as well as offshore in the Gulf of Mexico can be
used as an indicator of current likely demand for oil and natural gas well
services. Fluctuations in oil and natural gas commodity prices are frequently
followed by fluctuations in the number of active drilling rigs. The Company
showed improvement in revenues during 2004 over 2003 and 2002 reflecting the
increased count of active drilling rigs during those years. Inasmuch as oil and
natural gas commodity prices are subject to frequent material fluctuations,
there can be no assurance that the Company's revenues in 2005 will equal or
exceed its revenues in 2004 and prior years. There can be no assurance that the
Company will continue to experience any material increase in the demand for and
utilization of its services or that the Company will achieve profitability.

On April 28, 2005, the Company announced that it has entered into a
Letter of Intent with affiliates of Centre Partners Management LLC and Centre
Southwest Partners LLC (collectively "Centre") for the acquisition of the
Company by an affiliate of Centre. The transaction is subject to, among other
things, the preparation and execution of definitive legal documentation and the
approval of the stockholders of the Company. If completed, the transaction will
result in payment of merger consideration to each Company stockholder of $0.75
per share. The transaction would result in the repayment or assumption at
closing by the acquirer of substantially all of the outstanding liabilities and
indebtedness of the Company. The Company cannot make any assurance that the
transaction will be completed or, if completed, that it will be completed on the
terms announced.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS - THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2005 COMPARED TO THREE
MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2004

The Company sold its directional drilling division business on August
6, 2004 and the operations of this division are reported in the financial
statements included in this Report as discontinued operations. The comparisons
detailed below reflect the Company's continuing operations.

The following table sets forth the Company's revenues from its
continuing operations for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004,
respectively:



13


THREE MONTHS ENDED
MARCH 31, 2005 MARCH 31, 2004
------------------------ -------------------------
$14,447,772 $10,539,320

Total revenues increased by approximately $3.9 million to approximately
$14.4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2005 as compared to total
revenues of approximately $10.5 million for the three months ended March 31,
2004. Revenues for the three months ended March 31, 2005 increased as a result
of an increase in the demand for the Company's services which primarily resulted
from continued high prices for oil and natural gas and increased drilling
activity, evidenced by the higher rig count.

Operating costs increased by approximately $1.8 million for the three
months ended March 31, 2005, as compared to the same period of 2004. Operating
costs were 65.1% of revenues for the three months ended March 31, 2005 as
compared with 72.2% of revenues for the same periods in 2004. The decrease in
operating costs as a percentage of revenues was primarily the result of the
higher overall level of activities in the three months ended March 31, 2005
compared with 2004. Salaries and benefits increased by approximately $1.2
million for the three months ended March 31, 2005, as compared to the same
period in 2004. Total number of employees increased from 278 at March 31, 2004
to 340 at March 31, 2005. The increase in salaries and benefits is primarily due
to the increase in employee levels from 2004.

Selling, general and administrative expenses increased by approximately
$48,000 to $2.2 million in the three months ended March 31, 2005. As a
percentage of revenues, selling, general and administrative expenses decreased
to 14.9% in the three months ended March 31, 2005 from 20.0% in 2004.

Depreciation and amortization increased by approximately $85,000 in the
three months ended March 31, 2005 to $1.3 million or 8.9% of revenues, from
approximately $1.2 million or 11.4% of revenues for 2004. The increase was
primarily due to additions of approximately $7.6 million for property, plant and
equipment for the twelve months ended March 31, 2005.

Interest expense and amortization of debt discount decreased by
approximately $389,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2005 as compared to
the same period in 2004. The decline in interest expense is attributable to the
reduction in the Company's senior debt outstanding. See "Note 9 of Notes to
Financial Statements" in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal
year ended December 31, 2004.

The Company's net income for the quarter ended March 31, 2005 was
approximately $646,000 compared with a net loss of approximately $3.0 million
for the quarter ended March 31, 2004. The net income for the quarter ended March
31, 2005 was the result of an increase in revenues resulting from an increase in
demand for the Company's services.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

Cash provided by the Company's operating activities was approximately
$1.8 million for the three months ended March 31, 2005 as compared to cash used
of approximately $2.0 million for the same period in 2004. Cash flows from
operating activities increased by approximately $3.8 million during the three
months ended March 31, 2005 mainly as a result in the increase in demand for the
Company's services. Investing activities used cash of approximately $2.0 million
during the three months ended March 31, 2005 for the acquisition of property,
plant and equipment. During the three months ended March 31, 2004, investing
activities used cash of approximately $1.9 million for the acquisition of
property, plant and equipment. During the three months ended March 31, 2005,
financing activities used cash of approximately $1.3 million for principal
payments on debt offset by proceeds on net draws on working capital revolving
loans and other borrowings of approximately $1.4 million. For the same period in
2004, financing activities provided cash of approximately $2.4 million from
proceeds from bank and other borrowings offset by principal payments on debt and
net payments on working capital revolving loans of approximately $3.1 million.



14


The Company's outstanding indebtedness includes primarily senior
indebtedness aggregating approximately $8.8 million at March 31, 2005, other
indebtedness of approximately $1.9 million and approximately $41.0 million
(including approximately $18.0 million of accrued interest) owing to the St.
James Partnerships.

GECC Credit Facility. On November 14, 2004, the Company entered into
the Restated Credit Agreement with GECC providing for the extension of revolving
and term credit facilities to the Company aggregating up to $18.0 million. The
Restated Credit Agreement amends, restates and modifies the Original Credit
Agreement entered into as of September 14, 2001, including the amendments
thereto. The Restated Credit Agreement includes a revolving loan of up to $10.0
million, but not exceeding 85% of eligible accounts receivable and a term loan
of $8.0 million. Eligible accounts are defined to exclude, among other items and
subject to certain exceptions, accounts outstanding of debtors that are more
than 60 days overdue or 90 days following the original invoice date and of
debtors that have suspended business or commenced various insolvency proceedings
and accounts with reserves established against them to the extent of such
reserves as GECC may set from time to time in its reasonable credit judgment.
The interest rate on borrowings under the revolving loan is 1.75% above a base
rate and on borrowings under the term loan is 2.5% above the base rate. The base
rate is the higher of (i) the rate publicly quoted from time to time by the Wall
Street Journal as the base rate on corporate loans posted by at least 75% of the
nation's thirty largest banks, or (ii) the average of the rates on overnight
Federal funds transactions by members of the Federal Reserve System, plus 0.5%.
Subject to the absence of an event of default and fulfillment of certain other
conditions, the Company can elect to borrow or convert any loan and pay interest
at the LIBOR rate plus applicable margins of 3.25% on the revolving loan and
4.0% on the term loan. If an event of default has occurred, the interest rate is
increased by 2%. Advances under the Restated Credit Agreement are collateralized
by a senior lien against substantially all of the Company's assets. The Restated
Credit Agreement expires on November 14, 2007.

Initial borrowings under the Restated Credit Agreement advanced on
September 14, 2004 were $8.0 million borrowed under the term loan. No borrowings
were made under the revolving loan at that time. Proceeds of the initial
borrowings were used to repay indebtedness outstanding under a capex loan under
the Original Credit Agreement in the amount of approximately $4.3 million,
approximately $1.8 million was placed in escrow for the possible repayment of
principal and accrued interest on subordinated secured indebtedness and
approximately $1.9 million was borrowed to be used by the Company for general
corporate purposes. Any funds placed in escrow not used for the repayment of
subordinated secured indebtedness were returned to the Company. Borrowings under
the revolving loan are able to be repaid and re-borrowed from time to time for
working capital and general corporate needs, subject to the Company's continuing
compliance with the terms of the agreement, with the outstanding balance of the
revolving loan to be paid in full at the expiration of the Restated Credit
Agreement on November 14, 2007. The term loan is to be repaid in 35 equal
monthly installments of $133,333 with a final installment of $3,333,345 due and
payable on November 14, 2007.



15


At March 31, 2005, borrowings under the term loan were $7.5 million and
borrowings under the revolving loan were $1.3 million.

Borrowings under the Restated Credit Agreement may be prepaid or the
facility terminated or reduced by the Company at any time subject to the payment
of certain pre-payment fees declining from 3% to 1% in the event the termination
or reduction during the first, second or third year of the term of the Restated
Credit Agreement, providing a reduced fee is payable in the event the
indebtedness is prepaid out of the proceeds of a sale of the Company prior to
June 30, 2005. The Company is required to prepay borrowings out of the net
proceeds from the sale of any assets, subject to certain exceptions, or the
stock of any subsidiary, the net proceeds from the sale of any stock or debt
securities by the Company, and any borrowings in excess of the applicable
borrowing availability, including borrowings under the term loan in excess of
70% of the forced liquidation value of eligible term loan equipment. The forced
liquidation value of the eligible term loan equipment is established by
appraisal conducted from time to time but not more than twice per year.

Initial borrowings under the Restated Credit Agreement were subject to
the fulfillment at or before the closing of a number of closing conditions,
including among others, the accuracy of the representations and warranties made
by the Company in the loan agreement, delivery of executed loan documents,
officers' certificates, an opinion of counsel, the extension of the maturity
date of approximately $5.4 million principal amount of the Company's outstanding
subordinated notes to a date 90 days after the maturity date of the Restated
Credit Facility with no payments of principal or interest to be made prior to
that date, and the completion of legal due diligence. Future advances are
subject to the continuing accuracy of the Company's representations and
warranties as of such date (other than those relating expressly to an earlier
date), the absence of any event or circumstance constituting a "material adverse
effect," as defined, the absence of any default or event of default under the
Restated Credit Agreement, and the borrowings not exceeding the applicable
borrowing availability under the Restated Credit Agreement, after giving effect
to such advance. A "material adverse effect" is defined to include an event
having a material adverse effect on the Company's business, assets, operations,
prospects or financial or other condition, on the Company's ability to pay the
loans, or on the collateral and also includes a decline in the "Average Rig
Count" (excluding Canada and international rigs) published by Baker Hughes, Inc.
falling below 675 for 12 consecutive weeks.

Under the Restated Credit Agreement, the Company is obligated to
maintain compliance with a number of affirmative and negative covenants.
Affirmative covenants the Company must comply with include requirements to
maintain its corporate existence and continue the conduct of its business
substantially as conducted in November 2004, promptly pay all taxes and
governmental assessments and levies, maintain its corporate records, maintain
insurance, comply with applicable laws and regulations, provide supplemental
disclosure to the lenders, conduct its affairs without violating the
intellectual property of others, conduct its operations in compliance with
environmental laws and provide a mortgage or deed of trust to the lenders
granting a first lien on the Company's real estate upon the request of the
lenders, and provide certificates of title on newly acquired equipment with the
lender's lien noted.



16


Negative covenants the Company may not violate include, among others,
(i) forming or acquiring a subsidiary, merging with, acquiring all or
substantially all the assets or stock of another person, (ii) making an
investment in or loan to another person, (iii) incurring any indebtedness other
than permitted indebtedness, (iv) entering into any transaction with an
affiliate except on fair and reasonable terms no less favorable than would be
obtained from a non-affiliated person, (v) making loans to employees in amounts
exceeding $50,000 to any employee and a maximum of $250,000 in the aggregate,
(vi) making any change in its business objectives or operations that could
adversely affect repayment of the loans or in its capital structure, including
the issuance of any stock, warrants or convertible securities or any revision in
the terms of outstanding stock except for permitted payments to holders of
subordinated debt and options granted under an existing or future incentive
option plan, amend its charter or by-laws in a manner that would adversely
affect the duty or ability of the Company to repay the indebtedness, or engage
in any business other than that engaged in by it on November 14, 2004 (vii)
creating or permitting to exist any liens on its properties or assets, with the
exception of those granted to the lenders or in existence on the date of making
the loan, (viii) selling any of its properties or other assets, including the
stock of any subsidiary, except inventory in the ordinary course of business and
equipment or fixtures with a value not exceeding $100,000 per transaction and
$250,000 per year, (ix) failing to comply with the various financial covenants
in the loan agreement, (x) making any restricted payment, including payment of
dividends, stock or warrant redemptions, repaying subordinated debt, rescission
of the sale of outstanding stock, (xi) making any payments to stockholders of
the Company other than compensation to employees and payments of management fees
to any stockholder or affiliate of the Company, or (xii) amending or changing
the terms of the Company's subordinated debt.

The financial covenants prohibit the Company from making capital
expenditures in any fiscal year in an aggregate amount exceeding $3.0 million
and require the Company to have at the end of each fiscal quarter commencing
with the quarter ending December 31, 2004 a ratio of EDITDA to fixed charges,
including interest expense, scheduled payments of principal, capital
expenditures paid and income taxes paid, for the twelve months then ended of 1.5
to 1.0. For the purpose of such calculation, fixed charges for the twelve months
ended December 31, 2004 are calculated as the fixed charges for the quarter
ended December 31, 2004 multiplied by four, fixed charges for the twelve months
ended March 31, 2005 are calculated as the fixed charges for the six months
ended March 31, 2005 multiplied by two, and fixed charges for the twelve months
ended June 30, 2005 are calculated as the fixed charges for the nine months
ended June 30, 2005 multiplied by one and one-third.

Events of default under the Restated Credit Agreement include, among
others, (a) the failure to pay when due principal or interest or fees owing
under the Restated Credit Agreement, (b) the failure to perform the covenants
under the Restated Credit Agreement relating to use of proceeds, maintenance of
a cash management system, maintenance of insurance, delivery of certificates of
title, delivery of certain post closing documents, including evidence of key man
life insurance on the lives of William Jenkins and Ron Whitter, maintenance of
compliance with the financial covenants in the loan agreement and maintenance of
compliance with the loan agreement's negative covenants, (c) the failure, within
specified periods of 3 or 5 days of when due, to deliver monthly un-audited and
annual audited financial statements, annual operating plans, and other reports,
notices and information, (d) the failure to perform any other provision of the
loan agreement which remains un-remedied for 20 days or more, (e) a default or
breach under any other agreement to which the Company is a party beyond any
grace period that involves the failure to pay in excess of $250,000 or causes or
permits to cause in excess of $250,000 of indebtedness to become due prior to
its stated maturity, (f) any representation or warranty or certificate delivered
to the lenders being untrue or incorrect in any material respect, (g) a change
of control of the Company, (h) the occurrence of an event having a material
adverse effect, and (i) the attachment, seizure or levy upon of assets of the
Company which continues for 30 days or more and various other bankruptcy and
other events. Upon the occurrence of a default or event of default, the lenders
may discontinue making loans to the Company. Upon the occurrence of an event of
default, the lenders may terminate the Restated Credit Agreement, declare all
indebtedness outstanding under the Restated Credit Agreement due and payable,
and exercise any of their rights under the Restated Credit Agreement which
includes the ability to foreclose on the Company's assets.



17


There can be no assurance that the Company will be able to remain in
compliance with these financial and other covenants or be able to obtain such
amendments, consents or waivers of with respect to potential violations of these
covenants when required. The Company's inability to do so may result in the
Company being placed in violation of those financial and other covenants. The
Company can make no assurances that it will remain in compliance with its debt
covenants or generate sufficient cash flows to service its debt and fund
operations. Failure to comply with these debt covenants and or generate
sufficient cash flow from operations could significantly impair the Company's
liquidity position and could result in GECC exercising mandatory prepayment
options under the Company's Restated Credit Agreement. Should the Company be
unable to borrow funds under its Restated Credit Agreement or if prepayment of
those borrowings were required, the Company can make no assurances that
alternative funding could be obtained.

Reference is made to the Credit Agreement, filed as an Exhibit to the
Company's Current Report on Form 8-K for November 14, 2004, for a complete
statement of the terms and conditions.

Subordinated Secured Indebtedness - Note Extensions. In connection with
entering into the GECC refinancing in November 2004, the Company agreed with the
holders to extend the maturity date of the Company's outstanding subordinated
secured promissory notes from December 31, 2004 to February 13 and February 14,
2008 on $23.0 million of the total $23.9 million principal amount of the notes.
The remainder of the outstanding principal was repaid. The notes bear interest
at 15% per annum and are convertible into shares of the Company's common stock
at a conversion price of $0.75 per share, subject to an anti-dilution adjustment
for certain issuances of securities by the Company at prices per share of common
stock less than the conversion price then in effect, in which event the
conversion price is reduced to the lower price at which the shares were issued.
As a condition to extend the maturity date, the Company extended the expiration
date of 66.1 million outstanding common stock purchase warrants to December 31,
2009.



18


All of the debt and interest owed under the subordinated secured
promissory notes is subordinated to the Company's senior credit facility and
cannot be repaid until all the amounts owed pursuant to the Credit Facility have
been repaid.

Substantially all of the Company's assets are pledged as collateral for
the indebtedness outstanding under the subordinated secured promissory notes,
which are subordinated in the payment of principal and interest to indebtedness
owing to GECC, the Company's senior lender.

Other Indebtedness. In December 2004, the Company incurred indebtedness
of approximately $2.3 million in connection with financing the payment of annual
insurance premiums in that amount. The indebtedness is payable in monthly
installments ending in September 2005.

Other Liquidity Matters. The Company believes that with the extension
in November 2004 of its revolving and term credit facility with GECC with an
expiration of November 14, 2007, the extension of the maturity of its
subordinated indebtedness to February 2008 and the current and projected
operating environment of the oil and natural gas industry, it will be able to
meet its 2005 liquidity requirements. In addition to funding operating expenses,
cash requirements for 2005 and 2006 are expected to be comprised mainly of
amortization payments on indebtedness and funding capital improvements. Such
cash requirements are expected to be funded from the Company's operating cash
flows. For a discussion of certain risk factors, see "Risks Related to the
Company" and "Risk Factors Related to the Oil and Gas Well Service Business" in
the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004.

SJCP and SJMB, their general partners and Charles E. Underbrink, who is
a Director of the Company and a director of the general partners of the St.
James Partnerships, were added as defendants in an amended complaint filed in
March 2005 in Texas by two of the limited partners of the St. James
Partnerships. The action was originally instituted in December 2004 against the
auditors of the St. James Partnerships. The plaintiffs brought the action as a
class action on behalf of all the limited partners of the St. James Partnerships
and are seeking class action certification. No claim has been asserted against
the Company and the Company is not a defendant in the action. However, the
complaint and the amended complaint in the action contain allegations that the
Company participated with Mr. Underbrink in actions the plaintiffs allege were
fraudulent and constituted securities violations. The Company has not concluded
that it is probable that a claim will be asserted against it and does not
believe that if a claim is asserted that there is a reasonable possibility that
the outcome would be unfavorable to the Company or that any resulting liability
would be material to the Company's financial condition.

INFLATION

The Company's revenues have been and are expected to continue to be
affected by fluctuations in the prices for oil and gas. Inflationary pressures
did not have a significant effect on the Company's operations in the three
months ended March 31, 2005.



19


SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

The Company's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations is based upon its financial statements, which have been
prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States. The preparation of these financial statements requires the
Company to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of
assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosures of
contingent assets and liabilities. On an on-going basis, the Company evaluates
its estimates, including those related to the allowance for bad debts,
inventory, long-lived assets, intangibles and goodwill. The Company bases its
estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are
believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the
basis for making judgments about the carrying value of assets and liabilities
that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from
these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.

The Company maintains allowances for doubtful accounts for estimated
losses resulting from the inability of its customers to make required payments.
If the financial condition of the Company's customers were to deteriorate,
resulting in an impairment of their ability to make payments, additional
allowances may be required.

The Company assesses the impairment of identifiable intangibles,
long-lived assets and related goodwill whenever events or changes in
circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable. When the
Company determines that the carrying value of intangibles, long-lived assets and
related goodwill may not be recoverable, any impairment is measured at fair
value based on a projected discounted net cash flows expected to result from
that asset, including eventual disposition.

Property and equipment are carried at original cost less applicable
depreciation. Depreciation is recognized on the straight-line basis over lives
ranging from two to ten years. Major renewals and improvements are capitalized
and depreciated over each asset's estimated remaining useful life. Maintenance
and repair costs are charged to expense as incurred. When assets are sold or
retired, the remaining costs and related accumulated depreciation are removed
from the accounts and any resulting gain or loss is included in income. Property
and equipment held and used by the Company are reviewed for impairment whenever
events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amounts may not be
recoverable. The Company estimates the future undiscounted cash flows of the
affected assets to determine the recoverability of carrying amounts. Warrants
are valued based upon an independent valuation. The difference between the face
value of the warrant issued and the value per the valuation is amortized into
income through interest expense over the life of the related debt instrument.

CAUTIONARY STATEMENT FOR PURPOSES OF THE "SAFE HARBOR" PROVISIONS OF THE PRIVATE
SECURITIES LITIGATION REFORM ACT OF 1995

With the exception of historical matters, the matters discussed in this
Report are "forward-looking statements" as defined under the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended, that involve risks and uncertainties. The Company
intends that the forward-looking statements herein be covered by the safe-harbor
provisions for forward-looking statements contained in the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended, and this statement is included for the purpose of
complying with these safe-harbor provisions. Forward-looking statements include,
but are not limited to, the matters described herein, including Management's



20


Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations. Such
forward-looking statements relate to the Company's ability to generate revenues
and attain and maintain profitability and cash flow, the stability and level of
prices for oil and natural gas, predictions and expectations as to the
fluctuations in the levels of oil and natural gas prices, pricing in the oil and
natural gas services industry and the willingness of customers to commit for oil
and natural gas well services, the ability of the Company to complete the
proposed transaction announced on April 28, 2005 relating to the proposed
acquisition of the Company by Centre, or to engage in any other strategic
transaction, including any possible merger, sale of all or a portion of the
Company's wireline service assets or other business combination transaction
involving the Company's wireline service business, the ability of the Company to
raise additional debt or equity capital to meet its requirements and to obtain
additional financing when and if required, the Company's ability to maintain
compliance with the covenants of its various loan documents and other agreements
pursuant to which securities, including debt instruments, have been issued and
obtain waivers of violations that occur and consents to amendments as required,
the Company's ability to implement and, if appropriate, expand a cost-cutting
program, if required, the ability of the Company to compete in the premium oil
and natural gas services market, the ability of the Company to re-deploy its
equipment among regional operations as required, and the ability of the Company
to provide services using state of the art tooling. The inability of the Company
to meet these objectives or requirements or the consequences on the Company from
adverse developments in general economic conditions, changes in capital markets,
adverse developments in the oil and natural gas industry, developments in
international relations and the commencement or expansion of hostilities by the
United States or other governments and events of terrorism, declines and
fluctuations in the prices for oil and natural gas, and other factors could have
a material adverse effect on the Company. Material declines in the prices for
oil and natural gas can be expected to adversely affect the Company's revenues.
Any such adverse developments could adversely affect the Company's ability to
complete the proposed transaction with Centre. The Company cautions readers that
various risk factors could cause the Company's operating results and financial
condition to differ materially from those expressed in any forward-looking
statements made by the Company and could adversely affect the Company's
financial condition and its ability to pursue its business strategy and plans
and proposed transaction with Centre. Readers should refer to the Company's
Annual Report on Form 10-K and the risk factors disclosed therein.

ITEM 3. QUALITATIVE AND QUANTITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

From time to time, the Company holds financial instruments comprised of
debt securities and time deposits. All such instruments are classified as
securities available for sale. The Company does not invest in portfolio equity
securities, or commodities, or use financial derivatives for trading or hedging
purposes. The Company's debt security portfolio represents funds held
temporarily pending use in its business and operations. The Company manages
these funds accordingly. The Company seeks reasonable assuredness of the safety
of principal and market liquidity by investing in rated fixed income securities
while, at the same time, seeking to achieve a favorable rate of return. The
Company's market risk exposure consists of exposure to changes in interest rates
and to the risks of changes in the credit quality of issuers. The Company
typically invests in investment grade securities with a term of three years or
less. The Company believes that any exposure to interest rate risk is not
material.



21


Under the Restated Credit Agreement with GECC, the Company is subject
to market risk exposure related to changes in the prime interest rate. Assuming
the Company's level of borrowings from GECC at March 31, 2005 remained unchanged
throughout 2005, if a 100 basis point increase in interest rates under the
Restated Credit Agreement from rates in existence at December 31, 2004 prevailed
throughout the year 2005, it would increase the Company's 2005 interest expense
by approximately $88,000.

ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Under the supervision and with the participation of the Company's
management, including William Jenkins, its President and Chief Executive
Officer, and Ronald Whitter, its Chief Financial Officer, the Company has
evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of its disclosure
controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report, and,
based on their evaluation, Mr. Jenkins and Mr. Whitter have concluded that these
controls and procedures are effective. There were no significant changes in the
Company's internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect
these controls subsequent to the date of their evaluation.

Disclosure controls and procedures are the Company's controls and other
procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed
by it in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act are
recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified
in the Securities and Exchange Commission's rules and forms. Disclosure controls
and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to
ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports
that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated
to the Company's management, including Mr. Jenkins and Mr. Whitter, as
appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.


22



PART II - OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K

(a) Exhibits

31.1 Certification of President and Chief Executive
Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)
31.2 Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant
to Rule 13a-14(a)
32.1 Certification of President and Chief Executive
Officer Pursuant to Section 1350 (furnished,
not filed)
32.2 Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant
to Section 1350 (furnished, not filed)


(b) Reports on Form 8-K

The Company filed the following Current Reports on
Form 8-K in response to the Items named:

Report Date Item

March 16, 2005 Item 1.01. Entry Into a Material
Definitive Agreement.



23





SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 the
Registrant has duly caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

BLACK WARRIOR WIRELINE CORP.
----------------------------
(Registrant)


Date: May 13, 2005 /S/ William L. Jenkins
------------------------------------
William L. Jenkins
President and Chief Executive Officer


/S/ Ronald Whitter
------------------------------
Ronald Whitter
Chief Financial Officer









24