UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
[Mark One]
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT
TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2003
OR
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT
TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from | to |
Commission file number 0-26482
TRIKON TECHNOLOGIES, INC. (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) |
|
Delaware |
95-4054321 |
(State or other jurisdiction
of incorporation or organization) |
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
Ringland Way,
Newport, South Wales NP18 2TA, United Kingdom |
|
(Address of principal
executive offices) |
(Zip Code) |
Registrants telephone number, including area code 44-1633-414-000 | |
Not Applicable |
|
Former name, former address and
former fiscal year, if changed since last report |
|
Indicate by check whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Sections 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes . No
As of October 22, 2003, the total number of outstanding shares of the Registrants common stock was 15,527,568.
1
Trikon Technologies, Inc.
INDEX
2
Trikon Technologies, Inc.
PART 1 – FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands, except share data)
September 30, 2003 |
December 31, 2002 |
||||||
(Unaudited) | (Note A) | ||||||
Assets |
|||||||
Current assets: |
|||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 25,125 | $ | 42,557 | |||
Accounts receivable, net |
10,301 | 8,948 | |||||
Inventories, net |
17,552 | 20,486 | |||||
Prepaid and other current assets |
2,843 | 2,671 | |||||
Total current assets |
55,821 | 74,662 | |||||
Property, equipment and leasehold improvements, net |
17,279 | 19,636 | |||||
Demonstration systems, net |
2,503 | 2,669 | |||||
Other assets |
187 | 221 | |||||
Total assets |
$ | 75,790 | $ | 97,188 | |||
Liabilities and shareholders equity |
|||||||
Current liabilities: |
|||||||
Accounts payable
and accrued expenses |
$ | 5,943 | $ | 4,510 | |||
Current portion of long-term debt |
13,069 | 8,651 | |||||
Deferred revenue |
2,307 | 1,169 | |||||
Other current liabilities |
4,258 | 5,288 | |||||
Total current liabilities |
25,577 | 19,618 | |||||
Long-term debt less current portion |
211 | 10,717 | |||||
Pension obligations |
330 | 5,313 | |||||
Other non-current
liabilities |
908 | 1,020 | |||||
27,026 | 36,668 | ||||||
Shareholders equity: |
|||||||
Preferred Stock: |
|||||||
Authorized shares – 20,000,000 |
|||||||
Issued and outstanding – Nil at September 30, 2003 and December 31, 2002 |
|||||||
Common Stock, $0.001 par value: |
|||||||
Authorized shares – 50,000,000 |
|||||||
Issued and outstanding – 14,127,568 at September 30, 2003 and 14,025,702 at December 31, 2002 |
254,636 | 254,536 | |||||
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
(235 | ) | (8,400 | ) | |||
Deferred compensation |
| (569 | ) | ||||
Accumulated deficit |
(205,637 | ) | (185,047 | ) | |||
Total shareholders equity |
48,764 | 60,520 | |||||
Total liabilities and shareholders equity |
$ | 75,790 | $ | 97,188 | |||
See Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
3
Trikon Technologies, Inc.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (UNAUDITED)
(In thousands, except share and per share data)
Three Months ended | Nine Months ended | ||||||||||||
September 30, | September 30, | September 30, | September 30, | ||||||||||
2003 | 2002 | 2003 | 2002 | ||||||||||
Revenues: |
|||||||||||||
Product revenues |
$ | 8,364 | $ | 4,506 | $ | 19,435 | $ | 20,968 | |||||
License revenues |
49 | | 98 | 50 | |||||||||
8,413 | 4,506 | 19,533 | 21,018 | ||||||||||
Costs and expenses: |
|||||||||||||
Cost of goods sold |
5,870 | 4,407 | 15,014 | 15,645 | |||||||||
Research and development |
2,157 | 3,239 | 6,798 | 8,060 | |||||||||
Selling, general and administrative |
4,428 | 4,361 | 14,648 | 14,195 | |||||||||
Settlement of pension liabilities and related expenses |
899 | 497 | 3,622 | 497 | |||||||||
13,354 | 12,504 | 40,082 | 38,397 | ||||||||||
Loss from operations |
(4,941 | ) | (7,998 | ) | (20,549 | ) | (17,379 | ) | |||||
Foreign currency (losses) gains |
(55 | ) | 246 | 100 | (413 | ) | |||||||
Interest (expense) income, net |
(165 | ) | 42 | 45 | 60 | ||||||||
Loss before income tax charge (credit) |
(5,161 | ) | (7,710 | ) | (20,404 | ) | (17,732 | ) | |||||
Income tax charge (credit) |
29 | (637 | ) | 187 | (2,200 | ) | |||||||
Net loss |
$ | (5,190 | ) | $ | (7,073 | ) | $ | (20,591 | ) | $ | (15,532 | ) | |
Loss per share data: |
|||||||||||||
Basic: |
$ | (0.37 | ) | $ | (0.55 | ) | $ | (1.53 | ) | $ | (1.25 | ) | |
Diluted: |
$ | (0.37 | ) | $ | (0.55 | ) | $ | (1.53 | ) | $ | (1.25 | ) | |
Weighted average common shares used in the calculation: |
|||||||||||||
Basic: |
14,078 | 12,874 | 13,484 | 12,419 | |||||||||
Diluted: |
14,078 | 12,874 | 13,484 | 12,419 |
See Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
4
Trikon Technologies, Inc.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (UNAUDITED)
(In thousands)
Nine Months ended |
|||||||
September 30, | September 30, | ||||||
2003 | 2002 | ||||||
Operating Activities |
|||||||
Net loss. |
$ | (20,591 | ) | $ | (15,532 | ) | |
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities: |
|||||||
Depreciation and amortization of property plant and equipment |
3,671 | 3,844 | |||||
Amortization of deferred compensation |
569 | 1,138 | |||||
Loss (gain) on disposal of property plant and equipment |
9 | (8 | ) | ||||
Provision for gain (loss) on accounts receivable |
46 | (147 | ) | ||||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: |
|||||||
Accounts receivable |
(1,399 | ) | 12,910 | ||||
Inventories (including demonstration systems) |
3,100 | (3,225 | ) | ||||
Other current assets |
(172 | ) | (956 | ) | |||
Accounts payable and other liabilities |
403 | 521 | |||||
Income tax payable |
| (1,585 | ) | ||||
Pension obligations |
2,117 | (1,760 | ) | ||||
Deferred revenue |
1,138 | (3,672 | ) | ||||
Net cash used in operating activities |
(11,109 | ) | (8,472 | ) | |||
Investing Activities |
|||||||
Purchases of property, equipment and leasehold improvements |
(650 | ) | (1,907 | ) | |||
Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment |
| 60 | |||||
Other assets and liabilities |
(78 | ) | 275 | ||||
Net cash used in investing activities |
(728 | ) | (1,572 | ) | |||
Financing Activities |
|||||||
Issuance of common stock |
100 | 11,808 | |||||
Repayments under bank credit lines |
(6,113 | ) | (5,817 | ) | |||
Payments on capital lease obligations |
(522 | ) | (449 | ) | |||
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities |
(6,535 | ) | 5,542 | ||||
Effect of exchange rate changes in cash |
940 | 3,746 | |||||
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents |
(17,432 | ) | (756 | ) | |||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
42,557 | 44,667 | |||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
$ | 25,125 | $ | 43,911 | |||
See Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
5
Trikon Technologies, Inc.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
September 30, 2003
NOTE A BASIS
OF PRESENTATION
|
The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Trikon Technologies, Inc. (the Company) and its subsidiaries. All material intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated. The condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all the information and footnotes required by generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring adjustments) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. The operating results for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2003 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2003.
The balance sheet at December 31, 2002 has been derived from the audited consolidated financial statements at that date, but does not include all of the information and footnotes required by generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements. For further information, refer to the consolidated financial statements and footnotes thereto included in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002.
Commencing in the first quarter of fiscal 2003 the Company has identified, on the face of the statement of operations, foreign currency gains and losses as a separate item after income/loss from operations but before income/loss before tax in the current period. Certain prior-year amounts have been reclassified to conform to current-year presentation.
NOTE B RECENT
ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
|
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. (SFAS) 143, Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations, addresses the accounting for obligations associated with the retirement of tangible long-lived assets and the associated asset retirement costs. This statement is effective for financial years commencing after June 15, 2002 and the adoption of this statement did not have a material effect on the Companys financial position or results of operations.
In June 2002, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued SFAS No. 146, Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities. The statement changes the measurement and timing of recognition for exit costs, including restructuring charges, and is effective for any such activities initiated after December 31, 2002. It has no effect on charges recorded for exit activities begun prior to December 31, 2002. The adoption of this statement did not have an effect on the Companys financial position or results of operations.
SFAS No. 148, Accounting for Stock Based Compensation Transition and Disclosure amends SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, and provides for additional disclosures relating to the pro forma effects of fair value based accounting when accounting is based upon the provisions of APB Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees. The Company has included the additional disclosures required by this standard in note I to these condensed financial statements.
In April 2003, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 149 (SFAS 149), Amendment of Statement 133 on Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities. This statement amends SFAS 133 to provide clarification on the financial accounting and reporting of derivative instruments and hedging activities and requires contracts with similar characteristics to be accounted for on a comparable basis. The adoption of this statement did not have an effect on the Companys financial position or results of operations.
6
In May 2003, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 150 (SFAS 150), Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Characteristics of both Liabilities and Equity. SFAS 150 establishes standards on the classification and measurement of financial instruments with characteristics of both liabilities and equity. SFAS 150 is effective for financial instruments entered into or modified after May 31, 2003. The Company does not expect the adoption of this statement to have a material effect on the Companys financial position or results of operations.
In November 2002, the FASB issued Financial Interpretation No. 45 (FIN 45) Guarantors Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others. This Interpretation elaborates on the disclosures to be made by a guarantor in its interim and annual financial statements about its obligations under certain guarantees that it has issued. It also clarifies that a guarantor is required to recognize, at the inception of a guarantee, a liability for the fair value of the obligation undertaken in issuing the guarantee. For product warranties, instead of disclosing the maximum potential amount of future payments under the guarantee, a guarantor is required to disclose its accounting policy and methodology used in determining its liability for product warranties as well as a tabular reconciliation of the changes in the guarantors product warranty liability for the reporting period. The Company has included the additional disclosures required by this interpretation in note D to these condensed financial statements.
In November 2002, the Emerging Issues Task Force reached a consensus on Issue No. 00-21 (EITF 00-21). Revenue Arrangements with Multiple Deliverables. EITF 00-21 provides guidance on accounting for arrangements that involve the delivery of performance of multiple products, services and/or rights to use assets and which applies to revenue arrangements beginning in this fiscal quarter of 2003. The Company does not expect the adoption of this statement to have a material effect on the Companys financial position or results of operations.
NOTE C INVENTORIES
|
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost (first-in, first-out method) or market value. The components of inventory consist of the following:
September 30, | December 31, | ||||||
2003 | 2002 | ||||||
$000
|
$000
|
||||||
Customer
service spares
|
$ | 2,864 | $ | 4,327 | |||
Components
|
7,127 | 7,878 | |||||
Work
in process
|
7,561 | 7,065 | |||||
Finished
goods
|
| 1,216 | |||||
$ | 17,552 | $ | 20,486 | ||||
7
NOTE D LIABILITIES
|
The components of other current liabilities are as follows:
September 30, | December 31, | ||||||
2003 | 2002 | ||||||
$000
|
$000
|
||||||
Warranty
and related expenses
|
$ | 1,038 | $ | 1,426 | |||
Customer
deposits
|
1,080 | 2,403 | |||||
Payroll
taxes
|
1,170 | 667 | |||||
Income
taxes
|
101 | 164 | |||||
Other
|
869 | 628 | |||||
Total
|
$ | 4,258 | $ | 5,288 | |||
Generally the Companys products are sold with a standard warranty the period of which varies from 12 to 24 months, depending on a number of factors including the specific equipment purchased. The Company accounts for the estimated warranty cost as a charge to cost of sales at the time it recognizes revenue. The warranty cost is based upon historic product performance and is based on a rolling 12-month average historic cost per machine per warranty month outstanding.
Changes in the Companys product warranty liability during the three months ended September 30, 2003 were as follows (in thousands):
Balance,
June 30, 2003
|
$ | 971 | ||
Provisions
for warranty
|
287 | |||
Consumption
of reserves
|
(214 | ) | ||
Translation
adjustment
|
(6 | ) | ||
Balance,
September 30, 2003
|
$ | 1,038 | ||
NOTE E COMPREHENSIVE
LOSS
|
Comprehensive loss is comprised of the following:
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | ||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||
September 30, | September 30, | September 30, | September 30, | ||||||||||
2003 | 2002 | 2003 | 2002 | ||||||||||
$000 | $000 | $000 | $000 | ||||||||||
Net
loss
|
$ | (5,190 | ) | $ | (7,073 | ) | $ | (20,591 | ) | $ | (15,532 | ) | |
Pension
plan obligations
|
1,060 | 38 | 7,100 | 38 | |||||||||
Foreign
currency translation adjustments
|
151 | 981 | 1,065 | 3,537 | |||||||||
Total
|
$ | (3,979 | ) | $ | (6,054 | ) | $ | (12,426 | ) | $ | (11,957 | ) | |
Accumulated other comprehensive loss comprises:
September 30, | December 31, | ||||||
2003 | 2002 | ||||||
$000 | $000 | ||||||
Pension
plan obligations
|
120 | 7,220 | |||||
Foreign
currency translation adjustments
|
115 | 1,180 | |||||
Total
|
$ | 235 | $ | 8,400 | |||
8
NOTE F EARNINGS
PER SHARE
|
The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share:
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | ||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||
September 30, | September 30, | September 30, | September 30, | ||||||||||
2003 | 2002 | 2003 | 2002 | ||||||||||
$000 | $000 | $000 | $000 | ||||||||||
Numerator
($000):
|
|||||||||||||
Net
loss
|
$ | (5,190 | ) | $ | (7,073 | ) | $ | (20,591 | ) | $ | (15,532 | ) | |
Denominator
(thousands):
|
|||||||||||||
Weighted
average shares outstanding
|
14,078 | 14,023 | 14,048 | 13,568 | |||||||||
Restricted
stock
|
| (1,149 | ) | (564 | ) | (1,149 | ) | ||||||
Denominator
for basic earnings per share
|
14,078 | 12,874 | 13,484 | 12,419 | |||||||||
Basic and diluted earnings per share are calculated in accordance with SFAS 128, Earnings Per Share, which specifies the computation, presentation and disclosure requirements for earnings per share. The weighted-average number of shares used to calculate basic earnings per share for the nine months ended September 30, 2003 excludes on a pro rata basis 1,149,281 shares of restricted common stock issued to our Chairman of the Board in which vested on May 14, 2003. The calculation for all periods ending September 30,2002, exclude such shares.
The effect of the Companys potential issuance of common shares from the Companys stock option program and unvested restricted stock are excluded from the diluted shares calculation in accordance with SFAS 128, as they are anti-dilutive when a loss is incurred.
NOTE G PREFERRED STOCK |
The Board of Directors has the authority to issue up to 20,000,000 shares of Preferred Stock in one or more series with rights, preferences, privileges and restrictions to be determined at the Boards discretion.
NOTE H SETTLEMENT OF DEFINED BENEFIT PENSION PLAN |
During the quarter ended September 30, 2003 the Company continued to settle the liabilities of the defined benefit pension plan. Settlement charges in accordance with SFAS 88, Employers Accounting for Settlements and Curtailments of Defined Benefit Pension Plans and for Termination Benefits, of $899,000 and $3,622,000 were incurred in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2003 respectively.
Pension obligations consist of:
September 30,
|
December 31,
|
||||||
2003
|
2002
|
||||||
$000 | $000 | ||||||
Unrecognized
loss
|
120 | 7,220 | |||||
Recognized
at end of period
|
210 | (1,907 | ) | ||||
Benefit
obligation in excess of plan assets
|
$ | 330 | $ | 5,313 | |||
9
NOTE I STOCK BASED COMPENSATION EXPENSE |
The Company has estimated the fair value of the options at the date of grant using a Black-Scholes option pricing model which was developed for use in estimating the value of traded options that have no vesting restrictions and are fully transferable.
The Companys employee stock options have characteristics significantly different from those of traded options; therefore, the Black-Scholes option-pricing model may not provide a reliable measure of the fair value of the Companys options. If compensation expense had been determined based on the grant date fair value as computed under the Black-Scholes option pricing model for awards in the three and nine month periods ending September 30, 2002 and 2003 in accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 123 and SFAS No. 148, the Companys net result and earnings per share would have been reduced to the pro forma amounts indicated below:
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | ||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||
September 30, | September 30, | September 30, | September 30, | ||||||||||
2003 | 2002 | 2003 | 2002 | ||||||||||
$000 | $000 | $000 | $000 | ||||||||||
Net
loss as reported
|
$ | (5,190 | ) | $ | (7,073 | ) | $ | (20,591 | ) | $ | (15,532 | ) | |
Compensation
expense included in determination of reported net
|
| | | | |||||||||
Pro
forma compensation expense calculated on the fair value method.
|
(344 | ) | (395 | ) | (1,013 | ) | (1,071 | ) | |||||
Pro
forma net loss.
|
$ | (5,534 | ) | $ | (7,468 | ) | $ | (21,604 | ) | $ | (16,603 | ) | |
Pro
forma loss per common share:
|
|||||||||||||
Basic
|
$ | (0.39 | ) | $ | (0.58 | ) | $ | (1.60 | ) | $ | (1.34) | ||
Diluted
|
$ | (0.39 | ) | $ | (0.58 | ) | $ | (1.60 | ) | $ | (1.34) |
NOTE J POST BALANCE SHEET EVENT |
On October 22, 2003 the Company completed the sale of 1,400,000 shares of its common stock with 350,000 warrants to purchase common stock with an exercise price of $6.25 per share for net proceeds of approximately $6.5 million in cash. The securities were issued to an institutional investor and its affiliated funds in a private offering pursuant to Regulation D of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. In connection with this transaction warrants to purchase 52,500 common shares with an exercise price of $6.50 were issued to the placement agent Oppenheimer & Company.
10
The following Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations should be read in conjunction with our condensed consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included elsewhere in this Report. This discussion contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The forward-looking statements included herein and any expectations based on such forward-looking statements are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially. Factors that could cause actual results to differ materially include, without limitation, the length and severity of the continuing downturn in the semiconductor industry, the long sales cycle and implementation periods for Trikons systems, the acceptance of Trikons technologies and products, Trikons ability to respond to technological change, Trikons dependence on a limited number of customers and other factors such as those set forth below under the heading Risk Factors and the other risks and uncertainties described from time to time in our public announcements and SEC filings, including, without limitation, our Quarterly and Annual Reports on Form 10-Q and 10-K, respectively.
OVERVIEW |
We design, manufacture, market and sell advanced production equipment used to process semiconductor wafers for the manufacture of integrated circuits. These circuits and devices are key components in most advanced electronic products, such as telecommunications devices, consumer and industrial electronics and computers.
Our products carry out processes to clean and add or remove materials at the surface of a wafer. In particular our products are used for chemical vapor deposition (CVD), physical vapor deposition (PVD) and plasma etch processes. We sell, install and service our systems to semiconductor manufacturers worldwide and our existing customers include a wide range of semiconductor companies, including large independent device makers. We use a direct sales model in all of our markets except in Asia, where we use a combination of direct sales and distributors.
Our mission is to profitably service our customer needs by developing product which meets their needs in a timely manner, executing our sales and marketing strategy, flawless execution of our value chain milestones and servicing our customers to a level second to none.
SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES |
General |
Our discussion and analysis of the financial condition and results of operations are based upon our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with United States generally accepted accounting principles. The preparation of these statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amount of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses. On an ongoing basis, management evaluates its estimates and judgments, including those related to bad debts, inventories, income taxes, and warranty and installation obligations. We base our estimates and judgments on historical experience and on various other factors which we believe to be reasonable in the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. We consider our accounting policies related to revenue recognition, foreign currency translation, the valuation of inventories including demonstration inventory and accounting for the costs of installation and warranty obligations to be critical accounting policies due to the estimation process included in each such policy.
Revenue Recognition |
We recognize revenues from equipment sales when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, the price of the goods and services being sold is fixed or determinable, delivery has occurred or services rendered and we are reasonably assured that we will collect payment. Generally, we recognize revenue on shipment, as the equipment is pre-tested in the factory prior to shipment and our terms of business are FOB factory. For
11
new customers, or new products, revenue is recognized on shipment only if the customer attends and approves the pre-shipment testing procedures and we, and the customer, are satisfied that the performance of the equipment, once installed and operated, will meet the customer-defined specifications. Generally even with new customers we recognize the revenue on shipment because the customer attends and approves the pre-shipment testing. The amount of revenue recorded is reduced by the amount of any customer retention (typically between 10% and 20%), which is not payable by the customer until installation is completed and final customer acceptance is achieved. The amount of system shipments and customer retentions deferred at September 30, 2003 was $2.3 million compared to $1.2 million at December 31, 2002. The provision of installation and commissioning services are not considered essential to the functionality of the equipment.
Equipment sold as demonstration or evaluation units are recognized as revenue on transfer of title and either final acceptance, or satisfactory completion of testing to demonstrate that the equipment meets all the customer defined specifications.
Revenue related to spare parts is recognized on shipment. Revenue related to service contracts is recognized ratably over the duration of the contracts.
Foreign Currency Translation |
Most of our operations are located within the United Kingdom and most of our costs are incurred in British pounds. However our system sales are generally in US dollars and, to a lesser extent, in euro and we report in US dollars. As a result, fluctuations in the exchange rate between the US dollar and the British pound have a significant effect on our reported earnings and net asset position. We have determined that the functional currency for all UK operations is the British pound and as a result our actual expenses expressed in US dollars will fluctuate with changes in foreign currency exchange rates and result in currency gains and losses, which are charged to net income. Changes in the value of non-US net assets as a result of these movements of foreign currency exchange rates are treated as changes to the cumulative translation adjustment on the balance sheet.
Inventory valuation |
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or net realizable value, using standard costs which approximate to actual cost. We maintain a perpetual inventory system and continuously record the quantity on hand and standard cost of each product including purchased components sub assemblies and finished goods. We maintain the integrity of the perpetual inventory through a cycle stock count program. Our standard costs are re-assessed at least annually and generally reflect the most recent purchase cost and currently achievable assembly and test labor and overhead rates. We estimate our labor and overhead rates based upon average utilization rates and treat as a period cost abnormal absorption variances, which arise due to low or high production volumes. In the current industry downturn, and low levels of production, significant negative volume variances are being experienced, which has resulted in the lower gross margin as compared to the prior year.
We also make provision for slow moving and obsolete inventory and evaluate their adequacy on a quarterly basis. For our work in process and finished goods inventory, which generally consist of specific systems or modules, we compare the inventory on hand to current sales and market forecasts and other information that indicates the ability to identify a purchaser for such equipment. We apply a formula approach to reserves against raw materials and spares inventory based upon 12 months historic usage, applying different criteria to components that are required for current products, non current products and spares.
A major component of the estimate of inventory reserves is our estimate related to future customer demand, technological and or market obsolescence, the equipment operating life at the customer and general semiconductor market conditions. If future customer demand or market conditions are less favorable than our projections then additional inventory write-downs may be required, and these would be reflected in cost of sales in the period the reserves were adjusted.
12
Installation and Warranty |
Our contracts cover on-site installation services and provide for a warranty of the machine. Generally we accrue for the costs of installation and commissioning services at the time of revenue recognition. Our standard warranty period varies from 12 to 24 months, depending on a number of factors including the specific equipment purchased. We account for the estimated warranty cost as a charge to cost of sales at the time we recognize revenue. The warranty cost is based upon historic product performance and is based on a rolling 12-month average historic cost per machine per warranty month outstanding. We also recalculate the warranty liability for all remaining systems still under warranty using the most recent historic average and the difference is included as a component of cost of sales. We do not maintain any general reserves for warranty obligations. Actual performance in the future may vary from historic costs, including the identification of defects not currently identified, which could result in adjustments to our warranty reserves in future periods that are more volatile than in recent years.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS |
The following table sets forth certain operating data as a percentage of total revenue for the periods indicated:
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | ||||||||||||
September 30, | September 30, | September 30, | September 30, | ||||||||||
2003 | 2002 | 2003 | 2002 | ||||||||||
Product revenues |
99.4 | % | 100.0 | % | 99.5 | % | 99.8 | % | |||||
Licence revenue |
0.6 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 0.2 | |||||||||
Total revenue |
100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | |||||||||
Cost of goods sold |
69.8 | 97.8 | 76.9 | 74.4 | |||||||||
Gross margin |
30.2 | 2.2 | 23.1 | 25.6 | |||||||||
Operating expenses: |
|||||||||||||
Research and development |
25.6 | 71.9 | 34.8 | 38.3 | |||||||||
Selling, general and administrative |
52.6 | 96.8 | 75.0 | 67.6 | |||||||||
Pension liability settlement and other related charges |
10.7 | 11.0 | 18.5 | 2.3 | |||||||||
Total operating expenses |
88.9 | 179.7 | 128.3 | 108.2 | |||||||||
Loss from operations |
(58.8 | ) | (177.5 | ) | (105.2 | ) | (82.6) | ||||||
Foreign currency (losses) gains |
(0.7 | ) | 5.5 | 0.5 | (2.0) | ||||||||
Interest (expense) income, net |
(2.0 | ) | 0.9 | 0.2 | 0.3 | ||||||||
Loss before income tax (charge) credit |
(61.5 | ) | (171.1 | ) | (104.5 | ) | (84.3) | ||||||
Income tax (charge) credit |
(0.3 | ) | 14.1 | (0.9 | ) | 10.4 | |||||||
Net loss |
(61.8) | % | (157.0 | )% | (105.4 | )% | (73.9 | )% | |||||
PRODUCT SALES. Product revenues for the three months ended September 30, 2003 increased 86% to $8.4 million compared to $4.5 million for the three months ended September 30, 2002 and product revenues for the nine months ended September 30, 2003 decreased 7% to $19.4 million compared to $21.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2002. Shipments for the three months ended September 30, 2003 were $9.1 million compared to $4.7 million in the third quarter of the prior year and for the nine months ended September 30, 2003 were $20.7 million compared to $17.4 million for the prior year.
Because of the large unit price associated with our systems, our product sales are represented by a small number of unit sales in each quarter and therefore the quantity of product shipped can fluctuate significantly from quarter to quarter and the individual customers to whom these products are sold can also change from quarter to quarter.
13
Sales outside of the United States accounted for approximately 81% and 75% of total revenues in the three month periods ended September 30, 2003 and September 30, 2002, respectively, and approximately 64% and 63% of total revenues in the nine-month periods ended September 30, 2003 and September 30, 2002, respectively. We expect that sales outside of the United States will continue to represent a significant percentage of our product sales.
Our sales by product are as follows:
Three Months Ended September 30, |
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
||||||||||||
2003 | 2002 | 2003 | 2002 | ||||||||||
PVD |
25 | % | 11 | % | 13 | % | 38 | % | |||||
CVD |
4 | % | 14 | % | 27 | % | 7 | % | |||||
Etch |
40 | % | 19 | % | 19 | % | 24 | % | |||||
Spares and service |
31 | % | 56 | % | 41 | % | 31 | % | |||||
Total |
100 | % | 100 | % | 100 | % | 100 | % | |||||
LICENSE REVENUES. License revenues are in respect of an exclusive license of power supply technology and a non exclusive license of our Mori technology to a systems integrator in Japan for a non competing application. License revenues relating to power supply technology of $65,000 for the nine month period ended September 30, 2003 increased 30% compared to $50,000 received during the same period in 2002. License revenues are expected to continue to represent a small part of our income.
GROSS MARGIN. The gross margin on product revenues for the three month period ended September 30, 2003 was 30.1% as compared to 2.2% for the three month period ended September 30, 2002. The improved gross margin is attributable to the combination of higher revenue levels, lower costs as a result of our cost reduction program completed in the second quarter of fiscal 2003 and movements in provisions against the carrying value of inventory with a release of $56,000 in the three months ended September 30, 2003 compared to a charge of $458,000 in the three months ended September 30, 2003. The release and charges were made in accordance with our normal accounting policy.
The gross margin on product revenues for the nine month period ended September 30, 2003 was 23.1% compared with 25.6% for the nine months ended September 30, 2002. The lower gross margin in the nine month period results from the effect of the fixed costs of our manufacturing and customer support organizations compared to lower revenues. Provisions against the carrying value of inventory in the nine-month period ended September 30, 2003 was $782,000 compared to $1,105,000 in the prior year
We continue to expect our gross margin to continue to reflect the fixed costs of our manufacturing and customer support organizations and will therefore fluctuate based upon actual revenue
RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT EXPENSES. Research and development expenses for the three months ended September 30, 2003 were $2.2 million or 25.6% of total revenues compared with $3.2 million or 71.9% of total revenues for the three months ended September 30, 2002. For the nine months ended September 30, 2003, research and development expenses were $6.8 million or 34.8% of total revenues compared with $8.1 million or 38.3% of total revenues for the nine months ended September 30, 2002. While the decrease in research and development expenses for the third quarter reflects reduced headcount and other expenses as we actively manage our expenditure, we continue to invest significant resources as a result of our commitment to technology development. The third quarter of 2002 includes abnormal material costs of $270,000 relating to one off 300mm wafer development work which are not incurred in the current period. The major focus of our research and development efforts continues to be the development of new processes in further advancing our proprietary PVD, CVD and etch technologies, especially the development of our low k technology, as well as adding enhancements to our existing products.
14
SELLING, GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES. Selling, general and administrative expenses for the three months ended September 30, 2003 were $4.4 million, or 52.6% of total revenues, compared to $4.4 million, or 96.8% of total revenues, in the three months ended September 30, 2002. For the nine months ended September 30, 2003 selling, general and administrative expenses were $14.7 million, or 75% of total revenues, compared to $14.2 million, or 67.6% of total revenues, in the nine months ended September 30, 2002.
RESULT FROM OPERATIONS. We incurred a loss from operations of $4.9 million in the three months ended September 30, 2003 compared to a loss of $8.0 million in the three months ended September 30, 2002. Higher revenue and reduced costs were the major components of the reduction in the loss from operations. We incurred a loss of $20.5 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2003, compared to a loss from operations of $17.4 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2002. The pension settlement charge of $899,000 and $3,622,000 in the three and nine month period ended September 30, 2003 has had a significant affect upon the result of operations for those periods.
INTEREST INCOME (EXPENSE), NET. Net interest expense was $165,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2003 compared with net interest income of $42,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2002. During the nine months ended September 30, 2003 net interest income was $45,000 compared to net interest income of $60,000 in the nine months ended September 30, 2003. Interest expense in the three month period ended September 30, 2003 includes interest payable on taxes outstanding from prior years, which are to be settled in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2003.
INCOME TAXES. For the three months ended September 30, 2003, we recorded a tax charge of $29,000 compared with a tax credit of $637,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2002. For the nine months ended September 30, 2003, we recorded a tax charge of $187,000 compared with a tax credit of $2.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2002. The tax credit in the prior year arose from the ability in the prior year to recover taxes paid in the prior year whereas in the current year the losses are only recoverable against future profits. We expect to report a small tax charge for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2003 which will consist solely of foreign taxes for which no carry forward net operating losses are available. In estimating the tax rate for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2003, we have not provided any benefit for the deferred tax asset arising from operating losses generated that can only be offset against future profits.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES |
At September 30, 2003, we had $25.1 million in cash and cash equivalents, compared to $42.6 million at December 31, 2002. The primary use of cash in the nine months ended September 30, 2003 was operations, which used $11.1 million. In addition we invested $0.7 million in property, plant and equipment and repaid $6.1 million of our term loan facility with a British bank and leasing obligations of $0.5 million. In addition, currency translation adjustments resulted in a $0.9 million increase in our cash and cash equivalents at September 30, 2003.
As at September 30, 2003, we had a term loan from a British bank with a balance outstanding of 7.5 million British pounds compared to 11.2 million British pounds at December 31, 2002 (approximately $12.5 million and $18.0 million, respectively at the respective period end exchange rates). The term loan at September 30, 2003 bears interest at the London Interbank Borrowing Rate (LIBOR) plus 1.25% (presently payable at the rate of 4.93%) per annum and also carries no prepayment penalties. This term loan is repayable as two payments of approximately $2.1 million in October 2003 and January 2004 and a final repayment of $8.3 million in March 2004.
In July 2003 we entered into a two-year revolving credit facility for 5 million British pounds (approximately $8.3 million at September 30, 2003 exchange rate) (new facility). Interest on the new facility, will be incurred at the London Interbank rate (LIBOR) plus 1.75% for borrowings in British pounds and foreign currency at the Banks short-term offered rate plus 1%. No amounts are outstanding under this facility on September 30, 2003.
15
The new facility includes financial covenants that require we maintain a consolidated net worth of not less than $45 million, and that our interest expense on the loan does not exceed 70,000 British pounds in any one fiscal quarter. Based upon the exchange rate as at September 30, 2003 this covenant does not restrict our ability to use this facility. The financial covenants on the existing facility continue but due to the scheduled repayment of this facility during the next six months any breach would not affect the repayment date.
In October 2003 the Company completed the sale of 1,400,000 shares of its common stock with 350,000 warrants to purchase common stock with an exercise price of $6.25 per share for net proceeds of approximately $6.5 million in cash. The securities were issued to an institutional investor and its affiliated funds in a private offering pursuant to regulation D of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.
Our cash balance of $25.1 million combined with cash received from the sale of 1.4 million shares and our new facility will be the primary sources of liquidity for the company. We will use part of our cash balance to to repay our 7.5 million British pounds term loan during the next six months and we will also use our cash reserves to fund our operations until such time as we can increase our revenue or reduce our costs to achieve a profitable operation on an ongoing basis. This will depend upon how long the current continuing difficult market conditions in the semiconductor equipment industry lasts and our ability to grow revenue despite these conditions. However, we believe that our current cash balances, the proceeds from the sale of shares and our new facility will be sufficient to fund our operations for at least the next 12 months.
RISK FACTORS |
The semiconductor industry is experiencing a protracted and continuing downturn, which has harmed and may continue to harm our sales and profitability. |
We sell our products to the semiconductor industry, which is subject to sudden variations in product supply and demand. The industry is experiencing a protracted and continuing downturn at this time, the length and severity of which is difficult to estimate, but the downturn has continued to date and may continue well into 2004. Management believes it is still unclear as to when conditions in the industry may improve. Our sales and revenues have been harmed significantly by the current downturn. Even after the current downturn ends there can be no assurance that orders and sales will return to historical levels.
Generally, the timing, length and severity of the cycles in the semiconductor industry are difficult to predict. Semiconductor manufacturers may contribute to these cycles by misinterpreting conditions in the industry and over- or under-investing in semiconductor manufacturing capacity and equipment. We have little ability to anticipate or respond effectively to these industry cycles.
Downturns in the semiconductor industry often occur in connection with, or anticipation of, maturing product cycles for both semiconductor companies and their customers and declines in general economic conditions. Industry downturns have been characterized by reduced demand for semiconductor devices and equipment, production over-capacity and accelerated declines in average selling prices. During a period of declining demand, to maintain our profitability, we must be able to quickly and effectively reduce expenses and motivate and retain key employees. Many of our expenses are fixed and our ability to reduce other expenses in response to any downturn in the semiconductor industry is limited by our need for continued investment in engineering and research and development and extensive ongoing customer service and support requirements. During fiscal 2001 and 2002 and continuing in fiscal 2003, we have reduced our expenses, but our ability to continue to cut costs without reducing the scope of our business is limited.
In addition, the long lead time for production and delivery of our products, and the possibility of customer order cancellations, creates a risk that we may incur expenditures or purchase inventories for products which we cannot sell.
At the time the current downturn ends, we may not be in a position to meet our customers needs. Industry upturns have been characterized by abrupt increases in demand for semiconductor devices and equipment and production under-capacity. During a period of increasing demand and rapid growth, we must be able to quickly hire, train and assimilate a sufficient number of qualified personnel, particularly engineers, and obtain sufficient components in order to increase production to meet customer demand. If we are unable to increase production on a timely basis in times of increased demand some of our existing or potential customers could place orders with our competitors and, as a result we may not be able to fully benefit from any industry upturn.
16
We will not be able to compete effectively if we fail to address the rapid technological change in the semiconductor industry. |
The semiconductor industry and the semiconductor equipment industry are subject to rapid technological change and frequent introductions of enhancements to existing products, and if we are unable to develop and incorporate new technologies in our products, we will be unable to compete effectively and our business will be materially and adversely affected. Technological trends have had and will continue to have a significant impact on our business. Our results of operations and ability to remain competitive are largely based upon our ability to accurately anticipate customer and market requirements. Accordingly, we may be required to maintain a relatively high level of research and development spending, even at time of declining sales and profitability, in order to maintain our competitive position.
Our success in developing, introducing and selling new and enhanced products depends upon a variety of factors, including:
| timely and efficient completion of product design and development; |
| timely and efficient implementation of manufacturing and assembly processes; |
| effective sales and marketing; |
| product performance in the field; and |
| product support and service. |
We may not be able to accurately forecast or respond to commercial and technical trends in the semiconductor industry or respond to specific product announcements by our competitors. Our competitors may be developing technologies and products that are more effective or that achieve more widespread acceptance. In addition, we may incur substantial costs to ensure the functionality and reliability of our current and future products. If our products are unreliable or do not meet our customers expectations, then reduced orders, higher manufacturing costs, delays in collecting accounts receivable or additional service and warranty expense could result. Our customers may purchase equipment for their new products but experience delays and technical and manufacturing difficulties in their introductions or transition to volume production using our systems causing significant delays between the sale of an initial tool into our customers development facility and potential follow on sales for manufacturing. Any of these events could negatively affect our ability to generate the return we expect to achieve on our investments in these new products.
We expect the semiconductor industry to further migrate to the use of copper and will need to continue to adapt our products for use with copper and copper processes. If we fail to make our products compatible with copper and copper processes at the time our competitors offer copper compatible products, our revenues and market share will be negatively affected.
The semiconductor industry also has historically moved to larger diameter wafers requiring new equipment as a strategy to reduce manufacturing costs. The maximum diameter of silicon wafers used in production is increasing from 200mm to 300mm. While we have already shipped 300mm systems for our CVD products, we continue to develop the technology and solutions for our PVD and etch systems. There can be no assurance, however, that we will be able to complete the development of 300mm systems for our PVD and etch systems in time to meet market demand. If our current products and our 300mm systems for our PVD and etch systems are not competitive or available at the correct time, we may lose customers or fail to gain new business from potential customers, which would have a material adverse effect on our revenues and net earnings.
We believe that our technology for the deposition of low k dielectrics is advanced compared to our competitors and we are dedicating significant resources to continue to lead in this field and to achieve the commercial sales of our low k systems. However, the physical characteristics of low k films make the manufacturing process significantly more difficult than with existing insulating materials and, as a result, device manufacturers have been slow to adopt the use of low k materials and this adoption has been delayed during the current downturn. Device manufacturers continue to find alternative methods to manufacture devices at smaller feature sizes, and forgo the development and use of low k materials. Also, there can be no assurance that the industry will adopt a CVD method for the deposition of low k films. Other technologies for which we do not manufacture equipment could also be used for the deposition of low k films. If we fail to continue to develop our low k CVD solution to achieve all the specifications required by device manufacturers, or our competitors develop competing low k solutions, then our ability to grow our revenues and market share from these products would be negatively affected.
17
Our operational results could be negatively affected by currency fluctuations. |
We are based in the United Kingdom, and most of our operating expenses are incurred in British pounds. Our revenues, however, are generally denominated in US dollars, and to a lesser extent in euros, and we report our financial results in US dollars. Accordingly, if the British pound increases in value against the US dollar, our expenses as a percentage of revenues will increase and gross margins and net income will be negatively affected.
Our competitors have greater financial resources and greater name recognition than we do and therefore may compete more successfully. |
We face competition or potential competition from many companies with greater resources than ours. If we are unable to compete effectively with these companies, our market share may decline and our business could be harmed.
Virtually all of our primary competitors are substantially larger companies and some of them have broader product lines than ours. They have well established reputations in the markets in which we compete, greater experience with high volume manufacturing, broader name recognition, substantially larger customer bases, and substantially greater financial, technical, manufacturing and marketing resources than we do. We also face potential competition from new entrants, including established manufacturers in other segments of the semiconductor capital equipment market who may decide to diversify into our market segments of CVD, PVD and plasma etch.
Semiconductor manufacturers are loyal to their current semiconductor equipment supplier, which may make it difficult for us to obtain new customers. |
We believe that once a semiconductor manufacturer has selected a suppliers equipment for a particular fabrication line, the manufacturer often will continue to rely on that suppliers equipment for future requirements, including new generations of similar products. If we are unable to sell our products to potential customers who currently are using other suppliers equipment, it could be difficult for us to increase our revenues or market share. Changing from one equipment supplier to another may be expensive and may require a substantial investment of resources by the customer. Accordingly, we may experience difficulty in achieving significant sales to a customer using another suppliers equipment. At the same time, however, we cannot assure you that our existing customers will continue to use our equipment in the future.
Our products generally have long sales cycles and implementation periods, which increase our costs of obtaining orders and reduce the predictability of our earnings. |
Our products are technologically complex. Prospective customers generally must commit significant resources to test and evaluate our products and to install and integrate them into larger systems. In addition, customers often require a significant number of product presentations and demonstrations, in some instances evaluating equipment on site, before reaching a sufficient level of confidence in the products performance and compatibility with their requirements to place an order. As a result, our sales process is often subject to delays associated with lengthy approval processes that typically accompany the design and testing of new products. The sales cycles of our products often last for many months or even years. Longer sales cycles require us to invest significant resources in attempting to make sales and delay the generation of revenue. In addition, we may incur significant costs in supporting evaluation equipment at our customers facilities.
18
Long sales cycles also subject us to other risks, including customers budgetary constraints, internal acceptance reviews and cancellations. In addition, orders expected in one quarter could shift to another because of the timing of customers purchase decisions. The time required for our customers to incorporate our products into their manufacturing processes can vary significantly with the needs of our customers and generally exceeds several months, which further complicates our planning processes and reduces the predictability of our operating results.
We depend upon sole suppliers for certain key components. |
We depend on a number of sole suppliers for key components used in the manufacture of our products. If we are unable to obtain timely delivery of sufficient quantities of these components, we would be unable to manufacture our products to meet customer demand, unless we are able to locate replacement components. Most significantly, our Sigma® fxP™, Planar™ fxP™ and Omega™ fxP™ systems are designed around an automation module supplied by Brooks Automation. Due to the high cost of these modules we keep very few in inventory. If Brooks Automation fails to deliver the component on a timely basis, delivery of our Sigma® fxP™, Planar™ fxP™ and Omega™ fxP™ systems will be delayed and sales may be lost. If Brooks Automation is unable to deliver any such modules for a prolonged period of time, we will have to redesign our Sigma® fxP™ and Planar™ fxP™ systems so that we may utilize other wafer transport systems. There can be no assurance that we will be able to do so, or that customers will adopt the redesigned systems.
Our final assembly and testing is concentrated in one facility. |
Our final assembly and testing activity is concentrated in our facility in Newport, United Kingdom. We have no alternative facilities to allow for continued production if we are required to cease production in our facility, as a result of a fire, natural disaster or otherwise. In such event, we will be unable to produce any products until the facility is replaced. Any such interruption in our manufacturing schedule could cause us to lose sales and customers.
If we are unable to hire and retain a sufficient number of qualified personnel, our ability to manage growth will be negatively affected. |
Our business and future operating results depend in part upon our ability to attract and retain qualified management, technical, sales and support personnel for our operations on a worldwide basis. Competition for qualified personnel is intense, and we cannot guarantee that we will be able to continue to attract and retain qualified personnel. Our operations could be negatively affected if we lose key executives or employees or are unable to attract and retain skilled executives and employees as needed.
Our ability to compete could be jeopardized if we are unable to protect our intellectual property rights from challenges by third parties. |
Our success and ability to compete depend in large part upon protecting our proprietary technology. We rely on a combination of patent, trade secret, copyright and trademark laws, non-disclosure and other contractual agreements and technical measures to protect our proprietary rights.
There can be no assurance that patents will be issued on our pending patent applications or that competitors will not be able to ascertain legitimately proprietary information embedded in our products that is not covered by patent or copyright. In such case, we may be precluded from preventing the competitor from making use of such information. In addition, should we wish to assert our patent rights against a particular competitors product, there can be no assurance that any claim in any of our patents will be sufficiently broad nor, if sufficiently broad, any assurance that our patent will not be challenged, invalidated or circumvented, or that we will have sufficient resources to prosecute our rights.
19
Claims or litigation regarding intellectual property rights could seriously harm our business or require us to incur significant costs. |
In recent years, there has been significant litigation in the United States in the semiconductor equipment industry involving patents and other intellectual property rights. Infringement claims may be asserted against us in the future and, if such claims are made, we may not be able to defend against such claims successfully or, if necessary, obtain licenses on reasonable terms. Any claim that our products infringe proprietary rights of others would force us to defend ourselves and possibly our customers against the alleged infringement. These claims and any resulting lawsuit, if successful, could subject us to significant liability for damages and invalidation of our proprietary rights. These lawsuits, regardless of their outcome, would likely be time-consuming and expensive to resolve and would divert management time and attention. Any potential intellectual property litigation could force us to do one or more of the following:
| lose or forfeit our proprietary rights; |
| stop manufacturing or selling our products that incorporate the challenged intellectual property; |
| obtain from the owner of the infringed intellectual property right a license to sell or use the relevant technology, which license may not be available on reasonable terms or at all and may involve significant royalty payments; |
| pay damages, including treble damages and attorneys fees in some circumstances; or |
| redesign those products that use the challenged intellectual property. |
If we are forced to take any of the foregoing actions, our business could be severely harmed.
We derive a significant portion of our quarterly bookings and revenue from sales to a small number of customers. A delay in, or loss of, a single sale for any reason could cause our quarterly operating results and operating metrics to materially suffer, which could cause
the trading price of our stock to decline, perhaps significantly. |
We derive a substantial portion of our quarterly bookings from the sale of a small number of high unit value systems. Similarly, a significant portion of quarterly revenue is recognized upon shipment of a small number of high value systems. As a result, a delay in or loss of a single sale, or a delay in a single shipment, could materially adversely affect our operating results or operating metrics for a given quarter. The potential volatility in our operating results and operating metrics makes it likely that, in a future quarter, our operating results or operating metrics will be below expectations of investors and financial analysts, which could have an adverse effect on the trading price of our common stock.
In addition, our product sales generally have been highly concentrated with a small number of key customers. We may not be able to retain our key customers or these customers may cancel purchase orders or otherwise decrease their level of purchases from us. Any reduction in the amount of orders from, or sales to, one or more of our key customers could significantly harm our operating results and operating metrics, which could, in turn, have an adverse effect on the trading price of our common stock.
Our operations are subject to health and safety and environmental laws that may expose us to liabilities for noncompliance. |
We are subject to a variety of governmental regulations relating to the use, storage, discharge, handling, manufacture and disposal of all materials present at, or our output from, our facilities, including the toxic or other hazardous chemical by-products of our manufacturing processes. Environmental claims against us or our failure to comply with any present or future regulations could result in:
| the assessment of damages or imposition of fines against us; |
| the suspension of production of our products; or |
| the cessation of our operations. |
20
New regulations could require us to purchase costly equipment or to incur other significant expenses. Our failure to control the use or adequately restrict the discharge of hazardous substances could subject us to future liabilities, which could negatively affect our earnings and financial position.
Any acquisitions we may make could disrupt our business and severely harm our financial condition.
From time to time, we may consider investments in complementary companies, products or technologies. In the event of any future acquisitions, we could:
| issue stock that would dilute our current stockholders percentage ownership; |
| incur debt; |
| assume liabilities; |
| incur amortization expenses related to tangible assets and other intangible assets; or |
| incur large and immediate accounting write-offs. |
Our operation of any acquired business will also involve numerous risks, including:
| problems integrating the purchased operations, technologies or products; |
| unanticipated costs and liabilities for which we are not able to obtain indemnification from the sellers; |
| diversion of managements attention from our core business; |
| adverse effects on existing business relationships with customers; |
| risks associated with entering markets in which we have no or limited prior experience; and |
| potential loss of key employees, particularly those of the purchased organizations. |
You may have difficulty protecting your rights as a stockholder and in enforcing civil liabilities because our many of our executive offices and members of our board of directors and the majority of our assets are located outside the United States. |
Our principal assets and manufacturing plants are located in the United Kingdom. In addition, most of the members of our board of directors and our executive officers are residents of jurisdictions other than the United States. As a result, it may be difficult for stockholders to serve process within the United States upon members of our board of directors and our executive officers, or to enforce against us or our members of our board of directors or our executive officers judgments of the U.S. courts, to enforce outside the United States judgments obtained against members of our board of directors or our executive officers in U.S. courts, or to enforce in U.S. courts judgments obtained against members of our board of directors or our executive officers in courts in jurisdictions outside the United States, in any action, including actions that derive from the civil liability provisions of the U.S. securities laws. In addition, it may be difficult for our stockholders to enforce, in original actions brought in courts in jurisdictions located outside the United States, liabilities that derive from U.S. securities laws.
21
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURE ABOUT MARKET RISK |
The following discussion and analysis about market risk disclosures may contain forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act and Section 21E of the Exchange Act. Such statements include declarations regarding our intent, belief or current expectations and involve risks and uncertainties. Actual results could differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements.
Our earnings and cash flow are subject to fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates. Significant factors affecting this risk include our manufacturing and administrative cost base, which is predominately in British pounds, and product sales outside the United States, which may be expressed in currencies other than the United States dollar. We constantly monitor currency exchange rates and match currency availability and requirements whenever possible. We may from time to time enter into forward foreign exchange transactions in order to minimize risk from firm future positions arising from trading. As at September 30, 2003 and December 31, 2002 we did not have any open forward currency transactions.
Based upon budgeted income and expenditures, a hypothetical increase of 10% in the value of the British pound against all other currencies in the third quarter of 2003 would have no material effect on revenues, which are primarily expressed in United States dollars and would increase operating costs and reduce cash flow by approximately $1.3 million. The same increase in the value of the British pound would increase the value of our net assets expressed in United States dollars by approximately $5.4 million. The effect of the hypothetical change in exchange rates ignores the effect this movement may have on other variables including competitive risk. If it were possible to quantify this impact, the results could well be different from the sensitivity effects shown above. In addition, it is unlikely that all currencies would uniformly strengthen or weaken relative to the British pound. In reality, some currencies may weaken while others may strengthen.
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES |
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures |
An evaluation was performed under the supervision and with the participation of our management team, including the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) and Chief Financial Officer (CFO), of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on that evaluation, our management, including the CEO and CFO, have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of September 30, 2003 to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed by us in reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in Securities and Exchange Commission rules and forms.
Changes in Internal Controls |
There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the quarter ended September 30, 2003, that materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
22
Trikon Technologies, Inc.
PART II
OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS |
As of October 28, 2003 there were no material pending legal proceedings to which we or our subsidiaries are a party. From time to time we become involved in ordinary, routine or regulatory legal proceedings incidental to our business.
ITEM 2. CHANGES IN SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS |
Not applicable.
ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UNDER SENIOR SECURITIES |
Not applicable.
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS |
None.
ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION |
None.
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K |
(a) The following exhibits are included herein:
31.1 | Certification of Chief Executive Officer required by Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a) of the Exchange Act |
31.2 | Certification of Chief Financial Officer required by Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a) of the Exchange Act |
32.1 | Certificate of Chief Executive Officer furnished pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) of the Exchange Act and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. 1350) |
32.2 | Certificate of Chief Financial Officer furnished pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) of the Exchange Act and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. 1350) |
(b) Reports on Form 8-K:
We filed a report on Form 8-K on 23rd July 2003 relating to a new revolving credit facility. |
We submitted a report on Form 8-K on 24th July 2003 furnishing a press release announcing our earnings for the second fiscal quarter of 2003. |
We filed a report on Form 8-K/A on 28th July 2003 amending the text of the form 8-K filed on 23rd July 2003. |
23
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
TRIKON TECHNOLOGIES, INC. |
|
Date: November 7, 2003 | /s/
Jihad Kiwan |
/s/
William J Chappell |
24