General and Administrative Expenses. General and administrative expenditures decreased 30% to $7.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2002 from $11.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2001. This decrease was primarily due to a $2.5 million decrease of in the amortization of deferred compensation, a decrease in bad debt expense and decreases in expensed software and legal and stock administration fees, offset by increases in business insurance.

Amortization of Deferred Compensation. In the nine months ended September 30, 2002, we recorded $2.3 million in amortization of deferred compensation as compared to $12.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2001. The decrease is primarily related to the use of the graded vesting method, which results in accelerated amortization of deferred compensation expense in the earlier years of the awards' expected life, and an adjustment in the third quarter of 2002 related to forfeited options. As required by APB25, we recorded a benefit to amortization of deferred compensation in the third quarter related to employees who forfeited options for which compensation expense had been recognized using the graded vesting method, but which were unvested on the date their employment terminated.

Amortization of Goodwill and Other Acquisition Intangibles. Amortization of goodwill and other acquisition-related intangibles decreased to $125,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2002 from $2.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2001. This was due to the implementation of SFAS 142, which required us to discontinue the amortization of goodwill effective January 1, 2002. In addition, in accordance with SFAS 142 we reclassified assembled workforce to goodwill, which eliminated the amortization of assembled workforce effective January 1, 2002.

In-Process Research and Development Expense. For the nine months ended September 30, 2001, we recorded $7.4 million in charges for in-process research and development related to the acquisition of vEngines, Inc. There were no comparable amounts for the nine months ended September 30, 2002.

Gain on Non-Current Investment. For the nine months ended September 30, 2001, as a result of an ongoing evaluation and review of our non-current equity investment, we recorded a non-cash charge of $990,000 to write down the basis of our investment to zero for impairment. In January 2002, we sold this non-current equity investment for $440,000 and have included this as a gain in the nine months ended September 30, 2002.

Interest Income. Interest income decreased 51% to $1.5 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2002 as compared to $3.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2001. This decrease was primarily due to lower interest rates obtained on our cash, cash equivalents and short-term investment portfolio and lower average invested balances.

Provision for Income Taxes. Income tax expense was $57,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2002 compared to $520,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2001. The provision for income taxes for the nine months ended September 30, 2002 relates to current taxes payable for the Company's subsidiaries located in foreign jurisdictions. The provision for income taxes for the nine months ended September 30, 2001 relates to current taxes payable for the Company's subsidiaries located in foreign jurisdictions and federal alternative minimum taxes based on projected U.S. taxable income for the fiscal year 2001. Due to the Company's loss position, a full valuation allowance has been established to reserve the Company's deferred tax assets, consisting primarily of net operating loss carryforwards.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Since our inception, we have financed our operations through a combination of sales of equity securities and cash generated by operations. At September 30, 2002, we had $97.6 million in cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments as compared to $110.9 million at December 31, 2001.

Net cash used in operating activities was $10 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2002. The net cash used in operating activities was primarily due to our net loss of $22.9 million and an increase in our accounts receivable of $3.2 million. The increase in accounts receivable was due to differences in the timing of related shipments and payments in the nine-month periods ended September 2002 and 2001, respectively. Net cash used in operating activities was offset by non-cash charges of $2.3 million for the amortization of deferred compensation, depreciation and amortization expense of $5.3 million, a decrease in inventory of $4.5 million and increases in accrued liabilities and accounts payable of $2.7 million and $1.0 million, respectively. The decrease in inventory was due to lower inventory levels required to support lower sales volumes and the increases in accrued liabilities and accounts payable were due to timing of payments.

For the nine months ended September 30, 2002, net cash provided by investing activities was $5.2 million. Net cash provided by investing activities primarily related to net sales and maturities of short-term investments of $18.6 million offset by purchases of property and equipment of $4.9 million, principally related to the purchase of software development tools, lab equipment and computer hardware to support our research and development activities.

Net cash provided by financing activities was $1.2 million for the nine month periods ended September 30, 2002. Net cash provided by financing activities primarily consisted of net proceeds of $1.4 million from employee stock plans partially offset by principal payments on long term debt obligations.

Our principal source of liquidity as of September 30, 2002 consisted of $97.6 million of cash and cash equivalents, and short-term investments. We believe our current cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities will be sufficient to meet our anticipated cash needs for working capital and capital expenditures for at least 12 months. The rate at which we will consume cash will be dependent on the cash needs of future operations which will, in turn, be directly affected by the levels of demand for our products. We expect to devote capital resources to continue our research and development efforts, to support our sales, marketing, and product development programs and to fund other general corporate activities. From time to time, we receive various inquiries or claims in connection with intellectual property and other rights and may become party to associated claims. In certain cases, management has accrued estimates of the amounts it expects to pay upon resolution of such matters. Depending on the amount and timing of the resolutions of these claims, our future cash flows could be materially adversely affected in a particular period.

If our existing resources and cash generated from operations are insufficient to satisfy our liquidity requirements, we may seek to raise additional funds through public or private debt or equity financings. The sale of equity or debt securities could result in additional dilution to our stockholders, and we cannot be certain that additional financing will be available in amounts or on terms acceptable to us, if at all. If we are unable to obtain this additional financing, we may be required to reduce the scope of our planned product development and sales and marketing efforts, which could harm our business, financial condition and operating results.

You should carefully consider the risks described below and all of the information contained in this Form 10-Q and on our Form 10-K, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 27, 2002. If any of the following risks actually occurs, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be harmed and the trading price of our common stock could decline and you may lose all or part of your investment in our common stock.

We have not reported an operating profit for any year since our incorporation and have experienced net losses of approximately $22.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2002 and $19.7 million and $46.0 million for the years ended December 31, 2001 and 2000, respectively.

The market price of our common stock has been volatile and will likely continue to fluctuate significantly in response to the following factors, some of which are beyond our control:

• variations in our quarterly operating results;
• changes in financial estimates of our revenues and operating results by securities analysts;
• changes in market valuations of integrated circuit companies;
• announcements by us, our competitors or others in related market segments of significant contracts, acquisitions, strategic partnerships, joint ventures or capital commitments;
• loss or decrease in sales to a major customer or failure to complete significant transactions;
• loss or reduction in manufacturing capacity from one or more of our key suppliers;
• additions or departures of key personnel;
• future sales of our common stock;
• inconsistent or low levels of trading volume of our common stock;
• commencement of or involvement in litigation;
• announcements by us or our competitors of key design wins and product introductions;
• a decrease in the average selling price of our products;
• ability to achieve cost reductions; and
• fluctuations in the timing and amount of customer requests for product shipments.

Many telecommunications service providers have reduced their spending on DSL equipment, which has resulted in lower than expected sales volume for DSL equipment manufacturers including some of our major historical customers. This trend, if continued, could result in lower than expected demand for our products, which could have a material adverse effect on our revenues and results of operations generally, and could cause the market price of our common stock to decline.

Sales to customers located in Japan accounted for 84% of net revenues for the nine months ended September 30, 2002 and 87% of net revenues for the year ended December 31, 2001. Any slowdown in the demand for our customers' equipment in Japan may cause our revenues to decline. Our sales have been historically denominated in U.S. dollars and major fluctuations in currency exchange rates could materially affect our Japanese customers' demand, thereby forcing them to reduce their orders, which could adversely affect our operating results.

We have worked in partnership with local telecommunications companies to develop the Annex C standard for the DSL market in Japan and have been able to achieve the majority market share of DSL equipment purchases, based on our products, in Japan. In July 2001, a certain service provider announced plans to deploy lower priced competing DSL technologies in Japan and has subsequently deployed these competing technologies. If these competing technologies continue to be successful, our market share in the DSL market in Japan may decline and our business and operating results may be adversely affected.

A substantial portion of our revenues has been derived from customers located outside of the United States. For the nine months ended September 30, 2002 and for the year ended December 31, 2001, 87% and 89%, respectively, of our net revenues were to customers located in Asia. We may be unable to successfully overcome the difficulties associated with international operations. These difficulties include:

• staffing and managing foreign operations;
• changes in regulatory requirements;
• licenses, tariffs and other trade barriers;
• political and economic instability;
• difficulties in protecting intellectual property rights in some foreign countries;
• a limited ability to enforce agreements and other rights in some foreign countries;
• obtaining governmental approvals for products; and
• complying with a wide variety of complex foreign laws and treaties.

Because sales of our products are denominated exclusively in United States dollars, increases in the value of the United States dollar could increase the price of our products so that they become relatively more expensive to customers in the local currency of a particular country, leading to a reduction in sales and profitability in that country.

WE DEPEND ON A FEW CUSTOMERS AND IF WE LOSE ANY OF THEM OUR SALES AND OPERATIONS WILL SUFFER.

We sell our DSL products primarily to network equipment manufacturers. Our top two customers for the nine months ended September 30, 2002 were Sumitomo and NEC, accounting for 44% and 40% of our net revenues. For the year ended December 31, 2001, Sumitomo and NEC accounted for 48% and 38% of our net revenues, respectively. We do not have contractual volume commitments with these customers, but rather sell our products to them on an order-by-order basis. We expect to be dependent upon a relatively small number of large customers in future periods, although the specific customers may vary from period to period. If we are not successful in maintaining relationships with key customers and winning new customers, our business and results of operations will suffer.

Our customers are in most cases larger than us and are able to exert a high degree of influence over us. These customers may have sufficient bargaining power to demand low prices and other terms and conditions that may materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. In addition, prior to selling our products to such customers, we must typically undergo lengthy product approval processes, often taking up to one year. Accordingly, we are continually submitting successive versions of our products as well as new products to our customers for approval. The length of the approval process can vary and is affected by a number of factors, including customer priorities, customer budgets and regulatory issues affecting telecommunication service providers. Delays in the product approval process could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. While we have been successful in the past in obtaining product approvals from our customers, such approvals and the ensuing sales of such products may not continue to occur. Delays can also be caused by late deliveries by other vendors, changes in implementation priorities and slower than anticipated growth in demand for the services that our products support. A delay in, or cancellation of, the sale of our products could adversely affect our results from operations or cause them to significantly vary from quarter to quarter.

Sales of our products depend on the increased use and widespread adoption of broadband access services, and DSL services in particular, and the ability of telecommunications service providers to market and sell broadband access services. Our business would be harmed, and our results of operations and financial condition would be adversely affected, if the use of broadband access services does not increase as anticipated. Certain critical factors will likely continue to affect the development of the broadband access service market. These factors include:

• inconsistent quality and reliability of service;
• lack of availability of cost-effective, high-speed service;
• lack of interoperability among multiple vendors' network equipment;
• congestion in service providers' networks;
• inadequate security; and
• slow deployment of new broadband services over DSL lines.

BECAUSE THE SALES CYCLE FOR OUR PRODUCTS TYPICALLY LASTS UP TO ONE YEAR, AND MAY BE SUBJECT TO DELAYS, IT IS DIFFICULT TO FORECAST SALES FOR ANY GIVEN PERIOD.

If we fail to realize forecasted sales for a particular period, our stock price could decline significantly. The sales cycle of our products is lengthy and typically involves a detailed initial technical evaluation of our products by our prospective customers, followed by the design, construction and testing of prototypes incorporating our products. Only after these steps are complete will we receive a purchase order from a customer for volume shipments. This process generally takes from 9 to 12 months, and may last longer. Given this lengthy sales cycle, it is difficult to accurately predict when sales to a particular customer will occur. In addition, we may experience unexpected delays in orders from customers, which may prevent us from realizing forecasted sales for a particular period. Our products are typically sold to equipment manufacturers, who incorporate our products in the products that they in turn sell to consumers or to network service providers. As a result, any delay by our customers, or by our customers' customers, in the manufacture or distribution of their products will result in a delay in obtaining orders for our products.

The market for chip sets for DSL products is characterized by:

• intense competition;
• rapid technological change;
• frequent new product introductions by our competitors;
• changes in customer demands; and
• evolving industry standards.

Any of these factors could make our products obsolete or unmarketable. In addition, the life cycles of some of our products may depend upon the life cycles of the end products into which our products will be designed. Products with short life cycles require us to closely manage production and inventory levels. Unanticipated changes in the estimated total demand for our products and/or the estimated life cycles of the end products into which our products are designed may result in obsolete or excess inventories, which in turn may adversely affect our operating results. To compete, we must innovate and introduce new products. If we fail to successfully introduce new products on a timely and cost-effective basis that meet customer requirements and are compatible with evolving industry standards, then our business, financial condition and results of operations will be seriously harmed.

DSL services are competing with a variety of different broadband data transmission technologies, including cable modems, satellite and other wireless technologies. If any technology that is competing with DSL technology is more reliable, faster and less expensive or has other advantages over DSL technology, then the demand for our DSL products may decrease.

OUR MARKETS ARE HIGHLY COMPETITIVE AND MANY OF OUR COMPETITORS ARE ESTABLISHED AND HAVE GREATER RESOURCES THAN WE HAVE.

The market for communications semiconductor and software solutions is intensely competitive. Given our stage of development, there is a substantial risk that we will not have the financial resources, technical expertise or marketing and support capabilities to compete successfully. In addition, a number of other semiconductor companies have announced their intent to enter the market segments adjacent to or addressed by our products. These competitors have longer operating histories, greater name recognition, larger installed customer bases and significantly greater financial, technical and marketing resources than we have. We may also face competition from customers' or prospective customers' own internal development efforts. Any of these competitors may be able to introduce new technologies, respond more quickly to changing customer requirements or devote greater resources to the development, promotion and sale of their products than we can.

BECAUSE OUR PRODUCTS ARE COMPONENTS OF OTHER EQUIPMENT, IF BROADBAND EQUIPMENT MANUFACTURERS DO NOT INCORPORATE OUR PRODUCTS IN THEIR EQUIPMENT, WE MAY NOT BE ABLE TO GENERATE SALES OF OUR PRODUCTS IN VOLUME QUANTITIES.

Our products are not sold directly to the end-user; they are components of other products. As a result, we rely upon equipment manufacturers to design our products into their equipment. We further rely on the manufacturing and deployment of the equipment to be successful. If equipment that incorporates our products is not accepted in the marketplace, we may not achieve sales of our products in volume quantities, which would have a negative impact on our results of operations.

BECAUSE MANUFACTURERS OF COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT MAY BE RELUCTANT TO CHANGE THEIR SOURCES OF COMPONENTS, IF WE DO NOT ACHIEVE DESIGN WINS WITH SUCH MANUFACTURERS, WE MAY BE UNABLE TO SECURE SALES FROM THESE CUSTOMERS IN THE FUTURE.

Once a manufacturer of communications equipment has designed a supplier's semiconductor into its products, the manufacturer may be reluctant to change its source of semiconductors due to the significant costs associated with qualifying a new supplier. Accordingly, our failure to achieve design wins with equipment manufacturers, who have chosen a competitor's semiconductor could create barriers to future sales opportunities with these manufacturers.

There is a significant risk that third parties, including current and potential competitors, will claim that our products, or our customers' products, infringe on their intellectual property rights. The owners of these intellectual property rights may bring infringement claims against us or our customers. Any such litigation, whether or not determined in our favor or settled by us, would be costly and divert the attention of our management and technical personnel. Inquiries with respect to the coverage of our intellectual property could develop into litigation. In the event of an adverse ruling for an intellectual property infringement claim, we could be required to obtain a license or pay substantial damages or have the sale of our products stopped by an injunction. Such a license may not be available on reasonable terms, or at all. In addition, if a customer of our products cannot acquire a required license on commercially reasonable terms, that customer may choose not to use our products. We have obligations to indemnify our customers under some circumstances for infringement of third-party intellectual property rights. If any intellectual property claims from third parties against one of our customers whom we have indemnified is held to be valid, the costs to us could be substantial and our business could be harmed.

We have received correspondence from certain parties, including Texas Instruments, Alcatel and Ricoh, requesting us to discuss the potential need for non-exclusive licenses permitting us to utilize technology covered by various patents held by these parties. We could be subject to claims similar to the Texas Instruments, Alcatel and Ricoh claims in the future. Depending on the amount and timing of any unfavorable resolutions of these claims, our future results of operations or cash flows could be materially adversely affected.

IF WE DELIVER PRODUCTS WITH DEFECTS, OUR CREDIBILITY WILL BE HARMED, AND THE SALES AND MARKET ACCEPTANCE OF OUR PRODUCTS WILL DECREASE.

Our products are complex and have contained errors, defects and bugs when introduced and revised. If we deliver products with errors, defects or bugs or products that have reliability, quality or compatibility problems, our credibility and the market acceptance and sales of our products could be harmed, which could adversely affect our ability to retain existing customers or attract new customers. Further, if our products contain errors, defects and bugs, then we may be required to expend significant capital and resources to alleviate such problems and may have our sales to customers interrupted or delayed. If any of these problems are not found until we have commenced commercial production, we may be required to incur additional development costs and product repair or replacement costs. Defects could also lead to potential liability as a result of product liability lawsuits against us or against our customers. We have agreed to indemnify our customers in some circumstances against liability from defects in our products. A successful product liability claim could seriously harm our business, financial condition and results of operations, and may divert our technical and other resources from other development efforts.

WE DEPEND ON SOLE SOURCE SUPPLIERS FOR SEVERAL KEY COMPONENTS OF OUR PRODUCTS.

We obtain certain parts, components and packaging used in the delivery of our products from sole sources of supply. For example, we obtain digital semiconductor wafers from Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd and we obtain analog silicon wafers from United Microelectronics Corporation. If we fail to obtain components in sufficient quantities when required or if we cannot adequately control manufacturing process quality, product yields or production costs, our business could be harmed. Developing and maintaining these strategic relationships with our vendors is critical for us to be successful.

Any of our sole source suppliers may:

• enter into exclusive arrangements with our competitors;
• stop selling their products or components to us at commercially reasonable prices;
• refuse to sell their products or components to us at any price; or
• be subject to production disruptions such as earthquakes.

In order to remain competitive, we expect to continue to transition our products to increasingly smaller line width geometries. This transition will require us to modify the manufacturing processes for our products and redesign some products. We periodically evaluate the benefits, on a product-by-product basis, of migrating to smaller geometry process technologies to reduce our costs, and we have designed some of our products to be manufactured in .35 micron, .25 micron, .18 micron and .13 micron geometry processes. In the past, we have experienced some difficulties in shifting to smaller geometry process technologies or new manufacturing processes, which resulted in reduced manufacturing yields, delays in product deliveries and increased expenses. We may face similar difficulties, delays and expenses as we continue to transition our products to smaller geometry processes. We are dependent on our relationships with our foundries to transition to smaller geometry processes successfully. We cannot assure you that our foundries will be able to effectively manage the transition or that we will be able to maintain our foundry relationships. If our foundries or we experience significant delays in this transition or fail to efficiently implement this transition, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected. As smaller geometry processes become more prevalent, we expect to continue to integrate greater levels of functionality, as well as customer and third party intellectual property, into our products. However, we may not be able to achieve higher levels of design integration or deliver new integrated products on a timely basis, or at all.

The markets in which we compete are characterized by increasing consolidation both within the telecommunications equipment sector and by companies combining or acquiring data communications assets and assets for delivering voice-related services. We cannot predict with certainty how industry consolidation will affect our competitors. We may not be able to compete successfully in an increasingly consolidated industry. Increased competition and consolidation in our industry may require that we reduce the prices of our products or result in a loss of market share, which could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. Additionally, because we are now, and may in the future be, dependent on certain strategic relationships with third parties in our industry, any additional consolidation involving these parties could reduce the demand for our products and otherwise harm our business prospects.

WE MAY MAKE FUTURE ACQUISITIONS AND ACQUISITIONS INVOLVE NUMEROUS RISKS.

Our business is highly competitive and, as such, our growth is dependent upon market growth, our ability to enhance our existing products and our ability to introduce new products on a timely basis. One of the ways we have addressed and may continue to address the need to develop new products is through acquisitions of other companies. Acquisitions involve numerous risks, including the following:

• difficulties in integration of the operations, technologies and products of the acquired companies;
• the risk of diverting management's attention from normal daily operations of the business;
• potential difficulties in completing projects associated with purchased in-process research and development;
• risks of entering markets in which we have no or limited direct prior experience and where competitors in such markets have stronger market positions; and
• the potential loss of key employees of the acquired company.

Mergers and acquisitions of high-technology companies are inherently risky, and no assurance can be given that our previous or future acquisitions will be successful and will not materially adversely affect our business, operating results or financial condition.

We must also maintain our ability to manage such growth effectively. Failure to manage growth effectively and successfully integrate acquisitions could harm our business and operating results.

Our officers and directors and their affiliates owned or controlled approximately 17.3% of our common stock as of July 16, 2002. Accordingly, our officers and directors and their affiliates, as a group, may have the ability to control the election of a majority of the members of our board of directors and the outcome of corporate actions requiring stockholder approval. This concentration of ownership may have the effect of delaying, deferring or preventing a change in control of us, or may impede a merger, consolidation, takeover or other business combination involving us. This concentration of ownership could also adversely affect our stock's market price or lessen any premium over market price that an acquirer might otherwise pay.

OUR EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND KEY PERSONNEL ARE CRITICAL TO OUR BUSINESS, AND THESE OFFICERS AND PERSONNEL MAY NOT REMAIN WITH US IN THE FUTURE.

We depend upon the continuing contributions of our key management, sales, customer support and product development personnel. The loss of such personnel could seriously harm us. In addition, we have not obtained key-man life insurance on any of our executive officers or key employees.

OUR FUTURE SUCCESS WILL DEPEND IN PART ON OUR ABILITY TO PROTECT OUR PROPRIETARY RIGHTS AND THE TECHNOLOGIES USED IN OUR PRINCIPAL PRODUCTS, AND IF WE DO NOT ENFORCE AND PROTECT OUR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY, OUR BUSINESS WILL BE HARMED.

We rely on a combination of patent, copyright and trademark laws, trade secrets, confidentiality agreements and other contractual provisions to protect our proprietary rights. However, these measures afford only limited protection. Our failure to adequately protect our proprietary rights may adversely affect us. Despite our efforts to protect our proprietary rights, unauthorized parties may attempt to copy aspects of our products or to obtain and use trade secrets or other information that we regard as proprietary.

The laws of some foreign countries do not protect our proprietary rights to the same extent as do the laws of the United States, and many U.S. companies have encountered substantial infringement problems in these countries. There is a risk that our efforts to protect proprietary rights may not be adequate. For example, our competitors may independently develop similar technology, duplicate our products or design around our patents or our other intellectual property rights. If we fail to adequately protect our intellectual property or if the laws of a foreign jurisdiction do not effectively permit such protection, it would be easier for our competitors to sell competing products.

We expect that our current cash and cash equivalents and short-term investment balances will be adequate to meet our working capital and capital expenditure needs for at least twelve months. After that, we may need to raise additional funds, and we cannot be certain that we will be able to obtain additional financing on favorable terms, if at all. We may also require additional capital for the acquisition of businesses, products and technologies that are complementary to ours. Further, if we issue equity securities, the ownership percentage of our stockholders would be reduced, and the new equity securities may have rights, preferences or privileges senior to those existing holders of our common stock. If we cannot raise needed funds on acceptable terms, we may not be able to develop or enhance our products, take advantage of future opportunities or respond to competitive pressures or unanticipated requirements, which could seriously harm our business, operating results and financial condition.

The primary objective of our cash and short-term investment activities is to preserve principal while concurrently maximizing the income we receive from our investments without significantly increasing risk. Some of the securities that we may invest in may be subject to market risk. This means that a change in prevailing interest rates may cause the principal amount of the investment to fluctuate. For example, if we hold a security that was issued with a fixed interest rate at the then-prevailing rate and the prevailing interest rate later rises, the current value of the principal amount of our investment will decline. To minimize this risk in the future, we intend to maintain our portfolio of cash equivalents and short-term investments in a variety of securities, including commercial paper, money market funds, government and non- government debt securities and certificates of deposit. In general, money market funds are not subject to market risk because the interest paid on such funds fluctuates with the prevailing interest rate. As of September 30, 2002, all of our investments were in money market funds and government debt securities. A hypothetical 100 basis point increase in interest rates would result in an approximate $16,000 decrease in the fair value of our available-for-sale securities as of September 30, 2002.

The Company's Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer, have conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-14. Based on that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer concluded that the disclosure controls and procedures are effective in ensuring that all material information required to be filed in this quarterly report has been made known to them in a timely fashion.

There have been no significant changes in internal controls, or in factors that could significantly affect internal controls, subsequent to the date the Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer completed their evaluation.

The Company is not currently a party to any material litigation.

None

None

None

In accordance with Section 10A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended by Section 202 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002, non-audit services approved in the third quarter by the company's Audit Committee to be performed by Ernst & Young, the company's independent auditors, are as follows: tax-related services.

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

Dated: November 8, 2002