UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, DC 20549
FORM 10-Q
ý |
|
Quarterly report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
|
|
|
|
|
for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2005 or |
|
|
|
o |
|
Transition report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
|
|
|
|
|
for the transition period from . |
No. 000-24601
(Commission File
Number)
PSB BANCORP, INC.
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)
Pennsylvania |
|
23-2930740 |
(State of Incorporation) |
|
(IRS Employer ID Number) |
1835 Market Street, Philadelphia, PA 19103
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
(215) 979-7900
(Registrants Telephone
Number)
Indicate by checkmark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes ý No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.)
Yes o No ý
Number of shares outstanding as of March 31, 2005
Common Stock (no par value) |
|
4,893,609 |
(Title of Class) |
|
(Outstanding Shares) |
PSB BANCORP, INC.
FORM 10-Q
FOR THE QUARTER ENDED MARCH 31, 2005
TABLE OF CONTENTS
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
PSB BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
(In thousands except per share data)
|
|
March 31, |
|
December 31, |
|
||
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
(Audited) |
|
||
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Cash and due from banks |
|
$ |
7,554 |
|
$ |
4,355 |
|
Interest-earning deposits with banks |
|
55,715 |
|
49,964 |
|
||
Federal funds sold |
|
2,654 |
|
331 |
|
||
Total cash and cash equivalents |
|
65,923 |
|
54,650 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Loans held-for-sale |
|
1,018 |
|
3,792 |
|
||
Investment securities available-for-sale, at fair value |
|
89,619 |
|
94,112 |
|
||
Investment securities held to maturity (fair value $1,506 and $1,544) |
|
1,510 |
|
1,533 |
|
||
Federal Home Loan Bank stock at cost |
|
1,009 |
|
1,308 |
|
||
Federal Reserve Bank stock at cost |
|
1,187 |
|
1,139 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Loans |
|
355,411 |
|
356,142 |
|
||
Less allowance for possible loans losses |
|
(3,201 |
) |
(3,157 |
) |
||
Net loans |
|
352,210 |
|
352,985 |
|
||
Accrued interest receivable |
|
2,269 |
|
2,071 |
|
||
Premises and equipment, net |
|
2,655 |
|
2,470 |
|
||
Bank-owned life insurance |
|
12,810 |
|
12,696 |
|
||
Other assets |
|
7,338 |
|
6,321 |
|
||
|
|
25,072 |
|
23,558 |
|
||
Total assets |
|
$ |
537,548 |
|
$ |
533,077 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Deposits |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Non-interest bearing |
|
37,497 |
|
30,786 |
|
||
Interest bearing |
|
441,835 |
|
444,494 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Total deposits |
|
479,332 |
|
475,280 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase |
|
1,116 |
|
1,105 |
|
||
Advances from borrowers for taxes and insurance |
|
2,540 |
|
3,114 |
|
||
Other liabilities |
|
2,642 |
|
1,421 |
|
||
|
|
6,298 |
|
5,640 |
|
||
Total liabilities |
|
485,630 |
|
480,920 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Shareholders equity |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Common stock authorized, 15,000,000 shares no par value, 4,890,543 and 4,890,543 shares issued and outstanding on March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004, respectively |
|
4,893,609 |
|
45,270 |
|
||
Retained earnings |
|
9,563 |
|
8,989 |
|
||
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
|
(1,454 |
) |
(440 |
) |
||
Employee stock ownership plan |
|
(1,198 |
) |
(1,232 |
) |
||
Treasury stock, at cost, 78,187 and 78,187 on March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004, respectively |
|
(430 |
) |
(430 |
) |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Total shareholders equity |
|
51,918 |
|
52,157 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Total liabilities and shareholders equity |
|
$ |
537,548 |
|
$ |
533,077 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements
2
PSB BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(In thousands, except per share data)
|
|
Three months ended |
|
||||
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
||
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
||||
Interest income |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Loans, including fees |
|
$ |
6,045 |
|
$ |
5,226 |
|
Investment securities |
|
834 |
|
918 |
|
||
Deposits with banks |
|
309 |
|
90 |
|
||
Total interest income |
|
7,188 |
|
6,234 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Interest expense |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Interest on deposits |
|
2,489 |
|
1,797 |
|
||
Interest on borrowings |
|
6 |
|
6 |
|
||
Total interest expense |
|
2,495 |
|
1,803 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Net interest income |
|
4,693 |
|
4,431 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Provision for loan losses |
|
135 |
|
0 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Net interest income after provision for loan losses |
|
4,558 |
|
4,431 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Non-interest operating income |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Service fees on deposit accounts |
|
322 |
|
276 |
|
||
Loss on sale of real estate owned |
|
(38 |
) |
(2 |
) |
||
Banked owned life insurance |
|
115 |
|
76 |
|
||
Gain on sale of Investments Securities |
|
420 |
|
|
|
||
Other |
|
113 |
|
123 |
|
||
|
|
932 |
|
473 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Non-interest expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Salaries and employee benefits |
|
2,488 |
|
2,221 |
|
||
Occupancy and equipment |
|
648 |
|
564 |
|
||
Other operating |
|
1,572 |
|
1,305 |
|
||
Total non-interest expenses |
|
4,708 |
|
4,090 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Income before net effect of income taxes and Ironbridge consolidation |
|
782 |
|
814 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Net Effect of Ironbridge consolidation |
|
35 |
|
32 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Income before net effect of income taxes |
|
817 |
|
846 |
|
||
Income taxes |
|
(246 |
) |
(238 |
) |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Net income |
|
$ |
571 |
|
$ |
608 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Net income per common share |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Basic: |
|
$ |
0.12 |
|
$ |
0.14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Diluted: |
|
$ |
0.10 |
|
$ |
0.14 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements
3
PSB BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands, except per share data)
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
||||
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
||
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
||||
CASH FLOW FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Net income |
|
$ |
571 |
|
$ |
608 |
|
Adjustments used in operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Provision for possible loan losses |
|
135 |
|
|
|
||
Depreciation and amortization |
|
246 |
|
165 |
|
||
Amortization of discounts and accretion of premiums on investment securities |
|
56 |
|
(49 |
) |
||
Restricted Stock |
|
100 |
|
|
|
||
Loss on sale of real estate owned |
|
38 |
|
2 |
|
||
Gain on sale of investment securities |
|
(420 |
) |
|
|
||
Proceeds from sale and amortization of loans held-for-sale |
|
9,679 |
|
6,369 |
|
||
Originations of loans held-for-sale |
|
(6,905 |
) |
(5,276 |
) |
||
ESOP expense |
|
100 |
|
152 |
|
||
Change in assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
(Increase) decrease in accrued interest receivable |
|
(198 |
) |
189 |
|
||
(Increase) in other assets |
|
(32 |
) |
(1,217 |
) |
||
(Increase) decrease change in accrued expenses |
|
944 |
|
(1275 |
) |
||
Total Adjustments |
|
3,743 |
|
(940 |
) |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities |
|
4,314 |
|
(332 |
) |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Purchase of investment securities, available-for-sale |
|
(2,198 |
) |
(5,000 |
) |
||
Proceeds from maturities and calls of investment securities |
|
5,578 |
|
13,612 |
|
||
Purchase of Federal Home Loan Bank and Federal Reserve Bank Stock |
|
251 |
|
(906 |
) |
||
Net decrease (increase) in loans |
|
104 |
|
(2,581 |
) |
||
Proceeds from sale of real estate owned |
|
165 |
|
36 |
|
||
Purchase of premises and equipment |
|
(430 |
) |
(26 |
) |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Net cash provided by investing activities |
|
3,470 |
|
5,135 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Net increase in deposits |
|
4,052 |
|
19,784 |
|
||
Increase in securities sold under agreements to repurchase |
|
11 |
|
3 |
|
||
(Decrease) increase in advances for borrowers taxes and insurance |
|
(574 |
) |
137 |
|
||
Exercised stock options |
|
|
|
27 |
|
||
Net cash provided by financing activities |
|
3,489 |
|
19,951 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
NET INCREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS |
|
11,273 |
|
24,754 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period |
|
54,650 |
|
52,408 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, END OF PERIOD |
|
$ |
65,923 |
|
$ |
77,162 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements
4
PSB BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(In thousands)
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
||||
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
||
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
||||
Net income |
|
$ |
571 |
|
$ |
608 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Other comprehensive income, net of tax: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Accumulated comprehensive income (loss), investments available for sale |
|
(1,014 |
) |
(713 |
) |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Comprehensive (loss) |
|
$ |
(443 |
) |
$ |
(105 |
) |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements
5
PSB BANCORP, INC.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
MARCH 31, 2005
(Unaudited)
1. Basis of Presentation
This quarterly report presents the consolidated financial statements of PSB Bancorp, Inc. (PSB) and its subsidiaries.
PSBs financial statements reflect all adjustments and disclosures that management believes are necessary for a fair presentation of interim results. The result of operation for the quarter presented does not necessarily indicate the results that PSB will achieve for all of 2005. You should read these interim financial statements in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes that are presented in the PSB Bancorp, Inc. Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004.
The financial information in this quarterly report has been prepared in accordance with PSBs customary accounting practices; these financial statements have not been audited. Certain information and footnote disclosures required under generally accepted accounting principles have been condensed or omitted, as permitted by rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission.
2. Earnings Per Share (EPS)
PSB appealed the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvanias ruling in favor of the plaintiffs motion for summary judgment regarding the validity of 895,240 stock options previously declared void by PSB. Pending the outcome of the appeal, PSB and the plaintiffs entered into an agreement whereby shares of PSB common stock were issued to the plaintiffs at the strike price of the contested options. However, both the shares of common stock and the proceeds of the exercise of the options have been escrowed pending the outcome of the appeal. On February 15, 2005, The United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit (the Appeals Court) upheld the grant of summary judgment for the plaintiffs. On February 28, 2005, PSB filed a motion for rehearing with the Appeals Court in which PSB averred that, based on recently discovered information, the court lacked jurisdiction because at least one of the plaintiffs was a Pennsylvania resident and therefore diversity of citizenship, thus jurisdiction, was absent.
Subsequent Events
On April 1, 2005, the Appeals Court reversed its prior decision for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and remanded the case to the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania (the Court) with instructions to dismiss the underlying case for lack of subject matter. On April 26, 2005, the Court dismissed the original case with prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.
The following table illustrates the required disclosure of the numerators and denominators of the basic and diluted EPS computation. Because the dismissal of plaintiffs case did not occur until after the quarter end, the computation of dilutive earnings per share now includes 895,240 shares of the 1,371,200 options which were issued in connection with the 1999 First Bank of Philadelphia acquisition and were originally deemed invalid by management. These shares are considered to be contingently issuable shares and are required to be included in the calculation of diluted EPS and excluded from the calculation of basic EPS for the three periods ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, because they currently are held in escrow and all or part may be returned pending the outcome of the appeal of the court ruling which rendered the options valid.
|
|
Three months ended March 31, 2005 |
|
||||||
|
|
Income |
|
Weighted |
|
Per share |
|
||
|
|
(In thousands, except per share data) |
|
||||||
Basic earnings per share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Income available to common stockholders |
|
$ |
571 |
|
4,668 |
|
$ |
0.12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Effect of dilutive stock options |
|
|
|
1,004 |
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Diluted earnings per share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Income available to common stockholders plus effect of dilutive securities |
|
$ |
571 |
|
5,672 |
|
$ |
0.10 |
|
6
No options were anti-dilutive at March 31, 2005.
|
|
Three months ended March 31, 2004 |
|
||||||
|
|
Income |
|
Weighted |
|
Per share |
|
||
|
|
(In thousands, except per share data) |
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Basic earnings per share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Income available to common stockholders |
|
$ |
608 |
|
4,269 |
|
$ |
0.14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Effect of dilutive stock options |
|
|
|
145 |
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Diluted earnings per share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Income available to common stockholders plus effect of dilutive securities |
|
$ |
1,511 |
|
4,414 |
|
$ |
0.14 |
|
No options were anti-dilutive at March 31, 2004.
3. New Accounting Pronouncements
In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 123R, Share-Based Payment (SFAS 123R). This statement is a revision of SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, and supersedes APB Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees. SFAS 123R requires all share-based payments to employees, including grants of employee stock options, to be recognized in the financial statements based on their fair values. The provisions of this statement are effective for interim or annual periods beginning after June 15, 2005. The Company is currently evaluating the provisions of this revision to determine the impact on its consolidated financial statements. It is, however, expected to have a negative effect on consolidated net income.
In March 2005 the FASB issued Interpretation No. 47, Accounting for Conditional Asset Retirement Obligations (FIN 47). FIN 47 requires an entity to recognize a liability for the fair value of a legal obligation to perform asset-retirement activities that are conditional on a future event if the amount can be reasonably estimated. The Interpretation provides guidance to evaluate whether fair value is reasonably estimable. FIN 47 is effective no later than the end of fiscal years ending after December 15, 2005. FIN 47 is not expected to have a material impact on the Companys financial position or results of operations.
4. Variable Interest Entities
In January 29, 1999, PSB purchased 1,600,000 shares of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock, $.01 par value per share, (the Preferred Stock) of McGuire Performance Solutions, Inc. (MPS). PSB purchased the shares for $.78125 per share for a total cost of $1,250,000. In 2000, MPS changed its name to Iron Bridge Holdings, Inc. (Iron Bridge) and formed two new subsidiaries, one adopting the MPS name and the other, Avanti Capital, Inc, a registered investment advisory company. During the year ended December 31, 2001, PSB purchased an additional 375,000 shares and 500,000 shares, respectively, of the Preferred Stock for $1.00 per share for a total cost $875,000. On December 27, 2002, the founding shareholders of Iron Bridge purchased from PSB 314,350 shares of preferred stock for $0.88 per share, which was the average cost per share paid by PSB for these shares. PSB currently owns 87.7% of the Preferred Stock, which represents a 49.9% fully diluted ownership interest in Iron Bridge. The Iron Bridge subsidiary, MPS, is a nationally recognized firm delivering cost-effective solutions for high performance total balance sheet management to banks, thrifts, credit unions and other financial institutions.
7
In the first quarter of 2004 PSB adopted FASB interpretation No. 46(R) Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities (FIN 46(R)). In applying FIN 46(R), it was determined that PSB, as the largest shareholder and virtually Iron Bridges only financial resource, would absorb a majority of Iron Bridges expected losses. Therefore, it was PSBs conclusion that in accordance with FIN 46(R), Iron Bridge is a variable interest entity and thus PSB was required to consolidate the financial results of Iron Bridge during the first quarter of 2004.
The consolidation of Iron Bridge resulted in PSB recording goodwill of $1.4 million and minority interest of $277,000. PSB accounts for goodwill in accordance with SFAS 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets. Goodwill is now subject to impairment testing at least annually to determine whether write-downs of the recorded balances are necessary. PSB tests for impairment based on the goodwill maintained at each defined reporting unit. A fair value is determined for each reporting unit based on at least one of three various market valuation methodologies. If the fair value of the reporting unit exceeds its then book value, no write-down of recorded goodwill is necessary. If the fair value of a reporting unit is less, an expense may be required on PSBs books to write down the related goodwill to the proper carrying value. As of March 31, 2005, PSB completed its impairment testing, and determined that no impairment write-off was necessary. No assurance can be given that future goodwill impairment tests will not result in a charge to earnings.
5. Reclassifications
Certain 2004 amounts have been reclassified to conform to the 2005 presentation.
8
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of the Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
General
PSBs results of operations depend primarily on the Banks net interest income, which is the difference between interest income on interest-earning assets, and interest expense on its interest-bearing liabilities. The Banks interest-earning assets consist primarily of loans receivable and investment securities, while its interest-bearing liabilities consist primarily of deposits and borrowings. The Banks net income is also affected by its provision for loan losses and its level of non-interest income as well as by its non-interest expense, such as salary, employee benefits, occupancy costs, and charges relating to non-performing and other classified assets.
Impact of Inflation
The financial statements and related financial data presented herein have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles that require the measurement of financial position and operating results in terms of historical dollars without considering changes in the relative purchasing power of money over time due to inflation. The primary impact of inflation on the operation of the Bank is reflected in increased operating costs. Unlike most industrial companies, virtually all of the assets and liabilities of a financial institution are monetary in nature. As a result, interest rates have a more significant impact on a financial institutions performance than the effects of inflation. Interest rates do not necessarily move in the same direction or in the same magnitude as the price of goods and services.
Critical Accounting Policies, Judgments, and Estimates
The accounting and reporting policies of the Company and its subsidiaries conform with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (US GAAP) applicable to the financial services industry. All significant inter-company transactions are eliminated in consolidation and certain reclassifications are made when necessary to conform the previous years financial statements to the current years presentation. In preparing the consolidated financial statements, management is required to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amount of assets and liabilities as of the dates of the balance sheets and revenues and expenditures for the periods presented. Therefore, actual results could differ significantly from those estimates.
Allowance for Loan Losses-PSB uses the reserve method of accounting for loan losses. The balance in the allowance for loan losses is determined based on managements review and evaluation of the loan portfolio in relation to past loss experience, the size and composition of the portfolio, current economic events and conditions, and other pertinent factors, including managements assumptions as to future delinquencies, recoveries, and losses. Increases to the allowance for loan losses are made by charges to the provision for loan losses. Recoveries of previously charged-off amounts are credited to the allowance for loan losses.
While management considers the allowance for loan losses to be adequate based on information currently available, future additions to the allowance may be necessary due to changes in economic conditions or managements assumptions as to future delinquencies, recoveries and losses and managements intent with regard to the disposition of loans. In addition, the regulators, as an integral part of their examination process, periodically review the Banks allowance for loan losses. The banking regulators may require the Bank to recognize additions to the allowance for loan losses based on their judgments about information available to them at the time of their examination.
Income TaxesUnder the liability method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on the difference between the financial statement and tax bases of assets and liabilities. Based upon the review of all components of the deferred tax assets and liabilities, future taxable income of PSB and regulatory guidelines, management has determined that no allowance is deemed necessary at December 31, 2004. However, circumstances could arise that would require management to revisit the need for such an allowance.
PSB accounts for goodwill in accordance with SFAS 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets. Goodwill is now subject to impairment testing at least annually to determine whether write-downs of the recorded balances are necessary. PSB tests for impairment based on the goodwill maintained at each defined reporting unit. A fair value is determined for each reporting unit based on at least one of three various market valuation methodologies. If the fair value of the reporting unit exceeds its then book value, no write-down of recorded goodwill is necessary. If the fair value of a reporting unit is less, an expense may be required on PSBs books to write down the related goodwill to the proper carrying value. As of December 31, 2004, PSB completed its transitional testing, and determined that no impairment write-off was necessary. No assurance can be given that future goodwill impairment tests will not result in a charge of earnings.
Performance Overview
PSBs net income for the first quarter of 2005 was $571,000 or $0.12 and $0.10 on a basic and diluted per share basis, respectively, compared to net income of $608,000 or $0.14 per basic and diluted share for 2004. The results for the first quarter of 2005 were affected primarily by rising interest rates that decreased the yield on loans and mortgage-backed securities and increased the cost of funds. Additionally, increases in non-interest expense in the areas of salaries and employee benefits, professional fees and other operating expenses related to the opening of a new branch in the Chinatown section of Philadelphia had a dampening effect on net income.
9
The Banks net interest margin decreased by 33 basis points from 4.03% for the three months ended March 31, 2004 to 3.70% for the same period in 2005.
Net Income
PSBs net income totaled $571,000 and $608,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and March 31, 2004, respectively. PSBs basic and diluted earnings per share for the three months ended March 31, 2005 were $0.12 and $.0.10 respectively compared to $0.14 and $0.14 for the three months ended March 31, 2004. The results for the first quarter of 2005 were effected primarily by rising interest rates overall that decreased the yield on loans and mortgage-backed securities and increased the cost of funds particularly on the Banks certificates of deposit resulting in a lower interest rate spread. Increases in non-interest expense in the areas of salaries and employee benefits, professional fess and other operating expenses related to the opening of a new branch in the Chinatown section of Philadelphia also negatively effected net income.
Management continues to pursue lending strategies to enhance the growth of consumer home equity, and home equity lines of credit. The commercial real estate and construction loan departments are seeking to currently become more competitive in the uncertain interest rate market while trying to minimize additional credit risk.
Net Interest Income and Average Balances
Net interest income is a key component of PSBs profitability and is managed in coordination with PSBs interest rate sensitivity position. Net interest income for the first quarter of 2005 increased 6.82% from $4.4 million in the first quarter of 2004 compared to $4.7 million for the first quarter of 2005. The increase in net interest income is related to a significant increase in loan volume and interest-earning deposits with banks.
Overall, average total interest-earning assets provided a yield of 5.66% for the three months ended March 31, 2005, compared to 5.67% for the same period in 2004. Average total loans were $356.0 million for the three months ended March 31, 2005, and provided a yield of 6.79% for the period, compared to average total loans of $296.0 million for the three months ended March 31, 2004, which provided a yield of 7.06%.
Average total interest-bearing liabilities increased from $385.5 million to $450.6 million or 16.89% for the three months ended March 31, 2005 compared to the three-month period ended March 31, 2004. The average rate on total interest-bearing liabilities increased 34 basis points from 1.87% for the three months ended March 31, 2004 to 2.21% for the three months ended March 31, 2005. The increase in interest-bearing liabilities resulted entirely from an increase in certificates of deposit. The increase in the overall rate paid on interest-bearing liabilities was due to PSBs decision to increase deposits by offering more competitive interest rates on its certificates of deposit.
Although a majority of these new funds were deployed into lending opportunities, because of competitive conditions, the yield on our loan portfolio fell by 27 basis point. The combination of our increased funding costs and reduced loan yield resulted in the 33 basis point compression of our net interest margin.
Provision for Loan Losses
The provision for loan losses represents the charge against earnings that is required to fund the allowance for loan losses. PSB determines the level of the allowance for loan losses through a regular review of the loan portfolio. Managements evaluation of the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses is based upon an examination of the portfolio as well as such factors as declining trends, the volume of loan concentrations, adverse situations that may affect the borrowers ability to pay, prior loss experience within the portfolio, current economic conditions and the results of the most recent regulatory examinations. PSB made a provision of $135,000 for loan losses during the three months ended March 31, 2005 and made no provision for the three months ended March 31, 2004. Additionally, PSB had charge-offs against the allowance for loan losses of $132,000 and $64,000 and recoveries of $41,000 and $54,000 during the three month periods ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively.
10
Average Balance Sheets and Rate/Yield Analysis
Net interest income is affected by changes in both average interest rates and average volumes of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities. The following tables present the average daily balances of assets, liabilities, and shareholders equity and the respective interest earned or paid on interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, as well as average rates for the period indicated:
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
||||||||||||
|
|
Average |
|
Interest |
|
Yield/ |
|
Average |
|
Interest |
|
Yield/ |
|
||||
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
||||||||||||||
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Interest-earning assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Interest-earning deposits |
|
$ |
58,473 |
|
$ |
309 |
|
2.11 |
% |
$ |
43,039 |
|
$ |
90 |
|
0.84 |
% |
Investment securities |
|
58,260 |
|
468 |
|
3.21 |
|
54,103 |
|
336 |
|
2.48 |
|
||||
Mortgage-backed securities |
|
34,891 |
|
366 |
|
4.20 |
|
46,896 |
|
582 |
|
4.96 |
|
||||
Loans |
|
356,022 |
|
6,045 |
|
6.79 |
|
295,995 |
|
5,226 |
|
7.06 |
|
||||
Total interest-earning assets |
|
507,646 |
|
$ |
7,188 |
|
5.66 |
% |
440,033 |
|
$ |
6,234 |
|
5.67 |
% |
||
Noninterest-earning assets |
|
27,667 |
|
|
|
|
|
40,341 |
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Total assets |
|
$ |
535,313 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
480,374 |
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
LIABILITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Interest-bearing liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Now checking accounts |
|
$ |
25,900 |
|
$ |
34 |
|
0.53 |
% |
$ |
26,602 |
|
$ |
33 |
|
0.50 |
% |
Money market accounts |
|
54,258 |
|
162 |
|
1.19 |
|
68,371 |
|
215 |
|
1.26 |
|
||||
Savings deposits |
|
87,390 |
|
239 |
|
1.09 |
|
91,019 |
|
269 |
|
1.18 |
|
||||
Certificates |
|
281,970 |
|
2,054 |
|
2.91 |
|
198,442 |
|
1,280 |
|
2.58 |
|
||||
Total deposits |
|
449,518 |
|
2,489 |
|
1.11 |
% |
384,434 |
|
1,797 |
|
0.93 |
|
||||
Borrowed money |
|
1,115 |
|
6 |
|
2.15 |
|
1,101 |
|
6 |
|
2.18 |
|
||||
Total interest-bearing liabilities |
|
450,633 |
|
$ |
2,495 |
|
2.21 |
% |
385,535 |
|
$ |
1,803 |
|
1.87 |
% |
||
Non-interest-bearing liabilities |
|
32,642 |
|
|
|
|
|
46,983 |
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Total liabilities |
|
483,275 |
|
|
|
|
|
432,518 |
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Shareholders equity |
|
52,038 |
|
|
|
|
|
47,856 |
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Total liabilities and shareholders equity |
|
$ |
535,313 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
480,374 |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Net interest income |
|
|
|
$ |
4,693 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
4,431 |
|
|
|
||
Interest rate spread |
|
|
|
|
|
3.45 |
% |
|
|
|
|
3.80 |
% |
||||
Net yield on interest-earning assets |
|
|
|
|
|
3.70 |
% |
|
|
|
|
4.03 |
% |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Ratio of interest-earning assets to interest-bearing liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
1.13 |
x |
|
|
|
|
1.14 |
x |
11
Allowance for Loan Losses
The allowance for loan losses is established through a provision for loan losses charged to expense. Loans are charged against the allowance for possible loan losses when management believes that the collectibility of the principal is unlikely. The allowance is an amount that management believes will be adequate to absorb loan losses on existing loans that may become uncollectible based on evaluations of the collectibility of loans and prior loan loss experience. The evaluations take into consideration such factors as changes in the nature and volume of the loan portfolio, overall portfolio quality, review of specific problem loans and current economic conditions that may affect the borrowers ability to pay. These estimates are particularly susceptible to changes that may result in a material adjustment to the allowance for loan losses. As adjustments become identified, they are reported in earnings for the period in which they become known. Management believes that it makes an informed judgment based upon available information.
It is the objective of PSBs evaluation process to establish the following components of the allowance for loan losses: a specific allocation for certain identified loans, a general allocation for pools of loans based on risk rating, and a general allocation for inherent loan portfolio losses. Management performs current evaluations of its criticized and classified loan portfolios and assigns specific reserves that reflect the current risk to PSB. A general reserve allocation is applied for pools of loans based on risk rating for all loans not specifically reserved for as described previously. The methodology used to calculate the provision is consistent with the guidance provided in SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 102. Management reviews the adequacy of its allowance on an ongoing basis and will provide, as management may deem necessary, for additional provisions in future periods.
PSB accounts for its impaired loans in accordance with SFAS No. 114, Accounting by Creditors for Impairment of a Loan, as amended by SFAS No. 118, Accounting by Creditors for Impairment of a Loan - - Income Recognition and Disclosures. This standard requires that a creditor measure impairment based on the present value of expected future cash flow discounted at the loans effective interest rate, except that, as a practical expedient, a creditor may measure impairment based on a loans observable market price, or the fair value of the collateral if the loan is collateral dependent. Regardless of the measurement method, a creditor must measure impairment based on the fair value of the collateral when the creditor determines that foreclosure is probable.
Non-interest Income
Non-interest income consists of service charges, rental income, other income, and gain on the sale of loans and securities. Non-interest income for the Bank increased $459,000 or 97.00% to $932,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2005, from $473,000 for the same period in the prior year. The significant increase in non-interest income in the first quarter of 2005 was almost exclusively attributable to the gain on the sale of investment securities held by PSA Service Corp.
The following table provides a summary of non-interest income, by category of income, for the three months ended March 31, 2005, and 2004 (in thousands):
|
|
Three months ended March 31, |
|
||||
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
||
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Service fees on deposit accounts |
|
$ |
322 |
|
$ |
276 |
|
Loss on sale of real estate owned |
|
(38 |
) |
(2 |
) |
||
Banked owned life insurance |
|
115 |
|
76 |
|
||
Gain on sale of investments |
|
420 |
|
|
|
||
Other |
|
113 |
|
123 |
|
||
Total |
|
$ |
932 |
|
$ |
473 |
|
12
Non-interest Expense
Non-interest expense for the Bank increased $618,000 or 14.63%, to $4.7 million for the three months ended March 31, 2005, from $4.1 million for the same period in the prior year. The primary reasons for the increase in non-interest expense were increases in salaries and employee benefits and occupancy and equipment expense and other operating expenses related to expenditures for the Banks new branch in the Chinatown section of Philadelphia.
13
The following table provides a summary of non-interest expense, by category of expense, for the three months ended March 31, 2005, and 2004:
|
|
Three months ended March 31, |
|
||||
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
||
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Salaries and employment benefits |
|
$ |
2,448 |
|
$ |
2,221 |
|
Rent and occupancy expense |
|
648 |
|
564 |
|
||
Professional fees |
|
300 |
|
160 |
|
||
FDIC insurance expense |
|
30 |
|
48 |
|
||
General insurance |
|
81 |
|
82 |
|
||
Advertising |
|
47 |
|
34 |
|
||
Data processing fees |
|
100 |
|
107 |
|
||
Director fees |
|
68 |
|
69 |
|
||
Other operating expense |
|
986 |
|
805 |
|
||
Total |
|
$ |
4,708 |
|
$ |
4,090 |
|
Provision for Income Taxes
Income tax provisions for the three month periods ended March 31, 2005 and 2004 were $246,000 and $238,000, respectively.
Liquidity
The maintenance of adequate liquidity and the mitigation of interest rate risk are integral to the management of PSBs balance sheet. Liquidity represents the ability to meet potential cash outflows resulting from deposit customers who need to withdraw funds or borrowers who need available credit. PSBs liquidity is quantified through the use of a standard liquidity ratio of liquid assets (cash and cash equivalents, investment securities available-for-sale, mortgage-backed securities available-for-sale and Federal Home Loan Bank stock) to short-term borrowings plus deposits.
PSBs asset/liability management committee monitors the level of short-term assets and liabilities to maintain an appropriate balance between liquidity, risk, and return. Liquidity is derived from various sources which include increases in core deposits, sales of certificates of deposits, the amortization, and prepayment of loans and mortgage-backed securities, and maturities of investment securities and other short-term investments. The liquidity position of PSB is also strengthened by a $201.7 million credit facility with the Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB). Advances are secured by FHLB stock and qualifying mortgage loans. PSB had no outstanding borrowings from the FHLB as of March 31, 2005.
Maximizing cash flow over time is crucial to the maintenance of adequate liquidity. PSBs total cash flow is a product of its operating activities, investing activities and financing activities. During the three months ended March 31, 2005, net cash provided by operating activities was $4.3 million, compared to net cash used in operating activities of $332,000 for the same period of 2004. During the three months ended March 31, 2005, net cash provided by investing activities was $3.5 million, compared to net cash provided by investing activities of $5.1 million for the same period of 2004. Financing activities provided net cash of $11.3 million during the three months ended March 31, 2005, compared to $20.0 million in net cash provided by financing activities for the same period of 2004. The net result of these items was an $11.3 million increase in cash and cash equivalents for the three months ended March 31, 2005, compared to a $24.8 million increase in cash and cash equivalents for the same period of 2004.
Interest Rate Sensitivity
Interest rate sensitivity focuses on the impact of fluctuating interest rates and the re-pricing characteristics of rate sensitive assets and liabilities on net interest income. Interest rate sensitivity is closely related to liquidity since each is directly affected by the maturity of assets and liabilities. Rate sensitivity also deals with exposure to fluctuations in interest rates and its effect on net interest income. The primary function of PSBs interest rate sensitivity management is to reduce exposure to interest rate risk through an appropriate balance between interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities. The goal is to minimize fluctuations in the net interest margin of PSB due to general changes in interest rates.
14
The blending of fixed and floating-rate loans and investments to match the re-pricing and maturity characteristics of the various funding sources is a continuous process in an attempt to minimize any significant fluctuations in net interest income. The composition of the balance sheet is designed to minimize any significant fluctuation in net interest income and to maximize liquidity. Management believes that the accessibility to FHLB borrowings will provide the flexibility to assist in keeping fluctuations in net interest income under control and to maintain an adequate liquidity position.
Capital Adequacy
PSB is required to maintain minimum ratios of Tier I and total capital to total risk weighted assets and a minimum Tier I leverage ratio, as defined by the banking regulators. At March 31, 2005, PSB was required to have a minimum Tier I and total capital ratios of 6.0% and 10.0%, respectively, and a minimum Tier I leverage ratio of 5.0%. PSBs actual Tier I and total capital ratios at March 31, 2005, were 14.59% and 15.49%, respectively, and PSBs Tier I leverage ratio was 9.73%. These ratios exceed the requirements for classification as a well capitalized institution, the industrys highest capital category.
On March 31, 2005, PSB was in compliance with regulatory capital requirements as shown in the following table:
|
|
Well |
|
At March 31, 2005 |
|
At December 31, 2004 |
|
||||||||
|
|
Ratios |
|
PSB |
|
Bank |
|
PSB |
|
Bank |
|
||||
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
||||||||||||
Tier I Capital |
|
|
|
$ |
51,940 |
|
$ |
40,768 |
|
$ |
51,207 |
|
$ |
39,938 |
|
Tier II Capital |
|
|
|
3,201 |
|
3,201 |
|
3,157 |
|
3,157 |
|
||||
Total Qualifying Capital |
|
|
|
$ |
55,141 |
|
$ |
43,969 |
|
$ |
54,364 |
|
$ |
43,095 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Risk Adjusted Total Assets |
|
|
|
$ |
355,990 |
|
$ |
352,487 |
|
$ |
351,023 |
|
$ |
349,124 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Tier I Risk Based Capital Ratio |
|
6.00 |
% |
14.59 |
% |
11.57 |
% |
14.59 |
% |
11.44 |
% |
||||
Total Risk Based Capital Ratio |
|
10.00 |
% |
15.49 |
% |
12.47 |
% |
15.49 |
% |
12.34 |
% |
||||
Leverage Ratio |
|
5.00 |
% |
9.73 |
% |
7.67 |
% |
9.53 |
% |
7.48 |
% |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Average Assets |
|
|
|
$ |
533,907 |
|
$ |
531,509 |
|
$ |
537,232 |
|
$ |
534,026 |
|
FINANCIAL CONDITION
General
PSBs total assets increased $4.4 million from $533.1 at December 31, 2004, to $537.5 million, as of March 31, 2005 an increase of 0.82%. Net loans outstanding decreased by $775,000 or 0.22%, and cash and cash equivalents grew by 20.48% to $65.9 million during the three months of 2005. The increase in loans was funded by an increase in deposits primarily through increases in certificates of deposit. Total deposits equaled $479.3 million, an increase of $4.0 million or 0.84% during 2005. At March 31, 2005, PSBs net loan portfolio totaled $352.2 million compared to $353.0 million at December 31, 2004.
15
The following tables summarize the loan portfolio of PSB by loan category and amount at March 31, 2005, compared to December 31, 2004, respectively. From time to time, TransNational Mortgage Corp., a subsidiary of PSB, has originated and sold mortgage loans to first party investors within PSBs financial reporting periods. Similarly, student loans are frequently originated and sold within PSBs financial reporting periods. Such mortgage and student loans are not reflected in the financial tables and financial statements pertaining to a particular period to the extent that such loans were sold prior to any period end. The loan categories correspond to PSBs general classifications (Dollars in thousands):
|
|
At March 31, |
|
At December 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
Amount |
|
Percent |
|
Amount |
|
Percent |
|
Variance |
|
% Change |
|
|||
Real Estate Loans(1): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
One-to-four family(2) |
|
$ |
136,770 |
|
38.47 |
% |
$ |
140,459 |
|
39.43 |
% |
$ |
(3,689 |
) |
(2.63 |
)% |
Construction loans |
|
31,223 |
|
8.78 |
% |
21,854 |
|
6.13 |
% |
9,369 |
|
42.87 |
% |
|||
Five or more family residential |
|
17,586 |
|
4.95 |
% |
18,888 |
|
5.30 |
% |
(1,302 |
) |
(6.89 |
)% |
|||
Nonresidential |
|
127,286 |
|
35.81 |
% |
132,066 |
|
37.07 |
% |
(4,780 |
) |
(3.62 |
)% |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Commercial loans |
|
20,819 |
|
5.86 |
% |
21,439 |
|
6.02 |
% |
(620 |
) |
(2.89 |
)% |
|||
Consumer loans |
|
21,801 |
|
6.13 |
% |
21,516 |
|
6.04 |
% |
285 |
|
1.32 |
% |
|||
Total loans |
|
$ |
355,485 |
|
100.00 |
% |
$ |
356,222 |
|
100.00 |
% |
$ |
(737 |
) |
(0.21 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Less: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Unearned fees and discounts |
|
$ |
74 |
|
|
|
$ |
80 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses |
|
3,201 |
|
|
|
3,157 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Net Loans |
|
$ |
352,210 |
|
|
|
352,985 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) Real Estate Loans represent loans secured by real estate
(2) Does not include loans held for sale
The following table summarizes loan portfolio of PSB by loan type and amount at March 31, 2005, and December 31, 2005.
|
|
At March 31 |
|
At December 31, |
|
||||||
|
|
Amount |
|
Percent |
|
Amount |
|
Percent |
|
||
Fixed rates |
|
$ |
248,417 |
|
69.88 |
% |
$ |
252,659 |
|
70.93 |
% |
Adjustable rate |
|
107,068 |
|
30.12 |
% |
103,563 |
|
29.07 |
% |
||
Total loans |
|
$ |
355,485 |
|
100.00 |
% |
$ |
356,222 |
|
100.00 |
% |
Total investment securities decreased $4.5 million, or 4.94%, to $91.1 million at March 31, 2005, from $95.6 million at December 31, 2004.
The Banks business strategies have been directed to increasing the attractiveness of our core deposit products. As we continue to execute this strategy we expect that it will provide the Bank with greater flexibility to react to changes in the interest rate environment
Asset Quality
Non-Performing Assets
PSBs level of non-performing assets decreased $143,000 or 4.87% to $3.9 million at March 31, 2005, from $4.1 million at December 31, 2004. As a matter of policy, the accrual of loan interest is discontinued if management believes that, after considering economic and business conditions and collection efforts, the borrowers financial condition is such that collection of interest becomes doubtful. This is normally done when a loan reaches 90 days delinquent. At this time, all accrued but unpaid interest is reversed. There are occasional exceptions if the loans are in the process of collection and the loan is fully secured.
16
The following table sets forth non-performing assets as of March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004:
|
|
At March 31, |
|
At December 31, |
|
||
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Loans past due 90 days or more as to interest or principal and accruing interest |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Nonaccrual loans |
|
2,863 |
|
3,633 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Total nonperforming loans |
|
2,863 |
|
3,633 |
|
||
Real estate owned (REO) |
|
1,049 |
|
422 |
|
||
Total nonperforming assets |
|
$ |
3,912 |
|
$ |
4,055 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Nonperforming loans to total loans |
|
0.81 |
% |
1.02 |
% |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Nonperforming assets to total assets |
|
0.73 |
% |
0.76 |
% |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Allowance for loan losses to total loans |
|
0.90 |
% |
0.90 |
% |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Allowance for loan losses to nonperforming loans |
|
111.81 |
% |
86.90 |
% |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Allowance for loan losses to nonperforming assets |
|
81.83 |
% |
77.85 |
% |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Net charge-offs as a percentage of total loans |
|
0.04 |
% |
0.04 |
% |
Note: Total loans includes loans held for sale
There has been no material change in PSBs assessment of its sensitivity to market risk since its presentation in the 2004 Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
PSBs management conducted an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of PSBs Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of PSBs disclosure controls and procedures as of March 31, 2005. Based on this evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that PSBs disclosure controls and procedures are effective in alerting them in a timely manner to material information required to be included in PSBs SEC reports. In addition, PSBs management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, reviewed PSBs internal controls, and there have been no significant changes in PSBs internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect those controls subsequent to the date of their last evaluation.
Following is a summary of the various claims and lawsuits involving PSB Bancorp, Inc. (PSB) other than the usual ordinary course of business claims to enforce liens, foreclosure proceedings on properties in which PSB holds security interests, claims involving the making and servicing of real property loans, and other issues incident to PSBs business.
In October 1999, in connection with the acquisition of First Bank of Philadelphia (FBP), each outstanding share of FBP was exchanged for .857 shares of PSB common stock. In addition, under the terms of the merger agreement, options to acquire 1,612,500 shares of FBP were to be converted into options to acquire 1,381,912 shares of PSB common stock. In the fourth quarter of 2001, PSB declared 1,371,200 options previously issued by FBP and converted to PSB options in the merger to be void because PSB believed, among other reasons, that these options were unlawfully and improperly granted. The following actions are either related to the voiding of such options or were initiated by plaintiffs involved directly or indirectly in the option litigation or counsel for such plaintiffs.
17
A. On March 6, 2002, Carl Lingle, Raymond Silverstein as Trustee under an Irrevocable Trust, Conwell Ltd. Partnership, Gerald Lehrfeld, Joan Lehrfeld, Jay Roseman, and Lynn Roseman, purported option holders, brought an action in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania (the Court) to have 895,240 of the options previously voided by PSB declared valid and enforceable.
On March 31, 2004, the Court granted the plaintiffs motion for summary judgment. PSB appealed the Courts decision to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit (the Appeals Court). Subsequently, on February 15, 2005, the Appeals Court upheld the grant of summary judgment for the plaintiffs. On February 28, 2005, PSB filed a petition for rehearing with the Appeals Court in which PSB averred that, based on recently discovered information, the court lacked jurisdiction because at least one of the plaintiffs was a Pennsylvania resident and therefore diversity of citizenship was absent.
On April 1, 2005, the Appeals Court granted PSBs petition for rehearing, vacated its prior ruling, dismissed the case for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and remanded the case to the Court with instructions to dismiss the underlying case for lack of subject matter. On April 26, 2005, the Court dismissed the original case for lack of subject matter jurisdiction (the Dismissal).
B. On June 17, 2004, Hal Shaffer, a purported option holder filed an action in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania seeking among other actions a declaratory judgment that 342,800 of the options previously declared invalid by PSB were valid and enforceable. On February 28, 2005, PSB filed a motion to dismiss which was subsequently denied by the Court. On April 25, 2005, PSB filed a motion for reconsideration. PSB intends to defend vigorously the action. However, there can be no assurance regarding the eventual outcome of this litigation.
C. On September 7, 2004, Conwell Ltd. Partnership, a purported option holder filed an action in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania seeking among other actions a declaratory judgment that 133,160 of the options previously declared invalid by PSB are valid and enforceable. The plaintiff filed a motion for summary judgment that was denied. On February 28, 2005, PSB filed a motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. In response, the plaintiff filed a motion to be allowed to transfer the purported options to Lynn Roseman. Oral argument was held on March 30, 2005. PSB intends to defend vigorously the action. However, there can be no assurance regarding the eventual outcome of this litigation.
D. On December 29, 2004, PSB received a shareholder demand letter (the Demand Letter) on behalf of several purported shareholders alleging that certain of PSBs officers, directors and employees engaged in a pattern and practice of acts of waste of corporate assets and failed to make certain required public disclosures. The purported acts related to failure to disclose certain information in PSBs Securities Exchange Act of 1934 reports filed with the SEC, incomplete or inaccurate financial reporting, certain actions taken by directors related to the merger of PSB and Jade Financial Corp., and issues related to PSBs decision to void the FBP options. On January 20, 2005, the board of directors of PSB appointed a special committee composed of three independent directors. The independent directors appointed to the special committee are Dennis Wesley, James W. Eastwood, and James Kenney. The special committee was charged with (i) investigating the allegations in the Demand Letter, (ii) preparing and presenting a report to the full board of directors of the results of their investigation, and (iii) making a recommendation to the full board of directors as to whether or not to proceed with a shareholder derivative action. The special committee has engaged separate legal counsel to assist it in the preparation of its report.
E. On March 17, 2005, Raymond Silverstein, as Trustee under an Irrevocable Trust dated April 1, 1993, and Carl Lingle, as shareholders suing derivatively in the name and right of PSB, filed an action in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania against PSB and each individual member of the board of directors seeking among other things a judgment declaring the 2001 PSB Stock Incentive Plan (the Plan) and certain options granted pursuant to the Plan to be null and void. The plaintiffs contend that PSBs board of directors breached their fiduciary duty and engaged in self-dealing by knowingly disavowing 1,317,200 options granted in the acquisition of First Bank of Philadelphia which they knew were valid and subsequently soliciting and obtaining the approval of PSBs shareholders for the Plan to allow for the granting of new options to PSBs board of directors and executive management. On April 29, 2005, PSB filed a motion to dismiss the cases. PSB unequivocally denies the allegations contained in the action and intends to defend vigorously the action. However, there can be no assurance regarding the eventual outcome of this litigation.
F. On April 8, 2005, PSB filed a declaratory judgment action in the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County against the various purported option holders seeking an order declaring the disputed options void and invalid.
G. On April 15, 2005, in response to the Dismissal, Carl Lingle, Raymond Silverstein, as Trustee under an Irrevocable Trust, Gerald Lehrfeld, Joan Lehrfeld, Jay Roseman and Lynn Roseman, purported option holders, filed an action
18
in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania seeking among other actions a declaratory judgment that 854,858 options previously declared invalid by PSB are valid and enforceable or in the alternative an award of money damages estimated to be not less than $11 million. PSB intends to defend vigorously the action. However, there can be no assurance regarding the eventual outcome of this litigation.
Additional information related to these actions is contained in PSBs previously filed reports on Forms 10-K, 10-Q and 8-K.
None
Not Applicable
None
None
(a) Exhibits.
31.1 Certification of Anthony DiSandro pursuant to Section 312 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
31.2 Certification of John Carrozza pursuant to Section 312 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
19
32 Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto dully authorized.
|
PSB BANCORP, INC. |
|
|
|
|
|
By: |
/s/Anthony DiSandro |
|
|
Anthony DiSandro, |
|
|
President, Chief Executive Officer, and Director |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By: |
/s/John Carrozza |
|
|
John Carrozza, |
|
|
Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
(Principal Financial Officer and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 16, 2005 |
|
|
20
EXHIBIT INDEX
Exhibit No. |
|
Document |
|
|
|
31.1 |
|
Certification of Anthony DiSandro pursuant to Section 312 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
31.2 |
|
Certification of John Carrozza pursuant to Section 312 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
32 |
|
Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
21