Back to GetFilings.com



 

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C.  20549

 

FORM 10-Q

 

(Mark One)

 

 

 

 

 

ý

 

QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

For the Quarterly Period Ended March 31, 2005

 

or

 

o

 

TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

For the Transition Period From                to                

 

Commission File Number 333-120979-49

 

Foundation Coal Corporation

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)

 

Delaware

 

26-0085077

(State or Other Jurisdiction of
Incorporation or Organization)

 

(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)

 

 

 

999 Corporate Boulevard, Suite 300
Linthicum Heights, Maryland

 

21090

(Address of Principal Executive Offices)

 

(Zip Code)

 

 

 

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code) (410) 689-7500

 

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ý  No o

 

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o  No ý

 

The Registrant’s common equity is not publicly traded. The common stock of the Registrant’s ultimate parent, Foundation Coal Holdings, Inc., began trading on the New York Stock Exchange on December 9, 2004. There were 44,627,047 shares of Foundation Coal Holdings, Inc. common stock outstanding on April 30, 2005. There were 100 shares of Foundation Coal Corporation common stock outstanding on April 30, 2005 which are not publicly traded and are all held by it’s parent FC 2 Corp.

 

 



 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

 

 

Page

PART I-FINANCIAL INFORMATION

 

ITEM 1.

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

 

Statements of Consolidated Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss)

3

 

Consolidated Balance Sheets

4

 

Statements of Consolidated Cash Flows

5

 

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

6

ITEM 2.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

21

ITEM 3.

QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

36

ITEM 4.

CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

36

 

 

 

PART II-OTHER INFORMATION

 

 

 

ITEM 1.

LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

38

ITEM 2.

UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

38

ITEM 3.

DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES

38

ITEM 4.

SUBMISSION OF MATTERS OF VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS

38

ITEM 5.

OTHER INFORMATION

38

ITEM 6.

EXHIBITS

38

 

2



 

PART I-FINANCIAL INFORMATION

 

Unless the context otherwise indicates, as used in this Form 10-Q the terms “we”, “our”, “us” and similar terms refer to Foundation Coal Corporation and its consolidated subsidiaries.

 

ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

Foundation Coal Corporation and Subsidiaries
(An Indirect Wholly Owned Subsidiary of Foundation Coal Holdings, Inc.)

Statements of Consolidated Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss)

(Dollars in thousands)

(Unaudited)

 

 

 

Three Months Ended March 31,

 

 

 

2005
Successor

 

2004
Predecessor

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Revenues:

 

 

 

 

 

Coal sales

 

$

300,021

 

$

221,979

 

Other revenue

 

5,485

 

4,328

 

 

 

305,506

 

226,307

 

Costs and expenses:

 

 

 

 

 

Cost of coal sales (excludes depreciation, depletion and amortization)

 

215,230

 

197,160

 

Selling, general and administrative expense (excludes depreciation, depletion and amortization)

 

11,431

 

10,411

 

Accretion on asset retirement obligation

 

2,040

 

1,723

 

Depreciation, depletion and amortization

 

54,800

 

25,017

 

Amortization of coal supply agreements

 

(23,379

)

3,966

 

Income (loss) from operations

 

45,384

 

(11,970

)

Other income (expense):

 

 

 

 

 

Interest expense

 

(14,253

)

(9,971

)

Loss on termination of hedge accounting for interest rate swaps

 

 

(48,772

)

Mark-to-market loss on interest rate swap

 

 

(3,166

)

Interest income

 

122

 

773

 

Income (loss) before income tax (expense) benefit

 

31,253

 

(73,106

)

Income tax (expense) benefit

 

(12,211

)

27,012

 

Income (loss) from continuing operations

 

19,042

 

(46,094

)

Income from discontinued operations, net of income tax expense of $1,636 in 2004

 

 

2,792

 

Net income (loss)

 

19,042

 

(43,302

)

Components of comprehensive income:

 

 

 

 

 

Unrealized gain on interest rate swap, net of tax expense of $553 in 2005 and $16,890 in 2004

 

829

 

28,820

 

Comprehensive income (loss)

 

$

19,871

 

$

(14,482

)

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

 

3



 

Foundation Coal Corporation and Subsidiaries
(An Indirect Wholly Owned Subsidiary of Foundation Coal Holdings, Inc.)
Consolidated Balance Sheets

(Dollars in thousands, except share and per share data)

 

 

 

March 31,
2005

 

December 31,
2004

 

 

 

(Unaudited)

 

 

 

ASSETS

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current assets:

 

 

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents

 

$

4,132

 

$

25,043

 

Trade accounts receivable, net of allowance ($217 in 2005 and 2004, respectively)

 

101,268

 

66,484

 

Inventories, net

 

58,311

 

39,718

 

Deferred income taxes

 

15,145

 

15,145

 

Other current assets

 

24,582

 

27,821

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total current assets

 

203,438

 

174,211

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Owned surface lands

 

28,274

 

29,171

 

Plant, equipment and mine development costs, net

 

509,101

 

487,495

 

Owned and leased mineral rights, net

 

1,245,966

 

1,282,989

 

Coal supply agreements, net

 

76,947

 

84,508

 

Other noncurrent assets

 

40,818

 

41,586

 

Total assets

 

$

2,104,544

 

$

2,099,960

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

LIABILITIES

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

Trade accounts payable

 

$

31,315

 

$

30,512

 

Accrued expenses and other current liabilities

 

159,263

 

155,541

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total current liabilities

 

190,578

 

186,053

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Long-term debt

 

685,000

 

685,000

 

Deferred income taxes

 

138,204

 

133,828

 

Coal supply agreements, net

 

147,269

 

178,210

 

Postretirement benefits

 

452,809

 

449,683

 

Other noncurrent liabilities

 

215,705

 

211,455

 

Total liabilities

 

1,829,565

 

1,844,229

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Commitments and contingencies (Note 17)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Common stock, $0.01 par value; 100 shares authorized, issued and outstanding at March 31, 2005 and at December 31, 2004

 

 

 

Additional paid-in capital

 

241,422

 

241,993

 

Retained earnings

 

33,106

 

14,064

 

Unearned restricted stock compensation

 

(52

)

 

Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)

 

503

 

(326

)

Total stockholders’ equity

 

274,979

 

255,731

 

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity

 

$

2,104,544

 

$

2,099,960

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

 

4



 

Foundation Coal Corporation and Subsidiaries
(An Indirect Wholly Owned Subsidiary of Foundation Coal Holdings, Inc.)
Statements of Consolidated Cash Flows

(Dollars in thousands)

(Unaudited)

 

 

 

Three Months Ended March 31,

 

 

 

2005
Successor

 

2004
Predecessor

 

Operating activities:

 

 

 

 

 

Net income (loss)

 

$

19,042

 

$

(43,302

)

Income from discontinued operations

 

 

(2,792

)

Income (loss) from continuing operations

 

19,042

 

(46,094

)

Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities:

 

 

 

 

 

Accretion on asset retirement obligations

 

2,040

 

1,723

 

Depreciation, depletion and amortization

 

31,421

 

28,983

 

Amortization of deferred financing costs

 

773

 

 

Gain on sale of assets

 

 

(446

)

Non-cash restricted stock compensation

 

308

 

 

Non-cash mark-to-market adjustment for interest rate swap

 

 

3,166

 

Non-cash expense from termination of hedge accounting for interest rate swap

 

 

48,772

 

Deferred income taxes

 

3,824

 

(26,874

)

Changes in operating assets and liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

Trade accounts receivable

 

(34,784

)

(172

)

Inventories, net

 

(18,593

)

(4,507

)

Other current assets

 

3,429

 

494

 

Other noncurrent assets

 

8

 

1,542

 

Trade accounts payable

 

818

 

(170

)

Accrued expenses and other current liabilities

 

(1,457

)

(10,691

)

Noncurrent liabilities and other

 

4,435

 

6,693

 

Net cash provided by continuing operations

 

11,264

 

2,419

 

Net cash provided by discontinued operations

 

 

9,570

 

Net cash provided by operating activities

 

11,264

 

11,989

 

Investing activities:

 

 

 

 

 

Purchases of property, plant and equipment

 

(36,528

)

(25,550

)

Proceeds from disposition of property, plant and equipment

 

4,353

 

1,827

 

Net cash used in continuing operations

 

(32,175

)

(23,723

)

Net cash used in discontinued operations

 

 

(126

)

Net cash used in investing activities

 

(32,175

)

(23,849

)

Financing activities:

 

 

 

 

 

Proceeds from revolving credit facility

 

39,000

 

 

Repayment of revolving credit facility

 

(39,000

)

 

Repayment of long-term debt

 

 

(17

)

Repayment of capital lease obligations

 

 

(821

)

Net decrease in cash on deposit with the Predecessor

 

 

5,362

 

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities

 

 

4,524

 

Decrease in cash and cash equivalents

 

(20,911

)

(7,336

)

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period

 

25,043

 

7,649

 

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period

 

$

4,132

 

$

313

 

Supplemental cash flow information:

 

 

 

 

 

Cash paid for interest

 

$

17,276

 

$

19,332

 

Cash paid for income taxes

 

$

7,563

 

$

3

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

 

5



 

Foundation Coal Corporation and Subsidiaries
(An Indirect Wholly Owned Subsidiary of Foundation Coal Holdings, Inc.)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited, dollars in thousands)

 

(1) Basis of Presentation of Financial Statements

 

The following interim consolidated financial statements of Foundation Coal Corporation and Subsidiaries (“FCC” or the “Company”) are unaudited and prepared in accordance with the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission for Form 10-Q. Such rules and regulations allow the omission of certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles as long as the statements are not misleading. In the opinion of management, these financial statements reflect all normal and recurring adjustments necessary for a fair presentation of the results of the periods presented. These interim consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements of the Company included in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004, filed March 31, 2005.

 

The Company’s consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The preparation of the Company’s consolidated financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. The more significant areas requiring the use of management estimates and assumptions relate to coal reserves that are the basis for future cash flow estimates and units-of-production depreciation, depletion and amortization calculations; environmental and reclamation obligations; asset impairments; post-employment, post-retirement and other employee benefit liabilities; valuation allowances for deferred taxes; reserves for contingencies and litigation; and the fair value and accounting treatment of certain financial instruments. Management bases its estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. Accordingly, actual results may differ significantly from these estimates.  In addition, different assumptions or conditions could reasonably be expected to yield different results.  The operating results for the three months ended March 31, 2005 may not necessarily be indicative of the results to be expected in future quarters for the year ended December 31, 2005.

 

Foundation Coal Holdings, Inc. and its indirect wholly owned subsidiary FCC were formed to acquire the North American coal mining assets of RAG American Coal Holding, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of RAG Coal International AG (“RAG”), which acquisition closed on July 30, 2004 (the “acquisition”).  The acquisition was accounted for using the purchase method of accounting whereby identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed were recorded at their fair market values as of the date of acquisition. The Company has performed the preliminary purchase price allocation based on the results of an independent appraisal performed by a reputable consulting firm well known in the industry. Certain judgments and estimates by the Company regarding future cash flows from individual mine sites and other plans are integral to the valuations performed by the valuation specialists. The appraisal was completed during the first quarter of 2005 and the results are being evaluated by management. The final purchase price allocation, which management anticipates will be competed in the third quarter of 2005, is not expected to vary significantly from the preliminary allocation.

 

RAG American Coal Holding, Inc. had two primary operating units: Riverton Coal Production, Inc. and subsidiaries (“RCP”) and RAG American Coal Company, LLC and subsidiaries (“RACC”). On February 29, 2004, RACC signed a definitive Stock Purchase Agreement to sell RAG Coal AG’s Colorado operations which included Twentymile Coal Company, RAG Empire Corporation, RAG Shoshone Coal Corporation and Colorado Yampa Coal Company (collectively referred to as the RAG Colorado Business Unit) to a subsidiary of Peabody Energy Corporation. This transaction closed on April 15, 2004. Accordingly, all references to Foundation Coal Corporation, exclude the RAG Colorado Business Unit which is accounted for and presented in the accompanying financial statements as discontinued operations. Prior period financial statements have also been restated to reflect the RAG Colorado Business Unit as a discontinued operation.

 

The following provides a description of the basis of presentation during all periods presented:

 

“Successor”—represents the consolidated financial position of Foundation Coal Corporation and consolidated subsidiaries as of March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004, and the consolidated results of operations and cash flows for the three

 

6



 

month period ended March 31, 2005. Foundation Coal Corporation had no significant activities until the acquisition on July 30, 2004.

 

“Predecessor”—represents the consolidated results of operations and cash flows of RAG American Coal Holding, Inc. and subsidiaries for all periods prior to the acquisition. This presentation reflects the historical basis of accounting.

 

The consolidated financial statements as of and for the period ended March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004 reflect the acquisition under the purchase method of accounting, in accordance with the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 141, Business Combinations.

 

Unless otherwise indicated, “the Company” as used throughout the remainder of these notes to the consolidated financial statements refers to both the Successor and the Predecessor.

 

Reclassifications

 

Certain amounts in the prior period have been reclassified to conform to the 2005 presentation.

 

(2) Recent Accounting Pronouncements

 

In December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued SFAS No. 123 (revised 2004), Share-Based Payment (“SFAS No. 123R”), which replaces SFAS No. 123, and supersedes APB No. 25. SFAS No. 123R requires all share-based payments to employees, including grants of employee stock options, to be recognized in the financial statements based on their fair value at the grant date. SFAS No. 123R generally requires companies to measure the cost of employee services received in exchange for an award of equity instruments (such as stock options and restricted stock) based on the grant-date fair value of the award, and to recognize that cost over the period during which the employee is required to provide service (usually the vesting period of the award).  FAS 123R also requires the benefits of tax deductions in excess of recognized compensation cost to be reported as a financing cash flow, rather than as an operating cash flow as required under current literature. This requirement will reduce net operating cash flows and increase net financing cash flows in periods after adoption. The pro forma disclosures previously permitted under SFAS No. 123 no longer will be an alternative to financial statement recognition. On April 14, 2005, the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) delayed the implementation of SFAS No. 123R from its original implementation date by six months for most registrants, requiring all public companies to adopt FAS 123R no later than the beginning of the first fiscal year beginning after June 15, 2005. The impact of adopting SFAS No. 123R cannot be predicted at this time because it will depend on levels of share-based payments granted in the future. However, had the Company adopted SFAS No. 123R during the prior period, the results are expected to be consistent with the pro forma disclosure under SFAS No. 123, except that forfeitures will be considered in the calculation of compensation expense under SFAS No. 123R. When adopted, the Company may elect to change the valuation method or assumptions and such changes could have a material impact on the amount of stock-based compensation the Company records.

 

In March 2005, the Emerging Issues Task Force reached consensus on Issue No. 04-6, Accounting for Stripping Costs in the Mining Industry (“EITF No. 04-6”) concluding that post-production stripping costs are a component of mineral inventory costs subject to the provisions of the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants Accounting Research Bulletin No. 43, Restatement and Revision of Accounting Research Bulletins, Chapter 4, Inventory Pricing, (“ARB No. 43”).  The FASB ratified the EITF consensus. Based upon this consensus, post production stripping costs are considered costs of the extracted minerals under a full absorption costing system and are recognized as a component of inventory to be recognized in costs of sales in the same period as the revenue from the sale of the inventory. In addition, capitalization of such costs would be appropriate only to the extent inventory exists at the end of a reporting period. The guidance in this consensus will be effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2005, with early adoption permitted. The Company is currently evaluating this consensus and has not determined its impact to the consolidated financial statements.

 

7



 

(3) Inventories

 

Inventories consisted of the following:

 

 

 

At March 31,
2005

 

At December 31,
2004

 

 

 

(Unaudited)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Saleable coal

 

$

20,089

 

$

11,609

 

Raw coal

 

1,208

 

2,893

 

Work-in-process (deferred overburden)

 

25,115

 

13,889

 

Materials and supplies

 

19,555

 

18,983

 

 

 

65,967

 

47,374

 

Less materials and supplies reserve for obsolescence

 

(7,656

)

(7,656

)

 

 

$

58,311

 

$

39,718

 

 

Saleable coal represents coal stockpiles ready for shipment to a customer. Raw coal represents coal that requires further processing prior to shipment. Work-in-process consists of costs incurred to remove overburden above an unmined coal seam as part of the surface mining process and generally includes labor, supplies, operating overhead and equipment costs charged to operations as coal from the seam is sold.

 

(4) Other Current Assets

 

Other current assets consisted of the following:

 

 

 

At March 31,
2005

 

At December 31,
2004

 

 

 

(Unaudited)

 

 

 

Prepaid royalties

 

$

3,681

 

$

3,142

 

Prepaid longwall move expense

 

5,913

 

7,497

 

Prepaid SO2 emission allowances

 

641

 

780

 

Prepaid expenses

 

10,571

 

12,886

 

Other

 

3,776

 

3,516

 

 

 

$

24,582

 

$

27,821

 

 

8



 

(5) Property, Plant, Equipment and Owned and Leased Mineral Rights

 

Property, plant, equipment and owned and leased mineral rights consisted of the following:

 

 

 

At March 31,
2005

 

At December 31, 2004

 

 

 

(Unaudited)

 

 

 

Owned surface and coal lands

 

 

 

 

 

Owned surface lands

 

$

28,274

 

$

29,171

 

Owned and leased mineral rights

 

$

1,333,095

 

$

1,336,557

 

Less accumulated depletion

 

87,129

 

53,568

 

 

 

$

1,245,966

 

$

1,282,989

 

Plant, equipment and mine development costs

 

 

 

 

 

Plant, equipment and asset retirement costs

 

$

559,660

 

$

518,525

 

Mine development costs

 

8,462

 

6,196

 

Coal bed methane equipment and development costs

 

3,409

 

3,959

 

 

 

571,531

 

528,680

 

Less accumulated depreciation and amortization:

 

 

 

 

 

Plant, equipment and asset retirement costs

 

61,930

 

40,898

 

Mine development costs

 

250

 

108

 

Coal bed methane equipment and development costs

 

250

 

179

 

 

 

62,430

 

41,185

 

 

 

$

509,101

 

$

487,495

 

 

(6) Other Noncurrent Assets

 

Other noncurrent assets consisted of the following:

 

 

 

At March 31,
2005

 

At December 31,
2004

 

 

 

(Unaudited)

 

 

 

Receivables from asset dispositions

 

$

4,897

 

$

5,863

 

Prepaid major repairs

 

1,168

 

737

 

Unamortized debt issuance costs, net

 

23,199

 

24,162

 

Advance mining royalties

 

2,630

 

2,620

 

Work-in-process coal inventory (deferred overburden)

 

3,576

 

3,576

 

Prepaid longwall development

 

1,633

 

1,633

 

Fair value of interest rate swaps

 

1,912

 

530

 

Other

 

1,803

 

2,465

 

 

 

$

40,818

 

$

41,586

 

 

9



 

(7) Accrued Expenses and Other Current Liabilities

 

Accrued expenses and other current liabilities consisted of the following:

 

 

 

At March 31,
2005

 

At December 31,
2004

 

 

 

(Unaudited)

 

 

 

Accrued federal and state income taxes

 

$

8,350

 

$

3,815

 

Accrued sales contract settlements

 

1,943

 

7,431

 

Wages and employee benefits

 

26,642

 

27,977

 

Pension benefits

 

6,149

 

5,970

 

Postretirement benefits other than pension

 

23,000

 

21,350

 

Interest

 

3,655

 

9,065

 

Royalties

 

9,021

 

8,657

 

Taxes other than income taxes

 

29,557

 

28,328

 

Asset retirement obligations

 

4,291

 

4,398

 

Workers’ compensation

 

9,718

 

9,717

 

Other

 

36,937

 

28,833

 

 

 

$

159,263

 

$

155,541

 

 

(8) Other Noncurrent Liabilities

 

Other noncurrent liabilities consisted of the following:

 

 

 

At March 31,
2005

 

At December 31, 2004

 

 

 

(Unaudited)

 

 

 

Postemployment benefits

 

$

5,774

 

$

6,365

 

Pension benefits

 

45,599

 

43,987

 

Workers’ compensation

 

18,506

 

18,938

 

Minimum royalty obligations

 

95

 

876

 

Black lung reserves

 

5,181

 

4,972

 

Contract settlement accrual

 

25,386

 

26,672

 

Asset retirement obligations

 

102,036

 

100,202

 

Deferred production tax

 

10,829

 

7,144

 

Deferred credits and other

 

2,299

 

2,299

 

 

 

$

215,705

 

$

211,455

 

 

(9) Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss)

 

Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) consisted of the following:

 

 

 

At March 31,
2005

 

At December 31,
2004

 

 

 

(Unaudited)

 

 

 

Changes in fair value of hedge instruments, net of tax of $553

 

$

829

 

$

 

Minimum pension liability adjustments, net of tax of $192

 

(326

)

(326

)

 

 

$

503

 

$

(326

)

 

10



 

(10) Employee Retirement and Postretirement Benefit Plans

 

Retirement Plans

 

The components of net periodic benefit cost of the defined benefit retirement plans are as follows:

 

 

 

Three Months Ended March 31,

 

 

 

2005
Successor

 

2004
Predecessor

 

Service cost

 

$

1,281

 

$

1,292

 

Interest cost

 

2,560

 

2,708

 

Expected return on plan assets

 

(2,249

)

(2,133

)

Amortization of:

 

 

 

 

 

Prior service cost

 

 

10

 

Actuarial losses

 

21

 

1,108

 

 

 

1,613

 

2,985

 

Less: amounts allocated to discontinued operations

 

 

488

 

Total from continuing operations

 

$

1,613

 

$

2,497

 

 

Postretirement Health Care and Life Insurance Benefits

 

The components of net periodic benefit cost for postretirement medical and life insurance are as follows:

 

 

 

Three Months Ended March 31,

 

 

 

2005
Successor

 

2004
Predecessor

 

Service cost

 

$

2,035

 

$

1,657

 

Interest cost

 

8,465

 

7,226

 

Amortization of:

 

 

 

 

 

Prior service cost

 

 

182

 

Actuarial losses

 

 

2,769

 

 

 

10,500

 

11,834

 

Less: amounts allocated to discontinued operations

 

 

278

 

Total from continuing operations

 

$

10,500

 

$

11,556

 

 

The Company’s postretirement medical and life insurance plans are unfunded.

 

11



 

(11) Pneumoconiosis (Black Lung) Expense and Trust

 

The components of net periodic benefit cost for the indicated periods are as follows:

 

 

 

Three Months Ended March 31,

 

 

 

2005
Successor

 

2004
Predecessor

 

Service cost

 

$

84

 

$

133

 

Interest cost

 

211

 

322

 

Expected return on plan assets

 

(145

)

(244

)

Amortization of:

 

 

 

 

 

Transition asset

 

 

(69

)

Prior service cost

 

 

34

 

Net actuarial losses

 

60

 

148

 

 

 

210

 

324

 

Less: amounts allocated to discontinued operations

 

 

12

 

Total from continuing operations

 

$

210

 

$

312

 

 

(12) Stock-Based Compensation

 

The Company records compensation expense for all employee stock-based compensation plans including those plans involving grants of Foundation Coal Holdings, Inc. common stock and options to acquire common stock to employees of FCC, using the intrinsic value method prescribed by Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees (“APB No. 25”) and related interpretations. Under APB No. 25, compensation expense is recorded over the vesting period to the extent that the fair value of the underlying stock on the date of grant exceeds the exercise or acquisition price of the stock or stock-based award. We have adopted the disclosure-only provisions of SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, (“SFAS No. 123”), as amended by SFAS No. 148 Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation—Transition and Disclosure—an amendment of FASB Statement No. 123 (“SFAS No. 148”).

 

Had compensation expense for stock options grants been determined based on the fair value at the grant dates consistent with the method required by SFAS No. 123, the Company’s net income available to common shareholders would have been changed to the pro forma amounts as indicated in the following table. The Predecessor had no stock option plans; therefore, no Predecessor information is presented.

 

 

 

Three Months
Ended March 31,
2005

 

Net income available to common shareholders, as reported

 

$

19,042

 

Add:

 

 

 

Stock-based employee compensation included in reported net income, net of related tax effects

 

188

 

Deduct:

 

 

 

Total stock-based employee compensation expense determined under fair value based method for all awards, net of related tax effects

 

(376

)

 

 

 

 

 

Pro forma net income available to common shareholders

 

$

18,854

 

 

During the quarter ended March 31, 2005, Foundation Coal Holdings, Inc. granted restricted stock performance unit awards (“performance units”) to certain key employees of FCC.  All of the performance units granted are subject to continued employment and vest on each December 31, beginning December 31, 2005 and ending on December 31, 2007 contingent upon the achievement of certain annual performance targets.  Shares of common stock are then awarded in March of the year following the final vesting period. Compensation expense of approximately $290 (pretax) was recorded for the three months ended March 31, 2005 for one-quarter of the initial year’s performance units that management expects will vest on December 31, 2005.

 

12



 

(13) Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities

 

The Predecessor entered into an interest rate swap agreement effective June 20, 1999 to manage its exposure to fluctuations in interest rates relating to its outstanding variable rate debt. The interest rate swap agreement was designated as a cash flow hedge, and was designed to be entirely effective by matching the terms of the swap agreement with the debt. The base rate for both the debt and the swap is LIBOR and the instruments have the same renewal dates over the lives of the instruments. The contract’s notional amount was $434,000 at inception, and declined semi-annually over the life of the contract in proportion to the Predecessor’s outstanding balance on its related debt. The Predecessor paid a fixed rate of 6.55% and received six-month LIBOR which reset every 180 days. The maturity date of the contract was July 30, 2009.  However, in connection with the definitive Stock Purchase Agreement for the sale of the RAG Colorado Business Unit entered into on February 29, 2004, the Predecessor notified the holders of the variable rate notes of their intention to repay the notes. Accordingly, the interest rate swaps no longer qualified for hedge accounting treatment and in the quarter ended March 31, 2004, the full amount of unrealized loss included in accumulated other comprehensive income was recognized in net income. The Predecessor settled the interest rate swaps in April 2004. Between February 29, 2004 and March 31, 2004, mark-to-market losses on the interest rate swaps were $3,166 and were included in other income.

 

On September 30, 2004, the Successor entered into pay-fixed, receive-variable interest rate swap agreements on a notional amount of $85,000. The term of these swaps is for three years. Under these swaps, the Company receives a variable rate of three month US dollar LIBOR and pays a fixed rate of 3.26%. Settlement of interest payments occurs quarterly. The Company was required to enter into these swaps in order to maintain at least 50% of its outstanding debt at a fixed rate as required by the Senior Credit Facility. These swap agreements essentially convert $85,000 of the Company’s variable rate borrowings under the Senior Credit Facility to fixed rate borrowings for a three year period beginning September 30, 2004. Effective January 1, 2005, the Company designated these interest rate swaps as cash flow hedges of the variable interest payments due on $85,000 of its variable rate date through September 2007 under SFAS No 133, Accounting for Derivative Financial Instruments and Hedging Activities upon completion of the effectiveness testing and related documentation. As of March 31, 2005, the fair value of this cash flow hedge was $1,912 which was recorded as a noncurrent asset and the offsetting unrealized gain of $829, net of tax expense was recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income. At December 31, 2004, the fair value of these swaps was $530 which was recorded as a noncurrent asset.

 

(14) Asset Retirement Obligations

 

The Company’s mining activities are subject to various federal and state laws and regulations governing the protection of the environment. These laws and regulations are continually changing and are generally becoming more restrictive. The Company conducts its operations so as to protect the public health and environment and believes its operations are in compliance with all applicable laws and regulations. The Company has made, and expects to make in the future, expenditures to comply with such laws and regulations, but cannot predict the amount of such future expenditures. Estimated future reclamation costs are based principally on legal and regulatory requirements.

 

The following table is a reconciliation of the Company’s asset retirement obligation (“ARO”) liability from January 1, 2005 through March 31, 2005:

 

Asset retirement obligation, January 1, 2005

 

$

104,600

 

Accretion expense

 

2,040

 

Revisions in estimated cash flows

 

120

 

Payments

 

(433

)

Asset retirement obligation, March 31, 2005

 

$

106,327

 

 

The current portions of the asset retirement obligation liabilities of $ 4,291 and $ 4,398 at March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004, respectively, are included in accrued expenses and other current liabilities as illustrated in Note 7. There were no assets that were legally restricted for purposes of settling asset retirement obligations at March 31, 2005 or December 31, 2004, respectively.

 

13



 

(15) Segment Information:

 

The Company produces primarily steam coal from surface and deep mines for sale to utility and industrial customers. The Company operates only in the United States with mines in all of the major coal basins. The Company has three reportable business segments: Northern Appalachia, consisting of two underground mines in southwestern Pennsylvania, Central Appalachia, consisting of 6 underground mines and two surface mines in southern West Virginia and the Powder River Basin, consisting of two surface mines in Wyoming. Corporate, Other and Eliminations includes an underground mine in Illinois, centralized sales functions, corporate overhead, business development activities, expenses for closed mines and the elimination of intercompany transactions. The Company evaluates the performance of its segments based on operating income.

 

Successor:

 

Operating segment results for the three months ended March 31, 2005 are as follows:

 

 

 

Powder
River
Basin

 

Northern
Appalachia

 

Central
Appalachia

 

Other

 

Consolidated

 

Revenues

 

$

82,576

 

$

113,989

 

$

85,626

 

$

23,315

 

$

305,506

 

Income from operations

 

5,558

 

42,472

 

12,970

 

(15,616

)

45,384

 

Depreciation, depletion and amortization

 

19,556

 

19,585

 

13,837

 

1,822

 

54,800

 

Amortization of coal supply agreements

 

4,643

 

(16,501

)

(12,115

)

594

 

(23,379

)

Capital expenditures

 

10,049

 

13,263

 

12,761

 

455

 

36,528

 

Total assets

 

$

591,194

 

$

943,985

 

$

486,740

 

$

82,625

 

$

2,104,544

 

 

Predecessor:

 

Operating segment results for the three months ended March 31, 2004 are as follows:

 

 

 

Powder
River
Basin

 

Northern
Appalachia

 

Central
Appalachia

 

Other

 

Consolidated

 

Revenues

 

$

79,791

 

$

54,537

 

$

67,002

 

$

24,977

 

$

226,307

 

Income from operations

 

12,720

 

(11,416

)

 

(13,274

)

(11,970

)

Depreciation, depletion and amortization

 

4,671

 

11,009

 

7,808

 

1,529

 

25,017

 

Amortization of coal supply agreements

 

3,389

 

133

 

 

444

 

3,966

 

Capital expenditures

 

8,269

 

11,049

 

4,147

 

2,085

 

25,550

 

Total assets

 

$

420,978

 

$

637,641

 

$

250,508

 

$

531,161

 

$

1,840,288

 

 

Reconciliation of segment income from operations to consolidated income (loss) before income tax expense (benefit) is as follows:

 

 

 

Three Months Ended March 31,

 

 

 

2005
Successor

 

2004
Predecessor

 

Total segment income (loss) from operations

 

$

45,384

 

$

(11,970

)

Interest expense

 

(14,253

)

(9,971

)

Loss on termination of hedge accounting for interest rate swaps

 

 

(48,772

)

Mark-to-market gain on interest rate swaps

 

 

(3,166

)

Interest income

 

122

 

773

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income (loss) before income tax expense (benefit)

 

$

31,253

 

$

(73,106

)

 

14



 

(16) Other Revenue

 

Other revenue consisted of the following:

 

 

 

Three Months Ended March 31,

 

 

 

2005
Successor

 

2004
Predecessor

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Royalty income

 

$

177

 

$

823

 

Synfuel fees

 

1,377

 

1,000

 

Coalbed methane

 

1,337

 

137

 

Transloading and plant processing fees

 

1,130

 

358

 

Gain on disposition of assets

 

 

446

 

Other

 

1,464

 

1,564

 

 

 

$

5,485

 

$

4,328

 

 

(17) Commitments and Contingencies

 

Asset Retirement Obligations (formerly Reclamation and Mine Closure)

 

At March 31, 2005, the Company’s accruals for reclamation and mine closure totaled $106,327. The portion of the costs expected to be incurred within a year of $4,291 at March 31, 2005 is included in accrued expenses and other current liabilities. At March 31, 2005, these regulatory obligations are secured by surety bonds in the amount of $230,249.  These surety bonds are partially collateralized by letters of credit issued by the Company.

 

Guarantees

 

One of our former parent companies, Cyprus Amax Minerals Company, remains a guarantor with regard to future minimum royalties payable under leases through the first quarter 2006 to Blackhawk Coal Company, an affiliate of American Electric Power. Under the terms of the Stock Purchase Agreement, dated May 12, 1999 between RAG Coal International AG and Cyprus Amax Mineral Company, the Predecessor guaranteed Cyprus Amax’ performance under this obligation by issuing an irrevocable letter of credit to secure the minimum royalty payments still due. The Company assumed this guarantee in the acquisition. The amount of this letter of credit is reduced as the Company makes the scheduled payments. At  March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004, the letter of credit amount was $5,000 and $6,000, respectively.

 

Neweagle Industries, Inc. (“Neweagle”) is a wholly-owned indirect subsidiary of the Company. Starting in early 2001, Neweagle supplied and sold coal to Arch Coal Sales Company, Inc. (“Arch Sales”) pursuant to a Conditional Coal Supply Agreement dated October 1, 1996 (CCSA). This coal was in turn resold by Arch Sales under a separate and distinct Coal Sales Agreement dated October 1, 1989 (“Rocky Mount Contract”) with Cogentrix of Rocky Mount, Inc. (“Cogentrix”) as the buyer. On March 23, 2003, the Predecessor (now known as Foundation American Coal Holding, Inc.) conditionally issued to Arch Sales a Guaranty and Indemnity (“Guaranty”) of Neweagle’s performance under the CCSA, and also agreed to indemnify Arch Sales and its affiliates and other parties for any liability related to the Rocky Mount Contract. As part of a global settlement of litigation relating to numerous issues between affiliates of the Predecessor and Arch Sales, a Mutual Release and Settlement Agreement (“MRSA”) was executed and effective November 12, 2004. Pursuant to the MRSA, the CCSA and the Guaranty were terminated. Also pursuant to the MRSA, Neweagle agreed to continue selling and supplying coal to Arch in the quantities required under the Rocky Mount Contract for re-sale by Arch to Cogentrix thereunder. The MRSA also was executed by the Predecessor, (now known as Foundation American Coal Holding, Inc.) As a signatory to the MRSA, Foundation American Coal Holding, Inc. and Neweagle agreed to indemnify, defend, and save harmless Arch and its affiliates from any non-performance, default or breach of (i) Neweagle’s obligation to supply coal to Arch Sales under the MSRA and (ii) for so long as the MRSA remains in force, any default, breach, or non-fulfillment of Arch Sales contract obligations under the Rocky Mount Contract as a result of acts or omissions (other than by Cogentrix) occurring on or after November 12, 2004.

 

15



 

Neweagle Industries, Inc., Neweagle Coal Sales Corp., Laurel Creek Co., Inc. and Rockspring Development, Inc. (“Sellers”) are wholly-owned indirect subsidiaries of the Company. The Sellers sell coal to Birchwood Power Partners, L.P. (“Birchwood”) under a Coal Supply Agreement dated July 22, 1993 (Birchwood Contract). Laurel Creek Co., Inc. and Rockspring Development, Inc. were parties to the Birchwood Contract since its inception, at which time those entities were not affiliated with Neweagle Industries, Inc., Neweagle Coal Sales Corp., or the Company. Effective January 31, 1994, the Birchwood Contract was assigned to Neweagle Industries, Inc. and Neweagle Coal Sales Corp. by AgipCoal Holding USA, Inc. and AgipCoal Sales USA, Inc., which at the time were affiliates of Arch Coal, Inc. Despite this assignment, Arch Coal, Inc. (“Arch”) and its affiliates have separate contractual obligations to provide coal to Birchwood if Sellers fail to perform. Pursuant to an Agreement & Release dated September 30, 1997, the Predecessor (now known as Foundation American Coal Holding, Inc.) agreed to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless Arch and its subsidiaries from and against any claims arising out of any failure of Sellers to perform under the Birchwood Contract. By acknowledgement dated February 16, 2005, the Predecessor and Arch acknowledged the continuing validity and effect of the Agreement & Release dated September 30, 1997.

 

In the normal course of business, the Company is a party to guarantees and financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk, such as bank letters of credit, performance or surety bonds and other guarantees and indemnities, which are not reflected in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. Such financial instruments are valued based on the amount of exposure under the instrument and likelihood of performance being required. In the Company’s past experience, no claims have been made against these financial instruments. Management does not expect any material losses to result from these guarantees or off-balance-sheet instruments and, therefore, is of the opinion that their fair value is zero.

 

Contingencies

 

Three of our subsidiaries were named as defendants in six separate complaints filed in Raleigh and Wyoming Counties, West Virginia, in late 2001, alleging personal injury and property damage caused by flooding on or about July 8, 2001. Similar suits may be filed in the future based on this or subsequent weather events. The general alleged basis for the lawsuits is that coal mining, oil and gas drilling and timbering operations altered the topography in the area to such an extent that flooding resulting from heavy rains caused more severe damage than would have otherwise resulted. Numerous similar complaints were filed by hundreds of plaintiffs against over 100 defendants, in a total of seven southern West Virginia counties. All such civil actions have been referred by the West Virginia Supreme Court to a three-judge panel, sitting in Raleigh County, pursuant to the Court’s Mass Litigation Rule.

 

On December 9, 2004, the West Virginia Supreme Court issued an opinion addressing certain questions of law certified to it by the three-judge panel. Among other rulings, the Supreme Court decision held that plaintiffs may not proceed under a strict liability theory, as had been asserted in their complaints. The court also held that where damages can be shown to have been caused by an unusual act of nature combined with the conduct of a defendant, the defendant should be given an opportunity to show by clear and convincing evidence that it caused only a portion of those damages, in order to avoid incurring liability for all damages.

 

Pursuant to an existing order, no formal discovery has taken place in any of these cases, and the filing of cross-claims, counterclaims and third-party actions was stayed. In March 2005 the three judge panel issued a scheduling order indicating that six different trials will be held, one for each watershed impacted. Each trial will be held in two phases with the liability phase being held first, and then a damages phase. The first trial is currently scheduled to commence in March 2006. This will relate to flooding in the Upper Guyandotte River watershed in which our affiliates do have operations.

 

The claims against our entities are covered by insurance. Common defense counsel and experts are representing numerous defendants and costs are being shared. While the outcome of litigation is subject to uncertainties, based on our preliminary evaluation of the issues and the potential impact on us, we believe this matter will be resolved without a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flow.

 

On October 23, 2003, several citizens groups sued the Army Corps of Engineers (“COE”) in the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia seeking to invalidate “nationwide” permits utilized by the COE and the coal industry for permitting most in-stream disturbances associated with coal mining, including excess spoil valley fills and refuse impoundments. The plaintiffs sought to enjoin the prospective approval of these nationwide permits and to enjoin some coal operators, including one of our subsidiaries, from additional use of existing nationwide permit approvals until they obtain more detailed “individual” permits. On

 

16



 

July 8, 2004, the court issued an order enjoining the further issuance of nationwide permits and requiring individual permits to be obtained in their place. The order also precludes activity on areas covered by certain existing nationwide permits. The United States Department of Justice appealed the decision to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. The appeal is pending. A similar suit was filed in January 2005 in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky. Although we have no current operations in Kentucky, similar suits may be filed in other jurisdictions where we do, or may in the future, have operations.

 

Because of the decision, one nationwide permit already issued to a subsidiary of ours developing the new Pax Surface Mine in Raleigh County, West Virginia was converted to an individual permit. That conversion application was open to public comment and comments were received. We responded to the comments in a timely manner and the permit was issued in March 2005. Also because of this decision, a then pending nationwide permit application for a second permit at the Pax Surface Mine was converted to an individual permit application. Public comments were received and we responded to those comments in a timely manner as well. That permit was issued in January 2005. Although the new Pax Surface Mine and other mines may experience additional permit requirements and potential delays in permit approvals, based on the information available to us at this time, we believe our existing operations will not be adversely impacted in a material manner.

 

Extensive regulation of the impacts of mining on the environment and related litigation has had and may have a significant effect on our costs of production and competitive position. Further regulations, legislation or litigation may also cause our sales or profitability to decline by hindering our ability to continue our mining operations, by increasing our costs, or by causing coal to become a less attractive fuel source.

 

Legal Proceedings

 

The Company is involved in various claims and other legal actions arising in the ordinary course of business. In the opinion of management, the ultimate disposition of these matters will not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

 

(18) Supplemental Guarantor and Non-Guarantor Financial Information

 

On July 30, 2004, the Company’s indirect wholly owned subsidiary, Foundation PA Coal Company (the “Issuer”), issued $300,000 aggregate principal amount of 71¤4% Senior Notes (the “Notes”) that mature on August 1, 2014. In accordance with the indenture governing the Notes, each of the direct and indirect wholly owned subsidiaries of the Company, other than the Issuer, have fully and unconditionally guaranteed the Notes, jointly and severally, on a senior unsecured basis. Separate financial statements and other disclosures concerning the Guarantor Subsidiaries are not presented because management believes that such information is not material to holders of the Notes. The following condensed financial statement information is provided for the Guarantor/Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries.

 

17



 

Successor

Supplemental Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations

For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2005

(Unaudited, in thousands)

 

 

 

FCC

 

Non-Guarantor
Subsidiary (Issuer)

 

Guarantor
Subsidiaries

 

Eliminations

 

Consolidated

 

Total revenues

 

$

 

$

 

$

305,506

 

$

 

$

305,506

 

Costs and expenses:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cost of sales (excludes depreciation depletion and amortization)

 

 

38

 

215,192

 

 

215,230

 

Selling, general and administrative expenses (excludes depreciation, depletion and amortization)

 

7,367

 

 

4,064

 

 

11,431

 

Accretion on asset retirement obligation

 

 

 

2,040

 

 

2,040

 

Depreciation, depletion and amortization

 

 

 

54,800

 

 

54,800

 

Amortization of coal supply agreements

 

 

 

(23,379

)

 

(23,379

)

Income (loss) from operations

 

(7,367

)

(38

)

52,789

 

 

45,384

 

Other income (expense):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest expense

 

(1,509

)

(6,222

)

(2,764

)

(3,758

)

(14,253

)

Interest income

 

52

 

 

70

 

 

122

 

Income (loss) from operations before income taxes

 

(8,824

)

(6,260

)

50,095

 

(3,758

)

31,253

 

Income tax expense

 

(11,188

)

(1,020

)

(3

)

 

(12,211

)

Income from continuing operations

 

(20,012

)

(7,280

)

50,092

 

(3,758

)

19,042

 

Equity in earnings of investments in issuer and guarantor subsidiaries

 

39,054

 

37,808

 

 

(76,862

)

 

Net income (loss)

 

$

19,042

 

$

30,528

 

$

50,092

 

$

(80,620

)

$

19,042

 

 

18



 

Successor

Supplemental Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets

March 31, 2005

(Unaudited, in thousands)

 

 

 

FCC

 

Non-Guarantor
Subsidiary (Issuer)

 

Guarantor
Subsidiaries

 

Eliminations

 

Consolidated

 

Assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents

 

$

4,479

 

$

 

$

(347

)

$

 

$

4,132

 

Trade accounts receivable

 

(473

)

 

101,741

 

 

101,268

 

Inventories, net

 

 

 

58,311

 

 

58,311

 

Deferred income taxes

 

 

5,569

 

9,576

 

 

15,145

 

Other current assets

 

2,092

 

271

 

22,219

 

 

24,582

 

Total current assets

 

6,098

 

5,840

 

191,500

 

 

203,438

 

Owned surface lands

 

 

 

28,274

 

 

28,274

 

Plant, equipment and mine development, net

 

 

 

509,101

 

 

509,101

 

Leased mineral rights, net

 

 

 

1,245,966

 

 

1,245,966

 

Coal supply agreements, net

 

 

 

76,947

 

 

76,947

 

Other noncurrent assets

 

400,807

 

442,200

 

40,818

 

(843,007

)

40,818

 

Total assets

 

$

406,905

 

$

448,040

 

$

2,092,606

 

$

(843,007

)

$

2,104,544

 

Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Trade accounts payable

 

849

 

 

30,466

 

 

31,315

 

Accrued expenses and other current liabilities

 

10,268

 

4,910

 

144,085

 

 

159,263

 

Total current liabilities

 

11,117

 

4,910

 

174,551

 

 

190,578

 

Long-term debt, excluding current portion

 

 

685,000

 

 

 

685,000

 

Deferred income taxes

 

3,824

 

126,433

 

7,947

 

 

138,204

 

Noncurrent coal supply agreements, net

 

 

 

147,269

 

 

147,269

 

Other noncurrent liabilities

 

116,985

 

(438,098

)

668,514

 

321,113

 

668,514

 

Total liabilities

 

131,926

 

378,245

 

998,281

 

321,113

 

1,829,565

 

Stockholders’ Equity

 

274,979

 

69,795

 

1,094,325

 

(1,164,120

)

274,979

 

Total liabilities and stockholder’s equity

 

$

406,905

 

$

448,040

 

$

2,092,606

 

$

(843,007

)

$

2,104,544

 

 

19



 

Successor

Supplemental Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2005

(Unaudited, in thousands)

 

 

 

FCC

 

Non-Guarantor
Subsidiary (Issuer)

 

Guarantor
Subsidiaries

 

Eliminations

 

Consolidated

 

Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities

 

$

6,769

 

$

 

$

4,495

 

$

 

$

11,264

 

Investing activities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Purchases of property, plant and equipment

 

 

 

(36,528

)

 

(36,528

)

Proceeds from disposition of property, plant and equipment

 

 

 

4,353

 

 

4,353

 

Net cash used in investing activities

 

 

 

(32,175

)

 

(32,175

)

Financing activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Proceeds from revolving credit line

 

 

39,000

 

 

 

39,000

 

Repayment of revolving credit line

 

 

(39,000

)

 

 

(39,000

)

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

 

6,769

 

 

(27,680

)

 

(20,911

)

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period

 

(2,290

)

 

27,333

 

 

25,043

 

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period

 

$

4,479

 

$

 

$

(347

)

$

 

$

4,132

 

 

20



 

ITEM 2.  MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

 

SPECIAL NOTE REGARDING FORWARD–LOOKING STATEMENTS

 

This Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements that are not statements of historical fact and may involve a number of risks and uncertainties. These statements relate to analyses and other information that are based on forecasts of future results and estimates of amounts not yet determinable. These statements may also relate to our future prospects, developments and business strategies.

 

We have used the words “anticipate,” “believe,” “could,” “estimate,” “expect,” “intend,” “may,” “plan,” “predict,” “project” and similar terms and phrases, including references to assumptions, in this Form 10-Q to identify forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are made based on expectations and beliefs concerning future events affecting us and are subject to uncertainties and factors relating to our operations and business environment, all of which are difficult to predict and many of which are beyond our control, that could cause our actual results to differ materially from those matters expressed in or implied by these forward-looking statements. The factors, described below and elsewhere in this Form 10-Q, and in other documents we file with the SEC from time to time, are among those that may cause actual results to differ materially from our forward-looking statements:

 

                  market demand for coal, electricity and steel;

                  future economic or capital market conditions;

                  weather conditions or catastrophic weather-related damage;

                  our production capabilities;

                  the consummation of financing, acquisition or disposition transactions and the effect thereof on our business;

                  our plans and objectives for future operations and expansion or consolidation;

                  our relationships with, and other conditions affecting, our customers;

                  timing of reductions or increases in customer coal inventories;

                  long-term coal supply arrangements;

                  risks in coal mining;

                  environmental laws, including those directly affecting our coal mining and production, and those affecting our customers’ coal usage;

                  competition;

                  railroad, barge, trucking and other transportation performance and costs;

                  our assumptions concerning economically recoverable coal reserve estimates;

                  employee workforce factors;

                  regulatory and court decisions;

                  future legislation and changes in regulations or governmental policies or changes in interpretations thereof;

                  changes in postretirement benefit and pension obligations;

                  our liquidity, results of operations and financial condition.

 

You should keep in mind that any forward-looking statement made by us in this Form 10-Q or elsewhere speaks only as of the date on which we make it. New risks and uncertainties come up from time to time, and it is impossible for us to predict these events or how they may affect us. We have no duty to, and do not intend to, update or revise the forward-looking statements in this Form 10-Q after the date of this Form 10-Q, except as may be required by law. In light of these risks and uncertainties, you should keep in mind that any forward-looking statement made in this Form 10-Q or elsewhere might not occur.

 

Overview

 

We are the fifth largest coal company in the United States operating nine mining complexes that consist of thirteen individual coal mines. Our mining operations are located in southwest Pennsylvania, southern West Virginia, southern Illinois and the southern Powder River Basin region of Wyoming. Three of our mining complexes are surface mines, two of our complexes are underground

 

21



 

mines using highly efficient longwall mining technology and the remaining four complexes are underground mines that utilize continuous miners. In addition to mining coal, we also purchase coal from other producers and utilize it with our own production in coal brokering and trading activities.

 

Our primary product is steam coal, sold primarily to electric power generators located in the United States. Approximately 10% of our coal sales revenue for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 8% of our pro-forma 2004 sales revenue was made from the sale of metallurgical coal to the domestic and export metallurgical coal markets where it is used to make coke for steel production.

 

While the majority of our revenues are derived from the sale of coal, we also realize revenues from coal production royalties, override royalty payments from a coal supply agreement now fulfilled by another producer, fees from the processing of our production by a synfuel facility, fees to transload coal through our Rivereagle facility on the Big Sandy River and revenues from the sale of coalbed methane.

 

From July 1, 1999 through July 29, 2004, we were a stand-alone wholly owned subsidiary of RAG Coal International AG (“RAG”) headquartered in Essen, Germany. In October 2003, RAG announced its intention to divest its international mining subsidiaries. In addition to RAG American Coal Holding, Inc., these international mining subsidiaries consisted of operations in Australia and Venezuela. On February 29, 2004, RAG announced the sale of four of our subsidiaries, collectively known as the RAG Colorado Business Unit, to a third party. The subsidiaries comprising the RAG Colorado Business Unit owned an underground longwall mine located in Routt County, Colorado, an idled underground longwall mine located in Moffat County, Colorado and surface lands located in northwest Colorado and southern Wyoming. The transaction closed on April 15, 2004. In the financial statements of the predecessor for the first quarter of 2004, the RAG Colorado Business Unit was classified as a discontinued operation.

 

On May 24, 2004, RAG, entered into a definitive agreement with Foundation Coal Corporation, which was owned by affiliates of First Reserve, Blackstone and AMCI, to sell all of its operations except the RAG Colorado Business Unit which was sold on April 15, 2004. The transaction closed on July 30, 2004.

 

Results of Continuing Operations

 

Basis of Presentation:

 

RAG American Coal Holding, Inc. and its subsidiaries, excluding the subsidiaries comprising the RAG Colorado Business Unit which were sold on April 15, 2004, were acquired by the Company on July 30, 2004. Due to the change in ownership, and the resultant application of purchase accounting, the historical financial statements of the Predecessor and the Successor included in this Form 10-Q have been prepared on different bases for the periods presented and are not comparable.

 

The following provides a description of the basis of presentation during all periods presented:

 

Successor—represents the consolidated financial position of Foundation Coal Corporation as of December 31, 2004 and March 31, 2005 and our consolidated results of operations and cash flows for the three months ended March 31, 2005. Our consolidated financial position at December 31, 2004 and March 31, 2005 and our consolidated results of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2005 reflect our preliminary estimates of purchase price allocation based on preliminary appraisals prepared by independent valuation specialists and preliminary employee benefit valuations prepared by independent actuaries. Deferred income taxes have been provided in the consolidated balance sheet based on our best estimates of the tax versus book basis of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed, as adjusted to estimated fair values. The amounts that we may record based on the final assessment and determination of fair values may differ significantly from the information presented in the consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2004 and March 31, 2005 and the consolidated statement of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2005. The application of purchase accounting to the acquired assets of RAG American Coal Holding, Inc. resulted in increases to owned and leased mineral rights, surface lands, coal inventories, and the asset arising from recognition of asset retirement obligations. It resulted in decreases to plant and equipment and current deferred taxes. In addition, the historical cost assigned to deferred overburden in the acquired asset balance sheet was eliminated. The values assigned to uncovered and partially covered coal lands considered the stage of the mining process in which these two groups of coal lands were at the acquisition date. The application of purchase accounting to the acquired liabilities of RAG American Coal Holding, Inc. resulted in increases to postretirement health care obligations, pension obligations, black lung obligations, asset retirement obligations and noncurrent deferred taxes. Separate assets or liabilities were established to reflect the valuation of above or below market coal supply agreements in relation to market price curves. With regard to consolidated results of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2005, the principal effects of the application of purchase

 

22



 

accounting, in comparison to reporting for historical periods, were to decrease the cost of coal sold due to lower expenses for postretirement health care and pensions, to decrease the cost of coal sold for net deferrals of deferred overburden costs, to decrease net amortization expense for coal supply agreements which is now a credit because our contracts at acquisition represented a net liability, and to increase the cost of depletion expense for owned and leased mineral rights.

 

Predecessor—represents the results of operations and cash flows for RAG American Coal Holding, Inc. for the three months ended March 31, 2004. These consolidated financial statements are based on the historical assets, liabilities, sales and expenses of the Predecessor for these periods. During the three months ended March 31, 2004, RAG American Coal Holding, Inc. reported a loss from continuing operations before income tax expense of $73.1 million. This result included: (a) $48.8 million in pre-tax charges related to termination of hedge accounting for interest rate swaps since it became probable during the three month period that the underlying variable rate bank debt would be repaid early rather than held to maturity; and (b) $3.1 million in pre-tax mark-to-market losses for the one month portion of the three months that the interest swaps did not qualify for hedge accounting.

 

Pro forma—To facilitate first quarter to first quarter comparisons throughout management’s discussion and analysis, we discuss “pro forma” results for the three months ended March 31, 2004.  The pro forma results present the first quarter of 2004 as if Foundation Coal Corporation: (a) acquired RAG American Coal Holding, Inc. on January 1, 2004; (b) received funds from the Initial Public Offering (“IPO”) of Foundation Coal Holdings, Inc. with which to prepay debt on January 1, 2004; and (c) transacted the sale of the RAG Colorado Business Unit and associated repayment of Predecessor bank debt and settlement of Predecessor interest rate swaps on December 31, 2003.  Pro-forma amounts are not recognized measures under GAAP and do not purport to be alternatives to GAAP operating measures. Management believes that the discussion of pro forma operating results is important to the readers of the financial statements to understand key operating trends in comparing the first quarter of 2005 to the first quarter of 2004.  The following table presents unaudited results of operations for the Successor for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and unaudited results of operations for the Predecessor on a pro forma basis as described above for the three months ended March 31, 2004.

 

Three months ended March 31, 2005—Successor compared to three months ended March 31, 2004—Predecessor

 

As previously described there are significant differences in the basis of financial reporting between the Successor and Predecessor periods as a result of the purchase of RAG American Coal Holding, Inc. by Foundation Coal Corporation on July 30, 2004, and the resultant application of purchase accounting to the assets and liabilities acquired.  The Successor reported income from continuing operations of $19.0 million for the three months ended March 31, 2005 whereas the Predecessor reported a loss from continuing operations of $46.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2004.

 

During the prior year first quarter the Predecessor incurred approximately $32.8 million, net of income taxes, of non-cash charges related to termination of hedge accounting for interest rate swaps and mark-to-market losses on the interest rate swaps.  These charges in combination with below normal coal production from our Northern Appalachia mines, were primarily responsible for the Predecessor’s loss in the first quarter of 2004.

 

During the first quarter of 2005, the Successor achieved stronger production and tons sold, enjoyed significantly higher per ton sales realizations and received the benefit of a net credit from amortization of coal supply agreements, reflecting amortization of a liability established for below market contracts in purchase accounting.  Year-to-year increases in cost of coal sales and administrative expenses were more than absorbed by higher coal sales revenues.  The operating trends discussed in the following section, Historical three months ended March 31, 2005 compared to pro forma three months ended March 31, 2004, also apply to comparisons of the Successor and Predecessor periods for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively.

 

23



 

Historical and Pro Forma

Consolidated Condensed Statements of Operations

(Dollars in millions)

(Unaudited)

 

 

 

Successor
Three Months
Ended March
31, 2005

 

Predecessor
Three Months
Ended March
31, 2004

 

Pro Forma
Adjustments

 

Pro Forma
Three Months Ended March 31, 2004

 

Revenues

 

$

305.5

 

$

226.3

 

$

(0.5

)(a)

$

225.8

 

Cost of coal sales

 

215.2

 

197.2

 

(9.2

)(b)

188.0

 

Selling, general & administrative expense

 

11.4

 

10.4

 

(1.3

)(c)

9.1

 

Asset retirement obligation accretion

 

2.0

 

1.7

 

0.3

 (d)

2.0

 

Depreciation, depletion & amortization

 

54.8

 

25.0

 

26.2

 (e)

51.2

 

Amortization of coal supply agreements

 

(23.3

)

4.0

 

(35.6

)(f)

(31.6

)

Income (loss) from operations

 

45.4

 

(12.0

)

19.1

 

7.1

 

Interest expense

 

(14.3

)

(9.9

)

(5.6

)(g)

(15.5

)

Interest income

 

0.1

 

0.8

 

 

0.8

 

Loss on termination of hedge accounting for interest rate swaps

 

 

(48.8

)

48.8

 (h)

 

Mark-to-market loss on interest rate swaps

 

 

(3.2

)

3.2

 (h)

 

Income (loss) before income taxes

 

31.2

 

(73.1

)

65.5

 

(7.6

)

Income tax (expense) benefit

 

(12.2

)

27.0

 

(23.3

)(i)

3.7

 

Income (loss) from continuing operations

 

19.0

 

(46.1

)

42.2

 

(3.9

)

Income from discontinued operations, net of income tax expense

 

 

2.8

 

(2.8

)(h)

 

Net income (loss)

 

$

19.0

 

$

(43.3

)

$

(39.4

)

$

(3.9

)

 


(a) Reflects the elimination of royalty income as a result of purchase accounting

(b) Reflects an adjustment of $9.2 million of overburden removal costs reflected on depreciation, depletion and amortization as a result of purchase accounting, $3.7 million of elimination of actuarial losses on pension and other postretirement benefits as a result of purchase accounting and $3.8 million of additional costs due to coal inventories written up to fair value in purchase accounting.

(c) Reflects an adjustment of $1.1 million for expense arising from a management incentive plan eliminated when RAG American Coal holding, Inc. was acquired by Foundation Coal Corporation and $0.2 million of elimination of actuarial losses on pensions, other postretirement benefits and black lung benefits as a result of purchase accounting.

(d) Reflects accretion expense on the additional asset retirement obligation recognized in purchase accounting.

(e) Reflects increased depreciation, depletion and amortization, primarily cost depletion on mineral rights, as a result of purchase accounting.

(f) Reflects net credit to amortization of coal supply agreements as a result of purchase accounting.

(g) Reflects adjustment to interest expense based on capital structure put in place by the acquisition.

(h) Reflects adjustments to eliminate debt extinguishment charges and income from discontinued operations arising from sale of the Colorado Business Unit.

(i) Represents the tax effect of the pro forma adjustments computed such that the pro forma income tax benefit is recognized at the effective income tax rate recorded in the Successor period of 2004.

 

24



 

Historical three months ended March 31, 2005 compared to pro forma three months ended March 31, 2004

 

Coal sales realization per ton sold represents the average revenue realized on each ton of coal sold. It is calculated by dividing coal sales revenues by tons sold.

 

Revenues

 

 

 

Historical

 

Pro Forma

 

Increase (Decrease)

 

 

 

Three Months
Ended
March 31, 2005

 

Three Months
Ended
March 31, 2004

 

 

 

 

$

 

%

 

 

(Unaudited, in millions, except per ton data)

 

Coal sales

 

$

300.0

 

$

222.0

 

$

78.0

 

35.1

%

Other revenues

 

5.5

 

3.8

 

1.7

 

44.7

%

Total revenues

 

$

305.5

 

$

225.8

 

$

79.7

 

35.3

%

Tons sold

 

17.3

 

15.4

 

1.9

 

12.3

%

Coal sales realization per ton sold

 

$

17.38

 

$

14.45

 

$

2.93

 

20.3

%

 

Coal sales revenues for the three months ended March 31, 2005 increased by 35.1% compared to the pro forma coal sales revenues for the three months ended March 31, 2004 as a result of a 12.3% increase in tons sold and a 20.3% increase in average coal sales realization per ton.

 

Coal sales volumes in Northern Appalachia increased by 1.4 million tons (70%) primarily as a result of uninterrupted operations during the first quarter of 2005.  Coal sale volumes in Northern Appalachia in the first quarter of 2004 were decreased by interruptions to operations caused by the idling of the Cumberland Mine longwall for approximately one-half of the quarter and an extended duration longwall move at the Emerald Mine.  From February 17 through May 7, 2004, the longwall mining equipment at the Cumberland Mine was idled due to alleged violations resulting from a revised interpretation of regulations issued by MSHA regarding the ventilation system at the mine.  In response, we revised the ventilation system to minimize any future business disruption and on May 7, 2004 we resumed longwall operations at the Cumberland Mine.  There was no interruption of production due to ventilation issues during the first quarter of 2005.  Coal sales volumes in the Powder River Basin increased by 0.6 million tons (5.7%) primarily as a result of higher levels of committed sales.

 

Coal sales realization per ton sold in Northern and Central Appalachia each increased by 25% in 2005 due to substitution of higher priced contracts which took effect in late 2004 and early 2005 for lower priced contracts that rolled off.  An additional factor in Northern Appalachia were higher coal quality premiums for sulfur content as a result of record prices for sulfur dioxide allowances and lower sulfur content of shipped coal.  In the Powder River Basin, coal sales realizations per ton declined by 2% due to expiration at the end of 2004 of higher priced contracts signed during the 2001 market uptick, partly offset by higher sulfur premiums.  The weighted average coal sales realization per ton sold of $17.38 for the first quarter of 2005 also benefited from a larger proportion of higher priced Northern Appalachia tons sold relative to the lower priced tons from the Powder River Basin.

 

Approximately 98% of our 2005 projected production is committed and priced. At March 31, 2005, uncommitted and unpriced tonnage was 11% and 30% of planned production in 2006 and 2007, respectively. Higher value eastern coals account for the majority of uncommitted tonnage as 23% and 43% of the Company’s planned eastern production remains uncommitted and unpriced in 2006 and 2007, respectively, including 56% and 74%, respectively, of the Company’s planned metallurgical coal production in those years.

 

Other revenues for the three months ended March 31, 2005 increased by $1.7 million compared to the pro forma other revenues for the three months ended March 31, 2004.  The increase was primarily due to higher coalbed methane revenues of $1.2 million and higher synfuel fees of $0.4 million.

 

25



 

Costs and Expenses

 

 

 

Historical

 

Pro Forma

 

Increase (Decrease)

 

 

 

Three Months
Ended March
31, 2005

 

Three Months
Ended March
31, 2004

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

 

%

 

 

(Unaudited, in millions)

 

Cost of coal sales (excludes depreciation, depletion and amortization)

 

$

215.2

 

$

188.0

 

$

27.2

 

14.5

%

Selling, general and administrative expenses (excludes depreciation, depletion and amortization)

 

11.4

 

9.1

 

2.3

 

25.3

%

Accretion on asset retirement obligations

 

2.0

 

2.0

 

 

 

Depreciation, depletion and amortization

 

54.8

 

51.2

 

3.6

 

7.0

%

Amortization of coal supply agreements

 

(23.3

)

(31.6

)

8.3

 

26.3

%

Total costs and expenses

 

$

260.1

 

$

218.7

 

$

41.6

 

19.0

%

 

Cost of coal sales.  The cost of coal sales for the three months ended March 31, 2005 increased from the pro forma cost of coal sales for the three months ended March 31, 2004 due to: (a) increases in labor costs as a result of both compensation increases and hiring of additional personnel; (b) increases in most categories of materials and services as a result of significantly higher commodity prices particularly for steel products and diesel fuel; (c) increases in royalties and coal production taxes as a result of higher revenues; and (d) increased operating levels particularly at the Cumberland Mine.   Cost of coal sales per ton were $12.47 for the three months ended March 31, 2005 compared to a pro forma figure of $12.24 for the three months ended March 31, 2004, an increase of 1.9%.

 

Selling, general and administrative expenses.  Selling, general and administrative expenses for the three months ended March 31, 2005 totaled $11.4 million compared to pro forma expense of $9.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2004.  The increase is primarily due to additional expenses incurred for audit fees and compensation expenses, including bonus accruals based on the strong level of performance in the first quarter.

 

Accretion on asset retirement obligation.  Accretion on asset retirement obligation is a component of accounting for asset retirement obligations under SFAS No. 143. Accretion represents the increase in the asset retirement liability to reflect the change in the liability for the passage of time.  Accretion expense was comparable between the two periods.

 

Depreciation, depletion and amortization.  Depreciation, depletion and amortization includes depreciation of plant and equipment, cost depletion of amounts assigned to coal lands and mining rights and amortization of mine development costs and leasehold improvements.  Expense increased in the three months ended March 31, 2005 compared to the pro forma expense for the three months ended March 31, 2004 as a result of higher cost depletion due to increased volumes of coal mined and higher depreciation due to equipment additions over the past year.

 

Coal supply agreement amortization.  Application of purchase accounting resulted in recognition of a significant liability for below market priced coal supply agreements as well as a significant asset for above market priced coal supply agreements, both in relation to market prices at the acquisition date. Amortization of the liability for below market priced coal supply agreements during the three months ended March 31, 2005 totals $30.9 million of credit to expense. Amortization of the asset for above market priced coal supply agreements during the same period totals $7.6 million of charges to expense. The decrease in the net credit for amortization of coal supply agreements compared to the pro forma amount for the three months ended March 31, 2004 is primarily due to reduced amortization of below market priced coal supply agreements due to roll-off of lower priced contracts in Northern and Central Appalachia.

 

Segment Analysis

 

Powder River Basin—Income from operations for the three months ended March 31, 2005 was $5.6 million. The pro forma loss from operations for the three months ended March 31, 2004 was $0.7 million.  The increase in operating income is due to higher tons sold of 0.6 million, lower pro forma net expense for amortization of coal supply agreements as a result of the expiration of several above market contracts at year end 2004, and higher coal quality premiums, partly offset by lower sales realizations per ton also reflecting the expiration of above market contracts.  Cost of coal sales per ton sold increased 0.4% year over year.

 

26



 

Northern Appalachia—Income from operations for the three months ended March 31, 2005 was $42.5 million compared with pro forma income from operations of $4.8 million for the three months ended March 31, 2004.  The significant improvement is primarily due to increased coal sales revenues of $58.9 million resulting from a 70% increase in tons sold and a 25% increase in average sales realization per ton.  Both Cumberland and Emerald mines had uninterrupted operations in the first quarter of 2005.  During the first quarter of 2004, Cumberland’s longwall was idle for approximately one-half of the quarter, for reasons previously described, and Emerald had an extended duration longwall move during the prior year period.  These interruptions had the effect of lowering coal sales volumes in 2004.  Higher sales revenues were partly offset by increases in labor costs, active and retiree medical benefits, materials and supplies, coal production taxes, cost depletion, depreciation and a reduced credit for amortization of coal supply agreements.   Cost of coal sales per ton decreased 25% year over year.

 

Central Appalachia—Income from operations for the three months ended March 31, 2005 was $13.0 million compared with pro forma operating income of $11.7 million for the three months ended March 31, 2004.  Coal sales revenues increased $17.5 million primarily due to a 25% increase in average sales realizations per ton; tons sold were approximately equal to the prior year.   Higher sales revenues were partly offset by increased expenses for: (a) labor and fringe benefits; (b) materials and supplies, led by increases for roof control materials and diesel fuel; (c) royalties and severance taxes driven by higher sales revenues; (d) cost depletion; and (e) amortization of coal supply agreements, representing a smaller net credit due to roll-off of lower priced sales contracts valued in the purchase accounting.  Also, the pro forma operating income for the three months ended March 31, 2004 included a $1.5 million charge for settlement of litigation.  Cost of coal sales per ton increased 12.6% year over year.

 

Interest Expense, Net

 

 

 

Historical

 

Pro Forma

 

Increase (Decrease)

 

 

 

Three Months
Ended
March 31, 2005

 

Three Months
Ended
March 31, 2004

 

 

 

 

$

 

%

 

 

(Unaudited, in millions)

 

Interest expense—debt related

 

$

(11.1

)

$

(10.3

)

$

0.8

 

7.8

%

Interest expense—amortization of deferred financing fees

 

(0.8

)

(2.6

)

(1.8

)

(69.2

)%

Interest expense—surety bond and letter of credit fees

 

(2.4

)

(2.6

)

(0.2

)

(7.6

)%

Interest income

 

0.1

 

0.8

 

0.7

 

88.0

%

Interest expense, net

 

$

(14.2

)

$

(14.7

)

$

(0.5

)

(3.4

)%

 

Debt related interest expense for the three months ended March 31, 2005 was higher than the pro forma debt related interest expense for three months ended March 31, 2004 due to: (a) about a 100 basis point increase in the interest rate on variable rate debt; (b) a full quarter of fixed interest rates on $85 million of the variable rate debt via interest rate swaps and (c) greater utilization of the revolving credit agreement.  These factors were partly offset by the impact of repaying approximately $39 million of variable rate debt from cash on hand at December 31, 2004.  The remaining portion of the $85 million prepayment made on December 31, 2004 was funded by proceeds from the IPO and has been considered in calculating the pro forma interest expense for the three months ended March 31, 2004.  Pro forma amortization of deferred financing fees for the three months ended March 31, 2004 includes $1.7 million of accelerated amortization from the repayment of variable rate debt with IPO proceeds; there is no accelerated amortization in the three months ended March 31, 2005.  The decrease in surety bond and letter of credit fees in the first quarter of 2005 is due to reductions in the amounts of these financial assurance instruments compared to the period immediately following the purchase of RAG American Coal Holding, Inc.  The reduction in interest income between quarters is primarily due to lower cash balances available for investment in the three months ended March 31, 2005.

 

27



 

Income Tax Expense (Benefit)

 

 

 

Historical

 

Pro Forma

 

Increase (Decrease)

 

 

 

Three Months
Ended March 31,
2005

 

Three Months
Ended March 31,
2004

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

 

%

 

 

(Unaudited, in millions)

 

Income tax (expense) benefit

 

$

(12.2

)

$

3.7

 

$

15.9

 

429.7

%

 

For the three months ended March 31, 2005, income taxes are provided at an effective rate of 39.4% based on projected full year taxable income and projected full year temporary differences.   Current tax expense, which represents taxes currently payable on operations, was approximately 26.7% of pre-tax income.  We are providing a full valuation allowance against deferred tax assets attributable to AMT tax credits.  For the three months ended March 31, 2004, a pro forma income tax benefit was recognized at an effective rate of 48.3%, the same effective rate used to provide taxes on the Successor’s pre-tax income for the five months ended December 31, 2004.

 

Liquidity and Capital Resources

 

Our primary sources of cash have been sales of our coal production and purchased coal to customers, plus cash from sales of non-core assets and miscellaneous revenues.

 

Our primary uses of cash have been our cash costs of coal production, the cash cost of purchased coal, capital expenditures, interest costs, cash payments for employee benefit obligations such as defined benefit pensions and retiree health care benefits, cash outlays related to post mining asset retirement obligations and support of working capital requirements such as coal inventories and trade accounts receivable. Our ability to service our debt (principal and interest) and acquire new productive assets for use in our operations has been and will be dependent upon our ability to generate cash from our operations. We normally fund all of our capital expenditure requirements with cash generated from operations. Historically, we have engaged in minimal financing of assets such as through operating leases.

 

In the Predecessor periods, cash balances in excess of our day-to-day operating requirements were placed on deposit with RAG where cash balances could be aggregated to earn better investment returns. This cash on deposit was available to us on a one day turn-around. Increases in the cash on deposit with RAG have been classified under financing activities as uses of cash in the consolidated cash flow statements. Decreases in cash on deposit with RAG have been classified under financing activities as cash provided.

 

The following is a summary of cash provided by or used in each of the indicated categories of activities during three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively.

 

 

 

Successor

 

Predecessor

 

 

 

 

 

Three Months Ended
March 31, 2005

 

Three Months Ended
March 31, 2004

 

Increase
(Decrease)

 

 

 

(Unaudited, in millions)

 

Cash provided by (used in):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Operating activities—continuing operations

 

$

11.3

 

$

2.4

 

$

8.9

 

Operating activities—discontinued operations

 

 

9.6

 

(9.6

)

Investing activities—continuing operations

 

(32.2

)

(23.8

)

(8.4

)

Investing activities—discontinued operations

 

 

(0.1

)

0.1

 

Financing activities—borrowings(2)

 

39.0

 

 

39.0

 

Financing activities—repayments (2)

 

(39.0

)

(0.8

)

(38.2

)

Financing activities—on deposit with RAG(1)

 

 

5.3

 

(5.3

)

Change in cash and cash equivalents

 

$

(20.9

)

$

(7.4

)

$

(13.5

)

 


(1)          Represents the decrease in the balance of cash on deposit with RAG.

 

(2)          The borrowings and repayments during the three months ended March 31, 2005 represent use of the Revolving Credit facility to maintain day-to-day liquidity.

 

28



 

Cash provided by operating activities from continuing operations increased in the three months ended March 31, 2005 as compared to the Predecessor results for the three months ended March 31, 2004 primarily due to higher net income from continuing operations partly offset by increases in working capital, mainly trade accounts receivable and inventories.

 

Cash used in investing activities for continuing operations increased in the three months ended March 31, 2005 as compared to the Predecessor results for the three months ended March 31, 2004 mainly due to higher capital expenditures.  Capital expenditures for the three months ended March 31, 2005 totaled $36.5 million, including $17.7 million of expenditures related to the expansion of the Belle Ayr Mine in the Powder River Basin, development of the Pax surface Mine in Central Appalachia, addition of a continuous mining unit to the Kingston Mine in Central Appalachia, and the widening of the Emerald Mine longwall face to 1,450 feet from 1,250 feet.  Capital expenditures for the three months ended March 31, 2004 of $25.5 million were mainly for replacement of equipment and other expenditures necessary to sustain mine operations.

 

Our primary source of liquidity will continue to be cash from sales of our coal production and purchased coal to customers. We have availability under our revolving credit facility, subject to certain conditions.

 

As of March 31, 2005, we have outstanding $685.0 million in aggregate indebtedness, with an additional $149.1 million of available borrowings under our revolving credit facility (after giving effect to $200.9 million of letters of credit outstanding as of March 31, 2005). Our liquidity requirements will be significant, primarily due to debt service requirements. Of the $14.3 million of interest expense for the three months ended March 31, 2005, approximately $13.1 million has or will be paid in cash.

 

Based on our current levels of operations, we believe that remaining cash on hand, cash flow from operations and available borrowings under the revolving credit portion of our Senior Credit Facilities will enable us to meet our working capital, capital expenditure, debt service and other funding requirements for at least the next twelve months.

 

As a regular part of our business, we review opportunities for, and engage in discussions and negotiations concerning, the acquisition of coal mining assets, including LBA bids, and acquisitions of, or combinations with, coal mining companies. When we believe that these opportunities are consistent with our growth plans and our acquisition criteria, we will make bids or proposals and/or enter into letters of intent and other similar agreements, which may be binding or nonbinding, that are customarily subject to a variety of conditions and usually permit us to terminate the discussions and any related agreements if, among other things, we are not satisfied with the results of our due diligence investigation. Any acquisition opportunities we pursue could materially affect our liquidity and capital resources and may require us to incur indebtedness, seek equity capital or both.

 

Covenant Compliance

 

We believe that our Senior Credit Facilities and the indenture governing our outstanding 7 1¤4% Senior Notes are material agreements, that the covenants are material terms of these agreements and that information about the covenants is material to an investor’s understanding of our financial condition and liquidity. The breach of covenants in the Senior Credit Facilities that are tied to ratios based on Adjusted EBITDA, as defined below, could result in a default under the Senior Credit Facilities and the lenders could elect to declare all amounts borrowed due and payable. Any such acceleration would also result in a default under our indenture. Additionally, under the Senior Credit Facilities and indenture, our ability to engage in activities such as incurring additional indebtedness, making investments and paying dividends is also tied to ratios based on Adjusted EBITDA.

 

29



 

Covenant levels and adjusted EBITDA ratios for the four quarters ended March 31, 2005 are as follows:

 

 

 

Covenant
Level

 

Adjusted EBITDA
March 31,
2005 Ratios

 

Senior Credit Facilities(1)

 

 

 

 

 

Minimum Adjusted EBITDA to cash interest ratio

 

1.75

x

3.6

x

Maximum total debt to Adjusted EBITDA ratio

 

6.0

x

3.8

x

Indenture(2)

 

 

 

 

 

Minimum Adjusted EBITDA to fixed charge ratio required to incur additional debt pursuant to ratio provisions

 

2.0

x

3.6

x

 


(1)                                  The Senior Credit Facilities require us to maintain an Adjusted EBITDA to cash interest ratio starting at a minimum of 1.75x and a total debt to Adjusted EBITDA ratio starting at a maximum of 6.0x in each case for the most recent four quarter period. Failure to satisfy these ratio requirements would constitute a default under the Senior Credit Facilities. If lenders under the Senior Credit Facilities failed to waive any such default, repayment obligations under the Senior Credit Facilities could be accelerated, which would also constitute a default under the indenture.

 

(2)                                  Our ability to incur additional debt and make certain restricted payments under our indenture, subject to specified exceptions, is tied to an Adjusted EBITDA to fixed charge ratio of at least 2.0 to 1.

 

Adjusted EBITDA is defined as EBITDA further adjusted to exclude non-recurring items, non-cash items and other adjustments permitted in calculating covenant compliance under the indenture, and the Senior Credit Facilities, as shown in the table below. We believe that the inclusion of supplementary adjustments to EBITDA applied in presenting Adjusted EBITDA is appropriate to provide additional information to investors to demonstrate compliance with financing covenants.

 

 

 

 

 

Deduct:

 

Add:

 

 

 

Four
Quarters
Ended
December 31,
2004

 

Three
Months
Ended March
31, 2004

 

Three
Months
Ended March
31, 2005

 

Four
Quarters
Ended
March 31,
2005

 

 

(Unaudited, in millions)

 

EBITDA(1)

 

$

15.6

 

$

(34.9

)

$

76.8

 

$

127.3

 

Non-cash charges (income)(2)

 

70.4

 

57.6

 

(5.3

)

7.5

 

Unusual or non-recurring items(3)

 

35.9

 

2.2

 

 

33.7

 

Cumberland Mine force majeure(4)

 

31.1

 

20.2

 

 

10.9

 

Other adjustments(5)

 

(0.5

)

(0.6

)

0.2

 

0.3

 

Adjusted EBITDA

 

$

152.5

 

$

44.5

 

$

71.7

 

$

179.7

 

 


(1)           EBITDA is calculated in the table below:

 

30



 

 

 

 

 

Deduct:

 

Add:

 

 

 

 

 

Four
Quarters
Ended
December
31,
2004

 

Three
Months
Ended
March 31,
2004

 

Three
Months
Ended
March 31,
2005

 

Four
Quarters
Ended
March 31,
2005

 

 

 

(Unaudited, in millions)

 

Income (loss) from continuing operations

 

$

(76.1

)

$

(46.1

)

$

19.0

 

$

(11.0

)

Interest expense

 

44.7

 

10.0

 

14.3

 

49.0

 

Interest income

 

(2.3

)

(0.8

)

(0.1

)

(1.6

)

Income tax expense (benefit)

 

(38.2

)

(27.0

)

12.2

 

1.0

 

Depreciation, depletion and amortization

 

146.0

 

25.0

 

54.8

 

175.8

 

Amortization of above market coal supply agreements

 

(58.5

)

4.0

 

(23.4

)

(85.9

)

EBITDA

 

$

15.6

 

$

(34.9

)

$

76.8

 

$

127.3

 

 


(2)           We are required to adjust EBITDA, as defined above, for the following non-cash charges (income):

 

 

 

 

 

Deduct:

 

Add:

 

 

 

 

 

Four
Quarters
Ended
December
31,
2004

 

Three
Months
Ended
March 31,
2004

 

Three
Months
Ended
March 31,
2005

 

Four
Quarters
Ended
March 31,
2005

 

 

 

(Unaudited, in millions)

 

Interest rate swaps(a)

 

$

42.6

 

$

52.0

 

$

 

$

(9.4

)

Early extinguishment of debt

 

21.7

 

 

 

21.7

 

Profit in inventory(b)

 

3.8

 

 

 

3.8

 

Overburden removal included in depreciation, depletion and amortization(c)

 

(15.3

)

 

(7.6

)

(22.9

)

Accretion on asset retirement obligations/reclamation expense

 

7.3

 

1.7

 

2.0

 

7.6

 

Stock based compensation expense (d)

 

 

 

0.3

 

0.3

 

Asset impairment charges

 

 

 

 

 

Amortization included in benefits expense(e)

 

10.3

 

3.9

 

 

6.4

 

Total

 

$

70.4

 

$

57.6

 

$

(5.3

)

$

7.5

 

 


(a)          Includes $48.9 million of expense resulting in the four quarters ended December 31, 2004 from loss on termination of hedge accounting for interest rate swaps less $6.3 million mark-to-market adjustment.

 

(b)         Represents incremental cost of sales recorded in the period arising from the preliminary estimate of manufacturing profit added to inventory in purchase accounting.

 

(c)          In purchase accounting, the fair value of partially and fully uncovered coal included consideration of the effort spent prior to the purchase date to remove overburden and get the coal to its partially or fully uncovered state. Therefore, the fair value assigned to partially or fully uncovered coal reserves was higher than that assigned to other coal reserves. Depletion of coal reserves, including the incremental fair value related to pre-acquisition overburden removal efforts, is included in depreciation, depletion and amortization. Subsequent to the acquisition date, the costs associated with removal of overburden to uncover coal reserves is inventoried as work-in-process until the related coal is mined and the inventoried cost charged to cost of coal sales when the coal is sold. Until coal valued as partially or fully uncovered at the acquisition date is fully depleted, depreciation, depletion and amortization will include the value of overburden removal performed prior to the acquisition date which if incurred subsequent to the acquisition date would have been included in cost of coal sales.

 

31



 

(d)         Represents an accrual for compensation expense attributable to restricted stock performance units and restricted stock awarded to certain directors.

 

(e)          Represents the portion of pension, other postretirement and black lung expense resulting from the amortization of unrecognized actuarial losses, prior service costs and transition obligations. Unrecognized actuarial losses, prior service costs and transition obligations were eliminated when the pension, other postretirement and black lung obligations were fair valued in purchase accounting.

 

(3)                                                          We are also required by the credit agreement to adjust EBITDA, as defined above, for the following unusual (income) expense:

 

 

 

 

 

Deduct:

 

Add:

 

 

 

 

 

Four
Quarters
Ended
December 31,
2004

 

Three
Months
Ended
March
31, 2004

 

Three
Months
Ended
March
31, 2005

 

Four
Quarters
Ended
March
31,
2005

 

 

 

(Unaudited, in millions)

 

Litigation/arbitration/contract settlements, net(a)

 

$

28.9

 

$

1.5

 

$

 

$

27.4

 

Transaction bonus(b)

 

1.8

 

 

 

1.8

 

Long-term incentive plan expense(c)

 

2.4

 

1.1

 

 

1.3

 

Gain on asset sales

 

(1.0

)

(0.4

)

 

(0.6

)

Other(d)

 

3.8

 

 

 

3.8

 

Total

 

$

35.9

 

$

2.2

 

$

 

$

33.7

 

 


(a)          Represents arbitration awards, litigation and contract settlements, net of related legal and tax fees.

 

(b)         Represents the cost of a one-time bonus awarded to certain employees in connection with the sale of RAG American Coal Holding, Inc.

 

(c)          Represents the cost of a long-term incentive plan instituted by RAG American Coal Holding, Inc. in 2001 that was terminated prior to closing as required by the change in control provisions in the plan agreement. We have implemented a management equity program that will not result in a cash cost to us.

 

(d)         Represents $2.0 million from a sponsor monitoring fee and $1.8 million from a tax allowance related to the IPO in the four quarters ended December 31, 2004.

 

(4)                                  Represents the adjustment required for the estimated impact of the temporary idling of our Cumberland Mine in the first half of 2004 as a result of a revised interpretation of mine ventilation laws by MSHA. See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” for additional information.

 

(5)                                  We are also required to make adjustments to EBITDA for items such as incremental insurance costs and franchise taxes not included in income tax expense.

 

32



 

Pro-forma cash interest for the four quarters ended March 31, 2005 is calculated as follows (unaudited, in millions):

 

Cash interest amounts stipulated in Credit Agreement for period April 1 through July 29, 2004

 

$

16.0

 

Interest expense for five month operating period ended December 31, 2004

 

26.7

 

Less: Amortization of deferred financing costs for the five month operating period

 

(4.4

)

Less: Cash interest income for the five month operating period

 

(0.5

)

Less: Pro-forma cash interest for five month operating period associated with $85 million senior secured term loan repayment

 

(1.4

)

Interest expense for the three month period ended March 31, 2005

 

14.3

 

Less: Amortization of deferred financing costs for three month period ended March 31, 2005

 

(0.8

)

Less: Cash interest income for the three month period ended March 31, 2005

 

(0.2

)

Less: Other non cash interest expense for three months ended March 31, 2005

 

(0.4

)

 

 

$

49.3

 

 

In future periods, adjustments to EBITDA that could be used to calculate compliance with the debt covenants are: (a) accretion on asset retirement obligations, (b) credits from deferral of overburden removal costs, (c) any non-cash expenses or charges arising as a result of the application of purchase accounting in acquisitions, (d) business optimization expenses or other restructuring charges, (e) non-cash impairment charges resulting from the application of SFAS No. 142 or SFAS No. 144, (f) amortization of intangibles pursuant to SFAS No. 141, and (g) any long term incentive plan accruals or any non-cash compensation expense realized from grants of stock appreciation or similar rights, stock options or other rights to officers, directors and employees.

 

In future periods, cash interest is expected to be calculated by adding back amortization of deferred debt issuance costs and deducting cash interest income from the interest expense reported in the Statement of Operations.

 

Contractual Obligations

 

The following is a summary of our significant future contractual obligations by year as of December 31, 2004.  There have been no significant changes to our contractual obligations during the three months ended March 31, 2005.

 

 

 

2005

 

2006-2007

 

2008-2009

 

After 2009

 

Total

 

 

 

(Unaudited, in millions)

 

Long-term debt and capital leases

 

$

 

$

 

$

 

$

685.0

 

$

685.0

 

Cash interest on long term debt

 

41.3

 

81.4

 

73.6

 

123.7

 

320.0

 

Cash payments for asset retirement obligations

 

3.7

 

5.6

 

3.5

 

197.0

 

209.8

 

Unconditional purchase commitments

 

56.0

 

7.4

 

17.2

 

 

80.6

 

Operating leases

 

5.8

 

9.8

 

3.5

 

1.1

 

20.2

 

Minimum royalties

 

4.0

 

1.0

 

 

 

5.0

 

Total

 

$

110.8

 

$

105.2

 

$

97.8

 

$

1,006.8

 

$

1,320.6

 

 

We expect to invest in the range of $150.0 to $160.0 million in capital expenditures during calendar year 2005 of which approximately $100.0 million is to maintain production and replace mining equipment. The additional $50.0 to $60.0 million is expected to be directed toward selective expansions of production and improvements in productivity. Approximately $34 million of expected 2005 capital expenditures are included in unconditional purchase commitments shown above. The remaining 2005 unconditional purchase commitments and $3 million of the 2006-2007 unconditional purchase commitments relate to forward contracts to purchase diesel fuel and explosives in normal quantities for use at our surface mines. The remaining unconditional purchase commitments, totaling $4.4 million in 2006-2007 and $17.2 million in 2008-2009, relate to a contractual commitment to purchase underground mining equipment. We expect to contribute approximately $6.0 million to our defined benefit retirement plans and to pay approximately $23.0 million of retiree health care benefits in calendar year 2005. We also expect to incur approximately $9.0 million per year for surety bond premiums and letters of credit fees. We believe that cash balances plus cash generated by operations will be sufficient to meet these obligations plus fund requirements for working capital and capital expenditures without incurring additional borrowings.

 

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

 

In the normal course of business, we are a party to certain off-balance sheet arrangements. These arrangements include guarantees, indemnifications and financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk, such as bank letters of credit and performance

 

33



 

or surety bonds. Liabilities related to these arrangements are not reflected in our consolidated balance sheets. However, the underlying obligations that they secure, such as asset retirement obligations, self-insured workers’ compensation liabilities, royalty obligations and certain retiree medical obligations, are reflected in our consolidated balance sheets.

 

We are required to provide financial assurance in order to perform the post-mining reclamation required by our mining permits, pay our federal production royalties, pay workers’ compensation claims under self-insured workers’ compensation laws in the various states, pay federal black lung benefits, pay retiree health care benefits to certain retired UMWA employees and perform certain other obligations.

 

In order to provide the required financial assurance, we generally use surety bonds for post-mining reclamation and royalty payment obligations and bank letters of credit for self-insured workers’ compensation obligations and UMWA retiree health care obligations. Federal black lung benefits are paid from a dedicated trust fund that has sufficient assets to fund these obligations for the next several years. Bank letters of credit are also used to collateralize a portion of the surety bonds.

 

We had outstanding surety bonds with a total face amount of $252.8 million as of March 31, 2005, of which $230.2 million secured reclamation obligations, $10.7 million secured coal lease obligations and $9.6 million secured self-insured workers’ compensation obligations. In addition, we had $200.9 million of letters of credit in place for the following purposes: $36.5 million for workers’ compensation, including collateral for workers’ compensation bonds; $24.1 million for UMWA retiree health care obligations; $130.5 million for collateral for reclamation surety bonds, $5.0 million for minimum royalty payment obligations for a closed mine in Utah; and $4.8 million for other miscellaneous obligations. Recently, surety bond costs have increased, while the market terms under which surety bonds can be obtained have generally become less favorable to all mining companies. In the event that additional surety bonds become unavailable, we would seek to secure our obligations with letters of credit, cash deposits or other suitable forms of collateral.

 

Certain Trends and Uncertainties

 

Our revenues depend on the price at which we are able to sell our coal. The current pricing environment for United States coal is strong. Any decrease in coal prices due to, among other reasons, the supply of domestic and foreign coal, the demand for electricity and the price and availability of alternative fuels for electricity generation could adversely affect our revenues and our ability to generate cash flows. In addition, our results of operations depend on the cost of coal production. We are experiencing increased operating costs for fuel and explosives, steel products, health care, wages, salaries, contract labor, and increased interest expenses for surety bonds and letters of credit. In addition, historically low interest rates have had a negative impact on expenses related to our actuarially determined employee-related liabilities.

 

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

 

In December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued SFAS No. 123 (revised 2004), Share-Based Payment (“SFAS No. 123R”), which replaces SFAS No. 123, and supersedes APB No. 25. SFAS No. 123R requires all share-based payments to employees, including grants of employee stock options, to be recognized in the financial statements based on their fair value at the grant date. SFAS No. 123R generally requires companies to measure the cost of employee services received in exchange for an award of equity instruments (such as stock options and restricted stock) based on the grant-date fair value of the award, and to recognize that cost over the period during which the employee is required to provide service (usually the vesting period of the award).  FAS 123R also requires the benefits of tax deductions in excess of recognized compensation cost to be reported as a financing cash flow, rather than as an operating cash flow as required under current literature. This requirement will reduce net operating cash flows and increase net financing cash flows in periods after adoption. The pro forma disclosures previously permitted under SFAS No. 123 no longer will be an alternative to financial statement recognition. On April 14, 2005, the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) delayed the implementation of SFAS No. 123R from its original implementation date by six months for most registrants, requiring all public companies to adopt FAS 123R no later than the beginning of the first fiscal year beginning after June 15, 2005. The impact of adopting SFAS No. 123R cannot be predicted at this time because it will depend on levels of share-based payments granted in the future. However, had the Company adopted SFAS No. 123R during the prior period, the results are expected to be consistent with the pro forma disclosure under SFAS No. 123, except that forfeitures will be considered in the calculation of compensation expense under SFAS No. 123R. When adopted, the Company may elect to change the valuation method or assumptions and such changes could have a material impact on the amount of stock-based compensation the Company records.

 

34



 

In March 2005, the Emerging Issues Task Force reached consensus on Issue No. 04-6, Accounting for Stripping Costs in the Mining Industry (“EITF No. 04-6”) concluding that post-production stripping costs are a component of mineral inventory costs subject to the provisions of the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants Accounting Research Bulletin No. 43, Restatement and Revision of Accounting Research Bulletins, Chapter 4, Inventory Pricing, (“ARB No. 43”).  The FASB ratified the EITF consensus. Based upon this consensus, post production stripping costs are considered costs of the extracted minerals under a full absorption costing system and are recognized as a component of inventory to be recognized in costs of sales in the same period as the revenue from the sale of the inventory. In addition, capitalization of such costs would be appropriate only to the extent inventory exists at the end of a reporting period. The guidance in this consensus will be effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2005, with early adoption permitted. The Company is currently evaluating this consensus and has not determined its impact to the consolidated financial statements.

 

35



 

ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK.

 

Commodity Price Risk

 

We manage our commodity price risk for coal sales through the use of long-term coal supply agreements rather than through the use of derivative instruments. As of March 31, 2005, we had sales commitments for approximately 98% of our planned 2005 production. Some of the products used in our mining activities, such as diesel fuel, explosives, steel products and electricity, are subject to price volatility. Through our suppliers, we utilize forward purchase contracts to manage the exposure related to this volatility.

 

Credit Risk

 

Our credit risk is primarily with electric power generators and, to a lesser extent, steel producers. Most electric power generators to whom we sell have investment grade credit ratings. Our policy is to independently evaluate each customer’s creditworthiness prior to entering into transactions and to constantly monitor outstanding accounts receivable against established credit limits. When appropriate (as determined by our credit management function), we have taken steps to reduce our credit exposure to customers that do not meet our credit standards or whose credit has deteriorated. These steps include obtaining letters of credit or cash collateral, requiring prepayments for shipments or establishing customer trust accounts held for our benefit in the event of a failure to pay.

 

Counterparty risk with respect to interest rate swaps is not considered to be significant based upon the creditworthiness of the participating financial institutions.

 

Interest Rate Risk

 

Historically, we have had exposure to changes in interest rates on a portion of our existing level of indebtedness under the Predecessor. This exposure had been completely hedged for the life of the debt using pay-fixed, receive-variable interest rate swaps. From July 30, 2004 forward, we have exposure to changes in interest rates on our bank term loan and our revolving credit facility. As described below, we have used interest rate swaps to manage this risk.

 

We entered into swap contracts for the purpose of complying with certain financial covenants in our senior secured credit facility that require fixing the interest rate for at least three years on a minimum of 50% of our total outstanding debt. The swap contracts cover $85 million to September 2007. The following table summarizes our outstanding swap contracts at March 31, 2005.

 

Notional Amount

 

Term

 

Floating Rate

 

Fixed Rate

 

$20 million

 

September 2004 – September 2007

 

3-month LIBOR

 

3.26

%

$25 million

 

September 2004 – September 2007

 

3-month LIBOR

 

3.26

%

$20 million

 

September 2004 – September 2007

 

3-month LIBOR

 

3.26

%

$20 million

 

September 2004 – September 2007

 

3-month LIBOR

 

3.26

%

 

As of March 31, 2005, after giving effect to the $85 million of interest rate swaps that were entered into, we had $300 million of variable rate indebtedness, representing approximately 44% of our outstanding indebtedness. A 1% change in interest rates would affect the interest expense on such indebtedness by $3.0 million. At March 31, 2005, the fair value of these swap agreements was an unrealized gain of $1.9 million. Effective January 1, 2005, these swaps were designated as hedges.  The increase in the unrealized gain of $1.4 million pre-tax ($0.8 million, net of tax) for the three months ended March 31, 2005 was reported as a component of comprehensive income (loss).

 

ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES.

 

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

 

We maintain disclosure controls and procedures and internal controls designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our filings under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, is recorded, processed, evaluated, summarized and reported accurately within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s (SEC) rules and forms. In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, our management recognized that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives and

 

36



 

management necessarily was required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures. An evaluation was performed under the supervision and with the participation of management, including the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) and Chief Financial Officer (CFO), of the effectiveness of the design and operations of our disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-14. Based upon that evaluation as of the end of the period covered by this report, the CEO and CFO concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective in timely alerting them to material information required to be included in our periodic SEC filings. The conclusions of the CEO and CFO from this evaluation were communicated to the Audit Committee. In connection with this evaluation, there were no breaches of such controls that would require disclosure to the Audit Committee or our auditors.

 

Changes in Disclosure Controls

 

There were no significant changes in our disclosure controls or in other factors that could significantly affect these disclosure controls in the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2005. Management is not aware of any material weaknesses; therefore, there were no corrective actions to be taken.

 

Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 Section 404

 

During the year ended December 31, 2004, we did not meet the definition of an Accelerated Filer because we have been a public company subject to the reporting requirements of Sections 13(a) and 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, for less than twelve months and we have not previously filed an Annual Report on Form 10-K. We are required to comply with the final Section 404 Rule of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005.

 

37



 

PART II-OTHER INFORMATION

 

Item 1.  Legal Proceedings.

 

Information required by this Item is contained in Note 17 to the consolidated financial statements entitled “Commitments and Contingencies” contained in this Report and is incorporated herein by reference.

 

Item 2.  Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.

 

None.

 

Item 3.  Defaults Upon Senior Securities.

 

None.

 

Item 4.  Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.

 

None.

 

Item 5.  Other Information.

 

(a)          The Form of Restricted Stock Agreement approved on February 15, 2005, by Foundation Coal Holdings, Inc’s Compensation Committee regarding restricted stock granted to its independent directors pursuant to the 2004 Incentive Stock Plan is attached as Exhibit 10.1

 

(b)         None.

 

Item 6. Exhibits.

 

(a) The exhibits to this report are listed in the Exhibit Index.

 

38



 

SIGNATURES

 

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

 

Date: May 16, 2005

 

Foundation Coal Corporation

 

 

(Registrant)

 

 

 

Name

 

Title

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

/s/ JAMES F. ROBERTS

 

President, Chief Executive Officer

 

 

James F. Roberts

 

and Director (Principal Executive
Officer)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

/s/ FRANK J. WOOD

 

Senior Vice President and Chief

 

 

Frank J. Wood

 

Financial Officer (Principal Financial
and Accounting Officer)

 

 

39



 

EXHIBIT INDEX

 

Exhibit No.

 

Description of Exhibit

2.1*

 

Stock Purchase Agreement, dated as of May 24, 2004, between RAG Coal International AG and Foundation Coal Corporation (formerly known as American Coal Acquisition Corp.)

 

 

 

2.2*

 

Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of August 9, 2004, between Foundation Coal Holdings, LLC and Foundation Coal Holdings, Inc.

 

 

 

3.1**

 

Form of Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Foundation Coal Holdings, Inc.

 

 

 

3.2**

 

Form of Amended and Restated By-laws of Foundation Coal Holdings, Inc.

 

 

 

4.1*

 

Form of certificate of Foundation Coal Holdings, Inc. common stock

 

 

 

4.2*

 

Amended and Restated Stockholders Agreement, dated as of October 4, 2004, by and among Foundation Coal Holdings, Inc., Blackstone FCH Capital Partners IV, L.P., Blackstone Family Investment Partnership IV-A L.P., First Reserve Fund IX, L.P., AMCI Acquisition, LLC and the management stockholders parties thereto

 

 

 

10.1***

 

Form of Independent Directors Restricted Stock Agreement.

 

 

 

31.1***

 

Certification of periodic report by Foundation Coal Corporation’s Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

 

 

 

31.2***

 

Certification of periodic report by Foundation Coal Corporation’s Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

 

 

 

32.1***

 

Certification of periodic report by Foundation Coal Corporation’s Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

 

 

 

32.2***

 

Certification of periodic report by Foundation Coal Corporation’s Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

 


* Incorporated by reference to the same numbered exhibit previously filed with Foundation Coal Holdings, Inc. registration statement on Form S-1 (SEC File No. 333-118427).

 

** Previously filed as an exhibit to Foundation Coal Corporation’s Registration Statement on Form S-4 (File No. 333-20979) and incorporated herein by reference.

 

***         Filed herewith.

 

40