UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One) |
||
ý |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
|
|
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
OR |
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
|
|
For the transition period from to . |
Commission File Number: 0-20625
DUKE REALTY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
Indiana |
|
35-1898425 |
(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization) |
|
(IRS Employer Identification Number) |
|
|
|
600 East 96th Street, Suite 100 |
|
46240 |
(Address of Principal Executive Offices) |
|
(Zip Code) |
Registrants telephone number, including area code: (317) 808-6000
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes ý No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act).
Yes o No ý
The number of Common Units outstanding as of April 30, 2005 was 156,969,629.
DUKE REALTY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
INDEX
PART I -
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1.
Financial Statements
DUKE REALTY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP AND SUBSIDIARIES
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
(in thousands)
|
|
March 31, |
|
December 31, |
|
||
ASSETS |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
||
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
|
||
Real estate investments: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Land and improvements |
|
$ |
722,210 |
|
$ |
710,379 |
|
Buildings and tenant improvements |
|
4,693,700 |
|
4,666,715 |
|
||
Construction in progress |
|
102,853 |
|
109,788 |
|
||
Investments in unconsolidated companies |
|
294,718 |
|
287,554 |
|
||
Land held for development |
|
412,710 |
|
393,100 |
|
||
|
|
6,226,191 |
|
6,167,536 |
|
||
Accumulated depreciation |
|
(825,902 |
) |
(788,900 |
) |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Net real estate investments |
|
5,400,289 |
|
5,378,636 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
3,181 |
|
5,770 |
|
||
Accounts receivable, net of allowance of $1,199 and $1,238 |
|
16,676 |
|
17,127 |
|
||
Straight-line rent receivable, net of allowance of $1,568 and $1,646 |
|
94,724 |
|
89,497 |
|
||
Receivables on construction contracts, including retentions |
|
70,033 |
|
59,342 |
|
||
Deferred financing costs, net of accumulated amortization of $10,379 and $9,006 |
|
31,013 |
|
31,924 |
|
||
Deferred leasing and other costs, net of accumulated amortization of $97,850 and $88,888 |
|
205,556 |
|
203,882 |
|
||
Escrow deposits and other assets |
|
122,591 |
|
108,466 |
|
||
|
|
$ |
5,944,063 |
|
$ |
5,894,644 |
|
LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Indebtedness: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Secured debt |
|
$ |
201,188 |
|
$ |
203,081 |
|
Unsecured notes |
|
2,150,565 |
|
2,315,623 |
|
||
Unsecured lines of credit |
|
272,000 |
|
|
|
||
|
|
2,623,753 |
|
2,518,704 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Construction payables and amounts due subcontractors, including retentions |
|
66,335 |
|
67,740 |
|
||
Accounts payable |
|
559 |
|
526 |
|
||
Accrued expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Real estate taxes |
|
60,398 |
|
55,745 |
|
||
Interest |
|
23,796 |
|
36,531 |
|
||
Other |
|
32,624 |
|
48,605 |
|
||
Other liabilities |
|
107,289 |
|
105,838 |
|
||
Tenant security deposits and prepaid rents |
|
37,984 |
|
39,827 |
|
||
Total liabilities |
|
2,952,738 |
|
2,873,516 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Partners equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
General Partner |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Common equity |
|
2,190,656 |
|
2,214,473 |
|
||
Preferred equity (liquidation preference of $657,250) |
|
616,780 |
|
616,780 |
|
||
|
|
2,807,436 |
|
2,831,253 |
|
||
Limited Partners common equity |
|
192,115 |
|
196,422 |
|
||
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
|
(8,226 |
) |
(6,547 |
) |
||
Total Partners equity |
|
2,991,325 |
|
3,021,128 |
|
||
|
|
$ |
5,944,063 |
|
$ |
5,894,644 |
|
See accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
2
DUKE
REALTY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP AND SUBSIDIARIES
Condensed Consolidated Statements of
Operations
For the three months ended March 31,
(in thousands, except per unit data)
(Unaudited)
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
||||
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
||
RENTAL OPERATIONS |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Rental income from continuing operations |
|
$ |
191,030 |
|
$ |
181,424 |
|
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated companies |
|
5,206 |
|
4,525 |
|
||
|
|
196,236 |
|
185,949 |
|
||
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Rental expenses |
|
44,296 |
|
39,100 |
|
||
Real estate taxes |
|
22,847 |
|
21,026 |
|
||
Interest expense |
|
35,226 |
|
32,196 |
|
||
Depreciation and amortization |
|
62,876 |
|
50,756 |
|
||
|
|
165,245 |
|
143,078 |
|
||
Earnings from continuing rental operations |
|
30,991 |
|
42,871 |
|
||
SERVICE OPERATIONS |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
General contractor gross revenue |
|
86,616 |
|
82,723 |
|
||
General contractor costs |
|
(79,559 |
) |
(76,036 |
) |
||
Net general contractor revenue |
|
7,057 |
|
6,687 |
|
||
Property management, maintenance and leasing fees |
|
3,879 |
|
3,935 |
|
||
Construction management and development activity income |
|
7,994 |
|
579 |
|
||
Other income |
|
2,765 |
|
234 |
|
||
Total revenue |
|
21,695 |
|
11,435 |
|
||
Operating expenses |
|
10,775 |
|
9,393 |
|
||
Total earnings from service operations |
|
10,920 |
|
2,042 |
|
||
General and administrative expense |
|
(7,580 |
) |
(8,317 |
) |
||
Operating income |
|
34,331 |
|
36,596 |
|
||
OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE) |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Interest income |
|
1,320 |
|
1,507 |
|
||
Earnings from sale of land, net of impairment adjustments |
|
143 |
|
4,629 |
|
||
Other expenses |
|
(78 |
) |
(3 |
) |
||
Other minority interest in earnings of subsidiaries |
|
(37 |
) |
(307 |
) |
||
Income from continuing operations |
|
35,679 |
|
42,422 |
|
||
Discontinued operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Net income from discontinued operations |
|
401 |
|
1,005 |
|
||
Gain on sale of discontinued operations, net of impairment adjustment |
|
3,701 |
|
4,009 |
|
||
Income from discontinued operations |
|
4,102 |
|
5,014 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Net income |
|
39,781 |
|
47,436 |
|
||
Dividends on preferred units |
|
(11,620 |
) |
(7,600 |
) |
||
Adjustments for redemption of preferred units |
|
|
|
(3,614 |
) |
||
Net income available for common unitholders |
|
$ |
28,161 |
|
$ |
36,222 |
|
Basic net income per common unit: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Continuing operations |
|
$ |
.15 |
|
$ |
.21 |
|
Discontinued operations |
|
.03 |
|
.03 |
|
||
Total |
|
$ |
.18 |
|
$ |
.24 |
|
Diluted net income per common unit: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Continuing operations |
|
$ |
.15 |
|
$ |
.20 |
|
Discontinued operations |
|
.03 |
|
.03 |
|
||
Total |
|
$ |
.18 |
|
$ |
.23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Weighted average number of common units outstanding |
|
156,947 |
|
152,444 |
|
||
Weighted average number of common units and dilutive potential common units |
|
157,720 |
|
156,913 |
|
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
3
DUKE
REALTY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP AND SUBSIDIARIES
Condensed Consolidated Statements of
Cash Flows
For the three months ended March 31,
(in thousands)
(Unaudited)
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
||
Cash flows from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Net income |
|
$ |
39,781 |
|
$ |
47,436 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Depreciation of buildings and tenant improvements |
|
51,563 |
|
43,012 |
|
||
Amortization of deferred leasing and other costs |
|
11,663 |
|
9,385 |
|
||
Amortization of deferred financing costs |
|
1,544 |
|
1,067 |
|
||
Minority interest in earnings |
|
37 |
|
308 |
|
||
Straight-line rent adjustment |
|
(6,170 |
) |
(5,892 |
) |
||
Earnings from land and depreciated property sales |
|
(3,843 |
) |
(8,638 |
) |
||
Build-for-sale operations, net |
|
5,562 |
|
(2,672 |
) |
||
Construction contracts, net |
|
(9,935 |
) |
(2,689 |
) |
||
Other accrued revenues and expenses, net |
|
(24,363 |
) |
(15,146 |
) |
||
Operating distributions received in excess of (less than) equity in earnings from unconsolidated companies |
|
(867 |
) |
3,399 |
|
||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
64,972 |
|
69,570 |
|
||
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Development of real estate investments |
|
(29,693 |
) |
(22,114 |
) |
||
Acquisition of real estate investments |
|
|
|
(9,606 |
) |
||
Acquisition of land held for development and infrastructure costs |
|
(34,742 |
) |
|
|
||
Recurring tenant improvements |
|
(13,732 |
) |
(14,244 |
) |
||
Recurring leasing costs |
|
(8,811 |
) |
(6,652 |
) |
||
Recurring building improvements |
|
(2,446 |
) |
(4,555 |
) |
||
Other deferred leasing costs |
|
(4,401 |
) |
(5,426 |
) |
||
Other deferred costs and other assets |
|
(1,786 |
) |
(7,153 |
) |
||
Tax deferred exchange escrow, net |
|
|
|
(1,334 |
) |
||
Proceeds from land and depreciated property sales, net |
|
13,608 |
|
29,405 |
|
||
Investment in secured mortgage loan |
|
|
|
(65,000 |
) |
||
Advances to unconsolidated companies |
|
(6,441 |
) |
(701 |
) |
||
Net cash used for investing activities |
|
(88,444 |
) |
(107,380 |
) |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Contributions from General Partner, common units |
|
633 |
|
8,534 |
|
||
Contributions from General Partner, preferred units |
|
|
|
144,975 |
|
||
Payments for redemption of General Partners preferred equity |
|
|
|
(102,621 |
) |
||
Payments for exercise of warrants |
|
|
|
(2,881 |
) |
||
Proceeds from indebtedness |
|
|
|
125,000 |
|
||
Payments on unsecured debt |
|
(100,000 |
) |
|
|
||
Proceeds (payments) from (on) term loan |
|
(65,000 |
) |
65,000 |
|
||
Payments on secured indebtedness including principal amortization |
|
(1,697 |
) |
(1,707 |
) |
||
Borrowings (payments) on lines of credit, net |
|
272,000 |
|
(121,000 |
) |
||
Distributions to common unitholders |
|
(72,971 |
) |
(69,722 |
) |
||
Distributions to preferred unitholders |
|
(11,620 |
) |
(6,381 |
) |
||
Distributions to minority interest |
|
|
|
(209 |
) |
||
Deferred financing costs |
|
(462 |
) |
(3,963 |
) |
||
Net cash provided by financing activities |
|
20,883 |
|
35,025 |
|
||
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents |
|
(2,589 |
) |
(2,785 |
) |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
|
5,770 |
|
12,695 |
|
||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
|
$ |
3,181 |
|
$ |
9,910 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Other non-cash items: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Conversion of Limited Partner Units to common shares of General Partner |
|
$ |
708 |
|
$ |
1,816 |
|
Conversion of Series D Preferred Units to common shares of General Partner |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
130,665 |
|
Issuance of Limited Partner Units for acquisition of minority interest |
|
$ |
15,000 |
|
$ |
|
|
See accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
4
DUKE REALTY
LIMITED PARTNERSHIP AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statements of Partners
Equity
For the three months ended March 31, 2005
(in thousands, except per unit data)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Limited |
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
General Partner |
|
Partners |
|
Other |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
Common |
|
Preferred |
|
Common |
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
Equity |
|
Equity |
|
Equity |
|
Income (Loss) |
|
Total |
|
|||||
Balance at December 31, 2004 |
|
$ |
2,214,473 |
|
$ |
616,780 |
|
$ |
196,422 |
|
$ |
(6,547 |
) |
$ |
3,021,128 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Comprehensive income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net income |
|
25,483 |
|
11,620 |
|
2,678 |
|
|
|
39,781 |
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Distributions to preferred unitholders |
|
|
|
(11,620 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(11,620 |
) |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Gains (losses) on derivative instruments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,679 |
) |
(1,679 |
) |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Comprehensive income available for common unitholders |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,482 |
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Capital contribution from General Partner |
|
683 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
683 |
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Acquisition of partnership interest for common stock of General Partner |
|
16,169 |
|
|
|
(15,461 |
) |
|
|
708 |
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Acquisition of minority interest in exchange for Limited Partner Units |
|
|
|
|
|
15,000 |
|
|
|
15,000 |
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Tax benefits from Employee Stock Plans |
|
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25 |
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
FASB 123 Compensation Expense |
|
282 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
282 |
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Distribution to General Partner |
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Distributions to partners ($.465 per Common Unit) |
|
(66,456 |
) |
|
|
(6,524 |
) |
|
|
(72,980 |
) |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Balance at March 31, 2005 |
|
$ |
2,190,656 |
|
$ |
616,780 |
|
$ |
192,115 |
|
$ |
(8,226 |
) |
$ |
2,991,325 |
|
See accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
5
DUKE REALTY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
1. General Basis of Presentation
The interim condensed consolidated financial statements included herein have been prepared by Duke Realty Limited Partnership (the Partnership) without audit (except for the Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2004). The financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for interim financial information and in accordance with Rule 10-01 of Regulation S-X of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring adjustments) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. These financial statements should be read in conjunction with Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations included herein and the condensed consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004.
Duke Realty Limited Partnership (the Partnership) was formed on October 4, 1993, when Duke Realty Corporation (the General Partner) contributed all of its properties and related assets and liabilities, along with the net proceeds from the issuance of additional shares of the General Partner through an offering, to the Partnership. Simultaneously, the Partnership completed the acquisition of Duke Associates, a full-service commercial real estate firm operating in the Midwest. The General Partner was formed in 1985 and qualifies as a Real Estate Investment Trust (REIT) under provisions of the Internal Revenue Code. The General Partner is the sole general partner of the Partnership, owning 91.4% of the common partnership interests as of March 31, 2005 (General Partner Units). The remaining 8.6% of the Partnerships common interest is owned by limited partners (Limited Partner Units and, together with the General Partner Units, the Common Units). The Limited Partner Units are exchangeable for shares of the General Partners common stock on a one-for-one basis subject generally to a one-year holding period. The General Partner also owns preferred partnership interests in the Partnership (Preferred Units).
We own and operate a portfolio of industrial, office and retail properties in the midwestern and southeastern United States and provides real estate services to third-party owners. We conduct Service Operations through Duke Realty Services LLC (DRS), Duke Realty Services Limited Partnership (DRSLP) and Duke Construction Limited Partnership (DCLP).
2. Indebtedness
We have one unsecured line of credit available at March 31, 2005, described as follows (in thousands):
Description |
|
Borrowing |
|
Maturity |
|
Interest |
|
Outstanding at March 31, 2005 |
|
Unsecured Line of Credit |
|
$500,000 |
|
January 2007 |
|
LIBOR + .60 |
% |
$272,000 |
|
The line of credit is used to fund development activities, acquire additional rental properties and provide working capital.
The line of credit provides us with an option to obtain borrowings from financial institutions that participate in the line, at rates lower than the stated interest rate, subject to certain restrictions. Amounts outstanding on the unsecured line of credit at March 31, 2005, range from LIBOR + .19 to .60 (3.00% to 3.45% at March 31, 2005).
6
The line of credit also contains financial covenants that require us to meet defined levels of performance. As of March 31, 2005, we are in compliance with all covenants and expect to remain in compliance for the foreseeable future.
In January 2005, we retired our $65.0 million variable rate term loan. In March 2005, we retired $100.0 million of 6.94% senior unsecured debt that matured.
3. Related Party Transactions
We provide property management, leasing, construction and other tenant related services to unconsolidated companies in which we have equity interests. For the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively, we received management fees of $1.2 million and $1.2 million, leasing fees of $922,000 and $815,000 and construction and development fees of $517,000 and $501,000 from these unconsolidated companies. These fees were recorded at market rates and we eliminated our ownership percentage of these fees in the condensed consolidated financial statements.
Effective as of January 1, 2005, the Partnership (DRLP), Duke Management, Inc. (DMI), an Indiana corporation, and DRSLP entered into a Contribution Agreement, pursuant to which DMI contributed to DRLP all of DMIs limited partnership interest in DRSLP in exchange for the issuance to DMI of 435,814 DRLP limited partnership units. This transaction was at fair market value and was recorded under the purchase accounting method. As a result, we now own 100% of the partnership interests in DRSLP. On March 1, 2005, DMI merged into the Partnership. For more details regarding this transaction, see our General Partners Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on January 4, 2005.
4. Net Income Per Common Unit
Basic net income per common unit is computed by dividing net income available for common units by the weighted average number of common units outstanding for the period. Diluted net income per common unit is computed by dividing the sum of net income available for common unitholders by the sum of the weighted average number of common units outstanding, including any dilutive potential common units for the period.
The following table reconciles the components of basic and diluted net income per common unit for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively (in thousands):
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
||
Basic net income available for common unitholders |
|
$ |
28,161 |
|
$ |
36,222 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Weighted average number of common units outstanding |
|
156,947 |
|
152,444 |
|
||
Weighted average conversion of Series D preferred units (1) |
|
|
|
3,510 |
|
||
Dilutive shares for stock-based compensation plan |
|
773 |
|
959 |
|
||
Weighted average number of common units and dilutive potential common units |
|
157,720 |
|
156,913 |
|
||
(1) The General Partner called for the redemption of the Series D preferred units as of March 16, 2004. Prior to the redemption date, nearly 5.3 million Series D preferred units were converted into 4.9 million common units. These units represent the weighted effect, assuming the Series D units had been converted on January 1, 2004.
7
5. Segment Reporting
We are engaged in four operating segments, the first three of which consist of the ownership and rental of office, industrial and retail real estate investments (collectively, Rental Operations). The fourth segment consists of our build-to-suit for sale operations and the providing of various real estate services such as property management, maintenance, leasing, development and construction management to third-party property owners and joint ventures (Service Operations). Our reportable segments offer different products or services and are managed separately because each requires different operating strategies and management expertise. There are no material intersegment sales or transfers.
Non-segment revenue consists mainly of equity in earnings of unconsolidated companies. Segment FFO information is calculated by subtracting operating expenses attributable to the applicable segment from segment revenues. Non-segment assets consist of corporate assets including cash, deferred financing costs and investments in unconsolidated companies. Interest expense and other non-property specific revenues and expenses are not allocated to individual segments in determining our performance measure.
We assess and measure segment operating results based upon an industry performance measure referred to as Funds From Operations (FFO), which management believes is a useful indicator of our operating performance. Funds From Operations is used by industry analysts and investors as a supplemental operating performance measure of an equity real estate investment trust (REIT). FFO is calculated in accordance with the definition that was adopted by the Board of Governors of the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts (NAREIT). FFO, as defined by NAREIT, represents net income (loss) determined in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP), excluding extraordinary items as defined under GAAP and gains or losses from sales of previously depreciated operating real estate assets, plus certain non-cash items such as real estate asset depreciation and amortization, and after similar adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures.
The revenues and FFO for each of the reportable segments for the three months ended March 31, 2005, and 2004, and the assets for each of the reportable segments as of March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004, are summarized as follows (in thousands):
8
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
||||
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
||
Revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Rental Operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Office |
|
$ |
119,289 |
|
$ |
111,701 |
|
Industrial |
|
69,583 |
|
67,403 |
|
||
Retail |
|
1,042 |
|
1,161 |
|
||
Service Operations |
|
21,695 |
|
11,435 |
|
||
Total Segment Revenues |
|
211,609 |
|
191,700 |
|
||
Non-Segment Revenue |
|
6,322 |
|
5,683 |
|
||
Consolidated Revenue from continuing operations |
|
217,931 |
|
197,383 |
|
||
Discontinued Operations |
|
1,535 |
|
5,678 |
|
||
Consolidated Revenue |
|
$ |
219,466 |
|
$ |
203,061 |
|
Funds From Operations |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Rental Operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Office |
|
$ |
73,584 |
|
$ |
71,000 |
|
Industrial |
|
49,555 |
|
49,188 |
|
||
Retail |
|
803 |
|
915 |
|
||
Services Operations |
|
10,920 |
|
2,042 |
|
||
Total Segment FFO |
|
134,862 |
|
123,145 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Non-Segment FFO: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Interest expense |
|
(35,226 |
) |
(32,196 |
) |
||
Interest income |
|
1,320 |
|
1,507 |
|
||
General and administrative expense |
|
(7,581 |
) |
(8,317 |
) |
||
Gain on land sales |
|
143 |
|
4,629 |
|
||
Impairment adjustments on depreciable property |
|
(2,809 |
) |
|
|
||
Other income (expenses) |
|
(133 |
) |
193 |
|
||
Minority interest in earnings of subsidiaries |
|
(37 |
) |
(307 |
) |
||
Joint venture FFO |
|
10,072 |
|
9,112 |
|
||
Dividends on preferred units |
|
(11,620 |
) |
(7,600 |
) |
||
Adjustment for redemption of preferred units |
|
|
|
(3,614 |
) |
||
Discontinued operations |
|
751 |
|
2,646 |
|
||
Consolidated FFO |
|
89,742 |
|
89,198 |
|
||
Depreciation and amortization on continuing operations |
|
(62,876 |
) |
(50,756 |
) |
||
Depreciation and amortization on discontinued operations |
|
(350 |
) |
(1,641 |
) |
||
Share of joint venture adjustments |
|
(4,865 |
) |
(4,588 |
) |
||
Earnings from depreciated property sales on discontinued operations |
|
6,510 |
|
4,009 |
|
||
Net income available for common unitholders |
|
$ |
28,161 |
|
$ |
36,222 |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
December 31, |
|
||
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
||
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Rental Operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Office |
|
$ |
3,093,225 |
|
$ |
3,128,387 |
|
Industrial |
|
2,239,441 |
|
2,211,509 |
|
||
Retail |
|
111,691 |
|
84,625 |
|
||
Service Operations |
|
154,871 |
|
131,218 |
|
||
Total Segment Assets |
|
5,599,228 |
|
5,555,739 |
|
||
Non-Segment Assets |
|
344,835 |
|
338,905 |
|
||
Consolidated Assets |
|
$ |
5,944,063 |
|
$ |
5,894,644 |
|
9
In addition to revenues and FFO, we also review our recurring capital expenditures in measuring the performance of our individual Rental Operations segments. These recurring capital expenditures consist of tenant improvements, leasing commissions and building improvements. We review these expenditures to determine the costs associated with re-leasing vacant space and maintaining the condition of our properties. Our recurring capital expenditures by segment are summarized as follows for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively (in thousands):
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
||
Recurring Capital Expenditures |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Office |
|
$ |
13,761 |
|
$ |
15,062 |
|
Industrial |
|
11,228 |
|
10,371 |
|
||
Retail |
|
|
|
18 |
|
||
Total |
|
$ |
24,989 |
|
$ |
25,451 |
|
6. Real Estate Investments
We have classified the operations of 50 buildings as discontinued operations as of March 31, 2005. These 50 buildings consist of 41 industrial, six office and three retail properties. As a result, we classified net income from operations of $401,000 and $1.0 million as net income from discontinued operations for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively. Two of the properties classified in discontinued operations were sold during the first quarter of 2005 and 41 properties were sold during 2004. The gains on disposal of these properties, net of impairment adjustments of $3.7 million and $4.0 million for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively, are also reported in discontinued operations.
At March 31, 2005, we had five industrial properties, one office property and one retail property, which comprised approximately 660,000 square feet classified as held-for-sale. At March 31, 2005, these properties have signed contracts, but there can be no assurance that such properties classified as held-for-sale will be sold.
The following table illustrates the operations of the 50 buildings reflected in discontinued operations, at March 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively (in thousands):
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
||||
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
||
Statement of Operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Revenues |
|
$ |
1,535 |
|
$ |
5,678 |
|
Expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Operating |
|
522 |
|
1,876 |
|
||
Interest |
|
261 |
|
1,151 |
|
||
Depreciation and Amortization |
|
350 |
|
1,641 |
|
||
General and Administrative |
|
1 |
|
6 |
|
||
Operating Income |
|
401 |
|
1,004 |
|
||
Other Income |
|
|
|
1 |
|
||
Income from discontinued operations, before gain on sale |
|
401 |
|
1,005 |
|
||
Gain on sale of property, net of impairment adjustments |
|
3,701 |
|
4,009 |
|
||
Income from discontinued operations |
|
$ |
4,102 |
|
$ |
5,014 |
|
10
The following table illustrates the aggregate balance sheet of our seven properties identified as held-for-sale at March 31, 2005 (in thousands):
|
|
March 31, 2005 |
|
|
Balance Sheet: |
|
|
|
|
Real estate investments, net |
|
$ |
22,179 |
|
Other Assets |
|
1,032 |
|
|
Total Assets |
|
$ |
23,211 |
|
Accrued Expenses |
|
$ |
231 |
|
Other Liabilities |
|
196 |
|
|
Equity |
|
22,784 |
|
|
Total Liabilities and Equity |
|
$ |
23,211 |
|
We allocate interest expense to discontinued operations as permitted under EITF 87-24, Allocation of Interest to Discontinued Operations, and have included such interest expense in computing net income from discontinued operations. Interest expense allocable to discontinued operations includes interest on any debt on secured properties included in discontinued operations and an allocable share of our consolidated unsecured interest expense for unencumbered properties. The allocation of unsecured interest expense to discontinued operations was based upon the gross book value of the discontinued operations unencumbered population as it related to our entire unencumbered population.
For the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, we recorded impairment adjustments of $2.8 million and $100,000, respectively. The $2.8 million of impairment recorded in the first quarter of 2005 reflects the write-down of the carrying value of one held-for-sale office building, five held-for-sale industrial buildings and one land parcel contracted to sell in 2005. The $100,000 impairment recorded in the first quarter of 2004 reflects the write-down of the carrying value of a land parcel that was later sold in 2004.
Effective January 1, 2005, we have changed the estimated useful lives on building improvements from 40 years to a 10-year life. This change has been applied prospectively. The change in estimated useful lives is based upon managements belief that a 10-year life on building improvements represents a better estimate of the assets useful life. These building improvements will continue to be depreciated using the straight-line method.
7. Partners Equity
The General Partner periodically accesses the public equity markets to fund the development and acquisition of additional rental properties or to pay down debt. The proceeds of these offerings are contributed to us in exchange for an additional interest in the Partnership.
The following series of preferred units are outstanding as of March 31, 2005 (in thousands, except percentage data):
|
|
Units |
|
Dividend |
|
Redemption |
|
Liquidation |
|
|
|
|
Description |
|
Outstanding |
|
Rate |
|
Date |
|
Preference |
|
Convertible |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Series B Preferred |
|
265 |
|
7.990 |
% |
September 30, 2007 |
|
$ |
132,250 |
|
No |
|
Series I Preferred |
|
300 |
|
8.450 |
% |
February 6, 2006 |
|
75,000 |
|
No |
|
|
Series J Preferred |
|
400 |
|
6.625 |
% |
August 29, 2008 |
|
100,000 |
|
No |
|
|
Series K Preferred |
|
600 |
|
6.500 |
% |
February 13, 2009 |
|
150,000 |
|
No |
|
|
Series L Preferred |
|
800 |
|
6.600 |
% |
November 30, 2009 |
|
200,000 |
|
No |
|
|
The dividend rate on the Series B preferred units increases to 9.99% after September 12, 2012.
11
All series of preferred units require cumulative distributions and have no stated maturity date (although we may redeem them on or following their optional redemption dates).
The Series B, Series I, Series J, Series K and Series L preferred units may be redeemed on or after the dates noted above only at our option, in whole or in part.
8. Reclassifications
Certain 2004 balances have been reclassified to conform to the 2005 presentation.
9. Financial Instruments
We are exposed to capital market risk, such as changes in interest rates. In order to manage the volatility relating to interest rate risk, we may enter into interest rate hedging arrangements from time to time. We do not utilize derivative financial instruments for trading or speculative purposes. We account for derivative instruments under Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities as amended (SFAS 133).
In March 2005, we entered into $300.0 million of cash flow hedges through forward-starting interest rate swaps to hedge interest rates on $300.0 million of estimated debt offerings in 2006. The swaps qualify for hedge accounting under SFAS 133 with any changes in fair value recorded in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (OCI). Due to a decline in rates, the fair value at the end of the first quarter is a liability of $1.8 million.
In May 2003, the FASB issued SFAS No. 150, Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Characteristics of both Liabilities and Equity (SFAS 150). SFAS 150 establishes standards for classifying and measuring as liabilities certain financial instruments that embody obligations of the issuer and have characteristics of both liabilities and equity. SFAS 150 is effective for all financial instruments created or modified after May 31, 2003, and otherwise is effective July 1, 2003. We include the operations of one joint
venture in our condensed consolidated financial statements at March 31, 2005. This joint venture is partially owned by unaffiliated parties that have noncontrolling interests. SFAS 150 requires the disclosure of the estimated settlement value of these noncontrolling interests. As of March 31, 2005, the estimated settlement value of the noncontrolling interest in this consolidated joint venture was approximately $1.1 million as compared to the receivable asset recorded on our books for this joint venture of $105,000.
10. Stock Based Compensation
Under the limited partnership agreement of the partnership, the Partnership is required to issue one Common Unit to the General Partner for each share of common stock issued by the General Partner. Accordingly, the issuance of common shares by the General Partner under its stock based compensation plans requires the issuance of a corresponding number of Common Units by the Partnership to the General Partner.
For all issuances prior to 2002, the Partnership applies the recognition and measurement provisions of APB Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, and related Interpretations in accounting for its stock based compensation. Effective January 1, 2002, the Partnership prospectively adopted the fair value recognition provisions of FASB Statement No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, to all awards granted after January 1, 2002.
12
The following table illustrates the effect on net income and earnings per unit if the fair value method had been applied to all outstanding and unvested awards in each period (in thousands except per unit data).
|
|
Three Months ended March 31, |
|
|||||
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
|||
Net income available for common unitholders, as reported |
|
$ |
28,161 |
|
$ |
36,222 |
|
|
Add: Stock-based employee compensation expense included in net income determined under fair value method |
|
282 |
|
101 |
|
|||
Deduct: Total stock based compensation expense determined under fair value method for all awards |
|
(415 |
) |
(220 |
) |
|||
Proforma net income available for common unitholders |
|
$ |
28,028 |
|
$ |
36,103 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Basic net income per unit |
As reported |
|
$ |
.18 |
|
$ |
.24 |
|
|
Pro forma |
|
$ |
.18 |
|
$ |
.24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Diluted net income per unit |
As reported |
|
$ |
.18 |
|
$ |
.24 |
|
|
Pro forma |
|
$ |
.18 |
|
$ |
.23 |
|
11. Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In December 2004, FASB issued SFAS No. 123 (R), Share-Based Payment, which is a revision of SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock Based Compensation. In April 2005, the SEC delayed the effective date on SFAS No. 123 (R) from July 2005 to January 2006. We are currently evaluating the impact on our financial position and results of operations, but do not believe that the adoption of SFAS 123 (R) will have a material impact on our financial statements.
12. Subsequent Events
Declaration of Distributions
The General Partners Board of Directors declared the following distributions at its April 27, 2005, regularly scheduled Board meeting:
|
|
Quarterly |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class |
|
Amount/Unit |
|
Record Date |
|
Payment Date |
|
|
Common |
|
$ |
0.465 |
|
May 12, 2005 |
|
May 31, 2005 |
|
Preferred (per depositary share): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Series B |
|
$ |
0.99875 |
|
June 16, 2005 |
|
June 30, 2005 |
|
Series I |
|
$ |
0.52813 |
|
June 16, 2005 |
|
June 30, 2005 |
|
Series J |
|
$ |
0.41406 |
|
May 17, 2005 |
|
May 31, 2005 |
|
Series K |
|
$ |
0.40625 |
|
May 17, 2005 |
|
May 31, 2005 |
|
Series L |
|
$ |
0.41250 |
|
May 17, 2005 |
|
May 31, 2005 |
|
13
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
The Partners
Duke Realty Limited Partnership:
We have reviewed the condensed consolidated balance sheet of Duke Realty Limited Partnership and subsidiaries as of March 31, 2005, the related condensed consolidated statements of operations and cash flows for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, and the related condensed consolidated statement of partners equity for the three months ended March 31, 2005. These condensed consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnerships management.
We conducted our review in accordance with standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). A review of interim financial information consists principally of applying analytical procedures to financial data and making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and accounting matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the objective of which is the expression of an opinion regarding the financial statements taken as a whole. Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.
Based on our review, we are not aware of any material modifications that should be made to the condensed consolidated financial statements referred to above for them to be in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
We have previously audited, in accordance with standards established by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheet of Duke Realty Limited Partnership and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2004, and the related consolidated statements of operations, partners equity and cash flows for the year then ended (not presented herein); and in our report dated February 28, 2005, we expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements. In our opinion, the information set forth in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2004, is fairly presented, in all material respects, in relation to the consolidated balance sheet from which it has been derived.
KPMG LLP
Indianapolis, Indiana
May 13, 2005
14
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward Looking Statements
Certain statements in this quarterly report, including those related to our future operations, constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. These forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other important factors that could cause our actual results, performance or achievements, or industry results, to differ materially from any predictions of future results, performance or achievements that we express or imply in this report. Some of the risks, uncertainties and other important factors that may affect future results include, among others:
Changes in general economic and business conditions, including performance of financial markets;
Our continued qualification as a real estate investment trust;
Heightened competition for tenants and potential decreases in property occupancy;
Potential increases in real estate construction costs;
Potential changes in the financial markets and interest rates;
Continuing ability to favorably raise debt and equity in the capital markets;
Inherent risks in the real estate business including tenant defaults, potential liability relating to environmental matters and liquidity of real estate investments; and
Other risks and uncertainties described from time-to-time in our filings with the SEC.
This list of risks and uncertainties, however, is not intended to be exhaustive. We have on file with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) a Current Report on Form 8-K dated September 5, 2003, with additional risk factor information.
The words believe, estimate, expect, anticipate, intend, plan, seek and similar expressions or statements regarding future periods are intended to identify forward-looking statements. Although we believe that the plans, expectations and results expressed in or suggested by the forward-looking statements are reasonable, all forward-looking statements are inherently uncertain as they involve substantial risks and uncertainties beyond our control. New factors emerge from time to time, and it is not possible for us to predict the nature or assess the potential impact of each new factor on our business. Given these uncertainties, we caution you not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements. We undertake no obligation to update or revise any of our forward-looking statements for events or circumstances that arise after the statement is made.
Business Overview
As of March 31, 2005, we:
Owned or controlled 898 industrial, office and retail properties (including properties under development), consisting of approximately 115.2 million square feet located in 13 operating platforms; and
Owned or controlled approximately 4,400 acres of land with an estimated future development potential of approximately 65 million square feet of industrial, office and retail properties.
15
We provide the following services for our properties and for certain properties owned by third parties and joint ventures:
Property leasing;
Property management;
Construction;
Development; and
Other tenant-related services.
Key Performance Indicators
Our operating results depend primarily upon rental income from our office, industrial and retail properties (Rental Operations). The following highlights the areas of Rental Operations that we consider critical for future revenue growth (all square footage totals and occupancy percentages reflect both wholly-owned properties and properties in joint ventures):
Occupancy Analysis: Our ability to maintain occupancy rates is a principal driver of our results of operations. The following table sets forth occupancy information regarding our in-service portfolio of rental properties as of March 31, 2005 and 2004 (in thousands, except percentage data):
|
|
Total |
|
Percent of |
|
Percent Occupied |
|
||||||
Type |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
Industrial |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service Centers |
|
12,889 |
|
13,200 |
|
11.5 |
% |
12.2 |
% |
86.4 |
% |
84.9 |
% |
Bulk |
|
70,324 |
|
66,850 |
|
62.8 |
% |
62.1 |
% |
92.4 |
% |
91.3 |
% |
Office |
|
28,201 |
|
26,891 |
|
25.2 |
% |
25.0 |
% |
87.5 |
% |
86.9 |
% |
Retail |
|
596 |
|
738 |
|
0.5 |
% |
0.7 |
% |
96.8 |
% |
98.5 |
% |
Total |
|
112,010 |
|
107,679 |
|
100.0 |
% |
100.0 |
% |
90.5 |
% |
89.5 |
% |
Lease Expiration and Renewal: Our ability to maintain and grow occupancy rates primarily depends upon our continuing ability to re-lease expiring space. The following table reflects our in-service portfolio lease expiration schedule as of March 31, 2005, by property type. The table indicates square footage and annualized net effective rents (based on March 2005 rental revenue) under expiring leases (in thousands):
|
|
Total |
|
Industrial |
|
Office |
|
Retail |
|
||||||||||||||
Year of |
|
Square |
|
Ann. Rent |
|
Percent of |
|
Square |
|
Ann. Rent |
|
Square |
|
Ann. Rent |
|
Square |
|
Ann. Rent |
|
||||
Expiration |
|
Feet |
|
Revenue |
|
Revenue |
|
Feet |
|
Revenue |
|
Feet |
|
Revenue |
|
Feet |
|
Revenue |
|
||||
2005 |
|
9,362 |
|
$ |
58,286 |
|
9 |
% |
7,628 |
|
$ |
34,694 |
|
1,728 |
|
$ |
23,509 |
|
6 |
|
$ |
83 |
|
2006 |
|
12,001 |
|
79,305 |
|
12 |
% |
9,546 |
|
45,672 |
|
2,455 |
|
33,633 |
|
|
|
- |
|
||||
2007 |
|
12,761 |
|
82,213 |
|
12 |
% |
9,984 |
|
45,994 |
|
2,768 |
|
36,096 |
|
9 |
|
123 |
|
||||
2008 |
|
13,328 |
|
83,274 |
|
12 |
% |
10,367 |
|
45,915 |
|
2,942 |
|
37,024 |
|
19 |
|
335 |
|
||||
2009 |
|
12,877 |
|
86,373 |
|
13 |
% |
9,440 |
|
41,899 |
|
3,429 |
|
44,344 |
|
8 |
|
130 |
|
||||
2010 |
|
10,185 |
|
78,968 |
|
12 |
% |
7,113 |
|
36,408 |
|
3,064 |
|
42,399 |
|
8 |
|
161 |
|
||||
2011 |
|
5,631 |
|
43,964 |
|
6 |
% |
3,854 |
|
18,520 |
|
1,758 |
|
25,105 |
|
19 |
|
339 |
|
||||
2012 |
|
6,178 |
|
37,334 |
|
5 |
% |
4,683 |
|
18,065 |
|
1,488 |
|
18,936 |
|
7 |
|
333 |
|
||||
2013 |
|
4,849 |
|
44,083 |
|
6 |
% |
2,640 |
|
11,296 |
|
2,177 |
|
32,282 |
|
32 |
|
505 |
|
||||
2014 |
|
4,353 |
|
21,243 |
|
3 |
% |
3,690 |
|
12,732 |
|
663 |
|
8,511 |
|
|
|
|
|
||||
2015 and Thereafter |
|
9,822 |
|
65,607 |
|
10 |
% |
7,161 |
|
29,614 |
|
2,193 |
|
33,152 |
|
468 |
|
2,841 |
|
||||
Total Leased |
|
101,347 |
|
$ |
680,650 |
|
100 |
% |
76,106 |
|
$ |
340,809 |
|
24,665 |
|
$ |
334,991 |
|
576 |
|
$ |
4,850 |
|
Total Portfolio Square Feet |
|
112,010 |
|
|
|
|
|
83,213 |
|
|
|
28,201 |
|
|
|
596 |
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Percent Occupied |
|
90.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
91.1 |
% |
|
|
87.5 |
% |
|
|
96.8 |
% |
|
|
We renewed 75.4% and 73.1% of leases up for renewal totaling approximately 1.8 million and 3.0 million square feet on which we attained a 2.5% and 3.6% growth in net effective rents in the three months ended
16
March 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively. The decline in rental rate growth is indicative of excess vacancies in many of our markets requiring competitive pricing strategies to retain current tenants. Our lease renewal percentages over the past three years have remained relatively consistent at a 70-75% success rate despite the relatively weak market conditions.
The average term of renewals decreased from 4.4 years as of March 31, 2004 to 3.5 years as of March 31, 2005.
Future Development: Another source of growth in earnings is the development of additional properties. These properties should provide future earnings through Service Operations income upon sale or from Rental Operations growth as they are placed in service. At March 31, 2005, we had 3.2 million square feet of property under development with total costs of $200.0 million which was 52% pre-leased. This compares to 2.1 million square feet with a total cost of $98.2 million, which was 88% pre-leased at March 31, 2004. We have increased our held-for-rental development volume as a result of improving market conditions. This increase includes additional speculative developments that generally result in lower pre-leased levels.
A summary of properties under development as of March 31, 2005, follows (in thousands, except percentage data):
Anticipated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Anticipated |
|
|
In-Service |
|
Square |
|
Percent |
|
Project |
|
Stabilized |
|
|
Date |
|
Feet |
|
Leased |
|
Costs |
|
Return |
|
|
Held for Rental: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2nd Quarter 2005 |
|
978 |
|
70 |
% |
$ |
40,871 |
|
9.8 |
% |
3rd Quarter 2005 |
|
450 |
|
29 |
% |
28,536 |
|
10.2 |
% |
|
4th Quarter 2005 |
|
835 |
|
17 |
% |
37,826 |
|
10.4 |
% |
|
Thereafter |
|
561 |
|
65 |
% |
64,338 |
|
10.3 |
% |
|
|
|
2,824 |
|
47 |
% |
$ |
171,571 |
|
10.2 |
% |
Held-for-sale: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2nd Quarter 2005 |
|
200 |
|
100 |
% |
$ |
6,216 |
|
9.3 |
% |
3rd Quarter 2005 |
|
83 |
|
78 |
% |
13,129 |
|
9.5 |
% |
|
4th Quarter 2005 |
|
69 |
|
100 |
% |
9,037 |
|
9.7 |
% |
|
Thereafter |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
352 |
|
95 |
% |
$ |
28,382 |
|
9.5 |
% |
Total |
|
3,176 |
|
52 |
% |
$ |
199,953 |
|
10.1 |
% |
Acquisition and Disposition Activity: Sales proceeds from dispositions of held-for-rental properties for the first quarter of 2005 and 2004 were $13.6 and $16.9 million, respectively. The disposition proceeds were used to fund acquisitions during 2005 and 2004 of $12.5 million and $15.4 million, respectively. We will continue to pursue both disposition and acquisition opportunities that arise and are in line with our business plan.
Funds From Operations
Funds From Operations (FFO) is used by industry analysts and investors as a supplemental operating performance measure of an equity real estate investment trust (REIT). FFO is calculated in accordance with the definition that was adopted by the Board of Governors of the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts (NAREIT). FFO, as defined by NAREIT, represents net income (loss) determined in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP), excluding extraordinary items as defined under GAAP and gains or losses from sales of previously depreciated operating real estate assets, plus certain non-cash items such as real estate asset depreciation and amortization, and after similar adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures.
17
Historical cost accounting for real estate assets in accordance with GAAP implicitly assumes that the value of real estate assets diminishes predictably over time. Since real estate values instead have historically risen or fallen with market conditions, many industry investors and analysts have considered presentation of operating results for real estate companies that use historical cost accounting to be insufficient by themselves. Thus, NAREIT created FFO as a supplemental measure of REIT operating performance that excludes historical cost depreciation, among other items, from GAAP net income. Management believes that the use of FFO, combined with the required primary GAAP presentations, has improved the understanding of operating results of REITs among the investing public and made comparisons of REIT operating results more meaningful. Management considers FFO to be a useful measure for reviewing comparative operating and financial performance (although FFO should be reviewed in conjunction with net income which remains the primary measure of performance) because, by excluding gains or losses related to sales of previously depreciated operating real estate assets and excluding real estate asset depreciation and amortization, FFO assists in comparing the operating performance of a companys real estate between periods or as compared to different companies.
The following table summarizes the calculation of FFO for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004 , respectively (in thousands):
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
||
Net income available for common unitholders |
|
$ |
28,161 |
|
$ |
36,222 |
|
Add back (deduct): |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Depreciation and amortization |
|
63,226 |
|
52,397 |
|
||
Share of joint venture adjustments |
|
4,865 |
|
4,588 |
|
||
Earnings from depreciable property dispositions |
|
(6,510 |
) |
(4,009 |
) |
||
Funds From Operations |
|
$ |
89,742 |
|
$ |
89,198 |
|
Results of Operations
A summary of our operating results and property statistics for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, is as follows (in thousands, except number of properties and per unit data):
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
||
Rental Operations revenues from Continuing Operations |
|
$ |
196,236 |
|
$ |
185,949 |
|
Service Operations revenues from Continuing Operations |
|
21,695 |
|
11,435 |
|
||
Earnings from Continuing Rental Operations |
|
30,991 |
|
42,871 |
|
||
Earnings from Continuing Service Operations |
|
10,920 |
|
2,042 |
|
||
Operating income |
|
34,331 |
|
36,596 |
|
||
Net income available for common units |
|
$ |
28,161 |
|
$ |
36,222 |
|
Weighted average common units outstanding |
|
156,947 |
|
152,444 |
|
||
Weighted average common and dilutive potential common units |
|
157,720 |
|
156,913 |
|
||
Basic income per common unit: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Continuing operations |
|
$ |
.15 |
|
$ |
.21 |
|
Discontinued operations |
|
$ |
.03 |
|
$ |
.03 |
|
Diluted income per common unit: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Continuing operations |
|
$ |
.15 |
|
$ |
.20 |
|
Discontinued operations |
|
$ |
.03 |
|
$ |
.03 |
|
Number of in-service properties at end of period |
|
898 |
|
899 |
|
||
In-service square footage at end of period |
|
112,010 |
|
107,679 |
|
||
Under development square footage at end of period |
|
3,176 |
|
2,061 |
|
Comparison of Three Months Ended March 31, 2005 to Three Months Ended March 31, 2004
Rental Income From Continuing Operations
Overall, rental income from continuing operations increased from $181.4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2004 to $191.0 million for the same period in 2005. The following table reconciles rental income
18
from continuing operations by reportable segment to our total reported rental income from continuing operations for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively (in thousands):
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
||
Office |
|
$ |
119,289 |
|
111,701 |
|
|
Industrial |
|
69,583 |
|
67,403 |
|
||
Retail |
|
1,042 |
|
1,161 |
|
||
Non-segment |
|
1,116 |
|
1,159 |
|
||
Total |
|
$ |
191,030 |
|
$ |
181,424 |
|
Our three reportable segments comprising Rental Operations (office, industrial and retail) are all within the real estate industry; however, the same economic and industry conditions do not necessarily affect each segment. The primary causes of the increase in rental income from continuing operations, with specific references to a particular segment when applicable, are summarized below:
We acquired 18 properties and placed 17 developments in service from April 1, 2004 to March 31, 2005. These acquisitions and developments are the primary factor in the overall $9.6 million increase in rental revenue for the first quarter of 2005 compared to the same period in 2004. Acquisitions and developments placed in service in the last three quarters of 2004 and the first quarter of 2005 provided revenues of $10.1 million in the first quarter of 2005. The $10.1 million includes $5.5 million from two large acquisitions of office buildings in Atlanta and Cincinnati.
Lease termination fees totaled $1.8 million for the first quarter of 2005 compared to $4.3 million for the same period in 2004. The decrease in termination fees continues a downward trend associated with an improving economy.
Rental Expenses and Real Estate Taxes
The following table reconciles rental expenses and real estate taxes by reportable segment to our total reported amounts in the statement of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively (in thousands):
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
||
Rental Expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Office |
|
$ |
32,732 |
|
$ |
28,553 |
|
Industrial |
|
11,308 |
|
10,215 |
|
||
Retail |
|
155 |
|
152 |
|
||
Non-segment |
|
101 |
|
180 |
|
||
Total |
|
$ |
44,296 |
|
$ |
39,100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Real Estate Taxes: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Office |
|
$ |
12,973 |
|
$ |
11,848 |
|
Industrial |
|
8,720 |
|
8,001 |
|
||
Retail |
|
84 |
|
92 |
|
||
Non-segment |
|
1,070 |
|
1,085 |
|
||
Total |
|
$ |
22,847 |
|
$ |
21,026 |
|
The overall increase in rental expenses and real estate taxes is the result of our increased real estate assets associated with the acquisitions and developments as noted above.
Interest Expense
Interest expense increased from $32.2 million in the first quarter of 2004 to $35.2 million in the first quarter of 2005 resulting primarily from a net increase in unsecured long-term debt. Our long-term unsecured debt increased by a net $185 million since March 31, 2004, resulting in an increase in interest expense of $2.7 million.
19
Depreciation and Amortization
Depreciation and amortization expense increased from $50.8 million during the three months ended March 31, 2004 to $62.9 million for the same period in 2005.
The following highlights the significant changes in depreciation expense for these time periods:
Building depreciation expense increased by $4.1 million due to increases in our held-for-rental asset base from acquisitions and developments.
Depreciation expense on tenant improvements increased by $4.4 million and lease commission amortization increased by $2.3 million due to increased leasing activity and the effect of SFAS 141, Business Combinations (SFAS 141) on acquisitions. SFAS 141 requires the allocation of a portion of a propertys purchase price to existing tenant improvements and intangible assets for leases acquired and in-place at the time of acquisition. We amortize these assets over the remaining life of the leases.
Service Operations
Service Operations primarily consist of our merchant building sales and the leasing, management, construction and development services for joint venture properties and properties owned by third parties. These operations are heavily influenced by the current state of the economy as leasing and management fees are dependent upon occupancy while construction and development services rely on businesses expanding operations. Service Operations earnings increased from $2.0 million for the three months ended March 31, 2004 to $10.9 million for the three months ended March 31, 2005, primarily as a result of the following:
Our merchant building development and sales program, whereby a building is developed and then sold, is a significant component of construction and development income. During the first quarter of 2005, we sold two such properties for a gain of $4.6 million compared to one property in the first quarter of 2004 for a gain of $382,000.
During the first quarter of 2005, we recognized $2.7 million of a deferred gain associated with the sale of our landscaping operations in 2001. The gain was deferred as a result of future performance provisions contained in the original sale agreement. As a result of contract renegotiations effective in the first quarter of 2005, all future performance provisions were removed and the gain was recognized.
General and Administrative Expense
General and administrative expenses decreased from $8.3 million to $7.6 million for the three months ended March 31, 2004, compared to the same period in 2005. General and administrative expenses are comprised of two components. The first is direct expenses that are not attributable to specific assets such as legal fees, external audit fees, marketing costs, investor relation expenses and other corporate overhead. The second component is the unallocated overhead costs associated with the operation of our owned properties and Service Operations, including construction, leasing and maintenance operations. Those overhead costs not allocated to these operations are charged to general and administrative expenses. The overall decrease in general and administrative expenses is primarily the result of an increase in levels of construction for the first quarter of 2005, resulting in more overhead costs applied to projects versus expensed in general and administrative expenses.
20
Other Income and Expenses
Earnings from sale of land, net of impairment adjustments, are comprised of the following amounts for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively (in thousands):
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
||
Gain on land sales |
|
$ |
177 |
|
$ |
4,729 |
|
Impairment adjustment for land |
|
(34 |
) |
(100 |
) |
||
Total |
|
$ |
143 |
|
$ |
4,629 |
|
Gain on land sales are derived from sales of undeveloped land owned by us. Gains from land sales decreased $4.6 million from the first quarter of 2004 compared to the first quarter of 2005. In the first quarter of 2004, we sold six parcels of land versus only one parcel in the first quarter of 2005. We pursue opportunities to dispose of land in markets with a high concentration of undeveloped land and those markets where the land no longer meets our strategic development plans.
We recorded a $34,000 impairment charge in the first quarter of 2005 and $100,000 for the same period in 2004 associated with the contracted sale of land parcels. The land parcel with the $100,000 impairment was later sold in 2004 and the land parcel with the $34,000 impairment is scheduled to be sold later in 2005.
Discontinued Operations
We have classified the operations of 50 buildings as discontinued operations as of March 31, 2005. These 50 buildings consist of 41 industrial, six office and three retail properties. As a result, we classified net income from operations of $401,000 and $1.0 million as net income from discontinued operations for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively. In addition, two of the properties classified in discontinued operations were sold during the first quarter of 2005 and 41 properties were sold during 2004. The gains on disposal of these properties, net of impairment adjustments of $3.7 million and $4.0 million for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively, are also reported in discontinued operations.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Sources of Liquidity
We expect to meet our short-term liquidity requirements over the next twelve months, including payments of dividends and distributions as well as recurring capital expenditures relating to maintaining our current real estate assets, primarily through the following:
working capital; and
net cash provided by operating activities.
Although we historically have not used any other sources of funds to pay for recurring capital expenditures on our current real estate investments, the use of borrowings or property disposition proceeds may be temporarily needed to fund such expenditures during periods of high leasing volume.
We expect to meet long-term liquidity requirements, such as scheduled mortgage debt maturities, refinancing of long-term debt, preferred share redemptions, the retirement of unsecured notes and amounts outstanding under the unsecured credit facility, property acquisitions, financing of development activities and other non-recurring capital improvements, primarily through the following sources:
issuance of additional unsecured notes;
issuance of additional General Partner preferred equity;
undistributed cash provided by operating activities, if any; and
proceeds received from real estate dispositions.
21
We believe that our principal source of liquidity, cash flows from Rental Operations, provides a stable source of cash to fund operational expenses. We believe that this cash-based revenue stream is substantially aligned with revenue recognition (except for periodic straight-line rental income accruals and amortization of above or below market rents) as cash receipts from the leasing of rental properties are generally received in advance of or in a short time following the actual revenue recognition. We are subject to risks of decreased occupancy through market conditions as well as tenant defaults and bankruptcies, and potential reduction in rental rates upon renewal or re-letting of properties, which would result in reduced cash flow from operations. However, we believe that these risks are mitigated by our strong market presence in most of our locations and the fact that we perform in-house credit review and analysis on major tenants and all significant leases before they are executed.
Credit Facilities
We have one unsecured line of credit available at March 31, 2005, described as follows (in thousands):
|
|
Borrowing |
|
Maturity |
|
Interest |
|
Outstanding Balance |
|
||
Description |
|
Capacity |
|
Date |
|
Rate |
|
at March 31, 2005 |
|
||
Unsecured Line of Credit |
|
$ |
500,000 |
|
January 2007 |
|
LIBOR + .60 |
% |
$ |
272,000 |
|
The line of credit is used to fund development activities, acquire additional rental properties and provide working capital.
The line of credit provides us with an option to obtain borrowings from financial institutions that participate in the line at rates lower than the stated interest rate, subject to certain restrictions. Amounts outstanding on the unsecured line of credit at March 31, 2005, range from LIBOR + .19% to .60% (3.00% to 3.45% at March 31, 2005).
The line of credit also contains financial covenants that require us to meet defined levels of performance. As of March 31, 2005, we are in compliance with all covenants and expect to remain in compliance for the foreseeable future.
Debt and Equity Securities
At March 31, 2005, we have on file with the SEC an effective shelf registration statement that permits us to sell up to an additional $795.0 million of unsecured debt securities. In addition, the General Partner has on file with the SEC an effective shelf registration statement that permits the General Partner to sell up to an additional $350.7 million of common and preferred stock as of March 31, 2005. From time-to-time, we expect to issue additional securities under these registration statements to fund development and acquisition of additional rental properties and to fund the repayment of the credit facilities and other long-term debt upon maturity.
The indenture governing our unsecured notes also requires us to comply with financial ratios and other covenants regarding our operations. We are currently in compliance with all such covenants as of March 31, 2005 and expect to remain in compliance for the foreseeable future.
Sale of Real Estate Assets
We utilize sales of real estate assets as an additional source of liquidity. We pursue opportunities to sell real estate assets and prune our older portfolio properties when beneficial to our long-term strategy.
22
Uses of Liquidity
Our principal uses of liquidity include the following:
Property investments;
Recurring leasing/capital costs;
Distributions to unitholders;
Long-term debt maturities; and
Other contractual obligations.
Property Investment
We evaluate development and acquisition opportunities based upon market outlook, supply and long-term growth potential.
Recurring Expenditures
One of our principal uses of our liquidity is to fund the development, acquisition and recurring leasing/capital expenditures of our real estate investments.
A summary of our recurring capital expenditures for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively, is as follows (in thousands):
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
||
Tenant improvements |
|
$ |
13,732 |
|
$ |
14,244 |
|
Leasing costs |
|
8,811 |
|
6,652 |
|
||
Building improvements |
|
2,446 |
|
4,555 |
|
||
Totals |
|
$ |
24,989 |
|
$ |
25,451 |
|
Debt Maturities
Debt outstanding at March 31, 2005, totaled $2.6 billion with a weighted average interest rate of 5.53% maturing at various dates through 2028. We had $2.2 billion of unsecured debt and approximately $201 million of secured debt outstanding at March 31, 2005. Scheduled principal amortization of such debt totaled $1.7 million for the three months ended March 31, 2005.
Following is a summary of the scheduled future amortization and maturities of our indebtedness at March 31, 2005 (in thousands, except percentage data):
|
|
Future Repayments |
|
Weighted Average |
|
|||||||
|
|
Scheduled |
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Rate of |
|
|||
Year |
|
Amortization |
|
Maturities |
|
Total |
|
Future Repayments |
|
|||
2005 |
|
$ |
6,734 |
|
$ |
105,979 |
|
$ |
112,713 |
|
7.39 |
% |
2006 |
|
8,318 |
|
415,186 |
|
423,504 |
|
4.62 |
% |
|||
2007 |
|
6,891 |
|
486,615 |
|
493,506 |
|
4.29 |
% |
|||
2008 |
|
6,031 |
|
259,028 |
|
265,059 |
|
4.52 |
% |
|||
2009 |
|
5,867 |
|
275,000 |
|
280,867 |
|
7.37 |
% |
|||
2010 |
|
5,313 |
|
175,000 |
|
180,313 |
|
5.39 |
% |
|||
2011 |
|
4,647 |
|
175,000 |
|
179,647 |
|
6.94 |
% |
|||
2012 |
|
3,332 |
|
200,000 |
|
203,332 |
|
5.86 |
% |
|||
2013 |
|
3,050 |
|
150,000 |
|
153,050 |
|
4.64 |
% |
|||
2014 |
|
3,800 |
|
273,197 |
|
276,997 |
|
6.23 |
% |
|||
Thereafter |
|
4,765 |
|
50,000 |
|
54,765 |
|
7.01 |
% |
|||
|
|
$ |
58,748 |
|
$ |
2,565,005 |
|
$ |
2,623,753 |
|
5.53 |
% |
23
Historical Cash Flows
Cash and cash equivalents were $3.7 million and $11.9 million at March 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively. The following highlights significant changes in net cash, associated with our operating, investing and financing activities (in millions):
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
||||
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
||
Net Cash Provided by |
|
$ |
65.0 |
|
$ |
69.6 |
|
Net Cash Used for |
|
$ |
(88.4 |
) |
$ |
(107.4 |
) |
Net Cash Provided by |
|
$ |
20.9 |
|
$ |
35.0 |
|
Operating Activities
Cash flows from operating activities provide the cash necessary to meet normal operational requirements of our rental operations and merchant building activities. The receipt of rental income from rental operations continues to provide the primary source of our revenues and operating cash flows. In addition, we also develop buildings with the intent to sell, which provides another significant source of operating cash flow activity.
During the period ended March 31, 2005, we incurred merchant building development costs of $13.6 million compared to $8.8 million for the period ended March 31, 2004. The difference is reflective of the timing of activity in our held-for-sale pipeline. The pipeline of held-for-sale projects under construction as of March 31, 2005, has anticipated costs of $28.4 million. In addition to the development costs noted above, we also acquired a building for $6.0 million during the first quarter of 2005 on which we intend to make minor improvements and sell later in 2005.
We sold two merchant buildings in the first quarter of 2005 compared to one sale of a merchant building for the same period in 2004, for net after tax gains of $4.6 million and $382,000, respectively.
Investing Activities
Investing activities are one of the primary uses of our liquidity. Development and acquisition activities typically generate additional rental revenues and provide cash flows for operational requirements. Highlights of significant cash uses are as follows:
Development costs increased to $29.7 million for the period March 31, 2005 from $22.1 million for the same period in 2004.
During the first quarter of 2005, we increased our acquisition of land held for development. We acquired $34.5 million of land in the first quarter of 2005. The significant increase is primarily attributable to the acquisition of over 40 acres of land at a cost of over $23 million in our South Florida market. This acquisition is associated with a retail development we are planning for this market.
Sales of land and depreciated property provided $13.6 million in net proceeds for the period ended March 31, 2005, compared to $29.4 million for the same period in 2004. Sales of non-strategic and older properties will continue to be utilized as part of our capital recycling program to fund acquisitions and new development while improving the overall quality of our investment portfolio.
24
Financing Activities
The following significant items highlight fluctuations in net cash provided by financing activities:
In January 2005, we retired a $65.0 million variable rate term loan.
In March 2005, we retired $100.0 million of 6.94% senior unsecured debt that matured in March 2005.
During the first quarter of 2005, we had net borrowings on our $500.0 million line of credit of $272.0 million. These borrowings were used to retire the above-mentioned debt and to support operations.
Financial Instruments
We are exposed to capital market risk, such as changes in interest rates. In order to manage the volatility relating to interest rate risk, we may enter into interest rate hedging arrangements from time to time. We do not utilize derivative financial instruments for trading or speculative purposes. We account for derivative instruments under Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities as amended (SFAS 133).
In March 2005, we entered into $300.0 million of cash flow hedges through forward-starting interest rate swaps to hedge interest rates on $300.0 million of estimated debt offerings in 2006. The swaps qualify for hedge accounting under SFAS 133 with any changes in fair value recorded in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (OCI). Due to the decline in rates, the fair value at the end of the first quarter is a liability of $1.8 million
In May 2003, the FASB issued SFAS No. 150, Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Characteristics of both Liabilities and Equity (SFAS 150). SFAS 150 establishes standards for classifying and measuring as liabilities certain financial instruments that embody obligations of the issuer and have characteristics of both liabilities and equity. SFAS 150 is effective for all financial instruments created or modified after May 31, 2003, and otherwise is effective July 1, 2003. We include the operations of one joint venture in our condensed consolidated financial statements at March 31, 2005. This joint venture is partially owned by unaffiliated parties that have non-controlling interests. SFAS 150 requires the disclosure of the estimated settlement value of these non-controlling interests. As of March 31, 2005, the estimated settlement value of the non-controlling interest in this consolidated joint venture was approximately $1.1 million as compared to the receivable asset recorded on our books for this joint venture of $105,000.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In December 2004, FASB issued SFAS No. 123 (R), Share-Based Payment, which is a revision of SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock Based Compensation. In April 2005, the SEC delayed the effective date on SFAS No. 123 (R) from July 2005 to January 2006. We are currently evaluating the impact on our financial position and results of operations, but do not believe that the adoption of SFAS 123 (R) will have a material impact on our financial statements.
Investments in Unconsolidated Companies
We analyze our investments in joint ventures under Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Interpretation No. 46(R) (FIN 46(R)), Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities, to determine if the joint venture is a variable interest entity and would require consolidation. As of March 31, 2005, none of our joint ventures qualified as a variable interest entity under FIN 46(R). To the extent that our joint ventures do not qualify as variable interest entities, we further assess under the guidelines of SOP 78-9, ARB 51 and FASB 94 to determine if the venture should be consolidated. We have equity interests in unconsolidated
25
partnerships and joint ventures that own and operate rental properties and hold land for development. The equity method of accounting is used for these investments in which we have the ability to exercise significant influence, but not control, over operating and financial policies. As a result, the assets and liabilities of these joint ventures are not included on our balance sheet. Our investment in unconsolidated companies represents less than 5% of our total assets as of March 31, 2005. These investments provide several benefits to us, including increased market share and an additional source of capital to fund real estate projects.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure About Market Risk
We are exposed to interest rate changes primarily as a result of our line of credit and long-term debt used to maintain liquidity and fund capital expenditures and expansion of our real estate investment portfolio and operations. Our interest rate risk management objective is to limit the impact of interest rate changes on earnings and cash flows and to lower our overall borrowing costs. To achieve our objectives, we borrow primarily at fixed rates and may enter into derivative financial instruments such as interest rate swaps, caps and treasury locks in order to mitigate our interest rate risk on a related financial instrument. We do not enter into derivative or interest rate transactions for speculative purposes. For a discussion of the market risk with respect to our outstanding cash flow hedges, see Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations Liquidity and Capital Resources Financial Instruments.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
(a) Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures
We maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in annual and periodic reports filed with the SEC is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SECs rules and forms. These disclosure controls and procedures are further designed to ensure that such information is accumulated and communicated to management, including the chief executive officer and the chief financial officer to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
(b) Changes in internal control over financial reporting
Based on the most recent evaluation, which was completed as of March 31, 2005, the chief executive officer and chief financial officer believe that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective. There have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the period covered by this report that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
None
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
On March 1, 2005, DMI merged into the Partnership. At the effective time of the merger, our General Partner issued an aggregate of 501,349 shares of our common stock in exchange for an equal amount of DRLP partnership units to John W. Wynne, Thomas L. Hefner, Darell E. Zink, Jr., Daniel C. Staton, Gary A. Burk, David R. Mennel and Michael Coletta, who were former shareholders of DMI. The shares were privately issued pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933. Each of the persons who acquired shares in the merger is an accredited investor. We exercised reasonable care to assure that these persons were not purchasing the shares with a view to their distribution. For more details regarding this transaction, see our Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on January 4, 2005.
26
Item 3. Defaults upon Senior Securities
None
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
None
None
(a) Exhibits
|
Duke Realty Corporation 2005 Long-Term Incentive Plan (incorporated herein by reference to Appendix A of the General Partners Definitive Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A (File No. 001-09044) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 15, 2005) |
|
|
|
|
Exhibit 10.2 |
|
Duke Realty Corporation Shareholder Value Plan, a subplan of the 2005 Long-Term Incentive Plan (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 99.2 of the General Partners Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 3, 2005). |
|
|
|
Exhibit 10.3 |
|
Duke Realty Corporation Non-Employee Directors Compensation Plan, a subplan of the 2005 Long-Term Incentive Plan (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 99.3 of the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 3, 2005). |
|
|
|
Exhibit 10.4 |
|
Form of 2005 Long-Term Incentive Plan Stock Option Award Certificate (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 99.4 of the General Partners Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 3, 2005). |
|
|
|
Exhibit 10.5 |
|
Form of 2005 Long-Term Incentive Plan Award Certificate for Restricted Stock Units and Shareholder Value Plan Awards (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 99.5 of the General Partners Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 3, 2005). |
|
|
|
Exhibit 10.6 |
|
Form of 2005 Long-Term Incentive Plan Restricted Stock Unit Award Certificate for Non-Employee Directors (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 99.6 of the General Partners Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 3, 2005). |
|
|
|
Exhibit 10.7 |
|
Amendments to Previously Existing Long-Term Incentive Plans (incorporated herein by reference to Appendix B of the General Partners Definitive Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A (File No. 001-09044) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 15, 2005). |
|
|
|
Exhibit 11.1 |
|
Ratio of Earnings to Combined Fixed Charges and Preferred Stock Dividends. |
|
|
|
Exhibit 11.2 |
|
Ratio of Earnings to Debt Service. |
|
|
|
27
Exhibit 15 |
|
Letter regarding unaudited interim financial information. |
|
|
|
Exhibit 31.1 |
|
Rule 13a-14(a) Certification of the General Partners Chief Executive Officer. |
|
|
|
Exhibit 31.2 |
|
Rule 13a-14(a) Certification of the General Partners Chief Financial Officer. |
|
|
|
Exhibit 32.1 |
|
Section 1350 Certification of the General Partners Chief Executive Officer. |
|
|
|
Exhibit 32.2 |
|
Section 1350 Certification of the General Partners Chief Financial Officer. |
28
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
DUKE REALTY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP |
|
|
By: |
DUKE REALTY CORPORATION |
|
|
Its General Partner |
|
|
|
Date: May 16, 2005 |
|
/s/ DENNIS D. OKLAK |
|
|
Dennis D. Oklak |
|
|
Chairman and Chief Executive
Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ MATTHEW A. COHOAT |
|
|
Matthew A. Cohoat |
|
|
Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer |
29