UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-Q
(MARK ONE)
ý QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 2005
OR
o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
FOR THE TRANSITION PERIOD FROM TO
COMMISSION FILE NUMBER: 1-7935
International Rectifier Corporation
(EXACT NAME OF REGISTRANT AS SPECIFIED IN ITS CHARTER)
DELAWARE |
|
95-1528961 |
(STATE OR OTHER
JURISDICTION OF |
|
(IRS EMPLOYER
IDENTIFICATION |
|
|
|
233 KANSAS STREET |
|
|
EL SEGUNDO, CALIFORNIA |
|
90245 |
(ADDRESS OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICES) |
|
(ZIP CODE) |
REGISTRANTS TELEPHONE NUMBER, INCLUDING AREA CODE: (310) 726-8000
INDICATE BY CHECK MARK WHETHER THE REGISTRANT (1) HAS FILED ALL REPORTS REQUIRED TO BE FILED BY SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 DURING THE PRECEDING 12 MONTHS (OR FOR SUCH SHORTER PERIOD THAT THE REGISTRANT WAS REQUIRED TO FILE SUCH REPORTS), AND (2) HAS BEEN SUBJECT TO SUCH FILING REQUIREMENTS FOR THE PAST 90 DAYS. YES ý NO o
INDICATE BY CHECK MARK WHETHER THE REGISTRANT IS AN ACCELERATED FILER (AS DEFINED IN RULE 12b-2 OF THE EXCHANGE ACT). YES ý NO o
THERE WERE 64,483,988 SHARES OF THE REGISTRANTS COMMON STOCK, PAR VALUE $1.00 PER SHARE, OUTSTANDING ON MAY 11, 2005.
Table of Contents
2
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. Financial Statements.
INTERNATIONAL RECTIFIER CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME
(In thousands except per share amounts)
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
||||||||
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Revenues |
|
$ |
281,871 |
|
$ |
275,411 |
|
$ |
892,656 |
|
$ |
761,854 |
|
Cost of sales |
|
156,604 |
|
166,236 |
|
504,571 |
|
473,653 |
|
||||
Gross profit |
|
125,267 |
|
109,175 |
|
388,085 |
|
288,201 |
|
||||
Selling and administrative expense |
|
40,756 |
|
43,005 |
|
128,034 |
|
117,717 |
|
||||
Research and development expense |
|
27,323 |
|
24,221 |
|
80,379 |
|
67,274 |
|
||||
Amortization of acquisition-related intangible assets |
|
1,473 |
|
1,421 |
|
4,369 |
|
4,218 |
|
||||
Impairment of assets, restructuring and severance charges |
|
8,077 |
|
9,907 |
|
21,599 |
|
24,026 |
|
||||
Other income (expense), net |
|
169 |
) |
(6,174 |
) |
825 |
|
(5,647 |
) |
||||
Interest (income) expense, net |
|
(638 |
) |
1,512 |
|
1,728 |
|
1,095 |
|
||||
Income before income taxes |
|
48,107 |
|
35,283 |
|
151,151 |
|
79,518 |
|
||||
Provision for income taxes |
|
12,434 |
|
8,538 |
|
38,384 |
|
19,155 |
|
||||
Net income |
|
$ |
35,673 |
|
$ |
26,745 |
|
$ |
112,767 |
|
$ |
60,363 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Net income per common share basic |
|
$ |
0.53 |
|
$ |
0.41 |
|
$ |
1.68 |
|
$ |
0.93 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Net income per common share diluted |
|
$ |
0.48 |
|
$ |
0.39 |
|
$ |
1.55 |
|
$ |
0.89 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Average common shares outstanding basic |
|
67,795 |
|
65,826 |
|
67,080 |
|
65,166 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Average common shares and potentially dilutive securities outstanding - diluted |
|
77,322 |
|
69,132 |
|
76,559 |
|
68,184 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of this statement.
3
INTERNATIONAL RECTIFIER CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(In thousands)
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
||||||||
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Net income |
|
$ |
35,673 |
|
$ |
26,745 |
|
$ |
112,767 |
|
$ |
60,363 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Other comprehensive income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Foreign currency translation adjustments |
|
(9,421 |
) |
10,435 |
|
14,124 |
|
29,840 |
|
||||
Unrealized gains (losses) on securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Unrealized holding gains (losses) on available-for-sale securities, net of tax effect of ($465), ($2,902), $6,780 and ($11,891), respectively |
|
794 |
|
4,944 |
|
(11,544 |
) |
20,249 |
|
||||
Unrealized holding gains (losses) on foreign currency forward contract, net of tax effect of ($1,061), $425, $185 and $4,054, respectively |
|
1,807 |
|
(723 |
) |
(315 |
) |
(6,902 |
) |
||||
Less: Reclassification adjustments of net losses on available-for-sale securities and foreign currency forward contract |
|
57 |
|
(7,855 |
) |
609 |
|
(7,709 |
) |
||||
Other comprehensive income, net |
|
(6,763 |
) |
6,801 |
|
2,874 |
|
35,478 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Comprehensive income |
|
$ |
28,910 |
|
$ |
33,546 |
|
$ |
115,641 |
|
$ |
95,841 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of this statement.
4
INTERNATIONAL RECTIFIER CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET
(In thousands)
|
|
March 31, |
|
June 30, |
|
||
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
||
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
312,039 |
|
$ |
339,024 |
|
Short-term cash investments |
|
244,036 |
|
221,130 |
|
||
Trade accounts receivable, net |
|
167,030 |
|
154,911 |
|
||
Inventories |
|
171,748 |
|
159,908 |
|
||
Deferred income taxes |
|
48,447 |
|
44,141 |
|
||
Prepaid expenses and other receivables |
|
67,379 |
|
34,096 |
|
||
Total current assets |
|
1,010,679 |
|
953,210 |
|
||
Long-term cash investments |
|
296,341 |
|
276,055 |
|
||
Property, plant and equipment, net |
|
477,767 |
|
393,919 |
|
||
Goodwill |
|
156,643 |
|
139,919 |
|
||
Acquisition-related intangible assets, net |
|
37,172 |
|
28,605 |
|
||
Long-term deferred income taxes |
|
78,340 |
|
74,366 |
|
||
Other assets |
|
115,988 |
|
150,932 |
|
||
Total assets |
|
$ |
2,172,930 |
|
$ |
2,017,006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Bank loans |
|
$ |
20,003 |
|
$ |
18,866 |
|
Long-term debt, due within one year |
|
224 |
|
274 |
|
||
Accounts payable |
|
73,175 |
|
78,164 |
|
||
Accrued salaries, wages and commissions |
|
27,382 |
|
36,510 |
|
||
Other accrued expenses |
|
104,705 |
|
81,222 |
|
||
Total current liabilities |
|
225,489 |
|
215,036 |
|
||
Long-term debt, less current maturities |
|
547,128 |
|
560,019 |
|
||
Other long-term liabilities |
|
33,214 |
|
22,950 |
|
||
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
|
14,789 |
|
||
Stockholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Common stock |
|
68,109 |
|
66,358 |
|
||
Capital contributed in excess of par value of shares |
|
802,664 |
|
757,169 |
|
||
Retained earnings |
|
410,452 |
|
297,685 |
|
||
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
|
85,874 |
|
83,000 |
|
||
Total stockholders equity |
|
1,367,099 |
|
1,204,212 |
|
||
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
2,172,930 |
|
$ |
2,017,006 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of this statement.
5
INTERNATIONAL RECTIFIER CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands)
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
||||
|
|
March 31, |
|
||||
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Cash flow from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Net income |
|
$ |
112,767 |
|
$ |
60,363 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Depreciation and amortization |
|
51,852 |
|
41,870 |
|
||
Amortization of acquisition-related intangible assets |
|
4,369 |
|
4,218 |
|
||
Unrealized gains on swap transactions |
|
(1,176 |
) |
(519 |
) |
||
Deferred income taxes |
|
(15,106 |
) |
2,147 |
|
||
Tax benefit from options exercised |
|
11,405 |
|
12,215 |
|
||
Change in operating assets and liabilities, net |
|
(21,852 |
) |
(37,102 |
) |
||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
142,259 |
|
83,192 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Cash flow from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Additions to property, plant and equipment |
|
(98,745 |
) |
(52,153 |
) |
||
Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment |
|
265 |
|
420 |
|
||
Acquisition of business |
|
(39,633 |
) |
|
|
||
Acquisition of technologies |
|
(11,500 |
) |
|
|
||
Sale or maturities of cash investments |
|
332,131 |
|
478,855 |
|
||
Purchase of cash investments |
|
(375,889 |
) |
(502,713 |
) |
||
Change in other investing activities, net |
|
(12,907 |
) |
960 |
|
||
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
(206,278 |
) |
(74,631 |
) |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Cash flow from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Proceeds from short-term debt, net |
|
49 |
|
1,926 |
|
||
Repayments of long-term debt |
|
|
|
(118 |
) |
||
Repayments of capital lease obligations, net |
|
(172 |
) |
(776 |
) |
||
Proceeds from exercise of stock options and stock purchase plan |
|
35,842 |
|
40,319 |
|
||
Other, net |
|
(1,193 |
) |
(280 |
) |
||
Net cash provided by financing activities |
|
34,526 |
|
41,071 |
|
||
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents |
|
2,508 |
|
(3,257 |
) |
||
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents |
|
(26,985 |
) |
46,375 |
|
||
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period |
|
339,024 |
|
216,823 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period |
|
$ |
312,039 |
|
$ |
263,198 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of this statement.
6
INTERNATIONAL RECTIFIER CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
March 31, 2005
1. Basis of Consolidation
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of International Rectifier Corporation and its subsidiaries (the Company), which are located in North America, Europe and Asia. Intercompany transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
The consolidated financial statements included herein are unaudited; however, they contain all normal recurring adjustments which, in the opinion of the Companys management, are necessary to state fairly the consolidated financial position of the Company at March 31, 2005, and the consolidated results of operations for the three and nine months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, and the consolidated cash flows for the nine months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004. The results of operations for the three and nine months ended March 31, 2005 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year.
The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2004.
The Company operates on a 52-53 week fiscal year under which the three months ended March 2005 and 2004 consisted of 13 weeks ending April 3, 2005 and April 4, 2004, respectively. For ease of presenting the accompanying consolidated financial statements, fiscal quarter-end and fiscal year-end is shown as March 31 and June 30, respectively, for all periods presented. Fiscal 2005 will consist of 52 weeks ending July 3, 2005.
Certain reclassifications have been made to the June 30, 2004 cash equivalent and short-term cash investment balances. Previously, the Companys investments in auction rate preferred securities were recorded in cash and cash equivalents rather than short-term cash investments. The Company reclassified auction rate securities from cash and cash equivalents to short-term investments because the underlying instruments have maturity dates exceeding ninety days. As of March 31, 2005, the Company had no investments in these securities. As a result of the reclassifications, the Companys consolidated balance sheet and cash flows from investing activities were affected as follows:
cash and cash equivalents decreased and short-term cash investments increased by $100.6 million as of June 30, 2004;
net cash used for the purchase of cash investments increased by $67.4 million for the nine months ended March 31, 2004; and
net change in cash and cash equivalents decreased by $67.4 million for the nine months ended March 31, 2004.
7
The reclassifications had no impact on the Companys total current assets, stockholders equity, cash flows provided by operating activities or total consolidated results reported in any period presented.
2. Net Income Per Common Share
Net income per common share - basic is computed by dividing net income available to common stockholders (the numerator) by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding (the denominator) during the period. The computation of net income per common share - diluted is similar to the computation of net income per common share - basic except that the denominator is increased to include the number of additional common shares that would have been outstanding for the exercise of stock options using the treasury stock method and the conversion of the Companys convertible subordinated notes using the if-converted method. The Companys use of the treasury stock method reduces the gross number of dilutive shares by the number of shares purchasable from the proceeds of the options assumed to be exercised. The Companys use of the if-converted method increases reported net income by the interest expense related to the convertible subordinated notes when computing net income per common share diluted.
The following table provides a reconciliation of the numerator and denominator of the basic and diluted per-share computations for the three and nine months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004 (in thousands except per share amounts):
|
|
Net Income |
|
Shares |
|
Per Share |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Three months ended March 31, 2005: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Net income per common share basic |
|
$ |
35,673 |
|
67,795 |
|
$ |
0.53 |
|
||
Effect of dilutive securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Stock options |
|
|
|
2,088 |
|
(0.02 |
) |
||||
Conversion of subordinated notes |
|
1,552 |
|
7,439 |
|
(0.03 |
) |
||||
Net income per common share diluted |
|
$ |
37,225 |
|
77,322 |
|
$ |
0.48 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Three months ended March 31, 2004: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Net income per common share basic |
|
$ |
26,745 |
|
65,826 |
|
$ |
0.41 |
|
||
Effect of dilutive securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Stock options |
|
|
|
3,306 |
|
(0.02 |
) |
||||
Net income per common share diluted |
|
$ |
26,745 |
|
69,132 |
|
$ |
0.39 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Nine months ended March 31, 2005: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Net income per common share basic |
|
$ |
112,767 |
|
67,080 |
|
$ |
1.68 |
|
||
Effect of dilutive securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Stock options |
|
|
|
2,040 |
|
(0.05 |
) |
||||
Conversion of subordinated notes |
|
6,250 |
|
7,439 |
|
(0.08 |
) |
||||
Net income per common share diluted |
|
$ |
119,017 |
|
76,559 |
|
$ |
1.55 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Nine months ended March 31, 2004: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Net income per common share basic |
|
$ |
60,363 |
|
65,166 |
|
$ |
0.93 |
|
||
Effect of dilutive securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Stock options |
|
|
|
3,018 |
|
(0.04 |
) |
||||
Net income per common share diluted |
|
$ |
60,363 |
|
68,184 |
|
$ |
0.89 |
|
||
8
The conversion effect of the Companys outstanding convertible subordinated notes into 7,439,000 shares of common stock was not included in the computation of diluted income per share for the three and nine months ended March 31, 2004, since such effect would have been anti-dilutive.
3. Cash and Investments
The Company classifies all highly liquid investments purchased with original or remaining maturities of ninety days or less at the date of purchase as cash equivalents. The cost of these investments approximates fair value. As indicated in Note 1, Basis of Consolidation, certain reclassifications have been made to the June 30, 2004 cash equivalent and short-term cash investment balances. Previously, the Companys investments in auction rate preferred securities were recorded in cash and cash equivalents rather than short-term cash investments. Auction rate securities are securities with an underlying component of a long-term debt or an equity instrument. These auction rate securities trade or mature on a shorter term than the underlying instrument based on an auction bid that resets the interest rate of the security. The auction or reset dates occur at intervals that are typically less than three months, providing high liquidity to otherwise longer term investments. As of March 31, 2005, the Company had no investments in these securities.
The Company invests excess cash in marketable securities consisting primarily of commercial paper, corporate notes, corporate bonds and U.S. government securities. At March 31, 2005 and June 30, 2004, all of the Companys marketable securities are classified as available-for-sale. In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 115, Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities, unrealized gains and losses on these investments are included in other comprehensive income, a separate component of stockholders equity, net of any related tax effect. Realized gains and losses and declines in value considered to be other than temporary are included in interest income and expense. As of March 31, 2005 and June 30, 2004, no investment was in a material loss position for greater than one year.
9
Cash, cash equivalents and cash investments as of March 31, 2005 and June 30, 2004 are summarized as follows (in thousands):
|
|
March 31, |
|
June 30, |
|
||
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
||
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
312,039 |
|
$ |
339,024 |
|
Short-term cash investments |
|
244,036 |
|
221,130 |
|
||
Long-term cash investments |
|
296,341 |
|
276,055 |
|
||
Total cash, cash equivalents and cash investments |
|
$ |
852,416 |
|
$ |
836,209 |
|
Available-for-sale securities as of March 31, 2005 are summarized as follows (in thousands):
Short-Term Cash Investments:
|
|
Amortized |
|
Gross |
|
Gross |
|
Net |
|
Market |
|
|||||
Corporate debt |
|
$ |
153,754 |
|
$ |
1 |
|
$ |
(1,570 |
) |
$ |
(1,569 |
) |
$ |
152,185 |
|
U.S. government and agency obligations |
|
86,718 |
|
|
|
(629 |
) |
(629 |
) |
86,089 |
|
|||||
Other debt |
|
5,764 |
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
(2 |
) |
5,762 |
|
|||||
Total short-term cash investments |
|
$ |
246,236 |
|
$ |
1 |
|
$ |
(2,201 |
) |
$ |
(2,200 |
) |
$ |
244,036 |
|
Long-Term Cash Investments:
|
|
Amortized |
|
Gross |
|
Gross |
|
Net |
|
Market |
|
|||||
Corporate debt |
|
$ |
136,089 |
|
$ |
198 |
|
$ |
(963 |
) |
$ |
(765 |
) |
$ |
135,324 |
|
U.S. government and agency obligations |
|
80,487 |
|
157 |
|
(238 |
) |
(81 |
) |
80,406 |
|
|||||
Other debt |
|
80,748 |
|
44 |
|
(181 |
) |
(137 |
) |
80,611 |
|
|||||
Total long-term cash investments |
|
$ |
297,324 |
|
$ |
399 |
|
$ |
(1,382 |
) |
$ |
(983 |
) |
$ |
296,341 |
|
10
Available-for-sale securities as of June 30, 2004 are summarized as follows (in thousands):
Short-Term Cash Investments:
|
|
Amortized |
|
Gross |
|
Gross |
|
Net |
|
Market |
|
|||||
Corporate auction rate preferred securities |
|
$ |
100,600 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
100,600 |
|
Corporate debt |
|
81,960 |
|
5 |
|
(299 |
) |
(294 |
) |
81,666 |
|
|||||
U.S. government and agency obligations |
|
21,639 |
|
2 |
|
(48 |
) |
(46 |
) |
21,593 |
|
|||||
Other debt |
|
17,282 |
|
|
|
(11 |
) |
(11 |
) |
17,271 |
|
|||||
Total short-term cash investments |
|
$ |
221,481 |
|
$ |
7 |
|
$ |
(358 |
) |
$ |
(351 |
) |
$ |
221,130 |
|
Long-Term Cash Investments:
|
|
Amortized |
|
Gross |
|
Gross |
|
Net |
|
Market |
|
|||||
Corporate debt |
|
$ |
159,280 |
|
$ |
33 |
|
$ |
(1,689 |
) |
$ |
(1,656 |
) |
$ |
157,624 |
|
U.S. government and agency obligations |
|
87,420 |
|
9 |
|
(517 |
) |
(508 |
) |
86,912 |
|
|||||
Other debt |
|
31,798 |
|
21 |
|
(300 |
) |
(279 |
) |
31,519 |
|
|||||
Total long-term cash investments |
|
$ |
278,498 |
|
$ |
63 |
|
$ |
(2,506 |
) |
$ |
(2,443 |
) |
$ |
276,055 |
|
The Company holds as strategic investments the common stock of two publicly-traded Japanese companies, one of which is Nihon Inter Electronics Corporation (Nihon), a related party as further disclosed in Note 15. The Company accounts for these available-for-sale investments under SFAS No. 115. These stocks are traded on the Tokyo Stock Exchange. The market values of the equity investments at March 31, 2005 and June 30, 2004 were $76.4 million and $94.1 million, respectively, and were included in other long-term assets. Mark-to-market gains (losses), net of tax, of $1.1 million and $4.0 million for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively, and ($11.1) million and $21.7 million for the nine months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively, were included in other comprehensive income, a separate component of equity.
The amortized cost and estimated fair value of cash investments at March 31, 2005, by contractual maturity, are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
Amortized |
|
Estimated Fair |
|
||
Due in 1 year or less |
|
$ |
246,236 |
|
$ |
244,036 |
|
Due in 1-2 years |
|
135,805 |
|
134,711 |
|
||
Due in 2-5 years |
|
122,529 |
|
122,641 |
|
||
Due after 5 years |
|
38,990 |
|
38,989 |
|
||
Total cash investments |
|
$ |
543,560 |
|
$ |
540,377 |
|
11
In accordance with the Companys investment policy which limits the length of time that cash may be invested, the expected disposal dates may be less than the contractual maturity dates as indicated in the table above.
Gross realized gains were $0.01 million and $0.03 million for the three and nine months ended March 31, 2005, respectively, and gross realized losses were ($0.2) million and ($0.3) million for the three and nine months ended March 31, 2005, respectively. Gross realized gains were $0.5 million and $2.6 million for the three and nine months ended March 31, 2004, respectively, and gross realized losses were ($0.1) million and ($0.2) million for the three and nine months ended March 31, 2004, respectively. The cost of marketable securities sold is determined by the weighted average cost method.
4. Derivative Financial Instruments
Foreign Currency Risk
The Company conducts business on a global basis in several foreign currencies, and at various times, is exposed to fluctuations with the British Pound Sterling, the Euro and the Japanese Yen. The Companys risk to the European currencies is partially offset by the natural hedge of manufacturing and selling goods in the European currencies. Considering its specific foreign currency exposures, the Company has the greatest exposure to the Japanese Yen, since it has significant Yen-based revenues without Yen-based manufacturing costs. The Company has established a foreign currency hedging program using foreign exchange forward contracts, including the Forward Contract described below, to hedge certain foreign currency transaction exposures. To protect against reductions in value and volatility of future cash flows caused by changes in currency exchange rates, the Company has established revenue, expense and balance sheet hedging programs. Currency forward contracts and local Yen and Euro borrowings are used in these hedging programs. The Companys hedging programs reduce, but do not eliminate, the impact of currency exchange rate movements.
In March 2001, the Company entered into a five-year foreign exchange forward contract (the Forward Contract) for the purpose of reducing the effect of exchange rate fluctuations on forecasted intercompany purchases by its subsidiary in Japan. The Company has designated the Forward Contract as a cash flow hedge under which mark-to-market adjustments are recorded in other comprehensive income, a separate component of stockholders equity, until the forecasted transactions are recorded in earnings. Under the terms of the Forward Contract, the Company is required to exchange 1.2 billion Yen for $11.0 million on a quarterly basis from June 2001 to March 2006. At March 31, 2005, four quarterly payments of 1.2 billion Yen remained to be swapped at a forward exchange rate of 109.32 Yen per U.S. dollar. The market value of the forward contract was a liability of $1.8 million and $2.2 million at March 31, 2005 and June 30, 2004, respectively. Mark-to-market gains (losses), included in other comprehensive income, net of tax, were $1.8 million and ($0.7) million for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively, and ($0.3) million and ($6.9) million for the nine months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively. At March 31, 2005, based on effectiveness tests comparing forecasted transactions through the Forward Contract expiration date to its cash flow requirements, the Company does not
12
expect to incur a material charge to income during the next twelve months as a result of the Forward Contract.
The Company had approximately $101.9 million and $62.4 million in notional amounts of forward contracts not designated as accounting hedges at March 31, 2005 and June 30, 2004, respectively. Net unrealized and realized exchange gains (losses) recognized in earnings were less than $1 million for the three and nine months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004.
Interest Rate Risk
In December 2001, the Company entered into an interest rate swap transaction (the Transaction) with an investment bank, JP Morgan Chase Bank (the Bank), to modify the Companys effective interest payable with respect to $412.5 million of its $550 million outstanding convertible debt (the Debt) (see Note 8). In April 2004, the Company entered into an interest rate swap transaction (the April 2004 Transaction) with the Bank to modify the effective interest payable with respect to the remaining $137.5 million of the Debt. The Company will receive from the Bank fixed payments equal to 4.25 percent of the notional amount, payable on January 15 and July 15. In exchange, the Company will pay to the Bank floating rate payments based upon the London InterBank Offered Rate (LIBOR) multiplied by the notional amount. At the inception of the Transaction, interest rates were lower than that of the Debt and the Company believed that interest rates would remain lower for an extended period of time. The variable interest rate paid since the inception of the swap has averaged 2.39 percent, compared to a coupon of 4.25 percent on the Debt. This arrangement reduced interest expense by $2.6 million and $3.1 million, for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively, and $7.3 million and $9.3 million for the nine months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively.
Accounted for as fair value hedges under SFAS No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, the mark-to-market adjustments of the Transaction and April 2004 Transaction were significantly offset by the mark-to-market adjustments on the Debt, resulting in no material impact to earnings. The market value of the Transaction was $0.9 million liability at March 31, 2005, and $13.1 million asset at June 30, 2004. The market value of the April 2004 Transaction was $3.3 million and $1.3 million liability at March 31, 2005 and June 30, 2004, respectively.
Both Transactions terminate on July 15, 2007 (Termination Date), subject to certain early termination provisions. On or after July 18, 2003 and prior to July 14, 2007, if the ten-day average closing price of the Companys common stock equals or exceeds $77.63, both transactions will terminate. Depending on the timing of the early termination event, the Bank would be obligated to pay the Company an amount equal to the redemption premium called for under the terms of the Debt.
In support of the Companys obligation under the two transactions, the Company is required to obtain irrevocable standby letters of credit in favor of the Bank, totaling $7.5 million plus a collateral requirement for the Transaction and the April 2004 Transaction, as determined periodically. At March 31, 2005, $12.0 million in letters of credit were outstanding related to both transactions.
13
The Transaction and the April 2004 Transaction qualify as fair value hedges under SFAS No. 133. To test effectiveness of the hedge, regression analysis is performed quarterly comparing the change in fair value of the two transactions and the Debt. The fair values of the Transaction, the April 2004 Transaction and the Debt are calculated quarterly as the present value of the contractual cash flows to the expected maturity date, where the expected maturity date is based on probability-weighted analysis of interest rates relating to the five-year LIBOR curve and the Companys stock prices. For the three and nine months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, the hedges were highly effective and therefore, the ineffective portion did not have a material impact on earnings.
In April 2002, the Company entered into an interest rate contract (the Contract) with an investment bank, Lehman Brothers (Lehman), to reduce the variable interest rate risk of the Transaction. The notional amount of the Contract is $412.0 million, representing approximately 75 percent of the Debt. Under the terms of the Contract, the Company has the option to receive a payout from Lehman covering its exposure to LIBOR fluctuations between 5.5 percent and 7.5 percent for any four designated quarters. The market value of the Contract at March 31, 2005 and June 30, 2004, was $0.5 million and $0.9 million, respectively, and was included in other long-term assets. Mark-to-market gains (losses) of $0.2 million and ($0.6) million for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively, and ($0.4) million and ($0.4) million for the nine months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively, were charged to interest expense.
5. Inventories
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost (principally first-in, first-out) or market. Inventories are reviewed for excess and obsolescence based upon demand forecast within a specific time horizon and reserves are established accordingly. Inventories at March 31, 2005 and June 30, 2004 were comprised of the following (in thousands):
|
|
March 31, |
|
June 30, |
|
||
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
||
Raw materials |
|
$ |
39,231 |
|
$ |
30,906 |
|
Work-in-process |
|
77,011 |
|
69,702 |
|
||
Finished goods |
|
55,506 |
|
59,300 |
|
||
Total inventories |
|
$ |
171,748 |
|
$ |
159,908 |
|
6. Goodwill and Acquisition-Related Intangible Assets
The Company accounts for goodwill and acquisition-related intangible assets in accordance with SFAS No. 141, Business Combinations, and SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets. The Company classifies the difference between the purchase price and the fair value of net assets acquired at the date of acquisition as goodwill. The Company classifies intangible assets apart from goodwill if the assets have contractual or other legal rights or if the assets can be separated and sold, transferred, licensed, rented or exchanged. Depending on the nature of the assets acquired, the amortization period may range from four to twelve years for those acquisition-related intangible assets subject to amortization. The Company evaluates the carrying value of goodwill and acquisition-related intangible assets, including the related amortization period, in the fourth quarter of each fiscal
14
year, and when events and circumstances indicate that the assets may be impaired. In evaluating goodwill and intangible assets not subject to amortization, the Company compares the total carrying value of goodwill and intangible assets not subject to amortization to the Companys fair value as determined by its market capitalization. In evaluating intangible assets subject to amortization, the carrying value of each intangible asset is assessed in accordance with SFAS No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets.
At March 31, 2005 and June 30, 2004, goodwill and acquisition-related intangible assets were comprised of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2005 |
|
June 30, 2004 |
|
||||||||
|
|
Amortization |
|
Gross |
|
Accumulated |
|
Gross |
|
Accumulated |
|
||||
Goodwill |
|
|
|
$ |
156,643 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
139,919 |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Acquisition-related intangible assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Completed technology |
|
4 12 |
|
$ |
37,323 |
|
$ |
(11,400 |
) |
$ |
24,293 |
|
$ |
(8,831 |
) |
Distribution rights and customer lists |
|
5 12 |
|
15,667 |
|
(6,852 |
) |
15,454 |
|
(5,681 |
) |
||||
Intellectual property and other |
|
5 12 |
|
7,313 |
|
(4,879 |
) |
7,313 |
|
(3,943 |
) |
||||
Total acquisition-related intangible assets |
|
|
|
$ |
60,303 |
|
$ |
(23,131 |
) |
$ |
47,060 |
|
$ |
(18,455 |
) |
The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for the periods ended March 31, 2005 and June 30, 2004 are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
Total |
|
|
Balance, June 30, 2003 |
|
$ |
136,818 |
|
New acquisition |
|
266 |
|
|
Foreign exchange impact |
|
2,835 |
|
|
Balance, June 30, 2004 |
|
139,919 |
|
|
New acquisitions |
|
13,345 |
|
|
Foreign exchange impact |
|
3,379 |
|
|
Balance, March 31, 2005 |
|
$ |
156,643 |
|
As of March 31, 2005, estimated amortization expense of acquisition-related intangible assets for the next five years are as follows (in thousands): remainder of fiscal 2005: $1,263; fiscal 2006: $4,239; fiscal 2007: $2,899; fiscal 2008: $2,527; fiscal 2009: $2,489; fiscal 2010: $2,489.
15
7. Other accrued expenses
Other accrued expenses at March 31, 2005 and June 30, 2004 were comprised of the following (in thousands):
|
|
March 31, |
|
June 30, |
|
||
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
||
Accrued taxes |
|
$ |
62,286 |
|
$ |
36,934 |
|
Short-term severance liability |
|
6,848 |
|
11,784 |
|
||
Other accrued expenses |
|
35,571 |
|
32,504 |
|
||
Total accrued expenses |
|
$ |
104,705 |
|
$ |
81,222 |
|
8. Bank Loans and Long-Term Debt
A summary of the Companys long-term debt and other loans at March 31, 2005 and June 30, 2004 is as follows (in thousands):
|
|
March 31, |
|
June 30, |
|
||
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
||
Convertible subordinated notes at 4.25% due in 2007 ($550,000 principal amount, plus accumulated fair value adjustment of ($3,592) and $9,173 at March 31, 2005 and June 30, 2004, respectively) |
|
$ |
546,408 |
|
$ |
559,173 |
|
Other loans and capitalized lease obligations |
|
1,699 |
|
1,120 |
|
||
Debt, including current portion of long-term debt ($224 and $274 at March 31, 2005 and June 30, 2004, respectively) |
|
548,107 |
|
560,293 |
|
||
Credit facility and other foreign revolving bank loans at rates from 1.38% to 2.14% |
|
19,248 |
|
18,866 |
|
||
Total debt |
|
$ |
567,355 |
|
$ |
579,159 |
|
In July 2000, the Company sold $550 million principal amount of 4.25 percent Convertible Subordinated Notes due 2007. The interest rate is 4.25 percent per year on the principal amount, payable in cash in arrears semi-annually on January 15 and July 15. The notes are subordinated to all of the Companys existing and future debt. The notes are convertible into shares of the Companys common stock at any time on or before July 15, 2007, at a conversion price of $73.935 per share, subject to certain adjustments. The Company may redeem any of the notes, in whole or in part, subject to certain call premiums on or after July 18, 2003, as specified in the notes and related indenture agreement. In December 2001 and April 2004, the Company entered into two transactions with JP Morgan Chase Bank for $412.5 million and $137.5 million in notional amounts, respectively, which had the effect to the Company of converting the interest rate to variable and requiring that the convertible notes be marked to market (see Note 4).
In November 2003, the Company entered into a three-year syndicated multi-currency revolving credit facility led by BNP Paribas (the Facility). The Facility expires in November 2006 and provides a credit line of $150 million of which up to $150 million may be used for standby letters of credit. The Facility bears interest at (i) local currency rates plus (ii) a margin between 0.75 percent and 2.0 percent for base rate advances and a margin of between 1.75 percent and 3.0 percent for
16
euro-currency rate advances. Other advances bear interest as set forth in the credit agreement. The annual commitment fee for the Facility is subject to a leverage ratio as determined by the credit agreement and was 0.375 percent of the unused portion of the Facility at March 31, 2005. The Facility also contains certain financial and other covenants, with which the Company was in compliance at March 31, 2005. The Company pledged as collateral shares of certain of its subsidiaries. At March 31, 2005, under the Facility, the Company had $18.3 million borrowings and $16.4 million letters of credit outstanding. At June 30, 2004, under the Facility, the Company had $17.2 million borrowings and $14.4 million in letters of credit outstanding. Of the letters of credit outstanding, $12.0 million were related to the interest rate swap transactions (see Note 4) at March 31, 2005 and June 30, 2004.
At March 31, 2005, the Company had $167.2 million in total revolving lines of credit, of which $35.6 million had been utilized, consisting of $16.4 million in letters of credit and $19.2 million under the Facility and other foreign revolving bank loans, which are included in the table above.
9. Impairment of Assets, Restructuring and Severance
During the fiscal 2003 second quarter ended December 31, 2002, the Company announced its restructuring initiatives. Under these initiatives, the goal was to reposition the Company to better fit the market conditions, de-emphasize its commodity business and accelerate the Companys move to proprietary products. Proprietary products refer to the Companys Analog ICs, Advanced Circuit Devices and Power Systems, which includes those products that are value-added or are provided under reduced competition due to their technological content or the Companys customer relationship. The Company periodically reviews products to determine their classification as proprietary products. The Companys restructuring plan included consolidating and closing certain manufacturing sites, upgrading equipment and processes in designated facilities and discontinuing production in a number of others that cannot support more advanced technology platforms or products. The Company also planned to lower overhead costs across its support organizations. The Company has substantially completed these restructuring activities as of March 31, 2005. The Company expects to complete the remaining activities, primarily the move of a fabrication line from El Segundo, California to the Newport, Wales facility and the transition of certain assembly of a government and space products from Leominster, Massachusetts to Tijuana, Mexico, by calendar year-end 2005.
Total charges associated with the December 2002 initiatives are expected to be approximately $261 million. These charges will consist of approximately $210 million for asset impairment, plant closure and other charges, $6 million for raw material and work-in-process inventory, and $45 million for severance-related costs.
For the three months ended March 31, 2005, the Company recorded $8.1 million in total restructuring-related charges, consisting of: $6.3 million for plant closure and relocation costs and other impaired assets charges, and $1.8 million for severance costs. For the three months ended March 31, 2004, the Company recorded $9.9 million in total charges: $3.2 million in relocation and other asset impairment charges and $6.7 million in severance-related costs.
For the nine months ended March 31, 2005, the Company recorded $21.6 million in total restructuring-related charges, consisting of: $16.8 million for plant closure and relocation costs and other impaired assets charges, and $4.8 million for severance costs. For the nine months ended March 31, 2004, the Company recorded $24.0
17
million in total charges: $10.5 million in relocation and other asset impairment charges and $13.5 million in severance-related costs. Restructuring-related costs were charged as incurred in accordance with SFAS No. 146, Accounting for the Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities. Asset impairments were calculated in accordance with SFAS No. 144.
As of March 31, 2005, the Company had recorded $249.0 million in total restructuring-related charges, consisting of: $201.6 million for asset impairment, plant closure costs and other charges, $6.0 million for raw material and work-in-process inventory charges, and $41.4 million for severance-related costs. Components of the $201.6 million asset impairment, plant closure and other charges included the following items:
As the Company emphasizes more advanced generation planar products, it expects the future revenue stream from its less advanced facilities in Temecula, California to decrease significantly. These facilities had a net book value of $138.3 million and were written down by $77.7 million. It is expected that these facilities will continue in use until approximately December 2007 and the remaining basis is being depreciated over units of production during this period. It is assumed that salvage value will equal disposition costs.
As the Company emphasizes more advanced generation trench products, it expects the future revenue stream from its less advanced facility in El Segundo, California to decrease significantly. This facility had a net book value of $59.5 million and was written down by $57.2 million. This facility had significantly reduced production as of fiscal year-end June 30, 2003, and is used primarily for research and development activities.
As the Company emphasizes more advanced generation Schottky products, it expects the future revenue stream from its less advanced facility in Borgaro, Italy to decrease significantly. This facility had a net book value of $20.5 million and was written down by $13.5 million. It is expected that this facility will continue in use until approximately December 2007 and the remaining basis is being depreciated over units of production during this period. It is assumed that salvage value will equal disposition costs.
The Company restructured its manufacturing activities in Europe. Based on a review of its Swansea, Wales facility, a general-purpose module facility, the Company determined this facility would be better suited to focus only on automotive applications. The general-purpose module assets at this facility, with a net book value of $13.6 million, were written down by $8.2 million. In addition, the Company has substantially completed the move of its manufacturing activities from its automotive facility in Krefeld, Germany to its Swansea, Wales and Tijuana, Mexico facilities as of March 31, 2005. The Company has also moved the production from its Venaria, Italy facility to its Borgaro, Italy and Mumbai, India facilities, which was completed as of December 31, 2003. The Company stopped manufacturing products at its Oxted, England facility as of September 30, 2003, and the remaining inventory was transferred to the Tijuana, Mexico assembly facility.
18
The Company has eliminated the manufacturing of its non-space military products in its Santa Clara, California facility as of July 31, 2004. Currently, subcontractors handle the Companys non-space qualified products previously manufactured in this facility. The Company is also transitioning certain assembly of government and space products from its Leominster, Massachusetts facility to its Tijuana, Mexico facility, and expects to complete this activity by fiscal year-end 2005. Associated with these reductions in manufacturing activities, certain assets with a net book value of $4.0 million were written down by $2.0 million.
$43.0 million in other miscellaneous items were charged, including $36.1 million in plant closure and relocation costs and other impaired asset charges and $6.9 million in contract termination and settlement costs.
As a result of the restructuring initiatives, certain raw material and work-in-process inventories were impaired, including products that could not be completed in other facilities, materials that were not compatible with the processes used in the alternative facilities, and materials such as gases and chemicals that could not readily be transferred. Based on these factors the Company wrote down these inventories, with a carrying value of $98.2 million, by $6.0 million in December 2002. The Company had disposed of none and $0.3 million of these inventories, for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively, and $0.7 million and $0.3 million for the nine months ended March 31, 2005 and 2003, respectively, which did not materially impact gross margin. As of March 31, 2005, the Company had disposed of $3.7 million of these inventories.
As of March 31, 2005, the Company has recorded $41.4 million in total severance-related charges: $36.2 million in severance termination costs related to approximately 1,100 administrative, operating and manufacturing positions, and $5.1 million in pension termination costs at our manufacturing facility in Oxted, England. The severance charges associated with the elimination of positions, which included the persons notified to date, had been and will continue to be recognized ratably over the future service period, as applicable, in accordance with SFAS No. 146. The Company measured the total termination benefits at the communication date based on the fair value of the liability as of the termination date. A change resulting from a revision to either the timing or the amount of estimated cash over the future service period will be measured using the credit-adjusted risk-free rate that was used to initially measure the liability. The cumulative effect of the change will be recognized as an adjustment to the liability in the period of the change.
In fiscal 2002, the Company had recorded an estimated $5.1 million in severance costs associated with the acquisition of TechnoFusion GmbH in Krefeld, Germany. In fiscal 2003, the Company finalized its plan and determined that total severance would be approximately $10 million, and accordingly, the Company adjusted purchased goodwill by $4.8 million. The Company communicated the plan and the elimination of approximately 250 positions primarily in manufacturing to its affected employees at that time. The associated severance is expected to be paid by fiscal year-end 2005.
19
The following summarizes the Companys severance accrual related to the TechnoFusion acquisition and the December 2002 restructuring plan for the periods ended March 31, 2005 and June 30, 2004. Severance activity related to the elimination of 29 administrative and operating personnel during the June 2001 restructuring is also disclosed. The remaining June 2001 severance relates primarily to certain legal accruals associated with that restructuring, which will be paid or released as the outcome is determined (in thousands):
|
|
June |
|
December |
|
TechnoFusion |
|
Total |
|
||||
Accrued severance, June 30, 2003 |
|
$ |
1,030 |
|
$ |
5,634 |
|
$ |
9,876 |
|
$ |
16,540 |
|
Costs incurred or charged to impairment of assets, restructuring and severance |
|
|
|
15,450 |
|
|
|
15,450 |
|
||||
Costs paid |
|
(333 |
) |
(13,935 |
) |
(4,390 |
) |
(18,658 |
) |
||||
Foreign exchange impact |
|
|
|
31 |
|
581 |
|
612 |
|
||||
Accrued severance, June 30, 2004 |
|
$ |
697 |
|
$ |
7,180 |
|
$ |
6,067 |
|
$ |
13,944 |
|
Costs incurred or charged to impairment of assets, restructuring and severance |
|
|
|
4,804 |
|
|
|
4,804 |
|
||||
Costs paid |
|
(248 |
) |
(5,531 |
) |
(3,450 |
) |
(9,229 |
) |
||||
Foreign exchange impact |
|
|
|
620 |
|
(17 |
) |
603 |
|
||||
Accrued severance, March 31, 2005 |
|
$ |
449 |
|
$ |
7,073 |
|
$ |
2,600 |
|
$ |
10,122 |
|
20
10. Geographical Information
The Company operates in one business segment. Revenues from unaffiliated customers are based on the location in which the sale originated. The Company includes in long-lived assets, all long-term assets excluding long-term cash investments, long-term deferred income taxes, goodwill and acquisition-related intangibles. Geographic information for March 31, 2005 and 2004, and June 30, 2004, is presented below (in thousands):
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
||||||||
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
North America |
|
$ |
94,873 |
|
$ |
77,734 |
|
$ |
276,749 |
|
$ |
226,080 |
|
Asia |
|
119,280 |
|
122,928 |
|
392,234 |
|
330,966 |
|
||||
Europe |
|
57,205 |
|
63,989 |
|
192,604 |
|
173,823 |
|
||||
Total product revenues |
|
271,358 |
|
264,651 |
|
861,587 |
|
730,869 |
|
||||
Unallocated royalties |
|
10,513 |
|
10,760 |
|
31,069 |
|
30,985 |
|
||||
Total revenues |
|
$ |
281,871 |
|
$ |
275,411 |
|
$ |
892,656 |
|
$ |
761,854 |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
June 30, |
|
||
Long-Lived Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
||
North America |
|
$ |
355,125 |
|
$ |
358,243 |
|
Asia |
|
22,996 |
|
17,728 |
|
||
Europe |
|
215,634 |
|
168,880 |
|
||
Total |
|
$ |
593,755 |
|
$ |
544,851 |
|
No customer accounted for more than 10 percent of the Companys consolidated net revenues for the three and nine months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, or more than 10 percent of the Companys accounts receivable at March 31, 2005 and June 30, 2004.
21
11. Stock-Based Compensation
The Company accounts for stock-based compensation plans using the intrinsic value method prescribed in Accounting Principles Board (APB) Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees. Under the intrinsic value method, the Company does not recognize a compensation expense for stock options granted with an exercise price equaled to the fair market value on the grant date. Had the Company recorded compensation expense using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model under the fair value based method described in SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, net income and net income per common sharebasic and diluted would approximate the following (in thousands, except per share data):
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
||||||||
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Net income, as reported |
|
$ |
35,673 |
|
$ |
26,745 |
|
$ |
112,767 |
|
$ |
60,363 |
|
Less: Total stock-based employee compensation expense determined under fair value based method for all awards, net of tax |
|
(12,343 |
) |
(12,816 |
) |
(38,382 |
) |
(36,226 |
) |
||||
Pro forma net income |
|
$ |
23,330 |
|
$ |
13,929 |
|
$ |
74,385 |
|
$ |
24,137 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Net income per common share-basic, as reported |
|
$ |
0.53 |
|
$ |
0.41 |
|
$ |
1.68 |
|
$ |
0.93 |
|
Net income per common share-basic, pro forma |
|
$ |
0.34 |
|
$ |
0.21 |
|
$ |
1.11 |
|
$ |
0.37 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Net income per common share-diluted, as reported |
|
$ |
0.48 |
|
$ |
0.39 |
|
$ |
1.55 |
|
$ |
0.89 |
|
Net income per common share-diluted, pro forma |
|
$ |
0.32 |
|
$ |
0.20 |
|
$ |
1.05 |
|
$ |
0.37 |
|
The effects of applying SFAS No. 123 in this pro forma disclosure are not indicative of future amounts. SFAS No. 123 does not apply to awards prior to 1996.
In April 2005, the Company accelerated the vesting of all outstanding unvested equity-based compensation awards, including employee stock options and restricted stock units (RSUs). Unvested awards to purchase 6.9 million shares, 1.2 million held by officers and directors, became exercisable as a result of the vesting acceleration. The intrinsic value of the options and RSUs on the acceleration date was $41.4 million, of which $5.1 million were related to awards held by officers and directors. The purpose of the accelerated vesting was to enable the Company to avoid recognizing in its income statement compensation expense associated with these options in future periods, primarily as a result of FASB Statement No. 123R, Share-Based Payment (SFAS No. 123R), which becomes effective for the Company in July 2005. Compensation expense that would have been recorded absent the accelerated vesting, was approximately $108 million of which approximately $60 million would have been in fiscal year 2006.
22
The Company expects a non-cash compensation charge as a result of the accelerated vesting of approximately $6 million in the June 2005 quarter, of which $4 million is related to the excess of the intrinsic value over the fair market value of the Companys stock on the acceleration date of those options that would have been forfeited or expired unexercised had the vesting not been accelerated, and $2 million is related to the amortization of outstanding RSUs, including $0.3 million for the excess of the intrinsic value over the fair market value of the Companys stock on the acceleration date. In determining the forfeiture rates of the stock options, the Company reviewed the unvested options original life, time remaining to vest and whether these options were held by officers and directors of the Company. The compensation charge will be adjusted in future period financial results as actual forfeitures are realized.
12. Environmental Matters
Federal, state, foreign and local laws and regulations impose various restrictions and controls on the storage, use and discharge of certain materials, chemicals and gases used in semiconductor manufacturing processes. The Company does not believe that compliance with such laws and regulations as now in effect will have a material adverse effect on the Companys results of operations, financial position or cash flows.
However, under some of these laws and regulations, the Company could be held financially responsible for remedial measures if properties are contaminated or if waste is sent to a landfill or recycling facility that becomes contaminated. Also, the Company may be subject to common law claims if it releases substances that damage or harm third parties. The Company cannot make assurances that changes in environmental laws and regulations will not require additional investments in capital equipment and the implementation of additional compliance programs in the future, which could have a material adverse effect on the Companys results of operations, financial position or cash flows, as could any failure by the Company to comply with environmental laws and regulations.
International Rectifier Corporation and Rachelle Laboratories, Inc. (Rachelle), a former operating subsidiary of the Company that discontinued operations in 1986, were each named a potentially responsible party (PRP) in connection with the investigation by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) of the disposal of allegedly hazardous substances at a major superfund site in Monterey Park, California (OII Site). Certain PRPs who settled certain claims with the EPA under consent decrees filed suit in Federal Court in May 1992 against a number of other PRPs, including the Company, for cost recovery and contribution under the provisions of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA). IR has settled all outstanding claims that have arisen against it out of the OII Site. No claims against Rachelle have been settled. The Company has taken the position that none of the wastes generated by Rachelle were hazardous.
Counsel for Rachelle received a letter dated August 2001 from the U.S. Department of Justice, directed to all or substantially all PRPs for the OII Site, offering to settle claims against such parties for all work performed through and including the final remedy for the OII Site. The offer required a payment from Rachelle in the amount
23
of approximately $9.3 million in order to take advantage of the settlement. Rachelle did not accept the offer.
In as much as Rachelle has not accepted the settlement, the Company cannot predict whether the EPA or others would attempt to assert an action for contribution or reimbursement for monies expended to perform remedial actions at the OII Site. The Company cannot predict the likelihood that the EPA or such others would prevail against Rachelle in any such action. It remains the position of Rachelle that its wastes were not hazardous. The Companys insurer has not accepted liability, although it has made payments for defense costs for the lawsuit against the Company. The Company has made no accrual for potential loss, if any; however, an adverse outcome could have a material adverse effect on the Companys results of operations or cash flows.
The Company received a letter in June 2001 from a law firm representing UDT Sensors, Inc. relating to environmental contamination (chlorinated solvents such as trichlorethene) assertedly found in UDTs properties in Hawthorne, California. The letter alleges that the Company operated a manufacturing business at that location in the 1970s and/or 1980s and that it may have liability in connection with the claimed contamination. The Company has made no accrual for any potential losses since there has been no assertion of specific facts on which to form the basis for determination of liability.
13. Litigation
In June 2000, the Company filed suit in Federal District Court in Los Angeles, California against IXYS Corporation, alleging infringement of its key U.S. patents 4,959,699; 5,008,725 and 5,130,767. The suit sought damages and other relief customary in such matters. The Federal District Court entered a permanent injunction, effective on June 5, 2002, barring IXYS from making, using, offering to sell or selling in, or importing into the United States, MOSFETs (including IGBTs) covered by the Companys U.S. patents 4,959,699; 5,008,725 and/or 5,130,767. In August 2002, the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit stayed that injunction, pending appeal on the merits. In that same year, following trial on damages issues, a Federal District Court jury awarded the Company $9.1 million in compensatory damages. The Federal District Court subsequently trebled the damages, increasing the award from $9.1 million to approximately $27.2 million, and ruled that the Company is entitled to an additional award of reasonable attorneys fees for a total monetary judgment of about $29.5 million. In March 2004, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit reversed the summary judgment granted the Company by the Federal District Court in Los Angeles of infringement by IXYS of the Companys U.S. patents 4,959,699; 5,008,725 and 5,130,767. The Federal Circuit reversed in part and vacated in part infringement findings of the District Court, granted IXYS the right to present certain affirmative defenses, and vacated the injunction against IXYS entered by the District Court. The ruling by the Federal Circuit will also have the effect of vacating the damages judgment obtained against IXYS. The Federal Circuit affirmed the District Courts rulings in the Companys favor regarding the validity and enforceability of the three Company patents. Upon remand, the Company continues to vigorously pursue its claims for damages and other relief based on IXYS infringement of the asserted patents, and trial on certain matters is set for later this year.
24
14. Income Taxes
The Companys effective tax provision was 25.8 percent and 24.2 percent for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively, and 25.4 percent and 24.1 percent for the nine months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively, rather than the U.S. federal statutory tax provision of 35 percent as a result of lower statutory tax rates in certain foreign jurisdictions, the benefit of foreign tax credits and research and development credits; partially offset by state taxes and certain foreign losses without foreign tax benefit.
No taxes have been provided on undistributed foreign earnings that are planned to be indefinitely reinvested. If future events, including material changes in estimates of cash, working capital and long-term investment requirements necessitate that these earnings be distributed, an additional provision for withholding taxes may apply, which could materially affect the Companys future effective tax rate.
In December 2004, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position No. 109-2, Accounting and Disclosure Guidance for the Foreign Earnings Repatriation Provision within the American Jobs Creations Act of 2004 (AJCA) (FAS No. 109-2), which introduces a limited time 85 percent dividends received deduction on the repatriation of certain foreign earnings to a U.S. tax payer (repatriation provision), provided certain criteria are met. The Company has not begun evaluating the impact of FSP No. 109-2, pending further clarification regarding certain key elements of the provision by the Congress or the Treasury Department.
As a matter of course, the Company is regularly audited by various taxing authorities. Unfavorable settlement of any particular issue would require use of cash. Favorable resolution would be recognized as a reduction to the effective tax rate in the year of resolution, or a reduction of goodwill if it relates to purchased tax liabilities. The Companys tax reserves are included in accrued taxes. While it is often difficult to predict the final outcome or the timing of any particular tax matter, the Company believes the results of these audits will not have a material impact on its financial position or results of operations.
15. Related Party Transactions
As discussed in Note 3, the Company holds as strategic investment common stock of Nihon Inter Electronics Corporation (Nihon), a related party. At March 31, 2005 and June 30, 2004, the Company owned approximately 17.5 percent of the outstanding shares of Nihon. As previously reported, the Companys Chief Financial Officer is the Chairman of the Board and a director of Nihon until June 28, 2005. In addition, the general manager of the Companys Japan subsidiary is a director of Nihon. Although the Company has representation on the Board of Directors of Nihon, it does not exercise significant influence, and accordingly, the Company records its interest in Nihon based on readily determinable market values in accordance with SFAS No. 115 (see Note 3).
In June 2002, the Company entered into agreements to license certain technology to Nihon and to contract Nihon to manufacture certain products. The values of the licensing and manufacturing agreements are approximately $5.4 million and $2.0 million, respectively. Revenues from these agreements were $0 and $0.8 million for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively, and $0.2
25
million and $2.4 million for the nine months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively.
16. Acquisition
In July 2004, the Company acquired the specialty silicon epitaxial services business from Advanced Technology Materials, Inc. (ATMI) for $39.5 million in cash, net of claim settlement as described below, in order to lower certain production costs and to gain certain key intellectual property for epitaxial silicon substrate manufacturing. During the fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2004, the Company and ATMI settled the claim regarding certain processes transferred as part of the purchase transaction that failed to qualify in accordance with contract specifications, and $1.8 million was reimbursed to the Company.
The Company accounted for the acquisition under the purchase method of accounting. The purchase price of $39.6 million was allocated as follows: $25.0 million for fixed assets, $0.8 million for inventory, $1.0 million for acquisition-related intangible assets, $0.3 million for other current assets and $12.5 million for goodwill. The financial results of the acquisition have been included in the consolidated financial statements from the date of the acquisition. The Companys consolidated pro forma net sales, income and earnings per share would not have been materially different from the reported amount for the nine months ended March 31, 2005 and the three and nine months ended March 31, 2004, had the acquisition occurred at the beginning of those periods.
17. Stock Options Exchange Program
In November 2004, at the annual meeting of the shareholders of International Rectifier Corporation, the Companys shareholders approved the Companys offer to exchange certain outstanding employee stock options for new options (the Exchange Offer), which would have presented eligible employees with the opportunity to exchange outstanding options with an exercise price equal to or greater than $40.00 per share for new options that would be granted at least six months and one day after the cancellation of the exchanged options. Since the Companys annual meeting in November 2004, the average closing share price of the Companys stock has been about $43, approximately 20 percent higher than the average closing price over the month prior to the annual meeting. The Company has determined that the Exchange Offer would not be effective under these market conditions, and has decided not to proceed with the Exchange Offer.
26
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following discussion of our financial condition and results of operations should be read together with the consolidated financial statements and notes to consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this Form 10-Q. Except for historic information contained herein, the matters addressed in this Item 2 constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Forward-looking statements may be identified by the use of terms such as anticipate, believe, expect, intend, project, will, and similar expressions. Such forward-looking statements are subject to a variety of risks and uncertainties, including those discussed under the heading Statement of Caution Under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, that could cause actual results to differ materially from those anticipated by us. We undertake no obligation to update these forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date of this report or to reflect actual outcomes.
Overview
We are a leading designer, manufacturer and marketer of power management products. The technology advancements of power management products increase system efficiency, allow more compact end products, improve features and functionality and extend battery life. Our products are used in a range of end markets, including information technology, automotive, consumer electronics, aerospace/defense and industrial.
Our strategy continues to be to transform the Company from a commodity component orientation to a proprietary product focus. Over the past eight quarters, we have increased our proprietary product mix from about 57 percent of revenues to about 70 percent. For the three months ended March 31, 2005, our proprietary product revenues increased by approximately 19 percent compared to a year ago. Our gross margin in the current quarter ended March 31, 2005, was 44.4 percent compared to 39.6 percent four quarters ago and 33.5 percent eight quarters ago. Our proprietary products refer to our Analog ICs, Advanced Circuit Devices and Power Systems. We include in our reference to proprietary products, those products that are value-added or are provided under reduced competition due to their technological content or our customer relationship. We periodically review products to determine their classification as proprietary products.
Revenues increased by 2.3 percent and 17.2 percent for the three and nine months ended March 31, 2005, respectively, compared to the prior-year three and nine months ended March 31, 2004, reflecting continued success of our proprietary products and further improvements in the semiconductor industry. We continue to grow our proprietary product business for energy-conserving applications. We saw a significant increase in the demand for our power management products that are used in energy-conserving appliances and lighting systems, which represented more than half of the revenues into the consumer sector for the nine months ended March 31, 2005. During this period, sales of our products to original equipment manufacturers (OEMs) that are used in energy-conserving appliances and lighting increased by 58 percent compared to the prior-year nine months ended March 31, 2004. As governments and consumers demand greater energy conservation, especially if high oil prices persist, we believe there may be significant growth in this business.
27
Sales levels in the semiconductor industry are higher than they were a year ago, but overall economic conditions remain somewhat uncertain and difficult to predict. We continue to implement initiatives which are consistent with our proprietary product focus to increase our gross margin, while lowering manufacturing costs. During the fiscal 2004 second quarter ended December 31, 2003, we announced the divestiture or discontinuation of certain commodity products representing approximately $100 million of annual revenues. Under this plan, we have discontinued approximately $56 million of annual revenues and expect to divest approximately $44 million of annual revenues by selling our Hi-Power product group, for which we are in serious discussions with several qualified interested buyers.
In January 2005, we announced our plans to discontinue or divest over the next six quarters an additional $150 million in annual revenues that are not consistent with our business objectives to expand our proprietary product portfolio and target gross margin of greater than 50 percent by the end of this time period. In achieving this goal, we are targeting approximately $50 million in revenues from discontinuing products or deciding not to pursue certain revenue generating business opportunities, with the remaining approximately $100 million in targeted revenues arising from structured divestiture. In reviewing the business opportunities, products or product groups to be discontinued or divested, we are considering any components, analog and mixed signal ICs, advanced circuit devices or power systems that are sold in our various end-market applications, including information technology, automotive, consumer, defense/aerospace and industrial sectors, that are no longer consistent with our business or gross margin objectives, whether on an interim or long term basis. In the March quarter, we have discontinued products or decided not to pursue opportunities representing approximately $9 million in revenues for that quarter.
In the upcoming June 2005 quarter, we expect revenues to be consistent with the March 2005 quarter, plus or minus four percent. We also expect our gross margin to be consistent with the March 2005 quarter, plus or minus one percent.
We have substantially completed our restructuring initiatives previously announced in the December 2002 quarter, to consolidate and capitalize on lower cost manufacturing facilities and close several older facilities and legacy operations. We expect to complete the remaining activities, primarily the move of a fabrication line from El Segundo, California to the Newport, Wales facility and the transition of certain assembly of our high-reliability products from Leominster, Massachusetts to Tijuana, Mexico, by calendar year-end 2005. Total charges associated with the December 2002 restructuring plan are expected to be approximately $261 million. These charges are expected to consist of approximately $210 million for asset impairment, plant closure costs and other charges, $6 million for raw material and work-in-process inventory charges, and $45 million for severance-related charges. As of March 31, 2005, we have achieved over $73 million in annualized savings from the restructuring activities, with more than 70 percent of the savings affecting cost of goods sold.
Our research and development program focuses on our proprietary products and the advancement and diversification of certain of our power MOSFET (metal oxide semiconductor field effect transistor) and IGBT (insulated gate bipolar transistors) product lines. We generated royalties primarily from the licensing of our power MOSFET technologies or patents of $10.5 million and $10.8 million for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively, and $31.1 million and $31.0 million for the nine months
28
ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively. In the June 2005 quarter, we expect royalty revenues to be approximately $10 million, plus or minus $1 million. Our licensed MOSFET patents expire between 2005 and 2010, with the broadest remaining in effect until 2007 and 2008. For technologies other than our licensed MOSFET technologies, we are concentrating on incorporating our technologies into proprietary products and exploring licensing opportunities we believe meet our overall business strategies.
Our capital spending in the current period was primarily related to increasing wafer fabrication and component assembly capacity. For the nine months ended March 31, 2005, $34.9 million of the $98.7 million in capital expenditures were related to our Newport, Wales facility. We purchased the Newport facility at the bottom of the last market cycle in fiscal 2002, and are in the process of recommissioning a 200mm wafer fabrication line there. This facility provides our most advanced and cost-effective manufacturing capabilities and offers us significant capacity to support our growth over the next several years. For fiscal 2005, we target capital expenditures of around ten percent of revenues.
For the nine-months ended March 31, 2005, we generated $142.3 million cash from operations and ended the quarter at $852.4 million in total cash and cash investments. Including our $131.6 million of unused credit facilities, we have $984.0 million in total liquidity. This offers us the flexibility to take advantage of strategic opportunities as they arise and to invest in the future. In July 2004, we completed the acquisition of the specialty silicon epitaxial services assets from Advanced Technology Materials, Inc., for $39.6 million in cash, net of claim settlement. This acquisition is expected to lower certain production costs and provide certain key intellectual property for epitaxial silicon substrate manufacturing.
29
Results of Operations for the Three and Nine Months Ended March 31, 2005 Compared with the Three and Nine Months Ended March 31, 2004
The following table summarizes our operating results as a percentage of revenues for the three and nine months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004 ($ in millions):
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
||||||||||||||||
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
||||||||||||
Revenues |
|
$ |
281.9 |
|
100.0 |
% |
$ |
275.4 |
|
100.0 |
% |
$ |
892.7 |
|
100.0 |
% |
$ |
761.9 |
|
100.0 |
% |
Cost of sales |
|
156.6 |
|
55.6 |
|
166.2 |
|
60.4 |
|
504.6 |
|
56.5 |
|
473.7 |
|
62.2 |
|
||||
Gross profit |
|
125.3 |
|
44.4 |
|
109.2 |
|
39.6 |
|
388.1 |
|
43.5 |
|
288.2 |
|
37.8 |
|
||||
Selling and administrative expense |
|
40.7 |
|
14.4 |
|
43.0 |
|
15.6 |
|
128.0 |
|
14.3 |
|
117.7 |
|
15.4 |
|
||||
Research and development expense |
|
27.3 |
|
9.7 |
|
24.2 |
|
8.8 |
|
80.4 |
|
9.1 |
|
67.3 |
|
8.8 |
|
||||
Amortization of acquisition-related intangible assets |
|
1.5 |
|
0.5 |
|
1.4 |
|
0.5 |
|
4.4 |
|
0.5 |
|
4.2 |
|
0.6 |
|
||||
Impairment of assets, restructuring and severance charges |
|
8.1 |
|
2.9 |
|
9.9 |
|
3.6 |
|
21.6 |
|
2.4 |
|
24.0 |
|
3.2 |
|
||||
Other (income) expense, net |
|
0.2 |
|
0.0 |
|
(6.1 |
) |
(2.2 |
) |
0.8 |
|
0.1 |
|
(5.6 |
) |
(0.7 |
) |
||||
Interest (income) expense, net |
|
(0.6 |
) |
(0.2 |
) |
1.5 |
|
0.5 |
|
1.7 |
|
0.2 |
|
1.1 |
|
0.1 |
|
||||
Income before income taxes |
|
48.1 |
|
17.1 |
|
35.3 |
|
12.8 |
|
151.2 |
|
16.9 |
|
79.5 |
|
10.4 |
|
||||
Provision for income taxes |
|
12.4 |
|
4.4 |
|
8.6 |
|
3.1 |
|
38.4 |
|
4.3 |
|
19.1 |
|
2.5 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Net income |
|
$ |
35.7 |
|
12.7 |
% |
$ |
26.7 |
|
9.7 |
% |
$ |
112.8 |
|
12.6 |
% |
$ |
60.4 |
|
7.9 |
% |
Revenues
Revenues increased by 2.3 percent and 17.2 percent for the three and nine months ended March 31, 2005, respectively, compared to the prior-year three and nine months ended March 31, 2004, reflecting continued success of our proprietary products and current market conditions. Revenues from our proprietary products increased by 18.9 percent and 35.6 percent for the three and nine months ended March 31, 2005, respectively, compared to the comparable prior-year periods. These revenues comprised 70 percent of product revenues for the quarter ended March 31, 2005, compared to 61 percent in the prior-year quarter. Royalties contributed $10.5 million and $10.8 million for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively, and $31.1 million and $31.0 million for the nine months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively.
30
Revenues from sales to distributors and OEMs by end-market applications, as a percentage of total product revenues, are as follows:
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
||||
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Information technology |
|
33 |
% |
30 |
% |
33 |
% |
31 |
% |
Automotive |
|
13 |
|
15 |
|
13 |
|
15 |
|
Consumer |
|
13 |
|
12 |
|
12 |
|
11 |
|
Defense/aerospace |
|
9 |
|
9 |
|
8 |
|
8 |
|
Industrial |
|
4 |
|
4 |
|
5 |
|
5 |
|
Total OEM revenues |
|
72 |
|
70 |
|
71 |
|
70 |
|
Distributors |
|
28 |
|
30 |
|
29 |
|
30 |
|
Total product revenues |
|
100 |
% |
100 |
% |
100 |
% |
100 |
% |
Revenues from the information technology sector grew 11 percent and 29 percent for the three and nine months ended March 31, 2005, respectively, compared to the prior-year periods. The increase reflected greater content and market share of our proprietary products for the latest desktops, notebooks and servers, and a general upturn in the information technology market.
Revenues from the automotive sector decreased 14 percent and increased two percent for the three and nine months ended March 31, 2005, respectively, compared to the prior-year periods, reflecting reduced consumer spending.
Revenues from the consumer sector grew 12 percent and 23 percent for the three and nine months ended March 31, 2005, respectively, compared to the prior-year periods, reflecting growth of our power management products used in energy-conserving appliances and lighting systems.
Revenues from the defense/aerospace sector increased 17 percent and 16 percent for the three and nine months ended March 31, 2005, respectively, compared to the prior-year periods, primarily as a result of increase in market share and new programs including advanced aircraft, global positioning satellites and smart weaponry.
Revenues from the industrial sector decreased six percent reflecting current demand in the construction and housing markets in the quarter ended March 31, 2005 compared to the prior-year quarter. Revenues from the industrial sector for the nine-months ended March 31, 2005, increased 17 percent reflecting growth in capital and welding equipment sales as a result of strong construction and housing markets compared to the prior-year period.
Our sales to distributors decreased four percent for the three months ended March 31, 2005, and increased 14 percent for the nine months ended March 31, 2005, compared to the prior-year periods. Our distributors sales to the end customers increased by four percent and 19 percent for the three and nine months ended March 31, 2005, respectively, compared to the prior-year periods.
31
Geographic sales based on the location in which the sale originated, as a percentage of total revenues, for the three and nine months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, are as follows:
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
||||
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North America |
|
34 |
% |
28 |
% |
31 |
% |
30 |
% |
Asia |
|
42 |
|
45 |
|
44 |
|
43 |
|
Europe |
|
20 |
|
23 |
|
22 |
|
23 |
|
Total product revenues |
|
96 |
|
96 |
|
97 |
|
96 |
|
Unallocated royalties |
|
4 |
|
4 |
|
3 |
|
4 |
|
Total revenues |
|
100 |
% |
100 |
% |
100 |
% |
100 |
% |
Gross Profit Margin
The gross profit margin was 44.4 percent in the three months ended March 31, 2005, compared to 39.6 percent in the three months ended March 31, 2004, and 43.5 percent in the nine months ended March 31, 2005, compared to 37.8 percent in the nine months ended March 31, 2004. The improvement reflected the higher margin mix of proprietary products and manufacturing cost savings.
Selling and Administrative Expenses
The selling and administrative expense as a percentage of revenues declined to 14.4 percent for the three months ended March 31, 2005, from 15.6 percent for the three months ended March 31, 2004, and to 14.3 percent for the nine months ended March 31, 2005, from 15.4 percent for the nine months ended March 31, 2003. The decline primarily reflected a higher revenue base in the current year compared to the prior year and our cost containment efforts. The absolute selling and administrative expense decreased to $40.7 million from $43.0 million for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively, and increased to $128.0 million from $117.7 million for the nine months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively, reflecting sales commissions and other variable costs paid on a higher revenue base.
Research and Development Expenses
The research and development expenditures were $27.3 million (9.7 percent of revenues) and $24.2 million (8.8 percent of revenues) for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively, and $80.4 million (9.1 percent of revenues) and $67.3 million (8.8 percent of revenues) for the nine months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively, reflecting our ongoing research and development focus on proprietary products.
32
Impairment of Assets, Restructuring and Severance
During the fiscal 2003 second quarter ended December 31, 2002, we announced our restructuring initiatives. Under our restructuring initiatives, our goal was to reposition the Company to better fit the market conditions, de-emphasize the commodity business and accelerate the move to what we categorize as our proprietary products. Our restructuring plan included consolidating and closing certain manufacturing sites, upgrading equipment and processes in designated facilities and discontinuing production in a number of others that cannot support more advanced technology platforms or products. We also planned to lower overhead costs across our support organizations. We have substantially completed these restructuring activities as of March 31, 2005. We expect to complete the remaining activities, primarily the move of a fabrication line from El Segundo, California to the Newport, Wales facility and the transition of certain assembly of our government and space products from Leominster, Massachusetts to Tijuana, Mexico by calendar year-end 2005.
Total charges associated with the plan are expected to be approximately $261 million. These charges will consist of approximately $210 million for asset impairment, plant closure costs and other charges, $6 million for raw material and work-in-process inventory, and $45 million for severance-related charges. Of the $261 million in total charges, cash charges are expected to be approximately $81 million. As of March 31, 2005, we have achieved over $73 million in annualized savings from the restructuring activities, with more than 70 percent of that savings affecting cost of goods sold.
For the three months ended March 31, 2005, we recorded $8.1 million in total restructuring-related charges, consisting of: $6.3 million for plant closure and relocation costs and other impaired assets charges, and $1.8 million for severance costs. For the three months ended March 31, 2004, we recorded $9.9 million in total charges: $3.2 million in relocation and other asset impairment charges and $6.7 million in severance-related costs.
For the nine months ended March 31, 2005, we recorded $21.6 million in total restructuring-related charges, consisting of: $16.8 million plant closure costs and other charges and $4.8 million in severance costs. For the nine months ended March 31, 2004, we recorded $24.0 million in total charges: $10.5 million in relocation and other asset impairment charges and $13.5 million in severance-related costs. Restructuring-related costs were charged as incurred in accordance with SFAS No. 146, Accounting for the Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities. Asset impairments were calculated in accordance with SFAS No. 144.
As of March 31, 2005, we had recorded $249.0 million in total restructuring-related charges, consisting of: $201.6 million for asset impairment, plant closure costs and other charges, $6.0 million for raw material and work-in-process inventory charges, and $41.4 million for severance-related costs. Components of the $201.6 million asset impairment, plant closure and other charges included the following items:
As we emphasize more advanced generation planar products, we expect the future revenue stream from our less advanced facilities in Temecula, California to decrease significantly. These facilities had a net book value of $138.3 million and were written down by $77.7 million. It is expected that these facilities will continue in use until approximately December 2007 and the remaining basis is being
33
depreciated over units of production during this period. It is assumed that salvage value will equal disposition costs.
As we emphasize more advanced generation trench products, we expect the future revenue stream from our less advanced facility in El Segundo, California to decrease significantly. This facility had a net book value of $59.5 million and was written down by $57.2 million. This facility had significantly reduced production as of fiscal year-end June 30, 2003, and is used primarily for research and development activities.
As we emphasize more advanced generation Schottky products, we expect the future revenue stream from our less advanced facility in Borgaro, Italy to decrease significantly. This facility had a net book value of $20.5 million and was written down by $13.5 million. It is expected that this facility will continue in use until approximately December 2007 and the remaining basis is being depreciated over units of production during this period. It is assumed that salvage value will equal disposition costs.
We have restructured our manufacturing activities in Europe. Based on a review of our Swansea, Wales facility, a general-purpose module facility, we determined this facility would be better suited to focus only on automotive applications. The general-purpose module assets at this facility, with a net book value of $13.6 million, were written down by $8.2 million. In addition, we have substantially completed the move of our manufacturing activities from our automotive facility in Krefeld, Germany to our Swansea, Wales and Tijuana, Mexico facilities as of March 31, 2005. We have also moved the production from our Venaria, Italy facility to our Borgaro, Italy and Mumbai, India facilities, which was completed as of March 31, 2004. We stopped manufacturing products at our Oxted, England facility as of September 30, 2003, and the remaining inventory was transferred to the Tijuana, Mexico assembly facility.
We have eliminated the manufacturing of our non-space military products in our Santa Clara, California facility as of July 31, 2004. Currently, subcontractors handle our non-space qualified products previously manufactured in this facility. We are also transitioning certain assembly of government and space products from our Leominster, Massachusetts facility to our Tijuana, Mexico facility, and expect to complete this activity by fiscal year-end 2005. Associated with these reductions in manufacturing activities, certain assets with a net book value of $4.0 million were written down by $2.0 million.
$43.0 million in other miscellaneous items were charged, including $36.1 million in plant closure and relocation costs and other impaired asset charges and $6.9 million in contract termination and settlement costs.
As a result of the restructuring initiatives, certain raw material and work-in-process inventories were impaired, including products that could not be completed in other facilities, materials that were not compatible with the processes used in the alternative facilities, and materials such as gases and chemicals that could not readily be transferred. Based on these factors we wrote down these inventories, with a carrying value of $98.2 million, by $6.0 million in December 2002. We had disposed of none and
34
$0.3 million of these inventories for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively, and $0.7 million and $0.3 million of these inventories for the nine months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively, which did not materially impact gross margin. As of March 31, 2005, we had disposed of $3.7 million of these inventories.
Our restructuring activities are expected to result in total severance charges of $45 million through calendar year-end 2005. Below is a table of approximate severance charges by major activity and location:
Location |
|
Activity |
|
Amount |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
El Segundo, California |
|
Close manufacturing facility |
|
$ |
7 million |
|
Santa Clara, California and Leominster, Massachusetts |
|
Eliminate certain manufacturing activities |
|
4 million |
|
|
Oxted, England |
|
Close manufacturing facility |
|
4 million |
|
|
Venaria, Italy |
|
Move manufacturing to India and discontinue certain products |
|
10 million |
|
|
Company-wide |
|
Realign business processes |
|
20 million |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
$ |
45 million |
|
To date, of the $45 million noted above, we have recorded $41.4 million in severance-related charges: $36.2 million in severance termination costs related to approximately 1,100 administrative, operating and manufacturing positions, and $5.1 million in pension termination costs at our manufacturing facility in Oxted, England. The severance charges associated with the elimination of positions, which included the persons notified to date, had been and will continue to be recognized ratably over the future service period, as applicable, in accordance with SFAS No. 146, Accounting for the Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities. We measured the total termination benefits at the communication date based on the fair value of the liability as of the termination date. A change resulting from a revision to either the timing or the amount of estimated cash over the future service period will be measured using the credit-adjusted risk-free rate that was used to initially measure the liability. The cumulative effect of the change will be recognized as an adjustment to the liability in the period of the change.
In fiscal 2002, we had recorded an estimated $5.1 million in severance costs associated with the acquisition of TechnoFusion GmbH in Krefeld, Germany. In fiscal 2003, we finalized our plan and determined that total severance would be approximately $10 million, and accordingly, we adjusted purchased goodwill by $4.8 million. We communicated the plan and the elimination of approximately 250 positions primarily in manufacturing to the affected employees at that time. The associated severance is expected to be paid by fiscal year-end 2005.
35
The following summarizes our severance accrued related to the TechnoFusion acquisition and the December 2002 restructuring plan for the periods ended March 31, 2005 and June 30, 2004. Severance activity related to the elimination of 29 administrative and operating personnel during the June 2001 restructuring is also disclosed. The remaining June 2001 severance relates primarily to certain legal accruals associated with that restructuring, which will be paid or released as the outcome is determined (in thousands):
|
|
June |
|
December |
|
TechnoFusion |
|
Total |
|
||||
Accrued severance, June 30, 2003 |
|
$ |
1,030 |
|
$ |
5,634 |
|
$ |
9,876 |
|
$ |
16,540 |
|
Costs incurred or charged to impairment of assets, restructuring and severance |
|
|
|
15,450 |
|
|
|
15,450 |
|
||||
Costs paid |
|
(333 |
) |
(13,935 |
) |
(4,390 |
) |
(18,658 |
) |
||||
Foreign exchange impact |
|
|
|
31 |
|
581 |
|
612 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Accrued severance, June 30, 2004 |
|
$ |
697 |
|
$ |
7,180 |
|
$ |
6,067 |
|
$ |
13,944 |
|
Costs incurred or charged to impairment of assets, restructuring and severance |
|
|
|
4,804 |
|
|
|
4,804 |
|
||||
Costs paid |
|
(248 |
) |
(5,531 |
) |
(3,450 |
) |
(9,229 |
) |
||||
Foreign exchange impact |
|
|
|
620 |
|
(17 |
) |
603 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Accrued severance, March 31, 2005 |
|
$ |
449 |
|
$ |
7,073 |
|
$ |
2,600 |
|
$ |
10,122 |
|
Interest (Income) Expense, Net
Interest income was $4.4 million and $3.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively, and $11.6 million and $11.3 million for the nine months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively, reflecting higher interest yield in the current period.
Interest expense was $3.8 million and $4.8 million for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively, primarily reflecting mark-to-market adjustments on our interest rate swap (see Note 4, Derivative Financial Instruments). Interest expense was $13.3 million and $12.4 million for the nine months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively, primarily reflecting higher interest incurred on our convertible debt (see Note 8, Bank Loans and Long-Term Debt).
Income Taxes
Our effective tax provision was 25.8 percent and 24.2 percent for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively, and 25.4 percent and 24.1 percent for the nine months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively, rather than the U.S. federal statutory tax provision of 35 percent, as a result of lower statutory tax rates in certain foreign jurisdictions, the benefit of foreign tax credits and research and development credits, partially offset by state taxes and certain foreign losses without foreign tax benefits.
36
No taxes have been provided on undistributed foreign earnings that are planned to be indefinitely reinvested. If future events, including material changes in estimates of cash, working capital and long-term investment requirements necessitate that these earnings be distributed, an additional provision for withholding taxes may apply, which could materially affect our future effective tax rate.
As a matter of course, we are regularly audited by various taxing authorities. Unfavorable settlement of any particular issue would require use of cash. Favorable resolution would be recognized as a reduction to the effective tax rate in the year of resolution, or a reduction of goodwill if it relates to purchased tax liabilities. Our tax reserves are included in accrued taxes. While it is often difficult to predict the final outcome or the timing of any particular tax matter, we believe the results of these audits will not have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
At March 31, 2005, we had cash and cash equivalent balances of $312.0 million and cash investments in marketable debt securities of $540.4 million. Our cash, cash equivalents, cash investments in marketable debt securities and unused credit facilities of $131.6 million, totaled $984.0 million. Our investment portfolio consists of available-for-sale fixed-income, principally investment-grade securities.
For the nine months ended March 31, 2005, cash provided by operating activities was $142.3 million compared to $83.2 million in the comparable prior-year period. Depreciation and amortization adjusted cash flows from operations by $56.2 million. Other non-cash items adjusted cash flows from operations by ($4.9) million. Changes in operating assets and liabilities decreased cash by $21.9 million during the nine months ended March 31, 2005. The increase in working capital primarily reflected the timing of accounts and other receivable collections and salaries and wages expense payments, partially offset by higher accrued taxes balance reflecting the timing of tax payments.
For the nine months ended March 31, 2005, cash used in investing activities was $206.3 million. We purchased $375.9 million and sold $332.1 million of cash investments. Certain prior years amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation. Auction rate securities are currently classified as available-for-sale securities and reported as short-term cash investments instead of cash and cash equivalents for all periods presented. The auction rate securities were $0 and $100.6 million at March 31, 2005 and June 30, 2004, respectively. We invested $98.7 million in capital expenditures primarily related to increasing wafer fabrication and component assembly capacity. For the nine month ended March 31, 2005, $34.9 million of the $98.7 million in capital expenditures were related to our Newport, Wales facility. We purchased the Newport facility at the bottom of the last market cycle in fiscal 2002, and are in the process of recommissioning a 200mm wafer fabrication line there. This facility provides our most advanced and cost-effective manufacturing capabilities and offers us significant capacity to support our growth over the next several years. We acquired the specialty silicon epitaxial services assets from Advanced Technology Materials, Inc. (ATMI) for $39.6 million in cash, net of the claim settled on certain processes determined to not qualify in accordance with contract specifications. We acquired certain other technologies for $11.5 million. At March 31, 2005, we had made purchase commitments for capital expenditures of approximately $28.5 million. We are in serious discussions to sell our Hi-Power unit. We do not expect the ultimate sale to have a material impact on our liquidity.
Financing activities for the nine months ended March 31, 2005, generated $34.5 million as a result of proceeds from stock issued from options exercised and employee stock
37
participation plan. In April 2005, we accelerated the vesting of all outstanding unvested equity-based compensation awards. We assume that there will be a significant rise in award activities to result in increased cash in flow and shares outstanding in the June 2005 quarter.
As of March 31, 2005, we had revolving, equipment and foreign credit facilities of $167.2 million, against which $35.6 million had been used. As discussed in Note 4 of the unaudited consolidated financial statements, we are required to obtain irrevocable standby letters of credit in favor of JP Morgan Chase Bank, for $7.5 million plus the collateral requirement for the interest rate swap transactions, as determined periodically. At March 31, 2005, $12.0 million in letters of credit were outstanding related to the transactions. The collateral requirement of the transactions may be adversely affected by an increase in the five-year LIBOR curve, a decrease in our stock price, or both. We cannot predict what the collateral requirement of the transactions and the letter of credit requirement will be over time. To illustrate the potential impact, had a 10 percent increase in the five-year LIBOR curve and a 10 percent decrease in our stock price occurred at the close of the fiscal quarter, our letter of credit commitment would have remained $12.0 million.
We believe that our current cash and cash investment balances, cash flows from operations and borrowing capacity, including unused amounts under the $150 million Credit Facility as discussed in Note 8 of the unaudited consolidated financial statements, will be sufficient to meet our operating requirements and to take advantage of strategic opportunities as they occur in the next twelve months. Although we believe that our current financial resources will be sufficient for normal operating activities, we may also consider the use of funds from other external sources, including, but not limited to, public or private offerings of debt or equity.
38
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In March 2005, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 47, Accounting for Conditional Asset Retirement Obligations (FIN 47), which clarifies the term conditional asset retirement obligations as used in FASB Statement No. 143, Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations (SFAS No. 143). SFAS No. 143 refers to an entitys legal obligation to perform an asset retirement activity in which the timing and/or method of settlement are conditional on a future event that may or may not be within the control of the entity. If an entity can reasonably estimate a liability for the fair value of a conditional asset retirement obligation, the entity is required to recognize the fair value of the liability when incurred. A company normally incurs this liability upon acquisition, construction, or development of the asset at issue. FIN 47 is effective for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2005. We do not believe FIN 47 will have a material impact on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
In December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued SFAS No. 123R, Share-Based Payment (SFAS No. 123R). SFAS No. 123R requires all share-based payments to employees, including grants of employee stock options and purchases under employee stock purchase plans, to be recognized as an operating expense in the income statement. The cost is recognized over the requisite service period based on fair values measured on grant dates, and the new standard may be adopted using either the modified prospective transition method or the modified retrospective transition method. In April 2005, the SEC approved a change in the effective date of SFAS No. 123R for public companies to be effective in the annual, rather than interim, periods beginning after June 15, 2005. SFAS No. 123R will be effective for us beginning in the September 2005 quarter of fiscal year 2006. We believe the adoption of SFAS No. 123R may have a material adverse impact on our consolidated financial position and results of operations for future employee stock options granted. We are currently evaluating our stock-based employee compensation programs and alternative valuation methods to determine the extent of the impact. SFAS No. 123R will not have an impact on our options outstanding as of April 18, 2005 as we have accelerated the vesting of these awards.
In March 2005, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 107 (SAB No. 107) Share-Based Payment, which expresses views of the Staff regarding the interaction between SFAS No. 123R (SFAS No. 123R) Share-Based Payment and certain SEC rules and regulations. SAB No. 107 also provides the Staffs views regarding the valuation of share-based payment arrangements for public companies. We will evaluate the requirements of SAB No. 107 in connection with our adoption of SFAS No. 123R.
In December 2004, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position No. FAS 109-1 Application of FASB Statement No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes, to the Tax Deduction on Qualified Production Activities by the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004) (FAS No. 109-1). The AJCA introduces a special nine percent tax deduction on qualified production activities. FSP No. 109-1 clarifies that this tax deduction should be accounted for as a special tax deduction in accordance with SFAS No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes, rather than as a tax rate reduction. We are still assessing the potential impact of this new legislation based on the fact that additional guidance is still being issued. We currently do not believe the adoption of FAS 109-1 will have a material impact on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
In December 2004, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position No. 109-2, Accounting and Disclosure Guidance for the Foreign Earnings Repatriation Provision within the American Jobs Creations Act of 2004 (AJCA) (FAS No. 109-2), which introduces a limited time
39
85 percent dividends received deduction on the repatriation of certain foreign earnings to a U.S. tax payer (repatriation provision), provided certain criteria are met. We have not begun evaluating the impact of FSP No. 109-2, pending further clarification regarding certain key elements of the provision by Congress or the Treasury Department.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
The consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States which require us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and revenues and expenses during the periods reported. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Information with respect to our critical accounting policies which we believe could have the most significant effect on our reported results and require subjective or complex judgments is contained in Item 7, Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2004. We believe that at March 31, 2005, there has been no material change to this information.
40
Statement of Caution Under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995
This Form 10-Q Report contains some statements and other information that are not historical facts but are forward-looking statements as that term is defined in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. The materials presented can be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology such as anticipate, believe, estimate, may, should, will, or expect, or the negative or variations thereof, whether set out in the text of documents or in graphs. Such forward-looking statements are subject to a number of uncertainties and risks, and actual results may differ materially from those projected.
Downturns in the highly cyclical semiconductor industry or changes in end market demand could affect our operating results and the value of our business.
The semiconductor industry is highly cyclical and the value of our business may decline during the down portion of these cycles. We have experienced these conditions in our business in the recent past and we cannot predict when we may experience such downturns in the future. Future downturns in the semiconductor industry, or any failure of the industry to recover fully from its recent downturns could seriously impact our revenues and harm our business, financial condition and results of operations. Although markets for our semiconductors appear to be stable, we cannot assure you that they will continue to be stable or that our markets will not experience renewed, possibly more severe and prolonged, downturns in the future.
In addition, we may experience significant changes in our profitability as a result of variations in sales, seasonality, changes in product mix, price competition for orders and the costs associated with the introduction of new products and start-up of new facilities. The markets for our products depend on continued demand in the communications, consumer electronics, information technology, automotive, industrial and defense/aerospace markets, and these end markets may experience changes in demand that could adversely affect our operating results and financial condition.
Consumer and/or corporate spending for the end market applications which incorporate our products may be reduced due to increased oil prices or otherwise.
Our revenues and gross margin guidance is dependent on certain level of consumer and/or corporate spending. If our projections of these expenditures failed to materialize, due to reduced consumer or corporate spending from increased oil prices or otherwise, our revenues and gross margin could be adversely impacted.
The semiconductor business is highly competitive and increased competition could reduce the value of an investment in our company.
The semiconductor industry, including the sector in which we do business, is highly competitive. Competition is based on price, product performance, product availability, quality, reliability and customer service. Price pressures may emerge as competitors attempt to gain a greater market share by lowering prices. We compete in various markets with companies of various sizes, many of which are larger and have greater financial and other resources than we have, and thus they may be better able to pursue acquisition candidates and to withstand adverse economic or market conditions. In
41
addition, companies not currently in direct competition with us may introduce competing products in the future.
If we are unable to implement our business strategy, our revenues and profitability may be adversely affected.
Our future financial performance and success are largely dependent on our ability to implement our business strategy successfully of transforming our business to one led by our proprietary products and succeeding on our plans to restructure our company. We cannot assure you that we will continue to successfully implement our business strategy or that implementing our strategy will sustain or improve our results of operations.
The failure to execute on our plans to divest or discontinue, over the next six quarters, up to $250 million of annual revenues that are not consistent with our business objectives, and replace those revenues with higher-margin product sales could adversely affect our operating results.
During the fiscal 2004 second quarter ended December 31, 2003, we announced the divestiture or discontinuation of certain of our commodity products representing approximately $100 million of annual revenues. We have discontinued approximately $56 million annual revenues and expect to divest approximately $44 million of annual revenues by selling our Hi-Power product group. In addition to this $100 million in annual revenues, in January 2005, we announced our plans to divest or discontinue over the next six quarters, an additional $150 million in annual revenues (whether through product discontinuation divestiture, business opportunity rejection, or otherwise) that are not consistent with our business objectives or margin targets. Our plan is to replace the divested or discontinued revenues with higher-margin product sales and target gross margin of greater 50 percent by the end of the next six quarters. We cannot assure you that we will complete our plans or achieve our target gross margin within this period or at all. The activities involved with the divestiture and discontinuation of product sales could involve changes to various aspects of our business which could adversely affect our profitability to an extent we have not anticipated. Even if we fully execute and implement our plans, there may be unforeseen factors that could adversely impact our operating results.
The failure to implement, as well as the completion and impact of our restructuring programs and cost reductions could adversely affect our business.
In December 2002, we announced a number of restructuring initiatives. Our goal was to reposition our company to better fit the market conditions, de-emphasize our commodity business and accelerate the move to what we categorize as our proprietary products. The restructuring includes consolidating and closing certain manufacturing sites, upgrading equipment and processes in designated facilities and discontinuing production in a number of others that cannot support more advanced technology platforms or products. The restructuring also includes lowering overhead costs across our support organization. We cannot assure you that these restructuring initiatives will achieve their goals or accomplish the cost reductions planned. Additionally, because our restructuring activities involve changes to many aspects of our business, the costs reductions could adversely affect productivity and sales to an extent we have not anticipated. Even if we fully execute and implement these restructuring activities, and they generate the anticipated cost savings, there may be other unforeseen factors that could adversely impact our profitability and business.
42
Corporate investment and expenditures in the Information Technology sector and in Information Technology purchases may not materialize as we have planned.
Our revenues and gross margin guidance is dependent on a certain level of corporate investment and expenditures in the Information Technology sector and in Information Technology purchases. If our projections of these expenditures fail to materialize (whether due to increased oil prices or otherwise), our revenues and gross margin could be adversely impacted.
New technologies could result in the development of new products and a decrease in demand for our products, and we may not be able to develop new products to satisfy changes in demand.
Our failure to develop new technologies or react to changes in existing technologies could materially delay our development of new products, which could result in decreased revenues and a loss of market share to our competitors. Rapidly changing technologies and industry standards, along with frequent new product introductions, characterize the semiconductor industry. As a result, we must devote significant resources to research and development. Our financial performance depends on our ability to design, develop, manufacture, assemble, test, market and support new products and enhancements on a timely and cost-effective basis. We cannot assure you that we will successfully identify new product opportunities and develop and bring new products to market in a timely and cost-effective manner, or that products or technologies developed by others will not render our products or technologies obsolete or noncompetitive. A fundamental shift in technologies in our product markets could have a material adverse effect on our competitive position within the industry. In addition, to remain competitive, we must continue to reduce die sizes and improve manufacturing yields. We cannot assure you that we can accomplish these goals.
Our failure to obtain or maintain the right to use certain technologies may negatively affect our financial results.
Our future success and competitive position may depend in part upon our ability to obtain or maintain certain proprietary technologies used in our principal products, which is achieved in part by defending and maintaining the validity of our patents and defending claims by our competitors of intellectual property infringement. We license certain patents owned by others. We have also been notified that certain of our products may infringe the patents of third parties. Although licenses are generally offered in such situations, we cannot eliminate the risk of litigation alleging patent infringement. We are currently a defendant in intellectual property claims and we could become subject to other lawsuits in which it is alleged that we have infringed upon the intellectual property rights of others.
Our involvement in existing and future intellectual property litigation could result in significant expense, adversely affect sales of the challenged product or technologies and divert the efforts of our technical and management personnel, whether or not such litigation is resolved in our favor. If any such infringements exist, arise or are claimed in the future, we may be exposed to substantial liability for damages and may need to obtain licenses from the patent owners, discontinue or change our processes or products or expend significant resources to develop or acquire non-infringing technologies. We cannot assure you that we would be successful in such efforts or that such licenses would be available under reasonable terms. Our failure to develop or acquire non-infringing technologies or to obtain licenses on acceptable terms or the occurrence of related
43
litigation itself could have a material adverse effect on our operating results and financial condition.
Our ongoing protection and reliance on our intellectual property assets expose us to risks.
We have traditionally relied on our patents and proprietary technologies. Patent litigation settlements and royalty income substantially contribute to our financial results. Enforcement of our intellectual property rights is costly, risky and time-consuming. We cannot assure you that we can successfully continue to protect our intellectual property rights, especially in foreign markets. Our key MOSFET patents expire between 2005 and 2010, although our broadest MOSFET patents expire in 2007 and 2008. Our royalty income is largely dependent on the following factors: the remaining terms of our MOSFET patents; the continuing introduction and acceptance of products that are not covered by our patents; remaining covered under unexpired MOSFET patents; the defensibility and enforceability of our patents; changes in our licensees unit sales, prices or die sizes; and the terms, if any, upon which expiring license agreements are renegotiated. Market conditions and mix of licensee products, as well as sales of non-infringing devices can significantly affect royalty income. Any decrease in our royalty income could have a material adverse effect on our operating results and financial condition.
Our international operations expose us to material risks.
We expect revenues from foreign markets to continue to represent a significant portion of total revenues. We maintain or contract with significant operations in foreign countries. Among others, the following risks are inherent in doing business internationally: changes in, or impositions of, legislative or regulatory requirements, including tax laws in the United States and in the countries in which we manufacture or sell our products; trade restrictions; transportation delays; work stoppages; economic and political instability; and foreign currency fluctuations.
In addition, certain of our operations and products are subject to restrictions or licensing under U.S. export laws. If such laws or the implementation of these restrictions change, or if in the course of operating under such laws we become subject to claims, we cannot assure you that such factors would not have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and operating results.
In addition, it is more difficult in some foreign countries to protect our products or intellectual property rights to the same extent as is possible in the United States. Therefore, the risk of piracy or misuse of our technology and products may be greater in these foreign countries. Although we have not experienced any material adverse effect on our operating results as a result of these and other factors, we cannot assure you that such factors will not have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and operating results in the future.
Delays in initiation of production at new facilities, implementing new production techniques or resolving problems associated with technical equipment malfunctions could adversely affect our manufacturing efficiencies.
Our manufacturing efficiency will be an important factor in our future profitability, and we cannot assure you that we will be able to maintain or increase our manufacturing efficiency to the same extent as our competitors. Our manufacturing processes are highly
44
complex, require advanced and costly equipment and are continuously being modified in an effort to improve yields and product performance. Impurities, defects or other difficulties in the manufacturing process can lower yields.
In addition, as is common in the semiconductor industry, we have from time to time experienced difficulty in beginning production at new facilities or in effecting transitions to new manufacturing processes. As a consequence, we have experienced delays in product deliveries and reduced yields. We may experience manufacturing problems in achieving acceptable yields or experience product delivery delays in the future as a result of, among other things, capacity constraints, construction delays, upgrading or expanding existing facilities or changing our process technologies, any of which could result in a loss of future revenues. Our operating results could also be adversely affected by the increase in fixed costs and operating expenses related to increases in production capacity if revenues do not increase proportionately.
We are currently recommissioning the Newport, Wales facility. We are also transferring manufacturing from our Krefeld, Germany to our Swansea, Wales and Tijuana, Mexico facilities, and transferring assembly of certain high-reliability products from our Santa Clara, California and Leominster, Massachussett facilities to our Tijuana, Mexico facility. Delays or technical problems in the recommissioning of the Newport, Wales facility and completing the various transfers could lead to increased costs, reduced yields, delays in product deliveries, order cancellations and/or lost revenue.
Interruptions, delays or cost increases affecting our materials, parts or equipment may impair our competitive position and our operations.
Our manufacturing operations depend upon obtaining adequate supplies of materials, parts and equipment, including silicon, mold compounds and leadframes, on a timely basis from third parties. Our results of operations could be adversely affected if we were unable to obtain adequate supplies of materials, parts and equipment in a timely manner or if the costs of materials, parts or equipment increase significantly. From time to time, suppliers may extend lead times, limit supplies or increase prices due to capacity constraints or other factors. We have a limited number of suppliers for some materials, parts and equipment, and any interruption could materially impair our operations.
We manufacture a substantial portion of our wafer product at our Temecula, California and Newport, Wales facilities. Any disruption of operations at those facilities could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Also, some of our products are assembled and tested by third party subcontractors. We do not have any long-term assembly agreements with these subcontractors. As a result, we do not have immediate control over our product delivery schedules or product quality. Due to the amount of time often required to qualify assemblers and testers and the high cost of qualifying multiple parties for the same products, we could experience delays in the shipment of our products if we are forced to find alternative third parties to assemble or test them. Any product delivery delays in the future could have a material adverse effect on our operating results and financial condition. Our operations and ability to satisfy customer obligations could be adversely affected if our relationships with these subcontractors were disrupted or terminated.
45
We must commit resources to product manufacturing prior to receipt of purchase commitments and could lose some or all of the associated investment.
We sell products primarily pursuant to purchase orders for current delivery or to forecast, rather than pursuant to long-term supply contracts. Many of these purchase orders or forecasts may be revised or canceled without penalty. As a result, we must commit resources to the manufacturing of products without any advance purchase commitments from customers. Our inability to sell products after we devote significant resources to them could have a material adverse effect on our levels of inventory and our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We receive a significant portion of our revenues from a small number of customers and distributors.
Historically, a significant portion of our revenues has come from a relatively small number of customers and distributors. The loss or financial failure of any significant customer or distributor, any reduction in orders by any of our significant customers or distributors, or the cancellation of a significant order, could materially and adversely affect our business.
We may fail to attract or retain the qualified technical, sales, marketing and managerial personnel required to operate our business successfully.
Our future success depends, in part, upon our ability to attract and retain highly qualified technical, sales, marketing and managerial personnel. Personnel with the necessary semiconductor expertise are scarce and competition for personnel with these skills is intense. We cannot assure you that we will be able to retain existing key technical, sales, marketing and managerial employees or that we will be successful in attracting, assimilating or retaining other highly qualified technical, sales, marketing and managerial personnel in the future. If we are unable to retain existing key employees or are unsuccessful in attracting new highly qualified employees, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected.
We are acquiring and may continue to acquire other companies and may be unable to successfully integrate such companies with our operations.
We have acquired several companies over the past three years. We may continue to expand and diversify our operations with additional acquisitions. If we are unsuccessful in integrating these companies with our operations, or if integration is more difficult than anticipated, we may experience disruptions that could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
The price of our common stock has fluctuated widely in the past and may fluctuate widely in the future.
Our common stock, which is traded on The New York Stock Exchange, has experienced and may continue to experience significant price and volume fluctuations that could adversely affect the market price of our common stock without regard to our operating performance. In addition, we believe that factors such as quarterly fluctuations in financial results, earnings below analysts estimates and financial performance and other activities of other publicly traded companies in the semiconductor industry could cause the price of our common stock to fluctuate substantially. In addition, in recent periods, our common stock, the stock market in general and the market for shares of semiconductor
46
industry-related stocks in particular have experienced extreme price fluctuations which have often been unrelated to the operating performance of the affected companies. Any similar fluctuations in the future could adversely affect the market price of our common stock.
Our investments in certain securities expose us to market risks.
We invest excess cash in marketable securities consisting primarily of commercial paper, corporate notes, corporate bonds and governmental securities. We also hold as strategic investments the common stock of two publicly-traded Japanese companies, one of which is Nihon Inter Electronics Corporation. The value of certain of these investments is subject to market fluctuations, which, if adverse, could have a material adverse effect on our operating results and financial condition.
Our products may be found to be defective, claims may be asserted against us and we may not have sufficient insurance.
One or more of our products may be found to be defective after we have already shipped the products in volume, requiring a product replacement or recall. We may also be subject to product returns that could impose substantial costs and have a material and adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Product liability or commercial claims may be asserted with respect to our products. Although we currently have product liability or commercial insurance for certain types of losses, we cannot assure you that we have obtained sufficient insurance coverage for all types of commercial or other losses, that we will have sufficient insurance coverage in the future or that we will have sufficient resources to satisfy any claims.
Large potential environmental liabilities, including those relating to a former operating subsidiary, may adversely impact our financial position.
Federal, state, foreign and local laws and regulations impose various restrictions and controls on the discharge of materials, chemicals and gases used in our semiconductor manufacturing processes. In addition, under some laws and regulations, we could be held financially responsible for remedial measures if our properties are contaminated or if we send waste to a landfill or recycling facility that becomes contaminated, even if we did not cause the contamination. Also, we may be subject to common law claims if we release substances that damage or harm third parties. Further, we cannot assure you that changes in environmental laws or regulations will not require additional investments in capital equipment or the implementation of additional compliance programs in the future. Any failure to comply with environmental laws or regulations could subject us to serious liabilities and could have a material adverse effect on our operating results and financial condition.
Some of our facilities are located near major earthquake fault lines.
Our corporate headquarters, one of our manufacturing facility, one of our research facility and certain other critical business operations are located near major earthquake fault lines. We could be materially and adversely affected in the event of a major earthquake. Although we maintain earthquake insurance, we can give you no assurance that we have obtained or will maintain sufficient insurance coverage.
There can be no assurance that we will have sufficient capital resources to make necessary investments in manufacturing technology and equipment.
The semiconductor industry is capital intensive. Semiconductor manufacturing requires a constant upgrading of process technology to remain competitive, as new and enhanced semiconductor processes are developed which permit smaller, more efficient and more powerful semiconductor devices. We maintain certain of our own manufacturing, assembly and test facilities, which have required and will continue to require significant investments in manufacturing technology and equipment. There can be no assurance that
47
we will have sufficient capital resources to make necessary investments in manufacturing technology and equipment. Although we believe that anticipated cash flows from operations, existing cash reserves and other equity or debt financings that we may obtain will be sufficient to satisfy our future capital expenditure requirements, there can be no assurance that this will be the case or that alternative sources of capital will be available to us on favorable terms or at all.
Final outcomes from the various tax authorities audits are difficult to predict and an unfavorable finding may negatively impact our financial results.
As is common with corporations of our size, we are from time to time under audit by various taxing authorities. It is often difficult to predict the final outcome or the timing of resolution of any particular tax matter. We have provided certain tax reserves which have been included in the determination of our financial results. However, unpredicted unfavorable settlement may require additional use of cash and negatively impact our financial position or results of operations.
Adoption of SFAS No. 123R, Share-Based Payment, may have a material adverse impact on our results of operations.
We provide equity-based compensation including employee stock options under our employee compensation programs. Under SFAS No. 123R that becomes effective for us beginning in fiscal July 2005, we will be required to expense certain equity-based awards over their vesting periods. Although there will be no impact on our equity-based awards outstanding as of April 18, 2005, whose vesting was accelerated on April 18, 2005, the expense associated with awards granted after that date may have a material adverse impact on our results of operations depending on the number of unvested awards granted or outstanding at the time of SFAS No. 123R adoption.
Compliance with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
We are scheduled to complete compliance with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 based on the close of our 2005 fiscal year at the end of June 2005. Although we do not foresee material delay or weakness, if there are any delays in or exceptions to the confirmation by us or our independent registered public accounting firm of our assessment of our internal control over financial reporting under Section 404, we could experience an adverse cost and market impact.
Terrorist attacks, such as those that took place on September 11, 2001, or threats or occurrences of other terrorist activities whether in the United States or internationally may affect the markets in which our common stock trades, the markets in which we operate and our profitability.
Terrorist attacks, such as those that took place on September 11, 2001, or threats or occurrences of other terrorist or related activities, whether in the United States or internationally, may affect the markets in which our common stock trades, the markets in which we operate and our profitability. Future terrorist or related activities could affect our domestic and international sales, disrupt our supply chains and impair our ability to produce and deliver our products. Such activities could affect our physical facilities or those of our suppliers or customers, and make transportation of our supplies and products more difficult or cost prohibitive. Due to the broad and uncertain effects that terrorist attacks have had on financial and economic markets generally, we cannot provide any estimate of how these activities might affect our future results.
48
ITEM 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
We are exposed to various risks, including fluctuations in interest and foreign currency rates. In the normal course of business, we also face risks that are either non-financial or non-quantifiable. Such risks principally include country risk, credit risk and legal risk and are not discussed or quantified in the following analyses, as well as risks set forth under the heading Factors that May Affect Future Results above.
Interest Rate Risk
Our financial assets and liabilities subject to interest rate risk are cash investments, convertible debt, credit facilities and interest rate swaps. Our primary objective is to preserve principal while maximizing yield without significantly increasing risk. At March 31, 2005, we evaluated the effect that near-term changes in interest rates would have had on these transactions. A change of as much as ten percent in the London InterBank Offered Rate (LIBOR) would have had a favorable impact of approximately $0.2 million on net interest income/expense for the current quarter since the interest income on our cash and cash investments would have outweighed additional interest expense on our outstanding debt. For our interest rate contract with Lehman Brothers, an increase of ten percent in interest rates would have had a favorable impact of $0.4 million, and a decrease of ten percent in interest rates would have had an adverse impact of ($0.2) million, on net interest income/expense. These changes would not have had a material impact on our results of operations, financial position or cash flows.
In December 2001, we entered into an interest rate swap transaction (the Transaction) with JP Morgan Chase Bank (the Bank), to modify our effective interest payable with respect to $412.5 million of our $550 million outstanding convertible debt (the Debt) (see Notes 4, Derivative Financial Instruments, and 8, Bank Loans and Long-Term Debt). At the inception of the Transaction, interest rates were lower than that of the Debt and we believed that interest rates would remain lower for an extended period of time. In April 2004, we entered into an interest rate swap transaction (the April 2004 Transaction) with the Bank to modify the effective interest payable with respect to the remaining $137.5 million of the Debt. The variable interest rate we have paid since the inception of the swap has averaged 2.39 percent, compared to a coupon of 4.25 percent on the Debt. This arrangement reduced interest expense by $2.6 million and $3.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively, and $7.3 million and $9.3 million for the nine months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively.
As discussed in Note 4 of the unaudited consolidated financial statements, we are required to obtain irrevocable standby letters of credit in favor of JP Morgan Chase Bank, for $7.5 million plus the collateral requirement for the interest rate swap transactions, as determined periodically. At March 31, 2005, $12.0 million in letters of credit were outstanding related to the transactions. The collateral requirement of the transactions may be adversely affected by an increase in the five-year LIBOR curve, a decrease in our stock price, or both. We cannot predict what the collateral requirement of the transactions and the letter of credit requirement will be over time. To illustrate the potential impact, had a 10 percent increase in the five-year LIBOR curve and a 10 percent decrease in our stock price occurred at the close of the fiscal quarter, our letter of credit commitment would have remained $12.0 million.
49
Accounted for as fair value hedges under SFAS No. 133, the mark-to-market adjustments of the Transaction and the April 2004 Transaction were offset by the mark-to-market adjustments on the Debt, resulting in no material impact to earnings. To measure the effectiveness of the hedge relationship, we used a regression analysis. To evaluate the relationship of the fair value of the two transactions and the changes in fair value of the Debt attributable to changes in the benchmark rate, we discounted the estimated cash flows by the LIBOR swap rate that corresponds to the Debts expected maturity date. In addition, our ability to call the Debt was considered in assessing the effectiveness of the hedging relationship. For those years that were projected to include at least a portion of redemption of the convertible debentures, we employed a valuation model known as a Monte Carlo simulation. This simulation allowed us to project probability-weighted contractual cash flows discounted at the LIBOR swap rate that corresponded to the Debts expected maturity date. The market value of the Transaction was $0.9 million liability at March 31, 2005, and $13.1 million asset at June 30, 2004. The market value of the April 2004 Transaction was $3.3 million and $1.3 million liability at March 31, 2005 and June 30, 2004, respectively.
In April 2002, we entered into an interest rate contract (the Contract) with an investment bank, Lehman Brothers (Lehman), to reduce the variable interest rate risk of the Transaction. The notional amount of the Contract is $412.0 million, representing approximately 75 percent of the Debt. Under the terms of the Contract, we have the option to receive a payout from Lehman covering our exposure to LIBOR fluctuations between 5.5 percent and 7.5 percent for any four designated quarters. The market value of the Contract at March 31, 2005 and June 30, 2004, was $0.5 million and $0.9 million, respectively, and was included in other long-term assets. Mark-to-market gains (losses) of $0.2 million and ($0.6) million, for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively, and ($0.4) million and ($0.4) million for the nine months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively, were charged to interest expense.
Foreign Currency Risk
We conduct business on a global basis in several foreign currencies, and at various times, we have currency exposure related to the British Pound Sterling, the Euro and the Japanese Yen. Our risk to the European currencies is partially offset by the natural hedge of manufacturing and selling goods in both U.S. dollars and the European currencies. Considering our specific foreign currency exposures, we have the greatest exposure to the Japanese Yen, since we have significant Yen-based revenues without Yen-based manufacturing costs. We have established a foreign currency hedging program using foreign exchange forward contracts, including the Forward Contract described below, to hedge certain foreign currency transaction exposures. To protect against reductions in value and volatility of future cash flows caused by changes in currency exchange rates, we have established revenue, expense and balance sheet hedging programs. Currency forward contracts and local Yen and Euro borrowings are used in these hedging programs. Our hedging programs reduce, but do not always eliminate, the impact of currency exchange rate movements. We considered an adverse near-term change in exchange rates of ten percent for the British Pound Sterling, the Euro and the Japanese Yen. Such a change, after taking into account our derivative financial instruments and offsetting positions, would have resulted in an annualized adverse impact on income before taxes of less than $1 million for the three and Nine months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004.
50
In March 2001, we entered into a five-year foreign exchange forward contract (the Forward Contract) for the purpose of reducing the effect of exchange rate fluctuations on forecasted intercompany purchases by our subsidiary in Japan. We have designated the Forward Contract as a cash flow hedge under which mark-to-market adjustments are recorded in other comprehensive income, a separate component of stockholders equity, until the forecasted transactions are recorded in earnings. Under the terms of the Forward Contract, we are required to exchange 1.2 billion Yen for $11.0 million on a quarterly basis from June 2001 to March 2006. At March 31, 2005, four quarterly payments of 1.2 billion Yen remained to be swapped at a forward exchange rate of 109.32 Yen per U.S. dollar. The market value of the forward contract was a liability of $1.8 million and $2.2 million at March 31, 2005 and June 30, 2004, respectively. Mark-to-market gains (losses), included in other comprehensive income, net of tax, were $1.8 million and ($0.7) million for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively, and ($0.3) million and ($6.9) million for the nine months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively. At March 31, 2005, based on effectiveness tests comparing forecasted transactions through the Forward Contract expiration date to its cash flow requirements, we do not expect to incur a material charge to income during the next twelve months as a result of the Forward Contract.
We had approximately $101.9 million and $62.4 million in notional amounts of forward contracts not designated as accounting hedges at March 31, 2005 and June 30, 2004, respectively. Net unrealized and realized exchange gains (losses) recognized in earnings were less than $1 million for the three and nine months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004.
51
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
(a) Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures
The term disclosure controls and procedures refers to the controls and other procedures of a company that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the company in the reports that it files under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Exchange Act) is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within required time periods. The Companys management, with the participation of the Companys Chief Executive Officer, Alexander Lidow, and Chief Financial Officer, Michael P. McGee, carried out an evaluation of the effectiveness of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(b). Based on that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer believe that, as of the end of the period covered by this report, such controls and procedures are effective in making known to them material information related to the Company (including its consolidated subsidiaries) required to be included in this report.
Disclosure controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and implemented, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving an entitys disclosure objectives. The likelihood of achieving such objectives is affected by limitations inherent in disclosure controls and procedures. These include the fact that human judgment in decision-making can be faulty and that breakdowns in internal control can occur because of human failures such as simple errors, mistakes or intentional circumvention of the established processes.
(b) Changes in internal controls
There was no significant change in our internal controls during the quarter ended March 31, 2005, that has materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Companys internal controls over financial reporting.
52
ITEM 6. Exhibits
Index: |
|
|
|
|
|
3.1 |
|
Certificate of Incorporation, as amended to date (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Companys Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed with the Commission on July 19, 2004; Registration No. 333-117489) |
|
|
|
3.2 |
|
Bylaws, as amended to date (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Companys Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed with the Commission on July 19, 2004, Registration No. 333-117489) |
|
|
|
11.1 |
|
Statement Regarding Computation of Per Share Earnings (incorporated by reference to Note 2, Net Income Per Common Share, of the Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements contained herein) |
|
|
|
31.1 |
|
Certification Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
|
|
31.2 |
|
Certification Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
|
|
32.1 |
|
Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
|
|
32.2 |
|
Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
53
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
INTERNATIONAL RECTIFIER CORPORATION
Registrant
May 13, 2005 |
/s/ MICHAEL P. MCGEE |
|
|
Michael P. McGee |
|
|
Executive Vice President, |
|
|
Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
(Duly authorized
officer and |
54