SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
ý |
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
|
|
|
For the Quarterly Period Ended March 31, 2005 |
|
|
o |
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
|
|
|
Commission File No. 0-31525 |
COMMUNITY VALLEY BANCORP
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
California |
|
68-0479553 |
(State or other jurisdiction of |
|
(IRS Employer ID Number) |
|
|
|
2041 Forest Avenue, Chico, California |
|
95928 |
(Address of principal executive offices) |
|
(Zip code) |
(530) 899-2344
(Registrants telephone number,
including area code)
not applicable
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed
since last report.)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes ý No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 12-b-2)
Yes o No ý
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date:
No par value Common Stock 3,655,124 shares outstanding at April 30, 2005.
PART 1-FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
COMMUNITY VALLEY BANCORP
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET (Unaudited)
(In thousands, except share amounts) |
|
March 31, |
|
December 31, |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Cash and due from banks |
|
$ |
21,557 |
|
$ |
21,778 |
|
Federal funds sold |
|
43,905 |
|
46,440 |
|
||
Total cash and cash equivalents |
|
65,462 |
|
68,218 |
|
||
Interest-bearing deposits in banks |
|
8,814 |
|
8,715 |
|
||
Investment securities (market value of $8,764 at March 31, 2005 and $6,963 at December 31, 2004) |
|
8,798 |
|
6,961 |
|
||
Loans held for sale, at lower of cost or market |
|
3,477 |
|
1,490 |
|
||
Loans, less allowance for loan losses of $4,605 at March 31, 2005 and $4,381 at December 31, 2004 |
|
344,324 |
|
339,174 |
|
||
Bank premises and equipment, net |
|
9,201 |
|
9,027 |
|
||
Accrued interest receivable and other assets |
|
18,637 |
|
16,091 |
|
||
Total Assets |
|
$ |
458,713 |
|
$ |
449,676 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Deposits: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Non-interest bearing |
|
$ |
88,732 |
|
$ |
80,793 |
|
Interest bearing |
|
318,108 |
|
318,266 |
|
||
Total deposits |
|
406,840 |
|
399,059 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Employee stock ownership plan (ESOP) note payable |
|
800 |
|
833 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Junior subordinated debentures |
|
8,248 |
|
8,248 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Accrued interest payable and other liabilities |
|
6,919 |
|
7,005 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Total liabilities |
|
422,807 |
|
415,145 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Commitments and contingencies |
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Shareholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Common stock no par value; 20,000,000 shares authorized; issued and outstanding 3,650,179 Shares at March 31, 2005 and 3,636,791 shares at December 31, 2004 |
|
8,066 |
|
7,861 |
|
||
Unallocated ESOP shares (88,015 shares at March 31, 2005 and 89,642 shares at December 31, 2004, at cost) |
|
(1,126 |
) |
(1,144 |
) |
||
Retained earnings |
|
28,982 |
|
27,802 |
|
||
Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income, net o taxes |
|
(16 |
) |
12 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Total shareholders equity |
|
35,906 |
|
34,531 |
|
||
Total liabilities and shareholders equity |
|
$ |
458,713 |
|
$ |
449,676 |
|
See Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements |
|
|
|
|
|
2
COMMUNITY VALLEY BANCORP
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENT OF INCOME
(Unaudited)
|
|
For the 3 months ended March 31, |
|
||||
(In thousands, except per share data) |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Interest income: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Interest and fees on loans |
|
$ |
6,688 |
|
$ |
5,357 |
|
Interest on Federal funds sold |
|
232 |
|
122 |
|
||
Interest on deposits in banks |
|
60 |
|
58 |
|
||
Interest on investment securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Taxable |
|
47 |
|
28 |
|
||
Exempt from Federal income taxes |
|
25 |
|
10 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Total interest income |
|
7,052 |
|
5,575 |
|
||
Interest expense: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Interest on deposits |
|
1,003 |
|
878 |
|
||
Interest junior subordinated debentures |
|
131 |
|
101 |
|
||
Interest on ESOP note payable |
|
11 |
|
9 |
|
||
Total interest expense |
|
1,145 |
|
988 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Net interest income before provision for loan losses |
|
5,907 |
|
4,587 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Provision for loan losses |
|
225 |
|
225 |
|
||
Net interest income after provision for loan losses |
|
5,682 |
|
4,362 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Non-interest income |
|
1,636 |
|
1,229 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Non-interest expense: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Salaries and employee benefits |
|
3,036 |
|
2,279 |
|
||
Occupancy |
|
281 |
|
239 |
|
||
Furniture and equipment |
|
391 |
|
373 |
|
||
Other |
|
1,166 |
|
896 |
|
||
Total non-interest expense |
|
4,874 |
|
3,787 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Income before provision for income taxes |
|
2,444 |
|
1,804 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Provision for income taxes |
|
990 |
|
716 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Net income |
|
$ |
1,454 |
|
$ |
1,088 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Basic earnings per share |
|
$ |
.41 |
|
$ |
.31 |
|
Diluted earnings per share |
|
$ |
.38 |
|
$ |
.29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Cash dividends per share of issued and outstanding common stock |
|
$ |
.075 |
|
$ |
.075 |
|
INCLUDE PROFORMA EPS FOR STOCK SPLITAND REF TO FOOTNOTE
See Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
3
COMMUNITY VALLEY BANCORP
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
(Unaudited)
(In thousands except share amounts)
|
|
Common Stock |
|
Unallocated |
|
Retained |
|
Accumulated |
|
Shareholders |
|
Comprehensive |
|
||||||||
|
|
Shares |
|
Amount |
|
Shares |
|
Earnings |
|
Income (loss) |
|
Equity |
|
Income |
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Balance, January 1, 2004 |
|
3,621,824 |
|
$ |
7,271 |
|
$ |
(1,070 |
) |
$ |
23,746 |
|
$ |
2 |
|
$ |
29,949 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Comprehensive income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,609 |
|
|
|
5,609 |
|
$ |
5,609 |
|
|||||
Other comprehensive income net of taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Net change in unrealized gains on available-for-sale investment securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
10 |
|
10 |
|
10 |
|
|||||
Total comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
5,619 |
|
|||||
Exercise of stock options and related tax benefit |
|
34,202 |
|
532 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
532 |
|
|
|
||||||
Amortization of stock compensation - ESOP shares |
|
|
|
104 |
|
76 |
|
|
|
|
|
180 |
|
|
|
||||||
Shares acquired or redeemed by ESOP |
|
|
|
|
|
(150 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(150 |
) |
|
|
||||||
Cash dividends- $.30 per share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,091 |
) |
|
|
(1,091 |
) |
|
|
||||||
Cash in lieu of fractional shares in four-for-three stock split |
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
||||||
Repurchase and retirement of common stock |
|
(19,235 |
) |
(40 |
) |
|
|
(462 |
) |
|
|
(502 |
) |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Balance, December 31, 2004 |
|
3,636,791 |
|
7,861 |
|
(1,144 |
) |
27,802 |
|
12 |
|
34,531 |
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Comprehensive income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,454 |
|
|
|
1,454 |
|
$ |
1,454 |
|
|||||
Other comprehensive loss, net of taxes: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Net change in unrealized loss on available-for-sale investment securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(28 |
) |
(28 |
) |
(28 |
) |
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Total comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,426 |
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Exercise of stock options and related tax benefit |
|
13,388 |
|
177 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
177 |
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Amortization of stock compensation - ESOP shares |
|
|
|
28 |
|
18 |
|
|
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Cash dividends - $.075 per share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(274 |
) |
|
|
(274 |
) |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Balance, March 31, 2005 |
|
3,650,179 |
|
$ |
8,066 |
|
$ |
(1,126 |
) |
$ |
28,982 |
|
$ |
(16 |
) |
$ |
35,906 |
|
|
|
See Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
4
COMMUNITY VALLEY BANCORP
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
||
For the three months ended March 31, |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Cash flows from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Net income |
|
$ |
1,454 |
|
$ |
1,088 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash (used in) provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Provision for loan losses |
|
225 |
|
225 |
|
||
Decrease in deferred loan origination fees, net |
|
(182 |
) |
(126 |
) |
||
Depreciation, amortization and accretion, net |
|
296 |
|
312 |
|
||
Net increase in loans held for sale |
|
(1,987 |
) |
(1,180 |
) |
||
Increase in cash surrender value of life insurance policies |
|
(68 |
) |
(19 |
) |
||
Non-cash compensation associated with the ESOP |
|
46 |
|
45 |
|
||
(Increase) decrease in accrued interest receivable and other assets |
|
(909 |
) |
1,359 |
|
||
(Decrease) increase in accrued interest payable and other liabilities |
|
(105 |
) |
583 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities |
|
(1,231 |
) |
2,287 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Net increase in interest-bearing deposits in banks |
|
(99 |
) |
(692 |
) |
||
Proceeds from called available-for-sale investment securities |
|
|
|
300 |
|
||
Proceeds from matured or called held-to-maturity investment securities |
|
115 |
|
250 |
|
||
Purchases of available-for-sale investment Securities |
|
(999 |
) |
|
|
||
Purchases of held-to-maturity investment Securities |
|
(995 |
) |
(927 |
) |
||
Premiums paid for life insurance policies |
|
(1,450 |
) |
|
|
||
Purchases of premises and equipment |
|
(500 |
) |
(574 |
) |
||
Net increase in loans |
|
(5,193 |
) |
(9,707 |
) |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
(9,121 |
) |
(11,350 |
) |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Net increase in demand, interest-bearing and savings deposits |
|
$ |
12,760 |
|
$ |
9,374 |
|
Net increase in time deposits |
|
(4,960 |
) |
(50 |
) |
||
Repayments of ESOP note payable |
|
(33 |
) |
(36 |
) |
||
Payment of cash dividends |
|
(273 |
) |
(278 |
) |
||
Proceeds from exercise of stock options |
|
101 |
|
135 |
|
||
Purchase of unallocated ESOP shares |
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Net cash provided by financing activities |
|
7,595 |
|
9,145 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
(Decrease) Increase in cash and cash equivalents |
|
(2,757 |
) |
82 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year |
|
68,218 |
|
76,810 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
|
$ |
65,462 |
|
$ |
76,892 |
|
See Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
5
Community Valley Bancorp and Subsidiaries
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1. BASIS OF PRESENTATION
The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements of Community Valley Bancorp and subsidiaries (the Company) have been prepared pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities Exchange Commission (the SEC) and the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, certain information and footnote disclosures required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for annual financial statements are not include herein. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (which consist solely of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for a fair presentation of the results for the interim periods presented have been included. These interim consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and related notes contained in the Companys 2004 Annual Report to Shareholders on Form 10-K.
The condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly owned subsidiaries, Butte Community Bank and CVB Insurance Agency, LLC. All significant inter-company balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. The Company has also established a wholly-owned unconsolidated subsidiary, Community Valley Bancorp Trust I (the Trust), a Delaware statutory business trust, for the purpose of issuing trust preferred securities. The results of operations for the three-month period ended March 31, 2005 may not necessarily be indicative of the operating results for the full year 2005.
Management has determined that since all of the commercial banking products and services offered by the Company are available in each branch of the bank, all branches are located within the same economic environment and management does not allocate resources based on the performance of different lending or transaction activities, it is appropriate to aggregate the Bank branches and report them as a single operating segment.
The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions. These estimates and assumptions affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from these estimates.
2. SUBSEQUENT EVENT
On April 13, 2005, the Board of Directors of the Company declared a two-for-one stock split effective May 16, 2005 for shareholders of record on May 2, 2005. Share and per share information has not been retroactively adjusted to reflect the stock split except for the pro forma basic and diluted earnings per share included in the condensed consolidated statement of income.
2. EARNINGS PER SHARE COMPUTATION
Basic earnings per share are computed by dividing net income by the weighted average common shares outstanding for the period (3,554,987 shares for the three month period ended March 31, 2005 and 3,540,713 shares for the three month period ended March 31, 2004). Diluted earnings per share reflect the potential dilution that could occur if outstanding stock options were exercised using the treasury stock method. Diluted earnings per share is computed by dividing net income by the weighted average common shares outstanding for the period plus the dilutive effect of options (238,088 shares for the three-month period ended March 31, 2005 and 271,007 shares for the three-month period ended March 31, 2004). During the periods covered the Company had no stock options th at were considered anti-dilutive.
6
3. COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
Comprehensive income is reported in addition to net income for all periods presented. Comprehensive income is made up of net income plus other comprehensive income or loss. The Companys only source of comprehensive income or loss, is comprised of changes in unrealized gains or losses, net of taxes, on available-for-sale securities, adjusted for the effect of realized gains or losses on available-for-sale securities, net of taxes.
4. STOCKBASED COMPENSATION
The Company issues stock options under three stock-based compensation plans, the Community Valley Bancorp 1991, 1997 and 2000 Stock Option Plans. The Company accounts for these plans under the recognition and measurement principles of APB Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, and related Interpretations. No stock-based compensation cost is reflected in net income, as all options granted under these plans had an exercise price equal to the market value of the underlying common stock on the date of grant.
The following table illustrates the effect on net income and earnings per share if the Company had applied the fair value recognition provisions of FASB Statement No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, to stock-based employee compensation.
Pro forma adjustments to the Companys consolidated net earnings and earnings per share are disclosed during the periods in which the options become vested.
(In thousands, except share data) |
|
March 31, 2005 |
|
March 31, 2004 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Net earnings as reported |
|
$ |
1,454 |
|
$ |
1,088 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Deduct: Total stock-based compensation expense determined under the fair value based method for all awards, net of related tax effects |
|
(87 |
) |
(71 |
) |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Pro forma net income |
|
$ |
(1,367 |
) |
$ |
(1,017 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Basic earnings per share - as reported |
|
$ |
0.41 |
|
$ |
0.31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Basic earnings per share - pro forma |
|
$ |
0.38 |
|
$ |
0.29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Diluted earnings per share - as reported |
|
$ |
0.38 |
|
$ |
0.29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Diluted earnings per share - pro forma |
|
$ |
0.36 |
|
$ |
0.27 |
|
7
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
||||
|
|
March 31, 2005 |
|
March 31, 2004 |
|
||
Dividend yield (not applicable) |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Expected volatility |
|
41.00 |
% |
95.16 |
% |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Risk-free interest rate |
|
4.00 |
% |
4.52 |
% |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Expected option life |
|
10 years |
|
10 years |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Weighted average fair value of options granted during the year |
|
$ |
7.069.51 |
|
$ |
9.86 |
|
5. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
NEED TO INCLUDE AS FOOTNOTE
6. NEW ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
Share-Based Payments font>
In December 2004 the FASB issued Statement Number 123 (revised 2004) (FAS 123 (R)), Share-Based Payments. FAS 123 (R) requires all entities to recognize compensation expense in an amount equal to the fair value of share-based payments such as stock options granted to employees. In April 2005, the Securities and Exchange Commission adopted a rule that defers the compliance date of FAS 123(R) from the first reporting period beginning after June 15, 2005 to the first fiscal year beginning after June 15, 2005, January 1, 2006 for the Company. Management has not completed its evaluation of the effect that FAS 123 (R) will have, but believes that the effect will be consistent with its previous pro forma disclosures.
8
Item 2. MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS OF COMMUNITY VALLEY BANCORP
The following is Community Valley Bancorps (the Company) managements discussion and analysis of the significant changes in balance sheet accounts for March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004 and income and expense accounts for the three-month period ended March 31, 2005 and 2004. The discussion is designed to provide a better understanding of significant trends related to the Companys financial condition, results of operations, liquidity, capital resources and interest rate sensitivity.
In addition to the historical information contained herein, this report on Form 10-Q contains certain forward-looking statements. The reader of this report should understand that all such forward-looking statements are subject to various uncertainties and risks that could affect their outcome. The Companys actual results could differ materially from those suggested by such forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause or contribute to such differences include, but are not limited to, variances in the actual versus projected growth in assets, return on assets, loan losses, expenses, rates charged on loans and earned on securities investments, rates paid on deposits, competition effects, fee and other noninterest income earned, general economic conditions, nationally, regionally and in the operating market areas of the Company and its s ubsidiaries, changes in the regulatory environment, changes in business conditions and inflation, changes in securities markets, data processing problems, a decline in real estate values in the Companys market area, the effects of terrorism, including the events of September 11, 2001 and thereafter, and the conduct of the war on terrorism by the United States and its allies, as well as other factors. This entire report should be read putting such forward-looking statements in context.
General Development of Business
The Company is a financial holding company (FHC) registered and authorized to engage in the activities permitted under the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, as amended. The Company was incorporated under the laws of the State of California in 2002 and elected to change to a FHC in 2004. As a financial holding company, the Company is subject to the Federal Holding Company Act and to supervision by the board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (FRB). Its principal office is located at 2041 Forest Avenue, Chico, California 95928 and its telephone number is (530) 899-2344.
The Company owns 100% of the issued and outstanding common shares of Butte Community Bank. Butte Community Bank was incorporated and commenced business in Paradise and Oroville, California in 1990. Butte Community Bank operates twelve full service offices within its service areas of Butte, Sutter, Yuba, Tehama, and Colusa Counties. The Bank also maintains Loan Production Offices in Citrus Heights and Redding. Butte Community Banks primary business is serving the commercial banking needs of small to mid-sized businesses and consumers within those counties. Butte Community Bank accepts checking and savings deposits, offers money market deposit accounts and certificates of deposit, makes secured and unsecured commercial, secured real estate, and other installment and term loans and offers other customary banking services.
On December 19, 2002, the Company formed a wholly-owned unconsolidated subsidiary, Community Valley Bancorp Trust I (the Trust), a Delaware statutory business trust, for the purpose of issuing trust preferred securities.
On December 1, 2004, the Company formed a wholly-owned subsidiary, CVB Insurance Agency LLC for the purpose of providing insurance related services.
Critical Accounting Policies
General
The Companys significant accounting principles are described in Note 1 of the consolidated financial statements in the Companys 2004 Annual Report to Shareholders on Form 10-K and are essential to understanding
9
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Results of Operations and Financial Condition. Community Valley Bancorps annual consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP). The financial information contained within our statements is, to a significant extent, financial information that is based on measures of the financial effects of transactions and events that have already occurred. Some of the Companys accounting principles require significant judgment to estimate values of assets or liabilities. In addition, certain accounting principles require significant judgment in applying the complex accounting principles to transactions to determine the most appropriate treatment. The following is a summary of the more judgmental and complex accounting estimates and principles.
Allowance for Loan Losses (ALL)
The allowance for loan losses is managements best estimate of the probable losses that may be sustained in our loan portfolio. The allowance is based on two basic principles of accounting: (1) SFAS No.5 which requires that losses be accrued when they are probable of occurring and estimable and (2) SFAS No. 114, which requires that losses be accrued on impaired loans based on the differences between the value of collateral, present value of future cash flows or values that are observable in the secondary market and the loan balance. The Company performs periodic and systematic detailed evaluations of its lending portfolio to identify and estimate the inherent risks and assess the overall collectibility. These evaluations include general conditions such as the portfolio composition, size and maturities of various segmented portions of the portfolio such as secured, unsecured, construction, and Small Business Administration (SBA).
Additional factors include concentrations of borrowers, industries, geographical sectors, loan product, loan classes and collateral types, volume and trends of loan delinquencies and non-accrual, criticized and classified assets and trends in the aggregate in significant credits identified as watch list items. There are several components to the determination of the adequacy of the ALL. Each of these components is determined based upon estimates that can and do change when the actual events occur. The Company estimates the SFAS No. 5 portion of the ALL based on the segmentation of its portfolio. For those segments that require an ALL, the Company estimates loan losses on a monthly basis based upon its ongoing loan review process and analysis of loan performance. The Company follows a systematic and consistently applied approach to select the most appropriate loss measurement methods and support its conclusions and rationale with written documentation. One method of estimating loan losses for groups of loans is through the application of loss rates to the groups aggregate loan balances. Such rates typically reflect historical loss experience for each group of loans, adjusted for relevant economic factors over a defined period of time. The Company evaluates and modifies its loss estimation model as needed to ensure that the resulting loss estimate is consistent with GAAP.
For individually impaired loans, SFAS No. 114 provides guidance on the acceptable methods to measure impairment. Specifically, SFAS No. 114 states that when a loan is impaired, the Company should measure impairment based on the present value of expected future principal and interest cash flows discounted at the loans effective interest rate, except that as a practical expedient, a creditor may measure impairment based on a loans observable market price or the fair value of collateral, if the loan is collateral dependent. When developing the estimate of future cash flows for a loan, the Company considers all available information reflecting past events and current conditions, including the effect of existing environmental factors.
Loan Sales and Servicing
The Company originates government guaranteed loans and mortgage loans that may be sold in the secondary market. The amounts of gains recorded on sales of loans and the initial recording of servicing assets and interest only (I/O) strips is based on the estimated fair values of the respective components. In recording the initial value of the servicing assets and the fair value of the I/O strips receivable, the Company uses estimates which are based on managements expectations of future prepayments and discount rates. Servicing assets are amortized
10
over the estimated life of the related loan. I/O strips are not significant at March 31, 2005. These prepayment and discount rates were based on current market conditions and historical performance of the various pools of serviced loans. If actual prepayments with respect to sold loans occur more quickly than projected the carrying value of the servicing assets may have to be adjusted through a charge to earnings.
Stock-Based Compensation
The Company uses the intrinsic value based method for measuring compensation cost related to stock options. Under the intrinsic value based method, compensation cost is the excess, if any, of the quoted market price of the stock at grant date over the amount an employee must pay to acquire the stock. This cost is amortized on a straight-line basis over the vesting period of the options granted. The Company applies Accounting Principles Board Opinion (APB) No. 25 Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees and related interpretations in accounting for stock options. No compensation cost has been recorded in the accompanying financial statements because all options have been granted at an exercise price of no less than the fair market value at date of grant.
Revenue recognition
The Companys primary source of revenue is interest income, which is the difference between the interest income it receives on interest-earning assets and the interest expense it pays on interest-bearing liabilities, and (ii) fee income, which includes fees earned on deposit services, income from SBA lending, electronic-based cash management services, mortgage brokerage fee income and merchant credit card processing services. Interest income is recorded on an accrual basis. Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in the Companys 2004 Annual Report to Shareholders on Form 10-K offers an explanation of the process for determining when the accrual of interest income is discontinued on an impaired loan.
Income Taxes
The Company accounts for income taxes under the asset and liability method. Under the asset and liability method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using currently enacted tax rates applied to such taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date. If future income should prove non-existent or less than the amount of deferred tax assets within the tax years to which they may be applied, the asset may not be realized and our net income will be reduced.
Stock Split
On April 13, 2005, the Board of Directors of the Company declared a two-for-one stock split effective May 16, 2005 for shareholders of record on May 2, 2005. Share and per share information has not been retroactively adjusted to reflect the stock split except for the pro forma basic and diluted earnings per share included in the condensed consolidated statement of income.
Overview
The Company recorded net income of $1,454,000 for the quarter ended March 31, 2005, which was a 34% increase from the $1,088,000 reported for the same period of 2004. Diluted earnings per share for the first quarter of 2005 were $0.38, compared to the $0.29 recorded in the first quarter of 2004. The annualized return on average equity (ROAE) and the annualized return on average assets (ROA) for the first quarter of 2005 were 16.61% and 1.31%, respectively, as compared to 14.13% and 1.12%, respectively, for the same period in 2004. The primary reason for the increase in income was due to significant growth in earning assets. Total assets of the Company increased by $9,038,000 or (2.0%) from December 31, 2004 to $458,700,000 at March 31, 2005. ; Net loans totaled $347,801,000, up $7,137,000 (2.1%) from the ending balances on December 31, 2004. Deposit balances at March 31, 2005 totaled $406,840,000 up $7,781,000 (1.9%) from December 31, 2004.
11
Table One below provides a summary of the components of net income for the periods indicated:
Table One: Components of Net Income
|
|
Three months ended |
|
||||
(In thousands, except percentages) |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Net interest income |
|
$ |
5,907 |
|
$ |
4,587 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
(225 |
) |
(225 |
) |
||
Non-interest income |
|
1,636 |
|
1,229 |
|
||
Non-interest expense |
|
(4,874 |
) |
(3,787 |
) |
||
(Provision for) income taxes |
|
(990 |
) |
(716 |
) |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Net income |
|
$ |
1,454 |
|
$ |
1,088 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Average total assets (In millions) |
|
$ |
449.8 |
|
$ |
390.1 |
|
Net income (annualized) as a percentage of average total assets |
|
1.31 |
% |
1.12 |
% |
Results of Operations
Net interest income represents the excess of interest and fees earned on interest earning assets (loans, securities, federal funds sold and investments in time deposits) over the interest paid on deposits and borrowed funds. Net interest margin is net interest income expressed as a percentage of average earning assets.
The Companys net interest margin was 5.94% for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 5.40% for the three months ended March 31, 2004. Net interest income increased $1,318,000 (28.8%) for the first quarter of 2005 compared to the same period in 2004. The primary reason for this increase was the increase in average loans of $69,146,000 (24.8%) higher in the first quarter of 2005 versus the same period in 2004 resulting in increased interest income and fees associated with that growth.
Interest expense was $159,000 (16%) higher in the first quarter versus the same period in 2004. The average balances of interest bearing liabilities were $40,691,000 (14.2%) higher in the first quarter of 2005 versus the same quarter in 2004. Even though interest bearing balances increased, rates paid on these liabilities only increased by 4 basis points on a quarter over quarter basis.
Table Two, Analysis of Net Interest Margin on Earning Assets, and Table Three, Analysis of Volume and Rate Changes on Net Interest Income and Expenses, are provided to enable the reader to understand the components and past trends of the Companys interest income and expense. Table Two provides an analysis of net interest margin on earning assets setting forth average assets, liabilities and shareholders equity; interest income earned and interest expense paid and average rates earned and paid; and the net interest margin.
12
Table Two: Analysis of Net Interest Margin on Earning Assets
Three Months Ended March 31,
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
||||||||||||
(In thousands, except percentages) |
|
Avg |
|
Interest |
|
Avg |
|
Avg |
|
Interest |
|
Avg |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Earning assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Loans (1) |
|
$ |
348,003 |
|
$ |
6,688 |
|
7.79 |
% |
$ |
278,857 |
|
$ |
5,357 |
|
7.71 |
% |
Taxable investment Securities |
|
6,047 |
|
47 |
|
3.15 |
% |
3,277 |
|
28 |
|
3.43 |
% |
||||
Tax-exempt investment securities (2) |
|
2,041 |
|
25 |
|
4.97 |
% |
740 |
|
10 |
|
5.42 |
% |
||||
Federal funds sold |
|
38,069 |
|
232 |
|
2.47 |
% |
49,618 |
|
122 |
|
0.99 |
% |
||||
Interest bearing deposits in banks |
|
8,781 |
|
60 |
|
2.77 |
% |
8,247 |
|
58 |
|
2.82 |
% |
||||
Total earning assets |
|
402,941 |
|
$ |
7,052 |
|
7.10 |
% |
340,739 |
|
$ |
5,575 |
|
6.56 |
% |
||
Cash & due from banks |
|
12,751 |
|
|
|
|
|
13,202 |
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Other assets |
|
34,077 |
|
|
|
|
|
36,168 |
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Average total assets |
|
$ |
449,769 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
390,109 |
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Liabilities & Shareholders Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Interest bearing liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
NOW & MMDA |
|
$ |
180,901 |
|
$ |
270 |
|
0.61 |
% |
$ |
166,728 |
|
$ |
302 |
|
0.73 |
% |
Savings |
|
34,628 |
|
42 |
|
0.49 |
% |
25,894 |
|
32 |
|
.50 |
% |
||||
Time deposits |
|
102,249 |
|
693 |
|
2.75 |
% |
84,712 |
|
544 |
|
2.58 |
% |
||||
Other borrowings |
|
9,058 |
|
142 |
|
6.36 |
% |
8,811 |
|
110 |
|
5.01 |
% |
||||
Total interest bearing liabilities |
|
326,836 |
|
$ |
1,147 |
|
1.42 |
% |
286,145 |
|
$ |
988 |
|
1.38 |
% |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Demand deposits |
|
81,664 |
|
|
|
|
|
65,129 |
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Other liabilities |
|
5,775 |
|
|
|
|
|
8,045 |
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Total liabilities |
|
414,275 |
|
|
|
|
|
359,319 |
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Shareholders equity |
|
35,494 |
|
|
|
|
|
30,790 |
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Average liabilities and equity |
|
$ |
449.769 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
390,109 |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Net interest income & margin (3) |
|
|
|
5,905 |
|
5.94 |
% |
|
|
$ |
4,587 |
|
5.40 |
% |
(1) Loan interest includes loan fees of $616,000 and $532,000 during the three months ended March 31, 2005 and March 31, 2004, respectively.
(2) Does not include taxable-equivalent adjustments that primarily relate to income on certain securities that is exempt from federal income taxes.
(3) Net interest margin is computed by dividing net interest income by total average earning assets.
(4) Average yield is calculated based on actual days in quarter (90 for March 31, 2005 and 91 for March 31, 2004) and annualized to actual days in year (365 for 2005 and 366 for 2004).
13
Table Three sets forth a summary of the changes in interest income and interest expense from changes in average asset and liability balances (volume) and changes in average interest rates. On a quarter over quarter basis for the period ending March 31, 2005 net interest income has increased $1,318,000 over the same time period in 2004. Interest income from earning assets has increased by $1,147,000. Changes in the volume of earning assets, primarily loans, have resulted in an increase in interest income of $1,332,000 while interest income from changes in rates has decreased by $1,000. Changes in the volume of interest bearing liabilities, primarily the increase in balances of demand deposits and time deposits, has resulted in a net increase of interest expense of $159,000.
Table Three: Analysis of Volume and Rate Changes on Net Interest Income and Expenses
(In thousands) Three Months Ended March 31, 2005 over 2004
Increase (decrease) due to change in:
|
|
Volume |
|
Rate (3) |
|
Net Change |
|
|||
Interest-earning assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Net loans (1) |
|
$ |
1,332 |
|
$ |
(1 |
) |
$ |
1,331 |
|
Taxable investment securities |
|
24 |
|
(4 |
) |
20 |
|
|||
Tax exempt investment securities (2) |
|
18 |
|
(1 |
) |
17 |
|
|||
Federal funds sold |
|
(28 |
) |
138 |
|
110 |
|
|||
Interest bearing deposits in banks |
|
4 |
|
(2 |
) |
2 |
|
|||
Total |
|
1,349 |
|
130 |
|
1,479 |
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Interest-bearing liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
NOW and MMDA deposits |
|
26 |
|
(58 |
) |
(32 |
) |
|||
Savings deposits |
|
11 |
|
(1 |
) |
10 |
|
|||
Time deposits |
|
113 |
|
36 |
|
149 |
|
|||
Other borrowings |
|
3 |
|
29 |
|
32 |
|
|||
Total |
|
153 |
|
6 |
|
159 |
|
|||
Interest differential |
|
$ |
1,196 |
|
$ |
124 |
|
$ |
1,320 |
|
(1) The average balance of non-accruing loans is not significant as a percentage of total loans and is included in net loans.
(2) Does not include taxable-equivalent adjustments that primarily relate to income on certain securities that is exempt from federal income taxes.
(3) The rate/volume variance has been included in the rate variance.
14
Table Four below provides a summary of the components of noninterest income for the periods indicated (dollars in thousands):
Table Four: Components of Noninterest Income
Three Months Ended March 31,
|
|
2005 |
|
% of Avg. |
|
2004 |
|
% of Avg. |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Service charges on deposit accounts |
|
$ |
539 |
|
0.48 |
% |
$ |
453 |
|
0.47 |
% |
Loan servicing fees |
|
98 |
|
0.09 |
% |
92 |
|
0.09 |
% |
||
Fees - alternative investment sales |
|
159 |
|
0.14 |
% |
137 |
|
0.14 |
% |
||
Merchant fee income |
|
78 |
|
0.07 |
% |
84 |
|
0.09 |
% |
||
Gain on the sale of loans |
|
473 |
|
0.42 |
% |
246 |
|
0.25 |
% |
||
Other |
|
289 |
|
0.26 |
% |
217 |
|
0.22 |
% |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Total non-interest income |
|
$ |
1,636 |
|
1.45 |
% |
$ |
1,229 |
|
1.26 |
% |
Non-interest income was up $407,000 (33.1%) to $1,636,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2005 as compared to $1,229,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2004. Increases in non-interest income were realized in fees from service charges (up 19%), loan servicing fees (up 6.5%), fees from alternative investment sales (up 16%), gains on the sale of loans (up 92.3%) and other income (up 33.1%). Merchant fee income declined by (7.7%) for the three months ended March 31, 2005 as compared to March 31, 2004. The increase in service charge income was the result of additional deposit accounts opened during the first quarter and the establishment of the four new branches opened during 2004 and early 2005 in Red Bluff, Marysville, Colusa and Corning. Loan servicing fees increased as more loans were sold in the secondary market for which the Company retains servicing rights. The Alternative Investment Department, which sells third-party mutual funds and annuities, experienced an increase in fees due to an increase in sales during the first quarter. Gains on sales of loans increased as our Government Lending and Mortgage Lending Divisions sold a greater number of loans in the secondary market.
15
Non-interest Expense
Non-interest expense increased $1,087,000 (28.7%) to $4,874,000 in the first quarter of 2005 versus $3,787,000 in the first quarter of 2004. On a quarter over quarter basis, full time equivalent employees increased by 38 to 219 (21.0%). Salary and employee benefits increased $757,000 (33.2%) resulting from normal cost of living raises, commissions paid to Butte Community Banks Real Estate Loan agents and staffing additions made during the year as the Company continues to grow. Benefit costs and employer taxes increased commensurate with the salaries. On a quarter over quarter basis, occupancy expenses were higher by $41,000 (17%). This increase in costs is associated with the opening of the Red Bluff, Marysville and Colusa offices in 2004 and the opening of the Corning office in March of 2005, and is related to building leases, utilities, janitorial services and property taxes. Fixed asset expense was $391,000 in the first quarter of 2005 compared to $373,000 in the same period of 2004, representing a 4.8% increase. This increase relates to the furniture fixtures and equipment needed to open the four offices mentioned above. Other expenses increased $268,000 (29.9%) in the first quarter of 2005 versus the first quarter of 2004. This increase was attributed to higher telephone, postage and insurance costs as well as increased advertising and promotion costs associated with the new offices.
Provision for Loan Losses
The Company provided $225,000 for loan losses for the both the first quarter of 2005 and 2004. Net loan charge-offs for the three months ended March 31, 2005 were $1,000 as compared to $10,000 in net recoveries for the three months ended March 31, 2004. Management assesses its loan quality on a monthly basis to maintain an adequate allowance for loan losses. The Companys loan portfolio composition, non-performing assets and allowance for loan losses are further discussed under the Balance Sheet Analysis section below.
Provision for Income Taxes
The effective tax rate for the first quarter of 2005 was 40.5%, up slightly from the 39.7% for the same period in 2004.
Balance Sheet Analysis
The Companys total assets were $458,713,000 at March 31, 2005 as compared to $449,675,000 at December 31, 2004, representing an increase of 2.0%. The average balance of total assets for the three months ended March 31, 2005 was $449,807,000, which represents an increase of $59,698,000 (15.3%) over the $390,109,000 during the three-month period ended March 31, 2004.
The Company concentrates its lending activities in the following principal areas: 1) commercial; 2) real estate mortgage; 3) residential real estate and real estate construction (both commercial and residential); 4) agriculture; and 5) consumer loans. Commercial and residential real estate loans are generally secured by improved property, with original maturities of 3-10 years. At March 31, 2005, these principal areas accounted for approximately 17%, 44%, 25%, 6% and 8%, respectively, of the Companys loan portfolio. The mix at December 31, 2004 was 17%, 43%, 26%, 6% and 8%. Continuing strong economic activity in the Companys market area, new borrowers developed through the Companys marketing efforts and credit extensions expanded to existing borrowers, offset by normal loan pay-downs and payoffs, resulted in net increases in loan balances for commercial loans ($1,212,000 or 2.1%), consumer loans ($1,836,000 or 7.0%), commercial and residential real estate loans ($5,354,000 or 3.6%) and decreases in real estate construction loans ($2,187,000 or 2.5%) and agricultural loans ($1,023,000 or 7.0%). Table Five below summarizes the composition of the loan portfolio as of March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004. Real estate construction loans and agricultural loans totals are typically lower in the first quarter because of weather conditions.
16
Table Five: Loan Portfolio Composition
(In thousands) |
|
March 31, |
|
December 31, |
|
||
Commercial |
|
$ |
59,874 |
|
$ |
58,662 |
|
Real estate: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Mortgage |
|
152,230 |
|
146,876 |
|
||
Construction |
|
88,456 |
|
90,643 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Agriculture |
|
21,154 |
|
22,177 |
|
||
Consumer |
|
28,055 |
|
26,219 |
|
||
Total loans |
|
349,769 |
|
344,577 |
|
||
Allowance for loan Losses |
|
(4,605 |
) |
(4,381 |
) |
||
Deferred loan fees, net |
|
(840 |
) |
(1,022 |
) |
||
Total net loans |
|
$ |
344,324 |
|
$ |
339,174 |
|
The majority of the Companys loans are direct loans made to individuals and local businesses. The Company relies substantially on local promotional activity and personal contacts by bank officers, directors and employees to compete with other financial institutions. The Company makes loans to borrowers whose applications include a sound purpose and a viable primary repayment source, generally supported by a secondary source of repayment.
Commercial loans consist of credit lines for operating needs, loans for equipment purchases, working capital, and various other business loan products. Consumer loans include a range of traditional consumer loan products such as personal lines of credit and loans to finance purchases of autos, boats, recreational vehicles, mobile homes and various other consumer items.
Real estate construction loans are generally composed of commitments to customers within the Companys service area for construction of both commercial properties and custom and semi-custom single-family residences. Other real estate loans consist primarily of loans secured by first trust deeds on commercial and residential properties typically with maturities from 3 to 10 years and original loan to value ratios generally from 65% to 80%. Agriculture loans consist primarily of crop loans to farmers of peaches, prunes, walnuts, and almonds. In general, except in the case of loans with SBA or FMHA guarantees, the Company does not make long-term mortgage loans; however, Butte Community Bank has a residential lending division to assist customers in securing most forms of longer term single-family mortgage financing.
The Company assesses and manages credit risk on an ongoing basis through a total credit culture that emphasizes excellent credit quality, extensive internal monitoring and established formal lending policies. Additionally, the Company contracts with an outside loan review consultant to periodically review the existing loan portfolio. Management believes its ability to identify and assess risk and return characteristics of the
Companys loan portfolio is critical for profitability and growth. Management strives to continue its emphasis on credit quality in the loan approval process, active credit administration and regular monitoring. With this in mind, management has designed and implemented a comprehensive loan review and grading system that functions to continually assess the credit risk inherent in the loan portfolio.
Ultimately, underlying trends in economic and business cycles may influence credit quality. The Companys business is concentrated in the Butte, Sutter, Tehama, Shasta, Yuba and Colusa County areas. The economy of these six counties is diversified with professional services, manufacturing, agriculture and real estate investment and construction.
17
Special emphasis is placed within the communities in which the Company has offices (Chico, Paradise, Magalia, Oroville, Yuba City, Red Bluff, Marysville, Colusa and Corning). The Company also maintains loan production offices in the cities of Citrus Heights and Redding. Single-family residential construction is the primary lending product from the Citrus Heights location serving the greater Sacramento area. The primary focus of the loan production office in Redding is commercial loans with an emphasis on Small Business Administration (SBA) loans and other government loan programs.
The Company has significant extensions of credit and commitments to extend credit that are secured by real estate. The ultimate repayment of these loans is generally dependent on personal or business cash flows or the sale or refinancing of the real estate. The Company monitors the effects of current and expected market conditions and other factors on the collectability of real estate loans. The more significant factors management considers involve the following: lease, absorption and sale rates; real estate values and rates of return; operating expenses; inflation; and sufficiency of collateral independent of the real estate including, in limited instances, personal guarantees.
In extending credit and commitments to borrowers, the Company generally requires collateral and/or guarantees as security. The repayment of such loans is expected to come from cash flow or from proceeds from the sale of selected assets of the borrowers. The Companys requirement for collateral and/or guarantees is determined on a case-by-case basis in connection with managements evaluation of the creditworthiness of the borrower. Collateral held varies but may include accounts receivable, inventory, property, plant and equipment, income-producing properties, residences and other real property. The Company secures its collateral by perfecting its security interest in business assets, obtaining deeds of trust, or outright possession among other means.
In managements judgment, a concentration exists in real estate loans, which represented approximately 68.8% of the Companys loan portfolio at March 31, 2005, which is basically the same, on a percentage basis, as the 68.9% concentration level at December 31, 2004. Management believes the concentration to have no more than the normal risk of collectability; however, a substantial decline in the economy in general, or a decline in real estate values in the Companys primary market areas in particular, could have an adverse impact on the collectability of these loans and require an increase in the provision for loan losses which could adversely affect the Companys future prospects, results of operations, profitability and stock price. Management believes that its lending policies and underwriting standards will tend to minimize losses in an economic downturn; however, there is no assurance that losses will not occur under such circumstances. The Companys loan policies and underwriting standards include, but are not limited to, the following: (1) maintaining a thorough understanding of the Companys service area and originating a significant majority of its loans within that area, (2) maintaining a thorough understanding of borrowers knowledge, capacity, and market position in their field of expertise, (3) basing real estate loan approvals not only on market demand for the project, but also on the borrowers capacity to support the project financially in the event it does not perform to expectations (whether sale or income performance), and (4) maintaining conforming and prudent loan to value and loan to cost ratios based on independent outside appraisals and ongoing inspection and analysis by the Companys lending officers.
Management generally places loans on nonaccrual status when they become 90 days past due, unless the loan is well secured and in the process of collection. Loans are charged off when, in the opinion of management, collection appears unlikely.
Table Six below sets forth nonaccrual loans as of March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004. There were no loans past due 90 days or more and still accruing interest at March 31, 2005 or December 31, 2004.
18
Table Six: Non-Performing Loans
(In thousands) |
|
March 31, |
|
December 31, |
|
||
Nonaccrual: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Commercial |
|
0 |
|
17 |
|
||
Real estate |
|
0 |
|
|
|
||
Consumer and other |
|
0 |
|
84 |
|
||
Total non-performing loans |
|
$ |
0 |
|
$ |
101 |
|
At March 31, 2005, there were no non-performing loans. There were no loan concentrations in excess of 10% of total loans not otherwise disclosed as a category of loans as of March 31, 2005 or December 31, 2004. Management is not aware of any potential problem loans, which were accruing and current at March 31, 2005, where serious doubt exists as to the ability of the borrower to comply with the present repayment terms.
We employ a systematic methodology for determining the allowance for loan losses that includes a monthly review process and monthly adjustment of the allowance. Our process includes a periodic review of individual loans that have been specifically identified as problem loans or have characteristics which could lead to impairment, as well as detailed reviews of other loans (either individually or in pools). While this methodology utilizes historical and other objective information, the establishment of the allowance for loan losses and the classification of loans are, to some extent, based on managements judgment and experience.
Our methodology incorporates a variety of risk considerations, both quantitative and qualitative, in establishing an allowance for loan losses that management believes is appropriate at each reporting date. Quantitative factors include our historical loss experience, delinquency and charge-off trends, collateral values, changes in non-performing loans, and other factors. Quantitative factors also incorporate known information about individual loans, including borrowers sensitivity to interest rate movements and borrowers sensitivity to quantifiable external factors including commodity prices as well as acts of nature (freezes, earthquakes, fires, etc.) that occur in a particular period.
Qualitative factors include the general economic environment in our markets and, in particular, the state of the agriculture industry and other key industries in the Northern Sacramento Valley. The way a particular loan might be structured, the extent and nature of waivers of existing loan policies, loan concentrations and the rate of portfolio growth are other qualitative factors that are considered.
Our methodology is, and has been, consistently followed. However, as we add new products, increase in complexity, and expand our geographic coverage, we expect to enhance our methodology to keep pace with the size and complexity of the loan portfolio. On an ongoing basis we engage outside firms to independently assess our methodology, and to perform independent credit reviews of our loan portfolio. The FDIC and the California Department of Financial Institutions review the allowance for loan losses as an integral part of the examination processes. Management believes that our current methodology is appropriate given our size and level of complexity. Further, management believes that the allowance for loan losses is adequate as of March 31, 2005 to cover known and inherent risks in the loan portfolio. However, fluctuations in credit quality, or changes in economic conditions or other factors could cause management to increase or decrease the allowance for loan losses as necessary.
19
The Loan Committee of the Bank reviews the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses at least quarterly to include consideration of the relative risks in the portfolio and current economic conditions. The allowance is adjusted based on that review if, in the judgment of the loan committee and management, changes are warranted. The allowance for loan losses totaled $4,605,000 or 1.31% of total loans at March 31, 2005 and $4,381,000 or 1.27% at December 31, 2004. Net charge-offs to average loans for the first quarter of 2005 were zero and were .004% for the same period in the prior year.
Table Seven below summarizes, for the periods indicated, the activity in the allowance for loan losses.
Table Seven: Allowance for Loan Losses
|
|
Three Months |
|
||||
(In thousands, except for percentages) |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Average loans outstanding |
|
$ |
348,003 |
|
$ |
278,557 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Allowance for possible loan losses at beginning of period |
|
$ |
4,381 |
|
$ |
3,587 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Loans charged off: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Commercial |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Real estate |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Consumer |
|
(1 |
) |
(7 |
) |
||
Total |
|
(1 |
) |
(7 |
) |
||
Recoveries of loans previously charged off: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Commercial |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Real estate |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Consumer |
|
|
|
17 |
|
||
Total |
|
|
|
17 |
|
||
Net loan charge offs |
|
(1 |
) |
10 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Additions to allowance charged to operating expenses |
|
225 |
|
225 |
|
||
Allowance for loan losses at end of period |
|
$ |
4,605 |
|
$ |
3,822 |
|
Ratio of net charge-offs to average loans outstanding |
|
.000 |
% |
.004 |
% |
||
Provision for possible loan losses to average loans outstanding |
|
.065 |
% |
.081 |
% |
||
Allowance for loan losses to loans net of deferred fees at end of period |
|
1.31 |
% |
1.35 |
% |
It is the policy of management to maintain the allowance for loan losses at a level adequate for known and inherent risks in the portfolio. Based on information currently available to analyze inherent credit risk, including economic
20
factors, overall credit quality, historical delinquencies and a history of actual charge-offs, management believes that the provision for loan losses and the allowance are prudent and adequate. The Company generally makes monthly allocations to the allowance for loan losses. The budgeted allocation is based on estimates of loss risk and loan growth. Adjustments may be made based on differences from estimated loan growth, the types of loans constituting this growth, changes in risk ratings within the portfolio, and general economic conditions. However, no prediction of the ultimate level of loans charged off in future years can be made with any certainty.
Other Real Estate
At March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004, the Company did not have any other real estate (ORE) properties.
Deposits
At March 31, 2005, total deposits were $406,840,000 representing an increase of $7,781,000 (1.9%) over the December 31, 2004 balance of $399,059,000.
Capital Resources
The current and projected capital position of the Company and the impact of capital plans and long-term strategies are reviewed regularly by management. The Companys capital position represents the level of capital available to support continued operations and expansion.
The Board of Directors of the Company authorized the payment of a cash dividend of $.075 per share on January 23, 2004, April 23, 2004, and July 23, 2004, $.075 per share on October 22, 2004 and January 28, 2005. The payment of dividends in the future is subject to the discretion of the Board of Directors of the Company and will depend on earnings, the financial condition of the Company and other relevant factors.
The Company and its subsidiary Bank are subject to certain regulations issued by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System and the FDIC which require maintenance of certain levels of capital. At March 31, 2005, shareholders equity was $35,906,000, representing an increase of $1,375,000 (4.0%) from $34,531,000 at December 31, 2004. The increase is primarily the result of the net income from the period offset by the cash dividends discussed above. The Banks ratio of total risk-based capital to risk adjusted assets was 11.3% at March 31, 2005 which was unchanged from December 31, 2004. Tier 1 risk-based capital to risk-adjusted assets was 10.1% at March 31, 2005 and 10.2% at December 31, 2004.
Table Eight below lists the Company and the Bank capital ratios at March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004, as well as the minimum ratios required under regulatory definitions of capital adequacy.
21
Table Eight: Capital Ratios (Unaudited)
Capital to Risk-Adjusted Assets |
|
At March 31, |
|
At December 31, |
|
Minimum |
|
Company |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Leverage ratio |
|
9.8 |
% |
9.5 |
% |
4.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tier 1 Risk-Based Capital |
|
11.4 |
% |
11.3 |
% |
4.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Risk-Based Capital |
|
12.6 |
% |
12.5 |
% |
8.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bank |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Leverage ratio |
|
8.7 |
% |
8.6 |
% |
4.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tier 1 Risk-Based Capital |
|
10.1 |
% |
10.2 |
% |
4.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Risk-Based Capital |
|
11.3 |
% |
11.3 |
% |
8.0 |
% |
Capital ratios are reviewed on a regular basis to ensure that capital exceeds the prescribed regulatory minimums and is adequate to meet future needs. All ratios are in excess of the regulatory definition of Minimum at March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004. The Bank was considered well-capitalized by regulatory standards, at March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
Market Risk Management
Overview. Market risk is the risk of loss from adverse changes in market prices and rates. The Companys market risk arises primarily from interest rate risk inherent in its loan, investment and deposit portfolios. The goal for managing the assets and liabilities of the Company is to maximize shareholder value and earnings while maintaining a high quality balance sheet without exposing the Company to undue interest rate risk.
The Board of Directors has overall responsibility for the interest rate risk management policies. The Bank has an Asset and Liability Management Committee (ALCO) that establishes and monitors guidelines to control the sensitivity of earnings to changes in interest rates.
Asset/Liability Management. Activities involved in asset/liability management include, but are not limited to, lending, accepting and placing deposits, investing in securities, using trust preferred securities and borrowings. Interest rate risk is the primary market risk associated with asset/liability management. Sensitivity of earnings to interest rate changes arises when yields on assets change in a different time period or in a different amount from that of interest costs on liabilities. To mitigate interest rate risk, the structure of the balance sheet is managed with the goal that movements of interest rates on assets and liabilities are correlated and contributes to earnings even in periods of volatile interest rates. The asset/liability management policy sets limits on the acceptable amount of variance in net interest margin and market value of equity under changing interest environments. The Company uses simulation models to forecast earnings, net interest margin and market value of equity.
22
Simulation of earnings is the primary tool used to measure the sensitivity of earnings to interest rate changes. Using computer-modeling techniques, the Company is able to estimate the potential impact of changing interest rates on earnings. A balance sheet forecast is prepared monthly using inputs of actual loans, securities and interest bearing liability (i.e. deposits/borrowings) positions as the beginning base. The forecast balance sheet is processed against seven interest rate scenarios. These scenarios include a 100, 200 and 300 basis point rising rate forecast, a flat rate forecast and a 100, 200 and 300 basis point falling rate forecast which take place within a one year time frame. The net interest income is measured during the year assuming a gradual change in rates over the twelve-month horizon. The Companys net interest income, as forecast below, was modeled utilizing a forecast balance sheet projected from balances as of the date indicated.
Table Nine below summarizes the effect on net interest income (NII) of a ±200 basis point change in interest rates as measured against a constant rate (no change) scenario. The results shown in Table nine for the two periods, fall within the parameters of the Banks policy for interest rate risk.
Table Nine: Interest Rate Risk Simulation of Net Interest as of March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004 (Unaudited)
(In thousands) |
|
$ Change in NII |
|
$ Change in NII |
|
||
Variation from a constant rate scenario |
|
|
|
|
|
||
+200bp |
|
$ |
1,960 |
|
$ |
1,513 |
|
- 200bp |
|
$ |
(819 |
) |
$ |
395 |
|
Assumptions are inherently uncertain, and, consequently, the model cannot precisely measure net interest income or precisely predict the impact of changes in interest rates on net interest income. Actual results will differ from simulated results due to timing, magnitude and frequency of interest rate changes, as well as changes in market conditions and management strategies which might moderate the negative consequences of interest rate deviations. In the model above, the simulation shows that the Company is asset sensitive over the one-year horizon as increasing rates have a positive impact on net interest income and declining rates have a negative impact.
Inflation
The impact of inflation on a financial institution differs significantly from that exerted on manufacturing, or other commercial concerns, primarily because its assets and liabilities are largely monetary. In general, inflation primarily affects the Company and it subsidiaries through its effect on market rates of interest, which affects the Companys ability to attract loan customers. Inflation affects the growth of total assets by increasing the level of loan demand, and potentially adversely affects capital adequacy because loan growth in inflationary periods can increase at rates higher than the rate capital grows through retention of earnings, which may be generated in the future. In addition to its effects on interest rates, inflation increases overall operating expenses. Inflation has not had a material effect upon the results of operations of the Company and its subsidiaries during the periods ended March 31, 2005, and 2004.
23
Liquidity
Liquidity management refers to the Companys ability to provide funds on an ongoing basis to meet fluctuations in deposit levels as well as the credit needs and requirements of its clients. Both assets and liabilities contribute to the Companys liquidity position. Federal funds lines, short-term investments and securities, and loan repayments contribute to liquidity, along with deposit increases, while loan funding and deposit withdrawals decrease liquidity. The Company assesses the likelihood of projected funding requirements by reviewing historical funding patterns, current and forecasted economic conditions and individual client funding needs. Commitments to fund loans at March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004 were approximately $152,100,000 and $153,570,000, respectively. Such loans relate primarily to revolving lines of credit and other commercial loans, and to real estate construction loans.
The Companys sources of liquidity consist of cash and due from correspondent banks, overnight funds sold to correspondent banks, unpledged marketable investments and loans held for sale. On March 31, 2005, consolidated liquid assets totaled $58.8 million or 12.8% of total assets compared to $62.7 million or 13.9% of total assets on December 31, 2004. In addition to liquid assets, the Company maintains short-term lines of credit in the amount of $15,000,000 with correspondent banks. There were no borrowings outstanding under these arrangements at March 31, 2005. The Bank also has informal agreements with various other banks to sell participations in loans, if necessary. The Company serves primarily a business and professional customer base and, as such, its deposit base is susceptible to economic fluctuations. Accordingly, management strives to maintain a balanced position of liquid assets to volatile and cyclical deposits.
Liquidity is also affected by portfolio maturities and the effect of interest rate fluctuations on the marketability of both assets and liabilities. The Company can sell any of its unpledged securities held in the available-for-sale category to meet liquidity needs.
The Company has certain ongoing commitments under operating leases. These commitments do not significantly impact operating results. As of March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004, commitments to extend credit and letters of credit were the only financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk. The Company has not entered into any contracts for financial derivative instruments such as futures, swaps, options or similar instruments. Loan commitments and letters of credit were $152,100,000 and $153,570,000 at March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004, respectively. As a percentage of net loans, these off-balance sheet items represent 45.0% and 52.3%, respectively. The fair value of the liability related to the letters of credit, which represents the fees received for issuing the guarantees, was not significant at March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004. The Company recognizes these fees as revenue over the term of the commitment or when the commitment is used.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
(a) Disclosure Controls and Procedures: An evaluation of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) was carried out under the supervision and with the participation of the Companys Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and other members of the Companys senior management as of the end of the Companys fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2005. The Companys Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Companys disclosure controls and procedures as currently in effect are effective in ensuring that the information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports it files or submits under the Exchange Act is (i) accumulated and communicated to the Companys management (including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Offi cer) to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure, and (ii) recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Commissions rules and forms.
24
(b) Internal Control Over Financial Reporting: An evaluation of any changes in the Companys internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)), that occurred during the Companys fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2005, was carried out under the supervision and with the participation of the Companys Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and other members of the Companys senior management. The Companys Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that no change identified in connection with such evaluation has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Companys internal control over financial reporting.
Item 1. Legal Proceedings. |
|
None. |
|
Item 2. Changes in Securities and Use of Proceeds. |
|
None. |
|
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities. |
|
None. |
|
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders. |
|
None. |
|
Item 5. Other Information. |
|
Subsequent Events |
On April 28, 2005 the Company announced its intent to file an application to NASDAQ with the intent of listing the shares of Community Valley Bancorp on the NASDAQ Small Cap Market.
Item 6. Exhibits
(a) Exhibits
Exhibit
|
Document Description |
|||
|
|
|
||
(31.1) |
|
Certification of CEO pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
||
|
|
|
|
|
(31.2) |
|
Certification of CFO pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
||
|
|
|
|
|
(32.1) |
|
Certification of CEO pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
||
|
|
|
|
|
(32.2) |
|
Certification of CFO pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
(b) Reports on Form 8-K |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
On January 31, 2005 the Company filed a Report on form 8-k announcing the financial results for 2004. |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
On February 2, 2005 the Company filed a Report on form 8-k amending the financial results for 2004 originally released on January 31, 2005. |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
On March 16, 2005, the Company filed a Report on form 8-k announcing a seven and one half cent per share Cash Dividend for shareholders of record on March 31, 2005, payable April 22, 2005. |
25
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
COMMUNITY VALLEY BANCORP |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
||||
May 2, 2005 |
|
|
|
By: |
/s/ Keith C. Robbins |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
Keith C. Robbins |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
President, Chief Executive Officer |
||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
May 2, 2005 |
|
|
|
By: |
/s/ John F. Coger |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
John F. Coger |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
Executive Vice President, CFO, COO |
||||
26