UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, DC 20549
FORM 10-Q
QUARTERLY REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal quarter ended April 1, 2005
Commission File Number: 0-28426
ZOMAX INCORPORATED
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Minnesota |
|
No. 41-1833089 |
(State or Other Jurisdiction of |
|
(IRS Employer |
|
|
|
5353 Nathan Lane |
|
55442 |
(Address of Principal Executive Offices) |
|
(Zip Code) |
|
|
|
(763) 553-9300 |
||
(Registrants telephone number, including area code) |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
YESý |
|
NOo |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 12b-2).
YESý |
|
NOo |
The number of shares outstanding of the registrants common stock as of April 29, 2005 was 32,632,061 shares.
ZOMAX INCORPORATED
INDEX
DESCRIPTION |
|
|
||
|
|
|||
|
||||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
||
|
||||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
||||
|
|
|||
|
||||
2
ZOMAX INCORPORATED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (UNAUDITED)
(In thousands, except per share data)
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
||||
|
|
April 1, |
|
March 26, |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Revenue |
|
$ |
42,181 |
|
$ |
50,035 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Cost of revenue |
|
40,385 |
|
43,085 |
|
||
Gross profit |
|
1,796 |
|
6,950 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Operating costs and expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
10,227 |
|
9,405 |
|
||
Restructuring costs |
|
230 |
|
|
|
||
Litigation reserve adjustment |
|
(1,830 |
) |
|
|
||
Total operating costs and expenses |
|
8,627 |
|
9,405 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Operating loss |
|
(6,831 |
) |
(2,455 |
) |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Interest income |
|
345 |
|
178 |
|
||
Other income (expense), net |
|
5 |
|
(19 |
) |
||
Loss before income taxes |
|
(6,481 |
) |
(2,296 |
) |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Income tax benefit |
|
(2,333 |
) |
(750 |
) |
||
Net loss |
|
$ |
(4,148 |
) |
$ |
(1,546 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Loss per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Basic |
|
$ |
(0.13 |
) |
$ |
(0.05 |
) |
Diluted |
|
$ |
(0.13 |
) |
$ |
(0.05 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Weighted average common shares outstanding: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Basic |
|
32,613 |
|
32,716 |
|
||
Dilutive effect of stock options |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Diluted |
|
32,613 |
|
32,716 |
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
3
ZOMAX INCORPORATED
|
|
April 1, |
|
December 31, |
|
||
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
39,185 |
|
$ |
41,092 |
|
Available-for-sale securities |
|
20,500 |
|
19,200 |
|
||
Accounts receivable, net of allowances of $852 in 2005 and $868 in 2004 |
|
23,848 |
|
36,180 |
|
||
Inventories |
|
14,197 |
|
14,633 |
|
||
Deferred income taxes |
|
1,699 |
|
1,704 |
|
||
Other current assets |
|
9,733 |
|
10,410 |
|
||
Total current assets |
|
109,162 |
|
123,219 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Property and equipment, net |
|
33,161 |
|
35,408 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Available-for-sale securities |
|
1,673 |
|
3,624 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Deferred income taxes |
|
8,957 |
|
5,903 |
|
||
|
|
$ |
152,953 |
|
$ |
168,154 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
13,351 |
|
$ |
20,710 |
|
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities |
|
17,620 |
|
19,177 |
|
||
Total current liabilities |
|
30,971 |
|
39,887 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Deferred rent |
|
137 |
|
155 |
|
||
Total liabilities |
|
31,108 |
|
40,042 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Shareholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Common stock, no par value, 100,000 shares authorized; 32,632 and 32,536 shares issued and outstanding in 2005 and 2004, respectively |
|
62,423 |
|
62,134 |
|
||
Retained earnings |
|
52,713 |
|
56,861 |
|
||
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
|
6,709 |
|
9,117 |
|
||
Total shareholders equity |
|
121,845 |
|
128,112 |
|
||
|
|
$ |
152,953 |
|
$ |
168,154 |
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
4
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
||||
|
|
April 1, |
|
March 26, |
|
||
Operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Net loss |
|
$ |
(4,148 |
) |
$ |
(1,546 |
) |
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Depreciation |
|
2,144 |
|
2,466 |
|
||
Change in deferred taxes |
|
(2,318 |
) |
261 |
|
||
Change in litigation reserves |
|
(1,830 |
) |
|
|
||
Other, net |
|
|
|
(14 |
) |
||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Accounts receivable |
|
11,990 |
|
7,684 |
|
||
Inventories |
|
334 |
|
1,404 |
|
||
Other assets and liabilities |
|
683 |
|
(175 |
) |
||
Accounts payable |
|
(7,218 |
) |
(7,731 |
) |
||
Accrued expenses |
|
342 |
|
(10,261 |
) |
||
Income taxes |
|
(70 |
) |
(888 |
) |
||
Net cash used by operating activities |
|
(91 |
) |
(8,800 |
) |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Purchases of property and equipment |
|
(549 |
) |
(615 |
) |
||
Purchases of available for sale securities |
|
(14,500 |
) |
(9,200 |
) |
||
Sale of available-for-sale securities |
|
13,200 |
|
3,000 |
|
||
Net cash used by investing activities |
|
(1,849 |
) |
(6,815 |
) |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Issuance of common stock |
|
289 |
|
448 |
|
||
Net cash provided by financing activities |
|
289 |
|
448 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents |
|
(256 |
) |
(546 |
) |
||
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents |
|
(1,907 |
) |
(15,713 |
) |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period |
|
41,092 |
|
51,899 |
|
||
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period |
|
$ |
39,185 |
|
$ |
36,186 |
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements
5
ZOMAX INCORPORATED
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
NOTE 1. GENERAL
Basis of Presentation. The consolidated financial statements have been prepared by the Company, without audit, pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). The information furnished in the consolidated financial statements includes normal recurring adjustments and reflects all adjustments which are, in the opinion of management, necessary for a fair presentation of such financial statements. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America have been condensed or omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations. Although the Company believes that the disclosures are adequate to make the information presented not misleading, it is suggested that these consolidated financial statements be read in conjunction with the financial statements and the notes thereto included in our 2004 Annual Report on Form 10-K. The quarterly results are not necessarily indicative of the actual results that may occur for the entire fiscal year.
Fiscal Quarters. Our fiscal quarters consist of 13-weeks ending on a Friday so that our fiscal year ends on the last Friday of the calendar year. Our fiscal quarters referenced herein refer to the periods ended April 1, 2005, December 31, 2004 and March 26, 2004.
Restatement. As fully discussed in Note 7 and in our 2004 Form 10-K, our quarterly 2004 consolidated financial results have been restated to correct previously disclosed misstatements in our Ireland subsidiary, Zomax Limited.
Reclassifications. Certain reclassifications have been made to the 2004 financial statements and footnotes to conform to the presentation used in 2005. These reclassifications had no effect on the amounts of total current assets, total assets, net loss or cash flow from operations.
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements. In November 2004 the FASB issued SFAS No. 151, Inventory Costs, an amendment of ARB No. 43, Chapter 4 (SFAS 151). SFAS 151 amends the guidance in ARB No. 43, Chapter 4, Inventory Pricing, to clarify the accounting for abnormal amounts of idle facility expense, freight, handling costs, and spoilage. This statement requires that those items be recognized as current period charges regardless of whether they meet the criterion of so abnormal which was the criterion specified in ARB No. 43. In addition, this Statement requires that allocation of fixed production overheads to the cost of production be based on normal capacity of the production facilities. This pronouncement is effective for the Company beginning in the first quarter of 2006. The Company is in the process of evaluating whether the adoption of SFAS 151 will have a significant impact on the Companys overall results of operations, financial position or cash flows, however, it is unlikely that impact will be material.
In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 153, Exchanges of Nonmonetary Assets, an amendment of APB Opinion No. 29, Accounting for Nonmonetary Transactions. The amendments made by Statement 153 are based on the principle that exchanges of nonmonetary assets should be measured based on the fair value of the assets exchanged. Further, the amendments eliminate the narrow exception for nonmonetary exchanges of similar productive assets and replace it with a broader exception for exchanges of nonmonetary assets that do not have commercial substance. The Statement is effective for the Company relative to nonmonetary asset exchanges beginning December 31, 2005. The provisions of this Statement shall be applied prospectively. The Company is in the process of evaluating whether the adoption of SFAS 153 will have a significant impact on the Companys overall results of operations or financial position, however, it is unlikely the impact will be material.
In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 123(R) Share-Based Payment. SFAS 123(R) requires the recognition of compensation cost relating to share-based payment transactions in financial statements. That cost will be measured based on the fair value of the equity or liability instruments issued as of the grant date, based on the estimated number of awards that are expected to vest. SFAS 123(R) covers a wide range of share-based compensation arrangements including share options, restricted share plans, performance-based awards, share appreciation rights, and employee share purchase plans. Statement 123(R) replaces FASB Statement No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, and supersedes APB Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees. In April 2005, the SEC delayed the effective date of SFAS 123(R) to fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2005. As a result SFAS 123(R) will be effective for the Company beginning in the first quarter of 2006. The Company is in the process of evaluating the impact of SFAS 123(R) on the Companys overall results of operations, financial position and cash flows. Refer to pro forma disclosure in Note 3 for an indication of ongoing expense that will be included in the income statement once SFAS 123(R) is adopted.
On October 22, 2004, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position (FSP) 109-1, Application of FASB Statement No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes, for the Tax Deduction Provided to U.S. Based Manufacturers by the American Job
6
Creation Act of 2004, and FSP 109-2, Accounting and Disclosure Guidance for the Foreign Earnings Repatriation Provisions within the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004. FSP No. 109-1 clarifies how to apply SFAS No. 109 to the new laws tax deduction for income attributable to domestic production activities. The fully phased-in deduction is up to nine percent of the lesser of taxable income or qualified production activities income. The staff proposal would require that the deduction be accounted for as a special deduction in the period earned, not as a tax-rate reduction.
FSP No. 109-2, provides guidance under SFAS No. 109 with respect to recording the potential impact of the repatriation provisions of the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004 (the Jobs Act) on enterprises income tax expense and deferred tax liability FSP 109-2 states that an enterprise is permitted time beyond the financial reporting period of enactment to evaluate the effect of the Jobs Act on its plan for reinvestment or repatriation of foreign earnings for purposes of applying SFAS No. 109. By electing to apply the provisions of Section 965 of the Internal Revenue Code, enacted as part of the Jobs Act, to repatriate extraordinary dividends we will therefore be eligible to claim an eighty-five percent dividends received deduction for income tax purposes on the eligible amounts. We are in the process of determining whether we will elect to utilize the provision of the Jobs Act which provides a one-time election to repatriate earnings from foreign subsidiaries at a reduced U.S. tax rate. Currently we have not drawn any conclusion regarding this opportunity to our overall strategy and expect to complete the evaluation of this opportunity by July 1, 2005.
NOTE 2. OTHER FINANCIAL STATEMENT INFORMATION
Inventories (in thousands):
|
|
April 1, |
|
December 31 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Raw materials |
|
$ |
8,620 |
|
$ |
7,531 |
|
Work in process |
|
2,304 |
|
2,821 |
|
||
Finished goods |
|
3,273 |
|
4,281 |
|
||
|
|
$ |
14,197 |
|
$ |
14,633 |
|
Supplemental Cash Flow Information (in thousands):
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
||||
|
|
April 1, 2005 |
|
March 26, 2004 |
|
||
Cash paid for: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Interest |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
88 |
|
Income taxes |
|
71 |
|
297 |
|
||
Non-cash transactions: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Unrealized loss on available-for-sale securities, net of deferred taxes of $728 in 2005 and $285 in 2004 |
|
(1,224 |
) |
(446 |
) |
||
7
Comprehensive Loss. The table below presents our comprehensive loss, defined as changes in shareholders equity excluding changes resulting from investments by and distributions to shareholders (in thousands):
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
||||
|
|
April 1, |
|
March 26, |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Net loss |
|
$ |
(4,148 |
) |
$ |
(1,546 |
) |
Unrealized holding loss on available-for-sale securities, net of tax |
|
(1,224 |
) |
(446 |
) |
||
Translation adjustments |
|
(1,184 |
) |
(851 |
) |
||
Comprehensive loss |
|
$ |
(6,556 |
) |
$ |
(2,843 |
) |
NOTE 3. STOCK BASED COMPENSATION
We have a 1996 Stock Option Plan (the 1996 Plan), a 2004 Equity Incentive Plan (the 2004 Plan) and an Employee Stock Purchase Plan. Options granted under these plans are accounted for under Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees. Because our stock options are granted at the market value on the date of grant, no related compensation expense is recognized. However, had the compensation expense of option grants been determined in accordance with SFAS No. 123(R), our net loss and loss per share, on a pro forma basis, would have been reported as follows (in thousands, except per share data):
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
||||
|
|
April 1, |
|
March 26, |
|
||
Net Loss: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
As reported |
|
$ |
(4,148 |
) |
$ |
(1,546 |
) |
Pro forma |
|
$ |
(4,395 |
) |
$ |
(1,776 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Basic Loss per Share: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
As reported |
|
$ |
(0.13 |
) |
$ |
(0.05 |
) |
Pro forma |
|
$ |
(0.13 |
) |
$ |
(0.05 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Diluted Loss per Share: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
As reported |
|
$ |
(0.13 |
) |
$ |
(0.05 |
) |
Pro forma |
|
$ |
(0.13 |
) |
$ |
(0.05 |
) |
NOTE 4. AVAILABLE-FOR-SALE SECURITIES
Our short-term investments in available-for-sale securities consist of auction rate preferred securities and municipal auction rate notes. These investments, which have original maturities beyond one year, may be classified as short-term based on their highly liquid nature and because these securities represent the investment of cash that is available for current operations. These investments are classified as available-for-sale and recorded at fair value. The carrying value of short-term available-for-sale securities approximates fair market value due to their short maturities. As of April 1, 2005 and December 31, 2004, we had $20,500,000 and $19,200,000 in short term available-for-sale securities, respectively.
Our long-term investment in available-for-sale securities consists of 3,098,000 shares of Intraware common stock (NASDAQ symbol: ITRA). We purchased 6,000,098 shares for $0.82 per share in August 2002 in connection with the establishment of a strategic relationship with Intraware, a provider of electronic software delivery services. In May 2004, we sold 3,000,000 shares which resulted in proceeds of approximately $5,230,000 and a pre-tax gain of approximately $2,770,000. The market value of our investment in Intraware was $1,673,000 as of April 1, 2005 and $3,624,000 as of December 2004.
8
NOTE 5. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Wells Notice and Shareholder Lawsuit. As previously disclosed in our filings with the SEC, we have been the subject of an SEC investigation and a consolidated class action lawsuit involving allegations of securities law violations. The allegations relate to Company disclosures and certain stock sales by two former officers during the third quarter of the year 2000. Under FASB Statement No. 5, Accounting for Contingencies, and FASB Interpretation No. 14, Reasonable Estimation of the Amount of a Loss, an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 5, we have established reserves as of April 1, 2005 and December 31, 2004 as follows:
|
|
April 1, |
|
December 31, |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Class action lawsuit, net of expected insurance proceeds |
|
$ |
4,690 |
|
$ |
6,520 |
|
SEC investigation |
|
2,000 |
|
2,000 |
|
||
|
|
$ |
6,690 |
|
$ |
8,520 |
|
A portion of the settlement offer related to the consolidated class action lawsuit includes the proposed issuance of 1,500,000 shares of the Companys common stock and has been valued at $4,335,000 and $6,165,000 based on the closing market prices of $2.89 and $4.11 on April 1, 2005 and December 31, 2004, respectively.
Subsequent to the end of the fiscal quarter, we announced an agreement to settle, without admission of liability, the outstanding class action lawsuit. See Note 8 for further discussion of the details of the class action settlement agreement.
With respect to the SEC investigation, the Companys settlement offer announced in November 2004 is still under consideration by the SEC. There is no assurance that this settlement offer will be accepted and eventual losses may exceed the related reserves and could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition or cash flows.
We are involved in certain other claims arising in the normal course of business. In our opinion, the final resolution of these claims should not have a material adverse effect on our financial position, cash flow or results from operations.
9
NOTE 6. SEGMENT AND GEOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION
We operate in one industry segment. The geographic distributions of our revenue, operating income (loss), capital expenditures, depreciation and identifiable assets for 2005 and 2004 are summarized as follows (in thousands):
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
||||
|
|
April 1, 2005 |
|
March 26, |
|
||
Revenue: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
United States |
|
$ |
31,888 |
|
$ |
37,492 |
|
Ireland |
|
8,031 |
|
9,260 |
|
||
Canada |
|
6,906 |
|
7,587 |
|
||
Intergeographic sales |
|
(4,644 |
) |
(4,304 |
) |
||
|
|
$ |
42,181 |
|
$ |
50,035 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Operating (loss) income: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
United States |
|
$ |
(2,130 |
) |
$ |
208 |
|
Ireland |
|
(1,942 |
) |
(256 |
) |
||
Canada |
|
(230 |
) |
551 |
|
||
Corporate and eliminations |
|
(2,529 |
) |
(2,958 |
) |
||
|
|
$ |
(6,831 |
) |
$ |
(2,455 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Capital expenditures: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
United States |
|
$ |
299 |
|
$ |
334 |
|
Ireland |
|
192 |
|
281 |
|
||
Canada |
|
58 |
|
|
|
||
|
|
$ |
549 |
|
$ |
615 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Depreciation: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
United States |
|
$ |
1,178 |
|
$ |
1,484 |
|
Ireland |
|
499 |
|
415 |
|
||
Canada |
|
467 |
|
567 |
|
||
|
|
$ |
2,144 |
|
$ |
2,466 |
|
|
|
As of April 1, |
|
As of |
|
||
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
United States |
|
$ |
35,791 |
|
$ |
42,946 |
|
Ireland |
|
23,427 |
|
27,646 |
|
||
Canada |
|
17,775 |
|
17,384 |
|
||
Total identifiable assets |
|
76,993 |
|
87,976 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Corporate assets |
|
75,960 |
|
80,178 |
|
||
|
|
$ |
152,953 |
|
$ |
168,154 |
|
10
NOTE 7. RESTATEMENT OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
As previously disclosed in our 2004 Form 10-K, on February 24, 2005, our management and the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors concluded that, as a result of our internal investigation into financial reporting and accounting irregularities at our Ireland Subsidiary, Zomax Limited (Zomax Ireland), the Companys financial statements for the first, second and third quarters of 2004, should be restated.
Our internal investigation indicated that the actions of certain accounting personnel in Zomax Ireland caused the operation to overstate its operating results. These actions include the improper accounting for certain expenses and the failure to follow Company policy and properly reconcile certain balance sheet accounts. These irregularities resulted in the aggregate understatement of 2004 consolidated net loss by $1,823,000 for the nine months ended September 24, 2004. For further discussion of the impact of this matter on our evaluation of our internal controls over financial reporting, see Item 9A of our 2004 Form 10-K and Item 4 of this Form 10-Q.
The Companys previously reported unaudited Consolidated Statement of Operations and Consolidated Balance Sheet for the first quarter of 2004 on Form 10-Q are restated as follows:
ZOMAX INCORPORATED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (UNAUDITED)
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
||||
|
|
Reported |
|
Restated |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Revenue |
|
$ |
50,035 |
|
$ |
50,035 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Cost of revenue |
|
42,696 |
|
43,085 |
|
||
Gross profit |
|
7,339 |
|
6,950 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
9,166 |
|
9,405 |
|
||
Operating loss |
|
(1,827 |
) |
(2,455 |
) |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Interest income |
|
178 |
|
178 |
|
||
Other expense, net |
|
(19 |
) |
(19 |
) |
||
Loss before income taxes |
|
(1,668 |
) |
(2,296 |
) |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Income tax benefit |
|
(687 |
) |
(750 |
) |
||
Net loss |
|
$ |
(981 |
) |
$ |
(1,546 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Loss per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Basic |
|
$ |
(0.03 |
) |
$ |
(0.05 |
) |
Diluted |
|
$ |
(0.03 |
) |
$ |
(0.05 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Weighted average common shares outstanding: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Basic |
|
32,716 |
|
32,716 |
|
||
Dilutive effect of stock options |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Diluted |
|
32,716 |
|
32,716 |
|
11
ZOMAX INCORPORATED
|
|
As of March 26, 2004 |
|
||||||
|
|
Reported |
|
Restated |
|
||||
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
36,186 |
|
$ |
36,186 |
|
||
Available-for-sale securities |
|
23,200 |
|
23,200 |
|
||||
Accounts receivable, net of allowances of $1,027 |
|
31,902 |
|
31,676 |
|
||||
Inventories |
|
11,287 |
|
10,896 |
|
||||
Deferred income taxes |
|
2,680 |
|
2,680 |
|
||||
Other current assets |
|
9,298 |
|
9,176 |
|
||||
Total current assets |
|
114,553 |
|
113,814 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Property and equipment, net |
|
36,690 |
|
36,357 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Available-for-sale securities |
|
10,915 |
|
10,915 |
|
||||
|
|
$ |
162,158 |
|
$ |
161,086 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
12,527 |
|
$ |
12,804 |
|
||
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities |
|
12,666 |
|
12,575 |
|
||||
Total current liabilities |
|
25,193 |
|
25,379 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Deferred income taxes |
|
1,049 |
|
1,049 |
|
||||
Total liabilities |
|
26,242 |
|
26,428 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Shareholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Common stock |
|
62,917 |
|
62,917 |
|
||||
Retained earnings |
|
64,911 |
|
63,726 |
|
||||
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
|
8,088 |
|
8,015 |
|
||||
Total shareholders equity |
|
135,916 |
|
134,658 |
|
||||
|
|
$ |
162,158 |
|
$ |
161,086 |
|
||
NOTE 8. SUBSEQUENT EVENT
On April 27, 2005, we announced, without admission of liability, an agreement to settle the outstanding class action lawsuit arising from claims that, in the year 2000, the Company had provided false and misleading forward-looking information to the public while former officers had sold Company stock. This stipulation of settlement, if ultimately approved by the Court, will result in payments of $2,250,000 in cash and 1,500,000 shares of the Companys common stock. We expect the entire $2,250,000 cash payment will be paid by our directors and officers insurance carrier. These settlement payments will be distributed to shareholders who incurred losses as a result of stock purchases between May 25, 2000 and October 18, 2002, inclusive, and to plaintiffs attorneys as fees and costs awarded by the Court. The charge against earnings associated with the issuance of the 1,500,000 shares of stock was initially recorded in the third quarter of 2004, and the charge will continue to be adjusted based on the market price of the Companys stock until final Court approval of the settlement. We believe that we have adequately reserved for this matter as of April 1, 2005. See Note 5 for further discussion.
12
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Fiscal Quarter-End
Our fiscal quarters consist of 13-weeks ending on a Friday so that our fiscal year ends on the last Friday of the calendar year. Our fiscal quarters referenced herein refer to the periods ended April 1, 2005, December 31, 2004 and March 26, 2004.
For the first quarter of 2005, we posted a loss of $0.13 per share compared to a loss of $0.05 per share in the first quarter of 2004. Revenues declined in the first quarter of 2005 by 15.7% to $42.2 million as compared $50.0 million in the first quarter of 2004. The revenue decline reflects changes in the timing and size of certain customer product launches and subscription cycles, lower seasonal sell through for one of our retail customers, and generally softer demand from our PC OEM customers.
General Factors Affecting Our Financial Results
Revenue. We derive our revenues from a wide variety of supply chain services provided to our customers. The number of CD and DVD media units that we replicate for our customers, changes in pricing, changes in the composition of the products and services we provide, consumer demand for our customers products, seasonal consumer buying patterns, and changes in the mix of customers we serve, are all factors that contribute to fluctuations in our revenues from period to period. Revenues are generally more favorably impacted when our mix of customers is weighted toward those who are using a broad range of our services. Bundled pricing, changes in the content of the products we make for our customers and other market dynamics make it difficult to precisely determine the impact each of these factors has on changes in our total revenue.
Gross Profit Percentage. Our gross profit percentage during a period is dependent on a number of factors. Changes in raw material prices, particularly polycarbonate, a petroleum-based plastic used in the manufacturing of CD and DVD media, can impact margins. While polycarbonate pricing had been relatively stable over the past few years,
13
increases in petroleum prices and supply constraints that began in the first half of 2004 are continuing to put upward pressure on polycarbonate pricing and are negatively impacting our gross profit margins. In addition to changes in pricing and raw material costs, the volume of business we experience in a given period also impacts our margins. A large portion of the costs required to deliver our products and services are fixed in nature. Increases in business volume allow us to leverage these costs resulting in higher gross profit margins, while decreases in volume have the opposite effect. Our relative mix of customers, as well as the related content of products or services we provide them, can also have a significant impact on gross profit margins. For example, the relative mix of CD/DVD media, labor, print and other material in the products we produce for our customers can affect our overall gross profit percentage. Although gross profit measured as a percentage of revenue may be lower, we believe providing incremental, value-added services to our customers, has an overall positive effect on gross margin as measured in dollars. Additionally, our ability to utilize automated packaging equipment versus manual labor can have a favorable effect on gross profit.
Selling General and Administrative (SG&A) Expenses. A substantial portion of our SG&A expenses are fixed in nature. However, certain components such as incentive compensation, professional services, travel and other expenses can vary based on business results, individual events, or initiatives we may be pursuing at various times throughout the year. In addition to these factors, some of our SG&A expenses are incurred in Ireland and Canada and changes in the respective foreign currency rates can cause our expenses reported in U.S. dollars to fluctuate.
Results of Operations
The following table summarizes certain key information to aid in the understanding of our discussion and analysis of results of operations.
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
||
|
|
April 1, |
|
March 26, |
|
Percent of Revenue: |
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
4.3 |
% |
13.9 |
% |
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
24.2 |
|
18.8 |
|
Restructuring costs |
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
Litigation reserve adjustment |
|
(4.3 |
) |
|
|
Operating loss |
|
(16.2 |
) |
(4.9 |
) |
Other income, net |
|
0.8 |
|
0.3 |
|
Income tax benefit |
|
5.5 |
|
1.5 |
|
Net loss |
|
(9.8 |
) |
(3.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Operating Statistics: |
|
|
|
|
|
Media units sold - % change from prior year period |
|
(18.9 |
)% |
(6.5 |
)% |
Revenue - % change from prior year period |
|
(15.7 |
)% |
5.9 |
% |
SG&A expenses - % change from prior year period |
|
(8.7 |
)% |
2.4 |
% |
Effective tax rate |
|
36.0 |
% |
32.7 |
% |
Note: As previously disclosed in our 2004 Form 10-K, we have restated our first quarter 2004 consolidated financial statements for misstatements in financial results discovered in our Ireland subsidiary. These restatements primarily affected cost of revenue and selling, general and administrative expenses and resulted in an increase of our first quarter 2004 loss per share from ($0.03) to ($0.05). See Note 7 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion of this restatement.
Revenue
Our first quarter 2005 revenue decreased to $42.2 million, representing a 15.7% decrease from revenue of $50.0 million in the first quarter of 2004. Media unit volume decreased 18.9% over the same period driving our revenues downward. The decrease in revenue and media units sold is primarily the result of the following general business factors:
The timing and size of certain customer product launches and subscription cycles versus the first quarter of 2004;
A decrease in the seasonal sell through for one of our retail customers;
Generally softer demand from our PC OEM customers;
14
Customer pricing reductions; and
Content shifts from CD media to DVD media by certain customers;
Our volumes with Microsoft and Dell continue to drive significant amounts of our overall revenue. First quarter revenue with Dell comprised approximately 21% of our total revenue in 2005 as compared to 19% in 2004. First quarter business with Microsoft, which remains our largest customer, generated approximately 23% of our total revenue in 2005 as compared to 24% in 2004.
Gross Profit
Our reported first quarter gross profit percentage fell 9.6% from 13.9% in 2004 to 4.3% in 2005. The decrease is primarily attributable to lower capacity utilization resulting in higher fixed costs as a percentage of revenue, operational deficiencies in our Ireland manufacturing facility, changes in customer and product mix, the effects of customer pricing reductions, and increases in the price of polycarbonate, a petroleum-based plastic that is the primary raw material used in the manufacturing of CD and DVD media. Since the first quarter of 2004, petroleum price increases and supply shortages have nearly doubled the price of polycarbonate. While we have entered into a purchase agreement with our polycarbonate supplier that limits price increases and ensures adequate supply for our anticipated first half 2005 production, the increases allowed under the agreement have had a negative impact on our gross profit. Polycarbonate cost increases accounted for an estimated decline of $0.9 million in our gross profit margins or 2.0% of revenues as compared to 2004. This decline includes the offsetting effect of a one cent surcharge on CD and DVD media passed on to our customers beginning in the fourth quarter of 2004.
Selling, General and Administrative (SG&A) Expenses
SG&A expenses in the first quarter increased 0.8 million, or 8.7%, from $9.4 million in 2004 to $10.2 million in 2005. Our professional fees for the first quarter of 2005 increased approximately $0.7 million over the same period in 2004 as a result of additional audit work for the previously disclosed Ireland restatement and related controls testing for Sarbanes Oxley compliance. In addition, our first quarter 2005 SG&A expense includes incremental costs related to terminated acquisition activities.
Restructuring Costs
As discussed above in the Introduction and Overview in this Item 2, we have begun to implement an operational plan aimed at ensuring profitability at or near the level of revenue we experienced in the first quarter of 2005. In conjunction with this plan we have incurred approximately $0.2 million in restructuring costs as of April 1, 2005.
Litigation Reserve Adjustment
As previously disclosed in our filings with the SEC, we have been the subject of an SEC investigation and a consolidated class action lawsuit involving allegations of securities law violations. The allegations relate to Company disclosures and certain stock sales by two former officers during the third quarter of the year 2000. Under FASB Statement No. 5, Accounting for Contingencies, and FASB Interpretation No. 14, Reasonable Estimation of the Amount of a Loss, an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 5, we reassessed our established reserves to reflect our estimate of the related minimum expected probable losses that would result from settlement offers made by the Company. A portion of these reserves represents the proposed issuance of 1,500,000 shares of the Companys common stock which is valued based on the market price of the stock as of the end of each reporting period. Accordingly, during the quarter ended April 1, 2005, we reduced the reserve by approximately $1.9 million representing the decrease in the market value of these shares from $6.2 million at December 31, 2004 to $4.3 million at April 1, 2005. Subsequent to the end of the fiscal quarter, we announced, without admission of liability, an agreement to settle the outstanding class action lawsuit. See Note 8 to the consolidated financial statements for further discussion of the details of the class action settlement agreement.
Income Taxes
The increase in our effective tax rate from 2004 to 2005 reflects changes relative to 2004 in our estimated annual 2005 taxable earnings and losses in each of the tax jurisdictions in which we operate.
Application of Critical Accounting Policies
Our discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based upon our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The preparation of these financial statements requires estimation and judgment that affect the
15
reported amounts of revenues, expenses, assets and liabilities. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Following are our most critical accounting policies that affect significant areas and involve judgment and estimates. If these estimates differ materially from actual results, the impact to the consolidated financial statements may be material.
Revenue Recognition. We record revenue at the time product is shipped or as services are rendered. For certain customers, product is invoiced upon completion of production and assembly services, with final shipment occurring based on written customer instructions. In these cases, the customer accepts title to the goods as of the date of the invoice and revenue is recognized. In each case of these bill and hold sales, we ensure that the transaction complies with the conditions and considerations contained in Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 101 and Accounting and Auditing Enforcement Release No. 108 of the Securities and Exchange Commission.
During the first quarters of 2005 and 2004, one customer accounted for approximately 23% and 24%, respectively, of our consolidated revenue, and a second customer accounted for approximately 21% and 19%, respectively, of our consolidated revenue.
Cost of Revenue. We include direct labor, direct materials, royalties and production overhead, which includes shipping costs, in cost of revenue on the consolidated statements of operations.
Royalties. We have license agreements with several companies for the use of certain CD and DVD manufacturing technology we use in our business. We do not necessarily have agreements with every patent holder that may assert or has asserted a claim to royalties. The cost of these royalties is accrued based on units sold and charged to cost of revenue. Our royalty costs are based upon the terms of our royalty agreements as well as our assessment of the applicability of any other known or potential royalties.
Income Taxes. We account for income taxes in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes. As part of the process of preparing our consolidated financial statements, we are required to estimate our income taxes in each of the jurisdictions in which we operate. This process involves estimating our current tax exposure together with assessing temporary differences resulting from differing treatment of items for tax and accounting purposes. These temporary differences result in deferred tax assets and liabilities, which are included within our consolidated balance sheet. We must then assess the likelihood that our deferred tax assets will be recovered from future taxable income and to the extent we believe that recovery is not likely, we must establish a valuation allowance. To the extent we establish a valuation allowance or change this allowance in a period, we must include an expense or a benefit within the tax provision in our statement of operations.
Significant judgment is required in determining our provision for income taxes, our deferred tax assets and liabilities and any valuation allowance recorded against our deferred tax assets. At April 1, 2005 and December 31, 2004, we had a valuation allowance of $2.3 million, due to the uncertainty of realizing the benefits of certain loss carryforwards before they expire. The valuation allowance was based on our historical taxable income and our estimates of future taxable income in each jurisdiction in which we operate and the period over which our deferred tax assets will be recoverable. We will continue to assess the likelihood that the deferred tax assets will be realizable and the valuation allowance will be adjusted accordingly, which could materially impact our financial position and results of operations.
Our effective tax rate for interim reporting periods represents our best current estimate of our effective tax rate for the full year, which requires estimates of full year income or losses across each of the tax jurisdictions in which we operate. These estimates may change throughout the year resulting in potentially significant changes to our overall effective tax rate due to the effect of differences in the tax rates in each jurisdiction. In addition, the preparation of our income tax returns requires the interpretation of the associated tax laws. Many tax laws are complex, and at times ambiguous, and our interpretations of these laws may differ from the interpretations of the taxing authorities who have the right to audit our returns within statutory time periods. Where we believe there is a quantifiable risk that our interpretations of these laws could reasonably differ from those of the taxing authorities, we make appropriate provisions in our tax liabilities.
Accounts Receivable. We review our accounts receivable balances on a regular basis to determine their collectability. An allowance for doubtful accounts is recorded based on managements estimate of those accounts which may become uncollectible.
Inventory. We review our inventory on a regular basis with the objective of assessing its net realizable value. We adjust the carrying value of inventory according to our estimates of the net realizable value of individual inventory components relative to their purchase or carrying value.
16
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
See Note 1 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) included in Item 1 herein for a discussion of new accounting standards.
17
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Cash and Cash Equivalents and Short-Term Available-for-Sale Securities. As of April 1, 2005, cash and cash equivalents and short-term available-for-sale securities totaled $59.7 million, a decrease of $0.6 million from December 31, 2004. During the quarter cash flows used in operating activities totaled $0.1 million while the remainder of the overall decrease is related to capital expenditures totaling $0.5 million.
Working Capital and Liquidity. Working capital totaled $78.2 million and $83.3 million at April 1, 2005 and December 31, 2004, respectively. This decrease primarily reflects the operating losses incurred in the first quarter. Our principal source of working capital continues to be cash and cash equivalents and short-term available-for-sale securities. In addition to our working capital balances, we also hold long term available-for-sale securities which represent our investment in Intraware (see Note 5 to the Consolidated Financial Statements). These securities are registered and readily tradable and had a market value at April 1, 2005 of $1.7 million.
Our future liquidity needs will depend on, among other factors, the timing of capital expenditures, expenditures in connection with possible acquisitions and the timing of our ability to return the business to profitability. We believe that existing cash and investment balances and anticipated cash flow from operations will be sufficient to fund our operations for the foreseeable future.
Contractual Obligations. During the second quarter of 2004, we entered into an agreement with our supplier of polycarbonate, a petroleum-based commodity which is the primary raw material used in the production of CD and DVD media. Beginning in the first half of 2004, supply shortages and increases in petroleum prices have placed significant upward pressure on polycarbonate pricing. Under the agreement, which runs through June 2005, we have agreed to purchase 9.4 million pounds of polycarbonate at set price terms. These price terms restrict monthly price increases and help us to limit our exposure to potential future price increases while also allowing us to reduce our purchase volume should the price terms increase above an agreed-upon level over the initial base price. Minimum remaining commitments under this agreement, subject to purchase volume reductions, are approximately $3.7 million based on the current adjusted base price and minimum remaining quantity. We believe that this agreement will allow us to minimize our near-term exposure to continuing upward price pressures on this key raw material.
Outlook
Given the dynamic market conditions in which we operate, our ability to accurately predict revenue and earnings for a given time period is difficult. Any predictions made are subject to managements interpretation of all of the data available, and may not directly reflect forecasts produced internally within any individual forecast. We have very limited visibility to our customers near or long-term demand for our services, and changes by our customers in the content of the products we produce for them can significantly affect our levels of reported revenue and related profits.
As previously discussed in our filings with the SEC, starting in the second quarter of 2004, we were informed of changes to certain programs we support for several of our large customers that may result in noticeable future declines in the level of business we currently have with these customers. The first of these customer-driven changes involves the elimination of certain recovery CDs and printed materials from some of the new PCs sold by one of our PC OEM customers. The implementation dates communicated to us have changed several times but will begin to impact our revenues more significantly with this customer starting in the second quarter of 2005. Throughout 2005, we expect that this continuing initiative will negatively impact our revenues with this customer. While growth in other segments of our business with this customer provides an opportunity to offset some of this decline, we are not assured of the timing or extent of those opportunities. We had also been informed in 2004 by one of our larger customers that, possibly starting in 2005, a certain portion of their customer base supported by us will be migrated to a new service delivery system operated by one of our competitors. Due to the uncertainties surrounding this potential change, we are unable at this time to accurately quantify its future affect on our business. However, this change could have a significant impact on our future revenues and profitability should it be fully and permanently implemented in a manner that excludes our participation in the delivery of this revenue stream. Finally, in addition to these and other market changes, our customers continue to demand general pricing decreases in the services we provide. Our ability to grow or achieve consistent levels of revenue may be impacted by our ability or willingness to perform our services at prices acceptable to the market place.
Beginning in the first half of 2004, supply shortages and petroleum price increases have placed significant upward pressures on the price of polycarbonate, a petroleum-based plastic that is the primary raw material used in the manufacturing of CD and DVD media. While we have entered into a purchase agreement with our polycarbonate supplier that limits price increases through June of this year, the increases allowed under the agreement have had, and
18
will continue to have, a negative impact on our gross profit margins. While we will be working with our customers in 2005 to pass on to them some or all of these cost increases, there are no assurances that we will be successful in doing so or that our attempts to pass along these cost increases will not result in a loss of business to competitors.
We continue to face significant costs and resource focus on complying with the necessary reporting, compliance and administrative aspects of a public company. These requirements drive additional SG&A costs for professional services, both legal and accounting, governance, and management requirements to support all of the additional legislation imposed on public companies. Many of our competitors are not public entities or are larger public entities and the related impact of complying with these requirements can affect our ability to perform competitively.
As discussed in the section captioned Introduction and Overview above, we have begun the first phase of a plan that includes both cost reduction activities as well the implementation of pricing strategies with an overall goal of profitability at or near the level of revenue we experienced in the first quarter of 2005. Execution of this plan has begun. However it is difficult at this time to predict with certainty the final timing and costs associated with its implementation and whether the resulting impact of these initiatives will have a further negative impact on our ability to achieve these revenue levels. Our goal is to have completed a significant portion of this plan by the beginning of our third quarter of 2005.
In light of the discussion above, we are forecasting revenues in the second quarter of 2005 to be comparable to the first quarter of 2005 and our net loss to be in the range of ($0.14) per share to ($0.20) per share including restructuring charges related to our cost reduction activities, or ($0.09) per share to ($0.13) per share excluding these charges.
Cautionary Statement for Purposes of the Safe Harbor Provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995
19
We are dependent on a small number of key customers in the personal computer (PC) hardware and software industries.
We may not be able to effectively compete in an increasingly competitive environment.
We have experienced increasing costs of polycarbonate, a petroleum-based raw material used in the manufacture of optical media.
We may not be able to maintain our status as a Microsoft Authorized Replicator.
We may not be able to meet our customers requirements regarding the security of their intellectual property, inventory and other assets.
We are dependent on revenues from the replication of CD and DVD media which may be threatened by the development and rate of market acceptance of new media storage techniques or other electronic media technologies.
We have been issued a Wells Notice from the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and have been named as a defendant in a lawsuit alleging certain securities laws violations.
We concluded that our internal controls over financial reporting were not operating effectively as of December 31, 2004.
We undertake no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements we make in this report due to new information or future events. Investors are advised to consult any further disclosures we make on this subject in our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, especially on Forms 10-K, 10-Q and 8-K, in which we discuss in more detail various important factors that could cause actual results to differ from expected or historical results.
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Foreign Currency. A portion of our operations are located in Ireland and Canada. The financial results of these operations are translated to US dollars at current exchange rates. Changes in exchange rates between periods can affect the comparability of results reported in US dollars.
In addition to these translation gains and losses, we also incur transaction gains and losses which are reflected in our financial statements. A majority of the sales from our Canadian operations, and a large portion of the related costs, are denominated in US dollars. As a result, we have limited exposure to the Canadian currency. The majority of sales revenues and related costs in our Ireland operations are denominated in Euros. Foreign currency transaction gains and losses historically have not been material to our results of operations or our financial condition. However, we anticipate we will continue to incur exchange gains and losses from foreign operations in the future. These gains and losses may be
20
significant depending on factors such as changes in foreign currency or weak economic conditions in foreign markets. In addition, demand for our products and services can be impacted by the value primarily of the U.S. dollar relative to other currencies.
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
(a) Disclosure controls and procedures
As of the end of the period covered by this report, the Company conducted an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of the Companys chief executive officer and chief financial officer, of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934). In light of the material weakness in the Companys internal control over financial reporting in the supervision and oversight of accounting personnel at the Companys Ireland subsidiary, Zomax, Ltd. (Zomax Ireland) as discussed below and as reported in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004, the chief executive officer and chief financial officer concluded that, as of April 1, 2005, the Companys disclosure controls and procedures were not effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in reports that it files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in SEC rules and forms.
(b) Change in internal control over financial reporting
The Company is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. The Companys internal control system was designed to provide reasonable assurance to the Companys management and the board of directors regarding the preparation and fair presentation of published financial statements.
All internal control systems, no matter how well designed, have inherent limitations. Therefore, even those systems determined effective can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation.
As of December 31, 2004, the Companys assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting identified a material weakness in the Companys internal control over financial reporting in the supervision and oversight of accounting personnel at the Companys Ireland subsidiary, Zomax, Ltd. (Zomax Ireland). Specifically, there was insufficient review of journal entries and account reconciliations prepared by Zomax Ireland accounting personnel, and Company accounting policies communicated to Zomax Ireland were not followed. The aforementioned material weakness in internal control permitted (i) the intentional recording of incorrect accounting entries by local accounting personnel, (ii) the inadequate preparation and review of certain balance sheet account reconciliations, and (iii) failure of Zomax Ireland to follow certain Company accounting policies.
During the first quarter of 2005, the Company has implemented the following remediation steps to address the material weakness discussed above:
The former Ireland financial controller has been replaced by an individual with appropriate experience and qualifications.
Our corporate operations controller has been assigned to directly oversee and implement changes to the monthly financial close process in Zomax Ireland. These changes include the implementation of appropriate journal entry reviews, balance sheet reconciliation processes and procedures to ensure Company policies are followed.
Additionally, the Company has begun to implement the following remediation steps to further address the material weakness in the Companys internal control over financial reporting discussed above:
We are evaluating the establishment of an internal audit program in 2005.
We continue to assess our global financial organization structure for possible staffing and structural changes. The assessment is focused toward better positioning the organizations ability to supervise and oversee the performance and compliance of all aspects of the financial reporting and control requirements necessary for support of the Company.
We will establish owners of all primary business processes across our global operations who will be responsible for ensuring formalized policies and procedures are created and that employees are properly trained on these policies. This training will emphasize employees general understanding of our control system with particular attention to their responsibility for the integrity of the control procedures within their respective operations.
21
The Company believes that, once fully implemented, these remediation steps will correct the material weakness discussed above.
Except as discussed above, there were no changes in the Companys internal control over financial reporting during its most recently completed fiscal quarter that have materially affected or are reasonably likely to materially affect its internal control over financial reporting, as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act.
22
See Note 5 to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 1 of Part I of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
In addition to the proceedings described in Item 1 of Part I of this Quarterly Report, we are a party to various other suits, claims and proceedings arising in the ordinary course of our business and we intend to vigorously defend them. The amount of monetary liability, if any, resulting from an adverse outcome in any of such suits, proceedings and claims in which we are a defendant cannot be determined at this time. However, in the opinion of our management, the aggregate amount of liability under these other s uits, proceedings and claims will not have a material adverse effect on our consolidated results of operations, financial condition or cash flows.
The following exhibits are filed with this Report:
31.1 Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
31.2 Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
32.1 Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
32.2 Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
23
In accordance with the requirements of the Exchange Act, the registrant caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
Date: May 11, 2005 |
|
ZOMAX INCORPORATED |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By: |
/s/ Anthony Angelini |
|
|
Anthony
Angelini, President and Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By: |
/s/ Robert J. Rueckl |
|
|
Robert
J. Rueckl, Executive Vice President and Chief |
24
ZOMAX INCORPORATED
FORM 10-Q FOR QUARTER ENDED APRIL 1, 2005
Exhibit |
|
Description |
|
|
|
31.1 |
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act |
31.2 |
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act |
32.1 |
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act |
32.2 |
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act |
25