UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
ý QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934.
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2005
OR
o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934.
Commission File Number 0-18832
First Financial Service Corporation
(Exact Name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
Kentucky |
|
61-1168311 |
(State or other jurisdiction |
|
(IRS Employer Identification No.) |
of incorporation or organization) |
|
|
|
|
|
2323 Ring Road
Elizabethtown, Kentucky 42701
(Address of principal executive offices)
(Zip Code)
(270) 765-2131
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes ý No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes ý No o
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.
Class |
|
Outstanding as of April 30, 2005 |
|
|
|
Common Stock |
|
3,648,188 shares |
|
|
|
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION |
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
Changes In Securities, Use of Proceeds and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
SIGNATURES |
|
|
|
|
|
CERTIFICATIONS |
|
|
|
|
|
2
Item 1.FIRST FINANCIAL SERVICE CORPORATION
Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
|
||
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
||
(Dollars in thousands, except share data) |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
||
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Cash and due from banks |
|
$ |
18,900 |
|
$ |
27,910 |
|
Federal funds sold |
|
10,000 |
|
8,000 |
|
||
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
28,900 |
|
35,910 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Securities available-for-sale |
|
38,130 |
|
21,928 |
|
||
Securities held-to-maturity, fair value of $33,794 Mar (2005) |
|
|
|
|
|
||
and $34,557 Dec (2004) |
|
34,539 |
|
34,915 |
|
||
Total securities |
|
72,669 |
|
56,843 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Loans held for sale |
|
721 |
|
1,219 |
|
||
Loans receivable, net of unearned fees |
|
599,846 |
|
604,698 |
|
||
Allowance for loan losses |
|
(6,701 |
) |
(6,489 |
) |
||
Net loans receivable |
|
593,866 |
|
599,428 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Federal Home Loan Bank stock |
|
6,921 |
|
6,845 |
|
||
Cash surrender value of life insurance |
|
7,425 |
|
7,353 |
|
||
Premises and equipment, net |
|
18,080 |
|
17,469 |
|
||
Real estate owned: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Acquired through foreclosure |
|
913 |
|
681 |
|
||
Held for development |
|
389 |
|
389 |
|
||
Other repossessed assets |
|
59 |
|
40 |
|
||
Goodwill |
|
8,384 |
|
8,384 |
|
||
Accrued interest receivable |
|
2,563 |
|
2,487 |
|
||
Other assets |
|
2,302 |
|
1,817 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
TOTAL ASSETS |
|
$ |
742,471 |
|
$ |
737,646 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY LIABILITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Deposits: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Non-interest bearing |
|
$ |
39,961 |
|
$ |
38,441 |
|
Interest bearing |
|
549,088 |
|
547,945 |
|
||
Total deposits |
|
589,049 |
|
586,386 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Advances from Federal Home Loan Bank |
|
78,860 |
|
78,904 |
|
||
Subordinated debentures |
|
10,000 |
|
10,000 |
|
||
Accrued interest payable |
|
393 |
|
413 |
|
||
Accounts payable and other liabilities |
|
1,943 |
|
637 |
|
||
Deferred income taxes |
|
1,291 |
|
1,505 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
TOTAL LIABILITIES |
|
681,536 |
|
677,845 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Serial preferred stock, 5,000,000 shares |
|
|
|
|
|
||
authorized and unissued |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Common stock, $1 par value per share; authorized 10,000,000 shares; issued and outstanding, 3,648,188 shares Mar (2005), and 3,645,438 shares Dec (2004) |
|
3,648 |
|
3,645 |
|
||
Additional paid-in capital |
|
8,280 |
|
8,226 |
|
||
Retained earnings |
|
48,666 |
|
47,174 |
|
||
Accumulated other comprehensive |
|
|
|
|
|
||
income, net of tax |
|
341 |
|
756 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
TOTAL STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
60,935 |
|
59,801 |
|
||
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
$ |
742,471 |
|
$ |
737,646 |
|
See notes to the unaudited consolidated financial statements.
3
FIRST FINANCIAL SERVICE CORPORATION
Consolidated Statements of Income
(Unaudited)
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
||||
|
|
March 31, |
|
||||
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data) |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
||
Interest Income: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Interest and fees on loans |
|
$ |
9,954 |
|
$ |
9,107 |
|
Interest and dividends on investments and deposits |
|
676 |
|
443 |
|
||
Total interest income |
|
10,630 |
|
9,550 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Interest Expense: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Deposits |
|
2,892 |
|
2,725 |
|
||
Federal Home Loan Bank advances |
|
944 |
|
928 |
|
||
Subordinated debentures |
|
158 |
|
124 |
|
||
Total interest expense |
|
3,994 |
|
3,777 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Net interest income |
|
6,636 |
|
5,773 |
|
||
Provision for loan losses |
|
275 |
|
389 |
|
||
Net interest income after provision for loan losses |
|
6,361 |
|
5,384 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Non-interest Income: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Customer service fees on deposit accounts |
|
1,120 |
|
1,135 |
|
||
Gain on sale of mortgage loans |
|
184 |
|
218 |
|
||
Brokerage commissions |
|
78 |
|
94 |
|
||
Gain on sale of investments |
|
381 |
|
|
|
||
Other income |
|
258 |
|
324 |
|
||
Total non-interest income |
|
2,021 |
|
1,771 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Non-interest Expense: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Employee compensation and benefits |
|
2,778 |
|
2,398 |
|
||
Office occupancy expense and equipment |
|
494 |
|
408 |
|
||
Marketing and advertising |
|
188 |
|
139 |
|
||
Outside services and data processing |
|
597 |
|
514 |
|
||
Bank franchise tax |
|
203 |
|
212 |
|
||
Other expense |
|
884 |
|
768 |
|
||
Total non-interest expense |
|
5,144 |
|
4,439 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Income before income taxes |
|
3,238 |
|
2,716 |
|
||
Income taxes |
|
1,052 |
|
878 |
|
||
Net Income |
|
$ |
2,186 |
|
$ |
1,838 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Shares applicable to basic income per share |
|
3,647,500 |
|
3,690,438 |
|
||
Basic income per share |
|
$ |
0.60 |
|
$ |
0.50 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Shares applicable to diluted income per share |
|
3,665,496 |
|
3,708,063 |
|
||
Diluted income per share |
|
$ |
0.60 |
|
$ |
0.50 |
|
See notes to the unaudited consolidated financial statements.
4
FIRST FINANCIAL SERVICE CORPORATION
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income
(Unaudited)
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
||||
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Net Income |
|
$ |
2,186 |
|
$ |
1,838 |
|
Other comprehensive income (loss): |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Change in unrealized gain (loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
||
on securities |
|
(248 |
) |
41 |
|
||
Reclassification of realized amount |
|
(381 |
) |
|
|
||
Net unrealized gain (loss) recognized in |
|
|
|
|
|
||
comprehensive income |
|
(629 |
) |
41 |
|
||
Tax effect |
|
214 |
|
(14 |
) |
||
Total other comphrehensive income (loss) |
|
(415 |
) |
27 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Comphrehensive Income |
|
$ |
1,771 |
|
$ |
1,865 |
|
See notes to the unaudited consolidated financial statements.
5
FIRST FINANCIAL SERVICE CORPORATION
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders Equity
Three Months Ended March 31, 2005
(Dollars In Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated Other |
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional |
|
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
Common Stock |
|
Paid-in |
|
Retained |
|
Income, Net of |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
Shares |
|
Amount |
|
Capital |
|
Earnings |
|
Tax |
|
Total |
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Balance, December 31, 2004 |
|
3,645 |
|
$ |
3,645 |
|
$ |
8,226 |
|
$ |
47,174 |
|
$ |
756 |
|
$ |
59,801 |
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,186 |
|
|
|
2,186 |
|
|||||
Exercise of stock options |
|
3 |
|
3 |
|
54 |
|
|
|
|
|
57 |
|
|||||
Net change in unrealized gains (losses) on securities available- for-sale, net of tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(415 |
) |
(415 |
) |
|||||
Cash dividends declared ($.19 per share) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(694 |
) |
|
|
(694 |
) |
|||||
Stock repurchased |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Balance, March 31, 2005 |
|
3,648 |
|
$ |
3,648 |
|
$ |
8,280 |
|
$ |
48,666 |
|
$ |
341 |
|
$ |
60,935 |
|
See notes to the unaudited consolidated financial statements.
6
FIRST FINANCIAL SERVICE CORPORATION
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(Dollars In Thousands)
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
||||
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
||
Operating Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Net income |
|
$ |
2,186 |
|
$ |
1,838 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Provision for loan losses |
|
275 |
|
389 |
|
||
Depreciation on premises and equipment |
|
301 |
|
244 |
|
||
Federal Home Loan Bank stock dividends |
|
(76 |
) |
(66 |
) |
||
Net amortization (accretion) |
|
106 |
|
9 |
|
||
Gain on sale of investments available-for-sale |
|
(381 |
) |
|
|
||
Gain on sale of mortgage loans |
|
(184 |
) |
(218 |
) |
||
Origination of loans held for sale |
|
(9,758 |
) |
(11,893 |
) |
||
Proceeds on sale of loans held for sale |
|
10,440 |
|
11,769 |
|
||
Changes in: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Cash surrender value of life insurance |
|
(72 |
) |
(70 |
) |
||
Interest receivable |
|
(76 |
) |
167 |
|
||
Other assets |
|
(486 |
) |
(994 |
) |
||
Interest payable |
|
(20 |
) |
(18 |
) |
||
Accounts payable and other liabilities |
|
1,306 |
|
566 |
|
||
Net cash from operating activities |
|
3,561 |
|
1,723 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Investing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Sales of securities available-for-sale |
|
1,431 |
|
|
|
||
Purchases of securities available-for-sale |
|
(18,185 |
) |
|
|
||
Purchases of securities held-to-maturity |
|
|
|
(10,000 |
) |
||
Maturities of securities held-to-maturity |
|
574 |
|
16,365 |
|
||
Net change in loans |
|
4,539 |
|
(15,278 |
) |
||
Net purchases of premises and equipment |
|
(912 |
) |
(1,335 |
) |
||
Net cash from investing activities |
|
(12,553 |
) |
(10,248 |
) |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Financing Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Net change in deposits |
|
2,663 |
|
11,685 |
|
||
Repayments to Federal Home Loan Bank |
|
(44 |
) |
(73 |
) |
||
Proceeds from stock options exercised |
|
57 |
|
|
|
||
Dividends paid |
|
(694 |
) |
(667 |
) |
||
Common stock repurchased |
|
|
|
(1,560 |
) |
||
Net cash from financing activities |
|
1,982 |
|
9,385 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
(Decrease) Increase in cash and cash equivalents |
|
(7,010 |
) |
860 |
|
||
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period |
|
35,910 |
|
48,030 |
|
||
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period |
|
$ |
28,900 |
|
$ |
48,890 |
|
See notes to the unaudited consolidated financial statements.
7
Notes To Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
1. BASIS OF PRESENTATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Basis of Presentation The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements include the accounts of First Financial Service Corporation and its wholly owned subsidiary, First Federal Savings Bank. First Federal Savings Bank has three wholly owned subsidiaries, First Service Corporation of Elizabethtown, First Heartland Mortgage Company and First Federal Office Park, LLC. Unless the text clearly suggests otherwise, references to us, we, or our include First Financial Service Corporation and its wholly-owned subsidiary. All significant intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated.
The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Rule 10-01 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. Operating results for the three-month period ending March 31, 2005 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may occur for the year ending December 31, 2005. For further information, refer to the consolidated financial statements and footnotes thereto included in the Corporations annual report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2004.
Stock Option Plans Employee compensation expense under stock option plans is reported using the intrinsic value method. No stock-based compensation cost is reflected in net income, as all options granted had an exercise price equal to the market price of the underlying common stock at date of grant. The following table illustrates the effect on net income and earnings per share if expense was measured using the fair value recognition provisions of FASB Statement No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation.
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
||||
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
||
|
|
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data) |
|
||||
Net income: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
As reported |
|
$ |
2,186 |
|
$ |
1,838 |
|
Deduct: Stock-based compensation expense |
|
|
|
|
|
||
determined under fair value based method |
|
(33 |
) |
(31 |
) |
||
Pro-forma |
|
$ |
2,153 |
|
$ |
1,807 |
|
Earnings per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Basic As Reported |
|
$ |
0.60 |
|
$ |
0.50 |
|
Pro-forma |
|
0.59 |
|
0.49 |
|
||
Diluted As Reported |
|
$ |
0.60 |
|
$ |
0.50 |
|
Pro-forma |
|
0.59 |
|
0.49 |
|
Effect of Newly Issued But Not Yet Effective Accounting Standards In December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (SFAS) No. 123 (Revised 2004) (SFAS No. 123R), Share-Based Payment. SFAS No. 123R is a revision of FASB Statement 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation and supersedes APB Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, and its related implementation guidance. SFAS No. 123R requires all public companies to record compensation cost for stock options provided to employees in return for employee service. The cost is measured at the fair value of the options when granted, and this cost is expensed over the employee service period, which is normally the vesting period of the options. This will apply to awards granted or modified for the year beginning January 1, 2006. Compensation cost will also be recorded for prior option grants that vest after the date of adoption. The effect on results of operations will depend on the level of future option grants and the calculation of the fair value of the options granted at such future date, as well as the vesting periods provided, and so they cannot currently be predicted. Existing options that will vest after adoption date are expected to result in additional compensation expense of approximately $66,000 in 2006, $60,000 in 2007, $60,000 in 2008 and $45,000 in 2009. There will be no significant effect on financial position as total equity will not change.
8
Reclassifications Certain amounts have been reclassified in the prior period financial statements to conform to the current period classifications.
2. SECURITIES
The amortized cost basis and fair values of securities are as follows:
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Amortized Cost |
|
Gross Unrealized Gains |
|
Gross Unrealized Losses |
|
Fair Value |
|
|||||
Securities available-for-sale: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
March 31, 2005: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
U. S. Treasury and agencies |
|
$ |
31,861 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
(117 |
) |
$ |
31,744 |
|
|
Mortgage-backed |
|
1,764 |
|
|
|
(52 |
) |
1,712 |
|
|||||
Equity |
|
1,033 |
|
653 |
|
|
|
1,686 |
|
|||||
State and municipal |
|
924 |
|
32 |
|
|
|
956 |
|
|||||
Corporate |
|
2,032 |
|
|
|
|
|
2,032 |
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total |
|
$ |
37,614 |
|
$ |
685 |
|
$ |
(169 |
) |
$ |
38,130 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
December 31, 2004: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
U. S. Treasury and agencies |
|
$ |
15,985 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
(56 |
) |
$ |
15,929 |
|
|
Mortgage-backed |
|
1,901 |
|
|
|
(22 |
) |
1,879 |
|
|||||
Equity |
|
1,898 |
|
1,181 |
|
|
|
3,079 |
|
|||||
State and municipal |
|
999 |
|
42 |
|
|
|
1,041 |
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total |
|
$ |
20,783 |
|
$ |
1,223 |
|
$ |
(78 |
) |
$ |
21,928 |
|
|
|
|
Amortized Cost |
|
Gross Unrecognized Gains |
|
Gross Unrecognized Losses |
|
Fair Value |
|
||||
Securities held-to-maturity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
March 31, 2005: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
U.S. Treasury and agencies |
|
$ |
26,094 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
(582 |
) |
$ |
25,512 |
|
Mortgage-backed |
|
6,445 |
|
6 |
|
(169 |
) |
6,282 |
|
||||
Corporate |
|
2,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
2,000 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Total |
|
$ |
34,539 |
|
$ |
6 |
|
$ |
(751 |
) |
$ |
33,794 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
December 31, 2004: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
U.S. Treasury and agencies |
|
$ |
26,095 |
|
$ |
3 |
|
$ |
(244 |
) |
$ |
25,854 |
|
Mortgage-backed |
|
6,820 |
|
7 |
|
(124 |
) |
6,703 |
|
||||
Corporate |
|
2,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
2,000 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Total |
|
$ |
34,915 |
|
$ |
10 |
|
$ |
(368 |
) |
$ |
34,557 |
|
9
3. LOANS RECEIVABLE
Loans receivable are summarized as follows:
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
March 31, 2005 |
|
December 31, 2004 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Commercial |
|
$ |
32,616 |
|
$ |
32,228 |
|
Real estate commercial |
|
305,840 |
|
302,567 |
|
||
Real estate construction |
|
9,515 |
|
10,850 |
|
||
Residential mortgage |
|
153,942 |
|
159,550 |
|
||
Consumer and home equity |
|
68,071 |
|
70,143 |
|
||
Indirect consumer |
|
31,167 |
|
30,798 |
|
||
Loans held for sale |
|
721 |
|
1,219 |
|
||
|
|
601,872 |
|
607,355 |
|
||
Less: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Net deferred loan origination fees |
|
(1,305 |
) |
(1,438 |
) |
||
Allowance for loan losses |
|
(6,701 |
) |
(6,489 |
) |
||
|
|
(8,006 |
) |
(7,927 |
) |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Loans Receivable |
|
$ |
593,866 |
|
$ |
599,428 |
|
The allowance for losses on loans is summarized as follows:
|
|
As of and For the Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
||||
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Balance, beginning of period |
|
$ |
6,489 |
|
$ |
5,568 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
275 |
|
389 |
|
||
Charge-offs |
|
(140 |
) |
(271 |
) |
||
Recoveries |
|
77 |
|
47 |
|
||
Balance, end of period |
|
$ |
6,701 |
|
$ |
5,733 |
|
Investment in impaired loans is summarized below. There were no impaired loans for the periods presented without an allowance allocation.
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
As of and For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2005 |
|
As of and For the Year Ended December 31, 2004 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
End of period impaired loans |
|
$ |
5,418 |
|
$ |
5,240 |
|
Amount of allowance for loan |
|
|
|
|
|
||
loss allocated |
|
1,022 |
|
928 |
|
||
10
We report non-performing loans as impaired. Our non-performing loans are as follows:
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
March 31, 2005 |
|
December 31, 2004 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Restructured |
|
$ |
3,185 |
|
$ |
3,218 |
|
Loans past due over 90 days still on accrual |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Non accrual loans |
|
2,233 |
|
2,022 |
|
||
Total |
|
$ |
5,418 |
|
$ |
5,240 |
|
4. EARNINGS PER SHARE
The reconciliation of the numerators and denominators of the basic and diluted EPS is as follows:
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
||||
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data) |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Net income available to common shareholders |
|
$ |
2,186 |
|
$ |
1,838 |
|
Basic EPS: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Weighted average common shares |
|
3,647 |
|
3,690 |
|
||
Diluted EPS: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Weighted average common shares |
|
3,647 |
|
3,690 |
|
||
Dilutive effect of stock options |
|
18 |
|
18 |
|
||
Weighted average common and incremental shares |
|
3,665 |
|
3,708 |
|
||
Earnings Per Share: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Basic |
|
$ |
0.60 |
|
$ |
0.50 |
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
0.60 |
|
$ |
0.50 |
|
Stock options for 10,000 shares of common stock were not included in the 2004 computation of diluted earnings per share because their impact was anti-dilutive.
Item 2.
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
We conduct operations in 14 full-service banking centers in six contiguous counties in Central Kentucky along the Interstate 65 corridor. Our market presence ranges from the major metropolitan market of Louisville in Jefferson County, Kentucky approximately 40 miles north of our headquarters in Elizabethtown, Kentucky to Hart County, Kentucky, approximately 30 miles south of Elizabethtown. Our market is supported by a diversified industry base and consists of a regional population of over 1 million.
We serve the needs and cater to the economic strengths of the local communities in which we operate and strive to provide a high level of personal and professional customer service. We offer a variety of financial services to our retail and commercial banking customers. These services include personal and corporate banking services and personal investment financial counseling services.
Through our personal investment financial counseling services, we offer a wide variety of mutual funds, equity investments, and fixed and variable annuities.
11
We invest in the wholesale capital markets through the management of our security portfolio and use various forms of wholesale funding. The security portfolio contains a variety of instruments, including callable debentures, taxable and non-taxable debentures, fixed and adjustable rate mortgage backed securities, and collateralized mortgage obligations.
Our results of operations depend primarily on net interest income, which is the difference between interest income we earn on loans, investment securities and other interest-earning assets and interest expense we pay on deposits and other interest-bearing liabilities. Our operations are also affected by non-interest income, such as service charges, insurance agency revenue, loan fees, gains and losses from the sale of mortgage loans and gains from the sale of real estate held for development. Our principal operating expenses, aside from interest expense, consist of compensation and employee benefits, occupancy costs, data processing expense and provisions for loan losses.
This discussion and analysis covers material changes in the financial condition since December 31, 2004 and material changes in the results of operations for the three-month period ending, March 31, 2005 as compared to 2004. It should be read in conjunction with Management Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2004.
We, like other financial companies, are subject to a number of risks, many of which are outside of managements control, though we strive to manage those risks while optimizing returns. Among the risks assumed are: (a) credit risk, which is the risk that loan and lease customers or other counter parties will be unable to perform their contractual obligations, (b) market risk, which is the risk that changes in market rates and prices will adversely affect our financial condition or results of operation, (c) liquidity risk, which is the risk that we will have insufficient cash or access to cash to meet our operating needs, and (d) operational risk, which is the risk of loss resulting from inadequate or failed internal processes, people, and systems, or from external events.
In addition to the other information included or incorporated by reference into this report, readers should consider that the following important factors, among others, could materially impact our business, future results of operations, and future cash flows.
(a) Credit Risk
We extend credit to a variety of customers based on internally set standards and the judgment of management. We manage the credit risk it takes through a program of underwriting standards that we follow, the review of certain credit decisions, and an on-going process of assessment of the quality of the credit we have already extended. There can be no assurance that our credit standards and our on-going process of credit assessment will protect us from significant credit losses.
Our loans and deposits are focused in central Kentucky and adverse economic conditions in that state, in particular, could negatively impact results from operations, cash flows, and financial condition. Adverse economic conditions and other factors, such as political or business development or natural hazards that may affect Kentucky, may reduce demand for credit or fee-based products and could negatively affect real estate and other collateral values, interest rate levels, and the availability of credit to refinance loans at or prior to maturity.
(b) Market Risk
Changes in interest rates could negatively impact our financial condition or results of operations.
Our results of operations depend substantially on net interest income, the difference between interest earned on interest-earning assets (such as investments and loans) and interest paid on interest-bearing liabilities (such as deposits and borrowings). Interest rates are highly sensitive to many factors, including governmental monetary policies and domestic and international economic and political conditions. Conditions such as inflation, recession, unemployment, money supply, and other factors beyond our control may also affect interest rates. If our interest-earning assets mature or reprice more quickly than interest-bearing liabilities in a given period, a decrease in market rates could adversely affect net interest income. Likewise, if interest-bearing liabilities mature or reprice more quickly than interest-earning assets in a given period, an increase in market rates could adversely affect net interest income.
Fixed-rate loans increase our exposure to interest rate risk in a rising rate environment because interest-bearing liabilities would be subject to repricing before assets become subject to repricing. Adjustable-rate loans decrease the
12
risk associated with changes in interest rates but involve other risks, such as the inability of borrowers to make higher payments in an increasing interest rate environment. At the same time, for secured loans, the marketability of the underlying collateral may be adversely affected by higher interests rates. In a declining interest rate environment, there may be an increase in prepayments on loans as the borrowers refinance their loans at lower interest rates. Under these circumstances, our results of operations could be negatively impacted.
When evaluating short-term interest rate risk exposure, the primary measurement represents scenarios that model a 200 basis point increasing (decreasing) parallel shift in rates over the next twelve-month period versus rates implied by the current yield curve. For the quarter ended March 31, 2005, that scenario modeled net interest income to be approximately 12.5% lower than the internal forecast of net interest income using the baseline scenario if rates were to decrease 200 basis points in a parallel shift and 9.3% higher than the internal forecast of net interest income using the baseline scenario if rates were to increase 200 basis points in a parallel shift.
Although fluctuations in market interest rates are neither completely predictable nor controllable, our Asset Liability Committee meets periodically to monitor our interest rate sensitivity position and oversee its financial risk management by establishing policies and operating limits. For further discussion, see the Asset/Liability Management and Market Risk section of Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
(c) Liquidity Risk
If we are unable to borrow funds through access to the capital markets, we may not be able to meet the cash flow requirements of our depositors and borrowers, or meet the operating cash needs of the Corporation to fund corporate expansion or other activities.
Liquidity policies and limits are established by the board of directors, with operating limits set by the Asset Liability Committee (ALCO), based upon analyses of the ratio of loans to deposits, the percentage of assets funded with non-core or wholesale funding. ALCO regularly monitors the overall liquidity position of the Bank and holding company to ensure that various alternative strategies exist to cover unanticipated events that could affect liquidity. Liquidity is the ability to meet cash flow needs on a timely basis at a reasonable cost. The liquidity of the Bank is used to make loans and to repay deposit liabilities as they become due or are demanded by customers. The ALCO establishes board approved policies and monitors guidelines to diversify our wholesale funding sources to avoid concentrations in any one-market source. Wholesale funding sources include Federal funds purchased, securities sold under repurchase agreements, non-core brokered deposits, and medium and long-term debt, which includes Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) advances that are collateralized with mortgage-related assets.
We maintain a portfolio of securities that can be used as a secondary source of liquidity. There are other sources of liquidity should they be needed. These include the sale or securitization of loans, the ability to acquire additional non-core brokered deposits, additional collateralized borrowings such as FHLB advances, the issuance of debt securities, and the issuance of preferred or common securities in public or private transactions.
If we were unable to access any of these funding sources when needed, we might be unable to meet the needs of our customers, which could adversely impact our financial condition, our results of operations, cash flows, and our level of regulatory-qualifying capital. For further discussion, see the Liquidity section of Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
(d) Operational Risk
We have significant competition in both attracting and retaining deposits and in originating loans.
Competition is intense in most of the markets we serve. We compete on price and service with other banks and financial companies such as savings and loans, credit unions, finance companies, mortgage banking companies, and brokerage firms. Competition could intensify in the future as a result of industry consolidation, the increasing availability of products and services from non-banks, greater technological developments in the industry, and banking reform.
Management maintains internal operational controls and we have invested in technology to help us process large volumes of transactions. However, there can be no assurance that we will be able to continue processing at the same or higher levels of transactions. If our systems of internal controls should fail to work as expected, if our systems were to be used in an unauthorized manner, or if employees were to subvert the system of internal controls, significant losses could occur.
13
We process large volumes of transactions on a daily basis and are exposed to numerous types of operation risk. Operational risk resulting from inadequate or failed internal processes, people, and systems includes the risk of fraud by employees or persons outside of our company, the execution of unauthorized transactions by employees, errors relating to transaction processing and systems, and breaches of the internal control system and compliance requirements. This risk of loss also includes potential legal actions that could arise as a result of the operational deficiency or as a result of noncompliance with applicable regulatory standards.
We establish and maintain systems of internal operational controls that provide management with timely and accurate information about our level of operational risk. While not foolproof, these systems have been designed to manage operational risk at appropriate, cost effective levels. We have also established procedures that are designed to ensure that policies relating to conduct, ethics, and business practices are followed. From time to time, we experience loss from operational risk, including the effects of operational errors.
While management continually monitors and improves our system of internal controls, data processing systems, and corporate wide processes and procedures, there can be no assurance that we will not suffer such losses in the future. New, or changes in existing tax, accounting, are regulatory laws, regulations, rules, standards, policies, and interpretations could significantly impact strategic initiatives, results of operations, cash flows, and financial condition.
The financial services industry is extensively regulated. Federal and state banking regulations are designed primarily to protect deposit insurance funds and consumers, not to benefit a financial companys shareholders. These regulations may sometimes impose significant limitations on operations. The significant federal and state banking regulations that affect us are described in this report under the heading Regulation. These regulations, along with currently existing tax, accounting, and monetary laws, regulations, rules, standards, policies and interpretations control the methods by which financial institutions conduct business, implement strategic initiatives and tax compliance, and govern financial reporting and disclosures. These laws, regulations, rules, standards, policies, and interpretations are constantly evolving and may change significantly over time. Events that may not have a direct impact on us, such as the bankruptcy of U.S. companies, have resulted in legislators, regulators, and authoritative bodies, such as the Financial Accounting Standards Board, the Securities and Exchange Commission, the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, and other various taxing authorities responding by adopting and or proposing substantive revisions to laws, regulations, rules, standards, policies, and interpretations. The nature, extent, and timing of the adoption of significant new laws and regulations, or changes in or repeal of existing laws and regulations may have a material impact on our business and results of operations. However, it is impossible to predict at this time, the extent to which any such adoption, change, or repeal would impact us.
OVERVIEW
During the quarter, we completed the redesign of our Mt. Washington facility in Bullitt County. This follows the redesign of one of our Hardin County facilities and the opening of two new full-service facilities in the growing Louisville market. We intend to start construction on a new full-service banking center in Elizabethtown during 2005 with plans of opening in early 2006. The design of the new and enhanced facilities represents our state of the art prototype branch with a retail focused design, complimenting our commitment to providing superior customer service. We believe these facilities will allow us to more effectively support our lending relationships and to develop a larger presence within these markets in the future. While we anticipate these facilities will significantly enhance the value of our franchise in the near future, the additional expense in operating these new facilities will continue to place pressure on earnings for a period of time. We are optimistic that our expansion strategy will minimize this period and the long-term benefits will outweigh the initial investment.
While the commercial loan growth in the first quarter of 2005 was slower than recent quarters, our emphasis on commercial lending continued to produce positive results generating a $2.3 million increase in commercial loans to $348 million at March 31, 2005, compared to $346 million at December 31, 2004. This favorable trend has resulted in a 34% annual compound growth rate over the past four years. The percentage of commercial loans in our portfolio has increased from 57% at December 31, 2004, to 58% at March 31, 2005. We intend to continue this commercial lending emphasis and anticipate continued increases in the commercial and commercial real estate portfolios.
In January 2003, we implemented a strategy to develop a bank-wide service and sales culture emphasizing expanded account relationships. To achieve this goal, we increased the number of associates in banking centers, relationship bankers, business development officers, stockbrokers, and loan officers with experience in commercial lending. The results of this effort as well as our transition from a federally chartered thrift to a state-chartered commercial bank in January 2003, have contributed to our growth. The resulting increase in staff
14
along with the expansion into the Louisville market have contributed to a $380,000, or 16% increase in employee compensation expense for the quarter ended March 31, 2005, compared to the quarter ended March 31, 2004. We expect a continued increase in employee compensation expense in the 2005 calendar year as we continue our expansion into our current markets.
Our accounting and reporting policies comply with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and conform to general practices within the banking industry. The accounting policy relating to the allowance for loan losses is critical to the understanding of our results of operations since the application of this policy requires significant management assumptions and estimates that could result in materially different amounts to be reported if conditions or underlying circumstances were to change.
Allowance for Loan Losses We maintain an allowance sufficient to absorb probable incurred credit losses existing in the loan portfolio, and our Executive Loan Committee evaluates the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses on a quarterly basis. We estimate the allowance required using past loan loss experience, known and inherent risks in the portfolio, adverse situations that may affect the borrowers ability to repay, estimated value of the underlying collateral, and current economic conditions. While we estimate the allowance for loan losses, in part, based on historical losses within each loan category, estimates for losses within the commercial real estate portfolio depend more on credit analysis and recent payment performance. Allocations of the allowance may be made for specific loans or loan categories, but the entire allowance is available for any loan that, in managements judgment, should be charged off.
The allowance consists of specific and general components. The specific component relates to loans that are individually classified as impaired or loans otherwise classified as substandard or doubtful. The general component covers non-classified loans and is based on historical loss experience adjusted for current factors. The methodology for allocating the allowance for loan and lease losses takes into account our strategic plan to increase our emphasis on commercial and consumer lending. We increase the amount of the allowance allocated to commercial loans and consumer loans in response to the growth of the commercial and consumer loan portfolios and managements recognition of the higher risks and loan losses in these lending areas. Allowance estimates are developed in consultation with regulatory authorities and actual loss experience adjusted for current economic conditions. Allowance estimates are considered a prudent measurement of the risk in the loan portfolio and are applied to individual loans based on loan type.
Based on our calculation, an allowance of $6.7 million or 1.12% of total loans was reserved for potential losses within the loan portfolio as of March 31, 2005. This estimate resulted in a provision for loan losses on the income statement of $275,000 during the quarter. If the mix and amount of future charge off percentages differ significantly from those assumptions used by management in making its determination, the allowance for loan losses and provision for loan losses on the income statement could be materially and adversely affected.
Net income for the quarter ended March 31, 2005 was $2.2 million or $0.60 per share diluted compared to $1.8 million or $0.50 per share diluted for the same period in 2004. The increase in diluted earnings per share was the result of an increase in net-interest income of $863,000, a decrease in provision for loan loss expense and a $250,000 increase in non-interest income. Our book value per common share increased from $15.35 at March 31, 2004 to $16.70 at March 31, 2005. Annualized net income for 2005 generated a return on average assets of 1.18% and a return on average equity of 14.35%. These compare with a return on average assets of 1.07% and a return on average equity of 12.99% for the 2004 period also annualized.
Net Interest Income-On an annualized basis, the net interest margin as a percent of average earning assets increased 26 basis points to 3.90% for the quarter ended March 31, 2005 compared to 3.64% for the 2004 period. We were able to increase our net interest margin through an increase in the yield on earning assets, which increased 23 basis points from 6.02% for the 2004 quarter to 6.25% for the 2005 period. We have been successful in increasing the percentage of variable rate loans in the loan portfolio, which we expect to increase the yield in an increasing interest rate environment. The prime lending rate increased 175 basis points since the Federal Open Market Committee began increasing short-term interest rates in June 2004. Management expects its yield on loans to improve with additional increases in the prime-lending rate.
Our cost of funds averaged 2.53% during the 2005 quarter, a decrease of 2 basis points from the 2004 average cost of funds of 2.55%. Going forward, our cost of funds is expected to increase as the general market deposit rates have become increasingly competitive with the recent upward trend in interest rates.
15
The net result of the above factors was an increase in net interest income of $863,000 for the quarter ended March 31, 2005 compared to the same three-month period a year ago.
AVERAGE BALANCE SHEET
The following table sets forth information relating to the Banks average balance sheet and reflects the average yield on assets and average cost of liabilities for the periods indicated. Dividing income or expense by the average monthly balance of assets or liabilities, respectively, derives such yields and costs for the periods presented.
|
|
Quarter Ended March 31, |
|
|||||||||||||||
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
|||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Average Balance |
|
Interest |
|
Average Yield/Cost (5) |
|
Average Balance |
|
Interest |
|
Average Yield/Cost (5) |
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Interest earning assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
U.S. Treasury and agencies |
|
$ |
49,623 |
|
$ |
324 |
|
2.65 |
% |
$ |
17,168 |
|
$ |
149 |
|
3.49 |
% |
|
Mortgage-backed securities |
|
8,445 |
|
80 |
|
3.84 |
|
8,751 |
|
84 |
|
3.86 |
|
|||||
Equity securities |
|
2,673 |
|
40 |
|
6.07 |
|
2,950 |
|
33 |
|
4.50 |
|
|||||
State and political subdivision securities (1) |
|
991 |
|
15 |
|
6.14 |
|
1,071 |
|
18 |
|
6.76 |
|
|||||
Corporate bonds |
|
2,065 |
|
23 |
|
4.52 |
|
2,000 |
|
15 |
|
3.02 |
|
|||||
Loans receivable (2) (3) (4) |
|
599,006 |
|
9,954 |
|
6.74 |
|
562,049 |
|
9,108 |
|
6.52 |
|
|||||
FHLB stock |
|
6,846 |
|
76 |
|
4.50 |
|
6,571 |
|
65 |
|
3.98 |
|
|||||
Interest bearing deposits |
|
20,409 |
|
123 |
|
2.44 |
|
38,145 |
|
85 |
|
0.90 |
|
|||||
Total interest earning assets |
|
690,058 |
|
10,635 |
|
6.25 |
|
638,705 |
|
9,557 |
|
6.02 |
|
|||||
Less: Allowance for loan losses |
|
(6,502 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(5,581 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|||||
Non-interest earning assets |
|
59,880 |
|
|
|
|
|
54,059 |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total assets |
|
$ |
743,436 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
687,183 |
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Interest bearing liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Savings accounts |
|
$ |
78,122 |
|
$ |
222 |
|
1.15 |
% |
$ |
91,137 |
|
$ |
188 |
|
0.83 |
% |
|
NOW and money market |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
accounts |
|
155,938 |
|
512 |
|
1.33 |
|
121,619 |
|
221 |
|
0.73 |
|
|||||
Certificates of deposit and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
other time deposits |
|
316,494 |
|
2,158 |
|
2.77 |
|
294,471 |
|
2,316 |
|
3.16 |
|
|||||
FHLB advances |
|
78,877 |
|
944 |
|
4.85 |
|
78,243 |
|
928 |
|
4.77 |
|
|||||
Trust preferred securities |
|
10,000 |
|
158 |
|
6.41 |
|
10,000 |
|
124 |
|
4.99 |
|
|||||
Total interest bearing liabilities |
|
639,431 |
|
3,994 |
|
2.53 |
|
595,470 |
|
3,777 |
|
2.55 |
|
|||||
Non-interest bearing liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Non-interest bearing deposits |
|
39,442 |
|
|
|
|
|
31,918 |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Other liabilities |
|
3,617 |
|
|
|
|
|
3,200 |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total liabilities |
|
682,490 |
|
|
|
|
|
630,588 |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Stockholders equity |
|
60,946 |
|
|
|
|
|
56,595 |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
743,436 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
687,183 |
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net interest income |
|
|
|
$ |
6,641 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
5,780 |
|
|
|
|||
Net interest spread |
|
|
|
|
|
3.72 |
% |
|
|
|
|
3.47 |
% |
|||||
Net interest margin |
|
|
|
|
|
3.90 |
% |
|
|
|
|
3.64 |
% |
|||||
(1) Taxable equivalent yields are calculated assuming a 34% federal income tax rate.
(2) Includes loan fees, immaterial in amount, in both interest income and the calculation of yield on loans.
(3) Calculations include non-accruing loans in the average loan amounts outstanding.
(4) Includes loans held for sale.
(5) Annualized
16
RATE/VOLUME ANALYSIS
The table below sets forth certain information regarding changes in interest income and interest expense of the Bank for the periods indicated. For each category of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, information is provided on changes attributable to (1) changes in rate (changes in rate multiplied by old volume); (2) changes in volume (change in volume multiplied by old rate); and (3) changes in rate-volume (change in rate multiplied by change in volume). Changes in rate-volume are proportionately allocated between rate and volume variance.
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, 2005 vs. 2004 |
|
|||||||
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Increase (decrease) Due to change in |
|
|||||||
|
|
Rate |
|
Volume |
|
Net Change |
|
|||
Interest income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
U.S. Treasury and agencies |
|
$ |
(44 |
) |
$ |
219 |
|
$ |
175 |
|
Mortgage-backed securities |
|
(1 |
) |
(3 |
) |
(4 |
) |
|||
Equity securities |
|
10 |
|
(3 |
) |
7 |
|
|||
State and political subdivision |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
securities |
|
(2 |
) |
(1 |
) |
(3 |
) |
|||
Corporate bonds |
|
8 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|||
Loans |
|
239 |
|
607 |
|
846 |
|
|||
FHLB stock |
|
8 |
|
3 |
|
11 |
|
|||
Interest bearing deposits |
|
92 |
|
(54 |
) |
38 |
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Total interest earning assets |
|
310 |
|
768 |
|
1,078 |
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Interest expense: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Savings accounts |
|
63 |
|
(29 |
) |
34 |
|
|||
NOW and money market accounts |
|
216 |
|
75 |
|
291 |
|
|||
Certificates of deposit and other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
time deposits |
|
(322 |
) |
164 |
|
(158 |
) |
|||
FHLB advances |
|
9 |
|
7 |
|
16 |
|
|||
Trust Preferred Securities |
|
34 |
|
|
|
34 |
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Total interest bearing liabilities |
|
|
|
217 |
|
217 |
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Net change in net interest income |
|
$ |
310 |
|
$ |
551 |
|
$ |
861 |
|
Non-Interest Income-Non-interest income increased $250,000, or 14% for the quarter ended March 31, 2005 to $2.0 million compared to $1.8 million for the same quarter in 2004. The increased level of non-interest income during 2005 was primarily related to a $381,000 gain on the sale of investment securities. Offsetting this increase were decreases in customer service fees on deposit accounts, gain on sale of mortgage loans, brokerage and insurance commissions and other income.
Customer service fees on deposit accounts decreased $15,000 for the first quarter of 2005 due to a decline in the number of non-sufficient fund charges. Gain on sale of mortgage loans decreased $34,000 for the 2004 quarter, resulting from lower origination volume. Other non-interest income decreased during the 2005 period by $66,000 primarily due to losses on repossessed assets.
Non-Interest Expense - Non-interest expense increased $705,000 or 16% during the quarter ended March 31, 2005 compared to the same period in 2004. The primary factors impacting non-interest expense include additional operating and employee compensation expenses relating to the recent retail expansion efforts. Employee compensation and benefits, the largest component of non-interest expense, increased 380,000 or 16% for 2005. Twenty-one retail staff positions were added for the expansion into the Louisville market, coupled with expanded facilities in Hardin County and Bullitt County, Kentucky. Additional increases in staff have
17
taken place during 2004 and 2005 as we strengthen our retail sales culture and provide expanded products and services to our retail and commercial customers.
The two full service branch openings have contributed to higher operating costs including an increase in office occupancy and equipment expense of $86,000, an increase in promotions and enhanced radio and newspaper marketing of $49,000, and an increase in data processing and outside service fees of $83,000.
We anticipate the increased level on non-interest expense to continue during 2005 with continued retail expansion and market share protection efforts. We intend to start construction on a new full service-banking center in Elizabethtown, KY during 2005 with plans of opening in early 2006. We are also considering other possible locations within the core market area to protect and grow our 21% market share.
Despite the increase in non-interest expense for 2005, we maintained an efficiency ratio of 59% for the quarters ended March 31, 2005 and 2004.
ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
Total assets at March 31, 2005 were $742.5 million compared to $737.6 million at December 31, 2004, an increase of $4.9 million. The increase was primarily related to an increase in investment securities of $15.8 million and an increase in deposits of $2.7 million. These increases were offset by a decrease in net loans receivable of $5.6 million and a decrease in cash and cash equivalents of $7.0 million.
Net loans receivable decreased $5.5 million to $593.9 million at March 31, 2005 compared to $599.4 million at December 31, 2004. Our commercial and commercial real estate portfolios increased $2.3 million to $348 million at March 31, 2005. For the 2005 period, these loans comprised 58% of the total loan portfolio compared to 57% at December 31, 2004, and 51% at March 31, 2004. While the loan growth in the first quarter of 2005 was slower than recent quarters, we expect the favorable trend, which has generated a 4% compound annual growth rate in the total loan portfolio to continue for 2005.
Offsetting this growth was a $5.6 million, or 3.5% decrease in the residential mortgage loan portfolio to $153.9 million at March 31, 2005, compared to $159.5 million at December 31, 2004. For 2005, the decline in mortgage loans is expected to slow from the decreases experienced in 2003 and early 2004. Also, contributing to the decrease was a $1.7 million decline in consumer loans.
Allowance and Provision for Loan Losses
Our financial performance depends on the quality of the loans we originate and managements ability to assess the degree of risk in existing loans when it determines the allowance for loan losses. An increase in loan charge-offs or non-performing loans or an inadequate allowance for loan losses could reduce net interest income, net income and capital and limit the range of products and services we can offer.
The Executive Loan Committee evaluates the allowance for loan losses quarterly to maintain a level sufficient to absorb probable incurred credit losses existing in the loan portfolio. Periodic provisions to the allowance are made as needed. The allowance is determined based on the application of loss estimates to graded loans by categories. The amount of the provision for loan losses necessary to maintain an adequate allowance is also based upon an analysis of such factors as changes in lending policies and procedures; underwriting standards; collection; charge-off and recovery history; changes in national and local economic business conditions and developments; changes in the characteristics of the portfolio; ability and depth of lending management and staff; changes in the trend of the volume and severity of past due, non-accrual and classified loans; troubled debt restructuring and other loan modifications; and results of regulatory examinations.
The methodology for allocating the allowance for loan and lease losses takes into account our strategic plan to increase our emphasis on commercial and consumer lending. We increase the amount of the allowance allocated to commercial loans and consumer loans in response to the growth of the commercial and consumer loan portfolios and managements recognition of the higher risks and loan losses in these lending areas. The indirect consumer loan program is comprised of new and used automobile, motorcycle and all terrain vehicle loans originated on our behalf by a select group of auto dealers within our service area. The indirect loan program involves a greater degree of risk and is evaluated quarterly and monitored by the Board of Directors. In light of the greater charge-offs from indirect consumer loans compared to direct consumer loans, proportionally more of the allowance for consumer loans is allocated for indirect loans than direct loans. As the indirect loan program has evolved, dealer analysis and
18
underwriting standards have been refined to improve the loan loss experience of the program. Estimating the allowance is a continuous process. In this regard, the Executive Loan Committee continues to monitor the performance of indirect consumer loans as well as our other loan products and updates estimates as the evidence warrants.
The following table sets forth an analysis of the Banks loan loss experience for the periods indicated.
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
||||
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Balance at beginning of period |
|
$ |
6,489 |
|
$ |
5,568 |
|
Loans charged-off: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Real estate mortgage |
|
4 |
|
41 |
|
||
Consumer |
|
136 |
|
230 |
|
||
Commercial |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Total charge-offs |
|
140 |
|
271 |
|
||
Recoveries: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Real estate mortgage |
|
1 |
|
|
|
||
Consumer |
|
76 |
|
47 |
|
||
Commercial |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Total recoveries |
|
77 |
|
47 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Net loans charged-off |
|
63 |
|
224 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Provision for loan losses |
|
275 |
|
389 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Balance at end of period |
|
$ |
6,701 |
|
$ |
5,733 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Allowance for loan losses to total loans (excluding loans held for sale) |
|
1.12 |
% |
1.01 |
% |
||
Net charge-offs to average loans outstanding |
|
0.01 |
% |
0.04 |
% |
||
Allowance for loan losses to |
|
|
|
|
|
||
total non-performing loans |
|
124 |
% |
131 |
% |
The provision for loan losses decreased $114,000, or 29% to $275,000 for the quarter ended March 31, 2005, compared to the 2004 period due to slower loan growth during the 2005 quarter. The total allowance for loan losses increased $968,000 to $6.7 million from March 31, 2004 to March 31, 2005. The increase in the allowance was related to a $30.0 million increase in loans receivable at March 31, 2005, compared to March 31, 2004, in conjunction with a $2.6 million increase in classified loans for the 2005 period compared to the 2004 period. Net loan charge-offs decreased $161,000 to $63,000 during 2005 compared to $224,000 during 2004. The decrease in charge-offs is primarily related to a decrease in charge-offs of indirect consumer loans during the period.
Federal regulations require insured institutions to classify their own assets on a regular basis. The regulations provide for three categories of classified loans substandard, doubtful and loss. Assets classified as substandard or doubtful require the institution to establish general allowances for loan losses. If an asset or portion thereof is classified as loss, the insured institution must either establish specified allowances for loan losses in the amount of 100% of the portion of the asset classified loss, or charge off such amount. At March 31, 2005, on the basis of managements review of the loan portfolio, we had $8.0 million of assets classified substandard, $970,000 classified as doubtful, and $89,000 of assets classified as loss. At March 31, 2004, on the basis of managements review of the loan portfolio, we had $5.2 million assets classified substandard, $1.2 million classified as doubtful, and $106,000 of assets classified as loss.
Loans are classified according to estimated loss as follows: Substandard-2.5% to 35%; Doubtful-5% to 50%; and Loss-100%;. We additionally provide a reserve estimate for probable incurred losses in non-classified loans ranging from .20% to 3.50%. Although we may allocate a portion of the allowance to specific loans or loan categories, the entire allowance is available for active charge-offs. Allowance estimates are developed in consultation with regulatory authorities and actual loss experience adjusted for current economic conditions. Allowance estimates are considered a prudent measurement of the risk in the loan portfolio and are applied to individual loans based on loan type.
19
Non-performing assets consist of certain restructured loans for which interest rate or other terms have been renegotiated, loans on which interest is no longer accrued, real estate acquired through foreclosure and repossessed assets. We do not have any loans greater than 90 days past due still on accrual. Loans, including impaired loans under SFAS 114, are placed on non-accrual status when they become past due 90 days or more as to principal or interest, unless they are adequately secured and in the process of collection. Loans are considered impaired if full principal or interest payments are not anticipated in accordance with the contractual loan terms. Impaired loans are carried at the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loans effective interest rate or at the fair value of the collateral if the loan is collateral dependent.
Loans are reviewed on a regular basis and normal collection procedures are implemented when a borrower fails to make a required payment on a loan. If the delinquency on a mortgage loan exceeds 90 days and is not cured through normal collection procedures or an acceptable arrangement is not worked out with the borrower, we institute measures to remedy the default, including commencing a foreclosure action. Consumer loans generally are charged off when a loan is deemed uncollectible by management and any available collateral has been disposed of. Commercial business and real estate loan delinquencies are handled on an individual basis by management with the advice of legal counsel.
Interest income on loans is recognized on the accrual basis except for those loans in a non-accrual of income status. The accrual of interest on impaired loans is discontinued when management believes, after consideration of economic and business conditions and collection efforts that the borrowers financial condition is such that collection of interest is doubtful, typically after the loan becomes 90 days delinquent. When interest accrual is discontinued, existing accrued interest is reversed and interest income is subsequently recognized only to the extent cash payments are received.
Real estate acquired as a result of foreclosure or by deed in lieu of foreclosure is classified as real estate owned until such time as it is sold. New and used automobile, motorcycle and all terrain vehicles acquired as a result of foreclosure are classified as repossessed assets until they are sold. When such property is acquired it is recorded at the lower of the unpaid principal balance of the related loan or its fair market value. Any write-down of the property at the time of acquisition is charged to the allowance for loan losses. Subsequent gains and losses are included in non-interest income and non-interest expense.
The following table sets forth information with respect to non-performing assets for the periods indicated.
(Dollar in thousands) |
|
March 31, 2005 |
|
December 31, 2004 |
|
||
Restructured |
|
$ |
3,185 |
|
$ |
3,218 |
|
Past due 90 days still on accrual |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Loans on non-accrual status |
|
2,233 |
|
2,022 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Total non-performing loans |
|
5,418 |
|
5,240 |
|
||
Real estate acquired through foreclosure |
|
913 |
|
681 |
|
||
Other repossessed assets |
|
59 |
|
40 |
|
||
Total non-performing assets |
|
$ |
6,390 |
|
$ |
5,961 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Interest income that would have been earned on non-performing loans |
|
$ |
365 |
|
$ |
336 |
|
Interest income recognized on non-performing loans |
|
209 |
|
197 |
|
||
Ratios: Non-performing loans to total loans (excluding loans held for sale) |
|
0.90 |
% |
0.87 |
% |
||
Non-performing assets to total loans (excluding loans held for sale) |
|
1.07 |
% |
0.99 |
% |
Included in non-performing assets for the 2005 period is $3.2 million in restructured commercial and residential mortgage loans. The restructured loans primarily consist of three credit relationships aggregating $3.0 million, including a $2.3 million commercial relationship, a $215,000 commercial relationship and a $459,000 residential mortgage relationship. The terms of these loans have been renegotiated to reduce the rate of interest and extend the term thus reducing the amount of cash flow required from the borrower to service the loans. The terms of the restructured loans are currently being met.
20
Investment Securities
Interest on securities provides us our largest source of interest income after interest on loans, constituting 6.3% of the total interest income for the quarter ended March 31, 2005. The securities portfolio serves as a source of liquidity and earnings and contributes to the management of interest rate risk. We have the authority to invest in various types of liquid assets, including short-term United States Treasury obligations and securities of various federal agencies, obligations of states and political subdivisions, corporate bonds, certificates of deposit at insured savings and loans and banks, bankers acceptances, and federal funds. We may also invest a portion of our assets in certain commercial paper and corporate debt securities. We are also authorized to invest in mutual funds and stocks whose assets conform to the investments that we are authorized to make directly. The available-for-sale and held-to-maturity investment portfolios increased by $15.8 million or 28% during the 2005 period due to investments in U.S. agencies and a corporate bond. We also sold $1.4 million in securities available-for-sale during the 2005quarter due to of one of our equity investments de-listing from the NASDAQ National Market System.
We rely primarily on customer service and long-standing relationships with customers to attract and retain deposits. Market interest rates and rates on deposit products offered by competing financial institutions can significantly affect our ability to attract and retain deposits. During the quarter ended March 31, 2005, total deposits increased by $2.7 million compared to December 31, 2004. The increase in retail deposits was primarily in certificate of deposit balances. We plan to continue our deposit gathering initiatives by utilizing pricing strategies and offering competitive products in our existing markets.
The following table breaks down our deposits.
|
|
March 31, 2005 |
|
December 31, 2004 |
|
||
|
|
(In Thousands) |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Non-interest bearing |
|
$ |
39,961 |
|
$ |
38,441 |
|
NOW demand |
|
73,299 |
|
73,801 |
|
||
Savings |
|
69,657 |
|
78,499 |
|
||
Money market |
|
84,340 |
|
85,418 |
|
||
Certificates of deposit |
|
321,792 |
|
310,227 |
|
||
|
|
$ |
589,049 |
|
$ |
586,386 |
|
Liquidity risk arises from the possibility we may not be able to satisfy current or future financial commitments, or may become unduly reliant on alternative funding sources. The objective of liquidity risk management is to ensure that the cash flow requirements of depositors and borrowers, as well as our operating cash needs, are met, taking into account all on- and off-balance sheet funding demands. Liquidity risk management also includes ensuring cash flow needs are met at a reasonable cost. We maintain an investment and funds management policy, which identifies the primary sources of liquidity, establishes procedures for monitoring and measuring liquidity, and establishes minimum liquidity requirements in compliance with regulatory guidance. The liquidity position is continually monitored and reviewed by the Asset Liability Committee.
Funds are available from a number of sources, including the sale of securities in the available-for-sale portion of the investment portfolio, principal paydowns on loans and mortgage-backed securities, proceeds realized from loans held for sale, brokered deposits and other wholesale funding. At March 31, 2005, we had brokered deposits totaling $500,000. We also have secured federal funds borrowing lines from two of our correspondent banks totaling $10 million and $15 million respectively. Our banking centers also provide access to retail deposit markets. If large certificate depositors shift to our competitors or the stock market in response to interest rate changes, we have the ability to replenish those deposits through alternative funding sources. Traditionally, we have also utilized borrowings from the FHLB to supplement our funding requirements. At March 31, 2005, we had an unused approved line of credit in the amount of $97.1 million and sufficient collateral available to borrow, approximately, an additional $28 million in advances from the FHLB. We believe our sources of liquidity are adequate to meet expected cash needs for the foreseeable future.
21
At the holding company level, the Corporation uses cash to pay dividends to stockholders, repurchase common stock, make selected investments and acquisitions, and service debt. The main sources of funding for the holding company include dividends and returns of investment from the Bank, a revolving credit agreement with an unaffiliated bank, and access to the capital markets.
Stockholders equity increased $1.1 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2005 compared to December 31, 2004. The increase in capital was primarily attributable to net income during the quarter and stock options exercised by our employees. These increases were offset by a decline in accumulated other comprehensive income, a result of temporary unrealized losses recorded on securities. Average stockholders equity to average assets ratio declined to 8.20% for the quarter ended March 31, 2005 compared to 8.23% for 2004.
In March 2002, a trust formed by First Financial Service Corporation completed the private placement of 10,000 shares of cumulative trust preferred securities with a liquidation preference of $1,000 per security. The proceeds of the offering were loaned to us in exchange for floating rate junior subordinated deferrable interest debentures. Distributions on the securities are payable quarterly at a rate per annum equal to the 3-month LIBOR plus 3.60%. We undertook the issuance of these securities to enhance our regulatory capital position, as the securities are considered as Tier I capital under current regulatory guidelines.
Each of the federal bank regulatory agencies has established minimum leverage capital requirements for banking organizations. Banking organizations must maintain a minimum ratio of Tier 1 capital to adjusted average quarterly assets equal to 3% to 5% subject to federal bank regulatory evaluation of an organizations overall safety and soundness. We intend to maintain a capital position that meets or exceeds the well capitalized requirements as defined by the FDIC. The following table shows the ratios of Tier 1 capital and total capital to risk-adjusted assets and the leverage ratios for the Corporation and the Bank as of March 31, 2005.
22
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Actual |
|
For Capital Adequacy Purposes |
|
To Be Considered Well Capitalized Under Prompt Correction Action Provisions |
|
|||||||||
As of March 31, 2005: |
|
Amount |
|
Ratio |
|
Amount |
|
Ratio |
|
Amount |
|
Ratio |
|
|||
Total risk-based capital (to risk- weighted assets) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Consolidated |
|
$ |
69,205 |
|
11.7 |
% |
$ |
47,263 |
|
8.0 |
% |
$ |
59,078 |
|
10.0 |
% |
Bank |
|
67,296 |
|
11.4 |
|
47,138 |
|
8.0 |
|
58,922 |
|
10.0 |
|
|||
Tier I capital (to risk-weighted assets) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Consolidated |
|
62,210 |
|
10.5 |
|
23,631 |
|
4.0 |
|
35,447 |
|
6.0 |
|
|||
Bank |
|
60,346 |
|
10.2 |
|
23,569 |
|
4.0 |
|
35,353 |
|
6.0 |
|
|||
Tier I capital (to average assets) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Consolidated |
|
62,210 |
|
8.4 |
|
29,526 |
|
4.0 |
|
36,907 |
|
5.0 |
|
|||
Bank |
|
60,346 |
|
8.2 |
|
29,306 |
|
4.0 |
|
36,632 |
|
5.0 |
|
|||
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Actual |
|
For Capital Adequacy Purposes |
|
To Be Considered Well Capitalized Under Prompt Correction Action Provision |
|
|||||||||
As of December 31, 2004: |
|
Amount |
|
Ratio |
|
Amount |
|
Ratio |
|
Amount |
|
Ratio |
|
|||
Total risk-based capital (to risk- weighted assets) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Consolidated |
|
$ |
67,798 |
|
11.6 |
% |
$ |
46,793 |
|
8.0 |
% |
$ |
58,492 |
|
10.0 |
% |
Bank |
|
65,087 |
|
11.2 |
|
46,600 |
|
8.0 |
|
58,250 |
|
10.0 |
|
|||
Tier I capital (to risk-weighted assets) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Consolidated |
|
61,029 |
|
10.4 |
|
23,397 |
|
4.0 |
|
35,095 |
|
6.0 |
|
|||
Bank |
|
58,318 |
|
10.0 |
|
23,300 |
|
4.0 |
|
34,950 |
|
6.0 |
|
|||
Tier I capital (to average assets) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Consolidated |
|
61,029 |
|
8.5 |
|
28,860 |
|
4.0 |
|
36,075 |
|
5.0 |
|
|||
Bank |
|
58,318 |
|
8.1 |
|
28,762 |
|
4.0 |
|
35,953 |
|
5.0 |
|
|||
Statements contained in this report that are not statements of historical fact constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. In addition, the Corporation may make forward-looking statements in future filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, in press releases, and in oral and written statements made by or with the approval of the Corporation. Forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to: (1) projections of revenues, income or loss, earnings or loss per share, capital structure and other financial items; (2) statements of plans and objectives of the Corporation or its management or Board of Directors; (3) statements regarding future events, actions or economic performance; and (4) statements of assumptions underlying such statements. Words such as estimate, strategy, believes, anticipates, expects, intends, plans, targeted, and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements, but are not the exclusive means of identifying such statements.
Forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties that may cause actual results to differ materially from those indicated by the forward-looking statements. Some of the events or circumstances that could cause such differences include the following: changes in general economic conditions and economic conditions in Kentucky and the markets served by the Corporation any of which may affect, among other things, the level of non-performing assets, charge-offs, and provision expense; changes in the interest rate environment which may reduce interest margins and impact funding sources; changes in market rates and prices which may adversely impact the value of financial products including securities, loans and deposit; changes in tax laws, rules and regulations; various monetary and fiscal policies and regulations, including those determined by the Federal Reserve Board, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation and the Kentucky Office of Financial Institutions; competition with other local and regional commercial banks, savings banks, credit unions and other non-bank financial institutions; ability to grow core businesses; ability to develop and introduce new banking-related
23
products, services and enhancements and gain market acceptance of such products; and managements ability to manage these and other risks.
To minimize the volatility of net interest income and exposure to economic loss that may result from fluctuating interest rates, we manage our exposure to adverse changes in interest rates through asset and liability management activities within guidelines established by our Asset Liability Committee (ALCO). The ALCO, which includes senior management representatives, has the responsibility for approving and ensuring compliance with asset/liability management polices. Interest rate risk is the exposure to adverse changes in the net interest income as a result of market fluctuations in interest rates. The ALCO, on an ongoing basis, monitors interest rate and liquidity risk in order to implement appropriate funding and balance sheet strategies. Management considers interest rate risk to be our most significant market risk.
We utilize an earnings simulation model to analyze net interest income sensitivity. Potential changes in market interest rates and their subsequent effects on net interest income are then evaluated. The model projects the effect of instantaneous movements in interest rates of both 100 and 200 basis points. Assumptions based on the historical behavior of our deposit rates and balances in relation to changes in interest rates are also incorporated into the model. These assumptions are inherently uncertain and, as a result, the model cannot precisely measure future net interest income or precisely predict the impact of fluctuations in market interest rates on net interest income. Actual results will differ from the models simulated results due to timing, magnitude and frequency of interest rate changes as well as changes in market conditions and the application and timing of various management strategies.
Our interest sensitivity profile was asset sensitive at both March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004. Given a sustained 100 basis point decrease in rates, our base net interest income would decrease by an estimated 5.29% at March 31, 2005 compared to a decrease of 2.38% at December 31, 2004. Given a 100 basis point increase in interest rates our base net interest income would increase by an estimated 4.76% at March 31, 2005 compared to an increase of 2.19% at December 31, 2004.
Our interest sensitivity at any point in time will be affected by a number of factors. These factors include the mix of interest sensitive assets and liabilities as well as their relative pricing schedules. It is also influenced by market interest rates, deposit growth, loan growth, decay rates and prepayment speed assumptions.
As demonstrated by the March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004 sensitivity tables presented below, we are continuing to transition away from a liability sensitive to an asset sensitive position as compared to prior periods in anticipation of rising interest rates for the next several months. The change in our asset sensitivity is a result of changes in the loan portfolio to a greater extent than changes in the investment portfolio. While lending practices have shifted to shorter term, variable rate commercial and consumer loans, that impact will be evidenced in smaller degrees over time.
Our sensitivity to interest rate changes is presented based on data as of March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004 annualized to a one year period.
24
|
|
March 31, 2005 |
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Decrease in Rates |
|
|
|
Increase in Rates |
|
||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
200 Basis Points |
|
100 Basis Points |
|
Base |
|
100 Basis Points |
|
200 Basis Points |
|
||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
Projected interest income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
Loans |
|
$ |
37,473 |
|
$ |
40,130 |
|
$ |
42,639 |
|
$ |
45,061 |
|
$ |
47,407 |
|
|||||
Investments |
|
1,893 |
|
2,800 |
|
3,336 |
|
3,806 |
|
4,296 |
|
||||||||||
Total interest income |
|
39,366 |
|
42,930 |
|
45,975 |
|
48,867 |
|
51,703 |
|
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
Projected interest expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
Deposits |
|
9,713 |
|
11,095 |
|
12,518 |
|
13,941 |
|
15,364 |
|
||||||||||
Borrowed funds |
|
4,253 |
|
4,339 |
|
4,425 |
|
4,511 |
|
4,597 |
|
||||||||||
Total interest expense |
|
13,966 |
|
15,434 |
|
16,943 |
|
18,452 |
|
19,961 |
|
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
Net interest income |
|
$ |
25,400 |
|
$ |
27,496 |
|
$ |
29,032 |
|
$ |
30,415 |
|
$ |
31,742 |
|
|||||
Change from base |
|
$ |
(3,632 |
) |
$ |
(1,536 |
) |
|
|
$ |
1,383 |
|
$ |
2,710 |
|
||||||
% Change from base |
|
(12.51% |
) |
(5.29% |
) |
|
|
4.76 |
% |
9.33 |
% |
||||||||||
|
|
December 31, 2004 |
|
||||||||||||||||
|
|
Decrease in Rates |
|
|
|
Increase in Rates |
|
||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
200 Basis Points |
|
100 Basis Points |
|
Base |
|
100 Basis Points |
|
200 Basis Points |
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
Projected interest income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
Loans |
|
$ |
38,503 |
|
$ |
39,834 |
|
$ |
40,943 |
|
$ |
41,960 |
|
$ |
42,995 |
|
|||
Investments |
|
1,963 |
|
2,332 |
|
2,517 |
|
2,667 |
|
2,820 |
|
||||||||
Total interest income |
|
40,466 |
|
42,166 |
|
43,460 |
|
44,627 |
|
45,815 |
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
Projected interest expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
Deposits |
|
10,215 |
|
10,805 |
|
11,395 |
|
11,914 |
|
12,433 |
|
||||||||
Borrowed funds |
|
4,262 |
|
4,307 |
|
4,352 |
|
4,393 |
|
4,434 |
|
||||||||
Total interest expense |
|
14,477 |
|
15,112 |
|
15,747 |
|
16,307 |
|
16,867 |
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
Net interest income |
|
$ |
25,989 |
|
$ |
27,054 |
|
$ |
27,713 |
|
$ |
28,320 |
|
$ |
28,948 |
|
|||
Change from base |
|
$ |
(1,724 |
) |
$ |
(659 |
) |
|
|
$ |
607 |
|
$ |
1,235 |
|
||||
% Change from base |
|
(6.22% |
) |
(2.38% |
) |
|
|
2.19 |
% |
4.46 |
% |
||||||||
Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures
Our management evaluated, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. Based on this evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q to ensure that information we are required to disclose in reports that we file or submit under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in Securities and Exchange Commission rules and forms.
Changes in internal control over financial reporting
There was no change in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
25
Although, from time to time, we are involved in various legal proceedings in the normal course of business, there are no material pending legal proceedings to which we are a party, or to which any of our property is subject.
(e) Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
We repurchased no shares of our common stock during the quarter ended March 31, 2005.
Not Applicable
Not Applicable
None
31.1 Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act
31.2 Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act
32 Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 (As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)
26
FIRST FINANCIAL SERVICE CORPORATION
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
DATE: May 9, 2005 |
BY: (S) |
B. Keith Johnson |
|
|
B. Keith Johnson |
|
|
President and Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
DATE: May 9, 2005 |
BY: (S) |
Gregory S. Schreacke |
|
|
Gregory S. Schreacke |
|
|
Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
Principal Accounting Officer |
27
|
Description |
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.1 |
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act |
|
|
|
|
|
31.2 |
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act |
|
|
|
|
|
32 |
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 (As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002) |
|
28