Back to GetFilings.com



 

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

 

FORM 10-Q

 

 

(Mark One)

ý Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2005.

Or

 

o Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 for the transition period from                                                to                                               

 

Commission File Number 000-50266

 

 

TRINITY CAPITAL CORPORATION

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

 

New Mexico

 

85-0242376

(State of incorporation)

 

(I.R.S. Employer Identification Number)

 

 

1200 Trinity Drive, Los Alamos, New Mexico 87544

(Address of principal executive offices)

 

 

(505) 662-5171

Telephone number

 

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.  Yes ý No o

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934).  Yes ý No o

 

APPLICABLE ONLY TO CORPORATE ISSUERS:

 

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date: 6,603,873 shares of common stock, no par value, outstanding as of May 6, 2005.

 



 

TRINITY CAPITAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

 

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

 

 

Item 1.

Financial Statements

 

 

Item 2.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

 

 

Item 3.

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

 

 

Item 4.

Controls and Procedures

 

 

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

 

 

Item 1.

Legal Proceedings

 

 

Item 2.

Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

 

 

Item 3.

Defaults Upon Senior Securities

 

 

Item 4.

Submission of Matters to a Vote of Securities Holders

 

 

Item 5.

Other Information

 

 

Item 6.

Exhibits

 

 

 

SIGNATURES

 

 

 

CERTIFICATIONS

 

1



 

PART I — FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1.  Financial Statements

TRINITY CAPITAL CORPORATION & SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004

 (Amounts in thousands, except share data)

(Unaudited)

 

 

 

March 31,

 

December 31,

 

 

 

2005

 

2004

 

ASSETS

 

 

 

 

 

Cash and due from banks

 

$

38,047

 

$

23,678

 

Interest bearing deposits with banks

 

23,208

 

96

 

Federal funds sold and securities purchased under resell agreements

 

301

 

40

 

Cash and cash equivalents

 

61,556

 

23,814

 

Investment securities available for sale

 

41,786

 

44,105

 

Investment securities held to maturity, at amortized cost (fair value of $52,384 at March 31, 2005 and $61,883 at December 31, 2004)

 

52,377

 

61,658

 

Other investments

 

7,321

 

7,480

 

Loans (net of allowance for loan losses of $8,689 at March 31, 2005 and $8,367 at December 31, 2004)

 

925,038

 

885,954

 

Loans held for sale

 

8,319

 

8,634

 

Premises and equipment, net

 

24,774

 

25,450

 

Accrued interest receivable

 

6,547

 

5,941

 

Mortgage servicing rights, net

 

8,628

 

8,371

 

Other real estate owned

 

3,523

 

6,438

 

Other assets

 

3,019

 

2,548

 

Total assets

 

$

1,142,888

 

$

1,080,393

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

 

 

 

 

 

Liabilities

 

 

 

 

 

Deposits:

 

 

 

 

 

Noninterest bearing

 

$

72,929

 

$

63,070

 

Interest bearing

 

889,160

 

817,511

 

Total deposits

 

962,089

 

880,581

 

Short-term borrowings

 

 

34,400

 

Long-term borrowings

 

78,111

 

60,006

 

Junior subordinated debt owed to unconsolidated trusts

 

22,682

 

22,682

 

Borrowings made by Employee Stock Ownership Plan (ESOP) to outside parties

 

1,214

 

1,686

 

Accrued interest payable

 

2,834

 

2,768

 

Other liabilities

 

4,138

 

5,314

 

Total liabilities

 

1,071,068

 

1,007,437

 

Stock owned by Employee Stock Ownership Plan (ESOP) participants; 636,896 shares and 636,915 shares at March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004, respectively, at fair value; net of unearned ESOP shares of 73,347 shares and 98,318 shares at March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004, respectively, at historical cost

 

16,981

 

18,078

 

Commitments and contingencies (Note 8)

 

 

 

 

 

Stockholders’ equity

 

 

 

 

 

Common stock, no par, authorized 20,000,000 shares; issued 6,856,800 shares, shares outstanding 6,603,873 and 6,732,748 at March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004, respectively

 

6,836

 

6,836

 

Additional paid-in capital

 

1,172

 

997

 

Retained earnings

 

51,746

 

47,849

 

Accumulated other comprehensive loss

 

(311

)

(200

)

Total stockholders’ equity before treasury stock

 

59,443

 

55,482

 

Treasury stock, at cost, 179,580 shares and 25,734 shares at March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004, respectively

 

(4,604

)

(604

)

Total stockholders’ equity

 

54,839

 

54,878

 

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity

 

$

1,142,888

 

$

1,080,393

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited consolidated financial statements.

 

2



 

TRINITY CAPITAL CORPORATION & SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME

For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2005 and 2004

(Amounts in thousands except share and per share data)

(Unaudited)

 

 

 

Three Months Ended

 

 

 

March 31, 2005

 

March 31, 2004

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest income:

 

 

 

 

 

Loans, including fees

 

$

14,222

 

$

11,938

 

Investment securities:

 

 

 

 

 

Taxable

 

656

 

973

 

Nontaxable

 

180

 

158

 

Federal funds sold and repurchase agreements

 

4

 

 

Other interest bearing deposits

 

20

 

6

 

Investment in unconsolidated trusts

 

16

 

13

 

Total interest income

 

15,098

 

13,088

 

Interest expense:

 

 

 

 

 

Deposits

 

3,981

 

2,968

 

Short-term borrowings

 

102

 

67

 

Long-term borrowings

 

577

 

607

 

Junior subordinated debt owed to unconsolidated trusts

 

519

 

439

 

Total interest expense

 

5,179

 

4,081

 

Net interest income

 

9,919

 

9,007

 

Provision for loan losses

 

525

 

600

 

Net interest income after provision for loan losses

 

9,394

 

8,407

 

Other income:

 

 

 

 

 

Mortgage loan servicing fees

 

602

 

574

 

Loan and other fees

 

588

 

557

 

Service charges on deposits

 

331

 

331

 

Gain on sale of loans

 

463

 

1,016

 

Gain on sale of securities

 

 

272

 

Other operating income

 

76

 

267

 

 

 

2,060

 

3,017

 

Other expenses:

 

 

 

 

 

Salaries and employee benefits

 

4,058

 

3,853

 

Occupancy

 

799

 

494

 

Data processing

 

490

 

435

 

Marketing

 

324

 

226

 

Amortization and valuation of mortgage servicing rights

 

130

 

987

 

Supplies

 

209

 

172

 

Other

 

1,648

 

1,362

 

 

 

7,658

 

7,529

 

Income before income taxes

 

3,796

 

3,895

 

Income taxes

 

1,428

 

1,445

 

Net income

 

$

2,368

 

$

2,450

 

Basic earnings per common share

 

$

0.35

 

$

0.36

 

Diluted earnings per common share

 

$

0.35

 

$

0.36

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited consolidated financial statements.

 

3



 

 TRINITY CAPITAL CORPORATION & SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2005 and 2004

(Amounts in thousands)

(Unaudited)

 

 

 

Three Months Ended

 

 

 

March 31,

 

March 31,

 

 

 

2005

 

2004

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash Flows From Operating Activities

 

 

 

 

 

Net income

 

$

2,368

 

$

2,450

 

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:

 

 

 

 

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

631

 

527

 

Net amortization of:

 

 

 

 

 

Mortgage servicing rights

 

694

 

624

 

Premiums and discounts on investment securities

 

293

 

387

 

Junior subordinated debt owed to unconsolidated trusts issuance costs

 

5

 

4

 

Provision for loan losses

 

525

 

600

 

Change in mortgage servicing rights valuation allowance

 

(564

)

364

 

Loss on sale or disposal of premises and equipment

 

143

 

 

Gain on sale of available for sale securities

 

 

(272

)

Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) stock dividends received

 

(41

)

(20

)

Gain on sale of loans

 

(463

)

(1,016

)

Loss on disposal of other real estate owned

 

211

 

159

 

Write-down of value of other real estate owned

 

307

 

 

(Increase) decrease in other assets

 

(1,082

)

1,600

 

Increase (decrease) in other liabilities

 

1,005

 

(2,008

)

Release of Employee Stock Ownership Plan (ESOP) shares

 

606

 

587

 

Net cash provided by operating activities before originations and gross sales of loans

 

4,638

 

3,986

 

Gross sales of loans held for sale

 

38,581

 

61,980

 

Origination of loans held for sale

 

(38,190

)

(68,480

)

Net cash provided by (used in) provided by operating activities

 

5,029

 

(2,514

)

Cash Flows From Investing Activities

 

 

 

 

 

Proceeds from maturities and paydowns of investment securities available for sale

 

2,025

 

19,585

 

Proceeds from maturities and paydowns of investment securities held to maturity

 

9,106

 

26

 

Proceeds from maturities and paydowns of investment securities, other

 

325

 

 

Proceeds from sale of investment securities, available for sale

 

 

28,388

 

Purchase of investment securities available for sale

 

 

(1,620

)

Purchase of investment securities held to maturity

 

 

 

Purchase of investment securities, other

 

(125

)

 

Proceeds from sale of other real estate owned

 

2,872

 

1,505

 

Loans funded, net of repayments

 

(40,084

)

(30,038

)

Purchases of premises and equipment

 

(198

)

(2,528

)

Proceeds from sale of premises and equipment

 

100

 

 

Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities

 

(25,979

)

15,318

 

Cash Flows From Financing Activities

 

 

 

 

 

Net increase in demand deposits, NOW accounts and savings accounts

 

33,558

 

9,673

 

Net increase (decrease) in time deposits

 

47,950

 

(3,153

)

Proceeds from issuances of borrowings

 

20,000

 

83,600

 

Repayment of borrowings

 

(36,295

)

(89,818

)

Repayment of ESOP debt

 

(472

)

(471

)

Purchase of treasury stock

 

(4,000

)

 

Dividend payments

 

(2,049

)

(2,048

)

Net cash provided by (used in) provided by financing activities

 

58,692

 

(2,217

)

Net increase in cash and cash equivalents

 

$

37,742

 

$

10,587

 

Cash and cash equivalents:

 

 

 

 

 

Beginning of year

 

23,814

 

43,111

 

End of period

 

$

61,556

 

$

53,698

 

Supplemental Disclosures of Cash Flow Information

 

 

 

 

 

Cash payments (receipts) for:

 

 

 

 

 

Interest

 

$

5,113

 

$

4,419

 

Income taxes

 

404

 

(230

)

Non-cash investing and financing activities:

 

 

 

 

 

Transfers from loans to other real estate owned

 

475

 

1,124

 

Change in unrealized (loss) gain on investment securities, net of taxes

 

(111

)

12

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited consolidated financial statements.

 

4



 

TRINITY CAPITAL CORPORATION & SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 (Unaudited)

 

Note 1.  Basis of Presentation

 

                The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements include the consolidated balances and results of operations of Trinity Capital Corporation (“Trinity” or the “Company”) and its wholly owned subsidiaries: Los Alamos National Bank (the “Bank”) and Title Guaranty & Insurance Company (“Title Guaranty”), collectively referred to as the “Company.”  Trinity Capital Trust I (“Trust I”), Trinity Capital Trust II (“Trust II”) and Trinity Capital Trust III (“Trust III”), collectively referred to as the “Trusts”, which are also wholly owned subsidiaries of Trinity, are not consolidated in these financial statements (see “Consolidation” accounting policy below.)  The business activities of the Company consist solely of the operations of its wholly owned subsidiaries.  All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.  In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring adjustments) necessary for a fair presentation of the financial position, results of operations and cash flows for the interim periods have been made.  The results of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2005 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the entire fiscal year.

 

                The unaudited interim financial statements have been prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and industry practice.  Certain information in footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and industry practice has been condensed or omitted pursuant to rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission.  These financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in the Company’s December 31, 2004 audited financial statements filed on Form 10-K.

 

                The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principals generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions which affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities as of the date of the financial statements, as well as the reported amounts of income and expenses during the reported periods.  Actual results could differ from those estimates.

 

Note 2.  Comprehensive Income

 

                Comprehensive income includes net income, as well as the change in net unrealized (loss) gain on investment securities available for sale, net of tax.  Comprehensive income was $2.3 million and $2.5 million for the three month periods ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively.

 

Note 3.  Earnings Per Share Data

 

                The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share for the periods indicated:

 

 

 

Three Months Ended March 31,

 

 

 

2005

 

2004

 

 

 

(Unaudited; In thousands except
for share and per share data)

 

Net income

 

$

2,368

 

$

2,450

 

Weighted average common shares issued

 

6,856,800

 

6,856,800

 

LESS: Weighted average treasury stock shares

 

(99,238

)

(29,128

)

LESS: Weighted average unearned Employee Stock Ownership Plan (ESOP) stock shares

 

(78,619

)

(105,270

)

Weighted average common shares outstanding, net

 

6,678,943

 

6,722,402

 

Basic earnings per common share

 

$

0.35

 

$

0.36

 

Weighted average dilutive shares from stock option plan

 

98,879

 

117,782

 

Weighted average common shares outstanding including dilutive shares

 

6,777,822

 

6,840,184

 

Diluted earnings per common share

 

$

0.35

 

$

0.36

 

 

5



 

Note 4.  Recent Accounting Pronouncements and Regulatory Developments

 

                In September 2004, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position (FSP) Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) Issue No. 03-1-1 delaying the effective date of paragraphs 10-20 of EITF 03-1, The Meaning of Other-Than-Temporary Impairment and Its Application to Certain Investments, which provides guidance for determining the meaning of “other-than-temporarily impaired” and its application to certain debt and equity securities within the scope of SFAS No. 115, Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities, and investments accounted for under the cost method.  The guidance requires that investments which have declined in value due to credit concerns or solely due to changes in interest rates must be recorded as other-than-temporarily impaired unless the Company can assert and demonstrate its intention to hold the security for a period of time sufficient to allow for a recovery of fair value up to or beyond the cost of the investment which might mean maturity.  The delay of the effective date of EITF 03-1 will be superseded concurrent with the final issuance of proposed FSP Issue 03-1-a. Proposed FSP Issue 03-1-a is intended to provide implementation guidance with respect to all securities analyzed for impairment under paragraphs 10-20 of EITF 03-1.  Management continues to closely monitor and evaluate how the provisions of EITF 03-1 and proposed FSP Issue 03-1-a will affect the Company.

 

                In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 123R, Share-Based Payment, which is an Amendment of FASB Statement Nos. 123 and 95.  SFAS No. 123R changes, among other things, the manner in which share-based compensation, such as stock options, will be accounted for by both public and non-public companies.  For public companies, the cost of employee services received in exchange for equity instruments including options and restricted stock awards generally will be measured at fair value at the grant date.  The grant date fair value will be estimated using option-pricing models adjusted for the unique characteristics of those options and instruments, unless observable market prices for the same or similar options are available.  The cost will be recognized over the requisite service period, often the vesting period, and will be remeasured at each reporting date through settlement date.

 

            The changes in accounting will replace existing requirements under SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, and will eliminate the ability to account for share-based compensation transactions using APB Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, which does not require companies to expense options if the exercise price is equal to the trading price at the date of grant.  The accounting for similar transactions involving parties other than employees or the accounting for employee stock ownership plans that are subject to AICPA Statement of Position 93-6, Employers’ Accounting for Employee Stock Ownership Plans, would remain unchanged.

 

            On April 14, 2005, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) announced the adoption of a new rule that amends the compliance dates for SFAS No. 123R.  Under SFAS No. 123R, the Company would have been required to implement the standard as of the beginning of the first interim period that begins after June 15, 2005.  The SEC’s new rule allows companies to implement SFAS No. 123R at the beginning of their next fiscal year, instead of the next reporting period, that begins after June 15, 2005.  The SEC’s new rule does not change the accounting required by SFAS No. 123R; it changes only the dates for compliance with the standard.

 

 

 

Note 5.  Short Term Borrowings

 

                The Company had no borrowings with maturities of less than one year as of March 31, 2005.  As of December 31, 2004, the Company had Federal Home Loan Bank advances with maturities of less than one year of $34.4 million.

 

Note 6.  Long Term Borrowings

 

                The Company had Federal Home Loan Bank advances with maturity dates greater than one year of $78.1 million and $60.0 million as of March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004, respectively.  As of March 31, 2005, the advances have fixed interest rates ranging from 3.22% to 6.34%.

 

6



 

Note 7.  Junior Subordinated Debt Owed to Unconsolidated Trusts

 

                    The following table presents details on the junior subordinated debt owed to unconsolidated trusts as of March 31, 2005:

 

 

 

Trust I

 

Trust II

 

Trust III

 

 

 

(Dollars in thousands)

 

Date of issue

 

March 23, 2000

 

November 28, 2001

 

May 11, 2004

 

Amount of trust preferred securities issued

 

$

10,000

 

$

6,000

 

$

6,000

 

Rate on trust preferred securities

 

10.875

%

9.95

%

5.61% (variable)

 

Maturity

 

March 8, 2030

 

December 8, 2031

 

September 8, 2034

 

Date of first redemption

 

March 8, 2010

 

December 8, 2006

 

September 8, 2009

 

Common equity securities issued

 

$

310

 

$

186

 

$

186

 

Junior subordinated deferrable interest debentures owed

 

$

10,310

 

$

6,186

 

$

6,186

 

Rate on junior subordinated deferrable interest debentures

 

10.875

%

9.95

%

5.61% (variable)

 

 

                    On the dates of issue indicated above, the Trusts, being Delaware statutory business trusts, issued trust preferred securities (the “trust preferred securities”) in the amount and at the rate indicated above.  These securities represent preferred beneficial interests in the assets of the Trusts.  The trust preferred securities will mature on the dates indicated, and are redeemable in whole or in part at the option of the Company at any time after the date of first redemption indicated above, with the approval of the Federal Reserve Board and in whole at any time upon the occurrence of certain events affecting their tax or regulatory capital treatment.  The Trusts also issued common equity securities to Trinity in the amounts indicated above.  The Trust s used the proceeds of the offering of the trust preferred securities to purchase junior subordinated deferrable interest debentures (the debentures) issued by the Company, which have terms substantially similar to the trust preferred securities.  The Company has the right to defer payments of interest on the debentures at any time or from time to time for a period of up to ten consecutive semi-annual periods with respect to each interest payment deferred.  Under the terms of the debentures, in the event that under certain circumstances there is an event of default under the debentures or the Company has elected to defer interest on the debentures, the Company may not, with certain exceptions, declare or pay any dividends or distributions on its capital stock or purchase or acquire any of its capital stock.  The Company used the majority of the proceeds from the sale of the debentures to add to Tier 1 capital in order to support its growth.

 

                    Trinity owns all of the outstanding common stock of the Trusts.  The Trusts are considered variable interest entities (VIEs) under Financial Accounting Standards Board Interpretation (FIN) No. 46, “Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities, an interpretation of Accounting Research Bulletin No. 51”, as revised.  Prior to FIN 46, VIEs were generally consolidated by an enterprise when the enterprise had a controlling financial interest through ownership of a majority of voting interest in the entity.  Under FIN 46, a VIE should be consolidated by its primary beneficiary.  The Company implemented FIN 46 during the fourt h quarter of 2003.  Because Trinity is not the primary beneficiary of the Trusts, the financial statements of the Trusts are no longer included in the consolidated financial statements of the Company.  The Company’s prior financial statements have been reclassified to de-consolidate the Company’s investment in the Trusts.

 

                    The trust preferred securities are currently included in the Tier 1 capital of Trinity for regulatory capital purposes.  However, because the Trusts are no longer a part of the Company’s financial statements, the Federal Reserve Board may in the future disallow inclusion of the trust preferred securities in Tier 1 capital for regulatory capital purposes.  The most recent rule issued by the Federal Reserve Board indicated that it will continue to recognize these trust preferred securities as Tier 1 capital within certain limitations.  Please refer to Note 4, “Recent Accounting and Regulatory Developments”, for more information.  However, there can be no assurance that the Federal Reserve Board will continue to permit institutions to include trust preferred securities in Tier I capital for regulatory capital purposes.  As of March 31, 2005, assuming the Company was not permitted to include the $23 million in trust preferred securities issued by the Trusts in its Tier 1 capital, the Company would still exceed the regulatory required minimums for capital adequacy purposes.  If the trust preferred securities were no longer permitted to be included in Tier 1 capital, the Company would also be permitted to redeem the capital securities without penalty.

 

                    Payments of distributions on the trust preferred securities and payments on redemption of the trust preferred securities are guaranteed by the Company on a limited basis.  The Company also entered into an agreement as to expenses and liabilities with the Trusts pursuant to which it agreed, on a subordinated basis, to pay any costs, expenses or liabilities of the Trusts other than those arising under the trust preferred securities.  The obligations of the Company under the junior subordinated debentures, the related indenture, the trust agreement establishing the Trusts, the guarantee and the agreement as to expenses and liabilities, in the aggregat e, constitute a full and unconditional guarantee by the Company of the Trusts’ obligations under the trust preferred securities.

 

7



 

                Issuance costs of $615 thousand related to the trust preferred securities were deferred and are being amortized over the period until mandatory redemption of the securities in March 2030, December 2031 and September 2034, respectively.  During the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively, $5 thousand and $4 thousand of these issuance costs were amortized.  Unamortized issuance costs were $534 thousand and $476 thousand at March 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively.

 

                Distributions accrued and unpaid to securities holders totaled $286 thousand and $265 thousand on March 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively.

 

Note 8.  Commitments, Contingencies and Off-Balance Sheet Activities

 

                Credit-related financial instruments:  The Company is a party to credit-related commitments with off-balance-sheet risk in the normal course of business to meet the financing needs of its customers.  These credit-related commitments include commitments to extend credit, standby letters of credit and commercial letters of credit.  Such credit-related commitments involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit and interest rate risk in excess of the amount recognized in the consolidated balance sheets.

 

                The Company’s exposure to credit loss is represented by the contractual amount of these credit-related commitments.  The Company follows the same credit policies in making credit-related commitments as it does for on-balance-sheet instruments.

 

                At March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004, the following credit-related commitments were outstanding whose contract amounts represent credit risk:

 

 

 

Contract Amount

 

 

 

March 31,

 

December 31,

 

 

 

2005

 

2004

 

 

 

(In thousands)

 

Unfunded commitments under lines of credit

 

$

182,984

 

$

168,794

 

Commercial and standby letters of credit

 

33,928

 

33,319

 

 

                Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to a customer as long as there is no violation of any condition established in the contract.  Commitments generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require a payment of a fee.  The commitments for equity lines of credit may expire without being drawn upon.  Therefore, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements.  The amount of collateral obtained, if it is deemed necessary by the Company, is based on management’s credit evaluation of the customer.  Unfunded commitments under commercial lines of credit, revolving credit lines and overdraft protection agreements are commitments for possible future extensions of credit to existing customers.  Overdraft protection agreements are uncollateralized, but most other unfunded commitments have collateral.  These unfunded lines of credit usually do not contain a specified maturity date and may not necessarily be drawn upon to the total extent to which the Company is committed.

 

                Commercial and standby letters of credit are conditional credit-related commitments issued by the Company to guarantee the performance of a customer to a third party.  Those letters of credit are primarily issued to support public and private borrowing arrangements.  Essentially all letters of credit issued have expiration dates within one year. The credit risk involved in issuing letters of credit is the same as that involved in extending loans to customers.  The Company generally holds collateral supporting those credit-related commitments, if deemed necessary. In the event the customer does not perform in accordance with the terms of the agreement with the third party, the Company would be required to fund the credit-related commitment.  The maximum potential amount of future payments the Company could be required to make is represented by the contractual amount shown in the summary above.  If the credit-related commitment is funded, the Company would be entitled to seek recovery from the customer.  At March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004, no amounts have been recorded as liabilities for the Company’s potential obligations under these credit-related commitments.  The fair value of these credit-related commitments is approximately equal to the fees collected when granting these letters of credit.  These fees collected were $132 thousand and $60 thousand as of March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004, respectively, and are included in “other liabilities” on the Company’s balance sheet.

 

                Concentrations of credit risk:  The majority of the loans, commitments to extend credit, and standby letters of credit have been granted to customers in Los Alamos, Santa Fe and surrounding communities.  Although the Company has a diversified loan portfolio, a substantial portion of its loans are made to businesses and individuals associated with, or employed by, Los Alamos National Laboratory (“the Laboratory”).  The ability of such borrowers to honor their contracts is predominately dependent upon the continued operation and funding of the Laboratory.  Investments in securities issued by states and political subdivisions involve governmental entities within the state of New Mexico.  The distribution of commitments to extend credit approximates the distribution of loans outstanding.  Standby letters of credit were granted primarily to commercial borrowers.

 

8



 

                Contingencies:  In the normal course of business, the Company is involved in various legal proceedings.  In the opinion of management, after consulting with counsel, probable liabilities resulting from such proceedings would not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

 

Note 9.  Pro Forma Impact of Stock-Based Compensation Plans

 

                As allowed under SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, the Company measures stock-based compensation cost in accordance with the methods prescribed in Accounting Principles Board (APB) Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees.  As stock options are granted at fair value, there are no charges to earnings associated with stock options granted.  Accordingly, no compensation cost has been recognized for grants made to date.  Had compensation cost been determined based on the fair value method prescribed in FASB Statement No. 123, reported net income and earnings per common share would have been reduced to the pro forma amounts shown below:

 

 

Three Months Ended

 

 

 

March 31,

 

 

 

2005

 

2004

 

 

 

(In thousands, except

 

 

 

per share amounts)

 

Net income as reported

 

$

2,368

 

$

2,450

 

Deduct: Total stock-based employee compensation expense determined under fair value based method for all awards, net of related tax effects

 

28

 

28

 

Pro forma net income

 

$

2,340

 

$

2,422

 

Earnings per share:

 

 

 

 

 

Basic — as reported

 

$

0.35

 

$

0.36

 

Basic — pro forma

 

$

0.35

 

$

0.36

 

Diluted — as reported

 

$

0.35

 

$

0.36

 

Diluted — pro forma

 

$

0.35

 

$

0.35

 

 

9



 

Item 2.  Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

 

                This discussion is intended to focus on certain financial information regarding the Company and the Bank and is written to provide the reader with a more thorough understanding of its financial statements. The following discussion and analysis of the Company’s financial position and results of operations should be read in conjunction with the information set forth in Item 3, Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk and the annual audited consolidated financial statements filed on Form 10-K.

 

Special Note Concerning Forward-Looking Statements

 

                This Form 10-Q (including information incorporated by reference) contains, and our future oral and written statements may contain, forward-looking statements, within the meaning of such term in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, with respect to our financial condition, results of operations, plans, objectives, future performance and business.  Forward-looking statements, which may be based upon beliefs, expectations and assumptions of our management and on information currently available to management, are generally identifiable by the use of words such as “believe,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “plan,” “intend,” “estimate,” “may,” “will,” “would,” “could,” “should” or other similar expressions. Additionally, all statements in this document, including forward-looking statements, speak only as of the date they are made, and we undertake no obligation to update any statement in light of new information or future events.

 

                Our ability to predict results or the actual effect of future plans or strategies is inherently uncertain. Factors which could have a material adverse effect on our operations and future prospects include, but are not limited to, the following:

 

                                          The strength of the United States economy in general and the strength of the local economies in which we conduct our operations which may be less favorable than expected and may result in, among other things, a deterioration in the credit quality and value of our assets.

 

                                          The economic impact of any future terrorist threats or attacks, and the response of the United States to any such threats and attacks.

 

                                          The effects of, and changes in, federal, state and local laws, regulations and policies affecting banking, securities, insurance and monetary and financial matters.

 

                                          The effects of changes in interest rates (including the effects of changes in the rate of prepayments of our assets) and the policies of the Federal Reserve.

 

                                          Our ability to compete with other financial institutions as effectively as we currently intend due to increases in competitive pressures in the financial services sector.

 

                                          Our ability to obtain new customers and to retain existing customers.

 

                                          The timely development and acceptance of products and services, including products and services offered through alternative delivery channels such as the Internet.

 

                                          Technological changes implemented by us and by other parties, including third party vendors, which may be more difficult or more expensive than anticipated or which may have unforeseen consequences to us and our customers.

 

                                          Our ability to develop and maintain secure and reliable electronic systems.

 

                                          Our ability to retain key executives and employees and the difficulty that we may experience in replacing key executives and employees in an effective manner.

 

                                          Consumer spending and saving habits which may change in a manner that affects our business adversely.

 

                                          Business combinations and the integration of acquired businesses which may be more difficult or expensive than expected.

 

                                          The costs, effects and outcomes of existing or future litigation.

 

                                          Changes in accounting policies and practices, as may be adopted by state and federal regulatory agencies and the Financial Accounting Standards Board.

 

10



 

                                          Our ability to manage the risks associated with the foregoing as well as anticipated.

 

                                          Changes in the management and national policy regarding the primary employer in Los Alamos County, Los Alamos National Laboratory (the “Laboratory”), including changes in the level of funding.

 

                These risks and uncertainties should be considered in evaluating forward-looking statements and undue reliance should not be placed on such statements. Additional information concerning us and our business, including other factors that could materially affect our financial results, will be included in our filings with the SEC.

 

Critical Accounting Policies

 

                Allowance for Loan Losses:  Management believes the allowance for loan losses accounting policy is critical to the portrayal and understanding of our financial condition and results of operations. As such, selection and application of this “critical accounting policy” involves judgments, estimates, and uncertainties that are susceptible to change. In the event that different assumptions or conditions were to prevail, and depending upon the severity of such changes, the possibility of materially different financial condition or results of operations is a reasonable likelihood.

 

                The allowance for loan losses is maintained at an amount that management believes will be adequate to absorb probable losses on existing loans, based on an evaluation of the collectibility of loans and prior loss experience.  Three methods are used to evaluate the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses: (1) historical loss experience, based on loss experience by quality classification in the previous twelve calendar quarters; (2) specific identification, based upon management’s assessment of loans and the probability that a charge off will occur in the upcoming quarter; and (3) loan concentrations, based on current or expected economic factors in the geographic and industry sectors where management believes we may eventually experience some loan losses.  This evaluation also takes into consideration such factors as changes in the nature and volume of the loan portfolio, the value of underlying collateral, overall portfolio quality, review of specific problem loans, and current economic conditions that may affect the borrower’s ability to pay.

 

                While management uses the best information available to make its evaluation, future adjustments to the allowance may be necessary if there are significant changes in economic conditions. In addition, as an integral part of their examination process regulatory agencies periodically review our allowance for loan losses and may require us to make additions to the allowance based on their evaluation of information available at the time of their examinations.  Although we believe the allowance for loan losses is sufficient to cover probable losses inherent in the loan portfolio, there can be no assurance that the allowance will prove sufficient to cover actual future loan losses.

 

 

                    Mortgage Servicing Right (MSR) Assets:  Servicing residential mortgage loans for third-party investors represents a significant business activity of the Bank.  As of March 31, 2005, mortgage loans serviced for others totaled $918.5 million.  The MSRs on these loans total $8.6 million as of March 31, 2005.  The expected and actual rates of mortgage loan prepayments are the most significant factors driving the value of MSRs.  Increases in mortgage loan prepayments reduce estimated future net servicing cash flows because the life of the underlying loan is reduced.  In determining the fair value of the MSRs, mortgage interest rates, which are used to determine prepayment rates and disco unt rates are held constant over the estimated life of the portfolio.  Fair values of the MSRs are provided by an independent third-party broker of MSRs on a monthly basis.  The values given by the broker are based upon current market conditions and assumptions, which incorporate the expected life of the loans, estimated costs to service the loans, servicing fees to be received and other factors.  MSRs are carried at the lower of the initial capitalized amount, net of accumulated amortization, or fair value.

 

                    The fair value of the MSRs is driven primarily by the effect current mortgage interest rates have on the likelihood borr owers will prepay the underlying mortgages by refinancing at a lower rate.  Accordingly, higher interest rates decrease the likelihood of repayment, extending the life of the MSRs and increasing the value of these assets.  Lower interest rates increase the likelihood of repayment, contracting the life of the MSRs and decreasing the value of these assets.  This can have a significant impact on our income.  In the first three months of 2005, we recognized income of $564 thousand due to a decrease in the valuation allowance associated with MSRs; in the first three months of 2004, we incurred an expense of $364 thousand due to a increase in the valuation allowance associated with MSRs.  We can have no certainty on the direction and amount of interest rate changes looking forward, and therefore, the amount or direction of the change in valuation.

 

11



 

Overview

 

                The first quarter of 2005 was characterized by strong asset growth and flat income growth due to the anticipated drop in the mortgage loan refinance business due to higher rates, which was largely offset by strong growth in net interest income.  Net income was $2.4 million, a 3.3% decrease from the prior year first quarter earnings of $2.5 million.  Total assets grew $62.5 million from the prior year end, which is an annualized growth rate of 23.1%.

 

                Net interest income (not tax-equivalent), our major source of income, increased $912 thousand (or 10.1%) over the prior year first quarter.  This increase was mainly due to our growth in earning assets, while our net interest margin (not tax-equivalent) decreased from 3.92% in the first quarter of 2004 to 3.89% in the first quarter of 2005.  This decrease in margin was due to our decision to be more competitive in interest rates paid on deposit products in order to attract new deposits in the new Santa Fe office and to fund increasing loan demand.

 

                Looking forward to the remainder of the year 2005, we expect continued growth in deposits and loans from the newly opened branch in Santa Fe.  We also anticipate that Title Guaranty’s operations in Santa Fe will generate additional income.  We believe that we have sufficient capital to support this growth and remain well-capitalized.  The additional personnel and other costs associated with the new Santa Fe office as well as the new Title Guaranty office will likely increase other expenses compared to the prior year, since in 2004 the new office was opened only for a partial year.  However, we believe the increased growth in business generated by these offices will likely offset a portion or all of these expenses.

 

Results of Operations-Income Statement Analysis

 

                Net Income-General.  Net income for the three months ended March 31, 2005 was $2.4 million, compared to $2.5 million for the same period of 2004.  Diluted earnings per share decreased by $0.01 to $0.35 for the three months ended March 31, 2005 from $0.36 for the same period of 2004.  This represented a decrease in earnings per share of 2.8%.  This decrease was primarily due to a decline in non-interest income of $957 thousand (31.7%), which was largely offset by an increase in net interest income of $912 thousand (10.1%).    The effect of these and other items, net of taxes, was a decline in unaudited net income of approximately $82 thousand for the first quarter of 2005 compared to the first quarter of 2004.

 

                The profitability of the Company’s operations depends primarily on its net interest income, which is the difference between total interest earned on interest earning assets and total interest paid on interest bearing liabilities.  The Company’s net income is affected by its provision for loan losses as well as other income and other expenses.  The provision for loan losses reflects the amount thought to be adequate to cover probable credit losses in the loan portfolio.  Non-interest income or other income consists of mortgage loan servicing fees, loan and other fees, service charges on deposits, gain on sale of loans, gain on sale of securities and other operating income.  Other expenses include salaries and employee benefits, occupancy expenses, data processing expenses, marketing, amortization and valuation of mortgage servicing rights, supplies expense and other expenses.

 

                The amount of net interest income is affected by changes in the volume and mix of interest earning assets, the level of interest rates earned on those assets, the volume and mix of interest bearing liabilities, and the level of interest rates paid on those interest bearing liabilities.  The provision for loan losses is dependent on changes in the loan portfolio and management’s assessment of the collectibility of the loan portfolio, as well as economic and market conditions.  Other income and other expenses are impacted by growth of operations and growth in the number of accounts through both acquisitions and core banking business growth.  Growth in operations affects other expenses as a result of additional employees, branch facilities and promotional marketing expenses.  Growth in the number of accounts affects other income including service fees as well as other expenses such as computer services, supplies, postage, telecommunications and other miscellaneous expenses.

 

12



 

Net Interest Income.  The following tables present, for the periods indicated, the total dollar amount of interest income from average interest earning assets and the resultant yields, as well as the interest expense on average interest bearing liabilities, and the resultant costs, expressed both in dollars and rates. Borrowings made by the Company’s Employee Stock Ownership Plan (“ESOP”) from outside parties are not included in this analysis, as the interest expense on this borrowing is born by the ESOP. Funding for the ESOP is recognized as part of compensation expense:

 

 

 

Three Months Ended March 31,

 

 

 

2005

 

2004

 

 

 

Average

 

 

 

 

 

Average

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance

 

Interest

 

Yield/Rate

 

Balance

 

Interest

 

Yield/Rate

 

 

 

(Dollars in thousands)

 

Interest Earning Assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Loans(1)(2)

 

$

921,441

 

$

14,222

 

6.26

%

 $

763,041

 

$

11,938

 

6.29

%

Taxable investment securities

 

89,509

 

656

 

2.97

 

137,337

 

973

 

2.85

 

Investment securities exempt from federal income taxes(3)

 

17,288

 

281

 

6.59

 

20,434

 

243

 

4.78

 

Federal funds sold

 

708

 

4

 

2.29

 

40

 

 

0.54

 

Other interest bearing deposits

 

3,618

 

20

 

2.24

 

2,607

 

6

 

0.93

 

Investment in unconsolidated trust subsidiaries

 

682

 

16

 

9.51

 

496

 

13

 

10.54

 

Total interest earning assets

 

1,033,246

 

15,199

 

5.97

 

923,955

 

13,173

 

5.73

 

Non-interest earning assets

 

69,706

 

 

 

 

 

78,662

 

 

 

 

 

Total assets

 

$

1,102,952

 

 

 

 

 

 $

1,002,617

 

 

 

 

 

Interest Bearing Liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Deposits:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

NOW and money market deposits

 

$

124,517

 

$

326

 

1.06

%

 $

205,885

 

$

394

 

0.77

%

Savings deposits

 

374,263

 

1,045

 

1.13

 

211,278

 

549

 

1.05

 

Time deposits

 

378,205

 

2,610

 

2.80

 

334,540

 

2,025

 

2.43

 

Short-term borrowings

 

16,068

 

102

 

2.57

 

17,839

 

67

 

1.51

 

Long-term borrowings, including ESOP borrowings

 

62,917

 

577

 

3.72

 

66,346

 

607

 

3.68

 

Junior subordinated debt owed to unconsolidated trusts

 

22,682

 

519

 

9.28

 

16,496

 

439

 

10.70

 

Total interest bearing liabilities

 

978,652

 

5,179

 

2.15

 

852,384

 

4,081

 

1.93

 

Demand deposits—non-interest bearing

 

45,955

 

 

 

 

 

57,982

 

 

 

 

 

Other non-interest bearing liabilities

 

5,968

 

 

 

 

 

24,131

 

 

 

 

 

Stockholders’ equity, including stock owned by ESOP

 

72,377

 

 

 

 

 

68,120

 

 

 

 

 

Total liabilities and stockholders equity

 

$

1,102,952

 

 

 

 

 

 $

1,002,617

 

 

 

 

 

Net interest income/interest rate Spread(4)

 

 

 

10,020

 

3.82

%

 

 

$

9,092

 

3.80

%

Net interest margin on a fully tax equivalent basis(5)

 

 

 

 

 

3.93

%

 

 

 

 

3.96

%

Net interest margin(5)

 

 

 

 

 

3.89

%

 

 

 

 

3.92

%


(1)                                  Includes non-accrual loans of $5.4 million and $3.2 million for March 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively.

(2)                                  Interest income includes loan origination fees of $682 thousand and $730 thousand for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively.

(3)                                  Non-taxable investment income is presented on a fully tax equivalent basis, adjusting for federal and state exemption of interest income and certain other permanent tax differences.

(4)                                  Interest rate spread represents the difference between the average yield on interest earning assets and the average cost of interest bearing liabilities and is presented on a fully tax equivalent basis.

(5)                                  Net interest margin represents net interest income as a percentage of average interest earning assets.

 

13



 

                For the first quarter of 2005, net interest income on a fully tax equivalent basis increased $928 thousand to $10.0 million from $9.1 million for the first quarter of 2004.  The increase in net interest income resulted from an increase in interest income on a fully tax equivalent basis of $2.0 million (15.4%), while interest expense increased $1.1 million (26.9%).  Interest income on a fully tax equivalent basis increased due primarily to an increase in average earning assets of $109.3 million (11.8%).  Interest expense increased due to an increase in average interest bearing liabilities of $126.3 million (14.8%), which accounted for $657 thousand of the increase.  The cost on interest bearing liabilities increased 22 basis points, which accounted for $441 thousand of the increase in interest expense.  The net interest margin expressed in a fully tax equivalent basis decreased 3 basis points to 3.93% for 2005 from 3.96% for 2004.

 

Based on management’s review of the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses, provision for loan losses of $525 thousand was recorded for the three-month period ended March 31, 2005 versus provision of $600 thousand recorded during the same period of 2004.  The decrease in the provision for loan losses for the period ended March 31, 2005 reflected a number of factors, including the level of charge-offs, management’s overall view on current credit quality, the amount and status of impaired loans and the amount and status of past due accruing loans (90 days or more), as discussed in more detail below in the analysis relating to the Company’s financial condition.

 

                Volume, Mix and Rate Analysis of Net Interest Income.  The following tables present the extent to which changes in volume, changes in interest rates, and changes in the interest rates times the changes in volume of interest earning assets and interest bearing liabilities have affected our interest income and interest expense during the periods indicated.  Information is provided on changes in each category due to: (i) changes attributable to changes in volume (change in volume times the prior period interest rate); (ii) changes attributable to changes in interest rate (changes in rate times the prior period volume); and (iii) changes attributable to changes in rate/volume (changes in interest rate times changes in volume).  Changes attributable to the combined impact of volume and rate have been allocated proportionally to the changes due to volume and the changes due to rate:

 

 

 

Three Months Ended March 31,

 

 

 

2005 Compared to 2004

 

 

 

Change Due

 

Change Due

 

Total

 

 

 

to Volume

 

to Rate

 

Change

 

 

 

(In thousands)

 

Interest Earning Assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Loans

 

$

2,447

 

$

(163

)

$

2,284

 

Taxable investment securities

 

(348

)

31

 

(317

)

Investment securities exempt from federal income taxes(1)

 

(41

)

79

 

38

 

Federal funds sold

 

4

 

 

4

 

Other interest bearing deposits

 

3

 

11

 

14

 

Investment in unconsolidated trust subsidiaries

 

5

 

(2

)

3

 

Total increase (decrease) in interest income

 

2,070

 

(44

)

2,026

 

Interest Bearing Liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

NOW and money market deposit accounts

 

(186

)

118

 

(68

)

Savings deposits

 

452

 

44

 

496

 

Time deposits

 

282

 

303

 

585

 

Short-term borrowings

 

(8

)

43

 

35

 

Long-term borrowings

 

(31

)

1

 

(30

)

Junior subordinated debt owed to unconsolidated trusts

 

148

 

(68

)

80

 

Total increase (decrease) in interest expense

 

657

 

441

 

1,098

 

Increase (decrease) in net interest income

 

$

1,413

 

$

(485

)

$

928

 


 

(1)                                  Non-taxable investment income is presented on a fully tax equivalent basis, adjusting for federal and state exemption of interest income and certain other permanent tax differences.

 

14



 

Other Income.  Changes in other income between the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004 are as follows:

 

 

 

Three Months Ended

 

 

 

 

 

March 31,

2005

 

March 31,

2004

 

Net difference

 

 

 

(In thousands)

 

Other income:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Mortgage loan servicing fees

 

$

602

 

$

574

 

$

28

 

Loan and other fees

 

588

 

557

 

31

 

Service charges on deposits

 

331

 

331

 

 

Gain on sale of loans

 

463

 

1,016

 

(553

)

Gain on sale of securities

 

 

272

 

(272

)

Other operating income

 

76

 

267

 

(191

)

 

 

$

2,060

 

$

3,017

 

$

(957

)

 

In the first quarter of 2005, other income decreased by $957 thousand (31.7%) to $2.1 million from $3.0 million for the first quarter of 2004.  Gain on sale of loans decreased $553 thousand due to a continued drop in mortgage loan refinance activity due to increasing interest rates.  This drop in refinancing was expected and was experienced generally in the financial services industry.  In the first quarter of 2004, other income also included a gain of $272 thousand on the sale of securities, while there was no gain on the sale of securities in the first quarter of 2005.

 

                Other Expenses.  Changes in other expenses between the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004 are as follows:

 

 

 

Three Months Ended

 

 

 

 

 

March 31,

2005

 

March 31,

2004

 

Net difference

 

 

 

(In thousands)

 

Other expenses:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Salaries and employee benefits

 

$

4,058

 

$

3,853

 

$

205

 

Occupancy

 

799

 

494

 

305

 

Data processing

 

490

 

435

 

55

 

Marketing

 

324

 

226

 

98

 

Amortization and valuation of mortgage servicing rights

 

130

 

987

 

(857

)

Supplies

 

209

 

172

 

37

 

Other

 

1,648

 

1,362

 

286

 

 

 

$

7,658

 

$

7,529

 

$

129

 

 

For the first quarter of 2005, other expenses increased $129 thousand (1.7%) to $7.7 million in 2005 from $7.5 million in the first quarter of 2004.  The largest change was in the amortization and valuation of mortgage servicing rights, which declined $857 thousand from the first quarter of 2004 to the first quarter of 2005.  This was due to a decrease in the valuation allowance of $564 thousand in the first quarter of 2005, compared to an increase in the valuation allowance of $364 thousand in the first quarter of 2004, for a net decline in expense of $928 thousand.  This was partially offset by an increase in the amortization expense of the mortgage servicing rights of $71 thousand.  Occupancy expenses increased $305 thousand (61.7%), mainly due to the operation of the Santa Fe Downtown office, which was opened in August 2004.  Salaries and employee benefits increased by $205 thousand (5.3%), mainly due to an increase in $231 thousand (8.4%) in salary expenses, which was partially offset by a decline in personnel benefits expenses.  This increase in salary expenses was mainly due to changes in staffing to open the new Santa Fe Downtown office.

                Income Taxes.  In the first quarter of 2005, income tax expense was virtually unchanged, decreasing $17 thousand (1.2%) from the first quarter of 2004 for a total of $1.4 million in both years.  The effective tax rate increased slightly to 37.6% in the first quarter of 2005, compared to 37.1% in the first quarter of 2004.  A lower balance of tax-exempt municipal securities accounted for this slight increase.

 

15



 

Financial Condition-Balance Sheet Analysis

 

                General.  Total assets at March 31, 2005 remained at $1.1 billion, following an increase of $62.5 million (5.8%) from December 31, 2004.  During the same period, total liabilities increased $63.6 million (6.3%) to a total of $1.1 billion on March 31, 2005 from $1.0 billion on December 31, 2004.  The increase in total liabilities was primarily due to an increase in deposits of $81.5 million (9.3%), which was partially offset by a decrease in short-and long-term borrowings of $16.3 million (17.3%).   Stockholders’ equity (including stock owned by the Employee Stock Ownership Plan) decreased $1.1 million (1.6%) to $71.8 million on March 31, 2005 compared to $73.0 million on December 31, 2004.  This was primarily due to a large purchase of treasury stock in the first quarter of 2005 of $4.0 million, which was largely offset by an increase in retained earnings from current year operations of $2.4 million.

 

                Investment Securities.  The primary purposes of the investment portfolio are to provide a source of earnings, for liquidity management, to provide collateral to pledge against public deposits and to control interest rate risk.  In managing the portfolio, the Company seeks to obtain the objectives of safety of principal, liquidity, diversification and maximized return on funds.  For an additional discussion with respect to these matters, see  “Liquidity and Sources of Capital” under Item 2 and “Asset Liability Management” under Item 3 below.

 

                The following tables set forth the amortized cost and fair value of securities by accounting classification category and by type of security as indicated:

 

 

 

At March 31, 2005

 

At December 31, 2004

 

At March 31, 2004

 

 

 

Amortized

 

 

 

Amortized

 

 

 

Amortized

 

 

 

 

 

Cost

 

Fair Value

 

Cost

 

Fair Value

 

Cost

 

Fair Value

 

 

 

(In thousands)

 

Securities Available for Sale:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

U.S. Government agencies

 

$

40,088

 

$

39,616

 

$

42,218

 

$

41,907

 

$

47,956

 

$

48,187

 

States and political subdivisions

 

2,198

 

2,165

 

2,210

 

2,191

 

 

 

Equity securities

 

1

 

5

 

1

 

7

 

1

 

7

 

Total securities available for sale

 

$

42,287

 

$

41,786

 

$

44,429

 

$

44,105

 

$

47,957

 

$

48,194

 

Securities Held to Maturity:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

U.S. Government agencies

 

$

37,324

 

$

37,305

 

$

46,547

 

$

46,705

 

$

53,072

 

$

54,438

 

States and political subdivisions

 

15,053

 

15,079

 

15,111

 

15,178

 

20,442

 

20,638

 

Total securities held to maturity

 

$

52,377

 

$

52,384

 

$

61,658

 

$

61,883

 

$

73,514

 

$

75,076

 

Other securities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Non-marketable equity securities (including FRB and FHLB stock)

 

$

6,639

 

$

6,639

 

$

6,798

 

$

6,798

 

$

6,305

 

$

6,305

 

Investment in unconsolidated trusts

 

682

 

682

 

682

 

682

 

496

 

496

 

Total other securities

 

$

7,321

 

$

7,321

 

$

7,480

 

$

7,480

 

$

6,801

 

$

6,801

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

                Loan Portfolio.  The following tables set forth the composition of the loan portfolio:

 

 

 

At March 31, 2005

 

At December 31, 2004

 

At March 31, 2004

 

 

 

Amount

 

Percent

 

Amount

 

Percent

 

Amount

 

Percent

 

 

 

(Dollars in thousands)

 

Commercial

 

$

93,549

 

9.99

%

$

92,736

 

10.35

%

$

75,548

 

9.80

%

Commercial real estate

 

365,805

 

39.09

 

346,454

 

38.65

 

294,266

 

38.18

 

Residential real estate

 

288,515

 

30.82

 

282,380

 

31.50

 

232,995

 

30.22

 

Construction real estate

 

136,375

 

14.57

 

121,769

 

13.59

 

118,679

 

15.39

 

Installment and other

 

51,770

 

5.53

 

52,984

 

5.91

 

49,416

 

6.41

 

Total loans

 

936,014

 

100.00

 

896,323

 

100.00

 

770,904

 

100.00

 

Unearned income

 

(2,287

)

 

 

(2,002

)

 

 

(1,701

)

 

 

Gross loans

 

933,727

 

 

 

894,321

 

 

 

769,203

 

 

 

Allowance for loan losses

 

(8,689

)

 

 

(8,367

)

 

 

(7,734

)

 

 

Net loans

 

$

925,038

 

 

 

$

885,954

 

 

 

$

761,469

 

 

 

 

16



 

                Net loans increased $163.6 million (21.5%) to $925.0 million at March 31, 2005 from $761.5 million at March 31, 2004.  The increase was due primarily to growth in the Company’s commercial, commercial real estate and residential real estate loan portfolios.  This growth as been due to a combination of a strengthening local economy, more activity generated from our newest Santa Fe office and increased marketing of our loan products.

 

                We project continued growth in our loan portfolio due to a strengthened local economy, a stabilized Laboratory budget of over $2 billion and anticipated increases in interest rates.  We anticipate the volume of commercial real estate and construction loans to increase as the industry strengthens and the New Mexico economy continues to improve by attracting new business to the state.  Commercial real estate is strengthened due to vacancy rates returning to their historical averages and demand picking up due to new business looking to expand within the state.  The housing market for homes below $500 thousand remains strong and we project that market to remain constant.  We expect residential real estate for property worth greater than $1.5 million to be as soft as we have experienced during the last several years.

 

                Asset Quality.  The following table sets forth the amounts of non-performing loans and non-performing assets at the dates indicated:

 

 

 

At

March 31,

2005

 

At
December 31,
2004

 

At

March 31,

2004

 

 

 

(Dollars in thousands)

 

Non-accruing loans

 

$

5,580

 

$

5,714

 

$

3,275

 

Loans 90 days or more past due, still accruing interest

 

4

 

8

 

11

 

Total non-performing loans

 

5,584

 

5,722

 

3,286

 

Other real estate owned

 

3,523

 

6,438

 

6,843

 

Other repossessed assets

 

19

 

64

 

26

 

Total non-performing assets

 

$

9,126

 

$

12,224

 

$

10,155

 

Total non-performing loans to total loans

 

0.60

%

0.64

%

0.43

%

Allowance for loan losses to non-performing loans

 

155.61

%

146.23

%

235.36

%

Total non-performing assets to total assets

 

0.80

%

1.13

%

1.01

%

 

                At March 31, 2005, total non-performing assets decreased $1.0 million (10.1%) to $9.1 million from $10.2 million at March 31, 2004 due to decreases in other real estate owned of $3.3 million, which was partially offset by increases in non-performing loans of $2.3 million.  The decreases in other real estate owned was primarily due to the sale of two large residential construction loans in other real estate owned totaling $3.0 million.  Non-performing loans increased primarily due to a $2.4 million commercial real estate loan that was placed on non-accrual status in 2004.

 

                At March 31, 2005, total non-performing assets decreased $3.1 million (25.3%) to $9.1 million from $12.2 million at December 31, 2004, primarily due to decreases in other real estate owned of $2.9 million. The decreases in other real estate owned was primarily due to the sale of two large residential construction loan in other real estate owned totaling $3.0 million.

 

                Allowance for Loan Losses.  Management believes the allowance for loan losses accounting policy is critical to the portrayal and understanding of the Company’s financial condition and results of operations.  As such, selection and application of this “critical accounting policy” involves judgments, estimates, and uncertainties that are susceptible to change.  In the event that different assumptions or conditions were to prevail, and depending upon the severity of such changes, the possibility of materially different financial condition or results of operations is a reasonable likelihood.

 

                The allowance for loan losses is maintained at an amount that management believes will be adequate to absorb probable losses on existing loans, based on an evaluation of the collectibility of loans and prior loss experience.  This evaluation also takes into consideration such factors as changes in the nature and volume of the loan portfolio, the value of underlying collateral, overall portfolio quality, review of specific problem loans, and current economic conditions that may affect the borrower’s ability to pay.  While management uses the best information available to make its evaluation, future adjustments to the allowance may be necessary if there are significant changes in economic conditions. In addition, as an integral part of their examination process regulatory agencies periodically review the Company’s allowance for loan losses and may require the Company to make additions to the allowance based on their evaluation of information available at the time of their examinations.

 

17



 

                The following table presents an analysis of the allowance for loan losses for the periods presented:

 

 

 

Three Months Ended

 

 

 

March 31,

 

March 31,

 

 

 

2005

 

2004

 

 

 

(Dollars in thousands)

 

Balance at beginning of period

 

$

8,367

 

$

7,368

 

Provision for loan losses

 

525

 

600

 

Charge-offs

 

(238

)

(238

)

Recoveries

 

35

 

4

 

Net charge-offs

 

(203

)

(234

)

Balance at end of period

 

$

8,689

 

$

7,734

 

Gross loans at end of period

 

$

933,727

 

$

769,203

 

Ratio of allowance to total loans

 

0.93

%

1.01

%

Ratio of net charge-offs to average loans(1)

 

0.09

%

0.13

%


(1)                                  Net charge-offs are annualized for the purposes of this calculation.

 

                Net charge-offs for the three months ended March 31, 2005 totaled $203 thousand, a decrease of $31 thousand (13.2%) from $234 thousand from the three months ended March 31, 2004.  The majority of the charge-offs were residential real estate and personal loans.  The provision for loan losses decreased for the three months ended March 31, 2005 from 2004, due to management’s analysis of current non-performing loans and other factors.

 

                The following table sets forth the allocation of the allowance for loan losses for the periods presented and the percentage of loans in each category to total loans. An allocation for a loan classification is only for internal analysis of the adequacy of the allowance and is not an indication of expected or anticipated losses:

 

 

 

At March 31, 2005

 

At December 31, 2004

 

At March 31, 2004

 

 

 

Amount

 

Percent

 

Amount

 

Percent

 

Amount

 

Percent

 

 

 

(Dollars in thousands)

Commercial

 

$

4,398

 

9.99

%

$

3,502

 

10.35

%

$

1,968

 

9.80

%

Commercial and residential real estate

 

2,508

 

69.91

 

2,511

 

70.15

 

3,432

 

68.40

 

Construction real estate

 

995

 

14.57

 

981

 

13.59

 

1,338

 

15.39

 

Installment and other

 

754

 

5.53

 

1,369

 

5.91

 

949

 

6.41

 

Unallocated

 

34

 

N/A

 

4

 

N/A

 

47

 

N/A

 

Total

 

$

8,689

 

100.00

%

$

8,367

 

100.00

%

$

7,734

 

100.00

%


N/A—not applicable

 

                The portion of the allocation that was based upon historical loss experience decreased by $162 thousand (6.4%) in 2005, from $2.5 million on March 31, 2004 to $2.4 million on March 31, 2005.  This was largely due to a decrease in the allocation for commercial loans which decreased by $755 thousand, which was partially offset by an increase in the allocation for installment and other loans of $290 thousand.  Concentration allocation increased from $4.8 million on March 31, 2004 to $5.6 million on March 31, 2005.  This was due to an increase in the allocation for commercial loans of $1.3 million, which was partially offset by a lower allocation in real estate loans (a decline of $756 thousand).  The allocation for specifically identified loans increased from $345 thousand on March 31, 2004 to $664 thousand on March 31, 2005.  A $420 thousand commercial loan accounted for this increase, which was partially offset by decreases in other categories.

 

Total net charge-offs were substantially less in 2004 than in the previous two years, and this trend has continued in the first quarter of 2005. This was primarily due to a decrease in commercial charge-offs in 2004 and the first quarter of 2005.  Management projects losses to remain in this average barring any anomalies.

 

                Additions to the allowance for loan losses, which are charged to earnings through the provision for loan losses, are determined based on a variety of factors, as indicated above.  Although we believe the allowance for loan losses is sufficient to cover probable losses

 

18



 

inherent in the loan portfolio, there can be no assurance that the allowance will prove sufficient to cover actual future loan losses.

 

                Potential Problem Loans.  The Company utilizes an internal asset classification system as a means of reporting problem and potential problem assets.  At scheduled Board of Directors meetings every quarter, a list of total adversely classified assets is presented, showing other real estate owned, other repossessed assets, and all loans listed as “Substandard,” “Doubtful” and “Loss.”  All non-accrual loans are classed either as “Substandard” or “Doubtful” and are thus included in total adversely classified assets.  A separate watch list of loans classified as “Special Mention” is also presented.  An asset is classified Substandard if it is inadequately protected by the current net worth and paying capacity of the obligor or of the collateral pledged, if any. Substandard assets include those characterized by the distinct possibility that the Company will sustain some loss if the deficiencies are not corrected.  Assets classified as Doubtful have all the weaknesses inherent in those classified Substandard with the added characteristic that the weaknesses present make collection or liquidation in full, on the basis of currently existing facts, conditions and values, highly questionable and improbable.  Assets classified as Loss are those considered uncollectible and viewed as non-bankable assets, worthy of charge-off.  Assets that do not currently expose the Company to sufficient risk to warrant classification in one of the aforementioned categories, but possess weaknesses that may or may not be within the control of the customer are deemed to be Special Mention.

 

                The Company’s determination as to the classification of its assets and the amount of its valuation allowances is subject to review by the Bank’s primary regulators, which can order the establishment of additional general or specific loss allowances.  The Comptroller of the Currency, in conjunction with the other federal banking agencies, has adopted an interagency policy statement on the allowance for loan losses.  The policy statement provides guidance for financial institutions on both the responsibilities of management for the assessment and establishment of adequate allowances and guidance for banking agency examiners to use in determining the adequacy of general valuation guidelines.  Generally, the policy statement recommends that (i) institutions have effective systems and controls to identify, monitor and address asset quality problems; (ii) management has analyzed all significant factors that affect the collectibility of the portfolio in a reasonable manner; and (iii) management has established acceptable allowance evaluation processes that meet the objectives set forth in the policy statement.  Management believes it has established an adequate allowance for probable loan losses.  The Company analyzes its process regularly, with modifications made if needed, and reports those results quarterly at Board of Directors meetings.  However, there can be no assurance that regulators, in reviewing the Company’s loan portfolio, will not request the Company to materially increase its allowance for loan losses at a future time.  Although management believes that adequate specific and general loan loss allowances have been established, actual losses are dependent upon future events and, as such, further additions to the level of specific and general loan loss allowances may become necessary.

 

                The following table shows the amounts of adversely classified assets and special mention loans as of the periods indicated:

 

 

 

At

March 31,

2005

 

At

December 31,

2004

 

At

March 31,

 2004

 

 

 

(Dollars in thousands)

 

Loans classified as:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Substandard

 

$

12,431

 

$

15,810

 

$

12,170

 

Doubtful

 

546

 

201

 

95

 

Total adversely classified loans

 

12,977

 

16,011

 

12,265

 

Other real estate owned

 

3,523

 

6,438

 

6,843

 

Other repossessed assets

 

19

 

64

 

26

 

Total adversely classified assets

 

$

16,519

 

$

22,513

 

$

19,134

 

Special mention loans

 

$

23,713

 

$

22,834

 

$

13,577

 

 

                Total adversely classified assets decreased $2.6 million (13.6%) from March 31, 2004 to March 31, 2005.  The main reason for the decrease was a decrease of $3.3 million in other real estate owned.  Special mention loans increased $10.1 million (74.7%) between March 31, 2004 and March 31, 2005, primarily due to two commercial loan relationships totaling $8.7 million and one commercial real estate development loan relationship for $1.6 million being placed on the watch list.

 

                Deposits.  Total deposits increased $81.5 million (9.3%) during the first quarter of 2005.  This was partially due to a large increase in public funds of $30.9 million due expanded relationships with certain public entities.  The remainder of the increase was due to a variety of factors, including activity in the new office in Santa Fe and more competitive deposit rates combined with a strong marketing program of these rates.

 

19



 

                Sources of Funds

 

                                                Liquidity and Sources of Capital

 

                The Company’s cash flows are comprised of three classifications: cash flows from operating activities, cash flows from investing activities and cash flows from financing activities. Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities was $5.0 million and $(2.5) million for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively.  Net cash provided by operating activities increased $7.5 million in the first three months of 2005 compared to the first three months of 2004 largely due to an increase in the sale of loans held for sale, net of originations, by $6.9 million over the first three months of 2004.  Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities was $(26.0) million and $15.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively.  The $41.3 million decrease in cash provided by investing activities was largely due to a drop in the sale of investment securities of $28.4, as well as the decrease of cash provided by maturities and paydowns of securities of $8.2 million.  Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities was $58.7 million and $(2.2) million for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively.  The $60.9 million increase in cash provided by financing activities was mainly due to an increase in new deposit growth of $75.0 million from the first three months of 2005 compared to the first three months of 2004, which was partially offset by a decrease in cash provided by borrowings (net of repayments) of $10.1 million.

 

                The Company expects to have available cash to meet its liquidity needs.  Liquidity management is monitored by the Asset/Liability committee of the Bank, which takes into account the marketability of assets, the sources and stability of funding and the level of unfunded commitments.  In the event that additional short-term liquidity is needed, the Company has established relationships with several large regional banks to provide short-term borrowings in the form of federal funds purchases.  The Company has borrowed, and management believes that the Company could again borrow, up to $84.0 million for a short time from these banks on a collective basis.  Additionally, the Bank is a member of the Federal Home Loan Bank (“FHLB”) and has the ability to borrow from the FHLB.  The Company may also have up to 25% of its Tier 1 capital in the form of trust preferred securities.  As of March 31, 2005, the Company could borrow an additional $2.0 million in trust preferred securities.  As a contingency plan for significant funding needs, the Asset/Liability committee may also consider the sale of investment securities, selling securities under agreement to repurchase, sale of certain loans and/or the temporary curtailment of lending activities.

 

                At March 31, 2005, the Company’s total risk-based capital ratio was 11.04%, the Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets ratio was 10.11%, and the Tier 1 capital to average assets ratio was 8.53%.  The Bank was categorized as “well-capitalized” under Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation regulations at March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004.  At December 31, 2004, the Company’s total risk-based capital ratio was 11.59%, the Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets ratio was 10.65%, and the Tier 1 capital to average assets ratio was 8.87%.

 

                At March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004, the Company’s book value per common share was $10.88 and $10.84, respectively.

 

Item 3.  Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

 

Asset Liability Management

 

                Our net interest income is subject to “interest rate risk” to the extent that it can vary based on changes in the general level of interest rates. It is our policy to maintain an acceptable level of interest rate risk over a range of possible changes in interest rates while remaining responsive to market demand for loan and deposit products. The strategy we employ to manage our interest rate risk is to measure our risk using an asset/liability simulation model and adjust the maturity of securities in its investment portfolio to manage that risk.

 

                Interest rate risk can also be measured by analyzing the extent to which the repricing of assets and liabilities are mismatched to create an interest sensitivity “gap”. An asset or liability is said to be interest rate sensitive within a specific time period if it will mature or reprice within that time period. The interest rate sensitivity gap is defined as the difference between the amount of interest earning assets maturing or repricing within a specific time period and the amount of interest bearing liabilities maturing or repricing within that same time period. A gap is considered positive when the amount of interest rate sensitive assets exceeds the amount of interest rate sensitive liabilities. A gap is considered negative when the amount of interest rate sensitive liabilities exceeds the amount of interest rate sensitive assets.  During a period of rising interest rates, therefore, a negative gap would tend to adversely affect net interest income.  Conversely, during a period of falling interest rates, a negative gap position would tend to result in an increase in net interest income.

 

20



 

                The following tables set forth the amounts of interest earning assets and interest bearing liabilities outstanding at March 31, 2005, which we anticipate, based upon certain assumptions, to reprice or mature in each of the future time periods shown. Except as stated below, the amount of assets and liabilities shown which reprice or mature during a particular period were determined based on the earlier of the term to repricing or the term to repayment of the asset or liability.  These tables are intended to provide an approximation of the projected repricing of assets and liabilities at March 31, 2005 on the basis of contractual maturities and scheduled rate adjustments within a three-month period and subsequent selected time intervals.  The loan amounts in the table reflect principal balances expected to be reinvested and/or repriced as a result of contractual amortization and rate adjustments on adjustable-rate loans.  The contractual maturities and amortization of loans and investment securities reflect modest prepayment assumptions.  While NOW, money market and savings deposit accounts have adjustable rates, it is assumed that the interest rates on these accounts will not adjust immediately to changes in other interest rates.  Therefore, the table is calculated assuming that these accounts will reprice based upon an historical analysis of rate changes of these particular accounts, with repricing assigned to these accounts from one to thirteen months.

 

 

 

Time to Maturity or Repricing

 

As of March 31, 2005:

 

0-90 Days

 

91-365 Days

 

1-5 Years

 

Over 5 Years

 

Total

 

 

 

(In thousands)

 

Interest Earning Assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Loans

 

$

429,905

 

$

417,676

 

$

60,156

 

$

25,990

 

$

933,727

 

Loans held for sale

 

8,319

 

 

 

 

8,319

 

Investment securities

 

17,447

 

39,991

 

36,114

 

7,932

 

101,484

 

Securities purchased under agreements to resell

 

301

 

 

 

 

301

 

Interest bearing deposits with banks

 

23,208

 

 

 

 

23,208

 

Investment in unconsolidated trusts

 

186

 

 

 

310

 

496

 

Total interest earning assets

 

$

479,366

 

$

457,667

 

$

96,270

 

$

34,232

 

$

1,067,535

 

Interest Bearing Liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

NOW and money market deposit accounts

 

$

131,091

 

$

105,683

 

 

 

$

236,774

 

Savings deposits

 

97,695

 

160,131

 

7,276

 

 

265,102

 

Time deposits

 

92,021

 

213,987

 

72,641

 

8,635

 

387,284

 

Short- and long-term borrowings

 

1,915

 

5,865

 

15,038

 

55,293

 

78,111

 

Borrowings made by ESOP to outside parties

 

1,214

 

 

 

 

1,214

 

Junior subordinated debt owed to unconsolidated trusts

 

6,186

 

 

 

16,496

 

22,682

 

Total interest bearing liabilities

 

$

330,122

 

$

485,666

 

$

94,955

 

$

80,424

 

$

991,167

 

Rate sensitive assets (RSA)

 

$

479,366

 

$

937,033

 

$

1,033,303

 

$

1,067,535

 

$

1,067,535

 

Rate sensitive liabilities (RSL)

 

330,122

 

815,788

 

910,743

 

991,167

 

991,167

 

Cumulative GAP (GAP=RSA-RSL)

 

149,244

 

121,245

 

122,560

 

76,368

 

76,368

 

RSA/Total assets

 

41.94

%

81.99

%

90.41

%

93.41

%

93.41

%

RSL/Total assets

 

28.88

%

71.38

%

79.69

%

86.72

%

86.72

%

GAP/Total assets

 

13.06

%

10.61

%

10.72

%

6.69

%

6.69

%

GAP/RSA

 

31.13

%

12.94

%

11.86

%

7.15

%

7.15

%

 

                Certain shortcomings are inherent in the method of analysis presented in the foregoing table. For example, although certain assets and liabilities may have similar maturities or periods to repricing, they may react in different degrees to changes in market interest rates. Also, the interest rates on certain types of assets and liabilities may fluctuate in advance of changes in market interest rates, while interest rates on other types of assets may lag behind changes in market rates. Additionally, in the event of a change in interest rates, prepayment and early withdrawal levels would likely deviate significantly from those assumed in calculating the table. Therefore, we do not rely solely on a gap analysis to manage our interest rate risk, but rather we use what we believe to be the more reliable simulation model relating to changes in net interest income.

 

21



 

                Based on simulation modeling at March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004, our net interest income would change over a one-year time period due to changes in interest rates as follows:

 

Change in Net Interest Income Over One Year Horizon

 

Changes in Levels of
Interest Rates

 

At March 31, 2005

 

At December 31, 2004

 

 

Dollar Change

 

Percentage Change

 

Dollar Change

 

Percentage Change

 

 

 

(Dollars in thousands)

 

+ 2.00

%

$

(4,948

)

(12.06

)%

$

(5,183

)

(13.25

)%

+ 1.00

 

(2,310

)

(5.63

)

(2,030

)

(5.19

)

(1.00

)

1,005

 

2.45

 

595

 

1.52

 

(2.00

)

(1,937

)

(4.72

)

78

 

0.20

 

 

                Our simulations used assume the following:

 

1.                                       Changes in interest rates are immediate.

 

2.                                       It is our policy that interest rate exposure due to a 2% interest rate rise or fall be limited to 15% of our annual net interest income, as forecasted by the simulation model. As demonstrated by the table above, our interest rate risk exposure was within this policy at March 31, 2005.

 

                Changes in net interest income between the periods above reflect changes in the composition of interest earning assets and interest bearing liabilities, related interest rates, repricing frequencies, and the fixed or variable characteristics of the interest earning assets and interest bearing liabilities.  Projections of income given by the model are not actual predictions, but rather show our relative interest rate risk.  Actual interest income may vary from model projections.

 

Item 4.  Controls and Procedures.

 

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

 

We have established disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to the officers who certify our financial reports and to other members of senior management and the board of directors.  A review and evaluation was performed by our management, including the Company’s Chief Executive Officer (the “CEO”) and Chief Financial Officer (the “CFO”), of the  effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of March 31, 2005 pursuant to Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.  Based upon and as of the date of that review and evaluation, the CEO and CFO have concluded that our current disclosure controls and procedures, as designed and implemented, were effective in all material respects to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed in the reports we file and submit under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 are recorded, processed, summarized and reported as and when required.   There have been no changes in the Company’s disclosure controls or internal controls over financial reporting during the quarter ended March 31, 2005 that have materially affected, or are reasonable likely to materially affect, the Company’s disclosure controls or internal controls over financial reporting.

 

22



 

PART II — OTHER INFORMATION

 

Item 1.   Legal Proceedings

 

                Neither Trinity, the Bank or Title Guaranty are involved in any pending legal proceedings other than routine legal proceedings occurring in the normal course of business, which, in the opinion of management, in the aggregate, are material to our consolidated financial condition.

 

Item 2.  Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

 

                On February 17, 2005, the Company repurchased 153,846 shares of stock at $26.00 per share for a total of $4.0 million.  These shares were placed in treasury.

 

Item 3.  Defaults Upon Senior Securities

 

                None

 

Item 4.  Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

 

                None

 

Item 5.  Other Information

 

                None

 

Item 6.  Exhibits

 

31.1                           Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)

31.2                           Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)

32.1                           Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32.2                         Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

 

23



 

SIGNATURES

 

                Pursuant to the requirements of Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this registration statement to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

 

 

TRINITY CAPITAL CORPORATION

 

 

 

 

Date: May 6, 2005

By: 

/s/ WILLIAM C. ENLOE

 

 

William C. Enloe

 

 

President and Chief Executive Officer

 

 

 

Date: May 6, 2005

By: 

/s/ DANIEL R. BARTHOLOMEW

 

 

Daniel R. Bartholomew

 

 

Chief Financial Officer

 

24